[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000] The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily [00:06.000 --> 00:13.000] bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop [00:13.000 --> 00:21.000] into the tides of the alternative. [00:21.000 --> 00:28.000] Markets for Friday, March 25, 2016, are currently treading with gold at $1,216.54 an ounce, [00:28.000 --> 00:35.000] silver at $15.16 an ounce, Texas crude, $39.46 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting [00:35.000 --> 00:44.000] in about $415 U.S. currency. [00:44.000 --> 00:49.000] Today in history, the year 31 CE, the first paschal or feast of first fruits, known today [00:49.000 --> 00:55.000] as Easter because of Romanization, took place according to the calendar maker Dionysus Exegus, [00:55.000 --> 01:00.000] best known as the inventor of Anno Domini, the designation for the era after Christ, [01:00.000 --> 01:05.000] the feast of first fruits, third day after Passover, when Jesus Christ resurrected from [01:05.000 --> 01:10.000] the dead, today in history. [01:10.000 --> 01:16.000] In recent years, in a ritual performed before world media at the Castle Nuevo de Porto Refugee [01:16.000 --> 01:22.000] Center near Rome, men and women refugees from Mali, Eritrea, Syria, and Pakistan who were [01:22.000 --> 01:27.000] Muslim, Hindu, Catholic, and Coptic Christians had their feet washed by Pope Francis on the [01:27.000 --> 01:29.000] Catholic Holy Thursday this week. [01:29.000 --> 01:34.000] Francis said during his homily that all of us together, Muslims, Hindus, Catholics, Copts, [01:34.000 --> 01:39.000] Evangelical brothers and sisters, children of the same God, we want to live in peace, [01:39.000 --> 01:40.000] integrated. [01:40.000 --> 01:45.000] You, we, all of us together of different religions, different cultures, with children of the same [01:45.000 --> 01:46.000] father, brother. [01:46.000 --> 01:51.000] Today at this time, when I do the same act of Jesus washing the feet of the 12 of you, [01:51.000 --> 01:56.000] let us all make a gesture of brotherhood and let us all say we are different, we are different, [01:56.000 --> 02:06.000] we have different cultures and religions, but we are brothers and we want to live in peace. [02:06.000 --> 02:10.000] The first fully autonomous, federally approved urban drone delivery unit in the United States [02:10.000 --> 02:14.000] delivered its first package to a residential location in a small town in Nevada. [02:14.000 --> 02:19.000] Florida CEO Matt Sweeney announced today their six-rotor drone flew itself about one-half [02:19.000 --> 02:24.000] mile and lowered the package outside a vacant resident in Hawthorne, about 140 miles southeast [02:24.000 --> 02:25.000] of Reno. [02:25.000 --> 02:30.000] The route was pre-programmed using GPS and while a pilot was on standby as a backup to [02:30.000 --> 02:33.000] the autonomous system, they weren't needed during the March 10th delivery. [02:33.000 --> 02:38.000] Florida conducted the first FAA approved drone delivery last July for a series of medical [02:38.000 --> 02:41.000] deliveries to a rural healthcare clinic in Virginia. [02:41.000 --> 02:45.000] Florida says that the Nevada delivery shows drones can safely navigate around buildings [02:45.000 --> 02:49.000] and deliver packages within a populated urban area. [02:49.000 --> 03:16.000] This is Luke Brody with your Lowdown for March 25th, 2016. [03:16.000 --> 03:23.000] For more information visit www.lowdown.gov. [03:46.000 --> 03:57.000] For more information visit www.lowdown.gov. [04:16.000 --> 04:32.000] Alright folks, good evening. [04:32.000 --> 04:37.000] This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig and my special [04:37.000 --> 04:39.000] guest tonight, Randy Kelton. [04:39.000 --> 04:45.000] We have an issue I want to talk about tonight and that issue is whether or not municipal [04:45.000 --> 04:53.000] judges are acting judicially when they're handling cases that involve ordinances. [04:53.000 --> 04:57.000] Now I gave Randy some required reading for this discussion tonight and I don't know how [04:57.000 --> 04:58.000] far he got through it. [04:58.000 --> 05:02.000] I guess we'll find out as he tries to haggle with me over these premises I've got going [05:02.000 --> 05:04.000] on here in my head. [05:04.000 --> 05:10.000] But let's consider the basic background of what an ordinance is and what it isn't. [05:10.000 --> 05:16.000] An ordinance is created by the municipality or the county, okay? [05:16.000 --> 05:19.000] It's not created by the legislature. [05:19.000 --> 05:26.000] For that reason alone it is not binding public law because under Article 3, Section 1 of [05:26.000 --> 05:33.000] the Texas Constitution, the legislative power is invested solely in the two houses of the [05:33.000 --> 05:35.000] Texas legislature. [05:35.000 --> 05:41.000] At no point in time whatsoever did we ever delegate any law making power to counties [05:41.000 --> 05:43.000] or municipalities. [05:43.000 --> 05:50.000] Now we know that counties and municipalities attempt to use their ordinances as if they [05:50.000 --> 05:52.000] are public law. [05:52.000 --> 05:57.000] But that would be a violation of the Texas Constitution, both the Bill of Rights and [05:57.000 --> 06:00.000] the separation of powers. [06:00.000 --> 06:05.000] Counties and municipalities are only acting governmentally when they are directly acting [06:05.000 --> 06:10.000] as agents of the state under state law and authority. [06:10.000 --> 06:16.000] Ordinances do not qualify as state law and state law authority. [06:16.000 --> 06:18.000] They just don't. [06:18.000 --> 06:21.000] So when you go in, go ahead, Randy. [06:21.000 --> 06:26.000] Let me distinguish, let me make sure I've got this right in my head. [06:26.000 --> 06:36.000] The legislature has authorized municipal judges in certain instances to enforce state law. [06:36.000 --> 06:39.000] To preside over cases involving state law. [06:39.000 --> 06:41.000] Class D fine only. [06:41.000 --> 06:51.000] But only in those instances are they authorized to act as judges concerning the general public. [06:51.000 --> 06:57.000] Otherwise they're essentially an administrator for a corporate rule. [06:57.000 --> 06:58.000] Correct. [06:58.000 --> 07:03.000] And here is where our problems begin with that separation. [07:03.000 --> 07:10.000] Because consider what the Code of Criminal Procedure requires for a complaint. [07:10.000 --> 07:16.000] The Code of Criminal Procedure specifically requires that a complaint make the allegation [07:16.000 --> 07:21.000] that there is a violation of a law of this state. [07:21.000 --> 07:24.000] Now, this is where we run into a problem. [07:24.000 --> 07:30.000] Because the way the definition of this state and of law is in the various codes, the term [07:30.000 --> 07:41.000] law is defined to encompass ordinances, agency regulations, school board policies and procedures. [07:41.000 --> 07:46.000] Those are all incorporated in the definition of the term law. [07:46.000 --> 07:55.000] Which by itself cannot be the same definition that is applicable to law under the Texas Constitution. [07:55.000 --> 08:03.000] Because that would be the legislature attempting to delegate legislative power which was delegated [08:03.000 --> 08:11.000] solely to them and which the courts have ruled they cannot re-delegate a delegated power. [08:11.000 --> 08:20.000] So the complaint does not in and of itself state a violation of a law of this state unless [08:20.000 --> 08:26.000] we're dealing only with the definition of law and not an actual law. [08:26.000 --> 08:33.000] Which then calls into question the adjudication of any case in a municipal court where the allegation [08:33.000 --> 08:36.000] is that you violated some law. [08:36.000 --> 08:42.000] Well, Judge, are we talking about an actual state law or are we talking about the definition [08:42.000 --> 08:46.000] of the term law as to what I allegedly violated? [08:46.000 --> 08:52.000] Because the two are not equal, they cannot be equal. [08:52.000 --> 08:58.000] This would explain why these municipal and JP courts tell you that the Constitution doesn't [08:58.000 --> 09:04.000] apply in these cases in their court. [09:04.000 --> 09:06.000] So what do you think about this mess so far? [09:06.000 --> 09:09.000] Because it is a mess. [09:09.000 --> 09:15.000] It is a mess and it's mostly a mess of definitions and understanding rules. [09:15.000 --> 09:24.000] And they went to a lot of trouble to create what I call complex equivalence where you [09:24.000 --> 09:31.000] have a term that in one case has one meaning but in another context has another meaning [09:31.000 --> 09:38.000] and they use those terms interchangeably so we think we're talking about the same things [09:38.000 --> 09:47.000] by using these same terms but if we're not aware, very acutely aware of the context, [09:47.000 --> 09:54.000] the complex equivalent that is implied by the term we wind up not knowing what the heck [09:54.000 --> 09:56.000] is going on. [09:56.000 --> 09:57.000] Exactly. [09:57.000 --> 10:03.000] Which that gets us into the situation of we're being hauled into a court of unknown jurisdiction. [10:03.000 --> 10:11.000] Hence the reason why they, in my opinion, they come up with this term quasi-jurisdiction [10:11.000 --> 10:17.000] which of course is a non-sequitur because nowhere is such a jurisdiction defined by [10:17.000 --> 10:18.000] law. [10:18.000 --> 10:24.000] There's no such thing as quasi-anything defined by any law anywhere. [10:24.000 --> 10:30.000] And since they're only given jurisdiction in very specific areas which is civil, [10:30.000 --> 10:39.000] administrative, and criminal and none of those are qualified as quasi, then the argument [10:39.000 --> 10:48.000] is they have no jurisdiction at all. [10:48.000 --> 10:50.000] What do you think about that? [10:50.000 --> 11:00.000] Okay, so I have to keep going. [11:00.000 --> 11:07.000] Judges, they have real jurisdiction in criminal cases and they have administrative jurisdiction [11:07.000 --> 11:16.000] when they're administering the rules of the corporation, the municipal corporation. [11:16.000 --> 11:18.000] Correct. [11:18.000 --> 11:26.000] And where does a municipal judge have civil jurisdiction? [11:26.000 --> 11:32.000] In the case of Texas, the only place they have civil is in relation to the suits required [11:32.000 --> 11:37.000] to be filed to collect the red light camera civil fine. [11:37.000 --> 11:43.000] The civil fine specifically requires that they file a civil lawsuit in order to get [11:43.000 --> 11:46.000] that $75, but they don't. [11:46.000 --> 11:54.000] They send out fraudulent citations not authorized by law to trick people into paying them. [11:54.000 --> 11:56.000] And then they adjudicate them. [11:56.000 --> 12:00.000] This is something else I found out that is an argument in this. [12:00.000 --> 12:06.000] Nowhere in law that I can find in Texas is a police officer authorized to administer [12:06.000 --> 12:08.000] oaths. [12:08.000 --> 12:12.000] They're not authorized to do that by law anywhere that I can find it. [12:12.000 --> 12:15.000] Okay, we're using the term police officer. [12:15.000 --> 12:22.000] Well, in this case, that's because police officers are who the municipality has to do [12:22.000 --> 12:27.000] the initial hearing on a red light camera ticket, for instance. [12:27.000 --> 12:31.000] They always choose some officer in the police department. [12:31.000 --> 12:37.000] Okay, I'm making a distinction between peace officer and police officer. [12:37.000 --> 12:38.000] Correct. [12:38.000 --> 12:44.000] But in the statute under the transportation code, if it were valid, but in the statute [12:44.000 --> 12:50.000] dealing with red light cameras, they are specifically required by statute to appoint a [12:50.000 --> 12:55.000] hearing officer who is authorized to administer oaths under state law. [12:55.000 --> 13:02.000] That does not include a police officer. [13:02.000 --> 13:08.000] So how can a police officer be the initial hearing officer that finds a finding of [13:08.000 --> 13:13.000] liability when he's not authorized by the statute to administer an oath in order to [13:13.000 --> 13:15.000] be the hearing officer? [13:15.000 --> 13:19.000] And see, this again goes to the acting judicially part. [13:19.000 --> 13:30.000] Okay, can a police officer be engaged in the capacity of a hearing officer? [13:30.000 --> 13:36.000] And if so, would the hearing officer necessarily have that power? [13:36.000 --> 13:39.000] Well, that's the issue. [13:39.000 --> 13:41.000] The issue here is... [13:41.000 --> 13:42.000] Okay, let me back up one step. [13:42.000 --> 13:50.000] Is there anything that says that a hearing officer has the power to administer oaths? [13:50.000 --> 13:51.000] No, no. [13:51.000 --> 13:57.000] Or only someone who has the power already can be a hearing officer? [13:57.000 --> 14:01.000] Someone who is authorized by law to administer oaths. [14:01.000 --> 14:08.000] There's nothing in the statute that authorizes that police officer to administer an oath. [14:08.000 --> 14:14.000] There's nothing in the definition of peace officer that authorizes them to administer an oath. [14:14.000 --> 14:23.000] So no matter which capacity he's attempting to act under, he has no lawful authority to administer an oath. [14:23.000 --> 14:31.000] Okay, let's move past this red camera thing so we get onto the real meat. [14:31.000 --> 14:35.000] Yeah, but it all goes into the same ball of wax. [14:35.000 --> 14:40.000] Because here you get into the issue of this is supposedly a state law, [14:40.000 --> 14:50.000] but now you've got an illegal hearing officer sending you on an unconstitutional appeal to a municipal judge, [14:50.000 --> 14:54.000] and they both work for the same municipality or the same county. [14:54.000 --> 14:56.000] You see the problem here? [14:56.000 --> 15:02.000] Yeah, that's kind of like going from a county judge to a district. [15:02.000 --> 15:05.000] From a commissioner's court to a JP. [15:05.000 --> 15:13.000] Well, in criminal, you can't go from a county to a district. [15:13.000 --> 15:16.000] You have to go from either one to a court of appeals. [15:16.000 --> 15:22.000] So here we have a municipal court being treated like a court of appeals. [15:22.000 --> 15:29.000] Correct, and they're given administrative appellate jurisdiction in the statute dealing with those cameras. [15:29.000 --> 15:33.000] But that, once again, since it says administrative, they're not acting judicially. [15:33.000 --> 15:36.000] We know they're not in a red light camera ticket. [15:36.000 --> 15:42.000] But these tickets are issued via a city ordinance. [15:42.000 --> 15:49.000] And think of all the other code enforcement stuff and everything else they use against the public as if it's law when it isn't. [15:49.000 --> 15:52.000] And then they haul you into that same administrative court. [15:52.000 --> 16:02.000] Hold on, that traffic signal, does that belong to the city? [16:02.000 --> 16:04.000] No, the signal here is not the issue. [16:04.000 --> 16:08.000] The camera program at that light is the issue. [16:08.000 --> 16:11.000] The camera is owned by the municipality, not the state. [16:11.000 --> 16:17.000] It's administered by the municipality as far as the contract between them and the camera provider. [16:17.000 --> 16:28.000] And they must create an ordinance to authorize the camera activity and to authorize the contracting with the red light camera company. [16:28.000 --> 16:35.000] What I'm wondering is how we get from the transportation code to municipal ordinance. [16:35.000 --> 16:44.000] Because that's what the transportation code requires a municipality to establish before they can establish a camera program. [16:44.000 --> 16:48.000] Okay, I'm not up to speed enough on that part to tell. [16:48.000 --> 16:52.000] But it's all leading us into the same issue on the judicial side of things. [16:52.000 --> 16:54.000] And that's what I really want to get into when we get back. [16:54.000 --> 17:01.000] So if you'll hang on, folks, we'll be right back after this break. [17:01.000 --> 17:06.000] Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network? [17:06.000 --> 17:11.000] On top of the on-air talents, producers, and other hardworking individuals working behind the scenes, [17:11.000 --> 17:15.000] Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you. [17:15.000 --> 17:20.000] And we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year in our annual fundraisers, [17:20.000 --> 17:23.000] which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air. [17:23.000 --> 17:27.000] Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution. [17:27.000 --> 17:32.000] Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks. [17:32.000 --> 17:35.000] First prize being a Spikes Skull Lower Receiver. [17:35.000 --> 17:37.000] Second prize being a Taurus Curve. [17:37.000 --> 17:39.000] Ten winners will receive gift cards from All About Paper. [17:39.000 --> 17:45.000] And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud. [17:45.000 --> 17:50.000] Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin. [17:50.000 --> 17:54.000] The Logos Radio Network fundraiser now through March 17th. [17:54.000 --> 18:00.000] Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air. [18:00.000 --> 18:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [18:05.000 --> 18:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [18:09.000 --> 18:14.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two. [18:14.000 --> 18:20.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, [18:20.000 --> 18:26.000] what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, [18:26.000 --> 18:33.000] how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:33.000 --> 18:38.000] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:38.000 --> 18:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:41.000 --> 18:49.