[00:00.000 --> 00:05.840]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:05.840 --> 00:13.480]  bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.480 --> 00:21.560]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.560 --> 00:28.120]  Markets for Wednesday, March 9, 2016 are currently trending with gold at $1,252.65 an ounce,
[00:28.120 --> 00:34.520]  silver at $15.29 an ounce, Texas crude at $36.50 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:34.520 --> 00:42.840]  sitting at about $411 U.S. currency.
[00:42.840 --> 00:48.360]  Today in history, the year 1961, the first animal safely returned from space after completing
[00:48.360 --> 00:53.800]  one full orbit around the earth in Sputnik 9, a doggie named Ternushka or Blackie returned
[00:53.800 --> 00:59.840]  from the heavens, today in history.
[00:59.840 --> 01:04.040]  In recent news, Tayrad Pugh, a U.S. Air Force veteran, was found guilty today of attempting
[01:04.040 --> 01:05.760]  to join the Islamic State.
[01:05.760 --> 01:10.280]  After a week-long trial at a Brooklyn federal court, a jury found Tayrad guilty of attempting
[01:10.280 --> 01:15.380]  to provide material support to ISIS and guilty of obstruction for destroying four e-storage
[01:15.380 --> 01:17.200]  drives after his detention in Turkey.
[01:17.200 --> 01:19.280]  Pugh is set to be sentenced in September.
[01:19.280 --> 01:23.440]  Pugh's defense lawyer is arguing that all he did was express repugnant views about the
[01:23.440 --> 01:27.720]  Islamic State on Facebook and watched dozens of the group's recruitment videos, and that
[01:27.720 --> 01:31.600]  he was only traveling to Turkey to find work, not to become a jihadist.
[01:31.600 --> 01:36.040]  However, prosecutors are presenting a letter he apparently drafted to his Egyptian wife,
[01:36.040 --> 01:40.000]  which was found on his laptop in which he vowed to fight for Islam.
[01:40.000 --> 01:44.840]  When detained in Istanbul, he apparently had a black face mask, a map depicting Islamic
[01:44.840 --> 01:50.480]  State's stronghold in Syria, and a chart of the border crossings between Turkey and Syria.
[01:50.480 --> 01:56.120]  Pugh served as an avionics specialist in the Air Force from 1986 to 1990, and later worked
[01:56.120 --> 02:05.440]  as an army contractor in Iraq from 2009 to 2010.
[02:05.440 --> 02:09.360]  Toyota recently showed off a new device that could dramatically assist the visually impaired
[02:09.360 --> 02:11.160]  to better navigate their surroundings.
[02:11.160 --> 02:15.280]  Called Project Blade an informational device to bridge the gap between a cane or a guide
[02:15.280 --> 02:19.680]  dog, Toyota has been testing various prototypes of the wearable device with individuals from
[02:19.680 --> 02:23.160]  the visually impaired community for the past three years, and though the details of the
[02:23.160 --> 02:27.160]  project were released this week, no official timeline has been set for the release.
[02:27.160 --> 02:31.160]  The automaker plans incorporating mapping, object identification, and facial mapping
[02:31.160 --> 02:33.760]  technologies into Blade in the future.
[02:33.760 --> 02:38.720]  Doug Moore, manager of partner robotics at Toyota, told ABC that Toyota is thinking about
[02:38.720 --> 02:42.120]  quality of life for individuals and how to impact society.
[02:42.120 --> 02:46.560]  The low-star lowdown is currently looking to build some ad space to see if a product
[02:46.560 --> 02:51.560]  or service you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257.
[02:51.560 --> 03:00.560]  This is Rick Roady with your lowdown for March 9th, 2016.
[03:00.560 --> 03:24.560]  Really, man, come on, 6 o'clock news says somebody been shot, somebody's been abused,
[03:24.560 --> 03:31.560]  somebody blew up a building, somebody stole a car, somebody got away, somebody didn't
[03:31.560 --> 03:38.560]  get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far.
[03:38.560 --> 03:46.560]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day, son, a man had to answer for the wig that he'd
[03:46.560 --> 03:53.560]  done, take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them bad boys in
[03:53.560 --> 04:00.560]  Zion Street, for all the people to see.
[04:00.560 --> 04:06.560]  That justice is one thing you should always find, you gotta saddle up your boys, you gotta
[04:06.560 --> 04:13.560]  draw hard lines, when the guns won't settle, we'll sing a victory tune and we'll all be
[04:13.560 --> 04:21.560]  back at the horse and moose, we'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing,
[04:21.560 --> 04:31.560]  whiskey for my men, beer for my horses.
[04:31.560 --> 04:35.560]  Alright, folks, good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your
[04:35.560 --> 04:39.560]  host Eddie Craig, we are live tonight, this is not a replay.
[04:39.560 --> 04:45.560]  Alright, just to let y'all know, the phones are open and I am taking calls right off the
[04:45.560 --> 04:50.560]  bat, but while I'm waiting on people to get in line for the calls, there is something
[04:50.560 --> 04:58.560]  that occurred to me and started me thinking today, dealing with the issues of in this
[04:58.560 --> 05:00.560]  state.
[05:00.560 --> 05:07.560]  And what it comes down to is when you look at 45.019A of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
[05:07.560 --> 05:15.560]  one of the requisites of a valid criminal complaint is that the complaint specifically
[05:15.560 --> 05:23.560]  stated violation of a law of this state, which goes to something that I've talked about before
[05:23.560 --> 05:27.560]  that I discovered is about what the legislature has attempted to do in violation of the Texas
[05:27.560 --> 05:33.560]  Constitution, which is authorize ordinances at counties and municipal levels and other
[05:33.560 --> 05:41.560]  rules and regulations and things unenacted by the legislature, not enacted by the legislature,
[05:41.560 --> 05:47.560]  to be considered to be laws of this state.
[05:47.560 --> 05:57.560]  When you look in the codes, there are several sections that define the term, the individual
[05:57.560 --> 06:00.560]  term law in and of itself, law.
[06:00.560 --> 06:09.560]  And I believe there's a total of four that define that term as a scope beyond that chapter
[06:09.560 --> 06:12.560]  or code.
[06:12.560 --> 06:20.560]  And it always says these things, ordinances, regulations, school board policies, and blah,
[06:20.560 --> 06:28.560]  blah, blah, are within the definition of law in relation to this state.
[06:28.560 --> 06:29.560]  Okay?
[06:29.560 --> 06:37.560]  So when a criminal complaint says that you violated some law, the question now becomes,
[06:37.560 --> 06:46.560]  are you accusing me of violating a definition of law, as is in the code, which definition
[06:46.560 --> 06:58.560]  is in violation of the constitutional delegated powers to create law, or is it an actual law
[06:58.560 --> 07:02.560]  enacted by the legislature that you're pointing to?
[07:02.560 --> 07:04.560]  See, here's the problem and why I ask this.
[07:04.560 --> 07:14.560]  If a complaint is not valid, unless it specifically cites a law of this state, and this state
[07:14.560 --> 07:23.560]  by constitutional requirement can only mean the Texas Republic and the properly constitutional
[07:23.560 --> 07:32.560]  laws enacted under the legislature of the Texas Republic, then every criminal complaint
[07:32.560 --> 07:39.560]  is invalid on its face if it charges you with a violation of an ordinance, a regulation,
[07:39.560 --> 07:51.560]  a rule, a policy, or a statute, because none of those things are enacted by the legislature.
[07:51.560 --> 07:56.560]  They may be approved by the legislature, but they are not the actual law.
[07:56.560 --> 08:04.560]  They are the agency reinterpretation of the underlying law.
[08:04.560 --> 08:11.560]  And when a complaint alleges of an offense in association with something that is not
[08:11.560 --> 08:16.560]  a law, the complaint is invalid on its face.
[08:16.560 --> 08:26.560]  So by challenging the substance of the complaint for violating the statutory requirements of
[08:26.560 --> 08:33.560]  45.019A as not citing an offense of a law of this state as that state is required to
[08:33.560 --> 08:42.560]  exist under the constitution rather than the statutory definition, the court never has
[08:42.560 --> 08:44.560]  jurisdiction invoked.
[08:44.560 --> 08:48.560]  An invalid complaint does not invoke their jurisdiction.
[08:48.560 --> 08:53.560]  It can't.
[08:53.560 --> 09:00.560]  And the court cannot move forward without providing a legal lawful basis for why it's
[09:00.560 --> 09:07.560]  moving forward after that challenge has been made.
[09:07.560 --> 09:12.560]  So these are things that we need to understand about their wordplay, folks.
[09:12.560 --> 09:18.560]  Their wordplay is meant to steal your right of due process out from under you without
[09:18.560 --> 09:25.560]  making you any the wiser to the fact that this is what they're doing.
[09:25.560 --> 09:30.560]  But check out Code of Criminal Procedure 45.019A and see if it does not specifically state
[09:30.560 --> 09:35.560]  that the complaint must allege a violation or an offense under a law of this state.
[09:35.560 --> 09:42.560]  Question what this state actually means in relation to the constitution versus the statutory
[09:42.560 --> 09:46.560]  definition of law itself.
[09:46.560 --> 09:53.560]  Because most of the things listed in the definition of law would be considered violations of the
[09:53.560 --> 10:00.560]  Texas Constitution's delegation of powers if it actually was considered to be a law of
[10:00.560 --> 10:03.560]  this state.
[10:03.560 --> 10:10.560]  Therefore, the allegation made in the complaint is not facially valid or sound because it
[10:10.560 --> 10:17.560]  does not cite an offense under the law.
[10:17.560 --> 10:18.560]  All right.
[10:18.560 --> 10:22.560]  Just something for all of you to be considering, the tricks they play and the words they use
[10:22.560 --> 10:24.560]  to play those tricks.
[10:24.560 --> 10:25.560]  Wow.
[10:25.560 --> 10:26.560]  Now good.
[10:26.560 --> 10:27.560]  We've got people up on the board here.
[10:27.560 --> 10:28.560]  All right.
[10:28.560 --> 10:29.560]  Let's start our list of callers.
[10:29.560 --> 10:32.560]  Right now we've got Larry in Arizona.
[10:32.560 --> 10:34.560]  Larry, what can we do for you?
[10:34.560 --> 10:36.560]  Good evening, Eddie.
[10:36.560 --> 10:37.560]  Evening.
[10:37.560 --> 10:40.560]  I finished my trial.
[10:40.560 --> 10:41.560]  Are you there?
[10:41.560 --> 10:42.560]  Yeah, I'm here.
[10:42.560 --> 10:43.560]  Okay.
[10:43.560 --> 10:44.560]  Okay.
[10:44.560 --> 10:47.560]  I'm done with my trial and on to the appeal.
[10:47.560 --> 10:54.560]  And when I go to argue jurisdiction in the appeal, do I just need to say, look, I challenged
[10:54.560 --> 10:56.560]  jurisdiction and it wasn't proven?
[10:56.560 --> 11:02.560]  Yeah, you need to say this court lacks jurisdiction because the original trial court never had
[11:02.560 --> 11:03.560]  it.
[11:03.560 --> 11:09.560]  If they never proved it up on the record and never shown through evidence that they had
[11:09.560 --> 11:16.560]  jurisdiction, then this court can't possibly have it because you're not the court of original
[11:16.560 --> 11:17.560]  jurisdiction.
[11:17.560 --> 11:18.560]  Okay.
[11:18.560 --> 11:19.560]  Okay.
[11:19.560 --> 11:22.560]  So I just, okay, I needed to know that.
[11:22.560 --> 11:28.560]  And then, okay, I went down to the state capitol and I found the original law that put our
[11:28.560 --> 11:32.560]  motor vehicle division into place.
[11:32.560 --> 11:40.560]  But I cannot find in there where it definitively says you don't need a driver's license.
[11:40.560 --> 11:41.560]  You won't.
[11:41.560 --> 11:43.560]  And why would it definitively say that?
[11:43.560 --> 11:52.560]  Does Arizona constitution require a legislative bill to have a title or caption?
[11:52.560 --> 11:55.560]  To the best of my knowledge, yes, it does.
[11:55.560 --> 12:02.560]  Well, is the best of your knowledge based upon what your state constitution says?
[12:02.560 --> 12:05.560]  I just can't remember exactly what it...
[12:05.560 --> 12:06.560]  Okay.
[12:06.560 --> 12:09.560]  Well, you need to verify whether it is a requirement or not.
