[00:00.000 --> 00:05.780]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily
[00:05.780 --> 00:13.400]  bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.400 --> 00:21.200]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.200 --> 00:28.760]  Markets for Friday, April 15, 2016 are currently treading with gold at $1,233.72 an ounce,
[00:28.760 --> 00:35.600]  over $16.21 an ounce, Texas crude $40.36 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting
[00:35.600 --> 00:44.360]  at about $430 U.S. currency.
[00:44.360 --> 00:50.280]  Today in history, the year 1865, Abraham Lincoln is shot at Ford's Theater in Washington,
[00:50.280 --> 00:51.280]  D.C.
[00:51.280 --> 00:56.960]  Honest Abe died today in history.
[00:56.960 --> 01:02.040]  In recent news, 22 Texas Republican district or county conventions passed resolutions calling
[01:02.040 --> 01:04.880]  for a vote on state secession in March.
[01:04.880 --> 01:09.160]  Though only 10 responded and actually validated the passage of such resolutions, an official
[01:09.160 --> 01:13.320]  count should be available from the Republican Party of Texas in early May.
[01:13.320 --> 01:17.040]  Last year, the Texas Nationalist Movement made headlines with a statewide tour of speaking
[01:17.040 --> 01:21.480]  events seeking enough signatures to get secession on the GOP primary ballot.
[01:21.480 --> 01:25.320]  Daniel Miller, the group's president, said that they came close, but not close enough.
[01:25.320 --> 01:31.080]  However, as a result, recruited and trained a lot of volunteers from Amarillo to San Antonio.
[01:31.080 --> 01:34.640]  Supporters of an independent Texas promote such efforts because of federal overreach,
[01:34.640 --> 01:38.520]  corruption, and excessive spending, not to mention the reality of Texas being large and
[01:38.520 --> 01:41.560]  economically independent enough to actually go it alone.
[01:41.560 --> 01:46.240]  And though the Supreme Court ruled in 1869 that states do not have the right to secede,
[01:46.240 --> 01:49.280]  secessionists are pointing out that these rulings will have no binding once a state
[01:49.280 --> 01:50.560]  declares independence.
[01:50.560 --> 01:53.960]  Federalists are warning that the federal government will be obligated to use force against such
[01:53.960 --> 01:59.680]  a move since it would be considered rebellion under federal regulation.
[01:59.680 --> 02:06.000]  150 federal to state law enforcement from various agencies assisted the Seguin Police
[02:06.000 --> 02:09.760]  Department with dozens of arrest warrants targeting Mexican mafia operations trafficking
[02:09.760 --> 02:12.600]  heroin and cocaine into Seguin and Nubrafuls.
[02:12.600 --> 02:16.300]  This mass-coordinated effort, 18 months in the planning, was set in motion when indictments
[02:16.300 --> 02:20.160]  unsealed Friday charged defendants with a conspiracy to possess and intent to distribute
[02:20.160 --> 02:21.880]  controlled substances.
[02:21.880 --> 02:26.160]  Police suspect that those rounded up are responsible for distributing heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine
[02:26.160 --> 02:28.720]  into Seguin and Nubrafuls since 2010.
[02:28.720 --> 02:32.320]  The alleged leader of the mafia, a lieutenant, is among the people arrested.
[02:32.320 --> 02:35.320]  Police say that these networks supply drugs from Austin to Houston and are believed to
[02:35.320 --> 02:37.840]  even have ties within the Texas prison system.
[02:37.840 --> 02:41.600]  It does seem police have found themselves a cozy permanent job waging the drug war.
[02:41.600 --> 02:45.660]  Unfortunately, these indefinite efforts will continue to remain so because of the criminalization
[02:45.660 --> 02:50.340]  of drugs themselves, consequently bringing in cartels, violence, smuggling, and millions
[02:50.340 --> 02:52.340]  of tax dollars gone to waste.
[02:52.340 --> 03:22.140]  This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for April 15th, 2016.
[03:23.140 --> 03:29.440]  Somebody's been abused, somebody blew up a building, somebody stole a car, somebody
[03:29.440 --> 03:39.240]  got away, somebody didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far.
[03:39.240 --> 03:46.240]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day son, a man had the answer for the wicked that he
[03:46.240 --> 03:53.240]  done, take all the rope in Texas, find a tall old tree, round up all of them bad boys, hang
[03:53.240 --> 04:01.240]  them high in the street, for all the people to see.
[04:01.240 --> 04:07.240]  That justice is the one thing you should always find, you gotta saddle up your boys, you gotta
[04:07.240 --> 04:09.240]  draw a hard line.
[04:09.240 --> 04:16.240]  When the gun smoke settles, we'll sing a victory tune and we'll haul me back at the local
[04:16.240 --> 04:17.240]  saloon.
[04:17.240 --> 04:25.240]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing, let's get for my men, bear for my
[04:25.240 --> 04:27.240]  horses.
[04:29.240 --> 04:31.240]  Alright folks, good evening.
[04:31.240 --> 04:37.240]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:37.240 --> 04:44.240]  Well, it's getting to be another one of those in weeks on this June 20th of 2016.
[04:44.240 --> 04:50.240]  Now, folks, I'm gonna make some commentary tonight and I would really, really, really
[04:50.240 --> 04:57.240]  like it if we could get some callers on point with this commentary that can offer something
[04:57.240 --> 05:00.240]  as an alternative or in refutation of what I'm about to say.
[05:00.240 --> 05:04.240]  I don't think you can, but give it a shot.
[05:04.240 --> 05:09.240]  If I have other callers, that's okay too, but just so you know, I would like to try
[05:09.240 --> 05:14.240]  to deal with a particular issue that's been on my mind for quite a while now and now I'm
[05:14.240 --> 05:18.240]  gonna put it to voice and make sure that the rest of you understand it for what it is as
[05:18.240 --> 05:20.240]  well.
[05:20.240 --> 05:34.240]  Do you people not realize that we have currently lost control and access to an entire department
[05:34.240 --> 05:37.240]  of our own government?
[05:37.240 --> 05:41.240]  Now, think about that.
[05:41.240 --> 05:48.240]  We have the three primary branches of government, legislative, executive, and judicial, right?
[05:48.240 --> 05:58.240]  We have attorneys sitting in every one of these branches and they control the judicial
[05:58.240 --> 06:04.240]  branch in its entirety.
[06:04.240 --> 06:07.240]  Now, I can hear the little wheels turning out there and I can hear people going, no,
[06:07.240 --> 06:13.240]  no, no, you don't have to be an attorney to be a JP or anything like that.
[06:13.240 --> 06:21.240]  Well, that's true, but a JP does not control the outcome of anything in this system.
[06:21.240 --> 06:25.240]  Neither does a municipal judge, even when it's a court of record.
[06:25.240 --> 06:38.240]  But if you are in a court of record, municipal, county, district, appellate, or Supreme Court,
[06:38.240 --> 06:45.240]  the Texas legislature, once again, via the control of the legislature by the attorneys,
[06:45.240 --> 06:53.240]  have created law that specifically prohibits anyone other than a bar card carrying attorney
[06:53.240 --> 06:57.240]  from occupying those positions.
[06:57.240 --> 07:03.240]  Now, the only one they don't actually have that in control of is the Supreme Court, but
[07:03.240 --> 07:08.240]  considering that you can't get on any other court of record without being a bar card carrying
[07:08.240 --> 07:15.240]  attorney, and the fact that our governors, our attorney generals, and everyone else in
[07:15.240 --> 07:22.240]  the executive of any power and authority are almost always and have been for several decades
[07:22.240 --> 07:29.240]  attorneys, just exactly how do you intend to get elected or appointed to one of those
[07:29.240 --> 07:34.240]  positions?
[07:34.240 --> 07:45.240]  The people have lost all control of the judiciary, not through even negligence, but through sheer
[07:45.240 --> 07:58.240]  usurpation, fraud, theft, extortion, and rebellion by our public servants to uphold the Constitution
[07:58.240 --> 08:08.240]  and to ensure that all laws and actions of that government are subordinate to the authority
[08:08.240 --> 08:11.240]  we delegated within it.
[08:11.240 --> 08:16.240]  And this is true of every branch, but let's look at what the issue becomes.
[08:16.240 --> 08:21.240]  Remember, the founding fathers said that the judiciary would become the most powerful branch
[08:21.240 --> 08:22.240]  of government.
[08:22.240 --> 08:23.240]  Why?
[08:23.240 --> 08:28.240]  Because the judiciary has the power to determine what the law is.
[08:28.240 --> 08:35.240]  They may not have to write it, but they can declare what it is.
[08:35.240 --> 08:40.240]  They can declare whether it's enforceable, whether it's not enforceable, how it can be
[08:40.240 --> 08:44.240]  interpreted and applied and how it can't.
[08:44.240 --> 08:57.240]  In the judiciary, you can control the other two departments by the opinions that you write.
[08:57.240 --> 09:00.240]  Think about that.
[09:00.240 --> 09:10.240]  We, the people, no longer can control the courts in any way that can set precedent that
[09:10.240 --> 09:14.240]  would establish the law.
[09:14.240 --> 09:18.240]  Now let me give you an example of why this is foremost in my mind.
[09:18.240 --> 09:23.240]  Now, some of you that have been around Austin and Brave New Books and things like that,
[09:23.240 --> 09:29.240]  y'all know of a young black man, his name is Jamar, or Osborne, and he filed a lawsuit
[09:29.240 --> 09:37.240]  against the current AG, Ken Paxton, because Ken Paxton is a bar card carrying attorney
[09:37.240 --> 09:44.240]  who is serving in the executive department of Texas government as the attorney general.
[09:44.240 --> 09:54.240]  The attorney general in Texas is a constitutionally established executive office, as is the governor.
[09:54.240 --> 10:00.240]  But Ken Paxton is a bar card carrying attorney sitting in that job, as was Greg Abbott.
[10:00.240 --> 10:01.240]  Okay?
[10:01.240 --> 10:08.240]  Now, here is the problem, in 1939, as we've said before, the Texas legislature, which
[10:08.240 --> 10:19.240]  was in one house 89% attorneys and in the other house 49% attorneys in 1939, created
[10:19.240 --> 10:23.240]  and enacted the State Bar Act.
[10:23.240 --> 10:25.240]  Okay?
[10:25.240 --> 10:36.240]  They basically gave themselves a monopoly on the ability to practice law within Texas.
[10:36.240 --> 10:40.240]  The attorneys did that by taking control of the legislature.
[10:40.240 --> 10:43.240]  Okay?
[10:43.240 --> 10:56.240]  Now, the court, the third court of appeals here in Austin, ruled against Jamar in his case by intentionally misreading
[10:56.240 --> 11:02.240]  and misapplying the language of the State Bar Act.
[11:02.240 --> 11:10.240]  What they did was they attempted to say in their opinion that attorneys, although they
[11:10.240 --> 11:19.240]  are judicial officers, are not themselves members of the judiciary.
[11:19.240 --> 11:20.240]  Okay?
[11:20.240 --> 11:23.240]  You get that?
[11:23.240 --> 11:29.240]  Now, our constitution establishes a judicial department.
[11:29.240 --> 11:30.240]  Okay?
[11:30.240 --> 11:38.240]  Not a judiciary, a judicial department.
[11:38.240 --> 11:43.240]  That department, as one of the three departments of government, is subject to the separation
[11:43.240 --> 11:47.240]  of powers clause in Article 2 of the Texas Constitution.
[11:47.240 --> 11:55.240]  And in there, it specifically states that no member of any department, and the exact
[11:55.240 --> 12:03.240]  language, more or less, is no person or group of persons being a member of any department
[12:03.240 --> 12:11.240]  shall exercise any power and authority belonging to any person or office of any other department.
[12:11.240 --> 12:13.240]  You got that?
[12:13.240 --> 12:16.240]  It speaks completely of departments.
[12:16.240 --> 12:23.240]  Well, the third court of appeals has attempted to separate the judicial department and the
[12:23.240 --> 12:30.240]  judiciary as if they are somehow different things.
[12:30.240 --> 12:33.240]  And here's my problem with that, first and foremost.
[12:33.240 --> 12:38.240]  If they're going to say that the judiciary is government, yet it is something separate
[12:38.240 --> 12:45.240]  and apart from the judicial department, they declare that the judiciary is extra-constitutional,
[12:45.240 --> 12:49.240]  because it is not defined by the Texas Constitution.
[12:49.240 --> 12:56.240]  The judicial department is, but the judiciary within that department is still a member of
[12:56.240 --> 12:57.240]  that department.
[12:57.240 --> 13:01.240]  But they're trying to say that they're separate things, and it's not possible, constitutionally
[13:01.240 --> 13:03.240]  or logically.
[13:03.240 --> 13:07.240]  But here's why it gets to be a bigger problem.
[13:07.240 --> 13:17.240]  Since no person or group of persons, no attorney or bar-card collective group of attorneys,
[13:17.240 --> 13:27.240]  may exercise the powers that are members of one department, i.e. the judicial department,
[13:27.240 --> 13:34.240]  shall exercise any power and authority belonging to any person or office in any other department,
[13:34.240 --> 13:39.240]  such as the governor or the attorney general.
[13:39.240 --> 13:44.240]  And why this is a problem and why I say they misrepresented the law in their opinion to
[13:44.240 --> 13:55.240]  get their way and maintain control, absolute control no less, of two departments of government.
[13:55.240 --> 13:59.240]  They tried to say the judiciary is not the same thing as the judicial.
