[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000] The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily [00:07.000 --> 00:09.000] bulletins for the commodities market. [00:09.000 --> 00:22.000] Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [00:22.000 --> 00:26.000] Markets for Friday, the 16th of September, 2016, are currently trending with gold at [00:26.000 --> 00:35.000] $1,309.71 an ounce, silver $18.76 an ounce, Texas crude $43.91 a barrel, and Bitcoin [00:35.000 --> 00:45.000] is currently sitting at about $607 U.S. currency. [00:45.000 --> 00:49.000] Today in history, the year 1920, the Wall Street bombing occurred. [00:49.000 --> 00:53.000] At 1201 noon, in front of the J.P. Morgan building in the Financial District of Manhattan, [00:53.000 --> 00:58.000] a bomb and a horse wagon exploded, killing 30 people immediately, while another 8 people [00:58.000 --> 01:03.000] died afterwards due to injuries, and at least 143 people were seriously injured. [01:03.000 --> 01:07.000] The bombing was never officially solved, but many investigators and historians believe [01:07.000 --> 01:11.000] that the Wall Street bombing was carried out by the Galenists, or Italian syndicalist [01:11.000 --> 01:15.000] anarchist groups responsible for a series of bombings the previous year, thought to [01:15.000 --> 01:20.000] have been stirred up about due to post-war social unrest, labor struggles, and anti-capitalist [01:20.000 --> 01:22.000] agitation in the United States. [01:22.000 --> 01:30.000] In recent news, Obama hosted a meeting at the Oval Office with former Mayor of New York [01:30.000 --> 01:34.000] Michael Bloomberg, former Treasury Secretary under George W. Bush, Hank Paulson, Atlanta [01:34.000 --> 01:39.000] Mayor Kasem Reid, Ohio Governor John Kasich, former contender for the Republican presidential [01:39.000 --> 01:41.000] bid, and many other individuals. [01:41.000 --> 01:45.000] The topic of discussion, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the 12-nation Pacific Rim free [01:45.000 --> 01:48.000] trade deal, and how to make it legislation. [01:48.000 --> 01:51.000] It seemed that the President, being on the last stretch of his presidency, and with both [01:51.000 --> 01:55.000] Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton at least rhetorically opposed to the 12-nation treaty, [01:55.000 --> 02:00.000] establishment insiders, like politician John Kasich, is working overtime with the President [02:00.000 --> 02:02.000] for free trade, so called. [02:02.000 --> 02:06.000] He told the media during the White House press briefing, this one, TPP, is much different [02:06.000 --> 02:07.000] than even NAFTA. [02:07.000 --> 02:08.000] This is China. [02:08.000 --> 02:09.000] This is Russia. [02:09.000 --> 02:11.000] These are fledgling countries in Asia. [02:11.000 --> 02:13.000] And we want to pivot to Asia? [02:13.000 --> 02:14.000] We have to do this. [02:14.000 --> 02:17.000] This is an opportunity for Congress to carry out its responsibility. [02:17.000 --> 02:19.000] You got to get this done. [02:19.000 --> 02:21.000] I'd love to think it could happen next year. [02:21.000 --> 02:24.000] I'm not convinced it can happen after this year. [02:24.000 --> 02:28.000] So, in other words, get ready for a sneaky legislative session this fall, since Kasich [02:28.000 --> 02:34.000] also defended the prospect of Obama pushing TPP towards the lame-duck season of Congress, [02:34.000 --> 02:38.000] which, no, isn't all year, but apparently after the November elections, but before the [02:38.000 --> 02:57.000] swearing-in of the new president in Congress in January. [03:08.000 --> 03:35.000] I'm not convinced it can happen after this year. [03:35.000 --> 04:02.000] I'm not convinced it can happen after this year. [04:02.000 --> 04:28.000] All right, folks, good evening. [04:28.000 --> 04:30.000] This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show. [04:30.000 --> 04:37.000] It is September 19, 2016, if I've got my dates correct anyway. [04:37.000 --> 04:40.000] Currently, the phone lines are off. [04:40.000 --> 04:43.000] I have some information I'm going to put out here. [04:43.000 --> 04:48.000] I'm actually writing a motion to quash an indictment, which will also come out being [04:48.000 --> 04:52.000] a new article on the blog when I am done. [04:52.000 --> 05:02.000] But there is some stuff in this that you have to learn to think differently about, and you [05:02.000 --> 05:06.000] have to learn to argue correctly about. [05:06.000 --> 05:11.000] And this goes beyond just transportation citations. [05:11.000 --> 05:22.000] Like I said, this is a felony indictment that I am using the transportation code as the [05:22.000 --> 05:30.000] argumentative basis that the initial attempt to seize the individual in question was illegal [05:30.000 --> 05:33.000] by the officer. [05:33.000 --> 05:40.000] And thus, the individual was well within their rights to refuse to stop until they came to [05:40.000 --> 05:43.000] a safe location. [05:43.000 --> 05:45.000] Okay? [05:45.000 --> 05:53.000] So if you think that transportation citations don't matter and that the arguments that go [05:53.000 --> 06:01.000] with what transportation is and isn't don't go way beyond transportation itself, think [06:01.000 --> 06:03.000] again. [06:03.000 --> 06:11.000] This is exactly the reason why I chose this particular area to get into. [06:11.000 --> 06:17.000] One, it is the cheapest legal experience you're ever going to get money-wise. [06:17.000 --> 06:22.000] If you lose, it's a couple hundred dollars at most, most of the time, unless you've got [06:22.000 --> 06:24.000] a whole bunch of charges. [06:24.000 --> 06:25.000] Okay? [06:25.000 --> 06:35.000] It's the easiest to learn to fight, and it's the one where you will have more opportunity [06:35.000 --> 06:39.000] to practice a range of things to be done. [06:39.000 --> 06:45.000] There's a reason I chose this, that and the fact that this is where the vast majority [06:45.000 --> 06:52.000] of people will have their first and most frequent encounters with law enforcement. [06:52.000 --> 07:01.000] Now, I said most, not everyone, but most Americans, this system is where most people have a run-in [07:01.000 --> 07:03.000] with the legal system. [07:03.000 --> 07:04.000] Okay? [07:04.000 --> 07:11.000] So that being said, if you want to email me any comments or if you're on Facebook listening [07:11.000 --> 07:17.000] to any of this, go to the event that I posted for the show tonight, which I shared in all [07:17.000 --> 07:23.000] my legal discussion groups that I participate in, as well as on my personal page or any [07:23.000 --> 07:30.000] of my like pages, like Not Engaging Transportation, Law Dog for Tow of Law, and Tow of Law. [07:30.000 --> 07:35.000] You should be able to get to the event from any of those, but if you go to the specific [07:35.000 --> 07:40.000] event that I posted rather than to one of those pages, then I'll be able to see everybody's [07:40.000 --> 07:44.000] conversation as it progresses while I'm doing the show. [07:44.000 --> 07:47.000] If you go to any one of the other ones, I'm not going to see them unless I go to that [07:47.000 --> 07:51.000] page later during a break and look at it, and I wouldn't cross my fingers and hope that [07:51.000 --> 07:52.000] happens. [07:52.000 --> 07:58.000] So that being said, let's get into how this is going to work. [07:58.000 --> 08:03.000] And I'm basically just going to read to you my thoughts as I've written them down to make [08:03.000 --> 08:07.000] these arguments and the way I'm trying to arrange them in this motion to quash. [08:07.000 --> 08:11.000] Now, this is actually a brief in support of that motion. [08:11.000 --> 08:16.000] The actual motion itself is a lot shorter, but the brief has to cover a lot of ground, [08:16.000 --> 08:19.000] and that's where these arguments are going to go. [08:19.000 --> 08:22.000] All right, up and at them. [08:22.000 --> 08:27.000] For several decades now, Texas prosecutors at all levels, prosecutors like District Attorney [08:27.000 --> 08:32.000] Frederico Hernandez and his minions, for instance, in conspiracy and collusion with our own [08:32.000 --> 08:37.000] higher courts have used and abused the power and influence of their official offices and [08:37.000 --> 08:43.000] capacities to deceitfully train our law enforcement officers and lower courts to use and abuse [08:43.000 --> 08:49.000] the unrebuttable legal presumptions codified within the Texas Transportation Code. [08:49.000 --> 08:54.000] And these abuses have slowly but surely aided them in facilitating the abrogation and [08:54.000 --> 08:59.000] derogation of the people's individual right to be free from any and all unreasonable [08:59.000 --> 09:05.000] detention, seizure, searches, and arrest, and to be free from being victimized by the [09:05.000 --> 09:11.000] knowing and willful filing of falsified criminal allegations for which there is no requirement [09:11.000 --> 09:16.000] for the existence of substantive facts and evidence proving any common law, crime, or [09:16.000 --> 09:19.000] true criminal activity. [09:19.000 --> 09:24.000] This highly organized and well-orchestrated criminal activity has resulted in untold billions [09:24.000 --> 09:29.000] of dollars in private property being stolen and countless human lives being ruined or [09:29.000 --> 09:31.000] abruptly ended. [09:31.000 --> 09:36.000] If anyone other than governmental actors were found committing such acts, they would be [09:36.000 --> 09:44.000] immediately charged with fraud, extortion, manslaughter, murder, and criminal RICO charges. [09:44.000 --> 09:49.000] That this level of corruption of our system of justice is allowed to exist and not only [09:49.000 --> 09:56.000] function but actually controls our entire system of government is not only unreasonable [09:56.000 --> 10:01.000] as set forth by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article [10:01.000 --> 10:07.000] 1, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution, it is totally unacceptable as Americans and a [10:07.000 --> 10:12.000] people with any sense at all of justice and fair play. [10:12.000 --> 10:17.000] Common sense would lead one to believe that it should not even be required for respondents [10:17.000 --> 10:23.000] to have to raise the issue that there is no offense codified solely within the Transportation [10:23.000 --> 10:30.000] Code or any other regulatory code that can be lawfully or legally charged against an [10:30.000 --> 10:36.000] individual without first asserting that the individual was engaged in transportation or [10:36.000 --> 10:40.000] the other regulated activity respectively. [10:40.000 --> 10:46.000] At the time of the alleged offense and that there must exist and be submitted into the [10:46.000 --> 10:54.000] record during the evidentiary or jurisdictional challenge phase of any proceeding, the actual [10:54.000 --> 10:58.000] substantive evidence proving same. [10:58.000 --> 11:03.000] It should be constitutionally and legally apparent to any court in our land that the [11:03.000 --> 11:09.000] prosecution's failure to assert the actual primary subject matter within the charging [11:09.000 --> 11:16.000] instrument as an essential element of any regulatory offense is a direct failure to [11:16.000 --> 11:23.000] assert the necessary facts and evidence required to prove and invoke that court's subject matter [11:23.000 --> 11:27.000] and in personum jurisdiction. [11:27.000 --> 11:33.000] It is simply not enough to assert the prima facie existence of all necessary facts and [11:33.000 --> 11:39.000] evidence as that is nothing less than yet another method for the state to insert any [11:39.000 --> 11:46.000] unrebuttable presumptive opinion made by a law enforcement officer, prosecutor or judge [11:46.000 --> 11:49.000] as substantive facts and evidence. [11:49.000 --> 11:52.000] And it simply is not either of these. [11:52.000 --> 11:58.000] From a fundamental and inherent individual rights perspective, the doctrine of prima facie [11:58.000 --> 12:03.000] when used in statutes that are being applied to any individual acting solely within their [12:03.000 --> 12:12.000] common law capacity and as a matter of common right is constitutionally abhorrent and unlawful [12:12.000 --> 12:18.000] when the accused is not allowed to deny the existence of facts and or evidence or offer [12:18.000 --> 12:25.000] rebutting facts and or evidence that would serve to disprove the prima facie elements. [12:25.000 --> 12:31.000] This is equally true when an accused individual is denied in his or her demand that the state [12:31.000 --> 12:37.000] produce or be compelled to produce actual substantive facts and evidence supporting [12:37.000 --> 12:46.000] and proving every element of the alleged defense, including and especially any prima facie elements. [12:46.000 --> 12:52.000] It is a demonstrable fact that statutes authorizing such prima facie presumptions are constantly [12:52.000 --> 12:55.000] abused by the lower courts. [12:55.000 --> 13:00.000] This abuse takes place when city, county and district attorneys are allowed to substitute [13:00.000 --> 13:06.000] unrebuttable legal presumptions in place of the prima facie elements and then declaring [13:06.000 --> 13:19.000] them to be substantive facts and or evidence proving some or all of the required elements [13:19.000 --> 13:21.000] of the offense. [13:21.000 --> 13:26.000] While the accused individual is denied any opportunity to fully or effectually challenge [13:26.000 --> 13:29.000] those presumptions. [13:29.000 --> 13:35.000] One such prima facie element that is always used in such cases is the creation of the [13:35.000 --> 13:40.000] unrebuttable presumption that every individual traveling upon the highway in their private [13:40.000 --> 13:47.000] conveyance is always engaged in transportation and therefore always subject to the transportation [13:47.000 --> 13:54.000] code, regardless of actual history, law, facts and evidence to the contrary. [13:54.000 --> 13:59.000] This is not simply unreasonable by our constitutional standards. [13:59.000 --> 14:04.000] It is an egregious violation of even the most fundamental rights of due process that is [14:04.000 --> 14:09.000] so shocking to the conscience that a respondent is amazed it has never before been raised [14:09.000 --> 14:12.000] within the courts. [14:12.000 --> 14:17.000] Unrebuttable presumptions violate several prime directives of criminal prosecutions. [14:17.000 --> 14:23.000] One, the accused is entitled to an absolute presumption of innocence of every element [14:23.000 --> 14:25.000] of an alleged offense. [14:25.000 --> 14:29.000] Two, it shifts the burden of proof to the accused. [14:29.000 --> 14:35.000] Three, it destroys the right of the accused to proper sufficient and timely notice of [14:35.000 --> 14:40.000] every element of an offense that the state is required to prove. [14:40.000 --> 14:48.000] And four, it constitutes outright in your face judicial activism by actually allowing [14:48.000 --> 14:54.000] judges to legislate from the bench, such as the ability to create alternative applications [14:54.000 --> 15:01.000] and interpretations of law and statute that exceed or ignore legislative scope and intent [15:01.000 --> 15:07.000] or by adding or removing elements of an offense despite legislative scope and intent or the [15:07.000 --> 15:09.000] statutory language itself. [15:09.000 --> 15:15.000] Where a presumption intrudes upon a significant liberty interest, however, it may violate [15:15.000 --> 15:17.000] due process of law. [15:17.000 --> 15:27.000] That site is from Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 543, or I'm sorry, 405 U.S. 645. [15:27.000 --> 15:33.000] Barring special circumstances, however, all that is required is that there is some rational [15:33.000 --> 15:37.000] connection between the basic fact and the presumed fact. [15:37.000 --> 15:45.000] That is Usery v. Turner, Elkhorn Mining Company, 428 U.S. 1. [15:45.000 --> 15:50.000] As respondent understands it, the problem with the unrebuttable presumption of facts supporting [15:50.000 --> 15:55.000] the required elements of a transportation code matter is that any such presumption would [15:55.000 --> 16:01.000] necessarily cast immediate doubt upon any initial claims of reasonable suspicion or [16:01.000 --> 16:07.000] articulable probable cause and the subsequent prosecution based upon either. [16:07.000 --> 16:12.000] Respondent's understanding and fear has been proven true in virtually every case that our [16:12.000 --> 16:19.000] Texas courts have ruled upon that involve any sort of transportation-related offense. [16:19.000 --> 16:24.000] It is respondent's opinion that the courts have taken a completely backwards approach [16:24.000 --> 16:32.000] to their legal, to their analysis of any matter involving virtually any manner of transportation offense. [16:32.000 --> 16:37.000] All right, we're going to take a break and we will come back and continue on with this. [16:37.000 --> 16:43.000] Everyone out there, the phones are off until I complete this presentation of information, [16:43.000 --> 16:47.000] at which time I will turn them on and I will announce that I have turned them on. [16:47.000 --> 16:53.000] So you are not having a problem calling in, there just isn't anywhere at the moment to call in to. [16:53.000 --> 17:00.000] So y'all hang on and we'll be right back after this break. [17:00.000 --> 17:06.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition. [17:06.000 --> 17:11.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that. [17:11.000 --> 17:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [17:17.000 --> 17:25.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [17:25.000 --> 17:31.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [17:31.000 --> 17:39.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [17:39.000 --> 17:47.000] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [17:47.000 --> 17:51.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [17:51.000 --> 17:58.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [17:58.000 --> 18:00.000] Order now. [18:00.000 --> 18:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses? [18:05.000 --> 18:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [18:09.000 --> 18:15.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. [18:15.000 --> 18:21.