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [18:49.000 --> 19:00.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [19:00.000 --> 19:11.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:11.000 --> 19:32.000] Look what we got, we ask the question, I wonder what I don't have the answer. [19:32.000 --> 19:44.000] Look what we got, we ask the question, look what we got, I wonder what I don't have the answer. [19:44.000 --> 19:49.000] I can't wait to see, Lord, how the war will end if it's easy. [19:49.000 --> 19:54.000] I can't wait to politically end them getting mad and angry. [19:54.000 --> 19:59.000] Let them not stand up and fight and fight for their freedom and be free. [19:59.000 --> 20:04.000] Let them love slavery and get handbook from the government again. [20:04.000 --> 20:14.000] Look what we got, we ask the question, I wonder what I don't have the answer. [20:14.000 --> 20:17.000] Look what we got, we ask the question. [20:17.000 --> 20:19.000] All right, folks, we are back. [20:19.000 --> 20:25.000] This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig, and my special guest tonight, Randy Kelton. [20:25.000 --> 20:29.000] All right, Randy, what were you trying to get to here before the break interrupted us? [20:29.000 --> 20:41.000] Okay, I want to kind of, I've been spending most of this evening trying to map out all of these arguments in a logical sequence. [20:41.000 --> 20:57.000] Now, we have a municipal corporation here who the legislature, for apparently administrative convenience, have delegated a certain amount of judicial authority. [20:57.000 --> 21:01.000] And the Constitution authorizes them to create courts as they need. [21:01.000 --> 21:03.000] Okay. [21:03.000 --> 21:07.000] And then they authorize them to write city ordinances. [21:07.000 --> 21:16.000] Yes, but nowhere in the Constitution is an ordinance ever referred to as a public law or a law of any kind. [21:16.000 --> 21:27.000] And the provision under Article 11, Section 5 says very clearly that no power can be established in a municipal charter that would violate the Texas Constitution. [21:27.000 --> 21:30.000] So that would include lawmaking power. [21:30.000 --> 21:38.000] But they did authorize municipal courts to enforce certain state laws. [21:38.000 --> 21:42.000] Yes, anything under Class C, fine-only jurisdiction. [21:42.000 --> 21:44.000] Okay. [21:44.000 --> 21:45.000] That's where we're at. [21:45.000 --> 21:53.000] Now, I'm going to try to map this out so I can keep all this in context. [21:53.000 --> 22:03.000] Okay. From there, what's the issue with a municipal court enforcing the transportation code? [22:03.000 --> 22:09.000] There's no specific issue with them enforcing the transportation code properly. [22:09.000 --> 22:16.000] But the issue here, as far as them acting judicially, is what the real problem is. [22:16.000 --> 22:24.000] Wait a minute. Here, in reading the codes, I have an issue here. [22:24.000 --> 22:34.000] I just read on the area this child and subject matter jurisdiction I put together for Scott on Addison, Texas. [22:34.000 --> 22:48.000] And the way I read the code, the sheriff can appoint five officers in the county to be certified to enforce the transportation code. [22:48.000 --> 23:03.000] Those officers can be municipal officers so long as the municipality meets certain very specific, strict requirements. [23:03.000 --> 23:06.000] Addison, Texas did not meet those. [23:06.000 --> 23:25.000] It looks like these specific requirements for who can have a police officer or a peace officer authorized to act in the capacity of a police officer is extremely limited. [23:25.000 --> 23:41.000] So most of these cities I've looked at, they could possibly enforce a traffic code if they had someone who could actually write a citation for one. [23:41.000 --> 24:00.000] But as I understand, if a county police officer writes a citation, then that citation will be handled by the local justice of the peace, not the municipality. [24:00.000 --> 24:07.000] So how do we get police officers in municipalities? [24:07.000 --> 24:12.000] Well, again, the only way to do that would be through the provisions of the administrative code. [24:12.000 --> 24:22.000] But they also have authorized it through some changes in the code of criminal procedure under Chapter 14, for instance. [24:22.000 --> 24:26.000] But here, again, still is where we run into a problem. [24:26.000 --> 24:31.000] Wait a minute. Chapter 14 doesn't go to transportation code. [24:31.000 --> 24:41.000] Chapter 14 talks about how an officer may issue a citation in lieu of making an arrest without a warrant. [24:41.000 --> 24:50.000] It specifically talks about citations relating to the transportation code in Chapter 14. [24:50.000 --> 24:53.000] That's interesting. I don't remember that. [24:53.000 --> 25:06.000] Okay. But my point here, again, this is not to do with the transportation code per se. The only reason I brought up the transportation code is the red light camera issue where they must create an ordinance in order to implement it. [25:06.000 --> 25:19.000] But it leads into the issue of them using ordinances of any kind against the public as law and then trying them in a municipal court as if they're acting judicially. [25:19.000 --> 25:24.000] Because the problem becomes this when they attempt to act judicially. [25:24.000 --> 25:27.000] The code of criminal procedure, they don't follow. [25:27.000 --> 25:31.000] We know this. They will admit that they only have to follow parts of it. [25:31.000 --> 25:39.000] They will admit that United States Supreme Court and Texas Supreme Court rulings have no authority over that court. [25:39.000 --> 25:42.000] Now, I don't know how they get there, but they say it. [25:42.000 --> 25:54.000] But the problem here comes in in that when they aren't required to play by the rules that we have to follow, and we're not told what rules they are playing by, this becomes a very one-sided game. [25:54.000 --> 25:58.000] Because we don't know which ones are required to follow and which ones they don't. [25:58.000 --> 26:02.000] But one of the things they do is file a criminal complaint. [26:02.000 --> 26:11.000] But the requirements of that criminal complaint must be a violation of a state law that's stated in the complaint. [26:11.000 --> 26:31.000] If an ordinance is not a state law by constitutional prohibition, then the complaint cannot be proper in the case of an ordinance allegation because there's no state law violation involved. [26:31.000 --> 26:50.000] So how then can the court be acting judicially and issue and use a criminal complaint to gain jurisdiction when a criminal complaint is specifically limited to violations of state law? [26:50.000 --> 26:55.000] Okay, I'm taking it. Are you still referring to the red light camera? [26:55.000 --> 27:03.000] No, any ordinance, whether it be code enforcement, the dog catcher, you name it, ordinances. [27:03.000 --> 27:06.000] Okay, so we're not talking specifically transportation? [27:06.000 --> 27:13.000] No, no. We're talking any ordinance and these people acting as if they're acting judicially. [27:13.000 --> 27:16.000] And the reason this premise came to mind was this. [27:16.000 --> 27:26.000] We have these courts all over Texas, especially the municipal courts, that refuse to follow the rules of procedure, any rules of procedure that doesn't suit them. [27:26.000 --> 27:28.000] How do we hold them accountable? [27:28.000 --> 27:38.000] Well, the only way we're going to be able to hold them accountable is to sue them, which we can't do if they're defined as acting judicially, right? [27:38.000 --> 27:41.000] They have immunity if they're acting judicially. [27:41.000 --> 27:55.000] But if they're not, we can sue the living dog crap out of them and take their house. [27:55.000 --> 28:18.000] Okay, anytime we can get it, I have a situation now where I think a judge gave a grand jury legal advice and if I can get the foreman to feed me the judge, then I get to sue the judge because he's not acting judicially when he's giving advice to a grand jury. [28:18.000 --> 28:33.000] Okay, so I'm trying to figure out what the context of what we're addressing here is. We're specifically addressing municipal courts enforcing city ordinances as if they were state law. [28:33.000 --> 28:49.000] Correct. Okay. And then forging criminal complaints to make it appear as if it's an actual law and that they're actually acting in a state of the authorized capacity when they're not. [28:49.000 --> 29:12.000] Because remember, if the state only gave them governmental authority in relation to Class C fine onlys, okay, as public law, then they are falsifying government documents when they file a criminal complaint alleging an ordinance violation, even if the legislature authorized it. [29:12.000 --> 29:24.000] Because the legislature can't authorize an ordinance to be treated as if it was enacted by them. [29:24.000 --> 29:33.000] Okay, so we how specifically do we address that challenge subject matter jurisdiction. [29:33.000 --> 29:42.000] Well, that's the issue. That's what I want to talk about. How do we address that? What can we use it to do? [29:42.000 --> 29:48.000] The way I see this, that goes directly to subject matter jurisdiction. [29:48.000 --> 30:01.000] But we need an after effect, a tsunami from after that. But let's talk about that when we get back. Y'all hang on folks. We'll be right back after the break. [30:01.000 --> 30:14.000] Are you having guilty thoughts? They could land you in jail. Neuro forensic brain scans are being used to prove guilt in India and they could be coming to a courtroom near you. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you more in just a moment. [30:14.000 --> 30:24.000] Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information. That's creepy. But it doesn't have to be that way. [30:24.000 --> 30:34.000] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and they're third party certified. [30:34.000 --> 30:44.000] If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. Great search results and total privacy. Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [30:44.000 --> 30:54.000] If you're charged with murder in India, you could confess without saying a word. Their courts use brainwave technology to read defendant's minds and place them at the scene of the crime. [30:54.000 --> 31:03.000] The accused is fitted with a wired cap hooked to an EEG machine. Investigators then read statements about the crime and document the defendant's brain response. [31:03.000 --> 31:14.000] They claim the system is foolproof since it measures electrical activity sparked by knowledge in the brain. While the U.S. does not yet allow brainwave evidence, experts predict it's just a matter of time. [31:14.000 --> 31:20.000] Defense attorneys are petitioning for its use in American courts to exonerate convicted criminals. [31:20.000 --> 31:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.000 --> 31:37.000] What are you thinking? Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month. [31:37.000 --> 31:48.000] FUSA.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach and colon and feel better than ever. [31:48.000 --> 31:57.000] It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products, that saves you space, time and money. Call 888-910-4367. [31:57.000 --> 32:01.000] Only at FUSA.org. [32:01.000 --> 32:12.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:12.000 --> 32:19.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right to due process of law. [32:19.000 --> 32:35.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law. [32:35.000 --> 32:40.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:40.000 --> 32:50.000] By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. [32:50.000 --> 33:01.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:01.000 --> 33:11.000] Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:31.000 --> 33:59.000] All right folks, we are back. [33:59.000 --> 34:13.000] This is Rule of Law Radio with your host Eddie Craig and my guest tonight Randy Kelton and we are talking about whether or not municipal and justice court judges act judicially when they're dealing with ordinances. [34:13.000 --> 34:16.000] Randy, you were having some extra thoughts about this. [34:16.000 --> 34:36.000] Yeah, I was thinking about, you know, you said how do we go after them? I'm thinking we go after them on a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction, but they're immediately going to come back and say, well, we statutorily have jurisdiction over Class C misdemeanors. [34:36.000 --> 34:55.000] And we're going to say, yes, you generally have subject matter jurisdiction, but in this instance, you are not judicially competent to address a city ordinance in a judicial capacity. [34:55.000 --> 35:06.000] That is an aspect of subject matter jurisdiction that whenever you file subject matter jurisdiction, you need to understand the courts going to say, well, I've got jurisdiction over this subject matter. [35:06.000 --> 35:10.000] Yeah, you do. But in this case, you don't have confidence. [35:10.000 --> 35:16.000] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Let me back you up here for a second because I think we have a misunderstanding here. [35:16.000 --> 35:28.000] A Class C misdemeanor is not the subject matter. That's the class of offense over which they are given authority to adjudicate, but it is not the subject matter. [35:28.000 --> 35:31.000] No, no, that's what subject matter jurisdiction means. [35:31.000 --> 35:35.000] No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. No, it doesn't. No, it doesn't. [35:35.000 --> 35:50.000] The subject matter is what is classified in law as the subject to which the offense applies. If the subject has an offense defined within it that is a Class C, then they must prove two things. [35:50.000 --> 36:00.000] One, it's a Class C, and two, what the subject matter was that generated the Class C. And they're not proving the second one at all. [36:00.000 --> 36:06.000] They never proved the subject matter. They only proved the class of offense or asserted. [36:06.000 --> 36:16.000] You're using, you have a definition for subject matter that I'm not sure of what that definition is. [36:16.000 --> 36:22.000] Okay, the definition is the one established by the Constitution for the legislature to create law in the first place. [36:22.000 --> 36:30.000] Every bill must state the subject of which that bill relates in order to be a valid law. That's right in the Texas Constitution. [36:30.000 --> 36:40.000] Therefore, subject matter is what the legislature created by defining the caption of the bill and setting forth the statutes under it. [36:40.000 --> 36:46.000] Okay, that's the subject matter. In this case, if we were talking about it, it would be the transportation code. [36:46.000 --> 36:57.000] Transportation is the subject matter. That's what's defined in that code. Therefore, for any municipal court to have jurisdiction of any offense in that code, [36:57.000 --> 37:02.000] they must first prove the applicability of the code by proving transportation. [37:02.000 --> 37:12.000] Then and only then can they get to the class of offense beneath it to say, okay, it was transportation and it's a Class C. Therefore, I have jurisdiction. [37:12.000 --> 37:19.000] Okay, we're not in disagreement then. It's just a matter of how I'm stating this. [37:19.000 --> 37:30.000] The municipal court can have subject matter jurisdiction over certain state laws, certain crimes that are Class C misdemeanors. [37:30.000 --> 37:34.000] They can have general subject matter jurisdiction over that. [37:34.000 --> 37:48.000] But in this particular case, where their municipality may call a violation of an ordinance a Class C misdemeanor, [37:48.000 --> 37:58.000] they would not have legal competence as a municipal judge to address that judicially. [37:58.000 --> 38:11.000] Right, but it also leads to another caveat here, Randy, and that is the city commissioners or the city council creating something and defining it as a crime. [38:11.000 --> 38:21.000] Yeah, I'm trying to distinguish here. When you go after subject matter jurisdiction, this is one of the arguments the court and the other side makes. [38:21.000 --> 38:33.000] The court says, oh, I have subject matter jurisdiction over Class C misdemeanors. And we're going to say, yeah, you do, but you don't have legal competence to treat a city ordinance as if it was a Class C misdemeanor. [38:33.000 --> 38:37.000] Nor do you have legal authority to define it as such. [38:37.000 --> 38:52.000] Right, and so that gets to competence, where they have general subject matter jurisdiction over what they're calling this. What you're bringing in under your general subject matter jurisdiction doesn't apply. [38:52.000 --> 38:55.000] You don't have the legal competence to do that. [38:55.000 --> 39:03.000] And I bring this up because this is exactly an argument I ran into in one of my challenges to subject matter jurisdictions. [39:03.000 --> 39:08.000] Okay, enough being pedantic over that minor point. [39:08.000 --> 39:10.000] Yeah. [39:10.000 --> 39:17.000] So a judge can hear a state transportation code or other Class C misdemeanor. [39:17.000 --> 39:22.000] A municipal judge can in a judicial capacity. [39:22.000 --> 39:29.000] But anything else he adjudicates for the city, he does so in an administrative capacity. [39:29.000 --> 39:42.000] He would have a very important distinction because a judge has immunity when he acts in a judicial capacity, not when he acts in an administrative capacity. [39:42.000 --> 39:47.000] Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner. What kind of coupie doll would you like, the long hair or the short hair? [39:47.000 --> 39:56.000] That's exactly right. That is exactly my point, the lack of immunity when they're not acting judicially. [39:56.000 --> 40:05.000] So this would be a great thing to take on because it's been my experiences that judges really, really hate to be sued. [40:05.000 --> 40:14.000] Yeah, and the first thing they're going to try to do is to make the argument that they were acting judicially and therefore have absolute immunity and then they have official immunity. [40:14.000 --> 40:18.000] The problem is they don't have either of those. And let me explain what I mean by that. [40:18.000 --> 40:24.000] They wouldn't have judicial immunity because they wouldn't be acting judicially. They're not acting under a state law. [40:24.000 --> 40:31.000] They wouldn't have official immunity because they are not acting as an agent of the state in order to acquire official immunity. [40:31.000 --> 40:42.000] They're acting as an agent of the incorporated municipality in a nongovernmental function, but a local corporate function. [40:42.000 --> 40:54.000] So they would not be able to hide behind either classification of immunity. And judges don't get qualified immunity like cops do. [40:54.000 --> 41:03.000] Okay, explain the difference between qualified immunity and official immunity and derivatives. [41:03.000 --> 41:13.000] Official immunity is when they're acting in a governmental capacity and what they did was a requirement of the job in order to do the duties assigned. [41:13.000 --> 41:19.000] Run that by me again. I just blanked that out. [41:19.000 --> 41:31.000] Qualified immunity is if they had the belief that they were acting correctly under the law authorizing them to do the act, then they have qualified immunity. [41:31.000 --> 41:33.000] This is where police officers get it. [41:33.000 --> 41:43.000] Judges, however, couldn't make that claim because one, they're required to know the law in more detail than the cops are. [41:43.000 --> 41:49.000] The reason the cops have this idiotic judicially created qualified immunity is because they're idiots. [41:49.000 --> 42:00.000] They don't know the law. But because they were enforcing it in their capacity as a police officer or a peace officer, then they have to be given immunity to cover their butt. [42:00.000 --> 42:03.000] Wait a minute. The judge can't make that claim. [42:03.000 --> 42:10.000] Wait a minute. That goes, that's in conflict with the school's doctrine. [42:10.000 --> 42:15.000] Well, of course it is. But the Supreme Court's the one that gave it to them. [42:15.000 --> 42:17.000] The federal supreme or state? [42:17.000 --> 42:35.000] Federal. The federal supreme court's the one that made the decision that cops get qualified immunity. As long as they believe that they were acting properly under the information at hand and the laws relevant to the subject, then they're immune. [42:35.000 --> 42:58.000] Okay. Then, you know, we probably could do a show on that subject because it's not necessarily in conflict with screws where there is a case that appears to give them authority to act in a certain way. [42:58.000 --> 43:07.000] If they act in a way that's in variance with that case, then under the school's doctrine, they would still be liable. [43:07.000 --> 43:18.000] Like the two guys, the sheriff and two deputies who acted under their authority to arrest this guy after they had been drinking in a bar. [43:18.000 --> 43:22.000] And they beat him to death on the courthouse steps. [43:22.000 --> 43:39.000] And while they were acting within their legal capacity, beaten to death on the courthouse steps exceeded that legal capacity, so they stepped outside. [43:39.000 --> 43:40.000] Hang on. [43:40.000 --> 43:52.000] Yeah, we're going to take another break here and then we'll be back to get back into this. And I don't know how long we're going to go, so please be patient because this is going to take a little bit of mind-boggling to work out. [43:52.000 --> 44:00.000] So give us an opportunity and we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang on. [44:00.000 --> 44:15.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [44:15.000 --> 44:22.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [44:22.000 --> 44:34.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:34.000 --> 44:43.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:43.000 --> 44:52.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [44:52.000 --> 45:01.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [45:01.000 --> 45:13.000] Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas, [45:13.000 --> 45:19.000] buying brave new books and chase fame to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [45:23.000 --> 45:31.000] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [45:31.000 --> 45:44.000] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. [45:44.000 --> 46:02.000] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com. [46:14.000 --> 46:20.000] If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one? [46:20.000 --> 46:26.000] If you could not wage any battle for love, would your purpose have to die? [46:26.000 --> 46:32.000] Would you stand behind a soldier or warrior unclogged, scuffling the keys of peace? [46:32.000 --> 46:35.000] All they're taking is a misunderstanding. [46:35.000 --> 46:43.000] Somebody calls the police, watching the spot sky. [46:43.000 --> 46:47.000] Watching the spot sky. [46:47.000 --> 46:52.000] All right, folks, this is Monday Night Rule of Law. We are back again with our host, Randy Kelton. [46:52.000 --> 46:54.000] All right, Randy, let's continue this on here. [46:54.000 --> 47:08.000] Yeah, okay. On the break, I was thinking about, okay, I got this police officer who purports to act under a city ordinance as if it were a state law. [47:08.000 --> 47:13.000] And he's going to claim good faith, reliance on competent authority. [47:13.000 --> 47:27.000] I was thinking, how is he going to fit himself under qualified immunity when he acted in a way that wasn't within the scope of his actual authority? [47:27.000 --> 47:32.000] But all of these officers believe that what they're doing is within their authority. [47:32.000 --> 47:40.000] Like a police officer in Addison, Texas, is enforcing the traffic code. [47:40.000 --> 47:47.000] Now, he's been taught and trained that it's within his authority to enforce the traffic code. [47:47.000 --> 47:59.000] And we go look in the law and say, there's no way he can have authority to do that because the municipality that he's employed by can't have one. [47:59.000 --> 48:05.000] But he honestly truly believes that he could. So how is he going to make his claim? [48:05.000 --> 48:11.000] The only claim I can see is good faith, reliance on competent authority. [48:11.000 --> 48:24.000] And what I'm looking at is who can we get to? Who can we get the police officer to throw under the bus for us? [48:24.000 --> 48:35.000] Who told you that? Who is that competent authority on which you relied for this qualified immunity defense? [48:35.000 --> 48:50.000] And then whoever told him that, if that person happens to be in a position to give advice to police officers, then he doesn't have any immunity. [48:50.000 --> 48:54.000] Even if he's a judge, he doesn't have any immunity. [48:54.000 --> 49:09.000] I'm going to try to get the foreman of the Tarrant County grand jury to tell me who told him that he could not hear a complaint for a violation outside of Tarrant County. [49:09.000 --> 49:26.000] Somebody told him that, and I think it was a district judge. And when he tells me who told him that, whoever told him that did not do that within the scope of an official capacity. [49:26.000 --> 49:31.000] He did that as a lawyer, lawyer-client relationship. [49:31.000 --> 49:39.000] I had to do, I had a, I filed a complaint in the town at the event against my niece's ex-husband. [49:39.000 --> 49:42.000] Big blow up. I'm trying to get the guy out of control. [49:42.000 --> 49:46.000] The chief knew that this was a family issue. He didn't want to mess with it. [49:46.000 --> 49:50.000] So he didn't give the complaint to the magistrate. So I crawled down the chief's throat. [49:50.000 --> 49:53.000] And he said prosecuting attorney, prosecuting attorney told him not to. [49:53.000 --> 49:57.000] So I went to see James Staten. [49:57.000 --> 50:02.000] They told him I was coming. He met me in the hall and he said, Mr. Kelton, you think I'm out of my professional mind? [50:02.000 --> 50:10.000] Do you really think I would waive my immunity in order to give advice to the police? [50:10.000 --> 50:15.000] I said, well, I didn't think so, James. I was just following the thunder here. [50:15.000 --> 50:18.000] So I went back to the police department and knocked on the door. [50:18.000 --> 50:21.000] The policeman came to the door and said, what can I do for you, Mr. Kelton? [50:21.000 --> 50:30.000] I said, well, the county attorney just threw the chief under the bus and I'm here to run over him with it. [50:30.000 --> 50:36.000] But the prosecuting attorney, he fully understood. I give these guys any advice. [50:36.000 --> 50:39.000] I don't have any immunity. [50:39.000 --> 50:48.000] So what I'm looking at, what we were talking about on the break is how do we get whoever performs the act in good faith and claims good faith, [50:48.000 --> 50:52.000] how do we get them to feed us somebody else? [50:52.000 --> 50:54.000] Well, that's what I'd like to know. [50:54.000 --> 51:04.000] That's what I'd like to work out here because, like I say, not just the cop, but I want the judge too. [51:04.000 --> 51:09.000] I want them both to think twice about the, it's criminal conspiracy what they're doing. [51:09.000 --> 51:12.000] It's criminal collusion if it's not conspiracy. [51:12.000 --> 51:18.000] But at least one of them has to know they're committing a crime, and that would be the judge. [51:18.000 --> 51:23.000] Even if the cop's too stupid, the judge isn't, or at least shouldn't be. [51:23.000 --> 51:26.000] He can't claim he is regardless. [51:26.000 --> 51:36.000] So with the judge adjudicating these allegations from a police officer, having to know that they are false [51:36.000 --> 51:47.000] and then suborning perjury from that police officer as a judge in collusion with the city attorney, as the prosecutor, [51:47.000 --> 51:51.000] we have a criminal conspiracy and collusion. [51:51.000 --> 51:53.000] We have a criminal enterprise. [51:53.000 --> 52:01.000] I'm going to suggest that criminal complaints against public officials are a really big deal. [52:01.000 --> 52:09.000] We're doing that up here in Tarrant County, and I just stuck a deal with my prosecuting attorney. [52:09.000 --> 52:16.000] I'm going to file first degree felony aggravated assault charges against my district judge [52:16.000 --> 52:22.000] for threatening to have me arrested when I challenged him for denying me a right. [52:22.000 --> 52:26.000] He had a bailiff come over and put his hand on my arm. [52:26.000 --> 52:32.000] And when I looked at the bailiff and said, Mr. Bailiff, I see you're wearing a pistol down there. [52:32.000 --> 52:35.000] Tell me, is that pistol loaded? Yes, it's loaded. [52:35.000 --> 52:39.000] And then the judge said, you can back down, Mr. Bailiff, because he was watching me, [52:39.000 --> 52:45.000] and he was seeing that I was struggling to keep from grinning at him, and the judge knew something was wrong. [52:45.000 --> 52:52.000] Well, the judge threatened to have me arrested in order to prevent me from exercising a right. [52:52.000 --> 52:59.000] And in doing so, he had this bailiff commit simple assault touching, you know, [52:59.000 --> 53:04.000] in a manner that was intended to be offensive while in his prominently displaying dead weapon, [53:04.000 --> 53:06.000] first degree felony aggravated assault. [53:06.000 --> 53:09.000] The prosecuting attorney is going to stand aside. [53:09.000 --> 53:11.000] I'm going to give it to the grand jury. [53:11.000 --> 53:15.000] Now, they're going to know billing. [53:15.000 --> 53:18.000] Maybe. [53:18.000 --> 53:27.000] The problem they have is they don't know the most powerful thing that I did in Tarrant County was a joke. [53:27.000 --> 53:30.000] I went into court when a friend of mine was having a hearing. [53:30.000 --> 53:33.000] I had one coming up next, Judge Hayes in Mansfield. [53:33.000 --> 53:37.000] And while David was having his hearing, I stood at the bar. [53:37.000 --> 53:39.000] The judge looked out and said, can I help you? [53:39.000 --> 53:44.000] I said, yes, Your Honor, my name is Randall Kelton, and I have a hearing deficiency. [53:44.000 --> 53:46.000] Well, Mr. Kelton, just what's wrong with your hearing? [53:46.000 --> 53:54.000] Oh, Judge, I was down in Mexico the other day, and I drank too much of that cheap tequila and lost my hearing aid. [53:54.000 --> 53:56.000] Well, I lied to him and had it in my pocket. [53:56.000 --> 53:58.000] Well, Mr. Kelton, why are you telling me this? [53:58.000 --> 54:01.000] Well, Judge, do you have a competition for the hearing impaired? [54:01.000 --> 54:03.000] No, Mr. Kelton, I do not. [54:03.000 --> 54:04.000] You got a sound system here. [54:04.000 --> 54:05.000] Will you turn it up? [54:05.000 --> 54:06.000] No, I will not. [54:06.000 --> 54:08.000] Well, then, will you speak up? [54:08.000 --> 54:09.000] And he did. [54:09.000 --> 54:11.000] Told the bailiff I didn't say I'd shut up. [54:11.000 --> 54:13.000] He used to throw me out of the courtroom. [54:13.000 --> 54:17.000] So when I finished my hearing, I got up, walked to the bar, pointed at the bailiff. [54:17.000 --> 54:19.000] You, come with me. [54:19.000 --> 54:23.000] We get outside, and the bailiff says, well, what can I do for you, Mr. Kelton? [54:23.000 --> 54:25.000] I need you to arrest the judge. [54:25.000 --> 54:31.000] Well, why would I arrest the judge, Class A misdemeanor, official oppression, criminal violation 3903 penal code, [54:31.000 --> 54:34.000] in that he failed to perform a duty he is required to perform in the process, [54:34.000 --> 54:38.000] denied me the full free access to or enjoyment of rights. [54:38.000 --> 54:41.000] Well, Mr. Kelton, what right did he deny you in? [54:41.000 --> 54:46.000] He denied me and my right to accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act. [54:46.000 --> 54:52.000] And the bailiff said, well, Mr. Kelton, why did you tell the judge about the Americans with Disabilities Act? [54:52.000 --> 54:56.000] Heck, if I'd have done that, he might have turned the sound up. [54:56.000 --> 55:02.000] The bailiff stood there a minute, and then this grin started across his face. [55:02.000 --> 55:04.000] Well, you set him up. [55:04.000 --> 55:06.000] I said, yeah, he was a sucker for that, wasn't he? [55:06.000 --> 55:10.000] Now I'm going to take him to the grand jury and see what they think about it. [55:10.000 --> 55:19.000] After that, every time either David or myself would go into a court in Tarrant County, [55:19.000 --> 55:24.000] the way they treated us was dramatically different. [55:24.000 --> 55:33.000] It scared the crap out of them because we had already filed against one judge with the grand jury, [55:33.000 --> 55:35.000] and they knew that could happen. [55:35.000 --> 55:37.000] This terrifies them. [55:37.000 --> 55:42.000] So we might look at especially municipal judges. [55:42.000 --> 55:45.000] Eddie, you remember Ken Magnuson? [55:45.000 --> 55:46.000] Yeah. [55:46.000 --> 55:56.000] His brother was a municipal judge, and he said that the Judicial Conduct Commission, [55:56.000 --> 56:00.000] they never discipline county or district judges. [56:00.000 --> 56:03.000] These are lawyer judges. [56:03.000 --> 56:07.000] The municipal judges and JPs are considered inferior court judges [56:07.000 --> 56:09.000] because they don't have to be lawyers. [56:09.000 --> 56:13.000] He said they only discipline JPs and municipal judges [56:13.000 --> 56:18.000] just to make it look like they're actually doing something, and he's right. [56:18.000 --> 56:20.000] They do. [56:20.000 --> 56:28.000] So he, as a municipal judge, was terrified of the Judicial Conduct Commission. [56:28.000 --> 56:34.000] So we really need to complain against them at every opportunity. [56:34.000 --> 56:42.000] I have converted the Judicial Conduct Complaint form into a fill-in-the-blank form. [56:42.000 --> 56:46.000] I have one for bar grievance and Judicial Conduct Complaints. [56:46.000 --> 56:51.000] Anybody going into court should have two or three of those printed out [56:51.000 --> 56:56.000] and lay them on the desk while they're adjudicating their case. [56:56.000 --> 56:58.000] Every time the judge says something you don't like, [56:58.000 --> 57:01.000] you take out one of those and start filling it out. [57:01.000 --> 57:03.000] And maybe a few criminal affidavits. [57:03.000 --> 57:06.000] I feel like criminal affidavits are in front of them all the time, [57:06.000 --> 57:09.000] and it makes them crazy. [57:09.000 --> 57:16.000] I'm not sure we can blame the affidavits on that, but still. [57:16.000 --> 57:18.000] Well, we can file them. [57:18.000 --> 57:23.000] The idea of talking about these issues, [57:23.000 --> 57:30.000] if the officer says that he's acting in good faith reliance, wonderful. [57:30.000 --> 57:33.000] And who are you relying on, Bubba? [57:33.000 --> 57:36.000] Who told you that? [57:36.000 --> 57:38.000] Was it this lawyer over here? [57:38.000 --> 57:40.000] Oh, yeah. [57:40.000 --> 57:44.000] That gets a malpractice suit. [57:44.000 --> 57:50.000] Or, depending on the nature of it, could well be criminal, [57:50.000 --> 57:56.000] if what they're doing denies you in a right. [57:56.000 --> 57:59.000] Okay, we'll go back to your... [57:59.000 --> 58:03.000] I think I kind of got off your subject. [58:03.000 --> 58:05.000] Only while you were talking. [58:05.000 --> 58:07.000] Only while I'm talking. [58:07.000 --> 58:11.000] I tend to be pretty good at going off on tangents. [58:11.000 --> 58:16.000] But I was looking at how do we use these issues [58:16.000 --> 58:23.000] as ferreting out to the greatest effect. [58:23.000 --> 58:25.000] Well, that's what I want to do, [58:25.000 --> 58:28.000] is find the best way to set fire to their little kingdom [58:28.000 --> 58:31.000] and watch it all burn to the ground around them. [58:31.000 --> 58:34.000] I'm up here in Wise County, and I'm an intern. [58:34.000 --> 58:38.000] We're having some serious results hammering these guys, [58:38.000 --> 58:40.000] especially with grand turrets. [58:40.000 --> 58:43.000] This is Eddie Craig. [58:43.000 --> 58:48.000] The graphic show, call in number 512-646-1984. [58:48.000 --> 58:50.000] I hijacked it. [58:50.000 --> 58:54.000] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, [58:54.000 --> 58:56.000] yet countless readers are frustrated [58:56.000 --> 58:58.000] because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.000 --> 59:02.