[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli
[00:08.000 --> 00:10.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:10.000 --> 00:23.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.000 --> 00:29.000]  The markets for Wednesday the 17th of August 2016 are currently trading with gold at $1,349.35
[00:29.000 --> 00:36.000]  an ounce, silver $19.68 an ounce, Texas crude $46.58 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:36.000 --> 00:45.000]  sitting at about $572 U.S. currency.
[00:45.000 --> 00:52.000]  Today in history, the year 1982, the first compact discs or CDs are released in public in Germany.
[00:52.000 --> 00:57.000]  It was a recording from 1979 of Claudio Arau performing Chopin's waltzes.
[00:57.000 --> 01:04.000]  He was invited to the Langenhagen plant to press the start button.
[01:04.000 --> 01:09.000]  In recent news, U.S. District Judge Ann J. Brown sentenced Cory LaCueu, the first defendant
[01:09.000 --> 01:14.000]  from the armed takeover in the Oregon wildlife refuge earlier this year, to a two-and-a-half-year
[01:14.000 --> 01:16.000]  prison sentence for his role in the federal conspiracy case.
[01:16.000 --> 01:21.000]  He will also have a three-year supervised release afterwards and an amount of restitution be paid
[01:21.000 --> 01:24.000]  when that amount is determined in the future.
[01:24.000 --> 01:28.000]  Cory was the first of 26 standoff defendants who pleaded guilty to the armed conspiracy.
[01:28.000 --> 01:32.000]  Though conspiracy charges usually carry a prison sentence of up to six years,
[01:32.000 --> 01:36.000]  federal prosecutors settled for less as part of the plea bargain agreement
[01:36.000 --> 01:44.000]  since Cory was the first in the case to take responsibility.
[01:44.000 --> 01:48.000]  Donald Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, was set to receive an intelligence briefing
[01:48.000 --> 01:49.000]  in New York today.
[01:49.000 --> 01:53.000]  The intent is to give him an inside scoop into the global threats that the U.S. is facing,
[01:53.000 --> 01:55.000]  a standard procedure for major party candidates.
[01:55.000 --> 02:00.000]  The briefing does not contain sensitive intelligence, not at the level of the presidential daily briefing,
[02:00.000 --> 02:05.000]  for example, but more akin to the broad and descriptive testimony given by senior officials
[02:05.000 --> 02:09.000]  to Congress each year at a public hearing on global threats.
[02:09.000 --> 02:13.000]  Trump brought along General Mike Flynn, former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency,
[02:13.000 --> 02:16.000]  since the candidates are not required to hold security clearances,
[02:16.000 --> 02:19.000]  but any aid in the room with them does.
[02:19.000 --> 02:22.000]  For the first 52 years of presidential candidate intelligence briefings,
[02:22.000 --> 02:24.000]  the CIA gave them directly.
[02:24.000 --> 02:27.000]  However, since 2004, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence
[02:27.000 --> 02:29.000]  has now taken over this task.
[02:29.000 --> 02:33.000]  The session includes a printed briefing book for each candidate.
[02:33.000 --> 03:01.000]  This is Rick Brody with your Lowdown for August 17, 2016.
[03:01.000 --> 03:16.000]  Music
[03:16.000 --> 03:19.000]  Really, man, come on
[03:19.000 --> 03:23.000]  Six o'clock news says somebody been shot
[03:23.000 --> 03:25.000]  Somebody's been abused
[03:25.000 --> 03:27.000]  Somebody blew up a building
[03:27.000 --> 03:29.000]  Somebody stole their car
[03:29.000 --> 03:31.000]  Somebody got away
[03:31.000 --> 03:33.000]  Somebody didn't get too far
[03:33.000 --> 03:39.000]  Yeah, they didn't get too far
[03:39.000 --> 03:43.000]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day, son
[03:43.000 --> 03:47.000]  A man had the answer for the weed that he dug
[03:47.000 --> 03:51.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree
[03:51.000 --> 03:53.000]  Round up all of them dead boys
[03:53.000 --> 04:01.000]  Hang a mile up the street for all the people to see
[04:01.000 --> 04:05.000]  That justice is the one thing you should always find
[04:05.000 --> 04:07.000]  You gotta settle up your boys
[04:07.000 --> 04:09.000]  You gotta draw a hard line
[04:09.000 --> 04:11.000]  When the guns won't settle
[04:11.000 --> 04:13.000]  We'll sing a victory tune
[04:13.000 --> 04:17.000]  And we'll all meet back at the horse's hooves
[04:17.000 --> 04:22.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing
[04:22.000 --> 04:27.000]  Let's give for my men before my horses
[04:27.000 --> 04:32.000]  Music
[04:32.000 --> 04:34.000]  Alright, folks, good evening.
[04:34.000 --> 04:37.000]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig.
[04:37.000 --> 04:40.000]  It is August 22, 2016.
[04:40.000 --> 04:46.000]  It is coming up on the end of the month for you WoW players.
[04:46.000 --> 04:51.000]  I know you're going to love that because your new Legion add-on gets to kick in at the end of the month
[04:51.000 --> 04:53.000]  just a small bit of it you have now.
[04:53.000 --> 04:59.000]  And on top of that, it puts us that much closer to the release date for the movie, which is in October.
[04:59.000 --> 05:01.000]  I don't have a specific date yet.
[05:01.000 --> 05:03.000]  I just know it's supposed to be in October.
[05:03.000 --> 05:07.000]  When I get a specific date, I will be sure and let everybody know.
[05:07.000 --> 05:08.000]  I'll announce it on the show.
[05:08.000 --> 05:09.000]  I'll put it up on the blog.
[05:09.000 --> 05:11.000]  I'll do all of the above.
[05:11.000 --> 05:14.000]  But in the meantime, please look forward to seeing it.
[05:14.000 --> 05:20.000]  And we're going to try to get it released in all the same movies where the Nest of Susan movies are all released.
[05:20.000 --> 05:22.000]  It's being put out by the same company.
[05:22.000 --> 05:26.000]  So we should be in pretty much all the same theaters worldwide.
[05:26.000 --> 05:28.000]  That's going to be a good thing.
[05:28.000 --> 05:33.000]  It will get a lot of information out there in the hands of folks and hopefully do some good,
[05:33.000 --> 05:35.000]  especially coming out right before the elections.
[05:35.000 --> 05:38.000]  Like I said, they've got enough footage shot in this thing.
[05:38.000 --> 05:42.000]  They could probably do two or three sequels just on information alone.
[05:42.000 --> 05:44.000]  But we'll see how that goes.
[05:44.000 --> 05:48.000]  And we're also going to see about another potential collaborative project,
[05:48.000 --> 05:54.000]  which I am not at this point in time able to disclose any of the details of.
[05:54.000 --> 05:58.000]  But let's just say that if that project actually goes forward,
[05:58.000 --> 06:04.000]  you're going to be one happy bunch of campers out there to go see this one because it's going to do something
[06:04.000 --> 06:09.000]  nothing else has ever done in the subject matter area we're going to be dealing with.
[06:09.000 --> 06:10.000]  All right.
[06:10.000 --> 06:13.000]  That being said, there are a few things I wanted to go over tonight,
[06:13.000 --> 06:18.000]  beginning with these cases that we have in these justice and municipal courts
[06:18.000 --> 06:26.000]  and the complete lack of competency and total disregard for the rule of law
[06:26.000 --> 06:30.000]  and the rules of procedure under which they're supposed to operate.
[06:30.000 --> 06:34.000]  From this point forward, once the rewrite of the seminar material is done,
[06:34.000 --> 06:39.000]  we're going to be continuously, almost guaranteed continuously,
[06:39.000 --> 06:44.000]  disqualifying any and all judges that plant their butts in those chairs.
[06:44.000 --> 06:48.000]  It's not going to be hard to do, and it's not going to be unreasonable to do
[06:48.000 --> 06:55.000]  because every single one of them is going to do exactly the same set of things wrong, guaranteed.
[06:55.000 --> 07:02.000]  The rule of thumb is that we are entitled to due process at any stage of any proceeding
[07:02.000 --> 07:08.000]  in a prosecution against us for a criminal act or any alleged criminal act.
[07:08.000 --> 07:14.000]  Now, a crime by common law definition is not even close to the crap they're calling crimes today
[07:14.000 --> 07:17.000]  where there are no victims, there is no intent, there's nothing.
[07:17.000 --> 07:24.000]  What we refer to as malum prohibitum, okay, or because we said so law.
[07:24.000 --> 07:29.000]  Those are not supposed to be things that are used against the people anywhere for any reason
[07:29.000 --> 07:37.000]  because we're not operating under a regulable privilege that the state has any power to make law over.
[07:37.000 --> 07:40.000]  That's the first place where this stuff goes completely south.
[07:40.000 --> 07:44.000]  They have no authority to regulate us in our private activities.
[07:44.000 --> 07:48.000]  And regardless of what some of these so-called attorneys want you to believe, to the contrary,
[07:48.000 --> 07:55.000]  that you have to give up certain rights to live in society and everything else, that's absolute baloney.
[07:55.000 --> 08:04.000]  You do not give up your rights, okay, ever, any of them, for any reason, at least not against your will.
[08:04.000 --> 08:09.000]  You can voluntarily cease to exercise them, but they can't be taken away from you
[08:09.000 --> 08:17.000]  by any of the means the state would like you to believe, which is via administrative regulation.
[08:17.000 --> 08:23.000]  What is supposed to happen is that we are supposed to be self-governing in that regard.
[08:23.000 --> 08:30.000]  In other words, I know I have the right to stand with my arms out and swing my fists in a circle, all right?
[08:30.000 --> 08:36.000]  I have every right to do that, regardless of where I am, whether I'm living in town, out of town,
[08:36.000 --> 08:38.000]  into society, or all alone.
[08:38.000 --> 08:39.000]  It makes no difference.
[08:39.000 --> 08:41.000]  I have every right to do that.
[08:41.000 --> 08:47.000]  What I do not have the right to do is do that in a time and place and manner
[08:47.000 --> 08:54.000]  that would recklessly endanger or harm another individual or their rights.
[08:54.000 --> 09:02.000]  In other words, I can't spin in a circle swinging my fist and hit someone, okay?
[09:02.000 --> 09:10.000]  I'm not allowed to do that simply because that would be me exercising my right in a way that would cause them harm, all right?
[09:10.000 --> 09:13.000]  But that is a self-governing choice not to do.
[09:13.000 --> 09:18.000]  If I did do it anyway, then I have to suffer the consequences for those actions.
[09:18.000 --> 09:20.000]  It's that simple.
[09:20.000 --> 09:25.000]  The government doesn't get to say, I can't do it, but the government can say,
[09:25.000 --> 09:32.000]  if you harm somebody else because you did it, then we have the power to make you answer for it.
[09:32.000 --> 09:36.000]  That's all the power they're supposed to have over us.
[09:36.000 --> 09:45.000]  And in these lower courts, not only are they using these statutes against the population in a way that they're not intended to be used,
[09:45.000 --> 09:51.000]  nor are they in any way related to the activity that the general public is engaging in,
[09:51.000 --> 09:59.000]  they're treating us all as if these regulations have power over our lives and our activities when they don't.
[09:59.000 --> 10:10.000]  Now, one of our fundamental rights that we have in any prosecution of a case of a criminal nature is to know the nature and cause.
[10:10.000 --> 10:16.000]  The government has to tell us what the nature and cause against us is.
[10:16.000 --> 10:20.000]  We have every right to know that.
[10:20.000 --> 10:28.000]  Yet you put in a motion to a court or a demand to a court to be informed of the nature and cause, they completely ignore it.
[10:28.000 --> 10:31.000]  They act as if you never filed the paperwork.
[10:31.000 --> 10:42.000]  And no matter what paperwork you do file, the prosecuting attorney acts as if they don't have a duty or an obligation of any kind to rebut any arguments made in that,
[10:42.000 --> 10:52.000]  that they can just gloss right over it as if nothing you wrote matters and proceed as if you didn't file a damn thing.
[10:52.000 --> 10:56.000]  So as you can see, it's a very one-sided system.
[10:56.000 --> 10:59.000]  But let's get to the issue of demanding a nature and cause here.
[10:59.000 --> 11:07.000]  I've been doing some reading today along with some writing and getting some information collected for the redo of documents in the new setup on the seminar material.
[11:07.000 --> 11:14.000]  And there's something I want you to see or at least hear in this particular case.
[11:14.000 --> 11:25.000]  Now, if you do a search through the Texas statutes for two terms, one is criminal activity and the other is crime,
[11:25.000 --> 11:30.000]  you're going to get three hits on that.
[11:30.000 --> 11:33.000]  And this is what they will be.
[11:33.000 --> 11:40.000]  They will be one under Title VII of the Penal Code, Offenses Against Property, and in this particular case, Chapter 34, Money Laundering,
[11:40.000 --> 11:45.000]  where it has the definition of criminal activity written this way.
[11:45.000 --> 11:56.000]  Any offense, including any preparatory offense that is A, classified as a felony under the laws of this state or the United States,
[11:56.000 --> 12:04.000]  or B, punishable by confinement for more than one year under the laws of another state.
[12:04.000 --> 12:06.000]  All right, so understand this.
[12:06.000 --> 12:12.000]  That is the definition of criminal activity, okay, at least in relation to money laundering.
[12:12.000 --> 12:16.000]  But it's also one of the only places in Texas law where it's defined.
[12:16.000 --> 12:21.000]  There is one other, and that you're going to find over in the Code of Criminal Procedure, all right,
[12:21.000 --> 12:30.000]  under Chapter 61 definitions, which is compilation of information pertaining to criminal combinations and criminal street gangs.
[12:30.000 --> 12:38.000]  Over here, the definition of criminal activity means conduct that is subject to prosecution.
[12:38.000 --> 12:44.000]  Now, here it says the definition for criminal activity in this regard is limited to this chapter,
[12:44.000 --> 12:52.000]  this chapter being Chapter 61, compilation of information pertaining to criminal combinations and criminal street gangs.
[12:52.000 --> 12:58.000]  All right, so this definition, meaning conduct that is subject to prosecution,
[12:58.000 --> 13:03.000]  can't be charged against the general public for, say, a transportation offense,
[13:03.000 --> 13:09.000]  because here the scope of this is specifically limited to this chapter and relating to these particular subjects,
[13:09.000 --> 13:12.000]  criminal combinations and criminal street gangs.
[13:12.000 --> 13:19.000]  When you go back over to the penal code, same thing could be applied there where it says in this chapter criminal activity means this.
[13:19.000 --> 13:23.000]  That criminal activity definition relates strictly to money laundering.
[13:23.000 --> 13:32.000]  But there, that one says that it has to be a felony under the laws of this state or punishable by confinement
[13:32.000 --> 13:38.000]  under the laws of another, more than one year no less, under the laws of another state.
[13:38.000 --> 13:43.000]  It doesn't say anything about it being punishable under the laws of this state for more than one year.
[13:43.000 --> 13:46.000]  It says of another state.
[13:46.000 --> 13:53.000]  So by this definition, criminal activity would not include any Class B misdemeanor, for instance,
[13:53.000 --> 13:57.000]  or a Class A misdemeanor, for instance,
[13:57.000 --> 14:03.000]  because neither one of those can involve incarceration in excess of a year.
[14:03.000 --> 14:04.000]  Okay?
[14:04.000 --> 14:14.000]  It's a year max for a Class A, it's a six month max for a Class B, and it's zero for a Class C.
[14:14.000 --> 14:23.000]  So if we make the argument that neither one of these criminal activity definitions apply in relation to a transportation offense,
[14:23.000 --> 14:31.000]  then we have another issue to address, and that is how are they defining these so-called criminal misdemeanors
[14:31.000 --> 14:38.000]  under the transportation code or any other regulatory code for that matter as crimes
[14:38.000 --> 14:45.000]  when incarceration cannot be a part of the punishment and they don't constitute a felony or a breach of the peace,
[14:45.000 --> 14:50.000]  which under common law understanding was always the only form of crime there was.
[14:50.000 --> 14:54.000]  Okay? That what you did had to constitute, especially when it came to warrantless arrest,
[14:54.000 --> 14:59.000]  it had to constitute a felony or it had to constitute a breach of the peace.
[14:59.000 --> 15:00.000]  Okay?
[15:00.000 --> 15:03.000]  That was the criteria for arresting without a warrant.
[15:03.000 --> 15:09.000]  Nowadays they want to say that they can do it because they write a special statute for it,
[15:09.000 --> 15:14.000]  like they did in the transportation code under 543.001.
[15:14.000 --> 15:23.000]  Now we have a constitutional prohibition against warrantless searches and seizures when they're unreasonable.
