[00:00.000 --> 00:08.400]  The following is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly bulletins
[00:08.400 --> 00:15.760]  for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the
[00:15.760 --> 00:23.440]  tides of the alternative.
[00:23.440 --> 00:29.920]  Markets for Friday the 23rd of September 2016 are currently treading with gold at $1,337.27
[00:29.920 --> 00:37.200]  an ounce, silver $19.67 an ounce, Texas crude $46.32 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:37.200 --> 00:46.360]  sitting at about $602 U.S. currency.
[00:46.360 --> 00:52.400]  Today in history, the year 1980, Bob Marley, the famous scone reggae singer, guitar player,
[00:52.400 --> 01:01.080]  and composer plays what would be his last concert in Pittsburgh, today in history.
[01:01.080 --> 01:05.920]  In recent news, a 19-year-old Richmond woman appears to have been the victim of child sexual
[01:05.920 --> 01:06.920]  exploitation.
[01:06.920 --> 01:10.800]  She told media outlets that she began working in the sex trade at the age of 12 and had
[01:10.800 --> 01:15.040]  sexual relationships with as many as 30 Bay Area law enforcement officers starting when
[01:15.040 --> 01:16.320]  she was 16.
[01:16.320 --> 01:20.280]  Richmond city manager Bill Lindsay released information today concerning the city's effort
[01:20.280 --> 01:22.240]  to discipline nine officers.
[01:22.240 --> 01:26.920]  One faces termination, one could be demoted, two face suspensions, and five others could
[01:26.920 --> 01:29.880]  get letters of reprimand in their personal files.
[01:29.880 --> 01:33.920]  Richmond Mayor Tom Butt said in a written statement, I am both disappointed and outraged
[01:33.920 --> 01:38.000]  that the individual behavior of some Richmond police officers has brought discredit to the
[01:38.000 --> 01:46.800]  department and serves to undermine community trust.
[01:46.800 --> 01:51.040]  Bradley or Chelsea Manning, the soldier imprisoned in Kansas for leaking classified information
[01:51.040 --> 01:55.840]  to WikiLeaks in 2010, known as the collateral murder video, was sentenced late Thursday
[01:55.840 --> 02:00.680]  to 14 days in solitary confinement for a July suicide attempt and for having a prohibited
[02:00.680 --> 02:04.800]  book, Hacker, Hopes, or Whistleblower Spy, by Gabriella Coleman.
[02:04.800 --> 02:09.240]  Manning is serving a 35-year sentence at a military prison in Fort Leavenworth, arrested
[02:09.240 --> 02:14.700]  in 2010 and convicted in 2013 by court martial on violations of the Espionage Act for leaking
[02:14.700 --> 02:19.360]  a classified US military video depicting the indiscriminate slaying of over a dozen people
[02:19.360 --> 02:26.040]  in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad, which included two Reuters news reporters.
[02:26.040 --> 02:32.640]  UPS successfully used a drone to deliver medicine to an island near Boston.
[02:32.640 --> 02:36.840]  Jumping into the drone delivery wars with competitors like Amazon and Alphabet, it was
[02:36.840 --> 02:40.200]  the delivery of an inhaler which was coordinated with the Syfy Works.
[02:40.200 --> 02:44.780]  UPS delivery marks the first major commercial delivery by drone in the US since the Federal
[02:44.780 --> 02:49.240]  Aviation Administration passed regulations in late August authorizing businesses to start
[02:49.240 --> 02:50.240]  using small drones.
[02:50.240 --> 03:19.880]  This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for September 23rd, 2016.
[03:19.880 --> 03:47.880]  How are you?
[03:47.880 --> 04:00.880]  Texas by the tall oak tree. Round up all of them bad boys, hang them high up the street, for all the people to see.
[04:00.880 --> 04:08.880]  There's just this one thing you should always find, you gotta saddle up your boys, you gotta draw a hard line.
[04:08.880 --> 04:21.880]  When the gun smoke settles, we'll sing a victory tune, and we'll haul me back at the local snow. We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing.
[04:21.880 --> 04:26.880]  Let's get for my men, before my horse says.
[04:26.880 --> 04:36.880]  We got too many gangsters too, dirty deans.
[04:36.880 --> 04:41.880]  Alright folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig.
[04:41.880 --> 04:59.880]  It is September 26, 2016. The latest update I have on the film that we have coming out is that it is only days, and I don't have an exact number of those, but only days away from being ready for release.
[04:59.880 --> 05:03.880]  So hopefully we'll have an update on that sometime soon.
[05:03.880 --> 05:15.880]  Also, the telephones are currently off. I've got a couple things I want to go through before I turn them on, and to kind of conserve funds where we have to pay for that time that people are staying up on the board.
[05:15.880 --> 05:21.880]  So please bear with us. I will turn them on when I get prepared to do so.
[05:21.880 --> 05:31.880]  Now, tonight is the night of the so-called presidential debates between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
[05:31.880 --> 05:48.880]  Now, folks, if you can spend five minutes in this debate, and your BS meter is not pegging out, no matter which one of them you're listening to, then I really feel for our country.
[05:48.880 --> 05:57.880]  Neither one of these people is going to do what they are leading you to believe they're going to do on the good side of anything.
[05:57.880 --> 06:07.880]  When this is all said and done, what will come out of this is that they will be serving themselves just as they always have.
[06:07.880 --> 06:19.880]  Now, I would love to be pleasantly surprised by Trump if he gets elected, but my inner gut tells me that will not be the case.
[06:19.880 --> 06:24.880]  My common sense tells me that will not be the case.
[06:24.880 --> 06:32.880]  He did not get rich by being an honest individual and being forthright with the people he was doing business with.
[06:32.880 --> 06:43.880]  And Hillary Clinton did not get rich by doing anything even remotely honest and beneficial to anyone other than Hillary Clinton.
[06:43.880 --> 06:54.880]  So I don't believe either of them have any interest at heart other than their own, just as it has been for decades now.
[06:54.880 --> 07:06.880]  So if you're watching this and you're actually believing this stuff, please lower the level of medication you are on because it is seriously affecting your judgment.
[07:06.880 --> 07:16.880]  That being said, some of the information I want to get into has to do with this case that I'm working on where the state is attempting to use the Transportation Code
[07:16.880 --> 07:30.880]  as a fraudulent means of allowing a DPS trooper to perform a warrantless search and seizure, not just a trooper, but every law enforcement officer we've got.
[07:30.880 --> 07:45.880]  They have used and abused the Transportation Code in more ways than the general public is even aware of to do more unlawful and unconstitutional things than we should have to think of.
[07:45.880 --> 07:49.880]  But it is true nonetheless.
[07:49.880 --> 07:59.880]  Now, some of the things that we're going to get into with the issues of this case, some of the issues I'm bringing up are what does transportation mean in the context of the Texas Transportation Code?
[07:59.880 --> 08:17.880]  The reason this is relevant to a felony evading case is that the specific offense of felony evasion is limited to someone doing so in a vehicle that matches the definition found within the Transportation Code
[08:17.880 --> 08:25.880]  under Chapter 541, 541.201 to be exact, Sub-Item 23, I think it is.
[08:25.880 --> 08:38.880]  Where there, the definition of vehicle is whatever it is, but it is specifically relevant solely to the subject matter of transportation, which is what the Code regulates.
[08:38.880 --> 08:52.880]  Okay? Doesn't regulate everything on the roads, it regulates only those things relevant and subject, part and parcel, to transportation.
[08:52.880 --> 08:55.880]  Now, let's get in a little bit about what I'm putting into this.
[08:55.880 --> 09:14.880]  The bill title of the current recodified Transportation Code as enacted in 1995 by the 74th Legislature in the provisions of SB 971 states that the singular subject matter of that bill is to regulate the privileged occupation of transportation.
[09:14.880 --> 09:34.880]  Within any Texas Code, and while the legislature either chooses or chose or neglected to specifically define the term transportation within any Texas Code, we can still determine what it legally means by using the rules of statutory interpretation within Section 312.002 of the Texas Government Code.
[09:34.880 --> 09:46.880]  By applying the rules of Section 312.002 of the Texas Government Code, we find that transportation means the movement of goods or persons from one place to another by a carrier.
[09:46.880 --> 09:56.880]  And this is the interpretation of the United States Supreme Court and Interstate Commerce Commission versus Brimson at 154 U.S. 447.
[09:56.880 --> 10:08.880]  Now, in other words, it is a privileged and regulable commercial transportation business occupation or transportation-related business activity.
[10:08.880 --> 10:22.880]  It does not mean simply anyone and anything traveling upon the public right of way as a matter of right, whether by use of a car, automobile or other motorized device of any make or description.
[10:22.880 --> 10:50.880]  On another issue, are Texas courts authorized and empowered to expand the legislative meaning and intent of an enactment by judicial interpretation or by legislating from the bench by either ignoring the specific language of the legislation or by creating additions, alterations or removal of the terms and phrases used in the language to construct the legislation?
[10:50.880 --> 11:03.880]  The authority to regulate transportation under the guise of the police power is legislatively limited to the specific subject matter of transportation as codified within the transportation code,
[11:03.880 --> 11:23.880]  which does not extend to and encompass the legal power and authority to regulate we the people, i.e., the general public, under that same subject matter when we are acting solely within our private common law capacity to use the public right of way as a matter of right and not as a government-granted,
[11:23.880 --> 11:38.880]  licensable privilege to engage in transportation. Respondent maintains that he is one of the people and is not subject to the provisions of the transportation code when acting solely within his personal private common law capacity
[11:38.880 --> 11:58.880]  and using the public right of way as a matter of right for his own personal business and pleasure, but only to that law which prohibits him from causing an unjust or negligent injury to another person or their property while engaging in the free exercise of his own rights,
[11:58.880 --> 12:09.880]  which injury the state is not free to simply fabricate out of thin air or presume as being true absent a complaining party with a demonstrable injury.
[12:09.880 --> 12:28.880]  It is insanity to claim that the state as a legal fiction can use its own agents to charge a harm to itself and then use those same agents to act as the primary witness or witnesses to testify to that harm and have another agent prosecuting the matter
[12:28.880 --> 12:47.880]  and yet another that presides over the proceedings to ensure that the state wins its case. As nothing more than a legal fiction, the state is incapable of sustaining and proving any tangible injury to itself,
[12:47.880 --> 13:09.880]  a primary requisite of standing in any legal matter, and yet the state prevails in case after case on such claims despite the fact it produces absolutely no evidence of having suffered any tangible injury and therefore acquired any legal standing to pursue a case at all.
[13:09.880 --> 13:22.880]  Therefore, each title, chapter, and section, i.e. everything within that code and its legal application, must have a direct relationship with the subject matter of transportation,
[13:22.880 --> 13:36.880]  or it violates the requirements and prohibitions respectively of legislating on multiple subjects within a single bill under Article III, Section 35A and B of the Texas Constitution.
[13:36.880 --> 13:47.880]  It is important to note that the bill's title plainly states that the previously existing statutory scheme also related solely to the regulation of transportation,
[13:47.880 --> 14:00.880]  and that this recodification does not create any substantive changes to the original statutes and underlying law, which would constitute a violation of Article III, Section 36 of the Texas Constitution.
[14:00.880 --> 14:20.880]  Issue. By what authority do our Texas courts act to authorize and empower a governmental agency with a regulatory or enforcement power that neither the language or stated subject matter of a legislative enactment specifically provides for
[14:20.880 --> 14:34.880]  or infers, but rather by legal definition, such enactment specifically denies the existence of any such legislatively delegated regulatory authority to that agency?
[14:34.880 --> 14:50.880]  In light of what transportation legally means and is, then it should be readily apparent and understood that under Texas law, reasonable suspicion or probable cause to conduct a transportation stop of any one of a commercial or a motor vehicle,
[14:50.880 --> 15:05.880]  must be within the subject matter context of transportation itself, as the terms operator, driver and any grammatical variations thereof, as well as the terms commercial motor vehicle, motor vehicle or vehicle,
[15:05.880 --> 15:14.880]  are all specifically defined within and are only relevant to the regulation of the privileged business activity of transportation.
[15:14.880 --> 15:25.880]  To read the statutes otherwise is to unlawfully and unconstitutionally expand their application beyond the legal meaning and applicability of the subject matter being legislated,
[15:25.880 --> 15:33.880]  which the courts are forbidden to do under the provisions of Article I, Section 29 and Article II of the Texas Constitution.
[15:33.880 --> 15:51.880]  It should be further understood that Article I, Section 29 is within the People's Bill of Rights of the Texas Constitution, which means that we have a right and therefore legal standing to demand and defend any violation of any and all constitutional provisions and prohibitions,
[15:51.880 --> 16:02.880]  as we are the source of all political power within this state. It is not the legislature nor the courts that set and determine that standard, it is we the people.
[16:02.880 --> 16:11.880]  The courts egregiously err and step outside the bounds of acting judicially and begin legislating and practicing law from the bench,
[16:11.880 --> 16:31.880]  when operating and formulating decisions using the unrebuttable presumption that the transportation code is in any way relevant, applicable or legally capable of regulating the general public's private common law use and travel upon the public right-of-way as a matter of right,
[16:31.880 --> 16:34.880]  of which respondent is one.
[16:34.880 --> 16:39.880]  All right, folks, we'll pick this up when we get back on the other side, so y'all hang in there.
[16:39.880 --> 16:45.880]  Like I say, the phones are currently off, so if you're trying to call in and can't, that is why.
[16:45.880 --> 16:52.880]  There's nothing wrong with us. We are live. I just don't have the phones on yet until I get this presentation of material done.
[16:52.880 --> 16:59.880]  So, folks, y'all hang in there and we'll be right back after this break.
[16:59.880 --> 17:05.880]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:05.880 --> 17:10.880]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:10.880 --> 17:16.880]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:16.880 --> 17:24.880]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:24.880 --> 17:30.880]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:30.880 --> 17:38.880]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:38.880 --> 17:46.880]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:46.880 --> 17:50.880]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:50.880 --> 17:57.880]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:57.880 --> 17:59.880]  Order now.
[17:59.880 --> 18:04.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:04.880 --> 18:08.880]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:08.880 --> 18:14.880]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:14.880 --> 18:20.880]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:20.880 --> 18:24.880]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[18:24.880 --> 18:26.880]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:26.880 --> 18:28.880]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[18:28.880 --> 18:33.880]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.880 --> 18:38.880]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.880 --> 18:40.880]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.880 --> 18:46.880]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[18:46.880 --> 18:49.880]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.880 --> 18:51.880]  That's ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:51.880 --> 19:00.880]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:00.880 --> 19:10.880]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosradioNetwork.com.
[19:10.880 --> 19:32.880]  Look what we got. We are the Christians. I wonder what I didn't have answered.
