[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000] The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your deli bulletins for the commodities market. [00:08.000 --> 00:16.000] Today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [00:20.000 --> 00:29.000] Markets for Friday, the 4th of November, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,304.10 an ounce, silver $18.41 an ounce. [00:29.000 --> 00:37.000] Tests is crude, $44.66 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $697 U.S. currency. [00:41.000 --> 00:50.000] Today in history, the year 1952, the United States government establishes the National Security Agency, or NSA, an intelligence organization of the United States government [00:50.000 --> 00:57.000] responsible for global monitoring, collection, and processing of information and data for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes. [00:57.000 --> 01:00.000] The NSA was established today in history. [01:03.000 --> 01:13.000] In recent news, WikiLeaks just dumped part 30 of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta's hacked emails, bringing the total thus far to over $47,000. [01:13.000 --> 01:22.000] Julian Assange, who still is essentially on house arrest at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, gave an interview with Russia Today where he claims that the outcome of next Tuesday's presidential election [01:22.000 --> 01:31.000] between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton has already been decided, saying, quote, because he has had every establishment off his side, Trump does not have one establishment, [01:31.000 --> 01:35.000] maybe with the exception of the evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment. [01:35.000 --> 01:44.000] Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, et cetera, are all united behind Hillary Clinton and the media as well, media owners and the journalists themselves. [01:44.000 --> 01:58.000] This is days after political activists discovered a hidden website for WRCB and NBC affiliate out of Chattanooga, Tennessee, showing election results with Hillary Clinton securing 343 electoral votes and 42 percent of the popular vote. [01:58.000 --> 02:04.000] Hillary, her campaign, and the media are accusing Russia for the hacking of tens of thousands of emails that WikiLeaks has dumped out in the past weeks. [02:04.000 --> 02:08.000] However, Julian Assange has vehemently denied any involvement from the Kremlin. [02:08.000 --> 02:21.000] A majority of Hillary's hacked emails that have been released via WikiLeaks since March of 2016 can be searched through at WikiLeaks.org forward slash Clinton dash emails. [02:21.000 --> 02:33.000] CBS News reported earlier today that U.S. intelligence agencies have alerted joint terrorism task forces that al Qaeda could potentially be planning terrorist attacks in New York, Texas and Virginia for Monday, the day before the election. [02:33.000 --> 02:42.000] There are no specific cities and landmarks are mentioned. Counterterrorism spokespersons have stated that as the election day nears, federal law enforcement is planning for several worst case scenarios. [02:42.000 --> 02:54.000] While earlier this week, an alert warned local police of polling places being seen as attractive targets for lone wolf type of attacks by individuals motivated by violent extremist ideologies such as sovereign citizens. [02:54.000 --> 03:04.000] This is Brooke Rhodey with your Lowdown for November 4th, 2016. [03:24.000 --> 03:39.000] Somebody blew up a building, somebody stole a car, somebody got away, somebody didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far. [03:39.000 --> 04:01.000] Brad Paffey told my Paffey back in my day, son, a man has an answer for the wicked thing he done. He'll take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them bad boys, hang them high on the street, for all the people to see. [04:01.000 --> 04:09.000] That justice is one thing you should always find, you've got to settle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line. [04:09.000 --> 04:17.000] When the gun smoke settles, we'll sing a victory tune and we'll all be back at the horse and moose. [04:17.000 --> 04:33.000] We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing, whiskey for my men, beer for my horses. [04:33.000 --> 04:48.000] We've got too many gangsters doing dirty things, too much corruption. [04:48.000 --> 05:03.000] We're coming up on Turkey Day at a rapid rate. Everybody get your belts loosened up, your pants enlarged and your appetites on so you can claim how much you can eat and how miserable you are after you're finished. [05:03.000 --> 05:15.000] Sounds a whole lot like an election cycle, doesn't it? All this hyperbole before we start, or hyperbole, or however you want to say the word, and then when it's all over, you sit around feeling miserable about it. [05:15.000 --> 05:23.000] Let's see how that goes this year. All right, an update on the upcoming movie. [05:23.000 --> 05:32.000] It seems they have changed the direction of the movie. Originally they wanted to get it out before the elections and it was going to have a lot of stuff dealing with the elections in it, [05:32.000 --> 05:44.000] but they determined that that would give it not only too short of a shelf life but also too short of an attention span by the American public, and I completely agree with that concept. [05:44.000 --> 06:01.000] So what we have to look at now is what they've changed it to. Right now they have redirected the editing of the movie more toward the corruption and information on solutions mode of delivery. [06:01.000 --> 06:19.000] So with that they have refocused some of the video editing to some of the other stuff that we shot dealing with specific issues that we have here in America and the specific concepts and solutions that we've suggested or thought might work and so on and so forth. [06:19.000 --> 06:28.000] Now there's something that I would like to point out to the people that are out there, whether you be someone that appreciates the show or someone that dislikes the show, [06:28.000 --> 06:34.000] and me personally, which personally I don't really care about, but that's your choice. [06:34.000 --> 06:49.000] Anybody that runs for a public office or gets on a radio or a TV and tells you that they have the only solution that will solve the problem, that's somebody that should be avoided at all costs. [06:49.000 --> 07:03.000] I make lots of suggestions on how to do things, and I say it with certainty that this would solve the problem, but I don't say it's the only way to solve the problem unless we are at a point where there is no going back to any other solution. [07:03.000 --> 07:10.000] Right now we don't have that limitation in most of the things, but we do have it in some. [07:10.000 --> 07:21.000] Right now there's no way we're going to regain our liberties from those that have taken it through the system as it exists. [07:21.000 --> 07:23.000] Not going to happen. [07:23.000 --> 07:31.000] We will never regain what is rightfully ours using the system that is currently in place. [07:31.000 --> 07:40.000] The courts will not do their job. The prosecutors will not do their job. The public servants will not do their jobs. [07:40.000 --> 08:02.000] It is now, no doubt, them against us in every category you can imagine. Instead of having three independent branches and departments of government, we now have a unified force against the people and their rights, liberty, and property for the sake of government. [08:02.000 --> 08:09.000] We will not get that back through the current system. [08:09.000 --> 08:18.000] Now, I hate the only possibility that may be left to us. You can't talk sense to those that have none. [08:18.000 --> 08:23.000] You can't talk reason to those that have no clue how to use it or what it even means. [08:23.000 --> 08:32.000] And you cannot talk anything at all to someone who has a closed mind about what's what and how it works. [08:32.000 --> 09:01.000] And right now, there is, you can count on one hand the number of people in any public office anywhere that fully understands that the rights of the people are absolute and can only be taken away, which I know it abrogates the absolute part, but absolute until this particular point, and that is that they use the exercise of those rights to cause injury to another. [09:01.000 --> 09:20.000] Until that point, no one, no one has the power and the authority legitimately to tell me what I can and cannot do or to take something from me because I did it. [09:20.000 --> 09:23.000] Period. [09:23.000 --> 09:31.000] And the same thing applies to you. But the problem is there are too many people that want to be told what to do. [09:31.000 --> 09:44.000] They want to be treated and taken care of like an inept child, as long as the rest of us are responsible for doing it. [09:44.000 --> 09:51.000] Well, I don't want to take care of you. I have a hard enough time taking care of me and the crap y'all got us embroiled in right now. [09:51.000 --> 09:56.000] I don't want to take care of you. I want to take care of me and what's mine. [09:56.000 --> 10:02.000] As little as I have, it's still mine. [10:02.000 --> 10:13.000] And the fact is, if I want to use it, sell it, burn it, that's my right to do and nobody has a right to tell me that I can't. [10:13.000 --> 10:27.000] So when we have this system in place that is taking all of our rights and liberties away from us and exchanging it for privileges that they can dictate when and where and how we can exercise them, we're no longer a free people. [10:27.000 --> 10:38.000] And anyone that is supporting that is not someone that is going to see their way to supplying you with a remedy in the system as it exists. [10:38.000 --> 10:50.000] Because they fully believe that the system is legitimate and that it's behaving correctly and it's not. [10:50.000 --> 11:00.000] I mean, when we talk about statists and liberals, I did a meme for this for the radio show tonight. [11:00.000 --> 11:14.000] It's a picture of a young chimpanzee puckered up with his lipstick and three inches out in front of his face. And the meme says this is how liberals and statists approach the butt of a government employee. [11:14.000 --> 11:17.000] And it's pretty much the way it is. [11:17.000 --> 11:33.000] When you are more willing to kiss the butt of government than to honor the Constitution and the individual rights of the people, whether you disagree with them or not, you are not someone that should have the power to dictate anything to anyone. [11:33.000 --> 11:44.000] Because you are not operating on an individual rights concept, you are operating on the idea that you have the right to control someone else's actions and life concept. [11:44.000 --> 11:49.000] And you don't. [11:49.000 --> 11:55.000] Now we can discuss this till the cows come home and there are going to be those that get it and there are going to be those that don't. [11:55.000 --> 12:01.000] The problem is, is too many of these people running things are the ones that don't. [12:01.000 --> 12:15.000] Now, we have potentially a new president that there are so many people think he's going to solve all these problems, but no one's paid attention to what he said he's going to do versus whether or not he actually has the authority to do any of it. [12:15.000 --> 12:21.000] And most of the things that he said he's going to do, he alone has no power to do. [12:21.000 --> 12:23.000] Period. [12:23.000 --> 12:31.000] Just like Obama didn't, just like Clinton didn't, they didn't have the power to do those things on their own and they never will. [12:31.000 --> 12:45.000] But that don't mean that they can't bribe and lobby Congress and the other lawmakers to help them get it done, which tells you once again that they are cooperating against your best interest for their own ends. [12:45.000 --> 12:54.000] Now, I for one would love to be completely surprised by this new president and he actually does things the constitutional way. [12:54.000 --> 12:59.000] But the problem we have is he's already shown he doesn't know what that is. [12:59.000 --> 13:10.000] I don't dislike Donald Trump, but I sure as hell don't trust him any more than I trust any of the rest of them that's held that office in the last 120 years. [13:10.000 --> 13:17.000] As the old saying goes, the last honest president this country ever had was Andrew Jackson. [13:17.000 --> 13:18.000] Okay? [13:18.000 --> 13:23.000] And his biggest accomplishment for the benefit of the people was he destroyed the centralized banks. [13:23.000 --> 13:28.000] You know, I was doing some studying on the previous version of the Texas Constitution today. [13:28.000 --> 13:54.000] And do you know every single prior Constitution from the 1824 all the way through the 1865 absolutely forbade the existence of banks and any corporation that operated for the purpose of lending or collecting money? [13:54.000 --> 14:04.000] You get that? The Texas Constitution forbade the existence of those types of corporations and banks. [14:04.000 --> 14:15.000] It even did so after we became a member of the union, allegedly. [14:15.000 --> 14:26.000] So all of the common sense things that the Texas Constitution had in it have been destroyed by each new iteration of government that we've had. [14:26.000 --> 14:32.000] We can't get the government to obey the Constitution that's in place now, much less the Constitution that existed prior to that. [14:32.000 --> 14:41.000] The major difference was that when we used to have a politician that did things that he shouldn't be doing, he was tarred and feathered and ran out of town on a rail. [14:41.000 --> 14:50.000] He wasn't given the opportunity to keep stealing, to keep doing it wrong, to keep profiteering from his illegal acts at our expense. [14:50.000 --> 15:07.000] And yet today, they are fully protected in their criminality by the laws they write and demand that we follow, even while they ignore them. [15:07.000 --> 15:20.000] For instance, these new so-called laws making any resistance or assault upon an officer, a police officer, a hate crime, [15:20.000 --> 15:28.000] what do you call that if you are not calling that an unequal application and protection of the law, something the Constitution forbids? [15:28.000 --> 15:42.000] Yet here they are making a special class of protections for a special class of people that benefits government while harming the people. [15:42.000 --> 15:46.000] And we just sit back and support that. [15:46.000 --> 15:49.000] And of course, there are plenty of people out there that do support that. [15:49.000 --> 15:54.000] They support the police no matter what they do. [15:54.000 --> 16:00.000] There are those that support what the government does no matter what they do. [16:00.000 --> 16:09.000] And almost always, it's someone that does this supporting that has no real clue about what's actually happening. [16:09.000 --> 16:11.000] They have no clue. [16:11.000 --> 16:20.000] I've talked to people that do all kinds of, you know, financial organization and all this kind of things for people, [16:20.000 --> 16:28.000] teaching them how to set up their money and all this kind of stuff who absolutely believe that the Federal Reserve is a part of the federal government, [16:28.000 --> 16:31.000] when in fact it absolutely is not. [16:31.000 --> 16:40.000] It is an absolutely private bank that has seized control of our monetary system unconstitutionally [16:40.000 --> 16:47.000] with the consent of our own Congress who should know that it was completely unconstitutional. [16:47.000 --> 16:50.000] And you still think they're up there working for you. [16:50.000 --> 16:53.000] Come on, folks, wake up. [16:53.000 --> 16:55.000] All right, we'll be right back after this break. [16:55.000 --> 17:18.000] Y'all hang in there. [17:25.000 --> 17:50.000] We'll be right back. [17:55.000 --> 18:22.000] We'll be right back. [18:22.000 --> 18:39.000] We'll be right back. [18:39.000 --> 19:03.000] We'll be right back. [19:03.000 --> 19:29.000] All right, folks, we are back. [19:29.000 --> 19:35.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984. [19:35.000 --> 19:37.000] I've got the phones on now. [19:37.000 --> 19:42.000] And while we're waiting on callers, I'm going to go ahead and finish up on this conversation here. [19:42.000 --> 19:52.000] Now, each and every time we have an election cycle, how many of these candidates run on a platform of ending the Federal Reserve, [19:52.000 --> 19:55.000] which they can legitimately do as members of Congress? [19:55.000 --> 20:03.000] How many of them run on a platform of reestablishing the gold and silver standard as the only viable money [20:03.000 --> 20:11.000] and removing and nullifying all debts incurred by the Federal Reserve unconstitutionally and illegally [20:11.000 --> 20:16.000] and the theft of all of our private property in return? [20:16.000 --> 20:24.000] Any one of these congressmen could and should run on that platform, but none of them ever do. [20:24.000 --> 20:26.000] No presidential candidate. [20:26.000 --> 20:31.000] The only one that ever did that was Ron Paul. [20:31.000 --> 20:34.000] So why aren't they the ones getting elected? [20:34.000 --> 20:37.000] For the same reasons that we aren't electing them. [20:37.000 --> 20:42.000] Too many stupid people and too many corrupt elections. [20:42.000 --> 20:48.000] You think the system is going to allow someone up there that's going to dismantle that system? [20:48.000 --> 20:52.000] Absolutely not. [20:52.000 --> 21:05.000] Okay, that's why I have no faith in any of these candidates that get elected to these offices, including our new so-called president. [21:05.000 --> 21:16.000] I mean, let's imagine for one second that he manages to begin to do the things that he says or that he should do and pushes to get it done. [21:16.000 --> 21:22.000] Does anyone recall what happened to the last president that did that? [21:22.000 --> 21:27.000] Sometime I'd say, oh, 1963? [21:27.000 --> 21:31.000] Anybody recall what happened in 1963? [21:31.000 --> 21:33.000] What was he going to do? [21:33.000 --> 21:36.000] He was going to put us back on the gold and silver standard. [21:36.000 --> 21:39.000] He was going to make the United States print its own currency. [21:39.000 --> 21:43.000] He was going to end the Federal Reserve. [21:43.000 --> 21:51.000] And he's dead, headshot, in Dallas. [21:51.000 --> 22:04.000] Believe me, these people are not going to operate for our best interest because there's nowhere they could hide from those that do not have our interest at heart. [22:04.000 --> 22:06.000] There's no amount of secret service. [22:06.000 --> 22:13.000] There's no one that can protect them if they're not willing to play the game. [22:13.000 --> 22:24.000] The only thing that would protect them is to turn the rest of us loose to lynch these sons of a guns in the middle of the town square tomorrow. [22:24.000 --> 22:31.000] Grab every one of them up out of their beds in the middle of the night and lynch them in the town square. [22:31.000 --> 22:33.000] There's no doubt they're criminals. [22:33.000 --> 22:34.000] There's no doubt. [22:34.000 --> 22:38.000] They've stolen everything they've gotten illegally, unconstitutionally. [22:38.000 --> 22:43.000] Well, I shouldn't say illegally because they wrote the laws to make their theft legal. [22:43.000 --> 22:46.000] That's the thing, you see. [22:46.000 --> 22:53.000] They created laws that made all of their criminal acts legal. [22:53.000 --> 22:59.000] You know, who else do we know in history that did the exact same thing to make all of his actions legal? [22:59.000 --> 23:02.000] Hitler? [23:02.000 --> 23:12.000] He had all of his German attorneys rewrite the laws and get them reenacted after he was elected [23:12.000 --> 23:20.000] and put them into place so that everything