[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:08.000 --> 00:10.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:10.000 --> 00:23.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.000 --> 00:29.000]  Markets for Wednesday, April 13, 2016 are currently treading with gold at $1,246.13
[00:29.000 --> 00:36.000]  an ounce, silver $16.29 an ounce, Texas crude $42.17 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:36.000 --> 00:45.000]  sitting at about $426 U.S. currency.
[00:45.000 --> 00:51.000]  Today in history, the year 1970, the Apollo 13 astronauts announced Houston we've got
[00:51.000 --> 00:56.000]  a problem as a result of a beach-built oxygen tank exploding en route to the Moon.
[00:56.000 --> 01:00.000]  The beginning of the Apollo 13 crisis was 46 years ago.
[01:00.000 --> 01:05.000]  Today in history.
[01:05.000 --> 01:09.000]  In recent news, more than 400 protesters were arrested last Monday outside of the U.S.
[01:09.000 --> 01:13.000]  Capitol from an organization called Democracy Spring, which is seeking to remove special
[01:13.000 --> 01:18.000]  interests from politics and raise awareness for change on restrictive voter identification
[01:18.000 --> 01:19.000]  laws.
[01:19.000 --> 01:23.000]  The demonstration resulted in arrests for what U.S. Capitol police deemed unlawful demonstration
[01:23.000 --> 01:26.000]  activity, such as crowding and obstruction.
[01:26.000 --> 01:30.000]  Apparently the protesters were sitting on the stairs of the east front of Capitol Hill.
[01:30.000 --> 01:34.000]  Democracy Spring said on their website that the protest was held to demand Congress take
[01:34.000 --> 01:38.000]  immediate action to end the corruption of big money in our politics and ensure free
[01:38.000 --> 01:39.000]  and fair elections.
[01:39.000 --> 01:44.000]  Peter Callahan, the group's communication coordinator, stated that, quote, we see populism
[01:44.000 --> 01:46.000]  on the rise on both sides of the spectrum.
[01:46.000 --> 01:50.000]  Americans are sick and tired of their politicians being bought and paid for.
[01:50.000 --> 01:59.000]  Organizers are vowing to continue the demonstration every day for the duration of a week.
[01:59.000 --> 02:03.000]  The Pentagon declared today that the first phase of military operations against the Islamic
[02:03.000 --> 02:07.000]  State in Iraq and Syria are now over and that the second phase is being implemented.
[02:07.000 --> 02:12.000]  Colonel Steve Warren, the spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition Fighting ISIS, stated that
[02:12.000 --> 02:17.000]  phase two is aimed at dismantling this enemy, while phase three is ultimately the defeat
[02:17.000 --> 02:18.000]  of ISIS.
[02:18.000 --> 02:22.000]  The first phase included the recapture of about 40 percent of the territory ISIS once
[02:22.000 --> 02:25.000]  held and the annihilation of key leaders and revenue sources.
[02:25.000 --> 02:30.000]  The second phase, now underway, is focusing on fragmenting ISIS and liberating key territories
[02:30.000 --> 02:35.000]  under their control, like taking back Mosul in Iraq and isolating Raqqa in Syria.
[02:35.000 --> 02:54.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors.
[03:05.000 --> 03:30.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors.
[03:30.000 --> 03:50.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors.
[03:50.000 --> 04:18.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors.
[04:18.000 --> 04:20.000]  Okay, howdy, howdy.
[04:20.000 --> 04:25.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio on this Thursday, the 14th day
[04:25.000 --> 04:30.000]  of April, 2016.
[04:30.000 --> 04:32.000]  And we have phones open.
[04:32.000 --> 04:34.000]  We'll keep phones open all night.
[04:34.000 --> 04:41.000]  If you have a question or comment, give us a call, 512-646-1984.
[04:41.000 --> 04:49.000]  I'm going to start out with a little more about Weatherford, Parker County, Weatherford,
[04:49.000 --> 04:50.000]  Texas.
[04:50.000 --> 04:56.000]  I have a woman there who took on the right to travel issue.
[04:56.000 --> 05:02.000]  And I've been called there before over the exact same issue.
[05:02.000 --> 05:07.000]  I had a friend out of Waco that they put him in jail there.
[05:07.000 --> 05:09.000]  They were going to keep him there for six months.
[05:09.000 --> 05:16.000]  And I went down and looked at the records and he had filed a habeas corpus.
[05:16.000 --> 05:19.000]  And there was no return on the habeas.
[05:19.000 --> 05:22.000]  So I sort of made a big stink about it.
[05:22.000 --> 05:25.000]  And a couple of days later, they got him out of there.
[05:25.000 --> 05:31.000]  But I guess they scared Mark so bad that they scared him right out of the movement.
[05:31.000 --> 05:36.000]  I haven't heard from him since he got out of jail in Waco.
[05:36.000 --> 05:38.000]  And I can't say I blame him.
[05:38.000 --> 05:44.000]  But now they have another woman in there and they gave her 90 days.
[05:44.000 --> 05:47.000]  And I went and looked at the records.
[05:47.000 --> 05:57.000]  And I found in the record that the prosecutor filed a motion in Lemony.
[05:57.000 --> 06:10.000]  A motion in Lemony is a motion asking the court to restrict certain things being brought before the court.
[06:10.000 --> 06:15.000]  Essentially, a motion in Lemony goes to all the things you can't say.
[06:15.000 --> 06:32.000]  And in the motion in Lemony, they asked the court to forbid the defendant from bringing any law or case law concerning the right to travel into court.
[06:32.000 --> 06:36.000]  And the judge approved it.
[06:36.000 --> 06:51.000]  And then in the charge to the jury, the judge made up a definition for motor vehicle and for travel.
[06:51.000 --> 06:55.000]  He made up definitions that didn't exist in law.
[06:55.000 --> 06:57.000]  So we're going back after them.
[06:57.000 --> 07:00.000]  They've got the woman in jail and they're trying to hold her in jail.
[07:00.000 --> 07:08.000]  They gave her 90 days and gave her three days per day so she could serve it out in 30 days,
[07:08.000 --> 07:16.000]  just long enough to get past the time where she could file a motion for appeal.
[07:16.000 --> 07:23.000]  First day in there, she asked for a form to file for notice of appeal.
[07:23.000 --> 07:25.000]  They refused to give it to her.
[07:25.000 --> 07:29.000]  So she filed a grievance against the jailers.
[07:29.000 --> 07:31.000]  Every day she asked for it.
[07:31.000 --> 07:32.000]  They refused.
[07:32.000 --> 07:34.000]  She filed a grievance.
[07:34.000 --> 07:38.000]  Well, when I finally found out about it from her husband,
[07:38.000 --> 07:47.000]  I went down to the sheriff's office and called the sheriff's office and got a hold of the sergeant there
[07:47.000 --> 07:53.000]  and asked the sergeant to arrest the assistant warden,
[07:53.000 --> 08:02.000]  accuse the warden of acting in concert and collusion with the judge for the purpose of denying the person
[08:02.000 --> 08:10.000]  access to the courts to prevent her from being able to appeal this bogus conviction.
[08:10.000 --> 08:26.000]  And within two hours, I find out that the warden ran down there with this form for notice of appeal
[08:26.000 --> 08:31.000]  and had her sign it and apparently got it to the court.
[08:31.000 --> 08:39.000]  Well, when I talked to the sergeant, I told the sergeant I wanted him to take a class A misdemeanor
[08:39.000 --> 08:43.000]  in Russian charge against the assistant warden.
[08:43.000 --> 08:46.000]  And he said, well, you have to talk to the jail.
[08:46.000 --> 08:59.000]  The jail is a private jail and it's manned by certified jailers, not certified peace officers.
[08:59.000 --> 09:09.000]  So I assured him I could not take my complaint to the jail as they were not peace officers and therefore could not act on my complaint.
[09:09.000 --> 09:12.000]  And he said, well, you have to take it to the jail.
[09:12.000 --> 09:19.000]  So if I bring you down a verified criminal affidavit, you might understand that you're going to refuse to act on it.
[09:19.000 --> 09:21.000]  You'll have to talk to the jail.
[09:21.000 --> 09:33.000]  So after I told the sergeant that apparently he called this assistant warden and that's when she got these documents down to this woman.
[09:33.000 --> 09:42.000]  Well, the way I read that, that's shielding from prosecution and obstruction.
[09:42.000 --> 09:50.000]  They conspired one with the other to shield her from prosecution from the act she'd already committed.
[09:50.000 --> 10:04.000]  I guess they thought if they run it down there and got it to her now that somehow all of those other times when they denied it to her would somehow stop being criminal.
[10:04.000 --> 10:16.000]  It's like I run a red light every day going to work and the policeman stops me and I say, oh, OK, I won't run that red light today.
[10:16.000 --> 10:32.000]  Well, now I go to I'll take this to the district judge, a complaint against the sergeant for conspiring with the accused to shield the accused from prosecution.
[10:32.000 --> 10:38.000]  When you try to skirt the rules, everything you do makes it worse.
[10:38.000 --> 10:41.000]  OK, we do have a caller on the line.
[10:41.000 --> 10:46.000]  We have Alan from California. Hello, Alan.
[10:46.000 --> 10:52.000]  What do you have for us today?
[10:52.000 --> 10:56.000]  OK, you need to move the mic a little way from the mouth, move down by your chin.
[10:56.000 --> 11:03.000]  You're really distorting the mic.
[11:03.000 --> 11:08.000]  Are you there, Alan?
[11:08.000 --> 11:14.000]  Well, it looks like you moved it too far from your chin because now I can't hear a word.
[11:14.000 --> 11:20.000]  I think perhaps we're having a bit of technical difficulty.
[11:20.000 --> 11:24.000]  I'll let our producer have a look at this.
[11:24.000 --> 11:27.000]  Mike, if you're talking, I'm not hearing.
[11:27.000 --> 11:31.000]  So you might try hanging up and calling back.
[11:31.000 --> 11:35.000]  Maybe we'll get a better connection.
[11:35.000 --> 11:45.000]  OK, so since we've lost Mike for the moment, I'll go back to Weatherford.
[11:45.000 --> 11:50.000]  And this is working out pretty well.
[11:50.000 --> 12:02.000]  It seems that when we're careful and we back up and think about what we're doing, these public officials always seem to be incredibly accommodating.
[12:02.000 --> 12:06.000]  And if Scott is listening out there, Scott, you need to call in.
[12:06.000 --> 12:09.000]  We want to talk about what happened to you.
[12:09.000 --> 12:16.000]  Scott's been calling in. He's been taking them on in Dallas County, filing criminal charges.
[12:16.000 --> 12:27.000]  Well, he went to court yesterday and he had put in information requests for information about the judge and the prosecuting attorney.
[12:27.000 --> 12:42.000]  And they called him into a private meeting and the judge told him that the judge felt threatened because he had asked for public information about the judge.
[12:42.000 --> 12:50.000]  Now, I would think that the judge would know better than that.
[12:50.000 --> 13:05.000]  That's witnessed tampering and obstruction for her to indicate a threat against her in order to prevent him from seeking public information.
[13:05.000 --> 13:11.000]  And the prosecutor demanded to know why he was trying to get that information.
[13:11.000 --> 13:23.000]  That is absolutely forbidden by code, 552 government code forbids a public official from asking a citizen why they're seeking information.
[13:23.000 --> 13:27.000]  So that's a class A misdemeanor.
[13:27.000 --> 13:42.000]  And then after his trial on the way home, the policeman that gave him the ticket, they sent him out to arrest him and they arrested him through him in jail over a revoked or expired license.