[19:32.880 --> 19:40.880]  Hi, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:40.880 --> 19:45.880]  Again, the phone lines are currently off while I make a presentation of material.
[19:45.880 --> 19:49.880]  If you're watching the debate, you really won't care about any of that,
[19:49.880 --> 19:53.880]  though you're liable to have fewer brain cells when it's over.
[19:53.880 --> 20:00.880]  Be that as it may, I'm going to continue on with this, and I will turn the phones on after I get this done.
[20:00.880 --> 20:06.880]  All right. The legislature, if any such enactment could be constitutionally viable at all,
[20:06.880 --> 20:11.880]  would be required to enact an entirely different code with its own statutory scheme,
[20:11.880 --> 20:19.880]  the context and subject matter of which would be an entirely different legislative bill with a title specific thereto.
[20:19.880 --> 20:21.880]  And there is none.
[20:21.880 --> 20:27.880]  It is the state that bears the burden of proof to show that there is such a statutory scheme in place
[20:27.880 --> 20:33.880]  that allegedly regulates the general public's private common law use of the public right of way
[20:33.880 --> 20:37.880]  rather than the commercial business activity of transportation,
[20:37.880 --> 20:42.880]  and to then provide respondent with proper, sufficient, and timely notice of its existence
[20:42.880 --> 20:51.880]  and how he allegedly violated some known or required legal duty under some provision thereof, which has not been done.
[20:51.880 --> 20:58.880]  Our courts are not empowered, nay, they are strictly forbidden, from rewriting legislative enactments
[20:58.880 --> 21:03.880]  to encompass subject matter within a code statutory scheme that is completely unrelated
[21:03.880 --> 21:09.880]  to the clearly stated subject matter context of the legislative bill that created that code.
[21:09.880 --> 21:15.880]  Regardless of whether such judicial rewrite is through interpretation or outright judicial fiat,
[21:15.880 --> 21:21.880]  the courts are simply not authorized to create or rewrite law and statute as they see fit
[21:21.880 --> 21:24.880]  or for a particular desired legal outcome.
[21:24.880 --> 21:32.880]  And they violate the Separation of Powers Clause of Article 2 and Article 1, Section 29's prohibition
[21:32.880 --> 21:38.880]  of violating any provision of the Texas Constitution by adding, ignoring,
[21:38.880 --> 21:42.880]  or taking away from the terms and phrases of the statute's language
[21:42.880 --> 21:47.880]  or their legal meaning as used by the legislature to construct it.
[21:47.880 --> 21:52.880]  To do so is to violate the basic rules of statutory construction and interpretation
[21:52.880 --> 21:57.880]  as found within Chapters 311 and 312 of the Texas Government Code.
[21:57.880 --> 22:03.880]  It is inconceivable under the requirements of Article 3, Section 35A of the Texas Constitution,
[22:03.880 --> 22:09.880]  where every legislative bill formulating an enactment is strictly limited to the context of a single subject,
[22:09.880 --> 22:15.880]  that the transportation code could be read and interpreted by our courts to in any way apply
[22:15.880 --> 22:21.880]  to the general public, our private conveyances, or to our use of the public right of way
[22:21.880 --> 22:24.880]  in a lawful, not legal manner.
[22:24.880 --> 22:30.880]  The prosecutors and the courts do this by conspiring and colluding to use completely unsubstantiated
[22:30.880 --> 22:37.880]  and unrebuttable legal presumptions that automatically presume that the whole of the general public
[22:37.880 --> 22:43.880]  are acting within the legally defined capacities of an individual and or person
[22:43.880 --> 22:50.880]  that is engaging in transportation and therefore is a legal person that is subject to that code,
[22:50.880 --> 22:57.880]  despite the fact that the general public were not and are not legally engaged in any form of transportation
[22:57.880 --> 23:06.880]  as a legally defined carrier, operator, or driver of a commercial motor vehicle, motor vehicle, or vehicle.
[23:06.880 --> 23:11.880]  For example, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has ruled that a prosecutor alleging car
[23:11.880 --> 23:17.880]  rather than commercial motor vehicle or motor vehicle or vehicle within a criminal complaint
[23:17.880 --> 23:24.880]  and then using only the term car during the trial process was legally sufficient under the statute
[23:24.880 --> 23:27.880]  to prosecute and convict.
[23:27.880 --> 23:30.880]  This is not simply judicial error or mistake.
[23:30.880 --> 23:37.880]  This is nothing short of a willful and wrongful judicial rewrite and misinterpretation of the actual law
[23:37.880 --> 23:43.880]  through unlawful judicial activism and unlawfully legislating from the bench.
[23:43.880 --> 23:50.880]  The legislature defined the proper legal term or phrase to describe a device used to engage in transportation
[23:50.880 --> 23:58.880]  to be that of commercial motor vehicle, motor vehicle, or vehicle, not car, not automobile, and not bobsled.
[23:58.880 --> 24:02.880]  The legal analysis on this point should be very simple.
[24:02.880 --> 24:08.880]  Can a car be used as a commercial motor vehicle, motor vehicle, or vehicle, or vice versa?
[24:08.880 --> 24:16.880]  The answer is yes, a car can be used as a commercial motor vehicle, motor vehicle, or vehicle.
[24:16.880 --> 24:24.880]  However, legally speaking, a commercial motor vehicle, motor vehicle, or vehicle can never be used as a car,
[24:24.880 --> 24:32.880]  as doing so would immediately deprive it of its legally defined character as a commercial motor vehicle,
[24:32.880 --> 24:37.880]  motor vehicle, or vehicle for the purpose of engaging in transportation.
[24:37.880 --> 24:44.880]  So now the only question is, what evidence exists to actually prove that the car was being used
[24:44.880 --> 24:50.880]  as a commercial motor vehicle, motor vehicle, or vehicle to engage in transportation?
[24:50.880 --> 24:57.880]  And if there is no actual evidence, merely an unrebuttable legal presumption,
[24:57.880 --> 25:04.880]  then it absolutely is not legally sufficient to allege and or prove only that a car was used
[25:04.880 --> 25:08.880]  to commit an offense under the subject matter umbrella of transportation.
[25:08.880 --> 25:16.880]  This is a perfect example of the worst sort of judicial activism, where the court takes it upon itself
[25:16.880 --> 25:24.880]  or upon themselves to literally add to or expand the specific terms or phrases beyond the scope of those listed
[25:24.880 --> 25:29.880]  within the language of legislative enactments, or to interpret them into the statutory language,
[25:29.880 --> 25:37.880]  where no such phrasing or legislative intent exists, and for no other reason than to achieve a preconceived
[25:37.880 --> 25:40.880]  and desired outcome to a case.
[25:40.880 --> 25:48.880]  Which begs the question, when the courts use judicial interpretation and legislating from the bench
[25:48.880 --> 25:55.880]  to go where no law or statute has gone before in direct violation of Article 2's separation of powers clause
[25:55.880 --> 26:01.880]  and the judge's individual oath of office under Article 16, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution,
[26:01.880 --> 26:07.880]  does the ruling and opinion of the court then constitute judicial paper terrorism
[26:07.880 --> 26:13.880]  against the general public and the Republic of Texas as a whole?
[26:13.880 --> 26:20.880]  Now that's a question we need to get answered, folks, because there should be no way the courts can accuse us
[26:20.880 --> 26:27.880]  of defending our rights as something bordering on paper terrorism when their judicial opinions violate
[26:27.880 --> 26:35.880]  every mandate of individual rights, liberties, and freedoms, and constitutional prohibitions,
[26:35.880 --> 26:41.880]  and the language of the statutes they pretend to understand and interpret for the rest of us,
[26:41.880 --> 26:50.880]  and say that they are not themselves guilty of judicial terrorism.
[26:50.880 --> 27:01.880]  It is absolutely the same thing if it could be levied against us at all, but it most certainly can be levied against them.
[27:01.880 --> 27:09.880]  Every opinion they write that alters the terminology used in a statute or the law
[27:09.880 --> 27:18.880]  to gain a particular outcome suitable to the state is nothing short of judicial terrorism.
[27:18.880 --> 27:24.880]  It is a violation of everything that the Constitution stands for, state and federal.
[27:24.880 --> 27:28.880]  It's a violation of the will of the people. It's a violation of their oath of office.
[27:28.880 --> 27:38.880]  It's a violation of the separation of powers. It is a freaking criminal enterprise.
[27:38.880 --> 27:43.880]  And every attorney on this planet, whether they be sitting as a judge, acting as a prosecutor,
[27:43.880 --> 27:52.880]  acting as a defense attorney, or practicing some other area of law, knows this and is in on it
[27:52.880 --> 27:56.880]  and does nothing to change it because they will not bite the hand that feeds them.
[27:56.880 --> 28:02.880]  And the few that do get disbarred.
[28:02.880 --> 28:08.880]  The bar association is nothing more than the judicial equivalent of the code of silence
[28:08.880 --> 28:12.880]  and the thin blue line in the law enforcement arena of the executive department.
[28:12.880 --> 28:16.880]  It's the exact same thing.
[28:16.880 --> 28:26.880]  It is a way to hide the criminality of those acting in a manner that preys upon the people.
[28:26.880 --> 28:33.880]  And we're allowing it to go on and on and on. And I can't help but wonder why.
[28:33.880 --> 28:38.880]  Why are these questions not being asked by every person in this country?
[28:38.880 --> 28:43.880]  Why is no one bothering to sit down as a collective body and say,
[28:43.880 --> 28:49.880]  you know what, our government has gone completely off the freaking deep end.
[28:49.880 --> 28:53.880]  And you know who's to blame? These damned attorneys.
[28:53.880 --> 28:59.880]  Because they're the ones that are facilitating this corruption that affects us all.
[28:59.880 --> 29:04.880]  And there can't be any denying that.
[29:04.880 --> 29:08.880]  They have taken control of the legislature so as to enact the laws.
[29:08.880 --> 29:12.880]  They are the ones responsible for the interpretation of the laws.
[29:12.880 --> 29:18.880]  They are the ones responsible for the way the laws are defended or the way the laws are prosecuted.
[29:18.880 --> 29:24.880]  They are the ones that sit in the executive to ensure that those laws can be used against the general public
[29:24.880 --> 29:33.880]  to maximize the power and control of government over our individual lives and property.
[29:33.880 --> 29:36.880]  We are at war with our own government,
[29:36.880 --> 29:45.880]  and one particular class of people has seized control of it to the detriment of us all.
[29:45.880 --> 29:53.880]  And if we don't wake up soon, we're going to wind up in an even deeper hole and no later long enough to get us out.
[29:53.880 --> 30:01.880]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break. I'll have the phones on. Y'all call in.
[30:01.880 --> 30:03.880]  Are you a sucker for a good deal?
[30:03.880 --> 30:10.880]  New research suggests the way you respond to one of those limited-time offers is all about something your parents gave you at birth.
[30:10.880 --> 30:15.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with a surprising story in just a moment.
[30:15.880 --> 30:20.880]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.880 --> 30:25.880]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:25.880 --> 30:30.880]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.880 --> 30:33.880]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.880 --> 30:40.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:40.880 --> 30:44.880]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.880 --> 30:47.880]  It's a gift most of us inherit at birth, our last names.
[30:47.880 --> 30:54.880]  And according to new research, the first letter of our last names can have a surprising impact on how quickly we respond to sales promotions.
[30:54.880 --> 31:01.880]  Georgetown University marketing professor Kurt Carlson has found that adults who grew up with last names starting with the letters R through Z
[31:01.880 --> 31:07.880]  will jump at opportunities three times faster than their peers whose names begin with A through I.
[31:07.880 --> 31:13.880]  Carlson theorizes this has to do with the tradition of lining up school children alphabetically by last name.
[31:13.880 --> 31:18.880]  Kids who always fell at the end of the line developed a need to act quickly after years of being last.
[31:18.880 --> 31:24.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:48.880 --> 32:01.880]  OxygenAid kills parasites, does the job of 10 products, that saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367 only at NUSA.org.
[32:01.880 --> 32:04.880]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:04.880 --> 32:06.880]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:06.880 --> 32:11.880]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:11.880 --> 32:16.880]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:16.880 --> 32:18.880]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:18.880 --> 32:24.880]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:24.880 --> 32:30.880]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:30.880 --> 32:34.880]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:34.880 --> 32:39.880]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:39.880 --> 32:44.880]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:44.880 --> 32:49.880]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:49.880 --> 32:53.880]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:53.880 --> 33:00.880]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:00.880 --> 33:11.880]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:11.880 --> 33:19.880]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm going to solve them.
[33:19.880 --> 33:24.880]  To the head government them, prosecute them.
[33:24.880 --> 33:28.880]  Okay.
[33:28.880 --> 33:54.880]  Alright, folks, we are back.
[33:54.880 --> 34:00.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio. The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[34:00.880 --> 34:04.880]  We've got a full caller board up here, so let's get started with who we have.
[34:04.880 --> 34:07.880]  And it looks like we've got Olivier in Tennessee up here.
[34:07.880 --> 34:11.880]  Olivier, is that you?
[34:11.880 --> 34:16.880]  Sir Lawrence?
[34:16.880 --> 34:20.880]  Olivier?
[34:20.880 --> 34:24.880]  Either he's muted or he's disconnected. We'll wait and see if he's gone now.
[34:24.880 --> 34:29.880]  My call screener may have picked him up just as I was getting ready for him.
[34:29.880 --> 34:33.880]  So, alright, while we're waiting on him, we will move to the next in line, and then we'll get back.
[34:33.880 --> 34:40.880]  Jason in Texas. Jason, is that you?
[34:40.880 --> 34:44.880]  Hello?
[34:44.880 --> 34:50.880]  Alright, looks like it's going around here. Let me see what we do.
[34:50.880 --> 34:52.880]  Olivier, are you there?
[34:52.880 --> 34:53.880]  Yes, I'm here.
[34:53.880 --> 34:59.880]  Alright, let's see what we can do with this then. I finally got a live voice, so I'm happy. What's up?
[34:59.880 --> 35:14.880]  Alright, we had a little issue. I was delivering two suits to the city attorney Friday and got pulled over by the same cop again. And it's so hilarious.
[35:14.880 --> 35:21.880]  He came out of the car, said my name, said that I was under arrest for driving under a suspended license.
[35:21.880 --> 35:26.880]  I'm sitting here like, man, you just gave me all the goodies. I didn't even have to do anything.
[35:26.880 --> 35:31.880]  He just jumped out on tape and accused me of this, accused me of that, told me I was under arrest.
[35:31.880 --> 35:36.880]  And I needed to help him get out of the car before he broke the window.
[35:36.880 --> 35:41.880]  So, I got out of the car and got arrested. One jail got out.
[35:41.880 --> 35:51.880]  So, my big brother, Giddy, because he thought I was crazy, but after I showed him the law, he looked at me like, man, just go ahead and do it. I'll bond you out.