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. [18:21.000 --> 18:25.000] What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons. [18:25.000 --> 18:27.000] How to answer letters and phone calls. [18:27.000 --> 18:29.000] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [18:29.000 --> 18:34.000] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:34.000 --> 18:39.000] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:39.000 --> 18:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:41.000 --> 18:50.000] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com. [18:50.000 --> 19:01.000] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [19:01.000 --> 19:11.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:11.000 --> 19:39.000] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio and we are presenting some information on quashing a felony indictment using transportation code arguments. [19:39.000 --> 19:48.000] And you have to remember that in this particular case, the individual is charged with felony evasion by use of a vehicle. [19:48.000 --> 20:05.000] Now, in the penal code statute they're charging him under, it specifically states that the term vehicle has the same meaning as that defined by the transportation code. [20:05.000 --> 20:18.000] So by that designation, the vehicle would only apply in the penal code version of this offense if the individual was engaging in transportation at the time. [20:18.000 --> 20:28.000] Because that's the only way that they could be in a vehicle is that they are using that device for the purpose of engaging in transportation. [20:28.000 --> 20:43.000] It's not legally a vehicle unless that primary element of transportation exists because vehicle as defined by statute only exists in relation to transportation, [20:43.000 --> 20:51.000] at least as far as this charge goes and as transportation itself goes and any offense within the transportation code goes. [20:51.000 --> 21:07.000] Okay? Now, the other problem they have with the felony indictment under the penal code is that there is an almost identical statute in the transportation code dealing with evading using a vehicle. [21:07.000 --> 21:22.000] However, there is one big difference. There's two actually. The transportation code does not require evidence of evading, [21:22.000 --> 21:33.000] whereas the penal code version does not require the element of refuse to stop. It simply says fled. [21:33.000 --> 21:46.000] Okay? Whereas the transportation code version says if the officer has activated their lights and tried to pull the individual over and the individual refuses to stop the vehicle. [21:46.000 --> 21:56.000] Now, in this particular instance, it's not that the individual refused to stop, period. They just refused to stop in the location where the officer was trying to pull them over. [21:56.000 --> 22:09.000] And there's all kinds of safety reasons why he wasn't going to do that. Okay? Doing so could literally have gotten this man killed where he was. [22:09.000 --> 22:18.000] He signaled the officer. He let the officer know that he was looking for a, he was headed toward a safe place where he knew he could pull over and not risk puncturing his tires [22:18.000 --> 22:28.000] and getting stranded out in the middle of nowhere on 100 degree Texas day with no phone service where he was to call for assistance. [22:28.000 --> 22:38.000] And he could not count on assistance from DPS, the Sheriff's Department, or Border Patrol because every one of these agencies had already proven time and time again [22:38.000 --> 22:50.000] that their goal is to cause this man and his family harm and injury. They would have been happy to have left him stranded out there. [22:50.000 --> 22:59.000] Had I been in his position, I would have waved at the DPS officer too. I just would have used one finger. [22:59.000 --> 23:11.000] Now that being said, let's continue on. Regardless of the court, the analysis always seems to begin with the false, unrebuttable presumption that substantive evidence [23:11.000 --> 23:21.000] or testimony actually exists in the record that allegedly proves that the accused individual was acting as a carrier, operator, or driver. [23:21.000 --> 23:26.000] And we're going to call those legal capacity or capacities for the rest of the motion. [23:26.000 --> 23:36.000] Now also understand that this, I'm editing this where this also says that it has evidence proving jurisdiction of the court and it doesn't. [23:36.000 --> 23:46.000] They never have any jurisdictional evidence entered into the record proving that the court has subject matter jurisdiction and thus in personum jurisdiction. [23:46.000 --> 23:55.000] And the reason they don't want to have to have that evidence is because it would also negate their ability to prosecute the charge [23:55.000 --> 24:09.000] because no evidence of transportation means no ability whatsoever to commit the alleged offense because they are legally bound together. [24:09.000 --> 24:19.000] You cannot commit any offense within the transportation code unless you are first engaging in transportation. [24:19.000 --> 24:30.000] You would think a court and those that sit on the bench and those that argue to prosecute people and ruin their lives and take their money and whatever else [24:30.000 --> 24:34.000] would actually understand this. But they don't. [24:34.000 --> 24:41.000] The one that called into the show and argued vehemently with me how wrong I was is a perfect example of that. [24:41.000 --> 24:52.000] I've been an attorney for 35 years. I've argued all these important cases, but I don't know a damn thing about there having to be an actual piece of evidence [24:52.000 --> 24:58.000] proving that you were engaged in the activity that constitutes the legal subject matter. [24:58.000 --> 25:05.000] Why would I have to prove the legal subject matter? What does that matter? It matters for everything. [25:05.000 --> 25:17.000] Transportation is not an element of a transportation-related offense. It is the primary element of every transportation offense. [25:17.000 --> 25:23.000] You get that? It's sort of like building a house with no foundation in midair. [25:23.000 --> 25:35.000] All right. This first false and unrebuttable legal presumption then leads to the second, that while acting in one of the aforementioned legal capacities, [25:35.000 --> 25:41.000] the accused individual was in control of a commercial motor or vehicle. [25:41.000 --> 25:54.000] The first and second false and unrebuttable legal presumptions finally lead us to the third, which is in order for unrebuttable legal presumptions one and two [25:54.000 --> 26:02.000] to be legally true at the time of the alleged offense, the accused individual absolutely was engaging in transportation. [26:02.000 --> 26:07.000] Because if he wasn't, one and two cannot be true. [26:07.000 --> 26:20.000] So by the time we get to the third unrebuttable presumption, it must be that they were engaging in transportation or the whole house of cards falls down. [26:20.000 --> 26:25.000] And if all of these false, unrebuttable legal presumptions are irrebuttably presumed to be true, [26:25.000 --> 26:31.000] regardless of the fact that there isn't any substantive facts or evidence proving them to be true, [26:31.000 --> 26:37.000] then the court's position is that there is no longer any legal question as to whether or not the accused individual [26:37.000 --> 26:44.000] was under the legal subject matter jurisdiction of the special statute's regulatory exception, [26:44.000 --> 26:53.000] an exception allegedly suspending the accused individual inherent protected right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, [26:53.000 --> 27:03.000] including and especially those based entirely upon false, unrebuttable legal presumptions, [27:03.000 --> 27:15.000] an exception that also alleges to authorize any law enforcement officer or officers to seize, detain, search, or arrest the accused without a proper warrant [27:15.000 --> 27:25.000] and without specific articulable facts or evidence supporting reasonable suspicion or probable cause of an actual crime. [27:25.000 --> 27:32.000] The only demonstrable evidence that is needed to prove that these false, unrebuttable legal presumptions exist [27:32.000 --> 27:41.000] and are being used to their full force and effect is to walk through a single scenario that happens by a very conservative estimate [27:41.000 --> 27:48.000] thousands of times a day across America, a traffic stop for allegedly speeding. [27:48.000 --> 27:53.000] I will set this example in Texas for the sake of expediency and clarity. [27:53.000 --> 27:57.000] The officer signals for you to pull over and you comply. [27:57.000 --> 28:00.000] The officer approaches your window and says, [28:00.000 --> 28:11.000] I stopped you because you were going 65 miles per hour in a 60-mile-per-hour speed zone. Please give me your license, registration, and proof of financial responsibility. [28:11.000 --> 28:21.000] In that one statement, the officer has demonstrated every single unrebuttable legal presumption we have discussed. [28:21.000 --> 28:31.000] He has automatically established the false and unrebuttable presumptions that you are acting in the legal capacity of a carrier, operator, or driver, [28:31.000 --> 28:38.000] the only legal persons within the transportation code capable of committing an offense. [28:38.000 --> 28:42.000] Okay? Understand that. [28:42.000 --> 28:51.000] And they are carriers, operators, or drivers in control of a commercial or slash motor or slash vehicle. [28:51.000 --> 29:02.000] And are required to have a license to have their car registered and to be covered by some legally authorized form of financial responsibility [29:02.000 --> 29:09.000] because you are presumed to be engaging in transportation. [29:09.000 --> 29:19.000] And he has absolutely zero substantive facts and evidence to support these presumptions, [29:19.000 --> 29:37.000] which also means that he has absolutely zero articulable facts supporting reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe or prove that you committed any crime whatsoever. [29:37.000 --> 29:46.000] Now, folks, this should be something they understand, but obviously they don't or they don't want to. [29:46.000 --> 29:50.000] And they most certainly don't want you to. [29:50.000 --> 29:52.000] All right, folks, I only got a little bit more. [29:52.000 --> 29:54.000] After that, we'll start taking your calls. [29:54.000 --> 29:55.000] So y'all hang in there. [29:55.000 --> 30:17.000] We'll be right back after this break. [30:25.000 --> 30:27.000] Your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:27.000 --> 30:28.000] So protect your rights. [30:28.000 --> 30:32.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:32.000 --> 30:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:35.000 --> 30:42.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:42.000 --> 30:46.000] Start over with Startpage. [30:46.000 --> 30:52.000] If you're looking for a healthy alternative to plastic water bottles that contain the chemical bisphenol A or BPA, [30:52.000 --> 30:55.000] here are three reasons to consider glass. [30:55.000 --> 30:59.000] BPA-free or not, plastic water bottles still release other chemicals. [30:59.000 --> 31:07.000] Metal water bottles often have plastic liners, and many are made in China, which worries people like me who know that country's history with tainted products. [31:07.000 --> 31:11.000] Finally, metal containers can leach and leave a metallic taste in the water. [31:11.000 --> 31:12.000] Yuck. [31:12.000 --> 31:15.000] Water from glass bottles tastes great naturally with no chemicals. [31:15.000 --> 31:22.000] And if you're worried about broken glass, the new bottles are made of resilient tempered glass, and many have rubberized protective covers. [31:22.000 --> 31:24.000] I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. [31:24.000 --> 31:30.000] More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.000 --> 31:31.000] What are you thinking? [31:31.000 --> 31:37.000] Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month. [31:37.000 --> 31:44.000] If USA.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, [31:44.000 --> 31:48.000] kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever, [31:48.000 --> 31:53.000] it alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products. [31:53.000 --> 31:55.000] That saves you space, time, and money. [31:55.000 --> 32:02.000] Call 888-910-4367 or visit musa.org. [32:02.000 --> 32:05.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [32:05.000 --> 32:10.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [32:10.000 --> 32:13.000] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:13.000 --> 32:16.000] Defending those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [32:16.000 --> 32:20.000] the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:20.000 --> 32:26.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:26.000 --> 32:29.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:29.000 --> 32:34.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is [32:34.000 --> 32:36.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:36.000 --> 32:41.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:41.000 --> 32:45.000] Ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [32:45.000 --> 32:50.000] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:50.000 --> 32:54.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:54.000 --> 33:12.000] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:12.000 --> 33:32.000] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, and other useful resource material. [33:32.000 --> 33:42.000] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, and other useful resource material. [34:02.000 --> 34:12.000] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. [34:12.000 --> 34:17.000] All right, a little bit I got left here. I'm just going to summarize that. [34:17.000 --> 34:30.000] We're getting into the enactment of SB 971 to prove that the regulated subject matter of that bill and the code in its entirety is transportation and transportation only. [34:30.000 --> 34:44.000] Everything in that code, whether it be an offense for licensing, an offense for registration, an offense for speeding, an offense for inspection or financial responsibility, [34:44.000 --> 35:07.000] or any other offense in the entire transportation code must, as a matter of law and fact, be related to the activity or the business activity, the privileged business activity, of transportation. [35:07.000 --> 35:18.000] It isn't just anything and everything on the road, despite what they want you to believe. [35:18.000 --> 35:28.000] Now, again, this particular aspect of this particular argument, set of arguments, has never been adjudicated anywhere that I can find. [35:28.000 --> 35:40.000] No case law, nothing. So this is entirely an argument of first impression as far as this particular methodology of application. [35:40.000 --> 35:56.000] I have yet to find a single case anywhere arguing misapplication of the subject matter or the absolute nonexistence of any facts or evidence substantiating the allegation of the subject matter. [35:56.000 --> 36:16.000] But on top of that, what I have never seen is any prosecutor that has ever alleged the primary subject matter element that is the linchpin to every allegation to be made under that regulatory code. [36:16.000 --> 36:35.000] You can't commit a licensing offense unless you're someone who acts as a carrier, operator, or driver of a motor vehicle for the purpose of engaging in transportation. [36:35.000 --> 36:50.000] They all go together. They're not separate. You cannot be charged with being a driver of a motor vehicle without an allegation of being engaged in transportation. [36:50.000 --> 37:02.000] Okay, that's like a gay morden charging you with illegally fishing without water or a fish. [37:02.000 --> 37:11.000] It's ridiculous. But that's what they're doing. [37:11.000 --> 37:19.000] The gay morden can't come into your house and charge you with illegally fishing simply because you're cooking a bass on the stove. [37:19.000 --> 37:26.000] He can't charge you with illegally fishing just because you have a frozen fish in your freezer. [37:26.000 --> 37:38.000] The only way he could charge you with illegally fishing is if you were fishing under the regulated privilege of fishing for the commercial purpose for which it is intended, [37:38.000 --> 37:52.000] and you were doing so to sell that fish without a proper license because that fish is a public resource and you do not have a right to sell it for private profit or gain for yourself. [37:52.000 --> 38:01.000] Now, you can consume it yourself. You can catch it and let someone else eat it, but you can't sell it to them. [38:01.000 --> 38:14.000] That, ladies and gentlemen, is the entire regulated privilege to which the license attaches, the ability to take something that doesn't belong to you alone and generate a profit from it. [38:14.000 --> 38:23.000] That's a privileged activity in relation to a public resource. That's why commercial fishermen have to have licenses. [38:23.000 --> 38:27.000] That's why commercial drivers have to have licenses. [38:27.000 --> 38:49.000] That's why those engaging in transportation have to have a license because they are responsible for the wear and tear of the public's roads while they are generating a profit for themselves using those roads. [38:49.000 --> 39:05.000] Now, you would think that would be a concept that the dumbest person on the planet could understand, unless, of course, that dumbest person also possesses a bar card. [39:05.000 --> 39:09.000] Okay? [39:09.000 --> 39:17.000] And we know this because they would argue with a stump about what kind of tree it used to be. [39:17.000 --> 39:25.000] And yet, they wouldn't know one tree from another. [39:25.000 --> 39:30.000] This is the kind of thing we're having to deal with in these courts. [39:30.000 --> 39:40.000] It's getting to the point where you can no longer trust the opinion of a professional about anything because they are no longer professionals. [39:40.000 --> 39:45.000] They are superficial doers. [39:45.000 --> 40:01.000] They learn just enough to get by, to make you think they know what they're doing and what they're talking about, when in fact, they do not. [40:01.000 --> 40:05.000] They do not. [40:05.000 --> 40:23.000] I would not trust an attorney to tell me he was on fire if I watched him pour the gas over his head and like to match himself, though I would volunteer to help. [40:23.000 --> 40:25.000] They just can't be trusted. [40:25.000 --> 40:31.000] They have ulterior motives in every single thing they tell us. [40:31.000 --> 40:49.000] Everything