[00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.780] [MUSIC] [00:00:01.780 --> 00:00:05.600] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:00:05.600 --> 00:00:09.280] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:00:09.280 --> 00:00:10.960] Our liberty depends on it. [00:00:10.960 --> 00:00:12.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and [00:00:12.280 --> 00:00:16.400] I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights. [00:00:16.400 --> 00:00:18.360] >> Privacy is under attack. [00:00:18.360 --> 00:00:21.960] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:00:21.960 --> 00:00:26.720] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:00:26.720 --> 00:00:28.160] So protect your rights. [00:00:28.160 --> 00:00:32.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:34.520] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:00:34.520 --> 00:00:38.120] This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, [00:00:38.120 --> 00:00:42.080] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:00:42.080 --> 00:00:44.160] Start over with Startpage. [00:00:44.160 --> 00:00:47.640] >> Spar, it's what fighters do. [00:00:47.640 --> 00:00:51.160] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:00:51.160 --> 00:00:54.240] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:00:54.240 --> 00:00:56.560] >> S-P-A-R with an extra P. [00:00:56.560 --> 00:01:02.160] S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for [00:01:02.160 --> 00:01:02.840] religion. [00:01:02.840 --> 00:01:06.480] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, [00:01:06.480 --> 00:01:08.400] press, assembly, and religion. [00:01:08.400 --> 00:01:10.760] But petition for redress is another matter. [00:01:10.760 --> 00:01:14.480] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [00:01:14.480 --> 00:01:17.440] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, [00:01:17.440 --> 00:01:21.280] we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [00:01:21.280 --> 00:01:22.560] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [00:01:22.560 --> 00:01:25.520] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [00:01:25.520 --> 00:01:31.520] [MUSIC] [00:01:31.520 --> 00:01:35.040] Pressure, we usually associate it with stress and negativity, but [00:01:35.040 --> 00:01:37.560] sometimes a bit of pressure can be healing. [00:01:37.560 --> 00:01:40.600] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you how conditions like [00:01:40.600 --> 00:01:45.800] nausea can be cured using the traditional Chinese therapy known as acupressure. [00:01:45.800 --> 00:01:47.760] >> Privacy is under attack. [00:01:47.760 --> 00:01:51.400] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:01:51.400 --> 00:01:56.160] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:01:56.160 --> 00:01:57.560] So protect your rights. [00:01:57.560 --> 00:02:01.400] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [00:02:01.400 --> 00:02:03.880] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:02:03.880 --> 00:02:07.480] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [00:02:07.480 --> 00:02:11.440] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:02:11.440 --> 00:02:13.520] Start over with Startpage. [00:02:13.520 --> 00:02:18.320] >> Acupressure is an ancient practice that uses finger or [00:02:18.320 --> 00:02:21.880] hand pressure to cure everything from headaches to constipation. [00:02:21.880 --> 00:02:25.280] The pressure is applied to points known as meridians that are believed to control [00:02:25.280 --> 00:02:27.480] the flow of energy in the human body. [00:02:27.480 --> 00:02:31.400] Acupressure offers a simple cure for nausea you might try the next time you get [00:02:31.400 --> 00:02:34.360] a queasy stomach or a case of motion sickness. [00:02:34.360 --> 00:02:37.680] Simply apply moderate pressure to the point known as P6. [00:02:37.680 --> 00:02:39.480] You'll find it on the inside of your wrist, [00:02:39.480 --> 00:02:42.120] about two fingers width down from your palm. [00:02:42.120 --> 00:02:46.440] Placing pressure on the P6 point works on the same principle as those pricey [00:02:46.440 --> 00:02:50.520] anti-nausea wristbands, but this relief is free and always on hand. [00:02:50.520 --> 00:02:52.800] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. [00:02:52.800 --> 00:02:55.720] More news and information at katherinealbrecht.com. [00:02:55.720 --> 00:03:05.720] [MUSIC] [00:03:05.720 --> 00:03:15.720] [MUSIC] [00:03:15.720 --> 00:03:32.160] >> Good evening, folks. [00:03:32.160 --> 00:03:35.200] This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig. [00:03:35.200 --> 00:03:37.920] It is March 28, 2022. [00:03:37.920 --> 00:03:41.880] We are live tonight, and I do apologize for my absence. [00:03:41.880 --> 00:03:47.000] I have been working diligently on the new seminar book, just as fast and [00:03:47.000 --> 00:03:48.680] furious as I possibly can, but [00:03:48.680 --> 00:03:52.720] still trying to be as complete and accurate and thorough as possible. [00:03:52.720 --> 00:03:57.280] That said, I don't have a whole lot to go into tonight at the beginning of [00:03:57.280 --> 00:04:04.880] the show, so if you wanna start calling in, the call-in number is 512-646-1984. [00:04:04.880 --> 00:04:08.000] I was beginning to wonder if I was gonna make it around to the show today. [00:04:08.000 --> 00:04:09.120] I had so much going on, [00:04:09.120 --> 00:04:12.080] I didn't know if I was gonna be able to get back in time to get it done, but [00:04:12.080 --> 00:04:13.280] here I am. [00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:15.560] So I'm not prepared, but we are on. [00:04:15.560 --> 00:04:19.360] So if you wanna call in and talk, call that number and let's do that. [00:04:19.360 --> 00:04:26.160] In the meantime, the book is now up to 240 some odd pages, [00:04:26.160 --> 00:04:31.800] some of which you've seen at some point in the past, [00:04:31.800 --> 00:04:36.080] some of which you most certainly have not, especially not written in this detail and [00:04:36.080 --> 00:04:37.440] this degree. [00:04:37.440 --> 00:04:42.040] And most certainly it is not something that our public servants have ever seen [00:04:42.040 --> 00:04:42.560] before. [00:04:42.560 --> 00:04:51.040] That said, my hope is to make this book useful to such an extent [00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:55.320] that you can literally throw it into court as evidence. [00:04:55.320 --> 00:04:59.880] And all we have to do is make judicial notice of the stuff it contains, [00:04:59.880 --> 00:05:02.040] because everything it contains is Texas statute. [00:05:02.040 --> 00:05:05.160] The discussion on it, everything about it. [00:05:05.160 --> 00:05:11.320] Hopefully at some point, if I can get this published correctly and [00:05:11.320 --> 00:05:16.280] actually get it set up that way, then I can actually be called in as [00:05:16.280 --> 00:05:20.360] an expert witness on this subject because of the book, but we will see. [00:05:20.360 --> 00:05:22.840] That's what I'm shooting for anyway. [00:05:22.840 --> 00:05:27.560] Now, we got lots of stuff in the hopper here, [00:05:27.560 --> 00:05:30.600] most of which is we need money folks. [00:05:30.600 --> 00:05:35.080] I hate to say it, but I understand how times are getting for everybody. [00:05:35.080 --> 00:05:39.200] Believe me, I do and believe me, I know who is responsible for it. [00:05:39.200 --> 00:05:43.800] But if at all possible, please remember that we can't do what we do without you [00:05:43.800 --> 00:05:46.800] guys, none of us are independently wealthy. [00:05:46.800 --> 00:05:51.680] If you can support us even on a regular basis with a little bit money every month, [00:05:51.680 --> 00:05:55.560] that goes a long way to getting us to places we couldn't otherwise reach on our [00:05:55.560 --> 00:05:59.960] own, so please help us as much as you can. [00:05:59.960 --> 00:06:02.600] Now that said, I have a couple of callers on the board here. [00:06:02.600 --> 00:06:05.280] First up appears to be Jane in Texas. [00:06:05.280 --> 00:06:06.600] Jane, what can we do for you? [00:06:06.600 --> 00:06:08.520] >> My gosh, already? [00:06:08.520 --> 00:06:09.160] I wasn't ready yet. [00:06:09.160 --> 00:06:12.160] Hi Eddie, how are you doing? [00:06:12.160 --> 00:06:13.920] >> Good, how are you doing? [00:06:13.920 --> 00:06:14.520] >> I'm all right. [00:06:14.520 --> 00:06:16.600] I'm stressing a little bit, [00:06:16.600 --> 00:06:19.960] getting closer to the day that I'm going to be going to court the day after tomorrow. [00:06:21.840 --> 00:06:26.720] My main, like I was telling you in class, [00:06:26.720 --> 00:06:31.200] I get thrown off with different things that I read. [00:06:31.200 --> 00:06:35.360] And since I didn't get to go over the chapter four with y'all in class, [00:06:35.360 --> 00:06:39.800] I sent you an email today about chapter four. [00:06:39.800 --> 00:06:47.440] And it seems to me like the chapter four that the municipal court gets jurisdiction. [00:06:49.600 --> 00:06:50.760] Do I need to bring it up? [00:06:50.760 --> 00:06:55.400] >> Okay, get jurisdiction of what and how? [00:06:55.400 --> 00:07:05.240] >> Criminal charges, and there are state criminal charges, like penal codes. [00:07:05.240 --> 00:07:10.600] >> Okay, if the complaint is not valid, [00:07:10.600 --> 00:07:17.640] which we have determined it is not because it does not comply with law, okay? [00:07:17.640 --> 00:07:21.960] It does not charge an offense against the laws of this state. [00:07:21.960 --> 00:07:28.920] It charges an offense against an ordinance, which is not a law of this state, okay? [00:07:28.920 --> 00:07:31.160] >> Okay. [00:07:31.160 --> 00:07:36.560] >> It's not signed by a credible person as the affiant. [00:07:36.560 --> 00:07:39.640] It is signed by a clerk of the municipal court, [00:07:39.640 --> 00:07:43.680] which creates an immediate conflict with the court trying the case, [00:07:43.680 --> 00:07:47.400] because their agent is also the accuser. [00:07:47.400 --> 00:07:48.160] You see the problem? [00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:50.080] >> Yes, I do. [00:07:50.080 --> 00:07:55.520] But you were saying in chapter 45, the application on chapter where [00:07:55.520 --> 00:07:58.800] it doesn't tell them what to do, then they have to go to the rules. [00:07:58.800 --> 00:08:07.440] But the other day we were talking about, if I don't object to the defect or [00:08:07.440 --> 00:08:10.880] error in a regularity of form of substance in a charging instrument for [00:08:10.880 --> 00:08:15.640] the date on which the trial, then I waive or forfeit that right. [00:08:15.640 --> 00:08:19.120] But right before that, that was an F. [00:08:19.120 --> 00:08:22.720] But in D and E and 1, 2, 3, 4, [00:08:22.720 --> 00:08:28.280] after that, it gives those people in chapter 45, [00:08:28.280 --> 00:08:34.200] except for the fact that it gives the municipal judge, [00:08:34.200 --> 00:08:41.560] the clerk, and the city secretary, and all those people permission to sign the complaint. [00:08:41.560 --> 00:08:44.320] >> They cannot sign it as the affiant. [00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:47.640] They can witness the complaint. [00:08:47.640 --> 00:08:54.640] But the problem is they are not authorized to do it as an officer, [00:08:54.640 --> 00:08:59.240] which is what's required and it's not done under oath with a proper juror. [00:08:59.240 --> 00:09:01.440] It's not a sworn complaint. [00:09:01.440 --> 00:09:08.400] Even chapter 45 says it must be a sworn complaint. [00:09:08.400 --> 00:09:13.520] Well, there's no juror and there's no one there with personal knowledge. [00:09:13.520 --> 00:09:17.440] So it cannot be sworn, end of discussion. [00:09:17.440 --> 00:09:18.960] There's no debate about that. [00:09:18.960 --> 00:09:25.280] >> Okay, okay, so then a proper juror would be meaning that it has to be by [00:09:25.280 --> 00:09:29.280] someone who's given the power to administer- >> Someone who is doing it [00:09:29.280 --> 00:09:33.920] under penalty of perjury from first hand knowledge, and they're not. [00:09:33.920 --> 00:09:36.960] >> Okay, all right. [00:09:36.960 --> 00:09:42.600] So I really can't get, they can't get past that on the hearing. [00:09:42.600 --> 00:09:45.080] As long as I can present it, as long as I can sell on that. [00:09:45.080 --> 00:09:50.040] >> The Texas Constitution and the Code of Criminal Procedure all say it must be [00:09:50.040 --> 00:09:51.000] sworn. [00:09:51.000 --> 00:09:55.080] They cannot make it sworn by someone without personal knowledge. [00:09:55.080 --> 00:09:57.080] The law in Texas will not allow it. [00:09:57.080 --> 00:10:04.120] >> Okay, okay, well, sir, they're just assuming from fact of, [00:10:04.120 --> 00:10:10.240] I mean, they're actually just doing it- >> The last email I sent you and [00:10:10.240 --> 00:10:14.960] told you what to fill out and how to do it is what you need to do. [00:10:14.960 --> 00:10:21.120] And you are not limited by the time you can do it because it's a subject matter [00:10:21.120 --> 00:10:23.240] jurisdiction challenge. [00:10:23.240 --> 00:10:26.280] If there's no proper complaint before the court, [00:10:26.280 --> 00:10:30.640] they can't just simply say you waived it and let it through. [00:10:30.640 --> 00:10:34.360] If the complaint's invalid because of lack of jurisdiction and [00:10:34.360 --> 00:10:38.320] no proper jurat and it was never sworn, it's invalid period. [00:10:38.320 --> 00:10:40.520] And the statute can't make it not so. [00:10:40.520 --> 00:10:45.520] >> Okay, okay, so before, so if I can get it, [00:10:45.520 --> 00:10:50.400] which one would be first, that one or the statute of limitations? [00:10:50.400 --> 00:10:55.760] >> They, it's all the same arguments. [00:10:55.760 --> 00:10:59.840] They lack jurisdiction because they're past statute of limitations. [00:10:59.840 --> 00:11:04.120] They lack jurisdiction because there is no properly sworn complaint before [00:11:04.120 --> 00:11:04.840] the court. [00:11:04.840 --> 00:11:10.000] They lack jurisdiction because the court cannot be both the complainant and [00:11:10.000 --> 00:11:12.800] the trier of the fact and the law. [00:11:12.800 --> 00:11:13.720] They can't do it. [00:11:13.720 --> 00:11:15.040] It's a conflict of interest. [00:11:15.040 --> 00:11:19.160] >> Okay, yeah, I just needed, I'm sorry, I just needed this pep talk so [00:11:19.160 --> 00:11:21.200] I could get, make sure I got it straight. [00:11:21.200 --> 00:11:26.560] I need to quit looking at other things and just, I'm gonna make a sheet of stuff [00:11:26.560 --> 00:11:29.840] that I just need to stick to the point that- >> It's not that you need to keep [00:11:29.840 --> 00:11:31.440] quit looking at other things. [00:11:31.440 --> 00:11:32.960] The other things you're looking at, [00:11:32.960 --> 00:11:38.560] you need to understand why they won't save them, based upon what I'm telling you. [00:11:38.560 --> 00:11:40.060] >> Okay. [00:11:40.060 --> 00:11:44.600] >> See, every time you read something new that seems to work, [00:11:44.600 --> 00:11:47.440] then you say, okay, that takes precedence in your mind. [00:11:47.440 --> 00:11:48.200] No, it doesn't. [00:11:48.200 --> 00:11:52.720] If they violated the Constitution and due process, [00:11:52.720 --> 00:11:55.160] nothing else is going to fix their problem. [00:11:55.160 --> 00:11:57.520] >> Okay, okay. [00:11:59.680 --> 00:12:02.800] All right, okay, I'm not gonna take up all your time. [00:12:02.800 --> 00:12:05.600] I know you got a bunch of other people to talk to, so- [00:12:05.600 --> 00:12:06.440] >> Well, we can only hope. [00:12:06.440 --> 00:12:09.920] [LAUGH] >> All right, [00:12:09.920 --> 00:12:11.800] well, if I don't get something else, I'm gonna call back. [00:12:11.800 --> 00:12:13.040] Okay, thanks, Eddie. [00:12:13.040 --> 00:12:14.480] >> All right, you're welcome. [00:12:14.480 --> 00:12:15.440] >> All right, bye-bye. [00:12:15.440 --> 00:12:15.940] >> Bye-bye. [00:12:15.940 --> 00:12:22.120] All right, call in number 512-646-1984. [00:12:22.120 --> 00:12:23.720] Give us a call, people, let's talk. [00:12:23.720 --> 00:12:25.520] We are live tonight. [00:12:25.520 --> 00:12:27.760] All right, we have John in New York. [00:12:27.760 --> 00:12:29.000] John, what can we do for you? [00:12:30.440 --> 00:12:34.080] >> Well, I've got kind of a convoluted story to tell you, and [00:12:34.080 --> 00:12:36.320] here it goes, it involves DWI. [00:12:36.320 --> 00:12:43.680] Two girls were at a house, and I guess there might have been a party, and [00:12:43.680 --> 00:12:45.080] they had a couple of drinks each. [00:12:45.080 --> 00:12:49.880] And they got into the car near the house. [00:12:49.880 --> 00:12:54.400] The house has a camera, an outside camera, and [00:12:54.400 --> 00:12:57.800] that camera was aimed at the car when they got in. [00:12:57.800 --> 00:13:00.120] So there's some evidence there who was driving. [00:13:00.120 --> 00:13:05.040] Later, the car got stopped doing 68 in a 45. [00:13:05.040 --> 00:13:10.680] And the cop saw the girl get into the, [00:13:10.680 --> 00:13:14.880] saw the real driver get into the back seat. [00:13:14.880 --> 00:13:16.240] She jumped into the back seat. [00:13:16.240 --> 00:13:18.720] And there was the other girl, [00:13:18.720 --> 00:13:21.360] the passenger, sitting on the passenger side in the front. [00:13:22.360 --> 00:13:27.680] The cop actually saw the girl who was the passenger slide over [00:13:27.680 --> 00:13:31.000] to the driver's side to open the window to talk to the cop. [00:13:31.000 --> 00:13:38.680] So we got the real driver jumping in the back seat, and we got the passenger [00:13:38.680 --> 00:13:45.160] sliding over, and the cop saw her slide over in order to open the window. [00:13:45.160 --> 00:13:50.040] The girl six times, and [00:13:50.040 --> 00:13:55.000] the cop kept asking the real girl driver, who was now in the back seat, questions. [00:13:55.000 --> 00:14:01.080] And the passenger girl six times said, [00:14:01.080 --> 00:14:04.700] you were driving the car, answer the officer. [00:14:04.700 --> 00:14:07.080] You were driving the car, answer the officer. [00:14:07.080 --> 00:14:11.760] And the cop himself said three or four times, [00:14:11.760 --> 00:14:15.080] why did you get out of the driver's seat and get into the back seat? [00:14:15.080 --> 00:14:19.400] He asked the real driver that question three or four times. [00:14:20.600 --> 00:14:22.840] Why'd you get out of the front seat and get into the back? [00:14:22.840 --> 00:14:27.680] And the whole time the cop had the light shining, [00:14:27.680 --> 00:14:33.760] the spotlight shining on the inside of the car from behind. [00:14:33.760 --> 00:14:38.280] So you would think he probably saw any movement in the car as well. [00:14:38.280 --> 00:14:44.320] But we can't speak for the cop, but I guarantee you he was watching. [00:14:46.880 --> 00:14:54.440] Let's see, then the girl said several times at the police station, [00:14:54.440 --> 00:15:01.120] the passenger girl said the other girl was driving, I was not driving. [00:15:01.120 --> 00:15:04.720] And she said that several times. [00:15:04.720 --> 00:15:06.600] The cop ignored her, naturally. [00:15:06.600 --> 00:15:14.320] And the real driver later was talking to someone who was incarcerated. [00:15:15.480 --> 00:15:19.520] And you know those two-way phones that they have with the little glass window in [00:15:19.520 --> 00:15:20.040] between? [00:15:20.040 --> 00:15:22.440] Well, they