[00:00.000 --> 00:07.760]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing you jelly
[00:07.760 --> 00:15.440]  bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:15.440 --> 00:23.280]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.280 --> 00:29.800]  Markets for Monday, the 22nd of August, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,336.63
[00:29.800 --> 00:36.760]  an ounce, silver $18.86 an ounce, Texas crude $47.05 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:36.760 --> 00:41.800]  sitting at about $585 U.S. currency.
[00:41.800 --> 00:50.920]  Today in history, the year 1902, the Cadillac Motor Company is founded, and in the same
[00:50.920 --> 00:54.880]  year President Theodore Roosevelt becomes the first president of the United States to
[00:54.880 --> 01:01.840]  ride in an automobile, though it wasn't a Cadillac.
[01:01.840 --> 01:06.800]  In recent news, a U.S. District Judge Lee Yackel denied the request of three University
[01:06.800 --> 01:11.160]  of Texas and Austin professors to block the implementation of the state's campus carry
[01:11.160 --> 01:12.160]  law.
[01:12.160 --> 01:15.680]  The judge said that the professors had failed to establish a substantial likelihood of ultimate
[01:15.680 --> 01:21.160]  success on the merits of their assertive claims, which were that guns in classrooms violate
[01:21.160 --> 01:23.600]  free speech and equal protection rights.
[01:23.600 --> 01:28.160]  UT President Gregory Fanvez said in a written statement that the university would continue
[01:28.160 --> 01:31.360]  to work with faculty members concerned about the law.
[01:31.360 --> 01:35.260]  He added that he's committed to upholding the school's core values of academic freedom
[01:35.260 --> 01:40.440]  and free speech, while Attorney General Ken Paxton said that he was pleased but not surprised
[01:40.440 --> 01:45.480]  by the decision and that there is simply no legal justification to deny licensed, law-abiding
[01:45.480 --> 01:50.560]  citizens on campus the same measure of personal protection they are entitled to elsewhere
[01:50.560 --> 01:57.280]  in Texas.
[01:57.280 --> 02:02.000]  The Redlands Unified School District settled on and agreed to pay out $6 million to a victim
[02:02.000 --> 02:05.440]  of sexual abuse by one of their teachers at one of their high schools.
[02:05.440 --> 02:08.920]  The attorney for the victim, Vince Finaldi, stated that this is the largest child sexual
[02:08.920 --> 02:13.480]  abuse settlement against a public entity in U.S. history, reason being, he is saying,
[02:13.480 --> 02:17.720]  that the school district knew that Laura Whitehurst was sexually abusing students and did nothing
[02:17.720 --> 02:18.720]  about it.
[02:18.720 --> 02:22.360]  The school's spokesperson for the district obviously denies that they knew anything about
[02:22.360 --> 02:26.720]  the abuse, clarifying that it was just the district wanting to avoid further costly legal
[02:26.720 --> 02:27.720]  battles.
[02:27.720 --> 02:30.960]  The school district is assuring teachers and parents that the $6 million settlement will
[02:30.960 --> 02:39.160]  not affect its budget for teachers and other educational expenses.
[02:39.160 --> 02:43.080]  If Texas had succeeded before this year, it would have ranked third in the world in the
[02:43.080 --> 02:44.080]  2016 Olympics.
[02:44.080 --> 02:50.160]  Texas alone took home 42 medals, 26 gold, 6 silver, and 10 bronze in the 2016 Rio de
[02:50.160 --> 03:16.800]  Janeiro Olympics.
[03:16.800 --> 03:21.920]  And the governor has called treated capacitors in Texas with,, center
[03:21.920 --> 03:31.680]  For more information on this explains my
[03:31.680 --> 03:43.500]  Xbox Plus bank account of but it's doing nothing but
[03:43.500 --> 03:44.620]  polluting it dollars a day.
[03:44.620 --> 03:36.680]  This is California's first National Committee Vision to
[03:36.680 --> 03:38.620]  do public clinical analysis of sexual abuse.
[03:38.620 --> 03:40.380]  What do you think my org's JY's are looking at?
[03:40.380 --> 03:41.380]  He had two shares.
[03:41.380 --> 03:43.460]  The mother of the elementary school GoPro is willing to be part of the
[03:43.460 --> 03:46.460]  The man had the answer for the wicked thing he'd done
[03:46.460 --> 03:50.460]  He'd take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree
[03:50.460 --> 03:56.460]  Round up all of them bad boys, hang them high up the tree
[03:56.460 --> 04:00.460]  For all the people to see
[04:00.460 --> 04:04.460]  That justice is the one thing you should always find
[04:04.460 --> 04:08.460]  You gotta saddle up your boys, you gotta draw a hard line
[04:08.460 --> 04:12.460]  When the gospel settles, we'll sing a victory tune
[04:12.460 --> 04:16.460]  And we'll all meet back at the waterfall soon
[04:16.460 --> 04:21.460]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing
[04:21.460 --> 04:26.460]  Whiskey for my men, beer for my horses
[04:31.460 --> 04:39.460]  Alright folks, good evening, it is August 29th, 2016
[04:39.460 --> 04:45.460]  Alright, now there's more and more going on
[04:45.460 --> 04:50.460]  That's going wrong in our country that we can shake a stick at
[04:50.460 --> 04:55.460]  Texas being very high on that list of corrupt individuals
[04:55.460 --> 04:59.460]  Trying their best to overturn the rights and liberty of the people
[04:59.460 --> 05:01.460]  For the gross power of the state
[05:01.460 --> 05:05.460]  Now, I told you a week or two ago that I was working on a case
[05:05.460 --> 05:12.460]  Where someone is being charged with a felony evading arrest
[05:12.460 --> 05:14.460]  Under the penal code
[05:14.460 --> 05:20.460]  When in fact the case does not allow the state to charge them
[05:20.460 --> 05:25.460]  With anything more than evading under the transportation code
[05:25.460 --> 05:28.460]  If the transportation code ever applied to begin with
[05:28.460 --> 05:31.460]  In order to give the officer probable cause
[05:31.460 --> 05:36.460]  To have attempted to stop the individual in the first place
[05:36.460 --> 05:41.460]  Now, let's look at some straight up facts about what the statute is
[05:41.460 --> 05:44.460]  We have the 2008 case of Aziz v. State
[05:44.460 --> 05:49.460]  And we have numerous case law before that, straight here out of Texas here
[05:49.460 --> 05:52.460]  That makes it very, very clear that the state cannot charge you
[05:52.460 --> 05:54.460]  With a penal code offense
[05:54.460 --> 05:58.460]  If the code regulating the subject matter activity
[05:58.460 --> 06:05.460]  That was the causation of the additional charge or charges
[06:05.460 --> 06:07.460]  Was within another code
[06:07.460 --> 06:14.460]  And covers the charges you're trying to make from the penal code
[06:14.460 --> 06:21.460]  In the case of Aziz, the argument was all over the failure to appear requirements
[06:21.460 --> 06:29.460]  What the state was trying to do was to charge him a $500 failure to appear fine out of the penal code
[06:29.460 --> 06:34.460]  And the charge tracked the language directly out of the penal code
[06:34.460 --> 06:41.460]  But it completely ignored the fact that the transportation code has a failure to appear charge in it
[06:41.460 --> 06:45.460]  Under 543.010, I believe it is
[06:45.460 --> 06:48.460]  And in the transportation code
[06:48.460 --> 06:53.460]  For any charge for which there is not a defined money amount
[06:53.460 --> 06:59.460]  The maximum amount that can be charged for any offense under that code is $200
[06:59.460 --> 07:06.460]  So they were trying to charge him a $500 fine and charge him with a much higher level of offense
[07:06.460 --> 07:09.460]  Than they were authorized to do by the transportation code
[07:09.460 --> 07:12.460]  Which is what they initially stopped him under to begin with
[07:12.460 --> 07:16.460]  It was the statute causing the encounter, okay?
[07:16.460 --> 07:21.460]  They initially stopped him for speeding, wrote him a ticket or some such
[07:21.460 --> 07:26.460]  And then when he didn't appear in court, they tried to charge him with failure to appear, okay?
[07:26.460 --> 07:30.460]  Now there's multiple problems with this, of course, when it comes to Class C misdemeanors
[07:30.460 --> 07:34.460]  First and foremost, yes, the transportation code does say
[07:34.460 --> 07:40.460]  That when an individual fails to appear in response to a citation issued under that code
[07:40.460 --> 07:44.460]  That the person is guilty of failure to appear, okay?
[07:44.460 --> 07:50.460]  But in that sense and in that context
[07:50.460 --> 08:00.460]  That statute is making a general statement as to the type of offense you're being charged with under the transportation code
[08:00.460 --> 08:06.460]  It's saying if you're issued a citation, doesn't matter whether it's for Class A, Class B or Class C
[08:06.460 --> 08:09.460]  Then you can be charged with failure to appear
[08:09.460 --> 08:17.460]  Now this is saying you will be, or you must be, says you can be, or you may be, okay?
[08:17.460 --> 08:21.460]  Then you go over to the code of criminal procedure
[08:21.460 --> 08:29.460]  You read 14.06B&C, which is arrest without warrant, which is what occurs in a transportation-related case
[08:29.460 --> 08:32.460]  It's an arrest without a warrant
[08:32.460 --> 08:40.460]  14.06B&C directs you to 15.17 of the code of criminal procedure
[08:40.460 --> 08:48.460]  Which walks you through all the things that are supposed to happen when a person appears in response to a citation, okay?
[08:48.460 --> 08:54.460]  And 15.17 falls under the chapter arrest with warrant
[08:54.460 --> 08:59.460]  But it contains the procedure for everything
[08:59.460 --> 09:07.460]  Whether the person was actually arrested on a warrant or whether the person actually comes in in response to a promise to appear on a citation
[09:07.460 --> 09:17.460]  And 14.06A, B, and C all make sure that tells you, hey, send them to 15.17G to have that done
[09:17.460 --> 09:19.460]  Or 15.17
[09:19.460 --> 09:24.460]  And then when you read down to 15.17G of the code of criminal procedure
[09:24.460 --> 09:33.460]  It clearly tells you that if the charge on the citation is for a Class C fine only offense
[09:33.460 --> 09:37.460]  It doesn't authorize the court to issue a warrant
[09:37.460 --> 09:43.460]  It tells the court to go look at, or to get a complaint, okay?
[09:43.460 --> 09:49.460]  That if the person fails to appear in a promise to appear on a citation for a Class C fine only
[09:49.460 --> 09:54.460]  Then the court's only authorization under law is to seek a complaint
[09:54.460 --> 09:56.460]  That's it
[09:56.460 --> 10:05.460]  But if it's for an offense other than a Class C, they are sent over to 14.06C
[10:05.460 --> 10:13.460]  Where it specifically states that if it is a Class A or B, then the court may issue a warrant
[10:13.460 --> 10:15.460]  You follow?
[10:15.460 --> 10:22.460]  Look at the other statutes, 27.14D, where they try to say that they can use the citation as the complaint
[10:22.460 --> 10:29.460]  But they fail to read the entire statute where it says that is only doable if there is a signed written waiver
[10:29.460 --> 10:35.460]  By the accused and the prosecution both agreeing to use the citation as a complaint
[10:35.460 --> 10:44.460]  Which then creates a conflict with 45.019A, which says these are the legal requisites of a proper complaint
[10:44.460 --> 10:51.460]  And it is not sufficient on its face unless it has these things, and the citation doesn't have them
[10:51.460 --> 10:58.460]  Then you have the other problem of the case law in Texas that says the minimum bar to invoking the jurisdiction of a court
[10:58.460 --> 11:05.460]  In direct violation of the Texas Constitution and the Code of Criminal Procedure, I might add, is a sworn complaint
[11:05.460 --> 11:10.460]  We don't have any sworn complaints in these courts, we only have verified complaints
[11:10.460 --> 11:17.460]  The difference between sworn and verified, sworn is made under oath and under penalty of perjury
[11:17.460 --> 11:21.460]  Which the criminal complaint is not done under
[11:21.460 --> 11:29.460]  It is simply verified, verified meaning that the person who signs counter to the affiant
[11:29.460 --> 11:35.460]  The only thing they're verifying is that the affiant is the one that signed it
[11:35.460 --> 11:41.460]  They're not administering an oath to the affiant that says I swear under penalty of perjury
[11:41.460 --> 11:49.460]  That all the facts asserted in this complaint are true to the best of my knowledge and ability
[11:49.460 --> 11:56.460]  Okay, they're not saying that at all, so it's not a sworn complaint
[11:56.460 --> 12:05.460]  So if the minimum bar is a sworn complaint and the citation doesn't meet the requirements of a sworn complaint under 45.019A
[12:05.460 --> 12:13.460]  Then 27.14D is in conflict with law, it is in conflict with case opinion
[12:13.460 --> 12:21.460]  It is in conflict completely with the Constitution as to what invokes jurisdiction of a court in Texas
[12:21.460 --> 12:26.460]  Because Article 5, Section 12B of the Texas Constitution says only an indictment or information can do that
[12:26.460 --> 12:31.460]  And a complaint is neither one
[12:31.460 --> 12:35.460]  And we can tie all these things together one step at a time just like I'm doing right here
[12:35.460 --> 12:42.460]  Each one of them connects, they just don't ever look at them as if they're connected
[12:42.460 --> 12:46.460]  They never look at these statutes in paramateria
[12:46.460 --> 12:51.460]  So in relation to this allegation under the penal code of felony evasion
[12:51.460 --> 12:58.460]  They're in direct conflict with 545.421 of the transportation code
[12:58.460 --> 13:06.460]  Saying that the maximum this can be under these circumstances is a Class B or under other circumstances a Class A
[13:06.460 --> 13:10.460]  But it can't be a felony
[13:10.460 --> 13:24.460]  Now the case of Aziz v. State went to exactly that issue, you're charging me under the penal code for something for which the transportation code says you must charge me this way and you can only fine me this way
[13:24.460 --> 13:36.460]  Now let's also look at the fact that the Code of Criminal Procedure specifically says that in a felony charge the accused has a right to an examining trial
[13:36.460 --> 13:40.460]  Okay, that's written right into the Code of Criminal Procedure
[13:40.460 --> 13:49.460]  But we have case law from our corrupt courts and the corrupt prosecutors and corrupt attorneys sitting as the judges
[13:49.460 --> 14:02.460]  That violates the Code of Criminal Procedure by declaring that even if the person being charged with a felony has not received an examining trial
[14:02.460 --> 14:14.460]  If the prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict him before the examining trial can be had, the right to the examining trial vanishes
[14:14.460 --> 14:18.460]  Now why is the right to the examining trial so important?
[14:18.460 --> 14:21.460]  Well let's look at what we have here
[14:21.460 --> 14:33.460]  We have a warrantless arrest under a subject matter jurisdiction that does not apply to the individual against which it's being exercised
[14:33.460 --> 14:36.460]  That's problem number one
[14:36.460 --> 14:47.460]  Problem number two is that such an exercise makes the action unlawful and illegal, a complete Fourth and Fifth Amendment violation in and of itself
[14:47.460 --> 14:52.460]  Because there was no probable cause to make the arrest
[14:52.460 --> 14:56.460]  There was no probable cause to initiate the stop
[14:56.460 --> 15:05.460]  Because the officer had no articulable facts by which to state the person I am pulling over is engaging in transportation
[15:05.460 --> 15:13.460]  And therefore, if they are exceeding the posted speed limit, they are liable under the transportation code for speeding
[15:13.460 --> 15:23.460]  And then let's not even forget the fact or ignore the fact that the Texas transportation code does not define a charge of speeding anywhere
[15:23.460 --> 15:26.460]  Anywhere
[15:26.460 --> 15:37.460]  And 1.03 of the penal code specifically says if a code does not specifically define an offense, it is not an offense
[15:37.460 --> 15:41.460]  And yet there is no such offense in the entirety of the transportation code
[15:41.460 --> 15:47.460]  There is a section that says speeding
[15:47.460 --> 15:52.460]  But when you read it, nowhere in there does the word offense appear
[15:52.460 --> 15:56.460]  Nowhere in there does the word infraction appear
[15:56.460 --> 16:00.460]  See the problem?