they do is about controlling the rest of us and controlling the system under which we believe we are bound instead of they being the ones that are bound. [40:49.000 --> 40:53.000] They've convinced you that you work for them. [40:53.000 --> 41:00.000] They've convinced you that they are more intelligent than you. [41:00.000 --> 41:09.000] When I can take them pretty much on any subject and prove that wrong. [41:09.000 --> 41:20.000] There's a line out of the movie Smokey and the Bandit where Burt Reynolds and Sally Field are walking through the woods while they're taking a break there and Jerry Reed is getting food and gas for his truck. [41:20.000 --> 41:31.000] And they're asking each other, Burt and Sally, do you know this person? Do you know that person? You ever seen this? You ever seen that? And they're both saying no, no, like they don't have anything in common, right? [41:31.000 --> 41:48.000] And Burt Reynolds looks at her and says, depending upon where you're standing, when someone asks you a question, wherever you're standing in the country will determine how dumb you really are. [41:48.000 --> 41:59.000] And that's true. If you go from a place where you are knowledgeable and familiar into a place where you are not, you're the dumb one when you're encountering someone that lives there. [41:59.000 --> 42:19.000] Okay? Plain and simple. That would be true in almost any walk of life except for law. And no, I'm not talking about my dog. That's his name. But even he's got more brains than some of these attorneys. [42:19.000 --> 42:31.000] Attorneys have the only occupation that anyone can learn to do if they have the capability to actually read and understand the legalese. [42:31.000 --> 42:42.000] Now understand that attorneys spend a whole lot of money to get a high-priced education to teach them to read these law books and understand the law. [42:42.000 --> 42:55.000] They go into debt for years unless they got rich parents to begin with, which some do, some don't. But the fact of the matter is it doesn't matter. [42:55.000 --> 43:18.000] Rich or poor, they're stupid because either, A, they went into huge amounts of debt to learn what I've managed to learn with a library card and a computer for free, or they spend all that money and still don't know what the hell they are doing. [43:18.000 --> 43:26.000] And they demonstrate it every time they open their mouth or they file a legal pleading. [43:26.000 --> 43:48.000] For instance, in this particular case, you would think that someone who has been a state prosecutor in the district attorney's office for a couple of decades would know what is required in the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Texas Constitution to invoke the jurisdiction of a court. [43:48.000 --> 44:01.000] But when we get back, I'm going to show you that they don't. And FYI, the phones are now on 512-646-1984. [44:19.000 --> 44:28.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [44:28.000 --> 44:34.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:34.000 --> 44:43.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:43.000 --> 44:52.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [44:52.000 --> 45:01.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [45:01.000 --> 45:13.000] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 9204 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas. [45:13.000 --> 45:19.000] Find brave new books and chase pain to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [45:23.000 --> 45:31.000] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [45:31.000 --> 45:38.000] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. [45:38.000 --> 45:44.000] That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. [45:44.000 --> 45:48.000] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products. [45:48.000 --> 46:15.000] Naturespureorganics.com. [46:15.000 --> 46:26.000] All right, folks, we are back. [46:26.000 --> 46:32.000] This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984. [46:32.000 --> 46:42.000] But like I said, they pay for this education, they take these public offices, they hold them for years, and they still don't know what they're doing. [46:42.000 --> 46:52.000] This district attorney in this particular case and his minions ran to the grand jury to get an indictment against this man, [46:52.000 --> 47:06.000] and yet never filed a valid criminal complaint or information, as is required by the Texas Constitution and the Code of Criminal Procedure. [47:06.000 --> 47:15.000] Okay, you get that? They went straight to the grand jury to get an indictment minutes before this gentleman was scheduled to have his examining trial [47:15.000 --> 47:23.000] for the express purpose of circumventing his right to an appealable finding of probable cause [47:23.000 --> 47:29.000] and prevented him from getting that appealable finding of probable cause. [47:29.000 --> 47:42.000] Because the Texas courts ignore the rules of procedure, they ignore the Bill of Rights, they ignore the Texas Constitution when it suits them. [47:42.000 --> 47:51.000] And they're all attorneys, every last one of them. [47:51.000 --> 48:01.000] So you see, having a bar card isn't a sign of honor. [48:01.000 --> 48:09.000] Okay, you may as well, in my opinion, pin a big old fresh stinky dog turd to your lapel and say, look at me, smell my flower, [48:09.000 --> 48:18.000] showing both your IQ and your lack of sensory perception in the odiferous fashion. [48:18.000 --> 48:25.000] Okay? Or the olfactory sensors, I guess I should say. [48:25.000 --> 48:32.000] It's just stupid. The bar card does not convince me you know what you're talking about. [48:32.000 --> 48:41.000] So telling me you're an attorney is in no way going to improve your standing to argue with me or to tell me I'm wrong. [48:41.000 --> 48:50.000] Because I will put my research, my ability to tell you exactly where I can find everything and link it together [48:50.000 --> 48:59.000] against your ability to sit there and naysay with no evidence any day of the week. [48:59.000 --> 49:04.000] Any day of the week. [49:04.000 --> 49:12.000] All right. That being said, let's start taking calls. First caller up is McDonald in Wisconsin. [49:12.000 --> 49:17.000] McDonald? Is that correct? [49:17.000 --> 49:19.000] Hello? Hello? [49:19.000 --> 49:23.000] Yes. No. Well, the last name is McDonald. [49:23.000 --> 49:24.000] All right. [49:24.000 --> 49:26.000] I'm actually calling out of Texas. [49:26.000 --> 49:28.000] You are? Okay. [49:28.000 --> 49:34.000] Yes, sir. I actually sent you an email earlier in the month, maybe last month. [49:34.000 --> 49:39.000] I have a 10-year-old charge out of Florida. [49:39.000 --> 49:40.000] For what? [49:40.000 --> 49:46.000] I was accused of DUI. [49:46.000 --> 49:57.000] Given the circumstances at the time, I had neither the financial ability or the inclination to deal with it and I left. [49:57.000 --> 50:04.000] I came back to Texas, filed for my driver's license, received it, renewed it. [50:04.000 --> 50:12.000] After four years, probably two weeks after I got the new driver's license, they sent me a letter and said, [50:12.000 --> 50:18.000] hey, oh, that thing's suspended. You can't have that because you've got this thing out of Florida. [50:18.000 --> 50:25.000] So as a result, I ended up going to court, saw a judge, got an occupational license, and I've been running that thing. [50:25.000 --> 50:35.000] Well, it'll be the second time around, which would be four years coming in October, and then I can't do it again. [50:35.000 --> 50:40.000] So I'm up the creek without a paddle with no driver's license. [50:40.000 --> 50:51.000] Now, I've done a lot of research and I still cannot get my hands on how to approach Florida to get them to release that. [50:51.000 --> 50:57.000] Well, why do you want the license? [50:57.000 --> 51:03.000] Um, I don't. [51:03.000 --> 51:08.000] Whatever you just did, fix it, because now you sound like you're singing in the bottom of a tin can. [51:08.000 --> 51:11.000] Oh, I'm sorry. How about now? [51:11.000 --> 51:15.000] You just got very far away. Now you're on Pluto. [51:15.000 --> 51:16.000] All right. How about now? [51:16.000 --> 51:17.000] There you go. [51:17.000 --> 51:20.000] All right. [51:20.000 --> 51:27.000] Driver's license? Well, because jobs say you have to have them. [51:27.000 --> 51:28.000] Okay. [51:28.000 --> 51:32.000] I've never been able to get around that. [51:32.000 --> 51:39.000] Okay. Do you act as a delivery driver for the place you work? [51:39.000 --> 51:50.000] Some of the places, I'm self-employed at the time, but I do occasionally take jobs for companies and they require driver's license. [51:50.000 --> 51:54.000] Well, that isn't my question. That isn't my question. [51:54.000 --> 52:05.000] My question is, do you hire yourself out as a delivery driver or some sort of driver to these companies? [52:05.000 --> 52:10.000] No. So I am not putting myself in that transportation situation. [52:10.000 --> 52:16.000] Correct. Their lack of understanding of that, however, is what's causing you a problem. [52:16.000 --> 52:17.000] Exactly. [52:17.000 --> 52:34.000] And this is exactly what I was getting at earlier when I said that this transportation stuff has far more far-reaching effects in what it does illegally and unconstitutionally to intrude upon our day-to-day life. [52:34.000 --> 52:36.000] Amen. [52:36.000 --> 52:39.000] Okay. [52:39.000 --> 52:43.000] So therein lies the question, what is the practical rent? [52:43.000 --> 52:52.000] Well, you're asking me to solve a problem in Florida without having been from Florida or studied Florida's statutes to understand the concept. [52:52.000 --> 53:11.000] But what I can tell you is, is if you actually read them and learned to understand them, you would find that they are almost identical to what Texas has and Connecticut has and many other states have because they're all based upon the same standardized statutory templates. [53:11.000 --> 53:13.000] Yes, sir. [53:13.000 --> 53:14.000] Okay. [53:14.000 --> 53:20.000] That much I have discovered that there is a great similarity between Florida's laws and Texas's laws. [53:20.000 --> 53:23.000] That's true of every state. [53:23.000 --> 53:30.000] The exception to that in some cases is Louisiana and Colorado. [53:30.000 --> 53:31.000] Okay. [53:31.000 --> 53:34.000] Most other ones, no problem. [53:34.000 --> 53:41.000] Unfortunately, the county that this occurred in, they don't purge their records, forget this, 15 years. [53:41.000 --> 53:44.000] It doesn't matter when they purge their records. [53:44.000 --> 53:52.000] What matters is how far they got in the case against you before you left. [53:52.000 --> 53:55.000] See, there's these two little things. [53:55.000 --> 54:02.000] There's called the speedy trial clock, and then there's called the statute of limitations. [54:02.000 --> 54:09.000] The statute of limitations is how long they have to prosecute or to file to prosecute. [54:09.000 --> 54:10.000] Okay. [54:10.000 --> 54:13.000] They are not mutually exclusive. [54:13.000 --> 54:21.000] The statute of limitations does not stop because they filed the charge to prosecute you. [54:21.000 --> 54:31.000] The only time the statute of limitations stops tolling is if you flee the state and they issue a warrant for you as a fugitive from the law. [54:31.000 --> 54:33.000] And they did. [54:33.000 --> 54:34.000] Okay. [54:34.000 --> 54:47.000] As a matter of fact, shortly after I got back to Texas, believe it or not, first date with my wife, who was my girlfriend at the time, first date out, got pulled over. [54:47.000 --> 54:56.000] Officer wrote me a speeding ticket and informed me that I had a warrant out of Florida, but it was Florida only, and I was on my way. [54:56.000 --> 54:58.000] And so that's how I knew. [54:58.000 --> 55:08.000] And since then, I have dug in and discovered a lot of other things I pulled up, you know, from that county's records and found out the chain of events. [55:08.000 --> 55:11.000] But I do know the warrant was issued. [55:11.000 --> 55:12.000] Okay. [55:12.000 --> 55:18.000] Well, then the only thing you're going to be able to do is to go back and contest it. [55:18.000 --> 55:20.000] That's what I thought. [55:20.000 --> 55:21.000] Okay. [55:21.000 --> 55:29.000] However, that should be fairly easy to do considering what evidence do they have of this DUI. [55:29.000 --> 55:36.000] Well, that's the beauty of it is that the officer saw me sitting in a car. [55:36.000 --> 55:42.000] I turned into a convenience store parking lot at approximately 2 o'clock in the morning. [55:42.000 --> 55:49.000] And to my luck, there was a sheriff sitting there out of his vehicle talking to someone else at the corner of the building. [55:49.000 --> 55:55.000] I got out of my car, walked into the store, hoping I could hang out there long enough that he would leave. [55:55.000 --> 55:56.000] He did not. [55:56.000 --> 55:57.000] I came out. [55:57.000 --> 56:05.000] He asked me to come over, approached me, started talking, said I was intoxicated, charged me with DUI. [56:05.000 --> 56:08.000] What made him want to talk to you? [56:08.000 --> 56:12.000] Because he saw me get out of that car and knew I had driven it up into that parking lot. [56:12.000 --> 56:15.000] Which does not answer my question. [56:15.000 --> 56:21.000] What else was going on that would have given him a reason to come talk to you? [56:21.000 --> 56:26.000] When you got out of the car, was the first thing you did fall flat on your face and take 15 minutes to get up? [56:26.000 --> 56:28.000] Absolutely not. [56:28.000 --> 56:29.000] Okay. [56:29.000 --> 56:38.000] So what was he observing or claiming to have observed that had him asking to speak with you? [56:38.000 --> 56:51.000] In his report, he stated that he saw me sitting in the driver's seat, gripping the steering wheel, staring forward for a period of time. [56:51.000 --> 56:54.000] And that garnered his suspicion. [56:54.000 --> 56:55.000] Suspicion of what? [56:55.000 --> 56:57.000] That you were thinking? [56:57.000 --> 56:58.000] Exactly. [56:58.000 --> 57:05.000] That you were focused on the side of the building, trying to see if you could identify what the bug there was? [57:05.000 --> 57:06.000] Exactly. [57:06.000 --> 57:08.000] And I understand where you're... [57:08.000 --> 57:09.000] Did he breathalyze? [57:09.000 --> 57:10.000] No, I refused. [57:10.000 --> 57:14.000] Did he feel sobriety test? [57:14.000 --> 57:15.000] Negative. [57:15.000 --> 57:17.000] Did he blood draw? [57:17.000 --> 57:18.000] Negative. [57:18.000 --> 57:22.000] So I'll ask the question again. [57:22.000 --> 57:31.000] What evidence do they have of DUI? [57:31.000 --> 57:35.000] Well, I like the fact that, first of all, I wasn't driving. [57:35.000 --> 57:36.000] Okay. [57:36.000 --> 57:43.000] Stop and listen to my question and answer my question. [57:43.000 --> 57:46.000] Don't go off on tangents. [57:46.000 --> 57:54.000] What evidence do they have of DUI? [57:54.000 --> 57:55.000] None. [57:55.000 --> 57:59.000] Other than in his statement, he said that he saw an open... [57:59.000 --> 58:03.000] There is no other than. [58:03.000 --> 58:05.000] There is no other than. [58:05.000 --> 58:06.000] Okay. [58:06.000 --> 58:08.000] He said he saw an open beer in the console room. [58:08.000 --> 58:09.000] Really? [58:09.000 --> 58:11.000] Did he confiscate the beer? [58:11.000 --> 58:12.000] No. [58:12.000 --> 58:14.000] Did he bag it and tag it? [58:14.000 --> 58:16.000] Did he bag it and tag it? [58:16.000 --> 58:17.000] Not to my knowledge. [58:17.000 --> 58:21.000] Then what evidence does he have? [58:21.000 --> 58:23.000] He can say anything he wants. [58:23.000 --> 58:25.000] Doesn't make it factual. [58:25.000 --> 58:26.000] Very... [58:26.000 --> 58:27.000] Exactly. [58:27.000 --> 58:29.000] Because I know for a fact it's not true. [58:29.000 --> 58:33.000] Okay. Hang on just a minute and we'll try to finish this up on the other side. [58:33.000 --> 58:35.000] One of us will listen and get this right. [58:35.000 --> 58:36.000] All right, folks. [58:36.000 --> 58:38.000] We'll be right back after the break. [58:38.000 --> 58:41.000] 512-646-1984. [58:41.000 --> 58:42.000] Get in line. [58:42.000 --> 58:50.000] We'll be right back. [58:50.000 --> 58:54.000] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. [58:54.000 --> 58:58.000] Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.000 --> 59:02.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, [59:02.000 --> 59:07.000] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [59:07.000 --> 59:09.000] Enter the recovery version. [59:09.000 --> 59:13.000] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [59:13.000 --> 59:18.000] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.000 --> 59:22.000] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [59:22.000 --> 59:28.000] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.000 --> 59:33.000] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.000 --> 59:44.000] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:44.000 --> 59:48.000] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:48.000 --> 59:51.000] That's freestudybible.com. [59:51.000 --> 01:00:01.