[12:09.560 --> 12:16.560]  And then whether or not in addition to having a title or caption, is it required and is
[12:16.560 --> 12:24.560]  the legislature mandated by the constitution to ensure it contains the subject to which
[12:24.560 --> 12:27.560]  the bill relates?
[12:27.560 --> 12:36.560]  If all of that is true, then the bill must tell you what the subject is at the very beginning.
[12:36.560 --> 12:44.560]  And if it says relating to, and then it tells you what the to is, that's your subject.
[12:44.560 --> 12:52.560]  And I'm willing to bet you dollars to donuts, the subject says transportation.
[12:52.560 --> 12:59.560]  Or it will say commercial occupation or commercial activity or commercial use or something of
[12:59.560 --> 13:00.560]  that nature.
[13:00.560 --> 13:04.560]  Almost guaranteed it's going to say that.
[13:04.560 --> 13:06.560]  Okay.
[13:06.560 --> 13:11.560]  It definitely said you don't have to be registered unless you're engaged in transportation.
[13:11.560 --> 13:12.560]  Right.
[13:12.560 --> 13:17.560]  Which means most likely that's exactly what the bill's subject matter is.
[13:17.560 --> 13:18.560]  Okay.
[13:18.560 --> 13:19.560]  Okay.
[13:19.560 --> 13:20.560]  I'll have to go through and reread it then.
[13:20.560 --> 13:27.560]  But what you need is certified copies of that bill and certified copies of those constitutional
[13:27.560 --> 13:33.560]  provisions that say that this is the subject, this is what the bill is required to have.
[13:33.560 --> 13:35.560]  Here is exactly what the bill says.
[13:35.560 --> 13:40.560]  The Secretary of State says this is a certified copy of what was enacted.
[13:40.560 --> 13:43.560]  Right here, transportation.
[13:43.560 --> 13:49.560]  Now what you have to find out is whether or not that bill defines transportation.
[13:49.560 --> 13:55.560]  And whether or not in addition to the definition for transportation, it also contains one for
[13:55.560 --> 13:57.560]  the term carrier.
[13:57.560 --> 14:01.560]  Now you want the individual term definitions.
[14:01.560 --> 14:06.560]  You don't want to say, or for instance, you don't want commercial transportation.
[14:06.560 --> 14:08.560]  You want just transportation.
[14:08.560 --> 14:16.560]  You don't want motor vehicle carrier or commercial motor vehicle carrier or commercial carrier.
[14:16.560 --> 14:20.560]  You want just the term carrier defined.
[14:20.560 --> 14:27.560]  If it doesn't define those two terms individually, then what it's giving you is a class of that
[14:27.560 --> 14:31.560]  term instead, and you still need to define that term.
[14:31.560 --> 14:37.560]  And then the hierarchy in law for doing that is, does the statute or law itself do so?
[14:37.560 --> 14:40.560]  And we're saying no, it doesn't.
[14:40.560 --> 14:47.560]  Then is there a legal precedent or an industry standard definition for the term?
[14:47.560 --> 14:50.560]  And if so, that's what we use.
[14:50.560 --> 14:56.560]  And if there isn't, then and only then do we get to the common English vernacular.
[14:56.560 --> 15:01.560]  Now, word to the wise, if they try to tell you that they're using the common English
[15:01.560 --> 15:06.560]  vernacular, the common English vernacular contains an addendum, as does every Black's
[15:06.560 --> 15:14.560]  Law dictionary after the sixth edition, that says a person may be in, or something about
[15:14.560 --> 15:22.560]  a person is in transportation when operating his own vehicle, or a driver when operating
[15:22.560 --> 15:24.560]  his own vehicle.
[15:24.560 --> 15:29.560]  Can you think of a scenario where that part of that definition in relation to what the
[15:29.560 --> 15:36.560]  other parts of that definition say would actually hold true?
[15:36.560 --> 15:46.560]  How can someone be a driver who is operating their private conveyance as a vehicle or motor
[15:46.560 --> 15:50.560]  vehicle or commercial motor vehicle?
[15:50.560 --> 15:52.560]  Well, if you're a taxi driver.
[15:52.560 --> 15:54.560]  Correct, and you own the taxi, right?
[15:54.560 --> 15:55.560]  Yeah.
[15:55.560 --> 15:59.560]  Or if you're a truck driver and you own the truck.
[15:59.560 --> 16:00.560]  Okay.
[16:00.560 --> 16:02.560]  That is what that definition is playing into.
[16:02.560 --> 16:07.560]  Do not let them try to convince you that that suddenly expands that definition to include
[16:07.560 --> 16:13.560]  everybody in a car, because it doesn't.
[16:13.560 --> 16:17.560]  Okay.
[16:17.560 --> 16:23.560]  And the last question I had is, during my trial, just to mess with the judge a little
[16:23.560 --> 16:28.560]  bit, I asked him if it was a court of record, and he said no.
[16:28.560 --> 16:33.560]  I asked him if it was a common law court, and boy, when I asked him that, he got kind
[16:33.560 --> 16:34.560]  of upset.
[16:34.560 --> 16:40.560]  He started telling me, well, these books behind me that state-revised statutes are what this
[16:40.560 --> 16:41.560]  court goes by.
[16:41.560 --> 16:42.560]  Right.
[16:42.560 --> 16:47.560]  Yeah, they don't like common law courts because it deprives them of a lot of power.
[16:47.560 --> 16:50.560]  Hang on, Larry, I got to take a break, and then we'll finish you up on the other side
[16:50.560 --> 16:51.560]  when we get back.
[16:51.560 --> 16:55.560]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[16:55.560 --> 16:59.560]  We'll be right back.
[16:59.560 --> 17:04.560]  Did you know that the Logos Radio Network is a truly listener-supported radio network?
[17:04.560 --> 17:08.560]  On top of the on-air talent, producers and other hardworking individuals work behind
[17:08.560 --> 17:09.560]  the scenes.
[17:09.560 --> 17:13.560]  Logos Radio Network is kept on the air by the generous support of listeners like you,
[17:13.560 --> 17:18.560]  and we appreciate our loyal listeners making contributions every year on our annual fundraisers,
[17:18.560 --> 17:21.560]  which help keep the lights on and Logos Radio Network on the air.
[17:21.560 --> 17:25.560]  The 2016 fundraiser has been extended to March 17th.
[17:25.560 --> 17:28.560]  Hand on over to LogosRadioNetwork.com to make your contribution.
[17:28.560 --> 17:33.560]  Every $25 donation enters you for a chance to win prizes from Central Texas Gunworks,
[17:33.560 --> 17:38.560]  first prize being a Spikes Skull Lower Receiver, second prize being a Taurus Curve.
[17:38.560 --> 17:43.560]  And if you donate your $25 contribution early enough, you will also receive a complimentary jar
[17:43.560 --> 17:44.560]  of My Magic Mud.
[17:44.560 --> 17:49.560]  Donations by all major credit cards are accepted, as well as contributions by Bitcoin.
[17:49.560 --> 17:53.560]  The Logos Radio Network fundraiser now through March 17th.
[17:53.560 --> 17:57.560]  Hand on over to LogosRadioNetwork.com for more information and to donate to keep the
[17:57.560 --> 17:59.560]  Logos Radio Network on the air.
[17:59.560 --> 18:04.560]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:04.560 --> 18:08.560]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:08.560 --> 18:14.560]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[18:14.560 --> 18:20.560]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:20.560 --> 18:24.560]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[18:24.560 --> 18:26.560]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:26.560 --> 18:28.560]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:28.560 --> 18:33.560]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.560 --> 18:38.560]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.560 --> 18:40.560]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.560 --> 18:46.560]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[18:46.560 --> 18:49.560]  Or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.560 --> 18:51.560]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[18:51.560 --> 19:00.560]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.560 --> 19:10.560]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:10.560 --> 19:39.560]  All right, folks, we are back.
[19:39.560 --> 19:43.560]  This is Rule of Law Radio, our Monday night, March 14th show.
[19:43.560 --> 19:46.560]  And we are talking to Larry in Arizona.
[19:46.560 --> 19:49.560]  All right, Larry, please continue.
[19:49.560 --> 19:56.560]  Okay, so in our statutes, I mean, it does say that all courts in our state are common law courts
[19:56.560 --> 19:59.560]  unless they're repugnant to the Constitution.
[19:59.560 --> 20:03.560]  So is that something that we should try to use when we go into court?
[20:03.560 --> 20:06.560]  Well, the thing about it is every state's required to have a common law court.
[20:06.560 --> 20:12.560]  And the way that the attorneys try to get around admitting that that's not what they're doing
[20:12.560 --> 20:17.560]  is trying to tell you that the statutes now represent the common law,
[20:17.560 --> 20:22.560]  except instead of being unwritten the way it was, the statutes now make it written.
[20:22.560 --> 20:24.560]  That's baloney.
[20:24.560 --> 20:26.560]  It's not the same thing at all.
[20:26.560 --> 20:32.560]  What that would mean as a common law court is that they cannot apply a statute
[20:32.560 --> 20:36.560]  in a fashion that violates common law principles.
[20:36.560 --> 20:41.560]  For instance, these traffic citations, okay?
[20:41.560 --> 20:47.560]  If there is no injured party and there is no criminal intent
[20:47.560 --> 20:55.560]  that violates the common law principles that define a crime, okay?
[20:55.560 --> 21:05.560]  So them trying to charge you with an offense that violates common law principles is itself unconstitutional,
[21:05.560 --> 21:09.560]  if that's what your Constitution says they're required to be.
[21:09.560 --> 21:11.560]  You follow?
[21:11.560 --> 21:13.560]  Yes, yes.
[21:13.560 --> 21:17.560]  Okay, so that's one argument you need to be making, or you should have made.
[21:17.560 --> 21:20.560]  Now you can go back and make it again.
[21:20.560 --> 21:23.560]  Okay.
[21:23.560 --> 21:27.560]  Okay, yeah, I have another trial coming up here in a few weeks, so I can work on it for that.
[21:27.560 --> 21:35.560]  Yeah, but you need to argue the original jurisdiction of the court because no common law principle,
[21:35.560 --> 21:42.560]  no invocation of jurisdiction, because that would be an admission that the court is acting
[21:42.560 --> 21:47.560]  in an other than common law fashion, okay?
[21:47.560 --> 21:53.560]  If they say we have jurisdiction and we can do that and yet they violate common law principles,
[21:53.560 --> 22:03.560]  that is proof positive the court is not following its own state Constitution.
[22:03.560 --> 22:09.560]  And I don't know of any authority delegated to any court in any state that allows the court
[22:09.560 --> 22:14.560]  to suspend the people's right to access an affirmative defense
[22:14.560 --> 22:22.560]  or a right protection defined within or stated by the state Constitution.
[22:22.560 --> 22:26.560]  Any judge that tells me we don't use the Constitution here, it doesn't apply here,
[22:26.560 --> 22:30.560]  you can't talk about that here, we're not going to talk about that here,
[22:30.560 --> 22:37.560]  immediately gets a motion to disqualify because that judge just confessed to treason
[22:37.560 --> 22:45.560]  in open court before two or more witnesses.
[22:45.560 --> 22:50.560]  Okay, that's okay.
[22:50.560 --> 22:54.560]  Okay, I think that will wrap up my questions for this evening, Eddie, thank you.
[22:54.560 --> 22:56.560]  You're very welcome, good luck.
[22:56.560 --> 22:57.560]  Okay, thank you.
[22:57.560 --> 22:59.560]  You're welcome, bye-bye.
[22:59.560 --> 23:02.560]  All right, now we've got Truth Raider in Oregon.
[23:02.560 --> 23:08.560]  Raider, are you going to tell me something or are you going to educate us on something?
[23:08.560 --> 23:15.560]  I will tell you something and we'll discuss what's happening and then we're going to take it step by step
[23:15.560 --> 23:21.560]  the right way towards perhaps maybe having a chance to litigate
[23:21.560 --> 23:25.560]  and get compensation for what's taking place.
[23:25.560 --> 23:29.560]  Anyway, today my case was dismissed.
[23:29.560 --> 23:32.560]  Congratulations, which case?
[23:32.560 --> 23:37.560]  This case was the very last one, not the traffic violations,
[23:37.560 --> 23:46.560]  but this was not presenting a license to a police officer when demanded.
[23:46.560 --> 23:50.560]  And what arguments did you use in relation to that?
