[00:00.000 --> 00:06.400]  The following is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily bulletins
[00:06.400 --> 00:08.400]  for the commodities market.
[00:08.400 --> 00:21.360]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.360 --> 00:26.880]  Markets for Friday, the 12th of August, 2016 are currently trending with gold at $1,335.95
[00:26.880 --> 00:34.680]  an ounce, silver at $19.69 an ounce, Texas crude at $44.49 a barrel, and Bitcoin is
[00:34.680 --> 00:43.920]  currently sitting in about 587 U.S. currency.
[00:43.920 --> 00:50.200]  Today in history, the year 1981, the IBM personal computer is released with 10 megabytes of
[00:50.200 --> 00:51.600]  hard disk memory.
[00:51.600 --> 00:55.680]  It sold for $1,565 in 1981.
[00:55.680 --> 01:03.800]  The release of IBM's 5150 PC, today in history.
[01:03.800 --> 01:07.960]  In recent news, the first hearing in a lawsuit filed in the state of Texas in an attempt
[01:07.960 --> 01:12.160]  to reverse the Obama administration's bathroom guidelines took place in Fort Worth, Texas
[01:12.160 --> 01:13.160]  today.
[01:13.160 --> 01:17.280]  Attorney General Ken Paxton requested temporarily blocking the executive request to make public
[01:17.280 --> 01:22.000]  restrooms transgender friendly, as well as requesting an expedite to the case in order
[01:22.000 --> 01:25.980]  to strive for a ruling before the school year starts later this month.
[01:25.980 --> 01:29.400]  Even though the fed say that Texas and other states have no legal standing to request a
[01:29.400 --> 01:33.200]  preliminary injunction on the transgender bathroom guidelines due to the fact that they
[01:33.200 --> 01:38.080]  are non-binding and are only recommendations, states challenging the executive recommendations
[01:38.080 --> 01:42.720]  are litigating that it is a form of enforcement since districts that don't adhere to the guidelines
[01:42.720 --> 01:50.280]  risk losing federal funding.
[01:50.280 --> 01:54.040]  Five provinces in Thailand have been hit by 11 bombings in less than a day, with at least
[01:54.040 --> 01:59.040]  four Thai nationals being killed and about 36 others injured, including 10 foreigners.
[01:59.040 --> 02:02.160]  No one has claimed responsibility for the blast, and it's not clear if the bombings
[02:02.160 --> 02:03.160]  are connected.
[02:03.160 --> 02:06.600]  Thai police say that there is no evidence that the attacks are related to international
[02:06.600 --> 02:08.200]  or national terrorism.
[02:08.200 --> 02:12.680]  The series of blasts did come days before the first anniversary of the Arowind drying bombing,
[02:12.680 --> 02:22.280]  which killed 20 people, and five days after the country voted on a new constitution.
[02:22.280 --> 02:26.320]  The Defense Department has banned the popular Pokemon Go game from employees' work phones
[02:26.320 --> 02:30.080]  and ordered a stop to play inside the Pentagon and other department facilities.
[02:30.080 --> 02:33.960]  The primary concern appears to be the game's GPS tracking of players.
[02:33.960 --> 02:37.360]  Lieutenant Commander Patrick Evans, Pentagon spokesman, stated that there is no ban on
[02:37.360 --> 02:41.920]  the game itself for Pentagon personnel, but the apps needed to play it are not to be approved
[02:41.920 --> 02:46.640]  for government-issued devices, reminding DOD personnel that, quote, as always, we encourage
[02:46.640 --> 02:51.480]  our employees to use sound judgment when using their personal or private devices at and away
[02:51.480 --> 02:52.480]  from work.
[02:52.480 --> 03:12.880]  This was Rick Rodeo with your lowdown for August 12, 2016.
[03:12.880 --> 03:25.440]  C'mon, six o'clock noon, say somebody been shot, somebody's been abused, somebody blew
[03:25.440 --> 03:33.360]  up a building, somebody stole their car, somebody got away, somebody didn't get too far, yeah,
[03:33.360 --> 03:36.120]  they didn't get too far.
[03:36.120 --> 03:46.120]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day's slum A man had to answer for the weed that he dug
[03:46.120 --> 03:54.120]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree Round up all of them bad boys, hang them high up the street
[03:54.120 --> 03:59.120]  For all the people to see
[03:59.120 --> 04:08.120]  That justice is one thing you should always find You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line
[04:08.120 --> 04:16.120]  When the guns go to several we'll sing a victory tune And we'll all meet back at the local zoo
[04:16.120 --> 04:32.120]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing Whiskey for my men, beer for my horses
[04:32.120 --> 04:40.120]  We've got too many gangsters doing dirty deeds Too much corruption and crime in the streets
[04:40.120 --> 04:49.120]  And the long arm of the law, put a few more in the ground I'm all to the maker and you'll settle them down
[04:49.120 --> 04:53.120]  You can bet you'll settle them down
[04:53.120 --> 04:59.120]  Alright folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig.
[04:59.120 --> 05:02.120]  I want to thank you all for tuning in and listening.
[05:02.120 --> 05:10.120]  And while we're on the subject of tuning in and listening, y'all will remember that last week or so,
[05:10.120 --> 05:20.120]  I had that so-called constitutional attorney up in Colorado call in and give me all this rigmarole about how he's different and all that.
[05:20.120 --> 05:28.120]  Well just for an update on that, this so-called different attorney proved his true colors exactly like most attorneys do
[05:28.120 --> 05:32.120]  and he says one thing to your face and another behind your back.
[05:32.120 --> 05:42.120]  Turns out this guy goes to some YouTube video where someone has reposted the Alex Jones show that I did
[05:42.120 --> 05:48.120]  and starts making comments on there calling me a lunatic and all this other kind of stuff.
[05:48.120 --> 05:55.120]  So folks, when I tell you attorneys are absolute total scum of the earth, believe it.
[05:55.120 --> 06:01.120]  They will always lie to your face when it serves them and they will be happy to stab you in the back
[06:01.120 --> 06:07.120]  and do everything they can to make themselves look better than you and good to everyone else
[06:07.120 --> 06:10.120]  if there's any way that they can use that to their advantage.
[06:10.120 --> 06:19.120]  It's basically the scenario in my opinion that these guys don't want people listening to people that aren't a member of their club.
[06:19.120 --> 06:22.120]  We know that of course. They do that on a regular basis.
[06:22.120 --> 06:35.120]  But just FYI, they cannot be trusted. They are habitual liars and hypocrites and this guy is absolutely no exception.
[06:35.120 --> 06:43.120]  So Mr. hide-behind Juan John Gault out there, you've exposed yourself, that's fine.
[06:43.120 --> 06:50.120]  You say you're going to go out on the Internet and do your best to discredit me and show people what kind of guy I am.
[06:50.120 --> 06:54.120]  Be my guest.
[06:54.120 --> 07:00.120]  I have never put forth anything on this show that cannot be verified in black and white.
[07:00.120 --> 07:04.120]  And I have no intention of ever doing so.
[07:04.120 --> 07:10.120]  The fact that it doesn't set well with your collectivist status desires for us
[07:10.120 --> 07:15.120]  so that people like you control the power and the wealth and steal it from the rest of us
[07:15.120 --> 07:22.120]  by hiding how things work behind the scenes instead of how you want us to believe that it does,
[07:22.120 --> 07:25.120]  that's not going to change any of that for me.
[07:25.120 --> 07:32.120]  You're the guy, you're the type that we can do without.
[07:32.120 --> 07:39.120]  Everybody out there that listens to this show, I don't care what your opinion of me is, I really don't.
[07:39.120 --> 07:49.120]  Because the only thing I have ever done is talk about the information that is available to every one of you if you simply go look.
[07:49.120 --> 07:55.120]  The one thing that I have tried to do is to verify every piece of information I put out there.
[07:55.120 --> 08:00.120]  I try to trace it down to its original source as best as I possibly can,
[08:00.120 --> 08:05.120]  and I try to look at the whole picture in a way that says, okay, how come this is this way
[08:05.120 --> 08:11.120]  and how come that is that way when they're supposed to both be dealing with the same thing?
[08:11.120 --> 08:20.120]  And then I'll try to find the pieces that interlace these two things together and try to see if I can reconcile that picture.
[08:20.120 --> 08:24.120]  And that's all I've ever tried to put out there for anyone to do,
[08:24.120 --> 08:30.120]  unlike attorneys who constantly misrepresent what's actually written down in black and white
[08:30.120 --> 08:34.120]  and try to spin it in ways that will suit them at any given time.
[08:34.120 --> 08:48.120]  You, Mr. Gault, as your fake name goes, were bemoaning how much people were insulting you and calling you names.
[08:48.120 --> 08:50.120]  Well, now you know why.
[08:50.120 --> 08:56.120]  Now you know why I personally believe people like you are complete and total scumbag.
[08:56.120 --> 09:00.120]  If there's not something in it for you, you don't care.
[09:00.120 --> 09:06.120]  And someone that is willing to stand up to what you're saying, knowing that it's wrong,
[09:06.120 --> 09:11.120]  you have to try to discredit even when they're not wrong.
[09:11.120 --> 09:16.120]  So more power to you. Good luck, just like I told you.
[09:16.120 --> 09:23.120]  All right, folks, that being said, the phone lines are open, 512-646-1984-0.
[09:23.120 --> 09:29.120]  And just so that we know, Mr. Gault, since I don't like two-faced individuals,
[09:29.120 --> 09:38.120]  don't bother calling into this show ever because I will never give you another minute's air time to lie to people,
[09:38.120 --> 09:43.120]  to make them believe that you're working for good when you're not.
[09:43.120 --> 09:47.120]  So don't bother calling in here trying to defend your comments and your actions
[09:47.120 --> 09:54.120]  because this is not going to be the platform where I ever allow you to lie to folks again, period.
[09:54.120 --> 09:58.120]  All right, for the rest of you that's listening, give us a call, get in line, and let's talk.
[09:58.120 --> 10:01.120]  If you got an issue, let's talk with that too.
[10:01.120 --> 10:09.120]  Now, yesterday in class, I had another encounter with a patronet.
[10:09.120 --> 10:15.120]  And my issues with the patronet is never that they're trying to learn.
[10:15.120 --> 10:20.120]  It is never that their information is simply faulty.
[10:20.120 --> 10:27.120]  It is the tenacity with which they hang on to it and refuse to deal with facts relating to it
[10:27.120 --> 10:33.120]  that either show that their understanding and belief of it is completely false,
[10:33.120 --> 10:39.120]  which I don't use anything again other than basic logic facts and documented evidence
[10:39.120 --> 10:44.120]  and the statutes and laws themselves to show that.
[10:44.120 --> 10:54.120]  But the simple fact of the matter is, is they go absolutely bonkers when you do something to disprove what they're talking about.
[10:54.120 --> 11:00.120]  And I can hear folks like this golf moron out there right now saying, well, what about what you're telling people?
[11:00.120 --> 11:11.120]  Once again, the difference between me and the patronet is that I present my information in black and white up front that I base my argument upon.
[11:11.120 --> 11:16.120]  I don't just make it up out of thin air and then stand there and try to argue about it.
[11:16.120 --> 11:22.120]  Like I said, Juan, go away. You're not getting on this show ever again.
[11:22.120 --> 11:28.120]  I see you on the caller board. Good luck on getting on here because I get to choose who's on here.
[11:28.120 --> 11:33.120]  And you, sir, are a liar, and you will not be on here.
[11:33.120 --> 11:42.120]  Now, on and on with this, everything that I show you, I ask you to go look it up.
[11:42.120 --> 11:49.120]  I've told you time and time again not to take my word for it, and I still say don't take my word for it.
[11:49.120 --> 11:54.120]  If I tell you something, my hope is that you will attempt to challenge and disprove me on it,
[11:54.120 --> 12:01.120]  that you will go out and look and maybe, maybe come up with a different perspective based upon the facts and evidence that I have,
[12:01.120 --> 12:04.120]  and it might actually be a better one than I have.
[12:04.120 --> 12:14.120]  But the fact remains that no matter what happens, if you can show me where I'm wrong about it, that's fine.
[12:14.120 --> 12:20.120]  But at the same time, be willing to accept that you may have missed something that I have found that says,
[12:20.120 --> 12:23.120]  okay, wait a minute, fine, this is what you're reading.
[12:23.120 --> 12:27.120]  But have you looked at this and have you looked at this and have you looked at this over here?
[12:27.120 --> 12:36.120]  And when you look at them all together in that context, does that not change the way that you're reading or viewing or thinking about those things?
[12:36.120 --> 12:42.120]  It's all about study and knowledge and information, people. That's all it's ever been about.
[12:42.120 --> 12:49.120]  All right? The more you know, the less they're able to do to you what they're doing to you in these corrupt criminal courts
[12:49.120 --> 12:59.120]  and this corrupt criminal system that these two-faced attorneys have used to seize control of our country from us.
[12:59.120 --> 13:11.120]  They have devised a legal system that they can control and manipulate so that you and I cannot use it to gain the justice that we have a right to.
[13:11.120 --> 13:21.120]  I mean, let's see, what was this latest opinion by the Ninth Circuit where they took a prior ruling by the Supreme Court that said cops can lie to the public
[13:21.120 --> 13:30.120]  and the Ninth Circuit just wrote an opinion that says the cop can not only lie to you about why he stopped you,
[13:30.120 --> 13:40.120]  but as long as the lie is based upon something that he could use even if it isn't true in this case,
[13:40.120 --> 13:46.120]  then the stop and search is legal. Now, how is that for completely freaking asinine?
[13:46.120 --> 13:56.120]  Basically, they're saying, okay, if you're in a car and a cop fabricates the reason for a traffic stop so that he can do a prelim stop for other purposes,
[13:56.120 --> 14:06.120]  it doesn't matter that he lied about the reason for the stop. It doesn't matter that he lied about whether or not you actually did anything wrong.
[14:06.120 --> 14:14.120]  If it was actually possible for that lie to be feasible, now the stop is legal.
[14:14.120 --> 14:21.120]  And you know who came up with that legal theory? Frickin' attorneys.
[14:21.120 --> 14:31.120]  This system is designed to destroy your rights to increase governmental power, which again is in the hands of the attorneys for the most part.
[14:31.120 --> 14:41.120]  Look at the majority of the public offices being held and the actual occupation of the one holding it and tell me what you find.
[14:41.120 --> 14:49.120]  We have more attorneys in every department of government than we do anything else by percentages at a minimum.
[14:49.120 --> 14:59.120]  The final review of all law before it gets published is by a so-called constitutional attorney to see whether or not it matches up with constitutional principles.
[14:59.120 --> 15:05.120]  Again, a lie. In order for that to be true, you would have to understand constitutional principles,
[15:05.120 --> 15:15.120]  which obviously someone that is willing to bemoan the necessity that everything be done for the good of society and the collection of people,
[15:15.120 --> 15:24.120]  the collectivist mentality, then you don't understand the principles of the Constitution because the Constitution is about individual rights,
[15:24.120 --> 15:30.120]  even in the existence of a society.
[15:30.120 --> 15:39.120]  Yeah, you know why I like quoting Jefferson? Because Jefferson is one of the few people in the Founding Fathers' arguments over this
[15:39.120 --> 15:48.120]  that actually understood individual rights versus collectivist rights, which he immediately said there is no such thing as collective rights.
[15:48.120 --> 16:00.120]  Every right is an individual right. Society has no rights. Only the individuals within society have rights.
[16:00.120 --> 16:08.120]  Those rights are not limited or surrendered simply because one becomes a member of society.
[16:08.120 --> 16:15.120]  Period. I don't care how much you people think it ought to be so, it isn't so.
[16:15.120 --> 16:24.120]  Because the moment society gets to determine what your rights are and which ones you have to give up and which ones you get to keep and exercise,
[16:24.120 --> 16:28.120]  you don't have any.
[16:28.120 --> 16:33.120]  Because if they can do it with one, they can do it with all of them, can't they?
[16:33.120 --> 16:45.120]  That's just common frickin' sense. And this ruling by the Ninth Circuit is a good example of exactly what that collectivist mentality
[16:45.120 --> 16:53.120]  and how governments should be in control of everything we do is detrimental to individual rights.
[16:53.120 --> 17:01.120]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after the break. Y'all hang in there.
[17:01.120 --> 17:06.120]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network?
[17:06.120 --> 17:11.120]  On top of the on-air talents, producers and other hardworking individuals working behind the scenes,
[17:11.120 --> 17:15.120]  Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you.
[17:15.120 --> 17:20.120]  And we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year on our annual fundraisers,
[17:20.120 --> 17:23.120]  which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[17:23.120 --> 17:27.120]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution.
[17:27.120 --> 17:32.120]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks.
[17:32.120 --> 17:35.120]  First prize being a Spike's Skull Lower Receiver.
[17:35.120 --> 17:37.120]  Second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[17:37.120 --> 17:39.120]  Ten rears will receive gift cards from All About Vapor.
[17:39.120 --> 17:45.120]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud.
[17:45.120 --> 17:50.120]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[17:50.120 --> 17:52.120]  The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser.
[17:52.120 --> 17:58.120]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[18:22.120 --> 18:24.120]  Phones, mail, or court summons.
[18:24.120 --> 18:26.120]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:26.120 --> 18:28.120]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[18:28.120 --> 18:33.120]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.120 --> 18:38.120]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.120 --> 18:40.120]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.120 --> 18:46.120]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[18:46.120 --> 18:49.120]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.120 --> 18:57.120]  That's ruleoflawradio.com. Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-m at yahoo.com.
[18:57.120 --> 19:00.120]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:00.120 --> 19:04.120]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:04.120 --> 19:22.120]  Logosradionetwork.com
[19:22.120 --> 19:45.120]  All right, folks, we are back.
[19:45.120 --> 19:52.120]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[19:52.120 --> 19:54.120]  All right, right now we are going to start taking your calls.
[19:54.120 --> 20:02.120]  And the first one up here it appears is, let's see, Larry in Arizona.
[20:02.120 --> 20:05.120]  Larry, what do you got?
[20:05.120 --> 20:06.120]  Good evening, Eddie.
[20:06.120 --> 20:07.120]  Evening, how are you?
[20:07.120 --> 20:10.120]  I have a different question for you tonight instead of traffic.
[20:10.120 --> 20:12.120]  Okay.
[20:12.120 --> 20:18.120]  On July 1st, I had a bill due to the state for a few thousand dollars.
[20:18.120 --> 20:21.120]  So I mailed it on June 29th.
[20:21.120 --> 20:23.120]  A bill due to the state, okay.
[20:23.120 --> 20:27.120]  Yeah, for land lease.
