[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives.
[00:21.000 --> 00:27.000]  Markets for Friday, the 10th of June, 2016, are currently trading with gold at $1,273.54
[00:27.000 --> 00:34.000]  an ounce, silver at $17.32 an ounce, Texas crude at $50.56 a barrel, and Bitcoin seems
[00:34.000 --> 00:43.000]  to be leveling off at $580 U.S. currency.
[00:43.000 --> 00:50.000]  Today in history, the year 1967, the states of Israel, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Egypt
[00:50.000 --> 00:53.000]  end the Six-Day War with assistance from the United Nations.
[00:53.000 --> 00:58.000]  Arab casualties are estimated at around 20,000, while fewer than 1,000 are estimated for
[00:58.000 --> 00:59.000]  Israel.
[00:59.000 --> 01:03.000]  Though the ceasefire wasn't signed until the 11th, the United Arab Republic began their
[01:03.000 --> 01:06.000]  retreat between them and Israel in the Six-Day War.
[01:06.000 --> 01:15.000]  Today in history, in recent news, Brian Armstrong recorded an incident around noon outside the
[01:15.000 --> 01:20.000]  Dallas Lovefield Airport today, where an unidentified man was shot several times right by the
[01:20.000 --> 01:22.000]  entry-exit doorways by the police.
[01:22.000 --> 01:25.000]  Of course, the airport was briefly placed on lockdown.
[01:25.000 --> 01:29.000]  Dallas Assistant Chief of Police Randall Blankenbaker said that a number of people who had been
[01:29.000 --> 01:34.000]  waiting to get through security when the shots went off ran past the TSA workers to get away
[01:34.000 --> 01:37.000]  from the chaos, and this was the reasoning for the lockdown.
[01:37.000 --> 01:41.000]  Apparently, the man who was shot and a woman, the mother of his kids, got in some kind of
[01:41.000 --> 01:46.000]  domestic dispute outside of baggage claims when the man began to use rocks to attack
[01:46.000 --> 01:47.000]  the lady.
[01:47.000 --> 01:50.000]  When she cried for help, the police showed up, and then he allegedly began to charge
[01:50.000 --> 01:53.000]  the police, which led them to firing several rounds at him.
[01:53.000 --> 01:57.000]  Luckily, she wasn't hurt, and the officer that shot the man was placed on leave, as
[01:57.000 --> 02:00.000]  is normal procedure following any shooting.
[02:00.000 --> 02:02.000]  The incident is under investigation.
[02:02.000 --> 02:11.000]  Alphabet Inc.'s Google is battling accusations that it manipulated its predicted searches
[02:11.000 --> 02:13.000]  function to favor Hillary Clinton.
[02:13.000 --> 02:17.000]  This is after SourceFeed, which is owned by Discovery Communications, showed that typing
[02:17.000 --> 02:22.000]  Hillary Clinton CRI into a Google search box yielded suggestion queries related to crime
[02:22.000 --> 02:27.000]  reform, crisis, and a crime bill, but it didn't include the suggested search of Hillary Clinton
[02:27.000 --> 02:28.000]  crimes.
[02:28.000 --> 02:32.000]  That is, although Google statistics show that that search is more common than the suggested
[02:32.000 --> 02:33.000]  ones.
[02:33.000 --> 02:37.000]  Google said in a statement that, quote, Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate
[02:37.000 --> 02:38.000]  or cause.
[02:38.000 --> 02:41.000]  Claim to the contrary simply misunderstands how Autocomplete works.
[02:41.000 --> 02:46.000]  Google also said that Autocomplete software won't show a predicted query that is offensive
[02:46.000 --> 02:50.000]  when displayed in conjunction with a person's name, which apparently crime is listed in
[02:50.000 --> 02:52.000]  the list of offensive terms.
[02:52.000 --> 03:17.000]  This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for June 10, 2016.
[03:17.000 --> 03:38.000]  Let's enjoy this audio clip.
[03:38.000 --> 03:43.000]  Grant Paffey told my Paffey back at my day slot
[03:43.000 --> 03:47.000]  A man had to answer for the weed that he dug
[03:47.000 --> 03:50.000]  Take all the rope in Texas, find a tall old tree
[03:50.000 --> 03:56.000]  Round up all of them bad boys, hang them high in the street
[03:56.000 --> 04:00.000]  For all the people to see
[04:00.000 --> 04:04.000]  That justice is one thing you should always find
[04:04.000 --> 04:08.000]  You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line
[04:08.000 --> 04:12.000]  When the guns won't settle, we'll sing a victory tune
[04:12.000 --> 04:16.000]  And we'll all meet back at the local school
[04:16.000 --> 04:21.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing
[04:21.000 --> 04:26.000]  Let's get for my men, bear for my horses
[04:26.000 --> 04:31.000]  Let's get for my men, bear for my horses
[04:32.000 --> 04:37.000]  We ain't got too many gangsters doing dirty deeds
[04:37.000 --> 04:40.000]  Too much corruption and crime in the streets
[04:40.000 --> 04:41.000]  It's time to hope
[04:41.000 --> 04:43.000]  Alright folks, good evening
[04:43.000 --> 04:45.000]  This is Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show
[04:45.000 --> 04:46.000]  With your host Eddie Craig
[04:46.000 --> 04:51.000]  It is June 13, 2016
[04:51.000 --> 04:54.000]  Alright, it's been a busy weekend for me
[04:54.000 --> 04:56.000]  And a busy week last week
[04:56.000 --> 04:58.000]  And it's going to be a busy week this week
[04:58.000 --> 05:01.000]  And hopefully that will all turn out to be a good thing in the long run
[05:01.000 --> 05:03.000]  But I'm not going to hold my breath one way or the other
[05:03.000 --> 05:05.000]  Until it actually happens
[05:05.000 --> 05:08.000]  Now for those of you that follow my blog site
[05:08.000 --> 05:16.000]  Dowoflaw.wordpress.com
[05:16.000 --> 05:21.000]  You'll notice that I placed a new article up there on Friday or Saturday
[05:21.000 --> 05:22.000]  I forget which day
[05:22.000 --> 05:24.000]  And I've made a couple of changes
[05:24.000 --> 05:28.000]  But only one change discussing in particular
[05:28.000 --> 05:33.000]  The fact that a transportation stop in Texas is actually an arrest
[05:33.000 --> 05:36.000]  According to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
[05:36.000 --> 05:39.000]  Now the reason all this is important
[05:39.000 --> 05:42.000]  Everything that I write about up there is to give you information
[05:42.000 --> 05:46.000]  Dealing with either the process, the law itself
[05:46.000 --> 05:50.000]  Or the arguments associated with both about what they're doing wrong
[05:50.000 --> 05:52.000]  And how they're misapplying
[05:52.000 --> 05:58.000]  Or completely ignoring and disobeying and harming us through those actions
[05:58.000 --> 06:02.000]  In any of these codes and statutes
[06:02.000 --> 06:07.000]  They tell us that anarchy means a lawless society
[06:07.000 --> 06:11.000]  Well folks, I'm here to tell you that you are living in an anarchy
[06:11.000 --> 06:16.000]  And the reason we know this is because the very people that are supposed to be
[06:16.000 --> 06:19.000]  Understanding the law, applying the law properly
[06:19.000 --> 06:22.000]  Adjudicating the law properly, enforcing the law properly
[06:22.000 --> 06:26.000]  And understanding the law properly
[06:26.000 --> 06:29.000]  Don't
[06:29.000 --> 06:31.000]  So which is worse?
[06:31.000 --> 06:39.000]  A society with no leaders responsible for our individual lives and actions
[06:39.000 --> 06:45.000]  Other than to assist in capture and punishment for harms caused to others
[06:45.000 --> 06:51.000]  But no law that restricts us in any way or regulates us in any way at our liberty
[06:51.000 --> 06:53.000]  Our choices and our actions
[06:53.000 --> 06:56.000]  Other than to do no harm
[06:56.000 --> 07:02.000]  Or a society where we have a tremendous number of laws
[07:02.000 --> 07:04.000]  None of which are obeyed
[07:04.000 --> 07:07.000]  All of which are written to be confusing, misunderstood
[07:07.000 --> 07:15.000]  In order to intentionally create conflict so as to enrich a specific part of our society
[07:15.000 --> 07:21.000]  Through the continued conflict that those laws cause to arise
[07:21.000 --> 07:23.000]  They use it to steal our property
[07:23.000 --> 07:25.000]  They use it to oppress us
[07:25.000 --> 07:29.000]  They use it to do everything the founding fathers said
[07:29.000 --> 07:34.000]  You will never ever be allowed to do again in a constitutional republic
[07:34.000 --> 07:38.000]  And yet here we are
[07:38.000 --> 07:49.000]  If that is my choice, give me anarchy in the first situation any day of the week
[07:49.000 --> 07:55.000]  Because at least then I know that I am in the right to shoot the man that accosts me
[07:55.000 --> 08:01.000]  And claims to have authority over me to compel me to do something I have no desire to do
[08:01.000 --> 08:08.000]  Or to answer for something that caused absolutely no harm to anyone or any property
[08:08.000 --> 08:16.000]  And yet I am being called a criminal because of those actions
[08:16.000 --> 08:20.000]  This was supposed to be a free country
[08:20.000 --> 08:24.000]  The laws are supposed to be kept simple for a reason
[08:24.000 --> 08:29.000]  So that the people never had to guess about what the law meant and how it affected them
[08:29.000 --> 08:32.000]  The laws were intended to be clear
[08:32.000 --> 08:37.000]  There is nothing in these statutory schemes that makes them clear
[08:37.000 --> 08:42.000]  They are written full of intentionally misleading terms and phrases
[08:42.000 --> 08:48.000]  So as to make you believe you understand them when in fact you have no clue what you're actually reading
[08:48.000 --> 08:57.000]  Because they've defined the term differently somewhere else and buried it where you don't know to go look for it
[08:57.000 --> 09:05.000]  A lot of the keys to understanding the statutory schemes in Texas are not even found in relation to the statutes themselves
[09:05.000 --> 09:13.000]  They're related to an actual pair of acts that are completely separate and apart from everything in the government code
[09:13.000 --> 09:18.000]  And those acts involve chapters 311 and 312
[09:18.000 --> 09:27.000]  One is the Co-Construction Act and one is the creation of law or interpret, I forget what the title of it is
[09:27.000 --> 09:33.000]  But they both deal with statutory creation and interpretation and understanding of terminology
[09:33.000 --> 09:35.000]  That's what those two chapters do
[09:35.000 --> 09:44.000]  In Texas those are the two primary chapters you need to study to understand the statute properly
[09:44.000 --> 09:49.000]  But in addition to understanding chapters 311 and 312 of the government code
[09:49.000 --> 09:56.000]  You have to understand how the statutes themselves are arranged, numbered, and constructed
[09:56.000 --> 10:03.000]  Now unlike federal law where they bury the definitions for their terminology way away at the end of any act
[10:03.000 --> 10:08.000]  Or in a completely different act at times, believe it or not
[10:08.000 --> 10:18.000]  Texas actually puts the definitions up front but nobody reads them, including those that are supposed to be applying that law
[10:18.000 --> 10:24.000]  And the reason we know they don't read them is because they'll go straight to the statute they're trying to charge you with
[10:24.000 --> 10:27.000]  And read it to you and say, see there, it applies!
[10:27.000 --> 10:33.000]  And then you point at the term or phrase, what does this term here mean? How is it defined in the statute?
[10:33.000 --> 10:36.000]  Well I don't know, what difference does that make?
[10:36.000 --> 10:41.000]  Well it makes a lot of difference. If you're going to say that this statute applies to me for something I'm doing
[10:41.000 --> 10:47.000]  The definition of that term means a lot
[10:47.000 --> 10:51.000]  These are the ways that they are stealing our liberty
[10:51.000 --> 10:58.000]  These are the ways that they are keeping you disinterested in learning by making it difficult to learn
[10:58.000 --> 11:06.000]  This is the reason that they have introduced new forms of education like Common Core and so on and so forth
[11:06.000 --> 11:12.000]  It is not to teach you to think outside of the box, okay?
[11:12.000 --> 11:20.000]  It is to teach you that their box can encompass anything they want it to whenever they want it to
[11:20.000 --> 11:29.000]  Now think about that. Think about what Common Core solutions you've seen on Facebook, in the news, newspaper articles
[11:29.000 --> 11:36.000]  Anywhere, okay, that you've seen examples of the gross stupidity that is Common Core and what the teacher is telling the student
[11:36.000 --> 11:46.000]  They're telling the student, your understanding and interpretation is always wrong because I can tell you a different way to do it that would make you wrong
[11:46.000 --> 11:56.000]  This is exactly the way they want you to accept their interpretation of the very statutes they're using to steal your freedom
[11:56.000 --> 12:05.000]  Think about that really hard. You read the statute, you know how to read it, you've read chapters 311 and 312
[12:05.000 --> 12:11.000]  You understand statutory construction, you understand how to determine the proper meaning of a term or phrase
[12:11.000 --> 12:25.000]  But the law in the form of the courts and the attorneys are telling you that, well, our box is this, therefore your reading is wrong
[12:25.000 --> 12:30.000]  You see how nicely that fits together?
[12:30.000 --> 12:39.000]  The Common Core disinformation to make you feel like no answer you have will ever be correct and therefore why try it all?
[12:39.000 --> 12:48.000]  Versus here's how we're going to use our methodology to make you wrong even if you are right?
