[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000] The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily [00:06.000 --> 00:13.000] bulletins for the commodity market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop [00:13.000 --> 00:19.000] into the tides of the alternative. [00:19.000 --> 00:26.000] Markets for Friday, the 22nd of July, 2016, are currently trending with gold at $1,321.70 [00:26.000 --> 00:34.000] an ounce, silver $19.61 an ounce, Texas crude $44.75 a barrel, and Bitcoin is leveling out [00:34.000 --> 00:42.000] at $654 U.S. currency. [00:42.000 --> 00:48.000] Today in history, the year 1946, a Zionist underground organization, the Irgun, bombs [00:48.000 --> 00:53.000] the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, the site of the civil administration and military headquarters [00:53.000 --> 00:57.000] for mandatory Palestine, resulting in 91 deaths. [00:57.000 --> 01:01.000] Though the Irgun was described as a terrorist organization by the United Nations, the British, [01:01.000 --> 01:05.000] and the United States governments, and in the media at large, certain segments of the [01:05.000 --> 01:09.000] Zionist community believed that any action taken in the cause of the creation of a Jewish [01:09.000 --> 01:15.000] state was justified, including terrorism, like that of the King David Hotel bombing, [01:15.000 --> 01:20.000] today in history. [01:20.000 --> 01:24.000] In recent news, a Texas woman was forcibly placed in the general population at a county [01:24.000 --> 01:28.000] jail for no legitimate reason, where she was attacked by an inmate, denied medication, [01:28.000 --> 01:30.000] and punched in the face by a guard. [01:30.000 --> 01:31.000] Her crime? [01:31.000 --> 01:35.000] Being a victim of rape, she was jailed nearly a month because prosecutors were concerned [01:35.000 --> 01:39.000] that she would not return to testify against her rapist after having a mental breakdown [01:39.000 --> 01:40.000] on the stand. [01:40.000 --> 01:44.000] She is now suing the Terrace County District Attorney's Office, county officials, and jail [01:44.000 --> 01:45.000] employees. [01:45.000 --> 01:48.000] Apparently the problem was that this woman began testifying in December against the man [01:48.000 --> 01:51.000] she had been choked, beaten, and raped by two years earlier. [01:51.000 --> 01:55.000] However, due to her bipolar disorder, she was unable to finish her testimony and was [01:55.000 --> 01:58.000] sent to the St. Joseph's Medical Center for 10 days. [01:58.000 --> 02:02.000] With absolutely no follow-up after she was released from the hospital, she was handcuffed, [02:02.000 --> 02:04.000] arrested, and sent to jail on December 18th. [02:04.000 --> 02:08.000] The judge ordered to have her locked up until a trial resumed, even though she was not charged [02:08.000 --> 02:09.000] with any crime. [02:09.000 --> 02:13.000] In a video statement from the Harris County District Attorney, Devon Anderson, by the [02:13.000 --> 02:18.000] Harris County District Attorney's Office, she says that, quote, if nothing was done [02:18.000 --> 02:21.000] to prevent the victim from leaving Harris County in the middle of the trial, a serial [02:21.000 --> 02:26.000] rapist would have gone free and her life would have been at risk while homeless on the street. [02:26.000 --> 02:30.000] However, while the woman's lawyer did acknowledge that the woman had said that she might not [02:30.000 --> 02:35.000] testify again while she was having a mental breakdown, he did stress that county officials [02:35.000 --> 02:39.000] still did not have the legal right to detain her since she lived outside of Harris County [02:39.000 --> 02:43.000] in an apartment in Longview, Texas, and had not been subpoenaed. [03:09.000 --> 03:24.000] Really, man, come on, six o'clock news, say somebody's been shot, somebody's been [03:24.000 --> 03:31.000] viewed, somebody blew up a building, somebody stole their car, somebody got away, somebody [03:31.000 --> 03:39.000] got away, they didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far. [03:39.000 --> 03:46.000] Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day, son, a man had to answer for the weed that he [03:46.000 --> 03:53.000] dug, take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them, that boy [03:53.000 --> 04:01.000] was laying on Mayan Street for all the people to see. [04:01.000 --> 04:06.000] And just as there's one thing you should always find, you've got to settle up before [04:06.000 --> 04:09.000] you've got to draw a hard line. [04:09.000 --> 04:15.000] When the guns won't settle, we'll sing a victory tune and we'll haul me back at the [04:15.000 --> 04:17.000] local zoo. [04:17.000 --> 04:25.000] We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing, let's get for my man, bear for my [04:25.000 --> 04:33.000] horses. [04:33.000 --> 04:37.000] Alright, folks, good evening. [04:37.000 --> 04:41.000] This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig. [04:41.000 --> 04:46.000] It is, what is the date today, the 25th of July. [04:46.000 --> 04:51.000] Well, we're coming up to the end of another month in this year and things are still not [04:51.000 --> 04:57.000] improving, which brings me to several of tonight's beginning subjects here. [04:57.000 --> 04:59.000] Let's look at a couple things. [04:59.000 --> 05:06.000] There's been a lot of stories here recently about the federal government taking over land [05:06.000 --> 05:08.000] within the states. [05:08.000 --> 05:13.000] The Bundy issue, I mean, just all over the place. [05:13.000 --> 05:14.000] It's not just one. [05:14.000 --> 05:20.000] This gentleman that built the stockponds on his place, Mr. Joe Robertson up in Montana [05:20.000 --> 05:27.000] and many other people, where the Bureau of Land Management, which is a federal agency, [05:27.000 --> 05:37.000] is harassing, removing people from property, claiming that it's federal property, and then [05:37.000 --> 05:42.000] imprisoning and charging people for things that they do on that property. [05:42.000 --> 05:46.000] But here is the problem, in case you didn't know. [05:46.000 --> 05:52.000] The fact is that the federal government has zero authority within the territorial borders [05:52.000 --> 05:59.000] of the several states of the union, especially over any land within that union. [05:59.000 --> 06:05.000] The only way the federal government has any authority over a piece of land that is within [06:05.000 --> 06:15.000] a state is if that state has sold or by session given that land to the federal government, [06:15.000 --> 06:20.000] in which case there will be an official public record that that is now the case and that [06:20.000 --> 06:22.000] that land no longer belongs to that state. [06:22.000 --> 06:27.000] And the county land office or the state land office will have a record of that to show [06:27.000 --> 06:30.000] that that is the case. [06:30.000 --> 06:35.000] Well, it is not the case in any of the cases that we currently know about. [06:35.000 --> 06:37.000] It's not in the Bundy case. [06:37.000 --> 06:39.000] It is not in Mr. Robertson's case. [06:39.000 --> 06:41.000] It's not in any of them. [06:41.000 --> 06:46.000] Now, let's ask ourselves this question first and foremost. [06:46.000 --> 06:51.000] And anytime you're dealing with government, you should be asking yourself a lot of questions. [06:51.000 --> 06:57.000] Anytime you hear a narrative put out by the government, you should be asking yourself [06:57.000 --> 06:59.000] at least this question. [06:59.000 --> 07:05.000] And the question always comes down to by what authority? [07:05.000 --> 07:10.000] Now, the specific question that we have here in relation to these interstate land grabs [07:10.000 --> 07:17.000] or the intrastate land grabs is what are the constitutional limits placed upon federal [07:17.000 --> 07:22.000] authority over land, especially when that land is within the individual states of the [07:22.000 --> 07:23.000] union? [07:23.000 --> 07:25.000] That's our question. [07:25.000 --> 07:29.000] So in order to understand that, we have to go to the federal constitution to see what [07:29.000 --> 07:33.000] authority the federal government was given when it comes to land. [07:33.000 --> 07:35.000] Okay? [07:35.000 --> 07:41.000] The place where we find that is in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the federal [07:41.000 --> 07:42.000] constitution. [07:42.000 --> 07:50.000] And it reads thusly, to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such [07:50.000 --> 07:57.000] district not exceeding 10 miles square as may by cession of particular states and the [07:57.000 --> 08:03.000] acceptance of Congress become the seat of the government of the United States. [08:03.000 --> 08:07.000] Now, we'll stop there for a second before we continue and explain that part of it. [08:07.000 --> 08:13.000] That is what is currently considered to be Washington, D.C., the seat of government. [08:13.000 --> 08:19.000] That is the area that is not to exceed 10 miles square and for which the land seeded [08:19.000 --> 08:24.000] by whatever states decided to do so or had the authority to do so, which in this case [08:24.000 --> 08:27.000] was Maryland and Virginia. [08:27.000 --> 08:29.000] Okay? [08:29.000 --> 08:33.000] That's where D.C. got its land. [08:33.000 --> 08:37.000] And so here we are now with the seat of government. [08:37.000 --> 08:43.000] That's one piece of land over which the constitution gives them absolute legislative [08:43.000 --> 08:44.000] authority. [08:44.000 --> 08:46.000] Okay? [08:46.000 --> 08:49.000] Now, let's continue. [08:49.000 --> 08:58.000] And to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature [08:58.000 --> 09:02.000] of the state in which the same shall be. [09:02.000 --> 09:07.000] Now, let's stop there and understand that phrase. [09:07.000 --> 09:16.000] Where it says in which the same shall be, it's talking about the purchased land. [09:16.000 --> 09:23.000] The legislature within the state from which the land is purchased, okay, must consent [09:23.000 --> 09:25.000] to the purchase. [09:25.000 --> 09:32.000] And the federal government must purchase it. [09:32.000 --> 09:42.000] And these are the specific uses which the constitution authorizes them to get land for. [09:42.000 --> 09:54.000] For the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings. [09:54.000 --> 09:56.000] Okay? [09:56.000 --> 10:05.000] Land management of state land is nowhere in this authority. [10:05.000 --> 10:07.000] Nowhere. [10:07.000 --> 10:11.000] There is no authority here that would have allowed Teddy Roosevelt to establish national [10:11.000 --> 10:15.000] parks on lands that belong to the several states of the union. [10:15.000 --> 10:18.000] There simply isn't. [10:18.000 --> 10:24.000] Roosevelt's declaration of creating state parks within states on their land under federal [10:24.000 --> 10:27.000] management was absolutely unconstitutional. [10:27.000 --> 10:33.000] I'm not saying it was a bad idea for what it was intended for. [10:33.000 --> 10:39.000] But without them purchasing that property from the state and turning it into something [10:39.000 --> 10:43.000] the federal government had authority over, he had none. [10:43.000 --> 10:51.000] The other problem is, is that it does not fit within the declared uses that they are given here. [10:51.000 --> 10:58.000] There's no authority in this for making a state park or national park. [10:58.000 --> 11:02.000] None. [11:02.000 --> 11:06.000] So while Teddy Roosevelt may have done a lot of great things, Teddy Roosevelt, like most [11:06.000 --> 11:13.000] presidents before him and definitely those after him, didn't follow the limits of his [11:13.000 --> 11:19.000] constitutional authority and stay within it. [11:19.000 --> 11:22.000] Most of them haven't. [11:22.000 --> 11:30.000] All of them, since Andrew Jackson has done something to violate the Constitution while [11:30.000 --> 11:33.000] they were in office. [11:33.000 --> 11:36.000] Every last one of them. [11:36.000 --> 11:40.000] If you can find one that hasn't, I'd like to hear that. [11:40.000 --> 11:44.000] But the fact of the matter is, there's no authority for it. [11:44.000 --> 11:51.000] So there is no authority for the federal government to be charging the bundies for any [11:51.000 --> 11:59.000] criminal acts on their own ranch or up at the BLM location where everybody wound up in jail. [11:59.000 --> 12:02.000] Because it's not federal land. [12:02.000 --> 12:07.000] The federal government has zero jurisdiction there. [12:07.000 --> 12:14.000] So let me explain you in relation to this discussion what the three things we learned from Article 1, [12:14.000 --> 12:17.000] Section 8, Clause 17 actually are. [12:17.000 --> 12:22.000] One, that the lands upon which D.C. is built as a seat of government is lands that are [12:22.000 --> 12:28.000] ceded or sold by the states to the United States for that particular purpose. [12:28.000 --> 12:35.000] Two, that any other land acquired and governed over by the United States must come to the [12:35.000 --> 12:41.000] United States by one of the same two mechanisms, session or purchase from the legislature of [12:41.000 --> 12:44.000] the particular state in which the land is located. [12:44.000 --> 12:46.000] That doesn't happen. [12:46.000 --> 12:48.000] There's no authority and no jurisdiction. [12:48.000 --> 12:54.000] And every federal employee on that land trying to tell somebody living within that state [12:54.000 --> 13:05.000] or visiting that state what they can and cannot do on that land is an illegal trespasser. [13:05.000 --> 13:13.000] Number three, the only constitutionally valid uses of such land other than that land used [13:13.000 --> 13:20.000] to create Washington, D.C., is to be used for the express purposes that that article [13:20.000 --> 13:25.000] tells us, which is the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other [13:25.000 --> 13:27.000] needful buildings. [13:27.000 --> 13:31.000] They can't use it for anything else. [13:31.000 --> 13:36.000] So these federal land grabs are absolutely unconstitutional. [13:36.000 --> 13:42.000] Why the governments within an individual state claim that they can't do anything to stop [13:42.000 --> 13:48.000] it is beyond me unless they're in on it. [13:48.000 --> 13:53.000] They stand to gain by allowing the federal government and its bureaucracies to seize [13:53.000 --> 13:58.000] control of this land so that those people that we put in Congress can make sweetheart [13:58.000 --> 14:08.000] deals to enrich themselves while they're still in office and for when they get out of office, [14:08.000 --> 14:13.000] when they start getting these huge contracts and grants or positions with these entities [14:13.000 --> 14:17.000] to which they sell this stolen land. [14:17.000 --> 14:22.000] That's what Harry Reid was trying to do with that part of Nevada on the Bundy Ranch. [14:22.000 --> 14:32.000] He was trying to make a big deal with a foreign corporation to put in a power company. [14:32.000 --> 14:39.000] You think for one second he was not going to be lining his own pockets over that deal? [14:39.000 --> 14:43.000] And that all of those that were doing everything within their legislative and congressional [14:43.000 --> 14:56.000] power and backroom dealing power to help him get that done were not going to be doing the same? [14:56.000 --> 15:04.000] Now let's fast forward to the death knell of America to the 2016 elections. [15:04.000 --> 15:14.000] And let's talk a little bit about some of the stuff that at the conventions as they're going on have been discovered. [15:14.000 --> 15:26.000] Debbie Washerman Scheister Crap Pile, whatever her real name is, as chairman of the DNC has been caught [15:26.000 --> 15:36.000] through hacked emails that show that they were intentionally rigging the entire Democratic Party process [15:36.000 --> 15:44.000] and the DNC to undermine every candidate but Hillary Clinton. [15:44.000 --> 15:58.000] And as soon as this woman gets caught, Hillary Clinton moves her up from that position into a position in her campaign. [15:58.000 --> 16:05.000] Basically saying, I appreciate all the underhanded, dirty dealing, backstabbing things you were willing to do [16:05.000 --> 16:17.000] to help me steal the office of president so much so that I am going to just reward you as a spit in everyone's face [16:17.000 --> 16:25.000] by promoting you to my campaign and waving you in front of everybody that's sitting here pointing fingers at you right now. [16:25.000 --> 16:36.000] And together when I get into office, I will make sure that all of them pay dearly for trying to prevent you from stealing that office for me. [16:36.000 --> 16:40.000] And you're sitting at home not batting an eye about this, why? [16:40.000 --> 16:43.000] And if you are saying something, who are you saying it to? [16:43.000 --> 16:51.000] Is it just to your friends and family where it's not going to do any good or are you getting in the face of somebody that's going to matter? [16:51.000 --> 16:56.000] All right folks, we're going to take a break. We'll be right back after these messages, so y'all hang in there. [17:21.000 --> 17:24.000] Lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air. [17:24.000 --> 17:27.000] Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution. [17:27.000 --> 17:32.000] Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks. [17:32.000 --> 17:35.000] First prize being a Spikes Skull Lower Receiver. [17:35.000 --> 17:37.000] Second prize being a Taurus Curve. [17:37.000 --> 17:39.000] Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor. [17:39.000 --> 17:45.000] And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud. [17:45.000 --> 17:50.000] Donations by all major credit cards are accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin. [17:50.000 --> 17:52.000] The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser. [17:52.000 --> 17:58.000] Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air. [18:00.000 --> 18:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses? [18:05.000 --> 18:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [18:09.000 --> 18:14.