[00:00.000 --> 00:04.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:04.000 --> 00:08.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:08.000 --> 00:09.000] Our liberty depends on it. [00:09.000 --> 00:15.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember your First Amendment rights. [00:15.000 --> 00:17.000] Privacy is under attack. [00:17.000 --> 00:20.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:20.000 --> 00:25.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:25.000 --> 00:30.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:30.000 --> 00:33.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [00:33.000 --> 00:40.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:40.000 --> 00:44.000] Start over with Startpage. [00:44.000 --> 00:46.000] Spar, it's what fighters do. [00:46.000 --> 00:49.000] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:49.000 --> 00:52.000] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:52.000 --> 01:01.000] Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion. [01:01.000 --> 01:06.000] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, assembly, and religion. [01:06.000 --> 01:09.000] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:09.000 --> 01:13.000] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:13.000 --> 01:19.000] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:19.000 --> 01:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:30.000 --> 01:36.000] Pressure. We usually associate it with stress and negativity, but sometimes a bit of pressure can be healing. [01:36.000 --> 01:44.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you how conditions like nausea can be cured using the traditional Chinese therapy known as acupressure. [01:44.000 --> 01:46.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:46.000 --> 01:50.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:50.000 --> 01:55.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:55.000 --> 02:00.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:00.000 --> 02:02.000] Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. [02:02.000 --> 02:10.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:10.000 --> 02:14.000] Start over with StartPage. [02:14.000 --> 02:20.000] Acupressure is an ancient practice that uses finger or hand pressure to cure everything from headaches to constipation. [02:20.000 --> 02:26.000] The pressure is applied to points known as meridians that are believed to control the flow of energy in the human body. [02:26.000 --> 02:33.000] Acupressure offers a simple cure for nausea you might try the next time you get a queasy stomach or a case of motion sickness. [02:33.000 --> 02:36.000] Simply apply moderate pressure to the point known as P6. [02:36.000 --> 02:41.000] You'll find it on the inside of your wrist, about two fingers' width down from your palm. [02:41.000 --> 02:47.000] Placing pressure on the P6 point works on the same principle as those pricey anti-nausea wristbands. [02:47.000 --> 02:50.000] But this relief is free and always on hand. [02:50.000 --> 02:56.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:02.000 --> 03:05.000] This is what happens when you call the cops. Say what? [03:05.000 --> 03:07.000] This is what happens when you call the cops. Come on! [03:07.000 --> 03:12.000] This is what happens when you call the cops. You get your rights violated or you all get shot. [03:12.000 --> 03:17.000] This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops. [03:17.000 --> 03:22.000] This is what happens when you call the cops. You get your rights violated or you all get shot. [03:22.000 --> 03:27.000] I'm sick of people being victimized by criminal cops. Psychopathic predators terrorize the neighborhood blocks. [03:27.000 --> 03:32.000] Equipped with pepper spray, made cups, tasers, and glocks. They like serial killers acting out subliminal thoughts. [03:32.000 --> 03:38.000] Forget what you talk. These cops have got a license to kill. Witness intimidation means that they can use it at will. [03:38.000 --> 03:44.000] Code of silence means that the pigs will never let out a squeal. And if they go to court, they know the judge will make them a deal for real. [03:44.000 --> 03:46.000] That's why they stoppin' me, lockin' me up, and stoppin' me. [03:46.000 --> 03:51.000] Complicating my poverty, darkening my demography. Making the poor commodities, profiting off of poverty. [03:51.000 --> 03:54.000] Enforcement of policy, supporting prison economies, yeah. [03:54.000 --> 03:58.000] No one makes money when the violence stops. Hating brutality is the way to make a criminal crock. [03:58.000 --> 04:04.000] Blood in the gut is how to wish whether they breath at the top. And that's why this is what happens when you call the cops. [04:04.000 --> 04:07.000] This is what happens when you call the cops. [04:07.000 --> 04:11.000] Alright folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig. [04:11.000 --> 04:16.000] I am so sorry for our beginning of the show technical difficulties here tonight, but we are live. [04:16.000 --> 04:24.000] It is February 14th, 2022. Happy Valentine's Day to everyone, if you care for that sort of thing. [04:24.000 --> 04:30.000] That said, I hope this goes right since we're right on top of another break here. [04:30.000 --> 04:37.000] Okay, I'm still trying to get things arranged because not everything is up the way I need it for showtime. [04:37.000 --> 04:44.000] So y'all please bear with me here for just a second as I work on some of this and try to get us back into works here. [04:44.000 --> 04:57.000] Let's see. Alright, there we go. Now I'm finally getting where I can get into the collarboard and see who's out there and all that stuff. [04:57.000 --> 05:09.000] Alright, well now we'll go ahead and do the first break here as soon as it comes up so I can make sure I've got everything else ready. [05:09.000 --> 05:18.000] Alright, my collarboard is up. The collarboard is on. [05:18.000 --> 05:23.000] If this thing will stop asking me to log into it every time I click a button. [05:23.000 --> 05:32.000] Okay, 512-646-1984 is the calling number. If y'all want to call and get in line, the collarboard is open. [05:32.000 --> 05:37.000] I don't have a monologue for tonight. I spent the entire day working on the new seminar book. [05:37.000 --> 05:43.000] So everything running through my head right now has to do with what's going on in the book. [05:43.000 --> 05:48.000] And I did not have time to sit down and think of a monologue for this evening. [05:48.000 --> 05:54.000] So if you want to call in and get started with callers right away, I am open to that and so is the caller line. [05:54.000 --> 06:03.000] Oh, that said, I hope everybody is having a good Monday or had a good Monday and that the rest of the week goes well as well. [06:03.000 --> 06:10.000] But I don't know. It's been a very hectic day for me, folks, so I don't know how it's been for the rest of you. [06:10.000 --> 06:18.000] Now, just FYI, the chapter I've been working on in the book for the past couple or three days, [06:18.000 --> 06:24.000] and I'm working on several chapters simultaneously, but this is one where the greatest amount of my focus has been for the last couple days, [06:24.000 --> 06:30.000] is dealing with the legitimate legal authority to enforce the transportation code. [06:30.000 --> 06:35.000] Right now, this chapter is up to 30 some odd pages. [06:35.000 --> 06:45.000] And I am really getting into the details and the specifics of who's got the authority, how they get it, and everything else. [06:45.000 --> 06:53.000] I have not gotten to any of the provisions within the administrative code itself as of yet. [06:53.000 --> 07:02.000] So far, we're dealing entirely with what the transportation code and the government code say upon the subject of who has enforcement powers. [07:02.000 --> 07:12.000] Now, there is something of great interest in Chapter 311 and 312 of the government code in relation to the transportation code [07:12.000 --> 07:21.000] and the transportation code's use of certain terms, those terms being state and United States. [07:21.000 --> 07:38.000] Okay? Because when you read those, you find out very, very quickly that the statutes are not discussing being operative within the boundaries of Texas. [07:38.000 --> 07:40.000] Okay? [07:40.000 --> 07:52.000] I know that sounds odd, but when you read the definitions, it's the only conclusion that makes any sense based upon what the definitions themselves actually tell us. [07:52.000 --> 08:03.000] Everything about the transportation code points directly at the federal Title 49 Commercial Care Safety Act program. [08:03.000 --> 08:08.000] Everything, including the definition of state and United States. [08:08.000 --> 08:19.000] Now, once you understand that and you start going through the statutes and you see the use of the term state throughout the transportation code, [08:19.000 --> 08:34.000] and you quickly realize that at no time does the term state ever get defined as being the several states of the union or the state of Texas, that it starts to click. [08:34.000 --> 08:36.000] Okay? [08:36.000 --> 08:43.000] Like I say, I will go into that in great detail when we do complete the book. [08:43.000 --> 08:50.000] Right now I've got Charles in Georgia up on the board, but I've got less than a minute before we take a break, so Charles, please hang on. [08:50.000 --> 08:54.000] I will get to you as soon as we get back from the break. [08:54.000 --> 08:59.000] But you're going to find this chapter very, very interesting reading. [08:59.000 --> 09:14.000] It's probably going to be one of the longer chapters in the book because there are multiple codes we have to link together to show who has the authority, how they got it, [09:14.000 --> 09:31.000] and what authority is actually redelegated to political subdivisions, how it's delegated, and specifically which political subdivisions and officers are able to get it. [09:31.000 --> 09:43.000] Because the other thing transportation code definitions tell us is that by default the only officers that have it are the officers of the Department of Public Safety. [09:43.000 --> 09:44.000] Okay? [09:44.000 --> 09:47.000] So this is going to be a really interesting, detailed chapter. [09:47.000 --> 09:49.000] In the meantime, we're going to take a break. [09:49.000 --> 09:51.000] 512-646-1984. [09:51.000 --> 09:52.000] Give us a call. [09:52.000 --> 09:53.000] Get in line. [09:53.000 --> 09:55.000] Let's talk. [09:55.000 --> 10:00.000] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His Word? [10:00.000 --> 10:11.000] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [10:11.000 --> 10:18.000] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. [10:18.000 --> 10:25.000] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [10:25.000 --> 10:32.000] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. [10:32.000 --> 10:37.000] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [10:37.000 --> 10:44.000] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [10:44.000 --> 10:54.000] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [10:54.000 --> 10:59.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [10:59.000 --> 11:03.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [11:03.000 --> 11:08.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. [11:08.000 --> 11:14.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, [11:14.000 --> 11:20.000] what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, [11:20.000 --> 11:27.000] how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [11:27.000 --> 11:35.000] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. [11:35.000 --> 11:43.000] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com. [11:43.000 --> 11:54.000] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-n at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [11:54.000 --> 12:05.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com. [12:05.000 --> 12:22.000] Yeah, there's a storm on the loose, sirens in my head. Crabbed up inside, I'm thought to have been dead. Can I be cold? My whole life spins into a present. [12:22.000 --> 12:36.000] How am I living through the twilight in the home? Living in the madhouse, feeling like being cold? My feet come down, come on down to the moon and star. [12:36.000 --> 12:45.000] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig, calling number 512-646-1984. [12:45.000 --> 12:51.000] All right, first up on the board is Charles in Georgia. Charles, what can we do for you? [12:51.000 --> 12:53.000] What are you doing today? Can you hear me pretty good, Eddie? [12:53.000 --> 12:55.000] Yeah, I can hear you fine. What's up, man? [12:55.000 --> 13:06.000] Good, good. Hey, listen, I called last week, man, and I wanted to bring awareness, something that's happening out here in the streets. [13:06.000 --> 13:19.000] There's been a civil asset forfeiture, and I know it's a little bit redundant. I already brought it up last week, but I just wanted to bring it up again just for people who might not have caught it last week. [13:19.000 --> 13:32.000] You know, you've got a couple of situations over in California about, one, where a sheriff authorized his deputies to basically commandeer a Brinks truck. [13:32.000 --> 13:45.000] No, no, no. Let's tell it straight. To perpetrate armed robbery of a Brinks truck under cover of law using the police power as a disguise for their criminality. [13:45.000 --> 13:47.000] That's what we're talking about. [13:47.000 --> 13:53.000] Okay. All right. Your description is a lot better than mine. [13:53.000 --> 14:12.000] And not only do they do that, but then they play hot potato and take the money and then hurry up and give it to the feds, so that way when people come after them, they can say, hey, we don't have it, we gave it to the feds. [14:12.000 --> 14:23.000] And then the feds in turn give the sheriff 80% of what they stole in that civil asset forfeiture. [14:23.000 --> 14:32.000] And the law enforcement agencies get to claim that they don't have any money taken directly from the individual. Any money they got came from the federal government. [14:32.000 --> 14:46.000] Yes. And so that's something that the listeners, you're out there, you know, you need to be aware of that these people can stop you and if you have any amount of money on you, they can take your money. [14:46.000 --> 15:01.000] If they can take it from a Brinks truck, from a legal operation, a legal business that was given a life by the state of California knowingly, then they can take any amount of money and anything you got legally [15:01.000 --> 15:07.000] and hand it to the feds and have it given back at a tune of 80%. [15:07.000 --> 15:36.000] Well, I'll say this. The moment that any member of any legislature anywhere submitted a bill containing the laws that comprise civil asset forfeiture, anybody signing on to or voting positively for that bill should have been hung from the spire of the Capitol building in every state and in Washington, D.C., for treason. [15:36.000 --> 15:49.000] Okay? At the very least, sedition. Because there's no question in any reasonable person's mind civil asset forfeiture is as unconstitutional an idea as has ever existed. [15:49.000 --> 15:58.000] The only people that think it's okay are those in government and the courts that get paid to look the other way to keep their job. [15:58.000 --> 16:06.000] Because let's face facts. Judges do not have lifetime tenure like they want us to think they do. [16:06.000 --> 16:15.000] They only have tenure for as long as they are operating with good behavior. [16:15.000 --> 16:31.000] When a judge violates the Constitution by ruling in a manner that is clearly anti-Constitution, that judge is no longer serving in good behavior. [16:31.000 --> 16:35.000] That judge should have been impeached and removed. [16:35.000 --> 16:49.000] That didn't happen. Why? Because the people that he protected by agreeing that laws like this were valid are the only ones that can start the ball rolling to remove them. [16:49.000 --> 16:57.000] So it's a catch-22 built into the system to put a stop to this kind of stuff. [16:57.000 --> 17:08.000] I'm going to bang this drum as much as I can, especially if I'm able to just call in and everything. [17:08.000 --> 17:22.000] There was another situation that also happened up in California where the feds went to a business that was actually I assume they were dealing in some kind of illegal business. [17:22.000 --> 17:32.000] But they had these safe deposit boxes. And these safe deposit boxes belonged to people who weren't participating in any crime. [17:32.000 --> 17:45.000] Right. And the warrant they obtained to raid the business specifically prohibited them from taking anything within or the block boxes themselves. [17:45.000 --> 17:46.000] Yes. [17:46.000 --> 17:49.000] And yet the FBI did it anyway. [17:49.000 --> 18:01.000] They did it anyway. They opened the contents of the boxes, which the judge specifically said not to do from what I read. [18:01.000 --> 18:08.000] They