[12:48.000 --> 12:59.000]  This is exactly what America was supposed to be able to allow the people to prevent
[12:59.000 --> 13:05.000]  The people were set up as the superior level of government for a reason
[13:05.000 --> 13:14.000]  And yet we have been turned upside down to be the bottom rung of the ladder in everything
[13:14.000 --> 13:22.000]  And for the life of me, I cannot figure out why people don't see this
[13:22.000 --> 13:30.000]  You would not hire a butler to manage your house on your behalf in your absence and to supervise the other servants in the house
[13:30.000 --> 13:38.000]  To make sure everything got done properly, nobody was stealing from you, just generally run the house properly
[13:38.000 --> 13:43.000]  And then come home and find that your butler has actually had the house signed over to his name
[13:43.000 --> 13:49.000]  He's taken over all the property and says that you now work for him
[13:49.000 --> 13:56.000]  Well, folks, that's exactly what's happened here. Why wouldn't that be a feasible explanation in that scenario?
[13:56.000 --> 14:03.000]  We've allowed it to happen in America. We've allowed those that we hired to act as servants to care for our property
[14:03.000 --> 14:14.000]  As if they now own that property, as if it belongs solely to them and we have access to it only at their discretion and whim
[14:14.000 --> 14:22.000]  How did we get here? Well, I have an idea about that too
[14:22.000 --> 14:27.000]  You spend your time doing anything but being interested in what's going on in your country
[14:27.000 --> 14:34.000]  You spend your time cheering on your football teams, your basketball teams, your hockey teams, your baseball teams
[14:34.000 --> 14:39.000]  You spend your time having to work multiple jobs in order to make ends meet
[14:39.000 --> 14:43.000]  Not just one of you in the household, but both of you in the household
[14:43.000 --> 14:49.000]  You spend your time watching the evening news and accepting that as the truth of what's going on in the world
[14:49.000 --> 14:54.000]  Rather than spending time figuring it out for yourself through other informational sources
[14:54.000 --> 15:02.000]  Some reliable, some not, but at least at some point you're going to run across something that's actually true
[15:02.000 --> 15:15.000]  And eventually, given your intellectual level and desire to understand it, you will be able to connect dots that the evening news is never going to connect for you
[15:15.000 --> 15:22.000]  Let's take an example, the news possible false flag in Florida at the club
[15:22.000 --> 15:28.000]  I mean, let's face the fact, this is supposed to be one of the most popular nightclubs in the entire area of Florida
[15:28.000 --> 15:34.000]  And not a single person in there had a cell phone on them, not a single person in there videoed anything
[15:34.000 --> 15:38.000]  And you know how people are with them damn cell phones and videoing things going on around them
[15:38.000 --> 15:43.000]  Somebody would have done that, but nobody did
[15:43.000 --> 15:48.000]  And I'm not saying it was a false flag, but you got to remember something else about false flags
[15:48.000 --> 15:53.000]  False flags does not necessarily mean that someone didn't die
[15:53.000 --> 16:02.000]  False flags can also literally get people killed and still be for the purpose of pushing somebody else's agenda
[16:02.000 --> 16:07.000]  They can still be prearranged and set up to push someone else's agenda
[16:07.000 --> 16:11.000]  And of course that agenda made itself known instantly
[16:11.000 --> 16:16.000]  This wouldn't have happened if we'd have had stricter gun laws
[16:16.000 --> 16:20.000]  How stupid is that statement?
[16:20.000 --> 16:28.000]  You've got strict gun laws now, and by your own admission, every one of these people got their gun perfectly legally
[16:28.000 --> 16:38.000]  In fact, there is now the possibility that this guy that allegedly did this shooting was actually one of NYPD's officers
[16:38.000 --> 16:48.000]  Get that? There's pictures of him being posted now in his NYPD t-shirt and an NYPD officer's polo shirt
[16:48.000 --> 16:51.000]  Alright folks, y'all hang on, we'll continue with this on the other side
[16:51.000 --> 17:11.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984, we'll be right back
[17:21.000 --> 17:23.000]  Lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air
[17:23.000 --> 17:27.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution
[17:27.000 --> 17:32.000]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks
[17:32.000 --> 17:35.000]  First prize being a Spikes Skull Lower Receiver
[17:35.000 --> 17:37.000]  Second prize being a Taurus Curve
[17:37.000 --> 17:39.000]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor
[17:39.000 --> 17:45.000]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud
[17:45.000 --> 17:50.000]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin
[17:50.000 --> 17:52.000]  The Logos Radio Network fundraiser
[17:52.000 --> 17:58.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method
[18:09.000 --> 18:14.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two
[18:14.000 --> 18:20.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[18:20.000 --> 18:24.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons
[18:24.000 --> 18:26.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[18:26.000 --> 18:28.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports
[18:28.000 --> 18:33.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[18:33.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[18:38.000 --> 18:40.000]  Personal consultation is available as well
[18:40.000 --> 18:46.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.000 --> 18:49.000]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[18:49.000 --> 18:51.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[18:51.000 --> 18:57.000]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.000 --> 19:00.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[19:00.000 --> 19:10.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradio.com
[19:31.000 --> 19:36.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:36.000 --> 19:42.000]  Okay. Now, on the deal in Florida, I'm not saying it wasn't real. I'm not saying it didn't happen.
[19:42.000 --> 19:48.000]  But now, of course, like everything else, it comes at a very opportune time, does it not?
[19:48.000 --> 19:54.000]  The Bilderberg meeting's going on right now. Need a mass distraction. Here's a good one.
[19:54.000 --> 19:59.000]  Let's go shoot some people in public. Let's get gun control screaming out the top of our lungs.
[19:59.000 --> 20:03.000]  Let's distract them from the things that we're doing up here at this Bilderberg gathering
[20:03.000 --> 20:08.000]  and get them focused back on what they want to do the most, protect their guns.
[20:08.000 --> 20:13.000]  Okay. Think about these things. These are the dots that a lot of people aren't putting together
[20:13.000 --> 20:18.000]  because they're not looking at this information in its totality. They're looking at it piecemeal.
[20:18.000 --> 20:26.000]  And the bad thing about compartmentalized information is you're never able to apply it to the big picture.
[20:26.000 --> 20:33.000]  And most people, whether intentionally or not, get their information compartmentalized.
[20:33.000 --> 20:39.000]  Most of that, however, I would say is self-inflicted because they don't really want to know.
[20:39.000 --> 20:46.000]  They don't want to know the truth about something, especially if it disagrees with what they want to believe.
[20:46.000 --> 20:57.000]  And that's a sad way to be. But of course, that's also part of free will and individual choice.
[20:57.000 --> 21:08.000]  So nothing about the situation will ever be perfect. But the one thing I never see making it better is government.
[21:08.000 --> 21:13.000]  So at no time will you ever hear me say more government is a solution to anything
[21:13.000 --> 21:19.000]  because to me that could not be further from the truth.
[21:19.000 --> 21:24.000]  And it certainly is not that we don't need people that lead.
[21:24.000 --> 21:32.000]  Anarchy is not about people. They're not being any one that can order you to do something.
[21:32.000 --> 21:37.000]  I mean, that is what it's about. But there's still going to be an organized community.
[21:37.000 --> 21:42.000]  There's still going to be people that lead the way on things. It's just the way we're built.
[21:42.000 --> 21:49.000]  There are going to be those that want to be completely independent up until the day they run into a situation that they cannot do themselves.
[21:49.000 --> 21:54.000]  And then, of course, they're going to have to go to someone else to get it done.
[21:54.000 --> 21:59.000]  So the point being that anarchy doesn't mean anything if it doesn't mean something.
[21:59.000 --> 22:09.000]  So while I agree that there has to be some form of government to do the things that the individuals alone aren't capable of doing,
[22:09.000 --> 22:16.000]  such as withstanding larger forces of people that are trying to harm or take what's rightfully yours,
[22:16.000 --> 22:20.000]  which is the entire reason we came together as societies and government in the first place
[22:20.000 --> 22:26.000]  and the only real power in our lives that we gave them to handle,
[22:26.000 --> 22:32.000]  to me that is all about what the individual health and welfare clause in any Constitution is about.
[22:32.000 --> 22:38.000]  Your job when it comes to the people is to ensure that no person can harm another indiscriminately,
[22:38.000 --> 22:45.000]  and no person can take another person's property unlawfully and indiscriminately.
[22:45.000 --> 22:51.000]  Other than that, leave them the hell alone.
[22:51.000 --> 22:54.000]  That would basically, to me, be what anarchy is supposed to be,
[22:54.000 --> 23:04.000]  because we still are going to have to have that international face that interfaces with the people that we do trade with and so on and so forth.
[23:04.000 --> 23:15.000]  That's still going to have to be there if we're going to do any kind of trading outside the borders of this country or this continent.
[23:15.000 --> 23:18.000]  But I don't need someone telling me how to do my day-to-day.
[23:18.000 --> 23:28.000]  I don't need someone telling me where I can go, how I can go, who I must ask if I can go, and by what means I choose to use to get there.
[23:28.000 --> 23:30.000]  I don't need anyone telling me that.
[23:30.000 --> 23:32.000]  I know how to act responsibly.
[23:32.000 --> 23:37.000]  Find someone that can tell you that I've, in any time since I got out of my teenage years,
[23:37.000 --> 23:46.000]  that I've ever done something to them that was irresponsible, that I've acted irresponsibly in such a way that they suffered for it.
[23:46.000 --> 23:51.000]  I've made my choices based upon what I know to be true or believe to be true,
[23:51.000 --> 24:00.000]  and did it either for the ethics, morals, and principles involved or because it had to be done.
[24:00.000 --> 24:04.000]  It's like what most people would choose to do.
[24:04.000 --> 24:15.000]  So what are we going to do about being free if we're not going to do something about doing away with what we have?
[24:15.000 --> 24:22.000]  Because you have to remember, here in Texas, I know for a fact the Texas Constitution says that we the people may abolish our form of government.
[24:22.000 --> 24:23.000]  Okay, not fix.
[24:23.000 --> 24:24.000]  It doesn't say fix.
[24:24.000 --> 24:26.000]  It doesn't say tinker.
[24:26.000 --> 24:33.000]  It says abolish, as in get rid of in its entirety.
[24:33.000 --> 24:38.000]  But I guarantee you if the people came together and attempted to do that,
[24:38.000 --> 24:47.000]  the very public offices that is in that government would fight to resist our ability to do exactly what we have every right to do,
[24:47.000 --> 24:51.000]  as if it somehow has a right to resist when it doesn't.
[24:51.000 --> 24:53.000]  So what do we do then?
[24:53.000 --> 24:57.000]  Do we say, oh, well, since you're the authority, we have to back down now?
[24:57.000 --> 24:58.000]  That's wrong.
[24:58.000 --> 25:01.000]  We are the authority, not them.
[25:01.000 --> 25:04.000]  And that is exactly where they have it backwards.
[25:04.000 --> 25:06.000]  They are not the authority.
[25:06.000 --> 25:09.000]  The people are.
[25:09.000 --> 25:16.000]  But until we start acting like it, they will continue to be the authority.
[25:16.000 --> 25:27.000]  Now, here's something else in that arrangement that I have absolutely no basis in supporting and think is absolutely criminal to allow to occur.
[25:27.000 --> 25:35.000]  And that is for any public office to have a voice in lobbying for what laws get passed.
[25:35.000 --> 25:36.000]  You understand that?
[25:36.000 --> 25:43.000]  The police union, the police themselves, the cities, the city attorneys,
[25:43.000 --> 25:47.000]  none of these people should have any voice in government.
[25:47.000 --> 25:49.000]  None.
[25:49.000 --> 25:51.000]  They are our creation.
[25:51.000 --> 25:58.000]  They do not have the authority or the right to speak up and say, we don't want this to happen.
[25:58.000 --> 26:03.000]  We the people don't give a crap if you want it to happen.
[26:03.000 --> 26:07.000]  You work for us.
[26:07.000 --> 26:16.000]  So when you go down there and tell and lobby for something at the legislature and say this is what the policeman would like, this is what law enforcement would like, too damn bad.
[26:16.000 --> 26:24.000]  You're not going to get it unless it is also what the people themselves want.
[26:24.000 --> 26:27.000]  Because this is our government.
[26:27.000 --> 26:44.000]  You are our offices and our officers and our servants, not our rulers, not our betters, and not the ones with the authority, despite what you would like to believe.
[26:44.000 --> 26:55.000]  But as long as we are willing to set by and let that delusion remain in their mind and in their actions, we will always be second class here.
[26:55.000 --> 27:04.000]  And the problem is, is there's too few of us to change it without a lot of bloodshed.
[27:04.000 --> 27:08.000]  If we're going to do it in a more peaceful fashion, then we need more people.
[27:08.000 --> 27:13.000]  It's that simple.
[27:13.000 --> 27:17.000]  But without that, I don't see an alternative to the bloodshed.
[27:17.000 --> 27:20.000]  That's exactly what they're going to push us into.
[27:20.000 --> 27:29.000]  You're going to come down to the day where it's kill or be killed by your own public servants.
[27:29.000 --> 27:39.000]  And we got here through apathy, ignorance, and the desire not to be any better than we were.
[27:39.000 --> 27:40.000]  And that's wrong.
[27:40.000 --> 27:43.000]  That's wrong of all of us.
[27:43.000 --> 27:47.000]  That's what makes you a victim.
[27:47.000 --> 27:51.000]  That's what makes you a second class citizen.
[27:51.000 --> 28:00.000]  That is what makes you less to them.
[28:00.000 --> 28:09.000]  I would have no qualms whatsoever about sentencing every cop in this country to prison tomorrow and every politician right beside them.
[28:09.000 --> 28:13.000]  And there would be no cries of, I haven't done anything wrong.
[28:13.000 --> 28:15.000]  I'm new.
[28:15.000 --> 28:20.000]  You took an oath to uphold immoral, unconstitutional acts.
[28:20.000 --> 28:23.000]  You took an oath to do that.
[28:23.000 --> 28:30.000]  How can you say I'm innocent?
[28:30.000 --> 28:32.000]  That, folks, is the problem.
[28:32.000 --> 28:44.000]  You're willing to take all these oaths, and you'll only uphold the ones that you think benefit you the most rather than what the oath bound you to.
