[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.000 --> 00:27.000]  Markets for Friday, the 3rd of June, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,243.80
[00:27.000 --> 00:35.000]  an ounce, silver $16.39 an ounce, Texas crude $49.17 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:35.000 --> 00:44.000]  steadily rising at $573 U.S. currency.
[00:44.000 --> 00:50.000]  Today in history, the year 1784, the U.S. Army is officially established by the Congress
[00:50.000 --> 00:55.000]  of the Confederation, created to replace the disbanded Continental Army after the Revolutionary
[00:55.000 --> 00:56.000]  War.
[00:56.000 --> 01:01.000]  The U.S. Army was founded today in history.
[01:01.000 --> 01:07.000]  In recent news, the Brussels River, which runs 840 miles across much of the Lone Star
[01:07.000 --> 01:11.000]  State, has already risen to record levels, flooding neighborhoods west of Houston and
[01:11.000 --> 01:15.000]  forcing hundreds of people to evacuate, with worse news coming from the National Weather
[01:15.000 --> 01:19.000]  Service predicting another 4 to 5 inches through the area in the weekend.
[01:19.000 --> 01:23.000]  Just as last April, if you recall, more than 1,000 people were evacuated from northern
[01:23.000 --> 01:25.000]  Houston during another historic flood.
[01:25.000 --> 01:30.000]  In Austin over the weekend, more than 2,000 inmates were evacuated from prisons in low-lying
[01:30.000 --> 01:31.000]  regions.
[01:31.000 --> 01:35.000]  Consider that just two years ago, the Brussels River had run dry in some places due to drought,
[01:35.000 --> 01:37.000]  but is now in an obviously saturated state.
[01:37.000 --> 01:41.000]  A flash flood watch is currently in effect for all of south central Texas, according
[01:41.000 --> 01:45.000]  to the National Weather Service, and a river flood warning is in effect for the Brussels
[01:45.000 --> 01:46.000]  River.
[01:46.000 --> 01:53.000]  A dozen fatalities have been a consequence of this flood.
[01:53.000 --> 01:57.000]  In what can be some of the most eyebrow-raising endorsements for presidential hopefuls in
[01:57.000 --> 02:01.000]  the United States, the president of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, came out and endorsed democratic
[02:01.000 --> 02:06.000]  socialist Bernie Sanders on Tuesday, calling him our revolutionary friend and implying
[02:06.000 --> 02:10.000]  that it is our broken political system as to the reason why Sanders is being marginalized.
[02:10.000 --> 02:15.000]  If that wasn't enough, North Korean state media, DPRK Today, published a column also
[02:15.000 --> 02:19.000]  released on Tuesday which came out and endorsed Republican newcomer Donald Trump, calling
[02:19.000 --> 02:23.000]  him a wise politician and stating that it turns out that Trump is not a rough-talking,
[02:23.000 --> 02:28.000]  screwy, ignorant candidate they say he is, but is actually a wise politician and pristine
[02:28.000 --> 02:29.000]  presidential candidate.
[02:29.000 --> 02:33.000]  As of yet, no authoritarian dictator has come out and endorsed Hillary Clinton, though
[02:33.000 --> 02:37.000]  some suspect this is due to many of them wanting to retain some level of credibility.
[02:37.000 --> 02:41.000]  In what could only be considered ominous omens, it seems that many of black cats are crossing
[02:41.000 --> 02:45.000]  the American people's path to this upcoming presidential election.
[03:11.000 --> 03:22.000]  Really, man, come on Six o'clock noon says somebody been shot
[03:22.000 --> 03:26.000]  Somebody's been abused Somebody blew up a building
[03:26.000 --> 03:30.000]  Somebody stole their car Somebody got away
[03:30.000 --> 03:38.000]  Somebody didn't get too far Yeah, they didn't get too far
[03:38.000 --> 03:46.000]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day, son A man had to answer for the ways that he done
[03:46.000 --> 03:53.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree Round up all of them bad boys in the
[03:53.000 --> 04:01.000]  highest tree For all the people to see
[04:01.000 --> 04:06.000]  And just as there's one thing you should always find You gotta settle up your boys
[04:06.000 --> 04:10.000]  You gotta draw a hard line And the gun smoke settles
[04:10.000 --> 04:17.000]  Just sing a victory tune And we'll all meet back at the local zoo
[04:17.000 --> 04:22.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing
[04:22.000 --> 04:27.000]  Whiskey for my man, beer for my horses
[04:27.000 --> 04:29.000]  All right, folks, good evening.
[04:29.000 --> 04:33.000]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:33.000 --> 04:37.000]  It is June 6th, 2016.
[04:37.000 --> 04:44.000]  Now, if you haven't figured out yet why I chose that particular song to open this show with,
[04:44.000 --> 04:50.000]  then you are not listening to that initial set of verses carefully.
[04:50.000 --> 04:56.000]  Because everything those verses are talking about is the remaining solution that I believe
[04:56.000 --> 05:01.000]  we actually have to regaining control of our government.
[05:01.000 --> 05:07.000]  And it will have to begin and end with taking all of those bad boys out in the street
[05:07.000 --> 05:10.000]  and hanging them high for all the people to see.
[05:10.000 --> 05:15.000]  That's exactly what this is going to wind up taking the way things are going.
[05:15.000 --> 05:21.000]  Now, the thing I want to talk about tonight is going to be specifically directed at you folks
[05:21.000 --> 05:26.000]  in California and those of you that are in similar states where traffic infractions
[05:26.000 --> 05:33.000]  and the courts that handle them are civil administrative issues.
[05:33.000 --> 05:37.000]  Now, California has this problem where it can't make up its damned mind
[05:37.000 --> 05:41.000]  whether the courts are supposed to treat these as civil or criminal,
[05:41.000 --> 05:45.000]  at least when you're talking to the administrative hearing officer.
[05:45.000 --> 05:51.000]  Their third court of appeals has already set precedent for this no less than three times,
[05:51.000 --> 05:57.000]  and it has contradicted itself one of those times and gone the opposite way.
[05:57.000 --> 06:06.000]  So right now the score even for the appellate court on this issue is two for civil and one for criminal.
[06:06.000 --> 06:11.000]  So right now the preponderance of the case law says California traffic citations
[06:11.000 --> 06:15.000]  are civil administrative functions.
[06:15.000 --> 06:20.000]  Being civil, they of course have no criminal elements.
[06:20.000 --> 06:26.000]  Having no criminal elements, a seizure by a peace officer for the purpose of detaining you
[06:26.000 --> 06:33.000]  and arresting you for the purpose of issuing that citation is absolutely illegal.
[06:33.000 --> 06:39.000]  The problem is somehow the people of California that are listening to this show
[06:39.000 --> 06:44.000]  and fighting these tickets aren't seeming to get the issue here.
[06:44.000 --> 06:48.000]  So tonight I'm going to tell you about two articles that are on my blog,
[06:48.000 --> 06:51.000]  one of which I just posted yesterday or the day before,
[06:51.000 --> 06:57.000]  and that one is called Why California Should Be Allowed to Slide Off into the Ocean,
[06:57.000 --> 07:02.000]  and the one prior to that is civil infractions and what to do about them if your state has them.
[07:02.000 --> 07:07.000]  These two articles go hand in hand to deal specifically with the kinds of issues
[07:07.000 --> 07:13.000]  that are going on in California and other states where people are getting stopped by an officer
[07:13.000 --> 07:18.000]  and seized in their liberty without a warrant and without probable cause
[07:18.000 --> 07:24.000]  so that they can issue these revenue generating citations that are civil in nature.
[07:24.000 --> 07:30.000]  Now someone sent me a link to a video that deals with exactly one of these cases
[07:30.000 --> 07:34.000]  as recorded in one of these California courts, and it's all audio,
[07:34.000 --> 07:38.000]  but the things that are going on in that audio are absolutely infuriating
[07:38.000 --> 07:43.000]  when you know that the person speaking, the administrative hearing officer,
[07:43.000 --> 07:52.000]  is lying through their teeth and intentionally violating the rights of the accused in this matter.
[07:52.000 --> 07:56.000]  Now I listened to this video recording or this audio recording carefully.
[07:56.000 --> 07:57.000]  I made notes about it.
[07:57.000 --> 08:00.000]  I went and looked at the comments that were posted on YouTube about it,
[08:00.000 --> 08:04.000]  and as usual the morons and statists were crawling out of the woodwork,
[08:04.000 --> 08:08.000]  throwing all kinds of legal theories and, oh, you got what you deserved out of it
[08:08.000 --> 08:14.000]  without having a real clue at all about what the hell they're talking about.
[08:14.000 --> 08:20.000]  Now the article that I just posted basically gives you 10 specific questions or statements
[08:20.000 --> 08:26.000]  to be asking this administrative hearing officer through the course of these proceedings.
[08:26.000 --> 08:31.000]  And of course, as always, the very first thing out of your mouth
[08:31.000 --> 08:36.000]  when you go into one of these courts is I am here by special appearance
[08:36.000 --> 08:39.000]  to challenge the jurisdiction of these proceedings.
[08:39.000 --> 08:46.000]  Don't even say here until you have made this statement, okay?
[08:46.000 --> 08:53.000]  If you say anything at all prior to reserving your right of special appearance
[08:53.000 --> 08:58.000]  to challenge impersonal jurisdiction, you have waived it.
[08:58.000 --> 09:01.000]  Am I clear on that?
[09:01.000 --> 09:04.000]  So don't do it.
[09:04.000 --> 09:08.000]  The second thing that I would have been asking this administrative hearing officer,
[09:08.000 --> 09:11.000]  had I been the one in this case, would have been,
[09:11.000 --> 09:17.000]  are you presiding over this proceeding in the capacity of a sworn judicial officer
[09:17.000 --> 09:20.000]  of the state of California?
[09:20.000 --> 09:25.000]  Of course, the answer to that is either going to be a lie or no if they're telling the truth,
[09:25.000 --> 09:27.000]  because they're not.
[09:27.000 --> 09:31.000]  They are not real judicial officers.
[09:31.000 --> 09:37.000]  Now, for those of you that don't know, my blog is located at dowoflaw.wordpress.com.
[09:37.000 --> 09:40.000]  And the Dow is T-A-O, not D-A-O.
[09:40.000 --> 09:44.000]  That's just the proper pronunciation from the Chinese, okay?
[09:44.000 --> 09:48.000]  Dowoflaw.wordpress.com.
[09:48.000 --> 09:52.000]  All right, number three of what I would have asked,
[09:52.000 --> 09:56.000]  is the nature of this matter alleged to be civil or criminal?
[09:56.000 --> 09:58.000]  I know the answer to this question,
[09:58.000 --> 10:05.000]  and the thing is that you should never ask a question you don't already know the answer to.
[10:05.000 --> 10:06.000]  Okay?
[10:06.000 --> 10:08.000]  Be aware of that.
[10:08.000 --> 10:13.000]  They're going to, of course, tell you whatever they want to tell you.
[10:13.000 --> 10:15.000]  If they tell you it's criminal, that's a lie.
[10:15.000 --> 10:19.000]  If they tell you it's civil, they are correct.
[10:19.000 --> 10:25.000]  But we're going to address what happens if they tell you it's criminal.
[10:25.000 --> 10:32.000]  Number four, by what lawful authority do you presume to act by both ignoring
[10:32.000 --> 10:37.000]  and overruling the judicial decisions of the California Third Court of Appeals,
[10:37.000 --> 10:42.000]  who has specifically ruled on no less than three separate occasions
[10:42.000 --> 10:48.000]  that traffic infractions in the state of California are not crimes?
[10:48.000 --> 10:52.000]  And we have the three individual cases right there in that,
[10:52.000 --> 10:57.000]  and I linked copies of those cases into the article with the links that you see there.
[10:57.000 --> 10:59.000]  All right?
[10:59.000 --> 11:04.000]  Number five, if this case is criminal, as you allege,
[11:04.000 --> 11:07.000]  now before I get into five, let me explain something else.
[11:07.000 --> 11:14.000]  In California, you are not allowed a jury trial in these cases,
[11:14.000 --> 11:18.000]  which if it is truly criminal, is a due process violation.
[11:18.000 --> 11:23.000]  Okay? And I'll get into the details when I ask five to exactly why that is.
[11:23.000 --> 11:26.000]  But you are not allowed a jury trial.
[11:26.000 --> 11:30.000]  This is all done completely administratively without a jury.
[11:30.000 --> 11:33.000]  When they tell you you have no right to a jury trial,
[11:33.000 --> 11:38.000]  that is a dead-bank guarantee this is not a criminal case.
[11:38.000 --> 11:39.000]  Okay?
[11:39.000 --> 11:44.000]  No matter what this idiot tells you, it's not a criminal case
[11:44.000 --> 11:51.000]  because you have a protected, guaranteed right to a jury in a criminal proceeding.
[11:51.000 --> 11:53.000]  How do we know this?
[11:53.000 --> 11:55.000]  Well, let's ask number five.
[11:55.000 --> 11:58.000]  If this case is criminal, as you allege,
[11:58.000 --> 12:04.000]  then I demand my inviolate right to a trial by jury as guaranteed and protected
[12:04.000 --> 12:10.000]  by Article 1, Section 16 of the California Constitution's Declaration of Rights,
[12:10.000 --> 12:14.000]  my rights.
[12:14.000 --> 12:16.000]  Number six.
[12:16.000 --> 12:32.000]  Furthermore, if this case is truly criminal, then I demand my inviolate right to be provided
[12:32.000 --> 12:36.000]  with assistance of counsel as guaranteed and protected by Article 1,
[12:36.000 --> 12:41.000]  Section 15 of the California Constitution's Declaration of Rights.
[12:41.000 --> 12:43.000]  Number seven.
[12:43.000 --> 12:49.000]  By what lawful authority do you presume to act in denying me in any fundamental right
[12:49.000 --> 12:52.000]  that is protected and guaranteed as inviolate
[12:52.000 --> 12:57.000]  by the provisions of the California Constitution's Declaration of Rights?
[12:57.000 --> 12:59.000]  Now, of course, these questions are all presuming
[12:59.000 --> 13:03.000]  that the administrative hearing officer is continuing to lie to you
[13:03.000 --> 13:10.000]  and circumvent your right of due process and deny you these rights that the California
[13:10.000 --> 13:15.000]  Constitution's Declaration of Rights says are inviolate.
[13:15.000 --> 13:20.000]  They cannot take them away from you.
[13:20.000 --> 13:26.000]  Not if this is a criminal proceeding like they're trying to tell you that it is.