[20:27.120 --> 20:29.120]  So I mailed it on the 29th.
[20:29.120 --> 20:33.120]  I gave it three days to get into their office.
[20:33.120 --> 20:43.120]  And so last week I get a notice from them for a fat penalty and interest
[20:43.120 --> 20:49.120]  saying that it wasn't received in our office on July 1st.
[20:49.120 --> 20:50.120]  So I sent them a letter.
[20:50.120 --> 20:53.120]  I said this is a computer-generated bill.
[20:53.120 --> 20:55.120]  Somebody please validate it.
[20:55.120 --> 21:02.120]  Send me a copy of the envelope with a postmark on it.
[21:02.120 --> 21:08.120]  And tell me about any statutes you have that don't recognize a United States
[21:08.120 --> 21:12.120]  postmark as valid mailing.
[21:12.120 --> 21:16.120]  So they sent me a copy of the envelope.
[21:16.120 --> 21:19.120]  It was postmarked on June 30th.
[21:19.120 --> 21:25.120]  And it was postmarked at a post office just a few miles from their office.
[21:25.120 --> 21:33.120]  But they stamped the envelope that it came into their office on July 5th.
[21:33.120 --> 21:42.120]  And they said Arizona Administrative Code says if it's not in the office by
[21:42.120 --> 21:48.120]  close of business the day it's due, then the penalties apply.
[21:48.120 --> 21:53.120]  Now that seems like a double standard because if they want,
[21:53.120 --> 21:57.120]  they can take the envelope and throw it aside for a couple of days and then
[21:57.120 --> 22:00.120]  mark it and say now you owe us a penalty.
[22:00.120 --> 22:02.120]  Well, that's true enough.
[22:02.120 --> 22:06.120]  But the problem still remains is how do you approve when it arrives in their
[22:06.120 --> 22:07.120]  office.
[22:07.120 --> 22:09.120]  There's something else you need to look at in the statute.
[22:09.120 --> 22:13.120]  What do the statutes specifically say about postmarks in relation to mailings
[22:13.120 --> 22:15.120]  for these types of fees?
[22:15.120 --> 22:23.120]  If it says that it is considered mailed and in their possession once it's
[22:23.120 --> 22:26.120]  postmarked, then they're dead in the water.
[22:26.120 --> 22:31.120]  But if the statute specifically says regardless of the postmark,
[22:31.120 --> 22:35.120]  if it is not received in the office, then that's a different matter.
[22:35.120 --> 22:42.120]  The problem here becomes did you not send this certified mail?
[22:42.120 --> 22:43.120]  No, I didn't.
[22:43.120 --> 22:44.120]  I sent it regular mail.
[22:44.120 --> 22:45.120]  Okay.
[22:45.120 --> 22:48.120]  Why would you send anything to a governmental entity or a financial
[22:48.120 --> 22:54.120]  institution that is not certified mail, especially when it deals with stuff
[22:54.120 --> 22:56.120]  like this?
[22:56.120 --> 23:01.120]  Why would you not do that?
[23:01.120 --> 23:05.120]  Now think about that, but the point being you need to look at what counts as
[23:05.120 --> 23:09.120]  the counting of time in relation to these statutes and these fees.
[23:09.120 --> 23:14.120]  For instance, most places if it is like, for instance, when you do a court
[23:14.120 --> 23:17.120]  filing, which isn't the same thing in any way, shape, or form as far as this
[23:17.120 --> 23:22.120]  goes, but in relation to court filings, a filing is considered received by the
[23:22.120 --> 23:27.120]  court as long as it is, if it's mailed, as long as it is postmarked before
[23:27.120 --> 23:32.120]  midnight the day before it's due.
[23:32.120 --> 23:33.120]  Okay.
[23:33.120 --> 23:35.120]  So what do the statutes say about these fees?
[23:35.120 --> 23:38.120]  When are they considered paid?
[23:38.120 --> 23:42.120]  What is the measure of time according to the statutes?
[23:42.120 --> 23:47.120]  What counts as the first day, the last day, or any good day for counting the
[23:47.120 --> 23:50.120]  measure of time?
[23:50.120 --> 23:55.120]  Well, I mean, it did say it was due July 1st.
[23:55.120 --> 23:56.120]  Wait, wait.
[23:56.120 --> 23:59.120]  What said it was due July 1st?
[23:59.120 --> 24:01.120]  The bill itself.
[24:01.120 --> 24:02.120]  Okay.
[24:02.120 --> 24:03.120]  That's not relevant.
[24:03.120 --> 24:04.120]  The bill is not the law.
[24:04.120 --> 24:07.120]  It's not the law or the statute.
[24:07.120 --> 24:11.120]  Read what those say.
[24:11.120 --> 24:12.120]  Okay.
[24:12.120 --> 24:17.120]  If you mailed it three days prior to the 1st, does the statute say that it is
[24:17.120 --> 24:22.120]  considered received as long as it is postmarked no later than midnight of the
[24:22.120 --> 24:25.120]  day before the day it's due?
[24:25.120 --> 24:30.120]  You need to read the law and the statutes and see what that says.
[24:30.120 --> 24:31.120]  Yeah.
[24:31.120 --> 24:34.120]  The statutes do not address a postmark.
[24:34.120 --> 24:38.120]  I'm not saying anything about a postmark specifically, okay?
[24:38.120 --> 24:42.120]  It could be anything, but the postmark would be one of those indicators.
[24:42.120 --> 24:48.120]  There has to be something in there that says when it's considered due.
[24:48.120 --> 24:52.120]  It may call it something other than a postmark.
[24:52.120 --> 24:54.120]  It may not say postmark in the statute.
[24:54.120 --> 24:58.120]  It may say something else.
[24:58.120 --> 25:04.120]  In the statute, they just reference due date.
[25:04.120 --> 25:10.120]  In the tax code, they honor a postmark, but when it comes to the state land
[25:10.120 --> 25:14.120]  department, they make no mention of a postmark.
[25:14.120 --> 25:19.120]  In any part of the statute or just in the part dealing with these fees?
[25:19.120 --> 25:20.120]  No.
[25:20.120 --> 25:22.120]  But like I say, the Arizona...
[25:22.120 --> 25:23.120]  Wait.
[25:23.120 --> 25:24.120]  What do you mean no?
[25:24.120 --> 25:29.120]  I asked you two different things. Which one are you answering?
[25:29.120 --> 25:30.120]  Oh, okay.
[25:30.120 --> 25:32.120]  Hit me with a question again.
[25:32.120 --> 25:38.120]  Does it say that in every part of the statute relating to these fees or only in
[25:38.120 --> 25:43.120]  the particular section relating to these fees?
[25:43.120 --> 25:44.120]  Only in this section.
[25:44.120 --> 25:45.120]  Okay.
[25:45.120 --> 25:49.120]  Have you read the rest of it is my question.
[25:49.120 --> 25:50.120]  Okay.
[25:50.120 --> 25:56.120]  Under the whole title, the whole Title 37, there is nothing about postmarks.
[25:56.120 --> 26:00.120]  But I'm telling you, it may not call it a postmark.
[26:00.120 --> 26:01.120]  It may say...
[26:01.120 --> 26:06.120]  It may call it something else, such as in stamp received by a United States
[26:06.120 --> 26:10.120]  postal office.
[26:10.120 --> 26:11.120]  Okay?
[26:11.120 --> 26:14.120]  You need to not be looking on just one particular term.
[26:14.120 --> 26:21.120]  The administrative code says it goes by their mark.
[26:21.120 --> 26:23.120]  Whose mark?
[26:23.120 --> 26:33.120]  When the state land department marks it due, that's the time they go by.
[26:33.120 --> 26:34.120]  Okay.
[26:34.120 --> 26:38.120]  But now the problem, even if that is the case and their stamp is the only one
[26:38.120 --> 26:42.120]  that matters, then let's go back to your original question of the conflict of
[26:42.120 --> 26:46.120]  interest and the fact that they could just delay payments in order to collect
[26:46.120 --> 26:48.120]  bigger payments.
[26:48.120 --> 26:50.120]  Yeah.
[26:50.120 --> 26:51.120]  Okay.
[26:51.120 --> 26:54.120]  How are you going to prove that's what they did?
[26:54.120 --> 26:58.120]  How are you going to prove when it got there from when you mailed it if you
[26:58.120 --> 27:01.120]  can't show that the post office delivered it?
[27:01.120 --> 27:04.120]  The only way you're going to be able to make that argument is if you can get a
[27:04.120 --> 27:10.120]  chain of custody from the post office that they show when that was delivered.
[27:10.120 --> 27:14.120]  Then you can say the land office is the one holding it after it's been
[27:14.120 --> 27:22.120]  delivered so that they can fraudulently stamp it and collect late fees.
[27:22.120 --> 27:29.120]  Unless you can prove the exact day it was delivered, that's your problem.
[27:29.120 --> 27:34.120]  That is exactly why you don't send this stuff without it being certified mail
[27:34.120 --> 27:38.120]  return receipt requested.
[27:38.120 --> 27:42.120]  So if I was you, I'd start talking to the post office and see if they can track
[27:42.120 --> 27:47.120]  that particular letter or that payment from when you mailed it to when it got
[27:47.120 --> 27:48.120]  there.
[27:48.120 --> 27:51.120]  Don't ask me how they're going to do it or if they can do it.
[27:51.120 --> 27:53.120]  Ask them.
[27:53.120 --> 27:55.120]  Yeah.
[27:55.120 --> 27:56.120]  Okay.
[27:56.120 --> 27:57.120]  Then I have one other question.
[27:57.120 --> 27:58.120]  Okay.
[27:58.120 --> 27:59.120]  It's election year.
[27:59.120 --> 28:04.120]  So I was reading in the state constitution about elections.
[28:04.120 --> 28:11.120]  And they make a very distinct difference between a voter and a qualified
[28:11.120 --> 28:18.120]  elector, but they don't really explain what the difference between them is.
[28:18.120 --> 28:22.120]  Then you need to go back and do historical research on any case law that dealt
[28:22.120 --> 28:27.120]  with that particular provision of the constitution or any original writings at
[28:27.120 --> 28:30.120]  the time it was written into the constitution so that you understand the
[28:30.120 --> 28:32.120]  meaning of those terms.
[28:32.120 --> 28:38.120]  Like for instance, if that here in Texas, ours is the 1876 that they're using,
[28:38.120 --> 28:44.120]  even though we can show the 1876 is not a valid state constitution in any way,
[28:44.120 --> 28:52.120]  shape, or form, neither was the 1864 or the 1865, those were all done basically
[28:52.120 --> 28:58.120]  as reconstruction constitutions under military rule by the North.
[28:58.120 --> 29:03.120]  Those are not constitutions voted into existence by the people of Texas.
[29:03.120 --> 29:08.120]  They were put into place by the North in control of this part of the country at
[29:08.120 --> 29:10.120]  the time.
[29:10.120 --> 29:12.120]  The people here didn't vote on those constitutions.
[29:12.120 --> 29:19.120]  Our last people established constitution in Texas was the 1836.
[29:19.120 --> 29:25.120]  But regardless of that, look at something like Bouvier's 1856, for example.
[29:25.120 --> 29:29.120]  If those terms are defined there, you would have a good idea of what they meant
[29:29.120 --> 29:34.120]  if the date of your constitution is the 1800s.
[29:34.120 --> 29:35.120]  Oh, okay.
[29:35.120 --> 29:37.120]  Okay.
[29:37.120 --> 29:40.120]  And there is an online version of Bouvier's 1856.
[29:40.120 --> 29:43.120]  Just go online and search for it.
[29:43.120 --> 29:44.120]  Okay.
[29:44.120 --> 29:45.120]  Well, yeah.
[29:45.120 --> 29:51.120]  Our constitution was 1913, and I own a set of Bouvier 1914 dictionaries.
[29:51.120 --> 29:52.120]  Okay.
[29:52.120 --> 29:55.120]  Let's see if those terms are there and what they meant at the time it was created.
[29:55.120 --> 29:58.120]  And look and see if they were in a historical context, too.
[29:58.120 --> 30:00.120]  We'll be right back.
[30:00.120 --> 30:02.120]  Ah, fresh air.
[30:02.120 --> 30:06.120]  Did you know just breathing in a forest can turbocharge your immune system?
[30:06.120 --> 30:09.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and in a moment I'll explain how better health could be
[30:09.120 --> 30:13.120]  as close as your local park.
[30:13.120 --> 30:17.120]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a
[30:17.120 --> 30:20.120]  massive database of your personal information.
[30:20.120 --> 30:21.120]  That's creepy.
[30:21.120 --> 30:23.120]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:23.120 --> 30:26.120]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:26.120 --> 30:30.120]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches,
[30:30.120 --> 30:33.120]  or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[30:33.120 --> 30:37.120]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[30:37.120 --> 30:40.120]  Great search results and total privacy.
[30:40.120 --> 30:43.120]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:43.120 --> 30:48.120]  They're called phytoncides, airborne chemicals released by trees and plants
[30:48.120 --> 30:52.120]  to defend against insects and decay, and breathing them is extraordinarily
[30:52.120 --> 30:53.120]  good for you.
[30:53.120 --> 30:57.120]  Research shows that an hour or two in the woods lowers your blood pressure,
[30:57.120 --> 31:01.120]  slows your pulse rate, helps regulate blood sugar, and reduces stress hormones.
[31:01.120 --> 31:06.120]  Breathing plant-rich air also turbocharges your immune-boosting white blood cells
[31:06.120 --> 31:10.120]  and the body's natural killer cells, with effects lasting up to a week.
[31:10.120 --> 31:15.120]  The Japanese call basking in the woods shinrin-yoku, or forest bathing,
[31:15.120 --> 31:18.120]  and you're doing it whenever you smell that clean forest smell.
[31:18.120 --> 31:21.120]  So the next time you're feeling under the weather, head for the woods
[31:21.120 --> 31:22.120]  and breathe deep.
[31:22.120 --> 31:46.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:52.120 --> 32:01.120]  That saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367 or visit usa.org.
[32:01.120 --> 32:04.120]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[32:04.120 --> 32:07.120]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[32:07.120 --> 32:09.120]  and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:09.120 --> 32:12.120]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.120 --> 32:15.120]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:15.120 --> 32:17.120]  the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly,
[32:17.120 --> 32:19.120]  the right to due process of law.
[32:19.120 --> 32:22.120]  Our traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn
[32:22.120 --> 32:25.120]  how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.120 --> 32:28.120]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:28.120 --> 32:31.120]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:31.120 --> 32:33.120]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:33.120 --> 32:35.120]  and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.120 --> 32:37.120]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:37.120 --> 32:40.120]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.120 --> 32:42.120]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:42.120 --> 32:45.120]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.120 --> 32:47.120]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:47.120 --> 32:50.120]  and hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.120 --> 32:52.120]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[32:52.120 --> 32:54.120]  from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.120 --> 32:57.120]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society
[32:57.120 --> 33:02.120]  we all want and deserve.
[33:02.120 --> 33:14.120]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:14.120 --> 33:20.120]  I got a warrant, and I'm going to solve them
[33:20.120 --> 33:25.120]  through the help of government them, prosecute them.
[33:25.120 --> 33:28.120]  Okay.
[33:28.120 --> 33:31.120]  Who's that?
[33:31.120 --> 33:36.120]  The Texans are a race for distribution.
[33:36.120 --> 33:41.120]  Texans are a race for the chain.
[33:41.120 --> 33:44.120]  Texans are a prosecutor to come and help me.
[33:44.120 --> 33:46.120]  Prosecute them, wicked leader.
[33:46.120 --> 33:49.120]  You see, them are murderers, liars, them tell me.
[33:49.120 --> 33:51.120]  Them are liars, not tell sick stories.
[33:51.120 --> 33:53.120]  Me not believe, me say what them tell me.
[33:53.120 --> 33:56.120]  3% of America vote for Bush.
[33:56.120 --> 33:58.120]  So how the hell he get the presidency?
[33:58.120 --> 34:01.120]  That's why me have a warrant for him.
[34:01.120 --> 34:03.120]  Everybody listen carefully.
[34:03.120 --> 34:05.120]  Listen to the words of the three shoes passing.
[34:05.120 --> 34:14.120]  Texans are a race for distribution.
[34:14.120 --> 34:17.120]  Texans are a race.
[34:17.120 --> 34:19.120]  All right, folks, we are back.
[34:19.120 --> 34:21.120]  This is Rule of Law Radio,
[34:21.120 --> 34:24.120]  and we are still talking with Larry in Arizona.
[34:24.120 --> 34:25.120]  All right, Larry.
[34:25.120 --> 34:28.120]  Now, anyway, what I was saying about the historical context
[34:28.120 --> 34:31.120]  is look and see if those terms date or existed
[34:31.120 --> 34:35.120]  in earlier dated versions of your state constitution,
[34:35.120 --> 34:38.120]  in which case it would still have the same meaning
[34:38.120 --> 34:43.120]  in the 1900 version that it would in the much earlier version.
[34:43.120 --> 34:45.120]  If they keep carrying that term forward,
[34:45.120 --> 34:47.120]  then it's still embodied in the constitution
[34:47.120 --> 34:50.120]  and its original writing.
[34:50.120 --> 34:55.120]  Okay, therefore, it's still embodied in its original meaning.
[34:55.120 --> 34:57.120]  So you may have to go back to the 1800s.
[34:57.120 --> 35:00.120]  Who knows?
[35:00.120 --> 35:01.120]  Yeah, okay, well, I appreciate it.
[35:01.120 --> 35:05.120]  I've never looked it up, and when I saw that,
[35:05.120 --> 35:06.120]  I thought that's funny
[35:06.120 --> 35:09.120]  if there was a definite distinction between the two.
[35:09.120 --> 35:13.120]  Yeah, generally, one was a landholder,
[35:13.120 --> 35:19.120]  and the other was not.
[35:19.120 --> 35:20.120]  Oh, okay.
[35:20.120 --> 35:23.120]  Okay, back in the good old days, so to speak,
[35:23.120 --> 35:27.120]  only landholders could vote on bills
[35:27.120 --> 35:31.120]  that required any sort of money exchange with the government.
[35:31.120 --> 35:34.120]  If the government needed financing for something,
[35:34.120 --> 35:38.120]  only landowners could vote to approve that bill,
[35:38.120 --> 35:39.120]  because the landowners were the ones
[35:39.120 --> 35:41.120]  that had to put up the property for taxes
[35:41.120 --> 35:48.120]  to collect the money to pay that bill.
[35:48.120 --> 35:50.120]  Okay.
[35:50.120 --> 35:52.120]  Okay, well, thank you for the answers.