he did was legal. [23:20.000 --> 23:25.000] Right now we have laws in this country that should not be in existence. [23:25.000 --> 23:28.000] Not in this country. [23:28.000 --> 23:38.000] We are being as a people subjected to administrative laws by a state that is not required to prove that we ever [23:38.000 --> 23:46.000] voluntarily agreed to participate in that regulated activity that they're talking about. [23:46.000 --> 23:53.000] See, this is the thing about things like transportation and all this other stuff that are in these regulatory codes. [23:53.000 --> 23:59.000] If the state is going to accuse you of an offense under some regulated activity, [23:59.000 --> 24:03.000] some regulated administrative activity, [24:03.000 --> 24:08.000] then the state bears the burden of proving that you were engaging in that activity. [24:08.000 --> 24:11.000] And in order to prove it, they must first allege it. [24:11.000 --> 24:15.000] They never do that. [24:15.000 --> 24:17.000] It's just like what we did in class yesterday. [24:17.000 --> 24:27.000] What the state at every level in every state has done is they have created the presumption of guilt over the omitted elements. [24:27.000 --> 24:34.000] The reason they don't put transportation as an element required to be alleged and proven in the complaint [24:34.000 --> 24:37.000] is because one, if they do put it in there, they must prove it. [24:37.000 --> 24:45.000] But if they simply presume it to be true, rather than putting it into the charging instrument, [24:45.000 --> 24:48.000] they don't have to prove it. [24:48.000 --> 24:53.000] But what's the due process violation associated with such an act? [24:53.000 --> 24:56.000] It is a denial of the presumption of innocence. [24:56.000 --> 25:03.000] Because as an accused in a criminal case, you have the right to be presumed innocent of every single element of the offense. [25:03.000 --> 25:12.000] And the state is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt every single element of the offense. [25:12.000 --> 25:16.000] But they don't allege every single element of the offense. [25:16.000 --> 25:28.000] Therefore, they do not prove every single element of the offense and still find you guilty. [25:28.000 --> 25:34.000] And you think that you're getting justice. [25:34.000 --> 25:42.000] You think that paying and going home is the best way to handle this rather than fighting it. [25:42.000 --> 25:46.000] And this is how the system survives. [25:46.000 --> 25:52.000] If it can generate 10 times as many people willing to pay as it can those willing to fight, [25:52.000 --> 25:57.000] then it has the money to let you fight. [25:57.000 --> 26:09.000] But if everybody fought every ticket, every time, this system would go bankrupt overnight. [26:09.000 --> 26:19.000] Because they could never hope to recoup the money that it costs them in the fines. [26:19.000 --> 26:26.000] Now, of course, this brings us to the other illegitimate things they do in relation to these administrative codes. [26:26.000 --> 26:33.000] And this alone should prove that the code is unconstitutional and that the application of the laws themselves are unconstitutional. [26:33.000 --> 26:39.000] Let's talk for a second about the administrative surcharges and things like the Texas Transportation Code, [26:39.000 --> 26:49.000] where the Department of Public Safety sets surcharges on these fines for particular offenses like driving while license is valid, [26:49.000 --> 26:51.000] no proof of financial responsibility. [26:51.000 --> 26:59.000] They tack surcharges onto this after you have gone to court and been found guilty. [26:59.000 --> 27:01.000] Now, what's the problem here? [27:01.000 --> 27:12.000] This is an administrative punishment for which there has been no jury trial, no bench trial, and no judicial review of said punishment. [27:12.000 --> 27:14.000] That makes it a bill of pains and penalties. [27:14.000 --> 27:17.000] It's unconstitutional on its face. [27:17.000 --> 27:21.000] The surcharges are absolutely unconstitutional. [27:21.000 --> 27:25.000] If they were going to be even remotely constitutional, [27:25.000 --> 27:32.000] they must be proven as something that the jury can decide whether or not the individual has to pay, [27:32.000 --> 27:38.000] just like any other part of the judgment. [27:38.000 --> 27:40.000] But they don't. [27:40.000 --> 27:47.000] This is something the state tacks on behind the scenes after the fact with no review of the action. [27:47.000 --> 27:55.000] It is a monetary punishment outside of the court system. [27:55.000 --> 28:02.000] That is the epitome of an unconstitutional bill of pains and penalties. [28:02.000 --> 28:08.000] It's a legislative determination and an administrative punishment. [28:08.000 --> 28:11.000] The legislature authorized it. [28:11.000 --> 28:18.000] And the agency, in this case the Department of Public Safety, administers the program that takes it [28:18.000 --> 28:23.000] or denies you the privilege associated with the activity to which the surcharge applies, [28:23.000 --> 28:31.000] which in this case is having a driver's license if you're going to engage in commercial use of the highway. [28:31.000 --> 28:35.000] Everything about this system is unconstitutional. [28:35.000 --> 28:38.000] It is legitimized theft. [28:38.000 --> 28:43.000] It is legalized theft, fraud, extortion. [28:43.000 --> 28:45.000] Starting to ring a bell yet? [28:45.000 --> 28:54.000] Take all of these things, make a law that says it's okay, and now what would otherwise be a crime becomes legal. [28:54.000 --> 28:57.000] And who do we have to thank for this? [28:57.000 --> 29:04.000] We go full circle all the way back to the exact same group of people every single time. [29:04.000 --> 29:12.000] We discuss these problems, the attorneys, the bar associations, okay, [29:12.000 --> 29:19.000] the parasites of American society that have claimed a special benefit for themselves [29:19.000 --> 29:32.000] at the absolute destruction of our rights, our property, and the American way of life for their own greed and profit. [29:32.000 --> 29:34.000] Period. [29:34.000 --> 29:38.000] I don't care how many of them say, well, look at all the cases I did pro bono. [29:38.000 --> 29:40.000] Look at all the stuff that I did. [29:40.000 --> 29:45.000] The problem is, folks, you know the system is corrupt. [29:45.000 --> 29:48.000] You shouldn't be fighting to support it or to work in it. [29:48.000 --> 29:52.000] You should be fighting to take it down right along with the rest of it. [29:52.000 --> 29:57.000] But you're not because the benefit to your own pocket is too great. [29:57.000 --> 30:03.000] All right, folks, we'll be right back. Hang on. [30:03.000 --> 30:04.000] Are you going bald? [30:04.000 --> 30:07.000] Don't worry, I'm not peddling another miracle product, [30:07.000 --> 30:11.000] but scientists may have stumbled on a legitimate cure for hair loss. [30:11.000 --> 30:12.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [30:12.000 --> 30:15.000] In a moment, I'll come back and tell you what it is. [30:15.000 --> 30:17.000] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.000 --> 30:21.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:21.000 --> 30:26.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:26.000 --> 30:31.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [30:31.000 --> 30:34.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:34.000 --> 30:37.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [30:37.000 --> 30:41.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:41.000 --> 30:45.000] Start over with Startpage. [30:45.000 --> 30:48.000] Treating baldness is a $1 billion a year industry. [30:48.000 --> 30:52.000] Yet despite all that money, there are only a few legitimate medications that work, [30:52.000 --> 30:55.000] and none actually cures baldness. [30:55.000 --> 30:58.000] During a recent study on how stress affects our intestines, [30:58.000 --> 31:04.000] UCLA researchers identified a chemical compound that could end hair loss and even regrow hair. [31:04.000 --> 31:09.000] The compound A, stress, and B blocks a hormone that our bodies produce when we're under stress. [31:09.000 --> 31:12.000] Mice that received the stress hormone and lost their hair [31:12.000 --> 31:15.000] were later injected with A, stress, and B for five days. [31:15.000 --> 31:20.000] In less than three months, all of the mice re-grew all of their hair. [31:20.000 --> 31:22.000] Hair club for men, look out. [31:22.000 --> 31:27.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:52.000 --> 31:55.000] Ten products that save you space, time, and money. [31:55.000 --> 32:02.000] Call 888-910-4367 only at NUSA.org. [32:02.000 --> 32:05.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [32:05.000 --> 32:08.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, [32:08.000 --> 32:10.000] and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [32:10.000 --> 32:13.000] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:13.000 --> 32:16.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [32:16.000 --> 32:20.000] the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:20.000 --> 32:22.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity [32:22.000 --> 32:25.000] to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:25.000 --> 32:28.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:28.000 --> 32:31.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [32:31.000 --> 32:33.000] that will help you understand what due process is [32:33.000 --> 32:35.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:35.000 --> 32:37.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material [32:37.000 --> 32:40.000] by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:40.000 --> 32:42.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, [32:42.000 --> 32:45.000] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [32:45.000 --> 32:47.000] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [32:47.000 --> 32:50.000] hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:50.000 --> 32:54.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:54.000 --> 33:02.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:02.000 --> 33:14.000] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:14.000 --> 33:20.000] Yeah, I got a warrant, and I gonna solve them, [33:20.000 --> 33:25.000] to the head government them, prosecute them. [33:25.000 --> 33:29.000] Okay. [33:29.000 --> 33:32.000] All set. [33:32.000 --> 33:37.000] This isn't a race for me to push. [33:37.000 --> 33:41.000] This isn't a race for the teen. [33:41.000 --> 33:44.000] Well, I need a prosecutor. [33:44.000 --> 33:51.000] All right, folks, we are back, Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984, [33:51.000 --> 33:54.000] and we're gonna start taking your calls now, [33:54.000 --> 33:57.000] and looks like the first up is Truth Raider. [33:57.000 --> 34:00.000] Raider, what can I do for you? [34:00.000 --> 34:02.000] Tonight, Eddie, it's the other way around. [34:02.000 --> 34:06.000] What can I do for Eddie and the listeners? [34:06.000 --> 34:10.000] Sending me a winning lottery ticket would be good. [34:10.000 --> 34:12.000] Well, let's see. [34:12.000 --> 34:17.000] I could dance on the tip of a needle. [34:17.000 --> 34:20.000] I'm not really sure what benefit that would serve, [34:20.000 --> 34:24.000] unless you fell down in a completely funny way. [34:24.000 --> 34:30.000] Hey, folks out there, get yourself a good CD, a blank CD, and if you can, [34:30.000 --> 34:34.000] for the folks out there who have the seminar material, [34:34.000 --> 34:38.000] take it and see if you can burn it down on a CD. [34:38.000 --> 34:42.000] Put it in the player of your conveyance, [34:42.000 --> 34:47.000] and when you go out and about in your liberties for business or pleasure [34:47.000 --> 34:50.000] or for whatever private activities you want to do, [34:50.000 --> 34:54.000] play the seminar material in your car. [34:54.000 --> 34:57.000] Make sure you're listening to that as you go out each and every time. [34:57.000 --> 35:00.000] What I did is when I went down to the class back in June, [35:00.000 --> 35:04.000] I recorded the class that he had on a particular day back in June, [35:04.000 --> 35:07.000] and it's quite comical and it's got a lot of pejoratives and stuff [35:07.000 --> 35:10.000] and a lot of language, but it was very entertaining, [35:10.000 --> 35:15.000] and it was specifically, a lot of it had to do with what to do [35:15.000 --> 35:19.000] in the case you get traffic stops and things to handle. [35:19.000 --> 35:25.000] So it's an idea for you folks out there to not so much indoctrinate, [35:25.000 --> 35:29.000] but be able to listen to all the shows that Eddie's put out, [35:29.000 --> 35:33.000] the seminar material, and information if you can possibly even somehow [35:33.000 --> 35:36.000] be able to get the show if you don't have it on radio, [35:36.000 --> 35:39.000] but if you can listen to the show on the radio, [35:39.000 --> 35:43.000] record it wherever you can and play it when you're out in the field. [35:43.000 --> 35:46.000] It's just another way of being able to get the information [35:46.000 --> 35:49.000] and ingraining it in your minds. [35:49.000 --> 35:52.000] And that's just an idea that I wanted to pass to the listeners out there [35:52.000 --> 35:54.000] and to you, Eddie, and what do you think about that? [35:54.000 --> 35:56.000] It sounds like a good idea. [35:56.000 --> 36:00.000] Well, if you're talking about the audio of the seminar, yes. [36:00.000 --> 36:02.000] Yeah, yeah, absolutely. [36:02.000 --> 36:03.000] That's what I'm doing. [36:03.000 --> 36:07.000] Any time I go out, I get a little additional boosters, speaker, [36:07.000 --> 36:10.000] connect the player that I have of the class, [36:10.000 --> 36:13.000] and I listen to all the segments when I go out each and every time. [36:13.000 --> 36:15.000] And if I happen to get stops, I say, hey, there's my counselor right there. [36:15.000 --> 36:17.000] I'll put you a PA system on top [36:17.000 --> 36:20.000] and drive through the middle of town while you're doing it. [36:20.000 --> 36:22.000] Yeah, that's another idea. [36:22.000 --> 36:23.000] Yeah, I might do that. [36:23.000 --> 36:25.000] That's even better. [36:25.000 --> 36:28.000] Okay, I've got one question tonight, and it was concerning the class. [36:28.000 --> 36:30.000] It was a subject you were talking about. [36:30.000 --> 36:34.000] And I didn't get a very good recording of what you were talking about, [36:34.000 --> 36:38.000] and I think what happened was the phone caught out every 10 minutes [36:38.000 --> 36:41.000] because it has a certain maximum amount of time you can record, [36:41.000 --> 36:44.000] so I had to keep hitting the re-record button every time [36:44.000 --> 36:46.000] after about each 10-minute segment. [36:46.000 --> 36:50.000] So the question is, you were speaking about ownership [36:50.000 --> 36:54.000] and how that's a man-made, created fiction. [36:54.000 --> 36:56.000] Can you kind of just rehash over that again, [36:56.000 --> 37:00.000] what fiction there is to being an owner [37:00.000 --> 37:03.000] and what the definition of ownership is? [37:03.000 --> 37:10.000] Well, the difference there is between legal ownership and equity ownership. [37:10.000 --> 37:13.000] Legal ownership is the right of use and possession, [37:13.000 --> 37:17.000] but not of disposition or transference, [37:17.000 --> 37:22.000] whereas equity owner is everything of any interest in the property, [37:22.000 --> 37:27.000] even to the point of destroying that property. [37:27.000 --> 37:30.000] It's a completely different type of ownership. [37:30.000 --> 37:38.000] Deed property is legal ownership, not equity ownership. [37:38.000 --> 37:43.000] Most deeds, in fact, at least I've seen several here in Texas where that's the case, [37:43.000 --> 37:47.000] if you go look at the deed for your land or your house or whatever, [37:47.000 --> 37:56.000] you will find generally on the deed that you are listed as the tenant, not the owner. [37:56.000 --> 38:01.000] Yeah, I was worrying about that because I get calls frequently [38:01.000 --> 38:03.000] saying would I be interested in selling my house? [38:03.000 --> 38:06.000] Well, one thing, I don't own my house, [38:06.000 --> 38:10.000] and my landlord is not interested in selling. [38:10.000 --> 38:15.000] Well, the only other thing is even if it does say owner, you still have to ask the question, [38:15.000 --> 38:19.000] are you talking legal owner or equity owner? [38:19.000 --> 38:25.000] But here I've actually seen deeds that said the person named on it was the tenant, not the owner, [38:25.000 --> 38:28.000] even though that person thought they were the owner. [38:28.000 --> 38:33.000] They're not, they're a tenant according to the deed, [38:33.000 --> 38:37.000] which means that they're in a commercial property that the state can tax [38:37.000 --> 38:41.000] because it's being used for the production of income as the state sees it, [38:41.000 --> 38:46.000] not income that's taxable per se at the federal level, but income as far as making it [38:46.000 --> 38:49.000] for commercial purposes and renting it to the public. [38:49.000 --> 38:55.000] So they list you as a tenant and it becomes commercial property for their tax rolls. [38:55.000 --> 38:56.000] Right. [38:56.000 --> 38:57.000] Okay. [38:57.000 --> 39:02.000] If they list you as the legal owner, then it's still the same thing as a tenant. [39:02.000 --> 39:04.000] You don't own the property. [39:04.000 --> 39:10.000] You just have the right of possession and use just like a tenant. [39:10.000 --> 39:11.000] All right. [39:11.000 --> 39:15.000] I'll let you look a little bit more deep into that. [39:15.000 --> 39:17.000] And that's basically all I got tonight. [39:17.000 --> 39:18.000] Okay. [39:18.000 --> 39:20.000] That idea I wanted to throw out there for everyone. [39:20.000 --> 39:21.000] All right. [39:21.000 --> 39:22.000] Thanks for calling in, Raider. [39:22.000 --> 39:23.000] You bet. [39:23.000 --> 39:26.000] I'll let you know what's going on with the lawsuit as I'm trying to put that together. [39:26.000 --> 39:31.000] It's going to be quite a project for a while to get everything correct and do it right. [39:31.000 --> 39:32.000] Okay. [39:32.000 --> 39:33.000] Good luck. [39:33.000 --> 39:34.000] All right. [39:34.000 --> 39:35.000] God bless. [39:35.000 --> 39:36.000] Happy Thanksgiving and holidays as well. [39:36.000 --> 39:37.000] Thank you too. [39:37.000 --> 39:38.000] Bye-bye. [39:38.000 --> 39:39.000] Bye-bye. [39:39.000 --> 39:40.000] All right. [39:40.000 --> 39:44.000] Now we're going to Reb McGrath. [39:44.000 --> 39:47.000] Hello? [39:47.000 --> 39:50.000] Hello? [39:50.000 --> 39:55.000] Reb McGrath. [39:55.000 --> 39:59.000] Well, I had a sound and then they sound like they hung up. [39:59.000 --> 40:00.000] All right. [40:00.000 --> 40:03.000] So let's go to Charles in Washington. [40:03.000 --> 40:06.000] Charles, what can we do for you? [40:06.000 --> 40:07.000] Hey, I have two questions for you. [40:07.000 --> 40:11.000] I'm just interested about what the gentleman was talking about, the ownership. [40:11.000 --> 40:17.000] On a radio broadcast some time back, maybe about a month ago, there was a gentleman asking [40:17.000 --> 40:19.000] about the taxing of property. [40:19.000 --> 40:23.000] And I was told that we shouldn't be paying tax on our property. [40:23.000 --> 40:29.000] But then, as he was just asking you a question about the legal and the equity, my house was [40:29.000 --> 40:33.000] paid off and I didn't get the ownership paperwork. [40:33.000 --> 40:35.000] I guess they claim they keep it. [40:35.000 --> 40:40.000] And what he was just talking about, is that basically because they're