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:06.000] The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, [01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:09.000] providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market, [01:00:09.000 --> 01:00:13.000] Today in History, news updates, [01:00:13.000 --> 01:00:22.000] and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:25.000] Markets for Friday, the 16th of September, 2016, [01:00:25.000 --> 01:00:29.000] are currently trading with gold at $1,309.71 an ounce, [01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:32.000] silver $18.76 an ounce, [01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:35.000] Texas crude $43.91 a barrel, [01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:45.000] and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $607 U.S. currency. [01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:49.000] Today in History, the year 1920, the Wall Street bombing occurred. [01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:53.000] At 1201 noon in front of the J.P. Morgan building in the Financial District of Manhattan, [01:00:53.000 --> 01:00:57.000] a bomb and a horse wagon exploded killing 30 people immediately, [01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:00.000] while another 8 people died afterwards due to injuries, [01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:03.000] and at least 143 people were seriously injured. [01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:05.000] The bombing was never officially solved, [01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:09.000] but many investigators and historians believe that the Wall Street bombing was carried out [01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:12.000] by the Galenists, or Italian syndicalist anarchist groups [01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:15.000] responsible for a series of bombings the previous year, [01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:18.000] thought to have been stirred up about due to post-war social unrest, [01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:27.000] labor struggles, and anti-capitalist agitation in the United States. [01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:30.000] In recent news, Obama hosted a meeting at the Oval Office [01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:33.000] with former Mayor of New York Michael Bloomberg, [01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:35.000] former Treasury Secretary under George W. Bush Hank Paulson, [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:37.000] Atlanta Mayor Kason Reid, [01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:40.000] Ohio Governor John Kasich, former contender for the Republican presidential bid, [01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:42.000] and many other individuals. [01:01:42.000 --> 01:01:45.000] The topic of discussion, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, [01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:47.000] the 12-Nation Pacific Rim Free Trade Deal, [01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:49.000] and how to make it legislation. [01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:51.000] It seems that the President, being on the last stretch of his presidency, [01:01:51.000 --> 01:01:56.000] and with both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton at least rhetorically opposed to the 12-Nation Treaty, [01:01:56.000 --> 01:02:00.000] establishment insiders like politician John Kasich is working overtime [01:02:00.000 --> 01:02:02.000] with the President for free trade, so-called, [01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:05.000] he told the media during the White House press briefing. [01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:08.000] This one, TPP, is much different than even NAFTA. [01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:12.000] This is China. This is Russia. These are fledgling countries in Asia. [01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:14.000] And we want to pivot to Asia? We have to do this. [01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:18.000] This is an opportunity for Congress to carry out its responsibility. [01:02:18.000 --> 01:02:21.000] You got to get this done. I'd love to think it could happen next year. [01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:24.000] I'm not convinced it can happen after this year. [01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:27.000] So, in other words, get ready for a sneaky legislative session this fall, [01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:31.000] since Kasich also defended the prospect of Obama pushing TPP [01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:34.000] towards the lame-duck season of Congress, [01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:38.000] which, no, isn't all year, but apparently after the November elections, [01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:42.000] but before the swearing-in of the new President and Congress in January. [01:02:43.000 --> 01:02:45.000] The Mozart Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. [01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:48.000] If you have a product or service you'd like to advertise with us, [01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:53.000] feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257. [01:02:53.000 --> 01:02:58.000] This is Rick Brody with your Lowdown for September 16th, 2016. [01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:48.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:03:48.000 --> 01:03:50.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, [01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:55.000] the call in number 512-646-1984, [01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:58.000] and we are still talking with Mr. McDonald. [01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:01.000] All right, let's see if we can wrap this up here. [01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:06.000] They have zero physical evidence, right? [01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:07.000] Correct. [01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:11.000] How many years has it been since you were in Florida? [01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:16.000] I've gone, since the offense, 10 years. [01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:22.000] How many clones do you have? [01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:25.000] Oh, my father might say him, but I say none. [01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:35.000] Well, how many people do you know that look enough like you, you could be related? [01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:37.000] Two. [01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:40.000] All right, well, you're going to need at least four more, or three more. [01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:41.000] Okay. [01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:43.000] For a total of six. [01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:46.000] All you guys get together, take a road trip, [01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:50.000] present yourself to the court down in Florida and demand a police lineup [01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:55.000] and that the officer identify you in the crowd. [01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:57.000] Okay. [01:04:57.000 --> 01:05:02.000] Now, that being said, what if the officer is no longer with the force? [01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:04.000] I have not clarified whether or not. [01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:08.000] Well, is that your problem? [01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:12.000] No, that's the state's problem, but it's definitely good for me. [01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:14.000] That would be good for me, wouldn't it? [01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:17.000] Then why ask the question if you already know the answer? [01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:20.000] All right, more to the point. [01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:25.000] So the only way I'm going to resolve this is if I go back, turn myself in, [01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:29.000] post a bond, and wait for a court date. [01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:33.000] Or whatever terms and conditions they set, you could simply file, [01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:36.000] you're going to have to do something to clear the warrant. [01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:41.000] That means either going back or filing a motion to quash. [01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:42.000] Good. [01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:43.000] Can I do that from Texas? [01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:45.000] You can do that from anywhere. [01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:47.000] Whether or not they'll accept it without you being present, [01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:52.000] that's a whole other matter. [01:05:52.000 --> 01:05:55.000] Because I certainly don't want to get lawyers involved if I don't have to. [01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:00.000] They've already given me their grand prize of $3,500 to take care of this, [01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:03.000] and I scoffed and moved on. [01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:06.000] Yeah, well, in any case, if you're not going to pay them, [01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:09.000] then you better be the one to learn. [01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:11.000] Absolutely, and I'm learning every day, [01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:15.000] and I can't thank you enough for the information that you've put out for us, [01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:20.000] for those that are willing to stand up and fight and not roll over. [01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:23.000] Your information is invaluable to me. [01:06:23.000 --> 01:06:26.000] And on that note, I would like to ask one other thing. [01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:30.000] Do you have any information available on Ad Valerum? [01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:32.000] I am adamant about it. [01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:34.000] I've got lots of information about it. [01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:36.000] What I don't have is time to get into it. [01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:37.000] That's fine. [01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:38.000] Is it in your archives? [01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:40.000] I've went through a lot in your archives. [01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:44.000] No, I haven't dealt with it on the show a lot. [01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:46.000] I've talked about it from time to time, [01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:49.000] and I haven't got to sit down and do up all the legal paperwork [01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:51.000] and everything that would go with it, [01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:54.000] because I've been concentrating so hard on this other stuff. [01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:57.000] Right. [01:06:57.000 --> 01:06:59.000] Ad Valerum is not really hard to understand. [01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:03.000] If you just simply go back and study the prior versions of the Texas Constitution, [01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:07.000] you will find out very, very fast the state can't do what it's doing, [01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:13.000] and the reason you have to force them to understand that is this. [01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:18.000] The Texas Constitution is the people's authorization to the government. [01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:22.000] It is not the government's authorization to the people. [01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:28.000] What it cannot do, however, as an authority of the people to the government, [01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:32.000] is to supersede the individual rights of the people. [01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:39.000] We cannot give permission to our agents to harm our fellow people [01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:44.000] because we don't have the power to harm our fellow people. [01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:49.000] We cannot give away that which we do not rightfully possess, right? [01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:50.000] Right. [01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:52.000] So if I can't walk up to you personally and say, [01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:57.000] you owe me a tax for your property of X dollars [01:07:57.000 --> 01:08:02.000] because I think it's worth X other dollars, [01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:10.000] then I cannot give that power to my delegated authority agent. [01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:14.000] It should not be a harder concept to understand than that [01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:20.000] because the Texas Constitution does not give a single right to the people. [01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:30.000] Our rights are inherent and existed long before a written constitution of any nation existed. [01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:33.000] Very well. [01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:40.000] So where I need to start looking, which I already have started looking, is the Constitution. [01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:42.000] No. What did I say? [01:08:42.000 --> 01:08:49.000] I said look at the various constitutions in our history for Texas. [01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:58.000] Look at all of them, the 1924 all the way through the 1876. [01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:03.000] You will see through each and every iteration where the Constitution very specifically says [01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:13.000] that no man's property may be taxed without his explicit consent or that of his agent. [01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:18.000] Now when I applied at the tax assessor's office, did I not give them permission? [01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:20.000] For what? [01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:25.000] Well, when we bought our house, we had to file it with the tax assessor's office. [01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:28.000] What did they tell you you had to file it as? [01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:30.000] Real property, right? [01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:31.000] Correct. [01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:32.000] Okay. [01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:38.000] So what does real property mean? [01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:41.000] You don't know, do you? [01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:44.000] I've seen various definitions. [01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:53.000] No, you haven't. You're going to see the one that applies to the law where you live, if you see any. [01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:54.000] Okay? [01:09:54.000 --> 01:09:55.000] Yes, sir. [01:09:55.000 --> 01:10:01.000] You look it up here because here is where the property is and here is where you're being taxed, right? [01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:02.000] Correct. [01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:03.000] Okay. [01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:10.000] Then all the rest of those definitions you're talking about are advisory and referential only for comparison purposes. [01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:14.000] They are not definitive or authoritative. [01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:22.000] However, real property by definition is property used for commercial purposes. [01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:23.000] Bingo. [01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:24.000] Okay? [01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:34.000] And by filling out that form with your tax assessor, that's what you told them you owned, was property for profit, which they can tax. [01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:43.000] What they cannot tax and what they give you no designation to file for is private property, which tells you what? [01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:57.000] If there is no designation by which you can file at the tax assessor's office for private property, then private property is not required to be filed at the tax assessor's office. [01:10:57.000 --> 01:10:59.000] Wouldn't that make sense? [01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:04.000] Yes, and that's why I felt like what I did was a big mistake first. [01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:06.000] Well, you're right about that part. [01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:07.000] Yeah. [01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:10.000] I followed like a lemon and- [01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:12.000] As does everyone else. [01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:15.000] As does everyone else. [01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:18.000] And I'm kicking myself every day for it. [01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:19.000] Okay. [01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:24.000] All you have to do is file a record in the county records changing the status of your property. [01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:25.000] Okay? [01:11:25.000 --> 01:11:48.000] And you take a certified copy of the records you file with the county tax assessor and with the county clerk and make sure they understand that the designation of your property is private, not real property, not agricultural property, which is farm property used for corporate profit and gain. [01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:51.000] Okay? [01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:58.000] Now, understand corporate profit or gain, not private profit or gain. [01:11:58.000 --> 01:12:01.000] You have the right to grow food and sell it to people. [01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:03.000] A corporation does not. [01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:04.000] It has the privilege. [01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:06.000] That privilege is taxable. [01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:11.000] The right is not. [01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:13.000] Excellent. [01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:26.000] Well, you've definitely enlightened me and I have taken notes