did it anyway. They went back and made up an excuse where we need to inventory what's in the boxes. [18:08.000 --> 18:12.000] They did not need to inventory what was in the boxes. [18:12.000 --> 18:16.000] No, because they weren't allowed to have them in the first place. [18:16.000 --> 18:23.000] So somehow they either got permission or they just inventory the boxes. [18:23.000 --> 18:29.000] And then what they did was they played the waiting game to see who was going to come and claim the boxes. [18:29.000 --> 18:32.000] There is nothing constitutional. [18:32.000 --> 18:39.000] There is nothing lawful about that act by our beloved federal bureau of the investigation. [18:39.000 --> 18:41.000] There's nothing constitutional. [18:41.000 --> 18:43.000] There's nothing funny about these people. [18:43.000 --> 18:48.000] There's nothing sophisticated about these people. [18:48.000 --> 18:56.000] About any level of government, there's nothing that we should be looking up to these people and thanking them for, in my opinion. [18:56.000 --> 18:58.000] I think these people all should. [18:58.000 --> 19:00.000] No, there should not. [19:00.000 --> 19:05.000] Okay, let's look at a reasonable construction of the Constitution. [19:05.000 --> 19:11.000] None of the federal agencies that exist are authorized. [19:11.000 --> 19:13.000] Okay, none of them. [19:13.000 --> 19:20.000] None of the alphabet agencies that exist in Washington, D.C. are authorized for Congress to create by the Constitution. [19:20.000 --> 19:22.000] None of them. [19:22.000 --> 19:33.000] Only those entities that are necessary and ancillary to the 18 enumerated powers given to Congress are authorized to be created. [19:33.000 --> 19:36.000] And none of these entities fulfill that task. [19:36.000 --> 19:38.000] None of them. [19:38.000 --> 19:40.000] There is no legitimate Department of Education. [19:40.000 --> 19:42.000] There is no legitimate FBI. [19:42.000 --> 19:45.000] There is no legitimate CIA. [19:45.000 --> 19:49.000] There's no legitimate anything in that regard. [19:49.000 --> 19:55.000] Because none of that is something authorized by the Constitution for Congress to do. [19:55.000 --> 20:04.000] Much less to allow them to take any acts and actions within the states themselves. [20:04.000 --> 20:10.000] Of course, the state actors could do something about it if they wanted to. [20:10.000 --> 20:22.000] Because the federal government would have to literally come in with an army to take back a federal employee if the state itself refused to return them and prosecuted them for criminal conduct. [20:22.000 --> 20:26.000] And threw them into a state prison instead of a federal prison. [20:26.000 --> 20:33.000] The federal government would literally have to send in the army to get them back. [20:33.000 --> 20:35.000] Because it's the only way they could get them back. [20:35.000 --> 20:40.000] But then everyone who voted to do that would be guilty of waging war against the states. [20:40.000 --> 20:44.000] Which they cannot do. [20:44.000 --> 20:51.000] But our states are being bought off by federal funding to allow this kind of thing to happen. [20:51.000 --> 20:58.000] That in fact is the very section of the legal authority book chapter that I was working on before I got on the show tonight. [20:58.000 --> 21:06.000] Was dealing with how the states were bribed through promises of federal funding of various kinds. [21:06.000 --> 21:12.000] To allow the federal government to reach within the state in ways they were never constitutionally authorized to do. [21:12.000 --> 21:17.000] By getting the state to do the fed's dirty work for them. [21:17.000 --> 21:20.000] And take money for it in exchange. [21:20.000 --> 21:32.000] Thus, every state of the union has been betrayed and sold out by the very people we elected to protect our rights and to keep the federal government in check with the change of the constitution. [21:32.000 --> 21:34.000] None of them are doing it. [21:34.000 --> 21:39.000] And yet we keep re-electing these people to the same damn job. [21:39.000 --> 21:46.000] Knowing full well they haven't done what we hired them to do in the first place. [21:46.000 --> 21:52.000] When this mess that we're in is boiled down to the bottom of the cup, it's our fault. [21:52.000 --> 21:59.000] Because we have not used the power that was granted to us as the people to put a stop to it. [21:59.000 --> 22:07.000] The kind of thing that's going on in this country right now is why the second amendment exists. [22:07.000 --> 22:12.000] It's why the redress of grievances clause exists. [22:12.000 --> 22:18.000] The second amendment is there for when the redress of grievances clause fails to work. [22:18.000 --> 22:26.000] Because it's either being refused or ignored by those to whom it applies. [22:26.000 --> 22:35.000] It's not rebellion, insurrection or treason for the people to take back their country from a corrupt government such as we have. [22:35.000 --> 22:37.000] At any level. [22:37.000 --> 22:39.000] And yet we're not willing to do it. [22:39.000 --> 22:45.000] We're willing to sit back and let it continue to grow like a festering cancer. [22:45.000 --> 22:48.000] And think voting is going to fix it. [22:48.000 --> 22:50.000] That's the problem. [22:50.000 --> 22:51.000] Newsflash, folks. [22:51.000 --> 22:56.000] Voting is the same thing. [22:56.000 --> 23:02.000] Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under the blood alcohol limit. [23:02.000 --> 23:09.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalyzers and a government cover up in a moment. [23:09.000 --> 23:11.000] Privacy is under attack. [23:11.000 --> 23:14.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [23:14.000 --> 23:19.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [23:19.000 --> 23:21.000] So protect your rights. [23:21.000 --> 23:24.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [23:24.000 --> 23:25.000] Privacy. [23:25.000 --> 23:27.000] It's worth hanging on to. [23:27.000 --> 23:34.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. [23:34.000 --> 23:38.000] Start over with Startpage. [23:38.000 --> 23:40.000] Ever hear the term fine farming? [23:40.000 --> 23:47.000] It's when cops fine innocent people to bring in revenue in its apparently big business in the Sunshine State of Florida. [23:47.000 --> 23:53.000] This case involves breathalyzers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations. [23:53.000 --> 23:57.000] Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated. [23:57.000 --> 24:01.000] State officials knew about it for two and a half years but did nothing. [24:01.000 --> 24:07.000] In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document the problem. [24:07.000 --> 24:15.000] A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life, but now that the cover up has been exposed, perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier. [24:15.000 --> 24:24.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [24:24.000 --> 24:29.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [24:29.000 --> 24:31.000] The government says that fire brought it down. [24:31.000 --> 24:36.000] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. [24:36.000 --> 24:39.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [24:39.000 --> 24:42.000] And thousands of my fellow first responders have died. [24:42.000 --> 24:43.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [24:43.000 --> 24:44.000] I'm a structural engineer. [24:44.000 --> 24:46.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. [24:46.000 --> 24:47.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [24:47.000 --> 24:48.000] I'm a father who lost his son. [24:48.000 --> 24:51.000] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [24:51.000 --> 24:55.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [24:55.000 --> 24:59.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [24:59.000 --> 25:01.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [25:01.000 --> 25:06.000] And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [25:06.000 --> 25:13.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [25:13.000 --> 25:19.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [25:19.000 --> 25:29.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [25:29.000 --> 25:34.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [25:34.000 --> 25:41.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [25:41.000 --> 25:44.000] hundreds of research documents and other useful resource materials. [25:44.000 --> 25:48.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [25:48.000 --> 25:54.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [25:54.000 --> 26:05.000] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [26:05.000 --> 26:14.000] I'm on the highway to hell, highway to hell. [26:14.000 --> 26:20.000] I'm on the highway to hell. [26:20.000 --> 26:29.000] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984 with your host, Eddie Craig. [26:29.000 --> 26:38.000] All right. Now, as I was saying before we went to break, you people need to start thinking voting like cancer patients have to think of chemotherapy. [26:38.000 --> 26:48.000] Is the cure worse than the disease? Does the cure actually help, or does it eventually make things worse? [26:48.000 --> 26:59.000] And if it does make things better in the short term, what is your quality of life going to be like while you're suffering from its effects? [26:59.000 --> 27:05.000] That, ladies and gentlemen, is exactly the description of voting in this country. [27:05.000 --> 27:10.000] All right. Now, back to you, Charles. [27:10.000 --> 27:18.000] Yeah, voting, if voting was the answer to all of our problems, we wouldn't have any problems today. [27:18.000 --> 27:25.000] Oh, I don't know about that. They don't hand out IQ tests before allowing you to vote. [27:25.000 --> 27:35.000] So I don't know that that really is a correct statement. [27:35.000 --> 27:42.000] You know, that was my thought on it. If voting really worked, we wouldn't have any problems, obviously. [27:42.000 --> 27:48.000] Well, as the other old saying goes, if voting really made a difference, they wouldn't let us do it. [27:48.000 --> 28:01.000] Oh, well, there you go. But yeah, man, I appreciate you getting out here, getting on it, and I'm going to purchase that book from you as soon as you're done with it. [28:01.000 --> 28:14.000] And I have another question. Are you still doing the Brave New Books lectures there out in Austin? [28:14.000 --> 28:21.000] Not at Brave New Books. Brave New Books shut down several years ago, so it's not there anymore. [28:21.000 --> 28:29.000] However, I have now, since June of last year, taken the classes and put them online for a monthly subscription. [28:29.000 --> 28:35.000] It's the same rate the live class was, 20 bucks a class, except you have to pay for it a month at a time. [28:35.000 --> 28:44.000] You can also do six months or 12 months, and you get a 10% or 15% discount respectively for paying for the six or 12 months in advance. [28:44.000 --> 28:55.000] Otherwise, you can do 80 bucks a month a month, and it's the same as, and sometimes you get four classes, sometimes you get five classes in a month. [28:55.000 --> 29:01.000] So you're not paying for each individual class, you're paying for however many classes actually fit in that month. [29:01.000 --> 29:10.000] And the only time that we don't have classes on our scheduled day is when we are in the same week as an actual national holiday. [29:10.000 --> 29:22.000] Or I have some sort of problem going on here that prevents me from getting on to teach the class, such as electricity being out, internet being out, or somebody shot me and I had to shoot them back. [29:22.000 --> 29:26.000] Uh-oh. Yep. [29:26.000 --> 29:29.000] So listen, man, if you got some other callers, I'm going to let you get to it. [29:29.000 --> 29:33.000] No, at the moment, you're still the only one I got on the board. [29:33.000 --> 29:40.000] Okay, awesome. I know you're familiar with the other caller, Olivier. [29:40.000 --> 29:41.000] Yes. [29:41.000 --> 29:42.000] I think that's his name. [29:42.000 --> 29:43.000] Yeah. [29:43.000 --> 29:46.000] He brought up something that was very interesting to me. [29:46.000 --> 30:11.000] I think it was a couple of weeks ago or it might have been a recording about a due process violation when you get a ticket and they impose this ticket on you without having a hearing about you being able to actually afford to pay this ticket and them just suspending your license when you don't pay it and taking away your life license. [30:11.000 --> 30:12.000] Yes. [30:12.000 --> 30:23.000] The Supreme Court ruled a long time ago that a license attached to an occupation or livelihood cannot be taken away without due process. [30:23.000 --> 30:31.000] And so that's the whole reason why Chapter 701 of the Texas Transportation Code was repealed almost in its entirety. [30:31.000 --> 30:36.000] That was the very chapter that authorized exactly that kind of thing here in Texas. [30:36.000 --> 30:38.000] It was called administrative fees. [30:38.000 --> 30:42.000] The problem with the administrative fees in any state is this. [30:42.000 --> 30:48.000] One, they are a punishment on top of the original fine. [30:48.000 --> 30:53.000] They are never adjudicated like the fine amount is. [30:53.000 --> 30:58.000] In other words, you go to court, you're arguing over the fine and court costs. [30:58.000 --> 30:59.000] Okay? [30:59.000 --> 31:05.000] Whereas the administrative fees, you didn't have a chance to challenge the administrative fees anywhere at any time for any reason. [31:05.000 --> 31:07.000] They were just there. [31:07.000 --> 31:10.000] And if you didn't pay them, they took your license. [31:10.000 --> 31:11.000] Okay? [31:11.000 --> 31:16.000] That was deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court a very long time ago. [31:16.000 --> 31:20.000] I said that about the way this operated in Texas for a very long time. [31:20.000 --> 31:24.000] Finally, somebody listened and repealed the freaking chapter. [31:24.000 --> 31:25.000] It's not there anymore. [31:25.000 --> 31:28.000] But that's what Olivier is talking about. [31:28.000 --> 31:35.000] When they suspend your license without a hearing, that's a due process violation, according to the Supreme Court. [31:35.000 --> 31:47.000] When they assess administrative fees without any adjudication of the validity of those fees, that, too, is a due process violation [31:47.000 --> 31:55.000] because you're being fined punitively with no recourse. [31:55.000 --> 31:57.000] Okay. [31:57.000 --> 32:01.000] Now, what kind of remedy can we get from this? [32:01.000 --> 32:06.000] Do you have a strategy about that or a chapter about that in your book? [32:06.000 --> 32:11.000] Well, remedy in relation to what? [32:11.000 --> 32:14.000] So, you know. [32:14.000 --> 32:17.000] Are you talking about this issue specifically? [32:17.000 --> 32:18.000] Yes. [32:18.000 --> 32:20.000] Yes. [32:20.000 --> 32:21.000] Well, yeah. [32:21.000 --> 32:24.000] I mean, I'll discuss it just like I did in the original book. [32:24.000 --> 32:30.000] In the original book, I talked about why it was unconstitutional because those fees were never adjudicated. [32:30.000 --> 32:33.000] Most states right now don't do that. [32:33.000 --> 32:35.000] Some did, like Texas. [32:35.000 --> 32:39.000] And there are probably others, though I don't know which ones they may be. [32:39.000 --> 32:43.000] But if a state does do that, they've got a problem. [32:43.000 --> 32:49.000] One of the places that I know that does do something similar is California. [32:49.000 --> 32:56.000] Because in California, your first appearance before somebody is never before a judicial officer. [32:56.000 --> 33:04.000] It's always before some commissioner, which is literally a clerk-court moonlighting. [33:04.000 --> 33:05.000] Okay. [33:05.000 --> 33:16.000] The commissioners you appear before in California for traffic ticket infractions are actually no more than court clerks moonlighting from their day job. [33:16.000 --> 33:24.000] And the problem there is that creates a direct conflict of interest both in the court or between the court and this process. [33:24.000 --> 33:30.000] Plus, they're there to rubber stamp the fine, not to give you due process. [33:30.000 --> 33:42.000] So there's nothing in the first level of a California traffic situation that has to do with fairness and impartiality or anything similar to that. [33:42.000 --> 33:47.000] It's all about rubber stamping the fine. [33:47.000 --> 33:55.000] So it's imperative that you understand what the limits of authority on someone like that commissioner actually is, [33:55.000 --> 34:02.000] so that you can hold that commissioner to the rules and force them to do what they have to do according to law, [34:02.000 --> 34:09.000] not what they want to do according to getting in their paycheck. [34:09.000 --> 34:17.000] Now, you bring up an interesting point. [34:17.000 --> 34:19.000] You know, what