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, [59:02.000 --> 59:04.000] but in the process can compromise [59:04.000 --> 59:07.000] the profound meaning of the Scripture. [59:07.000 --> 59:09.000] Enter the recovery version. [59:09.000 --> 59:13.000] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [59:13.000 --> 59:18.000] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.000 --> 59:22.000] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [59:22.000 --> 59:25.000] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word [59:25.000 --> 59:28.000] beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.000 --> 59:31.000] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version [59:31.000 --> 59:33.000] simply for the asking. [59:33.000 --> 59:36.000] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours [59:36.000 --> 59:43.000] just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:43.000 --> 59:47.000] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:47.000 --> 59:50.000] That's freestudybible.com. [59:50.000 --> 59:53.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, [59:53.000 --> 01:00:00.000] logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000] The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, [01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000] providing your daily bulletins for the commodities market. [01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:12.000] Today in history, news updates [01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:21.000] and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:24.000] Markets for Friday, March 25, 2016, [01:00:24.000 --> 01:00:28.000] are currently treading with gold at $1,216.54 an ounce, [01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:30.000] silver at $15.16 an ounce, [01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:33.000] Texas crude at $39.46 a barrel, [01:00:33.000 --> 01:00:43.000] and Bitcoin is currently sitting in about $415 U.S. currency. [01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:46.000] Today in history, the year 31 CE, [01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:48.000] the first Paschal or Feast of First Fruits, [01:00:48.000 --> 01:00:51.000] known today as Easter because of Romanization, [01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:55.000] took place according to the calendar maker Dionysus Exeges, [01:00:55.000 --> 01:00:58.000] best known as the inventor of Anno Domini, [01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:00.000] the designation for the era after Christ. [01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:03.000] The Feast of First Fruits, third day after Passover, [01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:05.000] when Jesus Christ resurrected from the dead, [01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:10.000] today in history. [01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:11.000] In recent news, [01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:13.000] in a ritual performed before world media [01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:17.000] at the Castel Nuovo di Porto Refugee Center near Rome, [01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:21.000] men and women refugees from Mali, Eritrea, Syria, and Pakistan, [01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:24.000] who were Muslim, Hindu, Catholic, and Coptic Christian, [01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:26.000] had their feet washed by Pope Francis [01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:29.000] on the Catholic Holy Thursday this week. [01:01:29.000 --> 01:01:32.000] Francis said during his homily that all of us together, [01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:35.000] Muslims, Hindus, Catholics, Copts, Evangelicals, [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:38.000] brothers and sisters, children of the same God, [01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:40.000] we want to live in peace, integrated. [01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:43.000] You, we, all of us together, of different religions, [01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:47.000] different cultures, but children of the same Father, brothers. [01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:48.000] Today at this time, [01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:51.000] when I do the same act of Jesus washing the feet of the twelve of you, [01:01:51.000 --> 01:01:53.000] let us all make a gesture of brotherhood, [01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:56.000] and let us all say we are different, we are different, [01:01:56.000 --> 01:01:58.000] we have different cultures and religions, [01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:01.000] but we are brothers and we want to live in peace. [01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:07.000] The first fully autonomous, [01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:10.000] federally approved urban drone delivery unit in the United States [01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:14.000] delivered its first package to a residential location in a small town in Nevada. [01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:16.000] Florida CEO Matt Sweeney announced today [01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:20.000] their six-rotor drone flew itself about one-half mile [01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:23.000] and lowered the package outside a vacant resident in Hawthorne, [01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:25.000] about 140 miles southeast of Reno. [01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:29.000] The route was preprogrammed using GPS, and while a pilot was on standby [01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:31.000] as a backup to the autonomous system, [01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:34.000] they weren't needed during the March 10th delivery. [01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:37.000] Florida conducted the first FAA approved drone delivery last July [01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:41.000] for a series of medical deliveries to a rural health care clinic in Virginia. [01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:45.000] Florida says that the Nevada delivery shows drones can safely navigate around buildings [01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:49.000] and deliver packages within a populated urban area. [01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:53.000] This is Rick Brody with the Lowdown for March 25th, 2016. [01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:24.000] These warm unders come by that term rightly [01:03:28.000 --> 01:03:31.000] I won't pay for the war with my body [01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:34.000] Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money [01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:38.000] I won't pay for the fun with my body [01:03:38.000 --> 01:03:41.000] That man's wicked and their logic shoddy [01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:45.000] Ain't gonna pay for the oil with my body [01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:47.000] I won't pay for the boys with my money [01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:49.000] All right, folks, good evening. [01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:53.000] This is Rule of Law Radio with my special guest, Randy Kelton, [01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:56.000] and we're talking about these municipal judges [01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:00.000] and getting them to act properly, which they won't do, [01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:05.000] and whether or not they're acting judicially when they won't act properly, [01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:07.000] and how we go after them. [01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:14.000] Just FYI, the caller board is open, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number. [01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:19.000] All right, Randy, any other suggestions that we could use for this [01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:21.000] while we're waiting on some callers to get up, [01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:24.000] hopefully with some good ideas and some suggestions of their own? [01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:27.000] Well, these are some nice arguments, [01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:33.000] and one of the things I find with municipal judges and prosecutors, [01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:36.000] they're not the sharpest knives in the drawer. [01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:38.000] No, but they certainly are arrogant. [01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:41.000] Yeah, and that makes it even better, [01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:44.000] because I have this rule, [01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:48.000] never ask a public official to do anything you actually want him to do, [01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:50.000] because you never ask him to do anything [01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:53.000] unless the law specifically requires him to do so, [01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:55.000] and then when he doesn't, you get to beat him up, [01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:58.000] and this is how we beat him up. [01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:01.000] One thing I know is that municipal judges are afraid [01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:04.000] of the state commissioner on judicial conduct. [01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:07.000] Now, county and district judges aren't, [01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:09.000] but municipal judges are, [01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:16.000] so that should get a judicial conduct complaint every time they move. [01:05:16.000 --> 01:05:24.000] Even if the state commissioner on judicial conduct doesn't go after these guys, [01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:27.000] it's going to raise the bond rating, [01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:30.000] and I have someone else I want to get on there, [01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:32.000] he's a good friend, [01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:36.000] and what he does is when he files a bar agreement [01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:41.000] or judicial conduct complaint is he sends the complaint [01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:44.000] to the state insurance commissioner, [01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:47.000] and he sends one to Lloyds of London. [01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:53.000] His rationale is Lloyds of London underwrites everyone [01:05:53.000 --> 01:06:00.000] who underwrites these judges' bonds, [01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:06.000] and the state commissioner of insurance is the one [01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:11.000] who administers the bonds for the state. [01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:15.000] So it's not about getting them judicially disciplined, [01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:18.000] because that almost never happens. [01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:20.000] It's about raising the bond rating. [01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:24.000] You get the bond rating high enough in their history. [01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:26.000] So that's one thing, and then bar grievances, [01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:28.000] of course, against these prosecutors. [01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:31.000] These prosecutors, they get out of law school, [01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:36.000] and most of these guys thought they were mascots for the beer companies, [01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:40.000] and they didn't exactly graduate at the top of their class, [01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:44.000] but they got this $100,000 to $180,000 student loan, [01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:47.000] depending on how much the parents threw in, [01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:50.000] and so they got a big nut to crack, [01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:53.000] but they don't get picked up by a law firm, [01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:55.000] and they have no idea how to practice law, [01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:58.000] so they go to work for the municipality, [01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:01.000] make chump change where they don't have to practice law, [01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:03.000] their dudes make deals. [01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:08.000] You start grieving them, they can't do anything else. [01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:10.000] They can't practice law in the society anymore, [01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:15.000] because you can't get malpractice insurance. [01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:22.000] We can't hurt them as much legally as we can financially, [01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:25.000] and bar grievances and duties of conduct complaints work, [01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:32.000] and we are finding that criminal complaints really get these guys high-stepping. [01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:34.000] Okay, I'm going to shut up now. [01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:37.000] We've got three callers, and I'm going to let Eddie. [01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:38.000] All righty. [01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:41.000] Okay, let's see who we can get up on the board here. [01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:44.000] We have Oliver in Tennessee. [01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:47.000] Oliver, what do you got? [01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:48.000] Oh, that moved. [01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:49.000] Oliver, let's try this again. [01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:50.000] Hello? [01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:51.000] Yeah, go ahead. [01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:53.000] How you doing, Eddie? [01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:59.000] I wanted to call and tell you thank you for all your insight. [01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:01.000] I brought your program. [01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:06.000] I didn't really have time to go over it and, you know, put everything to work, [01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:10.000] but through my time of listening to the radio and everything, [01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:15.000] I've been going to court, and I've been getting a lot of things throughout. [01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:17.000] I just got a big case that's being thrown out, [01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:23.000] and I'm trying to see how to go about it because a friend of mine got stopped. [01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:25.000] She was following me home. [01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:26.000] She got stopped. [01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:27.000] I didn't see where she was at. [01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:28.000] I doubled back. [01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:30.000] I doubled back to check up on her. [01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:33.000] They had her pulled over in a parking lot. [01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:35.000] I pulled her in the parking lot. [01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:40.000] I got out of the car, and I'm sitting there waiting for her to be released. [01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:46.000] The cop approached me telling me that she told him that I'm her ride [01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:48.000] and they need to see my ID and all that. [01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:51.000] I was like, no, that's not happening. [01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:58.000] They were like, well, you know, it's a lawful order and all this, blah, blah, blah. [01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:00.000] I