record those calls. [00:15:22.440 --> 00:15:29.760] And the real driver admitted to the sister of the girl, [00:15:29.760 --> 00:15:32.000] who was the passenger, if you could follow that. [00:15:32.000 --> 00:15:37.200] She, well, the bottom line is she admitted that she was the driver and [00:15:37.200 --> 00:15:38.960] the other girl wasn't. [00:15:38.960 --> 00:15:40.600] And those calls are recorded. [00:15:40.600 --> 00:15:44.760] So that's the most convoluted situation I have ever run across. [00:15:45.680 --> 00:15:49.600] In my experience, so there you have it. [00:15:49.600 --> 00:15:50.280] Any comments? [00:15:50.280 --> 00:15:53.920] >> Such as what? [00:15:53.920 --> 00:15:57.360] What is there to comment on? [00:15:57.360 --> 00:16:00.800] The sheer stupidity of all this is beyond talking about. [00:16:00.800 --> 00:16:03.440] The cop saw everything. [00:16:03.440 --> 00:16:07.960] The girl's gonna wind up getting more charges on her for [00:16:07.960 --> 00:16:10.400] giving false information to a police officer. [00:16:11.760 --> 00:16:13.880] Cuz he's got her dead to rights if he saw her. [00:16:13.880 --> 00:16:18.440] >> Excuse me, excuse me. [00:16:18.440 --> 00:16:21.560] The passenger got arrested for DWI. [00:16:21.560 --> 00:16:23.120] I forgot the most important part. [00:16:23.120 --> 00:16:27.080] The passenger got arrested for DWI. [00:16:27.080 --> 00:16:31.760] And she blew a 1A, according to the cop. [00:16:31.760 --> 00:16:36.160] And in New York State, it's 0.08. [00:16:36.160 --> 00:16:38.080] >> Well, it's 0.08 everywhere. [00:16:38.080 --> 00:16:41.280] Hang on just a second, and we'll be right back after this break. [00:16:43.280 --> 00:16:47.600] All right, folks, call in number 512-646-1984. [00:16:47.600 --> 00:16:49.560] Give us a call, get in line, let's talk. [00:16:49.560 --> 00:16:50.320] We'll be right back. [00:16:50.320 --> 00:17:00.320] [MUSIC] [00:17:00.880 --> 00:17:03.920] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and [00:17:03.920 --> 00:17:06.120] a better understanding of his word? [00:17:06.120 --> 00:17:11.040] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 PM Central Time [00:17:11.040 --> 00:17:15.440] for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord [00:17:15.440 --> 00:17:17.640] with 2 Timothy 2.15. [00:17:17.640 --> 00:17:22.200] Study to show thy self-approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, [00:17:22.200 --> 00:17:24.600] rightly dividing the word of truth. [00:17:24.600 --> 00:17:28.120] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the book of Mark, [00:17:28.120 --> 00:17:32.160] where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [00:17:32.160 --> 00:17:36.320] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound [00:17:36.320 --> 00:17:39.160] doctrine and Christian character development. [00:17:39.160 --> 00:17:43.680] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [00:17:43.680 --> 00:17:45.640] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and [00:17:45.640 --> 00:17:50.200] to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior, Jesus. [00:17:50.200 --> 00:17:55.160] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to [00:17:55.160 --> 00:17:59.200] 10 PM to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures. [00:17:59.200 --> 00:18:03.720] >> Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, [00:18:03.720 --> 00:18:05.720] letters, or even lawsuits? [00:18:05.720 --> 00:18:09.440] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirras proven method. [00:18:09.440 --> 00:18:13.360] Michael Mirras has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and [00:18:13.360 --> 00:18:15.040] now you can win too. [00:18:15.040 --> 00:18:19.280] You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using [00:18:19.280 --> 00:18:21.200] federal civil rights statutes. [00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:24.920] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. [00:18:24.920 --> 00:18:26.960] How to answer letters and phone calls. [00:18:26.960 --> 00:18:29.560] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [00:18:29.560 --> 00:18:34.200] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [00:18:34.200 --> 00:18:39.040] The Michael Mirras proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [00:18:39.040 --> 00:18:41.480] Personal consultation is available as well. [00:18:41.480 --> 00:18:44.960] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and [00:18:44.960 --> 00:18:49.840] click on the blue Michael Mirras banner or email MichaelMirras@yahoo.com. [00:18:49.840 --> 00:18:55.400] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or [00:18:55.400 --> 00:18:59.960] email MichaelMirras@yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [00:18:59.960 --> 00:19:01.960] [MUSIC] [00:19:01.960 --> 00:19:05.840] >> You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, [00:19:05.840 --> 00:19:08.440] LogosRadioNetwork.com. [00:19:08.440 --> 00:19:18.440] [MUSIC] [00:19:18.440 --> 00:19:28.440] [MUSIC] [00:19:28.440 --> 00:19:37.720] >> All right, folks, we are back. [00:19:37.720 --> 00:19:40.560] This is Rule of Law Radio Monday Night Show with your host, Eddie Craig. [00:19:40.560 --> 00:19:47.680] We are live tonight on February 28th, 2020, I'm sorry, March 28th, 2022. [00:19:47.680 --> 00:19:51.240] And just real quick before I get back to John in New York, [00:19:51.240 --> 00:19:56.000] Janet, if you are still listening, your other email that you sent me asking about [00:19:56.000 --> 00:20:03.080] why the court's extension of time doesn't count against the statute of limitations [00:20:03.080 --> 00:20:11.440] is because the plaintiff cannot delay the trial in a way that penalizes the defense. [00:20:11.440 --> 00:20:15.920] Okay, the state cannot extend the time with constant delays so [00:20:15.920 --> 00:20:19.600] as to extend the period of time they have to prosecute you. [00:20:19.600 --> 00:20:21.640] That's not the way it works. [00:20:21.640 --> 00:20:24.960] The statute of limitations is there for a reason. [00:20:24.960 --> 00:20:29.920] You're the only one that can extend it by requesting an extension of time or [00:20:29.920 --> 00:20:32.040] a continuance or a reset. [00:20:32.040 --> 00:20:33.280] The state cannot. [00:20:33.280 --> 00:20:35.440] I hope that helps. [00:20:35.440 --> 00:20:38.160] All right, back to John in New York. [00:20:38.160 --> 00:20:41.920] Well, the first problem is, [00:20:41.920 --> 00:20:46.800] they gave her a breathalyzer test and she failed, right? [00:20:46.800 --> 00:20:49.800] >> That's correct, yeah, the passenger driver. [00:20:49.800 --> 00:20:53.720] >> No, no, no, no, see, that's where you're wrong. [00:20:53.720 --> 00:20:55.480] You are mistaken. [00:20:55.480 --> 00:21:00.760] The moment she slid to the driver's side beneath the wheel with the keys in the car, [00:21:00.760 --> 00:21:03.920] she was no longer just the passenger. [00:21:03.920 --> 00:21:07.320] She was the person with potential control of the vehicle. [00:21:09.440 --> 00:21:14.240] And is now subject to a DWI just as much as someone that had been taken [00:21:14.240 --> 00:21:17.000] it down the road a few minutes before. [00:21:17.000 --> 00:21:20.200] >> Yeah, but the cops saw her slide over. [00:21:20.200 --> 00:21:23.680] >> Irrelevant, isn't it? [00:21:23.680 --> 00:21:27.080] She was in a position of control of the car and [00:21:27.080 --> 00:21:30.760] she was impaired when she took the test, correct? [00:21:30.760 --> 00:21:36.160] >> Yep, but the car was- >> Had she not taken the test and [00:21:36.160 --> 00:21:40.640] had no evidence against her as to what the blood alcohol was, [00:21:40.640 --> 00:21:43.640] this might be a different story. [00:21:43.640 --> 00:21:46.520] But as it stands with the facts you've given me, [00:21:46.520 --> 00:21:49.200] there is nothing wrong with what's going on here. [00:21:49.200 --> 00:21:52.000] Cops saw her do it or not, irrelevant. [00:21:52.000 --> 00:21:55.840] Once she got behind the wheel, she is now in potential control of the car. [00:21:55.840 --> 00:22:00.040] And in most states now, that's all it takes. [00:22:00.040 --> 00:22:02.920] >> You've gotta be joking. [00:22:02.920 --> 00:22:04.240] >> No, I'm not joking. [00:22:04.240 --> 00:22:08.560] [BLANK_AUDIO] [00:22:08.560 --> 00:22:10.440] The cop. [00:22:10.440 --> 00:22:13.120] >> If the keys had not been in the ignition and [00:22:13.120 --> 00:22:17.200] the engine had been off, that would be a whole nother matter. [00:22:17.200 --> 00:22:19.200] >> I think the engine was off. [00:22:19.200 --> 00:22:21.960] >> Where were the keys, John? [00:22:21.960 --> 00:22:25.720] >> Probably in the ignition. [00:22:25.720 --> 00:22:29.760] >> Probably, which means the car could have been started and driven, right? [00:22:29.760 --> 00:22:33.560] >> It could have been started and driven, but it wasn't. [00:22:33.560 --> 00:22:35.760] >> And with her behind the wheel, right? [00:22:35.760 --> 00:22:40.080] >> Yeah, well- >> That she was in potential control of [00:22:40.080 --> 00:22:41.600] the car while she was impaired. [00:22:41.600 --> 00:22:44.800] That's exactly how they're going to see it. [00:22:44.800 --> 00:22:48.400] [BLANK_AUDIO] [00:22:48.400 --> 00:22:50.720] >> That's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard. [00:22:50.720 --> 00:22:52.280] I'm not saying you're- >> Well, [00:22:52.280 --> 00:22:57.080] if you take the statute literally, they couldn't do it that way. [00:22:57.080 --> 00:23:01.200] But because the statutes somewhere has the language, [00:23:01.200 --> 00:23:05.280] must be liberally construed so as to do such and such. [00:23:05.280 --> 00:23:09.440] They will extend it that way and they will get away with it. [00:23:09.440 --> 00:23:13.440] They've been doing it for decades. [00:23:13.440 --> 00:23:15.840] >> I'm not saying you're wrong, [00:23:15.840 --> 00:23:19.640] I'm saying that's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard of. [00:23:19.640 --> 00:23:21.240] >> I know I'm not wrong. [00:23:21.240 --> 00:23:23.040] I absolutely know I'm not wrong. [00:23:23.040 --> 00:23:26.760] >> Yeah, no, I agree, I agree. [00:23:26.760 --> 00:23:28.600] I understand that. [00:23:28.600 --> 00:23:30.880] But there's something that something really stinks there. [00:23:30.880 --> 00:23:36.440] >> Well, like I said, that's the problem with a regulatory code that has [00:23:36.440 --> 00:23:38.960] the language liberally construed. [00:23:38.960 --> 00:23:43.120] They liberally construed a regulatory code in a way that violates the rights [00:23:43.120 --> 00:23:47.800] that they are supposed to be liberally construed in favor of the people. [00:23:47.800 --> 00:23:52.760] The whole system is set up to be completely bass-ackwards right now. [00:23:52.760 --> 00:23:55.760] >> Yeah, but what about jurisprudence? [00:23:57.480 --> 00:23:58.720] I mean- >> I'm telling you what [00:23:58.720 --> 00:24:00.680] the jurisprudence is going to say. [00:24:00.680 --> 00:24:04.240] >> You're kidding. [00:24:04.240 --> 00:24:05.560] >> No. >> Okay, well, [00:24:05.560 --> 00:24:06.560] I'll take your word for it. [00:24:06.560 --> 00:24:09.440] >> You don't have to take my word for it. [00:24:09.440 --> 00:24:13.600] You can look up all kinds of DWI cases in virtually every state, and [00:24:13.600 --> 00:24:17.840] you're gonna find one where they, at least one, where that's what they've said. [00:24:17.840 --> 00:24:23.960] >> [COUGH] Well, that's a new one on me. [00:24:23.960 --> 00:24:26.280] Okay, but I'm listening. [00:24:27.760 --> 00:24:29.800] What would you do besides get fried? [00:24:29.800 --> 00:24:33.560] >> She should have stayed in the passenger seat. [00:24:33.560 --> 00:24:35.360] Had she done that, she would have been fine. [00:24:35.360 --> 00:24:39.480] >> [COUGH] >> She should not have taken a breathalyzer. [00:24:39.480 --> 00:24:41.520] Had she not done that, she would have been fine. [00:24:41.520 --> 00:24:47.640] >> In other words, when a cop stops you, you can refuse, [00:24:47.640 --> 00:24:50.760] obviously, the Fifth Amendment, you can refuse a breathalyzer. [00:24:50.760 --> 00:24:53.480] >> Here's the thing. [00:24:53.480 --> 00:24:56.320] Most states have a statute that says if you refuse, [00:24:56.320 --> 00:24:59.120] they'll automatically suspend your driver's license. [00:24:59.120 --> 00:25:03.480] The problem is, when they go to trial, for them anyway, [00:25:03.480 --> 00:25:08.600] is when they go to trial, they don't have any proof of DWI, okay? [00:25:08.600 --> 00:25:11.880] There's no breathalyzer, there's no test. [00:25:11.880 --> 00:25:18.200] There's no pass/fail quotient that depends entirely upon how the cop sees things. [00:25:18.200 --> 00:25:19.160] Okay? >> Right. [00:25:19.160 --> 00:25:23.160] >> If you don't take them, now, if they can't convict you of DWI, [00:25:23.160 --> 00:25:25.040] do they have to reinstate your license? [00:25:25.040 --> 00:25:30.800] >> So the best thing to do is never take a breathalyzer. [00:25:30.800 --> 00:25:36.520] >> You never take the field sobriety test of any kind, period. [00:25:36.520 --> 00:25:40.960] You always refuse, you always law your up. [00:25:40.960 --> 00:25:43.440] You do nothing without a lawyer. [00:25:43.440 --> 00:25:45.400] When are people gonna learn this? [00:25:45.400 --> 00:25:49.960] >> I know, I know, I know. [00:25:51.480 --> 00:25:57.640] As you have very aptly put it, and very wisely stated many times, [00:25:57.640 --> 00:26:02.320] when you're dealing with a police officer, you're polite, you're respectful, [00:26:02.320 --> 00:26:08.800] you shut up, then you shut up some more, and then you keep shutting up. [00:26:08.800 --> 00:26:10.600] >> Yep, that's exactly right. [00:26:10.600 --> 00:26:18.240] >> And that's, and I, that's the best way I've ever heard it free, by the way. [00:26:18.240 --> 00:26:24.120] So, so I'm gonna come away with, she shouldn't have slid over. [00:26:24.120 --> 00:26:27.280] She should not have taken the breathalyzer. [00:26:27.280 --> 00:26:32.880] >> And she never should have engaged the cop in any form of conversation. [00:26:32.880 --> 00:26:37.800] The first words out of everybody's mouth in that car, I want my lawyer. [00:26:37.800 --> 00:26:39.880] >> That's right. [00:26:39.880 --> 00:26:45.560] >> The moment they said that, the cop could no longer ask them questions. [00:26:47.760 --> 00:26:53.880] >> Well, he, even if he could, then all they gotta do is shut up. [00:26:53.880 --> 00:26:59.880] >> All they gotta do is keep repeating the same mantra, I want my lawyer. [00:26:59.880 --> 00:27:00.840] Well, man, where were you going? [00:27:00.840 --> 00:27:02.240] I want my lawyer. [00:27:02.240 --> 00:27:03.440] Well, where were you coming from? [00:27:03.440 --> 00:27:04.600] I want my lawyer. [00:27:04.600 --> 00:27:07.280] >> Yep. [00:27:07.280 --> 00:27:12.720] All right, what would you suggest besides get a good lawyer? [00:27:12.720 --> 00:27:17.720] >> [LAUGH] >> Well, I can't answer that. [00:27:17.720 --> 00:27:19.240] I don't know the people you're talking about. [00:27:19.240 --> 00:27:21.840] I don't know what they're capable of or what they're not capable of. [00:27:21.840 --> 00:27:27.840] The only reason I tell people to get a lawyer is because I know well enough that [00:27:27.840 --> 00:27:30.040] they don't know enough to do it themselves. [00:27:30.040 --> 00:27:32.720] >> Yeah, yeah. [00:27:32.720 --> 00:27:35.320] All right. >> Now, [00:27:35.320 --> 00:27:38.600] considering the fact that they've got messed up this far, [00:27:38.600 --> 00:27:42.560] the obvious answer is they do not know how to do this for themselves. [00:27:43.200 --> 00:27:46.840] They're absolutely incapable of doing this for themselves. [00:27:46.840 --> 00:27:47.520] >> You're not kidding. [00:27:47.520 --> 00:27:53.480] Yeah, they don't know the basic things. [00:27:53.480 --> 00:27:59.440] >> [COUGH] And that's gonna be the problem for most people. [00:27:59.440 --> 00:28:03.680] They open their mouth when they shouldn't, they say things they shouldn't, [00:28:03.680 --> 00:28:06.920] they do things they shouldn't, they agree to things they shouldn't, and [00:28:06.920 --> 00:28:09.200] they never bother to ask for their lawyer. [00:28:12.000 --> 00:28:12.500] >> Yep. [00:28:12.500 --> 00:28:16.640] All right, any suggestions? [00:28:16.640 --> 00:28:22.840] >> Well, tell her to take singing lessons. [00:28:22.840 --> 00:28:26.680] She's gonna need the breath control to blow into that thing to start her car for [00:28:26.680 --> 00:28:27.180] a while. [00:28:27.180 --> 00:28:31.480] >> Okay, I understand. [00:28:31.480 --> 00:28:36.360] >> All right, anything else? [00:28:36.360 --> 00:28:41.080] >> No, it looks like she screwed pretty good, doesn't it? [00:28:41.080 --> 00:28:44.440] >> Well, it usually works that way when you're the one that did it to yourself. [00:28:44.440 --> 00:28:50.920] >> Yep, so I come away with, don't slide over, [00:28:50.920 --> 00:28:59.280] don't take a breathalyzer, and every question, I want my lawyer. [00:28:59.280 --> 00:29:02.480] >> Yeah, and the girl behind the wheel should have just stayed there and [00:29:02.480 --> 00:29:03.760] done the exact same thing. [00:29:03.760 --> 00:29:08.880] >> [COUGH] Yep, so they automatically, [00:29:08.880 --> 00:29:11.280] I knew that they automatically suspend your license. [00:29:11.280 --> 00:29:13.940] But then if there's no breathalyzer, you go to court and say, [00:29:13.940 --> 00:29:16.880] your honor, they suspended my license. [00:29:16.880 --> 00:29:21.640] There's no proof that there was any DWI. [00:29:21.640 --> 00:29:23.040] I want my license back. [00:29:23.040 --> 00:29:24.760] That's the way it works, doesn't it? [00:29:24.760 --> 00:29:25.260] >> Exactly. [00:29:25.260 --> 00:29:30.360] >> Okay, thank you very kindly. [00:29:30.360 --> 00:29:32.440] [MUSIC] [00:29:32.440 --> 00:29:36.880] >> Okay, all right, that's it. [00:29:36.880 --> 00:29:37.380] Bye-bye. [00:29:37.380 --> 00:29:43.640] >> Now, again, folks, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number. [00:29:43.640 --> 00:29:45.080] We got another break coming up. [00:29:45.080 --> 00:29:48.480] I need somebody to talk to, cuz like I say, I didn't have time to prepare a whole lot [00:29:48.480 --> 00:29:49.240] for the show tonight. [00:29:49.240 --> 00:29:52.080] So I would like to have some callers on the board if you're out there and [00:29:52.080 --> 00:29:52.760] listening. [00:29:52.760 --> 00:29:56.520] Y'all hang on here, and we will be right back after this upcoming break. [00:29:56.520 --> 00:30:02.240] [MUSIC] [00:30:02.240 --> 00:30:06.240] >> Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been [00:30:06.240 --> 00:30:08.600] driving under the blood alcohol limit. [00:30:08.600 --> 00:30:12.960] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalyzers and [00:30:12.960 --> 00:30:15.520] a government cover-up in a moment. [00:30:15.520 --> 00:30:17.480] >> Privacy is under attack. [00:30:17.480 --> 00:30:21.080] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:30:21.080 --> 00:30:25.840] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:30:25.840 --> 00:30:28.880] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and [00:30:28.880 --> 00:30:31.120] keep your information to yourself. [00:30:31.120 --> 00:30:33.600] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:30:33.600 --> 00:30:37.160] >> This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, [00:30:37.160 --> 00:30:41.120] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:30:41.120 --> 00:30:43.240] Start over with Startpage. [00:30:43.240 --> 00:30:46.960] >> Ever hear the term fine farming? [00:30:46.960 --> 00:30:51.200] It's when cops fine innocent people to bring in revenue in its apparently big [00:30:51.200 --> 00:30:53.800] business in the sunshine state of Florida. [00:30:53.800 --> 00:30:58.120] This case involves breathalyzers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for [00:30:58.120 --> 00:30:59.760] DUI violations. [00:30:59.760 --> 00:31:04.240] Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated. [00:31:04.240 --> 00:31:08.080] State officials knew about it for two and a half years, but did nothing. [00:31:08.080 --> 00:31:11.000] In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program [00:31:11.000 --> 00:31:14.160] ordered inspectors not to document the problem. [00:31:14.160 --> 00:31:17.000] A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life, but [00:31:17.000 --> 00:31:20.880] now that the cover-up has been exposed, perhaps Florida drivers can breathe [00:31:20.880 --> 00:31:22.480] a bit easier. [00:31:22.480 --> 00:31:23.600] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. [00:31:23.600 --> 00:31:26.560] More news and information at katherinealbrecht.com. [00:31:26.560 --> 00:31:30.600] [MUSIC] [00:31:30.600 --> 00:31:34.920] >> This is building seven, a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of [00:31:34.920 --> 00:31:36.040] September 11th. [00:31:36.040 --> 00:31:37.920] >> The government says that fire brought it down. [00:31:37.920 --> 00:31:43.080] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [00:31:43.080 --> 00:31:45.880] >> Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [00:31:45.880 --> 00:31:48.640] >> And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [00:31:48.640 --> 00:31:50.120] >> I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [00:31:50.120 --> 00:31:51.000] >> I'm a structural engineer. [00:31:51.000 --> 00:31:52.480] >> I'm a New York City correction officer. [00:31:52.480 --> 00:31:53.440] >> I'm an Air Force pilot. [00:31:53.440 --> 00:31:55.040] >> I'm a father who lost his son. [00:31:55.040 --> 00:31:57.680] >> We're Americans and we deserve the truth. [00:31:57.680 --> 00:32:00.560] >> Go to rememberbuilding7.org today. [00:32:00.560 --> 00:32:02.200] [MUSIC] [00:32:02.200 --> 00:32:05.360] >> Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [00:32:05.360 --> 00:32:07.680] In today's America, we live in an us against them society. [00:32:07.680 --> 00:32:09.960] And if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [00:32:09.960 --> 00:32:12.880] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [00:32:12.880 --> 00:32:15.600] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [00:32:15.600 --> 00:32:18.080] the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, [00:32:18.080 --> 00:32:19.880] the right to due process of law. [00:32:19.880 --> 00:32:23.640] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and [00:32:23.640 --> 00:32:25.720] preserve our rights through due process. [00:32:25.720 --> 00:32:28.720] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [00:32:28.720 --> 00:32:31.720] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help [00:32:31.720 --> 00:32:35.480] you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law. [00:32:35.480 --> 00:32:38.040] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to [00:32:38.040 --> 00:32:40.800] ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [00:32:40.800 --> 00:32:42.800] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, [00:32:42.800 --> 00:32:45.400] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie. [00:32:45.400 --> 00:32:49.280] Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and [00:32:49.280 --> 00:32:50.800] other useful resource material. [00:32:50.800 --> 00:32:54.760] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [00:32:54.760 --> 00:32:58.760] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [00:32:58.760 --> 00:33:02.400] [MUSIC] [00:33:02.400 --> 00:33:06.720] >> Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [00:33:06.720 --> 00:33:16.720] [MUSIC] [00:33:16.720 --> 00:33:26.720] [MUSIC] [00:33:26.720 --> 00:33:36.040] >> All right, folks, we are back. [00:33:36.040 --> 00:33:42.880] This is Rule of Law Radio, call in number 512-646-1984. [00:33:42.880 --> 00:33:48.520] And I have a caller up on the board, but I cannot, for the life of me, [00:33:48.520 --> 00:33:51.600] see who this would be. [00:33:51.600 --> 00:33:57.160] Area code 949, hello? [00:33:57.160 --> 00:34:02.160] >> Yes, hi, this is EJ, I'm calling from a different number, so it's 949. [00:34:02.160 --> 00:34:03.800] >> Okay, okay. [00:34:03.800 --> 00:34:06.720] >> Second number, thank you so much. [00:34:06.720 --> 00:34:12.760] The first two callers, I learned a lot, especially the last caller with DWI. [00:34:12.760 --> 00:34:16.640] I don't know why they call it a DWI, I thought it was a DUI. [00:34:16.640 --> 00:34:20.600] >> It depends, it varies from state to state. [00:34:20.600 --> 00:34:25.280] Some say driving while under the influence, and [00:34:25.280 --> 00:34:28.800] then others say driving under the influence. [00:34:28.800 --> 00:34:35.440] >> Under the influence, okay, yeah, my call is, [00:34:35.440 --> 00:34:40.400] okay, so I filed a summary judgment on [00:34:40.400 --> 00:34:46.320] the state court case against the hospital. [00:34:46.320 --> 00:34:51.520] So this is EJ, I had that assault and battery case against me. [00:34:51.520 --> 00:34:53.640] >> Mm-hm. [00:34:53.640 --> 00:34:59.120] >> And now since that's over, the case was dismissed, [00:34:59.120 --> 00:35:04.480] I have a lawsuit against the hospital. [00:35:04.480 --> 00:35:08.840] So I'm still trying to find the security guard, locate him. [00:35:08.840 --> 00:35:12.280] >> Yes, ma'am. [00:35:12.280 --> 00:35:20.880] >> So he no longer works at the hospital, we've already tried to serve him. [00:35:20.880 --> 00:35:27.400] The best way is two options, first is request for production. [00:35:27.400 --> 00:35:34.360] I've already filed my summary judgment because they filed an answer after 30 days. [00:35:34.360 --> 00:35:38.720] So they're past the 30 days, that's filed already. [00:35:38.720 --> 00:35:44.600] Do you recommend, I do need to go to the library, probably the vendors. [00:35:44.600 --> 00:35:49.800] I heard vendors is really good, I'm sorry, a lot of questions. [00:35:49.800 --> 00:35:54.520] First is the request for production or subpoena. [00:35:54.520 --> 00:36:00.160] If you were in my position, which way would you go? [00:36:00.160 --> 00:36:05.600] The request for protection or subpoena? [00:36:05.600 --> 00:36:09.040] Cuz I need at least one identifier, I can't locate him. [00:36:09.040 --> 00:36:13.880] And I need to locate him before the conference call, [00:36:13.880 --> 00:36:17.880] the status conference, which is in June. [00:36:17.880 --> 00:36:22.160] >> Well, I'm not really sure how you want me to answer that. [00:36:22.160 --> 00:36:30.560] I remember talking about the lawsuit and all that other stuff. [00:36:30.560 --> 00:36:35.200] But what are you talking about with the identifier part? [00:36:36.560 --> 00:36:39.040] >> I only know his name. [00:36:39.040 --> 00:36:42.960] >> You're talking about for the security guard, not for you. [00:36:42.960 --> 00:36:46.000] >> Yeah, correct. [00:36:46.000 --> 00:36:52.280] >> Well, again, did you name his employer in the suit? [00:36:52.280 --> 00:36:55.200] >> Yes, definitely. [00:36:55.200 --> 00:36:57.600] >> As respondent superior for him? [00:36:57.600 --> 00:37:00.880] >> Yes, exactly. [00:37:00.880 --> 00:37:07.920] >> Okay, then you can demand access to the records of his employment. [00:37:07.920 --> 00:37:12.040] You do that in discovery. [00:37:12.040 --> 00:37:17.360] >> You just tell me that, yeah. [00:37:17.360 --> 00:37:20.440] It's not a pre-discovery, right? [00:37:20.440 --> 00:37:24.360] Cuz in California, they do have a pre-discovery phase. [00:37:24.360 --> 00:37:28.440] >> Well, if you've already filed, then it's not pre, it's ongoing. [00:37:30.360 --> 00:37:34.440] If you haven't filed, then yeah, it'll be pre-discovery. [00:37:34.440 --> 00:37:39.560] >> When you say filed, what does that mean? [00:37:39.560 --> 00:37:40.800] >> The lawsuit. [00:37:40.800 --> 00:37:47.200] >> [LAUGH] Sorry, I didn't know. [00:37:47.200 --> 00:37:50.920] Well, yeah, it's not pre-discovery then, disaster. [00:37:50.920 --> 00:37:52.200] I've already filed the lawsuit. [00:37:52.200 --> 00:37:58.240] >> It's kind of strange because the hospital's attorneys, [00:37:58.240 --> 00:38:02.440] they sent me all these interrogatories, [00:38:02.440 --> 00:38:06.560] production of documents and so forth. [00:38:06.560 --> 00:38:09.240] And that was after the lawsuit. [00:38:09.240 --> 00:38:13.440] And they call it, within their letter, initial discovery. [00:38:13.440 --> 00:38:15.880] They didn't say pre-discovery, initial discovery. [00:38:19.880 --> 00:38:20.880] >> I've already got that answer. [00:38:20.880 --> 00:38:23.640] >> Have you filed initial discovery since you filed the suit? [00:38:23.640 --> 00:38:26.920] >> No, I didn't. [00:38:26.920 --> 00:38:32.760] I should have used that great option, but I did not. [00:38:32.760 --> 00:38:35.320] >> Well, if you didn't do any discovery, [00:38:35.320 --> 00:38:38.040] what are you gonna be using as evidence in this case? [00:38:38.040 --> 00:38:46.520] >> Well, I mean, as evidence? [00:38:46.520 --> 00:38:50.040] I mean, the case is a mess. [00:38:50.040 --> 00:38:58.720] It was out of sheer malicious prosecution against me. [00:38:58.720 --> 00:39:02.760] >> No, not the case against you, your lawsuit against them. [00:39:02.760 --> 00:39:06.160] What are you going to be using as evidence against them if you haven't done [00:39:06.160 --> 00:39:06.880] discovery? [00:39:06.880 --> 00:39:12.520] >> Well, I have evidence from public [00:39:12.520 --> 00:39:18.440] records response from the chief [00:39:18.440 --> 00:39:31.920] of police and that- >> How did you get that? [00:39:31.920 --> 00:39:37.680] >> The case is through a public request. [00:39:37.680 --> 00:39:39.680] >> And you think that's all that you actually need? [00:39:39.680 --> 00:39:45.680] >> [LAUGH] >> You better believe there's going to be [00:39:45.680 --> 00:39:46.800] more. [00:39:46.800 --> 00:39:50.640] The more you can get your hands on to prove everything you're claiming, [00:39:50.640 --> 00:39:53.840] the better off you are, okay? [00:39:53.840 --> 00:39:58.400] Once you got through a public information request, okay, [00:39:58.400 --> 00:40:02.840] they can prevent you from putting it into the record at trial because you didn't [00:40:02.840 --> 00:40:04.520] request it through discovery. [00:40:04.520 --> 00:40:09.640] Therefore, they have no reason to believe it's attached to this case. [00:40:09.640 --> 00:40:13.520] You would have to get on the stand or you would have to put someone else on the stand [00:40:13.520 --> 00:40:16.000] to testify as to what you have and where you got it. [00:40:16.000 --> 00:40:22.560] Okay? [00:40:22.560 --> 00:40:26.240] So unless you got certified copies of everything, [00:40:26.240 --> 00:40:29.480] you can't just submit them into the court record and say, here's my evidence. [00:40:29.480 --> 00:40:34.920] Did you get certified copies of everything? [00:40:34.920 --> 00:40:40.200] >> No, how do I get certified copies? [00:40:40.200 --> 00:40:44.680] >> Well, certified copies cost money and certified copies are the only records that [00:40:44.680 --> 00:40:49.680] are self-substantiating for admissibility into the record as evidence. [00:40:53.960 --> 00:40:57.560] >> And I think subpoena would probably be the best way, I think. [00:40:57.560 --> 00:41:05.320] >> Discovery would be your best way to get everything you need. [00:41:05.320 --> 00:41:13.240] A subpoena you wanna use if you're calling a person to court and [00:41:13.240 --> 00:41:17.160] they have particular records that only they possess that you want them to bring [00:41:17.160 --> 00:41:19.800] with them, then you can do a subpoena deus ex tecum. [00:41:21.160 --> 00:41:26.000] But for the most part, you can't do public information requests and [00:41:26.000 --> 00:41:31.560] things of that nature for something that is discoverable for the actual lawsuit. [00:41:31.560 --> 00:41:34.960] If you wanna admit it into court, you need to get it through discovery. [00:41:34.960 --> 00:41:41.040] Because they have to supply it to you by the order of the court if you get it [00:41:41.040 --> 00:41:42.240] through discovery. [00:41:42.240 --> 00:41:44.200] That's what makes it admissible. [00:41:44.200 --> 00:41:47.800] Because they're gonna certify everything they sent to you. [00:41:47.800 --> 00:41:50.600] And they're going to file that certification with the court that they [00:41:50.600 --> 00:41:53.680] responded to your request with all these records. [00:41:53.680 --> 00:41:57.960] [BLANK_AUDIO] [00:41:57.960 --> 00:41:59.520] >> Okay. [00:41:59.520 --> 00:42:03.960] >> The only other thing you can use is certified copies of whatever records [00:42:03.960 --> 00:42:06.080] you're going to bring yourself. [00:42:06.080 --> 00:42:09.560] [BLANK_AUDIO] [00:42:09.560 --> 00:42:11.960] And then that only works if they're public records. [00:42:11.960 --> 00:42:14.080] [BLANK_AUDIO] [00:42:14.080 --> 00:42:14.960] >> Public records? [00:42:14.960 --> 00:42:17.360] [BLANK_AUDIO] [00:42:17.360 --> 00:42:22.440] >> Yeah, like the police reports and the court record from the previous [00:42:22.440 --> 00:42:25.880] prosecution and all that, that was dismissed. [00:42:25.880 --> 00:42:26.960] [BLANK_AUDIO] [00:42:26.960 --> 00:42:31.160] >> I see, okay. [00:42:31.160 --> 00:42:36.520] I mean, I did a public records request, but it wasn't certified, so. [00:42:36.520 --> 00:42:39.680] >> Well, the records request isn't what's certified. [00:42:39.680 --> 00:42:44.600] What you get back is what you request as certified. [00:42:44.600 --> 00:42:47.880] When you send in the public records request, you say, [00:42:47.880 --> 00:42:52.400] I hereby request certified copies of the following documents or records. [00:42:52.400 --> 00:42:54.200] >> I see. [00:42:54.200 --> 00:42:56.840] [BLANK_AUDIO] [00:42:56.840 --> 00:43:01.400] >> And if you don't do that, they don't come back certified. [00:43:01.400 --> 00:43:05.120] >> Wow, okay. [00:43:05.120 --> 00:43:12.160] So I have to do a second one to the new- >> Well, as I said, do discovery. [00:43:12.160 --> 00:43:16.680] Then you don't have to pay for certified copies. [00:43:16.680 --> 00:43:21.480] >> I see, okay. [00:43:21.480 --> 00:43:26.440] I know you did tell me just, I think a month ago, [00:43:26.440 --> 00:43:32.440] during our live show broadcast, so I need to re-listen to that one. [00:43:32.440 --> 00:43:37.840] And okay, thank you so much. [00:43:37.840 --> 00:43:38.720] >> You're welcome. [00:43:38.720 --> 00:43:39.800] >> That's all I needed to say. [00:43:39.800 --> 00:43:41.760] >> Okay. [00:43:41.760 --> 00:43:42.880] All right, bye. [00:43:42.880 --> 00:43:43.880] >> Bye-bye. [00:43:43.880 --> 00:43:49.000] [MUSIC] [00:43:49.000 --> 00:43:50.560] All right, folks, we're about to take a break. [00:43:50.560 --> 00:43:53.600] Y'all hang on, 512-646-1984. [00:43:53.600 --> 00:43:54.880] We will be right back. [00:43:54.880 --> 00:44:00.680] [MUSIC] [00:44:00.680 --> 00:44:03.800] >> Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [00:44:03.800 --> 00:44:08.400] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, [00:44:08.400 --> 00:44:15.400] easy-to-understand, four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [00:44:15.400 --> 00:44:19.080] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [00:44:19.080 --> 00:44:22.920] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [00:44:22.920 --> 00:44:27.800] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [00:44:27.800 --> 00:44:30.920] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney [00:44:30.920 --> 00:44:34.400] with 22 years of case-winning experience. [00:44:34.400 --> 00:44:38.840] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [00:44:38.840 --> 00:44:43.280] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [00:44:43.280 --> 00:44:48.240] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for [00:44:48.240 --> 00:44:52.080] civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [00:44:52.080 --> 00:44:56.440] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or [00:44:56.440 --> 00:45:00.080] call toll-free 866-LAW-EASY. [00:45:00.080 --> 00:45:02.360] >> I love logos. [00:45:02.360 --> 00:45:06.040] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [00:45:06.040 --> 00:45:08.680] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [00:45:08.680 --> 00:45:09.880] I need my truth fixed. [00:45:09.880 --> 00:45:11.720] I'd be lost without logos. [00:45:11.720 --> 00:45:14.560] And I really wanna help keep this network on the air. [00:45:14.560 --> 00:45:17.520] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and [00:45:17.520 --> 00:45:21.600] I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements. [00:45:21.600 --> 00:45:23.280] How can I help logos? [00:45:23.280 --> 00:45:25.120] >> Well, I'm glad you asked. [00:45:25.120 --> 00:45:28.400] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. [00:45:28.400 --> 00:45:30.520] You can order them your supplies or holiday gifts. [00:45:30.520 --> 00:45:32.600] First thing you do is clear your cookies. [00:45:32.600 --> 00:45:36.000] Now, go to logosradionetwork.com. [00:45:36.000 --> 00:45:38.960] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [00:45:38.960 --> 00:45:42.760] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and [00:45:42.760 --> 00:45:44.640] logos gets a few pesos. [00:45:44.640 --> 00:45:45.560] >> Do I pay extra? [00:45:45.560 --> 00:45:46.120] >> No. [00:45:46.120 --> 00:45:48.400] >> Do I have to do anything different when I order? [00:45:48.400 --> 00:45:48.960] >> No. [00:45:48.960 --> 00:45:50.480] >> Can I use my Amazon Prime? [00:45:50.480 --> 00:45:51.280] >> No. [00:45:51.280 --> 00:45:52.080] I mean, yes. [00:45:52.080 --> 00:45:55.440] >> Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money. [00:45:55.440 --> 00:45:57.000] This is perfect. [00:45:57.000 --> 00:45:58.120] Thank you so much. [00:45:58.120 --> 00:45:59.600] >> You're welcome. [00:45:59.600 --> 00:46:01.600] >> Happy holidays, logos. [00:46:01.600 --> 00:46:11.600] [MUSIC] [00:46:11.600 --> 00:46:21.600] [MUSIC] [00:46:21.600 --> 00:46:31.600] [MUSIC] [00:46:31.600 --> 00:46:41.600] [MUSIC] [00:46:41.600 --> 00:46:51.600] [MUSIC] [00:46:51.600 --> 00:47:09.600] >> All right, folks, we are back. [00:47:09.600 --> 00:47:15.440] This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984. [00:47:15.440 --> 00:47:16.920] You want to call and ask a question? [00:47:16.920 --> 00:47:19.240] [MUSIC] [00:47:19.240 --> 00:47:22.560] I got to tell you, folks, while I'm trying to get this book done and [00:47:22.560 --> 00:47:25.160] all the other stuff I've got on my plate at the moment, [00:47:25.160 --> 00:47:26.760] this has been very, very hectic. [00:47:26.760 --> 00:47:30.480] I do apologize for my absence from the show. [00:47:30.480 --> 00:47:33.760] It's just so hard to get all that stuff juggled around and [00:47:33.760 --> 00:47:37.640] ready to go and actually sleep at the same time. [00:47:37.640 --> 00:47:40.960] So I do apologize. [00:47:40.960 --> 00:47:44.840] But let me say that the folks