[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000] The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli [00:06.000 --> 00:08.000] bulletins for the commodities market. [00:08.000 --> 00:21.000] Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives. [00:21.000 --> 00:28.000] Markets for Friday, April 15, 2016 are currently treading with gold at $1,233.72 an ounce, [00:28.000 --> 00:35.000] silver at $16.21 an ounce, Texas crude at $40.36 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently [00:35.000 --> 00:44.000] sitting at about $430 U.S. currency. [00:44.000 --> 00:51.000] Today in history, the year 1865, Abraham Lincoln is shot at Ford's Theater in Washington, D.C. [00:51.000 --> 00:57.000] Honest Abe died today in history. [00:57.000 --> 01:02.000] In recent news, 22 Texas Republican district or county conventions passed resolutions calling [01:02.000 --> 01:05.000] for a vote on state secession in March. [01:05.000 --> 01:09.000] Though only 10 responded and actually validated the passage of such resolutions, an official [01:09.000 --> 01:13.000] count should be available from the Republican Party of Texas in early May. [01:13.000 --> 01:17.000] Last year, the Texas Nationalist Movement made headlines with a statewide tour of speaking [01:17.000 --> 01:21.000] events seeking enough signatures to get secession on the GOP primary ballot. [01:21.000 --> 01:25.000] Daniel Miller, the group's president, said that they came close, but not close enough. [01:25.000 --> 01:30.000] However, as a result, recruited and trained a lot of volunteers from Amarillo to San Antonio. [01:30.000 --> 01:34.000] Supporters of an independent Texas promote such efforts because of federal overreach, [01:34.000 --> 01:38.000] corruption, and excessive spending, not to mention the reality of Texas being large and [01:38.000 --> 01:41.000] economically independent enough to actually go it alone. [01:41.000 --> 01:45.000] And though the Supreme Court ruled in 1869 that states do not have the right to secede, [01:45.000 --> 01:49.000] secessionists are pointing out that these rulings will have no binding once the state [01:49.000 --> 01:50.000] declares independence. [01:50.000 --> 01:54.000] Federalists are warning that the federal government will be obligated to use force against such [01:54.000 --> 01:58.000] a move, since it would be considered rebellion under federal regulation. [02:02.000 --> 02:06.000] 150 federal to state law enforcement from various agencies assisted the Seguin police [02:06.000 --> 02:10.000] department with dozens of arrest warrants targeting Mexican mafia operations trafficking [02:10.000 --> 02:12.000] heroin and cocaine into Seguin and Ubranfals. [02:12.000 --> 02:16.000] This mass-coordinated effort, 18 months in the planning, was set in motion when indictments [02:16.000 --> 02:20.000] unsealed Friday charged defendants with a conspiracy to possess and intent to distribute [02:20.000 --> 02:21.000] controlled substances. [02:21.000 --> 02:25.000] Authorities suspect those rounded up are responsible for distributing heroin, cocaine, [02:25.000 --> 02:28.000] and methamphetamine into Seguin and Ubranfals since 2010. [02:28.000 --> 02:32.000] The alleged leader of the mafia, a lieutenant, is among the people arrested. [02:32.000 --> 02:35.000] Police say that these networks supply drugs from Austin to Houston and are believed to [02:35.000 --> 02:37.000] even have ties within the Texas prison system. [02:37.000 --> 02:41.000] It does seem police have found themselves a cozy permanent job waging the drug war. [02:41.000 --> 02:45.000] Unfortunately, these indefinite efforts will continue to remain so because of the [02:45.000 --> 02:49.000] criminalization of drugs themselves, consequently bringing in cartels, violence, [02:49.000 --> 02:52.000] smuggling, and millions of tax dollars gone to waste. [02:52.000 --> 03:20.000] This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for April 15, 2016. [03:20.000 --> 03:23.000] This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for April 15, 2016. [03:50.000 --> 03:52.000] This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for April 15, 2016. [04:20.000 --> 04:43.000] All right, folks, it is June 27th, 2016. [04:43.000 --> 04:47.600] This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig, and I am [04:47.600 --> 04:54.200] trying to run all this here by myself tonight. My call screener is not here tonight. And [04:54.200 --> 05:02.440] I've been doing some research on a particular term, and that term is scumbag. Now the reason [05:02.440 --> 05:08.720] I bring this up at the beginning of the show is because the main reason that shows like [05:08.720 --> 05:20.320] rule of law exists is because we have to assist people in learning how to deal with society's [05:20.320 --> 05:26.800] scumbags. And I'm not talking about the ones defined by society as the criminal element [05:26.800 --> 05:33.680] in the majority of cases that we have, because those people aren't really criminals, except [05:33.680 --> 05:41.240] in the eyes of the system. Many of them have never harmed anyone, and yet they're having [05:41.240 --> 05:49.440] their money and life and properties stolen by the state. And it's always through the [05:49.440 --> 05:57.320] same mechanism, the courts. And it's always under the control of the same group of people, [05:57.320 --> 06:03.720] the attorneys. The attorneys control the courts as the defense. They control the courts as [06:03.720 --> 06:12.400] the prosecution. They control the courts as the judges. They control the courts as the [06:12.400 --> 06:23.400] people responsible for training, every one of those. They control the system by rewriting [06:23.400 --> 06:31.160] law to suit their own agenda or their own perspective, regardless of what the law says [06:31.160 --> 06:37.960] or where it conflicts with the very power that created them, the Constitution itself, [06:37.960 --> 06:45.400] state or federal. And I want to tell you what the actual definition of this term scumbag [06:45.400 --> 06:56.880] is, a contemptible or objectionable person. Okay? I can't think of a more apt description [06:56.880 --> 07:04.600] of most attorneys. And not because they're always bad people when you encounter them. [07:04.600 --> 07:12.240] They're very charming, witty, and entertaining attorneys. Don't get me wrong. Until it comes [07:12.240 --> 07:21.920] to who gets to have that almighty dollar. When it comes right down to it, the attorney [07:21.920 --> 07:29.080] is going to sacrifice you for his own benefit every time. And the few that haven't, haven't [07:29.080 --> 07:35.120] been able to remain attorneys. And the only question then is how long did it take them [07:35.120 --> 07:39.880] to be a scumbag before they realized they were a scumbag and quit or get out or fight [07:39.880 --> 07:49.080] back? Whatever their initial response to a corrupt system such as that that exists here [07:49.080 --> 08:04.040] actually was. We have allowed too many other people to tell us what everything means, what [08:04.040 --> 08:10.120] everything is worth, what we have a right to and what we don't have a right to. [08:10.120 --> 08:17.360] Now, I've talked about a book before that I read many years ago and I reread it occasionally. [08:17.360 --> 08:25.300] And it's not the world's greatest written novel. It is not with such a great plot line [08:25.300 --> 08:35.560] that it's an irresistible book. What makes this book appealing to me is the subject. [08:35.560 --> 08:45.200] And the subject is freedom under constitutional observation and obedience. And remember constitutional [08:45.200 --> 08:50.980] obedience isn't binding upon the people. We're not obedient to the constitution because [08:50.980 --> 08:58.880] it doesn't do anything to bind us to anything. But the government and everyone in it, that's [08:58.880 --> 09:07.800] a whole other story. The name of this book is Hope. And it was put out by a group called [09:07.800 --> 09:12.480] the Jews for the Preservation of Fire, for firearms or something to that effect. I don't [09:12.480 --> 09:18.080] remember the exact name of the group, but basically it was started. It's a bunch of [09:18.080 --> 09:24.280] Jewish folks that were never going to let a repeat of the disarming of the Jews and [09:24.280 --> 09:27.440] their destruction by Germany to ever occur again. [09:27.440 --> 09:32.240] They would rather fight back than remain docile. And they started an organization and they [09:32.240 --> 09:40.320] actually published several books. There's this book and several others. But this book [09:40.320 --> 09:49.120] begins with the premise that you have a self-made billionaire who has worked hard all of his [09:49.120 --> 09:54.440] life to build up a company from scratch with the woman that he married when he was younger. [09:54.440 --> 09:59.920] And she was basically the one that went out seeking all the new technologies as they were [09:59.920 --> 10:05.380] developed and found a way to market them. And he ran the company and made the deals [10:05.380 --> 10:10.920] and made his business successful. And he did it despite all of the government interference [10:10.920 --> 10:18.120] regulation and corruption that always is used to drain money from these corporations into [10:18.120 --> 10:21.240] the pockets of the politicians. [10:21.240 --> 10:33.760] Now this same business owner also had a background in his degree was in American history. And [10:33.760 --> 10:38.240] his favorite subject when he was studying that was the War of Independence with Great [10:38.240 --> 10:45.320] Britain and what it was all about. And as he became older, he maintained that air of [10:45.320 --> 10:49.880] freedom and respectability and everything as a constitutional republic, even while he [10:49.880 --> 10:55.400] was trying to build this big corporation. But he played the game to make the business [10:55.400 --> 10:56.400] successful. [10:56.400 --> 11:03.240] Well, finally, he decides that he's going to create an endowment at a university. And [11:03.240 --> 11:08.960] he sets the requirements of the and this is after his wife has passed away. He decided [11:08.960 --> 11:18.440] he's going to set the qualifications for the professor who is to teach under this endowment [11:18.440 --> 11:26.880] to basically fit only one person on the planet himself, his background, his personal net [11:26.880 --> 11:35.040] worth and his belief system as far as the constitutional republic and all that goes. [11:35.040 --> 11:38.000] And when he set up the qualifications with the university he was going to teach at, he [11:38.000 --> 11:42.640] made all that very clear that this is what the qualifications are. And then he went and [11:42.640 --> 11:46.500] applied for the job that he had created. [11:46.500 --> 11:51.440] And so he got it, of course. And through the course of this, he's teaching a bunch of young [11:51.440 --> 11:56.560] students about the Constitution and what it was like to live under British rule in those [11:56.560 --> 12:02.440] times. And some of the imagery he uses in this classroom is very straightforward. [12:02.440 --> 12:07.360] And for those people out there that are veterans of the Vietnam War, the Korean War that are [12:07.360 --> 12:12.700] still listening to things like this, you can relate to this in some ways because you would [12:12.700 --> 12:18.120] have seen some of this potentially while you were serving in areas like that. [12:18.120 --> 12:26.720] But he was talking about when the British soldiers were sent to America, they thought [12:26.720 --> 12:33.740] themselves superior to all of the colonists. As a British soldier, they were untouchable. [12:33.740 --> 12:39.080] You couldn't defend yourself against them. You couldn't do anything to disobey them. [12:39.080 --> 12:45.960] And if you did, they had the king's discretion to kill you on the spot. Okay? [12:45.960 --> 12:54.880] And in case you aren't making the equivalent of modern society today, we are talking about [12:54.880 --> 13:00.600] the British Army, as repugnant as it was to the colonists and as abusive as it was to [13:00.600 --> 13:07.960] the colonists, has now taken form in the police state in American police officers. [13:07.960 --> 13:12.160] They believe themselves to be entirely above the law and untouchable no matter what their [13:12.160 --> 13:20.440] actions, no matter how criminal those actions would be if perpetrated by anyone else. [13:20.440 --> 13:30.520] There is no crime so heinous that the courts will not allow the blue privilege to keep [13:30.520 --> 13:37.280] that officer from being held accountable. We've got rapists, we've got murderers, we've [13:37.280 --> 13:45.000] got child molesters, we've got extortionists, we've got thieves, and they're police officers. [13:45.000 --> 13:50.700] We've got mass murderers that are police officers because there are many of them still on duty [13:50.700 --> 13:58.120] that have killed more than once under questionable circumstances and still have their badge and [13:58.120 --> 14:05.160] still have that red coat, so to speak, that allows them to exercise the king's prerogative [14:05.160 --> 14:16.960] to abuse and steal at will. And they are protected by the attorneys, doesn't [14:16.960 --> 14:24.880] matter what kind of attorney, they're protected by them. The victim will never ever have their [14:24.880 --> 14:31.560] plaintiff's attorney work as hard for them as the defense attorney will work if the defendant [14:31.560 --> 14:39.200] is a police officer. If they are the defense, the victim will never [14:39.200 --> 14:44.080] have their defense attorney work as hard for them as the prosecution will to prove that [14:44.080 --> 14:51.520] the police officer was justified in everything they did and that the real criminal is the [14:51.520 --> 14:55.920] victim. We've seen them do it, we've seen the story [14:55.920 --> 15:00.640] of Hillary Clinton doing the exact same thing to a rape victim and then claiming that she's [15:00.640 --> 15:10.560] for women's rights baloney. She got a rapist off while vilifying the young [15:10.560 --> 15:23.040] girl he raped and laughed about it. This system was supposed to be about justice [15:23.040 --> 15:38.520] and it could not be farther from that perspective than earth is from the horse head nebula. [15:38.520 --> 15:48.560] And the only fault that this is the case rests entirely upon us. [15:48.560 --> 16:00.980] We outnumber the entire collective of attorneys, cops, and public servants in general by dozens [16:00.980 --> 16:11.760] if not literally hundreds to one. And yet they stand head and shoulders above [16:11.760 --> 16:22.880] us in every area to commit criminal acts and abuses while we suffer. [16:22.880 --> 16:28.120] Now I can hear some people out there, the little gears turning, saying oh there's more [16:28.120 --> 16:31.880] than that to it, there's those people behind the scenes with all the money that run everything [16:31.880 --> 16:38.360] and buy the elections and all that. That's true. But they're not doing it personally. [16:38.360 --> 16:43.200] I'm talking about their foot soldiers that are taking it upon themselves to act on their [16:43.200 --> 16:49.480] behalf for a paycheck. Without them those people you're talking about [16:49.480 --> 16:54.560] wouldn't have any power whatsoever. Alright folks, we'll be right back on the [16:54.560 --> 17:01.760] other side of this break. Y'all hang in there. [17:01.760 --> 17:06.040] Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener supported radio network [17:06.040 --> 17:10.600] on top of the on air talent, producers, and other hard working individuals working behind [17:10.600 --> 17:13.160] the scenes. Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by [17:13.160 --> 17:17.480] the generous support of listeners like you. And we appreciate our loyal listeners making [17:17.480 --> 17:22.480] contributions every year on our annual fundraisers, which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio [17:22.480 --> 17:26.160] Network on the air. Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make [17:26.160 --> 17:29.640] your contribution. Every $25 donation enters you for a chance [17:29.640 --> 17:35.160] to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks. First prize being a Spike Skull lower receiver, [17:35.160 --> 17:38.600] second prize being a Taurus Curve. Ten winners will receive gift cards from All [17:38.600 --> 17:41.720] About Vapor. And if you donate your $25 contribution early [17:41.720 --> 17:45.840] enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud. [17:45.840 --> 17:50.240] Donations by all major credit cards are accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin. [17:50.240 --> 17:54.680] The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser. Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more [17:54.680 --> 18:00.080] information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air. [18:00.080 --> 18:05.400] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses? [18:05.400 --> 18:08.840] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [18:08.840 --> 18:13.200] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you [18:13.200 --> 18:16.640] can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain [18:16.640 --> 18:21.960] English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted [18:21.960 --> 18:27.360] by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors [18:27.360 --> 18:32.080] out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay [18:32.080 --> 18:36.400] you to go away. The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution [18:36.400 --> 18:40.640] for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. [18:40.640 --> 18:46.400] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [18:46.400 --> 18:55.400] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s [18:55.400 --> 19:02.400] at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [19:25.400 --> 19:32.400] Thank you very much. [19:56.400 --> 20:01.400] Alright, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. [20:01.400 --> 20:06.400] Okay, now we have some callers up on the board here. Y'all give me just a minute and I'll [20:06.400 --> 20:16.400] start taking those. Calling number is 512-646-1984. Now, along with the opening monologue, folks, [20:16.400 --> 20:22.400] what we need to figure out is, what are we going to continue to do about this? We are [20:22.400 --> 20:30.720] teetering on the brink of economic implosion, all perpetrated by these same attorneys at [20:30.720 --> 20:35.400] every level of government, because they're in every level in every department of government. [20:35.400 --> 20:40.480] They're the ones that are making the laws that allow these banks and these bailouts [20:40.480 --> 20:48.880] and all this other stuff that steals from you and me in order to enrich them directly. [20:48.880 --> 20:57.080] If you think the people in the United States Congress did not get wealthier than any 10,000 [20:57.080 --> 21:07.080] of us off these bailout deals that they financed through our sweat, you better think again. [21:07.080 --> 21:18.600] Do you know that it is perfectly legal for members of Congress to conduct insider trading? [21:18.600 --> 21:22.920] They can use information received only through the power and knowledge available to their [21:22.920 --> 21:32.400] official office for personal enrichment. Do you think they don't know in advance when [21:32.400 --> 21:35.680] these banks are going to go asking for these bailouts, when these other corporations are [21:35.680 --> 21:39.800] going to go asking for these bailouts, and that they don't cut the deals to make sure [21:39.800 --> 21:44.520] that they're going to get rich and fat off whatever gets generated for these folks at [21:44.520 --> 21:56.320] our expense? If you don't see and understand that, you're either high debt or delusional. [21:56.320 --> 22:01.120] And yet you sit back and think that there is going to be a silver bullet to solve this [22:01.120 --> 22:11.280] problem, an easy way to solve this problem, a political way to solve this problem. It's [22:11.280 --> 22:16.240] not going to happen. I hate the thought of it, but it's the facts. It's not going to [22:16.240 --> 22:25.360] happen. And again, if you think it is, well, we'll cover that one again later. [22:25.360 --> 22:32.400] All right. That being said, let's start taking our callers. We have Andrew from Pennsylvania, [22:32.400 --> 22:35.800] or what appears to be Andrew from Pennsylvania. Andrew, go ahead. [22:35.800 --> 22:43.200] Yes, Eddie, it is me. And this whole experience that I had with Arizona and how it played [22:43.200 --> 22:49.440] out kind of makes me want to have to ask you a question about the in-practice use of your [22:49.440 --> 22:55.080] red light camera letter, which can in theory be converted into a letter to fight, like [22:55.080 --> 22:59.480] a speeding ticket or like a toll booth citation. If you reword- [22:59.480 --> 23:04.160] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Where did you get that theory from? [23:04.160 --> 23:09.000] Why can't it be? I mean, it's basically the same idea, like a camera films you with the [23:09.000 --> 23:14.040] red light. Likewise, a camera would film you with a speeding ticket or like running a toll [23:14.040 --> 23:18.280] booth. So I would think the same principle would hold true that you can- [23:18.280 --> 23:26.080] Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute. As far as camera citations go, yes. As far as any [23:26.080 --> 23:33.080] citation goes, no. It would only, that red light camera letter would work more or less [23:33.080 --> 23:40.540] only in places where any of those offenses are themselves civil infractions. The difference [23:40.540 --> 23:47.700] there being that there is no stop in seizure in the camera ticket, like there would be [23:47.700 --> 23:53.160] when the cop pulls you over directly, which of course he would not have had any probable [23:53.160 --> 24:02.400] cause to do because there was no criminal offense being committed in his presence review. [24:02.400 --> 24:07.080] So you can't convert it to anything. So I just want to be clear on that. [24:07.080 --> 24:13.440] Right, right. But what I wanted to ask is just to give a rundown of the whole Arizona [24:13.440 --> 24:21.640] thing. Randy Kelton told me file like a motion to dismiss, motion to sue and motion for removal. [24:21.640 --> 24:29.080] And I did using his documents on jurisimprudence.com. And I assumed everything was going to be okay [24:29.080 --> 24:33.520] because they send my mother who bailed me out of jail or money. And Randy told me that's [24:33.520 --> 24:38.520] a good indication. They don't want to pursue the case any further. But they did apparently [24:38.520 --> 24:44.320] run my name through a computer system, which made them see, okay, let's try to prosecute [24:44.320 --> 24:48.280] the case because well, I guess because they need the money and everything. So I'm not [24:48.280 --> 24:52.240] going to shift blame to Randy or anything. I probably could have, should have been aware [24:52.240 --> 24:56.840] that they were going to do that. But anyway, the one thing I want to bring up about this [24:56.840 --> 25:04.480] is in theory, in practice, if someone were like, get a red light camera ticket a thousand [25:04.480 --> 25:09.480] miles away from home, and they were like, they live in Pennsylvania, like I do, and [25:09.480 --> 25:14.200] they got a red light camera letter traveling in their car in like the state of California, [25:14.200 --> 25:20.600] well, way over a thousand miles away. And they decide to get a letter from the law enforcement [25:20.600 --> 25:26.280] people in California saying, okay, we caught you, pay a fine. And they try to use your [25:26.280 --> 25:33.680] red light camera letter to fight the case. Well, let's imagine you do that. And then [25:33.680 --> 25:38.800] several months down the line, they prosecute the case against you. They say they file another [25:38.800 --> 25:41.920] motion saying, okay, charges impressed against you. Now I bring this- [25:41.920 --> 25:48.400] Now wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. There are no charges. Okay. There [25:48.400 --> 25:56.600] aren't any. It's civil. This is entirely 100% administrative. Okay. What you're not understanding [25:56.600 --> 26:02.360] about an administrative process versus a criminal process is, is they absolutely can take your [26:02.360 --> 26:08.640] money in absentia. They don't need you to be present. They give you the opportunity, [26:08.640 --> 26:14.240] but if you don't show it's considered waived, since it's an administrative process, no big [26:14.240 --> 26:20.840] deal. Now that makes it an unconstitutional bill [26:20.840 --> 26:28.040] of pains and penalties. Since there's no judicial review, is there? Is there judicial review [26:28.040 --> 26:35.320] of these types of citations in Arizona? No. [26:35.320 --> 26:42.800] How do you know that? I looked into it way back. [26:42.800 --> 26:47.800] So you're positive that if you appeal the ruling, you don't get to see an actual judge [26:47.800 --> 26:55.680] with an actual jury. If I appeal the ruling, no, not positive [26:55.680 --> 26:59.720] on that one. Well, that was my question. So how can you [26:59.720 --> 27:09.840] be both positive and not positive? Got me there. All right. Good. You got me [27:09.840 --> 27:17.800] there pal. But anyway, what I wanted to ask you about this whole issue of being over a [27:17.800 --> 27:25.880] thousand miles away, if they prosecute a case against you and you are like way away from [27:25.880 --> 27:32.080] the line, like way out of the state and like, well, like I was, Randy Kelton told me it [27:32.080 --> 27:38.960] would cost you thousands more, well, a thousand more, a lot more to fight the case and traveling [27:38.960 --> 27:46.920] back and forth to Arizona, fighting as a pro se, than what to just hire an attorney to [27:46.920 --> 27:51.040] fight for you. And even though the attorney is not going to fight the case using the right [27:51.040 --> 27:57.560] to travel, you're still going to end up paying less money simply because you hire them. [27:57.560 --> 28:00.760] So- Well, that part's generally correct. That's [28:00.760 --> 28:06.560] an economic answer right there. If you can't afford to fly or travel back and forth that [28:06.560 --> 28:11.320] far every time you have a court date, you know, that would add up pretty quick, I would [28:11.320 --> 28:18.080] think considering to a one-time fee to an attorney to either get it dismissed or whatever. [28:18.080 --> 28:24.400] So as far as the economic side of that goes, Randy's absolutely correct. Unless you fly [28:24.400 --> 28:32.680] or travel for free. Which I can't do. So getting back to your thing, [28:32.680 --> 28:37.400] just so I'm not confused about this, you're telling me that if you were to file a red [28:37.400 --> 28:43.920] light camera letter with a state that's over a thousand miles away, they would not send [28:43.920 --> 28:50.200] you a notice saying you got to appear because- I didn't say they wouldn't send you a notice. [28:50.200 --> 28:55.240] Where the hell did I ever say that? You didn't, but I'm trying to clarify that [28:55.240 --> 28:58.760] issue as to whether or not that's- Of course they're going to send you a notice. [28:58.760 --> 29:04.320] That's part of the administrative process. They can't take your money without providing [29:04.320 --> 29:07.800] notice. Yeah. [29:07.800 --> 29:13.620] That's your opportunity to appear and argue. It's up to you whether or not you take it. [29:13.620 --> 29:19.200] But if you don't, they're not a stopper for moving forward because it's administrative [29:19.200 --> 29:31.400] and not criminal. All right. So when you- it doesn't make from [29:31.400 --> 29:38.240] an economic standpoint, you would actually- there are cases where even though it may cost [29:38.240 --> 29:42.280] you more money just for the sake of trying to keep the money out of their pocket, you [29:42.280 --> 29:46.280] may want to pay a little extra money to fight them. [29:46.280 --> 29:50.200] Okay. Hang on just a second, Andrew, and we'll try to pick this back up on the other side. [29:50.200 --> 30:01.560] All right, folks. Call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back after this break. [30:01.560 --> 30:06.080] We all know the FBI likes getting citizens to inform on their friends, but did you know [30:06.080 --> 30:10.640] Facebook is now up to the same dirty tricks? I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll tell [30:10.640 --> 30:16.720] you how Facebook is turning users into snitches that rat each other out next. [30:16.720 --> 30:21.240] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back [30:21.240 --> 30:27.040] again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:27.040 --> 30:33.280] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, [30:33.280 --> 30:38.360] it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private [30:38.360 --> 30:45.560] search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage. [30:45.560 --> 30:50.680] In an age where every crumb of personal data is prized by snoopy governments and shady [30:50.680 --> 30:55.560] marketers, pseudonyms are shields of freedom. Fake names help us connect on the web without [30:55.560 --> 31:01.360] having to trade our most precious asset, privacy. But now Facebook is asking users to snitch [31:01.360 --> 31:06.600] on friends who use aliases, and it's got me hopping mad. By showing people's accounts [31:06.600 --> 31:11.680] to their Facebook friends and asking what that person's real name is, Facebook is assaulting [31:11.680 --> 31:17.040] a basic freedom to call ourselves whatever we choose, except, of course, on official [31:17.040 --> 31:22.040] documents. Facebook is not your friend, it's a snoop. Don't let it breach your trust with [31:22.040 --> 31:27.320] your real friends. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private [31:27.320 --> 31:28.320] search engine. [31:28.320 --> 31:36.920] What are you thinking? Microplant powder with iodine and probiotics, or a total body detox [31:36.920 --> 31:43.200] for around $10 a month? If USA.org has 12 formulations of microplant powder for absorbing [31:43.200 --> 31:48.120] and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lung, stomach, and colon, and feel [31:48.120 --> 31:53.800] better than ever, it alkalizes. Oxygen A kills parasites, does the job of 10 products. That [31:53.800 --> 32:00.800] saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367 or visit usa.org. [32:00.800 --> 32:06.960] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America, [32:06.960 --> 32:09.920] we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have [32:09.920 --> 32:13.960] a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those [32:13.960 --> 32:17.160] rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own [32:17.160 --> 32:21.160] private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts [32:21.160 --> 32:25.160] afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights [32:25.160 --> 32:28.920] through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law [32:28.920 --> 32:32.440] Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you [32:32.440 --> 32:36.480] understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get [32:36.480 --> 32:40.520] your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering [32:40.520 --> 32:44.480] your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation [32:44.480 --> 32:48.920] Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of [32:48.920 --> 32:52.640] research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights [32:52.640 --> 32:57.280] with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can [32:57.280 --> 33:00.280] have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:00.280 --> 33:21.640] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. Yeah, I got a warrant, and I gonna solve them, [33:21.640 --> 33:36.080] to the government them, prosecute them. Okay. All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule [33:36.080 --> 33:43.400] of Law Radio, and calling numbers 512-646-1984, and we are talking with Andrew in Pennsylvania. [33:43.400 --> 33:47.760] All right, Andrew, please continue. Yeah, can we backtrack for just a moment? When [33:47.760 --> 33:52.400] you asked me that thing about the judicial thing, I think I may have confused judicial [33:52.400 --> 33:56.800] with criminal, and I need to backtrack to that whole conversation that you had with [33:56.800 --> 34:01.960] me and Randy. You were talking