[13:42.000 --> 13:47.000]  They had a problem with the license that was a DPS problem.
[13:47.000 --> 13:51.000]  And he's already went to court and got that corrected.
[13:51.000 --> 13:55.000]  And they came and arrested him for it anyway.
[13:55.000 --> 14:01.000]  So now it just seems to get worse.
[14:01.000 --> 14:04.000]  Now he'll go after him for false imprisonment, retaliation.
[14:04.000 --> 14:09.000]  And he was saying these complaints are building up.
[14:09.000 --> 14:10.000]  There's going to be so many of them.
[14:10.000 --> 14:13.000]  You can't already keep up with them.
[14:13.000 --> 14:24.000]  And that's what I find every time we go to a jurisdiction and take them on based on the letter of law.
[14:24.000 --> 14:32.000]  They will give you more accusations to make against them than you can keep up with.
[14:32.000 --> 14:34.000]  OK, we do have another caller.
[14:34.000 --> 14:38.000]  I'm going to try Alan again first and see if Alan is back with us.
[14:38.000 --> 14:43.000]  Alan, are you there?
[14:43.000 --> 14:46.000]  Talk to me, Alan.
[14:46.000 --> 14:51.000]  OK, Alan, if you're talking to me, I'm getting no sound at all.
[14:51.000 --> 14:54.000]  So if you can hear me, hang up and call back in.
[14:54.000 --> 14:58.000]  OK, now I'm going to go to Kyle in Florida.
[14:58.000 --> 14:59.000]  Hello, Kyle.
[14:59.000 --> 15:04.000]  What do you have for us today?
[15:04.000 --> 15:06.000]  Hi, yeah, I was calling.
[15:06.000 --> 15:13.000]  I've been trying to get in touch with somebody about the right to travel.
[15:13.000 --> 15:15.000]  And I just called in.
[15:15.000 --> 15:16.000]  I haven't been screened.
[15:16.000 --> 15:20.000]  I was just wondering what your outlook on that is right now.
[15:20.000 --> 15:28.000]  OK, well, Eddie does the travel show on Monday night.
[15:28.000 --> 15:29.000]  Yes.
[15:29.000 --> 15:41.000]  I know some about it, but I tend not to go directly to all of the issues because I'd be kind of stepping on his toes.
[15:41.000 --> 15:46.000]  He doesn't go into due process a whole lot because that's what I do.
[15:46.000 --> 15:49.000]  But I do know some about it.
[15:49.000 --> 15:58.000]  Have you pulled up the transportation code for the state of Florida?
[15:58.000 --> 16:01.000]  No, not.
[16:01.000 --> 16:11.000]  OK, if you are going to take on the right to travel, first and foremost, you've got to do your homework.
[16:11.000 --> 16:15.000]  And it's not as difficult as you would think.
[16:15.000 --> 16:20.000]  It's not a whole lot more work than reading the newspaper in the morning.
[16:20.000 --> 16:24.000]  You get up in the morning and spend 30, 40 minutes reading the newspaper.
[16:24.000 --> 16:33.000]  You spend that much time reading the transportation code, and you'll know more about it than most of these police officers do.
[16:33.000 --> 16:35.000]  That is pitiful.
[16:35.000 --> 16:38.000]  It's horrible that I can say that under there.
[16:38.000 --> 16:40.000]  That is actually the case.
[16:40.000 --> 16:41.000]  Hang on.
[16:41.000 --> 16:42.000]  We're about to go to break.
[16:42.000 --> 16:44.000]  We'll pick this up on the other side.
[16:44.000 --> 16:47.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rue LaRue Radio.
[16:47.000 --> 16:51.000]  I call it number 512-646-1984.
[16:51.000 --> 17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.000 --> 17:09.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[17:09.000 --> 17:11.000]  And it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.000 --> 17:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.000 --> 17:25.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.000 --> 17:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:31.000 --> 17:39.000]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.000 --> 17:47.000]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:47.000 --> 17:51.000]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.000 --> 17:58.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:58.000 --> 18:00.000]  Order now.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network?
[18:05.000 --> 18:10.000]  On top of the on-air talent, producers, and other hardworking individuals working behind the scenes,
[18:10.000 --> 18:14.000]  Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you.
[18:14.000 --> 18:19.000]  And we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year in our annual fundraisers,
[18:19.000 --> 18:22.000]  which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[18:22.000 --> 18:26.000]  The 2016 fundraiser has been extended to March 17th.
[18:26.000 --> 18:29.000]  Head on over to LogosRadioNetwork.com to make your contribution.
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks.
[18:34.000 --> 18:37.000]  First prize being a Spiked Skull Lower Receiver.
[18:37.000 --> 18:39.000]  Second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[18:39.000 --> 18:45.000]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud.
[18:45.000 --> 18:50.000]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[18:50.000 --> 18:54.000]  The Logos Radio Network fundraiser now through March 17th.
[18:54.000 --> 19:00.000]  Head on over to LogosRadioNetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[19:00.000 --> 19:05.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:05.000 --> 19:32.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:35.000 --> 19:57.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:57.000 --> 20:05.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with Logos Radio and we're talking to Kyle in Florida.
[20:05.000 --> 20:08.000]  Okay, read the code first.
[20:08.000 --> 20:09.000]  Yes, sir.
[20:09.000 --> 20:12.000]  This can be a lot of fun.
[20:12.000 --> 20:17.000]  You go into court and you have no idea what's going on.
[20:17.000 --> 20:21.000]  And they pull all kind of garbage on you.
[20:21.000 --> 20:25.000]  And it's really frustrating and intimidating.
[20:25.000 --> 20:32.000]  But when you go read the code and the way I suggest you do it is there's two things you need to look at.
[20:32.000 --> 20:35.000]  You need to look at the transportation code.
[20:35.000 --> 20:42.000]  And you also need to look at the implementation of the code.
[20:42.000 --> 20:46.000]  You find such cool stuff there.
[20:46.000 --> 20:50.000]  Here in Texas, we have a Department of Public Safety.
[20:50.000 --> 20:58.000]  And they are kind of like the state police, but not really.
[20:58.000 --> 21:04.000]  You know, I was in Illinois and we had a state police and they really were state police.
[21:04.000 --> 21:07.000]  They had policing powers statewide.
[21:07.000 --> 21:13.000]  But in Texas, we've got a Department of Public Safety and they're traffic cops.
[21:13.000 --> 21:19.000]  They don't really know that they're traffic cops because they didn't read the code.
[21:19.000 --> 21:28.000]  But the administrative code says where the administrative code created the Department of Public Safety,
[21:28.000 --> 21:37.000]  it says the Department of Public Safety shall not enforce the criminal laws
[21:37.000 --> 21:46.000]  except at the request of and under the direction of local law enforcement.
[21:46.000 --> 21:49.000]  The reason being they're just traffic cops.
[21:49.000 --> 21:52.000]  They are police officers.
[21:52.000 --> 21:55.000]  Real policemen are peace officers.
[21:55.000 --> 21:58.000]  So look in Florida's code.
[21:58.000 --> 21:59.000]  Okay.
[21:59.000 --> 22:01.000]  First take the transportation code.
[22:01.000 --> 22:02.000]  You don't need to read all of it.
[22:02.000 --> 22:06.000]  You need to read the implementation part, the front part of it.
[22:06.000 --> 22:09.000]  And don't try to read it and understand it the first time.
[22:09.000 --> 22:10.000]  Just read through it.
[22:10.000 --> 22:12.000]  Just cruise right through it.
[22:12.000 --> 22:17.000]  And then go back and read the first four or five chapters and then go back and read them again.
[22:17.000 --> 22:22.000]  When you read them the second time because you've already read past where you're at
[22:22.000 --> 22:27.000]  and you come back and do it again, you'll start linking all these pieces together
[22:27.000 --> 22:30.000]  and they begin to make sense to you.
[22:30.000 --> 22:33.000]  Anything that you're charged with, read it.
[22:33.000 --> 22:35.000]  Read the code.
[22:35.000 --> 22:40.000]  Read what constitutes a violation.
[22:40.000 --> 22:49.000]  Look at all of the elements and make sure that all of the elements have been alleged.
[22:49.000 --> 22:54.000]  If they just said you were speeding, not enough.
[22:54.000 --> 22:57.000]  Look at the elements of speeding.
[22:57.000 --> 23:06.000]  And, you know, in Texas, Eddie would have more knowledge of other states' traffic code than me.
[23:06.000 --> 23:14.000]  But in Texas, Texas administrative code specifically states
[23:14.000 --> 23:22.000]  that speed limits signs are for the regulation of commercial traffic.
[23:22.000 --> 23:24.000]  Okay.
[23:24.000 --> 23:27.000]  Look in Florida, it seems to have something similar.
[23:27.000 --> 23:29.000]  And they probably do because...
[23:29.000 --> 23:31.000]  My charge.
[23:31.000 --> 23:32.000]  Go ahead.
[23:32.000 --> 23:36.000]  You have to understand how this came about.
[23:36.000 --> 23:41.000]  At least in Texas, the reason they started licensing drivers
[23:41.000 --> 23:48.000]  is because back in the 20s when we first started getting functional cars
[23:48.000 --> 23:54.000]  and then once they got cars, people started taking these cars and turning them into trucks.
[23:54.000 --> 24:01.000]  And then Ford and Chrysler and a couple others started putting out bigger equipment to use as trucks.
[24:01.000 --> 24:06.000]  Well, these things were an absolute disaster.
[24:06.000 --> 24:08.000]  They didn't have brakes.
[24:08.000 --> 24:10.000]  They had nothing for safety.
[24:10.000 --> 24:16.000]  And they were so heavy, they were destroying roads and destroying bridges.
[24:16.000 --> 24:24.000]  So the state had to do something to get this under control before everybody killed themselves.
[24:24.000 --> 24:26.000]  Right.
[24:26.000 --> 24:32.000]  Well, at the time, everybody... You see, Texas was open range.
[24:32.000 --> 24:40.000]  And because we were open range, everybody fully understood the right to travel.
[24:40.000 --> 24:42.000]  And you could travel anywhere you wanted to.
[24:42.000 --> 24:44.000]  Nobody could interfere with you.
[24:44.000 --> 24:50.000]  Even if you were crossing somebody else's property, you could do that because you had a right to travel.
[24:50.000 --> 24:52.000]  And everybody understood that.
[24:52.000 --> 24:58.000]  So when they first started putting in this licensing, they couldn't mess with people who were just traveling
[24:58.000 --> 25:01.000]  because the population would have had a fit.
[25:01.000 --> 25:09.000]  So they started licensing commercial drivers and they gradually pushed this toward everybody.
[25:09.000 --> 25:14.000]  They kind of snuck up on us with it and they brought it up on kind of slow
[25:14.000 --> 25:17.000]  and the people didn't realize what was being done.
[25:17.000 --> 25:22.000]  When it was first put in, most people were horses and buggies,
[25:22.000 --> 25:29.000]  and they fully understood that they needed some kind of regulation over these new fangled gadgets
[25:29.000 --> 25:32.000]  because they scared the heck out of my mules.
[25:32.000 --> 25:37.000]  So they didn't raise much of an issue.
[25:37.000 --> 25:45.000]  And by the time we had enough vehicles that the mass of the population was able to secure a vehicle,
[25:45.000 --> 25:48.000]  these licensing procedures were already in place.
[25:48.000 --> 25:51.000]  So they kind of snuck up on us.
[25:51.000 --> 25:52.000]  Okay.
[25:52.000 --> 25:54.000]  Well, now go back and read it.