[28:44.000 --> 28:49.000]  We don't have any honor anymore.
[28:49.000 --> 28:57.000]  We don't have any self-worth anymore, not as a state, not as a nation.
[28:57.000 --> 29:07.000]  Because if we did, the criminals that are currently running it into the ground would have already been imprisoned and sentenced to life.
[29:07.000 --> 29:16.000]  If we were still Americans, that would be the case.
[29:16.000 --> 29:20.000]  But we're not.
[29:20.000 --> 29:24.000]  This is not the America that I always believed we were to be.
[29:24.000 --> 29:29.000]  This is not the kind of people I believed Americans should be.
[29:29.000 --> 29:33.000]  It's not even close.
[29:33.000 --> 29:43.000]  We're spending all of our time doing everything but caring about our own freedoms and self-worth and that of our neighbors.
[29:43.000 --> 29:47.000]  And we can't protect ours without protecting theirs.
[29:47.000 --> 29:53.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, the call-in number 512-646-1984.
[29:53.000 --> 29:54.000]  Y'all get in line.
[29:54.000 --> 30:02.000]  I'll take calls after the break.
[30:02.000 --> 30:06.000]  Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.
[30:06.000 --> 30:08.000]  Whoever came up with that was sure wrong.
[30:08.000 --> 30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment to explain how your first, middle, and last names can actually affect your mortality.
[30:15.000 --> 30:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.000 --> 30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.000 --> 30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:26.000 --> 30:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.000 --> 30:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[30:33.000 --> 30:41.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.000 --> 30:44.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.000 --> 30:48.000]  The initials of your name could significantly impact how long you live.
[30:48.000 --> 30:57.000]  According to a University of California study, positive initials like VIP or ACE could add more than four years to a man's life.
[30:57.000 --> 31:03.000]  Negative initials like PIG or DIE could shorten a man's life by two years.
[31:03.000 --> 31:09.000]  While women are less impacted by negative initials than men, positive initials can add three years to their lives.
[31:09.000 --> 31:16.000]  Researchers believe initials are powerful symbols that affect how people are treated and how they feel about themselves, and research supports it.
[31:16.000 --> 31:24.000]  Those with negative initials were more likely to commit suicide and die in accidents than those with positive initials, so name your kids well.
[31:24.000 --> 31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.000 --> 31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.000 --> 31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.000 --> 31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.000 --> 31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:46.000 --> 31:48.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[31:48.000 --> 31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.000 --> 31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correction office.
[31:52.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.000 --> 31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.000 --> 31:57.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:57.000 --> 32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:01.000 --> 32:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.000 --> 32:12.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.000 --> 32:19.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.000 --> 32:25.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.000 --> 32:35.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold your courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.000 --> 32:40.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.000 --> 32:47.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:47.000 --> 32:50.000]  hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.000 --> 32:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.000 --> 33:02.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.000 --> 33:14.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:14.000 --> 33:25.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I'm going to solve them to the government to prosecute them.
[33:25.000 --> 33:32.000]  Okay.
[33:32.000 --> 33:45.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[33:45.000 --> 33:47.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:47.000 --> 33:51.000]  And right now we have callers coming up on the board here.
[33:51.000 --> 33:55.000]  We have Reverend Dr. Liam.
[33:55.000 --> 33:59.000]  Hello?
[33:59.000 --> 34:05.000]  Dr. Liam?
[34:05.000 --> 34:12.000]  Hello?
[34:12.000 --> 34:15.000]  Well, this is going to be a short conversation.
[34:15.000 --> 34:19.000]  Dr. Liam?
[34:19.000 --> 34:23.000]  All right, that didn't work out.
[34:23.000 --> 34:26.000]  All right, so we'll go to Gail.
[34:26.000 --> 34:29.000]  Gail, what can we do for you?
[34:29.000 --> 34:31.000]  Well, I've got three questions.
[34:31.000 --> 34:33.000]  Well, all right.
[34:33.000 --> 34:38.000]  Okay, I'm scheduled to appear in court July 8th in Milano, Texas,
[34:38.000 --> 34:43.000]  about seven or eight miles up the road from Rockdale.
[34:43.000 --> 34:44.000]  Okay.
[34:44.000 --> 34:48.000]  And the one question is, on one of your tapes,
[34:48.000 --> 34:55.000]  you've mentioned the District and County Attorney Association Guide to Traffic Offense.
[34:55.000 --> 34:57.000]  And I can't find that book.
[34:57.000 --> 35:00.000]  I would love to have page 18 to throw at them.
[35:00.000 --> 35:01.000]  Oh, you've got to do it.
[35:01.000 --> 35:03.000]  Well, it's not page 18 anymore in the new version.
[35:03.000 --> 35:06.000]  It was page 18 in the 2010 version.
[35:06.000 --> 35:12.000]  But you can get it off the Texas District and County Attorney Association's website.
[35:12.000 --> 35:15.000]  I think it's like 25 bucks.
[35:15.000 --> 35:17.000]  Well, they don't have one with that title.
[35:17.000 --> 35:20.000]  What they have one is something about traffic stop.
[35:20.000 --> 35:22.000]  Right, that is it.
[35:22.000 --> 35:25.000]  But if you read the title, that's what's all on there,
[35:25.000 --> 35:30.000]  Texas County and District Attorney Association's Texas Traffic Stops.
[35:30.000 --> 35:32.000]  Okay.
[35:32.000 --> 35:37.000]  So I have to read the whole book, or can you give me an idea what page to look at?
[35:37.000 --> 35:41.000]  Well, just find the same section that was on page, like what was on page 18.
[35:41.000 --> 35:43.000]  I think it's like 24 now, but I'm not positive.
[35:43.000 --> 35:46.000]  Okay, terrific.
[35:46.000 --> 35:53.000]  Now, when you were, I call it the interrogation of the police officer, you call it the cross-examination.
[35:53.000 --> 35:57.000]  But from what I could read, it was the interrogation.
[35:57.000 --> 36:03.000]  You initially set up that those laws were set up for commerce.
[36:03.000 --> 36:06.000]  And what part of the code do you use to establish it was for commerce?
[36:06.000 --> 36:07.000]  Is that the section that...
[36:07.000 --> 36:08.000]  The whole code?
[36:08.000 --> 36:10.000]  The traffic signs were set up to regulate...
[36:10.000 --> 36:14.000]  No, that's to regulate the speed of commercial motor vehicles.
[36:14.000 --> 36:17.000]  What code are we talking about here?
[36:17.000 --> 36:20.000]  Texas border vehicle code, or Texas transportation.
[36:20.000 --> 36:22.000]  Correct, transportation.
[36:22.000 --> 36:24.000]  What does transportation mean?
[36:24.000 --> 36:28.000]  So I just establish what transportation means and go from there then.
[36:28.000 --> 36:31.000]  Yeah, but how are you going to establish what transportation means?
[36:31.000 --> 36:37.000]  Well, you have to, when they use it in court, object to it, say it had been stipulated to.
[36:37.000 --> 36:42.000]  Well, that's part of it, but this isn't a question of how you object to their using it.
[36:42.000 --> 36:46.000]  This is a question of how do you intend to establish what it means.
[36:46.000 --> 36:51.000]  Okay.
[36:51.000 --> 36:54.000]  The question was directed at you.
[36:54.000 --> 36:55.000]  You said that's what you had to do.
[36:55.000 --> 37:01.000]  You're correct, but the question I'm asking you is how do you intend to do that?
[37:01.000 --> 37:04.000]  Well, I imagine at some point that they will bring up the transportation code,
[37:04.000 --> 37:10.000]  and I'll just say objection that the definition of transportation hadn't been stipulated to.
[37:10.000 --> 37:14.000]  Or bring up, there's no definition of transportation, as you were saying,
[37:14.000 --> 37:18.000]  in the code or anyplace else in the statutes.
[37:18.000 --> 37:26.000]  That's true, but how are you going to get them to accept what the definition actually is?
[37:26.000 --> 37:33.000]  See, all you're talking about is the same thing, how to object to them bringing it up.
[37:33.000 --> 37:36.000]  Okay. Well, I'm not a lawyer.
[37:36.000 --> 37:39.000]  Well, I'm not asking you to be a lawyer.
[37:39.000 --> 37:46.000]  I wouldn't insult your delicate sensibilities by insinuating you need to be one.
[37:46.000 --> 37:47.000]  Okay.
[37:47.000 --> 37:51.000]  What I'm asking you is do you know how to get it into the record,
[37:51.000 --> 37:55.000]  what the definition of transportation properly is?
[37:55.000 --> 37:56.000]  Apparently not.
[37:56.000 --> 37:57.000]  Okay.
[37:57.000 --> 37:58.000]  No, I don't.
[37:58.000 --> 38:01.000]  Then that is not the approach you're going to want to take.
[38:01.000 --> 38:04.000]  Your approach, as far as objecting, is fine.
[38:04.000 --> 38:08.000]  But if you don't know how to introduce a definition properly and the source of it,
[38:08.000 --> 38:12.000]  which in this case would have to be case law, okay?
[38:12.000 --> 38:17.000]  See, the thing is most people go into court and they try to cite the legal dictionary as the basis
[38:17.000 --> 38:19.000]  and authority for a definition.
[38:19.000 --> 38:20.000]  That's dead wrong.
[38:20.000 --> 38:23.000]  The dictionary is not an authority.
[38:23.000 --> 38:24.000]  Okay?
[38:24.000 --> 38:30.000]  However, the law is and the case law is an authority.
[38:30.000 --> 38:31.000]  Okay?
[38:31.000 --> 38:32.000]  Okay.
[38:32.000 --> 38:41.000]  In Black's Law sixth and earlier, it will tell you the case law or the law that establishes a particular definition
[38:41.000 --> 38:46.000]  as controlling in an industry or in the law period.
[38:46.000 --> 38:48.000]  Okay?
[38:48.000 --> 38:54.000]  Now, while it is true Texas has never, to my knowledge, had a case that defined transportation,
[38:54.000 --> 38:59.000]  nor does it have any statute or underlying law that does so,
[38:59.000 --> 39:01.000]  it's not that there isn't a definition.
[39:01.000 --> 39:03.000]  It's where to get it.
[39:03.000 --> 39:05.000]  Okay?
[39:05.000 --> 39:11.000]  Black's Law gives you two definitions that you need to make the definition of transportation fly,
[39:11.000 --> 39:16.000]  the definition of transportation itself and the definition of carrier.
[39:16.000 --> 39:21.000]  Neither of those terms are defined in Texas law as singular terms.
[39:21.000 --> 39:28.000]  In other words, there is emergency transportation, but there is nothing that is just transportation.
[39:28.000 --> 39:32.000]  There is common carrier, contract carrier, and private carrier,
[39:32.000 --> 39:37.000]  but there is nothing that just defines the singular term carrier.
[39:37.000 --> 39:40.000]  Okay?
[39:40.000 --> 39:46.000]  Both of those terms, however, exist in Black's, but the authority for the definition that is listed in Black's
[39:46.000 --> 39:54.000]  as far as transportation, it is the Interstate Commerce Commission versus Brimson Supreme Court case.
[39:54.000 --> 39:56.000]  That's the authority.
[39:56.000 --> 39:59.000]  So you're going to need a copy of that case.
[39:59.000 --> 40:01.000]  Okay?
[40:01.000 --> 40:07.000]  In reference to the definition of carrier, it tells you very clearly in the definition in Black's law
[40:07.000 --> 40:12.000]  that the authority for the definition is federal code.
[40:12.000 --> 40:14.000]  Okay?
[40:14.000 --> 40:21.000]  And if you actually go read the last blog article I posted, it goes into all of this in great detail.
[40:21.000 --> 40:22.000]  Okay.
[40:22.000 --> 40:30.000]  And it is called the – hang on just a second here.
[40:30.000 --> 40:37.000]  The article is Texas and Muni and Justice Courts Understanding the Due Process Consequences of Entering a Plea.
[40:37.000 --> 40:42.000]  This article goes through all the due process stuff that they pull in these courts.
[40:42.000 --> 40:50.000]  And at the footnotes at the very bottom of this article, it discusses those definitions and how to use them.
[40:50.000 --> 40:51.000]  Okay?
[40:51.000 --> 40:58.000]  So they're in footnotes one, two, three, four, and five at the bottom of this article.
[40:58.000 --> 40:59.000]  Okay.
[40:59.000 --> 41:02.000]  But if you get the chance, read the whole article because it's going to be very important to the procedure
[41:02.000 --> 41:04.000]  you're going to face when you go in there.
[41:04.000 --> 41:05.000]  Okay.
[41:05.000 --> 41:08.000]  Is there reference to where your blogs are or how to get on that?
[41:08.000 --> 41:22.000]  Dow of Law, T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W.wordpress.com.
[41:22.000 --> 41:23.000]  One last question.
[41:23.000 --> 41:24.000]  Okay.
[41:24.000 --> 41:33.000]  You had – in one of your – well, for lack of a better term, I would call it an article where you're going,
[41:33.000 --> 41:35.000]  what all has to be in the complaint?
[41:35.000 --> 41:37.000]  There's something like 21 different items have to be in there?
[41:37.000 --> 41:39.000]  For a speeding allegation, yes.
[41:39.000 --> 41:40.000]  Okay.
[41:40.000 --> 41:46.000]  I was reading those and there's – and I read the complaint they filed against me
[41:46.000 --> 41:49.000]  and there's nothing in there that refers to whether or not there was a collision.
[41:49.000 --> 41:51.000]  So I assume that since there was nothing –
[41:51.000 --> 41:55.000]  You have to file a motion to quash the complaint challenging substance.
[41:55.000 --> 41:57.000]  It does not specifically state an offense.
[41:57.000 --> 42:08.000]  Well, what I was misreading then is it says that you have the right or the responsibility to avoid a collision
[42:08.000 --> 42:10.000]  with anyone legally entering the highway.
