[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.000 --> 00:28.000]  Markets for Wednesday, the 23rd of November, 2016, are currently trading with gold at $1,191.04 an ounce,
[00:28.000 --> 00:33.000]  silver at $16.39 an ounce, Texas crude at $48.03 a barrel,
[00:33.000 --> 00:43.000]  and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $741 U.S. currency.
[00:43.000 --> 00:49.000]  Today in history, the year 2003, the Rose Revolution, has its success with the Georgian
[00:49.000 --> 00:55.000]  president-elect, Edward Shevardnadze, resigning following weeks of mass protests over what
[00:55.000 --> 01:02.000]  protesters were calling flawed elections today in history.
[01:02.000 --> 01:07.000]  In recent news, this past Sunday night, 400 protesters had a violent confrontation with police,
[01:07.000 --> 01:12.000]  which led to the hospitalization of more than two dozen Dakota Access Pipeline protesters.
[01:12.000 --> 01:17.000]  Protesters have been seeking to stop the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline since last summer.
[01:17.000 --> 01:21.000]  One protestor, a 21-year-old New York resident named Sophia Wilansky,
[01:21.000 --> 01:24.000]  almost lost her arm after an explosion from a concussion grenade.
[01:24.000 --> 01:27.000]  She might need as many as 20 surgeries to repair her forearm,
[01:27.000 --> 01:33.000]  and her father told KFYR, a CNN affiliate, that amputation wouldn't be necessary
[01:33.000 --> 01:36.000]  even though the explosion blew the bone out of her arm.
[01:36.000 --> 01:40.000]  North Dakota State Patrol spokesman Lieutenant Tom Iverson stated to media sources
[01:40.000 --> 01:45.000]  that state troopers had not deployed a grenade or any other explosives against protesters on Sunday.
[01:45.000 --> 01:49.000]  However, there is video and pictures of police spraying water cannons at the protesters'
[01:49.000 --> 02:00.000]  and below-freezing temperatures, along with also shooting rubber bullets and tear gas into the crowd.
[02:00.000 --> 02:05.000]  A new bill in the Texas legislature would make it a hate crime to target police officers or first responders.
[02:05.000 --> 02:09.000]  The legislation was filed just one day after the San Antonio police officer was assassinated
[02:09.000 --> 02:12.000]  while he sat in his patrol car writing a ticket.
[02:12.000 --> 02:15.000]  If passed, the bill would become the first of its kind in the United States.
[02:15.000 --> 02:20.000]  According to KHOU, Texas Governor Greg Abbott called for a similar bill this July
[02:20.000 --> 02:24.000]  after five Dallas police officers were murdered in the streets during a protest.
[02:24.000 --> 02:35.000]  If passed, HB 429 would increase the penalty for attacking a cop, firefighter, or paramedic.
[02:35.000 --> 02:39.000]  And this Thanksgiving travel period is expected to be the busiest in almost a decade,
[02:39.000 --> 02:43.000]  with nearly 49 million people expected to travel 50 miles or more between Wednesday and Sunday.
[02:43.000 --> 02:47.000]  According to AAA, it is due to lower gas prices and an improving economy.
[02:47.000 --> 02:52.000]  One thing is for certain, avoiding war with Russia is definitely something to be thankful for.
[02:52.000 --> 02:54.000]  So happy Thanksgiving, y'all.
[02:54.000 --> 03:16.000]  This was Rick Roady, your lowdown for November 23rd, 2016.
[03:16.000 --> 03:24.000]  Really, man, come on, six o'clock news says somebody's been shot, somebody's been abused,
[03:24.000 --> 03:30.000]  somebody blew up a building, somebody stole their car, somebody got away,
[03:30.000 --> 03:39.000]  somebody didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far.
[03:39.000 --> 03:47.000]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day's time, a man had to answer for the weed that he'd done.
[03:47.000 --> 03:53.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them bad boys,
[03:53.000 --> 04:01.000]  hang them high on the street, where all the people would see.
[04:01.000 --> 04:07.000]  That justice is one thing you should always find, you gotta settle up your boys,
[04:07.000 --> 04:09.000]  you gotta draw a hard line.
[04:09.000 --> 04:13.000]  When the guns won't settle, we'll sing a victory tune,
[04:13.000 --> 04:17.000]  and we'll all be back at the local zoo.
[04:17.000 --> 04:22.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing,
[04:22.000 --> 04:33.000]  West kid for my men, bear for my horses.
[04:33.000 --> 04:38.000]  We ain't got too many gangsters doing dirty deeds,
[04:38.000 --> 04:41.000]  too much corruption and crime in the streets,
[04:41.000 --> 04:46.000]  and the long arm of the law, but a few more in the ground.
[04:46.000 --> 04:51.000]  I'm all to the maker and he'll settle on down.
[04:51.000 --> 04:57.000]  You can bet he'll settle down.
[04:57.000 --> 05:02.000]  Good evening, folks, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig.
[05:02.000 --> 05:05.000]  It is November 28, 2016.
[05:05.000 --> 05:07.000]  We are live tonight.
[05:07.000 --> 05:10.000]  And I'm sorry I let the bumper play a little bit long,
[05:10.000 --> 05:13.000]  but I wanted to get to that verse about setting them on down,
[05:13.000 --> 05:16.000]  because we've got to change something about what's going on in this country,
[05:16.000 --> 05:19.000]  and we've got to do it quickly.
[05:19.000 --> 05:27.000]  I've been doing some more legal research on case law today and yesterday and the day before and the day before that.
[05:27.000 --> 05:34.000]  And it seems like we have this problem with the Texas courts, every court really,
[05:34.000 --> 05:40.000]  but here in Texas you can statistically show this to be factual.
[05:40.000 --> 05:48.000]  The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is a criminal enterprise.
[05:48.000 --> 05:51.000]  No ifs, no ands, no buts.
[05:51.000 --> 05:59.000]  Not only does the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals have a disproportionate amount of rulings in favor of government
[05:59.000 --> 06:03.000]  when the law and the facts are clearly against the government,
[06:03.000 --> 06:19.000]  but they have knowingly and willingly put forth opinions that decree violations of law by prosecutors and courts is perfectly fine.
[06:19.000 --> 06:25.000]  Not just occasional ones, not just some, but some very specific things in law,
[06:25.000 --> 06:29.000]  such as our right to examining trial, which we've talked about before,
[06:29.000 --> 06:35.000]  that it's okay for the courts to just ignore the law and do what they want.
[06:35.000 --> 06:43.000]  Now of course this all goes back to that felony case that I was working on out toward the border country there on the west side of Texas,
[06:43.000 --> 06:49.000]  and all the things that are going on in that case, and some of the stuff they keep sending me to look at,
[06:49.000 --> 06:55.000]  which I'd already found I was reading before they sent it to me, but it worked out all the same anyway.
[06:55.000 --> 06:59.000]  Now I want to read you a quote by George Bernard Shaw.
[06:59.000 --> 07:03.000]  Power does not corrupt men.
[07:03.000 --> 07:11.000]  Fools, however, if they get into a position of power, corrupt power.
[07:11.000 --> 07:23.000]  Folks, there is no question that our judicial system, our government, is entirely populated by a majority of fools.
[07:23.000 --> 07:29.000]  Doesn't matter what label they attach to themselves, whether it be Democrat, Republican,
[07:29.000 --> 07:37.000]  because that is a label applicable in name only, not in fact or in act, okay?
[07:37.000 --> 07:45.000]  They will do whatever they see fit to further their own career, their own profit, their own power,
[07:45.000 --> 07:57.000]  and their own ability to stay in a freeloading job where they don't have to actually do anything to earn a living, except screw us over.
[07:57.000 --> 08:01.000]  We've got to change how this works.
[08:01.000 --> 08:07.000]  Now I do not pretend to be the oracle that has all the answers for everything.
[08:07.000 --> 08:17.000]  And yeah, I've got some ideas that wouldn't fly with a lot of people about how to fix this problem immediately.
[08:17.000 --> 08:27.000]  But be that as it may, the fact remains it affects us all to just ride the bench and watch it happen.
[08:27.000 --> 08:34.000]  Doesn't matter whether it's anything to do with the election. It doesn't matter whether it's anything to do with a local election.
[08:34.000 --> 08:38.000]  Doesn't have anything to do with your municipality, your county.
[08:38.000 --> 08:45.000]  They're screwing the people over left and right for their corporation, okay?
[08:45.000 --> 08:50.000]  You've got to remember, all municipalities, counties, and states are incorporated now.
[08:50.000 --> 08:58.000]  They think of themselves like a big corporate business. And their goal in any corporation is what?
[08:58.000 --> 09:06.000]  As a matter of law, the corporation is required to generate a profit unless it's not a nonprofit,
[09:06.000 --> 09:12.000]  which we know that that's not true for states and counties and municipalities. They're all for profit.
[09:12.000 --> 09:20.000]  So they treat everything as any other corporation would, that as long as it has the power to do something,
[09:20.000 --> 09:31.000]  the rest of the consequences be damned, as long as it is a positive effect on their bottom line.
[09:31.000 --> 09:42.000]  So we have gone from being the rule of law to the rule of everything but law under the form of corporate policy.
[09:42.000 --> 09:47.000]  And we have accepted it as if it's a viable thing.
[09:47.000 --> 09:52.000]  Now, no, I'm not going down the patronite road of everything's a corporation and all that kind of stuff,
[09:52.000 --> 10:00.000]  but this is just a legitimate fact that you can see if you look, that they are incorporated,
[10:00.000 --> 10:07.000]  that the reason they do most of the things they do is through the administrative policies that they use and call law,
[10:07.000 --> 10:12.000]  because most of the things the legislature enacts is not something the legislature wrote,
[10:12.000 --> 10:16.000]  nor is it something the legislature really has a clue about what's in it.
[10:16.000 --> 10:21.000]  How do we know? Because just like Obamacare and so many other things like the Patriot Act,
[10:21.000 --> 10:26.000]  they don't read this crap before they vote on it. How do we know that?
[10:26.000 --> 10:32.000]  Because they put a little clause in there that says, due to some ongoing public emergency or a crowded calendar,
[10:32.000 --> 10:39.000]  we declare an emergency so that we don't have to read this thing on three several days like we're supposed to.
[10:39.000 --> 10:44.000]  Now, that in and of itself is a violation of the Texas Constitution.
[10:44.000 --> 10:50.000]  They can't suspend the rules of procedure for enacting law just because they want to.
[10:50.000 --> 10:57.000]  But there is no question that the procedures used to make those laws is as unconstitutional
[10:57.000 --> 11:06.000]  as these idiots' ability to delegate it to these lower political subdivisions.
[11:06.000 --> 11:17.000]  Now, the part that I found an interesting white paper written by another idiot attorney wannabe lawyer
[11:17.000 --> 11:36.000]  to the thesis of this entire or the theme of this entire paper is the constitutional authority for aggressive police powers.
[11:36.000 --> 11:48.000]  Okay? Now, the premise of this white paper is that the Constitution supports police departments
[11:48.000 --> 11:59.000]  not only enforcing these policies at the local levels, but in killing people for even the most inane alleged defense
[11:59.000 --> 12:03.000]  because those people resisted the police power.
[12:03.000 --> 12:10.000]  Now, this idiot actually wrote this white paper saying that this is a constitutional authority given to these guys.
[12:10.000 --> 12:13.000]  That is absolutely BS.
[12:13.000 --> 12:18.000]  Historically speaking alone, it would be BS.
[12:18.000 --> 12:26.000]  Number one, these police departments did not exist in the form that they do now the way they did then.
[12:26.000 --> 12:36.000]  Second, these mal and prohibitive BS administrative laws that we have today did not exist then.