called 911. [01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:06.000] I told them that I wanted a sergeant and a captain down there or a lieutenant. [01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:08.000] Eddie, I like this guy. [01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:10.000] Yeah. [01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:13.000] I told them that I want a sergeant and a captain down there. [01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:18.000] The idea is to get these officers away from me because they had no business around me. [01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:22.000] So then the officer said, well, I'm going to run your name. [01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:26.000] And if your name, if you've got a percent of license, I'm taking you to jail [01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:29.000] because that's the only reason you could be doing this and that. [01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:32.000] I'm like, no, because you have no business, you know what I'm saying, [01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:33.000] talking to me about anything. [01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:35.000] I'm watching you do your job. [01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:40.000] So I asked him for his name and bad number during that incident. [01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:45.000] He didn't want to, during the tape, you know, I have a speech impediment and it was cold. [01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:52.000] And I was really trying to keep, be polite because I'm not listening to you. [01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:57.000] I took in that advice of being trying to be polite and said I'm more of, [01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:01.000] I want my rights and you ain't going to do nothing to them type of person. [01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:09.000] But I tried to keep my cool and I was stuttering and he was making fun of that. [01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:14.000] Once the sergeant and everything got there, they put me in handcuffs, [01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:22.000] said that I was under arrest, the NCIC came back, my license was suspended [01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:28.000] and the sergeant and captain decided to, well, I wasn't arrested, [01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:31.000] I wasn't arrested yet for the driver's offense. [01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:35.000] They arrested me for calling 911. [01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:37.000] They arrested me for calling 911. [01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:46.000] Then afterwards the sergeant, the cop who stopped the young lady that was following me home decided, [01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:51.000] well, since they arrested him for that, I'm going to throw in the suspended license too. [01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:55.000] So now going through court, going through everything, I'm asking for the video tapes. [01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:57.000] They said, well, there's no video tapes. [01:10:57.000 --> 01:10:59.000] I'm like, well, there's no video tapes. [01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:00.000] Where's the discovery? [01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:03.000] They handed me the discovery with only the 911 call. [01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:05.000] I'm like, there's no video tapes. [01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:12.000] No, that's okay. At least I went and filed for the video tapes at the department. [01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:14.000] A couple days later, they told me to come pick up the video tapes. [01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:17.000] Everything was on the video tapes. [01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:23.000] Once I got the video tapes, the next two days I go up there, I'm getting copies of paperwork [01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:31.000] and the attorney sees me and he goes calling my cell phone like he didn't see me in court. [01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:37.000] So all the charges are going to be dropped and I think he figured that I'm making a move, [01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:43.000] collecting information on what I need to go forward with the next process [01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:46.000] because I know I got him dead in the water. [01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:53.000] So with my thing is what kind of charges can I get on this captain and this lieutenant [01:11:53.000 --> 01:12:00.000] for turning around and pressing charges on me when it was their job to protect me from being apprehended by... [01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:02.000] Official oppression. Well, it depends. [01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:04.000] I don't know what they'd officially be called in your state. [01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:11.000] Here in Texas, you could hit them with official oppression, abuse of official capacity, official misconduct. [01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:16.000] Yeah, in Tennessee, they don't have official oppression. [01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:20.000] It's all grouped under official misconduct. [01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:22.000] All grouped under official misconduct. [01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:23.000] Yeah. [01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:26.000] And is this something I'm going to have to do myself? [01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:28.000] Am I going to have to learn federal system myself? [01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:30.000] Because I can't... [01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:32.000] If you want to... [01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:39.000] The only problem is the DOJ is only going to take a complaint if you allege excessive force [01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:43.000] or a frame up of some kind, which you're not going to have in this case. [01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:50.000] What you're going to have here is simply a failure to protect an individual from their own internal abuses. [01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:52.000] Wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:56.000] This may sound indelicate, Oliver, but are you black? [01:12:56.000 --> 01:12:57.000] Yes. [01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:00.000] Profiling. [01:13:00.000 --> 01:13:02.000] How about the positive? [01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:05.000] If you were a white guy, they wouldn't have done that to you. [01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:06.000] Yeah, you can... [01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:10.000] Now, that one you can take to the DOJ, and that would definitely get attention. [01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:18.000] You can claim that you were racially profiled, and it's potentially the case that you were. [01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:25.000] But the problem I see with you in this particular case is you're not the one they initially stopped. [01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:30.000] They accosted you because you stayed to aid your friend. [01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:31.000] Right. [01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:34.000] Is she black? Is she white? Is she Hispanic? What? [01:13:34.000 --> 01:13:35.000] She's black. [01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:44.000] Okay. Then profiling might still be an issue. [01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:55.000] Yeah, the fact that they lacked probable cause from the beginning goes to trespass ab initio. [01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:03.000] So they put the cuffs on you before they knew they're... Did you have a warrant out against you? [01:14:03.000 --> 01:14:05.000] No. [01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:06.000] Oh, so? [01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:11.000] My driver's license was not even suspended. [01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:12.000] It wasn't? [01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:15.000] No, it was valid. [01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:19.000] Oh, then that's false imprisonment. [01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:32.000] And every municipality, every governmental agency has waived its sovereign immunity for charges of false imprisonment. [01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:35.000] Well, what does that mean? [01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:38.000] You're standing over here minding your own business. [01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:39.000] Right. [01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:46.000] You've done nothing to give them reasonable probable cause to believe that you've committed a crime. [01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:50.000] And they insist that you identify yourself. [01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:56.000] Well, I'm not familiar with exactly how the codes are written in Tennessee. [01:14:56.000 --> 01:15:04.000] But in Texas, they can force you to identify yourself once you have been arrested. [01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:15.000] So in order to insist that you identify yourself, they have to have reasonable probable cause to believe. [01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:16.000] Right. [01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:27.000] Where you're just standing there and because you are obviously guilty of being black, that's not sufficient probable cause. [01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:33.000] So once they step across that line, then they're trespassers ab initio. [01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:39.000] They lie and say that she told them that I was her rise. [01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:42.000] That's what they wrote on the police report. [01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:44.000] That's not what the video shows. [01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:50.000] Then that says that you had business to be there. [01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:55.000] So you weren't just somebody hanging around or loitering. [01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:58.000] You had a reason to be there. [01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:01.000] And they knew that you had a reason to be there. [01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:05.000] This is false imprisonment. [01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:09.000] And there is no immunity for false imprisonment. [01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:11.000] Okay. [01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:14.000] And is that so out of that whole scenario? [01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:15.000] Okay. [01:16:15.000 --> 01:16:17.000] Here's what you do first. [01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:24.000] After they arrest me, they ran a dog around my car and they said that the dog hit it. [01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:25.000] Then they searched my vehicle. [01:16:25.000 --> 01:16:29.000] They didn't find anything in it, but they searched my vehicle and you could see them searching it on camera. [01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:32.000] This is all racial profanity. [01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:34.000] That's all this is. [01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:39.000] And you need to start putting together a tort letter. [01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:41.000] Oh, tort letters. [01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:42.000] There's so much fun. [01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:45.000] You won't believe it. [01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:46.000] Well, all right. [01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:48.000] I've got to figure out what that is. [01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:49.000] Hold on. [01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:50.000] We're about to go to break. [01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:58.000] This is Eddie Craig, Rule of Law Radio, here with his favorite, special, greatest ever guest, Randy Kelton. [01:16:58.000 --> 01:17:01.000] We'll be right back. [01:17:28.000 --> 01:17:30.000] We'll be right back. [01:17:58.000 --> 01:18:01.000] This is Logos Radio Network on the air. [01:18:28.000 --> 01:18:37.000] We have come to trust Jungevity so much, we became a marketing distributor, along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:45.000] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:49.000] As you realize the benefits of Jungevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:54.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, [01:18:54.000 --> 01:18:59.000] and increase your income. [01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:00.000] Order now. [01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:11.000] This is the Logos Radio Network. [01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:27.000] Ain't gonna blame me, don't bore me. [01:19:27.000 --> 01:19:53.000] Well, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. I was blindsided, but now I can see your plan. You put the beer in my pocket, took the money from my hand. Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. [01:19:53.000 --> 01:20:00.000] All right, folks, we are back, and we are talking to Oliver in Tennessee. All right, Oliver, continue on, please. [01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:14.000] Okay, Oliver, I'm going to suggest you write a tort letter. You said you got Eddie's traffic seminar. Did you also get jurisdictionary? [01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:19.000] No, I'd just say the one that was 250. [01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:28.000] Okay, you might look at jurisdictionary. You get done with jurisdictionary, you will wipe the floor with these guys. [01:20:28.000 --> 01:20:35.000] They have screwed up so bad. [01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:42.000] As far as the jurisdictionary is for civil lawsuits, so yeah, it'll teach you everything you need to know about going through a civil suit. [01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:50.000] The only thing you have to do is learn that it doesn't deal with specifically suing government officials, which is what you would be doing. [01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:59.000] But that's just a little bit of extra side study, but how to file the lawsuit and maintain it, that's in there and that you need to know. [01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:08.000] And most of this stuff, they don't teach lawyers in law school. They don't learn this until they get out. This is actually how you, they teach lawyers how to argue legal issues. [01:21:08.000 --> 01:21:17.000] I believe you, because like you said, I'm a black man and when I go to court, I go to court with some Jordans socks and with sweatpants and suits. [01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:28.000] And when they see me, they run like rats. I can't believe it. They see me and just disappear. I'm like, what is going on? [01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:39.000] I had a guy come to one of my seminars once and I had jerked him around in Williamson County and I was in a suit and I never told him who I was. [01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:48.000] I was demanding and obnoxious. And he said, have you ever walked into a room and click the lights on and watch the cockroaches scatter? [01:21:48.000 --> 01:22:00.000] That's what it looked like. You'll get the pleasure of seeing the public official chicken dance. [01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:05.000] Do they know exactly what's going on? [01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:14.000] Well, the thing about it is the reason, in my opinion, that they give you such a wide berth is because you're their worst nightmare in a couple of ways. [01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:29.000] One, you're an informed black man. Two, you're an informed black man that won't back down from their BS and will cause them more trouble than they consider having because of it. [01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:32.000] Therefore, they avoid you. [01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:38.000] They know something that they realize you're beginning to understand. [01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:49.000] The place where most folks, white, black, doesn't matter, screw up is when they go in there with an attitude and no knowledge and information. [01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:58.000] Attitude is good if you can pair it up with those, but it