holding my title [40:40.000 --> 40:43.000] as me as a tenant? [40:43.000 --> 40:48.000] No, because your mortgage has been collateralized in one of those funny money packages they [40:48.000 --> 40:50.000] sold off to investors. [40:50.000 --> 40:54.000] You will never, ever see the mortgage on your house again, which means that any time in [40:54.000 --> 41:01.000] the near or distant future, some jerk-off can show up, mortgage in hand, and say you [41:01.000 --> 41:04.000] owe him the full balance listed on that mortgage and you've never paid him a dime. [41:04.000 --> 41:09.000] And then foreclose on your house and take it away. [41:09.000 --> 41:13.000] See, you remember back ever hearing in the old days about this thing called a mortgage [41:13.000 --> 41:16.000] burning party? [41:16.000 --> 41:19.000] People used to have those when they paid off their mortgage. [41:19.000 --> 41:24.000] The reason they had them was that once that mortgage was paid, that mortgage had to be [41:24.000 --> 41:27.000] turned over to that new homeowner. [41:27.000 --> 41:29.000] Okay? [41:29.000 --> 41:35.000] The first thing they did with that mortgage was burn it so no one could ever come back [41:35.000 --> 41:42.000] mortgage in hand and say they own that property. [41:42.000 --> 41:46.000] But right now, the way they've got all these things packaged up and all these investment [41:46.000 --> 41:51.000] schemes for these people, that mortgage, there's no telling who actually has their hands on [41:51.000 --> 41:52.000] it. [41:52.000 --> 41:58.000] That's why no one can legitimately say they have the right to collect on the mortgage. [41:58.000 --> 42:03.000] But someone shows up with that physical mortgage in their hand and they're going to be able [42:03.000 --> 42:06.000] to take that house right out from under you. [42:06.000 --> 42:07.000] Okay. [42:07.000 --> 42:11.000] So now in saying that, now I'm going to go to the equity part. [42:11.000 --> 42:16.000] My son-in-law buys himself property and I mentioned this somewhat to him and he said [42:16.000 --> 42:20.000] something about I need to put my house into a trust. [42:20.000 --> 42:22.000] It ain't going to make any difference. [42:22.000 --> 42:27.000] You cannot put the house in a trust until you can prove that you own it. [42:27.000 --> 42:34.000] You can't prove that you own it until you can show that you've got the mortgage on it. [42:34.000 --> 42:37.000] Even though I paid the bank off. [42:37.000 --> 42:38.000] Okay. [42:38.000 --> 42:40.000] That's interesting. [42:40.000 --> 42:41.000] All right. [42:41.000 --> 42:45.000] That's something I really look into because I did count the end of that a few times. [42:45.000 --> 42:49.000] I did try to call you and I wasn't able to get in, but I heard the gentleman talk. [42:49.000 --> 42:50.000] Okay. [42:50.000 --> 42:52.000] Well, now to get back to my issue. [42:52.000 --> 42:55.000] You know, I was the guy that had the car that kept getting impounded and you told me why [42:55.000 --> 42:56.000] am I going to court? [42:56.000 --> 42:57.000] Well, I quit going to court. [42:57.000 --> 43:02.000] Now I figured out for the most part from the information that you sent me and other information [43:02.000 --> 43:10.000] that I did do my homework on to start taking a stuff, filing a lawsuit against the state. [43:10.000 --> 43:12.000] I saw that process. [43:12.000 --> 43:13.000] Wait a minute. [43:13.000 --> 43:16.000] Was the state the one taking the car? [43:16.000 --> 43:20.000] Yes, because it was the parking enforcement who came out. [43:20.000 --> 43:22.000] Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. [43:22.000 --> 43:28.000] Does parking enforcement work for the state or do they work for the municipality? [43:28.000 --> 43:31.000] Oh God, now you're getting me again on that one. [43:31.000 --> 43:33.000] I'll have to see the municipality then. [43:33.000 --> 43:34.000] That's correct. [43:34.000 --> 43:40.000] That's exactly who they will work for unless it's the county, but it's not the state. [43:40.000 --> 43:42.000] Okay. [43:42.000 --> 43:47.000] And most likely they're operating in the corporate capacity of the municipality, [43:47.000 --> 43:52.000] not its governmental capacity as a political subdivision of the state. [43:52.000 --> 43:55.000] Hang on just a second, Charles, and I'll get to you after the break. [43:55.000 --> 43:56.000] All right, folks, y'all hold on. [43:56.000 --> 44:00.000] We'll return in just a minute. [44:00.000 --> 44:03.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [44:03.000 --> 44:07.000] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, [44:07.000 --> 44:15.000] the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [44:15.000 --> 44:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [44:19.000 --> 44:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [44:23.000 --> 44:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [44:28.000 --> 44:34.000] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:34.000 --> 44:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [44:39.000 --> 44:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:43.000 --> 44:49.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [44:49.000 --> 44:52.000] pro se tactics, and much more. [44:52.000 --> 45:03.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [45:03.000 --> 45:07.000] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, [45:07.000 --> 45:13.000] and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas, [45:13.000 --> 45:19.000] buying Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [45:23.000 --> 45:27.000] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil, [45:27.000 --> 45:31.000] lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [45:31.000 --> 45:38.000] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. [45:38.000 --> 45:44.000] That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. [45:44.000 --> 46:02.000] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com. [46:14.000 --> 46:24.000] All right, folks, we are back. [46:24.000 --> 46:30.000] This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig, and we are talking to Charles in Washington. [46:30.000 --> 46:33.000] All right, Charles, please continue. [46:33.000 --> 46:38.000] Okay, as you were saying, because I'm still new at this, trying to learn the differences. [46:38.000 --> 46:45.000] The parking enforcement, like you said, are operating upon the municipalities, which is corporations, not that of the state. [46:45.000 --> 46:51.000] So that's something I really didn't know, but I would assume that would be municipality, which is not a good assumption, [46:51.000 --> 46:58.000] but I would think that would be municipality because on a couple of the issues I've had that came out like that. [46:58.000 --> 47:01.000] So I need to be following suit against the municipality. [47:01.000 --> 47:09.000] Well, you need – no, no, no, no, no. Depending upon how you do that, you may wind up losing that just because you named the municipality. [47:09.000 --> 47:12.000] At the very least, they're most likely to be able to get out of it. [47:12.000 --> 47:19.000] You need to sue the department itself, whatever that department is under that municipality. [47:19.000 --> 47:28.000] Sue the individual enforcement agents in their private or interpersonal and public capacities. [47:28.000 --> 47:38.000] Okay? But sue the department and then make the municipality respond in a superior to that suit. [47:38.000 --> 47:41.000] Gotcha. Okay. I'm following that. [47:41.000 --> 47:49.000] All right, because I took all that stuff out, like you told me, out of going to the toll hearings, [47:49.000 --> 47:54.000] and then I started taking the pay books and stuff that I found out, and then I started to follow suit. [47:54.000 --> 47:59.000] And then I'm thinking to myself, okay, am I doing the right thing by following suit against the state? [47:59.000 --> 48:05.000] Because when they have a department, I think you go to file your suit case too with the state or whatever. [48:05.000 --> 48:07.000] But then that made me think about that. [48:07.000 --> 48:13.000] In Tacoma, it's the mayor's office and it's the special department that you just mentioned. [48:13.000 --> 48:16.000] You said, so the department that I needed to come after. [48:16.000 --> 48:22.000] So that sort of gave me an idea. I needed to call you to confirm which one is it, which you're telling me now has got to be the department. [48:22.000 --> 48:25.000] It would be that individual parking enforcement officer. [48:25.000 --> 48:30.000] Yeah, their supervisor, et cetera, et cetera. [48:30.000 --> 48:34.000] All right. And I'm on board with you on that one. So I thought it was a good call. [48:34.000 --> 48:39.000] Yeah, I got sort of wounded from talking to you before because I didn't know, and I was going through a lot, [48:39.000 --> 48:42.000] and I thought I was doing the right thing by going to toll hearings. [48:42.000 --> 48:45.000] But you called me, why am I doing that? Because I didn't know no better. [48:45.000 --> 48:49.000] And then I'm starting to think about this. So I've taken a different approach than I was studying it. [48:49.000 --> 48:56.000] Now, the other issue is on your seminars, I don't know if you've covered it because I got your other stuff on what to do, [48:56.000 --> 49:01.000] but I got caught with my parents down. I got a ticket driving in the S.O.V. lane one night. [49:01.000 --> 49:03.000] I'm sorry, you got a ticket doing what? [49:03.000 --> 49:06.000] Driving in the S.O.V. lane. [49:06.000 --> 49:07.000] I'm sorry, doing what? [49:07.000 --> 49:08.000] More lanes. [49:08.000 --> 49:09.000] I'm sorry, doing what? [49:09.000 --> 49:13.000] I'm sorry, yeah, traveling in the S.O.V. lane. [49:13.000 --> 49:19.000] And so when he pulled me over, I read off the script everything that was to be said. [49:19.000 --> 49:21.000] He wasn't trying to hear it, which you know he wasn't. [49:21.000 --> 49:25.000] So I had my window cracked two inches, my door outside locked on the driver's side. [49:25.000 --> 49:32.000] He came around to the other side, the passenger side, and the window would not see the trouble, so it kept going up and down. [49:32.000 --> 49:35.000] So he ended up opening my door and stuck his head in. [49:35.000 --> 49:39.000] And I'm like, damn it, you know, I didn't lock my door. [49:39.000 --> 49:45.000] So then he started asking for my license. I told him I'm traveling, and I do not have to have my vehicle registered on that. [49:45.000 --> 49:47.000] I'm sorry, you don't have to have your what? [49:47.000 --> 49:49.000] You don't have to have your what registered? [49:49.000 --> 49:53.000] I have to have a driver's license, my automobile, my private automobile. [49:53.000 --> 49:55.000] And I did say that at the time. [49:55.000 --> 49:59.000] And he was telling me, no, in the Washington state, it's a law, blah, blah, blah, you know, they always say that. [49:59.000 --> 50:03.000] And it sort of got to be, and I remember you said not to get into an argument with him. [50:03.000 --> 50:09.000] And I said, well, I'm following my civil liability. [50:09.000 --> 50:12.000] I might not have a right to travel without that. [50:12.000 --> 50:17.000] So he asked me for my license and all that, and I told him I don't use it, I don't have it. [50:17.000 --> 50:18.000] I'm traveling. [50:18.000 --> 50:26.000] And so then he proceeded to go back, come back with a ticket for no registration, no license, traveling in the SOV lane. [50:26.000 --> 50:28.000] And that was it. [50:28.000 --> 50:34.000] You know, he charged you with driving, even though that's what you weren't doing. [50:34.000 --> 50:35.000] Yeah. [50:35.000 --> 50:37.000] And that's why I kept saying driving. [50:37.000 --> 50:42.000] And being in the SOV lane, no registration, no license, and all of that, insurance. [50:42.000 --> 50:46.000] So I told him, I said, well, you forgot what I didn't have my seat belt on either. [50:46.000 --> 50:50.000] So at that time, I told him to get the hell out of my car because he took my keys, [50:50.000 --> 50:53.000] talking about where I could take you to jail, which was offensive to me. [50:53.000 --> 50:56.000] And I said, well, it's not a crime I committed driving or traveling. [50:56.000 --> 51:00.000] Well, the thing is, you're in Washington state, right? [51:00.000 --> 51:01.000] Yeah. [51:01.000 --> 51:05.000] All of these are civil infractions, aren't they? [51:05.000 --> 51:06.000] Yes, they are. [51:06.000 --> 51:11.000] Then why did he stop you in the first place? [51:11.000 --> 51:15.000] Because I was traveling in the SOV lane. [51:15.000 --> 51:20.000] Is that a civil infraction or a criminal offense? [51:20.000 --> 51:25.000] That would have been a civil infraction by the state of Washington, but not under my traveling... [51:25.000 --> 51:29.000] Wait a minute. Pay attention to what I'm asking you. [51:29.000 --> 51:41.000] Is the action of traveling in the HOV lane a civil infraction or a criminal offense? [51:41.000 --> 51:43.000] A civil infraction. [51:43.000 --> 51:48.000] Then why did he stop you? [51:48.000 --> 51:50.000] Because it has to be two more people. [51:50.000 --> 51:52.000] Really? [51:52.000 --> 51:55.000] You're kind of still missing the point here, Charles. [51:55.000 --> 52:04.000] When the officer seized you at your liberty by pulling you over, did he have a warrant for your arrest? [52:04.000 --> 52:05.000] No, he didn't. [52:05.000 --> 52:15.000] Then what crime did he witness in order to establish probable cause to make such a detention or arrest? [52:15.000 --> 52:19.000] No crime, okay. So the point is there was no crime committed. [52:19.000 --> 52:24.000] Bingo. Therefore, no warrantless arrest authority exists. [52:24.000 --> 52:31.000] His seizure of your vehicle or your car and your person at the time was illegal [52:31.000 --> 52:38.000] because he could not have had reasonable suspicion or articulable probable cause for a civil infraction [52:38.000 --> 52:46.000] in order to make a warrantless seizure of you and your car. [52:46.000 --> 52:52.000] Thank you, warrantless seizure. Okay, I'm writing it down this time like I should have been on the other times. [52:52.000 --> 52:57.000] Go read the article on my blog dealing with civil infractions. [52:57.000 --> 53:08.000] Down at the bottom of that, there are seven specific interrogatories that you need to file in a motion for discovery. [53:08.000 --> 53:13.000] Seven, a motion of discovery. [53:13.000 --> 53:14.000] Okay. [53:14.000 --> 53:15.000] Okay. [53:15.000 --> 53:21.000] And you use them verbatim. Do not change a word. [53:21.000 --> 53:23.000] Okay. All right. [53:23.000 --> 53:27.000] The only thing you're going to change is where the blank is, where it says, [53:27.000 --> 53:32.000] where you have to put in the name of the particular state, which in this case will be Washington. [53:32.000 --> 53:34.000] The state. The state, that's what I figured. [53:34.000 --> 53:35.000] Okay. [53:35.000 --> 53:37.000] Because I don't have that state with me that was helping out. [53:37.000 --> 53:44.000] Is this under the Tantra law or is this up under the, under the Altai? [53:44.000 --> 53:48.000] No, this is tauoflaw.wordpress.com. [53:48.000 --> 53:54.000] Yeah, tauoflaw.wordpress.com. [53:54.000 --> 54:01.000] .wordpress.com. Okay, that's what I needed to know. [54:01.000 --> 54:06.000] And in this search field, just type civil infractions and it will bring up all the articles. [54:06.000 --> 54:13.000] And the one you want is the one that says civil infractions and what to do if your state uses them or has them. [54:13.000 --> 54:18.000] Okay, if your state uses or has. [54:18.000 --> 54:20.000] Okay, that's what I need to edit. [54:20.000 --> 54:26.000] But those seven interrogatories are very specific to prove that there was no lawful authority [54:26.000 --> 54:32.000] to make a warrantless seizure of an individual or their property for a civil infraction. [54:32.000 --> 54:35.000] No state law can authorize that. [54:35.000 --> 54:41.000] They cannot authorize a warrantless arrest absent probable cause of a crime. [54:41.000 --> 54:47.000] And a civil infraction is not a crime. [54:47.000 --> 54:49.000] Okay, I heard you. [54:49.000 --> 54:50.000] Thank you very much. [54:50.000 --> 54:51.000] Okay. [54:51.000 --> 54:52.000] All right, that's what I needed to know. [54:52.000 --> 54:53.000] I won't hold her up. [54:53.000 --> 54:54.000] I looked that up. [54:54.000 --> 54:56.000] And if I do, Thomas, I got your email address again. [54:56.000 --> 54:57.000] Okay. [54:57.000 --> 54:58.000] Thank you so much. [54:58.000 --> 54:59.000] You're welcome. [54:59.000 --> 55:00.000] Good luck. [55:00.000 --> 55:01.000] I never did. [55:01.000 --> 55:02.000] Thank you. [55:02.000 --> 55:04.000] Never did you get from, what's the guy named, Olivia? [55:04.000 --> 55:05.000] Olivier. [55:05.000 --> 55:06.000] Olivier? [55:06.000 --> 55:10.000] Yeah, I didn't know if you were able to talk with him after you had your trial. [55:10.000 --> 55:15.000] I sent him an email with your information in it, but I haven't gotten anything back from him. [55:15.000 --> 55:19.000] I'm assuming he's a tad bit busy with as many things as he's got going on. [55:19.000 --> 55:20.000] I know he was on one case. [55:20.000 --> 55:21.000] Okay. [55:21.000 --> 55:23.000] I know he was dealing with some things behind the U.S. [55:23.000 --> 55:24.000] Okay. [55:24.000 --> 55:25.000] Well, I appreciate you again. [55:25.000 --> 55:26.000] Thank you so much. [55:26.000 --> 55:27.000] Yes, sir. [55:27.000 --> 55:28.000] Bye-bye. [55:28.000 --> 55:29.000] Bye-bye. [55:29.000 --> 55:30.000] All right. [55:30.000 --> 55:32.000] Now we are going to go to Ron in Texas. [55:32.000 --> 55:37.000] Ron, what can we do for you? [55:37.000 --> 55:40.000] Hello, Ron? [55:40.000 --> 55:41.000] Hey, better. [55:41.000 --> 55:42.000] Hey, better. [55:42.000 --> 55:43.000] Hey, better. [55:43.000 --> 55:44.000] Hey, better. [55:44.000 --> 55:45.000] Hey, better. [55:45.000 --> 55:46.000] Hey, better. [55:46.000 --> 55:47.000] Swing. [55:47.000 --> 55:48.000] Ron? [55:48.000 --> 55:49.000] Can you hear me now? [55:49.000 --> 55:50.000] I can hear you now. [55:50.000 --> 55:51.000] Hey, Eddie. [55:51.000 --> 55:56.000] I got a seatbelt ticket in Houston, riding shotgun, and I didn't do anything about it, [55:56.000 --> 56:03.000] and got a warrant for it, and I was wondering, my question is, I want to fight it, but what's [56:03.000 --> 56:05.000] the best way to go about it? [56:05.000 --> 56:11.000] Well, the first thing is, is what did you do at the stop? [56:11.000 --> 56:15.000] Just showed the driver's license and got a ticket. [56:15.000 --> 56:19.000] You gave him a driver's license even though you weren't driving? [56:19.000 --> 56:20.000] Correct. [56:20.000 --> 56:21.000] Okay. [56:21.000 --> 56:23.000] And you said you were riding shotgun. [56:23.000 --> 56:32.000] So he seized the person who wasn't doing anything to ticket the person who was. [56:32.000 --> 56:34.000] Tell me how that's legitimate. [56:34.000 --> 56:35.000] Here's the problem. [56:35.000 --> 56:40.000] The seatbelt statute in Texas, even if you fight it on merits, is very straightforward. [56:40.000 --> 56:42.000] How old are you? [56:42.000 --> 56:43.000] Thirty-nine. [56:43.000 --> 56:44.000] Okay. [56:44.000 --> 56:47.000] So you're not 15 years of age or younger. [56:47.000 --> 56:48.000] Mm-hmm. [56:48.000 --> 56:51.000] And I'm assuming you were in the front seat. [56:51.000 --> 56:52.000] Yes. [56:52.000 --> 56:53.000] Okay. [56:53.000 --> 56:57.000] That's all the statute in Texas applies to in relation to a seatbelt. [56:57.000 --> 57:09.000] Any passenger in a passenger vehicle that is 15 years of age and younger riding in the front seat has to have a seatbelt on. [57:09.000 --> 57:13.000] But the thing here is, what is a passenger vehicle? [57:13.000 --> 57:21.000] A taxi cab, a shuttle bus, someone that you're paying to take you from point A to point B in that regard. [57:21.000 --> 57:24.000] That's what makes you a passenger. [57:24.000 --> 57:25.000] Okay. [57:25.000 --> 57:33.000] And that's what makes them a passenger vehicle. [57:33.000 --> 57:34.000] All right. [57:34.000 --> 57:38.000] As far as the warrant goes, do I have to go pay? [57:38.000 --> 57:43.000] All you have to do to nullify the warrant is to show up at the court that issued it. [57:43.000 --> 57:47.000] Now be aware that they may not release you. [57:47.000 --> 57:52.000] You should go in there and say, I don't know why you guys issued a warrant for this, [57:52.000 --> 57:56.000] but I need to set this for the court proceedings. [57:56.000 --> 58:02.000] Now they may make you pay a bond before they let you out of there again, [58:02.000 --> 58:13.000] but make darn sure that you make them give you something in writing that whatever you pay is for a bond, not for the fine. [58:13.000 --> 58:18.000] Otherwise, they're just going to steal your money and not give you a trial. [58:18.000 --> 58:22.000] So once I get the new court date, can I file motions at that point? [58:22.000 --> 58:29.000] Yes, because until there is a court date and a court record, there's nothing to file because there's no case created. [58:29.000 --> 58:32.000] There probably is not a case created now. [58:32.000 --> 58:40.000] The thing is, if they issued that warrant without a valid complaint being filed, they've already got a problem. [58:40.000 --> 58:45.000] There is a complaint, one for the ticket and one for the warrant. [58:45.000 --> 58:49.000] Wait a minute, hang on just a second and we'll take this up on the other side. [58:49.000 --> 58:50.000] We'll be right back. [58:50.000 --> 58:58.000] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.000 --> 59:06.