[15:23.000 --> 15:24.000]  Okay?
[15:24.000 --> 15:35.000]  Now we have to understand that unreasonable doesn't necessarily mean what everybody is trying to make you believe that it means.
[15:35.000 --> 15:39.000]  And I want to cover that on the other side of the break because I've got to pull some information up,
[15:39.000 --> 15:43.000]  and I've only got like a minute and a half left before the break in this one.
[15:43.000 --> 15:48.000]  So on the other side I'm going to get into reasonable with you.
[15:48.000 --> 15:49.000]  Okay?
[15:49.000 --> 15:55.000]  And try to help you understand why the stuff they're using in the transportation code
[15:55.000 --> 16:06.000]  and the other regulatory codes for Class Cs to make a warrantless arrest power for these officers is inherently unreasonable.
[16:06.000 --> 16:07.000]  Okay?
[16:07.000 --> 16:09.000]  Now keep that in mind.
[16:09.000 --> 16:14.000]  They must have a reasonable cause to arrest without a warrant,
[16:14.000 --> 16:18.000]  which under common law was always a felony or a breach of the peace.
[16:18.000 --> 16:25.000]  In fact, it was written into the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure under 14.01A that way for the longest period of time.
[16:25.000 --> 16:32.000]  If you were going to arrest somebody without a warrant, then it had to be for a felony or a breach of the peace.
[16:32.000 --> 16:34.000]  It couldn't just be because.
[16:34.000 --> 16:36.000]  All right?
[16:36.000 --> 16:43.000]  So we'll cover that on the other side of the break here, what is reasonable in the history of law here.
[16:43.000 --> 16:44.000]  Okay?
[16:44.000 --> 16:47.000]  So y'all hang on and we'll be right back after this break.
[16:47.000 --> 16:52.000]  And I do not have the phones turned on yet, so if you're not able to get in, that's why.
[16:52.000 --> 16:54.000]  There's nothing wrong with the board and we are live,
[16:54.000 --> 16:57.000]  but you're going to have to wait for me to turn the phones on and start calling in.
[16:57.000 --> 17:00.000]  We'll be right back, so hang in there.
[17:00.000 --> 17:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.000 --> 17:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.000 --> 17:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.000 --> 17:22.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[17:22.000 --> 17:25.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.000 --> 17:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:31.000 --> 17:34.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much,
[17:34.000 --> 17:40.000]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:40.000 --> 17:43.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[17:43.000 --> 17:47.000]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:47.000 --> 17:51.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.000 --> 17:58.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:58.000 --> 18:00.000]  Order now.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:14.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too.
[18:14.000 --> 18:20.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:20.000 --> 18:24.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[18:24.000 --> 18:26.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:26.000 --> 18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 19:00.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-m at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.000 --> 19:23.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradio.com.
[19:23.000 --> 19:38.000]  Thank you very much.
[19:53.000 --> 20:13.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[20:13.000 --> 20:15.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[20:15.000 --> 20:24.000]  All right, now as to reasonable, this is the way reasonable is defined in Bouvier's 1856.
[20:24.000 --> 20:30.000]  Conformable or agreeable to reason, just, rational.
[20:30.000 --> 20:45.000]  Second, an award must be reasonable for it to be of things nougatory in themselves, for if it be of things nougatory in themselves, and offering no advantage to either of the parties, it cannot be enforced.
[20:45.000 --> 20:48.000]  And then we get to reasonable act.
[20:48.000 --> 20:52.000]  This term signifies such an act as the law requires.
[20:52.000 --> 20:59.000]  When an act is unnecessary, a party will not be required to perform it as a reasonable act.
[20:59.000 --> 21:01.000]  Now remember both of these, okay?
[21:01.000 --> 21:08.000]  And then let's go over here and look at the Black's Law First Edition iteration of reasonable.
[21:08.000 --> 21:16.000]  And it reads agreeable to reason, just, proper, ordinary, or usual.
[21:16.000 --> 21:24.000]  Reasonable act, such as may be fairly, justly, and reasonably be required of a party.
[21:24.000 --> 21:27.000]  Then we get to Black's Law Six.
[21:27.000 --> 21:37.000]  Reasonable, fair, proper, just, moderate, suitable under the circumstances, fit and appropriate to the end-in view.
[21:37.000 --> 21:50.000]  Having the faculty of reason, rational, governed by reason, under the influence of reason, agreeable to reason, thinking, speaking, or acting according to the dictates of reason.
[21:50.000 --> 21:58.000]  Not immoderate or excessive, being synonymous with rational, honest, equitable, fair, suitable, moderate, tolerable.
[21:58.000 --> 22:07.000]  Reasonable act, such as may fairly, justly, and reasonably be required of a party, okay?
[22:07.000 --> 22:10.000]  Now why is that important to understand?
[22:10.000 --> 22:16.000]  Well let's look at the facts of what occurs at a transportation stop.
[22:16.000 --> 22:26.000]  And then try to look at this in the light of reasonable and see if it fits.
[22:26.000 --> 22:36.000]  During a transportation stop, any number of things can be done to you from simply giving you a warning and saying have a good night or just even saying,
[22:36.000 --> 22:40.000]  hey, did you know you've got a brake light out or your tire's low?
[22:40.000 --> 22:44.000]  I just want to let you know to get that fixed before you had an accident.
[22:44.000 --> 22:51.000]  From that point all the way up to killing you dead.
[22:51.000 --> 23:02.000]  On which point of that scale does unreasonable kick in versus reasonable?
[23:02.000 --> 23:18.000]  Is it reasonable to put an individual, a member of the public, the people, at risk of bodily injury or death because they had a brake light out?
[23:18.000 --> 23:21.000]  Or they didn't use a turn signal?
[23:21.000 --> 23:30.000]  Or they don't have a three-inch square piece of plastic in their pocket?
[23:30.000 --> 23:35.000]  Or they're simply crossing the road to get to the other side?
[23:35.000 --> 23:41.000]  Where does reasonable become unreasonable in that scale?
[23:41.000 --> 23:49.000]  If the constitutional protection of reasonable is to be understood in its proper terms,
[23:49.000 --> 23:59.000]  then simply anything the legislature cares to declare reasonable wouldn't fly under any common sense idea of rights.
[23:59.000 --> 24:07.000]  It wouldn't possibly fly because let's look at the idiocy of saying there's a special statute that authorizes something
[24:07.000 --> 24:17.000]  that is inherently unreasonable on its face to become suddenly reasonable because there's a statute that says so.
[24:17.000 --> 24:24.000]  If the constitutional requirement for government is that they may not act against us unreasonably,
[24:24.000 --> 24:35.000]  then how can they write a statute that circumvents that requirement by lowering the bar of what's reasonable?
[24:35.000 --> 24:40.000]  Think about that because where then, how low can they set that bar?
[24:40.000 --> 24:45.000]  And what subjects are they limited to in setting that bar?
[24:45.000 --> 24:47.000]  Because let's face facts.
[24:47.000 --> 24:54.000]  If they can just pull you over for any arbitrary reason they want to in your car, why can't they do it when you're on foot?
[24:54.000 --> 24:59.000]  Why can't they do it when you're on a bicycle? Why can't they do it for any reason they want to?
[24:59.000 --> 25:03.000]  Why do they need a warrant to come onto your property and search it then?
[25:03.000 --> 25:10.000]  If they want to declare that a search without a warrant suddenly becomes reasonable,
[25:10.000 --> 25:14.000]  then why can't they just write a statute to make that right completely vanish?
[25:14.000 --> 25:23.000]  Just like they have your right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures at the hands of law enforcement
[25:23.000 --> 25:26.000]  just because you're in your car.
[25:26.000 --> 25:33.000]  And let's not overlook the fact that if you are actually a commercial motor vehicle operator or driver,
[25:33.000 --> 25:40.000]  that the statute be specifically written for you has actually required you to weigh
[25:40.000 --> 25:45.000]  fundamentally protected rights in order to exercise the privilege associated with that license.
[25:45.000 --> 25:47.000]  Something else a statute cannot do.
[25:47.000 --> 25:53.000]  It cannot convert a right into a crime and then license it back to you for a fee.
[25:53.000 --> 25:56.000]  Yet that's exactly what they're doing.
[25:56.000 --> 26:00.000]  And then they're trying to argue that because you applied for this,
[26:00.000 --> 26:09.000]  which by any definition of the word apply means volunteer, not be coerced like you are right now,
[26:09.000 --> 26:14.000]  because if you want to use your car for the reason you purchased it,
[26:14.000 --> 26:20.000]  they want you to believe that you must have their written permission to do it, right?
[26:20.000 --> 26:24.000]  I mean, explain this concept to me if you can.
[26:24.000 --> 26:29.000]  This is something I want someone to reasonably explain.
[26:29.000 --> 26:36.000]  Why is it perfectly reasonable and legal to purchase a car, to possess a car,
[26:36.000 --> 26:42.000]  to own a car, to ride in a car, all without any sort of state permission whatsoever?
[26:42.000 --> 26:47.000]  You don't need any documents from the state to do those things at all.
[26:47.000 --> 26:51.000]  All you need is money and the time to go down and find the one you want.
[26:51.000 --> 26:58.000]  But once you have that car in your possession, suddenly you have no right to use that car
[26:58.000 --> 27:03.000]  for its designed and intended purpose of traveling from point A to point B
[27:03.000 --> 27:10.000]  without express written permission from the state.
[27:10.000 --> 27:14.000]  How is that reasonable?
[27:14.000 --> 27:21.000]  See, these are the types of questions they don't want you and I to start asking.
[27:21.000 --> 27:30.000]  Because once we start asking them, someone somewhere is eventually going to be tasked with having to give you an answer.
[27:30.000 --> 27:42.000]  And eventually you're going to come to realize that the answer you're being given is total BS.
[27:42.000 --> 27:48.000]  And it will be some stupid, statist reason.
[27:48.000 --> 27:52.000]  Well, you have to give up certain rights when you become a member of society.
[27:52.000 --> 28:02.000]  No, you don't. You may have to exert your own self-governing capability to limit the way you use them
[28:02.000 --> 28:09.000]  so as not to harm someone else or their rights, but you're not giving them up.
[28:09.000 --> 28:15.000]  It's not that you can't do that thing ever again without someone's permission.
[28:15.000 --> 28:24.000]  It's simply that you must choose reasonably when and where to exercise that right so as not to endanger someone else.
[28:24.000 --> 28:27.000]  End of story.
[28:27.000 --> 28:33.000]  The government doesn't get to say we took it away because you joined society.
[28:33.000 --> 28:38.000]  The government doesn't get to say you don't have it anymore because you joined society.
[28:38.000 --> 28:44.000]  The government doesn't get to say you willingly gave it up because you joined society.
[28:44.000 --> 28:51.000]  That is a cop-out bowl of crockpot crap.
[28:51.000 --> 28:55.000]  Not true never will be true.
[28:55.000 --> 29:04.000]  But it's things that lawyers or attorneys in this case and their ilk in government want you to believe is necessary and true
[29:04.000 --> 29:10.000]  when it absolutely is not necessary and true.
[29:10.000 --> 29:16.000]  Because if it were true, it would have to apply to each of them just like it does us, and we know damn well
[29:16.000 --> 29:21.000]  none of them believe any of this crap applies to them.
[29:21.000 --> 29:29.000]  They either have the money to buy their way out of it or they have the political clout to ace their way out of it.
[29:29.000 --> 29:33.000]  It's really just that simple.
[29:33.000 --> 29:39.000]  So don't buy into this crap about what they're telling you is reasonable, that you don't have rights
[29:39.000 --> 29:45.000]  because we determined that it wasn't reasonable for you to be able to exercise those rights
[29:45.000 --> 29:51.000]  for this particular activity or in this particular place under these particular circumstances.
[29:51.000 --> 29:54.000]  It's a crock, people.
[29:54.000 --> 30:01.000]  All right, y'all hang on, we'll be right back after this break.
[30:01.000 --> 30:05.000]  A NASA probe found something on the moon that has space entrepreneurs starry-eyed,
[30:05.000 --> 30:08.000]  and they're already seeing the green, but it's not green cheese.
[30:08.000 --> 30:13.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell you about the business opportunity they discovered in a moment.
[30:13.000 --> 30:17.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches
[30:17.000 --> 30:21.000]  and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[30:21.000 --> 30:22.000]  That's creepy.
[30:22.000 --> 30:24.000]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:24.000 --> 30:27.000]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:27.000 --> 30:32.000]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies,
[30:32.000 --> 30:34.000]  and they're third-party certified.
[30:34.000 --> 30:38.000]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[30:38.000 --> 30:41.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[30:41.000 --> 30:44.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:44.000 --> 30:49.000]  A NASA probe has found billions of gallons of frozen water on the moon,
[30:49.000 --> 30:52.000]  and space entrepreneurs plan to make a fortune by mining it.
[30:52.000 --> 30:56.000]  The moon's ice could be defrosted, purified, and used for drinking water.
[30:56.000 --> 31:03.000]  It could also be split into oxygen and hydrogen, oxygen for breathing, and hydrogen to power rocket ships.
[31:03.000 --> 31:08.000]  Companies are already dreaming up plans to sell moon fuel at low-orbit fueling stations,
[31:08.000 --> 31:11.000]  where space travelers can top off their tanks.
[31:11.000 --> 31:17.000]  Futurists predict the moon's water will power a new wave of space trade, exploration, and out-of-this-world living.
[31:17.000 --> 31:21.000]  It seems it may also make some people astronomically rich.
[31:21.000 --> 31:26.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:26.000 --> 31:29.000]  What are you thinking?
[31:29.000 --> 31:35.000]  Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month.
[31:35.000 --> 31:45.000]  Infusa.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidney, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever.
[31:45.000 --> 31:52.000]  It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products that save you space, time, and money.
[31:52.000 --> 31:58.000]  Call 888-910-4367 only at infusa.org.
[31:58.000 --> 32:02.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:02.000 --> 32:10.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:10.000 --> 32:17.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:17.000 --> 32:23.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:23.000 --> 32:33.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[32:33.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:38.000 --> 32:45.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original text, and a copy of the book.
[32:45.000 --> 32:52.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:52.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:01.000]  Order your copy today, and together, we can have a free society we all want and deserve.
[33:01.000 --> 33:12.000]  Live, Free Speech Radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:12.000 --> 33:34.240]  All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. All right. Now, back to what
[33:34.240 --> 33:38.400]  I was saying at the very beginning, how's all this going to tie back together? Well,
[33:38.400 --> 33:44.360]  we're going to start challenging the initial arrest on this because the arrest was, one,
[33:44.360 --> 33:49.600]  without a warrant. Two, it was not reasonable under the circumstances or the conditions
[33:49.600 --> 33:56.920]  that existed at the time. Three, it is being, they're unlawfully applying a regulatory statute
[33:56.920 --> 34:03.280]  to people to whom it doesn't apply, period. And they're using it to perpetrate fraud upon
[34:03.280 --> 34:08.360]  the public. Whenever you're arrested without a warrant, a warrantless arrest by its very
[34:08.360 --> 34:15.080]  nature is considered unlawful. You have a right to a probable cause determination when
[34:15.080 --> 34:20.420]  you are arrested without a warrant. Yet here in Texas, you have these courts constantly
[34:20.420 --> 34:24.880]  saying that the only people that have the right to a probable cause determination are
[34:24.880 --> 34:32.280]  those accused of a felony. And that's dead wrong. This is exactly why these lower courts
[34:32.280 --> 34:41.200]  are so willing to violate law to get you to enter a plea without ever having been given
[34:41.200 --> 34:46.760]  proper notice of the nature and cause, the allegation itself, jurisdiction being vested
[34:46.760 --> 34:51.680]  in the court by the filing of a complaint and charging instrument. All of these things
[34:51.680 --> 34:59.880]  are going to get waived the moment you enter a plea. Okay? Now, understand that. You're
[34:59.880 --> 35:03.680]  going to waive your right to notice. You're going to waive your right to challenge impersonal
[35:03.680 --> 35:10.240]  jurisdiction. You're going to waive the right to everything, okay? Challenge the form and
[35:10.240 --> 35:15.600]  substance of the charging instrument and the complaint. But you are also going to waive
[35:15.600 --> 35:22.920]  your right to demand your examining trial for the purpose of getting a probable cause
[35:22.920 --> 35:32.480]  determination on the warrantless arrest. Okay? Their ploy is to get you to enter that plea
[35:32.480 --> 35:43.180]  at all costs to nullify those rights as expeditiously as possible. Now, there's something I want
[35:43.180 --> 35:50.160]  you to understand about this process when they do it. And it kind of goes something
[35:50.160 --> 35:56.320]  like this. All right? Let me see if I can find this here and I'll read it to you if
[35:56.320 --> 36:15.560]  I can find where it went to. Let's see. All right. Now, the way this reads is this. Fraud
[36:15.560 --> 36:23.760]  in the common law sense of deceit is committed by deliberately misleading another by words,
[36:23.760 --> 36:31.040]  by acts, or in some instances, notably where there is a fiduciary relationship which creates
[36:31.040 --> 36:38.440]  a duty to disclose all material facts by silence. Now, that's United States versus Dial and
[36:38.440 --> 36:46.200]  Salmon, 757 Federal Second 163 from 1985. In other words, it goes to the legal maxim,
[36:46.200 --> 36:54.920]  he who has a duty to speak and does not commit the fraud. Okay? So, here we have these courts
[36:54.920 --> 37:02.060]  that are refusing to disclose the nature and cause. They are refusing to disclose the misapplication
[37:02.060 --> 37:08.040]  of the transportation code to the general public. They are refusing to provide you access
[37:08.040 --> 37:13.760]  to a proper examining trial in order to get a proper probable cause determination, an
[37:13.760 --> 37:21.360]  appealable probable cause determination no less, for the fact that they committed a warrantless
[37:21.360 --> 37:26.760]  arrest against you without lawful authority. Now, if you understand where all this goes
[37:26.760 --> 37:33.240]  full circle here with reasonableness, knowing the nature and cause, and so on and so forth.