[13:26.000 --> 13:29.000]  These things go hand in hand.
[13:29.000 --> 13:32.000]  You tell me I'm not entitled to a jury trial in this case.
[13:32.000 --> 13:35.000]  Therefore, this case cannot possibly be criminal
[13:35.000 --> 13:42.000]  because I have an absolutely guaranteed protected right to a jury if it is criminal.
[13:42.000 --> 13:50.000]  I have an absolute guaranteed right to assistance of counsel if it is criminal.
[13:50.000 --> 13:55.000]  I can find no authority whatsoever for you or any other judge in this state
[13:55.000 --> 14:01.000]  to throw the Declaration of Rights out the window and deny me access to it.
[14:01.000 --> 14:07.000]  So by what authority do you pretend to do so?
[14:07.000 --> 14:10.000]  Number eight, objection.
[14:10.000 --> 14:15.000]  No judge in any court operating under the laws and Constitution of the state of California
[14:15.000 --> 14:21.000]  has any more authority to ignore or deny the accused in violent protections and guarantees
[14:21.000 --> 14:26.000]  as written into the California Constitution's Declaration of Rights than you do,
[14:26.000 --> 14:30.000]  which is to say none at all.
[14:30.000 --> 14:35.000]  Nine, I must inform you that your actions in this proceeding are not only criminal
[14:35.000 --> 14:39.000]  and civilly actionable, but also border on sedition and treason,
[14:39.000 --> 14:49.000]  and therefore I hereby move that you be disqualified and remove yourself from these proceedings.
[14:49.000 --> 14:53.000]  Ten, if you refuse to remove yourself, you will leave me with no alternative
[14:53.000 --> 14:57.000]  but to file criminal charges in a civil rights violation suit
[14:57.000 --> 15:03.000]  against you personally for your actions here today.
[15:03.000 --> 15:10.000]  Now, you have a protected right to say and do every single one of those things right there.
[15:10.000 --> 15:11.000]  Okay?
[15:11.000 --> 15:13.000]  Every one of them.
[15:13.000 --> 15:17.000]  The California Constitution says so.
[15:17.000 --> 15:24.000]  No court, no judge, no one in California has the authority to ignore the Constitution
[15:24.000 --> 15:28.000]  that gave them the power to act in the first place.
[15:28.000 --> 15:30.000]  None of them.
[15:30.000 --> 15:33.000]  You need to stop acting like they do.
[15:33.000 --> 15:39.000]  You need to stop letting them act like they do.
[15:39.000 --> 15:46.000]  Now, most of the comments on this on the YouTube channel were just blatantly outrageous
[15:46.000 --> 15:50.000]  as far as the statist attitude of you got what you deserve, man.
[15:50.000 --> 15:52.000]  You think you know more than the judge, man.
[15:52.000 --> 15:54.000]  In this particular case, the kid did.
[15:54.000 --> 15:58.000]  He just didn't know enough to control him.
[15:58.000 --> 16:04.000]  He was right, but he wasn't right with authority.
[16:04.000 --> 16:09.000]  He couldn't and didn't, if he could, cite any authority
[16:09.000 --> 16:13.000]  for his demands of this administrative hearing officer.
[16:13.000 --> 16:16.000]  Remember, this guy is not a judge.
[16:16.000 --> 16:20.000]  None of these people conducting these cases are judges.
[16:20.000 --> 16:23.000]  There's nothing judicial about it.
[16:23.000 --> 16:28.000]  That means they have zero immunity for what they do
[16:28.000 --> 16:38.000]  because everything they're doing is administrative, i.e., it is magisterial, not judicial.
[16:38.000 --> 16:42.000]  Now, you couple these ten statements and questions
[16:42.000 --> 16:47.000]  in with the seven interrogatories in your discovery for the purpose of your case,
[16:47.000 --> 16:51.000]  and you've got this administrative hearing officer locked into a corner
[16:51.000 --> 16:54.000]  he is never easily going to get out of.
[16:54.000 --> 16:56.000]  You just have to fight to keep him there.
[16:56.000 --> 16:58.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of All Radio.
[16:58.000 --> 17:02.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:02.000 --> 17:06.000]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network?
[17:06.000 --> 17:10.000]  On top of the on-air talents, producers, and other hardworking individuals
[17:10.000 --> 17:13.000]  working behind the scenes, Logos Radio Network is kept on the air
[17:13.000 --> 17:16.000]  by the generous support of listeners like you.
[17:16.000 --> 17:19.000]  We appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year
[17:19.000 --> 17:22.000]  on our annual fundraisers, which help keep the lights on
[17:22.000 --> 17:24.000]  and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[17:24.000 --> 17:27.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution.
[17:27.000 --> 17:32.000]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Go-Works.
[17:32.000 --> 17:35.000]  First prize being a Spice Skull Lower Receiver,
[17:35.000 --> 17:37.000]  second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[17:37.000 --> 17:39.000]  Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Vapor.
[17:39.000 --> 17:42.000]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough,
[17:42.000 --> 17:45.000]  you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud,
[17:45.000 --> 17:50.000]  donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[17:50.000 --> 17:52.000]  The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser.
[17:52.000 --> 17:55.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information
[17:55.000 --> 18:00.000]  and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:14.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:14.000 --> 18:20.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:20.000 --> 18:24.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons,
[18:24.000 --> 18:26.000]  how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:26.000 --> 18:29.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports,
[18:29.000 --> 18:33.000]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:46.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[18:46.000 --> 18:49.000]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 18:51.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:51.000 --> 19:01.000]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:04.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:04.000 --> 19:09.000]  Logosradionetwork.com.
[19:09.000 --> 19:29.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[19:29.000 --> 19:31.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:31.000 --> 19:37.000]  The call-in number, if you want to call in and get in line, is 512-646-1984.
[19:37.000 --> 19:42.000]  Now, real quick, I need to go into the seven interrogatories that are in the other article
[19:42.000 --> 19:47.000]  that go hand in hand with the ten statements and questions that I just read to you.
[19:47.000 --> 19:53.000]  Now, these interrogatories are very specifically worded.
[19:53.000 --> 20:00.000]  If you use them, do not change them except specifically in the two places
[20:00.000 --> 20:04.000]  where you have been instructed in the article to do so.
[20:04.000 --> 20:10.000]  Okay? It is very important the language you use to ask these questions.
[20:10.000 --> 20:13.000]  You get a slippery lawyer that wants to play word games,
[20:13.000 --> 20:17.000]  and you've used words he can play with, he will.
[20:17.000 --> 20:19.000]  So don't give it to him.
[20:19.000 --> 20:22.000]  Don't change anything in these seven interrogatories
[20:22.000 --> 20:26.000]  except for what I have specifically instructed you to.
[20:26.000 --> 20:32.000]  But you use these in your discovery process as a motion for interrogatories.
[20:32.000 --> 20:35.000]  If this is civil, this is very applicable to the case.
[20:35.000 --> 20:37.000]  Okay?
[20:37.000 --> 20:42.000]  Now, I've got a colorful name in here for the officer,
[20:42.000 --> 20:45.000]  but I'll change it a little bit for the purpose of reading it on the air.
[20:45.000 --> 20:48.000]  But in any case, these are your seven interrogatories.
[20:48.000 --> 20:51.000]  And after I read them to you, I'll read the explanation for them
[20:51.000 --> 20:56.000]  so you'll understand why these interrogatories are worded to do what they do.
[20:56.000 --> 21:02.000]  Number one, is the allegation being made considered to be a civil infraction
[21:02.000 --> 21:06.000]  under California law?
[21:06.000 --> 21:12.000]  Number two, can a warrantless arrest or detention be lawfully perpetrated
[21:12.000 --> 21:17.000]  in relation to a civil matter under California law?
[21:17.000 --> 21:21.000]  Three, may a warrant of arrest be obtained
[21:21.000 --> 21:26.000]  without a valid statement of probable cause under California law?
[21:26.000 --> 21:31.000]  Four, under California law is a statement of probable cause
[21:31.000 --> 21:34.000]  sufficient to obtain a warrant of arrest
[21:34.000 --> 21:38.000]  if it does not allege that an actual crime was perpetrated
[21:38.000 --> 21:44.000]  by the person named or described therein to be arrested?
[21:44.000 --> 21:52.000]  Five, under California law, did Officer Moron witness any actual crime
[21:52.000 --> 21:56.000]  that would have provided him or her with the required reasonable suspicion
[21:56.000 --> 21:59.000]  or articulable probable cause
[21:59.000 --> 22:04.000]  authorizing a warrantless detention or arrest of an individual?
[22:04.000 --> 22:11.000]  Under California law, did Officer Moron witness any actual crime
[22:11.000 --> 22:15.000]  that would have provided him or her with the required probable cause necessary
[22:15.000 --> 22:18.000]  to state sufficient grounds of criminal activity
[22:18.000 --> 22:21.000]  in order for a duly authorized magistrate
[22:21.000 --> 22:25.000]  to issue a warrant of arrest for an individual?
[22:25.000 --> 22:30.000]  Seven, was Officer Moron in possession of a valid warrant of arrest
[22:30.000 --> 22:35.000]  for a male or female suspect using the name, whatever your name is,
[22:35.000 --> 22:38.000]  or that contained an adequate physical description
[22:38.000 --> 22:42.000]  that allowed the officer to identify and apprehend the individual accused
[22:42.000 --> 22:46.000]  in this civil infraction?
[22:46.000 --> 22:50.000]  Now, the whole purpose of these seven interrogatories is very, very simple
[22:50.000 --> 22:55.000]  when the matter is a civil infraction that is to be treated as a civil case,
[22:55.000 --> 22:59.000]  not a criminal case, and this is what it is.
[22:59.000 --> 23:03.000]  The point of the interrogatories is to show that the warrantless detention
[23:03.000 --> 23:07.000]  or arrest of the individual by the officer was both completely unlawful
[23:07.000 --> 23:12.000]  and illegal because there could never have been any reasonable suspicion
[23:12.000 --> 23:17.000]  or probable cause associated with the warrantless seizure of the accused
[23:17.000 --> 23:23.000]  for a civil infraction, making anything that was obtained or discovered
[23:23.000 --> 23:28.000]  by the officer during the detention or arrest for any purpose
[23:28.000 --> 23:32.000]  inadmissible under the Fruit of the Poison Tree doctrine.
[23:32.000 --> 23:36.000]  Therefore, there is no evidence or testimony that can be made,
[23:36.000 --> 23:41.000]  no proof that can be offered, thus no case of controversy before the court
[23:41.000 --> 23:43.000]  or, in this case, the tribunal.
[23:43.000 --> 23:48.000]  No case or controversy, no jurisdiction of any kind.
[23:48.000 --> 23:51.000]  That's the simple logic of the whole thing.
[23:51.000 --> 23:55.000]  In stateless civil infractions, this is your case.
[23:55.000 --> 23:58.000]  This is how you control the hearing officer.
[23:58.000 --> 24:02.000]  This is how you get the evidence that the prosecutor otherwise is going to
[24:02.000 --> 24:07.000]  attempt to hide if there's a prosecutor at all or that the judge is going to
[24:07.000 --> 24:12.000]  attempt to ignore in order to get away with falsely convicting you
[24:12.000 --> 24:14.000]  and taking your money.
[24:14.000 --> 24:20.000]  So you folks in California, Washington, and Oregon and other places where
[24:20.000 --> 24:25.000]  these are civil infractions rather than criminal misdemeanors,
[24:25.000 --> 24:30.000]  this is how you put up a defense and this is how you control the proceeding.
[24:30.000 --> 24:37.000]  It shouldn't be difficult as long as you do it and don't back down from doing it.
[24:37.000 --> 24:38.000]  Okay?
[24:38.000 --> 24:41.000]  You're the only one that can protect your rights.
[24:41.000 --> 24:43.000]  You're the only one that wants to protect your rights.
[24:43.000 --> 24:45.000]  Trust me on that.
[24:45.000 --> 24:50.000]  Your money is too important to them for them to care whether your rights are
[24:50.000 --> 24:54.000]  protected or not because if they cared about your rights,
[24:54.000 --> 24:57.000]  this would have never been a law.
[24:57.000 --> 24:59.000]  Okay?
[24:59.000 --> 25:00.000]  All right.
[25:00.000 --> 25:03.000]  That being said, let's get on with our callers if we've got enough time here.
[25:03.000 --> 25:04.000]  Let's see.
[25:04.000 --> 25:06.000]  We've got five minutes, so we'll start with the first one.
[25:06.000 --> 25:11.000]  Stephen, what can we do for you?
[25:11.000 --> 25:14.000]  Hello?
[25:14.000 --> 25:16.000]  Yeah.
[25:16.000 --> 25:20.000]  I was on vacation in Florida at a vacation spot and visiting.
[25:20.000 --> 25:25.000]  My parents retired down here.
[25:25.000 --> 25:30.000]  I was told by these guys in colorful soccer shirts like red,
[25:30.000 --> 25:35.000]  white and blue and purple and green striped shirts on bicycles that came up
[25:35.000 --> 25:40.000]  real fast and aggressive, give me your ID.
[25:40.000 --> 25:46.000]  We had a call of domestic violence and give me your ID and about five seconds
[25:46.000 --> 25:53.000]  later they pulled my shirt over my head and my arms were in it and my head was
[25:53.000 --> 25:59.000]  in it and they used my hands that were tied up in the shirt to swing it towards
[25:59.000 --> 26:02.000]  one officer and they said, oh, he's just hit me in the face.
[26:02.000 --> 26:06.000]  He's just hit me in the face and then they pulled the pepper spray out and then
[26:06.000 --> 26:12.000]  they sprayed me and my wife and said, no, no, what are you doing?
[26:12.000 --> 26:14.000]  Who are you?
[26:14.000 --> 26:15.000]  What are you doing?
[26:15.000 --> 26:20.000]  And they sprayed her and then they chased me and then they reckoned me to
[26:20.000 --> 26:25.000]  ground and took us in for four nights jail without ever giving us Miranda
[26:25.000 --> 26:27.000]  rights or explaining anything to them.
[26:27.000 --> 26:29.000]  I never gave them any statement.
[26:29.000 --> 26:30.000]  My wife gave them a statement.
[26:30.000 --> 26:32.000]  Her statement was, no, he's my husband.
[26:32.000 --> 26:34.000]  I wasn't trying to get away from him.
[26:34.000 --> 26:38.000]  No, we weren't in a domestic violence situation.
[26:38.000 --> 26:39.000]  This is a big mistake.
