[00:00.000 --> 00:07.760]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:07.760 --> 00:09.760]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:09.760 --> 00:23.360]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.360 --> 00:29.720]  Markets for Wednesday, the 11th of January, 2017 are currently treading with gold at $1,194.10
[00:29.720 --> 00:36.560]  an ounce, silver at $16.75 an ounce, Texas crude at $50.82 a barrel, and Bitcoin is down
[00:36.560 --> 00:44.760]  at $776 U.S. dollars.
[00:44.760 --> 00:49.880]  Today in history, the year 1964, the Surgeon General of the United States, at the time
[00:49.880 --> 00:55.160]  Dr. Luther Terry, published the landmark report, Smoking and Health, a report of the advisory
[00:55.160 --> 00:59.560]  committee to the Surgeon General of the United States, stating that smoking may be hazardous
[00:59.560 --> 01:01.000]  to one's health.
[01:01.000 --> 01:06.160]  Today in history.
[01:06.160 --> 01:07.160]  And recent news.
[01:07.160 --> 01:11.640]  President Barack Obama gave his farewell address to the nation from Chicago last night, where
[01:11.640 --> 01:16.520]  he highlighted some of his claims to success during his presidency, like, in his words,
[01:16.520 --> 01:20.920]  reversing a great recession, rebooting the U.S. auto industry, the longest stretch of
[01:20.920 --> 01:25.880]  job creation, opening commercial relations with Cuba, shutting down Iran's nuclear weapons
[01:25.880 --> 01:30.960]  program, taking out the mastermind of 9-11, marriage equality, and securing the right
[01:30.960 --> 01:34.640]  of health insurance for another 20 million citizens via Obamacare.
[01:34.640 --> 01:38.600]  He also discussed some of the issues still needing governmental attention, like growing
[01:38.600 --> 01:43.280]  inequality, demographic changes, and the increasing use of terrorism.
[01:43.280 --> 01:52.640]  The full speech can be found on YouTube, along with the transcript online.
[01:52.640 --> 01:56.400]  President-elect Donald J. Trump held his first news conference in Manhattan today when asked
[01:56.400 --> 02:00.840]  about the allegations of Russia hacking DNC email last fall.
[02:00.840 --> 02:05.360]  Trump responded by saying, quote, As far as hacking, I think it was Russia, but I think
[02:05.360 --> 02:08.600]  we also got hacked by every other country and other people.
[02:08.600 --> 02:13.760]  I have to say this also, the Democratic National Committee was totally open to be hacked.
[02:13.760 --> 02:15.160]  They did a very poor job.
[02:15.160 --> 02:18.800]  They could have had hacking defense, which we had.
[02:18.800 --> 02:23.320]  Trump then went on to have a verbal confrontation with a heckling CNN news reporter who he would
[02:23.320 --> 02:28.040]  refuse to call on and went as far as to say that, quote, Don't be rude.
[02:28.040 --> 02:30.520]  No, I'm not going to give you a question.
[02:30.520 --> 02:54.000]  I'm not going to give you a question you are fake news.
[03:00.520 --> 03:28.880]  I'm not going to give you a question you are fake news.
[03:28.880 --> 03:53.440]  I'm not going to give you a question you are fake news.
[03:53.440 --> 03:59.920]  Hey, howdy, howdy, this is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevenson's Rue La Radio on this Thursday,
[03:59.920 --> 04:09.480]  the 12th day of January, 2017, and I'm afraid that Deborah has a problem with her face.
[04:09.480 --> 04:18.400]  Yeah, I was telling Randy, I have a problem with my face tonight and that is it hurts
[04:18.400 --> 04:25.520]  really bad because I couldn't stop laughing all day yesterday and all night long and all
[04:25.520 --> 04:30.880]  day long today because of, and I'm sure everybody has seen this and talked about it enough,
[04:30.880 --> 04:39.520]  but I just have to say my face hurts from laughing so hard from Trump calling out CNN
[04:39.520 --> 04:45.000]  telling them they are fake news on live TV.
[04:45.000 --> 04:56.480]  I'm sorry, no, you don't get a question, no, you're being rude, stop, shut up, be quiet,
[04:56.480 --> 05:00.280]  don't be rude, she's trying to ask a question, no, you don't get a question, no, you're fake
[05:00.280 --> 05:01.560]  news.
[05:01.560 --> 05:06.480]  And by the way, there's a bunch of other fake news right up here in the front row too.
[05:06.480 --> 05:11.920]  I mean, we are witnessing history in the making.
[05:11.920 --> 05:17.760]  John Rappaport was saying today and Alex Jones, we cannot overstate what happened yesterday.
[05:17.760 --> 05:20.440]  I mean, I think some of us are still in shock.
[05:20.440 --> 05:26.120]  I mean, it's just unbelievable, no president has ever done anything like this.
[05:26.120 --> 05:31.800]  No leader has ever done anything like this, calling them out, all fake news.
[05:31.800 --> 05:38.160]  I mean, this guy, I'm looking at his Twitter account right now and he's tweeted like, I
[05:38.160 --> 05:44.760]  don't know, at least 10 times since yesterday, he says, I win an election easily, a great
[05:44.760 --> 05:53.040]  quote movement is verified and crooked opponents try to belittle our victory with fake news.
[05:53.040 --> 05:58.520]  That's one of his tweets and then he says, we had a great news conference at Trump Tower
[05:58.520 --> 05:59.520]  today.
[05:59.520 --> 06:05.040]  A couple of fake news organizations were there but the people truly get what's going on.
[06:05.040 --> 06:10.200]  And then he says, he says today, CNN is in total meltdown with their fake news because
[06:10.200 --> 06:14.880]  their ratings are tanking since election, their credibility will soon be gone.
[06:14.880 --> 06:15.880]  They're done.
[06:15.880 --> 06:16.880]  They are done.
[06:16.880 --> 06:22.600]  I mean, their stocks plummeted yesterday, Time Warner stocks plummeted, he started going
[06:22.600 --> 06:28.040]  after Big Pharma, he's going after the vaccine industry, he's going after the drug industry
[06:28.040 --> 06:33.360]  in general because they rip off the public with all the high prices and all the dangers
[06:33.360 --> 06:42.440]  and the fake drug studies, that's next, fake drug studies so they can push these dangerous
[06:42.440 --> 06:43.440]  drugs on the market.
[06:43.440 --> 06:50.640]  I mean, I'm astounded, I mean, Randy, this is incredible, we've never seen anything
[06:50.640 --> 06:51.800]  like this.
[06:51.800 --> 07:00.320]  I have never, I've been around a while, we've seen a president stand up and look so much
[07:00.320 --> 07:03.520]  like a leader.
[07:03.520 --> 07:10.240]  He didn't care what any of the political factions were, he didn't care what anybody thought,
[07:10.240 --> 07:17.200]  he gave the distinct impression that he was going to turn this country around and he didn't
[07:17.200 --> 07:19.560]  care what anybody thought about it.
[07:19.560 --> 07:28.320]  Now I don't know if you disagree with that or not but we absolutely do have a leader.
[07:28.320 --> 07:35.760]  We may not always agree with where he's going but we can definitely believe that he is going
[07:35.760 --> 07:37.720]  to lead this country.
[07:37.720 --> 07:42.520]  Yeah, he's not taking marching orders from anybody, at least not yet.
[07:42.520 --> 07:47.600]  They may get to him, they may threaten his family, you know.
[07:47.600 --> 07:53.360]  Well, he's going to get into the political fights and find out that he has to work with
[07:53.360 --> 07:55.120]  them but he kind of already knows that.
[07:55.120 --> 08:01.080]  He already knows that because, I mean, just even looking at some of his appointees, you
[08:01.080 --> 08:05.200]  know, a lot of us are kind of like raising a hairy eyebrow, like, huh?
[08:05.200 --> 08:13.880]  But the thing is he can't totally appoint, you know, complete renegades or else they
[08:13.880 --> 08:15.200]  won't get confirmed.
[08:15.200 --> 08:20.480]  All right, these are not necessarily, these are not just personal employees, I mean, these
[08:20.480 --> 08:27.620]  are appointees by the president and they have to be confirmed by the senate and if he doesn't
[08:27.620 --> 08:33.560]  compromise a little bit, he's not going to be able to get in who he wants and so he's
[08:33.560 --> 08:38.000]  got to do the best he can with what he's got to work with and I don't know, I think he's
[08:38.000 --> 08:39.000]  doing pretty good so far.
[08:39.000 --> 08:45.880]  I don't agree with all of his positions but I'll tell you what, we have never seen a situation
[08:45.880 --> 08:51.960]  like this where you've got a president coming in who's completely bucking the establishment
[08:51.960 --> 08:59.360]  all around, big pharma, bucking big pharma, bucking the mainstream media, the lame stream,
[08:59.360 --> 09:04.000]  the fake stream media, I mean, it's just amazing.
[09:04.000 --> 09:08.400]  The one thing I keep saying is, you know, we've been saying for a long time it didn't
[09:08.400 --> 09:12.520]  matter if you voted for the Republicans or the Democrats because they all essentially
[09:12.520 --> 09:19.320]  have their snouts in the same trough at the end of the day, well, Trump may have his snout
[09:19.320 --> 09:26.720]  in a trough but it's not either one of theirs and from my perspective, that is a very good
[09:26.720 --> 09:33.360]  thing to have and I saw Trump setting his posture, telling every country in the world
[09:33.360 --> 09:40.440]  if you're going to deal with us, we are no longer going to be an easy deal and what he
[09:40.440 --> 09:49.480]  said about the wall between us and Mexico and Mexico paying for it, he began to make
[09:49.480 --> 09:50.480]  more sense.
[09:50.480 --> 09:58.720]  He said, yeah, we're going to pay for it initially but we'll get it back, he will get it through
[09:58.720 --> 10:06.480]  import taxes and levies and other ways, he let Mexico know they're going to pay for it.
[10:06.480 --> 10:13.440]  Well, one thing that came out on some analysis on some talk shows yesterday about this wall
[10:13.440 --> 10:20.200]  thing and them paying for it, you know, there are international trade agreements all over
[10:20.200 --> 10:24.280]  the place and that's why our economy is tanking.
[10:24.280 --> 10:31.440]  Now, as president, he cannot modify these trade agreements, Congress has to modify them
[10:31.440 --> 10:41.360]  but as president, he can cancel them and how many billions of dollars, maybe even trillions
[10:41.360 --> 10:49.120]  of trade deficit just between us and Mexico, okay, well, maybe it wouldn't be like that
[10:49.120 --> 10:52.520]  if that trade agreement was canceled now, would it?
[10:52.520 --> 10:58.520]  I mean, there's not much that he has to do, I mean, he can just do a few things like,
[10:58.520 --> 11:03.000]  well, let's just do this and let's see how you like that.
[11:03.000 --> 11:13.040]  And if you're a U.S. company and you're thinking of outsourcing, he sure threw a cog in that.
[11:13.040 --> 11:18.720]  I really liked what he said about it, he said, if you're in Michigan and you want to move
[11:18.720 --> 11:25.120]  your plant to Tennessee, well, just go right ahead, I don't care but if you move your plant
[11:25.120 --> 11:34.360]  out of country, I will see to it that there are import tariffs that make that not profitable.
[11:34.360 --> 11:40.920]  You're not going to drop jobs in the United States and outsourcing to someone else with
[11:40.920 --> 11:50.000]  no penalty and whether he can actually get all that done or not, he is sure thrown down
[11:50.000 --> 11:55.680]  the gauntlet and let them know if you're going to make this calculation, it's going to be
[11:55.680 --> 11:59.520]  a hard calculation, I am not going to make this easy for you.
[11:59.520 --> 12:02.720]  Well, there's all kinds of things that he can do.
[12:02.720 --> 12:10.640]  I saw an op-ed piece that was saying, remember that carrier deal where he somehow was able
[12:10.640 --> 12:17.120]  to work some deal for a carrier to at least keep like, what was it, I forgot how many
[12:17.120 --> 12:18.120]  jobs?
[12:18.120 --> 12:19.120]  Thousand jobs.
[12:19.120 --> 12:25.040]  Thousand or twelve hundred or something like that in the US and somebody wrote an op-ed
[12:25.040 --> 12:29.800]  piece and said, yeah, this is probably how it went.
[12:29.800 --> 12:39.960]  Carrier's parent company is a defense contractor and so you can just see it like a mafia mobster
[12:39.960 --> 12:41.240]  boss.
[12:41.240 --> 12:48.320]  All he has to do is go to a carrier and their parent company and say, nice defense contract
[12:48.320 --> 12:57.600]  you got there, sure would hate to see anything happen to it now.
[12:57.600 --> 13:00.600]  You hear what I'm saying, Randy?
[13:00.600 --> 13:04.560]  He can do that because he's not in bed with any of these guys.
[13:04.560 --> 13:10.880]  Right, right, he doesn't need the money, they can't pay him off, they can't buy him off.
[13:10.880 --> 13:11.880]  Right.
[13:11.880 --> 13:13.280]  He's not in anybody's pocket.
[13:13.280 --> 13:18.480]  Yeah, he's not in anybody's, he don't have his snout in anybody's trough and that's the
[13:18.480 --> 13:23.120]  big deal and I liked what he did with his companies and the fact that he had somebody
[13:23.120 --> 13:29.800]  else who understood business, explained what they did with the companies and why they did
[13:29.800 --> 13:37.640]  it the way they did, I thought that was really well done and primarily the fact that he didn't
[13:37.640 --> 13:38.640]  have to.
[13:38.640 --> 13:45.400]  He's short-circuiting a lot of criticism, certainly he's going to get criticism but
[13:45.400 --> 13:50.240]  it's going to be nitpicking criticism of not nature.
[13:50.240 --> 13:53.200]  So I was real pleased with the conference, it was much better than I expected.
[13:53.200 --> 13:58.240]  Yeah, and he's not going to do everything that we want and I already know that at least
[13:58.240 --> 14:05.920]  currently his stance on like individual privacy and liberty and stuff like that is really
[14:05.920 --> 14:09.880]  not what I want to see at all.
[14:09.880 --> 14:16.400]  He's made statements that we got to give up our privacy, we got to give up this and that
[14:16.400 --> 14:18.440]  because of our safety.
[14:18.440 --> 14:22.840]  As of yet, I don't see him doing away with the TSA and stuff like that.
[14:22.840 --> 14:29.960]  I think he's been criticized because he's been a proponent of the stop and frisk policy
[14:29.960 --> 14:34.720]  in New York and stuff like that but let's give him a chance, he may come around.
[14:34.720 --> 14:41.800]  Now that he's seeing what these so-called intelligence agencies are doing to him in
[14:41.800 --> 14:51.720]  light of all this fake leaked documents, it's just total fake, total fake.
[14:51.720 --> 14:57.640]  He may start to get a clue and realize maybe it's not such a good idea for all these intelligence
[14:57.640 --> 15:03.960]  agencies to be collecting all this data on everybody because what if something was real
[15:03.960 --> 15:10.200]  and they just start using it against you, we'll see, we'll see what he does.
[15:10.200 --> 15:17.160]  One thing's for sure, it's time to break out the popcorn because this guy's not even
[15:17.160 --> 15:23.200]  in office yet and I'm telling you, it's like a riot every day of laughter around here for
[15:23.200 --> 15:24.200]  me and Jerry.
[15:24.200 --> 15:30.120]  It's just like every day, it's like, okay, what did he do now, what's he going to do
[15:30.120 --> 15:31.120]  now?
[15:31.120 --> 15:36.600]  But yesterday was historic, I mean that was absolutely historic, he completely slammed
[15:36.600 --> 15:37.600]  CNN.
[15:37.600 --> 15:47.720]  Oh that was, I was surprised at the reporter, the guy was not smart, he should have shut
[15:47.720 --> 15:49.440]  up and sat down.
[15:49.440 --> 15:54.600]  They have hubris, it's hubris Randy, they're so arrogant off the charts, they're in outer
[15:54.600 --> 15:59.560]  orbit because they've always had their way, they've always gotten to do whatever they
[15:59.560 --> 16:05.960]  want and run the show and bully everybody and call all the shots and so they don't have
[16:05.960 --> 16:14.600]  the skill set that is necessary to deal with situations when you're not getting your way.
