[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:18.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:18.000 --> 00:24.000]  Markets for Wednesday, the 27th of July, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,327.05
[00:24.000 --> 00:29.000]  an ounce, silver $19.95 an ounce, Texas crude $42.92 an ounce.
[00:29.000 --> 00:41.000]  And Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 658 U.S. currency.
[00:41.000 --> 00:46.000]  Today in history, the year 1929, the Geneva Convention dealing with the treatment of prisoners
[00:46.000 --> 00:48.000]  of war is signed by 53 nations.
[00:48.000 --> 00:52.000]  Its provisions dealt mostly with the capture and captivity of prisoners of war and the
[00:52.000 --> 00:55.000]  classification and treatment of civilians during war.
[00:55.000 --> 01:03.000]  The 1929 Geneva Convention agreement was signed today in history.
[01:03.000 --> 01:09.000]  In recent news, Julian Assange via his anonymous whistleblower site, WikiLeaks, released 20,000
[01:09.000 --> 01:13.000]  hacked emails from the Democratic National Convention on Friday, July 22, days before
[01:13.000 --> 01:17.000]  the commencement of the convention on Monday, allowing it to be disseminated and read over
[01:17.000 --> 01:18.000]  the weekend.
[01:18.000 --> 01:21.000]  The emails were so embarrassingly damning that they resulted in Debbie Schultz, the
[01:21.000 --> 01:26.000]  chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, resigning on Sunday, a day before the opening
[01:26.000 --> 01:27.000]  ceremonies.
[01:27.000 --> 01:30.000]  Amongst the litany of embarrassing emails leaked by WikiLeaks, there were emails from
[01:30.000 --> 01:36.000]  January 2015 to May 2016 where DNC staff essentially preselected Hillary for the nomination
[01:36.000 --> 01:41.000]  discussing how to deal with Bernie Sanders in order to ensure Clinton's nomination long
[01:41.000 --> 01:42.000]  before any votes had been cast.
[01:42.000 --> 01:47.000]  The bulk of released emails come from seven prominent DNC staff members, Senior Advisor
[01:47.000 --> 01:52.000]  Andrew Wright, National Finance Director Jordan Kaplan, Finance Chief of Staff Scott
[01:52.000 --> 01:56.000]  Comer, Northern California Finance Director Robert Stowe, Finance Director of Data and
[01:56.000 --> 02:01.000]  Strategic Initiatives Daniel Parrish, Finance Director Alan Zachary, and Miranda.
[02:01.000 --> 02:05.000]  Amongst the emails was one dated May 5 where the Chief Financial Officer of the Democratic
[02:05.000 --> 02:09.000]  National Committee, Brad Marshall, suggested attacking Sanders over his Jewish heritage,
[02:09.000 --> 02:12.000]  contrasted to his atheistic tendencies.
[02:12.000 --> 02:16.000]  This WikiLeak release comes weeks after hacker Guccifer 2.0 had released several internal
[02:16.000 --> 02:21.000]  memos showing that the DNC staff were strategizing to make Clinton the presidential nominee as
[02:21.000 --> 02:23.000]  early as March 2015.
[02:23.000 --> 02:28.000]  This release was followed by a class action lawsuit against Debbie Schultz and the DNC
[02:28.000 --> 02:31.000]  in June by Florida-based law firm Beck and Lee.
[02:31.000 --> 02:36.000]  If this wasn't enough, an email dated May 6 from the DNC digital office and Obama campaign
[02:36.000 --> 02:41.000]  veteran Rebecca Christopher read, quote, attached to the script for a new video we'd like to
[02:41.000 --> 02:45.000]  use to mop up some of the more taco bowl engagement and demonstrate that Trump actually
[02:45.000 --> 02:46.000]  isn't trying.
[02:46.000 --> 02:51.000]  It is yet unclear whether she was referring to Donald Trump's Cinco de Mayo tweet or to
[02:51.000 --> 02:54.000]  the Hispanic voting constituents as the Taco Bell engagement.
[02:54.000 --> 03:22.000]  This was Brook Roadie with your Lowdown for July 27, 2016.
[03:22.000 --> 03:33.000]  Let's see.
[03:33.000 --> 03:39.000]  Yeah, they didn't get too far
[03:39.000 --> 03:43.000]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day's slum
[03:43.000 --> 03:47.000]  A man had to answer for the weed that he'd done
[03:47.000 --> 03:51.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree
[03:51.000 --> 03:57.000]  Round up all of them bad boys and hang them high up the street
[03:57.000 --> 04:01.000]  For all the people to see
[04:01.000 --> 04:05.000]  That's just the one thing you should always find
[04:05.000 --> 04:09.000]  You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line
[04:09.000 --> 04:13.000]  And if guns won't settle us, we'll sing a victory tune
[04:13.000 --> 04:17.000]  And we'll all meet back at the local zoo
[04:17.000 --> 04:22.000]  We'll raise up our glasses again, stable forces singing
[04:22.000 --> 04:32.000]  Let's get for my men, bear for my horses
[04:52.000 --> 05:00.000]  I see that every once in a while to kind of like vege out a little bit when I've been burning the candle at both ends, so to speak, and sometimes in the middle
[05:00.000 --> 05:05.000]  I don't get to play it very often, especially since they goofed everything up on this, but still
[05:05.000 --> 05:07.000]  It's going to be an interesting week
[05:07.000 --> 05:13.000]  It seems over this past weekend I've managed to pick up a couple of trolls on Facebook and in email
[05:13.000 --> 05:21.000]  That are proclaiming themselves to be constitutional attorneys and that all of my information is somehow incorrect
[05:21.000 --> 05:34.000]  Now, one thing I can say for certain about these so-called constitutional attorneys is that they have not done the research that I have done on the specific laws for the state of Texas
[05:34.000 --> 05:43.000]  Now, one of these guys is claiming that I'm using research he did and they did 45 years ago, but I've never heard of the gentleman
[05:43.000 --> 05:57.000]  And to the best of my knowledge, the research that I have, while I have read many different discussions on it that have given me ideas on where to go find something, my research is my own
[05:57.000 --> 06:04.000]  My research came from learning to read and dissect these statutes in the case law myself
[06:04.000 --> 06:11.000]  I didn't have to pay $100,000 to teach me to, someone to teach me to do it wrong, like these guys did
[06:11.000 --> 06:27.000]  And the reason I say to teach them to do it wrong is because the one analytical tool that none of these people in the legal profession or that are sitting in control of our courts have ever done
[06:27.000 --> 06:34.000]  And not even with the original Supreme Court, you can tell that in the opinions they wrote, that this is absolutely true
[06:34.000 --> 06:47.000]  At no point has the judicial branch ever written an opinion by first aligning the rights of the people with the Constitution
[06:47.000 --> 06:59.000]  And then trying to determine whether or not the issue before them served to violate those rights or that Constitution
[06:59.000 --> 07:06.000]  See, this is the part that none of this system seems to understand in the way it does things
[07:06.000 --> 07:13.000]  The people created, and I know I've said this before, but I'm going to say it again because it bears repeating
[07:13.000 --> 07:23.000]  If the people are the ultimate political authority, the people, okay, that would be you and me
[07:23.000 --> 07:32.000]  If we are the ultimate political authority and we are the source of the Constitution
[07:32.000 --> 07:43.000]  And we created a Constitution for the purpose of creating something subordinate to said Constitution, known as government
[07:43.000 --> 07:53.000]  And then we created offices within that government that are separate and apart from each other
[07:53.000 --> 08:04.000]  So that each one is required to reach its own conclusions basically about the application and meaning of the Constitution in relation to their duties
[08:04.000 --> 08:11.000]  Which is true, the courts are not supposed to be the ultimate decider of what the Constitution means
[08:11.000 --> 08:21.000]  Because when that happens, the courts, the judges, the attorneys turn themselves into an oligarchy over the rest of us
[08:21.000 --> 08:28.000]  Because now our rights are based upon how they want to interpret the Constitution
[08:28.000 --> 08:35.000]  Rather than the Constitution forbidding them to interpret our rights in the first place
[08:35.000 --> 08:39.000]  You see how this is working out here?
[08:39.000 --> 08:48.000]  So that is a perspective that neither of these so-called constitutional attorneys or anyone before them has ever began with
[08:48.000 --> 08:54.000]  And it should be what every one of them begin with
[08:54.000 --> 09:02.000]  So let's step through this again, the people create the Constitution, we use the Constitution to create government
[09:02.000 --> 09:09.000]  We use the Constitution to assign the specific authorities that we are granting to that government
[09:09.000 --> 09:14.000]  We give them delegated powers and authority within that instrument
[09:14.000 --> 09:21.000]  They are divided up into separate but equal branches to do the individual functions we've given them
[09:21.000 --> 09:27.000]  And they are forbidden to cross into each other's area of authority
[09:27.000 --> 09:33.000]  Now, if that is the hierarchy, which we know it is
[09:33.000 --> 09:40.000]  Then the first thing we have to understand is that the servant cannot be greater than the master
[09:40.000 --> 09:48.000]  And therefore, laws made by the servant cannot bind the master
[09:48.000 --> 09:59.000]  It's really that easy of an equation, the lesser cannot rule the greater, period, okay?
[09:59.000 --> 10:05.000]  The sole purpose of government's interaction according to our delegated powers to them
[10:05.000 --> 10:13.000]  Is to use collective force against those that would violate the rights of another, period
[10:13.000 --> 10:24.000]  For any other intent and purpose, anything they enact and anything they do is not supposed to be in our lives, period
[10:24.000 --> 10:30.000]  I don't care what these so-called constitutional attorneys think about that
[10:30.000 --> 10:33.000]  That is the way it should have been set up to work
[10:33.000 --> 10:38.000]  If we're a nation of free people, as the Constitution declares we are
[10:38.000 --> 10:46.000]  If we are free individuals with individual rights, as the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence declares we are
[10:46.000 --> 10:56.000]  Then it is idiotic on its face for someone to presume, especially someone created in a subordinate authority
[10:56.000 --> 11:02.000]  That they have the power to dictate what we can and cannot do
[11:02.000 --> 11:12.000]  With the only exception in causing harm to the rights or property of another, or to the person of another, unjustifiably
[11:12.000 --> 11:15.000]  That's it
[11:15.000 --> 11:25.000]  So when these people are telling me that I'm not doing things properly and I'm wrong and I'm not being very patriotic because I'm misleading people
[11:25.000 --> 11:31.000]  Folks, I have told each and every one of you time and time again to take my word for nothing
[11:31.000 --> 11:33.000]  Never
[11:33.000 --> 11:38.000]  I do not want you to make the same mistake when it comes to the information I'm giving you
[11:38.000 --> 11:48.000]  That you and the generations before you have made in assuming that whoever is telling you something is telling it to you correctly
[11:48.000 --> 12:00.000]  Because that is the scenario that these so-called constitutional attorneys and their brethren ilk in the legal profession have actually done
[12:00.000 --> 12:09.000]  They have lied to your face, to mold society and law into how they want it to function
[12:09.000 --> 12:17.000]  Now why would they do that? You would think that ultimately they'd realize that they're cutting their own throat long term by doing it this way
[12:17.000 --> 12:26.000]  But let's look at the analysis of what really happens in real time and see why they probably don't care
[12:26.000 --> 12:39.000]  If we did not have attorneys creating laws that created conflicts and muddied the waters on the common law way of resolving those conflicts
[12:39.000 --> 12:50.000]  So that those conflicts require someone with intimate knowledge of that law along with intimate knowledge of the intricacies of the procedures
[12:50.000 --> 13:00.000]  That they have woven around the application and the judicial determinations of these laws
[13:00.000 --> 13:05.000]  We would be out here being able to fend for ourselves when someone sued us
[13:05.000 --> 13:14.000]  We could go to court without an attorney, get this hashed out, you know, in a very short amount of time compared to what's happening today
[13:14.000 --> 13:20.000]  And nobody gets paid a dime except for the person that's rightfully owed
[13:20.000 --> 13:31.000]  There's no one in the middle charging both sides and raking in a killing at everyone else's expense
[13:31.000 --> 13:34.000]  But that's what attorneys do
[13:34.000 --> 13:44.000]  And all judges at some point in any court of record in every state of the union currently were attorneys
[13:44.000 --> 13:54.000]  So they have built a system that allows them to use law to create conflicts that should not exist
[13:54.000 --> 14:09.000]  And the ones that do rightfully exist to take far longer to resolve and require far more effort to reach that resolution than should ever have been put into place
[14:09.000 --> 14:17.000]  But the only person with the good working knowledge most of the time of how all of these things tie together
[14:17.000 --> 14:24.000]  And what the real process is for getting resolution if any will ever actually be reached are the attorneys
[14:24.000 --> 14:31.000]  They have devised their own training system, they have devised their own educational system, they have devised their own qualification system
[14:31.000 --> 14:38.000]  They have devised a way to control an entire branch of our government
[14:38.000 --> 14:48.000]  They rule the whole thing, the common man has no say in the judicial department of government in any state of the union
[14:48.000 --> 14:50.000]  None
[14:50.000 --> 14:53.000]  How is that possible?
