[00:00.000 --> 00:05.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.500 --> 00:09.500]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.500 --> 00:11.000]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:11.000 --> 00:16.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.500 --> 00:18.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.500 --> 00:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:26.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.500 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:34.500]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.500 --> 00:38.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[00:38.000 --> 00:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.000 --> 00:45.500]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:45.500 --> 00:47.500]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.500 --> 00:51.000]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.000 --> 00:54.000]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.000 --> 00:56.500]  Spar with an extra P.
[00:56.500 --> 01:03.000]  S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion.
[01:03.000 --> 01:08.500]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion.
[01:08.500 --> 01:10.500]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.500 --> 01:14.500]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.500 --> 01:17.500]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government,
[01:17.500 --> 01:21.000]  we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:21.000 --> 01:25.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.500 --> 01:37.500]  Pressure. We usually associate it with stress and negativity, but sometimes a bit of pressure can be healing.
[01:37.500 --> 01:42.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you how conditions like nausea can be cured
[01:42.000 --> 01:45.500]  using the traditional Chinese therapy known as acupressure.
[01:45.500 --> 01:47.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:47.500 --> 01:51.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.000 --> 01:56.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.000 --> 02:01.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.000 --> 02:03.500]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[02:03.500 --> 02:07.500]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:07.500 --> 02:11.500]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:11.500 --> 02:14.500]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:14.500 --> 02:21.500]  Acupressure is an ancient practice that uses finger or hand pressure to cure everything from headaches to constipation.
[02:21.500 --> 02:27.500]  The pressure is applied to points known as meridians that are believed to control the flow of energy in the human body.
[02:27.500 --> 02:34.500]  Acupressure offers a simple cure for nausea you might try the next time you get a queasy stomach or a case of motion sickness.
[02:34.500 --> 02:37.500]  Simply apply moderate pressure to the point known as P6.
[02:37.500 --> 02:42.000]  You'll find it on the inside of your wrist, about two fingers' width down from your palm.
[02:42.000 --> 02:48.000]  Placing pressure on the P6 point works on the same principle as those pricey anti-nausea wristbands,
[02:48.000 --> 02:51.500]  but this relief is free and always on hand.
[02:51.500 --> 03:12.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:21.500 --> 03:35.500]  Good evening, folks. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig.
[03:35.500 --> 03:41.500]  It is March 28, 2022. We are live tonight, and I do apologize for my absence.
[03:41.500 --> 03:48.500]  I have been working diligently on the new seminar book just as fast and furious as I possibly can,
[03:48.500 --> 03:53.500]  but still trying to be as complete and accurate and thorough as possible.
[03:53.500 --> 03:57.500]  That said, I don't have a whole lot to go into tonight at the beginning of the show,
[03:57.500 --> 04:04.500]  so if you want to start calling in, the call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[04:04.500 --> 04:09.500]  I was beginning to wonder if I was going to make it around to the show today. I had so much going on.
[04:09.500 --> 04:13.500]  I didn't know if I was going to be able to get back in time to get it done, but here I am.
[04:13.500 --> 04:15.500]  So I'm not prepared, but we are on.
[04:15.500 --> 04:19.500]  So if you want to call in and talk, call that number and let's do that.
[04:19.500 --> 04:28.500]  In the meantime, the book is now up to 240-some-odd pages,
[04:28.500 --> 04:33.500]  some of which you've seen at some point in the past, some of which you most certainly have not,
[04:33.500 --> 04:37.500]  especially not written in this detail in this degree,
[04:37.500 --> 04:43.500]  and most certainly it is not something that our public servants have ever seen before.
[04:43.500 --> 04:50.500]  That said, my hope is to make this book useful to such an extent
[04:50.500 --> 04:55.500]  that you can literally throw it into court as evidence.
[04:55.500 --> 04:59.500]  And all we have to do is make judicial notice of the stuff it contains,
[04:59.500 --> 05:07.500]  because everything it contains is Texas statute, the discussion on it, everything about it.
[05:07.500 --> 05:13.500]  Hopefully, at some point, if I can get this published correctly and actually get it set up that way,
[05:13.500 --> 05:20.500]  then I can actually be called in as an expert witness on this subject because of the book, but we will see.
[05:20.500 --> 05:22.500]  That's what I'm shooting for anyway.
[05:22.500 --> 05:30.500]  Now, we got lots of stuff in the hopper here, most of which is we need money, folks.
[05:30.500 --> 05:35.500]  I hate to say it, but I understand how times are getting for everybody.
[05:35.500 --> 05:39.500]  Believe me, I do, and believe me, I know who is responsible for it.
[05:39.500 --> 05:44.500]  But if at all possible, please remember that we can't do what we do without you guys.
[05:44.500 --> 05:46.500]  None of us are independently wealthy.
[05:46.500 --> 05:51.500]  If you can support us even on a regular basis with a little bit money every month,
[05:51.500 --> 05:56.500]  that goes a long way to getting us to places we couldn't otherwise reach on our own.
[05:56.500 --> 05:59.500]  So please help us as much as you can.
[05:59.500 --> 06:02.500]  Now, that said, I have a couple of callers on the board here.
[06:02.500 --> 06:05.500]  First up appears to be Jane in Texas.
[06:05.500 --> 06:07.500]  Jane, what can we do for you?
[06:07.500 --> 06:08.500]  Oh, my gosh, already?
[06:08.500 --> 06:10.500]  I wasn't ready yet.
[06:10.500 --> 06:11.500]  Hi, Eddie.
[06:11.500 --> 06:12.500]  How are you doing?
[06:12.500 --> 06:13.500]  Good.
[06:13.500 --> 06:14.500]  How are you doing?
[06:14.500 --> 06:15.500]  I'm all right.
[06:15.500 --> 06:21.500]  Expressing a little bit, sitting closer to the date that I'm going to be going forth tomorrow.
[06:21.500 --> 06:31.500]  My main, like I was telling you in class, I get thrown off with different things that I read.
[06:31.500 --> 06:37.500]  And like since I didn't get to go over the Chapter 4 with you all in class,
[06:37.500 --> 06:39.500]  I sent you an email today about Chapter 4.
[06:39.500 --> 06:49.500]  And it seems to me like in Chapter 4 that the Municipal Court gets jurisdiction.
[06:49.500 --> 06:51.500]  Do I need to bring that up?
[06:51.500 --> 06:52.500]  Okay.
[06:52.500 --> 06:57.500]  Get jurisdiction of what and how?
[06:57.500 --> 07:05.500]  Criminal charges and, you know, there are state criminal charges, like penal code.
[07:05.500 --> 07:07.500]  Okay.
[07:07.500 --> 07:17.500]  If the complaint is not valid, which we have determined it is not because it does not comply with law, okay?
[07:17.500 --> 07:21.500]  It does not charge an offense against the laws of this state.
[07:21.500 --> 07:30.500]  It charges an offense against an ordinance, which is not a law of this state, okay?
[07:30.500 --> 07:31.500]  Okay.
[07:31.500 --> 07:36.500]  It's not signed by a credible person as the affiant.
[07:36.500 --> 07:39.500]  It is signed by a clerk of the Municipal Court,
[07:39.500 --> 07:47.500]  which creates an immediate conflict with the court trying the case because their agent is also the accuser.
[07:47.500 --> 07:49.500]  You see the problem?
[07:49.500 --> 07:50.500]  Yes, I do.
[07:50.500 --> 07:54.500]  You were saying in Chapter 45, the application of the Chapter,
[07:54.500 --> 07:58.500]  where it doesn't tell them what to do, then they have to go to the rules.
[07:58.500 --> 08:03.500]  But the other day we were talking about the...
[08:03.500 --> 08:10.500]  If I don't object to the defect or error in a regularity of form of substance in a charge of instrument
[08:10.500 --> 08:15.500]  for the date on which the trial, then I waive or forfeit that right.
[08:15.500 --> 08:18.500]  But right before that, that was an F.
[08:18.500 --> 08:28.500]  But in D and E and 1, 2, 3, 4, after that, it gives those people in Chapter 45,
[08:28.500 --> 08:35.500]  except for the fact that it gives the administrative judge, the clerk and the city secretary
[08:35.500 --> 08:40.500]  and all those people permission to sign the complaint.
[08:40.500 --> 08:44.500]  They cannot sign it as the affiant.
[08:44.500 --> 08:53.500]  They can witness the complaint, but the problem is they are not authorized to do it as an officer,
[08:53.500 --> 08:58.500]  which is what's required, and it's not done under oath with a proper jurat.
[08:58.500 --> 09:01.500]  It's not a sworn complaint.
[09:01.500 --> 09:07.500]  Even Chapter 45 says it must be a sworn complaint.
[09:07.500 --> 09:12.500]  Well, there's no jurat, and there's no one there with personal knowledge.
[09:12.500 --> 09:14.500]  So it cannot be sworn.
[09:14.500 --> 09:16.500]  End of discussion.
[09:16.500 --> 09:18.500]  There's no debate about that.
[09:18.500 --> 09:19.500]  Okay.
[09:19.500 --> 09:20.500]  Okay.
[09:20.500 --> 09:27.500]  So then a proper jurat would be meaning that it has to be by someone who's given the power to...
[09:27.500 --> 09:33.500]  Someone who is doing it under penalty of perjury from firsthand knowledge, and they're not.
[09:33.500 --> 09:34.500]  Okay.
[09:34.500 --> 09:36.500]  All right.
[09:36.500 --> 09:43.500]  So I really can't get...they can't get past that on the hearing, as long as I can present it,
[09:43.500 --> 09:45.500]  as long as I can sit on that.
[09:45.500 --> 09:50.500]  The Texas Constitution and the Kodakona procedure all say it must be sworn.
[09:50.500 --> 09:54.500]  They cannot make it sworn by someone without personal knowledge.
[09:54.500 --> 09:58.500]  The law in Texas will not allow it.
[09:58.500 --> 10:00.500]  Okay.
[10:00.500 --> 10:07.500]  Well, sir, they're just assuming from Texas...I mean, actually they're just doing it...
[10:07.500 --> 10:15.500]  The last email I sent you and told you what to fill out and how to do it is what you need to do.
[10:15.500 --> 10:22.500]  And you are not limited by the time you can do it because it's a subject matter jurisdiction challenge.
[10:22.500 --> 10:29.500]  If there's no proper complaint before the court, they can't just simply say you waived it and let it through.
[10:29.500 --> 10:36.500]  If the complaint is invalid because of lack of jurisdiction and no proper jurisdiction was never sworn,
[10:36.500 --> 10:40.500]  it's invalid, period, and the statute can't make it not so.
[10:40.500 --> 10:41.500]  Okay.
[10:41.500 --> 10:42.500]  Okay.
[10:42.500 --> 10:50.500]  So before...so if I can get it...which one would be first, that one or the statute of limitations?
[10:50.500 --> 10:52.500]  They...
[10:52.500 --> 10:55.500]  It's all the same arguments.
[10:55.500 --> 10:59.500]  They lack jurisdiction because they're past statute of limitations.
[10:59.500 --> 11:04.500]  They lack jurisdiction because there is no properly sworn complaint before the court.
[11:04.500 --> 11:12.500]  They lack jurisdiction because the court cannot be both the complainant and the trier of the fact and the law.
[11:12.500 --> 11:13.500]  They can't do it.
[11:13.500 --> 11:15.500]  It's a conflict of interest.
[11:15.500 --> 11:16.500]  Okay.
[11:16.500 --> 11:17.500]  Yeah, I just needed...I'm sorry.
[11:17.500 --> 11:20.500]  I just needed this tech talk so I could get...make sure I got it straight through.
[11:20.500 --> 11:27.500]  I need to quit looking at other things and just...I'm going to make a sheet of stuff that I just need to stick to the point that...
[11:27.500 --> 11:30.500]  It's not that you need to keep quit looking at other things.
[11:30.500 --> 11:38.500]  The other things you're looking at, you need to understand why they won't save them based upon what I'm telling you.
[11:38.500 --> 11:40.500]  Okay.
[11:40.500 --> 11:46.500]  See, every time you read something new that seems to work, then you say, okay, that takes precedence in your mind.
[11:46.500 --> 11:48.500]  No, it doesn't.
[11:48.500 --> 11:55.500]  If they violated the Constitution and due process, nothing else is going to fix their problem.
[11:55.500 --> 11:56.500]  Okay.
[11:56.500 --> 11:59.500]  Okay.
[11:59.500 --> 12:00.500]  All right.
[12:00.500 --> 12:01.500]  Okay.
[12:01.500 --> 12:02.500]  I'm not going to take up all your time.
[12:02.500 --> 12:05.500]  I know you got a bunch of other people to talk to, so...
[12:05.500 --> 12:08.500]  Well, we can only hope.
[12:08.500 --> 12:09.500]  All right.
[12:09.500 --> 12:11.500]  Well, if I have something else, I won't call back.
[12:11.500 --> 12:12.500]  Okay.
[12:12.500 --> 12:13.500]  Thanks, Eddie.
[12:13.500 --> 12:14.500]  All right.
[12:14.500 --> 12:15.500]  You're welcome.
[12:15.500 --> 12:16.500]  All right.
[12:16.500 --> 12:17.500]  Bye-bye.
[12:17.500 --> 12:18.500]  All right.
[12:18.500 --> 12:22.500]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[12:22.500 --> 12:23.500]  Give us a call, people.
[12:23.500 --> 12:24.500]  Let's talk.
[12:24.500 --> 12:25.500]  We are live tonight.
[12:25.500 --> 12:26.500]  All right.
[12:26.500 --> 12:27.500]  We have John in New York.
[12:27.500 --> 12:30.500]  John, what can we do for you?
[12:30.500 --> 12:38.500]  Well, I've got kind of a convoluted story to tell you, and you're involved with DWI.
[12:38.500 --> 12:46.500]  Two girls were at a house, and I guess there might have been a party, and they had a couple of drinks each.
[12:46.500 --> 12:49.500]  And they got into the car near the house.
[12:49.500 --> 12:57.500]  The house has a camera, an outside camera, and that camera was aimed at the car when they got in.
[12:57.500 --> 13:00.500]  So there's some evidence there who was driving.
[13:00.500 --> 13:14.500]  Later, the car got stopped doing 68 in a 45, and the cop saw the girl get into the...saw the real driver get into the back seat.
[13:14.500 --> 13:21.500]  She jumped into the back seat, and there was the other girl, the passenger, sitting on the passenger side in the front.
[13:21.500 --> 13:32.500]  The cop actually saw the girl, who was the passenger, slide over to the driver's side to open the window to talk to the cop.
[13:32.500 --> 13:45.500]  So we got the real driver jumping in the back seat, and we got the passenger sliding over, and the cop saw her slide over in order to open the window.
[13:45.500 --> 14:04.500]  The girl, six times...the cop kept asking the real girl driver, who was now in the back seat, questions, and the passenger girl, six times, said, you were driving the car, answer the officer.
[14:04.500 --> 14:07.500]  You were driving the car, answer the officer.
[14:07.500 --> 14:15.500]  And the cop himself said three or four times, why did you get out of the driver's seat and get into the back seat?
[14:15.500 --> 14:20.500]  He asked the real driver that question three or four times.
[14:20.500 --> 14:24.500]  Why did you get out of the front seat and get into the back?
[14:24.500 --> 14:39.500]  And the whole time, the cop had the lights shining, the spotlights shining on the inside of the car from behind, so you would think he probably saw any movement in the car as well.