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. [18:14.000 --> 18:20.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. [18:20.000 --> 18:24.000] What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons. [18:24.000 --> 18:26.000] How to answer letters and phone calls. [18:26.000 --> 18:28.000] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [18:28.000 --> 18:33.000] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:33.000 --> 18:38.000] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:38.000 --> 18:40.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:40.000 --> 18:49.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [18:49.000 --> 18:59.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [19:01.000 --> 19:04.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. [19:04.000 --> 19:08.000] Logosradionetwork.com. [19:08.000 --> 19:10.000] Here we go. [19:38.000 --> 19:46.000] Hi, folks. [19:46.000 --> 19:47.000] We are back. [19:47.000 --> 19:54.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984. [19:54.000 --> 19:57.000] And I'm going to start taking your calls here in just a minute. [19:57.000 --> 20:00.000] But I just want to finish up on this. [20:00.000 --> 20:18.000] Now, folks, we are experiencing so much blatant disregard for what this country was built to achieve by those who wish to undermine it for their own personal profit and gain [20:18.000 --> 20:35.000] that I'm astounded we're not up in arms, literally up in arms, and hanging everybody with a political asphyxiation or fixation in their actions. [20:35.000 --> 20:38.000] I mean, it's ridiculous. [20:38.000 --> 20:46.000] Point your finger at a bureaucrat that respects your rights over his codebook. [20:46.000 --> 20:59.000] Point your finger at a legislator that respects your rights and his limits in how he votes and writes laws. [20:59.000 --> 21:20.000] Point your finger at anybody on Capitol Hill that has always denied any bill his vote if it did not follow the constitutional principles established by the Founding Fathers. [21:20.000 --> 21:26.000] I only know of one, and he's not up there anymore. [21:26.000 --> 21:29.000] Okay? [21:29.000 --> 21:32.000] I can understand why his hair turned white at whatever age it did. [21:32.000 --> 21:41.000] But, geez Louise, anybody under that kind of stress to try to protect what's right and the thanks he got for it, I can't really say I'm surprised by that. [21:41.000 --> 21:47.000] I don't know if I would have been able to last as long as Ron Paul did in that office. [21:47.000 --> 21:56.000] But even Rand Paul hasn't gone the full mile that his father did in relation to this. [21:56.000 --> 22:09.000] And every time I've watched and listened to people throw their support behind a candidate, that candidate has proven to be exactly what they all are, self-serving. [22:09.000 --> 22:11.000] Okay? [22:11.000 --> 22:18.000] Ted Cruz, everybody loved Ted Cruz, and then he gets up at the Republican National Convention and turns into a petulant child. [22:18.000 --> 22:25.000] That was no surprise to me, never was going to be a surprise to me. [22:25.000 --> 22:28.000] And I say the same thing about Trump being elected or anything else. [22:28.000 --> 22:31.000] He may try to do the right thing the right way. [22:31.000 --> 22:35.000] If he does, he's going the way of JFK, bet on it. [22:35.000 --> 22:43.000] If he doesn't, well, that's not unexpected for me either. [22:43.000 --> 22:52.000] I really, really believe you're spitting in the wind here when you vote for any of these people that have their name on a ballot anymore. [22:52.000 --> 23:01.000] Because those that are going to do the right thing know they won't survive being in office and they're not there. [23:01.000 --> 23:12.000] Because it's dangerous to be the sole voice in a crowd speaking against the will of the crowd. [23:12.000 --> 23:24.000] But we've got people that are willing to do it, but nobody pays any attention to them until it's too late, if ever. [23:24.000 --> 23:26.000] So what are we going to do about where we are? [23:26.000 --> 23:28.000] What are we going to do about what we have? [23:28.000 --> 23:32.000] What are we going to do about what we're getting? [23:32.000 --> 23:38.000] Because we're not getting what we deserve, we're not getting what's right, and we're not, well, maybe we are getting what we deserve. [23:38.000 --> 23:40.000] Let's backtrack that. [23:40.000 --> 23:49.000] At least the way we currently treat our responsibilities as individual sovereign people to rule ourselves, yeah, [23:49.000 --> 23:56.000] we deserve what we're getting because we're not doing that correctly either. [23:56.000 --> 24:07.000] Folks, get interested, get gone, or get your chains all shined up and oiled. [24:07.000 --> 24:12.000] And I hope you wear them well. [24:12.000 --> 24:25.000] Because if you keep standing still saying and doing nothing, they will be placed upon you and they will be locked. [24:25.000 --> 24:29.000] You need to figure out what America is really worth to you. [24:29.000 --> 24:33.000] You need to figure out what you're willing to do to keep it. [24:33.000 --> 24:48.000] How far are you willing to go to do what is actually right, to keep what is actually right, and to protect it from those that would destroy it? [24:48.000 --> 24:50.000] It's amazing, isn't it? [24:50.000 --> 24:57.000] Most people would have no problem, they wouldn't enjoy it, don't get me wrong, but they wouldn't have a problem with shooting an intruder [24:57.000 --> 25:00.000] that came into their house in the middle of the night and tried to rob them. [25:00.000 --> 25:04.000] They wouldn't have any problem with that whatsoever. [25:04.000 --> 25:22.000] But when that same intruder sits in a building in a nice office, anywhere from one mile to 3,000 miles away, but is doing you just as much harm if not more so, [25:22.000 --> 25:28.000] nobody will lift a finger to stop it. [25:28.000 --> 25:30.000] Now, why is that? [25:30.000 --> 25:35.000] Is it the distance that separates the mental state from the harm being caused? [25:35.000 --> 25:39.000] Just because you can't see the perpetrator, you don't feel the harm? [25:39.000 --> 25:41.000] You ought to know better than that. [25:41.000 --> 25:45.000] You've been feeling the harm for decades now. [25:45.000 --> 25:56.000] You lose 30-plus percent of your livelihood to theft by government, and that's just what the federal government takes. [25:56.000 --> 26:04.000] Then you lose even more than that to your local governments. [26:04.000 --> 26:12.000] And you wonder why your standard of living is below the poverty line. [26:12.000 --> 26:18.000] You wonder why it's hard to send a kid to college, why it's hard to pay the bills and make ends meet. [26:18.000 --> 26:30.000] Well, believe me, that person that broke into your house is far less dangerous and will steal far less from you than that person in that nice office, [26:30.000 --> 26:43.000] X number of miles away, and they will do it with nothing more than a pen. [26:43.000 --> 26:48.000] Even when they have no authority to do it. [26:48.000 --> 26:55.000] I said this in class yesterday, and I'm going to say it to you folks once again, because I've said it on here as well many times. [26:55.000 --> 27:02.000] The only way we take this country back without bloodshed is at the local level. [27:02.000 --> 27:11.000] The local level simply means when your representative for the state legislature or any other office local to you comes to town, [27:11.000 --> 27:16.000] you make darn sure that you've got a town hall meeting scheduled. [27:16.000 --> 27:27.000] You make darn sure that they know that you demand that they appear and listen to what you've got to say. [27:27.000 --> 27:31.000] And then what you say to them is very simple. [27:31.000 --> 27:37.000] You own X business in X town, in X district. [27:37.000 --> 27:44.000] We are going to petition those people to stop doing business with you. [27:44.000 --> 27:48.000] We're going to make you destitute. [27:48.000 --> 27:59.000] And the reason we're going to do this to you and destroy your livelihood is because of what you do to allow ours to be destroyed. [27:59.000 --> 28:02.000] Because you're not living up to your oath. [28:02.000 --> 28:05.000] You're not watching out for our interest. [28:05.000 --> 28:10.000] You're watching out for the statist interest and your own. [28:10.000 --> 28:17.000] Well, now you're going to pay the price for serving yourself instead of us. [28:17.000 --> 28:22.000] You put them out of business when they don't listen. [28:22.000 --> 28:26.000] Stop frequenting places they own. [28:26.000 --> 28:32.000] Don't do business with businesses for which they work if they don't own one of their own. [28:32.000 --> 28:36.000] I'm sorry, you employ this guy who is a state rep or is a state rep. [28:36.000 --> 28:37.000] No, sorry. [28:37.000 --> 28:39.000] Can't do business with you. [28:39.000 --> 28:41.000] Okay. [28:41.000 --> 28:45.000] Can't do business with you. [28:45.000 --> 28:52.000] That's the only way we're going to get rid of the people that are doing what they're doing. [28:52.000 --> 28:59.000] And hopefully get in those that will do the right thing because they don't want to take that risk of being ruined. [28:59.000 --> 29:02.000] And they're going to do their best to do things right is the hope. [29:02.000 --> 29:05.000] And when they don't, we do the same thing right back to them. [29:05.000 --> 29:12.000] But the thing about it is is what we really need is teeth in our state constitutions to back all of that up. [29:12.000 --> 29:18.000] Sure, we have the right to abolish our government and reform it any time and in any way we see fit. [29:18.000 --> 29:20.000] But how many of us does that require? [29:20.000 --> 29:22.000] The Constitution doesn't say. [29:22.000 --> 29:31.000] The Constitution doesn't say that the people can form their own anything in order to go after a public official that is corrupt and not doing their job properly. [29:31.000 --> 29:40.000] We know we can, but they use the guns to prevent that from happening because they say the Constitution gave them that power and not us. [29:40.000 --> 29:41.000] Now, it's bogus. [29:41.000 --> 29:43.000] We know that, but it's what they do. [29:43.000 --> 29:50.000] We need to start thinking, people, instead of just sitting back and watching the leaves fall where they may. [29:50.000 --> 29:51.000] Okay? [29:51.000 --> 29:56.000] All right, folks, I'll start taking calls when I get back, 512-646-1984. [29:56.000 --> 30:02.000] Y'all hang in there. [30:02.000 --> 30:04.000] Take a whiff of that. [30:04.000 --> 30:08.000] Onions may have a scrambling for breath mints, but they might also save our lives. [30:08.000 --> 30:09.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [30:09.000 --> 30:15.000] I'll be back in just a moment with some reasons to spice up your food with the power of onions. [30:15.000 --> 30:17.000] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.000 --> 30:20.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:20.000 --> 30:25.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [30:25.000 --> 30:30.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [30:30.000 --> 30:33.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.000 --> 30:40.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:40.000 --> 30:44.000] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.000 --> 30:46.000] An onion a day could keep the doctor away. [30:46.000 --> 30:51.000] Common onions are brimming with antioxidants that help fend off serious health problems. [30:51.000 --> 30:55.000] Studies have shown these chemicals can help protect against deadly cancers. [30:55.000 --> 31:00.000] They're also associated with a reduced risk of heart disease, diabetes, and cataracts. [31:00.000 --> 31:02.000] But not all onions are created equal. [31:02.000 --> 31:09.000] Cornell University researchers say strong-flavored varieties have the highest antioxidant and cancer-protective properties. [31:09.000 --> 31:13.000] Those include the Western Yellow, the New York Bold, and Northern Red varieties. [31:13.000 --> 31:17.000] While mild and sweet onions like the Vidalia may be yummy, [31:17.000 --> 31:22.000] they contain fewer health-boosting chemicals and offer little protection against cancer. [31:22.000 --> 31:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.000 --> 31:38.000] What are you thinking? Microplant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month. [31:38.000 --> 31:45.000] FUSA.org has 12 formulations of microplant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidney, liver, [31:45.000 --> 31:48.000] blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever. [31:48.000 --> 31:52.000] It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products. [31:52.000 --> 31:55.000] That saves you space, time, and money. [31:55.000 --> 32:01.000] Call 888-910-4367 only at FUSA.org. [32:01.000 --> 32:05.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [32:05.000 --> 32:10.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [32:10.000 --> 32:13.000] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:13.000 --> 32:17.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, [32:17.000 --> 32:20.000] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:20.000 --> 32:25.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:25.000 --> 32:28.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:28.000 --> 32:33.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is [32:33.000 --> 32:35.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:35.000 --> 32:40.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:40.000 --> 32:45.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [32:45.000 --> 32:50.000] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:50.000 --> 32:54.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:54.000 --> 33:02.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:02.000 --> 33:07.000] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:33.000 --> 33:35.000] All right, folks, we are back. [33:35.000 --> 33:42.000] This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig, and the call-in number is 512-646-1984. [33:42.000 --> 33:48.000] And right now we are going to be talking with, I hope, since I don't have a call screen tonight, guys, listen carefully. [33:48.000 --> 33:50.000] If you're going to call in, call into the number. [33:50.000 --> 33:53.000] Just remember, keep the language clean. [33:53.000 --> 34:01.000] Don't be on a speakerphone, preferably not on a handset kind of phone, a wireless phone, so on and so forth, [34:01.000 --> 34:06.000] unless the cell phone is all you've got, but try to be somewhere where there's not a lot of background noise. [34:06.000 --> 34:09.000] And if you've got a radio in the background where you're listening to the show or a computer, [34:09.000 --> 34:12.000] be sure to turn the speakers down, okay? [34:12.000 --> 34:16.000] All right, that being said, let's go to Richard Wright. [34:16.000 --> 34:20.000] Richard, is that you? [34:20.000 --> 34:21.000] How are you doing, Eddie? [34:21.000 --> 34:23.000] I'm good. How are you? [34:23.000 --> 34:25.000] Pretty good, pretty good. [34:25.000 --> 34:31.000] I was calling to prepare myself for some... [34:31.000 --> 34:34.000] Prepare or compare? [34:34.000 --> 34:35.000] Prepare. [34:35.000 --> 34:37.000] Okay. [34:37.000 --> 34:39.000] Be prepared to go to court. [34:39.000 --> 34:40.000] All right. [34:40.000 --> 34:46.000] For some reason, some strange reason, during the follow-up, before I get on the phone with you, [34:46.000 --> 34:52.000] I'd like to, you know, have everything in front of me and, you know, just in case you ask me any questions, [34:52.000 --> 34:58.000] but I don't have a court date, and I'm supposed to have a court date, and on one of my tickets, [34:58.000 --> 35:03.000] the officer wrote an appearance to a court date on there, and when I went to check the ticket [35:03.000 --> 35:07.000] and there's two citations he gave me, it's not even in the record. [35:07.000 --> 35:09.000] So I'm baffled by that. [35:09.000 --> 35:10.000] Okay, wait a minute. [35:10.000 --> 35:20.000] What does your copy of the citation say as far as when you're supposed to appear? [35:20.000 --> 35:27.000] It says the date he wrote now is... [35:27.000 --> 35:31.000] Now, why does that sound like it was crumpled up? [35:31.000 --> 35:34.000] It was, it was folded. [35:34.000 --> 35:37.000] 816, that's what he wrote on there. [35:37.000 --> 