that have been kept on donating through thick and [00:47:44.840 --> 00:47:48.960] thin even when I wasn't here to do the show, I appreciate you guys so much. [00:47:48.960 --> 00:47:49.680] Thank y'all. [00:47:49.680 --> 00:47:54.080] There's no way we could survive at this without you guys. [00:47:54.080 --> 00:47:59.720] It's just so much going on and so much to do and just us to do it. [00:47:59.720 --> 00:48:01.440] I do all this work by myself. [00:48:01.440 --> 00:48:03.400] There's nobody here to help me. [00:48:03.400 --> 00:48:06.120] I don't have too many people to bounce it off of, [00:48:06.120 --> 00:48:08.240] because everybody's got their own lives and schedules. [00:48:08.240 --> 00:48:13.800] And very few people have delved into this subject to the depth that I have. [00:48:13.800 --> 00:48:17.360] And the few that have are so busy with the other stuff they're working on, [00:48:17.360 --> 00:48:20.160] they don't have time to sit down and review mine to see whether or [00:48:20.160 --> 00:48:24.440] not it's clear enough for the layman to understand it. [00:48:24.440 --> 00:48:28.280] So given that, it takes a lot out of me and [00:48:28.280 --> 00:48:30.560] sometimes I am just not up for sitting here. [00:48:30.560 --> 00:48:34.880] I've got something going on with my knee right now that makes sitting down for [00:48:34.880 --> 00:48:38.040] any length of time an extremely painful experience. [00:48:38.040 --> 00:48:42.160] And even though I'm feeling it now, I knew I had to do a show tonight because I've [00:48:42.160 --> 00:48:47.600] been gone off this thing too long, but I still need some people to talk to, all right? [00:48:47.600 --> 00:48:51.520] I wished I'd have been able to prepare material for tonight, but I didn't. [00:48:51.520 --> 00:48:52.800] I just did not have the time. [00:48:52.800 --> 00:48:56.760] So if you're out there and you're listening and you have a question, [00:48:56.760 --> 00:49:00.960] a comment, or whatever, please feel free to call in and talk to us. [00:49:00.960 --> 00:49:05.880] Now I've got some young lady that has sent me an email about [00:49:05.880 --> 00:49:10.440] speeding tickets that her and her son have both gotten in Pasadena, Texas. [00:49:10.440 --> 00:49:16.840] But I can't respond to her email because everything that goes to her work [00:49:16.840 --> 00:49:19.120] email address is getting blocked and rejected. [00:49:19.120 --> 00:49:24.640] So fortunately, she attached her phone number to this thing, so [00:49:24.640 --> 00:49:28.520] I had to send her a text message while we were on break to ask her if she wanted to [00:49:28.520 --> 00:49:33.240] get some answers to her questions, now would be a good time by calling into the show here. [00:49:33.240 --> 00:49:38.880] Now guys, one thing about the new seminar book, okay? [00:49:38.880 --> 00:49:44.080] It is going to be much larger than the other book, okay? [00:49:44.080 --> 00:49:47.400] The other book, I can't remember exactly how many pages it was, and [00:49:47.400 --> 00:49:50.520] I know it went into a lot of stuff, it didn't really need to. [00:49:50.520 --> 00:49:56.040] The new one is going into everything in very great depth and detail. [00:49:56.040 --> 00:50:01.000] It is linking together all of the pieces that you need to know about, but [00:50:01.000 --> 00:50:08.320] most people don't understand how to look up and locate and find and associate. [00:50:08.320 --> 00:50:12.000] So I am going in and doing all of that for you. [00:50:12.000 --> 00:50:17.160] Just the discussion on person is 20 something pages long, okay? [00:50:17.160 --> 00:50:21.200] But there are a ton of statutes in the transportation code and [00:50:21.200 --> 00:50:26.680] in the other codes in general that define the term person various ways for [00:50:26.680 --> 00:50:32.800] various reasons, and so to help people better understand how that term works, [00:50:32.800 --> 00:50:35.240] it took a lot to explain it. [00:50:35.240 --> 00:50:38.480] I'm hoping I did not make it overly complicated. [00:50:38.480 --> 00:50:41.720] I've sent it to a couple of people that I know don't have a lot of experience at [00:50:41.720 --> 00:50:42.920] this to read. [00:50:42.920 --> 00:50:45.800] They said they could read and understand it just fine, but [00:50:45.800 --> 00:50:51.360] when I go back and look at it, I'm just worried that that's not gonna be the case. [00:50:51.360 --> 00:50:52.480] I don't know why. [00:50:52.480 --> 00:50:55.520] I should trust that they know what they're talking about, that they understood it and [00:50:55.520 --> 00:50:56.800] they followed it. [00:50:56.800 --> 00:51:02.720] But I'm just trying to find some way to make this stuff less verbose, but [00:51:02.720 --> 00:51:04.000] still make the same point. [00:51:04.000 --> 00:51:10.760] And when it comes to legal dissection and discussion, that is not an easy task. [00:51:10.760 --> 00:51:16.880] You would be surprised how easy it is in a legal discussion that if you break [00:51:16.880 --> 00:51:22.320] a statement up or you accentuate it verbally or written in the wrong place with [00:51:22.320 --> 00:51:29.800] a comma or a semicolon, it completely changes the meaning of what you're saying. [00:51:29.800 --> 00:51:32.640] And what the intent of what you're saying actually was. [00:51:32.640 --> 00:51:37.760] So I have to be extremely careful not to break it someplace where it's going to [00:51:37.760 --> 00:51:40.600] break the logic and break the point. [00:51:41.680 --> 00:51:44.080] And I'm hoping I've done that. [00:51:44.080 --> 00:51:50.160] So I've got a couple other people that actually do know how to read this stuff and [00:51:50.160 --> 00:51:52.720] might have time at some point to look at it. [00:51:52.720 --> 00:51:57.120] But it's been slow going for me because having people to do that review work for [00:51:57.120 --> 00:51:58.600] me is very, very hard to come by. [00:51:58.600 --> 00:52:03.400] That said, I seem to have Jane back up on the board again. [00:52:03.400 --> 00:52:05.440] So let's see what's going on there. [00:52:05.440 --> 00:52:06.600] Jane, you're back. [00:52:06.600 --> 00:52:08.480] >> Hi, Eddie. [00:52:08.480 --> 00:52:11.560] Okay, since nobody's calling yet, I'm going to take advantage. [00:52:11.560 --> 00:52:17.520] Okay, I was wondering where specifically does it say, [00:52:17.520 --> 00:52:21.040] I know I had it in my notes somewhere, but I've got so many notes. [00:52:21.040 --> 00:52:26.360] It says 180 days for they would have to prosecute a despise. [00:52:26.360 --> 00:52:31.160] >> It's not 100, okay. [00:52:31.160 --> 00:52:35.680] It's several court opinions on the subject of speedy trial, okay? [00:52:35.680 --> 00:52:36.680] >> Mm-hm. [00:52:36.680 --> 00:52:39.760] >> I don't know where you got 180 days from. [00:52:39.760 --> 00:52:43.560] They have two years to prosecute a misdemeanor, okay? [00:52:43.560 --> 00:52:44.480] >> Mm-hm. [00:52:44.480 --> 00:52:51.080] >> But that two years is a ticking clock unless one of a couple of things happens. [00:52:51.080 --> 00:52:54.960] A warrant is issued and no arrest is ever made on the warrant. [00:52:54.960 --> 00:52:57.000] That tolls the statute of limitations. [00:52:57.000 --> 00:53:02.920] You file a continuance, that tolls the statute of limitations for [00:53:02.920 --> 00:53:06.120] whatever period the continuance is granted. [00:53:06.120 --> 00:53:09.480] Or if you do a reset, exact same thing, for [00:53:09.480 --> 00:53:12.360] whatever period the time of the reset was for. [00:53:12.360 --> 00:53:19.000] Let's see, or well, actually that's the only two. [00:53:19.000 --> 00:53:21.600] >> Between that and the continuance. [00:53:21.600 --> 00:53:27.320] >> Yeah, but when the other side, the plaintiff, [00:53:27.320 --> 00:53:32.920] the state requests a continuance or a reset, they cannot count that time [00:53:32.920 --> 00:53:36.960] against you, nor take it away from the statute of limitations. [00:53:36.960 --> 00:53:45.120] Now the problem with the speedy trial, once they have filed the complaint, [00:53:45.120 --> 00:53:50.440] Texas courts have already said, you can't say your speedy trial was [00:53:50.440 --> 00:53:53.120] violated at three months, that's too soon. [00:53:53.120 --> 00:53:57.040] But at five months, that's longer than you need. [00:53:57.040 --> 00:54:00.560] So the sweet spot according to the courts is right around four months, [00:54:00.560 --> 00:54:03.200] which would be approximately 120 days. [00:54:03.200 --> 00:54:09.800] If they file the complaint and then fail to prosecute within 120 days, [00:54:09.800 --> 00:54:12.880] then they denied you and your right to a speedy trial. [00:54:12.880 --> 00:54:15.880] However, the issue there is, [00:54:15.880 --> 00:54:19.800] is that you had to raise the issue of speedy trial for that to work. [00:54:19.800 --> 00:54:23.320] Now here's the other side of that coin. [00:54:23.320 --> 00:54:30.040] The statute of limitations is still two years long, okay? [00:54:30.040 --> 00:54:34.680] So they have to do everything within that two year period. [00:54:34.680 --> 00:54:40.880] File the complaint, get the indictment, do the prosecution, and that's that. [00:54:40.880 --> 00:54:43.680] They get it within the two years, fine. [00:54:43.680 --> 00:54:46.600] The problem here is they didn't do that. [00:54:46.600 --> 00:54:53.000] They're way past two years on prosecuting the case, [00:54:53.000 --> 00:54:55.240] despite having filed the complaint. [00:54:55.240 --> 00:54:57.960] You follow? [00:54:57.960 --> 00:55:04.080] >> Okay, but my attorney did have two motions for continuance. [00:55:04.080 --> 00:55:06.840] I know I have to- >> Do you have anything that said they were [00:55:06.840 --> 00:55:07.360] granted? [00:55:07.360 --> 00:55:13.400] Do you have any order that states a period of time they were granted for? [00:55:13.400 --> 00:55:14.600] >> Yes. [00:55:14.600 --> 00:55:16.840] >> Okay, how many days total was that? [00:55:16.840 --> 00:55:20.920] >> Well, okay, that depends, because here's the thing. [00:55:20.920 --> 00:55:24.440] Do you count the days, the time that he sent in the motion, and [00:55:24.440 --> 00:55:27.840] then the time they were granted, which was sometimes two or three days? [00:55:27.840 --> 00:55:29.080] Are those days counted? [00:55:29.080 --> 00:55:37.320] >> The motion is considered filed the day that it's postmarked, [00:55:37.320 --> 00:55:40.880] or the day it's stamped by the court, okay? [00:55:40.880 --> 00:55:42.400] >> Okay. [00:55:42.400 --> 00:55:46.760] >> So- >> If they- [00:55:46.760 --> 00:55:49.440] >> I haven't finished answering your question yet. [00:55:49.440 --> 00:55:50.160] Hang on just a second. [00:55:50.160 --> 00:55:52.120] >> Okay, I'm sorry, sorry, sorry. [00:55:52.120 --> 00:55:56.600] >> So from the day they received it till the day they ruled on it, [00:55:57.720 --> 00:56:00.520] does not count, okay? [00:56:00.520 --> 00:56:02.400] >> Okay. [00:56:02.400 --> 00:56:09.040] >> However, if they rule that it's not granted, it does count. [00:56:09.040 --> 00:56:14.080] >> Okay, so does not count, meaning that it's excluded. [00:56:14.080 --> 00:56:17.360] >> Correct. [00:56:17.360 --> 00:56:22.600] If they grant the continuance, then the maximum they can grant it for [00:56:22.600 --> 00:56:24.920] is 45 days according to Texas law. [00:56:27.040 --> 00:56:31.640] >> So what was the period of time he requested for the continuance? [00:56:31.640 --> 00:56:32.840] >> It was longer than that. [00:56:32.840 --> 00:56:34.640] I mean, well, here's the issue. [00:56:34.640 --> 00:56:38.480] He only filed two motions, and there was four of them done. [00:56:38.480 --> 00:56:40.080] So two of them were done by the court. [00:56:40.080 --> 00:56:48.120] Cuz there was a motion that he filed, and then the next just says email. [00:56:48.120 --> 00:56:53.240] And then there's another motion that he filed, and the next one says court report. [00:56:53.240 --> 00:56:59.400] The one where they filed court report had 257 days from the last day, [00:56:59.400 --> 00:57:04.040] I mean, from the day that we were supposed to go to a hearing. [00:57:04.040 --> 00:57:06.240] All of a sudden, everything just disappeared. [00:57:06.240 --> 00:57:13.000] So and then the court realized it on December 30th, 2021. [00:57:13.000 --> 00:57:18.120] Like, oops, yeah, we forgot, we gotta set this out to a court date. [00:57:18.120 --> 00:57:23.720] So and by that point, 257 days had gone by from the time that I was supposed [00:57:23.720 --> 00:57:29.400] to appear at a hearing that there was no notes about, no nothing about. [00:57:29.400 --> 00:57:34.400] >> I do not believe the municipal court has the power to do a 245-day continuance. [00:57:34.400 --> 00:57:40.240] >> No, I don't either, I don't either, 257 days, actually. [00:57:40.240 --> 00:57:46.480] >> Well, whatever, they don't have 200 days, much less, more than that. [00:57:46.480 --> 00:57:50.040] >> They're gonna use it as excuses, a pandemic and stuff. [00:57:50.040 --> 00:57:52.320] >> They can use all the excuses they want. [00:57:52.320 --> 00:57:54.680] It doesn't stop the statute of limitations. [00:57:54.680 --> 00:57:57.440] It doesn't stop due process. [00:57:57.440 --> 00:58:01.040] >> Not disaster or some other kind of ruling that they would have had, [00:58:01.040 --> 00:58:05.440] temporary ruling for- >> There was nothing in law that allowed [00:58:05.440 --> 00:58:08.960] them to stop holding court, nothing. [00:58:08.960 --> 00:58:11.880] >> Okay, okay. [00:58:11.880 --> 00:58:14.880] >> They don't get to just turn off the justice system and [00:58:14.880 --> 00:58:17.880] make the people being punished by it wait. [00:58:17.880 --> 00:58:19.920] They don't get to do that. [00:58:19.920 --> 00:58:21.720] >> Okay, all right. [00:58:21.720 --> 00:58:23.920] [MUSIC] [00:58:23.920 --> 00:58:26.400] Okay, so that's the big thing right there. [00:58:26.400 --> 00:58:28.840] And even if- >> Okay, well, hang on, [00:58:28.840 --> 00:58:32.040] I got another break coming up and then I'll pick you up, all right? [00:58:32.040 --> 00:58:33.000] >> Okay. [00:58:33.000 --> 00:58:33.520] >> All right, hang on. [00:58:33.520 --> 00:58:38.800] All right, folks, call in number 512-646-1984. [00:58:38.800 --> 00:58:41.200] Give us a call, get in line, we will be right back. [00:58:41.200 --> 00:58:50.120] [MUSIC] [00:58:50.120 --> 00:58:53.400] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet [00:58:53.400 --> 00:58:58.320] countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [00:58:58.320 --> 00:59:02.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but [00:59:02.000 --> 00:59:06.920] in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [00:59:06.920 --> 00:59:09.320] Enter the recovery version. [00:59:09.320 --> 00:59:13.600] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but [00:59:13.600 --> 00:59:18.160] the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [00:59:18.160 --> 00:59:22.360] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [00:59:22.360 --> 00:59:26.200] providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever [00:59:26.200 --> 00:59:28.000] experienced before. [00:59:28.000 --> 00:59:32.120] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for [00:59:32.120 --> 00:59:33.320] the asking. [00:59:33.320 --> 00:59:38.920] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free [00:59:38.920 --> 00:59:43.960] at 1-888-551-0102 or [00:59:43.960 --> 00:59:47.720] by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [00:59:47.720 --> 00:59:50.920] That's freestudybible.com. [00:59:50.920 --> 00:59:56.200] >> You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [00:59:56.200 --> 01:00:00.800] [MUSIC] [01:00:00.800 --> 01:00:04.560] >> The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:00:04.560 --> 01:00:08.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:09.720] Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:09.720 --> 01:00:13.120] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to [01:00:13.120 --> 01:00:16.120] remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:16.120 --> 01:00:18.080] >> Privacy is under attack. [01:00:18.080 --> 01:00:21.680] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:21.680 --> 01:00:26.440] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:26.440 --> 01:00:29.520] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and [01:00:29.520 --> 01:00:31.720] keep your information to yourself. [01:00:31.720 --> 01:00:34.200] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:00:34.200 --> 01:00:37.800] This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com, [01:00:37.800 --> 01:00:41.760] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:00:41.760 --> 01:00:43.840] Start over with startpage. [01:00:43.840 --> 01:00:49.640] >> When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms [01:00:49.640 --> 01:00:52.040] around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug. [01:00:52.040 --> 01:00:55.560] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear [01:00:55.560 --> 01:00:58.080] arms, arms that embrace our freedoms and [01:00:58.080 --> 01:01:00.360] won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [01:01:00.360 --> 01:01:01.000] Get it? [01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:03.720] Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [01:01:03.720 --> 01:01:07.200] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so [01:01:07.200 --> 01:01:11.760] well when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee [01:01:11.760 --> 01:01:15.760] against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now [01:01:15.760 --> 01:01:20.960] appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to always be possible. [01:01:20.960 --> 01:01:22.160] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. [01:01:22.160 --> 01:01:25.040] More news and information at katherinealbrecht.com. [01:01:25.040 --> 01:01:33.320] [MUSIC] [01:01:33.320 --> 01:01:36.160] You may think our brains deteriorate with age, but [01:01:36.160 --> 01:01:40.880] new research shows that as brains get older, they actually work more efficiently. [01:01:40.880 --> 01:01:42.160] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, [01:01:42.160 --> 01:01:47.000] back with new research on how aging makes the mind sharper, after this. [01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:49.120] >> Privacy is under attack. [01:01:49.120 --> 01:01:52.720] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:01:52.720 --> 01:01:57.720] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:01:57.720 --> 01:02:00.800] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and [01:02:00.800 --> 01:02:03.040] keep your information to yourself. [01:02:03.040 --> 01:02:05.440] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:02:05.440 --> 01:02:08.520] >> This message is brought to you by startpage.com, [01:02:08.520 --> 01:02:12.520] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:02:12.520 --> 01:02:14.600] Start over with Startpage. [01:02:14.600 --> 01:02:19.120] >> It's a widely held notion that the older people get, [01:02:19.120 --> 01:02:20.920] the more doddering they become. [01:02:20.920 --> 01:02:23.640] But new research shows that even as our brains age, [01:02:23.640 --> 01:02:26.240] they can actually become more efficient. [01:02:26.240 --> 01:02:30.560] Scientists asked two groups of volunteers, one age 18 to 35, and [01:02:30.560 --> 01:02:35.920] the other 55 to 75, to associate different words with given topics. [01:02:35.920 --> 01:02:39.040] At