[35:51.880 --> 36:08.880]  So, he's been bonding me out lately. But I called that night and I talked to Randy and Randy told me to do a HAPIS corpus, file a HAPIS corpus, and he said study it, fill it out, and submit it to the court.
[36:08.880 --> 36:12.880]  He said that the court is supposed to hear it immediately. Is that correct?
[36:12.880 --> 36:17.880]  Yes. And it takes precedent over any other cases pending before them.
[36:17.880 --> 36:24.880]  Oh, oh, thank you, thank you, because when I submitted it, right, she went back there and they said, well, they'll take your name and everything.
[36:24.880 --> 36:28.880]  I said, they'll take my name. I said, you know what? I'm going to write my name and information down here.
[36:28.880 --> 36:35.880]  But you need to go tell them that this needs to be seen right now. This needs to be brought in front of a judge.
[36:35.880 --> 36:45.880]  And after that, you can tell me whatever you want to tell me. After that, if I don't see the judge, let me see whatever you have to tell me in writing.
[36:45.880 --> 36:47.880]  Yeah. Hang on a second, Olivier, let me interrupt here.
[36:47.880 --> 36:55.880]  Now, the thing to do with a HAPIS corpus in the situation that you're in and you know it's going to be consistently this way, write one in advance.
[36:55.880 --> 37:07.880]  Just leave the dates, times, and jail locations blank. Leave it in the hands of someone that you trust to go down and file it with the court and get it heard.
[37:07.880 --> 37:11.880]  That way you're already prepared. You get arrested. You call up whoever you need to.
[37:11.880 --> 37:20.880]  Hey, that HAPIS corpus I gave you, put this information on it, take it down and file it at this court ASAP.
[37:20.880 --> 37:30.880]  And then you don't have to worry about bonds and stuff like that because then you can get, if you get the hearing and get it rule four in your favor that they're holding you illegally,
[37:30.880 --> 37:34.880]  then they have to let you out and nobody's out of bond.
[37:34.880 --> 37:44.880]  Okay. Right. I understand that part, but let's say I filed it and they didn't hear it immediately like they're supposed to. What can I do next?
[37:44.880 --> 37:53.880]  Look at the statutes in your state relating to habeas corpus. Look at the constitutional requirements of habeas corpus.
[37:53.880 --> 37:54.880]  Okay.
[37:54.880 --> 38:02.880]  They will tell you what the court is required to do in relation to a habeas petition.
[38:02.880 --> 38:08.880]  Okay. If something is violated in that, what do I do from that?
[38:08.880 --> 38:17.880]  Then you can judicially conduct complaint against the judge for deprivation of rights and conspiracy to keep you locked away at your liberty.
[38:17.880 --> 38:27.880]  When he does not perform his magisterial duty, which to hear that writ, once it's put in front of him, he becomes a judicial officer for that purpose.
[38:27.880 --> 38:39.880]  But when that writ is given to him, he's still in his ministerial capacity. And when he shirks his legal duty to hear that, he has no immunity for that if he's required by law to do it.
[38:39.880 --> 38:51.880]  Okay. From what I heard, from what they were telling me, it was that the judge was in court at a minute and they related it to his office. And his office said that they'll have to...
[38:51.880 --> 39:07.880]  Here in Texas, it doesn't matter if he's in court or not. If someone walks into the middle of a trial with a habeas corpus petition, he is required to call a recess and hear that petition.
[39:07.880 --> 39:09.880]  Okay. So everything goes...
[39:09.880 --> 39:14.880]  Check the law in your state. I'm telling you what it is here in Texas.
[39:14.880 --> 39:25.880]  All right. I'll check the law in the state. Okay. I'm headed home. When I get home, I'll call back with the paperwork when the judge will dismiss that case. If I get on the air, I'll talk to you again.
[39:25.880 --> 39:36.880]  Okay. All right. Thanks for calling in. All right. Now we're going to go back to Jason in Texas again. Jason, are you there this time?
[39:36.880 --> 39:41.880]  Hello, Jason.
[39:41.880 --> 39:44.880]  Are you looking for Jason or are you looking for JD?
[39:44.880 --> 39:50.880]  Well, it says Jason, so I'm going with that. But if it's JD, that works too.
[39:50.880 --> 40:11.880]  Okay. Well, I was just thinking, I just realized he used my phone to call in one time and that may be why it's showing up is that it's not hitting me. But anyway, this is JD here. As you know, maybe that I just sent you a notification or a message saying that I finished up my judicial conduct complaints and my motion to disqualify the judge.
[40:11.880 --> 40:27.880]  I sent them in and I got the return receipt back that they received them. Well, today I received a letter from both the Judicial Conduct Committee basically saying that they got it and basically outlined what their procedures are from here. You know, nothing really major on that one.
[40:27.880 --> 40:53.880]  But I also received a letter from the court. And it says very simply, it says RE case number 16-1221J4 violation speeding, alleged speed 77, speed limit 65. It says a hearing is set for October 4, 2016 at 9 a.m. on the motions you have presented to the court.
[40:53.880 --> 41:14.880]  One, motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. And two, motion to disqualify the judge. Please plan on hearing this or attending this hearing. And roll short to the point, a little simple little letter. And I guess that after two months of not hearing anything from them, I guess that motion to disqualify the judge kind of stirred some stuff up there.
[41:14.880 --> 41:19.880]  Well, but here's the problem. What judge is going to be hearing the motion to disqualify the judge?
[41:19.880 --> 41:26.880]  Well, that was one of my questions. How is that going to work out for one? And what can I expect at this hearing?
[41:26.880 --> 41:40.880]  Well, that is hard to say since I don't have a crystal ball. I don't know the judge and their habits and the place you're talking about. So that'd be hard to say. They can do a lot of different things.
[41:40.880 --> 42:01.880]  But what they cannot do is sit in judgment of their own disqualification. Now, they can do it if you ask simply that they recuse themselves. They could rule on that themselves. But when you disqualify them, that's a whole other animal. They cannot rule on that themselves.
[42:01.880 --> 42:14.880]  That requires a separate judge to do that. And that judge has to be appointed by the head administrative judge of the district. And you're required to be given notice of a hearing date for that.
[42:14.880 --> 42:30.880]  And normally it is not in the same court where you're disqualifying the judge. I'm not saying it can't be. But now you also have the option of requesting that that hearing for disqualification be done by telephone.
[42:30.880 --> 42:43.880]  It's written right into the statute that you can request that that be done. But it cannot be the same judge that you're disqualifying that is ruling on that motion.
[42:43.880 --> 42:51.880]  And to me it sounds like if they have scheduled a hearing on your other motion, then that's exactly what's happening here.
[42:51.880 --> 42:55.880]  And that's what I thought too. Exactly.
[42:55.880 --> 43:06.880]  So if you get there and the same judge is sitting to hear both object, you are disqualified. You cannot rule on your own disqualification.
[43:06.880 --> 43:16.880]  You can only rule on a request to recuse. I didn't recuse you. I disqualified you for judicial incompetence.
[43:16.880 --> 43:25.880]  Okay.
[43:25.880 --> 43:38.880]  Anything else? Basically, I'm just taking notes here as I'm going. So basically if I get there and it is that same judge, just object, object, object until they either fill the thing out or get another judge in there, correct?
[43:38.880 --> 43:40.880]  Correct.
[43:40.880 --> 43:41.880]  All right, Eddie. I appreciate it.
[43:41.880 --> 43:43.880]  No problem.
[43:43.880 --> 43:44.880]  Thank you.
[43:44.880 --> 43:47.880]  Talk to you later.
[43:47.880 --> 43:59.880]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. The call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back after this break. So y'all hang in there.
[43:59.880 --> 44:14.880]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.880 --> 44:27.880]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.880 --> 44:42.880]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.880 --> 45:00.880]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.880 --> 45:18.880]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas. I'm Brave New Books and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.880 --> 45:38.880]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.880 --> 46:01.880]  512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com. Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products. naturespureorganics.com.
[46:08.880 --> 46:34.880]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[46:34.880 --> 46:41.880]  Right now, we are going to talk to Rob in New Mexico. Rob, what can we do for you?
[46:41.880 --> 46:47.880]  Hey, Eddie. You want me to give you the background on this? I'm going to trial on Wednesday.
[46:47.880 --> 46:49.880]  If you wish.
[46:49.880 --> 47:10.880]  Okay. Back in May, I got a parking citation for having a truck parked in an emergency parking only area. There was one sign up that I did not see until after the officer sighted me because it was buried in a tree.
[47:10.880 --> 47:21.880]  It was big, big gravel turnout. Lots of trucks parked there when I got there. I woke up in the morning with the CHP officer banging on the door. He wrote me up a citation.
[47:21.880 --> 47:32.880]  I filed a special appearance challenge subject matter jurisdiction affidavit of not in commerce because I was not loaded and not dispatched on a load at the time that this happened.
[47:32.880 --> 47:51.880]  And went to what I thought was going to be my initial appearance, which was a quote unquote arraignment. The commissioner ignored everything I filed, denied it all, told me that the allegations were criminal, entered a not guilty plea for me, and said it was criminal.
[47:51.880 --> 47:55.880]  Since when is parking criminal?
[47:55.880 --> 47:58.880]  Well, I said it was a violation of the vehicle code, and that's criminal.
[47:58.880 --> 48:03.880]  This commissioner is obviously an idiot. You said this was California, right?
[48:03.880 --> 48:04.880]  Absolutely.
[48:04.880 --> 48:08.880]  The commissioner is an idiot.
[48:08.880 --> 48:23.880]  You need to file a tort against that commissioner. Remember, this is all administrative in California. See, here's the thing. If this was truly criminal, that could not be an administrative commissioner sitting there.
[48:23.880 --> 48:28.880]  It would have to be a judicial judge.
[48:28.880 --> 48:51.880]  Well, that's the other issue is that in California, they allow a commissioner to sit by stipulation of the parties. When I filed my motion to withdraw a court entered plea, I stated that I did not stipulate to that commissioner and that if any stipulation had been implied or assumed, it was withdrawn.
[48:51.880 --> 49:06.880]  I haven't got anything back from them except the file stamp copies of my post arraignment motions, so I don't know what's going to happen Wednesday. You know, I still got no complaint, got no summons.
[49:06.880 --> 49:12.880]  Well, you won't get a complaint because it's California and it's not criminal.
[49:12.880 --> 49:27.880]  Well, the statute or the code, the vehicle code says that the citation stands as a complaint for a plea of guilty or no lo contendere, but if the accused does not plead to either of those, then a complaint is to be entered.
[49:27.880 --> 49:35.880]  Yeah, but the problem is, is you can't create a criminal complaint for a civil infraction, which is what this is.
[49:35.880 --> 49:46.880]  So I guess my question is, what the heck am I supposed to do Wednesday with this court that has no jurisdiction, there's no complaint, there's nothing. What do I do?
[49:46.880 --> 49:52.880]  Well, that's exactly what you do. You challenge it on those grounds. You have absolutely no authority. I haven't given it to you.
[49:52.880 --> 50:00.880]  This is a civil infraction. You had no power for this officer to seize me at my liberty to write this citation.
[50:00.880 --> 50:08.880]  The citation does not apply in this particular case. It's not criminal. I haven't conceded to give you any authority over this matter as a non-judicial officer.
[50:08.880 --> 50:24.880]  You lack jurisdiction and anything you do to affect me or harm me in any way, including my license or ability to work, will result in a civil tort against you and go home.
[50:24.880 --> 50:34.880]  Okay. Okay. Now, if they try to insist on holding a trial anyway in spite of all of that.
[50:34.880 --> 50:43.880]  You want to know how you have proof positive that it's not criminal? If they're telling you they can convict you without you ever being there.
[50:43.880 --> 50:44.880]  Right.
[50:44.880 --> 50:55.880]  I don't know of any state in this entire nation where you can be convicted of a crime in absentia unless you were there when the trial began.
[50:55.880 --> 51:04.880]  So then do not go to the merits. Do not cross-examine the officer. Do not address the issue of the sign being checked.
[51:04.880 --> 51:08.880]  You can cross-examine the officer. Did you have a valid warrant of arrest? No.
[51:08.880 --> 51:09.880]  Okay.
[51:09.880 --> 51:19.880]  Did you have a valid warrant for search and seizure? No. Then how do you obtain probable cause to accost me on a civil infraction?
[51:19.880 --> 51:22.880]  Mm-hmm.
[51:22.880 --> 51:30.880]  They've lost that argument many, many times. They know they would lose that argument if you stand your ground under it.
[51:30.880 --> 51:32.880]  Okay.
[51:32.880 --> 51:39.880]  But the problem is if you go into that, you're conceding to the authority of this commissioner. You've got to understand that.
[51:39.880 --> 51:40.880]  Right.
[51:40.880 --> 51:52.880]  If you don't want to do that, then don't be cross-examining anybody. Challenge the jurisdiction of this commissioner and any presumptions of jurisdiction and authority granted to this commissioner and say,
[51:52.880 --> 52:02.880]  Adios, Sara and I will see you later. And anything they do after that, sue the living crap out of them.
[52:02.880 --> 52:07.880]  They don't have any immunity protections. They're not acting judicially.
[52:07.880 --> 52:13.880]  Right.
[52:13.880 --> 52:16.880]  Okay. So just stand on the lack of jurisdiction then.
[52:16.880 --> 52:19.880]  Absolutely.
[52:19.880 --> 52:22.880]  I can do that.
[52:22.880 --> 52:24.880]  Okay.
[52:24.880 --> 52:25.880]  Sounds good.
[52:25.880 --> 52:35.880]  All right, man. Let us know how it turns out. But if you stay around for it, I can tell you how that's going to be. It's going to be seen as acquiescence to the authority of that commissioner.
[52:35.880 --> 52:41.880]  You've got to say, I don't give you authority. I never gave you authority.
[52:41.880 --> 52:45.880]  Okay. And make sure that you're recording it when you do.
[52:45.880 --> 52:54.880]  I never gave you any authority to withdraw. I never consented to you acting in a judicial capacity or any other capacity in relation to this matter.
[52:54.880 --> 53:08.880]  You simply took it as if you had it. I objected you ignored me. You're acting unlawfully in violation of my rights. I will hold you accountable if you continue.
[53:08.880 --> 53:13.880]  And then leave.
[53:13.880 --> 53:15.880]  All right.
[53:15.880 --> 53:17.880]  Okay.
[53:17.880 --> 53:20.880]  What do I do if the bailiff tries to stop me?
[53:20.880 --> 53:24.880]  If the bailiff lay hands on you, it's aggravated assault.
[53:24.880 --> 53:28.880]  Sounds good. Got it.
[53:28.880 --> 53:30.880]  Okay.
[53:30.880 --> 53:31.880]  Gotcha.
[53:31.880 --> 53:33.880]  All right, man. Take care.