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. [59:06.000 --> 59:09.000] Enter the recovery version. [59:09.000 --> 59:13.000] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [59:13.000 --> 59:18.000] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.000 --> 59:22.000] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [59:22.000 --> 59:28.000] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.000 --> 59:33.000] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.000 --> 59:47.000] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:47.000 --> 59:50.000] That's freestudybible.com. [59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, [01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000] providing the jelly bulletins for the commodities market. [01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:20.000] Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [01:00:20.000 --> 01:00:27.000] Markets for Friday, the 4th of November, 2016, are currently trending with gold at $1,304.10 an ounce, [01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:41.000] silver $18.41 an ounce, Texas crude $44.66 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $697 U.S. currency. [01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:48.000] Today in history, the year 1952, the United States government establishes the National Security Agency or NSA, [01:00:48.000 --> 01:00:52.000] an intelligence organization of the United States government responsible for global monitoring, [01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:57.000] collection, and processing of information and data for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes. [01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:04.000] The NSA was established today in history. [01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:10.000] In recent news, WikiLeaks just dumped part 30 of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta's hacked emails, [01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:13.000] bringing the toll thus far to over 47,000. [01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:17.000] Julian Assange, who still is essentially on house arrest at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, [01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:22.000] gave an interview with Russia Today where he claims that the outcome of next Tuesday's presidential election [01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:25.000] between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton has already been decided, [01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:31.000] saying, quote, because he has had every establishment off his side, Trump does not have one establishment, [01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:35.000] maybe with the exception of the evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment. [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:40.000] Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, et cetera, are all united behind Hillary Clinton, [01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:44.000] and the media as well, media owners and the journalists themselves. [01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:48.000] This is days after political activists discovered a hidden website for WRCB, [01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:56.000] an NBC affiliate out of Chattanooga, Tennessee, showing election results with Hillary Clinton securing 343 electoral votes [01:01:56.000 --> 01:01:58.000] and 42 percent of the popular vote. [01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:02.000] Hillary, her campaign, and the media are accusing Russia for the hacking of tens of thousands of emails [01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:04.000] that WikiLeaks has dumped out in the past weeks. [01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:08.000] However, Julian Assange has vehemently denied any involvement from the Kremlin. [01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:13.000] A majority of Hillary's hacked emails that have been released via WikiLeaks since March of 2016 [01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:21.000] can be searched through at WikiLeaks.org forward slash Clinton dash emails. [01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:26.000] CBS News reported earlier today that U.S. intelligence agencies have alerted joint terrorism task forces [01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:32.000] that Al Qaeda could potentially be planning terrorist attacks in New York, Texas, and Virginia for Monday, [01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:35.000] the day before the election, though no specific cities and landmarks are mentioned. [01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:39.000] Counterterrorism spokespersons have stated that as the election day nears, [01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:42.000] federal law enforcement is planning for several worst-case scenarios. [01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:46.000] While earlier this week, an alert warned local police of polling places [01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:50.000] being seen as attractive targets for lone wolf type of attacks by individuals [01:02:50.000 --> 01:02:54.000] motivated by violent extremist ideologies such as sovereign citizens. [01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:19.000] This was Brooke Brody with your Lowdown for November 4th, 2016. [01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:46.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:52.000] This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984. [01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:55.000] And we are talking with Ron in Texas. [01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:58.000] All right, Ron, let's continue on with this. [01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:00.000] Okay. [01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:04.000] Now, where were we? [01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:06.000] Bond. [01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:07.000] Okay. [01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:11.000] If they have you pay the bond, it's going to be twice the amount of what the fine would be [01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:13.000] if you take in a cash bond. [01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:15.000] I don't recommend you do that. [01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:25.000] Do you know two people in the county where you live that have property in that county? [01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:26.000] No. [01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:27.000] Okay. [01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:31.000] Then doing a surety bond is not going to be an option for you. [01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:34.000] The only other thing you can do is get a bond agent to do it, [01:04:34.000 --> 01:04:37.000] and they're going to charge you 10% of whatever the bond is, [01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:39.000] and you're never getting that back. [01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:44.000] They said that $100 is what I'd have to pay to get a new court date. [01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:49.000] Well, but the thing is, what did they tell you that $100 was for? [01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:50.000] Bond. [01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:52.000] Okay. [01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:57.000] They have to give you something better than that because, like I said, [01:04:57.000 --> 01:05:00.000] the bond is generally twice the amount of the fine. [01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:04.000] What is the actual charge, the seat belt, right? [01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:05.000] Yes. [01:05:05.000 --> 01:05:06.000] Okay. [01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:12.000] So, and the fine for a seat belt is 50 bucks? [01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:14.000] I think it's more than that. [01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:15.000] Okay. [01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:16.000] Then where did the $100 come from? [01:05:16.000 --> 01:05:17.000] You see my point here? [01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:18.000] Yes. [01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:19.000] Okay. [01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:21.000] You need to get details about that. [01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:25.000] Now, you said before we went to break that they had an actual complaint [01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:29.000] for the actual ticket and for the failure to appear. [01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:31.000] When did you see these complaints? [01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:34.000] I went to open records and got them. [01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:35.000] Okay. [01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:40.000] So, it actually says complaint at the top and in and by the authority of the state of Texas? [01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:41.000] Yes. [01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:42.000] Okay. [01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:46.000] But all it says is failure to wear a seat belt, riding in a motor vehicle, [01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:52.000] and then it has an affiant signature at the bottom, Sandra Seacox. [01:05:52.000 --> 01:05:53.000] Is that the officer? [01:05:53.000 --> 01:05:54.000] Signature. [01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:55.000] No. [01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:58.000] No, that's a clerk of the court. [01:05:58.000 --> 01:05:59.000] The affiant? [01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:00.000] Yep. [01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:03.000] Both of those signatures will be from clerks of the court. [01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:07.000] Bet you dollars and doughnuts. [01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:08.000] Okay. [01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:09.000] Yes, I don't know who Sandra Cox is. [01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:10.000] Exactly. [01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:11.000] It will be a clerk of the court. [01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:13.000] You had two clerks sign that. [01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:16.000] This creates a whole new problem for the court. [01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:18.000] The clerks are agents of the judge. [01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:24.000] The judge cannot be both, which makes the judge the accuser on that complaint. [01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:25.000] Okay? [01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:26.000] Yeah. [01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:31.000] Now, your accuser is also the one presiding over your trial. [01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:33.000] How fair is that? [01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:34.000] Not. [01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:35.000] Bingo. [01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:40.000] Move to disqualify the judge as the accuser in the matter, [01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:47.000] thus depriving his court of jurisdiction to preside over the case. [01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:49.000] Do you have a blog on doing that? [01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:52.000] Do I have a blog on doing that? [01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:57.000] I've got a blog, and there's lots of articles on there on how to deal with a judge, [01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:02.000] but you've got to learn to write a motion to disqualify. [01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:03.000] Okay. [01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:04.000] And what about... [01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:08.000] If you have the seminar material, there's lots of example motions in there [01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:11.000] on how to write a motion to disqualify. [01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:13.000] That's one nice thing about the seminar material. [01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:18.000] Almost any document you're going to need is already in there. [01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:22.000] Now, occasionally you've got to man up and learn to put one together yourself [01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:26.000] that is tailored more to what you need than the ones that I wrote, [01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:30.000] but with all the examples from everything I've got in there, [01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:32.000] which is more than 400 different ones, [01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:36.000] it ain't hard to do, or at least it shouldn't be. [01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:38.000] So if you don't have the seminar material for doing these cases, [01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:41.000] I highly recommend you get your hands on it. [01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:46.000] I am currently working diligently on a complete and total rewrite, restructuring, [01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:50.000] and a whole new instruction set for everything in this. [01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:54.000] Every document in it is going to have an instruction document with it [01:07:54.000 --> 01:07:59.000] that hopefully people will learn to read before taking action, but we will see. [01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:04.000] But in any case, the seminar material is a very important tool in this. [01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:08.000] So if you don't have it, I'm going to recommend you get it. [01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:09.000] How do I get it? [01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:16.000] You can go to the logosradionetwork.com website, and you can order it right there. [01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:17.000] All right. [01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:19.000] Okay. [01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:20.000] Sounds good, I appreciate it. [01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:21.000] All right. [01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:23.000] Thanks for calling in, and good luck. [01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:24.000] Bye. [01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:26.000] All right, and just on that note with the seminar material, folks, [01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:29.000] I know all of you out there that purchased this and have used it. [01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:32.000] I know you found the information in a useful and valuable. [01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:35.000] Even if you're not in Texas, you were able to take a lot of it [01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:37.000] and adapt it to where you are. [01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:39.000] If I'm wrong, let me know. [01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:44.000] But I tried to make this where it was useful to everybody in how things should be written [01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:48.000] and how you should find the things you need to know. [01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:55.000] If you're using it successfully to fight your tickets, consider this option. [01:08:55.000 --> 01:09:01.000] Donate at least some percentage of what you would have had to pay [01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:04.000] without that seminar had you lost that case. [01:09:04.000 --> 01:09:10.000] If your ticket was going to be 200 bucks, consider donating 20 when you beat the case. [01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:11.000] Help us out here. [01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:14.000] I know you bought the seminar so that you wouldn't have to pay these tickets, [01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:19.000] but remember where that knowledge and information came from and what it took to make it. [01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:20.000] Help us out. [01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:23.000] We're not asking you to buy the seminar again, [01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:29.000] but at least give us some consideration for the information and knowledge we bestowed upon you [01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:30.000] to help you out. [01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:32.000] That was the whole point of it. [01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:34.000] I mean, it helps us out. [01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:36.000] We