[14:53.000 --> 15:04.000]  Well, subversion, usurpation, fraud, that's how it's possible, it's the only way it's possible
[15:04.000 --> 15:14.000]  They write the laws that ensure that they are the only ones that can do it because not only have they seized control of the judicial department
[15:14.000 --> 15:20.000]  But they have infiltrated and seized control of every department
[15:20.000 --> 15:26.000]  They sit in the halls of the legislature writing laws to protect themselves and their thieving ways
[15:26.000 --> 15:36.000]  Their dishonest way of making a living at everyone else's expense
[15:36.000 --> 15:49.000]  They use the courts to enrich themselves and they could care less about you and I
[15:49.000 --> 15:58.000]  Now think about that, when you look at how this all pans out, it would be very difficult for you or anyone to point a finger in a different direction
[15:58.000 --> 16:03.000]  And say no, there's the real problem, at least at this level
[16:03.000 --> 16:15.000]  Now I know that there are much more shadowy figures going much further up the chain and so on and so forth that really are the ones that ultimately reap the benefit of all this
[16:15.000 --> 16:21.000]  But the fact of the matter is, they're not down here getting their hands dirty themselves
[16:21.000 --> 16:31.000]  These are the tools they're using and I'll mean that since in every possible connotation you can imagine when I refer to an attorney as a tool
[16:31.000 --> 16:47.000]  But that is what they're using to get that ultimate power into their hands is the fraudulent conversion of our system of government into a revenue system that drains it from us and transfers it to them
[16:47.000 --> 16:56.000]  It is a wealth transfer system in every sense of the word and these so-called constitutional attorneys are the thieves
[16:56.000 --> 17:01.000]  Alright folks, we'll be right back, y'all hang in there
[17:27.000 --> 17:32.000]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks
[17:32.000 --> 17:35.000]  First prize being a Spiked Skull Lower Receiver
[17:35.000 --> 17:37.000]  Second prize being a Taurus Curve
[17:37.000 --> 17:39.000]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor
[17:39.000 --> 17:45.000]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud
[17:45.000 --> 17:50.000]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin
[17:50.000 --> 17:52.000]  The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser
[17:52.000 --> 17:58.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air
[17:59.000 --> 18:04.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:04.000 --> 18:08.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method
[18:08.000 --> 18:14.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two
[18:14.000 --> 18:20.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[18:20.000 --> 18:24.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons
[18:24.000 --> 18:26.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[18:26.000 --> 18:28.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[18:28.000 --> 18:33.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[18:33.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[18:38.000 --> 18:40.000]  Personal consultation is available as well
[18:40.000 --> 18:46.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.000 --> 18:49.000]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[18:49.000 --> 18:51.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[18:51.000 --> 18:57.000]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.000 --> 19:00.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[19:00.000 --> 19:04.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network
[19:04.000 --> 19:21.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:21.000 --> 19:49.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:49.000 --> 19:51.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[19:51.000 --> 19:53.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:53.000 --> 19:57.000]  The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[19:57.000 --> 19:59.000]  All right.
[19:59.000 --> 20:04.000]  Now, let's understand something about this and the way it works.
[20:04.000 --> 20:12.000]  They have their own schools and they have their own requirements for getting into those schools and so on and so forth.
[20:12.000 --> 20:25.000]  Most laws in most every state that I know of, including Texas, forbid anyone to hold a judgeship if that position exists within a court of record.
[20:25.000 --> 20:32.000]  Now, I'm sure that they think they're the only ones properly educated in understanding law.
[20:32.000 --> 20:41.000]  And the way they keep changing it to be whatever they want it to be when they want it to be, that would probably almost be true.
[20:41.000 --> 20:54.000]  Now, the other thing about this is that most of these guys will tell you what the law is based upon what they have from court opinions, not from the actual black letter law itself.
[20:54.000 --> 21:05.000]  Most of them go with what the courts have ruled regardless of when that ruling was made and when the statutes that it applied to ever changed.
[21:05.000 --> 21:13.000]  For instance, there are several statutes that there's case law on here in Texas that they are still using as if it's valid,
[21:13.000 --> 21:22.000]  and yet the statutes to which it referred have been rewritten so that it's no longer valid, but they still use it.
[21:22.000 --> 21:31.000]  And when you raise it up in these lower courts and say, look, you're using a case opinion that was invalidated by the changes to the statutes.
[21:31.000 --> 21:37.000]  And it wasn't one dealing with an individual right, it was one dealing with the process that they're required to go through
[21:37.000 --> 21:43.000]  and what they're required as far as legal pleadings to do that process correctly.
[21:43.000 --> 21:45.000]  And they're still not doing it.
[21:45.000 --> 22:00.000]  And they're still ruling decades later in favor of the original ruling without ever addressing the changes in the statutes even when they've been raised.
[22:00.000 --> 22:01.000]  Okay.
[22:01.000 --> 22:07.000]  Now, one of these guys was also on there making exactly that argument.
[22:07.000 --> 22:12.000]  Well, that case law has been superseded because there's been legislative changes to the statutes.
[22:12.000 --> 22:21.000]  Well, newsflash, sir, the statutes do not have the authority to take away a right.
[22:21.000 --> 22:23.000]  They don't.
[22:23.000 --> 22:37.000]  And the other problem they have is they are acting as if the Constitution themselves are the source of our rights rather than the limits upon their authority to act in a governmental fashion.
[22:37.000 --> 22:43.000]  Every single thing they do is meant to transfer not only the wealth that we possess,
[22:43.000 --> 22:53.000]  but the power we exist politically from the hands of the people into the hands of the government, whether it be one branch or the other.
[22:53.000 --> 23:00.000]  This is exactly why you have kids being sent to jail for burping in gym class.
[23:00.000 --> 23:02.000]  Yeah, that's a real story, folks.
[23:02.000 --> 23:18.000]  In the last two days, there have been numerous arrests of children in schools, one of which was for a 15-year-old boy that was doing fake burping during his calisthenics class,
[23:18.000 --> 23:21.000]  gym basically as we all used to call it, all right?
[23:21.000 --> 23:23.000]  And he got the other students laughing.
[23:23.000 --> 23:27.000]  So the coach kicked him out and made him stand in the hallway.
[23:27.000 --> 23:33.000]  And the kid, of course, being a kid, kept leaning around the door and burping again anyway and get everybody laughing.
[23:33.000 --> 23:37.000]  And a teacher calls the school resource officer.
[23:37.000 --> 23:44.000]  In other words, they call a policeman, a real policeman that's working in the school as a resource officer,
[23:44.000 --> 23:53.000]  who first takes the kid to the administrator's office and then takes him and locks him up in the juvenile detention center for fake burping.
[23:53.000 --> 23:56.000]  This is the police state you're living in.
[23:56.000 --> 23:59.000]  This is the police state your children are living in.
[23:59.000 --> 24:10.000]  And it is these very things that these attorneys that do defense, do prosecution, and become judges in these courts of record allow to happen.
[24:10.000 --> 24:20.000]  The federal judge that this lawsuit for this child, when it was brought into his court, threw it out, saying, sure, they can throw him in jail for that.
[24:20.000 --> 24:29.000]  Whatever happened to that word reasonable when it came to warrantless searches, seizures, and arrest of the people,
[24:29.000 --> 24:38.000]  it is not reasonable, in my opinion, that someone be locked up because of a bad brake light or bad tail light or failed to turn signal,
[24:38.000 --> 24:45.000]  especially when none of those things result to get any injury to persons or property, none.
[24:45.000 --> 24:51.000]  And yet you will find these attorneys and these judges constantly saying, well, it can be done because of this.
[24:51.000 --> 24:52.000]  You've got to look at it this way.
[24:52.000 --> 25:02.000]  And then when you find something in black and white law that says they're wrong, their best response is, that's your interpretation.
[25:02.000 --> 25:09.000]  This is what I meant earlier about it will mean whatever they decide it means whenever they need it to.
[25:09.000 --> 25:12.000]  What it means today, it won't mean tomorrow.
[25:12.000 --> 25:18.000]  When it suits their power transfer from us to them, that's the way they'll rule on it.
[25:18.000 --> 25:20.000]  That's what the meaning will become.
[25:20.000 --> 25:26.000]  And this has been going on every since this country's been set up.
[25:26.000 --> 25:36.000]  It's always been something about rather than analyzing the rights of the people in comparison to the limits of authority,
[25:36.000 --> 25:43.000]  they simply say we have to exist equally with government, and that's not true.
[25:43.000 --> 25:46.000]  Government is subordinate to the people.
[25:46.000 --> 25:48.000]  It is a servant.
[25:48.000 --> 25:54.000]  By that definition alone, it can never exist and operate as an equal.
[25:54.000 --> 26:03.000]  And when it is exercising its delegated powers in a fashion that violates the provisions of the Constitution
[26:03.000 --> 26:13.000]  and the rights of the people it is meant to protect, they are using those delegated powers incorrectly.
[26:13.000 --> 26:18.000]  Under the common law standard, and I don't mean common law is decided by the courts.
[26:18.000 --> 26:26.000]  I mean common law is in common sense as in what the rights of individuals actually are from a human standpoint
[26:26.000 --> 26:34.000]  and an equal treatment standpoint when it comes to the application of any rule, okay?
[26:34.000 --> 26:38.000]  And that is that we all are entitled to due process.
[26:38.000 --> 26:47.000]  And there are very specific things involved in that due process in order for it to actually be due process.
[26:47.000 --> 26:54.000]  Right now in Texas you will not find a single justice or municipal court in this entire state
[26:54.000 --> 26:59.000]  that follows the rules of procedure as laid down for them to follow.
[26:59.000 --> 27:02.000]  Not a single one.
[27:02.000 --> 27:12.000]  Every one of them will alter those rules of procedure as necessary to do things the way they want to do them.
[27:12.000 --> 27:17.000]  Even if it means injury to your right of due process, they will bury it,
[27:17.000 --> 27:22.000]  mostly because these lower courts are not courts of record.
[27:22.000 --> 27:28.000]  Then when you move up to the next level to the county court or the county court at law to seek an appeal,
[27:28.000 --> 27:34.000]  when you come from a court of no record, it's a trial de novo, a do-over.
[27:34.000 --> 27:42.000]  And here we have the issue of they will not review any of the rights violations that occurred in the lower court
[27:42.000 --> 27:44.000]  because you're getting a do-over.
[27:44.000 --> 27:50.000]  Then what the hell was the purpose of subjecting you to the lower court in the first place
[27:50.000 --> 27:56.000]  if you can never have the injuries caused by that court addressed?
[27:56.000 --> 27:58.000]  What the hell is the point?
[27:58.000 --> 28:02.000]  It's a waste of money. It's a waste of time.
[28:02.000 --> 28:10.000]  But the simple fact is the odds are against you in being able to pay to get your appeal.
[28:10.000 --> 28:14.000]  And they know that.
[28:14.000 --> 28:18.000]  The system is intentionally written and designed that way.
[28:18.000 --> 28:21.000]  I know. I've read it. I've showed it to you.
[28:21.000 --> 28:26.000]  I've connected all those individual statutory dots to say here's what they're supposed to do,
[28:26.000 --> 28:29.000]  and you people yourselves have gone into these courts
[28:29.000 --> 28:34.000]  and experienced firsthand exactly what I told you they would do
[28:34.000 --> 28:40.000]  rather than what they're supposed to do.
[28:40.000 --> 28:43.000]  It's not that we always lose these cases. We don't.