[53:33.880 --> 53:35.880]  Thank you. Bye-bye.
[53:35.880 --> 53:41.880]  All right. Now we're going to go to a first-time caller, which, no, I'm not making this up, is Eddie in Texas.
[53:41.880 --> 53:44.880]  Eddie in Texas, what can we do for you?
[53:44.880 --> 53:54.880]  Hey, what's up, Eddie? I know it's kind of weird. We've got the same name, same state. But, yeah, I'm a real man. I'm over here in West Texas. I've been a listener for about a year.
[53:54.880 --> 54:00.880]  But I just got my first ticket knowing this kind of knowledge. So I just got two questions for you, sir, if you don't mind.
[54:00.880 --> 54:02.880]  Okay.
[54:02.880 --> 54:15.880]  All right. My first one is, should I bring up the administrative code and use it against them or make them prove I was acting in transportation? Which one should I go at it first?
[54:15.880 --> 54:19.880]  Well, why do you think they're not both related? Who wrote the ticket?
[54:19.880 --> 54:23.880]  DPS, of course.
[54:23.880 --> 54:32.880]  Okay. Then, yeah, you most certainly want to apply the administrative code there, but you've also got to make sure that you make the not in transportation argument.
[54:32.880 --> 54:37.880]  Because without transportation, DPS has no regulatory and enforcement authority.
[54:37.880 --> 54:41.880]  None. The administrative code is very clear on that.
[54:41.880 --> 54:55.880]  The DPS is given specific instructions to create and manage three regulatory programs, licensing, inspection, and financial responsibility.
[54:55.880 --> 55:04.880]  Okay. Those are the three areas and programs over which they're given any regulatory authority.
[55:04.880 --> 55:27.880]  But it tells them in the administrative code that that regulatory authority and the programs relating thereto is directly linked to their mission statement, which is to supervise traffic on rural highways and to supervise and regulate commercial and for hire traffic.
[55:27.880 --> 55:28.880]  Nothing else.
[55:28.880 --> 55:29.880]  Yes, sir.
[55:29.880 --> 55:35.880]  They cannot regulate anything else.
[55:35.880 --> 55:44.880]  Yes, of course. Understood, sir. I was actually going to, that's why I wanted to challenge them, but I just didn't know which one to challenge first, using the administration code or to improve.
[55:44.880 --> 55:53.880]  Well, you do both because one does not work without the other. You have to do both because one does not work without the other.
[55:53.880 --> 56:07.880]  Yes, I get clarity now. And then my other thing that I do have a little trouble understanding, should I challenge this in my arraignment or is it preferred to challenge it before?
[56:07.880 --> 56:15.880]  You need to file a motion demanding an examining trial. They're going to deny it, but you need to file it anyway.
[56:15.880 --> 56:16.880]  Okay.
[56:16.880 --> 56:19.880]  Yeah, they're going to bring up the felony part, right?
[56:19.880 --> 56:27.880]  They can bring up whatever they want. Nothing in the statute forbids a misdemeanor case from having it. They just are interpreting it that way.
[56:27.880 --> 56:40.880]  The problem with their interpretation is that is a direct violation of due process to deny an individual a probable cause determination on a warrantless arrest.
[56:40.880 --> 56:50.880]  It is a denial of due process to deny an individual a probable cause determination relating to any allegations being made against them.
[56:50.880 --> 56:58.880]  And the only place where the rules of procedure in Texas allow that to be done is an examining trial.
[56:58.880 --> 57:16.880]  So when they deny you in an examining trial, they are denying you very specific rights of due process, the right to have probable cause determined as to the validity of the warrantless arrest and the allegations themselves.
[57:16.880 --> 57:21.880]  Yeah, and of course they're going to just straight and ignore me like I said and just take me to a-
[57:21.880 --> 57:35.880]  Absolutely. But now you have documentation of an appealable error of the chain, something that you were denied by not getting that examining trial.
[57:35.880 --> 57:43.880]  You have proof you asked for it. You have proof you had a sound legal basis for demanding it and having a right to it.
[57:43.880 --> 57:51.880]  And they denied you in violation of those rights.
[57:51.880 --> 57:57.880]  If you fail to object, it didn't happen. This is how you object.
[57:57.880 --> 57:59.880]  Of course, always setting the record, correct?
[57:59.880 --> 58:00.880]  Exactly.
[58:00.880 --> 58:02.880]  Setting the record.
[58:02.880 --> 58:04.880]  Understood, sir. I appreciate your time.
[58:04.880 --> 58:13.880]  I do have one quick question. Do you know anybody out here in West Texas or Paso that you know that's credible like yourself?
[58:13.880 --> 58:22.880]  I do not. I don't know anybody in Texas except for maybe a couple of other people and none of them are out there where you're at.
[58:22.880 --> 58:26.880]  Sounds good, sir. I'm a pioneer out here then. Thank you very much. You have a nice night.
[58:26.880 --> 58:28.880]  You too. Thanks for calling in.
[58:28.880 --> 58:37.880]  All right, Larry in Arizona, we'll pick you up on the other side. Folks, call in number 512-646-1984 if you want to call and get in line and let's talk.
[58:37.880 --> 58:49.880]  We'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang in there.
[58:49.880 --> 58:57.880]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.880 --> 59:05.880]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:05.880 --> 59:08.880]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.880 --> 59:17.880]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.880 --> 59:27.880]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.880 --> 59:32.880]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.880 --> 59:47.880]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.880 --> 59:50.880]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.880 --> 59:59.880]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[59:59.880 --> 01:00:09.880]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:09.880 --> 01:00:22.880]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:22.880 --> 01:00:32.880]  Markets for Friday, the 23rd of September, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,337.27 an ounce, silver $19.67 an ounce,
[01:00:32.880 --> 01:00:45.880]  Texas crude $46.32 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $602 U.S. currency.
[01:00:45.880 --> 01:00:55.880]  Today in history, the year 1980, Bob Marley, the famous scone reggae singer, guitar player, and composer plays what would be his last concert in Pittsburgh.
[01:00:55.880 --> 01:01:00.880]  Today in history.
[01:01:00.880 --> 01:01:06.880]  In recent news, a 19-year-old Richmond woman appears to have been the victim of child sexual exploitation.
[01:01:06.880 --> 01:01:11.880]  She told media outlets that she began working in the sex trade at the age of 12 and had sexual relationships
[01:01:11.880 --> 01:01:15.880]  with as many as 30 Bay Area law enforcement officers starting when she was 16.
[01:01:15.880 --> 01:01:21.880]  Richmond city manager Bill Lindsay released information today concerning the city's effort to discipline nine officers.
[01:01:21.880 --> 01:01:28.880]  One faces termination, one could be demoted, two face suspensions, and five others could get letters of reprimand in their personal files.
[01:01:28.880 --> 01:01:31.880]  Richmond Mayor Tom Butt said in a written statement,
[01:01:31.880 --> 01:01:46.880]  I am both disappointed and outraged that the individual behavior of some Richmond police officers has brought discredit to the department and serves to undermine community trust.
[01:01:46.880 --> 01:01:52.880]  Bradley or Chelsea Manning, the soldier in prison in Kansas for leaking classified information to WikiLeaks in 2010,
[01:01:52.880 --> 01:01:58.880]  known as the collateral murder video, was sentenced late Thursday to 14 days in solitary confinement for a July suicide attempt
[01:01:58.880 --> 01:02:03.880]  and for having a prohibited book, hacker, hoax, or whistleblower spy by Gabriella Coleman.
[01:02:03.880 --> 01:02:13.880]  Manning is serving a 35-year sentence at a military prison in Fort Leavenworth, arrested in 2010 and convicted in 2013 by court martial on violations of the Espionage Act
[01:02:13.880 --> 01:02:27.880]  for leaking a classified U.S. military video depicting the indiscriminate slaying of over a dozen people in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad, which included two Reuters news reporters.
[01:02:27.880 --> 01:02:31.880]  UPS successfully used a drone to deliver medicine to an island near Boston.
[01:02:31.880 --> 01:02:39.880]  Jumping into the drone delivery wars with competitors like Amazon and Alphabet, it was the delivery of an inhaler, which was coordinated with Sci-Fi Works.
[01:02:39.880 --> 01:02:52.880]  UPS delivery marks the first major commercial delivery by drone in the U.S. since the Federal Aviation Administration passed regulations in late August authorizing businesses to start using small drones.
[01:02:52.880 --> 01:02:57.880]  This is Rick Brody with your Lowdown for September 23, 2016.
[01:03:22.880 --> 01:03:41.880]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:41.880 --> 01:03:47.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:47.880 --> 01:03:53.880]  All right, we have Larry in Arizona. Larry, what can we do for you?
[01:03:53.880 --> 01:04:03.880]  Good evening, Eddie. Well, let me ask you something. Two callers are back. You are telling the gentleman if the judge acts without authority, sue the crap out of him.
[01:04:03.880 --> 01:04:13.880]  Yeah, except this is not a judge. This is an administrative hearing commissioner. It's basically a court clerk.
[01:04:13.880 --> 01:04:21.880]  In other words, your entire proceeding is being presided over by a clerk of the court and not an officer of any kind.
[01:04:21.880 --> 01:04:33.880]  Okay. Okay. So if you sue somebody like that, are you suing the judge because he acted without jurisdiction? I presume you do that.
[01:04:33.880 --> 01:04:40.880]  You sue them as an individual acting unlawfully in a capacity over which they have no authority if it's been withdrawn.
[01:04:40.880 --> 01:04:52.880]  As he told you, what they told him is that it was implied that he consented when he did not consent, which implies that they require his consent in order to do it.
[01:04:52.880 --> 01:05:06.880]  If he withdraws it, they don't have it. If they act anyway, they are the ones breaking the law because they are acting without his consent to do that which he has denied them the power to do,
[01:05:06.880 --> 01:05:12.880]  which is to prosecute him in an administrative setting.
[01:05:12.880 --> 01:05:20.880]  Okay. Okay. Last week, we had a caller and towards the end of the call, he started asking you about some real estate questions.
[01:05:20.880 --> 01:05:27.880]  And you mentioned that real property is commercial property.
[01:05:27.880 --> 01:05:28.880]  Yeah.
[01:05:28.880 --> 01:05:29.880]  Correct?
[01:05:29.880 --> 01:05:30.880]  Yeah.
[01:05:30.880 --> 01:05:34.880]  How do you prove that? I mean, what's the argument?
[01:05:34.880 --> 01:05:44.880]  Okay. The argument is more or less fairly simple. Can the government tax or license a right?
[01:05:44.880 --> 01:05:45.880]  No.
[01:05:45.880 --> 01:05:49.880]  Okay. And the reason for that should be fairly obvious, correct?
[01:05:49.880 --> 01:05:51.880]  Yes. Yes.
[01:05:51.880 --> 01:06:07.880]  If they can tax or license a right, then all they have to do to destroy the exercise of that right is to set the cost of the license or the fee for its exercise so high no one can pay it, thus the right is destroyed.
[01:06:07.880 --> 01:06:17.880]  The courts have also ruled that the power to tax is the power to destroy. That's in relation to an income tax case, but it's a fact across the board nonetheless.
[01:06:17.880 --> 01:06:26.880]  So if the government can tax it, the government can destroy it. The government has no power to destroy the rights of the people.
[01:06:26.880 --> 01:06:35.880]  The government therefore has no power to do so by taxation or by licensing or the charging of a fee for their exercise.
[01:06:35.880 --> 01:06:47.880]  Now, if they can tax real property, then obviously real property is not something that falls within the realm of common right. It falls within a regulable privilege.
[01:06:47.880 --> 01:06:55.880]  So we're not talking about private property because private property ownership is a right.
[01:06:55.880 --> 01:07:07.880]  The transfer of private property, the use of private property, the ownership, disposal, and disposition of private property is an inherent fundamental right.
[01:07:07.880 --> 01:07:11.880]  Okay. The pursuit of happiness and all that good stuff, right?
[01:07:11.880 --> 01:07:12.880]  Yes.
[01:07:12.880 --> 01:07:19.880]  So as that is an actual right, can the government tax it?
[01:07:19.880 --> 01:07:20.880]  No.
[01:07:20.880 --> 01:07:29.880]  Therefore, you can draw a distinction between what is private and what is real in relation to taxation. Can you not?
[01:07:29.880 --> 01:07:30.880]  Yeah, I would think so.
[01:07:30.880 --> 01:07:48.880]  Therefore, the logic is real property cannot be the legal equivalent of private property and must be commercial as commercial is the only nexus by which the state can tax us under a privilege.
[01:07:48.880 --> 01:07:58.880]  Then how do we get the assessors and treasurers to recognize...
[01:07:58.880 --> 01:08:06.880]  You have to learn the difference. You have to learn the difference. You have to learn the history and you have to sue the crap out of them.
[01:08:06.880 --> 01:08:16.880]  I keep trying to tell folks there is no legal silver bullet here. You will never get a bureaucrat to admit he's doing it wrong. Never.
[01:08:16.880 --> 01:08:26.880]  Not until you're hanging him by his crotch from the yard arm and flaying him alive will he ever admit that he's doing it wrong.
[01:08:26.880 --> 01:08:43.880]  And he has tons of these attorneys in the background using legal obfuscation through legalese and language semantics to make it appear as if this is real and this is not when it's exactly the opposite.
[01:08:43.880 --> 01:08:58.880]  Okay. Now, is there any basis in the argument? I went back and looked up the original Constitution that says taxes cannot be paid with anything but money. And it says that in the current Constitution, too.
[01:08:58.880 --> 01:09:11.880]  It says it in all of them. And it defines money as gold and silver coin in the federal Constitution. No state shall take anything in payment of a debt other than gold and silver coin.
[01:09:11.880 --> 01:09:28.880]  Okay. Is that a valid part of the argument? No. Because no court will expose the fraud that is the Federal Reserve. They're all in their pocket. That is not an argument we will win without the barrel of a gun and the point of a knife.
[01:09:28.880 --> 01:09:34.880]  Okay. Not in their courts anyway.
[01:09:34.880 --> 01:09:46.880]  Okay. So this isn't something to argue with the treasurer and the assessor. This is just something to argue with. Why are you arguing with them? You're kind of missing my point here. Stop arguing.
[01:09:46.880 --> 01:09:58.880]  Learn what the history of private property is. Learn how it differs from all the types of property they're telling you to register yours as.
[01:09:58.880 --> 01:10:14.880]  Okay. One thing you will notice that is missing from the tax rolls is any property designated as private. And they will tell you that there is no such property by which to register said property.
[01:10:14.880 --> 01:10:17.880]  Do you wonder why that is?
[01:10:17.880 --> 01:10:29.880]  It's because private property can't be taxed. Therefore, how can it be registered with them to be taxed?
