[00:00.000 --> 00:05.800]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.800 --> 00:09.480]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.480 --> 00:10.920]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.920 --> 00:14.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.880 --> 00:17.000]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:17.000 --> 00:18.580]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.580 --> 00:22.200]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.200 --> 00:26.960]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.960 --> 00:32.040]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.040 --> 00:34.720]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.720 --> 00:39.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:39.000 --> 00:42.560]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.560 --> 00:44.760]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:44.760 --> 00:47.840]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.840 --> 00:50.800]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:50.800 --> 00:54.520]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.520 --> 01:01.600]  Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly,
[01:01.600 --> 01:02.960]  and R for religion.
[01:02.960 --> 01:07.040]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:07.040 --> 01:10.480]  assembly, and religion, but petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.480 --> 01:14.640]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.640 --> 01:18.160]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:18.160 --> 01:20.840]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.840 --> 01:31.080]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.080 --> 01:34.760]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.760 --> 01:38.200]  They guarantee a specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.200 --> 01:39.680]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.680 --> 01:43.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.560 --> 01:46.720]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.720 --> 01:48.280]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.280 --> 01:51.920]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.920 --> 01:56.680]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.680 --> 02:01.800]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.800 --> 02:04.440]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.440 --> 02:08.720]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.720 --> 02:12.280]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.280 --> 02:15.840]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:15.840 --> 02:20.200]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.200 --> 02:22.280]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.280 --> 02:26.760]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[02:26.760 --> 02:30.600]  that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.600 --> 02:31.600]  Get it?
[02:31.600 --> 02:33.920]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:33.920 --> 02:37.520]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.520 --> 02:43.280]  when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary
[02:43.280 --> 02:47.600]  government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America
[02:47.600 --> 02:50.480]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:50.480 --> 02:52.480]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:52.480 --> 03:14.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:14.000 --> 03:26.320]  Thank you.
[03:44.000 --> 03:53.800]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheels of Our Radio on this Friday, the 21st
[03:53.800 --> 03:56.960]  day of January 2022.
[03:56.960 --> 04:04.040]  So this is the 21st of the 21st century.
[04:04.040 --> 04:07.960]  Oh well, I'm confused.
[04:07.960 --> 04:18.760]  We're talking to Iona in Rhode Island, and so go ahead and bar-grieve them, that'll get
[04:18.760 --> 04:22.880]  their attention.
[04:22.880 --> 04:27.760]  Request all these records, and when you get the records, send them to me, and then call
[04:27.760 --> 04:30.680]  back in next week and we'll talk about this.
[04:30.680 --> 04:38.640]  Okay, so just to clarify, I'm going to bar-grieve him before even requesting the records, and
[04:38.640 --> 04:44.880]  when he sent me the email saying that I just got the package today, do I bar-grieve the
[04:44.880 --> 04:48.600]  lawyer that built the truck as well or just him?
[04:48.600 --> 04:59.160]  Well, I really like bar-grieving, but it would probably be more effective from his perspective
[04:59.160 --> 05:10.840]  if you request these records and give him a few days to drag his feet and then bar-grieve
[05:10.840 --> 05:15.880]  him for not getting you the records.
[05:15.880 --> 05:21.880]  That way it's not like you just bar-grieved him just to be bar-grieving him.
[05:21.880 --> 05:26.120]  You did, but you don't want him to know that yet.
[05:26.120 --> 05:29.400]  Make him think you're really impatient.
[05:29.400 --> 05:35.480]  Okay, so just basically, after the records, what if he produces them in two days, then
[05:35.480 --> 05:38.320]  how do I bar-grieve them?
[05:38.320 --> 05:39.320]  Then don't yet.
[05:39.320 --> 05:40.320]  Okay.
[05:40.320 --> 05:46.040]  If he produces those records very quickly, then he may actually be doing his job and
[05:46.040 --> 05:53.200]  doing it right, and while I really like to bar-grieve lawyers, if we get one that's actually
[05:53.200 --> 05:57.840]  doing something right, then we don't want to hammer them for doing it right.
[05:57.840 --> 05:58.840]  Right.
[05:58.840 --> 06:05.960]  So, if you have a real compulsion to bar-grieve somebody, bar-grieve the lawyer on the other
[06:05.960 --> 06:06.960]  side.
[06:06.960 --> 06:07.960]  Right, right.
[06:07.960 --> 06:16.640]  The second question is that, wouldn't I want to bar-grieve him for supposedly working on
[06:16.640 --> 06:19.040]  a truck for almost a year since last spring?
[06:19.040 --> 06:20.040]  You know what I mean?
[06:20.040 --> 06:25.320]  Does that mean that I say, it's okay, you settled by saying, let me have the records?
[06:25.320 --> 06:28.680]  Does that mean you say, that's okay, you settled?
[06:28.680 --> 06:32.200]  No, it's two separate issues, two separate things.
[06:32.200 --> 06:36.800]  One is you're asking for the records, and the other is that he's not doing what he said
[06:36.800 --> 06:43.180]  he was going to do, or he's... Who knows what's going on with that about the trust?
[06:43.180 --> 06:44.840]  We need to see your records.
[06:44.840 --> 06:47.280]  We need to see your documentation first.
[06:47.280 --> 06:53.840]  Is there a guardian ad litem, since they're claiming brain damage for you, or they're
[06:53.840 --> 06:58.800]  trying to make you incompetent so they can take over your affairs?
[06:58.800 --> 07:01.960]  We need to find out what's really going on.
[07:01.960 --> 07:06.960]  Yeah, all right, they didn't claim that, but that's what I said to him, and he said, what's
[07:06.960 --> 07:07.960]  your point?
[07:07.960 --> 07:10.960]  I said, you know, he just asked me what my point was.
[07:10.960 --> 07:15.200]  I was like, brain injury is 250 grand settlement.
[07:15.200 --> 07:17.560]  You've been waiting 10 years for a settlement.
[07:17.560 --> 07:18.560]  That's your point.
[07:18.560 --> 07:19.560]  Yeah.
[07:19.560 --> 07:20.560]  Yeah.
[07:20.560 --> 07:21.560]  Whereas, you know, what are you guys doing?
[07:21.560 --> 07:22.560]  You're going to wait until I die?
[07:22.560 --> 07:23.560]  I said, get it done.
[07:23.560 --> 07:24.560]  Yeah.
[07:24.560 --> 07:32.560]  That'd be a good reason to bar-grieve him, been waiting for 10 years for him to settle
[07:32.560 --> 07:33.560]  a case.
[07:33.560 --> 07:37.640]  Bar-grieve him for that, if you're annoyed with him.
[07:37.640 --> 07:43.920]  If you think he may actually be conducting himself appropriately, then I wouldn't bar-grieve
[07:43.920 --> 07:45.280]  him.
[07:45.280 --> 07:47.600]  Yeah, I'm not sure.
[07:47.600 --> 07:52.120]  I guess I was told that, you know, appropriate is you wait for a lawyer, so I don't know
[07:52.120 --> 07:54.840]  what appropriate is anymore, you know?
[07:54.840 --> 08:00.560]  Well, if you ask him for these records and he gives them to you, then send them to me
[08:00.560 --> 08:05.400]  and I'll look at them, and if I find they're not complete, then you bar-grieve him.
[08:05.400 --> 08:06.400]  Right.
[08:06.400 --> 08:07.400]  What's your email?
[08:07.400 --> 08:15.960]  But if he gives complete records, let me look at them first, and if you actually have a
[08:15.960 --> 08:21.400]  lawyer that's actually working in your best interest, you might not want to screw that
[08:21.400 --> 08:22.400]  up.
[08:22.400 --> 08:30.520]  I know that's very unlikely, but it's possible.
[08:30.520 --> 08:31.920]  Yeah.
[08:31.920 --> 08:35.400]  There actually are some lawyers out there who are human beings.
[08:35.400 --> 08:44.040]  We've got Dr. Graves, who does jurisdiction area, and he is actually a moral human being.
[08:44.040 --> 08:45.040]  Yeah.
[08:45.040 --> 08:52.040]  So if we have one, we don't want to ruin that.
[08:52.040 --> 08:56.760]  So ask him for the records, give him a chance to screw up, and then we're hammering.
[08:56.760 --> 08:57.760]  Okay.
[08:57.760 --> 08:58.760]  All right.
[08:58.760 --> 09:01.000]  Yeah, I feel like he signed without me.
[09:01.000 --> 09:05.160]  That's a huge thing, but we don't know for sure until we look at the copy of the case,
[09:05.160 --> 09:06.160]  right?
[09:06.160 --> 09:07.160]  Yes.
[09:07.160 --> 09:08.160]  We need to understand what's going on.
[09:08.160 --> 09:11.920]  So get that, then call us next week.
[09:11.920 --> 09:14.920]  And what's your email?
[09:14.920 --> 09:24.640]  Randy, r-a-n-d-y, at, rule, r-u-l-e, of, law, radio, dot com.
[09:24.640 --> 09:25.640]  Thank you so much.
[09:25.640 --> 09:26.640]  Okay.
[09:26.640 --> 09:29.640]  And I look forward to hearing from you next week.
[09:29.640 --> 09:30.640]  Cheers.
[09:30.640 --> 09:31.640]  Okay.
[09:31.640 --> 09:35.360]  And do you know how to listen live?
[09:35.360 --> 09:36.360]  Yeah.
[09:36.360 --> 09:39.760]  I'm listening live right now on my computer.
[09:39.760 --> 09:40.760]  Okay.
[09:40.760 --> 09:45.920]  Now, this is our call-in line, so you have to drop off of it, because it'll tie up our
[09:45.920 --> 09:46.920]  cardboard.
[09:46.920 --> 09:49.800]  But drop off here and then go to the listen live.
[09:49.800 --> 09:51.400]  You want to listen to Ted.
[09:51.400 --> 09:52.400]  Right.
[09:52.400 --> 09:53.400]  Okay.
[09:53.400 --> 09:56.720]  She's saying she's listening on the computer, so she's streaming.
[09:56.720 --> 09:57.720]  Oh, okay.
[09:57.720 --> 09:58.720]  Okay.
[09:58.720 --> 10:02.000]  Then, yeah, then you're going to want to listen to Ted.
[10:02.000 --> 10:04.000]  Ted has been in the trenches.
[10:04.000 --> 10:05.000]  Okay.
[10:05.000 --> 10:08.000]  I look forward to hearing from you next week.
[10:08.000 --> 10:09.000]  Okay.
[10:09.000 --> 10:10.000]  Thank you so much.
[10:10.000 --> 10:11.000]  Okay.
[10:11.000 --> 10:12.000]  Bye.
[10:12.000 --> 10:13.000]  Okay, Ted.
[10:13.000 --> 10:14.800]  What is...
[10:14.800 --> 10:16.800]  What's going on with you now?
[10:16.800 --> 10:23.120]  Well, I've been regrouping and getting things organized.
[10:23.120 --> 10:27.600]  You...
[10:27.600 --> 10:28.600]  What happened?
[10:28.600 --> 10:29.600]  Oops.
[10:29.600 --> 10:30.600]  Did we lose Ted?
[10:30.600 --> 10:31.600]  No.
[10:31.600 --> 10:32.600]  Well, not exactly.
[10:32.600 --> 10:37.840]  I was going to mute myself, so I didn't make any background noise, and I kind of accidentally
[10:37.840 --> 10:40.840]  muted Ted.
[10:40.840 --> 10:42.840]  I'm in my dotage.
[10:42.840 --> 10:43.840]  Okay.
[10:43.840 --> 10:46.840]  I'm getting old and feeble-minded.
[10:46.840 --> 10:47.840]  Okay.
[10:47.840 --> 10:48.840]  I'm sorry.
[10:48.840 --> 10:49.840]  Go ahead, Ted.
[10:49.840 --> 10:52.760]  Well, Randy, first thing, I got a complaint.
[10:52.760 --> 10:56.720]  I was just about to throw back a shot.
[10:56.720 --> 11:00.520]  When I'm listening to you in the background on my computer saying, Ted, you need to call
[11:00.520 --> 11:14.040]  back in here, Todd, now you know I got a strong mind because I dropped my elbow and put that
[11:14.040 --> 11:20.160]  shot glass back on the sink there, and so I have to save this until after I get on the
[11:20.160 --> 11:21.160]  sink.
[11:21.160 --> 11:22.160]  Okay.
[11:22.160 --> 11:23.160]  I appreciate that.
[11:23.160 --> 11:38.000]  Good evening, Dr. Kelton and Brett, and let's not leave out Debra, so again, thanks.
[11:38.000 --> 11:41.240]  Thank all of you for everything that you do.
[11:41.240 --> 11:46.360]  What's going on is this criminal case of mine is still ongoing.
[11:46.360 --> 11:53.600]  It's now, I can call it seven years because on February 11th, it will be the seven-year
[11:53.600 --> 12:00.920]  mark, and my next court appearance is on February 14th, but I'm sure they're not going to show
[12:00.920 --> 12:01.920]  me any love.
[12:01.920 --> 12:05.360]  That is Valentine's Day.
[12:05.360 --> 12:13.000]  What happened at the last court appearance is the public defender got up and said that
[12:13.000 --> 12:20.320]  the public defender's office has a conflict of interest, and the judge didn't miss the
[12:20.320 --> 12:27.200]  beat because the new guy, Patrick Coughlin, jumped up and said, I'm here to take over
[12:27.200 --> 12:32.160]  this case, and the judge promptly appointed this guy.