[13:59.240 --> 14:05.240]  And then they tried to say that attorneys, even though they are judicial officers, are
[14:05.240 --> 14:07.240]  not members of the judiciary.
[14:07.240 --> 14:13.240]  So they admitted in their opinion that they are members of the judicial department, right?
[14:13.240 --> 14:18.240]  Even if they're saying they're not the judiciary.
[14:18.240 --> 14:27.240]  Well, the State Bar Act in 1939 clearly states that the State Bar is created and established
[14:27.240 --> 14:35.240]  as an administrative office of the judicial department.
[14:35.240 --> 14:43.240]  Exactly the same department the Third Court of Appeals said attorneys actually are.
[14:43.240 --> 14:49.240]  Now go back and revisit the language of Article 2 of the Texas Constitution once again, where
[14:49.240 --> 14:57.240]  it says, no person or group of persons belonging to any department of government, department
[14:57.240 --> 15:05.240]  of government, shall exercise any power and authority belonging to any member of any other
[15:05.240 --> 15:09.240]  department.
[15:09.240 --> 15:18.240]  There is no question the Third Court of Appeals decided this case incorrectly.
[15:18.240 --> 15:25.240]  Even more to the point, the issue becomes, did they do so with the express intent of
[15:25.240 --> 15:31.240]  subverting the Texas Constitution and thus commit treason and sedition against the state
[15:31.240 --> 15:36.240]  and the people?
[15:36.240 --> 15:48.240]  Any logical reading would have to come to the conclusion of absolutely they did.
[15:48.240 --> 15:55.240]  Our power to control our government is being stolen in increments day by day.
[15:55.240 --> 16:04.240]  And you sit idly by and watch the Cardassians butt grow bigger, their affairs get televised,
[16:04.240 --> 16:08.240]  your brain dead sports program that achieve absolutely nothing.
[16:08.240 --> 16:10.240]  How did one guy comment on it?
[16:10.240 --> 16:13.240]  I really can't see the sense in watching football.
[16:13.240 --> 16:20.240]  Why would I want to watch 20 some odd millionaires run around a field chasing a bag of wind in
[16:20.240 --> 16:25.240]  their underwear?
[16:25.240 --> 16:29.240]  And that's true of pretty much any sport you can think of.
[16:29.240 --> 16:31.240]  And I'm not saying sports shouldn't exist at all.
[16:31.240 --> 16:35.240]  They should exist for exercise, for fun and recreation.
[16:35.240 --> 16:42.240]  But to turn them into a profession, a career worth millions of dollars, while you've got
[16:42.240 --> 16:49.240]  people out here that work hard every day and can't even make ends meet, we've lost our
[16:49.240 --> 16:54.240]  sense of value, people, and we've lost our sense of self-worth.
[16:54.240 --> 16:56.240]  We need to do something about this.
[16:56.240 --> 16:58.240]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after the break.
[16:58.240 --> 17:01.240]  Y'all hang on.
[17:01.240 --> 17:05.240]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network
[17:05.240 --> 17:10.240]  on top of the on-air talent, producers and other hardworking individuals working behind
[17:10.240 --> 17:12.240]  the scenes?
[17:12.240 --> 17:15.240]  Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you.
[17:15.240 --> 17:20.240]  And we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year on our annual fundraisers,
[17:20.240 --> 17:23.240]  which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[17:23.240 --> 17:27.240]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution.
[17:27.240 --> 17:32.240]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks.
[17:32.240 --> 17:35.240]  First prize being a Spikes Skull Lower Receiver.
[17:35.240 --> 17:37.240]  Second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[17:37.240 --> 17:39.240]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor.
[17:39.240 --> 17:45.240]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud.
[17:45.240 --> 17:50.240]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[17:50.240 --> 17:52.240]  The Logos Radio Network fundraiser.
[17:52.240 --> 17:59.240]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[17:59.240 --> 18:05.240]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[18:05.240 --> 18:08.240]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:08.240 --> 18:14.240]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[18:14.240 --> 18:20.240]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:20.240 --> 18:24.240]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons.
[18:24.240 --> 18:26.240]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:26.240 --> 18:28.240]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[18:28.240 --> 18:33.240]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.240 --> 18:38.240]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.240 --> 18:40.240]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.240 --> 18:49.240]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.240 --> 19:00.240]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.240 --> 19:10.240]  If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradio.com
[19:30.240 --> 19:48.240]  Alright folks, we are back.
[19:48.240 --> 19:53.240]  Now, case in point, let me show you something else that I've recently come across here.
[19:53.240 --> 20:14.240]  Okay, the Supreme Court ruled, last Monday apparently, that evidence found by police officers after illegal stops may be used in court if the officers conducted their searches after learning that the defendants had outstanding arrest warrants.
[20:14.240 --> 20:41.240]  Get that? If they've issued any kind of warrant for you and even though the warrant is limited solely to your arrest, they can now augment the authority of that warrant by also using it to govern an illegal search and thus make the search not illegal.
[20:41.240 --> 20:52.240]  And then use against you whatever they find. That is the basic gist apparently of this. I haven't got to read the full opinion yet, but it is not looking pretty so far.
[20:52.240 --> 21:12.240]  And the case is Utah v. Streiff, number 14-1373. But this is the kind of things that the attorneys are doing to the law.
[21:12.240 --> 21:29.240]  Remember, every person sitting in the Supreme Court is an attorney, first and foremost. Second, the majority of Supreme Court justices that have served in this country have never served one minute as a trial judge in any court.
[21:29.240 --> 21:55.240]  You get that? Not one single minute as a trial judge. And most certainly, not one single minute studying the Constitution that they so often ignore and defile with their thought process.
[21:55.240 --> 22:10.240]  For me as a judge, the judging of any case would be extremely simple because I can't understand for the life of me why this is not the methodology by which every case begins.
[22:10.240 --> 22:25.240]  First and foremost, was the action perpetrated by the government? If so, all ears up, all eyes forward, pay attention, something is going to be wrong.
[22:25.240 --> 22:40.240]  Second thing, does any action of the government run afoul of any constitutional prohibition? I don't care if anybody raised the issue or not.
[22:40.240 --> 23:03.240]  If the facts stated for the case clearly show actions that violate constitutional prohibitions or procedures or individual rights protected by that Constitution, the case has to be dismissed.
[23:03.240 --> 23:14.240]  The government cannot do wrong to claim an action of right.
[23:14.240 --> 23:23.240]  That's just like anybody else trying to say they had to commit five crimes to save one innocent somewhere.
[23:23.240 --> 23:38.240]  I'm not talking about crimes against bad guys like self-defense or things like that. I'm talking just outright doing wrong and then claiming that the reason you're doing wrong is so that you can eventually do a right.
[23:38.240 --> 23:56.240]  No court should begin adjudication of any case without that analysis first and foremost because if anything in that analysis shows any of those facts to be true in relation to those such violations, then the government acted illegally.
[23:56.240 --> 24:10.240]  Instead of creating opinions that say there has to be a balance between the delegated powers of government and the rights of the people, I'm going to call bull on that. Let me explain why.
[24:10.240 --> 24:22.240]  First off, the rights of the people are paramount to the delegated powers of the government. How do we know this? Because we the people are the source of the delegated powers they are exercising.
[24:22.240 --> 24:35.240]  Therefore, our inherent rights, which no other man has any right to violate, cannot be delegated to our public servants to violate as our agents.
[24:35.240 --> 24:55.240]  So the individual rights are paramount. So anytime a delegated power placed within the hands of government runs a foul of a protected right, then the government is misusing that delegated power.
[24:55.240 --> 25:11.240]  It's that simple. If I give you the power to sell my car, but not my house, but you sell my car and my house, you have exceeded your authority of the power I delegated to you.
[25:11.240 --> 25:26.240]  Period. You have no authority to sell my house. And if I set a particular price point for my car that you are not to go below, you are not authorized to sell it for less than that price point.
[25:26.240 --> 25:43.240]  Not even if somebody says I got cash in hand, not even if the amount is only $1 less. Your authority is exactly and only what I delegated to you.
[25:43.240 --> 26:00.240]  Justice governments is exactly and only what the people delegated to them. And since I can't use that delegation to violate the rights of another, neither can my servants.
[26:00.240 --> 26:24.240]  So anytime they want to declare that they have to strike a balance, they're lying to you. They are usurping power that we didn't give them. They are undermining our constitutional republic for the sake of their own private profit and gain of money, power and control.
[26:24.240 --> 26:46.240]  I do not understand why people cannot see that. It's beyond me. And folks, I said it a thousand times. I don't think I'm the most intelligent guy in the room. Hell, I'll be lucky if I'm in the top 30, even if there's only 29 in the room.
[26:46.240 --> 27:06.240]  But one thing I do have is the ability to think logically and reasonably. And when things don't fit where someone's trying to put them like that square peg in a round hole, I tend to notice and I tend to say that doesn't belong there.
[27:06.240 --> 27:23.240]  And I've been saying this my entire life to most of the things I've watched develop through my lifetime. The decisions courts have made, the actions public servants take, the excuses they use for taking it, and the reason they say they're justified.
[27:23.240 --> 27:42.240]  Every one of them is wrong. Dead wrong. And we are now at that point, the tipping point, no less, of paying the ultimate price for allowing that to happen and to go on.
[27:42.240 --> 28:09.240]  We are sacrificing not only our nation, but ourselves and our families and our ability to live free. We're sacrificing it through apathy, through ignorance, and through general stupidity, an absolute refusal to examine the obvious.
[28:09.240 --> 28:23.240]  And even upon examination, the absolute willful ignorance and refusing to recognize and understand what you see.
[28:23.240 --> 28:37.240]  And I cannot for the life of me understand that mentality. I can't. That mentality makes me tired just to even consider that it exists, much less to watch it in action day in and day out.
[28:37.240 --> 28:54.240]  There's a reason people give up beating the drum from this side of the microphone. There is a reason. They get tired of watching the echo of that drum fall on deaf ears.
[28:54.240 --> 29:01.240]  What kind of call of action does it really take to spur Americans into acting anymore?
[29:01.240 --> 29:09.240]  What does it take to motivate you? What does it take to make you understand?
[29:09.240 --> 29:24.240]  Because no one person, no single handful of people, are going to effectuate the changes that need to come. We are now at the point where the Texas Bill of Rights needs to be used to its utmost.
[29:24.240 --> 29:41.240]  Article 1, Section 2 especially. All political power is retained by the people, and we have the right to abolish or reform our government by any and all means we deem necessary to our own benefit.
[29:41.240 --> 29:50.240]  We don't need them to allow it. We don't need them to okay it. It's not their government. It's ours.
[29:50.240 --> 30:00.240]  Alright folks, we'll start taking your calls on the other side. 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[30:00.240 --> 30:08.240]  We all know the FBI likes getting citizens to inform on their friends, but did you know Facebook is now up to the same dirty tricks?
[30:08.240 --> 30:15.240]  I'm Dr. Katharine Albrecht, and I'll tell you how Facebook is turning users into snitches that rat each other out next.
[30:15.240 --> 30:21.240]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.240 --> 30:26.240]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:26.240 --> 30:31.240]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.240 --> 30:34.240]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[30:34.240 --> 30:41.240]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.240 --> 30:45.240]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:45.240 --> 30:53.240]  In an age where every crumb of personal data is prized by snoopy governments and shady marketers, pseudonyms are shields of freedom.
[30:53.240 --> 30:58.240]  Fake names help us connect on the web without having to trade our most precious asset, privacy.
[30:58.240 --> 31:05.240]  But now Facebook is asking users to snitch on friends who use aliases, and it's got me hopping mad.
[31:05.240 --> 31:10.240]  By showing people's accounts to their Facebook friends and asking what that person's real name is,
[31:10.240 --> 31:17.240]  Facebook is assaulting a basic freedom to call ourselves whatever we choose, except, of course, on official documents.
[31:17.240 --> 31:23.240]  Facebook is not your friend, it's a snoop. Don't let it breach your trust with your real friends.
[31:23.240 --> 31:51.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:53.240 --> 32:01.240]  That saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367 only at mqsa.org.
[32:01.240 --> 32:05.240]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:05.240 --> 32:10.240]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.240 --> 32:13.240]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.240 --> 32:17.240]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:17.240 --> 32:20.240]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.240 --> 32:26.240]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.240 --> 32:29.240]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.240 --> 32:34.240]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.240 --> 32:36.240]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.240 --> 32:41.240]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.240 --> 32:46.240]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.240 --> 32:51.240]  and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.240 --> 32:55.240]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.240 --> 33:02.240]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.240 --> 33:15.240]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:15.240 --> 33:18.240]  Yeah, I got a warrant.
[33:18.240 --> 33:21.240]  And I'm going to solve them.
[33:21.240 --> 33:23.240]  To the head of government then.
[33:23.240 --> 33:26.240]  Prosecute them.
[33:26.240 --> 33:29.240]  Okay.
[33:29.240 --> 33:32.240]  Okay.
[33:32.240 --> 33:34.240]  Citizens of the race.
[33:34.240 --> 33:37.240]  For Mr. Bush.
[33:37.240 --> 33:39.240]  Citizens of the race.
[33:39.240 --> 33:41.240]  For Dick Cheney.
[33:41.240 --> 33:45.240]  Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me.
[33:45.240 --> 33:46.240]  All right, folks.
[33:46.240 --> 33:48.240]  We are back.
[33:48.240 --> 33:49.240]  Now, let's see.
[33:49.240 --> 33:51.240]  Who do we got up on the board here?
[33:51.240 --> 33:54.240]  First, we have Tom in Maryland.
[33:54.240 --> 33:56.240]  Tom, what can we do for you?
