[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your deli bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:16.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:20.000 --> 00:29.000]  Markets for Friday, the 4th of November, 2016, are currently trading with gold at $1,304.10 an ounce, silver $18.41 an ounce,
[00:29.000 --> 00:37.000]  Texas crude, $44.66 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $697 U.S. currency.
[00:41.000 --> 00:48.000]  Today in history, the year 1952, the United States government establishes the National Security Agency, or NSA,
[00:48.000 --> 00:52.000]  an intelligence organization of the United States government responsible for global monitoring,
[00:52.000 --> 00:57.000]  collection, and processing of information and data for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes.
[00:57.000 --> 01:00.000]  The NSA was established today in history.
[01:03.000 --> 01:10.000]  In recent news, WikiLeaks just dumped part 30 of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta's hacked emails,
[01:10.000 --> 01:13.000]  bringing the total thus far to over $47,000.
[01:13.000 --> 01:19.000]  Julian Assange, who still is essentially on house arrest at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, gave an interview with Russia Today
[01:19.000 --> 01:25.000]  where he claims that the outcome of next Tuesday's presidential election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton has already been decided,
[01:25.000 --> 01:31.000]  saying, quote, because he has had every establishment off his side, Trump does not have one establishment,
[01:31.000 --> 01:35.000]  maybe with the exception of the evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment.
[01:35.000 --> 01:42.000]  Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, et cetera, are all united behind Hillary Clinton and the media as well,
[01:42.000 --> 01:44.000]  media owners and the journalists themselves.
[01:44.000 --> 01:51.000]  This is days after political activists discovered a hidden website for WRCB, an NBC affiliate out of Chattanooga, Tennessee,
[01:51.000 --> 01:58.000]  showing election results with Hillary Clinton securing 343 electoral votes and 42 percent of the popular vote.
[01:58.000 --> 02:04.000]  Hillary, her campaign and the media are accusing Russia for the hacking of tens of thousands of emails that WikiLeaks has dumped out in the past weeks.
[02:04.000 --> 02:08.000]  However, Julian Assange has vehemently denied any involvement from the Kremlin.
[02:08.000 --> 02:22.000]  A majority of Hillary's hacked emails that have been released via WikiLeaks since March of 2016 can be searched through at WikiLeaks.org forward slash Clinton dash emails.
[02:22.000 --> 02:30.000]  CBS News reported earlier today that U.S. intelligence agencies have alerted joint terrorism task forces that al Qaeda could potentially be planning terrorist attacks in New York,
[02:30.000 --> 02:35.000]  Texas and Virginia for Monday, the day before the election, though no specific cities and landmarks are mentioned.
[02:35.000 --> 02:42.000]  Counterterrorism spokespersons have stated that as the election day nears, federal law enforcement is planning for several worst case scenarios.
[02:42.000 --> 02:54.000]  While earlier this week, an alert warned local police of polling places being seen as attractive targets for lone wolf type of attacks by individuals motivated by violent extremist ideologies such as sovereign citizens.
[02:54.000 --> 03:08.000]  This is Ruth Rode with your lowdown for November 4th, 2016.
[03:24.000 --> 03:32.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:32.000 --> 03:38.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:38.000 --> 03:43.000]  When you were eight and you had bad traits, you'd go to school and learn the golden rules.
[03:43.000 --> 03:49.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool? If you get caught then you must get crewed!
[03:49.000 --> 03:54.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:54.000 --> 03:59.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:59.000 --> 04:08.000]  You took it on that one, you took it on this one, you took it on your mother and you took it on your father, you took it on your brother and you took it on your sister.
[04:08.000 --> 04:20.000]  Okay, howdy, howdy. This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, on this Thursday, the 17th day of November, 2016.
[04:20.000 --> 04:30.000]  And finally, after all of this time, all the politicking and maneuvering, today I went down and filed first degree felony,
[04:30.000 --> 04:36.000]  aggravated assault charges against my local district judge.
[04:36.000 --> 04:44.000]  It'll be a Christmas present for him because they won't get to it until next week, I'm sorry, next month,
[04:44.000 --> 04:55.000]  because they only meet once a month and the package, packet I gave them was a bit too big for them to get through today.
[04:55.000 --> 05:03.000]  So, next month we'll find out if I get anybody indicted or not.
[05:03.000 --> 05:15.000]  And I have to say, I certainly do not mind the wait because while I'm waiting, so are they.
[05:15.000 --> 05:27.000]  I also gave a copy of it to the local newspaper and it is, I know the owner of that newspaper, the last time I talked to him,
[05:27.000 --> 05:40.000]  the last word he said to me was, get out. Just because I told him, if it's news, you won't print it.
[05:40.000 --> 05:49.000]  The guys got no sense of humor, but I doubt that they'll print anything about it because anything that really is news in these small towns,
[05:49.000 --> 05:58.000]  anything about someone of any stature negative, he's not going to print it because he doesn't want anybody upset at him.
[05:58.000 --> 06:09.000]  But at least I've got it out there. I charged the judge with first degree felony aggravated assault because he had abated touch me.
[06:09.000 --> 06:18.000]  And he was just in the process of being smart-mouthed and arrogant and now we'll see how that all works out for him.
[06:18.000 --> 06:23.000]  So we do have a bunch of callers already, so I won't spend too much time on that.
[06:23.000 --> 06:38.000]  Just that I filed against the judge and the reason I used this particular complaint is that I could file it with a Texas Ranger.
[06:38.000 --> 06:51.000]  And the Texas Ranger, according to the protocols established by the Department of Public Safety for the Texas Rangers
[06:51.000 --> 07:06.000]  in order to allow them to comply with the new law that transferred the public integrity units from the prosecuting attorneys to the Texas Rangers.
[07:06.000 --> 07:14.000]  In order to facilitate this, the director of the Department of Public Safety established a protocol that required Texas Rangers
[07:14.000 --> 07:22.000]  to seek permission from the prosecuting attorney before investigating a public official.
[07:22.000 --> 07:34.000]  And the reason they did that is prior to this time, a Texas Ranger could not take a complaint against a public official.
[07:34.000 --> 07:42.000]  He could not even investigate a public official without the written permission of the director of the Department of Public Safety himself.
[07:42.000 --> 07:49.000]  Well, this statute that removed the public integrity unit from the district attorney's office
[07:49.000 --> 07:58.000]  and moved it to the Texas Rangers took away that power on the part of the director of the Department of Public Safety
[07:58.000 --> 08:03.000]  to politically control investigations against public officials.
[08:03.000 --> 08:11.000]  So he established a policy that required Texas Rangers to get permission from prosecuting attorneys.
[08:11.000 --> 08:21.000]  Problem, Article 2.03, Code of Criminal Procedure specifically prohibits a prosecuting attorney
[08:21.000 --> 08:30.000]  from investigating into a criminal accusation against a public official.
[08:30.000 --> 08:38.000]  He is required to forward that directly to reduce the complaint to an information and submit it to the grand jury.
[08:38.000 --> 08:42.000]  So he has no discretion.
[08:42.000 --> 08:51.000]  But the director of the Department of Public Safety is asking his Rangers to encourage the prosecuting attorney
[08:51.000 --> 08:55.000]  to exercise the discretion he does not have.
[08:55.000 --> 09:04.000]  That sounds like conspiracy to commit to me, and that's what I charged the Ranger with and the director.
[09:04.000 --> 09:08.000]  I also charged the Ranger with official oppression.
[09:08.000 --> 09:11.000]  And now we'll see how that works.
[09:11.000 --> 09:21.000]  The whole purpose of all of that was to put the Department of Public Safety in a position to where they would have no choice but to change their protocols.
[09:21.000 --> 09:25.000]  Okay, enough of that. We've got a whole board full of callers today.
[09:25.000 --> 09:30.000]  So I'm going to go to Olivier in Tennessee.
[09:30.000 --> 09:35.000]  Excuse me. Hello, Olivier. What do you have for us today?
[09:35.000 --> 09:37.000]  How are you doing, Randy?
[09:37.000 --> 09:42.000]  I had court and just missed my complaint.
[09:42.000 --> 09:44.000]  But let me give you the back.
[09:44.000 --> 09:47.000]  Okay. Okay. Hold on. Which complaints?
[09:47.000 --> 09:55.000]  On the 14th, I put in a motion for the amendment.
[09:55.000 --> 09:59.000]  No, no, no. You're not telling us which case.
[09:59.000 --> 10:02.000]  It was two cases. Well, there's three cases in all.
[10:02.000 --> 10:10.000]  But the ones that were affected this past week were the auto transport where they took my house in the city
[10:10.000 --> 10:20.000]  and the false imprisonment where they arrested me when they stopped one of my friends and I stopped to check up on her.
[10:20.000 --> 10:24.000]  And then they wanted to come and counter me and then I called the police on them.
[10:24.000 --> 10:31.000]  And they arrested me for calling 911 and spending a license. That case.
[10:31.000 --> 10:41.000]  Okay. So did the judge who dismissed the case concerning your property that was destroyed,
[10:41.000 --> 10:48.000]  did he provide findings of fact and conclusions of law?
[10:48.000 --> 11:06.000]  Findings of fact? No. He just dismissed it. I mean, he awarded their motion for dismissal.
[11:06.000 --> 11:19.000]  Rule 12. Yeah. Rule 12.02. It's an involuntary dismissal basically.
[11:19.000 --> 11:24.000]  Okay. Did he dismiss with prejudice? No.
[11:24.000 --> 11:31.000]  Did he tell you? Okay. This is in the FAD. This is in the state, right?
[11:31.000 --> 11:43.000]  Okay. So in the FAD, a case is not dismissed until there is a judgment.
[11:43.000 --> 11:49.000]  And they make a distinction between an order and a judgment.
[11:49.000 --> 11:57.000]  An order is the ruling that he makes. A judgment is findings of fact and conclusions of law
[11:57.000 --> 12:07.000]  where he states the facts that are before the court and addresses the law as it applies to those facts.
[12:07.000 --> 12:18.000]  If you didn't get that from the judge, then depending on how the rules read in Tennessee,
[12:18.000 --> 12:27.000]  in Texas, you can ask for a, you can file a motion for reconsideration.
[12:27.000 --> 12:33.000]  And that has the same effect as filing a motion for a new trial.
[12:33.000 --> 12:42.000]  They would both be the same thing. Or you can ask for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
[12:42.000 --> 12:50.000]  All three of those have essentially the same effect in that they stop the appeal clock.
[12:50.000 --> 12:56.000]  Generally you have like in the FAD and in the FAD you have 10 days,
[12:56.000 --> 13:01.000]  in the state of Texas you have 30 days to file a notice of appeal.
[13:01.000 --> 13:08.000]  If you file a motion for findings of fact, that stops that. It stops that clock.
[13:08.000 --> 13:21.000]  Then once the judge rules, either provides findings of facts or refuses to file an order denying your motion,
[13:21.000 --> 13:27.000]  once he does that, then the clock, the appeals clock starts again.
[13:27.000 --> 13:35.000]  You can't appeal this case if you don't have findings of fact and conclusions of law.
[13:35.000 --> 13:42.000]  You don't know what to appeal.
[13:42.000 --> 13:45.000]  Are you serious?
[13:45.000 --> 13:52.000]  Yeah. On what basis did he dismiss your case?
[13:52.000 --> 14:07.000]  The basis that he appealed my case was that he said that Clarksville had immunity from suit
[14:07.000 --> 14:13.000]  and I failed to state a claim. I didn't make proper claims.
