[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.000 --> 00:28.000]  Markets for Friday the 5th of August 2016 are currently treading with gold at $1,336.29
[00:28.000 --> 00:35.000]  cents an ounce, silver $19.71 an ounce, Texas crude $41.93 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:35.000 --> 00:44.000]  sitting at about $581 U.S. currency.
[00:44.000 --> 00:49.000]  Today in history, the year, last year, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency at Gold
[00:49.000 --> 00:54.000]  King Mine accidentally releases a spill of 3 million gallons of heavy metal toxins and
[00:54.000 --> 01:00.000]  wastewater into the Animas River in Colorado, poisoning the water supply of the Navajo Nation,
[01:00.000 --> 01:02.000]  who later filed a suit against the EPA.
[01:02.000 --> 01:07.000]  Today in history.
[01:07.000 --> 01:12.000]  In recent news, Fairfax, Virginia County police arrested their mayor, Richard Scott Silverthorn,
[01:12.000 --> 01:16.000]  on charges of distributing methamphetamines as part of a meth-for-sex scheme.
[01:16.000 --> 01:20.000]  He was arrested Thursday after he allegedly provided meth to an undercover officer who
[01:20.000 --> 01:24.000]  met him at a hotel. Silverthorn, who is currently serving his third term as mayor, was charged
[01:24.000 --> 01:29.000]  with a felony of distribution of meth and misdemeanor of possession of drug paraphernalia.
[01:29.000 --> 01:33.000]  Commander of the Organized Crime and Narcotics Division, Captain Jack Harden, told reporters
[01:33.000 --> 01:38.000]  that an investigation into the mayor's activities began three weeks ago after a citizen had
[01:38.000 --> 01:42.000]  told police that the mayor was distributing meth through a website used for casual hookups
[01:42.000 --> 01:43.000]  between men.
[01:43.000 --> 01:48.000]  Fairfax is a city of about 23,000, roughly 20 miles west of Washington, D.C., and was
[01:48.000 --> 01:58.000]  ranked number three by Forbes in an article on the top 25 places to live well.
[01:58.000 --> 02:03.000]  Located in Greenland, Camp Century, an abandoned and buried U.S. Army base used at a research
[02:03.000 --> 02:08.000]  station test site for deploying nuclear missiles, is raising concerns from scientists who fear
[02:08.000 --> 02:12.000]  that the melting of the ice sheet under which the base was buried nearly five decades ago
[02:12.000 --> 02:17.000]  will expose vast amounts of chemical pollutants left behind by the Army, which could spread
[02:17.000 --> 02:20.000]  and have really negative consequences.
[02:20.000 --> 02:24.000]  Everything from radioactive cooling water to diesel fuel for generators and vehicles
[02:24.000 --> 02:29.000]  and sumps dug into the snow storing human waste were left behind when the base was shut
[02:29.000 --> 02:34.000]  down due to the impracticality of Project Iceworm, an effort to dig tunnels under the
[02:34.000 --> 02:39.000]  ice cap which could deliver nuclear bombs to Russia in case the Cold War went hot.
[02:39.000 --> 02:44.000]  Climate computer models say that the camp could be uncovered by the end of the century.
[02:44.000 --> 02:47.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently for sponsors.
[02:47.000 --> 02:50.000]  If you have a product or a service you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give
[02:50.000 --> 02:54.000]  me a call at 210-363-2257.
[02:54.000 --> 03:17.000]  This is Rick Roady with your Bowdown for August 5th, 2016.
[03:17.000 --> 03:27.000]  Thanks for watching.
[03:47.000 --> 03:51.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree.
[03:51.000 --> 03:57.000]  Round up all of them bad boys in the highest tree.
[03:57.000 --> 04:01.000]  For all the people to see.
[04:01.000 --> 04:05.000]  That justice is the one thing you should always find.
[04:05.000 --> 04:09.000]  You gotta saddle up your boys, you gotta draw a hard line.
[04:09.000 --> 04:17.000]  When the gun smoke settles, we'll sing a victory tune and we'll haul me back at the
[04:17.000 --> 04:18.000]  horse's hooves.
[04:18.000 --> 04:22.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing.
[04:22.000 --> 04:35.000]  Let's get for my men, bear for my horses.
[04:35.000 --> 04:39.000]  Alright folks, good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show.
[04:39.000 --> 04:43.000]  I hope everybody's week is starting off very well.
[04:43.000 --> 04:49.000]  It is, oh my, it is August 8th.
[04:49.000 --> 04:52.000]  Aren't we getting through the year here?
[04:52.000 --> 04:57.000]  Alright, y'all have to kind of pardon me, I am pulling double duty here, doing the show
[04:57.000 --> 04:59.000]  and running the board and all that stuff.
[04:59.000 --> 05:03.000]  And right now my web browser is acting like it's running through a wet concrete.
[05:03.000 --> 05:05.000]  But other than that, things are great.
[05:05.000 --> 05:14.000]  Alright, news flash, the documentary movie Wake Up America, in which I am a person of
[05:14.000 --> 05:21.000]  interest, as is Dave Champion and numerous other people, is now up for viewing in a trailer
[05:21.000 --> 05:22.000]  fashion.
[05:22.000 --> 05:29.000]  You can see the trailer for it by going to the website wakeupamericathemovie.com.
[05:29.000 --> 05:34.000]  You can go there and see the trailer for this and see what is coming.
[05:34.000 --> 05:38.000]  And believe me folks, they got enough footage in this movie to make two or three sequels.
[05:38.000 --> 05:41.000]  And the things that we're going to be talking about in it and the things we're going to
[05:41.000 --> 05:47.000]  be exposing in it and the solutions we're hopefully providing in it will be of interest
[05:47.000 --> 05:48.000]  to you all.
[05:48.000 --> 05:57.000]  We're working on trying to get the same dissemination internationally and nationally as the movies
[05:57.000 --> 06:00.000]  that are being put out with Dinesh D'Souza on his books.
[06:00.000 --> 06:06.000]  So hopefully we'll be able to get into a lot of places really fast and get a lot of information
[06:06.000 --> 06:07.000]  in people's hands.
[06:07.000 --> 06:14.000]  Now, this is also going to spark a movie involving Dave Champion and a lot of other people in
[06:14.000 --> 06:16.000]  the tax honesty movement.
[06:16.000 --> 06:18.000]  And that's going to be a good thing.
[06:18.000 --> 06:24.000]  This is going to be right up there with Freedom to Fascism when that part of this movie gets
[06:24.000 --> 06:25.000]  done and out.
[06:25.000 --> 06:27.000]  It's going to be a great thing.
[06:27.000 --> 06:29.000]  Believe me it is.
[06:29.000 --> 06:36.000]  There is Irwin Schiff, God bless him and rest his soul, a great man in the tax honesty movement,
[06:36.000 --> 06:42.000]  his son Peter trying to carry on and let people know what the federal government did to his
[06:42.000 --> 06:47.000]  father by keeping him in prison until he died as a political prisoner.
[06:47.000 --> 06:54.000]  And the things that that government has tried to do to everyone that knows the truth about
[06:54.000 --> 07:02.000]  the federal income tax and has attempted to expose it for the giant financial fraud that
[07:02.000 --> 07:11.000]  it is, it is, as Dave puts it, the world's largest financial fraud that's ever existed.
[07:11.000 --> 07:13.000]  It's in the history of the world.
[07:13.000 --> 07:19.000]  No one has perpetrated a bigger financial crime than the United States government.
[07:19.000 --> 07:21.000]  Now that doesn't just include the income tax.
[07:21.000 --> 07:26.000]  That, of course, goes with the federal banking acts, the Federal Reserve Act.
[07:26.000 --> 07:32.000]  Hand in hand with all of this stuff, our own government has undermined the economy of the
[07:32.000 --> 07:36.000]  entire world.
[07:36.000 --> 07:39.000]  No ifs, no ands, no buts.
[07:39.000 --> 07:45.000]  Our American government has undermined the economy of every country on this planet.
[07:45.000 --> 07:52.000]  And those that it could not get into, it has assassinated the leaders of.
[07:52.000 --> 07:56.000]  And that's just the facts.
[07:56.000 --> 08:00.000]  In the age of information, ignorance is a choice.
[08:00.000 --> 08:07.000]  And right now we've got far too many people choosing ignorance over truth.
[08:07.000 --> 08:13.000]  We have too many people that think that they know the truth when in fact you can show them
[08:13.000 --> 08:17.000]  where they don't and they're still not willing to accept it.
[08:17.000 --> 08:23.000]  Now I've published two or three new articles up on my website here in just the past week alone.
[08:23.000 --> 08:30.000]  One I haven't published yet, but I am working on transferring the audio into a still picture
[08:30.000 --> 08:37.000]  video form to at least make it more entertaining to listen to, mainly because WordPress
[08:37.000 --> 08:41.000]  apparently does not allow you to upload audio-only file formats.
[08:41.000 --> 08:45.000]  If it's not in a video format for some reason, it won't let me upload it.
[08:45.000 --> 08:48.000]  At least it doesn't on mine when it's hosted at WordPress.
[08:48.000 --> 08:53.000]  I could do it if I had it running on my own server, but I don't, so do what I can.
[08:53.000 --> 08:58.000]  Right now that means I'm having to add pictures and convert the audio to a video format.
[08:58.000 --> 09:01.000]  Yes, I could do it without the pictures, but it wouldn't be as entertaining.
[09:01.000 --> 09:08.000]  Anyway, in the conversation that this video is going to be about, you will hear me talking to a
[09:08.000 --> 09:19.000]  group of people by request to an XTABC law enforcement officer who has it in his mind
[09:19.000 --> 09:26.000]  that people in law enforcement and attorneys are the only people capable of even knowing
[09:26.000 --> 09:33.000]  what the law is, okay, when in fact I could demonstrate in any direct debate with this gentleman
[09:33.000 --> 09:37.000]  that he has no clue what the law actually is.
[09:37.000 --> 09:43.000]  What he thinks it is versus what it says and how it is connected to other parts of the law
[09:43.000 --> 09:50.000]  so that the context and application means something other than what he actually believes
[09:50.000 --> 09:53.000]  is a discussion he would rapidly fall behind on.
[09:53.000 --> 09:56.000]  I guarantee you it would be.
[09:56.000 --> 09:59.000]  And that is not meant to sound like I'm bragging about it.
[09:59.000 --> 10:02.000]  It's just simply the fact that I study it.
[10:02.000 --> 10:05.000]  I don't just read it, I study it.
[10:05.000 --> 10:10.000]  I connect every other, as the courts would call it, imperamatera,
[10:10.000 --> 10:15.000]  reference to that same subject matter in any other statute of code that I can find
[10:15.000 --> 10:20.000]  so that I have as complete a picture as possible.
[10:20.000 --> 10:25.000]  Then once I have all of the interrelated statutes on a given subject,
[10:25.000 --> 10:34.000]  I go look at the actual original law for those statutes and whatever act those statutes are part of.
[10:34.000 --> 10:40.000]  Then after I have the statutes as they exist and the original law as it was written,
[10:40.000 --> 10:46.000]  I go to the case law relevant to any of those statutes and the original law on that subject.
[10:46.000 --> 10:51.000]  I put as many pieces of that puzzle into one place,
[10:51.000 --> 10:58.000]  connected the way that everything says it has to connect to try to see the whole picture.
[10:58.000 --> 11:01.000]  Now you know when you're putting together a jigsaw puzzle,
[11:01.000 --> 11:05.000]  most people will be looking at the picture on the cover of the box
[11:05.000 --> 11:10.000]  and trying to match the pieces they put together to match the picture on the box.
[11:10.000 --> 11:14.000]  When you're doing this, you don't have the luxury of the box top.
[11:14.000 --> 11:17.000]  You have to dump out the pieces.
[11:17.000 --> 11:22.000]  You have to put them together entirely by their shape.
[11:22.000 --> 11:28.000]  And you can only use the picture that's contained on the piece you have
[11:28.000 --> 11:33.000]  that will match the other pieces that you've already managed to put together.
[11:33.000 --> 11:37.000]  Now some of the pieces are easy, like the borders for instance.
[11:37.000 --> 11:42.000]  Most people that put these things together as a hobby will tell you always start with the borders.
[11:42.000 --> 11:49.000]  Take out every single piece that makes a border and start there.
[11:49.000 --> 11:56.000]  Then you put everything together until you get all the pieces put together into the center or some part of the center.
[11:56.000 --> 12:01.000]  You always get the border together first so that you know where the picture is contained
[12:01.000 --> 12:04.000]  and where everything else would have to go.