[35:52.120 --> 35:54.120]  Yes, sir, you have a good evening.
[35:54.120 --> 35:55.120]  Okay, you too.
[35:55.120 --> 35:57.120]  Thank you.
[35:57.120 --> 35:58.120]  All right, bye-bye.
[35:58.120 --> 36:01.120]  All right, now we are going to go to Oliver in Tennessee.
[36:01.120 --> 36:02.120]  Evening, Oliver.
[36:02.120 --> 36:03.120]  How are you?
[36:03.120 --> 36:04.120]  How are you doing?
[36:04.120 --> 36:05.120]  Oh, I'm sorry, Olivier.
[36:05.120 --> 36:06.120]  I keep forgetting that.
[36:06.120 --> 36:08.120]  Comes up here, Oliver, but it's Olivier.
[36:08.120 --> 36:09.120]  I got you.
[36:09.120 --> 36:10.120]  Right.
[36:10.120 --> 36:11.120]  How are you doing?
[36:11.120 --> 36:12.120]  All right, how are you doing?
[36:12.120 --> 36:13.120]  Good, good.
[36:13.120 --> 36:15.120]  Actually, I've been having a real lot of fun.
[36:15.120 --> 36:18.120]  I called you last week, and I told you about
[36:18.120 --> 36:21.120]  when the attorney was telling me, was threatening me
[36:21.120 --> 36:25.120]  and I went to go see him about defending me,
[36:25.120 --> 36:31.120]  and I let him know his place and my place as a master,
[36:31.120 --> 36:34.120]  and I told him that I was going to teach him a lesson
[36:34.120 --> 36:36.120]  about threatening me, right?
[36:36.120 --> 36:37.120]  Yeah.
[36:37.120 --> 36:38.120]  So let's see.
[36:38.120 --> 36:39.120]  That was like Tuesday or Wednesday,
[36:39.120 --> 36:41.120]  so what I did was I went home,
[36:41.120 --> 36:43.120]  I finished up another suit,
[36:43.120 --> 36:45.120]  a second suit that I had started up.
[36:45.120 --> 36:47.120]  I wasn't going to take my time to make sure,
[36:47.120 --> 36:51.120]  but it made me so mad, I went ahead and finished it up,
[36:51.120 --> 36:55.120]  and what I did was when I went to go serve
[36:55.120 --> 36:57.120]  the son of my first suit,
[36:57.120 --> 37:00.120]  I went ahead and just filed a second suit
[37:00.120 --> 37:02.120]  and got him to serve me at the same time.
[37:02.120 --> 37:03.120]  Right.
[37:03.120 --> 37:08.120]  So it was so hilarious when my friend went to go serve
[37:08.120 --> 37:10.120]  his steady attorney.
[37:10.120 --> 37:12.120]  He went up there.
[37:12.120 --> 37:15.120]  They took him upstairs and they told him
[37:15.120 --> 37:18.120]  that he was in a meeting and he wouldn't be able to see him,
[37:18.120 --> 37:20.120]  but he could leave whatever he wanted.
[37:20.120 --> 37:21.120]  He said, well, okay.
[37:21.120 --> 37:24.120]  Well, this is from Marta Sher Olivier.
[37:24.120 --> 37:25.120]  He said, Mr. Olivier?
[37:25.120 --> 37:26.120]  He said, hold on one second.
[37:26.120 --> 37:28.120]  She jumped on the phone.
[37:28.120 --> 37:30.120]  She called because the mayor was in the office
[37:30.120 --> 37:32.120]  with having a meeting.
[37:32.120 --> 37:34.120]  City attorney was having a meeting with the mayor.
[37:34.120 --> 37:35.120]  She jumped on the phone and said,
[37:35.120 --> 37:38.120]  hey, somebody's out here for Marta Sher Olivier.
[37:38.120 --> 37:39.120]  Right.
[37:39.120 --> 37:40.120]  Okay.
[37:40.120 --> 37:41.120]  Yeah, well, wait one second.
[37:41.120 --> 37:43.120]  He'll be right out.
[37:43.120 --> 37:45.120]  As soon as she hung up the phone, he rushed.
[37:45.120 --> 37:47.120]  He ran out of the room.
[37:47.120 --> 37:48.120]  My friend told him.
[37:48.120 --> 37:49.120]  He ran out of the room.
[37:49.120 --> 37:50.120]  He's like, hey.
[37:50.120 --> 37:51.120]  How you doing?
[37:51.120 --> 37:52.120]  He's like, hey, yeah.
[37:52.120 --> 37:54.120]  I have this right here from Marta Sher Olivier.
[37:54.120 --> 37:57.120]  He told me I had to deliver these for him.
[37:57.120 --> 37:59.120]  And he was like, oh.
[37:59.120 --> 38:02.120]  They're like, the city attorney looked at him and said,
[38:02.120 --> 38:03.120]  what's going on?
[38:03.120 --> 38:04.120]  Why are you giving me two of them?
[38:04.120 --> 38:06.120]  He was like, I don't know.
[38:06.120 --> 38:08.120]  This is what I was told to deliver to you.
[38:08.120 --> 38:09.120]  Have a nice day.
[38:09.120 --> 38:11.120]  They're like, what?
[38:11.120 --> 38:13.120]  He pulled them apart.
[38:13.120 --> 38:15.120]  He said that he started looking through the second one,
[38:15.120 --> 38:17.120]  because the first one he already knew what it was,
[38:17.120 --> 38:18.120]  about the card.
[38:18.120 --> 38:20.120]  He said he started looking through the second one.
[38:20.120 --> 38:22.120]  He said when he saw the second one false imprisonment,
[38:22.120 --> 38:23.120]  he started going through it.
[38:23.120 --> 38:25.120]  It was like 47 pages.
[38:25.120 --> 38:28.120]  He said his whole face just stopped.
[38:28.120 --> 38:30.120]  He said his whole face stopped.
[38:30.120 --> 38:31.120]  He was just so depressed.
[38:31.120 --> 38:34.120]  And it was a Friday, Tuesday.
[38:34.120 --> 38:35.120]  It was a Friday.
[38:35.120 --> 38:37.120]  He said, man, that was the greatest.
[38:37.120 --> 38:39.120]  My neighbor said, anytime.
[38:39.120 --> 38:41.120]  He said, can I go deliver the rest of them?
[38:41.120 --> 38:43.120]  Because that was amazing.
[38:43.120 --> 38:46.120]  He said the way his life turned around.
[38:46.120 --> 38:48.120]  And then the funny thing is he had to go walk back
[38:48.120 --> 38:50.120]  in the meeting with the mayor.
[38:50.120 --> 38:52.120]  He was in the meeting with the mayor.
[38:52.120 --> 38:54.120]  So it was like perfect timing.
[38:54.120 --> 38:55.120]  Yeah.
[38:55.120 --> 38:57.120]  Mr. Mayor, I hate to tell you,
[38:57.120 --> 39:00.120]  but he's coming after you for everything.
[39:00.120 --> 39:02.120]  Exactly.
[39:02.120 --> 39:05.120]  So that was very hilarious.
[39:05.120 --> 39:09.120]  When we went to the subpoena served at the towing company,
[39:09.120 --> 39:11.120]  they was acting like big shots.
[39:11.120 --> 39:13.120]  They were like, oh, yeah, bring it down.
[39:13.120 --> 39:15.120]  But they didn't know what it was.
[39:15.120 --> 39:17.120]  So when my neighbor went down there to bring it down to him,
[39:17.120 --> 39:20.120]  when he handed it in the packet and he touched it,
[39:20.120 --> 39:21.120]  he was like, what?
[39:21.120 --> 39:22.120]  He said his whole life changed.
[39:22.120 --> 39:24.120]  He was like, what?
[39:24.120 --> 39:26.120]  They're like, I told you I was coming this year.
[39:26.120 --> 39:30.120]  It's a lawsuit from Mr. Liddy.
[39:30.120 --> 39:32.120]  He started looking at it.
[39:32.120 --> 39:34.120]  And I was in the car watching him.
[39:34.120 --> 39:36.120]  It was so surreal.
[39:36.120 --> 39:39.120]  Went from joking on top of the world to oh, my God,
[39:39.120 --> 39:41.120]  what the hell are we going to do?
[39:41.120 --> 39:43.120]  Yeah, somebody actually followed through
[39:43.120 --> 39:46.120]  and took us to task for our thievery.
[39:46.120 --> 39:48.120]  Well, good job, man.
[39:48.120 --> 39:49.120]  Yeah.
[39:49.120 --> 39:56.120]  But now what do I do about I got I'm getting everybody in court.
[39:56.120 --> 39:58.120]  I want to all these suits.
[39:58.120 --> 40:00.120]  How bad is it hurting them?
[40:00.120 --> 40:02.120]  What is it doing?
[40:02.120 --> 40:05.120]  Well, it depends on what your suit alleges
[40:05.120 --> 40:07.120]  and what you're after them for.
[40:07.120 --> 40:10.120]  I haven't read it, so I don't know any of that for certain
[40:10.120 --> 40:12.120]  as far as the different things.
[40:12.120 --> 40:16.120]  But what exactly do you mean by how bad is it hurting them?
[40:16.120 --> 40:19.120]  Let's say because I have false imprisonment suit on one,
[40:19.120 --> 40:23.120]  and the other one is about them taking property.
[40:23.120 --> 40:30.120]  But in the suit, all the narratives go back to misuse of policy
[40:30.120 --> 40:35.120]  or interpretation of law deliberately.
[40:35.120 --> 40:38.120]  Yeah, knowing and willful violation of rights under color of law.
[40:38.120 --> 40:39.120]  Right.
[40:39.120 --> 40:41.120]  But I have like six more suits to write.
[40:41.120 --> 40:45.120]  That's why I'm dropping them consecutively.
[40:45.120 --> 40:47.120]  Should I spread them out?
[40:47.120 --> 40:52.120]  Well, it's all dependent upon what you the more you have in the fire,
[40:52.120 --> 40:55.120]  so to speak, the more pokers you've got in the fire,
[40:55.120 --> 40:58.120]  the more carefully you have to watch each one.
[40:58.120 --> 41:01.120]  So the problem with having too many floating around out there
[41:01.120 --> 41:03.120]  is you get scheduling conflicts.
[41:03.120 --> 41:04.120]  That's your first problem.
[41:04.120 --> 41:09.120]  You miss an important hearing in one because you've been scheduled for another,
[41:09.120 --> 41:13.120]  and the judges don't have to be considerate in setting your scheduling.
[41:13.120 --> 41:16.120]  So they could wind up causing you to lose one
[41:16.120 --> 41:19.120]  because you have a conflict in the timeframe of another.
[41:19.120 --> 41:21.120]  So the more of those you have,
[41:21.120 --> 41:25.120]  that's one thing you've got to consider when you're doing everything yourself.
[41:25.120 --> 41:28.120]  It's different if you've got a team of attorneys that you've got several
[41:28.120 --> 41:30.120]  can go in different directions at once.
[41:30.120 --> 41:34.120]  But when it's just you, that's a whole lot bigger juggling act.
[41:34.120 --> 41:35.120]  Okay.
[41:35.120 --> 41:40.120]  So as far as that goes, be careful of your statute of limitations.
[41:40.120 --> 41:41.120]  Okay.
[41:41.120 --> 41:45.120]  So you're telling me to write them up and watch my schedule
[41:45.120 --> 41:50.120]  and deliver them towards the end of the...
[41:50.120 --> 41:52.120]  Well, as long as you're within your statute of limitations,
[41:52.120 --> 41:55.120]  face them out as best you can would be my suggestion,
[41:55.120 --> 41:58.120]  simply so that those conflicts don't arise.
[41:58.120 --> 42:04.120]  And what I would try to do if I do have multiple ones floating around out there
[42:04.120 --> 42:11.120]  is try to keep each court apprised of the so far scheduled docket in the other courts.
[42:11.120 --> 42:15.120]  That way the court is looking at this and going, now, wait a minute.
[42:15.120 --> 42:18.120]  And that's also important why you should go in there
[42:18.120 --> 42:20.120]  every time they have a scheduling hearing or something like that
[42:20.120 --> 42:23.120]  where they say, okay, when should the next thing be?
[42:23.120 --> 42:27.120]  Carry copies of your already scheduled cases in there so that you can show the court
[42:27.120 --> 42:30.120]  you're not just making up a conflict so to get more time.
[42:30.120 --> 42:33.120]  You can say, look, Judge, I've got a scheduled docket hearing over here
[42:33.120 --> 42:38.120]  or a motions hearing or whatever hearing over here in this court on this day at this time.
[42:38.120 --> 42:42.120]  So I would ask the court to consider that I can't do it on this date
[42:42.120 --> 42:45.120]  and I can't do it on this date, so can we set it for this date?
[42:45.120 --> 42:48.120]  The same thing that attorneys do when...
[42:48.120 --> 42:50.120]  Exactly, it's exactly the same thing they do,
[42:50.120 --> 42:54.120]  but they get a lot more consideration in those instances than you do
[42:54.120 --> 42:57.120]  because they're getting paid in each of these and you're not.
[42:57.120 --> 42:59.120]  They could care less if you win.
[42:59.120 --> 43:06.120]  But as a member of their club, they can't be impacting the salary of the other guy.
[43:06.120 --> 43:07.120]  Okay?
[43:07.120 --> 43:10.120]  If he can come up with a good reason, that is provided they like him, of course,
[43:10.120 --> 43:12.120]  and he's willing to kiss their butt on a regular basis,
[43:12.120 --> 43:16.120]  then they'll give him some consideration.
[43:16.120 --> 43:21.120]  I mean, have you seen the movie The Lincoln Lawyer with Matthew McConaughey?
[43:21.120 --> 43:22.120]  Lincoln Lawyer, no.
[43:22.120 --> 43:26.120]  You need to watch that if for no other reason than this one scene.
[43:26.120 --> 43:32.120]  He's got a guy who's a dope grower for this motorcycle game, right?
[43:32.120 --> 43:33.120]  Mm-hmm.
[43:33.120 --> 43:37.120]  All right, and he's currently locked up in jail waiting for trial.
[43:37.120 --> 43:40.120]  Hang on to that thought and I'll finish that on the other side
[43:40.120 --> 43:43.120]  and go through the description with you and you'll see what I'm talking about.
[43:43.120 --> 43:46.120]  Hang on just a minute and we'll be right back on the other side.
[43:46.120 --> 43:50.120]  Folks, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[43:50.120 --> 43:54.120]  Get in line and let's talk and we'll finish up with Olivier when we get back.
[43:54.120 --> 44:01.120]  So y'all hang in there.
[44:01.120 --> 44:04.120]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.120 --> 44:07.120]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[44:07.120 --> 44:15.120]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.120 --> 44:19.120]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.120 --> 44:23.120]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.120 --> 44:28.120]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[44:28.120 --> 44:34.120]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.120 --> 44:40.120]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles
[44:40.120 --> 44:43.120]  and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.120 --> 44:49.120]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.120 --> 44:52.120]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.120 --> 45:01.120]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.120 --> 45:07.120]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com
[45:07.120 --> 45:12.120]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street Sweet D
[45:12.120 --> 45:15.120]  here in Austin, Texas, buying Brave New Books and Chase Bank
[45:15.120 --> 45:19.120]  to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.120 --> 45:23.120]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.120 --> 45:27.120]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Eme oil,
[45:27.120 --> 45:31.120]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.120 --> 45:38.120]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.120 --> 45:44.120]  That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.120 --> 45:48.120]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.120 --> 46:15.120]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:15.120 --> 46:30.120]  All right, folks, we are back and we are talking with Olivier.
[46:30.120 --> 46:31.120]  All right, Olivier, go ahead.
[46:31.120 --> 46:34.120]  Now, back to the Lincoln Lawyer movie.
[46:34.120 --> 46:40.120]  Anyhow, this drug dealer that McConaughey is defending is in jail
[46:40.120 --> 46:46.120]  and McConaughey is telling him, he says, look, I'm helping you out here and you guys owe me money.
[46:46.120 --> 46:47.120]  You need to pay me.
[46:47.120 --> 46:49.120]  And the guy is like, well, I called my boys.
[46:49.120 --> 46:51.120]  They're supposed to be giving you money.
[46:51.120 --> 46:52.120]  He's going, well, that's the problem.
[46:52.120 --> 46:54.120]  I ain't got the money.
[46:54.120 --> 46:56.120]  And he goes, well, you can't just quit.
[46:56.120 --> 46:58.120]  I looked it up, man.
[46:58.120 --> 47:01.120]  And McConaughey is like, watch and learn.
[47:01.120 --> 47:06.120]  Takes him up to the courtroom and the judge asks him if they're ready to set this for trial.
[47:06.120 --> 47:15.120]  McConaughey says, no, Your Honor, I am attempting to locate a necessary witness for this case, Mr. Green.
[47:15.120 --> 47:18.120]  Now, do you want to imagine what that's code for?
[47:18.120 --> 47:24.120]  And both the judge and the prosecuting attorney look at each other and they go, how long do you think you need?
[47:24.120 --> 47:28.120]  Oh, I don't know, 30 days, Your Honor.
[47:28.120 --> 47:33.120]  And he looks over to the prosecutor and the prosecutor goes, the state has no problem with that, Your Honor.
[47:33.120 --> 47:38.120]  And they send the guy right back to jail for another 30 days or until he gets paid.
[47:38.120 --> 47:40.120]  See how this works?
[47:40.120 --> 47:43.120]  So that's the issue here.
[47:43.120 --> 47:50.120]  They know how to keep each other in the black, so to speak.
[47:50.120 --> 47:52.120]  So never think they don't.
[47:52.120 --> 47:55.120]  They use lots of little tricks like that in courtroom.
[47:55.120 --> 47:56.120]  I've watched them do it.
[47:56.120 --> 47:58.120]  I've listened to them do it.
[47:58.120 --> 48:05.120]  And I've been to court with attorneys as a paralegal and listened to this and said, OK.
[48:05.120 --> 48:09.120]  And I'll be going, why did he use that particular phrasing?
[48:09.120 --> 48:13.120]  And the attorney I was with is like, well, this is one.
[48:13.120 --> 48:14.120]  And he would explain it.
[48:14.120 --> 48:16.120]  They talk and code all the damn time.
[48:16.120 --> 48:25.120]  And you will never know it if you don't realize that something they said doesn't exactly fit.
[48:25.120 --> 48:27.120]  So be aware of that.
[48:27.120 --> 48:28.120]  They pay attention.
[48:28.120 --> 48:33.120]  This is one of the reasons why I tell people when they go to court, listen to what you're hearing.
[48:33.120 --> 48:34.120]  Process it.