[16:14.600 --> 16:19.000]  See, we have that skill set because we've almost never gotten our way, we're constantly
[16:19.000 --> 16:24.640]  having to deal with corruption in the courts and getting slammed at trial and not getting
[16:24.640 --> 16:29.720]  the inner evidence and not getting discovery and getting ruled against and all this kind
[16:29.720 --> 16:34.400]  of thing, having to appeal and appeal and appeal, you know, and Ron Paul loses, I mean
[16:34.400 --> 16:39.520]  it's like we're constantly having to deal with getting beat up and bruised and not getting
[16:39.520 --> 16:40.520]  our way.
[16:40.520 --> 16:46.360]  These people don't have that skill set, yeah, they fly off the handle, they act like little
[16:46.360 --> 16:48.320]  toddlers tantrumming, it's hilarious.
[16:48.320 --> 16:53.720]  That's what I thought, this guy was just having a fit and on national television, if I owned
[16:53.720 --> 16:55.560]  him, in the end, he would be his.
[16:55.560 --> 16:56.560]  Fired.
[16:56.560 --> 16:57.560]  You're fired.
[16:57.560 --> 16:58.560]  We'll be right back.
[16:58.560 --> 16:59.560]  Dang, Cookie.
[16:59.560 --> 17:00.560]  Cookie?
[17:00.560 --> 17:01.560]  Me love cookies.
[17:01.560 --> 17:02.560]  Oh, hi Cookie Munchers.
[17:02.560 --> 17:03.560]  No, these are yucky cookies.
[17:03.560 --> 17:04.560]  Cookies?
[17:04.560 --> 17:05.560]  Yucky?
[17:05.560 --> 17:06.560]  No, no bad cookies.
[17:06.560 --> 17:07.560]  You can't even eat these cookies, these are cyber cookies.
[17:07.560 --> 17:08.560]  No, can't eat?
[17:08.560 --> 17:09.560]  No, they're cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[17:09.560 --> 17:10.560]  Me have apple.
[17:10.560 --> 17:11.560]  Really?
[17:11.560 --> 17:12.560]  Oh, that's an actual apple.
[17:12.560 --> 17:13.560]  Hmm, yummy apple.
[17:13.560 --> 17:14.560]  Munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers,
[17:14.560 --> 17:31.020]  munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers,
[17:31.020 --> 17:36.980]  munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers, munchers.
[17:36.980 --> 17:42.500]  and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand side, bookmark the link and I can
[17:42.500 --> 17:47.140]  go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies.
[17:47.140 --> 17:48.140]  New cookies?
[17:48.140 --> 17:49.140]  For me?
[17:49.140 --> 17:51.140]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[17:51.140 --> 17:55.980]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this
[17:55.980 --> 17:56.980]  radio network too.
[17:56.980 --> 17:57.980]  C is for cookie.
[17:57.980 --> 18:00.620]  C is for classified.
[18:00.620 --> 18:05.380]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.380 --> 18:09.340]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:09.340 --> 18:13.740]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.740 --> 18:14.740]  can win too.
[18:14.740 --> 18:19.660]  You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.660 --> 18:25.420]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.420 --> 18:29.980]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[18:29.980 --> 18:34.180]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.180 --> 18:38.980]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.980 --> 18:41.460]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.460 --> 18:46.980]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.980 --> 18:49.940]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.940 --> 18:58.980]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[18:58.980 --> 18:59.980]  collectors now.
[18:59.980 --> 19:06.980]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:06.980 --> 19:26.460]  Okay, folks, we are back.
[19:26.460 --> 19:30.260]  This is the Rule of Law, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens.
[19:30.260 --> 19:34.060]  It is Thursday, January 12, 2017.
[19:34.060 --> 19:42.140]  We're watching History in the Making and, I mean, it's just so funny, Randy.
[19:42.140 --> 19:51.100]  The Presidential Inaugural Ball, they're calling it the Deplora Ball because Hillary Clinton
[19:51.100 --> 19:53.980]  called us all the basket of deplorables.
[19:53.980 --> 19:57.140]  I mean, that is historical, too.
[19:57.140 --> 20:05.580]  Never in history has a candidate for president insulted the American people.
[20:05.580 --> 20:13.020]  I mean, they insult each other, they'll insult the opposing candidates, but they don't insult
[20:13.020 --> 20:19.740]  the people that support the opposing candidates.
[20:19.740 --> 20:26.580]  That's the dumbest move ever because if you're insulting the people who support your opposition,
[20:26.580 --> 20:29.540]  well, then they're never going to want to support you.
[20:29.540 --> 20:37.580]  You want to win over the support of the people that are supporting your opposing candidate.
[20:37.580 --> 20:44.740]  You want to show the people who support your opposers why you are better than the opposing
[20:44.740 --> 20:51.260]  candidate and why you should change your mind and support me and vote for me instead, okay?
[20:51.260 --> 20:56.540]  But instead she calls everybody the basket of deplorables?
[20:56.540 --> 21:02.100]  I mean, this is... How dumb is that?
[21:02.100 --> 21:08.580]  For someone of Clinton's experience, I was kind of astounded at that, but that went to
[21:08.580 --> 21:09.580]  their arrogance.
[21:09.580 --> 21:10.580]  Hubris again.
[21:10.580 --> 21:11.580]  Yeah.
[21:11.580 --> 21:16.740]  Well, because they thought they had the election rigged, and that's the other thing that we've
[21:16.740 --> 21:17.740]  been talking about.
[21:17.740 --> 21:20.060]  It's like they did everything they could.
[21:20.060 --> 21:25.820]  They rigged as many voting machines and as many central tabulation machines as they could.
[21:25.820 --> 21:31.300]  They bussed illegal voters all around, voting multiple times, illegal aliens that aren't
[21:31.300 --> 21:32.300]  supposed to be voting.
[21:32.300 --> 21:37.820]  I mean, they did everything that was voter fraud, which is when people are voting that
[21:37.820 --> 21:42.420]  they're not supposed to be voting, that don't have the right to vote, because they're not
[21:42.420 --> 21:45.820]  citizens, when people are voting multiple times.
[21:45.820 --> 21:52.100]  That is voter fraud, and then of course there was voting fraud, which is rigging the machines,
[21:52.100 --> 21:55.140]  rigging the elections, flipping the votes, all this kind of thing.
[21:55.140 --> 21:57.500]  They did everything they could.
[21:57.500 --> 22:04.220]  They threw all the media, all the lies, all the fake news, everything they did.
[22:04.220 --> 22:06.260]  They gave it their best shot.
[22:06.260 --> 22:14.020]  They threw everything they had at the situation, and they still couldn't get it, because it
[22:14.020 --> 22:17.100]  was too big to steal.
[22:17.100 --> 22:26.700]  We estimate everywhere it was anything from 65 to even 90% people voting for Trump, and
[22:26.700 --> 22:27.700]  it's just too big to steal.
[22:27.700 --> 22:28.700]  It's hilarious.
[22:28.700 --> 22:30.780]  So anyways, I don't know.
[22:30.780 --> 22:36.220]  It's just so funny, because now they're calling the inauguration ball the deplore ball.
[22:36.220 --> 22:39.380]  But we need to get to callers.
[22:39.380 --> 22:42.620]  We could bask in the glow all night.
[22:42.620 --> 22:46.580]  But before we get to callers, I have an announcement to make.
[22:46.580 --> 22:53.420]  We have just launched our 2017 fundraiser, and right at the beginning of the year is
[22:53.420 --> 22:59.700]  typically the time when it's the most tight around here, because we have beginning of
[22:59.700 --> 23:03.980]  the year expenses with all kinds of taxing situations.
[23:03.980 --> 23:10.300]  And so we're launching our 2017 fundraiser, and I haven't posted on the website yet the
[23:10.300 --> 23:17.300]  prizes, but I did get confirmation from Michael Cargill of Central Texas Gunworks.
[23:17.300 --> 23:25.380]  He is sponsoring the fundraiser again, and this time, are you ready for this?
[23:25.380 --> 23:27.180]  There's going to be at least one prize.
[23:27.180 --> 23:32.860]  Actually, I just got an email from another listener today that wants to donate another
[23:32.860 --> 23:41.420]  prize that's going to be another firearm, but the grand prize is going to be an AR-15
[23:41.420 --> 23:42.420]  rifle.
[23:42.420 --> 23:43.420]  All right.
[23:43.420 --> 23:47.500]  Now, I don't know what make and model it is yet.
[23:47.500 --> 23:51.660]  Michael's going to get back to me with the details, but we're doing the same thing again
[23:51.660 --> 23:55.140]  for every $25 donation.
[23:55.140 --> 23:58.340]  You get your name in the hat one time.
[23:58.340 --> 24:02.140]  So if you donate $100, you get four chances to win.
[24:02.140 --> 24:05.380]  Now, this is not a raffle, okay?
[24:05.380 --> 24:07.620]  Raffles are a different kind of an animal.
[24:07.620 --> 24:08.900]  You sell tickets.
[24:08.900 --> 24:09.900]  There's numbers.
[24:09.900 --> 24:15.140]  Actually, technically, a raffle can only be for a specific amount of cash.
[24:15.140 --> 24:22.140]  It has to be a cash prize that the amount is stated in advance and is highly regulated
[24:22.140 --> 24:23.780]  by the federal government.
[24:23.780 --> 24:27.260]  You have to be a nonprofit organization or school or these kinds of things.
[24:27.260 --> 24:32.380]  So people kind of toss around that term raffle loosely, but this is not a raffle.
[24:32.380 --> 24:38.660]  It is a drawing, and of course, you have to be eligible to obtain a firearm in your state.
[24:38.660 --> 24:40.580]  You have to be at least 18.
[24:40.580 --> 24:42.900]  In most states, you can't be a felon.
[24:42.900 --> 24:48.700]  Now some states, you may not be allowed to have an AR-15, but don't worry because there'll
[24:48.700 --> 24:50.060]  be other prizes.
[24:50.060 --> 25:00.700]  So folks, if you would please start getting your name into the hat for this AR-15 in this
[25:00.700 --> 25:08.540]  year's fundraiser and help us get through this bottleneck here during the month of January,
[25:08.540 --> 25:13.980]  which is the crunch month around this network here.
[25:13.980 --> 25:20.380]  And also, there's another place you can donate that doesn't have any restrictions.
[25:20.380 --> 25:21.380]  Oh my gosh.
[25:21.380 --> 25:28.100]  Yeah, Randy's Beer Fund, and you will receive, for every donation, massive kudos.
[25:28.100 --> 25:29.100]  Massive kudos.
[25:29.100 --> 25:33.540]  Maybe he'll send you the bottle cap of the beer that he drinks from your donation.
[25:33.540 --> 25:38.420]  Now I've only got three of those, so I won't have very many.
[25:38.420 --> 25:42.700]  Okay, so Randy, what do you say we start taking calls now?
[25:42.700 --> 25:47.540]  All righty, we're going to go to Jeff in Mississippi.
[25:47.540 --> 25:48.540]  Hello Mr. Jeff.
[25:48.540 --> 25:51.540]  Hey Randy, thanks for having me on.
[25:51.540 --> 25:52.540]  Good.
[25:52.540 --> 25:55.540]  What do you have for us today?
[25:55.540 --> 25:58.380]  I have gone off and done something.
[25:58.380 --> 26:03.140]  I've gone off and complicated something, and I need to simplify it.
[26:03.140 --> 26:05.020]  And it is very confusing.
[26:05.020 --> 26:14.100]  I've written a brief for the listeners, I've filed a Title 42 against a university for
[26:14.100 --> 26:18.420]  denying me admission twice without ever having a hearing.
[26:18.420 --> 26:24.420]  And so I filed the Title 42, it got dismissed.
[26:24.420 --> 26:34.460]  In the meantime, the attorneys myself have gotten into numerous arguments, through documentation
[26:34.460 --> 26:40.660]  that is, accusations, all kinds of stuff, and the judge has even jumped in there.
[26:40.660 --> 26:47.940]  Well under my argument section in my brief, I now have 41 arguments, which I think is
[26:47.940 --> 26:51.700]  way too many, even I'm confused.
[26:51.700 --> 26:55.140]  So I'd like to simplify that down.
[26:55.140 --> 27:05.980]  If you look at the order that the judge did, he made seven false statements in his order,
[27:05.980 --> 27:11.940]  and then he dismissed two of my motions, a motion for reconsideration, three of my motions,
[27:11.940 --> 27:18.660]  a motion for sanction, a motion for reconsideration, a motion for findings and facts and conclusions
[27:18.660 --> 27:19.660]  of law.
[27:19.660 --> 27:22.180]  He dismissed those without even addressing them.
[27:22.180 --> 27:27.340]  He just dismissed them, he didn't even say if they were frivolous or meritless, he just
[27:27.340 --> 27:32.500]  said that there's no reason to even look into them, that they're just going to be dismissed.
[27:32.500 --> 27:36.260]  So that's about ten arguments, you've got three motions dismissed without addressing
[27:36.260 --> 27:40.100]  them, and then you've got seven false statements in his order.
[27:40.100 --> 27:42.220]  Should I just stick to that?
[27:42.220 --> 27:49.020]  Well I don't know, I don't know what the other arguments are.
[27:49.020 --> 27:52.780]  Now the other arguments are between me and the attorney, and the attorney made a bunch
[27:52.780 --> 27:59.260]  of false statements, misdirection, he misstated case law, but the judge himself never said
[27:59.260 --> 28:03.580]  that in his order, he didn't side for the attorney.
[28:03.580 --> 28:12.700]  Well if he ruled against you, he sided for the attorney.
[28:12.700 --> 28:20.500]  And if he didn't give you the facts that he relied upon and the law he applied to those
[28:20.500 --> 28:28.460]  facts, then that's exactly what he's required to give you in order for there to be a judgment.
[28:28.460 --> 28:34.580]  So you haven't had a judgment in all your issues.
[28:34.580 --> 28:36.060]  No.
[28:36.060 --> 28:42.820]  So that's denying you your right to petition the court for redress of grievance.
[28:42.820 --> 28:47.260]  That's mispleasance in office on part of the judge.
[28:47.260 --> 28:50.660]  Now would that be an argument or an issue in the brief?
[28:50.660 --> 28:51.660]  Absolutely.
[28:51.660 --> 28:54.860]  How would you word that?
[28:54.860 --> 29:00.780]  Well he denied you your right to petition because he did not address the issues you
[29:00.780 --> 29:05.860]  raised in your motions, he just denied them out of hand.
[29:05.860 --> 29:06.860]  Okay.
[29:06.860 --> 29:13.780]  And you asked for findings of fact and he refused to give it.
[29:13.780 --> 29:18.660]  So that's procedural due process by denial.
[29:18.660 --> 29:21.420]  Okay.
[29:21.420 --> 29:26.540]  So I can take 40 arguments and kind of whittle them down to 5 or 10.
[29:26.540 --> 29:31.500]  Or you can take 40 arguments and address each one of them.
[29:31.500 --> 29:36.260]  Well, they have a 30 page minimum or maximum.
[29:36.260 --> 29:37.260]  Oh, okay.
[29:37.260 --> 29:38.260]  Yeah, that's right.
[29:38.260 --> 29:39.260]  I remember that.
[29:39.260 --> 29:44.380]  So you might want to whittle it down just to stay within the limit.
[29:44.380 --> 29:45.380]  Hang on.
[29:45.380 --> 29:46.380]  We'll pick this up on the other side.
[29:46.380 --> 29:52.260]  This is Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Root of Law Radio, I'll call you number 512-646-1984.
[29:52.260 --> 29:56.660]  We'll be taking your calls all night.
[29:56.660 --> 30:04.900]  And remember our fundraiser is on, perfect.
[30:04.900 --> 30:09.620]  Americans spend big bucks to filter impurities from dirty tap water, but researchers have
[30:09.620 --> 30:12.420]  found a cheap and easy way to leave your water sparkling.