[12:32.160 --> 12:42.960]  Of course, I'm against my objections, and what happened after the hearing was that the
[12:42.960 --> 12:48.960]  new lawyer, by the way, you have the public defender's office, and you have the alternate
[12:48.960 --> 12:54.000]  defender's office, and then you have the independent defender.
[12:54.000 --> 12:59.720]  The independent defender's office is basically private lawyers looking for business that
[12:59.720 --> 13:06.960]  put their names in or submit their names to the public defender's office.
[13:06.960 --> 13:15.560]  Why I bring this up is because it took me some time to think about it, but I realized
[13:15.560 --> 13:23.400]  because I am suing the public defender and the deputy public defender Howard Goldman,
[13:23.400 --> 13:29.960]  that Patrick Coughlin, who is an independent defender, he still has a conflict of interest
[13:29.960 --> 13:36.920]  because the public defender's office is the one that's going to pay him to supposedly
[13:36.920 --> 13:44.360]  represent me, and I'm suing the public defender, so there's a conflict of interest there, anybody
[13:44.360 --> 13:45.360]  would know that.
[13:45.360 --> 13:55.960]  I think what's gone on here is they've never had a situation like me, and so they didn't
[13:55.960 --> 13:57.880]  really think this through.
[13:57.880 --> 14:04.240]  When I say they, I mean the judge, the public defender, and this new lawyer that they brought
[14:04.240 --> 14:12.120]  in because they're all in it together, and I've thought about it, and it was like they
[14:12.120 --> 14:17.200]  had already rehearsed this last hearing that went down.
[14:17.200 --> 14:26.640]  Subsequent to that, I got a letter from this new lawyer, Patrick Coughlin, and it wasn't
[14:26.640 --> 14:40.880]  dated, and it wasn't signed, so then he also bothered me, and so he called me and bothered
[14:40.880 --> 14:44.880]  me, and it was a stressful time.
[14:44.880 --> 14:52.360]  A friend of mine passed away, and my brother had a stroke and is bedridden, and so all
[14:52.360 --> 14:59.760]  of that, and all of a sudden this guy's basically, I'm taking it as harassing, it's harassing.
[14:59.760 --> 15:05.240]  He's calling me, he had a private investigator call me, he sent me this letter, I developed
[15:05.240 --> 15:15.800]  sores all over my forearm, and so I wrote him a letter back, and basically it's regarding
[15:15.800 --> 15:22.080]  his unsigned, undated letter, and I just say, dear Mr. Coughlin, you appear to be under
[15:22.080 --> 15:25.320]  the false presumption that you represent me.
[15:25.320 --> 15:31.000]  This letter is to make clear to you that you do not represent me, I have never requested
[15:31.000 --> 15:36.360]  your services, we do not have a written signed contract, and we certainly have no meeting
[15:36.360 --> 15:38.000]  of the mind.
[15:38.000 --> 15:43.480]  I am in litigation with Santa Clara County Public Defender, and at this time one of their
[15:43.480 --> 15:54.040]  deputy public defenders, case number 19CB360335, this fact creates a conflict of interest for
[15:54.040 --> 16:00.960]  you and a bar to your attempt to insert yourself in my ongoing legal matters.
[16:00.960 --> 16:06.040]  As you have consumed my time and caused me distress, I request that you respond back
[16:06.040 --> 16:11.640]  to me in writing a written acknowledgement that your employment with Santa Clara County
[16:11.640 --> 16:16.680]  Public Defender and my lawsuit against the public defender over the incident case creates
[16:16.680 --> 16:18.960]  a conflict of interest for you.
[16:18.960 --> 16:21.600]  Please respond in writing within five days.
[16:21.600 --> 16:29.840]  Further, I regard your attempts to force yourself on me as an interference with several of my
[16:29.840 --> 16:31.840]  constitutional rights.
[16:31.840 --> 16:32.840]  Regards.
[16:32.840 --> 16:33.840]  Jerry.
[16:33.840 --> 16:41.600]  I haven't responded to that, yeah, I haven't responded to that, and so the next thing
[16:41.600 --> 16:42.600]  I'm going to do...
[16:42.600 --> 16:43.600]  Well, of course he hasn't responded.
[16:43.600 --> 16:44.600]  He's still reeling.
[16:44.600 --> 16:55.120]  Well, hang on, we're about to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule our radio.
[16:55.120 --> 17:00.120]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.120 --> 17:04.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[17:04.880 --> 17:08.920]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[17:08.920 --> 17:13.240]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[17:13.240 --> 17:14.240]  can win two.
[17:14.240 --> 17:19.040]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:19.040 --> 17:24.840]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[17:24.840 --> 17:29.480]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[17:29.480 --> 17:33.680]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.680 --> 17:38.800]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:38.800 --> 17:40.720]  Additional consultation is available as well.
[17:40.720 --> 17:46.560]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[17:46.560 --> 17:49.440]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[17:49.440 --> 17:58.440]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-m at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[17:58.440 --> 18:01.440]  collectors now.
[18:01.440 --> 18:04.520]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[18:04.520 --> 18:08.120]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society, and if we the people are ever
[18:08.120 --> 18:12.200]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.200 --> 18:15.520]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[18:15.520 --> 18:19.240]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[18:19.240 --> 18:23.400]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:23.400 --> 18:24.880]  our rights through due process.
[18:24.880 --> 18:28.360]  Former Sheriff's Deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put
[18:28.360 --> 18:31.920]  together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what
[18:31.920 --> 18:34.920]  due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[18:34.920 --> 18:38.920]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[18:38.920 --> 18:40.280]  ordering your copy today.
[18:40.280 --> 18:43.640]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:43.640 --> 18:48.040]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[18:48.040 --> 18:50.360]  documents, and other useful resource material.
[18:50.360 --> 18:54.320]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:54.320 --> 18:59.320]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[18:59.320 --> 19:08.320]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosradioNetwork.com.
[19:08.320 --> 19:17.320]  Well, don't let nothing get to you, only the Father can deliver you.
[19:17.320 --> 19:23.320]  Don't let bad-minded people hurt you until they can get behind you.
[19:23.320 --> 19:33.320]  You know what I mean, my friend?
[19:33.320 --> 19:55.320]  You know what I mean, my friend?
[19:55.320 --> 20:01.320]  You know what I mean, my friend?
[20:01.320 --> 20:09.320]  You know what I mean, my friend?
[20:09.320 --> 20:17.320]  You know what I mean, my friend?
[20:17.320 --> 20:39.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, We Love Radio, and we're talking to Ted in
[20:39.000 --> 20:45.400]  California. And Ted is just kind of pussyfooting around these guys. I don't know why you don't
[20:45.400 --> 20:51.720]  tell him what he really thinks. I think that's great, Ted. The way you write that, that's
[20:51.720 --> 20:59.840]  your style. I love it. It's just excellent. I don't know. I thought it was very professional
[20:59.840 --> 21:09.080]  and to the point. That's what was good about it. He's not seeing some two-bit ignorant
[21:09.080 --> 21:16.280]  pro se here. If this lawyer has any sense at all, he's going to realize that he has
[21:16.280 --> 21:24.400]  got a hold of something he wants to let go of and get the heck out of here. And furthermore.
[21:24.400 --> 21:31.440]  But he's a lawyer and lawyers tend to think that only lawyers can think that everybody
[21:31.440 --> 21:40.040]  else is ignorant and we can manipulate anybody into anything we want. And they got someone
[21:40.040 --> 21:49.760]  in a seven-year criminal case that shouldn't have lasted two days. Ted, when are you going
[21:49.760 --> 21:57.680]  to start sticking the feds on? Well, that's the thing, Randy. I'm regrouping right now.
[21:57.680 --> 22:12.560]  Honestly, I'm tipped off at myself. The last two weeks, I just can't find the mojo. Again,
[22:12.560 --> 22:19.800]  I was tied up with family matters and I took the time out to be at my brother's bedside
[22:19.800 --> 22:30.520]  every day for, I don't know, about six weeks there. And I got him somewhat stabilized and
[22:30.520 --> 22:43.280]  I thought that I'm back to my stuff. But I found myself very run down from that. Plus,
[22:43.280 --> 22:50.200]  I keep kind of shaking my head that these guys, the district attorney here, have continued
[22:50.200 --> 23:01.720]  with this. And I think like the previous caller, they were hoping I'd die. And for the public
[23:01.720 --> 23:10.040]  defender on his way out, the last thing that he did was to say it and scream it on the
[23:10.040 --> 23:16.720]  sidewalk out in front of the main jail and courthouse, why don't I have another heart
[23:16.720 --> 23:24.360]  attack and die? And that was his response to me because I told him, I know you had secret
[23:24.360 --> 23:33.680]  meetings behind my back. Wait a minute. I have a question. To your knowledge, is champerty
[23:33.680 --> 23:45.280]  and maintenance illegal in California? Can you sell your claim in California?
[23:45.280 --> 23:51.160]  Absolutely. Oh my goodness.
[23:51.160 --> 23:56.280]  It's my understanding that you absolutely can in California.
[23:56.280 --> 24:11.720]  We need to look at that. We need to find someone who can stand in that position. Quit claim
[24:11.720 --> 24:23.760]  someone 1% of your claim. And that gives them standing to step in and adjudicate the claim
[24:23.760 --> 24:28.040]  so that if anything happens to you, it doesn't make any difference.
[24:28.040 --> 24:35.640]  I'm smiling here because you shouldn't have said that because you're the first person
[24:35.640 --> 24:41.760]  to come to mind.
[24:41.760 --> 24:46.600]  Well that might not be a bad idea.
[24:46.600 --> 24:50.880]  Well I think it's an excellent idea just in case something does happen to me. I do want
[24:50.880 --> 24:56.760]  to get on to some of the serious things here. Brett brought up before and we've talked about
[24:56.760 --> 25:03.720]  because my plan right now, there's a criminal case here, but there's other moving parts
[25:03.720 --> 25:17.080]  and it all come out of, all started from my home of 32 years. The one thing that you talked
[25:17.080 --> 25:24.400]  about, a RICO or how when you start a RICO or something like that, you're able to go
[25:24.400 --> 25:27.600]  right to deposition.
[25:27.600 --> 25:40.200]  Oh no, no. It's not RICO that gets you straight to discovery. It is a declaratory judgment.
[25:40.200 --> 25:51.120]  Claim for declaratory judgment does not involve a claim for damages. And because of that nobody
[25:51.120 --> 26:00.480]  can be harmed. And they're immune to 12b6. So you get straight to discovery and that's
[26:00.480 --> 26:02.840]  what they want to avoid.
[26:02.840 --> 26:09.880]  Okay. I did something like that a long time ago. It wasn't exactly. So it's a petition
[26:09.880 --> 26:18.000]  for the declaratory judgment. Actually, I think I did do one, but okay. So there's that.
[26:18.000 --> 26:24.920]  Now I want to bargain this new lawyer just because he hasn't responded to this letter
[26:24.920 --> 26:32.760]  and I gave him five days and I sent the letter to him, mailed it to him on January 11th.
[26:32.760 --> 26:35.160]  So and he's right here in San Jose.
[26:35.160 --> 26:43.080]  Well, instead of a bar grievance, why don't you send him a tort letter?
[26:43.080 --> 26:45.400]  I like that a lot better.
[26:45.400 --> 26:54.040]  Yeah. And Mary Krennic in Austin, she was working for a parking lot company on the airport
[26:54.040 --> 26:59.440]  and some guy came up and he's got luggage in both hands and he's got a ticket in his
[26:59.440 --> 27:03.520]  mouth and he tries to get her to take the ticket in his mouth because his hands are
[27:03.520 --> 27:13.040]  up and she wouldn't touch it. And they fired her for that. And she sued him. And now it's
[27:13.040 --> 27:22.040]  been like two weeks and already they're wanting to make a deal. Let's sue him.
[27:22.040 --> 27:23.040]  Okay.
[27:23.040 --> 27:31.680]  Sue this lawyer. And he's going to want to get this off his record. He's going to want
[27:31.680 --> 27:38.120]  his errors and emissions people to pay it. This guy's going to have errors and emissions
[27:38.120 --> 27:43.480]  because he's working for the county. You know, the county has hired him. He has to have errors
[27:43.480 --> 27:50.080]  and emissions for them to hire him. So sue him. They might give you a bunch of funds
[27:50.080 --> 27:52.760]  to get you to drop the suit against him.
[27:52.760 --> 27:58.320]  Okay. And I told him, I told him, I go, look, you know, I sued the public defender and I
[27:58.320 --> 28:02.680]  said, and I'll sue you too. I looked him right in his face and I looked him right in the
[28:02.680 --> 28:08.640]  eyes and I said, and I'll sue you too. I said, stay out of my way. I don't, I don't,
[28:08.640 --> 28:16.800]  I appreciate your offer, but I don't want your help. And you heard what I told the judge.
[28:16.800 --> 28:22.800]  So I'm giving, I'm warning you right now. So I warned him back in December.
[28:22.800 --> 28:27.080]  Okay. Write me 1% of your case.