[26:39.000 --> 26:47.000]  Apparently someone had seen us at a crosswalk and had my wife, had my arm
[26:47.000 --> 26:51.000]  around her and she stepped down to the curb because she was looking at her
[26:51.000 --> 26:54.000]  cell phone and I pulled her back up with my shoulder.
[26:54.000 --> 26:56.000]  The woman said, is he controlling you?
[26:56.000 --> 26:58.000]  Was he violating and abusing you?
[26:58.000 --> 27:01.000]  Do you want me to call 911 and get you away from him?
[27:01.000 --> 27:02.000]  My wife said, no.
[27:02.000 --> 27:10.000]  And I said, we've been happily married for a decade and this is not what you
[27:10.000 --> 27:12.000]  are saying it is.
[27:12.000 --> 27:20.000]  I'm offended that you bumped into our personal business and her husband
[27:20.000 --> 27:24.000]  behind her didn't buzz or wasn't affected by what I said and the tone that
[27:24.000 --> 27:26.000]  I said because it was pretty respectful.
[27:26.000 --> 27:30.000]  I might have even said with all due respect ma'am, but she dialed 911
[27:30.000 --> 27:36.000]  apparently and these bicycle cops, I guess, never identified themselves as
[27:36.000 --> 27:38.000]  law enforcement agents or showed any ID.
[27:38.000 --> 27:43.000]  It was a dark alley and they started beating me after five seconds.
[27:43.000 --> 27:47.000]  Do you have video and audio that will prove that?
[27:47.000 --> 27:51.000]  Were they wearing body cams and body microphones?
[27:51.000 --> 27:54.000]  I believe they were not at all.
[27:54.000 --> 27:56.000]  Then you might have a problem.
[27:56.000 --> 28:00.000]  You need to check and see if there's any sort of security camera footage that
[28:00.000 --> 28:04.000]  covers that alley, any business may have it monitored, anybody's got a security
[28:04.000 --> 28:09.000]  system on their balcony or whatever that monitors it, you need to be looking for
[28:09.000 --> 28:14.000]  video sources because without that video source in Florida, Florida is one of
[28:14.000 --> 28:17.000]  those places where the cop is always right no matter how wrong he is and no
[28:17.000 --> 28:19.000]  matter what there is to prove it.
[28:19.000 --> 28:23.000]  Without that video, this is going to be not an uphill battle, this is going to
[28:23.000 --> 28:27.000]  be Skell and Everest on the steep side with no rope.
[28:27.000 --> 28:29.000]  Okay.
[28:29.000 --> 28:32.000]  My wife and I, of course, were in jail.
[28:32.000 --> 28:37.000]  Yeah, the problem is you can't really vindicate each other as witnesses because
[28:37.000 --> 28:41.000]  both of you were being arrested and treated that way.
[28:41.000 --> 28:45.000]  Therefore, both of you are guilty in everybody's eyes for anything they want to
[28:45.000 --> 28:49.000]  say you're guilty for until there's countermanding evidence that they can't
[28:49.000 --> 28:51.000]  refute.
[28:51.000 --> 28:53.000]  Okay.
[28:53.000 --> 28:57.000]  When we retained an attorney, when the attorney said they have a witness already
[28:57.000 --> 29:02.000]  that's willing to say that the officer treated us like the officers were dicks
[29:02.000 --> 29:03.000]  the whole time.
[29:03.000 --> 29:10.000]  Yeah, but the thing is, okay, the attitude is not supporting your version of the
[29:10.000 --> 29:11.000]  facts.
[29:11.000 --> 29:16.000]  Saying that the officers were so-called dicks for the term of the altercation is
[29:16.000 --> 29:21.000]  not testimony that, yeah, the officers are dicks for five seconds and then they
[29:21.000 --> 29:24.000]  jump on the guy and start beating and tasing him.
[29:24.000 --> 29:25.000]  You see the difference?
[29:25.000 --> 29:27.000]  Yeah, yeah.
[29:27.000 --> 29:28.000]  Okay.
[29:28.000 --> 29:29.000]  Exactly.
[29:29.000 --> 29:31.000]  And also they said I walked away.
[29:31.000 --> 29:33.000]  They said that we grabbed them.
[29:33.000 --> 29:35.000]  All these things are made up.
[29:35.000 --> 29:40.000]  We didn't do anything, but I raised my hands a little bit.
[29:40.000 --> 29:41.000]  Okay.
[29:41.000 --> 29:42.000]  Well, hang on, Stephen.
[29:42.000 --> 29:44.000]  I've got to take a break here and we'll pick you up when we get back on the
[29:44.000 --> 29:45.000]  other side.
[29:45.000 --> 29:46.000]  So hold on just a minute.
[29:46.000 --> 29:47.000]  All right, folks.
[29:47.000 --> 29:48.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[29:48.000 --> 29:52.000]  The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[29:52.000 --> 29:54.000]  We'll be right back after the break.
[29:54.000 --> 30:02.000]  Give us a call, get in line, and let's talk.
[30:02.000 --> 30:04.000]  Move over, beef, lamb, and pork.
[30:04.000 --> 30:08.000]  There's a new kid on the block and it's taking America by storm.
[30:08.000 --> 30:11.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with a tender,
[30:11.000 --> 30:14.000]  juicy morsel on the latest in carnivore cuisine.
[30:14.000 --> 30:16.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:16.000 --> 30:20.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.000 --> 30:24.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish,
[30:24.000 --> 30:25.000]  too.
[30:25.000 --> 30:26.000]  So protect your rights.
[30:26.000 --> 30:30.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.000 --> 30:32.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:32.000 --> 30:36.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:36.000 --> 30:40.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:40.000 --> 30:43.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:43.000 --> 30:47.000]  It's lean, it's trendy, and it isn't half bad.
[30:47.000 --> 30:50.000]  Goat meat, it's fall off the fork tender and buttery when it's properly
[30:50.000 --> 30:53.000]  marinated and grilled or braised, and it's not gamey.
[30:53.000 --> 30:57.000]  In fact, some gourmets say goat meat is perhaps the most flavorful meat on
[30:57.000 --> 30:58.000]  the planet.
[30:58.000 --> 31:02.000]  Word's gotten out, and goat meat, also called chivon or cabrito, is finding
[31:02.000 --> 31:06.000]  its way to the menus of high-end U.S. restaurants, and it may soon be at
[31:06.000 --> 31:08.000]  your local grocery store.
[31:08.000 --> 31:11.000]  Goat meat may be new to Americans, but it's long been considered a staple of
[31:11.000 --> 31:13.000]  third-world countries.
[31:13.000 --> 31:17.000]  In fact, it's estimated that 63% of red meat consumed in the world is goat
[31:17.000 --> 31:18.000]  meat.
[31:18.000 --> 31:19.000]  No kidding.
[31:19.000 --> 31:21.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:21.000 --> 31:30.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.000 --> 31:34.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of
[31:34.000 --> 31:35.000]  September 11.
[31:35.000 --> 31:37.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:37.000 --> 31:42.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled
[31:42.000 --> 31:43.000]  demolition.
[31:43.000 --> 31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:46.000 --> 31:48.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[31:48.000 --> 31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.000 --> 31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:52.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.000 --> 31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.000 --> 31:57.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:57.000 --> 32:02.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.000 --> 32:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.000 --> 32:07.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:07.000 --> 32:10.000]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going
[32:10.000 --> 32:12.000]  to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.000 --> 32:15.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the
[32:15.000 --> 32:18.000]  right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to
[32:18.000 --> 32:19.000]  due process of law.
[32:19.000 --> 32:22.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to
[32:22.000 --> 32:25.000]  enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.000 --> 32:28.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:28.000 --> 32:31.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help
[32:31.000 --> 32:35.000]  you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.000 --> 32:37.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to
[32:37.000 --> 32:40.000]  ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation
[32:43.000 --> 32:47.000]  Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:47.000 --> 32:50.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.000 --> 32:52.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from
[32:52.000 --> 32:54.000]  ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.000 --> 32:57.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want
[32:57.000 --> 33:02.000]  and deserve.
[33:02.000 --> 33:12.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:12.000 --> 33:32.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:32.000 --> 33:42.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[34:02.000 --> 34:12.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[34:12.000 --> 34:15.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[34:15.000 --> 34:19.000]  All right, we are talking with Stephen, who I am assuming from the descriptors
[34:19.000 --> 34:22.000]  he's using is currently in Florida, even though he may not live there.
[34:22.000 --> 34:26.000]  Stephen, go ahead.
[34:26.000 --> 34:33.000]  May I contact you off the air to see if I could retain you as my attorney?
[34:33.000 --> 34:36.000]  No, because one, I'm not an attorney.
[34:36.000 --> 34:38.000]  Two, I'm not in Florida.
[34:38.000 --> 34:43.000]  Three, they will never allow a non-attorney to be your anything.
[34:43.000 --> 34:48.000]  Now, you can ask me questions offline all you want to, but I can't be your
[34:48.000 --> 34:50.000]  attorney.
[34:50.000 --> 34:51.000]  Gotcha.
[34:51.000 --> 34:55.000]  How should I control my attorney that's been retained?
[34:55.000 --> 34:58.000]  Well, the first thing is you need to figure out what the rules or procedure for
[34:58.000 --> 35:03.000]  the type of court you're going to be in are and study up on them so that you
[35:03.000 --> 35:07.000]  know what this attorney should be doing for you, what your rights are under
[35:07.000 --> 35:13.000]  the Constitution in that state particularly, as well as your own, you
[35:13.000 --> 35:17.000]  know, and basically what the law is they're charging you with violating.
[35:17.000 --> 35:19.000]  You know every word in it better than they do.
[35:19.000 --> 35:25.000]  Find out what every phrase and term in it means under their statutes and then
[35:25.000 --> 35:30.000]  see where it doesn't apply to you in that criteria and so on and so forth.
[35:30.000 --> 35:31.000]  Okay?
[35:31.000 --> 35:34.000]  In other words, you better become your own best attorney.
[35:34.000 --> 35:37.000]  You better know at least as much about this case as the guy that's representing
[35:37.000 --> 35:39.000]  you.
[35:39.000 --> 35:41.000]  Okay.
[35:41.000 --> 35:46.000]  And, Mr. Craig, there was a story published about me in a local paper, and
[35:46.000 --> 35:49.000]  it was very, what do you call it?
[35:49.000 --> 35:50.000]  Non-flattering?
[35:50.000 --> 35:53.000]  Yes, non-flattering.
[35:53.000 --> 35:58.000]  Said a couple turns on local law enforcement and it went on to state some of
[35:58.000 --> 36:01.000]  the, you know, things are in the report.
[36:01.000 --> 36:02.000]  Okay.
[36:02.000 --> 36:03.000]  I've got the report.
[36:03.000 --> 36:04.000]  Yeah.
[36:04.000 --> 36:05.000]  All right.
[36:05.000 --> 36:06.000]  Well, see, that's the thing.
[36:06.000 --> 36:12.000]  If the paper is using the report as its source, then you can't go after the
[36:12.000 --> 36:16.000]  paper because they're printing unless, of course, the facts the paper printed
[36:16.000 --> 36:20.000]  are not the same facts that are in the report.
[36:20.000 --> 36:24.000]  Now, if they stuck straight to what's in the report, you can't touch the paper.
[36:24.000 --> 36:27.000]  They're using an official document as their source.
[36:27.000 --> 36:32.000]  They're not liable for anything.
[36:32.000 --> 36:33.000]  Okay.
[36:33.000 --> 36:42.000]  And another thing is what about in order for me to, like, go back to continue
[36:42.000 --> 36:44.000]  my job after my short vacation.
[36:44.000 --> 36:48.000]  Well, good luck with that if they're charging you with felonies.
[36:48.000 --> 36:52.000]  What's going to happen is if your company or business finds out that you've
[36:52.000 --> 36:57.000]  been charged with a bunch of felonies, they're likely to terminate you ASAP.
[36:57.000 --> 36:58.000]  Uh-huh.
[36:58.000 --> 36:59.000]  Okay.
[36:59.000 --> 37:02.000]  Now, that's something you can sue over, but that ain't going to help you with
[37:02.000 --> 37:05.000]  that in the meantime, and it may prevent you from being able to complete this
[37:05.000 --> 37:09.000]  case because you can't pay the attorney.
[37:09.000 --> 37:15.000]  This is how our justice system has set up the people to fail in their defense
[37:15.000 --> 37:17.000]  against it.
[37:17.000 --> 37:19.000]  Yeah.
[37:19.000 --> 37:22.000]  Okay.
[37:22.000 --> 37:28.000]  So my, uh, hold on just a second.
[37:28.000 --> 37:36.000]  Again, unless this case is resolved in your favor, you're not going to get to
[37:36.000 --> 37:39.000]  sue for anything.
[37:39.000 --> 37:41.000]  Yes, I actually do understand that.
[37:41.000 --> 37:49.000]  Now, my attorney has asked me to waive, uh, to waive my being here physically
[37:49.000 --> 37:54.000]  so that I may return to California, and, uh, what exactly?
[37:54.000 --> 37:58.000]  That means the attorney's going to go to court on your behalf, which means you
[37:58.000 --> 38:02.000]  better trust this guy like you trust your own mother.
[38:02.000 --> 38:03.000]  Okay.
[38:03.000 --> 38:05.000]  I understand that.
[38:05.000 --> 38:09.000]  Because once he goes in there on your behalf, he can make any deal he wants,
[38:09.000 --> 38:13.000]  no matter how far in the pit it throws you.
[38:13.000 --> 38:14.000]  Uh-huh.
[38:14.000 --> 38:15.000]  I understand that.
[38:15.000 --> 38:17.000]  Okay.
[38:17.000 --> 38:19.000]  Thank you.
[38:19.000 --> 38:24.000]  And, um... Now, the other thing you may not know yet or expect if they haven't
[38:24.000 --> 38:28.000]  told you, but if you're going to be leaving Florida with those kind of charges
[38:28.000 --> 38:32.000]  hanging over your head, you better bet there's going to be some sort of massive
[38:32.000 --> 38:40.000]  bail bond waiting to be had before you do so.
[38:40.000 --> 38:42.000]  I've already paid a bail bond to get out.
[38:42.000 --> 38:43.000]  No, no, no.
[38:43.000 --> 38:45.000]  You're not following what I'm telling you.
[38:45.000 --> 38:48.000]  You paid a bail bond to get out of jail.
[38:48.000 --> 38:52.000]  You're going to pay another one to leave the state.
[38:52.000 --> 38:57.000]  If you don't, I will be most surprised.