[33:56.240 --> 33:58.240]  Hey, Eddie.
[33:58.240 --> 33:59.240]  Love the show.
[33:59.240 --> 34:01.240]  Love what you're doing.
[34:01.240 --> 34:05.240]  I've got a problem getting speeding tickets.
[34:05.240 --> 34:07.240]  You have a problem getting speeding tickets?
[34:07.240 --> 34:10.240]  How's that possible?
[34:10.240 --> 34:12.240]  Well, I'm a big target.
[34:12.240 --> 34:18.240]  I have a Mercedes Sprinter, and it seems that I stand out.
[34:18.240 --> 34:23.240]  Is it one of the popular colors of Hello Officer Red?
[34:23.240 --> 34:27.240]  No, it's white, but it's about 10 feet tall.
[34:27.240 --> 34:30.240]  It looks like one of those FedEx trucks, delivery trucks.
[34:30.240 --> 34:31.240]  Okay.
[34:31.240 --> 34:36.240]  You know, I just got a ticket recently, and I was in a group of vehicles all going the same speed.
[34:36.240 --> 34:41.240]  I mean, the same speed, and I get picked out.
[34:41.240 --> 34:44.240]  How did he say he picked you out of a crowd of people?
[34:44.240 --> 34:46.240]  He did not say.
[34:46.240 --> 34:49.240]  Well, why didn't you ask?
[34:49.240 --> 34:55.240]  Well, it was very matter of fact about the thing.
[34:55.240 --> 34:57.240]  He just said, license or registration.
[34:57.240 --> 35:00.240]  I handed it to him, and he came back with a ticket.
[35:00.240 --> 35:01.240]  I didn't have to sign it.
[35:01.240 --> 35:04.240]  He just said, you have these three options.
[35:04.240 --> 35:06.240]  Officer one is paying it.
[35:06.240 --> 35:09.240]  Option two is request a waiver hearing.
[35:09.240 --> 35:16.240]  And then option three is requesting a trial with him, the judge, and myself.
[35:16.240 --> 35:18.240]  Well, all right.
[35:18.240 --> 35:20.240]  Him, the judge, and yourself.
[35:20.240 --> 35:24.240]  The jury trial is not an option, or it is an option?
[35:24.240 --> 35:26.240]  That is the jury trial.
[35:26.240 --> 35:28.240]  No, no, no, no, no.
[35:28.240 --> 35:29.240]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[35:29.240 --> 35:31.240]  Answer my question.
[35:31.240 --> 35:40.240]  Did he specifically say that you had a jury trial option, or is it only a trial by judge?
[35:40.240 --> 35:42.240]  He said jury trial.
[35:42.240 --> 35:44.240]  Okay.
[35:44.240 --> 35:45.240]  All right.
[35:45.240 --> 35:50.240]  If you have the right to a jury trial, then they're attempting to prosecute this in Maryland?
[35:50.240 --> 35:51.240]  Correct.
[35:51.240 --> 35:52.240]  Okay.
[35:52.240 --> 35:57.240]  And is Maryland civil infraction or criminal misdemeanor?
[35:57.240 --> 35:59.240]  Civil infraction.
[35:59.240 --> 36:03.240]  Then they have a problem.
[36:03.240 --> 36:05.240]  Okay.
[36:05.240 --> 36:11.240]  How does the officer get probable cause to make an arrest for a civil anything?
[36:11.240 --> 36:19.240]  Well, like most states that have this problem, I don't have the answer for you.
[36:19.240 --> 36:21.240]  Yeah, but I have it for you.
[36:21.240 --> 36:25.240]  I'm just trying to see if you've gone looking for it.
[36:25.240 --> 36:29.240]  Because if you love the show, you've heard this several times already.
[36:29.240 --> 36:31.240]  I do, but I'm kind of on the spot.
[36:31.240 --> 36:33.240]  It's the same thing.
[36:33.240 --> 36:42.240]  If you're sure that Maryland, in this case, speeding is a civil infraction, then you have exactly the same options the California folks do.
[36:42.240 --> 36:45.240]  The stop itself was illegal.
[36:45.240 --> 36:49.240]  There was no probable cause.
[36:49.240 --> 36:50.240]  Okay.
[36:50.240 --> 37:03.240]  There are three articles on my blog site dealing with lack of probable cause in a traffic stop and civil infractions, what to do if your state has them, and fruit of the poison tree doctrine.
[37:03.240 --> 37:05.240]  Okay.
[37:05.240 --> 37:10.240]  Now there's two articles specifically that deal with probable cause.
[37:10.240 --> 37:14.240]  You need to read all four of those total off of my blog.
[37:14.240 --> 37:23.240]  And the blog is tauoflaw.wordpress.com.
[37:23.240 --> 37:32.240]  Now the information, and especially the interrogatories in the civil infractions article, are important to your discovery.
[37:32.240 --> 37:33.240]  Okay.
[37:33.240 --> 37:49.240]  All right, because you're going to use that discovery and those interrogatories to move for a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction due to fruit of the poison tree resulting from an illegal warrantless arrest by the officer.
[37:49.240 --> 37:56.240]  I was hoping that was, it took me forever to find out if it was a criminal or civil infraction.
[37:56.240 --> 38:01.240]  It's just not, you know, one of these things that seems to be easy to find out.
[38:01.240 --> 38:06.240]  Yeah, well, generally when there's civil infractions, most states will try to tell you you don't have a right to a jury trial.
[38:06.240 --> 38:10.240]  That's also wrong, but that's what they try to do.
[38:10.240 --> 38:12.240]  That's what California does, for instance.
[38:12.240 --> 38:16.240]  They try to say that because it's not criminal, you don't have a right to a jury trial.
[38:16.240 --> 38:30.240]  They seem to forget the fact that every state constitution and the federal constitution forbids the removal of a jury trial for any civil amount in excess of $20.
[38:30.240 --> 38:31.240]  Excellent.
[38:31.240 --> 38:32.240]  Okay.
[38:32.240 --> 38:56.240]  So what they're really trying to tell you is it's neither a real civil, this is an administrative punitive action, which is forbidden under the Bill of Pains and Penalties Clause and or Bill of Attainer Clause, which includes Bill of Pains and Penalties in every state constitution and the federal constitution as well.
[38:56.240 --> 39:11.240]  Because the very definition of a Bill of Attainer or a Bill of Pains and Penalties is a non-judicial administrative or legislative determination of guilt without any judicial review.
[39:11.240 --> 39:22.240]  And when they tell you that you have no authority to have a jury trial and that your only recourse is what the presiding officer over the case says you get, that's all administrative.
[39:22.240 --> 39:36.240]  And if your appeal does not go to an actual judicial court, but just another administrative functionary, then that entire process was the Bill of Pains and Penalties.
[39:36.240 --> 39:38.240]  Sounds like it's going to be fun.
[39:38.240 --> 39:41.240]  It is if you build it right.
[39:41.240 --> 39:43.240]  I'm going to do my best.
[39:43.240 --> 39:47.240]  As the saying goes, if you build it, they will come.
[39:47.240 --> 39:57.240]  What are the biggest pitfalls or the trouble that I might find myself in, even if I do follow as well as I can?
[39:57.240 --> 40:04.240]  Well, now you're asking me to pull out a crystal ball and tell you what these idiots are going to do, legal or illegal, and I just can't do that.
[40:04.240 --> 40:05.240]  I know.
[40:05.240 --> 40:16.240]  Legally speaking, there's nothing they can do to you for putting on a vigorous defense and demanding your right of due process and holding them accountable under the law for the fact that the officer committed an illegal stop.
[40:16.240 --> 40:19.240]  Legally speaking, there's nothing they can do to you.
[40:19.240 --> 40:25.240]  But vindictively speaking, there ain't no telling.
[40:25.240 --> 40:32.240]  So that's why you don't ever go into one of these little hearings of theirs without witnesses and without things that record.
[40:32.240 --> 40:36.240]  If you can possibly get anything that can record in there.
[40:36.240 --> 40:40.240]  Well, I wasn't able to record, but he told me he was recording.
[40:40.240 --> 40:41.240]  Who?
[40:41.240 --> 40:43.240]  The officer.
[40:43.240 --> 40:50.240]  OK, but now you have to try to get what he was recording and hope that it's 100 percent there and accurate.
[40:50.240 --> 40:51.240]  Correct.
[40:51.240 --> 40:57.240]  OK, now I'm going to ask you why the hell were you not recording?
[40:57.240 --> 41:00.240]  That's a fair question.
[41:00.240 --> 41:02.240]  I don't.
[41:02.240 --> 41:03.240]  I have no answer.
[41:03.240 --> 41:10.240]  You can afford a Mercedes, but can't afford to learn how to operate the camera and recording on your cell phone.
[41:10.240 --> 41:13.240]  You're right.
[41:13.240 --> 41:18.240]  And I just installed an app on it, too, that would allow me to just one put one button start the recording.
[41:18.240 --> 41:32.240]  Well, if you're going to be that fumble fingered and jumble brain when this stuff happens, you might want to find something that actually mounts in that thing you're driving or traveling around in rather that will always be recording.
[41:32.240 --> 41:34.240]  I am looking for something.
[41:34.240 --> 41:38.240]  OK, do that with that not being the phone.
[41:38.240 --> 41:41.240]  Yeah, and there are there are several ways to do it.
[41:41.240 --> 41:54.240]  Some of the better ones are actually to have good cameras like GoPros that stream directly or record directly onto a laptop or notebook, lightweight notebook hard drive or a tablet hard drive.
[41:54.240 --> 42:03.240]  And the tablet then is connected to a live wireless Internet connection so it can stream that video out as it's recording it.
[42:03.240 --> 42:04.240]  That's awesome.
[42:04.240 --> 42:14.240]  OK, for instance, you can get what's called Elgato HD Pro 60.
[42:14.240 --> 42:27.240]  They have a USB version of that video recorder that will record high resolution video directly to a computer device and live stream it at the same time.
[42:27.240 --> 42:39.240]  So you've got a high quality recording on the notebook, the tablet or whatever you're using, plus you're streaming it through the live Internet connection out at whatever quality you need to whatever service you need to.
[42:39.240 --> 42:46.240]  And this card is pretty pretty configurable in its software where you can attach it dang near anything.
[42:46.240 --> 42:58.240]  OK, even YouTube, so it'd be real easy to get your stuff streamed out and protected even if the cop shut everything off, it would still be there up to that point.
[42:58.240 --> 42:59.240]  Sure.
[42:59.240 --> 43:02.240]  OK, so there's tons of ways to do it.
[43:02.240 --> 43:17.240]  So no more excuses, folks, about not doing it, because believe me, if they don't want to give you that video, they will him haul delay and beg forgiveness on never providing it until you are at trial and don't have it.
[43:17.240 --> 43:21.240]  And then judge is going to try to say, well, you didn't do what you need to do to get it.
[43:21.240 --> 43:25.240]  You didn't come to me and demand that I order them to give it to you.
[43:25.240 --> 43:34.240]  And here the thing is, the judge has complete discretion at determining what he wants to allow them to give you in discovery, which is wrong.
[43:34.240 --> 43:36.240]  But he can do it.
[43:36.240 --> 43:41.240]  Therefore, it would behoove you to have your own.
[43:41.240 --> 43:42.240]  All right, Tom, hang on just a second.
[43:42.240 --> 43:44.240]  And I'll let you have a word when we get back.
[43:44.240 --> 43:45.240]  OK.
[43:45.240 --> 43:46.240]  Yeah.
[43:46.240 --> 43:46.240]  All right.
[43:46.240 --> 43:47.240]  Hold on just a minute.
[43:47.240 --> 43:48.240]  All right, folks.
[43:48.240 --> 44:00.240]  512-646-1984 is the call in number, y'all get in line, let's talk, we'll be right back.
[44:00.240 --> 44:03.240]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.240 --> 44:15.240]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:15.240 --> 44:19.240]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.240 --> 44:23.240]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.240 --> 44:28.240]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.240 --> 44:34.240]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:34.240 --> 44:43.240]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.240 --> 45:03.240]  To receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.240 --> 45:13.240]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas.
[45:13.240 --> 45:18.240]  I'm Brave New Books and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.240 --> 45:23.240]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.240 --> 45:31.240]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian EME oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.240 --> 45:44.240]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.240 --> 45:48.240]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.240 --> 46:14.240]  Visit naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.240 --> 46:42.240]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:42.240 --> 46:47.240]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig, and we are talking with Tom in Maryland.
[46:47.240 --> 46:49.240]  All right, Tom.
[46:49.240 --> 46:50.240]  Yeah.
[46:50.240 --> 46:53.240]  You know, we're not going to challenge the merits of the case.
[46:53.240 --> 46:55.240]  Should I have to worry about?
[46:55.240 --> 47:04.240]  Why would you challenge merits when you have due process and rights violations that forbid them to even get to merit?
[47:04.240 --> 47:06.240]  That's why I'm asking you.
[47:06.240 --> 47:10.240]  I shouldn't need to get that officer's video or...
[47:10.240 --> 47:17.240]  No, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. You want the video anyway, okay?
[47:17.240 --> 47:23.240]  Because what you're going to show is that no time did the officer ever...
[47:23.240 --> 47:27.240]  The video is proof that you were stopped besides the citation, okay?
[47:27.240 --> 47:30.240]  Okay, yeah.
[47:30.240 --> 47:34.240]  And the officer never gave you a justifiable reason for the stop.
[47:34.240 --> 47:40.240]  Hey, bud, I have a warrant for your arrest. Hey, bud, I saw you commit an actual crime and so on and so forth.