[23:50.560 --> 23:57.560]  I took the email that you sent me, all the stuff that the officer did not have,
[23:57.560 --> 24:02.560]  did not meet the criteria, did not have a warrant, didn't have any probable cause,
[24:02.560 --> 24:09.560]  no witnesses, nothing to have the basis to initiate the traffic stop in the first place.
[24:09.560 --> 24:10.560]  Congratulations.
[24:10.560 --> 24:14.560]  So you want a little common sense application and reading can do for one?
[24:14.560 --> 24:17.560]  Yes, indeed.
[24:17.560 --> 24:21.560]  Well, I presented that to him and to the court and to the judge in January
[24:21.560 --> 24:27.560]  for the traffic violations as far as driving well suspended and driving without insurance,
[24:27.560 --> 24:29.560]  those two particular charges.
[24:29.560 --> 24:33.560]  They didn't dismiss those, those I'm going to have to work on.
[24:33.560 --> 24:36.560]  Well, but you can challenge those as fruit of the poison tree.
[24:36.560 --> 24:42.560]  If the officer never had probable cause and those are related to the same stop,
[24:42.560 --> 24:47.560]  there is no way they can sustain those charges legitimately.
[24:47.560 --> 24:52.560]  And you need to make darn sure that you object to that as fruit of the poison tree
[24:52.560 --> 24:56.560]  for the appeals record if they attempt to continue.
[24:56.560 --> 25:00.560]  They cannot admit wrongdoing in the first instance
[25:00.560 --> 25:05.560]  and then declare they're going after you for everything after that anyway.
[25:05.560 --> 25:07.560]  Right.
[25:07.560 --> 25:12.560]  I think something's set in their mind because the prosecutor and the sheriff deputies,
[25:12.560 --> 25:14.560]  neither of them showed to court today.
[25:14.560 --> 25:19.560]  And this surprises me, not at all.
[25:19.560 --> 25:20.560]  All right.
[25:20.560 --> 25:27.560]  Well, if something was in that, you know, the phrases that you sent to me to state in court
[25:27.560 --> 25:33.560]  and to them must have sank in or something.
[25:33.560 --> 25:38.560]  Well, if it didn't, I'm sure the appellate court would have hammered it in.
[25:38.560 --> 25:39.560]  Right, right.
[25:39.560 --> 25:44.560]  Okay, so anyway, in the meantime, you know, not getting off topic here,
[25:44.560 --> 25:49.560]  but in the meantime, I went to that site that one gentleman called in a couple of weeks ago,
[25:49.560 --> 25:55.560]  recommended to checking out and for you to check out, usacommonlaw.com.
[25:55.560 --> 25:59.560]  I went to that site and it's a nice fancy site and they have every category there
[25:59.560 --> 26:03.560]  and they're willing to help me and call for free consultation and all that stuff.
[26:03.560 --> 26:04.560]  I gave them my number.
[26:04.560 --> 26:07.560]  I sent them an email and description of everything and I haven't heard back from them.
[26:07.560 --> 26:09.560]  Those are what it's worth.
[26:09.560 --> 26:10.560]  I don't know.
[26:10.560 --> 26:15.560]  So I'm definitely going to have to fight this purr anyway.
[26:15.560 --> 26:17.560]  Okay.
[26:17.560 --> 26:18.560]  Well, congratulations.
[26:18.560 --> 26:19.560]  Glad it worked.
[26:19.560 --> 26:20.560]  Thanks.
[26:20.560 --> 26:21.560]  Okay.
[26:21.560 --> 26:26.560]  So what I'm going to do right now is, okay, this is the next question I have for you.
[26:26.560 --> 26:32.560]  Now, since this has occurred, this has been dismissed and it retroactively negates the other,
[26:32.560 --> 26:37.560]  the draft charges now, what do I do now?
[26:37.560 --> 26:41.560]  Not retroactively, subsequently.
[26:41.560 --> 26:43.560]  Okay.
[26:43.560 --> 26:48.560]  They are completely dependent upon probable cause in the first instance,
[26:48.560 --> 26:52.560]  which does not and did not exist.
[26:52.560 --> 26:54.560]  Okay.
[26:54.560 --> 26:55.560]  Okay.
[26:55.560 --> 26:58.560]  What's the steps I should take now?
[26:58.560 --> 27:05.560]  I just told you, you file a motion to dismiss stating all of the things that you've already stated,
[27:05.560 --> 27:11.560]  but you insert at the end of that, as a result of these facts,
[27:11.560 --> 27:18.560]  the charges alleged are subsequently fruit of the poison tree
[27:18.560 --> 27:24.560]  and must be dismissed in the interest of justice as a violation of the right of due process
[27:24.560 --> 27:27.560]  and the violation of seizure without probable cause.
[27:27.560 --> 27:33.560]  It's a violation or Fourth Amendment or Fifth Amendment search and seizure without probable cause.
[27:33.560 --> 27:34.560]  Okay.
[27:34.560 --> 27:35.560]  Okay.
[27:35.560 --> 27:39.560]  So I have that piece of paper that granted the dismissal.
[27:39.560 --> 27:43.560]  So do I take that to that court and then demand that?
[27:43.560 --> 27:48.560]  If you fix it the way I've told you, citing Fourth and Fifth Amendment violations
[27:48.560 --> 27:54.560]  and result as a result of fruit of the poison tree, okay, then yeah,
[27:54.560 --> 27:58.560]  you file it in whatever court just like you did this stuff.
[27:58.560 --> 27:59.560]  Yeah, that was a traffic court.
[27:59.560 --> 28:02.560]  This one I went to today was a circuit court.
[28:02.560 --> 28:07.560]  And even the circuit court had to agree this ain't going to work.
[28:07.560 --> 28:10.560]  Okay.
[28:10.560 --> 28:16.560]  All right, then I'll go down tomorrow taking that and I'll take all those.
[28:16.560 --> 28:21.560]  You suggest I should take the same papers that I had that information that I already filed with them.
[28:21.560 --> 28:22.560]  Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[28:22.560 --> 28:26.560]  You are listening to what you're hearing come out of my mouth, right?
[28:26.560 --> 28:27.560]  Right.
[28:27.560 --> 28:29.560]  One last time.
[28:29.560 --> 28:37.560]  Take the same stuff that you just filed and edit it to include the other stuff I've just told you
[28:37.560 --> 28:42.560]  about Fourth and Fifth Amendment search and seizure violations
[28:42.560 --> 28:47.560]  and the resulting charges being fruit of the poison tree
[28:47.560 --> 28:52.560]  because there was no initial probable cause.
[28:52.560 --> 28:53.560]  Okay.
[28:53.560 --> 29:00.560]  Therefore, the charges in the interest of justice must be dismissed.
[29:00.560 --> 29:02.560]  All right, got it.
[29:02.560 --> 29:03.560]  I will do that.
[29:03.560 --> 29:12.560]  And then after that is done, I can then litigate to file a lawsuit for my damages.
[29:12.560 --> 29:18.560]  You could most likely sue the officer for false imprisonment right now.
[29:18.560 --> 29:25.560]  The issue of his falsely imprisoning you is completely separate from anything to do with your citations.
[29:25.560 --> 29:29.560]  Here in Texas, they take you directly to jail instead of before a magistrate.
[29:29.560 --> 29:33.560]  You can sue the crap out of the cop immediately.
[29:33.560 --> 29:36.560]  All right, got it.
[29:36.560 --> 29:40.560]  But if you want to sue him for malicious prosecution and everything else,
[29:40.560 --> 29:49.560]  then you have to wait for each charge to get resolved in your favor in order to have a cause of action for that purpose.
[29:49.560 --> 29:51.560]  All right, man, I got to take a break.
[29:51.560 --> 29:52.560]  Thanks for letting us know.
[29:52.560 --> 29:54.560]  If you got anything else, give us another call later.
[29:54.560 --> 29:56.560]  All right, folks, we'll be right back.
[29:56.560 --> 30:01.560]  So y'all hang in there.
[30:01.560 --> 30:05.560]  Here in the U.S., you can name your child pretty much anything you want,
[30:05.560 --> 30:09.560]  but creative naming and weird spelling won't fly in other parts of the world.
[30:09.560 --> 30:15.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with some surprising lies about baby names.
[30:39.560 --> 30:41.560]  To Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.560 --> 30:44.560]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:44.560 --> 30:46.560]  Is it a girl or a boy?
[30:46.560 --> 30:50.560]  In Denmark and Germany, you should be able to tell by the baby's name.
[30:50.560 --> 30:51.560]  It's the law.
[30:51.560 --> 30:56.560]  For example, the name Matty is verboten in Germany because it could cause gender confusion.
[30:56.560 --> 31:00.560]  Several countries won't allow names considered harmful to a child's self-image.
[31:00.560 --> 31:05.560]  The names Adolf Hitler and Satan are banned in New Zealand, which might be understandable.
[31:05.560 --> 31:10.560]  But fans of the king of rock and roll might wonder why the name Elvis has been rejected in Sweden.
[31:10.560 --> 31:16.560]  What's not surprising is that Chinese baby naming laws reflect the country's control agenda.
[31:16.560 --> 31:23.560]  Parents must give newborns names that can be easily scanned by a computer for the country's national ID card program.
[31:23.560 --> 31:36.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:54.560 --> 32:00.560]  Call 888-910-4367 only at lusa.org.
[32:00.560 --> 32:04.560]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:04.560 --> 32:07.560]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:07.560 --> 32:12.560]  And if we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.560 --> 32:16.560]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:16.560 --> 32:19.560]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.560 --> 32:25.560]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.560 --> 32:28.560]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:28.560 --> 32:35.560]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.560 --> 32:40.560]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.560 --> 32:45.560]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, A Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.560 --> 32:50.560]  and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.560 --> 32:54.560]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.560 --> 33:01.560]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:01.560 --> 33:14.560]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:14.560 --> 33:17.560]  Yeah, I got a warrant.
[33:17.560 --> 33:20.560]  I'm going to solve them.
[33:20.560 --> 33:23.560]  To the head government them.
[33:23.560 --> 33:25.560]  Prosecute them.
[33:25.560 --> 33:28.560]  Okay.
[33:28.560 --> 33:31.560]  Who's that?
[33:31.560 --> 33:36.560]  The person's arrest from Mr. Bush.
[33:36.560 --> 33:41.560]  The person's arrest for detaining.
[33:41.560 --> 33:44.560]  I need a prosecutor to come and help me.
[33:44.560 --> 33:46.560]  Prosecute them, wicked leader.
[33:46.560 --> 33:48.560]  You see, the murderers are liars.
[33:48.560 --> 33:50.560]  Them tell me, them are liars.
[33:50.560 --> 33:51.560]  They tell sweet stories.
[33:51.560 --> 33:53.560]  We don't believe me, say what them tell me.
[33:53.560 --> 33:56.560]  3% of Americans vote for Bush.
[33:56.560 --> 33:58.560]  So how the hell he get the presidency?
[33:58.560 --> 34:01.560]  That's why we have a warrant for him.
[34:01.560 --> 34:03.560]  Everybody listen carefully.
[34:03.560 --> 34:05.560]  Listen to the words of the three shoes passes.
[34:05.560 --> 34:10.560]  The person's arrest from Mr. Bush.
[34:10.560 --> 34:13.560]  The person's arrest for detaining.
[34:13.560 --> 34:15.560]  All right, folks, we are back.
[34:15.560 --> 34:17.560]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig.
[34:17.560 --> 34:20.560]  We are now talking to Eric in California.
[34:20.560 --> 34:23.560]  Eric, what do you got for us?
[34:23.560 --> 34:24.560]  Yeah, hi.
[34:24.560 --> 34:27.560]  My wife got a speeding ticket a while back.
[34:27.560 --> 34:29.560]  It was unsafe speed.
[34:29.560 --> 34:31.560]  Speeding ticket where?
[34:31.560 --> 34:34.560]  It was on city streets, not on the highway.
[34:34.560 --> 34:35.560]  State.
[34:35.560 --> 34:38.560]  And the state is California.
[34:38.560 --> 34:40.560]  Okay.
[34:40.560 --> 34:43.560]  And what level of offense is unsafe speed?
[34:43.560 --> 34:48.560]  And what is the statutory demarcation for unsafe?
[34:48.560 --> 34:50.560]  It says infraction.
[34:50.560 --> 34:53.560]  It is what kind of infraction?
[34:53.560 --> 34:59.560]  Well, it doesn't look like a misdemeanor or infraction.
