[00:00.000 --> 00:07.760]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown. Providing the jelly
[00:07.760 --> 00:15.440]  bulletins for the commodities market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop
[00:15.440 --> 00:25.760]  into the tides of the alternative. Markets for Wednesday, July 20th, 2016 are currently
[00:25.760 --> 00:34.040]  treading with gold at $1,318.42 an ounce, silver $19.53 an ounce, Texas crude $44.65
[00:34.040 --> 00:45.640]  a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $667 U.S. currency. Today in history,
[00:45.640 --> 00:51.520]  the year 1977, the Central Intelligence Agency releases 20,000 documents relating to Project
[00:51.520 --> 00:56.000]  MKUltra under the Freedom of Information Act, revealing that it engaged in mind control
[00:56.000 --> 01:05.400]  experiments. Today in history. In recent news, Reuters and several human rights organizations
[01:05.400 --> 01:10.320]  including the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, SOHR, and Amnesty International have
[01:10.320 --> 01:15.840]  reported that anywhere between 56 and 160 civilians, including at least 11 children,
[01:15.840 --> 01:20.000]  were killed in a U.S.-led airstrike in Syria yesterday. It appears the strike had apparently
[01:20.000 --> 01:24.880]  hit a school that was sheltering displaced people from Syria. SOHR is reporting that
[01:24.880 --> 01:30.200]  at least 167 civilians have been killed so far in the city of Manbij since May, when
[01:30.200 --> 01:39.120]  the U.S.-led coalition started their campaign in the area.
[01:39.120 --> 01:42.760]  Researchers have published a new map of the brain detailing nearly 100 previously unknown
[01:42.760 --> 01:48.120]  regions today. Matthew F. Glasser, a neuroscientist at Washington University School of Medicine
[01:48.120 --> 01:52.960]  and lead author of the new research said that, quote, this map you should think of as a version
[01:52.960 --> 01:58.680]  1.0. There may be a version 2.0 as the data gets better and more eyes look at the data.
[01:58.680 --> 02:03.240]  We hope the map can evolve as the science progresses. Three years ago, Dr. Glasser and
[02:03.240 --> 02:07.960]  his colleagues set out to create a new, much more detailed and precise map of the human
[02:07.960 --> 02:13.440]  brain using data collected by the Human Connectum Project, where 1,200 volunteers were studied
[02:13.440 --> 02:18.000]  with powerful new brain scanners. The project team recorded high-resolution images of each
[02:18.000 --> 02:22.560]  participant's brain and then recorded its activity during hours of tests on memory,
[02:22.560 --> 02:26.960]  language, and other kinds of thought. Scientists plan on using this new map to track the development
[02:26.960 --> 02:32.240]  of young brains and to look for changes caused by disorders like Alzheimer's and other neurological
[02:32.240 --> 02:33.240]  disorders.
[02:33.240 --> 02:52.240]  The Old Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. If you have a product or a service
[02:52.240 --> 03:17.000]  that matches that goal, don't hesitate to do so using 1.0.
[03:17.000 --> 03:23.000]  Tell me what you're gonna do, what you're gonna do
[03:24.000 --> 03:25.000]  Yeah
[03:26.000 --> 03:31.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you're gonna do, what you're gonna do when they come for you
[03:31.000 --> 03:37.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you're gonna do, what you're gonna do when they come for you
[03:37.000 --> 03:42.000]  When you were eight and you had bad treats You'd go to school and learn the golden rule
[03:42.000 --> 03:47.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool If you get hot then you must get cool
[03:47.000 --> 03:53.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you're gonna do, what you're gonna do when they come for you
[03:53.000 --> 03:58.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you're gonna do, what you're gonna do when they come for you
[03:58.000 --> 04:04.000]  You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father
[04:04.000 --> 04:05.000]  Okay.
[04:05.000 --> 04:06.000]  Howdy, howdy.
[04:06.000 --> 04:14.920]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio on this Thursday, the 21st day
[04:14.920 --> 04:20.360]  of July, 2016.
[04:20.360 --> 04:22.400]  The phone lines are open.
[04:22.400 --> 04:24.880]  We'll have them open all night.
[04:24.880 --> 04:32.080]  I'm going to start out talking about something interesting that I discovered in the federal
[04:32.080 --> 04:35.720]  code.
[04:35.720 --> 04:44.040]  I had filed some declaratory judgment cases in the state court, and every time I file
[04:44.040 --> 04:49.480]  a declaratory judgment, like a quiet title or something in the state, they'll immediately
[04:49.480 --> 04:54.480]  move it to the feds, and these corrupt federal judges here in Fort Worth will dismiss it
[04:54.480 --> 05:01.080]  with prejudice immediately, and no matter what it says, make no difference.
[05:01.080 --> 05:03.120]  They dismiss with prejudice immediately.
[05:03.120 --> 05:09.920]  I've got O'Connor, and I've got McBride both doing this, so I'm in the process of filing
[05:09.920 --> 05:17.120]  criminal charges against both of them, but in the meantime, I came across a 28 U.S. Code
[05:17.120 --> 05:29.920]  2201, is titled, Creation of Remedy, in a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction,
[05:29.920 --> 05:36.520]  except with respect to federal taxes, other than actions brought under Section 7428 of
[05:36.520 --> 05:46.920]  the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, a proceeding under Section 505 or 1146 of Title 11, that's
[05:46.920 --> 05:54.720]  the Bankruptcy Code, or in any civil action involving an anti-dumping or contravailing
[05:54.720 --> 06:03.920]  duty proceeding regarding a class or kind of merchandise of a free trade area country,
[06:03.920 --> 06:12.120]  as you find in Section 516A, F10 of the Tariff Act of 1930, that's giving me a headache.
[06:12.120 --> 06:15.040]  I'm going to jump over on that.
[06:15.040 --> 06:22.280]  Any court of the United States, upon the filing of an appropriate reading, please, oops, let
[06:22.280 --> 06:28.680]  me start all over, any court of the United States, upon the filing of an appropriate
[06:28.680 --> 06:36.480]  pleading, may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking
[06:36.480 --> 06:37.480]  such declaration.
[06:37.480 --> 06:44.360]  Whether or not further relief is or could be sought, any such declaration shall have
[06:44.360 --> 06:51.280]  the force and effect of a final judgment or decree, and shall be reviewable as such.
[06:51.280 --> 07:00.240]  Okay, doesn't sound like a whole lot on its face, however, we have been having a lot of
[07:00.240 --> 07:02.480]  trouble with courts.
[07:02.480 --> 07:08.960]  Apparently, the federal courts have bought and paid for by the banks, and the federal
[07:08.960 --> 07:17.920]  court is going to look for anything it can to misrepresent your case and trash it, and
[07:17.920 --> 07:20.120]  that's what they've been doing.
[07:20.120 --> 07:24.880]  They make up stuff that's only, it's not really in the case.
[07:24.880 --> 07:35.320]  I file a quiet title action based on the fact that the suit was rescinded, and by the fact
[07:35.320 --> 07:44.600]  that I refer to rescission as having already taken place, the court, when they remove it
[07:44.600 --> 07:50.800]  to the federal courts, the court will jump right on that rescission and rule on rescission,
[07:50.800 --> 07:55.120]  but it has no authority to rule on rescission, but it's looking for anything that it can
[07:55.120 --> 07:58.400]  pretend to rule against you on.
[07:58.400 --> 08:07.600]  So I'm looking at filing a petition for declaratory judgment under this act.
[08:07.600 --> 08:15.040]  So under this act, they can't talk about damages, they can't talk about harm.
[08:15.040 --> 08:18.040]  Harm is irrelevant in this case.
[08:18.040 --> 08:26.640]  It only goes to what does the law say the positions of the parties are.
[08:26.640 --> 08:35.080]  Now I have up the, in the federal practice manual, instead of calling this creation of
[08:35.080 --> 08:40.000]  remedy, they call this Declaratory Judgment Act.
[08:40.000 --> 08:50.920]  The Declaratory Judgment Act offers a unique mechanism by which advocates may seek to remedy
[08:50.920 --> 08:55.480]  ongoing violations of statutory or constitutional provisions.
[08:55.480 --> 09:03.040]  The act may authorize broad declaratory and injunctive release without resort to a class
[09:03.040 --> 09:05.840]  action procedure.
[09:05.840 --> 09:13.960]  Distinctive features of the act allow prospective defendants to sue to establish their non-liability
[09:13.960 --> 09:20.000]  and afford a party threatened with liability an opportunity for adjudication before its
[09:20.000 --> 09:23.520]  adversary commences litigation.
[09:23.520 --> 09:38.240]  For instance, we file for declaratory ruling saying that when mortgage company X went out
[09:38.240 --> 09:50.480]  of business and failed to transfer its assets to some other party, and then years later
[09:50.480 --> 10:01.520]  mortgage electronic registration systems purports to act as a agent for this no longer existing
[10:01.520 --> 10:10.200]  mortgage company that mortgage electronic registration system lacks standing as an agent
[10:10.200 --> 10:14.760]  or nominee for the lender.
[10:14.760 --> 10:19.840]  Every time this kind of argument is brought in the court, the court will come completely
[10:19.840 --> 10:27.600]  ignore it, and there has to be something else in the case if you have this in it, so they'll
[10:27.600 --> 10:32.640]  go to something else and dismiss on something else and completely ignore this argument.
[10:32.640 --> 10:42.000]  So this gives us a way to go in and force the court up on the dime.
[10:42.000 --> 10:52.480]  A good example here is rescission, rescission is something that the bankers really, really
[10:52.480 --> 10:58.320]  hate, but their problem is they didn't buy and pay for the Supreme Court, so the Supreme
[10:58.320 --> 11:05.320]  Court ruled against them, and now they've got all the judges, anytime you mention rescission
[11:05.320 --> 11:08.200]  they go to something else and trash your case.
[11:08.200 --> 11:15.840]  I'd look for case law on rescission, I can't find but one or two cases, they're very limited.
[11:15.840 --> 11:21.000]  Courts seem to be doing everything they can to trash every rescission case that gets in
[11:21.000 --> 11:26.360]  front of them and rule against the litigant on something other than rescission, so this
[11:26.360 --> 11:31.000]  may be a way to force rescission right in front of them.
[11:31.000 --> 11:39.880]  If anybody has a foreclosure issue, before you start filing action or if you see foreclosure
[11:39.880 --> 11:49.920]  coming and you look in the public record and you find that there is no clear and uninterrupted
[11:49.920 --> 12:00.440]  chain of title, then you can go after any entity that is not domiciled in the state
[12:00.440 --> 12:03.360]  you're in, and MERS is always going to be one of those.
[12:03.360 --> 12:11.640]  If there is a national association, all the major banks are national associations, that
[12:11.640 --> 12:15.520]  will get you in the federal court, it can get you in under the Declaratory Judgment
[12:15.520 --> 12:16.520]  Act.
[12:16.520 --> 12:21.480]  It may be more effective to file under the Declaratory Judgment Act directly in the federal
[12:21.480 --> 12:27.000]  court than rather than try to petition for declaratory judgment in the state and have
[12:27.000 --> 12:30.040]  it removed to the Fed.
[12:30.040 --> 12:38.040]  Some thoughts and consideration, you might look at 28 U.S. Code 2201 and then look up
[12:38.040 --> 12:44.840]  the Federal Practice Manual for that, generally if you do a search for 28 U.S. Code 2201,
[12:44.840 --> 12:51.520]  you will get a link to Section 9.3 of the Federal Practice Manual, the Declaratory Judgment
[12:51.520 --> 12:52.520]  Act.
[12:52.520 --> 12:58.680]  Okay, last one story and I'm sticking to it, we have Mark from Wisconsin, we're going
[12:58.680 --> 13:01.720]  to go to Mark, I know he has been causing trouble.
[13:01.720 --> 13:03.360]  Hello, Mark.
[13:03.360 --> 13:10.240]  Hello, Mr. Shelton, and actually tonight's call is not about starting trouble or having
[13:10.240 --> 13:16.080]  trouble, it's about thinking about starting some different trouble, and so kind of a philosophical
[13:16.080 --> 13:18.560]  question, legal philosophical question.
[13:18.560 --> 13:26.920]  Now, I know that the courts have a long history here, at least the last four or five decades
[13:26.920 --> 13:34.680]  of totally ignoring the idea of perjury, you can't seem to get anybody nailed for the crime
[13:34.680 --> 13:41.040]  of perjury lying in court, and I was wondering, is there some case law hanging out there in
[13:41.040 --> 13:50.600]  the wings that has it where the idea of perjury is the legislature stepping into the realm
[13:50.600 --> 13:58.320]  of the judiciary, and so is there some unpublished case out there that makes that point?
[13:58.320 --> 14:06.280]  Wait a minute, I'm not sure I understand the question, the link to the legislature.
[14:06.280 --> 14:13.360]  All right, the idea is the legislature is supposed to be separate from the judiciary,
[14:13.360 --> 14:20.280]  and so when the legislature makes a law that would explicitly go towards something that
[14:20.280 --> 14:29.560]  happened in a courtroom, which is supposed to, of course, be the realm of the judiciary,
[14:29.560 --> 14:35.920]  is there a problem there, and this is why they've been not touching perjury, it sits
[14:35.920 --> 14:42.280]  on the books as one of those things that's a crime but is never enforced, because they're
[14:42.280 --> 14:51.280]  worried about some precedent or some well-argued case that is otherwise not well-known.
[14:51.280 --> 14:57.000]  I think it's just judges and lawyers.
[14:57.000 --> 15:05.960]  Judges are always lawyers before their judges, and if they're lawyers, they're liars, so
[15:05.960 --> 15:17.000]  they spit their career misconstruing the facts, it is their job to twist and construe everything
[15:17.000 --> 15:23.280]  in their client's favor, even if it's not in their client's favor, so if perjury were
[15:23.280 --> 15:34.560]  actively prosecuted, it put most existing lawyers in prison, so I can understand these
[15:34.560 --> 15:44.640]  professional liars not wanting perjury prosecuted, but then that goes back to you and me.
[15:44.640 --> 15:52.600]  We haven't done our job, you and me, you and I, we haven't done our job, we haven't pursued
[15:52.600 --> 16:00.960]  prosecution of perjury, when we give the judge notice of perjury and the judge fails to act,
[16:00.960 --> 16:08.280]  we should move against the judge for subordination of perjury, I mean that's a specific statute
[16:08.280 --> 16:20.640]  the legislature passed to support prosecution of perjury, and we're not using it, but as
[16:20.640 --> 16:25.560]  far as legislation allowing it, I can't find it anywhere.
[16:25.560 --> 16:33.360]  Well, I figured that you would have run across it more often than I have, I tried to see
[16:33.360 --> 16:38.400]  if this was a rabbit hole, and I think I heard the background music there, so we'll come
[16:38.400 --> 16:40.880]  on the other side of the rabbit hole, remember that?