[48:34.120 --> 48:43.120]  Don't treat it like you're watching an episode of Peanuts and they're Charlie Brown's parents in the background.
[48:43.120 --> 48:53.120]  You know, you have to listen to what they're saying so that you can fully analyze it and do something with it.
[48:53.120 --> 48:54.120]  All right.
[48:54.120 --> 49:01.120]  Now, as it goes, it sounds like you're picking up a lot of mud from the bottom, which is good.
[49:01.120 --> 49:04.120]  Just don't get lost in it.
[49:04.120 --> 49:10.120]  The cops, when they come around the corner, they just turn around.
[49:10.120 --> 49:16.120]  Well, when a cop finds out that he may actually wind up being the reason they lost a lot of money
[49:16.120 --> 49:22.120]  until they get cleared in such a way they think they're untouchable, that's generally the way it works.
[49:22.120 --> 49:25.120]  And I've had lots of cops say, I've been sued lots of times.
[49:25.120 --> 49:26.120]  Really?
[49:26.120 --> 49:28.120]  Well, let's see if that's true.
[49:28.120 --> 49:34.120]  And then that tune's like, I ain't never been sued before once I actually do get sued.
[49:34.120 --> 49:40.120]  I mean, like a lot of people that think that they're immune to being held accountable,
[49:40.120 --> 49:47.120]  which in a lot of ways they are and they shouldn't be, but once you actually follow through,
[49:47.120 --> 49:50.120]  that bluster tends to go away a lot of times.
[49:50.120 --> 49:53.120]  It's the ones where it doesn't go away you got to watch out for,
[49:53.120 --> 50:00.120]  because they're the ones that truly believe they're untouchable, even if they know they did wrong.
[50:00.120 --> 50:03.120]  And those are the ones you got to watch out for sneaking up on you in the middle of the night,
[50:03.120 --> 50:09.120]  planting evidence or threatening you in an alley or harassing your family or stuff like that.
[50:09.120 --> 50:12.120]  Those are the ones you really got to watch out for.
[50:12.120 --> 50:15.120]  Right.
[50:15.120 --> 50:18.120]  What?
[50:18.120 --> 50:26.120]  I realize even if, let's say the suit falls through, it's putting them in perspectives.
[50:26.120 --> 50:27.120]  Well, my father's a prisoner.
[50:27.120 --> 50:29.120]  I already beat the charges and it's already written.
[50:29.120 --> 50:32.120]  I got plenty of cases, so I don't see how that's going to fall through.
[50:32.120 --> 50:33.120]  Just pay me.
[50:33.120 --> 50:34.120]  Yeah, exactly.
[50:34.120 --> 50:35.120]  And the same thing here in Texas.
[50:35.120 --> 50:38.120]  These guys are constantly taking people directly to jail,
[50:38.120 --> 50:42.120]  where the Texas case law is extremely clear that that is not an option.
[50:42.120 --> 50:48.120]  If you arrest somebody morning, noon or night, especially for a Class C fine only,
[50:48.120 --> 50:55.120]  you are required, even the statute says, to deliver them immediately before a magistrate.
[50:55.120 --> 50:58.120]  Now, can the magistrate be in the jail?
[50:58.120 --> 51:01.120]  Because I was reading where it said that he had to be.
[51:01.120 --> 51:04.120]  Doesn't matter where the magistrate is.
[51:04.120 --> 51:09.120]  The issue becomes whether or not they lock you up in there before you have seen them
[51:09.120 --> 51:12.120]  and the magistrate has signed a commitment order.
[51:12.120 --> 51:17.120]  If they lock you up in there without taking you before that magistrate,
[51:17.120 --> 51:20.120]  they are in violation of the statute.
[51:20.120 --> 51:23.120]  The case law here is very clear about that.
[51:23.120 --> 51:28.120]  The officer has no authority to incarcerate.
[51:28.120 --> 51:35.120]  No independent individual has determined whether or not the officer's facts
[51:35.120 --> 51:40.120]  are indeed facts that allow him to do what he did,
[51:40.120 --> 51:46.120]  because he did it without a warrant, which on its face is unlawful.
[51:46.120 --> 51:52.120]  Hence the reason a neutral and detached magistrate is required to make that determination,
[51:52.120 --> 51:55.120]  not the cops themselves.
[51:55.120 --> 51:59.120]  So what happens when the magistrate makes that determination?
[51:59.120 --> 52:01.120]  As long as he signs a commitment order
[52:01.120 --> 52:07.120]  and it's something that he is authorized to commit you to jail for, then that's that.
[52:07.120 --> 52:09.120]  At least they followed proper procedure.
[52:09.120 --> 52:17.120]  But the thing is, it's illogical to say that they can sit in you to be incarcerated
[52:17.120 --> 52:24.120]  for whatever reason when the punishment for the offense itself is by fine only,
[52:24.120 --> 52:29.120]  that you could never be incarcerated even if you were found guilty of the act.
[52:29.120 --> 52:34.120]  Therefore, how can it be reasonable under the constitutional meaning of that term
[52:34.120 --> 52:39.120]  to say, lock him up until he pays?
[52:39.120 --> 52:40.120]  Okay.
[52:40.120 --> 52:46.120]  Let's say if you get the charge dismissed.
[52:46.120 --> 52:55.120]  Now, is paying bail, is that excessive bail and fines and fees?
[52:55.120 --> 53:00.120]  Well, it depends on what the courts have defined as excessive or if it's an excess
[53:00.120 --> 53:03.120]  of what the statute specifically authorizes.
[53:03.120 --> 53:10.120]  Well, if you prove that you were never in the statutory scheme that they locked you up for,
[53:10.120 --> 53:15.120]  I mean, that means if you were never in that category, everything that they put...
[53:15.120 --> 53:19.120]  Well, that doesn't set the standard for what's excessive, though.
[53:19.120 --> 53:20.120]  Okay.
[53:20.120 --> 53:29.120]  Now, a lawyer might try to convey it into something else like an unlawful taking.
[53:29.120 --> 53:32.120]  What did you get in exchange for the taking of your bond?
[53:32.120 --> 53:36.120]  Your freedom, which shouldn't have been taken in the first place, right?
[53:36.120 --> 53:37.120]  Right.
[53:37.120 --> 53:38.120]  Okay.
[53:38.120 --> 53:40.120]  So even though you got your freedom in exchange for the bond,
[53:40.120 --> 53:43.120]  you should have never had your freedom taken in the first place.
[53:43.120 --> 53:45.120]  Therefore, the bond was a ransom to get out.
[53:45.120 --> 53:47.120]  That's one way to possibly look at it.
[53:47.120 --> 53:50.120]  Whether or not the case law and the statutes would support that, however,
[53:50.120 --> 53:54.120]  or the underlying law rather than the statutes, is another matter.
[53:54.120 --> 53:56.120]  That's why you've got to look at it.
[53:56.120 --> 54:00.120]  Any reasonable person could look at this and say this is wrong,
[54:00.120 --> 54:02.120]  but attorneys are not reasonable people.
[54:02.120 --> 54:07.120]  Attorneys are shysters that make a living off of the misery they invoke for others
[54:07.120 --> 54:12.120]  to suffer through while they reap a profit from it.
[54:12.120 --> 54:13.120]  Okay.
[54:13.120 --> 54:16.120]  I got one more question.
[54:16.120 --> 54:17.120]  I beat a suit.
[54:17.120 --> 54:18.120]  I mean, I got arrested.
[54:18.120 --> 54:20.120]  I beat him in court.
[54:20.120 --> 54:24.120]  I filed false imprisonment suit against him.
[54:24.120 --> 54:28.120]  Well, now if you beat it, you've also got malicious prosecution you can add to that.
[54:28.120 --> 54:31.120]  No, I'm going to send you the suit.
[54:31.120 --> 54:32.120]  I got a lot of it.
[54:32.120 --> 54:33.120]  Okay.
[54:33.120 --> 54:35.120]  But I'm trying to improvise it.
[54:35.120 --> 54:38.120]  So I'll send you the suit so you can see how detailed it is.
[54:38.120 --> 54:39.120]  Okay.
[54:39.120 --> 54:44.120]  But before I filed the suit, after the day that I got the charge dismissed,
[54:44.120 --> 54:48.120]  I went to the police station and tried to file a complaint,
[54:48.120 --> 54:52.120]  and the chief told me that he was not going to accept the complaint,
[54:52.120 --> 54:54.120]  and I have it on video.
[54:54.120 --> 54:57.120]  He's not going to accept the complaint.
[54:57.120 --> 55:02.120]  It's more than 30 days, and that's all.
[55:02.120 --> 55:03.120]  Okay.
[55:03.120 --> 55:07.120]  You realize that if they committed felonious acts against you
[55:07.120 --> 55:10.120]  when they did what they did and wound up having to dismiss it,
[55:10.120 --> 55:14.120]  then the chief refusing to take the complaint could be considered
[55:14.120 --> 55:18.120]  misprison or felony, but now that's a federal offense.
[55:18.120 --> 55:21.120]  Here it would have to be co-conspirator, aiding and abetting,
[55:21.120 --> 55:25.120]  something like that within the state.
[55:25.120 --> 55:31.120]  But when the police chief covers for the criminal acts of his subordinates,
[55:31.120 --> 55:33.120]  he's aiding and abetting.
[55:33.120 --> 55:34.120]  Okay.
[55:34.120 --> 55:40.120]  Is that all you're doing?
[55:40.120 --> 55:42.120]  That depends.
[55:42.120 --> 55:46.120]  Without knowing the exact facts of everything, I can't answer that.
[55:46.120 --> 55:50.120]  Knowing what the laws are, particularly in relation to what they're required to do
[55:50.120 --> 55:52.120]  versus what they didn't do, I can't really answer that.
[55:52.120 --> 55:55.120]  He could be doing other things.
[55:55.120 --> 55:57.120]  Let's say, for instance, here in Texas,
[55:57.120 --> 56:01.120]  had they physically committed felonious acts against you,
[56:01.120 --> 56:05.120]  let's say, for instance, here in Texas, had they physically assaulted you
[56:05.120 --> 56:08.120]  to arrest you and the arrest itself was unlawful,
[56:08.120 --> 56:10.120]  they committed aggravated assault.
[56:10.120 --> 56:12.120]  They committed aggravated kidnapping.
[56:12.120 --> 56:16.120]  Those are first-degree felonies in Texas if you're a public servant
[56:16.120 --> 56:19.120]  displaying a deadly weapon when you commit that act.
[56:19.120 --> 56:25.120]  I wrote all of that in my suit, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated.
[56:25.120 --> 56:28.120]  Well, the thing is, is that's the crime they're committing,
[56:28.120 --> 56:30.120]  but that is not necessarily your cause of action.
[56:30.120 --> 56:32.120]  You've got to remember that.
[56:32.120 --> 56:36.120]  They've also set this up where when you file a civil lawsuit,
[56:36.120 --> 56:40.120]  you may not have a cause of action for every single thing they did.
[56:40.120 --> 56:41.120]  Right.
[56:41.120 --> 56:42.120]  Okay?
[56:42.120 --> 56:46.120]  So you need to find out what the viable causes of action in your particular state are
[56:46.120 --> 56:49.120]  in relation to the crimes they committed,
[56:49.120 --> 56:52.120]  because they're not necessarily one and the same.
[56:52.120 --> 56:57.120]  A criminal act does not automatically invoke a civil sanction that you can sue for.
[56:57.120 --> 56:59.120]  That's not right, in my opinion.
[56:59.120 --> 57:03.120]  But once again, this is the way the attorneys have set it up.
[57:03.120 --> 57:07.120]  But during my, I mean, during my investigation,
[57:07.120 --> 57:12.120]  during the case background, I found suits,
[57:12.120 --> 57:18.120]  I found earlier suits that sued and weren't in that fashion.
[57:18.120 --> 57:21.120]  Yeah, and you may have, but what you've got to make sure of
[57:21.120 --> 57:24.120]  is that those cases have not been overturned.
[57:24.120 --> 57:27.120]  They may have won in that era, in that time,
[57:27.120 --> 57:30.120]  but that doesn't mean that that case hasn't since been overruled by another.
[57:30.120 --> 57:33.120]  That's why you have to jeopardize them.
[57:33.120 --> 57:34.120]  Okay.
[57:34.120 --> 57:35.120]  All right.
[57:35.120 --> 57:42.120]  What mindset do I need to go to investigate how to press charges against the chief?
[57:42.120 --> 57:44.120]  Because I feel like if I put chief...
[57:44.120 --> 57:48.120]  Go directly to the United States Attorney General and the DOJ.
[57:48.120 --> 57:51.120]  If the chief of police is not willing to accept it,
[57:51.120 --> 57:56.120]  go to either a higher state law enforcement agency that can accept it against the locals
[57:56.120 --> 58:02.120]  or go directly to the United States Attorney, your local grand jury, any of those.
[58:02.120 --> 58:03.120]  No, I filed it. I filed it.
[58:03.120 --> 58:12.120]  I mean, they let me submit it, but I wanted to, I wanted to sing them just for saying no.
[58:12.120 --> 58:13.120]  You can do that too.
[58:13.120 --> 58:15.120]  Again, you can accuse the chief of aiding and abetting.
[58:15.120 --> 58:20.120]  You can accuse the chief of misprision of felony and file those charges.
[58:20.120 --> 58:23.120]  If you've got a recording, attach a copy of it to it.
[58:23.120 --> 58:27.120]  You make a certified copy of it, which you can do with a notary.
[58:27.120 --> 58:29.120]  All you got to do is make a duplicate, write out an affidavit saying,
[58:29.120 --> 58:33.120]  this is a certified copy of this recording on this date and this time.
[58:33.120 --> 58:40.120]  Put a proper jurat on it, get it notarized, and send it to the grand jury along with the complaint.
[58:40.120 --> 58:41.120]  All right.
[58:41.120 --> 58:43.120]  All right, Olivier, I've got to take a break here, man,
[58:43.120 --> 58:46.120]  but let me get to my next caller unless you've got something else, all right?
[58:46.120 --> 58:47.120]  Hang in there.
[58:47.120 --> 58:48.120]  No, that's it.
[58:48.120 --> 58:50.120]  All right. Bye-bye.
[58:50.120 --> 58:53.120]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:53.120 --> 58:58.120]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.120 --> 59:01.120]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:01.120 --> 59:06.120]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:06.120 --> 59:09.120]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.120 --> 59:13.120]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.120 --> 59:18.120]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.120 --> 59:22.120]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.120 --> 59:28.120]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.120 --> 59:33.120]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.120 --> 59:43.120]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.120 --> 59:47.120]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.120 --> 59:50.120]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.120 --> 01:00:00.120]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.120 --> 01:00:05.120]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown,
[01:00:05.120 --> 01:00:08.120]  providing the jelly bulletins for the commodity market,
[01:00:08.120 --> 01:00:12.120]  today in history, news updates,
[01:00:12.120 --> 01:00:17.120]  and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives.
[01:00:17.120 --> 01:00:25.120]  Markets for Wednesday, the 27th of July, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,327.05 an ounce,
[01:00:25.120 --> 01:00:31.120]  silver, $19.95 an ounce, Texas crude, $42.92 a barrel,
[01:00:31.120 --> 01:00:41.120]  and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 658 U.S. currency.
[01:00:41.120 --> 01:00:44.120]  Today in history, the year 1929,
[01:00:44.120 --> 01:00:49.120]  the Geneva Convention dealing with the treatment of prisoners of war is signed by 53 nations.
[01:00:49.120 --> 01:00:53.120]  Its provisions dealt mostly with the capture and captivity of prisoners of war
[01:00:53.120 --> 01:00:56.120]  and the classification and treatment of civilians during war.
[01:00:56.120 --> 01:01:04.120]  The 1929 Geneva Convention agreement was signed today in history.
[01:01:04.120 --> 01:01:08.120]  In recent news, Julie Assange, via his anonymous whistleblower site,
[01:01:08.120 --> 01:01:12.120]  released 20,000 hacked emails from the Democratic National Convention on Friday, July 22,
[01:01:12.120 --> 01:01:15.120]  days before the commencement of the convention on Monday,
[01:01:15.120 --> 01:01:18.120]  allowing it to be disseminated and read over the weekend.
[01:01:18.120 --> 01:01:21.120]  The emails were so embarrassingly damning that they resulted in Debbie Schultz,
[01:01:21.120 --> 01:01:23.120]  the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee,
[01:01:23.120 --> 01:01:26.120]  resigning on Sunday, a day before the opening ceremonies.
[01:01:26.120 --> 01:01:29.120]  Amongst the litany of embarrassing emails leaked by WikiLeaks,
[01:01:29.120 --> 01:01:33.120]  there were emails from January 2015 to May 2016,
[01:01:33.120 --> 01:01:36.120]  where DNC staff essentially preselected Hillary for the nomination,
[01:01:36.120 --> 01:01:40.120]  discussing how to deal with Bernie Sanders in order to ensure Clinton's nomination
[01:01:40.120 --> 01:01:42.120]  long before any votes had been cast.
[01:01:42.120 --> 01:01:46.120]  The bulk of released emails come from seven prominent DNC staff members,
[01:01:46.120 --> 01:01:50.120]  Senior Advisor Andrew Wright, National Finance Director Jordan Kaplan,
[01:01:50.120 --> 01:01:54.120]  Finance Chief of Staff Scott Comer, Northern California Finance Director Robert Stowe,
[01:01:54.120 --> 01:01:58.120]  Finance Director of Data and Strategic Initiatives Daniel Parrish,
[01:01:58.120 --> 01:02:01.120]  Finance Director Alan Zachary, and Miranda.
[01:02:01.120 --> 01:02:03.120]  Amongst the emails was one dated May 5,
[01:02:03.120 --> 01:02:06.120]  where the Chief Financial Officer of the Democratic National Committee,
[01:02:06.120 --> 01:02:09.120]  Brad Marshall, suggested attacking Sanders over his Jewish heritage,
[01:02:09.120 --> 01:02:12.120]  contrasted to his atheistic tendencies.
[01:02:12.120 --> 01:02:17.120]  This WikiLeak release comes weeks after hacker Guccifer2.0 had released several internal memos
[01:02:17.120 --> 01:02:21.120]  showing that the DNC staff were strategizing to make Clinton the presidential nominee,
[01:02:21.120 --> 01:02:23.120]  as early as March 2015.
[01:02:23.120 --> 01:02:27.120]  This release was followed by a class action lawsuit against Debbie Schultz
[01:02:27.120 --> 01:02:31.120]  and the DNC in June by Florida-based law firm Beck and Lee.
