[00:00.000 --> 00:05.840] The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli [00:05.840 --> 00:08.360] bulletins for the commodities market. [00:08.360 --> 00:21.520] Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [00:21.520 --> 00:28.000] Markets for Wednesday, March 9, 2016 are currently trending with gold at $1,252.65 an ounce, [00:28.000 --> 00:34.440] silver at $15.29 an ounce, Texas crude at $36.50 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently [00:34.440 --> 00:42.720] sitting at about $411 U.S. currency. [00:42.720 --> 00:48.280] Today in history, the year 1961, the first animal safely returned from space after completing [00:48.280 --> 00:53.720] one full orbit around the earth in Sputnik 9, a doggie named Ternushka or Blackie returned [00:53.720 --> 00:59.800] from the heavens, today in history. [00:59.800 --> 01:04.000] In recent news, Tayrod Pugh, a U.S. Air Force veteran, was found guilty today of attempting [01:04.000 --> 01:05.700] to join the Islamic State. [01:05.700 --> 01:10.220] After a week-long trial at a Brooklyn federal court, a jury found Tayrod guilty of attempting [01:10.220 --> 01:15.320] to provide material support to ISIS and guilty of obstruction for destroying four e-storage [01:15.320 --> 01:17.120] drives after his detention in Turkey. [01:17.120 --> 01:19.200] Pugh is set to be sentenced in September. [01:19.200 --> 01:23.400] Pugh's defense lawyer is arguing that all he did was express repugnant views about the [01:23.400 --> 01:27.680] Islamic State on Facebook and watched dozens of the group's recruitment videos, and that [01:27.680 --> 01:31.560] he was only traveling to Turkey to find work, not to become a jihadist. [01:31.560 --> 01:36.000] However, prosecutors are presenting a letter he apparently drafted to his Egyptian wife, [01:36.000 --> 01:39.960] which was found on his laptop in which he vowed to fight for Islam. [01:39.960 --> 01:44.800] When detained in Istanbul, he apparently had a black face mask, a map depicting Islamic [01:44.800 --> 01:50.440] State's stronghold in Syria, and a chart of the border crossings between Turkey and Syria. [01:50.440 --> 01:56.080] Pugh served as an avionics specialist in the Air Force from 1986 to 1990, and later worked [01:56.080 --> 02:05.400] as an Army contractor in Iraq from 2009 to 2010. [02:05.400 --> 02:09.320] Toyota recently showed off a new device that could dramatically assist the visually impaired [02:09.320 --> 02:11.120] to better navigate their surroundings. [02:11.120 --> 02:15.240] Call Project Blade an informational device to bridge the gap between a cane or a guide [02:15.240 --> 02:16.240] dog. [02:16.240 --> 02:19.640] Toyota has been testing various prototypes of the wearable device with individuals from [02:19.640 --> 02:23.120] the visually impaired community for the past three years, and though the details of the [02:23.120 --> 02:27.120] project were released this week, no official timeline has been set for the release. [02:27.120 --> 02:31.120] The automaker plans incorporating mapping, object identification, and facial mapping [02:31.120 --> 02:33.720] technologies into Blade in the future. [02:33.720 --> 02:38.680] Doug Moore, manager of partner robotics at Toyota, told ABC that Toyota is thinking about [02:38.680 --> 02:42.080] quality of life for individuals and how to impact society. [02:42.080 --> 02:46.480] To de-loathe our lowdown, as currently looking to build some ad space, if you have a product [02:46.480 --> 02:51.480] or service you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give us a call at 210-363-2257. [02:51.480 --> 02:58.480] This is Rick Roady with your lowdown for March 9th, 2016. [02:58.480 --> 03:24.480] Really, man, come on, 6 o'clock news, says somebody been shot, somebody's been abused, [03:24.480 --> 03:31.480] somebody blew up a building, somebody stole a car, somebody got away, somebody didn't [03:31.480 --> 03:38.480] get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far. [03:38.480 --> 03:46.480] Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day, son, a man had to answer for the ways that he'd [03:46.480 --> 03:53.480] done, take all the rope in Texas by the tall oak tree, round up all of them bad boys, hang [03:53.480 --> 04:02.480] them high on the street, for all the people to see, that justice is the one thing you [04:02.480 --> 04:09.480] should always find, you gotta settle up your boys, you gotta draw a hard line, when the [04:09.480 --> 04:17.480] guns won't settle, we'll sing a victory tune, and we'll all meet back at the local snow, [04:17.480 --> 04:25.480] raise up our glasses against evil forces, singing, west get for my men, bear for my [04:25.480 --> 04:26.480] horses. [04:26.480 --> 04:31.480] All right, folks, good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show, it is [04:31.480 --> 04:36.480] March 21st, 2016. [04:36.480 --> 04:41.480] If we just keep rolling the way we're rolling, that edge of that cliff is coming at us at [04:41.480 --> 04:44.480] a very rapid pace, don't you think? [04:44.480 --> 04:48.480] And just FYI, the phone lines are open if you wish to call in and start getting on the [04:48.480 --> 04:53.480] board, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number. [04:53.480 --> 04:58.480] I just want to go over something very briefly this evening while we're waiting on the caller [04:58.480 --> 05:04.480] board to fill up, and that is understanding where the justice system in America first [05:04.480 --> 05:11.480] went wrong, and actually it's very simple to identify where it first went wrong. [05:11.480 --> 05:17.480] If we look at how the constitutional principles are set up, where the people created the [05:17.480 --> 05:23.480] constitutions, just for the sake of argument, let's go with that thought, that the people [05:23.480 --> 05:31.480] created them, therefore we are superior to them, and we use those constitutions to then [05:31.480 --> 05:40.480] create something that is to operate beneath that constitution, and therefore as an instrument [05:40.480 --> 05:51.480] created by us beneath us, then they are subject to whatever is in it, and in it we said these [05:51.480 --> 05:58.480] are your delegated powers, and these are our rights that are forever removed from your [05:58.480 --> 06:02.480] ability to do any harm to. [06:02.480 --> 06:08.480] You can't legislate against them, you can't opinionate against them, you can't exercise [06:08.480 --> 06:11.480] authority against them. [06:11.480 --> 06:16.480] Remember what are the general powers of the three departments of government? [06:16.480 --> 06:24.480] The legislature's general power is to create law, the judicial branch, their general power [06:24.480 --> 06:31.480] is to interpret the law, and the executive power is to enforce the law. [06:31.480 --> 06:33.480] It's that simple. [06:33.480 --> 06:39.480] So if those are their general powers, and the Bill of Rights that we have is forever [06:39.480 --> 06:45.480] accepted from those general powers, then anything they do in violation of the Bill of Rights [06:45.480 --> 06:48.480] is automatically null and void. [06:48.480 --> 06:55.480] Now this would include how they handle the delegated powers we gave them. [06:55.480 --> 07:03.480] Here is where our judiciary and the attorneys that populate it and the judges that were [07:03.480 --> 07:10.480] created from these attorneys have run afoul of common sense and common application of [07:10.480 --> 07:13.480] constitutional principles. [07:13.480 --> 07:20.480] If we have reserved our Bill of Rights, which none of us have the authority to harm anybody [07:20.480 --> 07:27.480] else's rights, even without a Bill of Rights, we certainly cannot delegate to our lower [07:27.480 --> 07:32.480] level servants the ability to harm somebody else's rights. [07:32.480 --> 07:34.480] We just can't delegate that to them. [07:34.480 --> 07:36.480] We know this. [07:36.480 --> 07:41.480] So that being said, what we're dealing with here is they take the delegated powers, and [07:41.480 --> 07:46.480] this is something the Supreme Court has done in every state, and the United States Supreme [07:46.480 --> 07:53.480] Court has done numerous times, and that is to do things where they expand government [07:53.480 --> 07:56.480] power at the expense of the Bill of Rights. [07:56.480 --> 08:02.480] And what they do is they say that here we have these delegated powers. [08:02.480 --> 08:11.480] So in order to exercise and do our duties under these delegated powers, we have to adversely [08:11.480 --> 08:17.480] affect your rights in order to do what these delegated powers told us to do. [08:17.480 --> 08:24.480] That interpretation is absolutely incorrect. [08:24.480 --> 08:30.480] The proper way to interpret the delegated powers is this. [08:30.480 --> 08:41.480] If you are attempting to exercise a delegated power in a way that conflicts with a protected [08:41.480 --> 08:50.480] right, then you are exercising the delegated power wrong, not the other way around. [08:50.480 --> 08:59.480] The delegated power cannot supersede the individual rights because that right is inherent in the [08:59.480 --> 09:10.480] people as individuals, which we cannot delegate away to you guys in government, in which case [09:10.480 --> 09:19.480] you cannot use that delegated power to harm a superior right. [09:19.480 --> 09:24.480] Now how hard is that for you to understand? [09:24.480 --> 09:31.480] If I gave you the power through power of attorney, let's say, to sell my car because I was going [09:31.480 --> 09:38.480] to be out of town, you cannot turn around and argue that in order to properly exercise [09:38.480 --> 09:47.480] that power to sell my car, which I keep locked in my garage, that that delegated power to [09:47.480 --> 09:55.480] sell that car allows you to sell the house because the car is in the garage. [09:55.480 --> 10:01.480] Yet that is exactly what the government and the courts have attempted to do with the delegated [10:01.480 --> 10:03.480] powers. [10:03.480 --> 10:08.480] They have tried to say that you gave us these duties and we have to infringe upon your rights [10:08.480 --> 10:09.480] to do these duties. [10:09.480 --> 10:11.480] Wrong. [10:11.480 --> 10:17.480] That means you are doing something with those delegated powers that you're forbidden to [10:17.480 --> 10:25.480] do because you have a conflict of interpretation forever removed from the general powers of [10:25.480 --> 10:26.480] government. [10:26.480 --> 10:34.480] Right there says you cannot take that delegated power and affect that right with it. [10:34.480 --> 10:38.480] Can't do it. [10:38.480 --> 10:46.480] This, ladies and gentlemen, is the problem with allowing attorneys to control every aspect [10:46.480 --> 10:48.480] of government. [10:48.480 --> 10:51.480] And that's what we've allowed to happen in this country. [10:51.480 --> 10:56.480] This is why this country is in such a big mess because we have allowed a constitutional [10:56.480 --> 11:02.480] violation to grow like a cancer in the midst of America. [11:02.480 --> 11:07.480] And that is an aristocracy in the attorney class. [11:07.480 --> 11:13.480] They have gotten all of the jobs that control all parts of government and made it where [11:13.480 --> 11:18.480] they're the only ones that can occupy them. [11:18.480 --> 11:24.480] And through that occupation have colluded through the individual departments of government [11:24.480 --> 11:33.480] to deprive us of every constitutional protection and every reservation of rights that we have [11:33.480 --> 11:37.480] to limit what they can do. [11:37.480 --> 11:44.480] Now, if you doubt that, it's a very easy thing for you to verify that I'm right. [11:44.480 --> 11:52.480] Take any situation you desire in America and I guarantee you, you will be able to trace [11:52.480 --> 11:56.480] it back to an attorney. [11:56.480 --> 12:01.480] Every problem we have is the result of some law. [12:01.480 --> 12:06.480] Every law we have was created by some attorney. [12:06.480 --> 12:10.480] Now, some legislator may have sponsored it that isn't an attorney, though we have very [12:10.480 --> 12:14.480] few of those left anymore these days. [12:14.480 --> 12:21.480] But even so, everything goes through attorneys before it gets approved for anything. [12:21.480 --> 12:24.480] It gets reworded, it gets reworked, it gets resubmitted. [12:24.480 --> 12:26.480] Attorneys are doing all of it. [12:26.480 --> 12:31.480] Attorneys have made it where they are the only ones that can occupy the judicial department [12:31.480 --> 12:33.480] of government when it comes to courts of record. [12:33.480 --> 12:35.480] Did you know that? [12:35.480 --> 12:40.480] Here in Texas, you cannot be a judge, an elected judge. [12:40.480 --> 12:45.480] This is an elected constitutional office. [12:45.480 --> 12:51.480] And the attorneys that have control of the legislator have passed laws to ensure that [12:51.480 --> 13:00.480] no one except another attorney can sit as an elected judge in these courts. [13:00.480 --> 13:02.480] Now, how is that possible? [13:02.480 --> 13:09.480] How is it a constitutional office if the only way to get it is through statute and the statute [13:09.480 --> 13:15.480] has been limited to a particular class of individuals who have proven themselves to [13:15.480 --> 13:27.480] be inept, corrupt, immoral, and completely statist in what they do? [13:27.480 --> 13:35.480] Everything can be traced back to this, everything. [13:35.480 --> 13:41.480] This is exactly the reason why the original 13th Amendment to the federal Constitution [13:41.480 --> 13:48.480] was written to prevent where we are right now. [13:48.480 --> 13:53.480] That original 13th Amendment made it very clear that no one with a title of nobility [13:53.480 --> 13:58.480] could be a government official. [13:58.480 --> 14:00.480] They could not serve in public office. [14:00.480 --> 14:03.480] Now, everybody wants to say that Esquire is a title of nobility. [14:03.480 --> 14:06.480] I'm not buying into that. [14:06.480 --> 14:14.480] But when they start giving themselves titles like Your Honor and so on and so forth, [14:14.480 --> 14:22.480] and then making demands that you honor them in their hubris when they walk into a courtroom, [14:22.480 --> 14:29.480] somehow or other these people think they're above us instead of working for us. [14:29.480 --> 14:37.480] I got news for you, ladies and gentlemen, there is no requirement for you to stand for a judge [14:37.480 --> 14:39.480] when they enter or exit a courtroom. [14:39.480 --> 14:45.480] I don't care what a bailiff tells you or threatens you with. [14:45.480 --> 14:50.480] Now, in my Christian upbringing, I've been taught we don't pay homage to men. [14:50.480 --> 14:52.480] We don't do it. [14:52.480 --> 14:57.480] But that is what these judges coming into and out of these courtrooms are expecting you to do, [14:57.480 --> 15:04.480] pay homage to them, rise up, honor us for walking in here so we can steal from you [15:04.480 --> 15:09.480] under the guise of some authority that you didn't really give me, [15:09.480 --> 15:13.480] but I'm going to exercise anyway. [15:13.480 --> 15:17.480] That's