[30:12.420 --> 30:17.100]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you how to do it after this.
[30:17.100 --> 30:18.820]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.820 --> 30:22.420]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.420 --> 30:27.420]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.420 --> 30:32.460]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.460 --> 30:35.220]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.220 --> 30:40.820]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[30:40.820 --> 30:42.540]  Yahoo and Bing.
[30:42.540 --> 30:44.540]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:44.540 --> 30:50.500]  If your tap water is looking sketchy, but you can't afford an expensive water filtration
[30:50.500 --> 30:55.940]  system, here's a trick to improve your drinking water and your health for pennies.
[30:55.940 --> 31:00.340]  Researchers at Johns Hopkins say sunlight and a twist of lime juice reduces harmful
[31:00.340 --> 31:05.500]  bacteria, such as E. coli, and it works nearly as well as other methods like boiling.
[31:05.500 --> 31:10.260]  Just add two tablespoons of lime juice or half a lime for every two liter bottle of
[31:10.260 --> 31:11.260]  water.
[31:11.260 --> 31:14.340]  Then leave it in the sun for six hours and you're good to go.
[31:14.340 --> 31:19.260]  One caution, while viruses were also dramatically reduced with this technique, they weren't
[31:19.260 --> 31:22.980]  entirely eliminated, so when in doubt, boil them out.
[31:22.980 --> 31:29.540]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:29.540 --> 31:36.100]  Did you know there are three million edible food plants on earth and none have the nutritional
[31:36.100 --> 31:37.780]  value of the hemp plant?
[31:37.780 --> 31:40.340]  Hempusa.org offers you hemp protein powder.
[31:40.340 --> 31:46.220]  It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-gmo, and is 100% gluten free.
[31:46.220 --> 31:51.420]  The protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein, and feeds the body the
[31:51.420 --> 31:52.780]  nutrients it needs.
[31:52.780 --> 32:03.300]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at hempusa.org.
[32:03.300 --> 32:06.100]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[32:06.100 --> 32:09.940]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[32:09.940 --> 32:13.860]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.860 --> 32:17.060]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:17.060 --> 32:21.100]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:21.100 --> 32:24.940]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.940 --> 32:26.380]  our rights through due process.
[32:26.380 --> 32:30.300]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:30.300 --> 32:34.100]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:34.100 --> 32:36.180]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.180 --> 32:40.500]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:40.500 --> 32:41.500]  ordering your copy today.
[32:41.500 --> 32:45.140]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:45.140 --> 32:49.580]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:49.580 --> 32:51.900]  documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.900 --> 32:55.140]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.140 --> 33:14.620]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:14.620 --> 33:39.220]  Yeah, Mr. officer, you're taking me like that Won't you follow the law of the land?
[33:39.220 --> 33:43.220]  I know that's bad This love is just to take us to service
[33:43.220 --> 33:45.220]  Okay, we are back.
[33:45.220 --> 33:49.220]  Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, and we're talking to Jeff from Mississippi.
[33:49.220 --> 33:51.220]  Go ahead, Jeff.
[33:51.220 --> 33:58.220]  You've got more arguments than you can get in the appeal, so you might want to take...
[33:58.220 --> 34:04.220]  I want 30 page maximum, and I could easily be going on about 70 or 80 pages.
[34:04.220 --> 34:08.220]  And each of the arguments are fantastic.
[34:08.220 --> 34:19.220]  The judge came in when he dismissed my case, and when I was denied admission to the university,
[34:19.220 --> 34:22.220]  I was not given a reason why.
[34:22.220 --> 34:25.220]  And in fact, I never got a denial letter.
[34:25.220 --> 34:31.220]  They just denied my payment for the semester, and that was it.
[34:31.220 --> 34:33.220]  I just never could enter class.
[34:33.220 --> 34:38.220]  So the attorney came back and said I was never denied admission.
[34:38.220 --> 34:41.220]  It's almost like I was making it all up.
[34:41.220 --> 34:44.220]  And the judge actually cited for this guy.
[34:44.220 --> 34:47.220]  The judge said, yeah, he was never denied admission.
[34:47.220 --> 34:52.220]  So it's silly stuff like that that I want to go chasing, but like I said, I came up with...
[34:52.220 --> 34:56.220]  You might ask for a waiver and tell the court of appeals,
[34:56.220 --> 35:03.220]  you have more claims in appeal than you have pages available.
[35:03.220 --> 35:04.220]  Okay.
[35:04.220 --> 35:09.220]  And ask them for a waiver to allow you to file more pages.
[35:09.220 --> 35:13.220]  So for you, that would definitely be worth arguing.
[35:13.220 --> 35:15.220]  Absolutely.
[35:15.220 --> 35:17.220]  Okay.
[35:17.220 --> 35:20.220]  Because, yeah, I mean, their claim is I was never denied.
[35:20.220 --> 35:27.220]  Oh, and then they claimed that I was never even a student.
[35:27.220 --> 35:32.220]  I got thrown out twice the second time I was a current student,
[35:32.220 --> 35:38.220]  and they denied my entry into for the next semester.
[35:38.220 --> 35:45.220]  So I'm not sure if that's called being expelled.
[35:45.220 --> 35:48.220]  But they're saying you weren't a student at all.
[35:48.220 --> 35:53.220]  Yeah, like I'm just some guy walking across the street that nobody ever even knew.
[35:53.220 --> 35:58.220]  But I actually went and applied, and they were supposed to have a hearing,
[35:58.220 --> 36:00.220]  and they denied me admission.
[36:00.220 --> 36:03.220]  And then I'd gone to school for a year.
[36:03.220 --> 36:06.220]  And then when I signed up for the next semester after taking finals,
[36:06.220 --> 36:08.220]  then I was denied admission again.
[36:08.220 --> 36:14.220]  But I'm not sure if that's called expulsion.
[36:14.220 --> 36:22.220]  Julie, expulsion has a method to it.
[36:22.220 --> 36:24.220]  I'm not sure what we'd call it.
[36:24.220 --> 36:25.220]  I'm not sure.
[36:25.220 --> 36:28.220]  I don't have enough details of exactly what happened.
[36:28.220 --> 36:32.220]  But at the end of the day, you were denied access.
[36:32.220 --> 36:34.220]  Yeah, and there is no procedure.
[36:34.220 --> 36:35.220]  There's no letters.
[36:35.220 --> 36:36.220]  There's no...
[36:36.220 --> 36:37.220]  I never went to a hearing.
[36:37.220 --> 36:40.220]  I just simply showed up, and they denied my payment.
[36:40.220 --> 36:44.220]  And then the dean wrote me a letter and said, well,
[36:44.220 --> 36:49.220]  we're not sure we need to make a decision on if you can be admitted.
[36:49.220 --> 36:53.220]  And so the judge is using that and saying, well, he was never denied admission.
[36:53.220 --> 36:58.220]  So it's all these little weird, silly stuff that amounts up to about 40 different arguments.
[36:58.220 --> 37:02.220]  And you're saying go ahead and list them all and make an 80-page brief?
[37:02.220 --> 37:08.220]  No, I'm saying petition the court for leave to file extra pages
[37:08.220 --> 37:12.220]  as you have more arguments than you have pages.
[37:12.220 --> 37:13.220]  Okay.
[37:13.220 --> 37:16.220]  But definitely go ahead and list them and argue them?
[37:16.220 --> 37:21.220]  Yeah, I would do one with the 30 pages, within the 30-page limit.
[37:21.220 --> 37:28.220]  And then add a second, the rest of the arguments in a supplement
[37:28.220 --> 37:33.220]  and ask them to accept that because you have some arguments
[37:33.220 --> 37:36.220]  that you have more arguments than there are pages.
[37:36.220 --> 37:38.220]  And it's called a supplement.
[37:38.220 --> 37:43.220]  And that's for the waiver.
[37:43.220 --> 37:44.220]  Okay.
[37:44.220 --> 37:47.220]  So waiver to add a supplement.
[37:47.220 --> 37:53.220]  Well, we would ask for a waiver of the rule to add more pages
[37:53.220 --> 37:56.220]  because of the complex nature of the suit
[37:56.220 --> 38:03.220]  and you have more claims to adjudicate than you have pages.
[38:03.220 --> 38:07.220]  Okay. Do I turn the brief in first and then turn the waiver in second?
[38:07.220 --> 38:11.220]  Turn them both in together and then ask them for the waiver
[38:11.220 --> 38:18.220]  and ask them to accept the supplement and then they can look at it
[38:18.220 --> 38:24.220]  and decide whether they think it's worth including or not.
[38:24.220 --> 38:26.220]  Got it. Okay, very good.
[38:26.220 --> 38:32.220]  Okay, my second deal is I'm really getting hammered by the Court of Appeals.
[38:32.220 --> 38:39.220]  I sent in my brief and they are now coming back and saying
[38:39.220 --> 38:43.220]  that I've done the record of excerpts and stuff all wrong.
[38:43.220 --> 38:46.220]  And I honestly don't know how to do a record of excerpts
[38:46.220 --> 38:50.220]  and every time I call the clerk they wind up hanging up on me.
[38:50.220 --> 38:55.220]  So they're writing me nasty letters saying that I'm not putting the table of contents
[38:55.220 --> 39:01.220]  correctly and this and that and they threaten to throw my case out if I don't get it fixed.
[39:01.220 --> 39:09.220]  I don't know how to answer that because there are rules on how this is to be done.
[39:09.220 --> 39:11.220]  Have you met the rules?
[39:11.220 --> 39:13.220]  Uh-huh.
[39:13.220 --> 39:14.220]  That was a question.
[39:14.220 --> 39:17.220]  Obviously I'm not because there's little things here and there.
[39:17.220 --> 39:20.220]  You left the page numbers off or you forgot.
[39:20.220 --> 39:24.220]  I put a table of contents in the brief but when I sent in the record of excerpts,
[39:24.220 --> 39:29.220]  I guess I didn't add a table of contents on that which was kind of confusing.
[39:29.220 --> 39:31.220]  I didn't know any better.
[39:31.220 --> 39:34.220]  So you do have to follow the rules down to the T.
[39:34.220 --> 39:35.220]  Oh, yeah.
[39:35.220 --> 39:37.220]  They get real picky about that.
[39:37.220 --> 39:38.220]  Okay.
[39:38.220 --> 39:42.220]  And so there really is a chance to lose my appeal based on...
[39:42.220 --> 39:49.220]  Well, not if you respond to their issues.
[39:49.220 --> 39:50.220]  Okay.
[39:50.220 --> 39:51.220]  You keep responding to it.
[39:51.220 --> 39:52.220]  Let them gripe.
[39:52.220 --> 39:55.220]  Whatever they gripe about, you respond to that.
[39:55.220 --> 39:57.220]  You know, they can't just toss it.
[39:57.220 --> 39:58.220]  They have to respond.
[39:58.220 --> 40:00.220]  And if you respond and you still do it wrong,
[40:00.220 --> 40:03.220]  they're not going to tell you what's wrong with it, you're a pro se.
[40:03.220 --> 40:07.220]  So they have to give you a certain amount of leeway by statutes.
[40:07.220 --> 40:09.220]  Okay.
[40:09.220 --> 40:10.220]  Okay.
[40:10.220 --> 40:12.220]  The clerks have to help you.
[40:12.220 --> 40:18.220]  If the clerks are hanging up on you, make sure you keep everything recorded.
[40:18.220 --> 40:19.220]  Okay.
[40:19.220 --> 40:22.220]  But you might want to go back and hammer the clerk.
[40:22.220 --> 40:26.220]  They might need their attitude adjusted a little bit.
[40:26.220 --> 40:27.220]  Yeah.
[40:27.220 --> 40:29.220]  She just hung up on me today.
[40:29.220 --> 40:33.220]  She did a neat little trick that I'd never heard of before.
[40:33.220 --> 40:37.220]  She answers the phone and said, my name is so-and-so.
[40:37.220 --> 40:40.220]  And then I said my name and case number.
[40:40.220 --> 40:44.220]  And then she kind of took a deep breath like she realized who it was,
[40:44.220 --> 40:47.220]  you know, kind of like I'm Hannibal Lecter or something.
[40:47.220 --> 40:52.220]  And he goes, oh, let me transfer you to my desk.
[40:52.220 --> 40:56.220]  And then from there, I just went off into outer space of the voicemail.
[40:56.220 --> 41:00.220]  That should get a complaint to the judge.
[41:00.220 --> 41:03.220]  Oh.
[41:03.220 --> 41:06.220]  I thought it was brilliant, honestly.
[41:06.220 --> 41:08.220]  Whoa.
[41:08.220 --> 41:14.220]  But let's see how brilliant it is when you file a motion with the court
[41:14.220 --> 41:18.220]  to order the clerks to stop hanging up on you.
[41:18.220 --> 41:21.220]  Okay.
[41:21.220 --> 41:24.220]  That won't make them happy.
[41:24.220 --> 41:25.220]  Okay.
[41:25.220 --> 41:26.220]  I'll let you get on.
[41:26.220 --> 41:30.220]  I just wanted to know if I wanted to argue the other stuff.
[41:30.220 --> 41:34.220]  The attorney totally misstated case law.
[41:34.220 --> 41:41.220]  So did the judge, completely misstated case law and the standard of review.
[41:41.220 --> 41:43.220]  And, of course, I argued that.
[41:43.220 --> 41:47.220]  Then after a year of being out of the university,
[41:47.220 --> 41:53.220]  now they're finally coming back and saying that my shot records were incomplete.
[41:53.220 --> 41:56.220]  Well, nobody ever told me about my shot records a year ago,
[41:56.220 --> 41:59.220]  but now they're just pulling stuff out of a hat.
[41:59.220 --> 42:00.220]  Yeah.
[42:00.220 --> 42:02.220]  And so I'm arguing that.
[42:02.220 --> 42:04.220]  And the judge has actually sided with them.
[42:04.220 --> 42:06.220]  They said, oh, yeah, he shot records.
[42:06.220 --> 42:07.220]  That was it.
[42:07.220 --> 42:08.220]  That was it.
[42:08.220 --> 42:09.220]  So I'm arguing that too.
[42:09.220 --> 42:13.220]  But I'm coming up with about 40 different arguments.
[42:13.220 --> 42:20.220]  So just ask them to accept, include them in a separate document, an attachment,
[42:20.220 --> 42:29.220]  and ask the court to waive the 30-page limit and accept these arguments.
[42:29.220 --> 42:35.220]  And they'll look at the arguments and decide if they think they warrant inclusion.
[42:35.220 --> 42:36.220]  I got it.
[42:36.220 --> 42:37.220]  Okay.
[42:37.220 --> 42:41.220]  So type them up and send them along with the original brief
[42:41.220 --> 42:45.220]  and ask them to accept these additional arguments.
[42:45.220 --> 42:47.220]  Exactly.
[42:47.220 --> 42:49.220]  Okay. Got it.
[42:49.220 --> 42:50.220]  Okay.
[42:50.220 --> 42:53.220]  And when I type up the additional arguments,
[42:53.220 --> 42:59.220]  do I still want to use the original caption in the court of the U.S. Court of Appeals?
[42:59.220 --> 43:00.220]  Absolutely. Absolutely.
[43:00.220 --> 43:01.220]  Court of Appeals.
[43:01.220 --> 43:02.220]  Yeah.
[43:02.220 --> 43:03.220]  Okay.
[43:03.220 --> 43:09.220]  And then from there on, it'll say supplemental arguments or additional arguments and then...
[43:09.220 --> 43:11.220]  Yeah, additional arguments.
[43:11.220 --> 43:14.220]  So it's part of a separate document.
[43:14.220 --> 43:16.220]  They need to pay attention to it or not.
[43:16.220 --> 43:19.220]  So that'll be separate.
[43:19.220 --> 43:20.220]  Yeah.
[43:20.220 --> 43:21.220]  Okay. I sure appreciate it.
[43:21.220 --> 43:22.220]  I'll let you go.
[43:22.220 --> 43:23.220]  And thank you very much.
[43:23.220 --> 43:24.220]  All righty.
[43:24.220 --> 43:25.220]  Okay.
[43:25.220 --> 43:26.220]  We are about to go to break.