[47:40.240 --> 47:43.240]  He, in fact, tells you nothing, right?
[47:43.240 --> 47:45.240]  He says, do you know why I pulled you over?
[47:45.240 --> 47:46.240]  And what do you say?
[47:46.240 --> 47:49.240]  I do not. I said, I do not know why you pulled me over.
[47:49.240 --> 47:52.240]  And what does he say?
[47:52.240 --> 47:54.240]  He said you were...
[47:54.240 --> 47:58.240]  You know, basically, I think he said you were exceeding the speed limit.
[47:58.240 --> 47:59.240]  Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding.
[47:59.240 --> 48:09.240]  If you know for a fact that exceeding the speed limit is a civil infraction and not an actual criminal misdemeanor,
[48:09.240 --> 48:15.240]  he has now admitted the stop is illegal and the video proves that.
[48:15.240 --> 48:18.240]  Hence, the reason you want it.
[48:18.240 --> 48:23.240]  Unless I find out otherwise that it's a criminal. I mean, I understand that it's a civil...
[48:23.240 --> 48:29.240]  Yeah. Well, the thing is you better find out one way or the other because the wrong way is going to get you hurt.
[48:29.240 --> 48:35.240]  Yeah. For some reason, it's not the easiest thing to find out in this state.
[48:35.240 --> 48:44.240]  They classify this two different levels of infraction, but neither one of they hardly ever says whether it's civil or criminal.
[48:44.240 --> 48:55.240]  I did find a lawyer site that all...well, not all, but minor infractions such as speeding are civil.
[48:55.240 --> 49:01.240]  Okay. And does he give you a particular site in the law of the state that says so?
[49:01.240 --> 49:05.240]  It doesn't, but I will find out for sure. I mean, definitely.
[49:05.240 --> 49:13.240]  Okay. If it's not in the statutes, it may be in case law where they make the ruling that it's not a crime.
[49:13.240 --> 49:21.240]  But if you get anything that says it's not a crime, then the officer is hosed. The arrest was illegal.
[49:21.240 --> 49:29.240]  Okay. I have another thing. I look at the transportation code under definitions,
[49:29.240 --> 49:34.240]  and I cannot find anything that defines the word transportation in the transportation code.
[49:34.240 --> 49:42.240]  Does no one listen to me? They will not define the term in the transportation code.
[49:42.240 --> 49:50.240]  They don't do it here either. Do you know why? Because if they did, it would blow the whole game right out of the water.
[49:50.240 --> 49:56.240]  They wouldn't have been able to commit fraud for decades because it would have been too easy to go right to the code and say,
[49:56.240 --> 49:59.240]  What are you doing?
[49:59.240 --> 50:01.240]  I thought that's what you were basing your...
[50:01.240 --> 50:07.240]  No. I am basing it upon the fact that they have not defined it.
[50:07.240 --> 50:13.240]  Okay. I am basing it upon the fact that that doesn't mean there isn't a definition.
[50:13.240 --> 50:18.240]  It simply means the legislature chose to use that definition.
[50:18.240 --> 50:19.240]  Sure.
[50:19.240 --> 50:24.240]  Okay. If they don't define it in statute, what's the rule the courts say?
[50:24.240 --> 50:28.240]  They say that it shall be given its common meaning, right?
[50:28.240 --> 50:29.240]  Yeah.
[50:29.240 --> 50:34.240]  Unless the law says something different. Well, guess what? Texas law does.
[50:34.240 --> 50:45.240]  In the Texas government code, it says in chapter 312 that any term of art that has a special meaning defined by law or by an industry
[50:45.240 --> 50:51.240]  shall have the meaning assigned by that law or that industry.
[50:51.240 --> 50:59.240]  Well, if case law is to be construed as law and the Supreme Court of the United States says transportation means A,
[50:59.240 --> 51:15.240]  and the industry says transportation also means A, then I have it on good authority that my definition trumps yours since you didn't make one.
[51:15.240 --> 51:17.240]  See what I'm saying?
[51:17.240 --> 51:18.240]  Oh, yeah.
[51:18.240 --> 51:25.240]  I'm not saying it's in their code. I'm saying you have the opportunity to prove them wrong because it isn't in their code.
[51:25.240 --> 51:27.240]  Right.
[51:27.240 --> 51:31.240]  I was getting very upset.
[51:31.240 --> 51:36.240]  Let's see. What's my other rule here, Tom? Listen to what you hear.
[51:36.240 --> 51:42.240]  Yeah. I'm new at this, so.
[51:42.240 --> 51:46.240]  Arguing or learning?
[51:46.240 --> 51:49.240]  Both, I guess.
[51:49.240 --> 51:51.240]  All right. Well, good luck with it then.
[51:51.240 --> 51:55.240]  I wasn't a good student growing up, so now I'm trying to make up for that.
[51:55.240 --> 52:02.240]  Well, guess what? There are stiffer, steeper, expensive penalties for not learning as an adult.
[52:02.240 --> 52:06.240]  Correct.
[52:06.240 --> 52:13.240]  All right. You get taken advantage of a lot more as an adult than you do as a child for not learning.
[52:13.240 --> 52:17.240]  I know.
[52:17.240 --> 52:19.240]  All right. Anything else you got?
[52:19.240 --> 52:20.240]  No, I'm good. Thank you very much.
[52:20.240 --> 52:23.240]  All right. You're welcome. Thanks for calling in.
[52:23.240 --> 52:29.240]  All right. Now we're going to go to Charles in Washington. Charles, what do you got?
[52:29.240 --> 52:32.240]  Oh, this is Sam Zag. How are you doing this evening?
[52:32.240 --> 52:37.240]  That's about temperature as regards to those tow vehicles.
[52:37.240 --> 52:47.240]  It got impounded. My vehicles got impounded because of the over 45-day rule that they made up here on statute of expired tax.
[52:47.240 --> 53:00.240]  So since then, you told me to file a suit, and I needed to know exactly what I needed to know in order for the places to go to file that suit for that.
[53:00.240 --> 53:08.240]  But in the meantime, I did have a shut-up hearing, and I had a few interesting documents that I came up with that I was going to send you.
[53:08.240 --> 53:10.240]  I'm going to send you.
[53:10.240 --> 53:20.240]  First thing you need to do, Charles, is get your hands on a copy of Jurisdictionary if you don't have it. That will teach you everything you need to know about how to file a lawsuit and keep it going.
[53:20.240 --> 53:30.240]  The only thing you have to be aware of is it does not deal with lawsuits against government officials specifically, so you're going to have to add to that knowledge as you go.
[53:30.240 --> 53:31.240]  Okay? Okay.
[53:31.240 --> 53:37.240]  But it can teach you the basic ins and outs of a standard lawsuit within 12 hours if you're paying attention.
[53:37.240 --> 53:51.240]  Second thing, once you learn what you need to learn as far as terminology and process from Jurisdictionary, you need to find a local self-help society there.
[53:51.240 --> 53:59.240]  Most of them, there are all kinds of legal aid societies, okay? And they help people with legal issues.
[53:59.240 --> 54:18.240]  So find one in the area you're in. Go to them, explain to them the situation, but you'll at least be able to talk to them somewhat in their own language to help them understand it faster, and they can potentially help you walk through the process as it pertains to your state.
[54:18.240 --> 54:19.240]  Okay.
[54:19.240 --> 54:29.240]  Okay, as far as what court to file in and so on and so forth and everything else Jurisdictionary can handle. You just have to find the particular laws you need.
[54:29.240 --> 54:39.240]  Okay, and that brings up the other question. I listened to your show, and I just found out since the last time I've talked to you that there's a class you offer.
[54:39.240 --> 54:50.240]  And so, and I know my first list to you, there was a German, he was attorney, called a Judiciary, and I think it was $200-something when you had freelance...
[54:50.240 --> 55:05.240]  No, Jurisdictionary is different than mine. Mine is a traffic seminar. It's $250. Jurisdictionary, I think, is $249. It's almost the same, but not quite. $279, something like that. I don't know.
[55:05.240 --> 55:11.240]  It's been a long time since I've looked at the price of it, but you're actually talking about two different things.
[55:11.240 --> 55:21.240]  All right. All right. So, you know, she did talk to me about it after I asked you to go back on the website to look up everything that you went over in the past months and years.
[55:21.240 --> 55:26.240]  So, she did find that there was a class you offered. So, that is called Jurisdictionary.
[55:26.240 --> 55:38.240]  Jurisdictionary. You can order it from the Logos Radio Network website. Logosradionetwork.com has a link on there for purchasing Jurisdictionary.
[55:38.240 --> 56:06.240]  Okay. And that's what she was talking about. So, good. I got that one because I was going to do that. Now, the other thing, when I went to that TOE hearing, the gentleman was talking about the practices. He used that word. I just looked at a gentleman named William Beale on the 1871 article that was written up, and I found it very interesting that the gentleman also mentioned the same terminology when I went there.
[56:06.240 --> 56:27.240]  So, when I took the information that I had to him, he couldn't address the issues. He told me I had to go to court, which I already know, and that's why I'm hoping for you to still find that information that you said is buried, because I'm going to definitely need that when I go to fight these folks in district court about me not having to have my card registered and what they're doing is illegal.
[56:27.240 --> 56:37.240]  So, when you told me I need to take this up and fight it to sue them, I need to know all the information on that. So, did you have some particularly on that whole?
[56:37.240 --> 57:03.240]  Yeah. Hang on just a second. There is tons of information relating to what is required in Washington, and it most certainly does not apply to anything that's non-commercial. It says very clearly in the Washington statutes that it does not apply to any vehicle that is used strictly for recreational purposes or travel.
[57:03.240 --> 57:27.240]  Okay? Okay. I'm listing. So, even in relation to a license, the statute they try to charge you with not having a license under in Washington state, actually the chapter, just like the chapter here in Texas that says you have to have a license issued by this chapter, the chapter they listed in the Washington statute doesn't define a license.
[57:27.240 --> 57:43.240]  So, there's no license that can be issued under the chapter they're saying you commit a violation for by not having one. And then the only chapter in their code that does require a license is a commercial driver's license.
[57:43.240 --> 57:57.240]  Get out of here. Okay. Okay. So, there's tons of different things you can find just by reading generally, much less specifically. But yeah, did you send me a contact email like I asked you to?
[57:57.240 --> 58:21.240]  A non-contact email? An email. Did you send me an email? Yes, I did send you an email and I still have the chance to respond, but the thing is you said you had to go dig this stuff up for me. That's a bad idea. Okay. Yeah. I'll do it. I've got that. I've got that information. I'll get it to you here as quick as I can this evening after I get off the air. Okay?
[58:21.240 --> 58:48.240]  Hold on. The thing I'm going to send you will have all that information in it. It will tell you exactly where to go look. Okay. All right, folks. We'll be right back after the break. Y'all hang in there.
[58:48.240 --> 59:06.240]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:06.240 --> 59:27.240]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.240 --> 59:50.240]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.240 --> 01:00:00.240]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.240 --> 01:00:20.240]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily bulletins for the commodities market. Today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:20.240 --> 01:00:43.240]  Markets for Friday, April 15, 2016 are currently treading with gold $1,233.72 an ounce, silver $16.21 an ounce, Texas crude $40.36 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $430 US currency.
[01:00:43.240 --> 01:00:56.240]  Today in history, the year 1865, Abraham Lincoln is shot at Ford's Theater in Washington DC. Honest Abe died today in history.
[01:00:56.240 --> 01:01:13.240]  In recent news, 22 Texas Republican district or county conventions passed resolutions calling for a vote on state secession in March. Though only 10 responded and actually validated the passage of such resolutions, an official count should be available from the Republican Party of Texas in early May.
[01:01:13.240 --> 01:01:21.240]  Last year, the Texas nationalist movement made headlines with a statewide tour of speaking events seeking enough signatures to get secession on the GOP primary ballot.
[01:01:21.240 --> 01:01:30.240]  Daniel Miller, the group's president, said that they came close, but not close enough. However, as a result, recruited and trained a lot of volunteers from Amarillo to San Antonio.
[01:01:30.240 --> 01:01:41.240]  Supporters of an independent Texas promote such efforts because of federal overreach, corruption, and excessive spending, not to mention the reality of Texas being large and economically independent enough to actually go it alone.
[01:01:41.240 --> 01:02:02.240]  And though the Supreme Court ruled in 1869 that states do not have the right to secede, secessionists are pointing out that these rulings will have no binding once the state declares independence. Federalists are warning that the federal government will be obligated to use force against such a move since it would be considered rebellion under federal regulation.
[01:02:02.240 --> 01:02:12.240]  150 federal to state law enforcement from various agencies assisted the Seguin Police Department with dozens of arrest warrants targeting Mexican mafia operations trafficking heroin and cocaine into Seguin and Yubrafos.
[01:02:12.240 --> 01:02:21.240]  This mass-coordinated effort, 18 months into planning, was set in motion when indictments unsealed Friday charged defendants with a conspiracy to possess and intent to distribute controlled substances.
[01:02:21.240 --> 01:02:28.240]  Authorities suspect that those rounded up are responsible for distributing heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine into Seguin and Yubrafos since 2010.
[01:02:28.240 --> 01:02:37.240]  The alleged leader of the mafia, a lieutenant, is among the people arrested. Police say that these networks supply drugs from Austin to Houston and are believed to even have ties within the Texas prison system.
