[00:00.000 --> 00:07.760] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly [00:07.760 --> 00:09.960] bulletins for the commodities market. [00:09.960 --> 00:23.280] Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [00:23.280 --> 00:29.720] Markets for Wednesday, the 18th of January, 2017, are currently trading with gold at $1,211.45. [00:29.720 --> 00:38.080] Silver, $17.23 an ounce, Texas crude, $52.48 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting [00:38.080 --> 00:46.480] at about $878 U.S. currency. [00:46.480 --> 00:52.400] Today in history, the year 2005, the Airbus A380, the world's largest commercial jet to [00:52.400 --> 00:56.040] date, is unveiled at its ceremony in Toulouse, France. [00:56.040 --> 01:01.200] It has roughly 6,000 square feet of usable floor space, can seat up to 853 people in [01:01.200 --> 01:06.560] an all-economy class, and has a flight range of roughly 8,500 nautical miles. [01:06.560 --> 01:11.760] The Airbus A380 didn't get its first commercial flight until later that year in April, but [01:11.760 --> 01:18.120] it was unveiled today in history. [01:18.120 --> 01:22.360] In recent news, President Obama announced his exercise of clemency in commuting the [01:22.360 --> 01:27.440] sentence of Chelsea, formerly Bradley Manning. Manning had been arrested in 2010 after being [01:27.440 --> 01:32.200] outed by former hacker Adrian Lamo for being the main WikiLeaks source on the hundreds [01:32.200 --> 01:36.520] of thousands of sensitive U.S. government documents filed on him, which included cable [01:36.520 --> 01:38.120] gate and collateral murder. [01:38.120 --> 01:43.120] Thirty-nine minutes of classified gunsight footage in 2010 in Iraq, which shows two U.S. [01:43.120 --> 01:49.120] AH-64 Apache helicopters indiscriminately shooting and killing unarmed civilians, including [01:49.120 --> 01:52.760] two Iraqi war correspondents working for Reuters. [01:52.760 --> 01:57.440] Manning was held in virtual solitary confinement for 23 hours a day at a Marine Corps brig [01:57.440 --> 02:02.720] and sometimes even stripped completely naked. In 2013, he was sentenced in a military tribunal [02:02.720 --> 02:07.560] to 35 years in prison with the possibility of parole in the eighth year and dishonorably [02:07.560 --> 02:09.360] discharged from the Army. [02:09.360 --> 02:11.960] As a result of Obama's pardon, Manning will be free in May. [02:11.960 --> 02:16.400] To add a twist to all this, Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, tweeted last week via [02:16.400 --> 02:21.280] WikiLeaks' Twitter account that, quote, if Obama grants Manning clemency, Assange will [02:21.280 --> 02:27.120] agree to U.S. extradition despite clear unconstitutionality of the Department of Justice case. [02:27.120 --> 02:31.520] Assange has spent over four years in hideout at the Ecuadorian embassy in London. [02:31.520 --> 02:36.040] Melinda Taylor, a member of Mr. Assange's legal team, recently stated to the press that [02:36.040 --> 02:38.840] everything that he has said, he's standing by. [02:38.840 --> 02:43.040] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors and even contributors. [02:43.040 --> 02:47.000] If you have a product or a service you'd like to advertise with us or even want to write [02:47.000 --> 02:53.400] articles and read for us, feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257. [02:53.400 --> 03:22.760] This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for January 18th, 2017. [03:24.040 --> 03:30.560] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:30.560 --> 03:32.680] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:32.680 --> 03:35.880] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:35.880 --> 03:38.280] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:38.280 --> 03:43.720] When you were eight and you had bad dreams, you go to school and learn the golden rule. [03:43.720 --> 03:46.680] So why are you acting like a bloody fool? [03:46.680 --> 03:51.960] If you get caught in your master crew, bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:51.960 --> 03:54.920] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:54.920 --> 04:02.200] Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rue La Radio on this, the 19th day [04:02.200 --> 04:08.120] of January 2017, our Thursday night show. [04:08.120 --> 04:14.120] We're gonna start out by talking about our fundraiser and giveaway and we're gonna turn [04:14.120 --> 04:16.760] it over to Deborah for that. [04:16.760 --> 04:18.440] Yes, Randy, thank you. [04:18.440 --> 04:24.360] Okay, folks, guys and gals out there, it is that time again. [04:24.360 --> 04:27.720] We are holding our 2017 fundraiser. [04:27.720 --> 04:34.600] We just launched it last week and we have our very special sponsor. [04:34.600 --> 04:41.800] Again, Mr. Michael Cargill from Central Texas Gunworks has notified me today that the grand [04:41.800 --> 04:47.240] prize that he is donating to the fundraiser is a Spikes Tactical AR Rifle. [04:47.240 --> 04:49.400] The full rifle. [04:49.400 --> 04:56.040] Last year he donated the lower receiver and for second prize a Taurus Curve and this year [04:56.040 --> 05:00.960] he's got a grand prize of the rifle, the complete rifle. [05:00.960 --> 05:03.080] So pretty excited about that. [05:03.080 --> 05:08.640] We've had a couple of listeners come forward saying they wanted to contribute to some prizes [05:08.640 --> 05:12.880] so there may be a second firearm up for grabs. [05:12.880 --> 05:19.360] We shall see, I'll notify the listeners more as that develops. [05:19.360 --> 05:27.800] But for sure we've got the AR-15 Rifle, Spikes Tactical and also a local business is sponsoring [05:27.800 --> 05:31.440] the drawing this year, the fundraiser this year. [05:31.440 --> 05:40.760] Sal's Deli in Austin is donating $200 gift certificates to his Deli and if you want to [05:40.760 --> 05:45.920] know more about that you can look up Sal's Deli in Austin. [05:45.920 --> 05:53.500] He was actually a guest on About Your Health this past Monday talking about his healthy [05:53.500 --> 05:59.240] choices of organic this and that and how good the meat quality is and such. [05:59.240 --> 06:08.440] So that's not on the website yet but we will be making that post with a link to Sal's Deli [06:08.440 --> 06:18.200] and also we are launching tonight, I am very excited, Randy's eBook, Legal 101. [06:18.200 --> 06:23.800] He has been working on this for quite some time now and so we are launching his eBook [06:23.800 --> 06:28.080] tonight and that is 100 bucks. [06:28.080 --> 06:35.440] I think that is a very reasonable price considering Randy's expertise and experience and the research [06:35.440 --> 06:40.960] that he's done, you get to learn some strategies on paper. [06:40.960 --> 06:47.480] Legal 101, I think it's an excellent price, I mean Dr. Frederick Graves has jurisdictionary, [06:47.480 --> 06:54.400] that's 250, Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar is 250 and so we've got Randy Kelton's Legal [06:54.400 --> 07:02.480] 101 for the special cut rate price of 100 bucks and if you purchase Randy's eBook, [07:02.480 --> 07:06.360] you will get four entries into the drawing. [07:06.360 --> 07:13.040] So how can you lose 100 bucks, get you Randy's eBook and four entries into the drawing and [07:13.040 --> 07:20.200] you might end up with a spiked tactical AR-15 rifle or more and of course if you purchase [07:20.200 --> 07:27.280] Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar during the fundraiser, which is 250, then you get 10 entries into [07:27.280 --> 07:36.600] the drawing and the 2014 winner was actually a customer who purchased the traffic seminar, [07:36.600 --> 07:37.960] Eddie's Traffic Seminar. [07:37.960 --> 07:43.920] So there you go, it works, you increase your chances and folks out there who don't necessarily [07:43.920 --> 07:49.320] want to buy one of the products, 25 bucks gets you one entry into the drawing. [07:49.320 --> 07:52.280] Every 25 dollars you donate gets your name in the hat. [07:52.280 --> 07:58.080] So three 25 dollar donations gets your name in the hat three times. [07:58.080 --> 08:02.720] Of course I think the best deal is to just go ahead and buy Randy's eBook because that's [08:02.720 --> 08:10.480] brand new, we're just releasing it today and listen folks, please consider supporting us. [08:10.480 --> 08:15.240] 25 dollars is not that much, we're not asking for a lot. [08:15.240 --> 08:22.800] In the past we have reached our goal of anywhere from 7 to 10 thousand dollars for a year and [08:22.800 --> 08:27.680] we would like to try to meet our goal early in the year. [08:27.680 --> 08:32.560] Last year it took until about August to meet the goal but it's really very helpful if we [08:32.560 --> 08:37.640] can meet the goal early because then we can make equipment purchases for upgrades. [08:37.640 --> 08:42.320] If things just kind of trickle in then it's just like you never see the money. [08:42.320 --> 08:48.720] It's like if you loan somebody 500 bucks and they pay you back 5 dollars a month, it's [08:48.720 --> 08:50.240] like you never see the money. [08:50.240 --> 08:56.960] So if we could meet our goal early this year then I could go ahead and make some equipment [08:56.960 --> 08:57.960] purchases. [08:57.960 --> 09:04.280] I could plan things out better because if things just kind of slowly come in I don't [09:04.280 --> 09:09.760] know what to expect, I don't know how to plan, I don't know what kind of upgrades to do and [09:09.760 --> 09:14.560] so things just kind of are a little bit haphazard as the year goes on and we just kind of limp [09:14.560 --> 09:19.280] along hoping we're going to be able to upgrade this or that as it breaks and things like [09:19.280 --> 09:21.200] that. [09:21.200 --> 09:26.920] And listen, the other thing I wanted to point out is that in the past typically we've met [09:26.920 --> 09:35.400] our goal by only around 100 donors total. [09:35.400 --> 09:37.760] That's not very many people. [09:37.760 --> 09:46.520] I mean I know that we have a lot more listeners than that and so I mean if you do the math [09:46.520 --> 09:51.600] that's around an average of 100 dollars a person for 100 people. [09:51.600 --> 09:57.600] And so listen, it's not really fair to kind of put the whole fundraiser on just a few [09:57.600 --> 10:01.680] people to come up with some large dollar donations. [10:01.680 --> 10:05.280] I know that we have thousands of listeners. [10:05.280 --> 10:11.360] I mean you know we've got a thousand, I mean just say even a thousand listeners, if they [10:11.360 --> 10:15.760] donated 10 bucks a piece we would meet our goal. [10:15.760 --> 10:23.840] If 500 people donated 25 dollars a piece, I mean we would exceed the goal and I could [10:23.840 --> 10:24.840] really do something. [10:24.840 --> 10:30.160] If a thousand people donated 25 dollars a piece, I mean imagine where I could take this [10:30.160 --> 10:35.600] network, I could hire producers instead of relying on volunteers, I could really take [10:35.600 --> 10:43.960] things to the next level, I could hire people to be full time for dealing with sponsors [10:43.960 --> 10:49.880] to try to get more sponsors, to try to promote the network, to try to push for syndication [10:49.880 --> 10:56.400] of our shows on AM and FM stations around the country, not just a few like we're on [10:56.400 --> 10:58.120] now. [10:58.120 --> 11:04.240] I could commit to a satellite contract and get us on free to air satellite. [11:04.240 --> 11:06.600] You know it's not cheap. [11:06.600 --> 11:13.600] I mean we can do it, it's within reach, but it's going to take more than 100 people. [11:13.600 --> 11:20.800] And so listen, we do not despise the day of small donations because if everybody does [11:20.800 --> 11:25.060] a little bit, then we all go a long way. [11:25.060 --> 11:26.460] We all go really far. [11:26.460 --> 11:34.960] So please consider donating 25 dollars if you can, and if you can only give 5 dollars, [11:34.960 --> 11:35.960] that's fine. [11:35.960 --> 11:40.120] I mean if 10,000 people gave a dollar, I would meet my goal. [11:40.120 --> 11:44.760] So it's like the more people that ship in, even if it's just a little bit, the better. [11:44.760 --> 11:50.600] And so anyways, at this juncture, I'd like to turn the floor over to Randy because I [11:50.600 --> 11:52.440] want to hear more about his e-book. [11:52.440 --> 11:55.720] So Randy, give us a little sneak preview, give us a taste. [11:55.720 --> 11:56.720] It's in the e-book. [11:56.720 --> 12:00.200] Okay, there's just one little thing. [12:00.200 --> 12:07.800] Always when she does these promos, she never seems to bring up Randy's beer phone. [12:07.800 --> 12:13.840] I kind of forgot about that part, sorry. [12:13.840 --> 12:23.120] What its e-book is, is 10 years of experience on the radio and 30 years of experience dealing [12:23.120 --> 12:24.120] with public officials. [12:24.120 --> 12:29.120] I do a lot of study and a lot of research. [12:29.120 --> 12:34.600] What is in this e-book, I don't find anywhere. [12:34.600 --> 12:43.840] It is a level of knowledge that you get banging around in the system. [12:43.840 --> 12:49.720] The one thing that's clear about the whole book, things are not the way they taught you [12:49.720 --> 12:54.040] in high school or college. [12:54.040 --> 12:57.320] They don't really work that way. [12:57.320 --> 13:03.120] Most of us have been out in the world a while and we've come to realize that it's not the [13:03.120 --> 13:07.000] way everybody tried to convince us as it was. [13:07.000 --> 13:09.240] So the question becomes, how is it? [13:09.240 --> 13:11.080] How does it really work? [13:11.080 --> 13:19.120] And the whole idea of this is to give you a good idea of how it really works and it's [13:19.120 --> 13:24.680] not just that it's a book about how things really work. [13:24.680 --> 13:35.800] I've been doing this show for about 10 years now and over time I've worked out some ways [13:35.800 --> 13:39.320] of presenting things that make sense to human beings. [13:39.320 --> 13:48.200] There's a lot of things I can talk about but it won't make sense to anybody but me. [13:48.200 --> 13:53.880] After I have talked about the same things over and over to different people in different [13:53.880 --> 14:00.080] situations and circumstances, I've kind of figured out how to present these. [14:00.080 --> 14:07.400] I've tried to lay out the book in a logical sequence. [14:07.400 --> 14:17.520] When someone calls in and asks for my opinion and advice on things, I have a set of underlying [14:17.520 --> 14:26.480] rules that most everything I do, most everything I tell people, are based on that set of underlying [14:26.480 --> 14:28.840] rules. [14:28.840 --> 14:38.160] So when someone asks me something about a legal issue, I don't have to be so fully versed [14:38.160 --> 14:45.720] in a legal situation to have a really good idea of how to maneuver through the system [14:45.720 --> 14:52.680] and if you listen to my show a lot, you will recognize times when I make it clear that [14:52.680 --> 14:58.440] this is not my area of knowledge but I do have some idea of how to maneuver through [14:58.440 --> 15:01.840] the system. [15:01.840 --> 15:10.040] Once you go through this, and it's larger than I wanted it to be, it's about 150 pages, [15:10.040 --> 15:16.200] past down from 200 and something, there was a large section that I took out that I think [15:16.200 --> 15:19.600] only I would understand is why I took it out. [15:19.600 --> 15:23.800] I put together a mental map