[14:13.000 --> 14:18.000]  Did he state what was missing in your claim?
[14:18.000 --> 14:20.000]  No.
[14:20.000 --> 14:34.000]  Did he state, now you, in your suit, you cited statute and case law that showed that in this circumstance
[14:34.000 --> 14:37.000]  the city did not have immunity, didn't you?
[14:37.000 --> 14:39.000]  Yes.
[14:39.000 --> 14:47.000]  Did he state any statute or case law to refute what you put in your plea?
[14:47.000 --> 14:50.000]  Who, the attorney or the judge?
[14:50.000 --> 14:52.000]  Judge.
[14:52.000 --> 14:53.000]  No.
[14:53.000 --> 14:59.000]  You should file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge for misfeasance in office.
[14:59.000 --> 15:11.000]  When you file a motion for findings of fact and conclusions of law, essentially you write your own.
[15:11.000 --> 15:15.000]  You say, these are the facts that are before the court.
[15:15.000 --> 15:18.000]  This is the law that applies to those facts.
[15:18.000 --> 15:25.000]  This is the decision you should have come to and you ask the court to either write you a findings of fact
[15:25.000 --> 15:33.000]  and conclusions of law or accept the findings of fact and conclusions of law that you supplied
[15:33.000 --> 15:37.000]  and reverse your ruling.
[15:37.000 --> 15:44.000]  And one of the things that does is it gets you a step down the road toward your appeal
[15:44.000 --> 15:56.000]  because you've already brought those facts before the court, the facts and law before the court in the form of a brief.
[15:56.000 --> 16:00.000]  Do you understand how to write a brief?
[16:00.000 --> 16:01.000]  No.
[16:01.000 --> 16:03.000]  I know that's in the appeal process.
[16:03.000 --> 16:05.000]  I'm about to go read up on that.
[16:05.000 --> 16:15.000]  Read up on that and use your findings of fact and conclusions of law or if you ask for a new trial,
[16:15.000 --> 16:22.000]  you give him the findings of fact and conclusions anyway and say, this is why you should give me a new trial.
[16:22.000 --> 16:23.000]  Go ahead.
[16:23.000 --> 16:26.000]  Why wouldn't I want to appeal?
[16:26.000 --> 16:28.000]  You do want to appeal.
[16:28.000 --> 16:31.000]  But what are you going to appeal?
[16:31.000 --> 16:36.000]  I'm going to appeal that I have to finish telling you what happened.
[16:36.000 --> 16:37.000]  No, no.
[16:37.000 --> 16:38.000]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[16:38.000 --> 16:41.000]  Let me go to the – we're about to go to break.
[16:41.000 --> 16:43.000]  We'll get – pick this up on the other side.
[16:43.000 --> 16:44.000]  This is Randy Kelton.
[16:44.000 --> 16:46.000]  We'll be live on the radio.
[16:46.000 --> 16:48.000]  We'll be right back.
[16:48.000 --> 16:50.000]  Find the old facts.
[16:50.000 --> 16:51.000]  Okay.
[17:21.000 --> 17:22.000]  Yummy apple.
[17:22.000 --> 17:27.000]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:27.000 --> 17:33.000]  I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:33.000 --> 17:34.000]  Bye bye, yucky cookies.
[17:34.000 --> 17:42.000]  Now I go to logosradio.network.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side, bookmark the link,
[17:42.000 --> 17:47.000]  and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies.
[17:47.000 --> 17:49.000]  New cookies for me?
[17:49.000 --> 17:51.000]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[17:51.000 --> 17:57.000]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network, too.
[17:57.000 --> 17:58.000]  Cheers for cookies.
[17:58.000 --> 18:00.000]  Cheers for classified.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 19:00.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradio.com.
[19:11.000 --> 19:34.000]  Look what we got, who we are, it's the Christians. You know what I had, they don't have an answer.
[19:34.000 --> 19:42.000]  We are asking the questions. Look what we got, we don't have an answer.
[19:42.000 --> 19:44.000]  Let's hope there's a different side.
[19:44.000 --> 19:48.000]  I'm not going to shoot my feet on how they want me to.
[19:48.000 --> 19:50.000]  Okay, we are back.
[19:50.000 --> 19:54.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Olivier in Tennessee.
[19:54.000 --> 19:59.000]  Okay, go ahead, Olivier, you hadn't told me everything you said.
[19:59.000 --> 20:07.000]  Yeah, because I understand your concept, right, but one, I'm a novice at this, and I got a lot of clues coming up.
[20:07.000 --> 20:16.000]  And to do everything in detail like you're doing, it's not going to throw me off, but I don't have any details to learn it from you over the phone.
[20:16.000 --> 20:21.000]  But this is what happened on the 14th, I went to court, filed my motion.
[20:21.000 --> 20:30.000]  He dismissed my motion because the state argued that what I put in the amended pleading was not going to be sufficient, it was vague.
[20:30.000 --> 20:35.000]  So the judge agreed on it, and he denied my amendment.
[20:35.000 --> 20:46.000]  Then he said that I had a motion for default judgment against the tone company that day.
[20:46.000 --> 20:55.000]  And then he said, well, he's not hearing that motion that day, he's going to hear it tomorrow along with the other court date.
[20:55.000 --> 21:01.000]  I'm not supposed to file court dates different from each other.
[21:01.000 --> 21:14.000]  So basically, he refused to hear that motion on the 14th against auto transport, against the tone company, and moved it to the 15th, the following day.
[21:14.000 --> 21:33.000]  So the following day we come in, and the following day we had to deal with a motion from the city for dismissal 12.02 for both cases of the cars and the false imprisonment by the officers.
[21:33.000 --> 21:40.000]  So as we're debating, I put all the facts out there, why they lost their immunities and everything.
[21:40.000 --> 21:52.000]  And the judge decided with the city and said that, well, due to me not stating proper claims, he's dismissing the case.
[21:52.000 --> 21:54.000]  So I'm saying, okay.
[21:54.000 --> 22:02.000]  And I'm like, wait a minute, what about the motion for the tone company?
[22:02.000 --> 22:14.000]  And he said that, oh, well, the motion for the tone company is going to be dismissed because the city represents the tone company.
[22:14.000 --> 22:26.000]  But during our arguments, as we were arguing those motions, I made sure that I accused that the city was trying to represent all the defendants in this case.
[22:26.000 --> 22:37.000]  And the city attorney representing the city came up there and said, no, Your Honor, I'm not representing anyone else except Clarkville City.
[22:37.000 --> 22:45.000]  I don't represent any other defendant.
[22:45.000 --> 22:57.000]  So this happened within like a 15-minute period to where he says that he doesn't represent anyone. He's not trying to represent anyone. He was just mentioning things in his suit.
[22:57.000 --> 23:05.000]  It sounded like he was trying to represent them and then asking me to dismiss the case against the other defendants also.
[23:05.000 --> 23:13.000]  If you don't represent them, how are you going to ask for me for the case to be dismissed against them?
[23:13.000 --> 23:26.000]  Then at the end for the judge to say that, oh, well, I'm dismissing that motion too, because the city represents the tone company.
[23:26.000 --> 23:35.000]  So with all those facts, I understand your procedure, but I'm like, if I appeal it, that should be a win on the face, shouldn't it?
[23:35.000 --> 23:40.000]  Absolutely. You should file criminally against the judge.
[23:40.000 --> 23:48.000]  I know. Okay. I understand that. But see, the thing is you're interjecting more because of me, I go into things in depth.
[23:48.000 --> 23:53.000]  So when you're telling me this stuff, I'm okay. I've got a lot on my plate and I'm trying to get it done.
[23:53.000 --> 23:56.000]  Now you want me to do some more stuff. I need a little bit more.
[23:56.000 --> 24:00.000]  Okay. Hold on. Hold on. You can't short circuit this.
[24:00.000 --> 24:07.000]  I understand. I don't want to short circuit people's time on the radio either.
[24:07.000 --> 24:11.000]  Okay. You can't short circuit your appeal.
[24:11.000 --> 24:20.000]  Okay. If the judge did not say why he dismissed the case, you don't know what to appeal.
[24:20.000 --> 24:28.000]  And this will buy you more time to get your appeal put together correctly.
[24:28.000 --> 24:40.000]  That was the point of it, is why you asked for a findings of fact, because it stops the clock and gives you time to work on your appeal.
[24:40.000 --> 24:54.000]  Okay. I understand that process. But just because the attorney argued that he's not representing any of the defendants, I served every one of them by the code.
[24:54.000 --> 24:59.000]  You had a right to default. That's pretty straightforward.
[24:59.000 --> 25:07.000]  So wouldn't they amend if I argued that on appeal, because you said that I can't get paid by both defendants.
[25:07.000 --> 25:11.000]  Right. You only need to get paid by one. That's all you care about.
[25:11.000 --> 25:21.000]  Exactly. So by the city attorney, by the city saying that they do not represent them, the auto action never filed an answer to the complaint.
[25:21.000 --> 25:28.000]  They never documented an answer to the complaint.
[25:28.000 --> 25:38.000]  Okay. It appears as though the judge clearly acted for the purpose of protecting the public employees.
[25:38.000 --> 26:01.000]  And while the judge cannot be sued, because he denied you in your default judgment, the judgment you had a right to, he denied you in the due process, in the due course of the laws, acting under the color or pretense of an official capacity.
[26:01.000 --> 26:05.000]  That's a crime in every state.
[26:05.000 --> 26:15.000]  Now, while you can't sue him, you can certainly petition the grand jury to indict him for that.
[26:15.000 --> 26:16.000]  Okay.
[26:16.000 --> 26:23.000]  And that's very likely to change every other judge's perspective when they come to you.
[26:23.000 --> 26:30.000]  Okay. I would like to do that, but my first priority is getting my stuff back, because that's where my livelihood is coming from.
[26:30.000 --> 26:40.000]  Right now, I've got my baby brother supporting me, which I'm grateful for, but I need to get this ball rolling so I can sit down and do everything else.
[26:40.000 --> 26:42.000]  Right now, I'm uncomfortable.
[26:42.000 --> 26:48.000]  Okay. I don't understand what that means relative to the suit.
[26:48.000 --> 27:06.000]  Well, relative to the suit is I want to hurry up, go down the fastest avenue. I figure since I already have the default judgment and everything's on record, you have the city saying that we do not represent anyone else.
[27:06.000 --> 27:19.000]  We were just stating facts, and the judge denied my suit without giving all the defendants proper time to answer the suit, which is unlawful.
[27:19.000 --> 27:28.000]  The mayor did not answer. The six cops didn't answer. Auto Transport and the Tone Company didn't answer.
[27:28.000 --> 27:38.000]  On both suits, violations occurred. So you have a right to default judgment on all of those parties?
[27:38.000 --> 27:45.000]  Well, not all of those. They didn't have a chance to answer the suit back, to write an answer back.
[27:45.000 --> 27:52.000]  The Tone Company fell in default. They didn't answer anything.
[27:52.000 --> 27:56.000]  Wait. Who didn't have a chance to answer?
[27:56.000 --> 28:06.000]  The mayor and the cops. The mayor and the cops didn't answer. My false imprisonment suit.
[28:06.000 --> 28:09.000]  Why did they not have a chance to answer?
[28:09.000 --> 28:15.000]  Because once I served them, they had 30 days to answer.
[28:15.000 --> 28:28.000]  As I served them, they dismissed it. When they dismissed it, it was 15 days. They had another 15 days to answer the suit.