[42:10.000 --> 42:11.000]  No.
[42:11.000 --> 42:20.000]  It says that you fail to exercise due care in controlling your speed so as to result in a collision
[42:20.000 --> 42:25.000]  with another person or vehicle either lawfully upon or entering the highway.
[42:25.000 --> 42:28.000]  So I'm misreading it then?
[42:28.000 --> 42:30.000]  Okay.
[42:30.000 --> 42:33.000]  Well, you're leaving something out that's important, but yes.
[42:33.000 --> 42:40.000]  The entire premise here is nothing in the complaint alleges you fail to use due care, correct?
[42:40.000 --> 42:44.000]  No, I've got – it's out of arms reach.
[42:44.000 --> 42:45.000]  I've got a file over here.
[42:45.000 --> 42:47.000]  Trust me, it doesn't have it.
[42:47.000 --> 42:49.000]  It doesn't have it.
[42:49.000 --> 42:55.000]  If it doesn't mention the collision, it doesn't mention failure to exercise due care.
[42:55.000 --> 43:03.000]  What they're attempting to do is charge you under 545.351A, which is entirely subjective,
[43:03.000 --> 43:08.000]  which is unconstitutional because it would be vague and ambiguous, okay?
[43:08.000 --> 43:25.000]  If you look at subsection B of 545.351, however, it repeats 545.351A and details what it means in 545.351A and 351B.
[43:25.000 --> 43:32.000]  And in those details, it very clearly states that you fail to exercise due care in the controlling of your speed
[43:32.000 --> 43:39.000]  so as to result in a collision with another person or vehicle either lawfully upon or entering the highway.
[43:39.000 --> 43:43.000]  Sir, I just need to file a motion requesting the complaint then.
[43:43.000 --> 43:48.000]  Absolutely, and stating that the complaint does not allege all of the necessary elements required to be proven
[43:48.000 --> 43:51.000]  for the allegation being made with just speeding.
[43:51.000 --> 43:53.000]  Hang on just a second and we'll finish this on the other side.
[43:53.000 --> 43:54.000]  We'll agree.
[43:54.000 --> 43:55.000]  Hang on.
[43:55.000 --> 43:57.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[43:57.000 --> 44:00.000]  We'll hang in there.
[44:00.000 --> 44:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.000 --> 44:09.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand,
[44:09.000 --> 44:14.000]  4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.000 --> 44:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.000 --> 44:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.000 --> 44:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:38.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.000 --> 44:57.000]  pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[44:57.000 --> 45:04.000]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:04.000 --> 45:08.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com,
[45:08.000 --> 45:13.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D,
[45:13.000 --> 45:16.000]  here in Austin, Texas, buying Brave New Books and Chase Bank
[45:16.000 --> 45:19.000]  for our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:24.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:24.000 --> 45:26.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products,
[45:26.000 --> 45:32.000]  including our all-shellium emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:32.000 --> 45:39.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:39.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:51.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:15.000 --> 46:20.000]  If he's not having a problem, where are you going to look for one?
[46:20.000 --> 46:24.000]  If he could not wait, then he'd bow to love.
[46:24.000 --> 46:26.000]  Would your purpose test be done?
[46:26.000 --> 46:30.000]  Watch your scatamander soldier or worry your heart's love.
[46:30.000 --> 46:32.000]  Scaffold and they'll keep the peace.
[46:32.000 --> 46:35.000]  All they're taking is a misunderstanding.
[46:35.000 --> 46:40.000]  If somebody calls the police, watch the spot sign.
[46:40.000 --> 46:44.000]  Watch the spot sign.
[46:44.000 --> 46:48.000]  Watch the spot sign.
[46:48.000 --> 46:52.000]  Watch the spot sign.
[46:52.000 --> 46:56.000]  Watch the spot sign.
[46:56.000 --> 47:00.000]  The friction is an addiction.
[47:00.000 --> 47:04.000]  The hard work can leave you tall as nails.
[47:04.000 --> 47:10.000]  The hard work can leave you tall as nails.
[47:34.000 --> 47:39.000]  Dr. Liam, are you there?
[47:39.000 --> 47:43.000]  Hello?
[47:43.000 --> 47:49.000]  Dr. Liam, are you there?
[47:49.000 --> 47:51.000]  All right, I'm going with no.
[47:51.000 --> 47:54.000]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984.
[47:54.000 --> 47:56.000]  We have Charles in Washington.
[47:56.000 --> 48:02.000]  Charles, what can we do for you?
[48:02.000 --> 48:05.000]  Hello?
[48:05.000 --> 48:07.000]  Well, this is going to be an interesting night.
[48:07.000 --> 48:11.000]  Got people calling in, but nobody talking back.
[48:11.000 --> 48:13.000]  All right, folks, I don't have anybody up on the caller board,
[48:13.000 --> 48:17.000]  so I'm just going to keep ranting and raving until I get somebody to talk to.
[48:17.000 --> 48:21.000]  Fellas, if you can hear my voice, instead of just hanging on the caller board
[48:21.000 --> 48:25.000]  and not talking to me, please drop off and listen on the Internet.
[48:25.000 --> 48:27.000]  The caller board is not a listener line.
[48:27.000 --> 48:30.000]  We need those for callers if we get any, okay?
[48:30.000 --> 48:32.000]  We appreciate it very much.
[48:32.000 --> 48:33.000]  Thank you.
[48:33.000 --> 48:36.000]  All right, now, like I was saying about the blog
[48:36.000 --> 48:38.000]  and trying to explain to the gentleman a moment ago
[48:38.000 --> 48:41.000]  when he was talking about the speeding charge,
[48:41.000 --> 48:45.000]  the section that they're attempting to use can't stand by itself.
[48:45.000 --> 48:50.000]  It doesn't make any specific allegations as to any wrongdoing.
[48:50.000 --> 48:53.000]  In fact, part of the language that the complaint has in it
[48:53.000 --> 48:55.000]  does not appear in subsection A.
[48:55.000 --> 48:59.000]  It only appears in subsection B, circumstances and conditions then existing.
[48:59.000 --> 49:02.000]  Okay?
[49:02.000 --> 49:09.000]  You have to combine A and B, and so do they, but they don't.
[49:09.000 --> 49:14.000]  They're not separate statutes, but they treat them as if they are.
[49:14.000 --> 49:20.000]  So if they attempt to use subsection A of 545.351 by itself,
[49:20.000 --> 49:26.000]  you have to object as to it being entirely subjective and thus vague and ambiguous.
[49:26.000 --> 49:28.000]  Officer, what constitutes this?
[49:28.000 --> 49:29.000]  Well, I don't know.
[49:29.000 --> 49:30.000]  I guess it's this.
[49:30.000 --> 49:33.000]  Well, could you choose any number you wanted to under these conditions?
[49:33.000 --> 49:34.000]  Yes, I could.
[49:34.000 --> 49:35.000]  Well, officer, how about this?
[49:35.000 --> 49:36.000]  Could it be under this?
[49:36.000 --> 49:37.000]  Could you choose whatever you wanted?
[49:37.000 --> 49:39.000]  Well, I suppose I could.
[49:39.000 --> 49:40.000]  There you go, Judge.
[49:40.000 --> 49:43.000]  Even the officer admits he could say anything he wanted to under this.
[49:43.000 --> 49:50.000]  Thus, it's vague and ambiguous, and it is entirely subjective to his opinion.
[49:50.000 --> 49:53.000]  Now, I don't know what morons were responsible for these rewrites,
[49:53.000 --> 49:57.000]  but there is no doubt in my mind that they were morons,
[49:57.000 --> 50:01.000]  and it is also no doubt in my mind that the intention of these morons
[50:01.000 --> 50:06.000]  was to subvert the rights of the people by intentionally removing language
[50:06.000 --> 50:11.000]  that limited the application of those statutes to the proper category of persons
[50:11.000 --> 50:13.000]  that were engaging in transportation
[50:13.000 --> 50:18.000]  so as to unlawfully encompass the entirety of the general public
[50:18.000 --> 50:24.000]  just so they could steal your money, just so they could limit your movement,
[50:24.000 --> 50:27.000]  just so they could track your movement,
[50:27.000 --> 50:33.000]  just so they could do what they do right now to steal everything they can from us
[50:33.000 --> 50:36.000]  through these unlawful means.
[50:36.000 --> 50:40.000]  Just the way it is, something we've got to do about it, though.
[50:40.000 --> 50:43.000]  All right, my caller board keeps jumping around,
[50:43.000 --> 50:45.000]  so let's see if somebody is actually on the other end now.
[50:45.000 --> 50:49.000]  Charles in Washington, are you there?
[50:49.000 --> 50:51.000]  Judge, I don't know if you can hear me.
[50:51.000 --> 50:52.000]  I can now.
[50:52.000 --> 50:53.000]  Can you hear me?
[50:53.000 --> 50:54.000]  Oh, great.
[50:54.000 --> 50:55.000]  Thank you.
[50:55.000 --> 50:57.000]  I was going to say when you were calling.
[50:57.000 --> 50:59.000]  Okay, the question is, I got two for you.
[50:59.000 --> 51:01.000]  You know, I'm in Seattle, Washington.
[51:01.000 --> 51:02.000]  Wait, wait, wait.
[51:02.000 --> 51:05.000]  Charles, Charles, what kind of phone are you on?
[51:05.000 --> 51:08.000]  I don't know, Judge.
[51:08.000 --> 51:09.000]  No, no, I don't need a brand.
[51:09.000 --> 51:13.000]  I mean, is it a cell phone, a wall phone, what?
[51:13.000 --> 51:15.000]  I'm sorry, it's the cell phone.
[51:15.000 --> 51:17.000]  Okay, move it away from your mouth.
[51:17.000 --> 51:20.000]  It's distorting really bad.
[51:20.000 --> 51:22.000]  Okay, can you hear me better now?
[51:22.000 --> 51:25.000]  You're not vibrating quite so much now when you talk.
[51:25.000 --> 51:27.000]  Okay, well, I really appreciate that.
[51:27.000 --> 51:30.000]  Well, I emailed you a few times and haven't been able to get it back
[51:30.000 --> 51:31.000]  because I know you're busy.
[51:31.000 --> 51:33.000]  And as you know, I'm in Seattle, Washington.
[51:33.000 --> 51:37.000]  Well, I had a few cars impounded, which is a big law that got up here.
[51:37.000 --> 51:42.000]  Now, if you don't renew your tabs within 45 days after that,
[51:42.000 --> 51:44.000]  then they'll tow your car.
[51:44.000 --> 51:49.000]  And so I know there's a – I've read different things about it.
[51:49.000 --> 51:51.000]  You don't need to register your car just like you don't need a license
[51:51.000 --> 51:53.000]  to travel?
[51:53.000 --> 51:56.000]  Yeah, the revised Code of Washington makes it very, very clear,
[51:56.000 --> 51:59.000]  unlike a lot of states, but the revised Code of Washington does,
[51:59.000 --> 52:01.000]  just like the California Code does,
[52:01.000 --> 52:04.000]  that that code applies only to commercial operation
[52:04.000 --> 52:05.000]  and commercial motor vehicles.
[52:05.000 --> 52:07.000]  It doesn't apply to private cars.
[52:07.000 --> 52:10.000]  There's no requirement to register a private automobile any more than
[52:10.000 --> 52:16.000]  there is to have a license for a private automobile in Washington state.
[52:16.000 --> 52:21.000]  Okay. And I need to find out where I can get that information.
[52:21.000 --> 52:22.000]  I'll submit that.
[52:22.000 --> 52:25.000]  I've actually got some research on Washington somewhere.
[52:25.000 --> 52:27.000]  I'll see if I can't dig it up.
[52:27.000 --> 52:32.000]  But the actual statutes and everything, I've got somewhere.
[52:32.000 --> 52:35.000]  I'll see what I can find.
[52:35.000 --> 52:37.000]  Okay. That is one.
[52:37.000 --> 52:42.000]  And if I can handle the registration part,
[52:42.000 --> 52:45.000]  then I should be able to get my cars back based upon that
[52:45.000 --> 52:48.000]  because that means that the ticket, because I haven't renewed them.
[52:48.000 --> 52:50.000]  Well, there's another way to do it, too.
[52:50.000 --> 52:54.000]  Once you have it, what you can do is sue them for the unlawful
[52:54.000 --> 52:56.000]  taking of private property.
[52:56.000 --> 53:00.000]  They're required to know the law just like they claim you are.
[53:00.000 --> 53:01.000]  Okay?
[53:01.000 --> 53:02.000]  Mm-hmm.
[53:02.000 --> 53:05.000]  So they are making the claim that they are required to be registered.
[53:05.000 --> 53:09.000]  Therefore, they are making the claim that they are used for commercial purposes.
[53:09.000 --> 53:13.000]  Therefore, I would sue them and make them prove it.
[53:13.000 --> 53:15.000]  Okay.
[53:15.000 --> 53:16.000]  That sounds interesting.
[53:16.000 --> 53:18.000]  That's what I was hoping to do.
[53:18.000 --> 53:20.000]  And, like you said, you'll give me the information
[53:20.000 --> 53:22.000]  because I know you don't use the license.
[53:22.000 --> 53:24.000]  If I can find it, I'll give it to you.
[53:24.000 --> 53:29.000]  But I've got gigabytes of information to have to sift through to find that stuff.
[53:29.000 --> 53:30.000]  So I'll see what I can do.
[53:30.000 --> 53:32.000]  But I've read the Washington statutes.
[53:32.000 --> 53:34.000]  I know that they say this very plainly,
[53:34.000 --> 53:39.000]  that they don't apply to anything that isn't commercial.