about the whole issue of civil versus criminal. You kept saying [34:01.960 --> 34:06.560] it was civil, but I didn't want to interrupt you guys at the time, but no, my case was [34:06.560 --> 34:13.240] criminal, because I was alleged going over 90 miles per hour, which in Arizona is criminal, [34:13.240 --> 34:16.480] and when you asked me the thing about judicial, I think that was when I said, yeah, I looked [34:16.480 --> 34:23.640] it up. I was confusing judicial with criminal. So, am I confused? Am I assumed to... [34:23.640 --> 34:28.320] Okay, if it was actually criminal, and you didn't show up, then there would definitely [34:28.320 --> 34:35.600] be repercussions for not doing that, especially considering that Arizona has an interstate [34:35.600 --> 34:46.800] license compact with Texas, and well, not with, I'm sorry, with Pennsylvania. [34:46.800 --> 34:56.240] All right, so makes sense, but in practice, when you're fighting the case, like Randy [34:56.240 --> 35:01.640] told me, they got so much advantage against you because you're over a thousand miles away. [35:01.640 --> 35:05.560] When I told you that, you were like, well, don't give me that. Well, I was like, well, [35:05.560 --> 35:10.120] I'm just repeating what Randy told me, not to shift blame on Randy, but I mean, maybe [35:10.120 --> 35:16.320] I didn't do enough research to figure out what I can do so they could not have an advantage [35:16.320 --> 35:23.800] over me because I am over a thousand miles away from them after they prosecuted the case. [35:23.800 --> 35:29.480] So maybe give me a little lecture here and advice. What should I have done to prevent [35:29.480 --> 35:31.560] them from having an advantage over me? [35:31.560 --> 35:36.040] Well, you're at a disadvantage the moment you get entangled in the system, whether it's [35:36.040 --> 35:42.960] a thousand miles away or right there where you live. That's problem number one. The deal [35:42.960 --> 35:47.360] there is always the same, Andrew. You asked me to tell you something I've told you a thousand [35:47.360 --> 35:53.640] times, and that is if you're going to play the game, understand the rules. Okay? And [35:53.640 --> 35:59.280] that applies to whatever venue the game is actually being held in. You have to understand [35:59.280 --> 36:04.760] that venues rules. They play Monopoly quite differently in Pennsylvania than they do in [36:04.760 --> 36:11.120] Texas. You understand? Yeah. Everybody's got their own little house rules they change [36:11.120 --> 36:19.640] up the game with. So when you challenge what they're doing, how do you do that without [36:19.640 --> 36:26.840] knowing the rules? It's a bad idea, of course. Generally speaking, yeah, except for sheer [36:26.840 --> 36:34.680] dumb luck and most people don't have luck that good. So the facts are even though you [36:34.680 --> 36:41.800] could have still attacked it on the issue of does the law apply or doesn't it apply, [36:41.800 --> 36:47.680] you don't know it well enough to know. And what did you do it to stop? Did you give up [36:47.680 --> 36:50.680] a license or any of the accouterments? [36:50.680 --> 36:59.920] No, no, no. I followed your script and I left the window rolled down. It was my mistake. [36:59.920 --> 37:04.360] And after I sent the part to your attitude demeanor and that part of the script the officer [37:04.360 --> 37:11.480] lost his cool and grabbed me out of the car and everything. So I repeated one other thing [37:11.480 --> 37:16.140] I kind of did wrong was I repeatedly told him I'm not operating in a far higher capacity [37:16.140 --> 37:20.320] and I was hoping he would acknowledge that he was so informed. But at that I should have [37:20.320 --> 37:25.280] only said that once. It wasn't really necessary for me to repeat that over and over again. [37:25.280 --> 37:31.120] And I mean, this officer, this is a case of the officer because of his ignorance and stupidity [37:31.120 --> 37:41.520] and bad attitude, probably would have broken the window down if I rolled it up. But I guess [37:41.520 --> 37:48.480] I really wanted to make this call to you tonight to clarify like if it's a distance factor [37:48.480 --> 37:55.400] and does it like make more sense like in my case to pay a little extra money to fight [37:55.400 --> 38:00.840] pro se right to travel rather than hire a lawyer in the case they're prosecuting against [38:00.840 --> 38:02.160] you. And I thought maybe... [38:02.160 --> 38:09.800] Well, that depends. If you inherited from Hugh Hefner, knock yourself out. Okay. But [38:09.800 --> 38:13.400] if you don't have the funds to do it, you're asking me to tell you what your finances are. [38:13.400 --> 38:19.360] Hell, I don't know. I know what mine are. I couldn't afford to do either one, but I'm [38:19.360 --> 38:22.320] going to do something. [38:22.320 --> 38:32.160] Yeah. And there are... You would think there would have to be ways for me to not have to... [38:32.160 --> 38:39.120] Before I hired the lawyer, I could have like maybe played game of chess where I sent paperwork [38:39.120 --> 38:47.400] to Arizona like the Juris Dictionary website. They talk about how before you actually go [38:47.400 --> 38:49.120] to trial, you try to... [38:49.120 --> 38:55.160] No, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Stop, stop, stop, stop, stop. Don't cite Juris Dictionary. [38:55.160 --> 39:00.960] Juris Dictionary is for civil lawsuits. When you're going to sue someone else, it doesn't [39:00.960 --> 39:05.800] have a damn thing to do with what we're talking about here. This is a criminal case. They [39:05.800 --> 39:07.440] don't work the same. [39:07.440 --> 39:11.360] Yeah. So there's no way you can like try to win the case. [39:11.360 --> 39:17.680] No, stop, stop, stop, stop. No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying don't cite Juris Dictionary [39:17.680 --> 39:23.360] as the source of the process because it's not the same process. Of course, you're going [39:23.360 --> 39:30.600] to file documentation. What is the first thing I tell you to do after you get a citation? [39:30.600 --> 39:36.360] You go down and you file your affidavit of not engaging in commerce on the highways. [39:36.360 --> 39:41.640] You go down and file your first set of preliminary motions just as fast as you can. [39:41.640 --> 39:48.520] Now, folks, this brings up one other point that I don't know if I've mentioned before [39:48.520 --> 39:53.440] but I'm going to make darn sure to mention it now since it's fresh on my mind. I don't [39:53.440 --> 39:59.160] care that you got a copy of the citation from the cop. The first time you go in or the first [39:59.160 --> 40:03.960] time you request records from that court, you make darn sure to get a copy front and [40:03.960 --> 40:09.560] back of every single page of that citation that was filed with that court. [40:09.560 --> 40:14.520] And the reason for that is because sometimes these cops and these courts cooperate together [40:14.520 --> 40:19.260] to undermine the defense before they ever appear. And they do that by the cops making [40:19.260 --> 40:27.760] handwritten notes on the court's copy of the citation but not the accused copy. In other [40:27.760 --> 40:35.680] words, they're passing information and messages directly to the judge via the citation. [40:35.680 --> 40:41.920] And they'll do things like they'll write bad attitude, know it all, jailhouse lawyer, [40:41.920 --> 40:45.520] stuff like that on there that will tell the court exactly what they need to know to say [40:45.520 --> 40:51.440] you think you know better than us, huh? Well, let us show you. [40:51.440 --> 40:59.040] So always get a copy of the citation that was filed, not just the one in your hand. [40:59.040 --> 41:04.520] Now as far as what you could do, Andrew, of course you can file all of the necessary motions [41:04.520 --> 41:11.160] to get it dismissed beforehand. But the advantage Randy's talking about them having is, is if [41:11.160 --> 41:20.120] they call a motions hearing and they don't allow telephony as an access to that hearing, [41:20.120 --> 41:31.120] then guess what? That was a clue for you to jump in and say, I've got a- [41:31.120 --> 41:34.080] Hire a lawyer. Well, that was- [41:34.080 --> 41:38.720] What's the lawyer going to do with any documentation you filed, Andrew? And they set a motions [41:38.720 --> 41:41.920] hearing for it. What's the lawyer going to do for you then? [41:41.920 --> 41:47.160] Probably whatever, of course, they have the advantage to get the dollar, get the extra- [41:47.160 --> 41:52.720] No, he's not going to do anything. He can't go into that. He is not going to go into that [41:52.720 --> 42:00.800] courtroom for your hearing on something you filed. [42:00.800 --> 42:01.800] You get it? [42:01.800 --> 42:04.120] Yeah, I really, yeah, yeah, of course. [42:04.120 --> 42:14.760] So that means you have to do what? [42:14.760 --> 42:20.480] That means you have to make the trip. That's the advantage Randy's talking about. [42:20.480 --> 42:29.320] Okay. I didn't really want to do that though. [42:29.320 --> 42:32.960] Well, from the sounds of things, it's a little too late to think about what you don't want [42:32.960 --> 42:37.920] to do. They've already done it for you. The problem I'm having is, is you're saying that [42:37.920 --> 42:43.680] they found you guilty. They can't conduct a criminal trial in absentia unless the accused [42:43.680 --> 42:50.640] was there at the beginning of the trial. You follow? [42:50.640 --> 42:57.840] And I wasn't there. Yeah. Now I follow. [42:57.840 --> 43:02.040] And if that's the case, how then can this have been criminal if they found you guilty [43:02.040 --> 43:06.440] or say you owe them money? [43:06.440 --> 43:14.640] Exactly. But now you're so sure that it is because it was 90 miles an hour. Is it or [43:14.640 --> 43:19.520] isn't it? Once again, we have a contradiction here. [43:19.520 --> 43:29.960] Yeah, we do. And I made the mistake of assuming that I knew what the case was. [43:29.960 --> 43:35.840] Okay. Well, so far it sounds like you're doing a whole lot of assuming and very little actual [43:35.840 --> 43:41.800] reading. Okay. You need to fix that problem. [43:41.800 --> 43:46.200] No problem. All right. I appreciate you calling in, man. [43:46.200 --> 43:49.400] I'm going to take somebody else on the other side. I've had you for this whole segment. [43:49.400 --> 43:51.200] Okay? Take care. Take care. [43:51.200 --> 43:57.200] All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio 512-646-1984. We'll be right back after this [43:57.200 --> 43:58.200] break. [43:58.200 --> 44:07.400] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary, [44:07.400 --> 44:14.080] the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by [44:14.080 --> 44:15.080] step. [44:15.080 --> 44:20.720] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, [44:20.720 --> 44:26.000] know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and [44:26.000 --> 44:32.840] now you can too. JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning [44:32.840 --> 44:38.760] experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [44:38.760 --> 44:44.240] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio [44:44.240 --> 44:51.280] classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much [44:51.280 --> 45:00.720] more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [45:00.720 --> 45:09.440] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our [45:09.440 --> 45:14.760] store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas, buying Brave New Books and [45:14.760 --> 45:18.880] J-Tank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [45:18.880 --> 45:23.920] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [45:23.920 --> 45:27.920] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Eme oil, [45:27.920 --> 45:36.080] lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find [45:36.080 --> 45:44.520] us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. Don't [45:44.520 --> 45:49.960] forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com. [46:14.520 --> 46:41.480] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. The call-in number is 512-646-1984 [46:41.480 --> 46:46.560] and now we are going to Jeff in Mississippi. Jeff, what can we do for you? [46:46.560 --> 46:50.000] Hey, Randy, or Eddie, thanks for having me on. [46:50.000 --> 46:51.000] Yes, sir. [46:51.000 --> 46:57.520] Okay, I've got two questions. One of them is pretty quick and easy. I'm going through [46:57.520 --> 47:05.760] a federal civil case and we're batting back and forth responses and answers and I've called [47:05.760 --> 47:10.120] you about this problem before and it's still going on. It's driving me crazy. We're going [47:10.120 --> 47:14.960] back and forth, back and forth, little piddly stuff, but I keep responding because I don't [47:14.960 --> 47:23.480] want to default. So, can I file a motion for judgment on the pleadings? Can I do that to [47:23.480 --> 47:26.200] stop them? I'm the plaintiff. [47:26.200 --> 47:29.840] What is the criteria for filing such a motion? [47:29.840 --> 47:38.960] I have read in, okay, I'm trying to remember, in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it [47:38.960 --> 47:46.760] says that the defendant can do it against the complaint, but then I got on an attorney's [47:46.760 --> 47:53.960] blog and the attorney's blog said that the plaintiff can do it to stop the defendants [47:53.960 --> 47:59.160] from all these playing games with all these answers and responses. So, I'm kind of split [47:59.160 --> 48:01.280] down the middle. I don't know. [48:01.280 --> 48:05.600] Well, you can file it and the court can deny it and that's that. [48:05.600 --> 48:06.600] Okay. [48:06.600 --> 48:10.800] It's not going to hurt to do it, is it? You didn't see anything that said there's a downside [48:10.800 --> 48:11.800] to filing one. [48:11.800 --> 48:16.240] Oh, no. No. I just wanted to know if it's effective to please them. [48:16.240 --> 48:19.880] Well, don't know. If you don't have an example of it having been done from the plaintiff's [48:19.880 --> 48:24.960] side before, rather than just a discussion of theoretical probability or possibility, [48:24.960 --> 48:28.000] I can't answer that any more than you can. [48:28.000 --> 48:38.360] Okay. Okay. My second question is, I'm suing a college, a university, right? And they are [48:38.360 --> 48:46.120] claiming immunity, right? And one thing that I heard, I listened to a podcast, I have not [48:46.120 --> 48:53.360] seen this in the law, but it made sense. The person doing the podcast said that if an attorney, [48:53.360 --> 48:59.880] let's say an attorney, an officer of the court of the state does something to you and you [48:59.880 --> 49:05.800] file a complaint with the bar, or if it's a judge, you file a complaint with the judicial [49:05.800 --> 49:14.320] review, their supervisors, if the supervisors do not do anything to help you, then that [49:14.320 --> 49:17.800] strips them of their immunity. Is that true? [49:17.800 --> 49:18.800] No. [49:18.800 --> 49:20.640] That is not true. Okay. [49:20.640 --> 49:26.520] Not that I'm aware of, because immunity is not based upon what assistance they give you. [49:26.520 --> 49:32.440] Immunity is based upon what happened and what the law is on the subject. Here's the situation. [49:32.440 --> 49:38.280] Official, qualified and sovereign. Okay? Those are the forms of immunity that they can try [49:38.280 --> 49:45.000] to claim. In order for them to qualify for any of those immunities, the very first requirement [49:45.000 --> 49:50.880] is that they must be acting governmentally. Okay? If it's not associated with their official [49:50.880 --> 50:01.960] capacity, their immunity does not apply, ever. Okay. Now, if this university did not own [50:01.960 --> 50:07.440] the property where this occurred, that room you were staying in there, and they had a [50:07.440 --> 50:15.800] contract agreement with that, now we're talking about a commercial exercise. Okay? [50:15.800 --> 50:23.280] There is case law that says when the government acts in commerce through contract, it has [50:23.280 --> 50:31.080] no immunities, because it is just as any other corporation would be when engaging in that [50:31.080 --> 50:39.880] process. So here is my theory on your situation in this regard. If