[28:28.000 --> 28:37.000]  So the judge dismissed the suit granting them an immunity they did not claim?
[28:37.000 --> 28:40.000]  Yes.
[28:40.000 --> 28:45.000]  That's the judge advocating for the defendants?
[28:45.000 --> 28:47.000]  Yes.
[28:47.000 --> 28:53.000]  So how did this get to something that doesn't fit right here?
[28:53.000 --> 29:05.000]  How do we have a hearing on your accusations against these people before their time to answer has told?
[29:05.000 --> 29:13.000]  I was in court with the city.
[29:13.000 --> 29:28.000]  Okay. Was the issue of the complaints against these officials who didn't answer on the docket?
[29:28.000 --> 29:30.000]  No.
[29:30.000 --> 29:37.000]  So the judge, Justice Suiz Bonte, dismissed your case out of hand?
[29:37.000 --> 29:43.000]  Against everyone else. It was only the city that day.
[29:43.000 --> 29:51.000]  Hang on. I'm not sure I'm getting the facts in the right place. Hang on. We're about to go to break.
[29:51.000 --> 30:01.000]  We'll be right back.
[30:01.000 --> 30:08.000]  We usually think of hackers as geniuses, but this guy's hankering for a Big Mac landed him in the slammer.
[30:08.000 --> 30:14.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with the story of the hungry hacker and how the FBI caught him.
[30:14.000 --> 30:24.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:24.000 --> 30:32.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:32.000 --> 30:43.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[30:43.000 --> 30:48.000]  If you're using public Wi-Fi to wreak havoc, leave the credit card at home.
[30:48.000 --> 30:56.000]  Just ask Jason Cornish, an IT guy who devastated his company's entire computer infrastructure after they fired his friend.
[30:56.000 --> 31:05.000]  Cornish traveled to another state to do the dirty deed, but the FBI easily tracked the crime to an IP address assigned to a McDonald's in Smyrna, Georgia.
[31:05.000 --> 31:13.000]  When they got ahold of the purchase records, they found a $5 meal charged to Cornish's Visa card just five minutes before the break-in.
[31:13.000 --> 31:22.000]  Cornish now faces up to 10 years in prison and a massive fine. The moral of the story? Be an honest employee, of course, and buy your burgers with cash.
[31:22.000 --> 31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.000 --> 31:36.000]  Did you know there are three million edible food plants on Earth, and none have the nutritional value of the hemp plant?
[31:36.000 --> 31:45.000]  HempUSA.org offers you hemp protein powder. It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-GMO, and is 100% gluten-free.
[31:45.000 --> 31:51.000]  Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein, and feeds the body the nutrients it needs.
[31:51.000 --> 32:00.000]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at HempUSA.org.
[32:00.000 --> 32:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.000 --> 32:12.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.000 --> 32:19.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.000 --> 32:25.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.000 --> 32:35.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.000 --> 32:40.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.000 --> 32:47.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:47.000 --> 32:50.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.000 --> 32:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.000 --> 33:02.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.000 --> 33:13.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:13.000 --> 33:19.000]  Yeah, Mr. Officer, you're taking the law in the hand.
[33:19.000 --> 33:23.000]  Won't you follow the law of the land?
[33:23.000 --> 33:26.000]  I don't understand.
[33:26.000 --> 33:31.000]  Your job is to protect and preserve, not beat and abuse.
[33:31.000 --> 33:34.000]  Officer!
[33:34.000 --> 33:40.000]  When you're gonna stop abuse, you know how I work.
[33:40.000 --> 33:45.000]  When you're gonna stop abuse, you know how I work.
[33:45.000 --> 33:51.000]  When you're gonna stop abuse, you know how I work.
[33:51.000 --> 33:56.000]  When you're gonna stop abuse, you know how I work.
[33:56.000 --> 34:02.000]  So please, Mr. Michael, teach officers not to abuse the power.
[34:02.000 --> 34:07.000]  Send a request to the leader, the captain of all officers.
[34:07.000 --> 34:13.000]  Tell them to uphold the law, or please don't abuse their power.
[34:13.000 --> 34:15.000]  Okay, we are back.
[34:15.000 --> 34:20.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Olivier in Tennessee.
[34:20.000 --> 34:26.000]  I'm not sure exactly where we are here.
[34:26.000 --> 34:34.000]  You had an issue before the court, and that issue before the court was your
[34:34.000 --> 34:40.000]  suit against the city for knocking your building down?
[34:40.000 --> 34:43.000]  No.
[34:43.000 --> 34:45.000]  Not knocking the building down.
[34:45.000 --> 34:47.000]  I haven't wrote that suit yet.
[34:47.000 --> 34:54.000]  I divided it up because they took the cars off of my property, then knocked the building down.
[34:54.000 --> 34:57.000]  Okay, so this one was about the cars.
[34:57.000 --> 34:58.000]  Right.
[34:58.000 --> 35:00.000]  I haven't wrote the one up for my property yet.
[35:00.000 --> 35:11.000]  And they also argued that my time limitation has passed because it started when the
[35:11.000 --> 35:16.000]  administration hearing happened in the buildings and codes department.
[35:16.000 --> 35:20.000]  That is not a court of law.
[35:20.000 --> 35:27.000]  How could that toll some type of time for me to file for inverse condemnation?
[35:27.000 --> 35:33.000]  Well, it wouldn't start until they actually took some action.
[35:33.000 --> 35:34.000]  Exactly.
[35:34.000 --> 35:38.000]  That's why I'm looking at the attorney like this, and the judge like this was
[35:38.000 --> 35:41.000]  recorded, but yes, that's what happened.
[35:41.000 --> 35:50.000]  And on that suit, there's two individuals, auto action and the city.
[35:50.000 --> 35:54.000]  Two individuals on that suit.
[35:54.000 --> 35:57.000]  The city never responded.
[35:57.000 --> 36:00.000]  I mean, the auto action, the towing company never responded.
[36:00.000 --> 36:01.000]  Okay.
[36:01.000 --> 36:11.000]  If the judge ruled that the city attorney was representing the towing company,
[36:11.000 --> 36:19.000]  sue the mayor and the attorney personally for misappropriation of public funds,
[36:19.000 --> 36:22.000]  that would break them from sucking eggs.
[36:22.000 --> 36:24.000]  And the attorney?
[36:24.000 --> 36:30.000]  Yeah, then the attorney is going to come back and say, I was not representing the...
[36:30.000 --> 36:37.000]  No, they said that, the attorney said that he ran, like once I accused him of
[36:37.000 --> 36:43.000]  doing that in the hearing, he ran up there and he said, no, Your Honor, those
[36:43.000 --> 36:45.000]  were just facts I was pointing out.
[36:45.000 --> 36:47.000]  I'm not trying to defend anyone.
[36:47.000 --> 36:49.000]  I don't represent anyone else.
[36:49.000 --> 36:53.000]  The only person I represent is the city of Clarksville.
[36:53.000 --> 36:59.000]  So this judge acted absolutely beyond his authority.
[36:59.000 --> 37:06.000]  He had no authority to deny you summary judgment, I mean, default judgment.
[37:06.000 --> 37:13.000]  And besides, was the default judgment on this party even before the court?
[37:13.000 --> 37:14.000]  Yes.
[37:14.000 --> 37:15.000]  Okay.
[37:15.000 --> 37:20.000]  On auto transfer.
[37:20.000 --> 37:21.000]  Okay.
[37:21.000 --> 37:25.000]  So this was before the court, that's where I was getting things confused.
[37:25.000 --> 37:30.000]  Well, here's the thing though, it was before the court on the 14th.
[37:30.000 --> 37:32.000]  He moved it to the 15th.
[37:32.000 --> 37:35.000]  He said, he told me he was not going to hear it.
[37:35.000 --> 37:38.000]  He's going to move it to the 15th.
[37:38.000 --> 37:42.000]  So he moved it to the 15th so he could deny it.
[37:42.000 --> 37:52.000]  Okay, well, that should be easy enough, is you had a right to default judgment.
[37:52.000 --> 37:58.000]  He had a right to default judgment and he also cannot, in Tennessee, in the appeals court,
[37:58.000 --> 38:06.000]  he cannot dismiss a process litigant for failure to state a claim.
[38:06.000 --> 38:08.000]  Well, that should be easy.
[38:08.000 --> 38:18.000]  And you may be right, that may be enough to get it turned over.
[38:18.000 --> 38:23.000]  So if you want to move this along, go ahead and file the appeal.
[38:23.000 --> 38:27.000]  And I can get that, I can pay for the record, right?
[38:27.000 --> 38:29.000]  I think like $5 to get a recording.
[38:29.000 --> 38:38.000]  If you have been determined indigent, you don't have to pay for the record.
[38:38.000 --> 38:41.000]  Okay.
[38:41.000 --> 38:46.000]  All you have to do is request it.
[38:46.000 --> 39:02.000]  So does that mean what happens on the other suit with the city and the officers, because I served the officers and it's only been 15 days into the time that I've been served?
[39:02.000 --> 39:07.000]  Well, the judge dismissed them sui sponte.
[39:07.000 --> 39:15.000]  That one should give judicial conduct complaint against the judge and also criminal charges against the judge.
[39:15.000 --> 39:23.000]  And that should be a relatively easy appeal.
[39:23.000 --> 39:25.000]  Okay.
[39:25.000 --> 39:35.000]  Criminal charges against the judge, especially when you're pursuing a grand jury, as far as the judge is concerned, that is a really big deal.
[39:35.000 --> 39:45.000]  I just did that to my district judge here in Texas and the judge is really, really unhappy.
[39:45.000 --> 39:46.000]  It's a long story.
[39:46.000 --> 39:54.000]  So what he did afterward to indicate how concerned he is, but he's truly concerned.
[39:54.000 --> 40:06.000]  He's afraid that there's a chance I just might get somebody on that grand jury who happens not to like him for some reason and sway the grand jury to indict.
[40:06.000 --> 40:09.000]  This scares him.
[40:09.000 --> 40:10.000]  I got you.
[40:10.000 --> 40:14.000]  I'm really hearing what you're saying about getting them and I really want to do it.
[40:14.000 --> 40:24.000]  Well, just take the same appeal you filed with the court of appeals.
[40:24.000 --> 40:35.000]  That establishes the wrongdoing and just send that to the grand jury, along with just make up a criminal affidavit.
[40:35.000 --> 40:40.000]  You take the statement you send to the court of appeals.
[40:40.000 --> 40:44.000]  Okay, so this ain't something you can do now.
[40:44.000 --> 40:46.000]  I do the appeal first, get that information.
[40:46.000 --> 40:55.000]  So when I do the appeal, I have time to relax and focus and concern myself with other law and learn how to write up the complaint against the judge.
[40:55.000 --> 41:00.000]  You just want to go after the judge before you have to go back into court.
[41:00.000 --> 41:11.000]  It doesn't matter if you're going back into court for this judge or another one. When you file against this judge, every judge in the state is going to know you did that.
[41:11.000 --> 41:19.000]  I can assure you what I just filed with the grand jury today, every judge in the state of Texas is going to know about it.
[41:19.000 --> 41:23.000]  And most likely every one of them will read it.
[41:23.000 --> 41:30.000]  I have some other cases that he dismissed the responsibility that I could sue him for too.
[41:30.000 --> 41:36.000]  This ain't the only one, but those other ones I just threw in just to let him know that I was coming at him.
[41:36.000 --> 41:41.000]  This one, I really care about it and I want my property back so I can start making my income again.
