[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:07.000 --> 00:14.000]  Markets for Monday, the 20th of March, 2017, open trading with gold at $1,234.70 an ounce,
[00:14.000 --> 00:21.500]  silver $17.44 an ounce, Texas crude $48.78 a barrel, and Bitcoin is down over the weekend
[00:21.500 --> 00:26.000]  but still over 1,000, currently sitting in 1,036 U.S. currency.
[00:26.000 --> 00:33.000]  Today in history, the year 2003, the invasion of Iraq kicks off in the early hours of the morning.
[00:33.000 --> 00:38.000]  The United States along with the United Kingdom, Australia, and Poland begin military operations in Iraq,
[00:38.000 --> 00:42.000]  leading to the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and the eventual rise of ISIS.
[00:42.000 --> 00:51.000]  The independent U.K.-U.S. group, the Iraq Body Count Project, IBC, estimates that a total of 154,000 to 172,000 civilian deaths
[00:51.000 --> 01:00.000]  have resulted from the March 2003 invasion up until February 2016, with roughly 5,000 U.S. soldiers dying in the same time frame.
[01:00.000 --> 01:04.000]  It is estimated that over $2 trillion U.S. taxpayer dollars have been spent thus far,
[01:04.000 --> 01:10.000]  with the number potentially reaching over $6 trillion in the next decade due to health care for disabled veterans.
[01:14.000 --> 01:20.000]  In recent news, German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement Sunday that there is no debt account at NATO.
[01:20.000 --> 01:22.000]  This came a day after Trump tweeted that, quote,
[01:22.000 --> 01:30.000]  Germany owes vast sums of money to NATO, and the United States must be paid more for the powerful and very expensive defense it provides to Germany.
[01:30.000 --> 01:34.000]  Trump had his meeting with German Chancellor Merkel in Washington on Friday of last week,
[01:34.000 --> 01:41.000]  where the mainstream media went in frenzy as it appeared that Trump refused to give the Chancellor a handshake in the Oval Office for the cameras.
[01:41.000 --> 01:45.000]  Trump did call NATO obsolete and threatened to moderate its commitment to it
[01:45.000 --> 01:51.000]  if partners failed to meet the mandated military spending requirement of 2 percent GDP during this campaign for president,
[01:51.000 --> 01:55.000]  a target the German government has committed to reaching by 2024.
[01:55.000 --> 02:01.000]  The combined wealth of the non-U.S. allies measured in GDP exceeds that of the United States.
[02:01.000 --> 02:06.000]  However, non-U.S. allies together spend less than half of what the United States spends on the military.
[02:06.000 --> 02:14.000]  Members of the Chamani tribe that live in the Amazon jungle in Bolivia have the healthiest hearts in the world,
[02:14.000 --> 02:18.000]  according to a study involving more than 700 of these primitive people.
[02:18.000 --> 02:25.000]  Researchers published a study in the journal The Lancet and have found that nearly 9 out of 10 Chamani people have clear arteries.
[02:25.000 --> 02:31.000]  To put that into comparison, an 80-year-old Chamani has a heart akin to that of an American in their mid-50s.
[02:31.000 --> 02:38.000]  Who would have thought that lower fat intake, little to no sugar, an active lifestyle outdoors with fresh air and sunlight,
[02:38.000 --> 03:02.000]  and no processed food could be good for your heart?
[03:08.000 --> 03:13.000]  This is what happens when you call the cops. You get your rights violated or you all get shot.
[03:13.000 --> 03:18.000]  This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops.
[03:18.000 --> 03:23.000]  This is what happens when you call the cops. You get your rights violated or you all get shot.
[03:23.000 --> 03:28.000]  I'm sick of people being victimized by criminal cops. Psychopathic predators terrorize the neighborhood blocks.
[03:28.000 --> 03:33.000]  They whip with pepper spray, make cuffs, tasers, and glocks. They like serial killers acting out subliminal thoughts.
[03:33.000 --> 03:38.000]  Forget what you charge. These cops have got a license to kill. Witness intimidation means if they can use it, it will.
[03:38.000 --> 03:43.000]  Code of silence means that the pigs will never let out a squeal. And if they go to court, they know the judge will make them a deal.
[03:43.000 --> 03:46.000]  For real. That's why they stoppin' me, lockin' me up, and stoppin' me.
[03:46.000 --> 03:51.000]  Complicatin' my property, talkin' in my demography. Makin' the poor commodities, profitin' off of poverty.
[03:51.000 --> 03:54.000]  And talkin' of policy, support, prison, and economy. Yeah.
[03:54.000 --> 03:59.000]  No one makes money when the violence stops. Hatin' brutality's the way to make a criminal cry.
[03:59.000 --> 04:04.000]  Blood in the gut is how to risk whether they bread at the top. And that's why this is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:04.000 --> 04:12.000]  All right, folks. Good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show. It is March 20th, 2017.
[04:12.000 --> 04:18.000]  The phones are not on just yet. I'm going to take this first segment just to talk a little bit about the fundraiser
[04:18.000 --> 04:22.000]  and some of the things that we need to be aware of and what's going on right now.
[04:22.000 --> 04:26.000]  And hopefully we can go from there after that taking callers.
[04:26.000 --> 04:32.000]  Now, as you know right now, Rule of Law Radio and Logos Radio Network is in the middle of trying to get their
[04:32.000 --> 04:36.000]  beginning-of-the-year fund drive done so that we'll have money to operate for the year.
[04:36.000 --> 04:43.000]  If you have not donated, please consider going to the website and doing so, logosradionetwork.com.
[04:43.000 --> 04:51.000]  All the information is in the top left box. Every $25 donation, get your name into the drawing for the AR-15
[04:51.000 --> 04:56.000]  or one of the two lower receivers that we have in the giveaway.
[04:56.000 --> 05:01.000]  So if you haven't donated $25 or more, please consider doing so.
[05:01.000 --> 05:07.000]  But we'll take any amount that you can spare to help keep us on the air and keep us going.
[05:07.000 --> 05:13.000]  We do not draw a paycheck. We're not corporate sponsored. We're not even very well advertising sponsored.
[05:13.000 --> 05:19.000]  Most of the money we get to operate comes from your donations. So please help keep us here.
[05:19.000 --> 05:27.000]  If the information that we've provided to you is useful, you find it valuable, then please consider donating to keep us here.
[05:27.000 --> 05:31.000]  You can donate to the network as a whole. You can donate to us as individuals.
[05:31.000 --> 05:37.000]  However you want to do it, just go to the Logos Radio Network homepage, click the donations button at the top,
[05:37.000 --> 05:41.000]  and go from there if you want to directly donate to us or to the network.
[05:41.000 --> 05:52.000]  All right, that being said, just remember that the lies are getting bigger as the world continues to turn.
[05:52.000 --> 05:59.000]  The rights of the people are diminishing each and every day.
[05:59.000 --> 06:08.000]  We're asking more and more permission to do that which we already have every inherent right to do.
[06:08.000 --> 06:17.000]  We have had a complete role reversal in this country as to what the Constitution does and to whom it doesn't.
[06:17.000 --> 06:23.000]  We have all these attorneys and prosecutors in courts trying to say that the people don't have a right
[06:23.000 --> 06:29.000]  unless the Constitution specifically gives them that right. They have it completely wrong.
[06:29.000 --> 06:36.000]  They are the ones that have no power to do something, no authority to do something
[06:36.000 --> 06:42.000]  unless the Constitution specifically gives it to them. It is not the other way around.
[06:42.000 --> 06:48.000]  Our rights do not come from either the state or federal constitutions.
[06:48.000 --> 06:57.000]  Right there the argument is completely off kilter, but I will give you three guesses as to who is responsible
[06:57.000 --> 07:07.000]  for that mentality of where our rights come from, and the first two guesses don't count.
[07:07.000 --> 07:16.000]  Every single thing we are having to struggle with is because some attorney wants to raise an issue
[07:16.000 --> 07:22.000]  that has no place in being raised in the first instance, none.
[07:22.000 --> 07:30.000]  They make an argument that is asinine on its face and it only gets support because of the brainwashed masses
[07:30.000 --> 07:39.000]  and those that hide in the same elitist cult that control the system and allows them to get away with it.
[07:39.000 --> 07:45.000]  Yesterday in my class I drew it up on the board in the hope that it would finally dawn on people
[07:45.000 --> 07:52.000]  just how little control over our own lives and government the people have anymore,
[07:52.000 --> 08:01.000]  how little actual ability to participate in our own government the people actually have anymore.
[08:01.000 --> 08:09.000]  And you better come to realize that the problem is not the Vatican, it is not the Pope,
[08:09.000 --> 08:15.000]  it is not the Queen of England, it is not the founding fathers.
[08:15.000 --> 08:27.000]  It is you and me not doing our job and not holding accountable those that are responsible
[08:27.000 --> 08:34.000]  for this degradation and destruction of our rights and our liberty.
[08:34.000 --> 08:42.000]  We have become too ignorant, too apathetic and too laid back at demanding that what is rightfully ours
[08:42.000 --> 08:51.000]  be left alone by those that are supposed to only serve us.
[08:51.000 --> 08:59.000]  You would not hire a butler to work in your home
[08:59.000 --> 09:06.000]  and then let the butler assume that the house in which he works is suddenly his.
[09:06.000 --> 09:14.000]  You would not allow that butler to sell off your property and put that money in his own pocket.
[09:14.000 --> 09:19.000]  You would not let that butler decide how you could spend that money
[09:19.000 --> 09:27.000]  or how much of it you should get to keep and how much of it he should get paid.
[09:27.000 --> 09:34.000]  And even if you gave him the ability to hire and fire other staff members as servants for particular jobs
[09:34.000 --> 09:40.000]  and made him the manager of those other servants, he still doesn't own the house
[09:40.000 --> 09:52.000]  and he still does not have the ultimate say in who stays and who goes if you decide to override him.
[09:52.000 --> 10:01.000]  And yet, we now let the butler act as if he owns the house.
[10:01.000 --> 10:07.000]  The problem is not these patronet theories.
[10:07.000 --> 10:13.000]  It's not. It never will be the problem.
[10:13.000 --> 10:19.000]  Those are nothing but smoke and mirror games to distract you from the fact
[10:19.000 --> 10:29.000]  that a criminal is operating right under your nose with the desire to have you believe
[10:29.000 --> 10:35.000]  that his actions are legitimate when they aren't.
[10:35.000 --> 10:46.000]  And he has gotten together with a band of other criminals to make their entire operation look legitimate.
[10:46.000 --> 10:55.000]  And they are able to succeed because we play along.
[10:55.000 --> 11:00.000]  It's not any more difficult to understand or apply than that.
[11:00.000 --> 11:04.000]  It really isn't.
[11:04.000 --> 11:10.000]  There are a thousand different things that could have been done differently in the Constitution
[11:10.000 --> 11:13.000]  to prevent this from happening.
[11:13.000 --> 11:19.000]  But the reason they were not written into the Constitution was not because the Founding Fathers
[11:19.000 --> 11:26.000]  were short-sighted and didn't expect this very thing to happen.
[11:26.000 --> 11:33.000]  It was because the Founding Fathers had faith in the people that the people would always remain informed
[11:33.000 --> 11:43.000]  and intelligent enough to recognize oppression and tyranny whenever it raised its head and do something about it
[11:43.000 --> 11:49.000]  before it became a problem.
[11:49.000 --> 11:52.000]  The Constitution is not short-sighted.
[11:52.000 --> 12:01.000]  It is a document of faith in the people to govern themselves.
[12:01.000 --> 12:10.000]  But when you relinquish that to the servant to manage everything for you, to dictate how you are to deal with it,
[12:10.000 --> 12:21.000]  you convert yourself into children that need a parent.
[12:21.000 --> 12:32.000]  There is not a single one of these patronet theories that would hold a drop of water against that rationalization right there.
[12:32.000 --> 12:41.000]  Because if you think a criminal will follow any set of rules, no matter what it's based on,
[12:41.000 --> 12:47.000]  your patronet theory or actual law, if they're willing to violate the actual law that's written black and white
[12:47.000 --> 12:55.000]  right in front of you, why would you think that they would not violate anything else that you're concocting out there out of thin air?
[12:55.000 --> 12:59.000]  How many times do I have to say that on this show?
[12:59.000 --> 13:03.000]  How many different ways do I have to say that on this show?
[13:03.000 --> 13:12.000]  A criminal is a criminal no matter what he's doing, no matter where he's doing it.
[13:12.000 --> 13:20.000]  And no matter what rules you try to say, he is avoiding or rewriting or changing to do what he does.
[13:20.000 --> 13:23.000]  He doesn't need the rules to do what he does.
[13:23.000 --> 13:29.000]  He only needs the rules if he's going to make what he's doing appear legitimate.
[13:29.000 --> 13:35.000]  And the thing is, they don't even care about looking legitimate anymore.
[13:35.000 --> 13:41.000]  If you don't believe that, all you've got to do is look at a case where we've got a murder by a cop.
[13:41.000 --> 13:49.000]  Look at any case where a government official does something illegal and see what happens to them versus what happens to one of us.