[34:59.560 --> 35:04.560]  Okay, if only infraction is checked and not misdemeanor, then it's civil.
[35:04.560 --> 35:10.560]  California law is very, very clear that infractions are not criminal.
[35:10.560 --> 35:12.560]  Right, okay.
[35:12.560 --> 35:20.560]  Okay, so the situation you have is exactly the same one that Truth Raider just got through talking about on his case.
[35:20.560 --> 35:25.560]  You live in a state where a civil infraction is not a crime.
[35:25.560 --> 35:29.560]  Infractions in most states are not defined as crimes.
[35:29.560 --> 35:39.560]  Which means in order to seize you or your wife or your car for the purpose of issuing a citation,
[35:39.560 --> 35:49.560]  the officer is violating your rights because he has no warrant and there is no crime, which means he could never get a warrant.
[35:49.560 --> 35:52.560]  So the seizure is illegal.
[35:52.560 --> 35:58.560]  It is false imprisonment on behalf of the lawyer, or I'm sorry, the cop.
[35:58.560 --> 35:59.560]  Right.
[35:59.560 --> 36:06.560]  Okay, so you file a motion to dismiss citing exactly that criteria.
[36:06.560 --> 36:10.560]  And if you will send me an email to Eddie at Rule of Law Radio,
[36:10.560 --> 36:17.560]  I will send you the exact same information I sent to Truth Raider on that subject.
[36:17.560 --> 36:19.560]  Okay.
[36:19.560 --> 36:22.560]  Now, do we file this before the arraignment?
[36:22.560 --> 36:26.560]  You will file a written motion containing this information before anything.
[36:26.560 --> 36:29.560]  You will do it as soon as you can get it written up.
[36:29.560 --> 36:33.560]  And make sure that you file either a certified mail return receipt requested
[36:33.560 --> 36:41.560]  or that you hand deliver it and make someone stamp the copies that you keep proving that it was delivered.
[36:41.560 --> 36:45.560]  Okay.
[36:45.560 --> 36:49.560]  Now, the cop also added on another violation, which is...
[36:49.560 --> 36:55.560]  The cop can't add on violations if his initial arrest was illegal.
[36:55.560 --> 36:56.560]  It won't matter.
[36:56.560 --> 37:02.560]  Everything is fruit of the poison tree from that point forward.
[37:02.560 --> 37:11.560]  If his initial probable cause did not relate to a criminal act, there was no probable cause,
[37:11.560 --> 37:18.560]  making the entire stop or basis for the stop illegal.
[37:18.560 --> 37:20.560]  Okay.
[37:20.560 --> 37:26.560]  And thus, anything that resulted from that stop becomes fruit of the poison tree,
[37:26.560 --> 37:33.560]  is inadmissible, and they have to dismiss for lack of evidence.
[37:33.560 --> 37:36.560]  Okay.
[37:36.560 --> 37:43.560]  I guess the other questions I had related to arraignment and trial and stuff like that,
[37:43.560 --> 37:44.560]  but that's irrelevant.
[37:44.560 --> 37:49.560]  In an infraction, you will never have an arraignment or trial because they're civil.
[37:49.560 --> 37:54.560]  You will go before a commissioner who is not a real judge.
[37:54.560 --> 37:59.560]  He's an administrative peon with a peanut-sized brain.
[37:59.560 --> 38:00.560]  Okay.
[38:00.560 --> 38:08.560]  His only job is to take your money, not to dispense justice, not to understand or even apply the law.
[38:08.560 --> 38:12.560]  He is there to steal in an official capacity.
[38:12.560 --> 38:14.560]  Are we clear?
[38:14.560 --> 38:15.560]  Yeah.
[38:15.560 --> 38:23.560]  What would you do to someone crawling through your window at 2 a.m. to steal from you?
[38:23.560 --> 38:24.560]  I'm going to get out.
[38:24.560 --> 38:26.560]  You would tell them to get out?
[38:26.560 --> 38:28.560]  You're a lot more lenient than I would be, bud.
[38:28.560 --> 38:33.560]  I'll tell you that.
[38:33.560 --> 38:36.560]  Whatever you would do besides outright kill that individual,
[38:36.560 --> 38:41.560]  you want to go in and figuratively do to this moron calling himself a traffic commissioner.
[38:41.560 --> 38:47.560]  You want to beat him black and blue until he can't even state his own name.
[38:47.560 --> 38:49.560]  Right.
[38:49.560 --> 38:53.560]  And remember, they have no immunity from lawsuit.
[38:53.560 --> 38:56.560]  If they attempt to take your money without any sort of due process,
[38:56.560 --> 39:02.560]  you can sue the crap out of them and nobody can get behind them and protect them.
[39:02.560 --> 39:10.560]  Okay.
[39:10.560 --> 39:14.560]  Now, they haven't sent her any complaint yet.
[39:14.560 --> 39:17.560]  Do we need to wait for that at all?
[39:17.560 --> 39:18.560]  No.
[39:18.560 --> 39:19.560]  You get the email to me.
[39:19.560 --> 39:22.560]  I will send the information to you and you file it.
[39:22.560 --> 39:25.560]  You don't wait for anything.
[39:25.560 --> 39:26.560]  Right.
[39:26.560 --> 39:31.560]  So just all the information on the ticket will be enough to include in our filing.
[39:31.560 --> 39:34.560]  Don't worry about what's on the ticket.
[39:34.560 --> 39:37.560]  The only thing you're going to cite the ticket for is say,
[39:37.560 --> 39:41.560]  these allegations were made on this citation which was issued under a Fourth
[39:41.560 --> 39:45.560]  and Fifth Amendment violation of search and seizure.
[39:45.560 --> 39:51.560]  You seized us or you seized the individual named in the citation illegally,
[39:51.560 --> 39:59.560]  without warrant, without any probable cause because there was no crime,
[39:59.560 --> 40:06.560]  making the entire stop illegal and a case of false imprisonment by the officer.
[40:06.560 --> 40:11.560]  I hereby demand dismissal of all charges relevant to the fruit of the poison tree
[40:11.560 --> 40:17.560]  doctrine and an illegal violation of Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights and principles.
[40:17.560 --> 40:19.560]  And that's all there is to it.
[40:19.560 --> 40:22.560]  You don't care what's in the citation.
[40:22.560 --> 40:24.560]  Right.
[40:24.560 --> 40:25.560]  Okay.
[40:25.560 --> 40:26.560]  Sounds good.
[40:26.560 --> 40:28.560]  I'll send you that email.
[40:28.560 --> 40:30.560]  Okay.
[40:30.560 --> 40:31.560]  Okay.
[40:31.560 --> 40:32.560]  Thanks a lot.
[40:32.560 --> 40:33.560]  All right.
[40:33.560 --> 40:36.560]  Now we've got Jeff in Mississippi.
[40:36.560 --> 40:38.560]  Jeff, what do you got?
[40:38.560 --> 40:40.560]  Hi, Eddie, and thanks.
[40:40.560 --> 40:44.560]  I'm still doing my Title 42, 1983.
[40:44.560 --> 40:51.560]  And the party, the opposing party has responded with a 12B6,
[40:51.560 --> 40:57.560]  and I responded with what we talked about last week, an answer and an amended complaint.
[40:57.560 --> 41:05.560]  And now I have a sheet from the clerk called an initial scheduling order.
[41:05.560 --> 41:11.560]  And this is on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26F,
[41:11.560 --> 41:14.560]  a conference between parties' deadline.
[41:14.560 --> 41:18.560]  Now there's nothing in here that says that they want a certain thing,
[41:18.560 --> 41:23.560]  and there's nothing in here that says that anybody wants me to show up and do anything.
[41:23.560 --> 41:30.560]  It just says if you're going to do it, you need to have it done by March 23rd.
[41:30.560 --> 41:37.560]  Well, then call the court clerk and ask for an explanation of that document
[41:37.560 --> 41:39.560]  if you don't understand what it's for.
[41:39.560 --> 41:43.560]  Most likely what they're doing is they're either going to have you meet
[41:43.560 --> 41:49.560]  with the opposing counsel in court, informally more or less,
[41:49.560 --> 41:55.560]  or they're going to have some sort of teleconference between the two of you and the judge.
[41:55.560 --> 42:01.560]  But you need to get the clerk to clarify what the purpose of that document is.
[42:01.560 --> 42:07.560]  Now does the rule itself tell you what you're required to do in those cases?
[42:07.560 --> 42:11.560]  Well, it just talks about parties who are responsible for any type of discovery,
[42:11.560 --> 42:18.560]  and I'm thinking that this, well, it says it is a pre-request for discovery.
[42:18.560 --> 42:24.560]  Okay, then what may, and that's why you need to get clarification and ask about this,
[42:24.560 --> 42:29.560]  what that may indicate is that the judge ruled against their 12b6
[42:29.560 --> 42:36.560]  because your claims have some justiciable lawful fact that should be heard by a jury.
[42:36.560 --> 42:43.560]  See, the only way they can get a 12b6 dismissal is if there are no justiciable facts in the complaint.
[42:43.560 --> 42:49.560]  It must be devoid of any valid claim of fact in law.
[42:49.560 --> 42:53.560]  If they get a 12b6 and there is any of that in there,
[42:53.560 --> 42:58.560]  then the judge is in violation of due process for the plaintiff,
[42:58.560 --> 43:05.560]  and he can be recused from the case for not properly applying the law to the facts.
[43:05.560 --> 43:12.560]  So what you may have there is something that shows that the judge denied their 12b6,
[43:12.560 --> 43:17.560]  but again, if you haven't received anything about that directly from the court
[43:17.560 --> 43:21.560]  or been called into a motions hearing that made that clear,
[43:21.560 --> 43:26.560]  you may want to see if the clerk has any knowledge that you haven't been made aware of yet and ask.
[43:26.560 --> 43:32.560]  Well, you're right, because March 23rd is not the date that I'm supposed to appear.
[43:32.560 --> 43:37.560]  It just says on or before, you're responsible for holding any kind of conference that, you know...
[43:37.560 --> 43:43.560]  Right. So get the clerk to clarify what the purpose of sending you that was.
[43:43.560 --> 43:46.560]  Okay. I've got two more questions.
[43:46.560 --> 43:49.560]  Okay. Well, if you'll hang on, we'll get you on the other side of the break here.
[43:49.560 --> 43:55.560]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, the call-in number 512-646-1984.
[43:55.560 --> 44:08.560]  We'll be right back.
[44:25.560 --> 44:27.560]  And now you can too.
[44:27.560 --> 44:33.560]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:33.560 --> 44:38.560]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.560 --> 44:42.560]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.560 --> 44:49.560]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.560 --> 44:56.560]  lawsuit tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[44:56.560 --> 45:03.560]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.560 --> 45:07.560]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com,
[45:07.560 --> 45:12.560]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 9204 Guadalupe Street, Suite D,
[45:12.560 --> 45:15.560]  here in Austin, Texas, buying Brave New Books and J-Fam
[45:15.560 --> 45:19.560]  and see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.560 --> 45:23.560]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.560 --> 45:27.560]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Alchali and Emi oil,
[45:27.560 --> 45:31.560]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.560 --> 45:38.560]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.560 --> 45:44.560]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.560 --> 45:48.560]  Please don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.560 --> 46:15.560]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:19.560 --> 46:22.560]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:22.560 --> 46:26.560]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are currently talking to Jeff in Mississippi.
[46:26.560 --> 46:30.560]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[46:30.560 --> 46:33.560]  All right, Jeff, what are your other two questions?
[46:33.560 --> 46:39.560]  The opposing attorney has written me a letter, or he has written his brief,
[46:39.560 --> 46:44.560]  and 12b6 included exhibits, my exhibits.
[46:44.560 --> 46:50.560]  So basically, he's already given me his discovery and my discovery,
[46:50.560 --> 46:54.560]  but there's one letter that's been left out, and I'm going to go down to the courthouse tomorrow
[46:54.560 --> 46:56.560]  and enter that in.
[46:56.560 --> 47:02.560]  Do I just hand that to her and have her paste an exhibit tape on there,
[47:02.560 --> 47:05.560]  or do I need to wait for a hearing, and should he have waited for a hearing
[47:05.560 --> 47:09.560]  to put the little exhibit stamps on his?
[47:09.560 --> 47:15.560]  No, the clerk is the one that enters them into the record as exhibits,
[47:15.560 --> 47:17.560]  but I don't know.