[01:02:31.120 --> 01:02:35.120]  If this wasn't enough, an email dated May 6 from the DNC digital office
[01:02:35.120 --> 01:02:38.120]  and Obama campaign veteran Rebecca Christopher read,
[01:02:38.120 --> 01:02:41.120]  quote, attached to the script for a new video we'd like to use
[01:02:41.120 --> 01:02:43.120]  to mop up some of the more Taco Bull engagement
[01:02:43.120 --> 01:02:46.120]  and demonstrate that Trump actually isn't trying.
[01:02:46.120 --> 01:02:50.120]  It is yet unclear whether she was referring to Donald Trump's Cinco de Mayo tweet
[01:02:50.120 --> 01:02:54.120]  or to the Hispanic voting constituents as the Taco Bell engagement.
[01:02:54.120 --> 01:03:01.120]  This was Brooke Roadie with your Lowdown for July 27, 2016.
[01:03:24.120 --> 01:03:39.120]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:39.120 --> 01:03:41.120]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:41.120 --> 01:03:46.120]  Call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:03:46.120 --> 01:03:49.120]  All right, now let's see who else do we have here.
[01:03:49.120 --> 01:03:51.120]  Jermaine in Tennessee.
[01:03:51.120 --> 01:03:53.120]  Jermaine, go ahead.
[01:03:53.120 --> 01:03:55.120]  Hello, hello?
[01:03:55.120 --> 01:03:56.120]  Yeah, go ahead.
[01:03:56.120 --> 01:03:58.120]  Hey, how you doing?
[01:03:58.120 --> 01:04:00.120]  I'm out of Memphis, Tennessee.
[01:04:00.120 --> 01:04:03.120]  I know the county that the guy was talking about,
[01:04:03.120 --> 01:04:05.120]  the last guy you was just talking to,
[01:04:05.120 --> 01:04:09.120]  I know the county that he's dealing with, they are definitely corrupt up there
[01:04:09.120 --> 01:04:12.120]  because they're trying to extort from me now.
[01:04:12.120 --> 01:04:14.120]  Well, I got a situation.
[01:04:14.120 --> 01:04:15.120]  Okay.
[01:04:15.120 --> 01:04:18.120]  My situation was back in 2012.
[01:04:18.120 --> 01:04:19.120]  All right.
[01:04:19.120 --> 01:04:20.120]  I had got off work.
[01:04:20.120 --> 01:04:23.120]  I got a class ACDF.
[01:04:23.120 --> 01:04:24.120]  I'm a truck driver.
[01:04:24.120 --> 01:04:25.120]  Right.
[01:04:25.120 --> 01:04:26.120]  Got off work.
[01:04:26.120 --> 01:04:29.120]  Then my prime uncle Bill, I picked my son up.
[01:04:29.120 --> 01:04:31.120]  It was like 3 in the morning.
[01:04:31.120 --> 01:04:32.120]  I was back in 2012.
[01:04:32.120 --> 01:04:34.120]  He was 6 years old at the time.
[01:04:34.120 --> 01:04:38.120]  When I picked him up from my mom's house, we was going home.
[01:04:38.120 --> 01:04:41.120]  So it was probably like 2 or 3 in the morning.
[01:04:41.120 --> 01:04:48.120]  I ended up getting an officer pulling me over, and the officer got behind me.
[01:04:48.120 --> 01:04:56.120]  It was 0.4 miles when I brought my car, my automobile, to a stop.
[01:04:56.120 --> 01:05:01.120]  I'm trying not to say vehicle, but my automobile to a stop in a parking lot
[01:05:01.120 --> 01:05:05.120]  where it was illuminated with light and everything.
[01:05:05.120 --> 01:05:12.120]  The officer ran up on my car with his gun drawn pointed down at my face,
[01:05:12.120 --> 01:05:14.120]  yelling, get the F out the car.
[01:05:14.120 --> 01:05:16.120]  I'm like, whoa.
[01:05:16.120 --> 01:05:18.120]  I had been doing a little research.
[01:05:18.120 --> 01:05:20.120]  Keep your doors locked.
[01:05:20.120 --> 01:05:25.120]  Bring your window down to a minimal because I know how they are in Memphis.
[01:05:25.120 --> 01:05:27.120]  They'll snatch you out the car.
[01:05:27.120 --> 01:05:33.120]  So this officer ran up on my car with his gun pointed at my face, yelling,
[01:05:33.120 --> 01:05:34.120]  get the F out the car.
[01:05:34.120 --> 01:05:37.120]  I had a recording going at the time, and I'm like, whoa.
[01:05:37.120 --> 01:05:42.120]  I put my hands up instantly, and I'm begging the officer to put the gun away.
[01:05:42.120 --> 01:05:45.120]  I got my son in the car, and my son was crying in there.
[01:05:45.120 --> 01:05:47.120]  I'm like, dude, why are you pulling the gun on the traffic stop?
[01:05:47.120 --> 01:05:48.120]  I'm asking for supervisor.
[01:05:48.120 --> 01:05:52.120]  Can't call 911 because I don't want to reach.
[01:05:52.120 --> 01:05:56.120]  So this guy, he calls back up, like 10 cars.
[01:05:56.120 --> 01:06:00.120]  It was quite a few officers pulled up on the scene.
[01:06:00.120 --> 01:06:01.120]  They're like, get out the car.
[01:06:01.120 --> 01:06:02.120]  They're about to bust my windows out.
[01:06:02.120 --> 01:06:03.120]  No, I'm like, I'm not getting out the car.
[01:06:03.120 --> 01:06:04.120]  I feel safe.
[01:06:04.120 --> 01:06:06.120]  You all are trying to cause harm to me.
[01:06:06.120 --> 01:06:08.120]  They're acting crazy, getting me a supervisor.
[01:06:08.120 --> 01:06:09.120]  I got my son in the car.
[01:06:09.120 --> 01:06:10.120]  You're acting crazy.
[01:06:10.120 --> 01:06:14.120]  So finally, I don't know, this one guy, I guess he had a small enough arm.
[01:06:14.120 --> 01:06:18.120]  My window must not have been up too far.
[01:06:18.120 --> 01:06:22.120]  This guy was able to get his arm in, snatched me out the car.
[01:06:22.120 --> 01:06:27.120]  They get the door open, snatched me out the car, start kicking me and beating me.
[01:06:27.120 --> 01:06:30.120]  Now, I don't know why this guy at the time pulled me over.
[01:06:30.120 --> 01:06:33.120]  They gave me a handcuff, put me in the back seat.
[01:06:33.120 --> 01:06:35.120]  So I asked the officer why I'm in handcuffs.
[01:06:35.120 --> 01:06:38.120]  He said, why did you pull me over?
[01:06:38.120 --> 01:06:45.120]  He said, I caught you 10 miles, you was going 50 and a 40.
[01:06:45.120 --> 01:06:51.120]  And I said, what crime did I commit?
[01:06:51.120 --> 01:06:53.120]  I got beat up.
[01:06:53.120 --> 01:06:55.120]  I'm putting in handcuffs.
[01:06:55.120 --> 01:06:56.120]  What crime did I commit?
[01:06:56.120 --> 01:06:58.120]  And he didn't say nothing.
[01:06:58.120 --> 01:07:04.120]  So the supervisor came on scene, and I told the supervisor, because I knew my brother used to be a former police officer.
[01:07:04.120 --> 01:07:09.120]  I told the supervisor, I said, your officer didn't follow the procedures or whatever.
[01:07:09.120 --> 01:07:11.120]  I said, man, I got beat up and everything.
[01:07:11.120 --> 01:07:14.120]  Guns drawn on me on a traffic stop and everything.
[01:07:14.120 --> 01:07:16.120]  I said, I know that's not law.
[01:07:16.120 --> 01:07:22.120]  So the supervisor insisted that I was a sovereign citizen because I started telling them that wasn't law.
[01:07:22.120 --> 01:07:28.120]  Well, that's their pat answer for everything when somebody challenges what they do as being wrong.
[01:07:28.120 --> 01:07:29.120]  Right.
[01:07:29.120 --> 01:07:33.120]  So and then while I'm sitting in the car, I asked when the officer come back to the car, I said, am I going to jail?
[01:07:33.120 --> 01:07:34.120]  He said, yes.
[01:07:34.120 --> 01:07:35.120]  I said, what am I going to jail for?
[01:07:35.120 --> 01:07:37.120]  He said, 10 miles of speeding.
[01:07:37.120 --> 01:07:40.120]  I said, I didn't know you can get arrested for 10 miles of speeding.
[01:07:40.120 --> 01:07:44.120]  So he steps out the car, and they huddle up in the crowd.
[01:07:44.120 --> 01:07:46.120]  He comes back.
[01:07:46.120 --> 01:07:50.120]  He says, you're going to jail for invading in a motor vehicle.
[01:07:50.120 --> 01:07:51.120]  I said, invading in a motor vehicle?
[01:07:51.120 --> 01:07:52.120]  I said, what is that?
[01:07:52.120 --> 01:07:55.120]  He said, you didn't stop the car when I asked you to stop.
[01:07:55.120 --> 01:07:59.120]  I said, well, if I didn't stop the car, who stopped my car?
[01:07:59.120 --> 01:08:00.120]  I pulled over in a safe location.
[01:08:00.120 --> 01:08:02.120]  Who stopped the car?
[01:08:02.120 --> 01:08:06.120]  You didn't pull over when I asked you to pull over on the side of the road.
[01:08:06.120 --> 01:08:10.120]  I said, well, the side of the road is not safe.
[01:08:10.120 --> 01:08:13.120]  I've been driving trucks for seven years.
[01:08:13.120 --> 01:08:16.120]  I know safety is first.
[01:08:16.120 --> 01:08:18.120]  And that's being on the side of the road is not safe.
[01:08:18.120 --> 01:08:31.120]  And the Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court has already made a ruling on that, that you can stop in a place where you believe that you have better odds of being safe rather than on just the side of the road, especially in a lonely place.
[01:08:31.120 --> 01:08:34.120]  And these cops are supposed to know that.
[01:08:34.120 --> 01:08:37.120]  But, of course, they don't care.
[01:08:37.120 --> 01:08:39.120]  But anyhow, go ahead.
[01:08:39.120 --> 01:08:40.120]  Right.
[01:08:40.120 --> 01:08:52.120]  So to make a long story short, they arrested me on invading in a motor vehicle, didn't write me a ticket, take me to the, what you call it, I asked for an ambulance.
[01:08:52.120 --> 01:08:54.120]  The ambulance come out.
[01:08:54.120 --> 01:09:01.120]  The guys, the two ambulance paramedic guys, they're debating whether they want to take me to the emergency room, and I told them I got beat up.
[01:09:01.120 --> 01:09:04.120]  The guy said, nope, you don't seem like you are in an emergency.
[01:09:04.120 --> 01:09:07.120]  You have an emergency situation.
[01:09:07.120 --> 01:09:10.120]  The emergency room is for people with critical situations.
[01:09:10.120 --> 01:09:11.120]  You look fine.
[01:09:11.120 --> 01:09:13.120]  I said, I'm hurt.
[01:09:13.120 --> 01:09:16.120]  The guy, I said, beat me up, beat me with a stick.
[01:09:16.120 --> 01:09:17.120]  So they wouldn't take me.
[01:09:17.120 --> 01:09:19.120]  They took me down to the process of intake.
[01:09:19.120 --> 01:09:21.120]  I asked to be taken before a magistrate.
[01:09:21.120 --> 01:09:23.120]  They didn't take me there.
[01:09:23.120 --> 01:09:27.120]  So they took me down to the intake to process me in.
[01:09:27.120 --> 01:09:29.120]  When they got down there, they asked you, are you hurt, injured?
[01:09:29.120 --> 01:09:30.120]  I said, yes.
[01:09:30.120 --> 01:09:33.120]  They said, do you need to go to the, I said, yes.
[01:09:33.120 --> 01:09:38.120]  The guy on medical, in the process of intake comes out, said, let me see him.
[01:09:38.120 --> 01:09:39.120]  He looks at me.
[01:09:39.120 --> 01:09:40.120]  He said, he's fine.
[01:09:40.120 --> 01:09:41.120]  Leave him here.
[01:09:41.120 --> 01:09:42.120]  They didn't take me.
[01:09:42.120 --> 01:09:44.120]  So I had to go to the medical room once I had bonded out.
[01:09:44.120 --> 01:09:53.120]  I bonded out, I'm going to the medical room to get them to look at me and take information.
[01:09:53.120 --> 01:09:56.120]  But I ended up getting an attorney.
[01:09:56.120 --> 01:09:57.120]  I ended up getting an attorney.
[01:09:57.120 --> 01:10:01.120]  We go to the preliminary hearing and my attorney trips this officer up.
[01:10:01.120 --> 01:10:08.120]  This officer said, he said, I drove 0.5 miles or more.
[01:10:08.120 --> 01:10:12.120]  And he said, it took me three minutes to stop.
[01:10:12.120 --> 01:10:13.120]  I didn't stop.
[01:10:13.120 --> 01:10:16.120]  But he presumed that I was looking for a place to bail out.
[01:10:16.120 --> 01:10:20.120]  That's what he said and everything on the report.
[01:10:20.120 --> 01:10:27.120]  So the attorney said, if they didn't indict within six months in 2012, they're not going to indict the case.
[01:10:27.120 --> 01:10:28.120]  Okay.
[01:10:28.120 --> 01:10:29.120]  I didn't hear nothing.
[01:10:29.120 --> 01:10:33.120]  Twenty, twenty, not fifteen, twenty fifteen.
[01:10:33.120 --> 01:10:42.120]  Twenty fifteen, they tried to come in saying that they indicted me on this case now, prosecuted me on it.
[01:10:42.120 --> 01:10:57.120]  But the reason why I think they did it, because in 2014, I got falsely arrested again in 2014 for going to Wal-Mart with face paint on with my kids on Trick or Treat Halloween.
[01:10:57.120 --> 01:11:01.120]  We wanted to Wal-Mart to buy some consultants.
[01:11:01.120 --> 01:11:10.120]  And the off-duty police officer decided that he was going to enforce, he was working for private security at the time for Wal-Mart.
[01:11:10.120 --> 01:11:13.120]  Actually, the off-duty police officer mentioned.
[01:11:13.120 --> 01:11:16.120]  So he said, you can't come in here with face paint.
[01:11:16.120 --> 01:11:17.120]  You need to leave.
[01:11:17.120 --> 01:11:21.120]  I said, well, we're just trying to get some drink and I'm trying to feed the kids and we're going back home.
[01:11:21.120 --> 01:11:23.120]  Y'all got to leave up out of here.
[01:11:23.120 --> 01:11:24.120]  This is our policy.
[01:11:24.120 --> 01:11:26.120]  I said, well, we didn't see no signs that said we can come in.
[01:11:26.120 --> 01:11:29.120]  I said, well, let me get a supervisor and speak to a manager.
[01:11:29.120 --> 01:11:31.120]  He said, no, you're about to get arrested if you don't get up out of here.
[01:11:31.120 --> 01:11:33.120]  So we started walking back towards the door.
[01:11:33.120 --> 01:11:40.120]  Hang on, Jermaine, you're breaking up.
[01:11:40.120 --> 01:11:44.120]  You're still breaking up.
[01:11:44.120 --> 01:11:47.120]  I don't know what's wrong, man.
[01:11:47.120 --> 01:11:48.120]  Right there, right there.
[01:11:48.120 --> 01:11:50.120]  Go back to you started walking toward the door.
[01:11:50.120 --> 01:11:54.120]  Yeah, we started walking towards the door and we were talking.
[01:11:54.120 --> 01:11:57.120]  And then I asked him, I said, can you get me a supervisor?
[01:11:57.120 --> 01:11:59.120]  He said, no, you're going to get out of here.
[01:11:59.120 --> 01:12:00.120]  He grabbed me.
[01:12:00.120 --> 01:12:04.120]  So I stepped to the side and I asked this guy, I said, can you please not touch me?
[01:12:04.120 --> 01:12:06.120]  He said, he grabbed me again.
[01:12:06.120 --> 01:12:08.120]  So now you're under arrest, put your hands behind your back.
[01:12:08.120 --> 01:12:11.120]  Now I know the statute says once they say you're under arrest,
[01:12:11.120 --> 01:12:14.120]  you have the right to ask them what you've been arrested for.
[01:12:14.120 --> 01:12:17.120]  And then they have to identify what they're arresting you for.
[01:12:17.120 --> 01:12:21.120]  Once they identify, if you don't submit, then they can use necessary force.
[01:12:21.120 --> 01:12:24.120]  So I asked him, I said, what am I being arrested for?
[01:12:24.120 --> 01:12:27.120]  He said, if you don't put your hands behind your back, I'm going to mace you.
[01:12:27.120 --> 01:12:29.120]  I said, sir, what am I being arrested for?
[01:12:29.120 --> 01:12:30.120]  All of a sudden he maced me.
[01:12:30.120 --> 01:12:32.120]  So I put my hands behind my back.
[01:12:32.120 --> 01:12:34.120]  The kids was in the uproar.
[01:12:34.120 --> 01:12:37.120]  People in the Walmart were like, whoa, did he just do that?
[01:12:37.120 --> 01:12:41.120]  So he takes me down into a room.
[01:12:41.120 --> 01:12:45.120]  The supervisor, no, his supervisor comes from MPD
[01:12:45.120 --> 01:12:47.120]  and I asked him to identify himself, he would.
[01:12:47.120 --> 01:12:52.120]  So I was like, well, this guy just maced me and I didn't do nothing
[01:12:52.120 --> 01:12:54.120]  and they won't tell me what I've been arrested for.
[01:12:54.120 --> 01:12:58.120]  So I said, if you're going to jail, I want to go before the magistrate.
[01:12:58.120 --> 01:13:02.120]  And the supervisor said, no, you're not going nowhere.
[01:13:02.120 --> 01:13:03.120]  You're going straight to jail.
[01:13:03.120 --> 01:13:05.120]  I said, you can't take me straight to jail.
[01:13:05.120 --> 01:13:06.120]  I said, I want to see a magistrate.
[01:13:06.120 --> 01:13:09.120]  You can't make that determination to know you're going.
[01:13:09.120 --> 01:13:11.120]  So they ended up taking me to jail on that.
[01:13:11.120 --> 01:13:14.120]  So when I went there, I bonded out on that case.
[01:13:14.120 --> 01:13:19.120]  And when I went to court that Monday, that Monday, the judge came,
[01:13:19.120 --> 01:13:24.120]  the judge downstairs, he called my name.
[01:13:24.120 --> 01:13:28.120]  But I approached the bench and special appearance and I asked him
[01:13:28.120 --> 01:13:31.120]  if the accuser could come forward and identify the accused party.