35:38.000] Okay. [35:38.000 --> 35:41.000] And it's supposed to be for In Valley Lighting. [35:41.000 --> 35:42.000] Now... [35:42.000 --> 35:45.000] Okay, you realize that's next month, right? [35:45.000 --> 35:46.000] Yeah, of course, but... [35:46.000 --> 35:47.000] Okay. [35:47.000 --> 35:51.000] I'm expecting the ticket at least to show up in the clerk of courts. [35:51.000 --> 35:52.000] When was the ticket issued? [35:52.000 --> 35:57.000] The 5th, 7-11. [35:57.000 --> 36:00.000] Okay, and they still don't have a copy of it? [36:00.000 --> 36:03.000] That's weird, right? [36:03.000 --> 36:05.000] That depends. [36:05.000 --> 36:10.000] Well, that's strange, so I can't even pull that up in the clerk of courts in this broad [36:10.000 --> 36:12.000] county here in Florida. [36:12.000 --> 36:17.000] But, however, let me just give you the rundown, and you can still probably guide me. [36:17.000 --> 36:18.000] And I know it's about... [36:18.000 --> 36:21.000] My question is going to be about entry and motion. [36:21.000 --> 36:26.000] So, first of all, this police officer basically harassed me. [36:26.000 --> 36:27.000] He followed me. [36:27.000 --> 36:32.000] And the moment he said I was about to pull in the gas station, he decided to pull me [36:32.000 --> 36:33.000] over. [36:33.000 --> 36:34.000] And his claim to pull me over... [36:34.000 --> 36:35.000] It's nighttime, by the way. [36:35.000 --> 36:39.000] And his claim to pull me over was my dark tint. [36:39.000 --> 36:45.000] But the problem was, or is, the car I was driving was not my vehicle. [36:45.000 --> 36:47.000] So I told him... [36:47.000 --> 36:49.000] That's really not relevant. [36:49.000 --> 36:57.000] Okay, it may not be relevant, but I told him that this is not my vehicle, so he proceeded [36:57.000 --> 36:59.000] to want to give me a ticket for the tint. [36:59.000 --> 37:03.000] I don't understand if I borrowed somebody's car, how I was responsible for the tint. [37:03.000 --> 37:06.000] Well, because you're the one that took it out on the road. [37:06.000 --> 37:10.000] So it's my job to take off the tint? [37:10.000 --> 37:11.000] No. [37:11.000 --> 37:15.000] It's your job to make sure that a car that you take on the road, if you're going to be [37:15.000 --> 37:19.000] engaging in transportation, which if you keep saying the word vehicle, they're going to [37:19.000 --> 37:21.000] assume you are. [37:21.000 --> 37:23.000] Okay, correct. [37:23.000 --> 37:24.000] Personal convenience. [37:24.000 --> 37:26.000] Let me say personal convenience. [37:26.000 --> 37:37.000] However, so in that process of him using that as an excuse to apprehend my license... [37:37.000 --> 37:40.000] What do you mean apprehend your license? [37:40.000 --> 37:45.000] He requested to have my license, the license and registration. [37:45.000 --> 37:48.000] So I gave it to him. [37:48.000 --> 37:53.000] And with the thought process, thinking that everything was clear, like I didn't have any [37:53.000 --> 37:54.000] issues. [37:54.000 --> 37:58.000] So he come back and say, I can't give you your license because it's invalid. [37:58.000 --> 38:03.000] So I give you a ticket for an invalid license and also the tint. [38:03.000 --> 38:04.000] Now... [38:04.000 --> 38:05.000] Wait a minute. [38:05.000 --> 38:06.000] Okay, wait a minute. [38:06.000 --> 38:07.000] Wait a minute. [38:07.000 --> 38:09.000] Your license is invalid. [38:09.000 --> 38:10.000] Why? [38:10.000 --> 38:12.000] That's what I'm getting to right now. [38:12.000 --> 38:13.000] Okay. [38:13.000 --> 38:14.000] I didn't know. [38:14.000 --> 38:19.000] I didn't know because I didn't receive any previous tickets from the law enforcement. [38:19.000 --> 38:21.000] So I said, well, let me find out why. [38:21.000 --> 38:25.000] Right away when I got home at that moment, I went online to check. [38:25.000 --> 38:32.000] It was for a red light camera ticket, which I didn't know I had that out there. [38:32.000 --> 38:34.000] So I went to... [38:34.000 --> 38:36.000] And this one is in Miami. [38:36.000 --> 38:38.000] The ticket I received was in Broward County. [38:38.000 --> 38:40.000] The red light ticket was in Miami. [38:40.000 --> 38:45.000] So I went to the courthouse the next day to Miami because I know the process. [38:45.000 --> 38:49.000] If you fight it, they got to release your license. [38:49.000 --> 38:52.000] So I said, I want to fight this ticket. [38:52.000 --> 39:00.000] So they allowed me to make my license valid again, which I did. [39:00.000 --> 39:06.000] Does Florida law allow them to invalidate your license for a red light camera ticket? [39:06.000 --> 39:08.000] I was looking all over that. [39:08.000 --> 39:09.000] I can't... [39:09.000 --> 39:10.000] I don't know. [39:10.000 --> 39:15.000] I just know that the red light camera is under the code. [39:15.000 --> 39:25.000] I got to look at the code, it's 316 something that, you know, they have it there saying that they can give you a ticket. [39:25.000 --> 39:28.000] But however, I've seen plenty, two cases. [39:28.000 --> 39:35.000] I've seen one in Broward County and one in Miami that the judge said that it's illegal. [39:35.000 --> 39:39.000] The red light camera is or? [39:39.000 --> 39:42.000] The red light camera is illegal. [39:42.000 --> 39:46.000] Yeah, but you got to understand why he said it's illegal. [39:46.000 --> 39:49.000] That may not be a blanket statement. [39:49.000 --> 39:50.000] Okay. [39:50.000 --> 39:51.000] Correct. Correct. [39:51.000 --> 39:54.000] So, but my question has nothing to do with that. [39:54.000 --> 40:03.000] My question is, what does the statute say that the punitive actions they can take are? [40:03.000 --> 40:14.000] In other words, if the statute does not authorize them to suspend a license for a red light camera ticket, then why are they doing it? [40:14.000 --> 40:17.000] By what authority are they doing it? [40:17.000 --> 40:19.000] Et cetera, et cetera. [40:19.000 --> 40:24.000] Correct. Correct. Yeah. [40:24.000 --> 40:28.000] Like I said, I looked up the code and I read it and... [40:28.000 --> 40:35.000] Well, obviously you haven't read it enough because you're not looking for what I'm telling you to look for. [40:35.000 --> 40:37.000] Find out. [40:37.000 --> 40:48.000] Because you may be able to sue somebody just because you got that ticket, just because you had your license suspended, because it was illegal for them to do it. [40:48.000 --> 40:51.000] Correct. Correct. Okay. [40:51.000 --> 40:56.000] All right. I searched for things like that, so I'm trying to find a way. Where can I find it? [40:56.000 --> 41:09.000] Well, don't search. If you found the statute that deals with red light cameras, all you need to do is a red light photo device, whatever terminology they use in the statute, that's what you search for. [41:09.000 --> 41:15.000] Look for the descriptor of the subject, which is the red light camera. [41:15.000 --> 41:20.000] But they usually say something like photo enforcement device or something of that nature. [41:20.000 --> 41:25.000] Take whatever that verbiage is and that's what you use to search. [41:25.000 --> 41:33.000] You find every code where that specific identifier exists, and those are what you read. [41:33.000 --> 41:36.000] And correct. And I found it. And I read it. And it didn't... [41:36.000 --> 41:41.000] Wait a minute. How many did you find? [41:41.000 --> 41:42.000] How many what? Repeat. [41:42.000 --> 41:50.000] How many different statutory references did you find where that nomenclature exists? [41:50.000 --> 41:53.000] I found one. But it has... [41:53.000 --> 41:58.000] Did you only look in one code or did you look across all your codes? [41:58.000 --> 42:04.000] It has the code, but it's got A, B, and C. You know, it's got the letters underneath the code. [42:04.000 --> 42:08.000] Okay. Wait. You're not understanding my question. [42:08.000 --> 42:10.000] Okay. I'm not understanding. [42:10.000 --> 42:18.000] Here in Texas, we have a separate code for everything, an occupations code, an insurance code, a transportation code, et cetera, et cetera. [42:18.000 --> 42:25.000] Now, in Florida and a lot of other states, it's all one great big code divided up into chapters, if I'm not mistaken, right? Or titles. [42:25.000 --> 42:26.000] Correct. [42:26.000 --> 42:27.000] Okay. [42:27.000 --> 42:28.000] Correct. [42:28.000 --> 42:43.000] When you do a search on the Internet through that legislative set of codes, do you restrict your search to the entire code or to a specific title of that code? [42:43.000 --> 42:50.000] The entire code. The entire code is 316.0083. [42:50.000 --> 43:00.000] No, that's the specific number of the statute in question. I'm talking about the whole damn book. [43:00.000 --> 43:04.000] Oh, title. I think it's title 30. [43:04.000 --> 43:20.000] Right. When you do a search on the legislative website, do you tell it to search the whole thing as in every single title in that code or do you tell it to look only within a specific title? [43:20.000 --> 43:28.000] Oh, okay. Only within the code. I didn't look at the title. Entire title. [43:28.000 --> 43:34.000] Okay. My point is that they can be referenced in more than one place, okay? [43:34.000 --> 43:43.000] For instance, red light cameras may be listed in a different code simply because of what it relates to under that code. [43:43.000 --> 43:47.000] And there may be something there about what kind of actions they can take. [43:47.000 --> 43:55.000] For instance, it may be listed under the local government code or the state government code under the agency that's involved. [43:55.000 --> 44:00.000] Hang on just a second. We'll pick this up on the other side. [44:25.000 --> 44:52.000] Okay. [44:52.000 --> 45:03.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [45:03.000 --> 45:19.000] Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas behind Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [45:23.000 --> 45:31.000] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [45:31.000 --> 45:44.000] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com. [45:44.000 --> 45:48.000] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products. [45:48.000 --> 46:15.000] Naturespureorganics.com. [46:15.000 --> 46:31.000] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio and we are speaking with Richard. [46:31.000 --> 46:36.000] All right, Richard. Okay, anyway, the point I'm getting at is it could be in multiple places. [46:36.000 --> 46:45.000] Now, one code I'm almost certain that is not encompassed within that one that you're searching is your state administrative code. [46:45.000 --> 47:00.000] You need to do a separate search on the administrative code to see if it makes any reference to photo enforcement as one of the programs that a particular state agency has any authority over just to be safe. [47:00.000 --> 47:14.000] Because generally speaking, even though it takes a local ordinance in most states for those cameras to be put into place, there's still a state law and a state agency that's responsible for regulating their use. [47:14.000 --> 47:35.000] Okay, got you. And actually, it's Title 23, so I looked it up. Okay, well, I was definitely looking to that, but I guess my question is this. You said that if it's not presented that they can suspend your license for something like that, who would be the party to sue? [47:35.000 --> 47:42.000] Would it be the court or the state or who? Because I guess the state is the one that suspends the license. [47:42.000 --> 47:54.000] The state would have to be the one that suspended it, yes. But then the municipality would also be liable because they're the ones that sent a fraudulent citation or notice to suspend the license. [47:54.000 --> 48:04.000] And the state agency is liable because they acted upon a fraudulent notice when they should know full well whether or not state law authorized them to take that action. [48:04.000 --> 48:14.000] And if it doesn't, and they did it, then that's criminal conspiracy. Okay. Okay, got that. Wrote that down. [48:14.000 --> 48:38.000] So now I have a, I don't have it yet, maybe an issue. I'll check for that too, but I set up a court date to fight that. So first thing first, what I should submit a motion on how these things are not legal based upon the title and the statute. That's what I should do first. [48:38.000 --> 48:46.000] Well, you have to challenge them. Do you get a jury trial in these cases with the red light camera? [48:46.000 --> 48:49.000] Well, according to you, any? [48:49.000 --> 48:56.000] No, wait a minute. Don't say according to me. I'm asking you what the rules are in the state of Florida. [48:56.000 --> 49:06.000] Are you authorized by law or are you told you are not entitled to a jury trial for a red light camera citation? [49:06.000 --> 49:23.000] I don't know that information. Okay, find out. Because if you're not, then what you have is a bill of pains and penalties under your state constitution. And those are outlawed in every state of the union. [49:23.000 --> 49:38.000] Repeat again, bills of pain and penalties. Bill of pains and penalties. They are the lower order of bills of attainder. Okay. [49:38.000 --> 49:53.000] Bills of attainder carried a sentence of death. Bills of pains and penalties carried any lesser punishment than death. That's what this would be because there is no judicial determination. [49:53.000 --> 50:00.000] If you're being charged with a crime, does your state constitution say you have a right to a jury trial in any criminal case? [50:00.000 --> 50:10.000] If you're being charged civilly and the amount is in excess of $20, the federal constitution says you have the right to demand a jury trial. [50:10.000 --> 50:18.000] So if you have neither of those available to you, what this means is this is 100% administrative. [50:18.000 --> 50:29.000] That is what makes it a bill of pains and penalties. A legislative or administrative punishment without judicial review. [50:29.000 --> 50:40.000] Perfect. Well, it says infraction. It's a taste type. Okay. If it's a butt, are infractions civil or criminal under this particular thing in Florida? [50:40.000 --> 50:54.000] I'm willing to bet they're civil. They're civil. Okay. And I'm also willing to bet then that if it's civil, and that's the red light camera ticket, right? Not the other ticket. [50:54.000 --> 51:04.000] That's correct. Red light camera. Okay. All right. If they're civil, I'd almost guarantee you that the statute says they must file a lawsuit to collect. [51:04.000 --> 51:18.000] Correct. And they don't do it. They send you a bogus citation that says you got to pay it or suffer when the law really requires them to file a lawsuit to sue to collect it all. [51:18.000 --> 51:25.000] What code of law that states that they must file a lawsuit for that? [51:25.000 --> 51:33.000] Well, that would be, that's what you're looking for. That's why I know you haven't read everything or you would already know the answer to that. [51:33.000 --> 51:44.000] Okay. Perfect. Everything in that statute says what the process is for that red light camera enforcement. It says whether or not they're authorized to issue a citation. [51:44.000 --> 51:53.000] It says whether or not the only thing that citation can do is notify you of a pending lawsuit. It says whether or not they're required to file a lawsuit. [51:53.000 --> 51:59.000] It says whether or not you're entitled to an appeal. It says whether or not you can do it before a jury or not before a jury. [51:59.000 --> 52:10.000] And if it doesn't do any of those things, then it needs to be challenged on the constitutional basis of being vague, ambiguous, and overbroad. [52:10.000 --> 52:25.000] Okay. I got to reread that. Okay. So I guess after I get the information and do an investigation, then I know what kind of motion I need to file. [52:25.000 --> 52:26.000] Exactly. [52:26.000 --> 52:27.000] Okay. [52:27.000 --> 52:37.000] Yeah. If they haven't even filed the suit and the statute requires them to do that, the court's acting without any sort of jurisdiction and therefore the suspension of your license was completely illegal. [52:37.000 --> 52:45.000] There was no conviction and there was no legal authority to suspend because there was no lawsuit filed and they didn't win one. [52:45.000 --> 52:52.000] They didn't get a judgment to get the suspension if they're even authorized to get it at all. [52:52.000 --> 52:55.000] All right. So can I ask you another question? [52:55.000 --> 52:57.000] You can if you hurry. [52:57.000 --> 53:18.000] Yeah, I'll be quick. You know, I listened to you a couple of times. So I know California had a different laws in the state, but when you get pulled over, right, that's considered an arrest, correct? [53:18.000 --> 53:34.000] Here it is. And in California, it's a seizure. Okay. And in order for an officer to make a seizure, he has to have at least some reasonable suspicion that he can articulate that a crime is occurring. [53:34.000 --> 53:49.000] He has no authority to seize and detain for civil anything. He can only seize and detain for detention purposes and investigatory purposes if it is criminal that he's looking at. [53:49.000 --> 53:57.000] That's the difference in why they can't do it in California and why they couldn't do something like that in Florida if it's a civil infraction in any state. [53:57.000 --> 54:05.000] Everybody that gets pulled over or stopped or accosted by a cop for a civil infraction is having their rights violated. [54:05.000 --> 54:17.000] Doesn't matter whether the statute says it authorizes it or not. It has no authority to authorize it because it violates the search and seizure clause of every Constitution. [54:17.000 --> 54:31.000] Okay. So this would help me a lot because verbiage and wording, I know the codes would be different in different states, but what is the code for Texas so I can read yours that state that and I can try to make it... [54:31.000 --> 54:35.000] As far as states what? [54:35.000 --> 54:40.000] That you can't be arrested or seized for any civil... [54:40.000 --> 54:47.000] It's common sense, man. It's common sense. An arrest without a warrant cannot occur without probable cause. [54:47.000 --> 54:57.000] Probable cause cannot be achieved except with articulable facts of a crime that has been or is being committed. [54:57.000 --> 55:01.000] Correct. Okay. [55:01.000 --> 55:17.000] Any form of detention requires suspicion of a crime. Any form of arrest requires probable cause to believe that there are facts supporting a crime and he better be able to state what those facts are. [55:17.000 --> 55:20.000] Gotcha. Okay. [55:20.000 --> 55:37.000] All right. Well, I guess you answered my question so far. I just need to do more research and find that those questions you told me to look at the bills and pay and also search through the whole title for the information. [55:37.000 --> 55:42.000] All right. That's what I'm going to do. Thank you for your help, Eddie. You're welcome. [55:42.000 --> 55:45.000] Have a great one. All right, man. Thanks for calling in. [55:45.000 --> 55:54.000] All right. Bye-bye. All right. Now we go to Scott in Texas. Scott, what do you got? [55:54.000 --> 56:10.000] Well, I have the deal going on in Addison and I followed all the motions and everything, went through all the hoops and finally wound up having a little jury trial, which they naturally they found me guilty. [56:10.000 --> 56:21.000] But I had all my paperwork in and so then I set it up filed for an appeal and put in a paupers affidavit and the judge denied my appeal. [56:21.000 --> 56:24.000] What do you mean he denied your appeal? [56:24.000 --> 56:35.000] He denied my appeal. He said, first off, he said, oh, you didn't get your appeal in on time, which I did. Then he said- [56:35.000 --> 56:41.000] Wait, wait, wait, wait. All right. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. What day was the trial? [56:41.000 --> 56:51.000] I don't remember the date. It was right before this last holiday that we had. [56:51.000 --> 56:55.000] Okay. The last holiday was the 4th of July, Scott. [56:55.000 --> 57:07.000] So it was right before the 4th. It was a Thursday before the 4th. So during the week of the right after the 4th, it was like on a Thursday, I mailed in the appeal and- [57:07.000 --> 57:21.000] But that doesn't help if you don't know exactly what day the trial was because there's going to be a huge difference in timeframe if the trial was any day other than Friday of the previous week. [57:21.000 --> 57:31.000] If it was on Friday, then you have until the following Friday. If it was on Thursday, you have until the following Wednesday. [57:31.000 --> 57:39.000] There's a big difference here in time gap. That's why I need to know what day the trial was. [57:39.000 --> 57:47.000] Shoot. Hang on. Well, I didn't write that down because, well, I thought you had 10 working. [57:47.000 --> 58:05.000] No. That is only if it is a municipal court of record. Otherwise, you've got five. You used to have only one in a court of no record. They've changed that to five. [58:05.000 --> 58:11.000] Okay. Okay. So hang on just a second. We're going to be taking our break here and then we'll come back and hash this out on the other side. [58:11.000 --> 58:18.000] You'll have about three or four minutes to go get all your paperwork so we can get some dates down and figure out what's going on. Okay? [58:18.000 --> 58:21.000] All right. Hang on just a minute. We'll be right back. [58:21.000 --> 58:25.000] All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio Monday night show with your host, Eddie Craig. [58:25.000 --> 58:50.000] The call in number is 512-646-1984. Give us a call, get in line, and we will talk. I'll be right back after this break. [58:50.000 --> 58:58.000] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.000 --> 59:06.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [59:06.000 --> 59:18.000] Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.000 --> 59:28.000] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.000 --> 59:33.000] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.000 --> 59:51.000] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. [59:51.000 --> 01:00:00.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:19.000] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing you daily bulletins for the commodity market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [01:00:19.000 --> 01:00:42.000] Markets for Friday the 22nd of July 2016 are currently trading with gold at $1,321.70 an ounce, silver $19.61 an ounce, Texas crude $44.75 a barrel, and Bitcoin is leveling out at 654 U.S. currency. [01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:57.000] Today in history, the year 1946, a Zionist underground organization, the Irgun, bombs the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, despite of the civil administration and military headquarters for mandatory Palestine, resulting in 91 deaths. [01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:20.000] Though the Irgun was described as a terrorist organization by the United Nations, the British, and the United States governments, and in the media at large, certain segments of the Zionist community believe that any action taken in the cause of the creation of a Jewish state was justified, including terrorism, like that of the King David Hotel bombing, today in history. [01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:30.000] In recent news, a Texas woman was forcibly placed in the general population at a county jail for no legitimate reason, where she was attacked by an inmate, denied medication, and punched in the face by a guard. [01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:40.000] Her crime? Being a victim of rape, she was jailed nearly a month because prosecutors were concerned that she would not return to testify against her rapist after having a mental breakdown on the stand. [01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:52.000] She is now suing the Darius County District Attorney's Office, county officials, and jail employees. Apparently the problem was that this woman began testifying in December against the man she had been choked, beaten, and raped by two years earlier. [01:01:52.000 --> 01:02:01.000] However, due to her bipolar disorder, she was unable to finish her testimony and was sent to the St. Joseph's Medical Center for 10 days, with absolutely no follow-up after she was released from the hospital. [01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:04.000] She was handcuffed, arrested, and sent to jail on December 18. [01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:10.000] The judge ordered to have her locked up until trial resumed, even though she was not charged with any crime. [01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:17.000] In a video statement from the Harris County District Attorney, Devlin Anderson, by the Harris County District Attorney's Office, she says that, quote, [01:02:17.000 --> 01:02:27.000] if nothing was done to prevent the victim from leaving Harris County in the middle of the trial, a serial rapist would have gone free and her life would have been at risk while homeless on the street. [01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:43.000] However, while the woman's lawyer did acknowledge that the woman had said that she might not testify again while she was having a mental breakdown, he did stress that county officials still did not have the legal right to detain her since she lived outside of Harris County in an apartment in Longview, Texas, and had not been subpoenaed. [01:02:43.000 --> 01:03:00.000] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. If you have a product or a service you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257. This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for July 22, 2016. [01:03:14.000 --> 01:03:24.000] Hi, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are currently talking with Scott in Texas. All right, Scott, did you get your stuff? [01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:25.000] Oh, yeah. [01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:29.000] All right. What day was the trial? [01:03:29.000 --> 01:03:31.000] 6.30. [01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:33.000] What day of the week is that? [01:03:33.000 --> 01:03:35.000] It was on a Thursday. [01:03:35.000 --> 01:03:43.000] All right, which means your count starts the next day, Friday. Was Friday a holiday of any kind? [01:03:43.000 --> 01:03:45.000] No, Monday was. [01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:57.000] Okay. That won't matter unless that holiday or that weekend is the first day or the last day in the count. Okay? [01:03:57.000 --> 01:04:01.000] The fact that it's in the middle means nothing. [01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:18.000] So you had Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday, and your bond and everything else was required to be done, including your motion for new trial, by Tuesday. [01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:22.000] Well, that figures. [01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:25.000] Because I mailed it out on 7-11. [01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:27.000] What day of the week is that? [01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:31.000] Monday, the following after Independence Day. [01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:38.000] Okay. So in other words, the judge was right. You were more than a week late or about a week late. [01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:40.000] Well, I thought we had 10 days. [01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:52.000] No, that is not blanket. The 10 days is under Chapter 30 of the Government Code, and it applies to courts of record. Was this a court of record? [01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:53.000] Yes. [01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:55.000] You're sure? [01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:58.000] It says it right on the paper. [01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:06.000] Okay. If it says on the paper that it's a court of record, then how many days did the judge say you had? [01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:11.000] I didn't say anything. He was a real jerk. [01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:17.000] Okay. That's not my question here. He had? [01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:22.000] He didn't tell me how many days I had. [01:05:22.000 --> 01:05:26.000] You said this was June or July? [01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:32.000] The trial was June 30th, which is the last day of the month. [01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:38.000] And then, you know, you got July 4th, you know, the following Monday. [01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:47.000] And I mailed it out on the 11th, which was the Monday after, like a dummy. [01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:53.000] Well, actually, if you mailed it, let's see. [01:05:53.000 --> 01:06:09.000] If you mailed it on the 11th, you're good, if it was a court of record, because the last day, the 10th day, would have been on a Sunday, which they can't count. [01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:10.000] Okay. [01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:26.000] They cannot count the same day of trial. They cannot count a weekend or a holiday if that weekend or holiday would be the next day after the trial, be day one or the last day. [01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:31.000] It always moves to the next business day, if that's the case. [01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:36.000] So the 11th would have been your last day to get it in. [01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:39.000] Do you have proof it was postmarked then? [01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:41.000] I've sent it certified mailed. [01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:46.000] Okay, which means you have a card with that postmark date on it, right? [01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:48.000] Well, they got it on the 13th. [01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:52.000] I didn't ask when they got it. Listen to what I'm asking you. [01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:57.000] You have a card that shows you mailed it on the 11th, right? [01:06:57.000 --> 01:06:58.000] Correct. [01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:06.000] Okay. We don't give a crap when they get it. The day it's mailed is what matters. [01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:28.000] All right. So what you need to do is file a motion to reinstate, file your motion for new trial again, and file a motion to disqualify the trial judge for denying you access to the courts, denying you a fair and impartial trial, [01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:39.000] and preventing you from seeking your appeal as you are allowed to do by law and of right. [01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:44.000] Okay. Wait. Motion to reinstate and motion to what? [01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:49.000] And your motion for new trial. Did you file a motion for new trial? [01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:51.000] No, I didn't. [01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:54.000] What did you mail on the 11th? [01:07:54.000 --> 01:08:11.000] I mailed off the Pauper's report and the appeal, notice to appeal. [01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:16.000] Okay. All right. [01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:31.000] Well, they've gone on other cases like this, but I wish people would read. You are required to file two things, a motion for new trial and your notice of appeal. [01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:37.000] The notice of appeal can be done verbally the day of trial, okay, after you've lost. [01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:52.000] Say I'm inform the court that I intend to make my appeal in this case, and you can always file the written notice after the fact. However, why did you wait that long to do the informal Pauper's? [01:08:52.000 --> 01:09:02.000] Well, I just, I put it all together, but I just got busy because I'm trying to work to make a living. That's just, it's not excuse, but that's what happened. [01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:07.000] But I got it in because I thought I had plenty of time, so I thought I had 10 working days. [01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:13.000] Not working days. It is always freaking calendar days, always. [01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:17.000] Okay. Well, I didn't know that. [01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:25.000] I'm aware you didn't know it. My question is after all the times you've been to class and all the times you've heard me talk about on the show is why you didn't know it. [01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:29.000] I didn't, that part I've never heard. If I'd have known that. [01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:34.000] Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute. You're also required to do some reading, right? [01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:39.000] You know what the code of criminal procedure is. You know where to go look this stuff up. [01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:44.000] And I know I've talked about that quite often in class and here. [01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:47.000] Okay. Well, that got past me. [01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:57.000] Okay. The point here is you might can still salvage this, but you need to file those three things immediately. [01:09:57.000 --> 01:09:59.000] Okay. [01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:16.000] Okay. The last one being the motion to disqualify this judge for denying you access to the courts, denying you your right of appeal, and preventing you from getting a fair and impartial trial. [01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:21.000] Now in the seminar material, there is a motion to disqualify a judge. [01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:30.000] Please read that and please use that. [01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:34.000] And JD, I saw you up here on the board a little while ago and you dropped