[47:17.560 --> 47:22.560]  The intention is whether or not they will be admitted as evidence at trial,
[47:22.560 --> 47:26.560]  which there should have already been an admissions hearing for that purpose.
[47:26.560 --> 47:27.560]  Okay.
[47:27.560 --> 47:31.560]  All right, or at least the presumption is everything that's put in there will be valid.
[47:31.560 --> 47:34.560]  If they want to challenge it at trial, then they can do so,
[47:34.560 --> 47:36.560]  and the judge can rule on it then.
[47:36.560 --> 47:39.560]  It depends upon what the rules you're playing by say.
[47:39.560 --> 47:44.560]  So you need to really, really, really understand the rules of evidence.
[47:44.560 --> 47:47.560]  Make darn sure you understand the rules of evidence.
[47:47.560 --> 47:50.560]  There's two things, if you're going to fight in the courtroom,
[47:50.560 --> 47:54.560]  you better know almost as well as your own name,
[47:54.560 --> 47:57.560]  the rules of procedure and the rules of evidence.
[47:57.560 --> 47:59.560]  You don't know those things.
[47:59.560 --> 48:04.560]  You will get steamrolled or sideswacked and never even see it coming.
[48:04.560 --> 48:06.560]  Okay?
[48:06.560 --> 48:11.560]  So if you have already made sure that this is very valid for you to use,
[48:11.560 --> 48:15.560]  you can, again, when you talk to the clerk about clarifying this document,
[48:15.560 --> 48:17.560]  ask her that question.
[48:17.560 --> 48:23.560]  You can say, can I bring stuff to you now to be labeled as evidence exhibits
[48:23.560 --> 48:26.560]  that I'm going to be using, or do you need me to wait for a particular date
[48:26.560 --> 48:27.560]  or proceeding?
[48:27.560 --> 48:32.560]  How does that need to work in relation to what I do with you in my admitting evidence?
[48:32.560 --> 48:34.560]  Okay.
[48:34.560 --> 48:39.560]  And the last question is, and it was one that you just mentioned to one of the
[48:39.560 --> 48:44.560]  other callers about when the police officer illegally arrests you,
[48:44.560 --> 48:47.560]  you can sue them for that, but if you still have any other charges pending,
[48:47.560 --> 48:48.560]  you have to wait.
[48:48.560 --> 48:50.560]  No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
[48:50.560 --> 48:55.560]  Again, the false imprisonment charge is something completely separate from
[48:55.560 --> 48:58.560]  anything they've charged against you.
[48:58.560 --> 49:00.560]  Understand that.
[49:00.560 --> 49:07.560]  If you want to sue them for malicious prosecution, that you have to wait for.
[49:07.560 --> 49:10.560]  Okay, and that would be a separate Title 42.
[49:10.560 --> 49:12.560]  Yeah.
[49:12.560 --> 49:17.560]  I mean, if you don't run out of statute of limitations for them,
[49:17.560 --> 49:19.560]  then you can do them together.
[49:19.560 --> 49:24.560]  But generally, you're going to run out of time for the false imprisonment suit
[49:24.560 --> 49:30.560]  before you settle the other, depending upon how quickly things go through.
[49:30.560 --> 49:31.560]  Okay.
[49:31.560 --> 49:32.560]  You know what I'm saying?
[49:32.560 --> 49:38.560]  But in order to sue for malicious prosecution, you have to have been the winner.
[49:38.560 --> 49:41.560]  Everything has to have been settled in your favor,
[49:41.560 --> 49:44.560]  or you don't have a malicious prosecution claim.
[49:44.560 --> 49:47.560]  That's the reason you have to wait.
[49:47.560 --> 49:54.560]  So on September the 10th, 2010, I was arrested for a gun charge, and I was brought to jail,
[49:54.560 --> 49:56.560]  and I stayed there for six hours.
[49:56.560 --> 50:01.560]  Then later, actually a couple of years later, I was then convicted of the gun charge,
[50:01.560 --> 50:03.560]  and I spent a year in the penitentiary.
[50:03.560 --> 50:07.560]  You're saying that those are going to be two separate Title 42s.
[50:07.560 --> 50:09.560]  Can I put the damage of...
[50:09.560 --> 50:13.560]  Did you get your conviction overturned?
[50:13.560 --> 50:15.560]  Okay.
[50:15.560 --> 50:16.560]  Okay?
[50:16.560 --> 50:21.560]  If you did not get your conviction overturned,
[50:21.560 --> 50:24.560]  then you do not have a malicious prosecution lawsuit.
[50:24.560 --> 50:30.560]  You have only a false imprisonment lawsuit, which you may be out of time on.
[50:30.560 --> 50:32.560]  Okay?
[50:32.560 --> 50:35.560]  That's the issue here.
[50:35.560 --> 50:40.560]  Can I put the year in the penitentiary as damages for the false arrest?
[50:40.560 --> 50:41.560]  No.
[50:41.560 --> 50:42.560]  That's what I wanted to know too.
[50:42.560 --> 50:48.560]  No, the damages are going to be the result of a separate type of imprisonment,
[50:48.560 --> 50:54.560]  but that imprisonment was resulting from a conviction, not what the officer did.
[50:54.560 --> 50:56.560]  Got it.
[50:56.560 --> 51:03.560]  So those damages would be for a false conviction that would have been a malicious prosecution,
[51:03.560 --> 51:10.560]  which could be part of your damages for the malicious prosecution and the false incarceration.
[51:10.560 --> 51:11.560]  Okay.
[51:11.560 --> 51:15.560]  It will not be part of the original false imprisonment by the officer
[51:15.560 --> 51:19.560]  of arresting you without a warrant and taking you to jail
[51:19.560 --> 51:24.560]  rather than for an independent magistrate for improbable cause determination.
[51:24.560 --> 51:26.560]  Okay.
[51:26.560 --> 51:27.560]  Okay.
[51:27.560 --> 51:28.560]  And last question.
[51:28.560 --> 51:32.560]  When I was in court, when I was at trial, my last trial,
[51:32.560 --> 51:35.560]  I did like the other caller did, however I did not follow through.
[51:35.560 --> 51:40.560]  I got up and I said, objection, this violates my constitutional rights.
[51:40.560 --> 51:43.560]  The judge overruled me, and then I just stayed quiet.
[51:43.560 --> 51:46.560]  I didn't pitch a fit in the band that he recused himself.
[51:46.560 --> 51:49.560]  Can I still use that on my appeal because I did object?
[51:49.560 --> 51:53.560]  Anything you objected to for the record, you can raise as appealable error
[51:53.560 --> 51:56.560]  if you can show how it was appealable error.
[51:56.560 --> 52:00.560]  It's when you don't object that you're screwed.
[52:00.560 --> 52:03.560]  Got it.
[52:03.560 --> 52:04.560]  Okay.
[52:04.560 --> 52:05.560]  Well, thank you very much.
[52:05.560 --> 52:06.560]  I'll call you next week and I'll move on.
[52:06.560 --> 52:07.560]  All right.
[52:07.560 --> 52:08.560]  Thanks for calling in.
[52:08.560 --> 52:09.560]  Thanks.
[52:09.560 --> 52:10.560]  You're welcome.
[52:10.560 --> 52:11.560]  All right.
[52:11.560 --> 52:14.560]  Now we're going to go to Donald.
[52:14.560 --> 52:15.560]  I don't know where Donald is.
[52:15.560 --> 52:18.560]  Donald, where are you?
[52:18.560 --> 52:19.560]  Fort Worth.
[52:19.560 --> 52:20.560]  Fort Worth.
[52:20.560 --> 52:21.560]  All right.
[52:21.560 --> 52:22.560]  So what can we do for you?
[52:22.560 --> 52:23.560]  Thank you.
[52:23.560 --> 52:31.560]  I've got a hearing on a citation, video citation, signal light.
[52:31.560 --> 52:32.560]  Red light.
[52:32.560 --> 52:33.560]  In this letter.
[52:33.560 --> 52:36.560]  Are you talking about a red light camera citation?
[52:36.560 --> 52:37.560]  Yes, sir.
[52:37.560 --> 52:40.560]  Okay.
[52:40.560 --> 52:45.560]  And my concern is how can I beat it?
[52:45.560 --> 52:46.560]  Well, you don't have to beat it.
[52:46.560 --> 52:49.560]  The citation is illegal on its face.
[52:49.560 --> 52:55.560]  The citation is not what any municipality is authorized to issue.
[52:55.560 --> 52:58.560]  The statute is very, very clear.
[52:58.560 --> 53:04.560]  This is a civil offense, not a criminal offense.
[53:04.560 --> 53:13.560]  In order to do anything to collect that $75, they must file a civil lawsuit and sue you
[53:13.560 --> 53:14.560]  for it.
[53:14.560 --> 53:16.560]  That's all they can do.
[53:16.560 --> 53:22.560]  The citation is not authorized in statute anywhere.
[53:22.560 --> 53:24.560]  Never has been.
[53:24.560 --> 53:37.560]  What you need to do is go to my blog site, which is dowoflaw.wordpress.com.
[53:37.560 --> 53:43.560]  Look through the articles posted there and find the one on the red light camera citation lawsuit.
[53:43.560 --> 53:48.560]  At the bottom of that article, you will find links to several documents, including the
[53:48.560 --> 53:55.560]  lawsuit itself that was filed against the red light camera companies here in Texas.
[53:55.560 --> 54:01.560]  You will also find two different versions of a red light camera letter, and you want the
[54:01.560 --> 54:08.560]  latest one of those, which tells them specifically everything that I just told you, but in a
[54:08.560 --> 54:14.560]  much more legal fashion and a go screw yourself happily fashion.
[54:14.560 --> 54:15.560]  Great.
[54:15.560 --> 54:16.560]  Okay.
[54:16.560 --> 54:17.560]  Great.
[54:17.560 --> 54:23.560]  And remember, if they attempt to collect from you using the mail and this citation, that's
[54:23.560 --> 54:24.560]  a federal offense.
[54:24.560 --> 54:26.560]  It is mail fraud.
[54:26.560 --> 54:32.560]  You can sue.
[54:32.560 --> 54:33.560]  All right.
[54:33.560 --> 54:34.560]  Fantastic.
[54:34.560 --> 54:40.560]  So what you need to do is call the postmaster general and file an official complaint against
[54:40.560 --> 54:48.560]  the police department of that town of using fraudulent instruments in the mail and mail
[54:48.560 --> 54:52.560]  fraud.
[54:52.560 --> 54:57.560]  File an official complaint with the United States postmaster general.
[54:57.560 --> 55:02.560]  These Texas police departments and municipalities are committing fraud through the United States
[55:02.560 --> 55:06.560]  mail.
[55:06.560 --> 55:08.560]  Okay.
[55:08.560 --> 55:10.560]  And do yourself a favor.
[55:10.560 --> 55:16.560]  When you send in the copy of the red light camera letter, send in a copy of that complaint
[55:16.560 --> 55:21.560]  with the postmaster general along with it.
[55:21.560 --> 55:22.560]  Okay.
[55:22.560 --> 55:28.560]  You won't be able to see how fast they run away with binoculars.
[55:28.560 --> 55:34.560]  And if they don't, then you will not be able to measure the amount of stupid they're using
[55:34.560 --> 55:38.560]  in a tanker, you know?
[55:38.560 --> 55:41.560]  Interesting.
[55:41.560 --> 55:48.560]  So they won't have any cause to say, you know, I have to pay the fee to get my license renewed?
[55:48.560 --> 55:49.560]  No.
[55:49.560 --> 55:50.560]  The statute is very clear.
[55:50.560 --> 55:58.560]  They cannot use that red light camera picture in any way detrimental to the person they
[55:58.560 --> 55:59.560]  allege committed the offense.
[55:59.560 --> 56:02.560]  The statute is absolutely clear.
[56:02.560 --> 56:05.560]  They cannot do anything but sue you.
[56:05.560 --> 56:09.560]  And if they get a judgment, then they can send it to a collection agency.
[56:09.560 --> 56:18.560]  If they do anything else besides that and in that order, they're in violation of law.
[56:18.560 --> 56:21.560]  And that's on your blog where I can print it out.
[56:21.560 --> 56:23.560]  You can look at everything.
[56:23.560 --> 56:24.560]  Read that lawsuit.
[56:24.560 --> 56:31.560]  Everything I'm telling you is spelled out and tells you exactly what statute to go look it up in.