can't stay on the air without financing, folks, [01:09:36.000 --> 01:09:41.000] and that requires donations from y'all or advertising or something. [01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:43.000] But without it, we're not here. [01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:46.000] Without it, you're on your own, okay? [01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:49.000] And nowadays, that's not a good place to be. [01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:55.000] I know I busted my butt for 10 years to get the information stuck in my head that I have. [01:09:55.000 --> 01:10:00.000] Believe me, it is not easy to do, but it can be done. [01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:04.000] But it's a whole lot faster and a whole lot simpler if you're following the example [01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:10.000] of someone that's already been there and is attempting to do it the right way, okay? [01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:14.000] So keep that in mind, even if you've already got the seminar material. [01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:20.000] If you don't, consider getting it and then follow suit after that [01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:22.000] if you manage to win your cases with it. [01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:23.000] All right. [01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:26.000] That being said, let's talk to Terrence in Florida. [01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:30.000] Terrence, what can we do for you? [01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:31.000] Hey, Eddie. [01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:34.000] Hope you're doing well. [01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:38.000] Well, as a poor man can be expected these days. [01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:39.000] Yep. [01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:41.000] I'm about just as well. [01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:47.000] I'm looking at a Florida uniform traffic citation that a friend got. [01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:51.000] And just below the name of the city, there's a word, summons in all caps [01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:55.000] in parentheses that says violators copy. [01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:00.000] I'm wondering if that presumes a violator violated a summons, I guess. [01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:02.000] Well, let's see. [01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:07.000] If the citation is creating a presumption that the person [01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:11.000] in receipt of said citation is not innocent rather than guilty, [01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:14.000] which the term violator would appear to indicate, [01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:19.000] can we make an argument that the wording of that particular instrument [01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:25.000] might have an adverse effect on the court's ability to be fair and impartial? [01:11:25.000 --> 01:11:27.000] I mean, let's face facts. [01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:32.000] There have been courts that have been sanctioned because the officer was [01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:38.000] writing handwritten notes to that effect on the copies they were turning in, [01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:43.000] which, of course, the accused never saw or knew anything about. [01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:46.000] Same thing with the prosecutor's records. [01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:51.000] The prosecutor is often writing things into his records that the court sees, [01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:57.000] but the accused does not, and that prejudices the court against the accused. [01:11:57.000 --> 01:11:58.000] Okay? [01:11:58.000 --> 01:12:00.000] Like, for instance, in a traffic ticket I had way back when, [01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:04.000] the only one I ever won full on with a jury, [01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:09.000] with a declaration of not guilty rather than a dismissal, [01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:14.000] I told the judge that the prosecutors never responded to a request to review the record. [01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:17.000] I've never seen what they have in this file. [01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:22.000] So she gave me 10 minutes to go back and review the record. [01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:28.000] Well, in that record, the prosecutor had made a note for the court saying that [01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:31.000] I believed I was a member of the Republic of Texas, [01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:34.000] something I'd never said to anybody at that time, [01:12:34.000 --> 01:12:38.000] didn't even know what the hell he was talking about. [01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:43.000] Yet that was an ex parte communication of information to the court of a [01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:49.000] prejudicial nature that I had not been given any information about. [01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:51.000] Okay? [01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:57.000] Now, you can make the argument that that terminology on there violates the [01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:00.000] presumption of innocence. [01:13:00.000 --> 01:13:01.000] Okay. [01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:02.000] Well, let me go on. [01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:04.000] Okay. [01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:06.000] It says commercial vehicle, box check, no. [01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:08.000] You got choice of yes or no. [01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:09.000] Flat card, no. [01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:10.000] Passengers, no. [01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:12.000] Motorcycle, no. [01:13:12.000 --> 01:13:15.000] Companion citation, no. [01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:17.000] Fatality, no. [01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:18.000] Body injury, no. [01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:20.000] Injury to another, no. [01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:21.000] Property damage, no. [01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:23.000] Crash, no. [01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:25.000] Which is right there. [01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:29.000] What is the actual offense? [01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:33.000] Violation of traffic control device. [01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:36.000] Okay, so this is a light or a sign? [01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:37.000] A sign. [01:13:37.000 --> 01:13:38.000] Okay. [01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:41.000] No, a rolling stop, didn't come to a complete stop. [01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:44.000] Okay. [01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:46.000] All right, so what's your question? [01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:50.000] Well, I'm just saying right there in the face of it is stating there is no [01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:53.000] commercial activity and there is no injury. [01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:55.000] Right. [01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:01.000] So it's just admitting that this officer who issued it stopped you without any [01:14:01.000 --> 01:14:03.000] authority whatsoever. [01:14:03.000 --> 01:14:06.000] Provided you can show that commercial is the only thing the Florida statute [01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:09.000] applies to. [01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:13.000] The presumption exists most certainly, but if you make the assertion, you're [01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:16.000] going to bear the burden of proof of showing that. [01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:18.000] Now, here's the other thing. [01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:26.000] Is this activity in Florida a crime or a civil infraction? [01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:32.000] It says uniform traffic citation to the line don't. [01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:33.000] Right. [01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:39.000] You need to look up the statute on that specific allegation and see what it's [01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:41.000] classified as. [01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:47.000] If it's classified by law as a civil infraction, then the officer, just like I [01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:52.000] told the other caller, the officer seizure of your car and person at that stop [01:14:52.000 --> 01:14:54.000] was illegal. [01:14:54.000 --> 01:14:59.000] There was no crime by which he could establish probable cause. [01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:00.000] Okay. [01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:02.000] Well, let me go from this position. [01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:08.000] Since this citation admits on its face, and let's presume that everything's [01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:09.000] commercial here. [01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:13.000] If you're just traveling, they have no authority. [01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:17.000] On his face, this is admission to a criminal act. [01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:24.000] So shouldn't you, first words to the judge, be what he says to the officer. [01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:26.000] Officer Johnson, read the citation. [01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:29.000] I would say objection. [01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:34.000] I want him, he has rights, and he should be informed of his rights before he [01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:36.000] continues to speak. [01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:37.000] Okay. [01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:39.000] Well, the problem is this. [01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:43.000] They're not presuming that it only applies to commercial. [01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:45.000] They're not making that presumption. [01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:50.000] They're making exactly the opposite presumption, that it applies to everything [01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:52.000] on the road. [01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:55.000] I understand that, but what I'm saying is this officer's... [01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:59.000] I understand what you're saying, but you're not listening to what I'm saying. [01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:02.000] It's not, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:09.000] It's not a criminal act for him to enforce the statute if it properly applies. [01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:14.000] They are operating on the presumption that it properly applies. [01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:21.000] You have to operate on the presumption or the allegation that it does not apply. [01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:27.000] Therefore, you are going to be shouldering the burden of proof to prove that. [01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:33.000] If you can prove that, then and only then can you make the motion you're making [01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:37.000] that this guy is about to incriminate himself because he acted illegally in [01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:39.000] stopping me. [01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:45.000] Otherwise, you're making an argument that you can't prove up, and it's not going [01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:48.000] to help you if you catch my drift. [01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:50.000] You can prove that, though, can't you? [01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:52.000] Well, that depends. [01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:53.000] I haven't read the Florida statute. [01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:54.000] Hang on a second, Terrence. [01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:56.000] Let's do this break, and we'll finish this up. [01:16:56.000 --> 01:16:57.000] We'll be right back, folks. [01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:26.000] Hang in there. [01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:30.000] When ordering your supplies or holiday gifts, the first thing you do is clear [01:17:30.000 --> 01:17:31.000] your cookies. [01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:34.000] Now, go to logosradionetwork.com. [01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:37.000] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:42.000] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and Logos gets a [01:17:42.000 --> 01:17:43.000] few pesos. [01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:44.000] Do I pay extra? [01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:45.000] No. [01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:48.000] No. [01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:49.000] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:50.000] No. [01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:51.000] I mean, yes. [01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:52.000] Wow. [01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:54.000] Giving without doing anything or spending any money. [01:17:54.000 --> 01:17:55.000] This is perfect. [01:17:55.000 --> 01:17:56.000] Thank you so much. [01:17:56.000 --> 01:17:57.000] We are welcome. [01:17:57.000 --> 01:18:00.000] Happy holidays, Logos. [01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the [01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:06.000] area of nutrition. [01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:10.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we [01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:11.000] changed all that. [01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:16.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is [01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:17.000] good nutrition. [01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:21.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and [01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:26.000] mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:30.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most [01:18:30.000 --> 01:18:31.000] of which we reject. [01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:36.000] We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor [01:18:36.000 --> 01:18:40.000] along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:45.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you [01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:47.000] help support quality radio. [01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:52.000] As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:56.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and [01:18:56.000 --> 01:18:59.000] family, and increase your income. [01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:00.000] Order now. [01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:28.000] This is the Logos Radio Network. [01:19:28.000 --> 01:19:30.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:36.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984. [01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:38.000] Real quick before I get back to Terrence here. [01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:43.000] Folks, I get callers in from all over the country, sometimes outside the [01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:49.000] country, that are looking for people to share the ability to study their [01:19:49.000 --> 01:19:55.000] particular state or country's laws and learn how this stuff works, really is [01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:57.000] supposed to work. [01:19:57.000 --> 01:20:00.000] So let me put this out there for everyone. [01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:04.000] Had the website gotten up and running when it was supposed to, we were going [01:20:04.000 --> 01:20:10.000] to have a way for everyone to join up and link together and form these [01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:11.000] groups. [01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:14.000] It made it very easy for everyone to locate each other as far as people that [01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:17.000] want to cooperatively study within a state. [01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:21.000] It would have had all kinds of ways for you all to link up and start your [01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:23.000] groups and manage those groups and so on and so forth. [01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:25.000] We haven't got there yet. [01:20:25.000 --> 01:20:29.000] I'm still working on the funding and the backing to get that done. [01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:33.000] But fortunately, I'm now in contact with people that may actually allow that [01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:36.000] to become a reality, though I don't know how soon. [01:20:36.000 --> 01:20:40.000] That being said, that system is not yet in place. [01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:44.000] And even though it is going to create an enormous amount of extra work for [01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:49.000] me, let's try this in the meantime. [01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:55.000] If you have a desire to hook up with people where you live or in your state, [01:20:55.000 --> 01:21:01.000] whatever that may be, send me an email with your contact information, the [01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:07.000] state you're from, the city you're from, and how to get in touch with you, [01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:09.000] whether it be email, telephone, whatever. [01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:12.000] Now, be aware of what I'm going to do with that information. [01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:20.000] I am going to compile a separate document for each state or country. [01:21:20.000 --> 01:21:26.000] And I'm going to put the information from that