off. [01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:41.000] Call back in and let's talk about yours as well because you've got kind of the same issues with your stuff here and I want to talk about it if I can get to you. [01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:49.000] So call back in and get on the board. But anyway, Scott, those three things you need to get filed immediately. [01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:54.000] Yeah, because they want me to pay the fine by Friday or else he's going to put a warrant out. [01:10:54.000 --> 01:11:00.000] He can't tell you to pay the fine by Friday. He hasn't had a hearing on the indigency requirements. [01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:08.000] You can file indigency to challenge the payment of the fine just like you can to challenge the appeal. [01:11:08.000 --> 01:11:23.000] So again, he can't put you in jail for nonpayment. He can't do it. [01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:28.000] But in any case, get those filed. Get rid of this judge. [01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:37.000] Make sure that you have copies of everything he's signed that says he's going to do this, this, and this or any other paperwork they've sent you. [01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:41.000] I got copies. I got a folder that's three feet thick, it seems like. [01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:48.000] Okay. I don't care about everything in that folder. I care about the things I just said. [01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:49.000] I get you. [01:11:49.000 --> 01:12:01.000] Okay. We're going to care about everything in that folder. But right now, this is what we've got to get it handled first. [01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:07.000] Okay. Motion to reinstate, motion for new trial, motion to disqualify judge for fair and impartial trial. [01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:13.000] No, for failure to provide a fair and impartial trial, for violation of the judiciary. [01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:17.000] You'll see all of it in the motion to disqualify. Read it. [01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:18.000] I will. [01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:26.000] Okay. All right. Anything else? [01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:34.000] I don't believe that will do it. I can get that done tomorrow, and then will I hear anything or will everything just kind of stop? [01:12:34.000 --> 01:12:46.000] Well, the motion to disqualify, what I would do is file the motion to disqualify in the same court and send another copy directly to the head administrative judge of the district. [01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:56.000] And make sure to attach the copy of your motion for new trial. Your motion for new trial is going to basically state every objection you made. [01:12:56.000 --> 01:12:59.000] Do you have a copy of the transcript, by the way? [01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:01.000] No. [01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:06.000] How are you going to get the appeal from a court of record without the transcript? [01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:09.000] I didn't say anything. [01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:14.000] Wait. What do you mean you didn't say anything? [01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:21.000] Because I objected to the whole proceeding. [01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:32.000] After all the stuff we did in class on cross-examination and getting the facts into the record, you didn't say anything. [01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:35.000] So am I screwed? [01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:49.000] Well, without knowing what you said when you objected, I don't really know. But the more you keep saying, the darker the lights are getting. [01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:58.000] Well, I put everything in writing, so I thought I was just going to let the writing do all my talking because I was setting it up for appeal, and that was all. [01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:12.000] Okay. But what have I told you people time and time again about written argument versus oral argument at trial? [01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:18.000] Oral arguments are stronger? [01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:25.000] The transcript is not going to have anything about what you filed. [01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:31.000] The first thing the appeals court is going to look at is the transcript. [01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:32.000] Yeah. [01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:40.000] If you're not in there objecting when they use the deadly sins, did you do that? [01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:51.000] I didn't say anything. I objected from the beginning. I objected to the whole proceeding, and that was it. [01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:59.000] Okay. We're going to have to take that conversation offline because I'm going to need to go buy some Excedrin. [01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:06.000] All right, man. Let me talk to you about this off air, okay? [01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:07.000] That's fine. [01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:10.000] All right. I'll talk to you after a while. [01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:14.000] I know. My phone broke, and I don't have your number anymore. [01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:20.000] Well, shoot me an email, Eddie, E-D-D-I-E at ruleoflawradio.com. [01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:21.000] Okay. [01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:22.000] All right. Bye. [01:15:22.000 --> 01:15:23.000] Bye. [01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:32.000] All right. Now we're going to go to Larry in Arizona. Larry, please tell me you have better news. [01:15:32.000 --> 01:15:35.000] Well, man, mine's different this time. [01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:36.000] Okay. [01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:43.000] Transportation this time. I'm caught up as one of three defendants in a lawsuit. [01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:54.000] And in April, I got my complaint. I answered the complaint in 20 days. And last week, while the plaintiff's attorney was doing discovery, [01:15:54.000 --> 01:16:02.000] she made a little comment about the other defendants kind of placing the burden on me. [01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:13.000] So Friday, I went to the courthouse, and I pulled the file, and the other defendants have never filed an answer to the complaint. [01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:17.000] And they were due two months ago. [01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:31.000] So between her comment and between there's no answers in the file, I mean, what I'm wondering is, is the plaintiff just going after me, and can they do that legally? [01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:40.000] Well, the thing is, if they put all of you in there and joined her and separately, then any one of you can answer. [01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:45.000] And since you did, the others felt they didn't have to do anything, obviously. [01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:51.000] And that's what she meant when she made the comment, everybody's putting everything on you. You made an answer and no one else did. [01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:57.000] The question is, are they being sued individually under the same thing? But let's talk about that in a second. [01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:01.000] All right, folks, we'll be right back. [01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.000] Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks. [01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:35.000] First prize being a Spiked Skull Lower Receiver. [01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:37.000] Second prize being a Taurus Curve. [01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:39.000] 10 winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor. [01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:45.000] And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud. [01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:50.000] Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin. [01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:52.000] The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser. [01:17:52.000 --> 01:17:59.000] Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air. [01:17:59.000 --> 01:18:06.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:11.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:25.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:31.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:39.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:47.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:51.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:58.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:00.000] Order now. [01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:10.000] This is the Logos Radio Network. [01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:33.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:19:33.000 --> 01:19:38.000] This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig, and we are talking with Larry in Arizona. [01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:41.000] All right, Larry, now you said you got a civil lawsuit. [01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:50.000] They've filed it against three of you, and you filed an answer to the lawsuit, but the other parties didn't. [01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:56.000] So my first question is, is in the lawsuit against you, how did they list their claims? [01:19:56.000 --> 01:20:06.000] Did they list them against you collectively with each claim, or did they list them against each individual for each claim? [01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:09.000] I think it's against each individual. [01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:13.000] Okay, then the other two probably have lost as far as that goes. [01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:18.000] You may be the only one to walk away unscathed. [01:20:18.000 --> 01:20:30.000] Because what's going to happen now is if the court isn't going to accept your answer as an answer for all parties, then the others have defaulted. [01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:32.000] Okay, now the others have an attorney. [01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:35.000] I wouldn't think the attorney would let them. [01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:42.000] Don't be surprised what an attorney would let do happen to somebody if they don't think they're making enough money out of the deal. [01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:49.000] There could be a hundred reasons why the attorney thought he had something better to do. [01:20:49.000 --> 01:21:02.000] Okay, and then next week I have a disclosure statement due, and I presume I should just go ahead and do my disclosure statement, correct? [01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:04.000] Yeah. [01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:11.000] Now, the other thing is what I would do is I would – you have the contact information of the other parties? [01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:13.000] Their attorney, yes. [01:21:13.000 --> 01:21:16.000] You have their attorney but not them personally? [01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:17.000] Yes. [01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:19.000] Okay. [01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:27.000] What I would do is I would contact their attorney directly, and I would do it in writing, certified mail, [01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:38.000] and ask that attorney why it is that they have failed to file a response in answer to that suit. [01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:45.000] Because what's going to happen is you're going to wind up helping yourself as well as the others potentially with this. [01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:51.000] If it turns out this attorney is ignoring their suit even though they paid him to do the job, [01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:55.000] they're going to get to sue him for malpractice when this is over. [01:21:55.000 --> 01:22:05.000] The documentation you have sent to him could be supplied to them to use against that attorney. [01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:11.000] And as far as I'm concerned, I'd do it just to watch the sport that would follow. [01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:13.000] Okay. [01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:28.000] Because anything that puts an attorney in hot water that isn't a cannibal with a big pot – and I'd go for that too obviously – but suits me just fine. [01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:29.000] Okay. [01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:39.000] But write to him, ask him why he failed to send in a proper response to that, and save whatever answer you get, if any, [01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:51.000] and keep a good record of every communication you keep with that attorney and every failure to respond that you encounter with him. [01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:55.000] Keep a good running record of that. [01:22:55.000 --> 01:23:05.000] Because let's say, for instance, that his inaction also impacts you to the point where you lose just like they did because of what they didn't do. [01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:11.000] Guess who else gets to sue their attorney for malpractice? [01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:17.000] Oh, okay. [01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:25.000] Okay. Well, I'll get started on this in the morning, and I'll see where it goes. If I have any more problems, I'll give you a call next week. [01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:27.000] All right. Well, good luck. [01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:29.000] Okay. Thank you, Eddie. I appreciate it. [01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:37.000] Yes, sir. All right. Now we're going to go to Charles in Washington. Charles, what can we do for you? [01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:49.000] Yeah. How are you doing? I have this tutorial coming up that I talked with you about in the past. When I go to court, do I invoke the same words like we do when we're going for traffic tickets? [01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:54.000] You know, like we actually, you told Judge you're making a special appearance. And... [01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:00.000] Is this for some case against you? [01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:06.000] Yeah. They told me in front of my car some time back. I talked to you about that. [01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:13.000] Okay. Right. I got that. But is this an impound hearing or is this a judicial hearing for some charge? [01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:15.000] No, this is an impound hearing. [01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:26.000] Okay. That's something completely different. Okay. That's all administrative. That's got nothing to do with civil or criminal as far as a suit or anything like that. [01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:33.000] This is an administrative hearing. What you've got to demonstrate there is that there was no lawful authority to take the car. [01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:42.000] Now, there's lots of case law, if you can find it, that says very clearly that the police cannot arbitrarily seize property without a warrant. [01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:54.000] If they took your car without any necessary purpose to take it, such as seizing it for evidence to be used in a case of criminal activity, then the seizure was retaliatory. [01:24:54.000 --> 01:25:02.000] They have no authority to take your car just because they want to. [01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:03.000] Okay. [01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:11.000] Remember, state law, regardless of what state you're in, says very specifically when the police may order a car towed. [01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:20.000] And it always comes down to one