[25:54.000 --> 25:58.000]  Now it's time for us to sneak back up on them.
[25:58.000 --> 26:01.000]  So first thing is read the codes.
[26:01.000 --> 26:03.000]  Read them twice, read them quickly.
[26:03.000 --> 26:09.000]  You don't have to study them really hard because once you've read to them a couple times,
[26:09.000 --> 26:12.000]  you get into court, they'll bring up a code, you'll remember it.
[26:12.000 --> 26:15.000]  You can take out your, you need to have a copy of the code with you.
[26:15.000 --> 26:17.000]  Take it out and check it.
[26:17.000 --> 26:19.000]  And you start taking them apart on code.
[26:19.000 --> 26:22.000]  Did they get flustered really fast?
[26:22.000 --> 26:25.000]  It makes this a lot more fun.
[26:25.000 --> 26:26.000]  Okay.
[26:26.000 --> 26:29.000]  Do you have a specific question for me?
[26:29.000 --> 26:34.000]  Well, I mean, my charge is driving with a suspended license.
[26:34.000 --> 26:37.000]  At the time, my license was canceled.
[26:37.000 --> 26:46.000]  So from what I understand, from the research that I have done is by signing your driver's license,
[26:46.000 --> 26:51.000]  you give up your rights and you enter in a contract with the state.
[26:51.000 --> 26:52.000]  No, you don't.
[26:52.000 --> 26:54.000]  Hold on, hold on.
[26:54.000 --> 26:55.000]  Okay.
[26:55.000 --> 26:59.000]  There's a lot of people out there saying that when you enter into a contract with the state,
[26:59.000 --> 27:01.000]  you give up your rights.
[27:01.000 --> 27:05.000]  Well, that's a really broad statement.
[27:05.000 --> 27:11.000]  I was pulled over in Austin and this officer asked me for my license and proof of insurance.
[27:11.000 --> 27:15.000]  And I gave him my proof of insurance and I gave him a Texas ID.
[27:15.000 --> 27:21.000]  He goes back to his car and then he comes back and he said, well, Mr. Kelton, this is a Texas ID.
[27:21.000 --> 27:24.000]  I said, yeah, as a matter of fact, it is.
[27:24.000 --> 27:27.000]  Mr. Kelton, do you have a driver's license?
[27:27.000 --> 27:30.000]  Well, he knew I did because he already checked.
[27:30.000 --> 27:36.000]  He said, yeah, I have a license, but I'm not using it right now.
[27:36.000 --> 27:40.000]  It's important we understand the distinction.
[27:40.000 --> 27:43.000]  And he said, Mr. Kelton, are you one of those guys?
[27:43.000 --> 27:45.000]  And I said, yes, I am.
[27:45.000 --> 27:48.000]  Here, have a nice day.
[27:48.000 --> 27:55.000]  So you were charged with driving on a suspended license.
[27:55.000 --> 28:00.000]  At the time, how many people were you transporting for pay?
[28:00.000 --> 28:02.000]  None.
[28:02.000 --> 28:09.000]  How much product did you have on your vehicle that you were transporting for hire?
[28:09.000 --> 28:13.000]  Absolutely none.
[28:13.000 --> 28:21.000]  What are the elements that constitute operating in commerce in Florida?
[28:21.000 --> 28:23.000]  That I don't know.
[28:23.000 --> 28:25.000]  That's something I get.
[28:25.000 --> 28:27.000]  I should have done my diligence.
[28:27.000 --> 28:29.000]  Look that up.
[28:29.000 --> 28:36.000]  And your argument can be, yeah, I had a license, but they got suspended.
[28:36.000 --> 28:43.000]  So I'm not performing commerce on the highways anymore.
[28:43.000 --> 28:46.000]  And that's what I used as my argument.
[28:46.000 --> 28:53.000]  What I had found was a brief that was created and it was online.
[28:53.000 --> 28:57.000]  It was right to travel versus driver's license.
[28:57.000 --> 29:01.000]  And that's what I had used as my basis.
[29:01.000 --> 29:03.000]  And I went in.
[29:03.000 --> 29:06.000]  I filed a motion to dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction.
[29:06.000 --> 29:08.000]  And the judge considered it.
[29:08.000 --> 29:12.000]  And I've never written a motion.
[29:12.000 --> 29:17.000]  So I don't know if he denied it because it wasn't properly written.
[29:17.000 --> 29:21.000]  But he denied it and I go to an injury trial.
[29:21.000 --> 29:26.000]  But basically when we did the motion hearing,
[29:26.000 --> 29:35.000]  I basically told him the definitions of the driver versus, you know, driver's licensing.
[29:35.000 --> 29:43.000]  And I explained to him that I was using it for my personal pleasure or transport.
[29:43.000 --> 29:44.000]  Okay, hang on.
[29:44.000 --> 29:45.000]  We're about to go to break.
[29:45.000 --> 29:48.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[29:48.000 --> 29:52.000]  I call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:52.000 --> 30:02.000]  We'll be right back.
[30:02.000 --> 30:08.000]  Are you one of the millions of Americans affected by a chronic lung disease like emphysema or asthma?
[30:08.000 --> 30:12.000]  Your next round of therapy could involve musical toe-tapping fun.
[30:12.000 --> 30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in a moment to tell you how.
[30:16.000 --> 30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.000 --> 30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.000 --> 30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:26.000 --> 30:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.000 --> 30:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:34.000 --> 30:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[30:37.000 --> 30:41.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.000 --> 30:45.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:45.000 --> 30:48.000]  Medical devices are not usually known for being fun,
[30:48.000 --> 30:55.000]  but French musician Frédéric Yannet has found a surprising alternative to his old asthma inhaler, a harmonica.
[30:55.000 --> 31:00.000]  After years of chronic asthma, Yannet picked up the harmonica and found his breathing dramatically improved.
[31:00.000 --> 31:04.000]  Pulmonologists say the harmonica is like bodybuilding for the lungs,
[31:04.000 --> 31:08.000]  and patients across the country are using it to ease their breathing troubles.
[31:08.000 --> 31:15.000]  Pulmonologist Mei Li Han explains, to play a song, you have to be able to take a deep breath in and blow out against resistance,
[31:15.000 --> 31:18.000]  which can help strengthen the respiratory muscles.
[31:18.000 --> 31:22.000]  That helps patients relax their breathing and learn to control their airwaves.
[31:22.000 --> 31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:52.000 --> 32:02.000]  Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at mqsa.org.
[32:02.000 --> 32:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:05.000 --> 32:10.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:17.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:17.000 --> 32:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:25.000]  These courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.000 --> 32:28.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:28.000 --> 32:33.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[32:33.000 --> 32:35.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.000 --> 32:40.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.000 --> 32:45.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.000 --> 32:50.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.000 --> 32:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.000 --> 32:59.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.000 --> 33:04.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:30.000 --> 33:33.000]  Okay, we are back.
[33:33.000 --> 33:38.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Kyle in Florida.
[33:38.000 --> 33:43.000]  Okay, Kyle, where were we when I cut you off there?
[33:43.000 --> 33:47.000]  I think we were talking about the motion that I filed.
[33:47.000 --> 33:54.000]  He considered it, but he denied it because I don't believe I wrote it out properly.
[33:54.000 --> 34:01.000]  And he set it for a non-jury trial, which is actually tomorrow.
[34:01.000 --> 34:04.000]  Okay, hold on, hold on.
[34:04.000 --> 34:14.000]  One thing you should do is request findings of fact and conclusions at law.
[34:14.000 --> 34:15.000]  Okay.
[34:15.000 --> 34:20.000]  You want the judge to tell you why he denied you challenge subject matter jurisdiction,
[34:20.000 --> 34:25.000]  and he will probably refuse to give it to you because in a traffic case,
[34:25.000 --> 34:34.000]  your appeal is trial de novo, meaning that it is as if it didn't happen.
[34:34.000 --> 34:37.000]  But ask for it anyway.
[34:37.000 --> 34:38.000]  Okay.
[34:38.000 --> 34:40.000]  See if you can get the judge to tell you why he did it.
[34:40.000 --> 34:44.000]  He might tell you something really stupid.
[34:44.000 --> 34:50.000]  Now, trial de novo needs a little bit of explanation.
[34:50.000 --> 34:57.000]  The court will tell you that when you appeal trial de novo,
[34:57.000 --> 35:07.000]  that it is as if the original trial didn't happen, and that is not true.
[35:07.000 --> 35:17.000]  It is as if the original trial didn't happen only for the purpose of perfecting appeal.
[35:17.000 --> 35:26.000]  If they commit any improper acts against you or deny you due process, that doesn't go away.
[35:26.000 --> 35:32.000]  Or if they say something stupid in the original court,
[35:32.000 --> 35:38.000]  when you go into the appeal court, you get to bring that in.
[35:38.000 --> 35:39.000]  Okay.
[35:39.000 --> 35:42.000]  It's called collateral estoppel.
[35:42.000 --> 35:48.000]  They can't take one position in one court and then take another in the second court.
[35:48.000 --> 35:54.000]  So if they take any legal position in the inferior court,
[35:54.000 --> 35:58.000]  that's not necessarily before a judge who's a lawyer,
[35:58.000 --> 36:04.000]  and then they come before the judge who is a lawyer and they take a different position.
[36:04.000 --> 36:08.000]  You can stop them under the doctrine of collateral estoppel.
[36:08.000 --> 36:14.000]  So when you go in trial de novo, keep in mind what happens in the original court.
[36:14.000 --> 36:23.000]  If they make a stupid admission in the original court, you can bring that into the second court.
[36:23.000 --> 36:24.000]  Okay.
[36:24.000 --> 36:37.000]  Well, so I guess another question that I have is we were also discussing the act of commerce,
[36:37.000 --> 36:46.000]  which I have already established to the court that I was not acting or engaged in commerce
[36:46.000 --> 36:51.000]  at the time of the stop, the travel stop.
[36:51.000 --> 36:59.000]  So I really am at a loss for where I go from here because...
[36:59.000 --> 37:00.000]  Okay.
[37:00.000 --> 37:04.000]  First thing, don't worry about the trial court.
[37:04.000 --> 37:12.000]  Your only purpose in the trial court is to set the record for appeal.
[37:12.000 --> 37:16.000]  You don't care what that chump judge does.
[37:16.000 --> 37:25.000]  People go into trial court and they feel betrayed when, especially traffic,
[37:25.000 --> 37:33.000]  traffic of all of the courts you'll ever go into are absolutely the worst.
[37:33.000 --> 37:36.000]  They could care less what the law says.
[37:36.000 --> 37:42.000]  They will do everything they can to get you to feel mistreated and betrayed
[37:42.000 --> 37:47.000]  so that you'll never want to come back into that court again.
[37:47.000 --> 37:52.000]  So the next time you get a ticket, you'll just go pay it and you won't bother them with the trial
[37:52.000 --> 37:54.000]  because it's all about money.
[37:54.000 --> 37:58.000]  They're trying to make money, so they have to hold trial to cost them money.
[37:58.000 --> 38:02.000]  So expect these guys to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[38:02.000 --> 38:04.000]  Just expect it.
[38:04.000 --> 38:07.000]  All you're doing is setting a record.
[38:07.000 --> 38:09.000]  So go ahead, judge, do whatever you want to.
[38:09.000 --> 38:14.000]  If you don't do it the way I like it, well, I'll just file a judicial complaint against you,
[38:14.000 --> 38:20.000]  let you dance with that, raise your bond rating until they can't afford you anymore
[38:20.000 --> 38:24.000]  and they have tossed you out on your ear.
