[00:00.000 --> 00:05.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:05.000 --> 00:15.000]  Markets for Friday the 10th of February 2017 are currently treading with gold at $1,233.40 an ounce, silver $17.94 an ounce,
[00:15.000 --> 00:24.000]  Texas crude $53 a barrel, and Bitcoin is sitting at about 1,004 U.S. currency.
[00:24.000 --> 00:32.000]  Today in history, the year 1996, IBM's Deep Blue supercomputer defeats Russian chess grandmaster, former world chess champion,
[00:32.000 --> 00:40.000]  writer and political activist, considered by many to the greatest chess player of all time, Gary Gasparov, in chess for the first time.
[00:40.000 --> 00:43.000]  Today in history.
[00:43.000 --> 00:49.000]  In recent news, in an interview with Yahoo News, released Friday today, Syrian President Bashar Assad stated that
[00:49.000 --> 00:55.000]  the United States is welcome to join the battle against terrorists in Syria, so long as it's in cooperation with his government.
[00:55.000 --> 01:02.000]  Only problem and contention is that Assad's government has labeled all armed opposition, including U.S.-backed rebel fighters, as terrorists.
[01:02.000 --> 01:09.000]  Syria has been in turmoil for six years of civil war, which has killed more than 300,000 people and displaced half of the country's population.
[01:09.000 --> 01:14.000]  Coupled with the rise of ISIS, which many suspect to be coordinating with the U.S.-supported rebels,
[01:14.000 --> 01:20.000]  and their 2014 takeover of about a third of both Syria and Iraq, Assad has had his hands full.
[01:20.000 --> 01:28.000]  In fact, the rebels posed a serious threat to Assad for about a year, that is until Russia in 2015 joined Syria's war, backing Assad's forces.
[01:28.000 --> 01:32.000]  Assad emphasized in the interview that sending U.S. troops would not be enough.
[01:32.000 --> 01:36.000]  Respecting Syria's sovereignty and building diplomatic trust is crucial.
[01:36.000 --> 01:43.000]  Assad would not comment on Trump's move to indefinitely bar Syrian refugees from entering the U.S., calling it an issue of American sovereignty.
[01:43.000 --> 01:51.000]  He did end up saying that there are definitely terrorists among the millions of Syrian refugees seeking refuge in the West.
[01:51.000 --> 01:57.000]  Dr. Oren Gutfeld, one of the lead archaeologists on Operation Scroll, a joint effort by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
[01:57.000 --> 02:03.000]  the Israel Antiquities Authority, the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, and the Civil Administration of Judea and Samaria,
[02:03.000 --> 02:09.000]  caused an archaeological stir when his team and others found an undiscovered cave with more artifacts from the Qomran community,
[02:09.000 --> 02:13.000]  famous for the Dead Sea Scrolls which were uncovered in the area in the 1940s and 50s.
[02:13.000 --> 02:21.000]  Everything from pottery shards, broken scroll storage jars and lids, Neolithic flint tools and arrowheads were scattered at the cave's entrance.
[02:21.000 --> 02:25.000]  After the team started picking away, they found an unbroken storage jar with a scroll in it.
[02:25.000 --> 02:30.000]  The scroll was rushed to Hebrew University's conservation lab where it was analyzed in a protected environment.
[02:30.000 --> 02:34.000]  Unfortunately, it had no writing on it and appears to have been placed in the jar to prepare it for writing.
[02:34.000 --> 02:39.000]  Further in, they discovered an intentional cave-in which had a tunnel of about 16 to 20 feet in length
[02:39.000 --> 02:44.000]  where they found three broken storage jars and lids along with cloth coverings and leather straps
[02:44.000 --> 02:49.000]  that bound the scrolls that the team thinks looters ransacked around the 1950s.
[02:49.000 --> 02:54.000]  As of late, researchers believe that the Dead Sea Scroll fragments have made their way onto the Antiquity black market.
[02:54.000 --> 03:04.000]  This is Rick Brody with your Lowdown for February 10th, 2017.
[03:24.000 --> 03:34.000]  Thank you for watching!
[03:54.000 --> 04:00.000]  Yep, there you go, folks.
[04:00.000 --> 04:05.000]  It is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:05.000 --> 04:13.000]  It is February 13th, 2017, the day before Valentine's Day.
[04:13.000 --> 04:21.000]  And I was given some information prior to the show tonight that I potentially may have some new listeners out there
[04:21.000 --> 04:26.000]  that are actually involved in the law enforcement and judicial communities.
[04:26.000 --> 04:29.000]  If that is true and you are hearing the sound of my voice,
[04:29.000 --> 04:35.000]  I would request that you please keep an open mind with what you're about to hear
[04:35.000 --> 04:45.000]  and try not to take anything I say about the profession or any of the things that you guys do on a daily basis too personally.
[04:45.000 --> 04:50.000]  This is not directed at any one of you that isn't doing this.
[04:50.000 --> 04:55.000]  But for some reason, those that are seem to take a front to being exposed and doing it.
[04:55.000 --> 04:57.000]  So if it's not you, no reason to take offense.
[04:57.000 --> 05:04.000]  If it is you, well, maybe it's time to consider that you're not hiding as much as you thought you were, okay?
[05:04.000 --> 05:10.000]  Now, what I would like to do tonight, before I open the phones, and the phones are off,
[05:10.000 --> 05:17.000]  so if you're attempting to call in and not getting anywhere, that would be why, I will announce when I'm going to turn them on.
[05:17.000 --> 05:23.000]  But what I would like to try to do tonight before I do that is to present to you a little bit of some information
[05:23.000 --> 05:30.000]  that is going to be going up in the next article on the blog as soon as we can get this thing massaged into a web-ready format.
[05:30.000 --> 05:33.000]  Just a word to those out there in the world.
[05:33.000 --> 05:44.000]  Microsoft Word has the absolute worst HTML conversion engine that exists, okay?
[05:44.000 --> 05:51.000]  I think Notepad does a better job of converting plain text to HTML than Word does.
[05:51.000 --> 05:57.000]  So whenever you do something in Microsoft Word that you want to preserve a specific format to,
[05:57.000 --> 06:06.000]  especially when it comes to things like numbered lists, it takes a lot of hand-tweaking,
[06:06.000 --> 06:11.000]  especially if it's an extensive document, to make that thing web-ready.
[06:11.000 --> 06:18.000]  And so I have some assistance from a very nice young fellow that offered to do that for me who's good in the web world
[06:18.000 --> 06:23.000]  and has more time to do it than I do.
[06:23.000 --> 06:25.000]  With all the writing I'm trying to do on this,
[06:25.000 --> 06:28.000]  massaging it into a web article is not something I have time for,
[06:28.000 --> 06:39.000]  considering this is also the outline for the new version of the constitutional challenge to the recodification
[06:39.000 --> 06:48.000]  of the existing transportation code via SB 971 in 1995 by the 74th legislature.
[06:48.000 --> 06:53.000]  Now, when I began this outline, I started out very simply.
[06:53.000 --> 06:56.000]  By the time the outline was done, it was a page and a half long.
[06:56.000 --> 07:11.000]  As of today, a week or two weeks later, the outline with some details placed into the outline is 18 pages.
[07:11.000 --> 07:21.000]  So just so you know, this is going to be a very intense rewrite and a very focused and directed rewrite when it's done.
[07:21.000 --> 07:30.000]  But it will blow a few judicial heads wide open once they read it,
[07:30.000 --> 07:42.000]  because this document exposes via their own statutes, their own statutory history, their own legislation and case law
[07:42.000 --> 07:57.000]  about just exactly how incompetent and corrupt their implementation and interpretation of virtually every statute out there really is.
[07:57.000 --> 08:10.000]  Now, this one relates entirely to the transportation code and those statutes relating to how codes are to be written and interpreted.
[08:10.000 --> 08:20.000]  Believe it or not, Texas was intelligent enough to write those rules down in an actual statute
[08:20.000 --> 08:27.000]  and make that statute binding upon all the departments of government.
[08:27.000 --> 08:41.000]  The problem is, none of them know these statutes exist apparently, which means they are trying to claim ignorance of the law is an excuse.
[08:41.000 --> 08:58.000]  And if they do know, then they are intentionally ignoring them and they are now guilty of a penal code violation under Chapter 71 or 72 of the penal code.
[08:58.000 --> 09:03.000]  I think it's 71, organized criminal activity.
[09:03.000 --> 09:20.000]  Because they are working in concert and collusion to use the statute to defraud the people of Texas through their misapplication, misinterpretation, misadjudication
[09:20.000 --> 09:31.000]  and their misogynistic theft of our money to enrich the state coffers illegally and unconstitutional.
[09:31.000 --> 09:37.000]  So that being said, I want to get into this outline a little bit and just listen carefully to what we're dealing with here.
[09:37.000 --> 09:42.000]  Now, last week I talked to you a little bit about terms of art.
[09:42.000 --> 09:53.000]  A lot of what this document begins with explains why opinions like that given by the Third Court of Appeals in the case that I read to you two or three weeks ago
[09:53.000 --> 10:10.000]  on their opinion for transportation, the terms of art goes directly to their knowing and willful denial of what a term of art even is and how that term of art must be interpreted.
[10:10.000 --> 10:14.000]  They cannot interpret it any way they want.
[10:14.000 --> 10:20.000]  They cannot ignore the proper interpretation if it exists.
[10:20.000 --> 10:21.000]  Why?
[10:21.000 --> 10:31.000]  Because Chapter 311 and 312 of the Texas Government Code doesn't let them do it that way.
[10:31.000 --> 10:34.000]  And that's something I'll be getting into as we get down through here.
[10:34.000 --> 10:39.000]  So what I'm going to do is I'm not going to go into detail there, so I am not going to read all 18 pages of this.
[10:39.000 --> 10:44.000]  This thing's almost 7,000 words just on these 18 pages, so I'm not going to do that.
[10:44.000 --> 10:51.000]  But I am going to give you some of the more pertinent details from it so that you'll have that information floating around in your head.
[10:51.000 --> 10:56.000]  And when this whole thing hits the blog article, knock yourself out.
[10:56.000 --> 11:04.000]  This is going to be a literal trough of information for everybody to feed from.
[11:04.000 --> 11:10.000]  I'm not giving you everything that's going to be in the Constitutional Challenge Motion in detail.
[11:10.000 --> 11:27.000]  But I am going to provide you with a common-sense statute, case law, and industry standard interpretation of how the challenge works and why it must work.
[11:27.000 --> 11:29.000]  Okay?
[11:29.000 --> 11:43.000]  Now, that being said, item number one in our list here is unconstitutional judicial alteration of well-established law on the proper meaning and use of terms of art,
[11:43.000 --> 11:55.000]  thus unconstitutionally affecting legislative purpose and intent while unlawfully expanding the scope of legislation.
[11:55.000 --> 12:09.000]  Now, that is a descriptive title of exactly the type of activity every Texas court is engaging in when they adjudicate a transportation-related offense.
[12:09.000 --> 12:16.000]  I'll get into detail on that with the rest of this, but that is what they're doing.
[12:16.000 --> 12:27.000]  All right, sub-item A, the term transportation according to the United States Supreme Court in the case of Interstate Commerce Commission versus Brimson,
[12:27.000 --> 12:49.000]  154 U.S. 447 and 14 Supreme Court 1125 at page 38, or I'm sorry, 1125, tells us that transportation has a specific definition of transporting person's goods or the movement of person's goods or property
[12:49.000 --> 12:53.000]  from one place to another by a carrier.
[12:53.000 --> 13:02.000]  Okay? A carrier by definition, both in the federal law that defines the term and in the state law that adopts the term,
[13:02.000 --> 13:17.000]  a carrier is someone who is engaged in the business of transporting person's goods or property upon the land for compensation or hire.
[13:17.000 --> 13:23.000]  Okay? Or another way they put it is private profit or gain.
[13:23.000 --> 13:25.000]  That's what a carrier is.
[13:25.000 --> 13:43.000]  There's somebody that is either a business itself that is doing it or it is someone who is acting under the authority or umbrella of a business to perform the actual activity of transportation itself.
[13:43.000 --> 13:47.000]  They're transporting person's goods or property.
[13:47.000 --> 13:50.000]  Okay?
[13:50.000 --> 14:00.000]  Now, it is not directly related to the actions and activities of the general public acting in their private common law capacities and activities.
[14:00.000 --> 14:02.000]  And that's exactly true.