of the living mind. [15:23.800 --> 15:31.720] It's a little less soteric for this application but I've got it down to about 150 pages. [15:31.720 --> 15:42.320] And if you have a legal issue, if you're concerned about say your privacy or about the government [15:42.320 --> 15:52.600] intruding on your life, folks I can tell you, the government doesn't intrude on my life. [15:52.600 --> 15:59.840] The government come to me and want to mess with me, I will give them a whomp through [15:59.840 --> 16:00.840] the legal system. [16:00.840 --> 16:06.360] They are not going to believe and it's all right here. [16:06.360 --> 16:09.480] It's not that terribly complex. [16:09.480 --> 16:17.200] There's a lot of information here because the first section I talk about the primarily [16:17.200 --> 16:22.600] the way to think about how law works. [16:22.600 --> 16:25.040] And lawyers do not learn this in law school. [16:25.040 --> 16:26.640] How to think about your lawyer. [16:26.640 --> 16:30.800] How your lawyer really does what he does. [16:30.800 --> 16:35.440] This is not taught in law school, you'll never find it in books anywhere. [16:35.440 --> 16:42.800] They're not going to tell you that the primary thing that lawyer wants when he talks to you [16:42.800 --> 16:45.400] is a retainer. [16:45.400 --> 16:48.120] He don't care if you have a good case or not. [16:48.120 --> 16:51.680] He doesn't care if the defendant has deep pockets or not. [16:51.680 --> 16:54.680] All he wants is a retainer. [16:54.680 --> 16:56.720] Hang on, got to go to break. [16:56.720 --> 16:59.720] I'll pick this up on the other side. [16:59.720 --> 17:00.720] Dang cookie. [17:00.720 --> 17:01.720] Cookie? [17:01.720 --> 17:02.720] Me love cookie. [17:02.720 --> 17:05.720] Oh hi Cookie Munchers, no, these are yucky cookie. [17:05.720 --> 17:06.720] Cookie? [17:06.720 --> 17:07.720] Yucky? [17:07.720 --> 17:08.720] No, no bad cookie. [17:08.720 --> 17:11.720] You can't even eat these cookies, these are cyber cookies. [17:11.720 --> 17:12.720] No can't eat it. [17:12.720 --> 17:15.720] No, they are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer. [17:15.720 --> 17:17.720] These have apple. [17:17.720 --> 17:18.720] Really? [17:18.720 --> 17:19.720] Oh, that's an actual apple. [17:19.720 --> 17:20.720] Yummy apple. [17:20.720 --> 17:26.760] I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash. [17:26.760 --> 17:32.960] I click CTRL, SHIFT, DELETE, and then scroll down to COOKIES and CLEAR them. [17:32.960 --> 17:34.360] Bye bye, Yuckie Cookies. [17:34.360 --> 17:40.760] Now, I go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand side, [17:40.760 --> 17:47.160] bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies. [17:47.160 --> 17:48.960] New cookies? For me? [17:48.960 --> 17:50.760] Consider it an early Christmas present. [17:50.760 --> 17:54.360] And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link, [17:54.360 --> 17:57.360] and I give a little present to this radio network, too. [17:57.360 --> 17:58.360] C is for Cookies. [17:58.360 --> 18:00.360] C is for Classified. [18:00.360 --> 18:05.360] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [18:05.360 --> 18:09.360] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [18:09.360 --> 18:14.760] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too. [18:14.760 --> 18:20.960] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. [18:20.960 --> 18:24.560] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. [18:24.560 --> 18:26.560] How to answer letters and phone calls. [18:26.560 --> 18:29.160] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [18:29.160 --> 18:33.960] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:33.960 --> 18:38.760] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:38.760 --> 18:41.160] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:41.160 --> 18:46.760] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, [18:46.760 --> 18:49.560] or email MichaelMears at Yahoo.com. [18:49.560 --> 19:00.560] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com, or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-F at Yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [19:00.560 --> 19:22.560] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:22.560 --> 19:40.560] Okay, we are back. [19:40.560 --> 19:43.560] Brandy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, RuleOfLawRadio. [19:43.560 --> 19:53.560] And I'm talking about this e-book, and it's really just common sense, basic how things actually work. [19:53.560 --> 19:56.560] Now, it's not complete. [19:56.560 --> 19:59.560] It probably never will be complete. [19:59.560 --> 20:03.560] And if anybody purchased it, if you find any errors in it, [20:03.560 --> 20:16.560] or if you find places in there where I've explained something and you read it and wonder what the heck I'm talking about, [20:16.560 --> 20:23.560] or if you have to read something twice to make sense of it, let me know. [20:23.560 --> 20:26.560] Make comments. [20:26.560 --> 20:37.560] I'm trying to construct something here that will truly power the individual. [20:37.560 --> 20:43.560] If you have to read something twice to make sense of it, I haven't done it outright. [20:43.560 --> 20:45.560] I need to go back and fix it. [20:45.560 --> 20:51.560] There's a common problem that people have with writing instructional material. [20:51.560 --> 20:57.560] We know the material frontwards and backwards. [20:57.560 --> 21:03.560] What we don't know is what our reader doesn't know. [21:03.560 --> 21:11.560] So sometimes we skip over things without realizing that we've done it. [21:11.560 --> 21:15.560] Anybody who's ever tried to read a tech manual, [21:15.560 --> 21:23.560] get quickly frustrated when the writer uses terms of art that he never explained or explains, [21:23.560 --> 21:29.560] or uses an acronym that he hasn't explained repeatedly. [21:29.560 --> 21:32.560] Explaining an acronym once is not near enough. [21:32.560 --> 21:39.560] One of the rules in the e-book is do not use acronyms. [21:39.560 --> 21:43.560] Acronyms make humans crazy. [21:43.560 --> 21:45.560] We never get them right. [21:45.560 --> 21:48.560] It always trips up the reader. Never use acronyms. [21:48.560 --> 21:53.560] I have a lot of relatively simple ideas, [21:53.560 --> 22:02.560] and I've tried to structure them in a way so that one adds to another, [22:02.560 --> 22:06.560] and you get a general overall idea how to deal with these people. [22:06.560 --> 22:18.560] Now, one thing I will be adding to this e-book is fill-in-the-blank documentation. [22:18.560 --> 22:25.560] I will be producing documents for most of the common things we do. [22:25.560 --> 22:35.560] I've been sending out two information requests and a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction for traffic. [22:35.560 --> 22:41.560] There are three basic documents, and anybody who wants them, I'll send them to you. [22:41.560 --> 22:47.560] I'm working on those to get them in a condition to where I can, [22:47.560 --> 22:53.560] you can go online or just pull down a fill-in-the-blanks PDF document, [22:53.560 --> 22:56.560] and some of them that are somewhat more complex, [22:56.560 --> 23:02.560] I'm working up how to build a questionnaire on the first page, [23:02.560 --> 23:06.560] and then it will auto-fill the document on the rest of the pages. [23:06.560 --> 23:16.560] So you fill in the information I need, and then the system will merge it into an output document. [23:16.560 --> 23:22.560] And I will be using this e-book as a test bed, [23:22.560 --> 23:26.560] as a place to make these available for people to use them, [23:26.560 --> 23:31.560] and tell me what's wrong with them and help me beta-test them. [23:31.560 --> 23:41.560] And then eventually I'll put together a paralegal service or an online web service for just people [23:41.560 --> 23:46.560] who don't know anything about this that can go on and just fill in some blanks [23:46.560 --> 23:48.560] and it will spit about some documents. [23:48.560 --> 23:54.560] And it's something I plan as a tool to help to support this network. [23:54.560 --> 23:56.560] But for now, I have the e-book up. [23:56.560 --> 24:00.560] It has a tremendous amount of information in it. [24:00.560 --> 24:06.560] I would appreciate anybody who goes through it to give me good feedback. [24:06.560 --> 24:10.560] Rip it to shreds. Don't spare my feelings. [24:10.560 --> 24:19.560] I don't have a personal investment in this other than wanting it to be a valuable resource. [24:19.560 --> 24:21.560] So that's what I'm going to talk about now. [24:21.560 --> 24:30.560] If you want the e-book, go on Douglas Radio Network. Debra has put up a button on PayPal. [24:30.560 --> 24:35.560] So everybody buy it and the network will be happy. [24:35.560 --> 24:37.560] Somebody will win that gun. [24:37.560 --> 24:40.560] Okay. We have a couple of callers on board. [24:40.560 --> 24:44.560] We're going to go to Andrew in Pennsylvania. [24:44.560 --> 24:48.560] Hello, Andrew. What do you have for us today? [24:48.560 --> 24:53.560] Randy, lawyer once told me, yeah, the lawyer in my Arizona case, [24:53.560 --> 24:58.560] that it's pointless to try to argue, never engage in transportation in the first place. [24:58.560 --> 25:01.560] His excuse was, I can take your case all the way up to the Supreme Court [25:01.560 --> 25:04.560] and the Supreme Court will refuse to hear it. [25:04.560 --> 25:05.560] Well, hold on a minute. [25:05.560 --> 25:09.560] Article 3, Section 2, Paragraph 2 of the Federal Constitution says, [25:09.560 --> 25:13.560] in all cases affecting ambassadors and other public ministers and councils [25:13.560 --> 25:16.560] and those in which the state shall be a party, [25:16.560 --> 25:19.560] the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. [25:19.560 --> 25:22.560] Now, I read that and I think, wait a minute. [25:22.560 --> 25:27.560] If he takes my case all the way to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court refuses to hear it, [25:27.560 --> 25:31.560] why don't I, as a defendant, have the right to have all charges against me dropped [25:31.560 --> 25:34.560] on the grounds that the Supreme Court, who has original jurisdiction, [25:34.560 --> 25:39.560] was supposed to hear my case but refused to hear my case? [25:39.560 --> 25:50.560] Well, the Supreme Court didn't have original jurisdiction in the claim against you. [25:50.560 --> 26:00.560] The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in a claim against a state. [26:00.560 --> 26:08.560] This is the state making a claim against you, not you making a claim against the state. [26:08.560 --> 26:14.560] If I'm understanding what you're saying right. [26:14.560 --> 26:16.560] But let me make a suggestion. [26:16.560 --> 26:22.560] These people who are saying you can fight this right to travel all the way up to the Supreme Court [26:22.560 --> 26:26.560] and they'll rule against you, they are right. [26:26.560 --> 26:31.560] Now, that may not be right, but that's how it works. [26:31.560 --> 26:40.560] The reason I'm sending out these information requests and the challenge to subject matter jurisdiction [26:40.560 --> 26:47.560] is I'm trying to get people to take a different approach. [26:47.560 --> 26:54.560] The real issue, as I find it, we may get to the right to travel, [26:54.560 --> 27:02.560] but we can't get there until we get past some threshold issues. [27:02.560 --> 27:08.560] And here in Texas, when a police officer writes me a citation, [27:08.560 --> 27:17.560] the first thing I want to know is does the jurisdiction that employs you [27:17.560 --> 27:23.560] have authority to enforce the commercial transportation code? [27:23.560 --> 27:29.560] And when I look at the citation, I don't see anything indicating [27:29.560 --> 27:40.560] that the entity has the authority to enforce this professional conduct code. [27:40.560 --> 27:42.560] Now, they don't say anything about, [27:42.560 --> 27:54.560] you know, I never hear of writing tickets to plumbers or doctors or psychiatrists [27:54.560 --> 28:02.560] or private investigators or lawyers even, right? [28:02.560 --> 28:04.560] They don't write them tickets for practicing law. [28:04.560 --> 28:08.560] All of those are licensed professions. [28:08.560 --> 28:11.560] So striving, it's a licensed profession. [28:11.560 --> 28:18.560] Okay, first I want to know that they have authority to enforce the statutory scheme, [28:18.560 --> 28:21.560] and that needs to be pled. [28:21.560 --> 28:29.560] And then I want to see that the officer himself has the authority to enforce [28:29.560 --> 28:32.560] the transportation code for the jurisdiction [28:32.560 --> 28:36.560] because the requirements they have to meet in order to enforce it. [28:36.560 --> 28:39.560] So I put in a request for his requirements. [28:39.560 --> 28:49.560] And then the citation says nothing about any probable cause to believe [28:49.560 --> 28:54.560] that at the time the officer observed me, [28:54.560 --> 29:03.560] I was engaged in an activity that falls within the statutory scheme. [29:03.560 --> 29:11.560] It's not on complaining on the original complaint, the charging instrument. [29:11.560 --> 29:14.560] So the charging instrument, without all that information, [29:14.560 --> 29:17.560] pled is insufficient or in space, [29:17.560 --> 29:21.560] and it is insufficient to invoke subject matter jurisdiction in the court. [29:21.560 --> 29:27.560] Once you get back up past all that stuff, now we talk about right to travel, [29:27.560 --> 29:30.560] but we haven't got there yet. [29:30.560 --> 29:33.560] You guys haven't proved your ability to step into court, [29:33.560 --> 29:37.560] and you're beginning to win these. [29:37.560 --> 29:43.560] The main thing that's winning them are the information requests. [29:43.560 --> 29:46.560] Nobody beats the requirements. [29:46.560 --> 29:52.560] And when I ask for them specifically by statute, I keep getting the same answer. [29:52.560 --> 29:57.560] We have no records responsive to your request, and they dismiss the case. [29:57.560 --> 30:02.560] Keep going. Be right back. [30:02.560 --> 30:06.560] Could science one day delete our memories and rewrite them with new ones? [30:06.560 --> 30:10.560] Lawyers and philosophers are already debating what it might mean. [30:10.560 --> 30:11.560] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [30:11.560 --> 30:15.560] Back to talk about the morality of altering memory in a moment. [30:15.560 --> 30:17.560] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.560 --> 30:21.560] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:21.560 --> 30:26.560] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:26.560 --> 30:31.560] To protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:31.560 --> 30:34.560] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:34.560 --> 30:37.560] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, [30:37.560 --> 30:41.560] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:41.560 --> 30:44.560] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.560 --> 30:50.560] Imagine this, doctors insert chemicals into your brain that completely erase your memory. [30:50.560 --> 30:53.560] Wiped clean, your mind becomes a blank slate, [30:53.560 --> 30:57.560] ready to accept brand new memories, perhaps even a new personality. [30:57.560 --> 30:59.560] It sounds like a scene from Blade Runner, [30:59.560 --> 31:02.560] the sci-fi classic about robots with artificial memories. [31:02.560 --> 31:06.560] But new research suggests human memories can