of two or three things. It is a public safety hazard if left where it is. [01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:35.000] Okay. Such as parked in the middle of a car lane, too close to the shoulder of the road or, you know, whatever. That is being seized as evidence. [01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:37.000] Okay. [01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:38.000] Right. [01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:46.000] And it can vary depending upon what the third one is. But for the most part, those are the two primary ones they're going to have. [01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:59.000] Okay. But they would have to show that the car was involved in some sort of criminal activity and that it was being taken as evidence of that activity before they'd be authorized to take it. [01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:05.000] Or it has to have been a public safety hazard. [01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:12.000] The third one being that it's on private property and the property owner has requested it for removal. [01:26:12.000 --> 01:26:22.000] Yeah, gotcha. And I'm going to do that one. Okay. So in the beginning, what I need to incite that, because since you've explained it to me, what do I make that statement, do I make again? [01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:31.000] You need to go in there armed with what authority the police officers have to tow the car and show that that authority did not exist. [01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:35.000] It was not seized for Purpose A, Purpose B, Purpose C. [01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:43.000] I'm with you now. I got it. Okay. How do we have to expect to make it because I have a short memory problem so that I clearly get it in the second time. [01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:48.000] All right. That's what I need to find out. So I appreciate it again and report it back to me. [01:26:48.000 --> 01:26:50.000] All right. [01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:52.000] Thanks for calling in, man. [01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:58.000] All right. Now we're going to go to Oliver in Tennessee, or at least I hope it's Oliver in Tennessee. Oliver? [01:26:58.000 --> 01:26:59.000] How you doing? [01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:01.000] All right. How are you? [01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:03.000] Good, good. [01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:07.000] I had another issue that I was looking at. I went to court the other day. [01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:12.000] And you know how they give you, I don't go in that fight with them, but you know how they give you a sentence. [01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:24.000] And they found me indigent, but he turned around and charged me $200 or $400 for the two cases that I have as far as fees for attorney. [01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:27.000] And I went and checked into the TCA code. [01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:31.000] Wait a minute. What do you mean fees for attorneys? [01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:39.000] Are these civil suits or are these criminal cases? [01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:42.000] No, it's criminal traffic. [01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:48.000] Okay. So what are they charging you attorney's fees for? [01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:54.000] That's what I'm trying to explain to you. I knew it was wrong, but I didn't say anything. [01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:02.000] I figured that I would just let him do what he's going to do, then go find the evidence and then file or do whatever you would. [01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:06.000] I'm not going to pay him any ways, but I want to make sure that if I have a way to file. [01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:16.000] But I found some information which says that in the TCA code it says that the state is responsible. [01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:23.000] They set up a system for them to pay the indigent's fees to the attorneys that represent. [01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:26.000] Do you have an attorney for a defense attorney? [01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:31.000] He supplied one to me. He appointed one to me. [01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:37.000] Right. That's supposed to be at no cost to you. Why are they charging you attorney's fees? [01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:48.000] I know. I understand that concept. And I'm trying to tell you, I actually found the actual literature in the TCA, in the state statute. [01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:54.000] Right. Where the state has to pay that attorney. That we knew. That's the whole purpose of a public defender. [01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:57.000] They're paid from the public account. [01:28:57.000 --> 01:29:03.000] But what I'm trying to get at is where is this judge getting the idea that he can assess attorney's fees? [01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:06.000] That's the part I'm not getting. [01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:18.000] Well, I understand the crooked. But what I'm trying to get you to understand is this. Since the judge assessed fees that are not authorized by law. [01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:26.000] Okay. And he knows it. That judge needs to have a judicial conduct complaint filed against him. [01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:44.000] That judge, somebody needs to petition the financial records of that court through public information request and find out whether or not this judge has been illegally assessing attorney's fees against plaintiffs and stealing that money for himself or that court. [01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:47.000] They're all doing it. All the judges are over here. [01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:53.000] Okay. Well, now you need to file charges against them if you've got the code that says they can't. [01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:56.000] Hang on, Oliver. We'll pick this up on the other side, okay? [01:29:56.000 --> 01:30:03.000] All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. We'll be right back. [01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:08.000] Next time you're deep cleaning the house, be sure to dust off those old knickknacks stored in the attic. [01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:15.000] One family in England did just that and walked off with a small fortune. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you more in just a moment. [01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:21.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:34.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:41.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:52.000] While cleaning the attic, relatives of a deceased Londoner spotted a pretty piece of porcelain that brought back childhood memories. [01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:57.000] It once held flowers in their suburban home. They lovingly dusted off and had it appraised. [01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:10.000] To their surprise, the 16-inch pale blue and yellow vase painted with leaping goldfish once graced the private collection of the emperor of the Qianlong dynasty, who ruled China from 1736 to 1796. [01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:14.000] It fetched a record $83 million at auction. [01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:18.000] There's no point dying to know if you or a loved one has a treasure stashed in storage. [01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:24.000] Check the nooks and crannies of attics, closets, and basements. You too might discover a rare find. [01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:43.000] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000] Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:50.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:55.000] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:58.000] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:06.000] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:11.000] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it. [01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:15.000] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:21.000] That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:27.000] And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. [01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:32.000] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:39.000] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:46.000] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:51.000] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.000] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:04.000] May not actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:04.000 --> 01:33:08.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network. [01:33:08.000 --> 01:33:29.000] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:31.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:36.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Oliver in Tennessee. [01:33:36.000 --> 01:33:41.000] Oliver, if you've got actual evidence that all these courts are charging for this. [01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:50.000] Yeah, every time, because I practice your method as far as driving without blackness, religiously. [01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:52.000] So I'm always up in court defending myself. [01:33:52.000 --> 01:34:00.000] And as I'm watching the proceedings, they're charging them left and right. [01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:06.000] I remember also in the circuit court also that they charge you for a public defendant downstairs, [01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:14.000] then you bond it up to the circuit court, then they charge you for a public defendant upstairs. [01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:16.000] But the law says the state has to pay for it. [01:34:16.000 --> 01:34:21.000] But does it say anywhere the state can bill the defense if they lose? [01:34:21.000 --> 01:34:22.000] Nope, nope. [01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:24.000] It says no, nothing of that nature. [01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:32.000] It says that the state, they have a system actually set up for them to report, [01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:39.000] for the public defendants to report what they had to do for the client, [01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:43.000] and they get reimbursed through that system that's written out and everything. [01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:45.000] They have steps forward and everything. [01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:53.000] Okay, then you need to be filing judicial conduct complaints and a potential lawsuit against these judges [01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:58.000] because the thing is is when they do something that is not authorized by law [01:34:58.000 --> 01:35:01.000] and is in fact under these conditions prohibited by law [01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:07.000] because there is a specific system they're required to follow, they don't have immunity for that. [01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:10.000] But here's the big thing though. [01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:17.000] They had a big thing here in our county where they were suspending people's licenses for court fees [01:35:17.000 --> 01:35:21.000] that was overdue or not paid. [01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:23.000] And I'm thinking about it. [01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:24.000] I'm like court fees. [01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:29.000] Most of these court fees are coming from attorney fees where people had to get in. [01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:32.000] So I'm trying to think. [01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:36.000] I'm thinking that maybe these two things may be tied. [01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:37.000] Possibly. [01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:39.000] They may be splitting fees with the attorneys. [01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:41.000] But then again, if the attorney is getting paid by the state, [01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:45.000] the court could be comping the entire amount they're charging. [01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:47.000] Right. [01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:49.000] So it's a scheme. [01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:50.000] Very much so. [01:35:50.000 --> 01:35:54.000] That's why I was saying you need to get your hands on the financial records [01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:57.000] for whatever agency that particular judge works for. [01:35:57.000 --> 01:36:01.000] For instance, municipal, go through the city comptroller [01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:07.000] and get public information requests in for any monies collected from these courts [01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:12.000] and how they're divided and how they're charged. [01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:17.000] Comp-troller. Comp-troller. [01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:22.000] Yeah, the city comptroller or city financial officer, whatever the title is, [01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:29.000] they will have that monetary information relating to those courts. [01:36:29.000 --> 01:36:36.000] Okay. [01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:39.000] Yeah, find out what is being charged to the defendants as, [01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:43.000] what they're exactly calling these fees they're collecting, [01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:48.000] and then where those fees go through the system. [01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:49.000] Charges. [01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:50.000] Okay. [01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:52.000] And these are for all municipal judges. [01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:55.000] Municipal, you said they did it in circuit court too. [01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:57.000] So what level court is that? [01:36:57.000 --> 01:36:58.000] Is that a county court? [01:36:58.000 --> 01:36:59.000] Is that a district court? [01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:00.000] What is it? [01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:01.000] County. County. [01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:07.000] But the one I'm in now that I know that they just charged me with $200 charges [01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:12.000] is the general session court. [01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:14.000] Okay, which is a what? [01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:15.000] Municipal. [01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:16.000] Okay. [01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:17.000] All right. [01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:20.000] Yeah, you want one for the municipal and you want one for the county, [01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:25.000] so go to the county clerk's office or to the county comptroller [01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:32.000] because they'll have their own comptroller and request the exact same thing from them. [01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:35.000] County clerk or county comptroller. [01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:42.000] Yeah, everybody as far as record keepers probably works for the county clerk, [01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:47.000] including the comptroller, but I can't say that for sure. [01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:48.000] Okay. [01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:51.000] Okay, so I go there and then I file an information. [01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:52.000] You don't need to go there. [01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:57.000] You just need to file a public information request asking for all records, [01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:01.000] identifying these fines and fees