[14:02.000 --> 14:10.000]  A term of art has a specific meaning within the specific context of a profession or occupation.
[14:10.000 --> 14:14.000]  That is exactly what the legal definition of a term of art is.
[14:14.000 --> 14:16.000]  We know this because I read it to you last week.
[14:16.000 --> 14:23.000]  For instance, the online version of the Oxford English Dictionary defines term of art this way,
[14:23.000 --> 14:36.000]  a word or phrase that has a precise specialized meaning within a particular field or profession.
[14:36.000 --> 14:46.000]  While the online version of West Encyclopedia of American Law, edition two, defines term of art this way,
[14:46.000 --> 14:52.000]  a word or phrase that has special meaning in a particular context.
[14:52.000 --> 15:00.000]  And then the West Encyclopedia actually gives us a more in-depth explanation of that, which I'm not going to get into because this will go up on the block.
[15:00.000 --> 15:06.000]  But needless to say, it makes it very, very clear that it is not simply any context.
[15:06.000 --> 15:15.000]  It is a context related to an occupation or a particular field of endeavor, a profession.
[15:15.000 --> 15:16.000]  Okay?
[15:16.000 --> 15:18.000]  That's what it is.
[15:18.000 --> 15:27.000]  Now, transportation being a term of art, and we know it's a term of art because it has a specialized legal definition
[15:27.000 --> 15:30.000]  outside of the definition used in common English.
[15:30.000 --> 15:34.000]  That qualifies it as a term of art.
[15:34.000 --> 15:43.000]  It is a term used by a specific profession or industry for which they have a standardized meaning and use.
[15:43.000 --> 15:47.000]  That qualifies it as a term of art.
[15:47.000 --> 15:48.000]  You get it?
[15:48.000 --> 15:56.000]  Because obviously judges, prosecutors, and anyone else with a law degree doesn't seem to get it.
[15:56.000 --> 16:06.000]  But this is their own rules that set it up this way so that they're required to understand it and use it this way, and they don't.
[16:06.000 --> 16:17.000]  And this is where the cheek in their armor exists, their own ignorance about their own rules.
[16:17.000 --> 16:21.000]  The better you know what they're supposed to do and how they're supposed to do it,
[16:21.000 --> 16:31.000]  the easier it will be for you to recognize when they are failing to do so and to object to that and preserve that error
[16:31.000 --> 16:35.000]  and then challenge them on it to boot.
[16:35.000 --> 16:36.000]  All right.
[16:36.000 --> 16:37.000]  That is the first segment.
[16:37.000 --> 16:41.000]  We will be coming up in the second one when we get back, so y'all hang in there.
[16:41.000 --> 16:43.000]  And the phones will still be off the next segment.
[16:43.000 --> 16:47.000]  Like I say, there's a bit of this to go through, and I know there's people wanting to call in,
[16:47.000 --> 16:52.000]  but I please ask for your indulgence because I want this information to be out there,
[16:52.000 --> 16:54.000]  and I want y'all to read it on the blog when it hits.
[16:54.000 --> 17:21.000]  So y'all hang on, and we will be right back.
[17:24.000 --> 17:27.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:54.000 --> 17:57.000]  We'll be right back.
[18:24.000 --> 18:26.000]  We'll be right back.
[19:24.000 --> 19:46.000]  All right, folks.
[19:46.000 --> 19:47.000]  We are back.
[19:47.000 --> 19:51.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Monday night show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[19:51.000 --> 19:55.000]  And real quick, if you don't know about it yet, please consider going
[19:55.000 --> 20:02.000]  and taking a look at the home page of logosradionetwork.com in the top left-hand front page.
[20:02.000 --> 20:06.000]  There's a big black box talking about our fundraiser for the year.
[20:06.000 --> 20:14.000]  The grand prize for the fundraiser is an AR-15 rifle donated by South Texas Gunworks.
[20:14.000 --> 20:17.000]  Please look at that for all the information and the details.
[20:17.000 --> 20:21.000]  So the traffic seminar, if you don't have it, would be a good idea,
[20:21.000 --> 20:27.000]  but a purchase of it gets you 10 entries into that drawing.
[20:27.000 --> 20:32.000]  A purchase of Randy's book gets you four entries into that drawing.
[20:32.000 --> 20:36.000]  A purchase of the Constitutional Challenge Motion, which isn't available there yet,
[20:36.000 --> 20:39.000]  but will be, will get you more.
[20:39.000 --> 20:43.000]  So just hang in there because all those details will come,
[20:43.000 --> 20:47.000]  but go look there for the fundraiser, look at the details for the AR-15,
[20:47.000 --> 20:52.000]  and if you can, make a donation that will get you in the drawing, and good luck.
[20:52.000 --> 20:53.000]  All right.
[20:53.000 --> 21:04.000]  Now, these next couple of paragraphs or more are directed specifically at the patronet listeners that,
[21:04.000 --> 21:11.000]  and you know who you are, that have all these wacky legal theories about how words operate in law
[21:11.000 --> 21:19.000]  and all this kind of stuff, but nobody seems to be able to get them to comprehend how this actually is done
[21:19.000 --> 21:23.000]  and the way it's done especially.
[21:23.000 --> 21:27.000]  So I'm going to try that now with what I'm about to put out here.
[21:27.000 --> 21:34.000]  So just listen carefully because this, from my discussion with a lot of these folks on Facebook
[21:34.000 --> 21:40.000]  and other places, I hope I addressed here.
[21:40.000 --> 21:45.000]  It's that lack of understanding of trying to create a language from another created language
[21:45.000 --> 21:51.000]  and act like you understand it when in fact you do not that is causing most of the confusion, I think,
[21:51.000 --> 21:57.000]  that or they really have brain damage, you know, whatever.
[21:57.000 --> 22:07.000]  But anyway, when we are interacting with it in any way, the legal system constantly and subversively
[22:07.000 --> 22:17.000]  presumes and construes our every use of language as being the same as its own legal terms of art
[22:17.000 --> 22:23.000]  rather than the real common English meaning and usage.
[22:23.000 --> 22:32.000]  The primary reason that there is any misunderstanding at all about this fact is because those operating professionally
[22:32.000 --> 22:41.000]  within the system are constantly telling the rest of us that unless the law creates a specific definition
[22:41.000 --> 22:51.000]  for a given term or phrase, then they too, meaning the legal system, are always using regular English words
[22:51.000 --> 23:00.000]  and sentences in their everyday common and ordinary meaning and context rather than legal terms and phrases
[23:00.000 --> 23:07.000]  of art having an entirely legal meaning and context.
[23:07.000 --> 23:19.000]  But this is a lie because they have neither the authority nor any legitimate purpose or capacity
[23:19.000 --> 23:33.000]  for addressing or dealing with any one of we the people except in the context of and in relationship to some breach of law
[23:33.000 --> 23:39.000]  or legal duty and any related legal process associated therewith.
[23:39.000 --> 23:49.000]  Do you understand that, folks? You cannot have a common English conversation with a public servant of any kind,
[23:49.000 --> 24:01.000]  doesn't matter what it is, about anything at all relating to their official capacity and duties.
[24:01.000 --> 24:11.000]  In that instance, everything that is said is construed by them to mean what they understand
[24:11.000 --> 24:23.000]  in relation to their language of law, not common English. You get it?
[24:23.000 --> 24:34.000]  They cannot interact with us and speak to us in any other way because they have no legitimate authority
[24:34.000 --> 24:41.000]  to do so in an official capacity except in that one. You understand now?
[24:41.000 --> 24:50.000]  They have to be speaking legalese to us. The problem is you think you're talking English back to them.
[24:50.000 --> 25:02.000]  You aren't, at least not in their ears. Their filter only hears it as legalese.
[25:02.000 --> 25:09.000]  Think of it as an English to legal translator. Okay?
[25:09.000 --> 25:16.000]  It's automatic. Nothing you can do about it because that's the only language it's meant to convert everything to.
[25:16.000 --> 25:21.000]  Just like on Star Trek, their little communicator pen, doesn't matter who they're talking to,
[25:21.000 --> 25:30.000]  it translates their language into the language they are most familiar with and can comprehend.
[25:30.000 --> 25:37.000]  Well, that's what's happening. And you go in there talking away thinking you're making sense to them.
[25:37.000 --> 25:45.000]  Sometimes you are and sometimes you aren't, but not necessarily in the way you think you are.
[25:45.000 --> 25:48.000]  Now, let's get on with that part of it.
[25:48.000 --> 25:54.000]  This is the entire reason that the system of law was developed or has developed its own language,
[25:54.000 --> 26:02.000]  as well as law-related dictionaries containing the definitions of its legal terms and phrases.
[26:02.000 --> 26:10.000]  These legal dictionaries are positive proof that a term or phrase of art actually means something different
[26:10.000 --> 26:20.000]  when used in relation to law, which is the only way that our public servants and the courts can use it.
[26:20.000 --> 26:28.000]  Okay? And it does so despite the common English manner that we the people use
[26:28.000 --> 26:34.000]  for that identical word or phrase every single day. Okay?
[26:34.000 --> 26:46.000]  They're really talking to different languages that appear and sound identical, but are not.
[26:46.000 --> 26:51.000]  They just aren't. Okay?
[26:51.000 --> 26:56.000]  Now, just in case you've never listened to this part of the show before, I'm going to give you some statutes,
[26:56.000 --> 27:00.000]  and you need to write them down and read them carefully and become very familiar with them.
[27:00.000 --> 27:10.000]  They're not very long, they're easy to find, and they will clear up an awful lot
[27:10.000 --> 27:15.000]  despite how messed up your public servants try to make it. Okay?
[27:15.000 --> 27:20.000]  So understand that and apply it accordingly.
[27:20.000 --> 27:27.000]  Right now, the statutes you need to understand very well, and that means reading them
[27:27.000 --> 27:35.000]  and tearing them apart word by word, term by term, and phrase by phrase is all in the government code.
[27:35.000 --> 27:40.000]  All of them are in the government code, not any other code, the government code.
[27:40.000 --> 27:45.000]  You need to look specifically at chapters 311 and 312.
[27:45.000 --> 27:50.000]  And within those two chapters, you need to look specifically at these statutes.
[27:50.000 --> 28:19.000]  And there are six. 311.011, 311.016, 311.021, 312.001, 312.002,
[28:19.000 --> 28:26.000]  and 312.005 of the Texas government code.
[28:26.000 --> 28:31.000]  Now I'm going to tell you why these six statutes are so important.
[28:31.000 --> 28:39.000]  Section 311.011, common and technical usage of words.
[28:39.000 --> 28:49.000]  Subitem A, words and phrases shall be read in context
[28:49.000 --> 28:55.000]  and construed according to the rules of grammar and common usage.
[28:55.000 --> 29:05.000]  Subitem B, words and phrases that have acquired a technical or particular meaning
[29:05.000 --> 29:15.000]  whether by legislative definition or otherwise shall be construed accordingly.
[29:15.000 --> 29:20.000]  Now let me explain those two sections to you really quick.
[29:20.000 --> 29:25.000]  When it says in A, words and phrases shall be read in context,
[29:25.000 --> 29:32.000]  how many of you can guess what that is actually saying in relation to context?
[29:32.000 --> 29:36.000]  Think about that over the break because when we get back,
[29:36.000 --> 29:42.000]  I'm going to prove that you didn't understand the question I asked and what I just read to you
[29:42.000 --> 29:47.000]  because I want to show you what it really means by context when we get back.
[29:47.000 --> 29:49.000]  All right, folks, you all hang in there.
[29:49.000 --> 29:52.000]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[29:52.000 --> 29:56.000]  Please check out Logos Radio Network homepage for the fundraiser,
[29:56.000 --> 30:03.000]  and we'll be right back after this break.
[30:03.000 --> 30:07.000]  When the sentence form arrives, plenty of people fill out silly things,
[30:07.000 --> 30:11.000]  but fictitious job titles like Jedi Knight are apparently nothing new.
[30:11.000 --> 30:17.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you about a 19th century pastor with a sense of humor.
[30:17.000 --> 30:19.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:19.000 --> 30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:28.000]  So protect your rights.
[30:28.000 --> 30:32.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:38.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:38.000 --> 30:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:51.000]  Historian Peter Kitson studies antique census forms in church registers
[30:51.000 --> 30:54.000]  looking for occupational facts that date back centuries.