[28:27.080 --> 28:31.520]  Okay. And I'll send them, give me the documents
[28:31.520 --> 28:36.400]  you want them to have and I'll send them to them. And they're going to go on the internet
[28:36.400 --> 28:41.440]  and say, who is this guy? And they look me up and they are not going to like what they
[28:41.440 --> 28:47.080]  find. Yep.
[28:47.080 --> 28:51.120]  That may be what you need. You need a third party unit over.
[28:51.120 --> 28:55.840]  Yeah, that's, maybe they're not going to like what they find because beauty's in the eye
[28:55.840 --> 28:59.360]  of the beholder, Randy.
[28:59.360 --> 29:05.960]  Well, that may be a way to get them off the dime.
[29:05.960 --> 29:13.520]  Okay. And then Brett back, you know, I have the civil lawsuit against the public defender's
[29:13.520 --> 29:23.240]  office was dismissed on a demurrer. And the judge that was hearing it, I'd already disqualified
[29:23.240 --> 29:26.760]  her for cause because she's receiving money from the county. I told her she couldn't hear
[29:26.760 --> 29:33.520]  a case involving the county and she ignored it and ultimately dismissed. And so I've appealed
[29:33.520 --> 29:40.440]  that and I'm in the sixth. And so when we come back from the break, I want to, you mentioned
[29:40.440 --> 29:50.520]  before about getting an investigation on these judges so that they can't be involved.
[29:50.520 --> 29:56.320]  This needs to move out to the feds. Hang on. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue La Radio,
[29:56.320 --> 30:01.120]  a call in number. Ah, forget that. Out of time.
[30:01.120 --> 30:05.560]  Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk
[30:05.560 --> 30:09.800]  could predict how long you're going to live. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back
[30:09.800 --> 30:14.600]  to tell you more about walking prognostication in just a moment.
[30:14.600 --> 30:18.960]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[30:18.960 --> 30:24.560]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:24.560 --> 30:30.160]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[30:30.160 --> 30:35.880]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by startpage.com,
[30:35.880 --> 30:43.440]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:43.440 --> 30:47.880]  New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live. The
[30:47.880 --> 30:52.480]  Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter
[30:52.480 --> 30:57.720]  per second or faster live longer than expected. In case you're wondering, one meter per second
[30:57.720 --> 31:02.720]  is about two and a quarter miles per hour. A senior's age, gender and walking speed were
[31:02.720 --> 31:07.520]  as good at predicting life expectancy as more traditional statistical measures. Generally
[31:07.520 --> 31:12.960]  speaking, faster walkers live longer. Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive. It
[31:12.960 --> 31:17.320]  only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk in a few minutes. Researchers say it could
[31:17.320 --> 31:22.840]  help doctors identify older patients who need special care. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:22.840 --> 31:30.320]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.320 --> 31:35.720]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11th, 2001. Most people don't
[31:35.720 --> 31:41.440]  know that a third tower fell on September 11th. World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper
[31:41.440 --> 31:46.040]  was not hit by a plane. Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building
[31:46.040 --> 31:51.400]  7, over 1,200 architects and engineers looked into the evidence and believed there is more
[31:51.400 --> 31:57.560]  to the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. Go to buildingwatch.org
[31:57.560 --> 32:01.480]  why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.480 --> 32:05.920]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[32:05.920 --> 32:11.480]  Word? Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time
[32:11.480 --> 32:16.400]  for Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2nd
[32:16.400 --> 32:21.880]  Timothy 2.15. Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be
[32:21.880 --> 32:27.480]  ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies
[32:27.480 --> 32:32.640]  are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message.
[32:32.640 --> 32:37.280]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[32:37.280 --> 32:42.160]  and Christian character development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to
[32:42.160 --> 32:47.400]  all those with a hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves
[32:47.400 --> 32:52.640]  more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus. So tune in to Scripture Talk live on
[32:52.640 --> 32:58.720]  LogosRadioNetwork.com, Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies
[32:58.720 --> 33:00.920]  of the Scriptures.
[33:00.920 --> 33:07.680]  Live, free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:07.680 --> 33:28.680]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Ted
[33:28.680 --> 33:39.240]  in California. Ted, we need to talk off the show. I think it's time that we started shaking
[33:39.240 --> 33:42.040]  these guys up.
[33:42.040 --> 33:45.520]  Definitely.
[33:45.520 --> 33:52.680]  Write me one percent, and then I can start using this show and the notoriety of the show.
[33:52.680 --> 33:58.400]  The first thing they'll do is I'll send them something, and they're going to say,
[33:58.400 --> 34:05.080]  who the heck is this guy? Then they're going to look me up. They're going to find all this
[34:05.080 --> 34:15.080]  nasty stuff about me. This is really scurrilous stuff. I mean, it's awful. The problem with
[34:15.080 --> 34:23.800]  all of it is most of it's true. What it'll do is I'm out of state, so I'm out of the
[34:23.800 --> 34:34.520]  reach. I've used this before, and it's been very effective. It may be a way to get them
[34:34.520 --> 34:38.320]  off the dime, because now I'm a third-party interloper, and they've got no way to control
[34:38.320 --> 34:40.560]  me.
[34:40.560 --> 34:51.120]  They look me up. If they call to find out about me, I went into the town north of me,
[34:51.120 --> 34:56.840]  the county seat, Decatur, Texas, and went to talk to the chief of police there. He said,
[34:56.840 --> 35:02.600]  Randy, what were you doing in Wichita Falls? That's about 100 miles away. I said, how did
[35:02.600 --> 35:08.360]  you know I was in Wichita Falls? Well, I got a call from the chief of police. Oh, well,
[35:08.360 --> 35:14.760]  what do you want? You see, he wouldn't know if you were crazy. Well, Rex, what'd you tell
[35:14.760 --> 35:22.360]  him? Oh, yeah, he's crazy. But if he tells you something about law, pay attention. He
[35:22.360 --> 35:32.560]  does his homework. And I said, that'll work for me. That's the kind of reputation I got.
[35:32.560 --> 35:41.680]  If they call here about me, if they call Decatur, the county seat where I live, they're going
[35:41.680 --> 35:47.880]  to tell them I just sued them for $400 million. I filed criminal charges against the district
[35:47.880 --> 35:51.400]  attorney when he first got into office.
[35:51.400 --> 36:00.320]  They got the governor to drop all of his executive orders. I'm getting a reputation of really
[36:00.320 --> 36:09.560]  being a scoundrel. And now the problem with me is, Brad and I were sitting in front of
[36:09.560 --> 36:17.760]  a microphone and a computer screen. You know, we're not in some big fancy studio, but they
[36:17.760 --> 36:26.720]  don't know that. We're sitting in front of this computer screen and talking to a microphone
[36:26.720 --> 36:34.000]  to we don't know how many people. And those guys don't know how many people are listening
[36:34.000 --> 36:43.120]  to us looking at them. I have called judges around the country and got them to do all
[36:43.120 --> 36:50.800]  kinds of stuff. The woman in Minnesota, the judge, couldn't get a continuance to get a
[36:50.800 --> 36:58.880]  lawyer. And I called the judge's coordinator and told him that I wanted to do a YouTube
[36:58.880 --> 37:03.440]  interview with a judge. I understand we've got a judge up there who's trying to murder
[37:03.440 --> 37:11.760]  this woman who's sick with cancer by forcing her to represent herself in court in her divorce
[37:11.760 --> 37:18.560]  case against her rich husband. And the coordinator said, oh, I don't think the judge is doing
[37:18.560 --> 37:26.000]  that. And I said, well, who cares? Doesn't matter. This is a great story.
[37:26.000 --> 37:31.880]  The next Monday, she come into court and said the judge charged into the courtroom, grabbed
[37:31.880 --> 37:38.960]  the gavel and said, 60 day continuance. And he pointed at her, you have a lawyer. When
[37:38.960 --> 37:52.840]  you come back, bam, slam down the gavel and ran out of the courtroom. It's all about image.
[37:52.840 --> 38:00.200]  So contact me off the air. Let's see if we can do a little song and dance and seltzer
[38:00.200 --> 38:06.800]  down your pants. Let's throw a third party ringer at them.
[38:06.800 --> 38:16.240]  Sounds good. Okay. Okay. Send me an email. Let's talk.
[38:16.240 --> 38:21.240]  Call board has filled up. I just called you Ted, cause he's running out of callers. Now
[38:21.240 --> 38:30.640]  that we've got more callers, we don't feel like a hot rock. Yeah. I'll have a shot for
[38:30.640 --> 38:38.600]  you guys. Sounds good. I'm going to miss that. Do you have a shot for us?
[38:38.600 --> 38:45.560]  I remember I told you, I was just about to throw back a shot. Oh, the shot. Okay. And
[38:45.560 --> 38:53.240]  you're all, Ted Scarlett, you need to call back in here. I didn't drink the shot. I put
[38:53.240 --> 38:59.760]  it down. Okay. You can have your shot now. All right. And then, you know, the last couple
[38:59.760 --> 39:06.880]  of times I've called in, I know I've sounded scatterbrained and it's because I'm not organized
[39:06.880 --> 39:18.680]  right now. And so I got to get organized and get back real serious about this stuff. And
[39:18.680 --> 39:25.300]  I want anybody listening, you have to laugh so you don't cry. And seven years, all the
[39:25.300 --> 39:32.240]  pressure and stress, believe me, it's not fun, but I'm not going to let them walk over
[39:32.240 --> 39:36.040]  me. And you know, Ted,
[39:36.040 --> 39:43.040]  I think you should send them a thank you card. I really believe if they hadn't have done
[39:43.040 --> 39:53.800]  all this crap to you, you'd have just sat down and died. Now you got somebody that you
[39:53.800 --> 40:00.320]  need to beat the crap out of and you don't have time to be dead. So they might've saved
[40:00.320 --> 40:09.680]  your life. Yeah, for a while. But maybe, maybe not. But there's other stuff I want to talk
[40:09.680 --> 40:19.440]  to you on that score off the air. Give me a call sometime shortly. We got a lot of stuff
[40:19.440 --> 40:25.880]  in front of us. Let's formulate a plan to go after these judges that are so smug, they
[40:25.880 --> 40:33.920]  think they can do anything they want to. Let's do it. Okay. Have that shot and have one for
[40:33.920 --> 40:40.920]  me. All right, guys. Thank you very much. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Ted. Now we're
[40:40.920 --> 40:49.320]  going to go to what appears to be another first time caller. If you are in the 310 area
[40:49.320 --> 41:03.080]  code, this says California. Talk to us. Yes. Okay. Give us a first name. And is California
[41:03.080 --> 41:13.080]  correct? It is correct. I am in Southern California. That's a local LA number. My name is Dina.
[41:13.080 --> 41:21.800]  Dina, last time I was in California, I was in San Diego and it was, it was bad. I spent
[41:21.800 --> 41:33.240]  a week on the beach in San Diego and I, I could not catch a single bikini. Yeah. Yeah.
[41:33.240 --> 41:43.880]  And I sat in a restaurant and they had those big old windows open and my shark taco got
[41:43.880 --> 41:52.680]  cold before I could eat it. Oh, it was tough. And nobody felt sorry for me. I think it needs
[41:52.680 --> 42:00.800]  being Florida for the bikinis and they do running jogging out this year. I'm too old.
[42:00.800 --> 42:07.120]  I couldn't catch them in either case. If I caught one, I don't know what I would do it.
[42:07.120 --> 42:19.920]  I'd have to cut the line. Okay. What do you have for us today? Well, I decided this is
[42:19.920 --> 42:26.720]  tonight. I'm going to call in. So thank you all so much. I've been learning a lot and
[42:26.720 --> 42:32.080]  I'm streamlining everything that I'm downloading and reading. So I thought I'd call tonight
[42:33.200 --> 42:39.120]  to just ask for some guidance on a couple of things that are very current for me.
[42:41.200 --> 42:47.680]  One involves a job that I was contracted to do in December.
[42:47.680 --> 42:57.440]  And the job was rescinded because I did not do the testing that the producers said that
[42:57.440 --> 43:05.200]  I needed to do in order to work. When I signed the contract, none of this came up. It was
[43:05.200 --> 43:15.280]  a after the fact. Okay. I think the word for that is ultravires. Ultravires?
[43:15.280 --> 43:19.520]  Ultravires. Once you have entered into a contract,
[43:20.080 --> 43:29.840]  did anything of value change hands? Did you put in any time that would be billable?
[43:30.880 --> 43:38.880]  Did they pay you anything? A contract is not a contract until something of value changes hands.
[43:38.880 --> 43:47.840]  Food. Once something of value changes hands, the contract is enforced and it is complete.
[43:50.720 --> 43:59.360]  If one of the parties subsequent to the beginning of the contract.
[44:00.240 --> 44:06.160]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[44:06.160 --> 44:11.040]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.040 --> 44:17.360]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.360 --> 44:22.080]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[44:22.080 --> 44:27.680]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests
[44:27.680 --> 44:33.440]  to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity so
[44:33.440 --> 44:39.760]  much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:39.760 --> 44:46.480]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality
[44:46.480 --> 44:52.800]  radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[44:52.800 --> 44:58.240]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[44:58.240 --> 45:05.680]  Now, order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[45:05.680 --> 45:12.080]  with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, core CD course that will show you how
[45:12.080 --> 45:19.280]  in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you
[45:19.280 --> 45:25.120]  don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step
[45:25.120 --> 45:32.240]  course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of
[45:32.240 --> 45:38.000]  case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[45:38.000 --> 45:43.760]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[45:43.760 --> 45:51.440]  our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much
[45:51.440 --> 45:59.840]  more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:21.440 --> 46:24.960]  Oh,
[46:25.920 --> 46:28.640]  be careful what I'm wishing for.