I would like to see... [34:19.000 --> 34:21.000] You dropped out, Charles. [34:21.000 --> 34:22.000] I can't hear you. [34:22.000 --> 34:24.000] Can you hear me now? [34:24.000 --> 34:25.000] Nope. [34:25.000 --> 34:30.000] I can barely hear your tinny sound in the background. [34:30.000 --> 34:31.000] What about now? [34:31.000 --> 34:32.000] Okay. [34:32.000 --> 34:33.000] There you go. [34:33.000 --> 34:36.000] Okay. [34:36.000 --> 34:38.000] I wanted to bring up another point. [34:38.000 --> 34:40.000] You moved. [34:40.000 --> 34:41.000] Oh, no. [34:41.000 --> 34:42.000] There you go. [34:42.000 --> 34:43.000] There you go. [34:43.000 --> 34:44.000] Stay right there. [34:44.000 --> 34:46.000] Don't tilt your head either way. [34:46.000 --> 34:47.000] I'm sorry. [34:47.000 --> 34:48.000] That's okay. [34:48.000 --> 34:49.000] It's all right, man. [34:49.000 --> 34:50.000] I know. [34:50.000 --> 34:55.000] That metal plate, that's the problem. [34:55.000 --> 35:04.000] What I want to know is, is there a way that we could do something to where, okay, [35:04.000 --> 35:10.000] the court can make these fines, but they can't keep any of the proceeds, [35:10.000 --> 35:14.000] and you can't piggyback off the state's fines? [35:14.000 --> 35:18.000] Well, see, here's the problem, okay? [35:18.000 --> 35:23.000] There's also a chapter in the new book that deals exactly with this situation. [35:23.000 --> 35:27.000] Once you understand how the fine system works in every state, [35:27.000 --> 35:31.000] you'll come to understand that there is a criminal enterprise in operation. [35:31.000 --> 35:35.000] That criminal enterprise is money laundering, okay? [35:35.000 --> 35:40.000] Do you know how money laundering works? [35:40.000 --> 35:42.000] I do. [35:42.000 --> 35:43.000] Okay. [35:43.000 --> 35:47.000] In the states, with this fine process, the way they do it is, [35:47.000 --> 35:56.000] the state statutes contain a specific requirement that any funds collected in fines [35:56.000 --> 36:01.000] have to be put into a specific fund at the local level. [36:01.000 --> 36:06.000] Here in Texas, it's road and bridge, okay? [36:06.000 --> 36:15.000] And half of the fine goes to the local political subdivision to put in their fund. [36:15.000 --> 36:18.000] The other half goes directly to the state. [36:18.000 --> 36:29.000] However, the political subdivision gets to keep 100% of all court costs and fees that they charge. [36:29.000 --> 36:37.000] So on top of 50% of the fine, they also get money in fees and court costs, okay? [36:37.000 --> 36:39.000] Oh, hang on, I got a break. [36:39.000 --> 36:42.000] Let me get back on the other side of the break, and I'll finish explaining this to you, all right? [36:42.000 --> 36:43.000] So hang on just a minute. [36:43.000 --> 36:48.000] 512-646-1984, folks, give us a call, get in line, let's talk. [36:48.000 --> 36:54.000] We are live on Valentine's Day. [36:54.000 --> 36:57.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [36:57.000 --> 37:01.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, [37:01.000 --> 37:09.000] the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [37:09.000 --> 37:12.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [37:12.000 --> 37:16.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [37:16.000 --> 37:21.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [37:21.000 --> 37:27.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [37:27.000 --> 37:32.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [37:32.000 --> 37:36.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [37:36.000 --> 37:42.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [37:42.000 --> 37:45.000] pro se tactics, and much more. [37:45.000 --> 37:54.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [37:54.000 --> 37:55.000] I love logos. [37:55.000 --> 37:59.000] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [37:59.000 --> 38:02.000] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [38:02.000 --> 38:03.000] I need my truth pick. [38:03.000 --> 38:05.000] I'd be lost without logos. [38:05.000 --> 38:08.000] And I really want to help keep this network on the air. [38:08.000 --> 38:11.000] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, [38:11.000 --> 38:15.000] and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [38:15.000 --> 38:17.000] How can I help logos? [38:17.000 --> 38:19.000] Well, I'm glad you asked. [38:19.000 --> 38:22.000] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. [38:22.000 --> 38:26.000] When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, the first thing you do is clear your cookies. [38:26.000 --> 38:29.000] Now, go to logosradio.com. [38:29.000 --> 38:32.000] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [38:32.000 --> 38:38.000] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and logos gets a few pesos. [38:38.000 --> 38:39.000] Do I pay extra? [38:39.000 --> 38:40.000] No. [38:40.000 --> 38:42.000] Do I have to do anything different when I order? [38:42.000 --> 38:43.000] No. [38:43.000 --> 38:44.000] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [38:44.000 --> 38:45.000] No. [38:45.000 --> 38:46.000] I mean, yes. [38:46.000 --> 38:49.000] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money. [38:49.000 --> 38:50.000] This is perfect. [38:50.000 --> 38:52.000] Thank you so much. [38:52.000 --> 38:53.000] You're welcome. [38:53.000 --> 39:03.000] Happy holidays, logos. [39:24.000 --> 39:27.000] All right, folks, we are back. [39:27.000 --> 39:32.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984. [39:32.000 --> 39:37.000] We are live tonight, February 14th, 2022. [39:37.000 --> 39:40.000] All right, and I have Charles from Georgia on the line. [39:40.000 --> 39:47.000] Charles, if you would like to hear it, I would like to read you something out of another chapter in the new book [39:47.000 --> 39:50.000] on the subject of the money laundering. [39:50.000 --> 39:52.000] You up for it? [39:52.000 --> 39:53.000] What do you do? [39:53.000 --> 39:54.000] All right. [39:54.000 --> 40:01.000] Now, it starts off from ending from another discussion about jury notification, so just be aware of that. [40:01.000 --> 40:08.000] Using jury notification, we can ensure that this kind of illegal fraud and racketeering is not only no longer cost-effective to implement, [40:08.000 --> 40:13.000] it will become impossible to maintain and fund without the revenue these schemes generate, [40:13.000 --> 40:21.000] being used to backfill the budgetary voids and other accounts that expenditures on such policing and kangaroo courts would otherwise create. [40:21.000 --> 40:29.000] In short, the funds illegally extorted from the public can no longer be filtered and cleaned by the equally illegal process of money laundering, [40:29.000 --> 40:35.000] which is exactly what every single municipal city council and county commissioners court is engaged in. [40:35.000 --> 40:42.000] In case you aren't all that well versed in what makes these activities money laundering, let this writer break it down for you. [40:42.000 --> 40:48.000] In this context, money laundering is a process whereby the funds extorted from the public by and through the courts [40:48.000 --> 40:58.000] is then placed into some legally designated and earmarked budget account or accounts that cannot be used to fund the courts, at least not directly. [40:58.000 --> 41:09.000] However, this does ensure that money from other budgetary accounts does not have to be used for the projects paid from the earmarked accounts. [41:09.000 --> 41:18.000] This, in turn, leaves budgetary room available within these other accounts to then allocate and draw funds for the courts so as to continue the process. [41:18.000 --> 41:25.000] For example, the court collects funds in the form of fines and fees that are then paid into account A. [41:25.000 --> 41:32.000] The money in account A is earmarked to fund specific projects, Road and Bridge in Texas, by law. [41:32.000 --> 41:42.000] Now, as long as law enforcement and the local courts keep generating money and stocking account A, no money has to be allocated from any other accounts, [41:42.000 --> 41:49.000] like accounts B through Z, for instance, to fund any Road and Bridge specific projects. [41:49.000 --> 42:00.000] This means accounts B through Z now has enough offset of funds from across this spread of accounts that funding can now be skimmed off and allocated back to the courts. [42:00.000 --> 42:11.000] However, without these offsetting funds being placed into account A, at least some of funding would have to be allocated from accounts B and Z for the Road and Bridge projects, [42:11.000 --> 42:16.000] making less money available overall for other budgetary concerns. [42:16.000 --> 42:26.000] Thus, the original funds are laundered when they are placed into account A, and replacement funding for the courts is then drawn from across the other B through Z accounts. [42:26.000 --> 42:36.000] It is imperative that the municipality or county appear to avoid allocating the original funds directly back into the coffers of the same court and police department, [42:36.000 --> 42:45.000] because that would result in a publicly visible and highly illegal conflict of interest wherein the courts and law enforcement agencies are seen as generating more funds for themselves [42:45.000 --> 42:54.000] simply by issuing more citations and ensuring more convictions whenever they wish, which they do anyway virtually every single day. [42:54.000 --> 43:05.000] This process of layering financial transactions in order to cover up the extortion of money from the members of the public while obfuscating and avoiding the disclosure of the inherent conflict of interest involved [43:05.000 --> 43:18.000] if the same money were then used to directly fund the very law enforcement agency and court that cooperated to extort it in the first place is the very definition of money laundering, to wit. [43:18.000 --> 43:27.000] Money laundering refers to a financial transaction scheme that aims to conceal the identity, source, and destination of illicitly obtained money. [43:27.000 --> 43:31.000] The money laundering process can be broken down into three stages. [43:31.000 --> 43:37.000] First, the illegal activity that garners the money places it in the launderer's hands. [43:37.000 --> 43:46.000] Second, the launderer passes the money through a complex scheme of transactions to obscure who initially received the money from the criminal enterprise. [43:46.000 --> 43:52.000] Third, the scheme returns the money to the launderer in an obscure and indirect way. [43:52.000 --> 44:02.000] Now, that is how Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute defines the term money laundering, what I just read to you. [44:02.000 --> 44:13.000] So as long as the police and courts can collect more funds for filling account A than they actually spend, the scheme remains profitable across the other budgetary accounts. [44:13.000 --> 44:24.000] The entirety of the funding, ladies and gentlemen, is what we need to start taking away so that the predatory policing and prosecutions being used to generate it will be forced to stop. [44:24.000 --> 44:27.000] Amen and pass the ammo. [44:27.000 --> 44:28.000] There you go. [44:28.000 --> 44:31.000] All right. [44:31.000 --> 44:33.000] Did that make sense? [44:33.000 --> 44:35.000] Oh yeah, it makes all the sense in the world. [44:35.000 --> 44:51.000] And to piggyback off of what you just said, I just got a notification that Democrats are vowing to fight any efforts to defund the police. [44:51.000 --> 44:56.000] Right, after screaming for defunding the entire last two years. [44:56.000 --> 45:09.000] This is something people, you remember what I said about there's no IQ test before you get to vote? [45:09.000 --> 45:10.000] Yep. [45:10.000 --> 45:11.000] Okay. [45:11.000 --> 45:22.000] The same people that are supporting the Democrats who claim to be wanting to defund the police are the same people that will be supporting the Democrats who now swear they'll stop any attempt to defund the police. [45:22.000 --> 45:35.000] Okay, I'm the kind of person that when I see a leopard walk through a shower and come out without spots, I realize I was never looking at a leopard in the first place. [45:35.000 --> 45:48.000] The people that keep supporting people that flip-flop like this, they don't have the mentality to be self-sufficient and make things right, much less be responsible voters. [45:48.000 --> 46:05.000] I mean, to be able to take somebody lying to your face day in and day out and believing them regardless of the evidence to the contrary, that takes a special level of stupid. [46:05.000 --> 46:07.000] It does. [46:07.000 --> 46:12.000] It does, without a doubt. [46:12.000 --> 46:18.000] I have one more thing. [46:18.000 --> 46:24.000] I think I called in and asked you about the land paddle last week. [46:24.000 --> 46:28.000] Okay. [46:28.000 --> 46:41.000] And I wanted you to get into it a little bit, whatever you know a little bit this week, if you could. [46:41.000 --> 46:45.000] Well, what I know is based upon what a Texas land patent says. [46:45.000 --> 46:49.000] I can't speak as to what every land patent says. [46:49.000 --> 47:01.000] The only land patents I've ever seen, I've seen the ones that are issued for Texas, and I've seen one that was issued originally by the federal government in the state of Arizona. [47:01.000 --> 47:22.000] So, but the language in both of them are still very similar in that the original patent issuer, which in Arizona was the federal government when it was still a territory rather than a state, and here in Texas, it was issued by the Texas government and signed by the governor. [47:22.000 --> 47:25.000] Every land patent bore the governor's signature. [47:25.000 --> 47:38.000] Okay? Both of them contain the same phrase that says that all rights and claims to the property are ceded forever to whoever is named in the patent. [47:38.000 --> 47:56.000] So, they relinquish all claims and rights to the property, and in neither case do I recall seeing a clause that reserved the right to tax or exercise eminent domain over said property. [47:56.000 --> 47:58.000] Okay? [47:58.000 --> 48:10.000] And according to United States Supreme Court rulings on such things in the past, okay, if the government is just like a city charter when it comes to that. [48:10.000 --> 48:22.000] Here in Texas and every other state that I'm aware of, the courts have ruled that when something does not appear in a city charter, the city does not have the power to do what's not in the charter. [48:22.000 --> 48:25.000] If it's not in there, they can't do it. [48:25.000 --> 48:34.000] Well, the government has, the Supreme Court has ruled the same thing about when government issues patents on property. [48:34.000 --> 48:54.000] If they don't reserve particular rights when they relinquish all rights and claims, that means they relinquished every right and claim, including the right to tax and to foreclose through eminent domain, and that's a binding agreement that they cannot just ignore. [48:54.000 --> 49:23.000] And because it's a binding agreement, my argument to folks that are fighting property taxes and things of that nature that actually have a valid land patent carried forward in their name is to sue the state for breach of contract and to sue the political subdivision that's actually assessing and trying to collect the tax for tortious interference with that contract. [49:23.000 --> 49:37.000] And there's absolutely no way that you should be able to lose, considering the Supreme Court has already ruled in your favor many times over. [49:37.000 --> 49:54.000] That when the government engages in negotiable instruments and other types of commercial contracts and things like these contractual agreements and patents, they are bound by the terms of the agreement and cannot claim immunity for any clause in it that protects either party. [49:54.000 --> 50:09.000] In other words, they can't say, we're the government, we do what we want. No, you can't. The moment you engaged in this contract, you became like any other corporation, and the limit of your authority is the same as any other corporation would have. [50:09.000 --> 50:18.000] So if you didn't put it in the contract that you had the authority to reserve and do this thing, you don't have it. [50:18.000 --> 50:26.000] To my knowledge, no one has taken that argument forward, and for the last of me, I can't figure out why. [50:26.000 --> 50:35.000] That's a good way to attack. I think people want to attack it in a different way because it's logical. [50:35.000 --> 50:45.000] They do. They want to declare that they want to fight the tax, saying the tax is unconstitutional. That's why they lose. [50:45.000 --> 50:55.000] It has nothing to do with the tax being constitutional. The tax itself is perfectly constitutional if it's levied on property to which it can properly apply. [50:55.000 --> 51:16.000] But what is unconstitutional, and or now, more accurately, a breach of contract and tortious interference, is to inhibit the terms of the agreement itself, which every state constitution forbids its government to do. [51:16.000 --> 51:30.000] Every state constitution says the government of this state shall not impair the obligation of contracts. Does it not? Isn't that in every bill of rights? [51:30.000 --> 51:32.000] I lost you for a minute. [51:32.000 --> 51:38.000] I said, doesn't every bill of rights contain the government shall not impair the obligation of contracts? [51:38.000 --> 51:39.000] Yes. [51:39.000 --> 51:44.000] All right. Hang on, dude. I've got to take my top of the hour break. I'll be right back. [51:44.000 --> 51:52.000] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [51:52.000 --> 52:00.