sucks when it's all you've got. [01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:08.000] Exactly. And once you've done your homework a little, you'll realize that when you walk into a courthouse, you are the baddest motor scooter in the building. [01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:22.000] And there's only one reason you're the baddest motor scooter in the building. It's because you're nobody. You're not a judge. You're not a lawyer. You're not a bailiff or a clerk. They're all public servants. [01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:24.000] It was designed for us. [01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:25.000] You are the master. [01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:27.000] It's supposed to be designed for us. [01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:28.000] Right. [01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:36.000] You're the master. They're the servants. And they realize when they, they can look at your face and they know that you know. [01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:44.000] And they understand. They're fully aware. You're the baddest motor scooter around. You're the one that knows how to kick their behinds. [01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:54.000] And there's not anything they can do to you. When you start taking the fight to them, now you poison their well. [01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:06.000] Now they come back and say anything to you. When I start filing complaints, if I get somebody, you know, a judge or a bailiff to say, oh, man, you better be careful. [01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:11.000] You can get in a lot of trouble. Trampling of the witness, obstruction of justice, both of them felonies. [01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:17.000] Say, go ahead, threaten me again, Bubba. We see how this works out for you. [01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:25.000] You really do have the power if you just kind of learn a few of the tools. And there's not a lot to get you a dictionary, man. [01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:33.000] It will be way worth it. You'll get these cops to where they see your license plate and they'll do like to do Scott Richardson. [01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:39.000] They'll follow you a little bit, run your plates and pull out around you and get the heck out of there. [01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:45.000] Okay. Let me give you another scenario. I'll call you back on the other one because I won't take too much of your time. [01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:50.000] But my house recently burned. A friend of mine was helping me clean up everything. [01:24:50.000 --> 01:24:54.000] I'm the one who called you last time about the city bothering me about that burnt house. [01:24:54.000 --> 01:25:04.000] When he went into the city hall and I had a meeting with him and I told him about the act that you explained to me and I explained myself. [01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:11.000] I sat there very calmly. He took off a rant like a baby, like a big baby. I'm sitting there like, I didn't believe this. [01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:15.000] I'm like, I thought you was a city official. You wanted to go to war. I'm just sitting here. [01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:22.000] I'm like, listen, you say you have procedures. I have procedures also. If you follow through with anything further, [01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:25.000] I'm going to let you get away with jazz so far by coming to my property illegally. [01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:31.000] But if you follow anything further, I'm going to press charges on your seat and his seat. [01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:36.000] They have not bothered me ever since. They haven't even come down the street again. [01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:40.000] Good. Those are the kinds of things I love to hear. [01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:49.000] The cold lady came down here and was like telling me thanks because they've been running her around ragged for years. [01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:59.000] And they said that now she comes in the office, they disappear because they've been harassing her trying to make me do stuff and I wouldn't do it. [01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:04.000] And then now she's like, well, I'm not doing anything until you make Oliver do what he needs to do. [01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:08.000] And they have not bothered her since. And she came down here telling me thank you. [01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:12.000] I'm the first person. And she's been there for over 16 years. [01:26:12.000 --> 01:26:17.000] No one has ever put them in that position. And I'm sitting here like wow. [01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:25.000] But I fell asleep at a stoplight. It was late. And the stoplight is very long. It's two blocks away from my house. [01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:29.000] When I woke up, the cop was knocking on my window. [01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:35.000] And we had a bad incident before that where they pulled me out of the car. And I told him that ain't happening again. [01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:38.000] But when I woke up, he was telling me I had to get out of the car. [01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:43.000] I was kind of, you know what I'm saying, heated because I don't like to see cops. I just woke up. [01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:45.000] I'm trying to get home. We worked all day. [01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:50.000] So I'm trying to wake up my friends to talk me out because I'm like if I get out of this car, I'm going to hurt this cop. [01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:54.000] I'm trying to wake him up to talk me out about what I'm about to do. He wouldn't wake up. [01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:59.000] So I rolled my window down the car like, oh, you were sleeping in the car. You got to get out of the car. [01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:06.000] And so I looked at him. I'm like, you know what? When the light turns green, I'm leaving. [01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:12.000] And he was like, well, no, you're being detained. And I looked at him being detained. I said, OK. [01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:18.000] I rolled up my window and I put my car in drive. And I waited for the light to turn green. [01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:23.000] And by that time, my friend was waking up because he was seeing all the lights and hearing the noise. [01:27:23.000 --> 01:27:29.000] The light turned green. I took off, went home, and got out of the car. [01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:35.000] And I went to my neighbor's house and relaxed for a evening because I knew that in that state that I was just waking up, [01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:38.000] I was very violent in that state. [01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:44.000] And I knew it was not going to be a good encounter because I've had several encounters before. [01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:51.000] So they come search my property, search the car, search the property, everything. [01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:55.000] And they can't find me. So they go put out warrants for me. They put out warrants. [01:27:55.000 --> 01:27:59.000] Wait a minute, Aubrey. Go quickly. We've only got two segments left. [01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:07.000] OK. They put out warrants for me. They put out warrants for driving system license and spaying and looting police officers. [01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:11.000] Right? I already got the case. I already got the cases dismissed. [01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:19.000] They had to send a felony upstairs to get dismissed. I got it all done and taken care of without showing anything. [01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:23.000] They said that there was no wrong for following me and chasing me. [01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:29.000] It's supposed to be a civilian safety check. They had no rights and all that. [01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:35.000] How can I get them on that also, right? For coming to my house, searching my property without a warrant. [01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:41.000] Absolutely. That's all illegal search and seizures. That's a violation of rights. [01:28:41.000 --> 01:28:48.000] And following me and filing charges, felony evading charges and... [01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:54.000] Well, they're the only issue is whether or not they actually arrested you after filing the charges. [01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:57.000] You can make the allegation they falsified the charges, [01:28:57.000 --> 01:29:04.000] but you don't have a harm unless they arrested you on those charges or did something to you based upon that. [01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:07.000] I had to go turn myself in. [01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:13.000] OK. But what did they do after you turned yourself in? Did they put you in jail? Did they let you go? What? [01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:21.000] I had to go. They put me in jail. They charged me and I had to pay $6,000 a warrant on one. [01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:25.000] OK. Then you've got a claim of harm. [01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:31.000] OK. And I'll learn everything I need to know in jurisdiction. [01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:34.000] As far as the lawsuit, yes. [01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:36.000] OK. All right. Thank you. [01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:38.000] You're welcome. [01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:39.000] All right. [01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:44.000] Thanks for calling in, man. All right, folks, we've got another break coming up and two more segments in the show. [01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:47.000] Call in number 512-646-1984. [01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:52.000] We've got some people up on the board, which hopefully we'll get to everybody before we get to the end of the show. [01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:57.000] So y'all hang in there and we will be right back after this break. [01:30:04.000 --> 01:30:06.000] Put down that soda and back away. [01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:13.000] New research shows drinking one sugary soft drink a day dramatically increases men's odds of developing aggressive prostate cancer. [01:30:13.000 --> 01:30:17.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. Back with details in a moment. [01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:23.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:28.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:33.000] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:36.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:43.000] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:46.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:50.000] If you're a man who chugs soft drinks, I've got some bad news. [01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:54.000] A 15-year study finds men who drink just one can of soda a day [01:30:54.000 --> 01:31:00.000] were a whopping 40 percent more likely to develop prostate cancer than those who avoid the stuff. [01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:04.000] Swedish researchers tracked the diets and health of 8,000 men. [01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:10.000] They found a clear link between soda and sugary soft drinks and more aggressive, fast-growing forms of the disease. [01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:19.000] Their analysis also linked consuming large amounts of rice, pasta, cakes, and sugary cereals with a less serious form of prostate cancer. [01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:24.000] So fellas, swap that soda for water. The family jewels will be very grateful. [01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000] Thousands of my fellow first responders have died. [01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:50.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000] I'm a New York City correction office. [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:56.000] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:58.000] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:04.000] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. [01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:07.000] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:12.000] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it. [01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:15.000] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:22.000] That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:27.000] If you accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints, [01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:33.000] you can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:39.000] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:46.000] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:51.000] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.000] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:02.000] Me and I actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:13.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:22.000] Yeah, who you want to chip? Who you take me for? Free Tully? Who you want to chip? Me no free Tully. You can't chip me. Oh, I'm sorry. [01:33:22.000 --> 01:33:27.000] Don't let them chip you in the morning, chip you in the evening, put a chip in your body. [01:33:27.000 --> 01:33:42.000] And anyway, when you go computer reading, you can't hide me from nobody. When you say chip in your mom, chip in your daddy, chip in your grandpa and the granny, chip in me, chip in your baby, chip in your family, whole family. [01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:47.000] All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:53.000] All right. Now we have Truth Raider on the line here. Raider, what do you got? [01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:57.000] Good evening, gentlemen. What a deal. Two for the price of one tonight. [01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:01.000] Boy, boy. And this is my late birthday present, I guess. [01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:06.000] Hey, these guys, I guess, don't believe in the Easter money, I guess. I don't know. [01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:17.000] I went out early yesterday morning, because I had to, because I work as a tennis official, and I had to take care of a match between USC and Oregon, University of Oregon yesterday. [01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:20.000] So that's the only reason why I didn't have to go out, but I had to go. [01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:26.000] And 8.30 in the morning, a rainy, cool, clammy morning with nobody out and around. Oh, they're taking their break. [01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:31.000] They're having their coffee, donuts, whatever, worshiping Satan or whatever. I have no idea what they were doing. [01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:41.000] But lo and behold, that one come out from right behind me, did it again. This time, I recorded him. [01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:44.000] Okay. Recorded him doing what? [01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:57.000] Initiating an illegal traffic stop, making the presumption that I'm engaged in commerce and in transportation because I have plates and expired tags on my so-called vehicle. [01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:02.000] Okay. So the question you have is? [01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:07.000] Well, I don't have a question on it. That's just reporting the most recent one. And just think of these guys. [01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:16.000] I mean, what nerve. On Easter Sunday morning, I mean, give the public a break. Come on. [01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:24.000] I can see if I was screwing around on a Friday night or a Saturday night, and I was putting myself in harm's way, and I was doing stupid things on my own volition. [01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:29.000] But it's 830 in the morning. I could be going to a service or something like that for Easter morning. [01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:42.000] Not really relevant because there is no law so immoral or so minor that some police officer won't kill you to enforce it. [01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:52.000] Yeah. I don't doubt that. Okay. My question is going to be related to the case that I won. You hear that, Randy? I won. [01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:56.000] Good. You have crowing