be overwritten, [31:06.560 --> 31:08.560] like digital files on a laptop. [31:08.560 --> 31:11.560] That's because scientists have found a molecule called zip [31:11.560 --> 31:14.560] that shuts down another one called PKM zeta, [31:14.560 --> 31:16.560] and that's what preserves your memories. [31:16.560 --> 31:22.560] Take it away, and your old identity could be, whatchamacallit, oh yeah, reformatted. [31:22.560 --> 31:31.560] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [31:31.560 --> 31:36.560] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [31:36.560 --> 31:38.560] The government says that fire brought it down. [31:38.560 --> 31:43.560] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [31:43.560 --> 31:46.560] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [31:46.560 --> 31:49.560] And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [31:49.560 --> 31:50.560] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [31:50.560 --> 31:52.560] I'm a structural engineer. [31:52.560 --> 31:53.560] I'm a New York City correction officer. [31:53.560 --> 31:54.560] I'm an Air Force pilot. [31:54.560 --> 31:55.560] I'm a father who lost his son. [31:55.560 --> 31:58.560] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [31:58.560 --> 32:02.560] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [32:02.560 --> 32:05.560] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [32:05.560 --> 32:08.560] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [32:08.560 --> 32:10.560] If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, [32:10.560 --> 32:13.560] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:13.560 --> 32:16.560] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [32:16.560 --> 32:18.560] the right to act in our own private capacity, [32:18.560 --> 32:20.560] and, importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:20.560 --> 32:24.560] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce [32:24.560 --> 32:26.560] and preserve our rights through due process. [32:26.560 --> 32:29.560] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:29.560 --> 32:32.560] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [32:32.560 --> 32:34.560] that will help you understand what due process is [32:34.560 --> 32:36.560] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:36.560 --> 32:38.560] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material [32:38.560 --> 32:41.560] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:41.560 --> 32:43.560] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, [32:43.560 --> 32:46.560] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [32:46.560 --> 32:48.560] and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [32:48.560 --> 32:51.560] hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:51.560 --> 32:53.560] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material [32:53.560 --> 32:55.560] from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:55.560 --> 33:00.560] Order your copy today, and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve. [33:00.560 --> 33:20.560] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:20.560 --> 33:44.560] Okay, we are back. [33:44.560 --> 33:47.560] Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens of Rule of Law Radio, [33:47.560 --> 33:51.560] and we're talking to Andrew in Pennsylvania, but before we go to Andrew, [33:51.560 --> 33:55.560] we've just got our first sale of the e-book. [33:55.560 --> 34:00.560] I encourage all of you to buy it. [34:00.560 --> 34:05.560] I have a bit of trepidation with it because I've written it [34:05.560 --> 34:08.560] and I've struggled through it to get it done in time, [34:08.560 --> 34:13.560] and I am really looking forward to your feedback. [34:13.560 --> 34:16.560] As you go through it, give me feedback. [34:16.560 --> 34:21.560] I think this book will be an ongoing project. [34:21.560 --> 34:25.560] As soon as I get this section lined out, [34:25.560 --> 34:35.560] I'm looking at it as I'm building it to figure out where I start putting in sections [34:35.560 --> 34:41.560] going to particular kinds of law and litigation. [34:41.560 --> 34:47.560] I don't want to infringe on Eddie's side, but I'm going to make two or three documents [34:47.560 --> 34:49.560] for traffic available. [34:49.560 --> 34:54.560] I don't really do traffic, but I'll make two or three documents. [34:54.560 --> 34:59.560] The primary thing you need when you go to court is a way to get things started, [34:59.560 --> 35:03.560] so I'm going to start building some documents that anybody who buys the e-book [35:03.560 --> 35:14.560] can go onto the website I'm building, Legal 101, and click on whatever this particular section is, [35:14.560 --> 35:18.560] fill in the blanks, and this thing will start spitting you out legal documents. [35:18.560 --> 35:27.560] I'll build one for a lawsuit, a malpractice suit, bar grievance, judicial conduct complaints, [35:27.560 --> 35:29.560] criminal complaints. [35:29.560 --> 35:36.560] Most of that I have mostly structured. I just have to get some time to build the output documents, [35:36.560 --> 35:43.560] and we'll start having a set of documents that are very consistent and constructed [35:43.560 --> 35:48.560] in the format that these people expect to see. [35:48.560 --> 35:56.560] One thing I forgot to address going in is today, just a couple hours before the show, [35:56.560 --> 36:03.560] I went down to the post office and mailed a document to the special agent in charge [36:03.560 --> 36:06.560] of the Dallas branch of the FBI. [36:06.560 --> 36:16.560] It's a federal complaint against our illustrious and honorable Judge John Bad Boy McBride. [36:16.560 --> 36:24.560] So I have, and I did that from my fill in the blank PDF federal criminal complaint document. [36:24.560 --> 36:28.560] So I will add a section and start making these available. [36:28.560 --> 36:32.560] And thank you for that first purchase, and we look forward to a lot more. [36:32.560 --> 36:36.560] Okay, back to Andrew. [36:36.560 --> 36:43.560] We can fight the right to travel issue, you know, and they can argue with it. [36:43.560 --> 36:46.560] It's easy for them to dance with it. [36:46.560 --> 36:55.560] What is hard for them is when you take their code exactly the way they use their code [36:55.560 --> 37:01.560] and cram it right down their throats. [37:01.560 --> 37:12.560] Andrew, have you looked over Pennsylvania law as applies to the commercial transportation code? [37:12.560 --> 37:17.560] Yeah, I have looked over it, although I kind of had some other things to say [37:17.560 --> 37:20.560] about the things we were talking about before. [37:20.560 --> 37:21.560] Okay, I'm sorry. [37:21.560 --> 37:25.560] I have a tendency to cut people off. [37:25.560 --> 37:31.560] Okay, but you kind of lost me when you suggested that my case is not applicable [37:31.560 --> 37:35.560] to Article 3, Section 2, Paragraph 2 of the United States Federal Constitution [37:35.560 --> 37:39.560] because it flat out says all cases in which a state shall be a party. [37:39.560 --> 37:42.560] It doesn't matter if it's criminal or civil. [37:42.560 --> 37:45.560] It doesn't matter if the state is the prosecutor or plaintiff or defendant. [37:45.560 --> 37:50.560] And he states, so you kind of lost me when you said that my case would not apply. [37:50.560 --> 37:53.560] Where are you making that assertion? [37:53.560 --> 38:01.560] Well, a civil suit against the state is filed in the state. [38:01.560 --> 38:09.560] The Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction over every criminal complaint [38:09.560 --> 38:12.560] in any state in the country. [38:12.560 --> 38:18.560] You can't apply the Constitution that way. [38:18.560 --> 38:24.560] That reference goes to where the state is a defendant. [38:24.560 --> 38:32.560] That's the only time, as far as I know, that that applies, where the state is the plaintiff. [38:32.560 --> 38:34.560] The state is a sovereign entity. [38:34.560 --> 38:41.560] The feds don't have anything to say about that. [38:41.560 --> 38:42.560] Hmm, interesting. [38:42.560 --> 38:45.560] I'm sure a lot of people would think to differ. [38:45.560 --> 38:47.560] I'm sure a lot of people don't need to put it together. [38:47.560 --> 38:48.560] You understand. [38:48.560 --> 38:54.560] State, we think of state as like a part of a large country. [38:54.560 --> 38:57.560] That's not the way it really is. [38:57.560 --> 39:00.560] Pennsylvania is a sovereign nation. [39:00.560 --> 39:09.560] It's a sovereign state that entered into an agreement with other sovereign nations [39:09.560 --> 39:13.560] to combine their resources for certain purposes. [39:13.560 --> 39:16.560] But they're sovereign nations. [39:16.560 --> 39:22.560] And the federal government can't come in and say, [39:22.560 --> 39:27.560] I'm going to take jurisdiction over the enforcement of your state laws. [39:27.560 --> 39:30.560] The state's a party in every criminal case. [39:30.560 --> 39:34.560] The feds have nothing to say about that. [39:34.560 --> 39:38.560] Undue preemption law. [39:38.560 --> 39:42.560] So I guess I would have to pull that. [39:42.560 --> 39:50.560] I haven't really looked at that article to examine how it applies. [39:50.560 --> 39:54.560] So read the article again. [39:54.560 --> 39:55.560] I have to be missing something. [39:55.560 --> 40:01.560] We all have to be missing something because it doesn't make sense. [40:01.560 --> 40:02.560] Do you want me to read it? [40:02.560 --> 40:03.560] Yeah. [40:03.560 --> 40:07.560] Article 3, section 2, paragraph 2, it says, [40:07.560 --> 40:12.560] In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, [40:12.560 --> 40:16.560] and those in which a state shall be a party, [40:16.560 --> 40:21.560] the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. [40:21.560 --> 40:24.560] Okay. [40:24.560 --> 40:29.560] The only way I've seen that addressed as applied to a state [40:29.560 --> 40:35.560] is where the state itself was sued. [40:35.560 --> 40:40.560] Then generally that applies where one state sues another [40:40.560 --> 40:49.560] or if another country sues one of the states. [40:49.560 --> 40:57.560] There has to be a lot of case law that keeps the federal government [40:57.560 --> 41:03.560] from taking control of every case in which the state is involved. [41:03.560 --> 41:07.560] It just doesn't make sense for it to be read that way. [41:07.560 --> 41:11.560] I know that's exactly how it sounds. [41:11.560 --> 41:15.560] It's that the state versus Randy Kalkin, [41:15.560 --> 41:18.560] if everything went to the Supreme Court, [41:18.560 --> 41:22.560] the Supreme Court wouldn't be able to hear anything. [41:22.560 --> 41:30.560] Well, the thing is the cases really shouldn't be the state of versus someone else. [41:30.560 --> 41:32.560] That's the way they've been doing it, [41:32.560 --> 41:35.560] but the way they've been doing it, that's not how it's supposed to be. [41:35.560 --> 41:38.560] Isn't it supposed to be a more localized jurisdiction [41:38.560 --> 41:43.560] rather than the whole flat-out state of versus someone? [41:43.560 --> 41:51.560] Well, it will be if you have violated, say, a county ordinance [41:51.560 --> 41:53.560] or a municipal ordinance. [41:53.560 --> 41:57.560] If you violated municipal ordinance in Fort Worth, [41:57.560 --> 42:00.560] it would be the City of Fort Worth against whoever. [42:00.560 --> 42:08.560] But if you violate a state law, it will be the state against whoever. [42:08.560 --> 42:12.560] And you're right that the way that reads, [42:12.560 --> 42:20.560] it sounds like it doesn't say in which the state shall be a defendant. [42:20.560 --> 42:24.560] It says a party. [42:24.560 --> 42:31.560] So if the state is the plaintiff under this reading, [42:31.560 --> 42:34.560] then that would have to go to the Supreme. [42:34.560 --> 42:41.560] And I don't see how that can either be reasonable or functional. [42:41.560 --> 42:47.560] Well, the founding fathers never would have expected [42:47.560 --> 42:52.560] that the states would all have so many cases on the books [42:52.560 --> 42:56.560] as far as the state of or the Commonwealth of versus someone. [42:56.560 --> 42:58.560] If they would be sitting in a grave, [42:58.560 --> 43:01.560] if they thought that that's the way it's being done today, [43:01.560 --> 43:03.560] all these state of versus John Doe cases, [43:03.560 --> 43:06.560] that was never probably undermined that it would be to that extent [43:06.560 --> 43:08.560] when they wrote that. [43:08.560 --> 43:13.560] But even if there weren't, if the state passes its own law [43:13.560 --> 43:16.560] because the state is a sovereign entity, [43:16.560 --> 43:23.560] and it wasn't until relatively recently in 65 or so that we all, [43:23.560 --> 43:27.560] that all the state, I'm sorry, it's in the late 1800s, [43:27.560 --> 43:35.560] mid to late 1800s that the government put together a model penal code. [43:35.560 --> 43:38.560] Before that, each one had a different code. [43:38.560 --> 43:41.560] Sometimes it didn't even look alike. [43:41.560 --> 43:46.560] And each one in separate, they were that state's laws. [43:46.560 --> 43:49.560] They're not going to let the beds come in, unfortunately. [43:49.560 --> 43:50.560] Hang on. [43:50.560 --> 43:51.560] We're going to break. [43:51.560 --> 43:53.560] Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Will La Radio. [43:53.560 --> 43:55.560] Randy, the confused commentator. [43:55.560 --> 44:02.560] Be right back. [44:02.560 --> 44:03.560] Hello. [44:03.560 --> 44:06.560] My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, [44:06.560 --> 44:08.560] and I would like to invite you to come by our store [44:08.560 --> 44:11.560] at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas, [44:11.560 --> 44:13.560] buying Brave New Books and Chase Paints [44:13.560 --> 44:15.560] to see all our fantastic health and wellness products [44:15.560 --> 44:17.560] with your very own eyes. [44:17.560 --> 44:19.560] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay [44:19.560 --> 44:21.560] that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [44:21.560 --> 44:23.560] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, [44:23.560 --> 44:28.560] including our Australian EME oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, [44:28.560 --> 44:29.560] and colloidal silver and gold. [44:29.560 --> 44:33.560] Call 512-264-4043, [44:33.560 --> 44:36.560] or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. [44:36.560 --> 44:42.560] That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. [44:42.560 --> 44:43.560] Don't forget to like us on Facebook [44:43.560 --> 44:46.560] for information on events and our products. [44:46.560 --> 45:00.560] naturespureorganics.com. [45:00.560 --> 45:03.560] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:03.560 --> 45:06.560] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, [45:06.560 --> 45:10.560] the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course [45:10.560 --> 45:14.560] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:14.560 --> 45:18.560] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:18.560 --> 45:22.560] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:22.560 --> 45:25.560] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, [45:25.560 --> 45:27.560] and now you can too. [45:27.560 --> 45:30.560] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney [45:30.560 --> 45:34.560] with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:34.560 --> 