[01:13:31.120 --> 01:13:34.120]  He said, no, you give your name to this court.
[01:13:34.120 --> 01:13:37.120]  And I said, well, if you will allow the accuser to come forward
[01:13:37.120 --> 01:13:40.120]  and identify the accused party, I would be willing to give my name.
[01:13:40.120 --> 01:13:45.120]  So they got mad and then he said, and I told him I was a beneficiary
[01:13:45.120 --> 01:13:50.120]  or some stuff that I got out of line and everything.
[01:13:50.120 --> 01:13:52.120]  So then he said, well, you can't.
[01:13:52.120 --> 01:13:54.120]  Well, let me ask you one question while we're on that subject.
[01:13:54.120 --> 01:14:00.120]  Just exactly how did that pan out for you?
[01:14:00.120 --> 01:14:04.120]  I left the court and everything.
[01:14:04.120 --> 01:14:10.120]  And then I ended up getting a warrant put out for my arrest.
[01:14:10.120 --> 01:14:11.120]  Yeah.
[01:14:11.120 --> 01:14:16.120]  But not a pen, not on the case that I just got arrested on,
[01:14:16.120 --> 01:14:20.120]  for the one upstairs that I supposedly had got indicted.
[01:14:20.120 --> 01:14:24.120]  I supposedly had got indicted and I missed the court date
[01:14:24.120 --> 01:14:26.120]  and now a warrant is out for my arrest.
[01:14:26.120 --> 01:14:28.120]  I was like, well, I never knew of a court date.
[01:14:28.120 --> 01:14:31.120]  When did they ever say that I had got?
[01:14:31.120 --> 01:14:33.120]  Well, where's the actual indictment?
[01:14:33.120 --> 01:14:35.120]  When did they allegedly get this indictment?
[01:14:35.120 --> 01:14:38.120]  The thing is, is the indictment has a statute of limitations on it
[01:14:38.120 --> 01:14:41.120]  like anything else, depending upon what level of offense
[01:14:41.120 --> 01:14:44.120]  they were going to indict you for.
[01:14:44.120 --> 01:14:49.120]  Felonies can be any number of years while misdemeanors are anywhere from one to two.
[01:14:49.120 --> 01:14:51.120]  It just depends.
[01:14:51.120 --> 01:14:53.120]  Each state's a little different in some places.
[01:14:53.120 --> 01:14:56.120]  Most of the time it's up to two years if it's a misdemeanor
[01:14:56.120 --> 01:15:00.120]  and three to five or five to ten if it's certain types of felonies
[01:15:00.120 --> 01:15:03.120]  or never if it's something like murder.
[01:15:03.120 --> 01:15:10.120]  When I looked it up, upon an invading arrest,
[01:15:10.120 --> 01:15:15.120]  it's a Class E felony, they say in a motor vehicle, Class E felony.
[01:15:15.120 --> 01:15:19.120]  And how long is the statute of limitations to prosecute that,
[01:15:19.120 --> 01:15:22.120]  to file a complaint and prosecute or get the indictment?
[01:15:22.120 --> 01:15:23.120]  Three years.
[01:15:23.120 --> 01:15:24.120]  Okay.
[01:15:24.120 --> 01:15:29.120]  And were they within that time?
[01:15:29.120 --> 01:15:31.120]  I would think so.
[01:15:31.120 --> 01:15:32.120]  Okay.
[01:15:32.120 --> 01:15:35.120]  So here's what they actually did and didn't tell you that they did
[01:15:35.120 --> 01:15:38.120]  if they ever got the indictment.
[01:15:38.120 --> 01:15:42.120]  They used the one appearance to resurrect the old one
[01:15:42.120 --> 01:15:44.120]  that they hadn't done anything with
[01:15:44.120 --> 01:15:47.120]  and said, well, here's something we can get this guy on
[01:15:47.120 --> 01:15:49.120]  that's a much higher level offense.
[01:15:49.120 --> 01:15:52.120]  We can get a lot more out of him and do a lot more to him
[01:15:52.120 --> 01:15:56.120]  if we use this charge instead of that charge.
[01:15:56.120 --> 01:15:59.120]  So they then decided to get their indictment
[01:15:59.120 --> 01:16:02.120]  and go after the felony rather than the misdemeanor,
[01:16:02.120 --> 01:16:04.120]  even though there was no actual crime committed
[01:16:04.120 --> 01:16:07.120]  to get you arrested in the first place.
[01:16:07.120 --> 01:16:11.120]  But did you get an attorney for the Walmart arrest?
[01:16:11.120 --> 01:16:14.120]  No, I didn't get an attorney.
[01:16:14.120 --> 01:16:17.120]  When they brought me back in court, they just dismissed it.
[01:16:17.120 --> 01:16:19.120]  Okay, but that's still not my question.
[01:16:19.120 --> 01:16:22.120]  Dismissed or not, you had an aggravated assault
[01:16:22.120 --> 01:16:25.120]  and an aggravated kidnapping and a false imprisonment.
[01:16:25.120 --> 01:16:30.120]  You had a whole bunch of stuff to get people in a lot of trouble for.
[01:16:30.120 --> 01:16:32.120]  And you didn't pursue it.
[01:16:32.120 --> 01:16:36.120]  That's why I'm trying to find out why you didn't.
[01:16:36.120 --> 01:16:39.120]  Because the store video would have shown,
[01:16:39.120 --> 01:16:42.120]  there was no such policy, for one thing,
[01:16:42.120 --> 01:16:45.120]  and the officer was acting way outside of lawful authority
[01:16:45.120 --> 01:16:47.120]  by trying to get you out of there,
[01:16:47.120 --> 01:16:51.120]  and he assaulted you for no reason whatsoever.
[01:16:51.120 --> 01:16:53.120]  It just escalates from there.
[01:16:53.120 --> 01:16:56.120]  Hang on just a second, Jermaine, and we'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:16:56.120 --> 01:17:10.120]  Okay.
[01:17:26.120 --> 01:17:28.120]  Make your contribution.
[01:17:28.120 --> 01:17:32.120]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:17:32.120 --> 01:17:35.120]  First prize being a Spikes Skull lower receiver.
[01:17:35.120 --> 01:17:37.120]  Second prize being a Taurus curb.
[01:17:37.120 --> 01:17:39.120]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor.
[01:17:39.120 --> 01:17:42.120]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough,
[01:17:42.120 --> 01:17:45.120]  you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud.
[01:17:45.120 --> 01:17:48.120]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted,
[01:17:48.120 --> 01:17:50.120]  as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[01:17:50.120 --> 01:17:52.120]  The Logos Radio Network fundraiser.
[01:17:52.120 --> 01:17:55.120]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information
[01:17:55.120 --> 01:17:58.120]  and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:18:00.120 --> 01:18:04.120]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[01:18:04.120 --> 01:18:06.120]  except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.120 --> 01:18:09.120]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves,
[01:18:09.120 --> 01:18:11.120]  and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.120 --> 01:18:17.120]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.120 --> 01:18:22.120]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:22.120 --> 01:18:25.120]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.120 --> 01:18:31.120]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.120 --> 01:18:34.120]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much,
[01:18:34.120 --> 01:18:39.120]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:39.120 --> 01:18:43.120]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[01:18:43.120 --> 01:18:47.120]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.120 --> 01:18:51.120]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:51.120 --> 01:18:56.120]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[01:18:56.120 --> 01:18:58.120]  and increase your income.
[01:18:58.120 --> 01:19:00.120]  Order now.
[01:19:00.120 --> 01:19:29.120]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:29.120 --> 01:19:33.120]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking to Jermaine in Tennessee.
[01:19:33.120 --> 01:19:38.120]  Alright Jermaine, anyway, you didn't go after these guys,
[01:19:38.120 --> 01:19:41.120]  even though they falsely arrested you and everything else,
[01:19:41.120 --> 01:19:46.120]  and now they say they've got an indictment for something that was within the statute of limitations.
[01:19:46.120 --> 01:19:49.120]  Have you seen this indictment?
[01:19:49.120 --> 01:19:56.120]  Yes, I got some papers that the, they gave me a public court of attorney,
[01:19:56.120 --> 01:20:02.120]  and I got some papers he sent me, and he, a discovery that he sent me also,
[01:20:02.120 --> 01:20:09.120]  and because I asked him where is the articulable probable cause to show cause for the arrest,
[01:20:09.120 --> 01:20:13.120]  arresting me that I committed this crime of invading or anything.
[01:20:13.120 --> 01:20:16.120]  Not invading, evading.
[01:20:16.120 --> 01:20:17.120]  Evading.
[01:20:17.120 --> 01:20:21.120]  Yeah, evading arrest, that's what they're trying to charge you with.
[01:20:21.120 --> 01:20:25.120]  Right, so I asked him that, and he was, and the guy, and the guy was like,
[01:20:25.120 --> 01:20:28.120]  hey God, I'm like, this is just information.
[01:20:28.120 --> 01:20:32.120]  What was the evidence that would have gave them probable cause
[01:20:32.120 --> 01:20:38.120]  to support their legal standing they're trying to attempt?
[01:20:38.120 --> 01:20:41.120]  And he don't, they don't have anything.
[01:20:41.120 --> 01:20:46.120]  But the prosecutor is making threats because he's saying he want me to take the deal,
[01:20:46.120 --> 01:20:48.120]  and I'm like, I'm not going to take no deal, and he's like,
[01:20:48.120 --> 01:20:52.120]  well I'm going to, if I have to go to trial and he ignore me with this,
[01:20:52.120 --> 01:20:55.120]  I'm going to ask for jail time.
[01:20:55.120 --> 01:20:59.120]  Well yeah, that's how they get their negotiated pleas.
[01:20:59.120 --> 01:21:02.120]  That's once again the way the attorneys operate.
[01:21:02.120 --> 01:21:04.120]  The system is no longer about justice,
[01:21:04.120 --> 01:21:07.120]  it's about getting you into the system through plea bargains.
[01:21:07.120 --> 01:21:12.120]  And they do that by using threats that they're going to ask for all this stuff
[01:21:12.120 --> 01:21:16.120]  even though in reality they have no evidence to base it on.
[01:21:16.120 --> 01:21:22.120]  Because most of the time they will go through creating presumptive guilt,
[01:21:22.120 --> 01:21:25.120]  just like they do here in Texas with the transportation code.
[01:21:25.120 --> 01:21:30.120]  Everyone is assumed to be in transportation and charged with a transportation offense
[01:21:30.120 --> 01:21:34.120]  even though there is zero evidence, fact or otherwise,
[01:21:34.120 --> 01:21:42.120]  that would show the individual was actually doing anything under that particular subject matter.
[01:21:42.120 --> 01:21:47.120]  But there's no question that that's a controlling subject matter, at least here.
[01:21:47.120 --> 01:21:50.120]  Now as far as they're, most likely it's going to be the same thing.
[01:21:50.120 --> 01:21:53.120]  You just have to figure out what the Tennessee statutes say on that,
[01:21:53.120 --> 01:21:56.120]  which is something Olivier seems to have managed to do so far
[01:21:56.120 --> 01:22:00.120]  because he's managing to win a lot more and he's losing.
[01:22:00.120 --> 01:22:06.120]  But the fact remains that they're going to threaten you that way.
[01:22:06.120 --> 01:22:13.120]  It's their job, the way they see it, it's their job.
[01:22:13.120 --> 01:22:19.120]  Right, so now I found this interrogatory asking some questions.
[01:22:19.120 --> 01:22:20.120]  Well, wait a minute.
[01:22:20.120 --> 01:22:23.120]  This interrogatory, the problem is this.
[01:22:23.120 --> 01:22:25.120]  You have an attorney.
[01:22:25.120 --> 01:22:28.120]  You can't file anything.
[01:22:28.120 --> 01:22:37.120]  They will not respond to a single thing you do as long as you have counsel.
[01:22:37.120 --> 01:22:40.120]  Okay, and I think he says, are you going to give me this bar?
[01:22:40.120 --> 01:22:42.120]  He can't argue none of this stuff that I filed.
[01:22:42.120 --> 01:22:44.120]  That's what he was saying.
[01:22:44.120 --> 01:22:46.120]  Right, that's the other way they control the outcome of the case.
[01:22:46.120 --> 01:22:51.120]  Your attorney is under their thumb to do things their way, right, wrong or indifferent,
[01:22:51.120 --> 01:22:53.120]  whether it endangers your rights or not.
[01:22:53.120 --> 01:23:00.120]  His job is to ensure one thing and one thing only, that you do not have appealable error.
[01:23:00.120 --> 01:23:02.120]  His job is not to protect your rights.
[01:23:02.120 --> 01:23:04.120]  His job is not to get you off.
[01:23:04.120 --> 01:23:09.120]  His job is solely to make sure that you have nothing you can appeal.
[01:23:09.120 --> 01:23:11.120]  That's it.
[01:23:11.120 --> 01:23:15.120]  In other words, he is working against you from the very beginning.
[01:23:15.120 --> 01:23:22.120]  One of the ways he ensures that you don't have appealable error is he weighs a bunch of your rights right up front.
[01:23:22.120 --> 01:23:24.120]  He weighs your right to challenge the indictment.
[01:23:24.120 --> 01:23:28.120]  He weighs your right to challenge the grand jury that was in panel.
[01:23:28.120 --> 01:23:34.120]  He weighs your right to challenge the complaint for form and substance, the charging instrument for form and substance.
[01:23:34.120 --> 01:23:37.120]  He weighs your right to virtually everything.
[01:23:37.120 --> 01:23:40.120]  That way you don't have any appealable error.
[01:23:40.120 --> 01:23:42.120]  So I need to get rid of him.
[01:23:42.120 --> 01:23:43.120]  How do I?
[01:23:43.120 --> 01:23:45.120]  Well, wait a minute.
[01:23:45.120 --> 01:23:53.120]  It's not so much a matter of getting rid of him as an understanding what he is trying to do and thus how to control what he does.
[01:23:53.120 --> 01:24:00.120]  The problem is that if you don't know any of this process yourself and the law to use to make it work the way it's supposed to,
[01:24:00.120 --> 01:24:04.120]  you're no better off without one than you are with one.
[01:24:04.120 --> 01:24:08.120]  In fact, you're at a bigger disadvantage.
[01:24:08.120 --> 01:24:14.120]  So the objective here is to learn what your attorney is supposed to do, how he is supposed to do it.
[01:24:14.120 --> 01:24:25.120]  What the rules of evidence and procedure are that he violates, where he got the permission to waive rights that you didn't consent to have waived, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:24:25.120 --> 01:24:30.120]  Because here's the one thing you will notice about every attorney that they appoint to you.
[01:24:30.120 --> 01:24:40.120]  The moment you refuse to have him waive any of your rights and you do not allow him to cut any deals that actually requires him to put on a defense,
[01:24:40.120 --> 01:24:44.120]  the first thing he's going to do is motion to withdraw from the case.
[01:24:44.120 --> 01:24:49.120]  And the court will grant it nine times out of ten.
[01:24:49.120 --> 01:24:58.120]  Because if the attorney is not going to be allowed to sell you down the river, then that means he has to put up a fight,
[01:24:58.120 --> 01:25:06.120]  which costs them profits and him an opportunity.
[01:25:06.120 --> 01:25:10.120]  This system is not about you getting justice anymore.
[01:25:10.120 --> 01:25:17.120]  It hasn't been for a very long time.
[01:25:17.120 --> 01:25:21.120]  This is the games they play and the way they set it up to be played.
[01:25:21.120 --> 01:25:28.120]  It is everybody against the accused, even his own defense counsel.
[01:25:28.120 --> 01:25:30.120]  Yeah, I definitely see that.
[01:25:30.120 --> 01:25:37.120]  The only time that's going to be different is when you have enough money to make sure that he is getting a big enough chunk of it
[01:25:37.120 --> 01:25:40.120]  that he's willing to take the risk and fight the battle.
[01:25:40.120 --> 01:25:44.120]  That's why the only people that get justice are those with money,
[01:25:44.120 --> 01:25:54.120]  because they're the only ones that can hire an attorney that will actually buck the system for the profit.
[01:25:54.120 --> 01:25:57.120]  So how do I put him on notice, the attorney on notice that...
[01:25:57.120 --> 01:26:02.120]  Start bar grieving him every single time he weighs one of your rights or refuses.
[01:26:02.120 --> 01:26:05.120]  Now, you have to understand something.
[01:26:05.120 --> 01:26:13.120]  If you're going to be using the same kind of crap that you were talking about before in what you said in the courtroom,
[01:26:13.120 --> 01:26:16.120]  you don't know what you're doing, okay?
[01:26:16.120 --> 01:26:17.120]  You don't know.
[01:26:17.120 --> 01:26:18.120]  That is patronut crap.
[01:26:18.120 --> 01:26:21.120]  It does not work.
[01:26:21.120 --> 01:26:28.120]  It will get you in over your head so far, so fast you'll be drowned before you can look up and gurgle.
[01:26:28.120 --> 01:26:32.120]  Yeah, I'm not trying to go to that method.
[01:26:32.120 --> 01:26:34.120]  I'm not trying to go to that method because it's a series.
[01:26:34.120 --> 01:26:35.120]  Right.
[01:26:35.120 --> 01:26:41.120]  So the thing is, is the things you're asking this attorney to do may actually not be the right thing to do
[01:26:41.120 --> 01:26:47.120]  if you don't know what is supposed to be happening and how it's supposed to be happening under the law
[01:26:47.120 --> 01:26:53.120]  and under your protected rights within the state constitution, okay?
[01:26:53.120 --> 01:26:56.120]  Until you have studied this, you know what the Bill of Rights is,
[01:26:56.120 --> 01:27:01.120]  you know that the laws have to comply with the Bill of Rights and all the other constitutional provisions,
[01:27:01.120 --> 01:27:10.120]  and you understand where those are being violated, how do you make an argument that it's being violated?
[01:27:10.120 --> 01:27:14.120]  How do you raise the issue that this law that you're using against me is unconstitutional
[01:27:14.120 --> 01:27:20.120]  because it requires me to convert a right into a privilege or waive a right to exercise a privilege
[01:27:20.120 --> 01:27:28.120]  or waive a right to comply with your demands and thus surprise me of that right and harms me by doing so?
[01:27:28.120 --> 01:27:33.120]  Until you know how to make those arguments, how are you going to make sure your attorney's doing the right thing
[01:27:33.120 --> 01:27:37.120]  because you don't know what they are?
[01:27:37.120 --> 01:27:39.120]  Are you following me here?
[01:27:39.120 --> 01:27:40.120]  Yeah.
[01:27:40.120 --> 01:27:47.120]  So what you're asking him to do for the interrogatories, he may not really not be able to do.