[13:49.000 --> 13:56.000]  See how the law gets applied differently to those that serve government, the criminal side,
[13:56.000 --> 14:02.000]  and those that serve the people on the people side.
[14:02.000 --> 14:09.000]  There is a huge chasm between either of those.
[14:09.000 --> 14:21.000]  A cop was sentenced for raping and sexually abusing a 13-year-old girl to three years in prison,
[14:21.000 --> 14:37.000]  whereas we would get 20 years for transporting a quarter pound of marijuana across a state line just to smoke for ourselves.
[14:37.000 --> 14:41.000]  Do you not see a problem here?
[14:41.000 --> 14:50.000]  They lie, they cheat, they steal, they murder, and they sanction it themselves to make it legitimate.
[14:50.000 --> 14:58.000]  The mob is what is leading this country.
[14:58.000 --> 15:09.000]  And you think the Pope has to be a problem, that the Queen of England has to be a problem.
[15:09.000 --> 15:12.000]  How do you get there?
[15:12.000 --> 15:25.000]  Why isn't my explanation way easier, way more simple, and way more likely than those idiotic arguments?
[15:25.000 --> 15:33.000]  How difficult is it to understand that if you have a hand in making the rules, enforcing the rules,
[15:33.000 --> 15:39.000]  and interpreting the rules, that you have complete control of the game.
[15:39.000 --> 15:48.000]  And you don't care what the rules actually say because you can adapt them whenever you like to whatever you like
[15:48.000 --> 15:52.000]  and get the outcome that you like.
[15:52.000 --> 16:02.000]  Why do you need any of these other BS things that everybody keeps throwing out there to do that?
[16:02.000 --> 16:09.000]  I drew the departments of government up on the board yesterday, the legislative, the executive, and the judicial,
[16:09.000 --> 16:16.000]  and we have lost 100% access and control of the judicial department.
[16:16.000 --> 16:24.000]  The people can no longer serve in any viable position in the judiciary to change anything.
[16:24.000 --> 16:28.000]  We cannot sit in any court of record as a judge.
[16:28.000 --> 16:34.000]  We cannot act as a prosecutor or even as a defense attorney on behalf of anybody
[16:34.000 --> 16:41.000]  because the attorneys keep that locked up tightly for themselves.
[16:41.000 --> 16:48.000]  We've lost at least 75 to 80% of our legislature to attorneys.
[16:48.000 --> 16:50.000]  They control it.
[16:50.000 --> 16:52.000]  I'll be right back after this break.
[16:52.000 --> 16:55.000]  I'm going to go ahead and turn the phones on, but I'll rant a little bit more when we get back,
[16:55.000 --> 17:11.000]  so y'all hang in there.
[17:25.000 --> 17:47.000]  Bye-bye, yucky cookies.
[17:47.000 --> 17:59.000]  No cookies for me.
[18:17.000 --> 18:32.000]  No cookies for me.
[18:32.000 --> 18:44.000]  No cookies for me.
[18:44.000 --> 19:11.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network, the Logos Radio Network.com.
[19:11.000 --> 19:16.000]  Yeah, the storm on the loose, the sirens in my head
[19:16.000 --> 19:20.000]  Wrapped up in silence, all the circuits in bed
[19:20.000 --> 19:28.000]  Can I be told, my whole life spins into a prayer bed?
[19:28.000 --> 19:32.000]  Have my feelings to this white ice at home
[19:32.000 --> 19:36.000]  Played in the madhouse, feel like he's on
[19:36.000 --> 19:41.000]  Like he's just getting home from the moon and star
[19:41.000 --> 19:44.000]  Girl, when you're not at home
[19:44.000 --> 19:48.000]  Boy, you will come home
[19:48.000 --> 19:53.000]  When the bullet hits the bone
[19:53.000 --> 19:56.000]  You will come home
[19:56.000 --> 20:00.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[20:00.000 --> 20:05.000]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[20:05.000 --> 20:09.000]  Now to wrap up that beginning segment rant, think about that.
[20:09.000 --> 20:12.000]  We have lost 100% of our judicial department.
[20:12.000 --> 20:15.000]  The people no longer serve any purpose in the judiciary whatsoever
[20:15.000 --> 20:18.000]  that will make any difference of any kind.
[20:18.000 --> 20:24.000]  We cannot sit in a court of decision based upon the laws the legislature has written.
[20:24.000 --> 20:27.000]  The Constitution doesn't forbid us to do it.
[20:27.000 --> 20:34.000]  The attorneys through the legislature have forbidden anyone but attorneys to hold those positions.
[20:34.000 --> 20:39.000]  Even though it is the people's Department of Government.
[20:39.000 --> 20:48.000]  Those same attorneys control 75 to 80% minimum of our legislative body.
[20:48.000 --> 20:52.000]  They write the laws that allow this to happen.
[20:52.000 --> 21:00.000]  And then our chief executive officers, our governor, our AG, they also are attorneys.
[21:00.000 --> 21:04.000]  Our lieutenant governor most of the time is an attorney.
[21:04.000 --> 21:10.000]  And when they're not, what power do they have? Nada.
[21:10.000 --> 21:19.000]  So you see, the people no longer have access to any viable part of their government
[21:19.000 --> 21:25.000]  to ensure that our rights and liberties are protected.
[21:25.000 --> 21:28.000]  The attorneys have stolen all of it.
[21:28.000 --> 21:36.000]  The only elected offices that we have that we can access is the sheriff.
[21:36.000 --> 21:39.000]  It's the only one.
[21:39.000 --> 21:41.000]  But guess what?
[21:41.000 --> 21:45.000]  The legislature illegally and unconstitutionally created a statute
[21:45.000 --> 21:55.000]  that allows another elected official to remove our elected sheriff if he won't play ball.
[21:55.000 --> 21:57.000]  That's right.
[21:57.000 --> 22:03.000]  The legislature created a statute that allows a district judge to remove a sheriff from office
[22:03.000 --> 22:10.000]  by mere court order despite the fact that that sheriff is constitutionally elected
[22:10.000 --> 22:19.000]  and his office is absolutely equal to in every way to that district judge's office
[22:19.000 --> 22:23.000]  because he's a judicial officer too.
[22:23.000 --> 22:25.000]  He is not subordinate to the courts.
[22:25.000 --> 22:27.000]  He is not there to serve the courts.
[22:27.000 --> 22:30.000]  He is one of the people's elected representatives.
[22:30.000 --> 22:39.000]  How can the legislature authorize his removal by a district judge?
[22:39.000 --> 22:42.000]  I don't see how it's constitutionally possible.
[22:42.000 --> 22:46.000]  There's no authority in the Constitution for a court or the legislature
[22:46.000 --> 22:50.000]  to remove a sheriff from office that's been elected
[22:50.000 --> 22:56.000]  unless that officer has been charged with an actual crime.
[22:56.000 --> 23:04.000]  But the statute does not say he has to be charged with an actual crime.
[23:04.000 --> 23:11.000]  So as you can see, the attorneys have rigged the game entirely in their favor
[23:11.000 --> 23:18.000]  to ensure that our rights are under their heel
[23:18.000 --> 23:21.000]  and are effective only at their whim.
[23:21.000 --> 23:24.000]  Once again, we don't need the Vatican.
[23:24.000 --> 23:25.000]  We don't need the queen.
[23:25.000 --> 23:26.000]  We don't need the pope.
[23:26.000 --> 23:27.000]  We don't need the banks.
[23:27.000 --> 23:31.000]  We don't need anybody else to cause us a problem with that
[23:31.000 --> 23:38.000]  because these idiots are willing to do it entirely on their own.
[23:38.000 --> 23:40.000]  They don't need directors from anybody to do it
[23:40.000 --> 23:45.000]  because they control the system that allows them to do it.
[23:45.000 --> 23:50.000]  And I personally have a problem with that.
[23:50.000 --> 23:55.000]  All right, that being said, first in line is Barrett in Arizona.
[23:55.000 --> 23:58.000]  Barrett, what can we do for you?
[23:58.000 --> 24:04.000]  Yeah, I called last week and I'm restoring a motorcycle.
[24:04.000 --> 24:05.000]  I want to be overrided.
[24:05.000 --> 24:08.000]  I heard that the Supreme Court has ruled
[24:08.000 --> 24:11.000]  you don't have to have a guard's license, insurance or anything.
[24:11.000 --> 24:13.000]  Don't be listening to the internet clabber-jabber.
[24:13.000 --> 24:15.000]  That is not what is correct.
[24:15.000 --> 24:18.000]  That is not what the cases say.
[24:18.000 --> 24:23.000]  You better be doing better study than that.
[24:23.000 --> 24:25.000]  Okay, I just...
[24:25.000 --> 24:30.000]  Well, I have a suspension for a very old DUI about 10 years ago.
[24:30.000 --> 24:31.000]  I revoked.
[24:31.000 --> 24:38.000]  And I'm just wondering if I can, you know,
[24:38.000 --> 24:43.000]  be overrided without going through all the...
[24:43.000 --> 24:46.000]  Well, how much of Arizona law have you studied?
[24:46.000 --> 24:48.000]  How much of Arizona statutory
[24:48.000 --> 24:51.000]  and legislative history on those laws have you studied?
[24:51.000 --> 24:53.000]  I haven't. I haven't.
[24:53.000 --> 24:54.000]  There you go.
[24:54.000 --> 24:56.000]  That's why you don't have an answer.
[24:56.000 --> 24:58.000]  And that's why I can't give you one
[24:58.000 --> 25:02.000]  because I spent my last 20 years studying Texas and Connecticut
[25:02.000 --> 25:06.000]  and a couple other places but not Arizona.
[25:06.000 --> 25:10.000]  What should I look for when I decide?
[25:10.000 --> 25:15.000]  I can't tell you what to look for other than, you know,
[25:15.000 --> 25:17.000]  the seminar material that I put together,
[25:17.000 --> 25:19.000]  the book that I wrote for that
[25:19.000 --> 25:23.000]  tells you how to find this stuff and how to look it up.
[25:23.000 --> 25:26.000]  It's a drawn-out process.
[25:26.000 --> 25:29.000]  It's not something I can tell you in an hour on the air.
[25:29.000 --> 25:30.000]  It's just not.
[25:30.000 --> 25:35.000]  It took us two and a half days to present that material in that book.
[25:35.000 --> 25:36.000]  Okay?
[25:36.000 --> 25:37.000]  Okay.
[25:37.000 --> 25:41.000]  If I buy this book, can I convert it to Arizona law
[25:41.000 --> 25:42.000]  and be able to look up...
[25:42.000 --> 25:44.000]  Well, that's the whole purpose of it.
[25:44.000 --> 25:46.000]  It's written so that you know what to look for
[25:46.000 --> 25:48.000]  and how to find it so you can research it
[25:48.000 --> 25:50.000]  along the lines in your state.
[25:50.000 --> 25:53.000]  That's how it's written.
[25:53.000 --> 25:54.000]  So is it...
[25:54.000 --> 25:57.000]  I mean, it's true that I don't have to have a license to travel, right?
[25:57.000 --> 25:59.000]  I mean, that's true, isn't it?
[25:59.000 --> 26:03.000]  It is true, but it's not the way they look at it
[26:03.000 --> 26:06.000]  because they don't ever look at it as a right to travel.
[26:06.000 --> 26:09.000]  And like I said, what they argue is
[26:09.000 --> 26:14.000]  is that the Constitution doesn't specifically give the people a right to travel.
[26:14.000 --> 26:16.000]  It doesn't have to.
[26:16.000 --> 26:21.000]  The Constitution is not the source of our rights or our liberties.
[26:21.000 --> 26:25.000]  It doesn't limit the people in any way whatsoever.
[26:25.000 --> 26:30.000]  That's the part that every single state seems to forget.
[26:30.000 --> 26:34.000]  The limitations in the Constitution are specifically directed at government
[26:34.000 --> 26:40.000]  and governmental actors, not the people.
[26:40.000 --> 26:44.000]  So it doesn't matter what the Constitution doesn't say we can do
[26:44.000 --> 26:47.000]  because we have a right to do anything
[26:47.000 --> 26:54.000]  as long as it isn't harming someone else or their property.
[26:54.000 --> 26:59.000]  But the problem is, is the system being controlled by the individuals that it is
[26:59.000 --> 27:02.000]  tries to make it appear that that isn't the case.
[27:02.000 --> 27:10.000]  And right now, too many Americans have been suckered into thinking it is the case.
[27:10.000 --> 27:24.000]  That's why right now, most of the average IQ in America operates at a subterranean level.
[27:24.000 --> 27:39.000]  So while the principle is dead on, the way to get there is filled with land mines.
[27:39.000 --> 27:48.000]  Does this book help you to keep your bike from getting towed?
[27:48.000 --> 27:51.000]  The book doesn't help you with anything of the sort.
[27:51.000 --> 27:56.000]  It teaches you how to read and understand statutes and legislative enactments.
[27:56.000 --> 27:59.000]  It teaches you how to read your state constitution.
[27:59.000 --> 28:04.000]  It teaches you how to apply it, how to use it to show that certain applications
[28:04.000 --> 28:10.000]  or interpretations of statute conflict with constitutional principles.