[37:33.240 --> 37:36.560]  If they can deprive you of your rights by creating what they want to call a special
[37:36.560 --> 37:42.040]  statute, then none of your rights are safe. If they can do it for your right to be protected
[37:42.040 --> 37:46.680]  from unreasonable searches and seizures like they have with the transportation code, even
[37:46.680 --> 37:55.360]  if you were a voluntary participant in transportation, which we aren't, it's still converting rights
[37:55.360 --> 38:05.440]  into privileges and licensing them back to you, something they cannot reasonably do.
[38:05.440 --> 38:13.120]  And yet, because they have gotten control of the education system, you have gotten apathetic,
[38:13.120 --> 38:18.000]  you don't know how to defend yourself, you don't know why to defend yourself, or that
[38:18.000 --> 38:22.360]  you even have a right to defend yourself, much less the information on the procedures
[38:22.360 --> 38:27.800]  and process for doing it, because these people don't play by the very rules that they say
[38:27.800 --> 38:33.840]  are mandatory for you but optional for them, even though the rules in question are directed
[38:33.840 --> 38:38.120]  specifically at them.
[38:38.120 --> 38:44.640]  There's nothing about this that's fair. It is all fraud, and it is very easy to demonstrate
[38:44.640 --> 38:51.520]  that it is fraud. But once again, you're going to have the statist attorneys and other a-holes
[38:51.520 --> 38:56.400]  in power saying, no, that ain't the way it works, it don't work this way because you
[38:56.400 --> 39:05.760]  gave up your rights when you joined society. Okay? My BS meter pegs out every time I hear
[39:05.760 --> 39:17.600]  one of those morons say that. Because only a moron would say it. All right. That being
[39:17.600 --> 39:22.040]  said, let's start taking some callers and see what we've got going on here. All right.
[39:22.040 --> 39:26.800]  Let's go to Ralph in Texas. Ralph, how are you? What do you got?
[39:26.800 --> 39:29.640]  I'm doing good, Eddie. It's been a while. How are you doing?
[39:29.640 --> 39:31.640]  So far, so grand.
[39:31.640 --> 39:37.680]  Okay. I donated a little bit of money the first of the year. You guys still haven't
[39:37.680 --> 39:41.440]  finished your fund drive, so I'm going to put a little bit more up there.
[39:41.440 --> 39:45.200]  When you say fund drive, which one are we talking about here?
[39:45.200 --> 39:57.000]  For the Logos Radio Network. Okay. And here's part of why. I got three waivers of summons
[39:57.000 --> 40:01.680]  returned to me today. Okay. So I'm going to save some money on getting some summons and
[40:01.680 --> 40:07.720]  served on these people. And also I'd like to let you know how serious I am about my
[40:07.720 --> 40:09.200]  lawsuit. All right.
[40:09.200 --> 40:15.160]  Okay. So you had a lot to say there. And I'm taking notes and I'm recording and I'm going
[40:15.160 --> 40:21.600]  to go back over it. And I want to read you something here. What is reasonable must be
[40:21.600 --> 40:30.080]  defined by the society that used the causation of the question. I just wrote that. And the
[40:30.080 --> 40:38.360]  reason I did is because there is so little case law that we can use.
[40:38.360 --> 40:43.480]  On a lot of this, that's true. There's a lot of these issues that haven't been brought
[40:43.480 --> 40:49.640]  up for adjudication. Now some have, some of them are going by standard dictionary, but
[40:49.640 --> 40:55.040]  now reasonable, believe it or not, the case, the controlling case law on reasonable for
[40:55.040 --> 41:06.280]  Texas is actually a Texas case. It's Cass v. State, 124 Texas CR.R 208 and 61 Southwest
[41:06.280 --> 41:07.280]  Second 500.
[41:07.280 --> 41:14.440]  Okay. I'll check that out tomorrow. I'm also going to Google reasonable, but okay.
[41:14.440 --> 41:19.960]  Okay. Yeah. That's straight out of Black's Law 6 as far as the case law that made that
[41:19.960 --> 41:23.800]  definition applicable. And it's a Texas case that made it.
[41:23.800 --> 41:29.640]  Well, now I've been kind of wrapped up last night and a little bit this morning on probable
[41:29.640 --> 41:39.720]  cause, trying to find case law that will support a no probable cause arrest warrant.
[41:39.720 --> 41:40.720]  For what activity?
[41:40.720 --> 41:45.120]  Failure to identify.
[41:45.120 --> 41:51.560]  Based upon what? What was the, see failure to identify can't be a charge all by itself
[41:51.560 --> 41:57.080]  because failure to identify can only be applied to someone if they have already been lawfully
[41:57.080 --> 42:04.760]  arrested for some other offense or being lawfully detained for some other offense. And then
[42:04.760 --> 42:11.440]  as far as the detention goes, the only rule is, is that you cannot give them false information,
[42:11.440 --> 42:17.160]  but you're not required to give them any information in a detention.
[42:17.160 --> 42:21.000]  So what were the circumstances that gave rise to the failure to identify?
[42:21.000 --> 42:25.240]  A traffic stop for improperly worn seatbelt.
[42:25.240 --> 42:30.320]  Okay. Well, their probable cause to make the traffic stop doesn't exist, provided you're
[42:30.320 --> 42:32.840]  not a commercial driver.
[42:32.840 --> 42:38.760]  I informed the officer and he wrote it on his criminal complaint that he was notified
[42:38.760 --> 42:43.920]  that the, I think he called me a subject or whatever it was, notified him that he was
[42:43.920 --> 42:46.280]  not in commerce.
[42:46.280 --> 42:50.400]  Did you say in commerce or engaging in transportation?
[42:50.400 --> 42:51.400]  Commerce.
[42:51.400 --> 43:01.000]  Okay. Stop doing that. Let me explain why people stop using the word commerce by itself.
[43:01.000 --> 43:08.080]  Stop doing that. The code is not the fricking commerce code. The terminology is not commerce.
[43:08.080 --> 43:16.280]  Though the terms are related, they are not the same thing. The subject matter being regulated
[43:16.280 --> 43:30.720]  here is transportation. Okay. Transportation. That's an occupation. Okay. It's either a
[43:30.720 --> 43:38.840]  business related occupation or a business related activity, but don't just say commerce.
[43:38.840 --> 43:44.360]  All right. I got another break. Hang on just a minute. We'll be back to pick this up. Okay.
[43:44.360 --> 43:48.640]  I'll let you finish up with what you're going on to here. All right, folks. This is Rule
[43:48.640 --> 43:55.160]  of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984. Give us a call. Get in line. We'll be right
[43:55.160 --> 43:57.880]  back and we'll pick back up with Ralph when we do.
[43:57.880 --> 44:07.320]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary,
[44:07.320 --> 44:14.680]  the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.680 --> 44:20.640]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer,
[44:20.640 --> 44:25.960]  know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and
[44:25.960 --> 44:32.800]  now you can too. JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning
[44:32.800 --> 44:38.720]  experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.720 --> 44:44.240]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio
[44:44.240 --> 44:51.240]  classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much
[44:51.240 --> 44:59.840]  more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[44:59.840 --> 45:09.200]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by
[45:09.200 --> 45:14.600]  our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas. I'm Brave New Books
[45:14.600 --> 45:19.520]  and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.520 --> 45:23.880]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.880 --> 45:27.920]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian emu oil,
[45:27.920 --> 45:36.040]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find
[45:36.040 --> 45:44.480]  us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. Don't
[45:44.480 --> 46:01.400]  forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.840 --> 46:22.280]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one? If you could not wait any
[46:22.280 --> 46:29.440]  bouts too long, would your purple test be done? Watch your center man, the soldier, or warrior of love
[46:29.440 --> 46:37.160]  scaffolding to keep the peace. All I'm taking is my misunderstanding. Somebody calls the police,
[46:37.160 --> 46:55.840]  watching the sparks fly. Alright folks, we are back and we are talking with Ralph. Alright Ralph,
[46:55.840 --> 47:05.400]  do you understand why it's important not to just say commerce? Yes, I do now. Okay. I haven't
[47:05.400 --> 47:09.880]  thought about it, but since you asked the question, yes I do. In my defense, I'm going to say that I
[47:09.880 --> 47:17.920]  knew you had your material. I had your material printed at home. I did not think it would look
[47:17.920 --> 47:22.920]  good if I was reading it on the side of the road, so I didn't carry it with me. But after I was
[47:22.920 --> 47:27.840]  arrested, I started carrying it with me. I wanted to be able to print it up, and I folded it cross
[47:27.840 --> 47:32.200]  fold, and now I'm carrying it in my pocket, pull it out, and I don't have to read it, but I have to
[47:32.200 --> 47:38.440]  look at it for notes. I'm going on material that I only looked at a couple of times, and I said
[47:38.440 --> 47:45.040]  commerce. So they also picked that up. Now, in a quid pro quo type situation, where the government
[47:45.040 --> 47:50.880]  is saying these recent rulings, we're like, okay, well we arrested him for this, but we mentioned
[47:50.880 --> 47:56.640]  this in our affidavit, so we're going to count that. And that's this new Utah beef sprite case
[47:56.640 --> 48:06.080]  that I just now read about today, this morning, June 27, 2016. I don't know if you've had a chance
[48:06.080 --> 48:10.840]  to read that. I mean, there's a gazillion cases out there. I just don't know if you've read that
[48:10.840 --> 48:15.560]  one. But I'm like... I hadn't, but if you'll send me a link to whatever article or whatever it is
[48:15.560 --> 48:20.640]  you're talking about, I'd be happy to take a look at it. Reason.com. I'll send you the link,
[48:20.640 --> 48:25.520]  and it's also... And I downloaded it from US Supreme Court, the actual case. Now, I haven't read
[48:25.520 --> 48:33.560]  it, okay? But I did read the highlights. So right now, I've got two cases I wanted to discuss with
[48:33.560 --> 48:39.000]  you. However, the very subject I called to talk to you about, you're covering tonight, which is
[48:39.000 --> 48:45.240]  unbelievable. It's actually happened before. Jeff, in this strip, he calls about this federal case,
[48:45.240 --> 48:50.000]  and I'm like, wow, man, these are things I need to know. And it's really great listening. Now,
[48:50.000 --> 48:54.840]  that said, I'm going to go ahead and give you the names of the cases and why I think they should and
[48:54.840 --> 48:59.600]  apply, and then I want your opinion on it, if you don't mind. And the first one is, I'm calling it
[48:59.600 --> 49:15.080]  MSOEMVZ. Say that one more time. MSOEMVZ. Okay. And I think it's a Native American name. I don't
[49:15.080 --> 49:19.640]  know. I'm not completely familiar with the case. I read the highlights, and it's a little bit
[49:19.640 --> 49:31.560]  troubling. It's spelled E-M-E-S-O-W-U-M. Now, you can get that part. You can get the rest of it quite
[49:31.560 --> 49:41.480]  easily, I'm sure. Okay. But what's your point about it? This case is also a 2016 case. And it says,
[49:41.480 --> 49:50.320]  failure to identify is okay to arrest if the affidavit the officers were having him arrested
[49:50.320 --> 49:58.960]  on the failure to identify states other reasons, which is probably not famous where someone else
[49:58.960 --> 50:06.880]  can coherently understand it. But in my head, it's the same thing as the Utah B-Strike. What
[50:06.880 --> 50:15.040]  they're saying is, what an officer does today is illegal. But if he finds something in the person's
[50:15.040 --> 50:21.680]  past that can make it legal, then we'll just go ahead and count that. Both cases, same thing.
[50:21.680 --> 50:28.840]  Yeah. What they're attempting to do is take past activities and use it as the basis for a
[50:28.840 --> 50:35.800]  current crime so that they can justify the failure to identify charge, which is completely bogus.
[50:35.800 --> 50:41.600]  This, once again, is courts and attorneys attempting to rewrite the law after the fact.
[50:41.600 --> 50:46.200]  They're trying to interpret it in a way that expands their power to prosecute,
[50:46.200 --> 50:54.200]  even though the language doesn't support it. Nor does it bode well for the rights themselves
[50:54.200 --> 51:04.600]  as not supporting it. Okay. Okay. I was going to ask you your opinion of Atwater. But I'm going
[51:04.600 --> 51:10.880]  to throw mine out there real quick. Atwater versus Lago Vista? Yes. What about it? 2001,
[51:10.880 --> 51:15.960]  right? Yeah. Well, hey, it's okay to arrest somebody for spitting on the sidewalk. Okay.
[51:15.960 --> 51:21.720]  However, I'm thinking that somebody using your method can defeat that. Okay. See,
[51:21.720 --> 51:26.320]  I was stopped for a seatbelt. I was arrested to identify. They're already saying,
[51:26.320 --> 51:31.680]  oh, hey, it's a traffic stop. He's already admitted he was subjected to a traffic stop,
[51:31.680 --> 51:38.520]  etc., etc., etc. I do not want to get into the transportation issue, although I'm willing to.
[51:38.520 --> 51:42.480]  I've listened to you talk about it enough, but I'm going to have to study that to get into it.
[51:42.480 --> 51:45.760]  And I just don't think it's relevant. I am saying-
[51:45.760 --> 51:53.120]  Well, wait a minute. What do you mean you don't think it's relevant? How could it not be relevant?
[51:53.120 --> 52:01.040]  I was arrested and charged with failure to identify. So how can a traffic stop be relevant
[52:01.040 --> 52:04.400]  in a failure to identify? I'm still working on that.
[52:04.400 --> 52:12.800]  Because it is the basis of the original charge. Remember, failure to identify has no effect
[52:12.800 --> 52:18.000]  unless you've already been lawfully arrested or detained for something else. That lawful part is
[52:18.000 --> 52:25.200]  where this kicks in. How can you be lawfully detained or arrested under a regulatory statute
[52:25.200 --> 52:31.280]  that has nothing to do with you? That means I've got to argue transportation.
[52:31.280 --> 52:36.400]  I've got enough to do already. Not saying I won't, but it's just going to be a lot of effort on my
[52:36.400 --> 52:40.800]  part, is what I'm saying, to actually learn it. This also goes right back to the aspect of
[52:40.800 --> 52:48.720]  reasonable. Okay? How can you be arrested or under arrest for another crime when the arrest itself
[52:48.720 --> 52:55.680]  is not reasonable because it's not actually a crime? Well, I'm using that, but they're saying
[52:55.680 --> 53:00.960]  that- I don't have it in front of me, but they're saying that, well, it was reasonable because he
[53:00.960 --> 53:08.640]  was detained for a seatbelt. No, it's not reasonable because a detention
[53:08.640 --> 53:15.440]  does not constitute a requirement to identify. It only requires that you don't give them false
[53:15.440 --> 53:22.080]  identity information. There are two criteria to failure to identify, depending upon whether
[53:22.080 --> 53:26.800]  you've been arrested or detained. There are two different sets of criteria here.
[53:28.720 --> 53:35.600]  Now, here's the issue. In Texas, the case of Aziz v. State says that these stops are arrests.
[53:36.320 --> 53:43.840]  Okay? Therefore, under failure to identify, you had to have been lawfully arrested for that
[53:43.840 --> 53:49.760]  transportation stop, which you weren't unless you were a commercial driver or operator.