[12:36.000 --> 12:41.000]  They were in fact the bills of pains and penalties and the bills of attainders and everything else,
[12:41.000 --> 12:48.000]  the administrative stuff that was never supposed to be used against the people.
[12:48.000 --> 12:56.000]  So just on that basis alone, this white paper was authored by an idiot.
[12:56.000 --> 13:05.000]  Administrative law will be the end of the American dream and you have Roosevelt to thank for that.
[13:05.000 --> 13:16.000]  You have the progressives to thank for that because to them progress is only being made when they're profiting and you're not.
[13:16.000 --> 13:19.000]  They're in control and you're not.
[13:19.000 --> 13:23.000]  They have the power and you don't.
[13:23.000 --> 13:28.000]  That's what being a progressive is all about.
[13:28.000 --> 13:35.000]  Whenever I travel around Austin and I see these signs up for these idiots running for reelection,
[13:35.000 --> 13:41.000]  especially when it comes to judges and it says on the sign progressive Democrat,
[13:41.000 --> 13:49.000]  right there that should be the very first thing warning you away from ever voting for that individual
[13:49.000 --> 13:57.000]  because you do not fully understand what their meaning of progressive is.
[13:57.000 --> 14:05.000]  And if you ever bother to check their opinions and the way they've held office and the things they've said about being in office,
[14:05.000 --> 14:12.000]  you would very quickly learn that voting that person into office, especially in a position of a judge,
[14:12.000 --> 14:14.000]  would be the most idiotic thing you could imagine.
[14:14.000 --> 14:19.000]  It goes hand in hand with making Hillary Clinton president.
[14:19.000 --> 14:27.000]  But we have an awful lot of that going around in this country where stupid people are doing stupid things and calling it right.
[14:27.000 --> 14:31.000]  And the rest of us are standing around twiddling our thumbs going, yeah, yeah, if you say so,
[14:31.000 --> 14:38.000]  it doesn't bother me today, but wait until tomorrow when it really trickles down and has a bigger impact.
[14:38.000 --> 14:41.000]  Why?
[14:41.000 --> 14:47.000]  You know, when we had GIs fighting in Vietnam in World War I and World War II,
[14:47.000 --> 14:50.000]  one thing I guarantee you, you did not see them do.
[14:50.000 --> 14:54.000]  Now, we all know the old adage, of course, of crap rolls downhill, right?
[14:54.000 --> 14:57.000]  Well, the same thing is true of hand grenades.
[14:57.000 --> 15:03.000]  And I guarantee you, you didn't see any of the soldiers trying to get up that hill
[15:03.000 --> 15:10.000]  that could see a hand grenade coming at them that decided to stay where they are to see where it hit,
[15:10.000 --> 15:17.000]  to see whether or not it exploded in their vicinity and actually had an impact on them.
[15:17.000 --> 15:24.000]  No, they got the hell out of the way, if they could, and then they tried to get rid of the one that threw it,
[15:24.000 --> 15:27.000]  so they couldn't throw anymore.
[15:27.000 --> 15:31.000]  But then again, fighting a war seems to be a lot more common sense aspect of survival
[15:31.000 --> 15:37.000]  than just the political aspect of survival in this country anymore, because common sense doesn't exist here.
[15:37.000 --> 15:39.000]  Common sense is an anachronism.
[15:39.000 --> 15:45.000]  It's no longer a valid concept for 99% of the people.
[15:45.000 --> 15:51.000]  It's as common as hen's teeth, as the saying would go.
[15:51.000 --> 16:03.000]  We have allowed ourselves to become so politically correct that we cannot seek out the truth of what's being done
[16:03.000 --> 16:07.000]  and rail against it and speak out against it and act against it.
[16:07.000 --> 16:12.000]  Right now, as the advertisement, the voiceover before the show began,
[16:12.000 --> 16:19.000]  we've got a bill going through the legislature here in Texas for hate crimes if you attack a police officer.
[16:19.000 --> 16:24.000]  Now, it's already bad enough that when the officer commits aggravated assault,
[16:24.000 --> 16:29.000]  you cannot fight back to protect yourself when they are escalating the use of force
[16:29.000 --> 16:35.000]  well above any level of force necessary to make an arrest or anything else.
[16:35.000 --> 16:41.000]  And yet, you do anything to defend yourself, you're going to get charged with felony assault of a police officer.
[16:41.000 --> 16:45.000]  And now they want to turn it into a federal hate crime, too.
[16:45.000 --> 16:48.000]  Are you people listening?
[16:48.000 --> 16:52.000]  Do you understand what that's going to do?
[16:52.000 --> 17:19.000]  Hang on folks, we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang on there.
[17:23.000 --> 17:27.000]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:27.000 --> 17:33.000]  I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:33.000 --> 17:34.000]  Bye bye, yucky cookies.
[17:34.000 --> 17:42.000]  Now, I go to logosradio.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side, bookmark the link,
[17:42.000 --> 17:47.000]  and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies.
[17:47.000 --> 17:49.000]  New cookies for me?
[17:49.000 --> 17:53.000]  Consider it an early Christmas present, and every time I order on Amazon,
[17:53.000 --> 17:57.000]  I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network, too.
[17:57.000 --> 17:58.000]  C is for cookie.
[17:58.000 --> 18:00.000]  C is for classified.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:50.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:01.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the logosradio network dot com.
[19:31.000 --> 19:44.000]  All right, folks.
[19:44.000 --> 19:45.000]  We are back.
[19:45.000 --> 19:47.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and that is correct.
[19:47.000 --> 19:54.000]  We are slipping into the twilight zone, and we do it more and more every single day with our apathy and ignorance.
[19:54.000 --> 20:00.000]  Now, folks, the phones are on 512-646-1984 if you want to call in.
[20:00.000 --> 20:08.000]  But while I'm going through this, there's something else that you might need to understand when it comes to all of these corrupt policies
[20:08.000 --> 20:19.000]  and corporate themes that are going through our system of government for their profit at our loss and their control at our expense.
[20:19.000 --> 20:28.000]  When it comes to any of these government programs for, like, public safety, like, let's look at all the huge DPS buildup on the border that we had.
[20:28.000 --> 20:35.000]  Yet the DPS statistics are being lied about.
[20:35.000 --> 20:48.000]  There's no other way to put it, because they are putting things into the statistics about the border buildup that have nothing to do with the border, nothing.
[20:48.000 --> 20:59.000]  And while the harassment of the general public along the border area has gone up over 500 percent,
[20:59.000 --> 21:22.000]  they have done virtually nothing to stop illegal entry, drugs entry, or any of the other things that they're alleging as the basis and the need for a $778 million a year budget for the DPS.
[21:22.000 --> 21:40.000]  Now think about that. The head of the Department of Public Safety is the one that is making sure that these reports contain numbers that will keep his organization in the money.
[21:40.000 --> 21:52.000]  I believe it's Crawford is his name. But they're lies. They're complete and total lies.
[21:52.000 --> 22:01.000]  They have a statistic that they call something to do with serious crime, I think is what I read about it today.
[22:01.000 --> 22:20.000]  And yet within those statistics, they have traffic stops. They have less than a quarter gram possession charges for people that are Americans, not illegals.
[22:20.000 --> 22:33.000]  And just thousands upon thousands of traffic warning citations are in this violent crime statistic that they're using.
[22:33.000 --> 22:45.000]  It's padded. It's made up to justify this humongous budget DPS sucks out of the people of Texas every single year.
[22:45.000 --> 22:55.000]  Now like every agency in Texas, DPS has a sunset provision. Every agency in Texas has a sunset provision written in the law.
[22:55.000 --> 23:07.000]  But regardless of their inefficiency, regardless of their necessity, regardless of their cost benefit analysis and ratio, they're always brought back.
[23:07.000 --> 23:16.000]  Very rarely do we retire an agency with the Sunset Act despite how ludicrous it is to maintain them.
[23:16.000 --> 23:28.000]  But then again, when they can tap into our pockets and our property anytime they want to for any amount of money they want to, what would they care?
[23:28.000 --> 23:48.000]  And yet we keep putting people up here that don't work for us, never have, never will, that all seek to get office solely so they can benefit from it before they get back out of office, should they ever get back out of office.
[23:48.000 --> 23:54.000]  How do you think the attorneys got control of everything back in 1939?
[23:54.000 --> 24:04.000]  Now when it comes to these policies and things that are made up, there's a very good quote by I think Ludwig von Mises,
[24:04.000 --> 24:12.000]  one of the greatest mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.
[24:12.000 --> 24:21.000]  And when you look at the results of most of these programs that we have that are eating up the people's money, they're not worth it.
[24:21.000 --> 24:25.000]  Not even close.
[24:25.000 --> 24:38.000]  We have all these things taking away from our livelihood that we don't want, we don't need, and are actually used to steal even more from us.
[24:38.000 --> 24:49.000]  Let's take another example of DPS and the use of the transportation code in an unconstitutional fashion just as an example.
[24:49.000 --> 25:01.000]  You get pulled over for some alleged offense under the transportation code, an offense that in some instances doesn't even exist in the code like speeding, okay?
[25:01.000 --> 25:06.000]  There is no speeding offense in Texas, there has never been a speeding offense in Texas.
[25:06.000 --> 25:22.000]  But the judges and the prosecutors create one by legislating from the bench and facilitating an act that is not codified anywhere, okay?
[25:22.000 --> 25:37.000]  They create an offense, then they set the parameters that are not even consistent with what is discussed in the statute as to how you commit the offense and can be convicted of said offense.
[25:37.000 --> 25:47.000]  There's not a more clear abuse of judicial power than a speeding citation and how it's done, okay?
[25:47.000 --> 25:52.000]  No clearer abuse than that.
[25:52.000 --> 26:09.000]  But other charges within the transportation code such as proof of financial responsibility or driving while license invalid, for instance, which also, by the way, don't have all the elements ever proven in those cases.
[26:09.000 --> 26:26.000]  And the one with financial responsibility is actually unconstitutional in the sense that it shifts the burden of proof to the back of the accused and it presumes guilt over innocence and it's written directly into the statute that way, that you are presumed guilty.
[26:26.000 --> 26:30.000]  You shall be presumed to have violated the statute.
[26:30.000 --> 26:39.000]  Not that you're innocent of the violation, but you shall be presumed to have violated the statute.
[26:39.000 --> 26:58.000]  Now, in those two types of charges, you go to court and even if you haven't yet gone to trial, the moment the citation goes into the court, a 30-day clock starts.
[26:58.000 --> 27:10.000]  On day 31, that court sends a notice to the Department of Public Safety that you have a charge pending against you for one of those two offenses or both of them.
[27:10.000 --> 27:39.000]  The DPS then, without any conviction, without any adjudication, now prevents you from renewing your registration and your license and assesses a surcharge each year for the next three years in some amount of dollars depending upon what number this is in the sequence of offenses you've committed.
[27:39.000 --> 27:44.000]  Is this your first offense in this category or your second or your third?
[27:44.000 --> 27:49.000]  So you are assessed an administrative penalty, okay?
[27:49.000 --> 28:06.000]  They call it a fee, but it's a penalty that is never adjudicated and it is done entirely by an administrative agency with zero judicial review, okay?
[28:06.000 --> 28:14.000]  That, by definition, is an unconstitutional bill of pains and penalties.
[28:14.000 --> 28:17.000]  A jury does not levy those fees.
[28:17.000 --> 28:23.000]  A jury is never even made aware that those fees are a consequence of you being found guilty.
[28:23.000 --> 28:25.000]  Hell, you don't even have to be found guilty.
[28:25.000 --> 28:31.000]  They've already done it on a 30-day clock, even if you haven't been convicted.
[28:31.000 --> 28:43.000]  And then you will play hell getting that removed and reversed in the Department of Public Safety even if you win.
[28:43.000 --> 28:45.000]  Now think about that.