[28:10.000 --> 28:15.000]  Therefore, that interpretation or application is wholly unconstitutional
[28:15.000 --> 28:18.000]  and invalid on its face.
[28:18.000 --> 28:22.000]  But until you understand what your constitution tells them they can do,
[28:22.000 --> 28:24.000]  what it prevents them from doing,
[28:24.000 --> 28:32.000]  and what protections it affords you from what they do, you can't make that argument.
[28:32.000 --> 28:41.000]  I want to get this book and I want to study, read it.
[28:41.000 --> 28:45.000]  Does it tell you, so if they do tow your bike away and they do take you to jail,
[28:45.000 --> 28:48.000]  does it tell you how to sue?
[28:48.000 --> 28:51.000]  No, it is not about a lawsuit.
[28:51.000 --> 28:57.000]  This teaches you how to understand law so that you can figure out how to do all those things for yourself.
[28:57.000 --> 29:04.000]  It is the legal course that they should teach you in grade school and don't.
[29:04.000 --> 29:10.000]  Americans are intentionally left in the dark about how the system of law has been set up
[29:10.000 --> 29:17.000]  and how it works in this country so that you have to go through one of their legal mouthpieces
[29:17.000 --> 29:23.000]  and let yourself be led around by the nose by how they want you to think it works
[29:23.000 --> 29:30.000]  and what they want you to think it means and says.
[29:30.000 --> 29:36.000]  The book is about teaching you how to prove their methods are incorrect
[29:36.000 --> 29:46.000]  and how to better able, better arm and prepare you to make that argument.
[29:46.000 --> 29:50.000]  That book is not about lawsuits, it is about learning law.
[29:50.000 --> 29:52.000]  Hang on a second Barrett, I got a break.
[29:52.000 --> 30:03.000]  All right folks, y'all hold on, we'll be right back after this break.
[30:03.000 --> 30:09.000]  Every inbox is plagued by scanned emails offering big bucks in exchange for a small upfront loan.
[30:09.000 --> 30:13.000]  But why do these swindlers always tell you they're Nigerian?
[30:13.000 --> 30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll have the answer in just a moment.
[30:16.000 --> 30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.000 --> 30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:38.000]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[30:38.000 --> 30:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:49.000]  Dear Mrs. Doe, I work at the Nigerian Department of Oil
[30:49.000 --> 30:53.000]  and I desperately need to transfer $100 million to the United States.
[30:53.000 --> 30:56.000]  But I'm terminally ill and I can't do it alone.
[30:56.000 --> 31:00.000]  If you'd email me your bank details and a small amount to cover the transfer,
[31:00.000 --> 31:03.000]  I'd gladly offer you a 10% share.
[31:03.000 --> 31:07.000]  Incredibly, online scams like this one are hugely successful.
[31:07.000 --> 31:11.000]  But haven't you wondered why these crooks still identify themselves as Nigerian
[31:11.000 --> 31:14.000]  despite that country's awful reputation for fraud?
[31:14.000 --> 31:17.000]  Answer, by chasing away all but the most gullible,
[31:17.000 --> 31:21.000]  scammers make sure they're dealing with people who are extra clueless.
[31:21.000 --> 31:24.000]  And they milk that cluelessness all the way to the bank.
[31:24.000 --> 31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:54.000 --> 31:58.000]  To save you space, time and money, call 888-910-4367.
[31:58.000 --> 32:03.000]  Only at NUSA.org.
[32:03.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:09.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[32:09.000 --> 32:11.000]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[32:11.000 --> 32:14.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:14.000 --> 32:17.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:17.000 --> 32:19.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:19.000 --> 32:21.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:21.000 --> 32:24.000]  The courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce
[32:24.000 --> 32:26.000]  and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:32.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.000 --> 32:34.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:38.000 --> 32:41.000]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:43.000 --> 32:46.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:48.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.000]  hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:53.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[32:53.000 --> 32:55.000]  from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 32:58.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society
[32:58.000 --> 33:00.000]  we all want and deserve.
[33:00.000 --> 33:22.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:22.000 --> 33:33.000]  We're on the highway to hell, highway to hell.
[33:33.000 --> 33:53.000]  Don't stop me.
[33:53.000 --> 33:56.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[33:56.000 --> 33:58.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:58.000 --> 34:02.000]  And right now we are speaking with Barrett in Arizona.
[34:02.000 --> 34:14.000]  All right, Barrett, continue on.
[34:14.000 --> 34:16.000]  The seminar course is 250 bucks.
[34:16.000 --> 34:18.000]  It's not just a book.
[34:18.000 --> 34:21.000]  It's over 400 different legal pleadings
[34:21.000 --> 34:24.000]  that teach you how to make the particular arguments.
[34:24.000 --> 34:26.000]  They're all based on Texas law,
[34:26.000 --> 34:30.000]  but if you read them and study the book and those motions
[34:30.000 --> 34:34.000]  and figure out what the relevant law is in your state,
[34:34.000 --> 34:41.000]  they're very easy to modify for use in your state.
[34:41.000 --> 34:45.000]  But it does require work, effort and understanding on your part.
[34:45.000 --> 34:48.000]  It's not something you're just going to fall into and have.
[34:48.000 --> 34:50.000]  You've got to work to get it.
[34:50.000 --> 34:55.000]  There's no way I could sit down and learn this for all 50 states.
[34:55.000 --> 34:58.000]  It's not possible.
[34:58.000 --> 35:01.000]  Aren't they kind of close pretty much to the Texas law?
[35:01.000 --> 35:03.000]  They're similar.
[35:03.000 --> 35:05.000]  But they're different in some ways
[35:05.000 --> 35:08.000]  and very similar in other ways.
[35:08.000 --> 35:11.000]  The overall gist is generally the same
[35:11.000 --> 35:15.000]  because the National Bar Association set the template
[35:15.000 --> 35:19.000]  that 90% of the states use to do their legislative acts.
[35:19.000 --> 35:23.000]  So the statute writing methods are fairly standardized.
[35:23.000 --> 35:26.000]  The language is fairly standardized.
[35:26.000 --> 35:29.000]  But you've got to pay close attention to things,
[35:29.000 --> 35:32.000]  and there will be parts that appear in one state
[35:32.000 --> 35:36.000]  that don't appear in another state.
[35:36.000 --> 35:37.000]  Okay.
[35:37.000 --> 35:41.000]  Hey, what if they would say if I get my bike together
[35:41.000 --> 35:44.000]  and I was going to like go without a plate,
[35:44.000 --> 35:46.000]  but I'm thinking, well, maybe...
[35:46.000 --> 35:50.000]  Well, I'm thinking this is what you need to understand.
[35:50.000 --> 35:56.000]  How many years have you spent training to box?
[35:56.000 --> 35:58.000]  None.
[35:58.000 --> 36:00.000]  So why in the world would you pick a fight
[36:00.000 --> 36:05.000]  with Muhammad Ali in a ring?
[36:05.000 --> 36:07.000]  I want my liberty.
[36:07.000 --> 36:10.000]  So you think that even though you want your liberty,
[36:10.000 --> 36:13.000]  you're prepared to get it by stepping in the ring
[36:13.000 --> 36:16.000]  with Muhammad Ali if he was alive today
[36:16.000 --> 36:19.000]  and in his prime the way you are right now?
[36:19.000 --> 36:25.000]  Hell, we'll even go with Mike Tyson or Joe Foreman at this point.
[36:25.000 --> 36:28.000]  Well, Muhammad Ali was the best as far as I can tell.
[36:28.000 --> 36:30.000]  Well, I'm not worried about who's the best.
[36:30.000 --> 36:34.000]  I'm worried about which one you think you can take.
[36:34.000 --> 36:35.000]  None of them.
[36:35.000 --> 36:36.000]  Okay.
[36:36.000 --> 36:38.000]  So if you would recognize that you're not prepared
[36:38.000 --> 36:40.000]  for that kind of fight,
[36:40.000 --> 36:46.000]  why would you pick it in the first place?
[36:46.000 --> 36:48.000]  I guess I wouldn't want to.
[36:48.000 --> 36:49.000]  Right.
[36:49.000 --> 36:53.000]  And that's what you're doing, doing what you're doing now
[36:53.000 --> 36:56.000]  and not being prepared and trained for it.
[36:56.000 --> 36:57.000]  I don't know.
[36:57.000 --> 37:00.000]  I was just hoping I could get some wisdom
[37:00.000 --> 37:02.000]  to keep the road tires from taking my...
[37:02.000 --> 37:04.000]  Well, you can get all kinds of wisdom.
[37:04.000 --> 37:09.000]  Wisdom doesn't do you any good though if you don't earn it.
[37:09.000 --> 37:11.000]  Unearned wisdom is not wisdom.
[37:11.000 --> 37:13.000]  It's information.
[37:13.000 --> 37:17.000]  And information is not practical use and application practice.
[37:17.000 --> 37:25.000]  And you got to have both to make a fighter.
[37:25.000 --> 37:27.000]  And that's the problem.
[37:27.000 --> 37:30.000]  Information alone, you might know everything,
[37:30.000 --> 37:35.000]  but you don't have a clue how to use it.
[37:35.000 --> 37:37.000]  Well, I know where we're being taken
[37:37.000 --> 37:39.000]  and it's been that way for over 100 years.
[37:39.000 --> 37:42.000]  Well, I'm not arguing whether or not we're being taken.
[37:42.000 --> 37:44.000]  I thought I started to show off pretty much on the message
[37:44.000 --> 37:47.000]  we are being taken over.
[37:47.000 --> 37:51.000]  But the fact remains that you cannot fight those
[37:51.000 --> 37:58.000]  that are doing what they are doing with no skills.
[37:58.000 --> 38:03.000]  And until you learn this inside and out and how to use it,
[38:03.000 --> 38:05.000]  you don't have any skills.
[38:05.000 --> 38:07.000]  The information is available,
[38:07.000 --> 38:10.000]  but it does you no good to have it when you have no idea
[38:10.000 --> 38:17.000]  where and when to use it or how to use it.
[38:17.000 --> 38:19.000]  You understand?
[38:19.000 --> 38:22.000]  Don't pick a fight you're not prepared to fight.
[38:22.000 --> 38:30.000]  I wish I could get a little bit, I don't know, 250.
[38:30.000 --> 38:35.000]  I mean, I have to really dig deep through that.
[38:35.000 --> 38:37.000]  Well, I understand.
[38:37.000 --> 38:39.000]  But the issue here is it's the cheapest legal education
[38:39.000 --> 38:41.000]  you're ever going to get.
[38:41.000 --> 38:45.000]  Even your traffic fine would probably cost you more than that.
[38:45.000 --> 38:46.000]  I need to get that.
[38:46.000 --> 38:48.000]  Anyway, sorry, thank you.
[38:48.000 --> 38:50.000]  You're welcome.
[38:50.000 --> 38:56.000]  All right, now that being said, let's get to William in Texas.
[38:56.000 --> 38:59.000]  I'm sorry, Steve in Texas is next in line here.
[38:59.000 --> 39:01.000]  Steve, what do you got?
[39:01.000 --> 39:08.000]  Oh, yeah, I'm looking here at Chapter 28 of the Texas Code.
[39:08.000 --> 39:11.000]  What Texas Code?
[39:11.000 --> 39:12.000]  Texas Code.
[39:12.000 --> 39:15.000]  Which Texas Code?
[39:15.000 --> 39:17.000]  The Code of Criminal Procedure.
[39:17.000 --> 39:19.000]  Okay.
[39:19.000 --> 39:27.000]  And I'm trying to see how to buy time and get like a continuance.
[39:27.000 --> 39:30.000]  In Chapter 28, in Article 29...
[39:30.000 --> 39:33.000]  Chapter 29 is about continuances, not 28.
[39:33.000 --> 39:35.000]  Right.
[39:35.000 --> 39:38.000]  But I'm looking here, it says for pretrial.
[39:38.000 --> 39:42.000]  And it says, in Section 1, the court may set any criminal case
[39:42.000 --> 39:46.000]  for pretrial hearing before it is set for trial upon its merit.
[39:46.000 --> 39:47.000]  Yeah.
[39:47.000 --> 39:51.000]  Direct the defendant and his attorney, if any of record,
[39:51.000 --> 39:55.000]  and the state's attorney to appear before the court at any time
[39:55.000 --> 40:00.000]  and place stated in the court's order for conference and hearing.
[40:00.000 --> 40:03.000]  The defendant must be present at the arraignment,
[40:03.000 --> 40:09.000]  and his presence is required during any pretrial proceeding.
[40:09.000 --> 40:13.000]  The pretrial hearing shall be to determine any of the following matters.
[40:13.000 --> 40:15.000]  And then I go down to number 5.
[40:15.000 --> 40:21.000]  And it says, motion for continuance either by the state or defendant,
[40:21.000 --> 40:26.000]  semi-colon, provided that grounds for continuance not existing
[40:26.000 --> 40:32.000]  or not known at the time may be presented and considered at any time
[40:32.000 --> 40:35.000]  before the defendant announces ready for trial.