[30:54.000 --> 30:58.000]  It can be a boring job, but when he found a parchment from 1819
[30:58.000 --> 31:03.000]  by the very reverend Dr. Peter Scrimshire Wood, he actually laughed out loud.
[31:03.000 --> 31:08.000]  The reverend had enlightened his boring job with some very creative job titles,
[31:08.000 --> 31:13.000]  including Knight of the Needle for a Tailor, Beggar Maker for a Government Official,
[31:13.000 --> 31:15.000]  and Master of the Burnt Crust for a Baker.
[31:15.000 --> 31:19.000]  He even wrote Mantrap for a Woman of Questionable Morals.
[31:19.000 --> 31:23.000]  It's a 200-year-old joke that gets a laugh even today.
[31:23.000 --> 31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:31.000 --> 31:37.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:37.000 --> 31:39.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:39.000 --> 31:44.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:44.000 --> 31:47.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:47.000 --> 31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow force responders are dying.
[31:49.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:51.000 --> 31:52.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:52.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:53.000 --> 31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:54.000 --> 31:56.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:56.000 --> 31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.000 --> 32:02.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:08.000 --> 32:10.000]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.000 --> 32:18.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:18.000 --> 32:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:23.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:23.000 --> 32:26.000]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:32.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.000 --> 32:34.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:38.000 --> 32:41.000]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:43.000 --> 32:46.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:48.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:14.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve.
[33:14.000 --> 33:26.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I'm going to solve them through the help of government them, prosecute them.
[33:26.000 --> 33:30.000]  Okay.
[33:30.000 --> 33:55.000]  Well, for some reason it looks like my bumper music is getting chased around again, but that's okay.
[33:55.000 --> 33:57.000]  We'll deal with that at another point.
[33:57.000 --> 34:05.000]  Now, before I give away to you the answer to 311.001's context question before the break,
[34:05.000 --> 34:11.000]  I need to read you the next section so that you understand what I'm about to tell you.
[34:11.000 --> 34:18.000]  In section 311.016, we see may, shall, must, et cetera.
[34:18.000 --> 34:23.000]  The following constructions apply unless the context in which the word or phrase appears
[34:23.000 --> 34:31.000]  necessarily requires a different construction or unless a different construction is expressly provided by statute.
[34:31.000 --> 34:35.000]  It then gives us 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
[34:35.000 --> 34:38.000]  I'm going to read you 2, 3, and 4.
[34:38.000 --> 34:51.000]  2 says shall, the term shall, okay, S-H-A-L-L, imposes a duty, not an option,
[34:51.000 --> 35:02.000]  not a request, not a possibility, a duty, as in D-U-T-Y, not the little child kind with the diaper, okay?
[35:02.000 --> 35:04.000]  Keep that in mind, too.
[35:04.000 --> 35:10.000]  Though some of the stuff they do may as well be duty for all the good it does us when it comes to due process.
[35:10.000 --> 35:22.000]  Number 3, must, the term must, M-U-S-T, creates or recognizes a condition precedent.
[35:22.000 --> 35:31.000]  Number 4, is entitled to, three little words, is entitled to.
[35:31.000 --> 35:38.000]  That phrase means creates or recognizes a right.
[35:38.000 --> 35:44.000]  It either creates a right or it recognizes the existence of a right.
[35:44.000 --> 35:53.000]  Now, the reason that's going to be really important in this process is because if you remember 45.018B,
[35:53.000 --> 35:57.000]  when it comes to a copy of the criminal complaint being used against you prior,
[35:57.000 --> 36:05.000]  no later than one day prior to any proceeding in the prosecution under that complaint,
[36:05.000 --> 36:15.000]  the first part of 45.018B is the accused is entitled to.
[36:15.000 --> 36:28.000]  So that statute either A, creates a right, or B, it recognizes a right to have a copy of that complaint.
[36:28.000 --> 36:43.000]  But they never honor the right, and then on the appeal, they gloss over it as if the violation of that right means nothing.
[36:43.000 --> 36:45.000]  Keep that in mind.
[36:45.000 --> 36:55.000]  That's the kind of crooked mindset and I don't care cavalier attitude about your rights that a lot of these people have.
[36:55.000 --> 36:57.000]  Okay?
[36:57.000 --> 37:07.000]  Now, let's go back to 311, 311.011, and look at sub item A about shall be read in context.
[37:07.000 --> 37:19.000]  Remember, shall creates a duty upon every government official to read every word and phrase in context.
[37:19.000 --> 37:25.000]  Well, context in this case has two requirements, not one, two.
[37:25.000 --> 37:33.000]  It must be read not only in the context of the particular section of act in which it is found,
[37:33.000 --> 37:44.000]  but it must also be read in context with the legislative purpose and intent of the bill that created it.
[37:44.000 --> 37:55.000]  In other words, the subject that is the code in which it exists, okay?
[37:55.000 --> 37:58.000]  Now, let me explain what I mean by that.
[37:58.000 --> 38:15.000]  SB 971, the bill from 1995 put into play by the 74th legislature that allegedly recodified the then existing Vernon's annotated civil statutes into a singular, unified, reorganized,
[38:15.000 --> 38:24.000]  renumbered transportation code through one bill, that bill SB 971.
[38:24.000 --> 38:32.000]  The caption slash title of SB 971 says two things that we need to be aware of very, very clearly.
[38:32.000 --> 38:41.000]  One, it is a non-substantive revision of existing statutes.
[38:41.000 --> 38:47.000]  Non-substantive, non-substantive, however you wish to pronounce the word, means the same thing.
[38:47.000 --> 38:54.000]  We are making no changes of substance to the underlying statutes.
[38:54.000 --> 38:57.000]  We're not making anything new here, folks.
[38:57.000 --> 39:01.000]  That's what that means.
[39:01.000 --> 39:08.000]  The next words are relating to transportation.
[39:08.000 --> 39:17.000]  There, ladies and gentlemen, is your context for the entire code.
[39:17.000 --> 39:40.000]  The caption of the bill specifically says the singular subject as required by Article III, Section 35 of the Texas Constitution, Article III, Section 35A, specifically says one subject, and that subject, according to that bill caption, is transportation.
[39:40.000 --> 39:49.000]  That is the controlling context of every single thing that goes into that code.
[39:49.000 --> 39:55.000]  If we look at that code like it's a box, then you can think of it like this.
[39:55.000 --> 40:05.000]  The code is a box that will only allow and hold things relating to transportation within it.
[40:05.000 --> 40:13.000]  If it will not fit within the box of transportation, it cannot be put into the box of transportation.
[40:13.000 --> 40:15.000]  You get it?
[40:15.000 --> 40:32.000]  That is your controlling context, something the Third Court of Appeals, obviously populated by morons that need to go back to school, failed to address and tried to completely ignore.
[40:32.000 --> 40:36.000]  But little old me doesn't play that game, okay?
[40:36.000 --> 40:44.000]  As Damon Wings on In Living Color used to say it with homie to clown, homie don't play that, okay?
[40:44.000 --> 40:52.000]  They have a legal duty to interpret that appeal correctly.
[40:52.000 --> 40:56.000]  They utterly failed at every turn.
[40:56.000 --> 41:17.000]  In fact, the way that opinion is written, it would be damn near impossible to assert that they were not intentionally misconstruing the law to get an outcome they wanted rather than the one the law and justice required.
[41:17.000 --> 41:22.000]  And the opinion itself is proof of that.
[41:22.000 --> 41:28.000]  Why do you think that opinion put not for publication on it?
[41:28.000 --> 41:37.000]  So you can't use it, and you both certainly can't use it against them.
[41:37.000 --> 41:56.000]  Okay, so the context now that we know is not only within the specific section or chapter or whatever the term or phrase or object that we're dealing with is, it's context overall in relation to the subject matter, which is transportation, okay?
[41:56.000 --> 42:11.000]  Everything in that code must fit within the box of transportation or it doesn't belong there because if it is in that box and it is not related to transportation, it is an independent subject.
[42:11.000 --> 42:22.000]  Now we have a bill that is completely unconstitutional because it has more than one subject.
[42:22.000 --> 42:26.000]  And that's a violation of Article III, Section 35A.
[42:26.000 --> 42:35.000]  All bills shall have one subject, and that subject shall be expressed in the bill's caption or title, okay?
[42:35.000 --> 42:40.000]  So it's got to fit within transportation or it cannot be put in that code, period.
[42:40.000 --> 42:45.000]  This is something the Third Court of Appeals completely ignored, the context.
[42:45.000 --> 42:50.000]  So they violated their duty to follow this statute.
[42:50.000 --> 42:54.000]  What's worse is they cited this statute in the opinion.
[42:54.000 --> 43:01.000]  They cited it and then still freaking ignored it.
[43:01.000 --> 43:10.000]  But what they did not cite in any way, shape, or form was anything out of Chapter 312, which we will get to momentarily.
[43:10.000 --> 43:19.000]  Now that we know what 311.011 and 311.016 gives us, let's look at what 311.021 gives us.
[43:19.000 --> 43:23.000]  Intention in enactment of statutes.
[43:23.000 --> 43:39.000]  In enacting a statute, it is presumed that, one, compliance with the constitutions of this state and the United States is intended, okay?
[43:39.000 --> 43:50.000]  All right, now that we know what is intended by the first thing in intention in enactments of statutes, we'll look at the other two important parts of that when we get back.
[43:50.000 --> 43:52.000]  All right, folks, y'all hang in there.
[43:52.000 --> 43:54.000]  We'll be right back on the other side of this break.
[43:54.000 --> 43:57.000]  This is Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show.
[43:57.000 --> 44:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:00.000 --> 44:15.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.000 --> 44:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.000 --> 44:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.000 --> 44:34.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:07.000]  Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com.
[45:07.000 --> 45:19.000]  And I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas, behind Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:31.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:44.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:48.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.000 --> 45:51.000]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:19.000 --> 46:25.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:25.000 --> 46:29.000]  All right, let's continue on with this so we know what we're getting into here.
[46:29.000 --> 46:38.000]  All right, now we know that one, sub-item one of 311.021 says that compliance with the Constitution of this state in the United States is intended.
[46:38.000 --> 46:45.000]  So every statute is intended to be constitutional. They aren't, but so far they're intended to be, right?
[46:45.000 --> 46:51.000]  Number two, the entire statute is intended to be effective.
[46:51.000 --> 46:57.000]  Another thing the Third Court of Appeals failed miserably to do in their opinion.
[46:57.000 --> 47:14.000]  They quoted sections of the statutes they used as if they were completely isolated from the context and relationships of everything else relevant to the subject they were addressing to get the outcome they wanted.
[47:14.000 --> 47:22.000]  Three, a just and reasonable result is intended.
[47:22.000 --> 47:42.000]  What is just and reasonable about applying a regulatory code intended by the legislature to only apply to and be used against those engaging in a profession or occupation to defraud and steal money from the general public?
[47:42.000 --> 47:48.000]  What is just and reasonable in that result?
[47:48.000 --> 48:05.000]  You have been lied to, you have been stolen from, and their hands are still in your pockets and you don't seem to care.
[48:05.000 --> 48:12.000]  Four, a result feasible of execution is intended.
[48:12.000 --> 48:16.000]  Well, this requires a little bit of tracing through history.
[48:16.000 --> 48:32.000]  Up until, oh, 40 years or so after the invention of the motor car, did the people suddenly lose the right to locomotion via that device?
[48:32.000 --> 48:48.000]  Now, throughout our history, we have traveled between every state, every territory, every piece of property that we could by whatever common means of transportation or travel was available at the time.
[48:48.000 --> 48:59.000]  In the days of the Romans, it was on foot, on mule, by wagon, by chariot, whatever you had and could use, you could use on the road to get from point A to point B.
[48:59.000 --> 49:02.000]  No questions asked.
[49:02.000 --> 49:12.000]  Now, you may have to pay a road tax to the Romans because they control the roads with an army, but sometimes you did, sometimes you didn't.
[49:12.000 --> 49:18.000]  But at least you didn't have to have a license and a plate strapped to the ass of your horse, okay?
[49:18.000 --> 49:33.000]  Nobody branded a number in his butt and had you write it down at some local office so they could send you a ticket by runner for not stopping at the corner of fourth enrollment, okay?
[49:33.000 --> 49:54.000]  Now, move forward in time and that progresses once again on up the line through more feet travel, more wagon travel, more horseback travel, more mule train travel, more wagon train travel, more train travel until finally we get to the era of the motor car.