45:36.560] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, [45:36.560 --> 45:38.560] you can learn what everyone should understand [45:38.560 --> 45:40.560] about the principles and practices [45:40.560 --> 45:43.560] that control our American courts. [45:43.560 --> 45:46.560] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, [45:46.560 --> 45:49.560] tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.560 --> 45:52.560] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.560 --> 45:56.560] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, [45:56.560 --> 46:01.560] or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [46:01.560 --> 46:29.560] MUSIC [46:31.560 --> 46:35.560] All they're taking is a misunderstanding [46:35.560 --> 46:37.560] Somebody calls the police [46:37.560 --> 46:39.560] What's on the spot, spot? [46:43.560 --> 46:45.560] What's on the spot, spot? [46:49.560 --> 46:51.560] What's on the spot, spot? [46:51.560 --> 46:53.560] What's on the spot, spot? [46:53.560 --> 47:19.560] What's on the spot, spot? [47:23.560 --> 47:25.560] What's on the spot, spot? [47:53.560 --> 47:55.560] What's on the spot, spot? [48:23.560 --> 48:27.560] The Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction [48:27.560 --> 48:29.560] In all other cases [48:29.560 --> 48:31.560] Before mentioned, the Supreme Court [48:31.560 --> 48:33.560] Shall have appellate jurisdiction [48:33.560 --> 48:35.560] Both as to law and fact [48:35.560 --> 48:39.560] With such expectation and under such regulation [48:39.560 --> 48:41.560] As the Congress shall make [48:43.560 --> 48:47.560] I'm going to have to research that first sentence [48:47.560 --> 48:51.560] Because Andrew, it sure appears [48:51.560 --> 48:55.560] To say exactly what you claim [48:55.560 --> 48:57.560] And it can't be construed [48:57.560 --> 49:01.560] This was put in there speciously [49:01.560 --> 49:05.560] I mean, it must be construed [49:05.560 --> 49:07.560] That every word was put in there [49:07.560 --> 49:11.560] And carefully crafted and selected [49:11.560 --> 49:13.560] To have specific meaning [49:13.560 --> 49:17.560] In all cases of ambassadors [49:17.560 --> 49:19.560] Other public ministers and councils [49:19.560 --> 49:25.560] And those in which a state shall be party [49:25.560 --> 49:29.560] The Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction [49:29.560 --> 49:33.560] I'm not sure how it looks [49:35.560 --> 49:37.560] Don't know what to tell you, Andrew [49:37.560 --> 49:39.560] I have to research this [49:39.560 --> 49:43.560] You stumped the chump [49:43.560 --> 49:45.560] That is no way to start out [49:45.560 --> 49:49.560] Right after I put out my ebook [49:49.560 --> 49:51.560] And want everybody to buy it [49:51.560 --> 49:53.560] And you call right in first thing [49:53.560 --> 49:55.560] And totally stump me [49:57.560 --> 49:59.560] Don't you feel bad about that, Andrew? [49:59.560 --> 50:03.560] Well, everything happens for a reason [50:03.560 --> 50:05.560] There's no such thing as a coincidence [50:05.560 --> 50:09.560] I think this was a blessing in disguise [50:09.560 --> 50:11.560] Well, maybe it will be, I don't know [50:11.560 --> 50:13.560] Hopefully it will be [50:13.560 --> 50:15.560] And it will help you [50:15.560 --> 50:17.560] It certainly will [50:17.560 --> 50:21.560] And I had someone call in once [50:21.560 --> 50:23.560] Jeff said, we lost him last year [50:23.560 --> 50:25.560] That was a great loss for all of us [50:25.560 --> 50:27.560] But he called me once [50:27.560 --> 50:29.560] And he was surprised that I'd made it on the air once [50:29.560 --> 50:31.560] That I'd made a mistake [50:31.560 --> 50:33.560] And I said, my goodness [50:33.560 --> 50:35.560] I make mistakes all the time [50:35.560 --> 50:37.560] The last thing I want people to do [50:37.560 --> 50:39.560] Is think that I'm some kind of a guru [50:39.560 --> 50:41.560] I'm not [50:41.560 --> 50:45.560] I just have a knowledge in a certain area [50:45.560 --> 50:47.560] And that knowledge is limited [50:47.560 --> 50:51.560] And I struggle not to allow myself [50:51.560 --> 50:55.560] To overstep what I actually know [50:55.560 --> 50:59.560] And so I like it when this kind of thing comes up [50:59.560 --> 51:03.560] It puts me back to work [51:03.560 --> 51:07.560] So this is something I'm going to keep on a separate screen [51:07.560 --> 51:11.560] On my computer system so I don't lose it [51:11.560 --> 51:15.560] And tomorrow night I'll have more to say about that [51:15.560 --> 51:19.560] So do you have anything else for us, Andrew? [51:19.560 --> 51:21.560] No, that's it [51:21.560 --> 51:23.560] Okay, make sure you listen in tomorrow night [51:23.560 --> 51:27.560] I may want you to call back in [51:27.560 --> 51:29.560] All right [51:29.560 --> 51:31.560] Okay, thank you [51:31.560 --> 51:33.560] I've got a radio show [51:33.560 --> 51:35.560] I won't be able to tune in [51:35.560 --> 51:37.560] I'm sorry [51:37.560 --> 51:39.560] Oh, that Andrew [51:39.560 --> 51:41.560] Okay, now I know who you are [51:41.560 --> 51:43.560] Okay [51:43.560 --> 51:47.560] You mean you won't cancel your radio show just to listen to mine? [51:47.560 --> 51:49.560] Oh, I'm crushed [51:49.560 --> 51:51.560] Sorry [51:51.560 --> 51:53.560] I'll listen to the archive, I promise [51:53.560 --> 51:55.560] Okay, thank you, Andrew [51:55.560 --> 51:57.560] Okay, take care [51:57.560 --> 52:01.560] Okay, now we're going to go to Olivier in Tennessee [52:01.560 --> 52:03.560] Hello, Olivier [52:03.560 --> 52:07.560] What have you been up to since we last talked? [52:07.560 --> 52:09.560] I've been good [52:09.560 --> 52:15.560] I was looking at putting a snake fight together [52:15.560 --> 52:21.560] We're going to have a meeting for the community [52:21.560 --> 52:25.560] We're going to let people talk and expose information [52:25.560 --> 52:27.560] As I was doing that [52:27.560 --> 52:29.560] I got a phone call [52:29.560 --> 52:31.560] It was a county man [52:31.560 --> 52:33.560] I'm like, what? [52:33.560 --> 52:35.560] County man? [52:35.560 --> 52:39.560] I didn't expect him to call back [52:39.560 --> 52:43.560] I was just going everywhere, pushing my weight around [52:43.560 --> 52:45.560] Letting everybody know what's coming down the pipeline [52:45.560 --> 52:47.560] But he called me back [52:47.560 --> 52:51.560] He started talking to me [52:51.560 --> 52:55.560] I'm sorry, I couldn't call you back last week [52:55.560 --> 52:57.560] But they told me you had an issue [52:57.560 --> 53:01.560] You addressed it with my clerk [53:01.560 --> 53:03.560] I looked over it [53:03.560 --> 53:05.560] That's why I called you back [53:05.560 --> 53:07.560] So I took over the conversation [53:07.560 --> 53:09.560] I'm like, okay [53:09.560 --> 53:11.560] I didn't expect to get a call back from you [53:11.560 --> 53:15.560] Because of the response that I've been getting from the city [53:15.560 --> 53:17.560] And the police department [53:17.560 --> 53:23.560] And obviously it's a situation that we've been going through [53:23.560 --> 53:25.560] But it boils down to that [53:25.560 --> 53:29.560] Your magistrates are allowing people to be arrested [53:29.560 --> 53:33.560] Without warrants [53:33.560 --> 53:37.560] And they're not allowing them to have counsel [53:37.560 --> 53:43.560] And they're not allowing us to submit to bail [53:43.560 --> 53:45.560] They want us to pay bonds [53:45.560 --> 53:49.560] And that's violating our rights [53:49.560 --> 53:53.560] And those were the issues that I brought to your clerk to address to you [53:53.560 --> 53:55.560] And I'm surprised that you called me back [53:55.560 --> 53:57.560] Because I really didn't expect this [53:57.560 --> 54:01.560] And he was like, what do you mean by bail? [54:01.560 --> 54:03.560] I said, bail, you know [54:03.560 --> 54:05.560] In my head, I'm like, you know what bail is? [54:05.560 --> 54:09.560] I'm like, well, bail is where I put up my property [54:09.560 --> 54:11.560] Or property that I have [54:11.560 --> 54:15.560] I guess appended certain charges so I can get relief [54:15.560 --> 54:19.560] For me to come back to court [54:19.560 --> 54:21.560] Just like bond is bond [54:21.560 --> 54:23.560] You pay a corporation money [54:23.560 --> 54:25.560] Which you don't receive back [54:25.560 --> 54:27.560] And they do with your fees [54:27.560 --> 54:29.560] And they take care of you [54:29.560 --> 54:31.560] Or they're responsible for bringing you to court [54:31.560 --> 54:33.560] Wait, hold on [54:33.560 --> 54:37.560] When you pay a bondsman [54:37.560 --> 54:39.560] They put up bail [54:39.560 --> 54:45.560] They've got money or property they have set aside [54:45.560 --> 54:49.560] And they pledge that property [54:49.560 --> 54:51.560] Against the bond [54:51.560 --> 54:55.560] So they actually put up their bail for you [54:55.560 --> 54:57.560] Yeah, we understand that [54:57.560 --> 55:01.560] But he doesn't understand that [55:01.560 --> 55:05.560] I think he probably does [55:05.560 --> 55:07.560] Huh? [55:07.560 --> 55:09.560] I think he probably does [55:09.560 --> 55:11.560] He wants you to think he does [55:11.560 --> 55:13.560] Does it make no sense? [55:13.560 --> 55:17.560] Well, the way I see it [55:17.560 --> 55:21.560] He's thinking the way that it's supposed to go [55:21.560 --> 55:25.560] Is you go to jail and you pay somebody bond to get out [55:25.560 --> 55:27.560] Bail and bond was the same thing [55:27.560 --> 55:29.560] That's what [55:29.560 --> 55:31.560] He didn't argue anything [55:31.560 --> 55:35.560] And he basically agreed with everything that I was saying [55:35.560 --> 55:39.560] Because as I was talking to him [55:39.560 --> 55:41.560] I was explaining to him that [55:41.560 --> 55:45.560] Hey, you know, I've got almost 28 suits at the federal court right now [55:45.560 --> 55:49.560] Because of the interactions that have been happening between me and the city [55:49.560 --> 55:53.560] And I have like seven or eight costs of imprisonment suits [55:53.560 --> 55:55.560] And that's how I became aware of this situation [55:55.560 --> 55:59.560] Because I was being brought to your county jail by the city [55:59.560 --> 56:03.560] And they don't even have authority to do traffic [56:03.560 --> 56:05.560] And I'm running through all this thing [56:05.560 --> 56:09.560] And he was like, wait, Mr. Libby, you have suits against his manageships? [56:09.560 --> 56:11.560] I'm like, yes, I do [56:11.560 --> 56:15.560] And he's like, oh, Mr. Libby, I can't speak to you anymore [56:15.560 --> 56:19.560] I had a solution to the problem [56:19.560 --> 56:22.560] But I can't tell you because you have suits [56:22.560 --> 56:24.560] I didn't know you had a legal situation [56:24.560 --> 56:25.560] I can't speak to you [56:25.560 --> 56:27.560] I'm like, well, I understand what you're saying [56:27.560 --> 56:30.560] And I don't have no problem with that [56:30.560 --> 56:34.560] I don't really care about calling you to talk about the suits, per se [56:34.560 --> 56:37.560] Because this is an ongoing problem [56:37.560 --> 56:42.560] I wanted to be able to bring it to your attention for the rest of the community [56:42.560 --> 56:46.560] Because the rest of the community is the ones that are going to deal with it [56:46.560 --> 56:53.560] And I've done the same thing with Carchfield Carchfield Police in the city [56:53.560 --> 57:00.560] I communicated with them for two years before I began filing suits [57:00.560 --> 57:09.560] And pressing on the judicial side of things [57:09.560 --> 57:10.560] And he was like, two years? [57:10.560 --> 57:12.560] I said, yes, I've been communicating [57:12.560 --> 57:15.560] And going through the research and learning the law [57:15.560 --> 57:17.560] I've realized the different branches of government [57:17.560 --> 57:19.560] I didn't even understand that County Mayor existed [57:19.560 --> 57:26.560] I would have called you a long time ago if I knew that I would have got a response that I'm getting now [57:26.560 --> 57:32.560] Because you've actually called me back with a solution [57:32.560 --> 57:35.560] I've been talking to the city for two years [57:35.560 --> 57:42.560] And they're telling me basically to, you know, buzz off [57:42.560 --> 57:44.560] And then I'm like, you know what I'm saying? [57:44.560 --> 57:47.560] And he was like, well, I'm very sorry that this happened [57:47.560 --> 57:53.560] And I do have a solution to it [57:53.560 --> 57:58.560] I hope I'm not making you upset by telling you that I can't tell you about it [57:58.560 --> 58:02.560] Because of the lawsuits that are pending [58:02.560 --> 58:08.560] But I said, I'm not trying to take you up because I got 28 [58:08.560 --> 58:10.560] I don't want any more [58:10.560 --> 58:12.560] I'm going to just file against you, I don't want no more [58:12.560 --> 58:14.560] I've been trying to communicate [58:14.560 --> 58:16.560] I've communicated with them for two years [58:16.560 --> 58:18.560] I'm trying to communicate with you [58:18.560 --> 58:20.560] And you responded back [58:20.560 --> 58:22.560] And I'm happy with your response [58:22.560 --> 58:24.560] But did you call me back with a positive response? [58:24.560 --> 58:26.560] I have a solution [58:26.560 --> 58:28.560] Okay, hang on [58:28.560 --> 58:30.560] Can you talk about how to handle that on the other side? [58:30.560 --> 58:32.560] I think you already know that [58:32.560 --> 58:34.560] But for everybody else [58:34.560 --> 58:37.560] This is Randy Kelton, Denver Stevens, Google Bell Radio [58:37.560 --> 58:41.560] I call it number 512-646-1984 [58:41.560 --> 58:46.560] We'll be right back [59:11.560 --> 59:16.560] We'll be right back [59:41.560 --> 59:45.560] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network [59:45.560 --> 59:50.560] At LogosRadioNetwork.com [59:50.560 --> 59:54.560] The following these flashes brought to you by [59:54.560 --> 59:56.560] The Lone Star Blowdown [59:56.560 --> 59:59.560] Providing the tele-bulletins for the commodity market [59:59.560 --> 01:00:01.560] Today in history [01:00:01.560 --> 01:00:03.560] The Lone Star Blowdown [01:00:03.560 --> 01:00:06.560] Providing the tele-bulletins for the commodity market [01:00:06.560 --> 01:00:08.560] The Lone Star Blowdown [01:00:08.560 --> 01:00:11.560] Providing the tele-bulletins for the commodity market [01:00:11.560 --> 01:00:13.560] Today in history [01:00:13.560 --> 01:00:15.560] News updates [01:00:15.560 --> 01:00:20.560] And the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative [01:00:20.560 --> 01:00:26.560] Markets for Wednesday, the 11th of January, 2017 [01:00:26.560 --> 01:00:30.560] Are currently trading with gold at $1,194.10 an ounce [01:00:30.560 --> 01:00:32.560] Silver, $16.75 an ounce [01:00:32.560 --> 01:00:35.560] Texas crude, $50.82 a barrel [01:00:35.560 --> 01:00:44.560] And Bitcoin is down at $776 U.S. dollars [01:00:44.560 --> 01:00:45.560] Today in history [01:00:45.560 --> 01:00:47.560] The year, 1964 [01:00:47.560 --> 01:00:51.560] The Surgeon General of the United States at the time, Dr. Luther Terry [01:00:51.560 --> 01:00:53.560] Published a landmark report, Smoking and Health [01:00:53.560 --> 01:00:57.560] A report of the advisory committee to the Surgeon General of the United States [01:00:57.560 --> 01:01:00.560] Stating that smoking may be hazardous to one's health [01:01:00.560 --> 01:01:05.560] Today in history [01:01:05.560 --> 01:01:06.560] And recent news [01:01:06.560 --> 01:01:10.560] President Barack Obama gave his farewell address to the nation from Chicago last night [01:01:10.560 --> 01:01:14.560] Where he highlighted