[01:10:29.880 --> 01:10:35.880]  Why would they have a name for that which they can't touch anyway?
[01:10:35.880 --> 01:10:50.880]  That's true. I understand. Okay. Now on the tax notice that I get, it also says Citus address. And if I look up Citus in blacks, that tells me it's commercial or criminal.
[01:10:50.880 --> 01:10:52.880]  Ding, ding, ding.
[01:10:52.880 --> 01:11:00.880]  Okay. But again, okay. But not argue it. Just go to court.
[01:11:00.880 --> 01:11:08.880]  Argue it in court in your lawsuit. The Citus being stated by the state is that my property is commercial. It is not commercial.
[01:11:08.880 --> 01:11:18.880]  I have filed written documentation and affidavits proving it is not commercial. They refuse to relinquish. They refuse to stop assessing the tax against private property.
[01:11:18.880 --> 01:11:29.880]  I'm here to claim harm. I'm here to sue for fraud. I'm here to get somebody's wasted idiotic ass thrown in jail.
[01:11:29.880 --> 01:11:34.880]  Okay. You have wonderful arguments.
[01:11:34.880 --> 01:11:36.880]  Well, I would hope so by now.
[01:11:36.880 --> 01:11:37.880]  Question.
[01:11:37.880 --> 01:11:46.880]  You know, I think the funniest sight in this world would be to watch a southerner like me argue with a northerner from New York.
[01:11:46.880 --> 01:11:52.880]  Because they say New Yorkers can argue like nobody. I mean, you've seen my cousin Vinny, right?
[01:11:52.880 --> 01:11:53.880]  Yes.
[01:11:53.880 --> 01:12:02.880]  Okay. Imagine somebody like me arguing with somebody like that.
[01:12:02.880 --> 01:12:04.880]  I just wish I had your knowledge.
[01:12:04.880 --> 01:12:14.880]  Well, I didn't get it by accident and I sure as hell didn't get it without a lot of loss, a lot of lost sleep and slurring language from that lack of sleep.
[01:12:14.880 --> 01:12:22.880]  And losing my eyesight, being, going blind on reading books and screens.
[01:12:22.880 --> 01:12:28.880]  Yeah, no, I understand. I've done a lot of reading, but I'm starting to catch on a little bit.
[01:12:28.880 --> 01:12:40.880]  Don't just take it as the reading part. Remember, there's something that most of America has been trained out of doing, critically analyzing and critically thinking.
[01:12:40.880 --> 01:12:46.880]  Don't ever accept something from a government venue at face value.
[01:12:46.880 --> 01:12:54.880]  Anything they're telling you guaranteed has hidden meaning and purpose that you are not being told about.
[01:12:54.880 --> 01:13:10.880]  And when what you're being told conflicts with what you thought you understood rights and everything else to be, there's a hidden lie there somewhere and you better be looking for it.
[01:13:10.880 --> 01:13:22.880]  When someone's telling you that something that rightfully belongs to you is something by which they can charge you a fee for you to own and use, something's wrong.
[01:13:22.880 --> 01:13:31.880]  When someone is telling you that if you won't pay them that fee, they can steal your property, something's wrong.
[01:13:31.880 --> 01:13:40.880]  That's what we call those gangsters. Now we call them government. Pay the protection racket fee or we'll come in and wreck your place.
[01:13:40.880 --> 01:13:47.880]  And if we decide that wrecking is not getting us anywhere, we'll just take it.
[01:13:47.880 --> 01:13:50.880]  That's racketeering.
[01:13:50.880 --> 01:13:53.880]  Yes, it is.
[01:13:53.880 --> 01:14:08.880]  One other question, different subject. Falls here, harvest time is here. I have a couple tractors down and I have an old truck that I have an offset hitch on that I use for hauling my hay equipment and stuff.
[01:14:08.880 --> 01:14:12.880]  I need to put that on the highway for moving my equipment.
[01:14:12.880 --> 01:14:26.880]  But because everybody likes to arrest me these days, is there a way I can go to the DMV, the court or somebody and have this old truck declared a farm tractor?
[01:14:26.880 --> 01:14:31.880]  No, because it doesn't meet the criteria of a farm tractor, does it?
[01:14:31.880 --> 01:14:36.880]  Well, it was not designed from the factory, but it's redesigned.
[01:14:36.880 --> 01:14:39.880]  Yeah, but you're not listening to me. You're not listening to me.
[01:14:39.880 --> 01:14:45.880]  You're talking about converting something that is not under the statute to something that is under the statute.
[01:14:45.880 --> 01:14:49.880]  Why would you want to do that?
[01:14:49.880 --> 01:14:58.880]  Because relatives and employees that are using it, they don't want to take the chance of getting arrested.
[01:14:58.880 --> 01:15:04.880]  Well, I understand that. But my question here is not as simple as whether or not they're using it.
[01:15:04.880 --> 01:15:11.880]  What you're wanting to do is to find a legal way to put it on the road and be protected from those abuses, correct?
[01:15:11.880 --> 01:15:12.880]  Yes, sir.
[01:15:12.880 --> 01:15:24.880]  Have you read the Arizona Administrative Code on what the Enforcement Authority for the Department of Public Safety or State Troopers or whatever the hell they call them out there in Arizona is to use that code?
[01:15:24.880 --> 01:15:26.880]  No, I haven't.
[01:15:26.880 --> 01:15:40.880]  See, here in Texas, the authority of that code under any chapter of that code where the DPS is the agency given the power to enforce it specifically limits them to what their enforcement authority is,
[01:15:40.880 --> 01:15:47.880]  which is under the regulatory sense, commercial and for higher traffic.
[01:15:47.880 --> 01:15:52.880]  What makes you think it's any different in California or in Arizona?
[01:15:52.880 --> 01:15:55.880]  Okay, so that would be in our administrative code.
[01:15:55.880 --> 01:15:57.880]  Yeah.
[01:15:57.880 --> 01:15:58.880]  Oh, okay.
[01:15:58.880 --> 01:16:03.880]  But they don't have all this stuff that proves this point all in one code. That would make it too easy.
[01:16:03.880 --> 01:16:08.880]  They've got it divided up across several codes as to how this all works.
[01:16:08.880 --> 01:16:18.880]  So when you have some attorney moron saying, you can't use that, it's a different code, there's this little thing they tend to forget when it suits them called imperamateria.
[01:16:18.880 --> 01:16:23.880]  Doesn't make a damn if it's in a different code if it's dealing with the same subject matter.
[01:16:23.880 --> 01:16:26.880]  Doesn't make a damn at all.
[01:16:26.880 --> 01:16:32.880]  But they hope you don't realize that.
[01:16:32.880 --> 01:16:35.880]  Okay.
[01:16:35.880 --> 01:16:36.880]  Okay.
[01:16:36.880 --> 01:16:41.880]  Okay, well thank you, Eddie. I hear the music coming on, so I'll let you go and get to another caller.
[01:16:41.880 --> 01:16:43.880]  All right, Larry, thanks for calling in.
[01:16:43.880 --> 01:16:49.880]  All right, folks, we're about to go to break. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:49.880 --> 01:17:00.880]  Give us a call, get in line, and we'll talk to you when we get back. We've only got, oh, 45 minutes to go, so let's talk about something.
[01:17:00.880 --> 01:17:08.880]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:08.880 --> 01:17:13.880]  We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:13.880 --> 01:17:18.880]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:18.880 --> 01:17:23.880]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:23.880 --> 01:17:26.880]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:26.880 --> 01:17:31.880]  In addition, we carry popular Young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burps.
[01:17:31.880 --> 01:17:38.880]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:38.880 --> 01:17:42.880]  We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:42.880 --> 01:17:50.880]  Call us at 512-646-6440. We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:50.880 --> 01:17:53.880]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:53.880 --> 01:17:59.880]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:17:59.880 --> 01:18:05.880]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:05.880 --> 01:18:10.880]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:10.880 --> 01:18:17.880]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.880 --> 01:18:25.880]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jeopardy can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.880 --> 01:18:31.880]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.880 --> 01:18:39.880]  We have come to trust Young Jeopardy so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:39.880 --> 01:18:47.880]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.880 --> 01:18:51.880]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jeopardy, you may want to join us.
[01:18:51.880 --> 01:18:58.880]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:58.880 --> 01:19:00.880]  Order now.
[01:19:00.880 --> 01:19:10.880]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:10.880 --> 01:19:30.880]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:30.880 --> 01:19:39.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call at number 512-646-1984, and Olivier is back on the line.
[01:19:39.880 --> 01:19:41.880]  Alright Olivier, what you got?
[01:19:41.880 --> 01:19:45.880]  Alright, I got the letter where the judge dismissed it.
[01:19:45.880 --> 01:19:47.880]  He said you wanted me to read it for you to see what it said.
[01:19:47.880 --> 01:19:48.880]  Alright.
[01:19:48.880 --> 01:19:58.880]  It says, the court has been presented with a uniformed civil affidavit of the NGC filed by Martin Shea Olivier and Martin Shea Olivier Jr.
[01:19:58.880 --> 01:20:09.880]  and the complaint filed on August 26, 2006 by plaintiffs versus City of Clarksville and others.
[01:20:09.880 --> 01:20:18.880]  The court has reviewed both the affidavit of indigency and complaint and makes the following findings.
[01:20:18.880 --> 01:20:25.880]  The plaintiffs are indigent and are to be allowed to file their complaint upon their oath of indigency.
[01:20:25.880 --> 01:20:34.880]  The plaintiffs seek other damages and relief for claims of false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, malicious harassment,
[01:20:34.880 --> 01:20:42.880]  outrageous conduct, inter-respective condemnation, and civil rights violations under 1983.
[01:20:42.880 --> 01:20:48.880]  The complaint contains 39 pages and is unformed.
[01:20:48.880 --> 01:20:57.880]  In substance, plaintiffs alleged that Martin Shea Olivier was too engaged in the act of transportation.
[01:20:57.880 --> 01:21:03.880]  So basically, I made a typo and he couldn't get it because everywhere else said not engaged.
[01:21:03.880 --> 01:21:11.880]  But then it started going, traveling to Florida when he was pulled over by Officer Keith Jones, the Clarksville Police Department.
[01:21:11.880 --> 01:21:21.880]  Plaintiffs alleged the officer told them that he pulled Mr. Olivier over because he knew that Mr. Olivier's driver's license had been suspended.
[01:21:21.880 --> 01:21:29.880]  Mr. Olivier was arrested for driving on a revoked suspended license, civil possession, and no registration.
[01:21:29.880 --> 01:21:36.880]  Plaintiffs alleged that officers searched the vehicle without permission or warrant or a probable cause to search.
[01:21:36.880 --> 01:21:45.880]  The court has reviewed the complaint and finds that it must dismiss because it failed to contain a short
[01:21:45.880 --> 01:21:58.880]  and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to release as required by TRCP Rule 801.
[01:21:58.880 --> 01:22:11.880]  Okay, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Right there, they have a problem. They cannot dismiss your case based upon the format of your pleadings as a pro se.
[01:22:11.880 --> 01:22:17.880]  The United States Supreme Court's already ruled on that. Okay?
[01:22:17.880 --> 01:22:26.880]  The court is required to attempt to understand the basis of your claim, period.
[01:22:26.880 --> 01:22:34.880]  And if it can be understood, to allow it to proceed provided it makes a valid claim.
[01:22:34.880 --> 01:22:40.880]  Now, there are certain things it can't allow you to do, of course, such as just throw something out there
[01:22:40.880 --> 01:22:46.880]  and see if it sticks with no coherent facts or structure as to how you were harmed.
[01:22:46.880 --> 01:22:52.880]  But anything else, they're required to ignore.
[01:22:52.880 --> 01:22:58.880]  So you should be able to appeal that dismissal based upon that Supreme Court case law.
[01:22:58.880 --> 01:23:05.880]  Because I'm going to file a pleaded amendment, Randy. I file an amended pleading?
[01:23:05.880 --> 01:23:08.880]  Yeah, you can do that too.
[01:23:08.880 --> 01:23:17.880]  Now, when I file the amended pleading, I have to choose the court date or they automatically have to look at it or do I have to request it?
[01:23:17.880 --> 01:23:23.880]  Well, when you file an amended pleading, they'll docket it unless you ask for some specific date for a docket
[01:23:23.880 --> 01:23:26.880]  and give them a reason why you need it then.
[01:23:26.880 --> 01:23:36.880]  So on a dismissed case, when you file the amended pleading, they file it in the docket and then the judge has to look at it?
[01:23:36.880 --> 01:23:43.880]  Well, yeah. If you refile the case, it's a new case. It'll be under a different cause number and everything.
[01:23:43.880 --> 01:23:48.880]  An amended pleading is if the case is still active and you amend it.
[01:23:48.880 --> 01:23:57.880]  As of right now, you're filing a new petition that you've adjusted accordingly, but it's now a new suit.
[01:23:57.880 --> 01:24:00.880]  Isn't that the same case number?
[01:24:00.880 --> 01:24:03.880]  You said he dismissed it, correct?
[01:24:03.880 --> 01:24:04.880]  Right.
[01:24:04.880 --> 01:24:12.880]  Then how would it be under the same case number when you refile? He didn't give you leave to amend prior to dismissal, right?
[01:24:12.880 --> 01:24:13.880]  Okay.
[01:24:13.880 --> 01:24:20.880]  So the original cause number is all there is once it's dismissed.
[01:24:20.880 --> 01:24:31.880]  When you refile, it will get a new cause number.
[01:24:31.880 --> 01:24:35.880]  I'm lost. I hear you, but I got to figure this out.
[01:24:35.880 --> 01:24:44.880]  Okay. It's like if you empty out your bucket, you can't add to something that is no longer in the bucket, can you?
[01:24:44.880 --> 01:24:52.880]  Okay. All right. I understand. But since he dismissed this case under false pretenses, I don't have to go through a appeal process.
[01:24:52.880 --> 01:24:54.880]  I can get him to reopen the case.
[01:24:54.880 --> 01:24:59.880]  No. You're going to have to appeal. You can file a motion to reconsider and reopen the case.
[01:24:59.880 --> 01:25:15.880]  And if he ignores it, then you've got two options, appeal the dismissal or refile a new complaint with the stuff they say is missing.
[01:25:15.880 --> 01:25:18.880]  Okay.
[01:25:18.880 --> 01:25:29.880]  You can file a motion to reconsider, anything like that. But if he doesn't, then your only option to keep that cause number alive is to appeal it.
[01:25:29.880 --> 01:25:39.880]  Otherwise, it's dismissed and you will refile a new complaint with the proper stuff in it that they say is missing, and it will have a new cause number.
[01:25:39.880 --> 01:25:49.880]  I got you. I understand what you're saying. Okay. So just because you dismissed it, I can get the situation back in order, refile it.
[01:25:49.880 --> 01:25:58.880]  And because you dismissed it under false pretenses, the federal says that it's a civil harm and I can sue you for it.