the university did not [50:39.880 --> 50:44.720] own the apartment complex or the dorm complex where this took place, and it was not actually [50:44.720 --> 50:48.880] on university property, which we know it wasn't, correct? [50:48.880 --> 50:50.720] Mm-hmm. That's right. [50:50.720 --> 50:57.760] Okay? If they were contracted with this building or corporation and owned this building or [50:57.760 --> 51:06.240] whatever to provide dorm rooms for university students, then we have a commercial engagement [51:06.240 --> 51:13.360] with this entity where they used their so-called university authority to do something that [51:13.360 --> 51:21.320] they couldn't do because they had no governmental authority in that building. [51:21.320 --> 51:25.160] Okay. Okay? [51:25.160 --> 51:30.200] So there, there's simply somebody else that was guilty of invading a private residence [51:30.200 --> 51:35.720] without a warrant, without probable cause, and without any criminal act in order to commit [51:35.720 --> 51:40.520] crimes themselves. They don't have immunity for that. [51:40.520 --> 51:47.640] Okay. Now that's a working theory, but to me it [51:47.640 --> 51:51.320] would sound right based upon the case law. [51:51.320 --> 51:59.120] Yes. And my problem is, is that when I allege these in my complaint, I've got a pretty [51:59.120 --> 52:03.720] good solid complaint. I'm not any good at complaints, but it's just like you said, it's [52:03.720 --> 52:10.120] good and solid. They're coming back responses of silly stuff, like, yeah, we do have immunity, [52:10.120 --> 52:14.480] and it's just, yeah, we are. No, you're not. Yeah, we are. No, you're not. And I've sent [52:14.480 --> 52:19.320] back about 20 or 30 different answers and responses, and it's driving me crazy. So I'm [52:19.320 --> 52:23.840] wanting to shut these people down. Yeah, this is how they drive up your cost [52:23.840 --> 52:33.320] and make you bail. Because you have to pay for service on everyone when you answer one. [52:33.320 --> 52:40.440] Okay. This is exactly why lawsuits are expensive, because of these attorneys games. Remember [52:40.440 --> 52:44.360] how I started this show, folks, about the attorneys? This is a prime example of what [52:44.360 --> 52:49.080] I'm talking about. They control the system. They set the rules. They make it where they've [52:49.080 --> 52:54.280] benefit from the game while you suffer, even when you are supposed to be the one seeking [52:54.280 --> 53:01.320] justice for their illegal actions. Now you know why I've got a fundraiser for [53:01.320 --> 53:09.320] $25,000 for a lawsuit. Because I have no idea how much it will cost. All I can do is guesstimate [53:09.320 --> 53:17.440] how much it will probably cost. So I feel your pain there as far as that goes, the money [53:17.440 --> 53:20.640] and all that. But that's what they're doing. They're trying to make you go broke so you [53:20.640 --> 53:25.800] can't complete the lawsuit. Well, another thing they're doing is, and it's [53:25.800 --> 53:31.520] working, is they throw so many documents at you that after about six months, you start [53:31.520 --> 53:34.760] forgetting which one you actually responded to. [53:34.760 --> 53:38.000] Right. And so I'm getting that panicked feeling of, [53:38.000 --> 53:42.320] oh, no, did I forget to respond to document number two? [53:42.320 --> 53:47.720] Okay. I'm going to give you a little clue about how to handle that. Make yourself a [53:47.720 --> 53:54.440] whiteboard battle board. Every time you receive something that requires a response, you add [53:54.440 --> 54:00.280] it to the board and you put a status up there with it. Okay? I don't care how you make the [54:00.280 --> 54:06.880] status legible to yourself, colored ink, a pen, a magnet, I don't care. But just so you [54:06.880 --> 54:14.320] know what the status of that document is. Received on such and such date. Keep that information [54:14.320 --> 54:18.800] up there all the time. The very first thing you do, write down what you got, the date [54:18.800 --> 54:23.920] it was postmarked, the date you actually received it, and the date it's due to be responded [54:23.920 --> 54:29.160] to. Then you put out there next to the status whatever status it's in. And you keep everything [54:29.160 --> 54:34.680] tracked on that board, on that computer, something you can look at readily and easily and identify [54:34.680 --> 54:40.440] where you are with everything. Okay. A key to one of the biggest keys to fighting any [54:40.440 --> 54:52.160] court battle, especially a lawsuit, is to manage your tasks. Would filing a motion for [54:52.160 --> 54:58.640] sanctions help to stop this? If you can show that the purpose of their actions is for delay [54:58.640 --> 55:08.600] or abuse of process, absolutely. Yeah. Okay. We're going to do that. That's my next move. [55:08.600 --> 55:13.840] Okay. Okay. Well, that answers my question. Thank you very much. I'll let you move on [55:13.840 --> 55:18.800] to the next caller. All right, Jeff. Thanks for calling in. Thanks. All right. Now we're [55:18.800 --> 55:25.000] going to go to Tom in Maryland. Tom, what can we do for you? Hey, Eddie. How did you [55:25.000 --> 55:30.360] know it was me? Well, that's what it came up with. Obviously, you must have called in [55:30.360 --> 55:34.880] at some point before. I did. I did. All right. Quickly, I just wanted to, I wanted to, I'm [55:34.880 --> 55:40.120] having a really hard time getting a straight answer from our lovely court system here in [55:40.120 --> 55:47.000] Maryland about the difference between the civil and criminal infraction. And I contact [55:47.000 --> 55:52.360] the court and the answer I get from them is that it's not a, it's neither. It's a citation. [55:52.360 --> 55:56.880] No, there ain't, there ain't no such thing as neither. I'll tell you what they're attempting [55:56.880 --> 56:02.640] to get you to accept. They're going to call it quasi criminal. And here's what that actually [56:02.640 --> 56:12.280] means in legal parlance. It is a civil suit handled under criminal rules. It's a complete [56:12.280 --> 56:17.300] violation of every form of constitutional prohibition on bills of pains and penalties [56:17.300 --> 56:23.760] you can imagine. We've got a civil item being handled as if it was a criminal item under [56:23.760 --> 56:30.200] a set of rules that don't actually apply to it. Now, if you get them to admit that, here [56:30.200 --> 56:37.120] is their problem. If the court is admitting that the action itself is civil, but they're [56:37.120 --> 56:42.000] going to play the game by the criminal rules, then what they've admitted is that the officer [56:42.000 --> 56:48.200] could never have gotten probable cause to apprehend you in the first place. It would [56:48.200 --> 56:53.960] be in that case, exactly the same thing as a civil infraction. There is no authority [56:53.960 --> 57:01.640] to apprehend without a warrant for something civil because probable cause and reasonable [57:01.640 --> 57:11.880] suspicion do not exist. They only exist in relation to crimes. If the court cannot articulate [57:11.880 --> 57:19.280] and the officer cannot articulate and the prosecution cannot articulate a crime, then [57:19.280 --> 57:25.200] they cannot articulate probable cause, making their very first action at the point of contact [57:25.200 --> 57:31.280] with the police officer illegal because there was no warrant and it was an illegal search [57:31.280 --> 57:39.320] and seizure of the person. Okay. So what you need to do is write a motion [57:39.320 --> 57:43.640] to dismiss based upon the information you have received, naming the person you received [57:43.640 --> 57:51.760] it from and stating that absent proper notice of the actual nature of the allegations, this [57:51.760 --> 57:57.520] court cannot possibly have established proper jurisdiction through the prosecution because [57:57.520 --> 58:02.680] without a proper nature and cause, I haven't received my proper notice. You haven't been [58:02.680 --> 58:10.320] invested with jurisdiction. This is a non-case. You follow? [58:10.320 --> 58:17.720] Following that motion, I do that before the hearing and when I send my, do I even need [58:17.720 --> 58:24.440] to send a ticket in and check that box because then I do want to go to trial, request a trial. [58:24.440 --> 58:28.300] Don't give away that ticket. You need that ticket. That's something that you can use [58:28.300 --> 58:33.400] against them later. Okay. Make a copy of it and attach it if you [58:33.400 --> 58:35.920] need to, but yes, file the motion before the hearing. [58:35.920 --> 58:41.600] File the motion before the hearing, but I do need to send it in and request the trial. [58:41.600 --> 58:46.480] Yeah. Okay. Well, hang on Tom. We'll finish this up on the other side. All right, folks. [58:46.480 --> 58:52.920] 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. The Bible remains the most popular book in [58:52.920 --> 58:58.600] the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some [58:58.600 --> 59:04.000] new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise [59:04.000 --> 59:11.040] the profound meaning of the scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation [59:11.040 --> 59:16.960] is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory [59:16.960 --> 59:22.880] footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing [59:22.880 --> 59:28.400] an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.400 --> 59:33.520] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.520 --> 59:43.960] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:43.960 --> 59:51.600] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. You are listening [59:51.600 --> 01:00:00.800] to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.800 --> 01:00:06.000] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli [01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:13.600] bulletins for the commodities market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop [01:00:13.600 --> 01:00:24.720] into the tides of the alternatives. Markets for Friday, April 15, 2016 are currently treading [01:00:24.720 --> 01:00:34.200] with gold at $1,233.72 an ounce, silver at $16.21 an ounce, Texas crude at $40.36 a barrel [01:00:34.200 --> 01:00:44.560] and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $430 U.S. currency. [01:00:44.560 --> 01:00:50.520] Today in history, the year 1865, Abraham Lincoln is shot at Ford's Theater in Washington, [01:00:50.520 --> 01:00:59.880] D.C. Honest Abe died today in history. In recent years, 22 Texas Republican district [01:00:59.880 --> 01:01:05.080] or county conventions passed resolutions calling for a vote on state secession in March. Though [01:01:05.080 --> 01:01:09.720] only 10 responded and actually validated the passage of such resolutions, an official count [01:01:09.720 --> 01:01:14.040] should be available from the Republican Party of Texas in early May. Last year, the Texas [01:01:14.040 --> 01:01:18.020] nationalist movement made headlines with a statewide tour of speaking events seeking [01:01:18.020 --> 01:01:22.560] enough signatures to get secession on the GOP primary ballot. Daniel Miller, the group's [01:01:22.560 --> 01:01:27.000] president said that they came close but not close enough. However, as a result, recruited [01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:32.000] and trained a lot of volunteers from Amarillo to San Antonio. Supporters of an independent [01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:36.720] Texas promote such efforts because of federal overreach, corruption and excessive spending, [01:01:36.720 --> 01:01:40.200] not to mention the reality of Texas being large and economically independent enough [01:01:40.200 --> 01:01:45.000] to actually go it alone. And though the Supreme Court ruled in 1869 that states do not have [01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:48.920] the right to secede, secessionists are pointing out that these rulings will have no binding [01:01:48.920 --> 01:01:52.440] once the state declares independence. Federalists are warning that the federal government will [01:01:52.440 --> 01:01:56.840] be obligated to use force against such a move since it would be considered rebellion under [01:01:56.840 --> 01:01:59.760] federal regulation. [01:01:59.760 --> 01:02:06.200] 150 federal to state law enforcement from various agencies assisted the Seguin police [01:02:06.200 --> 01:02:10.080] department with dozens of arrest warrants targeting Mexican mafia operations trafficking [01:02:10.080 --> 01:02:14.520] heroin and cocaine into Seguin and new brothels. This mass coordinated effort, 18 months in [01:02:14.520 --> 01:02:18.960] the planning, was set in motion when indictments unsealed Friday charged defendants with conspiracy [01:02:18.960 --> 01:02:23.080] to possess and intent to distribute controlled substances. Authorities suspect those rounded [01:02:23.080 --> 01:02:26.840] up are responsible for distributing heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine into Seguin and [01:02:26.840 --> 01:02:31.520] new brothels since 2010. The alleged leader of the mafia lieutenant is among the people [01:02:31.520 --> 01:02:35.480] arrested. Police say that these networks supply drugs from Austin to Houston and are believed [01:02:35.480 --> 01:02:39.400] to even have ties within the Texas prison system. It does seem police have found themselves [01:02:39.400 --> 01:02:43.720] a cozy permanent job waging the drug war. Unfortunately, these indefinite efforts will [01:02:43.720 --> 01:02:48.040] continue to remain so because of the criminalization of drugs themselves, consequently bringing [01:02:48.040 --> 01:02:53.040] cartels, violence, smuggling and millions of tax dollars gone to waste. [01:03:18.040 --> 01:03:33.600] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984. [01:03:33.600 --> 01:03:37.440] We've got one more hour left in the show. That is four segments and we are talking with [01:03:37.440 --> 01:03:41.960] Tom in Maryland. All right, Tom, now before we went to break, you mentioned sending in [01:03:41.960 --> 01:03:44.640] notice requesting a trial, right? [01:03:44.640 --> 01:03:46.000] Correct. [01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:51.240] Why would you be requesting a trial when you're also at the same time saying, you don't have [01:03:51.240 --> 01:03:54.640] jurisdiction, you aren't a proper court? [01:03:54.640 --> 01:04:01.520] Right, right, right. That's why I'm asking you the question. Yeah, it doesn't make sense, [01:04:01.520 --> 01:04:07.920] so I'm not going to do that. I'm going to file a motion to dismiss and wait for a response. [01:04:07.920 --> 01:04:09.360] Of course, all certified. [01:04:09.360 --> 01:04:14.480] Well, not just a motion to dismiss, you're going to cite a motion to dismiss on several [01:04:14.480 --> 01:04:23.080] legal grounds. Improper, insufficient and untimely notice, improper notice of the nature [01:04:23.080 --> 01:04:27.720] and cause, even though that nature and cause has been demanded. My question is though, [01:04:27.720 --> 01:04:33.400] did you ever demand it in writing? [01:04:33.400 --> 01:04:34.400] Did I? [01:04:34.400 --> 01:04:35.400] I asked you first. [01:04:35.400 --> 01:04:36.400] No. [01:04:36.400 --> 01:04:37.400] Why not? [01:04:37.400 --> 01:04:41.080] Demand what? [01:04:41.080 --> 01:04:42.980] The nature and cause. [01:04:42.980 --> 01:04:44.680] I did not. [01:04:44.680 --> 01:04:46.960] So why not? [01:04:46.960 --> 01:04:51.320] I didn't know I had to. [01:04:51.320 --> 01:04:55.760] Didn't you just tell me you called down here and asked them, hey, what type of offense [01:04:55.760 --> 01:05:02.400] is this? Is it criminal? Is it civil? Is it civil infraction? Didn't you say you did that? [01:05:02.400 --> 01:05:04.120] They are difficult to deal with. [01:05:04.120 --> 01:05:09.140] Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Different answer to the wrong question. [01:05:09.140 --> 01:05:11.040] Didn't you tell me you did that? [01:05:11.040 --> 01:05:12.080] I did. [01:05:12.080 --> 01:05:14.480] Then why aren't you doing it in writing? [01:05:14.480 --> 01:05:19.520] I don't know. I will not. [01:05:19.520 --> 01:05:24.040] You file a motion demanding nature and cause. [01:05:24.040 --> 