some of his claims to success during his presidency [01:01:14.560 --> 01:01:17.560] Like, in his words, reversing a great recession [01:01:17.560 --> 01:01:19.560] Rebooting the U.S. auto industry [01:01:19.560 --> 01:01:21.560] The longest stretch of job creation [01:01:21.560 --> 01:01:23.560] Opening commercial relations with Cuba [01:01:23.560 --> 01:01:26.560] Shutting down Iran's nuclear weapons program [01:01:26.560 --> 01:01:28.560] Taking out the mastermind of 9-11 [01:01:28.560 --> 01:01:31.560] Marriage equality and securing the right of health insurance [01:01:31.560 --> 01:01:34.560] For another 20 million citizens via Obamacare [01:01:34.560 --> 01:01:37.560] He also discussed some of the issues still needing governmental attention [01:01:37.560 --> 01:01:40.560] Like growing inequality, demographic changes [01:01:40.560 --> 01:01:42.560] And the increasing use of terrorism [01:01:42.560 --> 01:01:46.560] The full speech can be found on YouTube along with the transcript online [01:01:51.560 --> 01:01:55.560] President-elect Donald J. Trump held his first news conference in Manhattan today [01:01:55.560 --> 01:02:00.560] When asked about the allegations of Russia hacking DNC emails last fall [01:02:00.560 --> 01:02:02.560] Trump responded by saying, quote, [01:02:02.560 --> 01:02:04.560] As far as hacking, I think it was Russia [01:02:04.560 --> 01:02:08.560] But I think we also got hacked by every other country and other people [01:02:08.560 --> 01:02:13.560] I have to say this, also, the Democratic National Committee was totally open to be hacked [01:02:13.560 --> 01:02:14.560] They did a very poor job [01:02:14.560 --> 01:02:18.560] They could have had hacking defense, which we had [01:02:18.560 --> 01:02:22.560] Trump then went on to have a verbal confrontation with a heckling CNN news reporter [01:02:22.560 --> 01:02:24.560] Who he would refuse to call on [01:02:24.560 --> 01:02:26.560] And went as far as to say that, quote, [01:02:26.560 --> 01:02:27.560] Don't be rude [01:02:27.560 --> 01:02:29.560] No, I'm not going to give you a question [01:02:29.560 --> 01:02:31.560] I'm not going to give you a question [01:02:31.560 --> 01:02:54.560] You are in fake news [01:03:31.560 --> 01:03:34.560] But I'm going to give you a question [01:03:34.560 --> 01:03:51.560] I'm not going to give you a question [01:03:51.560 --> 01:03:54.560] Chant down Babylon and do it daily [01:03:54.560 --> 01:03:58.560] And when night come, you forget me for a day [01:03:58.560 --> 01:04:01.560] So one by one, me have to chant them, man [01:04:01.560 --> 01:04:05.560] Me chant down Babylon because Babylon is one [01:04:05.560 --> 01:04:08.560] The only right man, me say, is the rest, come on [01:04:08.560 --> 01:04:12.560] We take, me say, Lord, man, the bow, yeah, me man [01:04:12.560 --> 01:04:15.560] To chant down Babylon now, not later [01:04:15.560 --> 01:04:19.560] To let Babylon know, say, we get him greater [01:04:19.560 --> 01:04:22.560] We bite the donkey, me say, to tell a lie [01:04:22.560 --> 01:04:40.560] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Devin Stevens, Rue of La Radio, and we're talking to Olivier, kicked their behinds in Tennessee. Olivier, it sounds like you're really getting everybody's attention. [01:04:40.560 --> 01:04:44.560] Right, and is that why he's a real nice guy? [01:04:44.560 --> 01:04:57.560] Well, yeah, now he's nice because you stuck into him, but while he may not be able to present this to you, his lawyers certainly can. [01:04:57.560 --> 01:05:04.560] So I don't know what he's saying that, oh, I got this solution, but I can't tell you what it is. [01:05:04.560 --> 01:05:10.560] He didn't say, I got this solution, and we can have our lawyers tell you what it is. [01:05:10.560 --> 01:05:22.560] Look, I'm suing him, and by him telling me the solution is going to be him, I'll open out admitting to all the violations that they've been committing. [01:05:22.560 --> 01:05:28.560] Like, I understand, I told him, I'm not trying to entrap you in anything here, understand what you mean. [01:05:28.560 --> 01:05:33.560] Because if you tell me how you're going to fix it, you know what I'm saying? [01:05:33.560 --> 01:05:41.560] Then it's going to be an open testimony that you've been breaking the law. [01:05:41.560 --> 01:05:46.560] I told him, listen, I don't want anything, I don't want no quarrel with you. [01:05:46.560 --> 01:05:49.560] I'm just trying to give you an opportunity to do something about it. [01:05:49.560 --> 01:05:58.560] So I understand the language that you're talking about, because he told me that he had a solution to it before he realized that I'm suing him. [01:05:58.560 --> 01:06:09.560] No, I don't think so. The likelihood, you have this many suits against them, then what is the likelihood he doesn't know about that? [01:06:09.560 --> 01:06:20.560] What is the likelihood anyone working for the city or the county doesn't know you have all these suits against them? [01:06:20.560 --> 01:06:24.560] I'm going to say somewhere between little and none. [01:06:24.560 --> 01:06:29.560] Well, the thing is, they haven't let him, most of them, they haven't even let him be served. [01:06:29.560 --> 01:06:34.560] They're so espontane dismissal, so he doesn't know about me yet. [01:06:34.560 --> 01:06:42.560] When I called, I left a message with her saying that I was going to file a suit Friday, tomorrow, if I didn't hear back from them. [01:06:42.560 --> 01:06:50.560] So all he knows is that I ran into this problem and I plan on filing a suit Friday, tomorrow. [01:06:50.560 --> 01:06:58.560] So he thinks you're, he thought you were just cranking up. He didn't realize you'd already been working him over. [01:06:58.560 --> 01:07:05.560] Exactly. Exactly, because after I explained everything to him, he told me that I found a solution to it. [01:07:05.560 --> 01:07:15.560] But then I told him that after I was explaining how I got to the problem, I explained to him that I had to file a suit against everybody, including those judges. [01:07:15.560 --> 01:07:20.560] He said, you filed a suit against the judges too? I said, yes. He's like, man, they work for the county. [01:07:20.560 --> 01:07:27.560] I'm like, I'm sorry. And he's like, well, I can't tell you anything else because you're suing us. [01:07:27.560 --> 01:07:33.560] I'm like, I understand, but I'm not trying to trap you. I'm not calling you about those prior suits. [01:07:33.560 --> 01:07:39.560] That is done. I already have the information I need on that. I'm not trying to get anything else from you. [01:07:39.560 --> 01:07:46.560] I'm just voicing the true concern for the rest of the community. If you want to do something about it, fine. [01:07:46.560 --> 01:07:52.560] Because this is not the response that I got from the city. The city treated me like a dog. [01:07:52.560 --> 01:07:59.560] It took my properties, took everything I had and told me they did well. [01:07:59.560 --> 01:08:05.560] And I told them I was going to sue them and they told me good luck. [01:08:05.560 --> 01:08:12.560] But you, I told you, hey, we got a problem. You called me within seven days telling me that you have a solution to it. [01:08:12.560 --> 01:08:19.560] I don't want no quarrel with you, sir. I don't want no problem with you that I've already started with. [01:08:19.560 --> 01:08:32.560] That is probably the best way that you could have handled him because you let him know that he is not important enough for you to care about. [01:08:32.560 --> 01:08:36.560] That was probably the last thing he wanted to hear. [01:08:36.560 --> 01:08:41.560] Yeah. Well, no, it's not that. It's the way he was responsive. [01:08:41.560 --> 01:08:46.560] And if you're responsive, I'm cool with you. I'm not going to attack you. You're trying to work with the community. [01:08:46.560 --> 01:08:52.560] You're responsive. You're doing your job. You're listening to us. You're moving your hand towards our direction. [01:08:52.560 --> 01:08:59.560] But if you didn't call me or whatever, okay, I got to bring you to the table. I got to bring you in front of a judge. [01:08:59.560 --> 01:09:12.560] He was very concerned about it. When he said that I found a solution, I have a way to fix it, it's not like, oh, I'm thinking about it. [01:09:12.560 --> 01:09:16.560] It's like, hey, this is what we're going to do about it to fix that. [01:09:16.560 --> 01:09:20.560] And I said, hey, I don't care what you're going to do about it. [01:09:20.560 --> 01:09:28.560] If you look at it and you understand where I'm coming from and you're taking your own initiative to fix it, I commend you. [01:09:28.560 --> 01:09:31.560] I don't want nothing else to do with you. I'm going to leave you alone. [01:09:31.560 --> 01:09:35.560] Next time I find something else, I'm going to come bring it to your address, you know what I'm saying? [01:09:35.560 --> 01:09:43.560] Because I did the same thing to Conchell for two years. For two years, they told me to buzz off. But you didn't. [01:09:43.560 --> 01:09:46.560] I called you and seven days, you called me back. [01:09:46.560 --> 01:09:51.560] You've got to know how powerful that is. [01:09:51.560 --> 01:09:56.560] Yeah, no assistant. He called me back directly, you know what I'm saying? I can hear his voice. [01:09:56.560 --> 01:10:01.560] I mean, your your response to him. [01:10:01.560 --> 01:10:07.560] Because now he's going to tell everybody what is your problem with this guy? [01:10:07.560 --> 01:10:14.560] I talked to him. He was just fine. He's not crazy. He's not hard to get along with. [01:10:14.560 --> 01:10:18.560] He's easy to deal with. What is your problem? [01:10:18.560 --> 01:10:24.560] This is going to give you more credibility. [01:10:24.560 --> 01:10:31.560] It's kind of like when I didn't go after that bagler who broke my elbow. [01:10:31.560 --> 01:10:37.560] Didn't they all realize that this guy's the real deal? [01:10:37.560 --> 01:10:46.560] And if the judge of the commissioner's court of the county called you directly, [01:10:46.560 --> 01:10:51.560] he had to know about your suits against the city. [01:10:51.560 --> 01:10:55.560] Or he wouldn't have called. They very seldom ever called anybody. [01:10:55.560 --> 01:11:01.560] He's essentially the highest ranking guy in the county. [01:11:01.560 --> 01:11:02.560] You talking about the mayor? [01:11:02.560 --> 01:11:07.560] Yeah. He knew what was going on. [01:11:07.560 --> 01:11:10.560] I called his assistant last week and told her about it. [01:11:10.560 --> 01:11:15.560] She told me that he wasn't there. I'm like, well, she's like, but he'll call you back his number. [01:11:15.560 --> 01:11:23.560] I leave my number, but let me give you the information before he calls me because I don't want him to call me unaware. [01:11:23.560 --> 01:11:27.560] I gave her all the details. She wrote it there. [01:11:27.560 --> 01:11:38.560] When he got the paper, all he had to do was call up his lawyers or go look up the law and verify it. [01:11:38.560 --> 01:11:41.560] That is absolutely the best way to handle these guys. [01:11:41.560 --> 01:11:48.560] I have a lot of people trying to take on the system, but they do it for the most part. [01:11:48.560 --> 01:11:52.560] They don't take on the system until they're really angry. [01:11:52.560 --> 01:12:01.560] And then they deal with the system from a combative perspective. [01:12:01.560 --> 01:12:08.560] It just doesn't work well. The way you're doing it works really well. [01:12:08.560 --> 01:12:15.560] When they have someone that's cool and calm and determined, knows exactly what he wants, [01:12:15.560 --> 01:12:18.560] that makes you really, really dangerous. [01:12:18.560 --> 01:12:29.560] Makes you somebody they can't manipulate, somebody they can't deal with. Perfect. [01:12:29.560 --> 01:12:36.560] I would like you to reach around behind yourself and pat yourself on the back. [01:12:36.560 --> 01:12:39.560] But not too hard. [01:12:39.560 --> 01:12:47.560] I have sprained my wrist doing that on time, on occasion. [01:12:47.560 --> 01:12:53.560] So has anything else occurred in the last week? [01:12:53.560 --> 01:12:57.560] No, obviously, leaving us alone. [01:12:57.560 --> 01:13:02.560] Well, my friend did get pulled over about a week or so ago, and then as he got pulled over, [01:13:02.560 --> 01:13:06.560] he was pulling out his phone. The cop came up to the phone and was like, what you doing? [01:13:06.560 --> 01:13:09.560] I'm going to call my lawyer. He's like, he's calling. I'm going to call all of them. [01:13:09.560 --> 01:13:11.560] He's like, no, don't call nobody. Don't call nobody. [01:13:11.560 --> 01:13:18.560] And then the other two cops pulled up, and then the other two cops I have on, they didn't even step out the car. [01:13:18.560 --> 01:13:22.560] They called that cop towards him, and they spoke to him for a second. [01:13:22.560 --> 01:13:28.560] And then my friend said that the other cop, the cop who pulled him over, came back to the car, [01:13:28.560 --> 01:13:32.560] with a very change of attitude and everything, a good, nice cop. [01:13:32.560 --> 01:13:37.560] He's like, well, you know, I have to give you this citation because I stopped you, [01:13:37.560 --> 01:13:41.560] and it's 101, 10-101 again. [01:13:41.560 --> 01:13:45.560] We already had that beat, so we just went, okay. [01:13:45.560 --> 01:13:47.560] Because they usually take us for jail whenever they pull us over. [01:13:47.560 --> 01:13:55.560] This time, they didn't even take his ID or anything. They just gave him a 10-101 and let him go. [01:13:55.560 --> 01:13:58.560] That's improving. [01:13:58.560 --> 01:14:01.560] And I have a bright yellow taxi cab that my brother gave me. [01:14:01.560 --> 01:14:05.560] My uncle gave me from New York, so they know that they will ask about it. [01:14:05.560 --> 01:14:09.560] They saw that he pulled over the wrong car. [01:14:09.560 --> 01:14:13.560] So they started telling him, like, listen, what you doing? [01:14:13.560 --> 01:14:16.560] He's going to have you on paper. [01:14:16.560 --> 01:14:19.560] Wonderful. This is the way it generally works. [01:14:19.560 --> 01:14:26.560] We have Scott in Garland, and he's having the same kind of experience. [01:14:26.560 --> 01:14:31.560] They pull in behind him for a while, and then they pull off and hit the road. [01:14:31.560 --> 01:14:36.560] They don't want anything to do with it. [01:14:36.560 --> 01:14:38.560] So good. [01:14:38.560 --> 01:14:46.560] Yeah, I also got with the NAACP, and through putting everything on paper [01:14:46.560 --> 01:14:52.560] and explaining, getting the law dictionaries, throwing words at them and meaning them right, [01:14:52.560 --> 01:14:58.560] now I got him hooked, and especially after the county mayor called me. [01:14:58.560 --> 01:15:03.560] Now I got him hooked to, like, okay, he got something, write it up, [01:15:03.560 --> 01:15:07.560] and we're going to go present it to the national in Washington, [01:15:07.560 --> 01:15:11.560] because he said that if the mayor calls you, this is correct. [01:15:11.560 --> 01:15:15.560] This is on a national level, because it's not only for law here. [01:15:15.560 --> 01:15:19.560] So he's going to send it to NAACP in Washington after we get done with it. [01:15:19.560 --> 01:15:25.560] We're supposed to be having a meeting somewhere in between the 25th and 29th. [01:15:25.560 --> 01:15:27.560] Oh, wonderful. [01:15:27.560 --> 01:15:33.560] Wow, if they pick this up, you'll be a hero in Tennessee. [01:15:33.560 --> 01:15:39.560] And they've been trying to go after the judicial system for decades now. [01:15:39.560 --> 01:15:42.560] They just didn't