[01:25:58.880 --> 01:26:03.880]  It's not that you can sue them for it. It's that, well, you might can. I don't know.
[01:26:03.880 --> 01:26:17.880]  But it's a simple fact that the court cannot dismiss a process case simply because his pleadings are not in order like an actual attorneys are required to be.
[01:26:17.880 --> 01:26:20.880]  Yeah, I found that. I found that on all the statutes. Right.
[01:26:20.880 --> 01:26:35.880]  And here's the thing. That's only one thing that I read to you. Every cause in here is a violation of my right. And when I was reading the federal point of this 60B rule,
[01:26:35.880 --> 01:26:40.880]  it was saying that when this happens, the plaintiff is allowed to bring suit.
[01:26:40.880 --> 01:26:41.880]  Exactly.
[01:26:41.880 --> 01:26:42.880]  For action.
[01:26:42.880 --> 01:26:50.880]  Okay. So in that case, in that particular instance, you would be able to sue that judge because he's acting in his capacity as a magistrate.
[01:26:50.880 --> 01:26:58.880]  Right. But see, the thing is I filed all that document, all the research paper that I'm telling you about that I learned, I filed that in there.
[01:26:58.880 --> 01:27:03.880]  So when I went to file it, even the clerk was like, she was flipping mad. She was like, what is this?
[01:27:03.880 --> 01:27:12.880]  And then what he has is no excuse for what he did then, huh? Because you can show, look, I put everything in front of you to show you not to be stupid.
[01:27:12.880 --> 01:27:15.880]  And you chose to be stupid anyway.
[01:27:15.880 --> 01:27:22.880]  Okay. So his attitude will change if I push a motion day.
[01:27:22.880 --> 01:27:31.880]  Well, I don't know if his attitude will change one way or the other, but I can tell you what will happen. He will no longer be able to preside over your case.
[01:27:31.880 --> 01:27:36.880]  He can't be being sued by you and be presiding over your case.
[01:27:36.880 --> 01:27:39.880]  Now he's presiding over two other cases.
[01:27:39.880 --> 01:27:47.880]  Same deal. You can get them both reassigned because of prejudicial action by him in the other case.
[01:27:47.880 --> 01:27:54.880]  Wow. There's only two judges in the civil court.
[01:27:54.880 --> 01:27:57.880]  Yeah, well.
[01:27:57.880 --> 01:28:01.880]  This is cool. All right. The second one said that it's unsworn.
[01:28:01.880 --> 01:28:04.880]  Okay. So that falls underneath the procedure.
[01:28:04.880 --> 01:28:09.880]  Yeah. In order to make a claim like that, you need to verify it before a notary.
[01:28:09.880 --> 01:28:13.880]  It's got to have a proper jurat and it's got to be sworn before a notary.
[01:28:13.880 --> 01:28:24.880]  Right. I understand that. I've learned how to do that. But I saw in the federal rules that they cannot dismiss on that either. They have to contact me.
[01:28:24.880 --> 01:28:27.880]  Right, which is just another point to make your suit.
[01:28:27.880 --> 01:28:37.880]  Right. Okay. So number three, it says it fails to state a claim which release can be granted. I got false imprisonment, malicious prosecution.
[01:28:37.880 --> 01:28:40.880]  Yeah, but the thing is now don't just say false imprisonment.
[01:28:40.880 --> 01:28:47.880]  There are specific criteria to making a false imprisonment allegation that must be stated in the complaint.
[01:28:47.880 --> 01:28:51.880]  You can't just say I hereby accuse them of false imprisonment.
[01:28:51.880 --> 01:28:56.880]  You have to do what's required to prove false imprisonment within the pleading.
[01:28:56.880 --> 01:29:03.880]  No, I didn't. Yeah, that's what I mean. I put it in the pleading, like inside the pleading. It's right there. I read it.
[01:29:03.880 --> 01:29:16.880]  Every one of them has the elements. I state the elements, then I went, wrote out the situation, and then I wrote out how they match those elements.
[01:29:16.880 --> 01:29:22.880]  Okay, then you've definitely got cause to go after this so-called judge.
[01:29:22.880 --> 01:29:33.880]  The fourth one that says it claims, its claims are inconsistent. In one statement, the plaintiff alleged that he engaged in the act of transportation.
[01:29:33.880 --> 01:29:44.880]  Right, and that's the typo you need to fix. Remember, they will look for any reason they can to legitimately dismiss a pro se suit against a government official.
[01:29:44.880 --> 01:29:51.880]  That is why you have to proofread, proofread, proofread until you're black and blue in the eyeball.
[01:29:51.880 --> 01:29:53.880]  But the defendant has to do it, not judge.
[01:29:53.880 --> 01:30:00.880]  Correct. Hang on just a second and we'll be right back and let you finish up.
[01:30:00.880 --> 01:30:11.880]  Are you a sitting duck for a heart attack? Researchers say this seemingly harmless behavior has grave consequences, even for young adults, and it could increase your risk for cardiovascular disease.
[01:30:11.880 --> 01:30:15.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you what the culprit is in just a moment.
[01:30:42.880 --> 01:30:51.880]  Watching TV and doing homework seem like harmless activities, but they have one deadly behavior in common, sitting.
[01:30:51.880 --> 01:30:57.880]  Researchers evaluated the daily sitting habits of 17,000 people aged 18 through 90 for 12 years.
[01:30:57.880 --> 01:31:03.880]  They found that the longer participants sat, the greater their risk of cardiovascular disease and death.
[01:31:03.880 --> 01:31:09.880]  In fact, prolonged sitters of all ages were over 50% more likely to experience a heart attack.
[01:31:09.880 --> 01:31:14.880]  This risk was independent of their smoking status, alcohol consumption, and even physical exercise.
[01:31:14.880 --> 01:31:19.880]  But there's good news for students, book lovers, and others who sit for work or pleasure.
[01:31:19.880 --> 01:31:24.880]  Getting up and moving around periodically seems to offset this sedentary syndrome.
[01:31:24.880 --> 01:31:29.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:29.880 --> 01:31:35.880]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:35.880 --> 01:31:42.880]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.880 --> 01:31:45.880]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:45.880 --> 01:31:47.880]  Thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[01:31:47.880 --> 01:31:49.880]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:49.880 --> 01:31:50.880]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.880 --> 01:31:51.880]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:51.880 --> 01:31:52.880]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:52.880 --> 01:31:54.880]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:54.880 --> 01:31:56.880]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:56.880 --> 01:32:06.880]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:26.880 --> 01:32:31.880]  We trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:31.880 --> 01:32:37.880]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:37.880 --> 01:32:44.880]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:44.880 --> 01:32:49.880]  So if those out of town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:49.880 --> 01:32:58.880]  And that's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.880 --> 01:33:03.880]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:03.880 --> 01:33:12.880]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:12.880 --> 01:33:32.880]  All right, folks, we are back and we are talking to Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:33:32.880 --> 01:33:36.880]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:33:36.880 --> 01:33:39.880]  We got a half an hour left, so I'm going to need some more people.
[01:33:39.880 --> 01:34:07.880]  All right, Olivier, continue.
[01:34:07.880 --> 01:34:13.880]  Well, Technic, the problem of what he didn't address there is the fact that you may not have addressed something
[01:34:13.880 --> 01:34:20.880]  and that the initial contact and arrest by the officer was without probable cause.
[01:34:20.880 --> 01:34:27.880]  Therefore, any subsequent arrest without a warrant was inherently unlawful.
[01:34:27.880 --> 01:34:29.880]  It's in the pleadings.
[01:34:29.880 --> 01:34:31.880]  That's in the pleadings?
[01:34:31.880 --> 01:34:32.880]  Yes.
[01:34:32.880 --> 01:34:41.880]  Okay, then figure out why he's so confused besides the fact that he's an attorney looking for a reason not to give you a case.
[01:34:41.880 --> 01:34:42.880]  That's right.
[01:34:42.880 --> 01:34:47.880]  I mean, the only thing I can say is that he didn't dismiss my first two.
[01:34:47.880 --> 01:34:56.880]  I don't know if it was my first two were so well put together and the last one I just kind of threw it all together because I just got out of jail.
[01:34:56.880 --> 01:34:59.880]  No one had like four hours to get on the road.
[01:34:59.880 --> 01:35:07.880]  Well, that could be a problem. Try to go back and pattern that last one after the other two to make sure that you'll run into that problem and refile.
[01:35:07.880 --> 01:35:11.880]  So maybe this was his way of communicating with me?
[01:35:11.880 --> 01:35:16.880]  He may be doing you a favor saying, hey, dude, if I let this go, there's no way you're going to win it.
[01:35:16.880 --> 01:35:20.880]  They'll get it kicked out on a 12B6 real quick.
[01:35:20.880 --> 01:35:22.880]  Okay.
[01:35:22.880 --> 01:35:26.880]  And he may be trying to help you, but again, he may not.
[01:35:26.880 --> 01:35:34.880]  Okay. So I'm going to stay off the gas, but I'm going to file a motion to see how he talks to me after I fix it.
[01:35:34.880 --> 01:35:35.880]  All right.
[01:35:35.880 --> 01:35:36.880]  Okay.
[01:35:36.880 --> 01:35:49.880]  Plaintiff made claims he could not possibly be sustained based on the allegation of fact made in the complaint, a claim for inverse condemnation.
[01:35:49.880 --> 01:35:56.880]  Well, if you remove me from my car, then tow my car away from me, you never had the authority to stop me in the first place.
[01:35:56.880 --> 01:36:00.880]  And driving on the suspended license is a misdemeanor.
[01:36:00.880 --> 01:36:02.880]  It's a class B misdemeanor.
[01:36:02.880 --> 01:36:05.880]  The second offense or any other offense is a class A misdemeanor.
[01:36:05.880 --> 01:36:08.880]  You cannot arrest me for anything.
[01:36:08.880 --> 01:36:12.880]  Even if I was under it, it's a ticket only.
[01:36:12.880 --> 01:36:20.880]  After I get convicted, may I serve time or receive a fine?
[01:36:20.880 --> 01:36:22.880]  So I haven't even been convicted yet.
[01:36:22.880 --> 01:36:27.880]  I've done time and I paid a fine six times.
[01:36:27.880 --> 01:36:28.880]  Yeah.
[01:36:28.880 --> 01:36:31.880]  All of which you need to make a claim of, false imprisonment and so on and so forth.
[01:36:31.880 --> 01:36:41.880]  If they never took you before on neutral and detached magistrate for probable cause determination, which they're required to do in almost every state, then that's false imprisonment.
[01:36:41.880 --> 01:36:42.880]  They did that.
[01:36:42.880 --> 01:36:44.880]  But the false imprisonment here is different.
[01:36:44.880 --> 01:36:52.880]  False imprisonment is when someone is relinquished of their rights without authority.
[01:36:52.880 --> 01:36:53.880]  It's different.
[01:36:53.880 --> 01:36:58.880]  Ours is very, they've made it very broad so they could put anything in there.
[01:36:58.880 --> 01:37:06.880]  If you are stopped from your liberty without proper authority, Tennessee statute says that's false imprisonment.
[01:37:06.880 --> 01:37:06.880]  Yeah.
[01:37:06.880 --> 01:37:07.880]  Well, I agree.
[01:37:07.880 --> 01:37:13.880]  Any seizure at your liberty without authority in virtually any state is false imprisonment.
[01:37:13.880 --> 01:37:22.880]  Some states have not made the distinction or the inclusion of false arrest actually being a form of false imprisonment.
[01:37:22.880 --> 01:37:24.880]  But that's what it is.
[01:37:24.880 --> 01:37:28.880]  In this state, it includes false arrest in the statute.
[01:37:28.880 --> 01:37:29.880]  Right.
[01:37:29.880 --> 01:37:31.880]  And so it does in Texas as well.
[01:37:31.880 --> 01:37:35.880]  But some states, or at least unless they've changed it recently, there are some states that did not.
[01:37:35.880 --> 01:37:40.880]  They considered false arrest something separate from false imprisonment.
[01:37:40.880 --> 01:37:51.880]  Now, also in Texas, we have an unlawful restraint statute, which is not the same as false imprisonment,
[01:37:51.880 --> 01:38:00.880]  though unlawful restraint can be converted into false imprisonment.
[01:38:00.880 --> 01:38:01.880]  Okay.
[01:38:01.880 --> 01:38:07.880]  So when an officer seizes you without authority, okay, that's unlawful restraint.
[01:38:07.880 --> 01:38:13.880]  When he refuses to allow you to go, that becomes false imprisonment.
[01:38:13.880 --> 01:38:14.880]  Oh, good.
[01:38:14.880 --> 01:38:15.880]  Thank you.
[01:38:15.880 --> 01:38:16.880]  I got it.
[01:38:16.880 --> 01:38:17.880]  I got it.
[01:38:17.880 --> 01:38:18.880]  Makes sense.
[01:38:18.880 --> 01:38:21.880]  Well, how about my claim for inverse condemnation?
[01:38:21.880 --> 01:38:22.880]  It makes sense to me.
[01:38:22.880 --> 01:38:23.880]  Does it make sense to you?
[01:38:23.880 --> 01:38:29.880]  Well, without knowing exactly what the elements of it are, I'm going to find that a bit difficult to answer here.
[01:38:29.880 --> 01:38:36.880]  Okay. Inverse condemnation is when your rights to your property are deprived.
[01:38:36.880 --> 01:38:38.880]  Well, no, I understand what it is.
[01:38:38.880 --> 01:38:42.880]  What I don't understand is what's required to prove the elements in your state.
[01:38:42.880 --> 01:38:48.880]  I don't know how your state defines the specific elements of the offense or the tort.
[01:38:48.880 --> 01:38:49.880]  Okay.
[01:38:49.880 --> 01:38:53.880]  So as long as I meet the elements, then I have to be sure that...
[01:38:53.880 --> 01:39:00.880]  Yeah, as long as you meet what they say is what must be proven to show inverse condemnation,
[01:39:00.880 --> 01:39:02.880]  then that's all you got to do.
[01:39:02.880 --> 01:39:08.880]  You got to allege the facts and evidence that would put it into that realm and prove them up.
[01:39:08.880 --> 01:39:10.880]  That's why I can't.
[01:39:10.880 --> 01:39:14.880]  I don't understand why he's a judge because my pleading is complete.
[01:39:14.880 --> 01:39:18.880]  Just that one letter in...
[01:39:18.880 --> 01:39:21.880]  Well, but like I said, there's two possibilities.
[01:39:21.880 --> 01:39:24.880]  He's either trying to find a way to keep you from getting momentum,
[01:39:24.880 --> 01:39:27.880]  since you've already got two that passed muster,
[01:39:27.880 --> 01:39:32.880]  or he is trying to help you not lose the case out the gate
[01:39:32.880 --> 01:39:36.880]  when they try to remove it to federal court and get a 12b6 dismissal.