01:05:26.000] Okay. [01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:28.320] Okay. [01:05:28.320 --> 01:05:34.400] You file a motion to dismiss when they fail to provide proper nature and cause, which [01:05:34.400 --> 01:05:39.000] I'm quite sure the Maryland Constitution says, and their Code of Criminal Procedure, whatever [01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:45.400] it's actually called, says you have an absolute right to demand to be notified of. [01:05:45.400 --> 01:05:47.600] Excellent. [01:05:47.600 --> 01:05:55.000] Okay. Same thing about proper, sufficient, and timely notice of the charge itself. What [01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:01.320] constitutes a proper complaint that invests the court in Maryland with jurisdiction? If [01:06:01.320 --> 01:06:06.360] it's a civil infraction, there won't be a complaint. If it's criminal, there will be [01:06:06.360 --> 01:06:07.360] a complaint. [01:06:07.360 --> 01:06:13.560] See, this is when you know that things aren't the way they're supposed to be. Civil infraction [01:06:13.560 --> 01:06:17.080] and a finding of guilty, they don't go together. [01:06:17.080 --> 01:06:18.080] Okay? [01:06:18.080 --> 01:06:19.080] Yeah. [01:06:19.080 --> 01:06:25.480] Criminal offense, finding of liability, they don't go together. [01:06:25.480 --> 01:06:27.120] Correct. [01:06:27.120 --> 01:06:32.480] Okay. So when they tell you that it's civil infraction, but here's our criminal complaint, [01:06:32.480 --> 01:06:34.480] something's wrong. [01:06:34.480 --> 01:06:35.480] Right. [01:06:35.480 --> 01:06:43.480] So if it's civil, there has to be a proper cause of action filed by the plaintiff, right? [01:06:43.480 --> 01:06:44.960] Right. [01:06:44.960 --> 01:06:47.240] Was one filed if it was civil? [01:06:47.240 --> 01:06:48.240] No. [01:06:48.240 --> 01:06:52.800] Okay. If it's criminal, a proper complaint must be filed, right? [01:06:52.800 --> 01:06:53.800] Yes. [01:06:53.800 --> 01:06:57.120] Was one filed in accordance with the laws of Maryland? [01:06:57.120 --> 01:06:58.120] No. [01:06:58.120 --> 01:07:04.600] Then why are you asking for a trial on a court that has no jurisdiction to do a damn thing? [01:07:04.600 --> 01:07:06.640] Why not? [01:07:06.640 --> 01:07:16.200] Okay. And do your stuff in writing. Stop using the telephone. Stop using letters. Do it in [01:07:16.200 --> 01:07:22.960] writing through motions to the court. Prove the court is acting prejudicially and biasly [01:07:22.960 --> 01:07:29.360] against the accused and therefore could never give them a fair and impartial trial. [01:07:29.360 --> 01:07:35.400] Were you a trial instructor at Lackland? [01:07:35.400 --> 01:07:39.880] No, but I sure PO'd my fair share of them. [01:07:39.880 --> 01:07:42.800] Sure you did. [01:07:42.800 --> 01:07:54.200] In fact, my TI in, when I went through flight 182 or 142 and yeah, somewhere in hell, it's [01:07:54.200 --> 01:07:59.640] been so long, I can't remember. But in any case, he was about five foot and nothing and [01:07:59.640 --> 01:08:03.560] I'm six, three. And every time he wanted to get mad at me, he'd have to walk up and stick [01:08:03.560 --> 01:08:07.040] his little smokey to bare brim in my chest and say, Airman Craig, if you don't bend over [01:08:07.040 --> 01:08:13.720] where I can stick my hat in your eye, I'm going to pull a 341. And then years later, [01:08:13.720 --> 01:08:20.640] I got to smoke his butt right out there on a softball field in the middle of the base. [01:08:20.640 --> 01:08:23.640] What year did you go through? [01:08:23.640 --> 01:08:26.640] We might have been there the same year. [01:08:26.640 --> 01:08:27.640] That's possible. [01:08:27.640 --> 01:08:32.280] Well, we were definitely there the same year. I don't know if I can remember what flight [01:08:32.280 --> 01:08:36.560] I was in. I had to dig out my picture and find out. [01:08:36.560 --> 01:08:42.640] Yeah, I was. Yeah, I was. I've got the picture somewhere. I just don't have it here in Austin [01:08:42.640 --> 01:08:44.640] where I'm at. But yeah. [01:08:44.640 --> 01:08:49.680] Yeah. I was washing dishes Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year's. [01:08:49.680 --> 01:08:52.920] That sounds more like Army than Air Force. You must have really ticked somebody off. [01:08:52.920 --> 01:08:55.560] Didn't you do your turn in the mess hall? [01:08:55.560 --> 01:09:01.640] No, I never had mess hall. I was a squad leader. I did guard duty and all that other good stuff [01:09:01.640 --> 01:09:04.240] in the dorms and everywhere else. [01:09:04.240 --> 01:09:12.200] Well, I was getting, actually, I was pretty good. I got in trouble later on. But that's [01:09:12.200 --> 01:09:13.200] a whole other story. [01:09:13.200 --> 01:09:18.400] Well, I may have had some things in my favor. See, I found out a week before they did it [01:09:18.400 --> 01:09:25.160] that my TI and my first sergeant were conspiring to try to kick me out. They actually had it [01:09:25.160 --> 01:09:29.520] written. I got CQ duty one day with a bunch of guys from my flight. We were down there [01:09:29.520 --> 01:09:33.320] cleaning up everything. And I got assigned the first sergeant's office for cleaning. [01:09:33.320 --> 01:09:39.400] And on his desk blotter calendar, he had my name, my flight and said failed locker inspection [01:09:39.400 --> 01:09:43.200] on a date a week from that day. [01:09:43.200 --> 01:09:47.360] So they were conspiring to try to flunk me on my locker inspection before the locker [01:09:47.360 --> 01:09:51.200] inspection ever happened. I brought a bunch of the guys that were with me down there and [01:09:51.200 --> 01:09:56.040] I showed them everything on the calendar. We went upstairs and we locked up my locker [01:09:56.040 --> 01:10:00.400] tight as could be for inspection. There was nothing for them to find. They tore my locker [01:10:00.400 --> 01:10:06.320] up like a drug dog looking for a hamburger. But there was nothing for them to get. I ticked [01:10:06.320 --> 01:10:08.760] them off so bad it wasn't even funny. [01:10:08.760 --> 01:10:15.280] Wow. And you didn't feel any repercussions from that? [01:10:15.280 --> 01:10:20.480] Oh, he tried his best the whole time. This little five foot nothing dude named Kolupka. [01:10:20.480 --> 01:10:24.080] He did his best, but I wouldn't let him get away with it. Every time he threatened me [01:10:24.080 --> 01:10:30.200] with something, I'd just stand up there a foot above him and grin. [01:10:30.200 --> 01:10:34.800] Say you do your best, but there ain't nothing you can do to me that I don't let you. [01:10:34.800 --> 01:10:40.360] It's one of those things. It's like the little dog, the little dog syndrome. [01:10:40.360 --> 01:10:41.360] Yeah, exactly. [01:10:41.360 --> 01:10:45.480] They call that the Napoleon complex. [01:10:45.480 --> 01:10:52.720] Eddie, I believe in the value for value model. Is the only way to compensate you is sending [01:10:52.720 --> 01:10:53.720] a check? [01:10:53.720 --> 01:10:58.920] No, no. You can make donations online through the rule of law website or the Logos Radio [01:10:58.920 --> 01:11:02.960] Network website. If you go to the donations page, there's a gold button under my name [01:11:02.960 --> 01:11:08.160] where it says make a donation to Eddie. You can do it there as well over the internet, [01:11:08.160 --> 01:11:12.640] credit card, whatever. But if you do send me something in the mail and it's not cash [01:11:12.640 --> 01:11:17.600] or silver, don't put a name on it. Just put in the money amount and everything, but don't [01:11:17.600 --> 01:11:18.600] put a name on it. [01:11:18.600 --> 01:11:19.600] All right. [01:11:19.600 --> 01:11:20.600] Okay. [01:11:20.600 --> 01:11:21.600] All righty then. [01:11:21.600 --> 01:11:26.200] All right. Well, I appreciate the call in and get that stuff down in writing and get [01:11:26.200 --> 01:11:31.280] it filed ASAP, but don't be asking for a trial from somebody that has no authority to conduct [01:11:31.280 --> 01:11:32.280] one. [01:11:32.280 --> 01:11:33.280] Yes, sir. [01:11:33.280 --> 01:11:34.280] All right. Good luck. [01:11:34.280 --> 01:11:35.280] Bye. [01:11:35.280 --> 01:11:36.280] Bye-bye. [01:11:36.280 --> 01:11:42.000] All right. Now we have Alex in New York. Alex, what can we do for you? [01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:44.000] Hello, sir. [01:11:44.000 --> 01:11:45.000] Howdy. [01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:52.680] So I have two questions. One is about transportation. One is about a credit card. [01:11:52.680 --> 01:11:58.520] Okay. Well, I might can help with the first one. I don't know about the second one. We'll [01:11:58.520 --> 01:11:59.520] see. [01:11:59.520 --> 01:12:08.080] So far, I have heard that I think I'm in a jam because I'm actually a commercial driver. [01:12:08.080 --> 01:12:14.080] I drive like a taxi. So I have a commercial license, commercial license plate and a commercial [01:12:14.080 --> 01:12:15.080] insurance. [01:12:15.080 --> 01:12:16.080] Right. [01:12:16.080 --> 01:12:24.000] And I have gotten 11 tickets last year. Is there anything I can do? [01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:25.000] You're in New York? [01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:30.720] Yes, New York City. [01:12:30.720 --> 01:12:34.800] Well, if you're going to get that many tickets, consider changing occupations. [01:12:34.800 --> 01:12:38.640] True, true. But... [01:12:38.640 --> 01:12:44.760] The issue here is, is what can you do? And the thing is, is can you fight the tickets? [01:12:44.760 --> 01:12:48.360] Do you know how? Do you know how to prove they're wrong, they're false, they're lies [01:12:48.360 --> 01:12:52.320] or they don't apply? See, the question is, is it right to you to these tickets when you [01:12:52.320 --> 01:12:56.680] were on duty or off duty? If they wrote them to you while you were on duty, what was the [01:12:56.680 --> 01:13:01.480] alleged offense and what is the actual statutory criteria for committing that offense? [01:13:01.480 --> 01:13:02.960] Uh-huh. [01:13:02.960 --> 01:13:08.160] Okay. And what facts can you show that makes the officer a liar in making the allegation [01:13:08.160 --> 01:13:10.320] for that offense? [01:13:10.320 --> 01:13:12.840] Okay. [01:13:12.840 --> 01:13:13.840] Do you know any of this? [01:13:13.840 --> 01:13:20.240] I get that. I have been researching. I have read pretty much all of the material on your [01:13:20.240 --> 01:13:22.720] style of law blog. [01:13:22.720 --> 01:13:27.840] Okay. But now let me ask you a question in response to that. How much of the actual New [01:13:27.840 --> 01:13:33.120] York law relating to the citations you've got, have you read? [01:13:33.120 --> 01:13:38.160] Zero. I'm just in the process of doing that. [01:13:38.160 --> 01:13:42.960] Okay. Well, you better speed that process up if you've got 11 tickets. [01:13:42.960 --> 01:13:49.760] Yes, sir. One other question I had was, I heard a lot about the fact we talk about how [01:13:49.760 --> 01:13:51.600] speed matters are not criminal. [01:13:51.600 --> 01:13:57.720] No, no, no, no, no. In some states, they're criminal. In some states, they're not. You [01:13:57.720 --> 01:14:02.520] have to figure out which one of those conditions applies where you are to the particular offense [01:14:02.520 --> 01:14:06.560] that you allegedly committed. [01:14:06.560 --> 01:14:12.280] Because some states kind of mix them up. If you go X miles per hour over the speed limit, [01:14:12.280 --> 01:14:16.600] it's civil. But once you break a certain point, it becomes criminal and so on and so forth. [01:14:16.600 --> 01:14:21.680] So it can change mid-stride on you here. So you've got to know which one applies. [01:14:21.680 --> 01:14:31.600] But once I find out if they are not criminal, does the fact that I am a commercial entity [01:14:31.600 --> 01:14:32.600] change anything? [01:14:32.600 --> 01:14:38.720] No. It still means they have to fight fair. Whether you're commercial or not, they still [01:14:38.720 --> 01:14:44.200] have to fight fair. They have to play by the rules. Your job is to understand the rules [01:14:44.200 --> 01:14:49.920] just as well or better than they do and kick them in the teeth every time they break one. [01:14:49.920 --> 01:14:54.560] Just like they're trying to say you did when you got the citation. [01:14:54.560 --> 01:15:01.360] I see. Do I have any option to fight them by mail? [01:15:01.360 --> 01:15:04.880] I don't know. What does New York allow you to do in these cases? [01:15:04.880 --> 01:15:15.360] Okay. Got it. Got it. Okay. So my next step would be basically just to familiarize myself [01:15:15.360 --> 01:15:17.120] with the laws that... [01:15:17.120 --> 01:15:25.160] No. Your next task is to live and breathe those statutes, not familiarize yourself. [01:15:25.160 --> 01:15:33.800] Familiar can mean a lot of things. Okay? But it will never mean expert. [01:15:33.800 --> 01:15:42.160] Got it. Okay. So my next task is to know the laws that directly affect a particular ticket. [01:15:42.160 --> 01:15:46.680] That particular charge and your particular occupation would be a very smart choice. [01:15:46.680 --> 01:15:50.320] Okay. What would be the next move? [01:15:50.320 --> 01:15:56.040] The next move would figure out which rules you have to understand in addition to those [01:15:56.040 --> 01:16:00.880] for the court process, whether they be the civil rules or the criminal rules or a combination [01:16:00.880 --> 01:16:04.160] of both of those rules. [01:16:04.160 --> 01:16:13.680] Okay. Is there any material that I can use from you guys that will help me better understand [01:16:13.680 --> 01:16:15.280] the process? [01:16:15.280 --> 01:16:21.880] Again, without knowing what the actual process in New York is, I can't answer that. [01:16:21.880 --> 01:16:22.880] Okay. [01:16:22.880 --> 01:16:29.360] Okay. It really depends on whether or not it's civil or it's criminal and then what [01:16:29.360 --> 01:16:35.680] the specific procedures in that state are in relation to civil or criminal. [01:16:35.680 --> 01:16:37.800] Okay. Good luck. [01:16:37.800 --> 01:16:47.000] Okay. Well, if you'll hang on, I'll answer the credit card on the other side. I've got [01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:49.200] a break here and then I'll come back. Okay? [01:16:49.200 --> 01:16:50.800] Okay. Thanks, Eddie. [01:16:50.800 --> 01:16:55.680] All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. We got a little bit of time left, so y'all [01:16:55.680 --> 01:16:56.680] hang in there. [01:16:56.680 --> 01:17:06.200] Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network [01:17:06.200 --> 01:17:10.720] on top of the on-air talents, producers and other hardworking individuals working behind [01:17:10.720 --> 01:17:11.720] the scenes? [01:17:11.720 --> 01:17:15.960] Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you. [01:17:15.960 --> 01:17:20.520] We appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year on our annual fundraisers, which [01:17:20.520 --> 01:17:23.600] help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air. [01:17:23.600 --> 01:17:28.720] Head on over to LogosRadioNetwork.com to make your contribution. Every $25 donation [01:17:28.720 --> 01:17:33.200] enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks. The first prize being [01:17:33.200 --> 01:17:36.880] a Spiked Skull Lower Receiver, second prize being a Taurus Curve. [01:17:36.880 --> 01:17:41.520] Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor. And if you donate your $25 contribution [01:17:41.520 --> 01:17:46.720] early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud. Donations by all major [01:17:46.720 --> 01:17:50.360] credit cards are accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin. [01:17:50.360 --> 01:17:55.280] The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser. Head on over to LogosRadioNetwork.com for more information [01:17:55.280 --> 01:17:58.600] and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air. [01:17:58.600 --> 01:18:05.200] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [01:18:05.200 --> 01:18:09.760] of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time [01:18:09.760 --> 01:18:16.000] we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment [01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:21.720] is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and [01:18:21.720 --> 01:18:27.840] mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests [01:18:27.840 --> 01:18:32.800] to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust young [01:18:32.800 --> 01:18:39.280] Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many [01:18:39.280 --> 01:18:45.960] others. When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [01:18:45.960 --> 01:18:51.680] quality radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:51.680 --> 01:18:57.200] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [01:18:57.200 --> 01:19:00.200] increase your income. Order now. [01:19:00.200 --> 01:19:17.200] This is the Logos Radio Network. [01:19:17.200 --> 01:19:41.720] All right, folks, we are back and we're still talking with Alex in New York. All right, [01:19:41.720 --> 01:19:47.520] Alex, what can we do for you? Let's get back on that credit card question. [01:19:47.520 --> 01:19:52.720] The second issue has to do with my girlfriend. She's on the line with- [01:19:52.720 --> 01:19:56.520] You didn't get her with a credit card, did you? [01:19:56.520 --> 01:20:06.640] No. So what happened was she was with another person and this guy took out $45,000 on her [01:20:06.640 --> 01:20:14.520] credit card and they went through a messy divorce, but she ended up owning the credit [01:20:14.520 --> 01:20:20.000] card, so she's stuck with it right now. So she's trying to see if there's any way she [01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:25.200] can fight back, dismiss it or what have you. [01:20:25.200 --> 01:20:29.640] Well, how did she manage to allow herself to wind up with the credit card debt if it [01:20:29.640 --> 01:20:33.080] was his? [01:20:33.080 --> 01:20:38.640] It was her credit card, she had- Okay, not my point. I fully understand it's [01:20:38.640 --> 01:20:43.680] her credit card, but he took out the money on it, allegedly, right? [01:20:43.680 --> 01:20:52.440] Yeah, because he was an authorized user. Okay. Then the question there becomes, in the divorce, [01:20:52.440 --> 01:20:55.280] why did she accept the debt on the card? [01:20:55.280 --> 01:21:00.800] That's a long story. Okay. But the problem is it's a long story [01:21:00.800 --> 01:21:03.400] that she agreed to, right? [01:21:03.400 --> 01:21:05.800] Yes, yes, she did. Okay. [01:21:05.800 --> 01:21:08.640] She technically owns it, it's her debt. [01:21:08.640 --> 01:21:16.320] Yeah, there ain't no technically to it. If she agreed to accept the debt on the card [01:21:16.320 --> 01:21:22.160] in the divorce, it's hers. There ain't no technical anymore. It was only technical and [01:21:22.160 --> 01:21:27.040] if it was disputed and he was the one that did it and she didn't, then it's not technical [01:21:27.040 --> 01:21:28.040] anymore. [01:21:28.040 --> 01:21:36.840] I agree. But I heard on some of the other shows, the guys talk about how people fought [01:21:36.840 --> 01:21:38.840] them and- [01:21:38.840 --> 01:21:44.440] Well, the question here is one, fought them based upon their attempt to collect it through [01:21:44.440 --> 01:21:50.440] unlawful means. That's one thing, okay? That's what these people are fighting, a debt that [01:21:50.440 --> 01:21:58.480] pops up out of nowhere, or that the debt collector did not follow proper legal procedure to attempt [01:21:58.480 --> 01:22:04.120] to collect in compliance with federal law. That's what these people are talking about, [01:22:04.120 --> 01:22:05.120] fighting. [01:22:05.120 --> 01:22:09.400] And the ones that are talking about just getting out of paying what you assumed as a rightful [01:22:09.400 --> 01:22:15.000] debt, well, those are crooks. Those are con men, okay? [01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:17.520] Yeah, yeah. [01:22:17.520 --> 01:22:23.640] So the thing about it is, while she might be able to do it if someone made an illegal [01:22:23.640 --> 01:22:29.320] attempt to collect the debt and she challenged them on it and took them to court and won, [01:22:29.320 --> 01:22:32.480] she might actually get more out of them than they could get out of her and thus cancel [01:22:32.480 --> 01:22:42.680] it all out. But she assumed the debt willingly in the divorce, it's hers. [01:22:42.680 --> 01:22:50.520] So if she stops paying it, that's her prerogative. But it can lawfully affect her credit score [01:22:50.520 --> 01:22:56.880] as long as the debt collector and the reporting agency complies with federal law in doing [01:22:56.880 --> 01:23:07.280] so. It's when they do not, that she will then have something to go after them for, okay? [01:23:07.280 --> 01:23:13.160] The three things you need to be aware of in federal law is the FDCPA, the Fair Debt Collection [01:23:13.160 --> 01:23:20.920] Practices Act, the Fair Debt Credit Reporting Act, and the Federal Telephony Act. [01:23:20.920 --> 01:23:28.720] Those three acts spell out how a debt collector must operate their business. And failure to [01:23:28.720 --> 01:23:35.100] comply with that law results in punitive monetary penalties that the person they are attempting [01:23:35.100 --> 01:23:44.160] to collect from has every right to sue and receive, provided they also do what needs [01:23:44.160 --> 01:23:51.920] to be done to be able to prove up that the debt collection company violated the rules. [01:23:51.920 --> 01:23:58.120] So if she stops paying and the collection calls and letters start coming, she needs [01:23:58.120 --> 01:24:03.680] to know what the FDCPA says about how they can communicate and what they must communicate, [01:24:03.680 --> 01:24:08.640] when they communicate, everything they must say and everything they must do. And every [01:24:08.640 --> 01:24:12.880] time they don't do it, she keeps a log of that. Every time they do it incorrectly, she [01:24:12.880 --> 01:24:18.320] keeps a log of that. When she gets several violations worth a few thousand dollars or [01:24:18.320 --> 01:24:23.320] more, she can file suit, and then she can turn around and start negotiating with them [01:24:23.320 --> 01:24:28.440] over the alleged credit card debt versus the alleged collection of that debt and how much [01:24:28.440 --> 01:24:30.440] they now owe her. [01:24:30.440 --> 01:24:41.160] Okay, she has stopped paying and they're attempting to serve her right now, right? Yeah, they're [01:24:41.160 --> 01:24:44.040] trying to take her to court right now. [01:24:44.040 --> 01:24:47.360] Okay, which they're allowed to do. [01:24:47.360 --> 01:24:56.040] Yes. She was the strategy of avoiding the service for what? [01:24:56.040 --> 01:25:01.760] Well, okay, here's the problem. You're in New York, right? Yeah. And she's in New York, [01:25:01.760 --> 01:25:02.760] right? [01:25:02.760 --> 01:25:06.320] She's right. Yeah, she's listening on the line. [01:25:06.320 --> 01:25:10.600] Right. And the service is attempting to be performed in New York, right? [01:25:10.600 --> 01:25:11.920] Correct. [01:25:11.920 --> 01:25:17.680] Does New York make it a crime to avoid lawful process, service of process? [01:25:17.680 --> 01:25:19.680] No. [01:25:19.680 --> 01:25:22.480] You're positive or are you just giving me an answer? [01:25:22.480 --> 01:25:26.200] Are you positive? Yeah, she's positive. [01:25:26.200 --> 01:25:30.960] Okay. If it's not a crime to avoid process, then you can play dodgeball for as long as [01:25:30.960 --> 01:25:34.160] it works. Eventually though, you're going to get tired. [01:25:34.160 --> 01:25:44.520] Okay. Well, we're going to move to LA in a few months, so that is going to complicate [01:25:44.520 --> 01:25:46.520] things further. [01:25:46.520 --> 01:25:49.920] Maybe it will, maybe it won't. There's nothing to stop them from paying a process server [01:25:49.920 --> 01:25:53.280] in California to do the exact same thing, and then haul her all the way back to New [01:25:53.280 --> 01:25:56.600] York to go to court or lose. [01:25:56.600 --> 01:25:58.960] True, true. [01:25:58.960 --> 01:26:04.280] So you're looking at potentially increasing your costs exponentially here, not only by [01:26:04.280 --> 01:26:08.960] not paying the card, but now having to continuously travel back and forth to New York for court [01:26:08.960 --> 01:26:09.960] appearances. [01:26:09.960 --> 01:26:17.720] Yes, that is true. We're not moving to avoid this, we're just moving because we have to [01:26:17.720 --> 01:26:18.720] know. [01:26:18.720 --> 01:26:22.720] Well, I wasn't assuming either way on that. I'm just saying that that's part of the problem [01:26:22.720 --> 01:26:25.520] you're going to run into. [01:26:25.520 --> 01:26:29.720] So you have to weigh your options here. If you go to court with them, are you likely [01:26:29.720 --> 01:26:32.840] to win or are you more likely to lose? [01:26:32.840 --> 01:26:37.520] If you're more likely to lose and you know that you properly owed it to begin with, if [01:26:37.520 --> 01:26:44.040] they'll negotiate down to a portion of what you owe or lay off any penalties for late [01:26:44.040 --> 01:26:48.000] fees and all that other kind of stuff, if you'll take back up the payments, that's something [01:26:48.000 --> 01:26:53.760] you can negotiate. Any of that's possible. You just have to talk to them to find out. [01:26:53.760 --> 01:27:00.280] But eventually they're going to get you served. And then the day you don't show up for court, [01:27:00.280 --> 01:27:01.960] they win. [01:27:01.960 --> 01:27:08.320] Okay. What happens if they don't serve and they start... [01:27:08.320 --> 01:27:13.400] It all depends upon what the law of New York says about that. If a debt collector can prove [01:27:13.400 --> 01:27:19.400] that they have attempted proper service numerous times, for instance, if the law says this [01:27:19.400 --> 01:27:25.400] is how they can operate, if they say, let's say if the debt collector attempts to process [01:27:25.400 --> 01:27:30.280] the service on three different occasions in three places where the individual is known [01:27:30.280 --> 01:27:36.840] to have lived, worked, or last been known to reside, then the debt collector may proceed [01:27:36.840 --> 01:27:40.800] with the suit even in the absence of the defendant. [01:27:40.800 --> 01:27:44.800] The law could very well be written that way. I don't know. You need to find out. [01:27:44.800 --> 01:27:50.120] Yes, definitely. Okay. Thanks, Eddie. [01:27:50.120 --> 01:27:51.120] You're welcome. [01:27:51.120 --> 01:27:52.120] Thanks for the clarity. [01:27:52.120 --> 01:27:57.560] Yes, sir. Y'all have a good night and good luck. [01:27:57.560 --> 01:27:58.560] Thank you, sir. [01:27:58.560 --> 01:27:59.560] All right. Bye-bye. [01:27:59.560 --> 01:28:06.800] Okay. Now we are going to go to Oliver in Tennessee. Oliver, what can we do for you? [01:28:06.800 --> 01:28:08.400] How you doing, Eddie? [01:28:08.400 --> 01:28:11.800] I'm doing all right so far. Let's see here how you're doing. [01:28:11.800 --> 01:28:18.640] I'm doing pretty good. All I've been taking a hit about on file with the city, file a claim [01:28:18.640 --> 01:28:19.640] against the city insurance. [01:28:19.640 --> 01:28:20.640] Yeah. [01:28:20.640 --> 01:28:26.200] It was pretty easy than I thought. I called City Hall, called around, they sent me to the [01:28:26.200 --> 01:28:30.840] Human Resources, and I talked to the guy. He was an attorney. He didn't file a suit, [01:28:30.840 --> 01:28:32.840] and I'm waiting to hear a response. [01:28:32.840 --> 01:28:34.840] Well, you didn't file a suit. You filed a claim. [01:28:34.840 --> 01:28:39.120] I'm going to file a claim. I'm waiting to hear a response back now. [01:28:39.120 --> 01:28:40.120] Okay. Well. [01:28:40.120 --> 01:28:42.440] He seemed real interested in it. [01:28:42.440 --> 01:28:48.280] Yeah, but here's the way that works. Just so you're aware, I'm hoping it doesn't, but [01:28:48.280 --> 01:28:56.840] in case it does, pay attention to the following. They're going to first make it appear hopeful [01:28:56.840 --> 01:29:03.000] that you're going to win your claim. Then they're going to say, oh, we've encountered [01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:07.880] new information that alters the fact pattern and thus makes it appear that everything was [01:29:07.880 --> 01:29:08.880] done properly. [01:29:08.880 --> 01:29:15.560] So we're going to deny your claim. Okay. And I'm just telling you this because if and when [01:29:15.560 --> 01:29:21.480] that happens, which it usually does, not always, but usually you're not so surprised and angry [01:29:21.480 --> 01:29:26.000] about it because it's very likely to happen. They hate to pay. And they know for a fact [01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:33.000] that most people cannot afford the trip to court to make them pay. Okay. Or even know [01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:38.120] the proper way to take them to court to make them pay. So just expect that, be ready for [01:29:38.120 --> 01:29:43.480] that and get your lawsuit written up, regardless of what they tell you. Have it on standby [01:29:43.480 --> 01:29:44.760] and ready to go. [01:29:44.760 --> 01:29:47.040] Right. I'm writing it up now. [01:29:47.040 --> 01:29:51.480] Okay. Hang on just a second. We'll let you finish up on this on the other side. All right, [01:29:51.480 --> 01:29:56.040] folks, rule of law radio, half an hour to go. So y'all hang in there and we'll be right [01:29:56.040 --> 01:29:59.040] back with your host, Eddie Craig. [01:29:59.040 --> 01:30:07.040] Did you know the majority of businesses in the U.S. are family owned? We're not just [01:30:07.040 --> 01:30:11.680] talking mom and pop stores, but companies at the very top of the corporate ladder. I'm [01:30:11.680 --> 01:30:16.520] Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the top family businesses next. [01:30:16.520 --> 01:30:21.040] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back [01:30:21.040 --> 01:30:26.840] again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:26.840 --> 01:30:33.080] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, [01:30:33.080 --> 01:30:38.160] it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private [01:30:38.160 --> 01:30:45.600] search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage. [01:30:45.600 --> 01:30:50.520] When it comes to business, blood and money really do mix. A whopping 8 out of 10 American [01:30:50.520 --> 01:30:55.480] businesses are family owned. They contribute nearly 60 percent of the nation's economy [01:30:55.480 --> 01:31:01.360] and employ nearly two-thirds of the U.S. workforce. Many of the firms in the S&P 500 are family [01:31:01.360 --> 01:31:06.080] controlled and they're doing great. They're more stable and they inspire more commitment [01:31:06.080 --> 01:31:08.120] and trust in their employees. [01:31:08.120 --> 01:31:14.880] The biggest family owned business is, surprise, Walmart. Next comes Ford, Cargill, Coke Industries, [01:31:14.880 --> 01:31:20.120] Carlson Companies, Comcast and News Corp. Rounding out the top 10 is the sweetest of [01:31:20.120 --> 01:31:26.000] them all, Mars. M&M's anyone? I've got your Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the [01:31:26.000 --> 01:31:31.680] world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.680 --> 01:31:37.040] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [01:31:37.040 --> 01:31:42.480] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded [01:31:42.480 --> 01:31:46.400] it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their [01:31:46.400 --> 01:31:50.960] lives and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.960 --> 01:31:54.120] I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force [01:31:54.120 --> 01:31:59.160] pilot. I'm the father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to [01:31:59.160 --> 01:32:01.200] RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:01.200 --> 01:32:05.280] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or [01:32:05.280 --> 01:32:09.080] wind damage from the recent storms? Come on, we all know the government caused it with [01:32:09.080 --> 01:32:13.080] their chem trails, but good luck getting them to pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about [01:32:13.080 --> 01:32:17.080] the chem trails, but I'm serious about your roof. That's why you have insurance and Hill [01:32:17.080 --> 01:32:21.920] Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense [01:32:21.920 --> 01:32:26.320] and we accept Bitcoin. As a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with [01:32:26.320 --> 01:32:30.920] zero complaints, you can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and [01:32:30.920 --> 01:32:39.320] your roof right the first time. Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com, [01:32:39.320 --> 01:32:44.120] mention the crypto show and get $100 off and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio [01:32:44.120 --> 01:32:49.200] Network to help continue this programming. So if those out of town roofers come knocking, [01:32:49.200 --> 01:32:57.920] your door should be locking. That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts [01:32:57.920 --> 01:33:04.800] are based on full roof replacement. May not actually be kidding about chem trails. [01:33:04.800 --> 01:33:11.800] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:34.800 --> 01:33:57.120] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio and we are talking to Oliver [01:33:57.120 --> 01:33:59.600] in Tennessee. All right, Oliver, please continue. [01:33:59.600 --> 01:34:05.200] Actually, I was waiting for you to finish. You were telling me about what to expect. [01:34:05.200 --> 01:34:10.640] Yeah. You said you had your lawsuit written up on right now, right? So that's good. Just [01:34:10.640 --> 01:34:14.640] be prepared for this because what's going to happen is if they do deny it, you're going [01:34:14.640 --> 01:34:19.960] to have to then turn around and say, that's fine. You denied it. Now, exhausted administrative [01:34:19.960 --> 01:34:24.520] process. Here we go. And you can then go ahead and file a suit and you're on your way. [01:34:24.520 --> 01:34:32.480] Okay. Going through the suit, I've been remembering everything I've been hearing from you since [01:34:32.480 --> 01:34:37.800] I've been listening to you. And going through the suit, I go through all these cases and [01:34:37.800 --> 01:34:45.160] listen to the briefs and understand why people are not getting the point across and why they [01:34:45.160 --> 01:34:54.000] get remanded or don't, they lose their case. So I was going back through the codes, the [01:34:54.000 --> 01:35:01.320] statutes of my things off and I started finding things. I'm not going to spoil everything [01:35:01.320 --> 01:35:05.400] now because I want everybody else to get a chance, but I found this one that is very [01:35:05.400 --> 01:35:12.040] interesting in the TTA, it's a motor and other vehicles, the transportation section. [01:35:12.040 --> 01:35:13.040] Right. [01:35:13.040 --> 01:35:18.080] And in the definitions, I'm amazed. I just started with the definition, reading all the [01:35:18.080 --> 01:35:26.000] definitions and I found something called special mobile vehicle, I mean, special mobile equipment. [01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:34.120] The definition is special mobile equipment means every vehicle not designed, used primarily [01:35:34.120 --> 01:35:43.360] for the transportation of persons or property and only incidentally operated or moved over [01:35:43.360 --> 01:35:51.440] a highway or street, including, but not limited to ditches, apparatus and road construction [01:35:51.440 --> 01:36:02.040] and maintenance machinery, such as as spreaders, ammunition mixers, bucket loaders, basically [01:36:02.040 --> 01:36:05.080] everything that don't carry goods in person. [01:36:05.080 --> 01:36:10.080] Well, no, no, no. The description of everything you're given is something more like a farm [01:36:10.080 --> 01:36:16.920] tractor or a piece of road equipment or that type of deal. All right. Remember what is [01:36:16.920 --> 01:36:25.800] the, what was the very first part of that definition, not designed to, okay. Normally, [01:36:25.800 --> 01:36:30.880] every one of these things you're talking about can only hold one person at a time period [01:36:30.880 --> 01:36:31.880] and no others [01:36:31.880 --> 01:36:45.480] Okay. And they move, they don't, aren't primarily for moving upon the highway. You can't say [01:36:45.480 --> 01:36:49.640] that about your car. You can only say that about these particular types of equipment. [01:36:49.640 --> 01:36:53.720] You don't see them going down the highway on a regular basis as a daily car, do you? [01:36:53.720 --> 01:37:04.000] Okay. So don't read into something that's what's not there and don't omit something [01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:14.480] that is. It's the same thing like these morons that call their car a road machine. They've [01:37:14.480 --> 01:37:20.040] obviously never bothered to look up the definition of a road machine. A road machine is actually [01:37:20.040 --> 01:37:27.120] a specific type of machine that was designed to both grind up, melt down and relay asphalt [01:37:27.120 --> 01:37:29.560] on a road that's being built. [01:37:29.560 --> 01:37:38.400] Okay. So is a safe way to go about saying your car is personal property? [01:37:38.400 --> 01:37:44.120] That's one way to go about it. Yeah. It is personal property. The courts have tried to [01:37:44.120 --> 01:37:50.320] say that there is no property interest in a vehicle used upon the highway. That what [01:37:50.320 --> 01:37:56.720] they're not drawing the distinction between is a vehicle as in commerce, there's no property [01:37:56.720 --> 01:38:03.360] interest because of the way it's using the road. But that's not true of a private individual [01:38:03.360 --> 01:38:11.220] who isn't engaging in that type of use of the road. There is a property interest there. [01:38:11.220 --> 01:38:15.240] The courts know this, but they always try to find a way to go back to the commercial [01:38:15.240 --> 01:38:20.880] aspect of the terminology rather than the non-commercial. And most people oblige them [01:38:20.880 --> 01:38:27.040] by making a mistake of association at some point in the proceeding. [01:38:27.040 --> 01:38:31.560] They either refer to their own car as a vehicle, they refer to their own activity as driving [01:38:31.560 --> 01:38:35.840] or they produced one of the accouterments at the traffic stop or they go directly to the [01:38:35.840 --> 01:38:41.600] subject matter during trial. Any one of those things puts you within that box where you [01:38:41.600 --> 01:38:47.920] don't want to be. And that's what gives the court the out it needs to write the case law [01:38:47.920 --> 01:39:01.040] that it does. Okay. So there's no safe outlet from the vehicle? No. Vehicle is one of their [01:39:01.040 --> 01:39:11.360] terms. What's the term we use? Car. Car. Automobile. You can use automobile, you can use car unless [01:39:11.360 --> 01:39:18.080] the statute specifically defines automobile, does it? No. If you will look, you will find [01:39:18.080 --> 01:39:31.760] that the definition of vehicle almost always says a device used or designed for. Okay. [01:39:31.760 --> 01:39:40.360] Okay. All right. So just expect that, be prepared for it and go get them. How about if they [01:39:40.360 --> 01:39:46.880] do cash out? If they do say, okay, we're settling, but we only see this much damage. Well, that's [01:39:46.880 --> 01:39:50.640] up to you whether or not you wish to accept it. Nothing says you have to accept what they [01:39:50.640 --> 01:40:00.240] offer. You can either try to negotiate with them or turn them down and let them try to [01:40:00.240 --> 01:40:14.000] negotiate with you. Okay. All right. All right. Bye bye. Now we're going to go to Charles [01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:27.080] in Washington. Charles, what can we do for you? Hello, Charles. All right. Charles is [01:40:27.080 --> 01:40:31.480] not available at the moment it would appear. So let's move to the next one in line. Steve [01:40:31.480 --> 01:40:39.960] in Florida. Steve, what can we do for you? Hello, Steve. Hi, Eddie. Hi. Yes. Hello, Eddie. [01:40:39.960 --> 01:40:45.800] Hi, this is Steven, California. I had the criminal case in Florida. Okay. I'm currently [01:40:45.800 --> 01:40:54.080] transcribing the 911 calls into the appropriate form, i.e. notarized and sworn. I have a question [01:40:54.080 --> 01:41:01.280] regarding these, what appears to be edits in the 911 audio. For instance, I read in [01:41:01.280 --> 01:41:10.400] the Florida statute that these might be to cover the caller's name and identifying information [01:41:10.400 --> 01:41:15.040] address type of thing. Does the context of the speech before and after give you that [01:41:15.040 --> 01:41:22.240] impression about these edits? One of them does, but not all five. Okay. The other five [01:41:22.240 --> 01:41:28.160] make me think that things were edited out in order to transform the audio into what [01:41:28.160 --> 01:41:32.720] I believe is taking place here. Okay. Then what you may have to do is file discovery [01:41:32.720 --> 01:41:40.080] for an unredacted version, unedited, unredacted. Okay. But to the point, during this transcription [01:41:40.080 --> 01:41:45.720] that I'm doing, how should I notate something? I put in dash dash question mark edited out [01:41:45.720 --> 01:41:50.760] question mark dash dash. Should I put something else and have it notarized? Whatever you need [01:41:50.760 --> 01:41:55.920] to let you know that something's not right there, how you annotate that to yourself. [01:41:55.920 --> 01:42:01.080] These are not official transcripts, so to speak. They're just... You can put edited [01:42:01.080 --> 01:42:09.280] question mark, whatever. You can put edit dash missing information question mark. [01:42:09.280 --> 01:42:16.640] Yes, sir. What's absolutely interesting to me is I now have reason to believe in my mind [01:42:16.640 --> 01:42:22.880] that I'm listening to edits out, which actually make me believe that this is not the nosy [01:42:22.880 --> 01:42:28.440] lady that I said mind your own business to, but someone that she and her husband asked [01:42:28.440 --> 01:42:32.800] to make the call for them, and that this person did not see anything, but they did have eyes [01:42:32.800 --> 01:42:36.400] on us from the time that they test her with watching us. [01:42:36.400 --> 01:42:41.360] Okay. Well, unless you have information about the idea of the person on the phone, you can't [01:42:41.360 --> 01:42:45.280] show that one way or the other. Your presumption is not admissible. [01:42:45.280 --> 01:42:51.120] Okay. Will discovery... So is it true that... Am I thinking correctly that my attorneys [01:42:51.120 --> 01:42:55.800] will have her information, but I'm not privy to that name of that... [01:42:55.800 --> 01:43:00.120] That's not necessarily true. The person that made the call may not be the person that's [01:43:00.120 --> 01:43:06.920] the witness. So I don't know if your attorney will get their information or not, or even [01:43:06.920 --> 01:43:12.040] consider it relevant. Right. There's a few things in here they might [01:43:12.040 --> 01:43:15.200] not consider it relevant, but I think it might very well be. [01:43:15.200 --> 01:43:20.760] Well, without the information that appears to be missing, if any is missing, you don't [01:43:20.760 --> 01:43:25.480] really know that for sure. So you need to get an unredacted, unedited version. [01:43:25.480 --> 01:43:34.200] Okay. Thank you. Now, if my attorneys told me that two charges were dropped, the domestic [01:43:34.200 --> 01:43:39.920] violence and the failures to show ID, how do I get proof of that it's been dropped? [01:43:39.920 --> 01:43:42.120] And can they... Because there'll be an order for it. Tell [01:43:42.120 --> 01:43:46.880] them you want the judicial order or the prosecutorial dismissal of those charges. [01:43:46.880 --> 01:43:49.920] Okay. All right. Hang on just a second, Steve. I [01:43:49.920 --> 01:43:54.400] got a break coming up here. All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. We got one more [01:43:54.400 --> 01:44:00.400] segment. Y'all hang in there. We'll be right back. [01:44:00.400 --> 01:44:04.040] You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics? [01:44:04.040 --> 01:44:06.640] Boring! Are you confused by words like the Constitution [01:44:06.640 --> 01:44:08.320] or the Federal Reserve? What? [01:44:08.320 --> 01:44:12.640] If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity. [01:44:12.640 --> 01:44:18.080] Hi, my name is Steve Holt. And like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity [01:44:18.080 --> 01:44:22.800] at an early age. I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost [01:44:22.800 --> 01:44:28.200] every home in America, the television. Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching [01:44:28.200 --> 01:44:32.760] stupidity. But there is hope. The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands [01:44:32.760 --> 01:44:37.240] of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover. And because of Brave New [01:44:37.240 --> 01:44:42.840] Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested. [01:44:42.840 --> 01:44:50.720] So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 [01:44:50.720 --> 01:44:54.800] or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com. [01:44:54.800 --> 01:44:58.160] Side effects when using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary [01:44:58.160 --> 01:45:04.560] and an overall increase in mental functioning. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.560 --> 01:45:10.120] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, [01:45:10.120 --> 01:45:17.320] or CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, [01:45:17.320 --> 01:45:21.760] know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should [01:45:21.760 --> 01:45:28.240] do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.240 --> 01:45:35.000] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:39.640] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the [01:45:39.640 --> 01:45:44.760] principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio [01:45:44.760 --> 01:45:51.720] classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much [01:45:51.720 --> 01:46:14.720] more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:14.720 --> 01:46:44.680] All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking [01:46:44.680 --> 01:46:48.000] to Charles in Washington. All right, Charles, please continue. [01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:51.320] Okay. I'm here. Can you hear me, Eddie? [01:46:51.320 --> 01:46:52.320] Yeah. [01:46:52.320 --> 01:46:53.320] Eddie? [01:46:53.320 --> 01:46:54.320] Yeah. [01:46:54.320 --> 01:46:55.320] Can you hear me now? [01:46:55.320 --> 01:46:56.320] I can hear you. [01:46:56.320 --> 01:46:59.320] I was on the phone, so somebody's there to talk about call. I get blocked. Okay, anyway, [01:46:59.320 --> 01:47:03.040] I've still been receiving information from you, and I've been looking at my email address [01:47:03.040 --> 01:47:08.520] book on that, taking an e-mail stuff. And then the last time I was on the phone with [01:47:08.520 --> 01:47:13.640] you on the radio, you mentioned to a gentleman by having a Mercedes, but he didn't have a [01:47:13.640 --> 01:47:18.040] camera. And the camera I've been looking for is the one that you sent. It's just taking [01:47:18.040 --> 01:47:22.400] photographs where it can be also transmitted back to the home base, laptop. [01:47:22.400 --> 01:47:28.200] Well, you want one that can be live streamed back. And just FYI, Steve, I know I was talking [01:47:28.200 --> 01:47:31.840] to you before, but I decided to check on Charles when we got back just in case. So Steve, hang [01:47:31.840 --> 01:47:34.480] on. I'm not done with you yet. All right, go ahead, Charles. [01:47:34.480 --> 01:47:35.480] Do you want to go back to them, please? [01:47:35.480 --> 01:47:38.720] No, no, no. Go ahead. Go ahead. I just want to make sure you were there. [01:47:38.720 --> 01:47:39.720] Okay. [01:47:39.720 --> 01:47:44.400] Yeah, okay. Yeah, because I was here. And so I was calling because I was trying to get [01:47:44.400 --> 01:47:51.880] the class that was the $250 that I think I got at radiolaw.com and the jurisdiction [01:47:51.880 --> 01:47:58.520] that I got. And then I was trying to make sure I wanted to put some money for the support. [01:47:58.520 --> 01:48:02.720] And my friend who does was the former shoot out of