rights. [01:35:56.000 --> 01:36:08.000] Yes, I does. Now, you mentioned a tort letter. Now, that is the initial letter that I've got to write to the county that I live in and the sheriff's department [01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:13.000] because Eddie suggested I should sue the county because they have the deeper pockets. [01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:28.000] Generally, since the sheriff is a county officer, the state will construe any suit against one of those officers as a suit against the county. [01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:40.000] And most counties require that you send them notice and opportunity to cure, and that's what your tort letter is, and give them at least 60 days to cure. [01:36:40.000 --> 01:36:46.000] They never cure, but the tort letter is going to get them all hopping up and down. [01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:53.000] Yeah. You've given them their ability to handle all of their administrative remedies, and you've exhausted yours at that time. [01:36:53.000 --> 01:37:00.000] Once they fail to respond and make you whole, you've done what you could do without actually having to file suit. [01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:09.000] Okay. So you recommend that I should do that first for them to come up with a settlement and, as you said, to cure the situation. [01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:10.000] Correct. [01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:17.000] Okay. All right, then I'll do that. And I file it where at? Do I file it at the county courthouse? [01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:27.000] No, you file it with, you can either send it to the commissioner's court, to the sheriff, and just put in there, notice to agent is notice to principal, [01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:31.000] notice to principal is notice to agent, and then it doesn't matter which one you send it to. [01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:43.000] Generally, the county judge, not the county court at law, but the county judge, the judge at the commissioner's court would generally be the one that would get that. [01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:45.000] Okay. All right. I'll be working on that. [01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:51.000] Now, this is what I'm going to do, gentlemen. Weeks in advance, the citation was, of course, written yesterday morning, the illegal stop, [01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:59.000] and he cited me for driving while uninsured, driving without a license, and driving with expired tags. [01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:04.000] So I'm going to take that uniform complaint. Now, you guys were talking earlier about that. [01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:13.000] Well, the deal is, I'll cut it short here. The deal is he admitted on camera that these are not crimes. These are infractions. [01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:22.000] He did admit that to me. So with that, I'm going to take it down to the city municipal court. [01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:27.000] That's what's dealing with this one in my town. They have their own municipal city court. [01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:33.000] Okay. Okay. Hold on. In Oregon, what is the definition of an infraction? [01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:39.000] They are civil. I've already looked. They are civil infractions. All infractions are civil. [01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:46.000] Yeah. Well, the only thing they could do if you fail to pay the fine that they try to oppress you with and try to call your bluff on, [01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:51.000] they send it to a collection agency, and you get constant, every couple of weeks or two to three weeks or so on average, [01:38:51.000 --> 01:39:01.000] you get a bill for that for a vast amount, like $3,944,000 for just the two infractions that I had last summer. [01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:05.000] The very first ticket, that's already $3,900 just for that alone. [01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:08.000] And that becomes usurious. [01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:09.000] Yeah. [01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:13.000] Does the state have an exemption from usury? [01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:22.000] Apparently, well, I don't know. Apparently not. This is something that is sent by a named collection agency here. [01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:31.000] And they say that the ones who are, I guess apparently the victims or the ones who are the plaintiffs or the plaintiffs [01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:38.000] is Happy Valley Court for the county of Clackamas for the city of Happy Valley. That's that one. [01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:55.000] Okay. Wait. In Texas, if a collection agency collects for a governmental entity, they don't fall under the consumer protection laws. [01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:06.000] Is it the same in Oregon? But since these are civil infractions, do these collection agencies fall under the consumer protection laws? [01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:12.000] I don't think so. I think if I challenge it, I could probably have them go away. [01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:19.000] A little validation letter and qualified written request. [01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:25.000] Right. Yeah. I'm going to try to battle that right now, but they just keep sending that. [01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:29.000] I want to nip this in the bud early, gentlemen. I want to go down there and file that. [01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:34.000] Eddie sent me an email that had the steps to challenging that script is the one that, as you said, [01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:39.000] when you turn on the light, they all run like cockroaches under the refrigerator. [01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:47.000] That was fun. They didn't show up for the trial day for the very last one I've had with the officer arresting me, [01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:51.000] so called for not presenting the photo ID to him on demand. [01:40:51.000 --> 01:41:00.000] So that one, that's the challenge. And what was contained in there, the literature that Eddie sent me, [01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:07.000] when I filed that with the court, they didn't show up for the trial day afterwards to answer that. [01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:12.000] So I'm going to use that step and, of course, rearrange the words to fit this particular officer, [01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:16.000] his badge number, and the activity that happened, using it the same. [01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:20.000] And I want to go down to the court. I have it almost complete. I'm writing it out tonight. [01:41:20.000 --> 01:41:24.000] Make sure everything is correct. All my dots are dotted and my Ts are crossed. [01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:31.000] And I'm going to take it down and file it to the sitting in this court well before the court date. [01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:37.000] Now, is that proper to do? [01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:43.000] You can file anything before the date, so why are you asking if it's proper? [01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:47.000] Well, I just want to make sure that using that step is the challenge that you sent me. [01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:52.000] Is that a good argument to use? Is that a good defense for me to use? [01:41:52.000 --> 01:41:59.000] The stop itself was illegal. A civil infraction is not a crime. [01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:08.000] An officer cannot be authorized to seize persons or property for a non-crime, not without a warrant, [01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:15.000] which he can't get without probable cause, which doesn't exist without a crime. [01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:19.000] Well, what he says on tape is, well, it's a traffic stop. [01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:26.000] No, it's a civil infraction. Traffic stop or not, it's a civil infraction, [01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:31.000] making the seizure without a warrant illegal. [01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:36.000] I'd like to get this officer to call into your show and let him know that. [01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:40.000] No, you sue his butt and you let him know that. [01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:45.000] Yeah, I plan on it. I've got to get everything done here right. It's going to take time. [01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:50.000] Last question, how much time do I have with this case going back to October [01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:54.000] with this sheriff's deputy that arrested me and false imprisoned me? [01:42:54.000 --> 01:42:58.000] How much time do I have to get this done? [01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:03.000] It depends. You'll have to see what the notice requirements are in your particular state [01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:05.000] for those types of suits against governmental entities. [01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:08.000] For here, for instance, you've got six months to provide notice [01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:13.000] and up to a year or two years to file, depending upon what the allegation is. [01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:19.000] False imprisonment is one year. Most states I've looked at were one year. [01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:25.000] While they waive their sovereign immunity, they don't give you much time to get after them. [01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:28.000] Okay, gotcha, gotcha. Very good. [01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:31.000] All right, well, this is becoming a little bit more fun as time goes on. [01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:33.000] I'm learning a little bit more about this and understanding it [01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:35.000] and applying the proper tools that need to win this. [01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:37.000] So with that note, gentlemen, I'll let you guys go. [01:43:37.000 --> 01:43:40.000] Get on to the next call before the show ends and thank you guys. [01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:43.000] All right, thanks for calling in, Raider. [01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:45.000] All right, folks, y'all hang in there. [01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:50.000] We'll be right back after this break to see if we can't finish everybody up before the end of the show, [01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:53.000] which I've only got a couple of you on here, so that shouldn't be too difficult. [01:43:53.000 --> 01:44:00.000] Y'all hang on. We'll be right back. [01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:03.000] You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics? [01:44:03.000 --> 01:44:04.000] Sorry! [01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:07.000] Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve? [01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000] What? [01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:13.000] If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity. [01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:16.000] Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, [01:44:16.000 --> 01:44:19.000] I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age. [01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000] I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television. [01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:30.000] Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope. [01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000] The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover, [01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000] and because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested. [01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:50.000] So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 [01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:55.000] or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com. [01:44:55.000 --> 01:44:58.000] Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary [01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:01.000] and an overall increase in mental functioning. [01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:11.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course [01:45:11.000 --> 01:45:15.000] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:49.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:49.000 --> 01:46:01.000] pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:20.000 --> 01:46:26.000] If you could not wait any longer, what would your purpose have to be done? [01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:32.000] Watch a gentleman, a soldier, a warrior, a hard-lock, a scuffle that keeps his peace. [01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:35.000] All is taken in the misunderstanding. [01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:37.000] Somebody calls the police. [01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:40.000] Watch in the spotlight. [01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:46.000] Watch in the spotlight. [01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:52.000] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:57.000] We are in the last segment of our show, and we've got two callers left up on the board. [01:46:57.000 --> 01:47:00.000] And the first one is Terry in Michigan. [01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:02.000] All right, Terry, what do you got? [01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:04.000] Yes, good evening, gentlemen. [01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:10.000] The judicial immunity that you brought up is interesting. [01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:15.000] A couple of years ago, a friend of mine, he got a ticket for no plates and no insurance. [01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:23.000] And the court ended up sending some paperwork stating that he was facing a possible jail and a fine. [01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:30.000] And he sent back in paperwork challenging to subject matter jurisdiction, [01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:34.000] not in Congress or transportation, and demanding a jury trial. [01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:38.000] And when he got into court, he stated the same thing. [01:47:38.000 --> 01:47:46.000] And the first thing the judge stated, well, hey, we all know that I have jurisdiction as far as a jury trial. [01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:48.000] This is a civil infraction. [01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:52.000] And he set it on the record. The whole thing was all on the record. [01:47:52.000 --> 01:47:59.000] And what I was wondering is, from what you were saying earlier, if that was a civil infraction, [01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:03.000] would the judge still have judicial immunity? [01:48:03.000 --> 01:48:10.000] Well, if they were acting judicially, which is what this whole discussion tonight was about, then yes. [01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:15.000] But the issue here was why your friend didn't challenge the initial seizure. [01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:17.000] See, here's the thing. [01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:21.000] When you are seized by the officer without a warrant, [01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:25.000] one of the things that the states required to prove but never does in these cases, [01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:33.000] because they never even mention it, was whether or not the initial seizure was legal and lawful. [01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:40.000] Remember, this is a seizure without a warrant, which by definition is unlawful. [01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:44.000] That's why the court must have a probable cause determination, [01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:49.000] first and foremost to see if the initial seizure was lawful. [01:48:49.000 --> 01:48:52.000] If it wasn't, nothing else matters. [01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:56.000] So when they seize you for a civil infraction, [01:48:56.000 --> 01:49:02.000] and there is no warrant for any crime associated with that infraction, [01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:05.000] the seizure is completely illegal. [01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:12.000] Therefore, everything that results from that seizure falls under fruit of the poison tree doctrine. [01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:14.000] Everything