[00:00.000 --> 00:05.320]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:05.320 --> 00:12.080]  Markets for Friday, February 3, 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,220.04 an ounce, silver
[00:12.080 --> 00:19.160]  $17.15 an ounce, Texas crude $53.54 a barrel, and Bitcoin broke $1,000 and is currently
[00:19.160 --> 00:24.200]  sitting at about 1,017 U.S. currency.
[00:24.200 --> 00:30.200]  Today in history, year 1918, the Twin Peaks Tunnel in San Francisco, California begins
[00:30.200 --> 00:38.880]  service as the longest streetcar tunnel in the world over two miles long today in history.
[00:38.880 --> 00:43.380]  In recent news, European Union leaders held a summit on the island of Malta Friday today
[00:43.380 --> 00:47.060]  in order to find effective ways in curtailing the smuggling of hundreds of thousands of
[00:47.060 --> 00:50.600]  refugees from North Africa into the European Union.
[00:50.600 --> 00:54.600]  These refugees sail across the Mediterranean via Libya's shorelines on boats which are
[00:54.600 --> 00:58.800]  overloaded in flimsy condition, resulting in capsizing and in the drowning of thousands
[00:58.800 --> 00:59.800]  of lives.
[00:59.800 --> 01:05.640]  It is estimated that roughly at least 5,083 refugees died from drowning last year alone.
[01:05.640 --> 01:10.300]  Italian Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni told reporters that, quote, naturally we're hoping
[01:10.300 --> 01:11.360]  for results.
[01:11.360 --> 01:15.560]  There won't be any miracles, but better management and reduction of illegal migrants are what
[01:15.560 --> 01:17.140]  we are working towards.
[01:17.140 --> 01:21.440]  An aid and cooperation deal was signed Thursday between Italy and Libyan Prime Minister Faiz
[01:21.440 --> 01:22.440]  Sarraj.
[01:22.440 --> 01:24.920]  However, not everyone is hopeful.
[01:24.920 --> 01:30.200]  Doctors Without Borders Director General Arjan Heckenkamp said that the EU's plan shows that
[01:30.200 --> 01:34.880]  it is, quote, delusional about just how dangerous the situation in Libya really is.
[01:34.880 --> 01:40.320]  A problem the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zayed Rahad al-Hussein, has noted
[01:40.320 --> 01:44.680]  that sending people back to countries where they may face torture, persecution or threats
[01:44.680 --> 01:46.600]  to their lives puts into doubt.
[01:46.600 --> 01:52.440]  The cornerstone of international human rights and refugee laws.
[01:52.440 --> 01:56.840]  A day after National Security Advisor Michael Flynn on Wednesday stated at a press conference
[01:56.840 --> 02:01.400]  that the U.S.'s, quote, officially putting Iran on notice since recent Iranian actions
[02:01.400 --> 02:05.520]  including a provocative ballistic missile launch and an attack against a Saudi naval
[02:05.520 --> 02:09.840]  vessel conducted by Iran-supported Houthi militants underscore what should have been
[02:09.840 --> 02:14.760]  clear in the international community all along about Iran's destabilizing behavior across
[02:14.760 --> 02:15.760]  the Middle East.
[02:15.760 --> 02:19.240]  White House Press Secretary and Communications Director Sean Spicer at Thursday's press
[02:19.240 --> 02:23.520]  briefing stated that, quote, I think General Flynn was really clear yesterday that Iran
[02:23.520 --> 02:27.840]  has violated the joint resolution, that Iran's additional hostile actions that it took against
[02:27.840 --> 02:32.740]  our navy vessel are ones that we are very clear are not going to sit by and take it.
[02:32.740 --> 02:36.920]  When interjected by the press, Spicer corrected his statement to a Saudi vessel but didn't
[02:36.920 --> 02:39.840]  address its false Iranian claims of affiliation.
[02:39.840 --> 02:44.020]  We hope and pray that this isn't an attempt at another Gulf of Tonkin-like scenario in
[02:44.020 --> 02:48.240]  order to ratchet up a war effort with the last nation General Wesley Clark revealed
[02:48.240 --> 03:15.400]  that the Bush Department of Defense was determined in invading Iran.
[03:15.400 --> 03:43.660]  We hope and pray that this isn't an attempt at another Gulf of Tonkin-like scenario in
[03:43.660 --> 04:03.620]  order to ratchet up a war effort with the last nation General Wesley Clark revealed
[04:03.620 --> 04:31.420]  that the Bush Department of Defense was determined in invading Iran.
[04:31.420 --> 04:35.500]  All right, folks, good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your
[04:35.500 --> 04:36.500]  host Eddie Craig.
[04:36.500 --> 04:40.540]  I just thought I'd let that play for a little bit and let that sink in.
[04:40.540 --> 04:46.980]  True to life music, you know, there's a lot of truth in that song, more than you would
[04:46.980 --> 04:52.660]  care to admit, more than you would care to experience.
[04:52.660 --> 04:54.820]  But here we are nonetheless.
[04:54.820 --> 04:58.460]  You ever wonder how we got to this point?
[04:58.460 --> 05:00.820]  I certainly do.
[05:00.820 --> 05:07.660]  I often wonder about the common sense of people when it comes to understanding why denial
[05:07.660 --> 05:17.660]  doesn't work, why failure to apply logic and critical thinking skills to an issue leads
[05:17.660 --> 05:21.580]  to more problems rather than solves them.
[05:21.580 --> 05:27.280]  And I got to tell you, it's really disappointing to admit you're a member of the human race
[05:27.280 --> 05:34.140]  when you realize that this is the way that most people have allowed themselves to be
[05:34.140 --> 05:41.220]  indoctrinated into no longer caring about their own welfare or that of their next generation
[05:41.220 --> 05:44.060]  of family members.
[05:44.060 --> 05:51.980]  They now accept the status quo as necessary rather than challenging it as intrusive and
[05:51.980 --> 05:56.300]  completely unnecessary.
[05:56.300 --> 06:00.700]  Now there's a lot that goes hand in hand with that.
[06:00.700 --> 06:06.220]  Back to the issue that I was discussing a couple weeks ago and last week as well, dealing
[06:06.220 --> 06:12.740]  with this legalese and the legal industry itself and how it's taken over not one entire
[06:12.740 --> 06:19.020]  department of government and has its tentacles in every other department to a large controlling
[06:19.020 --> 06:21.640]  degree.
[06:21.640 --> 06:26.900]  Now if you haven't been to the blog site lately, toweloflaw.wordpress.com, there is a new article
[06:26.900 --> 06:28.460]  posted up there.
[06:28.460 --> 06:34.540]  It's called the English language words versus legal terms of art, the corruption of an entire
[06:34.540 --> 06:38.440]  system of language by the legal profession.
[06:38.440 --> 06:48.300]  Now in there I discuss this language that the legal industry has devised and has aptly
[06:48.300 --> 06:50.500]  named legalese.
[06:50.500 --> 06:52.580]  And that is a real definition, folks.
[06:52.580 --> 06:54.540]  That's a real term.
[06:54.540 --> 06:57.860]  It has an actual definition.
[06:57.860 --> 07:00.140]  Let me give you an example of just two of them.
[07:00.140 --> 07:04.860]  The American Heritage Dictionary Online defines legalese this way.
[07:04.860 --> 07:11.860]  It's a noun, the specialized or technical language of the legal profession, especially
[07:11.860 --> 07:17.700]  when considered to be complex or abstruse.
[07:17.700 --> 07:24.060]  And the Collins English Dictionary Online gives us Webster's New World College Dictionaries
[07:24.060 --> 07:28.060]  more expanded and clarifying definition of the term.
[07:28.060 --> 07:33.120]  It defines legalese as a noun, but it reads this way.
[07:33.120 --> 07:40.660]  The conventional language of legal forms, documents, et cetera, involving special vocabulary
[07:40.660 --> 07:50.140]  and formulations, often thought of as abstruse and incomprehensible to the layman.
[07:50.140 --> 07:59.260]  That last part, the incomprehensible part, is entirely by intent and design.
[07:59.260 --> 08:08.540]  What better way to monopolize an entire industry than to require specialized training to even
[08:08.540 --> 08:19.080]  begin to comprehend the language of the industry, much less the processes involved in the industry?
[08:19.080 --> 08:24.820]  And then what does that say about the educational level of the individuals engaging in this
[08:24.820 --> 08:33.220]  so-called profession when they come into the practice of law and know less than nothing
[08:33.220 --> 08:38.500]  about the actual law?
[08:38.500 --> 08:42.660]  And it takes people like, not trying to sound like I'm tooting my own horn, but people like
[08:42.660 --> 08:48.460]  me and other people that I know, people on this network, Randy and Deborah included here,
[08:48.460 --> 08:54.760]  and several people on my Facebook groups and pages that are very, very competent in understanding
[08:54.760 --> 09:02.340]  how this all works and understanding the language that it's created and controlled by.
[09:02.340 --> 09:03.540]  We've learned the procedures.
[09:03.540 --> 09:05.060]  We've learned the actual law.
[09:05.060 --> 09:07.100]  We've learned the rules of evidence.
[09:07.100 --> 09:14.660]  We've learned all of the things the attorneys have just by reading, while they spent $100,000
[09:14.660 --> 09:20.100]  to get an education that taught them absolutely nothing except someone else's opinion about
[09:20.100 --> 09:27.260]  what they are reading, whereas we have actually dug in and read the actual law that these
[09:27.260 --> 09:32.660]  opinions are failing to address on a point-by-point basis.
[09:32.660 --> 09:40.700]  They are simply cherry picking the result from the statutes that they want to use to
[09:40.700 --> 09:46.320]  create the appearance of the result being legitimate.
[09:46.320 --> 09:52.440]  It's not legitimate because one of their other rules is, as I said before, is the requirement
[09:52.440 --> 10:01.860]  that statutes, laws of every kind, be read in paramateria in relation to other statutes
[10:01.860 --> 10:05.200]  on the same subject.
[10:05.200 --> 10:10.060]  No piece of the law is a separate piece.
[10:10.060 --> 10:19.620]  It relies upon the context and relationship with other law and statute dealing with the
[10:19.620 --> 10:23.300]  same subject matter.
[10:23.300 --> 10:30.580]  This law includes the constitutional limitations, both federal and state, upon how that interpretation
[10:30.580 --> 10:36.220]  and application can actually take place.
[10:36.220 --> 10:41.420]  When you look at what the legal profession has attempted to do, they have attempted to
[10:41.420 --> 10:51.460]  both circumvent and completely deny the controlling power of constitutional prohibitions on what
[10:51.460 --> 10:53.460]  they do.
[10:53.460 --> 10:56.420]  The evidence of this is in their own opinions.
[10:56.420 --> 11:03.220]  Their opinions that fly directly in the face of the clear language and individual rights
[11:03.220 --> 11:11.060]  encompassed by the Bill of Rights in the various constitutions.
[11:11.060 --> 11:18.860]  This idiotic rule that the courts have come up with that no one's rights are absolute.
[11:18.860 --> 11:23.860]  They're seeming to forget one little thing about that statement.
[11:23.860 --> 11:30.780]  No one's rights are absolute in the sense that you may not use your rights to violate
[11:30.780 --> 11:37.360]  the rights or property of any other individual or group.
[11:37.360 --> 11:44.660]  If you do use your rights in that matter, or in that manner, your rights can be taken
[11:44.660 --> 11:52.700]  away as a punishment for the harm you inflicted through that misuse of those rights.
[11:52.700 --> 12:05.620]  But until that happens, your rights are absolute and the government, your servant, has absolutely
[12:05.620 --> 12:14.140]  no authority to interfere with their exercise or to claim in any way whatsoever that you
[12:14.140 --> 12:18.700]  may not use them as they have always been available to you.
[12:18.700 --> 12:29.860]  That you must somehow curb them because you are now a member of a society.
[12:29.860 --> 12:41.660]  The only curbing of your rights goes directly to that first instance, harm to another.
[12:41.660 --> 12:46.420]  Now these people want you to think that they're the only ones that knows what constitutes
[12:46.420 --> 12:51.860]  a proper exercise of your rights.
[12:51.860 --> 12:56.140]  They're dead wrong.
[12:56.140 --> 13:02.700]  Every person knows when they have used their power to harm someone else.
[13:02.700 --> 13:12.140]  They may not care, it may not concern them, but they damn sure know they've done it.
[13:12.140 --> 13:20.160]  If it was done with intent, and the only other way they could have done it and not known
[13:20.160 --> 13:28.540]  it would have been through negligence because there the situation is that the individual
[13:28.540 --> 13:34.580]  could have known or should have known that that particular exercise of their rights had
[13:34.580 --> 13:41.580]  a greater than possible eventuality of causing harm.
[13:41.580 --> 13:47.620]  It's like throwing rocks off an overpass into a busy stream of traffic.
[13:47.620 --> 13:54.820]  Sure, you may hit the pavement five out of six times, but that sixth time you hit someone
[13:54.820 --> 13:57.740]  and their or their car or whatever.
[13:57.740 --> 14:04.860]  But the whole point is that the other five times were so egregiously dangerous that they
[14:04.860 --> 14:12.620]  are just as wrong as the sixth rock where you actually hit someone.
[14:12.620 --> 14:18.900]  It's the same thing as firing a gun into a crowd of people, even though you hit absolutely
[14:18.900 --> 14:20.200]  no one.
[14:20.200 --> 14:27.940]  The act itself was so egregiously dangerous and negligent that it was criminal to even
[14:27.940 --> 14:33.020]  consider doing it.
[14:33.020 --> 14:43.500]  Those are the times when your rights are not absolute, not just because some moron that
[14:43.500 --> 14:51.300]  thinks he has a better education at Common Sense than you do decides to create a statute
[14:51.300 --> 14:58.420]  that says we can now interfere with your rights because, but they can give you no legitimate
[14:58.420 --> 15:08.300]  basis for showing that the action they're taking will actually prevent the thing they're
[15:08.300 --> 15:13.300]  claiming they're taking it for.
[15:13.300 --> 15:20.920]  For instance, making it a crime to fire a gun into a crowd is not something that the
[15:20.920 --> 15:25.340]  legislature actually has to do.
[15:25.340 --> 15:33.820]  This is a common law crime already, but by putting it into a written statute, they run
[15:33.820 --> 15:39.940]  the risk of leaving loopholes as to how it can be applied, whereas in the Common Sense
[15:39.940 --> 15:47.540]  world of, look, I don't care whether it was a crowd of two or a crowd of 500, the act
[15:47.540 --> 15:51.100]  was negligent.
[15:51.100 --> 16:01.860]  Doesn't matter whether you could have killed one or 20, the act was negligent.
[16:01.860 --> 16:06.940]  Yet they think that in order to do everything that has to be done, they have to write everything
[16:06.940 --> 16:12.740]  down and run the risk of causing that very problem.
[16:12.740 --> 16:17.300]  But as we've noticed from many other things that we've talked about on this show, it is
[16:17.300 --> 16:24.420]  not about prevention of some activity that would harm the public.
[16:24.420 --> 16:28.260]  It is about control of the public.
[16:28.260 --> 16:36.260]  It is about revenue generated from the backs of the public.
[16:36.260 --> 16:41.420]  All you have to do to fully realize that is to look at any malum prohibitum thing they
[16:41.420 --> 16:48.660]  tell you they have and then try to rationalize how they define the fact that it will cause
[16:48.660 --> 16:53.620]  more harm more often than not if you're allowed to do this without punishment.
[16:53.620 --> 16:58.380]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang in there.
[16:58.380 --> 16:59.380]  Dang, Cookie.
[16:59.380 --> 17:00.380]  Cookie?
[17:00.380 --> 17:01.380]  Me love cookies.
[17:01.380 --> 17:02.380]  Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers.
[17:02.380 --> 17:03.380]  No, these are yucky cookies.
[17:03.380 --> 17:04.380]  Cookie?
[17:04.380 --> 17:05.380]  Yucky?
[17:05.380 --> 17:06.380]  No, no bad cookies.
[17:06.380 --> 17:07.380]  You can't even eat these cookies.
[17:07.380 --> 17:12.380]  These are cyber cookies.
[17:12.380 --> 17:13.380]  No, can't eat?
[17:13.380 --> 17:14.380]  No, they are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[17:14.380 --> 17:15.380]  These have apples.
[17:15.380 --> 17:16.380]  Really?
[17:16.380 --> 17:17.380]  Oh, that's an actual apple.
[17:17.380 --> 17:18.380]  Yummy apple.
[17:18.380 --> 17:19.380]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:19.380 --> 17:20.380]  I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:20.380 --> 17:21.380]  Bye-bye, yucky cookies.
[17:21.380 --> 17:22.380]  Now, I go to logosradio.network.com.
[17:22.380 --> 17:23.380]  Bye.
[17:23.380 --> 17:24.380]  Bye.
[17:24.380 --> 17:25.380]  Bye.
[17:25.380 --> 17:26.380]  Bye.
[17:26.380 --> 17:27.380]  Bye.
[17:27.380 --> 17:28.380]  Bye.
[17:28.380 --> 17:29.380]  Bye.
[17:29.380 --> 17:30.380]  Bye.
[17:30.380 --> 17:31.380]  Bye.
[17:31.380 --> 17:32.380]  Bye.
[17:32.380 --> 17:33.380]  Bye.
[17:33.380 --> 17:34.380]  Bye.
[17:34.380 --> 17:40.180]  Now, I go to logosradio.network.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand
[17:40.180 --> 17:46.220]  side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy
[17:46.220 --> 17:47.220]  new cookies.
[17:47.220 --> 17:48.220]  New cookies?
[17:48.220 --> 17:49.220]  For me?
[17:49.220 --> 17:51.060]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[17:51.060 --> 17:55.860]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this
[17:55.860 --> 17:56.860]  radio network, too.
[17:56.860 --> 17:57.860]  These are cookies.
[17:57.860 --> 17:58.860]  These are classified.
[17:58.860 --> 18:05.260]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.260 --> 18:09.340]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.340 --> 18:13.660]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.660 --> 18:14.660]  can win, too.