[16:00.460 --> 16:09.460]  You have contradictory statute after contradictory statute that is being ignored by our courts
[16:09.460 --> 16:13.460]  By attorneys who are supposed to know the law
[16:13.460 --> 16:19.460]  But who I have yet to ever find a single one of that has actually read it
[16:19.460 --> 16:26.460]  It's just like the one that called into the show and wanted to argue with me about how wrong I was on the right to travel
[16:26.460 --> 16:31.460]  And the commercial activity issue when it comes to transportation
[16:31.460 --> 16:40.460]  Yet he has never studied one word of Texas law, he has never studied one word of the information I've got on this subject
[16:40.460 --> 16:43.460]  But he's going to tell me I'm wrong
[16:43.460 --> 16:46.460]  That's the hubris of an attorney
[16:46.460 --> 16:53.460]  That they believe that they already know it all and can't learn anything new from someone that isn't in their little club
[16:53.460 --> 16:55.460]  Well, that's dead wrong
[16:55.460 --> 16:59.460]  Alright folks, we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang on
[16:59.460 --> 17:05.460]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition
[17:05.460 --> 17:10.460]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that
[17:10.460 --> 17:16.460]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition
[17:16.460 --> 17:24.460]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need
[17:24.460 --> 17:30.460]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject
[17:30.460 --> 17:38.460]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others
[17:38.460 --> 17:46.460]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio
[17:46.460 --> 17:50.460]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us
[17:50.460 --> 17:57.460]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income
[17:57.460 --> 17:59.460]  Order now
[17:59.460 --> 18:04.460]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:04.460 --> 18:08.460]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method
[18:08.460 --> 18:14.460]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two
[18:14.460 --> 18:20.460]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[18:20.460 --> 18:24.460]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons
[18:24.460 --> 18:26.460]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[18:26.460 --> 18:28.460]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[18:28.460 --> 18:33.460]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[18:33.460 --> 18:38.460]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[18:38.460 --> 18:40.460]  Personal consultation is available as well
[18:40.460 --> 18:46.460]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.460 --> 18:49.460]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[18:49.460 --> 18:51.460]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[18:51.460 --> 18:57.460]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.460 --> 19:00.460]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[19:00.460 --> 19:10.460]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com
[19:24.460 --> 19:29.460]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio
[19:29.460 --> 19:32.460]  All right, now continuing on
[19:32.460 --> 19:36.460]  The other issue we're going to have with this particular charge that they're making
[19:36.460 --> 19:39.460]  Under the case of a ZV state
[19:39.460 --> 19:44.460]  Is when they try to charge you under the penal code
[19:44.460 --> 19:46.460]  And they're conflicting with the transportation code
[19:46.460 --> 19:49.460]  That's going to wind up getting overturned at the higher level
[19:49.460 --> 19:51.460]  But here's the other issue
[19:51.460 --> 19:56.460]  Since the individual that was being stopped was being stopped by a DPS officer
[19:56.460 --> 20:00.460]  Who the administrative code says very clearly under Title 37
[20:00.460 --> 20:04.460]  Whose entire mission when it comes to traffic
[20:04.460 --> 20:10.460]  Is to regulate commercial and for-hire traffic
[20:10.460 --> 20:18.460]  And to supervise, not regulate, supervise traffic on rural highways
[20:18.460 --> 20:23.460]  And then when you look at the regulatory programs under that same title
[20:23.460 --> 20:27.460]  For the Department of Public Safety in relation to their mission
[20:27.460 --> 20:30.460]  You will see that it encompasses
[20:30.460 --> 20:39.460]  Drivers licensing, motor vehicle inspection, and financial responsibility
[20:39.460 --> 20:46.460]  Those programs are all the ones that they try to charge us criminally for not participating in
[20:46.460 --> 20:54.460]  And yet the only thing they apply to is commercial and for-hire regulated occupations
[20:54.460 --> 20:57.460]  That use the highways for business
[20:57.460 --> 20:59.460]  That's it
[20:59.460 --> 21:04.460]  That's why it's called a transportation code
[21:04.460 --> 21:07.460]  It's got nothing to do with the general public
[21:07.460 --> 21:10.460]  Even when you look at other parts of the code
[21:10.460 --> 21:14.460]  As each iteration of the legislature goes by
[21:14.460 --> 21:20.460]  The agency rewrite of the statutes that they submit to the legislature to be voted on
[21:20.460 --> 21:27.460]  That the legislature does not read, which we have evidence of at the yin-yang and the engrossed bill
[21:27.460 --> 21:31.460]  That they do not read the bills that they're signing into law
[21:31.460 --> 21:33.460]  In the form of a statute anyway
[21:33.460 --> 21:38.460]  Which is nothing more than the regulatory adaptation of the underlying law
[21:38.460 --> 21:42.460]  Which itself has not been altered
[21:42.460 --> 21:47.460]  And the Texas Constitution has a specific constitutional prohibition
[21:47.460 --> 21:55.460]  That forbids the amending of a legislative law by statutory amendment
[21:55.460 --> 22:01.460]  So when you attorneys want to tell me that the statute is the law, you are idiots
[22:01.460 --> 22:03.460]  It is not the law
[22:03.460 --> 22:08.460]  It is an agency interpretation of the legislative enactment
[22:08.460 --> 22:14.460]  The legislative enactment in the form of the engrossed bill, which is the bill submitted to the governor
[22:14.460 --> 22:21.460]  And which received his signature and was thus enacted into law, is the law
[22:21.460 --> 22:27.460]  And for those of you that haven't studied up on your legal maxims in the attorney world lately
[22:27.460 --> 22:32.460]  The maxim of something similar is never the same
[22:32.460 --> 22:34.460]  Is in control here
[22:34.460 --> 22:42.460]  A statute is not the same as the engrossed bill enacted by the legislature and signed by the governor
[22:42.460 --> 22:45.460]  Not even close
[22:45.460 --> 22:55.460]  It is a legislatively approved statutory rewrite under the Statutory Revision Act of 1963
[22:55.460 --> 23:03.460]  Which is the act handled by the agencies and not the legislature
[23:03.460 --> 23:09.460]  So no, the statutes are not law in Texas
[23:09.460 --> 23:17.460]  And they aren't anywhere else either if you actually go and study what the Constitution of your particular state says about it
[23:17.460 --> 23:28.460]  Now, since these statutes aren't the actual law, they can't amend the original intent of the legislature in regulating transportation
[23:28.460 --> 23:30.460]  No matter how they change the wording
[23:30.460 --> 23:40.460]  Yet each legislative session and iteration of these statutory revisions, they try to change the legislative intent of the actual underlying law
[23:40.460 --> 23:42.460]  How are they doing this?
[23:42.460 --> 23:48.460]  A perfect example would be when you watch my Info Wars video from 2011
[23:48.460 --> 23:53.460]  In there I give you the transportation code definition of light truck
[23:53.460 --> 24:01.460]  And in that definition there are very particular phrases or very particular terms in there that you want to pay attention to
[24:01.460 --> 24:05.460]  Commercial being the primary one
[24:05.460 --> 24:13.460]  In the 2011 video I showed you the definition, the definition for light truck said that it was for commercial use
[24:13.460 --> 24:23.460]  Fast forward to 2015, the legislature has signed into the statutory scheme, the regulation side of it
[24:23.460 --> 24:32.460]  The rewrite by the agency that removed commercial from the definition of light truck
[24:32.460 --> 24:43.460]  But the underlying law that the statutory revision is based on has never been changed
[24:43.460 --> 24:55.460]  So what they are attempting to do is to disguise the original legislative intent of regulating commercial use of the roads
[24:55.460 --> 25:03.460]  By making it once again get rid of all the commercial references to make it appear as if it applies across the board to everyone
[25:03.460 --> 25:08.460]  It is constructive fraud
[25:08.460 --> 25:15.460]  Plain and simple, constructive fraud
[25:15.460 --> 25:23.460]  This is one of the things that I've tried to show people how to do is to do the historical research on the actual legislative acts
[25:23.460 --> 25:29.460]  Don't ever trust a statute, never, never ever ever trust a statute
[25:29.460 --> 25:33.460]  The statute is void if it is not in compliance with the underlying law
[25:33.460 --> 25:43.460]  It's null and void because it cannot expand or alter the underlying law in its statutory scheme
[25:43.460 --> 25:45.460]  Can't do it
[25:45.460 --> 25:52.460]  Yet that is exactly what they did in the rewrite of the transportation code in 1995
[25:52.460 --> 26:04.460]  They took many different legislative enactments and they recodified them all under a single enactment called the transportation code
[26:04.460 --> 26:09.460]  But what they recodified was not the underlying law
[26:09.460 --> 26:16.460]  They didn't repeal all of these other acts and then reenact them as a transportation code
[26:16.460 --> 26:18.460]  No, they didn't do that
[26:18.460 --> 26:20.460]  They didn't repeal any of them
[26:20.460 --> 26:33.460]  What they did was go through the statutory revision program to renumber, reword, and reorganize the existing statutory scheme
[26:33.460 --> 26:39.460]  into a single codified scheme now called the transportation code
[26:39.460 --> 26:45.460]  But one of the things they tell us in the caption of the bill that that statutory scheme is based upon is
[26:45.460 --> 26:57.460]  is that this is a recodification of existing statutes relating to the regulation of transportation
[26:57.460 --> 27:05.460]  So the legislature is telling us right there that it was regulating transportation before we made this change in 1995
[27:05.460 --> 27:20.460]  And this recodification, since it contains no substantive changes, which was a ball-faced lie, is also doing exactly the same thing, regulating transportation
[27:20.460 --> 27:39.460]  And then, as the years have rolled by, they have carefully crafted the terminology used in the recodification to quietly cull out all references to the original commercial nature of the code
[27:39.460 --> 27:48.460]  Slowly but surely, they are removing those so that it looks applicable across the board when in fact it is not
[27:48.460 --> 27:55.460]  because they cannot change legislative intent through statutory amendment
[27:55.460 --> 27:58.460]  Okay? Can't do it
[27:58.460 --> 28:12.460]  Everything you are being told about the so-called laws in Texas when they're using any one of these recodified codes is a lie
[28:12.460 --> 28:14.460]  Pick any code
[28:14.460 --> 28:19.460]  Take that code and compare it to the actual law upon which it sits
[28:19.460 --> 28:26.460]  And you will find discrepancy after discrepancy after discrepancy where they are altering legislative intent
[28:26.460 --> 28:33.460]  They are expanding the power of the statutes over the actual law upon which it's sitting
[28:33.460 --> 28:44.460]  They're doing pretty much the same thing the IRS has done with the income tax in relation to the laws passed by Congress versus the Code of Federal Regulation rewrites by the Treasury Department
[28:44.460 --> 28:54.460]  And the Secretary of the Treasury telling the IRS to tax everybody regardless of what the law actually says
[28:54.460 --> 28:59.460]  It is constructive fraud
[28:59.460 --> 29:12.460]  And who are the brain trusts that design the statutory schemes to create this constructive fraud?
[29:12.460 --> 29:14.460]  The answer is very simple
[29:14.460 --> 29:16.460]  It's not one I have to make up
[29:16.460 --> 29:22.460]  It's not one I have to do anything other than just say attorneys
[29:22.460 --> 29:25.460]  Attorneys are responsible for every bit of this
[29:25.460 --> 29:26.460]  Why?
[29:26.460 --> 29:33.460]  Because every one of these things when they're rewritten by this agency has to undergo legal review by an attorney
[29:33.460 --> 29:40.460]  And the attorney is the one that signs off on whether or not the language is constitutionally acceptable
[29:40.460 --> 29:47.460]  But what he never checks to see is, is it acceptable in the terms of the original enactment?