[43:26.220 --> 43:30.220]  And when we come back, we're going to go to Don in New Mexico.
[43:30.220 --> 43:34.220]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Root of Law Radio.
[43:34.220 --> 43:38.220]  I call it number 512-646-1984.
[43:38.220 --> 43:44.220]  We're starting a new donation drive.
[43:44.220 --> 43:47.220]  Make sure you don't forget Randy's beer bottle.
[43:47.220 --> 43:49.220]  And we have to keep our privacy.
[43:49.220 --> 44:02.220]  We'll be right back.
[44:02.220 --> 44:06.220]  Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com.
[44:06.220 --> 44:10.220]  And I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street,
[44:10.220 --> 44:14.220]  Sweet D here in Austin, Texas, buying Brave New Books and Chase Bank
[44:14.220 --> 44:18.220]  to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:18.220 --> 44:22.220]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.220 --> 44:24.220]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products,
[44:24.220 --> 44:30.220]  including our Australian emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[44:30.220 --> 44:37.220]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[44:37.220 --> 44:43.220]  That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.220 --> 44:47.220]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[44:47.220 --> 45:01.220]  naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.220 --> 45:04.220]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.220 --> 45:07.220]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[45:07.220 --> 45:15.220]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.220 --> 45:19.220]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.220 --> 45:23.220]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.220 --> 45:28.220]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.220 --> 45:34.220]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.220 --> 45:39.220]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.220 --> 45:43.220]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.220 --> 45:49.220]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.220 --> 46:01.220]  pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:01.220 --> 46:20.220]  If you did not have a problem, a wedding on foot for one.
[46:20.220 --> 46:26.220]  If you could not wait any battle, would you purposefully die?
[46:26.220 --> 46:32.220]  Would you stand down and be a soldier, a warrior of love, scuffling the keys of peace?
[46:32.220 --> 46:37.220]  All it taking is a misunderstanding, somebody calls the police.
[46:37.220 --> 46:59.220]  Why don't the sparks fly?
[46:59.220 --> 47:07.220]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to Don in New Mexico. Hello, Don.
[47:07.220 --> 47:10.220]  What do you have for us today?
[47:10.220 --> 47:12.220]  Happy New Year, Randy.
[47:12.220 --> 47:16.220]  Humbug, humbug.
[47:16.220 --> 47:19.220]  I got to be happy. I made another year.
[47:19.220 --> 47:21.220]  Well, there you go. It should be. That's right.
[47:21.220 --> 47:30.220]  I never did hear the continuation of the story with the grand jury that happened right before Christmas.
[47:30.220 --> 47:35.220]  You were going to be hearing from the prosecuting attorney.
[47:35.220 --> 47:40.220]  Oh, I did. And I really liked this prosecutor.
[47:40.220 --> 47:49.220]  I was just at a place today picking up some welding equipment, and Greg's family owns this place.
[47:49.220 --> 47:58.220]  And his brother was there, and I had great fun with his brother at Greg's expense, at the district attorney's expense.
[47:58.220 --> 48:06.220]  It seems that I took the complaints down, and Greg gave them to the grand jury.
[48:06.220 --> 48:12.220]  And the grand jury decided not to consider them.
[48:12.220 --> 48:14.220]  Oh, wow.
[48:14.220 --> 48:19.220]  I said, is that a fact, Jack?
[48:19.220 --> 48:31.220]  Well, the way I read 20.09, it says the grand jury shall investigate into all crimes subject to indictment.
[48:31.220 --> 48:44.220]  It doesn't say may, matter, can, if it wants to, and that's 20.09, and then 20.10 through 18 tell the grand jury how they will handle witnesses and evidence.
[48:44.220 --> 49:00.220]  20.19 says that after all the evidence has been secured and considered by the grand jury, the grand jury shall vote to indict Otrinoviel.
[49:00.220 --> 49:04.220]  It does not say may, matter, can, if it wants to.
[49:04.220 --> 49:09.220]  So that brought up an interesting question.
[49:09.220 --> 49:30.220]  How could 12 people, ordinary people of reasonable prudence, all come to this same conclusion that shall does not mean must, but means may, matter, can, if it wants to?
[49:30.220 --> 49:32.220]  That is a conundrum.
[49:32.220 --> 49:47.220]  And the only way I can imagine reasonably that that happened is that they relied on, that they acted in good faith reliance on competent authority.
[49:47.220 --> 49:53.220]  Somebody told them.
[49:53.220 --> 49:56.220]  That saga continues, I take it.
[49:56.220 --> 50:00.220]  And I wonder who would have told them?
[50:00.220 --> 50:05.220]  The bailiff maybe?
[50:05.220 --> 50:08.220]  Oh, could it be the prosecutor?
[50:08.220 --> 50:13.220]  Now if the bailiff told them, that would be one thing.
[50:13.220 --> 50:16.220]  He would just be telling his opinion.
[50:16.220 --> 50:37.220]  But if the prosecutor told them, he would be acting in accordance with his duty under the legislature. The legislature actually directs the prosecutor to provide legal advice to the police, lower courts, and grand jury.
[50:37.220 --> 50:45.220]  So the prosecutor, if he told them, he would be giving them legal advice.
[50:45.220 --> 50:56.220]  And how much immunity does a prosecutor have when he's giving legal advice?
[50:56.220 --> 50:58.220]  Zero.
[50:58.220 --> 51:08.220]  So, I called Greg, and I said, well, Greg, I talked to your ADA, and he said the grand jury decided not to hear my complaints.
[51:08.220 --> 51:10.220]  And he said, well, yeah, they did.
[51:10.220 --> 51:23.220]  So, when I come down there, should I bring a criminal complaint against each current grand jury member to you?
[51:23.220 --> 51:28.220]  Or should I take it to the new grand jury?
[51:28.220 --> 51:35.220]  Oh, Mr. Kelton, you always give me such a headache.
[51:35.220 --> 51:39.220]  I'm having so much fun at Greg's expense.
[51:39.220 --> 51:44.220]  I told Greg, as far as I'm concerned, I don't care what you do.
[51:44.220 --> 51:49.220]  He's going to try to bring the grand jury back because they're already out of term.
[51:49.220 --> 51:53.220]  I didn't talk to him until they were out of term.
[51:53.220 --> 52:03.220]  And he says, well, he believes he can bring them back and have them go ahead and vote on this.
[52:03.220 --> 52:05.220]  But they're not sure.
[52:05.220 --> 52:09.220]  They're checking the law to see if they can.
[52:09.220 --> 52:19.220]  If they cannot, then I'm going to go in there and file on every one of those grand jury members.
[52:19.220 --> 52:24.220]  Well, I can't wait to see how that turns out.
[52:24.220 --> 52:34.220]  Well, see, I was hoping they would have returned an indictment for you, but this is even more fun, I guess.
[52:34.220 --> 52:39.220]  Oops.
[52:39.220 --> 52:51.220]  I think I might have lost Randy.
[52:51.220 --> 53:04.220]  Yeah, a story for everyone to hear, yeah, like how we're not going to give in to the fear.
[53:04.220 --> 53:08.220]  Yeah, a story.
[53:08.220 --> 53:23.220]  Boy, boy, boy, boy, boy.
[53:23.220 --> 53:45.220]  I will be with this faith and wisdom, I will aid my concerns.
[53:45.220 --> 53:56.220]  I will guard these walls and fences, I will come to take this place.
[53:56.220 --> 54:16.220]  Take a peek in every night to see if others enter, kiss all the parasites from around here.
[54:16.220 --> 54:18.220]  That's what you're doing, now we have the house you see.
[54:18.220 --> 54:29.220]  I will help you find my purpose, I won't allow the wicked.
[54:29.220 --> 54:40.220]  To guard and feed me sleep and sin truth, I will lie so long within.
[54:40.220 --> 54:50.220]  There are those in this world who would harm us, they will not hurt me.
[54:50.220 --> 55:02.220]  Cause when I will be found my father's house, I will aid the children's faith.
[55:02.220 --> 55:12.220]  Boy, boy, boy, boy, boy.
[55:12.220 --> 55:22.220]  I will be with this faith and wisdom, I will aid my concerns.
[55:22.220 --> 55:34.220]  Yeah, I will help you find my father's house, till death becomes clear.
[55:34.220 --> 55:46.220]  Daddy asked them to take control, I know that's why it's for me.
[55:46.220 --> 55:56.220]  All invested will be in good faith, and in good time.
[55:56.220 --> 56:04.220]  I will protect this right now, will not let it fall to petty crime.
[56:04.220 --> 56:07.220]  Okay, Don, this is Randy Kelton, I'm back.
[56:07.220 --> 56:12.220]  Seems my internet went out and I had to come back in on a cell phone.
[56:12.220 --> 56:16.220]  I'm not sure what happened here.
[56:16.220 --> 56:17.220]  Okay, where were we?
[56:17.220 --> 56:19.220]  Good, it was a good story.
[56:19.220 --> 56:24.220]  So I'm glad to hear that it's still continuing.
[56:24.220 --> 56:27.220]  Continuing saga.
[56:27.220 --> 56:28.220]  The continuing saga.
[56:28.220 --> 56:36.220]  Did you get the email that I sent you today with my criminal complaint?
[56:36.220 --> 56:40.220]  I may have, I forgot it, I haven't seen it yet.
[56:40.220 --> 56:46.220]  Okay, I've been working on the ebook.
[56:46.220 --> 56:47.220]  Okay.
[56:47.220 --> 56:51.220]  Go ahead, what was the complaint that you filed this time?
[56:51.220 --> 57:00.220]  Well, on December 30th I sent out a complaint to the U.S. Attorney here in New Mexico against the SAC of the FBI
[57:00.220 --> 57:12.220]  for not sending the complaint that I filed with the FBI on that IRS agent to the Attorney General.
[57:12.220 --> 57:17.220]  And instead they sent it to the IRS and he got buried.
[57:17.220 --> 57:26.220]  I know that because the IRS agent showed up right after Christmas with a firm letter saying he was going to just seize my house
[57:26.220 --> 57:31.220]  because he can just do that with his own signature apparently.
[57:31.220 --> 57:38.220]  So I went ahead and filed a criminal complaint against the FBI SAC and I sent another complaint to the grand jury
[57:38.220 --> 57:43.220]  but I addressed it to the District Court here in New Mexico.
[57:43.220 --> 57:49.220]  And I got that back in the mail from the District Court telling me that I've got to send that to the U.S. Attorney
[57:49.220 --> 57:54.220]  and they gave me the address so I'm getting ready to ship that out to the U.S. Attorney.
[57:54.220 --> 58:02.220]  I wanted you to look it over before I sent it originally but I didn't have time because it was holidays
[58:02.220 --> 58:07.220]  and I thought if you had time I'm going to ship it out tomorrow, maybe Monday at the latest.
[58:07.220 --> 58:10.220]  If you have a chance to look it over I'd appreciate it.
[58:10.220 --> 58:11.220]  Yes, some input.
[58:11.220 --> 58:21.220]  Okay, if I can get my Internet back up I will try to have a look at it and contact me tomorrow.
[58:21.220 --> 58:24.220]  This is great fun.
[58:24.220 --> 58:26.220]  Now you're going after the SAC.
[58:26.220 --> 58:32.220]  For those of you who don't really know what's going on here, 20th U.S.C. 535.
[58:32.220 --> 58:36.220]  Don brought that to your meeting. It looks like a Christmas present.
[58:36.220 --> 58:42.220]  It says if a government official has knowledge that another official has violated law
[58:42.220 --> 58:50.220]  related to their office that they must report it to the Attorney General.
[58:50.220 --> 58:54.220]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[58:54.220 --> 58:58.220]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.220 --> 59:02.220]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text
[59:02.220 --> 59:07.220]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.220 --> 59:09.220]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.220 --> 59:13.220]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate
[59:13.220 --> 59:18.220]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.220 --> 59:22.220]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way
[59:22.220 --> 59:28.220]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.220 --> 59:33.220]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.220 --> 59:43.220]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.220 --> 59:50.220]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.220 --> 01:00:00.220]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.220 --> 01:00:06.220]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown
[01:00:06.220 --> 01:00:13.220]  providing your jelly bulletins for the commodities market. Today in history, news updates
[01:00:13.220 --> 01:00:22.220]  and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:22.220 --> 01:00:30.220]  Markets for Wednesday, the 11th of January, 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,194.10 an ounce,
[01:00:30.220 --> 01:00:39.220]  silver $16.75 an ounce, Texas crude $50.82 a barrel, and Bitcoin is down at $776.
[01:00:39.220 --> 01:00:50.220]  Today in history, the year 1964, the Surgeon General of the United States at the time,
[01:00:50.220 --> 01:00:55.220]  Dr. Luther Terry published the landmark report, Smoking and Health, a report of the advisory committee
[01:00:55.220 --> 01:01:00.220]  to the Surgeon General of the United States stating that smoking may be hazardous to one's health.
[01:01:00.220 --> 01:01:05.220]  Today in history.
[01:01:05.220 --> 01:01:11.220]  In recent news, President Barack Obama gave his farewell address to the nation from Chicago last night
[01:01:11.220 --> 01:01:16.220]  where he highlighted some of his claims to success during his presidency, like, in his words,
[01:01:16.220 --> 01:01:22.220]  reversing a great recession, rebooting the US auto industry, the longest stretch of job creation,
[01:01:22.220 --> 01:01:28.220]  opening commercial relations with Cuba, shutting down Iran's nuclear weapons program, taking out the mastermind
[01:01:28.220 --> 01:01:34.220]  of 9-11, marriage equality, and securing the right of health insurance for another 20 million citizens via Obamacare.
[01:01:34.220 --> 01:01:39.220]  He also discussed some of the issues still needing governmental attention, like growing inequality,
[01:01:39.220 --> 01:01:43.220]  demographic changes, and the increasing use of terrorism.
[01:01:43.220 --> 01:01:52.220]  The full speech can be found on YouTube along with the transcript online.
[01:01:52.220 --> 01:01:57.220]  President-elect Donald J. Trump held his first news conference in Manhattan today when asked about the allegations
[01:01:57.220 --> 01:02:02.220]  of Russia hacking DNC emails last fall, Trump responded by saying, quote,
[01:02:02.220 --> 01:02:08.220]  As far as hacking, I think it was Russia, but I think we also got hacked by every other country and other people.
[01:02:08.220 --> 01:02:13.220]  I have to say this also, the Democratic National Committee was totally open to be hacked.
[01:02:13.220 --> 01:02:18.220]  They did a very poor job. They could have had hacking defense, which we had.
[01:02:18.220 --> 01:02:24.220]  Trump then went on to have a verbal confrontation with a heckling CNN news reporter who he would refuse to call on
[01:02:24.220 --> 01:02:30.220]  and went as far as to say that, quote, Don't be rude. No, I'm not going to give you a question.
[01:02:30.220 --> 01:02:37.220]  I'm not going to give you a question. You are fake news.
[01:02:37.220 --> 01:02:41.220]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently conferring some contributors.
[01:02:41.220 --> 01:02:49.220]  If you would like to write articles or read them, feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257.
[01:02:49.220 --> 01:03:08.220]  This was Rick Rodney with your Lowdown for January 11th, 2017.
[01:03:19.220 --> 01:03:44.220]  I'm not going to give you a question.
[01:03:44.220 --> 01:04:12.220]  OK, we are back.
[01:04:12.220 --> 01:04:17.220]  Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:04:17.220 --> 01:04:25.220]  And we're having a little technical issue at the moment that we don't want to put in an archive,
[01:04:25.220 --> 01:04:27.220]  so we're going to try to work through this.
[01:04:27.220 --> 01:04:30.220]  OK, Don, you there?
[01:04:30.220 --> 01:04:32.220]  I'm still here.
[01:04:32.220 --> 01:04:33.220]  OK.
[01:04:33.220 --> 01:04:35.220]  If you want, I can call you back.
[01:04:35.220 --> 01:04:39.220]  I was explaining.
[01:04:39.220 --> 01:04:41.220]  Go ahead, Don.
[01:04:41.220 --> 01:04:43.220]  Sorry, I was talking over you.