[18:14.660 --> 18:19.620]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.620 --> 18:25.260]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.260 --> 18:28.660]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to get credit
[18:28.660 --> 18:34.100]  reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.100 --> 18:39.220]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.220 --> 18:41.220]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.220 --> 18:46.980]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[18:46.980 --> 18:49.180]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.180 --> 18:58.580]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop
[18:58.580 --> 18:59.580]  debt collectors now.
[18:59.580 --> 19:00.580]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, l-l-l-LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:00.580 --> 19:01.580]  Here we go.
[19:01.580 --> 19:28.580]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, l-l-l-LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:28.580 --> 19:48.580]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, l-l-l-LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:48.580 --> 19:59.140]  All right, folks.
[19:59.140 --> 20:00.340]  We are back.
[20:00.340 --> 20:04.500]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the Monday Night Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[20:04.500 --> 20:09.680]  Now while I'm coming up on the top of the break here, I'm going to put in a little kick
[20:09.680 --> 20:10.680]  by the fundraiser.
[20:10.680 --> 20:14.780]  Remember that the network, the Logos Radio Network, has its fundraiser going on right
[20:14.780 --> 20:23.860]  now, and you can go to the LogosRadioNetwork.com homepage, and in the large box to the left,
[20:23.860 --> 20:27.860]  you will see everything about the fundraiser that's going on there, including the fact
[20:27.860 --> 20:35.420]  that we are having a giveaway on the fundraiser of a Spikes Tactical AR-15 rifle sponsored
[20:35.420 --> 20:38.120]  by Central Texas Gunworks.
[20:38.120 --> 20:43.420]  Every $25 donation gets you an entry into the drawing for the rifle.
[20:43.420 --> 20:50.180]  The purchase of Randy's new e-book, Legal 101, gets you four entries, and the purchase
[20:50.180 --> 20:53.940]  of the seminar material gets you 10 entries.
[20:53.940 --> 20:58.100]  So there are many ways to benefit from this, not just in the fact that you could win the
[20:58.100 --> 21:04.860]  AR-15, but you could also benefit from having Randy's book and having the seminar material.
[21:04.860 --> 21:12.220]  If you don't have it yet, hopefully some of the folks that do have it will call in and
[21:12.220 --> 21:16.100]  let you know what they think about it, or we'll try to come up with some way for them
[21:16.100 --> 21:19.940]  to post comments about it, just whatever.
[21:19.940 --> 21:26.060]  But just so you know that I've never gotten a detrimental complaint about the contents
[21:26.060 --> 21:27.780]  of the seminar material.
[21:27.780 --> 21:32.020]  I personally have never gotten one, no email, no conversation, nothing.
[21:32.020 --> 21:38.060]  All I've gotten from anyone that's ever purchased it is the fact that they love it.
[21:38.060 --> 21:42.860]  They love the information, they can verify the information that's in it, there's nothing
[21:42.860 --> 21:48.480]  in there that sends you off on these theoretical fishing trips with nothing to support the
[21:48.480 --> 21:51.840]  statement that I make in any of that material.
[21:51.840 --> 21:57.060]  Everything is right there in front of you, the law, the argument, and why that's the
[21:57.060 --> 21:59.900]  argument.
[21:59.900 --> 22:04.060]  But that's up to you as to how well you want to play this game.
[22:04.060 --> 22:09.780]  And as like I said in the article that I put up on the blog, if you're going to go into
[22:09.780 --> 22:16.300]  a negotiation with someone, it helps if you can understand each other.
[22:16.300 --> 22:21.180]  Imagine trying to put together a contract with someone and neither of you speak the
[22:21.180 --> 22:27.940]  other person's language, and you have no direct method by which you may communicate.
[22:27.940 --> 22:34.060]  How are you supposed to work out the terms of your agreement and come to a meeting of
[22:34.060 --> 22:38.300]  the minds for there to be a valid contract made here?
[22:38.300 --> 22:45.060]  Well, without that ability, there's only two ways that you can get there.
[22:45.060 --> 22:52.700]  One, you get an interpreter that speaks both languages, or two, one or both of you have
[22:52.700 --> 22:59.120]  to learn the other person's language, other party's language.
[22:59.120 --> 23:06.180]  So when you're going into this courtroom, understand that the language sounds and looks
[23:06.180 --> 23:07.180]  familiar.
[23:07.180 --> 23:16.100]  It looks just like what you think your language is, but it's not.
[23:16.100 --> 23:25.420]  Imagine if you would a conversation with a Frenchman who uses English words for everything,
[23:25.420 --> 23:27.300]  okay?
[23:27.300 --> 23:34.740]  But uses an entirely different meaning in French for those terms.
[23:34.740 --> 23:40.380]  So even though it sounds like you understand exactly what he's saying and talking about,
[23:40.380 --> 23:46.220]  in reality, he is saying something completely different.
[23:46.220 --> 23:51.260]  That's what you're facing when you enter a courtroom with these attorneys and judges,
[23:51.260 --> 23:55.340]  and they count on you to not know that.
[23:55.340 --> 24:03.240]  When they say, we're going to use these terms and phrases in their common and ordinary meaning,
[24:03.240 --> 24:10.580]  they are lying to you, or at least they're misrepresenting the context of common and ordinary
[24:10.580 --> 24:12.720]  to you.
[24:12.720 --> 24:18.140]  From a logical standpoint, look at it this way.
[24:18.140 --> 24:28.820]  The judicial system and government in general has no direct reason or ability to communicate
[24:28.820 --> 24:32.580]  with the people, none.
[24:32.580 --> 24:42.100]  The only time that you and the government can communicate is when you are doing so through
[24:42.100 --> 24:48.380]  the megaphone of law, either through some service they're supposed to provide to you
[24:48.380 --> 24:54.980]  by law, or some interaction they're required to have with you by law, or they're accusing
[24:54.980 --> 24:57.980]  you of breaking some law.
[24:57.980 --> 25:01.300]  Now, you want proof of this?
[25:01.300 --> 25:02.300]  Okay.
[25:02.300 --> 25:06.300]  The last time your government sent you a Christmas card just saying, hey, wanted to see how you
[25:06.300 --> 25:10.620]  were doing, I wish you a happy New Year and all that good stuff, Merry Christmas, blah,
[25:10.620 --> 25:11.620]  blah, blah.
[25:11.620 --> 25:13.340]  Doesn't happen.
[25:13.340 --> 25:16.180]  You don't get text messages from them saying, hey, just check it in and see how your day
[25:16.180 --> 25:19.300]  is going, give us a call, let us know what's up, we just want to be interested in what's
[25:19.300 --> 25:22.500]  going on and see how we may help you.
[25:22.500 --> 25:25.740]  No, doesn't happen, why?
[25:25.740 --> 25:31.780]  Because the only way and reason they have to talk to us is through the mechanism and
[25:31.780 --> 25:36.260]  the language of law.
[25:36.260 --> 25:41.580]  So when they tell you that they are using terms and phrases in their common and ordinary
[25:41.580 --> 25:50.740]  meaning, they can only be asserting common and ordinary meaning as determined by its
[25:50.740 --> 26:01.740]  historical usage in law, not in Webster's English, okay?
[26:01.740 --> 26:04.540]  It's just a common sense concept.
[26:04.540 --> 26:10.620]  Now, I had someone post a question to me on Facebook about some of these attorneys talking
[26:10.620 --> 26:14.700]  about how to simplify your legal writing.
[26:14.700 --> 26:21.180]  And in there, they say, don't try to use the same language the attorneys do, simplify it,
[26:21.180 --> 26:26.420]  say simpler things, instead of saying motor vehicle, say your car and blah, blah, blah.
[26:26.420 --> 26:32.420]  Well, one of the things my article addresses is why they want you to do that.
[26:32.420 --> 26:39.620]  By getting you to take the common English words and phrases and making them the legal
[26:39.620 --> 26:48.880]  equivalent through usage of the legalese forms and language, they are further blurring the
[26:48.880 --> 26:57.740]  line of legal versus private where they must prove that element of that offense as it relates
[26:57.740 --> 27:03.940]  to a motor vehicle versus your car.
[27:03.940 --> 27:05.500]  You understand that?
[27:05.500 --> 27:12.100]  By getting you to say car, they are getting you to equivocate your car with their legal
[27:12.100 --> 27:20.620]  motor vehicle when in fact it is not at all the same thing.
[27:20.620 --> 27:23.020]  The context is wrong.
[27:23.020 --> 27:25.700]  The capacity is wrong.
[27:25.700 --> 27:30.700]  They are not the same thing.
[27:30.700 --> 27:36.120]  Yet they constantly say simplify the language and the courts are constantly saying by making
[27:36.120 --> 27:40.260]  the allegation and getting testimony from a witness that someone did so-and-so with
[27:40.260 --> 27:44.940]  their car, the state effectively proved motor vehicle.
[27:44.940 --> 27:52.940]  That's as bogus a ruling as you can get because the court has now completely changed the statutory
[27:52.940 --> 28:01.180]  meaning of that term with no legitimate authority to do so because the legislature has already
[28:01.180 --> 28:07.580]  defined it within a specific context from which the court may not legitimately remove
[28:07.580 --> 28:08.580]  it.
[28:08.580 --> 28:18.180]  And yet that is exactly what they are doing.
[28:18.180 --> 28:22.180]  There is a reason it is a language unto itself.
[28:22.180 --> 28:30.940]  There is a reason why its context is limited to the application of law and not common everyday
[28:30.940 --> 28:35.660]  language and interactions.
[28:35.660 --> 28:46.420]  But they count on you accusing to remain ignorant and have no understanding of that particularity
[28:46.420 --> 28:50.260]  of what they do.
[28:50.260 --> 28:58.600]  And they use it against you to their advantage every single day.
[28:58.600 --> 29:03.820]  So when you have a prosecutor or a judge saying, I'm not going to argue legal semantics with
[29:03.820 --> 29:12.020]  you, object, say, excuse me, judge, but our prosecutor, every single term and phrase in
[29:12.020 --> 29:15.460]  the statute is legal semantics.
[29:15.460 --> 29:20.140]  You cannot say I violated the statute and then turn around and say you're not going
[29:20.140 --> 29:21.900]  to argue the semantics.
[29:21.900 --> 29:25.060]  That's exactly what you're doing.
[29:25.060 --> 29:32.140]  You're making a semantical allegation and then you want it to just be accepted without
[29:32.140 --> 29:37.020]  challenge and you can't do that either because I'm here to challenge it.
[29:37.020 --> 29:42.340]  So whether you like it or not, you're going to argue about it because I'm here to do
[29:42.340 --> 29:44.980]  just that.
[29:44.980 --> 29:48.980]  But you've got to understand the language first, folks, or the arguments move.
[29:48.980 --> 29:54.780]  All right, y'all hang in there calling number 512-646-1984.
[29:54.780 --> 29:59.380]  We'll start taking your calls on the other side if I have anybody up and going.
[29:59.380 --> 30:03.540]  How long will you live?
[30:03.540 --> 30:07.740]  Life insurance companies want to know and they're harvesting information from some surprising
[30:07.740 --> 30:10.740]  sources to determine your risk and set insurance premiums.
[30:10.740 --> 30:14.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with more.
[30:14.700 --> 30:20.020]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database
[30:20.020 --> 30:21.700]  of your personal information.
[30:21.700 --> 30:22.980]  That's creepy.
[30:22.980 --> 30:25.100]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:25.100 --> 30:28.220]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:28.220 --> 30:32.340]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking
[30:32.340 --> 30:34.620]  cookies and they're third party certified.
[30:34.620 --> 30:39.100]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[30:39.100 --> 30:41.940]  Great search results and total privacy.
[30:41.940 --> 30:45.180]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:45.180 --> 30:49.700]  Life insurance companies used to set rates based on application information and medical
[30:49.700 --> 30:54.300]  exams, but now companies are turning to marketing databases for clues.
[30:54.300 --> 30:58.720]  They're sussing out credit card purchases, internet activity, magazine subscriptions
[30:58.720 --> 31:03.300]  and grocery card data and social media posts are an even bigger bonanza.
[31:03.300 --> 31:08.040]  They're looking for lifestyle indicators like physical activity, financial status and healthy
[31:08.040 --> 31:10.820]  food choices to see who's likely to keel over.
[31:10.820 --> 31:13.700]  Better not post that photo if you're a prize winning cheesecake.
[31:13.700 --> 31:16.620]  This is just one more reason to guard your privacy.
[31:16.620 --> 31:20.700]  If you leave a trail of negative lifestyle indicators, you could find yourself uninsurable
[31:20.700 --> 31:23.340]  or paying exorbitant life insurance premiums.
[31:23.340 --> 31:25.300]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:25.300 --> 31:27.780]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:27.780 --> 31:31.540]  What are you thinking?
[31:31.540 --> 31:37.700]  Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month.
[31:37.700 --> 31:43.340]  If USA.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from
[31:43.340 --> 31:48.820]  your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach and colon and feel better than ever, it alkalizes.
[31:48.820 --> 31:50.820]  Oxygen A kills parasites.
[31:50.820 --> 31:54.620]  How's the job of 10 products that saves you space, time and money?
[31:54.620 --> 31:59.140]  Call 888-910-4367 only at USA.org.
[31:59.140 --> 32:04.700]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:04.700 --> 32:07.100]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society.
[32:07.100 --> 32:10.500]  If we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to
[32:10.500 --> 32:12.100]  stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.100 --> 32:15.700]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:15.700 --> 32:19.380]  in our own private capacity and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.380 --> 32:23.580]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:23.580 --> 32:24.940]  our rights through due process.
[32:24.940 --> 32:28.940]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the
[32:28.940 --> 32:32.700]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:32.700 --> 32:34.780]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:34.780 --> 32:39.100]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:39.100 --> 32:40.420]  ordering your copy today.
[32:40.420 --> 32:43.700]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:43.700 --> 32:48.180]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.180 --> 32:49.980]  documents and other useful resource material.
[32:49.980 --> 32:53.740]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:53.740 --> 33:23.660]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:23.740 --> 33:52.500]  All right, folks, we are back.
[33:52.500 --> 33:59.380]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:59.380 --> 34:02.820]  You want to call and get in line, we are going to start taking your calls.
[34:02.820 --> 34:07.500]  All right, that being said, let's see who's up on the board first.
[34:07.500 --> 34:11.420]  All right, this is Trumpet Dave.
[34:11.420 --> 34:15.940]  Dave, what can we do for you or do you prefer to be called Trumpet?
[34:15.940 --> 34:16.940]  Yes.
[34:16.940 --> 34:22.060]  Yeah, I like Trumpet Dave's spine or Trumpet, yeah.
[34:22.060 --> 34:23.060]  Okay.
[34:23.060 --> 34:25.060]  What can we do for you?
[34:25.060 --> 34:26.060]  Randy.
[34:26.060 --> 34:31.060]  No, not Randy, this is Eddie.
[34:31.060 --> 34:45.980]  Eddie, during my jury trial, if my lawyer is not doing what I think he should, can I
[34:45.980 --> 34:49.060]  fire him during the jury?
[34:49.060 --> 34:50.060]  Sure.
[34:50.060 --> 34:56.060]  You can fire the attorney anytime you want, but you have to expect that if you do that,
[34:56.060 --> 35:00.020]  they're not going to let you stop and go after other counsel, you're going to be forced to
[35:00.020 --> 35:01.020]  handle it yourself.
[35:01.020 --> 35:02.020]  Right, right.
[35:02.020 --> 35:08.260]  Well, I think I can do a better job maybe than him, so I want to make sure.
[35:08.260 --> 35:11.460]  Well, if you can, then go for it.
[35:11.460 --> 35:14.460]  Yeah, yeah.
[35:14.460 --> 35:25.820]  When I'm cross-examining and then, well, the defendant and me as the plaintiff, there's
[35:25.820 --> 35:27.340]  going to be a lot of cross-examination.
[35:27.340 --> 35:34.820]  Well, wait a minute, if you're the plaintiff, you don't do cross, you do direct.
[35:34.820 --> 35:38.460]  The other side gets to do cross.
[35:38.460 --> 35:41.460]  Okay, okay.
[35:41.460 --> 35:44.380]  Good, good.
[35:44.380 --> 35:47.340]  Not necessarily.
[35:47.340 --> 35:52.580]  In direct examination, you cannot ask leading questions.
[35:52.580 --> 35:58.860]  You must know how to ask the question to get the answer you want without making it a leading
[35:58.860 --> 36:00.060]  question.
[36:00.060 --> 36:03.980]  If you don't know what a leading question is, you're already in trouble.
[36:03.980 --> 36:10.980]  Now, the only time that you can ask a leading question on direct examination is if it is
[36:10.980 --> 36:16.940]  to clarify a specific previously testified to fact.
[36:16.940 --> 36:24.940]  In other words, you're asking them about something they testified to earlier or a moment ago
[36:24.940 --> 36:27.980]  and you're wanting clarification.
[36:27.980 --> 36:37.140]  By testifying such-and-such, did you actually mean A, B, C, or D?
[36:37.140 --> 36:39.580]  Okay.
[36:39.580 --> 36:46.380]  I'm planning to file a petition against my doctor.
[36:46.380 --> 36:49.540]  What is a petition against your doctor?
[36:49.540 --> 37:04.180]  Well, basically, I had an operation and it went really bad.
[37:04.180 --> 37:11.220]  What you're filing is a civil lawsuit for medical malpractice against your doctor, not
[37:11.220 --> 37:12.220]  a petition.
[37:12.220 --> 37:13.220]  Right.
[37:13.220 --> 37:14.220]  Okay.
[37:14.220 --> 37:15.220]  Right.
[37:15.220 --> 37:21.900]  I would file that in district court.
[37:21.900 --> 37:26.660]  Well, I don't know what state you're in, so I don't know what court you'd file it in.
[37:26.660 --> 37:27.660]  Yeah.
[37:27.660 --> 37:31.980]  Well, I'm in Travis County and I just go down to the courtroom here.
[37:31.980 --> 37:35.900]  Then, yeah, you would file it in the district court unless it's a federal lawsuit.
[37:35.900 --> 37:39.580]  You're claiming some sort of federal violation of rights instead of just a regular violation
[37:39.580 --> 37:41.580]  of rights.