[16:40.880 --> 16:46.600]  That's the rabbit in the hole playing music, okay, we'll be right back, Randy Kelton, Debra
[16:46.600 --> 16:52.960]  Stevens, rule of our radio, our call-in number, 512-646-1984, we'll have the phone lines
[16:52.960 --> 17:01.800]  open all night, so give us a call, we'll be right back.
[17:01.800 --> 17:06.200]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network?
[17:06.200 --> 17:10.600]  On top of the on-air talent, producers and other hard-working individuals working behind
[17:10.600 --> 17:14.880]  the scenes, Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners
[17:14.880 --> 17:19.400]  like you, and we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year on our annual
[17:19.400 --> 17:23.520]  fundraisers, which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[17:23.520 --> 17:28.880]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution, every $25 donation enters
[17:28.880 --> 17:33.680]  you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks, first prize being a Spiked
[17:33.680 --> 17:38.040]  Skull Lower Receiver, second prize being a Taurus Curve, 10 winners will receive gift
[17:38.040 --> 17:42.360]  cards from All About Vapor, and if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will
[17:42.360 --> 17:47.320]  also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud, donations by all major credit cards are
[17:47.320 --> 17:50.240]  accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[17:50.240 --> 17:55.160]  The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser, head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information
[17:55.160 --> 18:00.160]  and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[18:00.160 --> 18:04.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:04.880 --> 18:08.960]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:08.960 --> 18:13.240]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.240 --> 18:14.240]  can win too.
[18:14.240 --> 18:19.120]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.120 --> 18:24.560]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to
[18:24.560 --> 18:29.080]  answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports,
[18:29.080 --> 18:33.720]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.720 --> 18:38.840]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.840 --> 18:40.960]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.960 --> 18:46.480]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.480 --> 18:49.480]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.480 --> 18:58.480]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[18:58.480 --> 18:59.480]  collectors now.
[18:59.480 --> 19:07.600]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the Logos Radio Network.com.
[19:07.600 --> 19:14.600]  Look what we've got.
[19:14.600 --> 19:21.600]  We are the Christians.
[19:21.600 --> 19:26.600]  Don't know what I did.
[19:26.600 --> 19:31.600]  Don't have the answer.
[19:31.600 --> 19:36.600]  We are the Christians.
[19:36.600 --> 19:41.600]  Look what we've got.
[19:41.600 --> 19:42.840]  Okay.
[19:42.840 --> 19:43.840]  We are back.
[19:43.840 --> 19:49.480]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin.
[19:49.480 --> 19:55.480]  Mark, this goes to something that I have been kicking around and contemplating and wondering
[19:55.480 --> 19:58.720]  about for a while.
[19:58.720 --> 20:04.520]  We go into court and we expect the court to determine the facts in accordance with the
[20:04.520 --> 20:09.080]  rules of evidence that apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case, but
[20:09.080 --> 20:19.800]  we also expect the court in the process to actively enforce appropriate law, and then
[20:19.800 --> 20:22.800]  the court doesn't.
[20:22.800 --> 20:30.600]  Clearly, we know what the remedy is, but we haven't been exercising the remedy.
[20:30.600 --> 20:35.160]  It's not just that we haven't been exercising it.
[20:35.160 --> 20:44.960]  There's something about the way we tend to hold our mind when we walk into the court.
[20:44.960 --> 20:56.280]  We think of the court as being in some special position of power, influence, and discretion.
[20:56.280 --> 21:03.560]  I think we need to find a way to dispel that notion that we walk into the court and we
[21:03.560 --> 21:11.320]  have a bailiff over here and he has certain powers and duties that he has to perform.
[21:11.320 --> 21:18.320]  We have a clerk up here that has certain powers and duties, and then we have a judge up there
[21:18.320 --> 21:25.080]  that we somehow assume he can do anything he wants to.
[21:25.080 --> 21:29.960]  All we can do is be upset about it when he doesn't.
[21:29.960 --> 21:35.640]  It goes back to this notion that they are the servants and I am the master.
[21:35.640 --> 21:44.920]  In hideous time that we began to take our judges to legal tact, ask as quickly as we
[21:44.920 --> 21:51.560]  will an Arab police officer, I'm not talking about shooting at him, that's garbage, but
[21:51.560 --> 21:58.280]  we certainly should be filing criminal charges against a judge when a judge exerts or purports
[21:58.280 --> 22:06.440]  to exert an authority he doesn't have or fails to perform a duty he's required to perform.
[22:06.440 --> 22:12.760]  Enforcing of the criminal laws is one of them, and in the process denies us full and free
[22:12.760 --> 22:16.680]  access to or enjoyment of the right.
[22:16.680 --> 22:23.000]  Why haven't we been doing that?
[22:23.000 --> 22:24.360]  Looks like we lost Mark.
[22:24.360 --> 22:25.360]  Oh, okay.
[22:25.360 --> 22:28.360]  I've already talked to him.
[22:28.360 --> 22:29.360]  Anyway, okay.
[22:29.360 --> 22:30.360]  You there, Mark?
[22:30.360 --> 22:31.360]  Oh, hold on.
[22:31.360 --> 22:32.360]  I lost you.
[22:32.360 --> 22:33.360]  There you go.
[22:33.360 --> 22:34.360]  Okay.
[22:34.360 --> 22:35.360]  You there, Mark?
[22:35.360 --> 22:36.360]  Okay.
[22:36.360 --> 22:37.360]  Yeah.
[22:37.360 --> 22:38.360]  I'm still here.
[22:38.360 --> 22:39.360]  Okay.
[22:39.360 --> 22:46.560]  If I sounded like I was doing some double-speakers because my producer's in my ear and sometimes
[22:46.560 --> 22:47.560]  I get confused.
[22:47.560 --> 22:51.280]  Oh, guys, we don't multitask well.
[22:51.280 --> 22:52.720]  Okay.
[22:52.720 --> 23:01.120]  But we need to develop a way of thinking about these judges differently, and then a set of
[23:01.120 --> 23:03.640]  methods for going after them.
[23:03.640 --> 23:08.040]  At least that's my opinion.
[23:08.040 --> 23:09.040]  Okay.
[23:09.040 --> 23:18.280]  The set of methods that I went ahead and read is the Wisconsin Statute 96801, where you walk
[23:18.280 --> 23:25.360]  in with your criminal complaint and ask the judge to be the witness on your criminal complaint,
[23:25.360 --> 23:34.920]  and it's like you walk in with plutonium, they scatter, and they won't sign anything.
[23:34.920 --> 23:40.440]  You write straight up, ignore 96801.
[23:40.440 --> 23:43.640]  So, I mean, that is something.
[23:43.640 --> 23:52.120]  So, do you make up one against the magistrate for official misconduct?
[23:52.120 --> 23:57.400]  I have not yet, but that's what I'm going to do, and in fact, I previously mentioned
[23:57.400 --> 24:06.160]  that Wisconsin has a class I felony for judges, where it looks like I could go after that,
[24:06.160 --> 24:14.120]  and you had went, oh, goody for you, back when I mentioned it three, four months ago.
[24:14.120 --> 24:17.600]  So, you just have to find the right judge.
[24:17.600 --> 24:24.360]  I vaguely remember you talking about that, and it's time we started doing that, and I
[24:24.360 --> 24:28.360]  guess one of the things I need to work on is a prescription.
[24:28.360 --> 24:35.680]  This kind of goes to the Tar Baby method, where we get the judge to stick to it.
[24:35.680 --> 24:42.480]  It sounds like you have more leverage in Wisconsin than most states have, because most states
[24:42.480 --> 24:46.360]  haven't addressed the judge specifically.
[24:46.360 --> 24:47.840]  Right.
[24:47.840 --> 24:55.400]  Well, again, even if that statute is there, if no one's ever been prosecuted under it,
[24:55.400 --> 24:59.840]  it's kind of like the rules of ethics for lawyers.
[24:59.840 --> 25:04.400]  If you're busy taking trust fund money, they're all over that.
[25:04.400 --> 25:12.920]  If you are engaged in a relationship with a client, they're all over that, but things
[25:12.920 --> 25:19.440]  like you're supposed to turn in your fellow lawyers when they're engaged in misconduct,
[25:19.440 --> 25:26.760]  you can't find anything, or the lawyer outright lying, and they say, oh, no, there's no problem.
[25:26.760 --> 25:36.920]  So they need a client that will make up a criminal complaint for aggravated perjury
[25:36.920 --> 25:44.080]  against the lawyer on the other side, hand it to the judge, and when the judge refuses
[25:44.080 --> 25:49.280]  to sign it, just run the routine on the judge.
[25:49.280 --> 25:51.600]  Probably wouldn't take many of these.
[25:51.600 --> 25:58.960]  The judge doesn't want to pursue the lawyer for aggravated perjury, but then again, he
[25:58.960 --> 26:03.840]  doesn't want himself pursued for official misconduct either.
[26:03.840 --> 26:10.080]  And once we start hammering the judges, you know, the judge has got 50 lawyers a day in
[26:10.080 --> 26:12.360]  front of him.
[26:12.360 --> 26:16.920]  So where the lawyer may get one complaint, the judge could get 50.
[26:16.920 --> 26:17.920]  Yes.
[26:17.920 --> 26:26.400]  So we start hitting that judge, just going to count up on him quickly, and someone just
[26:26.400 --> 26:33.640]  sent me a link to this kid in California who actually did what I've been trying to produce
[26:33.640 --> 26:36.600]  all this time, just for traffic tickets.
[26:36.600 --> 26:41.400]  He put out a little questionnaire, and you fill out the questionnaire, and it spits you
[26:41.400 --> 26:47.760]  out a letter to send to the court.
[26:47.760 --> 26:50.400]  We need to, I need to get back to that.
[26:50.400 --> 26:54.800]  I've been wasting all my time trying to make a living.
[26:54.800 --> 27:02.680]  This nonsense of having to work is interfering with my entertainment, but we really need
[27:02.680 --> 27:11.800]  to get a questionnaire down that will lead to a set of complaints so that somebody can
[27:11.800 --> 27:15.120]  just fill out the questionnaire and just spit out the complaints is one of the things I'm
[27:15.120 --> 27:23.760]  trying to get to, but I can't seem to get programmers to understand this is relatively
[27:23.760 --> 27:32.520]  simple, but every time I try to get it programmed, I wind up with problems, and I'm frustrated.
[27:32.520 --> 27:38.160]  But this is something we could definitely do that with, and as a matter of fact, the
[27:38.160 --> 27:41.720]  kid was certainly an inspiration.
[27:41.720 --> 27:45.760]  I may try to do one for aggravated perjury.
[27:45.760 --> 27:56.280]  So, Mark, how would we put together a questionnaire for aggravated perjury, and then turn that
[27:56.280 --> 28:03.800]  into a criminal complaint against a lawyer, and then set in the steps where you take the
[28:03.800 --> 28:07.760]  complaint against the lawyer, give it to the judge, and the judge refuses it, and then
[28:07.760 --> 28:12.240]  the step where you take, where it creates one against the judge that you then file it
[28:12.240 --> 28:17.600]  with the next judge, and we start the routine on it?
[28:17.600 --> 28:23.520]  Well, the simple snarky version would be, are their lips moving?
[28:23.520 --> 28:29.160]  Yes, and then just spit out the form.
[28:29.160 --> 28:35.840]  The harder part is to find the conduct that is so over the top.
[28:35.840 --> 28:37.760]  It's real hard for them politically.
[28:37.760 --> 28:40.880]  No, wait, wait, no, no, no.
[28:40.880 --> 28:48.200]  The one thing I found in doing this, that when one of them does something that's really
[28:48.200 --> 28:55.160]  over the top, everybody bails in there to protect him, because if they wind up doing
[28:55.160 --> 29:00.560]  something really over the top, they want their buddies to protect them.
[29:00.560 --> 29:10.840]  What they're not so crazy about protecting is when you charge one with crapona, like
[29:10.840 --> 29:17.800]  that stuff with the hearing aid trick I pulled on Judge Hayes, and got him to deny me in
[29:17.800 --> 29:26.240]  accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, really, really minor, seems to be more
[29:26.240 --> 29:33.800]  effective against them than something major, because it comes right out of the clear blue
[29:33.800 --> 29:34.800]  sky.
[29:34.800 --> 29:41.320]  I did this minor little thing, and now he's landed on me like a ton of bricks.
[29:41.320 --> 29:43.720]  Make him a lot more careful.
[29:43.720 --> 29:48.160]  I was just in Hayes' court, and he could not have been more polite.
[29:48.160 --> 29:49.160]  Hang on.
[29:49.160 --> 29:53.080]  I'm going to break Randy Kelton, David Stevens, and Rue of La Radio.
[29:53.080 --> 29:57.040]  I'll call it number 512-646-1984.
[29:57.040 --> 30:03.200]  We'll be right back.
[30:03.200 --> 30:07.560]  Genetically modified plants threaten entire ecosystems, but there's one GM crop that
[30:07.560 --> 30:09.720]  could threaten the future of the human race.
[30:09.720 --> 30:14.480]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll have the scary details on a crop that can make
[30:14.480 --> 30:16.880]  you sterile next.
[30:16.880 --> 30:18.620]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.620 --> 30:23.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[30:23.000 --> 30:27.200]  is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.200 --> 30:32.840]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.840 --> 30:34.980]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:34.980 --> 30:40.600]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[30:40.600 --> 30:42.320]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.320 --> 30:44.320]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.320 --> 30:50.440]  What if I told you scientists had developed a genetically modified corn, and if women
[30:50.440 --> 30:52.040]  eat it, they become sterile?
[30:52.040 --> 30:56.520]  Well, you probably said, I've been watching too many sci-fi movies, but they've actually
[30:56.520 --> 30:57.520]  done it.
[30:57.520 --> 31:02.680]  In a hothouse of a San Diego biotech firm called EpiSight, researchers discovered a
[31:02.680 --> 31:06.360]  rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm.
[31:06.360 --> 31:10.880]  They isolated the genes that manufacture these antibodies and then spliced them into corn
[31:10.880 --> 31:14.360]  plants to create contraceptive corn.
[31:14.360 --> 31:18.920]  The company promises it won't grow this corn near other crops, but I don't buy it.
[31:18.920 --> 31:23.160]  After all, they told us the Fukushima nuclear reactor could be contained too.
[31:23.160 --> 31:31.360]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.360 --> 31:36.720]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[31:36.720 --> 31:38.880]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.880 --> 31:43.800]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.800 --> 31:46.520]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:46.520 --> 31:49.240]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[31:49.240 --> 31:50.600]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.600 --> 31:51.600]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.600 --> 31:53.080]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:53.080 --> 31:54.080]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:54.080 --> 31:55.720]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.720 --> 31:58.320]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.320 --> 32:01.560]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:01.560 --> 32:05.760]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.760 --> 32:08.080]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:08.080 --> 32:11.840]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand
[32:11.840 --> 32:13.200]  and defend our own rights.
[32:13.200 --> 32:16.760]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:16.760 --> 32:20.800]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.800 --> 32:24.640]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.640 --> 32:26.040]  our rights through due process.