[41:41.000 --> 41:47.000]  Well, you might file a criminal complaint for each one of them and stagger them.
[41:47.000 --> 41:51.000]  You do one, then you do the next, then you do the next.
[41:51.000 --> 41:57.000]  The first one, they're going to say, oh, well, he's just upset because he didn't like the decision.
[41:57.000 --> 42:01.000]  The second one, they're going to likely to say, whoa, hold on here.
[42:01.000 --> 42:06.000]  And by the third one, that's establishing a pattern of misconduct.
[42:06.000 --> 42:09.000]  And these are real people just like you.
[42:09.000 --> 42:15.000]  They're not government officials and professionals.
[42:15.000 --> 42:17.000]  They're just ordinary people.
[42:17.000 --> 42:25.000]  And if they see them doing that to you, they're likely to expect them to do the same thing to them.
[42:25.000 --> 42:28.000]  You give them an opportunity to fix it.
[42:28.000 --> 42:31.000]  But yeah, I don't think you'll have any problem with an appeal.
[42:31.000 --> 42:34.000]  And don't be disappointed about the trial court.
[42:34.000 --> 42:37.000]  Never expect to win in the trial court anyway.
[42:37.000 --> 42:38.000]  Oh, no.
[42:38.000 --> 42:39.000]  I was kind of excited.
[42:39.000 --> 42:41.000]  That's why I was calling just to verify.
[42:41.000 --> 42:47.000]  And I'm like, as I came home and I thought about it, my day was calm and I told him what happened.
[42:47.000 --> 42:50.000]  And as I was telling him what happened, I was like, oh, I won.
[42:50.000 --> 42:55.000]  I just realized I won because he dismissed it and they haven't even submitted an answer.
[42:55.000 --> 42:58.000]  They can't submit an answer because it's past the date.
[42:58.000 --> 42:59.000]  Everything's on record.
[42:59.000 --> 43:00.000]  That's court rules.
[43:00.000 --> 43:03.000]  That's automatic.
[43:03.000 --> 43:09.000]  Yeah, never interfere with somebody when they're screwing up.
[43:09.000 --> 43:15.000]  Okay, so do you think I still need to push this finding of facts?
[43:15.000 --> 43:16.000]  I'm still going to research it.
[43:16.000 --> 43:19.000]  I'm going to research it, but do you think I need to push the finding?
[43:19.000 --> 43:20.000]  Check your rules.
[43:20.000 --> 43:22.000]  It may be a requirement.
[43:22.000 --> 43:24.000]  It is in Texas.
[43:24.000 --> 43:28.000]  Oh, check the rules with the appeal rules.
[43:28.000 --> 43:30.000]  Yeah, look at the rules of appellate procedure.
[43:30.000 --> 43:32.000]  They're generally not very long.
[43:32.000 --> 43:38.000]  And look at the rules for perfecting appeal.
[43:38.000 --> 43:41.000]  Okay.
[43:41.000 --> 43:44.000]  Okay, do you have anything more for us because we're about to go to break?
[43:44.000 --> 43:46.000]  No, I'll call that.
[43:46.000 --> 43:49.000]  I'll let somebody else get on and I'll try to get back on later.
[43:49.000 --> 43:52.000]  Okay, thank you, Olivier.
[43:52.000 --> 43:53.000]  Okay, we're going to break.
[43:53.000 --> 44:03.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, and Rue de la Radio, we'll be right back.
[44:03.000 --> 44:06.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com,
[44:06.000 --> 44:10.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street,
[44:10.000 --> 44:12.000]  Suite D here in Austin, Texas.
[44:12.000 --> 44:15.000]  I'm Brave New Books and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health
[44:15.000 --> 44:18.000]  and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:18.000 --> 44:21.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in
[44:21.000 --> 44:22.000]  alternative medicine.
[44:22.000 --> 44:24.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products,
[44:24.000 --> 44:28.000]  including our Australian EME oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps,
[44:28.000 --> 44:30.000]  and colloidal silver and gold.
[44:30.000 --> 44:37.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[44:37.000 --> 44:43.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.000 --> 44:47.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[44:47.000 --> 45:01.000]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[45:07.000 --> 45:12.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how
[45:12.000 --> 45:15.000]  in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:32.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of
[45:32.000 --> 45:34.000]  case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:38.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[45:38.000 --> 45:43.000]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:48.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for
[45:48.000 --> 45:52.000]  civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:02.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:02.000 --> 46:20.000]  If he did not have a problem, where do you want to put for one?
[46:20.000 --> 46:26.000]  If he could not wait any battle long, would you purposeless be done?
[46:26.000 --> 46:32.000]  Such a gentleman, a soldier, a warrior, a hunk of scuffle, and they keep the peace.
[46:32.000 --> 46:35.000]  All they're taking is a misunderstanding.
[46:35.000 --> 46:37.000]  Somebody calls the police.
[46:37.000 --> 46:40.000]  What's in the spotlight?
[46:43.000 --> 46:46.000]  What's in the spotlight?
[46:46.000 --> 46:52.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:52.000 --> 46:56.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rue de la Radio, and we're going to Jeff in Mississippi.
[46:56.000 --> 46:58.000]  Hello, Jeff.
[46:58.000 --> 47:03.000]  How are things going there down in Hillbilly land?
[47:03.000 --> 47:12.000]  Well, personally, it just feels like I'm in a dark spot, but according to you, all is going fine.
[47:12.000 --> 47:17.000]  I'm now ready to file...
[47:17.000 --> 47:27.000]  Well, to start over, I've got a Title 42 case, and it got dismissed with prejudice, and the judge did not give a reason.
[47:27.000 --> 47:37.000]  He just claimed that it was frivolous and they're going to grant summary judgment and a 12b6 both for the defendants.
[47:37.000 --> 47:43.000]  And he said that my claim was meritless, did not give a reason.
[47:43.000 --> 47:49.000]  You just told Olivier that you can't appeal if the judge doesn't give a reason.
[47:49.000 --> 47:52.000]  Oh, is this in the Fed?
[47:52.000 --> 47:53.000]  Yes.
[47:53.000 --> 47:55.000]  Then if the judge...
[47:55.000 --> 47:58.000]  Okay, the judge gave an order.
[47:58.000 --> 48:03.000]  In the Fed, there must be an order and a judgment.
[48:03.000 --> 48:07.000]  No final ruling until there's a judgment.
[48:07.000 --> 48:13.000]  And the judgment is required to be your findings, facts, and conclusions of the law.
[48:13.000 --> 48:17.000]  So they may not have sent it to you, so you might want to check pacer.
[48:17.000 --> 48:19.000]  No, I've got it.
[48:19.000 --> 48:21.000]  I've got the order and the judgment.
[48:21.000 --> 48:22.000]  There's nothing there.
[48:22.000 --> 48:27.000]  There's no reason, so I filed a motion for reconsideration.
[48:27.000 --> 48:28.000]  Okay.
[48:28.000 --> 48:38.000]  And once again, now the court reporter violated the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure and she did it blatantly.
[48:38.000 --> 48:43.000]  It says it right there and she turned right around and violated those rules.
[48:43.000 --> 48:48.000]  It's like running a stop sign in front of a thousand people.
[48:48.000 --> 48:51.000]  I claimed that she broke the law.
[48:51.000 --> 49:04.000]  And when the judge denied my motion for consideration, his only argument was that the court reporter legally got the extensions of time.
[49:04.000 --> 49:06.000]  But he didn't argue against me.
[49:06.000 --> 49:12.000]  He just basically said that she was legal and I'm saying that she's illegal.
[49:12.000 --> 49:20.000]  He didn't provide any law to establish that she was legal.
[49:20.000 --> 49:28.000]  No, he just said that she followed the correct procedure to grant the extensions and then just said that I, you know,
[49:28.000 --> 49:38.000]  Jeff from Mississippi is just arguing and reciting threadbare allegations from Twombly and Ashcroft.
[49:38.000 --> 49:40.000]  Well, that's 12b6.
[49:40.000 --> 49:43.000]  Everything in 12b6 is Twombly and Ashcroft.
[49:43.000 --> 49:46.000]  Yeah.
[49:46.000 --> 49:50.000]  Okay.
[49:50.000 --> 49:56.000]  So you asked for findings of fact and conclusions of all and he didn't give it to you?
[49:56.000 --> 49:59.000]  Well, I filed a motion for reconsideration.
[49:59.000 --> 50:00.000]  Is that the same thing?
[50:00.000 --> 50:02.000]  Yes, same thing.
[50:02.000 --> 50:03.000]  Okay.
[50:03.000 --> 50:04.000]  That's what I asked.
[50:04.000 --> 50:12.000]  I said clarification and he even said that Jeff from Mississippi demands clarification, you know, kind of like I'm being mean here.
[50:12.000 --> 50:18.000]  And then he just came back and said it was meritless and that I was rehashing arguments.
[50:18.000 --> 50:23.000]  Petition the Court of Appeals for Riddimandamus.
[50:23.000 --> 50:36.000]  Ask them to order the judge to provide findings of fact and conclusions at law so that you're able to file an effective appeal.
[50:36.000 --> 50:38.000]  Well, do I do that before the brief?
[50:38.000 --> 50:42.000]  Yes. You can't brief. You don't know what to brief.
[50:42.000 --> 50:46.000]  Okay. The brief is due in a week.
[50:46.000 --> 51:03.000]  Well, move the court for an extension of time and in the same request, ask the court to order the judge to provide you with findings of fact and conclusions of law.
[51:03.000 --> 51:05.000]  And that's a writ of mandamus?
[51:05.000 --> 51:16.000]  Yes. You're asking the court to mandate to a lower court and order them to do something the law requires them to do.
[51:16.000 --> 51:20.000]  Could I title it one adjoining the other?
[51:20.000 --> 51:27.000]  May I have an extension of time due to the requirement of Riddimandamus?
[51:27.000 --> 51:37.000]  Both in one document, yes. If you have your brief somewhat completed.
[51:37.000 --> 51:38.000]  Yes.
[51:38.000 --> 51:52.000]  Based on what you have, you can file that with this request for extension of time or make sure that within the time limit you file this,
[51:52.000 --> 52:00.000]  even if it's incomplete because even if it's incomplete you can file an amended appeal later.
[52:00.000 --> 52:12.000]  Okay. Well, I wanted to read to you my four issues that basically circulate around what we just talked about and that is the judge won't give me a straight answer.
[52:12.000 --> 52:23.000]  And issue number one is whether the district court erred when it granted the 12th B-6 motion to dismiss for the public defender. He's the one that didn't do anything.
[52:23.000 --> 52:29.000]  He did not stop the court reporter. He didn't force her to hand over the transcripts.
[52:29.000 --> 52:42.000]  So I named him in the suit and part A of that is Jeff from Mississippi's complaint clearly proved that the public defender clearly violated the law.
[52:42.000 --> 52:48.000]  And that's by refusing to act. That's an accessory after the fact, right?
[52:48.000 --> 52:51.000]  Not necessarily.
[52:51.000 --> 53:00.000]  Okay. It could just be malpractice. It's only an accessory after the fact if he acted in concert and collusion.
[53:00.000 --> 53:10.000]  Well, he did because during the three months that she disappeared, I notified him three times ordering him to go find her and demotion.
[53:10.000 --> 53:20.000]  No, no, no. Wait, wait. Still, still. Unless he colluded with the defendants, then he's not an accessory.