[01:04:43.220 --> 01:04:45.220]  Go ahead.
[01:04:45.220 --> 01:04:50.220]  I was explaining that Don is the one that brought this statute to us.
[01:04:50.220 --> 01:04:54.220]  I had never seen it, and it was like a Christmas present.
[01:04:54.220 --> 01:05:01.220]  So when a federal official, and this isn't any official,
[01:05:01.220 --> 01:05:05.220]  and it appears anybody working for the federal government,
[01:05:05.220 --> 01:05:15.220]  it's kind of like an open-door whistleblower statute, a required call.
[01:05:15.220 --> 01:05:21.220]  So if you have knowledge that a federal official has violated the law,
[01:05:21.220 --> 01:05:27.220]  you're required to give notice to the Attorney General in D.C.,
[01:05:27.220 --> 01:05:32.220]  and that would allow you to bypass everybody local.
[01:05:32.220 --> 01:05:37.220]  And since the law requires you to, you'd have plausible deniability.
[01:05:37.220 --> 01:05:39.220]  So it's a great law.
[01:05:39.220 --> 01:05:47.220]  So Don gave a complaint to a local FBI agent against the IRS.
[01:05:47.220 --> 01:05:49.220]  Instead of sending it to the Attorney General,
[01:05:49.220 --> 01:05:53.220]  he sent it to the people that Don was complaining against.
[01:05:53.220 --> 01:05:56.220]  What is with that?
[01:05:56.220 --> 01:06:04.220]  So now he's complained against the special agent in charge.
[01:06:04.220 --> 01:06:06.220]  Did you file that?
[01:06:06.220 --> 01:06:09.220]  Okay, this complaint, where did you send it, Don?
[01:06:09.220 --> 01:06:12.220]  I sent it to the U.S. Attorney here in New Mexico.
[01:06:12.220 --> 01:06:21.220]  They got it on January 3rd, according to the post office, and I haven't heard a word.
[01:06:21.220 --> 01:06:30.220]  That should be interesting if you are the U.S. Attorney and you get this complaint.
[01:06:30.220 --> 01:06:34.220]  I wonder how sharp this guy is.
[01:06:34.220 --> 01:06:41.220]  He should recognize that this is a setup,
[01:06:41.220 --> 01:06:46.220]  that the guy knew what was supposed to be done, and it was.
[01:06:46.220 --> 01:06:49.220]  Now, he's a U.S. Attorney.
[01:06:49.220 --> 01:06:55.220]  He probably thinks he's being exempt from this statute.
[01:06:55.220 --> 01:06:58.220]  We'll see how that works.
[01:06:58.220 --> 01:07:01.220]  He may actually be, but we don't care.
[01:07:01.220 --> 01:07:02.220]  Right.
[01:07:02.220 --> 01:07:04.220]  Because the point of this is, you know,
[01:07:04.220 --> 01:07:09.220]  we've been telling people that when a new president takes office,
[01:07:09.220 --> 01:07:14.220]  then every U.S. Attorney in the country has to turn in their resignation.
[01:07:14.220 --> 01:07:18.220]  So while this U.S. Attorney is considering Don's complaint,
[01:07:18.220 --> 01:07:22.220]  he's also making up his resignation.
[01:07:22.220 --> 01:07:28.220]  And he's hoping that it won't get accepted.
[01:07:28.220 --> 01:07:34.220]  So if we come back with criminal complaints against this U.S. Attorney,
[01:07:34.220 --> 01:07:37.220]  now we've got politics.
[01:07:37.220 --> 01:07:47.220]  Well, how much time do you think I should give the U.S. Attorney to respond
[01:07:47.220 --> 01:07:51.220]  or because I have no way of knowing what's going on if he doesn't?
[01:07:51.220 --> 01:07:56.220]  Yeah, I would give him a week, no more,
[01:07:56.220 --> 01:08:01.220]  and then contact the U.S. Attorney and see if, I'm sorry,
[01:08:01.220 --> 01:08:07.220]  contact the Attorney General and see if the U.S. Attorney is giving him notice.
[01:08:07.220 --> 01:08:11.220]  Well, I've contacted, I wrote a letter to the Attorney General back in December
[01:08:11.220 --> 01:08:16.220]  regarding one of my criminal complaints, and I haven't heard a word from that either,
[01:08:16.220 --> 01:08:21.220]  not even a response saying they got my letter.
[01:08:21.220 --> 01:08:30.220]  Well, you can assume if you don't get a response that they didn't get the complaint.
[01:08:30.220 --> 01:08:31.220]  Okay.
[01:08:31.220 --> 01:08:34.220]  Just presume it.
[01:08:34.220 --> 01:08:39.220]  You know, the presumption is had they got it, they would have contacted you.
[01:08:39.220 --> 01:08:43.220]  So you have reason to believe that they never got it.
[01:08:43.220 --> 01:08:47.220]  Well, there's going to be a new Attorney General here in about 10 days,
[01:08:47.220 --> 01:08:50.220]  well, a little bit less, and...
[01:08:50.220 --> 01:08:53.220]  Oh, this is going to be great.
[01:08:53.220 --> 01:08:59.220]  So then you call the, you know, once you have the complaint against the U.S. Attorney,
[01:08:59.220 --> 01:09:06.220]  now you call down there and start making notes.
[01:09:06.220 --> 01:09:07.220]  Okay.
[01:09:07.220 --> 01:09:09.220]  You get all the phones in the building made up.
[01:09:09.220 --> 01:09:20.220]  A letter to the Grand Jury Foreman, and I don't think I've seen a copy of any that you've written up.
[01:09:20.220 --> 01:09:25.220]  And so it might have been a little bit more, I don't know,
[01:09:25.220 --> 01:09:30.220]  might have put in more stuff than I should have, other than here's a criminal complaint.
[01:09:30.220 --> 01:09:35.220]  What do you normally write in your letters to the Grand Jury Foreman?
[01:09:35.220 --> 01:09:42.220]  Well, I assume that the Grand Jury Foreman is an eighth grader
[01:09:42.220 --> 01:09:49.220]  who doesn't know anything about my situation or law.
[01:09:49.220 --> 01:09:55.220]  And I have to give him enough facts about the situation
[01:09:55.220 --> 01:09:59.220]  and enough law as it applies to those facts so that
[01:09:59.220 --> 01:10:05.220]  a reasonable person of ordinary credence could come to the conclusion that a law has been violated
[01:10:05.220 --> 01:10:09.220]  and this person violated himself.
[01:10:09.220 --> 01:10:16.220]  I don't think that being concerned about giving him too much information is such a concern.
[01:10:16.220 --> 01:10:18.220]  It doesn't have to be brief.
[01:10:18.220 --> 01:10:24.220]  And complaints are intended to be written by ordinary citizens.
[01:10:24.220 --> 01:10:30.220]  So they don't expect it to be written in legalese.
[01:10:30.220 --> 01:10:33.220]  And they don't expect you to cover every single day.
[01:10:33.220 --> 01:10:38.220]  So I've seen your work.
[01:10:38.220 --> 01:10:40.220]  I don't think you have a problem at all.
[01:10:40.220 --> 01:10:43.220]  You do nice work.
[01:10:43.220 --> 01:10:44.220]  Okay.
[01:10:44.220 --> 01:10:49.220]  But in my letter to the Grand Jury Foreman, I don't know the person's name,
[01:10:49.220 --> 01:10:54.220]  and so I'm going to be sending it to the Grand Jury Foreman as a title,
[01:10:54.220 --> 01:10:59.220]  and in there I'm going to ask that person to respond to me in writing,
[01:10:59.220 --> 01:11:05.220]  verifying that they got my letter.
[01:11:05.220 --> 01:11:09.220]  You know, I really can't ask for their initials,
[01:11:09.220 --> 01:11:13.220]  but I have no way of knowing if those initials are not.
[01:11:13.220 --> 01:11:21.220]  This is really just...this is for the U.S. attorney's consumption.
[01:11:21.220 --> 01:11:22.220]  Uh-huh.
[01:11:22.220 --> 01:11:24.220]  He's going to read this letter,
[01:11:24.220 --> 01:11:30.220]  and you're trying to give notice to the foreman that he's got a rubber stamp
[01:11:30.220 --> 01:11:32.220]  with the foreman's name on it.
[01:11:32.220 --> 01:11:35.220]  He is not going to like it that you know that.
[01:11:35.220 --> 01:11:36.220]  Okay.
[01:11:36.220 --> 01:11:43.220]  That's telling him that this is not your first rodeo.
[01:11:43.220 --> 01:11:44.220]  Okay.
[01:11:44.220 --> 01:11:50.220]  We really don't expect the Grand Jury to ever see this document,
[01:11:50.220 --> 01:11:55.220]  but the next one will be against him,
[01:11:55.220 --> 01:12:02.220]  and then all of these documents will wind up going to the attorney general,
[01:12:02.220 --> 01:12:07.220]  throwing chapter and verse of what the U.S. attorney should have done, didn't they?
[01:12:07.220 --> 01:12:10.220]  Okay.
[01:12:10.220 --> 01:12:14.220]  And that's when he's likely to get some feedback saying...
[01:12:14.220 --> 01:12:17.220]  It's going back out tomorrow, so...
[01:12:17.220 --> 01:12:19.220]  Okay, wonderful.
[01:12:19.220 --> 01:12:25.220]  We're having a little trouble talking over each other because of this telephone situation.
[01:12:25.220 --> 01:12:31.220]  But it should start getting hot here pretty soon.
[01:12:31.220 --> 01:12:35.220]  So I'm looking forward to it, so...
[01:12:35.220 --> 01:12:36.220]  Okay.
[01:12:36.220 --> 01:12:39.220]  Is there anything else for Scott?
[01:12:39.220 --> 01:12:40.220]  Nope.
[01:12:40.220 --> 01:12:42.220]  Thank you very much, and I'll talk to you soon.
[01:12:42.220 --> 01:12:43.220]  Thank you.
[01:12:43.220 --> 01:12:44.220]  Thank you.
[01:12:44.220 --> 01:12:45.220]  Okay.
[01:12:45.220 --> 01:12:54.220]  Now we're going to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:12:54.220 --> 01:13:03.220]  Olivier, you there?
[01:13:03.220 --> 01:13:09.220]  Yes, I'm trying to.
[01:13:09.220 --> 01:13:11.220]  I got two letters today,
[01:13:11.220 --> 01:13:17.220]  and two letters from the federal court dismissing my cases,
[01:13:17.220 --> 01:13:22.220]  and they did it so spontaneously.
[01:13:22.220 --> 01:13:25.220]  Oh, that's interesting.
[01:13:25.220 --> 01:13:26.220]  Did they?
[01:13:26.220 --> 01:13:28.220]  Okay.
[01:13:28.220 --> 01:13:39.220]  The federal court can do that if you file an inability to pay.
[01:13:39.220 --> 01:13:40.220]  That...
[01:13:40.220 --> 01:13:41.220]  Yes.
[01:13:41.220 --> 01:13:46.220]  Now you just ask for a findings of fact that's included as well.
[01:13:46.220 --> 01:13:49.220]  In order for there actually to be a dismissal,
[01:13:49.220 --> 01:13:55.220]  there has to be an order, and there has to be a judgment.
[01:13:55.220 --> 01:14:01.220]  The judgment is your findings of fact that's included as well.
[01:14:01.220 --> 01:14:04.220]  I got an order and a memorandum.
[01:14:04.220 --> 01:14:09.220]  That's what you need for now to give...
[01:14:09.220 --> 01:14:15.220]  First thing you want to do is start putting together an appeal.
[01:14:15.220 --> 01:14:20.220]  And the original...
[01:14:20.220 --> 01:14:31.220]  The first thing you do is send your brief to the judge as a motion for reconsideration.
[01:14:31.220 --> 01:14:35.220]  You look at his reasons for dismissing.
[01:14:35.220 --> 01:14:40.220]  You show why the reasons are incorrect and why he should reconsider.
[01:14:40.220 --> 01:14:45.220]  But that will get you a brief halfway done.
[01:14:45.220 --> 01:14:49.220]  So right now you want to give in a motion for reconsideration.
[01:14:49.220 --> 01:14:53.220]  But when you write a motion for reconsideration,
[01:14:53.220 --> 01:14:58.220]  you write your own findings of fact and conclusions as well.
[01:14:58.220 --> 01:15:00.220]  And you say, here are the facts,
[01:15:00.220 --> 01:15:04.220]  and these are the conclusions the court should have came through.
[01:15:04.220 --> 01:15:17.220]  The court can either accept yours or produce their own to show why your brief is not substantial.
[01:15:17.220 --> 01:15:18.220]  And they'll probably do nothing.
[01:15:18.220 --> 01:15:22.220]  They'll just deny it.
[01:15:22.220 --> 01:15:28.220]  And so once you've done that now, the appeal's clock starts when you start the appeal.
[01:15:28.220 --> 01:15:32.220]  You don't expect to win in the trial court in any case.
[01:15:32.220 --> 01:15:36.220]  You don't expect to win in the appeal.
[01:15:36.220 --> 01:15:40.220]  Go ahead.
[01:15:40.220 --> 01:15:41.220]  Okay.
[01:15:41.220 --> 01:15:42.220]  All right.
[01:15:42.220 --> 01:15:45.220]  I'm kind of hearing your language, but to me it's a problem,
[01:15:45.220 --> 01:15:49.220]  because it's like it's okay for them just to dismiss it.
[01:15:49.220 --> 01:15:56.220]  When, number one, they're saying that they're dismissing it because I failed to state a claim.
[01:15:56.220 --> 01:16:03.220]  How is my cards being taken from my possession not stating a claim?
[01:16:03.220 --> 01:16:04.220]  Okay.
[01:16:04.220 --> 01:16:05.220]  Hang on.
[01:16:05.220 --> 01:16:06.220]  Hang on.
[01:16:06.220 --> 01:16:07.220]  What's happening?
[01:16:07.220 --> 01:16:11.220]  If they did a rule, if they dismiss on the Rule 12b6,
[01:16:11.220 --> 01:16:17.220]  then they essentially cannot dismiss with prejudice,
[01:16:17.220 --> 01:16:23.220]  because the Rule 12b6 gives you the right to appeal.
[01:16:23.220 --> 01:16:27.220]  Now you, I mean to amend.
[01:16:27.220 --> 01:16:39.220]  So you petition the courts for a right to, you're just filing an amended suit.
[01:16:39.220 --> 01:16:44.220]  And you based it on, hang on, we're about to go to break.
[01:16:44.220 --> 01:16:46.220]  I hear the music.
[01:16:46.220 --> 01:16:53.220]  Brenda Kelton, Deborah Stevens, The Wheel of Life Radio, I call you number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:53.220 --> 01:17:00.220]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.220 --> 01:17:01.220]  I love Logos.
[01:17:01.220 --> 01:17:04.220]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:17:04.220 --> 01:17:07.220]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:17:07.220 --> 01:17:08.220]  I need my truth fix.
[01:17:08.220 --> 01:17:10.220]  I'd be lost without Logos.
[01:17:10.220 --> 01:17:13.220]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:17:13.220 --> 01:17:16.220]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite
[01:17:16.220 --> 01:17:20.220]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:17:20.220 --> 01:17:22.220]  How can I help Logos?
[01:17:22.220 --> 01:17:24.220]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:17:24.220 --> 01:17:27.220]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos
[01:17:27.220 --> 01:17:29.220]  with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:17:29.220 --> 01:17:31.220]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:17:31.220 --> 01:17:35.220]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:17:35.220 --> 01:17:38.220]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:17:38.220 --> 01:17:41.220]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link
[01:17:41.220 --> 01:17:43.220]  and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.220 --> 01:17:44.220]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.220 --> 01:17:45.220]  No.
[01:17:45.220 --> 01:17:47.220]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.220 --> 01:17:48.220]  No.
[01:17:48.220 --> 01:17:49.220]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:49.220 --> 01:17:50.220]  No.
[01:17:50.220 --> 01:17:51.220]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.220 --> 01:17:52.220]  Wow.