[14:39.500 --> 14:46.500]  But we can't speak for the cop, but I guarantee you he was watching.
[14:46.500 --> 14:48.500]  Let's see.
[14:48.500 --> 14:59.500]  Then the girl said several times at the police station, the passenger girl said the other girl was driving.
[14:59.500 --> 15:01.500]  I was not driving.
[15:01.500 --> 15:04.500]  And she said that several times.
[15:04.500 --> 15:07.500]  The cop ignored her, naturally.
[15:07.500 --> 15:20.500]  And the real driver later was talking to someone who was incarcerated, and you know those two-way phones that they have with the little glass window in between?
[15:20.500 --> 15:23.500]  Well, they record those calls.
[15:23.500 --> 15:38.500]  And the real driver admitted to the sister of the girl who was the passenger, if you could follow that, the bottom line is she admitted that she was the driver and the other girl wasn't.
[15:38.500 --> 15:40.500]  And those calls are recorded.
[15:40.500 --> 15:47.500]  So that's the most convoluted situation I have ever run across in my experience.
[15:47.500 --> 15:49.500]  So there you have it.
[15:49.500 --> 15:52.500]  Any comments?
[15:52.500 --> 15:55.500]  Such as what?
[15:55.500 --> 15:57.500]  What is there to comment on?
[15:57.500 --> 16:01.500]  The sheer stupidity of all this is beyond talking about.
[16:01.500 --> 16:04.500]  The cop saw everything.
[16:04.500 --> 16:16.500]  The girl's going to wind up getting more charges on her for giving false information to a police officer, because he's got her dead to rights if he saw her.
[16:16.500 --> 16:22.500]  Oh, excuse me, excuse me, the passenger got arrested for DWI.
[16:22.500 --> 16:24.500]  I forgot the most important part.
[16:24.500 --> 16:28.500]  The passenger got arrested for DWI.
[16:28.500 --> 16:33.500]  And she blew a 1-8 according to the cop.
[16:33.500 --> 16:36.500]  And in New York State it's.08.
[16:36.500 --> 16:38.500]  Oh, it's.08 everywhere.
[16:38.500 --> 16:43.500]  Hang on just a second, and we'll be right back after this break.
[16:43.500 --> 16:47.500]  All right, folks, call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:47.500 --> 16:49.500]  Give us a call, get in line, let's talk.
[16:49.500 --> 17:00.500]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.500 --> 17:05.500]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word?
[17:05.500 --> 17:16.500]  Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[17:16.500 --> 17:23.500]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
[17:23.500 --> 17:31.500]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[17:31.500 --> 17:38.500]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[17:38.500 --> 17:43.500]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[17:43.500 --> 17:49.500]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[17:49.500 --> 17:59.500]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com, Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[17:59.500 --> 18:05.500]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.500 --> 18:09.500]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:09.500 --> 18:14.500]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win too.
[18:14.500 --> 18:20.500]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:20.500 --> 18:26.500]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:26.500 --> 18:33.500]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.500 --> 18:38.500]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.500 --> 18:41.500]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.500 --> 18:49.500]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.500 --> 19:00.500]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-f at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.500 --> 19:09.500]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:09.500 --> 19:37.500]  All right, folks, we are back.
[19:37.500 --> 19:40.500]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Bungie Night Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[19:40.500 --> 19:47.500]  We are live tonight on February 28, 2022, I'm sorry, March 28, 2022.
[19:47.500 --> 19:53.500]  And just real quick before I get back to John and New York, Janet, if you are still listening,
[19:53.500 --> 20:02.500]  your other email that you sent me asking about why the court's extension of time doesn't count to the against the statute of limitations
[20:02.500 --> 20:11.500]  is because the plaintiff cannot delay the trial in a way that penalizes the defense, okay?
[20:11.500 --> 20:19.500]  The state cannot extend the time with constant delays so as to extend the period of time they have to prosecute you.
[20:19.500 --> 20:21.500]  That's not the way it works.
[20:21.500 --> 20:24.500]  The statute of limitations is there for a reason.
[20:24.500 --> 20:31.500]  You're the only one that can extend it by requesting an extension of time or a continuance or a reset.
[20:31.500 --> 20:34.500]  The state cannot.
[20:34.500 --> 20:36.500]  I hope that helps.
[20:36.500 --> 20:39.500]  All right, back to John in New York.
[20:39.500 --> 20:46.500]  Well, the first problem is they gave her a breathalyzer test and she failed, right?
[20:46.500 --> 20:47.500]  That's correct.
[20:47.500 --> 20:51.500]  Yeah, the real, the passenger driver, the passenger.
[20:51.500 --> 20:52.500]  No, no, no, no.
[20:52.500 --> 20:53.500]  See, that's where you're wrong.
[20:53.500 --> 20:55.500]  You are mistaken.
[20:55.500 --> 21:03.500]  The moment she slid to the driver's side and beneath the wheel with the keys in the car, she was no longer just the passenger.
[21:03.500 --> 21:18.500]  She was the person with potential control of the vehicle and is now subject to a DWI just as much as someone that had been taking it down the road a few minutes before.
[21:18.500 --> 21:21.500]  Yeah, but the cops saw her slide over.
[21:21.500 --> 21:23.500]  Irrelevant, isn't it?
[21:23.500 --> 21:30.500]  She was in a position of control of the car and she was impaired when she took the test, correct?
[21:30.500 --> 21:32.500]  Yeah, but the car was.
[21:32.500 --> 21:43.500]  Had she not taken the test and had no evidence against her as to what the blood alcohol was, this might be a different story.
[21:43.500 --> 21:49.500]  But as it stands with the facts you've given me, there is nothing wrong with what's going on here.
[21:49.500 --> 21:50.500]  Cops saw her do it or not.
[21:50.500 --> 21:51.500]  Irrelevant.
[21:51.500 --> 21:56.500]  Once she got behind the wheel, she is now in potential control of the car.
[21:56.500 --> 22:00.500]  And in most states now, that's all it takes.
[22:00.500 --> 22:02.500]  You've got to be joking.
[22:02.500 --> 22:08.500]  No, I'm not joking.
[22:08.500 --> 22:10.500]  The cop.
[22:10.500 --> 22:17.500]  If the keys had not been in the ignition and the engine had been off, that would be a whole other matter.
[22:17.500 --> 22:20.500]  I think the engine was off.
[22:20.500 --> 22:23.500]  Where were the keys, John?
[22:23.500 --> 22:25.500]  Probably in the ignition.
[22:25.500 --> 22:31.500]  Probably, which means the car could have been started and driven, right?
[22:31.500 --> 22:33.500]  It could have been started and driven, but it wasn't.
[22:33.500 --> 22:36.500]  And with her behind the wheel, right?
[22:36.500 --> 22:37.500]  Yeah, well.
[22:37.500 --> 22:42.500]  That she was in potential control of the car while she was impaired.
[22:42.500 --> 22:48.500]  That's exactly how they're going to see it.
[22:48.500 --> 22:50.500]  That's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard.
[22:50.500 --> 22:52.500]  I'm not saying you're wrong.
[22:52.500 --> 22:57.500]  Well, if you take the statute literally, they couldn't do it that way.
[22:57.500 --> 23:06.500]  But because the statute somewhere has the language, must be liberally construed so as to do such and such,
[23:06.500 --> 23:11.500]  they will extend it that way and they will get away with it.
[23:11.500 --> 23:14.500]  They've been doing it for decades.
[23:14.500 --> 23:19.500]  I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm saying that's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard of.
[23:19.500 --> 23:21.500]  Well, I know I'm not wrong.
[23:21.500 --> 23:24.500]  I absolutely know I'm not wrong.
[23:24.500 --> 23:25.500]  Yeah, no, I agree.
[23:25.500 --> 23:26.500]  I agree.
[23:26.500 --> 23:28.500]  I understand that.
[23:28.500 --> 23:32.500]  But there's something that something really stinks there.
[23:32.500 --> 23:38.500]  Well, like I said, that's the problem with a regulatory code that has the language liberally construed.
[23:38.500 --> 23:49.500]  They liberally construed a regulatory code in a way that violates the rights that they are supposed to be liberally construed in favor of the people.
[23:49.500 --> 23:53.500]  The whole system is set up to be completely bass-ackwards right now.
[23:53.500 --> 23:57.500]  Yeah, but what about jurisprudence?
[23:57.500 --> 24:02.500]  I'm telling you what the jurisprudence is going to say.
[24:02.500 --> 24:03.500]  You're kidding.
[24:03.500 --> 24:04.500]  No.
[24:04.500 --> 24:07.500]  Okay, well, I'll take your word for it.
[24:07.500 --> 24:09.500]  You don't have to take my word for it.
[24:09.500 --> 24:21.500]  You can look up all kinds of DWI cases in virtually every state, and you're going to find one where they've at least one where that's what they've said.
[24:21.500 --> 24:23.500]  Well, that's a new one on me.
[24:23.500 --> 24:27.500]  Okay, but I'm listening.
[24:27.500 --> 24:31.500]  What would you do besides get fried?
[24:31.500 --> 24:33.500]  She should have stayed in the passenger seat.
[24:33.500 --> 24:37.500]  Had she done that, she would have been fine.
[24:37.500 --> 24:39.500]  She should not have taken a breathalyzer.
[24:39.500 --> 24:43.500]  Had she not done that, she would have been fine.
[24:43.500 --> 24:52.500]  In other words, when a cop stops you, you can refuse, obviously, the Fifth Amendment, you can refuse a breathalyzer.
[24:52.500 --> 24:53.500]  Here's the thing.
[24:53.500 --> 24:58.500]  Most states have a statute that says if you refuse, they'll automatically suspend your driver's license.
[24:58.500 --> 25:07.500]  The problem is when they go to trial, for them anyway, is when they go to trial, they don't have any proof of DWI.
[25:07.500 --> 25:08.500]  Okay?
[25:08.500 --> 25:09.500]  There's no breathalyzer.
[25:09.500 --> 25:12.500]  There's no test.
[25:12.500 --> 25:17.500]  There's no pass-fail quotient that depends entirely upon how the cop sees things.
[25:17.500 --> 25:18.500]  Okay?
[25:18.500 --> 25:19.500]  Right.
[25:19.500 --> 25:28.500]  You don't take them. Now, if they can't convict you of DWI, do they have to reinstate your license?
[25:28.500 --> 25:31.500]  So the best thing to do is never take a breathalyzer.
[25:31.500 --> 25:35.500]  You never take the field sobriety test of any kind.
[25:35.500 --> 25:37.500]  Period.
[25:37.500 --> 25:39.500]  You always refuse.
[25:39.500 --> 25:40.500]  You always lawyer up.
[25:40.500 --> 25:43.500]  You do nothing without a lawyer.
[25:43.500 --> 25:46.500]  When are people going to learn this?
[25:46.500 --> 25:51.500]  I know.
[25:51.500 --> 26:08.500]  As you have very aptly put it and very wisely stated many times, when you're dealing with a police officer, you're polite, you're respectful, you shut up, then you shut up some more, and then you keep shutting up.
[26:08.500 --> 26:09.500]  Yep.
[26:09.500 --> 26:14.500]  That's exactly right.
[26:14.500 --> 26:19.500]  That's the best way I've ever heard it phrased, by the way.
[26:19.500 --> 26:25.500]  So I'm going to come away with, she shouldn't have slid over.
[26:25.500 --> 26:28.500]  She should not have taken the breathalyzer.
[26:28.500 --> 26:32.500]  And she never should have engaged the cop in any form of conversation.
[26:32.500 --> 26:39.500]  The first words out of everybody's mouth in that car, I want my lawyer.
[26:39.500 --> 26:41.500]  That's right.
[26:41.500 --> 26:47.500]  The moment they said that, the cop could no longer ask them questions.
[26:47.500 --> 26:55.500]  Well, he, even if he could, then all they got to do is shut up.
[26:55.500 --> 26:58.500]  All they got to do is keep repeating the same mantra.
[26:58.500 --> 26:59.500]  I want my lawyer.
[26:59.500 --> 27:00.500]  Well, man, where were you going?
[27:00.500 --> 27:02.500]  I want my lawyer.
[27:02.500 --> 27:03.500]  Well, where were you coming from?
[27:03.500 --> 27:06.500]  I want my lawyer.
[27:06.500 --> 27:09.500]  Yep.
[27:09.500 --> 27:15.500]  All right, what would you suggest besides get a good lawyer?
[27:15.500 --> 27:17.500]  Well, I can't answer that.
[27:17.500 --> 27:19.500]  I don't know the people you're talking about.
[27:19.500 --> 27:23.500]  I don't know what they're capable of or what they're not capable of.
[27:23.500 --> 27:31.500]  The only reason I tell people to get a lawyer is because I know well enough that they don't know enough to do it themselves.
[27:31.500 --> 27:32.500]  Oh, yeah.
[27:32.500 --> 27:34.500]  Oh, yeah.
[27:34.500 --> 27:35.500]  All right.
[27:35.500 --> 27:43.500]  Considering the fact that they've got messed up this far, the obvious answer is they do not know how to do this for themselves.
[27:43.500 --> 27:46.500]  They're absolutely incapable of doing this for themselves.
[27:46.500 --> 27:48.500]  You're not kidding.
[27:48.500 --> 27:57.500]  Yeah, they don't know the basic things.
[27:57.500 --> 28:00.500]  And that's going to be the problem for most people.
[28:00.500 --> 28:02.500]  They open their mouth when they shouldn't.
[28:02.500 --> 28:03.500]  They say things they shouldn't.
[28:03.500 --> 28:04.500]  They do things they shouldn't.
[28:04.500 --> 28:06.500]  They agree to things they shouldn't.
[28:06.500 --> 28:11.500]  And they never bother to ask for their lawyer.
[28:11.500 --> 28:13.500]  Yep.
[28:13.500 --> 28:14.500]  All right.
[28:14.500 --> 28:19.500]  Any suggestions?
[28:19.500 --> 28:22.500]  Well, tell her to take singing lessons.
[28:22.500 --> 28:28.500]  She's going to need the breath control to blow into that thing to start a car for a while.
[28:28.500 --> 28:34.500]  Okay, I understand.
[28:34.500 --> 28:35.500]  All right.
[28:35.500 --> 28:36.500]  All right.
[28:36.500 --> 28:37.500]  Anything else?
[28:37.500 --> 28:40.500]  No, it looks like she screwed pretty good, doesn't it?
[28:40.500 --> 28:46.500]  Well, it usually works that way when you're the one that did it to yourself.
[28:46.500 --> 28:47.500]  Yep.
[28:47.500 --> 28:58.500]  So I come away with don't slide over, don't take a breathalyzer, and every question I want my lawyer.
[28:58.500 --> 28:59.500]  Yeah.
[28:59.500 --> 29:05.500]  And the girl behind the wheel should have just stayed there and done the exact same thing.
[29:05.500 --> 29:07.500]  Yep.
[29:07.500 --> 29:10.500]  So I knew that they automatically suspend your license.
[29:10.500 --> 29:16.500]  But then if there's no breathalyzer, you go to court and you say, Your Honor, they suspended my license.
[29:16.500 --> 29:21.500]  There's no proof that there was any DWI.
[29:21.500 --> 29:22.500]  I want my license back.
[29:22.500 --> 29:24.500]  That's the way it works, doesn't it?
[29:24.500 --> 29:27.500]  Exactly.
[29:27.500 --> 29:29.500]  Okay.