[01:39:36.880 --> 01:39:40.880]  Okay. Got it. Okay. Hold my horses and keep on going.
[01:39:40.880 --> 01:39:45.880]  Yeah. Don't assume him to be evil just yet until he actually proves it.
[01:39:45.880 --> 01:39:48.880]  He's giving you an indication he might be,
[01:39:48.880 --> 01:39:52.880]  but if you correct it and refile it and still get the runaround like this,
[01:39:52.880 --> 01:39:55.880]  then that's a better case right there.
[01:39:55.880 --> 01:39:57.880]  But what he may simply be doing is saying,
[01:39:57.880 --> 01:39:59.880]  hey, look, dude, I've read your other two.
[01:39:59.880 --> 01:40:01.880]  You did a good job. This one you're screwing up on.
[01:40:01.880 --> 01:40:05.880]  You're in too much of a rush. Fix it and fix it now.
[01:40:05.880 --> 01:40:08.880]  All right. Gotcha. Thank you.
[01:40:08.880 --> 01:40:10.880]  All right.
[01:40:10.880 --> 01:40:13.880]  Oh, they didn't answer my first two.
[01:40:13.880 --> 01:40:15.880]  They failed to answer my first two.
[01:40:15.880 --> 01:40:18.880]  Who? The defendants?
[01:40:18.880 --> 01:40:20.880]  Yeah. The defendants in the city.
[01:40:20.880 --> 01:40:24.880]  I got there, but they said the attorney sent me the letter saying that they
[01:40:24.880 --> 01:40:28.880]  received the case and they're going to represent the city.
[01:40:28.880 --> 01:40:32.880]  I never got one from the tone company, but I got two suits from the city.
[01:40:32.880 --> 01:40:33.880]  All right.
[01:40:33.880 --> 01:40:35.880]  And I never got an answer back.
[01:40:35.880 --> 01:40:36.880]  Okay. Now, wait a minute.
[01:40:36.880 --> 01:40:42.880]  Did you at any time get served with a request for an extension of time?
[01:40:42.880 --> 01:40:43.880]  No.
[01:40:43.880 --> 01:40:47.880]  Did you at any time get served with a dismissal?
[01:40:47.880 --> 01:40:48.880]  No.
[01:40:48.880 --> 01:40:49.880]  Okay.
[01:40:49.880 --> 01:40:54.880]  Then why are you not filing a directed verdict request?
[01:40:54.880 --> 01:40:57.880]  A default judgment even?
[01:40:57.880 --> 01:41:00.880]  Yeah. His court date is coming up.
[01:41:00.880 --> 01:41:04.880]  They have certain days that you go to court to do that.
[01:41:04.880 --> 01:41:06.880]  I'm going to be doing that tomorrow.
[01:41:06.880 --> 01:41:07.880]  Okay.
[01:41:07.880 --> 01:41:13.880]  I'm going to court. I got to do like five days to submit them to deliver them that
[01:41:13.880 --> 01:41:16.880]  I'm going to be filing for it or whatever they say.
[01:41:16.880 --> 01:41:21.880]  Well, just expect them to file a request for an extension of time after you file
[01:41:21.880 --> 01:41:23.880]  your default.
[01:41:23.880 --> 01:41:25.880]  They're going to then ask the court, oh, this guy's serious.
[01:41:25.880 --> 01:41:26.880]  He's really going to do this?
[01:41:26.880 --> 01:41:28.880]  Oh, well, give us an extension to answer.
[01:41:28.880 --> 01:41:32.880]  You need to make damn sure you file a written objection to that.
[01:41:32.880 --> 01:41:34.880]  Okay.
[01:41:34.880 --> 01:41:43.880]  Yeah, because they have to send me something, notify me that they're going to be filing
[01:41:43.880 --> 01:41:44.880]  an extension.
[01:41:44.880 --> 01:41:45.880]  Exactly.
[01:41:45.880 --> 01:41:46.880]  Okay.
[01:41:46.880 --> 01:41:50.880]  And the thing is, is you must object to it because they are way outside of the
[01:41:50.880 --> 01:41:53.880]  limitations or the filing deadline they had.
[01:41:53.880 --> 01:41:55.880]  So they're screwed now, Judge.
[01:41:55.880 --> 01:41:58.880]  They waived this thinking they could just ignore me and get away with it.
[01:41:58.880 --> 01:42:01.880]  Well, I'm not letting them.
[01:42:01.880 --> 01:42:02.880]  Okay.
[01:42:02.880 --> 01:42:06.880]  I demand that you don't let them.
[01:42:06.880 --> 01:42:08.880]  Gotcha.
[01:42:08.880 --> 01:42:10.880]  Well, he's talking about all these court rules.
[01:42:10.880 --> 01:42:13.880]  I don't think he's going to let them.
[01:42:13.880 --> 01:42:14.880]  All right.
[01:42:14.880 --> 01:42:16.880]  Because he's slapping me with the court rules.
[01:42:16.880 --> 01:42:19.880]  Exactly, slap him right back with them.
[01:42:19.880 --> 01:42:24.880]  You can literally say, Judge, I don't believe you're capable of being fair and
[01:42:24.880 --> 01:42:25.880]  impartial.
[01:42:25.880 --> 01:42:29.880]  You are giving the municipality a break that you would not have afforded me, I
[01:42:29.880 --> 01:42:30.880]  don't believe.
[01:42:30.880 --> 01:42:34.880]  You're giving them an extension for time to protect their butts when they've
[01:42:34.880 --> 01:42:39.880]  already ignored the filing deadline and defaulted in this matter.
[01:42:39.880 --> 01:42:40.880]  I object.
[01:42:40.880 --> 01:42:45.880]  I demand justice and that they be held to that same criteria that you would have
[01:42:45.880 --> 01:42:49.880]  foisted on me in the name of justice.
[01:42:49.880 --> 01:42:56.880]  Had I ignored this, I'd be paying through the nose.
[01:42:56.880 --> 01:42:58.880]  I got it.
[01:42:58.880 --> 01:43:00.880]  All right, man.
[01:43:00.880 --> 01:43:01.880]  Good luck.
[01:43:01.880 --> 01:43:02.880]  All right.
[01:43:02.880 --> 01:43:04.880]  Go get them.
[01:43:04.880 --> 01:43:07.880]  All right.
[01:43:07.880 --> 01:43:10.880]  Now we're going to go to Truth Raider in Oregon.
[01:43:10.880 --> 01:43:14.880]  All right, Raider, what can we do for you?
[01:43:14.880 --> 01:43:20.880]  Sarge, very simply, did you receive two documents that I sent you 10 days ago?
[01:43:20.880 --> 01:43:23.880]  I believe I answered that in an email.
[01:43:23.880 --> 01:43:28.880]  Yeah, you said recheck because I haven't received any documents.
[01:43:28.880 --> 01:43:33.880]  Yeah, I haven't gotten any emails with any attachments from you.
[01:43:33.880 --> 01:43:36.880]  Okay, it was two documents I scanned to the email.
[01:43:36.880 --> 01:43:39.880]  Okay, it doesn't matter if there's 30.
[01:43:39.880 --> 01:43:41.880]  It doesn't matter if there's 30.
[01:43:41.880 --> 01:43:46.880]  I have not gotten any emails with any attachments from you.
[01:43:46.880 --> 01:43:51.880]  All right, I'll go up to the postal store and have them check the receipt and go
[01:43:51.880 --> 01:43:53.880]  through it again and try to resend it then.
[01:43:53.880 --> 01:43:54.880]  Okay, thank you.
[01:43:54.880 --> 01:43:56.880]  All right, folks, we're going to take a break.
[01:43:56.880 --> 01:44:23.880]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:26.880 --> 01:44:28.880]  All right, folks, we're going to take a break.
[01:44:56.880 --> 01:44:58.880]  We're going to take a break.
[01:45:26.880 --> 01:45:28.880]  We're going to take a break.
[01:45:56.880 --> 01:46:22.880]  Toe Free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.880 --> 01:46:23.880]  Hi, folks, we are back.
[01:46:23.880 --> 01:46:25.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:25.880 --> 01:46:28.880]  We are now into our last segment of the show.
[01:46:28.880 --> 01:46:31.880]  And right now, we have Charles in Washington on the line.
[01:46:31.880 --> 01:46:34.880]  Charles, what can we do for you?
[01:46:34.880 --> 01:46:35.880]  Okay, Eddie, how have you been?
[01:46:35.880 --> 01:46:37.880]  I'm glad I finally got to you.
[01:46:37.880 --> 01:46:40.880]  Before I was talking about those vehicles that I had that was impounded.
[01:46:40.880 --> 01:46:41.880]  I'm sorry, those what?
[01:46:41.880 --> 01:46:43.880]  You had what?
[01:46:43.880 --> 01:46:47.880]  I had some automobiles that were impounded.
[01:46:47.880 --> 01:46:51.880]  And remember, I told you that because the tab was expired over 45 days here in Seattle.
[01:46:51.880 --> 01:46:52.880]  Right.
[01:46:52.880 --> 01:46:59.880]  Well, I went to court all of them, and every time they ruled against me was based primarily on that.
[01:46:59.880 --> 01:47:00.880]  I did find-
[01:47:00.880 --> 01:47:01.880]  Wait a minute.
[01:47:01.880 --> 01:47:04.880]  Based primarily on what?
[01:47:04.880 --> 01:47:06.880]  That's it.
[01:47:06.880 --> 01:47:08.880]  Tabs were expired over 45 days.
[01:47:08.880 --> 01:47:13.880]  They have an ordinance that they put into effect some years ago, two years ago.
[01:47:13.880 --> 01:47:14.880]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:47:14.880 --> 01:47:17.880]  You said an ordinance.
[01:47:17.880 --> 01:47:20.880]  Well, yeah, that's the new ordinance, what they call it.
[01:47:20.880 --> 01:47:21.880]  Wait a minute.
[01:47:21.880 --> 01:47:24.880]  Who prosecuted you on this?
[01:47:24.880 --> 01:47:26.880]  It's the city.
[01:47:26.880 --> 01:47:29.880]  Okay, here's the problem.
[01:47:29.880 --> 01:47:33.880]  You have a constitution in the state of Washington, right?
[01:47:33.880 --> 01:47:34.880]  Yeah.
[01:47:34.880 --> 01:47:40.880]  Who does that constitution authorize to make law?
[01:47:40.880 --> 01:47:42.880]  Who does that constitution authorize?
[01:47:42.880 --> 01:47:46.880]  It's supposed to be the people of the legislature.
[01:47:46.880 --> 01:47:48.880]  It's your constitution, dude.
[01:47:48.880 --> 01:47:49.880]  Why are you asking me?
[01:47:49.880 --> 01:47:56.880]  I'm pretty sure that's the correct answer, but the fact that you don't know that is already the beginning of another problem.
[01:47:56.880 --> 01:47:58.880]  Well, they have two constitutions in the state.
[01:47:58.880 --> 01:48:00.880]  The only state that had two constitutions.
[01:48:00.880 --> 01:48:02.880]  What do you mean they have two?
[01:48:02.880 --> 01:48:06.880]  I was told Washington state has two constitutions.
[01:48:06.880 --> 01:48:08.880]  Who told you that?
[01:48:08.880 --> 01:48:13.880]  This was a chance to go to the lawyers of many years ago that I talked to.
[01:48:13.880 --> 01:48:16.880]  He said this is the only state that he knew that had two constitutions.
[01:48:16.880 --> 01:48:19.880]  I never heard such a thing. He said they do.
[01:48:19.880 --> 01:48:22.880]  Well, Washington does a lot of quicker stuff like that.
[01:48:22.880 --> 01:48:27.880]  So what I need to do is go look up Washington's constitution to see who made that new ordinate.
[01:48:27.880 --> 01:48:30.880]  Wait a minute.
[01:48:30.880 --> 01:48:36.880]  There won't be anything about ordinances in there as far as them being what we're talking about here.
[01:48:36.880 --> 01:48:45.880]  The constitution of the state will authorize the state legislature to make law and only the state legislature to make law.
[01:48:45.880 --> 01:48:54.880]  And that law, they are the only body that can make binding public law, period.
[01:48:54.880 --> 01:49:03.880]  They cannot delegate that authority because it is constitutionally delegated only to them.
[01:49:03.880 --> 01:49:08.880]  So they can't re-delegate it to anyone, including a municipality,
[01:49:08.880 --> 01:49:18.880]  which would mean that any enactment of an ordinance by a municipality is automatically not what?
[01:49:18.880 --> 01:49:21.880]  Binding.
[01:49:21.880 --> 01:49:23.880]  Binding public law.
[01:49:23.880 --> 01:49:25.880]  Binding, yeah.
[01:49:25.880 --> 01:49:31.880]  So how then can that ordinance be applied to you and your private property?
[01:49:31.880 --> 01:49:38.880]  Well, that's what I had to look up because I know all the other stuff that you sent me.
[01:49:38.880 --> 01:49:40.880]  I went to court each time.
[01:49:40.880 --> 01:49:42.880]  One time the judge shut me down.
[01:49:42.880 --> 01:49:43.880]  She didn't want to hear it.
[01:49:43.880 --> 01:49:44.880]  So she told you.
[01:49:44.880 --> 01:49:47.880]  Well, the judge has no authority to say I don't want to hear it.
[01:49:47.880 --> 01:49:50.880]  That's their whole damn job is to hear it.
[01:49:50.880 --> 01:49:53.880]  I know that, but I've had two to do that to me already.
[01:49:53.880 --> 01:49:56.880]  That right there was grounds for disqualification.
[01:49:56.880 --> 01:50:01.880]  Objection, Judge, if you're saying that you refuse to perform your duty as a magistrate
[01:50:01.880 --> 01:50:08.880]  or judicial officer presiding over this in a fair and impartial manner, step the hell down.
[01:50:08.880 --> 01:50:11.880]  Well, I ended up writing to the presiding, the chief justice,
[01:50:11.880 --> 01:50:15.880]  and I ended up filing a judicial misconduct against her for that.
[01:50:15.880 --> 01:50:19.880]  They turned around and took my car and sold it with my equipment, my stuff in it.
[01:50:19.880 --> 01:50:23.880]  So I have four appeals now on every one of those cases I went to.
[01:50:23.880 --> 01:50:30.880]  The other two that I did go to, I was able to cite those case laws, stuff under the Constitution of the U.S.,
[01:50:30.880 --> 01:50:33.880]  and they still ruled against me.
[01:50:33.880 --> 01:50:37.880]  Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:50:37.880 --> 01:50:39.880]  Listen carefully.
[01:50:39.880 --> 01:50:46.880]  Everything I sent you from the Washington statute says very clearly those statutes only apply to commercial activity.
