[00:00.000 --> 00:06.280] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution that guarantee [00:06.280 --> 00:09.480] the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.480 --> 00:10.920] Our liberty depends on it. [00:10.920 --> 00:14.880] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [00:14.880 --> 00:16.980] your First Amendment rights. [00:16.980 --> 00:18.560] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.560 --> 00:22.160] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.160 --> 00:26.940] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.940 --> 00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.000 --> 00:34.720] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:34.720 --> 00:39.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [00:39.000 --> 00:42.560] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.560 --> 00:44.640] Start over with Startpage. [00:44.640 --> 00:47.840] Spar, it's what fighters do. [00:47.840 --> 00:50.760] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:50.760 --> 00:54.560] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.560 --> 01:01.560] Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, [01:01.560 --> 01:03.080] and R for religion. [01:03.080 --> 01:07.080] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, [01:07.080 --> 01:10.480] assembly, and religion, but petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.480 --> 01:14.600] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.600 --> 01:18.120] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out [01:18.120 --> 01:20.800] the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:20.800 --> 01:31.160] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.160 --> 01:34.800] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.800 --> 01:38.240] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.240 --> 01:39.720] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.720 --> 01:43.640] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:43.640 --> 01:46.760] one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.760 --> 01:48.360] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.360 --> 01:52.760] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy [01:52.760 --> 01:56.760] is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:56.760 --> 02:01.880] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.880 --> 02:04.520] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:04.520 --> 02:08.800] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [02:08.800 --> 02:12.320] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.320 --> 02:15.920] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.920 --> 02:20.280] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill [02:20.280 --> 02:22.320] of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.320 --> 02:26.840] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms [02:26.840 --> 02:30.680] that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.680 --> 02:31.680] Get it? [02:31.680 --> 02:34.000] Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [02:34.000 --> 02:37.600] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:37.600 --> 02:43.360] when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary [02:43.360 --> 02:47.880] rights, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which [02:47.880 --> 02:50.560] historically has proved to always be possible. [02:50.560 --> 02:52.480] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [02:52.480 --> 03:15.920] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:15.920 --> 03:35.400] I'm Dr. Hubert Humphrey. [03:35.400 --> 03:46.920] Okay, howdy, howdy, we're in California. [03:46.920 --> 03:56.600] On this, the 10th day of March 2022, that's not with us yet, but I expect he'll show up [03:56.600 --> 03:57.600] pretty soon. [03:57.600 --> 04:03.680] Okay, I'm going to start out with what I've been working on. [04:03.680 --> 04:13.400] I got a ticket the other day here near where I live in a little small town and the policeman [04:13.400 --> 04:18.720] pulled me over because he said my license plate was obscured. [04:18.720 --> 04:26.360] I'm not sure what that meant because I looked at the license plate and you can read it easily, [04:26.360 --> 04:37.320] but he pulled me over and asked me, first he asked me for a license proof of insurance [04:37.320 --> 04:40.560] and I gave him a license and he said, do you have proof of insurance? [04:40.560 --> 04:41.560] I said, yeah, I do. [04:41.560 --> 04:43.560] I said, will you show it to me? [04:43.560 --> 04:49.280] No, you can go look that up on your computer, you have equal access to that. [04:49.280 --> 04:54.160] He said, well, I'll write you a ticket for the insurance, I don't care, go ahead. [04:54.160 --> 04:57.880] And he said, well, where's your registration, I don't have registration on your windshield. [04:57.880 --> 04:58.880] I said, I know. [04:58.880 --> 04:59.880] You don't have registration? [04:59.880 --> 05:00.880] Yes, I do. [05:00.880 --> 05:01.880] Where is it? [05:01.880 --> 05:02.880] It's in the club apartment. [05:02.880 --> 05:03.880] Why are you going to put it on the window? [05:03.880 --> 05:04.880] Well, I didn't want to. [05:04.880 --> 05:05.880] Then I need you to show it to me and I said, no. [05:05.880 --> 05:06.880] He said, well, then I'll write you a ticket. [05:06.880 --> 05:07.880] Okay, go ahead. [05:07.880 --> 05:08.880] That'll work. [05:08.880 --> 05:23.320] And he went back to his car to come back and he told me that my registration had expired [05:23.320 --> 05:25.440] in July. [05:25.440 --> 05:32.080] I said, wow, maybe that's the reason I should put it on my window. [05:32.080 --> 05:38.640] So he wrote me this ticket and I just went to his chief of police with first degree felony [05:38.640 --> 05:42.880] aggravated assault charges against him. [05:42.880 --> 05:54.360] And the chief tried to be in control and the dismissive and he asked me what the complaint [05:54.360 --> 05:55.360] was about. [05:55.360 --> 05:56.360] So here it is. [05:56.360 --> 05:57.360] Just read it. [05:57.360 --> 05:59.360] He said, I'm not going to take that. [05:59.360 --> 06:00.360] Oh, wow. [06:00.360 --> 06:01.360] Okay. [06:01.360 --> 06:02.360] That's certainly your call. [06:02.360 --> 06:05.880] And he said, well, what is your purpose here? [06:05.880 --> 06:12.360] Well, my purpose here is to invoke your duty under article 2.13 code of criminal procedure [06:12.360 --> 06:14.640] by giving you notice of crime. [06:14.640 --> 06:15.640] And I've done that. [06:15.640 --> 06:19.520] And you seem not to want to take that notice of crime. [06:19.520 --> 06:22.800] So I guess that's up to you. [06:22.800 --> 06:24.760] He said, well, what do you want me to do? [06:24.760 --> 06:29.160] I want you to do exactly what article 2.13 Texas code of criminal procedure commands [06:29.160 --> 06:31.480] you to do. [06:31.480 --> 06:36.320] And I didn't tell him what it says because I expect him to know it, but it says when [06:36.320 --> 06:40.800] a police officer has it made known to him that a crime has been committed, he needs [06:40.800 --> 06:44.760] to give notice of that crime to some magistrate. [06:44.760 --> 06:46.960] This is enough. [06:46.960 --> 06:49.520] It's not rocket science. [06:49.520 --> 06:58.720] And he seemed to think I was there to talk him into taking a complaint against his officer. [06:58.720 --> 07:02.560] I'm afraid he was badly mistaken. [07:02.560 --> 07:06.520] I was there to invoke his duty. [07:06.520 --> 07:08.120] That's it. [07:08.120 --> 07:11.680] I don't care if he agrees with my complaint or not. [07:11.680 --> 07:13.640] Don't care if he likes it or not. [07:13.640 --> 07:16.360] Don't care if he wants to act on it or not. [07:16.360 --> 07:23.120] Actually, those of you who listen to the show a lot, you'll know exactly what I wanted. [07:23.120 --> 07:28.200] And I wanted him not to do what I asked him to do. [07:28.200 --> 07:29.720] And he was very accommodating. [07:29.720 --> 07:33.360] But he figured out something else was going on. [07:33.360 --> 07:36.880] And he said, well, Miss Kelton, I don't know something right now. [07:36.880 --> 07:42.440] Can you come back tomorrow and we can talk about this so he can talk about it? [07:42.440 --> 07:47.000] But yeah, you know, I can come back tomorrow or any time they ask me something reasonable [07:47.000 --> 07:49.120] and I try to be reasonable. [07:49.120 --> 07:56.280] But after I left, I thought about it and decided there's nothing to talk about. [07:56.280 --> 07:57.400] I gave him the complaint. [07:57.400 --> 07:58.400] He didn't want to take it. [07:58.400 --> 08:04.640] So I will mail it to him, certified mail, and we won't have any further conversation. [08:04.640 --> 08:08.920] I guess there's nothing to converse about. [08:08.920 --> 08:17.440] He wants to decide if he believes a crime has been committed, but he's a public servant. [08:17.440 --> 08:19.080] Me? [08:19.080 --> 08:21.680] I'm a master of the servant. [08:21.680 --> 08:25.560] And when the master tells the servant that a crime has been committed, the servant has [08:25.560 --> 08:29.000] no power to overrule the master. [08:29.000 --> 08:31.480] That's my position. [08:31.480 --> 08:37.440] So you think you're my boss. [08:37.440 --> 08:38.720] And I have to answer you. [08:38.720 --> 08:43.400] Well, we'll see how that works out for you, because what I really want him to do is refuse [08:43.400 --> 08:47.040] to file the complaint with some magistrate. [08:47.040 --> 08:56.240] So when I don't have notice that a warrant has been issued within a week, then he has [08:56.240 --> 09:04.400] given it to a magistrate if I don't see evidence of a warrant, then I'm going to file criminal [09:04.400 --> 09:12.160] charges against the chief with the magistrate, which would happen to be the municipal court [09:12.160 --> 09:16.200] judge. [09:16.200 --> 09:18.160] Same deal. [09:18.160 --> 09:22.800] I'm giving notice to a magistrate that a crime has been committed. [09:22.800 --> 09:30.400] And when that happens under 16.09 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the magistrate is commanded [09:30.400 --> 09:36.040] by statute to issue a warrant forthwith. [09:36.040 --> 09:39.400] So I'm going to give him the complaint and he's going to want me to explain it to him. [09:39.400 --> 09:42.760] And I'm going to tell him, no, no, no, no, no, no. [09:42.760 --> 09:45.720] That's not how it works, Bubba. [09:45.720 --> 09:50.480] I give you the complaint, you take the complaint and issue a warrant. [09:50.480 --> 09:52.560] That's how it works. [09:52.560 --> 09:57.480] I'm not interested in your opinion about the sufficiency of the warrant because you can't [09:57.480 --> 10:00.440] have that opinion yet. [10:00.440 --> 10:06.560] You can't have that opinion until the accused is arrested and brought before you. [10:06.560 --> 10:15.320] Then you can call me before them, the tribunal, and have ourselves an examining trial. [10:15.320 --> 10:20.400] Then you can make a determination probable cause, not before. [10:20.400 --> 10:25.480] So what do you think they're going to do? [10:25.480 --> 10:31.600] Do you really think the judge is going to act on my first degree felony aggravated assault [10:31.600 --> 10:39.560] charges against the arresting officer and second degree felony shielding from prosecution [10:39.560 --> 10:42.280] against the chief of police? [10:42.280 --> 10:49.520] Nah, he's going to slither up behind that thin blue line. [10:49.520 --> 10:59.440] And when he does, I'll file two criminal charges against him and send him a tort letter. [10:59.440 --> 11:01.000] Let him know that I intend to sue him. [11:01.000 --> 11:09.880] I'm in the process of briefing out a suit against a magistrate for denying me in the [11:09.880 --> 11:19.400] due course of the law while acting in violation of an administrative duty. [11:19.400 --> 11:27.800] What you want is to put the judge or any official in a position to where they are commanded [11:27.800 --> 11:31.400] by law to do a thing. [11:31.400 --> 11:38.520] Like in this case, when a complaint is forwarded to a magistrate, the magistrate shall issue [11:38.520 --> 11:41.000] a warrant forthwith. [11:41.000 --> 11:44.300] That is not a judicial act. [11:44.300 --> 11:52.120] That is not an act over which the magistrate can exercise judicial discretion. [11:52.120 --> 11:55.360] It is an administrative act. [11:55.360 --> 11:59.760] It is a thing he is commanded to do. [11:59.760 --> 12:04.960] And when they fail to do something they're commanded to do, and they don't, when they [12:04.960 --> 12:09.840] fail to, that denies me and my right to petition the court for redress of grievance. [12:09.840 --> 12:19.440] I got great case law on that, that calls that a primary protection for the public and is [12:19.440 --> 12:29.200] absolutely outside the scope of the offending officer, an act for which they have zero immunity. [12:29.200 --> 12:37.240] What do you think is going to happen when I start suing judges in their personal capacity? [12:37.240 --> 12:42.360] It should get interesting. [12:42.360 --> 12:44.760] We do have some callers on. [12:44.760 --> 12:49.040] So that's enough on my latest fun and games. [12:49.040 --> 12:50.040] We got three callers. [12:50.040 --> 12:53.280] I'm going to go to Tina in California. [12:53.280 --> 12:54.800] Hello, Tina. [12:54.800 --> 12:56.520] What do you have for us today? [12:56.520 --> 12:58.520] This is Tina Darling. [12:58.520 --> 13:06.160] I have a quick question tonight. [13:06.160 --> 13:16.760] I filed a man to overturn what I believe is a void judgment because the judge had no jurisdiction [13:16.760 --> 13:23.160] because they administered my property when it wasn't in this person's bankruptcy. [13:23.160 --> 13:26.480] So I filed it with the appeal court. [13:26.480 --> 13:35.760] I sent a copy to the attorneys that did this, you know, felonious act. [13:35.760 --> 13:43.120] And I only have the address that was on the original notice of the motion. [13:43.120 --> 13:45.400] So that's where I sent it. [13:45.400 --> 13:51.080] I got the green card back saying return to sender unable to forward. [13:51.080 --> 14:00.880] Now do I have to search out where they might be now or whatever or can I just, hey, I sent [14:00.880 --> 14:07.320] it to the last known address on record that I have? [14:07.320 --> 14:11.440] Did you get that address from them? [14:11.440 --> 14:18.040] The address was the address that was on the motion they filed a few years ago because [14:18.040 --> 14:22.040] it was back in 2015 when they took my property. [14:22.040 --> 14:29.480] And that was the address that all the correspondence came from at that time. [14:29.480 --> 14:35.320] Was the address the address of an attorney, attorney's office? [14:35.320 --> 14:39.680] It was that attorney's office, the firm. [14:39.680 --> 14:40.680] Okay. [14:40.680 --> 14:49.400] Is the same attorney firm representing, wait, let me get the nature of this filing. [14:49.400 --> 14:55.600] Is this not an original filing but a filing into an existing case? [14:55.600 --> 15:01.400] This is a filing to overturn a judgment from 2015. [15:01.400 --> 15:02.400] Okay. [15:02.400 --> 15:09.240] Then the address that you have will be sufficient. [15:09.240 --> 15:17.440] If they change their address, this brings up an issue. [15:17.440 --> 15:20.800] Was there a final judgment in the case? [15:20.800 --> 15:21.800] Yes. [15:21.800 --> 15:22.800] Okay. [15:22.800 --> 15:32.400] So, if I'm sued and there's a final judgment in the case in the suit and then I move and [15:32.400 --> 15:38.560] change locations, there's no reason for me to give notice to the court that I changed [15:38.560 --> 15:42.960] location because from my perspective, the suit is over. [15:42.960 --> 15:47.040] So, I'm going to say you would have to find them. [15:47.040 --> 15:53.280] Did the objection include a proper mailing address? [15:53.280 --> 15:59.640] Yes, it included the mailing address that I had for them. [15:59.640 --> 16:09.040] Now, the interesting part here, this is where they used the mailbox rule against me and [16:09.040 --> 16:17.440] they said because they'd mailed it to my property address, not to my mailing address on record [16:17.440 --> 16:24.060] with the bank and where they had sent it before because I know they didn't want me to know [16:24.060 --> 16:32.400] about this notice and where they did not mail me a copy of the rule, the order, the judge's [16:32.400 --> 16:33.400] order. [16:33.400 --> 16:34.400] I never got a copy. [16:34.400 --> 16:35.400] Oh, you're running me off the cliff, Randy. [16:35.400 --> 16:36.400] It's your fault. [16:36.400 --> 16:37.400] Okay. [16:37.400 --> 16:38.400] We'll be right back. [16:38.400 --> 16:39.400] Wait a second. [16:39.400 --> 16:40.400] Okay. [16:40.400 --> 16:41.400] I'm concerned about this. [16:41.400 --> 16:42.400] This is confusing. [16:42.400 --> 16:43.400] You shifted gears there. [16:43.400 --> 16:44.400] So, let me come back. [16:44.400 --> 16:45.400] I want to shift back a ways to the document that you filed and make sure we're in a good [16:45.400 --> 16:46.400] position. [16:46.400 --> 16:47.400] Hang on, Randy Kelton. [16:47.400 --> 17:00.400] We'll be right back. [17:00.400 --> 17:05.120] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [17:05.120 --> 17:09.120] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [17:09.120 --> 17:13.440] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you [17:13.440 --> 17:14.440] can win too. [17:14.440 --> 17:19.360] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [17:19.360 --> 17:24.720] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to [17:24.720 --> 17:29.240] answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, [17:29.240 --> 17:33.880] how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [17:33.880 --> 17:39.000] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [17:39.000 --> 17:41.160] Personal consultation is available as well. [17:41.160 --> 17:46.680] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [17:46.680 --> 17:49.640] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [17:49.640 --> 17:59.120] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt [17:59.120 --> 18:01.560] collectors now. [18:01.560 --> 18:05.960] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [18:05.960 --> 18:06.960] Word? [18:06.960 --> 18:12.080] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central time for scripture [18:12.080 --> 18:17.600] talk where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [18:17.600 --> 18:23.000] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly [18:23.000 --> 18:25.400] dividing the word of truth. [18:25.400 --> 18:29.400] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse [18:29.400 --> 18:32.720] by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [18:32.720 --> 18:37.360] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [18:37.360 --> 18:39.720] and Christian character development. [18:39.720 --> 18:44.240] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [18:44.240 --> 18:48.640] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [18:48.640 --> 18:50.360] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [18:50.360 --> 18:57.480] So tune in to scripture talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and [18:57.480 --> 19:00.400] motivate your studies of the scriptures. [19:00.400 --> 19:30.040] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:30.040 --> 19:31.040] Okay. [19:31.040 --> 19:32.040] We are back. [19:32.040 --> 19:41.040] Brandon Telford, Brett Fountain, LogosRadio on this Thursday, the 10th day of March, 2022. [19:41.040 --> 19:53.080] And I just talked to Brett and poor guy, he's old and losing his memory, he'll be on eventually. [19:53.080 --> 19:58.800] I told him that I would be making disparaging remarks and jokes about him until he shows [19:58.800 --> 20:05.160] up, he has some company, so I told him not to be rude to his company, so he'll be on [20:05.160 --> 20:07.160] in a bit. [20:07.160 --> 20:08.160] Okay. [20:08.160 --> 20:10.880] I'm not the one that fell asleep this time. [20:10.880 --> 20:11.880] Okay. [20:11.880 --> 20:15.280] So I'm concerned here. [20:15.280 --> 20:27.040] You shifted gears from you filing a motion in this case to them filing a motion in the [20:27.040 --> 20:34.760] case and not sending it to you correctly, back to you filing the motion to reopen a [20:34.760 --> 20:37.920] case that's been closed. [20:37.920 --> 20:47.480] When they complained, did they give an address that was different than the address you used? [20:47.480 --> 20:48.480] No. [20:48.480 --> 20:53.480] This is the only address that I've ever known. [20:53.480 --> 20:56.600] No, no, no, no, no, stop, stop, stop. [20:56.600 --> 21:00.320] They filed an objection to your motion. [21:00.320 --> 21:02.720] They haven't done anything yet. [21:02.720 --> 21:06.480] Then what's the issue? [21:06.480 --> 21:13.760] I just filed, well, my question to you is I just filed in the appeal court the demand [21:13.760 --> 21:19.080] to vacate the judgment that I believe is void. [21:19.080 --> 21:24.960] So I want them to go back and overturn this void judgment for lack of jurisdiction. [21:24.960 --> 21:33.400] Now when they got that judgment, they sent me a notice of the motion to only to my property [21:33.400 --> 21:40.400] address, which I was not at at the time and which I had let the bank know of a different [21:40.400 --> 21:45.920] mailing address, which is what you're required to do this particular form. [21:45.920 --> 21:46.920] Okay. [21:46.920 --> 21:47.920] Now I get it. [21:47.920 --> 21:54.120] You're not saying that they objected that they didn't get your motion. [21:54.120 --> 21:56.560] They're objecting that you didn't get theirs. [21:56.560 --> 21:59.400] Yes, I didn't get theirs at the time. [21:59.400 --> 22:07.480] Now I sent a copy of my new demand to overturn the judgment to the only address I ever knew [22:07.480 --> 22:09.880] for this form. [22:09.880 --> 22:10.880] Now they may have moved. [22:10.880 --> 22:17.360] It says on the envelope in handwriting, they moved a few years ago, but they didn't say [22:17.360 --> 22:26.040] where and because maybe could I potentially give them their own medicine, they knew my [22:26.040 --> 22:30.400] correct address when they filed this motion and got a default judgment. [22:30.400 --> 22:31.400] They knew. [22:31.400 --> 22:32.400] Hold on. [22:32.400 --> 22:35.120] You can't do that. [22:35.120 --> 22:37.720] This case was over. [22:37.720 --> 22:46.240] So when they moved, they had no duty to notice, to file notice in a case that was ended of [22:46.240 --> 22:47.520] a change of address. [22:47.520 --> 22:50.920] So now they have to find a figure and see who they are. [22:50.920 --> 22:56.720] Yeah, all you have to do is serve them at the address that they now have. [22:56.720 --> 22:57.720] I don't know what that is. [22:57.720 --> 22:58.720] I have to find it. [22:58.720 --> 22:59.720] Yeah. [22:59.720 --> 23:00.720] Look it up. [23:00.720 --> 23:06.040] If they're a corporation, they should be easy enough to find, especially if they're a bank [23:06.040 --> 23:07.040] or a big corporation. [23:07.040 --> 23:15.000] If they're in California, they are required to have an address for service. [23:15.000 --> 23:18.520] Okay. [23:18.520 --> 23:23.360] I think they've changed the name of the company or merged with another one. [23:23.360 --> 23:28.160] Well, you should find that easy enough on Bloomberg. [23:28.160 --> 23:35.120] So I have to be the better person and find the correct address when they knew my correct [23:35.120 --> 23:40.000] address and mailed it to a wrong one just so that I would not get notice at that moment. [23:40.000 --> 23:45.520] The law doesn't change because they did something bad to you, that doesn't make it okay for [23:45.520 --> 23:50.120] you to do something bad to them. [23:50.120 --> 23:52.720] But they got a default on me and took my home. [23:52.720 --> 23:55.720] Yeah, but they're in the courts, Tina. [23:55.720 --> 24:03.840] If you did that to them, the court will root against you in a heartbeat. [24:03.840 --> 24:06.840] You have to touch all the bases. [24:06.840 --> 24:07.840] They don't. [24:07.840 --> 24:10.640] I'll try to figure out where they are. [24:10.640 --> 24:11.640] Yeah. [24:11.640 --> 24:17.520] That may not be fair, but it's what we have to deal with. [24:17.520 --> 24:18.520] Okay. [24:18.520 --> 24:24.440] Well, maybe I can bring it up that even though they didn't do the right thing, I did. [24:24.440 --> 24:28.720] Yeah, but that has no adjudicating value. [24:28.720 --> 24:29.720] No. [24:29.720 --> 24:36.560] Nothing we do, just really, anyway, I just have a quick question I wanted to ask tonight, [24:36.560 --> 24:40.280] so I'll let you know what the goal is because you don't have a lot of time tonight. [24:40.280 --> 24:41.280] Okay. [24:41.280 --> 24:42.280] Okay. [24:42.280 --> 24:43.280] Thanks a lot. [24:43.280 --> 24:44.280] Thank you, Tina. [24:44.280 --> 24:45.280] Bye. [24:45.280 --> 24:46.280] Okay. [24:46.280 --> 24:50.280] Now we're going to Tom. [24:50.280 --> 24:52.280] This looks like a first time caller. [24:52.280 --> 24:53.280] Okay. [24:53.280 --> 25:00.280] Maybe I can bring it up that even though they didn't do the right thing, I did. [25:00.280 --> 25:01.280] Yeah. [25:01.280 --> 25:02.280] Wait a minute. [25:02.280 --> 25:03.280] Wait a minute. [25:03.280 --> 25:10.280] If you're in the 541, 541 area code, and you have something going on in the background, [25:10.280 --> 25:15.280] it sounds like my own voice coming back. [25:15.280 --> 25:18.280] Can you shift that down? [25:18.280 --> 25:19.280] Okay. [25:19.280 --> 25:22.280] Now we're going to... [25:22.280 --> 25:23.280] Okay. [25:23.280 --> 25:30.280] Are you on a Bluetooth or a wireless device? [25:30.280 --> 25:36.280] I can't understand anything you're saying. [25:36.280 --> 25:38.280] It sounds like you're in a well. [25:38.280 --> 25:39.280] Okay. [25:39.280 --> 25:40.280] I'm not even sure if I'm getting anybody. [25:40.280 --> 25:41.280] It sounds like I'm getting something in the background. [25:41.280 --> 25:42.280] Okay. [25:42.280 --> 26:01.280] This looks like Rachel. [26:01.280 --> 26:02.280] Yes. [26:02.280 --> 26:07.280] I've got one here, so if you can hear me, hang up and call back. [26:07.280 --> 26:10.280] Maybe we'll get a better connection. [26:10.280 --> 26:15.280] Do you want me to call back, you said, Randy? [26:15.280 --> 26:16.280] This is Rachel. [26:16.280 --> 26:17.280] Oh. [26:17.280 --> 26:18.280] Now I can hear you perfectly. [26:18.280 --> 26:19.280] Do you have something in the background? [26:19.280 --> 26:20.280] Well, let's... [26:20.280 --> 26:21.280] Yeah. [26:21.280 --> 26:22.280] Here. [26:22.280 --> 26:23.280] Let me... [26:23.280 --> 26:28.280] I'm going to give me to my husband, Ron, and I'm going to move the computer. [26:28.280 --> 26:29.280] Hold on one moment. [26:29.280 --> 26:30.280] No, no. [26:30.280 --> 26:38.280] It sounds like a TV or something in the background. [26:38.280 --> 26:41.280] Okay. [26:41.280 --> 26:42.280] Okay. [26:42.280 --> 26:45.280] I think Rachel got the computer down here. [26:45.280 --> 26:46.280] Okay. [26:46.280 --> 26:47.280] That's much better. [26:47.280 --> 26:48.280] Okay. [26:48.280 --> 26:49.280] What do you have for... [26:49.280 --> 26:50.280] Wait a minute. [26:50.280 --> 26:51.280] I need a mic check. [26:51.280 --> 26:59.280] I've got a brand new microphone, and I've got it hooked to a mixer so that it feeds my [26:59.280 --> 27:04.280] voice back into my ear, and I hear myself breathing on the mic. [27:04.280 --> 27:07.280] Can you hear that? [27:07.280 --> 27:08.280] You know, I don't. [27:08.280 --> 27:12.280] Rachel wants me to put her phone on speaker here. [27:12.280 --> 27:14.280] I can hear you kind of faintly. [27:14.280 --> 27:16.280] Let's see what we got here. [27:16.280 --> 27:18.280] Where do we do this? [27:18.280 --> 27:19.280] Okay. [27:19.280 --> 27:26.280] If it's not disturbing, I'll check with someone with a better connection later. [27:26.280 --> 27:31.280] My prediction was out of town, so I wasn't able to do a proper mic check. [27:31.280 --> 27:33.280] Hang on just a second. [27:33.280 --> 27:34.280] Okay. [27:34.280 --> 27:37.280] Sorry. [27:37.280 --> 27:42.280] I'm having a bit of a throwing through today. [27:42.280 --> 27:48.280] I had COVID months or so ago, and it's left me with a bit of a hecking cough. [27:48.280 --> 27:53.280] I hear a lot of other people have the same thing. [27:53.280 --> 27:54.280] Okay. [27:54.280 --> 27:58.280] What do you have for us today? [27:58.280 --> 27:59.280] Okay. [27:59.280 --> 28:02.280] Have you got Ron and Rachel here? [28:02.280 --> 28:03.280] Yes. [28:03.280 --> 28:04.280] Hello. [28:04.280 --> 28:08.280] Boy, I'm barely, barely hearing you at all. [28:08.280 --> 28:09.280] We have a number of things. [28:09.280 --> 28:10.280] We have stuff. [28:10.280 --> 28:13.280] We write legal pleadings and crap every single day. [28:13.280 --> 28:17.280] It's a rare day that we only have one, but one thing that we're looking at here now, [28:17.280 --> 28:23.280] we have property and an easement that's been used to abuse and harass us for 10 years, [28:23.280 --> 28:27.280] and we've just recently been looking at declaratory judgments. [28:27.280 --> 28:34.280] And the easement language itself is very clear, but it gets twisted and manipulated [28:34.280 --> 28:37.280] by these lying shasters and everything. [28:37.280 --> 28:45.280] But in reading here, it really looks like asking the court for a declaratory judgment [28:45.280 --> 28:51.280] over our easement would pretty much solve all these problems. [28:51.280 --> 28:59.280] If your issue is based on a point of law, absolutely would sound like a good idea. [28:59.280 --> 29:00.280] Yeah. [29:00.280 --> 29:04.280] And I can't believe that this hasn't come up before. [29:04.280 --> 29:13.280] But I guess our big question is whether we should file for this into the case that's [29:13.280 --> 29:20.280] ongoing or whether it should be a separate filing just seeking this declaratory judgment [29:20.280 --> 29:21.280] from the court. [29:21.280 --> 29:23.280] I would suggest separate filing. [29:23.280 --> 29:30.280] If you file it into the current case, they're going to try to obfuscate the issue [29:30.280 --> 29:33.280] with everything else that's involved in the case. [29:33.280 --> 29:34.280] I agree. [29:34.280 --> 29:39.280] If you file a separate petition for declaratory judgment based on a single point of law, [29:39.280 --> 29:44.280] it will be a lot harder for them to misconstrue. [29:44.280 --> 29:49.280] Yeah, yeah, which is really all that they have ever tried to do. [29:49.280 --> 29:55.280] They really want to...the neighbors here with this thing really want our property [29:55.280 --> 30:01.280] and want to have done everything to make life miserable and hopes that we will... [30:01.280 --> 30:06.280] Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information, and you may trust them to keep it safe. [30:06.280 --> 30:11.280] But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets. [30:11.280 --> 30:15.