[46:30.000 --> 46:38.000]  When I'm hungry, I like to know just what I'm fishing for. I ain't asking for much. I ain't
[46:38.000 --> 46:44.400]  trying to be no glutton. I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons.
[46:44.400 --> 47:02.640]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, oh, first name?
[47:02.640 --> 47:15.960]  Bena, B-E-N-A? Did you not tell us before? Oh, good. B-E-N-A, I thought I had
[47:15.960 --> 47:26.640]  forgot. I'm getting old. When I lost my mom, she had short-term memory loss and
[47:26.640 --> 47:36.320]  that had its upside, because I got to play the same jokes on her over and over.
[47:36.320 --> 47:45.440]  And she would think that we're funny every time. Anyway, okay, I kind of lost my
[47:45.440 --> 47:49.440]  place. I was talking to Brett. We have more fun on the breaks than
[47:49.440 --> 47:58.680]  we do during the show. Okay, where were we? You were explaining about if there's
[47:58.680 --> 48:04.720]  something of value that changes hands. Okay, contract, I'm sorry. Yeah, okay, I lost
[48:04.720 --> 48:09.640]  that. Once something has changed hands, once a commitment has been made and
[48:09.640 --> 48:14.560]  either one of you have taken some action and further instead of that commitment, the
[48:14.560 --> 48:20.520]  contract is solidified. So, you don't get to...
[48:24.680 --> 48:35.140]  B-E-N-A? Did the contract, did you do something in furtherance of the
[48:35.140 --> 48:47.080]  agreement? Yes, the nature of my work is craft-based, so it involves preparing
[48:47.080 --> 48:57.000]  what we call our kits and I did that. I was told through my text communication
[48:57.000 --> 49:05.640]  with the person who booked me, see you on set and... Okay, contract is consummated.
[49:05.640 --> 49:12.760]  Now you have a contract. Once that contract is consummated, they don't get
[49:12.760 --> 49:19.280]  to arbitrarily and capriciously change the covenants of the contract. They say
[49:19.280 --> 49:24.400]  we're going to make these changes. You say, okay, let's see. If you make those
[49:24.400 --> 49:33.600]  changes, this is how much it costs you. Did they do that? No, they just sent me
[49:33.600 --> 49:41.600]  email saying I needed to test in order to work. And in that case, you have a
[49:41.600 --> 49:48.680]  claim against them. If you prosecute a claim against them, will that get you
[49:48.680 --> 50:01.040]  blackballed? There's potential here. People are testing in order to work and
[50:01.040 --> 50:06.800]  very few people are unwilling to test because their careers and livelihoods
[50:06.800 --> 50:14.120]  are tied down to testing. Has the industry sort of been locked down in this way? Are
[50:14.120 --> 50:21.280]  you willing to risk your career in order to have this fight
[50:21.280 --> 50:30.040]  with them? But let me explain why I asked that question that way. Yes. I'm an old
[50:30.040 --> 50:38.560]  guy. I'm 72. I'm retired. My house is paid for. My car is paid for. I don't have any
[50:38.560 --> 50:42.200]  debt. I have a little bit of debt. We just redid a roof and I got a few
[50:42.200 --> 50:50.440]  thousand dollars. Chunk change. Nobody depends on me. My kids are grown. Heck, my
[50:50.440 --> 50:55.320]  kids are so great, they've already picked out the old folks home for me. They're
[50:55.320 --> 51:00.520]  trying to push me in it. But no, I don't have anybody. Depending on me, I can pick
[51:00.520 --> 51:08.360]  any fight I want to. Can you pick this fight? Are you in a position to where you
[51:08.360 --> 51:15.520]  can pick this fight? Because you don't have to. There are plenty of us out there who
[51:15.520 --> 51:20.600]  can pick this fight and we can afford to fight it. Can you afford to have this
[51:20.600 --> 51:28.360]  fight? That's a very good question and I have done consults or training. This is
[51:28.360 --> 51:35.360]  what I prepare to do. I love it. However, I will say, I say yes
[51:35.360 --> 51:43.600]  because the skills that I have to do this work that I would have been doing
[51:43.600 --> 51:51.080]  on this project have life beyond this project. So it's not limited to that. I
[51:51.080 --> 51:57.920]  did want to work the job and my skills are good enough to find other people
[51:57.920 --> 52:04.640]  that find value in them. So I don't think it's limited to that. At some point,
[52:04.640 --> 52:10.280]  we'll be released from this. But in the meantime, there is a month of work that I
[52:10.280 --> 52:17.840]  was deprived of which ties to my financial stability and solvency. So I'd
[52:17.840 --> 52:22.560]  like an opportunity to see what can be done to recoup some of what I wasn't
[52:22.560 --> 52:31.560]  able to do while working. You should be able to sue for the entire amount and
[52:31.560 --> 52:39.620]  potentially the entire amount in triplicate. But I wanted to be
[52:39.620 --> 52:47.880]  careful. There are so many fights out there. We can all get into more fights
[52:47.880 --> 52:57.240]  than we could ever complete. And always when especially someone like you who has
[52:57.240 --> 53:06.040]  a need for income, I want to say pick your fights real careful. Make sure this
[53:06.040 --> 53:12.880]  is the hill you're willing to die on. There may be others. If this is the
[53:12.880 --> 53:20.440]  one you're willing to take on, it may do you well because the political
[53:20.440 --> 53:29.600]  times are changing. The tide is turning against the vaccination people. We have
[53:29.600 --> 53:34.840]  and as we get closer to the interim election, I expect the tide to turn
[53:34.840 --> 53:40.920]  dramatically. So it may be the right time to do it. So assuming that you want to
[53:40.920 --> 53:53.400]  take this on, what are you willing to do? Do you want to sue them? I do. I want to go to just a
[53:53.400 --> 54:04.560]  vacant appointed. And on principle, yes, I want to do this. Okay, for the most part
[54:04.560 --> 54:08.040]  things are not like we think they are. You know, we want to fight for the
[54:08.040 --> 54:15.240]  principle and we think that the principle is the way we win the case.
[54:15.240 --> 54:21.640]  No, it's not. Money is good motivation. It's good motivation to do what you need to do
[54:21.640 --> 54:29.600]  to them. But money is how you win. That's how they measure. So we, you know, a lot of
[54:29.600 --> 54:32.760]  times we have people that want to do the right thing for the right reason. Well,
[54:32.760 --> 54:36.760]  good luck with that. That's a nice idea. But if you really want to make things
[54:36.760 --> 54:46.320]  change, you got to get in their pocket. Okay. So get in their pocket. The way you
[54:46.320 --> 54:54.440]  win, the way they gauge is by the money. Everything goes to the money. So have
[54:54.440 --> 55:01.560]  they, are you the only one they've done this to? That's a good question. I do have
[55:01.560 --> 55:08.560]  the call list of who would have been in my department. And when I got the
[55:08.560 --> 55:15.080]  response for the people who had not yet tested, it appeared to be a group email.
[55:15.080 --> 55:20.000]  In other words, I was BCC'd. So I don't know how many other people may or may not
[55:20.000 --> 55:29.280]  have opted not to test. But I do know who else was on crew based on earlier
[55:29.280 --> 55:35.520]  communications because you know, they just sent out an open email group
[55:35.520 --> 55:43.880]  message. So I have those. Okay. Or email. Yeah. Let me explain why I asked that
[55:43.880 --> 55:52.560]  question. In circumstances where a wrong has been committed, but the harm caused
[55:52.560 --> 56:01.440]  by the wrong is such that those people who were subject to the wrong could not
[56:01.440 --> 56:08.040]  effectively afford to take action to correct the wrong. The courts have
[56:08.040 --> 56:15.480]  recognized a type of suit they call a private attorney general suit. Now
[56:15.480 --> 56:20.560]  there's a bunch of stuff out there in the Patriot mythology movement that says,
[56:20.560 --> 56:27.000]  oh, you can be a private attorney general. No, you can't. But you can file a type
[56:27.000 --> 56:33.560]  of a suit that the courts have called a private attorney general suit. And what
[56:33.560 --> 56:40.440]  that suit is, it is a suit in your behalf and the behalf of all others
[56:40.440 --> 56:51.480]  similarly situated. Let's say they put up a camera at a red light and they
[56:51.480 --> 56:55.760]  accused me of running that red light based on this camera image. Well, the
[56:55.760 --> 57:02.440]  courts have ruled that that creates a new type of crime, crime by ownership. And
[57:02.440 --> 57:08.960]  you can't convict people of a crime unless you can prove that a certain
[57:08.960 --> 57:14.320]  individual committed that crime. All they could prove is that a car committed the
[57:14.320 --> 57:18.960]  crime. And so the courts have consistently ruled that it is unconstitutional.
[57:18.960 --> 57:25.200]  But local municipalities, they put up these cameras and they start writing
[57:25.200 --> 57:32.880]  people tickets and three, four hundred bucks is not worth a major lawsuit. So
[57:32.880 --> 57:37.520]  people, rather than fight it, will just write a check and pay it. Eventually
[57:37.520 --> 57:44.560]  they'll come along someone who's a real pain in the rear like me and I'll file a
[57:44.560 --> 57:48.720]  suit against them and they'll get a ruling. They have to stop doing it. But in
[57:48.720 --> 57:56.320]  the meantime, they made a lot of money. So what the courts have said is, if you
[57:56.320 --> 58:04.240]  are a member of a group of this nature, you can sue for the harm caused to you
[58:04.240 --> 58:12.640]  and all others similarly situated. And you get to claim damages for all these
[58:12.640 --> 58:18.880]  other people and that makes the suit valuable enough so that ordinary people
[58:18.880 --> 58:23.160]  can file these suits and write civil warrants. Does that make sense?
[58:23.160 --> 58:30.600]  Oh yeah. Okay. We're about to go to our sponsors. When we come back on the other side,
[58:30.600 --> 58:38.640]  we'll talk about how you can not just sue for your own benefit, but in the
[58:38.640 --> 58:43.200]  benefit of everyone else, maybe give these studios the reason to do the right
[58:43.200 --> 58:50.840]  thing the right way. Hang on. We'll be right back. Beautiful. Would you like to
[58:50.840 --> 58:55.520]  make more definite progress in your walk with God? Bibles for America is
[58:55.520 --> 59:00.120]  offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really
[59:00.120 --> 59:04.400]  help. The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study
[59:04.400 --> 59:09.160]  Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of
[59:09.160 --> 59:13.680]  footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. The free
[59:13.680 --> 59:17.760]  books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:17.760 --> 59:22.520]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's
[59:22.520 --> 59:28.440]  plan of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the church. To order your
[59:28.440 --> 59:33.120]  free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:33.120 --> 59:44.400]  call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102.
[59:44.400 --> 59:50.880]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:50.880 --> 59:59.360]  You're listening to the Logos to Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:01.360 --> 01:00:06.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. They
[01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:09.400]  guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our
[01:00:09.400 --> 01:00:13.200]  liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an
[01:00:13.200 --> 01:00:18.000]  unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. Privacy is
[01:00:18.000 --> 01:00:22.000]  under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:26.440]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to
[01:00:26.440 --> 01:00:30.960]  vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your
[01:00:30.960 --> 01:00:36.120]  information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service
[01:00:36.120 --> 01:00:40.040]  announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine
[01:00:40.040 --> 01:00:46.840]  alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. Imagine your
[01:00:46.840 --> 01:00:50.680]  mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and find a
[01:00:50.680 --> 01:00:54.480]  third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here
[01:00:54.480 --> 01:00:58.600]  tonight. That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what
[01:00:58.600 --> 01:01:02.400]  the Third Amendment was designed to prevent. It protects us from being forced
[01:01:02.400 --> 01:01:06.200]  to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding
[01:01:06.200 --> 01:01:10.760]  fathers. Third party, Third Amendment? Get it? So if you answer a knock at your
[01:01:10.760 --> 01:01:14.760]  door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the
[01:01:14.760 --> 01:01:18.680]  Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:18.680 --> 01:01:23.400]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:31.120 --> 01:01:35.760]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. They
[01:01:35.760 --> 01:01:39.160]  guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our
[01:01:39.160 --> 01:01:43.000]  liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:47.880]  unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. Privacy is
[01:01:47.880 --> 01:01:51.920]  under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:01:51.920 --> 01:01:56.360]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to
[01:01:56.360 --> 01:02:00.880]  vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your
[01:02:00.880 --> 01:02:06.040]  information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service
[01:02:06.040 --> 01:02:09.960]  announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine
[01:02:09.960 --> 01:02:17.160]  alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage. Imagine four
[01:02:17.160 --> 01:02:21.200]  eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray
[01:02:21.200 --> 01:02:25.400]  goggles. That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans
[01:02:25.400 --> 01:02:29.320]  freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. Fourth Amendment, four eyes
[01:02:29.320 --> 01:02:33.400]  staring at you, get it? Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth
[01:02:33.400 --> 01:02:38.400]  Amendment rights in the name of security. Keys in point, TSA airport scanners that
[01:02:38.400 --> 01:02:41.800]  appear under your clothing. When government employees demand a peep at
[01:02:41.800 --> 01:02:45.160]  your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the
[01:02:45.160 --> 01:02:49.320]  constitutional alarm bells. Join me in asking our representatives to dust off
[01:02:49.320 --> 01:02:53.400]  the Bill of Rights and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:53.400 --> 01:03:10.400]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:23.400 --> 01:03:52.040]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we've got
[01:03:52.040 --> 01:04:00.520]  one slot on the board, a call-in number 512-646-1984, and Mary Crinnick has
[01:04:00.520 --> 01:04:12.400]  beat me up about saying that too fast. That's 512-646-1984. Okay, we're going to
[01:04:12.400 --> 01:04:24.840]  be in California. Okay. Okay. Do you have a written contract? I do have my hard
[01:04:24.840 --> 01:04:32.840]  copy here that I sent in to the agency that booked me, and then I started
[01:04:32.840 --> 01:04:37.080]  receiving communication from the production company, so I have all those
[01:04:37.080 --> 01:04:48.800]  email things. So here's the deal. You're in California, and we just had Ted from
[01:04:48.800 --> 01:04:53.520]  California, and he'll tell you that the courts in California are absolutely
[01:04:53.520 --> 01:05:03.200]  corrupt. Yeah, but we find that pretty much everywhere, and we tell people in
[01:05:03.200 --> 01:05:14.000]  court, never expect to win your case in the trial court, and Dr. Graves in his
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:19.160]  course, Juris Dictionary, he tells you, don't expect to win in the trial court.