email in that document. [01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:32.000] If you want that document for that state or country, then you need to give me [01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:36.000] your information to add to it and send an email requesting it for wherever you [01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:39.000] are, and I will send that information out. [01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:43.000] So you will now have the complete list of everyone, and the next time I send [01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:47.000] it out, you will be on the list that everyone else gets. [01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:51.000] So that will mean that these lists will be ongoing and updated over time. [01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:56.000] So I'm going to need to put them online somewhere where y'all can download an [01:21:56.000 --> 01:21:59.000] updated version as they get updated. [01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:05.000] Again, going to create a lot of extra work for me to do, but it will hopefully [01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:10.000] provide us with a way of getting you people in the same state and same cities [01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:15.000] and so on and so forth hooked up together to make your study groups. [01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:16.000] Okay? [01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:21.000] So that being said, if you want to do that and participate in that, then send [01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:27.000] me an email to eddi at ruleoflawradio.com. [01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:31.000] That's E-D-D-I-E, not E-D-D-Y, okay? [01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:35.000] Eddi at ruleoflawradio.com. [01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:42.000] In the subject, put study partners wanted, okay? [01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:46.000] I will set up my email filters to take care of that and at least get them all in [01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:52.000] one place for me to review, but you need to put that in the subject line, [01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:56.000] study partners wanted. [01:22:56.000 --> 01:22:57.000] I see that. [01:22:57.000 --> 01:23:00.000] I will know I can take that information from that email, put it in the proper [01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:04.000] document, and make it available for folks that want to do it. [01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:09.000] So if you do not want to participate in that, don't request the document. [01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:11.000] It's that simple. [01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:14.000] Because it's only fair that if you're going to get everybody else's information, [01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:18.000] you better be willing to give out your own to participate, right? [01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:23.000] So if you want it, once this document starts getting made, let me know, but be [01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:26.000] sure that you provide your information to go into it. [01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:29.000] Because if you're going to study, everybody needs to be able to get in touch [01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:32.000] with each other until we have a system in place that will allow you all to do [01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:34.000] it without me being the middleman. [01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:35.000] I will do the best I can. [01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:39.000] I cannot promise the timeframe in which I will get it done, but I will do my [01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:44.000] best to get them updated as fast as I can as I am able, okay? [01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:47.000] That being said, let's get back to Terrence. [01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:50.000] All right, Terrence, the last word you were saying was, but you can prove [01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:51.000] that, okay? [01:23:51.000 --> 01:23:52.000] Can you? [01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:54.000] You. [01:23:54.000 --> 01:23:58.000] I don't know if I could, but I'm quite sure I probably could. [01:23:58.000 --> 01:23:59.000] Okay, yeah, that's my question. [01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:01.000] If this was a Texas citation. [01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:04.000] Oh, in Texas, I could absolutely do it. [01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:10.000] In Texas, you could actually get that officer charged with a criminal act. [01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:13.000] No, that's two different actions there. [01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:16.000] Proving the ticket is false is one thing. [01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:20.000] Getting the officer charged is not within your power. [01:24:20.000 --> 01:24:23.000] You can make a complaint, but you can't actually charge him. [01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:29.000] That's a prosecutor's job, and that almost will never happen. [01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:34.000] You can take it to a grand jury, and it will still almost never happen. [01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:42.000] But what it would do is give you the ability to sue. [01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:49.000] So back to my first thought is when the officer starts reading the citation, [01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:55.000] you object, and you say, Judge, I believe this man's going to witness against [01:24:55.000 --> 01:25:02.000] himself the criminal act, and he should be informed of his rights to remain silent. [01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:04.000] Well, you can make that motion. [01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:09.000] I don't expect the court to agree with you or to follow through on it. [01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:10.000] Okay? [01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:11.000] You think they would. [01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:16.000] Well, you would think they would think, but they don't do that either. [01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:17.000] Right. [01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:20.000] But it should be that easy, Judge. [01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:23.000] This guy's about ready to admit the criminal act. [01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:29.000] Well, while I agree it should be that easy, it's not going to be that easy. [01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:36.000] Because like I said, even if you make that assertion, even if they give you the [01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:42.000] opportunity to prove your point, exactly how are you going to go about proving your point? [01:25:42.000 --> 01:25:45.000] Well, like I said, you could in Texas. [01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:46.000] You could do that. [01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:47.000] Yeah. [01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:48.000] I could do it here. [01:25:48.000 --> 01:25:49.000] Okay. [01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:51.000] So we should be able to do it everywhere. [01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:57.000] If you can get your due diligence research done, absolutely. [01:25:57.000 --> 01:25:58.000] Okay. [01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:02.000] But I don't think you're going to have time to do that before you need to respond to that citation. [01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:03.000] Well, no. [01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:08.000] This one here, he's going to pay it because, oh, and by the way, as far as bill of [01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:19.000] utility, it does have a price of $163. [01:26:19.000 --> 01:26:20.000] I don't know. [01:26:20.000 --> 01:26:24.000] I don't know how the laws in Florida allow them to assess the fines. [01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:31.000] If he's got a preprinted list of approved amounts plus court costs or what, I don't know how that works. [01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:36.000] But what you can show is if he's put a citation together with a money amount on it, [01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:40.000] the presumption must be that that money amount also includes fees from the court, [01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:46.000] which means that witness is acting on behalf of that court for the collection of their money, [01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:52.000] as well as that for the municipality or state or county entity that wrote the ticket, [01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:56.000] which now shows you do not have a fair and impartial witness against you. [01:26:56.000 --> 01:27:02.000] You've got a bought and paid for witness against you because he's acting on the behalf of the same entity, [01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:11.000] the court, in the court fees collection that's going to take part of that money from that citation. [01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:16.000] You see how this system is set up to deny due process in every possible way you can imagine? [01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:19.000] Everybody's finger is in this pie financially. [01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:22.000] Whether they want you to understand that or not, it is. [01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:28.000] How do you get a fair and impartial proceeding when the very entities involved have a vested financial [01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:31.000] interest in the outcome of the case? [01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:37.000] On the back of the instructions, it says important instructions regarding a non-criminal traffic infraction [01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:40.000] not requiring a court appearance. [01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:43.000] And basically it's pay us. [01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:50.000] Yeah, but is there information on that citation that says that's what you're being charged with? [01:27:50.000 --> 01:27:52.000] That's what you need to find out. [01:27:52.000 --> 01:28:00.000] Is the particular allegation on that citation criminal or a civil infraction? [01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:02.000] Well, it says non-criminal. [01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:03.000] No, no, no, no, no. [01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:08.000] You have information on the citation that says, that talks about non-criminal. [01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:18.000] Does it specifically say the offense with which you are being ticketed is a civil infraction, non-criminal? [01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:24.000] Because if it's a uniform citation, it's the same citation they issue for all of them, right? [01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:27.000] It says infraction with does not require a person, of course. [01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:30.000] Wait a minute, you're not answering my question. [01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:34.000] This is a uniform citation for the state of Florida, right? [01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:35.000] Correct. [01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:36.000] Okay. [01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:43.000] It's the same citation they issue for civil infractions as for criminal offenses, isn't it? [01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:45.000] I do not know that. [01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:49.000] Uniform citation. [01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:52.000] Does that include criminal and civil? [01:28:52.000 --> 01:28:57.000] Well, if it's the uniform citation, I'm pretty sure it would. [01:28:57.000 --> 01:28:58.000] That's what I'm saying. [01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:07.000] So you cannot presume that the information on the back relating to civil infractions is directly related to what you've been allegedly charged with. [01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:15.000] You need to find out for sure whether or not it is an offense or it's a civil infraction. [01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:17.000] I didn't say it. [01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:18.000] Right. [01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:20.000] That's why you need to go look. [01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:22.000] It says a civil penalty. [01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:23.000] Okay. [01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:31.000] Again, you don't know that that's what that money amount on the front is being charged as, a civil penalty or a criminal penalty. [01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:33.000] Well, it says civil penalty. [01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:34.000] It doesn't say civil or criminal. [01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:36.000] It doesn't say slash or anything like that. [01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:37.000] Okay. [01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:43.000] Go read the statute and see what it's classified as. [01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:44.000] Okay. [01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:48.000] Then you'll know. [01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:49.000] All right. [01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:52.000] Well, what I do know is you can convict them. [01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:53.000] Well, hang on just a minute, Terrence. [01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:54.000] I'll wrap this up when we get back. [01:29:54.000 --> 01:29:55.000] All right, folks. [01:29:55.000 --> 01:29:56.000] Hang in there. [01:29:56.000 --> 01:30:02.000] We'll be right back. [01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:03.000] Is this your mommy? [01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:09.000] Getting kids paired up with parents after school is a critical responsibility of teachers and school administrators. [01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:13.000] But is technology a good substitute for common sense? [01:30:13.000 --> 01:30:16.000] I've got your Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you more in just a moment. [01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:21.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:34.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:41.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:50.000] A product called KidGopher promises to match kids with parents waiting to pick them up. [01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:57.000] It assigns parents RFID radio frequency microchipped ID cards that can be read by a computer system several feet away. [01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:02.000] The unique number on each card triggers a screen display of guardian names and pictures. [01:31:02.000 --> 01:31:05.000] But radio signals can be cloned, and databases can be altered. [01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:09.000] And supposedly secure technology tends to make humans lazy. [01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:13.000] Nothing can replace the security of staff simply knowing the students and their parents. [01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:18.000] KidGopher would not only put kids at risk, it would condition them to accept RFID and tracking. [01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:21.000] And that's not good for our future. [01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:36.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:42.000] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:42.000 --> 01:31:45.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:48.000] Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:50.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:57.000] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:00.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:03.000] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. [01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:10.000] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it. [01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:14.000] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:20.000] That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:26.000] And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. [01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:31.000] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:38.000] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:45.000] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:01.000] I may not actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:11.