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [52:00.000 --> 52:03.000] Enter the recovery version. [52:03.000 --> 52:12.000] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [52:12.000 --> 52:22.000] The difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [52:22.000 --> 52:27.000] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [52:27.000 --> 52:41.000] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [52:41.000 --> 52:44.000] That's freestudybible.com. [52:44.000 --> 52:54.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [52:54.000 --> 52:58.000] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [52:58.000 --> 53:03.000] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it. [53:03.000 --> 53:09.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [53:09.000 --> 53:15.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [53:15.000 --> 53:20.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [53:20.000 --> 53:25.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [53:25.000 --> 53:27.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [53:27.000 --> 53:35.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [53:35.000 --> 53:39.000] Start over with Startpage. [53:39.000 --> 53:45.000] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug. [53:45.000 --> 53:54.000] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [53:54.000 --> 53:57.000] Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [53:57.000 --> 54:07.000] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, [54:07.000 --> 54:14.000] one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to always be possible. [54:14.000 --> 54:27.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [54:27.000 --> 54:34.000] You may think our brains deteriorate with age, but new research shows that as brains get older, they actually work more efficiently. [54:34.000 --> 54:40.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with new research on how aging makes the mind sharper after this. [54:40.000 --> 54:46.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [54:46.000 --> 54:51.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [54:51.000 --> 54:56.000] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [54:56.000 --> 54:59.000] Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. [54:59.000 --> 55:06.000] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [55:06.000 --> 55:10.000] Start over with StartPage. [55:10.000 --> 55:14.000] It's a widely held notion that the older people get, the more doddering they become. [55:14.000 --> 55:19.000] But new research shows that even as our brains age, they can actually become more efficient. [55:19.000 --> 55:29.000] Scientists asked two groups of volunteers, one age 18 to 35 and the other 55 to 75, to associate different words with given topics. [55:29.000 --> 55:32.000] At one point, they told everyone they'd made a mistake. [55:32.000 --> 55:36.000] When that happened, the younger group's brains lit up and lost focus. [55:36.000 --> 55:41.000] But the older group's brains didn't even flinch, and they stayed focused on solving the next task. [55:41.000 --> 55:45.000] The moral? There's something to be said for experience. [55:45.000 --> 55:55.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [55:55.000 --> 56:06.000] We make our own whiskey and our own smoke too. Ain't too many things these old boys can't do. [56:06.000 --> 56:10.000] We grow good old tomatoes and homemade wine. [56:10.000 --> 56:17.000] All right, folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio calling number 512-646-1984. [56:17.000 --> 56:22.000] Penny and E.J., I see you there on the board. Y'all hang on for just a second and I'll get to you. [56:22.000 --> 56:26.000] All right, Charles, what else you got, my friend? [56:26.000 --> 56:33.000] Buddy, that's all I got for today, man. I wanted to bring awareness to those couple of topics. [56:33.000 --> 56:37.000] Civil assets for Fisher and land passes. [56:37.000 --> 56:39.000] Well, I appreciate that. [56:39.000 --> 56:52.000] Yes, I think they're very important to our rights, and I think everybody should be aware and to start working towards those couple of things. [56:52.000 --> 56:53.000] Thanks, man. [56:53.000 --> 56:55.000] Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in. [56:55.000 --> 56:56.000] Thank you. [56:56.000 --> 56:57.000] Yes, bye-bye. [56:57.000 --> 57:03.000] You have a good night. All right, now we have Penny in Texas. Penny, what can we do for you? [57:03.000 --> 57:05.000] Hey, Eddie, how you doing? [57:05.000 --> 57:07.000] I'm doing great. [57:07.000 --> 57:09.000] Can you hear me okay? [57:09.000 --> 57:10.000] Yes, ma'am. [57:10.000 --> 57:23.000] Great. Yeah, that last Charles was pretty interesting there. I'm wondering, because of what he said, what's the difference between a land patent and a title? [57:23.000 --> 57:25.000] There's a huge difference. [57:25.000 --> 57:28.000] When you get a deed of trust for your land, what's the difference? [57:28.000 --> 57:39.000] A deed and a title are not in any way at all valid compared to a land patent. [57:39.000 --> 57:47.000] The difference is equity ownership via land patent or legal ownership via deed or title. [57:47.000 --> 57:49.000] What's the difference? [57:49.000 --> 58:06.000] The equity owner has full disposition of the property. They can buy it, sell it, transfer it, or destroy it with impunity, no limitations whatsoever, and that's someone with a patent. [58:06.000 --> 58:23.000] Someone with a deed or title can only possess it, sell it, but they cannot transfer it and they cannot destroy it because they are a legal owner, i.e., someone that leases a car, for instance. [58:23.000 --> 58:31.000] They're the legal owner, but they better not destroy that car and not pay for it. You see what I'm saying? [58:31.000 --> 58:32.000] I do. [58:32.000 --> 58:46.000] Okay. It's exactly the same thing. In fact, I have seen in our county clerk's office back in my hometown of Nacogdoches, I looked at some of the stuff when I was working with an oil and gas land man doing some research down there, [58:46.000 --> 59:01.000] and he was showing me some of the deeds and titles to people's property, and under where the person's name was listed on the deed or title, it said either tenant or occupant. It did not say owner. [59:01.000 --> 59:14.000] Okay, so my daughter and her husband, they have land that was handed down to him, you know, through generations, so how would they go about patenting it? [59:14.000 --> 59:23.000] They have to go back and find the original land patent that covered the parcel of land that their parcel came from, okay? [59:23.000 --> 59:24.000] Okay. [59:24.000 --> 59:30.000] They then have to follow chain of title from that original patent forward to date. [59:30.000 --> 59:31.000] Okay. [59:31.000 --> 59:45.000] Once they show a clear chain of title, this is exactly the same way oil and gas land men have to do research before they can go to the correct owner of a piece of property to get an oil and gas lease, same thing. [59:45.000 --> 59:46.000] Okay. [59:46.000 --> 01:00:07.000] They then take that chain of title, and where they are supposed to take it in Texas is the Texas Land Office, and the Texas Land Office is supposed to confirm the research, if not actually do the research, and then once they've confirmed a clear chain of title with no money outstanding to any party along that chain, [01:00:07.000 --> 01:00:16.000] they are supposed to issue a new patent provided there's no loans or liens on the property at the time. [01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:30.000] They are required as their original purpose to issue a land patent for that portion of the land that is now under the possession of the this new individual, a new patent in their name. [01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:31.000] Okay. [01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:32.000] Okay. [01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:42.000] Now once they have that land patent carried forward in their name, they can replace the deed or title at the county clerk with a copy of that patent. [01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:43.000] Okay. [01:00:43.000 --> 01:01:00.000] If they do that, and then the county or the city or anyone else attempts to assess a property tax against that, then they need to get sued, because they are tortiously interfering with the contract between the landowner and the state of Texas. [01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:07.000] And then the state of Texas, if they don't intercede to stop it, needs to be sued for breach of contract. [01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:09.000] Okay. [01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:19.000] Okay, because the contract is the patent, and the agreement in the patent is between the state of Texas and the landholder. [01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:20.000] Okay. [01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:33.000] If the state waived all rights and claims to the property as the patent says they did, then they cannot delegate to a political subdivision of the state the power to levy a tax the state itself cannot levy. [01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:35.000] Okay. [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:50.000] So if I went out and I bought a two-acre parcel tomorrow, and I went and looked through the chain of patents without... [01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:51.000] The chain of title. [01:01:51.000 --> 01:01:59.000] The chain of title will be the deeds and titles, because no one will have gotten a patent issued to carry forward, at least not many people. [01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:15.000] It would have been done the first two or three people maybe from the original patent holder, but at some point they would have been switched over to just being issued a deed or a title, which is by far not the same thing. [01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:19.000] So how would I end up getting a patent on it? [01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:38.000] Well, like I said, you get the original patent that covered the plot of land you're talking about, then you follow the chain of title, which could either be from a succeeding patent when the land was divvied up to someone else or given over entirely to someone else. [01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:51.000] Because the patent covers all heirs and assigns, okay? Heirs are people that inherit the land, and assigns are people that are sold off pieces of the property from the original patent. [01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:52.000] Okay. [01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:53.000] Okay? [01:02:53.000 --> 01:02:54.000] Okay. [01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:04.000] So you would follow the chain of title, whether it be via land patent, deed or title, from the original patent forward. [01:03:04.000 --> 01:03:19.000] Once you have all those documents, and they prove that there are no outstanding liens or other encumbrances on the property, including, and if you bought that two acres, you'd have had to pay cash for it if you didn't want it encumbered. [01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:22.000] If you financed it, it's encumbered. [01:03:22.000 --> 01:03:24.000] Okay. [01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:37.000] So if you bought it outright and it's not encumbered, you could then take those chain of title documents to the land office, and they are supposed to give you a land patent. [01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:39.000] They won't. [01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:41.000] That's the problem. [01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:46.000] They have now decided they're not going to do the job they were created to do. [01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:54.000] Because if they do that, then you have legal standing to sue the state for trying to tax it. They don't want you to do that. [01:03:54.000 --> 01:03:56.000] They want the taxes. [01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:03.000] In other words, they're going to aid their boss, the state, in committing fraud against you, the landholder. [01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:10.000] So the first lawsuit you're going to have to file most likely will be against the land office. [01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:12.000] Okay. [01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:17.000] Well, I've only been studying this for a couple of years. [01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:22.000] But I didn't know about, I've heard people talk about the land patents, but I didn't understand it. [01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:25.000] So this is an explanation for me. [01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:27.000] Does that help? [01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:29.000] Yeah, it does a lot. [01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:34.000] Because I've been, you know, I've heard, I listened to Randy Kelton. [01:04:34.000 --> 01:04:36.000] I've been listening to him for a couple of years. [01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:43.000] I say they've mentioned it, and he was talking about the illegality, you know, of property taxes. [01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:46.000] But I could just never get clear on it. [01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:50.000] And so this really helped me. [01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:53.000] I didn't know how to explain it to my daughter and her husband. [01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:58.000] Yeah, there's a lady by the name of Jennifer Ruby. [01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:06.000] She's probably the foremost authority in Texas on the process for getting this done. [01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:11.000] And I've helped her and had discussions with her about how this has to be carried forward and handled. [01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:16.000] She's got her own website that has absolutely reams of information on it. [01:05:16.000 --> 01:05:33.000] It's called landgrantpatent.org, L-A-N-D, L-A-N-D, P-A-T-E-N-T, or I'm sorry, L-A-N-D-G-R-A-N-T as in Tom. [01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:41.000] P as in Paul, A-T-E-N-T dot org, landgrantpatent.org. [01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:43.000] I'll look it up. [01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:50.000] Okay, the reason that I originally called was about three years ago. [01:05:50.000 --> 01:05:54.000] I was coming back from a doctor's appointment with my dad. [01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:00.000] And I got pulled over by a policeman in Nacogdoches, by the way. [01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:08.000] And I had gotten my vehicle inspection sticker, but I hadn't put it on my window. [01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:13.000] And so he said he stopped me because, you know, I didn't have a vehicle inspection sticker. [01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:15.000] And I said, well, actually, I've got it. [01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:17.000] I just haven't put it on my window. [01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:26.000] I ended up, the short or the long of it is I ended up paying $175. [01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:28.000] I didn't go to court. [01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:31.000] I just went and paid the fine that he gave me. [01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:32.000] Why? [01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:37.000] Because he told me if I had to go to court, I'd end up paying $350. [01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:39.000] He's a liar. [01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:45.000] The