[49:54.000 --> 49:55.000]  There were no licenses.
[49:55.000 --> 49:56.000]  There were no regulations.
[49:56.000 --> 49:59.000]  There was none of those things in relation to motor cars.
[49:59.000 --> 50:06.000]  Just like any other invention of the day, they were invented, they were sold, people bought them.
[50:06.000 --> 50:08.000]  People could use them because they owned it.
[50:08.000 --> 50:10.000]  It was their property.
[50:10.000 --> 50:17.000]  And they could go as far and wide in any time in any manner they chose in their own property.
[50:17.000 --> 50:18.000]  Now, that's history, folks.
[50:18.000 --> 50:23.000]  Whether they like it or not, that is actual history.
[50:23.000 --> 50:52.000]  But for some reason 40 or so years after that invention took hold, the state suddenly got it in its mind that it could take away innovation from the people to move about and require the state's permission to now use property that they had already been using for years
[50:52.000 --> 50:55.000]  only with that permission.
[50:55.000 --> 51:02.000]  Now, that and any other state of mind would be an unlawful, unconstitutional government taking a private property.
[51:02.000 --> 51:11.000]  But for some reason they think if they can justify it, and I fail to see how, they cannot make you license a gun under the Second Amendment.
[51:11.000 --> 51:14.000]  They can't do it.
[51:14.000 --> 51:17.000]  They can't make you license yourself to carry it.
[51:17.000 --> 51:19.000]  I don't give a crap what the courts say.
[51:19.000 --> 51:24.000]  That is not what the Constitution says.
[51:24.000 --> 51:27.000]  It says that right shall not be infringed.
[51:27.000 --> 51:39.000]  When you tell me that I need some piece of paper from you to do it, you're infringing upon the exercise of that right.
[51:39.000 --> 51:43.000]  There is no other sensible way to understand that.
[51:43.000 --> 51:47.000]  There is only a corrupt criminal way to understand that.
[51:47.000 --> 51:56.000]  And the corrupt and criminal process behind it is to disarm the populace for the benefit of the abusive government.
[51:56.000 --> 51:58.000]  And that's just reality.
[51:58.000 --> 52:02.000]  But the fact is they cannot do it.
[52:02.000 --> 52:08.000]  They cannot make it illegal to own a gun, period.
[52:08.000 --> 52:11.000]  So how can they make it illegal to own a car?
[52:11.000 --> 52:13.000]  Well, the thing is they haven't.
[52:13.000 --> 52:14.000]  You can own the car.
[52:14.000 --> 52:16.000]  You just can't use it.
[52:16.000 --> 52:18.000]  You can purchase 20 cars.
[52:18.000 --> 52:20.000]  You just can't use any of them.
[52:20.000 --> 52:22.000]  Not until you ask the government for permission.
[52:22.000 --> 52:35.000]  Not until you say, hey, here's my money for my property to use as that property on my road that I specifically pay taxes to you to maintain for me to use.
[52:35.000 --> 52:38.000]  But here's more money on top of that instead.
[52:38.000 --> 52:46.000]  So that now I also need your permission both not only for myself but also for my property.
[52:46.000 --> 52:48.000]  Because remember, you don't have to pay for one license.
[52:48.000 --> 52:50.000]  You have to pay for two.
[52:50.000 --> 52:53.000]  You have to pay for the plates on the car.
[52:53.000 --> 52:54.000]  That's a license.
[52:54.000 --> 52:56.000]  And then you have to pay for the one in your pocket.
[52:56.000 --> 52:58.000]  That's another license.
[52:58.000 --> 53:04.000]  But don't forget, then they get to tax you again by saying, now that you've licensed the property,
[53:04.000 --> 53:10.000]  we get to tell you whether or not it's in the condition we approve of before you can use it.
[53:10.000 --> 53:13.000]  You get it?
[53:13.000 --> 53:20.000]  Do you not see this worm on a hook twisting in front of you, waiting on you to snatch it up?
[53:20.000 --> 53:22.000]  And you did.
[53:22.000 --> 53:27.000]  You bought it hook, line, and sinker that they actually had the authority to do this crap.
[53:27.000 --> 53:29.000]  And they never did.
[53:29.000 --> 53:35.000]  They are saying that even though technology's advancement through time cannot take away a
[53:35.000 --> 53:40.000]  Second Amendment right, technology's advancement through time can definitely take away your right
[53:40.000 --> 53:44.000]  to locomotion and to move about freely without state approval.
[53:44.000 --> 53:46.000]  That's exactly what they've told you.
[53:46.000 --> 53:50.000]  And you bought it.
[53:50.000 --> 53:52.000]  That's what this is telling you.
[53:52.000 --> 53:56.000]  A result feasible of execution is intended.
[53:56.000 --> 53:59.000]  Well, that is not a feasible execution.
[53:59.000 --> 54:04.000]  To deprive the people of their individual right to locomotion and to move freely about the land at
[54:04.000 --> 54:13.000]  their own whim and volition is not a feasible execution of the statute.
[54:13.000 --> 54:19.000]  And as a term of art relating to an occupation, we have proof of that.
[54:19.000 --> 54:23.000]  Number five, public interest is favored over any private interest.
[54:23.000 --> 54:30.000]  Well, public interest does not take precedence over private interest if the interest in private is
[54:30.000 --> 54:32.000]  that of a right.
[54:32.000 --> 54:34.000]  Get it?
[54:34.000 --> 54:41.000]  The only way the public interest can be favored over any private interest is if it is a privilege
[54:41.000 --> 54:45.000]  that the government controls.
[54:45.000 --> 54:49.000]  Use of the roads by the people is not a privilege.
[54:49.000 --> 54:51.000]  It is our right.
[54:51.000 --> 54:52.000]  We own them.
[54:52.000 --> 54:54.000]  The state does not own them.
[54:54.000 --> 54:58.000]  The state is our appointed caretaker.
[54:58.000 --> 55:01.000]  They build them for our benefit and use.
[55:01.000 --> 55:06.000]  They keep them maintained for our benefit and use, not for their own.
[55:06.000 --> 55:10.000]  They don't own them.
[55:10.000 --> 55:19.000]  So why the hell are you paying them for permission to use that which rightfully belongs to you?
[55:19.000 --> 55:26.000]  The only people they can do that to are those that are using the public property for private
[55:26.000 --> 55:33.000]  gain while damaging said public property, which is what these big trucks with all these heavy
[55:33.000 --> 55:37.000]  loads do on a regular basis.
[55:37.000 --> 55:42.000]  They put more wear and tear on the roads than a regular car does.
[55:42.000 --> 55:47.000]  Because of that, they are using it in a privileged fashion.
[55:47.000 --> 55:52.000]  They are using a public resource to generate private profit or gain.
[55:52.000 --> 55:54.000]  You and I are not doing that.
[55:54.000 --> 55:58.000]  We are not conducting a business on the road.
[55:58.000 --> 56:01.000]  We're simply using the road to get from place to place.
[56:01.000 --> 56:05.000]  And our business is on either end of that trip.
[56:05.000 --> 56:11.000]  It is not on the road itself like those using it to transport person's goods or property
[56:11.000 --> 56:16.000]  for money or for some other type of personal gain.
[56:16.000 --> 56:21.000]  You get it?
[56:21.000 --> 56:28.000]  This should not be difficult to understand, but only an attorney or those attorney wannabes
[56:28.000 --> 56:40.000]  or a pure born-to-be statist refuses or cannot see the logic in that argument.
[56:40.000 --> 56:43.000]  It astounds me.
[56:43.000 --> 56:49.000]  It is a mental frickin' disorder to be that blocked in the head that that concept does
[56:49.000 --> 57:03.000]  not sink in and cannot displace your statist fantasy of control over everyone else.
[57:03.000 --> 57:07.000]  But here we are.
[57:07.000 --> 57:11.000]  It's Valentine's Day, and the next card you're getting in the mail is not only a love letter
[57:11.000 --> 57:17.000]  of a citation of some kind or an invitation to pay them more money for a license renewal
[57:17.000 --> 57:20.000]  or a registration renewal, but pretty soon they're going to be sending you a bill for
[57:20.000 --> 57:24.000]  a tax you don't know either in the form of the income tax.
[57:24.000 --> 57:30.000]  And you're going to pay it, most of you.
[57:30.000 --> 57:31.000]  Way to go, America.
[57:31.000 --> 57:34.000]  Yay.
[57:34.000 --> 57:38.000]  Now let's look at the even more important chapter of the Third Court of Appeals,
[57:38.000 --> 57:44.000]  and every other court tends to ignore because of what it does.
[57:44.000 --> 57:50.000]  This chapter shoots holes in every interpretation they try to make the way they make it in order
[57:50.000 --> 57:54.000]  to construe the law in a way that deprives us of our rights.
[57:54.000 --> 57:55.000]  Okay?
[57:55.000 --> 57:59.000]  So when we get back after this top of the hour break, I am going to go into the little
[57:59.000 --> 58:02.000]  bit of chapter 312 and help you understand that.
[58:02.000 --> 58:08.000]  Now, because it is the top of the hour break, I'm going to go ahead and next segment I'm
[58:08.000 --> 58:11.000]  going to turn the phones on after I get done with this little bit that I'm going to cover.
[58:11.000 --> 58:14.000]  I'm not even on page 3 of the document.
[58:14.000 --> 58:16.000]  I'm just now getting to page 3, so there's a lot to go.
[58:16.000 --> 58:20.000]  So I'm going to carry this over the next couple of weeks if I don't get it on the blog before
[58:20.000 --> 58:21.000]  then.
[58:21.000 --> 58:23.000]  But in any case, y'all hang in there, folks.
[58:23.000 --> 58:25.000]  We will be right back after this.
[58:25.000 --> 58:28.000]  I'll start taking your calls in the next segment after I get this last little bit done.
[58:28.000 --> 58:29.000]  Okay?
[58:29.000 --> 58:50.000]  So y'all hold on.
[58:50.000 --> 58:55.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.000 --> 58:58.000]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:04.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.000 --> 59:07.000]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:15.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:15.000 --> 59:18.000]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:23.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.000 --> 59:28.000]  into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:43.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.000 --> 59:47.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.000 --> 59:50.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdowns.
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:12.000]  Markets for Friday the 10th of February 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,233.40 an ounce,
[01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:24.000]  silver $17.94 an ounce, Texas crude $53 a barrel, and Bitcoin sitting at about $1,004 U.S. currency.
[01:00:24.000 --> 01:00:31.000]  Today in history, the year 1996, IBM's Deep Blue supercomputer defeats Russian chess grandmaster,
[01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:35.000]  former world chess champion, writer and political activist considered by many of the greatest chess
[01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  player of all time, Garry Gasparov, in chess for the first time today in history.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:47.000]  In recent news, in an interview with Yahoo News released Friday today,
[01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  Syrian President Bashar Assad stated that the United States is welcome to join the battle against terrorists
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  in Syria so long as it's in cooperation with his government.
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:00:59.000]  Only problem in contention is that Assad's government has labeled all armed opposition,
[01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:02.000]  including U.S.-backed rebel fighters, as terrorists.
[01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:07.000]  Syria has been in turmoil for six years of civil war, which has killed more than 300,000 people
[01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  and displaced half of the country's population.
[01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:14.000]  Coupled with the rise of ISIS, which many suspect to be coordinating with the U.S.-supported rebels,
[01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:20.000]  and their 2014 takeover of about a third of both Syria and Iraq, Assad has had his hands full.
[01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  In fact, the rebels posed a serious threat to Assad for about a year,
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:28.000]  that is until Russia in 2015 joined Syria's war, backing Assad's forces.
[01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:32.000]  Assad emphasized in the interview that sending U.S. troops would not be enough.
[01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  Respecting Syria's sovereignty and building diplomatic trust is crucial.
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  Assad would not comment on Trump's move to indefinitely bar Syrian refugees from entering the U.S.,
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  calling it an issue of American sovereignty.
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:49.000]  He did end up saying that there are definitely terrorists among the millions of Syrian refugees seeking refuge in the West.
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:54.000]  Dr. Orrin Gutfeld, one of the lead archaeologists on Operation Scroll,
[01:01:54.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  a joint effort by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the Israel Antiquities Authority,
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:03.000]  the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, and the civil administration of Judea and Samaria,
[01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  caused an archaeological stir when his team and others found an undiscovered cave
[01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:09.000]  with more artifacts from the Qomran community.