[32:26.040 --> 32:29.960]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.960 --> 32:33.720]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.720 --> 32:36.120]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.120 --> 32:40.120]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:40.120 --> 32:41.440]  ordering your copy today.
[32:41.440 --> 32:44.800]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.800 --> 32:49.200]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:49.200 --> 32:51.520]  documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.520 --> 32:55.480]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.480 --> 33:02.480]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:55.480 --> 34:10.920]  Okay, we are back.
[34:10.920 --> 34:15.200]  Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin.
[34:15.200 --> 34:20.080]  Well, over the break, did you come up with something insightful and innovative?
[34:20.080 --> 34:27.960]  Well, one of the observations on your haystack, I would say it isn't so much it was minor.
[34:27.960 --> 34:32.840]  I would say it goes to one of the things you said about taking the state to the fed and
[34:32.840 --> 34:34.580]  the fed to the state.
[34:34.580 --> 34:44.000]  By invoking that federal right, I think that made them more nervous than being so minor.
[34:44.000 --> 34:53.160]  And to that end, not only would you have this issue of the judge shielding from prosecution,
[34:53.160 --> 34:56.240]  you'd also have federal obstruction of justice charges.
[34:56.240 --> 35:00.400]  So while you're thinking of this thing to write it up, how would you write it up then
[35:00.400 --> 35:03.000]  to make sure that you get the fed charges?
[35:03.000 --> 35:08.240]  So suddenly you're taking state actors for non-enforcing the state law to the fed.
[35:08.240 --> 35:19.520]  That's easy, you get a state actor not enforcing a law that goes to one of your constitutional
[35:19.520 --> 35:20.520]  rights.
[35:20.520 --> 35:23.440]  That's a procedural due process violation.
[35:23.440 --> 35:30.880]  It's harm per se, and it's criminal in the fed, 18 U.S. Code 242.
[35:30.880 --> 35:33.440]  It's really easy to get them.
[35:33.440 --> 35:39.320]  I mean, they fight more laws than we can count.
[35:39.320 --> 35:40.320]  Keep telling people.
[35:40.320 --> 35:42.040]  Counting them three times.
[35:42.040 --> 35:43.040]  Yeah.
[35:43.040 --> 35:48.960]  You had the same experience, finding things to charge them with, that's a piece of cake.
[35:48.960 --> 35:56.240]  I look for things to artfully charge them with, where they look around and say, I didn't
[35:56.240 --> 35:58.800]  see that coming.
[35:58.800 --> 36:06.240]  Like the thing with the hearing aid thing, I'm sure the smart mouth, arrogant judge didn't
[36:06.240 --> 36:14.680]  see that one coming, and the more you can catch them doing stuff they do every day without
[36:14.680 --> 36:22.160]  thinking about it, and then sting them for it, we want to put them on their toes.
[36:22.160 --> 36:28.720]  We want them worrying every time Mark walks into the courthouse, what is he setting me
[36:28.720 --> 36:36.840]  up for this time, so that they get very, very careful.
[36:36.840 --> 36:41.320]  I want my public officials very, very careful.
[36:41.320 --> 36:45.120]  If they need role aids, take role aids.
[36:45.120 --> 36:49.200]  Handle your heartburn and your stress, but stay very, very careful.
[36:49.200 --> 36:58.080]  So I guess I need to upgrade the technology a bit, start building some routines that people
[36:58.080 --> 37:00.080]  can specifically follow.
[37:00.080 --> 37:02.080]  All right.
[37:02.080 --> 37:11.840]  If you build me a couple for Wisconsin, then I'll plagiarize them for other states.
[37:11.840 --> 37:12.840]  Do my best.
[37:12.840 --> 37:17.320]  You answered my question whether or not there was something hanging out in the weeds that
[37:17.320 --> 37:18.320]  you were aware of.
[37:18.320 --> 37:24.600]  It doesn't sound like there is anything hanging in the weeds in perjury as far as someone
[37:24.600 --> 37:30.200]  making the argument that it was the legislature stepping into the realm of the court room.
[37:30.200 --> 37:38.480]  So I guess I can stop hunting that rabbit trail and take a look.
[37:38.480 --> 37:44.600]  I think subordination of perjury is a great one.
[37:44.600 --> 37:46.920]  That lets you land on the judge.
[37:46.920 --> 37:56.120]  Yeah, well, there's definitely enough oddities in the particular thing that I'm chasing that
[37:56.120 --> 37:59.880]  I should be able to make good political hay.
[37:59.880 --> 38:07.960]  I'm trying to pick targets that not many people politically are going to defend.
[38:07.960 --> 38:10.600]  It makes it a little easier.
[38:10.600 --> 38:11.600]  Yes.
[38:11.600 --> 38:12.600]  So.
[38:12.600 --> 38:17.960]  It goes to the fact that everything's political.
[38:17.960 --> 38:22.840]  That's exactly why I'm picking targets that politically no one's going to be stepping
[38:22.840 --> 38:25.800]  up to go, oh, that was just a little mistake.
[38:25.800 --> 38:35.560]  When I've got people with long-term patterns, it makes it real hard for them to have sympathy.
[38:35.560 --> 38:41.520]  The judges are the perfect one because of all the people who could make mistakes, the judges
[38:41.520 --> 38:47.240]  may make them, but he's the last one who can defend them.
[38:47.240 --> 38:48.240]  Okay.
[38:48.240 --> 38:49.240]  Okay.
[38:49.240 --> 38:50.240]  All right.
[38:50.240 --> 38:53.000]  That's it for this evening.
[38:53.000 --> 38:56.800]  Thank you much for the conversation and the things to think about there.
[38:56.800 --> 38:57.800]  Okay.
[38:57.800 --> 38:58.800]  Thank you, Mark.
[38:58.800 --> 39:00.320]  Now we're going to go to Oliver in Tennessee.
[39:00.320 --> 39:01.320]  Hello, Oliver.
[39:01.320 --> 39:02.320]  Hello.
[39:02.320 --> 39:06.120]  What do you have for us today?
[39:06.120 --> 39:15.560]  Well, I sent you another copy of the suit, but I haven't finished it all the way, but
[39:15.560 --> 39:22.120]  I finished it enough for you to look at to let me know if I'm on the right track because
[39:22.120 --> 39:25.120]  it's a lot of things to put together.
[39:25.120 --> 39:31.920]  But I'm concerned about another situation that's going on in this town.
[39:31.920 --> 39:36.360]  You know how they force you to take an attorney or accept an attorney to go through the court
[39:36.360 --> 39:37.360]  process?
[39:37.360 --> 39:46.040]  And if they find you indigent, they turn around and still charge you fees and fines.
[39:46.040 --> 39:49.040]  How does that happen?
[39:49.040 --> 39:59.720]  Have you read the code in Tennessee concerning the inability to pay?
[39:59.720 --> 40:05.440]  No, I have not, but I'm following you.
[40:05.440 --> 40:13.000]  Well, see, even if you're indigent, there are certain things that the court considers
[40:13.000 --> 40:22.760]  to be voluntary or optional.
[40:22.760 --> 40:28.080]  That if it's something that's not necessarily a part of the case, sometimes they can charge
[40:28.080 --> 40:37.640]  and you'd have to look at the actual code for inability to pay and see if there are
[40:37.640 --> 40:38.640]  any exclusions.
[40:38.640 --> 40:51.000]  So in that statute, everything will be conclusive as in what they can do outside of any of the
[40:51.000 --> 40:52.000]  pay?
[40:52.000 --> 41:00.640]  Always when I bring an accusation, I never bring a general accusation.
[41:00.640 --> 41:08.400]  So if I felt like they were charging fees improperly, I would state that they brought
[41:08.400 --> 41:16.920]  this particular fee in violation of this particular statute.
[41:16.920 --> 41:30.080]  So first thing you have to do is read the statute, see what it says concerning the inability
[41:30.080 --> 41:31.080]  to pay.
[41:31.080 --> 41:36.480]  Is that something that you bring to the court or is that something that you can file suit
[41:36.480 --> 41:37.480]  for?
[41:37.480 --> 41:46.400]  Oh, this is something that you file criminally for because that's someone collecting a fee
[41:46.400 --> 41:49.120]  that they don't have a right to.
[41:49.120 --> 41:58.320]  Okay, I'm looking at your case and you have a way to go.
[41:58.320 --> 42:01.640]  Or you just have, you started out writing the case.
[42:01.640 --> 42:07.680]  You need to pull up some civil suits and look at all of the preliminary things that you
[42:07.680 --> 42:09.720]  have to do.
[42:09.720 --> 42:14.040]  You've got a heading on it, you've got a case number, your formatting is a little bit messed
[42:14.040 --> 42:19.760]  up.
[42:19.760 --> 42:28.000]  You need to start out with a brief statement of what the case is, you tell the judge what
[42:28.000 --> 42:29.000]  you're going to tell him.
[42:29.000 --> 42:32.240]  You tell him, this is what this case is going to be about.
[42:32.240 --> 42:36.920]  And then you say, these are who the parties are for the section for parties.
[42:36.920 --> 42:41.120]  And then you say, this is how you have jurisdiction in the case.
[42:41.120 --> 42:44.680]  No, I've done that, I've done that.
[42:44.680 --> 42:45.680]  I've redone it.
[42:45.680 --> 42:48.480]  You looked at it once and you told me that.
[42:48.480 --> 42:51.840]  No, I've got the one you just sent me.
[42:51.840 --> 42:52.840]  Okay.
[42:52.840 --> 42:56.320]  No, I added on to it.
[42:56.320 --> 42:58.760]  I added on, you have to go further down.
[42:58.760 --> 42:59.760]  Yeah.
[42:59.760 --> 43:00.760]  No, no.
[43:00.760 --> 43:01.760]  Okay.
[43:01.760 --> 43:11.040]  These things, brief statement of the case first, party second, jurisdiction third, always.
[43:11.040 --> 43:15.880]  They have to be right at the top.
[43:15.880 --> 43:19.640]  You got to tell the judge what the case is about.
[43:19.640 --> 43:26.760]  And he can look at that and say, this should fall within my jurisdiction.
[43:26.760 --> 43:33.680]  And then you tell him who the parties are, and then you tell him precisely why he has
[43:33.680 --> 43:34.680]  jurisdiction.
[43:34.680 --> 43:42.440]  He's not going to read past that if you don't, and then you go to a statement of facts.
[43:42.440 --> 43:47.200]  And if the statement of facts is large, you can refer to the statement of facts as an
[43:47.200 --> 43:51.480]  attachment, as an attached affidavit.
[43:51.480 --> 43:55.040]  And then you go to causes of action.
[43:55.040 --> 43:56.040]  Okay.
[43:56.040 --> 44:07.920]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come buy
[44:07.920 --> 44:12.880]  our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas, buying Brave New
[44:12.880 --> 44:16.760]  Books and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very
[44:16.760 --> 44:17.760]  own eyes.
[44:17.760 --> 44:22.600]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.600 --> 44:26.520]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil,
[44:26.520 --> 44:30.320]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[44:30.320 --> 44:43.160]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com, that's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.160 --> 45:01.280]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.280 --> 45:04.440]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.440 --> 45:11.240]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[45:11.240 --> 45:14.240]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:14.240 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.240]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.240 --> 45:28.080]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.080 --> 45:34.880]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.880 --> 45:39.480]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[45:39.480 --> 45:43.680]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.680 --> 45:49.880]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.880 --> 45:52.080]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.080 --> 46:14.960]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:14.960 --> 46:35.280]  Okay.
[46:35.280 --> 46:36.280]  We are back.
[46:36.280 --> 46:41.560]  Brandon Kelton, Debra Stevens at Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Oliver in Texas.
[46:41.560 --> 46:53.200]  And Oliver, I'm reading your complaint, and it doesn't make sense to me.
[46:53.200 --> 46:58.160]  You have to write your complaint for an eighth grader.
[46:58.160 --> 47:03.040]  And when you write the complaint, you have to assume that the person reading it doesn't
[47:03.040 --> 47:08.640]  know anything about your case at all.
[47:08.640 --> 47:16.600]  So you have to be specific, and you have to be somewhat pedantic.
[47:16.600 --> 47:21.800]  I'm reading this case, and it starts out, action to recover personal property.
[47:21.800 --> 47:26.840]  It says 1, then 29-30-101.
[47:26.840 --> 47:29.840]  What is 29-30-101?
[47:29.840 --> 47:34.600]  Oh, hold on, hold on.
[47:34.600 --> 47:40.200]  I've got your page covered up, so I cover, caller page is covered up, so I didn't have
[47:40.200 --> 47:41.200]  you unmuted.
[47:41.200 --> 47:42.200]  Okay.
[47:42.200 --> 47:43.200]  What is 29-30-101?
[47:43.200 --> 47:44.200]  Inverse condemnation.
[47:44.200 --> 47:57.680]  Here in your criminal, in your document, the very first sentence after the heading says
[47:57.680 --> 48:04.760]  1, and then it's got 29-30-101, action to recover personal property.
[48:04.760 --> 48:05.760]  What is 29-30-101?
[48:05.760 --> 48:06.760]  Oh, yeah.
[48:06.760 --> 48:07.760]  That's the action.
[48:07.760 --> 48:08.760]  It's a, what is that?
[48:08.760 --> 48:20.120]  That is, they said it's an action to recover personal property that has been taken without
[48:20.120 --> 48:21.120]  a...
[48:21.120 --> 48:22.120]  Where did you get that?
[48:22.120 --> 48:24.120]  Did you pull those numbers out of the septic tank?
[48:24.120 --> 48:25.120]  No, no.
[48:25.120 --> 48:27.920]  It came out of the CCA code.
[48:27.920 --> 48:28.920]  Okay.
[48:28.920 --> 48:29.920]  Why isn't that in here?
[48:29.920 --> 48:36.720]  I guess I wrote it out and I see what you're saying.
[48:36.720 --> 48:37.720]  Okay.
[48:37.720 --> 48:43.400]  I, because I'm reading this and I have no idea what you're talking about.
[48:43.400 --> 48:47.320]  You've got these numbers in front of everything and I don't know what any of those numbers
[48:47.320 --> 48:48.320]  are.
[48:48.320 --> 48:49.320]  So...
[48:49.320 --> 48:53.120]  I figured the judge wouldn't notice them since he dealt with them all day.
[48:53.120 --> 48:59.520]  No, no, you don't get to figure that the judge will just automatically know what you're doing
[48:59.520 --> 49:00.520]  here.
[49:00.520 --> 49:03.080]  Nobody ever does that.
[49:03.080 --> 49:13.720]  If you want to cite the code, then you put action to recover personal property under
[49:13.720 --> 49:18.840]  whatever the name of the code is and then this citation.
[49:18.840 --> 49:20.520]  So he'll know what you're talking about.
[49:20.520 --> 49:25.200]  Look, you need to... have you read any civil suits?
[49:25.200 --> 49:27.200]  Um, versions.
[49:27.200 --> 49:31.920]  I'm not from the...