[01:05:19.160 --> 01:05:25.400]  That's not where you win, in spite of what you see on TV. Where you expect to
[01:05:25.400 --> 01:05:33.560]  win is in the appellate court. So your only purpose in the trial court is to
[01:05:33.560 --> 01:05:42.240]  set the record for appeal. You don't care what that judge rules. If they rule
[01:05:42.240 --> 01:05:48.120]  against you out of hand at every turn, you don't really care. Your only purpose
[01:05:48.120 --> 01:05:55.680]  is to get the facts and the law on the record, and that's because the appellate
[01:05:55.680 --> 01:06:01.560]  court has a whole different perspective than the trial court. The trial court is
[01:06:01.560 --> 01:06:10.160]  supposedly trying to find a just adjudication of the cases before them.
[01:06:10.160 --> 01:06:16.920]  The appellate court doesn't do that. The appellate court is responsible for the
[01:06:16.920 --> 01:06:25.640]  body of law, for the corpus juris, to keep it stable. They can't rule any way
[01:06:25.640 --> 01:06:33.880]  they want to. They have to rule in a way that maintains the body of law. So when
[01:06:33.880 --> 01:06:41.480]  you do your trial court, you only care about facts as they apply to law,
[01:06:41.480 --> 01:06:47.200]  because that's what the appellate court is going to look at. Okay, that was a setup
[01:06:47.200 --> 01:06:52.840]  so that when you start into the case and they start ruling against you
[01:06:52.840 --> 01:06:57.360]  out of hand at every turn, heck, you don't care. That's not going to make any
[01:06:57.360 --> 01:07:04.160]  difference. The way you really do it is facts and law, and here there is this
[01:07:04.160 --> 01:07:11.120]  pandemic. But we have courts ruling all over the country that just because
[01:07:11.120 --> 01:07:17.560]  there is a pandemic, that does not mean that the Constitution goes away. The most
[01:07:17.560 --> 01:07:25.760]  important time to have a Constitution is when there is a major crisis, because
[01:07:25.760 --> 01:07:32.240]  it's during major crises that governments are undermined. We have a
[01:07:32.240 --> 01:07:40.720]  recent case out of Connecticut, and actually one of my people that helped
[01:07:40.720 --> 01:07:46.760]  him, he got started in this ten years ago, and he filed suit against the
[01:07:46.760 --> 01:07:55.280]  governor in Connecticut. And the Connecticut courts issued an
[01:07:55.280 --> 01:08:05.920]  incredible ruling, and they talked about how Rome came to fall apart, that during
[01:08:05.920 --> 01:08:15.280]  a war, Caesar went in and took over the military and helped defeat whoever this
[01:08:15.280 --> 01:08:24.840]  enemy was, and they made him the supreme leader because he did this. And he was a
[01:08:24.840 --> 01:08:30.600]  great guy, and he ruled really well. Then he passed away, and his heir took over,
[01:08:30.600 --> 01:08:38.280]  and I think it was Cassius, and then following Cassius was Caligula, and
[01:08:38.280 --> 01:08:50.080]  because of Caligula, Rome dissipated. They gave up their republic to a leader
[01:08:50.080 --> 01:08:57.400]  because the leader saved them from a crisis, and it wound up destroying Rome.
[01:08:57.400 --> 01:09:07.480]  England, exact same way with Cornwall, caused their democratic society to
[01:09:07.480 --> 01:09:13.320]  dissipate and drop back into a monarchy, and they were saying that this is
[01:09:13.320 --> 01:09:21.880]  exactly the kinds of things that destroy republics. You're in that position now,
[01:09:21.880 --> 01:09:28.480]  and the politics is changing in your favor, so now is probably a really good
[01:09:28.480 --> 01:09:37.000]  time to take these guys on. Okay. So, how do we build a suit? Were you listening
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:46.120]  earlier when I was talking about how to construct a lawsuit? When you were
[01:09:46.120 --> 01:09:54.720]  speaking with Ted? No, before Ted. Brett, what was, it was a new caller, Austin in
[01:09:54.720 --> 01:10:02.080]  Florida. Mm-hmm. The Austin used to be in Tennessee. Yeah, it used to be in
[01:10:02.080 --> 01:10:09.040]  Tennessee. Did you hear the first part of the show? I did not, actually. I
[01:10:09.040 --> 01:10:14.960]  missed the first part. Okay, go back and listen to that. I talk about how to build
[01:10:14.960 --> 01:10:23.120]  a lawsuit. Okay. Especially complex lawsuits. They can get, there's so many
[01:10:23.120 --> 01:10:29.680]  things going on. Austin in Florida, he was talking about all these different
[01:10:29.680 --> 01:10:34.600]  things the police and other public officials did wrong. It's just stacks and
[01:10:34.600 --> 01:10:42.280]  stacks of them. We show people how to go after public officials, and the one thing
[01:10:42.280 --> 01:10:46.720]  we warn them about is when you start going after public officials, you have to
[01:10:46.720 --> 01:10:54.700]  be very selective. A problem with public officials is never finding criminal
[01:10:54.700 --> 01:11:00.680]  charges that you can file against public officials. They are extremely
[01:11:00.680 --> 01:11:07.240]  accommodating. They will give you more opportunities than you can ever get to.
[01:11:07.240 --> 01:11:15.360]  They give you more fights than you could ever finish, so we have to pick your
[01:11:15.360 --> 01:11:21.640]  fights very carefully. Look at, first thing we want to do is write up a
[01:11:21.640 --> 01:11:32.320]  timeline of events. Yours will be far simpler than Austin was, but it follows
[01:11:32.320 --> 01:11:40.000]  the same pattern. You write up a timeline of events. This is never used in your
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:46.800]  lawsuit, but it's the guiding tool to help you build your lawsuit. This
[01:11:46.800 --> 01:11:50.200]  happened, and this happened, and this happened. No explanation, no argument,
[01:11:50.200 --> 01:11:58.600]  just what happened and when. That gives you a backbone because memory is
[01:11:58.600 --> 01:12:04.320]  somewhat volatile. When you start telling people about what happened, you
[01:12:04.320 --> 01:12:13.680]  tell things from various different contexts. Recent study in memory showed
[01:12:13.680 --> 01:12:23.040]  that contrary to what we believe and how things appear to us, you don't go
[01:12:23.040 --> 01:12:28.040]  inside and read your memory and then relate what you read. That's not the way
[01:12:28.040 --> 01:12:33.920]  memory works. You go inside and take the memory out and re-experience it and
[01:12:33.920 --> 01:12:40.360]  then put it back. The problem is, is you put it back in the context in which
[01:12:40.360 --> 01:12:47.400]  you're speaking to it, and that causes you to lose some original context.
[01:12:47.400 --> 01:12:51.800]  That's why when people tell stories, and most all of us have told a story and
[01:12:51.800 --> 01:12:58.520]  somebody said, did that happen to you? You have to stop and think, I don't
[01:12:58.520 --> 01:13:03.280]  know. Did that happen to me or did somebody else tell me about it? It's one
[01:13:03.280 --> 01:13:10.920]  of the weaknesses in memory. The way to overcome that is you write a timeline.
[01:13:10.920 --> 01:13:14.160]  This happened, and this happened, and this happened, and this happened. Then
[01:13:14.160 --> 01:13:20.000]  you take your story and compare it to your timeline. If you have a happening
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:26.400]  out of place, the timeline will cause that to show up. I came up with this
[01:13:26.400 --> 01:13:32.240]  because I got myself hammered a few times in court for getting things
[01:13:32.240 --> 01:13:38.640]  chronologically out of place. It completely destroyed my position. First
[01:13:38.640 --> 01:13:45.760]  thing is you write up a timeline. These are all of the things we did. Then you
[01:13:45.760 --> 01:13:52.720]  go back to the timeline and you start looking at what were the things that
[01:13:52.720 --> 01:13:56.880]  were done wrong and by whom, and you list all of those out. I won't go
[01:13:56.880 --> 01:14:00.800]  through all of this here, but if you go back after the show and when our
[01:14:00.800 --> 01:14:06.720]  archives come up and re-listen to that first part, I go through this in
[01:14:06.720 --> 01:14:14.960]  detail. Is this the first time you've tried to file a civil litigation?
[01:14:14.960 --> 01:14:24.640]  I did one before pro se, and it was dismissed without prejudice. When I went
[01:14:24.640 --> 01:14:30.640]  back, I did not avail a different judge.
[01:14:30.640 --> 01:14:39.840]  Okay. Let's bring on Olivier. Dismissed without prejudice. You are... Okay,
[01:14:39.840 --> 01:14:45.120]  you've done suits before. You're somewhat more sophisticated. You had a
[01:14:45.120 --> 01:14:56.320]  suit dismissed without prejudice. Olivier, talk to us. Are you there?
[01:14:56.320 --> 01:14:57.680]  Yes.
[01:14:57.680 --> 01:15:12.720]  Okay. Tell me now how to read a dismissal that you get from a judge.
[01:15:12.720 --> 01:15:14.400]  How to read it?
[01:15:14.400 --> 01:15:16.560]  Yeah.
[01:15:16.560 --> 01:15:30.640]  The judge usually tells you what you're missing or what errors are at play.
[01:15:30.640 --> 01:15:36.800]  And for the most part, to tell you how to fix it. Olivier is in Florida and
[01:15:36.800 --> 01:15:45.040]  he's been taking these guys on. He files a suit. They dismiss his suit.
[01:15:45.040 --> 01:15:49.040]  He reads the judgment from the court and the court tells him exactly what he
[01:15:49.040 --> 01:15:54.000]  did wrong. And this is, especially when you get into the higher courts, they
[01:15:54.000 --> 01:16:01.520]  always do this. The courts want to find the best adjudication of cases. So
[01:16:01.520 --> 01:16:06.240]  they're going to tell both sides, this is what you did wrong, this is what you
[01:16:06.240 --> 01:16:10.720]  need to do to fix it. They'll tell both sides of that so that they can both
[01:16:10.720 --> 01:16:15.280]  come back with their best pleadings and the judge can make the best
[01:16:15.280 --> 01:16:21.040]  determination in the case. Does that make sense, Reena?
[01:16:21.040 --> 01:16:26.560]  It does. And that's what threw me off because when I went back, I had what
[01:16:26.560 --> 01:16:35.520]  was missing and the second judge dismissed outright. So I don't know what
[01:16:35.520 --> 01:16:37.680]  happened. I don't know why I went to another...
[01:16:37.680 --> 01:16:44.240]  Did the second judge give you a fine... Was this in the federal or in the
[01:16:44.240 --> 01:16:51.440]  state? It was city-state. Okay, that's why. Hold on, we're about to go to our
[01:16:51.440 --> 01:16:55.440]  sponsors. We'll pick this up on the other side. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[01:16:55.440 --> 01:17:00.000]  Wheel of Law Radio. We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:03.760]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or
[01:17:03.760 --> 01:17:08.800]  even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:17:08.800 --> 01:17:12.640]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors
[01:17:12.640 --> 01:17:16.720]  and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain
[01:17:16.720 --> 01:17:21.200]  English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do
[01:17:21.200 --> 01:17:25.840]  when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone
[01:17:25.840 --> 01:17:29.520]  calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:17:29.520 --> 01:17:34.480]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears
[01:17:34.480 --> 01:17:38.880]  proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal
[01:17:38.880 --> 01:17:42.640]  consultation is available as well. For more information please visit
[01:17:42.640 --> 01:17:47.200]  ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email
[01:17:47.200 --> 01:17:55.920]  michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[01:17:55.920 --> 01:18:00.080]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:00.080 --> 01:18:04.160]  I love Logos. Without the shows on this network I'd be almost as ignorant as my
[01:18:04.160 --> 01:18:07.760]  friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my
[01:18:07.760 --> 01:18:12.240]  truth fixed. I'd be lost without Logos and I really want to help keep this
[01:18:12.240 --> 01:18:15.520]  network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a
[01:18:15.520 --> 01:18:19.440]  Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on
[01:18:19.440 --> 01:18:24.480]  supplements. How can I help Logos? Well I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order
[01:18:24.480 --> 01:18:28.800]  anything from Amazon you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday
[01:18:28.800 --> 01:18:34.640]  gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now go to LogosradioNetwork.com
[01:18:34.640 --> 01:18:39.760]  click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now when you order anything from Amazon
[01:18:39.760 --> 01:18:45.200]  you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to
[01:18:45.200 --> 01:18:50.800]  do anything different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean yes.