[01:27:47.120 --> 01:27:48.120]  It just depends.
[01:27:48.120 --> 01:27:52.120]  Not having seen them or knowing exactly what the specifics of the charge against you are
[01:27:52.120 --> 01:27:57.120]  and the rules of procedure in the court system you're in, I can't say for sure one way or the other.
[01:27:57.120 --> 01:28:00.120]  I haven't studied the Tennessee law.
[01:28:00.120 --> 01:28:01.120]  Okay?
[01:28:01.120 --> 01:28:08.120]  Well, the two charges they got against me was they got a felony failure to appear
[01:28:08.120 --> 01:28:12.120]  because they said that I didn't appear, but there was no service.
[01:28:12.120 --> 01:28:16.120]  There was no service, but they still stuck me with that failure to appear charge.
[01:28:16.120 --> 01:28:20.120]  Well, again, the right to notice is an inherent fundamental right.
[01:28:20.120 --> 01:28:27.120]  So when they say you failed to appear, they must show proof that they properly noticed you to appear.
[01:28:27.120 --> 01:28:28.120]  Right.
[01:28:28.120 --> 01:28:36.120]  And what they used was, well, we sent it to the address, but it got returned back to them
[01:28:36.120 --> 01:28:39.120]  because I didn't no longer live at that address.
[01:28:39.120 --> 01:28:46.120]  But they said I should have known or checked and see.
[01:28:46.120 --> 01:28:48.120]  No, that ain't going to fly.
[01:28:48.120 --> 01:28:50.120]  They are not allowed to presume what you should have known.
[01:28:50.120 --> 01:28:53.120]  And the judge accepted it.
[01:28:53.120 --> 01:29:02.120]  The public defender was like, he tried to kind of help take up for me in that area.
[01:29:02.120 --> 01:29:07.120]  And it was like they waited four years to indict this.
[01:29:07.120 --> 01:29:14.120]  And it was like Mr. Jefferson moved and everything, and the information got sent back.
[01:29:14.120 --> 01:29:17.120]  But they let the charge stick.
[01:29:17.120 --> 01:29:20.120]  They were trying to get that dismissed, but they let the charge stick.
[01:29:20.120 --> 01:29:26.120]  Well, improper notice is still an appealable error, and the attorney can't waive that.
[01:29:26.120 --> 01:29:28.120]  Okay.
[01:29:28.120 --> 01:29:33.120]  Well, actually he can, but don't let him.
[01:29:33.120 --> 01:29:40.120]  Do not ever, and that's one of the things where entering please in cases like this, that's exactly what it does.
[01:29:40.120 --> 01:29:46.120]  It removes the ability to argue improper notice.
[01:29:46.120 --> 01:29:48.120]  All right, Jermaine, you got anything else on this?
[01:29:48.120 --> 01:29:53.120]  Because I got a bunch of other callers, and I've only got a limited amount of time here, man.
[01:29:53.120 --> 01:29:57.120]  I was trying to figure out what would be my next move.
[01:29:57.120 --> 01:30:00.120]  All right, well hang on, and I'll wrap this up.
[01:30:00.120 --> 01:30:02.120]  Would you like to be more attractive?
[01:30:02.120 --> 01:30:05.120]  A quick clothing change could do the trick.
[01:30:05.120 --> 01:30:08.120]  Researchers say it could be as simple as choosing the right color.
[01:30:08.120 --> 01:30:12.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment to tell you more.
[01:30:12.120 --> 01:30:16.120]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches,
[01:30:16.120 --> 01:30:19.120]  and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:19.120 --> 01:30:20.120]  That's creepy.
[01:30:20.120 --> 01:30:22.120]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:22.120 --> 01:30:25.120]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:25.120 --> 01:30:29.120]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches,
[01:30:29.120 --> 01:30:32.120]  or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:32.120 --> 01:30:36.120]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:36.120 --> 01:30:39.120]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:39.120 --> 01:30:42.120]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.120 --> 01:30:44.120]  Lady in red.
[01:30:44.120 --> 01:30:47.120]  You might remember that 1980s hit song.
[01:30:47.120 --> 01:30:51.120]  Chris Deberg crooned about how his lady never looked so lovely, but he was puzzled.
[01:30:51.120 --> 01:30:54.120]  What change that made her so irresistible?
[01:30:54.120 --> 01:30:56.120]  It was her new red dress.
[01:30:56.120 --> 01:30:59.120]  Researchers prove that red makes women more desirable to men.
[01:30:59.120 --> 01:31:04.120]  In one study, men viewed a picture of a moderately attractive lady dressed in red.
[01:31:04.120 --> 01:31:07.120]  A second group of men viewed that same lady dressed in blue.
[01:31:07.120 --> 01:31:08.120]  The results?
[01:31:08.120 --> 01:31:10.120]  Red revved things up.
[01:31:10.120 --> 01:31:13.120]  Men wanted to flirt with and sit much closer to the lady in red.
[01:31:13.120 --> 01:31:19.120]  So ladies, if you want to attract a man or light the fire in your special guy, wear red.
[01:31:19.120 --> 01:31:20.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:20.120 --> 01:31:30.120]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.120 --> 01:31:36.120]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.120 --> 01:31:38.120]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.120 --> 01:31:43.120]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.120 --> 01:31:46.120]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.120 --> 01:31:49.120]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.120 --> 01:31:50.120]  I'm a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.120 --> 01:31:51.120]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.120 --> 01:31:52.120]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.120 --> 01:31:53.120]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.120 --> 01:31:55.120]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.120 --> 01:31:58.120]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.120 --> 01:32:01.120]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.120 --> 01:32:03.120]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.120 --> 01:32:06.120]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.120 --> 01:32:09.120]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their Kim Trails.
[01:32:09.120 --> 01:32:11.120]  But good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.120 --> 01:32:14.120]  Okay, I might be kidding about the Kim Trails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.120 --> 01:32:16.120]  That's why you have insurance.
[01:32:16.120 --> 01:32:21.120]  Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.120 --> 01:32:27.120]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.120 --> 01:32:32.120]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.120 --> 01:32:38.120]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.120 --> 01:32:41.120]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off.
[01:32:41.120 --> 01:32:45.120]  And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.120 --> 01:32:50.120]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.120 --> 01:32:56.120]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.120 --> 01:32:58.120]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.120 --> 01:33:01.120]  May not actually be kidding about Kim Trails.
[01:33:03.120 --> 01:33:10.120]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:10.120 --> 01:33:25.120]  All right, folks.
[01:33:25.120 --> 01:33:26.120]  We are back.
[01:33:26.120 --> 01:33:27.120]  Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:27.120 --> 01:33:29.120]  We're going to wrap this up with Jermaine.
[01:33:29.120 --> 01:33:30.120]  All right, Jermaine.
[01:33:30.120 --> 01:33:33.120]  Now, what particular point are you at?
[01:33:33.120 --> 01:33:35.120]  What is supposed to be coming up next?
[01:33:35.120 --> 01:33:43.120]  Okay, what they got done, they just set my case off to October the 6th.
[01:33:43.120 --> 01:33:50.120]  And basically, the public defender said, the prosecutor said, no deals for me, period,
[01:33:50.120 --> 01:33:54.120]  because they had in my complaint that I was supposed to be a sovereign citizen.
[01:33:54.120 --> 01:33:56.120]  And it was like, no deal.
[01:33:56.120 --> 01:34:03.120]  Even when they know my situation and the guy's like, no deals, it's like they're not trying to cut a deal with me.
[01:34:03.120 --> 01:34:09.120]  Okay, so in other words, they're not applying the power of their office equally and impartially.
[01:34:09.120 --> 01:34:10.120]  Right.
[01:34:10.120 --> 01:34:13.120]  That's one potential thing you can raise as an error.
[01:34:13.120 --> 01:34:19.120]  And because what the prosecution has done is raise as a prejudicial issue,
[01:34:19.120 --> 01:34:23.120]  this sovereign citizen thing for which they have absolutely no facts or evidence.
[01:34:23.120 --> 01:34:26.120]  And that's what your attorney should be asking.
[01:34:26.120 --> 01:34:33.120]  What harm or prejudice attaches to such an allegation that the accused is a sovereign citizen?
[01:34:33.120 --> 01:34:43.120]  What is the prosecution implying that would be detrimental to my client by making this allegation without any evidence whatsoever?
[01:34:43.120 --> 01:34:51.120]  Simply because an individual questions the actions of a government official does not make them a sovereign citizen.
[01:34:51.120 --> 01:34:53.120]  So that depends on what he does.
[01:34:53.120 --> 01:35:01.120]  Now, in relation to what your attorney's done, if your attorney objected to the lack of notice on the original thing and the judge overruled it anyway,
[01:35:01.120 --> 01:35:04.120]  then he's preserved that for appeal.
[01:35:04.120 --> 01:35:11.120]  If he did not object to it, they could wind up using that against you later and it not be used as an appealable error.
[01:35:11.120 --> 01:35:13.120]  Now, understand this.
[01:35:13.120 --> 01:35:20.120]  Most likely your trial attorney will try to get relieved of having to go forward if there's an appeal in your case.
[01:35:20.120 --> 01:35:25.120]  So you may wind up with a different attorney for the purpose of appeal if you can even get one.
[01:35:25.120 --> 01:35:27.120]  So keep that in mind.
[01:35:27.120 --> 01:35:30.120]  As of right now, if they put it off to such a thing,
[01:35:30.120 --> 01:35:37.120]  you need to be talking to your attorney about the prejudice associated with this so-called sovereign citizen label they're trying to stick you with.
[01:35:37.120 --> 01:35:39.120]  Where did they get it from?
[01:35:39.120 --> 01:35:41.120]  What facts and evidence are they basing it on?
[01:35:41.120 --> 01:35:51.120]  And why is the prosecution using that to deny me the same rights to plea bargains and everything else that the other people have?
[01:35:51.120 --> 01:35:59.120]  In other words, they've used it to prejudice you under the same equal application and protection of the laws as everyone else.
[01:35:59.120 --> 01:36:04.120]  That's a rights-denying activity as well.
[01:36:04.120 --> 01:36:11.120]  Okay, so he came back to me later when he called me up because I thought that interrogatory and he was like,
[01:36:11.120 --> 01:36:13.120]  what are you doing?
[01:36:13.120 --> 01:36:15.120]  He said, you found that paper.
[01:36:15.120 --> 01:36:20.120]  He said, that right there, they can usually try to say you're a sovereign citizen.
[01:36:20.120 --> 01:36:22.120]  I said, there's nowhere in that paper to say I'm a sovereign citizen.
[01:36:22.120 --> 01:36:23.120]  I said, how can a man?
[01:36:23.120 --> 01:36:25.120]  He said, what you trying to argue?
[01:36:25.120 --> 01:36:27.120]  I said, I'm not arguing anything.
[01:36:27.120 --> 01:36:29.120]  I asked questions in that paper.
[01:36:29.120 --> 01:36:31.120]  I asked just questions.
[01:36:31.120 --> 01:36:36.120]  I'm asking, where the authority, the jurisdiction, everything, this is what I'm challenging you.
[01:36:36.120 --> 01:36:47.120]  How, where, when the authority, you get the jurisdiction over me and what law did I break and all this?
[01:36:47.120 --> 01:36:49.120]  I'm asking all these type of questions.
[01:36:49.120 --> 01:36:54.120]  I said, so how is that saying that I'm a sovereign citizen because I'm asking questions?
[01:36:54.120 --> 01:36:56.120]  I said, there's nothing that I...
[01:36:56.120 --> 01:37:01.120]  Without having seen the content of this interrogatory, your attorney's right.
[01:37:01.120 --> 01:37:04.120]  Stop doing that.
[01:37:04.120 --> 01:37:09.120]  The laws they're charging you with is exactly what they've already told you.
[01:37:09.120 --> 01:37:13.120]  The problem you've got is whether or not they're properly using and applying that law.
[01:37:13.120 --> 01:37:19.120]  That's your argument, but you're not going to get an answer to that in an interrogatory.
[01:37:19.120 --> 01:37:23.120]  That's not the time and place for that.
[01:37:23.120 --> 01:37:27.120]  Okay.
[01:37:27.120 --> 01:37:31.120]  The problem is, is you've got somebody that may or may not be fighting for you.
[01:37:31.120 --> 01:37:32.120]  I don't know.
[01:37:32.120 --> 01:37:34.120]  I'm not there to see, but...
[01:37:34.120 --> 01:37:37.120]  He's made comments that it's corrupt.
[01:37:37.120 --> 01:37:40.120]  He's told us it is corrupt.
[01:37:40.120 --> 01:37:45.120]  It's been like this for 100 years now, and he admitted it.
[01:37:45.120 --> 01:37:47.120]  Well, that part's not surprising.
[01:37:47.120 --> 01:37:48.120]  That part doesn't concern me.
[01:37:48.120 --> 01:37:50.120]  We know it's corrupt.
[01:37:50.120 --> 01:37:54.120]  The problem is, is what is he willing to do to protect you from it?
[01:37:54.120 --> 01:37:56.120]  That's the only issue here.
[01:37:56.120 --> 01:38:00.120]  It is the only one.
[01:38:00.120 --> 01:38:05.120]  You get him to admit that he's willing to sacrifice you for his own benefit,
[01:38:05.120 --> 01:38:13.120]  now you've got an ineffective assistance of counsel argument for appeal as well.
[01:38:13.120 --> 01:38:14.120]  Which...
[01:38:14.120 --> 01:38:17.120]  Okay, I got you.
[01:38:17.120 --> 01:38:20.120]  Yeah, I'm willing to throw you under the bus if it means me keeping my bar card
[01:38:20.120 --> 01:38:21.120]  and making money.
[01:38:21.120 --> 01:38:22.120]  Absolutely.
[01:38:22.120 --> 01:38:23.120]  Great.
[01:38:23.120 --> 01:38:25.120]  Ineffective assistance of counsel.
[01:38:25.120 --> 01:38:27.120]  He did kind of mention that though.
[01:38:27.120 --> 01:38:30.120]  Yeah, but do you have any proof of it?
[01:38:30.120 --> 01:38:31.120]  No, I don't have any proof.
[01:38:31.120 --> 01:38:35.120]  Bingo.
[01:38:35.120 --> 01:38:39.120]  This is why I tell you, record your meetings with your attorney.
[01:38:39.120 --> 01:38:41.120]  Always.
[01:38:41.120 --> 01:38:44.120]  They cannot be trusted.
[01:38:44.120 --> 01:38:48.120]  None of them.
[01:38:48.120 --> 01:38:49.120]  All right.
[01:38:49.120 --> 01:38:50.120]  Sorry, Jermaine, man.
[01:38:50.120 --> 01:38:51.120]  Get with it.
[01:38:51.120 --> 01:38:53.120]  Figure out what the hell's going on.
[01:38:53.120 --> 01:38:56.120]  Read the statutes and the rules of procedure and the rules of evidence.
[01:38:56.120 --> 01:38:59.120]  Make sure you understand what this guy is supposed to be doing for you.
[01:38:59.120 --> 01:39:01.120]  I got to get these other callers.
[01:39:01.120 --> 01:39:02.120]  I got a full board.
[01:39:02.120 --> 01:39:03.120]  Okay.
[01:39:03.120 --> 01:39:07.120]  I'll give you a call back next weekend and try to keep you updated
[01:39:07.120 --> 01:39:08.120]  and get more information.
[01:39:08.120 --> 01:39:09.120]  All right.
[01:39:09.120 --> 01:39:10.120]  Good luck.
[01:39:10.120 --> 01:39:11.120]  Okay.
[01:39:11.120 --> 01:39:12.120]  All right.
[01:39:12.120 --> 01:39:13.120]  Bye-bye.
[01:39:13.120 --> 01:39:18.120]  I've got, I don't really know what this one is, M. Ballou and Sharon.
[01:39:18.120 --> 01:39:21.120]  Hello?
[01:39:21.120 --> 01:39:22.120]  Hello?
[01:39:22.120 --> 01:39:23.120]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:39:23.120 --> 01:39:24.120]  Yeah.
[01:39:24.120 --> 01:39:26.120]  Who am I talking to?
[01:39:26.120 --> 01:39:28.120]  It's Kev in Michigan.
[01:39:28.120 --> 01:39:29.120]  Okay.
[01:39:29.120 --> 01:39:32.120]  What's up, Kev in Michigan?
[01:39:32.120 --> 01:39:34.120]  Not much, man.
[01:39:34.120 --> 01:39:45.120]  I got an issue with out-of-state debtors, Florida child support issue, right?
[01:39:45.120 --> 01:39:47.120]  Okay.
[01:39:47.120 --> 01:39:53.120]  This judge is, I know this is a due process issue.
[01:39:53.120 --> 01:39:57.120]  This judge is garnishing my change and...
[01:39:57.120 --> 01:39:58.120]  This judge where?
[01:39:58.120 --> 01:40:01.120]  Can't do it in Florida.
[01:40:01.120 --> 01:40:02.120]  Okay.
[01:40:02.120 --> 01:40:03.120]  And you're in Michigan.
[01:40:03.120 --> 01:40:04.120]  Yeah.
[01:40:04.120 --> 01:40:05.120]  And I'm all the way in.
[01:40:05.120 --> 01:40:06.120]  Yeah.
[01:40:06.120 --> 01:40:07.120]  And where are the children?
[01:40:07.120 --> 01:40:08.120]  Trying to...
[01:40:08.120 --> 01:40:09.120]  Where's the what?
[01:40:09.120 --> 01:40:11.120]  Where are the children?
[01:40:11.120 --> 01:40:13.120]  In Florida.
[01:40:13.120 --> 01:40:15.120]  Okay.
[01:40:15.120 --> 01:40:19.120]  So what then is your question?
[01:40:19.120 --> 01:40:26.120]  There's a statue in Florida that exempts me from a garnishment, any type of garnishment.
[01:40:26.120 --> 01:40:30.120]  What statute is that?
[01:40:30.120 --> 01:40:36.120]  It's the head of family exemption.
[01:40:36.120 --> 01:40:38.120]  It's called a head of family exemption.
[01:40:38.120 --> 01:40:50.120]  Do you have a specific statute number?
[01:40:50.120 --> 01:41:00.120]  Yeah, he got it on me right now, but I think it's in 222, I think 1111 statute.
[01:41:00.120 --> 01:41:04.120]  Are there any dots or dashes in this?
[01:41:04.120 --> 01:41:13.120]  Yeah, I think the 222s are separated.
[01:41:13.120 --> 01:41:14.120]  With dashes or dots?
[01:41:14.120 --> 01:41:20.120]  From the 11 dot.
[01:41:20.120 --> 01:41:24.120]  222.11?