and now I know what steps to take to prevent the robber barons from- [01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:27.000] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. [01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:35.000] I'm telling you things that are informational and useful, but they are not the whole cantaloupe. [01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:43.000] You go running down there and try to force feed them this without other things to back it up and you're the one that's going to lose. [01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:47.000] Do your research before you do anything else. [01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:49.000] Get your ducks in a row. [01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:52.000] But these are the ducks that I know to get in a row now. [01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:53.000] No. [01:12:53.000 --> 01:12:55.000] These are some of the ducks. [01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:59.000] These are the lead ducks. [01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:02.000] But you know ducks fly in a V, right? [01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:03.000] Yes, sir. [01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:08.000] I've only got the point at the front of the V. [01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:11.000] But at least I know which block to look at now. [01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:15.000] I was lost before and this opens the whole door. [01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:21.000] Now I know which direction to go and what other elements are going to be needed. [01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:22.000] Then good luck. [01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:24.000] So that I go in with the proper- [01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:26.000] Well, don't go in there steamrolling. [01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:31.000] Go in there cautious, careful, and prepared. [01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:33.000] Absolutely. [01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:34.000] Okay. [01:13:34.000 --> 01:13:40.000] Again, your information was greatly appreciated. [01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:42.000] I will open the lines to other people. [01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:48.000] Thank you for your service to our country and have yourself a wonderful evening. [01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:49.000] Yes, sir. [01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:50.000] Thank you. [01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:51.000] Thank you. [01:13:51.000 --> 01:13:52.000] All right. [01:13:52.000 --> 01:13:54.000] Now we're going to go to Olivier. [01:13:54.000 --> 01:13:56.000] Olivier, how you doing? [01:13:56.000 --> 01:13:58.000] How you doing, man? [01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:00.000] I'm doing all right. [01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:02.000] I'm waiting to hear how you are though. [01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:06.000] Man, I'm kind of ecstatic because I checked today. [01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:08.000] I filed three suit. [01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:10.000] The judge dismissed one of the suit. [01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:13.000] Two respond today. [01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:15.000] We got an issue with that and talk to you a second about it. [01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:21.000] But when I called today, I called to see if today was the last day that they had filed an answer. [01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:29.000] And me and my friend was going over the documents and I'm like, man, you can't answer this because this is their law. [01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:35.000] So if they answer any other way, there'll be, you know what I'm saying, misrepresentation of the law. [01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:36.000] Yeah. [01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:41.000] We're sitting here like, we're contemplating like, yo, how are they going to answer this? [01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:42.000] How are they going to answer this? [01:14:42.000 --> 01:14:47.000] So we got this morning called the corrector office to figure out if they found an answer. [01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:49.000] And no answer was found. [01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:53.000] And we called like 20 minutes before they closed again to check. [01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:55.000] They were like, well, no answer was found. [01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:57.000] We don't know if they brought it in the table. [01:14:57.000 --> 01:14:59.000] We'll call tomorrow to figure out. [01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:00.000] Okay. [01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:01.000] Let me ask you this question. [01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:09.000] Did you also think to ask whether or not they had filed a request for extension of time to file an answer? [01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:12.000] They didn't say anything. [01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:13.000] Well, that's just it. [01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:15.000] You didn't ask them either. [01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:16.000] Right. [01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:24.000] Well, the clerks there are real interested in my... [01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:25.000] Well, that may be. [01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:33.000] They may be plenty interested, but that don't mean there ain't somebody standing behind them when you call wanting to make sure they ain't letting no cats out of no bags. [01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:34.000] Okay. [01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:38.000] So if you explicitly ask them the question, they would have to answer it. [01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:43.000] But if you don't and there's somebody listening in, they may avoid answering it. [01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:45.000] You see my point? [01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:46.000] Right. [01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:52.000] So it's better that you don't take the chance to say, okay, well, if they didn't file an answer, did they file a request for an extension of time? [01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:54.000] No, they didn't file that either. [01:15:54.000 --> 01:15:55.000] All right. [01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:57.000] That's all I needed to know. [01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:01.000] Wouldn't I have to receive that request for an extension? [01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:03.000] Well, again, it depends on when they filed it. [01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:08.000] If they filed it five minutes before closing time, like you said, then you wouldn't have gotten that notice yet, would you? [01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:11.000] But they would have had it filed timely, wouldn't they? [01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:13.000] Right. [01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:14.000] So you see? [01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:15.000] I'm going to call tomorrow. [01:16:15.000 --> 01:16:17.000] I'm going to call tomorrow, but... [01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:20.000] Yeah, but be sure and ask about both of those. [01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:21.000] Okay. [01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:29.000] And another issue we have to debate is one of my friends is, again, I'm seeing the progress that I've been doing with the police. [01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:32.000] He's been doing the same actions, too. [01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:33.000] So we're in court today. [01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:35.000] I'm in court supporting him. [01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:42.000] And the judge is finding people indigent and then turning around to call charges of eternity. [01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:43.000] He also said it to my friend. [01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:45.000] He also said it to me. [01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:51.000] So now we're trying to figure out the best way to make him pay for that. [01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000] Judicial conduct complains first. [01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:57.000] And if there's something that says he can't do it, a lawsuit for that for acting nonjudicially. [01:16:57.000 --> 01:16:58.000] We'll be right back. [01:16:58.000 --> 01:17:00.000] Y'all hang in there. [01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:09.000] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. [01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:14.000] We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals. [01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:18.000] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. [01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:24.000] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists. [01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. [01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.000] In addition, we carry popular longevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polynbers. [01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:39.000] We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more. [01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000] We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment. [01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:46.000] Call us at 512-646-6440. [01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:51.000] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. [01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. [01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:00.000] Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440. [01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:06.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:11.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:25.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:31.000] Logos Serial Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:40.000] We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:48.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:52.000] As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:59.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000] Order now. [01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000] This is the Logos Logos Radio Network. [01:19:32.000 --> 01:19:35.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:37.000] Let's see if we can make a dent in this color board. [01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:40.000] All right, Olivier, go ahead. [01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:41.000] All right. [01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:42.000] Yeah. [01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:52.000] I found the state indigency statute, and nowhere in there says that the defendant is charged anything. [01:19:52.000 --> 01:20:08.000] Actually, they actually make an account or like some type of program or some vehicle for the attorneys to file after they have finished with the defendant. [01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:14.000] Okay, then here's what I would do in this particular case. [01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:25.000] If there is no specific statutory authority for this judge to do what he's doing or no judicial discretion allowed for him to do what he's doing for an indigent defendant, [01:20:25.000 --> 01:20:33.000] I would make the allegation that this judge is in cahoots with the attorneys to double dip. [01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:52.000] He's making the indigent person pay the attorney while the attorney is also able to file into this fund, claiming he didn't get full restitution for his services from the indigent defendant. [01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:58.000] So do I, I don't know if to see that he's charging and going to the court or is it going to the attorney? [01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:03.000] Well, it's just it. It doesn't have to be going to the court for him to be in cahoots with the attorneys to make that happen. [01:21:03.000 --> 01:21:08.000] He can get his cut under the table. [01:21:08.000 --> 01:21:12.000] So it doesn't matter who he's going to. It just matters that it happened. [01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:16.000] Yeah. [01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:17.000] Okay. [01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:21.000] I would file a judicial conduct complaint asserting that this appears to be the case. [01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:30.000] And the thing here is, is that I would also do an open records request to see whether or not the attorneys. [01:21:30.000 --> 01:21:31.000] I did that. [01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:32.000] Okay. [01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:33.000] No, I didn't do that. No, I didn't do that. [01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:37.000] Okay. Listen carefully and let's make sure that you did or didn't do what I'm about to say. [01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:48.000] An open records request demanding all records showing what attorneys collected fees from what clients in what cases. [01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:59.000] And then see if those cases also contain orders by that judge to pay those attorney's fees from the indigent individual. [01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:01.000] Okay. [01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:02.000] Okay. [01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:09.000] And then what we can do is we can say, okay, this attorney filed into the program over here and got paid 350 bucks. [01:22:09.000 --> 01:22:15.000] But right here in the same case, they've got an order from this judge for 350 bucks. [01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:18.000] They're double dipping. [01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:19.000] Okay. [01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:28.000] Unless the statute says the judge assesses the bill for the attorney's fees to the indigent individual, [01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:34.000] but the order is only used by the attorney to collect from the program. [01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:36.000] That would be okay. [01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:42.000] But if that ain't the case, they're double dipping or at least trying to. [01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:44.000] Right. [01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:52.000] What I did was I filed a judicial, I mean, I filed an information request for the cases for this judge, [01:22:52.000 --> 01:23:02.000] just this judge in the last two years because me and my friend sat there and saw him did it to about 10 people within two hours. [01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:08.000] So we're like, man, they're saying he must have been doing this since he was in this chair. [01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:22.000] So we did it from two years back from today's date of everyone that he granted indigency to, then assessed charges also. [01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:26.000] So we filed that and I'm waiting back for that. [01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:28.000] But I do understand what you're saying. [01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:40.000] I figured out on the flip side, go check out to see what transactions the attorneys have been making so I could make an inclusive argument of what's happening. [01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:41.000] Correct. [01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:44.000] And that the judge is in on it. [01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:46.000] Well, he's got to be in on it. [01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:48.000] And then you should have heard how. [01:23:48.000 --> 01:23:53.000] Well, yeah, the attorney can't assess the fees against an indigent client without him. [01:23:53.000 --> 01:23:58.000] I really felt like going up there and heard him, he was talking to people like any type of way. [01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:02.000] Like, oh, you made a cash bond and you can't go get an attorney. [01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:03.000] What do you mean? [01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:04.000] Somebody paid to get him out of jail. [01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:05.000] Who wants him to sit in jail? [01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:06.000] What do you mean? [01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:07.000] Are you crazy? [01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:08.000] Are you nuts? [01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:10.000] Are you yelling at the individuals? [01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:12.000] Are you yelling at them? [01:24:12.000 --> 01:24:18.000] Because they didn't have enough money to come pay for an attorney after they paid $5,000 to get out of