[29:29.500 --> 29:32.500]  Thank you very kindly.
[29:32.500 --> 29:34.500]  Okay.
[29:34.500 --> 29:36.500]  All right.
[29:36.500 --> 29:43.500]  That said, now, again, folks, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[29:43.500 --> 29:44.500]  We've got another break coming up.
[29:44.500 --> 29:48.500]  I need somebody to talk to because, like I say, I didn't have time to prepare a whole lot for the show tonight,
[29:48.500 --> 29:52.500]  so I would like to have some callers on the board if you're out there and listening.
[29:52.500 --> 30:02.500]  Y'all hang on here, and we will be right back after this upcoming break.
[30:02.500 --> 30:08.500]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under the blood alcohol limit.
[30:08.500 --> 30:15.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalyzers and a government cover-up in a moment.
[30:38.500 --> 30:41.500]  This is an alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.500 --> 30:44.500]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:44.500 --> 30:47.500]  Ever hear the term fine farming?
[30:47.500 --> 30:50.500]  It's when cops fine innocent people to bring in revenue,
[30:50.500 --> 30:54.500]  and it's apparently big business in the Sunshine State of Florida.
[30:54.500 --> 31:00.500]  This case involves breathalyzers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[31:00.500 --> 31:04.500]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated.
[31:04.500 --> 31:08.500]  State officials knew about it for two and a half years, but did nothing.
[31:08.500 --> 31:14.500]  In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document the problem.
[31:14.500 --> 31:19.500]  A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life, but now that the cover-up has been exposed,
[31:19.500 --> 31:22.500]  perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier.
[31:22.500 --> 31:30.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.500 --> 31:36.500]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.500 --> 31:38.500]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.500 --> 31:43.500]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.500 --> 31:46.500]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:46.500 --> 31:48.500]  And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[31:48.500 --> 31:50.500]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.500 --> 31:51.500]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.500 --> 31:52.500]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:52.500 --> 31:53.500]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.500 --> 31:55.500]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.500 --> 31:57.500]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:57.500 --> 32:00.500]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:27.500 --> 32:30.500]  And now, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching
[32:30.500 --> 32:34.500]  tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts
[32:34.500 --> 32:35.500]  to the rule of law.
[32:35.500 --> 32:39.500]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com
[32:39.500 --> 32:40.500]  and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.500 --> 32:44.500]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.500 --> 32:48.500]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.500 --> 32:50.500]  documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.500 --> 32:54.500]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[32:54.500 --> 32:58.500]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:24.500 --> 33:36.500]  All right, folks, we are back.
[33:36.500 --> 33:43.500]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:43.500 --> 33:50.500]  And I have a caller up on the board, but I cannot, for the life of me, see who this would
[33:50.500 --> 33:51.500]  be.
[33:51.500 --> 33:54.500]  Area code 949.
[33:54.500 --> 33:57.500]  Hello?
[33:57.500 --> 33:58.500]  Oh, yes.
[33:58.500 --> 33:59.500]  Hi.
[33:59.500 --> 34:00.500]  This is E.J.
[34:00.500 --> 34:02.500]  I'm calling from a different number, so it's 949.
[34:02.500 --> 34:03.500]  Okay.
[34:03.500 --> 34:04.500]  Okay.
[34:04.500 --> 34:05.500]  Second number.
[34:05.500 --> 34:06.500]  Thank you so much.
[34:06.500 --> 34:12.500]  The first two callers, I learned a lot, especially the last caller with the DWI.
[34:12.500 --> 34:14.500]  I don't know why they call it a DWI.
[34:14.500 --> 34:17.500]  I thought it was a DUI, but I guess...
[34:17.500 --> 34:18.500]  It depends.
[34:18.500 --> 34:20.500]  It varies from state to state.
[34:20.500 --> 34:28.500]  Some say driving while under the influence, and then others say driving under the influence.
[34:28.500 --> 34:30.500]  Another response.
[34:30.500 --> 34:31.500]  Okay.
[34:31.500 --> 34:33.500]  Yeah, I...
[34:33.500 --> 34:36.500]  My call is...
[34:36.500 --> 34:45.500]  Okay, so I filed a summary judgment on the state court case against the hospital.
[34:45.500 --> 34:47.500]  So this is E.J.
[34:47.500 --> 34:53.500]  I had that assault and battery case against me.
[34:53.500 --> 35:00.500]  And now, since that's over, the case was dismissed.
[35:00.500 --> 35:04.500]  I have a lawsuit against the hospital.
[35:04.500 --> 35:08.500]  So I'm still trying to find a security guard, locate him.
[35:08.500 --> 35:12.500]  Yes, ma'am.
[35:12.500 --> 35:17.500]  So he no longer works at the hospital.
[35:17.500 --> 35:20.500]  We've already tried to serve him.
[35:20.500 --> 35:24.500]  The best way is two options.
[35:24.500 --> 35:26.500]  First is request for production.
[35:26.500 --> 35:33.500]  I've already filed my summary judgment because they filed an answer after 30 days.
[35:33.500 --> 35:38.500]  So they're past the 30 days that's filed already.
[35:38.500 --> 35:40.500]  Do you recommend...
[35:40.500 --> 35:43.500]  I do need to go to the library.
[35:43.500 --> 35:44.500]  Probably the vendors.
[35:44.500 --> 35:45.500]  I heard vendors is really good.
[35:45.500 --> 35:46.500]  I'm sorry.
[35:46.500 --> 35:48.500]  It's a lot of things.
[35:48.500 --> 35:49.500]  A lot of questions.
[35:49.500 --> 35:55.500]  First is the request for production or subpoena.
[35:55.500 --> 36:05.500]  If you were in my position, which way would you go, the request for production or subpoena?
[36:05.500 --> 36:07.500]  Because I need at least one identifier.
[36:07.500 --> 36:08.500]  I can't locate him.
[36:08.500 --> 36:19.500]  And I need to locate him before the conference call, the status conference, which is in June.
[36:19.500 --> 36:24.500]  Well, I'm not really sure how you want me to answer that.
[36:24.500 --> 36:31.500]  I remember talking about the lawsuit and all that other stuff.
[36:31.500 --> 36:37.500]  But what are you talking about with the identifier part?
[36:37.500 --> 36:39.500]  I only know his name.
[36:39.500 --> 36:44.500]  Oh, you're talking about for the security guard, not for you.
[36:44.500 --> 36:46.500]  Yes, right.
[36:46.500 --> 36:53.500]  Well, again, did you name his employer in the suit?
[36:53.500 --> 36:55.500]  Yes, definitely.
[36:55.500 --> 36:59.500]  As respond superior for him?
[36:59.500 --> 37:00.500]  Yes, exactly.
[37:00.500 --> 37:10.500]  Okay, then you can demand access to the records of his employment.
[37:10.500 --> 37:15.500]  You do that in discovery.
[37:15.500 --> 37:18.500]  Oh, you just tell me that, yeah.
[37:18.500 --> 37:20.500]  It's not a pre-discovery, right?
[37:20.500 --> 37:24.500]  Because in California, they do have a pre-discovery thing.
[37:24.500 --> 37:27.500]  Well, if you've already filed, then it's not pre.
[37:27.500 --> 37:31.500]  It's ongoing.
[37:31.500 --> 37:37.500]  If you haven't filed, then yeah, it'll be pre-discovery.
[37:37.500 --> 37:39.500]  When you say file, what does that mean?
[37:39.500 --> 37:42.500]  It's a lawsuit.
[37:42.500 --> 37:45.500]  Oh, sorry.
[37:45.500 --> 37:47.500]  I didn't know.
[37:47.500 --> 37:49.500]  Well, yeah, it's not pre-discovery then.
[37:49.500 --> 37:50.500]  It's after.
[37:50.500 --> 37:54.500]  I've already filed the lawsuit.
[37:54.500 --> 37:59.500]  It's kind of strange because the hospital's attorneys,
[37:59.500 --> 38:05.500]  they sent me all these interrogatories, production of documents and so forth,
[38:05.500 --> 38:08.500]  and that was after the lawsuit.
[38:08.500 --> 38:13.500]  And they call it, within their letter, initial discovery.
[38:13.500 --> 38:20.500]  They didn't say pre-discovery, initial discovery.
[38:20.500 --> 38:25.500]  And have you filed initial discovery since you filed the suit?
[38:25.500 --> 38:26.500]  No, I didn't.
[38:26.500 --> 38:32.500]  I should have used that great option, but I did not.
[38:32.500 --> 38:41.500]  Well, if you didn't do any discovery, what are you going to be using as evidence in this case?
[38:41.500 --> 38:46.500]  Well, I mean, as evidence?
[38:46.500 --> 38:53.500]  I mean, the case is dismissed.
[38:53.500 --> 38:58.500]  It was out of sheer malicious prosecution.
[38:58.500 --> 39:02.500]  No, not the case against you, your lawsuit against them.
[39:02.500 --> 39:14.500]  What are you going to be using as evidence against them if you haven't done discovery?
[39:14.500 --> 39:30.500]  Well, I have evidence from public records response from the chief of police and that...
[39:30.500 --> 39:31.500]  How did you get that?
[39:31.500 --> 39:37.500]  The cases through a public request.
[39:37.500 --> 39:42.500]  And you think that's all that you actually need?
[39:42.500 --> 39:46.500]  You better believe there's going to be more.
[39:46.500 --> 39:53.500]  The more you can get your hands on to prove everything you're claiming, the better off you are.
[39:53.500 --> 39:57.500]  Once you got through a public information request,
[39:57.500 --> 40:05.500]  they can prevent you from putting it into the record at trial because you didn't request it through discovery.
[40:05.500 --> 40:09.500]  Therefore, they have no reason to believe it's attached to this case.
[40:09.500 --> 40:20.500]  You would have to get on the stand or you would have to put someone else on the stand to testify as to what you have and where you got it.
[40:20.500 --> 40:22.500]  Okay?
[40:22.500 --> 40:32.500]  So unless you got certified copies of everything, you can't just submit them into the court record and say, here's my evidence.
[40:32.500 --> 40:36.500]  Did you get certified copies of everything?
[40:36.500 --> 40:40.500]  No.
[40:40.500 --> 40:53.500]  Well, certified copies cost money and certified copies are the only records that are self-substantiating for admissibility into the record as evidence.
[40:53.500 --> 40:59.500]  I think subpoena would probably be the best way, I think.
[40:59.500 --> 41:08.500]  Discovery would be your best way to get everything you need.
[41:08.500 --> 41:17.500]  A subpoena you want to use if you're calling a person to court and they have particular records that only they possess that you want them to bring with them,
[41:17.500 --> 41:31.500]  then you can do a subpoena due to stack them. But for the most part, you can't do public information requests and things of that nature for something that is discoverable for the actual lawsuit.
[41:31.500 --> 41:41.500]  If you want to admit it into court, you need to get it through discovery because they have to supply it to you by the order of the court if you get it through discovery.
[41:41.500 --> 41:47.500]  That's what makes it admissible because they're going to certify everything they sent to you.
[41:47.500 --> 41:57.500]  And they're going to file that certification with the court that they responded to your request with all these records.
[41:57.500 --> 41:59.500]  Okay.
[41:59.500 --> 42:09.500]  The only other thing you can use is certified copies of whatever records you're going to bring yourself.
[42:09.500 --> 42:13.500]  And then that only works if they're public records.
[42:13.500 --> 42:17.500]  Public records?
[42:17.500 --> 42:26.500]  Yeah, like the police reports and thing and the court record from the previous prosecution and all that that was dismissed.
[42:26.500 --> 42:30.500]  I see. Okay.
[42:30.500 --> 42:36.500]  I mean, I did a public records request but it wasn't certified.
[42:36.500 --> 42:44.500]  Well, the records request isn't what's certified. What you get back is what you request as certified.
[42:44.500 --> 42:56.500]  When you send in the public records request, you say, I hereby request certified copies of the following documents or records.
[42:56.500 --> 43:01.500]  And if you don't do that, they don't come back certified.
[43:01.500 --> 43:08.500]  Wow. Wow. Okay. So I have to do a second one to the new sheet.
[43:08.500 --> 43:16.500]  Well, as I said, do discovery. Then you don't have to pay for certified copies.
[43:16.500 --> 43:21.500]  Oh, I see. Okay.
[43:21.500 --> 43:32.500]  I know you did tell me I think a month ago during our live show broadcast. So I need to be listened to that one.
[43:32.500 --> 43:38.500]  And okay. Thank you so much.
[43:38.500 --> 43:39.500]  You're welcome.
[43:39.500 --> 43:40.500]  That's all I needed.
[43:40.500 --> 43:41.500]  Okay.
[43:41.500 --> 43:49.500]  All right. Bye-bye.
[43:49.500 --> 44:01.500]  Bye-bye, folks. We're about to take a break. Y'all hang on. 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[44:01.500 --> 44:04.500]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.500 --> 44:15.500]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:15.500 --> 44:22.500]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.500 --> 44:27.500]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.500 --> 44:34.500]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.500 --> 44:43.500]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.500 --> 44:52.500]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.500 --> 45:01.500]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.500 --> 45:06.500]  I love Logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[45:06.500 --> 45:11.500]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without Logos.
[45:11.500 --> 45:14.500]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[45:14.500 --> 45:21.500]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[45:21.500 --> 45:23.500]  How can I help Logos?
[45:23.500 --> 45:30.500]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[45:30.500 --> 45:35.500]  First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[45:35.500 --> 45:38.500]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[45:38.500 --> 45:44.500]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and Logos gets a few pesos.
[45:44.500 --> 45:45.500]  Do I pay extra?
[45:45.500 --> 45:46.500]  No.
[45:46.500 --> 45:48.500]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[45:48.500 --> 45:49.500]  No.
[45:49.500 --> 45:50.500]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[45:50.500 --> 45:52.500]  No. I mean, yes.
[45:52.500 --> 45:58.500]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[45:58.500 --> 45:59.500]  You're welcome.
[45:59.500 --> 46:09.500]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[46:29.500 --> 46:39.500]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[46:59.500 --> 47:15.500]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the call-in number 512-646-1984.
[47:15.500 --> 47:17.500]  You want to call and ask a question?
[47:17.500 --> 47:26.500]  Oh, I got to tell you, folks, while I'm trying to get this book done and all the other stuff, I've got them on plate at the moment, this has been very, very hectic.
[47:26.500 --> 47:30.500]  I do apologize for my absence from the show.
[47:30.500 --> 47:37.500]  It's just so hard to get all that stuff juggled around and ready to go and actually sleep at the same time.
[47:37.500 --> 47:40.500]  So I do apologize.
[47:40.500 --> 47:48.500]  But let me say that the folks that have been kept on donating through thick and thin, even when I wasn't here to do the show, I appreciate you guys so much.
[47:48.500 --> 47:49.500]  Thank you all.
[47:49.500 --> 47:53.500]  There's no way we could survive at this without you guys.
[47:53.500 --> 47:59.500]  It's just so much going on and so much to do and just us to do it.
[47:59.500 --> 48:01.500]  I do all this work by myself.
[48:01.500 --> 48:03.500]  There's nobody here to help me.
[48:03.500 --> 48:13.500]  I don't have too many people to bounce it off of because everybody's got their own lives and schedules, and very few people have delved into this subject to the depth that I have.
[48:13.500 --> 48:24.500]  And the few that have are so busy with the other stuff they're working on, they don't have time to sit down and review mine to see whether or not it's clear enough for the layman to understand it.