[28:45.000 --> 28:55.000]  You have an administrative agency of the state acting unilaterally to punish you monetarily for an offense for which you have not even been convicted.
[28:55.000 --> 29:04.000]  And even if you have been convicted, they are doing it in a manner that is outside of the justice system in a way that you cannot appeal it,
[29:04.000 --> 29:17.000]  in a way that you cannot challenge it, and in a way where that penalty is never directly assessed by anyone other than that administrative agency.
[29:17.000 --> 29:22.000]  It is the absolute epitome of unconstitutional.
[29:22.000 --> 29:28.000]  Yet we make these constitutional challenges to these cases, and who are we going to have to take them before?
[29:28.000 --> 29:47.000]  The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, who has a hugely disproportionate decision set in favor of government over the rights of the people and the actual law or statutes in this case.
[29:47.000 --> 29:56.000]  What we may have to do is look to show a vote of no confidence in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals judges and get them all removed from the case.
[29:56.000 --> 30:02.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after the break. Y'all hang in there.
[30:02.000 --> 30:04.000]  Hey, what's that smell?
[30:04.000 --> 30:08.000]  In the not-too-distant future, you might actually reply, that's my perfume pill.
[30:08.000 --> 30:13.000]  Yes, pills, not spray bottles, may soon be the way we apply scent in the future.
[30:13.000 --> 30:17.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll have details in a moment.
[30:17.000 --> 30:22.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:33.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:33.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:42.000]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:45.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:45.000 --> 30:50.000]  When I see someone covered in sweat, I do my nose a favor and steer clear.
[30:50.000 --> 30:55.000]  But someday, sniffing someone's sweat might be as sweet as a spritz of cologne.
[30:55.000 --> 30:58.000]  That is if Lucy McRae's invention pans out.
[30:58.000 --> 31:06.000]  McRae, a 31-year-old artist, is working with Dutch chemists on a pill you could swallow to turn your perspiration into cologne.
[31:06.000 --> 31:09.000]  Packing beauty products into pills isn't new.
[31:09.000 --> 31:15.000]  Some pills provide sun protection, and L'Oreal is working on a supplement to keep your hair from turning gray.
[31:15.000 --> 31:20.000]  McRae says her perfume pill will smell unique on each individual who uses it.
[31:20.000 --> 31:25.000]  But internal perfume? Hmm. I'm not sure that idea passes my sniff test.
[31:25.000 --> 31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.000 --> 31:35.000]  What are you thinking? Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics?
[31:35.000 --> 31:42.000]  For a total body detox for around $10 a month, mqsa.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder
[31:42.000 --> 31:49.000]  for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever.
[31:49.000 --> 31:53.000]  It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products.
[31:53.000 --> 31:58.000]  That saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367.
[31:58.000 --> 32:01.000]  Only at mqsa.org.
[32:01.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:11.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[32:11.000 --> 32:14.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:14.000 --> 32:18.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:18.000 --> 32:21.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:21.000 --> 32:26.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:32.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.000 --> 32:36.000]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:46.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:51.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:00.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:25.000 --> 33:30.000]  This is what happens when you call them the cops This is what happens when you call them the cops
[33:30.000 --> 33:35.000]  This is what happens when you call them the cops You get your rights violated or you all get shot
[33:35.000 --> 33:40.000]  I think of people being victimized by criminal cops Psychopathic predators terrorize the neighborhood block
[33:40.000 --> 33:45.000]  Dequip with pepper spray, mate, cuffs, gazes and glocks They like serial killers acting out subliminal thoughts
[33:45.000 --> 33:48.000]  Forget what you taught These cops have got a license to kill
[33:48.000 --> 33:53.000]  Witness intimidation means that they can use it at will Code of silence means that the pits will never let out a squill
[33:53.000 --> 33:57.000]  And if they go to court they know that you can't make me feel real That's why they stoppin' me
[33:57.000 --> 34:03.000]  Now that song right there, I'm thinking of making that the new intro song to the show, obviously
[34:03.000 --> 34:08.000]  And it's a lot more accurate than most people would care to admit
[34:08.000 --> 34:13.000]  If you haven't heard that song, you really need to go listen to that song
[34:13.000 --> 34:21.000]  I know it's in a delivery method that most people in Texas especially may not exactly like
[34:21.000 --> 34:29.000]  Being a rap type song and everything But don't listen to so much of the music as you do to the words they're saying
[34:29.000 --> 34:40.000]  The words are dead on It is probably the most accurate song in existence today
[34:40.000 --> 34:45.000]  When it comes to the state of affairs and dealing with police officers
[34:45.000 --> 34:54.000]  Now, right here in my own neighborhood in the last two or three weeks, just a couple weeks ago
[34:54.000 --> 35:01.000]  We had a dog attack A dog attacked a little girl and a family here
[35:01.000 --> 35:07.000]  It was one of two pit bulls that lived in the house with them that they've had since they were about four or five months old
[35:07.000 --> 35:15.000]  And he hurt the little girl, not seriously bad as in life threatening or anything
[35:15.000 --> 35:18.000]  But bad enough that it could have been a whole lot worse
[35:18.000 --> 35:24.000]  And then when they finally managed to get some help to the house
[35:24.000 --> 35:29.000]  The police showed up, Austin PD, and tried to shoot the dog
[35:29.000 --> 35:37.000]  Now, as the story goes, the Austin officer that was shooting at the dog shot fairly wildly
[35:37.000 --> 35:44.000]  Because not only were there shell casings all over the street at the intersection just up from where I live here
[35:44.000 --> 35:50.000]  They apparently broke into one of the neighbor's houses through the fence into the backyard and into the house
[35:50.000 --> 35:56.000]  Because they thought that one of their bullets had strayed through the fence in the wall and killed the person inside
[35:56.000 --> 36:01.000]  Or potentially killed the person inside, my neighbor
[36:01.000 --> 36:03.000]  That's how wildly they were shooting
[36:03.000 --> 36:14.000]  But in a slight bit of irony, one of the bullets ricocheted off of something and shot the other cop instead
[36:14.000 --> 36:21.000]  Now, he managed to hit the dog, but the problem is the dog was rushing at the little girl again
[36:21.000 --> 36:30.000]  And the story is accurate the way it was given to me at the time the cop was shooting at the dog
[36:30.000 --> 36:39.000]  Now, I don't know what it is with Austin PD and its cowboy on horseback use of weapons when it comes to this stuff
[36:39.000 --> 36:46.000]  But what the hell are you thinking?
[36:46.000 --> 36:55.000]  Are you such a gutless wonder in a badge and uniform that you would risk everyone else's life
[36:55.000 --> 37:02.000]  Rather than keep that gun holstered and grab that dog by the collar on his neck
[37:02.000 --> 37:09.000]  He was wearing one, he was close enough to grab
[37:09.000 --> 37:18.000]  I've had hands on with this dog before, he can be controlled, you just have to be smarter than he is
[37:18.000 --> 37:26.000]  But we wound up with bullet holes in neighbor's houses and one other cop before it was all said and done
[37:26.000 --> 37:35.000]  And they shut down that entire street and three or four houses all around it for the next eight hours
[37:35.000 --> 37:40.000]  You understand? Eight hours
[37:40.000 --> 37:46.000]  It was ridiculous and I was sitting down here working when I heard the gun go off
[37:46.000 --> 37:51.000]  But from where I was sitting, it sounded like somebody had set off a string of firecrackers
[37:51.000 --> 37:54.000]  Didn't sound like somebody was shooting a gun
[37:54.000 --> 38:02.000]  That's how haphazardly this guy was discharging his pistol
[38:02.000 --> 38:09.000]  And I accidentally bumped into the guy that was on the scene when all this went down
[38:09.000 --> 38:16.000]  Because he was the first person that was walking by when one of the children after the dog attack ran out trying to get help
[38:16.000 --> 38:19.000]  Because the two kids were home alone
[38:19.000 --> 38:24.000]  And I'm not knocking that, they're both old enough that it's okay for them to be there alone
[38:24.000 --> 38:29.000]  But they're small enough that this dog could have been a problem for either one of them by themselves
[38:29.000 --> 38:35.000]  Fortunately, the other pit bull, the female, attacked the male long enough to get him off of the little girl
[38:35.000 --> 38:38.000]  So she could lock herself in the bathroom and get away from him
[38:38.000 --> 38:40.000]  The little boy ran out to get help
[38:40.000 --> 38:44.000]  This guy's the one he found walking by at the time
[38:44.000 --> 38:46.000]  This guy's the one that called the cops
[38:46.000 --> 38:55.000]  This guy's the one that went in the house and got the little girl out of the bathroom and out of the house away from the dog
[38:55.000 --> 39:04.000]  And who was there when the dog was out running around in circles out there in the front of the house just doing what he does when the cops arrived
[39:04.000 --> 39:08.000]  And he said that cop unloaded his pistol
[39:08.000 --> 39:15.000]  The story is he only shot three times, but the guy that was present said, no, he unloaded that thing
[39:15.000 --> 39:24.000]  Which is consistent with the report that I heard from down here that sounded like a string of firecrackers
[39:24.000 --> 39:31.000]  So they're going to spin it to make themselves look less ignorant every time they get a chance
[39:31.000 --> 39:43.000]  Because if he unloaded a pistol in the neighborhood in the close proximity of these houses, there's no telling what he actually hit
[39:43.000 --> 39:51.000]  So that song that you're listening to, the words in it
[39:51.000 --> 40:02.000]  Why is it that Austin cops can only hit what they're aiming at and kill it when it's a human being?
[40:02.000 --> 40:08.000]  Because they didn't kill the dog. They shot him, but they didn't kill him
[40:08.000 --> 40:11.000]  How's that? Whole clip of bullets, didn't kill the dog
[40:11.000 --> 40:21.000]  Down here in Austin, we've got a cop who while holding a horse 100 yards plus away from a suspect shooting up the federal courthouse with a single bullet from a handgun
[40:21.000 --> 40:26.000]  Shoots it all the way that distance and kills the guy with one shot
[40:26.000 --> 40:32.000]  We have a police detective who manages to kill people by shooting them in the back of the head
[40:32.000 --> 40:41.000]  Only when it's a human being does Austin PD have the capability of killing with a single bullet
[40:41.000 --> 40:43.000]  It's astounding
[40:43.000 --> 40:59.000]  And then they wonder why a bill like what they're putting through for this hate crime against cops if you do something to injure an officer is so ridiculous
[40:59.000 --> 41:13.000]  This is a special law to give special privileges to an already over specialized as far as favoritism and ability to hide behind the law group of people
[41:13.000 --> 41:24.000]  And make it even more egregious in how they can treat the rest of us and be protected in that treatment
[41:24.000 --> 41:29.000]  If you let them pass this bill, we are so freaking done
[41:29.000 --> 41:32.000]  We are so done
[41:32.000 --> 41:42.000]  There will be nothing these cops cannot do to the people that will be held in an accountable fashion anymore
[41:42.000 --> 41:45.000]  Nothing
[41:45.000 --> 41:49.000]  All right, enough of that. Let's see who we got on the line here
[41:49.000 --> 41:54.000]  All right, we have John in Texas. John, what can we do for you?
[41:54.000 --> 41:59.000]  Hey, I was calling about an examining trial, but real quick, I was just going to tell you
[41:59.000 --> 42:06.000]  I am one of those people that has had a hold place on his license for no reason while waiting on a trial to happen
[42:06.000 --> 42:13.000]  And it's not so easy to get that taken off, but I'll just be your witness on that. That's actually happened
[42:13.000 --> 42:21.000]  But what I wanted to ask you about was, I'm trying to get an examining trial
[42:21.000 --> 42:25.000]  Do I need to send them something or should I wait until they have the arraignment?