what we're talking about here. [15:17.480 --> 15:25.480] Every problem, and I mean every problem, short of gross stupidity, [15:25.480 --> 15:32.480] can be traced back to a lawyer who created a law that was meant to do nothing more [15:32.480 --> 15:37.480] than provide income for attorneys. [15:37.480 --> 15:42.480] Every malum prohibitum law that we have that's being used against the public unconstitutionally [15:42.480 --> 15:45.480] and illegally is not there for the public health and welfare. [15:45.480 --> 15:47.480] It's there for revenue generation. [15:47.480 --> 15:51.480] It's there to create a conflict instead of resolve them. [15:51.480 --> 15:59.480] It is there to ensure that in order to navigate the waters of the legal system, [15:59.480 --> 16:01.480] you have to hire an attorney. [16:01.480 --> 16:11.480] And when you won't hire an attorney, then you are fed to the sharks in that system. [16:11.480 --> 16:15.480] Even if you know what you're doing, even if you know how to do it, [16:15.480 --> 16:20.480] you will have an uphill battle to win, even if you're right, [16:20.480 --> 16:26.480] because they don't like having to admit that they are more incompetent and inept [16:26.480 --> 16:29.480] than the general public is in many ways, [16:29.480 --> 16:32.480] especially when it comes to understanding individual rights [16:32.480 --> 16:37.480] or caring about individual rights. [16:37.480 --> 16:40.480] So folks, I want you to keep that in mind. [16:40.480 --> 16:48.480] Our problem with society starts with attorneys, and it ends with attorneys. [16:48.480 --> 16:51.480] We need to get out from under this aristocracy [16:51.480 --> 16:55.480] and back into a society of free people, freely associating. [16:55.480 --> 16:57.480] We'll be right back. [16:57.480 --> 17:21.480] Y'all hang on. [17:27.480 --> 17:54.480] We'll be right back. [17:54.480 --> 18:00.480] We'll be right back. [18:24.480 --> 18:27.480] We'll be right back. [18:55.480 --> 18:59.480] We'll be right back. [18:59.480 --> 19:09.480] We'll be right back. [19:09.480 --> 19:37.480] Look what we got, we asked the question, we don't know what to hide, we don't have the answer, we asked the question. [19:37.480 --> 19:42.480] Look what we got, we asked the question, we don't know what to hide, we asked the question. [20:08.480 --> 20:18.480] and you're not local where you can tune in on the actual radio, please use a computer or your cell phone internet connection or something of that sort and stream it over the internet. [20:18.480 --> 20:34.480] Streams are what we need anyway as much as possible because that's what big studios and financiers and supporters and things like that look for is how popular an internet show is. [20:34.480 --> 20:38.480] And they can only do that if we can show them stream information. [20:38.480 --> 20:44.480] So if you can, please listen to us online as much and as often as possible. [20:44.480 --> 20:54.480] All right, that being said, looks like this caller is Neelan. I don't know where he's from. Neelan, what can we do for you? Where are you calling from? [20:54.480 --> 20:56.480] North Carolina, sir. [20:56.480 --> 20:58.480] North Carolina. All right, what do you got? [20:58.480 --> 21:07.480] Yes, sir. How are you, Eddie? I've been listening to you for a while. I've been actually going over and over and over your transportation script and everything. [21:07.480 --> 21:16.480] I didn't get a chance to get to it before my last endeavor with the police in Catawba County. [21:16.480 --> 21:22.480] I was pulled over for a routine traffic stop, a regular traffic checkpoint or a license checkpoint. [21:22.480 --> 21:34.480] And I've got in my back window of my vehicle, I'm sorry, in the back of my conveyance, my personal property, I've got in the window, it says not for hire. [21:34.480 --> 21:38.480] Clearly, it's right there in black and white. [21:38.480 --> 21:39.480] Okay. [21:39.480 --> 21:45.480] The police stopped me. They asked me for my driver's license. I said, well, I'm not operating under commerce. [21:45.480 --> 21:56.480] I'm not doing anything that requires me to have a license. So he asked me to pull over into their little secondary or whatever. [21:56.480 --> 22:09.480] And I'm complying with him. I got off the road, got out of the way of traffic and pulled off to the side of the road and did what you said, just let my window down two inches or so. [22:09.480 --> 22:15.480] And I just got done with a 14-hour shift at work. Okay. [22:15.480 --> 22:16.480] Okay. [22:16.480 --> 22:22.480] I'm a demolition carpenter. I do remodeling and that kind of stuff. [22:22.480 --> 22:25.480] Oh, I thought you were going to tell me you got to blow crap up, but okay. [22:25.480 --> 22:33.480] No, I don't. No, I'm thinking about it though. No, I'm kidding. I can't say that out loud. That's not good. [22:33.480 --> 22:40.480] But anyway, no, they escalated this stuff like you were talking about. They couldn't get anything from me because I invoked my rights. [22:40.480 --> 22:45.480] I told them that I'm not going to give you guys anything that's going to incriminate me. [22:45.480 --> 22:52.480] And after I told them that I'm not operating in commerce, they kept on trying and pushing and pushing and pushing. [22:52.480 --> 22:55.480] They were shining their flashlights all in the back of my van. [22:55.480 --> 23:03.480] I had a bunch of stuff in my van that was going through a scrapyard the following day so I could supplement my income. [23:03.480 --> 23:09.480] I had a bag full of beer cans and soda cans. [23:09.480 --> 23:16.480] And they started talking about, even though I only had that one window open, they started talking about, well, we smell alcohol. [23:16.480 --> 23:26.480] And their reason for breaking my window eventually, it took them about, I'm going to say probably 45 minutes into this stop of detaining me. [23:26.480 --> 23:32.480] After they couldn't get anything else from me, they started talking about they could smell the alcohol. [23:32.480 --> 23:38.480] They were looking at the beer can labels right through the bag. You could see right through the bag. It was a clear plastic bag. [23:38.480 --> 23:42.480] But they started talking about they could smell beer, blah, blah, blah. [23:42.480 --> 23:48.480] And my eyes were looking glossy. So that was their probable cause. [23:48.480 --> 23:51.480] No warrants were issued. They didn't have any warrants or anything like that. [23:51.480 --> 23:57.480] There was no prime committed. And nobody was harmed in this process except for me. [23:57.480 --> 24:04.480] They busted my window, dragged me out of my van through the glass, and they locked me out for three months, [24:04.480 --> 24:10.480] thinking that they're going to change my mind about how these things are supposed to work. [24:10.480 --> 24:12.480] I've been watching Carl Miller. [24:12.480 --> 24:15.480] What do you mean they locked you up for three months? [24:15.480 --> 24:17.480] Three months, man. [24:17.480 --> 24:23.480] Well, OK, we're missing something here. The cops arrested you, correct? [24:23.480 --> 24:24.480] Yep. [24:24.480 --> 24:26.480] You went to trial, correct? [24:26.480 --> 24:30.480] No, no, no, no. It's still open. That case is still open. [24:30.480 --> 24:33.480] Then how did you spend three months in jail? [24:33.480 --> 24:40.480] Dry. Good point. Good point. My point exactly. Due process violation all the way around, man. [24:40.480 --> 24:47.480] You're exactly right. And I could really use some help with this because I'm a flat broke joker right now. [24:47.480 --> 24:52.480] This driver's license issue has been going on with me for 15 years. [24:52.480 --> 24:58.480] I turned myself in twice over the same charge that they're claiming is still out there, outstanding. [24:58.480 --> 25:01.480] That is what is holding up my driver's privileges. [25:01.480 --> 25:07.480] You know what? Since they have revoked me, my right reverts back to the common law and I know that I have the right. [25:07.480 --> 25:10.480] OK, wait, wait, wait, wait. We're not in a legal debate here. [25:10.480 --> 25:13.480] Do you have a question about any of this? [25:13.480 --> 25:14.480] Oh, yeah. [25:14.480 --> 25:17.480] OK, what's the question? [25:17.480 --> 25:25.480] OK, right. In the position that I'm in right now, how do I go about, OK, I've got to stop. [25:25.480 --> 25:29.480] This case is still open, the driver while impaired. Here's what they did. [25:29.480 --> 25:36.480] OK, wait a minute. What evidence, what evidence did they accumulate to prove driving while impaired? [25:36.480 --> 25:42.480] Zero. I gave them no roadside test, no urine, no blood. [25:42.480 --> 25:48.480] And when I went in front of the magistrate, get this, I went in front of the magistrate. [25:48.480 --> 25:53.480] How long before you went in front of the magistrate from the time they pulled you out of your car? [25:53.480 --> 25:57.480] It was probably about two hours, two and a half hours. [25:57.480 --> 25:58.480] OK. [25:58.480 --> 26:02.480] OK, so I go in front of the magistrate and hopefully there was cameras on. [26:02.480 --> 26:09.480] I'm trying to get those records brought into the record, into the record. I want that there. [26:09.480 --> 26:14.480] They had me try to, they tried to get me to sign an implied consent form. [26:14.480 --> 26:22.480] OK, and as I was doing that, I wrote UD 1-207 without prejudice on the first form. [26:22.480 --> 26:25.480] What is UD 1-207? [26:25.480 --> 26:32.480] Under duress, 1-207, meaning I'm not, I'm not saying this because, [26:32.480 --> 26:40.480] because I agree to what's in the contents of this document, but I'm only doing it because you guys are making me. [26:40.480 --> 26:42.480] OK, still invoking my rights. [26:42.480 --> 26:47.480] Do you realize 1-207 is now 1-308, right? [26:47.480 --> 26:57.480] Yes, it's both. I mean, as far as Carl Miller told me the 207, but anyway, 207-308, you know, I mean, I think they go pretty much hand in hand. [26:57.480 --> 27:04.480] No, they've changed it is my point. They don't go hand in hand. 207 became 308. [27:04.480 --> 27:13.480] Oh, OK. OK, but anyway, this was my understanding and so with. [27:13.480 --> 27:17.480] Hello. [27:17.480 --> 27:22.480] And he drops. OK, no, folks, that was not me. [27:22.480 --> 27:26.480] Honest to goodness, I didn't cut him off. He just disconnected. [27:26.480 --> 27:29.480] OK, well, I got two and a half minutes. [27:29.480 --> 27:33.480] So while we're waiting on him to reconnect, I'm going to take Jeff in Mississippi. [27:33.480 --> 27:38.480] Jeff, what do you got? I got two and a half minutes, which means I can give you two. [27:38.480 --> 27:43.480] Hey, Eddie, thanks for having me on the show. Yes, sir. [27:43.480 --> 27:48.480] And I have got a form. It's called a conference form. [27:48.480 --> 27:59.480] They want to have a conference and they want parties to agree to rule 26 for my Title 42 federal suit. [27:59.480 --> 28:10.480] So the opposing attorney has sent me a form in which both parties fill out or sign, I'm sorry, sign and it's a scheduling form. [28:10.480 --> 28:15.480] And so far, the form has nothing but dates on it. [28:15.480 --> 28:25.480] There doesn't seem to be anything suspicious, but he asked me to sign it over email using italics and then just to shoot it back to him. [28:25.480 --> 28:27.480] What is your experience on that? [28:27.480 --> 28:30.480] I don't know. What is rule 26? [28:30.480 --> 28:41.480] Rule 26 is the scheduling orders for people to have conferences and to get all their discoveries and stuff, to talk about a timetable. [28:41.480 --> 28:45.480] And it's mandatory, or at least it is in my case. [28:45.480 --> 28:50.480] So I have to get with the attorney and have a conference, which is a telephone conference. [28:50.480 --> 28:51.480] Well, that's generally the way they do it. [28:51.480 --> 29:00.480] The federal courts, they hate to adjudicate cases if they can make you resolve it before ever getting it to the court. [29:00.480 --> 29:09.480] It's basically a bunch of lazy, fat old men and or women that don't want to do their job if you are going to come in and argue about stuff. [29:09.480 --> 29:11.480] That's the whole point, right? [29:11.480 --> 29:20.480] So, yeah, they pretty much force everyone down this path to minimize the number of cases that aren't settled before they get to court. [29:20.480 --> 29:23.480] Well, this form is more on a timetable. [29:23.480 --> 29:25.480] Trial is set for December. [29:25.480 --> 29:30.480] Do parties agree to have all discovery in by 90 days before? [29:30.480 --> 29:34.480] And by May 14th, this is done, and June 12th, this is done? [29:34.480 --> 29:36.480] That's right. [29:36.480 --> 29:41.480] I will sign that if it's okay and I'll send it back to them. [29:41.480 --> 29:43.480] Well, that's just it. [29:43.480 --> 29:51.480] Have you put in discovery and they've replied to it? Do you think you can get the discovery by that timeframe and so on and so forth? [29:51.480 --> 29:54.480] Hang on and we'll finish this on the other side of this break, okay? [29:54.480 --> 29:55.480] Okay. [29:55.480 --> 30:01.480] All right, folks, 512-646-1984. [30:01.480 --> 30:10.480] Here in the U.S., you can name your child pretty much anything you want, but creative naming and weird spelling won't fly in other parts of the world. [30:10.480 --> 30:15.480] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with some surprising lies about baby names. [30:15.480 --> 30:17.480] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.480 --> 30:21.480] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:21.480 --> 30:26.480] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:26.480 --> 30:27.480] So protect your rights. [30:27.480 --> 30:31.480] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:31.480 --> 30:33.480] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.480 --> 30:37.480] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [30:37.480 --> 30:41.480] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:41.480 --> 30:44.480] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.480 --> 30:46.480] Is it a girl or a boy? [30:46.480 --> 30:50.480] In Denmark and Germany, you should be able to tell by the baby's name. [30:50.480 --> 30:51.480] It's the law. [30:51.480 --> 30:56.480] For example, the name Matty is verboten in Germany because it could cause gender confusion. [30:56.480 --> 31:00.480] Several countries won't allow names considered harmful to a child's self-image. [31:00.480 --> 31:05.480] The names Adolf Hitler and Satan are banned in New Zealand, which might be understandable. [31:05.480 --> 31:10.480] But fans of the king of rock and roll might wonder why the name Elvis has been rejected in Sweden. [31:10.480 --> 31:16.480] What's not surprising is that Chinese baby naming laws reflect the country's control agenda. [31:16.480 --> 31:23.480] Parents must give newborns names that can be easily scanned by a computer for the country's national ID card program. [31:23.480 --> 31:25.480] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [31:25.480 --> 31:35.480] For more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:55.480 --> 32:02.480] Call 888-910-4367 only at nusa.org. [32:02.480 --> 32:05.480] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [32:05.480 --> 32:07.480] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [32:07.480 --> 32:09.480] And if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [32:09.480 --> 32:12.480] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:12.480 --> 32:15.480] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [32:15.480 --> 32:19.480] the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:19.480 --> 32:25.480] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:25.480 --> 32:28.480] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:28.480 --> 32:33.480] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is [32:33.480 --> 32:35.480] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:35.480 --> 32:40.480] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:40.480 --> 32:45.480] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [32:45.480 --> 32:50.480] and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:50.480 --> 32:54.480] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:54.480 --> 32:59.480] Order your copy today, and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve. [32:59.480 --> 33:02.480] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:29.480 --> 33:49.480] Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking with Jeff in Mississippi. [33:49.480 --> 33:56.480] Okay, yeah, as I was saying, if you are sure that you can get all of your discovery and everything met by that deadline, [33:56.480 --> 34:00.480] then go ahead and sign it, if that's all that they're telling you it's for, [34:00.480 --> 34:04.480] just to get deadlines established that everyone's supposed to meet. [34:04.480 --> 34:08.480] Okay, and I can sign it over the email and send it back to them? [34:08.480 --> 34:13.480] Whatever criteria they said you could sign it by. I don't know whether that's acceptable or not. [34:13.480 --> 34:19.480] If they told you it was, then I would presume so. If you don't know, then I would call and ask or look. [34:19.480 --> 34:28.480] Okay, that's fine. The second thing is when they responded to my complaint with the motion 12B6, [34:28.480 --> 34:36.480] it was dismissed, and in one of the paragraphs, the attorney completely lies through his teeth. [34:36.480 --> 34:42.480] In your response, you need to address that to the judge and ask for sanctions for a blatant misrepresentation [34:42.480 --> 34:46.480] of the law and the facts to the court with the intent to perpetrate fraud upon the court [34:46.480 --> 34:50.480] and deny due process to you as the plaintiff. [34:50.480 --> 34:52.480] Do I do this when I'm in front of the judge? [34:52.480 --> 34:58.480] You do this in your answer. You should have done this in your answer. [34:58.480 --> 35:06.480] Okay, well, I already answered, and what I did was I said in the answer that the attorney made a fraudulent statement. [35:06.480 --> 35:11.480] But did you define what that means? [35:11.480 --> 35:14.480] Yes, I said paragraph three, blah, blah, blah. [35:14.480 --> 35:17.480] And you spelled out why it was false? [35:17.480 --> 35:18.480] Yes. [35:18.480 --> 35:21.480] Okay, then you did what I said. You addressed it in your answer, [35:21.480 --> 35:26.480] but you want to raise it verbally on the record in open court as well. [35:26.480 --> 35:30.480] That we need sanctions against this guy right now. [35:30.480 --> 35:35.480] You can say, Judge, I would like to move the court for sanctions against the prosecution relating to the item in my response [35:35.480 --> 35:40.480] where I detailed that he perpetrated a knowing and willful fraudulent statement to this court [35:40.480 --> 35:46.480] regarding the facts and issues in this paragraph of this motion, blah, blah, blah. [35:46.480 --> 35:49.480] Okay. Got it. Okay. [35:49.480 --> 35:55.480] See, this is something they won't do to each other. You have the benefit of not being in that club. [35:55.480 --> 35:59.480] True. Okay. [35:59.480 --> 36:02.480] Okay, that's one of the reasons why me and attorneys don't see eye to eye, [36:02.480 --> 36:05.480] because I have absolutely no problem with peeing in their pool. [36:05.480 --> 36:12.480] Uh-huh. [36:12.480 --> 36:14.480] That is nice. [36:14.480 --> 36:16.480] Okay. Well, those are the only two questions. [36:16.480 --> 36:19.480] I certainly appreciate it, and I will get right on that. [36:19.480 --> 36:21.480] All right, Jeff. Good luck. [36:21.480 --> 36:22.480] Okay. Thank you. [36:22.480 --> 36:23.480] All right. Bye-bye. [36:23.480 --> 36:27.480] All right. Now, let's see if we can keep Neelan on the line here again. [36:27.480 --> 36:28.480] Neelan, are you back? [36:28.480 --> 36:29.480] Yes, sir. [36:29.480 --> 36:30.480] All right. Rick. [36:30.480 --> 36:31.480] Yes, sir. [36:31.480 --> 36:36.480] Rick, okay. I'm sorry, Rick. I don't know how they've got this arranged up on the caller board. [36:36.480 --> 36:38.480] That's all good. Not a problem. [36:38.480 --> 36:41.480] Hey, listen, I've got a big question here for you. [36:41.480 --> 36:42.480] Okay. [36:42.480 --> 36:45.480] Like I said, I did that three months in jail, okay? [36:45.480 --> 36:51.480] I've got a public pretender that got me out on an unsecured bond, okay? [36:51.480 --> 36:58.480] And I'm awaiting my trial that's supposed to start on the 11th of this month in Catawba County, North Carolina. [36:58.480 --> 37:05.480] And what I want to know is this guy is acting like he doesn't understand anything about this transportation code. [37:05.480 --> 37:10.480] You know, he doesn't understand a thing about none of this stuff that I'm talking about to him. [37:10.480 --> 37:16.480] And he may not. But then again, he may also be playing willfully ignorant. [37:16.480 --> 37:19.480] Right, right, right, right. Okay. All right. [37:19.480 --> 37:24.480] So what do I do if this guy flubs my case? I mean, if he flubs my case, I'm... [37:24.480 --> 37:30.480] Well, you sue him for malpractice is what you do, but you'd better be able to prove that he did that. [37:30.480 --> 37:37.480] See, it's one thing to know the truth. It's another thing to be able to prove it on the record in court. [37:37.480 --> 37:41.480] And it's going to be hard to do that because he's still playing ignorant. [37:41.480 --> 37:45.480] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. I wasn't talking about him. I was talking about you. [37:45.480 --> 37:49.480] If he screws this up, you have to sue him for malpractice. [37:49.480 --> 37:54.480] But in order to win that malpractice, you have to prove that he could have known [37:54.480 --> 37:58.480] and should have known that the charges against you were fraudulent [37:58.480 --> 38:05.480] because you were not engaging in an activity which required you to comply with the law surrounding that activity. [38:05.480 --> 38:08.480] I don't want to watch your video. I don't want to watch your video. [38:08.480 --> 38:15.480] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. My video is not admissible evidence of South Carolina law. [38:15.480 --> 38:19.480] Does that not? No, it's not. [38:19.480 --> 38:28.480] How would my video on Texas Transportation's Code be admissible evidence on South Carolina's code? [38:28.480 --> 38:30.480] No, it's not North Carolina. [38:30.480 --> 38:37.480] Well, North Carolina, any Carolina, BFE Carolina, it's not admissible evidence for that. [38:37.480 --> 38:43.480] You still have to go to the law of your state. And I say that very clearly in the video. [38:43.480 --> 38:48.480] You will find that most of the state laws will be very similar. [38:48.480 --> 38:53.480] But you need to find out which ones match up with which facts. [38:53.480 --> 38:57.480] And I even did an article on my blog about how to do that. [38:57.480 --> 39:00.480] Right, right. I'm not trying to—I'm not shooting the messenger. [39:00.480 --> 39:05.480] No, no, I know that. I'm just trying to make it clear to folks out there how this works. [39:05.480 --> 39:10.480] I've got too many people calling me and say, I saw your video and I went and did this. [39:10.480 --> 39:13.480] Well, what state do you live in? Oh, I'm in Maine. [39:13.480 --> 39:19.480] What the hell are you doing this in Maine for if you haven't studied any of the Maine laws on the subject? [39:19.480 --> 39:21.480] See, that's the problem. [39:21.480 --> 39:22.480] Okay. [39:22.480 --> 39:31.480] Everybody treats my video like I've given them a golden key instead of simple information to help them find their own key. [39:31.480 --> 39:34.480] Their own information, yeah. Yeah, they got to get their own key. You're right. [39:34.480 --> 39:38.480] Yes, absolutely. Okay, I'm still looking for—I'm looking for the keys. [39:38.480 --> 39:54.480] Okay, on my blog site, toweloflaw.wordpress.com, I did an article on how to research the actual bill, [39:54.480 --> 40:01.480] the session bill passed by the legislature to identify what the subject matter is that it dealt with. [40:01.480 --> 40:07.480] So you will know what the subject matter, the statutory scheme, is limited to. [40:07.480 --> 40:14.480] The statutes cannot supersede the underlying law. They're not the law. [40:14.480 --> 40:22.480] Right, exactly. And that's just like the Supreme Court rulings are just under the Constitution, correct? [40:22.480 --> 40:27.480] I mean, but they support the Constitution, but they cannot stretch the instrument beyond its means. [40:27.480 --> 40:31.480] Well, they don't stretch it. They rip it to shreds a lot of times. [40:31.480 --> 40:32.480] Yeah, I get you. [40:32.480 --> 40:40.480] Okay, but here's the problem. Everybody acts like the federal Constitution is the only Constitution, too, and it's not. [40:40.480 --> 40:47.480] So when the Supreme Court says the federal Constitution doesn't offer a protection for something to the people, [40:47.480 --> 40:52.480] that does not mean that their individual state Constitution does not. [40:52.480 --> 40:56.480] Right, right. We're still under the common law here in North Carolina. [40:56.480 --> 41:03.480] We're under the common law in every state. The difference is, is what they're calling common law in the states. [41:03.480 --> 41:09.480] Right, right. Okay. And so I have to read up on what that means. Okay. [41:09.480 --> 41:16.480] All right. So with me being locked up for that three months, I mean, do you see anything wrong with what they did to me on that? [41:16.480 --> 41:24.480] I mean, with that routine driver's license checkpoint where I invoked my license and said I'm not going to give you any documents, [41:24.480 --> 41:31.480] nothing that's going to incriminate myself. They pushed me to the point where they busted my window and dragged me out of my car, [41:31.480 --> 41:38.480] and then they got my ID from me and came up with some charges that were 15 years old, some misdemeanor shit. [41:38.480 --> 41:41.480] All right. Careful with the language. [41:41.480 --> 41:42.480] Sorry. [41:42.480 --> 41:45.480] If Debra will ban you, you keep doing that. [41:45.480 --> 41:47.480] I'm sorry about that. [41:47.480 --> 41:54.480] In any case, you're still talking about two different things here. You're talking about defending yourself from their allegations [41:54.480 --> 42:01.480] versus suing them for interfering with your rights under false allegations. There are two separate issues here. [42:01.480 --> 42:07.480] Right, right, right. I've got that in the works. The suit is coming soon after this case is dismissed. [42:07.480 --> 42:12.480] Okay. That's well and good if you know what the suit is you're bringing. Okay. [42:12.480 --> 42:19.480] Everybody wants to go and argue right to travel in this. This was never about a right to travel. [42:19.480 --> 42:21.480] I've got liberty. [42:21.480 --> 42:24.480] Wait a minute. You've got a completely different issue. [42:24.480 --> 42:30.480] Your issue is the three-month incarceration without ever being adjudicated guilty of anything. [42:30.480 --> 42:32.480] Okay. [42:32.480 --> 42:41.480] Okay. The thing is, it would also depend upon what level of offenses they're trying to hit you with as to whether or not they're going to get away with that. [42:41.480 --> 42:53.480] If these were Class C fine-onlys in North Carolina, then incarceration was never a valid part of the punishment. [42:53.480 --> 43:02.480] If they were any other level of misdemeanor where they could incarcerate you, then that becomes another issue you need to look at. [43:02.480 --> 43:04.480] But still, without— [43:04.480 --> 43:11.480] Explain that a little further, please. Eddie, I don't mean to sound like a dummy, but I am a dummy. You know what I mean when it comes to this. [43:11.480 --> 43:17.480] If you can clear up what you're saying, put it in with simple layman's terms, because that's what I am. [43:17.480 --> 43:22.480] I thought I was doing that, but let's try this again. If they're charging you with a felony— [43:22.480 --> 43:24.480] Wait a minute. [43:24.480 --> 43:44.480] Okay. If they're charging you with a felony, holding you in jail for three months to get ready for prosecuting you on that, it's not going to be as big a deal for you to claim a rights violation as it would be if this was a Class C fine-only for which they couldn't throw you in jail, even if you're guilty. [43:44.480 --> 43:47.480] Okay. Now, with it being the— [43:47.480 --> 43:53.480] All right. Hold on, Richard. Rick, I got to take a break here. We'll get to this on the other side. [43:53.480 --> 43:59.480] All right, folks. 