[53:20.000 --> 53:25.000]  Okay. Yeah. He could just be an idiot.
[53:25.000 --> 53:29.000]  Well, he wrote back that he refused.
[53:29.000 --> 53:35.000]  Okay. But still, there's no, you don't have any evidence that he colluded with the opposing party.
[53:35.000 --> 53:38.000]  God, it all changed that.
[53:38.000 --> 53:49.000]  So now he's just a malpractice idiot. So now you sue him for everything you lost in this case.
[53:49.000 --> 53:57.000]  Should this be changed to whether the district court erred when it granted the 12b6 motion for the public defender without clarifying
[53:57.000 --> 54:07.000]  or arguing that Jeff from Mississippi's complaint clearly proved that Holmes refused to act or that the public defender refused to act?
[54:07.000 --> 54:10.000]  That was a mouthful.
[54:10.000 --> 54:16.000]  That's a little too complex a question for me to answer quickly.
[54:16.000 --> 54:19.000]  Okay.
[54:19.000 --> 54:26.000]  Saying that the district court erred because it didn't even look into the issue. It never addressed it.
[54:26.000 --> 54:30.000]  That's due process. That's procedure due process.
[54:30.000 --> 54:39.000]  Okay. That's where I want to know if I can issue number two, whether the district court erred when it granted summary judgment for the court reporter
[54:39.000 --> 54:50.000]  without addressing the issues when it dismissed, in other words, it dismissed for summary judgment and it didn't even answer any of the issues.
[54:50.000 --> 54:52.000]  It didn't do the facts.
[54:52.000 --> 55:03.000]  Your claim would be since the judge refuses to give you findings of fact, you call that procedural due process.
[55:03.000 --> 55:07.000]  The court denied you due process.
[55:07.000 --> 55:13.000]  Oh, the court didn't, whether the district, wait, the court denied Jeff from Mississippi due process
[55:13.000 --> 55:19.000]  when it granted summary judgment for the court reporter without findings of facts.
[55:19.000 --> 55:27.000]  Right. Because now you don't know how to appeal it because you don't know what law and facts the judge relied on in making his ruling.
[55:27.000 --> 55:38.000]  And by failing to give you that, he denied you in your right to file an effective appeal and that's a procedural due process vote.
[55:38.000 --> 55:44.000]  And I can include that in that issue, what you just said?
[55:44.000 --> 55:46.000]  Absolutely.
[55:46.000 --> 56:00.000]  Okay. Number three, whether the district court erred when it dismissed Jeff from Mississippi's motion for reconsideration without clarification.
[56:00.000 --> 56:03.000]  I know.
[56:03.000 --> 56:07.000]  Because he didn't clarify anything. He just said it was maritalist and threw it out.
[56:07.000 --> 56:17.000]  Well, he didn't necessarily rule improperly just because he didn't clarify why he ruled.
[56:17.000 --> 56:25.000]  That's why you need clarification because you really don't know why he dismissed it.
[56:25.000 --> 56:29.000]  So could we reword that to be an issue?
[56:29.000 --> 56:32.000]  Okay. Read that again.
[56:32.000 --> 56:47.000]  Whether the district court erred when it dismissed Jeff from Mississippi's motion for reconsideration without clarification.
[56:47.000 --> 56:54.000]  And for part A, I've got the court did not give findings of facts and conclusions for the issues.
[56:54.000 --> 57:08.000]  Okay. This one then is redundant because you've already made that claim. You need to state facts and law as to why he should have ruled in your favor.
[57:08.000 --> 57:16.000]  And say the judge made this ruling in violation of standing law.
[57:16.000 --> 57:22.000]  Not because he didn't give clarification.
[57:22.000 --> 57:26.000]  He's saying that whatever his reasons were, you don't know what they are.
[57:26.000 --> 57:35.000]  They were wrong because this law, because the law says that he should have ruled in your favor.
[57:35.000 --> 57:42.000]  Okay. Do you know which law that would be so I could include that as the case law?
[57:42.000 --> 57:50.000]  No, no. This is your case. I'm not sure exactly what he ruled under 12b6.
[57:50.000 --> 58:00.000]  I have to see the pleadings from the other side to understand how he got to where he's at.
[58:00.000 --> 58:04.000]  It has to be based on the other side's pleadings.
[58:04.000 --> 58:09.000]  Well, that's the problem. There's no facts from the other side. He doesn't state anything.
[58:09.000 --> 58:14.000]  Does he have an argument in favor of dismissal?
[58:14.000 --> 58:21.000]  Yes, but the argument is that Jeff from Mississippi is totally merrily and doesn't know what he's doing.
[58:21.000 --> 58:27.000]  And they didn't stipulate how you were merrily. Okay, hang on. About to go to break.
[58:27.000 --> 58:34.000]  I'm getting a little confused here and exactly how to address this, but we'll figure it out on the other side.
[58:34.000 --> 58:50.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio. I call it number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:58.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:06.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the Recovery Version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:18.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:28.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free Recovery Version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:48.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:53.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:53.000 --> 01:00:01.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  Follow in these flashes brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly bulletins for the commodities market, Today in History, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:41.000]  Markets for Friday, the 4th of November, 2016, are currently trading with gold at $1,304.10 an ounce, silver $18.41 an ounce, Texas crude $44.66 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $697 U.S. currency.
[01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  Today in history, the year 1952, the United States government establishes the National Security Agency or NSA, an intelligence organization of the United States government responsible for global monitoring, collection, and processing of information and data for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes.
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  The NSA was established today in history.
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  In recent news, WikiLeaks just dumped part 30 of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta's hacked emails, bringing the total thus far to over $47,000.
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:26.000]  Julian Assange, who still is essentially on house arrest at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, gave an interview with Russia Today where he claims that the outcome of next Tuesday's presidential election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton has already been decided, saying,
[01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:35.000]  quote, Because he has had every establishment off his side, Trump does not have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment.
[01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, etc. are all united behind Hillary Clinton and the media as well, media owners and the journalists themselves.
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  This is days after political activists discovered a hidden website for WRCB, an NBC affiliate out of Chattanooga, Tennessee, showing election results with Hillary Clinton securing 343 electoral votes and 42% of the popular vote.
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:04.000]  Hillary, her campaign, and the media are accusing Russia for the hacking of tens of thousands of emails that WikiLeaks has dumped out in the past weeks.
[01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:08.000]  However, Julian Assange has vehemently denied any involvement from the Kremlin.
[01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  A majority of Hillary's hacked emails that have been released via WikiLeaks since March of 2016 can be searched through at WikiLeaks.org forward slash Clinton dash emails.
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  CBS News reported earlier today that U.S. intelligence agencies have alerted joint terrorism task forces that Al Qaeda could potentially be planning terrorist attacks in New York, Texas and Virginia for Monday, the day before the election, though no specific cities and landmarks are mentioned.
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:54.000]  Counterterrorism spokespersons have stated that as the election day nears, federal law enforcement is planning for several worst-case scenarios, while earlier this week an alert warned local police of polling places being seen as attractive targets for lone wolf type of attacks by individuals motivated by violent extremist ideologies, such as sovereign citizens.
[01:02:54.000 --> 01:03:05.000]  This was Ruth Brody with her lowdown for November 4, 2016.
[01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:34.000]  OK, we are back.
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:40.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Jeff in Mississippi.
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:57.000]  And you're asking me to be kind of specific on why they ruled that your claims were frivolous, and I don't know enough about the facts and how they stated them to be able to respond to that.
[01:03:57.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  Well, they never they didn't state any facts.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  All they did was they just accused me of twombly and Ashcroft just Jeff from Mississippi recited is reciting threadbare allegations and their insufficient recital of threadbare allegations are insufficient for, you know, claim and Jeff's meritless and he's just rehashing arguments.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  So therefore it's denied.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:32.000]  Literally, it's that's it over and over.
[01:04:32.000 --> 01:04:45.000]  It's as if I took you to the police and said, Randy Kelton just robbed a liquor store and you said, well, Jeff is just reciting threadbare allegations and he's meritless and he's just rehashing arguments.
[01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:59.000]  Okay, then this is a sounds like a good case to show what's wrong with Ashcroft Twombly.
[01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  Ashcroft Twombly, the court indicated that it wasn't their intent to raise the pleading standard. But what it has done is made an impossible pleading standard, a standard that goes strictly to the caprice of the judge.
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  Now there is no pleading standard that the judge gets to decide without support or supporting case law, whether or not he wants your suit to move forward or not.
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:51.000]  And this was not the intent of the law or the legislature. And Ashcroft Twombly has undermined your right to petition the court for redress of grievance.
[01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:52.000]  Okay.
[01:05:52.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  This should be a good case to get Ashcroft Twombly distinguished.
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  Well, I've got two more issues that are basically the same thing. He dismissed my case with prejudice.
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  So I put that down as an issue, whether the district court aired when it dismissed Jeff's case with prejudice without clarifying anything.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  And the thirdly or the lastly is I had three motions for sanctions against the attorneys for making false statements. He dismissed those and didn't even say why. He just said all three motions are meritless and therefore they're dismissed.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  And that's the only time he even mentions those. So that's five issues. I've got five issues, but they're all the same thing.
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:49.000]  If this person is not clarifying, would I use the term giving facts and conclusions or details?
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:59.000]  Okay. This is a good case to make an argument for distinguishing Ashcroft Twombly.
[01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  Okay.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  Ashcroft Twombly changed everything. And this is a case where it appears that the court has acted in outrageous disregard for pleading standards that Ashcroft Twombly kind of opened the door to give the judge discretion without any limitations on that discretion.
[01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  And you might hear or ask the court to distinguish Ashcroft Twombly and draw some lines so that a litigant can know when they have pled enough facts and law in order to overcome the ruling in Ashcroft Twombly.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  Because right now we have no clue.
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:54.000]  The only way I've been able to get past Ashcroft Twombly is with a declaratory judgment suit.
[01:07:54.000 --> 01:07:55.000]  Okay.
[01:07:55.000 --> 01:08:02.000]  And that's because it bypasses it all together. So you don't make any claims.
[01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  Okay. So each of you can basically be a repetition because it's all kind of the same thing. Just real quick for the listeners out there, could you reword one of the issues, whether let's say the district court erred when it dismissed Jeff's motions for sanctions?
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:26.000]  How would you finish that?
[01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:28.000]  He did it without clarification.
[01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  I would have to read the motions in order to have no idea how to answer that without actually looking at the motions.
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  Okay. Well, what about the 12b6 where they claim that they say that I failed a state claim and the judge says that's right.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  Okay, here's the deal with 12b6.
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:56.000]  We used to just have to make the claim. We didn't have to support it.
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:09:17.000]  And now after Ashcroft Twombly, now we have to come back and state enough facts to give the court reason to believe that you have a reasonable chance of prevailing in your case.
[01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:44.000]  Well, that's absolutely and totally arbitrary. And we need some direction so that we can determine when we have put in enough facts in law, or is it the intent of Ashcroft Twombly that we completely adjudicate the case in the original pleading?
[01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  And that's precisely what the Supreme said they did not intend by Ashcroft Twombly.
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:53.000]  Okay.
[01:09:53.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  And asked the court to give some guidance and that's primarily what the court's there to do.
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  Here they claim there wasn't sufficient facts and based on their dismissal with prejudice, the judge somehow determined that it was not possible to produce sufficient facts.
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  Okay.
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:41.000]  But I don't know exactly. I can't just write it off the top of my head on the air. I would have to read what's there to know how to really form that. That's a good place to go when you're asking the court to distinguish another case. That's what they like to do.