statute is very clear that if you went to court and presented evidence that you had the sticker in your possession at the time [01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:53.000] and you were not beyond X number of days of expiration on the one you had, that the court had to dismiss the charge. [01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:55.000] The statute's very clear on that. [01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:59.000] Never take legal information from a cop. [01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:03.000] Never let a cop tell you what will happen in a courtroom. [01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:04.000] Never. [01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:10.000] So I've been learning that over the last couple of years. [01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:13.000] But this is the first time I've been able to catch a show. [01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:16.000] I've listened to some of your archive shows. [01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:23.000] But I'm going to let EJ get on here because I'm interested in hearing how she's doing with her stuff. [01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:24.000] Okay. [01:07:24.000 --> 01:07:25.000] All right. [01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:26.000] So I appreciate it so much, Eddie. [01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:27.000] Yes, ma'am. [01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:28.000] Thanks for calling. [01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:29.000] And I'll see you again on Mondays. [01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:30.000] All right. [01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:31.000] Thank you. [01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:32.000] Thank you very much. [01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:33.000] You're welcome. [01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:35.000] Thanks for calling. [01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:36.000] All right. [01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:41.000] Now we have EJ in looks like California. [01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:44.000] Is that right, EJ? [01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:45.000] Yes. [01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:46.000] Hi. [01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:47.000] Hi, Eddie. [01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:48.000] Hi. [01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:49.000] You're in California? [01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:50.000] Yes, California, Orange County. [01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:51.000] Okay. [01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:52.000] Yeah. [01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:55.000] Let me offer you my condolences on that point now. [01:07:55.000 --> 01:07:57.000] I know. [01:07:57.000 --> 01:08:00.000] So what can I do for you? [01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:03.000] Okay. [01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:10.000] So I served the hospital, and I'm still trying to find the security guard. [01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:15.000] They went to – there's two main hospital locations. [01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:26.000] The incident happened at the city, and they asked the security guard today, day meaning [01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:27.000] the process server. [01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:28.000] Right. [01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:33.000] So, yeah, he's no longer here. [01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:36.000] He's gone since six months ago. [01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:37.000] Yeah. [01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:44.000] So I know from last week's call, you recommended the motion for discovery. [01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:45.000] Right. [01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:50.000] So I'm going to ask for motion for discovery. [01:08:50.000 --> 01:08:54.000] How about request for production first before the motion? [01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:57.000] Because it's been what? [01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:01.000] Two and a half to three weeks now since I served them. [01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:03.000] Served the hospital. [01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:06.000] I'm still trying to find the security guard. [01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:07.000] He's nowhere. [01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:10.000] He's a ghost, by the way. [01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:12.000] Well, that's highly doubtful. [01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:15.000] Somebody knows where he is and how to get in touch with him. [01:09:15.000 --> 01:09:19.000] If they don't, then they're hiring known felons to do jobs they shouldn't be doing [01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:25.000] in the first place, and they don't want to keep track of them. [01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:29.000] Right. [01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:34.000] Which is a liability for them in and of itself. [01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:37.000] But somebody's got information on that security guard. [01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:40.000] You can bank on it. [01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:45.000] And if, regardless, if you can't get the security guard, you can sure as shoot [01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:48.000] and sue the company he worked for in his place. [01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:49.000] Hang on just a second. [01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:54.000] Let me get this break out of the way, and we'll be right back. [01:09:54.000 --> 01:09:57.000] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God [01:09:57.000 --> 01:09:59.000] and a better understanding of His Word? [01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:04.000] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time [01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:08.000] for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures [01:10:08.000 --> 01:10:11.000] in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [01:10:11.000 --> 01:10:13.000] Study to show thyself approved unto God, [01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:18.000] a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. [01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:21.000] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, [01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:25.000] where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:28.000] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week [01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:32.000] with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. [01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:37.000] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:40.000] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves [01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:43.000] more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:47.000] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com [01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:53.000] Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:20.000] How to answer letters and phone calls. [01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:23.000] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:27.000] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:32.000] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:35.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:38.000] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com [01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:43.000] and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com. [01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:51.000] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com [01:11:51.000 --> 01:12:19.000] to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:21.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:26.000] This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984 [01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:28.000] if you want to call and get in line. [01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:31.000] Right now, I'm still talking with E.J. in California. [01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:34.000] All right, E.J., let's continue. [01:12:34.000 --> 01:12:35.000] Okay. [01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:38.000] I accidentally hung up. [01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:41.000] So I've caught the last bit. [01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:45.000] Yeah, what I'm saying is that someone has contact information. [01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:47.000] There's no way someone does not, [01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:50.000] unless, like I said, this guy was a known felon [01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:53.000] and they did not want to keep up with him. [01:12:53.000 --> 01:12:57.000] But even so, if he can't be produced, [01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:03.000] you can still sue his employer as Respondent Superior. [01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:05.000] Correct, correct. [01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:08.000] He's probably with a contractor and not with a hospital, [01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:15.000] but I need to do either the request for production or the motion for discovery, [01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:20.000] asking the hospital who... [01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:28.000] You mentioned, can you help me with the language of it? [01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:35.000] Well, there should be some sort of book that you can get your hands on [01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:39.000] that deals with causes of action in the state of California [01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:43.000] that will tell you exactly what court cases you need to cite [01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:50.000] and how to word each of the particular portions of your complaint [01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:56.000] in order to state your claim in a way the court will recognize. [01:13:56.000 --> 01:13:58.000] But I can try. [01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:01.000] It really just depends on what you're trying to ask for, [01:14:01.000 --> 01:14:04.000] but yeah, I can try. [01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:05.000] Okay. [01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:08.000] Would the book be like the O'Connor's book of... [01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:13.000] The cases we have O'Connor's forms. [01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:18.000] And O'Connor's causes a civil action. [01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:22.000] Civil action, okay. [01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:25.000] But for California, there'll be different court cases, [01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:30.000] and they may use different language. [01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:34.000] So while O'Connor's would give you a good idea of what you're supposed to say, [01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:41.000] it's not going to directly align with how you need to do it for California. [01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:45.000] So it's the law library or... [01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:49.000] Yeah, the law library would most likely have what you need. [01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:55.000] If there's a large university close to you with a law library, they will too. [01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:58.000] Okay. [01:14:58.000 --> 01:15:07.000] But usually you want to make sure that the university officer offers some sort of JD degree, [01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:14.000] because that's usually the ones that will have the law libraries. [01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:16.000] Oh, I see. [01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:18.000] Okay. [01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:19.000] I think there is one. [01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:21.000] There's university here. [01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:25.000] I'll give them a call. [01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:33.000] If there's respondent superior would be the hospital, and then underneath the hospital... [01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:39.000] That depends on whether or not the security guard is an actual contractor versus an employee. [01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:44.000] If he's an employee, then yes, the hospital is respondent superior. [01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:52.000] If he's a contractor, then whoever he was contracted from is respondent superior. [01:15:52.000 --> 01:16:05.000] So on the complaint that I wrote that I got help on, I named the hospital as the respondent superior, [01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:07.000] because I have no information on him. [01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:08.000] Right. [01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:10.000] And see, that's where you can wind up with a problem. [01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:14.000] That's the other thing you need to check about the case law in California. [01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:20.000] When you're suing an entity that is working with contractors for certain positions, [01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:26.000] who does state law name as the respondent superior for the contractor? [01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:35.000] Is it the entity that they are contracted with, or is it the entity that supplied them as the contractor? [01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:55.000] I believe that even though he is a contractor, he was working on premise, you know, of the hospital. [01:16:55.000 --> 01:17:00.000] So the hospital still has the respondent superior. [01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:03.000] It doesn't matter if he was under a contractor. [01:17:03.000 --> 01:17:10.000] That could be true, but I'm just telling you, you want to verify that in something in law in the state, [01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:14.000] so that if somebody tries to throw that up, you've got an answer. [01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:18.000] Got it. Okay. [01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:25.000] This is the part about dotting your I's and crossing your T's. [01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:30.000] Okay. [01:17:30.000 --> 01:17:37.000] I'll have to look at the book on causes of action and go from there. [01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:49.000] Secondly, if we decide to start, you know, not registering our car registration, [01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:58.000] and since I own my car outright, I don't need insurance, what about our license? [01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:02.000] How do we? Well, here's the one thing about insurance, okay? [01:18:02.000 --> 01:18:03.000] And be aware of this. [01:18:03.000 --> 01:18:06.000] The insurance is not just to protect you from loss of property. [01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:13.000] It's to protect someone else if you are the one found to be the cause of any accident and injury. [01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:22.000] So without the insurance, you are susceptible directly to a lawsuit, and they can sue you right out of your house and home. [01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:28.000] Because there's no limit on what they can sue you for in that case. All