[01:18:50.800 --> 01:18:55.680]  Wow giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect.
[01:18:55.680 --> 01:19:01.360]  Thank you so much. We are welcome. Happy holidays Logos.
[01:19:01.360 --> 01:19:04.880]  This is the Logos
[01:19:05.440 --> 01:19:08.400]  RadioNetwork.
[01:19:08.400 --> 01:19:16.560]  Oh come on.
[01:19:16.560 --> 01:19:45.760]  Okay we are back Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain,
[01:19:45.760 --> 01:19:50.800]  Willa Va Rio and we're talking to Bina in California and
[01:19:50.800 --> 01:19:56.160]  Olivier in Florida. Olivier has been fighting these guys
[01:19:56.160 --> 01:19:59.280]  quite a while and he's gotten pretty good at it.
[01:19:59.280 --> 01:20:06.240]  Olivier if you've been listening to to what Bina was talking about
[01:20:06.240 --> 01:20:09.520]  she got a contract to do some work and they
[01:20:09.520 --> 01:20:16.800]  changed the covenants of the contract after the contract was consummated
[01:20:16.800 --> 01:20:24.320]  and apparently there are other people who have been subjected to the same
[01:20:24.320 --> 01:20:31.680]  treatment or mistreatment. How would you suggest she go about crafting
[01:20:31.680 --> 01:20:41.280]  a claim that would be the most difficult for the studio to defend?
[01:20:44.720 --> 01:20:49.840]  Crafting the claim? Well the best thing I would see in this case
[01:20:49.840 --> 01:20:58.720]  would be to write up a declaratory suit with all the contractual
[01:20:58.720 --> 01:21:06.000]  arguments or issues that you have. Okay. So now once
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:10.160]  you bring those issues up once you write that suit up and you
[01:21:10.160 --> 01:21:18.080]  then they receive it they should see how far reaching that your
[01:21:18.080 --> 01:21:24.720]  accusations are and if a court has to clarify
[01:21:24.720 --> 01:21:30.720]  the issue if the court is made to clarify the issue as they should
[01:21:30.720 --> 01:21:34.080]  then all of the
[01:21:34.640 --> 01:21:38.640]  errors that were happening between the contract will be brought out
[01:21:38.640 --> 01:21:44.880]  and the fault would be noted. Who's at fault?
[01:21:44.880 --> 01:21:52.560]  Let me explain declaratory judgment suit. What Olivier is is pointing to
[01:21:52.560 --> 01:21:58.960]  is a special form of lawsuit. It's a really relatively recent
[01:21:58.960 --> 01:22:05.520]  innovation in law. It is they will allow a litigant
[01:22:05.520 --> 01:22:12.240]  to go to the courts and ask for a declaration of the rights of the
[01:22:12.240 --> 01:22:18.000]  parties and we like to do that because
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:25.760]  we can we pick out those particular issues we need
[01:22:25.760 --> 01:22:31.040]  that will win the case for us and instead of filing a standard
[01:22:31.040 --> 01:22:35.840]  criminal or standard civil complaint we file a petition for declaratory
[01:22:35.840 --> 01:22:40.880]  judgment. In Olivier's case he's claiming that
[01:22:40.880 --> 01:22:47.920]  certain sections in the traffic code in in Florida are void for vagueness
[01:22:47.920 --> 01:22:53.600]  because two people could read these
[01:22:53.600 --> 01:22:58.240]  statutes and come to diametrically opposed
[01:22:58.240 --> 01:23:04.320]  determinations as to what they meant. So he can go to the courts and ask for
[01:23:04.320 --> 01:23:12.560]  declaratory judgment and ask the court to state specifically what this means.
[01:23:12.560 --> 01:23:19.360]  So we're looking at your case. They changed the covenants of the
[01:23:19.360 --> 01:23:24.800]  contract after the contract was consummated
[01:23:24.800 --> 01:23:30.080]  and without giving you or even offering you any
[01:23:30.080 --> 01:23:35.120]  compensation. Correct. So you would go to the court
[01:23:35.120 --> 01:23:40.160]  and ask the court to declare whether or not
[01:23:40.160 --> 01:23:46.720]  one party to a contract after the contract has been consummated
[01:23:46.720 --> 01:23:51.680]  can one party add covenants to the contract
[01:23:51.680 --> 01:23:56.720]  that affect the other party without compensating the party
[01:23:56.720 --> 01:24:01.520]  for the added burden.
[01:24:01.680 --> 01:24:06.000]  And this is well established in law is no they can't.
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:14.480]  The term is called unconscionable. Yes. An unconscionable covenant
[01:24:14.480 --> 01:24:21.680]  in a contract is a covenant whereby one party benefits and the other
[01:24:21.680 --> 01:24:26.800]  party is not does not benefit in a way that
[01:24:26.800 --> 01:24:30.960]  offsets the the loss they would have from the other.
[01:24:30.960 --> 01:24:36.480]  I didn't say I said that a little clumsily. One party can't benefit to the
[01:24:36.480 --> 01:24:44.240]  detriment of another. So they instituted covenants
[01:24:44.240 --> 01:24:48.000]  but they didn't compensate you for those covenants
[01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:56.720]  that makes them unconscionable. So you ask the court can the studio
[01:24:56.720 --> 01:25:02.800]  introduce different requirements beyond the original contract without
[01:25:02.800 --> 01:25:07.360]  compensating me for those contracts. So you're not
[01:25:07.360 --> 01:25:14.560]  asking to receive damages. You're not asking for any harm
[01:25:14.560 --> 01:25:21.280]  and since there is no harm then there
[01:25:21.920 --> 01:25:26.400]  no one can be harmed. I'm sorry since you're not asking for damages
[01:25:26.400 --> 01:25:32.480]  no one can be harmed by the ruling. So
[01:25:32.880 --> 01:25:39.520]  there is no access to a 12b6 motion to dismiss
[01:25:39.520 --> 01:25:43.200]  for failure to state a claim. I'm sorry the word I was looking for
[01:25:43.200 --> 01:25:48.560]  there are no claims in a declaratory judgment suit.
[01:25:48.560 --> 01:25:52.320]  If you file a suit the other side is going to file a motion to dismiss
[01:25:52.320 --> 01:25:58.000]  for failure to state a claim. Declaratory judgment suits don't have
[01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:00.400]  claims.
[01:26:00.800 --> 01:26:06.320]  So nobody can be harmed by a declaratory judgment suit.
[01:26:06.320 --> 01:26:10.880]  You're not asking for attorney fees you're not asking for damages of any
[01:26:10.880 --> 01:26:15.440]  kind. So the other party cannot be harmed
[01:26:15.440 --> 01:26:18.880]  and because of that they cannot file a motion
[01:26:18.880 --> 01:26:22.400]  to dismiss for failure to state a claim. In the
[01:26:22.400 --> 01:26:28.720]  in the federal that's a 12b6 motion and
[01:26:28.720 --> 01:26:32.560]  there were some changes in the law about 10 years ago
[01:26:32.560 --> 01:26:38.240]  that after those changes if you file a lawsuit you're going to
[01:26:38.240 --> 01:26:44.000]  get a 12b6 motion no matter what. But if you file a declaratory judgment
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:49.680]  suit there are no claims so they can't file
[01:26:49.680 --> 01:26:55.440]  a motion saying plaintiff failed to state a claim on which
[01:26:55.440 --> 01:27:00.960]  recovery can be had because you're not asking for recovery.
[01:27:00.960 --> 01:27:04.480]  And what that does is it sticks them in court
[01:27:04.480 --> 01:27:11.120]  and forces them into discovery and that's that's the part that costs
[01:27:11.120 --> 01:27:18.000]  them the most money. It's all about the money.
[01:27:19.840 --> 01:27:25.600]  Now that may not be right but that's how it is in the world we live in
[01:27:25.600 --> 01:27:30.640]  and a declaratory judgment of most of we have yet to have a lawyer
[01:27:30.640 --> 01:27:35.120]  who knew what they were. Tina Colebrook she's
[01:27:35.120 --> 01:27:39.680]  calls in all the time. She was in an issue in California
[01:27:39.680 --> 01:27:43.200]  and we got her to file a petition for declaratory judgment.
[01:27:43.200 --> 01:27:48.400]  She immediately got a motion dismissed for failure to state a claim.
[01:27:48.400 --> 01:27:55.040]  Well duh there are no claims. Olivier what has your experience been
[01:27:55.040 --> 01:28:00.000]  when you file declaratory judgments? I filed
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:03.200]  declaratory judgment and there were eight
[01:28:03.200 --> 01:28:09.040]  different actors on the suit. Each actor threw each other underneath the
[01:28:09.040 --> 01:28:13.840]  bus and added a rule to a v6
[01:28:13.840 --> 01:28:18.560]  failure to state a motion. I'm a failure to state a claim.
[01:28:20.400 --> 01:28:25.360]  Then you get to file for sanctions against them for being stupid.
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:33.360]  And if you get a ruling in your favor then you come back with a regular lawsuit
[01:28:33.360 --> 01:28:38.960]  and the issue before the court is already been adjudicated. You
[01:28:38.960 --> 01:28:41.760]  already won.
[01:28:42.080 --> 01:28:47.680]  It's a tactic and it is a stealth tactic. For the most part these
[01:28:47.680 --> 01:28:50.880]  lawyers simply aren't smart enough to see it
[01:28:50.880 --> 01:28:55.360]  coming. When we come back we'll go to Olivier.
[01:28:55.360 --> 01:29:03.040]  Let me explain what he's doing. He is winding these people's clocks
[01:29:03.040 --> 01:29:09.760]  and he's a pro se. He was actually
[01:29:09.760 --> 01:29:15.360]  driving around in Florida while he was black.
[01:29:15.680 --> 01:29:24.720]  Do you imagine that? And they took him on and he is wiping the floor with them.
[01:29:24.720 --> 01:29:29.920]  When we come back we'll go to Olivier. Let him explain what he's doing.
[01:29:29.920 --> 01:29:35.600]  He will be able to help you set these guys up and blow them away.
[01:29:35.600 --> 01:29:40.160]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Root of La Radio.
[01:29:40.160 --> 01:29:45.920]  Let's see we have just two callers. We've got room for one more caller.
[01:29:45.920 --> 01:29:51.360]  Call in number 512-646-1984. If you have a question or
[01:29:51.360 --> 01:30:01.440]  comment give us a call. We'll be right back.
[01:30:01.440 --> 01:30:05.120]  A top cyber security expert has a warning for America.
[01:30:05.120 --> 01:30:08.640]  If you build an electrical smart grid the hackers will come
[01:30:08.640 --> 01:30:12.880]  and they could cause a catastrophic blackout. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht
[01:30:12.880 --> 01:30:15.840]  back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:30:15.840 --> 01:30:20.640]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself you'll never get it
[01:30:20.640 --> 01:30:23.600]  back again. And once your privacy is gone you'll
[01:30:23.600 --> 01:30:26.480]  find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.480 --> 01:30:30.800]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information
[01:30:30.800 --> 01:30:34.240]  to yourself. Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.240 --> 01:30:38.640]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com. The private search engine
[01:30:38.640 --> 01:30:45.360]  alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:45.360 --> 01:30:49.360]  Governments love power so it's only natural they'd want to control the power
[01:30:49.360 --> 01:30:53.600]  going into your home too with a smart grid. So they're installing a national
[01:30:53.600 --> 01:30:58.000]  network of smart meters to remotely monitor electric use for efficiency and
[01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:01.680]  avoid grid failure. But cyber security expert David Chalk
[01:31:01.680 --> 01:31:04.800]  says not so fast. If we make the national power grid
[01:31:04.800 --> 01:31:08.720]  controllable through the web hackers will have a field day. Working
[01:31:08.720 --> 01:31:12.480]  remotely they could tap in and black out the entire nation
[01:31:12.480 --> 01:31:16.880]  leaving us vulnerable to our enemies. I've long opposed smart meters for
[01:31:16.880 --> 01:31:20.960]  privacy and health reasons. The catastrophic failures caused by
[01:31:20.960 --> 01:31:23.760]  hackers? There's nothing smart about that.
[01:31:23.760 --> 01:31:27.920]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht for Startpage.com the world's most private
[01:31:27.920 --> 01:31:30.560]  search engine.