[49:31.920 --> 49:33.120]  Okay, look.
[49:33.120 --> 49:39.840]  If you were having to write the bulk of the information in your suit, you haven't done
[49:39.840 --> 49:40.840]  enough homework.
[49:40.840 --> 49:41.840]  No, no, no, no.
[49:41.840 --> 49:42.840]  I didn't write it.
[49:42.840 --> 49:45.840]  I took it from other suits.
[49:45.840 --> 49:46.840]  Okay.
[49:46.840 --> 49:51.720]  Well, I'm looking at the first part.
[49:51.720 --> 49:58.240]  All the information I took from other suits that have already been decided on in the Telecourt
[49:58.240 --> 50:02.840]  and in the Supreme Court.
[50:02.840 --> 50:05.480]  Okay.
[50:05.480 --> 50:08.320]  You need some...
[50:08.320 --> 50:20.360]  You need your technology, Microsoft Word technology upgrade a bit to get the formatting down.
[50:20.360 --> 50:27.360]  I probably should do a show on some of the basic techniques for Word so that you could
[50:27.360 --> 50:29.520]  get these things to look better.
[50:29.520 --> 50:30.520]  Okay.
[50:30.520 --> 50:40.120]  So you start it out with action to recover personal property, inverse condemnation, conversion
[50:40.120 --> 50:57.040]  according to Code 1983, civil rights violations of... and then you jump to another line.
[50:57.040 --> 50:58.720]  You really have to read this.
[50:58.720 --> 51:03.040]  You have to read it like you've never seen it.
[51:03.040 --> 51:04.880]  Judges are very, very busy.
[51:04.880 --> 51:08.800]  They read lots of documents.
[51:08.800 --> 51:17.240]  You need to take a civil action and make yours look just like other civil actions.
[51:17.240 --> 51:19.600]  Get three or four civil cases and look at them.
[51:19.600 --> 51:22.800]  They're all the same.
[51:22.800 --> 51:32.040]  The judge picks the civil action up and he wants to see what he expects to see where
[51:32.040 --> 51:37.480]  he expects to see it because he's in a hurry.
[51:37.480 --> 51:39.720]  He's got a lot to do.
[51:39.720 --> 51:44.440]  He's going to read your brief statement of the case and then he's going to glance over
[51:44.440 --> 51:45.440]  the parties.
[51:45.440 --> 51:49.160]  He's going to glance over the venue, pay almost no way.
[51:49.160 --> 51:54.000]  If everything looks... he's got a picture in his mind of what venue looks like.
[51:54.000 --> 51:56.640]  If yours looks like what he sees, he won't even read it.
[51:56.640 --> 52:01.240]  He'll just jump right over it and then he wants to go to causes of action.
[52:01.240 --> 52:05.480]  What are your causes of action?
[52:05.480 --> 52:07.920]  Causes of action.
[52:07.920 --> 52:13.920]  Causes of action doesn't mean bad things the other guy did to me.
[52:13.920 --> 52:21.480]  When you are in a criminal case, the criminal case generally has one cause of action and
[52:21.480 --> 52:28.720]  that's the criminal statute or allegation of violation of a criminal statute.
[52:28.720 --> 52:39.240]  In civil cases, you have something similar to statutes but they're called causes of action
[52:39.240 --> 52:48.480]  and whatever your claim is, whatever happened, you have to frame what happened in terms of
[52:48.480 --> 52:51.800]  one of the defined causes of action.
[52:51.800 --> 52:59.960]  Have you looked into Tennessee law to find what the defined causes of action for the
[52:59.960 --> 53:02.240]  state of Tennessee are?
[53:02.240 --> 53:03.880]  Yes.
[53:03.880 --> 53:17.920]  Okay, each accusation you make, you put down cause of action 1 and then you state the facts
[53:17.920 --> 53:22.200]  in the terms of the cause of action.
[53:22.200 --> 53:29.840]  Each cause of action is going to have a number of elements and you want to state each...
[53:29.840 --> 53:36.040]  State your facts so that they address each element in turn and when you look up the cause
[53:36.040 --> 53:43.800]  of action, if you find a practice manual or litigation guide, they will list the causes
[53:43.800 --> 53:50.040]  of action in order and the causes of action, I mean the elements of the cause of action,
[53:50.040 --> 53:56.880]  they will list in order and they are in a logical order.
[53:56.880 --> 54:04.920]  So you should address your facts to those elements in the order they normally fall in
[54:04.920 --> 54:13.360]  when you see them in the litigation guides and that's because that's the way the judge
[54:13.360 --> 54:16.560]  is going to expect to see them.
[54:16.560 --> 54:22.400]  If you have one out of place or if you missed one, the judge is going to trip over, it's
[54:22.400 --> 54:30.320]  going to knock him out of flow and he's going to lose an overall understanding of what you're
[54:30.320 --> 54:31.320]  putting in your document.
[54:31.320 --> 54:34.320]  Am I making sense Oliver?
[54:34.320 --> 54:35.320]  Right.
[54:35.320 --> 54:42.880]  Okay, it's real important that when he reads this, he finds what he expects to find where
[54:42.880 --> 54:50.080]  he expects to find it and that's not anywhere near as complex as it sounds.
[54:50.080 --> 55:00.680]  There's just a relatively limited structure that these things should fall into and while
[55:00.680 --> 55:09.960]  I don't have time to do all this on the show, I will go through this and I will reformat
[55:09.960 --> 55:15.840]  it so that you can see how this formatting works.
[55:15.840 --> 55:22.240]  I see that you have spaced things over to the middle of the page and one line you use
[55:22.240 --> 55:26.080]  the space bar and another line you use tabs.
[55:26.080 --> 55:27.080]  Right.
[55:27.080 --> 55:38.960]  In Microsoft Word, if you go to the home tab, across the top, you'll have first section
[55:38.960 --> 55:47.520]  is for the font and then there's a section for numbering and bullet points and then the
[55:47.520 --> 56:00.000]  third section are headings or styles listed as styles and always use these styles.
[56:00.000 --> 56:07.040]  If you want something numbered, you pick a style that has numbering in it, you go to
[56:07.040 --> 56:17.400]  the numbering section and pick one of the formats for the numbering that will have a
[56:17.400 --> 56:23.880]  style the way you see in legal documents and there's one particular one in there that I
[56:23.880 --> 56:24.880]  always use.
[56:24.880 --> 56:33.680]  It starts with a capital, we're using Roman numerals in caps as the first heading and
[56:33.680 --> 56:39.680]  then the second heading starts with an A, third one with a one, fourth with a small
[56:39.680 --> 56:47.560]  A, then a one in brackets, a small A in double brackets but each one of these is a separate
[56:47.560 --> 56:55.280]  end end, it's a separate subheading and use these coopiously.
[56:55.280 --> 57:02.160]  The headings do a couple of things, one is they break up the document and in each place
[57:02.160 --> 57:05.760]  it gives the reader direction.
[57:05.760 --> 57:10.160]  Here's what I'm going to talk about next, first I'm going to talk about a brief statement
[57:10.160 --> 57:13.880]  of the case and that's main heading one.
[57:13.880 --> 57:17.920]  Main heading two, I'm going to tell you who the parties are, main heading three, that'll
[57:17.920 --> 57:21.960]  be jurisdiction, then I'm going to tell you what your jurisdiction is, then I'm going
[57:21.960 --> 57:29.560]  to go to causes of action, main heading four and then subheading A, first cause of action,
[57:29.560 --> 57:35.320]  now the judge knows exactly where he's at in the overall scheme of the document and
[57:35.320 --> 57:39.520]  he can go down it and then he can back up and refine these places really easy because
[57:39.520 --> 57:42.000]  you got nice outline headings.
[57:42.000 --> 57:51.920]  Wait a minute, I'm getting a lot of background noise there Oliver.
[57:51.920 --> 58:01.200]  Then using these headings also creates a table of contents, you can go up to the top and
[58:01.200 --> 58:09.360]  under view, pick navigation pane, it's the second section over, it has router, guidelines,
[58:09.360 --> 58:16.360]  navigation pane, if you click navigation pane, it pops up a second window, if you ever do
[58:16.360 --> 58:23.560]  any search and replace, that's actually done in the navigation pane, but if you pick the
[58:23.560 --> 58:30.960]  first item in the navigation pane, it will give you a table of contents, so all these
[58:30.960 --> 58:37.800]  headings you can use will be in that navigation pane, so especially if you have a big document,
[58:37.800 --> 58:42.640]  you can go down it and click on one of those items and it will jump you to that location
[58:42.640 --> 58:50.320]  in the document, very, very helpful, not only to you.
[58:50.320 --> 58:55.760]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.760 --> 58:58.560]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.560 --> 59:03.960]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:03.960 --> 59:07.200]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.200 --> 59:13.560]  Here the recovery version, first this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.560 --> 59:20.000]  but the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes, difficult and profound passages
[59:20.000 --> 59:25.440]  are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond
[59:25.440 --> 59:28.320]  what you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.320 --> 59:33.480]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking,
[59:33.480 --> 59:43.920]  this comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.920 --> 59:47.960]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.960 --> 59:48.960]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:48.960 --> 01:00:02.840]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.840 --> 01:00:07.680]  You're following these flashes brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the
[01:00:07.680 --> 01:00:14.960]  jelly bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside
[01:00:14.960 --> 01:00:23.360]  scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:23.360 --> 01:00:29.240]  Markets for Wednesday, July 20th, 2016 are currently trading with gold at $1,318.42 an
[01:00:29.240 --> 01:00:36.040]  ounce, silver $19.53 an ounce, Texas crude $44.65 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[01:00:36.040 --> 01:00:44.880]  sitting at about $667 U.S. currency.
[01:00:44.880 --> 01:00:50.720]  Today in history, the year 1977, the Central Intelligence Agency releases 20,000 documents
[01:00:50.720 --> 01:00:55.480]  relating to Project MKUltra under the Freedom of Information Act, revealing that it engaged
[01:00:55.480 --> 01:01:02.320]  in mind control experiments, today in history.
[01:01:02.320 --> 01:01:06.560]  In recent news, Reuters and several human rights organizations, including the Syrian
[01:01:06.560 --> 01:01:11.520]  Observatory for Human Rights, SOHR, and Amnesty International have reported that anywhere
[01:01:11.520 --> 01:01:17.160]  between 56 and 160 civilians, including at least 11 children, were killed in a U.S.-led
[01:01:17.160 --> 01:01:19.040]  airstrike in Syria yesterday.
[01:01:19.040 --> 01:01:22.760]  It appears the strike had apparently hit a school that was sheltering displaced people
[01:01:22.760 --> 01:01:23.760]  from Syria.
[01:01:23.760 --> 01:01:29.320]  SOHR is reporting that at least 167 civilians have been killed so far in the city of Manbij
[01:01:29.320 --> 01:01:39.240]  since May, when the U.S.-led coalition started their campaign in the area.
[01:01:39.240 --> 01:01:42.880]  Researchers have published a new map of the brain detailing nearly 100 previously unknown
[01:01:42.880 --> 01:01:44.120]  regions today.
[01:01:44.120 --> 01:01:49.000]  Matthew F. Glasser, a neuroscientist at Washington University School of Medicine and lead author
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:54.180]  of the new research, said that, quote, �This map you should think of as a version 1.0.
[01:01:54.180 --> 01:01:58.840]  There may be a version 2.0 as the data gets better and more eyes look at the data.
[01:01:58.840 --> 01:02:01.920]  We hope the map can evolve as the science progresses.�
[01:02:01.920 --> 01:02:06.360]  Three years ago, Dr. Glasser and his colleagues set out to create a new, much more detailed
[01:02:06.360 --> 01:02:12.080]  and precise map of the human brain using data collected by the Human Connectum Project,
[01:02:12.080 --> 01:02:15.720]  where 1,200 volunteers were studied with powerful new brain scanners.
[01:02:15.720 --> 01:02:19.740]  The project team recorded high-resolution images of each participant�s brain and then
[01:02:19.740 --> 01:02:25.040]  recorded its activity during hours of tests on memory, language, and other kinds of thought.
[01:02:25.040 --> 01:02:28.520]  Scientists plan on using this new map to track the development of young brains and to look
[01:02:28.520 --> 01:02:32.920]  for changes caused by disorders like Alzheimer�s and other neurological disorders.
[01:02:32.920 --> 01:02:46.440]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors who should apply for the service
[01:02:46.440 --> 01:02:49.440]  you�d like to advertise with us.
[01:02:49.440 --> 01:02:52.440]  Feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257.
[01:02:52.440 --> 01:03:21.800]  Okay, we are
[01:03:21.800 --> 01:03:22.800]  back.
[01:03:22.800 --> 01:03:33.560]  I�ve been talking to Oliver in Tennessee and I�m having a little trouble finding
[01:03:33.560 --> 01:03:34.560]  you.
[01:03:34.560 --> 01:03:35.560]  You�ve got too many pages open.
[01:03:35.560 --> 01:03:42.400]  Oliver, I opened one of my documents that I use.
[01:03:42.400 --> 01:03:49.520]  I have a format that I use when I build cases and as a matter of fact, I will send you one
[01:03:49.520 --> 01:03:54.840]  of these so you can kind of see the process.
[01:03:54.840 --> 01:04:04.400]  What I�ve done is I took all of the content of your case and dropped it into this document.
[01:04:04.400 --> 01:04:08.960]  That way all of my styles and everything are already set up right.
[01:04:08.960 --> 01:04:15.840]  I�ll send you this document and restructure it so that you can see what I�m talking
[01:04:15.840 --> 01:04:19.680]  about here on how to use headings.
[01:04:19.680 --> 01:04:26.600]  There�s actually quite a bit to know to get your taste to look right but the first
[01:04:26.600 --> 01:04:32.880]  thing is this needs to be sorted out so it makes sense.
[01:04:32.880 --> 01:04:41.320]  Have you looked � what causes of action are you claiming in this case?
[01:04:41.320 --> 01:04:50.520]  Causes of action for recovery of personal property and inverse economy.
[01:04:50.520 --> 01:04:55.280]  What are the elements of the cause of action for recovery of personal property?
[01:04:55.280 --> 01:04:58.360]  It says chattel.
[01:04:58.360 --> 01:05:04.920]  I actually wrote it out in the document but it�s basically saying that the chattel or
[01:05:04.920 --> 01:05:12.800]  goods of belonging to a person is acquired by someone else unlawfully.
[01:05:12.800 --> 01:05:17.280]  Okay, I�m going down here trying to find it.
[01:05:17.280 --> 01:05:20.040]  I�ve got a whole bunch of these codes.
[01:05:20.040 --> 01:05:26.960]  You�ve got a bunch of codes put in here at the beginning.
[01:05:26.960 --> 01:05:29.240]  Why are those codes in there?
[01:05:29.240 --> 01:05:36.560]  This first document is just like I wrote it out so I could see what I�m looking at.
[01:05:36.560 --> 01:05:39.400]  I just wrote out things that I found in the TCA.