[48:24.500 --> 48:30.500]  So given that, it takes a lot out of me, and sometimes I am just not up for sitting here.
[48:30.500 --> 48:38.500]  I've got something going on with my knee right now that makes sitting down for any length of time an extremely painful experience.
[48:38.500 --> 48:43.500]  And even though I'm feeling it now, I knew I had to do a show tonight because I've been going off this thing too long.
[48:43.500 --> 48:47.500]  But I still need some people to talk to, all right?
[48:47.500 --> 48:51.500]  I wish I had been able to prepare material for it tonight, but I didn't.
[48:51.500 --> 48:53.500]  I just did not have the time.
[48:53.500 --> 49:00.500]  So if you're out there and you're listening and you have a question, a comment, or whatever, please feel free to call in and talk to us.
[49:00.500 --> 49:11.500]  Now, I've got some young lady that has sent me an email about speeding tickets that her and her son have both gotten in Pasadena, Texas.
[49:11.500 --> 49:20.500]  But I can't respond to her email because everything that goes to her work email address is getting blocked and rejected.
[49:20.500 --> 49:29.500]  So fortunately, she attached her phone number to this thing, so I had to send her a text message while we were on break to ask her if she wanted to get some answers to her questions.
[49:29.500 --> 49:32.500]  Now would be a good time by calling into the show here.
[49:32.500 --> 49:38.500]  Now, guys, one thing about the new seminar book, okay?
[49:38.500 --> 49:43.500]  It is going to be much larger than the other book, okay?
[49:43.500 --> 49:48.500]  The other book, I can't remember exactly how many pages it was, and I know it went into a lot of stuff.
[49:48.500 --> 49:50.500]  It didn't really need to.
[49:50.500 --> 49:55.500]  The new one is going into everything in very great depth and detail.
[49:55.500 --> 50:07.500]  It is linking together all of the pieces that you need to know about, but most people don't understand how to look up and locate and find and associate.
[50:07.500 --> 50:11.500]  So I am going in and doing all of that for you.
[50:11.500 --> 50:16.500]  Just the discussion on person is 20-something pages long, okay?
[50:16.500 --> 50:27.500]  But there are a ton of statutes in the transportation code and in the other codes in general that define the term person various ways for various reasons.
[50:27.500 --> 50:34.500]  And so to help people better understand how that term works, it took a lot to explain it.
[50:34.500 --> 50:38.500]  I am hoping I did not make it overly complicated.
[50:38.500 --> 50:42.500]  I have sent it to a couple of people that I know don't have a lot of experience with this to read.
[50:42.500 --> 50:45.500]  They said they could read and understand it just fine.
[50:45.500 --> 50:51.500]  But when I go back and look at it, I am just worried that that is not going to be the case.
[50:51.500 --> 50:52.500]  I don't know why.
[50:52.500 --> 50:56.500]  I should trust that they know what they are talking about, that they understood it and they followed it.
[50:56.500 --> 51:04.500]  But I am just trying to find some way to make this stuff more, less verbose, but still make the same point.
[51:04.500 --> 51:10.500]  And when it comes to legal dissection and discussion, that is not an easy task.
[51:10.500 --> 51:18.500]  You would be surprised how easy it is in a legal discussion that if you break a statement up
[51:18.500 --> 51:24.500]  or you accentuate it verbally or written in the wrong place with a comma or a semicolon,
[51:24.500 --> 51:33.500]  it completely changes the meaning of what you are saying and what the intent of what you are saying actually was.
[51:33.500 --> 51:41.500]  So I have to be extremely careful not to break it someplace where it is going to break the logic and break the point.
[51:41.500 --> 51:43.500]  And I am hoping I have done that.
[51:43.500 --> 51:49.500]  So I have got a couple of other people that actually do know how to read this stuff
[51:49.500 --> 51:52.500]  and might have time at some point to look at it.
[51:52.500 --> 51:59.500]  But it has been slow going for me because having people to do that review work for me is very, very hard to come by.
[51:59.500 --> 52:03.500]  That said, I seem to have Jane back up on the board again.
[52:03.500 --> 52:07.500]  So let's see what is going on there. Jane, you are back.
[52:07.500 --> 52:12.500]  Hi, Eddie. Okay. Since nobody is calling yet, I am going to take advantage.
[52:12.500 --> 52:17.500]  Okay. I was wondering where specifically does it say?
[52:17.500 --> 52:21.500]  I know I had it in my notes somewhere, but I have got so many notes and stuff.
[52:21.500 --> 52:28.500]  It is 180 days for them. They would have to prosecute it despite.
[52:28.500 --> 52:31.500]  It is not 100. Okay. It is a court.
[52:31.500 --> 52:36.500]  It is several court opinions on the subject of Speedy Trial. Okay.
[52:36.500 --> 52:39.500]  I do not know where you got 180 days from.
[52:39.500 --> 52:44.500]  They have two years to prosecute a misdemeanor. Okay.
[52:44.500 --> 52:50.500]  But that two years is a ticking clock unless one of a couple of things happens.
[52:50.500 --> 52:54.500]  A warrant is issued and no arrest is ever made on the warrant.
[52:54.500 --> 52:59.500]  That tolls the statute of limitations. You file a continuance.
[52:59.500 --> 53:05.500]  That tolls the statute of limitations for whatever period the continuance is granted.
[53:05.500 --> 53:14.500]  Or if you do a reset, exact same thing, for whatever period the time of the reset was for.
[53:14.500 --> 53:18.500]  Let's see. Well, actually, that is the only two.
[53:18.500 --> 53:24.500]  That is the only two. Between that and the continuance.
[53:24.500 --> 53:31.500]  Yeah, but when the other side, the plaintiff, the state requests a continuance or a reset,
[53:31.500 --> 53:38.500]  they cannot count that time against you nor take it away from the statute of limitations.
[53:38.500 --> 53:45.500]  Now, the problem with the Speedy Trial, once they have filed the complaint,
[53:45.500 --> 53:51.500]  which is courts have already said, you can't say your Speedy Trial was violated in three months.
[53:51.500 --> 53:56.500]  That's too soon. But at five months, that's longer than you need.
[53:56.500 --> 54:03.500]  So the sweet spot, according to the courts, is right around four months, which would be approximately 120 days.
[54:03.500 --> 54:09.500]  If they file the complaint and then fail to prosecute within 120 days,
[54:09.500 --> 54:12.500]  then they denied you and your right to a Speedy Trial.
[54:12.500 --> 54:20.500]  However, the issue there is, is that you had to raise the issue of Speedy Trial for that to work.
[54:20.500 --> 54:23.500]  Now, here's the other side of that coin.
[54:23.500 --> 54:29.500]  The statute of limitations is still two years long, okay?
[54:29.500 --> 54:34.500]  So they have to do everything within that two year period.
[54:34.500 --> 54:40.500]  File the complaint, get the indictment, do the prosecution, and that's that.
[54:40.500 --> 54:43.500]  They get it within the two years, fine.
[54:43.500 --> 54:47.500]  The problem here is they didn't do that.
[54:47.500 --> 54:56.500]  They're way past two years on prosecuting the case, despite having filed the complaint.
[54:56.500 --> 54:57.500]  You follow?
[54:57.500 --> 54:58.500]  Okay.
[54:58.500 --> 55:04.500]  But they did, my attorney did have two motions for continuance, and I know I have to...
[55:04.500 --> 55:07.500]  Do you have anything that said they were granted?
[55:07.500 --> 55:12.500]  Do you have any order that states a period of time they were granted for?
[55:12.500 --> 55:13.500]  Yes.
[55:13.500 --> 55:14.500]  Okay.
[55:14.500 --> 55:17.500]  How many days total was that?
[55:17.500 --> 55:20.500]  Well, okay, that depends because here's the thing.
[55:20.500 --> 55:25.500]  Do you count the days that are...the time that he sent in the motion and then the time they were granted,
[55:25.500 --> 55:30.500]  which are sometimes two or three days, are those days counted?
[55:30.500 --> 55:41.500]  The motion is considered filed the day that it's postmarked or the day it's stamped by the court, okay?
[55:41.500 --> 55:43.500]  Okay.
[55:43.500 --> 55:44.500]  So...
[55:44.500 --> 55:46.500]  If they...
[55:46.500 --> 55:49.500]  I haven't finished answering your question yet.
[55:49.500 --> 55:50.500]  Hang on just a second.
[55:50.500 --> 55:51.500]  Okay.
[55:51.500 --> 55:52.500]  I'm sorry, sorry, sorry.
[55:52.500 --> 56:01.500]  So from the day they received it to the day they ruled on it does not count, okay?
[56:01.500 --> 56:02.500]  Okay.
[56:02.500 --> 56:11.500]  However, if they ruled that it's not granted, it does count.
[56:11.500 --> 56:15.500]  Okay, so does not count meaning that it's excluded.
[56:15.500 --> 56:17.500]  Correct.
[56:17.500 --> 56:26.500]  If they grant the continuance, then the maximum they can grant it for is 45 days according to Texas law.
[56:26.500 --> 56:31.500]  So what was the period of time he requested for the continuance?
[56:31.500 --> 56:32.500]  It was longer than that.
[56:32.500 --> 56:34.500]  I mean, well, here's the issue.
[56:34.500 --> 56:38.500]  He only filed two motions and there was four of them done.
[56:38.500 --> 56:43.500]  So two of them were done by the court.
[56:43.500 --> 56:48.500]  Because there was a motion that he filed and then the next just says email.
[56:48.500 --> 56:53.500]  And then there's another motion that he filed and the next one says court report.
[56:53.500 --> 56:59.500]  The one where they filed court report had 257 days from the last day that...
[56:59.500 --> 57:06.500]  I mean, from the day that we were supposed to go to a hearing, all of a sudden everything just disappears.
[57:06.500 --> 57:14.500]  And then the court realized it on December 30th, 2021, like oops, oh yeah, we forgot.
[57:14.500 --> 57:18.500]  We've got to set this out to court date.
[57:18.500 --> 57:29.500]  And by that point, 257 days had gone by from the time that I was supposed to appear at a hearing that there was no notes about, no nothing about.
[57:29.500 --> 57:36.500]  I do not believe the municipal court has the power to do a 245-day continuance.
[57:36.500 --> 57:37.500]  No, I don't either.
[57:37.500 --> 57:38.500]  I don't either.
[57:38.500 --> 57:40.500]  257 days, actually.
[57:40.500 --> 57:41.500]  Well, whatever.
[57:41.500 --> 57:46.500]  They don't have 200 days, much less, you know, more than that.
[57:46.500 --> 57:50.500]  They're going to use that as an excuse as a pandemic and stuff.
[57:50.500 --> 57:52.500]  They can use all the excuses they want.
[57:52.500 --> 57:54.500]  It doesn't stop the statute of limitations.
[57:54.500 --> 57:57.500]  It doesn't stop due process.
[57:57.500 --> 58:03.500]  It's not disaster or, you know, some other kind of ruling that they would have had, temporary ruling.
[58:03.500 --> 58:08.500]  There was nothing in law that allowed them to stop holding court.
[58:08.500 --> 58:09.500]  Nothing.
[58:09.500 --> 58:11.500]  Okay.
[58:11.500 --> 58:12.500]  Okay.
[58:12.500 --> 58:18.500]  They don't get to just turn off the justice system and make the people being punished by it wait.
[58:18.500 --> 58:20.500]  They don't get to do that.
[58:20.500 --> 58:21.500]  Okay.
[58:21.500 --> 58:24.500]  All right.
[58:24.500 --> 58:27.500]  So that's the big thing right there.
[58:27.500 --> 58:28.500]  Okay.
[58:28.500 --> 58:29.500]  Well, hang on.
[58:29.500 --> 58:31.500]  I got another break coming up and then I'll pick you up, all right?
[58:31.500 --> 58:32.500]  Okay.
[58:32.500 --> 58:33.500]  All right.
[58:33.500 --> 58:34.500]  Hang on.
[58:34.500 --> 58:35.500]  All right, folks.
[58:35.500 --> 58:38.500]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:38.500 --> 58:39.500]  Give us a call.
[58:39.500 --> 58:40.500]  Get in line.
[58:40.500 --> 58:50.500]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.500 --> 58:53.500]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[58:53.500 --> 58:57.500]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.500 --> 59:01.500]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:01.500 --> 59:05.500]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:05.500 --> 59:08.500]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.500 --> 59:12.500]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:12.500 --> 59:17.500]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.500 --> 59:21.500]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:21.500 --> 59:24.500]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word
[59:24.500 --> 59:27.500]  beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.500 --> 59:31.500]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version
[59:31.500 --> 59:33.500]  simply for the asking.
[59:33.500 --> 59:36.500]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours
[59:36.500 --> 59:43.500]  just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.500 --> 59:47.500]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.500 --> 59:50.500]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.500 --> 59:53.500]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[59:53.500 --> 01:00:00.500]  logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.500 --> 01:00:04.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:04.500 --> 01:00:07.500]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:07.500 --> 01:00:09.500]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:09.500 --> 01:00:10.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[01:00:10.500 --> 01:00:12.500]  and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:00:12.500 --> 01:00:15.500]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:15.500 --> 01:00:17.500]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:17.500 --> 01:00:21.500]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:21.500 --> 01:00:23.500]  And once your privacy is gone,
[01:00:23.500 --> 01:00:26.500]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:00:26.500 --> 01:00:29.500]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance,
[01:00:29.500 --> 01:00:31.500]  and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:31.500 --> 01:00:34.500]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:34.500 --> 01:00:37.500]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:00:37.500 --> 01:00:41.500]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:41.500 --> 01:00:45.500]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:45.500 --> 01:00:47.500]  When I think of the Second Amendment,
[01:00:47.500 --> 01:00:50.500]  I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill of Rights
[01:00:50.500 --> 01:00:52.500]  and a big old bear hug.
[01:00:52.500 --> 01:00:56.500]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms,
[01:00:56.500 --> 01:01:00.500]  arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[01:01:00.500 --> 01:01:01.500]  Get it?
[01:01:01.500 --> 01:01:03.500]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[01:01:03.500 --> 01:01:07.500]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[01:01:07.500 --> 01:01:08.500]  when he said,
[01:01:08.500 --> 01:01:13.500]  The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[01:01:13.500 --> 01:01:17.500]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America,
[01:01:17.500 --> 01:01:20.500]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[01:01:20.500 --> 01:01:22.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:22.500 --> 01:01:25.500]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:33.500 --> 01:01:35.500]  You may think our brains deteriorate with age,
[01:01:35.500 --> 01:01:38.500]  but new research shows that as brains get older,
[01:01:38.500 --> 01:01:40.500]  they actually work more efficiently.
[01:01:40.500 --> 01:01:46.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with new research on how aging makes the mind sharper after this.
[01:02:10.500 --> 01:02:16.500]  It's a widely held notion that the older people get, the more doddering they become,
[01:02:16.500 --> 01:02:21.500]  but new research shows that even as our brains age, they can actually become more efficient.
[01:02:21.500 --> 01:02:28.500]  Scientists asked two groups of volunteers, one aged 18 to 35 and the other 55 to 75,
[01:02:28.500 --> 01:02:31.500]  to associate different words with given topics.
[01:02:31.500 --> 01:02:34.500]  At one point, they told everyone they'd made a mistake.
[01:02:34.500 --> 01:02:37.500]  When that happened, the younger group of people who were older than them
[01:02:37.500 --> 01:02:40.500]  knew when they'd made a mistake.