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:14.000]  Famous were the Dead Sea Scrolls, which were uncovered in the area in the 1940s and 50s.
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:17.000]  Everything from pottery shards, broken scroll storage jars and lids,
[01:02:17.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  Neolithic flint tools and arrowheads were scattered at the cave's entrance.
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:25.000]  After the team started picking away, they found an unbroken storage jar with a scroll in it.
[01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:30.000]  The scroll was rushed to Hebrew University's conservation lab where it was analyzed in a protected environment.
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  Unfortunately, it had no writing on it and appears to have been placed in the jar to prepare it for writing.
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:40.000]  Further in, they discovered an intentional cave-in which had a tunnel of about 16 to 20 feet in length
[01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:45.000]  where they found three broken storage jars and lids along with cloth coverings and leather straps
[01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  that bound the scrolls that the team thinks looters ransacked around the 1950s.
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  As of late, researchers believe that the Dead Sea Scroll fragments have made their way onto the antiquity black market.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  This is Rick Brody with your Lowdown for February 10, 2017.
[01:03:00.000 --> 01:03:28.000]  Music
[01:03:28.000 --> 01:03:34.000]  Alright, folks, we are back.
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:39.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio and with your host, Eddie Craig, on the Monday night show.
[01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:43.000]  Now, let's real quick wrap up chapter 312 and then I can start taking your calls.
[01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:46.000]  The phones are on if you wish to get in line.
[01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  So the calling number is 512-646-1984.
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  Alright, now, in section 312.001, we see this.
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:01.000]  Application, that's the title of that section.
[01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:07.000]  This sub-chapter, meaning sub-chapter A, Construction Rules for Civil Statutes,
[01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  this sub-chapter applies to the construction of all civil statutes.
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:15.000]  Got it?
[01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:25.000]  So everything we're dealing with here in sub-chapter A of chapter 312, and chapter 312 itself is titled Construction of Laws, okay?
[01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  It says that what is in 312 applies to all civil statutes.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  A little something the Third Court of Appeals obviously either doesn't know or wishes to hide when it's convenient.
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:43.000]  Section 312.002, Meaning of Words.
[01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  Subsection A, except as provided by subsection B, words shall be given their ordinary meaning.
[01:04:52.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  Remember, ordinary meaning in the context of a statute can only mean ordinary meaning in law.
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  A statute is law.
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:11.000]  It cannot be given a meaning in common English because the law is not written in common English.
[01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:18.000]  Therefore, a common English definition would be out of place in a legal context.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  Follow?
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:33.000]  They have to be meaning ordinary meaning as used in law at some place, sometime, somewhere.
[01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:43.000]  So we go look in the legal dictionary, and only if it's not there do we have any way to go and look at a regular English dictionary.
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:53.000]  But then it would still have to be construed by whatever definition appears in the English dictionary that is best suited for a legal use.
[01:05:53.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  You get it?
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  Subsection B, the most important section in all of chapter 312.
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:03.000]  Here's why.
[01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:17.000]  If a word is connected with and used with reference to a particular trade or subject matter or is used as a word of art,
[01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  the word shall have the meaning given by experts in the particular trade, subject matter, or art.
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:34.000]  Now, in their opinion that I read to you a couple weeks ago,
[01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:39.000]  the Third Court of Appeals, without citing any authority whatsoever,
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  said that the term transportation as used in reference to the transportation code had absolutely no relationship to commercial activity.
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  Based upon what authority, you morons?
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:07.000]  Where did you get the idea that term as a term of art in law with a specific legal definition and a specific industry definition
[01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:21.000]  somehow didn't mean what it normally means in relation to this one code when this section right here says it absolutely cannot be read any other way?
[01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:26.000]  Because right here it says you shall have that meaning assigned to it.
[01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  You have a legal duty to give it the meaning that the experts in that particular trade, subject matter, or art use in relation to that term or phrase.
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:38.000]  You got it?
[01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:52.000]  But no, you people think that you are God, that you, sitting up high on your little throne in your black dresses, can dictate the lives of everyone else
[01:07:52.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  by intentionally corrupting the English language to suit your own desired outcomes.
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  And this statute right here is proof positive. That is exactly what every single one of the three judges that ruled on that opinion did.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:25.000]  This is exactly why if I ever take another appeal to any appellate court, I am going to demand oral argument so that they cannot pull this crap
[01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  and hide behind their sanctimonious misinterpretation, intentional misinterpretation of the terms of art that bind them to a legal context they're not supposed to deviate from,
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  but do anyway if it takes away any power or money that the state was never entitled to have, even if they weren't entitled to have in the first place.
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:55.000]  And that is what they're doing.
[01:08:55.000 --> 01:09:06.000]  Now in my outline, Section 311.011A is neither vague nor ambiguous when it places a legal duty upon all branches of government to read and apply every statute
[01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:15.000]  and every code in its proper context, which in the case of the Texas Transportation Code is the context of transportation
[01:09:15.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  and its legal meaning and usage as a term of art solely to a profession or occupation.
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  But they're not doing that.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:44.000]  The system is broken, but it is not reparable. You understand me? There is no legitimate existing manner to use the system to fix the system.
[01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:57.000]  Too many of these people are in control of too many of the avenues required to get that result. It will never be allowed to reach fruition.
[01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  The complete corruption of the people's rights and way of life to control their government officials for their own safety and benefit is gone
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:24.000]  if the only recourse we have is the system that they have usurped and corrupted into a self-serving, self-enriching way of doing business for themselves.
[01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  They have turned our government into their for-profit personal gain corporation.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  That part the patrons have right. They just don't have it right in what context and how it really works.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  Because the last thing in the world they want is for you to be a part of their corporation because that puts you on the inside and not the outside where they can reach into your pockets so easy.
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  So you're wrong in that understanding. But I guarantee you I'm not wrong in this one. And the information I'm giving you is dead on and very easy to prove.
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:07.000]  So give us all of Valentine. If you know an attorney, hang an attorney. Okay?
[01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:15.000]  All right. That being said, I'm going to go ahead and start taking calls if we have any calls up on the board here.
[01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:23.000]  Yeah, we do. We got a couple. Now, folks, I do not have a call screener tonight. So I'm going to tell you right now on the air before I start picking you up.
[01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:31.000]  If you have a radio playing in the background, turn it off. If you are on a speakerphone, turn it off.
[01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  If you are on a wireless headset, take it off. Talk to me direct, talk to me clear, and let's have a discussion that I'm not having to constantly go, what? What?
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  Okay, let's get this right. All right. That being said, first one up is Trumpet Dave.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  Dave, what can I do for you?
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:55.000]  Oh, yes, Randy.
[01:11:55.000 --> 01:12:00.000]  No, this is not Randy for the second time. This is Eddie.
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:12.000]  Yes, Eddie. In a trial, a jury trial, I'm not going to give details of the case.
[01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:20.000]  But in my apartment complex, it appears they wanted to turn it into student housing.
[01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  So all the old people seem to be getting bizarre charges.
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:46.000]  So, Eddie, I'm suing and the other elderly people in this building, they don't want to, some of them don't want to get involved in my case.
[01:12:46.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  But can I take a statement from them of the bizarre charges that are being directed towards them? And can I read that to the jury?
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:07.000]  No, no, you cannot. It's hearsay.
[01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  You want to take a statement from them and get them to swear to it under oath, that's fine. But they still have to take the chair on the stand in court and testify to what's in that document.
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  You cannot testify about it for them.
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  Okay.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:32.000]  I've been looking at the term interrogative.
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:37.000]  I cannot even interview them. I would have to interview them in court.
[01:13:37.000 --> 01:13:41.000]  No.
[01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:51.000]  An interrogatory is something you send to the other party to get information or to other parties' witnesses to get information about the case one way or the other.
[01:13:51.000 --> 01:13:58.000]  You're talking about witnesses, okay, in which case you have to take depositions.
[01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  But the thing is, even with a deposition, unless the court approves the use of the video rather than them appearing in court to testify, then you have no problem.
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  But that will only be allowed if both parties on each side were present during the deposition and agreed to stipulate to whatever's in that video and let it be admitted at trial.
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:40.000]  Otherwise, same problem exists. They have to be in court. They have to take the stand. They have to swear in. They have to be asked questions and answer them.
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  Okay. Even with the video, you're saying they have to be...
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  Unless the court specifically approves the video in place of sworn testimony, yes. But like I said, the caveat to doing that would be that both sides had to be present during the deposition.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  They would both have to stipulate as to what parts of that deposition could be used at trial without other further testimony, and they would both have to sign off on an agreement to do it that way.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:20.000]  And that's what the judge would allow him without somebody being there to take the stand. But that's an issue you have to raise with the court and the other side to see if they agree to it.
[01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  Okay. Okay. Eddie, this... I had a case in JP court and I lost and I appealed it to county court. If I lose again, can I appeal...
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:47.000]  What state are you in?
[01:15:47.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  The district court.
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:49.000]  What state are you in?
[01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  Texas.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:57.000]  No, you don't go from the county court to the district court. You go from the county court to the district appellate court.
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  Appellate court. Okay. Okay. And I can do that.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  It depends on what the fine assessed against you is in judgment. If the judgment is less than $100, no. $100 or less, no. You can't appeal it.
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:20.000]  If it's more than $100 or you are raising a constitutional challenge as the grounds for the appeal, then you can.
[01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:32.000]  Okay. Eddie, as I'm defending myself, in front of a jury...
[01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  Look, hey, Dave, Dave. Hang on a second. I got a break here. Do me a favor, man. If you're going to call in, give me one or two questions, but don't hog the whole segment.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  I got other people in line behind you and I used up at the show on my beginning. So hang on just a minute. I'm going to answer this last question for you on the other side before I take somebody else, okay?
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  All right.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  All right, folks. We'll be right back after this break. So y'all hang in there.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:10.000]  I love Logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fix. I'd be lost without Logos.
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:22.000]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help Logos?
[01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:31.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos. When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, the first thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  No.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  No.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  No. I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:57.000]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:17:57.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  We are welcome.
[01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:34.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:50.000]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:50.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plan.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:46.000]  You put the beer in my pocket, took the money from my hand.
[01:19:46.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:20:05.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:10.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio and we are talking with Trumpet Dave.
[01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:14.000]  Alright Dave, one last part of your question here. What is it?
[01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  Alright Eddie, so at the end of a jury trial, each side gets to give their final statement or argument, correct?
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:30.000]  It's called closing arguments, yeah.
[01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:43.000]  Okay, now as I do that, I can't be interrupted with objections but my question is...
[01:20:43.000 --> 01:20:54.000]  It depends on what you do. You cannot, on closing statements, you cannot bring up new evidence or information that was not brought up at the evidentiary phase of trial.
[01:20:54.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  You are limited in your summation to what was said and done and proven or not proven at trial. That's it.
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:17.000]  Okay, alright. Can I say that I am going to bring this, my story, my argument to the newspapers?
[01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  How is that relevant to your case and what are you expecting that to accomplish?
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:30.000]  What does the jury care who you take it to? The jury doesn't care if you take it to the nightline.
[01:21:30.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  Well, I am going to do that.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:39.000]  Well, that's still not my question to your question.
[01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:45.000]  Alright. Okay, alright Eddie. I want to thank you very much. Thank you.
[01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:47.000]  You're welcome. Have a good one.
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:54.000]  Alright, now we've got Jimmy in Maryland. Jimmy, what do you got?
[01:21:54.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  Hey, how you doing?
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:21:59.000]  Doing alright. You're on a speaker phone, aren't you?
[01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:03.000]  No, I'm in my car because I'm having bad reception, but no, I'm not on a speaker phone.
[01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:09.000]  Okay. Well, try to clean it up a little bit if you can because you sound like you're talking from the bottom of a can.
[01:22:09.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  Oh, bad reception. I just want to update. I was convicted two times of driving on a suspended license.
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:29.000]  I went and checked it out and it turned out that this is suspended license from face to tear cases of a situation that it wasn't me.
[01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:34.000]  Speaking of identity, somebody that lived in California. So I went and got the case of the Smiths.
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  And I was wondering what can I do as far as, you know, filing a case for a new trial and putting some type of hold on the bodies of evasion here that I got coming up.
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  Well, you mean putting a hold on the convictions that aren't yours?
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:53.000]  No, no, no, no, no. I have a violation of probation hearing coming up.