[42:25.000 --> 42:29.000]  No, you need to file a demand for an examining trial immediately
[42:29.000 --> 42:34.000]  Now the thing is, if this is a misdemeanor, oh, and this is something else
[42:34.000 --> 42:39.000]  From now on, folks, what is the charge, John?
[42:39.000 --> 42:40.000]  Speeding
[42:40.000 --> 42:52.000]  Okay, from now on, always allege that this seizure was a warrantless seizure and arrest, okay?
[42:52.000 --> 42:55.000]  Always allege that in your pleadings
[42:55.000 --> 43:01.000]  That forces the burden of proof onto the state to prove that the stop itself was legitimate
[43:01.000 --> 43:04.000]  Before they even get to the facts of the case
[43:04.000 --> 43:05.000]  All right
[43:05.000 --> 43:11.000]  So when you file your demand, hang on, when you file your demand for that examining trial
[43:11.000 --> 43:16.000]  Make darn sure that you state in there that you have a right to that trial to determine the legality
[43:16.000 --> 43:22.000]  And constitutionality of this warrantless arrest and seizure
[43:22.000 --> 43:30.000]  Okay, all right, so just on a trial de novo, it'd be the same thing like starting right over, right?
[43:30.000 --> 43:32.000]  So I can just send it in and demand it?
[43:32.000 --> 43:36.000]  Well, there's a yes and no caveat to a trial de novo
[43:36.000 --> 43:41.000]  Hang on just a second, I'll get into that a little bit when we get back on the other side of this break, okay?
[43:41.000 --> 43:42.000]  All right
[43:42.000 --> 43:49.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984
[43:49.000 --> 43:53.000]  Give us a call, get in line, let's talk, we'll be right back
[43:53.000 --> 43:57.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[43:57.000 --> 44:01.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary
[44:01.000 --> 44:08.000]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step
[44:08.000 --> 44:12.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[44:12.000 --> 44:16.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[44:16.000 --> 44:23.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience
[44:28.000 --> 44:33.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:33.000 --> 44:37.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[44:37.000 --> 44:41.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, and video course
[44:41.000 --> 44:47.000]  Tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more
[44:47.000 --> 44:55.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ
[44:58.000 --> 45:02.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com
[45:02.000 --> 45:06.000]  And I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalajara
[45:06.000 --> 45:11.000]  Street, Suite D, here in Austin, Texas, on Brave New Books and Chase Bay
[45:11.000 --> 45:15.000]  To see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine
[45:19.000 --> 45:22.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including
[45:22.000 --> 45:27.000]  our Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold
[45:27.000 --> 45:34.000]  Call 512-264-4043, or find us on our website at www.ncdc.gov
[45:34.000 --> 45:38.000]  512-264-4043, or find us online at www.naturespureorganics.com
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com
[45:44.000 --> 45:48.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products
[45:48.000 --> 46:04.000]  naturespureorganics.com
[46:18.000 --> 46:22.000]  Did you read the news today?
[46:22.000 --> 46:26.000]  They say the danger's gone our way
[46:26.000 --> 46:31.000]  But I can see the fire still lights
[46:31.000 --> 46:34.000]  Burning into the night
[46:34.000 --> 46:38.000]  There's too many men, too many people
[46:38.000 --> 46:41.000]  Making too many problems
[46:41.000 --> 46:45.000]  And I'm not allowed to go around
[46:45.000 --> 46:51.000]  I see this in the land of confusion
[46:51.000 --> 46:55.000]  For this is the world we live in
[46:55.000 --> 46:58.000]  Absolutely right, this is the land of confusion
[46:58.000 --> 47:03.000]  We can't get our head over our butts long enough to see the sun setting on the horizon
[47:03.000 --> 47:08.000]  And on America itself, if we don't wake up
[47:08.000 --> 47:11.000]  Alright, back to John here
[47:11.000 --> 47:18.000]  Alright, John, in the case of a trial de novo, we've got several problems that no one discusses, but they exist
[47:18.000 --> 47:21.000]  First one begins with the actual trial court
[47:21.000 --> 47:25.000]  The trial de novo court is not the court of original jurisdiction
[47:25.000 --> 47:32.000]  In fact, it lacks any and all jurisdiction if the original trial court never had jurisdiction
[47:32.000 --> 47:46.000]  Okay? So the allegation here being that the trial court violated your rights so many different ways that they lost jurisdiction of the case
[47:46.000 --> 47:51.000]  There's no way that you could have gotten convicted if there had been a proper record to prove what they did
[47:51.000 --> 47:58.000]  Okay? Now those are due process violations that in a court of no record
[47:58.000 --> 48:03.000]  Never see the light of day and get addressed in the trial de novo
[48:03.000 --> 48:08.000]  Because the trial de novo court treats that as if it never happened
[48:08.000 --> 48:15.000]  Even though they could never have touched the case if it didn't happen
[48:15.000 --> 48:19.000]  You see the problem that's developing here?
[48:19.000 --> 48:20.000]  Yeah
[48:20.000 --> 48:21.000]  Okay?
[48:21.000 --> 48:22.000]  I don't know how to get around it, but
[48:22.000 --> 48:23.000]  Neither do they
[48:23.000 --> 48:29.000]  That's the problem, but no one has ever raised it
[48:29.000 --> 48:33.000]  That's another problem
[48:33.000 --> 48:39.000]  See, the fact is that county court is not the court of original jurisdiction
[48:39.000 --> 48:50.000]  But unless you documented the violations either through affidavits or through transcriptions of the case yourself, if it was a court of no record
[48:50.000 --> 48:56.000]  Then you have nothing to take to that court to get it, the case dismissed
[48:56.000 --> 49:04.000]  So the only thing you can do is from the, excuse me, from the original trial court is to have filed your motion for new trial
[49:04.000 --> 49:10.000]  Setting forth all of the legal reasons why you're entitled to a new trial
[49:10.000 --> 49:20.000]  An affidavit that certifies that these violations occurred through the course of the proceedings that would have deprived the court of jurisdiction of the cause in the first instance
[49:20.000 --> 49:25.000]  And thus deprived the de novo court of jurisdiction in the first instance
[49:25.000 --> 49:30.000]  And so on and so on and put all those into the record as you go
[49:30.000 --> 49:36.000]  This is an issue that the courts of Texas have never ever addressed
[49:36.000 --> 49:39.000]  Never
[49:39.000 --> 49:46.000]  So would I send that, so that, would I send that to the original court, the one with no record?
[49:46.000 --> 49:49.000]  And tell them, tell them they never had your
[49:49.000 --> 49:54.000]  When did you, no, when did you have, when was the judgment entered?
[49:54.000 --> 49:57.000]  On the third of this month
[49:57.000 --> 50:05.000]  Okay, you've only got five days in a court of no record to file your motion for new trial
[50:05.000 --> 50:13.000]  I've already done that and they've already, I've already paid the appeal bond and everything, so it's supposed to be coming up
[50:13.000 --> 50:16.000]  A hearing on it or the de novo?
[50:16.000 --> 50:20.000]  No, the de novo, they just haven't sent me anything in the mail to tell me
[50:20.000 --> 50:25.000]  Okay, then keep pounding on those same issues that you set forth in your motion for new trial
[50:25.000 --> 50:30.000]  The de novo court's going to look at you and go, we don't care, we don't care what happened down there
[50:30.000 --> 50:34.000]  And you need to make a record that that's exactly what they're saying
[50:34.000 --> 50:40.000]  See this, there is no question this is a due process violation of the most egregious nature
[50:40.000 --> 50:47.000]  Because what they're doing is they can violate your rights any way they want at the original trial level
[50:47.000 --> 50:52.000]  And now there's a judgment against you, okay?
[50:52.000 --> 50:56.000]  That you have to overcome in the de novo court
[50:56.000 --> 51:02.000]  It's not like when the de novo court says we don't care what happened, that didn't happen as far as we're concerned
[51:02.000 --> 51:07.000]  Well, it damn well did because if you didn't go to that court and get a new trial
[51:07.000 --> 51:14.000]  And if they find against you, that judge was still going to stand
[51:14.000 --> 51:17.000]  Exactly, exactly
[51:17.000 --> 51:21.000]  So what would be, should I put some case law in there or what should I?
[51:21.000 --> 51:27.000]  Well, the problem you have is depending upon what you're arguing for the case law to support
[51:27.000 --> 51:30.000]  Because there is no case law supporting this argument
[51:30.000 --> 51:35.000]  This argument has never been made
[51:35.000 --> 51:36.000]  Okay
[51:36.000 --> 51:42.000]  At least not in a way that I can find and not in a way that they've talked about or recognized
[51:42.000 --> 51:46.000]  My argument was no subject matter jurisdiction
[51:46.000 --> 51:52.000]  That wasn't in the, I brought that up in the first trial
[51:52.000 --> 52:00.000]  Which, you know, they threw a huge fit and I've had to make a, I've made a complaint on the lawyer at the bar
[52:00.000 --> 52:06.000]  So I'm probably going to be making a judicial misconduct complaint on the judge as well
[52:06.000 --> 52:07.000]  Yeah
[52:07.000 --> 52:15.000]  But I just, I don't know, like to send the trial, I was trying to see if, I'm guessing they probably won't dismiss it
[52:15.000 --> 52:19.000]  But I was thinking I should send them my objection to the proceedings going any further
[52:19.000 --> 52:20.000]  Absolutely
[52:20.000 --> 52:22.000]  They never had subject matter jurisdiction
[52:22.000 --> 52:25.000]  And they never proved it in the record
[52:25.000 --> 52:26.000]  Okay
[52:26.000 --> 52:31.000]  Now here's the other thing, they also, the problem is whether or not you alleged it
[52:31.000 --> 52:34.000]  And if you did allege it, how would you prove it?
[52:34.000 --> 52:38.000]  That's the problem, see, this is where the affidavit parts come in so much
[52:38.000 --> 52:46.000]  But you have to allege that the state never shouldered its burden to prove that the warrantless arrest was valid
[52:46.000 --> 52:50.000]  Constitutionally speaking
[52:50.000 --> 52:56.000]  Now there's a case here in Texas, it's called Ford v. State
[52:56.000 --> 53:02.000]  Let me get that here
[53:02.000 --> 53:12.000]  Ford v. State, 158 SW, 3rd, 488, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals from 2005
[53:12.000 --> 53:23.000]  They'll tell you very clearly that when you allege that the arrest that occurred, the seizure that occurred was without a warrant
[53:23.000 --> 53:33.000]  That's all you have to do, that's just the burden to prove to the state to prove that the initial seizure and arrest was constitutionally valid
[53:33.000 --> 53:40.000]  They don't ever prove that, they never mention that
[53:40.000 --> 53:41.000]  Exactly
[53:41.000 --> 53:48.000]  Now that would deprive the de novo court of jurisdiction right off the bat
[53:48.000 --> 53:56.000]  Okay, all right, so I guess my best, my first thing to do is send it straight to the de novo judge
[53:56.000 --> 53:59.000]  Correct, there's nothing else to file in the trial court
[53:59.000 --> 54:09.000]  If you've already filed a notice of appeal and your motion for new trial and got the appeal bond in, there's nothing else the trial court can do without a ruling from the de novo court
[54:09.000 --> 54:16.000]  Okay, all right, so that's what I'll do then, that'll work
[54:16.000 --> 54:19.000]  I think that's all I got, that's all I was going to say
[54:19.000 --> 54:29.000]  Other than that, I was going to say, I know two weeks ago you said you wanted, you would like for people to send in 20 bucks out of their case, but I'll send you the whole thing whenever I win
[54:29.000 --> 54:31.000]  That would be great, thanks
[54:31.000 --> 54:38.000]  I hope everybody else will do that too, because this is not about the money, this is about doing what's right
[54:38.000 --> 54:41.000]  Yeah, and stopping the theft
[54:41.000 --> 54:44.000]  Yeah, exactly
[54:44.000 --> 54:46.000]  All right, well thanks John
[54:46.000 --> 54:47.000]  I appreciate it
[54:47.000 --> 54:48.000]  All right, thank you
[54:48.000 --> 54:49.000]  Bye bye
[54:49.000 --> 54:59.000]  All right, now we have Robert in California, Robert, what can we do for you?