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradio.com. [01:33:31.000 --> 01:34:00.000] All right, folks, we are back, and we're going to wrap this up with Terrence. [01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:17.000] All right, Terrence, you need to go read the actual statute relating to the offense on the citation and see how the legislature classified that allegation, okay, specifically. [01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:19.000] So go find that. [01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:26.000] Look it up, because that's the only way you're going to know for sure. [01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:29.000] You cannot trust that someone's going to tell you correctly what it is. [01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:37.000] You need to verify it for yourself. [01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:38.000] Good enough. [01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:39.000] Okay. [01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:40.000] Got it. [01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:41.000] All right, man. [01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:42.000] Take care and good luck. [01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:43.000] Enjoy. [01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:44.000] You, too. [01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:45.000] How about it? [01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:47.000] All right, now we have John in Texas. [01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:51.000] John, what can we do for you? [01:34:51.000 --> 01:34:52.000] I was just wondering. [01:34:52.000 --> 01:34:56.000] I drive a truck for a living. [01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:06.000] And I'm tired of all these cops pulling me over from the side of the road, wanting to do random DOT checks on my truck. [01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:13.000] They pulled over north on 45 at a waste station there, and I told them I wasn't going to participate in it. [01:35:13.000 --> 01:35:23.000] Next thing I know, the trooper got all pissed off and called my company threatening to get me fired. [01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:26.000] Is there anything I can do? [01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:30.000] I mean, do I have to reduce my ID or my license when I'm driving a truck? [01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:32.000] Well, here's the thing. [01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:35.000] First thing is you're in a regulated activity. [01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:42.000] So whatever you agreed to in order to participate in that occupational activity as a privilege, you're subject to. [01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:48.000] However, the issue you're facing has certain caveats to it. [01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:57.000] And that is whether or not the individuals that are pulling these stops on you actually have the legal authority to do it. [01:35:57.000 --> 01:36:06.000] For instance, here in Texas, the local cops, meaning the county officers, sheriff's department, and so on, [01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:19.000] the county constables, and the municipalities do not have the authority to enforce the transportation code unless they have been specifically certified [01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:25.000] and trained to do so by the Department of Public Safety under the Texas Administrative Code. [01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:27.000] Okay? [01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:34.000] That means the municipalities and the county sheriffs and stuff, they can't just pull you over for the heck of it and inspect you. [01:36:34.000 --> 01:36:37.000] They have no authority to enforce that code. [01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:40.000] Only the Department of Public Safety has that authority. [01:36:40.000 --> 01:36:48.000] In fact, in the code, constables are only authorized to perform one function in relation to transportation, [01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:53.000] and that is participate as security at way stations. [01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:55.000] That's it. [01:36:55.000 --> 01:37:05.000] But unless they are specifically authorized under Rule 4.13C of the Texas Administrative Code under Title 37 for the Department of Public Safety [01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:13.000] to enforce the transportation code under Chapter 644, which is commercial motor vehicles, which is what you're in, [01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:19.000] they have no authority to facilitate a traffic stop, period. [01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:20.000] They have none. [01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:21.000] Okay. [01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:27.000] Now, if you're going into some other state, if you're going into some other state, [01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:35.000] then you need to find out what the officers of that particular state are authorized to do in relation to commercial activity. [01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:37.000] Okay. [01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:39.000] That could vary from each state to state. [01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:41.000] It very well could vary. [01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:44.000] In some states, they may authorize meter maids to do it. [01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:46.000] Who knows? [01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:52.000] But here in Texas, the statutes are very specific as to who is given the authority to enforce. [01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:58.000] Every single place in the transportation code that deals with enforcement, [01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:03.000] the only entity named as having that authority is the Department of Public Safety. [01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:16.000] The only entity and under Rule 4.13C of the Texas Administrative Code under Title 37 is the only place where you can find the ability [01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:22.000] to authorize non-DPS personnel to enforce the transportation code. [01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:31.000] And as of right now, if you send a public information request to the Department of Public Safety as to who is certified under that rule, [01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:36.000] you'll get back a list of approximately 60-some-odd names in the entire state, [01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:43.000] 60-some-odd names of local officials that are actually authorized to enforce the code. [01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:47.000] Everybody else is doing it illegally. [01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:48.000] Really? [01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:50.000] Yep. [01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:51.000] So, all right. [01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:53.000] So I'll have to look into that one. [01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:54.000] I appreciate the time. [01:38:54.000 --> 01:38:55.000] Yes, sir. [01:38:55.000 --> 01:38:56.000] Thanks for calling in. [01:38:56.000 --> 01:38:57.000] Happy Thanksgiving. [01:38:57.000 --> 01:38:58.000] You, too. [01:38:58.000 --> 01:38:59.000] Hope you're home to see it. [01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:00.000] Bye-bye. [01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:01.000] All right. [01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:02.000] Bye-bye. [01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:03.000] I will. [01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:04.000] Thanks. [01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:05.000] Bye-bye. [01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:06.000] All right. [01:39:06.000 --> 01:39:07.000] Now we have Olivier in Tennessee. [01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:12.000] Now, folks, he's my last caller on the board at the moment, and I've got, oh, coming up on my last segment. [01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:15.000] I don't know if we'll have the whole time, but Olivier, what do you got? [01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:18.000] And let's see how long it's going to take us. [01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:19.000] How are you doing, Eddie? [01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:20.000] I'm doing all right. [01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:21.000] How about you? [01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:22.000] Yeah. [01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:23.000] I'm good. [01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:25.000] I'm figuring everything out. [01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:31.000] I would like to make a comment about you talking about the fundraising, and I bought the seminar, [01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:37.000] and I really haven't looked into it because the information that you've been giving over [01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:44.000] the phone is pretty well relevant and conclusive to where I was able to get things accomplished [01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:45.000] from there. [01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:50.000] But I'm still going to go over the seminar when I get a chance, but I've gotten things [01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:52.000] started so far without it. [01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:58.000] And anyone who can, I think, should support your radio station. [01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:01.000] When I get the ability to, I will support you some more. [01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:05.000] So I really got to commend, and thank you for that. [01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:12.000] But I got a question about, I got a lawsuit with the cards, right? [01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:16.000] They dismissed, he dismissed my case, but I'm going to appeal it. [01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:23.000] But the company is using one of my, we've passed by, we deliver paperwork, and we've [01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:27.000] figured out that they've been using our trailers. [01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:30.000] What do you mean using your trailers? [01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:36.000] They're using them to carry in all equipment. [01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:42.000] The cars, they towed 10 of my cars and two of my trailers. [01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:45.000] Okay. [01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:48.000] And they've been using two of my trailers. [01:40:48.000 --> 01:40:53.000] Oh, so they've actually taken your private property and they're using it themselves? [01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:54.000] Yes. [01:40:54.000 --> 01:40:57.000] Have you managed to get evidence that they're doing that? [01:40:57.000 --> 01:41:01.000] Have you photographed them using it, videotaped them using it, got a written admission that [01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:03.000] they're using it? [01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:08.000] I got pictures of it with equipment on it, like a car. [01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:12.000] Yeah, equipment on it, but attached to what? [01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:13.000] To their truck. [01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:16.000] And you got pictures of their truck? [01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:17.000] Yes. [01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:22.000] And you took photographs of the license plate on the trailer to prove it's your trailer? [01:41:22.000 --> 01:41:24.000] Well, I took pictures of the trailer. [01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:27.000] It doesn't have a, my trailer doesn't have a license plate on it. [01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:30.000] Okay, it doesn't. [01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:31.000] All right. [01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:37.000] So how are you going to wind up proving, even with the photograph, that that's your trailer? [01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:43.000] Because there's the same trailer that they removed from my house. [01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:45.000] They have on record that that's the trailer. [01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:46.000] Well, but that's my point. [01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:51.000] Even if it is the same trailer, which I'm not doubting that it is, is there some paperwork [01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:56.000] that you have that would identify that trailer by serial number or some manner that they [01:41:56.000 --> 01:42:01.000] cannot alter as being the one that you own? [01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:03.000] I got videos of the trailer. [01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:08.000] Well, again, how many trailers that look like yours are in existence? [01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:10.000] Not many. [01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:11.000] Okay. [01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:17.000] So even if there's none, how do you prove that that is the trailer that was yours? [01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:20.000] Unless you've got some sort of paperwork. [01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:22.000] I'm not saying their paperwork. [01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:24.000] I'm saying from where you bought it, for instance. [01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:28.000] Bills of sale, something that matches up the serial numbers, if it's got serial numbers, [01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:30.000] or whatever. [01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:32.000] Yeah, it doesn't have those things. [01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:33.000] Okay. [01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:34.000] Then that's the problem. [01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:39.000] They're using your property, but now you're going to face the hurdle of proving that that's [01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:41.000] your property. [01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:42.000] Okay. [01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:46.000] So what you're going to need to do is get them, did they give you a receipt for the [01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:47.000] property when they took it? [01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:48.000] No, they didn't. [01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:50.000] They took it without your consent, didn't they? [01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:51.000] Right. [01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:52.000] So they gave you nothing. [01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:55.000] Did they give you an inventory sheet? [01:42:55.000 --> 01:42:56.000] No. [01:42:56.000 --> 01:42:59.000] Right, which they're supposed to do. [01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:04.000] They took the property, they did not inventory it, they did not photograph it for identification [01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:07.000] purposes to match up to that inventory. [01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:12.000] These are all things that these entities under most statutes in most municipalities and counties [01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:17.000] and states are required to do when they take private property. [01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:19.000] They're required to put it on an inventory sheet. [01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:25.000] They're required to put down identifying information and photograph it if there is no other form [01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:29.000] of identifying information and put that with the inventory sheet. [01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:31.000] And none of them do it. [01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:34.000] They just steal the property. [01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:40.000] Thus, you have no way to go and say that is actually mine. [01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:43.000] You understand why I'm saying that? [01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:44.000] Okay. [01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:45.000] All right. [01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:47.000] That's the problem you're going to run into, I guarantee you. [01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:48.000] Hang on just a second. [01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:50.000] We'll be right back on the other side of this. [01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:51.000] We've got a break here. [01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:52.000] All right, folks. [01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:56.000] Call and number in this last segment, 512-646-1984. [01:43:56.000 --> 01:44:00.000] We will be right back. [01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:14.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. [01:44:14.000 --> 01:44:20.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. [01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:24.000] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. [01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:26.000] How to answer letters and phone calls. [01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:29.000] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:33.000] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:38.000] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:44:38.000 --> 01:44:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:44:41.000 --> 01:44:49.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [01:44:49.000 --> 01:45:00.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:15.000] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:21.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:22.000 --> 01:46:24.