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with details. [30:15.280 --> 30:20.280] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:20.280 --> 30:25.280] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:25.280 --> 30:30.280] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [30:30.280 --> 30:33.280] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.280 --> 30:37.280] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [30:37.280 --> 30:41.280] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:41.280 --> 30:44.280] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.280 --> 30:51.280] Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information. [30:51.280 --> 30:54.280] But what happens if it escapes their control? [30:54.280 --> 30:57.280] It's not an idle question. According to a recent survey, [30:57.280 --> 31:03.280] a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year. [31:03.280 --> 31:07.280] That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com. [31:07.280 --> 31:11.280] Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you. [31:11.280 --> 31:16.280] They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see. [31:16.280 --> 31:17.280] The cupboard would be bare. [31:17.280 --> 31:21.280] Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way. [31:21.280 --> 31:42.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:51.280 --> 31:55.280] There's more to the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. [31:55.280 --> 32:02.280] Go to buildingwatch.org. Why it's held, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:02.280 --> 32:05.280] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [32:05.280 --> 32:07.280] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [32:07.280 --> 32:12.280] If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:12.280 --> 32:15.280] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [32:15.280 --> 32:19.280] the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:19.280 --> 32:25.280] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:25.280 --> 32:28.280] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:28.280 --> 32:33.280] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is [32:33.280 --> 32:35.280] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:35.280 --> 32:40.280] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:40.280 --> 32:45.280] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [32:45.280 --> 32:50.280] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:50.280 --> 32:54.280] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:54.280 --> 32:59.280] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [32:59.280 --> 33:02.280] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:30.280 --> 33:32.280] Okay, we are back. [33:32.280 --> 33:37.280] We're in the Delta and Brett Fountain rule of law radio, and I think that sounds a little better. [33:37.280 --> 33:41.280] I've got a wind sock on my mic, so maybe you won't hear me. [33:41.280 --> 33:43.280] Heavy breathing. [33:43.280 --> 33:45.280] Okay. [33:45.280 --> 33:49.280] Well, you sound good here to Ron and Rachel, Randy. [33:49.280 --> 33:51.280] Okay, good. [33:51.280 --> 33:54.280] So I'm familiar with who you are now. [33:54.280 --> 33:55.280] It took a while. [33:55.280 --> 33:57.280] Yeah, yeah. [33:57.280 --> 34:02.280] We have such a convoluted, long-winded situation that's really quite amazing, [34:02.280 --> 34:07.280] and I think we got the clarity we were looking for on that declaratory judgment, [34:07.280 --> 34:13.280] and it just seems like it could solve all the problems, actually. [34:13.280 --> 34:23.280] And then our next issue here is that today we received an envelope with six proposed orders in it [34:23.280 --> 34:33.280] based on motions that the other parties, chastis, have submitted to the court. [34:33.280 --> 34:41.280] None of these motions have been heard at all, but today they've got six orders. [34:41.280 --> 34:43.280] Okay, that's proper. [34:43.280 --> 34:45.280] And a judge had ruled. [34:45.280 --> 34:47.280] That's proper. [34:47.280 --> 34:51.280] Excuse me, I'm having a little voice issue. [34:51.280 --> 34:53.280] Just a second. [34:53.280 --> 34:54.280] Okay. [34:54.280 --> 34:55.280] Okay. [34:55.280 --> 35:01.280] If you ask the judge to do something, in order to do what you ask the judge to do, [35:01.280 --> 35:04.280] he's going to have to issue an order. [35:04.280 --> 35:13.280] And the judges are busy, and they want you to prepare the order that you want the judge to sign [35:13.280 --> 35:16.280] and include it with the motion. [35:16.280 --> 35:24.280] I generally build an order, and I put in there what I want him to rule, and I put a section to initial, [35:24.280 --> 35:30.280] granted or denied, for each item that I want the judge to provide. [35:30.280 --> 35:37.280] It sounds like these guys have filed some motions, and they file the orders that they want the judge to sign. [35:37.280 --> 35:45.280] Now, if you don't like the orders, then you file an opposition and file your own order. [35:45.280 --> 35:48.280] Sometimes the judge won't use either one of them. [35:48.280 --> 35:50.280] He'll write his own. [35:50.280 --> 35:51.280] Sure. [35:51.280 --> 35:56.280] Or he'll take your order and scratch some out and add something to it. [35:56.280 --> 36:00.280] But it's just a courtesy to the court. [36:00.280 --> 36:01.280] Well, sure. [36:01.280 --> 36:09.280] But now, in the case of the motions, behind all this, the motions have never been heard by the court. [36:09.280 --> 36:14.280] You always send the order when you file the motion. [36:14.280 --> 36:16.280] That's kind of standard. [36:16.280 --> 36:17.280] Okay. [36:17.280 --> 36:19.280] Yeah, yeah, I've done that, actually, and had that. [36:19.280 --> 36:26.280] But still, can a judge actually sign an order and order something [36:26.280 --> 36:31.280] when the other party hasn't even been a part of a hearing on it? [36:31.280 --> 36:33.280] No. [36:33.280 --> 36:34.280] That's what I thought. [36:34.280 --> 36:37.280] Well, the judge could do anything he wants to, actually. [36:37.280 --> 36:40.280] Yes, they can sign the motion to respond to it. [36:40.280 --> 36:45.280] If the judge looks at it and he says, you know, all of this is straightforward [36:45.280 --> 36:52.280] and there's really no way the other side can oppose this, he can sign it sous-fonte. [36:52.280 --> 36:58.280] But like all other orders it gives you, you have grounds to appeal it. [36:58.280 --> 37:00.280] Sure, sure. [37:00.280 --> 37:03.280] But the fact that they're sending orders with the motions, [37:03.280 --> 37:07.280] they're sending the order sometime after they file the motion, [37:07.280 --> 37:11.280] that doesn't mean anything, that's kind of standard. [37:11.280 --> 37:14.280] Yeah, yeah. [37:14.280 --> 37:17.280] But it helps you get to see the order they're going to ask for. [37:17.280 --> 37:25.280] So it informs you as to what they're trying to get so you can better defend against it. [37:25.280 --> 37:26.280] Sure, yep. [37:26.280 --> 37:30.280] So which we can do quite easily enough because they're, like everything else, [37:30.280 --> 37:32.280] they're a little bit preposterous. [37:32.280 --> 37:34.280] So, okay. [37:34.280 --> 37:37.280] If we're clear. [37:37.280 --> 37:40.280] Do you ask for sanctions? [37:40.280 --> 37:42.280] Okay, yeah, yeah. [37:42.280 --> 37:44.280] Always, always ask for sanctions. [37:44.280 --> 37:47.280] That scares lawyers. [37:47.280 --> 37:53.280] Lawyers feel like a judge can sanction them at the drop of a hat. [37:53.280 --> 37:56.280] He can do it at his caprice. [37:56.280 --> 38:00.280] And they are right, he can. [38:00.280 --> 38:03.280] Lawyers are terrified of judges. [38:03.280 --> 38:07.280] They file an idiotic or preposterous motion that should be pointed out [38:07.280 --> 38:14.280] and you should ask for sanctions in order to maintain the integrity of the court. [38:14.280 --> 38:19.280] That the judge should be insulted by having to even read this thing [38:19.280 --> 38:21.280] and then bargain for it. [38:21.280 --> 38:23.280] Yeah, yeah, yeah. [38:23.280 --> 38:27.280] Well, one of the things that's been a little bit of a bugaboo in this process here [38:27.280 --> 38:35.280] is that the hearings that we have had have been online hearings via Webex [38:35.280 --> 38:39.280] and the court has blocked us out of them. [38:39.280 --> 38:42.280] That should get a criminal complaint against the judge. [38:42.280 --> 38:45.280] The court and the other side. [38:45.280 --> 38:47.280] Pardon? [38:47.280 --> 38:50.280] That should get a criminal complaint against the court. [38:50.280 --> 38:52.280] Yeah, yeah. [38:52.280 --> 38:58.280] If they block you, that's criminal. [38:58.280 --> 39:02.280] On like four hearings in a row. [39:02.280 --> 39:05.280] The hat should get criminal charges against the judge [39:05.280 --> 39:09.280] and a motion to disqualify the judge for incompetence. [39:09.280 --> 39:11.280] Yeah, I agree. [39:11.280 --> 39:15.280] We've written a ton of, you know, judicial complaints. [39:15.280 --> 39:19.280] Well, actually I did do a criminal complaint too, a pretty serious one. [39:19.280 --> 39:23.280] But okay. [39:23.280 --> 39:28.280] The best criminal complaints are the really tiny ones. [39:28.280 --> 39:34.280] When I started off the show today I was talking about setting up a magistrate [39:34.280 --> 39:41.280] so that I could get the magistrate to do something that all magistrates in Texas [39:41.280 --> 39:51.280] does and if you pay attention to any TV shows, all judges across the country do this. [39:51.280 --> 39:55.280] When they get a warrant, you know, you watch this movie and they want to get a warrant. [39:55.280 --> 39:57.280] Well, you don't have grounds for a warrant. [39:57.280 --> 40:02.280] Well, Texas law says it doesn't make any difference. [40:02.280 --> 40:08.280] If you file the complaint, the judge has no power to examine into the sufficiency of the complaint. [40:08.280 --> 40:10.280] He sees your warrant. [40:10.280 --> 40:13.280] Are you in Texas? [40:13.280 --> 40:15.280] We're in Oregon. [40:15.280 --> 40:16.280] Go ahead. [40:16.280 --> 40:18.280] Yeah. [40:18.280 --> 40:22.280] Well, that brings up the next little topic here. [40:22.280 --> 40:32.280] We're dealing with a situation where these neighbors pursued a criminal trespass charge against me. [40:32.280 --> 40:34.280] They had a sheriff do it. [40:34.280 --> 40:39.280] The sheriff came out here onto my property and hands me a citation. [40:39.280 --> 40:44.280] There actually were three different ones for mischief on our own easement. [40:44.280 --> 40:50.280] And I went to the first two and they weren't on the docket. [40:50.280 --> 40:53.280] Wait, wait, wait. Hold on. [40:53.280 --> 40:54.280] Okay. [40:54.280 --> 40:57.280] What state did you say you were in? [40:57.280 --> 40:59.280] Oregon. [40:59.280 --> 41:02.280] Oregon. Okay. [41:02.280 --> 41:05.280] Probably has the worst reputation of all. [41:05.280 --> 41:12.280] The officer served you with a citation. Where is that in code? [41:12.280 --> 41:16.280] I guess I need to ask some questions first. [41:16.280 --> 41:21.280] Who is the affidant? Was the affidant the officer who served the citation? [41:21.280 --> 41:24.280] Yes. [41:24.280 --> 41:28.280] I mean, if there even was one. [41:28.280 --> 41:34.280] Did the officer claim to personally see or hear the offense committed? [41:34.280 --> 41:38.280] No. [41:38.280 --> 41:44.280] Then how did he write a citation? [41:44.280 --> 41:50.280] Well, you know, we've been dealing with this other stuff where we're just getting into some discovery. [41:50.280 --> 41:57.280] And the other side just volunteered up some emails between this other party and the sheriff, [41:57.280 --> 42:02.280] convincing the sheriff to go and issue this citation. [42:02.280 --> 42:08.280] Wait, you can't do that. The sheriff can't issue the citation. [42:08.280 --> 42:15.280] No. I mean, you know, they're one of these uniform citations that look like a parking ticket, [42:15.280 --> 42:18.280] but they treat it like a summons. [42:18.280 --> 42:25.280] And my understanding is that the sheriff doesn't have judicial discretion to be issuing summons. [42:25.280 --> 42:36.280] Well, unless he personally saw or heard the offense being committed, unless there's some special law in Oregon, [42:36.280 --> 42:46.280] generally, you know, if I believe someone's committed a crime and I go to the sheriff in order for the sheriff to have any jurisdiction, [42:46.280 --> 42:51.280] I have to issue a verified criminal affidavit. [42:51.280 --> 42:59.280] I have to file the complaint, not the sheriff. He can't file a complaint for an offense he did not personally see or hear. [42:59.280 --> 43:01.280] Yeah. [43:01.280 --> 43:03.280] Wait, that's not exactly what happened. [43:03.280 --> 43:10.280] Of course it never happened, except there's only these conspiring emails between them. [43:10.280 --> 43:17.280] Wait a minute. Did he file the citation with the court? [43:17.280 --> 43:20.280] No. [43:20.280 --> 43:24.280] Then there is no citation. [43:24.280 --> 43:33.280] That's what I think. But the end result with this last thing is that I didn't go to the court for this because I kind of smell the big rat. [43:33.280 --> 43:38.280] So now they have a bench warrant out for me that's been in place for months. [43:38.280 --> 43:40.280] Okay, hold on. Yeah, we do have a problem. [43:40.280 --> 43:47.280] We're about to go to our sponsors, Randy Felton, and we'll pick this up on the other side. [43:47.280 --> 43:53.280] But if there's a bench warrant, then he definitely filed the complaint with the court. [43:53.280 --> 43:57.280] So we'll address this on the other side. We'll be right back. [43:57.280 --> 44:21.280] Okay. [44:27.280 --> 44:31.280] Ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. [44:31.280 --> 44:37.280] Now go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [44:37.280 --> 44:43.280] Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. [44:43.280 --> 44:44.280] Do I pay extra? [44:44.280 --> 44:45.280] No. [44:45.280 --> 44:47.280] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [44:47.280 --> 44:48.280] No. [44:48.280 --> 44:49.280] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [44:49.280 --> 44:50.280] No. [44:50.280 --> 44:51.280] I mean, yes. [44:51.280 --> 44:56.280] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. [44:56.280 --> 44:58.280] We are welcome. [44:58.280 --> 45:00.280] Happy holidays, Logos. [45:00.280 --> 45:03.280] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:03.280 --> 