[01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  Can you do that in the argument section, the big section?
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:51.000]  You might put that into one of your questions.
[01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  Okay.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:11:07.000]  Does Ashcroft Twombly require a litigant to completely adjudicate every fact in law in the original petition?
[01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  Oh, so you can put that as one of the issues?
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:11.000]  Yes.
[01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:18.000]  Okay. I thought it always had to start off with whether the district court erred.
[01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:22.000]  No, see here you don't know if the district court erred.
[01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:24.000]  We don't have any direction here.
[01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:28.000]  Ashcroft Twombly is just kind of an open door.
[01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:36.000]  So when I write a petition, how do I know when I have enough facts in law?
[01:11:36.000 --> 01:11:40.000]  As it stands, there's no way to know.
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:43.000]  We need some clarification from the courts.
[01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  It was dismissed based on Ashcroft Twombly, so ask the court to distinguish Ashcroft Twombly.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  Okay. So I'll put that as one of the numerals.
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:11:58.000]  That's the kind of thing they like to look at.
[01:11:58.000 --> 01:12:00.000]  Got it. Okay. I did not understand that.
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:03.000]  I will type that up and then I'll call in next Thursday.
[01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:07.000]  Are you having a show next Thursday? Because I have to mail it Friday.
[01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:13.000]  Oh. No, probably not. That's Thanksgiving.
[01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:16.000]  Send it, email it to me. I'll look at it.
[01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:20.000]  Okay. I totally forgot. You're right. I will do that. Thank you.
[01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  I'll get off the air and I'll...
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:24.000]  Okay. And include your number so I can call you.
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  Okay.
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  Okey-doke. Okay. Thank you, Jeff.
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  Okay. Now we're going to Scott in Texas. Hello, Scott.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:37.000]  Howdy, howdy.
[01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  Howdy. What do you have for us today?
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:54.000]  Well, I got my Title 42 ready for Addison and I'm going to give them a nice, probably a Thanksgiving present.
[01:12:54.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  You're such a nice guy.
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:07.000]  Well, you know, I'm just thinking about them and all the nice people that they protect and serve the stuffing out of.
[01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  What a guy. What a guy. I bet they'll send you a Christmas card this year.
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  So how is it going with the judicial conduct and bar grievances?
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  Oh, I've bar-grieved everybody I could back to the Stone Age.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:37.000]  And I had one of the bar grievances on a district attorney.
[01:13:37.000 --> 01:13:43.000]  They said, oh, this doesn't rise to the level of the occasion, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
[01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  Do you want to appeal the decision? I was like, heck, yeah.
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  So I filled that out and backstabbed right back to them.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:54.000]  And at the bottom of that, you know, do you think the system is fair?
[01:13:54.000 --> 01:13:58.000]  And I said no. And if you said no, say why?
[01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:09.000]  I said, because I give a criminal complaint to everybody, the cops and the DEA, and nobody will take my criminal complaint.
[01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:14.000]  This is a criminal complaint on the DEA.
[01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  But my question is I want to file the Title 42 against Addison.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:26.000]  I'm on a payment plan because I'm paying them like 50 bucks a month.
[01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:34.000]  So I wanted to see, can I, when I submit to the federal judge,
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:53.000]  can I also submit a declaratory and an injunctive relief for them so that I can stop making that $50 payment until after this position of the civil case?
[01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:56.000]  Is that how you do that?
[01:14:56.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  Oh, okay. You're talking about the payment on the fines.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:08.000]  Yeah. No, this court's not going to have anything to say about that.
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:11.000]  They have no jurisdiction.
[01:15:11.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  They wouldn't be able to do no kind of injunctive relief or anything?
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:17.000]  No, I wouldn't think so.
[01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:22.000]  This is the difference between civil and criminal.
[01:15:22.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  You know, if you have a criminal case and you appeal it, say you appeal to, I mean, say you file a federal lawsuit,
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  the feds can say nothing about the criminal.
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  They have no jurisdiction whatsoever.
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:45.000]  This is a whole other animal.
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  I don't think you would get any traction there.
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:52.000]  I mean, you can try, certainly try.
[01:15:52.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  Well, no, if it's going to be being in the wind, I don't need to do that.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  So, well, shoot, then I guess there's no way to get around it.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  You still just got to keep making that $50 a month payment.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:14.000]  Yeah, until you can get the whole thing overturned maybe.
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  And you reminded me, I just got a response from the State Commission on Judicial Conduct on a judge
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:28.000]  and from the State Bar Association on a lawyer.
[01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:32.000]  It's got confidential written all over it.
[01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  Oh, they always say that.
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:45.000]  Okay, hang on, going to break, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Root of Our Radio, call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:45.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  I love logos.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:07.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:17:07.000 --> 01:17:08.000]  I need my truth fake.
[01:17:08.000 --> 01:17:10.000]  I'd be lost without logos.
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:13.000]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:16.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite,
[01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:22.000]  How can I help logos?
[01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:29.000]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos by ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:31.000]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:37.000]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  No.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  No.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:50.000]  No.
[01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:17:55.000]  This is perfect.
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:17:56.000]  Thank you so much.
[01:17:56.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  We are welcome.
[01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:50.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:50.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:20.000]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:20.000 --> 01:19:34.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:34.000 --> 01:19:39.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Scott in Texas.
[01:19:39.000 --> 01:19:50.000]  Scott, I just got a response from the Texas Bar Association on a complaint I filed against a lawyer
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:57.000]  while I maintained that the lawyer failed to act in accordance with Texas rules of disciplinary procedure
[01:19:57.000 --> 01:20:08.000]  in that the judge made a mistake from the bench and the lawyer failed to inform the court that it was acting improperly.
[01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  You'll never believe what they wrote me back.
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:17.000]  Lawyers licensed in Texas are governed by the Texas disciplinary rules of professional conduct
[01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:23.000]  and may only be disciplined when their conduct is in violation of one or more of the disciplinary rules.
[01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:29.000]  We have concluded that the conduct you described is not a violation of the disciplinary rules.
[01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  Can you imagine that?
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:39.000]  They examined into my accusation and find it does not rise to the level of misconduct.
[01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:44.000]  I can't believe they actually wrote that to me.
[01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  Since they told me I can appeal this, I'll send them a brief.
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:21:00.000]  I'm just wondering, what do they consider their rules of violating?
[01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:03.000]  Because you sent them a criminal complaint against one of them.
[01:21:03.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  It's like, no, this doesn't violate nothing.
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  It's all good.
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:07.000]  Nothing to say here.
[01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:08.000]  Move along.
[01:21:08.000 --> 01:21:14.000]  It doesn't make any difference what you filed with the state bar of Texas.
[01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:16.000]  It just makes no difference.
[01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:27.000]  The only time they will act against a lawyer is if a lawyer with a lot of clout files the complaint
[01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:34.000]  or a judge is mad at the lawyer or there's some political influence.
[01:21:34.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  Otherwise, they don't care.
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  They're just there to protect their lawyers.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  For our part, that works because their insurance company knows that I'll get a letter like this.
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:22:03.000]  Now, if I sue this lawyer and this lawyer hasn't notified her insurance carrier that I filed this complaint, she's not covered.
[01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:11.000]  If she notifies her insurance carrier, the way she acted was a brand new lawyer,
[01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:16.000]  they're going to cancel her malpractice insurance.
[01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:20.000]  So this works for me.
[01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:21.000]  Yeah.
[01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:25.000]  I love it when you said they have to tell on themselves.
[01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  I thought, oh, that is too good.
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  That is great fun.
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  Okay.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:35.000]  Anything else for us, Scott?
[01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  No.
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  I'll let you go.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:38.000]  All righty.
[01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  We got Don from New Mexico coming up and he's been kicking behind on the IRS.
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:47.000]  Let's go, Don.
[01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  Hey, Randy.
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  How are you, buddy?
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:50.000]  I am good.
[01:22:50.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  How is your campaign going?
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:57.000]  Well, the campaign's staying interesting.
[01:22:57.000 --> 01:23:11.000]  This week, I got a letter back from the FOIA request that I submitted in September asking for the supervisor's supervisor, right?
[01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  Name, title, and contact address for the supervisor of the supervisor of the IRS employee.
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  And they refused to give it to me.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:28.000]  So I'm writing a final complaint as we speak.
[01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:32.000]  Well, that's interesting.
[01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  Did they state a reason?
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  They did, a couple of them.
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  And in my criminal complaint, let's see here, the reason stated that all other personnel information would be withheld under FOIA Exemption B6.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  And if you go to 5 USC 552 B6, it's talking about personnel and medical files that if they were disclosed would clearly constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  And her second reason was based upon the criteria, I am unable to search your request.
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:27.000]  So she didn't understand what boss is boss meant?
[01:24:27.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  Well, she restated, I had three items on this FOIA request.
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  Item number one, I want the supervisor of the supervisor.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  I want his name, title, and contact information.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:45.000]  Item two was I was asking for an ID number of the supervisor.
[01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  And item three is I'm asking for the ID number of the IRS agent that issued the notice of levy originally.
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:25:05.000]  Now, ID numbers, if you look at her response to me, she says, feel free to contact Disclosure Specialist Kimberly Wilson ID number, blah, blah, blah.
[01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  So ID number is not a problem.
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  They give it out all the time.
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:21.000]  In fact, I've got a couple of different cards from the IRS employee that issued the notice of levy and extorted the money from my tenant that have different ID numbers on them with his name.
[01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:22.000]  Right?
[01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  So I'm trying to figure out, you know, what the heck is his ID number?
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:35.000]  And so I asked for the supervisor's name, title, ID number, and contact, you know, how to get a hold of them.
[01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  Where is he located?
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:45.000]  And apparently that's privileged information because somehow that's connected to personnel and medical files.
[01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  So I'm writing up a criminal complaint because that makes no sense to me at all.
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:53.000]  Okay.
[01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:57.000]  And what are you going to do with the criminal complaint?
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  I'm sending it to the person she told me to contact if I had questions.
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:03.000]  Oh, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:05.000]  No, no, no.
[01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  That's an IRS agent.
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  Yes.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:13.000]  Send the complaint to the U.S. attorney.
[01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:14.000]  Okay.
[01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:19.000]  And when the U.S. attorney, the U.S. attorney will do one of two things.
[01:26:19.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  The U.S. attorney will either trash it or refer you to an FBI agent.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:30.000]  Okay.
[01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:36.000]  But what I suggest is you send it to the U.S. attorney's office,
[01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  but you address it to the foreman of the federal grand jury.
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:42.000]  Okay.
[01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:50.000]  And put that little cover letter on there that asks the foreman to initial this and send it back to you to show that you got it.
[01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:59.000]  And ask the foreman, please do not sign this as the U.S. attorney has a rubber stamp with your name on it.
[01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  Now, you understand the position the U.S. attorney is in at the moment.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  Okay.
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:18.000]  You probably could not be in a better position than what you are right now because Trump won the election.
[01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:25.000]  And he is absolutely a wild card.
[01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  And this U.S. attorney has to submit his resignation to Trump.
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  Right.
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  So I'm not sending it to the U.S. attorney.
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:42.000]  I'm sending it to the foreman of the grand jury.
[01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  By way of the U.S. attorney's office because that's the only address you have for the grand jury.
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  So you don't need to address it to the U.S. attorney.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:27:55.000]  No.
[01:27:55.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  And tell him that here's a criminal complaint.