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. [44:23.480 --> 44:27.480] This is one with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [44:27.480 --> 44:33.480] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:33.480 --> 44:42.480] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:42.480 --> 44:51.480] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [44:51.480 --> 45:00.480] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [45:00.480 --> 45:13.480] Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas, [45:13.480 --> 45:18.480] buying Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [45:18.480 --> 45:23.480] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [45:23.480 --> 45:31.480] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [45:31.480 --> 45:44.480] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. [45:44.480 --> 45:50.480] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com. [46:14.480 --> 46:36.480] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984, and we are still talking with Rick in North Carolina. [46:36.480 --> 46:48.480] All right, Rick, go ahead. All right, now, okay, on the criminal side, from the criminal aspect of this, I should not settle for any less than a dismissal. [46:48.480 --> 46:57.480] In fact, shouldn't I be able to get from the courts a suppression of the evidence based on... [46:57.480 --> 47:05.480] Well, I don't know what all the evidence is, and I haven't seen what transpired at the time, so I can't answer that. [47:05.480 --> 47:13.480] You should try to get it done, of course, but whether or not you should get it or will get it, that I can't answer. [47:13.480 --> 47:28.480] All right, okay, he said he's going to try to do that based on whether they gave notification, based on the length of time they had me detained, you know, prior to the arrest and that type of thing. [47:28.480 --> 47:37.480] But like I said, when an officer approached me, I've got, not for hire, right on the back of my van, right there in plain sight, you know. [47:37.480 --> 47:44.480] And then I continued to tell him that I'm not involved in commerce or transportation, any of those regular activities, blah, blah, blah. [47:44.480 --> 47:47.480] But they wanted to keep pressing, pressing, pressing. [47:47.480 --> 47:55.480] And, you know, when they did that, they did what you said, and they escalated it to something more severe than just the traffic stop. [47:55.480 --> 48:04.480] And then the next thing you know, they're trying to tell me that I impeded the police investigation, blah, blah, blah, gave me a through ticket at me for that. [48:04.480 --> 48:09.480] I've got like five different charges looking at me, you know what I mean, out of that one stop. [48:09.480 --> 48:17.480] Failure to register, failure to have an inspection, failure to have insurance, blah, blah, blah, all this stuff, you know. [48:17.480 --> 48:21.480] No accident involved, nothing, you know what I mean. [48:21.480 --> 48:30.480] Like I said, never tested, I didn't do a urine sample, didn't do a roadside, what do you call it, sobriety test, none of that stuff. [48:30.480 --> 48:40.480] And then when I went to sign the implied consent and signed under duress, regardless whether I got the numbers right or not, I signed it under duress, okay. [48:40.480 --> 48:46.480] I didn't know that they had changed it to the 308, but now that I do, I'll keep that in mind. [48:46.480 --> 48:49.480] But I did clearly sign it under duress, okay. [48:49.480 --> 48:57.480] And the cop just ripped it right out of my hand, you know, in front of the magistrate, no less, right there in front of the magistrate. [48:57.480 --> 49:04.480] And then I got locked up, and then I did the three months in jail, and then my court appointed... [49:04.480 --> 49:09.480] Okay, I still haven't heard how you wound up in jail. [49:09.480 --> 49:10.480] How? [49:10.480 --> 49:16.480] Without ever going to court and having a trial, how you wound up in jail for three months. [49:16.480 --> 49:18.480] That's what they did to me, that's what they did. [49:18.480 --> 49:19.480] Okay. [49:19.480 --> 49:23.480] I'm still awaiting the trial, still waiting. [49:23.480 --> 49:26.480] So you tell me what I'm supposed to do, what should I do? [49:26.480 --> 49:32.480] I mean, I don't know how they got away with it, or if they did, I don't think they did get away with it. [49:32.480 --> 49:35.480] Did they set a bond that you had to pay to get out? [49:35.480 --> 49:36.480] Yes. [49:36.480 --> 49:40.480] And you didn't pay it, or you didn't get a bail bondsman to pay it? [49:40.480 --> 49:41.480] Couldn't pay it. [49:41.480 --> 49:47.480] And they had too many FTAs out on me because of those previous charges that they came up with. [49:47.480 --> 49:51.480] I thought I had answered all my charges in North Carolina, but they had charges from [49:51.480 --> 49:56.480] 15 years ago, just stupid nearest to meaner stuff, you know what I mean? [49:56.480 --> 49:59.480] And they... [49:59.480 --> 50:05.480] But they had me held at that jail, that particular jail where they arrested me. [50:05.480 --> 50:14.480] They had me held there for that three-month period of time on those charges, and not until [50:14.480 --> 50:24.480] those charges were placed under an unsecured bond was I able to go take care of the other [50:24.480 --> 50:30.480] charges that were from 15 years ago that they ended up dismissing one after another. [50:30.480 --> 50:32.480] You know what I mean? [50:32.480 --> 50:34.480] Okay. [50:34.480 --> 50:42.480] So I pretty much went through my whole, whatever I did 15 years ago all over again, and they [50:42.480 --> 50:48.480] tracked me from one county to the next, and they dragged me through there like a cow with [50:48.480 --> 50:50.480] a nose ring, you know what I'm saying? [50:50.480 --> 50:53.480] And just pulled me through the crud. [50:53.480 --> 50:59.480] But anyway, the thing is, they did not release me from them charges. [50:59.480 --> 51:08.480] I was not released from them charges until three months into my stay in their nice hotel. [51:08.480 --> 51:13.480] I was there for three months, and then my attorney finally talked the judge into letting [51:13.480 --> 51:17.480] me go for what they call a time-served, secured bond. [51:17.480 --> 51:19.480] Yeah, unsecured bond, okay. [51:19.480 --> 51:21.480] I thought they let you out on time-served, but okay. [51:21.480 --> 51:27.480] Either way, this attorney is not going to help you with the civil lawsuit side of that. [51:27.480 --> 51:33.480] He might can recommend an attorney that will do it on contingency, whatever, or you need to learn [51:33.480 --> 51:37.480] to do it yourself, which you'll need something like the jurisdictionary course to do. [51:37.480 --> 51:42.480] I'm trying to get the pro-safe thing together right now myself, but I need to know which [51:42.480 --> 51:44.480] angle to come at. [51:44.480 --> 51:46.480] Richard, Richard, Richard. [51:46.480 --> 51:47.480] Yes. [51:47.480 --> 51:53.480] You need to get something like jurisdictionary that will teach you how to properly do a lawsuit, [51:53.480 --> 52:01.480] and then you need to start researching cases on filing Title 42 lawsuits in the federal court. [52:01.480 --> 52:02.480] Title 42? [52:02.480 --> 52:03.480] Yes. [52:03.480 --> 52:04.480] Okay. [52:04.480 --> 52:05.480] All right. [52:05.480 --> 52:07.480] Well, I'm in the middle district. [52:07.480 --> 52:13.480] It's going to be federal court in the middle district of North Carolina. [52:13.480 --> 52:16.480] They're giving me a pro-safe packet, and I'm trying to file. [52:16.480 --> 52:19.480] What do they call that? [52:19.480 --> 52:21.480] It doesn't matter what they give you. [52:21.480 --> 52:26.480] You still have the responsibility to file everything properly, or they will throw it out, [52:26.480 --> 52:30.480] especially if you attempt to go in there indigent. [52:30.480 --> 52:31.480] Okay. [52:31.480 --> 52:32.480] Yes. [52:32.480 --> 52:33.480] And what did you call that just now? [52:33.480 --> 52:34.480] It was what? [52:34.480 --> 52:35.480] Title 42 what? [52:35.480 --> 52:38.480] It's a Title 42 lawsuit. [52:38.480 --> 52:46.480] Title 42, 1983 or 84 or anywhere up there, depending upon what your claims are. [52:46.480 --> 52:47.480] Okay. [52:47.480 --> 52:48.480] All right. [52:48.480 --> 52:50.480] And so how do I determine my claims? [52:50.480 --> 52:57.480] Well, again, that is exactly what you need to be reading up on, what your causes of actions are [52:57.480 --> 53:02.480] in a Title 42 lawsuit and how to state them. [53:02.480 --> 53:03.480] Okay. [53:03.480 --> 53:09.480] You need to go to a law library or some library that's got law books and read up on the subject [53:09.480 --> 53:11.480] if you're going to do this yourself. [53:11.480 --> 53:03.480] I've been into that 16th [53:13.480 --> 53:14.480] Okay. [53:14.480 --> 53:15.480] Wait. [53:15.480 --> 53:19.480] American Jurisprudence is an encyclopedia of law. [53:19.480 --> 53:20.480] It is not the law. [53:20.480 --> 53:23.480] It is not a law book. [53:23.480 --> 53:30.480] It is an encyclopedia of court opinions on given subjects. [53:30.480 --> 53:31.480] Okay. [53:31.480 --> 53:35.480] It gives synopsises of those court opinions. [53:35.480 --> 53:39.480] It's an encyclopedia, not a law book. [53:39.480 --> 53:42.480] Okay. [53:42.480 --> 53:44.480] Title 42. [53:44.480 --> 53:45.480] Yeah. [53:45.480 --> 53:48.480] That's what I'm trying to find out. [53:48.480 --> 53:52.480] Title 42 civil rights lawsuit. [53:52.480 --> 53:54.480] Civil rights? [53:54.480 --> 53:56.480] Yes. [53:56.480 --> 53:57.480] Okay. [53:57.480 --> 53:58.480] All right. [53:58.480 --> 54:00.480] I thought we weren't talking about civil rights. [54:00.480 --> 54:03.480] I'm not a slave. [54:03.480 --> 54:07.480] If you want to split those hairs and have nothing better to do. [54:07.480 --> 54:09.480] I just heard you say it on your last show. [54:09.480 --> 54:12.480] No. [54:12.480 --> 54:14.480] We're talking about two different things. [54:14.480 --> 54:21.480] I am telling you what the proper vernacular is for these types of suits so you can research them. [54:21.480 --> 54:22.480] Okay. [54:22.480 --> 54:24.480] I'm not giving you a label. [54:24.480 --> 54:27.480] I am telling you what the type of suit is called. [54:27.480 --> 54:31.480] If you want to be able to find it in the law library, that might be handy. [54:31.480 --> 54:33.480] Don't you think? [54:33.480 --> 54:34.480] Yep. [54:34.480 --> 54:35.480] You're absolutely right. [54:35.480 --> 54:36.480] Absolutely. [54:36.480 --> 54:37.480] Dude, I appreciate you, man. [54:37.480 --> 54:38.480] You're awesome, man. [54:38.480 --> 54:39.480] You're awesome. [54:39.480 --> 54:41.480] Well, I appreciate that. [54:41.480 --> 54:42.480] Yeah, sir. [54:42.480 --> 54:43.480] Absolutely, man. [54:43.480 --> 54:44.480] I'm telling you. [54:44.480 --> 54:45.480] I love you. [54:45.480 --> 54:46.480] I love Alex Jones. [54:46.480 --> 54:47.480] I love Carl Miller. [54:47.480 --> 54:48.480] You guys are a bomb. [54:48.480 --> 54:49.480] But I'm going to tell you something. [54:49.480 --> 54:50.480] What is it? [54:50.480 --> 54:51.480] 42. [54:51.480 --> 54:53.480] That's what I've got to look up and I'll find out. [54:53.480 --> 54:54.480] I'll get my answers from that. [54:54.480 --> 54:55.480] All right. [54:55.480 --> 54:59.480] Anyway, I'm trying to get myself a rally to rally for any drivers that have had their [54:59.480 --> 55:01.480] licenses taken away and we're going to… [55:01.480 --> 55:05.480] Well, you can't rally for anybody but you, so concentrate on you. [55:05.480 --> 55:06.480] Right on. [55:06.480 --> 55:07.480] You're right. [55:07.480 --> 55:08.480] Okay? [55:08.480 --> 55:09.480] All right, brother. [55:09.480 --> 55:10.480] All right. [55:10.480 --> 55:11.480] God bless you, man. [55:11.480 --> 55:12.480] You too, Rick. [55:12.480 --> 55:13.480] Good luck. [55:13.480 --> 55:14.480] All right, man. [55:14.480 --> 55:15.480] God bless you. [55:15.480 --> 55:16.480] I'll see you later, man. [55:16.480 --> 55:17.480] All right. [55:17.480 --> 55:18.480] Bye-bye. [55:18.480 --> 55:19.480] All right. [55:19.480 --> 55:20.480] Thank you. [55:20.480 --> 55:21.480] Yep. [55:21.480 --> 55:22.480] All right. [55:22.480 --> 55:23.480] Now we're going to go to Ted in Washington. [55:23.480 --> 55:24.480] Ted, I got three and a half minutes to break. [55:24.480 --> 55:27.480] And then we'll pick you up after that if we need to. [55:27.480 --> 55:28.480] Excellent, Eddie. [55:28.480 --> 55:29.480] Thank you, sir. [55:29.480 --> 55:32.480] How is the call quality coming through? [55:32.480 --> 55:38.480] Other than sounding a little bit like you're talking from the bottom of a can, fine. [55:38.480 --> 55:39.480] Okay. [55:39.480 --> 55:41.480] Hopefully the reception improves a little bit. [55:41.480 --> 55:42.480] How's this? [55:42.480 --> 55:44.480] Well, like I say, I can hear you fine. [55:44.480 --> 55:48.480] It's just got a tinny timber to it when you speak. [55:48.480 --> 55:49.480] Okay. [55:49.480 --> 55:50.480] Sorry about that. [55:50.480 --> 55:51.480] It's the best I can do. [55:51.480 --> 55:52.480] No, that's okay. [55:52.480 --> 55:53.480] Go ahead. [55:53.480 --> 55:54.480] Excellent. [55:54.480 --> 55:55.480] Thank you. [55:55.480 --> 56:02.480] I need some help with instructions and paperwork to file a public information request or a Freedom [56:02.480 --> 56:05.480] of Information Act paperwork. [56:05.480 --> 56:07.480] Wait. [56:07.480 --> 56:09.480] You want to know how to do that? [56:09.480 --> 56:10.480] Yes. [56:10.480 --> 56:14.480] I need to know how to do that and where can I acquire the paperwork from? [56:14.480 --> 56:16.480] You're in Washington, right? [56:16.480 --> 56:17.480] Yes. [56:17.480 --> 56:18.480] Okay. [56:18.480 --> 56:23.480] Does Washington have a Freedom of Information Act or they have a Public Information Act [56:23.480 --> 56:25.480] or an Open Records Act? [56:25.480 --> 56:27.480] What is it under the laws of Washington? [56:27.480 --> 56:36.480] You have to remember FOIA is a federal government program, Freedom of Information Act. [56:36.480 --> 56:40.480] Some states have state FOIAs, but they don't call them FOIAs. [56:40.480 --> 56:44.480] They might, but you need to figure out what they are in your state. [56:44.480 --> 56:48.480] For instance, here in Texas, they can't figure out what name they want to give it. [56:48.480 --> 56:52.480] They used to be the Texas Open Records Act. [56:52.480 --> 56:55.480] Then it became the Open Records Act. [56:55.480 --> 56:57.480] Then it became the Public Information Act. [56:57.480 --> 57:00.480] They can't make up their damn minds. [57:00.480 --> 57:03.480] So you need to figure out what it actually is because that's where you're going to find [57:03.480 --> 57:09.480] the statute to tell you how to do it and what everyone has to comply with. [57:09.480 --> 57:10.480] Okay. [57:10.480 --> 57:11.480] So I need to do some research and study. [57:11.480 --> 57:14.480] Now, again, which one you're going to use, the federal or the state, [57:14.480 --> 57:18.480] will also depend upon who you're requesting the information from. [57:18.480 --> 57:23.480] If you're going to a federal agency, then you use a FOIA. [57:23.480 --> 57:29.480] If you're going to a state agency, you use the state laws for that. [57:29.480 --> 57:30.480] Okay. [57:30.480 --> 57:32.480] This would be the Washington State Troopers. [57:32.480 --> 57:33.480] Okay. [57:33.480 --> 57:39.480] Then you'll use the state laws unless you're asking for information on a federal program [57:39.480 --> 57:45.480] implemented, managed, or maintained or executed by that state agency, [57:45.480 --> 57:49.480] then you should be able to do it with either or. [57:49.480 --> 57:51.480] I see. [57:51.480 --> 57:57.480] Okay, because I do have some details as to why I'm going about it this way. [57:57.480 --> 57:58.480] Okay. [57:58.480 --> 57:59.480] Well, if you'll hang on just a minute, [57:59.480 --> 58:03.480] I'll be happy to cover those with you on the other side of the break. [58:03.480 --> 58:04.480] All right. [58:04.480 --> 58:07.480] So if you'll hang on, we'll cover that when we get back, okay? [58:07.480 --> 58:08.480] All right. [58:08.480 --> 58:09.480] All right, folks. [58:09.480 --> 58:13.480] This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig. [58:13.480 --> 58:18.480] Call in number is 512-646-1984. [58:18.480 --> 58:22.480] So if you want to call in with an issue or a question or even just a commentary [58:22.480 --> 58:28.480] and let us know what you think of the show or any of the shows, that'll be fine. [58:28.480 --> 58:31.480] And do remember