[28:43.000 --> 28:49.000]  I've gotten way more than my fair share of these cases dismissed on the challenges that I make
[28:49.000 --> 28:57.000]  based both upon procedure and a misapplication of the statute in relation to transportation to begin with.
[28:57.000 --> 29:02.000]  Had more than one of my own dismissed because of that.
[29:02.000 --> 29:06.000]  But we still run into the same problem every time we go to a different court.
[29:06.000 --> 29:11.000]  And that is that maybe this court won't follow any of the rules and do it however they want
[29:11.000 --> 29:16.000]  and threaten you with jail through contempt if you attempt to put up a defense,
[29:16.000 --> 29:24.000]  which we see them do on a regular basis.
[29:24.000 --> 29:31.000]  How can you call yourself a constitutional attorney when you truly have no concept of what that means
[29:31.000 --> 29:38.000]  because of a direct failure to compare that to the individual rights of the people
[29:38.000 --> 29:41.000]  and the limited powers of government?
[29:41.000 --> 29:48.000]  Because the limited powers of government have no authority to supersede or coexist on an equal basis
[29:48.000 --> 29:55.000]  with the rights of the people when the exercise of those delegated powers violates those rights
[29:55.000 --> 29:57.000]  or interferes with them in any way.
[29:57.000 --> 30:01.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[30:01.000 --> 30:03.000]  Ah, fresh air.
[30:03.000 --> 30:07.000]  Did you know just breathing in a forest can turbocharge your immune system?
[30:07.000 --> 30:13.000]  I'm Paul Brecht, and in a moment I'll explain how better health could be as close as your local park.
[30:13.000 --> 30:17.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches
[30:17.000 --> 30:20.000]  and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[30:20.000 --> 30:21.000]  That's creepy.
[30:21.000 --> 30:23.000]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:23.000 --> 30:26.000]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:26.000 --> 30:30.000]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches,
[30:30.000 --> 30:33.000]  or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[30:33.000 --> 30:37.000]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[30:37.000 --> 30:40.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[30:40.000 --> 30:43.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:43.000 --> 30:48.000]  They're called phytoncides, airborne chemicals released by trees and plants
[30:48.000 --> 30:53.000]  to defend against insects and decay, and breathing them is extraordinarily good for you.
[30:53.000 --> 30:57.000]  Research shows that an hour or two in the woods lowers your blood pressure,
[30:57.000 --> 31:01.000]  slows your pulse rate, helps regulate blood sugar, and reduces stress hormones.
[31:01.000 --> 31:06.000]  Breathing plant-rich air also turbocharges your immune-boosting white blood cells
[31:06.000 --> 31:10.000]  and the body's natural killer cells, with effects lasting up to a week.
[31:10.000 --> 31:15.000]  The Japanese call basking in the woods shinrin-yoku, or forest bathing,
[31:15.000 --> 31:18.000]  and you're doing it whenever you smell that clean forest smell.
[31:18.000 --> 31:22.000]  So the next time you're feeling under the weather, head for the woods and breathe deep.
[31:22.000 --> 31:27.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:27.000 --> 31:31.000]  What are you thinking? Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics,
[31:31.000 --> 31:34.000]  or a total body detox for around $10 a month?
[31:34.000 --> 31:38.000]  If USA.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder
[31:38.000 --> 31:43.000]  for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon,
[31:43.000 --> 31:49.000]  and feel better than ever, it alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products.
[31:49.000 --> 31:54.000]  That saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367.
[31:54.000 --> 31:59.000]  Call 888-910-4367 only at nqsa.org.
[32:01.000 --> 32:04.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:04.000 --> 32:07.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[32:07.000 --> 32:09.000]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[32:09.000 --> 32:12.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.000 --> 32:15.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:15.000 --> 32:19.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.000 --> 32:23.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce
[32:23.000 --> 32:25.000]  and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.000 --> 32:28.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:28.000 --> 32:32.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand
[32:32.000 --> 32:35.000]  what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.000 --> 32:39.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[32:39.000 --> 32:42.000]  and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:42.000 --> 32:45.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.000 --> 32:48.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents,
[32:48.000 --> 32:50.000]  and other useful resource material.
[32:50.000 --> 32:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.000 --> 32:59.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.000 --> 33:06.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[33:14.000 --> 33:24.000]  Yes, I got the warrant, and I'm going to solve them, to the head of government then, prosecute them.
[33:24.000 --> 33:29.000]  Okay.
[33:43.000 --> 33:46.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:46.000 --> 33:51.000]  The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[33:51.000 --> 33:56.000]  Now, last thing before I start taking calls is this.
[33:56.000 --> 33:59.000]  I've had several of these people, including these two gentlemen,
[33:59.000 --> 34:03.000]  tell me that I'm not taking this into consideration or that into consideration
[34:03.000 --> 34:07.000]  or thinking about this or thinking about that, guess again.
[34:07.000 --> 34:13.000]  Everything they're talking about, I've looked at, I've thought about, and I've considered.
[34:13.000 --> 34:18.000]  And in a lot of cases, I've discarded it as being incompetently ignorant
[34:18.000 --> 34:23.000]  because it's a contradiction in terms with everything else that we actually know
[34:23.000 --> 34:28.000]  and everything else that as a free people, we have every right to expect.
[34:28.000 --> 34:33.000]  Okay. Let's begin with one thing they like to say.
[34:33.000 --> 34:43.000]  They say that the courts, when they create an opinion about a law, are creating law.
[34:43.000 --> 34:47.000]  But what not a single one of these attorneys can show me is where the Constitution
[34:47.000 --> 34:51.000]  authorizes the courts to ever create law.
[34:51.000 --> 34:56.000]  Their sole purpose is to interpret law, period.
[34:56.000 --> 35:00.000]  They can't rewrite it, even though that's exactly what they attempt to do from the bench,
[35:00.000 --> 35:02.000]  they attempt to rewrite it.
[35:02.000 --> 35:08.000]  Now, they have the power to declare it unenforceable, okay,
[35:08.000 --> 35:12.000]  which means any time a case would be brought into that court dealing with that law,
[35:12.000 --> 35:16.000]  they could say, look, we got a ruling that says this law is unenforceable,
[35:16.000 --> 35:22.000]  but they have no power to interpret it in a way that actually rewrites it.
[35:22.000 --> 35:25.000]  Yet they do it all the time.
[35:25.000 --> 35:31.000]  You see it right now in these people that actually go to court and try to argue a right to travel,
[35:31.000 --> 35:35.000]  which by the way, gentlemen that may be listening, if you're out there doing so,
[35:35.000 --> 35:39.000]  I have never ever told people to argue right to travel,
[35:39.000 --> 35:43.000]  because in my opinion, that is the incorrect argument to be making in these cases
[35:43.000 --> 35:48.000]  because no one's being charged with a violation of the right to travel.
[35:48.000 --> 35:54.000]  Everyone is being charged with violating a regulatory statute that deals with an occupation
[35:54.000 --> 36:03.000]  where the rules are being codified under a specific subject known as transportation.
[36:03.000 --> 36:11.000]  So what you're being accused of through that citation is a violation of the transportation regulations.
[36:11.000 --> 36:16.000]  But what no one is bothering to prove in a court of law, again,
[36:16.000 --> 36:20.000]  even when they're not playing by their own rules of evidence,
[36:20.000 --> 36:29.000]  they are presuming that the individual is engaged in the subject matter to which the regulatory statute applies,
[36:29.000 --> 36:38.000]  when in fact there is zero evidence the individual is engaging in that activity, none, not a zip.
[36:38.000 --> 36:43.000]  It is simply presumed as one of the necessary elements of the allegation.
[36:43.000 --> 36:49.000]  It is presumed even when the allegation is considered to be a crime.
[36:49.000 --> 36:55.000]  Once again, not playing by their own rules since they have court opinions that clearly state
[36:55.000 --> 37:03.000]  in terms of a criminal punishment, none of the primary elements to the case can be presumed.
[37:03.000 --> 37:07.000]  They must be proven.
[37:07.000 --> 37:12.000]  Now, once again, if we look at the subject matter being regulated by this regulatory code,
[37:12.000 --> 37:18.000]  which is all this statute is, is a regulatory code, it is not the actual law.
[37:18.000 --> 37:22.000]  It is an agency interpretation of that law.
[37:22.000 --> 37:28.000]  Every attorney knows this, and yet they attempt to use it as if it is the law, knowing it isn't,
[37:28.000 --> 37:32.000]  again, a violation of their own rules.
[37:32.000 --> 37:42.000]  Because if you and I attempt to introduce a statute as evidence of the law in a trial, in court, we will be denied.
[37:42.000 --> 37:51.000]  Yet the instrument they're using to make the allegation against you cites that statute as its only authority for the crime,
[37:51.000 --> 37:55.000]  or making the charge rather for the crime.
[37:55.000 --> 38:00.000]  Do you understand the contradiction we're looking at here?
[38:00.000 --> 38:06.000]  So when they get you into this court, none of them are addressing the primary issue here.
[38:06.000 --> 38:10.000]  Was the person engaged in the activity that the subject matter specifically regulates?
[38:10.000 --> 38:12.000]  Transportation.
[38:12.000 --> 38:21.000]  And here in Texas, that is exactly what the bill enacted by the legislature in all of the original laws says it applies to.
[38:21.000 --> 38:26.000]  It is exactly what the recodified bill says it applies to.
[38:26.000 --> 38:28.000]  Transportation.
[38:28.000 --> 38:33.000]  It doesn't define that term, but the courts have already defined it.
[38:33.000 --> 38:41.000]  And you have chapter 311 and 312 of the government code here in Texas that tells you that if this is a word of art,
[38:41.000 --> 38:51.000]  or it has a common meaning within an industry, or by legal creation, then that is the definition that will apply.
[38:51.000 --> 38:59.000]  So even though the term transportation is not defined in any code in Texas, there is a legal definition for it.
[38:59.000 --> 39:05.000]  There is an industry definition for it, and it is both one and the same.
[39:05.000 --> 39:15.000]  The movement of goods or property or persons from point A to point B as a business by a carrier, okay, for compensation or hire as a carrier.
[39:15.000 --> 39:16.000]  What is a carrier?
[39:16.000 --> 39:20.000]  Again, a singular term not defined in Texas law anywhere.
[39:20.000 --> 39:26.000]  But again, it is defined by other law controlling upon the subject matter, okay?
[39:26.000 --> 39:35.000]  Definition of a carrier is someone engaged in the business of transporting person's goods or property from point A to point B for compensation or hire.
[39:35.000 --> 39:42.000]  And yet I have these so-called constitutional attorneys telling me that I'm wrong.
[39:42.000 --> 39:53.000]  And part of their argument, or at least the inference of their argument is, is that I'm wrong because the Constitution doesn't say I can do it, to which my rebuttal was newsflash.
[39:53.000 --> 39:55.000]  The Constitution is not the source of our rights.
[39:55.000 --> 40:05.000]  And you're forgetting one little thing about your reading of that Constitution, that any powers not specifically given to government stay with the states or with the people.
[40:05.000 --> 40:13.000]  Now, the state has no more power to interfere with an individual fundamental right than the federal government does.
[40:13.000 --> 40:19.000]  And the only people that seem to think so are status and the status attorneys.
[40:19.000 --> 40:21.000]  Now, why is that?
[40:21.000 --> 40:27.000]  Why does someone believe that the state can take away a right with a mere statute?
[40:27.000 --> 40:33.000]  Why do they think that they can convert a right into a mere privilege using nothing but a statute?
[40:33.000 --> 40:44.000]  Why do they think that a majority vote, so-called, of the people to create this rule is somehow binding upon those that don't agree with it?
[40:44.000 --> 40:48.000]  You're talking about public policy versus consent.
[40:48.000 --> 40:53.000]  And our law is not based upon public policy.
[40:53.000 --> 41:02.000]  It is based upon individual consent, hence the phrase consent of the governed, something else you gentlemen seem to forget.
[41:02.000 --> 41:16.000]  Now, I don't care what your court opinions are when your court opinions clearly violate the principles inherent in individual rights,
[41:16.000 --> 41:23.000]  that by their own language clearly violate the prohibitions within a Constitution.
[41:23.000 --> 41:28.000]  And believe me, there are many such cases that do exactly that.
[41:28.000 --> 41:42.000]  There are court interpretations that clearly violate constitutional principles and individual rights by their mere existence.