[01:31:31.200 --> 01:31:35.040]  This is building seven a 47-story skyscraper that fell
[01:31:35.040 --> 01:31:38.240]  on the afternoon of September 11th. The government says that fire brought it
[01:31:38.240 --> 01:31:42.160]  down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded
[01:31:42.160 --> 01:31:45.760]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 my fellow service members have
[01:31:45.760 --> 01:31:49.360]  given their lives. Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm
[01:31:49.360 --> 01:31:52.320]  not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City
[01:31:52.320 --> 01:31:55.840]  correction office. I'm an air force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're
[01:31:55.840 --> 01:31:58.800]  Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to
[01:31:58.800 --> 01:32:04.480]  rememberbuildingseven.org today. Rule of law radio is proud to offer the
[01:32:04.480 --> 01:32:07.360]  rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America we live in an us
[01:32:07.360 --> 01:32:10.560]  against them society. If we the people are ever going to have a free society
[01:32:10.560 --> 01:32:13.440]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.440 --> 01:32:16.240]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the
[01:32:16.240 --> 01:32:19.440]  right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly the right to due
[01:32:19.440 --> 01:32:21.920]  process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least
[01:32:21.920 --> 01:32:25.280]  expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through
[01:32:25.280 --> 01:32:27.920]  due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in
[01:32:27.920 --> 01:32:30.880]  conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive
[01:32:30.880 --> 01:32:34.160]  teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and
[01:32:34.160 --> 01:32:37.280]  how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this
[01:32:37.280 --> 01:32:40.880]  invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy
[01:32:40.880 --> 01:32:43.840]  today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas
[01:32:43.840 --> 01:32:47.200]  Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Line, video and audio of the original
[01:32:47.200 --> 01:32:50.080]  2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other
[01:32:50.080 --> 01:32:53.040]  useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of
[01:32:53.040 --> 01:32:56.960]  this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we
[01:32:56.960 --> 01:33:01.280]  can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:01.280 --> 01:33:09.920]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:31.280 --> 01:33:40.800]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton. We're at Fountain Rule Law Radio and we're
[01:33:40.800 --> 01:33:45.920]  talking to Vena in California and Olivier in Tennessee. No, no, not in
[01:33:45.920 --> 01:33:50.800]  Tennessee. Olivier used to be in Tennessee. You're still in our
[01:33:50.800 --> 01:33:58.720]  databases, Tennessee. Olivier in Florida. Okay, Olivier,
[01:33:58.720 --> 01:34:06.640]  how would you explain to Vena how to file a declaratory judgment suit in her
[01:34:06.640 --> 01:34:07.040]  case?
[01:34:11.200 --> 01:34:20.720]  How would I, in her case, I would raise the argument of the contract,
[01:34:20.720 --> 01:34:28.880]  of the acceptance, of the acceptance of the contract and I would also include
[01:34:28.880 --> 01:34:38.000]  the vaccine requirement as unconstitutional.
[01:34:39.520 --> 01:34:40.080]  Yes.
[01:34:40.080 --> 01:34:47.600]  And then I would also include others similarly situated and show,
[01:34:47.600 --> 01:34:56.240]  and you're more in the field, so if you can show how it affects others
[01:34:56.240 --> 01:35:09.840]  similar situated and this way that it affects them, it would help you on your
[01:35:09.840 --> 01:35:20.720]  hand, on your side because it will let the other side know how vast of a
[01:35:20.720 --> 01:35:22.080]  topic that you're bringing.
[01:35:24.320 --> 01:35:24.800]  Okay.
[01:35:24.800 --> 01:35:28.880]  How much trouble you're bringing. You're just not bringing one issue.
[01:35:28.880 --> 01:35:33.520]  You're bringing the underlying issue that domino affects a whole line of
[01:35:33.520 --> 01:35:34.000]  other things.
[01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:40.880]  It does. There's been a lot of talk about the testing requirement because
[01:35:40.880 --> 01:35:46.240]  they're now saying, okay, we realize not everybody's going to vax and that's
[01:35:46.240 --> 01:35:50.160]  okay is if they have that right to even give us that permission, but then
[01:35:50.160 --> 01:35:55.840]  they're saying, but because you're working close with others, you have to
[01:35:55.840 --> 01:35:59.760]  test and you have to mask, so they're requiring that if you work on any
[01:35:59.760 --> 01:36:05.040]  production, I think you have to test at least a couple of times a week and
[01:36:05.040 --> 01:36:06.240]  that's pretty extreme.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:14.560]  So the only way to do my work means that I've got to do these invasive things
[01:36:14.560 --> 01:36:18.240]  that I have yet to agree to do.
[01:36:21.520 --> 01:36:25.360]  Well, that's the challenge, right? That's a constitutional challenge right
[01:36:25.360 --> 01:36:32.640]  there. I mean, it's a declaratory reason. That's a declaratory issue right
[01:36:32.640 --> 01:36:37.920]  there to declare that can you be forced to do that? Is that constitution?
[01:36:39.040 --> 01:36:39.360]  Okay.
[01:36:42.080 --> 01:36:45.200]  There's many questions just because you're doing the suit. There's many
[01:36:45.200 --> 01:36:52.080]  questions that you can ask in the suit. Try to make them, don't make them
[01:36:52.080 --> 01:36:58.240]  relate too close, but still in the same arena so they can understand that
[01:36:58.240 --> 01:37:03.120]  these questions are being brought up because of the conflict between you
[01:37:03.120 --> 01:37:04.000]  and the other party.
[01:37:05.200 --> 01:37:12.720]  Okay. The only thing I would add that seems pertinent to me, I don't have
[01:37:13.280 --> 01:37:18.720]  physical addresses, what I have are email addresses and when I search out
[01:37:18.720 --> 01:37:26.960]  the project on IMDB, I just have a production company address. So I would
[01:37:26.960 --> 01:37:34.000]  have to presume that mail could get to, I guess it's the unit manager or the
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:37.840]  production manager through the production address.
[01:37:40.080 --> 01:37:46.800]  That's acceptable. You have to give constructive notice
[01:37:46.800 --> 01:37:49.280]  and email, email is my favorite.
[01:37:50.160 --> 01:37:50.720]  Okay.
[01:37:50.720 --> 01:38:01.040]  Email always leaves tracks. I can send something, return receipts, certified
[01:38:01.840 --> 01:38:06.320]  and they claim they didn't get it. Well, okay, well, I can call both
[01:38:06.320 --> 01:38:11.040]  of the inspectors and tell them, look, I sent this, it's insured for 50 bucks
[01:38:11.040 --> 01:38:15.120]  automatically. I want my 50 bucks. They claim they didn't get it. You guys
[01:38:15.120 --> 01:38:19.680]  didn't deliver it. And they'll get a visit from the postal inspector and the
[01:38:19.680 --> 01:38:24.640]  postal inspector will go down there and make them admit that they got it.
[01:38:26.160 --> 01:38:26.640]  Wow.
[01:38:27.440 --> 01:38:33.040]  Postal inspectors are tough, but that's a lot of pain in the neck. With an
[01:38:33.040 --> 01:38:36.160]  email, they can't claim they didn't get it.
[01:38:37.440 --> 01:38:37.920]  Okay.
[01:38:38.960 --> 01:38:41.760]  It leaves tracks that they can't erase.
[01:38:41.760 --> 01:38:47.360]  So I am filing criminal charges against a bunch of district judges for not issuing
[01:38:47.360 --> 01:38:56.160]  warrants on my complaints and I emailed my complaints to them. Their functionaries
[01:38:56.160 --> 01:38:59.680]  probably got these and said, oh, this doesn't apply to this judge and trashed
[01:38:59.680 --> 01:39:07.280]  them. Too bad. I get to hold the judge responsible anyway. So email is great.
[01:39:07.280 --> 01:39:14.320]  Email is fine. If you don't know who someone is specifically, it's enough to
[01:39:14.320 --> 01:39:20.880]  reference them generally. And you can determine who they are specifically in
[01:39:21.920 --> 01:39:22.720]  discovery.
[01:39:24.240 --> 01:39:24.720]  Okay.
[01:39:25.360 --> 01:39:28.560]  The thing they don't want to get to is discovery.
[01:39:30.720 --> 01:39:33.520]  That's when they start racking up costs.
[01:39:33.520 --> 01:39:39.840]  So then declaratory judgment suits are perfect because they don't have very
[01:39:39.840 --> 01:39:46.640]  many ways of avoiding discovery. But we're running low. I would like you to
[01:39:46.640 --> 01:39:50.560]  hear what Olivier has been up to.
[01:39:51.760 --> 01:39:56.000]  Okay. And then I'm going to listen and one more question for you, please.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:59.040]  May I email you the name of the producer?
[01:39:59.040 --> 01:40:03.680]  One more question for you, please. May I email you the name of the production
[01:40:03.680 --> 01:40:07.600]  company? Randy, just so you know who's in play here.
[01:40:08.480 --> 01:40:15.040]  Absolutely. Randy at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:40:16.240 --> 01:40:17.520]  I got it. Thank you.
[01:40:18.560 --> 01:40:22.240]  We can spend more time on this off the air and get into a little more detail.
[01:40:23.040 --> 01:40:25.600]  I'll have to admit to you that I kind of used you.
[01:40:25.600 --> 01:40:31.280]  You know, this is a radio show and we try to teach all of our listeners. So I used
[01:40:31.280 --> 01:40:38.000]  your case to try to demonstrate how to do several different things, private
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:43.200]  attorney general suit and declaratory judgment suit. So off the air, we can be
[01:40:43.200 --> 01:40:44.160]  more specific.
[01:40:45.040 --> 01:40:48.960]  I love it. Thank you so much. And I'm ready to listen, Olivier. Thank you for
[01:40:48.960 --> 01:40:50.080]  your input, Olivier.
[01:40:51.040 --> 01:40:51.680]  Okay.
[01:40:51.680 --> 01:40:57.440]  Okay. Okay, Olivier, what have you been up to?
[01:40:58.880 --> 01:41:07.520]  I just had a trial the day. The one where I filed a motion and I asked for a hearing
[01:41:07.520 --> 01:41:14.400]  date and the judge said that, well, they changed it to a hearing date, but I guess
[01:41:14.400 --> 01:41:20.400]  they, when I got there, did the hearing, then they proceeded to trial.
[01:41:24.160 --> 01:41:28.000]  So had you been given notice of the trial?
[01:41:30.480 --> 01:41:38.000]  They set it for a trial. They set a trial that he was trying to set a trial date.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:42.320]  The last time I was, the judge was trying to set a trial date, the last time I went to court,
[01:41:42.320 --> 01:41:48.800]  I told the judge that I wanted a date before trial date to get my emotions hurt.
[01:41:49.360 --> 01:41:55.920]  He told me to call his secretary to set it up. I called his secretary. His secretary
[01:41:55.920 --> 01:42:05.440]  changed the trial date to a hearing date on the computer. So it shows the hearing date.
[01:42:05.440 --> 01:42:11.040]  So now I go, now I show up to the hearing date and he's telling me, oh, it was set up
[01:42:11.040 --> 01:42:21.120]  for trial. Oh, wonderful. So you should file criminally against the clerk.
[01:42:28.880 --> 01:42:35.520]  Because she told you that she was setting this for a hearing date,
[01:42:35.520 --> 01:42:40.000]  but you wound up having to go to trial. So you were tried by Bushwack.
[01:42:43.280 --> 01:42:50.560]  It was the judge's duty to train the clerk so that she gives proper notice,
[01:42:52.160 --> 01:42:55.040]  but she wound up not giving you proper notice.
[01:42:57.440 --> 01:42:59.760]  That will jerk a knot in their behinds.
[01:42:59.760 --> 01:43:06.000]  Actually, the rest of the story, I can't tell you all of it because we don't have time, but
[01:43:07.120 --> 01:43:14.800]  this was a very strange case. And as soon as I get you the video, you might play it on air,
[01:43:14.800 --> 01:43:24.240]  but this is very strange. After he said, after the judge proceeded to say his rant that I told you
[01:43:24.240 --> 01:43:33.360]  last time that it was trial date and all this, I told him, the break is about to come up.
[01:43:34.320 --> 01:43:41.280]  Okay. Hang on. We'll pick this up on the other side of Randy Kelton, Fountain, Rue La Radio.
[01:43:41.280 --> 01:43:45.840]  I'm not going to give out the call-in number. We've only got one segment left, but
[01:43:45.840 --> 01:43:53.200]  Olivier is always good entertainment. We'll be right back.
[01:44:16.000 --> 01:44:20.240]  This is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated,
[01:44:20.240 --> 01:44:25.520]  adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jeopardy can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.520 --> 01:44:31.440]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.440 --> 01:44:37.280]  We have come to trust Young Jeopardy so much we became a marketing distributor along with Alex
[01:44:37.280 --> 01:44:43.920]  Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will
[01:44:43.920 --> 01:44:50.160]  improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jeopardy,
[01:44:50.160 --> 01:44:55.200]  you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:44:55.200 --> 01:44:59.680]  help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:03.280 --> 01:45:08.160]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[01:45:08.160 --> 01:45:14.480]  with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how
[01:45:14.480 --> 01:45:21.680]  in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you
[01:45:21.680 --> 01:45:27.600]  don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step
[01:45:27.600 --> 01:45:34.640]  course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of
[01:45:34.640 --> 01:45:40.480]  case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[01:45:40.480 --> 01:45:46.160]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[01:45:46.160 --> 01:45:53.840]  our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much
[01:45:53.840 --> 01:46:05.120]  more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.840 --> 01:46:51.120]  The people
[01:46:51.120 --> 01:47:01.520]  come down from the hill. Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Breath Fountain Rule of Law Radio.