[37:41.580 --> 37:42.580]  Yeah.
[37:42.580 --> 37:43.580]  Yeah.
[37:43.580 --> 37:52.300]  Eddie, as you know, this kind of trial goes on for literally years.
[37:52.300 --> 37:55.820]  Something else we have to thank the attorneys for, yes.
[37:55.820 --> 37:59.540]  How would I file?
[37:59.540 --> 38:04.780]  I'm thinking I just want to kind of scare these...
[38:04.780 --> 38:05.780]  Okay.
[38:05.780 --> 38:06.780]  Well, hang on.
[38:06.780 --> 38:10.060]  Let me get something in your ear here real quick.
[38:10.060 --> 38:18.620]  In Texas, there is a law against the unauthorized practice of law, 39.03 and 39.02 of the penal
[38:18.620 --> 38:19.620]  code.
[38:19.620 --> 38:24.220]  One is holding oneself out to be an attorney and the other is holding the unauthorized
[38:24.220 --> 38:25.900]  practice of law.
[38:25.900 --> 38:32.780]  The unauthorized practice of law under the penal code is specifically directed at personal
[38:32.780 --> 38:38.740]  injury lawsuits, which is what you are attempting to ask me about.
[38:38.740 --> 38:48.860]  As that is the case, I cannot and am not going to give you specific advice or recommendations
[38:48.860 --> 38:51.420]  in relation to that case.
[38:51.420 --> 38:52.420]  Are we clear?
[38:52.420 --> 38:53.420]  Okay.
[38:53.420 --> 38:59.340]  Now, if you want to ask me some general question about if person A was to do something like
[38:59.340 --> 39:04.860]  this or that, and I can give you an example, but I cannot talk to you in that particular
[39:04.860 --> 39:07.980]  instance about your particular case.
[39:07.980 --> 39:10.060]  All right.
[39:10.060 --> 39:12.860]  Just general questions.
[39:12.860 --> 39:18.020]  Question one, picketing.
[39:18.020 --> 39:24.420]  Several people have bothered me in Southeast Austin, and I-
[39:24.420 --> 39:30.260]  Did you say ticketing with a T or picketing with a P as in Paul?
[39:30.260 --> 39:32.540]  Picketing.
[39:32.540 --> 39:40.340]  I want to hire people to go in front of these people who have disturbed me with signs saying,
[39:40.340 --> 39:43.300]  well, what they've done to me.
[39:43.300 --> 39:44.300]  Okay.
[39:44.300 --> 39:49.340]  So you understand that without something to back it up, you're setting yourself and your
[39:49.340 --> 39:53.940]  picketers up for a slander or libel suit, right?
[39:53.940 --> 39:54.940]  Right.
[39:54.940 --> 39:55.940]  Right.
[39:55.940 --> 39:58.780]  I will not say anything outrageous.
[39:58.780 --> 40:04.780]  It's one thing if you are going at a business, an incorporated business for that purpose.
[40:04.780 --> 40:08.220]  It's another thing if you're going directly at an individual.
[40:08.220 --> 40:13.660]  No, this is all corporates.
[40:13.660 --> 40:15.740]  All corporate bill businesses.
[40:15.740 --> 40:22.780]  Well, like I say, anything you do, in either case, you better be able to back up.
[40:22.780 --> 40:29.900]  Well, yeah, because when the police arrives saying, why is this guy picketing in front
[40:29.900 --> 40:30.900]  of our place?
[40:30.900 --> 40:36.300]  I want to be able to pull out a sheet of paper to show the sheriff.
[40:36.300 --> 40:39.420]  I applied for this at court.
[40:39.420 --> 40:40.420]  No.
[40:40.420 --> 40:41.420]  Okay.
[40:41.420 --> 40:44.820]  I'm not talking about a permit.
[40:44.820 --> 40:51.700]  I'm talking about if your sign says this person murdered my wife, you better have proof that
[40:51.700 --> 41:00.420]  person murdered your wife or that is slander or in this case, since it's in print, it's
[41:00.420 --> 41:01.420]  libel.
[41:01.420 --> 41:02.420]  Okay.
[41:02.420 --> 41:03.420]  Okay.
[41:03.420 --> 41:04.420]  Good point.
[41:04.420 --> 41:11.820]  But, you know, I generally am not going to do that.
[41:11.820 --> 41:16.700]  Well, then how are you going to put picketers out there saying this person did A, B, C or
[41:16.700 --> 41:21.140]  D to me and not do that?
[41:21.140 --> 41:23.380]  Well, again, you're right.
[41:23.380 --> 41:29.580]  I'm just going to have a, I'm going to have picketers saying this doctor ruined my such
[41:29.580 --> 41:30.580]  and such.
[41:30.580 --> 41:31.580]  Okay.
[41:31.580 --> 41:34.820]  Again, and your proof of this is what?
[41:34.820 --> 41:42.700]  Well, because remember such that type of activity will have a detrimental impact on his practice.
[41:42.700 --> 41:48.540]  And if you cannot substantiate what you're doing to harm him, you're going to get slapped
[41:48.540 --> 41:54.940]  with a slander or libel lawsuit.
[41:54.940 --> 41:55.940]  That's fine.
[41:55.940 --> 41:59.540]  I will fight the slander because I have pictures.
[41:59.540 --> 42:01.700]  I'm not arguing about whether or not you'll fight it.
[42:01.700 --> 42:04.780]  I'm just making you aware that it's entirely possible.
[42:04.780 --> 42:08.700]  You may have to.
[42:08.700 --> 42:09.700]  Thank you.
[42:09.700 --> 42:12.700]  Very good point.
[42:12.700 --> 42:18.380]  What, do you have any idea?
[42:18.380 --> 42:22.940]  Would I just ask the judge for permission to pick it or is there specific?
[42:22.940 --> 42:27.220]  Why would you ask a judge for permission to pick it?
[42:27.220 --> 42:31.540]  You can get a permit for a public gathering if that's what you need to do.
[42:31.540 --> 42:37.620]  Now you wouldn't have to do that if it's political speech, but this is not political speech.
[42:37.620 --> 42:42.660]  It may be protected speech, but you would still be occupying a public place for a particular
[42:42.660 --> 42:48.500]  purpose that may require you to have a permit since it's not politically or rights-based
[42:48.500 --> 42:50.460]  protesting.
[42:50.460 --> 42:52.420]  Okay.
[42:52.420 --> 42:54.100]  Okay.
[42:54.100 --> 42:56.140]  And I can ask for that permit in-
[42:56.140 --> 43:04.060]  Down at City Hall, wherever they issue permits for that.
[43:04.060 --> 43:05.140]  Is it expensive?
[43:05.140 --> 43:07.060]  I have no idea.
[43:07.060 --> 43:09.340]  I've never applied for one.
[43:09.340 --> 43:11.460]  All right.
[43:11.460 --> 43:15.940]  I don't know what kind of permits they require or what they designate one or 50 different
[43:15.940 --> 43:17.940]  ones as.
[43:17.940 --> 43:19.620]  Okay.
[43:19.620 --> 43:23.060]  All right.
[43:23.060 --> 43:31.220]  If I don't like the judge, after the trial, can I go directly to the clerk's office and
[43:31.220 --> 43:34.940]  ask that he be removed from the case?
[43:34.940 --> 43:43.420]  How are you going to remove a judge after the case has been tried, which is what you
[43:43.420 --> 43:44.420]  just asked me?
[43:44.420 --> 43:47.700]  After the case is done, can I have a judge removed?
[43:47.700 --> 43:49.260]  No, it's done.
[43:49.260 --> 43:51.220]  Hang on just a second, Dave.
[43:51.220 --> 43:54.220]  We'll be right back.
[43:54.220 --> 44:03.940]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.940 --> 44:10.700]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[44:10.700 --> 44:13.860]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:13.860 --> 44:18.420]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.420 --> 44:22.700]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.700 --> 44:28.420]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.420 --> 44:34.340]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.340 --> 44:38.900]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[44:38.900 --> 44:43.180]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.180 --> 44:49.380]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.380 --> 44:51.900]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.900 --> 45:00.140]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.140 --> 45:09.260]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our
[45:09.260 --> 45:16.340]  store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D, here in Austin, Texas, to see all our fantastic
[45:16.340 --> 45:18.700]  health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.700 --> 45:23.740]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.740 --> 45:27.740]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil,
[45:27.740 --> 45:31.460]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.460 --> 45:38.460]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.460 --> 45:44.300]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.300 --> 46:12.460]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.300 --> 46:28.900]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:28.900 --> 46:30.700]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:30.700 --> 46:34.380]  All right, now let's see if we can finish up the Trumpet Dave here real quick.
[46:34.380 --> 46:42.220]  All right, Dave, now, as far as all the rest of this goes, understand the situation you're
[46:42.220 --> 46:45.900]  in and all with all this, but what exactly is your question?
[46:45.900 --> 46:50.660]  Because I've got a lot of callers on the board right now, so I can't spend all night with
[46:50.660 --> 46:51.660]  you here.
[46:51.660 --> 46:52.660]  Yeah, all right.
[46:52.660 --> 46:55.900]  I'm going to have to spend all night with me.
[46:55.900 --> 47:10.980]  Okay, I have evidence that is pictures, film on a telephone, on a smartphone, and pictures
[47:10.980 --> 47:13.940]  on a laptop.
[47:13.940 --> 47:18.100]  Can I bring these into the courtroom as evidence?
[47:18.100 --> 47:22.180]  If you can show how they're relevant to the case and you can verify where they came from
[47:22.180 --> 47:24.740]  in their source, yeah.
[47:24.740 --> 47:29.020]  But if you're not the actual source, then you have to have whoever took those pictures
[47:29.020 --> 47:34.300]  and made those recordings take the stand and testify that they did so.
[47:34.300 --> 47:39.140]  And you have to do so in such a way as to make both their testimony and those pictures
[47:39.140 --> 47:43.460]  and videos relevant as evidence in your case.
[47:43.460 --> 47:49.380]  If you fail to do that, the other side will move to suppress them, and you're stuck.
[47:49.380 --> 47:54.420]  You can't use them if the judge grants their motion.
[47:54.420 --> 48:02.860]  Okay, all right, good.
[48:02.860 --> 48:15.620]  In this, I have a small claims case, JP case, if I win and I win the $10,000, how do I get
[48:15.620 --> 48:17.420]  that check?
[48:17.420 --> 48:23.220]  Well, collection is a different process.
[48:23.220 --> 48:30.260]  What you'll need is a signed order by the court verifying the judgment, okay, so that
[48:30.260 --> 48:36.380]  you can then use that order from the court to go to the sheriff after you've attempted
[48:36.380 --> 48:43.060]  to collect directly from whoever you got the ruling against and they have failed to comply,
[48:43.060 --> 48:47.500]  then you can get the sheriff to assist you in collecting.
[48:47.500 --> 48:51.140]  Good, good.
[48:51.140 --> 48:53.540]  It sounds like it's a bit of a process.
[48:53.540 --> 48:55.780]  It's not like they're going to come up with a check right away.
[48:55.780 --> 48:58.980]  It really depends on who it is.
[48:58.980 --> 49:03.660]  Most places, it really depends on what's going to happen if they don't pay or what the potential
[49:03.660 --> 49:13.020]  would be if they don't pay, but you need to get an enforcement order from a judge after
[49:13.020 --> 49:18.540]  you get the judgment, but that will be after you've attempted to collect and they have
[49:18.540 --> 49:23.740]  failed to comply, you get the enforcement order and then you take that order to the
[49:23.740 --> 49:28.580]  sheriff and say, okay, I need you to get me some people and I'm going to go foreclose
[49:28.580 --> 49:33.300]  or I'm going to go seize property in association with this order.
[49:33.300 --> 49:34.300]  Okay.
[49:34.300 --> 49:38.620]  All right, Eddie, last question, last question.
[49:38.620 --> 49:43.940]  I'm the plaintiff, let's say.
[49:43.940 --> 49:45.980]  In what kind of case?
[49:45.980 --> 49:49.100]  J.P. Case, okay?
[49:49.100 --> 49:50.100]  Okay.
[49:50.100 --> 49:53.340]  I'm the defendant.
[49:53.340 --> 49:55.860]  Are you the plaintiff or the defendant?
[49:55.860 --> 49:58.220]  I'm the plaintiff.
[49:58.220 --> 50:07.380]  Can I have a friend come in and put me on the stand and ask me questions?
[50:07.380 --> 50:11.540]  You can take the stand and basically just talk.
[50:11.540 --> 50:14.180]  You don't need a friend to ask you questions.
[50:14.180 --> 50:16.900]  You can ask yourself the questions basically.
[50:16.900 --> 50:17.900]  Okay.
[50:17.900 --> 50:19.420]  All right.
[50:19.420 --> 50:25.700]  But remember, anything you get on the stand and say, the other side gets to cross examine
[50:25.700 --> 50:26.700]  you on.
[50:26.700 --> 50:27.700]  Okay.
[50:27.700 --> 50:28.700]  Of course.
[50:28.700 --> 50:29.700]  Of course.
[50:29.700 --> 50:30.700]  Eddie, thank you very much.
[50:30.700 --> 50:31.700]  Thank you.
[50:31.700 --> 50:32.700]  You're welcome.
[50:32.700 --> 50:33.700]  Thank you.
[50:33.700 --> 50:34.700]  Have a good night.
[50:34.700 --> 50:35.700]  All right.
[50:35.700 --> 50:36.700]  Now, okay.
[50:36.700 --> 50:37.700]  Now, back again.
[50:37.700 --> 50:38.700]  All right.
[50:38.700 --> 50:39.700]  Now we have Truth Raider.
[50:39.700 --> 50:40.700]  Raider, what can we do for you?
[50:40.700 --> 50:41.700]  Happy New Year, Eddie.
[50:41.700 --> 50:42.700]  Happy New Year.
[50:42.700 --> 50:43.700]  A couple of things to thank you.
[50:43.700 --> 50:44.700]  There's a couple of things just to touch on briefly and then I'll move on.
[50:44.700 --> 50:45.700]  Let you kids have a good night.
[50:45.700 --> 50:46.700]  Thank you.
[50:46.700 --> 50:47.700]  Thank you.
[50:47.700 --> 50:48.700]  Thank you.
[50:48.700 --> 50:49.700]  Thank you.
[50:49.700 --> 50:50.700]  Thank you.
[50:50.700 --> 50:57.820]  A couple of things just to touch on briefly and then I'll move on, let you kids have a
[50:57.820 --> 50:58.820]  good night.
[50:58.820 --> 50:59.820]  The color board is full apparently.
[50:59.820 --> 51:00.820]  Yes, it is.
[51:00.820 --> 51:01.820]  Yes.
[51:01.820 --> 51:07.980]  This information is starting to spread like wildfire and hopefully continues and we'll
[51:07.980 --> 51:13.220]  win this fight eventually, but it's going to be a long time before we do.
[51:13.220 --> 51:15.020]  I hope not, but briefly.
[51:15.020 --> 51:16.020]  Let's see.
[51:16.020 --> 51:17.020]  Yeah.
[51:17.020 --> 51:24.580]  Well, look, everyone I know and everyone I see around me all consider themselves drivers.
[51:24.580 --> 51:26.060]  They all use the term drive.
[51:26.060 --> 51:28.820]  I mean, it's total social conditioning.
[51:28.820 --> 51:29.820]  No.
[51:29.820 --> 51:37.940]  Remember, they are giving it to you in the common English vernacular, not the legal vernacular.
[51:37.940 --> 51:41.020]  Understand that they're not misapplying the term.
[51:41.020 --> 51:44.460]  The court system is the one misapplying the term.
[51:44.460 --> 51:47.220]  The attorneys are the one misapplying the term.
[51:47.220 --> 51:51.700]  The law enforcement is the one misapplying the term.
[51:51.700 --> 51:55.820]  You could call yourself peanut butter and it wouldn't matter.
[51:55.820 --> 51:56.820]  Right.
[51:56.820 --> 51:57.820]  Okay?
[51:57.820 --> 51:58.820]  Yeah.
[51:58.820 --> 52:01.020]  You can say that you were any number of things with the car.
[52:01.020 --> 52:05.300]  It wouldn't matter because you're intending to use it in the common vernacular.
[52:05.300 --> 52:06.900]  They are not.
[52:06.900 --> 52:12.740]  Unless people commonly use the term motor vehicle, then uh-oh, then they got themselves
[52:12.740 --> 52:16.380]  using a legal commercial term.
[52:16.380 --> 52:22.380]  Yes, because motor vehicle only exists within the statutory schemes.
[52:22.380 --> 52:23.380]  Correct.
[52:23.380 --> 52:26.580]  Or at least that was the case.
[52:26.580 --> 52:27.580]  Right.
[52:27.580 --> 52:28.580]  Okay.
[52:28.580 --> 52:31.580]  I'm just making a couple of points here.
[52:31.580 --> 52:35.180]  If this is not really a complaint, but it's something that I haven't heard you say, but
[52:35.180 --> 52:39.780]  maybe you've said it in the past, but I just haven't picked it up.
[52:39.780 --> 52:49.100]  The, it's not prefaced in anything that I've heard of, but this activity for everyone folks
[52:49.100 --> 52:51.820]  is not truly for everybody.
[52:51.820 --> 52:56.900]  I mean it's everyone's birthright to be able to have liberty through locomotion and the
[52:56.900 --> 53:02.540]  right to travel on the roadway with an automobile, but it's not for everyone because not everybody's
[53:02.540 --> 53:07.380]  going to exercise due care and responsibility when they're out there on the roadway.
[53:07.380 --> 53:08.380]  I haven't heard you mention-
[53:08.380 --> 53:12.140]  Well, no, that's like saying someone doesn't have a right to own a gun because they may
[53:12.140 --> 53:14.160]  not exercise due care.
[53:14.160 --> 53:20.060]  The only way that you can take that right away is to prove that they are incapable of
[53:20.060 --> 53:27.860]  exercising due care, such as mentally handicapped, insane, okay?
[53:27.860 --> 53:31.020]  That's the only way you can make that statement and make it validly.