[12:04.000 --> 12:10.000]  Statutory research, legal research, case law research,
[12:10.000 --> 12:18.000]  original legislative enactment research can be done exactly and should be done in my opinion
[12:18.000 --> 12:25.000]  based upon the amount of work I've had to put into this, should be done in exactly the same way.
[12:25.000 --> 12:31.000]  You get all of the edges put together so that you know where the framework is.
[12:31.000 --> 12:35.000]  And then you put everything else together within it.
[12:35.000 --> 12:39.000]  This is something I would bet you that this gentleman that wants to argue with me
[12:39.000 --> 12:44.000]  over what the transportation code is, what the case law is and all this, has never done any of this stuff.
[12:44.000 --> 12:50.000]  In fact, he sent a message to one of the folks in that conversation earlier today or yesterday
[12:50.000 --> 13:01.000]  saying I wouldn't put too much stock in his motions to dismiss getting any success, basically is what he said.
[13:01.000 --> 13:08.000]  And yet part of the conversation we had during this discussion was the fact that the lower courts everywhere
[13:08.000 --> 13:17.000]  are completely corrupt in the application and practices that they follow of the actual law and the actual legal procedures.
[13:17.000 --> 13:22.000]  I can go into any justice or municipal court in this entire state.
[13:22.000 --> 13:26.000]  I can sit and watch the proceedings in that court.
[13:26.000 --> 13:33.000]  And I guarantee you if I am sitting there taking notes on violations of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
[13:33.000 --> 13:38.000]  the application of the law to the facts, and so on and so forth,
[13:38.000 --> 13:48.000]  I will never ever walk out of that court with a blank page, never.
[13:48.000 --> 13:56.000]  What is the purpose of Rules of Procedure if no one that is required to follow them does?
[13:56.000 --> 14:09.000]  How do you get due process in any proceeding where the court can do what it wants rather than what it is required to do?
[14:09.000 --> 14:12.000]  I mean, think about this.
[14:12.000 --> 14:17.000]  There is always a set of rules to any game being played.
[14:17.000 --> 14:26.000]  Now there may be different variations of the rules at any given house or household when it comes to how the game is played.
[14:26.000 --> 14:34.000]  But if you actually had a company or manufacturer sponsored tournament on that game,
[14:34.000 --> 14:38.000]  do you think they're going to be using house variations of the rules
[14:38.000 --> 14:46.000]  or are they going to use strictly the manufacturer's rules to the game in a tournament that they're sponsoring?
[14:46.000 --> 14:55.000]  So what happens when the manufacturer decides to change all the rules just for the tournament?
[14:55.000 --> 15:00.000]  Who's going to win that? Who's going to know how to play that?
[15:00.000 --> 15:06.000]  Yeah, and let's not forget they're not telling you before the tournament starts that they've changed the rules.
[15:06.000 --> 15:10.000]  So now when you roll a six on the dice, you only get to move two spaces.
[15:10.000 --> 15:13.000]  Why? Common core math.
[15:13.000 --> 15:20.000]  You did one throw, you rolled a six, divide that by six, and you get what?
[15:20.000 --> 15:24.000]  In common core math, you wind up with two, right?
[15:24.000 --> 15:28.000]  The point here being the rules of procedure are there for a reason.
[15:28.000 --> 15:30.000]  The courts are not following them.
[15:30.000 --> 15:42.000]  Now let's look at other rules the courts are not following in any common sense way that would make justice attainable by the people.
[15:42.000 --> 15:52.000]  Did you know that the federal Constitution specifically states in its body, not its amendments, but in its body,
[15:52.000 --> 16:01.000]  that when a state is party to an action, and it does not define whether that action constitutes a criminal matter or a civil matter,
[16:01.000 --> 16:14.000]  it just says an action, that the United States Supreme Court is the court of original jurisdiction in that matter.
[16:14.000 --> 16:21.000]  Now in case you don't understand the phrase original jurisdiction, it works like this.
[16:21.000 --> 16:37.000]  When a court is given specifically original jurisdiction over a particular type of case or subject matter, it is the only court that may hear the initial proceeding.
[16:37.000 --> 16:41.000]  The only court.
[16:41.000 --> 16:49.000]  Now it can go up from there on appeal to different courts that have appellate powers over the court doing the trial,
[16:49.000 --> 16:54.000]  but that court is the trial court is the only one that can hear the original case and argument.
[16:54.000 --> 17:02.000]  Hang on, we'll carry this on on the other side. We'll be right back.
[17:02.000 --> 17:06.000]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network?
[17:06.000 --> 17:11.000]  On top of the on-air talents, producers, and other hardworking individuals working behind the scenes,
[17:11.000 --> 17:16.000]  Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you.
[17:16.000 --> 17:20.000]  So we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year in our annual fundraisers,
[17:20.000 --> 17:24.000]  which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[17:24.000 --> 17:27.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution.
[17:27.000 --> 17:32.000]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks.
[17:32.000 --> 17:35.000]  First prize being a Spice Skull Lower Receiver.
[17:35.000 --> 17:37.000]  Second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[17:37.000 --> 17:39.000]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor.
[17:39.000 --> 17:45.000]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud.
[17:45.000 --> 17:50.000]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[17:50.000 --> 17:52.000]  The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser.
[17:52.000 --> 18:00.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:14.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:14.000 --> 18:20.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:20.000 --> 18:24.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons.
[18:24.000 --> 18:26.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:26.000 --> 18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:29.000 --> 18:33.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 19:01.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:11.000 --> 19:29.000]  All right, folks.
[19:29.000 --> 19:30.000]  We are back.
[19:30.000 --> 19:32.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:32.000 --> 19:38.000]  Now, I've got another segment, maybe two or one and a half, something like that, before I start taking calls.
[19:38.000 --> 19:44.000]  But I have opened up the phone lines if you want to get on, 512-646-1984.
[19:44.000 --> 19:49.000]  But let me continue on with this for a minute, and let's talk about some of this and see how this pans out.
[19:49.000 --> 19:59.000]  Now, given what the federal Constitution says about the United States Supreme Court being the court of original jurisdiction in any case where the state is a party,
[19:59.000 --> 20:12.000]  okay, in any action where the state is a party, that would mean that if the style of the case is the state of whatever versus someone or something,
[20:12.000 --> 20:20.000]  or someone or something versus the state of whatever, the court that case should be heard in first and foremost,
[20:20.000 --> 20:28.000]  as well as its original filing, according to the federal Constitution, should be the United States Supreme Court.
[20:28.000 --> 20:33.000]  Now, it doesn't say anything about federal issues, anything like that.
[20:33.000 --> 20:42.000]  It just specifically states that if the state is a party in the action, the United States Supreme Court is the court of original jurisdiction.
[20:42.000 --> 20:51.000]  Now, let's look at what they do in the states with all these petty anti-citation tickets and administrative law issues that they do and everything else.
[20:51.000 --> 20:56.000]  And let's take Texas as a direct example.
[20:56.000 --> 21:06.000]  The state of Texas, through its agents in the form of municipal police officers, municipal prosecutors, or county and district attorneys,
[21:06.000 --> 21:21.000]  or municipal judges, or justices of the peace, in these Class C and lower order civil cases, where they are the initiating party or a party thereto,
[21:21.000 --> 21:30.000]  they're filing these cases within these lower courts within the state, despite that clause in the federal Constitution that says they are not the court of original jurisdiction,
[21:30.000 --> 21:35.000]  despite what the state tries to give them jurisdiction over.
[21:35.000 --> 21:39.000]  Now, the other problem here is, like I said, these are all agents of the state.
[21:39.000 --> 21:42.000]  Let's look first at the cop. What's going on here?
[21:42.000 --> 21:49.000]  Well, the cop is both the accuser and the witness against you at trial, yes or no.
[21:49.000 --> 22:00.000]  The cop is also the person who is making a legal determination and conclusion in the field that you violated some state law or some municipal or county ordinance, right?
[22:00.000 --> 22:11.000]  But for the most part, if it's not based upon a state law, they cannot enforce any municipal ordinance or county ordinance against the public,
[22:11.000 --> 22:16.000]  because ordinances are not law under the Texas Constitution.
[22:16.000 --> 22:25.000]  So if they're enforcing state law, then how is it not true that the officer is acting as an agent of the state,
[22:25.000 --> 22:35.000]  both as the accuser and as the primary fact witness against you and the initiator of the cause of action, okay?
[22:35.000 --> 22:39.000]  Doesn't matter if he signs the complaint. He is the initiator.
[22:39.000 --> 22:47.000]  He made the allegation. He wrote the citation. He is the one that will be the primary fact witness.
[22:47.000 --> 22:56.000]  Anyone else, court clerks included, are using the citation issued by that officer as the beginning procedure for this court action,
[22:56.000 --> 23:09.000]  even though they're supposed to reduce that citation to a signed and sworn complaint before they do anything else, and they never do, or almost never do.
[23:09.000 --> 23:18.000]  And then if they do, of course, they don't put all of the necessary fact elements required to be proven in the complaint, making the complaint invalid to begin with
[23:18.000 --> 23:29.000]  and a violation of the right of due process, because it does not give full and accurate notice of the alleged offense or its nature and cause to the accused in the matter.
[23:29.000 --> 23:34.000]  Now, do you see how these due process violations are starting to rack up here real, real fast?
[23:34.000 --> 23:37.000]  But wait, there's more.
[23:37.000 --> 23:42.000]  Now, the prosecutor, of course, is acting to prosecute in the name of the state.
[23:42.000 --> 23:47.000]  And if you ask them, who are you here representing, that's what they're going to tell you, I represent the state.
[23:47.000 --> 23:58.000]  Now, yes, I know you've all heard similar arguments to this before and so on and so forth, but hear me out here because this has an actual twist to it, I promise.
[23:58.000 --> 24:08.000]  But the prosecutor is acting for all intents and purposes, regardless of who they actually are, as an agent of the state substituting for a county or district attorney
[24:08.000 --> 24:17.000]  if they're a municipal attorney or a hired gun attorney prosecuting this case, which they almost always are in a municipal court.
[24:17.000 --> 24:21.000]  In the JP court, it will be the county attorney.
[24:21.000 --> 24:28.000]  But in any case, they will all have to tell you the same thing, that they are there representing the state.
[24:28.000 --> 24:38.000]  Okay. So far, the state has two of its agents working against you in this matter.
[24:38.000 --> 24:51.000]  So let's talk about the presiding judge in the matter, who is overseeing everything that's occurring at trial and everything in between according to the way they're doing things.
[24:51.000 --> 25:00.000]  Even though they are required to be different magistrates for the purpose of due process, doing different things at different stages so that there is no conflict of interest.
[25:00.000 --> 25:18.000]  Let's take, for example, that in order for a magistrate to issue a warrant, the question becomes is would a neutral and detached magistrate issue the warrant if the same facts were presented to them?
[25:18.000 --> 25:28.000]  That's why the one that issues the warrant can't reasonably be the same one that presides over the issue involved in the warrant at trial.
[25:28.000 --> 25:38.000]  Because if so, they would have already been given facts and evidence outside of the presence of the accused in an ex parte proceeding.
[25:38.000 --> 25:46.000]  And it's called a statement of probable cause upon which to base that warrant.
[25:46.000 --> 25:50.000]  So when they go to trial, they're going to be already in the mindset, well, I issued a warrant for it.
[25:50.000 --> 25:55.000]  These facts all have to be true or at least they all have to be likely or I wouldn't be able to issue the warrant.
[25:55.000 --> 26:01.000]  Therefore, the accused probably did everything in here based upon the same evidence I'm going to hear at trial.
[26:01.000 --> 26:06.000]  Now, does anybody else see anything prejudicial in this little setup here?
[26:06.000 --> 26:13.000]  But you compound that by asking another simple question. Who do you represent in this matter?
[26:13.000 --> 26:16.000]  I represent the state.
[26:16.000 --> 26:30.000]  Now we have all three parties on the other side acting as agents for one entity against the accused, who, by the way, is denied assistance of counsel.
[26:30.000 --> 26:47.000]  And even if they were not, would be given counsel that would never, ever challenge a single one of these issues as a conflict of interest and a deprivation of rights, which every bit of this is.
[26:47.000 --> 26:51.000]  But now we have one final caveat.
[26:51.000 --> 26:57.000]  Okay. All three of you represent the state as its agents.
[26:57.000 --> 27:14.000]  Now the primary question is, is does the state receive any financial motivation or impetus or reward benefit of any kind for a guilty verdict in this case versus a not guilty verdict?
[27:14.000 --> 27:22.000]  Well, of course they do. The state collects 50% of the fines levied in the matter.
[27:22.000 --> 27:24.000]  You get that?
[27:24.000 --> 27:28.000]  The state's agents accuse you. The state's agents prosecute you.