[01:02:37.240 --> 01:02:54.240]  It does seem police have found themselves a cozy permanent job waging the drug war. Unfortunately, these indefinite efforts will continue to remain so because of the criminalization of drugs themselves, consequently bringing in cartels, violence, smuggling, and millions of tax dollars gone to waste.
[01:02:54.240 --> 01:02:59.240]  This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for April 15th, 2016.
[01:03:24.240 --> 01:03:53.240]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:53.240 --> 01:03:59.240]  And now we are talking with Jeff in Mississippi. Jeff, what can we do for you?
[01:03:59.240 --> 01:04:04.240]  Hey Eddie, thanks for having me on. I've got two questions.
[01:04:04.240 --> 01:04:28.240]  And the first one is, I am in a lawsuit against some attorneys and state officials. It's a federal suit. And we have been going back and forth with motions, but what I've got now is I've got the opposing attorney sending responses and answers, but he is demanding a prayer.
[01:04:28.240 --> 01:04:35.240]  He has a prayer in his answer. Can you do that? Can that be done?
[01:04:35.240 --> 01:04:51.240]  I would suppose so. Is there anything in the law that says it's not required? I mean, if he is answering, he has the right to say, we hope that you will find our facts to be true and dismiss his allegation on this point.
[01:04:51.240 --> 01:05:05.240]  Okay. Well, I mean, he's wanting money also. Is he filing an answer or is he filing a challenge to dismiss for a 12b-6?
[01:05:05.240 --> 01:05:24.240]  Well, he did a 12b-6, which he's asking for court costs, but he's also answered my motion and he's responded. And in those responses, he also has a prayer, where for the defendant asked for court costs and attorney's fees.
[01:05:24.240 --> 01:05:35.240]  Okay. Well, what he's trying to do is cover his basis. If the court denies one motion but grants the other, then he has the ability to say, does that include the court costs?
[01:05:35.240 --> 01:05:41.240]  Okay. So I need to respond to his answers and responses.
[01:05:41.240 --> 01:05:59.240]  If you can show that he's misleading the court or misrepresenting the facts in some way or is not actually answering the allegation, most certainly, shoot down anything he's got before it gets any toehold.
[01:05:59.240 --> 01:06:15.240]  I shot in my response. However, in my prayer, I asked to dismiss his claim or his response. However, I did not identify the money part exactly. I just said to rule.
[01:06:15.240 --> 01:06:21.240]  Your suit is claiming recovery for those fees, right?
[01:06:21.240 --> 01:06:31.240]  Yes. Okay. So if he gets the dismissal, then he wants his costs covered if he wins the dismissal.
[01:06:31.240 --> 01:06:41.240]  Okay. If he doesn't, you don't need to be asking for them in your answers to him because your suit requests them.
[01:06:41.240 --> 01:06:44.240]  Okay.
[01:06:44.240 --> 01:06:45.240]  Okay.
[01:06:45.240 --> 01:06:55.240]  All right. That was kind of confusing. The second question is, I've got a federal suit at Title 42.
[01:06:55.240 --> 01:07:17.240]  The action took place in Mississippi. However, I live in Arkansas and Title 28 U.S. Code 1391, venue generally, the Section E1 actions where the defendant is an officer or employee of the United States.
[01:07:17.240 --> 01:07:28.240]  It claims that the plaintiff can file the case or the federal case in the state where he lives. In my case, that would be Arkansas, and that would be nice.
[01:07:28.240 --> 01:07:33.240]  Yeah. But are you suing state officials or are you suing federal officials?
[01:07:33.240 --> 01:07:35.240]  I'm suing state officials.
[01:07:35.240 --> 01:07:37.240]  Okay. And read what you just said again.
[01:07:37.240 --> 01:07:49.240]  The officer or employee of the United States. It says the officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof acting in his official capacity or...
[01:07:49.240 --> 01:07:53.240]  Right, which nobody within the states are.
[01:07:53.240 --> 01:07:54.240]  Okay.
[01:07:54.240 --> 01:08:03.240]  Constitutionally speaking, the states are not agents of the federal government. It's exactly the opposite, in fact, since the states created the federal government.
[01:08:03.240 --> 01:08:04.240]  All right.
[01:08:04.240 --> 01:08:12.240]  Okay. Nor are they officers of the United States. See, this is something where the patronets just irk me to no end.
[01:08:12.240 --> 01:08:23.240]  Even though our state officials may be subverting the law, the Constitution, and everything else by acting as if they're United States officials, they aren't.
[01:08:23.240 --> 01:08:28.240]  Not in any sense of the definition are they United States officials.
[01:08:28.240 --> 01:08:34.240]  They are state officials. Period. Okay.
[01:08:34.240 --> 01:08:54.240]  So don't ever make the mistake of putting a state official under the umbrella of a United States official unless you have specific evidence that shows that state official was acting under direct authority and supervision and instruction or direction of somebody in the United States.
[01:08:54.240 --> 01:08:56.240]  Got it.
[01:08:56.240 --> 01:09:02.240]  So they're right. I need to start that case in Mississippi and not in Arkansas.
[01:09:02.240 --> 01:09:04.240]  Probably.
[01:09:04.240 --> 01:09:12.240]  I would say that if they're state officials and not United States officials and that's the argument they're making, that's exactly why they're making it.
[01:09:12.240 --> 01:09:26.240]  Okay, so they win that one. We need to do it in Mississippi. Yeah, you can refile in Mississippi or have it transferred to Mississippi. I don't know which one they let you do.
[01:09:26.240 --> 01:09:42.240]  Actually, I reversed it. I filed it first in Mississippi and then someone told me I could file it, refile it in Arkansas, which would be more convenient for me. No, you can only do that under the conditions in which it's stated if you're suing a United States official.
[01:09:42.240 --> 01:09:54.240]  Now, if they had initiated an action against you, you could have demanded since you're out of state that they file it in your venue.
[01:09:54.240 --> 01:09:57.240]  All right.
[01:09:57.240 --> 01:10:01.240]  Okay.
[01:10:01.240 --> 01:10:03.240]  All right. Anything else?
[01:10:03.240 --> 01:10:10.240]  Nope, that's it. I sure appreciate it. Thank you. Yes, sir. You have a good night. Good luck. Oh, all right. You too. All right. Bye bye.
[01:10:10.240 --> 01:10:21.240]  All right, folks. I'm gonna say this again. Read before you act and don't be listening to people when you haven't verified the information you're getting.
[01:10:21.240 --> 01:10:37.240]  This is a perfect example of that. This information where people read things and think they understand it and come up with these idiotic pieces of advice that are going to get you to lose your case or get you hurt in the process aren't going to fly.
[01:10:37.240 --> 01:10:50.240]  People do not read this stuff correctly. Most of the time, they theorize it to death, but they can't put it together to save their life. And yet they're going to give advice on it.
[01:10:50.240 --> 01:10:55.240]  Verify things yourself or suffer the consequences.
[01:10:55.240 --> 01:11:00.240]  All right. Now we're going to go to Rick in Texas. Rick, what can we do for you?
[01:11:00.240 --> 01:11:04.240]  Hey, Eddie. How are we? Well, so far, so good.
[01:11:04.240 --> 01:11:12.240]  Well, that's always a positive. I'm about some things off your head and see where it goes. Well, I got to rock for it. Go right ahead. Oh, there you go.
[01:11:12.240 --> 01:11:32.240]  All right. My wife got a DWI in Livingston, and she has panic attacks. So what I want to do is I want to go in and go under special appearance, sue jurists, and by marriage and common law, the husband and wife are one body in law.
[01:11:32.240 --> 01:11:46.240]  And what I want to do is do all this talking for her and make them come up with not going to happen. Number one jurisdiction not going to happen. Rick, not not going to happen.
[01:11:46.240 --> 01:11:59.240]  They they no longer follow any law, but their own and their own has supplanted that with the fact that the only person that can speak for her if it's not herself is an attorney.
[01:11:59.240 --> 01:12:09.240]  Okay. Well, I'm a lawyer, not an attorney. I have not to. No, you're not listening to me. I didn't say a lawyer, did I?
[01:12:09.240 --> 01:12:14.240]  No, sir, you did. Okay. Lawyers don't have to have bar cards.
[01:12:14.240 --> 01:12:27.240]  And the bar card basically is taking an oath to British crime. Not not not. Also, prove that. Show me where any law says that's what happens.
[01:12:27.240 --> 01:12:38.240]  Okay. Okay. Show me where any act says this is what happens when you do this or this is how we created it to work. There isn't one.
[01:12:38.240 --> 01:12:43.240]  Okay. Okay. I'm still listening. All right.
[01:12:43.240 --> 01:13:03.240]  The fact of the matter is there is a license to practice law in Texas, but it's unconstitutionally issued by the Texas Supreme Court per statutory enactments of the legislature, which is unconstitutionally controlled by attorneys who also controlled the courts.
[01:13:03.240 --> 01:13:15.240]  Now, there we have lots of real issues, but the British Accreditation Registry, as far as I know, ain't one of them, and I have never found a shred of proof that says otherwise.
[01:13:15.240 --> 01:13:31.240]  No matter how many times and how many people I've asked to produce their factual admissible evidence of that assertion, no one's done so. In fact, I cannot find where even the British defined British Accreditation Registry.
[01:13:31.240 --> 01:13:36.240]  Okay. Well, I've heard that the British Accreditation...
[01:13:36.240 --> 01:13:45.240]  Okay. Let me tell you what I say that stands for in the patronet world. Blow hard and retard.
[01:13:45.240 --> 01:13:46.240]  That's a good one.
[01:13:46.240 --> 01:13:58.240]  Okay, because that is exactly what that assertion is when you can't offer any significant information that would even give that as a possibility.
[01:13:58.240 --> 01:14:08.240]  Okay. Now, what about the fact, okay, if I give her a written statement that I can put together for her to read in front of the judge, basically...
[01:14:08.240 --> 01:14:10.240]  What kind of statement?
[01:14:10.240 --> 01:14:13.240]  Okay. Well, not a statement, actually a notice.
[01:14:13.240 --> 01:14:15.240]  What kind of notice?
[01:14:15.240 --> 01:14:22.240]  A notice stating there is no jurisdiction, no corpus delecti, and no habeas corpus.
[01:14:22.240 --> 01:14:25.240]  Okay. You're forgetting one little thing here.
[01:14:25.240 --> 01:14:27.240]  Okay, I'm listening.
[01:14:27.240 --> 01:14:35.240]  The common law is not absolute in a requirement of a harmed party. You know why?
[01:14:35.240 --> 01:14:37.240]  Right, but there has to be a corpus...
[01:14:37.240 --> 01:14:42.240]  No, no, no, that's what, that's the body of the crime. That's what you're asking for, a victim.
[01:14:42.240 --> 01:14:43.240]  Right.
[01:14:43.240 --> 01:14:54.240]  That's not true. And here's why. The common law recognizes criminal negligence.
[01:14:54.240 --> 01:15:11.240]  In other words, an act so egregiously irresponsible that the likelihood of harm to another or their property far exceeded the likelihood of not resulting in a harm, like firing a gun into a crowd.
[01:15:11.240 --> 01:15:25.240]  Doesn't matter if you hit anyone or not. The act itself was so egregious and negligent in its action that it's criminal. Got it?
[01:15:25.240 --> 01:15:26.240]  Okay.
[01:15:26.240 --> 01:15:34.240]  Now, that will be, I guarantee you that will be an argument that will be attached to DUI.
[01:15:34.240 --> 01:15:42.240]  Okay. Where I'm left is, okay, there's no corpus delecti, no body, no injured party.
[01:15:42.240 --> 01:15:44.240]  Okay. Let me make a suggestion.
[01:15:44.240 --> 01:15:45.240]  Okay.
[01:15:45.240 --> 01:15:49.240]  How did they encounter her from the get-go?
[01:15:49.240 --> 01:16:00.240]  She was lost and driving slow, driving like 20 miles under the speed limit, looking for road signs. And they pulled her...
[01:16:00.240 --> 01:16:14.240]  Okay. Well, here's my question. Let me do this as we go. When you say she was driving 20 miles an hour looking for a road sign, please tell me it was in a neighborhood and not the interstate.
[01:16:14.240 --> 01:16:19.240]  No, it was not the interstate. It was back roads. This is Livingston. And if you've been in Livingston...
[01:16:19.240 --> 01:16:23.240]  I have, but I just need to make sure of where we're talking about here.
[01:16:23.240 --> 01:16:30.240]  World roads, looking for road signs. Okay. So what was criminal about that? Not a thing.
[01:16:30.240 --> 01:16:38.240]  Okay. What did they add to that? Think about that while we're on break here. We'll be right back in just about 45 seconds or so.
[01:16:38.240 --> 01:16:47.240]  But think about what else they attached to her driving slow to give them their so-called probable cause to make a stop.
[01:16:47.240 --> 01:16:55.240]  Hang on just a second and I'll be right back after the break. Folks, 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:17:17.240 --> 01:17:23.240] ...making contributions every year on our annual fundraisers, which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:17:23.240 --> 01:17:27.240]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution.
[01:17:27.240 --> 01:17:32.240]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks.
[01:17:32.240 --> 01:17:37.240]  First prize being a Spikes Skull Lower Receiver. Second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[01:17:37.240 --> 01:17:39.240]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor.
[01:17:39.240 --> 01:17:45.240]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud.
[01:17:45.240 --> 01:17:50.240]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[01:17:50.240 --> 01:17:52.240]  The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser.