[56:31.560 --> 56:38.560]  And that lawsuit was filed by an attorney's office there in Plano.
[56:38.560 --> 56:39.560]  Okay.
[56:39.560 --> 56:42.560]  Okay.
[56:42.560 --> 56:44.560]  Good.
[56:44.560 --> 56:49.560]  And that's what I'll use this Friday when I show up because they got me showing up for an
[56:49.560 --> 56:50.560]  administrative hearing.
[56:50.560 --> 56:51.560]  No.
[56:51.560 --> 56:54.560]  You're going to go talk to some cop that's going to rule against you regardless.
[56:54.560 --> 57:00.560]  What you need to do is hand that cop that letter along with your complaint to the postmaster general.
[57:00.560 --> 57:06.560]  And then when you give it to them, say, you need to read these because when you fail to do so, you,
[57:06.560 --> 57:11.560]  me, and the city are going to be in federal court for a while.
[57:11.560 --> 57:15.560]  So can I accept his oath and his oath of office?
[57:15.560 --> 57:16.560]  Wait a minute.
[57:16.560 --> 57:17.560]  Wait a minute.
[57:17.560 --> 57:22.560]  Did you hear any of that come out of my mouth?
[57:22.560 --> 57:23.560]  No.
[57:23.560 --> 57:27.560]  Then why are we talking about it?
[57:27.560 --> 57:34.560]  If this is an administrative proceeding, which it is, none of that matters.
[57:34.560 --> 57:35.560]  Okay.
[57:35.560 --> 57:41.560]  They could get some third grader from the local elementary school to do what this cop's going to do.
[57:41.560 --> 57:47.560]  And it wouldn't matter.
[57:47.560 --> 57:48.560]  No problem, sir.
[57:48.560 --> 57:54.560]  I'll be on your blog and I'll look at the lawsuit and get the latest letter and present it Friday when I see them.
[57:54.560 --> 57:55.560]  All right.
[57:55.560 --> 57:57.560]  Good luck, Donald.
[57:57.560 --> 57:58.560]  Thank you.
[57:58.560 --> 57:59.560]  You're very welcome.
[57:59.560 --> 58:00.560]  Have a good one.
[58:00.560 --> 58:01.560]  All right, folks.
[58:01.560 --> 58:02.560]  We are at the top of the hour break.
[58:02.560 --> 58:09.560]  We will be back here in about four or five minutes when that break is over and I'll continue with the calls.
[58:09.560 --> 58:14.560]  Mark and Fan, I see you there or Kimberly or whichever one this is.
[58:14.560 --> 58:16.560]  I don't know what order this is in on this thing.
[58:16.560 --> 58:18.560]  So I apologize if I got any of it wrong.
[58:18.560 --> 58:24.560]  But all you callers that are on the board, please stay on the board and we will get with you when we get back.
[58:24.560 --> 58:25.560]  All right, folks.
[58:25.560 --> 58:28.560]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[58:28.560 --> 58:50.560]  We will be right back after this break.
[58:50.560 --> 58:58.560]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.560 --> 59:06.560]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:06.560 --> 59:09.560]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.560 --> 59:18.560]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.560 --> 59:28.560]  The difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.560 --> 59:33.560]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.560 --> 59:47.560]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.560 --> 59:50.560]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.560 --> 01:00:00.560]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.560 --> 01:00:20.560]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily bulletins for the commodities market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:20.560 --> 01:00:42.560]  Markets for Wednesday, March 9, 2016, are currently trending with gold at $1,252.65 an ounce, silver $15.29 an ounce, Texas crude $36.50 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $411 U.S. currency.
[01:00:42.560 --> 01:00:54.560]  Today in history, the year 1961, the first animal safely returned from space after completing one full orbit around the earth in Sputnik 9, a doggy named Chernushka or Blackie returned from the heavens.
[01:00:54.560 --> 01:00:59.560]  Today in history.
[01:00:59.560 --> 01:01:05.560]  In recent news, Tehrad Pugh, a U.S. Air Force veteran, was found guilty today of attempting to join the Islamic State.
[01:01:05.560 --> 01:01:17.560]  After a week-long trial at a Brooklyn federal court, a jury found Tehrad guilty of attempting to provide material support to ISIS and guilty of obstruction for destroying four e-storage drives after his detention in Turkey.
[01:01:17.560 --> 01:01:19.560]  Pugh is said to be sentenced in September.
[01:01:19.560 --> 01:01:31.560]  Pugh's defense lawyer is arguing that all he did was express repugnant views about the Islamic State on Facebook and watch dozens of the group's recruitment videos, and that he was only traveling to Turkey to find work, not to become a jihadist.
[01:01:31.560 --> 01:01:39.560]  However, prosecutors are presenting a letter he apparently drafted to his Egyptian wife, which was found on his laptop, in which he vowed to fight for Islam.
[01:01:39.560 --> 01:01:50.560]  When detained in Istanbul, he apparently had a black face mask, a map depicting Islamic State's stronghold in Syria, and a chart of the border crossings between Turkey and Syria.
[01:01:50.560 --> 01:02:05.560]  Pugh served as an avionics specialist in the Air Force from 1986 to 1990, and later worked as an Army contractor in Iraq from 2009 to 2010.
[01:02:05.560 --> 01:02:26.560]  Toyota recently showed off a new device that could dramatically assist the visually impaired to better navigate their surroundings. Called Project Blade an informational device to bridge the gap between a cane or a guide dog, Toyota has been testing various prototypes of the wearable device with individuals from the visually impaired community for the past three years, and though the details of the project were released this week, no official timeline has been set for the release.
[01:02:26.560 --> 01:02:41.560]  The automaker plans incorporating mapping, object identification, and facial mapping technologies into Blade in the future. Doug Moore, manager of partner robotics at Toyota, told ABC that Toyota is thinking about quality of life for individuals and how to impact society.
[01:02:56.560 --> 01:03:24.560]  2016.
[01:03:24.560 --> 01:03:37.560]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call it number 512-646-1984. Now we are talking to Mark in Florida. Mark, what do you got?
[01:03:37.560 --> 01:03:39.560]  Hey, thanks for having me on the show, Eddie.
[01:03:39.560 --> 01:03:41.560]  Yes, sir.
[01:03:41.560 --> 01:03:45.560]  I've got a question about I'm getting closer to filing these lawsuits.
[01:03:45.560 --> 01:03:48.560]  Okay.
[01:03:48.560 --> 01:03:58.560]  And I wanted to know whether it would be advantageous to do them all separately or lump them together in the one huge lawsuit.
[01:03:58.560 --> 01:04:08.560]  That depends upon whether or not there are common denominators between the events that you are suing over.
[01:04:08.560 --> 01:04:11.560]  Okay. Well, most of them are under the same.
[01:04:11.560 --> 01:04:12.560]  Well, that.
[01:04:12.560 --> 01:04:13.560]  Mr. Mayor.
[01:04:13.560 --> 01:04:20.560]  Most of them is not the issue. Are they stemming from related events?
[01:04:20.560 --> 01:04:29.560]  For instance, do you have 10 charges from this arrest, 10 charges from that arrest, and all those arrests are from the same police department in the same municipality?
[01:04:29.560 --> 01:04:33.560]  That's what I'm getting at.
[01:04:33.560 --> 01:04:37.560]  Almost all of them are from the same city police.
[01:04:37.560 --> 01:04:42.560]  Okay. But are they for the same set of events?
[01:04:42.560 --> 01:04:44.560]  Yes, same charge.
[01:04:44.560 --> 01:04:49.560]  No, no, no, no, no, not same charge, same event.
[01:04:49.560 --> 01:04:54.560]  Stop one or stop five, or are they all from stop one?
[01:04:54.560 --> 01:04:56.560]  They're all from separate stops.
[01:04:56.560 --> 01:05:01.560]  Okay. Are they all over the same thing?
[01:05:01.560 --> 01:05:05.560]  Now we're talking about the charge.
[01:05:05.560 --> 01:05:06.560]  All but one.
[01:05:06.560 --> 01:05:12.560]  All but one. What is different about the one?
[01:05:12.560 --> 01:05:16.560]  Resisting, obstructing an officer without violence.
[01:05:16.560 --> 01:05:22.560]  But those came in addition to one of the ones that is similar to all the other ones, right?
[01:05:22.560 --> 01:05:24.560]  No, that was the only charge.
[01:05:24.560 --> 01:05:26.560]  Oh, it was the only charge.
[01:05:26.560 --> 01:05:28.560]  That was the only charge on that one.
[01:05:28.560 --> 01:05:36.560]  In other words, it's the same bull crap they pull about you're under arrest or resisting arrest?
[01:05:36.560 --> 01:05:38.560]  Exactly.
[01:05:38.560 --> 01:05:39.560]  Okay.
[01:05:39.560 --> 01:05:41.560]  I couldn't agree with you more.
[01:05:41.560 --> 01:05:44.560]  All right. Well, here's the predicament.
[01:05:44.560 --> 01:05:53.560]  If they all stem from the same folks in the same place generally over the same issue,
[01:05:53.560 --> 01:05:59.560]  and they have lost on that issue in your case significantly each time,
[01:05:59.560 --> 01:06:06.560]  and they continue to harass you in the same manner, then yes, you can lump them all together.
[01:06:06.560 --> 01:06:08.560]  Okay?
[01:06:08.560 --> 01:06:16.560]  But if there's anything that makes them distinctive and not related to,
[01:06:16.560 --> 01:06:24.560]  then you might want to consider keeping that one separate and apart.
[01:06:24.560 --> 01:06:29.560]  Well, one of my fears is the old saying, don't put all your eggs in one basket.
[01:06:29.560 --> 01:06:37.560]  Well, that may be true, but the problem is is for everything you file, you better have the money to sustain.
[01:06:37.560 --> 01:06:41.560]  Every suit will require a filing fee.
[01:06:41.560 --> 01:06:47.560]  Every progression of that suit will require service, which means you will have to serve the same people
[01:06:47.560 --> 01:06:50.560]  in every case multiple times.
[01:06:50.560 --> 01:06:56.560]  And what you need to remember is that is where the other side will always try to bankrupt you,
[01:06:56.560 --> 01:07:02.560]  forcing you to spend more money on procedure and process
[01:07:02.560 --> 01:07:09.560]  than you could ever hope to survive on through the lawsuit unless you've got deep pockets.
[01:07:09.560 --> 01:07:12.560]  Well, see, herein lies the problem.
[01:07:12.560 --> 01:07:15.560]  I'm going to have to do this in the form of papyrus.
[01:07:15.560 --> 01:07:17.560]  Well, that's just it.
[01:07:17.560 --> 01:07:21.560]  The federal court is not going to let you maintain multiple suits in form of papyrus
[01:07:21.560 --> 01:07:29.560]  if they ever manage to get you on not having a proper cause of action in any one of them.
[01:07:29.560 --> 01:07:35.560]  They will throw them all out, almost guaranteed they will.
[01:07:35.560 --> 01:07:40.560]  So the first thing you need to make sure you do is that you cite a proper complaint
[01:07:40.560 --> 01:07:46.560]  and cite your claim in that complaint clearly.
[01:07:46.560 --> 01:07:51.560]  And do it in accordance with how they're expecting to see it and the facts related to how you can prove it
[01:07:51.560 --> 01:07:53.560]  and so on and so forth.
[01:07:53.560 --> 01:08:00.560]  Because if they can get a 12b6 dismissal because you didn't properly state a claim upon which relief can be granted
[01:08:00.560 --> 01:08:08.560]  and you file that suit in form of papyrus, even though the federal court is required to tell you how it's wrong,
[01:08:08.560 --> 01:08:14.560]  they can then sanction you for filing a suit that wouldn't sustain itself
[01:08:14.560 --> 01:08:21.560]  and thus deny you any future filings without their approval of an informal papyrus nature.
[01:08:21.560 --> 01:08:26.560]  It's just another way the attorneys control access to the courts and the system in justice.
[01:08:26.560 --> 01:08:30.560]  But it is what they're doing like it or not at the moment.
[01:08:30.560 --> 01:08:38.560]  Until we actually get the idea in our heads that our best way to obtain freedom is to hang the damned attorneys,
[01:08:38.560 --> 01:08:41.560]  this is what we're stuck with.
[01:08:41.560 --> 01:08:46.560]  Right. Right. I do have Dr. Gray's course.