[27:28.000 --> 27:38.000]  The state agents preside over whether or not anyone broke any of the rules of procedure or your right of due process or any of your fundamentally protected rights.
[27:38.000 --> 27:46.000]  And the state receives a financial benefit from finding you guilty.
[27:46.000 --> 27:53.000]  Hmm. Am I the only one that sees a problem with this?
[27:53.000 --> 28:18.000]  Now let's also look at the fact that they are filing the case in a court that according to the United States Constitution, since it says the state of versus whoever, you, that under the federal Constitution says must be filed at the level of the United States Supreme Court as the court of original jurisdiction.
[28:18.000 --> 28:24.000]  Something stinks. Well, a lot of somethings stink.
[28:24.000 --> 28:28.000]  And yet this has been going on for decades.
[28:28.000 --> 28:35.000]  Now I was talking with a friend of mine out in California today who does a lot of stuff for people out there, helps them out and does a lot of legal research as well.
[28:35.000 --> 29:04.000]  And he is currently trying to dig up because I have spent several years looking and I have yet to find a single case that revolves around that language in the United States Constitution and whether or not that particular action, as it puts, okay, involves only civil or involves civil and criminal or only criminal.
[29:04.000 --> 29:13.000]  Okay. If the state is a party to the action, what constitutes an action by the meaning specified in the United States Constitution?
[29:13.000 --> 29:34.000]  And if it applies to both civil and criminal, how then are these lower state courts that also, by the way, even if they were acting in their own capacities, get to keep 50% of the fine plus all of their court costs and fees that they may assess in relation to the prosecution.
[29:34.000 --> 29:48.000]  And you want to say they don't have a vested financial interest in finding you guilty because they don't get a dime if you're found innocent.
[29:48.000 --> 29:52.000]  But I guess I'm the only one that has a problem with that, apparently.
[29:52.000 --> 29:54.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[29:54.000 --> 30:16.000]  So y'all hang in there.
[30:16.000 --> 30:44.000]  We'll be right back.
[30:46.000 --> 30:50.000]  Use your laptop on your lap and you could become high-tech toast.
[30:50.000 --> 30:56.000]  Laptop temperatures can reach 125 degrees or more, superheating the surfaces where they're perched.
[30:56.000 --> 31:03.000]  If that surface is someplace on your body, you could get toasted skin syndrome, a condition that causes discolored, blotchy skin.
[31:03.000 --> 31:10.000]  You won't drop dead from toasted skin syndrome, but doctors say long-term laptop heat could permanently model your flesh.
[31:10.000 --> 31:16.000]  Well, that's just ugly. Laptop heating could even lead to skin cancer and cause infertility in men.
[31:16.000 --> 31:18.000]  So leave the toasting to the toaster.
[31:18.000 --> 31:24.000]  Put your laptop on a tabletop or shield your skin with a protective pad to head off this overheating health hazard.
[31:24.000 --> 31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:31.000 --> 31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.000 --> 31:43.000]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.000 --> 31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:46.000 --> 31:49.000]  And thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[31:49.000 --> 31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:53.000 --> 31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:54.000 --> 31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.000 --> 31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.000 --> 32:02.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:08.000 --> 32:13.000]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:20.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:26.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:36.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:51.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 33:02.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.000 --> 33:15.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:15.000 --> 33:29.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm gonna solve them, to the help of government them, prosecute them. Okay.
[33:29.000 --> 33:58.000]  All right.
[33:58.000 --> 34:00.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[34:00.000 --> 34:02.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[34:02.000 --> 34:07.000]  Caller number 512-646-1984.
[34:07.000 --> 34:09.000]  And, y'all, let's start taking callers here.
[34:09.000 --> 34:11.000]  Get in line if you want to call, folks.
[34:11.000 --> 34:13.000]  We'll be on that momentarily.
[34:13.000 --> 34:16.000]  Right now, we're gonna talk to Scott in Georgia.
[34:16.000 --> 34:19.000]  All right, Scott, what do you got?
[34:19.000 --> 34:21.000]  Wow.
[34:21.000 --> 34:24.000]  How'd you even know my name?
[34:24.000 --> 34:27.000]  All right, I got just a few questions.
[34:27.000 --> 34:33.000]  I might be getting off-subject, I don't know, but I've been looking at some of your descriptors as far as a traffic stop.
[34:33.000 --> 34:42.000]  Did the Supreme Court rule that police have to read Miranda rights when you're arrested or stopped?
[34:42.000 --> 34:48.000]  Well, originally, in Miranda, yeah, they said the officers had to advise you of your rights.
[34:48.000 --> 34:59.000]  But you also find, now, this is any time that they're going to question you, especially if it's a custodial questioning where you're actually placed under arrest.
[34:59.000 --> 35:09.000]  But any time you're put in a position where the questioning or anything like that could be invasive of your rights or cause you to waive them unknowingly,
[35:09.000 --> 35:14.000]  then they're required to give you your Miranda rights, as they're called, hence the name.
[35:14.000 --> 35:21.000]  But now, hang on a second, most state law also requires that they read you rights.
[35:21.000 --> 35:26.000]  For instance, here in Texas, they can't use any statements you make or anything else against you
[35:26.000 --> 35:37.000]  that they acquire under 38.22 Code of Criminal Procedure if they fail to Mirandize you before they do it.
[35:37.000 --> 35:45.000]  Okay. Does having an affidavit of truth help you at all in a traffic stop?
[35:45.000 --> 35:53.000]  Well, let me ask you this. How would a roll of toilet paper help you in a traffic stop?
[35:53.000 --> 36:02.000]  I don't know. Good question. All right. I really don't. I tried to read some of the affidavit of truth, but I don't understand it, really.
[36:02.000 --> 36:10.000]  The thing about it is the affidavit of truth is what I refer to as one of those patronet setups that really doesn't help them.
[36:10.000 --> 36:15.000]  The cop is not going to read it. He's being specifically trained not to take any paperwork from you
[36:15.000 --> 36:21.000]  that doesn't match the description of exactly what he asked you to give him. That's problem number one.
[36:21.000 --> 36:25.000]  So you can't hold the officer accountable under an affidavit he's never seen.
[36:25.000 --> 36:34.000]  Plus, what you're stating is facts the state may not necessarily see as a fact. Okay. And so on and so forth.
[36:34.000 --> 36:42.000]  Now, you can put things into a record, and you can do it in such a way that you've provided proper legal notice of them.
[36:42.000 --> 36:49.000]  A lot of these people think they can go down and file it with the court clerk or the county clerk, and thus they're covered.
[36:49.000 --> 36:59.000]  No. Nine times out of ten, that is absolutely untrue. In fact, most county clerks under their state law
[36:59.000 --> 37:07.000]  are only authorized to record very specific types of documents and instruments, and that's it.
[37:07.000 --> 37:17.000]  So there are other legal mechanisms to put yourself out there for public notice, one of which is publication in your local newspaper
[37:17.000 --> 37:25.000]  or a number of local newspapers over a certain period of days. Okay? Okay.
[37:25.000 --> 37:32.000]  So there are ways to put notices out there, but an affidavit of truth in your hands at a traffic stop or filed with a county clerk
[37:32.000 --> 37:45.000]  ain't doing you any good whatsoever that I have ever seen. Okay. All right. My vehicle... I'm sorry, your what?
[37:45.000 --> 37:55.000]  If my vehicle... I'm sorry, your what? I'm sorry, your what? My vehicle. Your vehicle. You're a commercial driver then?
[37:55.000 --> 38:05.000]  No. The vehicle identification number on my... If it's covered up and they can't see it, or I've got it covered up,
[38:05.000 --> 38:12.000]  and can they demand that I reveal it to them? Technically, I don't see how they could.
[38:12.000 --> 38:18.000]  But the issue here, though, is are you in a vehicle?
[38:18.000 --> 38:23.000]  Yeah. Am I driving or operating or traveling?
[38:23.000 --> 38:32.000]  Are you driving or operating or are you traveling? Yes. But can you travel in a vehicle?
[38:32.000 --> 38:40.000]  A lot of people don't know what vehicles are. Yeah, but you better. That's the point. You better.
[38:40.000 --> 38:48.000]  A vehicle is directly tied to driving and operating. Understand that. Okay.
[38:48.000 --> 39:01.000]  So when you say vehicle, you're not traveling, at least not in the nomenclature and definition of it as they are using it and understanding it.
[39:01.000 --> 39:11.000]  Okay. Okay, that's... You can say automobile, you can say private conveyance, but don't ever say vehicle. Don't ever say motor vehicle.
[39:11.000 --> 39:17.000]  Automobile? Automobile or private conveyance. Okay.
[39:17.000 --> 39:22.000]  Did the Supreme Court rule that a person's automobile is a consumer good?
[39:22.000 --> 39:37.000]  Wrong. That is inapplicable under these circumstances. That was specifically for the purpose of having those goods shipped as to whether or not they were taxable upon import.
[39:37.000 --> 39:46.000]  That's what that case was about. People are trying to use those damn UCC cases to make an invalid point.
[39:46.000 --> 39:52.000]  I had to tear a guy up about this on Facebook yesterday, and I went and made the moron famous on my blog.
[39:52.000 --> 40:05.000]  He is the subject of one of the articles on that blog that he put an entire half a page worth of bad case law, bad opinion, out of context sites and everything up there.
[40:05.000 --> 40:12.000]  And I went through and tore every one of them apart one by one. Okay.
[40:12.000 --> 40:21.000]  Don't ever read a case site on the Internet and accept it at face value. Don't ever do that.
[40:21.000 --> 40:30.000]  If you look at a court case and you want to know if it's true, you go find from a reliable source, a legitimate, authoritative source,
[40:30.000 --> 40:40.000]  like the court website where the opinion was issued, for instance, United States Supreme Court or the Federal Appellate Court, because they keep all those cases online.
[40:40.000 --> 40:52.000]  And you look that case up and you read the whole case, not just the blurb, because nine times out of ten, that blurb doesn't even exist in the case.
[40:52.000 --> 41:00.000]  Nothing in the case makes the inference of what the blurb says. Nothing in there includes any reference to what the blurb says.
[41:00.000 --> 41:06.000]  It's bad case law all the way around because it's a completely fabricated site.
[41:06.000 --> 41:11.000]  The other problem you have is when they misstate a site that is in the case.
[41:11.000 --> 41:16.000]  They change words, thus changing the meaning of the opinion as it was stated.
[41:16.000 --> 41:26.000]  Or they take it completely out of the context of what the opinion is about, just like the one you just asked me on on the consumer goods.
[41:26.000 --> 41:36.000]  Yeah. Okay. All right. Next question. Do I have to have a tag on my automobile?
[41:36.000 --> 41:45.000]  Do you? Well, it depends. What do we call them a tag here? Are you talking about a license plate? Are you talking about an inspection sticker or registration sticker?
[41:45.000 --> 41:47.000]  License plate.
[41:47.000 --> 41:57.000]  If the car and your state law recognizes a distinction, which most every one of them must, even though they may not be worded to make it clear.
[41:57.000 --> 42:03.000]  If it's not for commercial use, the answer would be no. Okay. Okay.
[42:03.000 --> 42:23.000]  But see, I've been pulled over a few times and what I have that has replaced my tag and the tag is my personal tag on my truck. It reads this traveling, not driving, not for hire, private, non-commercial use only.
[42:23.000 --> 42:30.000]  Navigator of this automobile is not under contract of a driver.
[42:30.000 --> 42:35.000]  There's simpler ways to say it, but okay.
[42:35.000 --> 42:41.000]  So when you've been pulled over, what was the result?
[42:41.000 --> 42:52.000]  Pretty much. I just told them that I'm just traveling and this is my personal property and that I'm not operating in consumer goods or for hire.
[42:52.000 --> 43:01.000]  They keep demanding a driver's license insurance and I just say am I under arrest if I committed a crime?
[43:01.000 --> 43:07.000]  And eventually they get tired of standing out in the sun and they probably tell me I'm free to go.
[43:07.000 --> 43:14.000]  Now in your state, are these considered criminal actions or are they civil infractions?
[43:14.000 --> 43:19.000]  Oh, I haven't checked into that. I don't know how would I check into that.
[43:19.000 --> 43:27.000]  You just have to see how it's defined. What is the nature of the allegation? Is it criminal, civil infraction, whatever?
[43:27.000 --> 43:32.000]  And generally your penal code or the case law or something up there will say that.
[43:32.000 --> 43:38.000]  Because normally if you are committing a crime, they'll use that to snatch you out of the car and do what they want.
[43:38.000 --> 43:46.000]  If they're letting you go, that indicates that it's possibly a civil infraction and they know they don't have any grounds to keep holding you.
[43:46.000 --> 43:50.000]  Hang on just a minute. I got a break to take and then we'll pick this up for you on the other side, okay?