[29:47.460 --> 29:50.460]  Doesn't look at that at all
[29:50.460 --> 29:59.460]  Alright folks, y'all hang in there. The call in number is 512-646-1984. You can give us the call and get in line and we'll be right back
[29:59.460 --> 30:06.460]  Magnificent monarchs. Turns out those beautiful orange and black butterflies are natural born naturopaths
[30:06.460 --> 30:10.460]  They not only sense illness but they can find the right botanic cure
[30:10.460 --> 30:14.460]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment to tell you more
[30:14.460 --> 30:21.460]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information
[30:21.460 --> 30:22.460]  That's creepy
[30:22.460 --> 30:24.460]  But it doesn't have to be that way
[30:24.460 --> 30:27.460]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine
[30:27.460 --> 30:32.460]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies
[30:32.460 --> 30:34.460]  And they're third party certified
[30:34.460 --> 30:38.460]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage
[30:38.460 --> 30:41.460]  Great search results and total privacy
[30:41.460 --> 30:44.460]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine
[30:44.460 --> 30:48.460]  Mother monarch butterflies have a second sense when it comes to illness
[30:48.460 --> 30:52.460]  Somehow females know when they have deadly parasitic infections
[30:52.460 --> 30:57.460]  They also realize they'll pass the disease on to their young and they take steps to cure them
[30:57.460 --> 30:59.460]  The monarch's egg weighing preferences are the key
[30:59.460 --> 31:02.460]  Monarchs lay their eggs on milkweed plants
[31:02.460 --> 31:05.460]  The mothers who are uninfected choose their plants at random
[31:05.460 --> 31:10.460]  But the infected mothers are careful to lay their eggs on particular milkweed plants that are toxic to the parasites
[31:10.460 --> 31:13.460]  Their babies hatch, munch on the plants and get better
[31:13.460 --> 31:17.460]  Scientists are watching other creatures hoping they use plant cures too
[31:17.460 --> 31:20.460]  If so, we might have a lot to learn from them about natural remedies
[31:20.460 --> 31:25.460]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[31:30.460 --> 31:35.460]  This is Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11
[31:35.460 --> 31:37.460]  The government says that fire brought it down
[31:37.460 --> 31:42.460]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition
[31:42.460 --> 31:45.460]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives
[31:45.460 --> 31:48.460]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying
[31:48.460 --> 31:49.460]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist
[31:49.460 --> 31:50.460]  I'm not a structural engineer
[31:50.460 --> 31:52.460]  I'm a New York City correction officer
[31:52.460 --> 31:53.460]  I'm an Air Force pilot
[31:53.460 --> 31:54.460]  I'm a father who lost his son
[31:54.460 --> 31:57.460]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth
[31:57.460 --> 32:00.460]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today
[32:01.460 --> 32:04.460]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar
[32:04.460 --> 32:07.460]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society
[32:07.460 --> 32:09.460]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society
[32:09.460 --> 32:12.460]  Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights
[32:12.460 --> 32:15.460]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place
[32:15.460 --> 32:17.460]  The right to act in our own private capacity
[32:17.460 --> 32:19.460]  And most importantly, the right to due process of law
[32:19.460 --> 32:25.460]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[32:25.460 --> 32:28.460]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio
[32:28.460 --> 32:30.460]  Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:30.460 --> 32:34.460]  That will help you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law
[32:34.460 --> 32:40.460]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today
[32:40.460 --> 32:42.460]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book
[32:42.460 --> 32:44.460]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie
[32:44.460 --> 32:47.460]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[32:47.460 --> 32:50.460]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material
[32:50.460 --> 32:54.460]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com
[32:54.460 --> 33:01.460]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve
[33:01.460 --> 33:11.460]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:11.460 --> 33:39.460]  Music
[33:39.460 --> 33:43.460]  Alright folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio
[33:43.460 --> 33:48.460]  The calling number is 512-646-1984 if you want to call and get in line
[33:48.460 --> 33:51.460]  And we'll start taking your calls here in a minute
[33:51.460 --> 33:57.460]  Now, last but not least, in relation to this allegation against this individual being charged with felony evasion
[33:57.460 --> 34:01.460]  Instead of the transportation code version of a misdemeanor
[34:01.460 --> 34:07.460]  I'm going to be writing up the paperwork for them to be using in their defense in this case
[34:07.460 --> 34:12.460]  These are very good people that they're trying to do this to and I don't
[34:12.460 --> 34:16.460]  And what's being done is not right
[34:16.460 --> 34:19.460]  The state is overstepping its bounds big time
[34:19.460 --> 34:25.460]  This DPS officer had no lawful authority to initiate this stop
[34:25.460 --> 34:33.460]  This is one of those practice stops that the Border Patrol uses local law enforcement and state resources
[34:33.460 --> 34:42.460]  To do its drug interdiction practices by harassing civilians without any probable cause whatsoever
[34:42.460 --> 34:48.460]  Now, it doesn't help that the individual they're trying to do this to
[34:48.460 --> 34:56.460]  Is someone that is peed in their pool more often than they care to mention because of their corrupt behavior
[34:56.460 --> 35:01.460]  This individual has filed criminal charges on these people or at least he's tried
[35:01.460 --> 35:09.460]  But the law enforcement in that area is just as corrupt as any other part of the government in the state of Texas is
[35:09.460 --> 35:14.460]  It's all a good old boy town where the people that control the town control everything
[35:14.460 --> 35:21.460]  Including the law enforcement because they're all in bed together for the same corrupt crap
[35:21.460 --> 35:28.460]  So they're after this guy to get him out of their hair because he has been there fighting them tooth and nail
[35:28.460 --> 35:32.460]  Every inch of the way for every corrupt thing they've done
[35:32.460 --> 35:39.460]  He's responsible for organizing a lot of the other people in the area to fight back against what these corrupt individuals are doing as well
[35:39.460 --> 35:43.460]  And it's certainly costing him to do it
[35:43.460 --> 35:49.460]  Something needs to be done so I'm going to do whatever I can to help them with that
[35:49.460 --> 35:55.460]  Yes, they're going to be paying me for the time and effort but I told them what I normally charge
[35:55.460 --> 36:02.460]  They agreed to that and that's fine but the fact is they're being mistreated by the state
[36:02.460 --> 36:07.460]  The state is doing everything it can to act corruptly in this matter
[36:07.460 --> 36:12.460]  The DPS officer lacked any authority and probable cause to initiate a stop for speeding
[36:12.460 --> 36:22.460]  Why? 545.351 and 352 of the transportation code, if it applied at all, does not define an offense for speeding
[36:22.460 --> 36:32.460]  And even if it did, the elements of speeding require that for someone to be charged that they had to fail to exercise due care
[36:32.460 --> 36:39.460]  In a negligent manner, not taking consideration of the circumstances and conditions and hazards existing at the time
[36:39.460 --> 36:47.460]  And by doing so, failed to control their speed in a manner that failed to avoid a collision
[36:47.460 --> 36:55.460]  With another person or vehicle already lawfully upon or entering the highway
[36:55.460 --> 37:02.460]  You get that? The only way in Texas that you could ever be charged with speeding lawfully
[37:02.460 --> 37:12.460]  Is if you hit someone or a vehicle that was already on the road or entering the road in a lawful manner
[37:12.460 --> 37:21.460]  Remember that scene out of Smallville where Clark Kent is trying to lift up a tractor to change a tire or something on it
[37:21.460 --> 37:26.460]  And his powers are going out of whack and suddenly the tractor shoots straight up into the stratosphere
[37:26.460 --> 37:33.460]  And lands at the crossroads 10 miles from their farm and just shatters in the highway
[37:33.460 --> 37:38.460]  That's the only way another vehicle could unlawfully enter a highway I would think
[37:38.460 --> 37:41.460]  Unless it came barreling out of a field or something like that
[37:41.460 --> 37:47.460]  If you had hit that tractor falling out of the sky that way on the highway doing 70
[37:47.460 --> 37:53.460]  You still couldn't be charged with speeding because that tractor was not lawfully upon or entering the highway
[37:53.460 --> 37:58.460]  Same thing with somebody flying out of a cornfield
[37:58.460 --> 38:06.460]  And there's nothing in the statute that would authorize them to charge you with speeding if you lost control of the car and rolled off into a cornfield
[38:06.460 --> 38:09.460]  Or took out a bridge support or a telephone pole
[38:09.460 --> 38:21.460]  Because the statute specifically limits everything to a collision with another person or vehicle either lawfully upon already upon or entering the highway
[38:21.460 --> 38:24.460]  Nothing else
[38:24.460 --> 38:30.460]  Yet these prosecutors and these judges are constantly rewriting the statutes to suit themselves
[38:30.460 --> 38:33.460]  Take the DUI law here in Texas
[38:33.460 --> 38:40.460]  The DUI law says very plainly operating a motor vehicle upon a highway
[38:40.460 --> 38:49.460]  Someone that is asleep in their car in the front seat or back seat is not operating their car on a highway
[38:49.460 --> 38:52.460]  They're not
[38:52.460 --> 38:57.460]  Someone standing outside their car with their car keys in their hand
[38:57.460 --> 39:03.460]  Drunk as a skunk is not operating a motor vehicle on a highway
[39:03.460 --> 39:07.460]  And again, what's a motor vehicle? It's something defined by the transportation code
[39:07.460 --> 39:13.460]  Therefore it is something that relates only to the occupation of transportation
[39:13.460 --> 39:19.460]  Doesn't have squat to do with the public
[39:19.460 --> 39:28.460]  So they couldn't charge you with DUI under anything in the transportation code if you were operating your car
[39:28.460 --> 39:33.460]  Driving your car or traveling in your car on a highway under the influence
[39:33.460 --> 39:39.460]  They would have to use the penal code because the transportation code wouldn't apply to you
[39:39.460 --> 39:45.460]  But the moment they try to use the transportation code as the grounds to initiate their stop
[39:45.460 --> 39:55.460]  Then they're bound by everything in it wherever it has a statute that controls the outcome of the charges
[39:55.460 --> 40:01.460]  They don't get to ignore this one because they can charge better and higher over there
[40:01.460 --> 40:09.460]  Doesn't work that way, yet that's exactly what they're trying to do
[40:09.460 --> 40:19.460]  I for one would cast my vote so hard and high in the yay fashion that I would probably dislocate my shoulder
[40:19.460 --> 40:27.460]  If we were passing a law that said all attorneys had to be hung within 30 days
[40:27.460 --> 40:34.460]  I would be the first one to throw my name in the hat to be the one that pulls the lever
[40:34.460 --> 40:40.460]  And I would have no problem with doing it because it's just like to me
[40:40.460 --> 40:46.460]  Any other habitual criminal that has proven that they will never ever change their ways
[40:46.460 --> 40:51.460]  No matter how many people they harm, no matter how corrupt they have acted
[40:51.460 --> 41:00.460]  No matter what they have stolen and how they've gone about it or who has died because of what they've done
[41:00.460 --> 41:06.460]  I would have absolutely no pity at all on an attorney for that than I would for a career criminal
[41:06.460 --> 41:10.460]  Any other career criminal, let's leave it at that
[41:10.460 --> 41:15.460]  I just wouldn't
[41:15.460 --> 41:24.460]  They're not here to serve anybody, I don't care what they call you and tell you I did this and I did that and I fought for real rights
[41:24.460 --> 41:28.460]  Really, you fought for real rights
[41:28.460 --> 41:33.460]  Well, just exactly which rights are real and which ones aren't in your opinion
[41:33.460 --> 41:39.460]  If you want to talk about real violations, what makes this one greater or lesser than any other?
[41:39.460 --> 41:50.460]  Because the loss of even one is a harm and any harm by government to those who are supposed to be protecting is prohibited
[41:50.460 --> 41:55.460]  It's kind of like when people are arguing which sin is greater or lesser in the eyes of God
[41:55.460 --> 41:59.460]  There isn't a greater or lesser, all sin is equal
[41:59.460 --> 42:10.460]  Therefore, all deprivation of rights by government under corrupt practices, corrupt application and use of laws is equally abhorrent
[42:10.460 --> 42:16.460]  There is no real violations versus sort of violations
[42:16.460 --> 42:23.460]  I don't care what you people think in your little club
[42:23.460 --> 42:29.460]  Now, that being said, I've got a minute and a half before break, so when I get back on the other side, I will start taking calls
[42:29.460 --> 42:36.460]  If you want to call in and get in line and discuss anything, 512-646-1984
[42:36.460 --> 42:43.460]  Now, before we do get out of here though on the break, just remember, this is going to be a case worth watching
[42:43.460 --> 42:48.460]  If I can get information on what the case is and how it can be monitored and things like that
[42:48.460 --> 42:53.460]  and I get permission to get that information out from the folks involved, I'll do that
[42:53.460 --> 43:05.460]  It's out in West Texas in the border countries, so it's pretty lawless out there when it comes to what the local government officials can do and get away with
[43:05.460 --> 43:17.460]  You would have to far outnumber them with a local, willing to fight back population to have any ability to obtain justice in a place like this
[43:17.460 --> 43:27.460]  This is another place where the corruptness of attorneys is very apparent in the fact that they are the only ones that control courts of record
[43:27.460 --> 43:38.460]  No judge in a court of record can be anything other than an attorney according to what they have put in place in the statute
[43:38.460 --> 43:46.460]  Not what the Constitution says, how the attorneys got control of an entire department of government and then weaseled their way into every other department
[43:46.460 --> 43:52.460]  So they basically run everything as beyond me because that right there is a constitutional violation in itself
[43:52.460 --> 44:20.460]  Alright folks, 512-646-1984, we'll be right back
[44:22.460 --> 44:27.460]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too
[44:27.460 --> 44:33.460]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience
[44:33.460 --> 44:42.460]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[44:42.460 --> 44:51.460]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more
[44:51.460 --> 45:00.460]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ
[45:00.460 --> 45:13.460]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas
[45:13.460 --> 45:18.460]  Behind Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes
[45:18.460 --> 45:23.460]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine
[45:23.460 --> 45:31.460]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps and colloidal silver and gold
[45:31.460 --> 45:38.460]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com
[45:38.460 --> 45:44.460]  That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com
[45:44.460 --> 45:50.460]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products naturespureorganics.com
[46:14.460 --> 46:36.460]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio
[46:36.460 --> 46:43.460]  Alright, we have two callers on the board. We need some more. 512-646-1984
[46:43.460 --> 46:47.460]  First up is Truth Raider. Raider, what can I do for you?
[46:47.460 --> 46:51.460]  And you are going to ask questions, not give us commentary, right?
[46:51.460 --> 46:55.460]  Howdy Eddie. Just two questions tonight.
[46:55.460 --> 46:56.460]  Okay.
[46:56.460 --> 47:01.460]  And not commentary, but I'm going to read a motion to you and see if you approve of it.
[47:01.460 --> 47:03.460]  Whoa, whoa, whoa. How long is this motion?
[47:03.460 --> 47:10.460]  Let's see, about two and a half short paragraphs.
[47:10.460 --> 47:14.460]  Okay.
[47:14.460 --> 47:21.460]  Okay. I went to the initial appearance, I guess the arraignment as they call it,
[47:21.460 --> 47:29.460]  and I filed this prior to going to the first appearance, but it was never recognized in court.
[47:29.460 --> 47:33.460]  But I'm going to take this to the trial because the judge...
[47:33.460 --> 47:37.460]  Okay, this is all commentary. Read me the paragraphs.
[47:37.460 --> 47:43.460]  Okay. Motion to suppress non-criminal traffic stop and officer's testimony.
[47:43.460 --> 47:53.460]  There is no authority granted to a peace officer, law enforcement officer, to arrest, detain any individual for a civil infraction, traffic stop or Terry stop.
[47:53.460 --> 48:06.460]  The lawful authority to detain or arrest without a warrant is vested in an officer only in relation to felonies or misdemeanors, breaches of the peace, and a civil infraction is none of these.
[48:06.460 --> 48:11.460]  The traffic stop by the officer in this case was illegal.
[48:11.460 --> 48:18.460]  Therefore, I demand a motion to quash this case and dismiss immediately in the interest of justice.
[48:18.460 --> 48:20.460]  And my name is signed to it.
[48:20.460 --> 48:22.460]  Okay. Guess what?
[48:22.460 --> 48:26.460]  Why are you asking for a dismissal in a motion to quash?
[48:26.460 --> 48:32.460]  And why are you not specifically stating what you're asking to have quashed?
[48:32.460 --> 48:40.460]  Guess what a motion to quash must say. Take a wild guess.
[48:40.460 --> 48:44.460]  Testimony by the officer.
[48:44.460 --> 48:53.460]  Motion to suppress any and all documents that intend to be introduced as evidence or in support of testimony of the witness.
[48:53.460 --> 48:56.460]  Any testimony of said witness.
[48:56.460 --> 49:06.460]  Any other evidence obtained or discovered or in the possession of the prosecution or the witness that intends to be produced at trial for any purpose.
[49:06.460 --> 49:11.460]  You at least got to tell them what it is you want to suppress.
[49:11.460 --> 49:15.460]  Where is that in your paragraphs?
[49:15.460 --> 49:20.460]  It's not. It's a generalization and I read it to you to see what mistakes that are in there.
[49:20.460 --> 49:24.460]  I would say that's the biggest glaring one you got.
[49:24.460 --> 49:25.460]  Okay.
[49:25.460 --> 49:39.460]  What have I told you folks time and time again, not just Raider, but all of you, when it comes to making general statements?
[49:39.460 --> 49:48.460]  Especially when it comes to something you want the other side to do.
[49:48.460 --> 49:50.460]  It's very simple.
[49:50.460 --> 49:53.460]  Don't!
[49:53.460 --> 49:55.460]  Okay. Very simple.
[49:55.460 --> 49:56.460]  You don't generalize.
[49:56.460 --> 50:09.460]  When you're moving the court to do something, you spell it out in as much detail as necessary to make sure that what you want done is perfectly clear to the court.
[50:09.460 --> 50:12.460]  Right?
[50:12.460 --> 50:20.460]  The court is not there to decide for you what should be suppressed.
[50:20.460 --> 50:23.460]  You have to know what you want suppressed because guess what?
[50:23.460 --> 50:30.460]  A motion to suppress doesn't necessarily apply to every piece of evidence in a case.
[50:30.460 --> 50:39.460]  You may only have the ability under certain circumstances to suppress certain pieces of evidence and not all of it.
[50:39.460 --> 50:49.460]  So how is the court supposed to distinguish between that when you don't tell them?
[50:49.460 --> 50:54.460]  I can't if it's a generalization, so I'll make that correction there.
[50:54.460 --> 51:00.460]  The trial date is on September 29th, so that gives me plenty of time.
[51:00.460 --> 51:09.460]  Yeah, provided they're going to give you a motions hearing on this or if they've already given you one if they plan on giving you another one.
[51:09.460 --> 51:10.460]  No, it's just a trial.
[51:10.460 --> 51:11.460]  Okay.
[51:11.460 --> 51:15.460]  Let me ask you another question here, Raider.
[51:15.460 --> 51:37.460]  Now, have you looked online to see any samples whatsoever filed in a court by an actual attorney and an actual pro se to see what the differences are in the way that they write motions to suppress in the venue in which you're located?
[51:37.460 --> 51:38.460]  No.
[51:38.460 --> 51:40.460]  Why not?
[51:40.460 --> 51:41.460]  I don't know of them.
[51:41.460 --> 51:43.460]  What do you mean you don't know of them?
[51:43.460 --> 51:45.460]  All you got to do is do a Google search.
[51:45.460 --> 51:54.460]  Motion to suppress Utah, Arizona, Oregon, wherever you're at.
[51:54.460 --> 51:58.460]  Motion to suppress Oregon.
[51:58.460 --> 51:59.460]  Okay.
[51:59.460 --> 52:04.460]  You can put in sample, you can put in template, or you can leave that off.
[52:04.460 --> 52:07.460]  And then see what documents come up.
[52:07.460 --> 52:17.460]  And believe it or not, you will almost always be able to find some template form that's been filed.
[52:17.460 --> 52:31.460]  You may even find that your state has an online forms library where you can download a template and see exactly what it is you're supposed to do.
[52:31.460 --> 52:37.460]  Okay. I'm writing that down and I will do that.
[52:37.460 --> 52:38.460]  Okay.