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:46:24.000 --> 01:46:26.000] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:31.000] We are now in the last segment of the show for this Monday night, and we are talking with Olivier in Tennessee. [01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:36.000] All right, Olivier, now, as you can see, that's going to present a problem, [01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:46.000] because without some way of proving that the piece of property they have in their possession is actually rightfully your property, it's your word against theirs as to where it came from. [01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:47.000] All right. [01:46:47.000 --> 01:46:52.000] The only way you could do that is to prove that there is no other trailer that looks like yours [01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:58.000] and then have pictures of you in possession of that trailer on dates prior to them being in possession of it. [01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:03.000] You kind of see how complicated that's going to get real fast? [01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:08.000] Well, they have pictures of it on record when they took my BMW. [01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:12.000] That's the same trailer that my BMW was sitting on. [01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:17.000] So they got pictures of it. It's documented in public. [01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:20.000] Do you have those pictures? [01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:22.000] Yeah, I got a few. [01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:23.000] Okay. [01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:27.000] Let me give you another suggestion for things like trailers especially, [01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:30.000] especially if you're not going to register them and put plates on them for that number, [01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:33.000] not that that would help because they could always change the plates. [01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:39.000] Find some place that is not readily visible and put a number on that. [01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:43.000] Put an identifying mark that you can photograph but they will never see, [01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:47.000] like under the front of the tongue, for instance, on the I-beam under the tongue [01:47:47.000 --> 01:47:49.000] or on the bottom of the tongue at the front. [01:47:49.000 --> 01:47:53.000] Just lay down under it and inscribe a serial number or your name or something on it. [01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:55.000] Photograph it. Show that it's there. [01:47:55.000 --> 01:48:00.000] And then you can prove later on that, hey, that's mine, just an FYI. [01:48:00.000 --> 01:48:01.000] Okay. [01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:02.000] All right. [01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:06.000] Do something to make that property unique and identifiable no matter what else they may do [01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:11.000] because odds are they will never find that marking underneath the frame of a trailer. [01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:16.000] They'll never look for it for one thing. [01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:22.000] But in the meantime, if you've got photographs of it on your property with your car prior to them getting it, [01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:27.000] then there's a possibility you could make the argument that that is yours. [01:48:27.000 --> 01:48:30.000] I still see them putting up a fight about it though. [01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:35.000] We have them on video when they was taking it away from our property. [01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:36.000] Well, that's good too. [01:48:36.000 --> 01:48:42.000] But you still have to prove the one that you're claiming they're using is the same one. [01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:44.000] You understand that problem, right? [01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:45.000] Right. [01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:46.000] Okay. [01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:52.000] So the next thing I would try to do is I would go talk to whatever entity you know is in possession of this trailer [01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:59.000] and say, okay, can I ask why you people are using my private property for your corporate business? [01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:03.000] You stole that from my property and now you're using it. [01:49:03.000 --> 01:49:09.000] Can you tell me why that is and make sure you're recording this conversation for the love of people, okay? [01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:10.000] All right. [01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:15.000] And get someone admitting that they know full well it's yours or that it is yours, [01:49:15.000 --> 01:49:18.000] but they took it and now it's theirs and blah, blah, blah. [01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:26.000] Get them on record confessing to criminal activity. [01:49:26.000 --> 01:49:36.000] Now the other thing is once they took it, how long did they give you to do something to get it back and did you do it? [01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:38.000] Or at least try to do it? [01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:40.000] How long? [01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:46.000] They wanted me to pay for it, storage fees and which I couldn't afford. [01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:47.000] Right. [01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:50.000] But they took it illegally to begin with. [01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:52.000] Which you're suing them over, right? [01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:53.000] Yes. [01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:58.000] Then what you need to do is sue them for the use of that property as well, [01:49:58.000 --> 01:50:05.000] as well as the deprivation of your use of that property as a damage. [01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:07.000] So do I include it in there or? [01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:09.000] You need to make that a part of your suit. [01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:15.000] You need to make part of the reason you're asking for X dollars is because they have used your private property [01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:25.000] for public use without your consent illegally and thus you're going to charge them rental fees. [01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:36.000] Find out what the average mean rental fee is for a trader on a daily basis or over a period of time and add that to your damages. [01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:38.000] Sue for that use. [01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:46.000] I got them for $750,000 because of what the judge put down there worse than the triple law that we have. [01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:47.000] Right. [01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:50.000] Let me try to get you this information out right quick. [01:50:50.000 --> 01:50:53.000] He dismissed two of the suits that I had. [01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:55.000] I have three going in right now. [01:50:55.000 --> 01:50:59.000] One for the BMW, which is separate incidents. [01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:02.000] Then I have the one with the 12 car incidents. [01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:05.000] Then another one with the false imprisonment. [01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:16.000] So I had brought the auto transport to court asking for default judgment because they didn't answer the complaint. [01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:23.000] And I brought the city to court to amend one of the other cases, my BMW case. [01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:28.000] The judge denied my amendment to my BMW case. [01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:41.000] And then he denied my, he said that he was not going to hear my motion against auto transport because the city had a court date on the 15th, [01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:47.000] which it was the 14th, and I'm not supposed to put opposing dates on the calendar. [01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:51.000] I should have put my hearing for the 15th. [01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:57.000] So he's not going to hear the motion against auto transport until tomorrow. [01:51:57.000 --> 01:52:05.000] So now on the 15th came, now we're hearing the city has a motion for default judgment against me, [01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:09.000] which is an involuntary dismissal, which is prohibited. [01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:15.000] And for, say, it's a state of claim, which can be claimed, and immunity. [01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:17.000] The city has immunity. [01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:20.000] And anything else? [01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:22.000] I think, again, for those two. [01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:32.000] Then we argue those out, then the court, the judge awarded, said that, well, the city has immunity, and I failed to state a claim. [01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:35.000] And I failed to state a claim. [01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:40.000] Did you file for a findings of facts and conclusions of law after that? [01:52:40.000 --> 01:52:44.000] I'm going to file that tomorrow because this happened last week. [01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:45.000] Okay. [01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:49.000] Well, you may only have a certain number of days, so don't delay on that. [01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:50.000] Yeah, I'm doing that. [01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:52.000] I'll file that tomorrow morning. [01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:53.000] Okay. [01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:55.000] A motion for finding the facts on each case, right? [01:52:55.000 --> 01:52:57.000] Right. [01:52:57.000 --> 01:52:59.000] Okay. [01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:01.000] So now he dismissed the case. [01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:03.000] I mean, he dismissed it. [01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:04.000] I said, okay. [01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:07.000] And he's trying to get ready to go. [01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:09.000] I said, hold on, Your Honor. [01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:13.000] What happened with the motion on auto transport? [01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:27.000] He said, oh, and during the debate, during the argument, I accused the attorney of trying to represent all the defendants on the cases, and he doesn't have the authority. [01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:31.000] So the defendant ran, I mean, the attorney ran back up. [01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:37.000] He said, Your Honor, I just stated those things just because there were facts. [01:53:37.000 --> 01:53:39.000] I'm not trying to defend anyone. [01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:46.000] The only, I don't represent the rest of the defendants, the only person I represent is the city of Clarksville. [01:53:46.000 --> 01:53:47.000] Okay. [01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:48.000] Now, wait a minute. [01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:53.000] The attorney actually said that he made a statement of facts. [01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:58.000] No, the attorney said that he did not represent anyone else. [01:53:58.000 --> 01:54:06.000] No, you said prior to that, though, that I only said those things because they're facts. [01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:07.000] Yes. [01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:10.000] So he made a statement of facts. [01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:14.000] Yes, he made a statement of facts in the defense. [01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:17.000] This is the attorney in defending who? [01:54:17.000 --> 01:54:21.000] Against the defense of the other defendants on the case. [01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:22.000] Okay. [01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:23.000] I accused him of that on the record. [01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:25.000] But here's the problem. [01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:28.000] The attorney can't make statements of fact. [01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:32.000] That's testifying. [01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:46.000] No, like in his answer, like in his motion to dismiss, he made comments about me not serving the other defendants and stuff and things like that, which I still had time to serve in the summons. [01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:52.000] So I made an argument that he's trying to defend the other defendants. [01:54:52.000 --> 01:54:57.000] He ran back up and said, Your Honor, I'm not trying to defend the other defendants. [01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:04.000] I was just concluding, I was just putting facts about the case. [01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:06.000] I'm not trying to defend them. [01:55:06.000 --> 01:55:10.000] Those are just relevant facts, and they should be dismissed. [01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:13.000] But I do not represent those defendants. [01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:16.000] He said that clearly on record. [01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:17.000] Okay. [01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:23.000] But now when I asked the judge, wait a minute, how about the motion against auto transport? [01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:30.000] He said, well, auto transport was acting in the authority of the city. [01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:37.000] So the city represents, the city, the attorney for the city represents auto transport. [01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:39.000] Whoa, objection, Judge. [01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:46.000] The city attorney cannot represent a private entity. [01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:55.000] I'm looking at him like, did he say yes, I'm dismissing the motion against him. [01:55:55.000 --> 01:56:02.000] So I'm sitting here like, you just, wow, you just gave me the strength to win. [01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:03.000] Pretty much. [01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:10.000] The city attorney has no authority to represent a private entity as the city attorney, [01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:18.000] even if they're acting under the direction of the city. [01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:19.000] He even ran up there. [01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:21.000] He said, he was listening to me. [01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:23.000] He was real afraid too. [01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:26.000] I had something up my sleeve. [01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:30.000] He looked in the back and he was like, Your Honor, I am not representing anyone. [01:56:30.000 --> 01:56:32.000] That is not what I was trying to do. [01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:33.000] Right. [01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:36.000] Now see, here's the problem from what that judge just said. [01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:40.000] The city attorney is who said, made this motion, right? [01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:41.000] Yes. [01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:42.000] Okay. [01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:47.000] The city attorney just said in open court, I am not representing that entity. [01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:50.000] And then the judge gets up there and says he's dismissing your motion [01:56:50.000 --> 01:56:53.000] because he is representing that entity. [01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:54.000] Yes. [01:56:54.000 --> 01:56:55.000] Yeah. [01:56:55.000 --> 01:56:59.000] See, that right there is gross stupidity in action. [01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:07.000] The judge just ruled that the attorney is now obligated to represent the private entity, [01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:10.000] which he cannot legally do. [01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:15.000] And he did it under the false pretenses of dismissing your motion illegally. [01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:16.000] Right. [01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:19.000] You need to move for this judge's removal from the bench. [01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:24.000] This is judicial incompetence at its best. [01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:25.000] Okay. [01:57:25.000 --> 01:57:29.000] Because he's setting me up for wins, I understand that concept. [01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:31.000] Should I wait until I... [01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:32.000] Uh-uh. [01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:33.000] Wait, wait, wait. [01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:34.000] Here's the problem. [01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:40.000] There is tons of case law on the invitation of error to seek a benefit for oneself in these cases. [01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:46.000] You cannot invite error and then seek to benefit from that error. [01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:53.000] If you saw them do something wrong, you are obligated to object to it and to argue against it. [01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:58.000] Failure to do so will prevent you from going after them for it. [01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:02.000] Don't fail to do that. [01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:04.000] So I need to argue that in my appeal? [01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:06.000] Absolutely. [01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:07.000] Okay. [01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:10.000] No, I was talking about going after criminal charges. [01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:16.000] You can do it as both, but don't forget to object and argue that the judge had no authority [01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:20.000] to declare the city attorney counsel for the private entity. [01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:21.000] I got you, boss. [01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:22.000] Okay. [01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:23.000] Uh-huh. [01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:24.000] All right, man. [01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:25.000] I'm out of time. [01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:26.000] Thanks for calling in. [01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:27.000] All right, folks. [01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:30.000] This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig. [01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:31.000] Thank you all for listening. [01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:36.000] Please keep us in your financial prayers to the best of your abilities every time you can. [01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:38.000] We can't be here without you. [01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:39.000] Y'all have a great week. [01:58:39.000 --> 01:58:50.000] Good night and God bless. [01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:57.000] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:57.000 --> 01:59:04.000] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, [01:59:04.000 --> 01:59:08.000] helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:25.000] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:25.000 --> 01:59:30.000] plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:35.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, [01:59:35.000 --> 01:59:41.000] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:06.000] Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.