[01:02:40.500 --> 01:02:43.500]  When that happened, the younger group's brains lit up and lost focus,
[01:02:43.500 --> 01:02:48.500]  but the older group's brains didn't even flinch and they stayed focused on solving the next task.
[01:02:48.500 --> 01:02:51.500]  The moral? There's something to be said for experience.
[01:02:51.500 --> 01:03:10.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for storedpeach.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:21.500 --> 01:03:49.500]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:49.500 --> 01:03:52.500]  And right now, we still have Jane in Texas on the line.
[01:03:52.500 --> 01:03:54.500]  Alright, Jane, please continue.
[01:03:54.500 --> 01:03:59.500]  Did you have any others on the line? Because I was supposed to be on the telegram.
[01:03:59.500 --> 01:04:01.500]  At the moment, no.
[01:04:01.500 --> 01:04:05.500]  Okay. Well, if I go inside and post it some more, I can't,
[01:04:05.500 --> 01:04:10.500]  but then it's going to mess up because I have my radio up so I can record what you're saying right now.
[01:04:10.500 --> 01:04:16.500]  But anyway, do you have a way for me to get a copy of this, you know, like ASAP for,
[01:04:16.500 --> 01:04:20.500]  because I know Debra, it takes her a long time to get them on uploaders.
[01:04:20.500 --> 01:04:27.500]  I can't say for sure whether or not we can do that. I'll have to ask Debra after the show's done.
[01:04:27.500 --> 01:04:34.500]  Okay. Alright. So then if not, then can you repeat what we talked about at the beginning?
[01:04:34.500 --> 01:04:41.500]  I know that Chapter 4, none of the chapters give the municipal court the power to do prosecutions
[01:04:41.500 --> 01:04:46.500]  because they don't know how to do a sworn complaint.
[01:04:46.500 --> 01:04:52.500]  And since they didn't do a sworn complaint, and they're going to say that because of Chapter 45,
[01:04:52.500 --> 01:04:57.500]  it says in there that they can...
[01:04:57.500 --> 01:05:04.500]  Chapter 45 also says sworn complaint, exactly like the Texas Constitution says.
[01:05:04.500 --> 01:05:11.500]  A sworn complaint can only be sworn if the person has firsthand knowledge.
[01:05:11.500 --> 01:05:18.500]  This is something that Randy and I are going after them about because they have been doing it bass-ackwards forever.
[01:05:18.500 --> 01:05:25.500]  I have reason to believe and do believe is only valid to file with a law enforcement agency
[01:05:25.500 --> 01:05:32.500]  to register a complaint that you believe a crime is being committed that needs to be investigated.
[01:05:32.500 --> 01:05:38.500]  That complaint, a verified complaint, is enough to initiate an investigation.
[01:05:38.500 --> 01:05:46.500]  But once it's being prosecuted, it is required in both Chapter 15 and Chapter 45,
[01:05:46.500 --> 01:05:57.500]  and in Article 5, Section 12 or 17 of the Texas Constitution, that the complaint be sworn, not verified.
[01:05:57.500 --> 01:06:08.500]  Okay. So they're obviously, they're thinking that they're allowed to administer oath because it says...
[01:06:08.500 --> 01:06:13.500]  They think they're allowed to do a lot of things, but you keep mixing up the two things.
[01:06:13.500 --> 01:06:16.500]  They are not the same thing.
[01:06:16.500 --> 01:06:24.500]  Administering an oath is what they do as a clerk of the court, counter-signing the complaint.
[01:06:24.500 --> 01:06:32.500]  The affiant, however, is also a clerk of the court, which they cannot do.
[01:06:32.500 --> 01:06:41.500]  The clerk is an agent of the judge. As an agent of the judge, the judge is now the affiant.
[01:06:41.500 --> 01:06:50.500]  The judge cannot be both the affiant and the one in charge of the damn case. Can't do it.
[01:06:50.500 --> 01:06:55.500]  Right. Okay. Well, the prosecutor is actually one that's prosecuting it, so...
[01:06:55.500 --> 01:07:00.500]  Missing? No, stop. The judge is the one that's hearing the case.
[01:07:00.500 --> 01:07:04.500]  His clerk is the one that's signed as the affiant.
[01:07:04.500 --> 01:07:05.500]  Okay.
[01:07:05.500 --> 01:07:10.500]  The judge is the complainant. The judge is also the trier of law, in fact.
[01:07:10.500 --> 01:07:17.500]  Right. So the conflict of interest is for them only to have...
[01:07:17.500 --> 01:07:24.500]  It denies you in a fair and impartial trial. It is a conflict of interest. It's a whole bunch of things.
[01:07:24.500 --> 01:07:32.500]  Yeah, because they didn't invoke... I mean, they didn't get the magistrate or district or county attorney involved, so...
[01:07:32.500 --> 01:07:37.500]  No, that's not who didn't get involved. That is not the point.
[01:07:37.500 --> 01:07:43.500]  The point is that the court cannot be the sole initiator of the complaint, and they are.
[01:07:43.500 --> 01:07:48.500]  Every single aspect of the complaint came from the court. Every single one.
[01:07:48.500 --> 01:07:59.500]  Yeah. So what I'm saying is, I mean, if they would have done it properly, then the officer would have, after he investigated, filed or did something with the...
[01:07:59.500 --> 01:08:02.500]  He would be the affiant on the complaint, and he's not.
[01:08:02.500 --> 01:08:07.500]  Okay. Okay. So if he was and he actually signed...
[01:08:07.500 --> 01:08:11.500]  Then they're still past the statute of limitations.
[01:08:11.500 --> 01:08:25.500]  Okay. But still, even if he signed and he was affiant, he's still not legal because they didn't file information with their county or the district court, right?
[01:08:25.500 --> 01:08:31.500]  They have not complied with Texas law. No, they never do. I told you that.
[01:08:31.500 --> 01:08:38.500]  Texas law requires an information. Texas law requires a county or district attorney to prosecute.
[01:08:38.500 --> 01:08:41.500]  In a municipal court, you're not going to be looking at the district attorney.
[01:08:41.500 --> 01:08:51.500]  You're going to be looking at the city attorney who has no authority to prosecute in the name of the state, no matter what 45.102 or 201 tries to give him.
[01:08:51.500 --> 01:09:00.500]  Okay. Because the power to prosecute in the name of the state is a constitutionally delegated power, and it cannot be given to a city attorney.
[01:09:00.500 --> 01:09:08.500]  And that was in the chapter... That was in the Constitutional Bill of Rights or in the judicial department and judicial powers or what?
[01:09:08.500 --> 01:09:15.500]  Chapter 5. I'm sorry, Article 5 of the Texas Constitution, article or subsection 12.
[01:09:15.500 --> 01:09:19.500]  Okay. Okay. And section 17. Read both of those.
[01:09:19.500 --> 01:09:27.500]  It specifically says who is the prosecutor who serves the state. It's the county and district attorney.
[01:09:27.500 --> 01:09:30.500]  Right. And the county would be the justice of the peace.
[01:09:30.500 --> 01:09:33.500]  No, the county attorney.
[01:09:33.500 --> 01:09:34.500]  Okay.
[01:09:34.500 --> 01:09:41.500]  He would be the prosecutor rather than if there is no district attorney.
[01:09:41.500 --> 01:09:48.500]  And the district attorney would only handle it if it was a felony, in which case it wouldn't be a municipal court anyway.
[01:09:48.500 --> 01:09:58.500]  So what about... But it does say, even in the Constitution, it does say that on misdemeanors that if they're...
[01:09:58.500 --> 01:10:01.500]  Okay. Was it the Constitution or what?
[01:10:01.500 --> 01:10:19.500]  It does say... Does it not say in lieu of, you know, the county or district attorney by improbable cause or the magistrate doesn't not say that on the fine only offense that it can be...
[01:10:19.500 --> 01:10:22.500]  It doesn't have to go through him or not?
[01:10:22.500 --> 01:10:29.500]  It never says it doesn't have to go through him. They just simply made it that way.
[01:10:29.500 --> 01:10:35.500]  Okay. Because in Chapter 45, that's what... I mean, they left that part out.
[01:10:35.500 --> 01:10:44.500]  In 45, they simply say that the prosecutions will be handled by the city attorney or in the name of the state by the county attorney.
[01:10:44.500 --> 01:10:52.500]  It says it right there in 45. The city attorney cannot prosecute a case in municipal court in the name of the state.
[01:10:52.500 --> 01:10:57.500]  They can only prosecute it in the name of the city based upon a city ordinance.
[01:10:57.500 --> 01:11:05.500]  Therefore, there's only a limited number of people they can actually prosecute using the city attorney, and you ain't one of them.
[01:11:05.500 --> 01:11:10.500]  Okay. So then they screwed up on the complaint big time because they stood in the name of the state.
[01:11:10.500 --> 01:11:12.500]  I mean, there's so many things wrong with it.
[01:11:12.500 --> 01:11:20.500]  The complaint has to say the name of the state. That's exactly why the city attorney can't freaking do it.
[01:11:20.500 --> 01:11:31.500]  Oh, I see. So it's not like it has to put that there. Okay. I mean, it's so confusing because they aren't doing what they're supposed to be doing.
[01:11:31.500 --> 01:11:41.500]  No, they aren't. They have written the Code of Criminal Procedure to violate the state constitution and itself.
[01:11:41.500 --> 01:11:49.500]  Okay. Now, that's where I'm not running to issue because they're going to say, well, it was rewritten so that we could do this.
[01:11:49.500 --> 01:11:57.500]  If it conflicts with the Constitution, they cannot do it, and that conflicts with the Constitution.
[01:11:57.500 --> 01:11:58.500]  Okay.
[01:11:58.500 --> 01:12:10.500]  Article 1, Section 29, if anything they do violates any provision of the Constitution, what they do is null and void.
[01:12:10.500 --> 01:12:12.500]  Where does it say that in Article 1?
[01:12:12.500 --> 01:12:15.500]  Article 1, Section 29.
[01:12:15.500 --> 01:12:20.500]  Okay. All right. Okay. That's good to know.
[01:12:20.500 --> 01:12:31.500]  All right. So I'm just going to go there, and I'm probably worried about nothing because they know that they've done wrong, but unless I pointed out to them, they're not going to give me a dismissal.
[01:12:31.500 --> 01:12:38.500]  They're never, ever going to admit it unless you point it out and you stand your ground.
[01:12:38.500 --> 01:12:48.500]  So, number one, it's the amount of days that they did not, I mean, that it hasn't been brought to, that they didn't prosecute me or take me to a hearing.
[01:12:48.500 --> 01:12:56.500]  Look, you need to just file the motion that it's outside of the statute of limitations and force them to prove it's not.
[01:12:56.500 --> 01:13:00.500]  I did that already. I filed that. That was the first thing I filed.
[01:13:00.500 --> 01:13:01.500]  Okay.
[01:13:01.500 --> 01:13:02.500]  Yeah.
[01:13:02.500 --> 01:13:04.500]  The last one I told you to file.
[01:13:04.500 --> 01:13:06.500]  Was a speedy trial.
[01:13:06.500 --> 01:13:08.500]  Not just a speedy trial.
[01:13:08.500 --> 01:13:17.500]  I sent you another one that told you a whole bunch of stuff to do, and you sent me another email talking about stuff that had nothing to do with what I said.
[01:13:17.500 --> 01:13:21.500]  It must have been like several days ago?
[01:13:21.500 --> 01:13:26.500]  Well, it was at least several days ago. It was before our last class, I think.
[01:13:26.500 --> 01:13:34.500]  Okay. All right. Well, I mean, they can't get past. They can't get past the stuff.
[01:13:34.500 --> 01:13:37.500]  They can get past anything you're not prepared to argue.
[01:13:37.500 --> 01:13:40.500]  Oh, okay.
[01:13:40.500 --> 01:13:51.500]  Well, if I can just get one of the things down well enough, then they just can't, they have to be dismissed.
[01:13:51.500 --> 01:13:53.500]  Right?
[01:13:53.500 --> 01:13:56.500]  Well, any one of these is dismissable as they stand.
[01:13:56.500 --> 01:14:06.500]  But the fact of the matter is the way they are doing things versus how both the state constitution and the Code of Criminal Procedure require them to be done, they're not complying with law.
[01:14:06.500 --> 01:14:13.500]  And by not complying with law, they are denying you a substantive due process. They can't do that.
[01:14:13.500 --> 01:14:17.500]  They're going to, I mean, they're doing it all day long every day.
[01:14:17.500 --> 01:14:22.500]  I know they're doing it all day long because most people don't know what I've told you.
[01:14:22.500 --> 01:14:29.500]  And most people, probably no one has even ever said anything to them about this.
[01:14:29.500 --> 01:14:32.500]  You would probably be absolutely right.
[01:14:32.500 --> 01:14:46.500]  Because until I came along, I don't know, I have never found a court case or any other document that has the arguments that I've got based upon what the law says versus what they do because they do not match.
[01:14:46.500 --> 01:14:53.500]  Wow. So they're going to say, who do you think you are trying to tell us how we're supposed to be doing?
[01:14:53.500 --> 01:14:58.500]  I'm one of the people you work for. That's who I am.
[01:14:58.500 --> 01:15:05.500]  I'm one of the people that has a right to due process that you are attempting to deny me on and for the record.
[01:15:05.500 --> 01:15:08.500]  I object to that.
[01:15:08.500 --> 01:15:10.500]  Good.
[01:15:10.500 --> 01:15:13.500]  Okay.
[01:15:13.500 --> 01:15:17.500]  Okay.
[01:15:17.500 --> 01:15:24.500]  All right. Well, I wish I wish that y'all had had these in these courts a little bit already before I start slamming them with all this.
[01:15:24.500 --> 01:15:25.500]  I mean, who?
[01:15:25.500 --> 01:15:28.500]  Well, we do. That's what the seminar materials got in it.
[01:15:28.500 --> 01:15:33.500]  Most of those things that you're trying to write motions for are already written in the seminar material.
[01:15:33.500 --> 01:15:40.500]  Yeah, I know. But I'm saying I wish you had had already gone against some of these courts or have you not?
[01:15:40.500 --> 01:15:47.500]  The people that have the seminar material have used them to go against the courts and they usually get a dismissal so the courts don't have to address it.
[01:15:47.500 --> 01:15:50.500]  That's why the law hasn't been changed.
[01:15:50.500 --> 01:16:01.500]  They're just dismissing the case rather than let it get to light that they've been screwing people over because once they do that, the floodgates open and they're going to get sued.
[01:16:01.500 --> 01:16:03.500]  Right. And that's what I intend to do.
[01:16:03.500 --> 01:16:12.500]  Well, what I'm saying, okay, so then if those people who got dismissals without having the law changed and I get mine dismissed,
[01:16:12.500 --> 01:16:18.500]  so then nobody's actually gone after and will sue them to try to put them in their place then after that, right?
[01:16:18.500 --> 01:16:24.500]  Well, the only thing, the problem is, is you would have to file a suit separate from the malicious prosecution.
[01:16:24.500 --> 01:16:31.500]  You'd have to file a suit for injunctive relief to block them from ever prosecuting this case again.
[01:16:31.500 --> 01:16:35.500]  And then the question is whether you could do it for everyone or just yourself.
[01:16:35.500 --> 01:16:42.500]  In order to do it for everyone, there'd have to be multiple plaintiffs most likely, in which case it would then become a class action suit.