[40:35.000 --> 40:41.000]  Now, what I'm trying to figure out on that is if you're not ready for trial,
[40:41.000 --> 40:46.000]  let's say you want to buy time to set up your defense,
[40:46.000 --> 40:53.000]  is this motion, this clause 5 here, is that saying that you can go
[40:53.000 --> 41:02.000]  to this pretrial hearing and present a motion for a continuance?
[41:02.000 --> 41:07.000]  You don't have to go to the pretrial hearing to present a motion for a continuance.
[41:07.000 --> 41:11.000]  You can request a continuance at that time, sure.
[41:11.000 --> 41:13.000]  But here's the deal.
[41:13.000 --> 41:18.000]  Texas law very clearly states that all motions for continuance must be
[41:18.000 --> 41:23.000]  in writing and must be verified under oath,
[41:23.000 --> 41:31.000]  that the reason for the request for continuance is not for the purpose of delay.
[41:31.000 --> 41:34.000]  So you can write the motion and take it with you at the pretrial
[41:34.000 --> 41:37.000]  and put it in there, but there's no requirement.
[41:37.000 --> 41:43.000]  You can ask for a continuance for the pretrial itself.
[41:43.000 --> 41:48.000]  But you have to make sure that the court grants the motion.
[41:48.000 --> 41:52.000]  Otherwise, you better show up at that date if you haven't received
[41:52.000 --> 41:57.000]  any notice that the continuance was granted.
[41:57.000 --> 41:58.000]  Okay.
[41:58.000 --> 42:01.000]  Now, can you clarify this?
[42:01.000 --> 42:06.000]  It says provided that grounds for continuance not existing
[42:06.000 --> 42:10.000]  or not known at the time may be presented and considered at any time
[42:10.000 --> 42:14.000]  before the defendant announces ready for trial.
[42:14.000 --> 42:22.000]  Does that mean if you don't really know what your reason is?
[42:22.000 --> 42:24.000]  No, it does not.
[42:24.000 --> 42:25.000]  You're not ready?
[42:25.000 --> 42:27.000]  It does not.
[42:27.000 --> 42:31.000]  What it means is if you discover new evidence, a new witness,
[42:31.000 --> 42:36.000]  something that came up unexpectedly that could alter the way the course
[42:36.000 --> 42:41.000]  of the case will go, then you can file a continuance to get that
[42:41.000 --> 42:47.000]  information in the proper order and proper use format for your trial.
[42:47.000 --> 42:50.000]  So you can file a request for that purpose.
[42:50.000 --> 42:54.000]  If you filed a motion for discovery that the other side has not
[42:54.000 --> 42:58.000]  responded to in a timely manner, you can file a continuance because
[42:58.000 --> 43:03.000]  discovery has not been forthcoming from the opposing counsel.
[43:03.000 --> 43:04.000]  Okay.
[43:04.000 --> 43:09.000]  You have to have a valid lawful reason for the continuance.
[43:09.000 --> 43:14.000]  It can't just be I'm just not ready yet.
[43:14.000 --> 43:17.000]  Okay.
[43:17.000 --> 43:18.000]  Okay.
[43:18.000 --> 43:20.000]  Well, that's what I wanted to clear up.
[43:20.000 --> 43:21.000]  Okay.
[43:21.000 --> 43:22.000]  Okay, thank you.
[43:22.000 --> 43:24.000]  Yes, sir.
[43:24.000 --> 43:25.000]  All right.
[43:25.000 --> 43:28.000]  Now, that being said, let's go to William in Texas.
[43:28.000 --> 43:30.000]  William, what do you got?
[43:30.000 --> 43:33.000]  I got a mess, Eddie.
[43:33.000 --> 43:34.000]  All right.
[43:34.000 --> 43:35.000]  Well, hang on just a sec.
[43:35.000 --> 43:36.000]  That's my break music there.
[43:36.000 --> 43:38.000]  So let me get this break over, and I'll pick it up with you on the
[43:38.000 --> 43:39.000]  other side, okay?
[43:39.000 --> 43:40.000]  All right.
[43:40.000 --> 43:41.000]  All right, folks.
[43:41.000 --> 43:45.000]  Calling number is 512-646-1984.
[43:45.000 --> 43:48.000]  We're going to take us a minute or two break, and then we will be
[43:48.000 --> 43:49.000]  right back.
[43:49.000 --> 43:50.000]  So y'all hang in there.
[43:50.000 --> 43:53.000]  This is Monday Night Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig.
[43:53.000 --> 44:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:00.000 --> 44:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.000 --> 44:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the
[44:07.000 --> 44:11.000]  affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how
[44:11.000 --> 44:14.000]  in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.000 --> 44:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.000 --> 44:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.000 --> 44:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[44:27.000 --> 44:31.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of
[44:31.000 --> 44:33.000]  case-winning experience.
[44:33.000 --> 44:37.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[44:37.000 --> 44:41.000]  understand about the principles and practices that control our
[44:41.000 --> 44:42.000]  American courts.
[44:42.000 --> 44:47.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms
[44:47.000 --> 44:51.000]  for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.000 --> 44:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call
[44:56.000 --> 45:03.000]  toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.000 --> 45:07.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I
[45:07.000 --> 45:11.000]  would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe
[45:11.000 --> 45:14.000]  Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas, buying Brave New Books and
[45:14.000 --> 45:17.000]  Chase Paints to see all our fantastic health and wellness products
[45:17.000 --> 45:19.000]  with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:22.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in
[45:22.000 --> 45:23.000]  alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:26.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our
[45:26.000 --> 45:30.000]  Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal
[45:30.000 --> 45:31.000]  silver and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:38.000]  Call 512-264-4043, or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:47.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and
[45:47.000 --> 46:01.000]  our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:17.000 --> 46:22.000]  I'll take you reading the news today.
[46:22.000 --> 46:26.000]  They say there's danger down our way.
[46:26.000 --> 46:31.000]  But I can see the fire's still light.
[46:31.000 --> 46:34.000]  Burning into the night.
[46:34.000 --> 46:41.000]  There's too many men, too many people making too many problems.
[46:41.000 --> 46:47.000]  And I'm about to have to go around.
[46:47.000 --> 46:52.000]  I can see this is a land of confusion.
[46:52.000 --> 46:56.000]  This is the world we live in.
[46:56.000 --> 47:01.000]  And these are the hands we give them.
[47:01.000 --> 47:02.000]  Hi, folks.
[47:02.000 --> 47:03.000]  We are back.
[47:03.000 --> 47:05.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[47:05.000 --> 47:08.000]  And we most certainly are in the land of confusion.
[47:08.000 --> 47:10.000]  People don't know what gender they are.
[47:10.000 --> 47:12.000]  They don't know what shape the earth is.
[47:12.000 --> 47:15.000]  They don't know how the legal system has been used to steal their
[47:15.000 --> 47:16.000]  liberty.
[47:16.000 --> 47:21.000]  And then they come up with cockamamie theories to validate any
[47:21.000 --> 47:22.000]  and all of the above.
[47:22.000 --> 47:23.000]  Lord have mercy.
[47:23.000 --> 47:27.000]  We are definitely living in the land of confusion.
[47:27.000 --> 47:28.000]  All right.
[47:28.000 --> 47:31.000]  That being said, let's get back on board with William in Texas.
[47:31.000 --> 47:34.000]  All right, William, go ahead.
[47:34.000 --> 47:35.000]  Hi.
[47:34.000 --> 47:37.000]  Let me start so that the listeners aren't behind.
[47:37.000 --> 47:41.000]  On December 8th of 2016, I was pulled over, received a citation for
[47:41.000 --> 47:43.000]  invalid license.
[47:43.000 --> 47:49.000]  About December 16th or 17th, I received a currency notice from the
[47:49.000 --> 47:50.000]  municipal court.
[47:50.000 --> 47:55.000]  They were asking for $566, which exceeds the amount authorized by
[47:55.000 --> 47:56.000]  law.
[47:56.000 --> 48:00.000]  So I did a judicial complaint against the original judge.
[48:00.000 --> 48:08.000]  The judge on the 20th did a reset to another judge for a trial on
[48:08.000 --> 48:17.000]  January 23rd of 2017 and a jury docket for March 20th.
[48:17.000 --> 48:23.000]  Then the court had a court date on the 4th where they dismissed, now
[48:23.000 --> 48:26.000]  this is January 4th of 2017.
[48:26.000 --> 48:33.000]  They filed a motion for dismissal and it states other refiles as no
[48:33.000 --> 48:34.000]  driver's license.
[48:34.000 --> 48:37.000]  It's then signed by the second judge.
[48:37.000 --> 48:40.000]  Then, but they never changed the complaint.
[48:40.000 --> 48:43.000]  They didn't change the citation.
[48:43.000 --> 48:46.000]  They didn't change any of the documents required.
[48:46.000 --> 48:50.000]  It's underneath 45.019, criminal procedures.
[48:50.000 --> 48:57.000]  So the other day I received and found out that on the 11th of
[48:57.000 --> 49:04.000]  February, the officer who issued the ticket redid his ticket but
[49:04.000 --> 49:06.000]  changed the case number.
[49:06.000 --> 49:08.000]  The police case number is still the same.
[49:08.000 --> 49:11.000]  He did a Kerrville Police Department affidavit, a probable
[49:11.000 --> 49:12.000]  cause complaint.
[49:12.000 --> 49:14.000]  It is not notarized.
[49:14.000 --> 49:18.000]  In it is the same language as they saw on December 8th, 2016.
[49:18.000 --> 49:22.000]  Wait a minute, the probable cause affidavit can't be notarized.
[49:22.000 --> 49:26.000]  It has to be signed in front of the magistrate, I believe.
[49:26.000 --> 49:31.000]  Even so, he can't be the only signature on the probable cause
[49:31.000 --> 49:32.000]  determination.
[49:32.000 --> 49:38.000]  No, he filed it on the 11th and on the 22nd the original judge
[49:38.000 --> 49:40.000]  signed it off as a magistrate.
[49:40.000 --> 49:44.000]  Now I've got three judicial conduct complaints and I've got filed
[49:44.000 --> 49:49.000]  with the district attorney criminal charges for the excessive
[49:49.000 --> 49:52.000]  fines.
[49:52.000 --> 49:54.000]  And that was already in the works.
[49:54.000 --> 49:59.000]  I already had the attorney general filing for a mandamus because
[49:59.000 --> 50:01.000]  the police department wouldn't release information underneath
[50:01.000 --> 50:05.000]  552, underneath the information request.
[50:05.000 --> 50:10.000]  Then what they've done is they've issued a new citation, but I've
[50:10.000 --> 50:12.000]  never received a citation, I've never made a promise to appear
[50:12.000 --> 50:14.000]  underneath that citation.
[50:14.000 --> 50:19.000]  And they've had the complaint redone to issue for no driver's license
[50:19.000 --> 50:26.000]  by the same lieutenant of the police department on March 16th.
[50:26.000 --> 50:30.000]  And it's almost word for word as to one on December 13th other than
[50:30.000 --> 50:32.000]  instead of invalid it says no driver's license.
[50:32.000 --> 50:37.000]  And I'm supposed to go before, oh, also, it is also interesting that
[50:37.000 --> 50:42.000]  on the 22nd of February this magistrate who I have the judicial
[50:42.000 --> 50:48.000]  conducts against issued a warrant for my arrest for this.
[50:48.000 --> 50:50.000]  Signed here underneath the curve of the police department.
[50:50.000 --> 50:54.000]  I sent you copies of all this to your email.
[50:54.000 --> 51:02.000]  So what exactly, I mean, it goes off into so many different directions.
[51:02.000 --> 51:05.000]  Okay, as far as the dismissing of the original complaint and filing
[51:05.000 --> 51:07.000]  of a new one, there's no problem there.
[51:07.000 --> 51:11.000]  They're free to do that all the way up until the day of trial as long
[51:11.000 --> 51:15.000]  as they give you notice of anything they do no later than one day prior
[51:15.000 --> 51:18.000]  to trial, okay?
[51:18.000 --> 51:23.000]  The only thing they can do at trial is amend the complaint, but they
[51:23.000 --> 51:26.000]  can't replace the complaint.
[51:26.000 --> 51:29.000]  Now, and the reason for that is very simple.
[51:29.000 --> 51:33.000]  In order for them to replace the complaint, they would have to
[51:33.000 --> 51:35.000]  dismiss the case.
[51:35.000 --> 51:41.000]  But the problem they have there if they dismiss it at that stage is that
[51:41.000 --> 51:43.000]  jeopardy has attached.
[51:43.000 --> 51:45.000]  There's a jury panel waiting to be seated.
[51:45.000 --> 51:48.000]  Jeopardy has been invoked.
[51:48.000 --> 51:54.000]  So if they dismiss rather than amend, they're hosed because all you have
[51:54.000 --> 51:58.000]  to do then is make a claim of double jeopardy.
[51:58.000 --> 52:00.000]  Now, that's what I was thinking, but I was coming...
[52:00.000 --> 52:01.000]  No, wait a minute.
[52:01.000 --> 52:05.000]  You have not gone to trial, have you?
[52:05.000 --> 52:09.000]  No, they had an ex parte trial on the 4th.