[01:05:39.400 --> 01:05:43.840]  Those are TCA codes and federal violations that I found.
[01:05:43.840 --> 01:05:45.880]  I�m touching the stick.
[01:05:45.880 --> 01:05:47.480]  This is not really the document.
[01:05:47.480 --> 01:05:50.280]  It�s not anything near what you intend to send.
[01:05:50.280 --> 01:05:52.880]  Yeah, I�m putting everything down on paper.
[01:05:52.880 --> 01:05:54.920]  Let me make a suggestion.
[01:05:54.920 --> 01:06:03.920]  You have here 29-20-205, removal of immunity for injury caused by negligent act or remission.
[01:06:03.920 --> 01:06:14.600]  Above that, put in a brief statement of why you dropped this statute in there.
[01:06:14.600 --> 01:06:15.600]  I did.
[01:06:15.600 --> 01:06:16.600]  Why?
[01:06:16.600 --> 01:06:17.600]  Okay.
[01:06:17.600 --> 01:06:18.600]  I can�t find it.
[01:06:18.600 --> 01:06:19.600]  I just see statute attached to statute.
[01:06:19.600 --> 01:06:26.680]  We can send it to you in the email so the email might have rearranged it.
[01:06:26.680 --> 01:06:27.680]  I�m sorry.
[01:06:27.680 --> 01:06:28.680]  No.
[01:06:28.680 --> 01:06:29.680]  I�ve seen one statute.
[01:06:29.680 --> 01:06:43.640]  I see 29-20-205, then 20-15-101, 20-15-102, 103, 104, 105, 106.
[01:06:43.640 --> 01:06:45.600]  You just dropped a whole bunch of statutes.
[01:06:45.600 --> 01:06:46.600]  Okay.
[01:06:46.600 --> 01:06:48.600]  This is not something you were going to file?
[01:06:48.600 --> 01:06:49.600]  No.
[01:06:49.600 --> 01:06:50.600]  No.
[01:06:50.600 --> 01:06:51.600]  No.
[01:06:51.600 --> 01:06:52.600]  You got to go further down.
[01:06:52.600 --> 01:06:53.600]  Go further down to the reading.
[01:06:53.600 --> 01:06:54.600]  Okay.
[01:06:54.600 --> 01:06:57.600]  Those are just things to keep my eye on while I�m researching.
[01:06:57.600 --> 01:06:58.600]  Okay.
[01:06:58.600 --> 01:07:03.600]  You have an argument for removal of immunity.
[01:07:03.600 --> 01:07:04.600]  Okay.
[01:07:04.600 --> 01:07:05.600]  Yeah.
[01:07:05.600 --> 01:07:13.600]  The first part I sent you earlier, you told me that was no good.
[01:07:13.600 --> 01:07:14.600]  Okay.
[01:07:14.600 --> 01:07:15.600]  Yeah.
[01:07:15.600 --> 01:07:16.600]  There was almost nothing in it.
[01:07:16.600 --> 01:07:17.600]  Okay.
[01:07:17.600 --> 01:07:20.360]  That�s the issue I�m having.
[01:07:20.360 --> 01:07:23.600]  You understand that the computer is not a typewriter.
[01:07:23.600 --> 01:07:24.600]  Right.
[01:07:24.600 --> 01:07:31.280]  You�re putting a carriage return at the end of every line.
[01:07:31.280 --> 01:07:33.000]  The computer will do that all by itself.
[01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:43.120]  The only time you put in a hard return is at the end of a paragraph.
[01:07:43.120 --> 01:07:44.120]  I don�t think I did that.
[01:07:44.120 --> 01:07:49.800]  I think it did that because of the email, my document wasn�t written up like that.
[01:07:49.800 --> 01:07:53.360]  Did you copy this from a PDF document?
[01:07:53.360 --> 01:07:54.360]  Oh, yes.
[01:07:54.360 --> 01:07:55.360]  Yeah, I did.
[01:07:55.360 --> 01:07:56.360]  Okay.
[01:07:56.360 --> 01:07:57.360]  Not all of it.
[01:07:57.360 --> 01:07:58.360]  Not all of it.
[01:07:58.360 --> 01:07:59.360]  Okay.
[01:07:59.360 --> 01:08:07.800]  If you copy something from a PDF document, it will put a carriage return at the end of
[01:08:07.800 --> 01:08:15.280]  every line and you need to go take those out and figure out where all the paragraphs are.
[01:08:15.280 --> 01:08:23.120]  You only leave a carriage return where there�s a paragraph.
[01:08:23.120 --> 01:08:28.360]  What I generally do is I copy from a PDF document.
[01:08:28.360 --> 01:08:35.760]  I�ll drop the text in my system and then I�ll go down the text and compare what I
[01:08:35.760 --> 01:08:39.680]  dropped in to the PDF that I was looking at.
[01:08:39.680 --> 01:08:45.040]  On the PDF, I can see where each paragraph starts and I go down and look for the start
[01:08:45.040 --> 01:08:54.480]  of that paragraph and then just above it, I put an extra carriage return.
[01:08:54.480 --> 01:09:01.600]  On the home tab of Word, in the second section, there is... Do you know what a paragraph
[01:09:01.600 --> 01:09:03.600]  character looks like?
[01:09:03.600 --> 01:09:08.840]  It�s two straight lines with a line across the top.
[01:09:08.840 --> 01:09:11.560]  It looks like a musical symbol.
[01:09:11.560 --> 01:09:12.560]  Okay.
[01:09:12.560 --> 01:09:23.040]  If you click that paragraph symbol, it will show the characters in your document.
[01:09:23.040 --> 01:09:25.840]  You can actually see all the carriage returns.
[01:09:25.840 --> 01:09:31.520]  Well, everywhere there�s a paragraph, just before the paragraph, you put an extra carriage
[01:09:31.520 --> 01:09:36.360]  return.
[01:09:36.360 --> 01:09:46.280]  Once you found all of your paragraphs, then you do a... You hit control F and then select
[01:09:46.280 --> 01:09:52.480]  �Find and Replace.�
[01:09:52.480 --> 01:10:02.000]  Or you have two paragraphs, you want to replace those with two tildes or maybe two Qs, something
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  that never comes up naturally.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:15.360]  Just put in two paragraph characters and that�s Shift 6, lowercase P. We�ll look for a paragraph
[01:10:15.360 --> 01:10:16.360]  character.
[01:10:16.360 --> 01:10:24.800]  You put that in twice and then you put in �Replace with QQ.� Then you do another
[01:10:24.800 --> 01:10:33.640]  search and replace for a paragraph character, just one, Shift 6, lowercase P, and replace
[01:10:33.640 --> 01:10:37.000]  with nothing.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:43.400]  That will take out all the single carriage returns and then you go back and do a search
[01:10:43.400 --> 01:10:47.800]  for QQ and replace it with a paragraph character and you get it all fixed.
[01:10:47.800 --> 01:10:48.800]  Did that make sense?
[01:10:48.800 --> 01:10:53.800]  Yeah, it probably didn�t make sense to me.
[01:10:53.800 --> 01:11:03.640]  You�re telling me that when I put a PDF file in there, don�t let it resemble a PDF
[01:11:03.640 --> 01:11:04.640]  file.
[01:11:04.640 --> 01:11:05.640]  I have to make it...
[01:11:05.640 --> 01:11:06.640]  Well, no.
[01:11:06.640 --> 01:11:11.660]  Just your document doesn�t format itself correctly.
[01:11:11.660 --> 01:11:14.240]  It comes up all confused.
[01:11:14.240 --> 01:11:20.240]  If you take out all those carriage returns, you can just take each one out manually except
[01:11:20.240 --> 01:11:28.280]  where there�s an end of a paragraph, then you put it back so that it just reads correctly.
[01:11:28.280 --> 01:11:33.160]  I�m looking at this and it�s like one huge document.
[01:11:33.160 --> 01:11:39.280]  There are no breaks in it anywhere that give me a headache to try to read it.
[01:11:39.280 --> 01:11:45.960]  So apparently, you pretty well understand causes of action.
[01:11:45.960 --> 01:11:46.960]  Right.
[01:11:46.960 --> 01:11:47.960]  Okay.
[01:11:47.960 --> 01:11:48.960]  Okay.
[01:11:48.960 --> 01:12:02.040]  If I�m reading this right, I only see one cause of action and that�s removal of immunity.
[01:12:02.040 --> 01:12:04.480]  Is that your only cause of action?
[01:12:04.480 --> 01:12:11.160]  No, it�s recovery of private property and inverse condemnation.
[01:12:11.160 --> 01:12:12.160]  Wait a minute.
[01:12:12.160 --> 01:12:16.320]  I�m having a terrible time understanding you.
[01:12:16.320 --> 01:12:22.960]  Inverse condemnation and recovery of personal property.
[01:12:22.960 --> 01:12:26.400]  What is inverse condemnation?
[01:12:26.400 --> 01:12:34.960]  Inverse condemnation is when the government calls a taking of your property, of private
[01:12:34.960 --> 01:12:35.960]  property.
[01:12:35.960 --> 01:12:36.960]  Okay.
[01:12:36.960 --> 01:12:39.840]  What are the elements?
[01:12:39.840 --> 01:12:52.040]  The elements is government employees take personal property for public use or without
[01:12:52.040 --> 01:12:53.040]  consent.
[01:12:53.040 --> 01:12:54.040]  Okay.
[01:12:54.040 --> 01:12:55.040]  Good.
[01:12:55.040 --> 01:12:57.360]  I was just about to ask that question.
[01:12:57.360 --> 01:12:58.360]  Fourth Amendment taking.
[01:12:58.360 --> 01:13:02.640]  It�s a Fourth Amendment taking and Fourteenth Amendment due process.
[01:13:02.640 --> 01:13:09.240]  They didn�t take me to court or anything, no authority, no written authority to tow
[01:13:09.240 --> 01:13:11.760]  the vehicles or any of that.
[01:13:11.760 --> 01:13:12.760]  Okay.
[01:13:12.760 --> 01:13:13.760]  This is okay.
[01:13:13.760 --> 01:13:19.320]  They took without your authority and that�s what it amounts to is a Fourth Amendment taking
[01:13:19.320 --> 01:13:26.840]  and with no hearing, no due process, that�s a procedural due process.
[01:13:26.840 --> 01:13:31.440]  That will get you right in the fat court.
[01:13:31.440 --> 01:13:35.240]  The taking is considered the inverse condemnation in Tennessee.
[01:13:35.240 --> 01:13:43.200]  It�s actually in civil proceedings that I read already.
[01:13:43.200 --> 01:13:44.200]  That was an unusual term.
[01:13:44.200 --> 01:13:46.200]  I�ve never heard that term before.
[01:13:46.200 --> 01:13:48.320]  It�s called inverse condemnation.
[01:13:48.320 --> 01:13:51.920]  Inverse condemnation is when the government condemns your property and take it and pay
[01:13:51.920 --> 01:13:56.560]  you for it, but inverse condemnation is when the government damage your property, takes
[01:13:56.560 --> 01:14:03.880]  it without permission or anything that deprives the owner of any type of right.
[01:14:03.880 --> 01:14:06.520]  It�s called inverse condemnation.
[01:14:06.520 --> 01:14:07.520]  Interesting.
[01:14:07.520 --> 01:14:16.880]  You can use inverse condemnation on a denial of a statutory due process, right?
[01:14:16.880 --> 01:14:25.800]  Inverse condemnation, if they regulate your property, like they say, �We�re not going
[01:14:25.800 --> 01:14:28.360]  to allow you to split up your land.�
[01:14:28.360 --> 01:14:29.360]  Okay.
[01:14:29.360 --> 01:14:37.480]  Inverse condemnation goes specifically to a denial of right concerning real property?
[01:14:37.480 --> 01:14:38.480]  Yes.
[01:14:38.480 --> 01:14:39.480]  Yes.
[01:14:39.480 --> 01:14:40.480]  Okay.
[01:14:40.480 --> 01:14:41.480]  Hold on.
[01:14:41.480 --> 01:14:44.440]  I need to be careful about my definitions.
[01:14:44.440 --> 01:14:49.320]  I said real property, about property, real or otherwise.
[01:14:49.320 --> 01:14:52.320]  Real property means real estate.
[01:14:52.320 --> 01:14:53.320]  Right.
[01:14:53.320 --> 01:14:56.520]  Any property that is not owned by the government.
[01:14:56.520 --> 01:14:57.520]  Okay.
[01:14:57.520 --> 01:14:58.520]  Good.
[01:14:58.520 --> 01:15:05.480]  Inverse condemnation and what was the other one?
[01:15:05.480 --> 01:15:14.360]  Action to recover a personal property because of the violations of those Tennessee codes
[01:15:14.360 --> 01:15:17.040]  and I didn�t give them permission to tow my vehicles.
[01:15:17.040 --> 01:15:21.760]  They have no written authority to hold my vehicles either.
[01:15:21.760 --> 01:15:22.760]  Okay.
[01:15:22.760 --> 01:15:28.840]  Procedural due process is a cause or breach of due process is a cause of action.
[01:15:28.840 --> 01:15:29.840]  Right.
[01:15:29.840 --> 01:15:35.920]  I have that on that too, 14th Amendment.
[01:15:35.920 --> 01:15:46.560]  Wait a minute, I don�t see, no, 14th Amendment is not, hold on, you can�t call it that
[01:15:46.560 --> 01:15:47.560]  way.
[01:15:47.560 --> 01:15:48.560]  Okay.
[01:15:48.560 --> 01:15:54.760]  You have to name cause of action for due process violation.
[01:15:54.760 --> 01:15:57.440]  Due process violation is harm per se.
[01:15:57.440 --> 01:16:02.280]  You don�t have to show that you were harmed by a denial of due process.
[01:16:02.280 --> 01:16:04.640]  It�s harm per se.
[01:16:04.640 --> 01:16:15.880]  And then you don�t have the emotional distress, you had an emotional bond to all those cars
[01:16:15.880 --> 01:16:16.880]  out there.
[01:16:16.880 --> 01:16:17.880]  You had them all named.
[01:16:17.880 --> 01:16:18.880]  It�s written further down.
[01:16:18.880 --> 01:16:21.880]  The emotional despair is written further down.
[01:16:21.880 --> 01:16:22.880]  Okay.
[01:16:22.880 --> 01:16:33.600]  It�s hard to tell anything from this is the way it�s all jumbled together so I�m
[01:16:33.600 --> 01:16:36.120]  having a little trouble trying to sort the pieces out.
[01:16:36.120 --> 01:16:37.120]  Okay.
[01:16:37.120 --> 01:16:38.120]  Hang on, about to go to break.
[01:16:38.120 --> 01:16:41.120]  Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, we live by radio.
[01:16:41.120 --> 01:16:45.680]  At least this time I�m not going to fall off the cliff like I have the last couple
[01:16:45.680 --> 01:16:46.680]  of times.
[01:16:46.680 --> 01:16:47.680]  I call at number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:47.680 --> 01:16:48.680]  Give us a call.