[54:59.000 --> 55:04.000]  Hey Robert
[55:04.000 --> 55:11.000]  All right, let's try this again
[55:11.000 --> 55:18.000]  There you are, okay, yeah, I'm sorry, my webpage here with the caller board keeps shifting in and out and it keeps clicking the wrong mute
[55:18.000 --> 55:21.000]  All right, go ahead Robert, I'm sorry
[55:21.000 --> 55:26.000]  This is that brake light case I told you about, I don't know if you remember or not, in California
[55:26.000 --> 55:34.000]  The officers stopped me and reported that my brake lights were out, my right brake light, and they worked just fine, there's nothing wrong with it
[55:34.000 --> 55:35.000]  Right
[55:35.000 --> 55:36.000]  I've tried to sub-
[55:36.000 --> 55:37.000]  Subpoena?
[55:37.000 --> 55:45.000]  Evidence through the liaison officer and they're right, you know, running a red chart or, you know, interference
[55:45.000 --> 55:54.000]  Okay, well you can still file a subpoena due to Stecum and demand that the officer show up with the video from his cruiser
[55:54.000 --> 55:58.000]  And any other records relevant to that that you intend to use against him in court
[55:58.000 --> 56:07.000]  But, that's it, now you said you did a subpoena, did you file a motion for discovery?
[56:07.000 --> 56:11.000]  Yeah, that's what I have to hand in to the police station
[56:11.000 --> 56:19.000]  No, no, why would you file a motion for discovery in a police station?
[56:19.000 --> 56:22.000]  Well, for the due to Stecum and the sub-PP10, I was told-
[56:22.000 --> 56:32.000]  No, you start with the court, you file the motion for discovery with the court, you get the court to sign off on that discovery
[56:32.000 --> 56:39.000]  You take that order to the department and say, give me what this judge said, give me
[56:39.000 --> 56:48.000]  Okay, the subpoena due to Stecum must also start with the court
[56:48.000 --> 56:54.000]  They'll have a little form for the subpoena that they're going to want you to fill everything out on that you're going to do
[56:54.000 --> 57:01.000]  Then you can either have one of the city marshals serve it or you can get a process server to serve it
[57:01.000 --> 57:06.000]  That's one of my things I got to work on getting the service for the next couple of days
[57:06.000 --> 57:11.000]  The courts and behind the counter of the courtroom, they were running interference too
[57:11.000 --> 57:20.000]  When I went in to show up for the actual arraignment and I tried to tell him before I crossed the bar that I want to reserve my rights
[57:20.000 --> 57:25.000]  Before I crossed the bar under UCC 1-308, the judge kept trying to interrupt me through the whole thing
[57:25.000 --> 57:30.000]  It wouldn't let me express myself telling him I'm there under special appearance, not general and all this other stuff
[57:30.000 --> 57:38.000]  Well, the thing is, 1-308 doesn't have a damn thing to do with that court or special appearance
[57:38.000 --> 57:41.000]  Nothing, absolutely nothing
[57:41.000 --> 57:50.000]  The UCC has nothing to do with this, nothing to do with this
[57:50.000 --> 57:53.000]  Are we clear on that?
[57:53.000 --> 57:58.000]  I hear you saying that. I'm not sure how or why because it's a reservation of your rights in the contract
[57:58.000 --> 58:07.000]  No, it's not. It's a reservation of your rights under commercial activities dealing with those contracts and other provisions of commercial law
[58:07.000 --> 58:11.000]  But you're not in a commercial law venue
[58:11.000 --> 58:17.000]  Okay, you're in an administrative law venue
[58:17.000 --> 58:21.000]  It doesn't have a damn thing to do with that area of law, nothing
[58:21.000 --> 58:32.000]  I tried to hand in the paperwork that I wanted, the judicial notices and stuff like that before the court
[58:32.000 --> 58:39.000]  And the clerks that I handed it had to hand it in to the people at the court, the clerks at the court
[58:39.000 --> 58:42.000]  I tried to do that and the judge said, oh, we don't accept papers in the court
[58:42.000 --> 58:47.000]  Okay, well hang on just a second, Robert, I've got to break and then we'll pick this up on the other side, okay?
[58:47.000 --> 58:50.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back and y'all hang in there
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world
[58:54.000 --> 58:58.000]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it
[58:58.000 --> 59:02.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text
[59:02.000 --> 59:06.000]  But in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture
[59:06.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version
[59:09.000 --> 59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  But the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way
[59:22.000 --> 59:28.000]  Providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking
[59:33.000 --> 59:44.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  Or by ordering online at freestudybible.com
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com
[59:51.000 --> 59:54.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[59:54.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  Logosradionetwork.com
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:28.000]  Markets for Wednesday, the 23rd of November, 2016 are currently trading with gold at $1,191.04 an ounce
[01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:30.000]  Silver $16.39 an ounce
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:33.000]  Texas crude $48.03 a barrel
[01:00:33.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  And Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $741 U.S. currency
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:50.000]  Today in history, the year 2003, the Rose Revolution has its success with the Georgian president-elect
[01:00:50.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  Edward Shevardnadze resigning following weeks of mass protests over what protesters were calling flawed elections
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:02.000]  Today in history
[01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:07.000]  In recent news, this past Sunday night, 400 protesters had a violent confrontation with police
[01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  Which led to the hospitalization of more than two dozen Dakota Access Pipeline protesters
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  Protesters have been seeking to stop the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline since last summer
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  One protestor, a 21-year-old New York resident named Sophia Wilansky, almost lost her arm after an explosion from a concussion grenade
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:27.000]  She might need as many as 20 surgeries to repair her forearm
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  And her father told KFYR, a CNN affiliate, that amputation wouldn't be necessary even though the explosion blew the bone out of her arm
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:45.000]  North Dakota State Patrol spokesman Lt. Tom Iverson stated to media sources that state troopers had not deployed a grenade or any other explosives against protesters on Sunday
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:51.000]  However, there is video and pictures of police spraying water cannons at the protesters in below freezing temperatures
[01:01:51.000 --> 01:01:55.000]  Along with also shooting rubber bullets and tear gas into the crowd
[01:01:55.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  A new bill in the Texas legislature would make it a hate crime to target police officers or first responders
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:12.000]  The legislation was filed just one day after the San Antonio police officer was assassinated while he sentenced patrol car riding a ticket
[01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:15.000]  If passed, the bill would become the first of its kind in the United States
[01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  According to KHOU, Texas Governor Greg Abbott called for a similar bill this July after five Dallas police officers were murdered in the streets during a protest
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:30.000]  If passed, HB 429 would increase the penalty for attacking a cop, firefighter or paramedic
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:43.000]  And this Thanksgiving travel period is expected to be the busiest in almost a decade with nearly 49 million people expected to travel 50 miles or more between Wednesday and Sunday
[01:02:43.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  According to AAA, it is due to lower gas prices and an improving economy
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:52.000]  One thing is for certain, avoiding war with Russia is definitely something to be thankful for
[01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:54.000]  So Happy Thanksgiving y'all
[01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  This was Rick Brody, your lowdown for November 23rd, 2016
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:30.000]  Because you can't strive about and you can't make a run
[01:03:30.000 --> 01:03:34.000]  The woods and the old boys pray don't shot guns
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:42.000]  We say praise and we say ma'am if you ain't into that we don't give a damn
[01:03:42.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  We came from the West Virginia coal mines and the Rocky Mountains and the western skies
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  And we will survive, that's what us country boys are made to do
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  Adapt and overcome just like the Marines, right guys?
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:05.000]  Alright, back to Robert in California
[01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  Alright, you said the judge told you that they don't accept filings in the court
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:15.000]  Well what exactly are they calling the court? Where were you attempting to file this?
[01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  I was at the pedestal podium, you know, where they call you up and ask you guilty, not guilty
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:28.000]  Okay, so you weren't at the clerk where you could file them with the clerk?
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:31.000]  I tried that before the hearing
[01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:32.000]  Okay, and what did they say?
[01:04:32.000 --> 01:04:35.000]  I tried to file it in the courtroom
[01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  Did you tell the judge that we have conflicting information here judge, which is it?
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:46.000]  I told him that I tried to file it beforehand and they told me I had to file it here
[01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  And he said, oh, we don't accept that here, you have to file it with a clerk of the court
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  Okay
[01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:56.000]  So I didn't get to get in information that I thought was critical
[01:04:56.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  And did you move to disqualify this judge?
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:06.000]  No, what I did do is I told when he asked me guilty, not guilty in no contest, I told him I'm not here to plea
[01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:13.000]  I'm here to challenge subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction
[01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  Okay
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  Then he entered a plea on my behalf and I said, objection, you don't represent me
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:31.000]  And he went to go ahead and put a court date in on my behalf and I told him objection, exception, you know, telling him I wanted on the record
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:36.000]  So now it looks like even though I wasn't properly arraigned, it looks like I have a court date
[01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  That's why I said did you move to disqualify this
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:43.000]  Now the thing is if you're in California, this is not a judge
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  This is an administrative hearing officer
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:50.000]  Most likely it's another clerk of the court
[01:05:50.000 --> 01:05:51.000]  Okay
[01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:57.000]  In California, these are 100% administrative, there is no judicial anything involved in this
[01:05:57.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  It's as unconstitutional as it can possibly get because there is never a judicial review of the action
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  Okay
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  This is what they call an administrative hearing officer
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  Okay, a commissioner
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:17.000]  It's not a judge
[01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  All right
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:21.000]  So you need to get rid of this individual
[01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:27.000]  And you can do that very directly by filing a notice of tort with the city that this occurred in
[01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  Against this individual as a representative of that city for violating your rights under the color of law
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  See California statutes are very, very clear
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  The California statutes are very, very clear that everything in California is commercial, absolutely commercial
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:53.000]  Yeah, that's why I thought I would be able to use the UCC 1-308 because all
[01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  No, different kind of commercial
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:06:58.000]  Not the same thing
[01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  When I say commercial, I mean that they use the roads as a place of business
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  That it is commercial traffic that their vehicle code applies to, not private
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:16.000]  Different kind of commercial
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  Okay
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  You're thinking of commerce versus commercial
[01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:27.000]  Yeah
[01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:28.000]  Okay
[01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:34.000]  The last court hearing I went to I challenged jurisdiction, the one I've got an appeal for
[01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:37.000]  I don't even know what a brief is, I got to figure that out
[01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  But they never proved jurisdiction when I challenged it
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  So anything they made from there on is null and void because they never proved jurisdiction
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  Well, the thing is, is you've got to be able to show they never proved jurisdiction
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  And the record is the only way to do that
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:56.000]  And the record must show that you objected to the lack of jurisdiction
[01:07:56.000 --> 01:08:00.000]  And that you made a proper argument showing how they lack that jurisdiction
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  Because the presumption is always in their favor that they have it until it is challenged
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:13.000]  Once it's challenged, they've got to prove it up
[01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  But if it's not challenged, the presumption stands
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:20.000]  Well, I did pretty much the same thing on the first case as I did this one
[01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:24.000]  I told them I'm not here to plead, I'm here to challenge jurisdiction
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  Yeah, but is it the same person in this case as there was in the other case?
[01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  No, a different black robe
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  Yeah, all of them think that they can do what they want, but some of them are more afraid to do it than others
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:50.000]  So I need to file a tort against this one officer
[01:08:50.000 --> 01:08:57.000]  I notice a tort against whatever court and municipality this individual is allegedly operating on behalf of
[01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:03.000]  And against this individual personally for violations of rights under color of law
[01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  The court was, the demand for the proving of jurisdiction was made, the court refused to provide evidence of that jurisdiction
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:17.000]  Which of course is the prosecutor's job to do, but there wasn't a prosecutor there, was there?