[41:42.000 --> 41:53.000]  And no one is responsible for those except for one classification of individuals, attorneys.
[41:53.000 --> 42:10.000]  Attorneys spend 90% of their time arguing about what a law is and then 10% of their time going into court to argue what it isn't.
[42:10.000 --> 42:13.000]  When it suits us, give it meaning A.
[42:13.000 --> 42:23.000]  When we need to win a case and it has to be under that same law and we need it to go the other way, it now means B.
[42:23.000 --> 42:33.000]  And if you don't believe that, go read some of these case opinions and you will see very clearly that that's exactly what they do.
[42:33.000 --> 42:39.000]  Now, I've got a minute and a half left in this before I go into the next segment, so I'm not going to take any callers yet.
[42:39.000 --> 42:43.000]  But before I go there, there is one thing I would like everyone to know.
[42:43.000 --> 42:55.000]  The next caller I'm going to take on the other side is going to be one of these very attorneys that began this addressing of my ability to be so incorrect in an email.
[42:55.000 --> 43:05.000]  So when he comes up on the air in the next segment, once we're done with him and you guys call in, keep it clean, all right?
[43:05.000 --> 43:14.000]  Be reasonable, but try to stay on point with it if you call for anything to address what he says, okay?
[43:14.000 --> 43:20.000]  But the point being, I'm going to give him an opportunity to address what I've said, all right?
[43:20.000 --> 43:27.000]  Something I would never have the opportunity to do if it was me facing a group of them.
[43:27.000 --> 43:32.000]  So I'm going to try to be more than fair about this and hear what he has to say.
[43:32.000 --> 43:37.000]  So y'all hang in, and we'll be right back after this break, all right?
[43:37.000 --> 43:45.000]  If you want to get in line and make a comment afterwards, the call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[43:45.000 --> 44:00.000]  Give us a call, and we will talk to you when we get back.
[44:00.000 --> 44:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.000 --> 44:09.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand,
[44:09.000 --> 44:14.000]  4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.000 --> 44:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.000 --> 44:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.000 --> 44:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:38.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.000 --> 45:03.000]  pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.000 --> 45:09.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store
[45:09.000 --> 45:13.000]  at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas.
[45:13.000 --> 45:17.000]  I'm Brave New Books and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products
[45:17.000 --> 45:21.000]  with your very own eyes. Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay
[45:21.000 --> 45:23.000]  that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:27.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Auxiliary E-Me oil,
[45:27.000 --> 45:31.000]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:38.000]  Call 512-264-4043, or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:48.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.000 --> 46:15.000]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:15.000 --> 46:37.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:37.000 --> 46:43.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling numbers 512-646-1984.
[46:43.000 --> 46:46.000]  And we are going to take Juan in Colorado.
[46:46.000 --> 46:49.000]  All right, Juan, what can we do for you?
[46:49.000 --> 46:52.000]  Well, Eddie, thanks for taking my call.
[46:52.000 --> 46:53.000]  Sure.
[46:53.000 --> 46:58.000]  I just want to tell you that I am not the type of attorney that you describe.
[46:58.000 --> 47:00.000]  Well, I would hope not.
[47:00.000 --> 47:05.000]  The unfortunate thing is is I've rarely met one that actually followed through on what you just said.
[47:05.000 --> 47:09.000]  Now, if you're not, praise be to the Lord. Good. I'm glad to hear it.
[47:09.000 --> 47:13.000]  Okay.
[47:13.000 --> 47:18.000]  Yeah, I don't believe that the collective legal system, as you describe, is uniquely empowered
[47:18.000 --> 47:22.000]  and intellectually equipped to be the sole purveyors of truth and understanding.
[47:22.000 --> 47:28.000]  I have fought against that collective for over 35 years, teaching them lessons in the courts.
[47:28.000 --> 47:33.000]  I have actually defended the God-given rights you cherish on the legal battlefield.
[47:33.000 --> 47:38.000]  And with the help of God and right-minded judges have prevailed.
[47:38.000 --> 47:47.000]  Now, what you don't realize is people like me who've been trained and schooled like the evil ones
[47:47.000 --> 47:53.000]  are here to fight them, and at times we do beat them.
[47:53.000 --> 47:57.000]  It's that at times you're putting in there that bothers me.
[47:57.000 --> 48:00.000]  And I know that's not necessarily up to you to do.
[48:00.000 --> 48:04.000]  Don't get me wrong, I'm not blaming you for the at times.
[48:04.000 --> 48:08.000]  The fact that you have to say at times points a finger at what I'm saying,
[48:08.000 --> 48:14.000]  that the system doesn't play fair even when it's facing one of its own.
[48:14.000 --> 48:23.000]  Well, and that is why people like me exist, is to try to make it as fair as possible
[48:23.000 --> 48:28.000]  and try to keep the government in check.
[48:28.000 --> 48:33.000]  People like me, we stand between the government and the rights of the people.
[48:33.000 --> 48:36.000]  And without us, you would have tyranny that you would not believe.
[48:36.000 --> 48:39.000]  Oh, I believe it, but you have to understand something.
[48:39.000 --> 48:47.000]  I realize you love quoting Jefferson, and I, too, admire his ideology.
[48:47.000 --> 48:53.000]  But what you have to understand, and I didn't make it very clear,
[48:53.000 --> 48:58.000]  but we the people and exactly what that means,
[48:58.000 --> 49:03.000]  we the people came together and gave consent,
[49:03.000 --> 49:08.000]  gave up some of our individual liberty to be governed.
[49:08.000 --> 49:13.000]  And we the people means the whole, the society.
[49:13.000 --> 49:18.000]  So the Constitution was written not only to guarantee individual liberty,
[49:18.000 --> 49:25.000]  but to guarantee the liberty of we the people as a whole.
[49:25.000 --> 49:28.000]  Okay, can I address something before you continue from there?
[49:28.000 --> 49:29.000]  Can I address something?
[49:29.000 --> 49:30.000]  Sure.
[49:30.000 --> 49:31.000]  Okay.
[49:31.000 --> 49:32.000]  Sure.
[49:32.000 --> 49:35.000]  The concept of that, originally, I completely agree with,
[49:35.000 --> 49:39.000]  but you have one problem with it, and that is the fact that we the people
[49:39.000 --> 49:43.000]  were not parties to the original inception of the Constitution.
[49:43.000 --> 49:48.000]  People prior to us were, and you know in any form of contract law
[49:48.000 --> 49:52.000]  that someone that was never an original party to the contract
[49:52.000 --> 49:56.000]  was bound by any terminology or part of that contract.
[49:56.000 --> 50:01.000]  Now, that again goes to the entire premise of the consent of the governed.
[50:01.000 --> 50:07.000]  We accept the application of the Constitution in its intended nature
[50:07.000 --> 50:12.000]  of governing government, and I disagree with your assessment that we,
[50:12.000 --> 50:16.000]  when we came together, gave up our liberties to be governed,
[50:16.000 --> 50:20.000]  because that again, as you are aware, I pointed out.
[50:20.000 --> 50:24.000]  It's in the Declaration of Independence where it says,
[50:24.000 --> 50:29.000]  it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and to institute new government,
[50:29.000 --> 50:34.000]  laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its power in such form
[50:34.000 --> 50:40.000]  as to them shall seem most likely to affect their safety and happiness.
[50:40.000 --> 50:42.000]  The people came to that.
[50:42.000 --> 50:46.000]  Now, and you and I, certainly we weren't, well, my relatives,
[50:46.000 --> 50:49.000]  I don't know about you, but my relatives were a party to it.
[50:49.000 --> 50:52.000]  There are people who have been here since the 1500s.
[50:52.000 --> 50:57.000]  But we all take advantage of that contract, if you want to call it.
[50:57.000 --> 50:59.000]  It's actually a compact, but...
[50:59.000 --> 51:01.000]  Yeah, I don't agree that it's a contract either.
[51:01.000 --> 51:04.000]  I'm just using what everybody tends to use in reference to it.
[51:04.000 --> 51:06.000]  And again...
[51:06.000 --> 51:11.000]  All I've been trying to, the only point I was trying to make was,
[51:11.000 --> 51:16.000]  for the purposes of the consent of the governed,
[51:16.000 --> 51:23.000]  that means we did give up a little bit of our freedom for the betterment of the whole.
[51:23.000 --> 51:25.000]  Otherwise, you have anarchy.
[51:25.000 --> 51:29.000]  You have 300 million people in the United States deciding what laws,
[51:29.000 --> 51:32.000]  individually, they will accept or reject.
[51:32.000 --> 51:33.000]  That's anarchy.
[51:33.000 --> 51:37.000]  That leads to the abolition of individual rights.
[51:37.000 --> 51:39.000]  History's proven that.
[51:39.000 --> 51:43.000]  But then again, let's go back to what you mentioned as far as the Declaration of Independence.
[51:43.000 --> 51:46.000]  We need to understand the terminology here.
[51:46.000 --> 51:49.000]  Effect versus affect.
[51:49.000 --> 51:52.000]  Effect is to put into place, to make happen.
[51:52.000 --> 51:53.000]  That's right.
[51:53.000 --> 51:54.000]  Okay.
[51:54.000 --> 51:57.000]  So in the relation to what the powers of government are,
[51:57.000 --> 52:00.000]  to effect the safety and welfare of the people,
[52:00.000 --> 52:03.000]  I fail to see how that means surrender our liberties.
[52:03.000 --> 52:11.000]  In that regard, the way I interpret the meaning of that is very, very simple.
[52:11.000 --> 52:17.000]  We consent to be punished if we harm someone else or their rights or their property.
[52:17.000 --> 52:24.000]  In that regard, we are willing to surrender our liberty if we are convicted of a crime that says we did that.
[52:24.000 --> 52:30.000]  Otherwise, stay out of my life in the story, as far as I'm concerned, and I read it.
[52:30.000 --> 52:32.000]  Now, that to me is effect.
[52:32.000 --> 52:39.000]  That's how you effect my safety and welfare is to prevent somebody else from using greater force of arms or numbers
[52:39.000 --> 52:46.000]  to interfere with my right to live, period.
[52:46.000 --> 52:53.000]  Listen, we don't disagree on the value of individual liberty.
[52:53.000 --> 52:56.000]  We're in total agreement there.
[52:56.000 --> 53:07.000]  The only difference we have is the way it relates to we the people as a whole, as a society, as a country, as a tribe,
[53:07.000 --> 53:09.000]  however the hell you want to call it.
[53:09.000 --> 53:11.000]  It's we the people.
[53:11.000 --> 53:12.000]  We're together.
[53:12.000 --> 53:22.000]  We can be individuals and have our feelings and have our jobs and exercise our freedoms,
[53:22.000 --> 53:27.000]  but those freedoms in a civilized society are tempered.
[53:27.000 --> 53:33.000]  They're not done away with, as you seem to think.
[53:33.000 --> 53:38.000]  They're just tempered for the good of the whole.
[53:38.000 --> 53:40.000]  Yeah, but that's collectivism.
[53:40.000 --> 53:42.000]  That's not individual liberty.
[53:42.000 --> 53:45.000]  No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
[53:45.000 --> 53:52.000]  You don't understand my name, Juan Gault, John Gault.
[53:52.000 --> 53:54.000]  Do you know who John Gault was?
[53:54.000 --> 53:55.000]  Yes, sir.
[53:55.000 --> 53:57.000]  But my point on what you're addressing here...
[53:57.000 --> 54:05.000]  I am so far against the collective and I have worked against the collective for 35 years, both politically and legally.
[54:05.000 --> 54:11.000]  Okay, I'm not disagreeing with your assessment of tempered rights.
[54:11.000 --> 54:13.000]  I'm not disagreeing with that at all.
[54:13.000 --> 54:14.000]  I understand that.
[54:14.000 --> 54:16.000]  I understand you'll disagree.
[54:16.000 --> 54:18.000]  No, no, I don't disagree.
[54:18.000 --> 54:22.000]  I don't disagree with that our rights are tempered, but they're self-tempered.
[54:22.000 --> 54:26.000]  I can't exercise my right to the detriment of another.
[54:26.000 --> 54:29.000]  I don't need someone to tell me not to do that.
[54:29.000 --> 54:33.000]  Yes, that may work very well for Eddie.