right? [01:18:28.000 --> 01:18:37.000] Now, the other side of that coin is being compelled to pay for something that requires a contract to get. [01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:47.000] That's absolutely unconstitutional, but they make you do it anyway under the premise that you're operating in a manner that they can regulate, which you're not. [01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:54.000] Okay? But the other downside of the insurance is most insurance companies will not pay [01:18:54.000 --> 01:19:01.000] and will not be required to pay through the courts if you use their insurance, [01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:09.000] but you are not commercial ready by having a license, registration, and all that other stuff on your car. [01:19:09.000 --> 01:19:16.000] The game is rigged in that regard. Don't think otherwise. It is absolutely rigged. [01:19:16.000 --> 01:19:27.000] The only recourse you have is to protect yourself is to play along unless you're independently wealthy. [01:19:27.000 --> 01:19:31.000] Wow. I'm glad I asked you that question. [01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:40.000] Okay. So even though you may beat traffic tickets and things of that nature once you learn the ins and outs of how it's done and what the law actually says, [01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:51.000] if you ever get into an accident and are deemed to be the one at fault, your troubles will just be beginning. [01:19:51.000 --> 01:20:06.000] I got it. Yeah. So that's why all three requirements are pretty much we're just bound by it, you know, because like you said, independently wealthy, it doesn't matter. [01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:13.000] But yeah, now I understand. And there's no way I, you know, I totally forgot that the insurance, [01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:19.000] because I haven't had an accident in about maybe three years. So. [01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:26.000] Yeah. See, I've never had one either. I've had plenty of them given to me, but I've never had one. [01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:37.000] Yeah. We just never know. Okay. My third question then is, okay, my third question. [01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:48.000] So this is kind of interesting. California, the state income, they call it franchise board in Sacramento. [01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:59.000] They send me, yeah, like three page, four page questionnaire saying that why didn't you file taxes for this year? [01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:05.000] And they go, well, you had a mortgage, you know, they flag me. [01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:12.000] Well, the thing about it is California, like every other state, their income tax laws are based upon the federal income tax laws. [01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:19.000] In other words, if you don't owe a federal income tax, you cannot owe a state income tax. [01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:28.000] Okay. So if your argument is I am not a taxpayer at the federal level, hence I am not a taxpayer at the state level, [01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:32.000] then you can fight them and make that argument and win as long as you know what the law is. [01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:38.000] But if you're going to do that, I highly recommend you get Dave Champion's book, Income Tax Shattering the Myths, [01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:45.000] and you understand it before you ever start to try it. [01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:47.000] Shattering the myths? [01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:54.000] Income Tax Shattering the Myths as an MYTHS. [01:21:54.000 --> 01:21:58.000] Okay. Thank you. [01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:19.000] Anyway, I just didn't respond to them, so that was my mistake. And they start, they did threaten in their second letter saying that we're going to stop your, they're going to suspend my license, right? [01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:21.000] And then. [01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:25.000] How can they suspend your license for a mortgage? [01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:28.000] I have no idea. But they did. [01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:30.000] They didn't, they didn't. [01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:32.000] Okay, I'll explain it. [01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:36.000] Okay. Well, hang on a sec. Let me take this break and I'll be right back. [01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:54.000] All right, folks. 512-646-1984. I got a half an hour left in the show. If you want to talk, now's the time to get in line. We will be right back after this break. [01:22:54.000 --> 01:23:02.000] It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number, and date of birth. But you should think twice before giving away your personal data. [01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:06.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll say more in just a moment. [01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:13.000] Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive database of your personal information. [01:23:13.000 --> 01:23:14.000] That's creepy. [01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:16.000] But it doesn't have to be that way. [01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:26.000] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third party certified. [01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:33.000] If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. Great search results and total privacy. [01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:36.000] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:43.000] Forms, forms, forms. They're everywhere. But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it. [01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:50.000] I lay blank spaces on forms all the time, or I write N slash A for not applicable, and usually nobody notices or cares. [01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:57.000] I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement, [01:23:57.000 --> 01:24:03.000] and I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually want them to call me, and that's pretty rare. [01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:08.000] To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests. [01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:12.000] It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier the more you do it. [01:24:12.000 --> 01:24:17.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:30.000] I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001. [01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:34.000] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. [01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:38.000] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. [01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:41.000] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7. [01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:47.000] Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story. [01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:50.000] Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. [01:24:50.000 --> 01:24:56.000] Go to buildingwatch.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [01:24:56.000 --> 01:25:00.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:02.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:07.000] If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:12.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, [01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:14.000] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:20.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:23.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:28.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is [01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:30.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:35.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:40.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:45.000] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:49.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:54.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:25:54.000 --> 01:26:04.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:38.000] Look at them yo-yos, that's the way you do it. [01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:42.000] You play the guitar on the MTV. [01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:45.000] That ain't workin', that's the way you do it. [01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:49.000] Money for nothing when you're too crazy. [01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:53.000] Now that ain't workin', that's the way you do it. [01:26:53.000 --> 01:26:56.000] Damn guys ain't dumb. [01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:58.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:03.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, callin' number 512-646-1984. [01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:08.000] We got a half an hour left in the show, and right now we are talkin' to E.J. in California. [01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:12.000] All right, E.J., please continue. [01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:18.000] So, uh, Franchise Board in Sacramento. [01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:27.000] Yeah, the, again, how they can suspend your license is without a due process hearing. [01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:37.000] That's a problem, because the Supreme Court says they can't do that. [01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:45.000] I got a letter from the DMV saying that they're going to suspend my license. [01:27:45.000 --> 01:27:48.000] Unless you did what? [01:27:48.000 --> 01:28:00.000] Unless I have my doctor, my physician, go over all the mental and physical aspects of me, [01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:04.000] because they got something saying that there's something wrong with me. [01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:06.000] And that's from that task force. [01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:07.000] I know it. [01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:11.000] Where else can it come from? [01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:12.000] You know? [01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:19.000] Okay, in that paperwork, did they offer you an opportunity to request a hearing? [01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:32.000] No, they said by this date, if we don't, if you don't sign off saying that we can get your health record, [01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:36.000] your license will be suspended on January 4th. [01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:42.000] I gave them, I gave them the, I mean, I don't want my license suspended. [01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:47.000] So I signed it, but with an expiration date on there. [01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:50.000] What do you mean with an expiration date? [01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:58.000] I just put an expiration date next to my signature saying that if this expires, [01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:02.000] you can get my health record, but it expires on this date. [01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:04.000] And that was on the 31st of January. [01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:07.000] Why would you let them have your health records to begin with? [01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:08.000] I don't know. [01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:13.000] What does the state DMV need with your health records? [01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:20.000] What legitimate legal reason would they have for getting into your health records? [01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:21.000] Yeah, I know. [01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:25.000] I should have called you before, prior, but I didn't. [01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:26.000] I have no idea. [01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:30.000] You need to see where they think they got that authority from. [01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:34.000] Okay, through public records? [01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:37.000] Well, it's going, no, through what law? [01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:42.000] What law gave them the authority to demand and get that information? [01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:44.000] Okay. [01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:47.000] Because the only way they could have got it is by law. [01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:55.000] So who made that law and how can it be legitimate? [01:29:55.000 --> 01:30:00.000] When I write the letter, do I write it to the DMV? [01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:10.000] No, this is going back to that law library research we were talking about. [01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:11.000] Can you clarify? [01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:12.000] What do you mean? [01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:14.000] I don't know. [01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:16.000] What do you mean, like? [01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:21.000] On your lawsuit, you've got to do some research at the law library for some of this stuff, [01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:24.000] the forms and all that other kind of stuff, right? [01:30:24.000 --> 01:30:25.000] Yes. [01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:26.000] Okay. [01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:34.000] Well, while you're in the law library, you're going to want to find out what law gave the DMV this authority. [01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:35.000] Oh, I see. [01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:36.000] Yes. [01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:43.000] You can send a notice to the DMV requesting that they tell you what authority they used to make that demand, [01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:51.000] but they may not answer you, in which case you still won't know unless you get it yourself. [01:30:51.000 --> 01:30:52.000] And so why bother? [01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:58.000] Go ahead and send the letter asking for it, but be prepared to do it yourself and just get it done. [01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:05.000] Somebody's got to know. [01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:08.000] When you send a letter... [01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:09.000] Don't send a letter. [01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:12.000] Send a public records request. [01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:13.000] Oh, okay. [01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:14.000] Gotcha. [01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:17.000] Okay. [01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:18.000] Yeah. [01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:19.000] Okay. [01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:20.000] Yeah. [01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:30.000] So you people sent me a letter on this date and this time with this subject line originating from this particular office, [01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:32.000] with this subject line. [01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:38.000] I need to know within this document, it says that you want access to my medical records. [01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:45.000] I need to know about what legal authority gave you the power to demand access to my medical records. [01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:53.000] What statute, ordinance, or law are you claiming made this possible? [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:58.000] Okay. [01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:06.000] And make sure you ask for any policy manuals, procedures, or