45:15.280] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:15.280 --> 45:22.280] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:22.280 --> 45:27.280] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:27.280 --> 45:34.280] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:34.280 --> 45:43.280] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.280 --> 45:52.280] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.280 --> 46:21.280] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [46:21.280 --> 46:22.280] Okay, we are back. [46:22.280 --> 46:28.280] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Rachel and... [46:28.280 --> 46:33.280] I've got T-H-O-M. Is that supposed to be Tom or... [46:33.280 --> 46:35.280] Hold on, let me unmute you there. [46:35.280 --> 46:39.280] T-H-O-M, P-S-O-M. [46:39.280 --> 46:41.280] Wait, say that again. [46:41.280 --> 46:45.280] T-H-O-M, P-S-O-M, Thompson. [46:45.280 --> 46:51.280] Okay, okay. Oh, okay. I got it. Okay. Okay. [46:51.280 --> 46:57.280] I don't know what I was thinking when I said the officer couldn't write the citation. Of course he can. [46:57.280 --> 47:06.280] Anybody can write a criminal complaint, whether they actually see or hear the offense committed or not. [47:06.280 --> 47:11.280] But when you go to court, the officer can't testify. [47:11.280 --> 47:12.280] Right. [47:12.280 --> 47:21.280] Whoever his witness is has to testify because the officer will only have hearsay evidence if hearsay evidence is not acceptable. [47:21.280 --> 47:31.280] There must be an attached affidavit. Did you have a statement of probable cause attached? [47:31.280 --> 47:38.280] Well, we immediately got a certified copy of the charging instrument, and there really wasn't much. [47:38.280 --> 47:46.280] There was just this thing by the sheriff and then a little deputy DA document that says, [47:46.280 --> 47:53.280] I have reason to believe, but I do believe that blah, blah, blah. And that's all. That's all there was. [47:53.280 --> 47:59.280] Okay. The blah, blah, blah is the part I need to see. [47:59.280 --> 48:08.280] If the blah, blah, blah establishes the elements of a criminal act, then the complaint is sufficient on a space. [48:08.280 --> 48:18.280] Yeah. Yeah. In this case, the little background is that these people have been trying to take over our easement to a land use application. [48:18.280 --> 48:25.280] And I pointed out to them that there is an old existing road to the property. It's been in my family my whole life. [48:25.280 --> 48:33.280] I'm going on 74 here. And the old road was access to this place. So they don't need our easement. [48:33.280 --> 48:38.280] So it's just an intimidation thing and trying to destroy our own property. [48:38.280 --> 48:46.280] Wait a minute. Hold on. Hold on. They're encouraging on an easement. What is the nature of the easement? [48:46.280 --> 48:52.280] The easement is on the deed. It's very clear. It's been in place for 50 years. [48:52.280 --> 49:02.280] No, no, no. My property has an easement for the gas company. It has an easement for the city to put in water. [49:02.280 --> 49:10.280] Right. What is the nature of the easement? It was an easement for roadway purposes. [49:10.280 --> 49:14.280] A lot was divided in half between my uncle and my father. [49:14.280 --> 49:23.280] And so this was an easement that was put in place for the benefit of our property, which was my father's to access it. [49:23.280 --> 49:28.280] Does it matter if it was put in for the purpose of a roadway? [49:28.280 --> 49:29.280] Yes. [49:29.280 --> 49:40.280] OK. I need to ask even more. Without the easement, would one of the properties be landlocked? [49:40.280 --> 49:42.280] Absolutely. [49:42.280 --> 49:52.280] Then the easement, whoever would be landlocked, has an absolute right to the easement. [49:52.280 --> 49:56.280] Yes, and that's us. [49:56.280 --> 50:01.280] It's a dominant tenement. It's a Serbian tenement. [50:01.280 --> 50:08.280] You're not the one encroaching on the easement. They are. So what are they doing to the easement? Are they blocking it? [50:08.280 --> 50:18.280] Well, they've blocked it. They've interfered. They want the piece of property. They want the easement to go away. [50:18.280 --> 50:28.280] The only way they could do that is to somehow harass us into giving them the property, they think, but it isn't going to happen. [50:28.280 --> 50:35.280] OK. What kind of harassment are they giving you? [50:35.280 --> 50:43.280] They interfere with the gate. They've ripped out fences along the easement. They harass us with surveillance cameras. [50:43.280 --> 50:51.280] They've actually destroyed a lot of the easement in this effort to take it over without any kind of declaratory judgment. [50:51.280 --> 50:55.280] In fact, the thing that sent us on that little path was that one of the… [50:55.280 --> 50:59.280] This is way too confusing. You're jumping all over the place. [50:59.280 --> 51:07.280] There's an easement. Do you have access to the property without this easement? [51:07.280 --> 51:10.280] No. [51:10.280 --> 51:12.280] So this is your road in and out. [51:12.280 --> 51:20.280] The easement language is very clear in the deed. There's nothing ambiguous about it. [51:20.280 --> 51:24.280] Have you sued them for their encroachments? [51:24.280 --> 51:33.280] Well, that's all going on right now. What happened in the last year is that they sold particular lots of this for a dollar. [51:33.280 --> 51:47.280] You're not really answering my question. Did you sue them and make a claim against them for the harm they did you through the easement? [51:47.280 --> 51:57.280] That is in the works right now. They actually tried to sue us for harassment and we have filed a counterclaim to that suit. [51:57.280 --> 52:06.280] And we've also filed a suit in federal court against them. [52:06.280 --> 52:16.280] Okay. You have them in federal court. Okay. How many complaints have they filed against you? [52:16.280 --> 52:24.280] Well, they filed this nuisance complaint because they're trying to interfere with our easement and we're not letting them. [52:24.280 --> 52:31.280] Okay. Wait, wait, wait. What you're doing is you're not telling me facts. You're just giving me argument on top of argument on top of argument. [52:31.280 --> 52:43.280] I can't get things sorted out. I don't know what is actually going on. How many criminal complaints have they filed against you? [52:43.280 --> 52:55.280] None. Well, this trespassing, which has nothing to do with the easement, has to do with another parallel older road that's on the record as a road. [52:55.280 --> 52:58.280] Now you're being – that's confusing. [52:58.280 --> 53:04.280] I know. It's a very confusing thing. And they make it that way. [53:04.280 --> 53:10.280] They have a lawyer who they've paid a ton of money to make it as confusing as possible for 10 years now. [53:10.280 --> 53:18.280] One of the things you talk about the they. Well, the they is a different they now because they put everything into their son's name. [53:18.280 --> 53:28.280] And so everything now has a different party to all the legal stuff, only they're still trying to use all the same prior legal stuff. [53:28.280 --> 53:33.280] So anyway, so that's where the declaratory judgment would come in. [53:33.280 --> 53:44.280] And I see it just make clear that easement. Your claims and issues are not clearly defined, [53:44.280 --> 53:51.280] or at least from what you're telling me, I'm getting nothing clearly defined. [53:51.280 --> 53:58.280] If in your pleadings you're jumping around like you are with me, if I were the judge, [53:58.280 --> 54:05.280] I would have a heck of a time figuring out what you're doing. This is all over the place. [54:05.280 --> 54:13.280] Well, it is. And the primary reason is because they hire these lawyers who file pleadings that are all over the place [54:13.280 --> 54:21.280] while we have to try and answer to those pleadings. And the whole thing is quite a dog's breath. [54:21.280 --> 54:27.280] You're talking to me and you're all over the place. I can't – I don't have a clue as to what's going on here. [54:27.280 --> 54:35.280] There's apparently two easements. One is an old world bid, so that's a state easement. [54:35.280 --> 54:45.280] The other one is a property easement. And some things are going on, but I have no idea what it is. [54:45.280 --> 54:50.280] And we've been talking for how long. If you're going to adjudicate this in court, [54:50.280 --> 54:56.280] you have to get this down to where you can tell somebody quickly what's going on. [54:56.280 --> 55:05.280] All this will do is confuse a judge or a jury. Have you written a timeline? [55:05.280 --> 55:10.280] Yes, I've done lots of timelines. And this is an ongoing thing. [55:10.280 --> 55:11.280] No, no, no. Wait, wait, wait. [55:11.280 --> 55:16.280] It's hard to write a timeline that can keep up with what's going on. [55:16.280 --> 55:24.280] Timeline – there can only be one. From start to finish, what has gone on? [55:24.280 --> 55:32.280] So that somebody can go down that timeline and get all these things and these pieces in place. [55:32.280 --> 55:37.280] I'm trying to get the information from you, and you're jumping all over the place. [55:37.280 --> 55:44.280] So I don't have – I've got a bunch of pieces of information. [55:44.280 --> 55:51.280] I have no idea how to stitch them together. I need a timeline for that. [55:51.280 --> 55:57.280] Everything has happened from the beginning to today. [55:57.280 --> 56:01.280] When we're in one of these circumstances… [56:01.280 --> 56:07.280] That would put the American jurisprudence to shame to write all that. [56:07.280 --> 56:13.280] See, you are very emotionally involved in what's going on. [56:13.280 --> 56:20.280] So when you're telling me about it, you jump from one emotional high point to the next to the next. [56:20.280 --> 56:24.280] Sometimes you jump in chronological order. Sometimes you jump from here. [56:24.280 --> 56:31.280] You jump, oh yeah, before that happened, this happened, and then after that, this over here happened, and you're all over the place. [56:31.280 --> 56:36.280] It's a real problem with the way memory works. [56:36.280 --> 56:42.280] Scientists used to think that we go inside and read and read memory. [56:42.280 --> 56:46.280] And they've done some experimentation on it and found that's not how it works. [56:46.280 --> 56:52.280] We go inside and take the memory out and re-experience it and put it back. [56:52.280 --> 56:59.280] The problem with that is depending on the context of the circumstance when you pulled it out, [56:59.280 --> 57:05.280] you will address what occurred based on the instant context. [57:05.280 --> 57:11.280] And then you'll put that memory back associated to this context. [57:11.280 --> 57:18.280] And sometimes that can get your memories out of place, out of chronological order. [57:18.280 --> 57:21.280] And that's what I'm hearing here. [57:21.280 --> 57:31.280] Things are, you're dealing with these based on your emotional responses to what you think was important [57:31.280 --> 57:35.280] and what affected you strongly when it occurred. [57:35.280 --> 57:44.280] I would look at this from a legal perspective, and I need it all connected together. [57:44.280 --> 57:55.280] So because there are things I will look for in between the happenings that you may or may not know to look for, [57:55.280 --> 57:58.280] I have a different experience set. [57:58.280 --> 58:01.280] So I need everything in order. [58:01.280 --> 58:06.280] So we move from this issue to the next issue to the next issue. [58:06.280 --> 58:13.280] If I can't get it in that order, I can never get this sorted out and figure out what the important pieces are. [58:13.280 --> 58:16.280] Am I making sense here? [58:16.280 --> 58:18.280] You are. [58:18.280 --> 58:22.280] But it is way more complicated than that and long. [58:22.280 --> 58:26.280] And I can only get about every other word from you. [58:26.280 --> 58:31.280] Anyway, we won't take any more of your time here with this. [58:31.280 --> 58:33.280] And thank you for that. [58:33.280 --> 58:34.280] Thank you. [58:34.280 --> 58:36.280] And we'll listen to you. [58:36.280 --> 58:37.280] Wait, wait, wait. [58:37.280 --> 58:40.280] Don't dodge. [58:40.280 --> 58:42.280] Don't dodge. [58:42.280 --> 58:43.280] Let's pick this up on the other side. [58:43.280 --> 58:44.280] I'm about to go to our sponsors. [58:44.280 --> 58:47.280] This is the most important thing you can do. [58:47.280 --> 58:48.280] Hang on. [58:48.280 --> 58:50.280] We'll be right back. [58:50.280 --> 58:53.280] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. [58:53.280 --> 58:57.280] Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [58:57.280 --> 59:01.280] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, [59:01.280 --> 59:06.280] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [59:06.280 --> 59:08.280] Enter the recovery version. [59:08.280 --> 59:13.280] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [59:13.280 --> 59:17.280] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:17.280 --> 59:21.280] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [59:21.280 --> 59:27.280] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:27.280 --> 59:32.280] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:32.280 --> 59:43.280] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:43.280 --> 59:47.280] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:47.280 --> 59:52.280] That's freestudybible.com. [59:52.280 --> 01:00:02.280] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:02.280 --> 01:00:06.280] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:00:06.280 --> 01:00:09.280] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:00:09.280 --> 01:00:11.280] Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:11.280 --> 01:00:14.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:00:14.280 --> 01:00:17.280] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:45.280 --> 01:00:48.280] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. [01:00:48.280 --> 01:00:52.280] They pull back the covers and find a third party there. [01:00:52.280 --> 01:00:55.280] He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. [01:00:55.280 --> 01:00:58.280] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me [01:00:58.280 --> 01:01:01.280] what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent. [01:01:01.280 --> 01:01:04.280] It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, [01:01:04.280 --> 01:01:07.280] a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. [01:01:07.280 --> 01:01:09.280] Third party? Third Amendment? Get it? [01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:13.280] So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, [01:01:13.280 --> 01:01:17.280] tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. [01:01:17.280 --> 01:01:22.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:32.280 --> 01:01:35.280] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:01:35.280 --> 01:01:39.280] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:01:39.280 --> 01:01:41.280] Our liberty depends on it. [01:01:41.280 --> 01:01:44.