[54:33.000 --> 54:39.000]  But Eddie's just an individual that's in a hole, and you have to not only look at yourself,
[54:39.000 --> 54:46.000]  but you have to look at your fellow man, at your fellow countryman.
[54:46.000 --> 54:51.000]  And that's the difference between you and I, and that's what I came to learn.
[54:51.000 --> 54:55.000]  I didn't come to learn in law school.
[54:55.000 --> 54:58.000]  And I had liberal teachers.
[54:58.000 --> 55:00.000]  I had liberal professors, but they didn't affect me.
[55:00.000 --> 55:09.000]  I knew what was going on because I still have the fundamental beliefs I had back in the 70s when me and several others started this stuff.
[55:09.000 --> 55:10.000]  I haven't changed.
[55:10.000 --> 55:15.000]  I've just learned how to play the game and beat them at it.
[55:15.000 --> 55:18.000]  Have you ever heard of D.C. versus Heller?
[55:18.000 --> 55:19.000]  Yeah.
[55:19.000 --> 55:22.000]  Yeah, well, I was part of that legal team, pro bono.
[55:22.000 --> 55:24.000]  I didn't make a dime off of it.
[55:24.000 --> 55:27.000]  That's the kind of attorney I am.
[55:27.000 --> 55:34.000]  So when you start creating animosity for attorneys and throwing us all in one group,
[55:34.000 --> 55:47.000]  you're missing us spies that are out there and doing and fighting the fight to try to keep it from going to guns and ammo and civil war.
[55:47.000 --> 55:51.000]  We try to do it in a civilized manner.
[55:51.000 --> 56:01.000]  But it just really makes me sad when you lump all attorneys and a constitutional attorney with such animus.
[56:01.000 --> 56:03.000]  It makes no sense to me.
[56:03.000 --> 56:04.000]  I can understand.
[56:04.000 --> 56:06.000]  I fought these guys.
[56:06.000 --> 56:08.000]  I know what they're like.
[56:08.000 --> 56:12.000]  They go home and kiss their children and love them too, but they're misguided.
[56:12.000 --> 56:14.000]  I get that.
[56:14.000 --> 56:18.000]  And like I said, I've been fighting them for 35 years.
[56:18.000 --> 56:22.000]  You ever hear of the Hobby Lobby case?
[56:22.000 --> 56:23.000]  I was involved with that too.
[56:23.000 --> 56:27.000]  Those are the type of issues and cases that I take.
[56:27.000 --> 56:32.000]  That's the kind of attorney I am.
[56:32.000 --> 56:35.000]  Okay, well, I understand something.
[56:35.000 --> 56:42.000]  I was in no way trying to attack you personally, but the ideas that I perceived from your email, not you as a man.
[56:42.000 --> 56:43.000]  I don't know you as a man.
[56:43.000 --> 56:46.000]  I can't attack you as a man.
[56:46.000 --> 56:55.000]  Okay, I was saying in my email is you have to have a bigger picture of what we the people mean, what rights of the people means.
[56:55.000 --> 57:01.000]  You've used that term several times talking about rights of the people.
[57:01.000 --> 57:02.000]  Well, that means society.
[57:02.000 --> 57:13.000]  We have rights as a society as a whole, and we can't have 300 million people deciding what laws they will or will not conform to.
[57:13.000 --> 57:22.000]  We have U.S. gangs right now and international terrorists that believe they're exercising their rights as they see fit.
[57:22.000 --> 57:25.000]  And you want everybody in the country that way?
[57:25.000 --> 57:28.000]  But let's look at the things they're exercising.
[57:28.000 --> 57:31.000]  Let's take a minute and look at the things you're talking about.
[57:31.000 --> 57:35.000]  Most of the things where you're talking about these gangs are doing what they see fit.
[57:35.000 --> 57:44.000]  They're running their gangs, selling drugs, you know, pimping out women, you know, trafficking in persons, you name it.
[57:44.000 --> 57:46.000]  They believe that's their right.
[57:46.000 --> 57:49.000]  As long as we believe it is, they believe it's their right.
[57:49.000 --> 57:51.000]  Well, but hang on a second.
[57:51.000 --> 57:54.000]  In a sense, this is what I'm getting at.
[57:54.000 --> 58:04.000]  Most of the stuff that they're having to go and do in violation of law is only because someone tried to make a law that they shouldn't have been making.
[58:04.000 --> 58:13.000]  I mean, if people want to indulge in something that destroys them themselves, whose right is it to stop that?
[58:13.000 --> 58:20.000]  And I'm not, not in any way am I saying that should be society as a whole as far as people being allowed to do it to others.
[58:20.000 --> 58:31.000]  But we're still down to the issue of individual choice, that free exercise of will, you know, the thing that God gave each and every one of us to do, freedom of choice.
[58:31.000 --> 58:33.000]  We're talking about denying that.
[58:33.000 --> 58:36.000]  Okay, well hang on just a second because I got a break and then we'll pick this up on the other side.
[58:36.000 --> 58:37.000]  Okay, so please hang on, Juan.
[58:37.000 --> 58:38.000]  Sure.
[58:38.000 --> 58:43.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio and we will be right back after this break.
[58:43.000 --> 58:50.000]  We're going to be talking to Juan again, so y'all hang on.
[58:50.000 --> 58:58.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:06.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:06.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:18.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:28.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:48.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:17.000]  Today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:17.000 --> 01:00:28.000]  Markets for Wednesday, the 27th of July, 2016, are currently trading with gold at $1,327.05 an ounce, silver at $19.95 an ounce,
[01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:41.000]  Texas crude, $42.92 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 658 U.S. currency.
[01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Today in history, the year 1929, the Geneva Convention dealing with the treatment of prisoners of war is signed by 53 nations.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:56.000]  Its provisions dealt mostly with the capture and captivity of prisoners of war and the classification and treatment of civilians during war.
[01:00:56.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  The 1929 Geneva Convention agreement was signed today in history.
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  In recent news, Julian Assange, via his anonymous whistleblower site, WikiLeaks, released 20,000 hacked emails from the Democratic National Convention on Friday,
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  July 22nd, days before the commencement of the convention on Monday, allowing it to be disseminated and read over the weekend.
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:27.000]  The emails were so embarrassingly damning that they resulted in Debbie Schultz, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, resigning on Sunday, a day before the opening ceremonies.
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:33.000]  Amongst the litany of embarrassing emails leaked by WikiLeaks, there were emails from January 2015 to May 2016,
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  where DNC staff essentially preselected Hillary for the nomination discussing how to deal with Bernie Sanders in order to ensure Clinton's nomination long before any votes have been cast.
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:52.000]  The bulk of released emails come from seven prominent DNC staff members, Senior Advisor Andrew Wright, National Finance Director Jordan Kaplan, Finance Chief of Staff Scott Comer,
[01:01:52.000 --> 01:02:01.000]  Northern California Finance Director Robert Stowe, Finance Director of Data and Strategic Initiatives Daniel Parrish, Finance Director Alan Zachary, and Miranda.
[01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  Amongst the emails was one dated May 5th, where the chief financial officer of the Democratic National Committee,
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:12.000]  Brad Marshall, suggested attacking Sanders over his Jewish heritage, contrasted to his atheistic tendencies.
[01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:23.000]  This WikiLeak release comes weeks after hacker Guccifer 2.0 had released several internal memos showing that the DNC staff were strategizing to make Clinton the presidential nominee as early as March 2015.
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  This release was followed by a class action lawsuit against Debbie Schultz and the DNC in June by Florida-based law firm Beck and Lee.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:38.000]  If this wasn't enough, an email dated May 6th from the DNC digital office and Obama campaign veteran Rebecca Christopher read,
[01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:46.000]  quote, attached to the script for a new video we'd like to use to mop up some of the more Taco Bull engagement and demonstrate that Trump actually isn't trying.
[01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  It is yet unclear whether she was referring to Donald Trump's Cinco de Mayo tweet or to the Hispanic voting constituents as the Taco Bell engagement.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  This is Brooke Brody with your Lowdown for July 27, 2016.
[01:03:00.000 --> 01:03:12.000]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty.
[01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:19.000]  I read his book and it says he cares not for the unsightly.
[01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:26.000]  These warmongers come by that term rightly.
[01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:36.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984, and I am still talking with Juan in Colorado.
[01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:44.000]  All right, Juan, before we jump back into this, let me get back into what you were saying here about this, that society has rights and all this.
[01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:50.000]  I disagree. All rights are individual rights.
[01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:53.000]  There are no society rights. There are no collectivist rights.
[01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:56.000]  They're individual rights.
[01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  And the limit of their exercise is only to the point that we may not harm the rights or property or person of another.
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  Now, when you say it's a bad thing, it would be anarchy for people to pick and choose what laws they obey.
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  If the law shouldn't be there, why shouldn't they get to do that?
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  See, there's something else that I've said myself, and that is this, that no person is more justified when they refuse to enforce or obey any law which is itself the only source of harm to an individual or group.
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  And that is what 99.9% of the bogus statutory crap in existence is.
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:42.000]  It's a way to regulate private lives through commercial means.
[01:04:42.000 --> 01:04:50.000]  It is using commercially applicable rules to tax illegally the people's private activities.
[01:04:50.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  That's exactly what the right to travel issue versus not engaging in transportation gets into, which is what our original debate came about was my video on transportation versus right to travel.
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:06.000]  In that, the rules are very simple to me.
[01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  When you read the statute, the subject matter is transportation.
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:17.000]  Everything that goes into that code, if you picture that code as a box, deals with transportation.
[01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:18.000]  It has to.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:25.000]  Our Constitution says no bill passed by the legislature can deal with more than one subject.
[01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  It used to say object, but they expanded that to include an entire subject matter.
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:34.000]  Well, the subject is transportation in this code.
[01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  Now, everything that's written into that code regulates some aspect or some subordinate subject of that overall subject matter, which has nothing to do with private individuals.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:50.000]  My rights are to use common sense.
[01:05:50.000 --> 01:06:03.000]  So when I go to an intersection knowing very well why a red light is there, I know I need to be on the watch out if it's not in my favor that I need to stop so as not to cause a collision with someone.
[01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  But I don't need to ask the state's permission to be there.
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:14.000]  I don't need to pay the state a fee to use my property to get there is my point in all this.
[01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  What we're talking about here in our original conversation via the email is I tell people never make the argument of right to travel because it's a completely incorrect argument for what's actually happening.
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  We're not dealing with a violation of a right to travel.
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  We're dealing with a violation, allegedly, of a regulatory code, which has a limited focus in its subject matter.
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:44.000]  And what the state fails to do in every single case is to allege involvement in that subject matter.
[01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:50.000]  But they always get their convictions when people don't know to rebut it.
[01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  Now, that's fraud.
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  No matter how you slice it, that's fraud.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  They know it's fraud, but they hide it.
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:06.000]  Now, I realize from your perspective that you spend, in your mind, a lot of time fighting against this kind of stuff, and you're saying aim big.
[01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  Well, the difference between you and me is I'm not part of that society.
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  I have no desire to be a part of that society.
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:21.000]  Another difference between you and I is I have actually overturned unjust laws.
[01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:26.000]  I have actually defeated unlawful government actions.
[01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:28.000]  I have changed laws.
[01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:30.000]  That's a difference between you and me.
[01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:32.000]  I have accomplished substantial things.
[01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  But you had to be a member of the club to do it.
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:37.000]  That's the problem.
[01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  See, the thing is, is what you're talking about.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:42.000]  That's why I became a member of the club.
[01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  Well, maybe.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  But we, the people, should not have.
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:48.000]  That's called being a spy.
[01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:49.000]  Well, okay, fine.
[01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  Be a spy.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:51.000]  Be a spy.
[01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  But the fact of the matter is the people should not have to join a club that is screwing everybody to get justice.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:02.000]  We should be able to get justice by saying, look.
[01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:05.000]  If they were educated, they could do it.
[01:08:05.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  They would know how.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:11.000]  It's like you can't watch a Super Bowl and then think you can play professional football.
[01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:15.000]  You can't read a medical book and then think you can do surgery.
[01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  But wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  The problem here is you're putting everybody into the same box when it comes to that.
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  Okay?
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:26.000]  You may very well be incorrect.
[01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  There will be individuals out there that have the capabilities to see it once and do it right.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  There are those that can learn it without the formalities.