[38:57.000 --> 38:58.000]  Okay.
[38:58.000 --> 38:59.000]  Well, when would that take effect?
[38:59.000 --> 39:01.000]  I do not know that.
[39:01.000 --> 39:04.000]  I don't know California law like I know Texas law.
[39:04.000 --> 39:09.000]  But I do know that normally they're not going to let people charged with
[39:09.000 --> 39:15.000]  felonies just up and leave the state just because they don't actually live there.
[39:15.000 --> 39:18.000]  My attorneys told me that I'm free to go now.
[39:18.000 --> 39:19.000]  Okay.
[39:18.000 --> 39:22.000]  Well, if your attorney's telling you that, then that's great.
[39:22.000 --> 39:24.000]  Okay.
[39:24.000 --> 39:25.000]  Okay.
[39:25.000 --> 39:28.000]  So would you advise post-haste?
[39:28.000 --> 39:33.000]  I do what my attorneys have advised me, which is to return to my home.
[39:33.000 --> 39:37.000]  Well, again, I don't know whether post-haste is how you want to do it or not.
[39:37.000 --> 39:40.000]  Did they tell you to do it post-haste?
[39:40.000 --> 39:41.000]  No, they did not.
[39:41.000 --> 39:44.000]  Well, then I wouldn't worry about how fast I'd do it.
[39:44.000 --> 39:47.000]  I would just double-check and make sure that I can do it
[39:47.000 --> 39:54.000]  and not have a felony fugitive charge levied against me for doing it.
[39:54.000 --> 39:58.000]  Would that take effect at the airport or the train station?
[39:58.000 --> 40:02.000]  The moment you leave the state.
[40:02.000 --> 40:04.000]  Yes.
[40:04.000 --> 40:05.000]  Okay.
[40:05.000 --> 40:07.000]  So that means the moment you are wheels up at the airport,
[40:07.000 --> 40:11.000]  you would be a felony fugitive.
[40:11.000 --> 40:12.000]  Uh-huh.
[40:12.000 --> 40:16.000]  The moment your train rolls out of the station across a state line,
[40:16.000 --> 40:18.000]  you're a felony fugitive,
[40:18.000 --> 40:22.000]  unless the bond already allows you to leave the state.
[40:22.000 --> 40:26.000]  You need to double-check on that before you do it.
[40:26.000 --> 40:28.000]  Don't trust this attorney.
[40:28.000 --> 40:31.000]  Make damn sure that anything you're told,
[40:31.000 --> 40:34.000]  you get something in writing that backs it up.
[40:34.000 --> 40:36.000]  You get a copy of the bond.
[40:36.000 --> 40:38.000]  You get a copy of the release.
[40:38.000 --> 40:41.000]  You get a copy of the jail paperwork, the court orders.
[40:41.000 --> 40:46.000]  You get every piece of paper in hand before you go anywhere.
[40:46.000 --> 40:48.000]  Uh-huh.
[40:48.000 --> 40:50.000]  Okay.
[40:50.000 --> 40:51.000]  I had police training.
[40:51.000 --> 40:55.000]  I know that they didn't follow proper procedure.
[40:55.000 --> 41:00.000]  Well, again, do you know what the procedure in Florida is versus where you were trained?
[41:00.000 --> 41:02.000]  No, sir, I do not yet.
[41:02.000 --> 41:07.000]  Well, there you go, because local policies and procedures can vary, can't they?
[41:07.000 --> 41:08.000]  Yes, sir.
[41:08.000 --> 41:11.000]  I have police training, too, and they always have wherever I've been,
[41:11.000 --> 41:15.000]  because everybody has their own special way of doing things.
[41:15.000 --> 41:18.000]  Uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh.
[41:18.000 --> 41:22.000]  So unless you've actually read their policy and procedures manual,
[41:22.000 --> 41:26.000]  you can't say they didn't follow procedure as they understand it.
[41:26.000 --> 41:28.000]  Yes, I understand that. Thank you.
[41:28.000 --> 41:32.000]  Uh-huh.
[41:32.000 --> 41:35.000]  All right, anything else?
[41:35.000 --> 41:40.000]  Uh, misdemeanor charges.
[41:40.000 --> 41:47.000]  My wife has, they've also told her that she can leave on the bail that was posted to get out.
[41:47.000 --> 41:51.000]  Well, misdemeanor is not nearly as big a problem as felonies.
[41:51.000 --> 42:00.000]  So if they, again, you want all paperwork for both of you, do not leave Florida without it.
[42:00.000 --> 42:05.000]  You get stopped anywhere for any reason because somebody issues a bogus warrant against you,
[42:05.000 --> 42:10.000]  you better have the paperwork that shows that warrant's bogus.
[42:10.000 --> 42:13.000]  Okay.
[42:13.000 --> 42:24.000]  Can you please tell me the, okay, the bond, the release papers, and what else?
[42:24.000 --> 42:28.000]  It doesn't matter what else, get everything.
[42:28.000 --> 42:33.000]  If the attorney's written something down on a yellow sticky, get the sticky.
[42:33.000 --> 42:38.000]  Uh-huh, okay, and I can just say as my retained attorney,
[42:38.000 --> 42:41.000]  I would like to have everything, would you please provide me a copy?
[42:41.000 --> 42:43.000]  No, don't say I would like to have everything.
[42:43.000 --> 42:45.000]  Say, look, I'm paying you, right?
[42:45.000 --> 42:50.000]  Before I leave this state, I want a copy of every single piece of paperwork
[42:50.000 --> 42:56.000]  to make darn sure I'm protected from a false warrant as a fugitive once I do leave.
[42:56.000 --> 43:01.000]  I want everything and I need it in, oh, 24 hours.
[43:01.000 --> 43:03.000]  This guy works for you.
[43:03.000 --> 43:09.000]  He's supposed to kiss your butt, not the other way around.
[43:09.000 --> 43:13.000]  Okay.
[43:13.000 --> 43:15.000]  All right, anything else?
[43:15.000 --> 43:24.000]  Okay, and I have to read up and find out if I have rights to these documents or my...
[43:24.000 --> 43:29.000]  You, how would you not have a right to these documents?
[43:29.000 --> 43:32.000]  Uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh, well...
[43:32.000 --> 43:35.000]  Everything in that attorney's case file is yours.
[43:35.000 --> 43:37.000]  You're paying for it, it's yours.
[43:37.000 --> 43:39.000]  It's not his, it's yours.
[43:39.000 --> 43:44.000]  Every record they have in a public record file is yours, it's not theirs.
[43:44.000 --> 43:47.000]  All right, okay.
[43:47.000 --> 43:51.000]  Okay, so get on it, go for broke.
[43:51.000 --> 43:54.000]  All right, I got another break, Stephen, I'm going to take another caller.
[43:54.000 --> 43:55.000]  I hope I got your questions.
[43:55.000 --> 43:56.000]  Email me if I didn't.
[43:56.000 --> 43:57.000]  We'll be right back, folks.
[43:57.000 --> 44:00.000]  Y'all hang in there.
[44:00.000 --> 44:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.000 --> 44:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[44:07.000 --> 44:15.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:39.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.000 --> 44:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:03.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.000 --> 45:07.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com,
[45:07.000 --> 45:13.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street Sweet D here in Austin, Texas
[45:13.000 --> 45:19.000]  on Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:38.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:54.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.000 --> 46:30.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[46:30.000 --> 46:39.000]  Stephen, if you're still listening out there, my email address is eddieddie at ruleoflawradio.com.
[46:39.000 --> 46:46.000]  If you got any questions I didn't get a chance to address, email me there, and I'll see what we can do about getting you an answer.
[46:46.000 --> 46:53.000]  If you're going to ask me something specific to California law, don't, because I charge to do that kind of research.
[46:53.000 --> 47:00.000]  All right, so if you got a specific question about the laws in Florida, go to the attorney you're already paying.
[47:00.000 --> 47:03.000]  That would be your better bet.
[47:03.000 --> 47:10.000]  All right, that being said, we have Jody in Texas. Jody, what can I do for you?
[47:10.000 --> 47:17.000]  Oh, man. Thank you, dude. I've been fighting these people for nine and a half years.
[47:17.000 --> 47:19.000]  Which people would that be?
[47:19.000 --> 47:25.000]  It took me nine and a half years to get them back. Now I have 100 percent custody, and I got maxed out child support, 1,500 a month.
[47:25.000 --> 47:26.000]  Oh, well, cool.
[47:26.000 --> 47:31.000]  And these are evil. This is a scam. Our government was taken over in 1871. People don't even know it.
[47:31.000 --> 47:33.000]  I can't believe that this is even going on.
[47:33.000 --> 47:38.000]  But right now, the reason I'm calling, I'm just telling everybody about the custody fight.
[47:38.000 --> 47:48.000]  The way I won was education for my child. I put the child first, and I got a bachelor of science in education, and then a master's in psychology.
[47:48.000 --> 47:53.000]  Excuse me, I can barely talk. I'm almost crying. I've been alone in this so long.
[47:53.000 --> 47:57.000]  And a master of science in psychology specialization is students learning exceptional.
[47:57.000 --> 48:02.000]  My son now is way advanced before his grade level. I keep him in school just to see how the scam works.
[48:02.000 --> 48:07.000]  That's it. And you all hold in there. The government wants to destroy you and your family.
[48:07.000 --> 48:10.000]  But that's not why I'm calling in. I'm just so thankful for this.
[48:10.000 --> 48:14.000]  I wanted to give hope for you all out there fighting for your children. You're not alone.
[48:14.000 --> 48:21.000]  And I'm so excited. Right now, I'm just calling in about a traffic ticket.
[48:21.000 --> 48:28.000]  Well, congratulations on the custody fight. Glad you're able to do it and accomplish things the right way.
[48:28.000 --> 48:30.000]  It was horrible, man. It wasn't right.
[48:30.000 --> 48:39.000]  Well, it's always horrible because that is potentially, other than the Internal Revenue Tax Code and the tax courts at the federal level,
[48:39.000 --> 48:46.000]  there is no more corrupt area of the court system than family law. There just isn't.
[48:46.000 --> 48:51.000]  Pirates of the Caribbean. Incredible. I'm right now fighting this.
[48:51.000 --> 48:55.000]  And excuse me if I sound tired. I'm just so emotionally exhausted.
[48:55.000 --> 49:01.000]  I'm just now in a traffic ticket. And the problem is in my county here, Polk County, Texas, which is one hour,
[49:01.000 --> 49:10.000]  about 1.3 hours north of Houston, we're only about an hour from Houston County, which is where Andy Kelton was imprisoned.
[49:10.000 --> 49:14.000]  I didn't listen to every YouTube video I can get on you guys for the last seven days
[49:14.000 --> 49:17.000]  because I never knew you all existed until now.
[49:17.000 --> 49:23.000]  To the traffic ticket, I just decided to take them on. I knew it was a horrible scam.
[49:23.000 --> 49:25.000]  What's the charge on the ticket?
[49:25.000 --> 49:31.000]  I turned in my spurt. Just by providence did this. I think a way that you guys can help me out.
[49:31.000 --> 49:35.000]  I've got a bench trial in two weeks.
[49:35.000 --> 49:39.000]  Okay, wait a minute. What is the charge on the citation?
[49:39.000 --> 49:40.000]  Sir?
[49:40.000 --> 49:43.000]  What is the charge on the citation? What is the traffic offense?
[49:43.000 --> 49:46.000]  I was just straight up speeding in clear weather or light traffic.
[49:46.000 --> 49:47.000]  Okay.
[49:46.000 --> 49:48.000]  And I decided to fight.
[49:48.000 --> 49:53.000]  Okay. Well, first off, in your decision to fight, now this is my area of expertise.
[49:53.000 --> 49:58.000]  So I need to ask you some questions and get some answers from you before I let you continue, okay?
[49:58.000 --> 49:59.000]  You go right ahead.
[49:59.000 --> 50:03.000]  All right. When you were stopped, what did you do?
[50:03.000 --> 50:07.000]  I didn't know your script, which I now know.
[50:07.000 --> 50:10.000]  Okay. That's not important whether you knew the script or not.
[50:10.000 --> 50:12.000]  I gave him a license. I got the ticket and that was it.
[50:12.000 --> 50:15.000]  Okay. So you did produce everything he asked for?
[50:15.000 --> 50:16.000]  Correct.
[50:15.000 --> 50:16.000]  Okay.
[50:16.000 --> 50:18.000]  It was license and insurance.
[50:18.000 --> 50:22.000]  All right. Now go ahead with whatever else you got.
[50:22.000 --> 50:26.000]  I just wanted, I've got 16 days to get in there and handle this stuff.
[50:26.000 --> 50:33.000]  I already gave him a rundown of what I was going to do, which was pretend to defend this with the law.
[50:33.000 --> 50:40.000]  I used the 201.904 and I used maximum speed and I put promissory shawl in there.
[50:40.000 --> 50:44.000]  Did you file documents with these arguments in it?
[50:44.000 --> 50:47.000]  Yeah. I just replied saying I did, I request.
[50:47.000 --> 50:51.000]  Okay. Wait a minute. Wait, wait, wait, wait. Okay. Listen up now.
[50:51.000 --> 50:54.000]  Calm down a little bit and just listen to what I'm asking you.
[50:54.000 --> 50:55.000]  Yes, sir.
[50:55.000 --> 50:57.000]  Did you file legal pleadings?
[50:57.000 --> 50:59.000]  No. No, sir. No, sir.
[50:59.000 --> 51:02.000]  Then what did you send them?
[51:02.000 --> 51:12.000]  The secretary or the office asked me just to send a letter in saying that I'm not guilty and I want a trial and so I just sent it over.
[51:12.000 --> 51:13.000]  Okay.
[51:13.000 --> 51:15.000]  That's it.
[51:15.000 --> 51:20.000]  Okay. Congratulations. You've committed suicide.
[51:20.000 --> 51:22.000]  Yeah, I figured.
[51:22.000 --> 51:29.000]  Okay. The problem with entering a plea is it removes several rights from your availability.
[51:29.000 --> 51:33.000]  It removes your ability to challenge impersonal jurisdiction.
[51:33.000 --> 51:38.000]  It waives your right to challenge the form and substance of the complaint and the charging instrument.
[51:38.000 --> 51:42.000]  And it waives your right to notice of the allegations against you.
[51:42.000 --> 51:51.000]  In other words, it is the one of the three most important rights you have, you just killed a dead by entering that plea.
[51:51.000 --> 51:55.000]  That is why we don't ever do that.