one point, they told everyone they'd made a mistake. [01:02:39.040 --> 01:02:42.960] When that happened, the younger group's brains lit up and lost focus. [01:02:42.960 --> 01:02:45.600] But the older group's brains didn't even flinch, and [01:02:45.600 --> 01:02:48.360] they stayed focused on solving the next task. [01:02:48.360 --> 01:02:51.640] The moral, there's something to be said for experience. [01:02:51.640 --> 01:02:52.960] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht for [01:02:52.960 --> 01:02:56.240] startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:02:56.240 --> 01:03:06.240] [MUSIC] [01:03:06.240 --> 01:03:16.240] [MUSIC] [01:03:16.240 --> 01:03:26.240] [MUSIC] [01:03:26.240 --> 01:03:41.960] >> All right, folks, we are back. [01:03:41.960 --> 01:03:43.720] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:03:43.720 --> 01:03:49.160] Call in number 512-646-1984. [01:03:49.160 --> 01:03:52.840] And right now, we still have Jane in Texas on the line. [01:03:52.840 --> 01:03:55.000] All right, Jane, please continue. [01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:56.720] >> Did you have any others on the line? [01:03:56.720 --> 01:04:00.040] Cuz I was posted on the telegram, on the call. [01:04:00.040 --> 01:04:01.800] >> At the moment, no. [01:04:01.800 --> 01:04:05.600] >> Okay, well, if I go inside and post it some more, I can't. [01:04:05.600 --> 01:04:08.560] But then it's gonna mess up because I have my radio up so [01:04:08.560 --> 01:04:11.080] I can record what you're saying right now. [01:04:11.080 --> 01:04:16.920] But anyway, do you have a way for me to get a copy of this, like ASAP? [01:04:16.920 --> 01:04:19.880] Cuz I know Debra, it takes her a long time to get them uploaded. [01:04:19.880 --> 01:04:24.760] >> I can't say for sure whether or not we can do that. [01:04:24.760 --> 01:04:26.920] I'll have to ask Debra after the show's done. [01:04:26.920 --> 01:04:31.160] >> Okay, all right, cuz so then if not, [01:04:31.160 --> 01:04:34.560] then can you repeat what we talked about at the beginning? [01:04:34.560 --> 01:04:39.920] I know that chapter four, none of the chapters give the municipal court [01:04:39.920 --> 01:04:45.280] the power to do prosecutions because they don't know how to do a sworn complaint. [01:04:45.280 --> 01:04:50.880] And since they didn't do a sworn complaint, and [01:04:50.880 --> 01:04:56.400] they're gonna say that because of chapter 45, it says in there that they can- [01:04:56.400 --> 01:05:01.480] >> Chapter 45 also says sworn complaint, [01:05:01.480 --> 01:05:05.040] exactly like the Texas Constitution says. [01:05:05.040 --> 01:05:10.600] A sworn complaint can only be sworn if the person has firsthand knowledge. [01:05:10.600 --> 01:05:15.560] This is something that Randy and I are going after them about because they have [01:05:15.560 --> 01:05:17.600] been doing it bass-ackwards forever. [01:05:17.600 --> 01:05:24.360] I have reason to believe and do believe is only valid to file with [01:05:24.360 --> 01:05:28.800] a law enforcement agency to register a complaint that you believe a crime is [01:05:28.800 --> 01:05:33.080] being committed that needs to be investigated. [01:05:33.080 --> 01:05:38.120] That complaint, a verified complaint is enough to initiate an investigation. [01:05:38.120 --> 01:05:44.680] But once it's being prosecuted, it is required in both chapter 15 and [01:05:44.680 --> 01:05:52.080] chapter 45, and in article five, section 12 or 17 of the Texas Constitution, [01:05:52.080 --> 01:05:56.280] that the complaint be sworn, not verified. [01:05:56.280 --> 01:06:01.480] >> Okay, so they're obviously, [01:06:01.480 --> 01:06:08.800] they're thinking that they're allowed to administer oath because it says and- [01:06:08.800 --> 01:06:11.200] >> They think they're allowed to do a lot of things, but [01:06:11.200 --> 01:06:13.800] you keep mixing up the two things. [01:06:13.800 --> 01:06:16.760] They are not the same thing. [01:06:16.760 --> 01:06:21.600] Administering an oath is what they do as a clerk of the court, [01:06:21.600 --> 01:06:23.680] countersigning the complaint. [01:06:25.080 --> 01:06:31.600] The affiant, however, is also a clerk of the court, which they cannot do. [01:06:31.600 --> 01:06:36.840] The clerk is an agent of the judge. [01:06:36.840 --> 01:06:41.920] As an agent of the judge, the judge is now the affiant. [01:06:41.920 --> 01:06:48.800] The judge cannot be both the affiant and the one in charge of the damn case. [01:06:48.800 --> 01:06:50.560] Can't do it. [01:06:50.560 --> 01:06:52.680] >> Right, okay, well, [01:06:52.680 --> 01:06:56.760] the prosecutor is actually the one that's prosecuting it, so but he doesn't know that. [01:06:56.760 --> 01:06:58.280] >> No, stop. [01:06:58.280 --> 01:07:01.000] The judge is the one that's hearing the case. [01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:03.640] His clerk is the one that signed as the affiant. [01:07:03.640 --> 01:07:07.240] >> Okay. >> The judge is the complainant. [01:07:07.240 --> 01:07:11.200] The judge is also the trier of law in fact. [01:07:11.200 --> 01:07:11.700] >> Right. [01:07:11.700 --> 01:07:17.760] So, and it's a conflict of interest of them only. [01:07:17.760 --> 01:07:20.240] >> It denies you an affair in impartial trial. [01:07:20.240 --> 01:07:22.640] It is a conflict of interest. [01:07:22.640 --> 01:07:24.880] It's a whole bunch of things. [01:07:24.880 --> 01:07:29.840] >> Yeah, because they didn't get the magistrate or [01:07:29.840 --> 01:07:31.880] district or county attorney involved. [01:07:31.880 --> 01:07:35.720] So if they- >> No, that's not who didn't get involved. [01:07:35.720 --> 01:07:37.400] That is not the point. [01:07:37.400 --> 01:07:42.320] The point is that the court cannot be the sole initiator of the complaint, [01:07:42.320 --> 01:07:43.440] and they are. [01:07:43.440 --> 01:07:46.840] Every single aspect of the complaint came from the court. [01:07:46.840 --> 01:07:49.040] Every single one. [01:07:49.040 --> 01:07:51.680] >> Yeah, so what I'm saying is, I mean, [01:07:51.680 --> 01:07:54.520] if they would have done it properly, then the officer would have, [01:07:54.520 --> 01:07:59.720] after he investigated, filed or did something with the- [01:07:59.720 --> 01:08:02.880] >> He would be the affiant on the complaint, and he's not. [01:08:02.880 --> 01:08:08.000] >> Okay, okay, so if he was and he actually signed a- [01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:10.840] >> Then they're still past the statute of limitations. [01:08:10.840 --> 01:08:16.920] >> Okay, but still, even if he signed and he was affiant, [01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:23.480] he's still not legal because they didn't file information with the county or [01:08:23.480 --> 01:08:24.480] the district court, right? [01:08:24.480 --> 01:08:28.640] >> They have not complied with Texas law. [01:08:28.640 --> 01:08:29.880] No, they never do. [01:08:29.880 --> 01:08:31.280] I told you that. [01:08:31.280 --> 01:08:34.520] Texas law requires an information. [01:08:34.520 --> 01:08:38.400] Texas law requires a county or district attorney to prosecute. [01:08:38.400 --> 01:08:41.560] In a municipal court, you're not gonna be looking at the district attorney. [01:08:41.560 --> 01:08:43.800] You're gonna be looking at the city attorney, [01:08:43.800 --> 01:08:46.680] who has no authority to prosecute in the name of the state. [01:08:46.680 --> 01:08:50.880] No matter what 45.102 or 201 tries to give him. [01:08:50.880 --> 01:08:53.800] >> Okay. >> Because the power to prosecute in [01:08:53.800 --> 01:08:57.400] the name of the state is a constitutionally delegated power, and [01:08:57.400 --> 01:08:59.600] it cannot be given to a city attorney. [01:08:59.600 --> 01:09:04.280] >> And that was in the Constitution Bill of Rights or [01:09:04.280 --> 01:09:07.320] in the judicial department, judicial powers or what? [01:09:07.320 --> 01:09:12.800] >> Chapter five, or I'm sorry, Article 5 of the Texas Constitution, [01:09:12.800 --> 01:09:14.600] Article or subsection 12. [01:09:15.600 --> 01:09:17.800] >> Okay. >> Okay, and Section 17, [01:09:17.800 --> 01:09:19.480] read both of those. [01:09:19.480 --> 01:09:25.160] It specifically says, who is the prosecutor who serves the state? [01:09:25.160 --> 01:09:26.880] It's the county and district attorney. [01:09:26.880 --> 01:09:31.040] >> Right, and the county would be the justice of the peace. [01:09:31.040 --> 01:09:33.240] >> No, the county attorney. [01:09:33.240 --> 01:09:35.360] >> Okay. [01:09:35.360 --> 01:09:40.400] >> He would be the prosecutor rather than if there is no district attorney. [01:09:40.400 --> 01:09:45.040] And the district attorney would only handle it if it was a felony, [01:09:45.040 --> 01:09:47.320] in which case it wouldn't be a municipal court anyway. [01:09:47.320 --> 01:09:52.880] >> So what about, but it does say, even in the Constitution, [01:09:52.880 --> 01:09:58.200] that it does say that on misdemeanors that if they're, [01:09:58.200 --> 01:10:01.480] okay, was it the Constitution or what? [01:10:01.480 --> 01:10:06.560] It does say, does it not say in lieu of the county or [01:10:06.560 --> 01:10:10.760] district attorney by improbable cause or [01:10:10.760 --> 01:10:17.560] the magistrate, does it not say that on the fine only offense, [01:10:17.560 --> 01:10:22.800] that it can be, it don't have to go through them or not? [01:10:22.800 --> 01:10:25.400] >> It never says it doesn't have to go through him. [01:10:25.400 --> 01:10:27.280] They just simply made it that way. [01:10:27.280 --> 01:10:35.200] >> Okay, because in Chapter 45, I mean, they left that part out. [01:10:35.200 --> 01:10:39.760] >> In 45, they simply say that the prosecutions will be handled by [01:10:39.760 --> 01:10:44.960] the city attorney or in the name of the state by the county attorney. [01:10:44.960 --> 01:10:47.840] It says it right there in 45. [01:10:47.840 --> 01:10:51.760] The city attorney cannot prosecute a case in municipal court in the name of [01:10:51.760 --> 01:10:52.520] the state. [01:10:52.520 --> 01:10:56.440] They can only prosecute it in the name of the city based upon a city ordinance. [01:10:56.440 --> 01:11:01.480] Therefore, there's only a limited number of people they can actually prosecute [01:11:01.480 --> 01:11:04.080] using the city attorney, and you ain't one of them. [01:11:04.080 --> 01:11:09.360] >> Okay, so then they screwed up on the complaint big time because they said it [01:11:09.360 --> 01:11:10.800] was in the name of the state. [01:11:10.800 --> 01:11:12.920] I mean, there's so many things wrong with it. [01:11:12.920 --> 01:11:15.720] >> The complaint has to say the name of the state. [01:11:15.720 --> 01:11:18.760] That's exactly why the city attorney can't freaking do it. [01:11:18.760 --> 01:11:22.260] >> I see. [01:11:22.260 --> 01:11:27.640] So it's not like it has to put that there. [01:11:27.640 --> 01:11:31.240] Okay, I mean, it's so confusing because they aren't doing what they're supposed to [01:11:31.240 --> 01:11:31.840] be doing. [01:11:31.840 --> 01:11:32.840] >> No, they aren't. [01:11:32.840 --> 01:11:36.560] They have written the code of criminal procedure to violate the state [01:11:36.560 --> 01:11:38.720] constitution and itself. [01:11:39.800 --> 01:11:44.440] >> Okay, now that's where I might run into issue because they're gonna say, [01:11:44.440 --> 01:11:47.560] well, it was rewritten so that we could do this. [01:11:47.560 --> 01:11:54.560] >> If it conflicts with the constitution, they cannot do it, and [01:11:54.560 --> 01:11:57.160] that conflicts with the constitution. [01:11:57.160 --> 01:12:01.760] >> Okay. >> Article 1, section 29. [01:12:01.760 --> 01:12:06.760] If anything they do violates any provision of the constitution, [01:12:06.760 --> 01:12:09.080] what they do is null and void. [01:12:09.080 --> 01:12:12.120] >> Where does it say that? [01:12:12.120 --> 01:12:12.840] In Article 1? [01:12:12.840 --> 01:12:15.440] >> Article 1, section 29. [01:12:15.440 --> 01:12:16.880] >> Okay, all right. [01:12:16.880 --> 01:12:19.320] Okay, that's good to know. [01:12:19.320 --> 01:12:25.520] All right, so I'm just gonna go there and I'm probably worried about nothing because [01:12:25.520 --> 01:12:27.040] I know that they've done wrong. [01:12:27.040 --> 01:12:31.440] But unless I pointed out to them, they're not gonna give me a dismissal. [01:12:31.440 --> 01:12:34.760] >> They're never ever going to admit it unless you point it out and [01:12:34.760 --> 01:12:35.960] you stand your ground. [01:12:37.960 --> 01:12:41.680] >> So number one, it's the amount of days that they did not, [01:12:41.680 --> 01:12:46.000] I mean, that it hasn't been brought to, that hadn't prosecuted me or [01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:47.440] taken me to a hearing. [01:12:47.440 --> 01:12:51.400] >> Look, you need to just file the motion that it's outside of [01:12:51.400 --> 01:12:55.520] the statute of limitations and force them to prove it's not. [01:12:55.520 --> 01:12:58.120] >> I did that already, I filed that. [01:12:58.120 --> 01:13:00.120] That was the first thing I filed. [01:13:00.120 --> 01:13:00.620] >> Okay. [01:13:00.620 --> 01:13:04.720] >> Yeah. >> The last one I told you to file- [01:13:04.720 --> 01:13:05.800] >> Was a speedy trial. [01:13:05.800 --> 01:13:11.000] >> Not just a speedy trial, I sent you another one that told you a whole bunch [01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:15.000] of stuff to do and you sent me another email talking about stuff that had [01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:16.320] nothing to do with what I said. [01:13:16.320 --> 01:13:20.040] >> [LAUGH] That must have been like several days ago? [01:13:20.040 --> 01:13:26.800] >> Well, it was at least several days ago, it was before our last class, I think. [01:13:26.800 --> 01:13:28.720] >> Okay, all right. [01:13:28.720 --> 01:13:34.240] Well, I mean, they can't get past the- [01:13:34.240 --> 01:13:38.400] >> They can get past anything you're not prepared to argue. [01:13:38.400 --> 01:13:38.900] >> Okay. [01:13:38.900 --> 01:13:45.960] Well, if I can just get one of the things down well enough, [01:13:45.960 --> 01:13:51.720] then they just can't, they have to be dismissed, right? [01:13:51.720 --> 01:13:56.880] >> Well, any one of these is dismissible as they stand. [01:13:56.880 --> 01:14:00.920] But the fact of the matter is the way they are doing things versus how both [01:14:00.920 --> 01:14:05.120] the state constitution and the code of criminal procedure require them to be done, [01:14:05.120 --> 01:14:07.240] they're not complying with law. [01:14:07.240 --> 01:14:11.720] And by not complying with law, they are denying you in substantive due process. [01:14:11.720 --> 01:14:12.880] They can't do that. [01:14:12.880 --> 01:14:17.360] >> They're gonna, I mean, they're doing it all day long, every day. [01:14:17.360 --> 01:14:21.920] >> I know they're doing it all day long because most people don't know what I've [01:14:21.920 --> 01:14:23.320] told you. [01:14:23.320 --> 01:14:28.520] >> And most people, probably no one has even ever said anything to them about this. [01:14:29.720 --> 01:14:32.880] You would probably be absolutely right. [01:14:32.880 --> 01:14:37.160] Because until I came along, I don't know, I have never found a court case or [01:14:37.160 --> 01:14:40.440] any other document that has the arguments that I've got [01:14:40.440 --> 01:14:45.560] based upon what the law says versus what they do, because they do not match. [01:14:45.560 --> 01:14:52.160] >> Wow, so they're gonna say, who do you think you are trying to tell us how we're [01:14:52.160 --> 01:14:53.520] supposed to be doing? [01:14:53.520 --> 01:14:56.760] >> I'm one of the people you work for, that's who I am. [01:14:58.520 --> 01:15:02.480] I'm one of the people that has a right to due process that you are attempting [01:15:02.480 --> 01:15:07.200] to deny me on and for the record, I object to that. [01:15:07.200 --> 01:15:10.840] >> Good, okay. [01:15:10.840 --> 01:15:13.840] [BLANK_AUDIO] [01:15:13.840 --> 01:15:14.560] Okay. [01:15:14.560 --> 01:15:17.360] [LAUGH] >> Okay. [01:15:17.360 --> 01:15:21.560] >> All right, well, I wish that y'all had had these in the courts a little bit [01:15:21.560 --> 01:15:24.440] already before I start slamming them with all this. [01:15:24.440 --> 01:15:26.040] I mean, who- >> Well, we do, [01:15:26.040 --> 01:15:28.240] that's what the seminar materials got in it. [01:15:28.240 --> 01:15:30.920] Most of those things that you're trying to write motions for [01:15:30.920 --> 01:15:33.480] are already written in the seminar material. [01:15:33.480 --> 01:15:37.120] >> Yeah, I know, but I'm saying I wish you had already gone against some of [01:15:37.120 --> 01:15:40.680] these courts, or have you not? [01:15:40.680 --> 01:15:43.920] >> The people that have the seminar material have used them to go against [01:15:43.920 --> 01:15:45.880] the courts, and they usually get a dismissal so [01:15:45.880 --> 01:15:48.040] the courts don't have to address it. [01:15:48.040 --> 01:15:50.640] That's why the law hasn't been changed. [01:15:50.640 --> 01:15:54.120] They're just dismissing the case rather than let it get to light [01:15:54.120 --> 01:15:56.320] that they've been screwing people over. [01:15:56.320 --> 01:16:00.800] Because once they do that, the floodgates open, and they're gonna get sued. [01:16:00.800 --> 01:16:03.880] >> Right, and that's what I intend to do. [01:16:03.880 --> 01:16:08.440] But what I'm saying, okay, so then if those people who got dismissals without [01:16:08.440 --> 01:16:13.440] having the law changed, and I get mine dismissed, but so [01:16:13.440 --> 01:16:15.200] then nobody's actually gone after and [01:16:15.200 --> 01:16:17.800] will sue them to try to put them in their place then after that, right? [01:16:17.800 --> 01:16:22.960] >> Well, the only thing, the problem is, is you would have to file a suit [01:16:22.960 --> 01:16:25.040] separate from the malicious prosecution. [01:16:25.040 --> 01:16:29.760] You'd have to file a suit for injunctive relief to block them from ever [01:16:29.760 --> 01:16:31.480] prosecuting this case again. [01:16:31.480 --> 01:16:35.280] And then the question is whether you could do it for everyone or just yourself. [01:16:35.280 --> 01:16:39.240] In order to do it for everyone, there'd have to be multiple plaintiffs most likely, [01:16:39.240 --> 01:16:41.600] in which case it would then become a class action suit. [01:16:41.600 --> 01:16:45.800] >> Well, I've already been gathering information about different plaintiffs. [01:16:45.800 --> 01:16:50.440] >> Okay, well, do you think you can handle that from there? [01:16:50.440 --> 01:16:53.040] Cuz I've got another caller up on the board now, I've been expecting. [01:16:53.040 --> 01:16:54.040] >> Yeah, okay, good. [01:16:54.040 --> 01:16:56.600] >> Yeah, I think so, if I'm not, I'll call you back. [01:16:56.600 --> 01:16:58.200] >> Okay, all right, bye-bye. [01:16:58.200 --> 01:16:59.200] >> Bye-bye. [01:16:59.200 --> 01:17:01.120] >> Andrea Hancock. [01:17:01.120 --> 01:17:04.040] >> Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and [01:17:04.040 --> 01:17:06.240] a better understanding of his word? [01:17:06.240 --> 01:17:11.160] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 PM Central Time [01:17:11.160 --> 01:17:15.560] for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord [01:17:15.560 --> 01:17:17.800] with 2 Timothy 2.15. [01:17:17.800 --> 