[01:16:48.680 --> 01:17:00.680]  We have another 43 segments so we�ll be right back.
[01:17:00.680 --> 01:17:07.680]  We�ll be right back.
[01:17:07.680 --> 01:17:08.680]  Okay.
[01:17:08.680 --> 01:17:09.680]  Thank you.
[01:17:09.680 --> 01:17:10.680]  Thank you.
[01:17:10.680 --> 01:17:11.680]  Thank you.
[01:17:11.680 --> 01:17:12.680]  Thank you.
[01:17:12.680 --> 01:17:13.680]  Thank you.
[01:17:13.680 --> 01:17:34.720]  We�ll be right back.
[01:17:34.720 --> 01:17:58.240]  We�ll be right back.
[01:17:58.240 --> 01:18:26.040]  We�ll be right back.
[01:18:26.040 --> 01:18:50.600]  We�ll be right back.
[01:18:50.600 --> 01:19:07.880]  We�ll be right back.
[01:19:07.880 --> 01:19:35.880]  We�ll be right back.
[01:19:35.880 --> 01:19:44.880]  I was blindsided, but now I can see your plans You put the fear in my pocket, took the money
[01:19:44.880 --> 01:19:51.880]  from my hands Ain�t gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:19:51.880 --> 01:20:18.360]  Ain�t gonna fool me with that same old sucker-punch I get it now, but then I must
[01:20:18.360 --> 01:20:19.360]  Okay.
[01:20:19.360 --> 01:20:22.360]  We�ll be right back.
[01:20:22.360 --> 01:20:26.880]  Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we�re talking to Oliver in Tennessee,
[01:20:26.880 --> 01:20:33.000]  and Oliver probably need to sort this out a little bit more before we spend much more
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:34.000]  time on it.
[01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:39.600]  I�m kind of confused and I hadn�t had time to read beforehand, so I�m just kind
[01:20:39.600 --> 01:20:43.080]  of struggling here to get it sorted out.
[01:20:43.080 --> 01:20:57.120]  So you have a claim of reverse condemnation, a claim of � what was the second one � recover
[01:20:57.120 --> 01:21:09.200]  personal property, and then due process should be a separate cause of action, and pain and
[01:21:09.200 --> 01:21:20.320]  suffering and costs.� Oh, and your mic�s not making a lot of noise this time, and that�s
[01:21:20.320 --> 01:21:21.800]  because I got you muted.
[01:21:21.800 --> 01:21:23.240]  Okay, go ahead, Oliver.
[01:21:23.240 --> 01:21:26.240]  I�m sorry I had you muted there.
[01:21:26.240 --> 01:21:29.240]  No, I�m listening.
[01:21:29.240 --> 01:21:30.240]  Okay.
[01:21:30.240 --> 01:21:41.240]  So, work on that, I will format this one and send you back the document in a formatted
[01:21:41.240 --> 01:21:47.160]  version, and then maybe next week you call in and I�ll show you how to use the formatted
[01:21:47.160 --> 01:21:48.160]  version.
[01:21:48.160 --> 01:21:56.280]  I�ll show you how to use the headers and how to do quotes and how to set up the document
[01:21:56.280 --> 01:21:59.280]  so it�s real readable.
[01:21:59.280 --> 01:22:00.280]  Okay.
[01:22:00.280 --> 01:22:01.280]  Okay.
[01:22:01.280 --> 01:22:02.280]  Thank you.
[01:22:02.280 --> 01:22:03.280]  Okay.
[01:22:03.280 --> 01:22:06.280]  Do you have anything else for us, Oliver?
[01:22:06.280 --> 01:22:15.280]  I�ll go look into the � you said look into the indigent, not able to pay requirements.
[01:22:15.280 --> 01:22:18.360]  Yeah, inability to pay.
[01:22:18.360 --> 01:22:23.160]  Inability to pay doesn�t mean you don�t have any money.
[01:22:23.160 --> 01:22:28.880]  You don�t have to be destitute to be unable to pay.
[01:22:28.880 --> 01:22:40.520]  If paying these fees would cause you unreasonable harm, if you can�t pay these fees without
[01:22:40.520 --> 01:22:50.720]  having to forego some other necessity, then you qualify for inability to pay.
[01:22:50.720 --> 01:22:58.760]  And if you have to pay fees that you can�t pay, it has the effect of denying you access
[01:22:58.760 --> 01:23:05.520]  to the courts, and the courts don�t have authority to do that, and these courts are
[01:23:05.520 --> 01:23:12.320]  for everybody and not just for the rich, and that�s why this particular statute exists
[01:23:12.320 --> 01:23:22.240]  in every state so that legal remedy is available to everyone, so look at what they�re charging
[01:23:22.240 --> 01:23:29.080]  and see if you can find specific authorization for those charges.
[01:23:29.080 --> 01:23:38.200]  If you can�t find it, then you charge the clerk with charging you improperly.
[01:23:38.200 --> 01:23:43.480]  You send her a tort letter and notice her that she�s fraudulently charging you improper
[01:23:43.480 --> 01:23:44.480]  fees.
[01:23:44.480 --> 01:23:53.520]  See, you can�t go to the clerk and ask her for the law that allows her to collect these
[01:23:53.520 --> 01:23:59.560]  fees because she�s going to tell you she�s not your lawyer, she don�t have to give
[01:23:59.560 --> 01:24:00.560]  you legal advice.
[01:24:00.560 --> 01:24:03.760]  If you want to see the law, look it up.
[01:24:03.760 --> 01:24:12.280]  So if you can�t find it, then just accuse her of it, and her defense is to show you
[01:24:12.280 --> 01:24:17.200]  the law that she relied on, and then she�ll find the law for you.
[01:24:17.200 --> 01:24:21.520]  If there�s not any law, then she�ll come up with another song and dance that sells
[01:24:21.520 --> 01:24:26.600]  her down your pants argument, in which case she�ll be able to go to the court and ask
[01:24:26.600 --> 01:24:33.720]  the court for a restraining order against the clerk to prevent her from charging you
[01:24:33.720 --> 01:24:34.720]  these fees.
[01:24:34.720 --> 01:24:35.720]  Okay.
[01:24:35.720 --> 01:24:42.560]  I�m pretty familiar with going through the Tennessee law and finding things, so if it�s
[01:24:42.560 --> 01:24:43.560]  in there, I�m going to find it.
[01:24:43.560 --> 01:24:46.560]  If I don�t find it, it�s not in there.
[01:24:46.560 --> 01:24:47.560]  Good.
[01:24:47.560 --> 01:24:48.560]  Good.
[01:24:48.560 --> 01:24:56.160]  Then if you don�t find it, then accuse her of denying you your right, and if it�s somewhere
[01:24:56.160 --> 01:25:00.480]  in some obscure case law, her lawyer will find it.
[01:25:00.480 --> 01:25:06.440]  It�s a big thing going over here in this town that they�re doing there.
[01:25:06.440 --> 01:25:09.120]  It�s a lot of cases like this.
[01:25:09.120 --> 01:25:13.480]  People are not in there to pay, and they�re charging them fees, $50, $100.
[01:25:13.480 --> 01:25:20.400]  Oh, we just got the district clerk in Tarrant County, Texas hammered big time for that.
[01:25:20.400 --> 01:25:25.440]  So I�m looking into it, because I want to do something about it.
[01:25:25.440 --> 01:25:35.120]  Now that would go to a private attorney general type suit, and we�ve talked about that before.
[01:25:35.120 --> 01:25:39.800]  Are you familiar with what a private attorney general suit is?
[01:25:39.800 --> 01:25:40.800]  All right.
[01:25:40.800 --> 01:25:45.360]  I�ll do the research and call you back later so you can talk somebody up, so I can have
[01:25:45.360 --> 01:25:47.360]  something for you to look at.
[01:25:47.360 --> 01:25:48.360]  Okay.
[01:25:48.360 --> 01:25:55.760]  I won�t find much on a private attorney general suit, because that�s merely a name
[01:25:55.760 --> 01:26:02.840]  they give to a certain type of suit, and that�s a suit where you�re suing your behalf and
[01:26:02.840 --> 01:26:05.840]  all others similarly situated.
[01:26:05.840 --> 01:26:06.840]  Statute.
[01:26:06.840 --> 01:26:07.840]  Statute.
[01:26:07.840 --> 01:26:08.840]  Wait.
[01:26:08.840 --> 01:26:09.840]  Say that again.
[01:26:09.840 --> 01:26:13.400]  I�m going to look at the statute for you and find all that information, and then contact
[01:26:13.400 --> 01:26:15.400]  you back and take the next step.
[01:26:15.400 --> 01:26:16.400]  All righty.
[01:26:16.400 --> 01:26:17.400]  Okay.
[01:26:17.400 --> 01:26:18.400]  All right.
[01:26:18.400 --> 01:26:19.400]  Thank you, Oliver.
[01:26:19.400 --> 01:26:20.400]  Okay.
[01:26:20.400 --> 01:26:29.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Reel of Our Radio, and I call it numbers 512-646-1984.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:33.760]  It�s unusual, but we have no callers on the board today.
[01:26:33.760 --> 01:26:36.800]  I guess it just got too hot for everybody.
[01:26:36.800 --> 01:26:43.720]  Well, I�m going to go back to what I was talking about with Mark earlier.
[01:26:43.720 --> 01:26:54.520]  This is a process that I�ve been trying to get developed, a way of thinking about
[01:26:54.520 --> 01:27:03.760]  how to position ourselves with the courts so that we essentially become a court monitor.
[01:27:03.760 --> 01:27:10.480]  There�s these commercials lately about a dentist who�s a dental monitor, and instead
[01:27:10.480 --> 01:27:14.760]  of a dentist, he only monitors the problem.
[01:27:14.760 --> 01:27:24.920]  Well, we can become a court monitor while we are a litigant in a case, because we have
[01:27:24.920 --> 01:27:25.920]  two responsibilities.
[01:27:25.920 --> 01:27:31.720]  When a judge walks into a courtroom, he�s generally wearing two hats.
[01:27:31.720 --> 01:27:37.720]  He�s wearing a judge�s hat, and he�s wearing a magistrate�s hat.
[01:27:37.720 --> 01:27:42.400]  When you walk into the courtroom, you wear two hats.
[01:27:42.400 --> 01:27:48.400]  You wear the litigant�s hat, and you wear the master�s hat.
[01:27:48.400 --> 01:27:58.160]  You are a litigant in the case, and you have empowered certain public employees to perform
[01:27:58.160 --> 01:28:01.680]  certain specific duties.
[01:28:01.680 --> 01:28:03.240]  You have a clerk.
[01:28:03.240 --> 01:28:05.040]  You have a bailiff.
[01:28:05.040 --> 01:28:10.240]  You have a prosecuting attorney, and you�ve empowered all of them and give them authority
[01:28:10.240 --> 01:28:13.760]  to perform certain tasks.
[01:28:13.760 --> 01:28:21.240]  You�ve also empowered the judge to perform a certain task, and if one of your employees
[01:28:21.240 --> 01:28:29.200]  fails to perform the task they�re required to perform, you, as the master of the servant,
[01:28:29.200 --> 01:28:35.000]  you put on your master�s hat and take them on for their indiscretion.
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:39.760]  It�s always been my position that we don�t wait until they do something really horrible.
[01:28:39.760 --> 01:28:46.720]  I know Mark was saying he was looking for something that was serious enough or bad enough
[01:28:46.720 --> 01:28:54.000]  that they would take it serious, and it�s been my experience that what they take even
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:29:01.840]  more serious is when you sting them for the kinds of things they do all the time, like
[01:29:01.840 --> 01:29:06.040]  a judge raising his voice to me in court.
[01:29:06.040 --> 01:29:09.320]  I take that as a threat.
[01:29:09.320 --> 01:29:13.840]  If he has himself an attitude, he needs to take that home.
[01:29:13.840 --> 01:29:19.120]  He�s my employee, and I don�t expect my employees to be yelling at me in court.
[01:29:19.120 --> 01:29:22.880]  I don�t expect my employees to do what they want to in court.
[01:29:22.880 --> 01:29:24.800]  I don�t care if it is the judge.
[01:29:24.800 --> 01:29:27.560]  I expect my employees to follow law.
[01:29:27.560 --> 01:29:31.240]  We do have a caller we had earlier, and he dropped off.
[01:29:31.240 --> 01:29:33.200]  David from South Dakota.
[01:29:33.200 --> 01:29:34.200]  Hello, David.
[01:29:34.200 --> 01:29:35.200]  Hey, Randy.
[01:29:35.200 --> 01:29:36.200]  How are you?
[01:29:36.200 --> 01:29:37.200]  I am doing good.
[01:29:37.200 --> 01:29:42.200]  Well, it�s good to hear your voice across the phone rather than the radio.
[01:29:42.200 --> 01:29:48.400]  I try to catch you every time on the radio, but I don�t know if you can do this on air
[01:29:48.400 --> 01:29:55.400]  or not, but that other panel that you are a guest on on Monday, should I call you or
[01:29:55.400 --> 01:29:57.400]  email you to get that information?
[01:29:57.400 --> 01:30:03.240]  Yes, email me that.
[01:30:03.240 --> 01:30:07.800]  Warning to bloggers, when in India, don�t post opinions on Facebook or they could land
[01:30:07.800 --> 01:30:08.800]  you behind bars.
[01:30:08.800 --> 01:30:14.000]  I�m Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back to tell you how two women got arrested over an innocent
[01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:17.040]  Facebook post in a moment.
[01:30:17.040 --> 01:30:18.760]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.760 --> 01:30:23.160]  When you give up data about yourself, you�ll never get it back again, and once your privacy
[01:30:23.160 --> 01:30:27.360]  is gone, you�ll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:27.360 --> 01:30:32.440]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.440 --> 01:30:35.160]  Privacy, it�s worth hanging onto.
[01:30:35.160 --> 01:30:40.720]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.720 --> 01:30:42.480]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.480 --> 01:30:46.160]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.160 --> 01:30:48.560]  Ever regret something you posted on social media?
[01:30:48.560 --> 01:30:53.400]  In Mumbai, India, a 21-year-old woman questioned on Facebook why the city had to shut down
[01:30:53.400 --> 01:30:58.520]  completely to observe the funeral of Bal Thackeray, a political activist.
[01:30:58.520 --> 01:31:01.040]  That posting earned her a trip to jail.
[01:31:01.040 --> 01:31:02.600]  She wasn�t alone for long.
[01:31:02.600 --> 01:31:06.760]  Police soon arrested her friend, who had the nerve to like the post, then charged both
[01:31:06.760 --> 01:31:08.600]  women with hurting religious sentiments.
[01:31:08.600 --> 01:31:12.080]  They were only released after relatives bailed them out.
[01:31:12.080 --> 01:31:17.200]  Later, a mob ransacked a business belonging to the woman�s uncle, even after she deleted
[01:31:17.200 --> 01:31:20.680]  the comment from her Facebook page and posted an apology.
[01:31:20.680 --> 01:31:23.600]  Oddly, though, nobody was arrested for that.