[38:24.000 --> 38:32.000]  Understand, the guys in the traffic court, mostly the judges are lawyers
[38:32.000 --> 38:36.000]  and the prosecutors are obviously lawyers.
[38:36.000 --> 38:43.000]  Well, what do you think they're doing practicing down here in a municipal court?
[38:43.000 --> 38:45.000]  In the traffic court, yes.
[38:45.000 --> 38:50.000]  They're not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
[38:50.000 --> 38:56.000]  If they were, they'd be out making the big bucks.
[38:56.000 --> 39:01.000]  Right, they'd be higher in the higher courts, I guess.
[39:01.000 --> 39:03.000]  So these guys are chumps.
[39:03.000 --> 39:09.000]  And what do you think is going to happen when you bar-grieve that prosecutor?
[39:09.000 --> 39:14.000]  He's going to get apoplexy.
[39:14.000 --> 39:20.000]  Because you're going to double his now practice insurance.
[39:20.000 --> 39:27.000]  He's already making a living anywhere or he wouldn't be down here doing traffic court.
[39:27.000 --> 39:34.000]  Then you sting him with a bar grievance and his insurer gets it
[39:34.000 --> 39:37.000]  and they double his now practice insurance.
[39:37.000 --> 39:40.000]  That's like you getting in an accident or you getting a speeding ticket.
[39:40.000 --> 39:43.000]  That's going to make your insurance go up.
[39:43.000 --> 39:44.000]  I see.
[39:44.000 --> 39:46.000]  Well, his is too.
[39:46.000 --> 39:50.000]  But your insurance starts at probably $300, $400.
[39:50.000 --> 39:54.000]  His starts at $25,000.
[39:54.000 --> 39:55.000]  Wow.
[39:55.000 --> 39:59.000]  When his goes up, it really goes up.
[39:59.000 --> 40:07.000]  The judge, he's most likely, you know, check, make sure he's got a bar card and grieve him too.
[40:07.000 --> 40:08.000]  Right.
[40:08.000 --> 40:12.000]  Well, I mean, this particular judge, I think, I don't know.
[40:12.000 --> 40:14.000]  To me, he seems pretty fair.
[40:14.000 --> 40:20.000]  I mean, he considered the motion and he's kind of giving me a little bit of leeway
[40:20.000 --> 40:26.000]  as far as, you know, what the prosecutor, the prosecution asked a motion to strike
[40:26.000 --> 40:31.000]  because my motion wasn't properly signed or something like that.
[40:31.000 --> 40:37.000]  And he just basically denied her motion to strike and considered my motion.
[40:37.000 --> 40:42.000]  And in a sense, it's a couple hundred miles from my residence.
[40:42.000 --> 40:51.000]  So he said he would need some time to consider it and he, you know, let me go on my way.
[40:51.000 --> 40:57.000]  And I just got a letter that, you know, a couple of weeks ago stating that he denied it,
[40:57.000 --> 41:02.000]  but he didn't give any grounds for what he denied it for.
[41:02.000 --> 41:03.000]  Okay.
[41:03.000 --> 41:09.000]  If you get a judge that actually at least gives the appearance of fairness,
[41:09.000 --> 41:13.000]  absolutely do not sting him.
[41:13.000 --> 41:14.000]  No, no.
[41:14.000 --> 41:17.000]  And that's exactly what I'm trying not to do.
[41:17.000 --> 41:24.000]  But I don't know, you know, because I'm going in tomorrow and not knowing, you know,
[41:24.000 --> 41:28.000]  why he denied it, is there a way to...
[41:28.000 --> 41:36.000]  No, don't worry about it because you'll bring the same thing up when you do the appeal.
[41:36.000 --> 41:43.000]  From traffic court, an appeal is always trial de novo, so you really start all over.
[41:43.000 --> 41:45.000]  So you'll file the same motion.
[41:45.000 --> 41:48.000]  Traffic courts practice.
[41:48.000 --> 41:55.000]  And you aren't going into the worst courts, absolutely the most horrendous.
[41:55.000 --> 41:58.000]  They do the most horrible stuff.
[41:58.000 --> 42:04.000]  When you step out of that court into the county court, you step up a notch.
[42:04.000 --> 42:07.000]  Now, this judge is a real lawyer.
[42:07.000 --> 42:11.000]  He makes a lot better money than the municipal court judge does.
[42:11.000 --> 42:15.000]  And they tend to follow the rules a lot better.
[42:15.000 --> 42:25.000]  And this judge is more political because he had to get elected into this office.
[42:25.000 --> 42:28.000]  So they tend to be more professional.
[42:28.000 --> 42:31.000]  They don't tend to have as much of an attitude.
[42:31.000 --> 42:38.000]  And if they do have an attitude, you're in a position, you can adjust it for them.
[42:38.000 --> 42:44.000]  And it takes a little bit to learn that, but that judge works for you in the end.
[42:44.000 --> 42:50.000]  I get in court and the judge raised his voice to me, I want him off that bench.
[42:50.000 --> 42:56.000]  If you cannot control your personal passions, you need to get down off this bench
[42:56.000 --> 43:02.000]  and have yourself replaced with the fair and competent jurist I have a right to in the first instance.
[43:02.000 --> 43:08.000]  I do not come here to be verbally abused by my public service.
[43:08.000 --> 43:10.000]  Now, get down off that bench.
[43:10.000 --> 43:13.000]  I have done that half a dozen times.
[43:13.000 --> 43:19.000]  And that is so much fun because always the judge backs up
[43:19.000 --> 43:24.000]  and he swallows his gum and he gets his act together.
[43:24.000 --> 43:29.000]  They'll push you around if they think you'll let them.
[43:29.000 --> 43:33.000]  Some will, and then we actually have some good judges.
[43:33.000 --> 43:39.000]  But with that said, these judges get people who are always angry at them.
[43:39.000 --> 43:43.000]  And they tend to respond to that anger.
[43:43.000 --> 43:48.000]  So sometimes I understand why the judges get frustrated and angry,
[43:48.000 --> 43:51.000]  but they don't have the right to do that.
[43:51.000 --> 43:56.000]  Hang on, we're going to have to move along very quickly because we've got a lot of callers.
[43:56.000 --> 44:02.000]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[44:02.000 --> 44:06.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com
[44:06.000 --> 44:11.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street Sweet D
[44:11.000 --> 44:14.000]  here in Austin, Texas, find Brave New Books and Chase Bank
[44:14.000 --> 44:18.000]  to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:18.000 --> 44:22.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.000 --> 44:25.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including
[44:25.000 --> 44:30.000]  our Australian Emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[44:30.000 --> 44:37.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[44:37.000 --> 44:43.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.000 --> 44:47.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[44:47.000 --> 45:01.000]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[45:07.000 --> 45:11.000]  the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[45:11.000 --> 45:15.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.000 --> 45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:01.000 --> 46:14.000]  Music
[46:14.000 --> 46:37.000]  Music
[46:37.000 --> 47:02.000]  Music
[47:02.000 --> 47:09.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and Kyle, we do need to get moving along.
[47:09.000 --> 47:10.000]  Yes, sir.
[47:10.000 --> 47:15.000]  Don't worry about the trial court. Just use it as practice.
[47:15.000 --> 47:21.000]  The real action will be in the county court and that will be a lot more civil.
[47:21.000 --> 47:25.000]  Okay. Well, I guess my final question and we'll part ways.
[47:25.000 --> 47:33.000]  So when I go in, if he rules against me and finds me guilty of driving while license suspended,
[47:33.000 --> 47:40.000]  what grounds do I, what do I object on or how do I make my appeal?
[47:40.000 --> 47:41.000]  Oh, good.
[47:41.000 --> 47:42.000]  Of course.
[47:42.000 --> 47:47.000]  You just start all over with the same, you file the same challenge subject matter jurisdiction
[47:47.000 --> 47:56.000]  or this will give you time to talk to Eddie and make sure your challenge is correctly structured.
[47:56.000 --> 47:59.000]  And you just essentially start all over again.
[47:59.000 --> 48:00.000]  Okay.
[48:00.000 --> 48:07.000]  You don't appeal, on this you don't appeal on error because it's de novo.
[48:07.000 --> 48:09.000]  That's what de novo means.
[48:09.000 --> 48:17.000]  You don't have to go to the court and claim that the original trial court made a mistake in law or facts.
[48:17.000 --> 48:20.000]  You just start all over again.
[48:20.000 --> 48:25.000]  So I file de novo?
[48:25.000 --> 48:33.000]  Yeah. Well, it will be, if you file a notice of appeal, the appeal will be trial de novo.
[48:33.000 --> 48:38.000]  De novo is a matter of law. You don't have to say anything about that.
[48:38.000 --> 48:44.000]  So if he wants to sentence me to jail time, because they were talking about seven days in jail.
[48:44.000 --> 48:48.000]  Wait a minute. This is a traffic court?
[48:48.000 --> 48:53.000]  This is, well, it was, it was the original ticket.
[48:53.000 --> 48:56.000]  The deputy didn't arrest me.
[48:56.000 --> 48:59.000]  He gave me notice to appear and I guess it's circuit court.
[48:59.000 --> 49:00.000]  Okay. Okay.
[49:00.000 --> 49:06.000]  So you're not in a traffic court. No wonder I just paid more attention.
[49:06.000 --> 49:12.000]  Okay. In this case, you'll have to appeal based on rid of error.
[49:12.000 --> 49:18.000]  You need to talk to Eddie and have him look at the subject matter jurisdiction chart challenge you made.
[49:18.000 --> 49:24.000]  That'll be your primary document that you'll stand on.
[49:24.000 --> 49:27.000]  But talk to Eddie. This is not just traffic.
[49:27.000 --> 49:32.000]  I've been talking about the traffic court and you're not in traffic court.
[49:32.000 --> 49:37.000]  You're in that second level court and that's why the judge is paying more attention.
[49:37.000 --> 49:38.000]  Right.
[49:38.000 --> 49:42.000]  But talk to Eddie. He can help you better than me.
[49:42.000 --> 49:44.000]  Okay. Okay.
[49:44.000 --> 49:46.000]  Okay. Thank you, Kyle.
[49:46.000 --> 49:47.000]  Monday night.
[49:47.000 --> 49:50.000]  All right. You're welcome. You have a good night.
[49:50.000 --> 49:55.000]  Okay. Now we're going to go to Ted in Washington. Hello, Ted.
[49:55.000 --> 49:58.000]  Hi, Randy. Thank you for taking my call. Can you hear me okay?
[49:58.000 --> 50:01.000]  Yes, I can.
[50:01.000 --> 50:09.000]  Wonderful. The reason I'm calling is I needed some advice about bar grievances.
[50:09.000 --> 50:17.000]  The situation is I have a prosecuting attorney who has mistreated me verbally over the phone she hung up on me.
[50:17.000 --> 50:19.000]  That's one bar grievance.
[50:19.000 --> 50:25.000]  And then she's not responding to any email correspondence that I've been sending her.
[50:25.000 --> 50:27.000]  That's a second bar grievance.
[50:27.000 --> 50:33.000]  And I do have the confirmation that the email was read, but she chooses to ignore me.
[50:33.000 --> 50:41.000]  The catch is she's going to be the same prosecuting attorney that I have on two separate tickets, two separate issues.
[50:41.000 --> 50:49.000]  But originally when I called her, yeah, originally when I called her, I gave her both citation numbers, both ticket numbers.
[50:49.000 --> 50:55.000]  So I'm almost wondering, should I file four separate bar grievances for two for each ticket?