collected by these courts [01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:06.000] and name out the types of courts and showing where that money comes in, [01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:10.000] what it's called, and where it's paid out to. [01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:14.000] Where does it go once it's collected? [01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:15.000] Okay. [01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:17.000] How long does it take for this? [01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:22.000] They've got, in most states, they've got 10 days to respond to the request. [01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:25.000] You'll have to look and – I'm sorry, go ahead. [01:38:25.000 --> 01:38:28.000] The radio shows to be put on the – [01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:31.000] It all depends on what Deborah's got on her plate when it starts. [01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:37.000] She said that she's trying to give this show a priority on getting up and online, [01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:42.000] but I don't know when she's got stuff that delays her for a day or two. [01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:45.000] Normally she tries to have them up within 24 to 48 hours, [01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:49.000] but things don't always work out where she can get that done. [01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:51.000] That's just cool because I need to do a little bit of homework, too. [01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:52.000] Okay. [01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:54.000] Now, how about all the other cases that I got? [01:38:54.000 --> 01:38:56.000] You know, I usually take me about – [01:38:56.000 --> 01:39:00.000] There you've got very specific records you can ask for. [01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:01.000] Yes. [01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:04.000] They got dismissed, and I got court charges. [01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:05.000] Yes. [01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:07.000] If they got dismissed, they can't charge you anything. [01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:09.000] That's the whole point. [01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:10.000] Okay. [01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:17.000] Do I use the same technique that I'm learning from you now and apply that? [01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:24.000] Yes, except this time you know exactly what case to ask for information about. [01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:31.000] See, the first one that we're talking about here is just a blanket request for cases from such-and-such court. [01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:37.000] Please give me a breakdown of the individual fees collected by these courts that you're responsible for. [01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:42.000] And then give me a breakdown of where those fees go once you've got them. [01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:43.000] All right. [01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:47.000] That's a general request for all of the records relating to those fees. [01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:52.000] But in your case, now be sure and ask for a specific timeframe, too. [01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:57.000] Don't make it endless or you'll never get your request fulfilled. [01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:03.000] So in your other cases, though, where you've already been to court and you know exactly what the case number is, [01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:06.000] you can identify the case specifically and say, [01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:15.000] I want to know everything about these fees collected from this court under this case. [01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:16.000] Okay. [01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:24.000] And then I use the concept that I'm about to go figure out now with that. [01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:25.000] Yes. [01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:30.000] Just look up whatever your state has for open records request or public information request. [01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:31.000] Okay. [01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:32.000] So what is the judicial conduct? [01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:34.000] Is that a? [01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:37.000] Judicial conduct is a complaint against the judge. [01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:40.000] But what you're going to do is you're going to get these reports first. [01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:46.000] These reports are your evidence of wrongdoing if you can show that they violate that state law you found. [01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:53.000] And you can especially do it if you can show that they're illegally taking money and using it for unlawful purposes, [01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:59.000] which would be any purpose at all if they're not authorized by law to collect those fees. [01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:00.000] So. [01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:03.000] They're double-dipping is what it comes down to. [01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:04.000] So can I? [01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:07.000] So that's why they don't want nobody to bring recordings in the state. [01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:08.000] Bingo. [01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:12.000] So if I bring a report in the court and get them. [01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:13.000] That's not going to be enough. [01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:15.000] You need a paper trail. [01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:19.000] These reports and records you're asking for is going to be that paper trail. [01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:20.000] Gotcha. [01:41:20.000 --> 01:41:21.000] Wow. [01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:23.000] They double-dipping. [01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:25.000] And they're not going to stop. [01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:27.000] Exactly. [01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:28.000] All right. [01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:29.000] Thank you, Eddie. [01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:33.000] I'm going to put this together and see what I can do with it. [01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:35.000] Oh, I found a code. [01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:43.000] It's in the Civil, it's a remedy code, one of those civil procedure codes, [01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:56.000] but it states that foreign code and foreign code in law is not supposed to be held against the natural person. [01:41:56.000 --> 01:41:58.000] Ah, well, send me that statute. [01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:01.000] I would love to look up the details of that. [01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:02.000] Okay. [01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:03.000] All right. [01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:05.000] Yours is at Eddie. [01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:09.000] Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com, and that's E-D-D-I-E. [01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:11.000] E-D-D-I-E. [01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:15.000] I'm going to send you the whole, okay, I'm going to send you the whole E-D-D-I-E. [01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:18.000] Yeah, at ruleoflawradio.com. [01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:20.000] And you can send me a link to it if it's on a website. [01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:23.000] Just send me the link to where it is. [01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:29.000] Or if you've got the whole thing and could just give me a site to look it up in once I get it, that'll be fine too. [01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:30.000] All right. [01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:31.000] All right. [01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:32.000] I'm going to send it to you. [01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:33.000] All right. [01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:34.000] All right. [01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:35.000] Thanks, man. [01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:36.000] All right. [01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:41.000] I had another caller on the board, but they dropped off, which is too bad because I've got an entire – oh, there we go. [01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:42.000] He's back again. [01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:45.000] I've got another segment to go here, but I've only got a minute left in this one. [01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:46.000] All right. [01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:47.000] Adam, I see you on the board. [01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:53.000] I'm going to go ahead and get you started here, and then we're going to take a break here in about a half a minute. [01:42:53.000 --> 01:42:55.000] Adam, go ahead. [01:42:55.000 --> 01:42:56.000] Hey, Eddie. [01:42:56.000 --> 01:42:57.000] How are you doing? [01:42:57.000 --> 01:42:58.000] I'm doing all right. [01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:06.000] Well, hey, man, let me just start talking at you, I guess, and feel free to interject with me whenever you want. [01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:14.000] I got a ticket for possession of drug paraphernalia, which is 48 – 41.125 of the Texas – [01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:18.000] What specific type of paraphernalia? [01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:20.000] Glass marijuana pipe. [01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:21.000] Okay. [01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:23.000] With residue or without? [01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:24.000] With. [01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:25.000] Okay. [01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:28.000] Discovered where? [01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:30.000] Under my truck. [01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:32.000] Under your truck? [01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:33.000] Yes. [01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:37.000] As in tucked under your truck, or as in on the ground under your truck? [01:43:37.000 --> 01:43:39.000] On the ground under the truck. [01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:40.000] All right. [01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:45.000] Well, hang on just a second, and we'll start coping with the rest of this when we get back after this break, all right? [01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:46.000] All right, folks. [01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:48.000] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:50.000] We've got one more segment here. [01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:55.000] If you want to call in and see if we can get to you, 512-646-1984. [01:43:55.000 --> 01:43:56.000] Y'all hang in there. [01:43:56.000 --> 01:44:21.000] We'll be right back. [01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:29.000] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:34.000] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:44:34.000 --> 01:44:38.000] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:44:38.000 --> 01:44:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:44:41.000 --> 01:44:49.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [01:44:49.000 --> 01:45:00.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:03.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:15.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:14.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:14.000 --> 01:46:26.000] If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one? If you could not wage any battles alone, would your purpose test be done? [01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:49.000] What's the sentiment of a soldier, a warrior of love, scuffling the keys to peace? All they're taking is a misunderstanding, and somebody calls the police. [01:46:49.000 --> 01:47:02.000] Why do the spots fly? Why do the spots fly? [01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:07.000] The preacher is an addiction, the hard works can leave you cold as nails. [01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:19.000] Impossibility, choice, tranquility, heavy loads of tape and unscathed. The time is come all in with the conflict, you find out after a while. [01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:32.000] All right, folks. We are back, and we are talking with Adam in Texas. All right, Adam, let's go ahead. We have a drug paraphernalia, i.e. marijuana pipe, on the ground under your truck. [01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:41.000] Is this – where is the truck when this occurred? Hello, Adam? [01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:44.000] He just dropped off and called back again. He's at the bottom of the list. [01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:52.000] Oh, okay. Never mind. There we go. All right, Adam, I'm sorry. I had you on the wrong one here. [01:47:52.000 --> 01:47:57.000] That's all right. I thought it – I didn't know whose fault it was. You were talking. Go ahead. [01:47:57.000 --> 01:48:02.000] Yeah, I was asking where was the truck when this occurred? [01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:04.000] Parked on the side of a county road. [01:48:04.000 --> 01:48:07.000] So you were being pulled over? [01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:09.000] No, I was already stopped. [01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:13.000] You were already stopped and someone drove up to you? [01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:14.000] Yes, sir, got behind me. [01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:25.000] Okay. And what was the basis of his coming up to you just because you were parked on the county road? [01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:31.000] Well, I reckoned – they never said, actually. I said it was probably because my bus had a tail light, [01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:34.000] and then they just went from there and started marking orders. [01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:40.000] But let's get real far ahead here, Eddie, because I already admitted to the pipe, even though that probably was stupid and everything. [01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:44.000] But I do have a class D fine-only misdemeanor on my hands now. [01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:45.000] Okay. [01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:51.000] I'm very excited about going to the justice of the peace, so I wanted to just tell you what my plan was, and then if – [01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:52.000] Okay. [01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:55.000] Just correct me as I go. Is that all right? [01:48:55.000 --> 01:48:57.000] All right. Go ahead. [01:48:57.000 --> 01:49:01.000] Okay. The first thing I'm going to do is I'm going to write to Secretary of State, [01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:07.000] and I'm going to ask for some copies of the files of the judge and the county prosecutor who will possibly trust me. [01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:13.000] I want a copy of their act of oath of office, their anti-bribery statement, and their bond. [01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:18.000] Also, I believe the DPS officer is also an officer of the state, [01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:22.000] so he should have an anti-bribery statement and an act of oath of office on a copy of that. [01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:26.000] And even if I don't even have to use this stuff, that's my first move. [01:49:26.000 --> 01:49:34.000] Second move, I go in, I ask him, is this an administrative hearing or a judicial