[01:31:23.600 --> 01:31:29.360]  I�m Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world�s most private search engine.
[01:31:29.360 --> 01:31:36.080]  I lost my son, my uncle, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001.
[01:31:36.080 --> 01:31:39.640]  Most people don�t know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.640 --> 01:31:43.760]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.760 --> 01:31:49.600]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects
[01:31:49.600 --> 01:31:53.320]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[01:31:53.320 --> 01:31:56.480]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:56.480 --> 01:32:01.680]  Go to buildingwatch.org why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:01.680 --> 01:32:04.160]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:32:04.160 --> 01:32:09.760]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it
[01:32:09.760 --> 01:32:10.760]  needs.
[01:32:10.760 --> 01:32:14.480]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:32:14.480 --> 01:32:19.040]  and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:32:19.040 --> 01:32:23.160]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don�t
[01:32:23.160 --> 01:32:24.160]  know what hemp is.
[01:32:24.160 --> 01:32:28.880]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:32:28.880 --> 01:32:31.600]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:32:31.600 --> 01:32:36.360]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand
[01:32:36.360 --> 01:32:40.760]  that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:32:40.760 --> 01:32:47.040]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory,
[01:32:47.040 --> 01:32:49.720]  and non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:32:49.720 --> 01:32:58.640]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you,
[01:32:58.640 --> 01:33:00.640]  only at hempUSA.org.
[01:33:00.640 --> 01:33:07.920]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:07.920 --> 01:33:17.600]  Yeah, and who you want to chip, who you take me for, free totally.
[01:33:17.600 --> 01:33:22.600]  What you want to chip, I'm not free totally, you can't chip me, I'm a say.
[01:33:22.600 --> 01:33:27.600]  Don't let them chip you in the morning, chip you in the evening, put a chip in your body.
[01:33:27.600 --> 01:33:31.600]  And then when you go computer reading, you can't hide me say from nobody.
[01:33:31.600 --> 01:33:37.600]  When me say, chip in your mom, chip in your daddy, chip in your grandpa and the granny,
[01:33:37.600 --> 01:33:42.600]  chip in on me, chip in on your baby, chip in on your family, whole family, chip in on
[01:33:42.600 --> 01:33:47.600]  your dad and the cap around me, chip in on the beef and you still go EP, chip in on the
[01:33:47.600 --> 01:33:52.600]  fish, them all in the sea, chip in on the shark and the whale around me.
[01:33:52.600 --> 01:33:54.600]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:54.600 --> 01:33:59.600]  Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Wheel of Law Radio, we're talking to David in South Dakota.
[01:33:59.600 --> 01:34:02.600]  Okay, David, I ran off the cliff there.
[01:34:02.600 --> 01:34:08.600]  What I was listening to your gentleman there, I apologize for hanging up.
[01:34:08.600 --> 01:34:11.600]  Someone came to the door and I had to put the phone down.
[01:34:11.600 --> 01:34:14.600]  And when it came back, I lost my connection.
[01:34:14.600 --> 01:34:24.600]  But how about giving the equivalent of a judicial notice to the judge, outlining what he's by
[01:34:24.600 --> 01:34:29.600]  law allowed to do before you enter his courtroom?
[01:34:29.600 --> 01:34:37.600]  No, that's one of the things that I've worked with and dealt with a lot.
[01:34:37.600 --> 01:34:40.600]  And it's turned out to be a bad idea.
[01:34:40.600 --> 01:34:42.600]  It is a bad idea.
[01:34:42.600 --> 01:34:45.600]  Now I go for bushwhack.
[01:34:45.600 --> 01:34:48.600]  Yeah, I understand there's two approaches.
[01:34:48.600 --> 01:34:55.600]  But several years ago, maybe six or seven in Austin, I had a lady judge and I sent her a
[01:34:55.600 --> 01:35:03.600]  judicial notice basically outlining what I expected her to do in that court that day.
[01:35:03.600 --> 01:35:13.600]  And before she opened her court, she called me up front and refused to hear my case
[01:35:13.600 --> 01:35:18.600]  and sent me to the next higher judge.
[01:35:18.600 --> 01:35:22.600]  She didn't want anybody telling her the rules.
[01:35:22.600 --> 01:35:24.600]  Poor baby.
[01:35:24.600 --> 01:35:28.600]  Well, I suppose that would work just fine.
[01:35:28.600 --> 01:35:38.600]  Generally, when I try to tell the court what the law is, they get real excited, real huffy,
[01:35:38.600 --> 01:35:41.600]  puffy and defensive.
[01:35:41.600 --> 01:35:46.600]  And they like to accuse me of being agitated.
[01:35:46.600 --> 01:35:49.600]  So I quit doing that kind of stuff.
[01:35:49.600 --> 01:35:54.600]  I found that bushwhack works a whole lot better.
[01:35:54.600 --> 01:36:03.600]  I make it a point to never ask a public official to do anything that I actually want them to do
[01:36:03.600 --> 01:36:10.600]  because I never asked a public official to do anything that the law does not specifically
[01:36:10.600 --> 01:36:12.600]  require him to do.
[01:36:12.600 --> 01:36:15.600]  I've never asked these guys for favors.
[01:36:15.600 --> 01:36:18.600]  I never expect a favor.
[01:36:18.600 --> 01:36:21.600]  I don't want a favor.
[01:36:21.600 --> 01:36:25.600]  We just want them to go down the middle of the road with the law.
[01:36:25.600 --> 01:36:27.600]  Exactly.
[01:36:27.600 --> 01:36:31.600]  And so I ask them to do these things and the law requires them to.
[01:36:31.600 --> 01:36:35.600]  And when they don't, I don't give them legal advice.
[01:36:35.600 --> 01:36:38.600]  I don't say these are my rights.
[01:36:38.600 --> 01:36:40.600]  This is what you're supposed to do.
[01:36:40.600 --> 01:36:42.600]  You're not supposed to do that.
[01:36:42.600 --> 01:36:44.600]  I don't do any of that stuff.
[01:36:44.600 --> 01:36:50.600]  Depending on what it is, I will either, when I leave the courtroom, file criminal charges with them there
[01:36:50.600 --> 01:36:55.600]  or in the court, I'll ask the bailiff to arrest the judge.
[01:36:55.600 --> 01:36:57.600]  Uh-huh.
[01:36:57.600 --> 01:36:59.600]  That works.
[01:36:59.600 --> 01:37:02.600]  That changes the whole perspective.
[01:37:02.600 --> 01:37:10.600]  Every time I've asked a bailiff to arrest a judge, the judge has sat there and kept his mouth shut.
[01:37:10.600 --> 01:37:20.600]  And that's an indication that the judge fully understands his position in the overall scheme of things.
[01:37:20.600 --> 01:37:27.600]  You have the bailiff there and his job is to keep the peace in the courtroom, makes no difference who breaches it.
[01:37:27.600 --> 01:37:32.600]  The bailiff doesn't necessarily know that, but the judge does.
[01:37:32.600 --> 01:37:39.600]  So when I accuse the judge of a crime from the bench and ask the bailiff to arrest him,
[01:37:39.600 --> 01:37:44.600]  the judge knows full well he better keep his mouth shut.
[01:37:44.600 --> 01:37:52.600]  One word out of him, and that's obstruction and tampering, both of which are felonies, tampering the witness.
[01:37:52.600 --> 01:37:55.600]  So he's not going to say anything until I'm done with the bailiff.
[01:37:55.600 --> 01:38:02.600]  And when I'm done with the bailiff, I got myself a whole different attitude from that judge.
[01:38:02.600 --> 01:38:07.600]  Now I've got his attention because he knows I set him up.
[01:38:07.600 --> 01:38:16.600]  And that has been the most powerful part of what I've been doing.
[01:38:16.600 --> 01:38:20.600]  I really hadn't expected that. This is not something I planned on.
[01:38:20.600 --> 01:38:26.600]  This is just something that grew out of these interactions.
[01:38:26.600 --> 01:38:32.600]  A policeman pulled me over. I get two words I don't like out of him.
[01:38:32.600 --> 01:38:41.600]  I get the 911 call. The 911 call changes everything.
[01:38:41.600 --> 01:38:48.600]  In the state of Texas, it is a felony to interfere with a 911 call.
[01:38:48.600 --> 01:38:49.600]  Is that right?
[01:38:49.600 --> 01:38:52.600]  That is a fact.
[01:38:52.600 --> 01:38:53.600]  Wow.
[01:38:53.600 --> 01:38:57.600]  So you open a legal door there.
[01:38:57.600 --> 01:39:07.600]  And then when you do the 911 call, then I always ask the operator to send someone out to take my criminal accusation against this public official.
[01:39:07.600 --> 01:39:11.600]  So that makes it a valid and proper 911 call.
[01:39:11.600 --> 01:39:18.600]  I have never been accused of making a false 911 call.
[01:39:18.600 --> 01:39:22.600]  Nobody's ever even alluded to it.
[01:39:22.600 --> 01:39:32.600]  And when I make the call, you're going to get an operator and the operator, the dispatcher, is going to try to talk you out of it.
[01:39:32.600 --> 01:39:38.600]  Well, what did they do? I asked, are you a prosecuting attorney?
[01:39:38.600 --> 01:39:41.600]  He's going to say no.
[01:39:41.600 --> 01:39:46.600]  None of your business. He committed this crime. I'm prepared to file this criminal complaint.
[01:39:46.600 --> 01:39:54.600]  If you're always asked, are you a lawyer? They always say, no, I'm a dispatcher. Well, then dispatch.
[01:39:54.600 --> 01:39:59.600]  If I need a lawyer, I'll call the prosecutor.
[01:39:59.600 --> 01:40:06.600]  That generally stops them. And they always dispatch. They never not dispatch.
[01:40:06.600 --> 01:40:09.600]  Because this is a 911 call.
[01:40:09.600 --> 01:40:13.600]  What if this policeman beats me up?
[01:40:13.600 --> 01:40:20.600]  And then I go to court and say I dial 911 and they refuse to dispatch.
[01:40:20.600 --> 01:40:23.600]  So it really puts them on the dive. They don't.
[01:40:23.600 --> 01:40:27.600]  They don't expect you to take this kind of approach.
[01:40:27.600 --> 01:40:35.600]  And then when the other officer shows up, now he is in a quandary.
[01:40:35.600 --> 01:40:42.600]  I can see it in their eyes. What do I do now? He wants me to arrest my buddy over here.
[01:40:42.600 --> 01:40:45.600]  I don't want to arrest my buddy over here.
[01:40:45.600 --> 01:40:50.600]  Because if I arrest my buddy, he's going to really be peotic me.
[01:40:50.600 --> 01:41:02.600]  But if I don't arrest my buddy, this guy's going to be filing criminal charges against me.
[01:41:02.600 --> 01:41:09.600]  Once you call 911, all that huffy puffy.
[01:41:09.600 --> 01:41:13.600]  I'm the boss. You're the chop. All that stuff goes out the window.
[01:41:13.600 --> 01:41:20.600]  All of a sudden they get another attitude and they don't want to be pushing you around anymore.
[01:41:20.600 --> 01:41:24.600]  They want to get away from you as quickly and easily as they possibly can.
[01:41:24.600 --> 01:41:33.600]  I do not suggest that anyone get in an argument with a policeman on the side of the road.
[01:41:33.600 --> 01:41:39.600]  Don't give him legal advice. Don't tell him what he's supposed to do.
[01:41:39.600 --> 01:41:46.600]  Let him screw up whatever he wants to because when you get him in court, you're going to work him over.
[01:41:46.600 --> 01:41:50.600]  The last one that gave me a ticket was in Decatur, Texas.
[01:41:50.600 --> 01:41:53.600]  And he handed me the ticket and I signed it and I said,
[01:41:53.600 --> 01:42:04.600]  Bubba, I'm fixing to give you a romp through the legal system. You are not going to believe.
[01:42:04.600 --> 01:42:10.600]  Oh, you are, Mr. Kelton. I'm smiling. Oh, yeah. You're going to love this.
[01:42:10.600 --> 01:42:14.600]  He didn't know who Randy Kelton was, did he?
[01:42:14.600 --> 01:42:24.600]  Well, his problem was I didn't react the way he expected me to.
[01:42:24.600 --> 01:42:27.600]  And that always puts them off.
[01:42:27.600 --> 01:42:34.600]  They always expect people to get frustrated and defensive because they're not used to getting tickets.
[01:42:34.600 --> 01:42:39.600]  And people don't respond well because we don't have much practice.
[01:42:39.600 --> 01:42:44.600]  Well, fortunately, unfortunately, I got a bit of practice,
[01:42:44.600 --> 01:42:47.600]  but then I have practice with other people's tickets, too.
[01:42:47.600 --> 01:42:49.600]  So that makes it a little bit easier.
[01:42:49.600 --> 01:42:54.600]  But if you're thinking in terms of Bushwhack,
[01:42:54.600 --> 01:43:00.600]  then you're thinking in terms of setting up the officer, giving him opportunity to screw up.
[01:43:00.600 --> 01:43:05.600]  You tend not to feel so frustrated and angry and be betrayed by the officer.
[01:43:05.600 --> 01:43:11.600]  We treat the officer like someone who needs a little instruction.
[01:43:11.600 --> 01:43:14.600]  And I'm the right guy to give it to you.
[01:43:14.600 --> 01:43:16.600]  But not out here on the road.
[01:43:16.600 --> 01:43:20.600]  I give it to you in court in front of a judge and prosecutor
[01:43:20.600 --> 01:43:29.600]  and let you struggle to make yourself look like a professional police officer while I'm working you over.
[01:43:29.600 --> 01:43:35.600]  Everyone can get the benefit of what you're teaching them, too.
[01:43:35.600 --> 01:43:37.600]  It gives them a teaching.
[01:43:37.600 --> 01:43:40.600]  I don't have anything against the police.
[01:43:40.600 --> 01:43:44.600]  Sometimes we need to remind them of who they are.
[01:43:44.600 --> 01:43:45.600]  Hang on.
[01:43:45.600 --> 01:43:48.600]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Wheelbarrow Radio.
[01:43:48.600 --> 01:43:52.600]  I call it number 512-646-1984.
[01:43:52.600 --> 01:44:00.600]  We're talking to David in South Dakota, and we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.600 --> 01:44:05.600]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:05.600 --> 01:44:09.600]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:44:09.600 --> 01:44:14.600]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too.
[01:44:14.600 --> 01:44:20.600]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:44:20.600 --> 01:44:26.600]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:44:26.600 --> 01:44:28.600]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[01:44:28.600 --> 01:44:33.600]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.600 --> 01:44:38.600]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.600 --> 01:44:40.600]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:40.600 --> 01:44:46.600]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:44:46.600 --> 01:44:49.600]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.600 --> 01:45:00.600]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:00.600 --> 01:45:03.600]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.600 --> 01:45:07.600]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.600 --> 01:45:15.600]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.600 --> 01:45:18.600]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.600 --> 01:45:22.600]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.600 --> 01:45:27.600]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.600 --> 01:45:33.600]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.600 --> 01:45:38.600]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.600 --> 01:45:42.600]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.600 --> 01:45:48.600]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:48.600 --> 01:45:51.600]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.600 --> 01:46:00.600]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:00.600 --> 01:46:29.600]  Thank you.