can be suppressed. [01:49:14.000 --> 01:49:23.000] Everything is inadmissible because the initial seizure itself was unlawful and illegal. [01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:27.000] So rather than challenging just the jurisdiction of the court, [01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:33.000] you challenge the jurisdiction based upon the court that the initial arrest was unlawful, [01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:39.000] and the state has not met its burden of proof to establish that the initial warrantless seizure [01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:44.000] and arrest was lawful. [01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:46.000] You follow? [01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:48.000] Yeah, I do now at the time. [01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:55.000] Yeah, when the state doesn't even mention the fact that you were seized without a warrant [01:49:55.000 --> 01:50:01.000] and then fails to prove that that seizure was justifiably lawful, [01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:08.000] well, then everything they're doing is wrong. [01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:15.000] The court can't have jurisdiction for an illegal search and an illegal seizure. [01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:20.000] Yeah, they kind of caught us off guard, though, because like I say, the initial paperwork, [01:50:20.000 --> 01:50:24.000] and we weren't sure if it was a criminal offense or a civil offense [01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:29.000] because the initial paperwork was stating that he was facing jail time. [01:50:29.000 --> 01:50:33.000] Well, they can't put you in jail for a civil offense. [01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:36.000] Correct, but he never did go to jail. [01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:40.000] He never had anything seized. He never had his property seized. [01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:45.000] He was seized. He was seized for them to write the ticket, was he not? [01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:46.000] Correct. [01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:52.000] Okay, and the judge told you it was a civil infraction on the bench, right? [01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:53.000] Correct. [01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:59.000] Then how could you get a notice that you can serve jail time for it when they knew that was a lie? [01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:00.000] Well... [01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:04.000] That's simulation of legal process. [01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:11.000] And we were pretty much in a big learning phase at the time, [01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:14.000] and they really caught us off guard when the judge said, [01:51:14.000 --> 01:51:21.000] I mean, besides that, where does she come up with you can't have a jury trial because it's civil? [01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:24.000] You know, I mean, there was a lot of things that they did wrong. [01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:25.000] Well, that's just it. [01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:33.000] You're guaranteed a jury trial even in the federal Constitution if the issue involves more than $20. [01:51:33.000 --> 01:51:39.000] Right. [01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:43.000] But like I say, at the time, it really caught us off guard. [01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:48.000] Well, I'm hoping this show has managed to change that where you're not so unguarded anymore. [01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:51.000] Well, right. Well, yeah. [01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:54.000] But like I say, that was a couple years ago. [01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:56.000] That was like three years ago. [01:51:56.000 --> 01:51:57.000] Three years ago? [01:51:57.000 --> 01:51:58.000] It was just... [01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:00.000] You came to my seminar in 2009. [01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:04.000] How could you be unprepared if you've been listening ever since then? [01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:06.000] Well, I wasn't the one up in front of the judge. [01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:08.000] It was another guy. [01:52:08.000 --> 01:52:09.000] Yeah. [01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:13.000] Where were you as an advisor, Terry? [01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:17.000] I was sitting behind him, but I wasn't allowed to really talk to him or anything. [01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:19.000] The judge wouldn't let us talk. [01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:23.000] Yeah. With good cause. [01:52:23.000 --> 01:52:24.000] Yeah. [01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:30.000] But we had all the paperwork. [01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:37.000] They got everything on the record, and at that time, we just couldn't figure out how to appeal it. [01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:47.000] We actually went into the records, and I demanded all the records of all the appeals that have been filed to do like Randy says, [01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:50.000] you know, go in and plagiarize, find some good stuff. [01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:58.000] And we couldn't find a single case that had been challenged, that had been appealed. [01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:00.000] That's how many appeals they'd been having. [01:53:00.000 --> 01:53:01.000] Yeah. [01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:02.000] Well, I can say... [01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:04.000] Five years. [01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:09.000] Well, the thing is, you can challenge jurisdiction any time, even years later. [01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:11.000] Well, that's what we're looking at doing. [01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:15.000] I'm trying to talk him into taking it and going back and challenging it now, [01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:21.000] because we're starting to learn more and figure more out. [01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:30.000] Yeah, and tell him, when you take the fight to them, oh, that's a lot more fun. [01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:32.000] Well, I know that. [01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:34.000] I know because I have... [01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:42.000] You know how you're always talking about filing the complaints against the lawyers there. [01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:47.000] And I did that with a prosecutor. [01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:49.000] And I'll tell you what. [01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:53.000] Boy, oh boy, did they change her attitude when I started filing bar agreements. [01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:55.000] It was against the prosecutor. [01:53:55.000 --> 01:54:01.000] She all of a sudden was like my best friend, wanted to do anything I asked her. [01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:02.000] Yeah. [01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:09.000] Well, that's the way it works when you actually show them that you have them over a barrel for a change. [01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:14.000] Yeah, and it was fun. It really was. [01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:15.000] Okay. [01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:16.000] Just be careful. [01:54:16.000 --> 01:54:19.000] There is one big drawback. [01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:20.000] What's that? [01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:23.000] It can become way too much fun. [01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:25.000] Yeah, it's like a drug. [01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:30.000] It's very addictive. [01:54:30.000 --> 01:54:31.000] All right, Terry. [01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:32.000] Anything else? [01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:33.000] Here, both you guys at the same time. [01:54:33.000 --> 01:54:35.000] No, just like here, both you guys at the same time. [01:54:35.000 --> 01:54:36.000] That's a lot of fun, too. [01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:39.000] All right, well, thanks for calling in, Terry. [01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:40.000] Appreciate it. [01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:42.000] All right, you have a good night. [01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:45.000] All right, now we're going to go to Richard in Louisiana. [01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:47.000] Richard, what do you got? [01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:48.000] Yeah, hi, everybody. [01:54:48.000 --> 01:54:53.000] I want some advice in regard to a City of New Orleans parking violation. [01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:55.000] Richard, Richard, hold on. [01:54:55.000 --> 01:54:57.000] Back away from your mic a little bit. [01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:00.000] Your mic is kind of distorting really bad. [01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:02.000] Is it good? [01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:04.000] Yeah, a lot better. [01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:05.000] Yeah, okay. [01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:11.000] I'd like advice on the City of New Orleans parking violation I received on Wednesday, [01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:23.000] March 3, 2016 at 11.15, 51 a.m., which states the officer below being duly sworn upon oath [01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:28.000] and deposes and says that in the City of New Orleans, Louisiana, the vehicle described [01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:34.000] above was observed in violation of the City of New Orleans parking code specified here [01:55:34.000 --> 01:55:39.000] and a copy of the notice was served upon the vehicle as required by law, [01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:47.000] and I was charged with Ordinance Code 154.977, no stopping at any time. [01:55:47.000 --> 01:55:55.000] I am to appear before an administrative hearing, which has a hearing officer, [01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:57.000] which is appointed by the mayor. [01:55:57.000 --> 01:56:01.000] So that's where I stand, and I don't want to pay this ticket. [01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:04.000] Well, again, it's administrative. [01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:10.000] So where is it state law rather than municipal ordinance? [01:56:10.000 --> 01:56:13.000] This all goes to what we've been discussing on the show tonight. [01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:14.000] Yes, sir. [01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:17.000] Does the fact that, and I don't know if it does or doesn't, [01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:20.000] that New Orleans has a home charter rule, does that... [01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:21.000] Doesn't make any difference. [01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:22.000] Who? [01:56:22.000 --> 01:56:23.000] Okay. [01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:25.000] Let me do this. [01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:32.000] You would go a long, long way to helping yourself if you would go read the post on my blog, [01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:36.000] dealing with ordinances and probable cause. [01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:39.000] The blog is Taooflaw. [01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:47.000] T-A-O-F-L-A-W.wordpress.com. [01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:50.000] Go there and read the articles I've got posted up there. [01:56:50.000 --> 01:56:53.000] Learn what an ordinance is and what it isn't. [01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:57.000] Then learn to research your Constitution and your laws [01:56:57.000 --> 01:57:02.000] so that you can make the argument you need to make. [01:57:02.000 --> 01:57:03.000] Wow. [01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:04.000] I have two weeks to do this. [01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:10.000] So I'll call you next Monday and let you know how much more confused I am. [01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:11.000] Okay. [01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:12.000] All right. [01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:13.000] Thank you. [01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:16.000] I was hoping more, but I guess I need to do my homework. [01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:17.000] All right. [01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:20.000] Yeah, it won't do any good to give you information that's over your head [01:57:20.000 --> 01:57:23.000] or you have no way to relate to. [01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:25.000] I've got it all written out. [01:57:25.000 --> 01:57:29.000] If you read it, you'll understand what it is you're missing, I hope. [01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:35.000] And if you don't, then odds are you're fighting a battle you can't hope to win. [01:57:35.000 --> 01:57:37.000] Yeah, that's what I was told by some other people. [01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:38.000] No, no, no. [01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:39.000] Wait, wait, wait. [01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:40.000] You're misunderstanding. [01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:44.000] You're fighting a battle you can't hope to win not because they're right, [01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:48.000] but because you don't know how to fight back. [01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:53.000] And if you can't understand the arguments I've written into these articles, [01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:57.000] then you can't understand how to take them to court and use them. [01:57:57.000 --> 01:57:58.000] You see? [01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:01.000] You're kind of your own worst enemy in that regard. [01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:05.000] You're up against Ali and your hands are tied. [01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:06.000] I understand. [01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:07.000] All right. [01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:08.000] Okay. [01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:09.000] Thank you all. [01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:10.000] I'll get on that right after the show. [01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:11.000] All right. [01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:12.000] Good luck. [01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:13.000] All right, folks. [01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:15.000] This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig [01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:19.000] and my special guest Randy Kelton, who I appreciate being on here very much tonight. [01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:25.000] Maybe that special all-time favorite, greatest, most wonderful. [01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:26.000] Right. [01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:27.000] He is correct. [01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:32.000] My special Ed guest, Randy Kelton, short bus extraordinaire. [01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:35.000] Now, Randy, thanks so much for being on with me tonight. [01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:36.000] Folks, thanks for listening. [01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:41.000] Please keep us in your financial well-being prayers and all your prayers. [01:58:41.000 --> 01:58:50.000] Y'all have a great week, good night, and God bless. [01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:55.000] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called [01:58:55.000 --> 01:58:57.000] the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:57.000 --> 01:59:03.000] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says [01:59:03.000 --> 01:59:08.000] verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:25.000] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:25.000 --> 01:59:30.000] plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:35.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, [01:59:35.000 --> 01:59:40.000] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:40.000 --> 01:59:49.000] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:49.000 --> 01:59:52.000] Looking for some truth? [01:59:52.000 --> 02:00:06.000] You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.