[51:55.000 --> 52:03.000]  I'm not trying to make you feel bad. I'm just instructing you that this is why we don't do it and this is what you're doing by doing it.
[52:03.000 --> 52:07.000]  Okay. Because if you don't understand this, you're going to keep doing it.
[52:07.000 --> 52:08.000]  Yeah.
[52:08.000 --> 52:15.000]  All right. So don't ever enter a plea. No matter what they tell you, don't enter a plea.
[52:15.000 --> 52:26.000]  Do not refuse to enter. You simply ask the judge, is the court willing to demand an unconscionable plea of the accused?
[52:26.000 --> 52:30.000]  And he's going to go, well, what do you mean by an unconscionable plea?
[52:30.000 --> 52:37.000]  Well, judge, it is my understanding that the entering of a plea waives fundamental rights that I am not prepared to waive.
[52:37.000 --> 52:48.000]  Nor do I consent in any manner for this court to waive them on my behalf and deprive me of those rights when the court is required to protect them.
[52:48.000 --> 52:57.000]  And those are the three rights you're waiving and that's the three rights they would be waiving trying to enter one on your behalf because they have not complied with the Code of Criminal Procedure at all.
[52:57.000 --> 53:00.000]  Has anyone served you with a criminal complaint?
[53:00.000 --> 53:01.000]  No.
[53:01.000 --> 53:06.000]  Then what are you pleading to?
[53:06.000 --> 53:09.000]  I guess just intimidation.
[53:09.000 --> 53:14.000]  Pretty much because there is no complaint. There is no charge. There is no complaint.
[53:14.000 --> 53:22.000]  There is no jurisdiction in the court to demand you do anything, much less enter a plea.
[53:22.000 --> 53:23.000]  Okay.
[53:23.000 --> 53:31.000]  So what they trick you into doing is to entering a plea to the citation, which is completely denying your right of due process.
[53:31.000 --> 53:36.000]  But if you're doing that voluntarily, it's no skin off their nose.
[53:36.000 --> 53:42.000]  They just don't have to tell you that you're doing it voluntarily.
[53:42.000 --> 53:47.000]  See, everything about this system is just like the rest of it.
[53:47.000 --> 53:53.000]  It's built to corruptly deprive you of rights by not telling you anything.
[53:53.000 --> 54:03.000]  See, the court, just like the officer, was required to conduct a 15.17 proceeding and read you your rights,
[54:03.000 --> 54:12.000]  which you could only do once a valid complaint existed or you made your initial appearance on the citation.
[54:12.000 --> 54:13.000]  Okay?
[54:13.000 --> 54:15.000]  All right. I understand.
[54:15.000 --> 54:16.000]  They didn't do that.
[54:16.000 --> 54:20.000]  What do I do? Do I just got to pay them? How do I get out of this now?
[54:20.000 --> 54:28.000]  No, you can still fight it, but now your fight becomes a whole lot harder because now you have to fight on merits.
[54:28.000 --> 54:32.000]  You have to actually use the statutes to prove you're right and they're wrong.
[54:32.000 --> 54:47.000]  Fortunately, in a speeding case, it's entirely possible to do exactly that using the very statutes they're using because they aren't using it correctly.
[54:47.000 --> 54:54.000]  Okay? 201.904 is one piece of several.
[54:54.000 --> 55:02.000]  The other is 545.351 itself, wherein the only way to commit an act of speeding is to do so in such a manner
[55:02.000 --> 55:09.000]  that you fail to exercise due care that would allow you to maintain control of your vehicle
[55:09.000 --> 55:17.000]  and not avoid having a collision with another person or vehicle already lawfully upon or entering the highway.
[55:17.000 --> 55:19.000]  Were you in a collision?
[55:19.000 --> 55:21.000]  No, negative.
[55:21.000 --> 55:25.000]  Okay. So what are you going to make the officer testify to on the stand?
[55:25.000 --> 55:32.000]  Officer, can you please describe the make and model of the vehicle you're alleging that I hit or that I collided with?
[55:32.000 --> 55:33.000]  What?
[55:33.000 --> 55:35.000]  And he's going to go, there was no collision.
[55:35.000 --> 55:43.000]  Well, officer, can you please describe the biological sex of the person that you're alleging that I collided with?
[55:43.000 --> 55:46.000]  You didn't hit anybody.
[55:46.000 --> 55:48.000]  Well, then officer, I'm confused.
[55:48.000 --> 55:50.000]  How then can you make an allegation of speeding?
[55:50.000 --> 55:53.000]  Oh, well, you were going faster than the posted speed limit.
[55:53.000 --> 55:54.000]  Objection, officer.
[55:54.000 --> 55:56.000]  That's an incomplete answer.
[55:56.000 --> 56:07.000]  The statute requires my failure to exercise due care so as to fail to avoid a collision with another person or vehicle on the highway.
[56:07.000 --> 56:13.000]  You just testified those elements didn't exist and don't exist.
[56:13.000 --> 56:17.000]  How then could you charge me with speeding?
[56:17.000 --> 56:19.000]  Yes, absolutely understand.
[56:19.000 --> 56:20.000]  That's great.
[56:20.000 --> 56:32.000]  Okay, now on my blog site, cowoflaw.wordpress.com, and that's T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W.wordpress.com,
[56:32.000 --> 56:39.000]  there is an article up there that deals with the statutory elements of a speeding charge.
[56:39.000 --> 56:41.000]  You need to read that.
[56:41.000 --> 56:47.000]  Every element in there is something they must assert in the complaint and they won't.
[56:47.000 --> 56:53.000]  It will not be in the complaint if they ever generate one, and you need to demand that they do so.
[56:53.000 --> 57:05.000]  And if they try to prosecute you using just the citation, you have to object because the statute they're attempting to use is 27.14D of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
[57:05.000 --> 57:13.000]  which only authorizes them to use that citation if and only if you and the prosecutor have mutually agreed
[57:13.000 --> 57:24.000]  and signed a written waiver and filed it with the court saying you waived the requirement of a signed and sworn complaint, which you haven't done.
[57:24.000 --> 57:31.000]  So they cannot use the citation alone unless you do that.
[57:31.000 --> 57:32.000]  So don't do that.
[57:32.000 --> 57:36.000]  Don't sign anything they put in front of you, ever.
[57:36.000 --> 57:37.000]  Okay.
[57:37.000 --> 57:39.000]  Let me say this real quick.
[57:39.000 --> 57:45.000]  This is in two weeks, the court date. Can I reschedule this for later so that I can get educated before I go to the end?
[57:45.000 --> 57:50.000]  Well, you can try. Whether or not you can or not, I don't know.
[57:50.000 --> 57:56.000]  The problem is the only way that you can get that type of extension is to file a motion for continuance,
[57:56.000 --> 58:00.000]  and you have to state a legal basis for requesting the continuance.
[58:00.000 --> 58:07.000]  That continuance must be signed under oath and penalty of perjury to be valid.
[58:07.000 --> 58:12.000]  Texas requires all motions for continuance to be verified.
[58:12.000 --> 58:13.000]  Okay?
[58:13.000 --> 58:16.000]  So you won't get a continuance unless you do that.
[58:16.000 --> 58:23.000]  Now what you can do to avoid that is go talk directly to the prosecutor three or four days before trial
[58:23.000 --> 58:30.000]  and tell them you're requesting a reset because of some other issue.
[58:30.000 --> 58:31.000]  Okay.
[58:31.000 --> 58:35.000]  And they can set it for a different date without you having to file for a continuance.
[58:35.000 --> 58:42.000]  You don't want to file a continuance if you can avoid it because that stops the...
[58:42.000 --> 58:45.000]  Well, I'll get that in a second. Hang on. We'll cover this when I get back.
[58:45.000 --> 58:50.000]  All right, folks. Rule of Law Radio, 512-646-1980.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:54.000 --> 58:58.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:02.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:02.000 --> 59:07.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the Recovery Version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.000 --> 59:28.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free Recovery Version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:43.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Low Star Lowdown,
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  providing your deli bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:28.000]  Markets for Friday, the 3rd of June, 2016, are currently trading with gold at $1,243.80 an ounce,
[01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:34.000]  silver $16.39 an ounce, Texas crude $49.17 a barrel,
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  and Bitcoin is currently steadily rising at $573 U.S. currency.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:51.000]  Today in history, the year 1784, the U.S. Army is officially established by the Congress of the Confederation,
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:56.000]  created to replace the disbanded Continental Army after the Revolutionary War.
[01:00:56.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  The U.S. Army was founded today in history.
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  Recent news.
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:08.000]  The Brussels River, which runs 840 miles across much of the Lone Star State,
[01:01:08.000 --> 01:01:11.000]  has already risen to record levels, flooding neighborhoods west of Houston
[01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  and forcing hundreds of people to evacuate,
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:16.000]  with worse news coming from the National Weather Service,
[01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  predicting another four to five inches through the area in the weekend.
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:21.000]  Just as last April, if you recall,
[01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  more than 1,000 people were evacuated from northern Houston during another historic flood.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:31.000]  In Austin over the weekend, more than 2,000 inmates were evacuated from prisons in low-lying regions.
[01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:35.000]  Remember that just two years ago, the Brussels River had run dry in some places due to drought,
[01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:37.000]  but is now in an obviously saturated state.
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  A flash flood watch is currently in effect for all of south-central Texas,
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  according to the National Weather Service,
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:46.000]  and a river flood warning is in effect for the Brussels River.
[01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:54.000]  At least half a dozen fatalities have been a consequence of this flood.
[01:01:54.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  In what could be some of the most eyebrow-raising endorsements for presidential hopefuls in the United States,
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:03.000]  the President of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, came out and endorsed Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders on Tuesday,
[01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  calling him our revolutionary friend,
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:10.000]  and implying that it is our broken political system as to the reason why Sanders is being marginalized.
[01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  If that wasn't enough, North Korean state media, DPRK Today, published a column, also released on Tuesday,
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:19.000]  which came out and endorsed Republican newcomer Donald Trump,
[01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  calling him a wise politician,
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:25.000]  and stating that it turns out that Trump is not a rough-talking, screwy, ignorant candidate they say he is,
[01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:29.000]  but is actually a wise politician and pristine presidential candidate.
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:33.000]  As of yet, no authoritarian dictator has come out and endorsed Hillary Clinton,
[01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:37.000]  though some suspect this is due to many of them wanting to retain some level of credibility.
[01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  In what could only be considered ominous omens,
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  it seems that many of black cats are crossing the American people's path to this upcoming presidential election.
[01:03:09.000 --> 01:03:31.000]  All right, folks, we are back, and we are still speaking with Jody in Texas.
[01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:36.000]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984, and we still got an hour to go.
[01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:44.000]  All right, Jody, to continue on, what happens is if you file a continuance, it tolls the Speedy Trial Clock.
[01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:47.000]  It counts against you and not them.
[01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  That's why we avoid asking for a continuance from the defense side whenever possible.
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:57.000]  We always try to talk directly to the prosecutor and get a reset instead.
[01:03:57.000 --> 01:04:04.000]  That doesn't toll the clock, and it doesn't require a document to be filed.
[01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:10.000]  All right, if they won't give you a reset, then have a motion for continuance ready to be filed.
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:13.000]  But remember, it's got to state a valid legal reason.
[01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  I'll be out of town.
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  I had a death in the family.
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  I've got a surgery.
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:21.000]  I've got a sick child, blah, blah, blah.
[01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  It's got to be some reason that would be sufficient to them to give you the continuance.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  It's not a guarantee they will give it to you,
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:35.000]  but at least you're giving them documentation that you requested it regardless.
[01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  Mm-hmm.
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  Okay?
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  Okay.
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:39.000]  All right.
[01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:43.000]  Well, I guess right now, and this one was just simply speeding clear,
[01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:46.000]  does it even matter what's on the citation at all?
[01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:47.000]  Absolutely not.
[01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:48.000]  Are they just going to lie?
[01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  It only matters in the sense that nothing that is required to actually constitute the offense happened.
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:57.000]  Therefore, it's not on the citation.
[01:04:57.000 --> 01:04:59.000]  It's not on the complaint.
[01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  It's not even being alleged by anybody.
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  Thus, they are violating the law themselves by trying to convict you of something
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  without all of the necessary elements being given to you and your notice given of it.
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:15.000]  You see what I'm saying?
[01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:18.000]  We've been on a tile of law, wordpress.com.
[01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  That's the article you told me about that.
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:23.000]  Yeah, the statutory breakdown of a speeding allegation in Texas.
[01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:24.000]  Okay.
[01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:25.000]  Okay.
[01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  All right.
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  So I was just, I'm asked this is obviously wrong,
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:36.000]  but because of the 201-904 and the officer were saying that that's how he got his data,
[01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:43.000]  that I was violating the velocity, shouldn't he get indicted for lying or something?
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  No, because the Supreme Court said officers can lie in the performance of their duties.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  Your job is to know when they're lying in the performance of their duties and hold them accountable for it.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  Yeah.
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  All right.
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:05:57.000]  All right.
[01:05:57.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  I'm going to talk to Scott, and I'm going to read this article first,
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  and I will thank you guys, and I will leave you alone.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:03.000]  You keep it up, okay?
[01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:04.000]  Don't get tired.
[01:06:04.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  Don't get frustrated.
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  You're helping thousands of people, man.
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:08.000]  Well, it hadn't happened in 20 years,
[01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  so I don't expect it to happen anytime soon short of a bullet.
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  Yeah, that's where I'm at, sir.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  And I just want to think about the single fathers.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  You just educate your children.
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:21.000]  Don't try to tell them what to think or don't act bad to your mother.
[01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:23.000]  Just educate them in general about everything.
[01:06:23.000 --> 01:06:24.000]  They'll figure it out on their own.
[01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:27.000]  Don't be the bad person, and you will win.
[01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:30.000]  The courts cannot defeat that.
[01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  Thanks, guys.
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:32.000]  You all keep it up, okay, man?
[01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  All right, Jody, you too.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:35.000]  Congratulations.
[01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:36.000]  All right.
[01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  Now we're going to go to, as it looks like, Stephen is back.
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:44.000]  Stephen, what are you back for?
[01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  Hello?
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:47.000]  I guess Stephen isn't back.
[01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:49.000]  Just still up on the board.
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:50.000]  All right.
[01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:53.000]  Nick in Colorado, what can we do for you?
[01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  Hey, what's going on, guy?
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:55.000]  Can you hear me?
[01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  I can hear you.
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:06:59.000]  You're a little staticky, but what you got?