hearing? [01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:38.000] If he says anything other than judicial, I'm going to object, [01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:46.000] and I'm going to demand a constitutional – a constitutional judicial proceeding. [01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:53.000] What do you mean a constitutional judicial proceeding? Explain that to me. [01:49:53.000 --> 01:50:01.000] The judicial – I have inalienable rights, and one of those is not to be held in an administrative court. [01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:09.000] A full constitutional judicial proceeding would mean that that judge sitting on that bench [01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:16.000] needs to have every accoutrement of the Texas Criminal Code procedure and the penal code, [01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:20.000] including an act of oath of office and a bribery statement, bond, [01:50:20.000 --> 01:50:24.000] and we're going to do it the way it was meant to be done. [01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:28.000] We're not going to do an administrative hearing. [01:50:28.000 --> 01:50:31.000] Okay. [01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:36.000] And then once we figure that we're in a judicial proceeding, [01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:42.000] I'm also going to ask him for a copy of his bribery statement, et cetera. [01:50:42.000 --> 01:50:46.000] If you can't produce it, I'll already know if he has it or not, [01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:49.000] because I already went to the Secretary of State beforehand. [01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:54.000] Can you show me what law requires him to produce such a thing on demand? [01:50:54.000 --> 01:50:56.000] No, I can't. [01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:00.000] Right. You can't. Know why? [01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:01.000] No. [01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:05.000] Because there's no law that requires him to do so. [01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:06.000] Okay. [01:51:06.000 --> 01:51:09.000] The fact that they're required to have one on, wait a minute, [01:51:09.000 --> 01:51:17.000] the fact that they're required to have one on file before they assume the duties of their office [01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:22.000] does not equivocate to produce upon demand. [01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:23.000] Okay, I understand. [01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:28.000] So you got your answer from the Secretary of State about whether or not they have one filed [01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:31.000] if they're a state official. [01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:35.000] Now, if this is a Class C misdemeanor, you're going before a JP or a municipal judge, [01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:42.000] neither of which is a state official, at least not in relation to what their authority is. [01:51:42.000 --> 01:51:44.000] One is municipal. [01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:45.000] Wait a minute. [01:51:45.000 --> 01:51:49.000] One is municipal and one is county, not state. [01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:52.000] Both are political subdivisions, okay? [01:51:52.000 --> 01:51:53.000] Okay. [01:51:53.000 --> 01:51:58.000] Which means you're asking the wrong person when you go to the Secretary of State. [01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:03.000] Only the district courts and the supreme courts and the appellate courts [01:52:03.000 --> 01:52:07.000] will have their oath of office on file with the Secretary of State. [01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:09.000] Okay, good information. [01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:14.000] The county courts at law will have theirs on file with the district clerk. [01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:20.000] The justice of the peace will have his on file with the county clerk. [01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:25.000] The municipal judge will have his on file with the city secretary. [01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:28.000] Okay. [01:52:28.000 --> 01:52:32.000] So the only place to find his is at the county, county clerk. [01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:35.000] If it's a JP, yes. [01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:36.000] Okay. [01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:37.000] All right. [01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:39.000] But does he still have to have it? [01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:40.000] Absolutely. [01:52:40.000 --> 01:52:42.000] A JP is an elected officer. [01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:43.000] Okay. [01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:44.000] That's what I read. [01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:45.000] Yeah, okay. [01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:46.000] You almost threw me off. [01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:47.000] Okay. [01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:48.000] Well, I cleared that up. [01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:52.000] So then the next thing I would do is I'm going to walk in there and I'm going to challenge [01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:55.000] his jurisdiction. [01:52:55.000 --> 01:52:59.000] And I don't know how he's going to respond to that or react. [01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:01.000] But that's what I'm going to do. [01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:03.000] And I'm just going to take it from there, man. [01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:07.000] And I want to fight as hard as I can over this. [01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:13.000] You know, I know that I'm entitled to a jury of 12 of my peers. [01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:19.000] You know, I know that I have the right to all these rules of evidence apply to all the [01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:25.000] courts, the best rules of evidence will apply. [01:53:25.000 --> 01:53:28.000] And I've got rights and I'm pretty aware of them. [01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:30.000] So I'm going to go exercise. [01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:34.000] And I just want to call you and talk to you a little bit. [01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:35.000] All right, man. [01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:37.000] Anything else? [01:53:37.000 --> 01:53:43.000] Is there anything else I should watch out for? [01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:47.000] Their left hook? [01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:52.000] No, just I have a feeling that even though you are correct in what they're required to [01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:57.000] have, as much as you need to preserve it for the record, this needs to be done in writing [01:53:57.000 --> 01:54:00.000] when you're challenging what they don't have. [01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:07.000] Don't go into a court of no record and just say stuff because there's no record of what you said. [01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:12.000] If you want to challenge his jurisdiction because of the lack of an oath or a bond, [01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:15.000] then you need to do that in writing so there's a record of it. [01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:18.000] Well, everything should be in writing, certified, returned. [01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:21.000] Absolutely everything. [01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:22.000] Yeah, I got that. [01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:23.000] Yeah, okay. [01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:27.000] Well, let's talk about a little bit more about jurisdiction. [01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:31.000] What are the three main reasons why he doesn't have jurisdiction over me? [01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:35.000] Well, that would depend on what it is you're being charged with. [01:54:35.000 --> 01:54:40.000] Well, it's a crime to be fined only under the Texas Health and Safety Code, [01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:42.000] which I don't think that applies to me. [01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:50.000] Well, what does the Texas Health and Safety Code say in relation to the charge? [01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:55.000] And what specific code are they charging you under? [01:54:55.000 --> 01:54:57.000] The Texas Health and Safety Code. [01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:00.000] No, what specific section of the code? [01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:09.000] 48.125 Texas Health and Safety Code, possession or delivery of drug paraphernalia. [01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:14.000] So mine would be 48.125A. [01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:18.000] Okay, do me a favor and send me an email with that site in it, [01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:26.000] and I will look it up and I will get back to you on what I find when I read that. [01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:31.000] And then I'll answer your questions on the jurisdictional challenges you need to be making. [01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:33.000] Because something tells me you may have looked it up, [01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:36.000] but you haven't read it and understood what it says. [01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:38.000] Something's just telling me that. [01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:42.000] I wasn't even aware of the Texas Health and Safety Code until I found it, [01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:44.000] but it's just pretty big. [01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:46.000] Oh, yeah, it covers a lot. [01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:49.000] And you're probably correcting that it doesn't apply to you, [01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:54.000] but we need to read it to see how they're trying to use it. [01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:55.000] Okay. [01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:56.000] Okay. [01:55:56.000 --> 01:55:57.000] All right. [01:55:57.000 --> 01:55:59.000] Well, I'll try to get with you, Eddie. [01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:00.000] I sure do enjoy your program. [01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:01.000] I'm a listener all the time. [01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:03.000] I've called him several times. [01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:04.000] I'll let you go for the next guy. [01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:05.000] Thank you. [01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:06.000] All right. [01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:07.000] Thanks for calling in. [01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:08.000] All right. [01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:09.000] Let's see if I can get this done. [01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:16.000] Greg in Texas, you have about two and a half minutes or let two minutes. [01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:17.000] Okay. [01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:18.000] I'll try to make it quick. [01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:22.000] So this is the last, and I have the seminar book. [01:56:22.000 --> 01:56:28.000] The question I have is I was charged with driving while license is invalid, pulled over, [01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:33.000] wasn't Mirandized or anything like that, and then I was arrested, taken to jail, [01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:38.000] and then transported to Travis County because the city didn't have, [01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:42.000] their magistrate couldn't do Class B misdemeanors. [01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:44.000] Car was impounded and everything like that. [01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:46.000] Why are they charging you with Class B? [01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:48.000] Do you have a prior conviction? [01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:49.000] Yes. [01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:53.000] Okay. [01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:57.000] So when, like I've already done my motions and all that. [01:56:57.000 --> 01:57:04.000] My question is whenever the case gets dismissed or the charges get dropped, [01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:07.000] what repercussions do I have to, [01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:11.000] do I have anything so I can regain the money I had to pay for bonding out [01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:14.000] and for towing the, getting the car out of the impact? [01:57:14.000 --> 01:57:17.000] Not unless you sue somebody. [01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:18.000] I'm sorry? [01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:20.000] Not unless you sue somebody. [01:57:20.000 --> 01:57:21.000] And when? [01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:24.000] So I would have to sue the police officer, right? [01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:29.000] Well, without knowing any of the specific details of who you could sue for what, [01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:33.000] I don't know how to answer that, but that would be a start. [01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:36.000] Okay. [01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:39.000] Because he transported me, I asked him, I said, [01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:43.000] because I had another case that was pending for driving while license invalid [01:57:43.000 --> 01:57:49.000] that I've got, particularly in Austin, and the cops just wrote me a summon, [01:57:49.000 --> 01:57:55.000] and then in Flickerville he told me to, that it was policy, [01:57:55.000 --> 01:58:01.000] that different departments or different, I guess, jurisdictions have different policies on it. [01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:04.000] So that's why he towed and impounded my car and took me to jail, even though the... [01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:09.000] The jurisdiction can't set any policy that violates your rights or state law. [01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:10.000] It's that simple. [01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:14.000] So if they have a policy that authorizes them to do that, [01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:18.000] that's something you could sue the entire department over. [01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:19.000] Okay. [01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:20.000] All right. [01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:21.000] But any... [01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:22.000] Okay, Greg, I'm sorry. [01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:23.000] I am out of time. [01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:25.000] So if you've got any more about this, send it to me in an email, [01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:30.000] Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com, and I'll get back to you as quick as I can, okay? [01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:31.000] All right, thanks. [01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:32.000] All right. [01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:33.000] All right, folks. [01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:35.000] This has been another Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig. [01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:37.000] I want to thank you all for calling in. [01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:41.000] I'm sorry for the amount of time we got here, but we do have a limited set of it. [01:58:41.000 --> 01:58:44.000] But I want to thank you all for listening and for calling in. [01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:50.000] Have a great week, good night, and God bless. [01:59:14.000 --> 01:59:41.000] We'll see you next time. [01:59:44.000 --> 01:59:57.000] Thank you.