[53:31.020 --> 53:32.020]  Right.
[53:32.020 --> 53:38.780]  Because I get a lot of people, when I introduce this idea to people that this is their birthright,
[53:38.780 --> 53:42.020]  oh, okay, so this is for everybody.
[53:42.020 --> 53:45.900]  Everyone can be on the roadway and we're going to have accidents.
[53:45.900 --> 53:46.900]  People are going to do things-
[53:46.900 --> 53:50.900]  Well, look, I can short-circuit that argument real quick.
[53:50.900 --> 53:58.580]  Go on YouTube, pull up a list of search videos for bad drivers, okay?
[53:58.580 --> 54:04.060]  Does not matter what sex or what country, it is proof positive that the licensing of
[54:04.060 --> 54:08.420]  drivers has nothing to do with public safety.
[54:08.420 --> 54:15.380]  Because after you watch these idiots and how they control a car, there is no way in hell
[54:15.380 --> 54:22.220]  they should have ever gotten a license, but they did.
[54:22.220 --> 54:26.940]  Proof positive, it has nothing to do with public safety.
[54:26.940 --> 54:34.260]  All right, and that's what I'm going to use for people from now on, just to analyze that
[54:34.260 --> 54:39.940]  and to tell them, hey, how did we survive before the licensing period in the first place?
[54:39.940 --> 54:43.100]  Because the system, what they've got is thinking that you go out there on the roadway and if
[54:43.100 --> 54:46.580]  you don't have insurance, oh, you're going to kill somebody, they're going to get to
[54:46.580 --> 54:47.580]  it.
[54:47.580 --> 54:48.580]  It's imminent.
[54:48.580 --> 54:49.580]  It's a fact.
[54:49.580 --> 54:50.580]  You're going to hurt somebody out there.
[54:50.580 --> 54:51.580]  And what are you going to do?
[54:51.580 --> 54:58.100]  Are you going to spend your financial life and future because you didn't insure?
[54:58.100 --> 55:00.860]  I get that kind of an argument from people all the time.
[55:00.860 --> 55:03.340]  Yeah, but that's a presumption.
[55:03.340 --> 55:04.340]  It's a theory.
[55:04.340 --> 55:05.460]  It's not a fact.
[55:05.460 --> 55:07.860]  And that's the part that needs to be shown to them.
[55:07.860 --> 55:09.900]  You are theorizing.
[55:09.900 --> 55:15.860]  Nothing that you're saying can be proven to be factual until such time as it actually happens.
[55:15.860 --> 55:17.540]  And it hasn't happened.
[55:17.540 --> 55:24.580]  So you're operating upon a theory of your own, an opinion of your own, not an actual
[55:24.580 --> 55:25.580]  demonstrable fact.
[55:25.580 --> 55:26.580]  There's cognitive dissonance out there.
[55:26.580 --> 55:32.820]  And that's the other thing I want to touch upon.
[55:32.820 --> 55:34.980]  People are just saying, well, you've got to do this.
[55:34.980 --> 55:36.380]  I don't believe that.
[55:36.380 --> 55:39.780]  If they're for a purpose, we all have to do this for a purpose.
[55:39.780 --> 55:42.620]  We have to register and insure and we have to license.
[55:42.620 --> 55:44.780]  We have to do that.
[55:44.780 --> 55:45.780]  Or Stockholm syndrome.
[55:45.780 --> 55:50.380]  Well, you know, they've got all the weapons, they've got all the guns, they've got the
[55:50.380 --> 55:55.380]  black rose, they've got the badges, you know, they have the technology to collect from us.
[55:55.380 --> 55:59.140]  They can garnish our wages and all this kind of stuff.
[55:59.140 --> 56:02.900]  Okay, well, I got one question for you.
[56:02.900 --> 56:03.900]  Yeah.
[56:03.900 --> 56:06.700]  Was there a question in any of this?
[56:06.700 --> 56:07.700]  Nope.
[56:07.700 --> 56:09.180]  This is just a little commentary.
[56:09.180 --> 56:16.220]  The last thing I want to touch upon is ten consecutive times now, Eddie.
[56:16.220 --> 56:17.860]  Ten consecutive times now what?
[56:17.860 --> 56:18.860]  Cruising down.
[56:18.860 --> 56:19.860]  Gravity's worked?
[56:19.860 --> 56:20.860]  What?
[56:20.860 --> 56:23.980]  Yeah, well, yeah, gravity always works.
[56:23.980 --> 56:26.060]  And then this will start to work too.
[56:26.060 --> 56:30.220]  I was just cruising down the boulevard here, here in my uncle town, and there he was sitting
[56:30.220 --> 56:31.220]  there on the side of me.
[56:31.220 --> 56:37.220]  His SUV is, you know, state issued SUV, and pulled out and went behind me.
[56:37.220 --> 56:41.220]  And then within maybe about, oh, I'd say three to five seconds, he decided to stop, pull
[56:41.220 --> 56:44.460]  back and make a right turn on the very next treaty.
[56:44.460 --> 56:45.460]  He could possibly turn on him.
[56:45.460 --> 56:46.460]  Ten consecutive times.
[56:46.460 --> 56:47.460]  It's working.
[56:47.460 --> 56:48.460]  Good.
[56:48.460 --> 56:55.620]  The thing is, is once you've asserted your rights and shown you know how, and that they
[56:55.620 --> 57:00.940]  don't have a way to get around that, they tend to leave you alone more.
[57:00.940 --> 57:06.980]  They step back, you know, as has been said many times in documentaries, once you stand
[57:06.980 --> 57:11.980]  up against the power, and you know your rights and how to assert them, they tend to, you
[57:11.980 --> 57:16.260]  know, they tend to become afraid of you, and they tend to stand back and step back.
[57:16.260 --> 57:20.300]  Never take it as them being afraid of you.
[57:20.300 --> 57:25.780]  Simply take it as the fact that they know that they are wasting money by doing anything
[57:25.780 --> 57:29.940]  to you, not that they're afraid of you.
[57:29.940 --> 57:33.940]  They're behaving fiscally, not fearfully.
[57:33.940 --> 57:34.940]  Correct.
[57:34.940 --> 57:35.940]  Correct.
[57:35.940 --> 57:41.180]  And on that note, Eddie, that's all I've got for tonight, and God bless, thank you for
[57:41.180 --> 57:42.180]  all your help.
[57:42.180 --> 57:43.940]  I'll call you again and let you know I'll be filing my case.
[57:43.940 --> 57:47.940]  I have to make sure I got everything correct before I do so.
[57:47.940 --> 57:48.940]  Okay.
[57:48.940 --> 57:49.940]  Good luck.
[57:49.940 --> 57:50.940]  All right.
[57:50.940 --> 57:51.940]  All right.
[57:51.940 --> 57:52.940]  Thank you.
[57:52.940 --> 57:53.940]  All right.
[57:53.940 --> 57:54.940]  Have a good one.
[57:54.940 --> 57:55.940]  See you later.
[57:55.940 --> 57:56.940]  All right, folks.
[57:56.940 --> 57:59.060]  We are now at the top of the hour break, so we're going to be going on break here in
[57:59.060 --> 58:05.380]  just about 45 seconds for a full four minutes, so that gives me time to catch my breath
[58:05.380 --> 58:10.660]  and you time to adjust the cotton in your ears from my volume levels.
[58:10.660 --> 58:14.620]  But in the meantime, all the callers up on the board, you all hang in there, and I will
[58:14.620 --> 58:17.900]  pick you up on the other side of the break and continue answering your calls, the best
[58:17.900 --> 58:19.220]  of my ability.
[58:19.220 --> 58:22.900]  And if you have not called in and gotten in line yet and you have a question or a comment,
[58:22.900 --> 58:25.900]  especially if you have the seminar material and want to let folks know how appreciative
[58:25.900 --> 58:33.860]  you are and how useful it is, then please give us a call, 512-646-1984, and go to the
[58:33.860 --> 58:39.780]  homepage, logosradionetwork.com, and look at the info on the top left in the big box
[58:39.780 --> 58:41.140]  about the fundraiser.
[58:41.140 --> 58:42.940]  Please donate wherever you can.
[58:42.940 --> 58:50.300]  We'll be right back, so you all hang in there.
[58:50.300 --> 58:55.740]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.740 --> 58:58.540]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.540 --> 59:03.940]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:03.940 --> 59:07.180]  the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.180 --> 59:08.900]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.900 --> 59:14.860]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.860 --> 59:18.620]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.620 --> 59:23.580]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.580 --> 59:28.300]  into the riches of the Word beyond which you have ever experienced before.
[59:28.300 --> 59:33.460]  Those from America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.460 --> 59:43.900]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102,
[59:43.900 --> 59:47.940]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.940 --> 59:48.940]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:48.940 --> 01:00:00.820]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.820 --> 01:00:05.380]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:05.380 --> 01:00:11.540]  Markets for Friday, 3rd of February 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,220.04 an
[01:00:11.540 --> 01:00:18.700]  ounce, silver at $17.15 an ounce, Texas crude at $53.54 a barrel, and bitcoin broke a thousand
[01:00:18.700 --> 01:00:24.300]  and is currently sitting at about 1,017 U.S. currency.
[01:00:24.300 --> 01:00:30.300]  Today in history, year 1918, the Twin Peaks Tunnel in San Francisco, California begins
[01:00:30.300 --> 01:00:38.980]  service as the longest streetcar tunnel in the world, over two miles long, today in history.
[01:00:38.980 --> 01:00:43.460]  In recent news, European Union leaders held a summit on the island of Malta Friday today
[01:00:43.460 --> 01:00:47.140]  in order to find effective ways in curtailing the smuggling of hundreds of thousands of
[01:00:47.140 --> 01:00:50.700]  refugees from North Africa into the European Union.
[01:00:50.700 --> 01:00:54.700]  These refugees sail across the Mediterranean via Libya's shorelines on boats which are
[01:00:54.700 --> 01:00:58.900]  overloaded in fluency condition, resulting in capsizing and the drowning of thousands
[01:00:58.900 --> 01:00:59.900]  of lives.
[01:00:59.900 --> 01:01:05.780]  It is estimated that roughly at least 5,083 refugees died from drowning last year alone.
[01:01:05.780 --> 01:01:10.380]  Italian Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni told reporters that, quote, naturally we're hoping
[01:01:10.380 --> 01:01:11.460]  for results.
[01:01:11.460 --> 01:01:15.660]  There won't be any miracles, but better management and reduction of illegal migrants are what
[01:01:15.660 --> 01:01:17.220]  we are working towards.
[01:01:17.220 --> 01:01:21.540]  An aid and cooperation deal was signed Thursday between Italy and Libyan Prime Minister Faiz
[01:01:21.540 --> 01:01:22.540]  Sarraj.
[01:01:22.540 --> 01:01:24.740]  However, not everyone is hopeful.
[01:01:24.740 --> 01:01:30.180]  Doctors Without Borders Director General Arjan Heckenkamp said that the EU's plan shows
[01:01:30.180 --> 01:01:35.140]  that it is, quote, delusional about just how dangerous the situation in Libya really is.
[01:01:35.140 --> 01:01:40.420]  A problem the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zayed Rahad al-Hussein, has noted
[01:01:40.420 --> 01:01:44.780]  that sending people back to countries where they may face torture, persecution, or threats
[01:01:44.780 --> 01:01:49.740]  to their lives puts into doubt the cornerstone of international human rights and refugee
[01:01:49.740 --> 01:01:52.540]  laws.
[01:01:52.540 --> 01:01:56.980]  A day after National Security Advisor Michael Flynn on Wednesday stated at a press conference
[01:01:56.980 --> 01:02:01.620]  that the U.S. is, quote, officially putting Iran on notice since recent Iranian actions,
[01:02:01.620 --> 01:02:05.620]  including a provocative ballistic missile launch and an attack against a Saudi naval
[01:02:05.620 --> 01:02:09.980]  vessel conducted by Iran-supported Houthi militants, underscore what should have been
[01:02:09.980 --> 01:02:14.860]  clear in the international community all along about Iran's destabilizing behavior across
[01:02:14.860 --> 01:02:18.780]  the Middle East, White House Press Secretary and Communications Director Sean Spicer at
[01:02:18.780 --> 01:02:23.060]  Thursday's press briefing stated that, quote, I think General Flynn was really clear yesterday
[01:02:23.060 --> 01:02:27.140]  that Iran has violated the joint resolution and that Iran's additional hostile actions
[01:02:27.140 --> 01:02:31.480]  that it took against our navy vessel are ones that we are very clear are not going to sit
[01:02:31.480 --> 01:02:32.820]  by and take it.
[01:02:32.820 --> 01:02:37.020]  When interjected by the press, Spicer corrected his statement to a Saudi vessel but didn't
[01:02:37.020 --> 01:02:39.940]  address his false Iranian claims of affiliation.
[01:02:39.940 --> 01:02:44.120]  We hope and pray that this isn't an attempt at another Gulf of Tonkin-like scenario in
[01:02:44.120 --> 01:02:48.340]  order to ratchet up a war effort with the last nation General Wesley Clark revealed
[01:02:48.340 --> 01:02:52.860]  that the Bush Department of Defense was determined in invading Iran.
[01:02:52.860 --> 01:03:21.340]  This is Rick Brody with your Lowdown for February 3rd, 2017.
[01:03:23.860 --> 01:03:51.340]  We came from the West Virginia coal mines and the rocky mountains and the western skies
[01:03:51.340 --> 01:04:02.100]  and the desert.
[01:04:02.100 --> 01:04:04.300]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:04:04.300 --> 01:04:07.660]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:04:07.660 --> 01:04:11.260]  And now we have on the caller board, Brett in Texas.
[01:04:11.260 --> 01:04:12.980]  Brett, what can we do for you?
[01:04:12.980 --> 01:04:13.980]  Eddie, hello there.
[01:04:13.980 --> 01:04:14.980]  Hello.
[01:04:14.980 --> 01:04:15.980]  I had a very exciting day today.
[01:04:15.980 --> 01:04:16.980]  Really?
[01:04:16.980 --> 01:04:17.980]  How so?
[01:04:17.980 --> 01:04:26.500]  In traffic court, just the way everybody wants to have an exciting day, right?
[01:04:26.500 --> 01:04:27.500]  Yeah.
[01:04:27.500 --> 01:04:33.060]  Well, apparently, filing motions in your case that makes the judge and the prosecutor look
[01:04:33.060 --> 01:04:36.220]  bad, they tend to not get real happy with you.
[01:04:36.220 --> 01:04:39.780]  That's definitely the way it works.
[01:04:39.780 --> 01:04:42.780]  They don't like being outsmarted at their own game.
[01:04:42.780 --> 01:04:44.780]  Oh, my goodness.
[01:04:44.780 --> 01:04:50.180]  But these fellows today, it felt like a showdown.
[01:04:50.180 --> 01:04:52.700]  I didn't even, I wasn't trying to be rude or anything.
[01:04:52.700 --> 01:04:56.540]  I kind of actually thought that the judge was going to, you know, see the tidal wave
[01:04:56.540 --> 01:05:00.620]  coming and maybe throw the prosecutor under the bus and say, yeah, it's all her fault.
[01:05:00.620 --> 01:05:02.140]  You're right and dismissed the case.
[01:05:02.140 --> 01:05:05.260]  But no, he turned up, he says, all right, I read your motions.
[01:05:05.260 --> 01:05:06.260]  They're all denied.
[01:05:06.260 --> 01:05:07.260]  Right.
[01:05:07.260 --> 01:05:09.340]  And that's what they do in every single case.
[01:05:09.340 --> 01:05:13.500]  They never, ever intend to give you a fair trial.
[01:05:13.500 --> 01:05:20.100]  They never, ever give you a legal basis for their refusal to recognize the arguments in
[01:05:20.100 --> 01:05:22.420]  your motions when they deny them.
[01:05:22.420 --> 01:05:26.940]  And the reason for that is because no one filed an answer.
[01:05:26.940 --> 01:05:29.540]  Nobody challenged the facts asserted in your motions.
[01:05:29.540 --> 01:05:31.700]  They never do.
[01:05:31.700 --> 01:05:39.180]  So by what authority does a judge deny an unchallenged statement of facts in relation
[01:05:39.180 --> 01:05:42.180]  to the law unopposed?
[01:05:42.180 --> 01:05:45.220]  Exactly.
[01:05:45.220 --> 01:05:51.460]  That right there is grounds for disqualification because it is proof positive that the judge
[01:05:51.460 --> 01:05:57.660]  is acting in the place of the prosecutor to directly address the merits of your arguments
[01:05:57.660 --> 01:06:03.220]  with no legitimate legal authority behind the denial.
[01:06:03.220 --> 01:06:06.220]  Exactly.
[01:06:06.220 --> 01:06:14.060]  So file a motion to disqualify for failure to provide you with a fair and impartial trial,
[01:06:14.060 --> 01:06:18.820]  denying you access to the courts as is your right.
[01:06:18.820 --> 01:06:23.580]  And also file a motion demanding a finding of a statement.
[01:06:23.580 --> 01:06:24.580]  I'm sorry.
[01:06:24.580 --> 01:06:25.580]  Demanding, yes.
[01:06:25.580 --> 01:06:26.580]  Of?
[01:06:26.580 --> 01:06:27.580]  Findings of facts.
[01:06:27.580 --> 01:06:36.100]  Yeah, findings of facts and conclusions of law on why and by what legal authority he
[01:06:36.100 --> 01:06:37.900]  denied the motions.
[01:06:37.900 --> 01:06:38.900]  Because he can't give you one.
[01:06:38.900 --> 01:06:39.900]  I asked him that today.
[01:06:39.900 --> 01:06:40.900]  Huh?
[01:06:40.900 --> 01:06:41.900]  I asked him that today.
[01:06:41.900 --> 01:06:42.900]  He just got real heated.
[01:06:42.900 --> 01:06:43.900]  Well, of course he got real heated.
[01:06:43.900 --> 01:06:49.260]  He doesn't have an answer for why he denied it, or at least he can't give you the answer
[01:06:49.260 --> 01:06:51.740]  for why he denied it.