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:27:59.000]  No.
[01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  No.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  What you want him to do is misdirect the U.S. mail and open it himself.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:11.000]  And then he's likely to call you.
[01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  When I did that, the U.S. attorney called me and threatened to charge me with witness tampering.
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:24.000]  I told him, well, Bubba, knock yourself out.
[01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  We'll see how that works for you.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:34.000]  I'll charge you with witness tampering, obstruction of justice, tampering with the U.S. mail.
[01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  We'll see how that works for you because I sent it registered restricted.
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:41.000]  It doesn't matter how you send it.
[01:28:41.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  They take all of this mail to the mail room and the guy in the mail room signs for all of it.
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:53.000]  And the U.S. attorney, he's not even going to know what it is until he opens it.
[01:28:53.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  So he's going to open it and he's going to treat it like you sent it to him.
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:02.000]  He's not going to know you no better yet.
[01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:09.000]  And then when he secrets it from the grand jury, then you send a second one.
[01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  And this one's a complaint against him.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:15.000]  And he's going to open it.
[01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  And when he opens it, he's going to say, oops, this isn't good.
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:29.000]  That's when we got the IRS agent in Fort Lauderdale fired.
[01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:31.000]  OK.
[01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:37.000]  So the way I was looking at it is, yeah, go ahead.
[01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  We're going to break and then I'll.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  OK, hang on.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  I call it number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  Dogs have an uncanny way of knowing what's on your minds.
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  Sometimes it seems they anticipate what we want even before we do.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  Look at your Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you how researchers explain this in a moment.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:20.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:30.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:30.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:36.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:40.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:44.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:46.000]  Dogs seem like mind readers sometimes.
[01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:49.000]  It's like they just know when not to bug you.
[01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  Why is that?
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:53.000]  Well, it's not telepathy or your dog's language skills.
[01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:58.000]  Dogs anticipate our behavior by studying our eyes and our facial expressions.
[01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:03.000]  Researchers in Florida trained a group of dogs to seek treats from their human testers.
[01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:06.000]  They had some of the humans read books while others turned around.
[01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  Some just looked straight ahead.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  When they were called, the dogs responded only when they could see the humans' faces.
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  The book readers got the cold shoulder.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:18.000]  Your dog can tell when you're likely not to be paying attention.
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  In fact, Fido is probably reading you like a book.
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:41.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out of town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  Me and I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:04.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:33:04.000 --> 01:33:07.000]  Logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:14.000]  Yeah, and who you want to chip in?
[01:33:14.000 --> 01:33:15.000]  Who you take me for?
[01:33:15.000 --> 01:33:16.000]  Free Tully?
[01:33:16.000 --> 01:33:17.000]  Who you want to chip in?
[01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:18.000]  Me no free Tully.
[01:33:18.000 --> 01:33:19.000]  You can't chip in.
[01:33:19.000 --> 01:33:21.000]  All my friends.
[01:33:21.000 --> 01:33:23.000]  Don't let them chip in when they're morning.
[01:33:23.000 --> 01:33:24.000]  Chip in when they're evening.
[01:33:24.000 --> 01:33:26.000]  Put a chip in on your body.
[01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:28.000]  And then when you go computer reading,
[01:33:28.000 --> 01:33:30.000]  you can't hide me from nobody.
[01:33:30.000 --> 01:33:33.000]  When I say chip in on your mom, chip in on your daddy,
[01:33:33.000 --> 01:33:36.000]  chip in on your grandpa and the granny,
[01:33:36.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  chip in on me, chip in on your baby,
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  chip in on your family, whole family,
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  chip in on your dad when they get around me,
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:45.000]  chip in on the beef when you still go eat it,
[01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:48.000]  chip in on the fish, them all in the sea,
[01:33:48.000 --> 01:33:50.000]  chip in on the shark and the whale around me.
[01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  You must be mankind gone chip crazy.
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  Tip the connecting man they want to be.
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:57.000]  Social security they better be.
[01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  Number when they give me, they repeat what you see.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:01.000]  I'm chippy when they're morning,
[01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:02.000]  chippy when they're evening,
[01:34:02.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  chippy when I give no time.
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:05.000]  Okay.
[01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:06.000]  We are back.
[01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  We're in Kelton.
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  Debra Stevens, Rue of La Radio.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  And we're talking to Don in New Mexico.
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  And Don is going after the IRS for improprieties
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  in the collection process.
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:27.000]  So there's a whole routine for going after U.S. attorneys.
[01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:29.000]  And I intend to go that route.
[01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  I guess if you'll hear me out for just a minute,
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:33.000]  I want to run this by you.
[01:34:33.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  Yes.
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  Kind of how the scenario that I see,
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  this criminal complaint that I've written up,
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:47.000]  just like the last one, I sent to someone there at the FOIA by name.
[01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:49.000]  And in my letter to them, I said, you know,
[01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  enclosed as a criminal complaint, please forward it to the head of your agency.
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:34:59.000]  And I would like a written confirmation from the head of your agency
[01:34:59.000 --> 01:35:02.000]  that my criminal complaint was received from you
[01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  within 10 days of your receipt of this criminal complaint.
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:10.000]  And when I don't get that response,
[01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  then I have something else to go to the grand jury with and say,
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:17.000]  look, I tried to go through channels.
[01:35:17.000 --> 01:35:20.000]  28 U.S. Code 535.
[01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:21.000]  That's right.
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:28.000]  I can add another criminal complaint for the person that I sent it to for that.
[01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  But I can also say to the grand jury that I'm coming to you as a last resort
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  because I can't get through any other way.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:40.000]  That's a better strategy than mine.
[01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:41.000]  Okay.
[01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  I really like that.
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:45.000]  Okay.
[01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  I hadn't seen 535, and I was very pleased with what I saw.
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  As I was reading it, I was thinking, oh, boy, can we jerk these guys around with this one.
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  And this is exactly what I had in mind of how to jerk them around.
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:05.000]  So now...
[01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  That's why I'm sending it off to these other people.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:17.000]  So now you get to file the claim against the head of the agency.
[01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  And he is going to be a real unhappy camper.
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  Oh, that's right, because he's...
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:24.000]  There you go.
[01:36:24.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  So I'm not filing a complaint against this person.
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  I'm doing it at the head of the IRS, the IRS commissioner.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:36.000]  And the time he gets down to the bottom,
[01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:41.000]  if you've ever been in the military, you know how that works.
[01:36:41.000 --> 01:36:42.000]  Yep.
[01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  So I have a question about these criminal complaints.
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  Okay.
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  I write them up.
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  I take the authorization page down to a notary, and the notary authenticates my signature.
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:01.000]  I send this original off, and I keep a copy.
[01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  Should I be keeping the original and sending copies?
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  Make a couple of originals.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  Make more than one?
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  Yeah.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  Take two or three and have the notary sign each one of them.
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:18.000]  Okay.
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  But as long as you have one,
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  the notary will have reflected in her records or his records that he verified this document.
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:34.000]  So the original is not that important.
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:37.000]  They don't write that stuff down here.
[01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:38.000]  Right.
[01:37:38.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  Whoever gets it needs to get an original just so they don't have something to complain about.
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:44.000]  But if you make a couple of originals,
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:48.000]  if they claim they didn't get one and say, well, here you go, here's another original.
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:49.000]  Yeah.
[01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  No, I'll start doing three just for fun.
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:37:56.000]  Next question.
[01:37:56.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  I know we're limited on time here.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:08.000]  The FOIA response that I got, part of her response was clarifying that they gave me the wrong information
[01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:13.000]  about the name of the supervisor, which I've been dealing with.
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  And she corrected in writing that she gave me his real name.
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:25.000]  And I had already sent out a criminal complaint to the FBI using the name they gave me.
[01:38:25.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  And should I go ahead and do a new criminal complaint superseding the original with his?
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:39.000]  Because in that complaint, I said, I don't know what his name is, if it's David or Dean.
[01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  But now I know.
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:52.000]  Yeah, do an amended complaint and state in the complaint that you were given the incorrect name originally.
[01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:59.000]  And you subsequently determine the correct name for the individual.
[01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:00.000]  OK.
[01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:03.000]  That gave you an opportunity to run it through the mill again.
[01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  Yeah.
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  No, I intended.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  I'm going to do it and send it off to him.
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  OK.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:19.000]  It's a whole lot better when you're on the leading edge instead of when you're on offense instead of defense.
[01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  I went down and filed against my district judge today.
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  You talk about everybody walking on eggshells.
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  They were really being careful.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  I like it when they're really careful with me.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:37.000]  Did you give it to the court clerk?
[01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  I went to the bailiff.
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:50.000]  And this was the bailiff that about 15 years ago dragged me down the stairs and knocked me down, broke my elbow.
[01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  To keep me from getting to the grand jury with complaints against the district attorney.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:59.000]  It was a different district attorney then.
[01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:01.000]  And I didn't go after.
[01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  I didn't make any kind of complaint because he really did not be down on purpose.
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:12.000]  He put his hand on my back as I stepped out the door and gave a little push and my foot hit a carpet just as he pushed me.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:16.000]  That caused the carpet to come out from under me and I fell down backwards.
[01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  So I didn't go after him.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  So he kind of feels like he owed me.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  So I came to him and he's sitting in front of the grand jury room and I said instruct the foreman that I have business with the grand jury.
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:34.000]  He said, I can't do that.
[01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  Yes, you can.
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  Dick, you know I do my homework.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:44.000]  If you could not do this, I would not be here.
[01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  I said, well, I can't disturb the grand jury.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  Well, then disturb the prosecutor and have him tell you what you should do.
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:40:59.000]  He said, well, they'll be out in a minute and I'll talk to them.
[01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  So that was good.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:02.000]  I didn't have to go after him.
[01:41:02.000 --> 01:41:06.000]  It just happened a district attorney walked past me while we were sitting there.
[01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  He looked down and he said, I was afraid you were going to show up today.
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  Lucky you.
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  But I do really like this guy.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  If ever there was a prosecutor who had his moral compass centered, this guy does.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  And the criminal complaint?
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:34.000]  He said he would take him and give him to the grand jury.
[01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  There was a number of criminal complaints.
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  The complaint against the district judge.
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:48.000]  And that's because he had a bailiff touch my arm.
[01:41:48.000 --> 01:41:51.000]  Are you familiar with this scenario, what happened?
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  So I went after the district judge just so I could get after the Texas Rangers.
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:06.000]  And I've got a pretty sophisticated petition there.
[01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:17.000]  I have my Tom Delay writ and the letter I sent to Rick Perry's lawyers
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  showing how the procedure was incorrect.
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  And the whole point of this complaint was to force the Department of Public Safety
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:28.000]  to correct the procedures.
[01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  So even so, there's a chance I might get him.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  The one I hope I can get is the director of the Department of Public Safety.
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  If I can get the grand jury to look at that and say yes, the law is what it is
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  and this sure looks like an attempt to thwart the intent of the legislature.
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  Because the legislature intended that the Texas Rangers have the power
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  to investigate complaints against public officials.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:13.000]  And the director tried to take that authority away from them.
[01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:19.000]  Prior to this, the Texas Ranger could not take a complaint against a public official,
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  could not investigate a public official without the express written permission
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:26.000]  of the director himself.
[01:43:26.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  This legislation took that power away from him.
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  So he sent the Rangers to the prosecuting attorney
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  to ask permission from the prosecuting attorney.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  The problem is prosecuting attorneys are forbidden to make that determination,
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:47.000]  so I called it a criminal conspiracy to commit.