[01:46:29.600 --> 01:46:30.600]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:30.600 --> 01:46:37.600]  Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to David in South Dakota.
[01:46:37.600 --> 01:46:43.600]  And David, did you have a specific issue or question that you wanted to bring?
[01:46:43.600 --> 01:46:48.600]  The question I was listening to the gentleman, two or three people back,
[01:46:48.600 --> 01:46:52.600]  was about notice to the judge and how to...
[01:46:52.600 --> 01:46:57.600]  And I know what you normally tell them whenever it gets to that point,
[01:46:57.600 --> 01:47:04.600]  but I wanted to see if a judicial notice would...
[01:47:04.600 --> 01:47:07.600]  or something similar to that would serve the same purpose.
[01:47:07.600 --> 01:47:11.600]  But I understand the bushwhack approach, too.
[01:47:11.600 --> 01:47:18.600]  Well, the thing about judicial notice, all of that the judge already knows or should know.
[01:47:18.600 --> 01:47:21.600]  He doesn't know that you know it. He doesn't know that you know it.
[01:47:21.600 --> 01:47:28.600]  Yeah, but he does. From my perspective, it's better if he doesn't know that I know it.
[01:47:28.600 --> 01:47:30.600]  Right.
[01:47:30.600 --> 01:47:34.600]  But he's responsible for it, whether I bring it up or not.
[01:47:34.600 --> 01:47:38.600]  And this is one of the things that I see in some of the case law.
[01:47:38.600 --> 01:47:47.600]  They try to say that your right is not your right unless you wave your right in front of the court, like speedy trial.
[01:47:47.600 --> 01:47:53.600]  They're saying that if you don't demand speedy trial, then you wave speedy trial.
[01:47:53.600 --> 01:47:58.600]  Well, I don't see that in the law in the statute anymore.
[01:47:58.600 --> 01:48:01.600]  The courts just kind of made that up.
[01:48:01.600 --> 01:48:11.600]  And there are other rights they claim that if you don't claim them, then you wave them.
[01:48:11.600 --> 01:48:13.600]  And I'm real uncomfortable with that.
[01:48:13.600 --> 01:48:24.600]  It is my position that if the law tells you that you as a public official must do a certain thing,
[01:48:24.600 --> 01:48:32.600]  rather or not I waved my right is irrelevant to your duty.
[01:48:32.600 --> 01:48:39.600]  If it is your duty to conduct a speedy trial and you fail to do so.
[01:48:39.600 --> 01:48:43.600]  OK, maybe I don't have a problem with that.
[01:48:43.600 --> 01:48:45.600]  Let me give you an example.
[01:48:45.600 --> 01:48:52.600]  Judge McBride, federal judge in Fort Worth, dismissed my case with prejudice
[01:48:52.600 --> 01:48:58.600]  when there was a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction in the court.
[01:48:58.600 --> 01:49:05.600]  Now, he could dismiss it, but he could not dismiss it with prejudice.
[01:49:05.600 --> 01:49:11.600]  Once there's a subject matter jurisdiction challenge, he can dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
[01:49:11.600 --> 01:49:17.600]  But he cannot dismiss with prejudice because that goes to the merits.
[01:49:17.600 --> 01:49:20.600]  And he can't get there until he's overcome jurisdiction.
[01:49:20.600 --> 01:49:25.600]  Well, he did that the same day I non-suited.
[01:49:25.600 --> 01:49:36.600]  So I didn't really care except that my law says he can't do that.
[01:49:36.600 --> 01:49:46.600]  The law says that he doesn't have that authority and he exerted or purported to exert an authority he did not expressly have.
[01:49:46.600 --> 01:49:48.600]  He had no jurisdiction.
[01:49:48.600 --> 01:49:49.600]  Right.
[01:49:49.600 --> 01:49:52.600]  So I don't care if it hurt me or not.
[01:49:52.600 --> 01:49:58.600]  Denied me in due process and due process is a harm per se.
[01:49:58.600 --> 01:50:01.600]  And it's criminal.
[01:50:01.600 --> 01:50:03.600]  Most important to me, it's criminal.
[01:50:03.600 --> 01:50:08.600]  He exerted authority, exerted authority, didn't expressly have and denied me the right.
[01:50:08.600 --> 01:50:13.600]  That's a crime, 218 U.S. Code 242.
[01:50:13.600 --> 01:50:17.600]  And it is my duty to give notice of that crime.
[01:50:17.600 --> 01:50:24.600]  Now, I don't have to want Judge McBride prosecuted.
[01:50:24.600 --> 01:50:27.600]  Not my concern.
[01:50:27.600 --> 01:50:32.600]  It is my duty to give notice of crime.
[01:50:32.600 --> 01:50:33.600]  That's a felony.
[01:50:33.600 --> 01:50:34.600]  So I had a duty.
[01:50:34.600 --> 01:50:35.600]  And I'm sorry, that was a misdemeanor.
[01:50:35.600 --> 01:50:38.600]  So I didn't actually have a duty.
[01:50:38.600 --> 01:50:42.600]  But I had a moral duty to give notice of crime.
[01:50:42.600 --> 01:50:43.600]  Right.
[01:50:43.600 --> 01:50:45.600]  And I did that.
[01:50:45.600 --> 01:50:53.600]  Now, the clerk, I filed it with the clerk because they wouldn't let me appear before a magistrate.
[01:50:53.600 --> 01:50:56.600]  So I appeared through the clerk.
[01:50:56.600 --> 01:51:00.600]  A week later, the clerk sent it back to me.
[01:51:00.600 --> 01:51:03.600]  So what would you do, David?
[01:51:03.600 --> 01:51:10.600]  You go to the federal court and say, I want to see a magistrate in the form of a district federal judge.
[01:51:10.600 --> 01:51:11.600]  Now, oh, you can't see the judges.
[01:51:11.600 --> 01:51:13.600]  You'll have to see the clerk.
[01:51:13.600 --> 01:51:17.600]  Okay, so I go to the clerk and I have this criminal complaint.
[01:51:17.600 --> 01:51:19.600]  I need to give it to some magistrate.
[01:51:19.600 --> 01:51:21.600]  Well, you'll have to file it here.
[01:51:21.600 --> 01:51:26.600]  Well, I wrote on it, filed for the purpose or presentation to some magistrate.
[01:51:26.600 --> 01:51:29.600]  The clerk takes it and then the clerk sends it back to you.
[01:51:29.600 --> 01:51:32.600]  What would you do, David?
[01:51:32.600 --> 01:51:36.600]  I would file a criminal complaint against that clerk.
[01:51:36.600 --> 01:51:40.600]  Exactly.
[01:51:40.600 --> 01:51:49.600]  So now the clerk went to the judges and said, oh, judge, what should I do with this?
[01:51:49.600 --> 01:51:52.600]  And the judge told him, now I'm going to file against him.
[01:51:52.600 --> 01:51:56.600]  So what's he going to do now?
[01:51:56.600 --> 01:52:00.600]  But what charge would the clerk, would I file against the clerk?
[01:52:00.600 --> 01:52:03.600]  That's my, I don't know that much of the law.
[01:52:03.600 --> 01:52:12.600]  3805 Texas penal code shielding from prosecution, 3710 tampering with the government document.
[01:52:12.600 --> 01:52:13.600]  Tampering, okay.
[01:52:13.600 --> 01:52:16.600]  Two, two, two felonies.
[01:52:16.600 --> 01:52:21.600]  Tampering for the purpose of shielding.
[01:52:21.600 --> 01:52:26.600]  So the clerk has a defense.
[01:52:26.600 --> 01:52:30.600]  Good faith reliance on competent authority.
[01:52:30.600 --> 01:52:34.600]  Yeah, the clerk was relying on competent authority.
[01:52:34.600 --> 01:52:46.600]  I definitely want to know who that competent authority is because whoever gave him that advice was a lawyer and not a judge.
[01:52:46.600 --> 01:52:47.600]  Right.
[01:52:47.600 --> 01:52:51.600]  Zero immunity.
[01:52:51.600 --> 01:52:53.600]  So you got him again.
[01:52:53.600 --> 01:53:06.600]  I once went to my county attorney because my chief of police in the town I live in refused to act on a criminal complaint I gave him.
[01:53:06.600 --> 01:53:10.600]  And he said that the county attorney told him not to present it to some magistrate.
[01:53:10.600 --> 01:53:16.600]  So I shimmy on down to the county attorney's office and he met me outside.
[01:53:16.600 --> 01:53:17.600]  He knew I was coming.
[01:53:17.600 --> 01:53:28.600]  He said, Mr. Kelton, do you think I have lost my professional mind by giving legal advice to the police?
[01:53:28.600 --> 01:53:29.600]  I'm sorry.
[01:53:29.600 --> 01:53:38.600]  Do you think I've lost my professional mind and would waive my sovereign immunity by giving legal advice to the police?
[01:53:38.600 --> 01:53:44.600]  And I said, well, James, I didn't think so, but I'm just following the thunder here.
[01:53:44.600 --> 01:53:52.600]  See, for him, that was a big deal because he knew I'd be suing him in a minute.
[01:53:52.600 --> 01:54:01.600]  So I went back to the chief of police, went back to the police department, knocked on the door and this deputy come to the door.
[01:54:01.600 --> 01:54:04.600]  He said, what could I do for you, Mr. Kelton?
[01:54:04.600 --> 01:54:15.600]  And you need to tell the chief that James Staten threw him under the bus and I'm here to run him over with it.
[01:54:15.600 --> 01:54:18.600]  That was so much fun.
[01:54:18.600 --> 01:54:20.600]  Point is.
[01:54:20.600 --> 01:54:27.600]  When I think of Randy Kelton, I always think of that walk softly and carry a big stick.
[01:54:27.600 --> 01:54:30.600]  That's in my mind, that's who Randy Kelton is.
[01:54:30.600 --> 01:54:32.600]  And that big stick is the law.
[01:54:32.600 --> 01:54:34.600]  The law, yeah.
[01:54:34.600 --> 01:54:36.600]  I don't ask him for much.
[01:54:36.600 --> 01:54:37.600]  Yes.
[01:54:37.600 --> 01:54:38.600]  Here it is.
[01:54:38.600 --> 01:54:40.600]  Now, don't blame me.
[01:54:40.600 --> 01:54:41.600]  I didn't write it.
[01:54:41.600 --> 01:54:44.600]  I just read it and followed it.
[01:54:44.600 --> 01:54:46.600]  And this is powerful.
[01:54:46.600 --> 01:54:48.600]  This part really works.
[01:54:48.600 --> 01:55:12.600]  And in doing this radio, I'm trying to find a way to frame my language in a way that people will tend to get a different perspective and get it in a way that will make it something that they could be comfortable doing.
[01:55:12.600 --> 01:55:21.600]  And one of the things that people be more comfortable doing is bushwhack rather than try to argue legal matters with a police officer.
[01:55:21.600 --> 01:55:32.600]  Or if I'm in front of a judge and he does something illegal, rather than try to argue legal matters with this judge, I get to go away, do my homework.
[01:55:32.600 --> 01:55:43.600]  And then I go invoke the duty of another judge and demand that he take this legal action against a buddy of his.
[01:55:43.600 --> 01:55:49.600]  Now I got this second judge doing this chicken dance, trying to...
[01:55:49.600 --> 01:55:55.600]  The politics pot starts boiling.
[01:55:55.600 --> 01:56:04.600]  Exactly, because first thing this judge is going to do is go to that other judge and say, what have you got me into?
[01:56:04.600 --> 01:56:10.600]  If we could get two or three people in every county doing this, I'm telling you, this works.
[01:56:10.600 --> 01:56:14.600]  I don't have the police coming after me.
[01:56:14.600 --> 01:56:19.600]  I don't have the police angry at me.
[01:56:19.600 --> 01:56:24.600]  I get a lot of respect from the police and the courts.
[01:56:24.600 --> 01:56:30.600]  Now they're afraid of me and they would rather not deal with me.
[01:56:30.600 --> 01:56:39.600]  The judge, remember me telling the story about the hearing aid and how I got drunk in Mexico and lost it.
[01:56:39.600 --> 01:56:41.600]  Have you heard that story?
[01:56:41.600 --> 01:56:43.600]  Yeah, I remember. Go ahead.
[01:56:43.600 --> 01:56:56.600]  Okay, I just went back to that same judge's court and this judge could not have been more pleasant and professional.
[01:56:56.600 --> 01:57:08.600]  You could tell he was traipsing around on eggshells, never spoke to me, never looked directly at me.
[01:57:08.600 --> 01:57:11.600]  And I get that a lot.
[01:57:11.600 --> 01:57:15.600]  If they're worried about you, if they're intimidated, they will never look at you.
[01:57:15.600 --> 01:57:20.600]  You can tell he's struggling not to look at me.
[01:57:20.600 --> 01:57:30.600]  And what I always do, because I know they're doing that, is I take out a pad and paper and I act like I'm taking copious notes.
[01:57:30.600 --> 01:57:38.600]  And sometimes when they're talking, I'll lean way forward, like I'm trying to hear and then I'll start scribbling notes.
[01:57:38.600 --> 01:57:42.600]  It makes them crazy.
[01:57:42.600 --> 01:57:49.600]  It's too bad we can't have a court watcher in every court doing the same thing.
[01:57:49.600 --> 01:58:01.600]  Exactly. This is what I'm working on, trying to find a way to do this to where it's not threatening to the person doing it.
[01:58:01.600 --> 01:58:09.600]  And by using bushwhack, then you're not doing anything here in front of them.
[01:58:09.600 --> 01:58:12.600]  You don't engage them in argument.
[01:58:12.600 --> 01:58:19.600]  You set them up and go away and come back and beat them up from a distance and it makes them nuts.
[01:58:19.600 --> 01:58:25.600]  And it keeps you from winding up in an untenable position.
[01:58:25.600 --> 01:58:30.600]  Okay, we are about out of time and thank you for calling in, David.
[01:58:30.600 --> 01:58:33.600]  This is the subject I do like to talk about.
[01:58:33.600 --> 01:58:35.600]  This is Randy Calvin Denver Stevens.
[01:58:35.600 --> 01:58:36.600]  Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:36.600 --> 01:58:40.600]  We'll be back tomorrow night with our four-hour info marathon.
[01:58:40.600 --> 01:58:50.600]  Thank you all and good night.
[01:58:50.600 --> 01:58:58.600]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.600 --> 01:59:04.600]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.600 --> 01:59:08.600]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.600 --> 01:59:11.600]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.600 --> 01:59:20.600]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.600 --> 01:59:29.600]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.600 --> 01:59:32.600]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.600 --> 01:59:40.600]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.600 --> 01:59:51.600]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.600 --> 02:00:11.600]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.