things of that nature upon which they base that request. [01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:15.000] If you just ask for the law, they're going to deny it saying we don't do legal research for the people. [01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:16.000] Okay. [01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:23.000] But if you ask for specific documents that they are responsible for, then they have to provide it. [01:32:23.000 --> 01:32:38.000] So ask for policy manuals, procedures, memorandums, anything they used to write up that notice alleging the authority to access medical records. [01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:39.000] Okay. [01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:41.000] Okay. [01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:42.000] Okay. Thank you. [01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:43.000] You're very welcome. [01:32:43.000 --> 01:32:46.000] Thanks for calling in. [01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:47.000] Okay. [01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:48.000] Bye-bye. [01:32:48.000 --> 01:32:49.000] All right. [01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:51.000] Now we have Jane in Texas. [01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:53.000] Jane, what can we do for you? [01:32:53.000 --> 01:32:54.000] Hi, Eddie. [01:32:54.000 --> 01:32:55.000] How are you doing? [01:32:55.000 --> 01:32:56.000] I'm doing great. [01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:57.000] Okay. [01:32:57.000 --> 01:33:00.000] Well, I've never talked to you before, but I've been listening to you for a long time. [01:33:00.000 --> 01:33:01.000] I can never get through. [01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:09.000] Anyway, I know we don't have a lot of time, but I just wanted to – well, thank you, first of all, for everything that you do. [01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:19.000] And as a matter of fact, I've already used your advice and gotten out of a speeding ticket over a crossplane when I was going 25 miles over speed limits. [01:33:19.000 --> 01:33:24.000] Well, now see that right there, you've already misspoke yourself. [01:33:24.000 --> 01:33:30.000] You didn't get out of something that never had legal authority over you in the first place. [01:33:30.000 --> 01:33:31.000] Exactly. [01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:32.000] You're exactly right. [01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:40.000] Because they just let it go by the wayside because they didn't know what to do with all the complaints and everything, the counterclaim and all that. [01:33:40.000 --> 01:33:52.000] But the thing I'm working on right now, and I've been talking to a few people on Telegram about it, Alphonse and Randy and more and Andonia. [01:33:52.000 --> 01:34:05.000] And the – okay, in 2019, I got my neighbor and I – we live in a townhouse in an HOA property, and we share a wall. [01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:10.000] And she hates cats, and I have three cats for pets. [01:34:10.000 --> 01:34:23.000] And one of them, she set a trap out on her patio, which was an open patio, and we're on HOA property, and there was no trespassing signs, no gates or anything like that. [01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:29.000] Well, she set a trap on – a live trap on the property and then went to work, and she worked at night. [01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:34.000] And I've been looking for him out in the neighborhood for a couple of hours. [01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:35.000] He's paid. [01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:37.000] I mean, he's neutered, and he needs microchips and all that. [01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:40.000] He needs shots and all that. [01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:45.000] And now I went out back, and I heard him crying, so I went over there, and I saw him in the trap. [01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:51.000] And I noticed there was a stamp right there on the patio, and I know that it was somebody's video recording. [01:34:51.000 --> 01:34:56.000] So I didn't care, though, because I was scared for his life, but she hates cats. [01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:07.000] So I looked down, and I saw that it was City Trap, so she had borrowed it from City Urban Animal Services for, you know, the Trap Neuter Return Program. [01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:11.000] That's what she says she's going to do with it and have them get spayed or neutered. [01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:15.000] Well, he's already had all that kind of stuff, so – but that's the side of the point. [01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:25.000] If I didn't catch him over there, and she wouldn't even – oh, she left him unattended, then he would have – she could have taken off with him and had him discarded, had him killed or whatever. [01:35:25.000 --> 01:35:27.000] Right. [01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:37.000] Anyway, so I was scared for his life, and that was – so I went over there, got the Trap, I brought it back into my house, in my garage, shut the door, and let him out. [01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:40.000] And then I waited for the cops to come because I knew they were going to come. [01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:47.000] And so they – about an hour later, they fill up after she shows up, and he gives me a lecture. [01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:51.000] I give them the Trap and give it back, and then he gives it back to her. [01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:55.000] Well, so I thought it was over with, you know. [01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:58.000] But I have had nothing but problems for the last three years. [01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:02.000] This lady has been here, and I've been here over 21 years. [01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:04.000] And we're in a civil lawsuit right now. [01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:07.000] I've been going on for a year. [01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:15.000] But so all of a sudden, one day, about five months after that, I get two citations in the mail. [01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:21.000] Criminal trespass, attempted entry, and theft under $100. [01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:25.000] And so I am – I've been – I've already been writing the motion. [01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:30.000] I already know that they don't have – are you going to go? [01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:31.000] No, we're taking a break. [01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:32.000] So hang on just a second. [01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:35.000] Let me get the break over with, and I'll be right back. [01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:36.000] Okay. [01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:37.000] Okay. [01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:38.000] All right. [01:36:38.000 --> 01:36:42.000] Now, we need to find out who's trying to make the claims on these charges. [01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:46.000] So if you know who made the charges, tell me that on the other side. [01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:47.000] Hang on. [01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:48.000] We'll be right back. [01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:49.000] All right, folks. [01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:51.000] We're coming up in the last segment of the show. [01:36:51.000 --> 01:36:52.000] Y'all hang on. [01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:53.000] We will be right back. [01:36:53.000 --> 01:37:00.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:05.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:11.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:16.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, [01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:19.000] young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:25.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:30.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor, [01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:33.000] along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:37.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, [01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:41.000] your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:45.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:50.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, [01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:52.000] and increase your income. [01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:54.000] Order now. [01:37:54.000 --> 01:37:57.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:01.000] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, [01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:09.000] the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:13.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:17.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:22.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:28.000] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:33.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:37.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:43.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:46.000] pro se tactics, and much more. [01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:59.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:03.000] So on the day I was born, the nurses all gathered round, [01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:06.000] in a gaze and a wide wonder at the George... [01:39:06.000 --> 01:39:08.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:10.000] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:15.000] We are now in the last segment of this show, and I am talking to Jane in Texas. [01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:18.000] Jane, let's see if we can wrap this up for you. [01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:22.000] All right, so who is making the allegation of theft? [01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:25.000] Is it the city or is it this woman? [01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:26.000] It's not the woman. [01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:30.000] It's because after the officer, he turned it over to the investigator, [01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:34.000] or the investigator just happened to look at it, or maybe she pressed him or whatever. [01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:35.000] I don't know. [01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:38.000] But it's an officer who has been out here before. [01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:42.000] He's familiar with me because we've had multiple issues out here. [01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:45.000] So not that I've been... [01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:47.000] There's been nothing but problems since she's been here. [01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:49.000] But anyway, it's the city Irving. [01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:55.000] But the thing is, it's a little bit worse than that because the prosecutor who's prosecuting it, [01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:02.000] somebody had written a bar grievance on because she didn't charge my neighbor with criminal offense [01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:04.000] whenever she charged my payout. [01:40:04.000 --> 01:40:09.000] So I've got crimes that my neighbor actually committed, like cutting my internet cable and stuff like that. [01:40:09.000 --> 01:40:11.000] But the city never charged her with anything. [01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:16.000] Well, then you can move to have that prosecutor disqualified for bias. [01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:18.000] Yeah, I was going to do that. [01:40:18.000 --> 01:40:21.000] I was going to have her recuse herself or whatever because she... [01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:22.000] No, no, no, no, no. [01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:25.000] Do not give her the option of recusing herself. [01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:26.000] Okay. [01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:28.000] Okay? [01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:34.000] You move to disqualify her for bias and prejudice against you. [01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:35.000] Okay. [01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:37.000] Because she has an interest in the outcome. [01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:42.000] So, okay, I'm going to do that, but she's pretty much the one running the court. [01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:45.000] I went and sat in on the hearings of a guy who had the same... [01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:49.000] Well, she doesn't get to rule on whether or not she disqualified. [01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:51.000] She has no power to do that. [01:40:51.000 --> 01:40:52.000] Most definitely. [01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:58.000] But my thing is, okay, so now the theft, I know they have to prove intent. [01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:03.000] And I thought the city Irving is a fictitious entity. [01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:08.000] I didn't think they were someone who owns anything, especially that my neighbor had, [01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:11.000] even though they, you know... [01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:15.000] Ultimately, I do own the trap, but I didn't get charged for trespassing the trap. [01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:19.000] I got charged for trespassing on my neighbor's property. [01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:25.000] But we're in an HOA, and so it's a gray area, whether or not it's actually private or not. [01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:29.000] But I think it's because it is a patio, but, you know, the fact is there are no signs. [01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:32.000] She didn't come out there and say, get off my property, nothing like that. [01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:34.000] And the whole thing is, I didn't go over there to trespass. [01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:36.000] I went over there to rescue my cat. [01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:40.000] Well, unless they've already filed a trespass notice on you, [01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:43.000] they can't charge you with criminal trespass. [01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:47.000] In order to charge you with criminal trespass, every state law that I'm aware of, [01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:54.000] and you need to check it and make sure that's true, but here in Texas, [01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:58.000] you can't criminally trespass unless you have already been giving a trespass warning [01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:03.000] and told by a law enforcement officer that if you enter the property again, [01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:08.000] you will be committing criminal trespass. [01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:10.000] Okay, so no, I didn't do that. [01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:14.000] No, that didn't happen, but now in the front yard, it's another issue [01:42:14.000 --> 01:42:18.000] because she has her cameras trained on my front door, on my front window. [01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:23.000] And a couple of times I used my flagpole and re-aimed her camera. [01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:25.000] And so that's a totally different issue. [01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:30.000] But nobody's ever told me and given me a warning, no kind of anything like that, [01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:37.000] saying that I can't go