[01:06:51.740 --> 01:06:57.700]  I said, are you telling me that I'm not going to have an opportunity to present any argument
[01:06:57.700 --> 01:06:58.700]  for the motions?
[01:06:58.700 --> 01:07:01.700]  He says, no, you're not.
[01:07:01.700 --> 01:07:02.700]  Right.
[01:07:02.700 --> 01:07:04.820]  That right there is proof positive.
[01:07:04.820 --> 01:07:07.300]  That's a disqualifying statement.
[01:07:07.300 --> 01:07:08.300]  Completely disqualifying statement.
[01:07:08.300 --> 01:07:11.300]  It's on the record.
[01:07:11.300 --> 01:07:12.300]  It's on the record.
[01:07:12.300 --> 01:07:13.300]  Yeah.
[01:07:13.300 --> 01:07:14.940]  That's a completely disqualifying statement.
[01:07:14.940 --> 01:07:19.460]  He has just said, I am denying you and your right to put on a defense.
[01:07:19.460 --> 01:07:21.620]  I am denying you access to the court.
[01:07:21.620 --> 01:07:24.820]  I am denying you and your right of due process.
[01:07:24.820 --> 01:07:27.660]  That's exactly what that judge said.
[01:07:27.660 --> 01:07:34.060]  He's getting red in his face, and he leans forward over his little gavel, and he's leaning
[01:07:34.060 --> 01:07:39.780]  forward, and he's telling me, I strongly recommend that you go back to the plea bargain, and
[01:07:39.780 --> 01:07:44.420]  you talk with that DA and get yourself a plea bargain, and if I accept your plea of guilty,
[01:07:44.420 --> 01:07:48.060]  then you will be allowed to have a payment plan.
[01:07:48.060 --> 01:07:51.900]  And what you should have said, well, Judge, based upon your reaction and statements just
[01:07:51.900 --> 01:07:57.140]  now, I suggest you recuse yourself, and if you don't, then I'm going to file a motion
[01:07:57.140 --> 01:08:03.860]  to disqualify you and document your judicial indiscretions and complete an utter disregard
[01:08:03.860 --> 01:08:08.020]  for the rule of law and the rights of the individual into that appears in your court.
[01:08:08.020 --> 01:08:09.580]  How's him apples?
[01:08:09.580 --> 01:08:10.580]  Ooh.
[01:08:10.580 --> 01:08:13.140]  Let's make some apple pie, dude.
[01:08:13.140 --> 01:08:14.140]  Yeah.
[01:08:14.140 --> 01:08:15.140]  Wow, yeah.
[01:08:15.140 --> 01:08:17.740]  I wish I had known what to say.
[01:08:17.740 --> 01:08:19.740]  All that kind of stuff would have been great.
[01:08:19.740 --> 01:08:22.220]  See, this is the thing about my class.
[01:08:22.220 --> 01:08:27.420]  The reason people, I think, like my class, and the reason they also don't like my class
[01:08:27.420 --> 01:08:32.900]  is because I've never been as loud and obnoxious as I can get on the radio in class, but my
[01:08:32.900 --> 01:08:38.140]  reasoning for that, I believe, is pretty sound in that if you can contend with me in that
[01:08:38.140 --> 01:08:45.780]  classroom in that setting, these judges and prosecutors are fricking nothing because I
[01:08:45.780 --> 01:08:50.820]  will give you a way harder time and a way more malicious treatment than they will to
[01:08:50.820 --> 01:08:51.820]  toughen you up.
[01:08:51.820 --> 01:08:52.820]  Great.
[01:08:52.820 --> 01:08:53.820]  It's kind of like Marine boot camp.
[01:08:53.820 --> 01:08:54.820]  So how does that work, actually?
[01:08:54.820 --> 01:08:55.820]  Which part?
[01:08:55.820 --> 01:09:00.820]  I mean, you have these to go and do something with you.
[01:09:00.820 --> 01:09:01.820]  Do you have something?
[01:09:01.820 --> 01:09:06.540]  I have classes I teach every Sunday from two to five at Brave New Books, 1904 Guadalupe
[01:09:06.540 --> 01:09:09.460]  Street down in Brave New Books.
[01:09:09.460 --> 01:09:16.420]  And the first class is free and it's $20 for each class thereafter.
[01:09:16.420 --> 01:09:17.700]  Every Sunday afternoon.
[01:09:17.700 --> 01:09:24.580]  Every Sunday, unless the bookstore is closed or I'm dead.
[01:09:24.580 --> 01:09:29.220]  And then I'm ornery enough that if you seance, I'll probably show up anyway.
[01:09:29.220 --> 01:09:32.140]  So tell me something.
[01:09:32.140 --> 01:09:33.140]  Something.
[01:09:33.140 --> 01:09:39.740]  I did get one good thing out of this exciting day today, even though they denied everything.
[01:09:39.740 --> 01:09:48.780]  I got a request for production after 40 something days, they finally barely partially complied
[01:09:48.780 --> 01:09:51.080]  and they gave me some evidence.
[01:09:51.080 --> 01:09:53.740]  They gave me a complaint and an information.
[01:09:53.740 --> 01:09:56.980]  Which were signed when?
[01:09:56.980 --> 01:10:05.340]  About 65 days after they let me out of their incarceration, the cop that said I was driving
[01:10:05.340 --> 01:10:09.780]  without a license or driving while license invalid, he threw me in the clink and then
[01:10:09.780 --> 01:10:13.060]  the next day they let me out.
[01:10:13.060 --> 01:10:14.060]  And okay.
[01:10:14.060 --> 01:10:16.620]  He did not take you before a magistrate, right?
[01:10:16.620 --> 01:10:17.620]  Right.
[01:10:17.620 --> 01:10:20.980]  Did you demand to be taken before a magistrate?
[01:10:20.980 --> 01:10:22.620]  I just told him he's supposed to.
[01:10:22.620 --> 01:10:23.620]  Okay.
[01:10:23.620 --> 01:10:24.620]  That's all you got to do.
[01:10:24.620 --> 01:10:25.860]  Now you have a lawsuit.
[01:10:25.860 --> 01:10:29.700]  Right now you don't have to wait for anything else because it's a completely separate issue.
[01:10:29.700 --> 01:10:34.180]  You have a lawsuit against that officer for false imprisonment.
[01:10:34.180 --> 01:10:37.340]  Texas case law is very, very clear on that.
[01:10:37.340 --> 01:10:40.860]  He was required to take you before a magistrate unless he had a warrant.
[01:10:40.860 --> 01:10:42.000]  He did not.
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:46.100]  He does not have the authority to take you and put you directly in the jail.
[01:10:46.100 --> 01:10:51.260]  He must take you before the nearest available magistrate.
[01:10:51.260 --> 01:10:52.620]  He didn't do that.
[01:10:52.620 --> 01:10:54.100]  That's false imprisonment.
[01:10:54.100 --> 01:10:57.860]  You have a lawsuit against that cop right now.
[01:10:57.860 --> 01:11:00.340]  I suggest you take advantage of it.
[01:11:00.340 --> 01:11:01.340]  All right.
[01:11:01.340 --> 01:11:02.340]  That sounds good.
[01:11:02.340 --> 01:11:07.180]  I don't have to wait until any- No, they're completely separate issues.
[01:11:07.180 --> 01:11:10.460]  We're talking about a crime by the cop against you.
[01:11:10.460 --> 01:11:11.460]  Cool.
[01:11:11.460 --> 01:11:12.460]  Yeah.
[01:11:12.460 --> 01:11:14.700]  I thought I had to wait until- No, Matt.
[01:11:14.700 --> 01:11:20.380]  You only have to do that to sue him for malicious prosecution.
[01:11:20.380 --> 01:11:25.620]  You have to win or get the case dismissed in your favor, then you can sue the cop again
[01:11:25.620 --> 01:11:28.820]  for malicious prosecution because they're separate issues.
[01:11:28.820 --> 01:11:29.820]  Thank you.
[01:11:29.820 --> 01:11:30.820]  Yes.
[01:11:30.820 --> 01:11:37.740]  Is he going to turn red in the face when he finds out you get to sue him twice?
[01:11:37.740 --> 01:11:44.220]  Just make darn sure that your suit for false imprisonment makes no mention of malicious
[01:11:44.220 --> 01:11:46.220]  prosecution.
[01:11:46.220 --> 01:11:50.060]  Okay.
[01:11:50.060 --> 01:11:56.380]  You deal specifically and only with the facts that you were seized at your liberty without
[01:11:56.380 --> 01:12:02.380]  benefit of a warrant of arrest by officer so-and-so on such-and-such date at such-and-such
[01:12:02.380 --> 01:12:08.660]  time and such-and-such place and immediately removed from that location to the jail located
[01:12:08.660 --> 01:12:17.140]  at blah, blah, blah and named sheriff of whatever county correctional facility or whatever.
[01:12:17.140 --> 01:12:19.300]  And then you get the cop on the stand.
[01:12:19.300 --> 01:12:21.140]  Did you stop me on such-and-such day?
[01:12:21.140 --> 01:12:22.140]  Yes.
[01:12:22.140 --> 01:12:24.260]  Did you place me under arrest on such-and-such day?
[01:12:24.260 --> 01:12:25.260]  Yes.
[01:12:25.260 --> 01:12:27.660]  Did you take me before magistrate on such-and-such day?
[01:12:27.660 --> 01:12:28.660]  No.
[01:12:28.660 --> 01:12:32.180]  Did you take me directly to a jail and have me incarcerated on such-and-such day?
[01:12:32.180 --> 01:12:33.180]  Yes.
[01:12:33.180 --> 01:12:34.740]  Did you have a valid warrant of arrest?
[01:12:34.740 --> 01:12:35.740]  No.
[01:12:35.740 --> 01:12:36.740]  Thank you, Judge.
[01:12:36.740 --> 01:12:37.740]  I'm done.
[01:12:37.740 --> 01:12:43.540]  So is this complicated?
[01:12:43.540 --> 01:12:45.500]  What you just described sounds great for somebody-
[01:12:45.500 --> 01:12:46.500]  No.
[01:12:46.500 --> 01:12:48.260]  That's exactly what you've got to do.
[01:12:48.260 --> 01:12:54.180]  The only thing you have to prove in this case is that an arrest occurred and there was no
[01:12:54.180 --> 01:12:59.260]  warrant and they didn't take you before a magistrate as required by law.
[01:12:59.260 --> 01:13:00.260]  That's it.
[01:13:00.260 --> 01:13:01.260]  It's that simple.
[01:13:01.260 --> 01:13:02.260]  There was a warrant already issued.
[01:13:02.260 --> 01:13:03.260]  Huh?
[01:13:03.260 --> 01:13:04.260]  There was a warrant already issued.
[01:13:04.260 --> 01:13:06.260]  What do you mean there was a warrant already issued?
[01:13:06.260 --> 01:13:09.300]  How could there be a warrant issued before you ever got stopped?
[01:13:09.300 --> 01:13:12.380]  Oh, there have been several times.
[01:13:12.380 --> 01:13:14.740]  This guy that stopped me wasn't deferred.
[01:13:14.740 --> 01:13:15.740]  Okay.
[01:13:15.740 --> 01:13:17.100]  So there was a warrant already-
[01:13:17.100 --> 01:13:19.820]  Did he arrest you based upon that warrant?
[01:13:19.820 --> 01:13:20.820]  No.
[01:13:20.820 --> 01:13:21.820]  Okay, then.
[01:13:21.820 --> 01:13:27.540]  He stopped me and based on what I'm understanding and learning from you, the detention itself
[01:13:27.540 --> 01:13:28.540]  is an arrest.
[01:13:28.540 --> 01:13:29.540]  Yes.
[01:13:29.540 --> 01:13:36.580]  He didn't approach me with any kind of thought that there was a crime or probable cause.
[01:13:36.580 --> 01:13:37.580]  Right.
[01:13:37.580 --> 01:13:40.500]  No probable cause and they never have it.
[01:13:40.500 --> 01:13:45.500]  So then later on, I didn't ever produce a driver's license, but I guess he figured it
[01:13:45.500 --> 01:13:50.580]  out looking stuff up in his computer because I did tell him my name, but he went back and
[01:13:50.580 --> 01:13:54.180]  he was looking stuff up and they eventually decided they were going to take me in based
[01:13:54.180 --> 01:13:57.580]  on something in their computer about driving with license and valid.
[01:13:57.580 --> 01:13:59.580]  But they didn't tell you what?
[01:13:59.580 --> 01:14:00.580]  No.
[01:14:00.580 --> 01:14:01.580]  Okay.
[01:14:01.580 --> 01:14:02.580]  So-
[01:14:02.580 --> 01:14:03.580]  It wasn't even until the next-
[01:14:03.580 --> 01:14:07.580]  What you need then is to get a copy of the police report and see if they make any mention
[01:14:07.580 --> 01:14:13.700]  of the arrest being related to an outstanding warrant, because if it doesn't mention an
[01:14:13.700 --> 01:14:16.500]  outstanding warrant, he's done.
[01:14:16.500 --> 01:14:18.740]  Okay.
[01:14:18.740 --> 01:14:23.260]  And he can't come back after the fact and say, well, we did it based upon a warrant.
[01:14:23.260 --> 01:14:24.260]  No, you didn't.
[01:14:24.260 --> 01:14:25.260]  Here's your police report.
[01:14:25.260 --> 01:14:29.540]  It makes absolutely no mention of a warrant.
[01:14:29.540 --> 01:14:32.940]  Absolutely none.
[01:14:32.940 --> 01:14:38.620]  So check it and make sure that if it doesn't, he's cooked if you go after him.
[01:14:38.620 --> 01:14:47.580]  Yeah, it says on his police report, he says, I ran the information through dispatch and
[01:14:47.580 --> 01:14:51.220]  would have advised that he did not have a valid driver's license.
[01:14:51.220 --> 01:14:52.220]  Right.
[01:14:52.220 --> 01:14:54.220]  But no warrant is mentioned, right?
[01:14:54.220 --> 01:14:55.220]  Right.
[01:14:55.220 --> 01:14:56.220]  There you go.
[01:14:56.220 --> 01:14:58.260]  Now, here's their problem.
[01:14:58.260 --> 01:14:59.260]  Damn.
[01:14:59.260 --> 01:15:01.780]  Here is their problem.
[01:15:01.780 --> 01:15:09.260]  The Texas statutes and transportation 543.001 makes it very clear that the power to arrest
[01:15:09.260 --> 01:15:18.020]  without warrant is limited specifically to subtitle C offenses only, which encompasses
[01:15:18.020 --> 01:15:23.860]  chapters 541 through 600 of the transportation code.
[01:15:23.860 --> 01:15:31.820]  Driver's licenses, registration, and financial responsibility are not within subtitle C.
[01:15:31.820 --> 01:15:38.740]  Registration and driver's licenses are under subtitle B. Okay?
[01:15:38.740 --> 01:15:45.560]  And the financial responsibility is under subtitle D. They have to have a warrant to
[01:15:45.560 --> 01:15:47.900]  arrest for those offenses.
[01:15:47.900 --> 01:15:49.340]  Why?
[01:15:49.340 --> 01:15:50.340]  Because 543.001...
[01:15:50.340 --> 01:15:55.420]  The beginning? Wouldn't they have to already have that at the beginning?
[01:15:55.420 --> 01:15:59.940]  Like they walk up to me, they know that it's me, and they're after me.
[01:15:59.940 --> 01:16:04.100]  No, they would have to have probable cause of a crime to come at you in the first place.
[01:16:04.100 --> 01:16:08.740]  They don't have that either, but that's a different issue.
[01:16:08.740 --> 01:16:13.860]  Once he's determined that you committed a crime, he can call in and get a warrant and
[01:16:13.860 --> 01:16:15.460]  arrest you then.
[01:16:15.460 --> 01:16:16.780]  But they didn't do that.
[01:16:16.780 --> 01:16:19.220]  They don't do that.
[01:16:19.220 --> 01:16:22.300]  They seize you without a warrant in the very beginning.
[01:16:22.300 --> 01:16:23.300] ...five days later.
[01:16:23.300 --> 01:16:24.300]  Right.
[01:16:24.300 --> 01:16:28.300]  I see here that it says, the magistrate's determination of probable cause...
[01:16:28.300 --> 01:16:30.100]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:16:30.100 --> 01:16:34.900]  How did the magistrate make an independent determination of probable cause without you
[01:16:34.900 --> 01:16:36.500]  being present?
[01:16:36.500 --> 01:16:38.740]  That's an ex parte communication.
[01:16:38.740 --> 01:16:44.300]  That's an ex parte proceeding in a criminal matter, which is itself a crime.
[01:16:44.300 --> 01:16:47.340]  Hang on just a minute.
[01:16:47.340 --> 01:16:49.340]  We'll cover this on the other side.
[01:16:49.340 --> 01:16:54.740]  All right, folks, as you can see, we have a lot to offer here information-wise.
[01:16:54.740 --> 01:16:57.420]  All you got to do is join in and listen in and call in.
[01:16:57.420 --> 01:16:58.420]  We'll be right back.
[01:16:58.420 --> 01:16:59.420]  Hang on.
[01:16:59.420 --> 01:17:00.420]  I love Logos.
[01:17:00.420 --> 01:17:01.420]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:17:01.420 --> 01:17:02.420]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:17:02.420 --> 01:17:03.420]  I need my truth pick.
[01:17:03.420 --> 01:17:04.420]  I'd be lost without Logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:17:04.420 --> 01:17:05.420]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really
[01:17:05.420 --> 01:17:06.420]  don't have any money.
[01:17:06.420 --> 01:17:20.260]  Because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:17:20.260 --> 01:17:21.260]  How can I help Logos?
[01:17:21.260 --> 01:17:22.260]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:17:22.260 --> 01:17:23.260]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos.
[01:17:23.260 --> 01:17:24.260]  You can order your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:17:24.260 --> 01:17:25.260]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:17:25.260 --> 01:17:26.260]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:17:26.260 --> 01:17:27.260]  Pick on the Amazon logo, and you'll get a free free gift.