[43:50.000 --> 43:52.000]  So hang on just a minute, Scott.
[43:52.000 --> 44:00.000]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. We'll be right back. Y'all hang in there.
[44:00.000 --> 44:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.000 --> 44:15.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:13.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas.
[45:13.000 --> 45:19.000]  I'm Brave New Books and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:31.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:38.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:48.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.000 --> 46:15.000]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:15.000 --> 46:20.000]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[46:20.000 --> 46:26.000]  If you could not reach anybody to love, would you purposefully die?
[46:26.000 --> 46:32.000]  Such a sentiment of soldier, a warrior of love, scuffle and they keep the peace.
[46:32.000 --> 46:48.000]  All they're taking is a misunderstanding. Somebody calls the police, watching the spotlight.
[46:48.000 --> 46:52.000]  Alright, we are back and we are talking to Scott in Georgia.
[46:52.000 --> 46:55.000]  Alright Scott, go ahead.
[46:55.000 --> 47:04.000]  Dude, if I get a driver's license, is that like a contract that I've signed with the state agreeing that I'll abide by all traffic laws?
[47:04.000 --> 47:14.000]  And if I don't have a driver's license or turn my driver's license in, as far as I know having a driver's license means you're operating in commerce or for hire?
[47:14.000 --> 47:18.000]  No. Here is where the patronuts also get that wrong.
[47:18.000 --> 47:22.000]  First off, the license itself is not a contract of anything.
[47:22.000 --> 47:27.000]  It cannot legally be so because the license is a contrived document.
[47:27.000 --> 47:34.000]  It is piecemealed from other documents that you sign when you do the application for the license.
[47:34.000 --> 47:44.000]  Okay, the application maybe if it meets the terms of an actual contract, the legal requirements of an actual contract.
[47:44.000 --> 47:57.000]  Now, the other issue here is a license only requires you to abide by the regulatory provisions of that license if and when the license is being used.
[47:57.000 --> 48:06.000]  In other words, you're exercising the benefit or privilege associated with the issuance and the license itself.
[48:06.000 --> 48:17.000]  So in order for a license to apply, period, you must be doing the thing that the license specifically authorizes you to do,
[48:17.000 --> 48:30.000]  which in this case would be to operate a motor vehicle as a driver for the purpose of engaging in commercial activity upon the highway.
[48:30.000 --> 48:36.000]  Okay. Mere possession of the license does not constitute use.
[48:36.000 --> 48:52.000]  Okay. If that were true, then let's say, does Georgia have any fishing game laws that say that you cannot catch fish with a net in a public lake or stream?
[48:52.000 --> 48:54.000]  I'm not sure about that.
[48:54.000 --> 49:01.000]  Okay. Let's say for the sake of argument for just a moment that it does, and people would look at that as things like gill netting,
[49:01.000 --> 49:07.000]  which is illegal in a lot of states and a lot of coastal areas and so on, but they don't let you use nets.
[49:07.000 --> 49:12.000]  You have to use a rod and reel or a trot line, something with an actual singular bait, right?
[49:12.000 --> 49:16.000]  And you can't use nets that have embedded hooks.
[49:16.000 --> 49:25.000]  Okay. So let's say your state law that if you have a fishing license says you can't do those things.
[49:25.000 --> 49:35.000]  But now you take a gill net or a hook net or a cast net or anything like that into your local food store,
[49:35.000 --> 49:43.000]  and you throw it into the bin where all the fish carcasses are, are you using your fishing license?
[49:43.000 --> 49:49.000]  No. Are you violating any of the provisions associated with the fishing license?
[49:49.000 --> 49:54.000]  If it says in a small print, then I would be violating it, yeah.
[49:54.000 --> 50:00.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. If you're not using it, how can you be violating it?
[50:00.000 --> 50:06.000]  Oh, yeah, I'm sorry. Yeah, yeah, then I'm, shouldn't be, yeah, correct.
[50:06.000 --> 50:11.000]  You see the problem with your original question then?
[50:11.000 --> 50:22.000]  Yeah. You have to be doing the thing that the license bestows the privilege for in order for anything relating to the license to apply.
[50:22.000 --> 50:28.000]  Okay. What would you put on a tag?
[50:28.000 --> 50:31.000]  Private property, non-commercial.
[50:31.000 --> 50:33.000]  Cool. Simple as that.
[50:33.000 --> 50:36.000]  That's all I would think.
[50:36.000 --> 50:37.000]  All right.
[50:37.000 --> 50:44.000]  You could put not for hire at the top, private property in the middle, non-commercial on the bottom.
[50:44.000 --> 50:47.000]  Cool. All right.
[50:47.000 --> 50:58.000]  If you're given a fine, traffic violation, from what I understand, what little I have read, and they fine you,
[50:58.000 --> 51:07.000]  that is a debt that you have to pay, and from what else I've read on the Constitution, that is a debt.
[51:07.000 --> 51:13.000]  And if you don't pay it, you can't be put in prison for it because there is no debtor's prison.
[51:13.000 --> 51:17.000]  That part's true depending upon what the actual offense is.
[51:17.000 --> 51:27.000]  If it's an offense for which the law itself defines it as fine only, in other words, the only punishment authorized by law is a fine.
[51:27.000 --> 51:34.000]  No incarceration, okay? No deprivation of liberty.
[51:34.000 --> 51:35.000]  Okay.
[51:35.000 --> 51:37.000]  Okay. That is what that means.
[51:37.000 --> 51:41.000]  So in this case, that would be 100% accurate.
[51:41.000 --> 51:55.000]  However, in a case where you have committed an actual crime and the fine associated with the prosecution is for restitution to the injured party,
[51:55.000 --> 52:01.000]  that is not a debt that you can claim debtor's prison for.
[52:01.000 --> 52:02.000]  Okay.
[52:02.000 --> 52:17.000]  Okay. Because that's a restitution for a harm. It's considered to be something different.
[52:17.000 --> 52:25.000]  Okay. The first concept of just a fine only offense, there's never a victim there. There is no tangible actual harm.
[52:25.000 --> 52:31.000]  That all goes back to the stuff I was saying at the very beginning of the show about the state just making up crap.
[52:31.000 --> 52:42.000]  Because not only is the state the singular moving party against you in this matter and a financial beneficiary of a guilty verdict, okay,
[52:42.000 --> 52:50.000]  but the state has that part of this going forward as well.
[52:50.000 --> 52:55.000]  All right. Last question.
[52:55.000 --> 53:05.000]  I saw in one of your videos on YouTube that you were going to have an app to download in case you were pulled over.
[53:05.000 --> 53:09.000]  Yeah, that app and the website we're attaching it to is still under development.
[53:09.000 --> 53:12.000]  Only two of us working on that. It is a massive undertaking.
[53:12.000 --> 53:17.000]  This would take a team of people three years to build and there's only two of us.
[53:17.000 --> 53:19.000]  So it is still under development.
[53:19.000 --> 53:26.000]  Right now there are lots of apps that are mimicking a small amount of what we are going to use this app for.
[53:26.000 --> 53:30.000]  Believe me, the one we're developing there is still nothing on the planet like it.
[53:30.000 --> 53:36.000]  But right now the closest one to it would be the ACLU app.
[53:36.000 --> 53:39.000]  Okay. That will be a live stream?
[53:39.000 --> 53:40.000]  Yes.
[53:40.000 --> 53:42.000]  With somebody. All right.
[53:42.000 --> 53:46.000]  Yeah. So until ours is going, use the ACLU app.
[53:46.000 --> 53:53.000]  Ours is going to have a whole lot of stuff that nobody has when we get done with this.
[53:53.000 --> 53:58.000]  Okay. How do I find out?
[53:58.000 --> 54:00.000]  How do you find out what?
[54:00.000 --> 54:03.000]  When you complete this, when it's done.
[54:03.000 --> 54:06.000]  Oh, believe me, if I get this done, it will be talked about on the show.
[54:06.000 --> 54:10.000]  It will be announced on the Rule of Law and the Logos Radio Network website.
[54:10.000 --> 54:13.000]  It will be on my blog. It will be everywhere.
[54:13.000 --> 54:14.000]  Cool.
[54:14.000 --> 54:23.000]  Now my blog, in case you didn't know where that is, is Taooflaw, T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W dot WordPress dot com.
[54:23.000 --> 54:25.000]  Great.
[54:25.000 --> 54:32.000]  All right, man. I am going to be a little more relaxed when I get behind the wheel.
[54:32.000 --> 54:43.000]  Well, I would study just so I would know what it is they think is going on and how they think things ought to work,
[54:43.000 --> 54:47.000]  because that will then give you points to use against them.
[54:47.000 --> 54:50.000]  Say you think this is what you think is going on.
[54:50.000 --> 54:55.000]  Go read this statute. It tells you very clearly this is not what's going on.
[54:55.000 --> 54:57.000]  Okay.
[54:57.000 --> 55:06.000]  The script that you have about when you ask the officer what's the emergency, how can I help you, can I read this script?
[55:06.000 --> 55:14.000]  Yeah, you can go download a copy of it at the logosradio network dot com forward slash T-A-O link.
[55:14.000 --> 55:18.000]  Go to that page and there's a link on there for that script.
[55:18.000 --> 55:25.000]  Okay. Well, what I'm saying is when I have the script and I pull it over, can I read straight from it?
[55:25.000 --> 55:30.000]  You can, but the script is meant to be internalized, to learn it.
[55:30.000 --> 55:35.000]  The thing is you have to understand the script is seven pages long, but here's the thing.
[55:35.000 --> 55:41.000]  The stuff that you actually have to know to say and when is exactly very small.
[55:41.000 --> 55:44.000]  It's less than a page. All right?
[55:44.000 --> 55:50.000]  Everything else in the script is explaining why you're doing what it's telling you to do.
[55:50.000 --> 55:51.000]  Okay.
[55:51.000 --> 55:56.000]  So the stuff you actually have to memorize is very small in comparison.
[55:56.000 --> 56:04.000]  But the reason you don't want to just read it is because you can't, you have to learn where to skip to,
[56:04.000 --> 56:09.000]  to read if they ask you something that's not in the same order that you're using.
[56:09.000 --> 56:10.000]  Right.
[56:10.000 --> 56:11.000]  All right?
[56:11.000 --> 56:19.000]  So if you give them a response, which of course they're recording, that doesn't match up with what they're asking you for or talking to you about,
[56:19.000 --> 56:22.000]  and you say something in the script that doesn't match any of that,
[56:22.000 --> 56:25.000]  you sound like you aren't keeping up with the conversation,
[56:25.000 --> 56:30.000]  which then allows them to make it look like this guy's impaired.
[56:30.000 --> 56:31.000]  Yeah.
[56:31.000 --> 56:32.000]  You follow?
[56:32.000 --> 56:39.000]  So the script is not meant to be read, it's meant to be memorized for a reason.
[56:39.000 --> 56:42.000]  Do they have to answer every question?
[56:42.000 --> 56:45.000]  Doesn't matter if they answer the question or not.
[56:45.000 --> 56:47.000]  It does not matter.
[56:47.000 --> 56:54.000]  The whole thing there is to simply state the reason you are doing what you are doing.
[56:54.000 --> 56:57.000]  Doesn't matter if they answer or not.
[56:57.000 --> 56:58.000]  Okay.
[56:58.000 --> 57:00.000]  This allows it to hear me.
[57:00.000 --> 57:01.000]  Exactly.
[57:01.000 --> 57:06.000]  The whole point of this is to set the stage later when they try to say that you were uncooperative,
[57:06.000 --> 57:13.000]  you can take that video and say, okay, right here, I asked you if I would be waiving any of my rights by giving you this information.
[57:13.000 --> 57:15.000]  You refused to answer me.
[57:15.000 --> 57:20.000]  Now, do I have a right not to waive my rights in this situation?
[57:20.000 --> 57:22.000]  I guess so.
[57:22.000 --> 57:27.000]  Well, then how was I being uncooperative by merely invoking my right to remain silent?
[57:27.000 --> 57:31.000]  Well, because the law says you've got to give me that information.
[57:31.000 --> 57:37.000]  So it's your testimony and belief and position then that the law can require me to waive my rights
[57:37.000 --> 57:42.000]  any time that you or the state wants me to so I don't really have any rights.
[57:42.000 --> 57:48.000]  You see how quickly you can turn that against them when they pull that crap just by asking those questions?
[57:48.000 --> 57:53.000]  Yeah, so if he continues to ask me for driver's license, insurance, and tax,
[57:53.000 --> 57:59.000]  I can just come back and tell him that that can be used against me in a court of law.
[57:59.000 --> 58:00.000]  I'm sorry, I can't.