[01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:20.000]  No, there's never a prosecutor there
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:23.000]  Right, because it's administrative
[01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  It's administrative, that's why there's no prosecutor
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:33.000]  And they never prove jurisdiction, they just assume and assert it
[01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  Exactly
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  So they never have jurisdiction, even if they had it in the first place, they ruined their own jurisdiction by not proving it
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  No, I told you the presumption is they have it until challenged
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:57.000]  The person that they're going after has to have the good sense to challenge the jurisdiction
[01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  If they don't, then the presumption stands
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  Once you tell them that you challenged your jurisdiction, it's their duty to prove it
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  Correct, that's what challenge it means
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:17.000]  And when you challenge it on the record, you know, in your arraignment, then they have to prove it subsequently from there
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  The prosecution does, yes
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:28.000]  The court is not under the burden to prove anything because the court does not invoke jurisdiction under its own authority
[01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  The jurisdiction is invoked by the prosecutor stating how that court's jurisdiction is brought to bear
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:49.000]  Okay, without that pleading, there is no evidence of jurisdiction on the record at all
[01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  The court cannot declare jurisdiction on its own without some lawful authority to show it
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  That's what they seem to try to do
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:11.000]  Well, of course it is because it's not a court, it's an administrative hearing panel
[01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:19.000]  That's exactly why they can tell you you're not entitled to a jury trial
[01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:26.000]  I was trying to make sure I have the right fee waiver so I can obtain a court reporter
[01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  and have all the fees associated with fighting this case covered, the witness fees, evidence fees, everything
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  Well, that's something you're going to have to check, the rules of procedure and the rules dealing with your lack of ability to pay
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  Okay, you're going to have to check that in California specifically
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:12:01.000]  I had a hard time finding the vehicle code that delineated the same thing as the transportation code in Texas, the 543, but I found it
[01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  Well, good, now you've got to find the rest of it
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:13.000]  That's interesting how you wrote it for Texas, so you've got to sit there and read it and do all your research for the different states
[01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:17.000]  Well, that's the problem, one guy can't do it for every state
[01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:22.000]  I know, we appreciate you guys, we do
[01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:30.000]  Alright, well good luck, but yeah, get to studying and get to challenging
[01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:40.000]  Notice of tort, notice of tort, motion to disqualify, those are the two things you need to file next
[01:12:40.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  Alright, write those down and put it
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  And you'll need to see what California requires in a notice of tort and in a motion to disqualify
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:10.000]  Okay, it seems like the law library is my favorite place to hang out now
[01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:16.000]  Well, good, it'll get you better at this than any other library will
[01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  Yeah, I'd rather sit there at the law library and read, which I'm not really a big reader, but then read, watch movies
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  Yeah, well, good luck with it
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:27.000]  Thank you
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  Alright, Robert, I'm going to move on to my next caller
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  God bless, thanks
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:33.000]  Alright, bye bye
[01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  Alright, now we've got Charles in Washington, Charles, what do you got?
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  Hey, how you doing again? I'm sorry I had to call you back on this
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:50.000]  When you gave me that information on the seven, the website to look up for the seven discoveries to present on that
[01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  The seven interrogatories
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:58.000]  Seven interrogatories, okay, seven interrogatories, interrogatories
[01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  Now, when you told me what website to go on to, I must have confused it with the other one, so could you slowly give that to me again?
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:15.000]  Taooflaw, T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W.wordpress.com
[01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:18.000]  Okay, that's what I got, that's number six, because I got all your websites
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:19.000]  Yeah
[01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:21.000]  That's what I got confused with, okay
[01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  So when I go into that, you told me, as soon as I pulled that out, you told me to go into the blog, I think I remember
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:37.000]  The blog, yeah, the article, you have to find the article that's got that heading on it, dealing with civil infractions and what to do if your state has them
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:42.000]  That's the name of the article, that's the article you're looking for
[01:14:42.000 --> 01:14:52.000]  But you can also just type in the search field at the top of the page, civil infraction, it will pull up a list of articles that contain that phrase
[01:14:52.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  That will be one of them
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  Okay, okay, in the search, okay
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:05.000]  Because the young lady I used to date, she did all this stuff for me because I told you my brain gets scrambled from the injury
[01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:08.000]  And so I'm not with her anymore and I didn't have that stuff
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  So okay, I got the right website, and you told me to look it up under the article, go to the search engine, pull up civil infractions, and look for the seventh erogatory discovery
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  Find the article that says civil infractions and what to do if your state has them, and toward the bottom of that article is a list of seven interrogatories to file in your motion for discovery
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:40.000]  In motion for discovery
[01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:42.000]  Okay, I got it this time
[01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  Okay, and that's what I needed to find out
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:49.000]  Okay, so from that I should be okay
[01:15:49.000 --> 01:16:02.000]  Now one other thing, when I looked up, I only did it once, but when I want to go back to look up the conversation that we had, the archive, that's up under the, which one was that, is that up under the logos?
[01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  Well, it'll be under the archives and it'll say Eddie's night, whatever the date that Monday night was
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:16.000]  Okay, under the archives, under the archives, Eddie's night, okay
[01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:23.000]  Yeah, I was trying to find that, so I didn't have to call you back, and I think I emailed you the other day and I don't know if I got the right email
[01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  I put Eddie Craig, rule of law
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:31.000]  No, it's eddie at ruleoflawradio.com
[01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  Ah, okay, I put the Craig in there, so you didn't get it
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  Nope
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  Okay, thanks for calling
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:45.000]  Bye bye
[01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  Bye bye
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  Alright folks, this is rule of law radio calling number 512-646-1984
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  Give us a call, get in line, we're taking them all, we'll be right back after this break
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:17:07.000]  I love logos, without the shows on this network I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends, I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back
[01:17:07.000 --> 01:17:13.000]  I need my truth fix, I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air
[01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:22.000]  How can I help logos?
[01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked, whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:31.000]  With ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, first thing you do is clear your cookies
[01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:37.000]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  No
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  No
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:50.000]  No
[01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  I mean, yes
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:55.000]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:17:56.000]  Thank you so much
[01:17:56.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  You're welcome
[01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Happy holidays, logos
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition
[01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that
[01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Order now
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Lafogos Radio Network
[01:19:22.000 --> 01:19:29.000]  As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I take a look at my life and realize it's not enough
[01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:35.000]  Cause I've been practicing and laughing so long that even my mama thinks that my mind is gone
[01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:38.000]  But I ain't never crossed a man that didn't deserve it
[01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  Me be treated like a punk, you know that's unheard of
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:44.000]  You better watch how you're talking and where you're walking
[01:19:44.000 --> 01:19:47.000]  Or you and your homies might be lying and talking
[01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:50.000]  I really hate to trip, but I gotta lope
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:53.000]  As they cope, I see myself in the pistol smoke, fool
[01:19:53.000 --> 01:19:56.000]  I'm the kind of G, your little homies wanna be like
[01:19:56.000 --> 01:19:59.000]  On my knees in the night, you're saying prayers in the street light
[01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:05.000]  We've been spending most of our lives living in the death of paradise
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:11.000]  We've been spending most of our lives living in the death of paradise
[01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:17.000]  We've been spending most of our lives living in the death of paradise
[01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  Gangsters Paradise, believe it or not folks, it isn't just in the poor parts of big cities
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:34.000]  Gangsters Paradise could describe any part of America these days with a governmental body, believe it or not
[01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  If it involves someone saying that they have the right to tell you what to do with your person and your property
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  Or some attorney threatening that the law could be applied to you in ways that would prevent you from exercising the rights that you inherently have
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  You're in a gangster's paradise, and the gangsters all wear suits, ties, and are supported and protected by those wearing uniforms, badges, and guns
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:09.000]  And now they're gonna protect them even more with a new bill that makes it a hate crime
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:19.000]  To protect yourself from such individuals should they get out of control and assault you or attempt to harm you unjustifiably
[01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  Think about that
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:28.000]  All right, that being said, we have Olivier in Tennessee. Olivier, what do you got?
[01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:36.000]  I can't understand you there, Olivier, sounds like you're talking out of the bottom of a tin can
[01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:39.000]  Hello, can you hear me now? There you go
[01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  All right, kind of funny situation, attorney called, I mean, I was in civil court, the criminal attorney came up and told me that my trial date was going to be moved to next month
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  And not to worry about the trial date, so okay, continuing my civil case
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:08.000]  Then went off for vacation, came back this morning, and they called me up talking about, I got a trial
[01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:10.000]  I'm like, yo, what do you mean I got a trial?
[01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  They're like, well, the court and the juries are here, and I need to get there because something happened
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  And he told me that there wasn't going to be a trial, he's going to try to address it in the court because that's what happened
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  So we went to court, we addressed it to the court, the judge said, well, she didn't put it in the documents or whatever
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:45.000]  And it was, she was going to proceed because she didn't want to keep the case on the document
[01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  So I decided to represent myself in the court because he did not file the motions that I wanted and some of the things I forgot right now
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:01.000]  But I'm trying to use the justice, it's a waste of time
[01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  So we're going through the trial and the main thing in the statute where it says evading arrest
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  Also, the second part of it says that it is a defense that the arrest was unlawful
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:24.000]  And they would not allow me to interject that into the trial
[01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:32.000]  The judge said that the rule that I could not, that part was excluded
[01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  They can't exclude it if they're using one part of the statute with an affirmative defense stated in that statute, they cannot exclude the affirmative defense
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  I understand, but that's what they did, I mean, basically throughout the whole trial as I was in, once he realized I dislodged the judge, the attorney from his position, the state attorney is going to stand up and say
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  Well, he's going to argue in motion that, oh, well, I need to understand the ramifications that I can be faced in jail time or prison time
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:24.000]  And I'm sitting here like, why are you concerned? Why are you concerned with what I get?
[01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  I'm sitting here like, are you worried? Is it? So during the trial, he's going to argue that, well, he's going to argue constitutional defenses and engagement in commerce
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  And those facts are not being discussed here and basically asking the judge to restrict me from making my arguments
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  Right, which some of them were still made because, you know, I'm pro se and I stumble across those, it just comes out right
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:05.000]  But they got to object and
[01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  But how did it turn out? And you realize you got played by that attorney, correct? Which attorney told you, your attorney or their attorney?
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:24.000]  Oh, he got dropped. All right. Well, let's see if he'll give me a call back.
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:30.000]  All right. While we're waiting on you to call back in, Olivier, I'm going to take up Jay and then we'll pick you up when you get back on.
[01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  Jay, what can we do for you?
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  Hi, how are you doing?
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:36.000]  I'm doing all right.
[01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:45.000]  All right. I called you a month or so ago about a case I had out in Florida that affected my Texas driver's license
[01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:51.000]  And you gave me some information. I've been looking into it and I'm working my way in that direction.
[01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  This stuff is so overwhelming. It's hard to know.
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:26:01.000]  I mean, I've spent hours and hours on the computer reading some of your material and it's astounding and extremely helpful.
[01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  So that being said, without getting into what we all know is just a debacle in the system.
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  Right.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  Between now, between then and now, I have switched insurance companies. Okay.
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  Now, since that time, the Department of Public Safety sent me a letter with an order of suspension.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  All right. My license was already suspended.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:33.000]  I went and acquired an occupational, like a good little boy, just to keep the hounds off my back.
[01:26:33.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  I got pulled over. And they're explaining to me that the reason for this suspension is because of failure to carry that SR-102.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  It also ironically states that this suspension has resulted in the disqualification of all commercial driving privileges as well.