[01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  All right, man.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:04.000]  Basically, I was actually from Texas, and I'm traveling,
[01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:07.000]  just touring around the world and seeing what's going on.
[01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  But during my time in Texas, I've been studying your scripts,
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:13.000]  studying from other people as well,
[01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  and trying to get a better firm understanding of how can I get the judge,
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  basically, how do I get the judge to do what I tell him to,
[01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  how to force him to listen?
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:29.000]  Because what I've seen from videos is that you can obtain all the evidence
[01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:33.000]  from an illegal stop if you are in your right to travel.
[01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:37.000]  You can obtain all the legal evidence if you are brought to your hearing
[01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  about the violations of your right.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  But if the judge refuses to listen, it basically has to go toward a trial.
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:49.000]  Yeah, and the thing you need to understand,
[01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:51.000]  which obviously at the moment you haven't picked up on yet,
[01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:54.000]  is the game is rigged to force that, okay?
[01:07:54.000 --> 01:07:57.000]  The game is intentionally rigged to force you to trial
[01:07:57.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  regardless of what you can prove or force them to disprove.
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  And the only way to not go beyond that is to get acquitted by the jury
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  or by the judge, is to get found not guilty.
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  Otherwise, you're going to have to appeal it.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:16.000]  But you have to remember that this system was set up intentionally
[01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:19.000]  to deny your right of due process.
[01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  They're basically doing the same thing the casinos in Vegas
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:24.000]  and Atlantic City do.
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:28.000]  They are playing the odds, the odds that either A,
[01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:33.000]  you don't know how to appeal and will fail to perfect it in a timely manner
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  in accordance with their procedures,
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  two, you will get exasperated and give up and not attempt an appeal at all,
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:45.000]  or three, you will get an attorney that will screw you over
[01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:49.000]  and throw you under the bus and not help you while also taking your money,
[01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  which is part of what the system wants to do,
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:53.000]  is enrich itself at your expense,
[01:08:53.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  or four, some combination of all of the above, okay?
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:01.000]  The thing is that I've already learned from you and others
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:03.000]  that you don't get a bar association.
[01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  They're just going to work a deal.
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  What I'm trying to do is, I think you just mentioned it, to file for an appeal.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  I think that's where my studies haven't worked.
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  Right, and the only way you get an appeal is to go through the trial and lose.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  Okay.
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  I'm listening.
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:23.000]  That's it.
[01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:26.000]  You have to go through the trial and lose.
[01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  Then you move for an appeal because in most states in these types of cases,
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:36.000]  the state cannot file a motion for new trial if they lose
[01:09:36.000 --> 01:09:40.000]  because that would be double jeopardy, okay?
[01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:45.000]  So if you have to lose before an appeal becomes an issue,
[01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:51.000]  but you will lose 99.9% of the time in these courts, you will lose,
[01:09:51.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  especially if it's a bench trial, okay?
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  And the reason for that is is because they will block your every effort
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  to present the correct information to the jury to prove that their charges are bogus
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  or the jury will be picked that is the dumbest in the county or the municipality
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:14.000]  so that they will never understand why the charges are bogus
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  and find you guilty anyway.
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  You have to remember that going to trial in these cases these days is for one purpose
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  and one purpose only.
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  Even though you have the right to due process at every stage of every proceeding,
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  you're not going to get it the way the system is set up.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:33.000]  The lower courts are designed to deprive you of it at every turn.
[01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  So you have to make a good record that shows each and every one of those deprivations.
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  You have to get all of your arguments that would prove the charges false or insufficient
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  or whatever through your objections, your testimony, your evidence, your cross-examination,
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  and your transcript on the appeal and the pleadings that you filed
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  and all that goes to the appellate court for review.
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:04.000]  And you have to preserve those issues for them to review those issues
[01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:07.000]  and that's the way you do it depending upon whether it's a court of record
[01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  or a court of no record, how you do it varies.
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  But that's really what it is.
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  Go ahead.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:19.000]  So you are saying that I have to go through the hearing and then the trial
[01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:22.000]  and then to take it to the appellate court for the appeal?
[01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:25.000]  In almost every case that will be true.
[01:11:25.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  It will be the rare thing when they dismiss without a trial.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:31.000]  But here that's not all that rare.
[01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  I've gotten lots of them.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:36.000]  But the fact is is I'm using their own procedures against them.
[01:11:36.000 --> 01:11:39.000]  I know them better than they do.
[01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  And when they don't follow their procedures
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  or I catch them red-handed doing something that's outright illegal
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  by avoiding those procedures, they don't really have a choice.
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  They go to court now.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  They're totally hosed, not just in losing the case that they're charging you with,
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:12:03.000]  but also putting onto the record that they committed crimes themselves to get you there.
[01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:08.000]  So learning the process that they're required to follow has its advantages.
[01:12:08.000 --> 01:12:13.000]  Believe me, it does.
[01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:17.000]  Because I was trying to see if there's a way that you can just end that.
[01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:19.000]  Almost never will that happen.
[01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:24.000]  They don't get any money by ending it.
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:27.000]  Well, not to say they choose to, but yet the evidence that you know you're not.
[01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  No, no, no, you're misunderstanding.
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  Until you go to trial, there is no evidence of anything,
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  at least not in relation to the charge against you.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:37.000]  Okay, then.
[01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:38.000]  Okay?
[01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:44.000]  Now what you get on them doesn't have to go to trial.
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:49.000]  You can get everything short-circuited by what you get on them,
[01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:54.000]  because what you get on them will prove they've committed crimes
[01:12:54.000 --> 01:12:59.000]  in order to charge you falsely with a crime or to get you into their court.
[01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:01.000]  That becomes a whole different matter.
[01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:04.000]  But as far as the allegations against you,
[01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:13.000]  there is not yet any evidence in the record up until the point of an actual trial.
[01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:14.000]  Okay.
[01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  Now where can I further my education into the court procedures?
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:21.000]  Because I've been seeing certain things here.
[01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:28.000]  Well, every state has their procedures published in their codes and statutes.
[01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  For instance, here in Texas, it's the Code of Criminal Procedure for Criminal.
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:34.000]  It's the Code of Civil Procedure for Civil.
[01:13:34.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  And it's a combination of both of them when the Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:44.000]  doesn't cover an aspect of procedure that is required to provide due process
[01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  but is only found in the civil procedure,
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:48.000]  then you jump from the Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:51.000]  to the Code of Civil Procedure for that purpose.
[01:13:51.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  So it's a mixture of the criminal and civil procedure codes,
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:13:58.000]  and then it's a mixture of any specialized codes
[01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  that are directed at the particular type of court you may be in.
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:06.000]  It's studying whatever the local procedures of court might actually be,
[01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  because a lot of courts have their own procedures they use that have to conform to the law,
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:16.000]  but where the law says they can vary, they might.
[01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  Okay.
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:19.000]  And so on and so forth.
[01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:21.000]  So those are the kinds of things you've got to look at.
[01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:26.000]  And also you want to thoroughly investigate the actual penal statutes
[01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:31.000]  that deal with any particular allegation they've made.
[01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:32.000]  All right.
[01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:37.000]  And then last but not least, by a long shot, is to study any case law
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:44.000]  relevant to those types of cases and those particular statutes.
[01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:50.000]  Are you speaking in regards to, let's say, if they stop you for no plate?
[01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:51.000]  Yeah.
[01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  Then what you would want to look for is case law dealing with that section of statute
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:57.000]  that deals with license plates
[01:14:57.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  and any case opinions that decided that this person or that person can't be charged
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  and this person or that person can be charged.
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:08.000]  So you're saying use their own statutes against them
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:11.000]  as well as case laws that have already existed?
[01:15:11.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  Absolutely.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:14.000]  Okay, then.
[01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  Well, I already have an affidavit of fact written out, stamped,
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:22.000]  and it has Supreme Court ruling as well as other...
[01:15:22.000 --> 01:15:28.000]  Okay, which is going to do what for you?
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:32.000]  See, the problem most people have, and you ought to pardon the term,
[01:15:32.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  but this is why I use it.
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  The affidavit of truth is a patronet myth, and here's why.
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:45.000]  An affidavit does not stand alone, ever.
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  It is a sworn document, true,
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  but it is not evidence until it is presented in a court as evidence.
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  Yes.
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  Well, the only way to do that is for the person making the affidavit to take the stand
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:04.000]  and testify to all the facts in it.
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:07.000]  Guess what they're not going to allow you to do,
[01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  and guess why they're not going to allow you to do it.
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:14.000]  They're going to argue that, one, it is not relevant to the facts of the case
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:19.000]  as it is made against you, and they would be right.
[01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:21.000]  How so?
[01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:23.000]  The reason they would be right is, let me guess,
[01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:29.000]  your Supreme Court cases deal with the right to travel.
[01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:31.000]  Am I correct?
[01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:32.000]  Yes.
[01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:38.000]  Okay, hold that thought, and I will show you why that is not the argument
[01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  when we get back from this break, okay?
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  All right.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  Hang in there, and we'll be right back.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  We are now getting into our segment we in here.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  Hard to say.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  We've got three more segments to go,
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:17:15.000]  so y'all hang in there, and we'll be right back.
[01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:50.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:53.000]  The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser.
[01:17:53.000 --> 01:17:55.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:04.000]  Chances are you've heard of My Magic Mud, but have you used it?
[01:18:04.000 --> 01:18:07.000]  Thousands of people are blown away by the clean and healthy feeling
[01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  they experience after just one use.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:12.000]  Here's what Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books,
[01:18:12.000 --> 01:18:13.000]  has to say about the product.
[01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:16.000]  Hey, everybody, this is Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books.
[01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:18.000]  Just want to tell everybody about My Magic Mud.
[01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:21.000]  I use the product, and it makes my teeth feel clean and healthy.
[01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:23.000]  I think it makes them stronger.
[01:18:23.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  I've got lots of customers that come in and say the same thing.
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  You can pick yours up at Brave New Books.
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:30.000]  If that wasn't enough, Dr. Griffin Cole, DDS,
[01:18:30.000 --> 01:18:33.000]  who's been featured on The Alex Jones Show, loves it too.
[01:18:33.000 --> 01:18:35.000]  Hi, I'm Dr. Griffin Cole, and I've got to tell you,
[01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:37.000]  I really love this Magic Mud product.
[01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  Because charcoal is so absorbent, it's very effective at taking off
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  all the sticky plaque and debris that gets stuck on our teeth every day.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:45.000]  I highly recommend My Magic Mud.
[01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  If you haven't yet experienced My Magic Mud, it's never too late
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  to brighten your smile and strengthen your teeth.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:54.000]  Get your jar of My Magic Mud today at Brave New Books,
[01:18:54.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  located at 1904 Guadalupe Street, or order online today at MyMagicMud.com.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:29.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:31.000]  All right, folks, we are back,
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:34.000]  and we are speaking with Nick in Colorado right now.
[01:19:34.000 --> 01:19:39.000]  All right, Nick, now, do you remember the question I asked you?
[01:19:39.000 --> 01:19:43.000]  It was regarding the Supreme Court ruling traveling
[01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:45.000]  and how it wouldn't apply.
[01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:49.000]  Yeah, you're using case law that is discussing the right to travel.
[01:19:49.000 --> 01:19:53.000]  The question I need to ask you is this.
[01:19:53.000 --> 01:19:56.000]  What charge are they making against you
[01:19:56.000 --> 01:20:02.000]  that you violated a legal duty under the right to travel?
[01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  I would assume that they would say that it's a motor vehicle
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:08.000]  that's not registered to the state.
[01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:15.000]  How does a registered motor vehicle have anything to do with the right to travel?
[01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  I'm not even going to try to answer and just see,
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:21.000]  because I really don't understand.
[01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:28.000]  The point here is you're making a defense that is irrelevant to the allegation.
[01:20:28.000 --> 01:20:29.000]  Okay.
[01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:30.000]  Okay?
[01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:32.000]  That's like them saying we're charging you with murder
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:36.000]  and you saying I didn't rob that bank.
[01:20:36.000 --> 01:20:38.000]  Okay, then.
[01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:39.000]  Okay?
[01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:43.000]  No one charged you with robbing a bank, but that's what you're arguing.
[01:20:43.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  Well, that's what you're doing here.
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:50.000]  No one said you violated a legal duty associated with the right to travel.
[01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:54.000]  They're saying you violated a legal duty associated with engaging
[01:20:54.000 --> 01:20:59.000]  in commercial use of the highways.
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:04.000]  Now, do you see why one is not a defense to the other?
[01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  Well, if they're making statements that they're using it under the color of law
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:16.000]  saying that I am in violation of a statute or a state law,
[01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:19.000]  but yet I'm trying to prove that I am not.
[01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:21.000]  Why are you trying to prove anything?
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:24.000]  Who bears the burden of proof in a criminal allegation?
[01:21:24.000 --> 01:21:25.000]  The accuser, right?
[01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  It's them.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:27.000]  It's the accuser, yes.
[01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:31.000]  Then what are you trying to prove?
[01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  Why are you trying to prove it?
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  They have the burden of proof.
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:39.000]  Keep it where it belongs.
[01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  Okay.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:44.000]  They're the one making the allegation that you violated a legal duty
[01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:47.000]  associated with commercial use of the highways.
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:51.000]  Make them prove that.
[01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  You don't go, hey, I was flying an airplane.
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  What does that got to do with you being in the car when you got pulled over?
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  Worse yet, what if you were in the airplane on the highway?
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:06.000]  You see what I'm saying?
[01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:08.000]  Not the relevant argument.
[01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:14.000]  The relevant argument here is not engaged in commercial use of the highways.
[01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:21.000]  In the legal sense, you could only fight back from a legal forest fire
[01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  using an equal and opposite fire or a fire break.
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  But what you cannot do is use water.
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  Okay?
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  Because in this case, water does nothing to the fire.
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:45.000]  So in this, you have to assert not using the road for commercial transportation.
[01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  You have to prove I was using the road for commercial transportation.
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:51.000]  Where is your evidence?
[01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  And all they're going to do is go back to the statute and say,
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:55.000]  well, you're operating a motor vehicle.
[01:22:55.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  Objection.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:22:57.000]  Speculation.
[01:22:57.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  Opinion.
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  Requires a legal conclusion.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:01.000]  Assumes facts not in evidence.
[01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  Facts not previously agreed to.
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:06.000]  That's your opinion, counselor.
[01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  It's not a fact.
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  Where is your evidence that proves I was using the road for commercial purposes?
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:15.000]  Well, you're in a motor vehicle.