[52:38.460 --> 52:39.460]  Okay.
[52:39.460 --> 52:42.460]  Now, for the purpose of me reading this to you to see what is missing in there.
[52:42.460 --> 52:48.460]  Well, that's your first big problem.
[52:48.460 --> 52:55.460]  But in the first two paragraphs I wrote in, is that all right? Does that look good?
[52:55.460 --> 53:02.460]  Okay. Send me the motion. Hearing it is not the same as reading it with my own eyes.
[53:02.460 --> 53:03.460]  Okay.
[53:03.460 --> 53:14.460]  Okay. But right off the bat, what you didn't read there in that one, that's a very big noticeable mistake.
[53:14.460 --> 53:18.460]  Do not use generalities in your motions.
[53:18.460 --> 53:24.460]  Do not use generalities in your memorandums or your briefs.
[53:24.460 --> 53:30.460]  Talk in detail and with as few words as possible, of course, but still make sense.
[53:30.460 --> 53:44.460]  Talk in detail specifically about what your point is, your argument is, your demand is, your moving issue for the court is, what your legal question is.
[53:44.460 --> 53:59.460]  All right. Okay. So I should write down after these or before or somewhere in the two paragraphs in there, the exact citation number of the case.
[53:59.460 --> 54:08.460]  You can simply say citation in this specific case file or yes, you can write the specific citation number,
[54:08.460 --> 54:15.460]  whatever it takes to make sure that you're understood as to what you're asking to have suppressed.
[54:15.460 --> 54:16.460]  All right.
[54:16.460 --> 54:21.460]  Which one works best depends upon the context of how you write the rest of it.
[54:21.460 --> 54:27.460]  Okay. All right. We'll do that. Okay. That gives me a little time there.
[54:27.460 --> 54:32.460]  Try not to say stuff like any citation written by the officer.
[54:32.460 --> 54:39.460]  Okay. This specific citation and its number.
[54:39.460 --> 54:45.460]  You can move to suppress citation number XYZ7316451.
[54:45.460 --> 54:48.460]  Okay.
[54:48.460 --> 54:56.460]  All right. Now anywhere in there in this motion, do I make any type of explanation saying that this officer did not find or didn't suspect any?
[54:56.460 --> 55:03.460]  Okay. You're talking about different motion. A motion to suppress deals with suppressing things, period.
[55:03.460 --> 55:04.460]  Right. Okay.
[55:04.460 --> 55:09.460]  You want to challenge the arrest as being unlawful? Different motion.
[55:09.460 --> 55:11.460]  Okay.
[55:11.460 --> 55:18.460]  No probable cause, false imprisonment, false arrest, whatever it is in Oregon.
[55:18.460 --> 55:26.460]  Certainly. But that's all I should do. I'm supposed to keep it kind of simple because it's a civil infraction in the state of Oregon.
[55:26.460 --> 55:33.460]  So my argument is supposed to be minimal because the basis of the stop was illegal in the first place, so nothing else matters.
[55:33.460 --> 55:42.460]  Minimal is not your problem. Okay. Merits and avoiding them is your problem.
[55:42.460 --> 55:51.460]  Okay. Yeah, you want the motion to be as short as possible, but not so damn short that you don't make the points you need to make.
[55:51.460 --> 55:58.460]  For instance, is there any case law in Oregon that says you can't arrest for a civil infraction?
[55:58.460 --> 56:06.460]  Now, common sense says you can't do it, but if you can find case law that supports that, so much the better.
[56:06.460 --> 56:19.460]  Yeah. Search civil infraction. So may not arrest or not arrest or just arrest civil infraction Oregon.
[56:19.460 --> 56:22.460]  Do you put that in Google and see what you find?
[56:22.460 --> 56:25.460]  Civil infraction in Oregon. Okay. Civil infraction.
[56:25.460 --> 56:33.460]  And make sure you put civil infraction in double quotes so that those two word terms are linked together in the search.
[56:33.460 --> 56:39.460]  Okay. Civil infraction in Oregon. And I'm going to be looking for the statute that says it's not admissible.
[56:39.460 --> 56:43.460]  And do infraction in the singular, not the plural. Okay.
[56:43.460 --> 56:47.460]  Then it will pull back both.
[56:47.460 --> 56:54.460]  Okay. All right. We'll do all we have to modify this whole thing obviously.
[56:54.460 --> 56:59.460]  Well, let's hope so because if you follow up the way it is, you're going to get exactly what you've got so far.
[56:59.460 --> 57:05.460]  Right. Well, that's the reason why I want to verify that with you first before I do anything.
[57:05.460 --> 57:09.460]  Make the mistakes here, folks. Don't make them in the courtroom.
[57:09.460 --> 57:12.460]  Yeah, when it's too late to fix them.
[57:12.460 --> 57:27.460]  Right. Right. My second question now, on the site that you have, and I think it's at dowellaw.wordpress.com, you have some of Mark Stevens' material.
[57:27.460 --> 57:30.460]  What Mark Stevens' material do I have?
[57:30.460 --> 57:35.460]  I scroll down the page and there are some videos of Mark Stevens.
[57:35.460 --> 57:42.460]  And what he says, I don't know if you agree with this or not, but he says, always go in and enter a guilty plea on your traffic ticket.
[57:42.460 --> 57:47.460]  No, that's not what he says. And no, you don't do that.
[57:47.460 --> 57:50.460]  I heard him saying something like that on the video.
[57:50.460 --> 58:00.460]  You make a conditional plea. You offer to enter a conditional plea if the court will answer some questions for you.
[58:00.460 --> 58:11.460]  We're not going to make an offer to plea. Our rights have been violated and no plea can be had under the circumstances the way they are.
[58:11.460 --> 58:20.460]  So no, I don't believe that is correct for obvious reasons. Saying, hey, I'll enter a plea if and then they say, well, we'll just go ahead and plea for you.
[58:20.460 --> 58:24.460]  No, no, no. Wait, wait, wait, wait. I didn't refuse. You can't do that. Blah, blah, blah.
[58:24.460 --> 58:30.460]  It's a big argument. The issue here is, can you take an unconscionable plea?
[58:30.460 --> 58:35.460]  Unconscionable because my due process rights have not been protected.
[58:35.460 --> 58:40.460]  I haven't received notice. You haven't done what the law requires. You're acting entirely without jurisdiction.
[58:40.460 --> 58:44.460]  How can you enter a conditional plea with no jurisdiction?
[58:44.460 --> 58:46.460]  Hang on just a second, folks. We'll be right back.
[58:46.460 --> 58:49.460]  512-646-1984.
[58:49.460 --> 58:57.460]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.460 --> 59:06.460]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:06.460 --> 59:17.460]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.460 --> 59:27.460]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.460 --> 59:32.460]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.460 --> 59:47.460]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.460 --> 59:50.460]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.460 --> 01:00:02.460]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.460 --> 01:00:22.460]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:22.460 --> 01:00:45.460]  Markets for Monday, the 22nd of August, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,336.63 an ounce, silver $18.86 an ounce, Texas crude $47.05 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $585 U.S. currency.
[01:00:45.460 --> 01:01:01.460]  Today in history, the year 1902, the Cadillac Motor Company is founded, and in the same year, President Theodore Roosevelt becomes the first president of the United States to ride in an automobile, though it wasn't a Cadillac.
[01:01:01.460 --> 01:01:23.460]  In recent news, a U.S. District Judge Lee Yackel denied the request of three University of Texas and Austin professors to block the implementation of the state's campus carry law. The judge said that the professors had failed to establish a substantial likelihood of ultimate success on the merits of their asserted claims, which were that guns in classrooms violate free speech and equal protection rights.
[01:01:23.460 --> 01:01:51.460]  UT President Gregory Fanvez said in a written statement that the university would continue to work with faculty members concerned about the law. He added that he's committed to upholding the school's core values of academic freedom and free speech, while Attorney General Ken Paxton said that he was pleased but not surprised by the decision and that there is simply no legal justification to deny licensed, law-abiding citizens on campus the same measure of personal protection they are entitled to elsewhere in Texas.
[01:01:51.460 --> 01:02:18.460]  The Redlands Unified School District settled on and agreed to pay out $6 million to a victim of sexual abuse by one of their teachers at one of their high schools. The attorney for the victim, Vince Finaldi, stated that this is the largest child sexual abuse settlement against a public entity in U.S. history, reason being, he is saying, that the school district knew that Laura Whitehurst was sexually abusing students and did nothing about it.
[01:02:18.460 --> 01:02:38.460]  Though a spokesperson for the district obviously denies that they knew anything about the abuse, clarifying that it was just the district wanting to avoid further costly legal battles. The school district is assuring teachers and parents that the $6 million settlement will not affect its budget for teachers and other educational expenses.
[01:02:38.460 --> 01:02:54.460]  If Texas had succeeded before this year, it would have ranked third in the world in the 2016 Olympics. Texas alone took home 42 medals, 26 gold, 6 silver, and 10 bronze in the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics.
[01:02:54.460 --> 01:03:05.460]  This is Rick Rodey for your Lowdown August 22, 2016.
[01:03:05.460 --> 01:03:32.460]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:32.460 --> 01:03:36.460]  Alright, Raider, let's wrap this up.
[01:03:36.460 --> 01:03:52.460]  Alright, the only other thing I wanted to ask about was Charlie Sprinkel's methods and how he did things and I've heard in the passage you approved what he's done.
[01:03:52.460 --> 01:03:57.460]  Yeah, Charlie and I were friends. We knew each other.
[01:03:57.460 --> 01:04:11.460]  I was talking to him all the way up until the time he died of cancer back in 2010 or 2011. I forget which year it was he died. But yeah, anyway, what's the question?
[01:04:11.460 --> 01:04:16.460]  No, I'm just saying I've heard you say that in his material in the past.
[01:04:16.460 --> 01:04:24.460]  Well, he did exactly what I've been doing. He looked at the statute and said, you know what, this is all BS. It doesn't have anything at all to do with me.
[01:04:24.460 --> 01:04:29.460]  And then when they started trying to use him against them, he did what I keep telling you guys to do.
[01:04:29.460 --> 01:04:36.460]  He went after everybody all the way up to Ronald and Nancy Reagan who was governor of California at the time.
[01:04:36.460 --> 01:04:44.460]  He went after Ronald Reagan and then he also filed suit against Nancy for laundering Reagan's salary.
[01:04:44.460 --> 01:05:01.460]  Because he alleged that Reagan's salary was being corruptly stolen from the people of California by his willful failure to properly apply and uphold the laws of California within the context in which they were enacted.
[01:05:01.460 --> 01:05:06.460]  And the judges in California couldn't find a way to throw the case out.
[01:05:06.460 --> 01:05:15.460]  And they finally cut a deal with him to leave him alone if he would drop his case.
[01:05:15.460 --> 01:05:17.460]  Very good. So thumbs up for Charlie.
[01:05:17.460 --> 01:05:18.460]  Yep.
[01:05:18.460 --> 01:05:21.460]  Okay. How about Carl Lenz and Carl Miller?
[01:05:21.460 --> 01:05:28.460]  Don't care. Don't care. What they're doing right now, Carl Miller does the constitutional stuff, which is all well and good.
[01:05:28.460 --> 01:05:35.460]  But if you can find a court still upholding the damn Constitution without a gun to their head, good luck.
[01:05:35.460 --> 01:05:38.460]  All right.
[01:05:38.460 --> 01:05:39.460]  Very good.
[01:05:39.460 --> 01:05:40.460]  Okay.
[01:05:40.460 --> 01:05:41.460]  Okay.
[01:05:40.460 --> 01:05:45.460]  That's all I wanted to call in to discuss with you tonight and make those corrections to that motion.
[01:05:45.460 --> 01:05:55.460]  Get the details and specify exactly what I'm talking about in my motion to dismiss and not the motion to quash.
[01:05:55.460 --> 01:05:58.460]  Yeah. Different motion.
[01:05:58.460 --> 01:05:59.460]  Okay.
[01:05:58.460 --> 01:05:59.460]  Okay.
[01:05:59.460 --> 01:06:02.460]  I want motion to dismiss solely.
[01:06:02.460 --> 01:06:05.460]  No. You want one to suppress.
[01:06:05.460 --> 01:06:08.460]  And a motion to quash is not a motion to suppress either.
[01:06:08.460 --> 01:06:11.460]  Don't be confusing the two.
[01:06:11.460 --> 01:06:12.460]  Okay.
[01:06:12.460 --> 01:06:17.460]  Okay. Those are three different motions you're talking about.
[01:06:17.460 --> 01:06:19.460]  Okay.
[01:06:19.460 --> 01:06:21.460]  All right. I've got four weeks to work on it.
[01:06:21.460 --> 01:06:25.460]  So I wanted to get a heads up and get plenty of time in advance to be able to take care of these things.
[01:06:25.460 --> 01:06:27.460]  Okay. Good luck.
[01:06:27.460 --> 01:06:28.460]  All right. Thank you, Eddie.
[01:06:28.460 --> 01:06:29.460]  Yep.
[01:06:29.460 --> 01:06:30.460]  Talk to you again later.
[01:06:30.460 --> 01:06:31.460]  All right. Bye-bye.
[01:06:31.460 --> 01:06:34.460]  All right. Now we're going to Adam in Texas.
[01:06:34.460 --> 01:06:37.460]  Adam, what do you have?
[01:06:37.460 --> 01:06:39.460]  Can you hear me all right, Eddie?
[01:06:39.460 --> 01:06:41.460]  I can at the moment.
[01:06:41.460 --> 01:06:43.460]  I got the opposite.
[01:06:43.460 --> 01:06:46.460]  I showed up for court, but the judge didn't.
[01:06:46.460 --> 01:06:48.460]  So what do I do?
[01:06:48.460 --> 01:06:51.460]  Screw me for a loop?
[01:06:51.460 --> 01:06:54.460]  Well, did the other side show up?
[01:06:54.460 --> 01:06:55.460]  Nobody showed up.
[01:06:55.460 --> 01:06:58.460]  It's just me and the clerk.
[01:06:58.460 --> 01:07:02.460]  File a motion to dismiss, failure to prosecute.
[01:07:02.460 --> 01:07:03.460]  They had it set for trial.
[01:07:03.460 --> 01:07:07.460]  Or was it a trial or was it something else?
[01:07:07.460 --> 01:07:11.460]  Well, it's just when they told me to show up for my class E-file and only missed a year ticket.
[01:07:11.460 --> 01:07:15.460]  Okay. So this was your initial appearance on the citation?
[01:07:15.460 --> 01:07:16.460]  Yes, sir.
[01:07:16.460 --> 01:07:24.460]  Okay. Well, then right now all you do is file the same preliminary paperwork that the seminar material tells you to file.
[01:07:24.460 --> 01:07:26.460]  Okay.
[01:07:26.460 --> 01:07:33.460]  And now the thing is, is did you show up on the day in time that was on the citation?
[01:07:33.460 --> 01:07:37.460]  I was going to show up a few days earlier, but a friend convinced me.
[01:07:37.460 --> 01:07:40.460]  He said, no, no, just show up on the day.
[01:07:40.460 --> 01:07:45.460]  That way when you hit the judge with all the motions and stuff, he doesn't have any time to think about it.
[01:07:45.460 --> 01:07:48.460]  Okay. Stop listening to your friends.
[01:07:48.460 --> 01:07:51.460]  They don't know what the hell they're talking about.
[01:07:51.460 --> 01:07:56.460]  The first rule of thumb in this is you go as soon as you possibly can after getting the ticket,
[01:07:56.460 --> 01:08:02.460]  and you file the initial set of paperwork, including the affidavit of not being in transportation.
[01:08:02.460 --> 01:08:08.460]  There are several reasons, one of which I explained in this past Sunday's class about why we do this.
[01:08:08.460 --> 01:08:16.460]  But the primary reason is that you have fully complied with one of your – there are only two times under the laws in Texas
[01:08:16.460 --> 01:08:22.460]  and the rules of procedure in Texas that you can be required to appear in person before the court.
[01:08:22.460 --> 01:08:29.460]  One is in response to the promise to appear on the citation, and the other is for trial.