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:27:03.000]  And it says that my occupational or essential need driver license may not be issued for the operation, blah, blah, blah.
[01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  And it says that my occupational is also suspended.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  Well, the thing is the Texas Department of Public Safety is acting illegally in this case because they cannot suspend a license,
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:21.000]  especially one used to supply a means of living without a hearing, despite what they would like you to think.
[01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:23.000]  Correct.
[01:27:23.000 --> 01:27:31.000]  Correct. So that being said, obviously, I want to file a motion for dismissal on those grounds.
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  There's nowhere to file a motion until you file a demand for a hearing in the State Office of Administrative Hearings, which is where these take place.
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  Okay. Now, what I did was I went and looked up, I used their statutory authority comments in this letterhead.
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  And I found that Section 601.401 says that I have 30 days to respond to this or to appeal this departmental action.
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  Yeah. Did it tell you where to appeal it to?
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:24.000]  No. Let's see. It says, well, okay, the county court at the law in the county in which the person resides, or the county court in the county in which a person resides,
[01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  let me close everyone. Yeah. Okay. So it'll be in the Karen County. Okay. Okay. So I know it says to appeal. It doesn't tell me about that on here.
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  I had to find it out for myself. Right. See, that's another thing, improper notice.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:50.000]  They're not telling you that you have the right to appeal that, nor are they telling you to have a right to a hearing before it happens.
[01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  You know you can sue the Department of Public Safety for both of those, right?
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:29:05.000]  I was hoping to hear those words. That's another ball of wax. But in doing so, don't – aren't it kind of –
[01:29:05.000 --> 01:29:10.000]  It's administrative fraud. It is administrative fraud.
[01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:23.000]  Correct. And that is grounds for – a great grounds for a lawsuit. Yep. In doing so, does that information carry over and they go, well, it's going to be our best answer is just to dump this thing, you know.
[01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  No, because they're – the one side has nothing to do with the other. One's completely administrative. The other is judicial in function. They don't touch.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  It doesn't mean politically speaking they won't overlap, but jurisdictionally speaking, they don't.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  Okay. I hear the music, so you got to take a break. Yes, sir. Hang on just a minute. We'll be right back to finish it up, okay? Sure enough.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984. A half an hour to go. Give us a call. Get in line. Let's talk.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  Does stress make your hair turn gray? For years, silver foxes have been claiming as much, but scientists now say they can explain why.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back to tell you how stress ages us prematurely.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:27.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  When the going gets tough, the hairs turn gray. It may sound like folklore, but scientists say chronic stress really does make us look older and heightens the risk of disease.
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:31:03.000]  During a four-week experiment, Duke University researchers injected mice with an adrenaline-like compound that mimics stress in human beings.
[01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  They found a sharp reduction in P53, a protein that keeps cells healthy and prevents cancer.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  When the mice's level of P53 stayed low, their chromosomes began to develop irregularities that sped up the aging process and increased their risk of cancer.
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:25.000]  So don't skip that vacation. It may do more than just calm your mind. It could help keep you young.
[01:31:25.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:07.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:12.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:15.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:22.000]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  And we accept Bitcoin. As a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints,
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:33.000]  you can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:12.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradio.com.
[01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:44.000]  Look at them yo-yos, that's the way you do it.
[01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:48.000]  You play the guitar on MTV.
[01:33:48.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  That ain't workin', that's the way you do it.
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  Money for nothin' and you choose to be free.
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:59.000]  That ain't workin', that's the way you do it.
[01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  Yep, that's the way they do it, money for nothin'.
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  And they chicks are after its tricks.
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:11.000]  All their tricks for free and we gotta pay for it.
[01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:17.000]  We need to make them understand we are not piggy banks for them to raid whenever they feel like it.
[01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:20.000]  All right, let's get back to Jay in Texas real quick.
[01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  All right, Jay, what else you got?
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  All right, so to recap, I need to return to them a response.
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  And that response will be that I want an appeal hearing on this suspension, correct?
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:49.000]  Yeah, you tell them that you intend to appeal it and you need the information necessary on where,
[01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  when and who with to file that demand for appeal.
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  Okay, so I'm notifying the department that I intend to appeal and I need the information to move forward with that appeal.
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  Correct.
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  Okay, that being said.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:11.000]  Now, don't count on them to tell you that, okay?
[01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:13.000]  Be looking yourself.
[01:35:13.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  I did my own homework.
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  Exactly.
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  Well, fortunately, I did my own homework and I'm a step ahead of them.
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:23.000]  Right, so now all you can do is fact check them to see if they give you the right information
[01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  or even bother to tell you the information.
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:28.000]  Make sure you do everything in writing.
[01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  Make sure you keep good copies of everything.
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  When you send it to them, make sure it's certified mail return receipt requested so you can prove service and everything else.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  Because if you do turn around and sue them, you can show that they were intentionally giving you misinformation
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  or no information at all to impede your ability to get the appeal.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:50.000]  Fantastic.
[01:35:50.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  And by the way, the last time I talked to you, I was a nervous wreck because I didn't know what I was.
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:57.000]  I was like no lights were on.
[01:35:57.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  I was just falling around and trying to write stuff down.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:02.000]  Well, hopefully now you're pissed off enough.
[01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  None of that feels the same.
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:05.000]  Well, I'm not.
[01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:07.000]  Oh, I'm in the light now.
[01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  I'm not writing anything down because I can just go to your archive and I'll just listen to it again.
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:12.000]  All right.
[01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:14.000]  I can write it down at my own leisure, replay it.
[01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:17.000]  And so, okay, thank you for that.
[01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:22.000]  Now, the other thing that I discussed with you was my case in Florida.
[01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  And we are established that they got dittily squashed, but yet here it still haunts me.
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  So you told me to file a motion to quash.
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  Right.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:33.000]  Now, why would I file?
[01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:34.000]  What is the difference?
[01:36:34.000 --> 01:36:37.000]  Why would I file a motion to quash and not a motion to dismiss?
[01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:43.000]  Because I'm looking at the definition of motion to quash and it speaks of a mistake made by a lawyer.
[01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  Okay.
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  Listen carefully.
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  Okay.
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  A motion to quash, whatever they're using as a charging instrument, which they cannot proceed without, okay,
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  has the same effect as far as stopping progress, but not permanently, unlike the motion to dismiss,
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  which, depending upon how it's granted, may or may not also stop forward momentum permanently.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:09.000]  Okay.
[01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:14.000]  If they dismiss it without prejudice, they can pick up where they screwed up and continue forward.
[01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  If it's dismissed with prejudice, then they can never file it again.
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:27.000]  But here with the motion to quash, whatever they're attempting to use as the charging instrument to start the process,
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  if you kill that dead, the process stops.
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:32.000]  They have to refile.
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:35.000]  They have to do it correctly.
[01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  Depending upon the situation, they may never try to do it correctly.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  They may never try to refile it at all, in which case it has the same effect.
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:52.000]  So none of this will be answered for me until I get a response from them.
[01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  You're probably not going to get a response unless they decide to challenge what you're challenging.
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  Okay.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  And my motion to quash will be sent to them in much the same way I would send a motion to dismiss.
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:08.000]  Correct.
[01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  A motion is a motion, correct?
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:10.000]  Correct.
[01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:16.000]  So I'm going to put all my pertinent information in there, their lack of jurisdiction, their lack of evidence.
[01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  When I do a motion, should it be prefaced with or should it include by special appearance or things like that?
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  Everything you do is by special appearance if you're challenging personal jurisdiction in any way.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  The moment you fail to assert special appearance, personal jurisdiction is waived.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  Okay.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  Because I went and read on your, I believe it was in, yes, it was motions that from a certain point on,
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  it was referred to as Baker.
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:54.000]  Baker, not Mr. Baker or John Baker or whatever the case, what his name was.
[01:38:54.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  You always start with the full name and identity of the party,
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:02.000]  and then you're free to abbreviate any references to that party as you see fit throughout the document.
[01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  However, be consistent.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:12.000]  The first time the reference is used, you use the full name of the individual, the organization, whatever,
[01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:18.000]  like Texas Department of Public Safety or the state of Texas Department of Public Safety,
[01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  however the full legal name of it is, and then you can put in parentheses and double quotes DPS,
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  that shows that for the rest of the document, you'll refer to this agency in the shorthand of DPS.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  DPS, right.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  Okay.
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:46.000]  Now, I guess I need, we did discuss that Florida and Texas are almost identical in their.
[01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:48.000]  Almost all of the states are.
[01:39:48.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  They all come from a common thread of statutory construction.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  Right, so we've got Kentucky that still does, what is it, Demure, and then.
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:00.000]  Right, as does California.
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:04.000]  Texas doesn't do Demure anymore, even though they should be doing it,
[01:40:04.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  because due process requires that step to be available.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:10.000]  Right.
[01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  Again, I read that motion piece, and I read it two or three times,
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  went back and started looking at, well, this is pertinent to me, and this is pertinent to me,
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:22.000]  because not all of it was.
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  Right.
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  I didn't feel like it was, because it was a different case,
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:32.000]  but it carried a lot of the same objections, and it made a lot of sense to me at that point.
[01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:39.000]  The pieces were falling together, as it were, and I wanted to say that I found it rather serendipitous
[01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  that you started your show with the exact thing that I wanted to talk about.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:46.000]  Well, while this is useful.
[01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  Which is this.
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:53.000]  Yeah, and well, yeah, but I had a lot of, the last time I called you, I was the first person,
[01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:56.000]  the very first person, and I was like, wow, I've got to be so lucky this time.
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:41:01.000]  I had to fight to get through, but I did, and like I said, I thought it was great.
[01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:05.000]  I was meant to be, but I've tried it a couple of times since then, and I kind of gave up,
[01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:07.000]  had other things going on.
[01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  That being said, thank you again for all your valuable information.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  I'm going to go back and read more.
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  How long before the archive will become available?
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  Is it about two days?
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:20.000]  That all depends upon Deborah's workload.
[01:41:20.000 --> 01:41:24.000]  She's the producer, and she's the one that puts the archives up between whatever other production
[01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  she's got going on, so I can't really tell you.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  It varies.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:32.000]  Sometimes it's the next day, sometimes it's a week or two.
[01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:36.000]  Well, I'm going to get out of here, so maybe you can grab one more call or help them out,
[01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  but Eddie, thank you again for your help, and have a great evening.
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:40.000]  Yes, sir, you too.
[01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  All right, let's pick up with Olivier where we lost him there.
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:47.000]  All right, Olivier, the question I was asking when you disappeared was,
[01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:53.000]  the attorney that told you you didn't have trial, was that your attorney or some other attorney?
[01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  My attorney.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:42:03.000]  Oh, there's a definite malpractice right there.
[01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:09.000]  That's so, all right.
[01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:13.000]  I found it very funny because during the jury instruction,
[01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  it was explained to the court that they should not take any of their own opinions
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:26.000]  or research any of the cases or anything in that aspect.
[01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  If they are refrained, they have to take the order and the specific parameters from the court.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:45.000]  And to me, that seemed very awkward.
[01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  Yeah.
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:50.000]  Is that allowed?
[01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:57.000]  Well, they can tell the jury, the jury can't take anything outside of what's presented at trial,
[01:42:57.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  except for their own common sense.
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:08.000]  The jury is free to use their own moral compass and knowledge to make their decision and whatever, okay?
[01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:15.000]  They're just not free to go look for additional facts and research on the case that they're sitting over.
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  Okay.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  Okay?
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  All right.
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:20.000]  They can go into the back room and say, you know what?
[01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  I don't agree with this law.
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:22.000]  I don't agree with any of this crap.
[01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  I don't care what facts they put out there.
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:27.000]  This is BS and I'm not going to convict this guy.
[01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  They're free to do that.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:32.000]  And there is nothing the judge or prosecutor can do about it.