[01:17:27.260 --> 01:17:28.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:28.260 --> 01:17:29.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:29.260 --> 01:17:30.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:30.260 --> 01:17:31.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:31.260 --> 01:17:32.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:32.260 --> 01:17:33.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:33.260 --> 01:17:34.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:34.260 --> 01:17:35.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:35.260 --> 01:17:36.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:36.260 --> 01:17:37.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:37.260 --> 01:17:38.260]  Logos.com.
[01:17:38.260 --> 01:17:39.260]  And Book valet.
[01:17:39.260 --> 01:17:42.960]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:42.960 --> 01:17:44.320]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.320 --> 01:17:45.320]  No.
[01:17:45.320 --> 01:17:48.740]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:48.740 --> 01:17:49.740]  No.
[01:17:49.740 --> 01:17:50.740]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:50.740 --> 01:17:51.740]  No.
[01:17:51.740 --> 01:17:52.740]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:52.740 --> 01:17:53.740]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:17:53.740 --> 01:17:55.740]  This is perfect.
[01:17:55.740 --> 01:17:56.740]  Thank you so much.
[01:17:56.740 --> 01:17:57.740]  You're welcome.
[01:17:57.740 --> 01:17:58.740]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:17:58.740 --> 01:18:00.720]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:18:00.720 --> 01:18:02.400]  of nutrition.
[01:18:02.400 --> 01:18:06.400]  our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.400 --> 01:18:09.400]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves,
[01:18:09.400 --> 01:18:11.400]  and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.400 --> 01:18:17.400]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.400 --> 01:18:22.400]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:22.400 --> 01:18:25.400]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.400 --> 01:18:31.400]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.400 --> 01:18:36.400]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor,
[01:18:36.400 --> 01:18:40.400]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.400 --> 01:18:47.400]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.400 --> 01:18:52.400]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.400 --> 01:18:59.400]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:59.400 --> 01:19:10.400]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:10.400 --> 01:19:33.400]  Music
[01:19:33.400 --> 01:19:52.400]  Music
[01:19:52.400 --> 01:19:54.400]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:54.400 --> 01:19:58.400]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Monday night show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:19:58.400 --> 01:20:06.400]  Again, real quick, if you haven't, please go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and in the big box to the top left,
[01:20:06.400 --> 01:20:14.400]  please read up on this year's fundraiser and what we're giving away and what would qualify you to participate.
[01:20:14.400 --> 01:20:22.400]  Remember, this is how we get the majority of our budget for the year as far as keeping this on the air and getting the bills paid.
[01:20:22.400 --> 01:20:29.400]  You've got to admit the total amount of money being asked for by today's standards is a drop in the bucket,
[01:20:29.400 --> 01:20:36.400]  but we still need you to get there, so please keep that in mind and please help us out however you can in that regard.
[01:20:36.400 --> 01:20:39.400]  That being said, let's get back to Brett here real quick.
[01:20:39.400 --> 01:20:47.400]  Alright, Brett, now right there, everything that you're telling me is a disqualifying matter for that judge.
[01:20:47.400 --> 01:20:53.400]  Is the same judge that did this to you today the same one that made this probable cause finding?
[01:20:53.400 --> 01:20:59.400]  No, it's a different, oh yes, it does, it has two different things on there.
[01:20:59.400 --> 01:21:06.400]  One is a deputy, but it has a stamp here that says original signed by and then it has the judge's name.
[01:21:06.400 --> 01:21:08.400]  Same judge.
[01:21:08.400 --> 01:21:12.400]  So it's not his real signature, but it does mention him.
[01:21:12.400 --> 01:21:21.400]  Okay, well then there's another problem. A neutral and detached magistrate is required to make that probable cause finding,
[01:21:21.400 --> 01:21:26.400]  not the one that's going to preside over your trial and railroad you at that time.
[01:21:26.400 --> 01:21:28.400]  What? Really?
[01:21:28.400 --> 01:21:35.400]  Yes, really. How can the same judge that already said, yeah, I find probable cause to believe this guy's completely guilty.
[01:21:35.400 --> 01:21:39.400]  Now I want to preside over his trial and make sure the jury knows it too.
[01:21:39.400 --> 01:21:41.400]  What?
[01:21:41.400 --> 01:21:43.400]  Oh, where do I find that? What kind of?
[01:21:43.400 --> 01:21:46.400]  It's written into the case law.
[01:21:46.400 --> 01:21:53.400]  It's not fair and impartial for the same judge to make two separate determinations in that regard,
[01:21:53.400 --> 01:21:57.400]  especially when they conflict with the right to be presumed innocent.
[01:21:57.400 --> 01:22:05.400]  A probable cause finding by a judge is the judge saying, I don't presume this guy's innocent.
[01:22:05.400 --> 01:22:09.400]  Based upon the facts, I have to presume he probably did this.
[01:22:09.400 --> 01:22:16.400]  And now he's going to sit over the trial and say, I'm fair and impartial.
[01:22:16.400 --> 01:22:22.400]  I presume that you're completely innocent, except for the part where I found you guilty long enough to say we've got to put you on trial.
[01:22:22.400 --> 01:22:26.400]  Anybody else see a problem with that besides me?
[01:22:26.400 --> 01:22:33.400]  Oh, dude. There's something else weird about this. Let me tell you something.
[01:22:33.400 --> 01:22:35.400]  You mean there's more?
[01:22:35.400 --> 01:22:42.400]  There is. So I'm looking at this complaint, this information, the magistrate's determination of probable cause,
[01:22:42.400 --> 01:22:46.400]  and they're all mentioning this fellow that has nothing to do with anything. I don't even know who this guy is.
[01:22:46.400 --> 01:22:48.400]  What do you mean mentions?
[01:22:48.400 --> 01:22:56.400]  Well, it says before me personally appeared this dude who after being by me duly sworn,
[01:22:56.400 --> 01:23:04.400]  he deposes and says I'm under oath, blah, blah, blah. And he's basically swearing out an allegation against me.
[01:23:04.400 --> 01:23:05.400]  Okay. Who is the guy?
[01:23:05.400 --> 01:23:07.400]  He's not the officer.
[01:23:07.400 --> 01:23:11.400]  But is he an officer or is he a clerk of the court?
[01:23:11.400 --> 01:23:14.400]  He might be. I have no idea.
[01:23:14.400 --> 01:23:15.400]  Exactly.
[01:23:15.400 --> 01:23:16.400]  Never heard.
[01:23:16.400 --> 01:23:21.400]  Odds are it's a clerk of the court. Now, is this a municipal or JP court?
[01:23:21.400 --> 01:23:23.400]  It's a county court.
[01:23:23.400 --> 01:23:30.400]  A county. What the hell are you doing in a county court? County courts don't have jurisdiction unless they're charging you with a Class B or higher.
[01:23:30.400 --> 01:23:35.400]  That's what they do. They call it Class B because there was a driving license invalid before.
[01:23:35.400 --> 01:23:37.400]  A conviction or a charge?
[01:23:37.400 --> 01:23:38.400]  A B.
[01:23:38.400 --> 01:23:40.400]  Well, a conviction or a charge?
[01:23:40.400 --> 01:23:42.400]  They called it a conviction.
[01:23:42.400 --> 01:23:46.400]  Have you gone to trial on it?
[01:23:46.400 --> 01:23:48.400]  Not in this area.
[01:23:48.400 --> 01:23:51.400]  Well, wait a minute. What do you mean not in this area?
[01:23:51.400 --> 01:23:54.400]  It was still in Texas.
[01:23:54.400 --> 01:24:01.400]  Okay. That's not my question. The location in Texas is irrelevant. Were you or were you not convicted of it?
[01:24:01.400 --> 01:24:06.400]  Did you go to trial and lose?
[01:24:06.400 --> 01:24:16.400]  Okay. So I guess they say I lost even though I called it a mistrial because the recording equipment was not working.
[01:24:16.400 --> 01:24:20.400]  And I said mistrial and they just pretended like everything didn't happen.
[01:24:20.400 --> 01:24:23.400]  But later on it showed up as guilty.
[01:24:23.400 --> 01:24:25.400]  It showed up as conviction.
[01:24:25.400 --> 01:24:34.400]  Well, wait a minute. You don't get to say what it is. Did you move the court to declare a mistrial on the fact that they had tampered with their own record?
[01:24:34.400 --> 01:24:38.400]  No. Back then I didn't even know about Eddie Craig and traffic seminars.
[01:24:38.400 --> 01:24:42.400]  That's okay. I didn't either, but that's beside the point.
[01:24:42.400 --> 01:24:47.400]  All I knew was there's right and wrong and they're wrong, but I didn't know what to do about it.
[01:24:47.400 --> 01:24:48.400]  Okay.
[01:24:48.400 --> 01:24:51.400]  So no, I didn't move them to do anything. I was just frustrated.
[01:24:51.400 --> 01:24:55.400]  Okay. Was that a municipal or JP court?
[01:24:55.400 --> 01:24:56.400]  That was municipal.
[01:24:56.400 --> 01:25:01.400]  Okay. Then we still have an issue here, lack of jurisdiction.
[01:25:01.400 --> 01:25:03.400]  Okay.
[01:25:03.400 --> 01:25:06.400]  Which municipal court?
[01:25:06.400 --> 01:25:07.400]  Richardson.
[01:25:07.400 --> 01:25:32.400]  Okay. Under Chapter 30 of the Government Code, did the legislature specifically within that code create the City of Richardson Municipal Court by statute, designate its jurisdiction by statute, and set up its organization by statute?
[01:25:32.400 --> 01:25:38.400]  You need to go read Chapter 30 of the Government Code and find out, because here's the problem.
[01:25:38.400 --> 01:25:55.400]  If they did not, and in fact, the Richardson Municipal Court exists because of a city ordinance, which is what they generally authorized at the top of Chapter 30 for Courts of Record.
[01:25:55.400 --> 01:26:22.400]  And they allowed the municipality to set the jurisdiction through ordinance and allowed the municipality to set the organization of the court by ordinance, then the court is unconstitutional under Article 3, Section 1, which clearly states the legislature is the only one that has the power to create a court,
[01:26:22.400 --> 01:26:26.400]  set its organization, and its jurisdiction.
[01:26:26.400 --> 01:26:30.400]  It cannot delegate that power.
[01:26:30.400 --> 01:26:39.400]  And I have a 1921 Court of Criminal Appeals case that says exactly that, that has never been overturned.
[01:26:39.400 --> 01:26:48.400]  In fact, since the day it was ruled upon, it was never mentioned again.
[01:26:48.400 --> 01:26:54.400]  Now why do you think that is?
[01:26:54.400 --> 01:26:58.400]  Never mentioned again, probably because there's so many things that are in conflict with that.
[01:26:58.400 --> 01:27:04.400]  Exactly, their ability to steal from the public through fraud.
[01:27:04.400 --> 01:27:13.400]  We can't let people know that this case exists because they could use it to prevent us from stealing all this money from them.
[01:27:13.400 --> 01:27:17.400]  There goes our revenue stream. We can't buy any new squad cars.
[01:27:17.400 --> 01:27:26.400]  Yeah, but look and think at all the money they're going to save without these crooked judges and city attorneys on the payroll.
[01:27:26.400 --> 01:27:33.400]  I can't steal millions of dollars, but I'm not having to pay out hundreds of thousands to a few million dollars.
[01:27:33.400 --> 01:27:42.400]  This is once again a clear indication that this has nothing at all to do with public safety.
[01:27:42.400 --> 01:27:54.400]  It is nothing. It is about the fricking money. It always has been.
[01:27:54.400 --> 01:27:59.400]  So right now I'd be getting rid of this judge, and I would use everything this judge has said
[01:27:59.400 --> 01:28:06.400]  and every document in my possession that proves they've done exactly the things they're not supposed to do to get rid of them
[01:28:06.400 --> 01:28:11.400]  and have it declared that this thing is unprosecutable.
[01:28:11.400 --> 01:28:18.400]  These rights violations cannot be resolved. They cannot be resolved.
[01:28:18.400 --> 01:28:26.400]  They cannot unring that bell just by giving you a different judge.
[01:28:26.400 --> 01:28:28.400]  Are you talking about due process violations?
[01:28:28.400 --> 01:28:30.400]  Yes.
[01:28:30.400 --> 01:28:34.400]  Okay.
[01:28:34.400 --> 01:28:39.400]  Okay, cool. I don't have any idea how to do that, but is that something that's in your material?
[01:28:39.400 --> 01:28:41.400]  Because I just purchased it.
[01:28:41.400 --> 01:28:46.400]  Yeah, there's a motion to disqualify a judge in there for sure. Several, in fact.
[01:28:46.400 --> 01:28:51.400]  Cool. Well, I'm looking forward to that.
[01:28:51.400 --> 01:28:52.400]  All right.
[01:28:52.400 --> 01:28:54.400]  I feel like a Christmas package.
[01:28:54.400 --> 01:28:58.400]  Okay. Now, if any of you that have recently purchased a seminar material,
[01:28:58.400 --> 01:29:05.400]  if you have not sent me the email that Deborah replies back to you with after the purchase to get the updated documents,
[01:29:05.400 --> 01:29:12.400]  you need to do that. Follow the instructions and documents she gave you to forward that receipt to me
[01:29:12.400 --> 01:29:19.400]  so that I can verify and thus email you the updated set of documents.
[01:29:19.400 --> 01:29:23.400]  So if you haven't done that and gotten them from me, then please do so.
[01:29:23.400 --> 01:29:27.400]  And that's anyone else out there that's recently purchased the material as well.
[01:29:27.400 --> 01:29:31.400]  If you have been a while and not updated and you have the material,
[01:29:31.400 --> 01:29:36.400]  then make sure that you send me a copy of the original email that you got when you purchased it,
[01:29:36.400 --> 01:29:40.400]  and I will be happy to email you the updates as well.
[01:29:40.400 --> 01:29:43.400]  Okay?
[01:29:43.400 --> 01:29:44.400]  Great.
[01:29:44.400 --> 01:29:47.400]  All right, Brett. You got anything else?
[01:29:47.400 --> 01:29:48.400]  Thanks, Ben.
[01:29:48.400 --> 01:29:50.400]  All right. No problem.
[01:29:50.400 --> 01:29:52.400]  All right. Thanks for calling in.
[01:29:52.400 --> 01:29:55.400]  All right. Now, when we get back, we'll take the rest of the callers on the board.
[01:29:55.400 --> 01:30:02.400]  If there's anything in there, we will be right back after this break.
[01:30:02.400 --> 01:30:06.400]  Ug. Folks hate Monday because it means the start of another work week.
[01:30:06.400 --> 01:30:11.400]  But there's one activity you can start on Monday that's likely to be a smashing success.
[01:30:11.400 --> 01:30:15.400]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back to tell you what it is.
[01:30:15.400 --> 01:30:17.400]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.400 --> 01:30:21.400]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.400 --> 01:30:25.400]  Once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.400 --> 01:30:27.400]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:27.400 --> 01:30:31.400]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.400 --> 01:30:33.400]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.400 --> 01:30:37.400]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:37.400 --> 01:30:41.400]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.400 --> 01:30:44.400]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.400 --> 01:30:49.400]  Monday's diet is full of grace, but Tuesday's diet could be a disgrace.
[01:30:49.400 --> 01:30:53.400]  A study in Britain shows that people who started dieting on a Tuesday
[01:30:53.400 --> 01:30:56.400]  were the most likely to lose their resolve within a week
[01:30:56.400 --> 01:30:58.400]  and end up heavier than when they started.
[01:30:58.400 --> 01:31:00.400]  Friday was another bad weight loss day.
[01:31:00.400 --> 01:31:04.400]  More than half of the 2,000 people surveyed ditched their diets on Friday
[01:31:04.400 --> 01:31:06.400]  after a stressful week at work.
[01:31:06.400 --> 01:31:08.400]  What were the good dieting days?
[01:31:08.400 --> 01:31:12.400]  People who started their diets on Sunday and Monday were far more likely
[01:31:12.400 --> 01:31:15.400]  to shed the most weight and keep the weight off.
[01:31:15.400 --> 01:31:20.400]  So maybe Fleetwood Mac had it right when they sang, Monday morning you sure looked fine.
[01:31:20.400 --> 01:31:30.400]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.400 --> 01:31:36.400]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.400 --> 01:31:38.400]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.400 --> 01:31:43.400]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.400 --> 01:31:46.400]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.400 --> 01:31:49.400]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.400 --> 01:31:50.400]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.400 --> 01:31:51.400]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.400 --> 01:31:52.400]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[01:31:52.400 --> 01:31:53.400]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.400 --> 01:31:55.400]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.400 --> 01:31:58.400]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.400 --> 01:32:01.400]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.400 --> 01:32:03.400]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.400 --> 01:32:06.400]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.400 --> 01:32:09.400]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails,
[01:32:09.400 --> 01:32:11.400]  but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.400 --> 01:32:14.400]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.400 --> 01:32:17.400]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements
[01:32:17.400 --> 01:32:21.400]  can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.400 --> 01:32:22.400]  And we accept Bitcoin.
[01:32:22.400 --> 01:32:26.400]  As a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints,
[01:32:26.400 --> 01:32:32.400]  you can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.400 --> 01:32:38.400]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.400 --> 01:32:42.400]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100
[01:32:42.400 --> 01:32:45.400]  to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.400 --> 01:32:50.400]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.400 --> 01:32:56.400]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.400 --> 01:32:58.400]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.400 --> 01:33:01.400]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.400 --> 01:33:11.400]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradio.com.
[01:33:31.400 --> 01:33:43.400]  Look at them yo-yos, that's the way you do it.
[01:33:43.400 --> 01:33:47.400]  You play the guitar on the MTV.
[01:33:47.400 --> 01:33:50.400]  That ain't working, that's the way you do it.
[01:33:50.400 --> 01:33:54.400]  Money for nothing, you're too free.
[01:33:54.400 --> 01:33:58.400]  That ain't working, that's the way you do it.
[01:33:58.400 --> 01:34:03.400]  Yeah, you're damn straight that ain't working.
[01:34:03.400 --> 01:34:08.400]  Ain't nothing that we have in the system as it exists working.
[01:34:08.400 --> 01:34:11.400]  Nothing at all, okay?