[01:22:53.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  And, you know, I got documentation that I've got this case dismissing without a license.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:06.000]  You know, the license that I've turned in, you know, doesn't exist. You know, how it was, you know, almost taken identity.
[01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  Right.
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:16.000]  When I talk to the stride improvement people, they say that is something that they still holding that they won't release, you know, for me if I want to give them as I can't get one.
[01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  So I'm trying to find out what else can I do as far as trying to clear up this thing that they have going on here, this hold on the license.
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:42.000]  As far as what they're holding, if the documentation they have shows that your license was not invalid or anything of that nature, then how can they charge you with it?
[01:23:42.000 --> 01:23:55.000]  But now as far as the violation of probation, you're saying that the issue here is that the offenses under that license weren't actually yours, right?
[01:23:55.000 --> 01:23:56.000]  Right.
[01:23:56.000 --> 01:24:07.000]  Does the record anywhere show that someone else incurred those offenses under your license number?
[01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:13.000]  Unfortunately, it doesn't, but like I said, I've got them dismissed, and you know what?
[01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  Okay.
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:16.000]  Then all you should have is the dismissal order.
[01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:20.000]  The dismissal order is enough to show that the charges were not valid.
[01:24:20.000 --> 01:24:31.000]  They can't put you on probation for a conviction that is increased because of a conviction that's been overturned.
[01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  Okay.
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:35.000]  Or was invalid to begin with.
[01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:42.000]  They can't enhance your punishment on an action that was never supposed to be there.
[01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  Right.
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:47.000]  So yeah, you can challenge it and have that part of it overturned.
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  Okay, so what do I file for a new trial?
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  I'm trying to figure out exactly what to why I do.
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  You can petition the original court for a jurisdictional challenge to reopen the case.
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  You can file a petition asking for a rehearing in the case under new evidence rule and so on and so forth, whatever.
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  Okay.
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  Now, as far as this driving improvement thing, they actually, I turned the license under 98, and it said like in 2001, that's where this whole thing comes from.
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  But the license does not exist, so they really have no authority to do anything.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  But you know, it's like you say, they react, what's called retroact a license, which is, you know, a crime.
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  Yeah.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  Well, again, like I said, the only thing that you can do that I'm aware of that you can do anyway that should work is to file for a motion for rehearing or reconsideration of the case and reopen it for lack of jurisdiction in the first instance.
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:25:56.000]  Okay.
[01:25:56.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  And try to get that, get any enhancements to whatever the probation charge against you was that they're now trying to charge you with violating.
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  If that, if you could only be on probation because it was a jailable offense, and it's only a jailable offense because of an enhancement due to a prior conviction, and that prior conviction has been declared void, then the enhancement is a problem, right?
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  Right.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:24.000]  So that's what you're addressing.
[01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  Okay, so I'll work on getting that done because they're trying to get me to get a license. I'm not trying to contract and go back into this thing again.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:37.000]  Yeah.
[01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  Okay. Thank you, Eddie. I'll be in touch. Appreciate it.
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:42.000]  All right, man.
[01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  All right.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  Bye.
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  All right. Now we are going to go to Alden in Texas. Alden, what can we do for you?
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  Wrong one here. Hang on, guys.
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  I'm sorry. Say again.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  Can you hear me?
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:26:59.000]  I can hear you.
[01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:01.000]  Okay.
[01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  I actually don't necessarily have a question. I want to talk about your seminar and the materials that come with it.
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  Okay.
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  Because before I purchased it, I was under the impression it was one thing when once I got it, it blew my mind. And you deserve credit for all the time and energy that you took to pull all this information together.
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  And it's awesome. There's so many documents on this. I'm still not even done printing them out.
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  It's the code. It even tells you how to read bills. It goes through all the basics. And it's literally like dummy proof.
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  One would hope so. Basically, I had two months to write a paperback law school. That's all I had to write the book. And that's what you got.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  And the amount of information that's in that book was put together in two months on the fly to make it a portable law school, basically.
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  And then the documents I've been creating over time as I've gone. But for the most part, I sat down for two and a half more months after that and wrote every one of those documents that you have in there from scratch, all 400-plus of them.
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  Wow.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  You can very much tell that you've taken a lot of time and effort into putting all this information together.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  And I appreciate it very much. I know a lot of other people do. And if you haven't gotten the seminar material, you really need to do it.
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  $250 is a steal for everything that's in here. I was hesitant. I said $250 is a lot for a class seminar book.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  But if you actually look at the materials, you look at what you're given into the package of materials, it far outweighs that $250.
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  Like, it's a steal and everybody should go grab it. Like, this is a great tool.
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  It even has like the affidavits and the complaints and all the different examples that you need to go through the process of court.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  And like, it's great. You did a great job, Eddie. And I'm looking really forward to continuing on it.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:17.000]  Well, I appreciate that. Thanks for calling in and letting everybody know.
[01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  All right. Thank you.
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:20.000]  Have a good one.
[01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:29.000]  You too. No, folks, that is not a paid advertisement. I didn't do that. He got it. He likes it. So more power to him. I'm glad.
[01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  All right. Now we have Dave in Delaware. Dave, what can I do for you? Never mind, Dave. Hang on just a minute.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  I got a break coming up here. I'll pick you up on the other side. So hang on.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  Folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. We have two more segments and we will try to get as much done as we can in those two when it comes to answering your phone calls.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:56.000]  So y'all hang in there. Give us a call. 512-646-1984. And I will do my best in the time remaining to get to everybody that comes up on the board.
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:30:02.000]  Y'all hang in there. We'll be right back.
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  Let's get physical, physical. Hey, if you exercise even a tenth as much as you should, you can extend your life by years.
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll hike right back with the good news in just a moment.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:34.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  Exercise. We all know we need it, but we don't always take the time to do it. Now new evidence says just 15 measly minutes of physical activity a day can extend your life a lot.
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  Researchers in Taiwan found that an hour and a half of exercise a week extended people's lives by three whole years. That's just 13 minutes a day.
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  The study found that small amounts of daily exercise made people 10% less likely to die of cancer and 14% less likely to die for any reason.
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:20.000]  So come on couch potatoes, dig out those Olivia Newton John CDs and let me hear your body talk.
[01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  I lost my son. My nephew. My uncle. My son. On September 11th, 2001. Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:47.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane. Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org. Why it fell, why it matters and what you can do.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:16.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. That's why you have insurance.
[01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  And Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:12.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  Yeah, who you want to chip? Could you take me for free, Toli? Who you want to chip? Me no free, Toli. You can't chip me. Oh, Moussa.
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984, and we have Dave in Delaware.
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  Dave, what can I do for you?
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  The website escape-tickets-capital-i-capital-r-capital-s-court.org, the email has been corrected. The old email, the DMV, has been disconnected because they're no longer hosting any emails at all.
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:29.000]  So the new email for people who want to discuss anything about that website is notaxman00 at gmail.com.
[01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  Okay.
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  Please spread that around.
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  All right, I'll do what I can do. Anything else?
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  No, it's just it happened on February 2nd. We didn't have much time, but anyway.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  All right.
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  Best way to get the word out is no longer DMV. It's now notaxman00 at gmail.com. Thank you very much.
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  You're welcome. Bye-bye.
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  All right, now we have Eric in California. Eric, what can we do for you?
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  Hello, Eric in California.
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  Can you hear me okay?
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  I can now.
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  All right, great. All right, so I've got a toll road. I'll take it in the mail, I guess.
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:20.000]  It's accusing me of not paying it because I don't have a Fast Track device on my car.
[01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:25.000]  It's a way for $6 and change, but I've been listening to you for a little while.
[01:35:25.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  I want to see if I can practice my skills at fighting this.
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  Okay.
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:32.000]  And was wondering.
[01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:38.000]  How much studying have you done over who has authority over the toll road,
[01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  who built the toll road, and who paid for the toll road?
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  So I really quickly just looked at it. It's a private – they say they're a state company.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  It's privately funded through bonds.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  There is no such thing as privately funded through bonds if those bonds are being sold to the public
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  or to any public entity that's a governmental entity.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  There is no private.
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:16.000]  That money's coming from the pockets of the people in some form or fashion into the pockets of the private company.
[01:36:16.000 --> 01:36:19.000]  If public funds go to build that road, it's a public road.
[01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:22.000]  I don't give a crap what anybody tries to tell you.
[01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:28.000]  If they use the public's money to build it, the public has right to access.
[01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  Now they don't want you to believe that, but you are in California.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:37.000]  And in California, the reason I'm asking you these questions is this.
[01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  If the toll road requirement to pay is found in the same code that regulates motor vehicles,
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  then you have a clear-cut set of statutes that makes it very plain
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  they cannot charge a member of the public for using the toll road
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  because the toll will apply only to a motor vehicle,
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:12.000]  which is defined in California statute as one engaged for commercial purposes.
[01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:13.000]  I was reading the website.
[01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:18.000]  I did find something that basically goes along with what you just said.
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  It was contradicting themselves on their own website about who funded it.
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  On one line it says it's not supported by the state of California.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:31.000]  On the other line it says it is backed by the state of California,
[01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:34.000]  and I thought that was kind of odd.
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:35.000]  Right.
[01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:41.000]  And where does the state of California get its money?
[01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  From us.
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  Ding, ding, ding.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:45.000]  We have a winner.
[01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:48.000]  Us being the public, right?
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:49.000]  That's correct.
[01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:51.000]  There you go.
[01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  Okay.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:56.000]  If there's anything, what should I put into my response to...
[01:37:56.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  Well, now, I don't do paperwork on the radio show, dude.
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:03.000]  I'd have to sit down and see everything I just told you to go find,
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  I would have to sit down and start looking at.
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  And I just ain't got the time to do that research for you.
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:10.000]  Okay.
[01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:11.000]  I'll get reading.
[01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  All right.
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:13.000]  Good luck.
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:14.000]  All right.
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:15.000]  Thank you.
[01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:16.000]  You're welcome.
[01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  All right.
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:20.000]  Now we're going to go to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:38:20.000 --> 01:38:22.000]  Olivier, what do you got?
[01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:23.000]  How you doing?
[01:38:23.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  Hey.
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  In response to what that gentleman just said, I had a problem.
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:29.000]  Well, not a problem.
[01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  Ever since I started listening to you, I went to renegade.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  I ain't paid nothing.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:37.000]  Everything that I was free from doing, I did.
[01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  So once I started getting those toll slips for me to pay,
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  started getting them, I ignored them.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  Started getting some more.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:47.000]  My wife started getting aggravated.
[01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  She started nagging me.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  So I said, okay, okay, give me the phone.
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:52.000]  I grabbed the phone.
[01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  I called the toll company.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  I mean, I called the toll company up, and I told them, hey,
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:38:59.000]  I need to speak to your supervisor.
[01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:01.000]  They're like, well, they're not available.
[01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  I'm like, well, I'm going to need you to get this message across to them.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:10.000]  Tell them that if I get another letter to my house for this toll roll that
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  they're accusing me of having to pay when I'm not in commerce,
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:17.000]  I'm going to send them a legal notice.
[01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:21.000]  And by the time they finish reading that legal notice and having to answer,
[01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  they're going to be certified attorneys.
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  I said, if I get another, so I need you to contact them and tell whoever
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  your manager that if I get another letter sent to my house,
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  that I will send a legal notice to your company.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:40.000]  And once I send that legal notice, I will pursue all actions after that.
[01:39:40.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  You're like, well, one second, Mr. Olivier, let me go get you.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:46.000]  Let me go find somebody for you.
[01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:49.000]  Yeah, let me go find a supervisor that ain't available that I'm now suddenly
[01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  going to make available.
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  Yeah, he went and talked about it.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  He came back 10 minutes later.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:59.000]  They're like, Mr. Olivier, let me take your information.
[01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:02.000]  I'm going to forward all your information to the manager,
[01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:06.000]  and they'll be contacting you back.
[01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  I said, okay, fine, no problem.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  They gave my information.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:13.000]  What about my business?
[01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  No letters for the next two weeks.
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:18.000]  Two weeks and a half, almost three weeks.
[01:40:18.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  My wife came inside.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  She's like, they sent you another letter, so I'm all hot, man.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:22.000]  Another one?
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  Oh, man, okay.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  I'm like, okay, give me the computer.
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:28.000]  Give me my pencil and paper.
[01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  Let me go do my study and start to write this legal notice stuff.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  You know, so I'm getting real hot.