jail? [01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:19.000] Yeah, exactly. [01:24:19.000 --> 01:24:21.000] Are you serious? [01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:23.000] I'm like, man, I'm going to nail you. [01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:24.000] That's why I'm thinking the whole time. [01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:25.000] I'm going to nail you so hard. [01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:27.000] Thank you for reading the statute. [01:24:27.000 --> 01:24:29.000] Well, not knowing the statute. [01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:30.000] I don't know what they're doing. [01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:36.000] But I wanted to read you what the judge wrote that dismissed one of my lawsuits. [01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:40.000] I guess they couldn't find any way to dismiss the other one. [01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:41.000] So they took a shot at this one. [01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:42.000] OK. [01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:43.000] Really stumbled. [01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:44.000] Well, OK. [01:24:44.000 --> 01:24:47.000] It says, come now, city of Foxville, Tennessee. [01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:51.000] And threw like, oh, this is the wrong paper. [01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:56.000] Oh, it's the wrong paper. [01:24:56.000 --> 01:24:57.000] I don't have it. [01:24:57.000 --> 01:24:58.000] We're going to have to read it to you next time. [01:24:58.000 --> 01:25:04.000] All right. [01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:05.000] One sec. [01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:11.000] I have that. [01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:12.000] All right. [01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:16.000] So now, if they don't answer by tomorrow, that's a done deal? [01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:17.000] Because I haven't. [01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:22.000] Well, you can file for a default judgment. [01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:23.000] OK. [01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:25.000] There's the city. [01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:28.000] Then there's also the towing company. [01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:32.000] I've gotten the attorney who was assigned to the city. [01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:36.000] I've never got anything from the towing company. [01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:39.000] And today was the last day. [01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:41.000] Well, he can't represent the tow company. [01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:44.000] If the tow company's doing nothing, they're in default. [01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:47.000] You could probably get a judgment directly against them. [01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:57.000] But the municipality, they're always going to try to find some way to save the municipality having to pay the money, even if they default. [01:25:57.000 --> 01:26:01.000] Even if they default? [01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:02.000] Yeah. [01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:11.000] They'll give them an extension of time after the fact or whatever to allow them to bail, so to speak. [01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:13.000] To bail, pay out or? [01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:14.000] No, no, no. [01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:17.000] Bail in the suit, to bail them out. [01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:18.000] OK. [01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:23.000] They'll give the city an extension of time to file an answer or whatever. [01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:26.000] And then they'll go, oh, OK, well, good. [01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:27.000] That's a good answer. [01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:28.000] We'll go ahead and take you out of the suit. [01:26:28.000 --> 01:26:35.000] It will give you immunity and let you out. [01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:36.000] OK. [01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:37.000] Yeah. [01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:41.000] Don't ever put that past them, because that's exactly the kind of crap they pull. [01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:42.000] OK. [01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:56.000] I filed the, there's a rule 60D where it says that when the judge, to a sponsor, a pro-state plaintiff, without cause, that you could file a suit. [01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:58.000] And I filed that in the document. [01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:00.000] I haven't made a move on that yet. [01:27:00.000 --> 01:27:08.000] But I did, I do know that they, he noticed that I filed other information about what I'm going to do. [01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:16.000] So you think he was still trying to press that issue, knowing that I know how to press charges? [01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:18.000] Hard to say. [01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:27.000] He may think that he's going to be the one to get you. [01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:34.000] And even though he doesn't have any grounds, they're too arrogant to think that you have any way to get them, but they can always get you. [01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:37.000] And they can take their time and do it however they like. [01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:45.000] So as long as you're aware of that and you stay diligent, you can make it very difficult on them when they try that. [01:27:45.000 --> 01:27:48.000] OK. [01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:50.000] All right. [01:27:50.000 --> 01:28:03.000] I think, oh, the only thing else I did was, since I filed the suit, and someone was shopping in the store and met one of the COAS departments. [01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:09.000] And they, I guess, one of them, they talked to them and asked them what was the situation that was going on with me. [01:28:09.000 --> 01:28:23.000] And they said, apparently, what they told them was that I was going to end up being paid because they come to find out that everything that they've been doing was wrong. [01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:24.000] Yeah. [01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:30.000] So that was kind of, I'm like, well, I wonder what's going on because I guess he talked to one of the workers. [01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:33.000] A lot of things are changing in the office area. [01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:34.000] Yeah. [01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:35.000] That's the thing about it. [01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:39.000] I love looking at people that behave that way and say, you know what? [01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:46.000] Your stupidity is not my problem. [01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:48.000] Good. [01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:51.000] And that's just the way it is. [01:28:51.000 --> 01:29:00.000] Well, what I did was when I was like, well, since I'm on the ball, what I did was I called them up and I told them, like, hey, this is Martian Living. [01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:02.000] I have a problem. [01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:10.000] I've seen y'all in our neighborhood still, and that means you're forcing your employees to come to our neighborhood and violate our rights. [01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:13.000] I said, we don't have any slaves here. [01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:16.000] I said, my service is not slave. [01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:25.000] I said, if my service continues coming out of property and violating, I'm going to turn you in on a RICO suit. [01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:28.000] And they were like, what's that, Mr. Olivier? [01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:32.000] I'm like, well, RICO is where I accuse you of being a criminal organization. [01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:35.000] I already have your suit on my house, which I informed you of everything. [01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:37.000] Now you're continuing to do it. [01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:39.000] Now I'm going to come and file a RICO. [01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:41.000] I'm like, yes, Mr. Olivier. [01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:44.000] I'll make sure that they know this and we're going to take care of it. [01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:46.000] Well, good for you, man. [01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:47.000] All right. [01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:48.000] Anything else? [01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:49.000] No, no, no. [01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:50.000] All right. [01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:53.000] Well, you take care and I'll talk to you next week when you find your paper. [01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:54.000] All right, folks. [01:29:54.000 --> 01:30:02.000] We'll be right back after this break. [01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:08.000] Yowza, getting burned is a painful experience, and the aftermath can include blistering and an ugly scar. [01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:12.000] An unconventional home remedy could deliver welcome relief. [01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:17.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you why some burn victims are turning to the pantry. [01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:19.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:23.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:28.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:29.000] So protect your rights. [01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:33.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:39.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:43.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:46.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:50.000] My friend Liz burned her arm in a cast iron pan the other day. [01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:51.000] Ouch. [01:30:51.000 --> 01:30:54.000] She ran cold water over the burn, but the pain remained. [01:30:54.000 --> 01:30:56.000] Plus, she was concerned about blisters. [01:30:56.000 --> 01:30:58.000] So she turned to the Internet for advice. [01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:04.000] There she stumbled on a seemingly crazy home remedy suggested by the People's Pharmacy, cold yellow mustard. [01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:08.000] She applied mustard to the burn, and the pain stopped right away. [01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:13.000] Then she bandaged the area, and the next day she was pain-free with no blisters. [01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:16.000] Serious burns require a trip to the doctor or the hospital. [01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:20.000] But for minor burns, you might want to give common yellow mustard a try. [01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:22.000] It seems to work. [01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:23.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:31.000] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:48.000] Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:50.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:57.000] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:07.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:32.000] We trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:45.000] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000] So if those out of town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:03.000] May not actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:12.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:30.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:33:30.000 --> 01:33:35.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, caller number 512-646-1984. [01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:37.000] Got a half an hour to go and a full call to board. [01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:39.000] Let's see if I can make this work. [01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:41.000] All right, Adam in Texas, what can I do for you? [01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:49.000] Hello, Adam. [01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:50.000] Hey. [01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:51.000] Hello. [01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:53.000] Yeah, well, you blocked out for a minute. [01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:54.000] I guess it's my phone. [01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:55.000] Can you hear me? [01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:56.000] I hear you. [01:33:56.000 --> 01:33:58.000] And everybody else, too. [01:33:58.000 --> 01:33:59.000] What can I do for you? [01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:01.000] Yeah, what I let slip this time. [01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:02.000] Do you hear any names? [01:34:02.000 --> 01:34:04.000] No. [01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:05.000] Okay. [01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:15.000] Well, I went ahead and did what you said, and I went into the JP's office in an attempt [01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:22.000] to file my motion to suppress evidence, all legit. [01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:26.000] My motion to dismiss my order for dismissal. [01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:32.000] And the judge comes out, and he was very all right. [01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:34.000] All right. [01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:35.000] How? [01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:37.000] He refused to take my motions. [01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:44.000] He said he told me that he couldn't dismiss anything and only upon recommendation of the [01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:46.000] prosecution to do anything. [01:34:46.000 --> 01:34:47.000] His hands were tied. [01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:52.000] And no, he would not accept my motions and basically get out of my office. [01:34:52.000 --> 01:34:54.000] Oh, goody. [01:34:54.000 --> 01:34:59.000] Your next motion to file is a disqualification of the judge with a judicial conduct complaint [01:34:59.000 --> 01:35:01.000] against it. [01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:02.000] Yes, sir. [01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:03.000] I was hoping you'd say that. [01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:08.000] No, the only thing I called is I was going to ask how exactly how to phrase. [01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:16.000] You are going to state in the judicial conduct complaint, bias, prejudice, refusal to allow [01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:23.000] your common law right to have access to the courts, to have your challenges heard and [01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:25.000] your grievances heard. [01:35:25.000 --> 01:35:30.000] He can't prevent you from filing pleadings in your own case. [01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:31.000] Right. [01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:33.000] I know, I knew that. [01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:35.000] It was very crazy. [01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:42.000] So judicial conduct complaints and file a motion to disqualify, you can mail it to the [01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:48.000] court certified mail return receipt requested and mail another copy certified mail return [01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:55.000] receipt requested to the head administrative judge of your district. [01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:58.000] Head administrative judge of my district. [01:35:58.000 --> 01:35:59.000] Yeah. [01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:02.000] So those are the only two places to file the. [01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:07.000] Now listen carefully, not to a district judge. [01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:09.000] That is not what I'm saying to do. [01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:13.000] Do not send this to a district judge. [01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:23.000] Send this to the head administrative judge that it presides over your district. [01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:25.000] Gotcha. [01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:31.000] You can call any courthouse and ask who that is and how to send paperwork to them. [01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:32.000] Yes, sir. [01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:35.000] Head administrative judge. [01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:39.000] Is that the only two places I would be filing my judicial conduct complaint? [01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:43.000] No, the