[53:39.000 --> 53:41.000]  And that's what my attempt is going to be
[53:41.000 --> 53:46.000]  because I think when you read that about we have the right to pursue peace
[53:46.000 --> 53:48.000]  and happiness and all that in our private vehicles,
[53:48.000 --> 53:54.000]  I was going to use that article because John Sky has sent me some stuff, too,
[53:54.000 --> 53:56.000]  that I think that would be helpful.
[53:56.000 --> 53:59.000]  But I know that there would be something to do that.
[53:59.000 --> 54:03.000]  And I figured the best way to prove that is that I don't have to register my vehicle
[54:03.000 --> 54:05.000]  because your vehicle is not registered.
[54:05.000 --> 54:07.000]  You sign the stupid statute or code they got
[54:07.000 --> 54:11.000]  that said that they could take your car off in 45 days if you don't do the tests.
[54:11.000 --> 54:17.000]  And at least I haven't done the tests because I don't want to register my cars anymore.
[54:17.000 --> 54:21.000]  I just cannot register my cars and park them on the streets because they're total.
[54:21.000 --> 54:24.000]  Well, that's just it.
[54:24.000 --> 54:26.000]  You can't store the car on the street,
[54:26.000 --> 54:30.000]  but they can't claim that not being registered is storage.
[54:30.000 --> 54:33.000]  That would be stupid.
[54:33.000 --> 54:37.000]  Registration has nothing to do with storage.
[54:37.000 --> 54:38.000]  Okay?
[54:38.000 --> 54:43.000]  So you can park them anywhere anyone else can park.
[54:43.000 --> 54:46.000]  Why wouldn't you be able to do that?
[54:46.000 --> 54:49.000]  If any other car can park on the street,
[54:49.000 --> 54:55.000]  why can't you, registered or not, when you're not required to be registered?
[54:55.000 --> 55:03.000]  I found an article because I've been doing research that says that there's no tariff on parking on public streets.
[55:03.000 --> 55:04.000]  It is all right.
[55:04.000 --> 55:09.000]  And I found an article relating to that out of the WACS and RCW.
[55:09.000 --> 55:11.000]  So that's the only way I'm going to try to bring up it.
[55:11.000 --> 55:13.000]  There's not enough information in that.
[55:13.000 --> 55:16.000]  So let me call you and see if you can help me out with that
[55:16.000 --> 55:18.000]  because I'm quite sure you're familiar with this stuff.
[55:18.000 --> 55:21.000]  So I don't want to assume because that could be years.
[55:21.000 --> 55:23.000]  And anytime they got my vehicle.
[55:23.000 --> 55:25.000]  Like I said, I know you probably have something.
[55:25.000 --> 55:27.000]  You have to do a lot of research to do that.
[55:27.000 --> 55:29.000]  And I know you're very busy.
[55:29.000 --> 55:32.000]  So that's why I was trying to get with you to find out how to go about it.
[55:32.000 --> 55:37.000]  The other thing I was going to ask you was you mentioned something about getting a program up.
[55:37.000 --> 55:39.000]  You were doing some stuff months ago.
[55:39.000 --> 55:42.000]  And it was going to be a while before you got it.
[55:42.000 --> 55:43.000]  We could call in.
[55:43.000 --> 55:45.000]  We could join the organization to get help.
[55:45.000 --> 55:47.000]  But I was curious if you got that up yet.
[55:47.000 --> 55:48.000]  No.
[55:48.000 --> 55:49.000]  Taub Law is not up yet.
[55:49.000 --> 55:53.000]  That's the problem of being one of only two people working on it for any reason
[55:53.000 --> 56:00.000]  when both of us have other things we have to do to pay the bills.
[56:00.000 --> 56:03.000]  That website is a massive project.
[56:03.000 --> 56:07.000]  It's not a simple thing to do at all.
[56:07.000 --> 56:11.000]  Even with a lot of the stuff that we're doing being built on open source software,
[56:11.000 --> 56:15.000]  the open source software most of the projects we're using aren't completed.
[56:15.000 --> 56:20.000]  So we're going to have to not only use them and finish coding them for our purposes,
[56:20.000 --> 56:23.000]  but we're going to have to link them all together,
[56:23.000 --> 56:27.000]  make sure there's tight security between them, and so on and so forth.
[56:27.000 --> 56:30.000]  There's all kinds of things that we have to do in relation to this website.
[56:30.000 --> 56:33.000]  And it would be a big undertaking for a team of 20 people.
[56:33.000 --> 56:39.000]  And here for the last three going on four years or more, it's been just two of us.
[56:39.000 --> 56:41.000]  So it's a big project.
[56:41.000 --> 56:44.000]  But, no, it's not ready yet.
[56:44.000 --> 56:49.000]  Okay, so the last thing I want to ask you is I've emailed you three or four times
[56:49.000 --> 56:50.000]  and I've responded.
[56:50.000 --> 56:52.000]  So I wanted to support the organization.
[56:52.000 --> 56:55.000]  So where do I send my donation?
[56:55.000 --> 56:57.000]  Are you wanting to support the network
[56:57.000 --> 57:00.000]  or are you wanting to donate to me and the project?
[57:00.000 --> 57:03.000]  You and the project, anything you've got going.
[57:03.000 --> 57:08.000]  Then you can go to the logosradionetwork.com webpage,
[57:08.000 --> 57:10.000]  click on the donations link at the top,
[57:10.000 --> 57:14.000]  and on that donations page there will be a my name and a gold button
[57:14.000 --> 57:17.000]  that says make a donation to Eddie.
[57:17.000 --> 57:19.000]  Okay, that's good.
[57:19.000 --> 57:21.000]  So you can set it up as a one-time.
[57:21.000 --> 57:23.000]  You can set it up as a recurring.
[57:23.000 --> 57:26.000]  You can set it up to do it any way you want to do it.
[57:26.000 --> 57:27.000]  Okay.
[57:27.000 --> 57:33.000]  Are they recorded so that I can go online to review them?
[57:33.000 --> 57:36.000]  Are you talking about my classes?
[57:36.000 --> 57:40.000]  No, I'm interested in the classes, that's for sure.
[57:40.000 --> 57:41.000]  I was going to ask that last question,
[57:41.000 --> 57:44.000]  but like these radio conversations you asked.
[57:44.000 --> 57:47.000]  Yeah, the show here, the show does have an archive.
[57:47.000 --> 57:50.000]  It takes Deborah two or three days to get it edited and posted,
[57:50.000 --> 57:54.000]  but yeah, there are archives of all the shows.
[57:54.000 --> 57:55.000]  Okay, that's what I'm saying.
[57:55.000 --> 57:59.000]  Usually the archive of Monday night's show will be up sometime
[57:59.000 --> 58:01.000]  after Wednesday, Thursday,
[58:01.000 --> 58:04.000]  and you'll have it on either Friday or the weekend or something like that.
[58:04.000 --> 58:06.000]  It all depends on how busy Deborah is
[58:06.000 --> 58:10.000]  and what projects she's trying to deal with as well.
[58:10.000 --> 58:37.000]  Okay, well, thanks for calling in, Charles.
[58:37.000 --> 58:45.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[58:45.000 --> 58:50.000]  We'll be right back after this break.
[58:50.000 --> 58:53.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:53.000 --> 58:58.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:01.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.000 --> 59:25.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word
[59:25.000 --> 59:28.000]  beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:31.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version
[59:31.000 --> 59:33.000]  simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:37.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours
[59:37.000 --> 59:44.000]  just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 59:54.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[59:54.000 --> 01:00:01.000]  logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  Following these flashes brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown,
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market,
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:12.000]  today in history, news updates,
[01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:24.000]  Markets for Friday, the 10th of June, 2016,
[01:00:24.000 --> 01:00:28.000]  are currently treading with gold at $1,273.54 an ounce,
[01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:31.000]  silver $17.32 an ounce,
[01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:34.000]  Texas crude $50.56 a barrel,
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:44.000]  and Bitcoin seems to be leveling off at $580 U.S. currency.
[01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:47.000]  Today in history, the year 1967,
[01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:50.000]  the states of Israel, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Egypt
[01:00:50.000 --> 01:00:54.000]  end the Six-Day War with assistance from the United Nations.
[01:00:54.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  Air casualties are estimated at around 20,000,
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:00:59.000]  and 1,000 are estimated for Israel.
[01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:01.000]  Though the ceasefire wasn't signed until the 11th,
[01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:05.000]  the United Arab Republic began the retreat between them and Israel
[01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:11.000]  in the Six-Day War today in history.
[01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:15.000]  In recent news, Brian Armstrong recorded an incident around noon
[01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  outside the Dallas Lovefield Airport today
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:20.000]  where an unidentified man was shot several times
[01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:23.000]  right by the entry-exit doorways by the police.
[01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  Of course, the airport was briefly placed on lockdown.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:28.000]  Dallas Assistant Chief of Police Randall Blankenbaker said that
[01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:31.000]  a number of people who had been waiting to get through security
[01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:32.000]  when the shots went off
[01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:35.000]  ran past the TSA workers to get away from the chaos,
[01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:37.000]  and this was the reasoning for the lockdown.
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  Apparently, the man who was shot and a woman, the mother of his kids,
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  got into some kind of domestic dispute outside of baggage claims
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  when the man began to use rocks to attack the lady.
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:49.000]  When she cried for help, the police showed up,
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:51.000]  and then he allegedly began to charge the police,
[01:01:51.000 --> 01:01:54.000]  which led them to firing several rounds at him.
[01:01:54.000 --> 01:01:55.000]  Luckily, she wasn't hurt,
[01:01:55.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  and the officer that shot the man was placed on leave
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:00.000]  as is normal procedure following any shooting.
[01:02:00.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  The incident is under investigation.
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:09.000]  Alphabet Incorporated's Google is battling accusations
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:12.000]  that it manipulated its predicted searches function
[01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:13.000]  to favor Hillary Clinton.
[01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  This is after SourceFeed, which is owned by Discovery Communications,
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  showed that typing Hillary Clinton CRI into a Google search box
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:25.000]  yielded suggestion queries related to crime reform, crisis, and a crime bill,
[01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:29.000]  but it didn't include the suggested search of Hillary Clinton crimes.
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:32.000]  That is, although Google statistics show that that search is more common
[01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:33.000]  than the suggested ones.
[01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  Google said in a statement that,
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:38.000]  quote, Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause.
[01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  Claiming to the contrary simply misunderstands how Autocomplete works.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:46.000]  Google also said that Autocomplete software won't show a predicted query
[01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  that is offensive when displayed in conjunction with a person's name,
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:53.000]  which apparently crime is listed in the list of offensive terms.
[01:02:53.000 --> 01:02:58.000]  This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for June 10, 2016.
[01:02:58.000 --> 01:03:25.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:35.000]  All right, let's try one more time.
[01:03:35.000 --> 01:03:42.000]  Dr. Liam, are you there?
[01:03:42.000 --> 01:03:46.000]  All right, I want to go with a big no on that, and we'll move on.
[01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:50.000]  Steve in Florida, are you there?
[01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:51.000]  Yes, I'm here.
[01:03:51.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  Hello, Mr. Craig.
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:55.000]  Hi.
[01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  I sent you, we talked on the air last week.
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:00.000]  I was arrested in Florida and tased.
[01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:05.000]  They said they were stopping me and my wife on the street for domestic violence,
[01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:07.000]  several calls that they had.
[01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  You might recall that.
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:17.000]  I sent, I replied to your email, and I thank you for emailing me.
[01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:21.000]  I did send you a PDF with a number of the reports.
[01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  Did you receive that?
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:24.000]  Truthfully, I don't know.
[01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  I've had a busy couple of days as far as that goes.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:31.000]  I will look and see.
[01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:32.000]  I'm sorry?
[01:04:32.000 --> 01:04:43.000]  I also gave a donation of $50 for your, very gracious that you replied to me with very helpful, you know, information.
[01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  I also have a date from, my wife does have a June 30 date for her first court appearance for two resisting charges, misdemeanors.
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  And our attorney is, has requested discovery and is awaiting that.
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:05.000]  We have not yet been as pointed as we would like to be.
[01:05:05.000 --> 01:05:07.000]  We're waiting for the discovery.
[01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:09.000]  We hope that he will share all that with us.
[01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:13.000]  And I would like to ask you how I may.
[01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:15.000]  Don't hope for your attorney to do anything.
[01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:18.000]  He is your employee.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  Whatever he gets, you have every right to see.
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:25.000]  Every document he gets in relation to your case belongs to you, not to him.
[01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:27.000]  Don't ever forget that.
[01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:31.000]  You bought and paid for everything he has.
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:33.000]  Yeah.
[01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:36.000]  We want to maximize that discovery list.
[01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  Are there any samples online that you can point to?
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  You cannot maximize anything.
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  You, if you have an attorney, they will not take anything from you whatsoever.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:52.000]  Your attorney is the only one they will let file anything.
[01:05:52.000 --> 01:05:53.000]  Okay.
[01:05:53.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  Okay.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  So I.
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:05:58.000]  Now, is that right?
[01:05:58.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  No, but it's what they do.
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:03.000]  Yeah.
[01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  We'll be asking our lawyer to interrogate the cop for specific yes or no questions
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:15.000]  to determine if he did not afford us reasonable time to dispel any alarm
[01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:19.000]  and immediate concern that's in the loitering law.
[01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:22.000]  My understanding is that regarding stopping someone,
[01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  because I do want to go to roll it back to the initial.
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:27.000]  Okay.
[01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:28.000]  What do you mean the loitering law?
[01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:30.000]  What does that have to do with anything?
[01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  You get charged with loitering?
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  Well, no, sir.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:38.000]  But regarding, there is resisting and I have two assault charges myself.
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  I also have a domestic charge, domestic myself and.
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:46.000]  Well, the thing is, is they can't prove domestic without a witness.
[01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:50.000]  And if your wife is telling them it didn't happen, they're not going to,
[01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:53.000]  even the other lady can't say that she saw you commit an assault
[01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:58.000]  when your wife is saying he did no such thing.