[50:55.000 --> 51:06.000]  No, no, no. It's not the number of citations. It is the actions that they perform.
[51:06.000 --> 51:16.000]  But make sure when you file the grievances that you file them separate and give a few days between them.
[51:16.000 --> 51:24.000]  If you make all of your accusations in one grievance, they'll treat it as one grievance.
[51:24.000 --> 51:32.000]  And they'll take the one, the accusation they consider the weakest, deny that and ignore the rest.
[51:32.000 --> 51:38.000]  So every issue for which you can grieve, grieve separately.
[51:38.000 --> 51:46.000]  It gives some space between them so they come in as physically separate accusations.
[51:46.000 --> 51:53.000]  And that's not so much for the bar association as it is for the insurance companies.
[51:53.000 --> 52:01.000]  The bar may call them all one in that case, but the insurance company won't.
[52:01.000 --> 52:07.000]  Understood. So I'll give a spacing of about three to four days in between the two separate issues.
[52:07.000 --> 52:11.000]  But my next question regarding this, should I put the case number into the grievance?
[52:11.000 --> 52:16.000]  There's a field on their website that asks for the case number. Should I or should I not?
[52:16.000 --> 52:23.000]  Yeah, put it in there. But understand about the bar grievance. They're not going to do anything.
[52:23.000 --> 52:31.000]  The bar associations are just a public relations agency for the lawyers.
[52:31.000 --> 52:38.000]  For those people who haven't had to deal with these lawyers, they give everybody the impression that,
[52:38.000 --> 52:46.000]  oh, yeah, we have an oversight agency. The truth is they don't have squat. So they're just there for show.
[52:46.000 --> 52:52.000]  So they're going to rule again. They're going to trash your grievance no matter what you do.
[52:52.000 --> 52:57.000]  So yeah, give me anything you want. You don't care.
[52:57.000 --> 53:01.000]  Except personal information is none of their business.
[53:01.000 --> 53:09.000]  And in Texas, when you get the bar form, they ask for a lot of information that's none of their business.
[53:09.000 --> 53:11.000]  Okay.
[53:11.000 --> 53:19.000]  Your personal information, how much you make, who your neighbors are, that's none of their business.
[53:19.000 --> 53:23.000]  Exactly. Correct. It's just only facts pertaining to the case.
[53:23.000 --> 53:25.000]  Exactly.
[53:25.000 --> 53:26.000]  All right.
[53:26.000 --> 53:36.000]  What they want to do is they want to pigeonhole you so they can decide whether or not they think you're credible.
[53:36.000 --> 53:46.000]  The problem is they want to find out if you're a high-level public official that's going to sting them good or something.
[53:46.000 --> 53:52.000]  But only give them what's relevant. They're going to toss it anyway.
[53:52.000 --> 53:57.000]  Oh, I've done this before on a different issue a few years ago, and that's exactly what happened.
[53:57.000 --> 54:05.000]  They tossed it. But I was really happy with how more civilized they were acting in court after the grievance.
[54:05.000 --> 54:08.000]  Funny how that works.
[54:08.000 --> 54:12.000]  Yeah, yeah. It puts it in their place.
[54:12.000 --> 54:23.000]  It always stings them. And if you sting them early, it makes it easier as you go down the line.
[54:23.000 --> 54:28.000]  Okay. It sounds like you have some experience with these, and that's what I'd like to hear.
[54:28.000 --> 54:36.000]  And I know it sounds like that I'm against lawyers, but I'm not.
[54:36.000 --> 54:44.000]  I understand the position lawyers are in, and I feel for them.
[54:44.000 --> 54:47.000]  I just can't reach them.
[54:47.000 --> 54:53.000]  It's not about the lawyer. We're not doing this to harm the lawyer.
[54:53.000 --> 54:57.000]  We're doing this to get the system working right.
[54:57.000 --> 55:01.000]  And it's kind of like my grandkids if they run out in the road.
[55:01.000 --> 55:07.000]  You know, I love my grandkids dearly, but if one of them runs out in the road, I'm fixing to tan his hide.
[55:07.000 --> 55:12.000]  It's not out of anger or meanness or spite.
[55:12.000 --> 55:15.000]  It's the right thing.
[55:15.000 --> 55:22.000]  And you're not grieving these lawyers to be difficult or cause them misery.
[55:22.000 --> 55:28.000]  Now they can go to the judge and say, Judge, I got to do the right thing.
[55:28.000 --> 55:32.000]  Because if I don't, this guy's going to sting me good.
[55:32.000 --> 55:36.000]  You give the lawyer possible deniability.
[55:36.000 --> 55:38.000]  Ooh, I like it.
[55:38.000 --> 55:43.000]  Is that a nice rationalization or what?
[55:43.000 --> 55:45.000]  Very much so.
[55:45.000 --> 55:53.000]  Well, really quick, you've heard that joke why you will never find an attorney at the beach at the ocean.
[55:53.000 --> 55:54.000]  No, I haven't heard that one.
[55:54.000 --> 55:57.000]  Cats keep trying to bury them in the sand.
[55:57.000 --> 56:00.000]  Oh, okay.
[56:00.000 --> 56:03.000]  I was just asked today.
[56:03.000 --> 56:06.000]  That's keeping it to me.
[56:06.000 --> 56:11.000]  I was just asked today at the sheriff's department if I was a lawyer.
[56:11.000 --> 56:13.000]  Oh, no.
[56:13.000 --> 56:16.000]  I sleep well at night and keep my hands in my own pockets.
[56:16.000 --> 56:18.000]  Thank you very much.
[56:18.000 --> 56:19.000]  Ooh, I like that.
[56:19.000 --> 56:20.000]  That's a good one.
[56:20.000 --> 56:26.000]  I once filed a really habeas corpus for a kid in Conroe.
[56:26.000 --> 56:29.000]  Now, that's down just north of Houston.
[56:29.000 --> 56:34.000]  And they stopped a murder trial to hear the writ.
[56:34.000 --> 56:39.000]  And I get in front of the judge, and I was warned this is the meanest judge in the district.
[56:39.000 --> 56:44.000]  And to get in front of the judge's name was Montgomery.
[56:44.000 --> 56:50.000]  Stopped the trial, and he looked at my writ, and he said, Mr. Kelton, are you an attorney?
[56:50.000 --> 56:52.000]  Oh, no, Judge.
[56:52.000 --> 56:54.000]  Sleep well at night and keep your hands in my own pockets.
[56:54.000 --> 56:55.000]  Thank you very much.
[56:55.000 --> 57:03.000]  But he didn't take that too well and said that since I wasn't an attorney, he wasn't going to accept my writ.
[57:03.000 --> 57:04.000]  I turned to the bailiff.
[57:04.000 --> 57:06.000]  Mr. Bailiff, did you hear that?
[57:06.000 --> 57:08.000]  Yes, Mr. Kelton, I did.
[57:08.000 --> 57:11.000]  I repressed that judge.
[57:11.000 --> 57:15.000]  Oh, that was so much fun.
[57:15.000 --> 57:21.000]  You haven't lived until you've asked the bailiff to arrest the judge at least once.
[57:21.000 --> 57:30.000]  Every time I've done that, the judge has sat there and kept his mouth shut.
[57:30.000 --> 57:37.000]  Because if he opens his mouth while I'm trying to get the bailiff to arrest him, that's obstruction.
[57:37.000 --> 57:44.000]  And if he says anything I can take is threatening, that's witness tampering.
[57:44.000 --> 57:51.000]  So what happens in a scenario like that, because I'm sure the bailiff and the judge, they're buddy buddies.
[57:51.000 --> 57:54.000]  They probably go golfing together, they're friends.
[57:54.000 --> 57:57.000]  Yeah, and the bailiff's terrified of the judge.
[57:57.000 --> 58:03.000]  And I always tell the bailiff when he refuses, well, Bubba, life is filled with little decisions.
[58:03.000 --> 58:05.000]  We all get to make some.
[58:05.000 --> 58:11.000]  Are you going to perform your duty and keep the peace in the courtroom regardless of who breaches it?
[58:11.000 --> 58:15.000]  Or are you going to shield that judge from prosecution?
[58:15.000 --> 58:21.000]  Now, when it gets down to it, which one of you two do you think they'll throw under the bus?
[58:21.000 --> 58:23.000]  Good luck.
[58:23.000 --> 58:26.000]  Yeah, fine.
[58:26.000 --> 58:28.000]  Okay, we're about to go to break.
[58:28.000 --> 58:31.000]  Do we have any more for you, Ted?
[58:31.000 --> 58:34.000]  Yes, thank you so much. I'm satisfied. I appreciate it.
[58:34.000 --> 58:41.000]  Okay, thank you, Ted. Randy Kelton, the creator of our video. I call it number 512-646-1984.
[58:41.000 --> 58:50.000]  Mark Urban, I see you there. We'll pick you up on the other side. We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:58.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:06.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:18.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:27.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:47.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.000 --> 59:50.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:22.000]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing you deli bulletins for the commodities market, Today in History, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  Markets for Monday, the 4th of April, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,215.51 an ounce, silver at $14.96 an ounce, Texas crude at $36.79 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $418 U.S. currency.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  Today in History, the year 1968, African-American U.S. civil rights activist and minister Martin Luther King Jr. is assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee.
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:01.000]  He was shot while standing on the balcony at the Lorraine Motel where he and his team of civil rights activists were staying at.
[01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  A circuit court of Shelby County, Tennessee, 13th Judicial District at Memphis in December of 1999, found that unspecified U.S. government agencies were complicit and guilty in the assassination.
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:20.000]  After Martin Luther King Jr. was shot and pronounced dead, Today in History.
[01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:29.000]  In recent news, New York Democratic Senator Charles Schumer called on the Federal Department of Justice and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to investigate a gun that appears to look like an iPhone.
[01:01:29.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  The manufacturer Ideal Conceal said that the government's concern over the weapon is misplaced.
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  CEO Kirk Gilbert said the gun is expected to be ready for market later in the year.
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  Images of the weapon on the company's Facebook page show it appears to be a regular smartphone case.
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  However, it's just not any case since this one opens up into a.38 caliber handgun.
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  List price is expected to be around $395 U.S. dollars.
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:02:01.000]  Gilbert, who has a concealed carry license himself, says he came up with the idea for the gun after a young child in a restaurant caught a glimpse of his more obvious weapon and pointed it out in public.
[01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  Schumer is arguing that the gun, which appears like an everyday item, could violate federal law,
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:14.000]  which is why he requested today that the Justice Department and the ATF investigate.
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:19.000]  A small fire today forced the evacuation of the Internal Revenue Service's headquarters in Washington, D.C.
[01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:26.000]  Apparently, the building was closed around 2.45 in the afternoon due to electrical issues concerning the heating and air conditioning systems.
[01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:32.000]  Of the 2,000 people or so who worked in the building, many had already left before the fire started around 3.30 when it was reported.
[01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:40.000]  The small fire, which was apparently contained to only one room in the basement, was in fact related to electrical issues, though the direct cause is still under investigation.
[01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:48.000]  Luckily, the IRS assured the public that tax returns are not processed at this particular building and will thus have no effect on tax return processing.
[01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:52.000]  There were no reported injuries.
[01:02:52.000 --> 01:03:02.000]  This is Rick Roady with the Lowdown for April 4, 2016.
[01:03:22.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  This is Rick Roady with the Lowdown for April 4, 2016.
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:04:06.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Felton, Rue of La Radio, and we're going to Mark in Wisconsin.
[01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:12.000]  Okay, Mark, I know you've been causing trouble. What have you been up to lately?