[01:08:46.560 --> 01:08:50.560]  Then you need to study it well in a civil lawsuit.
[01:08:50.560 --> 01:08:54.560]  Now here's the one part where Dr. Gray's course falls way too short in my opinion.
[01:08:54.560 --> 01:09:02.560]  It does not deal with suing governmental entities in any way that will really help you.
[01:09:02.560 --> 01:09:07.560]  Standard lawsuits amongst individuals and corporations, fine.
[01:09:07.560 --> 01:09:13.560]  But when it comes to suing a governmental entity, it's a whole different ballgame.
[01:09:13.560 --> 01:09:26.560]  And that course though will get you through 65, 70% of any lawsuit including those, it's that remaining 35 or 40% or 30%
[01:09:26.560 --> 01:09:31.560]  that's going to hit you like a ton of bricks if you don't know how to figure it out.
[01:09:31.560 --> 01:09:35.560]  Yeah. Okay. Next question.
[01:09:35.560 --> 01:09:41.560]  The last two times my recreational commands was told,
[01:09:41.560 --> 01:09:48.560]  it was told just over 10 miles and Florida does have a statute talking about
[01:09:48.560 --> 01:09:53.560]  towing a private conveyance or vehicle they say,
[01:09:53.560 --> 01:09:59.560]  towing a vehicle from private property without the owner's consent.
[01:09:59.560 --> 01:10:04.560]  It cannot be towed more than 10 miles at the felony.
[01:10:04.560 --> 01:10:08.560]  And it's 10.36 miles according to Google.
[01:10:08.560 --> 01:10:13.560]  That's a radius, straight line as it goes from there.
[01:10:13.560 --> 01:10:20.560]  Then you definitely may have grounds there to get your dismissal for violation of law.
[01:10:20.560 --> 01:10:27.560]  They can't commit a much bigger crime in relation to convicting you of a smaller crime.
[01:10:27.560 --> 01:10:29.560]  You know what I'm saying?
[01:10:29.560 --> 01:10:35.560]  Yes, sir. That's a clean hands doctrine, I believe.
[01:10:35.560 --> 01:10:38.560]  Exactly. Okay.
[01:10:38.560 --> 01:10:41.560]  I'm familiar with that.
[01:10:41.560 --> 01:10:45.560]  Should I go after the tow company for felonies?
[01:10:45.560 --> 01:10:48.560]  Who does it say in statute is guilty of the fraud,
[01:10:48.560 --> 01:10:54.560]  the people that forced the tow or the people that did the tow?
[01:10:54.560 --> 01:10:56.560]  I believe it says people that did the tow.
[01:10:56.560 --> 01:10:58.560]  I'll have to reread it to make sure.
[01:10:58.560 --> 01:11:02.560]  Then you may have grounds to sue them for commission of a felony under Florida statute.
[01:11:02.560 --> 01:11:07.560]  You need to see if there's a cause of action related to that statute and that crime.
[01:11:07.560 --> 01:11:16.560]  And you may also see if you can sue the police department for partnering in that crime.
[01:11:16.560 --> 01:11:23.560]  The police department's last word is they're denying having any action with the last two tows.
[01:11:23.560 --> 01:11:26.560]  They're denying ordering the tow, of course.
[01:11:26.560 --> 01:11:29.560]  Well, the thing about it is there has to be paperwork.
[01:11:29.560 --> 01:11:35.560]  If you file a motion for discovery of the records existing relating to you or your property
[01:11:35.560 --> 01:11:38.560]  between the police department and that tow company,
[01:11:38.560 --> 01:11:42.560]  there's going to be a record whether they want to give it to you or not.
[01:11:42.560 --> 01:11:50.560]  Yes. I've had the manager of the tow company tell me he does have a tow slip
[01:11:50.560 --> 01:11:53.560]  that the police ordered the tow on both pages.
[01:11:53.560 --> 01:11:57.560]  Then you can file for discovery both on the tow company and the police department.
[01:11:57.560 --> 01:12:03.560]  If the police department denies having such record while the tow company produces such record,
[01:12:03.560 --> 01:12:08.560]  you can move for sanction and unclean hands against the cops.
[01:12:08.560 --> 01:12:14.560]  Right. Now, here's a little bit of a kink in the works on that Florida statute.
[01:12:14.560 --> 01:12:19.560]  It is talking about going from private property.
[01:12:19.560 --> 01:12:22.560]  This tow was from a county park.
[01:12:22.560 --> 01:12:31.560]  They cannot find or have not found as of yet any statute referring to a tow on public property.
[01:12:31.560 --> 01:12:39.560]  If anybody out there knows of that statute in Florida, chirp in.
[01:12:39.560 --> 01:12:40.560]  I'd appreciate it.
[01:12:40.560 --> 01:12:42.560]  Yeah. Go for it.
[01:12:42.560 --> 01:12:43.560]  All right.
[01:12:43.560 --> 01:12:51.560]  The next thing you said you're suing, last week's show you said you're suing both in Texas and the Fed.
[01:12:51.560 --> 01:12:53.560]  Did you explain that a little bit?
[01:12:53.560 --> 01:12:59.560]  Well, what most state actors don't realize is that when they screw up and violate rights,
[01:12:59.560 --> 01:13:04.560]  they can be sued under both state protections and then again under federal protections,
[01:13:04.560 --> 01:13:07.560]  and that can be done simultaneously.
[01:13:07.560 --> 01:13:12.560]  There's case law in the books where the sheriff's department, or actually several sheriffs
[01:13:12.560 --> 01:13:17.560]  and their departments got sued both in the state and the Fed
[01:13:17.560 --> 01:13:23.560]  and then tried to get the state case dismissed or the Fed case dismissed, I forget which one,
[01:13:23.560 --> 01:13:30.560]  because they were getting sued in the other and the court said, no, these are two separate spheres of protection.
[01:13:30.560 --> 01:13:38.560]  You can violate something down here and get sued for it in both places if both places offer protection for it.
[01:13:38.560 --> 01:13:42.560]  It's not double jeopardy in that case.
[01:13:42.560 --> 01:13:46.560]  Does that also apply on the criminal side?
[01:13:46.560 --> 01:13:49.560]  There is no such thing as suing on the criminal side.
[01:13:49.560 --> 01:13:55.560]  You can sue civilly for a criminal offense.
[01:13:55.560 --> 01:13:58.560]  No, I'm talking about the...
[01:13:58.560 --> 01:14:05.560]  Yes, you can be tried and convicted both in state and federal for an actual crime,
[01:14:05.560 --> 01:14:10.560]  provided it would be a crime over which both had jurisdiction.
[01:14:10.560 --> 01:14:15.560]  And the thing about that is, is there isn't any such crime.
[01:14:15.560 --> 01:14:23.560]  The states do not have any jurisdiction over the crimes that the Fed is given authority over via the Constitution.
[01:14:23.560 --> 01:14:32.560]  And the Feds have no authority over the crimes committed within the territories of the state via the Constitution.
[01:14:32.560 --> 01:14:37.560]  So criminally, technically, the answer is no, but they do it all the time.
[01:14:37.560 --> 01:14:39.560]  It's illegal, it's unconstitut...
[01:14:39.560 --> 01:14:40.560]  Well, it's not illegal.
[01:14:40.560 --> 01:14:44.560]  It's unconstitutional, but they're doing it.
[01:14:44.560 --> 01:14:58.560]  Because we're letting the attorneys create laws that violate every constitutional protection or power that we gave them or withheld from them.
[01:14:58.560 --> 01:14:59.560]  I lost you, Eddie.
[01:14:59.560 --> 01:15:00.560]  You still there?
[01:15:00.560 --> 01:15:01.560]  I'm still here.
[01:15:01.560 --> 01:15:06.560]  I've been talking up a storm, so if you didn't get it, check the archive.
[01:15:06.560 --> 01:15:08.560]  I lost you.
[01:15:08.560 --> 01:15:15.560]  All right, well, check the archive, because I've been talking the whole time.
[01:15:15.560 --> 01:15:16.560]  Can you hear me, Mark?
[01:15:16.560 --> 01:15:17.560]  Hello.
[01:15:17.560 --> 01:15:21.560]  Can you hear me, Mark?
[01:15:21.560 --> 01:15:25.560]  All right, I'm going to have to drop Mark and make him call back in.
[01:15:25.560 --> 01:15:32.560]  Call screener, if he calls back in, make sure you reconnect him, if you can, real quick and remind me that he's back.
[01:15:32.560 --> 01:15:33.560]  All right.
[01:15:33.560 --> 01:15:37.560]  While we're waiting for him to come back, let's go to Kimberly.
[01:15:37.560 --> 01:15:40.560]  Kimberly, where are you calling from?
[01:15:40.560 --> 01:15:42.560]  I'm calling from California.
[01:15:42.560 --> 01:15:43.560]  Okay.
[01:15:43.560 --> 01:15:47.560]  And what are you calling us about from California?
[01:15:47.560 --> 01:15:50.560]  I'm calling in regards to a traffic ticket I have.
[01:15:50.560 --> 01:15:52.560]  I am planning to get it for tomorrow.
[01:15:52.560 --> 01:15:54.560]  What kind of ticket?
[01:15:54.560 --> 01:15:56.560]  It's a speeding ticket.
[01:15:56.560 --> 01:15:57.560]  Okay.
[01:15:57.560 --> 01:16:02.560]  Were you listening when I talked to the other guy from California here just a little bit ago?
[01:16:02.560 --> 01:16:08.560]  I wasn't, because I'm like actually at work right now, so I wasn't able to listen, but I did a little bit.
[01:16:08.560 --> 01:16:10.560]  Okay.
[01:16:10.560 --> 01:16:14.560]  In California, these are infractions.
[01:16:14.560 --> 01:16:17.560]  They are not crimes.
[01:16:17.560 --> 01:16:27.560]  When an officer pulls you over for an infraction, it is he or she that is committing a crime.
[01:16:27.560 --> 01:16:33.560]  It is an unconstitutional and illegal search and seizure.
[01:16:33.560 --> 01:16:37.560]  If you will hang on just a minute, I will explain that in a little bit more detail,
[01:16:37.560 --> 01:16:42.560]  and then I will give you some information on how I can send you some information to help you.
[01:16:42.560 --> 01:16:45.560]  So hang on just a minute, and I'll be right back with you.
[01:16:45.560 --> 01:16:46.560]  All right, folks.
[01:16:46.560 --> 01:16:51.560]  This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:51.560 --> 01:16:56.560]  We got three more segments to go, so if y'all want to call in and get in line, let's get with it.
[01:16:56.560 --> 01:17:00.560]  I'll be right back.
[01:17:26.560 --> 01:17:29.560]  I'll be right back.
[01:17:56.560 --> 01:17:59.560]  I'll be right back.
[01:18:26.560 --> 01:18:31.560]  The Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.560 --> 01:18:36.560]  We have come to trust Jungevity so much we became a marketing distributor
[01:18:36.560 --> 01:18:40.560]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.560 --> 01:18:47.560]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.560 --> 01:18:52.560]  As you realize the benefits of Jungevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.560 --> 01:18:57.560]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[01:18:57.560 --> 01:18:59.560]  and increase your income.
[01:18:59.560 --> 01:19:01.560]  Order now.
[01:19:01.560 --> 01:19:26.560]  This is the Logos Lafogos Radio Network.
[01:19:31.560 --> 01:19:40.560]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:40.560 --> 01:19:45.560]  This is Rule of Law Radio again, calling number 512-646-1984,
[01:19:45.560 --> 01:19:48.560]  and we are talking to Kimberly in California.
[01:19:48.560 --> 01:19:54.560]  All right, Kimberly, anyway, what I was getting at is infractions in California are not crimes.
[01:19:54.560 --> 01:19:58.560]  They are civil, which means in order to stop you,
[01:19:58.560 --> 01:20:06.560]  which is a seizure of you and your car, the officer must have articulable probable cause,
[01:20:06.560 --> 01:20:12.560]  which he can only have if there is a crime being committed.
[01:20:12.560 --> 01:20:16.560]  Since this is an infraction, there is no crime.
[01:20:16.560 --> 01:20:20.560]  Thus, there is no probable cause.
[01:20:20.560 --> 01:20:22.560]  You follow?
[01:20:22.560 --> 01:20:23.560]  Yes.
[01:20:23.560 --> 01:20:29.560]  Okay, so everything the officer did was illegal.