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:01:44.280 --> 01:02:12.280] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:02:15.280 --> 01:02:18.280] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, [01:02:18.280 --> 01:02:21.280] a magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray goggles. [01:02:21.280 --> 01:02:25.280] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom [01:02:25.280 --> 01:02:27.280] from unreasonable search and seizure. [01:02:27.280 --> 01:02:30.280] Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it? [01:02:30.280 --> 01:02:33.280] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights [01:02:33.280 --> 01:02:35.280] in the name of security. [01:02:35.280 --> 01:02:39.280] Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. [01:02:39.280 --> 01:02:43.280] When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, [01:02:43.280 --> 01:02:46.280] I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells. [01:02:46.280 --> 01:02:50.280] Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights [01:02:50.280 --> 01:02:53.280] and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. [01:02:53.280 --> 01:03:21.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:23.280 --> 01:03:30.280] Okay, we are back. [01:03:30.280 --> 01:03:34.280] I'm Randy Telpin, Brett Fountain, Google on radio. [01:03:34.280 --> 01:03:40.280] I'm talking to Tom in Oregon. [01:03:40.280 --> 01:03:47.280] You mentioned once on the Telegram channel about your neighbors [01:03:47.280 --> 01:03:55.280] cutting down an 800-year-old tree. [01:03:55.280 --> 01:03:59.280] Was that tree on the easement? [01:03:59.280 --> 01:04:01.280] Yes, right in the middle of it. [01:04:01.280 --> 01:04:07.280] Was that portion of the easement on your property or their property? [01:04:07.280 --> 01:04:19.280] Well, the entire easement is part of our deed that goes along the edge of this piece of property. [01:04:19.280 --> 01:04:22.280] Okay, hold on, hold on. [01:04:22.280 --> 01:04:30.280] Is the easement on your property line or outside your property line? [01:04:30.280 --> 01:04:40.280] Well, to make it, I guess, a little clearer to understand is that you can't actually have your own easement on your own land. [01:04:40.280 --> 01:04:45.280] There can be an easement that passes on your land. [01:04:45.280 --> 01:04:49.280] This easement is across someone else's property, [01:04:49.280 --> 01:04:56.280] and the easement grants you access to that easement for whatever purpose the easement was granted. [01:04:56.280 --> 01:05:02.280] In this particular circumstance, it was egress. [01:05:02.280 --> 01:05:07.280] The wording is for roadway purposes. [01:05:07.280 --> 01:05:13.280] Was that 800-year-old tree blocking the road? [01:05:13.280 --> 01:05:19.280] No, it hasn't blocked the road for 50 years that the easement's been there. [01:05:19.280 --> 01:05:25.280] Okay, then that tree belonged to the people who owned the property. [01:05:25.280 --> 01:05:31.280] Well, in a sense, you get into kind of an awkward area in the wording of the deed. [01:05:31.280 --> 01:05:33.280] So in a sense, the deed... [01:05:33.280 --> 01:05:40.280] The easement is an authorization to use the property for a specific purpose. [01:05:40.280 --> 01:05:43.280] If this is an easement for a roadway, [01:05:43.280 --> 01:05:52.280] that property still belongs to the people against whom the easement has been granted. [01:05:52.280 --> 01:05:59.280] They can't interfere with the easement in any way. [01:05:59.280 --> 01:06:05.280] Does an 800-year-old tree block the egress? [01:06:05.280 --> 01:06:12.280] When they dug a trench across the entire 30 feet of the easement, six feet deep, [01:06:12.280 --> 01:06:14.280] that was a pretty big interference with our easement. [01:06:14.280 --> 01:06:19.280] Nobody could come or go or do anything. [01:06:19.280 --> 01:06:23.280] I mean, now you just jump to something else. [01:06:23.280 --> 01:06:27.280] They cut a trench 30 feet deep? [01:06:27.280 --> 01:06:29.280] Yeah, to dig out all the roots and everything. [01:06:29.280 --> 01:06:31.280] It was a big old tree. [01:06:31.280 --> 01:06:35.280] Okay, did they fill it back in? [01:06:35.280 --> 01:06:37.280] What? [01:06:37.280 --> 01:06:41.280] Did they fill it back in? [01:06:41.280 --> 01:06:43.280] Yes. [01:06:43.280 --> 01:06:46.280] Okay, you don't have a claim. [01:06:46.280 --> 01:06:53.280] You're interfering with someone's use of their private property. [01:06:53.280 --> 01:06:59.280] They do anything they want to on that property as long as they don't block your egress. [01:06:59.280 --> 01:07:03.280] Yeah, we haven't made any claim about that. [01:07:03.280 --> 01:07:06.280] Oh, okay. [01:07:06.280 --> 01:07:12.280] It was just the manner in which it was done was criminal and with criminal intent. [01:07:12.280 --> 01:07:14.280] It was done without any kind of notice. [01:07:14.280 --> 01:07:19.280] If someone was here and had a heart attack or needed medical services or fire or anything, [01:07:19.280 --> 01:07:22.280] they couldn't have accessed it. [01:07:22.280 --> 01:07:31.280] Could you have driven around this on this other people's property even if it exceeded the easement? [01:07:31.280 --> 01:07:35.280] Not without trespassing. [01:07:35.280 --> 01:07:41.280] You're not trespassing in an emergency. [01:07:41.280 --> 01:07:44.280] You're just not. [01:07:44.280 --> 01:07:49.280] One of the problems we're having here, Randy, is that I don't hear half of the words that you're saying. [01:07:49.280 --> 01:07:52.280] I don't know if it's Rachel's phone here or what, [01:07:52.280 --> 01:07:58.280] but I'm trying to hold the conversation where I'm not hearing many of the words on the other side. [01:07:58.280 --> 01:08:01.280] Okay, yeah, maybe we're having a bad... [01:08:01.280 --> 01:08:02.280] Oh, maybe it's me. [01:08:02.280 --> 01:08:07.280] I've got a brand new mic, and it seems like this one's really sensitive. [01:08:07.280 --> 01:08:11.280] If I move a little too far to one side, you're losing me. [01:08:11.280 --> 01:08:12.280] Okay. [01:08:12.280 --> 01:08:14.280] Yeah. [01:08:14.280 --> 01:08:16.280] Now I'm getting a better picture of what's going on. [01:08:16.280 --> 01:08:20.280] This is an easement on someone else's property. [01:08:20.280 --> 01:08:28.280] The claims you can make on that property are very, very few. [01:08:28.280 --> 01:08:33.280] The only real claim you can have is that they block your egress. [01:08:33.280 --> 01:08:42.280] They interfere, easement interference is the language, and that's what they do to a large degree. [01:08:42.280 --> 01:08:56.280] Did you question these people and ask them if you could drive around that hole they dug while they were in the process of construction? [01:08:56.280 --> 01:09:00.280] Did they give you any indication they would block you from that? [01:09:00.280 --> 01:09:03.280] No, they didn't tell us that it was happening. [01:09:03.280 --> 01:09:05.280] In fact, they scheduled it to be done. [01:09:05.280 --> 01:09:06.280] No, no, no. [01:09:06.280 --> 01:09:11.280] You're answering the question I didn't ask. [01:09:11.280 --> 01:09:12.280] Yeah, they did. [01:09:12.280 --> 01:09:14.280] They cut a tree down on their own property. [01:09:14.280 --> 01:09:16.280] They own that property. [01:09:16.280 --> 01:09:20.280] It belongs to them. [01:09:20.280 --> 01:09:23.280] So long as they didn't block your egress. [01:09:23.280 --> 01:09:26.280] So how long was this hole dug? [01:09:26.280 --> 01:09:27.280] This is what they did. [01:09:27.280 --> 01:09:30.280] This is not really the big issue you have, is it? [01:09:30.280 --> 01:09:31.280] No, it isn't. [01:09:31.280 --> 01:09:33.280] We don't claim to own the tree. [01:09:33.280 --> 01:09:34.280] We don't want the tree. [01:09:34.280 --> 01:09:39.280] The tree's value was standing there as a beautiful big old growth tree. [01:09:39.280 --> 01:09:52.280] I think that's probably a strong argument that in removing this tree, it removed value from our property because we have to ask them for property. [01:09:52.280 --> 01:09:57.280] I've had a lot of people try to do that. [01:09:57.280 --> 01:10:14.280] If Oregon grants you the right to shade from that tree or there may be some right to – that's a good – it is an argument, but it's a very difficult argument to make. [01:10:14.280 --> 01:10:20.280] That would say that I can't do what I want to do with my property because somebody else may not like it. [01:10:20.280 --> 01:10:26.280] Is there a deed restriction on the properties? [01:10:26.280 --> 01:10:28.280] No. [01:10:28.280 --> 01:10:41.280] It's actually spelled out very clearly in the deed that that easement has the book and page number of our property on it and no others. [01:10:41.280 --> 01:10:42.280] So it's not like – [01:10:42.280 --> 01:10:43.280] Yeah. [01:10:43.280 --> 01:10:45.280] The easement was granted to you. [01:10:45.280 --> 01:10:46.280] Yeah. [01:10:46.280 --> 01:10:54.280] They're property, but they granted you an easement because you can't land – it's probably the same in Oregon. [01:10:54.280 --> 01:10:59.280] You cannot landlock property in most states. [01:10:59.280 --> 01:11:11.280] I had someone call me recently about a piece of landlocked property in Texas, and you can force them to give you an easement by filing a petitioning request. [01:11:11.280 --> 01:11:16.280] So you can't landlock property, and that's why they have to give you the easement. [01:11:16.280 --> 01:11:17.280] No. [01:11:17.280 --> 01:11:20.280] But it's still their property. [01:11:20.280 --> 01:11:21.280] Yeah. [01:11:21.280 --> 01:11:32.280] But the issue here, I guess the underlying issue is that all of a sudden after 50 years, we have the son now coming along and saying that he's going to use that road on that easement. [01:11:32.280 --> 01:11:39.280] When there's never been any agreement to use it, there's no agreement to maintain it, to quantify it, there's no alphabet or anything else. [01:11:39.280 --> 01:11:41.280] Wait a minute. [01:11:41.280 --> 01:11:44.280] The easement's on his property. [01:11:44.280 --> 01:11:45.280] Yeah. [01:11:45.280 --> 01:11:50.280] But that doesn't give him like to drive on the road on it that's not his. [01:11:50.280 --> 01:11:51.280] Okay. [01:11:51.280 --> 01:11:52.280] That's confusing. [01:11:52.280 --> 01:11:57.280] There's a road on the easement or on your property? [01:11:57.280 --> 01:12:02.280] It's a roadway easement that belongs to our property. [01:12:02.280 --> 01:12:04.280] It's on the deed to our property. [01:12:04.280 --> 01:12:15.280] If it's a roadway easement, unless Oregon is dramatically different from every other state, anyone can use a roadway easement. [01:12:15.280 --> 01:12:17.280] That's where the roadway is. [01:12:17.280 --> 01:12:18.280] Absolutely not. [01:12:18.280 --> 01:12:19.280] It's not on our deed. [01:12:19.280 --> 01:12:23.280] It's not on anyone else's deed. [01:12:23.280 --> 01:12:35.280] Then it's not a roadway. It's just on your property. You mentioned earlier, you can't have an easement on your own property. [01:12:35.280 --> 01:12:36.280] Yeah. [01:12:36.280 --> 01:12:40.280] So that's what they're trying to say now that they have this easement, that they have the full use of it. [01:12:40.280 --> 01:12:41.280] They don't. [01:12:41.280 --> 01:12:45.280] Where is this roadway defined? [01:12:45.280 --> 01:12:49.280] Defined in the deed language. [01:12:49.280 --> 01:12:55.280] So what does it say about that this is an easement for the purpose of a roadway? [01:12:55.280 --> 01:12:57.280] Does it say more than that? [01:12:57.280 --> 01:13:05.280] Does it say this is an easement for the purpose of a roadway to give access to your property or to give access to someone else's property? [01:13:05.280 --> 01:13:08.280] Or is it generally a roadway? [01:13:08.280 --> 01:13:19.280] It is on our deed as an easement that is clearly delineated. It is on the other property's deed under the Subject 2 item. [01:13:19.280 --> 01:13:23.280] That's one of four or five Subject 2 items on their deed. [01:13:23.280 --> 01:13:26.280] Subject 2, this easement. [01:13:26.280 --> 01:13:32.280] You have an easement and a roadway. Are those two different things? [01:13:32.280 --> 01:13:36.280] The roadway is on the easement. [01:13:36.280 --> 01:13:44.280] Okay. But if the easement is their property, he can use it. [01:13:44.280 --> 01:13:48.280] It's his property that he wants to, except block you from access. [01:13:48.280 --> 01:13:52.280] I know. That's absolutely not true. Absolutely not true. [01:13:52.280 --> 01:14:02.280] This doesn't make sense. You're saying that because you have an easement across his property that he can't use his property? [01:14:02.280 --> 01:14:07.280] He can't use it in any way that interferes with the easement. [01:14:07.280 --> 01:14:15.280] How do you have two different parties using an easement without one of them interfering with the other? [01:14:15.280 --> 01:14:27.280] There's more than one person using the roads out here. There's a lot of people using the roads. They're not interfering with each other. [01:14:27.280 --> 01:14:38.280] Did he say he's going to use the easement, the property, in a way that would interfere with the easement? [01:14:38.280 --> 01:14:42.280] Absolutely. [01:14:42.280 --> 01:14:45.280] What did he say he was going to do with it? [01:14:45.280 --> 01:14:50.280] Drive on a road that's been there for 50 years before he came along. [01:14:50.280 --> 01:14:58.280] You're objecting to him driving on a road? [01:14:58.280 --> 01:15:00.280] What's that? [01:15:00.280 --> 01:15:04.280] I said you're objecting to him driving on a road? [01:15:04.280 --> 01:15:13.280] On my road that I built, that I maintain. I don't maintain the road for anyone else to use. [01:15:13.280 --> 01:15:19.280] There's been no agreement, no contract for anybody else to use it. I'm not going to do that for his benefit. [01:15:19.280 --> 01:15:27.280] If it's a roadway easement, then he can use the easement. [01:15:27.280 --> 01:15:30.280] No, he absolutely cannot. [01:15:30.280 --> 01:15:32.280] What law says that? [01:15:32.280 --> 01:15:40.280] There is a ton of easement law. Anything in AMJR, everything agrees. [01:15:40.280 --> 01:15:44.280] AMJR doesn't mean anything. AMJR is general. [01:15:44.280 --> 01:15:56.280] What do you have in all of the law that restricts the use of a road access easement? [01:15:56.280 --> 01:16:01.280] I'm not hearing many of your words, but I'll tell you one thing. Rachel and I are experts on easement law. [01:16:01.280 --> 01:16:06.280] We've read a ton of it, all the AMJR stuff from Steve Emerson. [01:16:06.280 --> 01:16:08.280] I'm trying to beat that. It's not making sense. [01:16:08.280 --> 01:16:11.280] Nothing supports what you're saying. [01:16:11.280 --> 01:16:15.280] Did you build a roadway on the easement? [01:16:15.280 --> 01:16:17.280] Yes. [01:16:17.280 --> 01:16:24.280] And you're saying because you built a roadway on the easement that's on his property that he can't use it? [01:16:24.280 --> 01:16:28.280] Yeah, he doesn't need to use it. The only reason he would use it is to interfere. [01:16:28.280 --> 01:16:31.280] That's irrelevant. That's not irrelevant what he needs, what he doesn't need. [01:16:31.280 --> 01:16:46.280] Does urban law prevent him from using the roadway on his property because he maintains the roadway? [01:16:46.280 --> 01:16:51.280] Imagine two cars, two different parties going head-to-head on a