[01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:22.000]  Well, I'm thinking about causing more trouble in an entirely different direction and looking for your, put your thinking cap on.
[01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  I'm sure you're aware of the Panama Papers, right?
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:28.000]  Yes, I am.
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  All right. How do I go ahead and get a legal copy of the 2.6 terabytes?
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:48.000]  I can't figure out a way to get a legal copy, but the only thing I can do is approach the fine people who run the state of Wisconsin judiciary and say,
[01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:56.000]  I want you to declare my getting this is a perfectly legal thing. I might have to go to the feds afterwards.
[01:04:56.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  Okay. I've heard of them, but give me the background on how I understand they were leaked from a law firm.
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  That's correct. The documents were taken from a law firm. I'm sure that they otherwise qualify as stolen documents. However, you know, they're now out there.
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  Somebody who is holding them who didn't steal them.
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  Correct.
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  Is that party, a public, holding them in some official capacity?
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:48.000]  In the state of Wisconsin, I'm unaware of that, but that may be a very good question to ask as a starting point.
[01:05:48.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  Because if they're holding them in an official capacity, either they have been legitimately declared as secret or their public information.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  Good point.
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:34.000]  So if whatever governmental agencies collected a missing will maintain the documents, if they are a federal agency, they fall under FOIA. And if these are papers from a foreign country law firm, has the law firm filed any kind of legal action?
[01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:50.000]  Not that I am aware of, but you know, I have not dug deeply into the topic. I'm sure they did send out a notice to the account holders saying,
[01:06:50.000 --> 01:07:05.000]  if you've been got this notice today, you are not part of the leaked set of documents or we don't believe you've been impacted that badly. If you were impacted, we would have already talked to you.
[01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  And they did in that notice, I believe they did the traditional huffing and puffing and going, you know, this is, this is illegal in some way, shape or form.
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:22.000]  And that may restrict access to it.
[01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:38.000]  Even if the person who's holding it didn't steal the documents, if they received them from some other party with in a manner that did not render them culpable.
[01:07:38.000 --> 01:08:00.000]  Even so, if they're holding documents that have the potential to cause harm and those documents were intended to be secret or confidential and they were illegally taken, then however you slice that up, you're in possession of illegal documents.
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:13.000]  Right. And what I'm trying to do is get to a, getting some form of paperwork going, no, no, no, in the interest of public whatever, you can have a copy of these documents.
[01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:26.000]  And so I'm trying to get from the illegal and get them so that it's legal and unfortunately almost all of the paths that I see terminate in,
[01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  you can't ask us to do anything because, well, you haven't been harmed yet by being called a criminal and being charged.
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:44.000]  So then you could appeal to us saying, no, it's perfectly fine.
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  I'm trying to think of a way that I could legitimately demand access to records that were stolen from someone's private archives.
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  Right. And I can't figure that. I do like the, you're a public official, you have a copy, give it to me and I can certainly make those demands and that is a very reasonable and well-trodden path.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:34.000]  And then they have to do something to withhold them and I suspect they probably would. I can envision where I could hold these papers and not be liable, even though I knew they were taken illegally.
[01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:49.000]  If someone gave them to me and I didn't ask for them, say they just sent them to me in the mail, then I can hold them and not be culpable.
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  But when I seek these documents out, knowing that they were stolen, I begin to step in deep water unless I request them legally from a public agency.
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:17.000]  Right. I do like the request them legally from the public agency. I had not thought of that and that's why I was reaching out to you.
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:33.000]  Okay. Well, there was a time in Open Records, I've done a lot of work in Open Records, especially here in Texas, where I went in and asked, this was several years ago and they were just beginning to get everything computerized.
[01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  So there was a lot of confusion, a lot of records I was having trouble getting to and these agencies are telling me that I can't see these because they're in your computer.
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:51.000]  I said, well, let me look at your computer. Oh, you can't see what's in the computer. It's your account. If you're keeping those records in the computer, then I want to see them.
[01:10:51.000 --> 01:11:20.000]  And I got an opinion from the state attorney general that either the agency had to run a search on their system or I could have my own person write the search for their system and their people could test it to make sure it wouldn't harm the system and they'd have to run the search for me.
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  But in order for me to do that, I would have to have their software, you know, they jumped up and down and rail to this private software, this belongs to a particular company over here.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:44.000]  I said, well, so what? They sold it to the government so that the government could use it to house public documents. I have a right to access those documents.
[01:11:44.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  They said, well, these are copyrighted materials. I said, well, if I breach the copyright, that's between me and the company who sold you their software, not your business.
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:03.000]  And that's what the attorney general said.
[01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  They had to release the software. If the company that sold them to them felt I had violated their copyright, then they could take action.
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:25.000]  But the state could not withhold records in order to protect a third party's copyright.
[01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:34.000]  So essentially, these guys are going to say, well, someone else will have a problem with this if I give you those records.
[01:12:34.000 --> 01:12:39.000]  They're a problem, not my problem.
[01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  Certainly not your problem, not your business. So you might be able to get them that way.
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:56.000]  What goes to international law? Since it's in Panama and to here, international law is really complex.
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:13:18.000]  A lot of things are just not covered. And hacking a foreign private company's database from another country may or may not be illegal. If you're in China, it's not illegal. China does it.
[01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:29.000]  Well, in fact, in Taiwan, having spent some time looking at these issues, apparently Taiwan and China,
[01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:40.000]  it's considered perfectly valid form to attempt to attack the other law firm's computers to gain an advantage.
[01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:48.000]  So there may not, you know, we don't know how other laws are in Panama. It may be perfectly all right to do that.
[01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  Because what you're saying about this firm, the firm looks like they're out trying to put out fires.
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  But I haven't heard them railing in righteous indignation about being robbed from.
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:14.000]  No, they haven't. They haven't been railing. It's been quiet up until recently. And of course, it's slowly disappearing off of the US news cycles.
[01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  In other countries, they're having no end of issues over it. But here, you know, nothing in the news.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:35.000]  It may be that the company just wants it to go away and don't want to make a lot of noise. If they try to fight the issues, all they do is make it more public.
[01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:37.000]  Right.
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:44.000]  It's not always about the law. That perception is everything.
[01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  Yeah. Well, why do you think I'm interested in this? Certainly the law is kind of secondary. It's the fight for the sake of the fight.
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:08.000]  You come to like the fire way too much, I think. Or maybe not.
[01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:20.000]  It's, you know, at a certain point, it's like, OK, let's see how outrageous the other, the lawyer's conduct can be and have these people go,
[01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  oh, there's no problem here. The one of the examples of that from the bankruptcy court, the one set of attorneys argued that,
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:41.000]  oh, we can't tell you this information because we're worried about being sued ultimately by the person who's going through the bankruptcy.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  And we are the ones who own the magic recipe here that's being asked for.
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:57.000]  I called up the set of attorneys, explained and gave them copies of the modified document that was being used to, the modified document in a different courthouse.
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:04.000]  Three days later, the set of attorneys quit and new set of attorneys came in and the new set of attorneys changed the argument entirely and said,
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  no, no, no, we only sold the guy raw spices. We don't know anything.
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:19.000]  And the bankruptcy court, in the interest of just getting the case gone, went, OK. Judge spent 30 minutes grilling the attorneys.
[01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:27.000]  The attorney just went, no, just sold them raw spices, no magic recipe here, nothing to see.
[01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  And the bankruptcy judge went, OK, fine, we're done. And, you know, true it out.
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  OK, hang on, got to go to break.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  Randy Kelton, rule of our radio, our caller number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:26.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:33.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:38.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network?
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:10.000]  On top of the on-air talents, producers and other hardworking individuals working behind the scenes,
[01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:14.000]  Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you.
[01:18:14.000 --> 01:18:19.000]  And we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year on our annual fundraisers,
[01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:26.000]  The 2016 fundraiser has been extended to March 17.
[01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:30.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution.
[01:18:30.000 --> 01:18:35.000]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks.
[01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:38.000]  First prize being a Spiked Skull Lower Receiver.
[01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  Second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:54.000]  The Logos Radio Network fundraiser now through March 17.
[01:18:54.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air.
[01:19:24.000 --> 01:19:48.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:50.000]  Randy Kelton, Root of La Radio.
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:52.000]  And we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin.
[01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  Okay, Mark, where are we?
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:57.000]  Is that the only question or do we have another?
[01:19:57.000 --> 01:20:04.000]  I was just pointing out the particular case with the bankruptcy.
[01:20:04.000 --> 01:20:10.000]  Ultimately, those attorneys shouldn't have made an entirely different argument
[01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  because they're supposed to review the case and become knowledgeable to what the client is claiming.
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  And so, you know, they have hearings in front of the judge that, oh, there's recipes.
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  And then they come in and say, oh, no, no, no, there were no recipes.
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:29.000]  It was just raw spices.
[01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:41.000]  So at a certain point, I can't say every attorney I met has been a liar, but man, there seems to be a lot of them.
[01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  Lawyers, it's their job.
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:53.000]  It's their job to twist the facts to suit their client's position.
[01:20:53.000 --> 01:20:59.000]  So the only time a lawyer is lying is when his lips are moving.
[01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  Yeah, that's true, too.
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:09.000]  But for those of us who know how to sting them, it works.
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  They give us opportunity to sting them good.
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:21.000]  So in order to keep them from lying, we just have to give them plausible deniability.
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  If they're afraid that every one of these no-good prostate rascals are going to start filing bar agreements against us,
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  they'll get more reluctant to do that.
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  Well, two lawyers have up and quit once I contacted them and explained the situation to them.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:43.000]  They quit within, you know, three to five days.
[01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:46.000]  They said, ah, that's enough.
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:50.000]  So the more honest ones get out of the way.
[01:21:50.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  The less honest ones, well, it's a separate issue, I guess.
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  You're probably getting ones that aren't quite so arrogant.
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:07.000]  And the more we hammer them, the more honest they'll be.
[01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:11.000]  You know, I couldn't be a lawyer.
[01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:14.000]  Lawyers are afraid of everything.
[01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:16.000]  You know, they're trying to make money.
[01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:20.000]  We're graduating 40,000 lawyers a year.
[01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:25.000]  We have more lawyers in this country than any other country in the world.
[01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  The U.S. is more litigious because we've got too many lawyers.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:34.000]  So the ones that are out there are struggling.
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:39.000]  So they're afraid of everything.
[01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:47.000]  And then they come across guys like us, and that makes them even more, now they're afraid of their clients.
[01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:51.000]  Well, keep in mind that unemployed lawyers become politicians.
[01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  So it's always a good idea to pay your lawyer.
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  You've got a point there.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:22:57.000]  Okay.
[01:22:57.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  Do you have anything else for us?
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:01.000]  We might not leave you and have you move on to the next caller.
[01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  Maybe you'll be able to solve their problems like you gave me a couple of new rabbit trails to run down.
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  Okay.
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:11.000]  Well, have fun, Mark.
[01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  Okay.
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:16.000]  Now we're going to go to Irvin in Nevada.
[01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  Hello, Irvin.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  Hello, Randy.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:29.000]  I only became aware of your videos on YouTube maybe a few weeks ago, and the ones I see there are a few years old.
[01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  But one, you mentioned that the notion that there can be no prohibition, that there's no injured party is simply not true.
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:42.000]  When the penal statute was violated, the state is necessarily an injured party by the violation.
[01:23:42.000 --> 01:23:51.000]  By coincidence, my wife and I were trying to bring charges against a notary who was involved in our home from a few years ago.