01:17:22.320] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, [01:17:22.320 --> 01:17:24.720] rightly dividing the word of truth. [01:17:24.720 --> 01:17:28.240] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, [01:17:28.240 --> 01:17:32.280] where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [01:17:32.280 --> 01:17:36.400] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound [01:17:36.400 --> 01:17:39.280] doctrine and Christian character development. [01:17:39.280 --> 01:17:43.800] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [01:17:43.800 --> 01:17:45.760] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and [01:17:45.760 --> 01:17:50.360] to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior, Jesus. [01:17:50.360 --> 01:17:54.040] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com, [01:17:54.040 --> 01:17:59.320] Wednesdays from 8 to 10 PM, to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures. [01:17:59.320 --> 01:18:04.480] >> Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or [01:18:04.480 --> 01:18:05.920] even lawsuits? [01:18:05.920 --> 01:18:09.600] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris proven method. [01:18:09.600 --> 01:18:13.520] Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and [01:18:13.520 --> 01:18:15.200] now you can win too. [01:18:15.200 --> 01:18:19.440] You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using [01:18:19.440 --> 01:18:24.120] federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or [01:18:24.120 --> 01:18:28.320] court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors [01:18:28.320 --> 01:18:31.800] out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and [01:18:31.800 --> 01:18:34.360] make them pay you to go away. [01:18:34.360 --> 01:18:39.200] The Michael Mirris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:18:39.200 --> 01:18:41.640] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:18:41.640 --> 01:18:45.120] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and [01:18:45.120 --> 01:18:50.040] click on the blue Michael Mirris banner, or email MichaelMirris@yahoo.com. [01:18:50.040 --> 01:18:53.960] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com, or [01:18:53.960 --> 01:19:00.160] email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S@yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:19:00.160 --> 01:19:10.160] [MUSIC] [01:19:11.600 --> 01:19:21.600] [MUSIC] [01:19:21.600 --> 01:19:26.160] >> All right, folks, we are back. [01:19:26.160 --> 01:19:32.480] This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984 with your host, Eddie Craig. [01:19:32.480 --> 01:19:37.040] I have a new caller up on the board, first time caller, I do believe. [01:19:37.040 --> 01:19:39.960] This would be Andrea in Texas. [01:19:39.960 --> 01:19:41.200] Andrea, what can we do for you? [01:19:41.200 --> 01:19:44.160] >> Hey, Eddie, how are you? [01:19:44.160 --> 01:19:44.920] >> I'm good. [01:19:44.920 --> 01:19:47.520] I tried to respond to your email, and [01:19:47.520 --> 01:19:51.800] your email server at your school bounced it back saying it was blocked. [01:19:51.800 --> 01:19:55.240] So I went ahead and used the phone number you added in the email. [01:19:55.240 --> 01:19:57.600] Fortunately, I could get in touch with you that way to text you and [01:19:57.600 --> 01:19:59.440] say I'm on if you wanna ask. [01:19:59.440 --> 01:20:03.280] >> Yes, thank you so much, and I'll get you a different email so [01:20:03.280 --> 01:20:05.800] we can correspond that way as well. [01:20:05.800 --> 01:20:07.480] >> Okay. >> So my question is, so [01:20:07.480 --> 01:20:09.920] back in January, I had a seating ticket. [01:20:09.920 --> 01:20:15.160] So I filed all the paperwork that Randy had suggested, [01:20:15.160 --> 01:20:20.080] the special appearance, the arresting officer complaint, [01:20:20.080 --> 01:20:24.480] the notice of preservation of rights, the motion of in Lemine, [01:20:24.480 --> 01:20:25.320] I don't know how to say that. [01:20:25.320 --> 01:20:26.000] >> In Lemine. [01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:30.920] >> Lemine, okay, and then challenge to subject matter jurisdiction. [01:20:30.920 --> 01:20:36.000] So I filed all of that plus the affidavit of status and affidavit of facts. [01:20:36.000 --> 01:20:41.400] And when I filed it, it was the day of my court date. [01:20:41.400 --> 01:20:44.440] And when the lady, when I went to the clerk, she looked it up. [01:20:44.440 --> 01:20:47.880] >> Well, hang on a sec, when you say the day of your court date, [01:20:47.880 --> 01:20:49.120] court date to do what? [01:20:49.120 --> 01:20:53.320] >> Well, that was the court date on the ticket, the seating ticket. [01:20:53.320 --> 01:20:53.820] >> Okay. >> I'm sorry, [01:20:53.820 --> 01:20:57.240] I got a seating ticket, and that was the court date of the seating ticket. [01:20:57.240 --> 01:20:58.800] >> That was your initial appearance date? [01:20:58.800 --> 01:21:00.840] >> Correct. [01:21:00.840 --> 01:21:02.160] >> Okay. >> Correct. [01:21:02.160 --> 01:21:05.880] And when she looked it up, she said, you don't have a court date. [01:21:05.880 --> 01:21:07.640] She's like, do you wanna set a court date? [01:21:07.640 --> 01:21:10.680] I said, no, if after looking over the paperwork they wanna set one, [01:21:10.680 --> 01:21:12.280] they can let me know. [01:21:12.280 --> 01:21:15.680] And she said, okay, and she stamped all the paperwork and that was it, and [01:21:15.680 --> 01:21:16.800] I haven't heard anything since. [01:21:16.800 --> 01:21:22.280] >> Okay. >> So what should I do? [01:21:22.280 --> 01:21:24.040] Should I follow up with them? [01:21:24.040 --> 01:21:25.320] Should I just let it go? [01:21:25.320 --> 01:21:25.880] Should I send something? [01:21:25.880 --> 01:21:30.960] >> Well, the thing is, is they are required to notify you if they set [01:21:30.960 --> 01:21:32.160] something up. [01:21:32.160 --> 01:21:36.360] Now, the problem is, is Texas courts are notorious for [01:21:36.360 --> 01:21:39.880] intentionally sending notices to the wrong address. [01:21:39.880 --> 01:21:45.360] They will intentionally go back and look up an old address and [01:21:45.360 --> 01:21:51.080] send everything to that, rather than to the one that you have on the citation or [01:21:51.080 --> 01:21:54.080] whatever you put in your paperwork. [01:21:54.080 --> 01:21:55.200] They're notorious for that. [01:21:55.200 --> 01:21:57.880] They do that on purpose, okay? [01:21:57.880 --> 01:21:58.880] >> Okay. [01:21:58.880 --> 01:22:05.000] >> So first rule of communicating with them, always do it in writing. [01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:09.600] Don't make phone calls, don't do it in person unless you're recording it. [01:22:09.600 --> 01:22:13.280] Always do it in writing, okay? [01:22:13.280 --> 01:22:14.480] >> Okay. [01:22:14.480 --> 01:22:17.920] >> That way you have an actual record of everything. [01:22:17.920 --> 01:22:24.640] Okay, so anything that you do and send in through the mail, [01:22:24.640 --> 01:22:27.560] make sure it's certified mail return receipt requested. [01:22:27.560 --> 01:22:30.080] If you carry it in and hand it to them in person, [01:22:30.080 --> 01:22:34.240] make sure they stamp not only what you give them, but what you keep. [01:22:34.240 --> 01:22:36.560] So that you have a court stamp showing the date and [01:22:36.560 --> 01:22:39.440] time it was filed with them, etc., etc. [01:22:39.440 --> 01:22:41.200] Okay? [01:22:41.200 --> 01:22:42.240] >> Okay. [01:22:42.240 --> 01:22:44.120] >> That way there's always a record. [01:22:44.120 --> 01:22:51.480] >> Right, so at this point, if I was gonna send them something in writing, [01:22:51.480 --> 01:22:52.320] what would that be? [01:22:53.960 --> 01:22:55.760] >> If you're gonna send them something in writing, [01:22:55.760 --> 01:22:58.960] you'd be requesting an update on the case. [01:22:58.960 --> 01:23:02.360] Did they give you a cause number of any kind? [01:23:02.360 --> 01:23:05.000] >> A cause number? [01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:07.520] No, I have a case number, but not a cause number. [01:23:07.520 --> 01:23:10.480] >> Well, that's what a cause number is, is the case number. [01:23:10.480 --> 01:23:12.560] >> Okay, yes, I do have a case number. [01:23:12.560 --> 01:23:18.640] >> Okay, then what you can do is you can check and see. [01:23:18.640 --> 01:23:22.040] Just say, please give me an update on case number blah, blah, blah, [01:23:22.040 --> 01:23:23.960] whatever it is that you've got. [01:23:23.960 --> 01:23:28.640] Please ensure that all communications are in writing and sent to this address. [01:23:28.640 --> 01:23:32.120] And make sure you supply the exact address in that written document that you [01:23:32.120 --> 01:23:32.880] want it sent to. [01:23:32.880 --> 01:23:34.880] Okay? >> Okay. [01:23:34.880 --> 01:23:39.320] >> And make sure you also state that all communications relative to this case [01:23:39.320 --> 01:23:41.320] are to be sent to that same address. [01:23:41.320 --> 01:23:43.180] >> Okay. [01:23:43.180 --> 01:23:46.060] All right. [01:23:48.240 --> 01:23:52.160] All right, so I'll follow up that way and see what happens from there. [01:23:52.160 --> 01:23:57.280] The other one was my son got a speeding ticket a month later, same city, [01:23:57.280 --> 01:23:58.360] same court. [01:23:58.360 --> 01:24:04.120] And he filed an affidavit of status, affidavit of fact, and the special appearance. [01:24:04.120 --> 01:24:10.400] So he went to his hearing, or his court date, and talked to the prosecutor. [01:24:10.400 --> 01:24:13.360] And the prosecutor said, so you're questioning jurisdiction, [01:24:13.360 --> 01:24:14.600] let's set you up a hearing. [01:24:14.600 --> 01:24:17.840] And they set a hearing for April 14th or something like that. [01:24:18.480 --> 01:24:21.840] So did he file all of the motions that I filed as well? [01:24:21.840 --> 01:24:24.200] >> Yeah, he should. [01:24:24.200 --> 01:24:25.820] >> Okay. [01:24:25.820 --> 01:24:33.440] >> But I actually have a speeding motion that I'm giving away for free. [01:24:33.440 --> 01:24:37.760] So if you can get me an email address that I can actually contact you at and [01:24:37.760 --> 01:24:40.360] get it to you, and both of you can use it. [01:24:40.360 --> 01:24:44.480] >> Got it. >> But I have a motion specifically for [01:24:44.480 --> 01:24:46.360] fighting speeding charges in Texas. [01:24:47.760 --> 01:24:52.120] >> Okay, so when you file the motion, this is what I don't understand. [01:24:52.120 --> 01:24:53.560] So we file the motions and everything. [01:24:53.560 --> 01:24:56.880] Do we still go to the court date? [01:24:56.880 --> 01:24:58.520] Do we still show up at the hearings? [01:24:58.520 --> 01:25:02.440] Or do these motions, are they in lieu of- >> If they send you a notice to appear, [01:25:02.440 --> 01:25:06.240] then yes, you go, okay? [01:25:06.240 --> 01:25:09.600] And you make a record that you got there. [01:25:09.600 --> 01:25:14.800] You file something with the clerk of the court, even if it's a written notice. [01:25:14.800 --> 01:25:17.760] I hereby notice the court that I appeared on such and such date and [01:25:17.760 --> 01:25:21.960] such and such time in response to a notice to appear, [01:25:21.960 --> 01:25:27.920] dated this date and time from this court, signed by this individual. [01:25:27.920 --> 01:25:32.960] Always make a record, always, of every interaction you have. [01:25:32.960 --> 01:25:34.440] Because that will help you so [01:25:34.440 --> 01:25:38.160] much later when you go back after them for everything they've done. [01:25:38.160 --> 01:25:43.400] Which hopefully you will do, but- >> Yes, I'm ready. [01:25:43.840 --> 01:25:48.400] >> Okay, so we go to the hearing. [01:25:48.400 --> 01:25:51.960] If you go to the hearing, so is there a chance that if we file these motions, [01:25:51.960 --> 01:25:53.720] they will dismiss it before the hearing? [01:25:53.720 --> 01:25:55.480] Or do they wait to the hearing? [01:25:55.480 --> 01:25:59.680] >> They will try to drag it out to the very last second, [01:25:59.680 --> 01:26:01.880] if they possibly can, to get you to cave. [01:26:01.880 --> 01:26:05.480] To get you to withdraw something or do something or [01:26:05.480 --> 01:26:10.480] say something that will make what you filed irrelevant. [01:26:11.480 --> 01:26:16.720] So rule number one, under no circumstances are either of you to [01:26:16.720 --> 01:26:22.200] discuss one single element of the charge, ever. [01:26:22.200 --> 01:26:29.400] Your argument is and shall focus on nothing but lack of jurisdiction. [01:26:29.400 --> 01:26:37.720] Never mention the charge, never say I wasn't going this fast or that fast. [01:26:37.720 --> 01:26:40.000] Don't say how fast you were going. [01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:42.320] Don't even say you were in a damn car. [01:26:42.320 --> 01:26:45.040] >> [LAUGH] >> Okay? [01:26:45.040 --> 01:26:49.640] >> Right, I remember that- >> Do not address a single element of [01:26:49.640 --> 01:26:50.400] the offense. [01:26:50.400 --> 01:26:54.200] The moment you do, you've thrown personal jurisdiction out the window. [01:26:54.200 --> 01:26:56.960] >> Right, right. [01:26:56.960 --> 01:27:00.080] >> Now it's down to nothing but subject matter jurisdiction, [01:27:00.080 --> 01:27:04.160] which they can easily claim they have after you start talking. [01:27:04.160 --> 01:27:07.920] So don't. [01:27:09.640 --> 01:27:12.680] >> What's the difference with subject matter jurisdiction and [01:27:12.680 --> 01:27:14.480] personal jurisdiction? [01:27:14.480 --> 01:27:19.240] >> Because they have to have jurisdiction over the offense, [01:27:19.240 --> 01:27:21.000] that's subject matter. [01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:24.960] And then they have to have jurisdiction over the person who is alleged to have [01:27:24.960 --> 01:27:27.080] committed that offense, that's personal. [01:27:27.080 --> 01:27:33.680] The other form of jurisdiction they have to have is venue, okay? [01:27:33.680 --> 01:27:36.120] Or territorial is another way of saying it. [01:27:36.120 --> 01:27:41.920] It must have happened in a place as a type of offense, [01:27:41.920 --> 01:27:49.080] a type of an offense, by a person over which they can all claim jurisdiction. [01:27:49.080 --> 01:27:55.080] Now the problem with subject matter jurisdiction here is not simply that [01:27:55.080 --> 01:27:59.640] the court can hear a case based upon the subject matter jurisdiction. [01:27:59.640 --> 01:28:02.240] See, there's another side of jurisdiction here, [01:28:02.240 --> 01:28:05.240] subject matter jurisdiction, that none of these idiots are looking at. [01:28:06.240 --> 01:28:10.240] And that is whether or not the subject matter jurisdiction applied to the person [01:28:10.240 --> 01:28:15.000] they're trying to accuse, just as much as it gives the court jurisdiction to hear. [01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:16.160] Okay? [01:28:16.160 --> 01:28:21.200] If the subject matter does not apply to the accused, [01:28:21.200 --> 01:28:25.840] then they can't get subject matter or personal jurisdiction ever. [01:28:25.840 --> 01:28:28.280] >> Right, okay. [01:28:28.280 --> 01:28:33.240] Now, when I was in the court with him, and she was saying, well, [01:28:33.240 --> 01:28:37.720] this is criminal, and she read the rights basically in a nice type of way, [01:28:37.720 --> 01:28:40.560] trying to schmooze everybody in the court. [01:28:40.560 --> 01:28:43.200] And I'm thinking, well, what crime did I commit? [01:28:43.200 --> 01:28:46.200] There's no victim, right? [01:28:46.200 --> 01:28:51.400] Is the city, Mr. and Mrs. City of Pasadena gonna show up and say I- [01:28:51.400 --> 01:28:52.280] >> No, they're not. [01:28:52.280 --> 01:28:56.360] And while you're right, you have to remember they're not charging you under [01:28:56.360 --> 01:29:00.560] criminal law, they're charging you under regulatory law, which is administrative [01:29:00.560 --> 01:29:04.200] law, which means due process doesn't work the same way. [01:29:04.200 --> 01:29:09.960] What they're doing with regulatory law is absolutely unconstitutional and [01:29:09.960 --> 01:29:11.440] they damn well know it. [01:29:11.440 --> 01:29:15.400] But what they also know is that you don't, and [01:29:15.400 --> 01:29:18.880] that's how they get away with it, okay? [01:29:18.880 --> 01:29:21.360] So while you're correct, there is no victim. [01:29:21.360 --> 01:29:25.960] Because it's a regulatory code and they have established a presumption that you [01:29:25.960 --> 01:29:31.000] are somebody that code regulates, hence you are under the subject matter [01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:36.760] jurisdiction, then they can use it against you, and that's what they do. [01:29:36.760 --> 01:29:41.360] The whole point of my seminar material is to prove that's not the case and [01:29:41.360 --> 01:29:43.000] give you the means to fight back. [01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:46.760] Hang on just a second, let me get this break and [01:29:46.760 --> 01:29:50.360] then we will come back and go on with your discussion, okay? [01:29:50.360 --> 01:29:51.480] >> All right, thank you. [01:29:51.480 --> 01:29:55.760] >> Yep, all right, folks, 512-646-1984, if you wanna call in, [01:29:55.760 --> 01:29:58.840] I can't guarantee I'll get everybody, but I'll certainly try, we'll be right back. [01:29:58.840 --> 01:30:00.600] [MUSIC] [01:30:00.600 --> 01:30:03.760] >> It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, [01:30:03.760 --> 01:30:05.760] social security number, and date of birth. [01:30:05.760 --> 01:30:08.960] But you should think twice before giving away your personal data. [01:30:08.960 --> 01:30:12.440] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll say more in just a moment. [01:30:12.440 --> 01:30:16.240] >> Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and [01:30:16.240 --> 01:30:19.600] creating a massive database of your personal information. [01:30:19.600 --> 01:30:22.440] That's creepy, but it doesn't have to be that way. [01:30:22.440 --> 01:30:25.560] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. [01:30:25.560 --> 01:30:29.840] Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or [01:30:29.840 --> 01:30:32.560] use tracking cookies, and they're third party certified. [01:30:32.560 --> 01:30:36.920] If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. [01:30:36.920 --> 01:30:39.440] Great search results and total privacy. [01:30:39.440 --> 01:30:42.880] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:30:42.880 --> 01:30:45.440] >> Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere. [01:30:45.440 --> 01:30:47.400] But just because a piece of paper asks for [01:30:47.400 --> 01:30:49.560] information doesn't mean you have to give it. [01:30:49.560 --> 01:30:54.640] I leave blank spaces on forms all the time, or I write n/a for not applicable, [01:30:54.640 --> 01:30:56.840] and usually nobody notices or cares. [01:30:56.840 --> 01:31:00.720] I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely [01:31:00.720 --> 01:31:03.760] mandatory for employment or a government requirement. [01:31:03.760 --> 01:31:05.840] And I won't give my phone number to a company or [01:31:05.840 --> 01:31:09.720] an organization unless I actually want them to call me, and that's pretty rare. [01:31:09.720 --> 01:31:11.440] To preserve our vanishing privacy, [01:31:11.440 --> 01:31:14.840] we need to practice saying no to