[01:17:52.240 --> 01:17:58.240]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:18:00.240 --> 01:18:06.240]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.240 --> 01:18:11.240]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.240 --> 01:18:17.240]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.240 --> 01:18:25.240]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.240 --> 01:18:31.240]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.240 --> 01:18:39.240]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:39.240 --> 01:18:47.240]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.240 --> 01:18:51.240]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:51.240 --> 01:18:58.240]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:58.240 --> 01:19:00.240]  Order now.
[01:19:00.240 --> 01:19:10.240]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.240 --> 01:19:49.240]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:49.240 --> 01:19:53.240]  Rule of Law Radio with your host Eddie Craig, and we are talking with Rick in Texas.
[01:19:53.240 --> 01:20:02.240]  Alright, now, in addition to her driving slow, what else did they say gave them probable cause to stop her?
[01:20:02.240 --> 01:20:13.240]  Just the driving slow. When she did pull over and rolled down her window, they automatically said they smelled alcohol on her breath and got her out of the car.
[01:20:13.240 --> 01:20:18.240]  Then they took her, licensed the whole shebang, arrested her and...
[01:20:18.240 --> 01:20:23.240]  Wait a minute, they didn't do any field sobriety tests or anything of that nature?
[01:20:23.240 --> 01:20:30.240]  I believe she did a field sobriety test when they got her out of the car and then automatically arrested her because they said,
[01:20:30.240 --> 01:20:38.240]  which, you know, the field sobriety tests are just set up to, you know, the monkey tricks, the whole shebang to make you look like a fool.
[01:20:38.240 --> 01:20:42.240]  You're never going to win against doing that. I know that personally.
[01:20:42.240 --> 01:20:50.240]  Okay, the words you're actually looking for is subjective. That's what the field sobriety tests are. They are subjective.
[01:20:50.240 --> 01:20:56.240]  You never, ever take a field sobriety test.
[01:20:56.240 --> 01:20:57.240]  Absolutely not.
[01:20:57.240 --> 01:20:58.240]  Okay.
[01:20:58.240 --> 01:20:59.240]  Absolutely not.
[01:20:59.240 --> 01:21:07.240]  What you do instead is say, I will be more than happy to take your test upon advice from my assistance of counsel.
[01:21:07.240 --> 01:21:12.240]  Don't ever refuse because refusal can be used against you.
[01:21:12.240 --> 01:21:21.240]  But to simply say, I'll happily take your test once I've had a chance to confer with my legal counsel and seek legal advice.
[01:21:21.240 --> 01:21:30.240]  And then you call your brother-in-law telling him you're not going to be home for a week and hang up and just say, all right, I'm waiting on my legal counsel.
[01:21:30.240 --> 01:21:31.240]  Right.
[01:21:31.240 --> 01:21:39.240]  Okay. It's really that simple. Don't ever refuse, but don't do the test anyway.
[01:21:39.240 --> 01:21:40.240]  I'll do the test.
[01:21:40.240 --> 01:21:41.240]  She did the test.
[01:21:41.240 --> 01:21:47.240]  Right. She did the test. And then she also, when they took her in, they did a forced blood.
[01:21:47.240 --> 01:21:49.240]  Did they get a warrant?
[01:21:49.240 --> 01:22:01.240]  I believe for what she did. Now, this all went down before we were married and before I could legally or lawfully advise her on how to deal with the traffic.
[01:22:01.240 --> 01:22:02.240]  Okay. That's not my question.
[01:22:02.240 --> 01:22:08.240]  Right. She said that they did. Now, whether that's true...
[01:22:08.240 --> 01:22:09.240]  Did they give her a copy of it?
[01:22:09.240 --> 01:22:15.240]  I haven't seen, I have not seen any of Discovery. I have asked for the Discovery.
[01:22:15.240 --> 01:22:18.240]  Why are you asking for Discovery? Where's the damned warrant?
[01:22:18.240 --> 01:22:26.240]  Right. Okay. I don't know anything about the warrant or I have no, I'm just going on what...
[01:22:26.240 --> 01:22:32.240]  The warrant is public record. It is filed in the court record the moment that the warrant is executed.
[01:22:32.240 --> 01:22:33.240]  Okay.
[01:22:33.240 --> 01:22:40.240]  It must be filed by the clerk of the court in the adjudicatory file of the court, which is 100% public record.
[01:22:40.240 --> 01:22:53.240]  Okay. So I'm going to get a check for warrants. Okay. All right. So I got to find it.
[01:22:53.240 --> 01:23:07.240]  Now, the issue here becomes the initial stop. If her going slow and there was not a minimum speed limit requirement on that stretch of road that she was on, like there is on the interstate...
[01:23:07.240 --> 01:23:09.240]  Right. So that would lead to...
[01:23:09.240 --> 01:23:26.240]  They would not have had probable cause based solely upon the fact that she was going slow, nor can they say that going slow gave them reasonable suspicion in order to make the stop that she was actually inebriated.
[01:23:26.240 --> 01:23:42.240]  And here's why. Because in Texas, a traffic stop is an arrest. It is not a detention. Okay. Correct. In order to do that, they would have to have probable cause, not reasonable suspicion.
[01:23:42.240 --> 01:23:45.240]  Right. Which are two different things altogether.
[01:23:45.240 --> 01:24:09.240]  Correct. So the issue here becomes an unlawful stop because there was no articulable probable cause, and they couldn't use reasonable suspicion because it was a custodial arrest without a warrant. Therefore, probable cause was required, thus making anything they discovered fruit of the poison tree.
[01:24:09.240 --> 01:24:12.240]  Fruit of the poison tree. Where would I find that? I haven't seen that.
[01:24:12.240 --> 01:24:25.240]  You need to go to my blog site and read the articles that I mentioned up toward the beginning of this show dealing with no probable cause, fighting the complaint, and the fruit of the poison tree doctrine.
[01:24:25.240 --> 01:24:35.240]  All those are in articles on my blog. The blog is tauoflaw.wordpress.com.
[01:24:35.240 --> 01:24:43.240]  Okay. Well, I was hoping I could actually speak for her because she gets real nervous when she has to get in front of a lawyer.
[01:24:43.240 --> 01:24:44.240]  No.
[01:24:44.240 --> 01:24:48.240]  Or an attorney or a judge, and she gets real flustered real easy.
[01:24:48.240 --> 01:24:53.240]  No. And if she puts her fate in the hands of an attorney, she's as good as gone.
[01:24:53.240 --> 01:24:57.240]  Right. And that's what scares me.
[01:24:57.240 --> 01:25:04.240]  Oh, it shouldn't scare you what they're going to do. They're not going to throw her in jail. They're going to take all your money.
[01:25:04.240 --> 01:25:05.240]  Right.
[01:25:05.240 --> 01:25:14.240]  They're going to put her on probation for X years. They're going to make you pay for all these things to put in your car, the ignition switch tester and all that stuff.
[01:25:14.240 --> 01:25:20.240]  Right. I already put up $15,000 cash bond to get her out.
[01:25:20.240 --> 01:25:25.240]  So, trust me, it's already costing some money.
[01:25:25.240 --> 01:25:34.240]  That was what I was looking at. And as going in and saying you're here by special appearance, I was believing that would put it into a common law jurisdiction.
[01:25:34.240 --> 01:25:40.240]  No, it does not. Special appearance is there for the purpose of challenging the jurisdiction of the court.
[01:25:40.240 --> 01:25:50.240]  So, you do special appearance for that purpose, but it doesn't change anything about the court. It changes your status of appearance. That's what it does.
[01:25:50.240 --> 01:26:01.240]  It takes it from a category of general in which you waive in personal jurisdiction to special in which you retain the right to challenge jurisdiction.
[01:26:01.240 --> 01:26:08.240]  Correct. Okay. I'm aware of what you're saying. And we're definitely going to go in and state special appearance.
[01:26:08.240 --> 01:26:24.240]  Don't go in and state anything. Everything you do in court should be done in writing. Everything you do in writing should be verbally argued in its entirety or not at all.
[01:26:24.240 --> 01:26:30.240]  But you do everything in writing. That is how you make your record.
[01:26:30.240 --> 01:26:34.240]  Right. And on top of that, get it notarized and certified.
[01:26:34.240 --> 01:26:43.240]  You filed everything, verified pleadings, as long as you can make sure that everything you assert is a true and correct fact. Otherwise, you're going to get charged with perjury, too.
[01:26:43.240 --> 01:26:47.240]  Right. That's the whole thing with an affidavit, correct?
[01:26:47.240 --> 01:26:51.240]  That's the whole thing with signing under penalty a perjury, regardless of what it is.
[01:26:51.240 --> 01:26:56.240]  Right. Okay. But we definitely want to squash this as soon as possible.
[01:26:56.240 --> 01:27:04.240]  Squash. Not squash. This is not a game you play with a racket and a ball. It's squash.
[01:27:04.240 --> 01:27:14.240]  Right. All right. Well, you opened my eyes. Like I said, the thing I was looking at was hoping to do it and go in as a coverture.
[01:27:14.240 --> 01:27:20.240]  And that was, you know, that was old common law where the husband could actually even...
[01:27:20.240 --> 01:27:33.240]  No, you can act as her assistant. The judge can't prevent you from being up there with her. The judge can't prevent her from conversing with you and seeking counsel from you, but you cannot speak for her.
[01:27:33.240 --> 01:27:41.240]  Okay. Now, the judge will try to prevent you from going up there. But legally speaking, he can't do it.
[01:27:41.240 --> 01:27:46.240]  Okay. Lawfully, he can't. Legally, he's going to try, but lawfully, he can't.
[01:27:46.240 --> 01:28:01.240]  Correct. Okay. That's what I need to know. So I'm going to state my presence and I will stand beside her and go from there because, you know, she's going to need my confidence.
[01:28:01.240 --> 01:28:04.240]  Yeah. Most definitely needs my confidence.
[01:28:04.240 --> 01:28:18.240]  Well, if you're going to go up there and sit with her, get the patronut feed bag off your face first. Okay. Figure out how this works the correct way and learn it.
[01:28:18.240 --> 01:28:26.240]  Okay. But stop looking for an easy silver bullet solution. There isn't one.
[01:28:26.240 --> 01:28:38.240]  I'll definitely get in my research and then see what, and I don't want to file motions because motions are begging from what I understand. Excuse me, I don't want to even use the word understand.
[01:28:38.240 --> 01:28:46.240]  There you go again. See, you're still, you're still chomping down on the patronut oats.
[01:28:46.240 --> 01:28:57.240]  Okay. Definitely. That's well, that's how they, that's how they get an admission and admission of understanding does not do what the patronuts say that makes you stand under anything.
[01:28:57.240 --> 01:29:10.240]  Okay. Okay. But the deal is, is that you don't understand. You can't understand because they're talking in legalese and you're not one of them trained to understand it.
[01:29:10.240 --> 01:29:19.240]  Right. They're going to try to say you need to get an attorney to understand it for you. You need to reject that process. Okay.
[01:29:19.240 --> 01:29:26.240]  Right. And that's, that's what they're going to try to do is, is make us get an attorney. We don't want to do that.
[01:29:26.240 --> 01:29:37.240]  She could stand up there all day and say, judge, I don't understand anything you're saying to me. No one was harmed. There was absolutely no evidence for these officers to pull me over with from the get go.
[01:29:37.240 --> 01:29:47.240]  I don't understand how any of this can be. Well, you understand you did such and such. No judge. I don't understand any such thing. That's your opinion and presumption. That's not factual.
[01:29:47.240 --> 01:30:02.240]  Well, what are the facts? Well, I'm sorry. It's not my burden of proof. I don't have to answer that. See how this works. Hang on. We'll be right back. Certainly.
[01:30:02.240 --> 01:30:11.240]  Did you know the majority of businesses in the U.S. are family owned? We're not just talking mom and pop stores, but companies at the very top of the corporate ladder.
[01:30:11.240 --> 01:30:15.240]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht back with the top family businesses next.
[01:30:15.240 --> 01:30:26.240]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:26.240 --> 01:30:34.240]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.240 --> 01:30:45.240]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.240 --> 01:30:52.240]  When it comes to business, blood and money really do mix. A whopping eight out of ten American businesses are family owned.
[01:30:52.240 --> 01:30:58.240]  They contribute nearly 60 percent of the nation's economy and employ nearly two-thirds of the U.S. workforce.
[01:30:58.240 --> 01:31:07.240]  Many of the firms in the S&P 500 are family controlled and they're doing great. They're more stable and they inspire more commitment and trust in their employees.
[01:31:07.240 --> 01:31:17.240]  The biggest family owned business is, surprise, Walmart. Next comes Ford, Cargill, Coke Industries, Carlson Companies, Comcast and News Corp.
[01:31:17.240 --> 01:31:22.240]  Rounding out the top ten is the sweetest of them all, Mars. M&M's anyone?
[01:31:22.240 --> 01:31:30.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:30.240 --> 01:31:36.240]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.240 --> 01:31:43.240]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.240 --> 01:31:49.240]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.240 --> 01:31:55.240]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.240 --> 01:32:01.240]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.240 --> 01:32:06.240]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.240 --> 01:32:11.240]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chem trails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.240 --> 01:32:15.240]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chem trails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.240 --> 01:32:21.240]  That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.240 --> 01:32:27.240]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.240 --> 01:32:32.240]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.240 --> 01:32:39.240]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.240 --> 01:32:46.240]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.240 --> 01:32:51.240]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:51.240 --> 01:32:59.240]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.240 --> 01:33:02.240]  May not actually be kidding about chem trails.
[01:33:02.240 --> 01:33:11.240]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:32.240 --> 01:33:43.240]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:33:43.240 --> 01:33:53.240]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:33:53.240 --> 01:34:17.240]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:34:17.240 --> 01:34:25.240]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:34:25.240 --> 01:34:29.240]  And I've got a half an hour left in this show, and we're still talking with Rick in Texas.