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  What?
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:39.000]  And there will be those that read and can't do it.
[01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  That's true.
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  I'm not arguing that.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:47.000]  But the point is, as you said to me, you're trying to put everybody in one box.
[01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  No, I'm not.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  I'm trying to give you a logical explanation and reasoning why things are the way they are.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:57.000]  But that's not explaining why they're the way they are.
[01:08:57.000 --> 01:08:58.000]  Explain to me.
[01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:03.000]  Try to explain to me, what is your end goal?
[01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  What do you hope to accomplish?
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  What are you going to change?
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:11.000]  How is the world going to be, how is this country going to be better?
[01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  What are you going to accomplish?
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:14.000]  What laws are you going to change?
[01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:17.000]  What are you doing to affect that change?
[01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  That's what I want to know.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:20.000]  No, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:23.000]  What am I trying to change?
[01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:24.000]  What am I going to change?
[01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:25.000]  Well, let's see.
[01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:26.000]  You saw the video.
[01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  That's why you contacted me.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  So you know where one of my focuses is.
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:40.000]  And the reason I chose that is because that's the one area of law where it will not cost people an arm and a leg to fight back,
[01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  to learn the system, to actually get experience under their belt for the kind of crap this system tries to put on someone that is not a member of the club.
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  But that's the way that people have to do that.
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:09:58.000]  Yeah, pay some attorney to do it.
[01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:00.000]  No, no, it's called your vote.
[01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  It's called getting.
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  No, no, no, no, no.
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  You're sitting here trying to equivocate my rights with my ability to vote.
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:13.000]  You're equivocating my right to govern my public servants through nothing more than a vote.
[01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  That's not the way this is set up.
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  That's how you kick out the bad.
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  No, no, no, no, no, no.
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  Disagree.
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:22.000]  And I'll tell you why.
[01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  The Texas Constitution specifically says that information is incorrect.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  The Texas Constitution, as will most states if you will read them, says very clearly that the people reserve the right to abolish or alter their government in any means or by any means they deem necessary when that government no longer serves them.
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:48.000]  Who are the people?
[01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  It sure as hell is not those in one particular part of the government.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  People is plural. That means it's all the people decide, not the individual.
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  Who are the people?
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:02.000]  Who are we the people?
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  That's plural.
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:04.000]  That's everybody.
[01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  I understand that.
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  But how do you get them to think like that something's wrong without first telling them and showing them how it's wrong?
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  How do you get them on your side to be that group to do it?
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  See, you're talking about the difference between who have the rights to do something versus who has the power of force to do something.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  There's a big difference here.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  When you talk about the collection of the people, you're talking about numbers capable of exerting the necessary force to do what must be done.
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:51.000]  Even if we resort to peaceful means first and get no results and eventually have to go back to the bullet box rather than the ballot box.
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  I don't disagree.
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:57.000]  Okay. So all I did in my video was attempt to – wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:11:57.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  I believe like Jefferson said, I believe that the tree of liberty has to be refreshed with the blood of a revolution.
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  I believe that, but I don't want it to come to that.
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:13.000]  Neither do I, and I say that constantly.
[01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  Neither do I.
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  That is exactly why I use this platform to try to educate people on these statutory constructs and how they are intentionally designed to mislead the public.
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:28.000]  I try to get people –
[01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:31.000]  You're creating very angry people.
[01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:38.000]  You would not believe what your listeners call me and what they say and the way they talk.
[01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:39.000]  Oh, I believe it.
[01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  And they get it from you.
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:43.000]  And that solves no problems.
[01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  That gets nothing done.
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:49.000]  I'm a person that I like to get things done.
[01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:50.000]  I like to get –
[01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:51.000]  Okay, well let me –
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:53.000]  I like to make an amendment through Heller.
[01:12:53.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  I like to screw over Obamacare with the lobby, Hobby Lobby decision.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:09.000]  Great, but how many of you guys in your position are out here teaching people that are not attorneys exactly what the intricacies of the bullcrap that's being done to them are?
[01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:13.000]  How many of you are out here educating the public on this?
[01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  I've tried to do that by giving some enlightenment to some of your listeners through the YouTube comments.
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  And they call me every name, but –
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:29.000]  Well, if you keep using words like collectivist and the –
[01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:33.000]  you know, instead of the individual, I'm pretty sure it's going to be true.
[01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  Because like I said, I completely disagree that we have rights as a society or as a collection.
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:39.000]  We don't.
[01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  Every right is an individual right.
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  The only thing that we can choose to do together in exercising those rights is to work toward a common goal.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  But that doesn't give – that isn't collective rights.
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  That's a collective action.
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:13:58.000]  No, that goes under consent of the governed.
[01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:06.000]  We as a people, we the people, gave up some of our rights and our consent to be governed.
[01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  We didn't want chaos.
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:11.000]  We didn't want every man for himself.
[01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:16.000]  All right, where's your signature on the Declaration and the Constitution?
[01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:18.000]  Mine's not there.
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  My grandparents' isn't there.
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:22.000]  My great-grandparents' isn't there.
[01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:25.000]  They were all in this country, but they didn't sign it.
[01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  What's your solution?
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  Education, as always.
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:33.000]  You've given a lot of problems out there.
[01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:38.000]  Now, I want – and problems and talking and pointing out problems is real easy.
[01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:41.000]  Accomplishing things are a little bit more difficult.
[01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:44.000]  So what is your solution?
[01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:47.000]  My solution, as I've been trying to say, is education,
[01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:51.000]  to get people to understand how the system is rigged against them and who did it.
[01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  And there's no question of who did it.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  What?
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:56.000]  You're failing.
[01:14:56.000 --> 01:14:57.000]  Well, no kidding I'm failing.
[01:14:57.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  I don't have the platform big enough that the primetime media does to fool everybody with
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  and the public school system has to indoctrinate them with.
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  I have a very small outreach compared to what that system's got in place.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  But the fact of the matter is, how many – wait a minute, wait a minute,
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:17.000]  how many people read the court opinions that you're a part of?
[01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  Hell, most of them can't even understand them or what they're even about.
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  So if you're trying to facilitate change through mass education, you're failing just as much.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  So the point here is, which one of us is going directly to the people that can make a change
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  regardless of how the system wants to play?
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:36.000]  Because let's face facts.
[01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  If we go into a court where the jury is educated and knows what the court is trying to do
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  and what all the players in that body are trying to do, they're not going to let it happen.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:54.000]  They're going to say, no, not today, you're not going to play that card.
[01:15:54.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  I know that doesn't apply here.
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  You're trying to commit fraud against this person.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:15:59.000]  I agree.
[01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  We don't disagree, Eddie.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  Okay, well you're asking me what I'm trying to do.
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  That's what I'm trying to do.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:07.000]  I am trying to educate people.
[01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  There's no such word as trying.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  You either succeed or fail.
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:14.000]  But anyway, let me just tell you some of the things that are coming down the pike.
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:19.000]  We're going to have, especially if a Democrat gets in the White House,
[01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  we're going to have a Supreme Court to where you're going to see the freedom of religion is under attack.
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:31.000]  And we are already, many of us, already preparing for that battle.
[01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  Well, freedom of everything is under attack.
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:37.000]  Well, I'm telling you, it's what's coming directly.
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:40.000]  Okay, all right, well hang on, Juan, we've got one more break.
[01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  And then after this, if you don't mind, I hate to cut this short because this is getting interesting.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  But I've got other callers.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  Hopefully they need some help, and I want to get to them before we're done.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:54.000]  So I'll take you again when we get back on the other side and finish it up, okay?
[01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:55.000]  I understand, totally.
[01:16:55.000 --> 01:16:57.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back.
[01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  You all hang in there.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:08.000]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network on top of the on-air talent,
[01:17:08.000 --> 01:17:11.000]  producers and other hardworking individuals working behind the scenes?
[01:17:11.000 --> 01:17:15.000]  Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you.
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  And we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year on our annual fundraisers,
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:23.000]  which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  First prize being a Spiked Skull Lower Receiver.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:37.000]  Second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:50.000]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser.
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:55.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  and to donate to keep Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:11.000]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  In a world where natural fruits have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:36.000]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor,
[01:18:36.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:47.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:58.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  Order now.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:25.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  Thank you.
[01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:14.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:20.000]  All right, we still are talking with Juan, and we're going to wrap this up so I can try to get to the other callers.
[01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:23.000]  All right, let's go ahead and see what we can finish up on here.
[01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:28.000]  And I understand, you and I are not in complete disagreement about everything.
[01:20:28.000 --> 01:20:29.000]  So I accept that.
[01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:31.000]  I got no issues with that.
[01:20:31.000 --> 01:20:37.000]  But the areas where we are differing is in the idea that we have collective or societal rights.
[01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:39.000]  I disagree with that.
[01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  And the idea that I'm not trying to accomplish something for the greater good is that I'm not looking at the people as a whole,
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  because let me explain my aspect of that real, real quick.
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:56.000]  I have given up a very lucrative career as a computer consultant that used to travel all over the place making a good deal of money.
[01:20:56.000 --> 01:20:59.000]  I used to have my own business making a good deal of money.
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:11.000]  And I had to go against the state alone with no legal education of any kind and watch them tear my business apart illegally,
[01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:20.000]  which I didn't realize until later when I became proficient at dissecting and understanding the statutes that bound them to what they were doing
[01:21:20.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  and that they were doing illegally.
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  So yeah, you and I may have the same goal, but we don't have the same road to travel to get there.
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  You've got avenues you have access to that I do not.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:38.000]  I have to do the best I can with what I have.
[01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  Right now that is this platform.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:44.000]  That platform is about to hopefully grow exponentially.
[01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:46.000]  But at the moment, this is it.
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:54.000]  I was invited to a larger platform when I went on Infowars and did that video presentation that you first e-mailed me about.
[01:21:54.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  So while we disagree on some aspects of what overall freedom, liberty, and the people are,
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  I am at this point beginning to see that perhaps our goals are not dissimilar, but we don't get to travel the same road to get to them.
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:16.000]  Well, I tell you what, Eddie, you keep fighting your fight.
[01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:22.000]  I wish you could do it with just a little bit less anger because I see how it affects the people you are reaching.
[01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  But you continue and do your education.
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  You sound exactly like I did 45 years ago.
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:44.000]  And I just decided that I could probably affect better change, protect more rights on a broader sense for more people doing it the way I chose.
[01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  And I will continue to fight the fight.
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:55.000]  I will continue to fight the other side that are trying to restrict our rights and to turn us into a country that we weren't meant to be.
[01:22:55.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  I'll do that and I'll continue to do that.
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:06.000]  And I wish you the best of luck in your endeavors, but I just see a lot of anger coming out of your people.
[01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  And the anger is good.
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  Don't get me wrong, but it doesn't get things accomplished.
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:22.000]  I see a lot of people looking at the YouTube videos that go into court and try this and they get screwed over and they fumble and they don't say the right things
[01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:26.000]  and they end up in more trouble and spending more time than they should.
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:27.000]  That's correct.
[01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:40.000]  That's why I got out of it because I saw I was creating more problems for my fellow individuals than I was really creating things for them and protecting for them.
[01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:43.000]  And that's the only reason I got out of it.
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:47.000]  Yeah, and the thing about it is the people that I help really can't afford attorneys.
[01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:51.000]  And they're not getting assigned an attorney like they should be when they're being charged with a crime.
[01:23:51.000 --> 01:24:01.000]  Because here in Texas, the Constitution and the code is very clear that when you're charged with a crime, you have to be given counsel if you can't afford it.
[01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  But they don't do it.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  They just flat don't do it.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  The reason you hear that anger from these people is because there's a law you need to challenge and change them.
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:12.000]  Well, that's exactly what we're doing.
[01:24:12.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  But the problem is who are we going to get to do it?
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  Most of the attorneys that would actually do something the right way will be the ones that get disbarred for it.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  Because they actually I know some of them that have done it.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:28.000]  They have challenged the courts.
[01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:29.000]  Go ahead.
[01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  You challenge that law is unconstitutional.
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:35.000]  You may have to take it all the way up to the Supreme Court.
[01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  It takes work.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:37.000]  I agree.
[01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  I'm not disagreeing with that at all.
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  I'm very aware of that.
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:47.000]  Yeah, you have the intellect. I can tell you have the intellect to do it yourself.