[01:08:29.460 --> 01:08:35.460]  Everything in between, they will not be complying with the code of criminal procedure.
[01:08:35.460 --> 01:08:40.460]  You will be using their failure to comply with the code of criminal procedure
[01:08:40.460 --> 01:08:48.460]  to deny them any ability to get you within the walls of that courtroom ever again.
[01:08:48.460 --> 01:08:51.460]  Okay?
[01:08:51.460 --> 01:08:52.460]  Right.
[01:08:52.460 --> 01:08:58.460]  Right, because when they don't follow the rules of procedure, they're violating your due process rights.
[01:08:58.460 --> 01:09:02.460]  When they violate your rights, you disqualify the judge.
[01:09:02.460 --> 01:09:11.460]  When they replace the judge and that judge fails to withdraw the rulings or orders granted by the first judge,
[01:09:11.460 --> 01:09:20.460]  you disqualify that judge, and we will stay on this merry-go-round all day long.
[01:09:20.460 --> 01:09:23.460]  Sounds cool, but I don't think – I don't know.
[01:09:23.460 --> 01:09:30.460]  I think that was the judge – it just seemed odd to me that I was the only one on a Wednesday.
[01:09:30.460 --> 01:09:33.460]  I mean, you would think usually, you know, the room is jam-packed with people.
[01:09:33.460 --> 01:09:35.460]  They've got all their tickets and stuff.
[01:09:35.460 --> 01:09:36.460]  I was the only one there.
[01:09:36.460 --> 01:09:37.460]  He wasn't there.
[01:09:37.460 --> 01:09:38.460]  I don't know.
[01:09:38.460 --> 01:09:40.460]  Maybe he was trying to do me a favor or something.
[01:09:40.460 --> 01:09:48.460]  So all I got was from the county or his clerk, just his clerk, was I asked her to make a statement,
[01:09:48.460 --> 01:09:54.460]  write it down, that I showed up, and the judge was not present, and I got her to sign it and notarize it.
[01:09:54.460 --> 01:09:56.460]  Is that pretty much all I need?
[01:09:56.460 --> 01:10:02.460]  That shows you complied with the citation, but you still need to file the paperwork.
[01:10:02.460 --> 01:10:04.460]  You fully complied.
[01:10:04.460 --> 01:10:06.460]  Do I?
[01:10:06.460 --> 01:10:09.460]  What are the chances of them trying to resurrect it?
[01:10:09.460 --> 01:10:10.460]  I mean, come on, they could –
[01:10:10.460 --> 01:10:11.460]  What do you mean, resurrect it?
[01:10:11.460 --> 01:10:13.460]  It's not like it's dead.
[01:10:13.460 --> 01:10:17.460]  They didn't die just because they didn't show up.
[01:10:17.460 --> 01:10:18.460]  So what would they do?
[01:10:18.460 --> 01:10:22.460]  They would start sending me stuff in the mail again, telling me to come again?
[01:10:22.460 --> 01:10:25.460]  Yes, that's exactly what they'll do.
[01:10:25.460 --> 01:10:26.460]  So it's like a trick?
[01:10:26.460 --> 01:10:29.460]  Yes, that's exactly what it is.
[01:10:29.460 --> 01:10:35.460]  Everything they do in these cases is intended to wear you down and make you give up and just pay.
[01:10:35.460 --> 01:10:39.460]  The more you do this, the more you're going to realize that.
[01:10:39.460 --> 01:10:41.460]  Okay.
[01:10:41.460 --> 01:10:45.460]  All right, well, I'll go down there and I'll file my – I already had the money.
[01:10:45.460 --> 01:10:46.460]  You've already been.
[01:10:46.460 --> 01:10:49.460]  You don't have to go to file anything.
[01:10:49.460 --> 01:10:53.460]  You can do all the rest of this certified mail return receipt requested.
[01:10:53.460 --> 01:10:55.460]  Oh, okay.
[01:10:55.460 --> 01:11:00.460]  But make sure you do it certified mail return receipt requested.
[01:11:00.460 --> 01:11:02.460]  Yes, right, correct.
[01:11:02.460 --> 01:11:03.460]  Always, yes.
[01:11:03.460 --> 01:11:04.460]  Okay.
[01:11:04.460 --> 01:11:09.460]  All right, well, I'll go ahead and I'll file the motions that I already have and –
[01:11:09.460 --> 01:11:11.460]  Now, let me ask you this while I've got you.
[01:11:11.460 --> 01:11:17.460]  Did you check the court record while you were there to see if anything else had been filed other than a copy of the citation?
[01:11:17.460 --> 01:11:19.460]  Of course I did.
[01:11:19.460 --> 01:11:21.460]  And what was in the record?
[01:11:21.460 --> 01:11:22.460]  Only the citation.
[01:11:22.460 --> 01:11:23.460]  Right.
[01:11:23.460 --> 01:11:25.460]  No complaint, no nothing.
[01:11:25.460 --> 01:11:31.460]  So what you're going to need to do is in a few days you're going to check the record again.
[01:11:31.460 --> 01:11:33.460]  Okay.
[01:11:33.460 --> 01:11:40.460]  From now up until you get a date for anything, you want to check that record at least once a week.
[01:11:40.460 --> 01:11:41.460]  Okay.
[01:11:41.460 --> 01:11:44.460]  The only way to check that record would be to go to the clerk, right?
[01:11:44.460 --> 01:11:51.460]  Unless you're filing PIRs each week, yes, which you can do by email.
[01:11:51.460 --> 01:11:56.460]  Well, I guess if they do try to mess with me anymore on this, which I don't think they will,
[01:11:56.460 --> 01:12:06.460]  but the clerk told me that the judge wasn't there and that I had to make a plea in order to see the judge.
[01:12:06.460 --> 01:12:07.460]  Isn't that funny?
[01:12:07.460 --> 01:12:08.460]  Yeah, that's funny.
[01:12:08.460 --> 01:12:10.460]  Did you?
[01:12:10.460 --> 01:12:11.460]  Of course not.
[01:12:11.460 --> 01:12:12.460]  Okay.
[01:12:12.460 --> 01:12:14.460]  Just making sure.
[01:12:14.460 --> 01:12:16.460]  Yeah, no, I told her, I said, that's not how the law works.
[01:12:16.460 --> 01:12:17.460]  I want to see the judge.
[01:12:17.460 --> 01:12:19.460]  Where is he?
[01:12:19.460 --> 01:12:21.460]  He just wasn't there.
[01:12:21.460 --> 01:12:22.460]  I don't know.
[01:12:22.460 --> 01:12:23.460]  It was strange.
[01:12:23.460 --> 01:12:24.460]  Okay.
[01:12:24.460 --> 01:12:31.460]  Well, the new seminar material, I'm working on documents right now to deal exactly with that issue of the clerk's demanding that people enter pleas.
[01:12:31.460 --> 01:12:36.460]  When we get done with this, they're not going to be able to keep a judge in that court ever.
[01:12:36.460 --> 01:12:38.460]  This practice needs to stop.
[01:12:38.460 --> 01:12:39.460]  It's a violation of law.
[01:12:39.460 --> 01:12:40.460]  It's a violation of rights.
[01:12:40.460 --> 01:12:45.460]  It's a delegation of judicial powers that is constitutionally abhorrent.
[01:12:45.460 --> 01:12:48.460]  This needs to stop.
[01:12:48.460 --> 01:12:57.460]  So after, I'll go file my return receipt request motions and is that pretty much all I need to do?
[01:12:57.460 --> 01:13:00.460]  You're going to file your affidavit, not engage in transportation.
[01:13:00.460 --> 01:13:06.460]  You're going to file your motion to suppress anything that the officer did.
[01:13:06.460 --> 01:13:10.460]  The officer didn't read you your rights on 38.22, right?
[01:13:10.460 --> 01:13:11.460]  No, he did not.
[01:13:11.460 --> 01:13:19.460]  Yeah, I put that in the motion to suppress that and also based on, I wasn't Miranda, Miranda versus Arizona.
[01:13:19.460 --> 01:13:20.460]  Right.
[01:13:20.460 --> 01:13:22.460]  Well, that's what 38.22 says he has to do.
[01:13:22.460 --> 01:13:25.460]  Otherwise, nothing he does is legal.
[01:13:25.460 --> 01:13:26.460]  Right.
[01:13:26.460 --> 01:13:29.460]  That's what 38.22 Code of Criminal Procedure does.
[01:13:29.460 --> 01:13:30.460]  Yeah.
[01:13:30.460 --> 01:13:38.460]  No, I went and got the motion and got them notarized and all, you know, legit and everything, and I showed up with, you know,
[01:13:38.460 --> 01:13:43.460]  a big old envelope full of paperwork and the judge wasn't there.
[01:13:43.460 --> 01:13:46.460]  But did you go ahead and file them with the clerk?
[01:13:46.460 --> 01:13:48.460]  No, because I don't know.
[01:13:48.460 --> 01:13:53.460]  I just got, I guess I got confused and I just didn't know quite what to do.
[01:13:53.460 --> 01:13:56.460]  So I drove off and I thought to myself, I said, no, this is crazy.
[01:13:56.460 --> 01:14:00.460]  So I drove back over there and I went in there and asked her to write down.
[01:14:00.460 --> 01:14:01.460]  Yeah.
[01:14:01.460 --> 01:14:06.460]  And see what you could have done, which has been just as easy, you could have also just said,
[01:14:06.460 --> 01:14:09.460]  okay, look, I've got paperwork I need to file in this case while I'm here.
[01:14:09.460 --> 01:14:10.460]  Here's your copies.
[01:14:10.460 --> 01:14:11.460]  Here's my copies.
[01:14:11.460 --> 01:14:14.460]  Stamp my copies.
[01:14:14.460 --> 01:14:17.460]  Then you had proof that you were there.
[01:14:17.460 --> 01:14:20.460]  That's all you would have had to have done since you were already there.
[01:14:20.460 --> 01:14:21.460]  Okay.
[01:14:21.460 --> 01:14:22.460]  Yeah, gotcha.
[01:14:22.460 --> 01:14:23.460]  That's expert level.
[01:14:23.460 --> 01:14:25.460]  I'm not there yet.
[01:14:25.460 --> 01:14:26.460]  Okay.
[01:14:26.460 --> 01:14:27.460]  Once you did that, you were covered.
[01:14:27.460 --> 01:14:33.460]  Anything they did after that as far as issuing a warrant for failure to appear is falsification of a government record,
[01:14:33.460 --> 01:14:37.460]  abuse of official capacity and official oppression.
[01:14:37.460 --> 01:14:41.460]  Okay.
[01:14:41.460 --> 01:14:46.460]  And once again, they can't commit crimes and stay on the bench in the case.
[01:14:46.460 --> 01:14:50.460]  So everything they do wrong that has a criminal penalty for what they're doing,
[01:14:50.460 --> 01:14:54.460]  we're going to make a criminal allegation and disqualify them.
[01:14:54.460 --> 01:14:55.460]  Okay.
[01:14:55.460 --> 01:14:56.460]  All right.
[01:14:56.460 --> 01:14:59.460]  Well, I'm going to take that advice.
[01:14:59.460 --> 01:15:01.460]  I'm going to go check the record once a week.
[01:15:01.460 --> 01:15:04.460]  If there's anything new filed in it.
[01:15:04.460 --> 01:15:06.460]  Like I said, you don't actually have to go.
[01:15:06.460 --> 01:15:10.460]  You can do a PIR only because you're not going to show up in person,
[01:15:10.460 --> 01:15:14.460]  but you could literally ask the clerk via an email,
[01:15:14.460 --> 01:15:17.460]  hey, public information request, please tell me what,
[01:15:17.460 --> 01:15:21.460]  make copies of the current contents of the file and send them over to me.
[01:15:21.460 --> 01:15:25.460]  And you can not make copies of anything that I have filed.
[01:15:25.460 --> 01:15:28.460]  I only want copies of anything that isn't mine.
[01:15:28.460 --> 01:15:33.460]  And then they'll have to make copies, put them in the email, send them to you.
[01:15:33.460 --> 01:15:35.460]  Yeah, but it's just funner going in there in person.
[01:15:35.460 --> 01:15:38.460]  If you're able to do that, like it's in the same town or something,
[01:15:38.460 --> 01:15:41.460]  by all means do that over anything else do that.
[01:15:41.460 --> 01:15:45.460]  The reason you want to do it that way is because you can go in there
[01:15:45.460 --> 01:15:48.460]  with a recorder and record the interaction.
[01:15:48.460 --> 01:15:52.460]  Because everything the clerk does that's a violation of law,
[01:15:52.460 --> 01:15:57.460]  we can use against the judge.
[01:15:57.460 --> 01:15:58.460]  Roger.
[01:15:58.460 --> 01:15:59.460]  Okay.
[01:15:59.460 --> 01:16:05.460]  So we can use what the clerk does that's illegal to disqualify the judge
[01:16:05.460 --> 01:16:11.460]  because the clerk is acting as his agent.
[01:16:11.460 --> 01:16:12.460]  Gotcha.
[01:16:12.460 --> 01:16:13.460]  All right.
[01:16:13.460 --> 01:16:15.460]  Yeah, it's all getting clearer and clearer.
[01:16:15.460 --> 01:16:20.460]  Your classes, the classes I've attended were very helpful
[01:16:20.460 --> 01:16:23.460]  and look forward to working with you again.
[01:16:23.460 --> 01:16:24.460]  But that's all I got, man.
[01:16:24.460 --> 01:16:25.460]  I'll take your time.
[01:16:25.460 --> 01:16:26.460]  All right.
[01:16:26.460 --> 01:16:27.460]  See you tonight.
[01:16:27.460 --> 01:16:28.460]  Yep.
[01:16:28.460 --> 01:16:29.460]  Bye.
[01:16:29.460 --> 01:16:30.460]  Bye-bye.
[01:16:30.460 --> 01:16:31.460]  All right.
[01:16:31.460 --> 01:16:34.460]  Now we're going to go to, well, we'll go to whoever's in line first
[01:16:34.460 --> 01:16:36.460]  when we get back after this break.
[01:16:36.460 --> 01:16:38.460]  That's who we'll go to.
[01:16:38.460 --> 01:16:41.460]  All right, folks, this is the Bunyanite Rule of Law Radio Show
[01:16:41.460 --> 01:16:47.460]  with your host Eddie Craig calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:47.460 --> 01:16:49.460]  Give us a call, get in line, got your questions,
[01:16:49.460 --> 01:16:51.460]  got your queries, complaints or whatever,
[01:16:51.460 --> 01:16:54.460]  and we'll talk about it if we get to you in time.
[01:16:54.460 --> 01:16:57.460]  We'll be right back, so y'all hang in there.
[01:17:24.460 --> 01:17:27.460]  We don't have what you're looking for, but we can find it.
[01:17:27.460 --> 01:17:29.460]  In addition, we carry popular Young Jeopardy products
[01:17:29.460 --> 01:17:32.460]  such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burps.
[01:17:32.460 --> 01:17:35.460]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods,
[01:17:35.460 --> 01:17:39.460]  Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:39.460 --> 01:17:43.460]  We broker Metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.460 --> 01:17:46.460]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:46.460 --> 01:17:49.460]  We're located at 7304 Burnet Road, Suite A,
[01:17:49.460 --> 01:17:51.460]  about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.460 --> 01:17:54.460]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.460 --> 01:18:00.460]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.460 --> 01:18:04.460]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[01:18:04.460 --> 01:18:06.460]  except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.460 --> 01:18:09.460]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves,
[01:18:09.460 --> 01:18:11.460]  and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.460 --> 01:18:14.460]  Our primary defense against aging and disease
[01:18:14.460 --> 01:18:17.460]  in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.460 --> 01:18:22.460]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:22.460 --> 01:18:25.460]  Young Jeopardy can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.460 --> 01:18:29.460]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[01:18:29.460 --> 01:18:31.460]  most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.460 --> 01:18:34.460]  We have come to trust Young Jeopardy so much,
[01:18:34.460 --> 01:18:39.460]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:39.460 --> 01:18:43.460]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com,
[01:18:43.460 --> 01:18:47.460]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.460 --> 01:18:51.460]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jeopardy, you may want to join us.