[53:51.200 --> 53:55.360]  So you weren't lawfully arrested under the transportation code for anything.
[53:56.640 --> 54:04.160]  Okay. Okay. Yes. If they are trying to say that this was a detention, then 3802 penal code,
[54:04.160 --> 54:09.760]  failure to identify, only says that in a lawful detention, which this also was not,
[54:09.760 --> 54:16.480]  because it involved transportation to which you are not subject, under the detention,
[54:16.480 --> 54:22.400]  the only requirement is you cannot give them false information, but you are not obligated
[54:22.400 --> 54:32.720]  to actually give them any information for a detention. You understand what I'm saying here?
[54:32.720 --> 54:37.280]  Okay. I'm going to have to study that. It's down in the front of my head. I need to get
[54:37.280 --> 54:40.480]  it deeper, so I'm going to study what you just said by listening to it some more times.
[54:40.480 --> 54:47.920]  But yeah, I do. Now, that is far better than what I did, but what I did was I said it is
[54:47.920 --> 54:53.600]  unreasonable not to inform a person that they're arrested when they have repeatedly asked you,
[54:53.600 --> 54:58.720]  or am I under arrest? Because that's what I learned from your material,
[54:58.720 --> 55:02.640]  right or wrong, that's what I learned from your material. I asked them, am I under arrest?
[55:02.640 --> 55:09.040]  No, you're in detention. Am I free to go? No. Okay. Well, I don't understand, officer.
[55:09.040 --> 55:14.640]  What do you want? I want your name and address. I want you to know who you are. Am I under arrest,
[55:14.640 --> 55:20.800]  officer? You're under, you're in detention. Am I free to go? No. I asked this a dozen times.
[55:22.080 --> 55:26.800]  So I'm saying that's unreasonable to hold someone for 40 minutes while they're asking
[55:26.800 --> 55:30.400]  if they're under arrest, they're told they're not under arrest, then you're under arrest,
[55:30.400 --> 55:35.520]  and I actually timed it 20 seconds later, before I had a chance to get out of the car,
[55:35.520 --> 55:40.560]  the window's broken. Okay, it's not the way I remember it, but that's the way the audio plays
[55:40.560 --> 55:47.280]  out, 20 seconds. And I asked the officer, how far are you willing to go? Now, what's wrong with that?
[55:47.280 --> 55:50.720]  How far are you willing to go? Well, I'm going to bust the glass. Oh, no, don't do that. I'll get
[55:50.720 --> 55:55.040]  out. Instead, you bust the glass. You know, I'm telling you this really 20 seconds sounds like a
[55:55.040 --> 56:02.000]  long time. It happened pretty quick, in my mind. I am saying unreasonable is the fact that I asked
[56:02.000 --> 56:08.400]  if I was under arrest, and for 40 minutes I was told I was not. And then boom, I was told I was.
[56:08.960 --> 56:14.160]  20 seconds later, my window's busted. Okay. Why did they continue to hold you?
[56:14.160 --> 56:23.280]  Well, according to, not on my audio, but on the cruiser recording, which I did eventually get.
[56:24.240 --> 56:30.640]  I don't know how, you know, maybe the great divine creator sent it to me, but I got it. But anyway,
[56:31.280 --> 56:34.080]  he's saying I'm a Texas Republic.
[56:34.080 --> 56:36.080]  Republic of Texas individual.
[56:36.800 --> 56:41.360]  Excuse me, I'm sorry, yes. Republic of Texas type individual, and he thinks
[56:41.360 --> 56:46.480]  this is the truth for telling radio bit facts that he needs to back up immediately
[56:46.480 --> 56:48.480]  because things could turn ugly any second.
[56:50.480 --> 56:50.980]  Okay.
[56:50.980 --> 56:54.640]  I think that he wanted to get in my car and search it. Got long hair, got a beard, hey,
[56:54.640 --> 56:58.160]  got to have gold, got to have drugs, got to have got, got to have something. Searched my car for
[56:58.160 --> 56:59.680]  30 minutes, found nothing.
[56:59.680 --> 57:04.240]  What did he base this alleged Republic of Texas allegation on?
[57:04.240 --> 57:12.560]  He said that I was, well, I couldn't just generally say, he said I was refusing to identify myself,
[57:12.560 --> 57:17.120]  but he actually said something. He said something about law. He's quoting law or he thinks he knows
[57:17.120 --> 57:24.560]  law or something, and he also says, this reminds me of that video I saw, and it's scaring me.
[57:25.360 --> 57:30.480]  So evidently, he saw some kind of training video where somebody jumped out from a taxi
[57:30.480 --> 57:35.520]  republic. Yeah, that's the, that's the FBI training video where they're trying to convince
[57:35.520 --> 57:41.760]  everybody that basically is starting to exert their rights as now a terrorist. Something else we have
[57:41.760 --> 57:43.760]  attorneys to thank for.
[57:43.760 --> 57:49.440]  Back in the 90s, you know, I swore allegiance to them. And let me show you something. You're
[57:49.440 --> 57:53.360]  probably familiar with this and any listeners out there that want to know, here's where they need
[57:53.360 --> 57:55.360]  to go. I'm going to find right here, right here.
[57:55.360 --> 58:05.360]  Texas rules the court. Rule 53. Anyone wishing to state a law, a special act of law, this state
[58:05.360 --> 58:11.360]  early Republic of Texas. He'd only cite the title thereof. The Texas Republic is not there.
[58:11.360 --> 58:15.360]  It's there. It's just like a, like an un-precipitated, no one's advertising it.
[58:15.360 --> 58:19.360]  Yeah, I know. I'm, I'm familiar with that statute.
[58:19.360 --> 58:27.360]  But you aren't going to get the, the dead brained individuals running the state to agree to any of
[58:27.360 --> 58:31.360]  that, despite the fact you've got written documentation to back it up in the form of a
[58:31.360 --> 58:37.360]  treaty signed by Bill Clinton through a D, a Texas ranger. All right. Hang on just a second.
[58:37.360 --> 58:41.360]  I got a break to do. All right, folks, this is rule of law radio. We'll be right back after this
[58:41.360 --> 58:51.360]  break. So y'all hang in there. The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless
[58:51.360 --> 58:57.360]  readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help
[58:57.360 --> 59:03.360]  by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:03.360 --> 59:11.360]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:11.360 --> 59:17.360]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages
[59:17.360 --> 59:23.360]  are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which
[59:23.360 --> 59:29.360]  you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version
[59:29.360 --> 59:35.360]  simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us
[59:35.360 --> 59:51.360]  toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.360 --> 59:59.360]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[59:59.360 --> 01:00:07.360]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily
[01:00:07.360 --> 01:00:15.360]  bulletins for the commodity market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop
[01:00:15.360 --> 01:00:25.360]  into the tides of the alternatives. Markets for Wednesday, the 17th of August, 2016,
[01:00:25.360 --> 01:00:32.360]  are currently trading with gold at $1,349.35 an ounce, silver at $19.68 an ounce,
[01:00:32.360 --> 01:00:45.360]  Texas crude at $46.58 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $572 U.S. currency.
[01:00:45.360 --> 01:00:52.360]  Today in history, the year, 1982, the first compact discs or CDs are released in public in Germany.
[01:00:52.360 --> 01:00:58.360]  It was a recording from 1979 of Claudio Arau performing Chopin's waltzes. He was invited to the
[01:00:58.360 --> 01:01:07.360]  Langenhagen plant to press the star button. In recent news, U.S. District Judge Ann J. Brown
[01:01:07.360 --> 01:01:12.360]  sentenced Corey LaCueve, the first defendant from the armed takeover in the Oregon Wildlife Refuge
[01:01:12.360 --> 01:01:16.360]  earlier this year, to a two-and-a-half-year prison sentence for his role in the federal conspiracy case.
[01:01:16.360 --> 01:01:21.360]  He'll also have a three-year supervised release afterwards and an amount of restitution be paid
[01:01:21.360 --> 01:01:26.360]  when that amount is determined in the future. Corey was the first of 26 standoff defendants
[01:01:26.360 --> 01:01:31.360]  who pleaded guilty to the armed conspiracy. Though conspiracy charges usually carry a prison sentence
[01:01:31.360 --> 01:01:36.360]  of up to six years, federal prosecutors settled for less as part of the plea bargain agreement
[01:01:36.360 --> 01:01:44.360]  since Corey was the first in the case to take responsibility.
[01:01:44.360 --> 01:01:48.360]  Donald Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, was set to receive an intelligence briefing
[01:01:48.360 --> 01:01:52.360]  in New York today. The intent is to give him an inside scoop into the global threats that the U.S.
[01:01:52.360 --> 01:01:56.360]  is facing, a standard procedure for major party candidates. The briefing does not contain
[01:01:56.360 --> 01:02:01.360]  sensitive intelligence, not at the level of the presidential daily briefing, for example,
[01:02:01.360 --> 01:02:06.360]  but more akin to the broad and descriptive testimony given by senior officials to Congress each year
[01:02:06.360 --> 01:02:11.360]  at a public hearing on global threats. Trump brought along General Mike Flynn, former head
[01:02:11.360 --> 01:02:15.360]  of the Defense Intelligence Agency, since the candidates are not required to hold security
[01:02:15.360 --> 01:02:20.360]  clearances, but any aid in the room with them does. For the first 52 years of presidential
[01:02:20.360 --> 01:02:25.360]  candidate intelligence briefings, the CIA gave them directly. However, since 2004,
[01:02:25.360 --> 01:02:29.360]  the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has now taken over this task.
[01:02:29.360 --> 01:02:36.360]  The session includes a printed briefing book for each candidate.
[01:02:36.360 --> 01:03:00.360]  The loan for a lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. If you have a product or a service you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257. This is Rick Rode with your lowdown for August 17, 2016.
[01:03:00.360 --> 01:03:29.360]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty. I read his book and it says he cares not for the unsightly. These warmongers come by that term rightly.
[01:03:29.360 --> 01:03:40.360]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, and I'm going to wrap this up with Ralph here. All right, Ralph, let's see if we can get this discussion wrapped up for you so I can get to these other callers.
[01:03:40.360 --> 01:03:45.360]  Yes, sir. You said earlier, arrest is unreasonable on its face, which is why...
[01:03:45.360 --> 01:03:50.360]  A warrantless arrest is unreasonable on its face.
[01:03:50.360 --> 01:03:55.360]  Okay, yeah, I like those words. I can use those words. But does that come from a case side or does that come from inside?
[01:03:55.360 --> 01:04:12.360]  There's lots of case law on that, citing exactly those words. It doesn't say it in that order. It says that a warrantless arrest is inherently unreasonable, is what it says.
[01:04:12.360 --> 01:04:31.360]  Okay, okay. That's good enough. That's good enough. Now, going back to MSOM and Atwater. Atwater is 2001 and MSOM is 2016. If I was arrested in 2014, then we're going with 2014 case law, correct?
[01:04:31.360 --> 01:04:39.360]  No, you're free to use whatever precedent-setting case law there is, as long as it hasn't been overruled by something else. That's when you have to jeopardize the case.
[01:04:39.360 --> 01:05:00.360]  Okay, well, jeopardizing is going to be rather difficult, but I have got the potential. But now, if I was arrested in 2014 or anyone was arrested in the next year, and then two or three years later, the Supreme Court or another higher court says that this applies, I've always heard that it's the law at the time of the incident.
[01:05:00.360 --> 01:05:16.360]  It is, but the question is whether or not what you think the case says actually overturns the other cases you're referencing. You have to understand that they use nuanced language in these opinions.
[01:05:16.360 --> 01:05:26.360]  To read it on its face, it may look like it says one thing, but when you start dissecting it, it actually doesn't say that because it can't.
[01:05:26.360 --> 01:05:44.360]  Now, if and when it turns out that it does, that's case law that needs to be challenged anyway. And you can use the prior case law to say, hey, we've had prior precedent that said this, this, and this. Where are you suddenly getting the idea you can rewrite the law on your own in an opinion?
[01:05:44.360 --> 01:05:52.360]  Okay, but see, how do you challenge case law? Do you make like a constitutional challenge, a case law challenge? How do you do that?
[01:05:52.360 --> 01:06:06.360]  You simply put in the motion that you're doing that it would appear that the determination of the court and blah, blah, blah case is inherently incorrect and unreasonable on its face.
[01:06:06.360 --> 01:06:09.360]  Challenge the case law.
[01:06:09.360 --> 01:06:11.360]  Challenge the case law. Okay.
[01:06:11.360 --> 01:06:27.360]  All right. I've got a zillion questions, but I'll limit it to one more. Okay. All right. This is a strange one. Local rules, service and filing of pleadings and other documents. Service of documents filed by pro se litigants.
[01:06:27.360 --> 01:06:53.360]  That's the title of it. Service of documents filed by pro se litigants. A document filed by pro se litigants shall be deemed as served for purposes of calculating deadlines under the local rules or federal rules of civil procedures on the date it is electronically docketed in the court CFECF system.
[01:06:53.360 --> 01:06:57.360]  That's totally insane. How can you say?
[01:06:57.360 --> 01:07:03.360]  Well, the thing is, that's why you need to make sure that you get a date stamp on anything you file with them.
[01:07:03.360 --> 01:07:10.360]  You can show that you filed it on such and such date, then they're going to try and say, well, we didn't enter it for a week.
[01:07:10.360 --> 01:07:12.360]  How does that become your fault?
[01:07:12.360 --> 01:07:19.360]  Well, even if they don't enter it for the next day, I've always thought that a document was filed when you put it in the post office.
[01:07:19.360 --> 01:07:23.360]  Well, so does the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:07:23.360 --> 01:07:33.360]  The local rules of court cannot exceed the mandated rules of the Code of Criminal Procedure except in specific areas where the code says they can.
[01:07:33.360 --> 01:07:41.360]  They cannot change the calculation of time because that power is not given to the local courts.
[01:07:41.360 --> 01:07:48.360]  Well, I'm going to have serious problems with this one and I'm thinking, you know, I'm going to have serious problems with this one.
[01:07:48.360 --> 01:07:55.360]  You need to challenge that local rule as unconstitutional and a violation of law on its face.
[01:07:55.360 --> 01:08:02.360]  The local rules of procedure does not comply with the practices and procedures of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:08:02.360 --> 01:08:07.360]  Okay, here's my problem. Where do I do that? With the chief judge of the district?
[01:08:07.360 --> 01:08:12.360]  You file a constitutional challenge to that local rule of court.
[01:08:12.360 --> 01:08:20.360]  You file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge of that court for that local rule of court.
[01:08:20.360 --> 01:08:23.360]  But where? I mean, which court?
[01:08:23.360 --> 01:08:29.360]  Well, let's see. Who do you file judicial conduct complaints with? The Judicial Conduct Committee.
[01:08:29.360 --> 01:08:37.360]  Who do you file constitutional challenges with? The court in which the case itself is being done.
[01:08:37.360 --> 01:08:41.360]  Oh, sounds good. By those reasons.
[01:08:41.360 --> 01:08:48.360]  You write a motion challenging that local rule and demanding that local rule be withdrawn.
[01:08:48.360 --> 01:08:52.360]  You file a judicial conduct complaint with the Judicial Conduct Committee.
[01:08:52.360 --> 01:09:03.360]  And then you file an actual complaint with the attorney general's office against that judge for official oppression because they have designated.
[01:09:03.360 --> 01:09:05.360]  Now, here's an important thing you want to compare to.
[01:09:05.360 --> 01:09:13.360]  What is the filing deadline calculated as in relation to any filings by non-prose?
[01:09:13.360 --> 01:09:17.360]  When are they considered filed when an attorney files it?
[01:09:17.360 --> 01:09:24.360]  I had a rule of procedure the day it's mailed or the day it's deposited in the...
[01:09:24.360 --> 01:09:32.360]  No, you said this rule was in the local rules of court. Does the local rules of court address that specific issue?
[01:09:32.360 --> 01:09:41.360]  The only thing I have found is that it says three days are added no matter how.
[01:09:41.360 --> 01:09:44.360]  If it's mailed or if it's electronically served, it doesn't matter.
[01:09:44.360 --> 01:09:47.360]  The only thing I found says three days. It doesn't say anything else about service.
[01:09:47.360 --> 01:09:52.360]  It just says three days are added, which three days are always added if you're using the mail.
[01:09:52.360 --> 01:09:55.360]  But it just says three days are added, mail or no mail.
[01:09:55.360 --> 01:09:57.360]  So that's the only thing I've found.
[01:09:57.360 --> 01:10:06.360]  I don't believe... Well, then again, that local rule of procedure is just as bogus as the other one.