[01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  Let's see how he explains that.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:56.000]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, Root of Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:43:56.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  Good morning.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:03.000]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:44:03.000 --> 01:44:06.000]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion,
[01:44:06.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:17.000]  and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years,
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:23.000]  and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:44:23.000 --> 01:44:27.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:44:27.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:33.000]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts
[01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein,
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:48.000]  is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:44:48.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367,
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at HempUSA.org.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:08.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:08.000 --> 01:45:11.000]  the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[01:45:11.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:31.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.000 --> 01:45:35.000]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:44.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:48.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:48.000 --> 01:45:53.000]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.000 --> 01:45:57.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:57.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:28.000]  Hello. Oh, man, in jail. I'm broke, man.
[01:46:28.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  Okay, we are back, ready to talk to Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio,
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  and we're talking to Don in New Mexico.
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  Okay, this is going to be good.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  Ignore anything I said about the U.S. attorney, this is much better.
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  I've got a couple of things to mention about federal stuff.
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:47:06.000]  I found Executive Order 12,674 that was issued by George Bush in 1989.
[01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:12.000]  The title of it is 14 Principles of Ethical Conduct for Federal Employees,
[01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:16.000]  and it's an interesting read.
[01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:22.000]  So for those out there that are interested in federal employees and what they're...
[01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  Oh, I am definitely interested.
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:29.000]  You said somewhere in the Internal Revenue Manual,
[01:47:29.000 --> 01:47:34.000]  it required them to abide by all laws, existing laws?
[01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:35.000]  Yes.
[01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:37.000]  I couldn't find it in the Internal Revenue Manual?
[01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:42.000]  No, wait, actually, I think that's in the code itself.
[01:47:42.000 --> 01:47:49.000]  Right, I think, and the authority for this Executive Order is 5 USC 7301,
[01:47:49.000 --> 01:47:55.000]  7351, 7353, which I haven't gone and looked at yet, but it's in there.
[01:47:55.000 --> 01:48:02.000]  And I haven't checked to make sure that the Executive Order wasn't done away with by Obama.
[01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:12.000]  No, as far as I know, presidents, as a rule, do not do away with Executive Orders.
[01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:14.000]  That's a problem with Executive Orders.
[01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:17.000]  Once they write them, they stay on the books forever.
[01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  What Trump is proposing to do is absolutely unprecedented.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:28.000]  Okay, well, good.
[01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:31.000]  Yeah, and we've been saying for a long time,
[01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:38.000]  we need to get rid of these Executive Orders that were filed mostly in states of emergency,
[01:48:38.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  and the emergency no longer exists.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  So those Executive Orders need to be trashed.
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:52.000]  Well, but Executive Orders, I believe, the whole purpose is to run the federal government, right?
[01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:56.000]  Not to affect everybody in the country, because...
[01:48:56.000 --> 01:49:02.000]  The Executive Order is only supposed to affect government employees,
[01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  but it affects how government employees interact with us.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:10.000]  And therefore, that's right, they affect us.
[01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  And I've heard you have discussions with a few folks about jurisdiction,
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:21.000]  and it's a difficult concept for a lot of people, right?
[01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:28.000]  And I was looking up federal holidays online.
[01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:29.000]  Can you hear me okay?
[01:49:29.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  Yeah, I can hear you.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:32.000]  Okay.
[01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:36.000]  I looked up federal holidays, because when you're doing this kind of stuff,
[01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:42.000]  you don't have to, you know, one of the days that doesn't apply to responses from them is federal holidays.
[01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:47.000]  And I found this website that talks about the limited jurisdiction of Congress,
[01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:50.000]  and the fact that there are no national holidays,
[01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  that the ten federal holidays are designated by the U.S. Congress,
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:04.000]  but they're not national because Congress doesn't have the constitutional authority to create holidays for us.
[01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  All they can do is create holidays for the federal institutions.
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:14.000]  So it's a good way to look at the limited jurisdiction of Congress, I think.
[01:50:14.000 --> 01:50:20.000]  Yes, and that's one of the most important things for us to understand.
[01:50:20.000 --> 01:50:21.000]  Yes.
[01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:25.000]  When I talk about the traffic issue, you know,
[01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:28.000]  Eddie and a lot of other folks are going after all kinds of stuff,
[01:50:28.000 --> 01:50:35.000]  and I look at it and I say, hold on, stop, stop, stop, jurisdiction.
[01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  I look at the traffic, a policeman writes me a traffic ticket.
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  Before I go to the transportation code,
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:57.000]  I want to look at that citation and determine how that citation grants the court subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:50:57.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  That the complaint must be sufficient on its face.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:14.000]  And the first thing it must establish is that I am subject to the statutory scheme.
[01:51:14.000 --> 01:51:23.000]  And the way it does that, it must state facts that give the officer reasonable probable cause
[01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  that I am operating a motorized conveyance in a manner that brings it under the statutory scheme.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:37.000]  Nothing on mind about that.
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:39.000]  No, that's right.
[01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:43.000]  So no subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:44.000]  Yep.
[01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  And subject matter jurisdiction is great because I get people with foreclosure issues,
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  they call me, got someone call me, and they foreclosed on her the next day.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:51:59.000]  She called me the day before they were going to foreclose.
[01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:01.000]  And she already had the eviction hearing.
[01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:04.000]  This is Ohio or Tramito, I think.
[01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  And it's a judicial state.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:10.000]  So they already had the hearing and stuff, and she lost all of that.
[01:52:10.000 --> 01:52:14.000]  And it looks like it's over for her.
[01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:27.000]  Not. We go back, look at the petitioner, and say this entity never had the agency
[01:52:27.000 --> 01:52:32.000]  to represent a principal withstanding and the legal capacity
[01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:37.000]  to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.
[01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:40.000]  Always I want to go to subject matter jurisdiction
[01:52:40.000 --> 01:52:45.000]  because subject matter jurisdiction may be challenged at any time,
[01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  no matter how remote in history.
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:53.000]  So it always gets us back in the court.
[01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  It always gets ignored by the trial court, right?
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:52:58.000]  Yeah, always, always.
[01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:01.000]  But then you sue the trial court judge.
[01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  Yeah, well, yeah, that's right. You have to.
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:09.000]  It's the only time he can be sued is when he lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  And I am so looking forward to doing that.
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:18.000]  They gave me a ticket recently in Decatur, Texas,
[01:53:18.000 --> 01:53:23.000]  and I was so looking forward to suing the judge.
[01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:24.000]  But they threw it out.
[01:53:24.000 --> 01:53:27.000]  I didn't show up for that first hearing.
[01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:32.000]  They told me to be here at this day at this time, and I got my days mixed up.
[01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  I was supposed to be there at 9, and I figured it out and got there at 3 in the evening.
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:42.000]  And that no good prosecutor, when I didn't show up for that hearing,
[01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:45.000]  he dismissed my ticket.
[01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  I called the chief of police.
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  What is going on here?
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  This dirty rotten prosecutor dismissed my ticket.
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:58.000]  Yes, Mr. Kelton, you're not going to get to have your fun with us this time.
[01:53:58.000 --> 01:54:00.000]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:03.000]  We were just about to get to the good part.
[01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:08.000]  The next one I went to was a friend of mine got a ticket.
[01:54:08.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  And for years, I've been referencing the Justice of the Peace, Mark Autry,
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:21.000]  that I told everybody I thought that Mark Autry would do what he believed to be right
[01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:23.000]  if it harrived the pope.
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  And I went in helping this other guy, and Mark Autry was, at this time,
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:30.000]  he was a municipal judge.
[01:54:30.000 --> 01:54:34.000]  And this guy filed a judgmental jurisdiction challenge,
[01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:40.000]  but he was supposed to take the one I had and adjust it for his case, and he didn't.
[01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:42.000]  So it had other people's names in it.
[01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:46.000]  And the prosecuting attorney acted so ignorant.
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:52.000]  He even accused me of the unauthorized practice of law.
[01:54:52.000 --> 01:54:58.000]  And since he pointed a finger at me, I got Jerry to call me as a witness.
[01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:05.000]  And when I got done with him, the next day, Mark Autry resigned.
[01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  I hated for that to happen, but he was so mortified at what this prosecutor did
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:16.000]  and how inappropriate he was that he resigned.
[01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:19.000]  And he told me, so I'm getting too old for this.
[01:55:19.000 --> 01:55:22.000]  Heck, I'm 57.
[01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:24.000]  Huh?
[01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:29.000]  I'm not, and I'm 67.
[01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:33.000]  But everything went to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:37.000]  I could hear Jerry could absolutely sue them.
[01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  In this case, we filed two information requests, and they didn't respond to them.
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  So Jerry goes to the hearing and hands the judge the challenge subject matter
[01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:55.000]  jurisdiction and a criminal complaint against the mayor.
[01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:58.000]  Oh, that was interesting.
[01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:02.000]  It got everybody hopping up and down.
[01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  So then at a hearing, the prosecutor treated the information requests as if they
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:13.000]  were petitions for discovery.
[01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:17.000]  Bad, bad mistake.
[01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  In Texas, for a classy misdemeanor, there is no discovery.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:31.000]  When I spoke to the court, I told Mark that I filed probably 15 or 20 information
[01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  requests with you.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:41.000]  You never mistook them for a motion for discovery.
[01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:49.000]  Anyway, he knew that the lawyer had screwed up real bad and he got caught.
[01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:56.000]  But anyway, I am a creature statute, and I like, you gave me a great statute.
[01:56:56.000 --> 01:57:00.000]  That 28 USC 535 is wonderful.
[01:57:00.000 --> 01:57:04.000]  I am going to have so much fun beating these guys up with it.
[01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:10.000]  Next month, when I go to the grand jury again, I will be filing criminal charges
[01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:15.000]  against my local federal judge.
[01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:18.000]  That's going to be interesting.
[01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:19.000]  I thought you just did.
[01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:21.000]  Was that a different judge?
[01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  Yeah, this is a federal judge.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:29.000]  I filed a declaratory judgment case in the state.
[01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  Wells Fargo removed it to the Fed.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:36.000]  I filed a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction in the Fed because of the
[01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:41.000]  2011 Venue Removal Clarification Act.
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:48.000]  The other side filed a 12B6, which is standard, and the judge dismissed with
[01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:52.000]  prejudice based on their 12B6 and ignored the challenge to subject matter
[01:57:52.000 --> 01:57:54.000]  jurisdiction.
[01:57:54.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  Was that McBride?
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:57:58.000]  That was McBride.
[01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:03.000]  So I am charging him with official oppression, 3903.
[01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  He's in a federal courthouse, but that courthouse does not belong to the
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:08.000]  Feds.
[01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  It belongs to the state.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  They just leased it.
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  So he is in this state and subject to this common law.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  This should be interesting.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:22.000]  John, I'm sorry we didn't get to you.
[01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  If you'll call back tomorrow night to have our four-hour info marathon, I'll
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:29.000]  make sure we get to you early on.
[01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Derby Stevens, Rue LeBlanc Radio.
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:37.000]  So make sure you come back tomorrow night for our four-hour info marathon.
[01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:40.000]  It starts at 8 o'clock, and we'll be taking your calls all night.
[01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Thank you all for listening, and good night.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:55.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the
[01:58:55.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:02.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what
[01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:07.000]  the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning
[01:59:07.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:25.000]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross
[01:59:25.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:37.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll
[01:59:37.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:52.000]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:52.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.