[01:18:51.460 --> 01:18:55.460]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:18:55.460 --> 01:18:58.460]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:58.460 --> 01:19:00.460]  Order now.
[01:19:00.460 --> 01:19:14.460]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:14.460 --> 01:19:20.460]  Ain't gonna blame me
[01:19:20.460 --> 01:19:27.460]  Don't blame me
[01:19:27.460 --> 01:19:32.460]  Well
[01:19:32.460 --> 01:19:34.460]  Alright, folks, we are back.
[01:19:34.460 --> 01:19:36.460]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:36.460 --> 01:19:38.460]  We got, oh, 45 minutes left in the show.
[01:19:38.460 --> 01:19:42.460]  Calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:42.460 --> 01:19:45.460]  And we are going to Richard in Louisiana.
[01:19:45.460 --> 01:19:47.460]  Richard, what can we do for you?
[01:19:47.460 --> 01:19:49.460]  Good evening, guys. Thank you for taking my call.
[01:19:49.460 --> 01:19:52.460]  I hope you can clear up some confusion.
[01:19:52.460 --> 01:19:53.460]  I'll see what I can do.
[01:19:53.460 --> 01:19:55.460]  I can't make any promises, but I'll certainly try.
[01:19:55.460 --> 01:19:57.460]  Okay, gotcha.
[01:19:57.460 --> 01:20:01.460]  So I've gone to my Louisiana laws, motor vehicles and traffic regulations,
[01:20:01.460 --> 01:20:03.460]  Revised Statute 32.
[01:20:03.460 --> 01:20:06.460]  It seems most of those are under the 32.
[01:20:06.460 --> 01:20:12.460]  And there are several places where motor vehicle is defined.
[01:20:12.460 --> 01:20:14.460]  One is under the driver's license law.
[01:20:14.460 --> 01:20:20.460]  Another one is listed under Revised Statute 32-1252 definitions.
[01:20:20.460 --> 01:20:27.460]  Then they have another one, RS 32, Section 781, use motor vehicles.
[01:20:27.460 --> 01:20:32.460]  And they're generally the same, but there's some wordplay that I hope you can help me.
[01:20:32.460 --> 01:20:35.460]  I'm confused by, and I'll just read it quickly.
[01:20:35.460 --> 01:20:40.460]  The definition of a motor vehicle means any motor-driven car, van, or truck
[01:20:40.460 --> 01:20:45.460]  required to be registered, which is used or is designed to be used
[01:20:45.460 --> 01:20:52.460]  for the transportation of passengers or goods for public, private, commercial,
[01:20:52.460 --> 01:20:53.460]  or for hire purposes.
[01:20:53.460 --> 01:20:58.460]  Now, I get the commercial and the public, which scares me as the private,
[01:20:58.460 --> 01:21:04.460]  because my Class E driver's license is a private driver's license.
[01:21:04.460 --> 01:21:07.460]  Yeah, but that's private.
[01:21:07.460 --> 01:21:10.460]  If you'll find what it means by private in that context,
[01:21:10.460 --> 01:21:12.460]  this is what I almost guarantee you will find.
[01:21:12.460 --> 01:21:16.460]  In relation to commercial and for hire, those are always performed
[01:21:16.460 --> 01:21:18.460]  by some type of carrier.
[01:21:18.460 --> 01:21:22.460]  There are two types of carrier, public and private.
[01:21:22.460 --> 01:21:27.460]  A public carrier, like a rail company, for instance,
[01:21:27.460 --> 01:21:32.460]  or a trucking company that contracts with the general public and businesses
[01:21:32.460 --> 01:21:37.460]  for the purpose of moving goods or property, is a public carrier.
[01:21:37.460 --> 01:21:38.460]  Okay?
[01:21:38.460 --> 01:21:42.460]  They have to set their, they have to cut their deals with the general public.
[01:21:42.460 --> 01:21:49.460]  A private carrier is someone who contracts only to specific closed group,
[01:21:49.460 --> 01:21:52.460]  a closed group of clients.
[01:21:52.460 --> 01:21:53.460]  I understand.
[01:21:53.460 --> 01:21:58.460]  But then the next, after that comment is they actually use the term commercial.
[01:21:58.460 --> 01:22:02.460]  Yeah, public or private, commercial or for hire.
[01:22:02.460 --> 01:22:04.460]  That's what I just said.
[01:22:04.460 --> 01:22:08.460]  Either you're a public carrier that's commercial and for hire,
[01:22:08.460 --> 01:22:11.460]  or you're a private carrier that's commercial or for hire.
[01:22:11.460 --> 01:22:14.460]  Okay, because, yeah, they use that word private
[01:22:14.460 --> 01:22:19.460]  and then give you a private driver's license, and so you, I see the trick.
[01:22:19.460 --> 01:22:23.460]  Now, another thing I wanted you to possibly help me with, Louisiana,
[01:22:23.460 --> 01:22:29.460]  is I try to track these down to, when I do go down to research the law,
[01:22:29.460 --> 01:22:34.460]  like you suggest, you go and get the actual law before you enter part of the statute.
[01:22:34.460 --> 01:22:38.460]  And we have, and I've got three options here.
[01:22:38.460 --> 01:22:42.460]  Starts off with Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development,
[01:22:42.460 --> 01:22:48.460]  which I think is a subsidiary or affiliated with the Louisiana Department of Public Safety.
[01:22:48.460 --> 01:22:50.460]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:22:50.460 --> 01:22:53.460]  Whatever you're looking at is coming from an agency.
[01:22:53.460 --> 01:22:57.460]  Agencies cannot create law, period.
[01:22:57.460 --> 01:22:59.460]  Only the state legislature can.
[01:22:59.460 --> 01:23:02.460]  When you're telling me you're reading the law,
[01:23:02.460 --> 01:23:06.460]  it has to be something enacted by the legislature.
[01:23:06.460 --> 01:23:08.460]  It won't have an agency's name on it.
[01:23:08.460 --> 01:23:11.460]  It will have the legislature's name on it.
[01:23:11.460 --> 01:23:15.460]  All right, well then, this is probably the last thing I want to ask you.
[01:23:15.460 --> 01:23:19.460]  It says, on the same Title 32, which is in the revised statute,
[01:23:19.460 --> 01:23:25.460]  Motor Vehicles and Transportation Regulation, Chapter 1, Louisiana Highway Regulatory Act.
[01:23:25.460 --> 01:23:29.460]  Now, does that get me closer to the law?
[01:23:29.460 --> 01:23:31.460]  Potentially, yeah.
[01:23:31.460 --> 01:23:37.460]  If you could find out what the original bill was that was used to create that Highway Regulatory Act,
[01:23:37.460 --> 01:23:40.460]  that original bill would be the law.
[01:23:40.460 --> 01:23:44.460]  Oh, so the act is like the statute.
[01:23:44.460 --> 01:23:46.460]  No, no, no, no, no, no.
[01:23:46.460 --> 01:23:53.460]  The act is what the legislature created and the governor signed into law.
[01:23:53.460 --> 01:23:58.460]  The statute is the agency interpretation of that act.
[01:23:58.460 --> 01:24:03.460]  Now, it uses the same title as the act, but it is not the act itself.
[01:24:03.460 --> 01:24:10.460]  It's an agency linguistic interpretation of what the law is and what it means.
[01:24:10.460 --> 01:24:11.460]  Okay?
[01:24:11.460 --> 01:24:19.460]  So that term is to convince the uneducated that the statute is the law?
[01:24:19.460 --> 01:24:24.460]  Well, I'm not going to say that it's to convince them.
[01:24:24.460 --> 01:24:30.460]  If anything, it's to inform them that this statute is based upon this act.
[01:24:30.460 --> 01:24:31.460]  Okay.
[01:24:31.460 --> 01:24:40.460]  Now, if they accept or believe or misunderstand by saying, oh, well, this is the actual law in the act, no, it's not.
[01:24:40.460 --> 01:24:45.460]  Is that the fault of the agency that the public saw it that way?
[01:24:45.460 --> 01:24:49.460]  Is that the fault of the public for not understanding how this actually works?
[01:24:49.460 --> 01:24:51.460]  Part of the public for not understanding how it works.
[01:24:51.460 --> 01:24:52.460]  Bingo.
[01:24:52.460 --> 01:24:55.460]  That's where being lazy and apathetic gets you.
[01:24:55.460 --> 01:24:56.460]  Yeah.
[01:24:56.460 --> 01:25:01.460]  Well, I can't wait to get down to the law library here and start asking questions.
[01:25:01.460 --> 01:25:09.460]  I'll bring in these specific statutes because it seems to me that when you do get the traffic stopped,
[01:25:09.460 --> 01:25:16.460]  they'll try to issue you with the initial, you know, no left turn or whatever.
[01:25:16.460 --> 01:25:20.460]  Yeah, they're going to issue the allegation against the statute, not the underlying law.
[01:25:20.460 --> 01:25:25.460]  But when you go to do your legal research down at the law library, you'd be surprised how easy this is.
[01:25:25.460 --> 01:25:29.460]  Go to one of the clerks down there that knows the library very well.
[01:25:29.460 --> 01:25:33.460]  Make friends with them because they can be extremely helpful to you.
[01:25:33.460 --> 01:25:36.460]  What you want to do is say, okay, I have this statute.
[01:25:36.460 --> 01:25:43.460]  Can you help me backtrack from this current version of the statute through the prior versions of the statute
[01:25:43.460 --> 01:25:47.460]  and the prior versions of the underlying law?
[01:25:47.460 --> 01:25:54.460]  Can you show me where the actual beginning law for this version is and help me backtrack through that as well?
[01:25:54.460 --> 01:25:56.460]  Because these things run parallel.
[01:25:56.460 --> 01:26:02.460]  For instance, here in Texas, all the actual law is from 1925.
[01:26:02.460 --> 01:26:06.460]  The 1925 law is still in full force and effect in Texas.
[01:26:06.460 --> 01:26:11.460]  All the statutory schemes must be compliant with the 1925 enactments.
[01:26:11.460 --> 01:26:15.460]  None of them are.
[01:26:15.460 --> 01:26:18.460]  Okay, Dave, this just came to mind when you said that.
[01:26:18.460 --> 01:26:22.460]  It was really with buoyant energy.
[01:26:22.460 --> 01:26:26.460]  It was the original walking tall based on that story.
[01:26:26.460 --> 01:26:34.460]  And this sheriff wanted to hassle the big shot, you know, hot shot in the town who owned the town and all the judges.
[01:26:34.460 --> 01:26:44.460]  So he went down and he cited a law that says, you know, somebody has to walk in front of your vehicle with a fog or something
[01:26:44.460 --> 01:26:52.460]  and got him on that and he read the actual law and not the statute, which I thought was fun when I saw that movie.
[01:26:52.460 --> 01:26:54.460]  All right, Dave, thank you very much, sir.
[01:26:54.460 --> 01:26:56.460]  Yes, sir.
[01:26:56.460 --> 01:26:57.460]  Okay, good night.
[01:26:57.460 --> 01:26:58.460]  Good night.
[01:26:58.460 --> 01:26:59.460]  All right.
[01:26:59.460 --> 01:27:03.460]  Now, our next caller up here is going to be Larry in Arizona.
[01:27:03.460 --> 01:27:05.460]  Larry, what can we do for you?
[01:27:05.460 --> 01:27:07.460]  Good evening, Eddie.
[01:27:07.460 --> 01:27:09.460]  I just have a couple of questions here.
[01:27:09.460 --> 01:27:11.460]  I need some terminology.
[01:27:11.460 --> 01:27:23.460]  A few months ago when I was tagged and taken to court, the officer during my stop had threatened that he would impound my vehicle if he saw it on the road again.
[01:27:23.460 --> 01:27:27.460]  Excuse me, he stopped my automobile, not my vehicle.
[01:27:27.460 --> 01:27:34.460]  And that's an obvious violation of my right to due process.
[01:27:34.460 --> 01:27:40.460]  What other terminology would I want to use for what he has done to me by threatening me with that?
[01:27:40.460 --> 01:27:43.460]  Terroristic threat.
[01:27:43.460 --> 01:27:44.460]  What's that?
[01:27:44.460 --> 01:27:45.460]  Terroristic threat.
[01:27:45.460 --> 01:27:49.460]  Deprivation of rights under color of law.
[01:27:49.460 --> 01:27:50.460]  Official oppression.
[01:27:50.460 --> 01:27:51.460]  Oh, okay.
[01:27:51.460 --> 01:27:53.460]  Official misconduct.
[01:27:53.460 --> 01:27:58.460]  Abuse of official capacity.
[01:27:58.460 --> 01:28:00.460]  That's why I called you.
[01:28:00.460 --> 01:28:02.460]  I didn't know that kind of terminology.
[01:28:02.460 --> 01:28:17.460]  Okay, now, in another show a year or so ago, you mentioned the Supreme Court has said that when they put you in jail, they can't take your fingerprints and your photos until you've been, I think you said until we've been convicted.
[01:28:17.460 --> 01:28:29.460]  There is federal, there is United States Supreme Court case law that says your fingerprints and everything are property, and they have no right to that property simply because they're booking you.
[01:28:29.460 --> 01:28:32.460]  Okay, and do you happen to know one of those cases?
[01:28:32.460 --> 01:28:37.460]  I don't know what the case side is off the top of my head, but I have a copy of it somewhere.
[01:28:37.460 --> 01:28:38.460]  Okay.
[01:28:38.460 --> 01:28:40.460]  Okay, I'll find it.
[01:28:40.460 --> 01:28:44.460]  Okay, now, okay, and Cruz Rader mentioned Charlie Sprinkle.
[01:28:44.460 --> 01:28:57.460]  I've read a lot of Charlie Sprinkle's work, and Charlie likes to sue the wives of the officers he's suing for enriching themselves.
[01:28:57.460 --> 01:29:07.460]  Well, he sues the wife for money laundering and then says she is laundering the money by enriching herself from her husband's ill-gotten gains.
[01:29:07.460 --> 01:29:08.460]  Oh, okay.
[01:29:08.460 --> 01:29:10.460]  Is that a good move?
[01:29:10.460 --> 01:29:11.460]  Absolutely.
[01:29:11.460 --> 01:29:17.460]  You will never see a HINPEC public servant just shrugging it off, will you?
[01:29:17.460 --> 01:29:30.460]  When his wife is getting dinged in court because of what he's doing that's illegal, and she can be tied to it, you think that politician is going to have peace at home?
[01:29:30.460 --> 01:29:36.460]  I agree, but like I said, I read that Charlie did it, and I just wanted to run it past you.
[01:29:36.460 --> 01:29:39.460]  Well, it actually worked very well.
[01:29:39.460 --> 01:29:47.460]  They cut a deal with him in California to leave him completely alone when it came to the transportation crap that didn't apply to him anyway.
[01:29:47.460 --> 01:29:53.460]  He even put it to the test by going by a state trooper at 95 miles an hour on the interstate.
[01:29:53.460 --> 01:29:54.460]  Hang on just a second.
[01:29:54.460 --> 01:30:00.460]  I got a break to do, and then we'll be right back.
[01:30:00.460 --> 01:30:02.460]  Be careful what you tweet.
[01:30:02.460 --> 01:30:09.460]  Just ask Jonathan Hoster. His complaint about a local grocery store sparked a national social media firestorm and nearly cost his job.
[01:30:09.460 --> 01:30:15.460]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, so I'll be back in a moment with more on the cautionary tale of tweets gone wrong.
[01:30:15.460 --> 01:30:22.460]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:22.460 --> 01:30:23.460]  That's creepy.
[01:30:23.460 --> 01:30:25.460]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:25.460 --> 01:30:28.460]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:28.460 --> 01:30:35.460]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies, and they're third party certified.
[01:30:35.460 --> 01:30:39.460]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:39.460 --> 01:30:42.460]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:42.460 --> 01:30:45.460]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:45.460 --> 01:30:53.460]  When Jonathan Hoster found the local Price Chopper supermarket under stock, he vented his frustrations on Twitter, the social media website.