[01:16:42.500 --> 01:16:47.500]  Well, I've already been gathering information about different plaintiffs.
[01:16:47.500 --> 01:16:50.500]  Okay. Well, do you think you can handle that from there?
[01:16:50.500 --> 01:16:53.500]  Because I've got another caller up on the board now I've been expecting.
[01:16:53.500 --> 01:16:56.500]  Okay, good. Yeah, I think so. If not, I'll call you back.
[01:16:56.500 --> 01:16:58.500]  Okay. All right. Bye-bye.
[01:16:58.500 --> 01:16:59.500]  Bye-bye.
[01:16:59.500 --> 01:17:01.500]  Bye-bye.
[01:17:29.500 --> 01:17:38.500]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[01:17:38.500 --> 01:17:43.500]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:43.500 --> 01:17:49.500]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[01:17:49.500 --> 01:17:59.500]  So tune into Scripture Talk live on LocalsRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[01:17:59.500 --> 01:18:05.500]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.500 --> 01:18:09.500]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:18:09.500 --> 01:18:14.500]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win too.
[01:18:14.500 --> 01:18:20.500]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:18:20.500 --> 01:18:26.500]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:18:26.500 --> 01:18:34.500]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.500 --> 01:18:38.500]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:38.500 --> 01:18:41.500]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.500 --> 01:18:49.500]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:49.500 --> 01:19:12.500]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:19.500 --> 01:19:26.500]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:26.500 --> 01:19:32.500]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984 with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:19:32.500 --> 01:19:36.500]  I have a new caller up on the board, first-time caller, I do believe.
[01:19:36.500 --> 01:19:39.500]  This would be Andrea in Texas.
[01:19:39.500 --> 01:19:41.500]  Andrea, what can we do for you?
[01:19:41.500 --> 01:19:43.500]  Hey, Eddie, how are you?
[01:19:43.500 --> 01:19:44.500]  I'm good.
[01:19:44.500 --> 01:19:51.500]  I tried to respond to your email and your email server at your school bounced it back saying it was blocked.
[01:19:51.500 --> 01:19:54.500]  So I went ahead and used the phone number you added in the email.
[01:19:54.500 --> 01:19:59.500]  Fortunately, I could get in touch with you that way to text you and say, I'm on if you want to ask.
[01:19:59.500 --> 01:20:01.500]  Yes, thank you so much.
[01:20:01.500 --> 01:20:05.500]  And I'll get you a different email so we can, you know, work on that way as well.
[01:20:05.500 --> 01:20:09.500]  So my question is, so back in January I had a speeding ticket.
[01:20:09.500 --> 01:20:19.500]  So I filed all the paperwork that Randy had suggested, the special appearance, the arresting officer complaint,
[01:20:19.500 --> 01:20:24.500]  the notice of preservation of rights, the motion of in limine.
[01:20:24.500 --> 01:20:25.500]  I don't know how to say that.
[01:20:25.500 --> 01:20:26.500]  In limine.
[01:20:26.500 --> 01:20:28.500]  Limine, okay.
[01:20:28.500 --> 01:20:30.500]  And then challenge the subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:20:30.500 --> 01:20:35.500]  So I filed all of that plus the affidavit of status and the affidavit of fact.
[01:20:35.500 --> 01:20:41.500]  And when I filed it, it was the day of my court date.
[01:20:41.500 --> 01:20:44.500]  And when the lady, when I went to the clerk, she looked it up.
[01:20:44.500 --> 01:20:45.500]  Well, hang on a sec.
[01:20:45.500 --> 01:20:50.500]  When you say the day of your court date, court date to do what?
[01:20:50.500 --> 01:20:53.500]  Well, that was the court date on the ticket, the speeding ticket.
[01:20:53.500 --> 01:20:54.500]  I'm sorry.
[01:20:54.500 --> 01:20:55.500]  I got a speeding ticket.
[01:20:55.500 --> 01:20:57.500]  And that was the court date of the speeding ticket.
[01:20:57.500 --> 01:20:59.500]  That was your initial appearance date.
[01:20:59.500 --> 01:21:00.500]  Correct.
[01:21:00.500 --> 01:21:01.500]  Okay.
[01:21:01.500 --> 01:21:02.500]  Correct.
[01:21:02.500 --> 01:21:05.500]  And then when she looked it up, she said, oh, you don't have a court date.
[01:21:05.500 --> 01:21:07.500]  She's like, do you want to set a court date?
[01:21:07.500 --> 01:21:08.500]  I said, no.
[01:21:08.500 --> 01:21:12.500]  If after looking over the paperwork, they want to set one, they can let me know.
[01:21:12.500 --> 01:21:13.500]  And she said, okay.
[01:21:13.500 --> 01:21:15.500]  And she stamped off paperwork and that was it.
[01:21:15.500 --> 01:21:18.500]  And I haven't heard anything since.
[01:21:18.500 --> 01:21:19.500]  Okay.
[01:21:19.500 --> 01:21:22.500]  So what should I do?
[01:21:22.500 --> 01:21:23.500]  Should I follow up with them?
[01:21:23.500 --> 01:21:25.500]  Should I just let it go?
[01:21:25.500 --> 01:21:26.500]  Should I send something?
[01:21:26.500 --> 01:21:31.500]  Well, the thing is, is they are required to notify you if they set something up.
[01:21:31.500 --> 01:21:39.500]  Now, the problem is, is Texas courts are notorious for intentionally sending notices to the wrong address.
[01:21:39.500 --> 01:21:53.500]  They will intentionally go back and look up an old address and send everything to that rather than to the one that you have on the citation or whatever you put in your paperwork.
[01:21:53.500 --> 01:21:54.500]  They're notorious for that.
[01:21:54.500 --> 01:21:56.500]  They do that on purpose.
[01:21:56.500 --> 01:21:57.500]  Okay?
[01:21:57.500 --> 01:21:58.500]  Okay.
[01:21:58.500 --> 01:22:04.500]  So first rule of communicating with them, always do it in writing.
[01:22:04.500 --> 01:22:06.500]  Don't make phone calls.
[01:22:06.500 --> 01:22:09.500]  Don't do it in person unless you're recording it.
[01:22:09.500 --> 01:22:12.500]  Always do it in writing.
[01:22:12.500 --> 01:22:13.500]  Okay?
[01:22:13.500 --> 01:22:14.500]  Okay.
[01:22:14.500 --> 01:22:18.500]  That way you have an actual record of everything.
[01:22:18.500 --> 01:22:20.500]  Okay?
[01:22:20.500 --> 01:22:27.500]  So anything that you do and send in through the mail, make sure it's certified mail return receipt requested.
[01:22:27.500 --> 01:22:40.500]  If you carry it in and hand it to them in person, make sure they stamp not only what you give them but what you keep so that you have a court stamp showing the date and time it was filed with them, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:22:40.500 --> 01:22:41.500]  Okay?
[01:22:41.500 --> 01:22:42.500]  Okay.
[01:22:42.500 --> 01:22:45.500]  That way there's always a record.
[01:22:45.500 --> 01:22:46.500]  Right.
[01:22:46.500 --> 01:22:53.500]  So at this point, if I was going to send them something in writing, what would that be?
[01:22:53.500 --> 01:22:59.500]  If you're going to send them something in writing, you'd be requesting an update on the case.
[01:22:59.500 --> 01:23:03.500]  Did they give you a cause number of any kind?
[01:23:03.500 --> 01:23:04.500]  A cause number?
[01:23:04.500 --> 01:23:07.500]  No, I have a case number but not a cause number.
[01:23:07.500 --> 01:23:09.500]  Well, that's what a cause number is, is the case number.
[01:23:09.500 --> 01:23:10.500]  Oh, okay.
[01:23:10.500 --> 01:23:12.500]  Yes, I do have a case number.
[01:23:12.500 --> 01:23:14.500]  Okay.
[01:23:14.500 --> 01:23:23.500]  Then what you can do is you can check and see, just say, please give me an update on case number, blah, blah, blah, whatever it is that you've got.
[01:23:23.500 --> 01:23:28.500]  Please ensure that all communications are in writing and sent to this address.
[01:23:28.500 --> 01:23:33.500]  And make sure you supply the exact address in that written document that you want it sent to.
[01:23:33.500 --> 01:23:34.500]  Okay.
[01:23:34.500 --> 01:23:42.500]  And make sure you also state that all communications relative to this case are to be sent to that same address.
[01:23:42.500 --> 01:23:45.500]  Okay.
[01:23:45.500 --> 01:23:48.500]  All right.
[01:23:48.500 --> 01:23:53.500]  All right, so I'll follow up that way and see what happens from there.
[01:23:53.500 --> 01:24:04.500]  The other one was my son got a speedy ticket a month later, same city, same court, and he filed an affidavit of status, affidavit of fact, and the special appearance.
[01:24:04.500 --> 01:24:13.500]  So he went through his hearing or his court date and talked to the prosecutor and the prosecutor said, oh, so you're questioning jurisdiction.
[01:24:13.500 --> 01:24:14.500]  Let's set you up a hearing.
[01:24:14.500 --> 01:24:18.500]  And they set a hearing for April 14th or something like that.
[01:24:18.500 --> 01:24:23.500]  So did he file all of the motions that I filed as well?
[01:24:23.500 --> 01:24:25.500]  Yeah, he should.
[01:24:25.500 --> 01:24:27.500]  Okay.
[01:24:27.500 --> 01:24:41.500]  But I actually have a speeding motion that I'm giving away for free. So if you can get me an email address that I can actually contact you at and get it to you, and both of you can use it.
[01:24:41.500 --> 01:24:47.500]  But I have a motion specifically for fighting speeding charges in Texas.
[01:24:47.500 --> 01:24:49.500]  Okay.
[01:24:49.500 --> 01:25:00.500]  So when you file the motion, this is what I understand. So we file the motions and everything. Do we still go to the court date? Do we still show up at the hearings or do these motions, are they in lieu?
[01:25:00.500 --> 01:25:04.500]  If they send you a notice to appear, then yes, you go.
[01:25:04.500 --> 01:25:06.500]  Okay.
[01:25:06.500 --> 01:25:09.500]  And you make a record that you got there.
[01:25:09.500 --> 01:25:14.500]  You file something with the clerk of the court, even if it's a written notice.
[01:25:14.500 --> 01:25:27.500]  I hereby notice the court that I appeared on such-and-such date and such-and-such time in response to a notice to appear dated this date and time from this court signed by this individual.
[01:25:27.500 --> 01:25:41.500]  Always make a record, always, of every interaction you have, because that will help you so much later when you go back after them for everything they've done, which hopefully you will do.
[01:25:41.500 --> 01:25:45.500]  Oh, yes, I'm ready.
[01:25:45.500 --> 01:25:55.500]  So we go to the hearing. So is there a chance that if we file these motions, they will dismiss it before the hearing or do they wait until the hearing?
[01:25:55.500 --> 01:26:11.500]  They will try to drag it out to the very last second, if they possibly can, to get you to cave, to get you to withdraw something or do something or say something that will make what you filed irrelevant.
[01:26:11.500 --> 01:26:23.500]  So rule number one, under no circumstances are either of you to discuss one single element of the charge ever.
[01:26:23.500 --> 01:26:30.500]  Your argument is and shall focus on nothing but lack of jurisdiction.
[01:26:30.500 --> 01:26:37.500]  Never mention the charge. Never say I wasn't going this fast or that fast.
[01:26:37.500 --> 01:26:44.500]  Don't say how fast you were going. Don't even say you were in a damn car.
[01:26:44.500 --> 01:26:55.500]  Do not address a single element of the offense. The moment you do, you throw personal jurisdiction out the window.
[01:26:55.500 --> 01:27:07.500]  Now it's down to nothing but subject matter jurisdiction, which they can easily claim they have after you start talking.
[01:27:07.500 --> 01:27:14.500]  So what's the difference with subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction?
[01:27:14.500 --> 01:27:26.500]  Because they have to have jurisdiction over the offense, that subject matter, and then they have to have jurisdiction over the person who is alleged to have committed that offense.
[01:27:26.500 --> 01:27:33.500]  That's personal. The other form of jurisdiction they have to have is venue.
[01:27:33.500 --> 01:27:50.500]  Or territorial is another way of saying it. It must have happened in a place as a type of offense, a type of an offense, by a person over which they can all claim jurisdiction.
[01:27:50.500 --> 01:27:59.500]  Now the problem with subject matter jurisdiction here is not simply that the court can hear a case based upon the subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:27:59.500 --> 01:28:05.500]  See, there's another side of jurisdiction here, subject matter jurisdiction, that none of these idiots are looking at.
[01:28:05.500 --> 01:28:14.500]  And that is whether or not the subject matter jurisdiction applied to the person they're trying to accuse, just as much as it gives the court jurisdiction to hear.
[01:28:14.500 --> 01:28:26.500]  If the subject matter does not apply to the accused, then they can't get subject matter or personal jurisdiction ever.
[01:28:26.500 --> 01:28:29.500]  Right. Okay.
[01:28:29.500 --> 01:28:34.500]  Now, when I was in the court with him, and she was saying, well, this is criminal.
[01:28:34.500 --> 01:28:40.500]  And she read the rights basically in a nice type of way, you know, trying to schmooze everybody in the court.
[01:28:40.500 --> 01:28:46.500]  And I'm thinking like, well, what crime did I commit? There's no victim, right?
[01:28:46.500 --> 01:28:51.500]  Is the city, Mr. and Mrs. City of Pasadena going to show up and say, you know...
[01:28:51.500 --> 01:28:57.500]  No, they're not. And while you're right, you have to remember they're not charging you under criminal law.
[01:28:57.500 --> 01:29:05.500]  They're charging you under regulatory law, which is administrative law, which means due process doesn't work the same way.
[01:29:05.500 --> 01:29:11.500]  What they're doing with regulatory law is absolutely unconstitutional, and they damn well know it.
[01:29:11.500 --> 01:29:18.500]  But what they also know is that you don't. And that's how they get away with it.
[01:29:18.500 --> 01:29:23.500]  So while you're correct, there is no victim because it's a regulatory code.
[01:29:23.500 --> 01:29:28.500]  And they have established a presumption that you are somebody that code regulates.
[01:29:28.500 --> 01:29:33.500]  Hence, you are under the subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:29:33.500 --> 01:29:36.500]  Then they can use it against you. And that's what they do.
[01:29:36.500 --> 01:29:44.500]  The whole point of my seminar material is to prove that's not the case and give you the means to fight back.
[01:29:44.500 --> 01:29:50.500]  Hang on just a second. Let me get this break, and then we will come back and go on with your discussion, okay?
[01:29:50.500 --> 01:29:51.500]  All right. Thank you.
[01:29:51.500 --> 01:29:58.500]  Yep. All right, folks, 512-646-1984. If you want to call in, I can't guarantee I'll get everybody, but I'll certainly try.
[01:29:58.500 --> 01:30:00.500]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.500 --> 01:30:05.500]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number, and date of birth.
[01:30:05.500 --> 01:30:08.500]  But you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:30:08.500 --> 01:30:12.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:12.500 --> 01:30:19.500]  Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:19.500 --> 01:30:20.500]  That's creepy.
[01:30:20.500 --> 01:30:22.500]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:22.500 --> 01:30:25.500]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:25.500 --> 01:30:32.500]  Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:32.500 --> 01:30:36.500]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:36.500 --> 01:30:39.500]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:39.500 --> 01:30:42.500]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.500 --> 01:30:45.500]  Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere.