[58:00.000 --> 58:01.000]  Exactly.
[58:01.000 --> 58:05.000]  Officer, if any of that information, as I've already said, can be used against me in a court of law
[58:05.000 --> 58:09.000]  to potentially incriminate me in some way, which I feel that it can,
[58:09.000 --> 58:13.000]  I'm not willing to waive my right to remain silent to comply with your demands.
[58:13.000 --> 58:20.000]  Are you going to punish me for my refusal to waive my rights?
[58:20.000 --> 58:25.000]  If he asks me to step out of the car that I am under arrest, do I have to know why?
[58:25.000 --> 58:29.000]  Yeah, you have the right to know why he's asking you to step out.
[58:29.000 --> 58:30.000]  All right, hang on, Scott.
[58:30.000 --> 58:34.000]  I've got another break and then I'm going to have to finish this up with you on the other side really quick
[58:34.000 --> 58:36.000]  because I've got other callers to get to.
[58:36.000 --> 58:38.000]  So hang on just a second, okay?
[58:38.000 --> 58:41.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[58:41.000 --> 58:44.000]  512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[58:44.000 --> 58:50.000]  We'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang in there.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:54.000 --> 58:58.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:02.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:02.000 --> 59:07.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.000 --> 59:28.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:44.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown,
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:29.000]  Markets for Friday, the 5th of August, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,336.29 an ounce,
[01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:35.000]  silver $19.71 an ounce, Texas crude $41.93 a barrel,
[01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $581 U.S. currency.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:51.000]  Today in history, the year, last year, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency at Gold King Mine
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:56.000]  accidentally releases a spill of 3 million gallons of heavy metal toxins and wastewater
[01:00:56.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  from the Animas River in Colorado, poisoning the water supply of the Navajo Nation,
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  who later filed a suit against the EPA.
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:08.000]  Today in history.
[01:01:08.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  In recent news, Fairfax, Virginia County police arrested their mayor, Richard Scott Silverthorn,
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  on charges of distributing methamphetamines as part of a meth-for-sex scheme.
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  He was arrested Thursday after he allegedly provided meth to an undercover officer who met him at a hotel.
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:27.000]  Silverthorn, who is currently serving his third term as mayor, was charged with a felony of distribution of meth
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  and misdemeanor of possession of drug paraphernalia.
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  Commander of the Organized Crime and Narcotics Division, Captain Jack Harden,
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  told reporters that an investigation into the mayor's activities began three weeks ago
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  after a citizen had told police that the mayor was distributing meth
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  through a website used for casual hookups between men.
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:49.000]  Fairfax is a city of about 23,000, roughly 20 miles west of Washington, D.C.,
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  and was ranked number three by Forbes in an article on the top 25 places to live well.
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:02.000]  Located in Greenland, Camp Century, an abandoned and buried U.S. Army base
[01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  used as a research station test site for deploying nuclear missiles,
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:11.000]  is raising concerns from scientists who fear that the melting of the ice sheet under which the base was buried
[01:02:11.000 --> 01:02:17.000]  nearly five decades ago will expose vast amounts of chemical pollutants left behind by the Army
[01:02:17.000 --> 01:02:20.000]  which could spread and have really negative consequences.
[01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:25.000]  Everything from radioactive cooling water to diesel fuel for generators and vehicles
[01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:30.000]  and sumps dug into the snow storing human waste were left behind when the base was shut down
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  due to the impacticality of Project Iceworm, an effort to dig tunnels under the ice cap
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  which could deliver nuclear bombs to Russia in case the Cold War went hot.
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:44.000]  Climate computer models say that the camp could be uncovered by the end of the century.
[01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently for sponsors.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:51.000]  If a product or a service you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give me a call at
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:03:15.000]  210-363-2257. This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for August 5th, 2016.
[01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio and we are going to wrap it up with Scott in Georgia.
[01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:34.000]  Alright Scott, what else you got?
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:36.000]  Two more questions.
[01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:37.000]  Alright.
[01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:41.000]  Threaten to arrest me for failure to ID.
[01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:49.000]  Again, what does the failure to ID law in Georgia say is a requirement of failure to ID?
[01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  Must you already be lawfully arrested for some other crime? Does Georgia have stop and frisk or stop and ID laws?
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:03:59.000]  Don't know.
[01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:06.000]  Right. And what is the criteria? Are you only required to give them verbally three pieces of information?
[01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:10.000]  What law requires you to produce a physical form of ID?
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:19.000]  I can't think of anyone since there is no law that can require you to obtain a physical form of state ID.
[01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:21.000]  Where would I find that information?
[01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  Well, I would say you look in the penal code under a failure to ID statute would be the first place to look.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  Okay. Alright.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:33.000]  Or whatever constitutes the penal code in Georgia.
[01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:42.000]  Okay. Last questions. If they threaten to break my window, should I let them break the window or?
[01:04:42.000 --> 01:04:45.000]  Okay. Everything in the script deals with this.
[01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:50.000]  The script tells you very clearly you are the only person on scene.
[01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:57.000]  Okay. No one else can tell you what to do in that situation at any given point
[01:04:57.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  because you're the only one present that knows the attitude of the individual you're encountering.
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:12.000]  Okay. You are the only one, therefore, that can decide the level of risk that you feel comfortable taking in such a situation.
[01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  Okay. Now, if it were me and I was fairly certain that he was not going to be shooting at me through the window,
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:28.000]  which most departments have a policy that forbids them to do that unless you're actually trying to run the cop down,
[01:05:28.000 --> 01:05:33.000]  they may break the window, but at least they're not going to shoot into it.
[01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  If they break the window and you've done nothing that they can actually have any lawful authority to accost you over,
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  much less assault you and damage your property,
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:48.000]  that just increases the charges and the lawsuit that you can claim against them if you pursue that route.
[01:05:48.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  If you have no desire to do that, then you can, of course, choose to stay within the car and let them do it
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  or get out of the car and prevent them from doing it and then just not sue them either way.
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  That's up to you.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:03.000]  Okay.
[01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:08.000]  But you have to choose. You're the only one that can.
[01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:10.000]  Alrighty. Man, thanks a lot.
[01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  You're very welcome. Hope it helps.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:14.000]  All right, man.
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:17.000]  All right. Thanks for calling in.
[01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:21.000]  All right, folks, now we're going to go to Scott in Wisconsin.
[01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  Scott, what can we do for you?
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:28.000]  It's Mark.
[01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:30.000]  Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm misreading this.
[01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  Mark, I'm sorry. It is Mark and I'm looking at the wrong line.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:35.000]  What can I do for you?
[01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  Well, I have a question about recording officers,
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  notably some jurisdictions like California is a two-party recording state.
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:53.000]  Not in a public arena if it's a public official in the performance of their public duties.
[01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:59.000]  The United States Supreme Court put down every state law in every state of the union that tries to make that the case.
[01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:07.000]  The wiretapping law is what you're referring to, and that implies in any state a two-party state.
[01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  If it's a private conversation in a non-public venue where the people have an expectation of privacy,
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:22.000]  which the Supreme Court says is not the case when the public is recording their public servants in the performance of their public duties,
[01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:27.000]  and especially so when it's in a public place.
[01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:34.000]  All right. Then if you rigged up your vehicle...
[01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:35.000]  Your what?
[01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:38.000]  With your car, your transportation...
[01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  Your what?
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  Car is good. Transportation is not. Vehicle is not.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  All right. Well, Wisconsin has a different set of rules on that, and so we can't do what you do in Texas.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:58.000]  This is why you have people calling from Wisconsin get started talking to you and then they disappear.
[01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:05.000]  Because once they find out how Wisconsin law is written, what you're doing doesn't work here.
[01:08:05.000 --> 01:08:08.000]  I'm willing to bet it works better than you might think.
[01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  But anyway, let's get on with your question and see what happens.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  All right. So if you have a recording set up in your property and you lose control of your property
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  because you are taken away from it or it is taken away from you, the wiretap laws, at least like in Wisconsin,
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  as long as you're in control or near the recording devices, it isn't wiretapping.
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:49.000]  So what happens if your recording devices in your vehicle or your transportation become separated from you?
[01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  Do they suddenly become illegal?
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:57.000]  That's what you would have to check the case law on or start some case law of your own to find out.
[01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  If there's not a court ruling distinguishing those differences, then it can be interpreted in favor of either party.
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  Hey, I was in a public venue when I began this.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:16.000]  You physically assaulted me and separated me from my property unlawfully, and I had no opportunity to turn it off.
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  Is that a viable affirmative defense?
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  I don't know unless you've got case law that says it is.
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:25.000]  I don't know either.
[01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:35.000]  I am aware of some case law that if you happen to be recording an illegal activity,
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:44.000]  times in which it might be illegal for you to record the illegal activity seem to suddenly become okay.
[01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:49.000]  Yeah, unless you're actually a member of the state that was doing it illegally.
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  Right. So I was calling for a bit of clarification on that.
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  Yeah, that's going to be determined by whatever the court opinions in your state have said it is,
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:04.000]  or if there's a United States court opinion that would overrule what your state said,
[01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:08.000]  whether it be an appellate court or the Supreme Court.
[01:10:08.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  But in order for it to be binding completely upon your state, that would have to be in your district.
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  Right. Well, and I haven't briefed that out yet.
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  All right, that's why I was calling.
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  Okay. Well, hopefully it was helpful, at least to get you pointed somewhere to look.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:28.000]  Well, it gives me some ideas.
[01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  Okay. Well, good luck.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:30.000]  Thank you, sir.
[01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  You're welcome.
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:32.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:33.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  All right, folks, call in numbers 512-646-1984.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  I got another 45 minutes in this show, and right now we're going to talk to Truth Raider.
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  Raider, what can I do for you?
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  Good evening, movie star.
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  I wouldn't go that far, but good evening.
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  Well, you're well on your way at your cameo appearance.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:57.000]  Well, we'll see how that goes, too.
[01:10:57.000 --> 01:11:02.000]  Yeah, it might lead you to some greener pastures, get better exposure.
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  Well, you know what the problem with pastures is, right?
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:07.000]  There's always something else to step in.
[01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  Uh-oh.
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:13.000]  Okay, well, I'm just chiming in for, you know, just a couple minutes here.
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:17.000]  I don't have too many questions or maybe not even hardly any questions about this,
[01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:19.000]  but anyway, did you get my email?
[01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:25.000]  Well, considering the deluge of emails I've had in the past two weeks, I really can't say.
[01:11:25.000 --> 01:11:28.000]  I'm still weeding through emails.
[01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  I sent it twice.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:32.000]  Yeah, well, my computer has been acting up again,
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:38.000]  and I have been having major issues trying to get it up and running enough to even have it stable to run the show,
[01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  which luckily I've got enough of going tonight that I was able to do so.
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  But I haven't spent a lot of time doing email.
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  I've been writing my articles offline because I can't keep the computer stable enough to stay online with it.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  So here we are.
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  Yeah.
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:11:55.000]  But I'll have to check and see.
[01:11:55.000 --> 01:11:57.000]  I don't know.
[01:11:57.000 --> 01:12:07.000]  Well, hopefully this movie will provide you better equipment and things going on with the classes and stuff will get you into some higher tech.
[01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:10.000]  Well, if this movie provides me with anything substantial at all,
[01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:16.000]  my happy butt's going to be on a beach somewhere doing this crap by satellite.
[01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:18.000]  Wouldn't that be nice?
[01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:19.000]  All right.
[01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:28.000]  I went to court on that July 27th, and what I did is both officers did show up.
[01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:38.000]  And I used the instruments that you gave me to use for court and let them speak for themselves.
[01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:44.000]  And I argued the not engaged in transportation argument.
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  Didn't I provide you, you're in Oregon or what?
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:49.000]  Yeah, Oregon.
[01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:50.000]  Okay.
[01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  Didn't I provide you enough information to research the Oregon statutes to make sure that everything up there is commercial, just like it is in Washington?
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:00.000]  It's written almost identical if memory serves.
[01:13:00.000 --> 01:13:01.000]  Correct.
[01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  Okay.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:05.000]  So it's not just a matter of not engaged in transportation.
[01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:11.000]  The statutes there specifically say it only applies to commercial activity.
[01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:13.000]  It doesn't apply to anything else.
[01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:14.000]  Correct.
[01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  Okay.
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  So you went to court and you got them talking about this and?
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  I cross-examined the officers.
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  Okay.
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:29.000]  All they could say is I don't recall or no to all my questions.
[01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:33.000]  Well, depending upon the question you asked, that either sucks or it's a good thing.
[01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:34.000]  Which one was it?
[01:13:34.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  No, it was a good thing.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:37.000]  Okay.