[52:09.000 --> 52:12.000]  What do you mean an ex parte trial?
[52:12.000 --> 52:15.000]  When they dismissed it, the original court date was on the 4th.
[52:15.000 --> 52:17.000]  The original judge...
[52:17.000 --> 52:22.000]  They don't have a trial to do a dismissal.
[52:22.000 --> 52:26.000]  A dismissal is not done by trial.
[52:26.000 --> 52:29.000]  It says on the 4th, and that's when the original court date...
[52:29.000 --> 52:32.000]  They say what on the 4th?
[52:32.000 --> 52:34.000]  That the state moves to dismiss.
[52:34.000 --> 52:35.000]  Okay.
[52:35.000 --> 52:39.000]  That doesn't mean at trial upon judgment the state moves to dismiss.
[52:39.000 --> 52:43.000]  No, it's not a trial.
[52:43.000 --> 52:45.000]  So this was a motions hearing.
[52:45.000 --> 52:52.000]  Yeah.
[52:52.000 --> 52:54.000]  Okay.
[52:54.000 --> 53:00.000]  So now they dismissed, so that canceled out the reset for the 23rd then.
[53:00.000 --> 53:03.000]  I don't know whether it canceled out or what it didn't.
[53:03.000 --> 53:06.000]  If they gave you notice of that after they had done that,
[53:06.000 --> 53:08.000]  then I can't say what it did.
[53:08.000 --> 53:14.000]  Well, because this new one is for April 12th.
[53:14.000 --> 53:18.000]  If the original notice was for the old cause number, then yes,
[53:18.000 --> 53:22.000]  that notice would no longer be valid because it went to a case
[53:22.000 --> 53:24.000]  that no longer exists.
[53:24.000 --> 53:30.000]  Okay.
[53:30.000 --> 53:32.000]  So then what they've done is they've changed the complaint,
[53:32.000 --> 53:33.000]  changed the...
[53:33.000 --> 53:38.000]  Well, I still don't understand how you got another citation number.
[53:38.000 --> 53:42.000]  Probably because he rewrote the citation.
[53:42.000 --> 53:45.000]  Well, then shouldn't I get a copy of the citation?
[53:45.000 --> 53:49.000]  Show me where it says you're required to get one if they do it after the fact.
[53:49.000 --> 53:54.000]  He's only required to give you a copy at the time of the stop.
[53:54.000 --> 53:56.000]  That's all the statute says.
[53:56.000 --> 54:00.000]  It doesn't say anything about sending you a copy if you write one after the fact.
[54:00.000 --> 54:01.000]  Okay.
[54:01.000 --> 54:09.000]  So then I should file on this judge to disqualify him since there's...
[54:09.000 --> 54:11.000]  Why?
[54:11.000 --> 54:13.000]  Because I've got a criminal complaint on him
[54:13.000 --> 54:17.000]  and I've got three judicial conduct complaints on him,
[54:17.000 --> 54:20.000]  two of which are still underneath the investigation.
[54:20.000 --> 54:22.000]  Based on?
[54:22.000 --> 54:27.000]  A crime of charging more than what was allowed by law, the $566.
[54:27.000 --> 54:28.000]  Okay.
[54:28.000 --> 54:29.000]  So this is the original judge?
[54:29.000 --> 54:30.000]  Yes.
[54:30.000 --> 54:31.000]  Okay.
[54:31.000 --> 54:35.000]  Well, the fact that the original judge issued a warrant is a basis
[54:35.000 --> 54:37.000]  for having that warrant quashed.
[54:37.000 --> 54:45.000]  The original judge cannot act in any way in a case where he has been disqualified
[54:45.000 --> 54:48.000]  or has recused themselves.
[54:48.000 --> 54:55.000]  They cannot act in any capacity in that case.
[54:55.000 --> 54:56.000]  Yeah, because that's what he says here.
[54:56.000 --> 55:01.000]  He says to bring him before me, and that's as the magistrate.
[55:01.000 --> 55:04.000]  Then you need to file a judicial conduct complaint against him for the issuance
[55:04.000 --> 55:09.000]  of that warrant and you need to label the reason for the complaint as retaliation.
[55:09.000 --> 55:10.000]  Yeah, I've already did that.
[55:10.000 --> 55:11.000]  That's already in the mail.
[55:11.000 --> 55:15.000]  And you need to send a copy of that to the AG as well.
[55:15.000 --> 55:16.000]  Okay.
[55:16.000 --> 55:18.000]  Now, I didn't do that, but I will.
[55:18.000 --> 55:26.000]  Now, the notice of the court date is for the original judge.
[55:26.000 --> 55:28.000]  So he was the magistrate for the probable cause,
[55:28.000 --> 55:33.000]  and he's going to be the judge at the arraignment.
[55:33.000 --> 55:42.000]  He cannot be the judge at any time in any way whatsoever for any purpose in this case.
[55:42.000 --> 55:44.000]  Right, now that's what I was thinking.
[55:44.000 --> 55:47.000]  Now, here, however, is where you're going to have an issue.
[55:47.000 --> 55:49.000]  Okay.
[55:49.000 --> 55:55.000]  The original cause number is where you disqualified him, right?
[55:55.000 --> 55:56.000]  Right.
[55:56.000 --> 55:59.000]  Not the new one, right?
[55:59.000 --> 56:00.000]  Not only the new one.
[56:00.000 --> 56:07.000]  Okay, then you need to refile your motion to disqualify for prejudice, bias,
[56:07.000 --> 56:12.000]  and retaliation to get him off of the new case,
[56:12.000 --> 56:22.000]  because he has no business being on a refiled version of the original case either.
[56:22.000 --> 56:23.000]  Okay, I can do that.
[56:23.000 --> 56:24.000]  All right.
[56:24.000 --> 56:25.000]  Okay.
[56:25.000 --> 56:26.000]  I'll go ahead and do that.
[56:26.000 --> 56:30.000]  Yeah, because I thought I had like several different issues going on, but no,
[56:30.000 --> 56:32.000]  that cut it down to pretty simple.
[56:32.000 --> 56:33.000]  All right.
[56:33.000 --> 56:34.000]  I appreciate it, Eddie.
[56:34.000 --> 56:35.000]  All right.
[56:35.000 --> 56:36.000]  No problem.
[56:36.000 --> 56:37.000]  Bye.
[56:37.000 --> 56:38.000]  Bye-bye.
[56:38.000 --> 56:39.000]  All right.
[56:39.000 --> 56:41.000]  Now we're going to Kev in Michigan.
[56:41.000 --> 56:44.000]  Kev, what do you got?
[56:44.000 --> 56:47.000]  Oh, go on, Eddie.
[56:47.000 --> 56:52.000]  I got something similar to the last guy.
[56:52.000 --> 56:56.000]  Okay, Kev, I need you to wake up and speak a little clearer in the phone, man.
[56:56.000 --> 56:59.000]  You sound like you're talking half asleep from the bottom of a well.
[56:59.000 --> 57:00.000]  You hear me?
[57:00.000 --> 57:01.000]  I can hear you.
[57:01.000 --> 57:03.000]  Just speak up a little bit.
[57:03.000 --> 57:05.000]  Okay.
[57:05.000 --> 57:11.000]  I had something similar to the last guy, a judge that I disqualified.
[57:11.000 --> 57:19.000]  I sent disqualification letters to the court and a judicial conduct complaint,
[57:19.000 --> 57:28.000]  and he basically ruled on his own disqualification, and I disqualified him because...
[57:28.000 --> 57:31.000]  Okay, what's the rules on disqualification in Maryland?
[57:31.000 --> 57:36.000]  Here in Texas, a judge cannot rule on his own disqualification, only his own recusal,
[57:36.000 --> 57:40.000]  because a recusal is always self-made.
[57:40.000 --> 57:42.000]  Michigan, Michigan.
[57:42.000 --> 57:46.000]  Right, I know, but I'm saying here in Texas, that's the way the rules operate.
[57:46.000 --> 57:52.000]  Here, he can rule on a recusal request because a recusal is self-made.
[57:52.000 --> 57:57.000]  A disqualification, however, he cannot rule on his own disqualification here in Texas.
[57:57.000 --> 57:59.000]  What are the rules in Michigan?
[57:59.000 --> 58:02.000]  He can't rule on his own either here in Michigan either.
[58:02.000 --> 58:07.000]  Okay, then what you need to do now is file a judicial conduct complaint against that judge
[58:07.000 --> 58:13.000]  and a second motion to disqualify based upon his violation of law
[58:13.000 --> 58:19.000]  and abuse of discretion and judicial authority in the first disqualification.
[58:19.000 --> 58:22.000]  Okay, okay.
[58:22.000 --> 58:31.000]  And also, when I went to trial with this judge, I also missed the appeal process.
[58:31.000 --> 58:32.000]  Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[58:32.000 --> 58:34.000]  You went to trial with this judge.
[58:34.000 --> 58:36.000]  Hang on to that thought and we'll pick it up on the other side.
[58:36.000 --> 58:38.000]  All right, folks, we're about to take a break.
[58:38.000 --> 58:43.000]  512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[58:43.000 --> 58:50.000]  Give us a call, get in line, and we will be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:54.000 --> 58:58.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:02.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:02.000 --> 59:07.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.000 --> 59:25.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word
[59:25.000 --> 59:28.000]  beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:43.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.000 --> 59:47.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.000 --> 59:50.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:07.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown,
[01:00:07.000 --> 01:00:10.000]  a market for Monday, the 20th of March, 2017,
[01:00:10.000 --> 01:00:14.000]  open trading with gold at $1,234.70 an ounce,
[01:00:14.000 --> 01:00:16.000]  silver at $17.44 an ounce,
[01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:19.000]  Texas crude at $48.78 a barrel,
[01:00:19.000 --> 01:00:23.000]  and bitcoin is down over the weekend but still over 1,000,
[01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:27.000]  currently sitting in 1,036 U.S. currency.
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:33.000]  Today in history, the year 2003, the invasion of Iraq kicks off in the early hours of the morning.
[01:00:33.000 --> 01:00:38.000]  The United States along with the United Kingdom, Australia, and Poland begin military operations in Iraq
[01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:42.000]  leading to the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and the eventual rise of ISIS.
[01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:47.000]  The independent U.K.-U.S. group the Iraq Body Count Project, IBC,
[01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  estimates that a total of 154,000 to 172,000 civilian deaths have resulted
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  from the March 2003 invasion up till February 2016,
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  with roughly 5,000 U.S. soldiers dying in the same timeframe.
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  It is estimated that over $2 trillion U.S. taxpayer dollars have been spent thus far,
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  with the number potentially reaching over $6 trillion in the next decade due to health care for disabled veterans.
[01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  In recent news, German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement Sunday
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:20.000]  that there is no debt account at NATO.
[01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  This came a day after Trump tweeted that quote,
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  Germany owes vast sums of money to NATO,
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  and the United States must be paid more for the powerful and very expensive defense it provides to Germany.
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  Trump had his meeting with German Chancellor Merkel in Washington on Friday of last week
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:39.000]  where the mainstream media went in frenzy as it appeared that Trump refused to give the Chancellor a handshake
[01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  in the Oval Office for the cameras.
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:45.000]  Trump did call NATO obsolete and threatened to moderate its commitment to it
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  if partners failed to meet the mandated military spending requirement of 2 percent GDP
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:52.000]  during this campaign for president,
[01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:56.000]  a target the German government has committed to reaching by 2024.
[01:01:56.000 --> 01:02:01.000]  The combined wealth of the non-U.S. allies measured in GDP exceeds that of the United States.
[01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  However, non-U.S. allies together spend less than half of what the United States spends on the military.
[01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:15.000]  Members of the Chamani tribe that live in the Amazon jungle in Bolivia have the healthiest hearts in the world
[01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:18.000]  according to a study involving more than 700 of these primitive people.
[01:02:18.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  Researchers published a study in the journal The Lancet
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:25.000]  and have found that nearly 9 out of 10 Chamani people have clear arteries.
[01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  To put that into comparison, an 80-year-old Chamani has a heart akin to that of an American in their mid-50s.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  Who would have thought that lower fat intake, little to no sugar,
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  an active lifestyle outdoors with fresh air and sunlight,
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  and no processed food could be good for your heart?
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:46.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently for sponsors.
[01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  If you have a product or a service you'd like to advertise with us,
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:54.000]  feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257.
[01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:13.000]  This was Rick Roady with your Lowdown for March 20th, 2017.
[01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:39.000]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:42.000]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig,
[01:03:42.000 --> 01:03:44.000]  and we are talking to Kev in Michigan.
[01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:51.000]  Now Kev, before I went to break, you said you went to trial with this judge that you disqualified.
[01:03:51.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  How is that possible?
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  No, no, no. It was afterwards that I sent the disqualification.
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:01.000]  What do you mean afterwards?
[01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  Because...
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  You can't disqualify a judge after the trial. That's not possible.
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  Okay, because I was headed towards appeal.
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:17.000]  Well the appeal, that's just the point.
[01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  Once you have had trial, it's too late to disqualify the judge sitting at trial.
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:31.000]  Now you can argue the judge abused discretion, the judge abused the rules of evidence, the rules of procedure.