that we're still trying to get the fundraiser completed. [58:31.480 --> 58:34.480] I don't know how well Deborah's doing on that. [58:34.480 --> 58:39.480] But please just check the website, logosradionetwork.com, [58:39.480 --> 58:41.480] and we'll see what we can see there. [58:41.480 --> 58:43.480] But in the meantime, we're going to take a break. [58:43.480 --> 58:50.480] We'll be right back. [58:50.480 --> 58:53.480] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, [58:53.480 --> 58:58.480] yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.480 --> 59:01.480] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, [59:01.480 --> 59:06.480] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. [59:06.480 --> 59:08.480] Enter the recovery version. [59:08.480 --> 59:12.480] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [59:12.480 --> 59:17.480] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:17.480 --> 59:21.480] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [59:21.480 --> 59:27.480] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:27.480 --> 59:32.480] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:32.480 --> 59:43.480] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:43.480 --> 59:47.480] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:47.480 --> 59:50.480] That's freestudybible.com. [59:50.480 --> 01:00:00.480] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.480 --> 01:00:21.480] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown. [01:00:21.480 --> 01:00:28.480] Markets for Wednesday, March 9, 2016 are currently trending with gold at $1,252.65 an ounce, [01:00:28.480 --> 01:00:33.480] for $13.29 an ounce, Texas crude for $36.50 a barrel, [01:00:33.480 --> 01:00:42.480] and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $411 U.S. currency. [01:00:42.480 --> 01:00:47.480] Today in history, the year 1961, the first animal safely returned from space [01:00:47.480 --> 01:00:51.480] after completing one full orbit around the Earth in Sputnik 9, [01:00:51.480 --> 01:00:59.480] a doggie named Tarnuska or Blackie returned from the heavens. Today in history. [01:00:59.480 --> 01:01:02.480] In recent news, Tehrad Pugh, a U.S. Air Force veteran, [01:01:02.480 --> 01:01:05.480] was found guilty today of attempting to join the Islamic State. [01:01:05.480 --> 01:01:08.480] After a week-long trial at a Brooklyn federal court, [01:01:08.480 --> 01:01:12.480] a jury found Tehrad guilty of attempting to provide material support to ISIS [01:01:12.480 --> 01:01:17.480] and guilty of obstruction for destroying four e-storage drives after his detention in Turkey. [01:01:17.480 --> 01:01:19.480] Pugh is set to be sentenced in September. [01:01:19.480 --> 01:01:23.480] Pugh's defense lawyer is arguing that all he did was express repugnant views [01:01:23.480 --> 01:01:27.480] about the Islamic State on Facebook and watch dozens of the group's recruitment videos, [01:01:27.480 --> 01:01:31.480] and that he was only traveling to Turkey to find work, not to become a jihadist. [01:01:31.480 --> 01:01:35.480] However, prosecutors are presenting a letter he apparently drafted to his Egyptian wife, [01:01:35.480 --> 01:01:39.480] which was found on his laptop in which he vowed to fight for Islam. [01:01:39.480 --> 01:01:43.480] When detained in Istanbul, he apparently had a black face mask, [01:01:43.480 --> 01:01:46.480] a map depicting Islamic State's stronghold in Syria, [01:01:46.480 --> 01:01:50.480] and a chart of the border crossings between Turkey and Syria. [01:01:50.480 --> 01:01:55.480] Pugh served as an avionics specialist in the Air Force from 1986 to 1990 [01:01:55.480 --> 01:02:00.480] and later worked as an Army contractor in Iraq from 2009 to 2010. [01:02:05.480 --> 01:02:09.480] Toyota recently showed off a new device that could dramatically assist the visually impaired [01:02:09.480 --> 01:02:11.480] to better navigate their surroundings. [01:02:11.480 --> 01:02:15.480] Called Project Blade an informational device to bridge the gap between a cane or a guide dog, [01:02:15.480 --> 01:02:18.480] Toyota has been testing various prototypes of the wearable device [01:02:18.480 --> 01:02:21.480] with individuals from the visually impaired community for the past three years, [01:02:21.480 --> 01:02:24.480] and though the details of the project were released this week, [01:02:24.480 --> 01:02:26.480] no official timeline has been set for the release. [01:02:26.480 --> 01:02:30.480] The automaker plans incorporating mapping, object identification, [01:02:30.480 --> 01:02:33.480] and facial mapping technologies into Blade in the future. [01:02:33.480 --> 01:02:36.480] Doug Moore, manager of partner robotics at Toyota, [01:02:36.480 --> 01:02:40.480] told ABC that Toyota is thinking about quality of life for individuals [01:02:40.480 --> 01:02:42.480] and how it impacts society. [01:02:42.480 --> 01:02:45.480] If you don't start a lowdown and are currently looking to fulfill some ad space, [01:02:45.480 --> 01:02:48.480] and if you have a product or service you'd like to advertise with us, [01:02:48.480 --> 01:02:52.480] feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257. [01:02:52.480 --> 01:03:13.480] This is Rick Roady with your lowdown for March 9th, 2016. [01:03:22.480 --> 01:03:27.480] . [01:03:27.480 --> 01:03:32.480] . [01:03:32.480 --> 01:03:37.480] . [01:03:37.480 --> 01:03:42.480] . [01:03:42.480 --> 01:03:47.480] . [01:03:47.480 --> 01:03:52.480] . [01:03:52.480 --> 01:03:53.480] . [01:03:53.480 --> 01:03:55.480] . [01:03:55.480 --> 01:03:56.480] . [01:03:56.480 --> 01:03:57.480] . [01:03:57.480 --> 01:04:01.480] . [01:04:01.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:01.480 --> 01:04:02.480] . [01:04:01.480 --> 01:04:02.480] . [01:04:01.480 --> 01:04:02.480] . [01:04:01.480 --> 01:04:02.480] . [01:04:01.480 --> 01:04:02.480] . [01:04:01.480 --> 01:04:02.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:02.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:02.480 --> 01:04:03.480] . [01:04:03.480 --> 01:04:10.380] All righty, so the reason I want to get this public records request is I'm trying [01:04:10.380 --> 01:04:14.080] to obtain information about the state troopers' vehicles themselves. [01:04:14.800 --> 01:04:21.280] The reason for that is I got pulled over for tinted windows while driving engaged [01:04:21.280 --> 01:04:26.520] in commerce, and they themselves have tints on their fleet cars too. [01:04:26.880 --> 01:04:30.520] I'm wondering if I could use that as leverage in my situation. [01:04:30.520 --> 01:04:34.720] Not unless, not if the statute grants a special exception for them, [01:04:34.800 --> 01:04:36.520] which it very well probably does. [01:04:38.080 --> 01:04:40.840] Okay. Ouch. [01:04:42.080 --> 01:04:46.480] But now you need to verify that, but now also be aware of this. [01:04:46.920 --> 01:04:55.760] Certain information relating to what they would consider, it's not classified, [01:04:55.760 --> 01:04:58.000] classified, but they treat it as if it is. [01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:03.560] So it's been accepted from public information acts, and you may be able only [01:05:03.560 --> 01:05:07.240] to obtain it through discovery, but that type of information [01:05:07.240 --> 01:05:12.040] or discovery will not help you if the law gives them a specific exception for it. [01:05:13.640 --> 01:05:14.400] I understand. [01:05:14.520 --> 01:05:20.880] So you need to check the statute to see if the window tinting statutes or anything relating [01:05:20.880 --> 01:05:24.360] to the agency itself grants them that exception. [01:05:24.360 --> 01:05:28.720] Okay. Okay, so more, more research. [01:05:29.120 --> 01:05:29.320] Yeah. [01:05:29.320 --> 01:05:33.480] All right, it'll be fun stuff. [01:05:33.480 --> 01:05:38.480] I did submit a motion to dismiss, and I also submitted a Brady request, [01:05:39.200 --> 01:05:44.760] but on that Brady request, I did not ask information about their, their fleet cars themselves. [01:05:45.480 --> 01:05:47.760] It was just the front and back of the ticket, [01:05:47.760 --> 01:05:50.280] and names of the witnesses they're going to rely on at the hearing. [01:05:50.280 --> 01:05:55.680] Okay. Well, you may have already shot yourself in the foot about getting any of that [01:05:55.680 --> 01:05:58.400] through discovery if you've already filed a motion for discovery. [01:05:59.400 --> 01:06:02.440] They're not going to let you keep filing discovery over and over again, [01:06:02.440 --> 01:06:04.120] so you need to be real careful about that. [01:06:06.120 --> 01:06:06.600] Okay, I see. [01:06:07.600 --> 01:06:12.320] I was hoping that this public info request can be slightly different than the Brady because... [01:06:12.320 --> 01:06:17.080] Well, the thing about it is discovery is more powerful than public information request, [01:06:17.080 --> 01:06:17.840] and here's why. [01:06:17.840 --> 01:06:22.840] Public information requests are limited to official records. [01:06:23.840 --> 01:06:29.840] Okay. Now, those records include things like policies, procedure manuals, and things of that nature, [01:06:30.840 --> 01:06:32.840] but they are limited to records. [01:06:33.840 --> 01:06:38.840] Whereas discovery can be virtually anything relevant to a case [01:06:39.840 --> 01:06:45.840] that is in the possession of some other party or person that is relevant to the case. [01:06:45.840 --> 01:06:48.840] And you need to prove one side or the other of it. [01:06:50.840 --> 01:06:51.840] Gotcha. [01:06:52.840 --> 01:06:58.840] So at this point, you're saying that the odds are against me because the facts are... [01:06:58.840 --> 01:07:01.840] No, I didn't say that at all because I don't know what all the facts are. [01:07:02.840 --> 01:07:08.840] What I'm saying is that you are jumping the gun without enough information. [01:07:09.840 --> 01:07:13.840] You're looking to discover information that without knowing what the source of the information is, [01:07:13.840 --> 01:07:18.840] you're looking to discover information that without knowing what the statute does or does not accept [01:07:19.840 --> 01:07:21.840] may or may not do you any good. [01:07:21.840 --> 01:07:25.840] Thus, you're wasting time and increasing your expense to do it. [01:07:26.840 --> 01:07:27.840] You see what I'm saying? [01:07:28.840 --> 01:07:29.840] I'm not saying it's a bad thing. [01:07:30.840 --> 01:07:32.840] If there's an exception, then it's pointless. [01:07:33.840 --> 01:07:35.840] If there isn't, then it might be something to rely on. [01:07:35.840 --> 01:07:42.840] What would be a good starting point that you recommend for me to do all this research in? [01:07:43.840 --> 01:07:46.840] Well, what all research are we talking about here? [01:07:47.840 --> 01:07:49.840] Because the only thing I've heard you mention is window tint. [01:07:50.840 --> 01:07:54.840] Right, the application as to who it applies to. [01:07:55.840 --> 01:07:57.840] The window tint? [01:07:58.840 --> 01:07:59.840] Yeah, I'm going to start using... [01:08:00.840 --> 01:08:03.840] Okay, you said you were stopped engaging in commerce, right? [01:08:03.840 --> 01:08:04.840] Correct. [01:08:05.840 --> 01:08:11.840] Okay, so where are we going to come up with an argument that a commercial statute doesn't apply? [01:08:12.840 --> 01:08:14.840] No, I wasn't saying that. [01:08:15.840 --> 01:08:20.840] I was just trying to find the proper use of my energies to start researching this. [01:08:21.840 --> 01:08:27.840] Well, again, you need to look at what the window tint statute says, and then you need to see if it matches the underlying law. [01:08:28.840 --> 01:08:30.840] Remember, the statute is not the law. [01:08:30.840 --> 01:08:37.840] The statute is an interpretation of the legislative act, which is the law. [01:08:38.840 --> 01:08:41.840] I do remember you saying that on previous shows. [01:08:42.840 --> 01:08:50.840] So, when you look at the statute, you need to find out what legislative session and bill number that statute came from. [01:08:50.840 --> 01:08:59.840] Then you need to go and pull up that bill, whether it be on the legislature's own website, a law library that's got the journals, whatever, [01:09:00.840 --> 01:09:08.840] but you get a copy of that bill, and at the very top in the title or caption, it'll tell you what the subject matter is, [01:09:09.840 --> 01:09:13.840] what it relates to, and what all the statutes, therefore, must relate to. [01:09:14.840 --> 01:09:17.840] Then you look at the statute in question within the bill. [01:09:17.840 --> 01:09:25.840] Now, remember this also, you don't stay with the bill that created the statute you're looking at, okay, [01:09:26.840 --> 01:09:30.840] because all that is is a legislative rubber stamp. [01:09:31.840 --> 01:09:39.840] You have to go back to the original underlying law, which may be several statutory revisions backwards. [01:09:40.840 --> 01:09:45.840] For instance, here in Texas, do you know what laws all the current statutes are based on? [01:09:45.840 --> 01:09:48.840] I do not. [01:09:49.840 --> 01:09:54.840] The actual laws are the 1925 session laws. [01:09:55.840 --> 01:09:57.840] Wow. [01:09:58.840 --> 01:10:05.840] Everything since then has been an amendment to the existing statutory scheme. [01:10:06.840 --> 01:10:08.840] Okay. [01:10:09.840 --> 01:10:12.840] So, amendment to the laws. [01:10:12.840 --> 01:10:14.840] Okay. [01:10:15.840 --> 01:10:17.840] Excellent, sir. [01:10:18.840 --> 01:10:19.840] Okay. [01:10:20.840 --> 01:10:22.840] All right, lots of research coming up. [01:10:23.840 --> 01:10:26.840] This is very inquisitive for me, so I really appreciate it. [01:10:27.840 --> 01:10:28.840] Well, wish you luck. [01:10:29.840 --> 01:10:30.840] All right. Thank you, Eddie. [01:10:31.840 --> 01:10:32.840] You're welcome. Bye-bye. [01:10:33.840 --> 01:10:35.840] All right. Now, let's see. [01:10:36.840 --> 01:10:37.840] We have Donald. [01:10:37.840 --> 01:10:41.840] Donald, I don't know where you're at, but what can we do for you? [01:10:42.840 --> 01:10:43.840] Fort Worth, Texas. [01:10:44.840 --> 01:10:45.840] You're in Fort Worth, Texas, okay. [01:10:46.840 --> 01:10:47.840] I have a document. [01:10:48.840 --> 01:10:55.840] I had 4G via email, municipal court, automated red light enforcement appeals. [01:10:56.840 --> 01:10:57.840] Yes, sir. [01:10:57.840 --> 01:11:06.840] The hearing officer told me I had no defense. [01:11:07.840 --> 01:11:12.840] The hearing officer in this case was some police officer in that municipal police department, correct? [01:11:13.840 --> 01:11:14.840] That's correct. [01:11:14.840 --> 01:11:34.840] Okay. And he shared with me because I was bound by signing my license, my driver's license. I was bound by the transportation code of 707 or transportation law, excuse me, 707.013. [01:11:34.840 --> 01:11:44.840] Well, here's the problem. First and foremost, that's a legal conclusion, which a moron in blue is not qualified or empowered to make. [01:11:45.840 --> 01:11:55.840] Second problem, this so-called appeals process you wrote me about is not an appeal. You know why? Because you don't get a jury. [01:11:55.840 --> 01:12:03.840] The only person you're