[01:34:29.240 --> 01:34:32.240]  All right, Rick, anything else you need to know about that?
[01:34:32.240 --> 01:34:39.240]  Oh, no, I'm just going to add a little something. I have not had a driver's license since 2002.
[01:34:39.240 --> 01:34:48.240]  My Escalade, my Mercedes 500 SL, and my Z71 all have plates that state, don't tread on me.
[01:34:48.240 --> 01:34:53.240]  I've only been arrested one time since I've listened to your program.
[01:34:53.240 --> 01:34:56.240]  Well, good. Glad it's been useful.
[01:34:56.240 --> 01:35:02.240]  It has been useful, and I first caught up with your program quite some time ago.
[01:35:02.240 --> 01:35:10.240]  And as a matter of fact, I actually was looking at doing an interview with myself on Alex Jones at one time.
[01:35:10.240 --> 01:35:13.240]  Well, cool.
[01:35:13.240 --> 01:35:17.240]  So anyway, just letting you know thank you, and it's been a pleasure speaking with you.
[01:35:17.240 --> 01:35:20.240]  All right, Rick, same here. You have a good night and good luck.
[01:35:20.240 --> 01:35:22.240]  You do the same.
[01:35:22.240 --> 01:35:28.240]  All right, now we're going to go to Patricia in Nevada. Patricia, what can we do for you?
[01:35:28.240 --> 01:35:31.240]  Well, Eddie, good evening. Thank you so much for taking my call.
[01:35:31.240 --> 01:35:35.240]  Yes, ma'am. Sorry to make you wait so long. It's just the way it goes sometimes.
[01:35:35.240 --> 01:35:40.240]  Oh, no problem. I've been enjoying the show, and I had a great conversation with Scott earlier, so it's all good.
[01:35:40.240 --> 01:35:41.240]  All right.
[01:35:41.240 --> 01:35:46.240]  I've got two things I want to discuss. One thing is a speeding ticket, and I'll get to that.
[01:35:46.240 --> 01:35:51.240]  But I wanted to make a comment on your opening monologue because you asked people to call about that.
[01:35:51.240 --> 01:35:52.240]  All right.
[01:35:52.240 --> 01:36:00.240]  There's a YouTube video that I think is just excellent. It's of an old show from the 1950s, a conservative news magazine.
[01:36:00.240 --> 01:36:06.240]  It was called the Longines Chronoscope from the Longines Watchmakers.
[01:36:06.240 --> 01:36:15.240]  And they were interviewing a representative from New York by the name of Keating, not the same savings and loan Keating,
[01:36:15.240 --> 01:36:23.240]  but a congressman who was actually investigating the Department of Justice that was on the subcommittee that he was on.
[01:36:23.240 --> 01:36:26.240]  And so they finally said to him at one point, they said,
[01:36:26.240 --> 01:36:35.240]  well, isn't it true that in order for a totalitarian regime to gain a foothold, they have to take over the Department of Justice first?
[01:36:35.240 --> 01:36:43.240]  And the congressman said, oh, yes, they have to take over the Department of Justice and the police because they need to be able to control the interior.
[01:36:43.240 --> 01:36:50.240]  And then they both backpedaled and said, well, you know, that's not what I'm not saying that's happening, but that's what they would have to do.
[01:36:50.240 --> 01:36:53.240]  Oh, yes, I'm not saying that's happening, but that's what they would have to do.
[01:36:53.240 --> 01:36:57.240]  Yeah, but we can see that that's exactly what's happening.
[01:36:57.240 --> 01:37:03.240]  Exactly. And they did it very well. And it's been going on since the 50s with, you know, gradualism.
[01:37:03.240 --> 01:37:10.240]  And it's the Department of Injustice now. It is Bolshevik America, in my opinion.
[01:37:10.240 --> 01:37:14.240]  Yeah, the Department of Just Us.
[01:37:14.240 --> 01:37:16.240]  Yeah, that's right. That's right.
[01:37:16.240 --> 01:37:25.240]  And the travesties that I've seen to that, I'm actually here in Nevada and work pretty strong on the Bundy cases, both the Oregon and the Nevada one.
[01:37:25.240 --> 01:37:32.240]  And just fascinating what they're getting away with. So, yeah, the totalitarian regime.
[01:37:32.240 --> 01:37:42.240]  Yeah, the thing is, the Bundys could get out of that very easily by challenging the jurisdiction of the federal court because the BLM had no jurisdiction on the land in the first place.
[01:37:42.240 --> 01:37:53.240]  If that land is not specifically ceded to the federal government through sale or cession by the states, they have no authority over it, period.
[01:37:53.240 --> 01:38:08.240]  Well, in Clark County was when it was brought into Nevada, because the area here in Nevada where we live wasn't part of the original statehood, but they don't seem to recognize statehood.
[01:38:08.240 --> 01:38:21.240]  They still treat us like a territory. And it's pretty interesting that the IRS in the cases with Hawaii and Alaska, and I just shared this, I think, a little while ago with Scott,
[01:38:21.240 --> 01:38:32.240]  but they used the word state before they came in, you know, had statehood, and then went back to territory and territory of Hawaii, territory of Alaska, after statehood.
[01:38:32.240 --> 01:38:43.240]  So like here in the West, we don't seem to have real statehood. So this will be a great case. I think it's going to be that the trials, these two trials will be the trials of the century.
[01:38:43.240 --> 01:38:49.240]  Well, maybe it'd be a good one for Jerry Spence to take 30 years off his life and come back to.
[01:38:49.240 --> 01:38:57.240]  Yeah, well, you know, Jerry, Jerry's an interesting guy. I hear he was great with the jury, but I'm not sure if I agree with his politics.
[01:38:57.240 --> 01:39:09.240]  But so I'm hoping that Larry Klayman can finally get on this. I know he's working on it, but the judge is refusing his pro-Hawk BJ status, you know, just because she's corrupt.
[01:39:09.240 --> 01:39:20.240]  She's been appointed by Harry Reid and what have you. And they've actually filed a Bivens complaint against her, Harry Reid and Rory Reid and somebody named Barack Obama.
[01:39:20.240 --> 01:39:28.240]  But of course, it hasn't gone anywhere. I mean, she refuses to recuse herself. She should. I mean, but if it's not her, it'll be someone else.
[01:39:28.240 --> 01:39:31.240]  He should have been named Barack Obama movement.
[01:39:31.240 --> 01:39:41.240]  Yeah. Yeah, you're right there. But they're all in it thick as thieves. And the same thing with the Oregon case.
[01:39:41.240 --> 01:39:56.240]  Yeah. Well, it's not surprising to me that the most corrupt politician trying to steal the land in that area of the world would have the case heard by a judge that he helped get appointed to ensure that he could steal the land in that area of the world.
[01:39:56.240 --> 01:40:13.240]  Absolutely. And the fact that the BLM is the director of the BLM is Neil Cornsey, who is a former aide for Harry Reid, worked in his office for years and that Harry Reid appointed him to be head of the BLM. This is all very cozy, very sleazy.
[01:40:13.240 --> 01:40:33.240]  And Harry Reid owns the parcels of land around the Bundy Ranch and the BLM owns one of the parcels. So it's absolutely incredible that they're getting away with it this long and actually have these men in jail pre-trial and saying that they're dangerous to the community.
[01:40:33.240 --> 01:40:44.240]  And what I say is, well, if there's such a danger to the community, why the hell did you leave them on the street for two years? How many agents have they killed? How many people have they hired?
[01:40:44.240 --> 01:40:50.240]  Well, that may not be the particular wording or the arguments the way you want to use it, but I get the idea.
[01:40:50.240 --> 01:41:05.240]  Yeah, well, exactly. They haven't harmed any of them. As a matter of fact, several of those men were able to get concealed carry permits and stuff in these last two years. So they haven't been a harm or a danger. It's all just a trumped up kangaroo court nightmare that they're going through.
[01:41:05.240 --> 01:41:23.240]  But hopefully they'll get some really strong arguments going here about Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, and be able to prove that the federal government's been pulling the wool over their eyes since 1864.
[01:41:23.240 --> 01:41:36.240]  So it's an interesting thing. But my personal thing is tonight, Eddie, since you're an expert, I remember seeing your video on the traffic stop or transportation stop, as you call it, several years ago.
[01:41:36.240 --> 01:41:53.240]  I wound up in this, and I didn't keep—as a matter of fact, I didn't see your questionnaire that you had. So I had a speeding ticket here a couple weeks ago on my own street, and I knew it was a speed trap that they set up there.
[01:41:53.240 --> 01:42:06.240]  The other two streets get way more speeding on it, but they wanted to have easy pickings here. And so a motorcycle cop stopped me, and I didn't handle it quite right because I was driving a car with dealer plates.
[01:42:06.240 --> 01:42:16.240]  I wasn't driving. I was traveling in a car with dealer plates, and so I wasn't quite sure since I'd just started doing that, you know, what the fine line distinction was there.
[01:42:16.240 --> 01:42:24.240]  Apparently, it's not. I asked them if this was a commercial vehicle, and they said no. And so we had an interesting stop. The man—
[01:42:24.240 --> 01:42:39.240]  Well, you have one other thing in your benefit here, real quick, and that is that unless I'm mistaken, Nevada is civil infraction state. I could be wrong, but I think it is.
[01:42:39.240 --> 01:42:49.240]  I'm not sure because I'm looking for some law, and when I looked up how they define, you know, vehicle, driver, all that, there's no definition for transportation.
[01:42:49.240 --> 01:42:57.240]  No, they're—okay. Like I told the caller earlier in the show, the code will not define it. That's exactly the point.
[01:42:57.240 --> 01:43:00.240]  Yeah, exactly the point because they want to hide what it really is.
[01:43:00.240 --> 01:43:14.240]  Well, not only do they want to hide what it really is, but they really didn't want to change what it really is. They wanted you to assume what it was, and then they couldn't be blamed for what you assumed.
[01:43:14.240 --> 01:43:15.240]  Exactly.
[01:43:15.240 --> 01:43:16.240]  Okay.
[01:43:16.240 --> 01:43:22.240]  So I made the mistake of giving him my driver's license, but I felt like I was under stress and duress to do that.
[01:43:22.240 --> 01:43:30.240]  And then they asked for the other paperwork, which I didn't have with me, but the company faxed it to me the following day.
[01:43:30.240 --> 01:43:36.240]  But the interesting thing that he said to me is he asked me—he was on the passenger side of the car.
[01:43:36.240 --> 01:43:38.240]  I hear you having a break.
[01:43:38.240 --> 01:43:42.240]  Yeah, we got a break, so hang on just a second, and we'll pick this up on the other side, okay?
[01:43:42.240 --> 01:43:43.240]  Sure, thanks.
[01:43:43.240 --> 01:43:45.240]  All right, we'll be right back.
[01:43:45.240 --> 01:43:52.240]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. We are coming into the last segment of the show, so y'all hang in there, and I'll try to finish up the callers I got.
[01:43:52.240 --> 01:44:00.240]  And we'll be right back after the break, so y'all don't go anywhere.
[01:44:00.240 --> 01:44:03.240]  Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:03.240 --> 01:44:04.240]  Boring!
[01:44:04.240 --> 01:44:07.240]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.240 --> 01:44:08.240]  What?
[01:44:08.240 --> 01:44:12.240]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today—stupidity.
[01:44:12.240 --> 01:44:18.240]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:18.240 --> 01:44:24.240]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America—the television.
[01:44:24.240 --> 01:44:29.240]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:29.240 --> 01:44:35.240]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:35.240 --> 01:44:42.240]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:42.240 --> 01:44:54.240]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.240 --> 01:45:00.240]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:00.240 --> 01:45:03.240]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.240 --> 01:45:14.240]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.240 --> 01:45:22.240]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.240 --> 01:45:27.240]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.240 --> 01:45:34.240]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.240 --> 01:45:43.240]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.240 --> 01:45:52.240]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.240 --> 01:46:01.240]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.240 --> 01:46:47.240]  Alright folks, we are back and we are still talking with Patricia in Nevada. Alright, Patricia, let's get you going here.
[01:46:47.240 --> 01:46:56.240]  Alright, Eddie, so he asked me at one point if he can open the door on his side, and I said, I'd prefer that you didn't.
[01:46:56.240 --> 01:47:05.240]  He said, well, I need to get the VIN number, and I said, well, it's right over here, and I pointed to the side of the glass where it's kept on that side of the car.
[01:47:05.240 --> 01:47:10.240]  And he said, well, I need to do this, and I said, well, I'd prefer you didn't open the door.
[01:47:10.240 --> 01:47:17.240]  And he said, well, do you want me to just open it and pull you out of there?
[01:47:17.240 --> 01:47:20.240]  And I go, what a creep. Yeah. And so...
[01:47:20.240 --> 01:47:26.240]  Do you want me to charge you with aggravated assault for entering my car without my consent or a warrant?
[01:47:26.240 --> 01:47:29.240]  You can get the VIN number through the windshield over here, just like I told you.
[01:47:29.240 --> 01:47:36.240]  The whole reason it's designed that way is so you can read it through the windshield without having to get inside the car.
[01:47:36.240 --> 01:47:40.240]  Yeah, I'm writing a letter to the mayor and to the police chief.
[01:47:40.240 --> 01:47:45.240]  Don't just write a letter. Go down to Internal Affairs and file charges.
[01:47:45.240 --> 01:47:50.240]  Oh, okay. All right. So...