[01:30:53.460 --> 01:31:03.460]  When Price Chopper PR employee Amira Setawayu read the tweet, she demanded that Hoster's employer, Syracuse University, discipline him for daring to criticize her store.
[01:31:03.460 --> 01:31:04.460]  From there it was all downhill.
[01:31:04.460 --> 01:31:09.460]  A social media professor launched blog entries criticizing the store's bizarre response.
[01:31:09.460 --> 01:31:14.460]  Bloggers debated whether heads should roll and protests were planned at Price Chopper stores.
[01:31:14.460 --> 01:31:19.460]  Price Chopper finally apologized and the disaster died down, but the outcome could have been quite different.
[01:31:19.460 --> 01:31:23.460]  Hoster could have lost his job, and I'm wondering how Setawayu kept hers.
[01:31:23.460 --> 01:31:29.460]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:29.460 --> 01:31:34.460]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001.
[01:31:34.460 --> 01:31:38.460]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:38.460 --> 01:31:42.460]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:42.460 --> 01:31:52.460]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[01:31:52.460 --> 01:31:55.460]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:55.460 --> 01:31:57.460]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[01:31:57.460 --> 01:32:00.460]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:00.460 --> 01:32:03.460]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:32:03.460 --> 01:32:09.460]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:32:09.460 --> 01:32:17.460]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant?
[01:32:17.460 --> 01:32:23.460]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:32:23.460 --> 01:32:27.460]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:32:27.460 --> 01:32:30.460]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:32:30.460 --> 01:32:38.460]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best-kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:32:38.460 --> 01:32:47.460]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:32:47.460 --> 01:32:56.460]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:32:56.460 --> 01:33:00.460]  Only at HempUSA.org.
[01:33:00.460 --> 01:33:10.460]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:31.460 --> 01:33:33.460]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:33.460 --> 01:33:35.460]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:35.460 --> 01:33:38.460]  All right, let's go back to Larry in Arizona.
[01:33:38.460 --> 01:33:41.460]  All right, Larry, please continue.
[01:33:41.460 --> 01:33:50.460]  Okay, my last question is, as I've heard you mention, and you have obviously pushed in jurisdictionary, so I've been studying jurisdictionary,
[01:33:50.460 --> 01:33:58.460]  but a while back you mentioned that jurisdictionary maybe lacks a little bit when we want to take someone into federal court.
[01:33:58.460 --> 01:34:00.460]  No, it's not lacks, it's non-existent.
[01:34:00.460 --> 01:34:03.460]  It explains going to state court very well.
[01:34:03.460 --> 01:34:08.460]  It does not in any way, shape, or form deal with the federal courts specifically,
[01:34:08.460 --> 01:34:15.460]  and it does nothing at all when it comes to a 12b6 challenge of your case in a federal court,
[01:34:15.460 --> 01:34:23.460]  nor does it in any way, shape, or form deal with anything related to criminal other than just simply helping you understand
[01:34:23.460 --> 01:34:28.460]  what the different parts of a motion actually are and how some of the procedure flow goes.
[01:34:28.460 --> 01:34:33.460]  But it deals with completely different rules under completely different circumstances,
[01:34:33.460 --> 01:34:38.460]  but it doesn't deal with anything specific to federal at all.
[01:34:38.460 --> 01:34:43.460]  And where's a good source to learn about fighting this 12b6?
[01:34:43.460 --> 01:34:47.460]  I would say finding 12b6 rebuttal motions online.
[01:34:47.460 --> 01:34:57.460]  Find the ones that were filed by the opposition stating why they're entitled to it, and then find the responses to the plaintiffs saying why they aren't.
[01:34:57.460 --> 01:35:00.460]  Okay.
[01:35:00.460 --> 01:35:02.460]  Okay, that wraps up my questions.
[01:35:02.460 --> 01:35:03.460]  Thank you very much.
[01:35:03.460 --> 01:35:04.460]  You're very welcome.
[01:35:04.460 --> 01:35:05.460]  Good luck on your search.
[01:35:05.460 --> 01:35:06.460]  Okay, thank you.
[01:35:06.460 --> 01:35:07.460]  All right, bye-bye.
[01:35:07.460 --> 01:35:10.460]  All right, now we're going to go to Ralph in Texas.
[01:35:10.460 --> 01:35:13.460]  Ralph, what can we do for you?
[01:35:13.460 --> 01:35:14.460]  Hello, Ed.
[01:35:14.460 --> 01:35:15.460]  Howdy.
[01:35:15.460 --> 01:35:20.460]  Black's Law Dictionary recognizes transportation as a commercial venture.
[01:35:20.460 --> 01:35:23.460]  Black's Law doesn't recognize anything.
[01:35:23.460 --> 01:35:26.460]  Black's Law is a dictionary.
[01:35:26.460 --> 01:35:29.460]  It is not an authoritative source.
[01:35:29.460 --> 01:35:39.460]  The case law attached to the definition in the dictionary is the authority.
[01:35:39.460 --> 01:35:40.460]  Okay.
[01:35:40.460 --> 01:35:41.460]  Okay.
[01:35:41.460 --> 01:35:53.460]  Take the case as the authority, then say as this case is used to define the term within Black's Law Sixth Edition.
[01:35:53.460 --> 01:35:55.460]  Okay.
[01:35:55.460 --> 01:36:05.460]  So I can show that I was not in commerce or under the transportation code because there's no bill of lading, et cetera.
[01:36:05.460 --> 01:36:07.460]  You've covered that many times.
[01:36:07.460 --> 01:36:08.460]  Okay?
[01:36:08.460 --> 01:36:12.460]  Okay, let's be sure we understand what we're talking about here.
[01:36:12.460 --> 01:36:17.460]  Those are the physical forms of evidence they could get to prove it, and they didn't.
[01:36:17.460 --> 01:36:19.460]  They didn't even investigate for it.
[01:36:19.460 --> 01:36:22.460]  They didn't attempt to find it because they knew it didn't exist.
[01:36:22.460 --> 01:36:37.460]  Since they knew they would never get a bill of lading, a passenger manifest, or a commercial logbook, or an admission because they knew you weren't engaging in transportation, they lacked probable costs.
[01:36:37.460 --> 01:36:41.460]  Okay.
[01:36:41.460 --> 01:36:44.460]  All right.
[01:36:44.460 --> 01:37:02.460]  So what I'm wondering and concerned about is whether or not the court that I'm suing the officer in is going to recognize the transportation code as only applying to people in commerce using the road for profit and gain.
[01:37:02.460 --> 01:37:05.460]  Well, that's the way you would have to make the argument.
[01:37:05.460 --> 01:37:11.460]  Here's why this officer has no immunity and has no authority and why my case should win.
[01:37:11.460 --> 01:37:19.460]  The transportation code regulates a commercial business occupation or business-related activity.
[01:37:19.460 --> 01:37:23.460]  It does not regulate the general public.
[01:37:23.460 --> 01:37:29.460]  And then you go through all of the individual things that we talk about on a regular basis to show why.
[01:37:29.460 --> 01:37:30.460]  Right.
[01:37:30.460 --> 01:37:32.460]  I want to use as much case law as I can.
[01:37:32.460 --> 01:37:33.460]  Right.
[01:37:33.460 --> 01:37:45.460]  So what we do is we make the argument that the Texas legislature never defined the term transportation in any law within any code anywhere, any statute within any code anywhere.
[01:37:45.460 --> 01:37:47.460]  Okay.
[01:37:47.460 --> 01:37:58.460]  So what we do then is we have to read two other things that tell us two things about Texas law, how it's constructed and how it is to be read and interpreted.
[01:37:58.460 --> 01:38:02.460]  That is chapters 311 and 312 of the government code.
[01:38:02.460 --> 01:38:25.460]  And the government code tells us that when a statute contains a term or phrase for which there is no definition, but it is a term of art, then the term of art shall have the definition as found in other law or as the industry in which that term applies has defined it.
[01:38:25.460 --> 01:38:26.460]  Okay.
[01:38:26.460 --> 01:38:28.460]  Well, then we have both in this instance.
[01:38:28.460 --> 01:38:35.460]  Both the industry and the law define transportation exactly the same way.
[01:38:35.460 --> 01:38:48.460]  The movement of person's goods or property from one place to another for compensation or hire in a business as a carrier.
[01:38:48.460 --> 01:38:49.460]  Okay.
[01:38:49.460 --> 01:38:50.460]  I hear you.
[01:38:50.460 --> 01:38:52.460]  And it sounds like I'm going to ask a stupid question.
[01:38:52.460 --> 01:38:56.460]  But you said it's not defined in Texas law.
[01:38:56.460 --> 01:39:03.460]  So you're saying that in the original 1925 enactment of the transportation code, it's not defined?
[01:39:03.460 --> 01:39:07.460]  It's not defined in any current version of the codes.
[01:39:07.460 --> 01:39:10.460]  I didn't say anything about the original law.
[01:39:10.460 --> 01:39:14.460]  The original law is not searchable the way the current codes are.
[01:39:14.460 --> 01:39:20.460]  The 1925 statutes are not online in a searchable form like they are.
[01:39:20.460 --> 01:39:34.460]  So finding a definition in those requires that you actually read the code, the whole thing, because everything in the old codes were put together piecemeal.
[01:39:34.460 --> 01:39:38.460]  They are related to the same subject or same.
[01:39:38.460 --> 01:39:47.460]  The bill could only contain one object, but it had to say what subject the object was related to.
[01:39:47.460 --> 01:39:48.460]  Okay.
[01:39:48.460 --> 01:39:55.460]  So it would define an object related to this subject in the old bill.
[01:39:55.460 --> 01:39:56.460]  Okay.
[01:39:56.460 --> 01:40:01.460]  Now they can do it by subject.
[01:40:01.460 --> 01:40:05.460]  That's why the old codes are so hard to search through.
[01:40:05.460 --> 01:40:08.460]  But no, most likely that definition isn't in there.
[01:40:08.460 --> 01:40:11.460]  If it is, hey, find it.
[01:40:11.460 --> 01:40:13.460]  That would be great.
[01:40:13.460 --> 01:40:17.460]  But what I haven't been able to is to find it.
[01:40:17.460 --> 01:40:20.460]  And I've got the PDF versions that I can't find it.
[01:40:20.460 --> 01:40:25.460]  Now granted, if the PDFs didn't translate correctly, the search wouldn't work.
[01:40:25.460 --> 01:40:32.460]  But I can't find it using a textual search of the PDFs of the 1925 statutes to show that it was ever defined.
[01:40:32.460 --> 01:40:45.460]  So we have to go to Chapter 312 of the government code, which tells us how to determine what something means when the statutes or the underlying law do not define it.
[01:40:45.460 --> 01:40:52.460]  But we also have the cases from that time period, such as Gill v.
[01:40:52.460 --> 01:40:54.460]  Okay.
[01:40:54.460 --> 01:40:58.460]  You have the cases right there in Black's law.
[01:40:58.460 --> 01:40:59.460]  That's what I just said.
[01:40:59.460 --> 01:41:05.460]  You cite the case from Black's law as the authority.
[01:41:05.460 --> 01:41:06.460]  Okay.
[01:41:06.460 --> 01:41:08.460]  You don't cite the dictionary as the authority.
[01:41:08.460 --> 01:41:11.460]  You cite the case as the authority.
[01:41:11.460 --> 01:41:12.460]  Right. Okay.
[01:41:12.460 --> 01:41:19.460]  Then all you do is shepardize the case to make sure that there hasn't been any new case law at that level that would have changed that meaning.
[01:41:19.460 --> 01:41:22.460]  And there hasn't been.
[01:41:22.460 --> 01:41:24.460]  But check it anyway.
[01:41:24.460 --> 01:41:28.460]  Shepardizing is not going to be something I can do very easily at this time.
[01:41:28.460 --> 01:41:34.460]  They're remodeling the library that I used to go to, and they're taking it out.
[01:41:34.460 --> 01:41:40.460]  There is the possibility you could go to a law library in an attorney's office.
[01:41:40.460 --> 01:41:42.460]  Okay.
[01:41:42.460 --> 01:41:45.460]  Well, I'm working on that as part of this week's project.
[01:41:45.460 --> 01:41:46.460]  Okay.
[01:41:46.460 --> 01:41:47.460]  Well, good luck with it.
[01:41:47.460 --> 01:42:02.460]  I pointed out to someone recently that the transportation code and the penal code are two different things, and both of them have crimes in them, criminal acts.
[01:42:02.460 --> 01:42:07.460]  I pointed out that the seatbelt law is in the transportation code and not the penal code.
[01:42:07.460 --> 01:42:08.460]  Correct.
[01:42:08.460 --> 01:42:13.460]  On my paper, and I can't remember, I can't find where I first read it.
[01:42:13.460 --> 01:42:15.460]  It said that this is DPS.
[01:42:15.460 --> 01:42:35.460]  The report will specify which activity was violated, and it gives three choices, traffic, penal, or I think it's something to do with school.
[01:42:35.460 --> 01:42:44.460]  So what I'm wondering is, and you did, you touched on this earlier, how can, you know, what's the difference in those?
[01:42:44.460 --> 01:42:48.460]  I mean, how many codes are there in Texas, and how many-
[01:42:48.460 --> 01:42:51.460]  There's a code for everything in Texas.
[01:42:51.460 --> 01:42:53.460]  There's a different code for everything.
[01:42:53.460 --> 01:42:58.460]  There's an occupations code, a licensing, I mean, you name it.
[01:42:58.460 --> 01:43:07.460]  But the thing about it is the penal code is the general criminal laws applicable to the public, to everyone, okay?
[01:43:07.460 --> 01:43:25.460]  The statutory codes are specialized punitive actions that can be taken against a specific class of individual that has consented to participate in the privileged activity governed by that code, hence the transportation code.
[01:43:25.460 --> 01:43:39.460]  It only applies to those that have consented and applied to engage in the privileged activity governed by that code, and is actually doing so at the time of the alleged offense from that code.
[01:43:39.460 --> 01:43:42.460]  Otherwise, the offense in the code couldn't be applied to them.
[01:43:42.460 --> 01:43:47.460]  They have to be acting under the privilege for that code to apply.
[01:43:47.460 --> 01:43:50.460]  If they're not, it doesn't apply.
[01:43:50.460 --> 01:43:52.460]  You follow?
[01:43:52.460 --> 01:43:55.460]  Hang on just a second. We'll finish this on the other side after the break.
[01:43:55.460 --> 01:43:57.460]  All right, folks, we're coming up on the last segment.
[01:43:57.460 --> 01:44:00.460]  Y'all hang in there.
[01:44:00.460 --> 01:44:05.460]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:05.460 --> 01:44:08.460]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:44:08.460 --> 01:44:14.460]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:44:14.460 --> 01:44:20.460]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:44:20.460 --> 01:44:24.460]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[01:44:24.460 --> 01:44:26.460]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:44:26.460 --> 01:44:28.460]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:44:28.460 --> 01:44:33.460]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.460 --> 01:44:38.460]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.460 --> 01:44:40.460]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:40.460 --> 01:44:49.460]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.460 --> 01:45:00.460]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:00.460 --> 01:45:03.460]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.460 --> 01:45:15.460]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.460 --> 01:45:18.460]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.460 --> 01:45:22.460]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.460 --> 01:45:27.460]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.460 --> 01:45:33.460]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.460 --> 01:45:42.460]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.460 --> 01:45:51.460]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.460 --> 01:46:13.460]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:13.460 --> 01:46:25.460]  If you could not wage any bouts of love, would your purpose have to be done?
[01:46:25.460 --> 01:46:43.460]  Such a gentleman, a soldier, a warrior of love, scuffling the keys to peace, all is taken into misunderstanding. Somebody calls the police, watching the spotlight.
[01:46:43.460 --> 01:46:49.460]  Hi, folks. We are back. We are now in the last segment of the show, and we are talking with Ralph in Texas.
[01:46:49.460 --> 01:46:51.460]  All right, Ralph, go ahead.