[01:17:52.220 --> 01:17:54.220]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:17:54.220 --> 01:17:55.220]  This is perfect.
[01:17:55.220 --> 01:17:57.220]  Thank you so much.
[01:17:57.220 --> 01:17:58.220]  We are welcome.
[01:17:58.220 --> 01:18:00.220]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:00.220 --> 01:18:05.220]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.220 --> 01:18:09.220]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:18:09.220 --> 01:18:13.220]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[01:18:13.220 --> 01:18:15.220]  and now you can win too.
[01:18:15.220 --> 01:18:19.220]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[01:18:19.220 --> 01:18:21.220]  using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:18:21.220 --> 01:18:25.220]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[01:18:25.220 --> 01:18:27.220]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:18:27.220 --> 01:18:29.220]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:18:29.220 --> 01:18:34.220]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.220 --> 01:18:39.220]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.220 --> 01:18:41.220]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.220 --> 01:18:44.220]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:18:44.220 --> 01:18:49.220]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:49.220 --> 01:18:57.220]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:18:57.220 --> 01:19:01.220]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:01.220 --> 01:19:08.220]  This is the Logos from Radio Net.
[01:19:31.220 --> 01:19:59.220]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:59.220 --> 01:20:04.220]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:20:04.220 --> 01:20:08.220]  Okay, Olivier, go ahead.
[01:20:08.220 --> 01:20:09.220]  Yeah, all right.
[01:20:09.220 --> 01:20:10.220]  All that's a waste of time.
[01:20:10.220 --> 01:20:13.220]  I mean, I understand what you're saying.
[01:20:13.220 --> 01:20:15.220]  And to me, it's like a waste of time.
[01:20:15.220 --> 01:20:19.220]  If you dismiss my complaint to the Sponte
[01:20:19.220 --> 01:20:23.220]  without even the defendant getting anything,
[01:20:23.220 --> 01:20:30.220]  and it's clearly that my rights have been deprived,
[01:20:30.220 --> 01:20:32.220]  I don't feel that, I don't think all that is necessary,
[01:20:32.220 --> 01:20:35.220]  going back to them and the men depleted and all that,
[01:20:35.220 --> 01:20:39.220]  because I found case law that says that they are restricted
[01:20:39.220 --> 01:20:49.220]  from dismissing pro se political cases.
[01:20:49.220 --> 01:20:51.220]  And that's in the federal courts.
[01:20:51.220 --> 01:20:58.220]  Okay, there are steps you have to take before you can give the appeal.
[01:20:58.220 --> 01:21:07.220]  In the Fed, if you're dismissed, before your case is right for appeal,
[01:21:07.220 --> 01:21:12.220]  you have to petition the court for reconsideration
[01:21:12.220 --> 01:21:15.220]  and show why the court should reconsider.
[01:21:15.220 --> 01:21:19.220]  You're claiming the court made an error,
[01:21:19.220 --> 01:21:25.220]  and the courts want you to give them notice of the error
[01:21:25.220 --> 01:21:28.220]  and show them why they should correct it
[01:21:28.220 --> 01:21:30.220]  before it goes to the appeal court.
[01:21:30.220 --> 01:21:33.220]  So this is the step you have to take to get there.
[01:21:33.220 --> 01:21:35.220]  All right, I understand that.
[01:21:35.220 --> 01:21:37.220]  I understand it, and I agree with it.
[01:21:37.220 --> 01:21:41.220]  But is that going to prolong my case,
[01:21:41.220 --> 01:21:47.220]  or is that going to make my case proceed in a short time?
[01:21:47.220 --> 01:21:50.220]  It will prolong it somewhat.
[01:21:50.220 --> 01:21:51.220]  It will prolong it.
[01:21:51.220 --> 01:21:54.220]  Okay, I'm tired of prolonging, because I found here,
[01:21:54.220 --> 01:22:00.220]  the federal court said that unless the district court,
[01:22:00.220 --> 01:22:03.220]  unless the district judge gives a notice
[01:22:03.220 --> 01:22:07.220]  and gives time for the pro se complaint,
[01:22:07.220 --> 01:22:11.220]  pro se plaintiffs to fix and correct,
[01:22:11.220 --> 01:22:14.220]  that's an automatic grounds for appeal.
[01:22:14.220 --> 01:22:19.220]  All those prerequisites don't mean anything.
[01:22:19.220 --> 01:22:24.220]  So the only letter I got was your filing,
[01:22:24.220 --> 01:22:29.220]  your indigency filing is accepted and your case is dismissed.
[01:22:29.220 --> 01:22:30.220]  Oh, okay.
[01:22:30.220 --> 01:22:34.220]  So if you have a case law that says it's automatic,
[01:22:34.220 --> 01:22:37.220]  opens the door to appeal, then go ahead and appeal.
[01:22:37.220 --> 01:22:41.220]  If they don't like it,
[01:22:41.220 --> 01:22:44.220]  then they will tell you that you have to file a motion
[01:22:44.220 --> 01:22:45.220]  for reconsideration.
[01:22:45.220 --> 01:22:50.220]  I would suggest that you do them both.
[01:22:50.220 --> 01:22:52.220]  If you file the appeal.
[01:22:52.220 --> 01:22:53.220]  I don't have time tonight.
[01:22:53.220 --> 01:22:58.220]  My finances and what I need to do, I need to fast track.
[01:22:58.220 --> 01:23:02.220]  And to me, I know I've read another case law saying
[01:23:02.220 --> 01:23:04.220]  that when a judge does do that,
[01:23:04.220 --> 01:23:08.220]  that's due process violation against them,
[01:23:08.220 --> 01:23:12.220]  against the person who was doing the suit.
[01:23:12.220 --> 01:23:14.220]  And to me, I'm feeling it.
[01:23:14.220 --> 01:23:16.220]  Well, I still have some support,
[01:23:16.220 --> 01:23:19.220]  but I'm used to being on my own and doing my own.
[01:23:19.220 --> 01:23:21.220]  They have my own.
[01:23:21.220 --> 01:23:27.220]  And these violations are really pissing me off.
[01:23:27.220 --> 01:23:29.220]  I understand.
[01:23:29.220 --> 01:23:30.220]  We're supposed to be free.
[01:23:30.220 --> 01:23:33.220]  I ain't got time to be stalling because you're ignorant.
[01:23:33.220 --> 01:23:35.220]  And he just became a judge.
[01:23:35.220 --> 01:23:38.220]  He's been in the office in April.
[01:23:38.220 --> 01:23:39.220]  He just got in the office.
[01:23:39.220 --> 01:23:42.220]  He got appointed by Obama in the office in April.
[01:23:42.220 --> 01:23:49.220]  Do you need to file a judicial conduct complaint against him?
[01:23:49.220 --> 01:23:54.220]  If he's new in office, he is not going to like that one bit.
[01:23:54.220 --> 01:23:59.220]  I can't file a lawsuit against him for a due process violation?
[01:23:59.220 --> 01:24:00.220]  No.
[01:24:00.220 --> 01:24:04.220]  You cannot sue a sitting judge for a due process violation.
[01:24:04.220 --> 01:24:09.220]  You're charging criminals.
[01:24:09.220 --> 01:24:12.220]  You can't sue him.
[01:24:12.220 --> 01:24:15.220]  So who do you sue for a due process violation?
[01:24:15.220 --> 01:24:20.220]  You sue the U.S. government.
[01:24:20.220 --> 01:24:25.220]  Oh, so I got to sue the U.S. government because of the judge?
[01:24:25.220 --> 01:24:27.220]  Exactly.
[01:24:27.220 --> 01:24:29.220]  They're the ones that sanctions him.
[01:24:29.220 --> 01:24:34.220]  They're the ones that grant him his authority, so they're the ones responsible for him.
[01:24:34.220 --> 01:24:41.220]  And that will make them real unhappy to sue that judge.
[01:24:41.220 --> 01:24:45.220]  He's a new judge, and he gets hammered in the feet right away.
[01:24:45.220 --> 01:24:49.220]  That is not going to look good for him.
[01:24:49.220 --> 01:24:50.220]  That's great.
[01:24:50.220 --> 01:24:51.220]  That's what I'm talking about.
[01:24:51.220 --> 01:24:59.220]  My next complaint needs to be U.S. Marshal Olivier versus U.S. government?
[01:24:59.220 --> 01:25:01.220]  Yes.
[01:25:01.220 --> 01:25:05.220]  And I file that in the district court tomorrow morning?
[01:25:05.220 --> 01:25:09.220]  Absolutely.
[01:25:09.220 --> 01:25:10.220]  Okay.
[01:25:10.220 --> 01:25:17.220]  And I reference everything that the judge did, and I put case law that forbids him.
[01:25:17.220 --> 01:25:22.220]  I filed the case law that forbids him from doing that and states that that is a suit
[01:25:22.220 --> 01:25:28.220]  against him because of the due process violation against the plaintiff.
[01:25:28.220 --> 01:25:31.220]  And then is that enough conclusive?
[01:25:31.220 --> 01:25:36.220]  Is that enough to start it off?
[01:25:36.220 --> 01:25:38.220]  Well, it's enough to start the suit.
[01:25:38.220 --> 01:25:39.220]  Absolutely.
[01:25:39.220 --> 01:25:41.220]  You can always amend it later.
[01:25:41.220 --> 01:25:46.220]  But you still should pursue your current case.
[01:25:46.220 --> 01:25:47.220]  No, no, no, no.
[01:25:47.220 --> 01:25:49.220]  I'm going to keep on going.
[01:25:49.220 --> 01:25:50.220]  Okay.
[01:25:50.220 --> 01:25:51.220]  Stay there, mate.
[01:25:51.220 --> 01:25:52.220]  I'm going to add.
[01:25:52.220 --> 01:25:53.220]  Okay.
[01:25:53.220 --> 01:26:01.220]  What I was saying about if the judge's act gives you an automatic right to appeal, these
[01:26:01.220 --> 01:26:04.220]  guys like to screw you on procedure.
[01:26:04.220 --> 01:26:10.220]  I had a problem here in our district court in Texas where I was afraid they were going
[01:26:10.220 --> 01:26:11.220]  to do that.
[01:26:11.220 --> 01:26:21.220]  So I filed a notice of appeal, and they take 30, 60, 70, 80 days, and they come back and
[01:26:21.220 --> 01:26:25.220]  say, well, you had to file a notice of reconsideration first.
[01:26:25.220 --> 01:26:31.220]  And then I say, oh, okay, and I go back to file the reconsideration, and the court says,
[01:26:31.220 --> 01:26:34.220]  oh, well, you don't have time to do that.
[01:26:34.220 --> 01:26:38.220]  So I filed both of them at the same time.
[01:26:38.220 --> 01:26:50.220]  If you file a notice of appeal early, it sits in the record dormant until the case becomes
[01:26:50.220 --> 01:26:51.220]  ripe for appeal.
[01:26:51.220 --> 01:26:59.220]  So if you file them both and you don't need the motion for reconsideration, the appeal
[01:26:59.220 --> 01:27:00.220]  just goes through.
[01:27:00.220 --> 01:27:07.220]  If they don't object to the appeal, then you can move to rescind the motion for reconsideration.
[01:27:07.220 --> 01:27:11.220]  And most likely, the judge will just ignore it anyway.
[01:27:11.220 --> 01:27:18.220]  But this makes sure they don't pull a procedural maneuver on you and run you out of time.
[01:27:18.220 --> 01:27:20.220]  Does that make sense?
[01:27:20.220 --> 01:27:21.220]  It makes sense.
[01:27:21.220 --> 01:27:24.220]  I see what you're worried about.
[01:27:24.220 --> 01:27:34.220]  But I'm looking at U.S. 1992, U.S. appeal court decision that said that once that happened,
[01:27:34.220 --> 01:27:41.220]  the judge has automatically given me what the requirements I need for appeal.
[01:27:41.220 --> 01:27:42.220]  Oh, good.
[01:27:42.220 --> 01:27:43.220]  Wonderful.
[01:27:43.220 --> 01:27:48.220]  I need you to send me your case law.
[01:27:48.220 --> 01:27:51.220]  You're going to save me a lot of work.
[01:27:51.220 --> 01:27:55.220]  Yeah, that's all I have.
[01:27:55.220 --> 01:28:00.220]  Now, I want to—and then I know from the case law where it's saying that—are you
[01:28:00.220 --> 01:28:04.220]  telling me it's Morticia Oliver versus U.S. government?
[01:28:04.220 --> 01:28:09.220]  And it's in the same—I sue them—I sue the U.S. government in the same district court
[01:28:09.220 --> 01:28:11.220]  that I've been filing my other suits.
[01:28:11.220 --> 01:28:12.220]  Same process.
[01:28:12.220 --> 01:28:13.220]  Yep.
[01:28:13.220 --> 01:28:14.220]  Yep.
[01:28:14.220 --> 01:28:24.220]  And this is—since the judge has already thrown out your suit, then there's nothing
[01:28:24.220 --> 01:28:29.220]  for him to be compromised in because he's already dismissed it.
[01:28:29.220 --> 01:28:34.220]  So he—they can't claim that you're compromising the judge.
[01:28:34.220 --> 01:28:36.220]  The suit's over.
[01:28:36.220 --> 01:28:44.220]  Now, if the court approves your appeal and kicks it back to the district court, then
[01:28:44.220 --> 01:28:49.220]  you'll have to—then you'll have to move to recuse this judge.
[01:28:49.220 --> 01:28:54.220]  Good, because I got to process out on it.
[01:28:54.220 --> 01:28:59.220]  And you just—you're following the same process.
[01:28:59.220 --> 01:29:01.220]  You're just cranking it up a bit.
[01:29:01.220 --> 01:29:04.220]  And now you're up in the feds.
[01:29:04.220 --> 01:29:09.220]  And when you start getting the feds upset, they're going to get upset at the state for
[01:29:09.220 --> 01:29:12.220]  suing you up there to annoy them.
[01:29:12.220 --> 01:29:18.220]  And good chance that judge is going to tell these guys, don't you send that guy back to me.
[01:29:18.220 --> 01:29:19.220]  Well, it's too late.
[01:29:19.220 --> 01:29:20.220]  It's awful.
[01:29:20.220 --> 01:29:24.220]  I'm 21 and lost with the feds.
[01:29:24.220 --> 01:29:25.220]  I'm probably 21 and lost with the feds.
[01:29:25.220 --> 01:29:28.220]  And that's why I was neglecting to go with your idea because I ain't got time to play
[01:29:28.220 --> 01:29:29.220]  games.
[01:29:29.220 --> 01:29:33.220]  When you see my name, I respect you to follow the rules.
[01:29:33.220 --> 01:29:36.220]  And here's my case because I ain't got time to play games.
[01:29:36.220 --> 01:29:37.220]  I got more to file.
[01:29:37.220 --> 01:29:45.220]  So when they do this, I was thinking—because I got two judges who already—
[01:29:45.220 --> 01:29:46.220]  Hey, wait, wait, wait.
[01:29:46.220 --> 01:29:47.220]  Hang on.
[01:29:47.220 --> 01:29:48.220]  Hang on.
[01:29:48.220 --> 01:29:49.220]  We're about to go to break.
[01:29:49.220 --> 01:29:50.220]  We have the Stevens rule on radio.
[01:29:50.220 --> 01:29:51.220]  I call it number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:51.220 --> 01:29:52.220]  We'll be right back.
[01:29:52.220 --> 01:29:53.220]  Attention, morning coffee drinkers.
[01:29:53.220 --> 01:29:54.220]  The FBI says if you paid cash for that cup of Joe, you may be a potential terrorist.
[01:29:54.220 --> 01:29:55.220]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you how the feds want to track your
[01:29:55.220 --> 01:29:56.220]  coffee habits next.
[01:29:56.220 --> 01:29:57.220]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:29:57.220 --> 01:30:22.220]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.220 --> 01:30:27.220]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:27.220 --> 01:30:32.220]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.220 --> 01:30:34.220]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:30:34.220 --> 01:30:40.220]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.220 --> 01:30:42.220]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.220 --> 01:30:44.220]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.220 --> 01:30:47.220]  What does a terrorist look like?