road. [01:16:51.280 --> 01:16:56.280] Who has to get off the easement to let this person pass? How does that work? [01:16:56.280 --> 01:17:01.280] Okay, hang on. [01:17:01.280 --> 01:17:06.280] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? [01:17:06.280 --> 01:17:12.280] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk, [01:17:12.280 --> 01:17:17.280] where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [01:17:17.280 --> 01:17:24.280] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. [01:17:24.280 --> 01:17:28.280] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, [01:17:28.280 --> 01:17:32.280] where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [01:17:32.280 --> 01:17:39.280] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. [01:17:39.280 --> 01:17:44.280] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [01:17:44.280 --> 01:17:50.280] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [01:17:50.280 --> 01:18:00.280] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [01:18:00.280 --> 01:18:05.280] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:18:05.280 --> 01:18:09.280] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [01:18:09.280 --> 01:18:15.280] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two. [01:18:15.280 --> 01:18:21.280] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, [01:18:21.280 --> 01:18:27.280] what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, [01:18:27.280 --> 01:18:34.280] how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:18:34.280 --> 01:18:39.280] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:18:39.280 --> 01:18:41.280] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:18:41.280 --> 01:18:49.280] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com. [01:18:49.280 --> 01:19:12.280] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:19:20.280 --> 01:19:23.280] Don't bore me. [01:19:27.280 --> 01:19:28.280] Okay. [01:19:28.280 --> 01:19:29.280] We are back. [01:19:29.280 --> 01:19:32.280] Randy Carlin with Carlin's Rule of Law Radio. [01:19:32.280 --> 01:19:35.280] Tom, I think we should do this on the Telegram channel. [01:19:35.280 --> 01:19:39.280] I've got three segments and three more callers. [01:19:41.280 --> 01:19:44.280] This is a little too complex for this show. [01:19:45.280 --> 01:19:47.280] Just hang up. [01:19:47.280 --> 01:19:54.280] Yeah, let's do this on the Telegram channel. [01:19:54.280 --> 01:20:02.280] This is taking up too much time or call back tomorrow night when I've got four hours. [01:20:02.280 --> 01:20:03.280] Okay. [01:20:03.280 --> 01:20:04.280] Hi, Randy. [01:20:04.280 --> 01:20:05.280] Okay. [01:20:05.280 --> 01:20:07.280] We'll talk to you later. [01:20:07.280 --> 01:20:09.280] We really appreciate your help. [01:20:09.280 --> 01:20:10.280] Yeah. [01:20:10.280 --> 01:20:12.280] And I'm not trying to be difficult. [01:20:12.280 --> 01:20:13.280] I'm on your side. [01:20:13.280 --> 01:20:14.280] I know. [01:20:14.280 --> 01:20:19.280] And I'm trying to figure out how to frame this so that you can hammer the other side. [01:20:19.280 --> 01:20:24.280] But if I can't get it sorted out, the court is not going to either. [01:20:24.280 --> 01:20:26.280] Exactly. [01:20:26.280 --> 01:20:27.280] Okay. [01:20:27.280 --> 01:20:28.280] I hear you. [01:20:28.280 --> 01:20:34.280] Then let's call back tomorrow night and we'll go over on this in more detail. [01:20:34.280 --> 01:20:36.280] You got it. [01:20:36.280 --> 01:20:38.280] Thank you so much, Randy. [01:20:38.280 --> 01:20:39.280] Bye-bye. [01:20:39.280 --> 01:20:40.280] Thank you. [01:20:40.280 --> 01:20:41.280] Okay. [01:20:41.280 --> 01:20:43.280] Now we're going to go to Chris in New York. [01:20:43.280 --> 01:20:45.280] Hello, Chris. [01:20:45.280 --> 01:20:46.280] Wait a minute. [01:20:46.280 --> 01:20:47.280] Let me check. [01:20:47.280 --> 01:20:48.280] Now hang on, Chris. [01:20:48.280 --> 01:20:51.280] I've got a first-time caller. [01:20:51.280 --> 01:20:52.280] I'll get to you. [01:20:52.280 --> 01:20:55.280] Chris knows me real well, so I can pick on him a little bit. [01:20:55.280 --> 01:20:59.280] I'll get you after the first-time caller. [01:20:59.280 --> 01:21:00.280] Okay. [01:21:00.280 --> 01:21:01.280] Oh, no, that's not right. [01:21:01.280 --> 01:21:02.280] That's E.J. [01:21:02.280 --> 01:21:03.280] Okay. [01:21:03.280 --> 01:21:04.280] Sorry, E.J. [01:21:04.280 --> 01:21:05.280] You're not a first-time caller. [01:21:05.280 --> 01:21:07.280] I'm going to go back to Chris. [01:21:07.280 --> 01:21:11.280] Chris has been calling into the show for years. [01:21:11.280 --> 01:21:16.280] And he always calls in at the end of the show, and I never get to him. [01:21:16.280 --> 01:21:22.280] So what do you have for us tonight, Chris, who called in early? [01:21:22.280 --> 01:21:24.280] Wrong Chris again. [01:21:24.280 --> 01:21:31.280] I'm the Chris that was mind-worn that I killed in a couple weeks ago. [01:21:31.280 --> 01:21:34.280] You're not the Chris in the bankruptcy. [01:21:34.280 --> 01:21:41.280] No, I'm the Chris that got arrested and reigned with a vacated bench warrant, and you told [01:21:41.280 --> 01:21:49.280] me to send you the information two weeks ago to your email, and I sent you my factual allegations [01:21:49.280 --> 01:21:52.280] regarding...because there was multiple cases. [01:21:52.280 --> 01:22:01.280] There was a fraud on court that was the first thing concerning a DEWE that the original [01:22:01.280 --> 01:22:06.280] bench warrant was issued, but I already had cleared those matters up. [01:22:06.280 --> 01:22:13.280] And then when I cleared those matters up, I settled for one DEWE, and then I instantly [01:22:13.280 --> 01:22:21.280] put a vacate ordering for fraud on the court because they had removed court records. [01:22:21.280 --> 01:22:26.280] Somebody as a court officer removed court records when the case got transferred from [01:22:26.280 --> 01:22:28.280] one court to another court. [01:22:28.280 --> 01:22:33.280] Well, is that the one where the email said, where is this document, or where is this...I [01:22:33.280 --> 01:22:37.280] think I got four or five of those. [01:22:37.280 --> 01:22:42.280] That is a really big deal. [01:22:42.280 --> 01:22:45.280] I'm sorry, one more time, Randy. [01:22:45.280 --> 01:22:48.280] I said that is a really big deal. [01:22:48.280 --> 01:22:55.280] If you have documents filed in the court, it is the duty of the clerk to maintain those [01:22:55.280 --> 01:22:59.280] records in the court that you're in. [01:22:59.280 --> 01:23:06.280] Is it an inferior court or a county or district court? [01:23:06.280 --> 01:23:12.280] The reason I'm asking it this way is in the inferior courts, like the Justice of the [01:23:12.280 --> 01:23:18.280] Peace and municipal, the clerk is not an elected official. [01:23:18.280 --> 01:23:24.280] So the duty concerning records goes to the judge. [01:23:24.280 --> 01:23:31.280] If it's a county or a district where the clerk is elected, then the clerk is responsible [01:23:31.280 --> 01:23:33.280] for the record. [01:23:33.280 --> 01:23:37.280] It doesn't matter if the judge comes down and orders the clerk to do something with [01:23:37.280 --> 01:23:40.280] the records. [01:23:40.280 --> 01:23:45.280] The judge doesn't have that power, and he doesn't have the duty to maintain the records. [01:23:45.280 --> 01:23:52.280] So who is required to maintain the records in this case? [01:23:52.280 --> 01:23:59.280] In the municipality court or town court, you just told me the judge is responsible. [01:23:59.280 --> 01:24:05.280] Correct? [01:24:05.280 --> 01:24:07.280] Hello? [01:24:07.280 --> 01:24:08.280] Something's wrong. [01:24:08.280 --> 01:24:10.280] Hello? [01:24:10.280 --> 01:24:16.280] Oh, this is not good. [01:24:16.280 --> 01:24:18.280] I've lost something. [01:24:18.280 --> 01:24:21.280] I can hear you. [01:24:21.280 --> 01:24:23.280] Okay, you can hear me now? [01:24:23.280 --> 01:24:25.280] Correct. [01:24:25.280 --> 01:24:27.280] Something's wrong. [01:24:27.280 --> 01:24:28.280] I'm not hearing myself. [01:24:28.280 --> 01:24:31.280] I should be hearing myself in my microphone. [01:24:31.280 --> 01:24:34.280] So something's messing up. [01:24:34.280 --> 01:24:36.280] As long as you can hear me. [01:24:36.280 --> 01:24:37.280] I can hear you. [01:24:37.280 --> 01:24:39.280] Okay. [01:24:39.280 --> 01:24:41.280] Okay, so this is a municipal court. [01:24:41.280 --> 01:24:42.280] So great. [01:24:42.280 --> 01:24:44.280] You get to hammer the judge. [01:24:44.280 --> 01:24:48.280] Great, because I want to. [01:24:48.280 --> 01:24:51.280] He hasn't answered my vacate order. [01:24:51.280 --> 01:24:53.280] He hasn't ruled on it either way. [01:24:53.280 --> 01:25:01.280] I obviously served the district assistant district attorney that was involved in that case. [01:25:01.280 --> 01:25:05.280] It was a vacate order for fraud on court. [01:25:05.280 --> 01:25:10.280] I sent him multiple letters requesting that he rule on it. [01:25:10.280 --> 01:25:14.280] It's been more than a year, and I'm now ready to proceed. [01:25:14.280 --> 01:25:15.280] Oh, wait. [01:25:15.280 --> 01:25:17.280] You're in New York? [01:25:17.280 --> 01:25:19.280] I'm in New York. [01:25:19.280 --> 01:25:24.280] I actually had a Chris in New York, Chris Cappanella, several years ago. [01:25:24.280 --> 01:25:37.280] And he filed a complaint, a judicial conduct complaint against the judge because the judge didn't hear his case for over a year. [01:25:37.280 --> 01:25:41.280] And they actually sanctioned the judge. [01:25:41.280 --> 01:25:43.280] That was amazing. [01:25:43.280 --> 01:25:46.280] Who did he file the complaint with, Randy? [01:25:46.280 --> 01:25:47.280] Hold on. [01:25:47.280 --> 01:25:48.280] My phone is acting up. [01:25:48.280 --> 01:25:49.280] Okay. [01:25:49.280 --> 01:25:56.280] Chris was in Albany. [01:25:56.280 --> 01:25:58.280] Hello? [01:25:58.280 --> 01:25:59.280] Come on. [01:25:59.280 --> 01:26:01.280] What is wrong with my system? [01:26:01.280 --> 01:26:02.280] I don't know. [01:26:02.280 --> 01:26:06.280] It's bad enough, though. [01:26:06.280 --> 01:26:07.280] Can you hear me now? [01:26:07.280 --> 01:26:08.280] Okay. [01:26:08.280 --> 01:26:11.280] Now I've got my voice back. [01:26:11.280 --> 01:26:15.280] I'm not sure what's going on, but can you hear me now? [01:26:15.280 --> 01:26:16.280] I can hear you. [01:26:16.280 --> 01:26:17.280] Okay. [01:26:17.280 --> 01:26:21.280] This may be the Skype connection. [01:26:21.280 --> 01:26:25.280] Now I can hear my own voice back in my own ears. [01:26:25.280 --> 01:26:27.280] Okay. [01:26:27.280 --> 01:26:32.280] New York sometimes will actually go after judges. [01:26:32.280 --> 01:26:44.280] So this should get a criminal complaint against the judge and a judicial conduct complaint against the judge and a petition for writ of mandamus in the county court. [01:26:44.280 --> 01:26:45.280] Oh, in New York. [01:26:45.280 --> 01:26:46.280] So yeah. [01:26:46.280 --> 01:26:48.280] Motion to compel? [01:26:48.280 --> 01:26:49.280] Yeah. [01:26:49.280 --> 01:26:51.280] Motion to compel. [01:26:51.280 --> 01:27:06.280] A mandamus or writ of mandate is where you ask a higher court to order a lower court to do what they're required to do. [01:27:06.280 --> 01:27:12.280] And the way it is in Texas, we have municipal and JP courts. [01:27:12.280 --> 01:27:17.280] An appeal from a municipal or JP court would go to the county court. [01:27:17.280 --> 01:27:22.280] That's the lowest level elected judge. [01:27:22.280 --> 01:27:28.280] From that court, an appeal would go to the court of appeals. [01:27:28.280 --> 01:27:36.280] The reason it jumps over the higher courts is because that's an elected judge and he's a lawyer and he's expected to know the law. [01:27:36.280 --> 01:27:46.280] So an appeal for one of the higher courts always goes to the court of appeals, but from the lower courts, it goes to the county court first. [01:27:46.280 --> 01:27:54.280] So you petition the county court to order the municipal court to do what the law commands them to do. [01:27:54.280 --> 01:27:57.280] That's going to embarrass them. [01:27:57.280 --> 01:28:02.280] And then you file a judicial conduct complaint against them. [01:28:02.280 --> 01:28:05.280] Who's the criminal complaint get filed with? [01:28:05.280 --> 01:28:10.280] I know how to do the judicial complaint because I've already filed judicial complaints on this guy before. [01:28:10.280 --> 01:28:11.280] He is a lawyer. [01:28:11.280 --> 01:28:17.280] So I will be filing judicial complaints and bar grievances now because of multiple things. [01:28:17.280 --> 01:28:21.280] You know, I just wanted him to rule on it. [01:28:21.280 --> 01:28:28.280] If you bar grieve him, that'll make him feel like he's being mistreated and put upon. [01:28:28.280 --> 01:28:29.280] Yeah, sorry, Bubba. [01:28:29.280 --> 01:28:31.280] Life is tough. [01:28:31.280 --> 01:28:40.280] But okay, if you've done that, certainly New York is like most every other state. [01:28:40.280 --> 01:28:52.280] All criminal complaints go to some magistrate and every district has a magistrate. [01:28:52.280 --> 01:28:53.280] Can you hear me? [01:28:53.280 --> 01:28:55.280] No, you just cut out. [01:28:55.280 --> 01:29:01.280] I heard you right up until you said the criminal complaint goes to a magistrate. [01:29:01.280 --> 01:29:02.280] I understand. [01:29:02.280 --> 01:29:04.280] Okay. [01:29:04.280 --> 01:29:11.280] Any magistrate and generally every judge in the state is also a magistrate. [01:29:11.280 --> 01:29:14.280] Can I ask you one question, Randy? [01:29:14.280 --> 01:29:15.280] Yes, quickly. [01:29:15.280 --> 01:29:17.280] We've got 45 seconds. [01:29:17.280 --> 01:29:18.280] Okay. [01:29:18.280 --> 01:29:21.280] The ADA is now a judge. [01:29:21.280 --> 01:29:24.280] Can I send the criminal that was on that case? [01:29:24.280 --> 01:29:28.280] Can I send the criminal complaint about this judge to that guy since I'm bringing him both [01:29:28.280 --> 01:29:30.280] to federal court eventually? [01:29:30.280 --> 01:29:33.280] Yes, if he's a magistrate, he's a judge. [01:29:33.280 --> 01:29:41.280] Absolutely. [01:29:41.280 --> 01:29:42.280] I can't see much. [01:29:42.280 --> 01:29:47.280] Okay, now my system is fading in and out and I'm not sure what it is. [01:29:47.280 --> 01:29:48.280] Hang on. [01:29:48.280 --> 01:29:49.280] We're going to our sponsors. [01:29:49.280 --> 01:29:50.280] We're going to kill them. [01:29:50.280 --> 01:29:52.280] Brett Fountain. [01:29:52.280 --> 01:29:54.280] Brett Fountain's not even here to trump. [01:29:54.280 --> 01:30:02.280] Randy Sheldon, we'll be right back. [01:30:02.280 --> 01:30:09.280] Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing. [01:30:09.280 --> 01:30:12.280] But now researchers say we can add stress to the list. [01:30:12.280 --> 01:30:16.