on her property because it's a common property pretty much. [01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:39.000] Well, that's the same difference. [01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:43.000] If it's common property, then you can't be trespassed from it. [01:42:43.000 --> 01:42:47.000] You have a legitimate reason for being there. [01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:52.000] Yeah, I did it because of rescuing my cat, and I had no criminal intent at all. [01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:57.000] Well, even if your cat was not at issue here, if it's common property, [01:42:57.000 --> 01:42:59.000] you have a right to be there. [01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:03.000] But actually, it's not black and white on the common property [01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:10.000] because our declarations, which they're going to supersede what the city of Irving says anyway, [01:43:10.000 --> 01:43:18.000] but our declarations say that we can store items on our personal, on our patios, [01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:21.000] but we can't put it in a common area. [01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:27.000] So if we can store our personal items on our private patios or on our property, [01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:30.000] that means that it's not common, I think. [01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:31.000] Right? [01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:34.000] Well, that would probably be true. [01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:42.000] Yeah, so then my thing is I think I can get the trespass is the issue that I'm having because of Seth. [01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:44.000] Well, can I ask a question real quick? [01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:48.000] Why didn't you just let the cat out of the trap and leave the trap there? [01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:52.000] Because I feared for him, because I wanted to rescue him and keep him out of danger [01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:56.000] because it was just a matter of time for her to get home, and I wanted him to come and, you know, be inside. [01:43:56.000 --> 01:44:01.000] Well, but why would not letting him out of the trap and carry him inside [01:44:01.000 --> 01:44:04.000] have accomplished that without you removing the trap? [01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:11.000] Because I, because he, well, I could have maybe, because a live trap sounds like easy to get into necessarily. [01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:14.000] Anyway, you have to, you know, there are spring-loaded doors and whatever. [01:44:14.000 --> 01:44:19.000] And so, I mean, so then you're actually kind of seeing it maybe like the cops saw it. [01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:20.000] But I don't see it like that. [01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:24.000] I see that my cat's life is in danger. [01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:28.000] Well, I'm not trying to see it any particular way other than if you can, [01:44:28.000 --> 01:44:33.000] if you could remove the cat from the trap without taking the trap, [01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:36.000] that would have been a smarter move in my opinion. [01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:38.000] It would have been. It would have been. [01:44:38.000 --> 01:44:45.000] But I was, I was so, I was so ticked off and I was so, you know, worried about him. [01:44:45.000 --> 01:44:47.000] So, and I know, because I know how she is. [01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:52.000] She's out there spraying catmase in the common property, in the front yard. [01:44:52.000 --> 01:44:55.000] She's, you know, out there all the time spraying catmase and stuff. [01:44:55.000 --> 01:45:00.000] And so, but, you know, I know that was mistaken. [01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:03.000] I noticed that, but I still didn't have any criminal intent. [01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:08.000] I didn't have any intent to go steal a cage, even though that's what they're calling [01:45:08.000 --> 01:45:13.000] on the investigation done by this other officer investigator. [01:45:13.000 --> 01:45:18.000] Well, they're going to make the argument that because you picked it up [01:45:18.000 --> 01:45:22.000] and removed it from the property, that exhibits intent. [01:45:22.000 --> 01:45:24.000] Okay, but why are they charging me with it? [01:45:24.000 --> 01:45:25.000] They are not. [01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:26.000] Because it's their trap. [01:45:26.000 --> 01:45:29.000] You said it said city on it, right? [01:45:29.000 --> 01:45:31.000] Yeah, but that's not what they're saying on the, on the, [01:45:31.000 --> 01:45:36.000] they're saying they're charging me and they're not even charging me [01:45:36.000 --> 01:45:39.000] under the penal code, the 3200 or whatever it is. [01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:44.000] They're charging me, that's under $100 code number 8086, [01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:47.000] which is not a penal code. [01:45:47.000 --> 01:45:50.000] It's like one of their like traffic codes or something like that. [01:45:50.000 --> 01:45:55.000] And then they're charging me trespass attempt under code number 5606, [01:45:55.000 --> 01:45:58.000] which is not anything related to the penal code. [01:45:58.000 --> 01:46:01.000] Trespass with what? [01:46:01.000 --> 01:46:06.000] Trespass attempt, attempt entry. [01:46:06.000 --> 01:46:10.000] Well, the thing about it is in order to prove it, [01:46:10.000 --> 01:46:13.000] if you read the statute or whatever the hell it is, [01:46:13.000 --> 01:46:17.000] you'll probably find out that attempt to entry means that you tried to enter her house, [01:46:17.000 --> 01:46:19.000] not just her patio. [01:46:19.000 --> 01:46:22.000] If the patio is open, there's no attempted entry. [01:46:22.000 --> 01:46:23.000] It's open. [01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:24.000] Yeah, I know. [01:46:24.000 --> 01:46:28.000] And so that's a lie on their part because that's not, there's no way they can prove that [01:46:28.000 --> 01:46:32.000] because there's no way in the world I would even consider going in there. [01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:34.000] You know, I mean, I can't stand a woman. [01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:37.000] So I just got my catten left. [01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:41.000] Well, here's my suggestion to avoid further trouble when you do this. [01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:48.000] Since you know she's planting traps and you can see the traps from your yard, right? [01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:50.000] Well, yeah, she was. [01:46:50.000 --> 01:46:52.000] This is three years ago also. [01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:57.000] Well, okay, but still, if she does things like this and you're aware that she does it, [01:46:57.000 --> 01:47:00.000] you can see her yard from your yard, right? [01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:01.000] Yes. [01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:02.000] Okay. [01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:06.000] So all you really need is to do the same thing she does. [01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:13.000] Take, find you some cat mace that actually shoots a stream like a wasp and hornet spray does. [01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:14.000] Yeah. [01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:21.000] And whenever she puts down a trap, spray the trap from your property with that cat mace. [01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:23.000] That cat won't go anywhere near it. [01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:25.000] The salt, probably. [01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:27.000] I'll get charged with salt, probably. [01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:31.000] How are you going to get charged with a salt spraying an empty trap? [01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:33.000] I didn't say spray the woman. [01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:35.000] I said spray the trap. [01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:37.000] I know, but check this out. [01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:41.000] Every time something like she, I had a spectrum install on my internet table, [01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:45.000] I mean my internet one day, and she went out and cut it with her scissors. [01:47:45.000 --> 01:47:48.000] After I had sent her a text message and said, hey, look, they put this, [01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:51.000] you know, over your sidewalk with these little flags and they're going to come back [01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:53.000] and bury it in three days. [01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:57.000] Well, as soon as she got the message, within an hour, she went out and cut it with her scissors. [01:47:57.000 --> 01:48:01.000] And when I called the cops, and when they came out and went over to the door, [01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:03.000] I said, why the, what the heck is wrong with you? [01:48:03.000 --> 01:48:08.000] She all of a sudden started screaming the assault, and she called the cops and said that I assaulted her. [01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:10.000] Well, and that's how she does. [01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:14.000] Every time that she gives me a reason that I have to call the cops, [01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:18.000] she always makes up some kind of bullshit, which they had no evidence of it, [01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:20.000] and so they ended up having to drop it. [01:48:20.000 --> 01:48:24.000] So, because they couldn't, but they have referred to this, you know, it's just been a lot, [01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:30.000] there's been, I've got a very big stack, thick stacks of other times [01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:34.000] that police have been out here for one thing or another. [01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:40.000] But before she moved in, in 2018, and since 2001, I have never called the cops, [01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:42.000] and they've never been out here for anything. [01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:45.000] Since she's been here, they're out here three times a month. [01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:49.000] Okay, well, what exactly is your question in relation to all this? [01:48:49.000 --> 01:48:55.000] Well, I was thinking that you probably knew that the theft, [01:48:55.000 --> 01:48:59.000] and just don't even think about the park that would be in the city trap. [01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:02.000] I mean, just act like that wasn't a city trap. [01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:12.000] Theft is not something that they can bring on me whenever it's not their property that I'm stealing. [01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:13.000] Right? [01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:14.000] Well, that's true. [01:49:14.000 --> 01:49:19.000] But that's why I said we have to determine who is making the charge of theft. [01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:22.000] If it's not the woman, then it's the city. [01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:25.000] If the city is the one that owned the trap, [01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:30.000] then they would have standing to bring that charge because they issued the trap to her. [01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:34.000] She didn't own it. I doubt that she bought it from them. [01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:35.000] No. [01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:37.000] They actually put it out there. [01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:41.000] One of their people put it out there and was planning on collecting it. [01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:43.000] No, she wouldn't pick it up at Animal Services. [01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:48.000] Believe me, I've done it before, and I even have a trap, and they're only like $35 or whatever. [01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:51.000] Do you have to buy them or do you rent them? [01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:52.000] No, you don't even rent them. [01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:57.000] They loan them to you, and then if you lose it or something happens to it, then you got to pay like $50. [01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:04.000] Okay, same difference. They're the owner unless you claim you lost it and buy it by paying for it. [01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:10.000] Okay, so then you're saying that they're going to say that I stole the city trap off of my neighbor's patio. [01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:14.000] That's most likely exactly what they're going to try to say. [01:50:14.000 --> 01:50:18.000] But don't you have to have intent or is that the only? [01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:26.000] Well, I told you the moment you picked it up and removed it, they will show intent. [01:50:26.000 --> 01:50:33.000] That was the whole purpose of my question of asking why didn't you just take the cat out of it and leave it? [01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:36.000] I know, but it's too late for that, so then what about? [01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:40.000] Well, I understand that, but I'm trying to get you to understand the perspective here. [01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:41.000] Yeah. [01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:42.000] Okay. [01:50:42.000 --> 01:50:44.000] We had a necessity. [01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:50.000] Well, there was no necessity in taking the trap if you could open it and get the cat out. [01:50:50.000 --> 01:50:54.000] It's not as easy as like, you know. [01:50:54.000 --> 01:50:59.000] Well, easy or not, that's the perspective they're going to approach this with. [01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:05.000] Okay, but I don't see why, if I'm rescue, I don't see why it could still be theft, though, you know. [01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:10.000] I mean, I gave the trap right back to them. If they wouldn't have showed up, I would have had, I would have taken it over there. [01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:13.000] You know what I'm saying? I borrowed it. [01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:20.000] Well, taking it without permission is all that's required for it to be theft, whether you gave it back after the fact or not. [01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:22.000] That's the problem. [01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:28.000] All right, my dear, I'm sorry, but I'm out of time, so I appreciate the call and hope it'll give you something to think about, okay? [01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:31.000] Okay. All right. Thank you. All right. Bye-bye. [01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:39.000] You're welcome. All right. All you other callers, I'm sorry I wasn't able to get to you, but y'all have a great week, good night, and God bless and thanks for listening in and for calling. [01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:44.000] Y'all have a great night and a great week. [01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:52.000] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:51:52.000 --> 01:52:02.000] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:05.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:14.000] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:24.000] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:26.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:34.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:52:34.000 --> 01:52:43.000] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:52:43.000 --> 01:53:05.000] Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.