[01:23:15.000 --> 01:23:16.000]  Objection.
[01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  Again, presumption.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  Opinion.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  Speculation.
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:22.000]  Not a fact that's admitted into evidence.
[01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:23.000]  Blah, blah, blah.
[01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  You see what I'm saying?
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:29.000]  The assertions they're making, they cannot actually prove.
[01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:33.000]  There's only four things they could get to prove that you were engaged
[01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:35.000]  in commercial use of the highways, right?
[01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:39.000]  Do you know what they are?
[01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  A confession.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:42.000]  A confession.
[01:23:42.000 --> 01:23:46.000]  You have to admit, yes, I'm using the road to haul something for pay.
[01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:51.000]  A passenger manifest that shows that you had paying passengers with you at the
[01:23:51.000 --> 01:23:53.000]  time you were stopped.
[01:23:53.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  A bill of lading that shows you had property or goods that you were being paid
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:01.000]  to move from A to B on the highway.
[01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  Okay?
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:06.000]  Or a commercial logbook that shows you were keeping track of your time for the
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:09.000]  purpose of getting paid to drive whatever you were in.
[01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:13.000]  Yeah, I remember watching the video and took notes of that which you just
[01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  stated, too.
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:19.000]  Yeah, those are the only four actual pieces of evidence they could get to
[01:24:19.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  prove that you're engaged in transportation.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  Anything else is presumption and opinion.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:29.000]  But it all still falls back to the point where you still have to prove your
[01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:31.000]  innocence because they're going to make a claim.
[01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  No, you don't.
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  No, you don't.
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:38.000]  That's the entire reason you're making the case for the appellate court.
[01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  Because when it's all said and done, the first thing you're going to do at the
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:45.000]  end of the trial is stand up and say, Judge, I moved the court for a directed
[01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:47.000]  verdict in favor of the defense.
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  The state never proved the primary elements of its charge, that I was engaged
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:53.000]  in commercial use of the highways.
[01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  Without that element, none of the other elements matter.
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:24:58.000]  The allegation doesn't matter.
[01:24:58.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  All right, so that I'm clear, so that I'm clear.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  If I was to be stopped and cited and had to go to a hearing, I'd simply, you
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  know, object to this, I'd simply tell the judge that I was not in commerce,
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  I'm a traveler, and that I travel.
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:17.000]  No, travel, don't even say travel.
[01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  That has nothing to do with nothing.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  You're going to, and you don't say anything unless it's written down first.
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  Okay?
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:32.000]  And you most certainly don't say anything until you have protected your right of
[01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  special appearance to challenge their jurisdiction to have you in that court.
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:43.000]  Because unless they actually have evidence that you are subject to that code
[01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:49.000]  and those regulations, they lack personal jurisdiction, which is something they
[01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:53.000]  never tell you and they never attempt to prove they ever had.
[01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  But they must have it.
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:26:01.000]  They wind up getting it because most people don't understand that.
[01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:05.000]  And then they either open their mouth or they file paperwork that doesn't
[01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:10.000]  protect them.
[01:26:10.000 --> 01:26:16.000]  There are several things you're going to file in writing, and the only words
[01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  that will ever come out of your mouth is I reserve my special appearance to
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  challenge the proceedings of this court and its jurisdiction.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:27.000]  That's it.
[01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  Everything else will be taken directly from whatever you put in writing into
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:33.000]  that court.
[01:26:33.000 --> 01:26:38.000]  Anything you ask the witness on the stand is going to be directed at the same
[01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:43.000]  stuff that's in your writings that you filed in that court.
[01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  Officer, did you obtain a commercial log book from the accused?
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  No.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  Did you obtain a passenger manifest, a bill of lading or a confession?
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:55.000]  Were you ever told they were not engaged in commercial use of the highway or
[01:26:55.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  any form of transportation?
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:26:59.000]  Well, yeah, I was.
[01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  Officer, did you suspect that they were engaged in transportation?
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  Well, no, I never thought they were engaged.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  I never thought they were commercial.
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:09.000]  Ding, ding, ding.
[01:27:09.000 --> 01:27:13.000]  They have just admitted their primary element never existed.
[01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:17.000]  That makes the entire stop illegal.
[01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:21.000]  So one of the original filings that we would have filed would have been a
[01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  motion to suppress everything because they never established the primary
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  element they had to have, that you were subject to the statute in the code by
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:36.000]  being subject to the code itself.
[01:27:36.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  You see?
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  This is how you make them shoulder their burden of proof rather than you
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:48.000]  trying to assume it, and how you prove that they didn't prove their case
[01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:52.000]  without breaking a sweat, I might add.
[01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:56.000]  Okay.
[01:27:56.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  I just have to hit my notes again and make sure that I get everything.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:06.000]  Well, this archive should be up in three or four days or so, so you can
[01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  download this and review it again if you need to.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:15.000]  Is there anything else that you could recommend to me, like maybe a video
[01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  tutorial?
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  The only thing that will help you learn anything would be the
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  Jurisdictionary course, but it's mostly about civil lawsuits, though many of
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:28.000]  the procedures and the way you write pleadings and things of that nature
[01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:30.000]  would be quite similar.
[01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:32.000]  They're not exact.
[01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  Jurisdictionary does not deal with criminal cases.
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  It only deals with civil.
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  So it would teach you a lot of the process, but it wouldn't teach you the
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  law, and it most assuredly wouldn't teach you criminal procedure.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:50.000]  So technically speaking, yeah, there's tons of videos up on YouTube on how
[01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  to do cross-examination, direct examination, what a leading question is,
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  who can do leading questions and when, and these are things that you've got
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:03.000]  to watch the prosecuting attorney through the whole course of events
[01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:07.000]  and object to them doing, because they will sneak that in on you, and if you
[01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:09.000]  don't object, they get away with it.
[01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  They will testify when they're not allowed to testify, and you've got to
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:15.000]  object to it or they get away with it.
[01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  So there's lots of things up there about how to conduct those cross-examinations
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:23.000]  and direct examinations, leading questions and so on and so forth, how to
[01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  make objections.
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:28.000]  Those are things you need to be studying as well.
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  Okay.
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  What was your email address, Eddie?
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  What was it, what?
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:38.000]  Your email address, so I can maybe send you...
[01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com, and that's E-D-D-I-E.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  Okay.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  All right.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  All right, Nick, I've got to go, man, but good luck and email me if you've got
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  any more questions.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, 512-646-1984.
[01:29:58.000 --> 01:30:02.000]  Be right back.
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:04.000]  Please scan your next item.
[01:30:04.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  That annoying mechanical voice from the self-checkout lane may soon be
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:09.000]  silenced for good.
[01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll have great news on the death of
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  computerized cashiers next.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again, and once
[01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:29.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to
[01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:30.000]  yourself.
[01:30:30.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:36.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the
[01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:40.000]  private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:43.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:47.000]  Apparently, I'm not the only one who hates the self-serve check stands at
[01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:48.000]  stores.
[01:30:48.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  After a decade of trying them, retailers are finally acknowledging studies that
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  say shoppers would rather dodge the self-serve lane and head for a human
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:30:57.000]  cashier.
[01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:01.000]  Today, just 16 percent of grocery store transactions go through
[01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:02.000]  self-checkout lanes.
[01:31:02.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  That's down from a high of 22 percent three years ago.
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  Shoppers say they're more satisfied when they pay people, not cold computers.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  In response, grocery chains like Big Y and Albertsons plan to bag the
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:17.000]  do-it-yourself option and bring back customer service.
[01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:18.000]  Hooray.
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  Now, if only they dumped the purchase tracking cards, I mean, membership
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  cards.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:24.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:32.000]  I lost my son.
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:33.000]  I lost my nephew.
[01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:34.000]  My uncle.
[01:31:34.000 --> 01:31:35.000]  My son.
[01:31:35.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  September 11, 2001.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:47.000]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  believe there is more to the story.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:08.000]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body
[01:32:08.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  the nutrients it needs.
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  Did you know the U.S.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States and
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:18.000]  classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant?
[01:32:18.000 --> 01:32:22.000]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still
[01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:24.000]  don't know what hemp is.
[01:32:24.000 --> 01:32:28.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:31.000]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:35.000]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people
[01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  to know about.
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free,
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:49.000]  anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  do for you, only at hempUSA.org.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:08.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:33:08.000 --> 01:33:11.000]  At logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and now we have Truth Raider.
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  All right, Raider, I'm going to play a little game with you.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  You remember the TV show, The Amazing Kreskin?
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  No, sir.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:06.000]  Kreskin used to be a talk show host that could do magic and read minds, okay?
[01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  All right.
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  And the note I have is you want to ask about Title 18, Section 31,
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:16.000]  which if memory serves, you're going to go to sub-item 6 and ask about the
[01:34:16.000 --> 01:34:21.000]  definition of motor vehicle in the federal statutes, am I correct?
[01:34:21.000 --> 01:34:23.000]  For the use of being in a civil...
[01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:25.000]  No, answer my question.
[01:34:25.000 --> 01:34:29.000]  That's what you're going to ask me about, correct?
[01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  Right, what you thought...
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  Now, without you going through anything else, let me explain something before
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:38.000]  you begin, and let's see if I answer your question without you actually
[01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:41.000]  telling me what it is, okay?
[01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  All righty.
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:49.000]  Title 18 does not apply to the states in any way, shape, or form except
[01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  under federal regulation involving interstate commerce across state lines
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  and violation of the criminal statutes found in Title 18 while doing so.
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  Were you in any way charged with a federal crime involving transportation
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  of an illegal substance, a minor, or stolen goods or property?
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  No, not that I'm...
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:21.000]  Then it doesn't have a damn thing to do with you or anybody else in any
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:23.000]  other kind of case.
[01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:24.000]  Did I answer your question?
[01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  Yes, sir, that's the reason why I call it...
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  Ding, Chris getting one.
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  All right.
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:36.000]  All right, well, the reason why I ask that and the reason why we do call in
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:40.000]  is to make sure we're doing things right before we screw up.
[01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:41.000]  One would hope.
[01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  That's the reason why I want to ask...
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  Yeah, that's the reason why I call to ask you about that.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:48.000]  Before I do anything, I want to verify it with the expert.
[01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  Well, it doesn't take an expert to understand federal law only applies
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:54.000]  to federal charges.
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:56.000]  Okay, all right.
[01:35:56.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  The reason why I thought of it is because...
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  You've been reading the patronite crap on the Internet again.
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  That's why you thought of it.
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:07.000]  Just an idea.
[01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:10.000]  Well, okay, so it's in that category and it's in that classification.
[01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:13.000]  So there's no avoid and I won't use it.
[01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:17.000]  Okay, yeah, the problem here is you have all these people trying to go find all
[01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:22.000]  these obscure statutes and everything else and make them apply to everything as
[01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  if they ever did.
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  That's like taking the operator's manual for the Queen Mary and trying to
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  translate it into the operation of a dinghy.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  Okay.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:34.000]  Okay, it just wasn't designed for that.
[01:36:34.000 --> 01:36:38.000]  It wasn't intended for that, and it really doesn't apply to that.
[01:36:38.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  Same thing.
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:41.000]  Okay, okay.
[01:36:41.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  The thought process that's going on here among most of the patriot community or
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:49.000]  patronut community or just simple folks just like myself that are just trying to
[01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  seek the truth, tell the truth and help people out is because since it is
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:37:00.000]  federal, there is an element where that somehow has greater power and
[01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  supersedes the state and especially the statutory laws.
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:13.000]  Okay, only where the state law is in addition to a federal program under
[01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  federal law.
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  For instance, you can make the argument that the state transportation codes can
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:27.000]  be controlled by federal law if you can show that the state codes have a link
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:32.000]  to Title 49 of the United States Code.
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:34.000]  Then you could make that argument.
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  Okay, however, there's two sides to that coin, or in this particular case,
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  there's three.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  You've also got to stand this coin on edge.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  And here's why.
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  The state courts are going to say very clearly that the state has the power to
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  regulate non-commercial as well as commercial.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  We know that because that's what they're doing every single day.
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:02.000]  But what we have to be able to do is to prove that that is a misreading and
[01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:08.000]  misapplication of the actual law itself in the state, which I've done for Texas.
[01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  Okay, I can show you straight up it never applied to the public,
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:15.000]  never can apply to the public.
[01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:20.000]  And technically speaking, it can't anywhere else either, but they've got their
[01:38:20.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  statutes written where it's not easy to prove that.
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  The simple fact of the matter is that's where you've got to be able to say,
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  okay, here's our tie into 49.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:35.000]  You're making the argument that this isn't a transportation, a commercial use
[01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:39.000]  of the highways argument when in fact here's the actual legislative acts and
[01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  captions and titles and bill subjects that prove it actually is.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:47.000]  Now how do you respond to that?
[01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  Now you've got the coin standing on edge.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:55.000]  Okay?
[01:38:55.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  So that's what I'm talking about here.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:02.000]  Until you can tie the state project to the federal law, you can't say the
[01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:08.000]  federal law supersedes the state on any given subject.
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:12.000]  Period.
[01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  All right, Caprindo.
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:23.000]  All right, now my second question is, did you get my little greeting card?
[01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:28.000]  Well, I've gotten several, so I really can't answer that question, probably.
[01:39:28.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  When did you send it?
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  I sent it a few weeks ago.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  Then I probably have it.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  All right, because I got challenged on air.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:42.000]  I'm pretty sure if I did, as a matter of fact, the last one I got that I did
[01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  know for a fact was from you.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:47.000]  I sent an email about saying thanks.
[01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:49.000]  Okay.
[01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:50.000]  I'm going to check it.
[01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:53.000]  I haven't seen anything come up yet, so I don't know.
[01:39:53.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  So with that, here's a great idea that maybe you agree with, maybe you don't
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:02.000]  agree with, but I'll present it to you first to see what you're taking on it
[01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:06.000]  is and see if you think it's a good idea to do or not.
[01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  I was down at the DMV for the purposes of trying to start the process and ask.
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:17.000]  Start what process?
[01:40:17.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  Start the process of redacting my signature and redacting registration.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  Redacting?
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:28.000]  You know what that means, right?
[01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  You want them to black it out?
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  That's not going to happen.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:34.000]  You mean rescinding?
[01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  Yeah, I want to disconnect from the contract.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  Okay, you're going to rescind your signature.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  Right.
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  Okay.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:51.000]  If that's the correct term, then rescind.
[01:40:51.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  I've heard the terminology being used to redact your signature.
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  Well, no, redact means to blank out or remove from a document,
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:04.000]  but it's not removed as in invalidating the document.