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment. [01:30:16.280 --> 01:30:18.280] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:18.280 --> 01:30:22.280] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:22.280 --> 01:30:27.280] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:27.280 --> 01:30:28.280] So protect your rights. [01:30:28.280 --> 01:30:32.280] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.280 --> 01:30:35.280] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:35.280 --> 01:30:42.280] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:42.280 --> 01:30:46.280] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:46.280 --> 01:30:49.280] Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects? [01:30:49.280 --> 01:30:52.280] If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart. [01:30:52.280 --> 01:30:56.280] But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain. [01:30:56.280 --> 01:31:00.280] A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons, [01:31:00.280 --> 01:31:04.280] which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems. [01:31:04.280 --> 01:31:10.280] Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex. [01:31:10.280 --> 01:31:16.280] That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions. [01:31:16.280 --> 01:31:18.280] So take a deep breath and chill out. [01:31:18.280 --> 01:31:21.280] It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack. [01:31:21.280 --> 01:31:31.280] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.280 --> 01:31:36.280] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.280 --> 01:31:38.280] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:38.280 --> 01:31:43.280] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.280 --> 01:31:46.280] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.280 --> 01:31:49.280] And thousands of my fellow first responders have died. [01:31:49.280 --> 01:31:50.280] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.280 --> 01:31:51.280] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.280 --> 01:31:53.280] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:53.280 --> 01:31:54.280] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.280 --> 01:31:55.280] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.280 --> 01:31:58.280] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.280 --> 01:32:02.280] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:02.280 --> 01:32:06.280] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [01:32:06.280 --> 01:32:08.280] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, [01:32:08.280 --> 01:32:10.280] and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [01:32:10.280 --> 01:32:13.280] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:32:13.280 --> 01:32:16.280] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [01:32:16.280 --> 01:32:18.280] the right to act in our own private capacity, [01:32:18.280 --> 01:32:20.280] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:32:20.280 --> 01:32:24.280] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce [01:32:24.280 --> 01:32:26.280] and preserve our rights through due process. [01:32:26.280 --> 01:32:29.280] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [01:32:29.280 --> 01:32:32.280] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [01:32:32.280 --> 01:32:34.280] that will help you understand what due process is [01:32:34.280 --> 01:32:36.280] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:32:36.280 --> 01:32:38.280] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material [01:32:38.280 --> 01:32:41.280] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [01:32:41.280 --> 01:32:43.280] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, [01:32:43.280 --> 01:32:46.280] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [01:32:46.280 --> 01:32:48.280] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [01:32:48.280 --> 01:32:51.280] hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [01:32:51.280 --> 01:32:55.280] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:55.280 --> 01:33:02.280] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:02.280 --> 01:33:05.280] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, [01:33:05.280 --> 01:33:33.280] Logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:33.280 --> 01:33:38.280] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [01:33:38.280 --> 01:33:41.280] And we're talking to Chris in New York. [01:33:41.280 --> 01:33:50.280] And is this over traffic or what is the nature of these complaints? [01:33:50.280 --> 01:33:56.280] The original case that we're just talking about was about a dealing. [01:33:56.280 --> 01:33:59.280] So that would be civil infraction. [01:33:59.280 --> 01:34:06.280] Where we were first going initially, so the bench warrant was issued at one time. [01:34:06.280 --> 01:34:08.280] The bench warrant was vacated. [01:34:08.280 --> 01:34:12.280] So where I was going with that, just recently on February 9, [01:34:12.280 --> 01:34:15.280] I was arrested on that vacated bench warrant. [01:34:15.280 --> 01:34:22.280] Then I had an ADA misinform the judge and try to tell him the bench warrant was for fines [01:34:22.280 --> 01:34:28.280] and then try to ask for bail, even though the judge wanted to release me on ROR [01:34:28.280 --> 01:34:32.280] because that's how it is in New York with bail right now. [01:34:32.280 --> 01:34:39.280] Okay, did you file criminally against the DA for lying to the judge? [01:34:39.280 --> 01:34:46.280] I did it, but the problem was that I wanted to get the transcripts back. [01:34:46.280 --> 01:34:48.280] I just got them back yesterday. [01:34:48.280 --> 01:34:53.280] So I have a confirmation that it is that particular person, the ADA, [01:34:53.280 --> 01:34:59.280] because he wouldn't give me his name on the record when I asked for it when I was at court. [01:34:59.280 --> 01:35:01.280] So I had no idea who he was. [01:35:01.280 --> 01:35:09.280] And there's no pictures of the ADAs in our county, so I couldn't go look them up. [01:35:09.280 --> 01:35:12.280] But you have found out who he is. [01:35:12.280 --> 01:35:15.280] I have the transcripts back. [01:35:15.280 --> 01:35:23.280] ADAs, these are in like municipal or justice of the peace courts. [01:35:23.280 --> 01:35:30.280] Any lawyer who practices in those courts is either a brand new lawyer [01:35:30.280 --> 01:35:35.280] or is not the sharpest knife in the drawer. [01:35:35.280 --> 01:35:37.280] Thus, if they were the sharpest knife in the drawer, [01:35:37.280 --> 01:35:44.280] they'd be out making the big bucks and still down here in these low-level courts grubbing for dollars. [01:35:44.280 --> 01:35:51.280] And a criminal complaint against him will sting him good. [01:35:51.280 --> 01:35:55.280] It may even get rid of him. [01:35:55.280 --> 01:35:58.280] Who is that in that criminal complaint, too? [01:35:58.280 --> 01:36:04.280] I've already been told by the county investigator for the DA's office, [01:36:04.280 --> 01:36:08.280] and he's already told me to refer cases to the attorney general. [01:36:08.280 --> 01:36:12.280] Should I just go ahead and take that to the attorney general for my criminal complaint? [01:36:12.280 --> 01:36:14.280] No, that's horse manure. [01:36:14.280 --> 01:36:18.280] I have to look at the attorney general in New York. [01:36:18.280 --> 01:36:24.280] I believe he has prosecutorial powers, but this is a crime. [01:36:24.280 --> 01:36:27.280] Crimes don't get reported to the attorney general. [01:36:27.280 --> 01:36:31.280] They get reported to some magistrate. [01:36:31.280 --> 01:36:33.280] The magistrate, okay. [01:36:33.280 --> 01:36:43.280] Have you read the criminal procedure code for New York? [01:36:43.280 --> 01:36:45.280] One more time, Rick. [01:36:45.280 --> 01:36:53.280] Have you read the criminal procedure code for New York? [01:36:53.280 --> 01:36:56.280] No, I haven't read it. Why? [01:36:56.280 --> 01:37:02.280] Okay, what I'd like you to do is take the phone and beat yourself around the eyes and ears with it. [01:37:02.280 --> 01:37:04.280] It knocks some sense into you. [01:37:04.280 --> 01:37:05.280] Read that code. [01:37:05.280 --> 01:37:07.280] There's not very much there. [01:37:07.280 --> 01:37:13.280] The codes are outlined, so there's lots of white space, so they look bigger than they are. [01:37:13.280 --> 01:37:19.280] When I look into the Texas criminal procedure code, [01:37:19.280 --> 01:37:28.280] the highest code I generally go up to is about 17 or 18, chapters 17 or 18, [01:37:28.280 --> 01:37:31.280] and these chapters are relatively short. [01:37:31.280 --> 01:37:33.280] Read them twice. [01:37:33.280 --> 01:37:42.280] There is a very specific procedure in there for handling criminal complaints. [01:37:42.280 --> 01:37:47.280] You need to read that procedure, and that will tell you where to go with these complaints. [01:37:47.280 --> 01:37:52.280] If you go to the police or these prosecutors or any of these public officials, [01:37:52.280 --> 01:37:55.280] they're going to feed you a line of crap over. [01:37:55.280 --> 01:37:59.280] They do not want you filing complaints against them and their buddies, [01:37:59.280 --> 01:38:03.280] so they're going to send you down rabbit holes. [01:38:03.280 --> 01:38:09.280] Here in Texas, they're going to tell you that you have to file a complaint with the police department [01:38:09.280 --> 01:38:12.280] or with the district attorney. [01:38:12.280 --> 01:38:15.280] No, you don't. [01:38:15.280 --> 01:38:20.280] There's nothing in law that directs a complaint to either one of those. [01:38:20.280 --> 01:38:25.280] Everything directs a complaint to some magistrate. [01:38:25.280 --> 01:38:29.280] California, I guarantee you California. [01:38:29.280 --> 01:38:32.280] New York will be the same way. [01:38:32.280 --> 01:38:36.280] Magistrates hear complaints. [01:38:36.280 --> 01:38:38.280] Go ahead. [01:38:38.280 --> 01:38:40.280] How would I pick the magistrates out? [01:38:40.280 --> 01:38:44.280] And you're saying that in the procedural code, [01:38:44.280 --> 01:38:47.280] it will tell me which magistrate I should go to? [01:38:47.280 --> 01:38:58.280] No, all of the states, magistrates can accept complaints from anywhere in the state. [01:38:58.280 --> 01:39:01.280] Things are set up that way. [01:39:01.280 --> 01:39:06.280] That's why you have JPs spread around the county. [01:39:06.280 --> 01:39:10.280] That's so if a person's arrested anywhere in the state, [01:39:10.280 --> 01:39:14.280] they're within a day's horseback ride from a magistrate. [01:39:14.280 --> 01:39:17.280] So it doesn't make any difference what they're charged with. [01:39:17.280 --> 01:39:20.280] The magistrate can hear it. [01:39:20.280 --> 01:39:28.280] So any magistrate, and I like to file them with the Chief Justice of the Supreme. [01:39:28.280 --> 01:39:31.280] That gets their attention. [01:39:31.280 --> 01:39:35.280] Their magistrates, I'll be filing criminal charges against the Chief Justice [01:39:35.280 --> 01:39:42.280] for not acting on the criminal complaint against the governor I sent to him. [01:39:42.280 --> 01:39:44.280] Magistrates, have a duty. [01:39:44.280 --> 01:39:49.280] When you send... [01:39:49.280 --> 01:39:53.280] Hello. [01:39:53.280 --> 01:39:54.280] Randy. [01:39:54.280 --> 01:39:56.280] My Skype is fading out. [01:39:56.280 --> 01:39:58.280] You cut out. [01:39:58.280 --> 01:40:01.280] Yeah, you cut out, yep. [01:40:01.280 --> 01:40:03.280] Okay. [01:40:03.280 --> 01:40:06.280] I'm thinking I might be picking up background noise. [01:40:06.280 --> 01:40:09.280] I hear a truck in the background. [01:40:09.280 --> 01:40:12.280] Our system has a suppressor on it. [01:40:12.280 --> 01:40:18.280] So if I'm speaking and you try to speak, it will push your voice below mine. [01:40:18.280 --> 01:40:21.280] So I get this loud noise in the background. [01:40:21.280 --> 01:40:23.280] It may be drowning out my voice. [01:40:23.280 --> 01:40:25.280] So I apologize for that. [01:40:25.280 --> 01:40:31.280] It's a new mic and a new system, and I still have the bugs worked out of it yet. [01:40:31.280 --> 01:40:35.280] So any magistrate can take your complaint. [01:40:35.280 --> 01:40:37.280] It doesn't matter how high or low they are. [01:40:37.280 --> 01:40:38.280] Well, they're not going to want to. [01:40:38.280 --> 01:40:43.280] They're going to want to send you to the sheriff or to the DA. [01:40:43.280 --> 01:40:50.280] And when they do that, I file criminal charges against them for not taking the complaint. [01:40:50.280 --> 01:40:53.280] Did you hear the beginning of the show? [01:40:53.280 --> 01:40:56.280] I missed the first five minutes. [01:40:56.280 --> 01:41:01.280] I was just hearing you talk about like the end part of that. [01:41:01.280 --> 01:41:03.280] That's exactly what I was doing. [01:41:03.280 --> 01:41:11.280] I was setting up the chief of police to take a complaint against his one of his officers for doing what he told him to. [01:41:11.280 --> 01:41:13.280] And he didn't want to take it. [01:41:13.280 --> 01:41:14.280] Who cares? [01:41:14.280 --> 01:41:16.280] You don't take it. [01:41:16.280 --> 01:41:20.280] I'll file criminal charges against you for not taking it. [01:41:20.280 --> 01:41:32.280] And then you file it with the magistrate and the magistrate when he doesn't act on it, then you file against the magistrate and you get everybody mad at the person you start out with. [01:41:32.280 --> 01:41:35.280] It's all politics at the end of the day. [01:41:35.280 --> 01:41:40.280] None of these guys are going to do what you want them to or what you ask them to. [01:41:40.280 --> 01:41:42.280] They've got this rule. [01:41:42.280 --> 01:41:47.280] Never ask a public official to do anything you actually want them to do. [01:41:47.280 --> 01:41:52.280] You want them not to do it so you can file on them. [01:41:52.280 --> 01:41:56.280] And then the guy he was trying to protect gets him in trouble. [01:41:56.280 --> 01:42:04.280] And then when the next one doesn't act on your complaint against the magistrate, you file against him. [01:42:04.280 --> 01:42:10.280] And he gets mad at the magistrate and the guy below him, the guy at the bottom, is the one that gets hammered. [01:42:10.280 --> 01:42:15.280] If he's some chump ADA, he's likely to be toast. [01:42:15.280 --> 01:42:19.280] They're going to send him packing. [01:42:19.280 --> 01:42:22.280] Does that make sense? [01:42:22.280 --> 01:42:26.280] It does. Can I have one more question with you? [01:42:26.280 --> 01:42:31.280] We've only got one minute and a half left. [01:42:31.280 --> 01:42:40.280] Why wouldn't I start trying to send this to the DA and then have him not do anything and then eventually send everybody to a magistrate? [01:42:40.280 --> 01:42:47.280] That way I get the ADA and magistrate locally and then to the Supreme Court. [01:42:47.280 --> 01:42:49.280] Yeah, get them all. [01:42:49.280 --> 01:42:53.280] That's the routine. That's what we do. [01:42:53.280 --> 01:42:55.280] I sent criminal complaints. [01:42:55.280 --> 01:43:06.280] I filed criminal complaints against the Travis County District Attorney because he exercised prosecutorial discretion. [01:43:06.280 --> 01:43:08.280] And I say he doesn't have any power to do that. [01:43:08.280 --> 01:43:13.280] So I filed criminal charges with all the district judges in Travis County and they didn't do it. [01:43:13.280 --> 01:43:14.280] They didn't issue a warrant. [01:43:14.280 --> 01:43:19.280] So now I'm going to file criminal charges against all of them with the Court of Appeals. [01:43:19.280 --> 01:43:21.280] You don't want to do your job, Bubba. [01:43:21.280 --> 01:43:24.280] Let's see how that works out for you. [01:43:24.280 --> 01:43:27.280] This is how you'll change things. [01:43:27.280 --> 01:43:32.280] One complaint at a time. [01:43:32.280 --> 01:43:33.280] OK, thank you, Chris. [01:43:33.280 --> 01:43:36.280] We're about to go to our sponsors. [01:43:36.280 --> 01:43:41.280] This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio. [01:43:41.280 --> 01:43:45.280] Remember, we had a full board all night. [01:43:45.280 --> 01:43:47.280] So hang on. [01:43:47.280 --> 01:43:50.280] We're going to pick up E.J. on the other side. [01:43:50.280 --> 01:44:00.280] We'll be right back. [01:44:00.280 --> 01:44:01.280] Dang, Cookie. [01:44:01.280 --> 01:44:03.280] Cookie? Me love cookies. [01:44:03.280 --> 01:44:06.280] Oh, hi, Cookie Muncher. No, these are yucky cookies. [01:44:06.280 --> 01:44:09.280] Cookies? Yucky? No, no bad cookies. [01:44:09.280 --> 01:44:12.280] You can't even eat these cookies. These are cyber cookies. [01:44:12.280 --> 01:44:13.280] No candy? [01:44:13.280 --> 01:44:16.280] No, they are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer. [01:44:16.280 --> 01:44:17.280] These have apples. [01:44:17.280 --> 01:44:20.280] Really? Oh, that's an actual apple. [01:44:20.280 --> 01:44:23.280] Yummy apple. [01:44:23.280 --> 01:44:26.280] I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash. [01:44:26.280 --> 01:44:32.280] I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them. [01:44:32.280 --> 01:44:34.280] Bye bye, yucky cookies. [01:44:34.280 --> 01:44:40.280] Now I go to logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side, [01:44:40.280 --> 01:44:47.280] bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies. [01:44:47.280 --> 01:44:49.280] New cookies? For me? [01:44:49.280 --> 01:44:51.280] Consider it an early Christmas present. [01:44:51.280 --> 01:44:57.280] And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network, too. [01:44:57.280 --> 01:44:58.280] C is for Cookie. [01:44:58.280 --> 01:45:00.280] C is for classified. [01:45:00.280 --> 01:45:04.280] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.280 --> 01:45:08.280] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, [01:45:08.280 --> 01:45:15.280] easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:15.280 --> 01:45:19.280] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.280 --> 01:45:23.280] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.280 --> 01:45:28.280] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too. [01:45:28.280 --> 01:45:34.280] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.280 --> 01:45:39.280] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:39.280 --> 01:45:43.280] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.280 --> 01:45:49.280] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:49.280 --> 01:46:01.280] pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:19.280 --> 01:46:35.280] Okay, we are back. Randy Helton, Brett Felton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to E.J. in California. [01:46:35.280 --> 01:46:44.280] Hello, E.J. What do you have for us today? [01:46:44.280 --> 01:46:50.280] Hello, E.J. Well, looks like we may have lost E.J. [01:46:50.280 --> 01:46:56.280] E.J., I would tell you to hang up and call back to get a better connection, but we've only got one segment left. [01:46:56.280 --> 01:47:02.280] It looks like we've lost you, and I apologize for taking so long to get to you. [01:47:02.280 --> 01:47:11.280] Okay, now we're going to go to Hussey, and I'm not sure if this may be a first-time caller. [01:47:11.280 --> 01:47:15.280] If you're in the 972 area code. [01:47:15.280 --> 01:47:16.280] Yes. [01:47:16.280 --> 01:47:19.280] Are you a first-time caller? [01:47:19.280 --> 01:47:21.280] Yes, sir, I am. [01:47:21.280 --> 01:47:30.280] Okay, then I will put you in the database. This is Hussey underscore Lola. What should we call you? [01:47:30.280 --> 01:47:32.280] Lola. [01:47:32.280 --> 01:47:37.280] Lola, okay. What do you have for us today? [01:47:37.280 --> 01:47:46.280] It's pretty simple to end the call today. I purchased your e-book this morning, and I'm just trying to figure out how to get to it. [01:47:46.280 --> 01:47:50.280] I don't have a link or anything to open you up with. [01:47:50.280 --> 01:47:54.280] Okay, Deborah is out of town. Her father is in- [01:47:54.280 --> 01:47:56.280] Okay, so he comes from your office. [01:47:56.280 --> 01:48:04.280] Deborah is the producer, and her father is in real ill health, so she's went to see her father in East Texas. [01:48:04.280 --> 01:48:17.280] Not a problem at all. That was an easy answer. I just needed to know if maybe I got lost in the worldwide web and just needed to touch base with somebody. [01:48:17.280 --> 01:48:28.280] Jane Lynch has been so awesome, and trust no one has been helping me, and I figured, well, I'll just call in, rule of law, and see if I can talk to Randy myself. [01:48:28.280 --> 01:48:32.280] So ignore the rest, and I'll just wait to hear from Deborah, okay? [01:48:32.280 --> 01:48:41.280] Wait a minute. You're online. Everybody's listening, so ask us something insightful and exciting. [01:48:41.280 --> 01:48:52.280] Okay, I'm going to ask you something insightful. My big goal here right now is tackling my property taxes. That is the honest truth. [01:48:52.280 --> 01:49:02.280] I am just trying to get all my ammunition. I've done the Juris Dictionary course with Dr. Gray, which was fantastic. [01:49:02.280 --> 01:49:10.280] I'm studying with along your group, Alphonse's group, the Big Sib channel. [01:49:10.280 --> 01:49:19.280] I'm in all of those that are just enlightening me to this new process, but I own my home outright. I know something's wrong. [01:49:19.280 --> 01:49:31.280] I know that this whole property tax thing is a dead-gun scandal, and I'm just sick and tired of being taken advantage of, and I'm just gathering all my debts in a row. [01:49:31.280 --> 01:49:43.280] This is the absolute first time in my entire life that I did not pay my property taxes. I'm a crew in interest. I understand that, and they're probably going to come after me, [01:49:43.280 --> 01:49:50.280] but I know it's not theirs to be had, so I'm just going to keep an eye out for the end. [01:49:50.280 --> 01:50:07.280] The first thing I suggest you do is write a letter to the tax assessor collector, and ask the tax assessor collector if the state of Texas has a claim against your property. [01:50:07.280 --> 01:50:13.280] You could expect a letter back from them saying, no, they do not have a claim against your property. [01:50:13.280 --> 01:50:26.280] When you get that letter back, then you send them a letter telling them to remove your property from the public tax rolls to the private rolls. [01:50:26.280 --> 01:50:29.280] That should stop your taxes. [01:50:29.280 --> 01:50:38.280] Even if I have a homestead exemption on my property, I went down to the county assessor's office last week on Thursday, a week ago, [01:50:38.280 --> 01:50:44.280] and asked them for the form to fill out to get that exemption removed. [01:50:44.280 --> 01:50:49.280] Now, I haven't done it yet because I'm still trying to figure out, is that what I need to do? [01:50:49.280 --> 01:50:58.280] No. Homesteading doesn't make any difference from this perspective. [01:50:58.280 --> 01:51:06.280] Titles, the title for your property is what they use to assess taxes against you with. [01:51:06.280 --> 01:51:18.280] When the state was young, it was bringing people to Texas, and they sold them property, but most people didn't have enough money to pay for the whole property. [01:51:18.280 --> 01:51:28.280] So they let them pay it out over time, and the state took out a title on the property. [01:51:28.280 --> 01:51:32.280] In fact, that was lean. [01:51:32.280 --> 01:51:40.280] And as long as you were paying this off, the state could tax your property. [01:51:40.280 --> 01:51:44.280] I guess it encouraged people to pay them off quicker. [01:51:44.280 --> 01:51:54.280] But what it didn't tell people is once you pay the property off, you can have your property removed from the public rolls, put on the private rolls, [01:51:54.280 --> 01:52:01.280] and then that title doesn't apply anymore. [01:52:01.280 --> 01:52:05.280] They don't tax private property. [01:52:05.280 --> 01:52:10.280] Now, this is the first time that I've actually, I'm sorry, go ahead. [01:52:10.280 --> 01:52:16.280] If you want to fight this issue, that's the first issue I would look at. [01:52:16.280 --> 01:52:27.280] If you get into, they're taxing me too much, they don't have a right to tax my property, blah, blah, blah, you're going to get into litigation forever. [01:52:27.280 --> 01:52:34.280] Look into the original methods by which property was transferred to individuals. [01:52:34.280 --> 01:52:38.280] You'll hear people talking about alloidal titles. [01:52:38.280 --> 01:52:43.280] Alloidal title, correct, feudal versus alloidal, and this is alloidal. [01:52:43.280 --> 01:52:44.280] Yes. [01:52:44.280 --> 01:52:49.280] So the original title was alloidal. [01:52:49.280 --> 01:52:55.280] They were generally parts of land grants and such. [01:52:55.280 --> 01:53:11.280] And everybody took out titles so that, or had a title registered with the clerk so that the clerk would maintain a history on the property. [01:53:11.280 --> 01:53:15.280] Well, you don't need that. [01:53:15.280 --> 01:53:23.280] So you have them, you can have your property removed from the county court records. [01:53:23.280 --> 01:53:30.280] And first you get it moved from the public tax rolls to the private. [01:53:30.280 --> 01:53:37.280] And I'm not the one who's very knowledgeable in this area. [01:53:37.280 --> 01:53:42.280] This would take some specific research on private tax rolls. [01:53:42.280 --> 01:53:50.280] I suggest you do some digging on what the private tax rolls amount to. [01:53:50.280 --> 01:53:57.280] Because I've had a number of people claim that their property was removed from the tax rolls by this method. [01:53:57.280 --> 01:54:00.280] And it is surprisingly simple. [01:54:00.280 --> 01:54:01.280] Okay. [01:54:01.280 --> 01:54:02.280] Okay. [01:54:02.280 --> 01:54:10.280] So the very first thing I need to do is check to see if the county has a claim against my property? [01:54:10.280 --> 01:54:11.280] Yes. [01:54:11.280 --> 01:54:14.280] Just to send them a letter and ask them if they have a claim. [01:54:14.280 --> 01:54:24.280] And they'll run a check and as long as your taxes aren't delinquent to the point that they filed a lien, then they won't have a claim against your property. [01:54:24.280 --> 01:54:28.280] No, they're only delinquent as of January 31st. [01:54:28.280 --> 01:54:30.280] Well, they become delinquent February 1st. [01:54:30.280 --> 01:54:32.280] And I did not take them. [01:54:32.280 --> 01:54:33.280] You're okay. [01:54:33.280 --> 01:54:38.280] You're okay until they file a lien and that will take probably a year or two. [01:54:38.280 --> 01:54:45.280] So just file it and ask them to remove them from the property, remove them from the public tax rolls. [01:54:45.280 --> 01:54:46.280] Okay. [01:54:46.280 --> 01:54:47.280] All right. [01:54:47.280 --> 01:54:52.280] And the claim is through the county tax assessor's office? [01:54:52.280 --> 01:54:54.280] Yes, the county tax assessor's office. [01:54:54.280 --> 01:55:04.280] Well, the county depends on how they do their county tax assessor, collector generally or the county auditor, whoever does the tax collection. [01:55:04.280 --> 01:55:05.280] Okay. [01:55:05.280 --> 01:55:16.280] So it's the tax collector that takes the money, but it's the appraiser who gets it certified and on the tax roll. [01:55:16.280 --> 01:55:21.280] No, the appraiser just appraises the value of the property. [01:55:21.280 --> 01:55:26.280] Whoever filed the title with the state got it on the tax rolls. [01:55:26.280 --> 01:55:35.280] Yes, and that was the owner of the, before he sold, built this house on this land and then sold it. [01:55:35.280 --> 01:55:45.280] Well, yeah, whoever, the land that he had, that the builder had almost certainly had a title on it. [01:55:45.280 --> 01:55:52.280] Otherwise, he couldn't sell the property because he couldn't get a title search. [01:55:52.280 --> 01:56:02.280] If you have that title removed from your property, it's really hard to sell it because you don't know what claims are against. [01:56:02.280 --> 01:56:13.280] You know, if I go to buy your property, it doesn't have a title on it, then the clerk has not kept an official record of all claims against the property. [01:56:13.280 --> 01:56:28.280] So if you're in a property that you intend to sell at some point, you might not want to do this because it would be extremely difficult to sell it. [01:56:28.280 --> 01:56:34.280] Well, there may not be any claims or liens against it, but a person has no way of telling that. [01:56:34.280 --> 01:56:48.280] This thing of filing titles with a central location began with the settlers at Plymouth in 1645 or somewhere around there. [01:56:48.280 --> 01:56:55.280] One of the first things they did was set this up so that there would not be land disputes. [01:56:55.280 --> 01:57:09.280] This has been, you know, everybody does it everywhere in the world. They do this. If you remove that title, then the clerk no longer keeps these records for you. [01:57:09.280 --> 01:57:21.280] That's one of the things your taxes pay for. So if you have a property you don't ever intend to sell, not a problem. [01:57:21.280 --> 01:57:28.280] But if you bought a property that you intend to live in for a while and accrue equity in so you can sell it [01:57:28.280 --> 01:57:36.280] and possibly move to a better house or even a smaller house as we get older, sometimes the size down, [01:57:36.280 --> 01:57:46.280] if you have removed yourself from the tax rolls and removed the title, you can't sell the house. [01:57:46.280 --> 01:57:51.280] So that's going to keep you in the system. [01:57:51.280 --> 01:57:56.280] You can't get title insurance on that. [01:57:56.280 --> 01:58:11.280] It can create other problems. So you have to kind of wait. If you're in 9772 area code, your property's values are going to shoot straight up for the next five years. [01:58:11.280 --> 01:58:23.280] It is absolutely the best investment you have. If you remove it from the court's records, then all that value goes away. [01:58:23.280 --> 01:58:29.280] Okay. We better leave it alone and just pay it and be done with it. Sounds like what you're telling me. [01:58:29.280 --> 01:58:35.280] You know, I fight these guys, but I pick my fights real carefully. [01:58:35.280 --> 01:58:42.280] Okay. Thank you for calling. We are out of time. [01:58:42.280 --> 01:58:50.280] You will be back tomorrow night at 8 o'clock. Thank you for listening and good night. [01:58:50.280 --> 01:58:57.280] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:57.280 --> 01:59:03.280] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, [01:59:03.280 --> 01:59:08.280] verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.280 --> 01:59:20.280] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.280 --> 01:59:30.280] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.280 --> 01:59:41.280] This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.280 --> 01:59:52.280] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:52.280 --> 02:00:00.280] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com