[01:13:37.000 --> 01:14:00.000]  Officer Walter, did you at any time discover on my personal or in my property a bill of lading, a commercial logbook, passenger cargo manifest, receipts or anything pertaining to a license registration and insurance proving that I'm engaged in transportation?
[01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  No.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:06.000]  Okay.
[01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:09.000]  Yeah, just the series over again.
[01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  At any time, did you discover anything that I was doing that had any relation to commercial activity whatsoever?
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:22.000]  No.
[01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  But here's the thing.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:33.000]  They didn't say, well, Your Honor, we're not here making accusations of Mr. Bear's being engaged in transportation or commerce.
[01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:35.000]  They didn't do that.
[01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:37.000]  So I couldn't catch them there, so I wouldn't get it.
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:38.000]  Well, but that's just it.
[01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  They didn't deny that's what they were having to do either.
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  Right.
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:49.000]  Well, at the end of the thing, I read the steps to challenge.
[01:14:49.000 --> 01:15:03.000]  You know, I won't repeat it right here, but it says basically, in essence, it says an officer that has no authority to initiate a traffic stop on anything that is not part of being, unless it's a breach of peace,
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:08.000]  plus anything to do with felonies or misdemeanors or any type of criminal act or any accusation or a warrant.
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  Yeah.
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  Well, see, the thing is, you went to the not in transportation argument, okay, which is fine.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:14.000]  Right.
[01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  But in Oregon, these are civil infractions, which I showed you all the information about, right?
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:20.000]  Correct.
[01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:24.000]  Why then did you even have to go to the transportation argument?
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:28.000]  Well, part of it, I said commercial.
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:29.000]  Okay.
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:29.000]  Well, either way.
[01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  Or here, because you charged me with commercial offenses.
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:32.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:15:32.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  No, you're making a statement when you say that.
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  That's shifting the burden of proof to you.
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:41.000]  You don't ask questions that way.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  That'll get your butt kicked.
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  Okay?
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:52.000]  The only thing you had to ask, because these are civil infractions, is the seven interrogatories that are on my blog.
[01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  What to do if your republic has these cases as civil infractions?
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  You're given very seven specific interrogatories.
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  There is no way they could have gotten a win, if they got a win, I don't know.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:16.000]  You haven't got that far yet, had you asked those seven interrogatories to that cop on the stand.
[01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:19.000]  There is no way.
[01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  Because all you'd have done in addition to what those seven interrogatories say is, did you initiate a stop without a warrant?
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:27.000]  Yes.
[01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  Did you witness any actual criminal activity prior to initiating this stop?
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:37.000]  Well, you were in violation of objection, non-responsive.
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  Did you see anything that is defined in the laws of Oregon as a crime?
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  And then you would have hit them up when they said no, with those seven interrogatories, and that have been hosed.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  Hang on just a second.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:55.000]  We'll be right back after this break, and we'll continue this on.
[01:16:55.000 --> 01:17:02.000]  Folks, we'll be right back, so stay where you're at.
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:18:02.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:26.000]  Order now.
[01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:28.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:28.000 --> 01:19:31.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking with Truth Raider.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:44.000]  All right, Raider, anyway, what I was saying is, once you get them set up on that, that they'd witnessed no actual crime before they initiated that stop without a warrant, that's an illegal seizure.
[01:19:44.000 --> 01:19:46.000]  They had no probable cause.
[01:19:46.000 --> 01:19:53.000]  They had no articulable, reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
[01:19:53.000 --> 01:20:00.000]  Those are the criteria for making a seizure, warrantless or otherwise.
[01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:05.000]  To get the warrant, they would have to have probable cause of criminal activity.
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  To initiate an investigation, they would have to have articulable facts establishing reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:14.000]  You get it?
[01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:22.000]  They can't even get to whether or not you're in transportation until they can justify the stop.
[01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  Correct, and that's pretty much in the sense of words, that's what I said.
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:34.000]  How is, was I in commercial activity saying that?
[01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:44.000]  Well, that's what, because what you're saying is, let me get this straight, transportation and commercial activities.
[01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:47.000]  Why are you talking about transportation?
[01:20:47.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  Why are you talking about commercial activities?
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:52.000]  What did I just finish saying?
[01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  Criminal activity.
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:56.000]  Correct.
[01:20:56.000 --> 01:20:57.000]  Okay.
[01:20:57.000 --> 01:20:59.000]  They don't allege criminal activity.
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:01.000]  I'm well aware of that.
[01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  Are you not listening to anything I'm saying here?
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  Yes, I am.
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:19.000]  Okay, in order to initiate a warrantless seizure, they must have probable cause or articulable suspicion of criminal activity.
[01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  Criminal, key word here, not commerce, not transportation, criminal.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:30.000]  Without that, nothing else matters.
[01:21:30.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  That makes the initial stop illegal all by itself.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:36.000]  That's what I read in court.
[01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:41.000]  That's exactly what I read in court off of the Steps to Challenge script that you sent me several months ago.
[01:21:41.000 --> 01:21:43.000]  Okay, then bring that up first.
[01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  Why then, after that, did you go to anything else?
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  Because I know for a fact I didn't tell you to do both of them together.
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:54.000]  No.
[01:21:54.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  Then why did you?
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:16.000]  I asserted because the basis for the officers to say that they're citing me and finding me guilty or alleging or being the witness and making a charge of a civil infraction, the commercial aspect has relevance.
[01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  No, it does not.
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:29.000]  How would they have gotten any evidence to use against you if the way they got the evidence was illegal?
[01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  Well, that's true.
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  No kidding, that's true.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:34.000]  Yeah.
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  They had no authority to initiate the stop, period, period.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  There is nothing else to discuss here.
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  What was your lawful authority to initiate a seizure of my person and my property without a warrant when you saw no crime being committed?
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:01.000]  That's what I read in the script.
[01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  Yeah, but then you blew that out of the water by going to something else.
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:21.000]  Something else that is completely irrelevant if the initial seizure was illegal.
[01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:28.000]  I was mixed in along with after reading that whole script and that part of it came in.
[01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  Okay, now wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:36.000]  Now we've already established that the instructions I gave you did not mix them, right?
[01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  Correct.
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:45.000]  So what we are getting to the point of here is that you chose to mix them, right?
[01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:48.000]  I chose to insert that, yes, as well.
[01:23:48.000 --> 01:23:49.000]  Okay.
[01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:55.000]  Take your right hand, flatten it in front of your face, and smack yourself really good in the forehead.
[01:23:55.000 --> 01:23:56.000]  Okay?
[01:23:56.000 --> 01:23:57.000]  I've done that about a thousand times.
[01:23:57.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  Because once again, you are not following the damned instructions.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:08.000]  Why do people do that?
[01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:09.000]  I don't know.
[01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  Okay?
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:11.000]  I think I did pretty good though.
[01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:18.000]  This is not a Hollywood movie where you can ad-lib a star-making portion of the film.
[01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:19.000]  Okay?
[01:24:19.000 --> 01:24:24.000]  I give out these steps the way I give them for a very specific reason.
[01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:29.000]  When you go off script, now you know why.
[01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:31.000]  Let me finish this real quick here.
[01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  Did you get convicted or not?
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  After about an hour of not knowing what they were going to do, then she sat there for a moment and then neglected...
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  She who?
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:47.000] ...that evidence, the judge, any evidence, and then paused and then said,
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  well, I'm going to go ahead and find you guilty of driving on a suspended license.
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  Now let me ask you a question.
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  How could she have even gotten to the issue of finding you guilty of driving if you had never brought it up?
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  If the only thing you challenged was complete jurisdiction because they had no lawful authority to make the stop.
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  Had you stuck to that argument and that argument alone...
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:16.000]  Now, did you get a jury in this matter?
[01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:17.000]  No.
[01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  Okay.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:22.000]  So this was a completely administrative hearing then, right off the bat.
[01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:25.000]  Was there a prosecuting attorney or did the cop do it?
[01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  No, the two police officers were the witnesses.
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  I didn't ask that.
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  Who prosecuted?
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:35.000]  I guess it was the judge.
[01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  No, again, how many people were present, just the four of you, the two cops, the judge, and you?
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:46.000]  And the court clerk sat there as a witness, I don't know, taking notes or whatever.
[01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  Anybody else speaking on behalf of the state or anyone else for the charges?
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:53.000]  No.
[01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  Okay.
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:25:57.000]  Then we have a serious problem here, wouldn't you think?
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:25:58.000]  Yes.
[01:25:58.000 --> 01:25:59.000]  Okay.
[01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  You're being denied a jury trial for a civil infraction that no one had the lawful authority to initiate a seizure for,
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  and an administrative judge that is producing a decision of guilty with no facts or evidence.
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:20.000]  And you don't – what are you doing about this?
[01:26:20.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  I sat there in dismay for a moment.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:28.000]  I said, this is a collusion, judicial incompetence.
[01:26:28.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  Therefore, I shall file for or move to disqualify the judge.
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:36.000]  You've already been found guilty.
[01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  How are you going to disqualify them now?
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  She reserved all my objections for an appeal.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  That's the point is that she did.
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  Really?
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:50.000]  On what record?
[01:26:50.000 --> 01:27:00.000]  She looked at the – the only evidence that these officers had to go by was a printout from the Department of Motor Vehicles saying in January of this year.
[01:27:00.000 --> 01:27:01.000]  Okay.
[01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  All of which information – let me ask you another question, because I'm sure I'm going to be just regretting asking this.
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:17.000]  But if memory serves along with the instructions, I gave you specific instructions on filing a specific set of pleadings,
[01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  one of which was a motion to suppress, one of which was a motion challenging jurisdiction,
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:28.000]  and another one to dismiss because the initial arrest and seizure was unlawful.
[01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  Is that accurate?
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:31.000]  Correct.
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  Okay.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  Did you file them?
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  Yes, I did.
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  They are part of the record.
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:39.000]  They are part of the record.
[01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  But there is no actual record of the proceedings.
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:49.000]  There was no official court reporter or anybody recording the proceedings, right?
[01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:53.000]  I have to check on that, but there was a court clerk.
[01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  Okay.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:27:56.000]  Again, does not mean they were doing these other things.
[01:27:56.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  But yeah, you need to find out.
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:04.000]  And if there is an official recording of that, you need to be getting your hands on it and getting a transcription done of it.
[01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  Okay?
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:06.000]  Okay.
[01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:07.000]  Got it.
[01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  Folks, I'm going to say this one more time.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  If you call me for help and I give you a specific set of instructions on what to do in your case and you deviate from that, you're on your own.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:22.000]  Okay?
[01:28:22.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  You're on your own.
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  Because when you cut your own throat, there's not a damn thing in the world I can do to save you.
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  What is the point of calling the suicide hotline after you've stuck the shotgun in your mouth and pulled both triggers?
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:41.000]  Okay?
[01:28:41.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  It's not going to work.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:54.000]  If I give you instructions because of what I've read and put together from the particular state you're in and you don't follow them, you're on your own.
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  Raider, stop adding to the stuff I give you to do.
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  All right.
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:03.000]  If you have a question, you know how to get in touch with me to ask the question.
[01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:08.000]  Stick to asking me questions because I don't have time to peruse long-ass emails that really don't get to the point.
[01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:10.000]  Okay?
[01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  So you got something to ask, write it and ask it.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:15.000]  Don't beat around the bush with it.
[01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:16.000]  All right.
[01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  But at the same time, I give you instructions.
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:21.000]  Don't deviate from them.
[01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  All right.
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:23.000]  This is a good example of why.
[01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  All right.
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:29.000]  Now, file your damned appeal.
[01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  Okay.
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  I'm going to have to request an informal papyrus.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  Well, you need to request whatever information it is relating to what you have to do in order to perfect that appeal and get it done, whatever that may be.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:42.000]  I have to do that.
[01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  They're charging me $3,400.
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  Well, you do that.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  All right.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  But in the meantime, I'm going to drop you to go think about that because I've got other callers to finish and I'm getting to the last half hour of the show.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:54.000]  All right?
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  All right.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:29:56.000]  I got one more coming up August 16th.
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:29:57.000]  All right.
[01:29:57.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  Well, good luck.
[01:29:58.000 --> 01:29:59.000]  Stick to the instructions.
[01:29:59.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  All right, folks.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:01.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:04.000]  Sticky, icky chewing gum on the sole of your shoe.
[01:30:04.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  Tons of gum invades our environment every year and a lot winds up on our streets, our shoes and even our clothes.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and in a moment I'll tell you how one company plans to solve this sticky problem.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:23.000]  That's creepy.
[01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:28.000]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and they're third party certified.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:39.000]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:48.000]  Wads have used up chewing gum.
[01:30:48.000 --> 01:30:53.000]  Americans chuck 120,000 tons of them into the environment every year.