[01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  You can say that these are appealable errors that may get your case overturned,
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:39.000]  but you can't disqualify him after the fact.
[01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:48.000]  Okay, the reason why I disqualified him is because he put a warrant out for my arrest for not paying the fine.
[01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  Well, again, that's a whole different issue.
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  Are these non-jailable offenses in Michigan?
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:57.000]  No, they're civil.
[01:04:57.000 --> 01:04:59.000]  Okay, they're civil?
[01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  Mm-hmm.
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  Oh, well that's good.
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:11.000]  But see, here's the problem. Even if the fine is civil, did he issue the warrant for failure to pay the fine,
[01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:15.000]  or did he issue the warrant for contempt?
[01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:19.000]  Comply with court order.
[01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  Right, contempt.
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  Yeah.
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:25.000]  Okay, so that's where the arrest warrant came from.
[01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:34.000]  Now the question is, under the Michigan rules, is can they criminalize failure to comply with a court order in a civil matter?
[01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:38.000]  That's what you need to find out.
[01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:41.000]  Okay, okay.
[01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  Because there may be cases where they can and there may be cases where they cannot.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:48.000]  Okay.
[01:05:48.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  But either way, that's an abuse of power. That's not something you can disqualify him over.
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:06:03.000]  It's something you can judicially conduct, complain him over, and if he actually caused you harm that he had no lawful authority to cause you,
[01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:10.000]  you can even sue him for it because he's not acting judicially when he acts outside of lawful authority.
[01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:12.000]  But you can't disqualify him.
[01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:24.000]  Okay, so what about the fact that I can't really, I'm thinking about suing him because of the warrant, but I'm not sure if I have any.
[01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  Did you get arrested on the warrant?
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:27.000]  No.
[01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  Okay, then the harm didn't attach.
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:32.000]  No.
[01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  Did he recall the warrant, or has the warrant been nullified in any other way?
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:38.000]  No.
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  So the warrant's outstanding.
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  Yep.
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:47.000]  So if you allow yourself to be arrested on the warrant, what happens? Harm attaches, right?
[01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  Yep.
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:58.000]  Then you can sue, provided the law does not support the judge's ability to issue that warrant.
[01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:04.000]  Okay. So how else would I get my issue on the record?
[01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:13.000]  Well, the thing is, is there a rule in Michigan that stays collection of a judgment pending appeal?
[01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  But I've missed my appeal window.
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  Well, if you missed your appeal window, then that's why I issued the warrant.
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  So I missed the damn window. So I'm thinking that maybe, because I spoke to, I did go back and forth with Randy about this, Randy Naroni,
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  and he's telling me that I probably should just file in 1983.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:52.000]  If you can show that there was a federally protected right violated at some point during your trial or the rest of the process, absolutely.
[01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:58.000]  But you better be able to show exactly how that harm came to you.
[01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  That means you have to know what that judge was supposed to do and what they didn't do,
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:11.000]  and whether or not they abused their authority or discretion when they did it and have no law backing them up for it.
[01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:16.000]  Otherwise, your 1983 suit's going to get thrown right back in your face.
[01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:24.000]  I did do the seven interrogatories, and the judge said he wasn't going to hear any of that.
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:27.000]  The judge has no business saying whether or not he's going to hear it.
[01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  The interrogatories were meant for the witness, not the judge. Who did you send them to?
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  I sent them to the prosecuting attorney.
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:42.000]  Why did you send them to the prosecuting attorney? They're not the one that's going to get on the stand and testify.
[01:08:42.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  Okay, but I did read out those in the room.
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  Who did you read it to?
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  The witnesses, the witnesses on the stand.
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:55.000]  So you asked the witness those questions on the stand.
[01:08:55.000 --> 01:08:56.000]  Yep, yep.
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:09:01.000]  And the judge interfered with your ability to cross-examine the witnesses.
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  Yep.
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  Then you may have an abuse of discretion and an abuse of authority.
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  He wouldn't let me bring up the arrest, the arrest that occurred. He wasn't going to hear anything about the arrest.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  He doesn't have a choice if there was no probable cause determination ever made for the arrest. That's another appealable issue.
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:26.000]  Okay. See, like I said, I missed my appeal window, so I'm trying to figure out how...
[01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  Yeah, but see, here's the problem. The court cannot obtain jurisdiction.
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:33.000]  See, here's the thing. Michigan...
[01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:36.000]  Randy posted the statute on Facebook.
[01:09:36.000 --> 01:09:42.000]  They cannot initiate a civil action by means of arrest in Michigan.
[01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:45.000]  The statute is very clear on that.
[01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  That means that court never had proper jurisdiction of anything,
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  which means every single thing the judge did was absolutely without force and effect of law and illegal.
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  Okay. Yeah, I knew it was illegal.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  So there's no appeal to be had.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  There's an abuse of power and an abuse of judicial authority and an abuse of discretion to be had.
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  And that would be grounds for a federal lawsuit.
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  Okay. So I was supposed to send the seven interrogatories to the police station.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  Yes. Doesn't the wording of the interrogatories tell you that the witness that gets sued, the officer,
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:32.000]  is the one that's supposed to answer those?
[01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:35.000]  Yeah, I was thinking that the prosecutor was supposed to have...
[01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:38.000]  The prosecutor will probably advise the witness how to answer in this case,
[01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  but it's not the prosecutor's job to answer them. It is the witness's job.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  So I sent them to the wrong place. I didn't send them to the police officers.
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:54.000]  So I should have sent them to the police officers.
[01:10:54.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  But wouldn't it still have some kind of force and effect, even though I sent them to the prosecutor?
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:04.000]  No. Why? He's not the cop's attorney.
[01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:08.000]  How would it have any force and effect going to the prosecutor or the judge?
[01:11:08.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  Neither of them have an obligation to answer that.
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  Okay. Okay. So, okay.
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:20.000]  The officer is the one who initiated the warrantless arrest, correct?
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:21.000]  Yep.
[01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:27.000]  He's the one required to know on what legal authority and lawful authority he does so. Is he not?
[01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:28.000]  Yep.
[01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  Which means he is required to know the specific information that is in those seven interrogatories.
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:43.000]  Is he not? Because he can't do those things if he doesn't know the information that's in those interrogatories.
[01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:47.000]  Okay. So next time, I should always send those to the officer.
[01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  You will send them to whoever initiated the warrantless arrest.
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  Okay.
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  Especially if it's for a civil matter, because there is no valid arrest authority for a civil matter as far as initiating a cause of action.
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  Okay. So what about the prosecutor in this matter?
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:14.000]  Does the prosecutor have any kind of responsibility in allowing the judge or...
[01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:18.000]  If you raise the issue properly, the prosecutor...
[01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:25.000]  Here's the other problem. There can't be a prosecutor if this is civil.
[01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:30.000]  There cannot be a prosecutor.
[01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:32.000]  Okay. Okay.
[01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:39.000]  There can only be opposing counsel on the other side, but there cannot be a prosecutor because there's nothing to prosecute.
[01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:44.000]  They're the plaintiff, not the prosecution.
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  Okay.
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  Because by definition, this is a civil matter. It is a civil suit.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:59.000]  Where is the breach of contract that would give them standing to come after you in a civil manner?
[01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:06.000]  So would I bring it up in the 1983 as lack of jurisdiction?
[01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:14.000]  Absolutely. You were maliciously prosecuted through corrupt practices by this court and this attorney colluding together.
[01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:17.000]  Now, please tell me this was a municipal court.
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  This is a city court.
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  Okay. And that this was a city attorney.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  Yeah.
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  Does Michigan Constitution authorize municipal attorneys to act as prosecutors in the name of the state?
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  Or does it give that power only to county and district attorneys?
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  I'll find that out.
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:44.000]  You better, because if that's the case, that city attorney has no rock to hide under.
[01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:54.000]  He has no prosecutorial immunity whatsoever because he can never be a valid prosecutor with that protection.
[01:13:54.000 --> 01:14:00.000]  Okay. So you said can city attorneys prosecute?
[01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  No. I said does your state constitution authorize municipal attorneys to act as prosecutors in the name of the state?
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:19.000]  The power to prosecute in the name of the state specifically granted by constitution only to county and district attorneys in Michigan.
[01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  Here in Texas, only county and district attorneys can prosecute in the name of the state.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  It is a specifically constitutional delegated power.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  It is not redelegable.
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:38.000]  City attorneys in Texas are not elected. They are appointed by unaccountable individuals.
[01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  That's exactly why that power is vested only in elected officers, because of the public accountability, which city attorneys do not have.
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  But this is me against the city of East Lansing.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  What's your point?
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:57.000]  What's your point?
[01:14:57.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  You're saying that a city has a right to break the law and violate rights just because it's a city in Michigan?
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:12.000]  Okay. So you're saying that the city attorney can't prosecute for the city of-
[01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:23.000]  If your state constitution specifically delegates the power to prosecute in the name of the state only to two elected officials, your county and district attorneys,
[01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:28.000]  where does it name municipal attorneys as being able to wield that power?
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  Is a municipal attorney part of the county attorney's office?
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:36.000]  No.
[01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  No. Are they part of the district attorney's office?
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:40.000]  No.
[01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:49.000]  No. So where in the hell would they ever get that power if the constitution only gave it to these other two guys or offices?
[01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  Okay.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:57.000]  The legislature cannot re-delegate that power from the people it was granted to.
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:02.000]  See, that's a judicial power, not a legislative power.
[01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:11.000]  So the judiciary couldn't delegate it even if they wanted to, if the constitution doesn't authorize them to do so.
[01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:16.000]  And the courts cannot delegate it either.
[01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:21.000]  I got to check that out there. I got to figure out that and see if this is the case.
[01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:32.000]  Because I can- and when you were- if I would bring a suit like this, I would bring it in their private capacity or personal-
[01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  They don't have an official capacity in this, but you're going to do it in their private and official capacities because they did it under color of law from their official capacity.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  You want the pockets of the city put on the hook for what these guys did.
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  Okay. Okay. So it would be against the city also.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  It would be against all of them in their personal and official capacities. Hang on just a second, Kev.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:10.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fix. I'd be lost without logos.
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:13.000]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:22.000]  How can I help logos?
[01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:31.000]  You can order new supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:37.000]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  No.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  No.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  No. I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:57.000]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:17:57.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  We are welcome.
[01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:07.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:12.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:12.000 --> 01:18:18.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:26.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Order now.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:23.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:23.000 --> 01:19:35.000]  As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I take a look at my life and realize there's nothing left, cause I've been blasting and laughing so long that even my momma thinks that my mind is gone.
[01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  But I ain't never crossed a man that didn't deserve it, me be treated like a punk, you know that's unheard of.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:47.000]  You better watch how you're talking, and where you're walking, or you and your homies might be lying and talking.
[01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:53.000]  I really hate to trip, but I gotta lope, as they cook I see myself in the pistol smoke.
[01:19:53.000 --> 01:20:13.000]  I'm the kind of G, the little homies wanna be like on my knees in the night, saying prayers in the streetlight.
[01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:22.000]  Yeah, just like I said at the beginning of the show, people, right now we are living in a gangster's paradise, and the gangsters all have bar cards.
[01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:30.000]  And those that don't, did have, and are wearing the black robe to protect those that still do.
[01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:38.000]  There is no bigger criminal enterprise in existence today than the bar associations.
[01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  There are none, the mafia cannot steal as much money as these arrogant individuals in these associations.
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  The bar needs to end, attorneys occupying public office needs to end.
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:07.000]  We would not be in the mess we're in today if it were not for these people being where they are, guaranteed.
[01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  All right, that being said, let's get back to Kev in Michigan here real quick.
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  All right, Kev, what were you asking?
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  So would this be a civil complaint or criminal complaint that I would file if this thing rolled in?
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:30.000]  You can't, you can file criminal charges in the state and at the DOJ against the judge and the city attorney.
[01:21:30.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  But what you're gonna file in the federal court is a civil lawsuit against them.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:38.000]  That's what a 1983 is.
[01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  Okay.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:49.000]  And just like how hard would this be for a convict, Eddie?
[01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:51.000]  Well, I can't answer that question.
[01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:55.000]  That all depends upon the capabilities and fortitude of the convict.
[01:21:55.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  Okay.
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  So it's no limits like to say, oh, well.
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  Well, there may be some things you cannot do if you're currently incarcerated.
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:06.000]  No, no, no.
[01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  But if that's not the case, the prior shouldn't have anything to do with getting justice in a completely unrelated matter.
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  Okay, okay.
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  That's all I need to know right there.
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:21.000]  That's all I need to know.
[01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:23.000]  All right, Eddie.
[01:22:23.000 --> 01:22:29.000]  Yeah, I was just trying to get this thing back up into the light because I think that this judge is trying to hide.
[01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:35.000]  Well, the first thing you've got to figure out is the proper way to shine that light.
[01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  Okay.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  So I finally should just file a criminal against the city attorney and the judge.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  You can file criminal complaints at the local and federal level with the DOJ, Office of Access to Courts.
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  Yes.
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:50.000]  Okay.
[01:22:50.000 --> 01:22:51.000]  Okay.