[01:34:11.400 --> 01:34:20.400]  And that, again, is because we have not taken control of our government.
[01:34:20.400 --> 01:34:23.400]  We've lost it, and we're doing nothing to get it back.
[01:34:23.400 --> 01:34:26.400]  We're whining about it, but we're not really doing anything about it.
[01:34:26.400 --> 01:34:32.400]  We're keep waiting on someone else to step forward and take that risk and make that change.
[01:34:32.400 --> 01:34:34.400]  It isn't going to work that way anymore, folks.
[01:34:34.400 --> 01:34:36.400]  This is not the Revolutionary War.
[01:34:36.400 --> 01:34:45.400]  This is not where the government is separate, sparse, and as disorganized as it once was.
[01:34:45.400 --> 01:34:50.400]  Now we have instant communication, but so do we, all right?
[01:34:50.400 --> 01:34:56.400]  We just have to get better organized and have better plans of action and ways to address this
[01:34:56.400 --> 01:35:00.400]  before it comes down to something worse than argument.
[01:35:00.400 --> 01:35:04.400]  All right, that being said, let's go to John in Texas.
[01:35:04.400 --> 01:35:07.400]  John, what can we do for you?
[01:35:07.400 --> 01:35:10.400]  Yeah, I've got a...
[01:35:10.400 --> 01:35:15.400]  It's hypothetical for now, but I'm expecting the judges screw up at some point.
[01:35:15.400 --> 01:35:19.400]  So I want to see about getting them recused and...
[01:35:19.400 --> 01:35:22.400]  No, you want to see about getting him disqualified.
[01:35:22.400 --> 01:35:25.400]  Remember, there's two ways to get the judge off the bench.
[01:35:25.400 --> 01:35:33.400]  Recusal, which he has to do himself, and can choose to not do, or disqualification,
[01:35:33.400 --> 01:35:37.400]  which he does not have the leeway to determine.
[01:35:37.400 --> 01:35:44.400]  Some other judge must make the determination as to whether or not he can be disqualified for whatever reason.
[01:35:44.400 --> 01:35:48.400]  Okay, that's what I was trying to figure out.
[01:35:48.400 --> 01:35:51.400]  Who would I send that to?
[01:35:51.400 --> 01:35:55.400]  You file it in whatever court you're talking about.
[01:35:55.400 --> 01:35:59.400]  Okay, so I would go to the clerk?
[01:35:59.400 --> 01:36:07.400]  You would file it with the clerk of the court in whatever court you're trying to get rid of the judge where your case is, okay?
[01:36:07.400 --> 01:36:08.400]  All right.
[01:36:08.400 --> 01:36:13.400]  And then just to be sure that things are handled properly, you give them a little bit of time,
[01:36:13.400 --> 01:36:22.400]  and then you contact the clerk and see whether or not that motion to disqualify was forwarded to the head administrative judge of the district.
[01:36:22.400 --> 01:36:24.400]  Okay.
[01:36:24.400 --> 01:36:29.400]  Because that's what's required to happen.
[01:36:29.400 --> 01:36:32.400]  What are you talking about time? Are you talking 10 days or what?
[01:36:32.400 --> 01:36:37.400]  No, three or four days, because they're supposed to stop everything immediately and forward that motion.
[01:36:37.400 --> 01:36:40.400]  So give them two, three, four days tops.
[01:36:40.400 --> 01:36:42.400]  All right.
[01:36:42.400 --> 01:36:45.400]  Okay.
[01:36:45.400 --> 01:36:50.400]  Due process is the best one, right, the best reason to have them accused.
[01:36:50.400 --> 01:36:52.400]  Say that again.
[01:36:52.400 --> 01:36:54.400]  Would due process be the best?
[01:36:54.400 --> 01:36:56.400]  Well, it depends on what you're calling due process.
[01:36:56.400 --> 01:37:02.400]  Certain due process issues can be addressed and can only be addressed on appeal.
[01:37:02.400 --> 01:37:05.400]  Other ones, they cannot.
[01:37:05.400 --> 01:37:18.400]  So, for instance, if the judge sat up on the bench in open court and called you a dirty lowdown SOB that he was going to hang from the highest tree after you're convicted, yeah, that one ain't going away.
[01:37:18.400 --> 01:37:19.400]  He's gone.
[01:37:19.400 --> 01:37:20.400]  Yes.
[01:37:20.400 --> 01:37:21.400]  Okay?
[01:37:21.400 --> 01:37:22.400]  Yes.
[01:37:22.400 --> 01:37:34.400]  But if he sits there and goes, well, your motions are denied and here's the basic reasons for why I'm doing it, or he doesn't tell you why he's doing it and won't tell you why he's doing it, but you know it's a violation of your rights,
[01:37:34.400 --> 01:37:38.400]  that one you're going to have to take up on appeal.
[01:37:38.400 --> 01:37:39.400]  Okay.
[01:37:39.400 --> 01:37:44.400]  Well, this is for a trial de novo that I'm working on right now.
[01:37:44.400 --> 01:37:46.400]  And it's a traffic ticket.
[01:37:46.400 --> 01:37:47.400]  Okay.
[01:37:47.400 --> 01:38:00.400]  Well, the issue with a trial de novo is their failure to address the due process violations perpetrated by the lower court because they never, ever look at what occurred at the lower court.
[01:38:00.400 --> 01:38:14.400]  They do everything as if it's brand new when in fact it cannot be brand new because that means that the lower court's due process violations are never addressed, ever, and they keep doing it to everybody that goes through there.
[01:38:14.400 --> 01:38:18.400]  That's an egregious violation on its face.
[01:38:18.400 --> 01:38:31.400]  In my opinion, trial de novos should be completely outlawed, and every single court must be a court of record.
[01:38:31.400 --> 01:38:33.400]  Agreed.
[01:38:33.400 --> 01:38:43.400]  But that's not happening yet because we still have morons in charge of everything, including and especially the courts.
[01:38:43.400 --> 01:38:48.400]  Yeah, I'm finding that out.
[01:38:48.400 --> 01:38:51.400]  Let me ask you this.
[01:38:51.400 --> 01:39:05.400]  Would it be a bad move if I recognize something like in a hearing to just ask the judge to recuse himself or would it just be better to just wait and go ahead and send that?
[01:39:05.400 --> 01:39:06.400]  You can ask.
[01:39:06.400 --> 01:39:13.400]  Every time you don't ask, you're waving whatever egregious thing the judge did that you feel should have disqualified him. Don't do that.
[01:39:13.400 --> 01:39:19.400]  If you have an opportunity to get rid of a judge that's misbehaving, use it. Do it.
[01:39:19.400 --> 01:39:24.400]  Just make sure you file your recusal request in writing.
[01:39:24.400 --> 01:39:32.400]  Never do it just verbally, not unless it actually is a court of record and you can make darn sure it stays in the record.
[01:39:32.400 --> 01:39:40.400]  Even if you do it verbally on the record, file a motion immediately after the proceeding is concluded.
[01:39:40.400 --> 01:39:43.400]  Go write you one and get it filed.
[01:39:43.400 --> 01:39:45.400]  Okay.
[01:39:45.400 --> 01:39:46.400]  All right.
[01:39:46.400 --> 01:39:50.400]  That makes sense.
[01:39:50.400 --> 01:39:53.400]  Yeah, I think that's pretty much what I was going to try to do.
[01:39:53.400 --> 01:40:03.400]  The thing is, and the JP in this case, the JP was, it was like, it was almost like he was just letting the prosecutor tell him what to do.
[01:40:03.400 --> 01:40:05.400]  That's exactly what they're doing.
[01:40:05.400 --> 01:40:13.400]  The JP and municipal court judges, but especially the JP's, because the JP's rarely are attorneys.
[01:40:13.400 --> 01:40:17.400]  Now in bigger counties like Travis, they almost all are attorneys.
[01:40:17.400 --> 01:40:27.400]  But in most of the rural areas, they're not attorneys, so they look at the prosecutor to hold them by the hand and tell them exactly what the prosecutor wants them to do,
[01:40:27.400 --> 01:40:33.400]  which is why those courts have such egregious records of due process violations.
[01:40:33.400 --> 01:40:45.400]  Because the judge cannot possibly be acting fairly and impartially when he is being directed in every step by the other party.
[01:40:45.400 --> 01:40:50.400]  That's the feeling I got was that he wasn't a lawyer.
[01:40:50.400 --> 01:40:57.400]  And I'm kind of getting this feeling about the new judge, which is kind of what I'm thinking is something's going to happen in court,
[01:40:57.400 --> 01:41:03.400]  and it's going to be so ridiculous that I'm just going to have to ask him to step down.
[01:41:03.400 --> 01:41:06.400]  Well, that's entirely possible.
[01:41:06.400 --> 01:41:08.400]  Okay. All right.
[01:41:08.400 --> 01:41:15.400]  But the easiest way to find out whether or not the judge you've got is an attorney is go to the bar site and put in his name.
[01:41:15.400 --> 01:41:20.400]  If he doesn't come up with a bar license number, then he's not an attorney.
[01:41:20.400 --> 01:41:24.400]  Okay. All right.
[01:41:24.400 --> 01:41:30.400]  In traffic, is there an appeal level after trial de novo?
[01:41:30.400 --> 01:41:37.400]  If the fine assessed is more than $100, yes, you go to the Court of Appeals.
[01:41:37.400 --> 01:41:41.400]  Okay. All right.
[01:41:41.400 --> 01:41:44.400]  That's what I get for talking to the prosecutor, I guess.
[01:41:44.400 --> 01:41:45.400]  He says that will be it.
[01:41:45.400 --> 01:41:48.400]  But okay, that's good.
[01:41:48.400 --> 01:41:49.400]  Yeah, that's a lie.
[01:41:49.400 --> 01:41:59.400]  If the fine assessed is greater than $100, then you have the right of appeal to the Court of Appeals for whatever district you're in.
[01:41:59.400 --> 01:42:03.400]  And judging by your area code here, that would be Travis, right?
[01:42:03.400 --> 01:42:05.400]  So you'd be in one of the...
[01:42:05.400 --> 01:42:14.400]  It's going to be around McQuinnon, so it's around Waco, so it'll be up that way.
[01:42:14.400 --> 01:42:21.400]  Okay. Well, then, yeah, whatever district, Court of Appeals district court is there, that covers that area.
[01:42:21.400 --> 01:42:23.400]  That's where it'll go.
[01:42:23.400 --> 01:42:24.400]  Okay.
[01:42:24.400 --> 01:42:27.400]  Like, for instance, here in Travis, it's the third Court of Appeals.
[01:42:27.400 --> 01:42:40.400]  So up in Waco area, whatever county that is, you'd have to find out what district Court of Appeals that is, because that's where it would go after the trial de novo at the county court at law level.
[01:42:40.400 --> 01:42:46.400]  Good deal. Yeah, that's all good information. I appreciate it, man. I think that's all I need, though.
[01:42:46.400 --> 01:42:48.400]  Okay. Thanks for calling in.
[01:42:48.400 --> 01:42:49.400]  All right. Thank you.
[01:42:49.400 --> 01:43:02.400]  Yep. All right. Now, I've got Alec in North Carolina and George in Texas. George, I heard that you want to talk about the UT police departments or police officers, so hang on just a minute.
[01:43:02.400 --> 01:43:08.400]  I've only got a minute left in this segment, so I will take both of you on the other side and try to get to both of you then.
[01:43:08.400 --> 01:43:13.400]  So please don't drop off or hang up thinking I'm not going to get to you. I'll get to you as quickly as I can.
[01:43:13.400 --> 01:43:16.400]  You're the only two callers I've got left before the end of the show.
[01:43:16.400 --> 01:43:21.400]  So y'all hang in there and I will start my conversations with y'all after this coming break.
[01:43:21.400 --> 01:43:28.400]  Now, folks, as you can see, based upon everything you've heard tonight, the system is screwed.
[01:43:28.400 --> 01:43:38.400]  And worse yet, it is screwing us, okay? And it doesn't care. So how do we fix it?
[01:43:38.400 --> 01:43:46.400]  Well, we have to care and we have to stand up together and we have to say no more.
[01:43:46.400 --> 01:43:54.400]  No more letting these attorneys control every department of our government and especially the judicial system.
[01:43:54.400 --> 01:43:59.400]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after the break. Y'all hang in there.
[01:43:59.400 --> 01:44:04.400]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:04.400 --> 01:44:08.400]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:44:08.400 --> 01:44:14.400]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:44:14.400 --> 01:44:20.400]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:44:20.400 --> 01:44:24.400]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[01:44:24.400 --> 01:44:26.400]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:44:26.400 --> 01:44:28.400]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:44:28.400 --> 01:44:33.400]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.400 --> 01:44:38.400]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.400 --> 01:44:40.400]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:40.400 --> 01:44:49.400]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.400 --> 01:45:00.400]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:00.400 --> 01:45:03.400]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.400 --> 01:45:14.400]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.400 --> 01:45:18.400]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.400 --> 01:45:22.400]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.400 --> 01:45:27.400]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[01:45:27.400 --> 01:45:33.400]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.400 --> 01:45:42.400]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.400 --> 01:45:51.400]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.400 --> 01:46:00.400]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EASY.
[01:46:00.400 --> 01:46:28.400]  Music playing.
[01:46:28.400 --> 01:46:40.400]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:40.400 --> 01:46:49.400]  This is the last segment of the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show, and that song right there was put in this specific segment for a reason.
[01:46:49.400 --> 01:47:05.400]  If you listen to this show long enough and you put into practice what you learn here, you will indeed become bad to the bone when it comes to dealing with these crooked retards that think they know what they're doing,
[01:47:05.400 --> 01:47:16.400]  when in fact we can demonstrate through their own rules and processes that they are utterly freaking clueless.
[01:47:16.400 --> 01:47:20.400]  My rule has been the same ever since I started doing this.
[01:47:20.400 --> 01:47:25.400]  Beat them black and blue with their own damned rule book.
[01:47:25.400 --> 01:47:35.400]  And when I have been more than marginally successful in that venture, and so will you if you apply yourself.
[01:47:35.400 --> 01:47:47.400]  All right, that being said, let's get these last two callers before we are out of time. Alex in North Carolina, what can we do for you?
[01:47:47.400 --> 01:47:51.400]  Hello, Alex in North Carolina.
[01:47:51.400 --> 01:47:52.400]  Hi.
[01:47:52.400 --> 01:47:52.400]  Hi.
[01:47:52.400 --> 01:47:53.400]  Can you hear me?
[01:47:53.400 --> 01:47:54.400]  I can now.
[01:47:54.400 --> 01:47:55.400]  Sorry about that.
[01:47:55.400 --> 01:47:56.400]  Sorry about that.
[01:47:56.400 --> 01:47:57.400]  That's okay.
[01:47:57.400 --> 01:47:58.400]  What do you got?
[01:47:58.400 --> 01:48:01.400]  I'm calling from Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
[01:48:01.400 --> 01:48:02.400]  Fort Bragg.
[01:48:02.400 --> 01:48:03.400]  Military.
[01:48:03.400 --> 01:48:05.400]  Been there, done that.
[01:48:05.400 --> 01:48:06.400]  All right.
[01:48:06.400 --> 01:48:07.400]  The black hole.
[01:48:07.400 --> 01:48:08.400]  Yeah.
[01:48:08.400 --> 01:48:13.400]  Anyway, I know you're from Texas, from Houston, and I appreciate everything that you do.
[01:48:13.400 --> 01:48:14.400]  Well, thanks.
[01:48:14.400 --> 01:48:16.400]  I know it's hard.
[01:48:16.400 --> 01:48:21.400]  But first things first, I got to go through, I live off post slash on post.
[01:48:21.400 --> 01:48:22.400]  Uh-huh.
[01:48:22.400 --> 01:48:26.400]  And we have an access control point at our gate to our neighborhood here in Luna Notes.
[01:48:26.400 --> 01:48:27.400]  Right.
[01:48:27.400 --> 01:48:33.400]  And every time I go through the gate, I get the rigmarole.
[01:48:33.400 --> 01:48:40.400]  And when I PCSed here, my insurance lapsed because USAA screwed up so much stuff, and
[01:48:40.400 --> 01:48:41.400]  my insurance lapsed.
[01:48:41.400 --> 01:48:44.400]  And by doing that, I thought I wasn't able to register.
[01:48:44.400 --> 01:48:49.400]  So we dealt with the insurance, and I understand the argument all the way.
[01:48:49.400 --> 01:48:53.400]  I tried to fight it some when I was in Houston, but when I joined up with the military, I
[01:48:53.400 --> 01:48:57.400]  decided that I was going to deal with it because I didn't know enough about the laws, and I
[01:48:57.400 --> 01:49:00.400]  was just going to play the game for a little bit until I figured out what was going on.
[01:49:00.400 --> 01:49:04.400]  Well, you've got to remember that there's a different set of rules when you're on a
[01:49:04.400 --> 01:49:05.400]  federal installation.
[01:49:05.400 --> 01:49:10.400]  Now, the difference there depends upon whether or not the land upon which it sits was actually
[01:49:10.400 --> 01:49:13.400]  ceded or sold to the federal government.
[01:49:13.400 --> 01:49:16.400]  That changes things, whether it has or it hasn't.
[01:49:16.400 --> 01:49:19.400]  And that's where my question comes in.
[01:49:19.400 --> 01:49:24.400]  That's why I said I don't know enough about Texas, I'm golden here, nothing much.
[01:49:24.400 --> 01:49:25.400]  Yeah.
[01:49:25.400 --> 01:49:31.400]  The best way to do it is go to the land office or to the clerk's office, the county clerk
[01:49:31.400 --> 01:49:36.400]  there, and have them do the research or provide the records that show whether or not the land
[01:49:36.400 --> 01:49:40.400]  Fort Bragg is built on, was ever ceded or sold to the federal government.
[01:49:40.400 --> 01:49:45.400]  The North Carolina Land and Management Office should be able to tell you that, or as should
[01:49:45.400 --> 01:49:46.400]  the county...
[01:49:46.400 --> 01:49:51.400]  I can almost guarantee that we're on that, which is 15 miles away, but yet on post because
[01:49:51.400 --> 01:49:55.400]  it's a newer part of Fort Bragg that they have bought for housing.