[01:10:06.360 --> 01:10:12.360]  The Code of Criminal Procedure says it is considered filed when it is postmarked,
[01:10:12.360 --> 01:10:17.360]  as long as it's postmarked before midnight on the day of.
[01:10:17.360 --> 01:10:27.360]  Otherwise, if it's postmarked after midnight or the next day, it starts the next day of being filed.
[01:10:27.360 --> 01:10:32.360]  Well, last note, just to say there's no question, you need to get on.
[01:10:32.360 --> 01:10:36.360]  I could talk to you for days, I think, and get a lot from you every minute of it.
[01:10:36.360 --> 01:10:45.360]  But the actual officer that arrested or stopped me for the traffic, he has refused a waiver,
[01:10:45.360 --> 01:10:47.360]  and I think he's moved out of town.
[01:10:47.360 --> 01:10:51.360]  He's one of the few out of 17 that's actually not taken a waiver.
[01:10:51.360 --> 01:10:55.360]  I'm thinking I don't have a lawsuit without him.
[01:10:55.360 --> 01:10:57.360]  What do you mean you don't have a lawsuit without him?
[01:10:57.360 --> 01:11:02.360]  You can get him back any time you want to by serving him.
[01:11:02.360 --> 01:11:04.360]  Well, no, I'm going to try that.
[01:11:04.360 --> 01:11:07.360]  I've offered him a waiver and he didn't take it.
[01:11:07.360 --> 01:11:13.360]  But I found it a little bit amazing that he wouldn't take it, of all the people.
[01:11:13.360 --> 01:11:17.360]  Well, what are you calling a waiver, Ralph?
[01:11:17.360 --> 01:11:18.360]  Notice of lawsuit.
[01:11:18.360 --> 01:11:21.360]  Please accept this waiver to save the cost of summons.
[01:11:21.360 --> 01:11:25.360]  If you do not, if you accept this waiver, you have 60 days to answer the lawsuit.
[01:11:25.360 --> 01:11:30.360]  If you do not accept this waiver, then you will have to pay the fees for the service of summons
[01:11:30.360 --> 01:11:33.360]  by process server unless you can show good just cause-wise.
[01:11:33.360 --> 01:11:38.360]  Well, where did you get the idea you could do that?
[01:11:38.360 --> 01:11:41.360]  In the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
[01:11:41.360 --> 01:11:43.360]  Why are you looking?
[01:11:43.360 --> 01:11:44.360]  Wait a minute.
[01:11:44.360 --> 01:11:48.360]  Where are you suing them in federal court or state court?
[01:11:48.360 --> 01:11:50.360]  Title 42, 1983.
[01:11:50.360 --> 01:11:51.360]  Okay.
[01:11:51.360 --> 01:12:00.360]  So the federal rules say that you can charge him for the service that you're required to do for your lawsuit.
[01:12:00.360 --> 01:12:04.360]  If he refuses to accept the waiver.
[01:12:04.360 --> 01:12:05.360]  Okay.
[01:12:05.360 --> 01:12:06.360]  All right.
[01:12:06.360 --> 01:12:13.360]  Otherwise, if I win the lawsuit, he's going to have to pay that anyway because there will be a cost of court.
[01:12:13.360 --> 01:12:17.360]  Well, he doesn't care because he's not the one that would be paying it.
[01:12:17.360 --> 01:12:19.360]  He could care less.
[01:12:19.360 --> 01:12:21.360]  Well, I'm suing them individually.
[01:12:21.360 --> 01:12:24.360]  You're not suing them in their official capacity?
[01:12:24.360 --> 01:12:25.360]  Can't.
[01:12:25.360 --> 01:12:27.360]  My lawyer lied to me.
[01:12:27.360 --> 01:12:30.360]  My lawyer lied to me and I lost the right.
[01:12:30.360 --> 01:12:36.360]  I lost my notice of lawsuit, it has to be filed within six months in Newton County.
[01:12:36.360 --> 01:12:40.360]  And my lawyer did not even tell me, hey, I'm your lawyer until after eight days.
[01:12:40.360 --> 01:12:44.360]  My lawyer for seven months.
[01:12:44.360 --> 01:12:47.360]  Actually four months, but seven months after I've been arrested.
[01:12:47.360 --> 01:12:49.360]  It's a long story.
[01:12:49.360 --> 01:12:50.360]  I've got a lawsuit against him.
[01:12:50.360 --> 01:12:52.360]  I actually talked to you about this before and I can understand now.
[01:12:52.360 --> 01:12:55.360]  Remember, you told me I have two separate lawsuits.
[01:12:55.360 --> 01:13:07.360]  One, Title 42 or whatever for unlawful arrest and I have another totally separate lawsuit for legal malpractice.
[01:13:07.360 --> 01:13:09.360]  Against the attorney, yeah.
[01:13:09.360 --> 01:13:12.360]  Guess who else is not answering my lawsuit?
[01:13:12.360 --> 01:13:14.360]  The attorney.
[01:13:14.360 --> 01:13:21.360]  You know, I got him recorded, you know, saying, ah, I will do this for you and this and this and this and you're a misdemeanor.
[01:13:21.360 --> 01:13:27.360]  And then he goes before the district judge and says, oh, I never worked as an attorney in the misdemeanor.
[01:13:27.360 --> 01:13:34.360]  Still, so I called you and you said, send him a copy of your audio in a transcript or whatever, you know.
[01:13:34.360 --> 01:13:38.360]  So I sent him a transcript from the audio and told him what was in it.
[01:13:38.360 --> 01:13:40.360]  And I didn't get anything from the judge for a long time.
[01:13:40.360 --> 01:13:44.360]  So I finally called the judge and of course he never answered the phone, his coordinator does.
[01:13:44.360 --> 01:13:47.360]  And I gave her the message and she didn't come back.
[01:13:47.360 --> 01:13:57.360]  The judge is not going to give you a written answer because if there are any criminal charges, he doesn't, it's not out of his hands.
[01:13:57.360 --> 01:14:03.360]  Well, see, I know there's criminal charges, but what have they done with my criminal charges up to now?
[01:14:03.360 --> 01:14:04.360]  Nothing.
[01:14:04.360 --> 01:14:11.360]  I've got federal criminal charges now, but I'm kind of busy with, you know, 12b6s, you know, to do everything at once.
[01:14:11.360 --> 01:14:13.360]  You know, I mean, I kind of looked over there.
[01:14:13.360 --> 01:14:15.360]  I crept over to the side of the building and looked inside.
[01:14:15.360 --> 01:14:20.360]  They got separataries, big topping machines, computers the size of my house.
[01:14:20.360 --> 01:14:24.360]  You know, me, I got you on the phone.
[01:14:24.360 --> 01:14:26.360]  Thank you Eddie.
[01:14:26.360 --> 01:14:27.360]  Welcome, I think.
[01:14:27.360 --> 01:14:29.360]  Okay.
[01:14:29.360 --> 01:14:31.360]  Okay, I'm starting to rant.
[01:14:31.360 --> 01:14:32.360]  So I've had a lot from you.
[01:14:32.360 --> 01:14:33.360]  I appreciate it.
[01:14:33.360 --> 01:14:34.360]  I hope you can help some other people with that.
[01:14:34.360 --> 01:14:35.360]  All right.
[01:14:35.360 --> 01:14:36.360]  Thank you.
[01:14:36.360 --> 01:14:37.360]  Bye.
[01:14:37.360 --> 01:14:38.360]  Bye-bye.
[01:14:38.360 --> 01:14:39.360]  All right.
[01:14:39.360 --> 01:14:42.360]  That being said, I've only got two minutes left in this.
[01:14:42.360 --> 01:14:48.360]  So Butch in Kansas, let's get your intro information here and then we'll pick you up after this break that's coming up.
[01:14:48.360 --> 01:14:51.360]  What do you got for me, Butch?
[01:14:51.360 --> 01:14:53.360]  Hey, it's a long story.
[01:14:53.360 --> 01:14:59.360]  I'm a private person, so I might just talk to you later.
[01:14:59.360 --> 01:15:01.360]  I know you charge, but…
[01:15:01.360 --> 01:15:02.360]  Well, I don't charge for talking.
[01:15:02.360 --> 01:15:05.360]  I charge for working.
[01:15:05.360 --> 01:15:08.360]  Well, I know, but it's personal and it's private.
[01:15:08.360 --> 01:15:09.360]  Okay.
[01:15:09.360 --> 01:15:11.360]  And I'm a personal and private person.
[01:15:11.360 --> 01:15:12.360]  All right.
[01:15:12.360 --> 01:15:18.360]  Well, if you email me your contact information, I'll see what I can do to make that happen.
[01:15:18.360 --> 01:15:19.360]  All right.
[01:15:19.360 --> 01:15:20.360]  Thank you, sir.
[01:15:20.360 --> 01:15:21.360]  You're welcome.
[01:15:21.360 --> 01:15:22.360]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:15:22.360 --> 01:15:24.360]  I respect you 100%.
[01:15:24.360 --> 01:15:26.360]  Well, I appreciate that.
[01:15:26.360 --> 01:15:29.360]  I try to do my best to be respectable.
[01:15:29.360 --> 01:15:30.360]  I'm a beginner.
[01:15:30.360 --> 01:15:43.360]  I studied constitutional law where you're to be securing a person's papers, property, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures and those of affirmation.
[01:15:43.360 --> 01:15:52.360]  And I know what probable cause means and I have a Black's Law Dictionary and all that stuff.
[01:15:52.360 --> 01:16:16.360]  But it is what it is. I have not been able to travel properly since 2014 because I have the Department of Motor Vehicles and a collection agency that says I'm not able to get a driver's license to go to work.
[01:16:16.360 --> 01:16:18.360]  Okay.
[01:16:18.360 --> 01:16:41.360]  And it goes on and on, but I guess it was a default because I was never notified of a hearing, which I lost my house, lost my girl, moved out, and I did not put a new address in with the Department of Motor Vehicles, which they took their license.
[01:16:41.360 --> 01:16:42.360]  Okay.
[01:16:42.360 --> 01:16:44.360]  Well, I got a break coming up here, Butch.
[01:16:44.360 --> 01:16:49.360]  You're getting less private by the minute, by the way, but if you want to keep talking, hang in there and I'll pick you up on the other side.
[01:16:49.360 --> 01:16:52.360]  If not, send me your contact info.
[01:16:52.360 --> 01:16:54.360]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[01:16:54.360 --> 01:17:00.360]  Y'all hang in there.
[01:17:00.360 --> 01:17:08.360]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:08.360 --> 01:17:14.360]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.360 --> 01:17:18.360]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:18.360 --> 01:17:23.360]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:23.360 --> 01:17:26.360]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:26.360 --> 01:17:32.360]  In addition, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollenburks.
[01:17:32.360 --> 01:17:39.360]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10 percent above wholesale and more.
[01:17:39.360 --> 01:17:43.360]  We broker Metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.360 --> 01:17:46.360]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:46.360 --> 01:17:51.360]  We're located at 7304 Burnet Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.360 --> 01:17:54.360]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.360 --> 01:18:00.360]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.360 --> 01:18:06.360]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.360 --> 01:18:11.360]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.360 --> 01:18:17.360]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.360 --> 01:18:25.360]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated and mutilated, young Jeopardy can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.360 --> 01:18:31.360]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.360 --> 01:18:39.360]  We have come to trust Young Jeopardy so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others.
[01:18:39.360 --> 01:18:47.360]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.360 --> 01:18:51.360]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jeopardy, you may want to join us.
[01:18:51.360 --> 01:18:58.360]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:58.360 --> 01:19:00.360]  Order now.
[01:19:00.360 --> 01:19:22.360]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.360 --> 01:19:47.360]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:47.360 --> 01:19:52.360]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to Sean in Kentucky.
[01:19:52.360 --> 01:19:55.360]  Sean, what can we do for you?
[01:19:55.360 --> 01:20:01.360]  Hi, Eddie. First time caller. I've been listening to you for about six months or so.
[01:20:01.360 --> 01:20:05.360]  First saw you on Alex Jones' show.
[01:20:05.360 --> 01:20:13.360]  I did email you a couple months ago about a case in Iowa where I was arrested for driving while barred,
[01:20:13.360 --> 01:20:18.360]  right literally the day before I moved down here to Kentucky.
[01:20:18.360 --> 01:20:26.360]  I was barred for two, I guess two previous DUIs, even though I had a valid Nebraska driver's license.
[01:20:26.360 --> 01:20:34.360]  Long and short of it is, I didn't do everything that I would have been required to do in the state of Iowa,
[01:20:34.360 --> 01:20:43.360]  like special appearance request while I was incarcerated and saw the judge in jail the next day and so on.
[01:20:43.360 --> 01:20:46.360]  Here's what's happened, though.
[01:20:46.360 --> 01:20:55.360]  They did not give me a speedy trial. My lawyer sent me the paperwork.
[01:20:55.360 --> 01:21:05.360]  I did not waive my right to speedy trial, and I told her that, but I'm not waiving my right to speedy trial.
[01:21:05.360 --> 01:21:13.360]  And I tried to explain to her, oh, I wanted to have a conversation with her with what I've learned from you.
[01:21:13.360 --> 01:21:19.360]  And she was very abrasive, you know, nope, nope, you were operating, that's it, you know.
[01:21:19.360 --> 01:21:24.360]  And I was like, okay, well, she said, just send me what you're talking about in an email, and I did.
[01:21:24.360 --> 01:21:29.360]  Next thing I know, she has recused herself from the case.
[01:21:29.360 --> 01:21:34.360]  I was transferred to the public defender's office in the state public defender's office,
[01:21:34.360 --> 01:21:39.360]  didn't return any of my phone calls, didn't send me any paperwork,
[01:21:39.360 --> 01:21:44.360]  other than the paperwork I already received, you know, the basic trial information and so on.
[01:21:44.360 --> 01:21:50.360]  And now I have a warrant for my arrest, and I can't go back, visit family, visit friends, you know.
[01:21:50.360 --> 01:21:53.360]  And I just really don't know what to do at this point.
[01:21:53.360 --> 01:21:57.360]  I wasn't telling her to do anything, and I did email you, like I said, and you were kind of like,
[01:21:57.360 --> 01:22:05.360]  well, since I can't defend myself, there's not much I can do from here.
[01:22:05.360 --> 01:22:13.360]  Okay. Well, if you're not capable of doing this yourself, then you're already sunk.
[01:22:13.360 --> 01:22:18.360]  Because as you've noticed, no attorney wants to do what the right thing is in this case,
[01:22:18.360 --> 01:22:22.360]  and that properly defends you according to the allegations being made.
[01:22:22.360 --> 01:22:23.360]  Right.
[01:22:23.360 --> 01:22:30.360]  And, you know, I've got these so-called attorneys that are telling me that I'm wrong about this.
[01:22:30.360 --> 01:22:32.360]  I know better. I'm not wrong about this.
[01:22:32.360 --> 01:22:36.360]  I've never been wrong about this, and neither have the people been wrong about this.
[01:22:36.360 --> 01:22:42.360]  But it's people like that that tend to make it where, if they're not controlling us, they're not happy.
[01:22:42.360 --> 01:22:46.360]  Hence the whole reason they seek public office and the power to do it in the first place.
[01:22:46.360 --> 01:22:47.360]  Exactly.
[01:22:47.360 --> 01:22:53.360]  But the problem here is, is you're not going to get one to defend you properly.
[01:22:53.360 --> 01:22:54.360]  Yours is not.
[01:22:54.360 --> 01:22:55.360]  Right.
[01:22:55.360 --> 01:23:00.360]  If you can't do this yourself, you shouldn't be in this fight to begin with.
[01:23:00.360 --> 01:23:03.360]  And that's just the cut and dry of it.
[01:23:03.360 --> 01:23:05.360]  Yeah.
[01:23:05.360 --> 01:23:18.360]  Now, well, then the question therein lies, if I return to Iowa and I turn myself in under that warrant, does that start the process over?
[01:23:18.360 --> 01:23:20.360]  What do you mean, does it start the process over?
[01:23:20.360 --> 01:23:25.360]  No, the process will pick up wherever it was if it's for the same charge.
[01:23:25.360 --> 01:23:29.360]  And then they would just keep me incarcerated until I went to trial, basically.
[01:23:29.360 --> 01:23:31.360]  Probably.
[01:23:31.360 --> 01:23:42.360]  Because right now, in most states, the law is written so that if you are actually out of state when the warrant is issued, you become a felon evading.
[01:23:42.360 --> 01:23:45.360]  What? Are you serious? Wow.
[01:23:45.360 --> 01:23:46.360]  No, I'm serious.
[01:23:46.360 --> 01:23:52.360]  It's felony evasion if you leave the state when a warrant's been issued for you.