[01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  Yeah, I understand that.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  Yeah, but they can't go looking at alternative sources for facts
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  because there's no guarantee that those sources are actually being factual.
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:51.000]  It could wind up being detrimental if someone's spinning it the wrong way for the wrong person and it's not the truth.
[01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  Hang on just a second, man.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  I'll pick you up on the other side of this break.
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:43:56.000]  We'll be right back for the last segment, folks.
[01:43:56.000 --> 01:43:57.000]  Y'all hang in there.
[01:43:57.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  I'll try to get to you all.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:15.000]  and now you can win two.
[01:44:15.000 --> 01:44:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:44:21.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:34.000]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:34.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:41.000 --> 01:44:46.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:49.000]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.000 --> 01:44:57.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:44:57.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:05.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:05.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  On the day I was born, the nurses all gathered round, they gazed in wide wonder at the joy they had found. The nurse spoke up, said, leave this one alone. She could tell right away that I was bad to the bone, bad to the bone, bad to the bone.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  That is me. All right. All right. Let's finish this up with Olivier.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:42.000]  Olivier, let's get through this as quick as we can and see if I can get these other two callers done in this segment.
[01:46:42.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  Okay. Basically, it was a lot of limiting me not making arguments that I'm able to be made.
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  Did you object to each and every one of these that you thought was incorrect?
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:57.000]  Yes.
[01:46:57.000 --> 01:47:00.000]  Was this a court of record?
[01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:01.000]  Yes.
[01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:10.000]  Okay. Then at least you've got everything setting up at least for appeal. Whether or not it's going to be accurate enough to change the outcome, we'll see, but at least it's in there.
[01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:26.000]  Okay. Yeah, I was found guilty by a jury, and it was on the leaving of that evidence, but it was fun. It was fun.
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:30.000]  Okay. We'll now do this real quick. When was this?
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  Today.
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:38.000]  Okay. Do they require a motion for new trial or a motion to reconsider after a judgment has been entered in such cases?
[01:47:38.000 --> 01:47:39.000]  Motion for new trial.
[01:47:39.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  Okay. File a motion for new trial in that accuse the judge of judicial misconduct for not allowing a challenge to the validity of the warrantless seizure and arrest and thus a challenge to his judicial incompetence and failure to apply the law to the facts by refusing to allow you to introduce an affirmative defense.
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:16.000]  Based upon that warrantless arrest, never being proved as being valid.
[01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:19.000]  Okay.
[01:48:19.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  Yeah. If the statute says the arrest must have been lawful, or it says it's an affirmative defense that the arrest was unlawful, okay, all you do is raise the issue that it was unlawful. Then the issue goes to the state to have to prove that it was lawful, which they did not do in this trial, I'm presuming, because you were forbidden to raise the issue.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:46.000]  Thus, they didn't have to prove it and weren't going to try.
[01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:55.000]  Which means in your motion for new trial, you can now get into the record everything the judge attempted to keep out.
[01:48:55.000 --> 01:49:06.000]  So in your motion for new trial, file a motion to disqualify this judge from all future proceedings in this matter.
[01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:16.000]  And file a judicial conduct complaint and attach all of them as copies to this after you file them.
[01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  Okay.
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:36.000]  Not that these damned attorneys give a crap about the rule of law or following their own rules, or especially getting rid of their own criminal brethren. But the more documents we have, the more the revolution can stand upon the fact that it's acting correctly when it shoots them in the head.
[01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  Right. My attorney, because I was not properly dressed, I was in my onesie and in my sandal, because one, I really don't care about my appearance. I'm going to go into law in the first place.
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:56.000]  They gave me an opportunity to change. I'm like, man, y'all got me out here, we're going to run it.
[01:49:56.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  And then, while we were going through trial, my attorney, during the break, he was looking at me like, he did not expect that. He was looking like, wow.
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:37.000]  It's like, you're getting all these objections because you're just, you're killing them. You're killing them on, you know what I'm saying, I guess, my understanding of it. But the judge is allowing the jury to, is instructing the jury to remove those comments and do not allow this to be entered in all this, which, as you said, is all.
[01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:43.000]  Do we lose you again?
[01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:53.000]  Ah, well, sounds like we did. All right. If you call, Olivia, I don't know if I'm going to have time to get back to you if you call back in, but if you do, give it a shot.
[01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:58.000]  All right. Real quick, Ted in Washington. Ted, what do you got?
[01:50:58.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  Good evening, Eddie. Thank you for taking my call.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  Hey, I was wondering how late would it be or how bad would it be to fight a red light intersection camera ticket?
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  Well, what do you mean too late or how bad?
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  Well, I borrowed a car from a relative and I went through an intersection not knowing that there was a ticket that got issued. I got sent to the registered owners, which was my relative. They paid it inadvertently about a month ago without telling me.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:43.000]  And it wasn't them that was in the car. It was me. And I told them, at least you should have told me ahead of time. Don't just tell me half-heartedly that you paid it. Maybe I could have done something ahead of time.
[01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:48.000]  If they've already paid it, they may as well kiss it goodbye.
[01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:53.000]  Okay. All right. I was afraid of that. I was hoping that there'd be something I can do because it was me in the car.
[01:51:53.000 --> 01:52:00.000]  Now, once they've got their money grubbing hands on that money, they're never going to give you an avenue to get it back.
[01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  Wow. Okay. Man, I was hoping we can do something about it because I know it's something—
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:19.000]  The only thing you can do now is sue them for fraud. But the problem is they paid the ticket, not you. They have to sue for fraud. They're not going to sue or they wouldn't have paid the ticket.
[01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  Yeah. Yeah, I have a feeling about that.
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:28.000]  Well, that's the quandary you find yourself in. The only remedy you have is one that they're never going to take.
[01:52:28.000 --> 01:52:30.000]  Which would be what?
[01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  To sue.
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:42.000]  To sue. Yeah. No, you're right. I know how these people are and uneducated and very afraid. So, no, boy.
[01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:44.000]  All righty. It was worth a shot.
[01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:46.000]  All right. Well, thanks for calling in.
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:47.000]  Thank you again.
[01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  All right.
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:49.000]  No problem.
[01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:54.000]  All right. Charles in Washington is back. Charles, what do you got?
[01:52:54.000 --> 01:53:04.000]  Okay. Eddie had a few things that I was just going to email you about. One is that I was denied a fee waiver on a hearing. Again, one of them tow hearings that was already scheduled.
[01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:17.000]  I went on a default, but the judge decided to want to give the tow company the money for the tow but remove the fees that the officer had from the ticket and everything else. I thought that was wrong to do that.
[01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Did you sue for the fees that the officer did whatever?
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:37.000]  No, that's what I have. I was having all these tow problems, which I have another one, and I went to court on the fee waiver, I mean, on the tow hearing, and the officer didn't show, so I went on a default.
[01:53:37.000 --> 01:53:40.000]  Okay. But you're not following what I'm asking you here.
[01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  You got a judgment default against a tow company. That's what you're saying, right?
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:57.000]  No, I got one against the officer, but they allow the tow fees to be paid to the tow company, which I thought when you went on default, you don't pay on anything.
[01:53:57.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  Who did you sue, the tow company or the cop?
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:04.000]  I took them both to court.
[01:54:04.000 --> 01:54:05.000]  Okay.
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:06.000]  Okay.
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:12.000]  So how did you win against the cop and lose against the tow company? That doesn't make any sense.
[01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  I know, but I've been to many of these before. The officer never showed up. I requested the officer to show. He didn't show up.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:22.000]  But what did you sue him for?
[01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  For improper towing my vehicle.
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:30.000]  No, no, not what he did. What did you sue him to recover?
[01:54:30.000 --> 01:54:34.000]  Oh, my vehicle. I'm sorry, my vehicle.
[01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  Well, that's what you'd have got from the tow company.
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:44.000]  What did you sue the cop for? Monetary damages, what?
[01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  For improper towing my car.
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:57.000]  Okay. Again, what he did, what did you ask for in damages or fees or money because of that action?
[01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  Well, in the past, I've never stated anything. I said, you just go for court hearing to find out if they were right in towing your vehicle or not right, which in my case is that 45 days over expiry time.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:12.000]  Okay. Well, there's a problem here. There's still a problem here.
[01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:20.000]  First off, the cop is not immune from those suits if you do that. You should be suing him for money so he'll stop doing it.
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:30.000]  Second thing is, I don't know how you're going to win against the cop saying that his order to tow was illegal, but the tow company still gets the money.
[01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:33.000]  That doesn't make sense to me.
[01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  It don't. So that was one thing. So what I did, I heard you say something before when you write a motion to appeal, I have that case reviewed.
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:50.000]  I do it with not the chief presiding judge of that court, which is what I did.
[01:55:50.000 --> 01:55:57.000]  I wrote a request asking to review it, the decision. In the past, I've won on that, but I heard you say something about don't do it there with the court.
[01:55:57.000 --> 01:56:03.000]  Do it with the, like mine is in Olympia, where the main office is. You said find out who that chief presiding judge is over everybody.
[01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  So I didn't know if I should be dealing with the court chief presiding judge over the judges or administrators.
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:14.000]  The head administrative judge is who you have to file it with here.
[01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:20.000]  Okay. The head administrative judge. And that's what I thought I did. And that's why they have overturned the decisions.
[01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:26.000]  Okay. So you answered that question. So that's what I'm asking them to overlook or to review.
[01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  How is it that I can win on the police towing my car, but yet the tow company still gets the money. And they've done this to me twice now.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:43.000]  Well, that's the thing. If you're not actually suing the cop or something, that could be a problem.
[01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:49.000]  Okay. Well, I didn't know I had the, exactly. But I'm not doing any motions, which is what you told me.
[01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:58.000]  Well, the other thing is, is are you suing the tow company for damages as well as the cost of the tow?
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:01.000]  Basically, no, just for cost of the tow.
[01:57:01.000 --> 01:57:09.000]  Well, don't do that either. Sue them for damages of at least since the entire thing is a perpetration of a fraudulent act,
[01:57:09.000 --> 01:57:13.000]  most likely there's a treble damages law in your state.
[01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:20.000]  You could claim up to three times the cost of the tow and all other fees associated with it.
[01:57:20.000 --> 01:57:28.000]  Every dime that you had to spend to get it, you can sue for three times the amount.
[01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:33.000]  Well, see, this is what I hadn't been doing because you just started telling me why am I going to court on these things.
[01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:38.000]  I should be filing suit. So that's what I've been trying to learn, how to go about filing suits and what can I sue for.
[01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:42.000]  And this is the second time you told me how a percentage of what to sue for.
[01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:49.000]  Yeah. That's why I said you need to find a book on what constitutes valid causes of action in your state.
[01:57:49.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  Okay.
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:52.000]  Valid cause of action. Okay.
[01:57:52.000 --> 01:57:53.000]  Yeah.
[01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:54.000]  Causes of action.
[01:57:54.000 --> 01:58:03.000]  Yeah. Causes of action is what tells you what the legal claim is that you have and exactly what you must prove in order to win that claim.
[01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  Okay.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:12.000]  All right. So go down to a law library and ask them to see a book on causes of action for your state.
[01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  Causes of action. Okay.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  Okay.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  I'll email you on the rest of them.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  Okay.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  Okay. Thank you.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:19.000]  All right, Charles.
[01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  Good night.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  Good night.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  All right, folks. This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  Olivier, I'm sorry we didn't get to finish the conversation.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  If you need to, give me an email with a phone number and I'll call you back and we'll talk directly.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:35.000]  Folks, I want to thank y'all for listening. Please keep us in your financial prayers.
[01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  Please send us donations whenever you can because it's the only way we stay alive here and pay what we pay and it ain't enough.
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Y'all keep with us. Keep listening. We'll see you next week.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:11.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosradioNetwork.com.