[01:23:51.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  And she basically changed the date and nothing on our presence.
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  And there were various statutes that said, you know, that that's a crime.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  It may be only a misdemeanor, but it's a crime.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  And when we went to the – we called the DA's office and he said, well, I can't do anything unless you take it to the police and they decide whether it's what it's doing.
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:19.000]  And when we went to the floor department of the police, they kept saying, but how are you harmed?
[01:24:19.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  And at that time when we visited them, I didn't – that was just a couple days before I saw that video of you mentioning that.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:33.000]  Now, there is some possible harm that this had to do with precision, which I'll hopefully touch upon in a few minutes.
[01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  Even if it's not the case, the DA said that.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  We also contacted the attorney general's office and he basically said, well, limited resources and we don't get involved in that kind of stuff.
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  Even though in Nevada, they did go after two notaries with LPS a few years ago with like 600 charges of fraud against two notaries who were in the title company.
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  So my first question is, is there – I mean, do I ask the chief of police?
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  Okay. Let me back up to what the notaries did.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  Right.
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  Did they change the date on an acknowledgement?
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  Acknowledgement and also the deed of trust even, which, you know, I figured that's sworn testimony and part of the public record and they don't have any right to alter or modify it.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  That's my attitude.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  Okay. When you took that as – okay, that's tampering with the government document.
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  Okay.
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  I haven't had a policeman ever say something that's stupid to me like, how were you harmed?
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  Say, are you kidding me? I'm not suing them.
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:47.000]  I'm giving you notice that a crime has been committed invoking your duty to suppress crime like you swore to on your oath you would.
[01:25:47.000 --> 01:26:01.000]  And so in Nevada, the prosecutor is saying that the police department has prosecutorial discretion. How did they get that?
[01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:06.000]  That was the DA, Randy. First of all, she went to the DA and he told us to go to the police and went to the police.
[01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  Okay.
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  What we're talking about here is practice and policy, not law.
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:23.000]  And in every state I've looked at, the requirements were essentially the same except Pennsylvania.
[01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  I'll explain that in a second.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  All criminal complaints, all notice of crime is directed to some magistrate, not to the police, not to the prosecutor, but to some magistrate.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:50.000]  But the prosecutors and the police, they get out here and they try to keep the peace.
[01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  And they don't always charge someone because they could.
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  They're limited on funds. They're limited on personnel.
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  So they try to pursue the kinds of crimes that cause everybody the most grief.
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  And okay, if you're a policeman, it's understandable that you would do that because you just can't arrest everybody.
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:28.000]  So you got to kind of meter your resources. And the prosecutor is the same way.
[01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  So they have these problems and issues they have to deal with.
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  Their problems, not my problems.
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:46.000]  My problems, I had someone tampered with a government document to my detriment.
[01:27:46.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  And I need this person prosecuted for this act. You don't want to prosecute them?
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  I don't care what you want.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  If you go to the police officer and they refuse to act on your complaint, the way I read it, that's official misconduct.
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  If it were taxes, it would be official oppression because we have a special statute for that.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  But in every other state, it's official misconduct.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  A public official fails to perform a duty he's required to perform and in the process denies you an equal protection of the laws.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:18.000]  That's a crime in every state I've looked at.
[01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:23.000]  And it's also a federal crime under Article U.S. Code 242.
[01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:29.000]  Every state has a statute that reflects 18 U.S. Code 242.
[01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  So the way we get them to do their job is I go to the police.
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  I went to the police recently in Parker County, Texas, just west of Fort Worth.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:51.000]  Actually, yesterday I called the sheriff's department and asked for a supervisor and got a sergeant and asked him to arrest
[01:28:51.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  the assistant warden for the Parker County Jail for obstruction of justice and official oppression.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:05.000]  And he refused. He refused to take my complaint.
[01:29:05.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  He said, you need to talk to the jail.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:09.000]  So I can't talk to the jail because jailers are not peace officers.
[01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  They can't take criminal complaints.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  Well, I finally asked him, if I bring a verified criminal affidavit, will you refuse to take it? Well, you're going to have to talk to the jail.
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  OK. Two hours after I talked to him, the assistant warden went to the woman in jail.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  They were not allowed access to the court and gave her access to the court.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  So that tells me the sergeant talked to her and conspired with her to shield her from prosecution by getting her to go fix the problem that all this had caused.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  Hang on. I'll tell you how we handle this when we get back.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio. I call it number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:08.000]  You've heard of hairspray, but how about DNA spray? It's a high tech way to catch robbers. But down the road, it could be abused.
[01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:14.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with what you need to know about aerosol microdots.
[01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:19.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:24.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:24.000 --> 01:30:29.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:39.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:43.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:51.000]  Exploding ink can cover thieves in a profusion of purple, but nowadays they need to look out for spray-on polka dots the size of pinheads, too.
[01:30:51.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  The SelectiMark security system uses DNA spray on robbers as they make a getaway.
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  The coating glows under ultraviolet light for weeks, and police can identify the crime scene because the spray contains unique microdots.
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  While it's currently used to nab criminals, the spray could be turned to other purposes.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  Imagine attending a political rally and later glowing under ultraviolet light at the airport.
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:20.000]  It could give a whole new meaning to the no-fly list. Maybe we should all be wary of DNA spray.
[01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correctional. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their Kim Trails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the Kim Trails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:26.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement. May not actually be kidding about Kim Trails.
[01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:29.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:39.000]  Okay, we are back. Brandy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Irving in Nevada.
[01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:49.000]  In handling these guys, one of the things we need to do is change our perspective.
[01:33:49.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  We go to these public officials and ask them to do what the law requires them to do, and they do what they want to do.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  They do what they feel like they need to do.
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  Well, I don't really care what they feel like they need to do. I care what the law says.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  So to keep from feeling betrayed by our public officials and mistreated by them, we take a whole different approach.
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  See, when I go into a courthouse or a public building, I am the baddest motor scooter in the building.
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:38.000]  And there's only one reason I'm the baddest motor scooter in the building.
[01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:46.000]  It's because I'm not a judge, a prosecutor, a bailiff, a clerk, a police officer.
[01:34:46.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  They're all public servants. They're the servants. Me, I am the master, and they are not to forget it.
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  When I as the master go in and invoke the duty of one of my servants,
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:16.000]  they will either perform their duty or I will go to the next official in line and invoke that official's duty to arrest the first one.
[01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:26.000]  And then when that one refuses, I'll go to the next one over him and invoke his duty to arrest the second one.
[01:35:26.000 --> 01:35:36.000]  So politics. You'll never win your case simply because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  It doesn't work that way. You only win your case if you have the politics on your side.
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  Police are not going to enforce the law just because somebody broke the law.
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  They're going to enforce the law because they have to.
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  They're going to enforce the laws that are most important to that policeman and his personal political position at the moment.
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  He's going to do what his boss wants him to do. And if that's blowing you off, he don't care.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  So what you do is you go in there and take them to task for not doing what the law requires them to do.
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  We need people doing this. We pay our policemen and send them out to police us.
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:45.000]  We want them to police us to keep us from losing track of what's important, to keep us from indulging in our distraction.
[01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  We don't run that red light not because we think somebody's likely to sneak around the corner and smash into us and kill us.
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:37:03.000]  We don't run that red light because we think there's some dirty rotten scoundrel cop parked right around that corner waiting to nail me for that.
[01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:12.000]  And in that way, they protect us from ourselves. We owe them the same courtesy.
[01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:17.000]  Yeah, I have to sting them on occasion. But that life is tough.
[01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  I filed criminal charges against public officials with the grand jury.
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:27.000]  But I never want one of these guys indicted.
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  But then I didn't want them to do anything that would give me cause to file against them either.
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:48.000]  So, sorry guys, life is tough. When you start thinking of your officials in that way, everything changes.
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:38:02.000]  You get a lot better results and our officials, they find out that they have to pay a whole lot more attention to you and I as ordinary citizens because we can sting them good.
[01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:10.000]  So, with all that said, Irvin, what is it that you want to accomplish?
[01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:14.000]  Well, one of the things I neglected to mention, the notary question.
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  We did go to the Nevada Secretary of State to complain about her.
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  And she sent a copy of her notary journal showing that the documents are signed on the date that she said, not on the date that we said.
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  We think that the journal has been tampered with her. It was like a phone shot pretty crudely.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  But again, she sent a copy. So, we got into a lawsuit. We might have to go through discovery and all that.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:47.000]  But if we file a criminal complaint, we assume that law enforcement people can get hold of that pretty quickly and do a pretty simple test.
[01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  So, we want to be able to press charges. I don't know whether we should try to go to the chief of police or kind of sign me there.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:39:00.000]  I suggest the first thing you do is write up a statement of facts.
[01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  And here's how you create a statement of facts. You start out with a timeline.
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  This happened and this happened and this happened. No explanation. Just what happened and when.
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:20.000]  Once you have a timeline down, then go back and start filling in facts.
[01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  And it's difficult for a non-professional to write a statement of facts because it's hard for us to separate facts from our beliefs or opinions about those facts.
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:48.000]  So, a really neat way to do that is write down a fact and then end that sentence with in my opinion.
[01:39:48.000 --> 01:39:57.000]  If you append in my opinion to the end of the sentence and it makes sense, scratch it out. It's not a fact.
[01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:02.000]  If it doesn't make sense, then it's most likely a fact.
[01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  So, get a statement of facts. There's kind of an art to this.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  It looks like just bare facts. They did this. They did this. They did this. They did this.
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  Now, when a human being reads your statement of facts, they're going to try to fill in all those explanations that you didn't give them.
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:34.000]  So, once you have all of your facts down, now you go back and construct a story.
[01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  A story explaining what happened.
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  Then you go back and look at your facts. Which facts, if a person read them in order, would lead them to the conclusions that you want them to come to?
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  Which facts would tend to either distract them or confuse them?
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  Take those out. Unless they're material. If they're material, then explain why they're not important.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  But try to lay the facts out in a way so that when a person reads them and they draw logical conclusions,
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:20.000]  they'll tend to come to the conclusions that you made in your statement.
[01:41:20.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  That way, we assume it's written for a judge. The judge reads the statement of facts first, and then he reads your argument in support of your statement of factual accusation.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  And you come to the same conclusions he came to, and he thinks you're really smart.
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:47.000]  And he will tend to accept what you say. So, start out with a good statement of facts.
[01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:55.000]  And then write a criminal affidavit, a criminal complaint.
[01:41:55.000 --> 01:42:04.000]  You can go down and look into criminal courts and pull any criminal case and look at an information.
[01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:11.000]  An information is a document that a prosecutor writes when he gets a complaint.
[01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:18.000]  The complaint is intended to be received from a private citizen, non-professional.
[01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  The lawyer then takes that complaint and writes it in the form of an information.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:30.000]  And what the information is, is this is technically how a complaint should be written.
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:40.000]  So, look in a criminal file and pull out an information and see how it's styled. And just change information to complaint.
[01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:49.000]  And then write up a criminal complaint and take that to a police officer.
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  Okay, what that does is, is you give notice to the officer that a crime has been committed.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  You're not asking him for his opinion.
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:13.000]  You are a, if you're above the age of 18, never been convicted of a felony, you are a credible person by legal definition.
[01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  So, when a credible person makes it known to a police officer by way of a verified criminal affidavit that a crime has been committed,
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:29.000]  it invokes the officer's duty to take that complaint and give it to some magistrate.
[01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  But he's not going to do that. He's only going to give it to the magistrate if he thinks it should be prosecuted.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  Well, that'll work. When he doesn't give it to the magistrate, then you make up a complaint against the officer
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  for not acting against the original actor.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:59.000]  Now the officer's going to be real unhappy. He'll look straight in the next step when we come back.