[01:06:58.000 --> 01:06:59.000]  Right.
[01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:02.000]  So I wanted to dial it back to the reason I mentioned loitering is
[01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:05.000]  because I wanted to dial it back to that initial stop.
[01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  The DV law is very simple in the statute of Florida, which is.
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  So what law?
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  Is a domestic violence that includes sexual battery, sexual assault,
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:21.000]  kidnapping, sexual offense or any criminal offense resulting in physical injury or death.
[01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  Well, my wife is not dead and she has no physical injuries.
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:28.000]  So I want to dial it back to, well, why did they stop us?
[01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:32.000]  And with regard to that, that's why I looked up the stop and frisk law
[01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:35.000]  and the loitering or prowling law, because the stop and frisk law,
[01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  my understanding having read it many times is that this statute says what the officer has a duty to do.
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  However, there's nothing about what the citizen must do during that stop on the street.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  But the loitering does detail that the officer must give opportunity to dispel alarm or any immediate.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:56.000]  But the thing is, you're not being charged with loitering.
[01:07:56.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  You can't use anything in the loitering statute.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:00.000]  It's not relevant.
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:02.000]  Okay.
[01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:09.000]  All the attorney has to do is determine whether or not the officer had any original probable cause to seize anyone.
[01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:16.000]  There's a difference between reasonable, articulable suspicion to investigate an allegation,
[01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:20.000]  such as what they had versus probable cause to seize without a warrant.
[01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:24.000]  They are two very different things.
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:30.000]  Now, he may have had suspicion that he needed to investigate something because of a report he had.
[01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  But when that report was not confirmed, his reasonable suspicion and probable cause no longer existed.
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  Okay.
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  That's very interesting.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:47.000]  In this report, he said a man said he observed a white male grabbing hold of a woman attempting to pull her.
[01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  And the man said it appeared she was trying to get away from him.
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:09:00.000]  So in the last sentence of his report, he says the wife refused to.
[01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:09.000]  The wife would not say he grabbed her, but he was trying to stop her from leaving.
[01:09:09.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  In other words, she wanted to go shop or do something else.
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:15.000]  And I said, honey, it's getting late. Let's go to the car.
[01:09:15.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  So she did want to kind of walk away from me.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  Okay. Don't help the cop.
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  Okay.
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:24.000]  Right.
[01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:25.000]  All right.
[01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  Stick to the fact that your wife is saying I was not injured.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:29.000]  He did not assault me.
[01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:32.000]  There was no violence.
[01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:33.000]  Yeah.
[01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:35.000]  She said that in her statement as they were.
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:36.000]  Exactly.
[01:09:36.000 --> 01:09:40.000]  In other words, his initial investigation was not confirmed.
[01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:47.000]  His reasonable suspicion and articulable probable cause no longer existed.
[01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  Regarding his investigation, sir, in the first paragraph of his statement,
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:56.000]  he mentioned nine times that he talked to me.
[01:09:56.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  He never did once look at or acknowledge my wife or speak with her.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  He did spell out that he said to her, I said to the female,
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:14.000]  this is one speaking to her out of nine speaking to me,
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:17.000]  I said to the female, who was later identified as blah, blah, blah,
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  to come with me so I could separate the two.
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  Before I did so, I wanted to identify the male.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:25.000]  I asked him for his identification.
[01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:30.000]  In our recollection, within five seconds, he had his hands on me.
[01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:33.000]  In his recollection or in his reporting,
[01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  he said that he spoke with me nine times before any arrest was made.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  I did say, am I being detained? Am I being detained?
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  And he did write that down.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  Okay.
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:46.000]  And I can recall that.
[01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:49.000]  Well, the thing about it is the video is going to be the only thing,
[01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  other than eyewitness testimony, that will refute what's written in his report.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  If you can show the facts of the matter are different than what's written in his report,
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:04.000]  then odds are you can impeach any and all of his testimony as a ball-faced constructive lie.
[01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  Okay.
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  But your attorney is the one who's going to have to go through the process of doing that.
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  And I'm going to give you a heads up.
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:15.000]  Don't be telling your attorney how to do that.
[01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  Okay?
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:17.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:20.000]  I'm very, very, very cognizant of that fact.
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:25.000]  I do not want to tip him off that I am interested in, if need be,
[01:11:25.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  pro se defense of myself for a civil lawsuit and remedy.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:31.000]  After all...
[01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:38.000]  Ask him what he intends to do as far as impeaching the original grounds for the arrest
[01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  that the officer never had probable cause.
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:44.000]  He may have had reasonable suspicion to investigate,
[01:11:44.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  but once your wife confirmed that nothing that the allegations that he had possession of
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  and the facts he had possession of at the time were said to be false
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:12:01.000]  by the person that allegedly was abused, then his probable cause was no longer in existence,
[01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  nor was any more reasonable suspicion unless he could identify specific evidentiary facts such as bruises,
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:14.000]  welts, red marks in the shape of a hand, or something of that nature
[01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:19.000]  that would have indicated that he was being lied to about violence.
[01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:22.000]  They did not investigate her. They did not look at her.
[01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:24.000]  You're missing my point.
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  If they did or they didn't, that's something your video is going to show
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:32.000]  that they are lying about in the report.
[01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:37.000]  Or if that's what they're saying is the basis for their original investigation
[01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:43.000]  and she told them that wasn't true, then it removes their probable cause to make an arrest
[01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:46.000]  or to hold you against your will.
[01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:47.000]  Yes.
[01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  Okay?
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  So ask the question of the attorney the way I told you to ask it.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  What do you intend to do about challenging the original basis of the officer's
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  reasonable suspicion and probable cause to accost us?
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:06.000]  Okay.
[01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:07.000]  Okay.
[01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:13.000]  If he tells you nothing, now you know that you need to get in his face.
[01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  Okay.
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:17.000]  Okay.
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  And you'll say, look, the report he wrote is a ball-faced lie.
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  He is telling things that didn't occur.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  He is saying he did things this way. It's not how he did them.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:28.000]  His body camera and any cruiser cameras will probably,
[01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:32.000]  and security cameras will probably show that that's all a lie.
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  And I want it. I want you to get it.
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:40.000]  And I want you to go after him for his original laying of hands upon me
[01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:43.000]  without any probable cause.
[01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  I went to the scene myself and looked for cameras.
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  I found one that would have been pointing in our general vicinity.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:54.000]  However, it stopped at the bar in the property.
[01:13:54.000 --> 01:13:56.000]  I did not go to the street.
[01:13:56.000 --> 01:13:58.000]  It would have been pointing at us, but it was a small,
[01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:01.000]  probably not very efficient camera.
[01:14:01.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  How do you know what it saw and what it didn't? Did you see the video?
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:07.000]  I don't know. No, I did not.
[01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:09.000]  Well, then you don't know what kind of lens is on that camera.
[01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:14.000]  As far as you know, it can see 360 degrees around it.
[01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:18.000]  Okay. I have that bar owner's telephone number. I can contact him.
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:21.000]  Okay. You've got to remember, fish-eye lenses, wall-eye lenses,
[01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:26.000]  things like that have an extremely huge range of view.
[01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  Okay.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  A GoPro camera sitting on the dash of your car can actually see
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:37.000]  out the front window all the way around itself to the side mirrors on the doors.
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  Okay. Can I obtain audio of 911 dispatch and the woman's call?
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:52.000]  If discovery or public information request is filed for it
[01:14:52.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  or discovery is filed for it, absolutely.
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:58.000]  Okay. So I should tell my lawyer to...
[01:14:58.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  Yeah. I want the recordings of the 911 call.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  I want recordings of any of the traffic between the dispatcher
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  and the police units and the officers on the scene.
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:12.000]  I want all of that. I want you to review all that.
[01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  I want you to find where they're lying based on what they wrote
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  and what they did and what the video shows they're lying about.
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:25.000]  Okay. Regarding the initial hearing, with regards to my wife,
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:30.000]  it said that she did not have to state any convictions that she had.
[01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  It also said that during the initial hearing...
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  This is for release, excuse me, for release.
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  Upon release, she was not required to tell of any convictions she had,
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  and later it said she was not required to tell of any arrests.
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:49.000]  She does have a sealed arrest for domestic violence in another state.
[01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:54.000]  She was given by the White House, actually not by the White House,
[01:15:54.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  but by the federal government, a VAWA, which is called Violence Against Women Act.
[01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:04.000]  Okay. How is that relevant to what's going on here?
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:08.000]  I don't need a complete family history unless it's somehow relevant to your case.
[01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  Okay. Regarding the case, I've not yet been able to find
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:19.000]  if she is required to tell the attorney or anyone about prior arrests.
[01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  If it's sealed, I would think not.
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  Okay. Where may I look to research that?
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:28.000]  Well, I don't know that. Ask your attorney.
[01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:31.000]  I don't know what the law in Florida is on that.
[01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  Okay. She's not yet told the attorney because she didn't feel she needed to.
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:38.000]  Well, we don't know for sure. Ask him anyway.
[01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:40.000]  Okay. Thank you.
[01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  Okay. All right. Anything else?
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  No. Thank you for your assistance.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  All right. No problem. You hang in there, and good luck.
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:54.000]  The call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:54.000 --> 01:17:05.000]  Give us a call. Get in line. We will be right back.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:26.000]  We will be right back.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:17:56.000]  We will be right back.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:26.000]  We will be right back.
[01:18:54.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  Located at 1904 Guadalupe Street or order online today at MyMagicMud.com.
[01:19:24.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  Well, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  I was blindsided, but now I can see you now.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:46.000]  You put the fear in my pocket, took the money from my hand.
[01:19:46.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:10.000]  All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:14.000]  All right. We have Laura in Arizona.
[01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  Laura, what can we do for you?
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:20.000]  Hi, Laura. Hi, Eddie. Thanks for taking my call.
[01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:22.000]  You're welcome.
[01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:26.000]  I have, I don't know if you can help me or if I need to call in to Randy,
[01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:32.000]  but my mother is the victim of a criminal damage lawsuit here in Arizona
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:38.000]  where an individual who had a rental property came down her road
[01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:44.000]  and dug up her easement and a bunch of trees that sit next to the road.
[01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  As a result, the case has gone to the state of Arizona
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:52.000]  for prosecution by the county attorney's office.
[01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:56.000]  A few weeks ago, we had a restitution hearing
[01:20:56.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  where we presented proposals from licensed contractors
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  who gave detailed assessments of the damage done
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:10.000]  as well as what it would take to restore the property
[01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:13.000]  to its original state as best that they could.
[01:21:13.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  The defense attorney provided evidence of contractors who were not licensed.
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  And so we presented two from licensed contractors.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  The defense presented two from unlicensed contractors.
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:33.000]  Did you have evidence at the time that they were unlicensed?
[01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:36.000]  Yes, there was testimony and evidence provided
[01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  through what's called the Arizona Registrar of Contractors.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:45.000]  It was also admitted by the defense that those individuals were not licensed.
[01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  Okay.
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  Okay, so the judge has since issued his ruling,
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:58.000]  which basically went with an amount of restitution
[01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:06.000]  lower than one of the unlicensed contractors.
[01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:13.000]  And the county attorney today has entered into a plea agreement
[01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:18.000]  with the defendant for deferred prosecution of a period of eight months
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:21.000]  along with this lower amount.
[01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:24.000]  I have asked the county attorney at least three times in writing
[01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  to help me understand how a judge can rule on an amount of restitution
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  lower than what it would take to restore the land.
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:43.000]  And I even have a statute, so I don't know how good a statute is in Arizona,
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  but there is a specific statute on our book
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:50.000]  that says engaging in contracting without a license is prohibited,
[01:22:50.000 --> 01:22:53.000]  and it's the Class 1 misdemeanor.
[01:22:53.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  And so in essence, the statute says that you can't even accept a bid
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:02.000]  from someone who is not, and not only do you have to be licensed,
[01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:06.000]  but you also have to be licensed in that particular line of work.
[01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  Well, let me ask you this question.
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  Is the judge limited to a specific money amount by any statute
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:17.000]  as to minimum restitution?
[01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  No.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  Okay.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:21.000]  Therein lies the problem.
[01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  You're trying to assume, based upon what you know,
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:32.000]  that he used the non-contractor or the non-licensed contractor bids
[01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  as the basis for making the money amount.
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:36.000]  That may not necessarily be true.
[01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  He does not give a crap what it cost you to fix it.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  He thinks you should make up the difference yourself for whatever reason.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  That could be just as much a thinking as anything else.
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:46.000]  But here's my question.
[01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:50.000]  This restitution hearing is based upon the criminal prosecution
[01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:52.000]  of the accused, right?
[01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:53.000]  Yes.
[01:23:53.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  Okay.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  What prevents you from suing them on top of that?
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:23:59.000]  Nothing.
[01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:01.000]  I mean, it means suing the defendant?
[01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:03.000]  Yes.
[01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  Oh, yeah, no, nothing.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:05.000]  Okay.
[01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:09.000]  Then that's where I would make up my difference.
[01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  Okay.
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  If the judge is going to say the criminal penalty for what you did is this,
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  there is not a thing in the world you're going to be able to do about that
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  if he's not predisposed by statute to determine a certain money amount.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:24.000]  And this was a bench trial.
[01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:28.000]  If this was to be done by his ruling, then you're stuck with what he rules on.
[01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  You can appeal it, but, of course, that would be what the prosecuting attorney,
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:33.000]  the county attorney, has to do.
[01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:38.000]  He has to choose to do it, which he isn't if he's entering into a plea agreement.
[01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  Right.
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  Okay.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  So the only thing that leaves you to do to make up the difference
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:47.000]  in what the judge didn't give you and any other things you may be entitled to
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  is a civil lawsuit against the defendant,
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  which you can show that they had a conviction under the criminal side for doing it.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  That would be good strong grounds for your civil suit to succeed.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:03.000]  They were already convicted of doing it,
[01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:06.000]  but they were not required to pay the full restitution,
[01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  so we're here suing trying to get the remaining money
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  and whatever else we may be entitled to by law because of their actions,
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  even if it's punitive or whatever.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  Okay.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  Okay.