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:49.000]  And I'm working on that, too.
[01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  But like everything else, it still takes money.
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  Intellect alone won't get me there.
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  Well, no, you can do it without being an attorney.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:24:58.000]  No, no, no.
[01:24:58.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  I'm not saying an attorney.
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  I'm saying money.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  Even with the intellect, without the ability to pay for some of it and do the things outside of the courts and have the money to fund it, it doesn't do me any good.
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:13.000]  I only declare indigency for certain things, but not everything.
[01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:17.000]  Funds is a big deal here to get that far.
[01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  And I'm working on that as well.
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:24.000]  If you do it yourself, it doesn't take money because I did it before I became an attorney.
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  I went all the way up to federal district court.
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  Before I was an attorney, I practiced in front of federal judges on different issues.
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:36.000]  I got it up there and it didn't cost anything.
[01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  You can do it.
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  I'm telling you.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  When was this?
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:44.000]  1970.
[01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:46.000]  Bingo.
[01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  They have gone hell in a handbasket here to prevent you from getting into these courts without money.
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  You go down, even with an indigency waiver by the court, you have every Tom, Dick, and Harry in the process demanding you pay for what they're providing.
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  When it involves the court system...
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  Let me tell you what, Eddie. If you will email me the statutes and things that you're talking about,
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  I would be more than happy to research and do whatever I can to help you fight that one particular statute you're talking about,
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  about where you have to have an attorney.
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:30.000]  I'll be willing to fight any of those issues, help you with it in any way I can.
[01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:39.000]  Article 1, Section 10, 2.04 and 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and 1.05 Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  I'm sorry, 2.04 and 2.05 is their duties.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  I'll email it to you.
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:55.000]  I'm an old guy and my memory's not so great, so if you'll email it to me, I'll certainly research it for you and give you some pointers on it.
[01:26:55.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  People aren't happy to do that.
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:00.000]  I may very well take you up on that.
[01:27:00.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  Do it. I'm here for you.
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  All right. I appreciate it.
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  Thank you very much for calling in and for willing to have this discussion.
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  You bet. Thank you so much.
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:11.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  All right, folks. At least I'll be happy to say it.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  He sounds like, in all in all and overall, a very good guy.
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:24.000]  Don't get me wrong. As a person, he sounds like a great individual.
[01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  I've never seen his work directly.
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:29.000]  He says he helped participate in these cases.
[01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  I'm willing to take that at face value and say, okay, no problem there.
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:42.000]  And I'm very appreciative of the offer he just gave as far as going after this unconstitutional application of misapplication of statute and violation of rights in the process.
[01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:44.000]  So I may very well take him up on that.
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:52.000]  In the meantime, let's start with the callers we got because I've got about a half an hour to get through what we have and only two minutes left in this segment.
[01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:55.000]  So Kent in Wisconsin, get us started.
[01:27:55.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  I'm going to cut you off in about a minute and a half.
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  Take a break and come back.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:02.000]  Okay.
[01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  Pleasure to talk with you.
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:11.000]  I have downloaded much of your information and your videos.
[01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  And I was stopped the other day and got caught flat footed.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  So I'm putting together a letter.
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:24.000]  My question- Whoa, whoa, whoa, a letter to who for what?
[01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  I'm putting together a letter to the judge and district attorney in my county.
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:33.000]  Okay.
[01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:34.000]  All right.
[01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  To do what?
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:29:02.000]  Well, I know I just heard you say that I shouldn't be talking about my right to travel, but I'm talking about my right to travel at the same time I'm bringing in the information that I'm not involved in the transportation code and they're using those statutes against me.
[01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:03.000]  Okay.
[01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:04.000]  Hang on just a second.
[01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:15.000]  Now this goes to something that Juan was saying there a second ago, the attorney, and it goes to this when he's talking about people not doing things the way they're supposed to be doing them because they don't know the process.
[01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:20.000]  First and foremost, have you studied the Wisconsin statutes on this issue?
[01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  I have not.
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:28.000]  Have you studied the original legislative enactment on which those statutes are based?
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:29.000]  I have not.
[01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  Then you're already at a serious disadvantage regardless of what you write.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  Hang on just a minute and we'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio with your host Eddie Craig.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  We got a half an hour left in this show, three people on the board, and the off chance that I can handle everybody and still have one or two slots to go.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  If you got anything to talk about, now's the time to get in line.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  We'll be right back after this break.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:02.000]  Would you like to be more attractive?
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:05.000]  A quick clothing change could do the trick.
[01:30:05.000 --> 01:30:08.000]  Researchers say it could be as simple as choosing the right color.
[01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment to tell you more.
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:19.000]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:20.000]  That's creepy.
[01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:36.000]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:39.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:44.000]  Lady in red.
[01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:47.000]  You might remember that 1980s hit song.
[01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:51.000]  Chris Deberg crooned about how his lady never looked so lovely, but he was puzzled.
[01:30:51.000 --> 01:30:54.000]  What change that made her so irresistible?
[01:30:54.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  It was her new red dress.
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  Researchers proved that red makes women more desirable to men.
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  In one study, men viewed a picture of a moderately attractive lady dressed in red.
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:07.000]  A second group of men viewed that same lady dressed in blue.
[01:31:07.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  The results?
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  Red revved things up.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:13.000]  Men wanted to flirt with and sit much closer to the lady in red.
[01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  So ladies, if you want to attract a man or light the fire in your special guy, wear red.
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:20.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:30.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  Trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out of town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  Me and I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:12.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:31.000]  Yeah.
[01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:49.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:52.000]  Now, let's get back to Kent in Washington here.
[01:33:52.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  All right, Kent, let's continue on.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  Wisconsin.
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:56.000]  Oh, I'm sorry, Wisconsin.
[01:33:56.000 --> 01:33:57.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:33:57.000 --> 01:33:59.000]  All right, let's go back to what you were saying here.
[01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:05.000]  If you haven't studied any of this, then how do you know what argument it is you're trying to make?
[01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:06.000]  So you have to understand.
[01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  I have tried to make people understand this time and time again.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:14.000]  My material is specifically written to the statutes in Texas.
[01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  Now, most states share a common theme in writing to their statutes since there's basically a standardized statutory method of writing across the entire country.
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  The thing is, is not every state wrote it down in exactly the same language.
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:41.000]  So you've got to study them individually and see if they match or if they don't match.
[01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  All right?
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  Where they do match, the same argument might be possible depending upon what is different in other places.
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  So when you go in trying to make these arguments and you do not have the ability to connect the statutory and underlying enactment dots, so to speak,
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:11.000]  you're not going to have the picture you need to argue with, and you're not going to get them to see it when you make the argument.
[01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  It's like trying to point out the constellations to a blind man.
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:20.000]  Okay?
[01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  So the point here is if you're going to do something like this, do it after you've gotten yourself educated on it, not before.
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  All right?
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:38.000]  I wouldn't expect you to walk into a circus sideshow with the sword swallower and jump up on stage and see if you could do what he'd do.
[01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:40.000]  That part Juan had right.
[01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:45.000]  Too many people are jumping into this without preparing and training for it.
[01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  And I tell people not to do that.
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  It's one thing to stand up for your rights.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  It's another thing to pick a fight you cannot possibly win because you don't have a clue how to fight.
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  So if you haven't done any of the reading and the studying, you are at a serious disadvantage going in.
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:07.000]  And I'm assuming your time to do so is fairly short.
[01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  Am I right?
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:10.000]  Correct.
[01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  Okay.
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:19.000]  So how prepared do you think you're going to get with all this between now and that time?
[01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  Hard telling.
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  Exactly.
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  So now my question to you is how can I help you?
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:51.000]  Okay. Well, the question I have now is in your videos, you talk about driver and driver is a term used in transportation code.
[01:36:51.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  Ours is called a transportation code.
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:36:58.000]  For all I know in Wisconsin, it's called the ice cream making code.
[01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  I don't know what it is in Wisconsin.
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  I believe it's a transportation code also.
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  Okay. Does the Wisconsin code have a definition for transportation in it?
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:13.000]  Texas does not.
[01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  That's why we get to go find the correct one.
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:19.000]  But does Wisconsin?
[01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  Yeah, I don't know.
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:31.000]  Then how do you know it means the same thing statutorily speaking as what I'm talking about here?
[01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:35.000]  I'm not even sure if I know what statutory means.
[01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:47.000]  The code, the little black and white letters written in the code, the statutes, the stuff enacted by or at least approved by the legislature.
[01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:48.000]  Okay.
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  The statutes, for all intents and purposes, the statutes are the agency, whatever agency is given authority over that section of statutes,
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  it's an agency interpretation sometimes called a regulation of the underlying law.
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  It's not the law itself.
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  That is the actual bill that the legislature enacted and the governor signed.
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:14.000]  That's the law.
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:22.000]  The statute is some agency interpretation of that law.
[01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  You follow?
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  I'm not so sure.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  Okay.
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:29.000]  See, you're already at a disadvantage.
[01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  If you don't even know what a statute is, how are you going to make an argument in a courtroom?
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  If you don't know what a law is and where to find it, how are you going to make a legal argument in a courtroom?
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  I'm trying to stay out of the courtroom.
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:49.000]  Now, you're not going to do that unless you can figure out some way to make them drop the charges or dismiss the case beforehand.
[01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:54.000]  And the only way you're going to do that is give them a damn good reason.
[01:38:54.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  And that means that your legal argument or their jurisdiction needs to be either nonexistent in the jurisdiction case or your facts and evidence better than theirs.
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:20.000]  The problem is is you don't have enough information to make either argument.
[01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:22.000]  Say it to me again.
[01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  I said the problem is is that you don't have enough information to make either of those arguments.
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  They lack jurisdiction because or they have no legal authority or you couldn't have violated the statute because of A, B, C, or D.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:50.000]  You don't know how to make either one of those arguments because you don't know what they're using to make the allegation.
[01:39:50.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  Well, as it stands right now, I need to know is without using the word driver or operator, what word would I use to describe myself while I was traveling?
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  Traveler, private individual, non-operator, non-driver.
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  There's lots of things you can use, but you're still trying to do what?
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:28.000]  Make an argument of right to travel.
[01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  That's where you're still trying to go with this, right?
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  Yes.
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  Okay.
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:39.000]  Let me put it to you a different way.
[01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  Let me explain to you once again why that argument will not work.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  Okay?
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:48.000]  Okay.
[01:40:48.000 --> 01:40:59.000]  I'm charging you with armed robbery of a convenience store and using a motor vehicle to flee the scene of the crime after the robbery.
[01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  Are you going to come into court and make an argument of right to travel because you used the car to get away from the scene and therefore none of the charges matter?
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  Okay.
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:23.000]  Because they're not charging you with anything to do with a right to travel.
[01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  They are charging you with violating a legal duty under a regulatory statute.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  The problem is, is they are not providing all the necessary elements to show that you were engaging in the activity being regulated.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  For instance, how could you be engaged in armed robbery when you were in a hospital at the time
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:56.000]  and you were actually undergoing surgery at the time?
[01:41:56.000 --> 01:41:59.000]  See, the argument isn't I have a right to travel.
[01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:05.000]  The argument is I couldn't have possibly done A because I was not doing A.
[01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:07.000]  I was actually over here.
[01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:09.000]  Pretty much what I'm telling them.
[01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:12.000]  No, it's not what you're telling them.
[01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:19.000]  In other words, unless you're telling me that you got a ticket for something and you were not even in the car when they wrote it.
[01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:26.000]  Is that what you're telling me?
[01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:27.000]  No.
[01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  Then that ain't the argument you're making.
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  You're trying to say I was doing B instead of A even though everything I was doing looks exactly like A.
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:50.000]  The problem is they're not accusing you of anything involving B. They're accusing you only of A.
[01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  It's not a correct argument.
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:53.000]  You're not going to get anywhere with that.
[01:42:53.000 --> 01:42:54.000]  I'm telling you up front.
[01:42:54.000 --> 01:42:57.000]  You use it, great, but you're not going to get anywhere.
[01:42:57.000 --> 01:43:04.000]  And if you don't go to court after you use it, they're going to issue a warrant for you.
[01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:15.000]  In Wisconsin, I got another question. Are these offenses or are these civil infractions that you've been charged with?
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  Something else you don't know, right?
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  Correct.
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:19.000]  Okay.