[01:46:51.460 --> 01:46:58.460]  Okay, I believe I've got the transportation down for now. I'll study what you've been saying and work on that.
[01:46:58.460 --> 01:47:04.460]  Now, can you give me your opinion on what's going on between the judge and myself at the present time?
[01:47:04.460 --> 01:47:14.460]  The situation is that this court has local rules, and they call those local rules general order.
[01:47:14.460 --> 01:47:15.460]  Okay.
[01:47:15.460 --> 01:47:29.460]  So this general order says that no one can bring recording devices into the court or actually into the building except for attorneys and those people with written permission.
[01:47:29.460 --> 01:47:39.460]  Now, I called and talked to a law clerk, and they said, well, just write a letter to the judge asking for written permission and say why you want it.
[01:47:39.460 --> 01:47:41.460]  So I did that.
[01:47:41.460 --> 01:47:46.460]  I kind of resented asking for permission to do something I know already have the right to do.
[01:47:46.460 --> 01:47:48.460]  Yeah, and there's another problem.
[01:47:48.460 --> 01:47:57.460]  What they're doing is drawing a distinct line between the rights of professional counsel and the rights of those acting as their own counsel.
[01:47:57.460 --> 01:48:02.460]  The attorney can go in and record his interaction with the court to back himself up.
[01:48:02.460 --> 01:48:04.460]  The pro se cannot.
[01:48:04.460 --> 01:48:11.460]  That is neither an equal application nor protection of those rules.
[01:48:11.460 --> 01:48:13.460]  Right.
[01:48:13.460 --> 01:48:21.460]  Well, what the judge did was Friday, I was at the clerk's office and got a copy of the docket.
[01:48:21.460 --> 01:48:32.460]  The judge has moved my letter I sent to him and put it over in the docket as a motion.
[01:48:32.460 --> 01:48:33.460]  Okay.
[01:48:33.460 --> 01:48:34.460]  This is just a regular letter.
[01:48:34.460 --> 01:48:38.460]  My name at the top, date in the middle, his name, and then the subject.
[01:48:38.460 --> 01:48:43.460]  What kind of, what level of court judge is this?
[01:48:43.460 --> 01:48:47.460]  Hang on just a second, Eddie.
[01:48:47.460 --> 01:48:49.460]  I got 10 minutes left on my phone.
[01:48:49.460 --> 01:48:51.460]  This is, what do you mean?
[01:48:51.460 --> 01:48:52.460]  What level of judge?
[01:48:52.460 --> 01:48:53.460]  What was the question?
[01:48:53.460 --> 01:48:55.460]  Is this a municipal, a JP?
[01:48:55.460 --> 01:48:57.460]  What kind of judge?
[01:48:57.460 --> 01:48:59.460]  This is a federal magistrate.
[01:48:59.460 --> 01:49:01.460]  A federal magistrate.
[01:49:01.460 --> 01:49:04.460]  Okay, one, we don't write letters to judges.
[01:49:04.460 --> 01:49:07.460]  Don't ever write a letter to a judge.
[01:49:07.460 --> 01:49:09.460]  Don't do that.
[01:49:09.460 --> 01:49:14.460]  Everything you do needs to be in writing, yes, but this is what they do.
[01:49:14.460 --> 01:49:19.460]  When you're asking them to do something in a court, you're moving the court.
[01:49:19.460 --> 01:49:21.460]  Therefore, you're making a motion.
[01:49:21.460 --> 01:49:29.460]  You're asking for permission that the court must consent to, so they have to set it as a motion in order to rule on it.
[01:49:29.460 --> 01:49:30.460]  Okay.
[01:49:30.460 --> 01:49:32.460]  But now here's the problem.
[01:49:32.460 --> 01:49:37.460]  Let's say that this federal judge says, no, you cannot.
[01:49:37.460 --> 01:49:53.460]  Then you can object to the judge's ruling, stating, can the court please satisfy the question of why professional bar-card carrying a counsel is authorized by default to bring recording equipment in for their cases,
[01:49:53.460 --> 01:50:05.460]  but those who are acting on their own behalf as their own counsel are forbidden the same protection of recording their interaction with this court.
[01:50:05.460 --> 01:50:11.460]  I guarantee you we're going to have a pop-goes-the-weasel moment here.
[01:50:11.460 --> 01:50:24.460]  Well, yeah, I mean, I'm thinking of a lot of different things. One is how does the judge have the authority?
[01:50:24.460 --> 01:50:27.460]  Now, remember, this judge did not sign this order.
[01:50:27.460 --> 01:50:33.460]  These are general orders that have been written by various judges through the years.
[01:50:33.460 --> 01:50:34.460]  Right.
[01:50:34.460 --> 01:50:43.460]  How does any judge make that order and any judge enforce that order on the general public?
[01:50:43.460 --> 01:50:45.460]  They don't have jurisdiction over it.
[01:50:45.460 --> 01:50:52.460]  If I walk into the federal building to look at something in the clerk's office, they don't have jurisdiction over me.
[01:50:52.460 --> 01:50:59.460]  So how can their law, their rule, their order, general or local, whatever, have any force and effect on me?
[01:50:59.460 --> 01:51:04.460]  Well, technically speaking, it can't. Technically speaking, it can't.
[01:51:04.460 --> 01:51:06.460]  But here's the problem.
[01:51:06.460 --> 01:51:20.460]  You've got a local rule of federal court, which is in direct conflict with the United States Supreme Court decision on the public's right to record their public servants in their public capacities,
[01:51:20.460 --> 01:51:27.460]  performing their public duties in a public place, which a courtroom is.
[01:51:27.460 --> 01:51:31.460]  The court has, the public has the right to access that court.
[01:51:31.460 --> 01:51:44.460]  Well, I read that case or read one of them and it said that in the courtroom there are limits because there could be a minor, a minor case with a minor child going on.
[01:51:44.460 --> 01:51:45.460]  That's true.
[01:51:45.460 --> 01:51:53.460]  But those limits would have to be stated ahead of time so that the public would know why they're not allowed to go in there with the recording equipment.
[01:51:53.460 --> 01:52:06.460]  It's not like they could just make a blanket statement that unless we say so, you can't do this because then they're not doing it under the limited conditions the Supreme Court is speaking of.
[01:52:06.460 --> 01:52:11.460]  They're doing it by default to everything.
[01:52:11.460 --> 01:52:12.460]  You see the problem with that?
[01:52:12.460 --> 01:52:31.460]  Yeah, I do, but I'm just afraid they're going to stonewall me, you know, and after what happened with the Hartman-Walker case, you know, I'm just, you know, a little bit, I don't know, a little bit nervous about being around any of them without a recording device.
[01:52:31.460 --> 01:52:36.460]  I don't want to, I don't want to talk to them without witnesses or a recording device.
[01:52:36.460 --> 01:52:38.460]  Well, I agree.
[01:52:38.460 --> 01:52:40.460]  I agree.
[01:52:40.460 --> 01:52:48.460]  The problem is, is in any of the federal courts you have to go through a mental detector before you can get anywhere, even to the clerk.
[01:52:48.460 --> 01:52:53.460]  Well, I'm going to take an old reporter in and let them confiscate it because that's what they say they're going to do and that way I'll have damages.
[01:52:53.460 --> 01:52:55.460]  That's also possible.
[01:52:55.460 --> 01:52:57.460]  At least they'd give you somebody to sue.
[01:52:57.460 --> 01:53:00.460]  They don't say they'll arrest you.
[01:53:00.460 --> 01:53:04.460]  They just say you may have the items confiscated.
[01:53:04.460 --> 01:53:09.460]  Yeah, but they also may just throw you out of the building instead and say you can't come back as long as you have them.
[01:53:09.460 --> 01:53:12.460]  They may come back as long as you have them.
[01:53:12.460 --> 01:53:15.460]  Yeah, I thought about that too.
[01:53:15.460 --> 01:53:27.460]  So what you're suggesting there or what you're considering thinking is that just leave it as a motion and then just do a brief saying that, hey, he doesn't have this authority?
[01:53:27.460 --> 01:53:30.460]  No, make the argument the way we've made it.
[01:53:30.460 --> 01:53:40.460]  Your local rule appears to be in conflict with United States Supreme Court case law, GLIC, versus I forget what the other is, but there's several of them right now.
[01:53:40.460 --> 01:53:47.460]  There are several standing United States Supreme Court cases on the right to record public servants performing their public duties in a public place.
[01:53:47.460 --> 01:53:59.460]  And yes, there are limitations on what you can do in a court, but a blanket statement by every court saying you can't record without our permission isn't limiting that application to those types of cases.
[01:53:59.460 --> 01:54:06.460]  That is basically doing the approach of ban everything and then selectively allow them in.
[01:54:06.460 --> 01:54:22.460]  But if they rule against you by setting a default that the bar card carrying attorneys can bring them in, but the public can't, then we're not getting an equal application and protection of that local rule.
[01:54:22.460 --> 01:54:25.460]  And that's exactly what that local rule says.
[01:54:25.460 --> 01:54:29.460]  Attorneys can, the rest of us can't unless we have written permission.
[01:54:29.460 --> 01:54:46.460]  Yeah, and that right there, that's an issue because you're in a public forum, a controlled public forum agreed, but still not one where if the judge is doing what the law requires, that he should be afraid of getting recorded.
[01:54:46.460 --> 01:54:52.460]  But the problem is, is they're not doing what the law requires.
[01:54:52.460 --> 01:54:56.460]  That's exactly why they don't want them in there.
[01:54:56.460 --> 01:54:58.460]  Yes, exactly.
[01:54:58.460 --> 01:55:10.460]  I mean, let's look at that judge that sat in that courtroom while the municipal police officers acting as court bailiffs assaulted that woman sexually in another room.
[01:55:10.460 --> 01:55:31.460]  And then when she started pleading with the judge about the assault, the two officers assaulted her again physically in the courtroom and threw her in jail while the judge turned her back on them and sat up there and played with the woman's daughter and ignored the illegal actions of these officers in this courtroom.
[01:55:31.460 --> 01:55:47.460]  Without that camera rolling in that courtroom, that woman would have never been able to defend herself against those charges in which that judge was completely complicit in the illegal activities those cops did in that courtroom.
[01:55:47.460 --> 01:55:50.460]  Without that camera, no one would have known.
[01:55:50.460 --> 01:55:54.460]  This is why they don't want them in that courtroom.
[01:55:54.460 --> 01:55:58.460]  This is exactly why.
[01:55:58.460 --> 01:56:06.460]  Well, now, the fact that a court reporter can go in there, I can hire a court reporter if I have the money to go in there.
[01:56:06.460 --> 01:56:12.460]  That also proves the point that if the public...
[01:56:12.460 --> 01:56:17.460]  Well, the thing is, you hire a court reporter, the judge is going to say, who are you and what are you doing?
[01:56:17.460 --> 01:56:18.460]  Well, I'm a court reporter.
[01:56:18.460 --> 01:56:19.460]  Well, you're not my court reporter.
[01:56:19.460 --> 01:56:20.460]  My court reporter is right here.
[01:56:20.460 --> 01:56:21.460]  Who are you?
[01:56:21.460 --> 01:56:26.460]  Well, I was paid by one of the people out here in the gallery to sit here and do this.
[01:56:26.460 --> 01:56:28.460]  Well, sorry, you're not going to get to do it.
[01:56:28.460 --> 01:56:29.460]  Get out of here.
[01:56:29.460 --> 01:56:32.460]  I've seen them do it.
[01:56:32.460 --> 01:56:35.460]  Well, I don't know if they're doing it in the federal court.
[01:56:35.460 --> 01:56:40.460]  I've called several court reporters and they seem to not have a problem with it.
[01:56:40.460 --> 01:56:45.460]  Well, yeah, but did you tell them I don't specifically have a case in this court?
[01:56:45.460 --> 01:56:49.460]  I want you to sit back here with me and just record it anyway.
[01:56:49.460 --> 01:56:50.460]  Did you tell them that?
[01:56:50.460 --> 01:56:53.460]  I was talking about in my case.
[01:56:53.460 --> 01:56:55.460]  I called to find out how much they charge.
[01:56:55.460 --> 01:56:58.460]  Well, that's exactly different from what I'm saying, though.
[01:56:58.460 --> 01:57:04.460]  What I'm saying is if you don't have a case and you do that, the judge is going to kick them out.
[01:57:04.460 --> 01:57:09.460]  He might do it anyway, but you can see.
[01:57:09.460 --> 01:57:10.460]  Okay.
[01:57:10.460 --> 01:57:13.460]  Well, good stuff I can work with.
[01:57:13.460 --> 01:57:14.460]  Appreciate it again, Eddie.
[01:57:14.460 --> 01:57:15.460]  Yes, sir.
[01:57:15.460 --> 01:57:16.460]  No problem.
[01:57:16.460 --> 01:57:17.460]  You have a great evening.
[01:57:17.460 --> 01:57:18.460]  You, too.
[01:57:18.460 --> 01:57:19.460]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:57:19.460 --> 01:57:20.460]  All right.
[01:57:20.460 --> 01:57:21.460]  I don't know if I've got time for this.
[01:57:21.460 --> 01:57:25.460]  Charles in Washington, I can give you one minute.
[01:57:25.460 --> 01:57:26.460]  Good, Eddie.
[01:57:26.460 --> 01:57:28.460]  Hey, I ended up trying to call you.
[01:57:28.460 --> 01:57:30.460]  I'll try to email you again.
[01:57:30.460 --> 01:57:33.460]  I'm the one that had those tickets that was on the toll card.
[01:57:33.460 --> 01:57:34.460]  Yeah.
[01:57:34.460 --> 01:57:36.460]  I went to court the other day.
[01:57:36.460 --> 01:57:41.460]  They ruled against me based upon that 45 days over expiration date.
[01:57:41.460 --> 01:57:51.460]  But I read some things I read up to you about the, did you file a solid cause of action?
[01:57:51.460 --> 01:57:57.460]  And I asked them about indictment papers, but you also were not purchased because the ticket is a suit.
[01:57:57.460 --> 01:57:59.460]  None of that stuff works in court.
[01:57:59.460 --> 01:58:02.460]  I'm sure that's the way I did well.
[01:58:02.460 --> 01:58:05.460]  The officer doesn't file causes of action.
[01:58:05.460 --> 01:58:07.460]  That's problem number one.
[01:58:07.460 --> 01:58:10.460]  He can't testify to something he didn't do.
[01:58:10.460 --> 01:58:18.460]  The prosecutor is the one that's required to file the document based upon the statements and complaints made by the officer.
[01:58:18.460 --> 01:58:19.460]  Okay.
[01:58:19.460 --> 01:58:21.460]  That's why that doesn't work.
[01:58:21.460 --> 01:58:22.460]  All right, Charles.
[01:58:22.460 --> 01:58:24.460]  Send me an email and I'll see what I can get to.
[01:58:24.460 --> 01:58:29.460]  But man, I am really under the gun on time here, so I will get to it as quick as I can.
[01:58:29.460 --> 01:58:30.460]  Okay. I know you are.
[01:58:30.460 --> 01:58:31.460]  Go ahead.
[01:58:31.460 --> 01:58:32.460]  All right.
[01:58:32.460 --> 01:58:33.460]  All right, folks.
[01:58:33.460 --> 01:58:35.460]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:35.460 --> 01:58:38.460]  Thank you for all the callers and the listeners that we have out there.
[01:58:38.460 --> 01:58:43.460]  Please keep the network and myself in your financial prayers and donations whenever you can.
[01:58:43.460 --> 01:58:45.460]  Keep us on the air and keep us working for you.
[01:58:45.460 --> 01:58:49.460]  You all have a great week, good night, and God bless.
[01:58:49.460 --> 01:58:57.460]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.460 --> 01:59:04.460]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.460 --> 01:59:08.460]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.460 --> 01:59:11.460]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.460 --> 01:59:20.460]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.460 --> 01:59:25.460]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:25.460 --> 01:59:30.460]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.460 --> 01:59:32.460]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.460 --> 01:59:40.460]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.460 --> 01:59:49.460]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.460 --> 02:00:02.460]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.