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  All right.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:25.000]  And part of that was my line of thinking.
[01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  The other side of the deal was I wasn't sure if it was because,
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:36.000]  at least in Arizona, the judge is prohibited from,
[01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  they really can't reduce, if you come forth with reasonable costs
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:44.000]  to restore the person or property as a whole.
[01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  The judge doesn't have the discretion to reduce that amount, so it says.
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:51.000]  Okay.
[01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  Then what you need to be doing is finding out why the prosecuting attorney
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:25:59.000]  is allowing the judge to do this by doing a plea agreement,
[01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  because the prosecuting attorney could appeal that judge's ruling
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  based on that alone if that's true.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  Okay.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:12.000]  All right.
[01:26:12.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  I wasn't sure if I should proceed with a bar grieve against, you know.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  You'd have to file a judicial conduct complaint against the judge.
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  Oh, yeah, that too.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:23.000]  That wouldn't be much of a problem.
[01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  And then you could bar grieve the county attorney
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  if the county attorney doesn't give you a satisfactory answer.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:32.000]  Well, that's good to know.
[01:26:32.000 --> 01:26:33.000]  All right.
[01:26:33.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  Well, I think I'm on the right track then.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:36.000]  Okay.
[01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:39.000]  But if there's nothing in there that prohibits you from a civil lawsuit
[01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  on top of the criminal punishment for this particular type of restitution, do it.
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  Okay.
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  Yeah.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:49.000]  The only thing I have to do is just make sure that I'm under the –
[01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:50.000]  within the status on the station.
[01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  Correct.
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  Yeah.
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:55.000]  Okay.
[01:26:55.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  Well, that's all I had tonight.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  All right.
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  Well, good luck.
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:26:59.000]  I appreciate it.
[01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:01.000]  Yes, ma'am.
[01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  Okay, thanks.
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:03.000]  You're welcome.
[01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  Bye.
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  All right.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  Now we have Oliver in Tennessee.
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:11.000]  Oliver, what can we do for you?
[01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  How you doing, Eddie?
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:14.000]  Doing all right.
[01:27:14.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  I had a little situation where the city demolished my house.
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  And I'm looking over all the paperwork that they got from the department.
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  And they're saying that I violated some property maintenance code.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  And they condemned it.
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  They condemned the house, and they tore it down in the 18th.
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:42.000]  They also towed 10 cars from my property.
[01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:49.000]  And come to find out there's no written authority for them to tow cars from my property.
[01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  And the condemnation, the condemned hearing or proceeding happened in the building official's office.
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:02.000]  No court proceedings, no court paperwork, no due process,
[01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:06.000]  nothing. They gave them the right to condemn.
[01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:09.000]  And they're telling me that there's two different kinds of condemns.
[01:28:09.000 --> 01:28:13.000]  Because when I went and go look in the condemned, in the state statute,
[01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  and who had the power to condemn in the state statute,
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  all the condemnations required compensation.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:22.000]  Right.
[01:28:22.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  They even said that in the statute.
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:29.000]  So where are they telling you the second one comes from?
[01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  Every time I ask, nobody gives me an answer, even the attorneys that I go to see to try to get assistance.
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  They're like, whoa, the city got the right to condemn.
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  I'm like, well, I'm sorry.
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  No, no, no, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  That's a typical answer.
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:48.000]  Guaranteed they're attempting to use some condemnation ordinance that they've created themselves.
[01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:53.000]  The problem there is, is I guarantee that if you read the state constitution itself,
[01:28:53.000 --> 01:29:04.000]  that they are only authorized to do those things to property they own, not to private property.
[01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:08.000]  If the Tennessee Constitution is anything like the Texas Constitution,
[01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:11.000]  only the legislature has the power to make law.
[01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  The cities don't.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  Their ordinances are not law any more than they are here in Texas.
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  Right.
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:26.000]  They cannot use them as if they're binding public law upon the people and their private property.
[01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:29.000]  I can't get that across to the attorneys.
[01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  You don't get it across to them by arguing with them.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  You get it across to them by suing the living crap out of them on their individual basis and official capacity.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  You talking about the civil attorneys that I'm trying to aspire to help me?
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  The attorneys are not going to go against the governmental entity for you.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  They know how big a battle that is because they've arranged it that way.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  Okay.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  So you've got to figure out how to do it.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:29:56.000]  Hang on just a second.
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:29:57.000]  We'll talk a little more on the other side.
[01:29:57.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  All right, folks.
[01:29:58.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  Y'all hang on.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  Kids sue parents for abuse, and sometimes rightly so.
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  But in Illinois, two adult kids went after their mother for some pretty flimsy reasons.
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you about their so-called suffering.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:41.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:47.000]  How's this for ingratitude?
[01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  In Illinois, a man and his sister filed a $50,000 lawsuit against their mother,
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:55.000]  Kimberly Garrity, for emotional distress.
[01:30:55.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  Her alleged offenses include not taking her daughter to a car show,
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  telling her boy when he was seven years old to buckle his seat belts and get this,
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:07.000]  sending him a birthday card with no money inside.
[01:31:07.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  After two years, an appeals court dismissed the case,
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  explaining that a ruling against the mother would have subjected all parents to excessive scrutiny and interference.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:17.000]  Amen.
[01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  My only question, why did it take a court two years to come to that decision?
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:34.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  There is more to the story.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  Go to BuildingWatch.org.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Why it's hell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:18.000]  and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:32:18.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years,
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:24.000]  and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:32:24.000 --> 01:32:28.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:31.000]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:34.000]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts
[01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO,
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:49.000]  and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:54.000]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367,
[01:32:54.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  Only at HempUSA.org.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:13.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:17.000]  Yeah, who you want to chip? Who you take me for? Free Tully?
[01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:20.000]  Who you want to chip? I'm not free Tully. You can't chip me.
[01:33:20.000 --> 01:33:22.000]  I'm a spy.
[01:33:22.000 --> 01:33:25.000]  Don't let them chip you in the morning, chip you in the evening.
[01:33:25.000 --> 01:33:27.000]  Who can chip in on your body?
[01:33:27.000 --> 01:33:29.000]  And anyway, when you go computer reading,
[01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:31.000]  you can't hide me safe from nobody.
[01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:34.000]  When you say, chip in on your mom, chip in on your daddy,
[01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:37.000]  chip in on your grandpa and your granny,
[01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:39.000]  chip in on me, chip in on your baby,
[01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  chip in on your family, whole family,
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  chip in on your dad and they kept around me,
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  chip in on the beef and you still go eat it,
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:48.000]  chip in on the fish, them all in the sea,
[01:33:48.000 --> 01:33:50.000]  chip in on the shark and the whale around me,
[01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  you're not still mankind, we ain't chip crazy,
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  they're the cleanest thing, man, they want to read it,
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:57.000]  so, so, security, they go tell me,
[01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  number when they give me, they repeat up your seat.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:06.000]  We got a half an hour to go in the show.
[01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  And right now, we are still talking with Oliver in Tennessee.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  All right, Oliver, go ahead.
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:14.000]  All right, well, let me go ahead and fill you in
[01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:15.000]  the whole situation.
[01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  First, the police showed up.
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:19.000]  They started throwing me in my car,
[01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  so I got in my car to move some of them
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:25.000]  because I figured they'd demolish the house.
[01:34:25.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  Then the police arrested me on my property,
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  saying that I didn't have a valid driver's license
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  because I'm known for using your technique
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  of not giving them driver's license
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:40.000]  and going to court and getting the charges dismissed.
[01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  But I don't know if they're not relating to the officers
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:46.000]  that they're dismissing my charges or what.
[01:34:46.000 --> 01:34:51.000]  But they arrest me on my property without a warrant,
[01:34:51.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  saying that, oh, I have a suspended license to Tennessee,
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  which I don't even have a license to Tennessee.
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:00.000]  I have a valid license from Virginia.
[01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:02.000]  So they took me to jail for that.
[01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  Once they took me to jail, they told...
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  Yeah, that was the entire reason they arrested you
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:10.000]  was so they could steal your other cars without interference.
[01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:12.000]  Right. So how do I write that?
[01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  I mean, is that conspiracy? Is that...
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  That's aggravated kidnapping. That's aggravated assault.
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:23.000]  That's aggravated robbery too, right?
[01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  Well, does Tennessee have grand theft auto?
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:28.000]  Yes.
[01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  Burglary of a vehicle?
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:32.000]  Yes, it does.
[01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  There you go.
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:35.000]  Okay.
[01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:41.000]  So all those charges, when I go, if I take it civilly myself,
[01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  I can press all those charges...
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  No, no, no, no, no.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  Those are criminal charges. You can press those charges.
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  Only some of them may have the ability to be sued over as torts.
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  The assault for sure.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  The false imprisonment for sure.
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:02.000]  Okay.
[01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  All right. Is there any action that I could take before?
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  Because right now I'm trying to study because I'm realizing I might have to take this...
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:12.000]  Yeah, you can send them a tort letter telling them you're going to sue them
[01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:16.000]  if the return of your property is not done within X days
[01:36:16.000 --> 01:36:19.000]  and all fees and expenses on your behalf are paid,
[01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  or you can go down and attempt to file a claim on the city's insurance policy
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  for the destruction of your property and theft of your property.
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  You can file on the insurance...
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:36.000]  Yeah, the city has an insurance carrier that bonds them for indemnity
[01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  when they do stuff like this that they would have to pay out for.
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  You can go file a claim for that and make them pay anyway.
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  Without taking them to civil court?
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  Yeah.
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:50.000]  I mean without...
[01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  File city insurance.
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  I've never heard of that before.
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:00.000]  Every municipality is bonded.
[01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  They're bonded through an insurance company.
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  It's what they used to cover the cops nowadays.
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  See, cops used to have to post their own bonds.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  They couldn't hold office without the posting of a bond.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:17.000]  And to ensure that they did their jobs correctly and not have to forfeit that bond,
[01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:19.000]  they came out of their pocket.
[01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:20.000]  Now it's not.
[01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  It's all covered by one big insurance policy for them and their employer.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  You can go down to the city...
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:32.000]  I don't know which office it will be in Tennessee,
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  but you can go down and find out where you have to go to file a claim against the city's bond.
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  Okay.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:45.000]  City bond.
[01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  I don't know.
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:48.000]  Not city bond.
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  That will sound like it's a financing plan that you're trying to buy bonds for.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  They want to file against their insurance bond.
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  Insurance bond.
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  Okay.
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  The city's insurance bond.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:01.000]  Correct.
[01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:02.000]  And I call around...
[01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:04.000]  I call around to which office?
[01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  I don't know.
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:10.000]  Start with the city secretary and go from there.
[01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:14.000]  Just ask him, if I have a monetary claim for damages against the city,
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  who do I need to go see to file the claim?
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  Monetary...
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  Right.
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  If I have a monetary claim for damages against the city,
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:35.000]  who do I need to go see to file the claim?
[01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:36.000]  Where is the office?
[01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:37.000]  What's the address?
[01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  And who do I speak to?
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:43.000]  Okay.
[01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:46.000]  As far as my car is being towed without...
[01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  Because I'm checking the TCF...
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:51.000]  You can either file on the bond for those as well,
[01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:56.000]  or you can try to force them to give them back to you by suing them.
[01:38:56.000 --> 01:38:58.000]  Or you can bring it up at the time you're filing the bond.
[01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:01.000]  I'm charging you X amount of dollars for every single car.
[01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  You don't want to pay it, give me my cars back.
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:08.000]  Okay.
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:12.000]  So there's no courts involved in this insurance bond?
[01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:13.000]  No.
[01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:17.000]  The court will become involved once they say they're not going to pay.
[01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:18.000]  Okay.
[01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:21.000]  Then you've exhausted your administrative remedies for that purpose,
[01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:28.000]  and you can now sue.
[01:39:28.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  Okay.
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  So I have to go through the step that you just said earlier before I sue.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:37.000]  I don't know that you have to,
[01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:43.000]  but it would show that you made a good-faith effort to get compensated for the governmental taking,
[01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:49.000]  which they're not allowed to do without just compensation.
[01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:50.000]  Understood.
[01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  All right.
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  That way I got another paperwork showing that I went through another procedure before...
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  Exactly.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  Exactly.
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:00.000]  I got a question about the COAS part, right?
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:06.000]  I've known how you was always particular about the meanings and definitions of words.
[01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:10.000]  I populated all the definitions in that COAS section together,
[01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  and I started reading them, and I started realizing that they're residential,
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  and when they consider residential as a housing enterprise or a commercial enterprise.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:22.000]  Exactly.
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  So that's it.
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  Exactly.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:28.000]  So what's driving me nuts is like,
[01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:32.000]  how come I could sit in front of these attorneys and I haven't went to school,
[01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  and I try to show them this, and they just say, look at me like I'm nuts?
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  Because you're telling them something they didn't know,
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:46.000]  and they will look like fools for not knowing.
[01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  You get it yet?
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:52.000]  They're not there to benefit you or to uphold the law.
[01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:53.000]  They never read that.
[01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:56.000]  They don't know what's in there, and if they do, they don't care.
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:40:58.000]  Their job is not to solve your problem.
[01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  Their job is to keep the conflict going to generate fees.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:05.000]  If you already have the answer,
[01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:10.000]  and you know what they should be doing to solve the problem based upon that answer,
[01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  they can't get a shitload of money out of you.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  Pardon my French there, Debra.
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  Don't beat me up later.
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:23.000]  But they can't get a carload of money out of you in fees trying to get to railroad you anyway.
[01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:24.000]  I got you.