[01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  And then you can also turn around and file a civil suit at the federal and state level if you can find a state court that will take it.
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:02.000]  You can sue him at both levels.
[01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  Okay.
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  It's not like I would have to wait until the state turns me down and then go to the feds.
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  I can go straight to the feds.
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  What do you mean turns you down?
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  No, you can prosecute both the state and federal cases at the same time if you can afford the time and effort to do it.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  Okay.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:26.000]  Because I actually got this other law school I'm going through right now with this other issue, and it's in appeal right now.
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:33.000]  I think it looks pretty good, but I'm thinking I probably should be suing at the same time as the appeal is going on.
[01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  I'm not sure if that's a plausible strategy.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  I don't know if you ever heard of anything like that before, Eddie.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:47.000]  Well, the thing about it is you can carry on both lawsuits simultaneously.
[01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:52.000]  You're liable to run out of statute of limitations on one if you're waiting on the end of the other.
[01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:59.000]  Because the statute of limitations to file is going to run simultaneously, not concurrent.
[01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  Okay.
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:01.000]  All right.
[01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  All right, Eddie.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  I sure appreciate your help, man.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:05.000]  Okay.
[01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:06.000]  God, we bless you.
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:07.000]  All right.
[01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:08.000]  Yep.
[01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  Thanks for calling in, man.
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:11.000]  All right.
[01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  Now, that being said, I have Rick in Texas, a special caller that had some information that he wanted to share with us about a recent incident that he is going through.
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  What can we do for you?
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:23.000]  Hey, Eddie.
[01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:24.000]  Howdy.
[01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  Am I there?
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:26.000]  You are there.
[01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:29.000]  I'm not on the radio, but anyway.
[01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  Anyhow, here's the wonderful thing.
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:35.000]  Anyhow, love talking to you.
[01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  Love talking to you.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:38.000]  Here's where we're at.
[01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  My wife was arrested on February the 15th.
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:47.000]  She showed up in court.
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  She was doing a knee seat and-
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  Wait, she was doing a what?
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  She was trying to revoke a knee seat, N-I-S-I.
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:24:56.000]  Okay.
[01:24:56.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  They were trying to revoke her bond.
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:06.000]  Back in April 14th, she was supposed to be in court.
[01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  The court records actually, and we actually have the papers, and another judge gave me the copies, that she was supposed to be in court on the 20th, not the 13th.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  So on the 13th of April of 2016, she did not show up.
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:30.000]  On the 20th, she did show up.
[01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  They had court going on at the time.
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  We were kind of amused and were like, okay.
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:39.000]  Nobody told us anything different.
[01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  Nobody gave us a reset date.
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  She was arrested on May the 28th when we were leaving the concert.
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:53.000]  Just say that.
[01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  Okay.
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  Okay.
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:25:59.000]  We were leaving the concert, and she got arrested.
[01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:00.000]  I got arrested.
[01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  And she was transported back to Polk County, which is about two hours away from us.
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  And I brought to the attention to a magistrate, not the judge, but the magistrate.
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  I brought him the paperwork showing that we had the 20th set, and he saw it, and EPR bonded out.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:32.000]  So after EPR bonded her out, she got another attorney, yada, yada, yada.
[01:26:32.000 --> 01:26:39.000]  So anyway, we went through two attorneys since then.
[01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  And anyhow, let's just say I got incarcerated back in December for failure to identify and resisting arrest in Harris County.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  I had a $100,000 bond, and I'm not kidding you.
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  I had a $100,000 bond, and I could not be there for my wife.
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  And she was supposed to be in trial on the 6th, but I have in front of me as I speak,
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  which is a second motion for continuance from her attorney for the 6th.
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:25.000]  In other words, that she's not supposed to be there on the 6th.
[01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  And he sent her a nice little letter, and I've got the court documents, but it was never signed by the judge.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:46.000]  So she showed up on the 15th to deal with the bond issue of them stealing our $15,000 for the failure to appear on the 13th of April.
[01:27:46.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  And anyhow, so she showed up on that and thought that she was told,
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  and I have papers saying that she was supposed to be there on the 17th again, but that 17th was also on the NACDIS deal.
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  So she shows up on the 15th.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:09.000]  Why, I'm incarcerated.
[01:28:09.000 --> 01:28:11.000]  I didn't get released.
[01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  By the way, my charges for all dropped, by the way.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:22.000]  Anyhow, so she shows up on the 15th and was arrest walking out of the courtroom.
[01:28:22.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  She has since been incarcerated since then.
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:28.000]  And I've bought everything I can.
[01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:38.000]  I've thrown everything I can at the wall, and I'm dealing with a corrupt court is what I'm dealing with here.
[01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  She was not trying to evade arrest.
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:44.000]  She wasn't trying to do any of that kind of stuff.
[01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  She was arrested walking out of the courtroom and didn't have my expertise to keep her out of trouble, so to speak.
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  Are you catching up with any other things I'm saying?
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  Oh, yeah.
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  Okay.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  So anyway, instead of them going with Article CCP 2213 and CCP Article 2216, Feddard to appear was not willful.
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:23.000]  She did not fail to appear because it was willful.
[01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:27.000]  And then on the 6th, when she didn't show up, it wasn't willful.
[01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  She got a letter from her attorney.
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  She got a letter from the court stating that they were going to postpone it, but it was never signed by the judge.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  Now, my wife, they're trying to steal our $15,000 bond right now.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  Okay, Rick.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  Hang on just a second.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  I've got to take a break.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  We'll pick this up on the other side, okay?
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  All right, folks.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  Y'all hang in there.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  We'll be right back after this break.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  In Africa, there's a tiny rat that would make a tasty snack for jackals and wild cats, but they won't touch him with a 10-foot pole.
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and after the break, I'll tell you what his secret weapon is.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:41.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  In northeastern Africa, tiny creatures called crested rats can walk safely among the most voracious predators.
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  They're slow and easy to catch, and apparently very appetizing.
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:30:57.000]  So how do they survive?
[01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  With one of the most ingenious defenses in the animal kingdom, they chew the roots and bark of a toxic plant called the acocanthura tree,
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  then rub the saliva on a row of quills down their backs.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:11.000]  When an enemy approaches, they expose their flanks invitingly.
[01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:17.000]  Predators either smell the poison in bolts or take a bite and soon fall dead from heart failure.
[01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  The toxin you see comes from the poison arrow tree, the same one hunters once used to kill elephants.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:03.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:09.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails,
[01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:17.000]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements
[01:32:17.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:26.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:32.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:33.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:57.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking to Rick in Texas.
[01:33:57.000 --> 01:33:59.000]  Rick, go ahead.
[01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:05.000]  All right, so anyway, I can make this real quick.
[01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:10.000]  Let me go back to where I got arrested, and let's go from there.
[01:34:10.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  I got arrested.
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:16.000]  I don't have any plates on my automobiles.
[01:34:16.000 --> 01:34:20.000]  I've got, don't tread on me, license plates.
[01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:23.000]  Okay, well, not license plates, but plates.
[01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:27.000]  And I've been doing it since 2002.
[01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  And I got hit by somebody driving out of a parking lot.
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  And when the police showed up, I told my wife we were close enough to walk home.
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  I told my wife to walk home before the police arrived.
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  She was a little intoxicated at the time.
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:35:00.000]  So I handled it, and that's when I ended up spending December all the way to February in jail just to win my case.
[01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  How did they hold you in jail for that long?
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:17.000]  Well, all the things I put forth in Harris County, all the rich, everything I threw at them, they threw back at me.
[01:35:17.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  They wouldn't accept them.
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  And I know what they were doing was totally unlawful.
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  Illegal and unlawful are two different words.
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:32.000]  You and I both know that.
[01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:40.000]  I stood it out, and on January 31, I was supposed to be released.
[01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:45.000]  I was supposed to be in court that day, and they denied going to court.
[01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  They just dropped the charges after holding me there since December the 12th.
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  So I missed Christmas.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  Well, we're not going to get into all that.
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  So anyway, I'm supposed to be released on the 31st of January.
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:16.000]  Well, the judge in court nine did not release the paperwork stating that I was released from the charges.
[01:36:16.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  And I knew they had a 10-day hold on me for Montgomery County for the same charges.
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:28.000]  Failure to identify and resisting arrest.
[01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:36.000]  So I put in all these things that I could do to try to get the time served or whatever while I was in Harris County
[01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  because I was in a hurry to get home to my wife because I knew she had to be in court on the 6th.
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  Well, that totally went past.
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  But she called me up, or actually I called her up, and she says, no, I got a continuance.
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  It's not until the 16th, but I got to be there on the 15th for this nisi where they're trying to steal your $15,000, Rick.
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  And I said, okay, baby, I should be out of there by then.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:14.000]  Well, I wasn't out of there until the 23rd out of Montgomery County.
[01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:19.000]  My wife got arrested on the 15th when she showed up in Polk County.
[01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:23.000]  She went there and was arguing the nisi.
[01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  And what she didn't understand, I couldn't tell her, she had to argue it in paper.
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:34.000]  She couldn't argue it with her mouth.
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:38.000]  And what she did, she showed up there and tried to argue it with her mouth.
[01:37:38.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  And consequently, they're stealing our $15,000 cash bond for her.
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  And as soon as she walked out of the courtroom, she was arrested.
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  Now, I've already done a habeas corpus, which I hand delivered to all the players.
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  I hand delivered it to the sheriff.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:03.000]  I hand delivered it to the DA.
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  I hand delivered it to the judge.
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  I hand delivered it to the prosecutor.
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:14.000]  I hand delivered it to basically all the players.
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  And they're totally ignoring my habeas corpus, and they're not releasing my wife.
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  And my wife is, I'll say this in a light way, my wife is a little on the fragile side, okay?
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  She's not a big woman.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:37.000]  She's a itty bitty woman, and she's scared to death.
[01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:39.000]  She's in jail.
[01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  I've had three meetings with the sheriff trying to get him to release her.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  And with the habeas corpus, this judge is so scared of the prosecutor that he's not going to sign the habeas corpus.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:00.000]  He doesn't have a choice.
[01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  Judges are not given discretion in Texas to ignore habeas proceedings.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  They have a mandate under the law.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:16.000]  So file a federal habeas, get it out of the state and file a federal habeas,
[01:39:16.000 --> 01:39:20.000]  citing no administrative relief available at the state level.
[01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:23.000]  The judge will not do their duty under the law.
[01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  So file a criminal complaint with the DOJ on that judge and file for a federal habeas.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:37.000]  Okay, where I was going next, and I, okay, correct me if I'm wrong.
[01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  What I'm doing next is I'm going with a RICO.
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:42.000]  With a what?
[01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  And filing a RICO.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  A RICO may get you a civil suit to go after them on, a civil RICO, but it isn't going to help get your wife out of jail.
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  No, no, I was going with a criminal RICO.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:40:01.000]  Well, RICO, well, the thing is you can't make a criminal RICO.
[01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  Only the feds can make a criminal RICO or the state.
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  You can make other criminal allegations, but you cannot make that one.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  Okay, I can't come at them with a criminal RICO.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  No, you can do a civil RICO suit.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  Okay.
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  You cannot do a criminal RICO.
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:28.000]  Okay, I'm listening.
[01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  Don't hesitate.
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  So what I would suggest you do first and foremost is file a federal habeas and a federal criminal complaint against this judge.
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  Okay.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:46.000]  And make sure that you cite violations of Title 18 as the basis for your criminal complaint.
[01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  Oh, absolutely, absolutely.
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:56.000]  But now don't forget to add that not only is the judge acting in violation of federal law,
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:41:04.000]  but he is using his authority to violate state law and state constitution all at the same time.
[01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:05.000]  Absolutely.
[01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  And denying you access to the courts by refusing to respond to the habeas, as he is mandated to do.
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  God bless.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:23.000]  So now you've got one for the DOJ for the official misconduct and abuse of official capacity division,
[01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  and then you've got one for violation of access to the courts division.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:32.000]  And the sheriff, you know, he wants to let her go.
[01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  He wants to let her go.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:42.000]  I've had conversations with him many, many times over, and he's like, the old judge has to do his signing.
[01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:46.000]  He said, no, you are the main character.
[01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:48.000]  No, actually, he's not.
[01:41:48.000 --> 01:41:51.000]  The only way he can put them in jail is a commitment order,
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:56.000]  and the only way he can let them out is a legal basis for doing so.
[01:41:56.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  If he's got a direct order from a court to hold that individual,
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:06.000]  then he has to do so if there is no other law that would supersede that court order.
[01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:11.000]  So if you haven't given him anything he can use or he hasn't come up with anything he can use,
[01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  he can't comply without endangering himself in the process.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:17.000]  Okay.
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:18.000]  Okay.
[01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  I'm aware of what you're saying.
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:22.000]  I'm aware of what you're saying.
[01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:27.000]  And I appreciate that because, you know, I've been listening to you for a long time,
[01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:30.000]  and, you know, I consider you a friend.
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:32.000]  I'll put it to you that way.
[01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:33.000]  Well, I appreciate that.
[01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:34.000]  Consider you a friend.
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:36.000]  And I try not to blow smoke up anybody's skirt.