town. So I was trying to call to get [01:48:02.720 --> 01:48:04.720] that information again, too. [01:48:04.720 --> 01:48:09.520] Get which information, Charles? [01:48:09.520 --> 01:48:13.960] The information. Oh, the information we talked about before was when I came out of my car [01:48:13.960 --> 01:48:18.280] and I was trying to register my vehicles, he was going to send it to me. You had to [01:48:18.280 --> 01:48:20.000] look it up. It was... [01:48:20.000 --> 01:48:21.600] You're talking about the Washington stuff? [01:48:21.600 --> 01:48:22.600] Yeah. [01:48:22.600 --> 01:48:23.600] Yeah. [01:48:23.600 --> 01:48:28.240] Yeah, I haven't seen the email from you. I looked for the email the night that I last [01:48:28.240 --> 01:48:33.440] talked to you, but I haven't seen an email come up. So what? I don't know. What name [01:48:33.440 --> 01:48:35.000] are you using on the email? [01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:40.720] It was Charles White or Nikki Hodge, but it should have been Charles White. [01:48:40.720 --> 01:48:42.800] Yeah. I don't have a... [01:48:42.800 --> 01:48:49.600] Give me your email to get out and make sure I'm sending it to the right one. [01:48:49.600 --> 01:48:52.600] Eddie, E-D-D-I-E at ruleoflawradio.com. [01:48:52.600 --> 01:48:58.000] And that's what I get. That's what I get. That's why I sent it to you. [01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:02.280] Yeah. I've got a Charles Shoemate and I've got a Charles Weidman, but I don't have a [01:49:02.280 --> 01:49:05.200] Charles White in my email anywhere. [01:49:05.200 --> 01:49:12.160] Okay. I'll try to send it again. So on this camera, where do I purchase that particular [01:49:12.160 --> 01:49:14.160] camera? I thought you mentioned to the guy... [01:49:14.160 --> 01:49:18.240] Well, the camera I talked about putting in for a friend of mine was a GoPro. You can [01:49:18.240 --> 01:49:21.760] get it at Walmart. You can get it at Best Buy. You can get it online. You can get it [01:49:21.760 --> 01:49:23.880] pretty much anywhere. It's a sports camera. [01:49:23.880 --> 01:49:29.960] Sports camera. Okay. And at Walmart, they have like 200 something bucks. [01:49:29.960 --> 01:49:34.080] No, no, no, no. They're not 200 something bucks. The ones that would depend upon which [01:49:34.080 --> 01:49:39.080] one you get, they're anywhere from three to 400 bucks, but they do the job and then some. [01:49:39.080 --> 01:49:45.280] Okay. And that's what I want. I don't care about that. So, okay, I got that. I had a [01:49:45.280 --> 01:49:50.960] case going on with... When I first started calling about me backing out, it was called [01:49:50.960 --> 01:49:55.800] improper backing. And I back it to a gentleman where the person never came to court. The [01:49:55.800 --> 01:50:01.520] officers never came to court all the times that I went. And at the trial hearing, the [01:50:01.520 --> 01:50:06.640] judge insisted on having a gentleman to have another continuous. The officer, because they [01:50:06.640 --> 01:50:13.240] had a special gun training he had to be at, but the lawyer never sent me anything to... [01:50:13.240 --> 01:50:18.040] They called it something. I never received that. Neither did the court receive it. So... [01:50:18.040 --> 01:50:19.040] A continuous. [01:50:19.040 --> 01:50:26.040] So I went to... Yes, this was the third time I already went where the officer never showed [01:50:26.040 --> 01:50:28.040] up. So the judge twisted it and made it sound like, oh, when I asked for a continuous, because [01:50:28.040 --> 01:50:32.040] I went there sick, that because of that, he was going to give the officer another chance. [01:50:32.040 --> 01:50:37.040] And so I made an emotional dismissal as well as to suppress the officer's statements. And [01:50:37.040 --> 01:50:42.040] due to the fact that the witness that they were going to use was supposed to be the gentleman [01:50:42.040 --> 01:50:47.040] I hit, would never show up and he wasn't going to show up. So I couldn't make it on the court [01:50:47.040 --> 01:50:51.040] day, which was on the 23rd of May, and I was out of town with my brother-in-law who was [01:50:51.040 --> 01:50:59.040] sick. So I got to think that my life would be suspended unless I respond to two types [01:50:59.040 --> 01:51:05.040] of reasoning why it shouldn't be. And the bottom one I can meet, but I don't have evidence [01:51:05.040 --> 01:51:10.040] to that. And so I was wondering how much time do I have to respond? Well... [01:51:10.040 --> 01:51:13.040] Well, what amount of time did that notice give you? [01:51:13.040 --> 01:51:21.040] It gave me 15 days from the time they sent it. And it used to be that you have to get [01:51:21.040 --> 01:51:25.040] it, but they don't care. They got something to show that they sent it. I don't have much [01:51:25.040 --> 01:51:29.040] time to get it, whether you get it or not, send it back. So I was supposed to do it today [01:51:29.040 --> 01:51:34.040] because the day is the 29th. I'm going to do it tomorrow in hopes of that. And so when [01:51:34.040 --> 01:51:38.040] I respond to that, then I have a right to go back and... [01:51:38.040 --> 01:51:44.040] Okay. Well, you need to get the case dismissed for failure to prosecute. Okay? That's what [01:51:44.040 --> 01:51:50.040] you need to do. File a motion to dismiss, failure to prosecute. No evidence, no witness, [01:51:50.040 --> 01:51:53.040] no case. Okay? [01:51:53.040 --> 01:51:54.040] Okay. Okay. [01:51:54.040 --> 01:51:55.040] All right. [01:51:55.040 --> 01:51:56.040] I got that. [01:51:56.040 --> 01:52:03.040] And at the same time, you need to move the court in that motion to notify whatever agency [01:52:03.040 --> 01:52:09.040] sent you that notice that they are not to suspend and or if they have suspended to fully [01:52:09.040 --> 01:52:13.040] reinstate your license at no cost to you. [01:52:13.040 --> 01:52:19.040] Not to suspend. Okay. All right. Suspend. I got that. [01:52:19.040 --> 01:52:24.040] All right. So that was one, two, three pocket tickets. And one last thing, because I don't [01:52:24.040 --> 01:52:27.040] want you to get back to that gentleman too. I'm always trying to be courteous as well, [01:52:27.040 --> 01:52:31.040] but I had like five questions. When I get these pocket tickets, I heard someone say [01:52:31.040 --> 01:52:36.040] that I can write my signature at an angle. And I don't know if that's the proper way [01:52:36.040 --> 01:52:38.040] to do it. And am I supposed to put... [01:52:38.040 --> 01:52:43.040] Yeah. And if you wear a rubber underwear, three sizes too small, you can be the new [01:52:43.040 --> 01:52:44.040] Bee Gees. [01:52:44.040 --> 01:52:52.040] Okay. So what am I supposed to do? I get two tickets. Because I was told this years ago [01:52:52.040 --> 01:52:53.040] and I didn't... [01:52:53.040 --> 01:52:57.040] No. That's patronut moronism is what that is. [01:52:57.040 --> 01:53:04.040] Okay. Okay. Thank you. So is there any way to protest that those tickets... [01:53:04.040 --> 01:53:09.040] Well, I don't know. What is the specific scheme they're using to write parking tickets? [01:53:09.040 --> 01:53:16.040] Is it state law? Is it municipal ordinance? What authorizes them to write a parking ticket? [01:53:16.040 --> 01:53:21.040] What does the ordinance say that they... Who is governed by the ordinance? And so on [01:53:21.040 --> 01:53:28.040] and so forth. Go read my blog site on what ordinances are and what they aren't. [01:53:28.040 --> 01:53:31.040] Okay. What ordinances are and aren't. [01:53:31.040 --> 01:53:32.040] Okay. [01:53:32.040 --> 01:53:34.040] Okay. All right. I got you. [01:53:34.040 --> 01:53:40.040] All right. So go to the blog site, tauoflaw.wordpress.com. [01:53:40.040 --> 01:53:41.040] Tauer. [01:53:41.040 --> 01:53:46.040] Tau of law. T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W. [01:53:46.040 --> 01:53:48.040] O-F-A. [01:53:48.040 --> 01:53:51.040] T-A-O. [01:53:51.040 --> 01:53:52.040] O-F. [01:53:52.040 --> 01:53:53.040] Uh-huh. [01:53:53.040 --> 01:53:58.040] L-A-W dot wordpress dot com. [01:53:58.040 --> 01:54:04.040] Dot wordpress dot R. [01:54:04.040 --> 01:54:05.040] Dot com. [01:54:05.040 --> 01:54:10.040] Okay. Dot com. I'm sorry, dot com. And that was the other reason I called because I know [01:54:10.040 --> 01:54:15.040] I needed to go to that and she's gone. Okay. So I'll try to get that email to you again [01:54:15.040 --> 01:54:17.040] because I know you would have sent it by then. Can I go to... [01:54:17.040 --> 01:54:20.040] Yeah. If I had gotten it, I would have replied to it, but I don't have it. [01:54:20.040 --> 01:54:24.040] I know you would have. You know, since you sent it, I've never gotten any replies yet. [01:54:24.040 --> 01:54:28.040] And now you will know why. For whatever reason, they're not getting here. [01:54:28.040 --> 01:54:32.040] Okay. Well, I need to let you get back to the guide. I appreciate that. [01:54:32.040 --> 01:54:35.040] I'll follow up on it and get everything to you that you need. [01:54:35.040 --> 01:54:37.040] All right, Charles. Thank you. [01:54:37.040 --> 01:54:39.040] Thank you. All right. Bye-bye. [01:54:39.040 --> 01:54:42.040] Bye-bye. All right. Now, back to Steve in Florida. All right, Steve. [01:54:42.040 --> 01:54:44.040] Sorry for the interruption. Please continue. [01:54:44.040 --> 01:54:51.040] That's all right, Eddie. I'm wondering, is my attorney guilty of malfeasance [01:54:51.040 --> 01:54:55.040] or malpractice for not providing us with what we asked for in a timely manner? [01:54:55.040 --> 01:54:58.040] Three weeks ago, we asked for the notes that he took. [01:54:58.040 --> 01:55:04.040] If you can show that the actions of your attorney harm your case or harm your ability [01:55:04.040 --> 01:55:08.040] to fight that case, then most certainly you can go after him for that. [01:55:08.040 --> 01:55:12.040] If you can show that they advise you incorrectly, if you can show that they [01:55:12.040 --> 01:55:17.040] don't have an understanding of proper law and procedure in these cases, [01:55:17.040 --> 01:55:22.040] and they use that to harm you in some way or give you bad advice [01:55:22.040 --> 01:55:27.040] or cause you to lose and do nothing to really benefit you, [01:55:27.040 --> 01:55:29.040] then most certainly you can sue him. [01:55:29.040 --> 01:55:35.040] You can sue a defense attorney for parting his hair wrong. Okay? [01:55:35.040 --> 01:55:36.040] Okay. [01:55:36.040 --> 01:55:38.040] But if you actually want to get something out of him, [01:55:38.040 --> 01:55:43.040] then you've got to prove that he was required to part it differently than he did. [01:55:43.040 --> 01:55:48.040] I understand. And writing letters to them might also help document it. [01:55:48.040 --> 01:55:52.040] Not unless you're getting answers back that you can use against them later. [01:55:52.040 --> 01:55:56.040] You can document it without telling him that you're doing that, right? [01:55:56.040 --> 01:55:58.040] Yes, sir. [01:55:58.040 --> 01:56:02.040] All right. So what good is it going to do to write him a letter [01:56:02.040 --> 01:56:07.040] when you should be actually recording any conversation you have with him? [01:56:07.040 --> 01:56:11.040] Yes, sir. And during our conversation, the one that we did have, [01:56:11.040 --> 01:56:16.040] they said a lot of things that didn't sound helpful or what we wanted them to do, [01:56:16.040 --> 01:56:20.040] and then they said a few things that did talk about reasonable suspicion [01:56:20.040 --> 01:56:24.040] and the probable cause, but that was just half and half. [01:56:24.040 --> 01:56:28.040] So if I get a judicial order regarding the two charges that were dropped, [01:56:28.040 --> 01:56:31.040] Eddie, the domestic violence and the failure to show ID, [01:56:31.040 --> 01:56:35.040] then how do I focus on getting the assaults dropped? [01:56:35.040 --> 01:56:39.040] It's a different matter then, because the reason for the stop, [01:56:39.040 --> 01:56:43.040] according to the 9-11, sounded like white male chasing female, [01:56:43.040 --> 01:56:47.040] ran her, but then we're dropping all those. [01:56:47.040 --> 01:56:52.040] Okay. Let me explain why that's not going to be an argument. [01:56:52.040 --> 01:56:53.040] Okay. [01:56:53.040 --> 01:56:57.040] Even if it turns out during the officer's investigation of the call [01:56:57.040 --> 01:57:01.040] that there was no domestic abuse, but in the course of that investigation, [01:57:01.040 --> 01:57:03.040] you physically assaulted that officer. [01:57:03.040 --> 01:57:06.040] Do you honestly expect that you would get away with the charge of assault [01:57:06.040 --> 01:57:09.040] because they couldn't charge you with domestic abuse? [01:57:09.040 --> 01:57:11.040] Maybe not. [01:57:11.040 --> 01:57:14.040] There ain't no maybe to it. Not. That's all there is. [01:57:14.040 --> 01:57:15.040] Okay. [01:57:15.040 --> 01:57:17.040] That's why that argument won't fly. [01:57:17.040 --> 01:57:20.040] It doesn't matter that they didn't charge you with a domestic abuse [01:57:20.040 --> 01:57:25.040] or that they even dropped it, even though that was the initial reason for the contact, [01:57:25.040 --> 01:57:30.040] because an officer can go to investigate an alleged crime [01:57:30.040 --> 01:57:36.040] and encounter evidence in plain view or through actions of another crime, [01:57:36.040 --> 01:57:39.040] and he's still perfectly legitimately capable of arresting [01:57:39.040 --> 01:57:43.040] and charging for that other crime without ever having to do the first one. [01:57:43.040 --> 01:57:45.040] Okay. [01:57:45.040 --> 01:57:46.040] Okay. [01:57:46.040 --> 01:57:53.040] It's interesting that in the dispatcher audio at 1 minute, 21 seconds in, [01:57:53.040 --> 01:57:56.040] there were two officers that came up to us at the same time, [01:57:56.040 --> 01:57:58.040] and that's documented in their timeline. [01:57:58.040 --> 01:58:01.040] One of the officers at 121 said, [01:58:01.040 --> 01:58:04.040] I'm calling the suspect to the restaurant bar. [01:58:04.040 --> 01:58:09.040] Less than nine seconds later, another officer was screaming at 131, [01:58:09.040 --> 01:58:11.040] Drop your gun! [01:58:11.040 --> 01:58:14.040] So that was when the arrest and the physical assault was happening on me. [01:58:14.040 --> 01:58:16.040] Nine seconds later. [01:58:16.040 --> 01:58:21.040] Okay. Well, you can bring that up as a point and see what your attorneys think about it. [01:58:21.040 --> 01:58:22.040] Okay. [01:58:22.040 --> 01:58:25.040] All right. All right, Steve, I got to go. I am out of time. [01:58:25.040 --> 01:58:27.040] Larry, I'm sorry I wasn't able to get to you. [01:58:27.040 --> 01:58:33.040] I apologize. Time is limited on this show, and again, I would do more if I could. [01:58:33.040 --> 01:58:36.040] All right, folks, thanks for listening. Thanks for calling. [01:58:36.040 --> 01:58:38.040] I greatly appreciate y'all, as does the network. [01:58:38.040 --> 01:58:41.040] Please keep us in your prayers and in your finances. [01:58:41.040 --> 01:58:45.040] When and if you can, we are in desperate need here, always. [01:58:45.040 --> 01:58:50.040] So y'all have a great week, good night, and God bless. [01:58:50.040 --> 01:58:55.040] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible [01:58:55.040 --> 01:58:58.040] called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:58.040 --> 01:59:01.040] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes [01:59:01.040 --> 01:59:04.040] that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, [01:59:04.040 --> 01:59:08.040] helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.040 --> 01:59:11.040] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.040 --> 01:59:20.040] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.040 --> 01:59:26.040] This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:26.040 --> 01:59:30.040] plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.040 --> 01:59:33.040] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:33.040 --> 01:59:36.040] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, [01:59:36.040 --> 01:59:41.040] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.040 --> 01:59:51.040] That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:51.040 --> 01:59:54.040] Looking for some truth? You found it. [01:59:54.040 --> 02:00:11.040] LogosRadioNetwork.com