[01:30:45.500 --> 01:30:49.500]  But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it.
[01:30:49.500 --> 01:30:56.500]  I write blank spaces on forms all the time, or I write N slash A for not applicable, and usually nobody notices or cares.
[01:30:56.500 --> 01:31:03.500]  I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement,
[01:31:03.500 --> 01:31:09.500]  and I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually want them to call me, and that's pretty rare.
[01:31:09.500 --> 01:31:14.500]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:31:14.500 --> 01:31:16.500]  It's like exercising a muscle.
[01:31:16.500 --> 01:31:18.500]  It gets easier the more you do it.
[01:31:18.500 --> 01:31:19.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:19.500 --> 01:31:31.500]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.500 --> 01:31:35.500]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001.
[01:31:35.500 --> 01:31:39.500]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.500 --> 01:31:43.500]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.500 --> 01:31:47.500]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[01:31:47.500 --> 01:31:53.500]  over 1,200 architects and engineers looked into the evidence and believed there's more to the story.
[01:31:53.500 --> 01:31:56.500]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:56.500 --> 01:32:02.500]  Go to buildingwatt.org, why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:02.500 --> 01:32:06.500]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[01:32:06.500 --> 01:32:10.500]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.500 --> 01:32:13.500]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.500 --> 01:32:16.500]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:16.500 --> 01:32:20.500]  the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.500 --> 01:32:26.500]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.500 --> 01:32:29.500]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.500 --> 01:32:34.500]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:34.500 --> 01:32:36.500]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.500 --> 01:32:41.500]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.500 --> 01:32:46.500]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:46.500 --> 01:32:51.500]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.500 --> 01:32:55.500]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.500 --> 01:33:01.500]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:01.500 --> 01:33:16.500]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:31.500 --> 01:33:44.500]  Look at them yo-yos, that's the way you do it.
[01:33:44.500 --> 01:33:47.500]  You play the guitar on MTV.
[01:33:47.500 --> 01:33:51.500]  That ain't working, that's the way you do it.
[01:33:51.500 --> 01:33:54.500]  Money for nothing and you're too free.
[01:33:54.500 --> 01:33:58.500]  Now that ain't working, that's the way you do it.
[01:33:58.500 --> 01:34:02.500]  Let me show you, damn guys ain't dumb.
[01:34:02.500 --> 01:34:06.500]  Maybe get a pistol on your little finger.
[01:34:06.500 --> 01:34:09.500]  Maybe get a pistol on your thumb.
[01:34:09.500 --> 01:34:13.500]  We got to install a microwave oven.
[01:34:13.500 --> 01:34:16.500]  Custom kitchen delivery.
[01:34:16.500 --> 01:34:25.500]  I want my own cheese.
[01:34:25.500 --> 01:34:29.500]  Alright folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:34:29.500 --> 01:34:32.500]  Okay, now back to Andrea here real quick.
[01:34:32.500 --> 01:34:37.500]  Alright Andrea, I've got the motion here to fight the speeding citation.
[01:34:37.500 --> 01:34:48.500]  However, even if I email it to you, you do not want to file this until they have answered the jurisdictional challenge motion.
[01:34:48.500 --> 01:34:49.500]  Okay?
[01:34:49.500 --> 01:34:50.500]  Okay.
[01:34:50.500 --> 01:34:56.500]  Because again, this goes straight to merits, it blows merits right out of the water for them.
[01:34:56.500 --> 01:35:00.500]  They couldn't win this if they tried, even on merits.
[01:35:00.500 --> 01:35:01.500]  Okay.
[01:35:01.500 --> 01:35:11.500]  Based upon the information that's in this motion, because this information is all about the law they're intentionally misapplying and misinterpreting to use to steal money.
[01:35:11.500 --> 01:35:14.500]  Everything they're doing on a speeding citation is fraud.
[01:35:14.500 --> 01:35:19.500]  And once you read this motion, you're going to be spitting nail heads.
[01:35:19.500 --> 01:35:21.500]  Oh wow.
[01:35:21.500 --> 01:35:22.500]  Okay.
[01:35:22.500 --> 01:35:30.500]  So are they going to reply to the special appearance motion at the hearing or will they do that for you?
[01:35:30.500 --> 01:35:31.500]  You object.
[01:35:31.500 --> 01:35:40.500]  The problem is if you did not file a motion demanding a motions hearing prior to trial, that's exactly what they're going to try to do.
[01:35:40.500 --> 01:35:41.500]  Okay.
[01:35:41.500 --> 01:35:50.500]  And at the hearing, they're either going to say, oh, we have jurisdiction and if they do say they have jurisdiction, that's when I file the motion that you're going to email me.
[01:35:50.500 --> 01:35:51.500]  Correct.
[01:35:51.500 --> 01:35:52.500]  Okay.
[01:35:52.500 --> 01:35:53.500]  Okay.
[01:35:53.500 --> 01:36:03.500]  So I have another, I guess we're just a family of speeders here because my sister got a speeding ticket, but she was doing 23 over and it was written for that.
[01:36:03.500 --> 01:36:07.500]  It doesn't matter if she's doing Mach 12.
[01:36:07.500 --> 01:36:08.500]  Oh, okay.
[01:36:08.500 --> 01:36:09.500]  Okay.
[01:36:09.500 --> 01:36:21.500]  So they could charge her with reckless endangerment or something like that, but they could not charge her with speeding because there is no such offense in Texas law.
[01:36:21.500 --> 01:36:33.500]  And even if they did try to charge her with speeding, despite it not existing, the other problem is that they cannot prove the elements they're required to prove and they never do.
[01:36:33.500 --> 01:36:35.500]  They never even assert them in the complaint.
[01:36:35.500 --> 01:36:40.500]  For instance, have you read your criminal complaint?
[01:36:40.500 --> 01:36:44.500]  Or do you only have the citation?
[01:36:44.500 --> 01:36:46.500]  I only have the citation.
[01:36:46.500 --> 01:36:47.500]  Okay.
[01:36:47.500 --> 01:36:49.500]  They're required to file a criminal complaint.
[01:36:49.500 --> 01:36:52.500]  Do not let them tell you otherwise.
[01:36:52.500 --> 01:36:54.500]  Okay.
[01:36:54.500 --> 01:37:02.500]  But when you read the complaint, it will read pretty much exactly the same way the citation does because it will lack the following things.
[01:37:02.500 --> 01:37:15.500]  It will not make any assertion anywhere in either document that you failed to control your speed so as to have a collision with another person or vehicle already lawfully upon or entering the highway.
[01:37:15.500 --> 01:37:18.500]  Did that happen?
[01:37:18.500 --> 01:37:19.500]  No.
[01:37:19.500 --> 01:37:25.500]  Then they couldn't prove speeding even if it was an offense because that is a mandatory element.
[01:37:25.500 --> 01:37:28.500]  Okay.
[01:37:28.500 --> 01:37:36.500]  Simply going faster than the posted speed limit would not be an offense even if there was such an offense.
[01:37:36.500 --> 01:37:40.500]  Texas law is very clear on that.
[01:37:40.500 --> 01:37:48.500]  But they simply misinterpreted and misapply it to steal money by defrauding people who don't know any better.
[01:37:48.500 --> 01:37:51.500]  Right. Right.
[01:37:51.500 --> 01:37:55.500]  Well, I'm one of the people that knows better.
[01:37:55.500 --> 01:37:56.500]  Right.
[01:37:56.500 --> 01:37:58.500]  Yeah, and I'm trying to know better too.
[01:37:58.500 --> 01:38:03.500]  So I don't want to get taken advantage of or have my money stolen any more than anybody else.
[01:38:03.500 --> 01:38:18.500]  So I'm trying to get this down so that way when and if I do have to ever go to court and face these people, I know what to say and how to say it and don't say the wrong things and get me into a situation that, you know, I can't get out of.
[01:38:18.500 --> 01:38:26.500]  Well, if you will contact me at the same email address you use but use one that I can reply back to with this document, I will send you this motion.
[01:38:26.500 --> 01:38:34.500]  And the first thing you need to do, everybody you're talking about needs to do, is you all need to sit down and read and discuss this document together.
[01:38:34.500 --> 01:38:43.500]  Because the more you discuss it with somebody else that's going through the same thing, the more you're going to become in tune with what it says and what it means and you're going to understand it better.
[01:38:43.500 --> 01:38:51.500]  Then when you go to court and they start trying to argue with you, you're already way over their head in what you know.
[01:38:51.500 --> 01:39:03.500]  Way over their head. You read this motion, you will know more than any judge, any prosecutor and any defense attorney in this whole damn state about how to fight a speeding ticket.
[01:39:03.500 --> 01:39:07.500]  Wow. All right. I can't wait to get my hands on that then.
[01:39:07.500 --> 01:39:13.500]  And I have proven that more times than I care to count.
[01:39:13.500 --> 01:39:29.500]  Okay. Well, this has been wonderful. You've answered my questions. As of right now, I can't think of any more, but I'm sure they'll come up and I'll reach out to you and, you know, get this over with so these people can be out of my life.
[01:39:29.500 --> 01:39:42.500]  Okay. Well, if you have any more, like I say, give me an email I can reply back to and I'll be happy to answer them as best I can. I can't promise it'll always be immediate, but as soon as I can find it and see the email, I'll answer it.
[01:39:42.500 --> 01:39:54.500]  Yeah, I understand. No, I appreciate it because you responded very quickly to the one I sent. So I really appreciate that. So, and thank you for texting me and telling me to call in. It's been very helpful.
[01:39:54.500 --> 01:39:56.500]  Okay. Well, glad I can help.
[01:39:56.500 --> 01:39:58.500]  All right. Thanks, Eddie.
[01:39:58.500 --> 01:40:00.500]  Thanks, ma'am. You have a great night.
[01:40:00.500 --> 01:40:02.500]  You too. Bye bye.
[01:40:02.500 --> 01:40:04.500]  All right.
[01:40:04.500 --> 01:40:09.500]  Now that said, we have another caller up on the board, Ron in Oregon.
[01:40:09.500 --> 01:40:12.500]  Why do I have a feeling this isn't Ron?
[01:40:12.500 --> 01:40:15.500]  Well, can you hear me?
[01:40:15.500 --> 01:40:17.500]  I can hear you and it's not Ron, is it?
[01:40:17.500 --> 01:40:19.500]  Well, it's Ron.
[01:40:19.500 --> 01:40:23.500]  And how did you know that?
[01:40:23.500 --> 01:40:27.500]  I'd say because I've been on the board before I guess.
[01:40:27.500 --> 01:40:29.500]  That's a fact that I can tell.
[01:40:29.500 --> 01:40:33.500]  I've talked to both Randy and Brett in the past.
[01:40:33.500 --> 01:40:35.500]  Okay. Well, then that may be why you're up there.
[01:40:35.500 --> 01:40:41.500]  I have a phone here because it looks like you might have a little space to fill in and I've always got stuff going on here.
[01:40:41.500 --> 01:40:45.500]  So I want to just dial in on one little issue that we have going on here.
[01:40:45.500 --> 01:40:52.500]  We've had some people trying to steal a piece of land of ours for 10 years and it's kind of gone into some weird things.
[01:40:52.500 --> 01:40:58.500]  They actually gave it to their son, this piece of land that our access goes through,
[01:40:58.500 --> 01:41:04.500]  and they started trying to interlope on our property and everything.
[01:41:04.500 --> 01:41:10.500]  So as part of this land use thing, I sent up an email detailing this old existing road,
[01:41:10.500 --> 01:41:16.500]  which is on their deed and it's all mapped out in old photographs and everything.
[01:41:16.500 --> 01:41:20.500]  And I've been around here my whole life and I'm going on 74.
[01:41:20.500 --> 01:41:22.500]  So I know this stuff really well.
[01:41:22.500 --> 01:41:28.500]  And so I was basically showing them that, look, there's another road.
[01:41:28.500 --> 01:41:32.500]  You don't need to try and take over my road to do what you want to do here.
[01:41:32.500 --> 01:41:40.500]  So five months later, and we would actually drive on part of this road in the winter and stuff because it was easier.
[01:41:40.500 --> 01:41:42.500]  And it's mapped.
[01:41:42.500 --> 01:41:45.500]  It's on old there, photos and everything.
[01:41:45.500 --> 01:41:53.500]  And by Oregon law, when a road is used for 10 years, it's automatically a county road, county public road.
[01:41:53.500 --> 01:41:54.500]  So I wasn't going for that.
[01:41:54.500 --> 01:41:56.500]  I was just saying, look, there's this road there.
[01:41:56.500 --> 01:41:57.500]  Leave me alone.
[01:41:57.500 --> 01:41:58.500]  Do this other road.
[01:41:58.500 --> 01:42:01.500]  So nobody ever said, don't use it.
[01:42:01.500 --> 01:42:03.500]  No, we disagree.
[01:42:03.500 --> 01:42:11.500]  They're saying they're just about to say, okay, I'll just drive along a little bit here just to maintain use of it.
[01:42:11.500 --> 01:42:19.500]  So they set up a camera at some point and the story's a lot more complicated than this, but this is just this one issue.
[01:42:19.500 --> 01:42:31.500]  So then they get the sheriff to come in and give me a citation for misdemeanor trespass like five months later.
[01:42:31.500 --> 01:42:38.500]  And so I look at this thing and it's like one of those typical uniform citation things, you know, with all kinds of other words of stuff.
[01:42:38.500 --> 01:42:48.500]  And this guy cited a date that I supposedly was seen by somebody and they give me the citation.
[01:42:48.500 --> 01:42:49.500]  It says must appear in court.
[01:42:49.500 --> 01:42:53.500]  And it also has a thousand dollar fine thing on it.
[01:42:53.500 --> 01:42:58.500]  And so I've been through a couple of these things and I went to court and they never show up.
[01:42:58.500 --> 01:43:00.500]  The DA just declines to prosecute kind of thing.
[01:43:00.500 --> 01:43:11.500]  So anyway, on this one, I smelled a big fat rat going on because there was obviously a lot of communication and correspondence between parties to make this thing happen.
[01:43:11.500 --> 01:43:18.500]  So I didn't appear, but I submitted like almost 100 pages and documents of everything to do with this.
[01:43:18.500 --> 01:43:25.500]  And so then they had a party waiting for me at the court to appear for this arraignment deal.
[01:43:25.500 --> 01:43:34.500]  And they were planning to like arrest me and everything on the spot in the court had I appeared, which I did not.
[01:43:34.500 --> 01:43:38.500]  So now we have a bench war and nobody's doing anything.
[01:43:38.500 --> 01:43:46.500]  And it's going on, you know, 10 months later in this limbo of this thing.
[01:43:46.500 --> 01:43:48.500]  So I hear your music coming there.
[01:43:48.500 --> 01:43:49.500]  Yeah, hang on just a second.
[01:43:49.500 --> 01:43:53.500]  Let me get this break out of the way and we'll come right back and let you finish.
[01:43:53.500 --> 01:43:56.500]  All right, folks, we'll be right back for the last segment of the show.
[01:43:56.500 --> 01:44:00.500]  Y'all hang on.
[01:44:00.500 --> 01:44:06.500]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.500 --> 01:44:09.500]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:09.500 --> 01:44:11.500]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.500 --> 01:44:17.500]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.500 --> 01:44:25.500]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.500 --> 01:44:31.500]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.500 --> 01:44:39.500]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.500 --> 01:44:47.500]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.500 --> 01:44:51.500]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.500 --> 01:44:58.500]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:58.500 --> 01:45:00.500]  Order now.