[01:23:52.360 --> 01:24:02.360]  In many states. Now, I can't say for sure whether or not it's written that way where you're from, but that's the way it is in a lot of places.
[01:24:02.360 --> 01:24:07.360]  I mean, the warrant was issued after I was gone, you know, after I got out of jail.
[01:24:07.360 --> 01:24:14.360]  And I told the officer, at least, I was like, no, my lawyer knew and the court report knew.
[01:24:14.360 --> 01:24:18.360]  They have my Kentucky address and everything.
[01:24:18.360 --> 01:24:26.360]  So I guess the warrant was issued like last week and all this transpired, you know, in May or so.
[01:24:26.360 --> 01:24:28.360]  Well, the thing is, understand what I said.
[01:24:28.360 --> 01:24:32.360]  I said if you flee the state after the warrant has been issued.
[01:24:32.360 --> 01:24:33.360]  Oh, okay.
[01:24:33.360 --> 01:24:39.360]  So they have it on record that I had a Kentucky address before any warrant was issued.
[01:24:39.360 --> 01:24:41.360]  So that would not cost me.
[01:24:41.360 --> 01:24:45.360]  I don't believe that will stop them unless you do it.
[01:24:45.360 --> 01:24:47.360]  Right.
[01:24:47.360 --> 01:24:50.360]  So basically, I'd have to put a good case together and...
[01:24:50.360 --> 01:24:56.360]  Not only that, but most likely if you want to get out of jail at any point to do what you need to do to make that case,
[01:24:56.360 --> 01:25:00.360]  you're going to have to pay a bond to do it and they're going to set it really high.
[01:25:00.360 --> 01:25:02.360]  Yeah.
[01:25:02.360 --> 01:25:10.360]  Now, the question is, can they even lock you up for the offense in that state?
[01:25:10.360 --> 01:25:15.360]  Driving while barred? Well, the plea bargain was 14 days.
[01:25:15.360 --> 01:25:17.360]  That's not my question.
[01:25:17.360 --> 01:25:25.360]  My question is, do they consider that a jailable offense?
[01:25:25.360 --> 01:25:27.360]  From what I can tell, yes.
[01:25:27.360 --> 01:25:28.360]  Okay.
[01:25:28.360 --> 01:25:32.360]  What is the maximum time of incarceration for the violation?
[01:25:32.360 --> 01:25:34.360]  Two years.
[01:25:34.360 --> 01:25:35.360]  Okay.
[01:25:35.360 --> 01:25:38.360]  So it's a Class A misdemeanor most likely.
[01:25:38.360 --> 01:25:39.360]  Uh-huh.
[01:25:39.360 --> 01:25:40.360]  Okay.
[01:25:40.360 --> 01:25:41.360]  Yeah, I think so.
[01:25:41.360 --> 01:25:42.360]  Yeah.
[01:25:42.360 --> 01:25:43.360]  Well, you said two years.
[01:25:43.360 --> 01:25:44.360]  Yeah.
[01:25:44.360 --> 01:25:50.360]  Well, in that case, it'd have to be higher than that unless they've got a completely different standard for misdemeanor.
[01:25:50.360 --> 01:25:55.360]  Aggravated. Yeah, it's an aggravated misdemeanor, I believe.
[01:25:55.360 --> 01:25:56.360]  Okay.
[01:25:56.360 --> 01:25:57.360]  All right.
[01:25:57.360 --> 01:26:05.360]  Well, in any case, yeah, you're going to either have to learn how to do this or you're going to have to find somebody that will actually fight for you and good luck on the latter.
[01:26:05.360 --> 01:26:06.360]  Yeah.
[01:26:06.360 --> 01:26:10.360]  And what's sad is my grandfather is actually a lawyer in that state, but he's retired.
[01:26:10.360 --> 01:26:12.360]  Okay.
[01:26:12.360 --> 01:26:15.360]  Yeah, and he just says, well, the people voted for it.
[01:26:15.360 --> 01:26:17.360]  I'm like, oh, man.
[01:26:17.360 --> 01:26:21.360]  You know, he's one of those like, you know, you can talk about things.
[01:26:21.360 --> 01:26:22.360]  People voted for this.
[01:26:22.360 --> 01:26:24.360]  People said this is what goes.
[01:26:24.360 --> 01:26:29.360]  Yeah, but the thing is, is the people can't make blanket choices for the rest of the people.
[01:26:29.360 --> 01:26:35.360]  They can make choices about regulating activities that can be regulated, but they can't do it to their fellow men.
[01:26:35.360 --> 01:26:39.360]  That's the part nobody seems to want to understand, especially the attorneys.
[01:26:39.360 --> 01:26:43.360]  That's the part inside of you that just says, hey, you know, you know this is wrong.
[01:26:43.360 --> 01:26:47.360]  Well, you would think it would, but in some people that part doesn't exist.
[01:26:47.360 --> 01:26:51.360]  They think it's right just because somebody took a damn vote on it.
[01:26:51.360 --> 01:26:52.360]  Right.
[01:26:52.360 --> 01:26:55.360]  And that's not true.
[01:26:55.360 --> 01:26:58.360]  I agree.
[01:26:58.360 --> 01:27:04.360]  Well, there are a couple of things the judge didn't do when I sent that letter to that attorney in the email.
[01:27:04.360 --> 01:27:12.360]  What would the judge, what is it a judge would be required to do in relation to a letter you sent to an attorney?
[01:27:12.360 --> 01:27:13.360]  Okay.
[01:27:13.360 --> 01:27:18.360]  He's required by Iowa state law to enter a plea for me, kind of similar to Texas.
[01:27:18.360 --> 01:27:21.360]  It's very similar.
[01:27:21.360 --> 01:27:28.360]  However, when I called the court of court after that court date to see what went on and what happened,
[01:27:28.360 --> 01:27:32.360]  and that's when I learned that my lawyer basically ditched me.
[01:27:32.360 --> 01:27:34.360]  I said, did the judge enter a plea?
[01:27:34.360 --> 01:27:36.360]  She said, no, he did not.
[01:27:36.360 --> 01:27:45.360]  So it leaves me to believe that in order to refuse herself from the case, she may have possibly, in speculation, of course,
[01:27:45.360 --> 01:27:50.360]  she may have possibly showed him the email, which I kind of bullet pointed a lot at.
[01:27:50.360 --> 01:27:51.360]  No.
[01:27:51.360 --> 01:27:54.360]  The point is that you had requested assistance of counsel.
[01:27:54.360 --> 01:27:57.360]  Your attorney was asking to be released from counsel,
[01:27:57.360 --> 01:28:02.360]  and therefore he couldn't enter a plea on your behalf because you no longer had counsel.
[01:28:02.360 --> 01:28:03.360]  Okay.
[01:28:03.360 --> 01:28:06.360]  And I didn't know if there was a gray area there.
[01:28:06.360 --> 01:28:08.360]  So, all right.
[01:28:08.360 --> 01:28:11.360]  I mean, there's some other due process issues there.
[01:28:11.360 --> 01:28:16.360]  I just don't know how to get it entered in, but I guess I'll just have to keep logging away at it.
[01:28:16.360 --> 01:28:17.360]  Well, good luck.
[01:28:17.360 --> 01:28:23.360]  I guess I need to take the choose, I need to choose a time to do it, be prepared, you know, go up there.
[01:28:23.360 --> 01:28:24.360]  That would help.
[01:28:24.360 --> 01:28:25.360]  To do, I guess.
[01:28:25.360 --> 01:28:27.360]  Being prepared always helps.
[01:28:27.360 --> 01:28:28.360]  Ask the Boy Scouts.
[01:28:28.360 --> 01:28:29.360]  Yep.
[01:28:29.360 --> 01:28:30.360]  Yeah.
[01:28:30.360 --> 01:28:31.360]  Yep.
[01:28:31.360 --> 01:28:32.360]  All right.
[01:28:32.360 --> 01:28:34.360]  Anyway, I appreciate your time, and I'll let you go.
[01:28:34.360 --> 01:28:35.360]  All right, Sean.
[01:28:35.360 --> 01:28:36.360]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:28:36.360 --> 01:28:37.360]  Thanks.
[01:28:37.360 --> 01:28:38.360]  Bye.
[01:28:38.360 --> 01:28:39.360]  Bye.
[01:28:39.360 --> 01:28:40.360]  All right.
[01:28:40.360 --> 01:28:41.360]  Now we're going to go to Charles in Washington.
[01:28:41.360 --> 01:28:42.360]  Charles, what do you got?
[01:28:42.360 --> 01:28:43.360]  Hey, how you doing?
[01:28:43.360 --> 01:28:44.360]  I'm doing good.
[01:28:44.360 --> 01:28:50.360]  I got about, oh, maybe a minute before I can have to cut you off for a break, and then you can come back.
[01:28:50.360 --> 01:28:52.360]  But what do you got going on?
[01:28:52.360 --> 01:28:56.360]  Okay, I talked to you a while back, and I was on medication, so I was a little woozy in the head,
[01:28:56.360 --> 01:29:05.360]  and I was talking to you about the cars that got impounded because these license plate pads were expired over 45 days.
[01:29:05.360 --> 01:29:06.360]  Right.
[01:29:06.360 --> 01:29:11.360]  So you sent me some stuff, and I really got a chance to really get into it, and when I did, I was amazed.
[01:29:11.360 --> 01:29:13.360]  So the thing is, I have to go to court.
[01:29:13.360 --> 01:29:16.360]  I'll put it off until I talk to you on how to present this stuff.
[01:29:16.360 --> 01:29:18.360]  I found a lot of good information.
[01:29:18.360 --> 01:29:19.360]  I did a lot of good research.
[01:29:19.360 --> 01:29:24.360]  Seattle has definitely hit a lot of the cases that will show I don't have to register my cars,
[01:29:24.360 --> 01:29:38.360]  but I did find a section that says that I don't have to have a license, and I think it was 46.25.010, one factor versus two.
[01:29:38.360 --> 01:29:41.360]  That section's in the paperwork I sent you, right?
[01:29:41.360 --> 01:29:44.360]  Yeah, that was in there, and nothing was going on.
[01:29:44.360 --> 01:29:46.360]  I just hadn't gotten to those codes.
[01:29:46.360 --> 01:29:50.360]  All right. Well, hang on just a second, Charles. I've got to take this break, and we'll pick up with you on the other side
[01:29:50.360 --> 01:29:52.360]  so you have time to find it over the break, okay?
[01:29:52.360 --> 01:30:00.360]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. We've got a half an hour to go and be right back.
[01:30:00.360 --> 01:30:05.360]  Underage drinkers aren't the only ones who should worry about getting carded these days.
[01:30:05.360 --> 01:30:11.360]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment to tell you why handing over your driver's license could have a whole new meaning.
[01:30:11.360 --> 01:30:19.360]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:19.360 --> 01:30:20.360]  That's creepy.
[01:30:20.360 --> 01:30:22.360]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:22.360 --> 01:30:25.360]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:25.360 --> 01:30:31.360]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:31.360 --> 01:30:38.360]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:38.360 --> 01:30:42.360]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.360 --> 01:30:45.360]  Would you share your address with perfect strangers? Probably not.
[01:30:45.360 --> 01:30:50.360]  But if you hand your driver's license to a store clerk, you may be sharing even more.
[01:30:50.360 --> 01:30:55.360]  Licenses contain a goldmine of digital information like height, weight, address, and birthdate.
[01:30:55.360 --> 01:30:59.360]  Stores can scan this into their databases to create marketing profiles.
[01:30:59.360 --> 01:31:05.360]  Overweight? You might get targeted advertising for the latest diet pill, all because you were carded.
[01:31:05.360 --> 01:31:09.360]  Here's a tip to make your next ID request less invasive.
[01:31:09.360 --> 01:31:14.360]  Place removable white tape over the magnetic strip and barcodes on your driver's license.
[01:31:14.360 --> 01:31:19.360]  The clerk will be able to make a visual verification, but won't be able to download your data.
[01:31:19.360 --> 01:31:31.360]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.360 --> 01:31:36.360]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.360 --> 01:31:38.360]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.360 --> 01:31:43.360]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.360 --> 01:31:46.360]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.360 --> 01:31:49.360]  Thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[01:31:49.360 --> 01:31:51.360]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.360 --> 01:31:54.360]  I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.360 --> 01:31:58.360]  I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.360 --> 01:32:01.360]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:29.360 --> 01:32:32.360]  To handle your claim and your roof right the first time,
[01:32:32.360 --> 01:32:39.360]  just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.360 --> 01:32:41.360]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:41.360 --> 01:32:46.360]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.360 --> 01:32:51.360]  So if those out of town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:51.360 --> 01:32:57.360]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.360 --> 01:32:59.360]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.360 --> 01:33:27.360]  Me and I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:29.360 --> 01:33:58.360]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:58.360 --> 01:34:02.360]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking to Charles in Washington.
[01:34:02.360 --> 01:34:06.360]  All right, Charles, did you find the other stuff you were looking for?
[01:34:06.360 --> 01:34:16.360]  No, I only found the one that's 5.24.010, and it reads it's a revised code of Washington,
[01:34:16.360 --> 01:34:20.360]  and it goes like the judicial notice of constitution and law,
[01:34:20.360 --> 01:34:29.360]  and it says every court of this state should take judicial notice of the constitution,
[01:34:29.360 --> 01:34:37.360]  common law, civil law, statutes of every state, territory, and other jurisdictions of the union.
[01:34:37.360 --> 01:34:42.360]  And what it was basically saying that, what about finding one state pretty much,
[01:34:42.360 --> 01:34:47.360]  I guess it upholds in the other states if it's a state of the union.
[01:34:47.360 --> 01:34:50.360]  Yeah, the federal constitution requires that the laws
[01:34:50.360 --> 01:34:55.360]  and judicial opinions of every state be given equal effect in every other state.
[01:34:55.360 --> 01:34:57.360]  They don't do it, of course.
[01:34:57.360 --> 01:35:01.360]  The courts all say, oh, we're just going to take that in an advisory capacity
[01:35:01.360 --> 01:35:04.360]  because it's from that state over there, or we'll think about it.
[01:35:04.360 --> 01:35:07.360]  They don't give equal application to any of it.
[01:35:07.360 --> 01:35:12.360]  But what they're trying to do there is they're doing what I say they absolutely cannot do.
[01:35:12.360 --> 01:35:19.360]  The people do not have a different set of rights in one state versus another.
[01:35:19.360 --> 01:35:20.360]  Okay.
[01:35:20.360 --> 01:35:23.360]  So that's what I found out because I was trying to find, you know,
[01:35:23.360 --> 01:35:26.360]  when you sent me this stuff on no license, no registration,
[01:35:26.360 --> 01:35:32.360]  I called Olympia, the Department of Licensing, and asked them about how do I turn in my pay
[01:35:32.360 --> 01:35:36.360]  because I no longer wish to have that as a privilege but reserve my right
[01:35:36.360 --> 01:35:39.360]  protected under the constitution of my common law rights.
[01:35:39.360 --> 01:35:44.360]  And so they have yet to respond to me, and I want to turn in my license,
[01:35:44.360 --> 01:35:47.360]  and that was the one thing I wanted to talk with you because I know you've done this.
[01:35:47.360 --> 01:35:53.360]  I would probably keep it for driving other people's cars, but for me, I don't wish to use it.
[01:35:53.360 --> 01:35:58.360]  So my thing is how do I grow about presenting this stuff to them?
[01:35:58.360 --> 01:36:02.360]  And I did find the other quote that clearly said I didn't have to have a license.
[01:36:02.360 --> 01:36:10.360]  It was specifically for commerce. That was the 46.25.050.
[01:36:10.360 --> 01:36:14.360]  And it clearly showed that whoever had that license was those of commerce
[01:36:14.360 --> 01:36:16.360]  except for other people.
[01:36:16.360 --> 01:36:20.360]  And they changed the wording when they said exempt.
[01:36:20.360 --> 01:36:22.360]  They don't use the word exempt. They use acceptable.
[01:36:22.360 --> 01:36:24.360]  So I had to start reading things.
[01:36:24.360 --> 01:36:27.360]  Acceptable or accepted?
[01:36:27.360 --> 01:36:28.360]  Accepted, yes.
[01:36:28.360 --> 01:36:32.360]  And so once I started reading things right, it made a lot of sense to me.
[01:36:32.360 --> 01:36:38.360]  So when I go to court, when I get stopped by the officers,
[01:36:38.360 --> 01:36:41.360]  I believe I got the script that you sent me.
[01:36:41.360 --> 01:36:44.360]  I know that I copied off when the officers stopped me.
[01:36:44.360 --> 01:36:47.360]  There's only three things I have to give him and not say nothing at all.