[01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:57.000]  They stick to our streets, squeeze onto shoes and cling to our clothes.
[01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:01.000]  And once these wads glom on, they're nearly impossible to remove.
[01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:06.000]  It's a sticky problem, but science is serving up a solution, an unsticky gum called Rev7.
[01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  Rev7 is the first easily removable gum.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:11.000]  It simply washes out with soap and water.
[01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:16.000]  It's also biodegradable and flavor testers say it tastes just as good as the sticky stuff.
[01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  Given that it's a synthetic plastic polymer like other commercial chewing gums, I doubt I'll be chewing the stuff myself.
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:25.000]  But I'm hoping those other gum chewers out there make the switch.
[01:31:25.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:32.000]  I lost my son.
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:33.000]  My nephew.
[01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:34.000]  My uncle.
[01:31:34.000 --> 01:31:35.000]  My son.
[01:31:35.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  On September 11, 2001.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:47.000]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  Bring justice to my son.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  My uncle.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  My nephew.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  My son.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  Go to buildingwat.org.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:18.000]  and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant?
[01:32:18.000 --> 01:32:24.000]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:32:24.000 --> 01:32:28.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:31.000]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:36.000]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand
[01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:49.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  Only at HempUSA.org.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:29.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:34.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  All right, now we are going to go and talk to Oliver in Tennessee.
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:40.000]  Oliver, what do you got?
[01:33:40.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  How you doing, Ed?
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  I'm doing all right, and you?
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:45.000]  Good, good.
[01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:47.000]  Just to say, I have a question.
[01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  How much does it cost to fund your show for a year?
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  For a year?
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  Yeah.
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  I don't know. You would have to call Deborah and ask her that because she runs the majority of the equipment and everything.
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:11.000]  Me, my cost is pretty much just keeping my equipment up and running and keeping myself clothed and fed.
[01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  That's my cost for the most part.
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:19.000]  But as far as the network itself, that is something you'd have to ask her because it's her network, not mine.
[01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  I'm just a co-host on it.
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  Okay. Well, I got these big lawsuits that y'all are helping me with and trying on donating some substantial.
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:38.000]  And this is very intriguing.
[01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:47.000]  To someone who can understand what's going on at the time it's going on, it's very funny.
[01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  It's beginning to become amazing to the distances that they'll go to do things.
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  Yeah.
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  I had to go to court for one of my driving situations.
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  I took off on a car because I woke up and I was not in the correct state to deal with it.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  I was going to be...
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:10.000]  Yeah, I remember the story on that.
[01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  Yeah. So I took off and now we're in court and I read the statute and it says in that law,
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  it says that it is a defense that the plaintiff...
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  Well, now they're the plaintiff. So are you suing them?
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:35.000]  No, no, the defendant.
[01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:36.000]  Okay.
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:46.000]  It's a defense for the defendant to flee from the cop if the cop is trying to arrest them unlawfully.
[01:35:46.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  So it's clearly stated in there.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  Yeah. Now all you've got to do is make sure you have an argument
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:57.000]  that will convince them that his attempt to arrest you was unlawful.
[01:35:57.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  Oh, yeah, because in the report, it was clearly health and safety, health and welfare check.
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  Right?
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  Yeah, it was clearly a health and welfare check. I know it.
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:16.000]  So I went to court and I'm going to court and the attorney called, the judge called me up.
[01:36:16.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  And the attorney, he's running his game.
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  Well, I didn't have a chance to speak to Mr. Olivier.
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:25.000]  We didn't have a chance to make any settlement offer.
[01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  And so I'm starting looking at him crazy because like, you should be used to me by now.
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  You know I don't play that role.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:36.000]  Everything goes to the jury box with 12 people in it.
[01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:38.000]  What are you talking about settlement or dismissal?
[01:36:38.000 --> 01:36:42.000]  I've been looking forward to that jury box and you haven't given it to me yet.
[01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  So why are you telling the judge that you don't view a settlement?
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:53.000]  You know I don't play settlement because I'm looking at him very crazy.
[01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:56.000]  And then the judge is, the judge, I'm familiar with the judge.
[01:36:56.000 --> 01:36:58.000]  The judge is very concerned.
[01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  He never see me come in there with a mean mug on my face.
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  The attorney was just raking my nerves because he said,
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  I'm writing all these lawsuits and understanding the formula of putting them in.
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  So as I'm doing them, I'm getting very passionate about my rights
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:20.000]  because it's so obvious once you start writing lawsuits.
[01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:24.000]  So I'm sitting here, I'm looking at him like, just crazy.
[01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  And then he says, oh well, they might press perjury charges.
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:35.000]  I said, perjury charges?
[01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  And then the prosecutor is sitting behind him, right?
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  Perjury charges.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  What are you talking about?
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:47.000]  They said, well you filed lawsuits against the government for property
[01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  in the paper where you're trying to pay the fees for later, file the fees for later.
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  He said that you didn't write the property in there,
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:02.000]  so they said that they might file perjury charges.
[01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  I looked at him and I said, bring it.
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  I said, they like to spend that money, don't they?
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:08.000]  Very loud.
[01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:14.000]  Everybody in the court room is just looking at me like, whoa, this guy is a tornado.
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  So I'm like, they like to spend that money, so they bring it.
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:20.000]  The judge is just staring at me like, okay.
[01:38:20.000 --> 01:38:23.000]  And he's like, well, I'm going to set, I'm not paying attention to the judge.
[01:38:23.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  He's like, I'm going to set the case for this day,
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:29.000]  and then we're going to have trial for this day.
[01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  I think that's the best situation for the four.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:36.000]  And then when I come to find out that, and he also said, well,
[01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  that might be the fact, but they're not going to be paying you in silver or in gold.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  They read my lawsuit.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:46.000]  Is that how it goes?
[01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:47.000]  Do they have it?
[01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  Everybody has read my lawsuit.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  If you filed it, yeah.
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  Once it's filed, it's public record.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:56.000]  Oh, so it's hot.
[01:38:56.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  Yeah.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  Now the question is, do they have any legitimate basis for using it against you in these cases?
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  Are they attempting to be prejudicial to you by introducing the issue of the lawsuit
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  when it is not directly relevant to the case currently before the court and this other court?
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  No, no, no, no.
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:17.000]  That's not what he's trying to do.
[01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:19.000]  He's trying to put it underneath the table.
[01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:22.000]  He's trying to give you a heads up that, hey, they might be trying to press charges.
[01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:23.000]  I blew it up.
[01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  I blew it up and like, bring it.
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:28.000]  I knew the prosecutor was sitting right behind us.
[01:39:28.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  I was like, bring it.
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  They like to spend that money.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  Because you bring that suit on me, I'm going to sue you again,
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  because he's not bright enough to realize that the spot that they give you to put your property
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  is not big enough to put two cars in.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:45.000]  Right.
[01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  I have a whole list of property in the suit, which is required by the rules.
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  So you want to try some frivolous, you know, concept?
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:01.000]  Or you want to come at me halfway?
[01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:03.000]  Well, it sounds more like they use this.
[01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:06.000]  They were trying to use this as an intimidation tactic.
[01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:10.000]  That itself is a due process violation.
[01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  Exactly.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  And the thing is, it's the wrong one.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  I made it clear.
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  You can see, to me, you've got to be insane to try to use the same concept against me.
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  How many times have I came up in this courtroom and walked all over you?
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  Well...
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  And you continue to hold the position like you actually have a...
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  Yeah, believe me, I can relate.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:36.000]  It's like some of these people that they'll cite these case sites that don't exist
[01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  or they're completely wrong or out of context,
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  and I'll post something saying, look, you've got it wrong.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:42.000]  Here is what it says.
[01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  Here's why it doesn't exist or it doesn't exist at all, and blah, blah, blah.
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  And they'll keep reposting it as if it's fact.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:52.000]  When I've already shown them 10 times, it's not.
[01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:53.000]  I feel you, brother.
[01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  Believe me.
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  They'll do stupid stuff like this over and over again if you let them.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:01.000]  Right.
[01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:07.000]  And to me, it's hilarious because now I'm learning about their insurance companies
[01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  and how to file against them and all that, but the suits are tying me up.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  There's one question about the suits.
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  When I'm suing the municipality, I've got all these defendants.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  It says that I can send the summons to the city attorney's office, correct?
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  They're city employees.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  Notice to principal is notice to agent.
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  Notice to agent is notice to principal.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  That's the rule.
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  So you can serve them at their place of work.
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  So does that mean I have to notify the city and the defendants?
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:44.000]  I've got to send them one?
[01:41:44.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  No, no, no, no.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:46.000]  No, no, no.
[01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:47.000]  That's what I'm saying.
[01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:51.000]  You can notice to agent is notice to principal.
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:53.000]  Notice to principal is notice to agent.
[01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  Okay.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:55.000]  I'm just making sure.
[01:41:55.000 --> 01:42:00.000]  You can serve all of them at their place of work.
[01:42:00.000 --> 01:42:03.000]  Which is city hall.
[01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:05.000]  It depends on what department.
[01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:09.000]  If they're police officers, I would serve the police department.
[01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:12.000]  If they're city employees like the mayor or the city secretary,
[01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  I would serve them at city hall, okay?
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  If they are working in some other separate department, you know,
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  like code enforcement, I would serve them at the director of code enforcement.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:26.000]  Okay.
[01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:30.000]  So if I'm still in the city of Clarkville,
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:34.000]  so that one has to go for the city of Clarkville?
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:36.000]  Then yeah, you serve city hall.
[01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:40.000]  You'd serve the city attorney at whatever address that is.
[01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  Okay.
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  Now, and this is also including the employees that caused the violation.
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:50.000]  Would I have to send out separate summonses?
[01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:55.000]  You need to check the rules of civil procedure up there in Tennessee for that.
[01:42:55.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  But again, if you put into the notice that notice to agent is notice to principal,
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:03.000]  notice to principal is notice to agent, blah, blah, blah, you might be covered.
[01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:08.000]  But you need to specifically follow whatever the rules in the state is for civil procedure.
[01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:13.000]  If you're filing this in the federal against them, check the federal rules of procedure.
[01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  Okay.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  So okay, that means go over civil, I went over it.
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:19.000]  But if there's nothing that they could use me...
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  Service of process or notice.
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  That's what you need to be looking up in the rules.
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  Service of process or service of a complaint or anything of that.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  They may have them all under lumped in one area or they may have them under different areas.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  But make sure you check before you do anything.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:40.000]  Okay.
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:47.000]  I can't specifically tell you what you have to do because I don't know what the exact rules are in your state for service.
[01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  That's what you need to find out.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  All right.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:51.000]  Hang on a second.
[01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  We'll be right back and pick this up.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:53.000]  Okay.
[01:43:53.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  All right.
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:43:55.000]  All right, folks.
[01:43:55.000 --> 01:43:56.000]  Rule of law radio.
[01:43:56.000 --> 01:43:57.000]  Last segment.
[01:43:57.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:44:15.000 --> 01:44:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:44:21.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:27.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:44:27.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:34.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:41.000 --> 01:44:50.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:50.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:26.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  Now we're going to finish up with, I'm sorry, it's Olivier is what you're saying, right?
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:34.000]  Okay, not Oliver, Olivier.
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  All right, I'll get it right from now on.
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:38.000]  All right, let me quit.
[01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:41.000]  All right, so I understand that because I've seen that section.
[01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  So if there's nothing in there that gives them any power, I'm safe.
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:48.000]  Just follow those rules and I'm safe.
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  All right.
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:50.000]  Absolutely.
[01:46:50.000 --> 01:46:53.000]  Okay, got that.
[01:46:53.000 --> 01:47:06.000]  As far as the, I'm going to ask you, I lost one of my, it's just information I'm relating to.
[01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  Things are changing.
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:12.000]  One of my videos that I had for a lawsuit was damaged.
[01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:17.000]  So I called the police station and was going to go down and file a paperwork.
[01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:21.000]  And they were like, oh, well, Mr. Olivier, you can't come down here and file paperwork.
[01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:22.000]  You can't file for the video.
[01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:24.000]  I'm like, what do you mean I can't file for the video?
[01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:29.000]  They're like, well, we got an email last week saying that we can't do that anymore.
[01:47:29.000 --> 01:47:30.000]  There's a new process.
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:32.000]  And then I said, new process?
[01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:34.000]  You know, I started boiling up inside.
[01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:40.000]  I'm like, listen, y'all better not be messing with me because I'm going to go all the way with this.
[01:47:40.000 --> 01:47:43.000]  And I want my video, what you mean, new process?
[01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:48.000]  Y'all don't know what happened, but we got an email last week and this is, they said call City Hall.
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:50.000]  Call City Hall and get them to explain to you.