[01:49:55.400 --> 01:49:56.400]  Yeah.
[01:49:56.400 --> 01:50:02.400]  Well, leasing the land to build structures is still not the same as transferring land.
[01:50:02.400 --> 01:50:03.400]  Roger.
[01:50:03.400 --> 01:50:04.400]  Roger.
[01:50:04.400 --> 01:50:06.400]  And I understand that completely.
[01:50:06.400 --> 01:50:07.400]  Okay.
[01:50:07.400 --> 01:50:11.400]  However, my question comes in this, and this is kind of two parts, and I'll try to make
[01:50:11.400 --> 01:50:13.400]  it quick because I know somebody else was holding.
[01:50:13.400 --> 01:50:17.400]  I have a registration ticket, United States District Court Violation Notice.
[01:50:17.400 --> 01:50:18.400]  There's no date on it.
[01:50:18.400 --> 01:50:22.400]  They just said call and just deal with it, 180 bucks, whatever.
[01:50:22.400 --> 01:50:28.400]  Now, since my wife has an outstanding red light camera ticket up in Willis, Texas, I
[01:50:28.400 --> 01:50:31.400]  can't do it unless I deal with that, I think.
[01:50:31.400 --> 01:50:32.400]  Okay?
[01:50:32.400 --> 01:50:33.400]  Why?
[01:50:33.400 --> 01:50:35.400]  What does your wife's ticket have to do with your case?
[01:50:35.400 --> 01:50:37.400]  It's her car.
[01:50:37.400 --> 01:50:38.400]  Irrelevant.
[01:50:38.400 --> 01:50:41.400]  What does her ticket have to do with your case?
[01:50:41.400 --> 01:50:45.400]  How do I make that argument, though?
[01:50:45.400 --> 01:50:51.400]  The argument is, what is the nexus between her red light camera ticket and what you're
[01:50:51.400 --> 01:50:52.400]  after me for?
[01:50:52.400 --> 01:50:56.400]  Now, are you saying it's for the registration?
[01:50:56.400 --> 01:51:01.400]  I can't update the registration online because of the red light ticket outstanding.
[01:51:01.400 --> 01:51:02.400]  Oh, yes, you can.
[01:51:02.400 --> 01:51:07.400]  You need to send a notice of court to Willis, Texas, stating that you are going to file
[01:51:07.400 --> 01:51:14.400]  a lawsuit for rights violations because they have no legal authority to interfere with
[01:51:14.400 --> 01:51:19.400]  the registration of a car because of a red light camera ticket.
[01:51:19.400 --> 01:51:23.400]  That is written specifically into the statute.
[01:51:23.400 --> 01:51:30.400]  They cannot prevent you from registering a car because of a red light camera citation.
[01:51:30.400 --> 01:51:34.400]  And if I send that directly to Willis, to the police department there?
[01:51:34.400 --> 01:51:39.400]  You need to send it to the police department and you need to send it to the DMV office
[01:51:39.400 --> 01:51:45.400]  in Willis or wherever it is you registered the car and get them to notify you in writing
[01:51:45.400 --> 01:51:49.400]  whether or not they are denying your registration.
[01:51:49.400 --> 01:51:53.400]  If they do, now you've got a lawsuit.
[01:51:53.400 --> 01:51:55.400]  Completely understood.
[01:51:55.400 --> 01:51:57.400]  So I deal with that on the state level in Texas.
[01:51:57.400 --> 01:51:59.400]  Correct.
[01:51:59.400 --> 01:52:01.400]  All right, Roger, moving on.
[01:52:01.400 --> 01:52:02.400]  Next question.
[01:52:02.400 --> 01:52:07.400]  Dealing with this actual citation, you know, I have to report to my unit.
[01:52:07.400 --> 01:52:08.400]  Right.
[01:52:08.400 --> 01:52:13.400]  Any and all problems that happen under the sun, if I spark money and it goes back to
[01:52:13.400 --> 01:52:15.400]  my unit, it affects my career.
[01:52:15.400 --> 01:52:16.400]  Right.
[01:52:16.400 --> 01:52:23.400]  And if they have a crusader in their ranks, I don't know how well it's going to play out.
[01:52:23.400 --> 01:52:29.400]  But guess what you have available to you that would let you off the hook in that impression?
[01:52:29.400 --> 01:52:30.400]  Jack?
[01:52:30.400 --> 01:52:33.400]  Bingo.
[01:52:33.400 --> 01:52:34.400]  Okay.
[01:52:34.400 --> 01:52:35.400]  All right.
[01:52:35.400 --> 01:52:36.400]  I understand 100 percent.
[01:52:36.400 --> 01:52:37.400]  Moving on.
[01:52:37.400 --> 01:52:38.400]  Next.
[01:52:38.400 --> 01:52:39.400]  Thank you.
[01:52:39.400 --> 01:52:40.400]  I'm not just trying to move on.
[01:52:40.400 --> 01:52:41.400]  I'm dismissing.
[01:52:41.400 --> 01:52:42.400]  No worries.
[01:52:42.400 --> 01:52:43.400]  I get what you mean.
[01:52:43.400 --> 01:52:45.400]  I've been there 14 years.
[01:52:45.400 --> 01:52:48.400]  I know the flow.
[01:52:48.400 --> 01:52:53.400]  Next question.
[01:52:53.400 --> 01:52:55.400]  I have to go through this gate every night.
[01:52:55.400 --> 01:52:56.400]  You guys are nice enough.
[01:52:56.400 --> 01:52:59.400]  They've let me slide for a while because I told them I'm trying to deal with this and
[01:52:59.400 --> 01:53:03.400]  they've been very nice about it and I trained at Leonard Woods so they can understand completely
[01:53:03.400 --> 01:53:04.400]  and I'm cool with them.
[01:53:04.400 --> 01:53:09.400]  But they only let me go so far with this unless I have something to back it up.
[01:53:09.400 --> 01:53:12.400]  Is the other reason why going to JAG might be beneficial?
[01:53:12.400 --> 01:53:16.400]  JAG might be able to get you some paperwork that would prevent them from harassing you
[01:53:16.400 --> 01:53:20.400]  while this is ongoing.
[01:53:20.400 --> 01:53:27.400]  I went to JAG for another issue with some rank collection in Texas when I first got here.
[01:53:27.400 --> 01:53:34.400]  And they told me that they could only represent me when the Army came after me.
[01:53:34.400 --> 01:53:36.400]  So from my first sergeant or somebody.
[01:53:36.400 --> 01:53:37.400]  Right.
[01:53:37.400 --> 01:53:41.400]  But you said this citation was federal, right?
[01:53:41.400 --> 01:53:42.400]  Correct.
[01:53:42.400 --> 01:53:44.400]  There you go.
[01:53:44.400 --> 01:53:45.400]  Okay.
[01:53:45.400 --> 01:53:46.400]  Roger.
[01:53:46.400 --> 01:53:47.400]  All right.
[01:53:47.400 --> 01:53:48.400]  Next question.
[01:53:48.400 --> 01:53:49.400]  Moving on.
[01:53:49.400 --> 01:53:50.400]  Trying to go fast.
[01:53:50.400 --> 01:53:55.400]  Going through the gate, barring any paperwork.
[01:53:55.400 --> 01:54:00.400]  I would like to actually do this the way that you teach every night.
[01:54:00.400 --> 01:54:01.400]  Right.
[01:54:01.400 --> 01:54:05.400]  What would be the way to play this when I'm dealing with a federal court like this?
[01:54:05.400 --> 01:54:06.400]  Just in general.
[01:54:06.400 --> 01:54:09.400]  Well, you would still have the federal court, depending upon what law they're trying to
[01:54:09.400 --> 01:54:13.400]  charge you under, which in case of a traffic would have to be something under the state
[01:54:13.400 --> 01:54:17.400]  level unless they're actually have traffic laws for the base that they're accusing you
[01:54:17.400 --> 01:54:19.400]  of violating.
[01:54:19.400 --> 01:54:22.400]  And I've done every Google search under the sun that I could find.
[01:54:22.400 --> 01:54:26.400]  There's obviously going to be no law stated on the ticket here.
[01:54:26.400 --> 01:54:30.400]  Well, actually, at the federal level, the only law that exists is the Federal Motor
[01:54:30.400 --> 01:54:32.400]  Carrier Safety Act under Title 49.
[01:54:32.400 --> 01:54:34.400]  And you're not a federal motor carrier.
[01:54:34.400 --> 01:54:37.400]  I set that up earlier and I couldn't find anything.
[01:54:37.400 --> 01:54:39.400]  And it's not even cited in here.
[01:54:39.400 --> 01:54:44.400]  And honestly, the BMP that gave me the ticket didn't know what was going on.
[01:54:44.400 --> 01:54:45.400]  Right.
[01:54:45.400 --> 01:54:48.400]  So they would have had to have issued it under some state law, which he doesn't know
[01:54:48.400 --> 01:54:51.400]  and which they have no authority to enforce.
[01:54:51.400 --> 01:54:55.400]  They're not peace officers within the state, are they?
[01:54:55.400 --> 01:54:57.400]  Not last time I checked.
[01:54:57.400 --> 01:54:58.400]  There you go.
[01:54:58.400 --> 01:55:03.400]  So the question becomes if he's issuing you a ticket, then it has to be some federal basis
[01:55:03.400 --> 01:55:04.400]  for it.
[01:55:04.400 --> 01:55:05.400]  What is it?
[01:55:05.400 --> 01:55:08.400]  You have a right to know that.
[01:55:08.400 --> 01:55:12.400]  That's, again, a reason you need to talk to Jack.
[01:55:12.400 --> 01:55:16.400]  And that begs the question.
[01:55:16.400 --> 01:55:20.400]  I mean, I know when you deal in Texas, you're dealing with a good old boy corrupt system
[01:55:20.400 --> 01:55:21.400]  up one side, down the other.
[01:55:21.400 --> 01:55:22.400]  Yeah.
[01:55:22.400 --> 01:55:25.400]  Is there some reason you think because they salute a flag twice a day that they're any
[01:55:25.400 --> 01:55:26.400]  different?
[01:55:26.400 --> 01:55:27.400]  No.
[01:55:27.400 --> 01:55:32.400]  But what I do now is most of them that have patrolling around here aren't even hardly
[01:55:32.400 --> 01:55:33.400]  specialists.
[01:55:33.400 --> 01:55:34.400]  That's why I shout.
[01:55:34.400 --> 01:55:35.400]  Yeah.
[01:55:35.400 --> 01:55:38.400]  The ones they have working to be here, they don't know they're buff from a hole in the
[01:55:38.400 --> 01:55:39.400]  ground.
[01:55:39.400 --> 01:55:40.400]  There you go.
[01:55:40.400 --> 01:55:42.400]  The argument that I get with them is give me the ticket and move on, take fire and move
[01:55:42.400 --> 01:55:43.400]  forward.
[01:55:43.400 --> 01:55:44.400]  Exactly.
[01:55:44.400 --> 01:55:46.400]  And then go after them from the other side.
[01:55:46.400 --> 01:55:47.400]  Roger.
[01:55:47.400 --> 01:55:50.400]  As you would understand it, a flanking maneuver.
[01:55:50.400 --> 01:55:51.400]  Yeah.
[01:55:51.400 --> 01:55:52.400]  Roger.
[01:55:52.400 --> 01:55:53.400]  Okay.
[01:55:53.400 --> 01:55:58.400]  So then first course of action, go to Jack, say, hey, I have the State of Texas doing
[01:55:58.400 --> 01:55:59.400]  this.
[01:55:59.400 --> 01:56:00.400]  I'm in Texas, Myles.
[01:56:00.400 --> 01:56:01.400]  No, no, no, no.
[01:56:01.400 --> 01:56:04.400]  The State of Texas issues red light camera, got nothing to do with them.
[01:56:04.400 --> 01:56:07.400]  We're talking about the other citation that you've got.
[01:56:07.400 --> 01:56:08.400]  Go to them.
[01:56:08.400 --> 01:56:11.400]  An Army MP issued it, right?
[01:56:11.400 --> 01:56:12.400]  Roger.
[01:56:12.400 --> 01:56:13.400]  Okay.
[01:56:13.400 --> 01:56:14.400]  That's something they can help you with.
[01:56:14.400 --> 01:56:17.400]  They can't do anything about the red light camera ticket.
[01:56:17.400 --> 01:56:20.400]  You're going to have to deal with that one outside of them.
[01:56:20.400 --> 01:56:24.400]  You might be able to go and ask them questions, but they're not going to be able to represent
[01:56:24.400 --> 01:56:25.400]  you.
[01:56:25.400 --> 01:56:30.400]  You get to ask them questions about my point of view on this as far as state law, and they
[01:56:30.400 --> 01:56:32.400]  can choose to answer it or ignore it.
[01:56:32.400 --> 01:56:34.400]  But it doesn't hurt to ask.
[01:56:34.400 --> 01:56:35.400]  You never know until you try.
[01:56:35.400 --> 01:56:36.400]  Here comes Mike.
[01:56:36.400 --> 01:56:40.400]  Well, then that begs the question, because you mentioned earlier, get some sort of paperwork,
[01:56:40.400 --> 01:56:42.400]  you know, send a tort notice.
[01:56:42.400 --> 01:56:47.400]  Well, if you go to my blog, there's a red light camera ticket letter already there.
[01:56:47.400 --> 01:56:48.400]  There's two, in fact.
[01:56:48.400 --> 01:56:49.400]  Yeah.
[01:56:49.400 --> 01:56:54.400]  But you need to get the updated one that deals with the latest issue on that.
[01:56:54.400 --> 01:57:01.400]  But go to toweloflaw.wordpress.com and do a search there for red light camera.
[01:57:01.400 --> 01:57:05.400]  And it'll pull up every article I've done on that, which are several.
[01:57:05.400 --> 01:57:10.400]  But there will be one that says, Texas only updated red light camera ticket letter.
[01:57:10.400 --> 01:57:13.400]  Get that and send it.
[01:57:13.400 --> 01:57:16.400]  And then make sure that you reword it just a little bit.
[01:57:16.400 --> 01:57:22.400]  This is my notice of tort to you that I plan to sue you in court for the following violations
[01:57:22.400 --> 01:57:24.400]  of my rights and law.
[01:57:24.400 --> 01:57:27.400]  And then go with what the letter says.
[01:57:27.400 --> 01:57:28.400]  Okay?
[01:57:28.400 --> 01:57:29.400]  Okay.
[01:57:29.400 --> 01:57:30.400]  That's separate.
[01:57:30.400 --> 01:57:33.400]  With Jaggi again, just for clarification, while I go to bed here, because I'm going
[01:57:33.400 --> 01:57:35.400]  to hit the rack.
[01:57:35.400 --> 01:57:38.400]  You're just going to ask them for information and advice.
[01:57:38.400 --> 01:57:40.400]  They're not going to be able to represent you.
[01:57:40.400 --> 01:57:41.400]  Not for the red light.
[01:57:41.400 --> 01:57:42.400]  I'm talking about the citation.
[01:57:42.400 --> 01:57:43.400]  Okay.
[01:57:43.400 --> 01:57:44.400]  All right.
[01:57:44.400 --> 01:57:46.400]  The citation itself for the registration.
[01:57:46.400 --> 01:57:50.400]  I mean, I don't want to look like a moron with these people and have them reporting back
[01:57:50.400 --> 01:57:53.400]  that, hey, we got somebody trying to stir up some stuff.
[01:57:53.400 --> 01:57:58.400]  I go in there and say, I mean, that's the general premise of what they do here.
[01:57:58.400 --> 01:57:59.400]  There's a brag right now.
[01:57:59.400 --> 01:58:03.400]  No, I'm just saying when you go in there to them and say, look, guys, I am trying to deal
[01:58:03.400 --> 01:58:07.400]  with this issue to get this registration redone at the state level back in Texas.
[01:58:07.400 --> 01:58:11.400]  But right now they're screwing me over by doing something they're not supposed to do,
[01:58:11.400 --> 01:58:13.400]  and I'm trying to fight it.
[01:58:13.400 --> 01:58:17.400]  Can you give me something that would prevent me from being harassed on base until I could
[01:58:17.400 --> 01:58:19.400]  get this addressed?
[01:58:19.400 --> 01:58:20.400]  It's really that simple.
[01:58:20.400 --> 01:58:21.400]  Okay.
[01:58:21.400 --> 01:58:22.400]  Okay?
[01:58:22.400 --> 01:58:23.400]  Does that make sense?
[01:58:23.400 --> 01:58:24.400]  All right.
[01:58:24.400 --> 01:58:25.400]  Okay.
[01:58:25.400 --> 01:58:26.400]  Understood.
[01:58:26.400 --> 01:58:27.400]  All right.
[01:58:27.400 --> 01:58:28.400]  Yes, sir.
[01:58:28.400 --> 01:58:29.400]  George, I'm sorry, man.
[01:58:29.400 --> 01:58:30.400]  I was not able to get to you.
[01:58:30.400 --> 01:58:33.400]  But if you've got some questions you want to ask, rather general commentary, please
[01:58:33.400 --> 01:58:39.400]  email me, Eddie, E-D-D-I-E, at Rule of Law Radio, and I'll get back with you as quick
[01:58:39.400 --> 01:58:40.400]  as I can.
[01:58:40.400 --> 01:58:42.400]  Folks, thank you so much for listening in.
[01:58:42.400 --> 01:58:45.400]  Please go to the website and check out the fundraiser and donate once you can.
[01:58:45.400 --> 01:58:50.400]  Y'all have a great week, good night, and God bless.
[01:58:50.400 --> 01:58:56.400]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.400 --> 01:58:57.400]  Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.400 --> 01:59:02.400]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:02.400 --> 01:59:07.400]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:07.400 --> 01:59:10.400]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:10.400 --> 01:59:19.400]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:19.400 --> 01:59:25.400]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:25.400 --> 01:59:29.400]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.400 --> 01:59:32.400]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.400 --> 01:59:40.400]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.400 --> 01:59:49.400]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.400 --> 01:59:59.400]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.