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  I'm like, they just think I'm playing.
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  I'm getting hot and going around, and my wife is reading the letter.
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  I'm not even paying attention to the letter.
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  She's reading the letter.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:42.000]  She's like, hold on, wait, wait.
[01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:43.000]  Wait.
[01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:44.000]  I'm like, what's wrong?
[01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:46.000]  I'm like, wait, there's something wrong with this letter.
[01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  I said, what?
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  He said that we are sorry for the inconvenience, and we're going to remove all tickets because
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  I was traveling back and forth to Florida to see my mom at that time.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:06.000]  And he said that they're going to clear all records of my information from their system,
[01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  and they're sorry for the inconvenience, and hope that this corrects this situation.
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:21.000]  Once they get confronted that they're committing fraud and they know that you understand that,
[01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:25.000]  especially when they're not governmental.
[01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:29.000]  Now, the government thinks they can do whatever it wants, but of course, if you do it right,
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:32.000]  you can show them that ain't true either.
[01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:36.000]  But these private companies that are drawing profit from this that have to defend what
[01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:42.000]  they do and can't just wipe it away like the government entities can, big difference.
[01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  Congratulations.
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:44.000]  Right.
[01:41:44.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  All right.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  The next thing is I got arrested last week or the week before last, twice in the same
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:51.000]  day.
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:52.000]  It's so hilarious.
[01:41:52.000 --> 01:41:53.000]  There's a guy over down the street.
[01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  He saw me in my yellow car.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:55.000]  You know, I got a bright yellow tax.
[01:41:55.000 --> 01:41:56.000]  I'm the only one in this state with that car.
[01:41:56.000 --> 01:41:57.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:57.000 --> 01:41:58.000]  You know me.
[01:41:58.000 --> 01:41:59.000]  So he stopped pulling me over.
[01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:00.000]  I'm like, well, I'm going to go to my son's house.
[01:42:00.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  I'm like, I'm not stopping.
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  So I get there.
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:03.000]  So I get to my son's house.
[01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:08.000]  I get out of the car, act like I'm about to walk in, ignoring him.
[01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:13.000]  They're like, oh, you're under arrest.
[01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:14.000]  I'm like, what the hell are y'all talking about?
[01:42:14.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  He's like, well, you're under arrest for suspending the license.
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  I said, OK, fine.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:17.000]  Let's go.
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:18.000]  They'll go idiots.
[01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:19.000]  So they put me in handcuffs.
[01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  And they searched my car.
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  And they found my ID, which I normally don't hand over.
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:22.000]  Found my license.
[01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  Put me in the car.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  A lieutenant or sergeant came.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  And that sergeant knows that I'm just filing suits on him.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:26.000]  When he pulled up, he saw that.
[01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:39.000]  He saw me in the car.
[01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  He started staring at the other cops and shaking his head.
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:44.000]  Like, what are you guys doing?
[01:42:44.000 --> 01:42:45.000]  Like, no.
[01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  Y'all got the wrong one.
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  So then they came to the car, pulled me out of the car, took their handcuffs off me.
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:54.000]  I'm like, what are y'all doing?
[01:42:54.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  They're like, well, your license is valid.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  So we go.
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:00.000]  I'm like, what?
[01:43:00.000 --> 01:43:01.000]  I'm like, you're releasing me?
[01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  I'm already arrested.
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:03.000]  They're going to jail.
[01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:04.000]  They're like, well, I called the police.
[01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:05.000]  I called the police.
[01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:06.000]  They wanted to file a false imprisonment and arrest me.
[01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  Because you pulled me over, arrested me for no reason, all this stuff.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:10.000]  And they were like, well, to put the 911 sent me to the police station so I could get
[01:43:10.000 --> 01:43:11.000]  sent to me.
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  Then they pulled me over, arrested me for no reason, all this stuff.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  And they were like, well, to put the 911 sent me to the police station so I could get sent
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  to me.
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:25.000]  Then that officer accused him.
[01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:26.000]  He's big in a sense.
[01:43:26.000 --> 01:43:27.000]  He said, well, do you want a warrant for your arrest?
[01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  I'm like, a warrant for what?
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:29.000]  I'm like, are you out of your mind?
[01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  They're like, well, yeah, the officer said that you were driving without a license, so
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  we're going to put a warrant out for your arrest.
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:32.000]  I'm like, do whatever you want.
[01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:33.000]  So the music's coming out.
[01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  Yeah.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  False warrant.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  He's going to do more than anything else.
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:37.000]  All right, man.
[01:43:37.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  Hang on.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  I'll finish up with you on the other side.
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:40.000]  Okay?
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:44:01.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang in there.
[01:44:01.000 --> 01:44:03.000]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:44:03.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:10.000]  needs.
[01:44:10.000 --> 01:44:11.000]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it
[01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  needs.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Did you know the US government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:17.280]  and classified it as a schedule one drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:44:17.280 --> 01:44:31.720]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years and many still don't know
[01:44:31.720 --> 01:44:36.160]  world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that Hemp Protein Powder
[01:44:36.160 --> 01:44:39.520]  is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.520 --> 01:44:45.640]  Remember, Hemp Protein Powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory,
[01:44:45.640 --> 01:44:48.280]  non-GMO and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.280 --> 01:44:57.280]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you,
[01:44:57.280 --> 01:45:01.840]  only at hempusa.org.
[01:45:01.840 --> 01:45:04.960]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.960 --> 01:45:11.800]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[01:45:11.800 --> 01:45:15.480]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.480 --> 01:45:19.560]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.560 --> 01:45:23.800]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.800 --> 01:45:28.680]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.680 --> 01:45:35.200]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:35.200 --> 01:45:39.920]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:39.920 --> 01:45:44.200]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.200 --> 01:45:50.360]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:50.360 --> 01:45:57.120]  pro se tactics and much more, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:57.120 --> 01:46:00.120]  or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:00.120 --> 01:46:26.080]  This is a production of the U.S. Department of Justice.
[01:46:31.120 --> 01:46:36.760]  Alright folks, we are back in the last segment of the rule of law, Monday night show with
[01:46:36.760 --> 01:46:40.920]  your host Eddie Craig, and we are talking with Olivier in Tennessee, if I can get this
[01:46:40.920 --> 01:46:42.920]  mouse to behave and go where I want it to.
[01:46:42.920 --> 01:46:43.920]  Alright Olivier, go ahead.
[01:46:43.920 --> 01:46:53.040]  Alright, so now, they get a warm smart rest, and they picked me up off the road the same
[01:46:53.040 --> 01:46:54.040]  night.
[01:46:54.040 --> 01:46:58.840]  I was coming home from a gas station, they saw a car, they followed me, hit the light.
[01:46:58.840 --> 01:47:01.760]  I gave them another two mile stretch.
[01:47:01.760 --> 01:47:09.120]  I don't stop a car, I get where I'm going now, but I don't accelerate, like you said,
[01:47:09.120 --> 01:47:16.600]  I drive normally, you know what I'm saying, I put stop signs, turn signals and all that.
[01:47:16.600 --> 01:47:23.800]  So, I got in jail, went through the process, they revoked my bond, charged me like $23,000
[01:47:23.800 --> 01:47:30.000]  or $48,000 bond, something like that, and then came down to it, went to court, right?
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:37.200]  Got out, went to court, they got me in court on January 7th, on February 7th, went to the
[01:47:37.200 --> 01:47:43.360]  court, I had an attorney and everything, I didn't want to present my license, but my
[01:47:43.360 --> 01:47:48.160]  attorney was like, you know, hey, you got it, you are well, so I said, okay, whatever.
[01:47:48.160 --> 01:47:53.160]  So, the judge, they ran my license, my license came back valid, right?
[01:47:53.160 --> 01:48:00.800]  So, now I'm about, my license came back valid, and the judge, the judge said, okay, well,
[01:48:00.800 --> 01:48:07.840]  I'm going to dismiss this charge, but I'm going to charge you fine and fee for not having
[01:48:07.840 --> 01:48:08.840]  a license.
[01:48:08.840 --> 01:48:13.360]  I'm like, I'm looking at him like, what the heck are you talking about?
[01:48:13.360 --> 01:48:20.360]  But well, I don't have a valid Tennessee driver's license, and I've been living in Tennessee
[01:48:20.360 --> 01:48:26.000]  for a while, and I should have, and Tennessee requires me to have a Tennessee driver's license,
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:27.800]  so he's going to fine me and fee.
[01:48:27.800 --> 01:48:30.800]  I looked at my attorney, I was like, trial.
[01:48:30.800 --> 01:48:39.600]  I looked at my attorney, I was like, trial, and the judge just put his head down, like,
[01:48:39.600 --> 01:48:44.320]  oh, man, he ain't go for it, like, you know, like, he was so, the boy that, I just looked
[01:48:44.320 --> 01:48:48.160]  at him, I like, bounded over, I asked him, what you going to do, he was like, it's just
[01:48:48.160 --> 01:48:53.720]  bounded over, like, it sounds good to be bounded over, because the judge admitted that my license
[01:48:53.720 --> 01:48:54.720]  is valid.
[01:48:54.720 --> 01:48:55.720]  Yeah?
[01:48:55.720 --> 01:49:04.400]  And now he wants to make something that's valid into a crime, how corrupt can you get?
[01:49:04.400 --> 01:49:12.960]  So now, I got like 10 different cases in this court right now, which suspends license, where
[01:49:12.960 --> 01:49:17.680]  they arrested me and took me to jail for driving a suspended license, and my license has been
[01:49:17.680 --> 01:49:21.520]  valid ever since the first- Yeah, but see, right now, you have a court
[01:49:21.520 --> 01:49:27.480]  order in your possession that says that that license has been valid all along.
[01:49:27.480 --> 01:49:29.040]  Now guess what you've got?
[01:49:29.040 --> 01:49:34.400]  You've got malicious prosecution evidence in your hand for every single case they've
[01:49:34.400 --> 01:49:41.440]  got against you.
[01:49:41.440 --> 01:49:44.200]  So I need to go get that court record.
[01:49:44.200 --> 01:49:48.920]  You need a copy of the signed order that the charges were dismissed, and that the judge
[01:49:48.920 --> 01:49:55.520]  makes sure to append a note to that order, that the license came back valid, and has
[01:49:55.520 --> 01:49:58.760]  shown valid ever since such and such date.
[01:49:58.760 --> 01:50:03.480]  No, it got dismissed yet, because I bounded up to the-
[01:50:03.480 --> 01:50:06.320]  No, no, no, you bound up the other charge.
[01:50:06.320 --> 01:50:10.000]  He dismissed the charge of invalid license.
[01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  Did he not?
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:12.000]  No, he didn't.
[01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:13.000]  Or I'm sorry, suspended license.
[01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:14.400]  No, no, he didn't.
[01:50:14.400 --> 01:50:15.400]  He did not.
[01:50:15.400 --> 01:50:16.400]  Oh, so he lied.
[01:50:16.400 --> 01:50:21.680]  He said he was going to dismiss this one, and then he wanted you to pay for this one?
[01:50:21.680 --> 01:50:22.680]  He changed his mind?
[01:50:22.680 --> 01:50:23.680]  No, it was on one charge.
[01:50:23.680 --> 01:50:32.640]  He said he was going to dismiss the suspended license charge, but made me pay a $25 fee
[01:50:32.640 --> 01:50:35.600]  for not having a license on me.
[01:50:35.600 --> 01:50:38.560]  And that's crazy, because I had a license on me.
[01:50:38.560 --> 01:50:39.560]  Yeah.
[01:50:39.560 --> 01:50:40.560]  Right.
[01:50:40.560 --> 01:50:46.160]  So he didn't, so by me saying no, not agreeing to it-
[01:50:46.160 --> 01:50:47.160]  Oh, okay.
[01:50:47.160 --> 01:50:48.160]  I'm sorry.
[01:50:48.160 --> 01:50:52.160]  I thought you said he was dismissing one charge and hitting you with a different one.
[01:50:52.160 --> 01:50:53.160]  No.
[01:50:53.160 --> 01:51:01.880]  No, he was trying to dismiss the charge and charge me fees to agree to pay a fee for not
[01:51:01.880 --> 01:51:05.040]  having a license, which I did have it on me in the first place.
[01:51:05.040 --> 01:51:06.040]  I just didn't give it to him.
[01:51:06.040 --> 01:51:07.040]  Yeah.