[01:47:50.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  I don't know what to say, Mr. Olivier.
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:47:53.000]  I said, okay.
[01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:54.000]  Sorry.
[01:47:54.000 --> 01:47:55.000]  Let me calm down.
[01:47:55.000 --> 01:47:56.000]  We'll call City Hall.
[01:47:56.000 --> 01:47:57.000]  Call City Hall.
[01:47:57.000 --> 01:47:58.000]  I'm like, hey, I'm trying to get a video.
[01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:00.000]  This has been a process the whole time.
[01:48:00.000 --> 01:48:04.000]  Now they're telling me all of a sudden that they switched the process.
[01:48:04.000 --> 01:48:08.000]  I want to know when this was enacted.
[01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:10.000]  How was it supposed to be enacted?
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:12.000]  Who gave you authority to do it?
[01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:15.000]  And then they're familiar with me.
[01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:17.000]  This is the mayor's assistant.
[01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:19.000]  She said, wait, wait, Mr. Olivier, Mr. Olivier.
[01:48:19.000 --> 01:48:22.000]  Sorry, Mr. Olivier, but there's been an issue.
[01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  We have a lot of departments in the city and it has been brought to our awareness that we've been doing a lot of things incorrectly.
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:40.000]  And that is one of the things that we've been doing incorrectly or the department has been doing it incorrectly.
[01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  And that is one of the processes that we're trying to get correct now, Mr. Olivier.
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:51.000]  This has just been brought to our attention and she gave me the whole spill.
[01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:56.000]  And in my head, I'm like, wait a minute, you're the mayor's secretary.
[01:48:56.000 --> 01:49:04.000]  I wrote that lawsuit so good that y'all had a meeting about this and y'all trying to clean this up.
[01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  I wrote it because I was attacking their policies and everything.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:09.000]  I wrote it in that framework.
[01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:15.000]  So a week after a lawsuit come in, sheriffs are coming down in my neighborhood.
[01:49:15.000 --> 01:49:16.000]  They're not bothering me.
[01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:20.000]  It's like they're coming to see who's the big guy in town or something.
[01:49:20.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  They wave and they go about their business.
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:24.000]  They don't come bothering me with nothing.
[01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  Now that I go up another street, they don't bother me with nothing.
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  But I think there's something going on.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:34.000]  That lawsuit is making a lot of things switch.
[01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  Cops are pointing at other cops as I pass by.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:42.000]  I caught one cop grabbing the other cop to show him what I look like.
[01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:44.000]  Like there goes Olivier right there in that car.
[01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:45.000]  Yeah.
[01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:50.000]  Now, just an FYI, I know it's too late in this particular instance for this particular video.
[01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  Always make backups, man.
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:56.000]  Once you get an original in your hands, make multiple backups right away.
[01:49:56.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  Right.
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:49:59.000]  This is exactly why.
[01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:04.000]  Make any of them for any reason in any way, but make multiple backups.
[01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:05.000]  Okay.
[01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  And then you can edit one of your copies if that's necessary.
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:14.000]  But don't ever touch your original and don't ever touch your backup copies of the original.
[01:50:14.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  All right.
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:21.000]  Yeah, I pretty much got these locked up and pretty much it's because of your help.
[01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:26.000]  So as soon as I get this squared away, I'm going to come down and see you all to show you our appreciation.
[01:50:26.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  And so we can continue to go on.
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  Well, I appreciate that.
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:34.000]  And I'm glad we're actually being a good service to you.
[01:50:34.000 --> 01:50:35.000]  We certainly try.
[01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:38.000]  We don't try to do anything half-assed, so to speak.
[01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  We try to make sure we do it right.
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:41.000]  Right.
[01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:42.000]  So I just want to know.
[01:50:42.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  I'm going to give you our appreciation.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:46.000]  I'm going to get off to see if you can get somebody else in right quick.
[01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:47.000]  All right.
[01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:48.000]  Thank you.
[01:50:48.000 --> 01:50:49.000]  All right.
[01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:50.000]  All right.
[01:50:50.000 --> 01:50:51.000]  All right.
[01:50:51.000 --> 01:50:55.000]  Now let's get on with Mark in Florida.
[01:50:55.000 --> 01:50:57.000]  Mark, what can we do for you?
[01:50:57.000 --> 01:50:58.000]  Oh, sorry.
[01:50:58.000 --> 01:50:59.000]  Wrong one.
[01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  My screen keeps changing.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:01.000]  There's Mark in Florida.
[01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  All right.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:03.000]  Go ahead.
[01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  I got a little bit of good news for you.
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:08.000]  I ordered your course an hour or two ago.
[01:51:08.000 --> 01:51:09.000]  Well, all right.
[01:51:09.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  Cool beans.
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:13.000]  So you get to eat supper today.
[01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:14.000]  All right.
[01:51:14.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  Cool.
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:16.000]  I like it when I can eat supper.
[01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:21.000]  That'll just about – my share of that should just about cover the cost of the pizza I had to get today.
[01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:23.000]  There you go.
[01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:25.000]  With me, all I eat is supper.
[01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:27.000]  The other two meals get skipped.
[01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  But anyway, I got some more good news.
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  All right.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:35.000]  A victim a couple days ago of an armed robbery.
[01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:36.000]  You were?
[01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:38.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:42.000]  Was the robber wearing a uniform and a badge?
[01:51:42.000 --> 01:51:47.000]  Yeah, he was wearing one of the green uniforms, had one of them cars with flashing lights on top.
[01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:48.000]  Yeah, okay.
[01:51:48.000 --> 01:52:01.000]  And he parked in the number two lane, which this is a four lane intersection, one left turn, one right turn, and two straight lanes.
[01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  So he was on the left straight lane and just decided to park his car and leave it there and jump out screaming at me.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:19.000]  I rate, asking me if I wanted to go to jail because I was walking in the grass with my sign.
[01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:26.000]  And I proceeded to explain that, well, sir, I'm just exercising my right to free speech.
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:30.000]  And he argued at that point, and I rebutted a little bit.
[01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:35.000]  And the bottom line was I finally said, look, I'm not going to stand here and argue this, sir.
[01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:41.000]  If he wants to file out the proper legal documents, you do that, and we'll settle this in court.
[01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:44.000]  How did he react to that?
[01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  Ooh, how do you think?
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:55.000]  There was already smoke coming out of his ears, and now there was lightning bolts coming out of his eyes.
[01:52:55.000 --> 01:53:05.000]  At the same time, he knew he was up against something that he wasn't winning.
[01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  And he was trying to figure out a way to win, and the wheels were turning, and he wasn't coming up with anything.
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:21.000]  And I knew that I was a definite danger at that point of physical harm.
[01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:25.000]  I stood firmly. I stood very firmly.
[01:53:25.000 --> 01:53:37.000]  And he finally said, well, give me that, and he grabs the sign out of my hand, starts to tear it up in little pieces.
[01:53:37.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  What was on this sign, by the way?
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:46.000]  Homeless.
[01:53:46.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  So he got in his car, then he backed up and parked in the grass.
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  So I walked over and tapped on his window, said, may I ask what you're doing, sir?
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:01.000]  He said, you can ask.
[01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:03.000]  I said, is there an answer to that?
[01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:05.000]  He said, I'm doing my job.
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:07.000]  And I said, and what is your job?
[01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:11.000]  He said, to keep you from panhandling.
[01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:17.000]  He said earlier that I was violating the city ordinance.
[01:54:17.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  I said, what specific city ordinance are you referring to?
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:24.000]  And he said, look up this city, this city, and this city.
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  I said, well, he said, what city are you in?
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:33.000]  And I had to bite my tongue to keep him laughing.
[01:54:33.000 --> 01:54:37.000]  This guy doesn't even know where he is.
[01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:39.000]  And I threw it right back on him.
[01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:42.000]  You know, well, you tell me you're the one making the claim.
[01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:46.000]  Which city ordinance am I violating?
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:50.000]  But the good thing about it, I've got a new system.
[01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:57.000]  Remember, last time I talked to you, I was asking about ways to record and get this all,
[01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:03.000]  get myself protected so I'm recording long before any intrusion.
[01:55:03.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  Right.
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:13.000]  I've bought a few devices, and I bought a DB power pack to charge these things back up.
[01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:16.000]  And as it works, I'm only having to use two of the devices,
[01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:24.000]  but I am constantly audio-video recording the whole time I'm walking.
[01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:28.000]  So that way, when they come up and lecture me about being in the grass,
[01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:30.000]  and then when they write up the complaint under oath,
[01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:34.000]  they say I was out there and cars were swerving and hitting their brakes and honking their horns
[01:55:34.000 --> 01:55:36.000]  and all these lies they put down.
[01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  Right.
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  Then I've got it all on tape that that didn't happen.
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  But I had this deputy all on tape, too.
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:52.000]  And I dialed 911 while he was still sitting in his car.
[01:55:52.000 --> 01:55:56.000]  While I'm talking to 911, he left.
[01:55:56.000 --> 01:56:01.000]  His sergeant ended up calling me, and he took the report,
[01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:03.000]  and I told him I wanted to file a criminal complaint.
[01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:06.000]  This guy has stolen property from me.
[01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:10.000]  Not only stolen, but destroyed private property.
[01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:11.000]  Yeah.
[01:56:11.000 --> 01:56:14.000]  While prominently displaying a weapon.
[01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:17.000]  I said it is petty theft, but it is theft.
[01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:19.000]  And I wasn't even thinking about the gun.
[01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:22.000]  It was an armed robbery.
[01:56:22.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  True.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:25.000]  That's true.
[01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:27.000]  Okay.
[01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:29.000]  So he said, well, you're allowed to do that.
[01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:32.000]  And then he quickly got off the phone.
[01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  Now, just the day before, I hadn't arranged it.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:37.000]  Now, in that relation, when he said you're allowed to do that,
[01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:41.000]  is he talking about filing the complaint or to do what you were doing?
[01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:43.000]  Filing the complaint.
[01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:46.000]  Okay.
[01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:52.000]  We discussed, or I stated to him, you know, I said,
[01:56:52.000 --> 01:56:56.000]  I'm sure you well know that there can be no laws against panhandling
[01:56:56.000 --> 01:57:01.000]  because the Supreme Court has held its freedom of speech for 60 years.
[01:57:01.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  Every time some city tries to make a law against it, it gets knocked down.
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:11.000]  And he didn't argue that point.
[01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  Yeah, and they're not committing any unlawful act to ask for a charitable donation.
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:20.000]  Therefore, it is a legal occupation of common right.
[01:57:20.000 --> 01:57:21.000]  Right.
[01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:26.000]  And as long as you're not a corporate entity, you do not need a license.
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:27.000]  Right.
[01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  See, that's where they try to get you to get a permit or something like that.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:38.000]  What they arrest me for on all these other charges is they say I'm out there obstructing traffic,
[01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:40.000]  which is all a lie.
[01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:43.000]  Never happens, you know.
[01:57:43.000 --> 01:57:49.000]  You can look on Google Satellite View and see me and see the path that I walk in the grass.
[01:57:49.000 --> 01:57:51.000]  Yeah.
[01:57:51.000 --> 01:57:54.000]  Or Google Street View.
[01:57:54.000 --> 01:57:55.000]  All right.
[01:57:55.000 --> 01:57:58.000]  Well, I'm glad you got something to protect yourself in the form of that recording.
[01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:00.000]  And hopefully you'll get something good out of this
[01:58:00.000 --> 01:58:06.000]  because it sounds like you've already got something you can sue over here fairly easy.
[01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  Oh, I've got tons.
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:08.000]  All right.
[01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  Well, I wish you luck with it.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  The state attorney refused to let me file a document with him the day before.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  I called 911 on him.
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  Yeah, well, that's a good thing.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  All right, Mark, I hate to cut you off, but I've got to get out of here now.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:22.000]  I'm out of time.
[01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  Have a great week, and God bless you on this, sir.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  All right, Don and Adam, I'm sorry I'm not going to get to you before the end of the show.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  If you have a question you need something answered, please send me an email,
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:37.000]  Eddie, E-D-D-I-E, at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:40.000]  All right, folks, I want to thank you all for listening.
[01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:44.000]  Please keep us in your financial prayers and financial support whenever you can.
[01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:47.000]  That's what keeps us here and keeps us working for you.
[01:58:47.000 --> 01:58:51.000]  Have a great week, good night, and God bless.
[01:58:51.000 --> 01:58:56.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible
[01:58:56.000 --> 01:58:59.000]  called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:59.000 --> 01:59:02.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes
[01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:05.000]  that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:05.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:12.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:12.000 --> 01:59:21.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:26.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:36.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:36.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.000 --> 01:59:54.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it!
[01:59:54.000 --> 02:00:11.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com