[01:43:59.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:50.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:04.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:27.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:30.000]  And we're talking to Irving in Nevada.
[01:46:30.000 --> 01:46:34.000]  Irving, this is a process.
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:42.000]  If you want them to go after the notary, you've got to give them a political reason too.
[01:46:42.000 --> 01:46:48.000]  So you kick the officer by filing against him with somebody over him.
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:53.000]  And then when that person tries to protect the officer, you go over him.
[01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:58.000]  You see, we're the masters, we're the CEOs.
[01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:01.000]  Everybody answers to us.
[01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  They just don't want us to know that.
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:09.000]  And as you start working your way up the line, the heat gets on.
[01:47:09.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  It creates politics.
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:16.000]  In the case I mentioned earlier, calling the sheriff.
[01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:20.000]  The phones lit up immediately as soon as I got off the phone,
[01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  and this assistant warden couldn't get down there fast enough to get this problem fixed
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:33.000]  because they knew they had their master coming after them,
[01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:39.000]  that there wasn't anybody in line all the way up to the attorney general of the state of Texas
[01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:42.000]  that could do anything with me.
[01:47:42.000 --> 01:47:45.000]  I crawled right down their throats.
[01:47:45.000 --> 01:47:51.000]  I have filed criminal charges against the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court.
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:56.000]  I got all the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals put before a grand jury
[01:47:56.000 --> 01:48:01.000]  and only got that done because I'm nobody.
[01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:02.000]  You can do that.
[01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  If you want to get them to go after this notary, you've got to give them a political reason.
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:19.000]  And you take this police officer and you kick his boss's boss's boss.
[01:48:19.000 --> 01:48:22.000]  Irwin, you ever been in the military?
[01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:24.000]  No.
[01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:30.000]  Okay, well in the military, poop grows downhill.
[01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  And the further it grows, the bigger it gets.
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:42.000]  If you're the one that got this mess started, they don't care if you were right, wrong, or what have you.
[01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:44.000]  They just do not care.
[01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:48.000]  You caused this problem, fix it.
[01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:51.000]  Does that make sense?
[01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:52.000]  Yes.
[01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:57.000]  I see a bit of that philosophy in some of the videos I was much enough to see of yours,
[01:48:57.000 --> 01:48:59.000]  but I didn't see many of them.
[01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:02.000]  Well, the second question I have, if I may, has to do with you.
[01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:06.000]  In another video, you mentioned going in a foreculture situation
[01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:10.000]  instead of going down the rabbit holes of MERS and this and that,
[01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  going for the breach of contract.
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  And I was wondering if that's still viable when the broadcast came.
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  And also, you mentioned TILA and some other organizations.
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:24.000]  Hope, okay.
[01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  HOPITI, the RESPA.
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  Yeah, well, since then, I think that was the one I saw, maybe 2012.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:36.000]  I assume you're aware of, obviously, for stories with TILA,
[01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:41.000]  the Jasenowski decision by the Supreme Court a few years ago, I think in January 2015.
[01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  Oh, am I ever aware of Jasenowski?
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  I couldn't believe that Wells Fargo let this thing get to the Supreme.
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:56.000]  What were they thinking?
[01:49:56.000 --> 01:50:01.000]  Okay, Jasenowski, this couple gets a loan,
[01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:07.000]  and then three years after they get the loan, they file a notice of rescission.
[01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:10.000]  And what they claimed was,
[01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  they didn't claim that you didn't give us notice that we could rescind.
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:17.000]  You had to take the lawsuit.
[01:50:17.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  They claimed that you only gave us one, and there were two of us sitting here.
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:26.000]  You were supposed to give us two.
[01:50:26.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  And they filed it on the absolute last day.
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:37.000]  That was about as nitpicking a complaint as I could imagine.
[01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  They didn't say you didn't give us notice,
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:43.000]  but you were supposed to give a paper to both of us.
[01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:46.000]  And they let this get all the way to the Supreme,
[01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:52.000]  and the Supreme just mopped the floor with the banks.
[01:50:52.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  I have two quiet title actions in court right now.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  Here's what we did.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:04.000]  I got this qualified written request.
[01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:10.000]  Now, a qualified written request is a document that claims an accounting error
[01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:14.000]  and requests that the servicer correct the error.
[01:51:14.000 --> 01:51:17.000]  So I just take all of the amounts on the HUD-1 settlement statement and say,
[01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:24.000]  guys, at closing, you didn't provide documentation to show that these fees were valid,
[01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:26.000]  so therefore they're all fraudulent.
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:28.000]  Prove them up.
[01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  And I claimed that these were fraudulently charged,
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:37.000]  and therefore you're charging too much on the payment demand.
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:39.000]  You need to correct the accounting error.
[01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  That makes it a qualified written request.
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:44.000]  And then I dispute the entire debt.
[01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:47.000]  And then I do 20 pages of trash.
[01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  I got 20 pages of discovery.
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:52.000]  And if you look on the Internet,
[01:51:52.000 --> 01:51:54.000]  you find these qualified written request documents.
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  All they are is discovery.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:51:58.000]  It's not a qualified written request,
[01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:01.000]  and the lender doesn't have to respond to any of that.
[01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:04.000]  But I put it in there anyway.
[01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:10.000]  And the reason I put it in there is the very last paragraph says,
[01:52:10.000 --> 01:52:18.000]  if you fail to adequately respond to this inquiry within the time allotted,
[01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:25.000]  you may consider this document as a notice of recension.
[01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:27.000]  They never read it.
[01:52:27.000 --> 01:52:30.000]  They get to all of that garbage discovery and say,
[01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:36.000]  ah, this is trash, this is trash, and they don't read the last paragraph.
[01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:39.000]  So they got 20 days.
[01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  And what I'm claiming is the statute says you have three years to rescind.
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:54.000]  After that, you're barred by statute of limitations unless you're in foreclosure.
[01:52:54.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  And once foreclosure begins,
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:53:01.000]  if you can show more than $35 of unnoticed charges,
[01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:05.000]  you're right to rescind renews.
[01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:12.000]  We had a judge just last week render a ruling that our recension was invalid
[01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:16.000]  because we didn't rescind within the three years.
[01:53:16.000 --> 01:53:19.000]  The right to rescind doesn't last forever.
[01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:23.000]  And I wrote a response that said, yes, it does.
[01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:31.000]  Once foreclosure is initiated and you can show more than $35 of undisclosed charges,
[01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  the right to rescind is reinvigorated and there is no statute of limitations.
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:39.000]  So it does last forever.
[01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  But on the first three years, if you file after three years,
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:54.000]  the statute of limitations that the argument we're making is not a bar to file it.
[01:53:54.000 --> 01:53:57.000]  It's an affirmative defense.
[01:53:57.000 --> 01:54:05.000]  And when you give notice of rescind, they've got 20 days in which time to bring that defense.
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:10.000]  File an action with the district court in opposition to the rescind.
[01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  Jasniewski says that the Truth in Lending Statement,
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:18.000]  the Truth in Lending Act establishes you've got 20 days.
[01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:27.000]  If you don't begin the recension process or file an opposition in the district court,
[01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:32.000]  the borrower may retain the property with no further obligation.
[01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:39.000]  So we're saying that while you had an affirmative defense, you had to bring it.
[01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:48.000]  Since you didn't bring it within the 20-day time limit, you waived it.
[01:54:48.000 --> 01:54:50.000]  Oh, we're having great fun with this.
[01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:54.000]  Supposedly they're supposed to give back the campus of note and all the money
[01:54:54.000 --> 01:54:57.000]  and even the closing course you give like that will ever happen,
[01:54:57.000 --> 01:54:59.000]  as well as reconvening the property.
[01:54:59.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  But we have one in our state and we got the three-day limit by four days in March of a year ago.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:15.000]  We got arguably the worst federal judge in the country, Judge Robert Jones in Nevada.
[01:55:15.000 --> 01:55:20.000]  He's been overturned by the Ninth Circuit like two or three times in the last year and a half,
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:25.000]  and just last month in March he was taken off a case with one of those grazing things with the ranchers.
[01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:30.000]  Anyway, he's turned down everything and we're appealing to the Ninth Circuit,
[01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:33.000]  but just to show you how bad a judge he is,
[01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  the situation when he used to be the head judge in Nevada,
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  and he asked the head judges for all 50 states to sign something regarding sequestration,
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  49 judges voted yes.
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:48.000]  He was the only one who said no.
[01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:52.000]  And he's just crazy.
[01:55:52.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  So hopefully the Ninth...
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:56.000]  Okay, hold on.
[01:55:56.000 --> 01:56:04.000]  Everything's political and all politics is local.
[01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:10.000]  You will never win your case simply because you have the law and the facts on your side.
[01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:15.000]  You'll win your case if you have the politics on your side.
[01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:19.000]  And it sounds like this judge is very political.
[01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:21.000]  You should grieve him.
[01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  You should file a judicial conduct complaint against him.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:29.000]  Here's why, Randy, because he was appointed by Senior Bush and he just turned 65.
[01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:33.000]  As of February 2nd, they said, he is going down...
[01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:37.000]  He's getting rid of 65% of his workload, but he still gets full pay.
[01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:39.000]  Nice work if you can get it.
[01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  However, he's keeping the cases that he has because once you get to be 65,
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:47.000]  which he's like 67 and worked 15 years, then retirement is looming.
[01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:49.000]  So he's been appointed for life.
[01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:55.000]  And he obviously doesn't mind being reversed, like they said.
[01:56:55.000 --> 01:56:59.000]  He's been reversed at least two or three times and represented.
[01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:01.000]  Okay, listen.
[01:57:01.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  The only way we know of getting rid of a judge is getting his bond rating so high they can't afford it.
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:13.000]  And the way you do that is you file judicial conduct complaints against him.
[01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:19.000]  And if he's a federal judge, that's like a lawsuit you file with the Court of Appeals.
[01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  That is very, very political.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:26.000]  It gets everybody looking at the judge.
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:30.000]  They hate judicial conduct complaints.
[01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  What kind of...
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  I'm sorry, I'm hard of hearing.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:34.000]  What kind of complaint is that?
[01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:37.000]  Judicial conduct.
[01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:39.000]  Oh, judicial conduct.
[01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:42.000]  Yes, ding him good.
[01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:49.000]  And if he says one word about you filing a judicial conduct complaint against him,
[01:57:49.000 --> 01:57:53.000]  you charge him with witness tampering.
[01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:55.000]  That's true.
[01:57:55.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  I'm working on a 89-year-old judge we've got here in Fort Worth that we really need off the bench.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  And I'm working on him.
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:12.000]  Okay, if you have more for us, Irvin, call us back tomorrow night.
[01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  We do a four-hour show, but tonight we are out of time.
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  Perfect.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:19.000]  Charles, I'm sorry I didn't get to you.
[01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  Give us a call tomorrow night.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  We'll get to you tomorrow.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens from Wheel of Law Radio.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:29.000]  Our call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  We also will have a listen line on Logos Radio Network.
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  You can go there and listen to us live.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  We'll be back tomorrow night with our four-hour info marathon, so give us a listen.
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:45.000]  If you've got any questions or comments, give us a call.
[01:58:45.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Thank you for listening, and good night.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:05.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:05.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  teaching you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:12.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:12.000 --> 01:59:21.000]  Call us toll-free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:28.000]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps,
[01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:31.000]  and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:31.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:52.000]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:52.000 --> 02:00:03.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.