[01:41:24.120 --> 01:41:25.120]  Yep.
[01:41:25.120 --> 01:41:29.120]  I think that's the head of family exemption right there.
[01:41:29.120 --> 01:41:30.120]  All right.
[01:41:30.120 --> 01:41:31.120]  Right here.
[01:41:31.120 --> 01:41:33.120]  222, 11.
[01:41:33.120 --> 01:41:35.120]  Exemption of wages from garnishment.
[01:41:35.120 --> 01:41:40.120]  As used in this section, the term earnings, blah, blah, blah, we go through the definitions of it.
[01:41:40.120 --> 01:41:42.120]  Okay.
[01:41:42.120 --> 01:41:45.120]  Let's see, A, earnings, B, disposable earnings.
[01:41:45.120 --> 01:41:52.120]  Head of family includes any natural person who is providing more than one half of the support for a child or other dependent.
[01:41:52.120 --> 01:42:01.120]  All of the disposable earnings, disposable earnings be written the same language, contained, be substantially.
[01:42:01.120 --> 01:42:02.120]  All right.
[01:42:02.120 --> 01:42:04.120]  Here's the caveat to what you're saying.
[01:42:04.120 --> 01:42:09.120]  You said that this garnishment is for child support, right?
[01:42:09.120 --> 01:42:10.120]  Okay.
[01:42:10.120 --> 01:42:19.120]  Are you paying more than one half of the support for the child directly yourself?
[01:42:19.120 --> 01:42:20.120]  No.
[01:42:20.120 --> 01:42:24.120]  Then this statute does not protect you from garnishment.
[01:42:24.120 --> 01:42:37.120]  The statute says very plainly, if you provide more than one half of the support for a child or other dependent, all or part of your income is exempt from garnishment under Florida law.
[01:42:37.120 --> 01:42:40.120]  You just admitted you're not paying that.
[01:42:40.120 --> 01:42:46.120]  This statute does not exempt you.
[01:42:46.120 --> 01:42:47.120]  Okay.
[01:42:47.120 --> 01:42:56.120]  I thought it was saying that if I have a household and I'm paying half of more than four, but dependent on my household.
[01:42:56.120 --> 01:42:58.120]  It doesn't designate household here.
[01:42:58.120 --> 01:43:01.120]  It says head of family, but it doesn't show household.
[01:43:01.120 --> 01:43:09.120]  In other words, what you're trying to do is draw a line between the kids in this household versus the kids in the household in Florida.
[01:43:09.120 --> 01:43:10.120]  Yeah.
[01:43:10.120 --> 01:43:11.120]  No.
[01:43:11.120 --> 01:43:17.120]  The kids in Florida are just as much your responsibility as the ones in the household you have in Michigan.
[01:43:17.120 --> 01:43:23.120]  Now, are they from the same family or are they from different families?
[01:43:23.120 --> 01:43:24.120]  Different moms.
[01:43:24.120 --> 01:43:32.120]  Okay. Then odds are this statute does not protect you from garnishment.
[01:43:32.120 --> 01:43:33.120]  Okay.
[01:43:33.120 --> 01:43:37.120]  I got another one too, Eddie.
[01:43:37.120 --> 01:43:38.120]  All right.
[01:43:38.120 --> 01:43:41.120]  Well, hang on just a second and I'll try to get that done as quick as I can.
[01:43:41.120 --> 01:43:42.120]  All right.
[01:43:42.120 --> 01:43:43.120]  Everybody else is still on the board.
[01:43:43.120 --> 01:43:44.120]  Hang on.
[01:43:44.120 --> 01:43:45.120]  I got one segment left.
[01:43:45.120 --> 01:43:48.120]  I am going to do my best to get to everybody, so y'all hang on.
[01:43:48.120 --> 01:43:49.120]  All right, folks.
[01:43:49.120 --> 01:43:51.120]  We'll be right back after this break.
[01:43:51.120 --> 01:44:00.120]  Rule of Law Radio, y'all hold on.
[01:44:00.120 --> 01:44:05.120]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:05.120 --> 01:44:09.120]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:44:09.120 --> 01:44:14.120]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too.
[01:44:14.120 --> 01:44:20.120]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:44:20.120 --> 01:44:24.120]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[01:44:24.120 --> 01:44:26.120]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:44:26.120 --> 01:44:29.120]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:44:29.120 --> 01:44:33.120]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.120 --> 01:44:38.120]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.120 --> 01:44:41.120]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:41.120 --> 01:44:49.120]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.120 --> 01:45:00.120]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:00.120 --> 01:45:03.120]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.120 --> 01:45:07.120]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.120 --> 01:45:15.120]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.120 --> 01:45:19.120]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.120 --> 01:45:23.120]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.120 --> 01:45:28.120]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.120 --> 01:45:34.120]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.120 --> 01:45:43.120]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.120 --> 01:45:52.120]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.120 --> 01:46:17.120]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:17.120 --> 01:46:22.120]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:22.120 --> 01:46:26.120]  All right, Kevin, go ahead. What's your other question?
[01:46:26.120 --> 01:46:42.120]  Yeah, I want to know what's the best way to word a disqualification for a judge that puts a bond on you for misdemeanor if you already challenged your jurisdiction?
[01:46:42.120 --> 01:46:51.120]  Well, again, what is the procedure in Michigan for getting a judge disqualified?
[01:46:51.120 --> 01:46:55.120]  I see the procedure here. I'm just wanting to know some relevant points.
[01:46:55.120 --> 01:47:00.120]  Well, it depends on exactly what points it is you're trying to disqualify on.
[01:47:00.120 --> 01:47:11.120]  You can get them on failure to properly apply and follow the rules of procedure, the rules of evidence, violation of the judicial canons, failure to be fair and impartial.
[01:47:11.120 --> 01:47:13.120]  There's all kinds of reasons you can do it.
[01:47:13.120 --> 01:47:29.120]  The problem here is is setting a bond doesn't necessarily qualify for that, and it depends on what you challenge the jurisdiction of and how as to whether or not you did it well enough to establish he didn't have the power to set a bond.
[01:47:29.120 --> 01:47:36.120]  Well, you know, when you walk up, I said I'm here to challenge the jurisdiction of this. I'm here by special appearance to challenge the jurisdiction of this court.
[01:47:36.120 --> 01:47:46.120]  Okay. I got that part. I know how that works. My question is, on what grounds did you challenge the jurisdiction of the court?
[01:47:46.120 --> 01:47:50.120]  What were the charges?
[01:47:50.120 --> 01:47:57.120]  They were, you know, C-Bell, you know, to produce the office license.
[01:47:57.120 --> 01:48:07.120]  Okay. And so what was your evidence that you brought to court with you to say, hey, look, you don't have jurisdiction over me under these statutes for this reason?
[01:48:07.120 --> 01:48:11.120]  Just an affidavit, an affidavit.
[01:48:11.120 --> 01:48:20.120]  Well, an affidavit is not evidence of anything until someone takes the stand, testifies to the facts in it, and it's admitted as evidence for that purpose.
[01:48:20.120 --> 01:48:29.120]  An affidavit alone doesn't do anything until someone testifies to the facts in it.
[01:48:29.120 --> 01:48:41.120]  Okay. And also notices to show nature and cause of the offense. And also, let's see what the other one was.
[01:48:41.120 --> 01:48:44.120]  Did you file these in writing?
[01:48:44.120 --> 01:48:49.120]  Yep. Declination to plea also because I hadn't had proper notice.
[01:48:49.120 --> 01:48:52.120]  You filed all of this in writing?
[01:48:52.120 --> 01:48:56.120]  Yep. Everything was in writing. I let the judge see it and everything.
[01:48:56.120 --> 01:49:02.120]  Wait a minute. You let the judge see it. Are you saying you took it to court with you the same day?
[01:49:02.120 --> 01:49:04.120]  Yep.
[01:49:04.120 --> 01:49:05.120]  Why?
[01:49:05.120 --> 01:49:08.120]  The same. Why?
[01:49:08.120 --> 01:49:11.120]  I asked you first.
[01:49:11.120 --> 01:49:16.120]  This stuff is supposed to be filed long before you ever get to court.
[01:49:16.120 --> 01:49:19.120]  It is on the way, man. This is the...
[01:49:19.120 --> 01:49:26.120]  I don't care what it is. It was at least 10 days after you got the citations, right?
[01:49:26.120 --> 01:49:28.120]  Yep. It was around that time.
[01:49:28.120 --> 01:49:37.120]  Okay. So any time within that 10 days, you could have filed these motions in that court and given them an opportunity to be heard, right?
[01:49:37.120 --> 01:49:43.120]  So what you did was cut your own throat in challenging the jurisdiction by going in and saying, hey, I got these motions.
[01:49:43.120 --> 01:49:48.120]  I haven't let you read yet and I want you to stop what you're doing.
[01:49:48.120 --> 01:49:56.120]  Well, I want to set a bond for you and then we'll set a hearing on your motions so we can figure out whether or not we need to be doing anything about it.
[01:49:56.120 --> 01:50:01.120]  You see the problem you put yourself in by waiting to the last minute?
[01:50:01.120 --> 01:50:03.120]  Yeah. I didn't think it was the last minute because...
[01:50:03.120 --> 01:50:08.120]  If you took it the day you were supposed to appear, how is it not last minute?
[01:50:08.120 --> 01:50:12.120]  No. The declination to plea was the last minute.
[01:50:12.120 --> 01:50:17.120]  I asked you if you took all of these to court on the same day. You said yes, did you not?
[01:50:17.120 --> 01:50:23.120]  No. I'm sorry. The nature and cause was the first thing I filed when I went within those 10 days.
[01:50:23.120 --> 01:50:28.120]  And how far in advance did you file that?
[01:50:28.120 --> 01:50:35.120]  I filed it about maybe two weeks in advance from the arraignment.
[01:50:35.120 --> 01:50:40.120]  Okay. And who did you file a copy with?
[01:50:40.120 --> 01:50:41.120]  The clerk of the court.
[01:50:41.120 --> 01:50:45.120]  Did you serve the other party?
[01:50:45.120 --> 01:50:48.120]  There was no other party. When I got there...
[01:50:48.120 --> 01:50:53.120]  There's a prosecuting attorney that's going to be prosecuting this case somewhere, isn't there?
[01:50:53.120 --> 01:50:56.120]  Yeah, but I didn't know who he was.
[01:50:56.120 --> 01:50:57.120]  Did you ask?
[01:50:57.120 --> 01:51:10.120]  No. It was the same type of pleadings that show that since I haven't been properly served, I only filed a copy with this court. That's what I put in it.
[01:51:10.120 --> 01:51:17.120]  Okay. And they didn't hold any hearing on that the day of or even look at it the day of?
[01:51:17.120 --> 01:51:18.120]  No.
[01:51:18.120 --> 01:51:19.120]  Okay.
[01:51:19.120 --> 01:51:22.120]  No. She just read me the... She just read me the rights.
[01:51:22.120 --> 01:51:26.120]  Well, then what you need to do is to make the allegation for disqualification.
[01:51:26.120 --> 01:51:31.120]  The judge is not treating you fairly and impartially. The judge is not following the rules of evidence.
[01:51:31.120 --> 01:51:38.120]  The judge is violating the judicial canons, etc., etc. And you need to look up what each one of those is.
[01:51:38.120 --> 01:51:44.120]  Assuming from the way you're talking, you've got these motions from the seminar material, right?
[01:51:44.120 --> 01:51:45.120]  Yeah.
[01:51:45.120 --> 01:51:55.120]  Then there is a motion to disqualify in there that tells you exactly how to write one. You just need to make sure you use the judicial canons for your state. They should be the exact same thing.
[01:51:55.120 --> 01:51:56.120]  That's pretty good, too.
[01:51:56.120 --> 01:51:57.120]  Huh?
[01:51:57.120 --> 01:52:09.120]  Yeah. I said the Dow website is pretty good, too. It lets you read up on stuff and how to figure out the coinciding law in your state.
[01:52:09.120 --> 01:52:13.120]  Okay. That's fine. I don't know what you're talking about, but that's fine if you've got something you can use.
[01:52:13.120 --> 01:52:23.120]  But either way, you just need to make sure that the judicial canons for your state, which should be the exact same thing, but just make sure. Okay?
[01:52:23.120 --> 01:52:26.120]  Okay. All right. All right. God bless you, Eddie.
[01:52:26.120 --> 01:52:29.120]  All right, man. Have a good night.
[01:52:29.120 --> 01:52:30.120]  Yep.
[01:52:30.120 --> 01:52:35.120]  All right. Now we've got Mark in Florida. Mark, what do you got?
[01:52:35.120 --> 01:52:42.120]  Now a quick question first. How big is the download on your course, roughly?
[01:52:42.120 --> 01:52:58.120]  The original one is 64 gigs. The new one is 96 gigs if you get all the extras, the videos and everything that I've put together to show people what not to do and how to do it and so on and so forth.
[01:52:58.120 --> 01:53:09.120]  There's all kinds of extra materials in the one that you actually get directly from me. But the one that we download, the original download is approximately 64 gigabytes.
[01:53:09.120 --> 01:53:14.120]  Okay. I didn't see any videos on the website.
[01:53:14.120 --> 01:53:28.120]  The download doesn't have the videos. That's the only thing about the download. We don't have nearly enough space to put the videos up there. The videos are 250 some odd gig for the videos.
[01:53:28.120 --> 01:53:33.120]  Wow. Okay. You have those on desk or what?
[01:53:33.120 --> 01:53:41.120]  If – yeah, I have – well, you should have the MP3s in there, but the actual videos aren't going to be in there.
[01:53:41.120 --> 01:53:55.120]  And yeah, I've got them on disk, but it takes a hard drive to hold them. You're not going to – and I'm guessing at the 256 gig, those are the culled down versions of them. The raw video is bigger than that.
[01:53:55.120 --> 01:54:12.120]  Yeah. Okay. All right. I had the arraignment the other week. Now, this – the paperwork I signed for the officer for him not to take me to jail, agreeing to –
[01:54:12.120 --> 01:54:14.120]  Your promise to appear, right?
[01:54:14.120 --> 01:54:38.120]  Right. And it was a civil charge. I read it carefully before I signed everything. And when I checked the computer at a later date, the clerk's file, that had been subsection one of that statute is civil, subsection two is a second degree misdemeanor, 60 days in jail.
[01:54:38.120 --> 01:54:59.120]  That had been scribbled out. It looked like it may be a two, but you can't really tell. And the judge admitted she could not read it. And I'm arguing jurisdiction. You know, I haven't been properly notified of the charge and so forth.
[01:54:59.120 --> 01:55:00.120]  Right.
[01:55:00.120 --> 01:55:09.120]  And of course, the prosecutor didn't hardly chirp in at all except he said, it's a two, Your Honor. She said, oh, very well, it's a two then.
[01:55:09.120 --> 01:55:11.120]  Okay.
[01:55:11.120 --> 01:55:38.120]  She read my six-page challenge to jurisdiction in less than 30 seconds, and I called her on it. I said, you couldn't have possibly read that before you ruled. I got that on the record. What I'm calling for is what barred grievances would you file against this prosecutor?
[01:55:38.120 --> 01:55:46.120]  Or either he changed the charge or the cop changed the charge. I'm arguing that it's a contract and it's void because it got changed.
[01:55:46.120 --> 01:55:59.120]  No, not going to work that way. They are free to amend the complaint any time they want, as long as it's prior to trial.
[01:55:59.120 --> 01:56:02.120]  Don't they have to file an amendment in the record?
[01:56:02.120 --> 01:56:18.120]  Well, if they haven't actually filed the complaint, and this was all done on a citation, there isn't going to be an amended complaint. It'll still be an original complaint because it hadn't been filed yet, which brings the issue of do they have jurisdiction to act unless the complaint has been filed?
[01:56:18.120 --> 01:56:27.120]  And if it's a misdemeanor, are they required to get an indictment or something else to go with it as a charging instrument, an information perhaps?
[01:56:27.120 --> 01:56:36.120]  Well, what invokes the jurisdiction of the court, the citation, the complaint, or the information?
[01:56:36.120 --> 01:56:37.120]  The information.
[01:56:37.120 --> 01:56:42.120]  Did they have one? Were you given a copy of it, etc., etc.?
[01:56:42.120 --> 01:56:44.120]  There's none in the record.
[01:56:44.120 --> 01:56:51.120]  Okay, then how does the court have jurisdiction to do anything that it's done?
[01:56:51.120 --> 01:56:54.120]  That's what I brought up in court. I brought all that up in court.
[01:56:54.120 --> 01:56:57.120]  Then you need to file judicial conduct complaints against the judge.
[01:56:57.120 --> 01:56:58.120]  Fairly well.
[01:56:58.120 --> 01:57:08.120]  Yeah. File judicial conduct complaints, get the judge disqualified for failure to follow the rules of procedure, including violation of your right to notice.
[01:57:08.120 --> 01:57:19.120]  All she wanted to do, see this is in a satellite courthouse, and all she wants to do is enter a plea on my behalf and put down for a jury trial. That gets me out of her court.
[01:57:19.120 --> 01:57:25.120]  Right. And that's all any of them want to do. That's what I keep trying to tell people. This has nothing to do with justice.
[01:57:25.120 --> 01:57:34.120]  Nobody wants to do their damn job at this level. Nobody. Because the only people that can set precedence is the appellate court.
[01:57:34.120 --> 01:57:40.120]  So nobody cares how they treat you at the trial level courts. They don't care.
[01:57:40.120 --> 01:57:46.120]  We'll run over your rights if you don't like it. See if the appellate court agrees with you. That's all they care about.
[01:57:46.120 --> 01:57:53.120]  That's not justice. Never will that be justice.
[01:57:53.120 --> 01:58:00.120]  All right, man. I am out of time. So disqualify the judge if you can. File judicial conduct complaints, whatever it takes.
[01:58:00.120 --> 01:58:07.120]  Bargrieve the prosecuting attorney for colluding with the judge to deprive you of the right of notice and blah, blah, blah.
[01:58:07.120 --> 01:58:11.120]  Okay. All right. You have a good one and good luck.
[01:58:11.120 --> 01:58:19.120]  All right, folks. This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig. I want to thank all of y'all for listening and for all of you that have called in.
[01:58:19.120 --> 01:58:43.120]  I hope that y'all all have a great week. Good night and God bless.
[01:58:50.120 --> 01:58:58.120]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.120 --> 01:59:08.120]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.120 --> 01:59:20.120]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.120 --> 01:59:30.120]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.120 --> 01:59:32.120]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.120 --> 01:59:49.120]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.120 --> 02:00:03.120]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosradioNetwork.com.