[01:36:47.360 --> 01:36:50.360]  That is my name, my address.
[01:36:50.360 --> 01:36:52.360]  And date of birth.
[01:36:52.360 --> 01:36:54.360]  That's the only three I have to give him.
[01:36:54.360 --> 01:36:55.360]  Yeah.
[01:36:55.360 --> 01:36:59.360]  Now, that's what Texas law says.
[01:36:59.360 --> 01:37:01.360]  You need to verify what Washington says.
[01:37:01.360 --> 01:37:03.360]  But the thing is, is like most states,
[01:37:03.360 --> 01:37:07.360]  Washington probably says that if you've been lawfully arrested,
[01:37:07.360 --> 01:37:10.360]  if he's pulled you over for a transportation offense
[01:37:10.360 --> 01:37:14.360]  and you're not in transportation, you have not been lawfully arrested.
[01:37:14.360 --> 01:37:17.360]  You have not been lawfully detained.
[01:37:17.360 --> 01:37:24.360]  The stop is illegal on its face because he would be required under due diligence,
[01:37:24.360 --> 01:37:28.360]  he would be required to first ascertain whether or not
[01:37:28.360 --> 01:37:30.360]  he has properly stopped you for that purpose.
[01:37:30.360 --> 01:37:35.360]  Sir, are you engaging in any commercial use of the highways at this time?
[01:37:35.360 --> 01:37:36.360]  Well, yes, I am.
[01:37:36.360 --> 01:37:37.360]  All right.
[01:37:37.360 --> 01:37:39.360]  Then I need to see your license and registration.
[01:37:39.360 --> 01:37:42.360]  And if you say, no, I'm not, well, then, sir,
[01:37:42.360 --> 01:37:45.360]  please take heed of this warning and have a good night.
[01:37:45.360 --> 01:37:49.360]  And that would be the end of it, if they were doing things correctly.
[01:37:49.360 --> 01:37:50.360]  But they're not.
[01:37:50.360 --> 01:37:54.360]  They are operating under false presumptions that these statutes
[01:37:54.360 --> 01:37:57.360]  and these regulatory codes apply to everyone.
[01:37:57.360 --> 01:38:00.360]  And they don't.
[01:38:00.360 --> 01:38:01.360]  Okay.
[01:38:01.360 --> 01:38:02.360]  So this is my problem.
[01:38:02.360 --> 01:38:07.360]  I'm ready to turn to my plate and I'm ready to start traveling.
[01:38:07.360 --> 01:38:10.360]  I think I put a thing up on my blog about this.
[01:38:10.360 --> 01:38:14.360]  Go check the last three or four articles that I posted and see if one of them is up there.
[01:38:14.360 --> 01:38:17.360]  But it tells you the process that I would recommend going through
[01:38:17.360 --> 01:38:21.360]  if you intend to return your license and or your registration
[01:38:21.360 --> 01:38:23.360]  and lot plates and all that stuff,
[01:38:23.360 --> 01:38:26.360]  the process to go through to make sure that they don't have anything on your record
[01:38:26.360 --> 01:38:28.360]  to hold over your head later.
[01:38:28.360 --> 01:38:32.360]  Because right here in Texas and several other states,
[01:38:32.360 --> 01:38:38.360]  after you return those, they falsely place it into a suspended state.
[01:38:38.360 --> 01:38:42.360]  When it's not suspended, they do the same thing when it's expired.
[01:38:42.360 --> 01:38:48.360]  They'll go back and put it in a suspended state even though it has expired.
[01:38:48.360 --> 01:38:49.360]  Okay.
[01:38:49.360 --> 01:38:53.360]  Now this is why I was trying to call you because right now my life is being temporarily suspended
[01:38:53.360 --> 01:38:57.360]  because I'm protesting because I took off on a medical reason.
[01:38:57.360 --> 01:38:59.360]  We talked about this last time to go to California.
[01:38:59.360 --> 01:39:03.360]  And I had a case coming up that they really had no jurisdiction over,
[01:39:03.360 --> 01:39:04.360]  but I didn't get to finish it.
[01:39:04.360 --> 01:39:07.360]  So I wrote a letter to the presiding judge protesting that.
[01:39:07.360 --> 01:39:14.360]  And then I got them to stop the suspension until the presiding judge hears it,
[01:39:14.360 --> 01:39:17.360]  the chief presiding judge hears it,
[01:39:17.360 --> 01:39:25.360]  because I was going to base that on the no jurisdiction over the basis one,
[01:39:25.360 --> 01:39:27.360]  the fact that I got hit the car.
[01:39:27.360 --> 01:39:28.360]  We talked about that.
[01:39:28.360 --> 01:39:30.360]  So I want my day either in court.
[01:39:30.360 --> 01:39:35.360]  So from that point, I'm okay with it because I did find out that I don't have to have a license,
[01:39:35.360 --> 01:39:40.360]  but I don't want to have my license in a suspended state when I do this.
[01:39:40.360 --> 01:39:43.360]  So when you said you wrote three or four articles on it, where do I find it?
[01:39:43.360 --> 01:39:44.360]  No, no, no.
[01:39:44.360 --> 01:39:45.360]  I didn't write three or four.
[01:39:45.360 --> 01:39:48.360]  I said check the last three or four because I don't remember which one it is.
[01:39:48.360 --> 01:39:51.360]  And if it's not on there, it's on my Facebook page.
[01:39:51.360 --> 01:39:53.360]  But if you can't find it, send me an e-mail,
[01:39:53.360 --> 01:39:55.360]  and I'll make sure that I've got it off the Facebook page
[01:39:55.360 --> 01:39:58.360]  and I put it up in an article on the blog.
[01:39:58.360 --> 01:40:03.360]  Well, I've been again e-mailing you with no jurisdiction.
[01:40:03.360 --> 01:40:08.360]  Well, the thing is I have been completely out of pocket on everything this past couple of weeks.
[01:40:08.360 --> 01:40:12.360]  I have been so busy, I'm trying to rewrite the seminar material,
[01:40:12.360 --> 01:40:16.360]  and yet I have constant phone calls and other things I've got to have meetings on
[01:40:16.360 --> 01:40:19.360]  through the course of the day with people and their cases.
[01:40:19.360 --> 01:40:22.360]  I'm not getting anything done, especially checking e-mail.
[01:40:22.360 --> 01:40:28.360]  That's the lowest priority I've got unless I'm expecting something from someone on a case.
[01:40:28.360 --> 01:40:33.360]  And believe me, I really do know that, and that's why I know if you're not answering me e-mails,
[01:40:33.360 --> 01:40:35.360]  you're probably on something bigger, and that's what I figured.
[01:40:35.360 --> 01:40:36.360]  So I didn't stress it.
[01:40:36.360 --> 01:40:37.360]  I got everything changed.
[01:40:37.360 --> 01:40:40.360]  I kept on putting it up, putting it up, putting it off, and so that's what I've done.
[01:40:40.360 --> 01:40:44.360]  Now, the thing I got, the biggest thing I'm concerned with now, and I will look that up.
[01:40:44.360 --> 01:40:47.360]  Now, you say if I look that up on the articles, where do I go to that?
[01:40:47.360 --> 01:40:48.360]  Is that the Logos Radio?
[01:40:48.360 --> 01:40:56.360]  No, it's the TOW of Law, T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W.wordpress.com, my blog.
[01:40:56.360 --> 01:40:58.360]  Okay, well, I got that again. Okay, I'm okay with that.
[01:40:58.360 --> 01:40:59.360]  So I looked that up tonight.
[01:40:59.360 --> 01:41:02.360]  Now, the other problem, and I'm trying to get you first here,
[01:41:02.360 --> 01:41:08.360]  is when I go on this them towing my vehicles, you told me to run the file suit,
[01:41:08.360 --> 01:41:12.360]  and you said there was three reasons our officer, our enforcement officer,
[01:41:12.360 --> 01:41:14.360]  may be allowed to tow my vehicle.
[01:41:14.360 --> 01:41:16.360]  I was heavily medicated at that time.
[01:41:16.360 --> 01:41:24.360]  The only reasons in law that they may tow private property is if it is presenting a public safety hazard
[01:41:24.360 --> 01:41:29.360]  because of where it's parked, like on the shoulder of the road, okay?
[01:41:29.360 --> 01:41:34.360]  It's being seized as evidence in a criminal investigation?
[01:41:34.360 --> 01:41:38.360]  Evidence, okay.
[01:41:38.360 --> 01:41:42.360]  Or you've had it parked on someone else's private property without permission
[01:41:42.360 --> 01:41:45.360]  over a set number of hours?
[01:41:45.360 --> 01:41:49.360]  Here in Texas, for instance, you can park on private property,
[01:41:49.360 --> 01:41:54.360]  but if you're there longer than 48 hours, the property owner can have the car towed.
[01:41:54.360 --> 01:41:55.360]  Yeah, and I'm aware of that.
[01:41:55.360 --> 01:41:59.360]  So another of those three was the case when they towed my car.
[01:41:59.360 --> 01:42:03.360]  No, that's why we say that when they're towing the car, they're retaliating.
[01:42:03.360 --> 01:42:08.360]  There's no lawful reason to take the private property at that point.
[01:42:08.360 --> 01:42:11.360]  They're not taking it for any of the lawful purposes.
[01:42:11.360 --> 01:42:21.360]  So what they're really doing is stealing the car for the purposeful intent of causing you financial hardship.
[01:42:21.360 --> 01:42:24.360]  That's exactly why they're doing it.
[01:42:24.360 --> 01:42:30.360]  Okay, so when you told me where am I able to lift that up under those three things?
[01:42:30.360 --> 01:42:35.360]  You have to look in the statutes to see when they're authorized to tow a car.
[01:42:35.360 --> 01:42:38.360]  Okay, authorized to tow.
[01:42:38.360 --> 01:42:46.360]  But again, everything in the code that you're looking at deals with one subject matter, commercial activity.
[01:42:46.360 --> 01:42:55.360]  So they can only apply anything in that code to those that are engaging in that activity.
[01:42:55.360 --> 01:42:59.360]  So it doesn't matter really what the statute says if you're able to prove that you're not engaging
[01:42:59.360 --> 01:43:03.360]  in that regulated activity for commercial purposes.
[01:43:03.360 --> 01:43:08.360]  The taking of your car in and of itself was patently illegal
[01:43:08.360 --> 01:43:16.360]  because they had no lawful authority to stop you or seize your car under that code.
[01:43:16.360 --> 01:43:21.360]  So again, you say on the commercial activity.
[01:43:21.360 --> 01:43:26.360]  In your state, it's called the Motor Vehicle Code, right?
[01:43:26.360 --> 01:43:28.360]  Yes, Motor Vehicle Code.
[01:43:28.360 --> 01:43:32.360]  Okay, but there it tells you specifically what a motor vehicle is.
[01:43:32.360 --> 01:43:36.360]  Something used for commerce, for hire, right?
[01:43:36.360 --> 01:43:37.360]  Yes.
[01:43:37.360 --> 01:43:43.360]  Okay, so they're making the argument of for hire or other commercial purposes is a valid argument.
[01:43:43.360 --> 01:43:50.360]  Here, it's transportation or other commercial purposes that is the required argument.
[01:43:50.360 --> 01:43:51.360]  Okay?
[01:43:51.360 --> 01:43:52.360]  Okay, transportation.
[01:43:52.360 --> 01:43:53.360]  All right, hang on, Charles.
[01:43:53.360 --> 01:43:55.360]  We'll finish this up on the other side quick as we can.
[01:43:55.360 --> 01:43:56.360]  Y'all hang in there, folks.
[01:43:56.360 --> 01:44:00.360]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.360 --> 01:44:05.360]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:05.360 --> 01:44:09.360]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:44:09.360 --> 01:44:14.360]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:44:14.360 --> 01:44:20.360]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:44:20.360 --> 01:44:26.360]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:44:26.360 --> 01:44:29.360]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[01:44:29.360 --> 01:44:33.360]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.360 --> 01:44:38.360]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.360 --> 01:44:40.360]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:40.360 --> 01:44:46.360]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[01:44:46.360 --> 01:44:49.360]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.360 --> 01:44:57.360]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:44:57.360 --> 01:45:00.360]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:00.360 --> 01:45:03.360]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.360 --> 01:45:07.360]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.360 --> 01:45:15.360]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.360 --> 01:45:19.360]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.360 --> 01:45:22.360]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.360 --> 01:45:27.360]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.360 --> 01:45:34.360]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.360 --> 01:45:38.360]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.360 --> 01:45:43.360]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.360 --> 01:45:49.360]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.360 --> 01:45:52.360]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.360 --> 01:45:56.360]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.360 --> 01:46:01.360]  Or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:01.360 --> 01:46:19.360]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:19.360 --> 01:46:24.360]  We are now in the last segment of this show, and we are going to wrap this up with Charles.
[01:46:24.360 --> 01:46:26.360]  All right, Charles, what else you got?
[01:46:26.360 --> 01:46:31.360]  Okay, I think you've helped me out pretty much enough. On your Facebook,
[01:46:31.360 --> 01:46:35.360]  what is your Facebook? I think I have to be assigned to your Facebook.
[01:46:35.360 --> 01:46:37.360]  I don't do Facebook.
[01:46:37.360 --> 01:46:41.360]  Yeah, you'd have to get an account before it would matter, but yeah.
[01:46:41.360 --> 01:46:44.360]  Yeah, I have a friend that has Facebook, but don't you have a law person
[01:46:44.360 --> 01:46:46.360]  into your Facebook to use it?
[01:46:46.360 --> 01:46:52.360]  If they send me a friend request, they can certainly communicate with me there, yes.
[01:46:52.360 --> 01:46:55.360]  Okay, so can I get your Facebook then?
[01:46:55.360 --> 01:47:00.360]  It is T-A-O space L-A-U-W.
[01:47:00.360 --> 01:47:02.360]  Oh, say E-A-O?
[01:47:02.360 --> 01:47:07.360]  No, T-A-O, Tango Alpha Omega.
[01:47:07.360 --> 01:47:09.360]  I got you, T-A-O, Facebook?
[01:47:09.360 --> 01:47:12.360]  No, space.
[01:47:12.360 --> 01:47:13.360]  Space.
[01:47:13.360 --> 01:47:18.360]  Law, L-A-U-W.
[01:47:18.360 --> 01:47:21.360]  Okay, got it.
[01:47:21.360 --> 01:47:25.360]  Okay, so you told me the motor vehicle code, look that up,
[01:47:25.360 --> 01:47:29.360]  and it spells out commerce, and you said transportation.
[01:47:29.360 --> 01:47:34.360]  Here in Texas, the argument is transportation and other commercial use.
[01:47:34.360 --> 01:47:40.360]  There it is, engaging in commercial activity to begin with.
[01:47:40.360 --> 01:47:44.360]  It's for hire and other commercial activity.
[01:47:44.360 --> 01:47:47.360]  And commercial use. Okay, that's what I'll find out.
[01:47:47.360 --> 01:47:51.360]  I'll look that up, and then I'll try to email you to get it for you,
[01:47:51.360 --> 01:47:52.360]  but nothing else.
[01:47:52.360 --> 01:47:53.360]  Okay, oh, here's the last thing.
[01:47:53.360 --> 01:47:56.360]  I tried to send them money, and you were saying something about it.
[01:47:56.360 --> 01:48:00.360]  When we send money, we send cash, you say to do it a certain way.
[01:48:00.360 --> 01:48:03.360]  Don't do cash, but money orders.
[01:48:03.360 --> 01:48:04.360]  No, no, no.
[01:48:04.360 --> 01:48:07.360]  I said do not send me checks or money orders.
[01:48:07.360 --> 01:48:11.360]  You can either donate electronically online with a credit card,
[01:48:11.360 --> 01:48:13.360]  or you're going to have to send cash through the mail.
[01:48:13.360 --> 01:48:19.360]  Or if you do send me a money order or a check, leave who it's made out to blank.
[01:48:19.360 --> 01:48:23.360]  Okay, okay. So who do I mail that to?
[01:48:23.360 --> 01:48:29.360]  Just mail it to the network address, which is, well, send me another email,
[01:48:29.360 --> 01:48:31.360]  and I'll get that back to you.
[01:48:31.360 --> 01:48:34.360]  I'm trying to remember what the email address is right now.
[01:48:34.360 --> 01:48:43.360]  1516 South Lamar, L-A-M-A-R, number 112.
[01:48:43.360 --> 01:48:44.360]  112.
[01:48:44.360 --> 01:48:48.360]  Austin, Texas, 78704.
[01:48:48.360 --> 01:48:51.360]  78704, Austin, Texas.