[01:30:47.220 --> 01:30:51.220]  According to the FBI, it could be anyone who cares about privacy.
[01:30:51.220 --> 01:30:55.220]  Shielding their IP address on the web and always paying with cash.
[01:30:55.220 --> 01:31:00.220]  No joke, pay cash for a cup of coffee, and the FBI says you, too, may be a potential
[01:31:00.220 --> 01:31:01.220]  criminal.
[01:31:01.220 --> 01:31:06.220]  It's all on a flyer the FBI is circulating among Internet cafe owners, urging them to
[01:31:06.220 --> 01:31:08.220]  spy on their patrons.
[01:31:08.220 --> 01:31:10.220]  Are customers hiding their screens from view?
[01:31:10.220 --> 01:31:16.220]  Are they making voiceover IP calls or using Google Earth to look at, say, train stations?
[01:31:16.220 --> 01:31:21.220]  Report them all, says the FBI, and become a member of the police state.
[01:31:21.220 --> 01:31:30.220]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:30.220 --> 01:31:36.220]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.220 --> 01:31:38.220]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.220 --> 01:31:43.220]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.220 --> 01:31:46.220]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.220 --> 01:31:48.220]  Thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[01:31:48.220 --> 01:31:50.220]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.220 --> 01:31:51.220]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.220 --> 01:31:52.220]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.220 --> 01:31:53.220]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.220 --> 01:31:55.220]  I'm the father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.220 --> 01:31:57.220]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.220 --> 01:32:00.220]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.220 --> 01:32:03.220]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.220 --> 01:32:06.220]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.220 --> 01:32:10.220]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[01:32:10.220 --> 01:32:11.220]  them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.220 --> 01:32:14.220]  Hey, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.220 --> 01:32:18.220]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:32:18.220 --> 01:32:21.220]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.220 --> 01:32:22.220]  And we accept Bitcoin.
[01:32:22.220 --> 01:32:26.220]  As a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints, you
[01:32:26.220 --> 01:32:31.220]  can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[01:32:31.220 --> 01:32:32.220]  first time.
[01:32:32.220 --> 01:32:38.220]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.220 --> 01:32:42.220]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos
[01:32:42.220 --> 01:32:45.220]  Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.220 --> 01:32:50.220]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.220 --> 01:32:56.220]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.220 --> 01:32:58.220]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.220 --> 01:33:01.220]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.220 --> 01:33:11.220]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:31.220 --> 01:33:52.220]  Okay.
[01:33:52.220 --> 01:33:53.220]  We are back.
[01:33:53.220 --> 01:33:56.220]  We got the technical difficulties handled.
[01:33:56.220 --> 01:33:58.220]  I'm off that phone.
[01:33:58.220 --> 01:33:59.220]  Okay.
[01:33:59.220 --> 01:34:02.220]  Go ahead, Olivier.
[01:34:02.220 --> 01:34:03.220]  All right.
[01:34:03.220 --> 01:34:11.220]  So I was trying to see what kind of policies are going to play out when I file suits.
[01:34:11.220 --> 01:34:12.220]  I got 21 suits.
[01:34:12.220 --> 01:34:19.220]  So right now, three of them came back, two of spontane, two from this black judge named
[01:34:19.220 --> 01:34:22.220]  Crystal, and one from this other.
[01:34:22.220 --> 01:34:23.220]  Okay.
[01:34:23.220 --> 01:34:24.220]  Okay.
[01:34:24.220 --> 01:34:25.220]  Hold on.
[01:34:25.220 --> 01:34:34.220]  It's especially in the Fed to look close at what they told you that's the reason that
[01:34:34.220 --> 01:34:37.220]  they dismissed the case.
[01:34:37.220 --> 01:34:39.220]  I'm so interested.
[01:34:39.220 --> 01:34:47.220]  Because generally, these judges are very good at instructing lawyers and litigants.
[01:34:47.220 --> 01:34:50.220]  They don't just blow off your suit.
[01:34:50.220 --> 01:34:55.220]  They say, here's what's wrong with it.
[01:34:55.220 --> 01:34:58.220]  Here's what you have to do to fix it.
[01:34:58.220 --> 01:35:01.220]  And they did not dismiss with prejudice.
[01:35:01.220 --> 01:35:08.220]  That means you can file an amended pleading.
[01:35:08.220 --> 01:35:13.220]  They don't have the power to dismiss it unless the other person files a motion, unless the
[01:35:13.220 --> 01:35:15.220]  defending party file a motion.
[01:35:15.220 --> 01:35:18.220]  The defending party, they wouldn't get the suit.
[01:35:18.220 --> 01:35:19.220]  Okay.
[01:35:19.220 --> 01:35:31.220]  This raises an issue because when a party files a suit with inability to pay, then the
[01:35:31.220 --> 01:35:33.220]  courts are allowed to dismiss the spontane.
[01:35:33.220 --> 01:35:37.220]  And this came about mainly because of guys in prison.
[01:35:37.220 --> 01:35:41.220]  Guys in prison were necessarily indigent.
[01:35:41.220 --> 01:35:46.220]  And they didn't have anything else to do all day but file suits.
[01:35:46.220 --> 01:35:50.220]  So they're filing one suit after another.
[01:35:50.220 --> 01:35:55.220]  What year case file are you using?
[01:35:55.220 --> 01:36:01.220]  I don't remember it offhand.
[01:36:01.220 --> 01:36:03.220]  It may be statute.
[01:36:03.220 --> 01:36:06.220]  I think it's in the rules, if I remember correctly.
[01:36:06.220 --> 01:36:11.220]  I'm looking at case file here from 1992 on the current page.
[01:36:11.220 --> 01:36:14.220]  I know I could find case file more relevant than that.
[01:36:14.220 --> 01:36:16.220]  You might.
[01:36:16.220 --> 01:36:22.220]  And check in the rules on filing with inability to pay because I know we've had that issue
[01:36:22.220 --> 01:36:23.220]  here.
[01:36:23.220 --> 01:36:25.220]  And I believe it was in the rules.
[01:36:25.220 --> 01:36:27.220]  I don't believe it was case law.
[01:36:27.220 --> 01:36:28.220]  No.
[01:36:28.220 --> 01:36:31.220]  Well, I'm in the case file right now and I'm looking at case file.
[01:36:31.220 --> 01:36:35.220]  Suppose they lit against who filed from jail or from jail.
[01:36:35.220 --> 01:36:39.220]  And I know they're indigent.
[01:36:39.220 --> 01:36:40.220]  Yes.
[01:36:40.220 --> 01:36:46.220]  The courts, what they said in this was that they were getting so many filings from guys
[01:36:46.220 --> 01:36:51.220]  in jail, had nothing else to do all day, but file frivolous lawsuits.
[01:36:51.220 --> 01:36:58.220]  And so in order to short circuit that, the judge was authorized to look at the suit before
[01:36:58.220 --> 01:37:04.220]  the other side was forced to go to the expense of responding to the suit.
[01:37:04.220 --> 01:37:08.220]  And if the suit was frivolous, the judge could dismiss it for responding.
[01:37:08.220 --> 01:37:11.220]  So there is precedent for that.
[01:37:11.220 --> 01:37:16.220]  You might want to find it before you go after the judge.
[01:37:16.220 --> 01:37:23.220]  But before he could do it, before he could do it, he has to contact the complaining party
[01:37:23.220 --> 01:37:24.220]  and make him fix it.
[01:37:24.220 --> 01:37:26.220]  I found that in this case.
[01:37:26.220 --> 01:37:28.220]  It says that.
[01:37:28.220 --> 01:37:29.220]  Okay.
[01:37:29.220 --> 01:37:32.220]  That's a 1992 case?
[01:37:32.220 --> 01:37:33.220]  Yes.
[01:37:33.220 --> 01:37:41.220]  Okay, you might see if you can do an internet search for that case and see who else cites
[01:37:41.220 --> 01:37:42.220]  that case.
[01:37:42.220 --> 01:37:47.220]  You might find a much more current case.
[01:37:47.220 --> 01:37:52.220]  Well, in the case, it has other...
[01:37:52.220 --> 01:37:54.220]  Yeah, but that's going backwards.
[01:37:54.220 --> 01:37:57.220]  You need to go forward in time.
[01:37:57.220 --> 01:37:58.220]  That's a 92 case.
[01:37:58.220 --> 01:38:01.220]  That's 20 years old.
[01:38:01.220 --> 01:38:05.220]  25 years old, a quarter of a century.
[01:38:05.220 --> 01:38:08.220]  All the law changes every 20 years.
[01:38:08.220 --> 01:38:14.220]  So you need to find something later and just run that case name and see what other cases
[01:38:14.220 --> 01:38:22.220]  you get citing it and see if you can find a recent case that has cited that one.
[01:38:22.220 --> 01:38:23.220]  Okay.
[01:38:23.220 --> 01:38:30.220]  So what kind of policy is going to play out when I start throwing in the US lawsuits?
[01:38:30.220 --> 01:38:32.220]  Because I have 21 of them right now.
[01:38:32.220 --> 01:38:37.220]  So when I start throwing in the US lawsuits, the three of them is pro-business, pro-state
[01:38:37.220 --> 01:38:38.220]  legal...
[01:38:38.220 --> 01:38:40.220]  I mean, it's so spontaneous already.
[01:38:40.220 --> 01:38:44.220]  Saying that after the 32 state came, it said...
[01:38:44.220 --> 01:38:47.220]  Well, look at what they're saying.
[01:38:47.220 --> 01:38:58.220]  So the next time you file one, you make sure you short circuit that reason for them dismissing.
[01:38:58.220 --> 01:39:03.220]  They're instructing you on how they're going to screw you.
[01:39:03.220 --> 01:39:10.220]  So pay close attention to what they're saying so that in the next suit you can bypass it.
[01:39:10.220 --> 01:39:19.220]  I've had so much trouble with the 12b6 issue that in the foreclosure side, the first thing
[01:39:19.220 --> 01:39:31.220]  I want to do is file a petition for declaratory judgment and under 28 USC, what is it?
[01:39:31.220 --> 01:39:34.220]  2201.
[01:39:34.220 --> 01:39:45.220]  That statute creates a special right and it allows you to petition the court for a determination
[01:39:45.220 --> 01:39:49.220]  of the rights of the parties.
[01:39:49.220 --> 01:39:59.220]  If you're having too much trouble with them dismissing suesponte, you might consider filing
[01:39:59.220 --> 01:40:05.220]  the initial suit as a petition for declaratory judgment.
[01:40:05.220 --> 01:40:14.220]  Ask the court to declare your rights and declare that the other side violated your rights.
[01:40:14.220 --> 01:40:19.220]  You're not asking for any harm.
[01:40:19.220 --> 01:40:26.220]  You're not making a claim for recovery.
[01:40:26.220 --> 01:40:31.220]  12b6 goes to failure to state a claim on which recovery can be had.
[01:40:31.220 --> 01:40:39.220]  I filed a quiet title action that petitioned the court to make a determination of who had
[01:40:39.220 --> 01:40:45.220]  standing to enforce a lien against the property and federal judge McBride gets it.
[01:40:45.220 --> 01:40:49.220]  He dismisses with prejudice for failure to state a claim.
[01:40:49.220 --> 01:40:51.220]  Well, duh.
[01:40:51.220 --> 01:40:56.220]  Of course I failed to state a claim because it was a declaratory judgment suit.
[01:40:56.220 --> 01:40:58.220]  There is no claim.
[01:40:58.220 --> 01:41:02.220]  I'm filing criminally against the judge for that.
[01:41:02.220 --> 01:41:06.220]  He dismissed with prejudice even.
[01:41:06.220 --> 01:41:11.220]  The same day I non-suited it and I'm still filing criminal charges against him.
[01:41:11.220 --> 01:41:17.220]  You might look at your next suit as declaratory judgment only.
[01:41:17.220 --> 01:41:25.220]  What that does is you get the declaratory judgment, then the civil action is a dumb deal.
[01:41:25.220 --> 01:41:39.220]  And it's easier to get them to rule on a petition for declaratory judgment than in a suit for damages.
[01:41:39.220 --> 01:41:42.220]  Does this make sense to you?
[01:41:42.220 --> 01:41:44.220]  Yeah, I think so.
[01:41:44.220 --> 01:41:56.220]  The thing about this is the primary reason they want to dismiss is they don't want you to get to discovery.
[01:41:56.220 --> 01:41:59.220]  They don't want to have to do discovery.
[01:41:59.220 --> 01:42:07.220]  So you use the declaratory judgment suit to bypass the 12b6 dismissal and get to discovery.
[01:42:07.220 --> 01:42:18.220]  Once you've got all your discovery, you can turn around and amend the suit and turn it into a suit for harm, for recovery.
[01:42:18.220 --> 01:42:20.220]  I don't understand that.
[01:42:20.220 --> 01:42:22.220]  Why don't they want to do discovery?
[01:42:22.220 --> 01:42:24.220]  Aren't they there to do a job?
[01:42:24.220 --> 01:42:27.220]  Move the mic a little away from your mouth.
[01:42:27.220 --> 01:42:29.220]  You're distorting the mic somewhat.
[01:42:29.220 --> 01:42:31.220]  I couldn't understand you.
[01:42:31.220 --> 01:42:34.220]  I said why wouldn't they want to do discovery?
[01:42:34.220 --> 01:42:36.220]  Aren't they there to do a job?
[01:42:36.220 --> 01:42:38.220]  What's the cost of money?
[01:42:38.220 --> 01:42:46.220]  Now, for me, when I run into that, the banks can't prove up that they have standing.
[01:42:46.220 --> 01:42:49.220]  So they absolutely do not want to get there.
[01:42:49.220 --> 01:42:53.220]  They want to avoid discovery at all costs.
[01:42:53.220 --> 01:42:59.220]  Yours won't quite be as critical in that regard.
[01:42:59.220 --> 01:43:05.220]  But by doing a declaratory judgment suit first, it's easier.
[01:43:05.220 --> 01:43:09.220]  My declaratory judgment suit's about four pages.
[01:43:09.220 --> 01:43:11.220]  I'm just asking the judge to rule.
[01:43:11.220 --> 01:43:13.220]  Okay, I was arrested.
[01:43:13.220 --> 01:43:17.220]  I was put in jail for this stated reason.
[01:43:17.220 --> 01:43:20.220]  And these are the facts that show this reason isn't valid.
[01:43:20.220 --> 01:43:27.220]  You ask the court to rule that the arresting officer violated your right to due process.
[01:43:27.220 --> 01:43:29.220]  That's it.
[01:43:29.220 --> 01:43:33.220]  You're not asking to determine if I was harmed or how much I was harmed.
[01:43:33.220 --> 01:43:35.220]  I mean, he was a dirty, rotten guy.
[01:43:35.220 --> 01:43:41.220]  You're just asking the judge to rule on the facts and the law to give you a termination.
[01:43:41.220 --> 01:43:49.220]  If the judge says yes, that did violate your due process rights, then you're sued for damages and done deal.
[01:43:49.220 --> 01:43:50.220]  It doesn't matter.
[01:43:50.220 --> 01:43:51.220]  Figure out how much.
[01:43:51.220 --> 01:43:52.220]  Hang on.
[01:43:52.220 --> 01:43:53.220]  Go on to break.
[01:43:53.220 --> 01:43:55.220]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Blue Blood Radio.
[01:43:55.220 --> 01:44:00.220]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.220 --> 01:44:02.220]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:44:02.220 --> 01:44:08.220]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:44:08.220 --> 01:44:12.220]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:44:12.220 --> 01:44:17.220]  and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:44:17.220 --> 01:44:22.220]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:44:22.220 --> 01:44:27.220]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.220 --> 01:44:29.220]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:29.220 --> 01:44:33.220]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts
[01:44:33.220 --> 01:44:39.220]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.220 --> 01:44:48.220]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.220 --> 01:44:57.220]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you only.