judicial conduct complaint goes to the judicial conduct commission. [01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:44.000] Gotcha. [01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:50.000] The motion to disqualify is what goes to that court and to the head administrative judge. [01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:56.000] And you can attach copies of your judicial conduct complaint to those motions. [01:36:56.000 --> 01:36:58.000] Gotcha. [01:36:58.000 --> 01:36:59.000] Gotcha. [01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:00.000] Okay. [01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:05.000] Well, let me tell you what was interesting is I'm sitting in there. [01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:07.000] This is what I figured out happened. [01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:14.000] Sitting in there as the judge, as I have my back turned to his clerk. [01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:18.000] He's sitting there just, you know, I mean, he's very upset. [01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:20.000] I'm coming in and daring to file. [01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:22.000] This is a JP or municipal? [01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:24.000] It was a JP. [01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:26.000] Okay. [01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:31.000] So he's sitting there telling me how he's not going to take them and all this stuff. [01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:34.000] And he says, I can't do anything without the prosecution. [01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:36.000] You need to go talk to the prosecution. [01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:41.000] I was just sitting there just dumbfounded like I just couldn't believe what I was hearing. [01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:43.000] What do you mean I can't file my motions? [01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:48.000] And he was just, he was out of it, you know, get your butt out of my office. [01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:49.000] So I leave the office. [01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:53.000] I grab my paperwork and I go to the prosecutor. [01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:58.000] And I'm talking to the prosecutor and he's like, you know, I'll tell him everything that just happened. [01:37:58.000 --> 01:37:59.000] He's like, well, hold on a second. [01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:01.000] He calls down to JP's office. [01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:04.000] He's like, oh, and they have like some, it was funny. [01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:07.000] They had like, I don't know, seem to me like some little code talk. [01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:10.000] Like all of a sudden they're talking about they're going to go fishing together. [01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:11.000] And I don't know. [01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:12.000] It was weird. [01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:21.000] It was kind of strange like, like the prosecutor was trying to, you know, tell the JP something without me knowing. [01:38:21.000 --> 01:38:24.000] Anyway, I think he was just trying to tell him code for calm down. [01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:27.000] Everything's going to be okay. [01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:33.000] But anyway, lo and behold, the prosecutor said, well, let's, you know, I'm having facts over everything to file. [01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:40.000] Lo and behold, there were a copy of the motions that I was just denied to file by the judge. [01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:48.000] What happened was the JP clerk, who's probably the only competent person in the office, realized what was going on. [01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:49.000] She's like, fuck it. [01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:50.000] You know, I'm sorry. [01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:52.000] I'm not going to lose my job over this. [01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:53.000] You know, I'm going to file these. [01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:54.000] So I had my back was turned. [01:38:54.000 --> 01:38:59.000] She grabbed them and copied them as the judge was telling me how I couldn't file them. [01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:01.000] And then lo and behold, they were there. [01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:03.000] So now they are in the record. [01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:05.000] Here's the problem. [01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:07.000] This is exactly why I tell you. [01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:15.000] Doesn't matter whether or not they're attorneys specifically when they occupy these positions, but even those that are. [01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:24.000] This is Article 32.02 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which this judge should know about and have read. [01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:27.000] Dismissal by state's attorney. [01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:48.000] The attorney representing the state may, by permission of the court, dismiss a criminal action at any time upon filing a written statement with the papers in the case, setting out his reasons for such dismissal, which shall be incorporated in the judgment of dismissal. [01:39:48.000 --> 01:39:55.000] No case shall be dismissed without the consent of the presiding judge. [01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:01.000] He has it completely frickin backwards, of course. [01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:02.000] Okay. [01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:06.000] So he abdicated his rightful authority over to the. [01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:19.000] That's what he's trying to do, which makes him judicially incompetent and needs to be something stated in your motion to dismiss and a second judicial conduct complaint. [01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:22.000] Okay. [01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:24.000] Think real quick. [01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:29.000] Yeah, anyway, it was my first time to really go in there and fight like an American. [01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:33.000] And it's pretty fun, but it is stressful, you know. [01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:38.000] I don't have all the time in the world. It takes a lot of time to get the paperwork going and do all this stuff. [01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:43.000] Yeah, well, tell me about it. I had to write over 400 of them to help you guys out. [01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:44.000] Yeah. [01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:49.000] Kudos to you, Eddie, but everybody out there, man, you know, this has been a fight you just go pick. [01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:50.000] He's not lying. [01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:54.000] This is, you know, it can consume you. [01:40:54.000 --> 01:40:56.000] I mean, it's it's they will not let you go. [01:40:56.000 --> 01:40:59.000] They just they're just trying to wear you down, which you got to get in there. [01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:07.000] Yeah, but the thing is, it only is it only wears you down and acts like work when you're not trying to enjoy yourself. [01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:10.000] I try to enjoy myself. [01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:11.000] I'm sorry, Judge. [01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:12.000] What did you say? [01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:16.000] Could you repeat that one more time into the little pin in my pocket? [01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:17.000] Thank you. [01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:22.000] I'll be right back with your disqualification papers. [01:41:22.000 --> 01:41:27.000] I know, but most of us, I mean, you know, most of us have to work for a living. [01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:30.000] And this is I mean, they do take a big old bite out of your time. [01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:33.000] I'm not really sure whether to resent that or like it. [01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:36.000] Most of us have to work for a living. What the hell is that? [01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:42.000] You call digging you guys out of the holes you put yourselves in not work? [01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:43.000] That's true. [01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:46.000] You know, it is work. It is work. [01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:48.000] Well, I don't want to take all our time. [01:41:48.000 --> 01:41:52.000] You pretty much summed up all of my questions. [01:41:52.000 --> 01:41:54.000] So go get them. [01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:55.000] Thanks, Eddie. [01:41:55.000 --> 01:41:56.000] You're welcome. [01:41:56.000 --> 01:41:57.000] Bye. [01:41:57.000 --> 01:41:59.000] All right. Now we have Ralph in Texas. [01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:02.000] Ralph, what can we do for you? [01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:06.000] Eddie, I called you to talk about the hierarchy of law. [01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:07.000] Okay. [01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:16.000] The administrative code rule 1.2 does not take precedent over all transportation defenses. [01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:19.000] Well, because it's not, it's relative. [01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:23.000] When you say rule 1.2, you're talking under Title 37 for the Department of Public Safety, correct? [01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:28.000] And it's rule 1.12, is it not? [01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:29.000] Well, I'm looking at it. [01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:31.000] This says rule 1.2. [01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:32.000] Okay. [01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:36.000] And that's the rule dealing with their mission statement, right? [01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:37.000] Correct. [01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:38.000] Okay. [01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:39.000] It is. [01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:45.000] It does take precedent over what the authority of the DPS is in relation to the transportation code. [01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:48.000] It's not authority over the transportation code. [01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:53.000] It's authority over the DPS's ability to use the transportation code. [01:42:53.000 --> 01:43:01.000] So if you're stopped by the DPS and you're stopped on a rural highway, just like it says in the mission statement, [01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:10.000] and you're not in commerce or for hire and you tell the officer that at the time, how in the heck can it go past that? [01:43:10.000 --> 01:43:11.000] Well, that's just the point. [01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:17.000] That's the whole presentation I did at the beginning of this show tonight is all about that. [01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:20.000] There are two primary conditions under that rule. [01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:26.000] The first one is supervise traffic on rural highways. [01:43:26.000 --> 01:43:30.000] Supervise simply means direct traffic. [01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:32.000] I need to take this detour. [01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:33.000] The bridge is out. [01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:34.000] There's an accident ahead. [01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:35.000] Go this way. [01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:36.000] Go that way. [01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:37.000] I got a road jam up there. [01:43:37.000 --> 01:43:40.000] Y'all slow down and hold on while we get this cleared up. [01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:42.000] That's supervising. [01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:48.000] The other one is to supervise and regulate commercial and for hire traffic, [01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:50.000] which I'll get into on the other side of this break. [01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:52.000] So hang on, Ralph. [01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:53.000] All right, folks. [01:43:53.000 --> 01:43:54.000] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:43:54.000 --> 01:44:13.000] We'll be right back after the break for the last segment [01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:25.000] of the show. [01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:58.000] We'll be right back. [01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:13.000] We'll be right back. [01:45:13.000 --> 01:45:28.000] We'll be right back. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:43.000] We'll be right back. [01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:58.000] We'll be right back. [01:45:58.000 --> 01:46:26.000] We'll be right back. [01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:28.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:46:28.000 --> 01:46:31.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking to Ralph in Texas. [01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:33.000] We are in the last segment of the show. [01:46:33.000 --> 01:46:35.000] So let's see if we can get through this caller board. [01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:37.000] All right, Ralph, go ahead. [01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:39.000] Okay, I'll try to make this quick. [01:46:39.000 --> 01:46:42.000] Yes, your monologue was not lost on me. [01:46:42.000 --> 01:46:46.000] That's something I was already doing along those lines, working out in my head, [01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:48.000] but I did get some great words from you. [01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:53.000] So what I'm going to do is I'm going to answer the defendant's motion to dismiss with, [01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:59.000] assuming that I was in transportation and given up 62 cases that they want me to [01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:05.000] argue, which says that if I'm in transportation, then I have no right to sue the [01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:08.000] law officer for unlawful arrest. [01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:12.000] So I'm going to go in with the, they are presuming I was in transportation, [01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:13.000] and I hope... [01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:15.000] Well, here's the thing. [01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:18.000] In this particular case, if you're going to the administrative code, [01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:20.000] and that's something I still haven't integrated into this yet, [01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:25.000] which I'm going to, going through those rules in the administrative code, [01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:30.000] I am not subject to the regulatory programs of the Department of Public Safety [01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:35.000] Pursuant Rule 1.2 of the Texas Administrative Code under Title 37. [01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:38.000] And you'll get the whole spiel of where it is within there, of course. [01:47:38.000 --> 01:47:46.000] But as I am not one engaging in transportation or subject to transportation as someone [01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:53.000] who is regulated upon the highways as commercial or for hire traffic, [01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:57.000] the enforcement provisions of the code under the authority of the DPS [01:47:57.000 --> 01:48:02.000] do not apply to me. [01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:07.000] Yes, and then add something to the effect of, for the defendant to presume that, [01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:15.000] to presume facts, instead of using case law to dismiss the thing, there's facts. [01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:16.000] They can't dismiss... [01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:19.000] No, it's not called a presumption of facts. [01:48:19.000 --> 01:48:28.000] It's called an unrebuttable legal presumption with no substantive evidence in support. [01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:34.000] An unrebuttable legal presumption with no substantive evidence, [01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:37.000] facts or evidence in support, okay? [01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:40.000] But it is rebuttable if they're using it in a simple... [01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:47.000] It's not rebuttable in the case of being charged with it because they never allow you to rebut it. [01:48:47.000 --> 01:48:49.000] That's why it's unrebuttable. [01:48:49.000 --> 01:48:53.000] You tell the officer on the side of the road, I'm not engaged in transportation. [01:48:53.000 --> 01:48:54.000] I don't care. [01:48:54.000 --> 01:49:01.000] He's assuming that his position is unrebuttable, that his allegation and presumption is unrebuttable, [01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:06.000] that unrebuttable presumption created by the officer then proceeds into court [01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:10.000] where the prosecutor and the judge do exactly the same thing. [01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:12.000] I wasn't engaged in transportation, Judge. [01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:13.000] I don't care. [01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:14.000] I've got jurisdiction. [01:49:14.000 --> 01:49:16.000] We're going to trial. [01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:24.000] Every one of them are doing exactly the same thing, failing to apply the law to the facts [01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:33.000] and recognize the lack of jurisdiction due to the lack of the primary element of the allegation. [01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:37.000] Now, that sounds like something I can use against their motion to dismiss. [01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:40.000] Absolutely. [01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:42.000] I'm going to work on it. [01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:43.000] Eddie, appreciate it. [01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:44.000] I'm going to let you get the other callers. [01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:45.000] All right. [01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:46.000] Thanks for calling in, Ralph. [01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:47.000] Thank you. [01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:48.000] Bye. [01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:49.000] Bye-bye. [01:49:49.000 --> 01:49:50.000] All right. [01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:53.000] This is Yang Van. [01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:57.000] Hello? [01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:01.000] Hello, Yang. [01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:05.000] Yeah, this is Stephen, California, actually. [01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:06.000] Oh, okay. [01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:07.000] Yeah. [01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:16.000] And back in June, we spoke about my vacation to Florida where I was charged with domestic [01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:19.000] violence, failure to give ID, and assaults on officers. [01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:22.000] While walking down the street, right? [01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:23.000] Mm-hmm. [01:50:23.000 --> 01:50:24.000] Okay. [01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:34.000] So my question for you tonight is about the case law that I could study to know what this [01:50:34.000 --> 01:50:38.000] circuit court faces his rulings on. [01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:42.000] My understanding is that it's Florida appeals decisions. [01:50:42.000 --> 01:50:45.000] And what source do I go to to find... [01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:46.000] Anything above... [01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:47.000] ...decisions. [01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:52.000] Anything in a court of record with appellate power, anything that can set precedent, which [01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:56.000] would usually be the courts of appeals and the Supreme Court of the state? [01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:00.000] So Supreme Court of the state and appeal. [01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:01.000] Okay. [01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:02.000] No. [01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:04.000] The hierarchy is the Supreme Court is the top court. [01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:09.000] Between the Supreme Court and the other courts is the appellate courts. [01:51:09.000 --> 01:51:12.000] Below the appellate courts, at least for Texas, we call them district courts. [01:51:12.000 --> 01:51:15.000] They're called different things everywhere else. [01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:17.000] But here, they're district courts. [01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:25.000] The district courts and below cannot set precedent, though God knows why, considering that you're [01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:29.000] supposed to be entitled to due process at every level of every proceeding. [01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:33.000] You don't really get due process of any kind until you wind up in the appellate courts [01:51:33.000 --> 01:51:38.000] and the Supreme Court. [01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:44.000] Everybody at the trial level just does whatever the hell they want. [01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:46.000] Okay. [01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:53.000] Well, now there were witnesses, but the state hasn't put those into discovery. [01:51:53.000 --> 01:51:57.000] The only person in discovery is my wife and the officer. [01:51:57.000 --> 01:52:02.000] Well, what witnesses does the state plan on using? [01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:06.000] They advise us so far that it's the officer and my wife. [01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:07.000] Okay. [01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:13.000] When you asked for the witnesses in discovery, how did you do that? [01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:22.000] Did you not file a separate motion for disclosure of the witnesses that the prosecution intended to call? [01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:25.000] I don't have our motion to discover. [01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:29.000] I only have their exhibit, the prosecutor's exhibit. [01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:30.000] Okay. [01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:31.000] That isn't my question. [01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:32.000] Okay. [01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:35.000] You said in discovery, this is what they gave you. [01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:42.000] Well, if that's the case, you would have had to have asked for discovery, right? [01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:45.000] They don't do discovery of their own to give you stuff. [01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:51.000] They do it to get stuff from you. [01:52:51.000 --> 01:53:02.000] My understanding is that they do discovery and then my attorney has 15 days to file his discovery after that. [01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:05.000] They file their discovery first. [01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:06.000] Okay. [01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:09.000] As I said, someone has to file a request for discovery. [01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:12.000] Sounds like your attorney did that. [01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:15.000] And if he hasn't, why isn't he? [01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:24.000] But the question remains, why haven't they filed, unless they did and you just think it's all in one thing rather than the separate one that it normally is, [01:53:24.000 --> 01:53:31.000] a separate motion demanding a list of the witnesses the other side intends to call. [01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:33.000] Okay. [01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:34.000] All right. [01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:37.000] I think we haven't gotten to that stage yet. [01:53:37.000 --> 01:53:39.000] That's what's going on now. [01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:40.000] Okay. [01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:43.000] So what's your question then? [01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:45.000] I emailed you this week. [01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:49.000] My question there was about other witnesses. [01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:52.000] There are other witnesses mentioned in the report. [01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:58.000] So I'm wondering if there be advantageous for me to get those other witnesses. [01:53:58.000 --> 01:54:03.000] Well, do you know what those other witnesses are going to say? [01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:04.000] No, I don't. [01:54:04.000 --> 01:54:09.000] Then are you somebody going to depose them and ask? [01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:12.000] That's what I assume we would do with that. [01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:14.000] Well, don't ever assume. [01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:16.000] You know what assume does, right? [01:54:16.000 --> 01:54:17.000] Yeah. [01:54:17.000 --> 01:54:18.000] Okay. [01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:22.000] Don't do that, especially when you're letting an attorney do the job. [01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:31.000] You will assume yourself right into a prison cell or bankruptcy. [01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:32.000] Okay. [01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:38.000] This is actually the nosy lady, the lady that kind of started all this, the witness. [01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:42.000] If you want to know what's going on, make your attorney tell you. [01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:43.000] He works for you. [01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:46.000] You don't work for him. [01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:49.000] All right. [01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:50.000] Okay. [01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:57.000] He can certainly tell you a lot better than I can what he's done. [01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:05.000] Yeah, it boils down to the thing about did they have reasonable suspicion to stop me in the first place on the charges they dropped? [01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:09.000] I still don't quite understand how the two are related. [01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:12.000] The charges that came later, the assault, that wouldn't have happened, [01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:19.000] and they wouldn't have been able to trump and lie about those had I not been pulled over for bogus allegations. [01:55:19.000 --> 01:55:25.000] Well, the thing is, is you have a right to resist an unlawful arrest no matter what they try to tell you. [01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:29.000] The Supreme Court has ruled twice that we do. [01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:30.000] Okay. [01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:38.000] When they physically assault you, police officer or not, if they have no lawful authority to do what they're doing, [01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:50.000] they are a criminal trespasser just as much as any other mask-wearing thug on the street. [01:55:50.000 --> 01:55:51.000] Okay. [01:55:51.000 --> 01:56:01.000] Eddie, the reason I'm thinking about that lady, the nosy lady as being a witness, is that this is an anonymous tip as far as I know. [01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:02.000] Okay. [01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:03.000] That doesn't help. [01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:08.000] If it's an anonymous tip, you don't know who tipped them by default, right? [01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:11.000] You're only assuming. [01:56:11.000 --> 01:56:14.000] Stop doing that. [01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:19.000] Okay. [01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:23.000] I feel like I'm going in there naked if it's just the officer versus my word. [01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:25.000] I don't know if that's better or having wisdom. [01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:26.000] Why just your word? [01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:27.000] Your wife was present. [01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:29.000] One of the passerbys were on the street. [01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:32.000] Does anybody know? [01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:37.000] Well, the thing about it is when they mention passersby, numerous and several complaints, blah, blah, blah, [01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:40.000] I think they're only talking about one person but attributing. [01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:47.000] Well, again, they're asserting something they would have to prove up if they asserted as a fact at trial. [01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:49.000] They would have to prove they got several. [01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:59.000] The only way they could do that and which your attorney should know is through the call-ins to 911 or to police dispatch, [01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:03.000] all of which would have been recorded and they would have. [01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:12.000] And he should subpoena or move to discover or get copies of in whatever way he can so you can tell if they're lying or not [01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:17.000] and thus impeach their testimony when they say, well, we got six or seven. [01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:25.000] And then your attorney goes, well, I've got all of the tapes for the calls here and I can only find one that says it was related to this matter. [01:57:25.000 --> 01:57:28.000] So were you lying when you said six or seven? [01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:34.000] Are you lying when you're going to say, oh, wait, I remember now it's just one. [01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:36.000] Okay. [01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:38.000] Okay. [01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:40.000] And if that one's anonymous, that's the thing. [01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:41.000] That's what I'm saying. [01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:44.000] If it's anonymous, it's not going to make any difference. [01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:47.000] The only thing that will apply was whatever's in that recording. [01:57:47.000 --> 01:57:53.000] And then the officer is going to have to show how they identified those facts with what they saw on scene, [01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:58.000] which you and your wife can refute because you were both there. [01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:00.000] Right? [01:58:00.000 --> 01:58:01.000] Yeah, that's right. [01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:02.000] Okay. [01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:04.000] Well, thank you very much for your time. [01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:05.000] Thanks for taking my call. [01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:05.000] All right. [01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:06.000] No problem. [01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:07.000] Appreciate it. [01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:07.000] All right. [01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:08.000] Charles, Robert. [01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:09.000] Yeah, you're good, Steve. [01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:12.000] I'm sorry I wasn't able to get to you before I ran out of time, guys. [01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:15.000] Just the nature of the beast as it is here. [01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:18.000] I hope you all are able to email me and I can see it. [01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:24.000] But remember, I'm working on a case and I'm going to head down until after the 24th for the filing deadline, [01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:29.000] possibly even if they extend it to the 8th, I think, or the 6th of next month. [01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:34.000] But I've got to get this stuff done so I'm not paying a lot of attention to email stuff right now. [01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:35.000] I can't. [01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:40.000] But please hang in there and try to do your best without me until I'm able to get back in the swim. [01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:41.000] All right, folks. [01:58:41.000 --> 01:58:42.000] You all have a great week. [01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:43.000] Thanks for listening. [01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:44.000] Thanks for your support. [01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:50.000] Good night and God bless. [01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:57.000] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:57.000 --> 01:59:03.000] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, [01:59:03.000 --> 01:59:08.000] verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:26.000] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000] plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:41.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:51.000 --> 01:59:53.000] Looking for some truth? [01:59:53.000 --> 01:59:54.000] You found it. [01:59:54.000 --> 02:00:02.000] Logosradionetwork.com