random data requests. [01:31:14.840 --> 01:31:16.520] It's like exercising a muscle. [01:31:16.520 --> 01:31:18.720] It gets easier the more you do it. [01:31:18.720 --> 01:31:20.000] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. [01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:22.840] More news and information at katherinealbrecht.com. [01:31:22.840 --> 01:31:31.600] [MUSIC] [01:31:31.600 --> 01:31:32.440] >> I lost my son. [01:31:32.440 --> 01:31:33.000] >> My nephew. [01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:34.000] >> My uncle. >> My son. [01:31:34.000 --> 01:31:36.040] >> On September 11th, 2001. [01:31:36.040 --> 01:31:39.720] >> Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th. [01:31:39.720 --> 01:31:43.920] >> World Trade Center 7, a 47 story skyscraper was not hit by a plane. [01:31:43.920 --> 01:31:47.720] >> Although the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7. [01:31:47.720 --> 01:31:51.560] >> Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence. [01:31:51.560 --> 01:31:53.520] >> And believe there is more to the story. [01:31:53.520 --> 01:31:55.000] >> Bring justice to my son. [01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:55.560] >> My uncle. [01:31:55.560 --> 01:31:56.120] >> My nephew. [01:31:56.120 --> 01:31:56.640] >> My son. [01:31:56.640 --> 01:31:58.880] >> Go to buildingwhat.org. [01:31:58.880 --> 01:31:59.680] >> Why it fell. [01:31:59.680 --> 01:32:00.520] >> Why it matters. [01:32:00.520 --> 01:32:01.400] >> And what you can do. [01:32:01.400 --> 01:32:03.120] [MUSIC] [01:32:03.120 --> 01:32:06.280] >> Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. [01:32:06.280 --> 01:32:08.600] In today's America, we live in an us against them society. [01:32:08.600 --> 01:32:10.880] And if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [01:32:10.880 --> 01:32:13.800] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:32:13.800 --> 01:32:16.520] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [01:32:16.520 --> 01:32:19.000] the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, [01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:20.760] the right to due process of law. [01:32:20.760 --> 01:32:24.120] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to [01:32:24.120 --> 01:32:26.720] enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [01:32:26.720 --> 01:32:29.720] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [01:32:29.720 --> 01:32:32.680] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help [01:32:32.680 --> 01:32:36.480] you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law. [01:32:36.480 --> 01:32:39.040] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to [01:32:39.040 --> 01:32:41.800] ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [01:32:41.800 --> 01:32:43.800] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, [01:32:43.800 --> 01:32:46.400] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus The Lie. [01:32:46.400 --> 01:32:50.280] Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and [01:32:50.280 --> 01:32:51.840] other useful resource material. [01:32:51.840 --> 01:32:54.200] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from [01:32:54.200 --> 01:32:55.800] ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:55.800 --> 01:32:59.360] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and [01:32:59.360 --> 01:32:59.860] deserve. [01:32:59.860 --> 01:33:04.720] [MUSIC] [01:33:04.720 --> 01:33:11.040] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:11.040 --> 01:33:18.560] [MUSIC] [01:33:18.560 --> 01:33:28.560] [MUSIC] [01:33:28.560 --> 01:33:38.560] [MUSIC] [01:33:40.560 --> 01:33:50.560] [MUSIC] [01:33:50.560 --> 01:34:00.560] [MUSIC] [01:34:00.560 --> 01:34:10.560] [MUSIC] [01:34:10.560 --> 01:34:27.000] >> Folks, we are back. [01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:29.720] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:34:29.720 --> 01:34:32.760] Okay, now back to Andrea here real quick. [01:34:32.760 --> 01:34:36.760] All right, Andrea, I've got the motion here to fight the speeding citation. [01:34:36.760 --> 01:34:43.000] However, even if I email it to you, you do not want to file this [01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:49.080] until they have answered the jurisdictional challenge motion, okay? [01:34:49.080 --> 01:34:49.580] >> Okay. [01:34:49.580 --> 01:34:54.160] >> Because again, this goes straight to merits. [01:34:54.160 --> 01:34:56.520] It blows merits right out of the water for them. [01:34:56.520 --> 01:35:00.280] They couldn't win this if they tried, even on merits. [01:35:00.280 --> 01:35:02.280] >> Okay. [01:35:02.280 --> 01:35:04.560] >> Based upon the information that's in this motion, [01:35:04.560 --> 01:35:08.920] because this information is all about the law they're intentionally misapplying and [01:35:08.920 --> 01:35:12.120] misinterpreting to use to steal money. [01:35:12.120 --> 01:35:15.320] Everything they're doing on a speeding citation is fraud. [01:35:15.320 --> 01:35:18.960] And once you read this motion, you're gonna be spitting nail heads. [01:35:18.960 --> 01:35:26.040] >> Wow, okay, so are they gonna reply to the special [01:35:26.040 --> 01:35:29.880] appearance motion at the hearing or will they do that? [01:35:29.880 --> 01:35:34.760] >> You object, the problem is if you did not file a motion demanding [01:35:34.760 --> 01:35:39.040] a motions hearing prior to trial, that's exactly what they're going to try to do. [01:35:39.040 --> 01:35:44.840] >> Okay, and at the hearing, they're either gonna say, we have jurisdiction. [01:35:44.840 --> 01:35:46.840] And if they do say they have jurisdiction, [01:35:46.840 --> 01:35:48.880] that's when I file the motion that you're gonna email me. [01:35:48.880 --> 01:35:50.780] >> Correct. [01:35:50.780 --> 01:35:53.680] >> Okay, okay. [01:35:53.680 --> 01:35:58.720] >> So I have another, I guess we're just a family of speeders here, [01:35:58.720 --> 01:36:02.520] because my sister got a speeding ticket, but she was doing 23 over and [01:36:02.520 --> 01:36:03.640] then it was written for that. [01:36:03.640 --> 01:36:05.880] >> Doesn't matter, she's doing Mach 12. [01:36:05.880 --> 01:36:08.720] >> Okay, okay. [01:36:08.720 --> 01:36:15.240] >> They could charge her with reckless endangerment or something like that, [01:36:15.240 --> 01:36:18.880] but they could not charge her with speeding because there is no such [01:36:18.880 --> 01:36:20.160] offense in Texas law. [01:36:21.800 --> 01:36:27.400] And even if they did try to charge her with speeding, despite it not existing, [01:36:27.400 --> 01:36:31.640] the other problem is that they cannot prove the elements they're required to prove. [01:36:31.640 --> 01:36:33.280] And they never do. [01:36:33.280 --> 01:36:35.800] They never even assert them in the complaint. [01:36:35.800 --> 01:36:37.840] For instance, have you read your criminal complaint? [01:36:37.840 --> 01:36:42.480] Or do you only have the citation? [01:36:42.480 --> 01:36:46.280] >> I only have the citation. [01:36:46.280 --> 01:36:49.320] >> Okay, they're required to file a criminal complaint. [01:36:49.320 --> 01:36:51.200] Do not let them tell you otherwise. [01:36:52.280 --> 01:36:52.800] >> Okay. >> Okay? [01:36:52.800 --> 01:36:58.680] But when you read the complaint, it will read pretty much exactly the same way [01:36:58.680 --> 01:37:02.960] the citation does because it will lack the following things. [01:37:02.960 --> 01:37:08.120] It will not make any assertion anywhere in either document that you [01:37:08.120 --> 01:37:12.560] failed to control your speed so as to have a collision with another person or [01:37:12.560 --> 01:37:15.480] vehicle already lawfully upon or entering the highway. [01:37:15.480 --> 01:37:16.280] Did that happen? [01:37:16.280 --> 01:37:19.720] >> No. [01:37:19.720 --> 01:37:23.000] >> Then they couldn't prove speeding even if it was an offense because that is [01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:24.080] a mandatory element. [01:37:24.080 --> 01:37:29.120] >> Okay, okay. [01:37:29.120 --> 01:37:34.320] >> Simply going faster than the posted speed limit would not be an offense [01:37:34.320 --> 01:37:36.480] even if there was such an offense. [01:37:36.480 --> 01:37:39.160] Texas law is very clear on that. [01:37:39.160 --> 01:37:43.240] But they simply misinterpreted and [01:37:43.240 --> 01:37:48.160] misapply it to steal money by defrauding people who don't know any better. [01:37:49.280 --> 01:37:50.280] >> Right, right. [01:37:50.280 --> 01:37:52.720] And so- >> Well, [01:37:52.720 --> 01:37:54.280] I'm one of the people that knows better. [01:37:54.280 --> 01:37:59.320] >> Right, yeah, and I'm trying to know better too. [01:37:59.320 --> 01:38:01.720] So I don't want to get taken advantage of or [01:38:01.720 --> 01:38:03.840] have my money stolen any more than anybody else. [01:38:03.840 --> 01:38:09.680] So I'm trying to get this down so that way when and [01:38:09.680 --> 01:38:13.040] if I do have to ever go to court and face these people, I know what to say and [01:38:13.040 --> 01:38:14.120] how to say it. [01:38:14.120 --> 01:38:19.080] And don't say the wrong things and get me into a situation that I can't get out of. [01:38:19.080 --> 01:38:22.240] If you will contact me at the same email address you use, but [01:38:22.240 --> 01:38:26.800] use one that I can reply back to with this document, I will send you this motion. [01:38:26.800 --> 01:38:30.760] And the first thing you need to do, everybody you're talking about needs to do, [01:38:30.760 --> 01:38:34.680] is y'all need to sit down and read and discuss this document together. [01:38:34.680 --> 01:38:37.240] Because the more you discuss it with somebody else that's going through [01:38:37.240 --> 01:38:40.880] the same thing, the more you're going to become in tune with what it says and [01:38:40.880 --> 01:38:43.720] what it means, and you're going to understand it better. [01:38:43.720 --> 01:38:46.680] Then when you go to court and they start trying to argue with you, [01:38:46.680 --> 01:38:50.040] you're already way over their head in what you know. [01:38:50.040 --> 01:38:52.640] Way over their head. [01:38:52.640 --> 01:38:57.480] You read this motion, you will know more than any judge, any prosecutor, and [01:38:57.480 --> 01:39:01.560] any defense attorney in this whole damn state about how to fight a speeding ticket. [01:39:01.560 --> 01:39:06.160] >> Wow, all right, well, I can't wait to get my hands on that then. [01:39:06.160 --> 01:39:10.280] >> And I have proven that more times than I care to count. [01:39:10.280 --> 01:39:16.080] >> Mm-hm, okay, well, this has been wonderful. [01:39:16.080 --> 01:39:18.040] You've answered my questions. [01:39:18.040 --> 01:39:22.160] As of right now, I can't think of any more, but I'm sure they'll come up and [01:39:22.160 --> 01:39:29.720] I'll reach out to you and get this over with so these people can be out of my life. [01:39:29.720 --> 01:39:34.240] >> Okay, well, if you have any more, like I say, give me an email I can reply back to [01:39:34.240 --> 01:39:36.560] and I'll be happy to answer them as best I can. [01:39:36.560 --> 01:39:38.960] I can't promise it'll always be immediate, but [01:39:38.960 --> 01:39:41.720] as soon as I can find it and see the email, I'll answer it. [01:39:41.720 --> 01:39:44.280] >> Yeah, I understand. [01:39:44.280 --> 01:39:48.560] No, I appreciate it because you responded very quickly to the one I sent, so [01:39:48.560 --> 01:39:50.400] I really appreciate that. [01:39:50.400 --> 01:39:54.280] And thank you for texting me and telling me to call in, it's been very helpful. [01:39:54.280 --> 01:39:55.680] >> Okay, well, glad I could help. [01:39:55.680 --> 01:39:58.160] >> All right, thanks, Eddie. [01:39:58.160 --> 01:40:00.200] >> Yes, ma'am, you have a great night. [01:40:00.200 --> 01:40:01.200] >> You too, bye. [01:40:01.200 --> 01:40:01.700] >> Bye-bye. [01:40:01.700 --> 01:40:08.280] All right, now that said, we have another caller up on the board, Ron in Oregon. [01:40:08.280 --> 01:40:11.200] Why do I have a feeling this isn't Ron? [01:40:12.680 --> 01:40:15.160] >> Well, can you hear me? [01:40:15.160 --> 01:40:17.160] >> I can hear you, and it's not Ron, is it? [01:40:17.160 --> 01:40:18.760] >> Well, it's Ron. [01:40:18.760 --> 01:40:21.040] And how did you know that? [01:40:21.040 --> 01:40:25.480] [LAUGH] I'd say because I've been on the board before, I guess. [01:40:25.480 --> 01:40:29.000] >> Not that I can tell. [01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:32.240] >> I've talked to both Randy and Brett in the past. [01:40:32.240 --> 01:40:35.240] And- >> Okay, well, then that may be why you're [01:40:35.240 --> 01:40:36.440] up there. >> I'm following here, [01:40:36.440 --> 01:40:39.000] because it looks like you might have a little space to fill in. [01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:41.280] And I've always got stuff going on here. [01:40:41.280 --> 01:40:45.560] So I wanted to dial in on one little issue that we have going on here. [01:40:45.560 --> 01:40:49.600] We've had some people trying to steal a piece of land of ours for ten years. [01:40:49.600 --> 01:40:52.640] And it's kind of gone into some weird things. [01:40:52.640 --> 01:40:58.920] They actually gave it to their son, this piece of land that our access goes through. [01:40:58.920 --> 01:41:04.480] And they started trying to interlope on our property and everything. [01:41:04.480 --> 01:41:09.360] So as part of this land use thing, I sent off an email detailing [01:41:09.360 --> 01:41:13.040] this old existing road which is on their deed. [01:41:13.040 --> 01:41:16.960] And it's all mapped out and pulled photographs and everything. [01:41:16.960 --> 01:41:20.560] And I've been around here my whole life, and I'm going on 74. [01:41:20.560 --> 01:41:22.400] So I know this stuff really well. [01:41:22.400 --> 01:41:28.160] And so nobody, I was basically showing them that, look, there's another road. [01:41:28.160 --> 01:41:32.440] You don't need to try and take over my road to do what you wanna do here. [01:41:32.440 --> 01:41:37.800] So five months later, and we would actually drive on part of this road [01:41:37.800 --> 01:41:40.520] in the winter and stuff, because it was a little easier. [01:41:40.520 --> 01:41:45.520] And it's mapped, it's on old air photos and everything. [01:41:45.520 --> 01:41:49.720] And by Oregon law, when a road is used for ten years, [01:41:49.720 --> 01:41:53.800] it's automatically a county road, county public road. [01:41:53.800 --> 01:41:54.920] So I wasn't even going for that. [01:41:54.920 --> 01:41:56.760] I was just saying, look, there's this road there. [01:41:56.760 --> 01:41:57.520] Leave me alone. [01:41:57.520 --> 01:41:58.920] Use this other road. [01:41:58.920 --> 01:42:02.080] So nobody ever said, don't use it. [01:42:02.080 --> 01:42:04.200] No, we disagree. [01:42:04.200 --> 01:42:05.240] Anything, they just left us. [01:42:05.240 --> 01:42:07.080] I said, okay, I'll just drive on a little bit here. [01:42:07.080 --> 01:42:11.680] So just to maintain use of it. [01:42:11.680 --> 01:42:16.360] So they set up a camera at some point, and [01:42:16.360 --> 01:42:19.920] the story's a lot more convoluted than this, but this is just this one issue. [01:42:19.920 --> 01:42:24.200] So then they get the sheriff to come in and [01:42:24.200 --> 01:42:30.040] give me a citation for misdemeanor trespass, like five months later. [01:42:30.040 --> 01:42:36.280] And so I look at this thing, and it's like one of those typical uniform citation [01:42:36.280 --> 01:42:38.800] things with all kinds of little words and stuff. [01:42:38.800 --> 01:42:45.120] And this guy cited a date that I supposedly was seen by somebody. [01:42:45.120 --> 01:42:49.600] And they give me this citation that says, must appear in court. [01:42:49.600 --> 01:42:53.760] And it also has a $1,000 fine thing on it. [01:42:53.760 --> 01:42:57.400] And so I've been through a couple of these things, and I went to court, and [01:42:57.400 --> 01:42:58.320] they never show up. [01:42:58.320 --> 01:43:00.840] The DA just declines to prosecute kind of thing. [01:43:00.840 --> 01:43:05.920] So anyway, on this one, I smelled a big fat rat going on, [01:43:05.920 --> 01:43:08.600] because there was obviously a lot of communication and [01:43:08.600 --> 01:43:12.040] correspondence between parties to make this thing happen. [01:43:12.040 --> 01:43:14.160] So I didn't appear, but [01:43:14.160 --> 01:43:18.760] I submitted almost 100 pages of documents of everything to do with this. [01:43:18.760 --> 01:43:22.520] And so then they had a party waiting for [01:43:22.520 --> 01:43:26.040] me at the court to appear for this arraignment deal. [01:43:26.040 --> 01:43:29.960] And they were planning to arrest me and [01:43:29.960 --> 01:43:33.440] everything on the spot in the court had I appeared, which I did not. [01:43:33.440 --> 01:43:38.720] [LAUGH] So now we have a bench warrant, and nobody's doing anything. [01:43:38.720 --> 01:43:45.600] And it's going on ten months later in this limbo, in this thing. [01:43:45.600 --> 01:43:48.760] So I hear your music coming there, so if you want- [01:43:48.760 --> 01:43:49.800] >> Yeah, hang on just a second, [01:43:49.800 --> 01:43:52.640] let me get this break out of the way, and we'll come right back and let you finish. [01:43:52.640 --> 01:43:54.720] >> Okay. >> All right, folks, [01:43:54.720 --> 01:43:56.800] we'll be right back for the last segment of the show. [01:43:56.800 --> 01:43:57.480] Y'all hang on. [01:43:57.480 --> 01:44:00.600] [MUSIC] [01:44:00.600 --> 01:44:04.520] >> Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, [01:44:04.520 --> 01:44:06.560] except in the area of nutrition. [01:44:06.560 --> 01:44:09.640] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and [01:44:09.640 --> 01:44:11.440] it's time we changed all that. [01:44:11.440 --> 01:44:13.760] Our primary defense against aging and [01:44:13.760 --> 01:44:17.760] disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:44:17.760 --> 01:44:22.480] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, [01:44:22.480 --> 01:44:25.800] longevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:44:25.800 --> 01:44:30.200] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products. [01:44:30.200 --> 01:44:31.760] Most of which we reject. [01:44:31.760 --> 01:44:36.640] We have come to trust longevity so much, we became a marketing distributor, [01:44:36.640 --> 01:44:40.160] along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:44:40.160 --> 01:44:43.520] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, [01:44:43.520 --> 01:44:47.760] your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:44:47.760 --> 01:44:52.080] As you realize the benefits of longevity, you may want to join us. [01:44:52.080 --> 01:44:55.480] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, [01:44:55.480 --> 01:44:59.120] help your friends and family, and increase your income. [01:44:59.120 --> 01:45:00.200] Order now. [01:45:00.200 --> 01:45:04.320] >> Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.320 --> 01:45:08.640] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, [01:45:08.640 --> 01:45:15.680] easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [01:45:15.680 --> 01:45:19.360] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.360 --> 01:45:23.200] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.200 --> 01:45:28.080] Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.080 --> 