[01:50:46.880 --> 01:50:48.880]  It is unequivocal.
[01:50:48.880 --> 01:50:50.880]  It says it right there in the statute.
[01:50:50.880 --> 01:50:53.880]  Okay, just like it does in Arkansas.
[01:50:53.880 --> 01:51:00.880]  No commercial activity, no authority to exercise the statute, none.
[01:51:00.880 --> 01:51:10.880]  No municipality or county can legislate in an area of public law already occupied by the state.
[01:51:10.880 --> 01:51:17.880]  If the state regulated registration or enacted something dealing with registration
[01:51:17.880 --> 01:51:23.880]  and its regulatory means, then the municipality is not free to do otherwise.
[01:51:23.880 --> 01:51:26.880]  It must do what the state has directed.
[01:51:26.880 --> 01:51:34.880]  Therefore, it cannot apply a state law through an ordinance in a manner that violates state law
[01:51:34.880 --> 01:51:39.880]  or in a manner to which the state law is not applicable.
[01:51:39.880 --> 01:51:40.880]  You get it?
[01:51:40.880 --> 01:51:41.880]  Got you.
[01:51:41.880 --> 01:51:42.880]  I got it.
[01:51:42.880 --> 01:51:43.880]  I didn't get it this time.
[01:51:43.880 --> 01:51:48.880]  That's a lot for me because my little mind don't grasp everything all at once.
[01:51:48.880 --> 01:51:53.880]  And I know I have an archive that I can go and list to all of this over again,
[01:51:53.880 --> 01:51:55.880]  but I've had problems trying to get into that.
[01:51:55.880 --> 01:52:01.880]  So that's one, what you're telling me, because I have court again tomorrow on my last case for the InvenPowder.
[01:52:01.880 --> 01:52:04.880]  Six of my cards, $2,000 I'm out on.
[01:52:04.880 --> 01:52:09.880]  And every time I went to read all the stuff that you have given me and others and posted stuff.
[01:52:09.880 --> 01:52:10.880]  Wait a minute.
[01:52:10.880 --> 01:52:11.880]  Why are you reading what I sent you?
[01:52:11.880 --> 01:52:18.880]  Why are you not putting this into written motions and briefs and filing them in the court?
[01:52:18.880 --> 01:52:20.880]  Why are you not doing that?
[01:52:20.880 --> 01:52:23.880]  Because I do not know how to do that.
[01:52:23.880 --> 01:52:28.880]  Then you better figure it out because you are getting hands down an education
[01:52:28.880 --> 01:52:32.880]  and doing it the way you're doing it as being dead wrong.
[01:52:32.880 --> 01:52:38.880]  You just haven't realized that yet and it's cost you two grand and six cards.
[01:52:38.880 --> 01:52:39.880]  Yes.
[01:52:39.880 --> 01:52:45.880]  Learn from your mistakes, man, or you're going to keep getting screwed.
[01:52:45.880 --> 01:52:48.880]  You have to do this in a way that they cannot come back later
[01:52:48.880 --> 01:52:54.880]  and say they had no call to know because you didn't file anything.
[01:52:54.880 --> 01:52:56.880]  Well, that's what I can see when you go to the toll hearing.
[01:52:56.880 --> 01:52:58.880]  The first two times I didn't have it.
[01:52:58.880 --> 01:53:01.880]  That's why I was trying to find out, is this the course that Randy teaches?
[01:53:01.880 --> 01:53:02.880]  Wait a minute.
[01:53:02.880 --> 01:53:03.880]  What toll hearing?
[01:53:03.880 --> 01:53:06.880]  Why are you going to a toll hearing?
[01:53:06.880 --> 01:53:10.880]  Because when they take your cars, you have within 10 days to get your vehicle,
[01:53:10.880 --> 01:53:15.880]  as for a hearing, to get your car back to prove that they unjustly took it.
[01:53:15.880 --> 01:53:19.880]  So that's what I've been going to them for.
[01:53:19.880 --> 01:53:23.880]  They know proper way to file motions, briefs, or any of that,
[01:53:23.880 --> 01:53:25.880]  but that's what I was asking the last time.
[01:53:25.880 --> 01:53:26.880]  Okay.
[01:53:26.880 --> 01:53:27.880]  But see, here's my point.
[01:53:27.880 --> 01:53:28.880]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:53:28.880 --> 01:53:30.880]  Here's my point.
[01:53:30.880 --> 01:53:36.880]  They unlawfully used a state law to seize private property in violation of said
[01:53:36.880 --> 01:53:42.880]  state law and in violation of the rights of the individual to whom that property
[01:53:42.880 --> 01:53:45.880]  rightfully belonged.
[01:53:45.880 --> 01:53:47.880]  Yes?
[01:53:47.880 --> 01:53:48.880]  Yes.
[01:53:48.880 --> 01:53:52.880]  Then why are you going through their administrative procedures to hold them
[01:53:52.880 --> 01:53:57.880]  accountable when you should be suing the pants off of them instead?
[01:53:57.880 --> 01:54:01.880]  Because I haven't got enough information through you to know how to do that.
[01:54:01.880 --> 01:54:05.880]  Dude, dude, I am not the freaking oracle out of the matrix.
[01:54:05.880 --> 01:54:08.880]  You've got to take some responsibility for yourself.
[01:54:08.880 --> 01:54:10.880]  I've given you the stuff you need.
[01:54:10.880 --> 01:54:11.880]  Wait a minute.
[01:54:11.880 --> 01:54:14.880]  I've given you the stuff you need to read and understand the statutes and how
[01:54:14.880 --> 01:54:16.880]  they apply.
[01:54:16.880 --> 01:54:20.880]  You need to take that information, start reading case law, start reading court
[01:54:20.880 --> 01:54:24.880]  opinions, and start learning how to write the most as necessary to make it work
[01:54:24.880 --> 01:54:26.880]  for you.
[01:54:26.880 --> 01:54:29.880]  Okay, the state's law you're giving me is the stuff that has been given to me
[01:54:29.880 --> 01:54:32.880]  from all different states, not Washington State.
[01:54:32.880 --> 01:54:33.880]  And that's what I've been...
[01:54:33.880 --> 01:54:39.880]  No, I emailed you something specific for Washington State, a crap load of
[01:54:39.880 --> 01:54:44.880]  statutes for Washington State that made it very clear they only apply to
[01:54:44.880 --> 01:54:47.880]  commercial activity in vehicles, period.
[01:54:47.880 --> 01:54:49.880]  And I didn't get that.
[01:54:49.880 --> 01:54:50.880]  That's why I was telling you.
[01:54:50.880 --> 01:54:52.880]  That's why I've been texting you, but you said that.
[01:54:52.880 --> 01:54:56.880]  Charles, I got an email from you saying that you got it and you had been
[01:54:56.880 --> 01:54:58.880]  reading it.
[01:54:58.880 --> 01:55:02.880]  Yeah, there's one that says no license, no registration.
[01:55:02.880 --> 01:55:03.880]  That's one.
[01:55:03.880 --> 01:55:04.880]  And then I...
[01:55:04.880 --> 01:55:12.880]  If you look in there, Charles, what statutes does it reference?
[01:55:12.880 --> 01:55:13.880]  And I got to read...
[01:55:13.880 --> 01:55:14.880]  I read everything.
[01:55:14.880 --> 01:55:22.880]  WRS, Washington Revised Statutes.
[01:55:22.880 --> 01:55:23.880]  WRS.
[01:55:23.880 --> 01:55:24.880]  I have nothing with WRS on that.
[01:55:24.880 --> 01:55:26.880]  Fuck, I'm going to shut down.
[01:55:26.880 --> 01:55:27.880]  I got to go look at it again.
[01:55:27.880 --> 01:55:29.880]  I'll look at it tonight because I'm going to be up all night trying to do it
[01:55:29.880 --> 01:55:30.880]  again.
[01:55:30.880 --> 01:55:32.880]  But obviously I'm doing something wrong, like you said, because when I go
[01:55:32.880 --> 01:55:34.880]  there, I'm reading off...
[01:55:34.880 --> 01:55:35.880]  It's our...
[01:55:35.880 --> 01:55:40.880]  I'm sorry, it's RSW, Revised Statutes of Washington.
[01:55:40.880 --> 01:55:44.880]  RSW, and I haven't seen anything with RSW.
[01:55:44.880 --> 01:55:46.880]  I know RCW.
[01:55:46.880 --> 01:55:49.880]  Okay, Revised Code of Washington, same damn thing.
[01:55:49.880 --> 01:55:50.880]  Yeah.
[01:55:50.880 --> 01:55:51.880]  Okay, yeah.
[01:55:51.880 --> 01:55:55.880]  But I only see one or two things that have that in there, which I remember
[01:55:55.880 --> 01:56:04.880]  point blank, 524-010, which says all the unions fall upon the same ruling,
[01:56:04.880 --> 01:56:06.880]  if I'm saying that right.
[01:56:06.880 --> 01:56:10.880]  And then I show them where they have no right to take my private property, and
[01:56:10.880 --> 01:56:11.880]  I give them all no case law.
[01:56:11.880 --> 01:56:14.880]  That's what I've been reading to them, because other than that, I hadn't
[01:56:14.880 --> 01:56:17.880]  saw any motions or any briefs before court because...
[01:56:17.880 --> 01:56:22.880]  All right, you need to start talking with Olivier in Tennessee.
[01:56:22.880 --> 01:56:23.880]  Okay?
[01:56:23.880 --> 01:56:25.880]  I need to get you two together.
[01:56:25.880 --> 01:56:29.880]  Now, he's not in Washington, but he's learned how to take the information
[01:56:29.880 --> 01:56:34.880]  I've given him and apply it to what's going on in Tennessee using Tennessee
[01:56:34.880 --> 01:56:35.880]  law.
[01:56:35.880 --> 01:56:41.880]  He could probably be a big help to you, because there's no way I can do that
[01:56:41.880 --> 01:56:44.880]  for you on air once a week.
[01:56:44.880 --> 01:56:47.880]  I know that, and that's why I'm going to text you.
[01:56:47.880 --> 01:56:50.880]  I'll text you my number and hope that maybe I won't have time to talk with
[01:56:50.880 --> 01:56:51.880]  you on the phone.
[01:56:51.880 --> 01:56:56.880]  I am so buried in this felony case and the other cases I'm working.
[01:56:56.880 --> 01:57:00.880]  I don't have time to breathe, much less get off on tangents.
[01:57:00.880 --> 01:57:01.880]  Trust me, I know.
[01:57:01.880 --> 01:57:04.880]  So is there any way that you could email me his...
[01:57:04.880 --> 01:57:08.880]  I don't have it, but if he's still listening, if he will email it to me
[01:57:08.880 --> 01:57:14.880]  with permission to send it to you, I will be happy to do that.
[01:57:14.880 --> 01:57:15.880]  Okay.
[01:57:15.880 --> 01:57:16.880]  Okay.
[01:57:16.880 --> 01:57:17.880]  That's the best I can do.
[01:57:17.880 --> 01:57:22.880]  I cannot promise you one way or the other that he will accept your situation
[01:57:22.880 --> 01:57:23.880]  and offer to help.
[01:57:23.880 --> 01:57:27.880]  I'm just saying that if anyone would be able to have time to talk to you and
[01:57:27.880 --> 01:57:32.880]  help you understand this, I think Olivier could do it, because he's not
[01:57:32.880 --> 01:57:36.880]  sitting up there just wishing into one hand and spitting in the other.
[01:57:36.880 --> 01:57:37.880]  He's doing.
[01:57:37.880 --> 01:57:38.880]  Hey, I am not.
[01:57:38.880 --> 01:57:40.880]  I'm trying to get this stuff.
[01:57:40.880 --> 01:57:43.880]  That's why I asked you before, did you have a course or course on this?
[01:57:43.880 --> 01:57:45.880]  You mentioned a seminar that you gave, and then there's...
[01:57:45.880 --> 01:57:49.880]  No, I mentioned a seminar that we sell to fund the show, which contains a lot
[01:57:49.880 --> 01:57:53.880]  of information relating to transportation, but it is Texas specific.
[01:57:53.880 --> 01:57:58.880]  It will teach you a lot about how to write legal pleadings and how to make
[01:57:58.880 --> 01:58:03.880]  arguments, but it still requires you to adapt it to your state and your state
[01:58:03.880 --> 01:58:04.880]  law.
[01:58:04.880 --> 01:58:07.880]  And if you don't know how to do that, then you're no better off.
[01:58:07.880 --> 01:58:10.880]  It's still $250 out.
[01:58:10.880 --> 01:58:12.880]  Yeah, that's what I figured too.
[01:58:12.880 --> 01:58:15.880]  That's why I've been trying to get touch with you, but I know you are busy.
[01:58:15.880 --> 01:58:18.880]  So Olivier is the only person who could probably help me out.
[01:58:18.880 --> 01:58:21.880]  Offline, I would say he's the only one that might have time to do so, but I
[01:58:21.880 --> 01:58:23.880]  can't speak for him.
[01:58:23.880 --> 01:58:26.880]  All I can do is let him talk to you himself and tell you what he can or
[01:58:26.880 --> 01:58:27.880]  won't do.
[01:58:27.880 --> 01:58:28.880]  Okay?
[01:58:28.880 --> 01:58:31.880]  Is it possible for me to do my number, and maybe if he would do that, he
[01:58:31.880 --> 01:58:32.880]  could call me?
[01:58:32.880 --> 01:58:35.880]  Well, you can email it to me, and like I say, I can send it to him if I've
[01:58:35.880 --> 01:58:37.880]  got anything from him to send it to.
[01:58:37.880 --> 01:58:38.880]  All right?
[01:58:38.880 --> 01:58:40.880]  Anyway, Charles, I got to go.
[01:58:40.880 --> 01:58:43.880]  All right, folks, this has been the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show.
[01:58:43.880 --> 01:58:45.880]  Thank you all for listening and for calling in.
[01:58:45.880 --> 01:58:46.880]  Y'all have a great week.
[01:58:46.880 --> 01:58:49.880]  Good night and God bless.
[01:58:49.880 --> 01:58:55.880]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called
[01:58:55.880 --> 01:58:57.880]  the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.880 --> 01:59:01.880]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what
[01:59:01.880 --> 01:59:06.880]  the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the
[01:59:06.880 --> 01:59:07.880]  meaning of life.
[01:59:07.880 --> 01:59:10.880]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:10.880 --> 01:59:19.880]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:19.880 --> 01:59:24.880]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross
[01:59:24.880 --> 01:59:29.880]  references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.880 --> 01:59:31.880]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:31.880 --> 01:59:35.880]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll
[01:59:35.880 --> 01:59:40.880]  free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.880 --> 01:59:48.880]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:48.880 --> 01:59:55.880]  Looking for some truth? You found it. Logosradionetwork.com.