know how to get in there. [01:15:42.560 --> 01:15:45.560] They didn't know how to expose them. [01:15:45.560 --> 01:15:52.560] Maybe you can bring this method to them, and they'll get it figured out. [01:15:52.560 --> 01:15:57.560] They'll start doing this elsewhere. [01:15:57.560 --> 01:15:58.560] Yeah. [01:15:58.560 --> 01:16:05.560] I could not think of a more effective outcome than have the NAACP [01:16:05.560 --> 01:16:14.560] show people around the country how to go after these guys using your method. [01:16:14.560 --> 01:16:18.560] Not bad for Tennessee Hill, Billy. [01:16:18.560 --> 01:16:21.560] Not bad. [01:16:21.560 --> 01:16:22.560] Okay. [01:16:22.560 --> 01:16:24.560] We're about to go to break. [01:16:24.560 --> 01:16:26.560] Thank you, Oliver. [01:16:26.560 --> 01:16:30.560] Well, Oliver, thank you, Olivier. [01:16:30.560 --> 01:16:33.560] Keep up the good work and keep us up to date. [01:16:33.560 --> 01:16:34.560] All right. [01:16:34.560 --> 01:16:35.560] Okay. [01:16:35.560 --> 01:16:38.560] This is Randy Kelton and Deborah Stevens with URO Radio. [01:16:38.560 --> 01:16:43.560] I'll call it number 512-646-1984. [01:16:43.560 --> 01:16:46.560] And Mark Oregon, I see you there. [01:16:46.560 --> 01:16:48.560] We'll pick you up on the other side. [01:16:48.560 --> 01:16:59.560] We'll be right back. [01:16:59.560 --> 01:17:00.560] I love logos. [01:17:00.560 --> 01:17:04.560] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [01:17:04.560 --> 01:17:06.560] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [01:17:06.560 --> 01:17:07.560] I need my truth fix. [01:17:07.560 --> 01:17:09.560] I'd be lost without logos. [01:17:09.560 --> 01:17:12.560] And I really want to help keep this network on the air. [01:17:12.560 --> 01:17:15.560] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, [01:17:15.560 --> 01:17:19.560] and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [01:17:19.560 --> 01:17:21.560] How can I help logos? [01:17:21.560 --> 01:17:23.560] Well, I'm glad you asked. [01:17:23.560 --> 01:17:26.560] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. [01:17:26.560 --> 01:17:28.560] You can order new supplies or holiday gifts. [01:17:28.560 --> 01:17:30.560] The first thing you do is clear your cookies. [01:17:30.560 --> 01:17:34.560] Now, go to logosradionetwork.com. [01:17:34.560 --> 01:17:37.560] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [01:17:37.560 --> 01:17:42.560] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and logos gets a few pesos. [01:17:42.560 --> 01:17:43.560] Do I pay extra? [01:17:43.560 --> 01:17:44.560] No. [01:17:44.560 --> 01:17:46.560] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [01:17:46.560 --> 01:17:47.560] No. [01:17:47.560 --> 01:17:48.560] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [01:17:48.560 --> 01:17:49.560] No. [01:17:49.560 --> 01:17:50.560] I mean, yes. [01:17:50.560 --> 01:17:53.560] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money. [01:17:53.560 --> 01:17:55.560] This is perfect. [01:17:55.560 --> 01:17:56.560] Thank you so much. [01:17:56.560 --> 01:17:57.560] You're welcome. [01:17:57.560 --> 01:17:59.560] Happy holidays, logos. [01:18:27.560 --> 01:18:29.560] Thank you so much. [01:18:57.560 --> 01:19:00.560] To learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:19:00.560 --> 01:19:28.560] This is the logos, the logos, the radio net. [01:19:30.560 --> 01:19:52.560] Thank you so much. [01:19:52.560 --> 01:20:20.560] Thank you so much. [01:20:20.560 --> 01:20:38.560] Thank you so much. [01:20:38.560 --> 01:20:39.560] Okay. [01:20:39.560 --> 01:20:40.560] We are back. [01:20:40.560 --> 01:20:45.560] We're into Calvin Derbysheva's Rue La Radio, and we're going to Mark in Oregon. [01:20:45.560 --> 01:20:47.560] Hello, Mark. [01:20:47.560 --> 01:20:50.560] Good evening. [01:20:50.560 --> 01:20:54.560] I just wanted to expand a little bit first on what Deborah was talking about earlier [01:20:54.560 --> 01:20:56.560] on supporting you folks. [01:20:56.560 --> 01:21:01.560] And you've been a fabulous resource for myself and friends of mine. [01:21:01.560 --> 01:21:09.560] I think I started listening to you around five, six years ago, and we had some very [01:21:09.560 --> 01:21:17.560] major successes, got one person an extra year in their home, another family. [01:21:17.560 --> 01:21:22.560] It's been four years since their foreclosure was rescinded by the bank, and they're still [01:21:22.560 --> 01:21:24.560] living in the same home. [01:21:24.560 --> 01:21:30.560] And how I chose to, one of the ways I chose to support you folks, and I wish I could do [01:21:30.560 --> 01:21:34.560] more, is I signed up with Young Jevity through you about three and a half years ago, and [01:21:34.560 --> 01:21:39.560] we got a number of folks in my downline, and I'm a big Young Jevity user, and I know it [01:21:39.560 --> 01:21:45.560] works great for me and others, and will no doubt continue to use it for many years to [01:21:45.560 --> 01:21:46.560] come. [01:21:46.560 --> 01:21:49.560] So anyway, I just wanted to make sure that folks understand there's more than one way [01:21:49.560 --> 01:21:53.560] to help you folks out, and even a couple of them wouldn't hurt. [01:21:53.560 --> 01:22:00.560] We sure appreciate it, because we need all the help we can get to keep this thing open. [01:22:00.560 --> 01:22:05.560] I mean, if anybody looks at, you know, we're trying to get $10,000. [01:22:05.560 --> 01:22:12.560] You know, $10,000 would put any person well below the poverty line. [01:22:12.560 --> 01:22:20.560] To support a radio station of this magnitude, that's really chump change. [01:22:20.560 --> 01:22:28.560] A lot of us broadcasters pitch in our own money to keep this going. [01:22:28.560 --> 01:22:38.560] So any help we can get, this fundraiser won't be enough to support the entire station. [01:22:38.560 --> 01:22:45.560] We have to have, we've got sponsors, but we also, most of us broadcasters pitch in as [01:22:45.560 --> 01:22:47.560] well to keep this thing going. [01:22:47.560 --> 01:22:54.560] So we do really appreciate your support. [01:22:54.560 --> 01:22:56.560] This is worth the time. [01:22:56.560 --> 01:23:06.560] I spend a lot of time on this project, but at the end of the day, when I get down to [01:23:06.560 --> 01:23:12.560] the end of my life and I look back on it and ask myself, okay, in all this time you had, [01:23:12.560 --> 01:23:17.560] what did you do that was of value? [01:23:17.560 --> 01:23:23.560] And I'll get to look at this as one of those things that I did that was of value. [01:23:23.560 --> 01:23:26.560] And I do, this cost me a lot. [01:23:26.560 --> 01:23:27.560] It's cost me a lot of time. [01:23:27.560 --> 01:23:32.560] It's cost me a lot of money to do this, but it's been worth every dime. [01:23:32.560 --> 01:23:35.560] And it's been worth every minute I put on the air. [01:23:35.560 --> 01:23:39.560] And I greatly appreciate everybody that listens. [01:23:39.560 --> 01:23:47.560] I don't get a whole lot of feedback, so the feedback we do get is wonderful. [01:23:47.560 --> 01:23:53.560] Mark, did you have any kind of issue you wanted to bring? [01:23:53.560 --> 01:23:54.560] Well, unfortunately, yes. [01:23:54.560 --> 01:24:03.560] I've managed to get myself smeared in the family law arena or whatever arbitrary mess [01:24:03.560 --> 01:24:05.560] they choose, it seems like. [01:24:05.560 --> 01:24:09.560] Unfortunately, relative to the banks and transportation, all things that seem more [01:24:09.560 --> 01:24:16.560] black and white, whether they abide by its mother story, of course, the family law is [01:24:16.560 --> 01:24:22.560] in a little bit of a conundrum in terms of how to approach or work with these folks. [01:24:22.560 --> 01:24:28.560] The short story is when one of my sons came to live with me, I stopped paying for his [01:24:28.560 --> 01:24:30.560] portion of the child support. [01:24:30.560 --> 01:24:33.560] But, of course, it doesn't work that simply for them. [01:24:33.560 --> 01:24:40.560] They believe and will keep charging you and racking up the numbers until they approve [01:24:40.560 --> 01:24:44.560] of whatever modification plan that you request. [01:24:44.560 --> 01:24:54.560] So it could be months or even longer before you actually have a change in your child support. [01:24:54.560 --> 01:25:01.560] And anyway, jumping ahead, they acknowledged his change of status from his mom to myself [01:25:01.560 --> 01:25:03.560] and yada, yada, yada. [01:25:03.560 --> 01:25:07.560] But the numbers kept racking up because they didn't like my modification. [01:25:07.560 --> 01:25:08.560] It was late. [01:25:08.560 --> 01:25:10.560] And then they didn't like how I did it, so they ignored it. [01:25:10.560 --> 01:25:15.560] And now they've got some crazy numbers that they think I owe them, even though they acknowledge [01:25:15.560 --> 01:25:20.560] that he didn't live with his mom for like three years. [01:25:20.560 --> 01:25:24.560] And threatening to pull the driver's license and this, that, and the other thing. [01:25:24.560 --> 01:25:30.560] And a little twist on top of that is this originally was in one state, and I live in [01:25:30.560 --> 01:25:31.560] a different state now. [01:25:31.560 --> 01:25:37.560] And so the current state organ says, well, regardless of what you make or don't make, [01:25:37.560 --> 01:25:45.560] we just have to enforce whatever Washington tells us and pay up. [01:25:45.560 --> 01:25:48.560] And so I'm wondering what you might suggest or where to start, or if you need any more [01:25:48.560 --> 01:25:52.560] details, I can get you some details, but where I might be able to... [01:25:52.560 --> 01:25:54.560] I need more details. [01:25:54.560 --> 01:25:56.560] This is a problem. [01:25:56.560 --> 01:26:04.560] Anybody in a family law situation, you have to be very careful because you tend to have [01:26:04.560 --> 01:26:10.560] an attorney general collecting the child support. [01:26:10.560 --> 01:26:16.560] And somehow they get... [01:26:16.560 --> 01:26:22.560] I'm not familiar with the family law issues, but the attorney general gets paid for collecting [01:26:22.560 --> 01:26:25.560] this child support. [01:26:25.560 --> 01:26:28.560] So they've got a dog in the hunt. [01:26:28.560 --> 01:26:34.560] We had the attorney general from Texas go to Arkansas, pick up a guy who had never been [01:26:34.560 --> 01:26:41.560] to Texas in his life and bring him to Texas because his wife had moved to Texas. [01:26:41.560 --> 01:26:48.560] And he had been sending her money directly instead of through the attorney general. [01:26:48.560 --> 01:26:52.560] And they didn't count any of that. [01:26:52.560 --> 01:26:56.560] She got the money and she had advantage of the money. [01:26:56.560 --> 01:26:58.560] They didn't care. [01:26:58.560 --> 01:27:02.560] And it seems absolutely unjust. [01:27:02.560 --> 01:27:09.560] Are you in an acrimonious relationship with your ex? [01:27:09.560 --> 01:27:14.560] A tear out of a 10, I would say, in terms of being acrimonious, yes. [01:27:14.560 --> 01:27:15.560] Oh, okay. [01:27:15.560 --> 01:27:17.560] So she's going to try to... [01:27:17.560 --> 01:27:27.560] If she were fair, then she could waive this, but if you're acrimonious and anytime you [01:27:27.560 --> 01:27:34.560] have lawyers, they want to put the two in each other's throats so that the lawyers can [01:27:34.560 --> 01:27:37.560] take as much of your estate as possible. [01:27:37.560 --> 01:27:42.560] And then when the lawyers get done, the attorney general steps in and they want to take as [01:27:42.560 --> 01:27:44.560] much as possible. [01:27:44.560 --> 01:27:51.560] Family law is a place for lawyers to make a lot of money. [01:27:51.560 --> 01:27:58.560] From what I've seen in family law, you have a lawyer on each side and both lawyers look [01:27:58.560 --> 01:28:01.560] at the estate of the couple. [01:28:01.560 --> 01:28:10.560] They try to calculate how much of your estate they can swallow before they allow your divorce [01:28:10.560 --> 01:28:13.560] issue to come to resolution. [01:28:13.560 --> 01:28:19.560] So they use up as much of your estate as they can and then they bring a resolution. [01:28:19.560 --> 01:28:24.560] And generally by that time, both parties are broke and then whoever has to pay child support, [01:28:24.560 --> 01:28:29.560] he winds up in big trouble with the attorney general. [01:28:29.560 --> 01:28:33.560] But not having more information, I wouldn't know how to give you an answer. [01:28:33.560 --> 01:28:40.560] If you can write me a timeline, I am not the family law guy, but I got someone who is, [01:28:40.560 --> 01:28:47.560] and I'll get it to Ken and ask Ken to look it over and give me some suggestions. [01:28:47.560 --> 01:28:50.560] Okay, Randy, I'll do that. [01:28:50.560 --> 01:28:53.560] And he generally has some pretty good suggestions. [01:28:53.560 --> 01:28:59.560] I'm trying to get him to write a book on tricks and traps. [01:28:59.560 --> 01:29:04.560] He's really good at knowing the kind of dirty tricks that lawyers pull. [01:29:04.560 --> 01:29:10.560] And he's been helping people here, and boy, they just got a judge out of office. [01:29:10.560 --> 01:29:15.560] They've got two or three more that they're getting sued right now. [01:29:15.560 --> 01:29:17.560] He's really working them over. [01:29:17.560 --> 01:29:19.560] He's got a woman he's working with. [01:29:19.560 --> 01:29:21.560] He's an ex-IRS agent. [01:29:21.560 --> 01:29:24.560] And boy, they hate it when they see her coming. [01:29:24.560 --> 01:29:31.560] So I'll get this to Ken and get you some suggestions on how to handle this. [01:29:31.560 --> 01:29:34.560] All right, appreciate it, Randy. I'll put that together and get it to you. [01:29:34.560 --> 01:29:36.560] Okay, thank you, Mark. [01:29:36.560 --> 01:29:40.560] This is Randy Kelton Dever-Steves, the ruler of our radio. [01:29:40.560 --> 01:29:44.560] I'll call it number 512-646-1984. [01:29:44.560 --> 01:29:46.560] We'll be right back. [01:29:46.560 --> 01:30:02.560] Music [01:30:02.560 --> 01:30:05.560] Attention, morning coffee drinkers. [01:30:05.560 --> 01:30:10.560] The FBI says if you paid cash for that cup of Joe, you may be a potential terrorist. [01:30:10.560 --> 01:30:15.560] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you how the Feds want to track your coffee habits next. [01:30:15.560 --> 01:30:17.560] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:17.560 --> 01:30:21.560] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:21.560 --> 01:30:26.560] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:26.560 --> 01:30:28.560] So protect your rights. [01:30:28.560 --> 01:30:31.560] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:31.560 --> 01:30:34.560] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [01:30:34.560 --> 01:30:37.560] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:30:37.560 --> 01:30:41.560] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:41.560 --> 01:30:45.560] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:45.560 --> 01:30:47.560] What does a terrorist look like? [01:30:47.560 --> 01:30:51.560] According to the FBI, it could be anyone who cares about privacy, [01:30:51.560 --> 01:30:55.560] shielding their IP address on the web and always paying with cash. [01:30:55.560 --> 01:31:01.560] No joke, pay cash for a cup of coffee, and the FBI says you too may be a potential criminal. [01:31:01.560 --> 01:31:05.560] It's all on a flyer the FBI is circulating among Internet cafe owners, [01:31:05.560 --> 01:31:07.560] urging them to spy on their patrons. [01:31:07.560 --> 01:31:10.560] Are customers hiding their screens from view? [01:31:10.560 --> 01:31:16.560] Are they making voice-over IP calls or using Google Earth to look at, say, train stations? [01:31:16.560 --> 01:31:20.560] Report them all, says the FBI, and become a member of the police state. [01:31:20.560 --> 01:31:30.560] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:30.560 --> 01:31:35.560] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:35.560 --> 01:31:37.560] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:37.560 --> 01:31:42.560] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:42.560 --> 01:31:45.560] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:45.560 --> 01:31:48.560] And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:48.560 --> 01:31:49.560] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:49.560 --> 01:31:50.560] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:50.560 --> 01:31:51.560] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:51.560 --> 01:31:52.560] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:52.560 --> 01:31:54.560] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:54.560 --> 01:31:57.560] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:57.560 --> 01:32:00.560] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:00.560 --> 01:32:02.560] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. [01:32:02.560 --> 01:32:05.560] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:05.560 --> 01:32:08.560] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails. [01:32:08.560 --> 01:32:10.560] But good luck getting them to pay for it. [01:32:10.560 --> 01:32:12.560] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails. [01:32:12.560 --> 01:32:13.560] But I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:13.560 --> 01:32:15.560] That's why you have insurance. [01:32:15.560 --> 01:32:20.560] And Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:20.560 --> 01:32:26.560] And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. [01:32:26.560 --> 01:32:31.560] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [01:32:31.560 --> 01:32:37.560] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:37.560 --> 01:32:40.560] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off. [01:32:40.560 --> 01:32:44.560] And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:44.560 --> 01:32:49.560] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:49.560 --> 01:32:55.560] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:55.560 --> 01:32:58.560] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:58.560 --> 01:33:01.560] I may not actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:01.560 --> 01:33:04.560] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. [01:33:04.560 --> 01:33:31.560] Logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:34.560 --> 01:33:37.560] . [01:33:37.560 --> 01:33:40.560] . [01:33:40.560 --> 01:33:43.560] . [01:33:43.560 --> 01:33:46.560] . [01:33:46.560 --> 01:33:49.560] . [01:33:49.560 --> 01:33:52.560] . [01:33:52.560 --> 01:33:55.560] . [01:33:55.560 --> 01:33:58.560] . [01:33:58.560 --> 01:34:01.560] . [01:34:01.560 --> 01:34:18.840] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton and Debra Siegwitz, we are here on the radio and Debra [01:34:18.840 --> 01:34:23.440] has looked up and addressed the issue where I was dumped earlier. [01:34:23.440 --> 01:34:27.320] Debra, you want to take this over? [01:34:27.320 --> 01:34:29.960] Sure, thanks Randy. [01:34:29.960 --> 01:34:36.960] Yes, and folks, just so that you realize out there, we are not constitutional experts for [01:34:36.960 --> 01:34:45.920] one thing, so if you hit us up with some kind of random or obscure question of what the [01:34:45.920 --> 01:34:51.800] interpretation of a specific clause buried in the Constitution is, don't expect us to [01:34:51.800 --> 01:34:54.480] have the answer for you right off the bat. [01:34:54.480 --> 01:35:00.480] We are not constitutional experts, Randy mostly deals with state criminal law, statute, Eddie [01:35:00.480 --> 01:35:09.760] deals with mostly state transportation code, I deal with some civil type of issues at the [01:35:09.760 --> 01:35:20.120] federal level, my study is primarily in civil federal cases, fighting debt collectors and [01:35:20.120 --> 01:35:25.520] going after government agencies on the civil level, things like that. [01:35:25.520 --> 01:35:32.000] Okay, for one thing, I want to make a point that, and I've said this before on the air [01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:38.320] after we've had multiple interviews with Harmon Taylor, one of my favorite all time guests [01:35:38.320 --> 01:35:44.320] and a good friend of mine, a former attorney, retired attorney, he gave up, actually he [01:35:44.320 --> 01:35:49.600] gave up his bar card, it's more than retirement, he gave up his bar card when he found out [01:35:49.600 --> 01:35:57.840] what the legal reality is and this came down from, there was a case that he was involved [01:35:57.840 --> 01:36:05.840] in, he took it up to the 7th Circuit of Appeals, a federal case involving the Oklahoma City [01:36:05.840 --> 01:36:13.240] bombing where he represented some of the survivors, some of the victims from the Oklahoma City [01:36:13.240 --> 01:36:17.760] bombing, they wanted to depose Timothy McVeigh in a bunch of things like this, they had all [01:36:17.760 --> 01:36:21.920] kinds of proof that the government was involved in everything, well, at any rate, I'm not [01:36:21.920 --> 01:36:26.160] going to get into the details of the case but the bottom line is, this is a case, Graham [01:36:26.160 --> 01:36:31.920] V. Lappin, basically what the federal court system, and this is pretty clear in black [01:36:31.920 --> 01:36:36.880] and white, told him that the Constitution doesn't matter, see he was raising all these [01:36:36.880 --> 01:36:41.880] constitutional issues because number one, this never should have been a federal case [01:36:41.880 --> 01:36:46.520] anyway regarding Timothy McVeigh, this should have been a state murder case, how did this [01:36:46.520 --> 01:36:48.360] turn into a federal case? [01:36:48.360 --> 01:36:54.800] The feds didn't have jurisdiction over that building, just because the feds own property [01:36:54.800 --> 01:36:59.880] in a state or rent a building or something like that doesn't mean that they have federal [01:36:59.880 --> 01:37:10.880] jurisdiction involving cases, a piece of property has to be ceded, c-e-d-e-d, ceded over to [01:37:10.880 --> 01:37:17.280] the federal government and by the state, by the governor of a state in order for the feds [01:37:17.280 --> 01:37:24.640] to have jurisdiction, okay, judicial jurisdiction, typically these involve pieces of property [01:37:24.640 --> 01:37:32.600] like say a military base or a federal prison, things like this, rarely anything to do with [01:37:32.600 --> 01:37:38.920] like the postal service, okay, I personally went down to the state archives building here [01:37:38.920 --> 01:37:44.920] in Austin for the state of Texas and I have the list of all property in Texas that has [01:37:44.920 --> 01:37:51.000] been ceded to the United States government, okay, it's a pretty short list, so let's just [01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:56.240] get that straight right now, so one of Harman's issues was how did the feds get involved in [01:37:56.240 --> 01:38:01.080] this Timothy McVeigh case or anything prosecuting the Oklahoma City bombing at all, they did [01:38:01.080 --> 01:38:06.560] not have jurisdiction over that building, okay, they were either renting it or it was [01:38:06.560 --> 01:38:11.480] some kind of a lease or it was a property that had not been ceded, so that's one issue, [01:38:11.480 --> 01:38:16.960] constitutional issue, should have been a state murder trial, number two, how did they move [01:38:16.960 --> 01:38:24.200] the case to Colorado, what's up with that, there is no constitutional authority for the [01:38:24.200 --> 01:38:29.480] feds to change venue like that to another state that has nothing to do with anything [01:38:29.480 --> 01:38:33.120] that went on, well of course the reason was because everyone in Oklahoma City knew that [01:38:33.120 --> 01:38:37.280] there were multiple bombs that were going off before the truck bomb and that there wasn't [01:38:37.280 --> 01:38:43.800] even a truck bomb, so anyways, all these constitutional issues got raised and the court, federal court [01:38:43.800 --> 01:38:47.840] system basically came back and told them in a nutshell, none of that constitutional stuff [01:38:47.840 --> 01:38:55.360] matters because all law is by agreement, okay, every statute is by agreement, the only thing [01:38:55.360 --> 01:39:01.800] that matters is what the statute says and under, I think it was Title 18, Section 3, [01:39:01.800 --> 01:39:06.800] I think I have to go back and look, it says that the feds have jurisdiction wherever they [01:39:06.800 --> 01:39:10.200] have interest, wherever they have some kind of interest and they claim some interest, [01:39:10.200 --> 01:39:13.720] okay, well that's not what the constitution is, so basically there's no such thing as [01:39:13.720 --> 01:39:20.240] an unconstitutional law, it's all by agreement, so that totally changed Harmon's paradigm, [01:39:20.240 --> 01:39:23.840] so first things first, I want to get it out there, constitution doesn't matter anyway, [01:39:23.840 --> 01:39:31.160] okay, all law is by agreement, it's by commercial agreement, everything is by commercial agreement [01:39:31.160 --> 01:39:37.760] except for common law crimes, it doesn't matter whether you agree to the penal code or not, [01:39:37.760 --> 01:39:44.320] okay, you are subject to the penal code, period, it's not a matter of choice because if you [01:39:44.320 --> 01:39:50.480] say, I'm not agreeing to the penal code and you've just gone and committed some murder [01:39:50.480 --> 01:39:54.800] or some heinous crime, then what the state will do is say, oh, you don't agree to the [01:39:54.800 --> 01:40:01.120] penal code, you don't agree to the common law penal code of this state, then what the [01:40:01.120 --> 01:40:06.760] state will do is they'll treat you as an enemy combatant like that you have committed a military [01:40:06.760 --> 01:40:11.760] attack against one of the state's citizens and they'll put you in a military tribunal, [01:40:11.760 --> 01:40:16.040] okay, so it's to your advantage to agree to the penal code, basically you don't have a [01:40:16.040 --> 01:40:21.200] choice on that one, anything else it's by agreement only, so first things first, I want [01:40:21.200 --> 01:40:24.880] to get that out of the way, second thing, if we're even going to talk about the constitution [01:40:24.880 --> 01:40:33.760] at all, when I read over this section two, okay, section two of article three, the first [01:40:33.760 --> 01:40:42.400] thing that came to my mind is obviously there's no way that the founders could have possibly [01:40:42.400 --> 01:40:51.840] meant that in any and all possible conceivable cases where the state, where a state is a [01:40:51.840 --> 01:40:56.880] party that the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction, there is no way that they could [01:40:56.880 --> 01:41:04.240] have meant that, okay, that is insanity, all right, and so I'm thinking, well, somebody's [01:41:04.240 --> 01:41:11.320] taking this clause out of context, let's back up here, let's see what it says before and [01:41:11.320 --> 01:41:17.640] so, you know, just so folks will know where I'm coming from, my degree is in mathematics, [01:41:17.640 --> 01:41:25.400] my primary area of study is logic, Boolean logic, okay, and that is my primary area of [01:41:25.400 --> 01:41:30.120] study, proving abstract math theorems, all right, that's what I went to graduate school [01:41:30.120 --> 01:41:37.400] for for UT, and so I break things down according to Boolean logic, so I backed up and I was [01:41:37.400 --> 01:41:45.480] looking at clause one, okay, the preceding paragraph, I said, well, what does it say [01:41:45.480 --> 01:41:56.200] about where the state is, where the state is a party, okay, so I'm looking at this and [01:41:56.200 --> 01:42:00.680] hold on, let me read this, okay, clause one, we're not talking about ambassadors and other [01:42:00.680 --> 01:42:05.480] things like that, we're specifically looking at the situation where the state is a party, [01:42:05.480 --> 01:42:13.800] okay, well, the preceding paragraph here says, okay, two controversies between two or more [01:42:13.800 --> 01:42:22.040] states, see, clause one has to do with where does the federal judicial system have jurisdiction, [01:42:22.040 --> 01:42:29.560] judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity basically under these particular [01:42:29.560 --> 01:42:37.240] circumstances, the federal judicial system in general, okay, has authority, has jurisdiction [01:42:37.240 --> 01:42:42.840] over these types of cases, I'm going to jump to where the state is a case, a controversy [01:42:42.840 --> 01:42:49.320] between two or more states, you know, Texas sues New Mexico, something like that, okay, [01:42:49.320 --> 01:42:58.680] a case where between a state and citizens of another state, like say, citizens of Louisiana [01:42:58.680 --> 01:43:04.600] decide to sue the state of Texas for some reason, okay, that's a situation where the [01:43:04.600 --> 01:43:13.480] feds have jurisdiction, okay, a situation where, let's see, the state claiming lands [01:43:13.480 --> 01:43:19.800] under grants of different states and between a state and a foreign state, that's like say, [01:43:19.800 --> 01:43:26.440] Texas versus Mexico, something like that or between the state as a state and citizens [01:43:26.440 --> 01:43:34.200] or subjects of a foreign state, okay, so those are the situations that involve where the [01:43:34.200 --> 01:43:42.040] feds have jurisdiction, okay, concerning where the state is a party in general, now the subset [01:43:42.040 --> 01:43:49.240] of that, where does the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction, I'll get to that next, [01:43:49.240 --> 01:43:57.240] that's clause two, that is a subset of clause one, the situations listed in clause one. [01:43:57.240 --> 01:44:06.440] Oh, we'll be right back. [01:44:27.580 --> 01:44:32.960] They are different varieties of the same species. [01:44:32.960 --> 01:44:34.960] Hempusa.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand [01:44:34.960 --> 01:44:39.200] that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about. [01:44:39.200 --> 01:44:45.440] Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory, [01:44:45.440 --> 01:44:51.000] non-gmo and is loaded with nutrients. [01:44:51.000 --> 01:45:00.000] 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at MPUSA.org. [01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:08.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary. [01:45:08.000 --> 01:45:16.000] The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:20.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:20.000 --> 01:45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:35.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. [01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:44.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:53.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:53.000 --> 01:46:15.