going to get to see for your appeal is a judge in that same municipality. [01:12:04.840 --> 01:12:17.840] In other words, the city is your judge, jury, and executioner in this case, which means there is no judicial review of the facts of the case. [01:12:17.840 --> 01:12:29.840] Everything in your case is administrative and therefore constitutes nothing more than an unconstitutional and illegal bill of pains and penalties. [01:12:30.840 --> 01:12:32.840] So there's no jurisdiction? [01:12:32.840 --> 01:12:47.840] Well, the thing about it is the statute, even if the statute were valid and it's not, the statute only authorizes them to file a civil lawsuit to get the $75. [01:12:48.840 --> 01:13:00.840] Okay? They have to sue you. That's what the statute specifically says they can do. It is a civil penalty for which they must file suit. [01:13:00.840 --> 01:13:13.840] They didn't file suit. Then they turn around and say that the only way that you can contest what they do is to pay them first. That's also illegal. [01:13:14.840 --> 01:13:26.840] Okay? So right there, they have several problems with this. The question is, what are you willing to do about it? What are you capable of doing about it? [01:13:26.840 --> 01:13:31.840] Now, you asked me to give you the information from what I see from the last email you sent me here. [01:13:32.840 --> 01:13:47.840] If you go to the blog site that I gave you, thetoweloflaw.wordpress.com, and you look at that red light camera article, down at the bottom of that article are all of the documents attached to that lawsuit, including the original filing by the law firm. [01:13:48.840 --> 01:13:51.840] All of their contact information is in that document. [01:13:51.840 --> 01:14:03.840] Oh, that's kind of interesting because I look at that and it appears to be from Houston. Maybe I'm looking at the wrong one, but it was a Houston firm. [01:14:03.840 --> 01:14:25.840] No. Well, if it's in Houston, there are two different firms there. Houston was the ones that issued the ticket, if I'm not mistaken. They issued a red light camera citation to a car belonging to a man in Louisiana who hadn't even been here. [01:14:25.840 --> 01:14:37.840] And Houston issued the ticket, but the law firm he hired to fight the ticket and file the lawsuit, I'm pretty sure, was in either Plano or Fort Worth. [01:14:38.840 --> 01:14:53.840] Yeah, I didn't see that. Well, the only one I saw was the guy versus Allen City, and the law firm was out of Houston, and I called the Houston law firm, and that young lady, they didn't recognize her. [01:14:53.840 --> 01:14:55.840] So, recognize her? [01:14:56.840 --> 01:14:59.840] Yeah, they said that she wasn't on their list. [01:15:00.840 --> 01:15:13.840] Okay. Somewhere, we're not having a connection here on where this is. Hang on just a second, because I'm pretty sure that, let's see. [01:15:13.840 --> 01:15:22.840] Do you recognize that block? It's called Blocky something, LLP. [01:15:22.840 --> 01:15:43.840] All right. Let's see. That's the city attorney representation letter. All right. The city attorney, this was Crossfield. [01:15:43.840 --> 01:15:58.840] This was Elgin. And yeah, that's the representation letter, the actual plaintiff's notice of filing suit. [01:15:59.840 --> 01:16:07.840] Irving, Texas. The law firm is Bowman and Stella PC, Irving, Texas. [01:16:08.840 --> 01:16:09.840] Bowman. [01:16:09.840 --> 01:16:15.840] Okay. Their number is 214-922-0220. [01:16:16.840 --> 01:16:18.840] 922-0220. [01:16:19.840 --> 01:16:24.840] 922-0220, area code 214. [01:16:25.840 --> 01:16:26.840] Got it. Thank you. [01:16:27.840 --> 01:16:36.840] I'll make sure I'll give them a call first thing in the morning. And should I turn in this document or don't sign it and just let it go? [01:16:36.840 --> 01:16:45.840] No, you're going to need that for them. They're going to want you to send them everything. If they agree to see you or talk to you or take a case for you, they're going to want that. [01:16:46.840 --> 01:16:52.840] So make sure everything that you've gotten from anyone in relation to this, you get it organized and ready to send over to them however you need to. [01:16:52.840 --> 01:17:05.840] All right, hang on just a second and we'll pick this up on the other side, okay? We'll be right back, folks. [01:17:22.840 --> 01:17:28.840] The 2016 fundraiser has been extended to March 17th. Head on over to logosradionetwork.com to make your contribution. [01:17:29.840 --> 01:17:33.840] Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks. [01:17:34.840 --> 01:17:38.840] First prize being a Spiked Skull Lower Receiver, second prize being a Taurus Curve. [01:17:39.840 --> 01:17:44.840] And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you'll also receive a complimentary jar of My Magic Mud. [01:17:45.840 --> 01:17:49.840] Donations by all major credit cards are accepted as well as contributions by Bitcoin. [01:17:49.840 --> 01:17:52.840] The Logos Radio Network Fundraiser now through March 17th. [01:17:53.840 --> 01:17:58.840] Head on over to logosradionetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the Logos Radio Network on the air. [01:17:59.840 --> 01:18:05.840] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [01:18:06.840 --> 01:18:10.840] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:18:11.840 --> 01:18:16.840] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:18:16.840 --> 01:18:24.840] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:18:25.840 --> 01:18:30.840] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:18:31.840 --> 01:18:38.840] We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:18:38.840 --> 01:18:45.840] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:18:46.840 --> 01:18:50.840] As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:51.840 --> 01:18:57.840] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [01:18:58.840 --> 01:18:59.840] Order now. [01:18:59.840 --> 01:19:07.840] This is the Logos Logos Radio Network. [01:19:29.840 --> 01:19:54.840] Alright folks, we are back. [01:19:55.840 --> 01:19:56.840] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:19:56.840 --> 01:19:59.840] Alright, and we are talking with Donald. [01:20:00.840 --> 01:20:01.840] Alright, Donald, go ahead. [01:20:02.840 --> 01:20:13.840] So, the guy, you know, was telling me I had no difference, and he was going to set it up for a PO. [01:20:14.840 --> 01:20:16.840] Well, first off, let me ask you this. [01:20:17.840 --> 01:20:18.840] What did you say to him? [01:20:19.840 --> 01:20:20.840] Tell him whatever. [01:20:20.840 --> 01:20:29.840] He asked me, was the vehicle that he was showing me on the video, was I the owner? [01:20:30.840 --> 01:20:32.840] And I shared with him I was not the owner. [01:20:33.840 --> 01:20:34.840] And he looked at me funny. [01:20:35.840 --> 01:20:37.840] He said, well, who's the owner of that vehicle? [01:20:38.840 --> 01:20:39.840] I told him, the state of Texas. [01:20:40.840 --> 01:20:42.840] He looked at me funny again. [01:20:43.840 --> 01:20:44.840] He said, what do you mean by that? [01:20:45.840 --> 01:20:47.840] I said, the state of Texas is the title holder. [01:20:47.840 --> 01:20:49.840] They're the owner. [01:20:50.840 --> 01:20:54.840] And he said, okay, are you the registered owner? [01:20:55.840 --> 01:20:56.840] And I said, part. [01:20:57.840 --> 01:20:58.840] He says, who's the other owner? [01:20:59.840 --> 01:21:00.840] I said, the state of Texas. [01:21:01.840 --> 01:21:03.840] He says, well, what do you mean by that? [01:21:04.840 --> 01:21:05.840] I said, I just have a certificate. [01:21:06.840 --> 01:21:07.840] They have the original title. [01:21:08.840 --> 01:21:10.840] So, I'm not the owner of the vehicle. [01:21:11.840 --> 01:21:12.840] I'm part owner. [01:21:12.840 --> 01:21:19.840] He said, okay, then answer me this, do you pay registration once a year? [01:21:20.840 --> 01:21:21.840] I said, yes. [01:21:22.840 --> 01:21:23.840] He said, well, you're the registered owner. [01:21:24.840 --> 01:21:28.840] And I said, no, I'm part registered owner. [01:21:29.840 --> 01:21:31.840] He says, do you have a driver's license? [01:21:32.840 --> 01:21:33.840] I said, yes. [01:21:34.840 --> 01:21:35.840] He said, can I see it? [01:21:36.840 --> 01:21:37.840] I said, sure. [01:21:38.840 --> 01:21:39.840] He said, you see your signature down here? [01:21:39.840 --> 01:21:45.840] It says that you will uphold all the transportation laws based off of that signature on your driving license. [01:21:46.840 --> 01:21:52.840] So, you're bound by the transportation laws of the state of Texas. [01:21:53.840 --> 01:21:55.840] He forgot one little caveat to that, see? [01:21:56.840 --> 01:22:04.840] You are only bound by the transportation laws if and when you are using that license to engage in transportation. [01:22:04.840 --> 01:22:13.840] Having the license alone is not evidence of, nor intent to, engage in transportation. [01:22:14.840 --> 01:22:22.840] It means you can if you wish, because your documentation is in place for that purpose. [01:22:23.840 --> 01:22:26.840] But that is not evidence that you are doing so. [01:22:26.840 --> 01:22:38.840] Any more than having a hunting license or a fishing license is evidence that you are hunting or fishing because you buy meat in the freezer at the grocery store. [01:22:39.840 --> 01:22:40.840] True. [01:22:41.840 --> 01:22:42.840] Okay? [01:22:43.840 --> 01:22:44.840] True. [01:22:45.840 --> 01:22:48.840] This is why idiots are not allowed to make conclusions of law. [01:22:49.840 --> 01:22:50.840] Okay? [01:22:50.840 --> 01:22:55.840] And then he said, well, I told him, I said, that's not true. [01:22:56.840 --> 01:22:59.840] I said, I'm not consenting. [01:23:00.840 --> 01:23:03.840] Okay, the problem is though, here's the problem, Donald. [01:23:04.840 --> 01:23:05.840] You are talking. [01:23:06.840 --> 01:23:07.840] Okay? [01:23:08.840 --> 01:23:09.840] You shouldn't be doing that. [01:23:10.840 --> 01:23:12.840] Why are you talking to him in the first place? [01:23:13.840 --> 01:23:15.840] See, here's the thing. [01:23:15.840 --> 01:23:19.840] Okay, officer, you're asking me all these questions. [01:23:20.840 --> 01:23:26.840] Do you have any evidence in support of your conclusion that I am the one responsible for running this light? [01:23:27.840 --> 01:23:31.840] Well, you own the car, objection, non-responsive, does not answer my question. [01:23:32.840 --> 01:23:36.840] Do you have any evidence that I am the one that ran this light? [01:23:37.840 --> 01:23:39.840] Well, if you weren't, who did? [01:23:40.840 --> 01:23:41.840] Officer, again, non-responsive. [01:23:41.840 --> 01:23:48.840] Do you have any evidence that I am the one that ran this light? [01:23:49.840 --> 01:23:51.840] You see how this works? [01:23:52.840 --> 01:23:54.840] We don't get into discussions with them. [01:23:55.840 --> 01:24:02.840] We do not tell them where they're screwing up or how they're screwing up because that gives them too many opportunities to make a way around it. [01:24:03.840 --> 01:24:04.840] I see. [01:24:05.840 --> 01:24:06.840] Okay? [01:24:06.840 --> 01:24:13.840] So instead of going that route, protect your rights, okay? [01:24:14.840 --> 01:24:15.840] Protect your rights. [01:24:16.840 --> 01:24:17.840] Stop talking. [01:24:18.840 --> 01:24:19.840] Okay? [01:24:20.840 --> 01:24:21.840] I don't know why I can't get people to do that. [01:24:22.840 --> 01:24:26.840] It's like they think this is some sort of game that they can win, and it isn't. [01:24:27.840 --> 01:24:30.840] You are not trained in investigatory techniques. [01:24:31.840 --> 01:24:32.840] That cop is. [01:24:32.840 --> 01:24:38.840] That cop is trained to ask questions that will get the answers he wants, right or wrong. [01:24:39.840 --> 01:24:40.840] Okay? [01:24:41.840 --> 01:24:42.840] Okay. [01:24:43.840 --> 01:24:44.840] Don't do that. [01:24:45.840 --> 01:24:53.840] In any case, I'm assuming that he wrote up that you have a finding of liability. [01:24:54.840 --> 01:24:55.840] That's correct. [01:24:56.840 --> 01:24:57.840] Okay. [01:24:57.840 --> 01:25:06.840] That's correct, and also that's what that form says. You must submit this form before the 31st day after a finding of liability. [01:25:07.840 --> 01:25:13.840] Yeah, the problem is that you're not, as I said, you're not going to get a judicial determination of anything. [01:25:14.840 --> 01:25:18.840] This red light camera scam is exactly that, a scam. [01:25:19.840 --> 01:25:25.840] It is an unconstitutional bill of pains and penalties without judicial review. [01:25:25.840 --> 01:25:27.840] That is the key factor. [01:25:28.840 --> 01:25:32.840] Nothing in this ever goes through judicial review, nothing. [01:25:33.840 --> 01:25:36.840] That alone makes it unconstitutional. [01:25:38.840 --> 01:25:47.840] Now that's one thing that that lawsuit never bothers to raise is calling it a bill of pains and penalties, but that's exactly what it is. [01:25:47.840 --> 01:25:59.840] If me and this attorney's firm could have a long discussion about the transportation code, I guarantee you their lawsuit would have a hell of a lot more in it than this one does. [01:26:00.840 --> 01:26:02.840] Oh, that's good. [01:26:03.840 --> 01:26:07.840] Because I could open their eyes to things they're not even considering. [01:26:07.840 --> 01:26:19.840] Okay, because I noticed that I lost my train of thought. [01:26:20.840 --> 01:26:27.840] I told the guy that I was reserving my right. [01:26:28.840 --> 01:26:30.840] Not if you're talking, you're not. [01:26:31.840 --> 01:26:35.840] That's the problem. [01:26:35.840 --> 01:26:39.840] I told him the record, I wanted the record in respect, I'm reserving my right. [01:26:40.840 --> 01:26:44.840] There is no record. You're talking to a moron. There is no record. [01:26:45.840 --> 01:26:47.840] Well, he gave me notes and he made notes. [01:26:48.840 --> 01:26:52.840] But you don't control what he does with those notes or what he writes in them. [01:26:53.840 --> 01:26:57.840] Oh, yes, I did, because he gave me a copy. I made him give me a copy of them. [01:26:58.840 --> 01:26:59.840] And? [01:27:00.840 --> 01:27:01.840] And I got a copy. [01:27:02.840 --> 01:27:03.840] And what good are they going to do you? [01:27:03.840 --> 01:27:10.840] Well, I mean, it tells me how he determined that I had no defense to whomever I'm supposed to see next. [01:27:11.840 --> 01:27:13.840] I just told you who you're going to see next. [01:27:14.840 --> 01:27:20.840] You're going to see a crooked municipal judge that's going to haul you right over the coals along with their cop buddy or his cop buddy. [01:27:21.840 --> 01:27:24.840] That's exactly who you're going to see. Cooperative theft. [01:27:24.840 --> 01:27:33.840] Well, hopefully when I call the law firm, they got enough savvy to do this. [01:27:34.840 --> 01:27:37.840] If not, I'll tell them to give you a call so you can help. [01:27:38.840 --> 01:27:40.840] Well, they have enough savvy to do what they did in the lawsuit. [01:27:41.840 --> 01:27:50.840] But all I'm saying is there is a lot of stuff they obviously either don't care about or don't know about that could have gone into that suit as