[01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  So the method that I'm using is correct.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  I'm not insane.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  So that means that with adequate reading and adequate applying procedures with case laws
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  that I already have at hand and with your assistance or whatever,
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  I can go through this procedure of civil suing by myself.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:46.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:49.000]  Just remember that it's suing a governmental entity is difficult.
[01:41:49.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  So make sure you try to find successful suits against municipalities in Tennessee,
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:58.000]  and follow them as much as you can in the course of your events.
[01:41:58.000 --> 01:41:59.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  I filed several of them, appeal it and the Supreme Court of Tennessee.
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:03.000]  Yeah.
[01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:06.000]  You want to read everything that was filed from the original trial
[01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:11.000]  all the way through the appellate decisions all the way up to the Supreme Court if it got that far.
[01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  You want to read everything in that case if that case was successful against that municipality.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:19.000]  You want to see how you have to assert things,
[01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  the phrasing you have to use to do it to make the court recognize the argument.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:27.000]  They love to hear their own words put back in front of them.
[01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:30.000]  It makes them feel important and intelligent.
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  Okay.
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:32.000]  So all right.
[01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:40.000]  So if I do get into the civil court, I use the appellate court cases in the circuit court.
[01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:45.000]  Appellate court cases and above is what sets precedent.
[01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:46.000]  Okay.
[01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:51.000]  So yeah, if they say, well, you can't sue a municipality because objection,
[01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:54.000]  according to the appellate court case, blah, blah, blah,
[01:42:54.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  a municipality can be sued under these conditions, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:01.000]  That condition exists here in this form.
[01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:06.000]  Therefore, you can't say I can't sue because I absolutely can.
[01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  Perfect.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:08.000]  Perfect.
[01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:09.000]  Okay.
[01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:10.000]  All right.
[01:43:10.000 --> 01:43:11.000]  I got that.
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:19.000]  I saw a section where the civil in the TCA code, will those procedures show me how to...
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:25.000]  You will have some form of civil procedure code for courts that deals the things you need to know,
[01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  the rules of procedure, whether it be civil or criminal, and the rules of evidence, which will govern both.
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:32.000]  Yeah.
[01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:33.000]  Okay.
[01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  I saw it.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  Yeah, I've seen them in there.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:37.000]  Yeah, you become an expert in those three things.
[01:43:37.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  You will make every attorney up there run for a hidey hole.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  Okay.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  Thank you.
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  You're welcome.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  Okay.
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  And pardon my French people, just some of this stuff just makes me so mad.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  Sometimes I forget myself.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:53.000]  All right.
[01:43:53.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  Anything else, Oliver?
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:43:57.000]  Well, hang on, and I'll finish you up on the other side of the break.
[01:43:57.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Of course.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:07.000]  It's used by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve.
[01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  What?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:30.000]  All right, folks, we are back, and let's see if we can finish up with Oliver here real quick.
[01:46:30.000 --> 01:46:33.000]  All right, Oliver, anything else you got?
[01:46:33.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  Just about the codes, because I know they always reference some type of plumbing code or international code or something.
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:47.000]  International building code.
[01:46:47.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  Right. Is there some kind of method that I can use to prove that all those are commerce?
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:58.000]  I know they're commerce, but I don't...
[01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  The international building code is not adopted into state law, is it?
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:05.000]  No.
[01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:07.000]  Then who cares?
[01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  That's the argument, that's the rebuttal that I should use once they...
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:21.000]  They say, we adopted the international building code. Well, that may be fine, but can you show me where the Tennessee legislature adopted the international building code as any form of state law?
[01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  Well, they don't have to. We can do it in our ordinances.
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:39.000]  Objection. Can you please show me anywhere where an ordinance is created in accordance with the parameters of the Tennessee Constitution on who has the power to make binding public law and the steps required for that law to be made?
[01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:44.000]  How did the municipality accomplish that?
[01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:48.000]  These are things they will never be able to answer, because they can't.
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:53.000]  So every time they say something that sounds redundant, make them prove it.
[01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:56.000]  Exactly. Every time they say we have the authority, well, where did you get it?
[01:47:56.000 --> 01:47:58.000]  How did you allege that you got it?
[01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:02.000]  Well, we have a city charter. Does the city charter supersede the state constitution?
[01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  No. In fact, your city charter says it must comply with the constitution.
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:10.000]  Yes. Well, then the Constitution says only the legislature has the power to make law?
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:14.000]  Yes. Doesn't it say that there are specific steps in which all state laws must be made?
[01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  Yes. Did you comply with any of those and are you the legislature?
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:22.000]  No. Well, then I guess you didn't make law, did you?
[01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:28.000]  Right. Okay.
[01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:31.000]  Now, say that 10 times fast.
[01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:36.000]  I got to practice. I'm going to have to record it and listen to it again.
[01:48:36.000 --> 01:48:40.000]  I understand everything you said, and it seems very fairly easy to apply.
[01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:42.000]  I've been listening to you for a while.
[01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:48.000]  Common sense is always easy. It's just not always possible.
[01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:53.000]  Right. Okay. I appreciate it, Eddie, and I'm going to...
[01:48:53.000 --> 01:48:54.000]  Okay.
[01:48:54.000 --> 01:48:55.000]  All right. Well, good luck.
[01:48:55.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  I appreciate it. I'm going to use it, and I'm going to get to studying. Thank you.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:00.000]  All right. Go get them.
[01:49:00.000 --> 01:49:01.000]  All right.
[01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:06.000]  All right. Now we've got JD in Texas. JD, what can we do for you?
[01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  Hey, JD. I don't have a question for you, Eddie, necessarily, but I've got a request, if you don't mind.
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  If it's dancing or singing, you better rethink that proposition.
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:21.000]  Oh, man. It's exactly what I had in mind, brother. Come on, man.
[01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:35.000]  Hey, what I had in mind was this. I posted a few things here on Facebook as a response to some things about the patronet ordeal.
[01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  And I'm trying to be quick because I know you're running out of time, and if you have time to speak out or not.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:44.000]  But then it was kind of funny that I spoke about that on Facebook, and then you popped up with the...
[01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:47.000]  Actually, you didn't pop up, but Facebook did it.
[01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  This is, you know, you know how they do those reminders of so many years ago, whatever.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:58.000]  And you post something years back that came up talking about the exact same thing.
[01:49:58.000 --> 01:50:06.000]  And then I get another question about this whole patronet thing again today as someone's asking about that, and I'm trying to do my best to explain it.
[01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:16.000]  My request is this. Would you please spend a few minutes either tonight or on another show, whatever you feel is necessary,
[01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:24.000]  just, you know, to talk about what you mean by patronet and why those methods are wrong and why that...
[01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:34.000]  Because I keep defending, like, I only listen to Eddie Craig and Dave Champion because they back up everything with law,
[01:50:34.000 --> 01:50:43.000]  but all these other folks, they keep coming up with all these magic bullets and these, you know, paperwork affidavits and this and that,
[01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:47.000]  knowing that they've filled out and they've sent it in, I think they can do whatever the hell they want,
[01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:55.000]  and everybody's going to automatically just bow down to them and kiss their butt because they've filled out some stupid piece of paper.
[01:50:55.000 --> 01:51:07.000]  And honestly, I kind of soap in my mouth a little bit when I hear things like sovereign citizen, things like affidavit of truth, strongman,
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  UCC, change your status, all that kind of stuff. Can I get you to just elaborate just a little bit more?
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:22.000]  You can, but that's going to take more time than I got left. I'll see what I can do about that next Monday, if that's all right.
[01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  But all it would really take for people to understand what a patronet is, I coined that term for a reason,
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:39.000]  and the reason was that you have people fomenting all of these legal theories who have never spent a single minute in a courtroom.
[01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:49.000]  They have spent all this time reading all of these acts, but they have spent no time learning how you are required to read them in order to actually understand them.
[01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:55.000]  They have spent no time researching any of the information they're coming up with in relation to them.
[01:51:55.000 --> 01:52:03.000]  They cannot connect the dots themselves, but they will insist the dots are real. Now, that may be true.
[01:52:03.000 --> 01:52:10.000]  They may be real, but how do they help you if you can't put them together and make a reasonable argument out of them?
[01:52:10.000 --> 01:52:18.000]  How do they help you if you can't find where any court or any judge in any place has ever agreed with your analogy?
[01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:28.000]  What good does that do you? Now, the thing is, there are plenty of ways to show that they have agreed with you without actually doing it with plain language,
[01:52:28.000 --> 01:52:38.000]  and that is, let's take the transportation argument, for instance, when the courts continuously revert to referring to the same terminology that comprises the commercial statute.
[01:52:38.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  When they keep saying it's constitutional for the state to regulate a motor vehicle. Judge, no one's arguing that it's not constitutional to regulate a motor vehicle.
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:58.000]  What we are arguing is that a motor vehicle is a specific device to lead to a specific occupation which the state cannot prove I was engaged in or using that device for.
[01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:05.000]  That's the argument. They try to get you to shoehorn back into where they want you instead of where you actually are,
[01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  so that their valid argument relating to the regulation of a motor vehicle seems to apply when it doesn't.
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:22.000]  These are the things that patronuts don't understand. They take them out of context. They read it without reference to the context.
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:32.000]  They take a small blurb here and a small blurb there, and they build this entire theory around it that is completely out of the areas of everything else attached to it,
[01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  as far as the actual law they're dealing with. I call them patronuts because they think they're being patriotic,
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:50.000]  but they're using nutty arguments to say why they're being patriotic and how they should win and why they're free.
[01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:58.000]  Most of it doesn't even make sense in a logical sense, much less a legal sense or a lawful sense.
[01:53:58.000 --> 01:54:04.000]  Right. Well, I think maybe they have the same heart that we got, but they're just going about the wrong way.
[01:54:04.000 --> 01:54:12.000]  But coming to, for example, the translocation code like you talk about, where they misconstrue words,
[01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:19.000]  what I've noticed is every single one of them wants to argue, well, I have a right to travel.
[01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  And going through your course and studying your material, no one has ever argued that you do not have the right to travel.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:33.000]  Exactly. You're not being charged with a violation of any duty under the right to travel.
[01:54:33.000 --> 01:54:41.000]  So the right to travel is completely irrelevant to the allegation against you of being engaged in a commercial activity.
[01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:46.000]  That's the part they're not understanding. It's the part they refuse to see, no matter how much sense it makes.
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:51.000]  No one is charging you with violating a duty under the right to travel.
[01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:56.000]  They're charging you with the violation of a duty to comply with a commercial regulation.
[01:54:56.000 --> 01:55:01.000]  They are not the same thing. They aren't interrelated. They have nothing to do with each other,
[01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:05.000]  which is exactly why it is the wrong argument to make.
[01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:10.000]  Right. I think what it is, I think a lot of them, and correct me if I'm wrong,
[01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:19.000]  I think a lot of them are just looking for what I call myself a magic bullet instead of actually going through the due process of studying
[01:55:19.000 --> 01:55:29.000]  and understanding and learning the process of law and applying it in a proper way, whereas they know it's being misapplied, whatever.
[01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:35.000]  But they just want to see some sort of magical piece of paper that they can fill in,
[01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:41.000]  change your status, or declare this, or declare that, or fill an affidavit of that,
[01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  which you've already cleared an affidavit, is not anything more than just a piece of paper that, unless it's become a misdemeanor in court of.
[01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:55.000]  It has to be introduced as evidence in court and testimony given on it before it matters at all.
[01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:58.000]  Right. Exactly. That's what I'm trying to say, so thank you for that one.
[01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:05.000]  But yeah, they fill out all these affidavits and all this stuff, and they think that they can just do whatever in the hell they want to.
[01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:14.000]  And it's like, I'm trying to, I guess I'm trying to spread the word just a bit about what you're doing.
[01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  But hey, I keep getting my tabs crossed for these patronets that, forgive me for using your terms.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:31.000]  No, that's fine. That's the whole reason I created it. But the point is, is don't let what they're insisting on bother you.
[01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  It's the same thing as so many other things. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:41.000]  You can provide a man with information, but you can't make him understand it or accept it, and so on and so forth.
[01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:46.000]  Everybody's going to self-destruct in their own particular way. It's that simple.
[01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:55.000]  To me, it would be very simple that if someone says, okay, here's the dot you have.
[01:56:55.000 --> 01:57:03.000]  Show me your admissible evidence that makes your dot an actual dot, and then show me how you are going to connect those dots.
[01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:12.000]  You would think that when they cannot do that, they might start to understand that their argument doesn't really have the support they thought it did.
[01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  But that is the other reason why the word nut is on the end of it, because they can't come to that reconciliation, or they refuse to come to that reconciliation.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:34.000]  It's just like the meme that I use in class that's on my computer. In the age of information, ignorance is a choice.
[01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:49.000]  Well, patronuts have made the choice to be ignorant. They are looking for the simple fix rather than the one that the system, as it currently exists, is willing to deal with.
[01:57:49.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  Right, but the one thing I'm asking for is if we can – I don't know how we can do it, but there's people looking for information that they're getting the wrong information.
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:57:58.000]  I know we're going to break, but that's only it.
[01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:01.000]  We're not at a break. We're at the end of the show.
[01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  Well, okay. All right, brother. Hey, Eddie, I appreciate everything, man. We'll talk to you soon.
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:12.000]  All right. For the rest of the callers on the board, I apologize for not being able to get to you before I run out of time.
[01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  That's just the way it works sometimes, especially when I have to keep going back to callers that aren't there just to check on them.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  All right, folks. Thank you all for listening in. And again, I apologize for my slip of the tongue earlier.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  It's just one of those aggravating things that every now and then gets the better of me.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  Y'all have a great week, and I hope everything works out well and in your best interests.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:38.000]  And let's save our country by becoming interested and active in our form of government. Let's fix this.
[01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:43.000]  All right, folks. Y'all have a great week. Good night and God bless.
[01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:49.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.000 --> 02:00:02.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. Logosradionetwork.com.