01:45:32.920] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case [01:45:32.920 --> 01:45:34.680] winning experience. [01:45:34.680 --> 01:45:39.120] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:39.120 --> 01:45:43.560] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.560 --> 01:45:48.040] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, [01:45:48.040 --> 01:45:52.360] forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.360 --> 01:45:56.720] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or [01:45:56.720 --> 01:46:00.480] call toll free 866-LAW-EASY. [01:46:00.480 --> 01:46:10.480] [MUSIC] [01:46:24.560 --> 01:46:26.440] >> All right, folks, we are back. [01:46:26.440 --> 01:46:28.000] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:46:28.000 --> 01:46:31.320] I am now in the last segment of tonight's show, and [01:46:31.320 --> 01:46:34.440] I am still talking with Ron in Oregon. [01:46:34.440 --> 01:46:35.880] All right, Ron, please continue. [01:46:35.880 --> 01:46:42.800] >> Okay, so at this point, I guess I'm looking at what advice you might have. [01:46:42.800 --> 01:46:47.160] We've been sitting here, I'm basically been under house arrest for [01:46:47.160 --> 01:46:52.560] ten months, thinking that anytime I go out there, somebody might pounce on me and [01:46:52.560 --> 01:46:56.080] haul me in to do whatever they wanna do for failure to appear and everything. [01:46:56.080 --> 01:47:01.680] But this whole citation thing is basically flawed from the beginning. [01:47:01.680 --> 01:47:06.520] And also through some other court documents, evidence from this other side. [01:47:06.520 --> 01:47:12.920] This email surfaced that clearly shows that this sheriff deputy who [01:47:12.920 --> 01:47:18.400] brought me this citation was engaged in a conspiratorial [01:47:18.400 --> 01:47:24.400] plot to set this thing up and pursue this citation for trespassing. [01:47:24.400 --> 01:47:29.440] Now, the Oregon law on land for there to be trespassed, [01:47:29.440 --> 01:47:33.440] either has to be criminal intent for any kind of a criminal charge. [01:47:33.440 --> 01:47:38.080] But also it has to be posted, no trespassing, there's no posting, [01:47:38.080 --> 01:47:38.720] no anything. [01:47:38.720 --> 01:47:43.600] Plus five months earlier, I had made it clear to them that there was an old road [01:47:44.640 --> 01:47:49.040] there that actually came through this piece of property to our piece of property. [01:47:49.040 --> 01:47:52.720] And thinking that, okay, they'll see this, this is obvious, they know it's there. [01:47:52.720 --> 01:47:56.600] Maybe we can negotiate a little something because I would be willing to vacate [01:47:56.600 --> 01:48:00.800] that road for them to just leave my main road alone. [01:48:00.800 --> 01:48:05.960] Kind of thing, which is a DVD, but I like a whole different topic. [01:48:05.960 --> 01:48:11.560] But so I'm just interested in how best to deal with this warrant thing and [01:48:11.560 --> 01:48:15.000] this totally bogus citation that the more I've learned and [01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:19.400] looked at it, that this sheriff really had no business writing up and [01:48:19.400 --> 01:48:21.040] nobody saw anything. [01:48:21.040 --> 01:48:21.960] He certainly didn't. [01:48:21.960 --> 01:48:25.880] He wrote it up a week after it allegedly occurred. [01:48:25.880 --> 01:48:28.760] He didn't claim anything about seeing anything, but [01:48:28.760 --> 01:48:30.960] he somehow got this into the DA's office. [01:48:30.960 --> 01:48:34.480] And I don't know if a judge might have been involved in it to get to the point [01:48:34.480 --> 01:48:39.720] where he would bring it out and hand it to me and I guess basically call it a summons. [01:48:41.480 --> 01:48:45.160] So that's where I'm at with this particular thing and [01:48:45.160 --> 01:48:47.040] wondering what your thoughts are about that. [01:48:47.040 --> 01:48:49.960] I love the whole jurisdiction thing because I don't think they have either [01:48:49.960 --> 01:48:52.560] subject matter or personal jurisdiction. [01:48:52.560 --> 01:48:54.680] >> Probably, but here's something else. [01:48:54.680 --> 01:48:59.480] In order for him to have come to you, someone would have had to shown him [01:48:59.480 --> 01:49:02.720] something that had information about you on it. [01:49:02.720 --> 01:49:05.840] Let's assume for a second it's that camera you're talking about. [01:49:05.840 --> 01:49:08.680] >> Absolutely, yeah. [01:49:08.680 --> 01:49:12.160] >> So whatever picture was taken was given to the sheriff, [01:49:12.160 --> 01:49:15.960] which the sheriff then used to track you down via the picture it took, [01:49:15.960 --> 01:49:20.080] which I must presume has a license plate picture in it. [01:49:20.080 --> 01:49:23.000] >> You're right, yeah. [01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:24.960] >> Now here's the thing. [01:49:24.960 --> 01:49:27.800] Who verified the source of that picture? [01:49:27.800 --> 01:49:35.320] Where is the investigative documents that says where he got that information from? [01:49:36.680 --> 01:49:42.480] And how can he prove where that picture was actually taken? [01:49:42.480 --> 01:49:45.600] Because there's only two ways that could be done. [01:49:45.600 --> 01:49:49.920] Either someone told him verbally, this is our camera, we took this picture and [01:49:49.920 --> 01:49:54.040] here it is to you, which he has absolutely no way to substantiate, [01:49:54.040 --> 01:49:56.960] absent something signed and sworn by them that it's true. [01:49:56.960 --> 01:50:05.800] Or they actually trespassed on your property to take him to that camera. [01:50:07.680 --> 01:50:12.720] To let him see for himself, this is where the camera that took this picture is, [01:50:12.720 --> 01:50:17.720] which they still don't have a way of actually proving unless they do something [01:50:17.720 --> 01:50:22.800] with the metadata in the picture should the camera have actually saved it. [01:50:22.800 --> 01:50:27.920] That matches that picture back to that camera at that location. [01:50:27.920 --> 01:50:30.280] >> Right. >> See what I'm saying? [01:50:30.280 --> 01:50:33.240] >> And even if they're able to do that, [01:50:33.240 --> 01:50:39.480] all they could do is prove that I was in fact on an old road. [01:50:39.480 --> 01:50:43.240] But- >> No, that's exactly what it would [01:50:43.240 --> 01:50:47.440] prove that you were only on an old road that you had every right to use. [01:50:47.440 --> 01:50:51.760] Because it's a county road and they can't trespass you from a county road. [01:50:51.760 --> 01:50:53.500] >> Right. [01:50:53.500 --> 01:50:58.400] So it's all intimidation, harassment and everything. [01:50:58.400 --> 01:51:02.320] The same sheriff- >> Well, look at it this way. [01:51:02.320 --> 01:51:06.680] They have now done something in your favor, okay? [01:51:06.680 --> 01:51:11.040] Had you actually shown up and had they arrested you, [01:51:11.040 --> 01:51:13.400] you would have had an even bigger payday coming. [01:51:13.400 --> 01:51:17.760] But as of right now, if they pursue this, [01:51:17.760 --> 01:51:20.280] you've got malicious prosecution in the bag. [01:51:20.280 --> 01:51:23.000] >> Yeah. [01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:27.280] >> Okay, if they arrest you, you've also got either false imprisonment or [01:51:27.280 --> 01:51:29.240] false arrest, whatever it is in Oregon. [01:51:30.400 --> 01:51:36.520] If they incarcerate you, then you've got most definitely false imprisonment and [01:51:36.520 --> 01:51:38.600] violations of multiple other rights. [01:51:38.600 --> 01:51:40.760] >> Yeah, yeah. [01:51:40.760 --> 01:51:41.520] >> Okay. [01:51:41.520 --> 01:51:45.880] >> And they've been delivered my version of the Trezevant versus [01:51:45.880 --> 01:51:48.000] city of Tampa fee schedule. [01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:52.120] [LAUGH] >> Well, I hope you updated it for [01:51:52.120 --> 01:51:52.760] inflation. [01:51:52.760 --> 01:51:58.640] Because the last time I checked Trezevant as of 2020, [01:51:58.640 --> 01:52:03.920] the value of Trezevant is 178% higher than it was in 1990, [01:52:03.920 --> 01:52:06.120] whatever it was when they said it. [01:52:06.120 --> 01:52:08.320] >> Yeah. [01:52:08.320 --> 01:52:13.040] >> So that $25,000 for [01:52:13.040 --> 01:52:18.120] 23 minutes is 173% more than that now. [01:52:18.120 --> 01:52:21.720] >> Yeah, so what would be- >> And [01:52:21.720 --> 01:52:24.160] that was before Biden printed all that damn money. [01:52:24.160 --> 01:52:26.480] It's even higher than that now. [01:52:26.480 --> 01:52:27.160] >> Yeah, yeah. [01:52:27.160 --> 01:52:30.040] [LAUGH] >> Could double that. [01:52:30.040 --> 01:52:32.880] So what would my next step be to address this? [01:52:32.880 --> 01:52:39.320] Just point those things out to them, their mistakes and file- [01:52:39.320 --> 01:52:41.160] >> Well, you need to file a motion to [01:52:41.160 --> 01:52:46.560] dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [01:52:46.560 --> 01:52:52.040] And no issue before the court because the evidence countermands [01:52:52.040 --> 01:52:53.680] the allegation on its face. [01:52:53.680 --> 01:52:56.800] >> Yeah, yeah. [01:52:57.880 --> 01:53:00.040] Well, that's exactly what I was looking for, Eddie. [01:53:00.040 --> 01:53:02.000] >> But now here's the problem. [01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:06.360] You were only assuming they used the picture from that camera. [01:53:06.360 --> 01:53:07.240] >> Right. [01:53:07.240 --> 01:53:09.960] >> Okay, because that's all we've got to go on. [01:53:09.960 --> 01:53:13.000] But let's just assume the sheriff, they just told him and [01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:15.680] the sheriff agreed, said, okay, I'll do it. [01:53:15.680 --> 01:53:20.240] That's a whole nother ball of wax that puts them in even worse, deeper water. [01:53:20.240 --> 01:53:22.480] >> Yeah, yep. [01:53:22.480 --> 01:53:27.720] Well, with this email that came out of their attorney on this civil stuff, [01:53:27.720 --> 01:53:32.640] the party complained to the sheriff, actually said in the email, [01:53:32.640 --> 01:53:36.240] did you cite Mrs. Thompson too because she was in the car with him? [01:53:36.240 --> 01:53:42.760] So they had some pretty bad intentions there when they had five months to say, [01:53:42.760 --> 01:53:45.960] hey, that's not really a road, and we don't want you to drive on it or [01:53:45.960 --> 01:53:46.560] anything like that. [01:53:46.560 --> 01:53:50.280] It was like, instead they just set up cameras and laid in wait. [01:53:50.280 --> 01:53:55.040] And but I'm thinking that the people thinking that they were doing [01:53:55.040 --> 01:53:59.120] the trapping may have got trapped themselves. [01:53:59.120 --> 01:54:01.960] >> Yeah, they may not be thinking about that from that perspective. [01:54:01.960 --> 01:54:05.560] But the problem is, is you've got to get your hands on that photo. [01:54:05.560 --> 01:54:10.200] So if the claim is they used that camera to take a photo that they then gave [01:54:10.200 --> 01:54:12.640] to the sheriff to make the complaint, [01:54:12.640 --> 01:54:16.960] then you have a right to that photo through discovery. [01:54:18.320 --> 01:54:22.240] >> Yeah, well, see, we haven't been to court yet because I didn't- [01:54:22.240 --> 01:54:25.360] >> You don't have to go to court to get discovery, file a motion for [01:54:25.360 --> 01:54:28.120] discovery asking for all the evidence relative to the case. [01:54:28.120 --> 01:54:29.840] They're asking you to appear in court for. [01:54:29.840 --> 01:54:33.040] >> Yeah, we've asked for it, but we haven't filed a motion. [01:54:33.040 --> 01:54:34.440] So that would be the thing. [01:54:34.440 --> 01:54:36.600] >> Well, that's what you gotta do. [01:54:36.600 --> 01:54:38.760] You have to file a discovery motion. [01:54:38.760 --> 01:54:43.680] >> Yep, I understand that because we're doing that in the civil stuff. [01:54:43.680 --> 01:54:47.600] >> Yeah. >> So, okay, thank you so much, Eddie. [01:54:47.600 --> 01:54:50.480] Those were the perfect answers and I understand them. [01:54:50.480 --> 01:54:51.880] [LAUGH] >> Okay. [01:54:51.880 --> 01:54:54.120] >> Which I may not have done a year ago. [01:54:54.120 --> 01:54:56.200] >> Well, good luck with it and hang in there. [01:54:56.200 --> 01:54:59.440] >> Okay, thanks a lot, Eddie. [01:54:59.440 --> 01:55:01.320] We love listening to you guys there. [01:55:01.320 --> 01:55:02.360] >> Well, thank you, appreciate it. [01:55:02.360 --> 01:55:04.520] >> Okay. [01:55:04.520 --> 01:55:05.880] >> All right, you have a great night, Ron. [01:55:05.880 --> 01:55:07.720] >> Bye bye. [01:55:07.720 --> 01:55:08.220] >> Bye bye. [01:55:08.220 --> 01:55:15.240] All right, I got just over three minutes and that would be Rader. [01:55:15.240 --> 01:55:17.280] Rader, you got less than three minutes. [01:55:17.280 --> 01:55:21.320] >> All right, Truth Raider here. [01:55:21.320 --> 01:55:25.200] Yeah, the other guy, that's the first caller I've heard calling from Oregon in, [01:55:25.200 --> 01:55:27.200] I have to say, more than five years. [01:55:27.200 --> 01:55:29.160] So that's amazing. [01:55:29.160 --> 01:55:34.560] So anyway, real quick, I'll just roll a couple items and [01:55:34.560 --> 01:55:38.680] then I'll ask you a question since we have to give it the interest of time here. [01:55:38.680 --> 01:55:43.280] There are two people that were doing what I'm doing, except they were doing it [01:55:43.280 --> 01:55:46.760] the wrong way and they were doing it years before I did. [01:55:46.760 --> 01:55:51.320] And I think it was about five or six years ago, this guy was impatient, [01:55:51.320 --> 01:55:53.120] apparently, and he played the game of chicken. [01:55:53.120 --> 01:55:57.280] He went around something, a diesel truck or something, and [01:55:57.280 --> 01:55:58.920] it went head on into another car. [01:55:58.920 --> 01:56:06.440] And it's literally injuring the motorist and killing her guest. [01:56:06.440 --> 01:56:09.320] So he's now in an Oregon State Penitentiary. [01:56:09.320 --> 01:56:12.720] He's not due for release until January 25. [01:56:12.720 --> 01:56:16.680] So what's going on is I think that's my problem. [01:56:16.680 --> 01:56:20.120] And it was around that time, as you remember, years ago. [01:56:20.120 --> 01:56:22.960] >> You think your problem is that somebody else killed somebody? [01:56:22.960 --> 01:56:26.480] >> They did the same thing that I'm doing, so [01:56:26.480 --> 01:56:28.840] they think that I'm more likely to do the same thing. [01:56:28.840 --> 01:56:31.600] >> What are you talking about the same thing that you're doing? [01:56:31.600 --> 01:56:33.520] What are we talking about when you say that? [01:56:33.520 --> 01:56:38.680] >> [LAUGH] I think that I'm gonna be careless and run into somebody. [01:56:39.960 --> 01:56:42.920] And I don't have a license, registration, or insurance. [01:56:42.920 --> 01:56:47.160] >> Is there something that would prevent a person that has all those things from [01:56:47.160 --> 01:56:48.480] doing the same stupid thing? [01:56:48.480 --> 01:56:54.120] >> It's possible, because after that happened, [01:56:54.120 --> 01:56:57.600] they started stopping me all over the place and started pounding my truck and [01:56:57.600 --> 01:56:58.440] all that. [01:56:58.440 --> 01:57:01.400] >> Again, that is not an answer to my question. [01:57:01.400 --> 01:57:08.720] Can someone who has all those things still do the same [01:57:08.720 --> 01:57:12.880] stupid thing the other guy that you're talking about did? [01:57:12.880 --> 01:57:14.240] >> Yeah. [01:57:14.240 --> 01:57:16.600] >> And don't they do it all the time already? [01:57:16.600 --> 01:57:19.160] >> Yeah, yeah, I know that. [01:57:19.160 --> 01:57:23.160] >> Well, then that's not a proper basis to make an argument on for them or you. [01:57:23.160 --> 01:57:26.560] >> Yeah, after that occurred, though, [01:57:26.560 --> 01:57:31.040] I noticed I got stopped all the time after that, after it occurred. [01:57:31.040 --> 01:57:32.760] They let me alone for, as I said, nearly a year, and [01:57:32.760 --> 01:57:34.480] then after that they started stopping me. [01:57:34.480 --> 01:57:40.440] So good news, the last five times in the past year, I've passed by the word, [01:57:40.440 --> 01:57:41.840] they could have stopped me. [01:57:41.840 --> 01:57:45.240] There was one where there was the sheriff's deputy behind me, and [01:57:45.240 --> 01:57:49.040] all five times they refused to bother to stop me. [01:57:49.040 --> 01:57:51.600] They're leaving me alone. [01:57:51.600 --> 01:57:53.720] >> Well, that's what you were hoping for. [01:57:53.720 --> 01:57:55.960] >> Absolutely. [01:57:55.960 --> 01:57:57.440] Anyway, last question. [01:57:57.440 --> 01:58:01.440] If you had to do this all over again, Eddie, would you do this all over again, [01:58:01.440 --> 01:58:03.280] if you can go back 25 years? [01:58:03.280 --> 01:58:07.280] >> If I knew what I knew sooner than I know it now, not only would I have done [01:58:07.280 --> 01:58:11.520] it again, I would have done it a lot harder, a lot faster, and a lot more viciously. [01:58:11.520 --> 01:58:13.360] [MUSIC] [01:58:13.360 --> 01:58:14.520] >> Amen. [01:58:14.520 --> 01:58:17.440] All right, brother, good night, and God bless. [01:58:17.440 --> 01:58:18.240] >> Yes, sir, you too. [01:58:18.240 --> 01:58:18.920] >> Thank you. [01:58:18.920 --> 01:58:20.680] >> All right, wireless caller, I'm sorry, [01:58:20.680 --> 01:58:22.520] I don't have enough time to get to you tonight. [01:58:22.520 --> 01:58:23.400] I apologize. [01:58:23.400 --> 01:58:30.000] If it's important, please send me an email to eddie@ruleoflawradio.com, [01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:32.640] and I will try to get back to you as quickly as I can. [01:58:33.520 --> 01:58:36.000] Area code 775, it looks like. [01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:38.880] All right, folks, thanks for calling, thanks for listening. [01:58:38.880 --> 01:58:42.600] Please keep us in your financial well-being here whenever you can. [01:58:42.600 --> 01:58:47.240] Donate, whether it be to individually or to the network, we need you to survive. [01:58:47.240 --> 01:58:50.360] Y'all take care, have a great week, good night, and God bless. [01:58:50.360 --> 01:58:53.840] >> Bibles for America is offering absolutely free [01:58:53.840 --> 01:58:57.920] a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:57.920 --> 01:59:02.480] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what [01:59:02.480 --> 01:59:08.440] the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.440 --> 01:59:11.720] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.720 --> 01:59:20.720] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.720 --> 01:59:26.200] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:26.200 --> 01:59:30.280] plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.280 --> 01:59:32.960] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.960 --> 01:59:35.920] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, [01:59:35.920 --> 01:59:41.160] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.160 --> 01:59:49.680] That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:49.680 --> 01:59:51.440] [MUSIC] [01:59:51.440 --> 01:59:53.080] >> Looking for some truth? [01:59:53.080 --> 01:59:56.480] You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:59:56.480 --> 01:59:59.720] [MUSIC]