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:22.000]  Those require two completely different sets of rules.
[01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:25.000]  You realize this, right?
[01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:26.000]  No.
[01:43:26.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  Well, they do.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  So if you haven't done so, go to my blog, tauoflaw.wordpress.com, and type civil infractions up there in the search field and read the articles that come up on that.
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  Okay?
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  See why there's a difference.
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  But you need to find out what they are in Wisconsin because you're not going to have a clue what you're doing when you go in there if you don't.
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[01:44:24.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:44:56.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:45:24.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  We're done with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:22.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:22.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  All right, now just real quick, also going back to something that Juan, the attorney that I had on here earlier, was talking about about angry people.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:41.000]  There is a reason these people are angry that I teach this to and learn about it, and the reason is because they have finally learned to recognize the fraud.
[01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  They're angry because they've been defrauded. They're angry because they go into these courts, they know exactly what the rules are,
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  and then they watch the courts and the prosecutors ignore those rules so they can commit more fraud and steal money.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  The system being unjust in every respect at these lower-level courts especially is what has these people angry.
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:19.000]  They're angry because now they know. They're angry because I have shown them in black and white exactly what they needed to know to understand that.
[01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  I've had people that were real big on, no, man, that ain't right. They can do this. It's what they're supposed to do.
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:32.000]  That's exactly how they ought to do it, and then show them the statute and says, no, it's not, and they're like, oh, wow, you mean they lied?
[01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:40.000]  They took my money and blah, blah, blah? Yeah, they did. Oh, well, now I'm angry. Oh, well, big surprise, and that's the way it's working.
[01:47:40.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  People with no money are being defrauded in these courts and stripped of income that they need to survive because the prosecutors in the courts are using fraud to steal from them
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:48:10.000]  and have been doing so for decades. Why wouldn't you be angry? Why aren't more people angry that the IRS is defrauding 99.9% of the people in America with an income tax they don't freaking owe?
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:20.000]  Yeah, they're angry, and it's about time they got angry because they know where the roots are that are causing the corruption we're talking about.
[01:48:20.000 --> 01:48:29.000]  And even though you personally may feel that you are not involved in it and that you're not one of those, and I'm not willing to say that you completely are,
[01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:42.000]  the fact is you're still treading water in a cesspool, period. They are angry about it. They're tired of having that cesspool in their midst, and I cannot blame them.
[01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:57.000]  Yes, I'm angry, too. I'm angry because I have given up everything I can to help people fight this, to learn how to fight this, to learn exactly why they should learn how to fight this.
[01:48:57.000 --> 01:49:11.000]  And I agree not everyone is capable. Not everyone can go into court and do it. But I'll be damned if I'm going to let somebody that wants to fight for themselves stand by and fail without crying.
[01:49:11.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  I may not go in there and do it for them, even though I should be able to go in there and do it for them, just like any attorney, but the fact of the matter is the system protects itself in that regard, too.
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:33.000]  I'm not bound by the same rules the rest of you guys are in certain ways. I can't lose the bar card and be disbarred from being there. You guys can.
[01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:44.000]  So y'all have to kowtow in ways I necessarily don't. But yeah, people are angry for that reason. They're not angry because I'm motivating them to be angry.
[01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:59.000]  They're angry because they can finally see what's being done to them. That's the difference. I'm not creating angry people. I am exposing the facts to them that gets them angry.
[01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:06.000]  Why would that be wrong? Why would giving them the truth be wrong?
[01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:12.000]  All right. That being said, let's get on with this. Matthew in Texas, what do you got?
[01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:14.000]  Hey, Eddie, how you doing?
[01:50:14.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  Doing all right.
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  Oh, that guy, that guy, Juan, was a joke, man. I don't know.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:24.000]  I know. Be kind. If he's doing everything he said he was doing, then more power to him.
[01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  A lot of what he was saying was contradicting itself. You don't join the mafia and try to turn it into a charitable organization.
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:35.000]  You don't join the Bar Association and then try to say that you're not one of them.
[01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  I mean, that'd be like me putting on a Texan jersey, lining up on the line and playing for them, but then saying I'm really for the other team.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:50.000]  It doesn't make any sense with whoever. He's not a spy, and he's not affecting change the way you are.
[01:50:50.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  I'm not going to sit here and try to like toot your horn and stuff, but I mean, I've been to your classes.
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:01.000]  I got your seminar and all that. You've done far more to change anything than this guy's ever done in his career.
[01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:07.000]  So whatever. Anyway, that being said, I'm not falling about that. I was also disappointed that—
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  No, I did not pay for that endorsement, Juan, just so you know.
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:21.000]  Yeah, right. And I was surprised that he wasn't trying to even make an argument. He was just trying to—he didn't even try to say like,
[01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:29.000]  well, the courts are corrupt, and this is the reason why, and he's just trying to save face, I guess.
[01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:36.000]  In a lot of ways, yes. It looked far more like an attempt at justification than explanation.
[01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  Yeah, I agree. So I don't want to use up a bunch of time like the last caller did.
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:46.000]  I'm sorry, the guy from Michigan, Minnesota, but wow, he really needs to research before he calls.
[01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  So here's my thing. I did everything as well as I possibly could with traffic stop.
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:58.000]  You know, didn't give the license, didn't give the insurance, all that good stuff. This happened like in 2014.
[01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:03.000]  I showed up. I filed pre-trial motions, special appearance and all that stuff.
[01:52:03.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  I don't remember exactly what I filed. I'll have to get my hands on the paperwork on the court case.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:16.000]  So I went to one hearing for both cases that I had at the same court.
[01:52:16.000 --> 01:52:17.000]  Right.
[01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  That's all that ever happened with that. It just disappeared, like went off the books. I don't know what happened.
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:29.000]  I never heard back from them. So then all of a sudden I get this letter in the mail saying my license could be suspended if I don't pay the fine.
[01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  Is it from an attorney's office?
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:34.000]  No, it was from DPS.
[01:52:34.000 --> 01:52:42.000]  You sure it's from DPS? You look at the fine print, look over that thing real careful.
[01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:45.000]  Be very sure about that.
[01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:51.000]  Because there are some attorney's firms in Texas right now that are acting as if they are specific Texas agencies
[01:52:51.000 --> 01:52:58.000]  in the attempt to collect outstanding court debts for cases that have never even been adjudicated.
[01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:04.000]  They are once again committing fraud in the name of the state to take money out of people's pockets,
[01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  even when something goes beyond the statute of limitations. It's total fraud.
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:12.000]  Go ahead.
[01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:15.000]  Sorry. No surprise there, but this is what happens next, right?
[01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:21.000]  So after I get this letter, I don't know, a few weeks down the line, which was the letter I received was this year,
[01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  and then there was a knock at my door. It's the constable trying to serve an arrest warrant.
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:33.000]  For what exactly? I don't know, probably a capious warrant because I didn't suppose to show up to court for these two specific cases.
[01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:39.000]  And then after that, I didn't answer the door, of course, because who's going to answer the door when the police are knocking?
[01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  If they want to get in, they'll get in, you know, they'll make their way in.
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  So anyway, they send me a summons.
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:57.000]  I now have two trials by jury for the exact two same cases that supposedly were already, you know, fines were levied against me,
[01:53:57.000 --> 01:54:04.000]  meaning that the decision was made, then a warrant was put out for my arrest for not showing up to court, and now I have trial date.
[01:54:04.000 --> 01:54:12.000]  So my question is, should I file a motion to dismiss for lack of speedy trial, something along those lines?
[01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:19.000]  Well, the problem is, is you don't, when you first went in, did they have a signed complaint?
[01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:23.000]  I, it's like two years ago, I'm pretty sure they didn't.
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  Okay, don't be pretty sure. We need to know whether or not a complaint existed because that affects the speedy trial timeline.
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:34.000]  That's true, because it doesn't happen until their complaint is filed.
[01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  Correct. They have up to two years to file the complaint. Now the thing that does not stop is the statute of limitations.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:50.000]  They've got two years to file and prosecute. If they don't make it, they're done.
[01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:54.000]  Meaning the trial has to begin two years after the initial...
[01:54:54.000 --> 01:54:57.000]  Within two years.
[01:54:57.000 --> 01:54:58.000]  Okay.
[01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:05.000]  They have to file the complaint and begin the trial within the two-year statute of limitations.
[01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:06.000]  Okay?
[01:55:06.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  Now, the other problem here is, is we need to get our hands on this so-called warrant.
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:16.000]  If they issued a capias, they would have to issue it on the grounds that they, that you didn't show up in court,
[01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  for which they would have to have something in the record proving that you were served.
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:22.000]  Exactly.
[01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:24.000]  Well, they're not going to have it.
[01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:31.000]  Even if they've got a copy of something in there they say they put in the mail, there is no proof of receipt unless they got it signed for.
[01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:34.000]  Now, the statute says that they don't have to have that.
[01:55:34.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  The problem is that's a violation of the right to notice under due process.
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:45.000]  That means they could say they mailed it, never have mailed it, and then issue a warrant.
[01:55:45.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  Now, were the charges against you all Class Cs?
[01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:51.000]  Yeah, it's just too speedy.
[01:55:51.000 --> 01:55:59.000]  Okay, here's the other problem, there is no authority in Texas law to issue a warrant for a Class C.
[01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:10.000]  When you read 15.17G, when you read 14.06B and C, when you read 27.14D, every one of them says exactly the same thing.
[01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:17.000]  In the case of a fine-only offense, if the individual does not appear in compliance with the citation,
[01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:24.000]  the only authority the court has is to seek a complaint, not a capious warrant.
[01:56:24.000 --> 01:56:28.000]  So it's basically bumped it up to a different charge and they have to...
[01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:31.000]  No, no, no, it doesn't bump anything.
[01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:37.000]  The only thing they can do is get a complaint for the original charges on the citation.
[01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  There is nothing in there for them to charge you with failure to appear, nothing.
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:45.000]  Yeah, okay.
[01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:48.000]  That's exactly why they can't issue a warrant for it,
[01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:53.000]  because there is no additional charge they can make that would authorize the warrant.
[01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:58.000]  There is no authority to issue a warrant for the original charges.
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:03.000]  Everything says all they can do is get a proper complaint.
[01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:05.000]  That's it.
[01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:06.000]  Yeah.
[01:57:06.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  Once they have that, they can send you a summons to appear, but they can't send a warrant.
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  Okay.
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:19.000]  Well, I'll get a...
[01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  I don't want to walk in there with a supposed active warrant and then ask for my record,
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:25.000]  because that sounds...
[01:57:25.000 --> 01:57:26.000]  Send someone else.
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:28.000]  Send someone else.
[01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  Anyone can access the court record for a case.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:35.000]  It is a 100% public record.
[01:57:35.000 --> 01:57:36.000]  Yeah.
[01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:40.000]  Chapter 2001 government code says very clear...
[01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:42.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:43.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:57:43.000 --> 01:57:46.000]  The Open Records Act 552 government code says very clearly
[01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:51.000]  that the court records for adjudicated files are 100% public.
[01:57:51.000 --> 01:57:52.000]  All right.
[01:57:52.000 --> 01:57:53.000]  Well, I'll take care of that,
[01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:58.000]  and I'm going to wrap up in one of your classes before my trial.
[01:57:58.000 --> 01:57:59.000]  All right.
[01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:03.000]  Well, Mark, I appreciate you calling in, Matthew, and I'll see you in class.
[01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:05.000]  All right, Mark in Florida.
[01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:06.000]  Raider, I'm sorry.
[01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  I was not able to get to you guys before the end of the show.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  I appreciate you calling in.
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  Please give us a call back Thursday or Friday if you need something or email me.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  Otherwise, give me a call back next Monday night.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  Juan, thank you so much for calling in and us having that conversation.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  I appreciate the offer, and I'll be getting in touch with you via email
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  at the very first available opportunity I have.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:28.000]  All right, folks.
[01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  It has been a great night tonight, I think.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  I hope all of you are pleased with the show.
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  Please keep us in your financial prayers and well-being for us
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:38.000]  as well as for yourselves.
[01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:39.000]  Y'all have a great week.
[01:58:39.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  Good night, and God bless.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:55.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible
[01:58:55.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:02.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:06.000]  what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God
[01:59:06.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:26.000]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  plus charts and maps, and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:36.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:36.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:49.000]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.000 --> 01:59:57.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.