[01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:08.000]  It's removed as in made where it cannot be read by others.
[01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  That's what redacted means.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  That's why when the government gives you privacy or FOIA requests,
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  then they send you redacted documents.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  They're not invalid documents.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:21.000]  They just have sections blacked out.
[01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:23.000]  That's what redacted is.
[01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  All right, all right, so I want to rescind all my previous, I guess,
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:34.000]  my voluntary compliance or any so-called,
[01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  I don't know what you would call it, quasi-contracting with the state,
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  so to speak, that I'm not engaged in their transportation system.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:52.000]  I want to be able to remove them as a, I don't know what you would call it,
[01:41:52.000 --> 01:42:00.000]  maybe a co-ownership of my pickup truck for the particular state,
[01:42:00.000 --> 01:42:06.000]  you know, remove their name from my title and go to the process if I can
[01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:11.000]  to be able to have my own private title of ownership of my pickup truck.
[01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:13.000]  Okay.
[01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:17.000]  First off, you have a complete misconception of what your ownership is or isn't.
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  Do you even know what a certificate of title is?
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  I'm not asking for your opinion.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:34.000]  I'm asking have you looked at the actual statutes to see what a certificate of title actually is?
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  Then what the hell do you think you're going to know about what to do with it?
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  How do you intend to do something with a document that you don't understand?
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:49.000]  Let me clarify why I'm asking this.
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  Here in Texas, the certificate of title is a negotiable instrument.
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:43:00.000]  It's a deed to the vehicle.
[01:43:00.000 --> 01:43:09.000]  It's negotiable because all you have to do to transfer possessory ownership of that vehicle is to sign that title,
[01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  just like you would a deed or a check, and hand it to someone else.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  And now it's theirs.
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  The difference there being legal ownership versus equity ownership.
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  A certificate of title can only invest the party in possession of that certificate with legal ownership.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  And I'll explain that when I get back, so hold on.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:40.000]  All right.
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  We are entering our last segment, and I've got one more caller after Raider,
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  so I'll get to that guy just as quick as I can, provided Raider lets me get there.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  In any case, y'all hang on, and we will be right back after this break.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:03.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:03.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Boring.
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:07.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  What?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:16.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[01:44:16.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:40.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries
[01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:50.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  The affordable, easy-to-understand, core CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:15.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:15.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:35.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and I am speaking with Truth Radar.
[01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  All right, Radar, the difference here, the legal ownership that is transferred by a certificate of title
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  is the problem with a certificate of title.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  Legal ownership by definition is all the rights of possession of a piece of property,
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:57.000]  but none of the rights of disposition or disposal of said property,
[01:46:57.000 --> 01:47:05.000]  which means though you may legally have possession of it, you do not have ownership of it
[01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  that would allow you to sell it, trade it, or destroy it,
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:19.000]  or to transfer it to someone else by any means other than that certificate of title, okay?
[01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:26.000]  That's the difference between an equity owner and a legal owner, okay?
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:32.000]  So what the certificate of title is is exactly the same thing for a car
[01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:36.000]  that a mortgage note is for a house, okay?
[01:47:36.000 --> 01:47:39.000]  It's exactly the same thing.
[01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:43.000]  What was supposed to happen with the certificate of title was it was issued
[01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:48.000]  as long as the vehicle was purchased through a loan,
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  and that was done so that the state would have the necessary information
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:47:56.000]  to make sure that the two parties honored the contract
[01:47:56.000 --> 01:48:02.000]  and that the lien holder and the borrower's rights were protected.
[01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  Once the lien was paid off,
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  the certificate of title was supposed to be traded back in for the actual deed to the vehicle,
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  which would be the MCO or MSO, but they don't do it that way.
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  Instead, they microfiche the MCO and MSO and then shred and burn the original.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:32.000]  In other words, they are making it where it is now legally impossible
[01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:38.000]  to ever have the original ownership papers for a car, okay?
[01:48:38.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  It's fraud through and through.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:47.000]  But you're going to the DMV to do something the DMV doesn't actually have any control over
[01:48:47.000 --> 01:48:53.000]  because that's the way the operation of the state law requires it to be done,
[01:48:53.000 --> 01:49:01.000]  even though that law violates proper business practices under contracts.
[01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:03.000]  Excellent. Okay.
[01:49:03.000 --> 01:49:09.000]  Well, this is an ongoing educational experience, how to do things correctly.
[01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  So this is for the benefit of everybody to hear this.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  Yeah, when you look up the certificate of title here in Texas statutes in the business code,
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  the business of commerce code, that's exactly what it will tell you the certificate of title is.
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:26.000]  It's a negotiable instrument.
[01:49:26.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  It in no way whatsoever is an ownership instrument
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:36.000]  other than for the purpose of possession, rightful possession.
[01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:38.000]  Very good. Very good. All right.
[01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:42.000]  That's something new I learned today that I didn't know yesterday.
[01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:43.000]  Okay.
[01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  We're always learning things new each and every day, folks.
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:49.000]  Okay. One more minute, and I'll let you get on to other callers
[01:49:49.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  because in the interest of time, this time is running out right here.
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:55.000]  Yeah.
[01:49:55.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  There was a couple of people, I don't know if you like this idea or not,
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:01.000]  but there was a couple of people out there in front of the DMV taking petitions
[01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:05.000]  or actually having petitions signed considering the driver's license
[01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  being attached to your voting record.
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:14.000]  Now, I signed their petition to that for the purpose of people trying to get
[01:50:14.000 --> 01:50:19.000]  the signatures together here so that way they can get that particular motion
[01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:21.000]  that they're trying to do to get everybody who has a driver's license
[01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:25.000]  to be automatically registered as a voter.
[01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:28.000]  And the purpose of it was what the people thought about it.
[01:50:28.000 --> 01:50:29.000]  Did they agree with that?
[01:50:29.000 --> 01:50:35.000]  Did they like that or did they not like that type of intrusion in their life
[01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:39.000]  concerning voting, whatever, whatever they were doing.
[01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:43.000]  But then I presented the idea of how about this?
[01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:47.000]  How about a petition being put together where people who have a perfect record,
[01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:51.000]  haven't done anything, haven't engaged in any type of criminal activity,
[01:50:51.000 --> 01:50:53.000]  have a perfect traveling record, let's call it that,
[01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:57.000]  a perfect traveling record or a driving record, one or the other.
[01:50:57.000 --> 01:50:59.000]  How about this?
[01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  Put something on the bill where a person who has a perfect record,
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:06.000]  hasn't broken any laws and has been very duly responsible on the highway
[01:51:06.000 --> 01:51:09.000]  to be able to exercise their right of travel
[01:51:09.000 --> 01:51:16.000]  versus having to be forced to contract as a driver to be driving privileged
[01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  and they liked the idea and they said, okay, let me give you some information on it.
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:21.000]  That sounds really good.
[01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:25.000]  So what I'm going to do here in the state of Oregon is see if they can go around
[01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:29.000]  and have a bunch reformulated, get it done correctly, go around to the DMVs
[01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  and have a petition that people sign this petition where they think about
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:36.000]  the right to be able to exercise their right to travel
[01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:40.000]  versus having to be forced to contract as a driver as a privilege.
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:46.000]  Well, the thing is the statutes in the state you're in already do that.
[01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  They're just not written to make it easy to show or to understand.
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:57.000]  Right. Well, this is to make people aware because 99% of the people
[01:51:57.000 --> 01:51:59.000]  don't know they have a right of travel.
[01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:05.000]  Yeah, but how do you petition to get information in the hands of the people is the problem.
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  What's the petition part of it going to do for you is my question.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  Well, it's just maybe a project or a test to get as many signatures as possible
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  gathered together to see what the opinion or what the public thinks about that.
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:27.000]  Should they be, you know, the first thing is an educational thing to make people aware
[01:52:27.000 --> 01:52:30.000]  that they do have the right to travel.
[01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:32.000]  But the other part of it is just, you know...
[01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:37.000]  Well, I got a much easier solution.
[01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:43.000]  Print up some cards with the radio station information on it and have them listen in.
[01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:50.000]  Send them to my blog, have them read, have them go to YouTube, have them watch.
[01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:53.000]  That'd be a whole lot easier to get in something like a petition together
[01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  even though a petition is to get someone to do something.
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:52:59.000]  I don't know why you'd need a petition for this.
[01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  People are only going to become as educated as they choose.
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:09.000]  All right. Well, it's a way to reach out to people and bring it to their attention.
[01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  Yeah, well, so is a slingshot and a rock.
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:18.000]  All right. Just want to get your take on your idea and your thoughts about that.
[01:53:18.000 --> 01:53:20.000]  And I was going to do that too as well.
[01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:23.000]  You're going to shoot somebody with a slingshot and a rock?
[01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:28.000]  No, no, no. I was going to do that, also promote your show.
[01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:30.000]  So I'll give you a plug along the way.
[01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  All right. Well, information is only as good as the person willing to hear it.
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:42.000]  Okay. Well, so this is kind of like a test to see what happens concerning that.
[01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  All right. Well, good luck.
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:46.000]  Anyhow, let me get to this other caller.
[01:53:46.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  Okay. Thanks for calling in, Raider.
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:50.000]  I'll see you in three weeks.
[01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:51.000]  Okay.
[01:53:51.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  I'm coming down to Texas in three weeks. I'll see you on the 26th.
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:55.000]  All right. Don't trip on the way.
[01:53:55.000 --> 01:53:58.000]  All right. Bye.
[01:53:58.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  Thanks, Eddie.
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Charles in Texas.
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:05.000]  Charles, I got about five minutes so I can give you three of them.
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:09.000]  What do you got?
[01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  Hello, Charles.
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:15.000]  Charles may have expired.
[01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  Waiting on Raider to let me get to the next caller or he dropped.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:23.000]  Either way, I'm not getting an answer here.
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:29.000]  Charles, one last time, are you there?
[01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:33.000]  All right. Not a lot I can do about that if they're not.
[01:54:33.000 --> 01:54:36.000]  In the meantime, let me check one of the things here.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:41.000]  Stephen, are you still holding for some reason?
[01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  Also not a number that's connected.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:45.000]  Okay. All right, folks.
[01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  In the last few minutes I got left here,
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:51.000]  I want to thank everybody that's called in and had comments and questions tonight.
[01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:57.000]  And hopefully I haven't been too abrasive or put off-ish in the way that I do things here.
[01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:00.000]  But the fact is is that I'm very passionate about this subject.
[01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:03.000]  I'm very passionate about what I do and why I do it.
[01:55:03.000 --> 01:55:07.000]  I'm tired of people trying to run my life and everyone else's.
[01:55:07.000 --> 01:55:10.000]  Whether you appreciate the way I present the information or not,
[01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:13.000]  you need to understand one thing about why I'm here.
[01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:15.000]  I'm here fighting for you.
[01:55:15.000 --> 01:55:20.000]  Even if you don't think there's something to fight for, I do because I've seen it.
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  I've experienced it.
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:24.000]  And I know it for the evil that it is.
[01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:28.000]  You may not realize the danger you're in, but I do.
[01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:32.000]  And so this fight, whether you want to take it on personally or not,
[01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:34.000]  needs to be fought by someone.
[01:55:34.000 --> 01:55:37.000]  I've chosen to do that.
[01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:41.000]  Whether it be just for me or everybody, I try to do it for everybody.
[01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:44.000]  That's the reason I got asked on this show.
[01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  It's the reason I stay on this show.
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:51.000]  This is a venue where I can bring this information to you and provide you with
[01:55:51.000 --> 01:55:55.000]  something you're not being told that is vitally important to your rights
[01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:58.000]  and your very way of life.
[01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:03.000]  You may think that getting behind the wheel of a car is a small thing,
[01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  and that the government's ability to tell you when and if and how you can do
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  that is a small thing.
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  But if you sit down and really consider how limited your life truly would and
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:24.000]  is, truly would be and is, if you have to ask permission for that,
[01:56:24.000 --> 01:56:30.000]  you might come to understand why I do this.
[01:56:30.000 --> 01:56:32.000]  You wouldn't be able to go visit your family.
[01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  You wouldn't be able to go get your groceries to pick your kids up from school,
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:41.000]  to take them to school, to take a vacation that involves getting in a car.
[01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:43.000]  You would have to pay for taxis.
[01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:45.000]  You would have to get someone to carry you.
[01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:51.000]  You would have to do all kinds of things rather than do for yourself if the
[01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:57.000]  government is allowed to take away your right to locomotion.
[01:56:57.000 --> 01:57:01.000]  They've managed to successfully do so for quite a few decades,
[01:57:01.000 --> 01:57:09.000]  but they've done it through lies, usurpations, and unconstitutional acts,
[01:57:09.000 --> 01:57:13.000]  both in law and in use of force.
[01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:15.000]  That needs to change.
[01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:21.000]  The Founding Fathers would spit on us for letting our nation get the way it has.
[01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:26.000]  Do you think any one of them would have thought it was acceptable for someone
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:30.000]  to come up and say you've got to stamp a number on your horse and pay me a fee
[01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:33.000]  before you can go down the road on him?
[01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:37.000]  You've got to register your horse with the redcoats before you can,
[01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:41.000]  once you buy it so they'll know that you have it and how many you have and what
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:46.000]  kind they are and what they can, whether they're work or pleasure or riding.
[01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  You think the Founding Fathers would have allowed that kind of stuff?
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:54.000]  You think anything really has changed that should allow that kind of stuff?
[01:57:54.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  Because I sure as hell don't.
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:57:59.000]  A right is always a right.
[01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:03.000]  I don't care what your public servants try to convince you of otherwise.
[01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:08.000]  You need to understand that or you don't have any.
[01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  I'm here to try to get you to understand that
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  and to fight the fight that nobody else can or will.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  So, folks, we need your support.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  We need you to call.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:19.000]  We need you to talk.
[01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  We need you to help us out and be there for us like we try to be there for you.
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:29.000]  So keep us in your prayers, keep us in your financial means whenever you can,
[01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  and y'all have a great week.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  Y'all have a good night and God bless.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  If you are a bully, a bully, I beg you, treat me good.
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:44.000]  I'm like a deaf in the face.
[01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:46.000]  I don't know what my size.
[01:58:46.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  I'm dangerous, dangerous.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:55.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible
[01:58:55.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:01.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes
[01:59:01.000 --> 01:59:04.000]  that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:26.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:36.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:36.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.000 --> 01:59:53.000]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:53.000 --> 02:00:07.000]  You found it, logosradionetwork.com.