[01:47:50.240 --> 01:47:59.240]  You have to remember, these are armed individuals committing harassment and threats of violence while displaying a deadly weapon.
[01:47:59.240 --> 01:48:05.240]  That's aggravated assault in any state of the union.
[01:48:05.240 --> 01:48:07.240]  That's a felony.
[01:48:07.240 --> 01:48:10.240]  I felt threatened.
[01:48:10.240 --> 01:48:13.240]  Absolutely. Who wouldn't?
[01:48:13.240 --> 01:48:16.240]  Yeah, who wouldn't?
[01:48:16.240 --> 01:48:23.240]  And so, yeah, I had a conversation with them. I asked them if I'd harmed anybody, if I'd harmed anyone's property.
[01:48:23.240 --> 01:48:28.240]  He said no, no. Then he had to call his buddy to come get the VIN number, and then they would give me a...
[01:48:28.240 --> 01:48:37.240]  It was just ugly. And then they print out the ticket, and they want me to sign this computer. They hand me the ticket and they want me to sign this computerized thing.
[01:48:37.240 --> 01:48:41.240]  I said, no, I don't sign anything without talking to my attorney.
[01:48:41.240 --> 01:48:44.240]  And they said, no, you have to sign it. And I go, no, I don't. I don't sign.
[01:48:44.240 --> 01:48:52.240]  And they said, if you don't sign it, we're going to issue a warrant for your arrest.
[01:48:52.240 --> 01:48:59.240]  Again, terroristic threat. Do they actually have the authority to issue a warrant if you don't sign?
[01:48:59.240 --> 01:49:02.240]  Yeah, that's what I want to know.
[01:49:02.240 --> 01:49:14.240]  I guess my question is, I debated whether to just pay the stupid ticket because they'll plea it down to a non-moving site and keep it off, or do I go to court and have some fun with these clowns?
[01:49:14.240 --> 01:49:29.240]  If you can find authority that says that it was not criminal in the first place, that it's a civil infraction, not a criminal misdemeanor, then absolutely. The entire stop was absolutely illegal.
[01:49:29.240 --> 01:49:40.240]  No, I think it's a misdemeanor because the attorney that does traffic with this firm, she says that what will go on my record is a misdemeanor if I lose the trial.
[01:49:40.240 --> 01:49:47.240]  Don't trust an attorney to tell you squat, especially the one prosecuting you.
[01:49:47.240 --> 01:49:49.240]  No, no, she's not prosecuting me.
[01:49:49.240 --> 01:49:52.240]  Wanna bet?
[01:49:52.240 --> 01:49:54.240]  Oh.
[01:49:54.240 --> 01:50:01.240]  Even the one you hire as your counsel is going to prosecute you.
[01:50:01.240 --> 01:50:02.240]  That's true.
[01:50:02.240 --> 01:50:12.240]  Okay, you're not going to get an attorney who depends upon these cases for part of their income to tell you the truth about how they can be handled without them.
[01:50:12.240 --> 01:50:17.240]  No, no, she's good with it. She actually works for one of those prepaid law firms, Legal Shield.
[01:50:17.240 --> 01:50:18.240]  Okay.
[01:50:18.240 --> 01:50:28.240]  She actually wants to see me do this and go to court. She's worried because she has to be there several days a week or so, four or five times a week.
[01:50:28.240 --> 01:50:35.240]  But she'll be there as a citizen's counsel for me if I want and watch this happen. She really wants to see someone do this.
[01:50:35.240 --> 01:50:36.240]  Okay.
[01:50:36.240 --> 01:50:41.240]  Well, what you need to talk to her then and ask her to check out is this.
[01:50:41.240 --> 01:50:47.240]  How can the officer establish probable cause for a malum prohibitum act?
[01:50:47.240 --> 01:50:57.240]  Considering that the primary element that they would have to prove is that you were engaging in the regulated activity of whatever that code is.
[01:50:57.240 --> 01:51:02.240]  For instance, here in Texas, it's the transportation code. Is that what it is in Nevada?
[01:51:02.240 --> 01:51:06.240]  No, it's in Nevada Revised Statutes, Rules of the Road.
[01:51:06.240 --> 01:51:16.240]  Yeah, but is it? No. Rules of the Road will be part of the overall code as far as regulating a particular subject matter. It won't be separate and apart.
[01:51:16.240 --> 01:51:23.240]  The subject matter is either going to be the motor vehicle code or the transportation code.
[01:51:23.240 --> 01:51:30.240]  Okay. And that Rules of the Road will be within the sectors that deal with that subject matter.
[01:51:30.240 --> 01:51:33.240]  Okay. All right.
[01:51:33.240 --> 01:51:47.240]  All the law dogs that I listen to on this, like you guys in Texas and someone else in California, they got tons of appellate in state Supreme Court rulings on this.
[01:51:47.240 --> 01:51:55.240]  And so I'm just and I haven't. Okay. But if you read them, you'll understand what they're actually saying versus what they don't.
[01:51:55.240 --> 01:52:03.240]  Ninety nine percent of those cases where it appears that we're being ruled against, you have to understand what they're actually doing with their phrasing.
[01:52:03.240 --> 01:52:13.240]  They are using the same term terminology that relates to the regulated subject matter like vehicle driver operator.
[01:52:13.240 --> 01:52:22.240]  In other words, they're trying to put you into those legal capacities despite the fact that there is no admissible evidence that does so.
[01:52:22.240 --> 01:52:35.240]  They are convicting you based upon an unsubstantiated presumption because you didn't challenge it or because you waive that challenge and admitted to it by doing something yourself,
[01:52:35.240 --> 01:52:42.240]  such as producing a license registration or proof of financial responsibility on demand.
[01:52:42.240 --> 01:52:48.240]  You get it or using that same terminology as to your own activity.
[01:52:48.240 --> 01:52:54.240]  Yeah, yeah, I know. I was driving down the street, officer. Why did you stop by vehicle? You hung yourself right there.
[01:52:54.240 --> 01:53:01.240]  I never used the word. I never used the word drive. I told him that I wasn't a driver. I was not driving in that. I was not.
[01:53:01.240 --> 01:53:04.240]  Okay. What did you call your car?
[01:53:04.240 --> 01:53:06.240]  I think I just called it a car.
[01:53:06.240 --> 01:53:12.240]  Okay. Either way, did you produce a license registration or proof of financial responsibility?
[01:53:12.240 --> 01:53:15.240]  I only produced the driver's license.
[01:53:15.240 --> 01:53:20.240]  Ding, ding, ding. You don't have to produce them all. You only got to produce one.
[01:53:20.240 --> 01:53:23.240]  Okay, so I should just go ahead and pay it since I produced it.
[01:53:23.240 --> 01:53:32.240]  No, I didn't say that. But what you do by doing that is you create the prima facie appearance that that license is applicable.
[01:53:32.240 --> 01:53:37.240]  And if that license is applicable, the subject matter is applicable, right?
[01:53:37.240 --> 01:53:42.240]  Yeah, but I told him when I gave it to him that I was not traveling in that capacity.
[01:53:42.240 --> 01:53:51.240]  I have a license because at a certain point in time, if I ever have an opportunity to be a driver of something, like I have to drive in any way.
[01:53:51.240 --> 01:53:55.240]  Okay, but you're missing the point. You're missing the point, okay?
[01:53:55.240 --> 01:53:56.240]  All right.
[01:53:56.240 --> 01:54:02.240]  The presumption is created by the production, regardless of the disclaimer you attempt to attach to it.
[01:54:02.240 --> 01:54:08.240]  The only way that would have helped you is if the license potentially had been expired because then it's not a license.
[01:54:08.240 --> 01:54:09.240]  Yeah.
[01:54:09.240 --> 01:54:21.240]  Okay, but the point here is that's where these court opinions manage to get their toe hold to use the language they're using to make it appear as if you're wrong.
[01:54:21.240 --> 01:54:33.240]  99.9% of the time, the person accused did something that put them within the range of that subject matter that allowed the court to write the opinion the way they did it.
[01:54:33.240 --> 01:54:48.240]  No one challenges it properly by saying, look, you have not proven personal jurisdiction because you can't prove a relationship between me and the regulated activity subject matter, subject matter.
[01:54:48.240 --> 01:55:00.240]  If you can't prove that I have a relationship with the regulated subject matter, you can't apply the statutes that apply only to that regulated subject matter to me.
[01:55:00.240 --> 01:55:03.240]  You see the difference there?
[01:55:03.240 --> 01:55:04.240]  Yeah.
[01:55:04.240 --> 01:55:15.240]  That's like charging you with a violation of a commercial fishing statute because you didn't have a license when you bought salmon at Walmart.
[01:55:15.240 --> 01:55:18.240]  Right. I get that.
[01:55:18.240 --> 01:55:22.240]  Here in Nevada revised statutes, it says driver defined.
[01:55:22.240 --> 01:55:26.240]  Why are you defining driver?
[01:55:26.240 --> 01:55:30.240]  What does that have to do with you?
[01:55:30.240 --> 01:55:33.240]  Well, I just wanted to look up what they said it had to do with it.
[01:55:33.240 --> 01:55:35.240]  It doesn't make any difference.
[01:55:35.240 --> 01:55:41.240]  What does driver fall within the subject matter of?
[01:55:41.240 --> 01:55:43.240]  Transportation.
[01:55:43.240 --> 01:55:45.240]  They can go.
[01:55:45.240 --> 01:55:51.240]  So all that matters is, can they prove a relationship between you and transportation?
[01:55:51.240 --> 01:55:56.240]  If they can't, they cannot prove driver.
[01:55:56.240 --> 01:55:59.240]  Going to driver is going to merits.
[01:55:59.240 --> 01:56:05.240]  Going to merits kills the subject matter challenge because you're admitting subject matter.
[01:56:05.240 --> 01:56:06.240]  Okay.
[01:56:06.240 --> 01:56:08.240]  So stick with transportation.
[01:56:08.240 --> 01:56:10.240]  That's what you're telling me.
[01:56:10.240 --> 01:56:13.240]  Does the overall act deals with the regulation of transportation?
[01:56:13.240 --> 01:56:14.240]  Yes.
[01:56:14.240 --> 01:56:20.240]  What you need to do is find the original bills that created your statutes as they exist right now.
[01:56:20.240 --> 01:56:29.240]  The actual original recodification and then trace that back through not only that recodification, but the law that existed prior to it.
[01:56:29.240 --> 01:56:31.240]  Don't just look at the statutes.
[01:56:31.240 --> 01:56:34.240]  Look at the actual legislative bills.
[01:56:34.240 --> 01:56:47.240]  Every state of the union that I'm aware of is required by their state constitution that the legislature put the subject matter of the bill they're creating in the caption of the bill.
[01:56:47.240 --> 01:56:58.240]  And nothing that goes into the body of that bill may be in there if it doesn't have a direct relationship with that subject matter.
[01:56:58.240 --> 01:57:08.240]  So what you've got to find is what the original subject matter of these statutes were intended to apply to is and use that to prove it doesn't exist in this case.
[01:57:08.240 --> 01:57:12.240]  There's no relationship between you and that subject matter.
[01:57:12.240 --> 01:57:20.240]  Yeah, because I'm looking at substituted in revision for and it's given me all the substitutions for all this stuff that they substituted it for.
[01:57:20.240 --> 01:57:23.240]  Yeah, but you're still looking at the statutes.
[01:57:23.240 --> 01:57:26.240]  You're not looking at the underlying bill.
[01:57:26.240 --> 01:57:28.240]  The statute is not the law.
[01:57:28.240 --> 01:57:31.240]  The bill is the law.
[01:57:31.240 --> 01:57:33.240]  OK, the bill is the law.
[01:57:33.240 --> 01:57:34.240]  OK, got it.
[01:57:34.240 --> 01:57:39.240]  OK, so go to your state law library or some university with a law library.
[01:57:39.240 --> 01:57:49.240]  Get somebody knowledgeable to help you and backtrack this to the original act that tells you what the subject matter is.
[01:57:49.240 --> 01:57:50.240]  OK, OK.
[01:57:50.240 --> 01:57:51.240]  Thanks.
[01:57:51.240 --> 01:57:52.240]  All right.
[01:57:52.240 --> 01:57:52.240]  Thank you so much.
[01:57:52.240 --> 01:57:53.240]  All right.
[01:57:53.240 --> 01:57:54.240]  Good luck.
[01:57:54.240 --> 01:57:55.240]  Thanks.
[01:57:55.240 --> 01:57:56.240]  All right, Raider.
[01:57:56.240 --> 01:57:58.240]  Sorry, I wasn't able to get to you before I ran out of time.
[01:57:58.240 --> 01:58:00.240]  You got anything important to tell me?
[01:58:00.240 --> 01:58:01.240]  Send it by email, please.
[01:58:01.240 --> 01:58:03.240]  And I'll get back to you as quick as I can.
[01:58:03.240 --> 01:58:07.240]  Folks, this has been the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:07.240 --> 01:58:12.240]  I want to thank you all so much for listening and please you all have a great week.
[01:58:12.240 --> 01:58:26.240]  Good night and God bless.
[01:58:42.240 --> 01:58:57.240]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.240 --> 01:59:08.240]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.240 --> 01:59:11.240]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.240 --> 01:59:20.240]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.240 --> 01:59:30.240]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.240 --> 01:59:32.240]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.240 --> 01:59:40.240]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.240 --> 01:59:49.240]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.240 --> 01:59:53.240]  Looking for some truth? You found it.
[01:59:53.240 --> 02:00:11.240]  LogosRadioNetwork.com