[01:51:07.040 --> 01:51:10.040]  And plus, I'm in low commotion and all that other good stuff.
[01:51:10.040 --> 01:51:11.040]  Right.
[01:51:11.040 --> 01:51:12.040]  Okay.
[01:51:12.040 --> 01:51:19.600]  So my question is, is producing that license in court to them going to hurt my lawsuit
[01:51:19.600 --> 01:51:27.640]  or is it going to hurt my argument that I was in low commotion at the time?
[01:51:27.640 --> 01:51:31.840]  Well, it really depends on how you use it.
[01:51:31.840 --> 01:51:39.640]  The theory is it will, but the argument is that I don't know why that could not be negated.
[01:51:39.640 --> 01:51:45.320]  They're charging you with an invalid license, yet the license is valid.
[01:51:45.320 --> 01:51:51.080]  No one's charging you for using the license.
[01:51:51.080 --> 01:51:53.680]  They're all charging you for not having a valid one.
[01:51:53.680 --> 01:51:54.680]  Right?
[01:51:54.680 --> 01:51:57.680]  They're charging me for not having a valid Tennessee license.
[01:51:57.680 --> 01:51:59.280]  I never had a Tennessee license.
[01:51:59.280 --> 01:52:00.280]  Right.
[01:52:00.280 --> 01:52:01.280]  I have a Virginia license.
[01:52:01.280 --> 01:52:02.280]  Right.
[01:52:02.280 --> 01:52:06.680]  But you can't invalidate a Virginia license that you never had.
[01:52:06.680 --> 01:52:07.680]  Right.
[01:52:07.680 --> 01:52:12.400]  But they said that my Tennessee license was suspended.
[01:52:12.400 --> 01:52:14.480]  They're charging me with a Tennessee.
[01:52:14.480 --> 01:52:15.480]  Right.
[01:52:15.480 --> 01:52:18.480]  But it's not suspended.
[01:52:18.480 --> 01:52:20.080]  I don't have one.
[01:52:20.080 --> 01:52:21.080]  Exactly.
[01:52:21.080 --> 01:52:22.080]  That's what I'm saying.
[01:52:22.080 --> 01:52:30.280]  You cannot suspend a license that doesn't exist any more than you can invalidate a license
[01:52:30.280 --> 01:52:32.280]  that doesn't exist.
[01:52:32.280 --> 01:52:34.880]  You get my point?
[01:52:34.880 --> 01:52:36.880]  Yeah, I do.
[01:52:36.880 --> 01:52:38.160]  So is it?
[01:52:38.160 --> 01:52:44.000]  So producing a license from a different state doesn't alter that fact for those charges
[01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:47.280]  in any way, does it?
[01:52:47.280 --> 01:52:50.320]  Because they're not charging you with having an invalid license in a different state.
[01:52:50.320 --> 01:52:52.680]  They're charging you for not having one in Tennessee.
[01:52:52.680 --> 01:52:53.680]  Right.
[01:52:53.680 --> 01:52:56.680]  So would you produce that?
[01:52:56.680 --> 01:53:01.040]  Would you produce it to let them get that attorney so that he could get the charge dismissed
[01:53:01.040 --> 01:53:02.600]  because I have a valid license?
[01:53:02.600 --> 01:53:07.560]  No, I would still not produce it because they can't charge me with having an invalid Tennessee
[01:53:07.560 --> 01:53:11.240]  license if I never had one to invalidate.
[01:53:11.240 --> 01:53:12.240]  Okay.
[01:53:12.240 --> 01:53:18.000]  So tell him that I don't want to, I'll use a producer.
[01:53:18.000 --> 01:53:22.240]  How well have you looked at that statute as to what the elements are?
[01:53:22.240 --> 01:53:25.640]  Of driving?
[01:53:25.640 --> 01:53:26.920]  Of the invalid license.
[01:53:26.920 --> 01:53:29.920]  On suspended and revoked?
[01:53:29.920 --> 01:53:30.920]  Yeah.
[01:53:30.920 --> 01:53:31.920]  I'm ready.
[01:53:31.920 --> 01:53:32.920]  You ready?
[01:53:32.920 --> 01:53:33.920]  Okay.
[01:53:33.920 --> 01:53:35.440]  What is the code it's in?
[01:53:35.440 --> 01:53:40.360]  Is it a motor vehicle code or transportation code?
[01:53:40.360 --> 01:53:41.360]  Motor vehicle.
[01:53:41.360 --> 01:53:42.360]  Okay.
[01:53:42.360 --> 01:53:46.400]  And have you looked to see whether or not there's a specific definition of transportation
[01:53:46.400 --> 01:53:49.960]  or a definition that shows motor vehicle is commercial?
[01:53:49.960 --> 01:53:52.160]  Yeah, it's commercial.
[01:53:52.160 --> 01:53:53.160]  Yeah.
[01:53:53.160 --> 01:53:55.600]  But is there a definition that makes that irrefutable?
[01:53:55.600 --> 01:54:03.880]  It's something like, yeah, where it says that it's for transportation or for hire.
[01:54:03.880 --> 01:54:04.880]  Yeah.
[01:54:04.880 --> 01:54:05.880]  Okay.
[01:54:05.880 --> 01:54:07.160]  And that's all you got to have.
[01:54:07.160 --> 01:54:14.720]  You have the definitive type of affirmative defense.
[01:54:14.720 --> 01:54:17.760]  That is an absolute affirmative defense.
[01:54:17.760 --> 01:54:26.360]  You must prove that I was using a motor vehicle for commercial use as required by the statute
[01:54:26.360 --> 01:54:31.620]  in order to prove that I am required to have a license to do so.
[01:54:31.620 --> 01:54:37.060]  If you cannot connect those dots, then I have an affirmative defense against the allegation
[01:54:37.060 --> 01:54:39.800]  of an invalid license.
[01:54:39.800 --> 01:54:45.320]  Remember, that's the context to which it applies.
[01:54:45.320 --> 01:54:47.720]  Use of a motor vehicle for commercial purposes.
[01:54:47.720 --> 01:54:48.720]  That's the context.
[01:54:48.720 --> 01:54:49.720]  Okay.
[01:54:49.720 --> 01:54:50.720]  Yeah.
[01:54:50.720 --> 01:54:51.720]  Yeah.
[01:54:51.720 --> 01:54:52.720]  I understand that.
[01:54:52.720 --> 01:54:53.720]  Okay.
[01:54:53.720 --> 01:54:54.720]  I'm with that argument.
[01:54:54.720 --> 01:54:55.720]  All right.
[01:54:55.720 --> 01:54:56.720]  I'm with that argument.
[01:54:56.720 --> 01:55:03.320]  But would I still be able to sue if- Yes, you should be able to sue, because like
[01:55:03.320 --> 01:55:10.160]  I said, they're charging you with a charge that is itself completely invalid.
[01:55:10.160 --> 01:55:13.000]  They have no evidence to support the charge.
[01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:14.000]  None.
[01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:19.680]  Okay, so what I need to decide right now is do I want to go to FastTrack and get this
[01:55:19.680 --> 01:55:25.160]  case out, or do I want to put my name in the book as having done something in the appeal
[01:55:25.160 --> 01:55:29.280]  court, getting something on the record for local motion and our ability to-
[01:55:29.280 --> 01:55:30.280]  Right.
[01:55:30.280 --> 01:55:31.280]  Yeah.
[01:55:31.280 --> 01:55:36.640]  You could be hurting yourself by giving in to one to get on with the others, but without
[01:55:36.640 --> 01:55:40.080]  knowing everything in advance about what's going on, it would be hard to say for sure
[01:55:40.080 --> 01:55:41.080]  from where I'm sitting.
[01:55:41.080 --> 01:55:42.080]  Okay.
[01:55:42.080 --> 01:55:47.640]  I'm going to stick with going to the appeal court, because I'd rather have some case law
[01:55:47.640 --> 01:55:49.680]  with my name on it than another one.
[01:55:49.680 --> 01:55:50.680]  All right.
[01:55:50.680 --> 01:55:55.040]  I didn't find some more stuff, too, on Tennessee, the appeal court.
[01:55:55.040 --> 01:56:03.440]  They turned, last year, 2016, four cases got turned over in 35 days.
[01:56:03.440 --> 01:56:08.240]  During those cases, there were some prosecutorial errors.
[01:56:08.240 --> 01:56:09.240]  Yeah.
[01:56:09.240 --> 01:56:17.240]  And then, right, to testify, tolerance levels for a full prosecutor exceeds the bounds of
[01:56:17.240 --> 01:56:19.880]  propriety, racial prejudice.
[01:56:19.880 --> 01:56:26.880]  They turned one case over, because at the end of the argument, the prosecutor referenced
[01:56:26.880 --> 01:56:32.240]  the rap lyrics, which is in reference to the-
[01:56:32.240 --> 01:56:33.240]  Right.
[01:56:33.240 --> 01:56:36.240]  He made a racial slur in a written motion.
[01:56:36.240 --> 01:56:37.240]  Right.
[01:56:37.240 --> 01:56:44.040]  Or, at least, I should say, racial inference, if not an actual slur, but either way.
[01:56:44.040 --> 01:56:46.360]  Yeah, racial prejudices.
[01:56:46.360 --> 01:56:50.680]  So they dismissed, they overturned the case back.
[01:56:50.680 --> 01:56:54.240]  And this is the same circuit that my cases are going through.
[01:56:54.240 --> 01:57:00.600]  These are the same judges, same circuit, and I read an article showing how these courts
[01:57:00.600 --> 01:57:10.560]  are being more stringent on their rulings, and that's why, so all these, and the prosecutors
[01:57:10.560 --> 01:57:11.560]  got fired.
[01:57:11.560 --> 01:57:12.560]  Good.
[01:57:12.560 --> 01:57:21.680]  Four prosecutors in Davidson County, which is right next to my county, they got fired
[01:57:21.680 --> 01:57:27.040]  for these four cases.
[01:57:27.040 --> 01:57:34.040]  So now, I got 10 cases, and a whole bunch of violations, same violations, a whole bunch
[01:57:34.040 --> 01:57:36.000]  of clearly in my cases.
[01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:40.560]  So I think it's better for me to push that envelope towards my appeals court.
[01:57:40.560 --> 01:57:41.560]  Yeah, my beat.
[01:57:41.560 --> 01:57:44.560]  Yeah, so now, there'll be some more trouble.
[01:57:44.560 --> 01:57:46.560]  All right, man.
[01:57:46.560 --> 01:57:47.560]  All right.
[01:57:47.560 --> 01:57:51.560]  Well, folks, I'm sorry, I didn't manage to get to everybody.
[01:57:51.560 --> 01:57:53.560]  Olivier, thanks for calling in.
[01:57:53.560 --> 01:57:58.560]  Brett, Ruth Rader, if you got something you need to let me know, please email me, Eddie,
[01:57:58.560 --> 01:58:04.760]  E-D-D-I-E, at ruleoflawradio, and I will give you as best I can, as quick as I can.
[01:58:04.760 --> 01:58:09.120]  I am kind of under the gun on some pleadings I'm trying to get done, so it may be a little
[01:58:09.120 --> 01:58:11.520]  while before I reply back.
[01:58:11.520 --> 01:58:14.160]  Put emergency in there if you need to do it right away.
[01:58:14.160 --> 01:58:16.960]  Anyway, folks, I want to thank you all for listening.
[01:58:16.960 --> 01:58:21.360]  I want to thank you all for the fundraiser support and the personal donation support.
[01:58:21.360 --> 01:58:26.280]  Please, if you can, keep us in your financial prayers and wellbeing any time you are able,
[01:58:26.280 --> 01:58:31.160]  especially if we save you money by what we do for you and the information we share.
[01:58:31.160 --> 01:58:34.640]  All right, folks, y'all have a great week.
[01:58:34.640 --> 01:58:35.640]  Take care.
[01:58:35.640 --> 01:58:50.560]  Good night, and God bless.
[01:58:50.560 --> 01:59:20.320]  Bye-bye.
[01:59:21.200 --> 01:59:27.040]  Transcription is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts
[01:59:27.040 --> 01:59:30.520]  and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.520 --> 01:59:33.080]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.080 --> 01:59:40.980]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.980 --> 01:59:51.600]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.600 --> 01:59:52.600]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.600 --> 01:59:54.600]  You found it.
[01:59:54.600 --> 02:00:14.600]  Go to www.bosradionetwork.com.