[01:47:02.080 --> 01:47:10.240]  This is our last segment on our Friday four-hour info marathon, and we're talking to Olivier
[01:47:10.240 --> 01:47:18.720]  in Tennessee. Okay, Olivier, where were we before you kept me from falling off the cliff?
[01:47:18.720 --> 01:47:26.400]  Okay. Now we're at the judge refusing to give me a continuance. I requested a
[01:47:26.400 --> 01:47:36.240]  continuance after he denied my motion. Well, I asked for a continuance before he went over the motion,
[01:47:36.240 --> 01:47:51.440]  and he was like, I said, I'm going to need to file an interlocutor appeal. And then he said,
[01:47:51.440 --> 01:47:58.160]  interlocutor appeal. He said, but didn't I let you know that we were going to hear the trial,
[01:47:58.160 --> 01:48:03.840]  hear your motion, and hear the goal of the trial today? And I said, yes, you did say that. And I
[01:48:03.840 --> 01:48:09.920]  did also tell you that I wanted a date before the trial. So this went back and forth for a little
[01:48:09.920 --> 01:48:16.800]  bit. Then he decided, well, no, I'm not going to, I'm going to deny your request. I said, okay.
[01:48:17.440 --> 01:48:23.440]  And like, he was like shocked, like, you know, like looking at me, I said, okay, just step back
[01:48:23.440 --> 01:48:33.280]  down and just relax. And what you said earlier, this was the weirdest thing, I guess it drives
[01:48:33.280 --> 01:48:39.680]  him crazy. Or I don't know, he started to assess the judges and everybody else that I sued earlier.
[01:48:40.320 --> 01:48:46.960]  I just said, okay, fine. I know I have a right to an interlocutor appeal. You're like, well,
[01:48:46.960 --> 01:48:51.040]  what makes you think that you have a right to an interlocutor appeal? I'm like, well,
[01:48:52.320 --> 01:48:59.920]  if you didn't deny my motion, I get to, I get to appeal, I get to file an interlocutor appeal
[01:48:59.920 --> 01:49:05.840]  to the appeal court, address it, especially if that motion is dispositive of the case.
[01:49:06.720 --> 01:49:11.840]  And he's like, well, where do you get that information from? I said, I don't know.
[01:49:15.360 --> 01:49:19.760]  I don't know. Your honor, you want me to give you legal advice?
[01:49:22.480 --> 01:49:29.360]  I don't know. I'm not educated. I just know through my research and then like he's sitting back
[01:49:29.360 --> 01:49:34.560]  and because he just came, he said, he's sitting back and listening to me. I just know through
[01:49:34.560 --> 01:49:42.880]  all my research that that is one of the rights that I have. You're telling me I don't. Okay,
[01:49:42.880 --> 01:49:53.360]  now proceed. You're the judge. So he's really like, well, explain. I'm like, for what?
[01:49:53.360 --> 01:50:00.000]  I'm like, let's go. Let's move on. You know what I mean? Well, what do I need to explain?
[01:50:01.520 --> 01:50:07.280]  I'm looking at him bewildered like, why? You said, you're the judge. You said,
[01:50:08.640 --> 01:50:12.880]  we're going to continue with the trial and I don't have that right. Okay, it's on record.
[01:50:13.520 --> 01:50:22.000]  Let's go. I don't like that approach. He really derailed him. In the middle of the trial,
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:27.920]  he started, he said, Ms. Olivia, you know what? I'm going to do it the way that the court
[01:50:28.240 --> 01:50:35.120]  prescribes it. And then I'm going to do it the way you want it to be done. I'm looking,
[01:50:35.120 --> 01:50:39.280]  I'm like, what? I'm looking, I'm turning around looking at Troy and I'm like, what is going on
[01:50:39.280 --> 01:50:46.160]  here? It got to the point where so much stuff was happening. And I guess the more and more
[01:50:46.160 --> 01:50:54.560]  and more I started to speak and he finally had time to go read my legal research that I wrote.
[01:50:56.320 --> 01:51:01.680]  He made it, he made, he was making comments as Ms. Olivia, do you have something to say?
[01:51:01.680 --> 01:51:08.640]  Because if you have a issue to bring up, I'm more inclined to believe it through the research that
[01:51:08.640 --> 01:51:17.440]  I've seen that you've done. And I'm like, I'm looking at him like, I ain't got, I'm just saying
[01:51:17.440 --> 01:51:25.600]  I have to, I'm just saying what I have to say. I don't, I'm not going to drag it on. It's written
[01:51:25.600 --> 01:51:36.560]  down. He was very, he was watching what was going on. The prosecutor was objecting to questions
[01:51:36.560 --> 01:51:45.920]  that I was asking the officer on the stand and the judge let the questions go. He was,
[01:51:47.920 --> 01:51:54.320]  I don't know if he was terrified or intrigued just to see what would happen because of how
[01:51:54.320 --> 01:52:05.600]  aggressive I was, but not with just ludicrous things. And so I was actually asking questions
[01:52:05.600 --> 01:52:12.720]  to bring out, you know, did he see the accident? What did he arrest me for? And that's another
[01:52:12.720 --> 01:52:18.720]  question. The officer basically lied on stand. He said that he arrested me for a misdemeanor.
[01:52:19.680 --> 01:52:23.840]  And I grilled him, I kept on grilling him, went back around it and I said, you didn't arrest me
[01:52:23.840 --> 01:52:29.120]  for a felony? It was a misdemeanor? You didn't arrest me and put me in jail for a felony?
[01:52:29.840 --> 01:52:35.040]  And then he was standing there like looking at the judge to save him. Like I don't have to answer
[01:52:35.040 --> 01:52:40.400]  that. Like, you know, and the prosecutor's trying to find something to, you know, and the judge was
[01:52:40.400 --> 01:52:48.240]  like, oh, Jackson, your honor. And then I look at the judge expecting the judge to rule against me
[01:52:48.240 --> 01:52:55.040]  or tell me that I can't ask those questions. The judge looked at me. He's like, he's thinking in
[01:52:55.040 --> 01:53:01.040]  the air. He's like, I'm going to allow it. I'm about, I'm, I almost died. I'm like, oh my God,
[01:53:01.040 --> 01:53:10.240]  you, I'm like, wait a minute, you got a municipal court judge to actually allow a question?
[01:53:11.200 --> 01:53:20.080]  It is all my question. He said, I'm going to allow it. He, everything. He even reiterated
[01:53:20.080 --> 01:53:25.440]  questions to the officer so the officer can answer. He said, this is what Mrs. Olivier wants to know,
[01:53:25.440 --> 01:53:32.000]  officer. It got to the point where I think the judge got caught in Twilight Zone. Like he actually
[01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:38.800]  see, got to see where I'm coming from because at the end of trial, right, he found me guilty.
[01:53:38.800 --> 01:53:44.160]  He said, Mr. Olivier, you're not learned counsel. You should allow them to give you learned counsel.
[01:53:44.160 --> 01:53:50.160]  There was many points in this case where evidence should have been brought up that I could not,
[01:53:50.160 --> 01:53:55.200]  I should not have been able to review. And I'm sitting here looking at the judge like,
[01:53:55.200 --> 01:53:58.960]  you know, you're on recording, right? I'm like, what's going on here?
[01:53:59.760 --> 01:54:04.720]  I'm like, the DA is not objecting. I'm like, what is going on here? He was telling me everything
[01:54:04.720 --> 01:54:12.240]  that they did wrong. And you know, I'm like, what is going to, is he, is this really happening?
[01:54:13.920 --> 01:54:20.000]  You know, he's saying every, and then he's like, uh, we have a good, uh, public defenders.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:25.280]  Uh, I want to assign you a public defender for your appeal because we know this is going to appeal.
[01:54:26.160 --> 01:54:30.560]  Yeah. I'm saying, I'm like, wait, you just told me everything that was wrong.
[01:54:32.720 --> 01:54:36.160]  And then it tells me that something about, um, there's no proper
[01:54:37.280 --> 01:54:42.240]  indictment or something in the system because, but that was brought out through my line of
[01:54:42.240 --> 01:54:47.040]  questioning. That was a problem that I didn't have no, I didn't have no demand for discovery
[01:54:47.040 --> 01:54:51.360]  and had nothing. I just came in there empty handed, ready for emotion.
[01:54:52.240 --> 01:54:55.280]  And I'm like, well, if that's what you want to do, fine, go ahead. So
[01:54:56.480 --> 01:55:00.560]  through all the line of questioning, that's how everything came out. And then the judge,
[01:55:00.560 --> 01:55:05.680]  he even jumped on the computer and started looking at stuff because the DA was asking,
[01:55:05.680 --> 01:55:12.240]  like, my questions were crazy and had no merit, no reasoning. The judge started looking on the
[01:55:12.240 --> 01:55:17.920]  computer and like, he's looking at it. He's sitting back, like, appalled, like, what is wrong?
[01:55:17.920 --> 01:55:24.320]  He's looking at the officer, looking at the DA. And he was just like, you know what? He,
[01:55:24.320 --> 01:55:30.880]  he let me have the reign. He let me, he did everything she tried to do. He like, I'm going to
[01:55:30.880 --> 01:55:39.200]  allow it. He even said, and he said, you know what? I did things I wasn't supposed to do on both ends.
[01:55:39.200 --> 01:55:42.880]  And I'm sitting here like, your honor, you just set that on record.
[01:55:45.600 --> 01:55:46.000]  All right.
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:48.880]  I guess he's not scared of somebody reporting you.
[01:55:50.640 --> 01:55:54.560]  Oh, it ain't like, you know, I guess my right to livelihood, I guess,
[01:55:55.200 --> 01:56:03.040]  the way that the judge was telling me, Mrs. Lee, I cannot rule in your favor because there's rules
[01:56:03.040 --> 01:56:08.880]  and procedures set up in this court that constrict me to rule in a certain way.
[01:56:11.440 --> 01:56:18.000]  From reading your legal research, I am confident that you know what you're talking about.
[01:56:20.160 --> 01:56:23.760]  It was just a feeling like, wait, is he telling me, is he talking code right now?
[01:56:25.040 --> 01:56:31.760]  You ruled against everything that I said earlier, but you just, you're admitting right now that
[01:56:31.760 --> 01:56:38.560]  you're confident that everything I said was correct, but you, you had to rule against it
[01:56:38.560 --> 01:56:44.560]  because the way your procedures require you to act.
[01:56:50.560 --> 01:56:54.560]  So he's got, he's got to slither up behind that thin blue line.
[01:56:55.440 --> 01:57:01.200]  Right. And so it's just like you were saying earlier that the lower court runs in a certain
[01:57:01.200 --> 01:57:07.520]  way, the higher court look at the body of law and the rights that you are certain.
[01:57:08.400 --> 01:57:12.240]  So it seemed like the judge was telling me, well, you are certain these rights and we don't,
[01:57:13.040 --> 01:57:15.760]  you didn't assert it in a proper way.
[01:57:18.560 --> 01:57:24.000]  What he's really saying is, is we're not going to accept those.
[01:57:24.560 --> 01:57:26.960]  You're going to have to win it in appeal.
[01:57:26.960 --> 01:57:31.680]  And it sounded like the judge knew full well that you would win this in appeal.
[01:57:32.880 --> 01:57:36.960]  Right. And then he kept on saying, you're not learning capital, do you know how to file a
[01:57:36.960 --> 01:57:43.280]  appeal by yourself? I'm like, no. He's like, do you mind if I assign one for you? I'm like,
[01:57:43.280 --> 01:57:48.320]  you really think that I need that? I really think you should, I said, okay, fine.
[01:57:48.320 --> 01:57:57.840]  I said, okay, fine. And then they set everything up for me and he said, he said, all your,
[01:57:57.840 --> 01:58:03.360]  all your arguments are noted on the record. We're going to get you a copy of the recording.
[01:58:03.920 --> 01:58:11.040]  And I mean, this was, and he even mentioned that you, you, you may have, you may have a
[01:58:11.040 --> 01:58:17.360]  civil action in the, on the other side, but we're talking about the criminal courts right now.
[01:58:17.360 --> 01:58:22.800]  And the officer was dead. He was looking dead to his face because the judge,
[01:58:23.360 --> 01:58:28.400]  I was doing a lot of questioning, the judge realized I was getting out information for the
[01:58:28.400 --> 01:58:35.120]  lawsuit. I didn't care about, I didn't care about the criminal case. And the judge was
[01:58:35.120 --> 01:58:38.640]  allowing it. He was like, I'm going to allow it. I'm going to allow it. I'm like,
[01:58:38.640 --> 01:58:48.160]  and the cop is toast. Okay. We are out of time. Thank you, Olivier. All right. Goodnight everyone.
[01:58:50.160 --> 01:58:56.640]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.640 --> 01:59:02.080]  recovery version. The New Testament recovery version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.080 --> 01:59:08.160]  what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.160 --> 01:59:16.560]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102,
[01:59:16.560 --> 01:59:24.880]  or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000
[01:59:24.880 --> 01:59:30.560]  cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is
[01:59:30.560 --> 01:59:35.760]  truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version,
[01:59:35.760 --> 01:59:48.960]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:48.960 --> 02:00:04.400]  Looking for some truth? You found it. Logosradionetwork.com.