[01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:39.000]  I try to tell it the way I understand it and know what to be.
[01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:43.000]  You know, Alex is a friend of mine as well.
[01:42:43.000 --> 01:42:46.000]  And I actually was looking for a little...
[01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:51.000]  because what's going on here in this small town of Polk County?
[01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:53.000]  You know, I'm in Harris County.
[01:42:53.000 --> 01:43:01.000]  I'm in a small town, Spring, but, you know, this all happened up 2014.
[01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  I mean, come on.
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:04.000]  Well, the thing is it doesn't matter.
[01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:09.000]  Those two counties, you are still within the cesspool ring that is Houston.
[01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:10.000]  Oh, yeah.
[01:43:10.000 --> 01:43:11.000]  You betcha.
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  And so the corrupt influence spreads from there.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  It's actually worse in Polk County.
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  I've never seen anything like that in my life.
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  I sit in there and, you know, I play...
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:27.000]  Well, welcome again to what I was originally saying on the show.
[01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  The attorneys are the ones that made that possible,
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  and they're the ones that will keep it in play as long as they maintain power.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  Hey, what you were saying on that...
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  I had that other thing that you put together,
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  and talking about going back to common law.
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  Give me a second. I got...
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  Okay, well, hang on just a second.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:51.000]  I got another break to come up with here,
[01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  and then I'm going to have to get rid of you on the other side real quick
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:43:55.000]  because I got another caller.
[01:43:55.000 --> 01:43:57.000]  But hang on, and I'll be right back, okay?
[01:43:57.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:15.000]  and now you can win, too.
[01:44:15.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:21.000]  using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:44:21.000 --> 01:44:24.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons,
[01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:33.000]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:38.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.000 --> 01:44:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:41.000 --> 01:44:44.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:44:44.000 --> 01:44:49.000]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.000 --> 01:44:57.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:44:57.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:01.000 --> 01:46:28.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:28.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio. I'm going to see if I can wrap this up with Rick.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  All right, Rick, I'd love to give you more time, and I hate to cut you off like this,
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:39.000]  but I've got three other callers still up here on the board,
[01:46:39.000 --> 01:46:42.000]  and I've only got this last segment to try to get them in.
[01:46:42.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  So I understand your situation.
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:48.000]  I understand where you are with it and the places that you're located.
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  Believe me, I do, been there, done that, had this fight before.
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  I used to work at Pennzoil Quaker State in downtown Houston,
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:47:00.000]  and I gave the cops down there to live in hell every time I was downtown.
[01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  So I know. Trust me. But right now, take it up.
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:05.000]  I've got one thing to throw back.
[01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:06.000]  Okay.
[01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  I've got one thing to throw back at you.
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:13.000]  Hey, what do we do about these things that are not codified?
[01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:15.000]  I don't know. How are we going to fix that one?
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:16.000]  What do you mean?
[01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:18.000]  I'd love to be involved.
[01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  The thing that you put out earlier about, excuse me, I've got my paperwork all construed here.
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:33.000]  Are you talking about the Facebook article that you were commenting on?
[01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:35.000]  No, no, no, no, no, not the Facebook article.
[01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:40.000]  I was talking about the going back to common law.
[01:47:40.000 --> 01:47:44.000]  I've never said anything about going back to common law.
[01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:47.000]  Well, we've always been in common law.
[01:47:47.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  Well, yes and no. You have to fully understand what common law is.
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:47:57.000]  There's a lot of misconception about what common law is.
[01:47:57.000 --> 01:48:02.000]  There are two versions of common law that I believe in here.
[01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:10.000]  One is the way the attorneys and courts define it, which is judge-made law, and I completely disagree with that.
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  What my version and understanding of the common law is, is the origination of individual rights pursuant to the Declaration in the Magna Carta,
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  where the people finally had recourse against the king for abuses.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:30.000]  That was a law common in England to everyone.
[01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:34.000]  That's the way I prefer to view common law.
[01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  Yes.
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  Okay, so it really depends upon what description of common law we're talking about as to whether or not I'm willing to say, yeah, okay, I agree.
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:55.000]  Okay, I had some paperwork that you just put out recently, and it just escaped my hands because I got all my wife's paperwork in front of me,
[01:48:55.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  so my apologies on that.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:48:59.000]  Well, no worries.
[01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:01.000]  I'm prepared.
[01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:11.000]  But yeah, if I wrote about that, then that's the understanding that I wrote it from, the Magna Carta version of common law and common right.
[01:49:11.000 --> 01:49:19.000]  Yeah, I actually read your whole documentation, and it was impressive, absolutely impressive.
[01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:25.000]  And, holy crap, you were a cop?
[01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:29.000]  I was a deputy sheriff for a while, yeah, and ex-military to boot.
[01:49:29.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  That's a joke.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:34.000]  Hey, my whole family's law, of course.
[01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  My father was a secret service and police officer before that.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:51.000]  My younger brother, Mike, is a Texas Ranger, and he's on the U.S. Marshal Task Force.
[01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:59.000]  So, you know, him and I, we don't have good conversation come Christmastime.
[01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:01.000]  I understand.
[01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:02.000]  I understand.
[01:50:02.000 --> 01:50:12.000]  But when I get my dad to back me up, and when I said, hey, you know, unless I'm involved in an auto accident, you can't write me a ticket for speeding.
[01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:16.000]  And my brother's like, oh, that's BS, blah, blah, blah.
[01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:19.000]  And my dad says, your brother's right.
[01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:21.000]  You've got to love it.
[01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:23.000]  You've got to love it.
[01:50:23.000 --> 01:50:27.000]  Well, they would have to want to understand before they ever will.
[01:50:27.000 --> 01:50:33.000]  All right, Rick, I'm sorry, man, but do the federal stuff I was telling you about, get that done, and go from there.
[01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:35.000]  But right now I've got to get to somebody else, okay?
[01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:36.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:37.000]  Go take care of it.
[01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:38.000]  Have a good one.
[01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:39.000]  You too.
[01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:43.000]  All right, now we've got Jay in Texas who has been patiently hanging on.
[01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:45.000]  Go ahead, Jay.
[01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:55.000]  That I have, and unfortunately we don't have much time, so, and I was going to go off subject, but I'll make it brief.
[01:50:55.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  I know that your primary objective and your views and most of your writing has to do with transportation code.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:09.000]  Well, I do criminal, period, but transportation code is the most prominent of that, yes.
[01:51:09.000 --> 01:51:16.000]  Okay, so Ben, I would just like to touch on what is obviously not in this span of time,
[01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:23.000]  but I would still like to kind of pick your brain at it for a second and get your views as far as property tax.
[01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:25.000]  Okay.
[01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:26.000]  What's the pick?
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  Property taxes on private property are completely unconstitutional and unlawful.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:33.000]  Amen.
[01:51:33.000 --> 01:51:39.000]  Now, I went up against, I called them and spoke with them on the phone.
[01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:46.000]  I got sent to the assessor's office, and he didn't get to talk to him because I actually asked to talk to him as secretary,
[01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:53.000]  and my approach to them was let's establish jurisdiction first.
[01:51:53.000 --> 01:52:02.000]  And that was to, I wanted them to provide me with evidence that their code even applies to me
[01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:05.000]  simply because I'm physically intact.
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  Yeah, I know.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:08.000]  You're doing the Mark Stevens thing.
[01:52:08.000 --> 01:52:11.000]  Well, they kept going back to, well, it was working.
[01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:21.000]  I mean, for the purposes of what I was trying to accomplish, that was kind of validating that play.
[01:52:21.000 --> 01:52:25.000]  And they just kept rotating back to the tax code.
[01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:29.000]  I said, I understand where you're getting your information from, but you still haven't established,
[01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:36.000]  I mean, you're kind of asking me to follow the employee's handbook or company I don't even work for.
[01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:41.000]  Now, is that a bad approach or is there a better approach?
[01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:46.000]  I've read this tax code so many times, and I know there's got to be something about that.
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:54.000]  The best approach is to show the history of how property, see, here's the thing that they wish to avoid at all costs.
[01:52:54.000 --> 01:52:59.000]  All land in Texas was granted to the people that were in possession of it at the time of the grant
[01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  by a loyal title through a land patent, okay?
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:10.000]  Absolute top tier, no superior title to the land, okay?
[01:53:10.000 --> 01:53:16.000]  That land patent is a contractual agreement between the state of Texas
[01:53:16.000 --> 01:53:21.000]  and the individual who purchased that contract of land, period.
[01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:28.000]  It is enforceable as such, but no one ever does it.
[01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:33.000]  The terms of the land patent are very, very clear,
[01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  that this removes from any and all jurisdiction and claims of the state of Texas
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  the land delegated by and bequeathed by that land patent
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:56.000]  to this individual, all of their heirs, and all of their assigns forever.
[01:53:56.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  That's the end of the discussion.
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  There's nothing else to talk about.
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:05.000]  Okay, I did go down that road.
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:09.000]  I even went and searched my deed card.
[01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:11.000]  What the hell is a deed card?
[01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:15.000]  A deed card is not a patent.
[01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:19.000]  Okay, we'll stick to that trail.
[01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  From what I've gathered, I haven't heard of anybody who's ever gotten a loyal title.
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:26.000]  Sure you have.
[01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  They just don't know what to do with it when they have it.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:33.000]  I know lots of people that have land patents and copies of the patent in their name
[01:54:33.000 --> 01:54:36.000]  and don't know what to do with it.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:39.000]  But what they have to do is sue the state
[01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:44.000]  or at least the tax collectors of the state for breach of contract
[01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:49.000]  and for fraud because that's what it is.
[01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:52.000]  Because they're coming after me and my name's not on that.
[01:54:52.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  You have to have the land patent carried forward in your name.
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:55:02.000]  This is exactly why the Texas Land Office now refuses to do their job
[01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:09.000]  under the code that established their office to carry forward that land patent.
[01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  That is their job.
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:17.000]  That's their duty and they don't do it.
[01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:22.000]  But every piece of land in Texas that was not reserved for the use of the public
[01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:28.000]  that was sold or given to a private individual under a land patent
[01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  is no longer within any taxing authority of the state.
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  In order to negate the tax assessor's office,
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:47.000]  I need to be in possession of that title.
[01:55:47.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  Right, because you don't have standing until your name is on that patent.
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:58.000]  I knew I was going down the right road when I started doing this a while ago
[01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:05.000]  and I finally gave up and paid them and I just don't want to do it again.
[01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:12.000]  Well, that's because those same attorneys that are stealing land
[01:56:12.000 --> 01:56:15.000]  out from under people hand over fist here in the state
[01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:20.000]  are creating the laws and the regulations that allow these governmental entities
[01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:25.000]  to not do their job so that the people cannot fight back.
[01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:29.000]  You can't fight deprivation of your property and taxation of your property
[01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:35.000]  and you can't prove that you are the elodial title holder through that land patent.
[01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:38.000]  You have no standing to fight the tax.
[01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:43.000]  That's what they're counting on.
[01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:47.000]  So is there a resolution?
[01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:50.000]  The only thing you can do is sue the land patent office
[01:56:50.000 --> 01:56:55.000]  and the tax collector at the federal level to show that there's a contract in place
[01:56:55.000 --> 01:57:01.000]  that they won't fulfill and they have a duty to do so.
[01:57:01.000 --> 01:57:04.000]  Here, folks, all of you with these property tax issues,
[01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  here's what I would recommend you do first and foremost.
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:13.000]  Study the statutory scheme that creates the Texas Land Office,
[01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:19.000]  Office of Land Management, that prescribes the duties of that office,
[01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:23.000]  that discusses the process of the patent,
[01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:35.000]  that they are required to carry forward by contractual agreement with the prior owner.
[01:57:35.000 --> 01:57:38.000]  This is another reason why I tell you, folks, when you buy something,
[01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:41.000]  get a bill of sale for it.
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:47.000]  You buy a house, you buy a piece of land, not only do you need to get that deed to it,
[01:57:47.000 --> 01:57:51.000]  you need to get a bill of sale.
[01:57:51.000 --> 01:57:59.000]  That bill of sale is your actual proof of equity ownership instead of legal ownership,
[01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:02.000]  which is all that deed represents.
[01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  They are not the same thing.
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  You're going to get a deed, but you also need to get a bill of sale.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:22.000]  That's what proves you are the complete equity owner of that piece of property.
[01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  All right, folks, I'm sorry, Jay, I've got to go.
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  All right, everybody, I'm sorry I wasn't able to get to everyone.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:29.000]  I apologize, but time is what it is.
[01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  It flies faster than I can at times.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:35.000]  All right, folks, you all have a great week, good night, and God bless,
[01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:38.000]  and thank you so much for listening, and please support the network.
[01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:44.000]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and donate however much you can as often as you can.
[01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:46.000]  Keep us here working for you.
[01:58:46.000 --> 01:58:48.000]  You all have a great night.
[01:58:48.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  God bless you.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:55.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible
[01:58:55.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:01.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes
[01:59:01.000 --> 01:59:04.000]  that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:26.000]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:35.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:35.000 --> 01:59:40.000]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.000 --> 01:59:49.000]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.000 --> 02:00:02.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.