well. [01:27:50.840 --> 01:27:55.840] That would have made it an open shut case of extortion and fraud. [01:27:56.840 --> 01:27:59.840] So would I be able to open up a new one? [01:28:00.840 --> 01:28:04.840] Well, I don't know. I don't know if they can add you to the one they have as another plaintiff. [01:28:05.840 --> 01:28:09.840] I don't know if they'd have to do one individually for you. I don't know that. I don't know what their docket is. [01:28:10.840 --> 01:28:18.840] Okay. Well, if they do open up a new one on my behalf, then I'll make sure that they consult you because I don't want the same person. [01:28:18.840 --> 01:28:23.840] Well, the first thing they're going to ask you is, is this guy an attorney? Is he a law professor? Is he any of this? [01:28:24.840 --> 01:28:29.840] And once you tell them no, which would be true, they're not going to want to talk to me. [01:28:30.840 --> 01:28:33.840] I don't mean they won't necessarily, but it'll be hard pressed to do this. [01:28:33.840 --> 01:28:54.840] But now you can tell them this, the Texas Municipal League and the Texas Municipal Education Commission tried to get me to come to Houston to do a presentation on all of these issues relating to the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Transportation Code [01:28:55.840 --> 01:29:00.840] to the same attorneys and municipal judges and JPs that are screwing people over with them. [01:29:00.840 --> 01:29:10.840] And I know the reason they invited me to do that was to see if they could come up with a defense against it. [01:29:11.840 --> 01:29:18.840] And that's the reason I didn't go because I knew what they were attempting to do. [01:29:18.840 --> 01:29:30.840] Right. Okay. That's smart. Okay. [01:29:31.840 --> 01:29:41.840] All right. So you feel free to talk to them. If they're willing to talk to me, that's fine. Shoot me an email. I'll give you my contact information by phone and I'll be happy to chat with them. [01:29:42.840 --> 01:29:43.840] Cool, cool. [01:29:44.840 --> 01:29:45.840] All right. [01:29:45.840 --> 01:29:46.840] I'm going to make it mandatory. [01:29:46.840 --> 01:29:48.840] Okay. All right. Anything else? [01:29:49.840 --> 01:29:50.840] Hey. [01:29:50.840 --> 01:29:58.840] All right. Well, then hang on and we'll cover that on the other side. I got a break coming up. All right, folks. We'll be right back. 512-646-1984. [01:30:00.840 --> 01:30:06.840] Having trouble breathing? You might want to reach for a bitter tasting substance like grapefruit peel and take a big whiff. [01:30:07.840 --> 01:30:13.840] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and in a moment I'll tell you how bitter foods could be traditional inhalers for opening blocked air passages. [01:30:13.840 --> 01:30:23.840] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:24.840 --> 01:30:31.840] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. [01:30:31.840 --> 01:30:42.840] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage. [01:30:43.840 --> 01:30:54.840] Bitter foods may soon give pharmaceutical inhalers a run for their money. Researchers have found that inhaling bitter substances opens bronchial airways better than any known asthma medication on the market. [01:30:54.840 --> 01:31:04.840] Apparently the bitter taste receptors we have in our tongues are also present in our lungs. If something tastes bitter in your mouth, the receptors in your lungs will pick up the bitter scent molecules too. [01:31:05.840 --> 01:31:14.840] The lungs react by opening up the airways. Scientists are experimenting with aerosols made of bitter substances like quinine, the ingredient that gives tonic water its bite. [01:31:15.840 --> 01:31:20.840] They believe this could help bring relief to millions of people suffering with bronchitis, emphysema, and asthma. [01:31:20.840 --> 01:31:25.840] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:29.840 --> 01:31:34.840] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:35.840 --> 01:31:41.840] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:42.840 --> 01:31:44.840] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:45.840 --> 01:31:47.840] Thousands of my fellow force respond as a plane. [01:31:47.840 --> 01:31:49.840] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:50.840 --> 01:31:52.840] I'm a New York City correctional. I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:53.840 --> 01:31:56.840] I'm the father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:57.840 --> 01:31:59.840] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:00.840 --> 01:32:04.840] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:05.840 --> 01:32:09.840] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it. [01:32:10.840 --> 01:32:13.840] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:13.840 --> 01:32:19.840] That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:20.840 --> 01:32:25.840] And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. [01:32:26.840 --> 01:32:30.840] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [01:32:31.840 --> 01:32:37.840] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:37.840 --> 01:32:44.840] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:45.840 --> 01:32:49.840] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:50.840 --> 01:32:55.840] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:56.840 --> 01:33:00.840] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. May not actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:00.840 --> 01:33:10.840] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:30.840 --> 01:33:38.840] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:33:39.840 --> 01:33:47.840] We got a half an hour left in the show, 512-646-1984, and we are talking to Donald in Fort Worth. [01:33:48.840 --> 01:33:50.840] All right, Donald, what was that last thing you were getting into there? [01:33:51.840 --> 01:33:58.840] The last thing was just to say thank you, and I'll let you talk to the next guest. [01:33:58.840 --> 01:34:01.840] All right, sir. Thank you very much for calling in, and good luck tomorrow. [01:34:02.840 --> 01:34:03.840] Thank you. [01:34:04.840 --> 01:34:05.840] Yes, sir. Bye-bye. [01:34:06.840 --> 01:34:10.840] All right, now we have Truth Raider in Oregon. Raider, what can we do for you? [01:34:11.840 --> 01:34:17.840] Good evening, Eddie. Thank you very much. Folks out there, I'm a believer that this works. [01:34:18.840 --> 01:34:24.840] I just used the Steps to Challenge in court, and sure enough, it stopped them in their tracks. [01:34:24.840 --> 01:34:32.840] The Steps to Challenge in court being when it's a civil infraction issue, correct? [01:34:33.840 --> 01:34:43.840] Correct, yeah. You were telling me if it's a civil issue, then it's a little easier than trying to fight their charges for attempting to charge me with crime or misdemeanor or any of the piece. [01:34:44.840 --> 01:34:49.840] Correct, because the initial stop to write you the citation in a civil infraction is illegal. [01:34:49.840 --> 01:34:53.840] There is no probable cause. There is no reasonable suspicion. [01:34:54.840 --> 01:34:59.840] Therefore, there can be no probable cause to make a stop in seizure of a person or their car. [01:35:00.840 --> 01:35:07.840] Everything they discover becomes illegally obtained information and evidence which can be suppressed under the fruit of the poison tree doctrine. [01:35:07.840 --> 01:35:21.840] Right, right. This is what I did. I went in there and I said those very things to a clerk requesting that I would like to have the traffic tickets dismissed at the traffic court. [01:35:22.840 --> 01:35:32.840] Now, the traffic court is separate from the last one, which was the circuit court, which was the case where they were trying to charge me with not presenting an ID to a police officer. [01:35:32.840 --> 01:35:45.840] So, it was part of that same traffic stop, all inclusive in the same traffic stop for the two alleged violations of driving while uninsured and driving without a license. [01:35:46.840 --> 01:35:58.840] Right. And then the third, yeah. So, I said, well, this is what you have to do. I'm paraphrasing the clerk. You have to write, you have to pretty much write a really nice letter to the traffic commissioner, I guess. [01:35:58.840 --> 01:36:02.840] Do we write letters to anyone, Raider? [01:36:03.840 --> 01:36:09.840] If anything is done, it's going to be certified and it's going to be... [01:36:10.840 --> 01:36:15.840] No, you're not answering my question. Do we write letters in cases? [01:36:15.840 --> 01:36:27.840] Well, that's the reason why I want to call you first. I don't know if that is the correct way to go or not. [01:36:28.840 --> 01:36:42.840] No, it's a motion to dismiss always. We treat everything as a court proceeding. We do motions to dismiss. How can this person she's talking about offer you any relief? [01:36:42.840 --> 01:36:55.840] What I ask them is I want to get these two tickets dismissed. Well, you have to write a letter to her requesting to see her in her courtroom in order to discuss that matter. [01:36:56.840 --> 01:36:58.840] Whose courtroom? [01:36:59.840 --> 01:37:05.840] This particular traffic commissioner that I went to see in January concerning the traffic charges. [01:37:05.840 --> 01:37:14.840] Okay. Well, they're right there. You've got your information. A traffic commissioner, not a judge. [01:37:15.840 --> 01:37:22.840] Right. Exactly. So I have to write something to give them something, correct? [01:37:23.840 --> 01:37:25.840] Yes, it's a motion to dismiss. [01:37:26.840 --> 01:37:31.840] Right. So I just write in there, I request or do I demand a motion to dismiss? [01:37:31.840 --> 01:37:46.840] I move for a dismissal of all charges on the following grounds. And then you state the grounds and pursue the Supreme Court ruling in such and such cases through the poison tree doctrine. [01:37:47.840 --> 01:37:58.840] The initial arrest and seizure was illegal. No probable cause, no reasonable suspicion. Civil infractions are not crimes. [01:37:58.840 --> 01:38:05.840] Okay. I thought you won this already. Why are you asking me how to do this? Have you already done this? [01:38:06.840 --> 01:38:21.840] Well, this is concerning the traffic charges that they convicted me of in January. The one that I got dismissed was the so-called criminal charge of not presenting a license to a police officer when requested. [01:38:21.840 --> 01:38:33.840] It was the same stop though, all part of the same traffic stop. And as you said last week, anything in that traffic stop is all inclusive and subsequent to dismissal as well. [01:38:34.840 --> 01:38:45.840] Yeah, they never had original jurisdiction. That's your key thing right there. No original jurisdiction, no crime. The initial stop and arrest was illegal. [01:38:45.840 --> 01:38:54.840] Well, you weren't arrested, you were detained. Objection, detained for a civil infraction, which is also illegal. [01:38:55.840 --> 01:39:11.840] He stated clearly under duress, I complied and stepped out of my pickup truck, turned around, put my hands behind my back and put me in handcuffs and said, you are under arrest for driving while suspended. That's his very words. [01:39:11.840 --> 01:39:25.840] Okay, that's still not the issue here. He stopped you under false pretenses. He had no authority to stop you for the initial infraction. [01:39:25.840 --> 01:39:41.840] Correct. So that's what they want me to do. So I'll do that tomorrow. I'll go in and say, I'm requesting a dismissal of all charges. [01:39:42.840 --> 01:39:46.840] No, I'm not requesting. I am moving for a dismissal of all charges. [01:39:46.840 --> 01:39:59.840] Okay, moving is the key word to dismiss. Except you say move, not moving. I hereby move that all charges be dismissed and blah, blah, blah. [01:39:59.840 --> 01:40:16.840] Okay, hereby move is proper semantics to use. Okay, now in your seminar material packet, which I'm planning on purchasing, does it have all the other forms or the requirement or the necessary forms? [01:40:17.840 --> 01:40:26.840] There's nothing in there dealing with civil infractions, but there is an example of how to write one or at least the information it has to contain on my blog site. [01:40:26.840 --> 01:40:41.840] Okay, because the next step after that is to go back to that circuit court and try to file, I guess, what is it called? You've been discussing with another caller called Title 42? [01:40:42.840 --> 01:40:45.840] That's a federal lawsuit, yeah. [01:40:46.840 --> 01:40:51.840] Federal lawsuit, okay. So do I start with a state lawsuit, state and county lawsuit first? [01:40:51.840 --> 01:41:03.840] You can sue in both of them at the same time if you can afford to file in both of them. But if you sue in the Fed and not the state, you will not get to go back to the state. [01:41:04.840 --> 01:41:11.840] Okay. So what's the best course of action, move to file it against the state? [01:41:11.840 --> 01:41:22.840] Again, I don't know because I don't know what your financial situation with it is. You're going to have to pay the filing fee at either one of them unless you get a declared indigent to do it. [01:41:23.840 --> 01:41:39.840] Yes, I'm working on the informal properties of Oregon waiver. Okay, so I'm going to start with the state first. And my question is how would I word that? How would I... [01:41:39.840 --> 01:41:47.840] If you need to know how to write a lawsuit, Raider, you're going to need jurisdictionary. I can't tell you how to write a suit in 10 minutes on air. [01:41:48.840 --> 01:41:51.840] Okay, good. All right, jurisdictionary. So... [01:41:52.840 --> 01:42:02.840] Now remember, jurisdictionary teaches you how to do lawsuits. It does not teach you how to do a Title 42. Title 42 is a different animal. It's similar, but it isn't the same. [01:42:02.840 --> 01:42:12.840] Like I told the caller earlier, you need to read Title 42 lawsuits that one so you'll know how to write one properly. [01:42:13.840 --> 01:42:23.840] Don't write or read just any one that was filed because they may not state their causes properly and may have been dismissed. You need one that one. [01:42:23.840 --> 01:42:31.840] And it needs to be as similar to your issues as possible so that you can mimic it as much as possible. [01:42:32.840 --> 01:42:41.840] Correct. Correct. I want to be able to use... It's very key to have everything correct or they'll have any excuse at all to throw out the case. [01:42:41.840 --> 01:42:55.840] Yes, they will. In any case, the information that's relevant to doing what you need to do is in the article, things to know about civil infractions if your state has them, on my blog site, [01:42:55.840 --> 01:43:11.840] toweloflaw.wordpress.com. T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W dot wordpress.com. Wordpress.com. That's the information to start off with. [01:43:11.840 --> 01:43:24.840] Start off with Jurisdictionary. Now, that's what Michael Mears is proposing, correct? No. No. That's Dr. Grant, or Graze, I'm sorry. Dr. Graze, Jurisdictionary, the 30-year attorney out of Florida. [01:43:25.840 --> 01:43:34.840] Okay. Dr. Graze. And he's pretty thorough. He covers everything you approve of. Everything except how to actually sue a government official. [01:43:34.840 --> 01:43:45.840] It doesn't cover how to avoid 12 B-6 dismissals in government cases, and it doesn't deal with 1982 specifically. So that's why you need to research those separately from them. [01:43:46.840 --> 01:43:56.840] Okay. All right. Can you handle it from there, or do I have to deal more on the other side? No, no. I think I'm pretty good there. [01:43:57.840 --> 01:43:58.840] All right, folks. We'll be right back. [01:43:58.840 --> 01:44:06.840] You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics? Sorry. Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve? What? [01:44:07.840 --> 01:44:17.840] If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity. Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age. [01:44:18.840 --> 01:44:23.840] I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television. [01:44:23.840 --> 01:44:28.840] Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope. [01:44:29.840 --> 01:44:34.840] The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover. [01:44:35.840 --> 01:44:41.840] And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested. [01:44:41.840 --> 01:44:53.840] So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com. [01:44:54.840 --> 01:44:58.840] Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning. [01:44:58.840 --> 01:45:14.840] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [01:45:15.840 --> 01:45:21.840] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:21.840 --> 01:45:27.840] Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too. [01:45:28.840 --> 01:45:33.840] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. [01:45:34.840 --> 01:45:42.840] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:42.840 --> 01:45:51.840] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more. [01:45:51.840 --> 01:46:12.840] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:21.840 --> 01:46:36.840] Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio and we are now in the last segment of the Monday night show and I hope so far everything's gone as everyone's expected. [01:46:37.840 --> 01:46:41.840] Alright, we have Doug in Wisconsin. Doug, what can we do for you? [01:46:41.840 --> 01:46:53.840] Yes, I called last week and got a pull over by State Patrol for a law abuffler. [01:46:54.840 --> 01:47:06.840] Ended up going through your script kind of and ended up with no insurance ticket. [01:47:06.840 --> 01:47:12.840] You asked me to look up the statutes and send them to you and call in today. [01:47:13.840 --> 01:47:15.840] Did you send them to me? [01:47:16.840 --> 01:47:17.840] Yes. [01:47:18.840 --> 01:47:19.840] Okay. [01:47:20.840 --> 01:47:21.840] I do have them in front of me as well. [01:47:22.840 --> 01:47:24.840] And what email address did you send them to me under? [01:47:25.840 --> 01:47:27.840] Eti at Rule of Law. [01:47:28.840 --> 01:47:30.840] No, no, no, not my address, yours. [01:47:31.840 --> 01:47:32.840] Oh, I'm sorry. [01:47:32.840 --> 01:47:36.840] Just give me the first part of it. [01:47:37.840 --> 01:47:38.840] Say again? [01:47:39.840 --> 01:47:40.840] SPN. [01:47:41.840 --> 01:47:42.840] Okay, I got it. [01:47:43.840 --> 01:47:44.840] Never mind. [01:47:45.840 --> 01:47:46.840] You don't have to give me the whole thing. [01:47:47.840 --> 01:47:48.840] I want to publicize it for you. [01:47:49.840 --> 01:47:52.840] Let's see. [01:47:53.840 --> 01:47:54.840] Okay. [01:47:55.840 --> 01:47:58.840] Yes, I read this already. [01:47:59.840 --> 01:48:00.840] Okay. [01:48:00.840 --> 01:48:01.840] All right. [01:48:02.840 --> 01:48:03.840] What's the question? [01:48:04.840 --> 01:48:12.840] Well, I asked how to proceed last week and you asked me to read the statutes and get back with you. [01:48:13.840 --> 01:48:25.840] And basically, we know that the stop to begin with and everything afterwards was sort of the poison tree, so to speak, [01:48:25.840 --> 01:48:29.840] because the initial stop was unlawful to begin with. [01:48:30.840 --> 01:48:36.840] That's kind of where we were going and you asked me to do a motion for discovery for the tapes, [01:48:37.840 --> 01:48:41.840] which I did a couple days after we talked. [01:48:42.840 --> 01:48:50.840] So I guess I have a date, about three weeks. [01:48:50.840 --> 01:49:01.840] So I'm wondering, I guess the scenario if I get the tapes or if I don't, how we should proceed before the court date. [01:49:02.840 --> 01:49:15.840] Well, this set of statutes was originally enacted under the 1983 Senate Bill 604, 1983 Wisconsin Act 243, [01:49:15.840 --> 01:49:20.840] April 20th and 26th of 1984. [01:49:21.840 --> 01:49:25.840] That's your original amendment to the statute. [01:49:26.840 --> 01:49:30.840] It's not the original law that the statute is based on. [01:49:31.840 --> 01:49:34.840] So you need to do the research backtracking this. [01:49:35.840 --> 01:49:36.840] Okay. [01:49:36.840 --> 01:49:47.840] The problem is, is I don't see information within this bill that gives us the back direction for the original law. [01:49:48.840 --> 01:49:52.840] So you're going to have to figure out how to research that and find it, which means you're probably going to need a law library. [01:49:53.840 --> 01:50:01.840] And it'll probably say something to the effect of making it obvious that it wasn't to be applied the way it was applied, which you're getting at. [01:50:01.840 --> 01:50:10.840] It's possible. The actual purpose of the law will determine what the application of the statute is. [01:50:11.840 --> 01:50:16.840] Okay. [01:50:16.840 --> 01:50:30.840] Let's see. 34739. Let's see. [01:50:31.840 --> 01:50:33.840] 10, 11. [01:50:34.840 --> 01:50:39.840] Yeah, you're going to need to backtrack that further than what this is going to give us here. [01:50:39.840 --> 01:50:45.840] Let's see. [01:50:46.840 --> 01:50:55.840] The first thing is, what is a person defined as? What is operate defined as? What is highway defined as? What does motor vehicle subject to registration mean? [01:50:56.840 --> 01:51:04.840] See, that's the thing. When it says motor vehicle subject to registration, that tells you right there that there must be some that are not required to be registered. Why? [01:51:04.840 --> 01:51:09.840] And the reason is because they're not subject to this statute. [01:51:10.840 --> 01:51:19.840] And the reason they're not is because they're not in the subject matter to which the statute applies, because they're not in the subject matter to which the actual law applies. [01:51:20.840 --> 01:51:25.840] You've got to find out what that subject matter is. [01:51:26.840 --> 01:51:31.840] No, let's not assume anything. Never do that. [01:51:31.840 --> 01:51:43.840] But for the sake of the phone call here, can we assume one of the scenarios is that this does not apply to myself? [01:51:44.840 --> 01:51:55.840] There is the possibility that it does not apply to anyone except those engaged in some form of commercial use of the highways. [01:51:55.840 --> 01:52:02.840] And in which case you would enter a motion to dismiss based on that? [01:52:03.840 --> 01:52:12.840] Absolutely. Lack of jurisdiction. If the subject matter does not exist, subject matter and impersonal jurisdiction does not exist. [01:52:13.840 --> 01:52:17.840] Therefore, jurisdiction at all does not exist. [01:52:17.840 --> 01:52:24.840] See, the two jurisdictions they cannot live without, subject matter and personal. [01:52:25.840 --> 01:52:29.840] They have to have jurisdiction over the subject matter. [01:52:30.840 --> 01:52:37.840] Well, if the subject matter they're claiming jurisdiction over is operating a motor vehicle with a loud muffler, [01:52:37.840 --> 01:52:51.840] and yet that subject matter under which that sits is transportation, then without proving transportation, they can't prove the underlying subject matter. [01:52:52.840 --> 01:52:58.840] Because it's completely dependent upon the existence of transportation to exist at all. [01:52:58.840 --> 01:53:08.840] You also asked me to request tapes from the law enforcement agency as well as the... [01:53:09.840 --> 01:53:17.840] If you're going to use them in court, yes. But until you know what you're using them for, you don't know if they're going to help you or not. [01:53:18.840 --> 01:53:25.840] Well, the thing is I won't be able to talk to you for another week is why I'm doing some hypotheticals here. [01:53:25.840 --> 01:53:29.840] Well, the thing about it is your argument is not going to be what's in the videos. [01:53:30.840 --> 01:53:36.840] Your argument is going to be that they were attempting to apply a statute to you that doesn't apply to you [01:53:37.840 --> 01:53:42.840] because you're not engaged in the regulated activity that the statute and the underlying law apply to. [01:53:42.840 --> 01:53:58.840] Couldn't the person just put into the record a certified copy of the original legislative intent law [01:53:59.840 --> 01:54:06.840] that basically says what we're talking about right now, and then they'd see that this person knows a little bit, [01:54:07.840 --> 01:54:09.840] we don't want to bother with them, so we'll let them, we'll dismiss it. [01:54:09.840 --> 01:54:17.840] You're asking me to tell you what they might do. The answer to your question is maybe that would, maybe that wouldn't. [01:54:18.840 --> 01:54:24.840] You don't know. They may decide to see how much you do know and if you know how to use what you think you know. [01:54:25.840 --> 01:54:30.840] There's no way to tell what they're going to do. That's why you better know what to do regardless. [01:54:30.840 --> 01:54:43.840] What you need to do is get a certified copy of the original bill's caption or title, whatever it's called in your state, okay, [01:54:44.840 --> 01:54:49.840] and the constitutional sections that says that caption or title must contain the subject matter, [01:54:50.840 --> 01:54:55.840] that a bill can only deal with one subject at a time and here's what that subject is, [01:54:55.840 --> 01:55:02.840] and everything they're doing under the code must relate to that subject matter, [01:55:03.840 --> 01:55:07.840] which means they must allege and prove the existence of that subject matter, [01:55:08.840 --> 01:55:12.840] and if they fail to do that, then it's impossible to prove the underlying offense, [01:55:13.840 --> 01:55:22.840] because the underlying offense cannot be committed without the subject matter itself being an issue, an elemental issue. [01:55:22.840 --> 01:55:29.840] Okay, so you asked me to get the tapes, but apparently the tapes aren't... [01:55:30.840 --> 01:55:33.840] No, no, no, no, no. It depends on what you're attempting to do. [01:55:34.840 --> 01:55:38.840] I'm not saying the tapes won't be useful, but it depends upon what argument you're going with [01:55:39.840 --> 01:55:41.840] and what evidence you're going to produce as to whether or not they will. [01:55:42.840 --> 01:55:46.840] If for nothing else, they may be good for you to use to sue somebody, [01:55:46.840 --> 01:55:53.840] but they may not necessarily help you in this case if you can find the information we're talking about. [01:55:54.840 --> 01:56:01.840] One more thing really quickly is that the county said that only the law enforcement agency would be able to produce that, [01:56:02.840 --> 01:56:04.840] but you said that they have separate possibilities. [01:56:05.840 --> 01:56:11.840] That's correct. Whoever the law enforcement agency is that did the recording is going to be who has it. [01:56:11.840 --> 01:56:17.840] Who did you ask for it from or were you planning on asking for it from? [01:56:18.840 --> 01:56:22.840] The court where I'd appear and also the... [01:56:23.840 --> 01:56:27.840] You can ask for it from the court, because the court wouldn't have it. The court is not the custodian of record. [01:56:28.840 --> 01:56:31.840] The district attorney or the prosecutor? [01:56:32.840 --> 01:56:37.840] The district attorney may not plan on using it. Therefore, he wouldn't have it necessarily either. [01:56:37.840 --> 01:56:42.840] Well, I'm just mentioning what you asked me to get it from. [01:56:43.840 --> 01:56:50.840] No, no, no. I asked you to get information from him as to what evidence he intends to use against you in this case, [01:56:51.840 --> 01:56:59.840] because you have a right to see and or obtain copies of any of that evidence, whatever it may be. [01:56:59.840 --> 01:57:06.840] He may have the video, he may not have the video, but from him you're going to have to get it through discovery. [01:57:07.840 --> 01:57:10.840] You may have to get it through discovery from the police agency, [01:57:11.840 --> 01:57:17.840] but you are also generally able to get that stuff through a public information request as well from the agency. [01:57:18.840 --> 01:57:23.840] But whoever produced it is generally the one that is the custodian of record for it. [01:57:23.840 --> 01:57:34.840] That will be the law enforcement agency, not the DA, not the county attorney, not the court, not the county itself, the law enforcement agency. [01:57:35.840 --> 01:57:42.840] Real quickly, if you weren't able to get this in time before the court date, what would you do, try to get an extension or something? [01:57:43.840 --> 01:57:46.840] Do you file a motion for an extension of time or a continuous? Yes. [01:57:47.840 --> 01:57:49.840] Okay, I'll let the next person come on. [01:57:49.840 --> 01:57:52.840] We're out of time, there is no next person. [01:57:53.840 --> 01:57:54.840] All right. [01:57:55.840 --> 01:57:56.840] All right, Doug, thanks for calling in. [01:57:57.840 --> 01:58:00.840] Rob, I'm sorry, man, you got on just a little bit too late with the callers I had. [01:58:01.840 --> 01:58:06.840] Better luck next week or if you got something more pressing, try to get in with Randy on Thursday or Friday. [01:58:07.840 --> 01:58:13.840] All right, everybody, I want to thank you so much for calling in, for listening in, for helping us out with the finances and stuff. [01:58:13.840 --> 01:58:19.840] Please, whenever you can, whatever you can, we're desperate for survival around here on funds, always are. [01:58:20.840 --> 01:58:22.840] So please give us a hand where you can. [01:58:23.840 --> 01:58:27.840] I want to thank you all for being out there and supporting us to the best of your ability and for listening in to this show. [01:58:28.840 --> 01:58:30.840] And thank you for making it the popular show that it is. [01:58:31.840 --> 01:58:32.840] I really appreciate that. [01:58:33.840 --> 01:58:34.840] All right, folks, you all have a great week. [01:58:34.840 --> 01:58:49.840] Good night and God bless. [01:58:49.840 --> 01:59:07.840] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:59:07.840 --> 01:59:19.840] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.840 --> 01:59:29.840] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.840 --> 01:59:31.840] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:31.840 --> 01:59:39.840] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:40.840 --> 01:59:48.840] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:48.840 --> 02:00:00.840] Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.