[01:44:57.220 --> 01:45:01.220]  HempUSA.org
[01:45:01.220 --> 01:45:04.220]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.220 --> 01:45:11.220]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course
[01:45:11.220 --> 01:45:15.220]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.220 --> 01:45:19.220]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.220 --> 01:45:23.220]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.220 --> 01:45:28.220]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.220 --> 01:45:34.220]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.220 --> 01:45:39.220]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.220 --> 01:45:43.220]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.220 --> 01:45:50.220]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:50.220 --> 01:45:53.220]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.220 --> 01:46:02.220]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:02.220 --> 01:46:21.220]  Okay.
[01:46:21.220 --> 01:46:22.220]  We are back.
[01:46:22.220 --> 01:46:28.220]  Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:46:28.220 --> 01:46:32.220]  Okay. Does that make sense, Olivier?
[01:46:32.220 --> 01:46:36.220]  Yeah, it makes sense, but I don't think I'm going down that avenue right now
[01:46:36.220 --> 01:46:40.220]  because I already filed those 21 suit, and I'm focused down another way.
[01:46:40.220 --> 01:46:45.220]  Now, he violated the law. I want to file suit on him.
[01:46:45.220 --> 01:46:50.220]  And is that going to keep, is that going to, so I got three cases around here
[01:46:50.220 --> 01:46:54.220]  that has failures in state claims.
[01:46:54.220 --> 01:46:59.220]  And I know that I went over this failure to state claim
[01:46:59.220 --> 01:47:01.220]  and make sure I wrote everything in there correctly.
[01:47:01.220 --> 01:47:08.220]  So there is no, there is them saying failure to state claim is a fraudulent educator.
[01:47:08.220 --> 01:47:09.220]  That's fraudulent.
[01:47:09.220 --> 01:47:16.220]  So now when I provide you with government, I just, so they're the defendant?
[01:47:16.220 --> 01:47:19.220]  I mean, they are the, just the...
[01:47:19.220 --> 01:47:22.220]  Yeah, it would be the U.S. government that would be the defendant.
[01:47:22.220 --> 01:47:26.220]  It's the same way as if you sue a sheriff's deputy.
[01:47:26.220 --> 01:47:29.220]  The sheriff's deputy has immunity. You can't sue him.
[01:47:29.220 --> 01:47:32.220]  So you sue the county because it's the county.
[01:47:32.220 --> 01:47:39.220]  If it's a state trooper, he's a state official, you sue the state.
[01:47:39.220 --> 01:47:41.220]  Feds, you sue the federal government.
[01:47:41.220 --> 01:47:44.220]  It would be Olivier v. U.S.
[01:47:44.220 --> 01:47:47.220]  So when I sue the U.S. government, right, and I turn it in,
[01:47:47.220 --> 01:47:51.220]  it's going to go to one of the judges there?
[01:47:51.220 --> 01:47:54.220]  Not this judge, not if he's the one that sued.
[01:47:54.220 --> 01:48:00.220]  It'll go to another, they'll assign it to a court, but it won't be this one.
[01:48:00.220 --> 01:48:04.220]  If where you're at, they only have one district court,
[01:48:04.220 --> 01:48:09.220]  then they will have to bring in a, appoint another judge.
[01:48:09.220 --> 01:48:11.220]  This judge will have to recuse himself.
[01:48:11.220 --> 01:48:15.220]  He can't, certainly can't hear or sue against himself.
[01:48:15.220 --> 01:48:16.220]  Okay.
[01:48:16.220 --> 01:48:21.220]  So that means once I do that, will all the judges know that...
[01:48:21.220 --> 01:48:22.220]  Oh, yes.
[01:48:22.220 --> 01:48:24.220] ...sue against him for a sous-parte?
[01:48:24.220 --> 01:48:27.220]  Oh, yeah, they'll know all about it.
[01:48:27.220 --> 01:48:32.220]  These judges have meetings like once every month or so.
[01:48:32.220 --> 01:48:34.220]  They all sit down and say,
[01:48:34.220 --> 01:48:37.220]  okay, this is the garbage that I had to deal with this month.
[01:48:37.220 --> 01:48:39.220]  This happened, that happened.
[01:48:39.220 --> 01:48:41.220]  And everybody that has something unusual happen,
[01:48:41.220 --> 01:48:45.220]  they sit down with the other judges and discuss it.
[01:48:45.220 --> 01:48:51.220]  So they all find out very quickly.
[01:48:51.220 --> 01:49:01.220]  You can be sure that every judge in West Tennessee knows who you are.
[01:49:01.220 --> 01:49:03.220]  After I do this or before I do this?
[01:49:03.220 --> 01:49:07.220]  They already know.
[01:49:07.220 --> 01:49:10.220]  The first time you file suit, they do,
[01:49:10.220 --> 01:49:14.220]  because these judges sit down and say, you know, this is what's happening.
[01:49:14.220 --> 01:49:16.220]  This is what occurred here.
[01:49:16.220 --> 01:49:17.220]  I got...
[01:49:17.220 --> 01:49:21.220]  Especially if they get sued, that's a big deal for them.
[01:49:21.220 --> 01:49:23.220]  So three lawsuits, turn the tables,
[01:49:23.220 --> 01:49:29.220]  and I shouldn't expect any more sous-partes, correct?
[01:49:29.220 --> 01:49:30.220]  You...
[01:49:30.220 --> 01:49:32.220]  Well, I don't know.
[01:49:32.220 --> 01:49:34.220]  We hope not.
[01:49:34.220 --> 01:49:44.220]  Scott Richardson, he's north of Dallas, or west of Dallas, I'm sorry, east of Dallas.
[01:49:44.220 --> 01:49:46.220]  Rockwall is on the east side of Dallas.
[01:49:46.220 --> 01:49:50.220]  And, you know, he started after them, and they're throwing everything out.
[01:49:50.220 --> 01:49:53.220]  They're ignoring everything he's doing.
[01:49:53.220 --> 01:49:57.220]  Then he starts suing them and filing complaints on them.
[01:49:57.220 --> 01:50:01.220]  And for a while there, he was really frustrated.
[01:50:01.220 --> 01:50:06.220]  But now the worm is beginning to turn.
[01:50:06.220 --> 01:50:11.220]  He went through that part where you're kind of getting to the backside.
[01:50:11.220 --> 01:50:16.220]  You're getting to the point of where things will start turning in your favor as well.
[01:50:16.220 --> 01:50:20.220]  It's a crunch getting to the...
[01:50:20.220 --> 01:50:22.220]  Getting past the initial part.
[01:50:22.220 --> 01:50:27.220]  You've got to have these guys that throw out everything you do.
[01:50:27.220 --> 01:50:29.220]  You just got to expect it.
[01:50:29.220 --> 01:50:39.220]  They do not want guys like you and me being able to get in and use their courts against them.
[01:50:39.220 --> 01:50:43.220]  You've got to expect them to do everything they can to stop you.
[01:50:43.220 --> 01:50:48.220]  You're not going after this federal judge, but you're going after other judges.
[01:50:48.220 --> 01:50:50.220]  They all protect each other.
[01:50:50.220 --> 01:50:56.220]  Because the judges say, there but for chance go I.
[01:50:56.220 --> 01:51:02.220]  There could be somebody doing the same thing to me, and I'll expect this judge to protect me.
[01:51:02.220 --> 01:51:07.220]  Yeah, it's illegal, but they don't care.
[01:51:07.220 --> 01:51:15.220]  What they're not used to is somebody coming back at them who will cram the law right down their throats.
[01:51:15.220 --> 01:51:21.220]  These judges are used to dealing with lawyers that they can control.
[01:51:21.220 --> 01:51:27.220]  These judges can jerk a lawyer's ticket at the drop of a hat.
[01:51:27.220 --> 01:51:38.220]  I've got a guy here in Austin that figured out the Title 18 of the U.S. Code was never properly passed by the legislature in 1948.
[01:51:38.220 --> 01:51:40.220]  A friend of his was a lawyer.
[01:51:40.220 --> 01:51:53.220]  He comes into court, brings this issue, and the federal judges, he proved it with letters from the clerk of the House and the clerk of the Senate.
[01:51:53.220 --> 01:51:57.220]  He absolutely proved that it was never properly passed.
[01:51:57.220 --> 01:52:01.220]  The judge told him, don't you ever bring that into court again.
[01:52:01.220 --> 01:52:03.220]  He brought it into another court.
[01:52:03.220 --> 01:52:08.220]  They pulled his bar card for six months.
[01:52:08.220 --> 01:52:11.220]  What he did was right and legal.
[01:52:11.220 --> 01:52:15.220]  They don't care.
[01:52:15.220 --> 01:52:18.220]  Lawyers, they can control lawyers.
[01:52:18.220 --> 01:52:22.220]  Then they give you.
[01:52:22.220 --> 01:52:34.220]  Now, if you're rich, they can control you, but when you're poor and smart, they don't have any way of controlling you,
[01:52:34.220 --> 01:52:44.220]  especially when they do what they tried to do you or to you in the beginning, arrest you over and over and wear you down.
[01:52:44.220 --> 01:52:48.220]  They didn't get you wore down.
[01:52:48.220 --> 01:52:55.220]  Now, they're on the back side, so you're getting in a good position.
[01:52:55.220 --> 01:52:59.220]  That's enough of my pep talk.
[01:52:59.220 --> 01:53:07.220]  I'm going to sue them and keep them going once the lawsuits hit the table and they see that it's their own people hitting the lawsuits.
[01:53:07.220 --> 01:53:10.220]  The picture should change, right?
[01:53:10.220 --> 01:53:18.220]  It may take a little longer, but you're getting close to that part where this is going to start to change.
[01:53:18.220 --> 01:53:21.220]  We'll probably have Scott on tomorrow night.
[01:53:21.220 --> 01:53:24.220]  He'll talk about this.
[01:53:24.220 --> 01:53:29.220]  It's much different when he goes to court now.
[01:53:29.220 --> 01:53:37.220]  Now, it is a yes, sir, Mr. Richardson, sir.
[01:53:37.220 --> 01:53:40.220]  You know, I'm very adamant about the public and that's everything.
[01:53:40.220 --> 01:53:50.220]  I found out that you need to have an attorney when they lock you up because bail is a critical stage of state criminal procedure.
[01:53:50.220 --> 01:53:54.220]  And you need to have an attorney there, and that's a due process violation.
[01:53:54.220 --> 01:54:01.220]  So I was looking at the statutes and I found a statute 51107.
[01:54:01.220 --> 01:54:07.220]  It says mandate mandamus to enforce county duties.
[01:54:07.220 --> 01:54:19.220]  The performance of any duty made incumbent by law upon the county may be enforced by mandamus from the circuit court.
[01:54:19.220 --> 01:54:24.220]  According to the nature of the case.
[01:54:24.220 --> 01:54:29.220]  Oh, I can see you having fun with that one.
[01:54:29.220 --> 01:54:39.220]  So that means if we're supposed to be represented by a counsel at bail hearing,
[01:54:39.220 --> 01:54:49.220]  we have to force the courts to mandamus the county to make sure all the defendants that are being jailed be represented by an attorney and all.
[01:54:49.220 --> 01:55:01.220]  And that attorney make sure that all defendants that are arrested for misdemeanors without warrants be dismissed or released.
[01:55:01.220 --> 01:55:06.220]  That will make them really, really unhappy.
[01:55:06.220 --> 01:55:13.220]  Yeah, I found another thing in the code stating that driver's licenses, if they're arrested,
[01:55:13.220 --> 01:55:25.220]  they have a right to give their license over, then the jail is supposed to write them a ticket for their license and release them.
[01:55:25.220 --> 01:55:34.220]  And they're still allowed to operate a motor vehicle with that ticket, with the receipt that they got for their license.
[01:55:34.220 --> 01:55:38.220]  That's the way, when I was in Illinois, that's how it was.
[01:55:38.220 --> 01:55:42.220]  If you get a ticket, you just give them your license.
[01:55:42.220 --> 01:55:45.220]  But you can still drive on the ticket because you're just accused.
[01:55:45.220 --> 01:55:48.220]  You're not convicted of anything.
[01:55:48.220 --> 01:55:50.220]  And they held the license as bail.
[01:55:50.220 --> 01:55:53.220]  I thought that was a good idea.
[01:55:53.220 --> 01:55:55.220]  I mean, I found it written down in the law.
[01:55:55.220 --> 01:55:58.220]  So that means it's not provided.
[01:55:58.220 --> 01:55:59.220]  It's not provided.
[01:55:59.220 --> 01:56:05.220]  Is there something else that I can include that the mandamus requires?
[01:56:05.220 --> 01:56:11.220]  You could use the mandamus to force them to change all their procedures.
[01:56:11.220 --> 01:56:14.220]  That is really going to make them unhappy.
[01:56:14.220 --> 01:56:28.220]  But that's what they need to find out, is that the least likely person they pull over could be the one to drop the sky on them.
[01:56:28.220 --> 01:56:29.220]  That's what I've been doing.
[01:56:29.220 --> 01:56:31.220]  That's what Scott's been doing.
[01:56:31.220 --> 01:56:36.220]  And that's what you've been doing.
[01:56:36.220 --> 01:56:41.220]  You probably don't realize yet how much effect you're going to have.
[01:56:41.220 --> 01:56:45.220]  And you're likely to have a statewide effect.
[01:56:45.220 --> 01:56:51.220]  Because every judge in the state will know about what you're doing to them.
[01:56:51.220 --> 01:56:55.220]  They're going to know these guys in Jackson, Tennessee got this guy.
[01:56:55.220 --> 01:56:58.220]  Every time they step across the line, he sues them.
[01:56:58.220 --> 01:57:00.220]  He stings them.
[01:57:00.220 --> 01:57:02.220]  He's not filing frivolous suits.
[01:57:02.220 --> 01:57:06.220]  He's not filing a patriot mythology garbage.
[01:57:06.220 --> 01:57:11.220]  He has taken their law and taken them to town with it.
[01:57:11.220 --> 01:57:17.220]  This is probably their worst nightmare.
[01:57:17.220 --> 01:57:18.220]  Okay.
[01:57:18.220 --> 01:57:21.220]  So that means stay with my views.
[01:57:21.220 --> 01:57:23.220]  Listen to everybody else.
[01:57:23.220 --> 01:57:25.220]  Continue pressing the pressure that I want.
[01:57:25.220 --> 01:57:26.220]  Right?
[01:57:26.220 --> 01:57:27.220]  Yeah.
[01:57:27.220 --> 01:57:28.220]  Listen to me.
[01:57:28.220 --> 01:57:31.220]  Listen to everybody else.
[01:57:31.220 --> 01:57:34.220]  And you make your decision.
[01:57:34.220 --> 01:57:41.220]  Do not do what I tell you unless you are certain that it is right for you.
[01:57:41.220 --> 01:57:50.220]  One of the things that scares me about giving people suggestions of what to do, especially when they're talking about somebody's liberty.
[01:57:50.220 --> 01:57:52.220]  I'm always terrified about their liberty.
[01:57:52.220 --> 01:57:58.220]  Frankly, Olivia, for a while now, I was worried about you as concerned.
[01:57:58.220 --> 01:58:02.220]  But you got your way through it.
[01:58:02.220 --> 01:58:10.220]  Just from talking to you, you're hitting up a level with what I do.
[01:58:10.220 --> 01:58:13.220]  What kind of contemporaries are you?
[01:58:13.220 --> 01:58:20.220]  As far as I'm concerned, at this point, you certainly know Tennessee law way better than I do.
[01:58:20.220 --> 01:58:22.220]  Okay. Hang on.
[01:58:22.220 --> 01:58:24.220]  We're done for the night.
[01:58:24.220 --> 01:58:27.220]  Come back tomorrow night.
[01:58:27.220 --> 01:58:30.220]  Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, The Rule of Law Radio.
[01:58:30.220 --> 01:58:34.220]  We'll be back tomorrow night for our four-hour info marathon.
[01:58:34.220 --> 01:58:36.220]  Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:36.220 --> 01:58:50.220]  Good night.
[01:59:06.220 --> 01:59:08.220]  We'll be right back.
[01:59:36.220 --> 01:59:41.220]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.220 --> 01:59:45.220]  That's 888-551-0102.
[01:59:45.220 --> 01:59:52.220]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:52.220 --> 02:00:07.220]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.