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:15.000 --> 01:46:16.000] Okay, folks, we are back. [01:46:16.000 --> 01:46:18.000] This is Rule of Law, Randy Kelton and Deborah Stevens. [01:46:18.000 --> 01:46:26.000] Okay, so I was getting to the point about what Clause 2 is in reference to. [01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:38.000] Because common sense tells us all that there is no way that the founders could have been so brain dead that they could have possibly meant, [01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:52.000] there is no way under the sun that they could have possibly meant that the U.S. Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in any and all possible conceivable cases under the sun where a state is a party. [01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:54.000] That is not possible. [01:46:54.000 --> 01:46:56.000] It cannot mean that. [01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:59.000] Common sense tells us that's not possible. [01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:02.000] So now we look, what does logic say? [01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:10.000] Okay, so when I'm reading this, it looks to me structurally that Clause 2 is a subset of Clause 1. [01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:20.000] Okay, what types of cases, let me back up again, what types of cases does the federal court system have jurisdiction over in general? [01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:22.000] Okay, in general. [01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:32.000] Okay, the federal court system where a state is a party, the federal court system has jurisdiction where there's two or more states involved. [01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:46.000] If there's a state of one party and citizens of another state between a state and other citizens of another state, [01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:55.000] or between a state and a foreign state like Texas versus Mexico, or between a state and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, [01:47:55.000 --> 01:48:13.000] those are the options you have to choose from, okay, not in situations where, you know, you've got citizens of the same state suing the state that they're in. [01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:16.000] If they're citizens in a different state, yes. [01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:21.000] Okay, these are the options to choose from regarding where do the feds have jurisdiction. [01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:32.000] Now there are ways that you could get a case into federal jurisdiction if there's a federal question, okay, if like say there's a citizen of a state suing that same state. [01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:46.000] You can go into the federal court system if there's a federal question, but for sure in these specific types of cases as listed in, quote, clause one, for sure the feds have jurisdiction. [01:48:46.000 --> 01:49:02.000] Now clause two says regarding where the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction, it says, well, in cases where there's ambassadors, ministers, consuls, [01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:08.000] and those where a state shall be a party, the U.S. Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. [01:49:08.000 --> 01:49:24.000] Now what that means, folks, is where the state is a party to a case which falls under, which falls in the list as listed out in clause one, okay. [01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:40.000] So if the state is a party of a case and it falls under the description of cases where the state is a party in clause one, in other words, it has to be that type, [01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:48.000] one of these types of cases as listed in clause one involving a state, then the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction. [01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:56.000] So if you want to know, if you've got a state as a party and you want to know does the U.S. Supreme Court have original jurisdiction or not, [01:49:56.000 --> 01:50:03.000] go look at clause one and see if the case can be classified as one of these types of cases as listed in clause one. [01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:05.000] That is obvious to me. [01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:08.000] In other words, clause two is a subset of clause one, okay. [01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:19.000] Now maybe the founders could have outlined it better and called clause two, they should have called it clause one B and called the first clause clause one A or, [01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:28.000] you know, something like that to somehow indicate an outline form that clause two is a subset of clause one. [01:50:28.000 --> 01:50:33.000] It seemed obvious to me, but this is not up for debate. [01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:47.000] I have already done research on this and there are multiple websites of legal scholars from Stanford, Yale and Harvard that agree with my position [01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:54.000] and that have case law to back it up and one of the cases that I just happened to find on Wikipedia of all places, [01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:00.000] which I am not impressed with Wikipedia because most of what Wikipedia is disinfo, [01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:11.000] especially when it comes to important things like they won't let you edit certain articles that have to do with 9-11 and stuff like that, [01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:20.000] but sometimes for like generic mainstream stuff Wikipedia is sort of, you can sort of, you know, take it with a grain of salt, [01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:27.000] but at any rate it just came up as one of the hits and I was like okay, just for yucks and grins, let's see what they say. [01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:33.000] And it says here, they've got a footnote, they've got it annotated. [01:51:33.000 --> 01:51:40.000] This is one of the annotations which backs up what I, my point is and what the scholars' points are, [01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:47.000] these other legal scholars is Cohen v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264. [01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:49.000] This case is almost 200 years old. [01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:59.000] Okay, I knew that this question had to be settled, okay, long, long ago, okay, because there is no way, [01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:07.000] this is ludicrous to think that the U.S. Supreme Court would have original jurisdiction over any and all possible cases where a state is a party. [01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:08.000] I don't think so. [01:52:08.000 --> 01:52:20.000] Okay, so the U.S. Supreme Court, just to clarify because apparently this question was raised 200 years ago, almost 200 years ago, 1821, [01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:27.000] Cohen v. Virginia, and of course I haven't had time to shepardize it because I couldn't anyway. [01:52:27.000 --> 01:52:32.000] I don't have a subscription to Westlaw or Lexis which is what's required to do shepardizing, [01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:36.000] but Randy confirmed on the break Cohen v. Virginia is still a good case law. [01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:47.000] All right, 1821, they say the Supreme Court said the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in cases where a state is a party [01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:58.000] refers to those cases in which according to the grant of power made in the preceding clause, jurisdiction might be exercised, okay, [01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:07.000] according, this is the key phrase here, according to the grant of the power made in the preceding clause. [01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:10.000] In other words, clause two is a subset of clause one. [01:53:10.000 --> 01:53:20.000] If you want to know what types of cases the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction when the state, when a state is a party, [01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:32.000] it has to be classified, it has to fall into the classification of one of the types of cases where the state is a party as listed in clause one. [01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:38.000] End of story, it's done. This is almost 200-year-old case law and it is still good, okay? [01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:49.000] Okay, making sense to me now. If I'm in a traffic case and it's the state against me, that doesn't go to federal jurisdiction. [01:53:49.000 --> 01:54:00.000] Not unless there's a federal question, which you have to, but you have to go through the appellate process within the state in order to get to the feds. [01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:13.000] But if I sue, if I file suit against a state officer, say I file suit against a judge for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, that stays in the state. [01:54:13.000 --> 01:54:24.000] But if I sue for a procedural due process violation, that would go to the feds. [01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:26.000] Well, that's different. [01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:31.000] Since I named the state, then that would go. [01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:43.000] Okay, that's according to statute. Now you're going to like whatever it is, Title 42, civil rights statutes. [01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:45.000] Okay, that's different. [01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:56.000] Now you're talking about statute where there's statutory standing to sue for civil rights violations or things like that or the Bevens or something like that. [01:54:56.000 --> 01:55:04.000] That's based on case law, but regarding Constitution. And say if you wanted, say you're in Texas, say you wanted to sue the state of Texas. [01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:09.000] That doesn't automatically go to the feds. It would go to the feds if there's a federal question. [01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:18.000] Now if you, being in Texas, wanted to sue the state of New Mexico, then that automatically goes to the U.S. Supreme Court. [01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:28.000] Okay, because it clearly says that the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction when there's cases involving a state and citizens of a different state. [01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:32.000] Okay, that's when the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction. [01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:41.000] Okay, so listen, folks, I want to make a side comment here, besides the fact of us not being constitutional experts and for good reason, [01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:52.000] because personally I don't think it is very fruitful or productive in light of Harmon Taylor's case, that every law, every statute is by commercial agreement anyway, except for the penal code. [01:55:52.000 --> 01:56:09.000] Okay, besides that, I would like to ask the listeners that if y'all have a question about, especially Constitution or like legal theory, to try to do a little bit of research on your own before calling us. [01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:13.000] Because in a way, this is sort of a rabbit trail, okay? [01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:32.000] I mean, I don't want to be too hard on Andrew, but I mean, I spent the last 20, 30 minutes looking this up, and this is a, the answer to this question was solved almost 200 years ago, and it only took me 20 minutes to figure it out. [01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:41.000] And so, I mean, listen, folks, part of what we are teaching here is we want to teach you how to do this on your own. [01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:46.000] Don't necessarily come to us to answer every single question you have. [01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:48.000] I mean, try to look it up. [01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:51.000] Do put a little effort to look things up on your own. [01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:56.000] If you get stumped in the research, then call us, and we'll discuss it. [01:56:56.000 --> 01:57:09.000] But, you know, anybody with just putting some sort of effort here could have found this, okay, because there is case law on this matter, and there have been legal documents, white papers written on this matter. [01:57:09.000 --> 01:57:13.000] This is a settled issue from a long time ago, all right? [01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:18.000] So anyways, it's good to know that that's the answer to the question. [01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:23.000] So, Randy, do you have any other comments on this? [01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:29.000] At the end of the day, Andrew still stumped this. [01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:37.000] Well, I mean, you know, like I said, he may, there's all kinds of things we could get stumped on. [01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:40.000] We're not going to have every answer to every question. [01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:42.000] That's okay. That's cool. [01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:56.000] I actually like the word crafting, taking the words apart this way. It's the engineer side, too, to figure out exactly what they meant. [01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:03.000] So I don't mind being stumped. The law is so huge, nobody knows it all, and I certainly don't. [01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:08.000] All right. Well, yeah, and there's other case law on this matter besides Cohen v. Virginia. [01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:15.000] Well, a well-settled issue. But thank you, Randy, and thank you listeners out there for supporting us. [01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:26.000] We really appreciate it. Get Randy's e-book, and please donate and get your name in the hat for the drawing for the AR-15, plus other prizes to be announced. [01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:35.000] Please go to logosradionetwork.com, and you will see all the information on the left, and there will be more information posted soon. [01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:44.000] So thank you very much, listeners. We surely appreciate you. So everyone, God bless and good night. [01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:50.000] We'll be back tomorrow night with Randy's four-hour Info Marathon. [01:58:50.000 --> 01:59:08.000] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:32.000] This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:49.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:49.000 --> 02:00:03.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.