[01:45:00.500 --> 01:45:03.500]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.500 --> 01:45:14.500]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.500 --> 01:45:18.500]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.500 --> 01:45:22.500]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.500 --> 01:45:27.500]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.500 --> 01:45:34.500]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.500 --> 01:45:43.500]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.500 --> 01:45:52.500]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.500 --> 01:46:01.500]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:01.500 --> 01:46:27.500]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:27.500 --> 01:46:34.500]  I am now in the last segment of tonight's show, and I am still talking with Ron in Oregon.
[01:46:34.500 --> 01:46:36.500]  All right, Ron, please continue.
[01:46:36.500 --> 01:46:42.500]  Okay, so at this point, I guess I'm looking at what advice you might have.
[01:46:42.500 --> 01:46:44.500]  We've been sitting here.
[01:46:44.500 --> 01:46:50.500]  I'm basically been under house arrest for 10 months, thinking that anytime I go out there,
[01:46:50.500 --> 01:46:55.500]  somebody might bounce on me and haul me in to do whatever they want to do for a failure to appear and everything.
[01:46:55.500 --> 01:47:01.500]  But this whole citation thing is basically flawed from the beginning.
[01:47:01.500 --> 01:47:08.500]  And also through some other court documents, evidence from this other side, this email surfaced.
[01:47:08.500 --> 01:47:20.500]  It clearly shows that this sheriff deputy who brought me this citation was engaged in a conspiratorial plot to set this thing up
[01:47:20.500 --> 01:47:29.500]  and pursue this citation for trespassing. Now, the Oregon law, on land, for there to be trespass,
[01:47:29.500 --> 01:47:33.500]  A, there has to be criminal intent for any kind of criminal charge.
[01:47:33.500 --> 01:47:38.500]  But also it has to be posted, no trespassing. There's no posting, no anything.
[01:47:38.500 --> 01:47:44.500]  Plus, five months earlier, I had made it clear to them that there was an old road there
[01:47:44.500 --> 01:47:48.500]  that actually came through this piece of property to our piece of property.
[01:47:48.500 --> 01:47:52.500]  And thinking that, OK, they'll see this as obvious. They know it's there.
[01:47:52.500 --> 01:47:57.500]  Maybe we can negotiate a little something, because I would be willing to vacate that road
[01:47:57.500 --> 01:48:04.500]  for them to just leave my main road alone, kind of thing, which is a deed of easement, by the way,
[01:48:04.500 --> 01:48:06.500]  a whole different topic.
[01:48:06.500 --> 01:48:13.500]  So I'm just interested in how best to deal with this warrant thing and this totally bogus citation
[01:48:13.500 --> 01:48:19.500]  that the more I've learned and looked at it, that this sheriff really had no business writing up,
[01:48:19.500 --> 01:48:25.500]  that nobody saw anything. He certainly didn't. He wrote it up a week after it allegedly occurred.
[01:48:25.500 --> 01:48:30.500]  He didn't claim anything about seeing anything, but he somehow got this into the DA's office.
[01:48:30.500 --> 01:48:35.500]  And I don't know if the judge might have been involved to get to the point where he would bring it out
[01:48:35.500 --> 01:48:44.500]  and hand it to me and, I guess, basically call it a summons. So that's where I'm at with this particular thing
[01:48:44.500 --> 01:48:48.500]  and wondering what your thoughts are about that. I love the whole jurisdiction thing,
[01:48:48.500 --> 01:48:52.500]  because I don't think they have either subject matter or personal jurisdiction.
[01:48:52.500 --> 01:48:57.500]  Probably. But here's something else. In order for him to have come to you,
[01:48:57.500 --> 01:49:02.500]  someone would have had to shown him something that had information about you on it.
[01:49:02.500 --> 01:49:06.500]  Let's assume for a second it's that camera you're talking about.
[01:49:06.500 --> 01:49:08.500]  Absolutely. Yeah. Yeah.
[01:49:08.500 --> 01:49:14.500]  So whatever picture was taken was given to the sheriff, which the sheriff didn't use to track you down
[01:49:14.500 --> 01:49:20.500]  via the picture it took, which I must presume has a license plate picture in it.
[01:49:20.500 --> 01:49:22.500]  I think you're right. Yeah.
[01:49:22.500 --> 01:49:27.500]  Now, here's the thing. Who verified the source of that picture?
[01:49:27.500 --> 01:49:36.500]  Where is the investigative documents that says where he got that information from?
[01:49:36.500 --> 01:49:42.500]  And how can he prove where that picture was actually taken?
[01:49:42.500 --> 01:49:45.500]  Because there's only two ways that could be done.
[01:49:45.500 --> 01:49:50.500]  Either someone told him verbally, this is our camera, we took this picture, and here it is to you,
[01:49:50.500 --> 01:49:57.500]  which he has absolutely no way to substantiate, absent something signed and sworn by them that it's true.
[01:49:57.500 --> 01:50:07.500]  Or they actually trespassed on your property to take him to that camera
[01:50:07.500 --> 01:50:11.500]  to let him see for himself this is where the camera that took this picture is,
[01:50:11.500 --> 01:50:16.500]  which they still don't have a way of actually proving,
[01:50:16.500 --> 01:50:22.500]  unless they do something with the metadata in the picture, should the camera have actually saved it,
[01:50:22.500 --> 01:50:28.500]  that matches that picture back to that camera at that location.
[01:50:28.500 --> 01:50:30.500]  Right. You know what I'm saying?
[01:50:30.500 --> 01:50:40.500]  And even if they're able to do that, all they could do is prove that I was in fact on an old road.
[01:50:40.500 --> 01:50:47.500]  That's exactly what it would prove, that you were only on an old road that you had every right to use,
[01:50:47.500 --> 01:50:52.500]  because it's a county road, and they can't trespass you from a county road.
[01:50:52.500 --> 01:50:59.500]  Right. So it's all intimidation, harassment, and everything.
[01:50:59.500 --> 01:51:07.500]  Well, look at it this way. They have now done something in your favor.
[01:51:07.500 --> 01:51:13.500]  Had you actually shown up and had they arrested you, you would have had an even bigger payday coming.
[01:51:13.500 --> 01:51:20.500]  But as of right now, if they pursue this, you've got malicious prosecution in the back.
[01:51:20.500 --> 01:51:23.500]  Yeah. Okay.
[01:51:23.500 --> 01:51:29.500]  If they arrest you, you've also got either false imprisonment or false arrest, whatever it is in Oregon.
[01:51:29.500 --> 01:51:39.500]  If they incarcerate you, then you've got most definitely false imprisonment and violations of multiple other rights.
[01:51:39.500 --> 01:51:41.500]  Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
[01:51:41.500 --> 01:51:49.500]  And they've then delivered my version of the Trezevant versus City of Tampa fee schedule.
[01:51:49.500 --> 01:51:53.500]  Well, I hope you updated it for inflation.
[01:51:53.500 --> 01:52:06.500]  Because the last time I checked Trezevant as of 2020, the value of Trezevant is 178% higher than it was in 1990, whatever it was when they said it.
[01:52:06.500 --> 01:52:19.500]  Yeah. So that $25,000 for 23 minutes is 173% more than that now.
[01:52:19.500 --> 01:52:25.500]  Yeah. And that was before Biden printed all that damn money. It's even higher than that.
[01:52:25.500 --> 01:52:29.500]  That's right. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Double that.
[01:52:29.500 --> 01:52:39.500]  So what would my next step be to address this? Just point those things out to them, their mistakes and file.
[01:52:39.500 --> 01:52:54.500]  But you need to file a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and no issue before the court because the evidence countermands the allegation on its face.
[01:52:54.500 --> 01:53:00.500]  Yeah. Yeah. Well, that's exactly what I was looking for, Eddie.
[01:53:00.500 --> 01:53:09.500]  Now, here's the problem. We're only assuming they used the picture from that camera. Right. OK. That's because that's all we've got to go on.
[01:53:09.500 --> 01:53:15.500]  But let's just assume the sheriff, they just told him and the sheriff agreed and said, OK, I'll do it.
[01:53:15.500 --> 01:53:21.500]  That's a whole nother ball of wax that puts them in even worse, deeper water.
[01:53:21.500 --> 01:53:37.500]  Yeah. Well, with this email that came out of their attorney on the civil stuff, the party complained to the sheriff, actually says in the email, did you cite Mrs. Thompson, too, because she was in the car with him.
[01:53:37.500 --> 01:53:44.500]  So there's some pretty bad intentions there when they had five months to say, hey, that's not really a road.
[01:53:44.500 --> 01:53:51.500]  You know, we don't want you to drive on it or anything like that. Instead, they just set up cameras and laid in wait.
[01:53:51.500 --> 01:53:58.500]  But I'm thinking that the people thinking that they were doing the trapping may have got trapped themselves.
[01:53:58.500 --> 01:54:05.500]  Yeah. They may not be thinking about that from that perspective. But the problem is, is you've got to get your hands on that photo.
[01:54:05.500 --> 01:54:17.500]  So if they're based upon if the claim is they use that camera to take a photo that they then gave to the sheriff to make the complaint, then you have a right to that photo through discovery.
[01:54:17.500 --> 01:54:22.500]  Yeah. Well, see, we haven't been to court yet because I didn't.
[01:54:22.500 --> 01:54:30.500]  You don't have to go to court to get discovery. File a motion for discovery, asking for all the evidence relative to the case or asking you to appear in court form.
[01:54:30.500 --> 01:54:35.500]  Yeah, we've asked for it, but we haven't filed a motion. So that would be the thing.
[01:54:35.500 --> 01:54:39.500]  Well, that's what you got to do. You have to file a discovery motion.
[01:54:39.500 --> 01:54:43.500]  Yeah. I understand that because we're doing that in the civil stuff.
[01:54:43.500 --> 01:54:53.500]  Yeah. So, okay. Thank you so much, Eddie. Those were the perfect answers and I understand them, which I may not have done a year ago.
[01:54:53.500 --> 01:54:57.500]  Well, good luck with it and hang in there.
[01:54:57.500 --> 01:55:01.500]  Okay. Thanks a lot, Eddie. We love listening to you guys there.
[01:55:01.500 --> 01:55:03.500]  Well, thank you. Appreciate it.
[01:55:03.500 --> 01:55:04.500]  Okay.
[01:55:04.500 --> 01:55:06.500]  All right. You have a great night, Ron.
[01:55:06.500 --> 01:55:07.500]  Bye-bye.
[01:55:07.500 --> 01:55:09.500]  Bye-bye.
[01:55:09.500 --> 01:55:19.500]  All right. I got just over three minutes and that would be Raider. Raider, you got less than three minutes.
[01:55:19.500 --> 01:55:27.500]  All right. Truth Raider here. Yeah, the other guy. That's the first caller I've heard calling from Oregon and I have to say more than five years.
[01:55:27.500 --> 01:55:39.500]  So that's amazing. So anyway, real quick, I'll just roll a couple items and then I'll ask you a question since we have to keep it in the interest of time here.
[01:55:39.500 --> 01:55:46.500]  There are two people that were doing what I'm doing, except they were doing it the wrong way and they were doing it years before I did.
[01:55:46.500 --> 01:55:53.500]  And I think it was about five or six years ago, this guy was impatient, apparently, and he played the game of chicken.
[01:55:53.500 --> 01:56:06.500]  He went around something, a diesel truck or something, and it went head on into another car and severely injuring the motorist and killing her guest.
[01:56:06.500 --> 01:56:12.500]  So he's now in an Oregon State penitentiary. He's not due for release until January 25.
[01:56:12.500 --> 01:56:19.500]  So what's going on is I think that's my problem. And it was around that time, as you remember years ago.
[01:56:19.500 --> 01:56:24.500]  Do you think your problem is that somebody else killed somebody?
[01:56:24.500 --> 01:56:28.500]  I think they did the same thing that I'm doing. So they think I'm more likely might do the same thing.
[01:56:28.500 --> 01:56:35.500]  What are you talking about the same thing that you're doing? What are we talking about when you say that?
[01:56:35.500 --> 01:56:42.500]  I think that I'm going to be careless and run into somebody and I don't have a license, registration or insurance.
[01:56:42.500 --> 01:56:50.500]  Is there something that would prevent a person that has all those things from doing the same stupid thing?
[01:56:50.500 --> 01:56:58.500]  It's possible because after that happened, they started stopping me all over the place and started impounding my truck and all that.
[01:56:58.500 --> 01:57:03.500]  Again, that is not an answer to my question.
[01:57:03.500 --> 01:57:12.500]  Can someone who has all those things still do the same stupid thing the other guy that you're talking about did?
[01:57:12.500 --> 01:57:14.500]  Yeah.
[01:57:14.500 --> 01:57:17.500]  And don't they do it all the time already?
[01:57:17.500 --> 01:57:19.500]  Yeah. Yeah, I know.
[01:57:19.500 --> 01:57:24.500]  Well, then that's not a proper basis to make an argument on for them or you.
[01:57:24.500 --> 01:57:30.500]  Yeah. After that occurred, though, I noticed I got stopped all the time after that.
[01:57:30.500 --> 01:57:34.500]  After it occurred, they let me alone for as I said nearly a year and then after that, they started stopping me.
[01:57:34.500 --> 01:57:41.500]  So good news. The last five times in the past year, I passed by them where they could have stopped me.
[01:57:41.500 --> 01:57:48.500]  There was one where there was the sheriff deputy behind me and all five times they refused to bother to stop me.
[01:57:48.500 --> 01:57:51.500]  They're leaving me alone.
[01:57:51.500 --> 01:57:54.500]  Well, that's what you were hoping for.
[01:57:54.500 --> 01:58:03.500]  Absolutely. Anyway, last question. If you had to do this all over again, Eddie, would you do this all over again if you can go back 25 years?
[01:58:03.500 --> 01:58:13.500]  If I knew what I knew sooner than I know it now, not only would I have done it again, I would have done it a lot harder, a lot faster and a lot more vicious.
[01:58:13.500 --> 01:58:17.500]  Amen. All right, brother. Good night and God bless.
[01:58:17.500 --> 01:58:18.500]  Yes, sir. You too, buddy.
[01:58:18.500 --> 01:58:19.500]  Thank you.
[01:58:19.500 --> 01:58:29.500]  Wireless caller, I'm sorry. I don't have enough time to get to you tonight. I apologize. If it's important, please send me an email to eddieddie at ruleoflawradio.com
[01:58:29.500 --> 01:58:32.500]  and I will try to get back to you as quickly as I can.
[01:58:32.500 --> 01:58:35.500]  Area code 775 it looks like.
[01:58:35.500 --> 01:58:38.500]  All right, folks. Thanks for calling. Thanks for listening.
[01:58:38.500 --> 01:58:42.500]  Please keep us in your financial well-being here whenever you can.
[01:58:42.500 --> 01:58:46.500]  Donate, whether it be to individually or to the network, we need you to survive.
[01:58:46.500 --> 01:58:49.500]  Y'all take care. Have a great week, good night and God bless.
[01:59:16.500 --> 01:59:20.500]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.500 --> 01:59:29.500]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.500 --> 01:59:32.500]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.500 --> 01:59:40.500]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.500 --> 01:59:49.500]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.500 --> 01:59:54.500]  Looking for some truth? You found it.
[01:59:54.500 --> 02:00:10.500]  Visit logosradionetwork.com