[01:48:51.360 --> 01:48:56.360]  1516 South Lamar, number 112.
[01:48:56.360 --> 01:48:59.360]  Don't forget that number 112.
[01:48:59.360 --> 01:49:00.360]  Okay.
[01:49:00.360 --> 01:49:03.360]  Austin, Texas, 78704.
[01:49:03.360 --> 01:49:04.360]  Okay, I got you.
[01:49:04.360 --> 01:49:05.360]  I appreciate that.
[01:49:05.360 --> 01:49:06.360]  So have a blessed evening.
[01:49:06.360 --> 01:49:07.360]  Thank you once again.
[01:49:07.360 --> 01:49:08.360]  Yes, sir.
[01:49:08.360 --> 01:49:09.360]  Thank you.
[01:49:09.360 --> 01:49:10.360]  All right.
[01:49:10.360 --> 01:49:13.360]  Now we are going to go to Richard in Florida.
[01:49:13.360 --> 01:49:15.360]  Richard, what do you got?
[01:49:15.360 --> 01:49:17.360]  How are you doing, Eddie?
[01:49:17.360 --> 01:49:18.360]  I'm doing good.
[01:49:18.360 --> 01:49:19.360]  You hear me clearly.
[01:49:19.360 --> 01:49:20.360]  I want to make sure.
[01:49:20.360 --> 01:49:21.360]  At the moment, yes.
[01:49:21.360 --> 01:49:22.360]  All right.
[01:49:22.360 --> 01:49:23.360]  Perfect.
[01:49:23.360 --> 01:49:24.360]  Perfect.
[01:49:24.360 --> 01:49:25.360]  All right.
[01:49:25.360 --> 01:49:29.360]  So I've got a couple of quick questions, but my first quick question is,
[01:49:29.360 --> 01:49:33.360]  is a judge allowed to enter a plea for you?
[01:49:33.360 --> 01:49:39.360]  If this law allows it, most states do, but the thing about it is generally he's not authorized
[01:49:39.360 --> 01:49:42.360]  to do it unless you have refused to do it.
[01:49:42.360 --> 01:49:49.360]  But whether or not he can do it lawfully depends upon whether or not your rights have been
[01:49:49.360 --> 01:49:51.360]  violated under his watch.
[01:49:51.360 --> 01:49:58.360]  If they attempt to do it at some point that would waive your rights and deny you in due
[01:49:58.360 --> 01:50:03.360]  process, he can't lawfully enter that plea for you, even if the law says he can enter
[01:50:03.360 --> 01:50:04.360]  one when you refuse.
[01:50:04.360 --> 01:50:08.360]  For instance, here in Texas there are certain things you have a right to.
[01:50:08.360 --> 01:50:13.360]  And when you demand that right and the court ignores you and attempts to enter a plea on
[01:50:13.360 --> 01:50:20.360]  your behalf despite due process not being provided, the entry of that plea is absolutely
[01:50:20.360 --> 01:50:24.360]  unlawful regardless of whether you refuse to enter it or not.
[01:50:24.360 --> 01:50:29.360]  Because you have the right not to waive those due process rights, and that's exactly what
[01:50:29.360 --> 01:50:31.360]  entering a plea does.
[01:50:31.360 --> 01:50:32.360]  Okay.
[01:50:32.360 --> 01:50:34.360]  So I guess I can tell you the story.
[01:50:34.360 --> 01:50:41.360]  I called a couple of weeks ago about invalid license in the 10th.
[01:50:41.360 --> 01:50:46.360]  So I had an arraignment for that on Tuesday.
[01:50:46.360 --> 01:50:55.360]  So my license is valid now because it was invalid because of the red traffic ticket.
[01:50:55.360 --> 01:50:56.360]  So I'm fighting that.
[01:50:56.360 --> 01:50:57.360]  Right.
[01:50:57.360 --> 01:50:58.360]  That's a whole nother issue.
[01:50:58.360 --> 01:51:05.360]  But for the arraignment I had for that day, I told the judge, and it's funny because I
[01:51:05.360 --> 01:51:06.360]  don't understand.
[01:51:06.360 --> 01:51:10.360]  I thought I was supposed to be speaking to the prosecutor, but he was doing most of the
[01:51:10.360 --> 01:51:11.360]  talking.
[01:51:11.360 --> 01:51:15.360]  Prosecutors are standing there, but I don't understand how that process works.
[01:51:15.360 --> 01:51:21.360]  I told him that I want these two tickets dismissed.
[01:51:21.360 --> 01:51:24.360]  And he asked on what grounds, basically.
[01:51:24.360 --> 01:51:29.360]  And I told him the grounds are, number one, the vehicle, which is the 10th, which this
[01:51:29.360 --> 01:51:33.360]  issue is not mine, and my license is valid.
[01:51:33.360 --> 01:51:36.360]  So it makes no sense to even deal with an invalid license.
[01:51:36.360 --> 01:51:42.360]  So he said, well, you have to enter a motion to dismiss.
[01:51:42.360 --> 01:51:46.360]  So what do you want to plea for the invalid license?
[01:51:46.360 --> 01:51:48.360]  I said, I'm not going to plea anything.
[01:51:48.360 --> 01:51:50.360]  I don't plea anything.
[01:51:50.360 --> 01:51:51.360]  I just want this dismissed.
[01:51:51.360 --> 01:51:53.360]  He said, well, I'm going to enter a plea for you.
[01:51:53.360 --> 01:51:59.360]  And I'm going to give you two weeks to enter a motion to dismiss, write up a paper into
[01:51:59.360 --> 01:52:00.360]  that.
[01:52:00.360 --> 01:52:02.360]  So I've got to prepare for that this week.
[01:52:02.360 --> 01:52:05.360]  But that's why I asked you that question.
[01:52:05.360 --> 01:52:11.360]  Well, the thing is, the statutes are generally written where if you refuse to plea, but again,
[01:52:11.360 --> 01:52:16.360]  was due process followed prior to the demand that the entry of the plea be made?
[01:52:16.360 --> 01:52:20.360]  Were you given proper, sufficient, and timely notice of the allegations against you and
[01:52:20.360 --> 01:52:23.360]  the nature and cause of the case against you?
[01:52:23.360 --> 01:52:28.360]  Did you file anything demanding those things, et cetera, et cetera?
[01:52:28.360 --> 01:52:33.360]  The right to notice has to be done unless you waive it.
[01:52:33.360 --> 01:52:37.360]  And I presume that you didn't, since you didn't enter a plea to do so, or arbitrarily say,
[01:52:37.360 --> 01:52:40.360]  yeah, I waived the right to notice.
[01:52:40.360 --> 01:52:43.360]  Are they required to serve you with a copy of a complaint?
[01:52:43.360 --> 01:52:44.360]  Did they?
[01:52:44.360 --> 01:52:45.360]  Et cetera, et cetera.
[01:52:45.360 --> 01:52:52.360]  If all of those due process items were never done, the judge never reached a stage where
[01:52:52.360 --> 01:52:55.360]  he could enter a plea on your behalf.
[01:52:55.360 --> 01:52:58.360]  That's exactly what I'm talking about.
[01:52:58.360 --> 01:53:04.360]  When they skip over due process to demand the entry of a plea so that the rights they're
[01:53:04.360 --> 01:53:10.360]  skipping over become automatically waived to your detriment and you're not being informed
[01:53:10.360 --> 01:53:16.360]  of this, that's denying you due process.
[01:53:16.360 --> 01:53:18.360]  All right.
[01:53:18.360 --> 01:53:21.360]  So I got to enter this into motion, right?
[01:53:21.360 --> 01:53:22.360]  This is another way to get this.
[01:53:22.360 --> 01:53:28.360]  Well, if you're going to move to disqualify this judge for judicial incompetence and failure
[01:53:28.360 --> 01:53:32.360]  to comply with the rules of procedure and the due process rights of the accused, then
[01:53:32.360 --> 01:53:34.360]  yeah.
[01:53:34.360 --> 01:53:38.360]  If you're going to put it into motion to dismiss, deal with the facts that the allegations are
[01:53:38.360 --> 01:53:39.360]  false.
[01:53:39.360 --> 01:53:40.360]  The license is perfectly valid.
[01:53:40.360 --> 01:53:44.360]  Here's the driving record to prove it's perfectly valid, and that's the end of it.
[01:53:44.360 --> 01:53:45.360]  Yes.
[01:53:45.360 --> 01:53:46.360]  All right.
[01:53:46.360 --> 01:53:47.360]  That's what I need to do for that.
[01:53:47.360 --> 01:53:51.360]  But the thing is, once you start arguing about the validity of the license, you've shot the
[01:53:51.360 --> 01:54:00.360]  not-in-commerce argument right between the eyes.
[01:54:00.360 --> 01:54:02.360]  Because what is the purpose of the license?
[01:54:02.360 --> 01:54:07.360]  The purpose of the license is to give you permission to engage in the privileged activity
[01:54:07.360 --> 01:54:13.360]  of commercial use of the highways in a motor vehicle.
[01:54:13.360 --> 01:54:14.360]  Right?
[01:54:14.360 --> 01:54:18.360]  Well, I mean, I can still put in this argument because when I'm going to enter the motion
[01:54:18.360 --> 01:54:21.360]  to dismiss, I can still enter that into motion, right?
[01:54:21.360 --> 01:54:24.360]  It's not too late.
[01:54:24.360 --> 01:54:30.360]  Yeah, but you can't make opposing arguments in the same case.
[01:54:30.360 --> 01:54:36.360]  You can't say the commercial code doesn't apply for this, but for the sake of me having
[01:54:36.360 --> 01:54:41.360]  the license, it applies over here.
[01:54:41.360 --> 01:54:44.360]  Because there you're trying to say, I have my license.
[01:54:44.360 --> 01:54:45.360]  My license is good.
[01:54:45.360 --> 01:54:48.360]  And over here, they're saying, well, you have a license.
[01:54:48.360 --> 01:54:50.360]  Yeah, but I ain't using it.
[01:54:50.360 --> 01:54:53.360]  But you're kind of counterintuitive in the argument you're making.
[01:54:53.360 --> 01:54:59.360]  Even though all of that is true, you understand how it's going to confuse the hell out of the
[01:54:59.360 --> 01:55:00.360]  issue?
[01:55:00.360 --> 01:55:02.360]  Yeah, I understand what you're saying.
[01:55:02.360 --> 01:55:03.360]  Okay.
[01:55:03.360 --> 01:55:11.360]  I mean, at this point, I still wasn't able to request a trial.
[01:55:11.360 --> 01:55:13.360]  This was a ring.
[01:55:13.360 --> 01:55:16.360]  And he was trying to get me to enter a plea.
[01:55:16.360 --> 01:55:19.360]  Yeah, but you said he entered one for you.
[01:55:19.360 --> 01:55:21.360]  Yeah, he said, I'm going to enter a plea for you.
[01:55:21.360 --> 01:55:28.360]  Okay, so now my question is, but now my question is, has all of the due process requirements
[01:55:28.360 --> 01:55:32.360]  been fulfilled before he did that?
[01:55:32.360 --> 01:55:39.360]  If not, then you need to move to disqualify this judge and also make a motion that all
[01:55:39.360 --> 01:55:49.360]  orders and other things entered by this judge be revoked, rescinded, removed, whatever, okay?
[01:55:49.360 --> 01:55:55.360]  That they be considered null and void because he had no authority at that point to do what
[01:55:55.360 --> 01:55:56.360]  he did.
[01:55:56.360 --> 01:55:57.360]  Correct.
[01:55:57.360 --> 01:55:58.360]  Okay.
[01:55:58.360 --> 01:55:59.360]  Let me ask you a question.
[01:55:59.360 --> 01:56:00.360]  You said three things.
[01:56:00.360 --> 01:56:02.360]  You said a copy of the complaint.
[01:56:02.360 --> 01:56:05.360]  No, I said that's what the process is here.
[01:56:05.360 --> 01:56:10.360]  I'm asking you, is that the process and did they do it?
[01:56:10.360 --> 01:56:14.360]  In Florida, what are they required to do and did they do it?
[01:56:14.360 --> 01:56:18.360]  I just gave you an example of the things they're required to do here.
[01:56:18.360 --> 01:56:21.360]  Now, everywhere requires notice.
[01:56:21.360 --> 01:56:25.360]  No notice, no case, period.
[01:56:25.360 --> 01:56:28.360]  So that one's a given.
[01:56:28.360 --> 01:56:30.360]  And the citation is not considered?
[01:56:30.360 --> 01:56:34.360]  You have to look and see what the case law and what the statutes consider notice in that
[01:56:34.360 --> 01:56:36.360]  regard.
[01:56:36.360 --> 01:56:38.360]  Okay.
[01:56:38.360 --> 01:56:41.360]  Okay, no problem.
[01:56:41.360 --> 01:56:44.360]  Perfect.
[01:56:44.360 --> 01:56:45.360]  All right.
[01:56:45.360 --> 01:56:53.360]  So that was on Tuesday and today I went to court in Miami about that rare light traffic
[01:56:53.360 --> 01:56:57.360]  ticket and the judge say, well, you don't have to worry about that.
[01:56:57.360 --> 01:57:00.360]  They're going up to a higher court to figure out if this is illegal or not.
[01:57:00.360 --> 01:57:04.360]  We're going to send you another court date after they come up with a conclusion.
[01:57:04.360 --> 01:57:11.360]  I guess they have maybe some kind of, what do they call it, a group of lawsuits against
[01:57:11.360 --> 01:57:15.360]  this that they're trying to see where it's going to go first.
[01:57:15.360 --> 01:57:21.360]  So he just set up another date for me to return on that.
[01:57:21.360 --> 01:57:26.360]  So that's what this whole invalid licensing came from.
[01:57:26.360 --> 01:57:31.360]  So I don't even know how they're going to attack me on this one when it's about that.
[01:57:31.360 --> 01:57:33.360]  And I'm still going to court about that.
[01:57:33.360 --> 01:57:39.360]  I'm just trying to understand how you can make me take a plea on something on fighting
[01:57:39.360 --> 01:57:41.360]  that caused the issue.
[01:57:41.360 --> 01:57:43.360]  Can they do that?
[01:57:43.360 --> 01:57:47.360]  Well, again, that's the point I'm trying to get across to you.
[01:57:47.360 --> 01:57:51.360]  If they didn't follow proper procedure to get to that stage, no, they can't.
[01:57:51.360 --> 01:57:55.360]  If they're trying to make you enter a plea on something for which there is no
[01:57:55.360 --> 01:58:00.360]  justiciable issue and you need to make a proper motion to dismiss, but that's why
[01:58:00.360 --> 01:58:05.360]  you've also got to appear in special appearance for the purpose of challenging
[01:58:05.360 --> 01:58:08.360]  their jurisdiction rather than walking in there and just making general statements
[01:58:08.360 --> 01:58:11.360]  and making it a general appearance.
[01:58:11.360 --> 01:58:15.360]  But you're past that point now, so all you can do now is file a motion to dismiss.
[01:58:15.360 --> 01:58:18.360]  Make sure that you put in a copy of the record showing that the license is still
[01:58:18.360 --> 01:58:23.360]  valid and therefore there is no case here.
[01:58:23.360 --> 01:58:26.360]  Okay.
[01:58:26.360 --> 01:58:28.360]  All right, sir, thanks for calling in.
[01:58:28.360 --> 01:58:31.360]  All right, folks, this has been the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show.
[01:58:31.360 --> 01:58:34.360]  Kenneth, I know you tried to get on and you got an issue.
[01:58:34.360 --> 01:58:41.360]  I need you to talk to Deborah or send me an email, eddieddie at ruleoflawradio.com
[01:58:41.360 --> 01:58:44.360]  with your contact information so I can get in touch with you.
[01:58:44.360 --> 01:58:50.360]  Folks, y'all have a great week, good night, and God bless.
[01:58:50.360 --> 01:58:55.360]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called
[01:58:55.360 --> 01:58:57.360]  the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.360 --> 01:59:02.360]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what
[01:59:02.360 --> 01:59:07.360]  the Bible says verse by verse helping you to know God and to know the meaning
[01:59:07.360 --> 01:59:08.360]  of life.
[01:59:08.360 --> 01:59:11.360]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.360 --> 01:59:20.360]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.360 --> 01:59:25.360]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references
[01:59:25.360 --> 01:59:30.360]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.360 --> 01:59:32.360]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.360 --> 01:59:37.360]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free
[01:59:37.360 --> 01:59:41.360]  at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.360 --> 01:59:50.360]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.360 --> 01:59:52.360]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.360 --> 01:59:54.360]  You found it.
[01:59:54.360 --> 02:00:00.360]  Go to lowgrossradionetwork.com.