[01:20:29.560 --> 01:20:39.560]  Everything he got from you and charged you with is now to be challenged as fruit of the poison tree
[01:20:39.560 --> 01:20:44.560]  for an unconstitutional and illegal seizure.
[01:20:44.560 --> 01:20:46.560]  Okay?
[01:20:46.560 --> 01:20:53.560]  So it's a Fourth and Fifth Amendment violation and then whatever articles and sections out of the
[01:20:53.560 --> 01:21:01.560]  California Constitution that prohibit it as well for them to seize you for an infraction
[01:21:01.560 --> 01:21:10.560]  and then search you by asking for any of your information and then using that against you in these cases.
[01:21:10.560 --> 01:21:15.560]  When they demand your license, your registration, or any of this other stuff,
[01:21:15.560 --> 01:21:21.560]  or they go to the records and start looking it up, that's a search.
[01:21:21.560 --> 01:21:22.560]  Okay?
[01:21:22.560 --> 01:21:29.560]  He had no probable cause to conduct that search, so that too was a crime.
[01:21:29.560 --> 01:21:36.560]  That makes all of his evidence and testimony inadmissible as fruit of the poison tree.
[01:21:36.560 --> 01:21:42.560]  So you will need to write a motion to dismiss based upon those facts
[01:21:42.560 --> 01:21:50.560]  and the California case law that goes with it, which I have, to get it all dismissed.
[01:21:50.560 --> 01:21:55.560]  If they refuse to dismiss it, then you need to sue the commissioner that's refusing to do so
[01:21:55.560 --> 01:21:59.560]  because he's acting without lawful authority.
[01:21:59.560 --> 01:22:01.560]  Okay.
[01:22:01.560 --> 01:22:04.560]  So writing, it would be like a letter that I'm writing?
[01:22:04.560 --> 01:22:07.560]  No, no, no, no, no.
[01:22:07.560 --> 01:22:09.560]  It is not a letter.
[01:22:09.560 --> 01:22:15.560]  It is an actual motion as if you're going to an actual court, which you're not,
[01:22:15.560 --> 01:22:20.560]  but you're going to treat it as if you are.
[01:22:20.560 --> 01:22:23.560]  Okay, but I have a court date tomorrow, so...
[01:22:23.560 --> 01:22:28.560]  Well, then you need to take everything I just said and write that down.
[01:22:28.560 --> 01:22:37.560]  Unfortunately, I don't think the archive of this is going to be posted in enough time for you to go back and do that.
[01:22:37.560 --> 01:22:45.560]  So if you're calling me from a cell phone, I hope that your call recording app is turned on.
[01:22:45.560 --> 01:22:48.560]  I don't have that app, but I'm writing everything down.
[01:22:48.560 --> 01:22:49.560]  Okay.
[01:22:49.560 --> 01:22:56.560]  Send me an email, Eddie, E-D-D-I-E, at ruleoflawradio.com,
[01:22:56.560 --> 01:23:02.560]  and I will send you this information copied from an email that I've already sent to many other people in California
[01:23:02.560 --> 01:23:05.560]  about what you need to do with this.
[01:23:05.560 --> 01:23:06.560]  Okay.
[01:23:06.560 --> 01:23:07.560]  Okay.
[01:23:07.560 --> 01:23:09.560]  I have Eddie at ruleoflaw...
[01:23:09.560 --> 01:23:14.560]  Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:23:14.560 --> 01:23:15.560]  Okay, perfect.
[01:23:15.560 --> 01:23:16.560]  I got it.
[01:23:16.560 --> 01:23:17.560]  Okay.
[01:23:17.560 --> 01:23:24.560]  So send that, and after I get done with the show and everything this evening, I will hunt up that information and reply back.
[01:23:24.560 --> 01:23:27.560]  Okay, perfect.
[01:23:27.560 --> 01:23:30.560]  Anything else I should...anything else I should know?
[01:23:30.560 --> 01:23:33.560]  Nothing that won't be in the email.
[01:23:33.560 --> 01:23:36.560]  Okay, so everything should be in the email?
[01:23:36.560 --> 01:23:37.560]  I'm hoping so.
[01:23:37.560 --> 01:23:41.560]  I hope I've gotten good enough at it by this time I can do it that way.
[01:23:41.560 --> 01:23:42.560]  Okay, all right.
[01:23:42.560 --> 01:23:43.560]  Perfect.
[01:23:43.560 --> 01:23:44.560]  All right.
[01:23:44.560 --> 01:23:46.560]  I'm just really nervous, so I don't know...
[01:23:46.560 --> 01:23:48.560]  Well, there's no reason to be nervous.
[01:23:48.560 --> 01:23:51.560]  There's nothing official about what's going on.
[01:23:51.560 --> 01:23:54.560]  This is what you...this is the attitude you need to have,
[01:23:54.560 --> 01:23:59.560]  and this is what you need to understand in order to get rid of your nervousness, okay?
[01:23:59.560 --> 01:24:03.560]  Do you have an ex-boyfriend that you really don't like?
[01:24:03.560 --> 01:24:04.560]  Yes.
[01:24:04.560 --> 01:24:11.560]  And you really don't like him because he did something really atrocious or bad to you?
[01:24:11.560 --> 01:24:12.560]  Yes.
[01:24:12.560 --> 01:24:16.560]  And did it really P.O. you when he did that?
[01:24:16.560 --> 01:24:17.560]  Yes.
[01:24:17.560 --> 01:24:24.560]  This moron you're going to see tomorrow is trying to do the same thing.
[01:24:24.560 --> 01:24:32.560]  He is trying to steal from you and try to make you enjoy it at the same time.
[01:24:32.560 --> 01:24:39.560]  That should piss you off because he's going to lie to your face
[01:24:39.560 --> 01:24:43.560]  and say that it's okay for him to do it.
[01:24:43.560 --> 01:24:47.560]  You need to go in there with the attitude that you're talking to a real,
[01:24:47.560 --> 01:24:53.560]  live criminal and you have the power to do something about it.
[01:24:53.560 --> 01:24:54.560]  Okay.
[01:24:54.560 --> 01:24:56.560]  It's easier said than done.
[01:24:56.560 --> 01:24:58.560]  Okay.
[01:24:58.560 --> 01:25:03.560]  Not if you think about that ex-boyfriend and how mad he made you, it's not.
[01:25:03.560 --> 01:25:09.560]  You keep that picture and that emotion in the forefront of your mind when you go in there,
[01:25:09.560 --> 01:25:12.560]  and you won't be as jittery as you think you will be.
[01:25:12.560 --> 01:25:14.560]  You will be angry.
[01:25:14.560 --> 01:25:17.560]  Just don't be out of control angry.
[01:25:17.560 --> 01:25:20.560]  Okay.
[01:25:20.560 --> 01:25:26.560]  Be that low, slow, crock pot kind of boiling anger that's not out of control
[01:25:26.560 --> 01:25:29.560]  and running over the sides of the pot, you know?
[01:25:29.560 --> 01:25:30.560]  Okay.
[01:25:30.560 --> 01:25:31.560]  Yes.
[01:25:31.560 --> 01:25:32.560]  Okay.
[01:25:32.560 --> 01:25:33.560]  I'll keep that in mind.
[01:25:33.560 --> 01:25:34.560]  Okay.
[01:25:34.560 --> 01:25:35.560]  So I'll send you an email and I'll look forward to it tonight.
[01:25:35.560 --> 01:25:36.560]  Okay.
[01:25:36.560 --> 01:25:37.560]  Okay.
[01:25:37.560 --> 01:25:38.560]  Awesome.
[01:25:38.560 --> 01:25:39.560]  Thank you.
[01:25:39.560 --> 01:25:40.560]  You're welcome.
[01:25:40.560 --> 01:25:41.560]  You have a good night.
[01:25:41.560 --> 01:25:42.560]  Thanks.
[01:25:42.560 --> 01:25:43.560]  Bye.
[01:25:43.560 --> 01:25:44.560]  Bye-bye.
[01:25:44.560 --> 01:25:45.560]  All right.
[01:25:45.560 --> 01:25:46.560]  Now we have Sonny in Georgia.
[01:25:46.560 --> 01:25:49.560]  Sonny, what did you do wrong?
[01:25:49.560 --> 01:25:59.560]  Oh, lots of things, Eddie, but in my particular case, I was pulled over last year
[01:25:59.560 --> 01:26:04.560]  because the officer didn't really have probable cause,
[01:26:04.560 --> 01:26:11.560]  but he said I only had one chain on a Bobcat on a trailer I was pulling.
[01:26:11.560 --> 01:26:16.560]  So he said I had an unsecured load, and even though I tried to tell him I wasn't in commerce,
[01:26:16.560 --> 01:26:23.560]  I tried to take away his probable cause, and didn't give him my license,
[01:26:23.560 --> 01:26:25.560]  he arrested me for that.
[01:26:25.560 --> 01:26:31.560]  And so here we are now, just a few days ago.
[01:26:31.560 --> 01:26:36.560]  While you're giving me this information, let me take this opportunity to get some more,
[01:26:36.560 --> 01:26:39.560]  because I may wind up yelling at you here in a minute,
[01:26:39.560 --> 01:26:43.560]  and I just want to do it for a good reason, if I have to do it at all.
[01:26:43.560 --> 01:26:47.560]  When you say you didn't give him your license,
[01:26:47.560 --> 01:26:52.560]  and you say that you told him you weren't in commerce,
[01:26:52.560 --> 01:26:59.560]  explain to me exactly what you said to convey those two thoughts.
[01:26:59.560 --> 01:27:12.560]  I told him that I had a license, but I was not using the license because I was not in commerce.
[01:27:12.560 --> 01:27:18.560]  I was not in commercial activity.
[01:27:18.560 --> 01:27:20.560]  Okay. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:27:20.560 --> 01:27:22.560]  I'm going to ask this, too.
[01:27:22.560 --> 01:27:25.560]  Do you have a copy of the transportation practice script?
[01:27:25.560 --> 01:27:26.560]  No, sir.
[01:27:26.560 --> 01:27:27.560]  Okay.
[01:27:27.560 --> 01:27:33.560]  You need to go to the logosradionetwork.com forward slash T-A-O page,
[01:27:33.560 --> 01:27:35.560]  and get a copy of that, and study that.
[01:27:35.560 --> 01:27:36.560]  Okay.
[01:27:36.560 --> 01:27:37.560]  And that will show you where you messed up.
[01:27:37.560 --> 01:27:39.560]  Now, let me clarify something here for you.
[01:27:39.560 --> 01:27:42.560]  Had you had the script, I was about to yell at you.
[01:27:42.560 --> 01:27:45.560]  But since you don't, I'm going to give you a break, and I'm going to explain this to you.
[01:27:45.560 --> 01:27:49.560]  You do not ever admit to having the license.
[01:27:49.560 --> 01:27:50.560]  You don't.
[01:27:50.560 --> 01:27:56.560]  And you don't ever tell them that the reason you're not giving it to them is because you're not in commerce.
[01:27:56.560 --> 01:27:58.560]  That's you attempting to educate the cop on the side of the road,
[01:27:58.560 --> 01:28:02.560]  which I try to get people to understand you never want to do.
[01:28:02.560 --> 01:28:07.560]  The only thing you do on the side of the road is ask questions.
[01:28:07.560 --> 01:28:10.560]  You answer questions by asking a question.
[01:28:10.560 --> 01:28:16.560]  When he says license, registration, and proof of financial responsibility, you ask a question.
[01:28:16.560 --> 01:28:20.560]  Officer, can any of the information you're demanding from me be used against me in a court of law
[01:28:20.560 --> 01:28:23.560]  to potentially incriminate me in any way?
[01:28:23.560 --> 01:28:28.560]  If it can, then I must invoke my right to remain silent and not provide you with that information.
[01:28:28.560 --> 01:28:36.560]  Do you intend to harm, punish me, or criminally charge me for invoking and using my protected rights?
[01:28:36.560 --> 01:28:41.560]  See, right there, if they didn't charge you for not producing what they commanded you to produce,
[01:28:41.560 --> 01:28:46.560]  even though it could be used against you or potentially incriminate you,
[01:28:46.560 --> 01:28:52.560]  that proves the statute is acting in violation of your rights and your protections.
[01:28:52.560 --> 01:28:54.560]  You see?
[01:28:54.560 --> 01:28:58.560]  The script is designed to have you convey information that makes a record
[01:28:58.560 --> 01:29:04.560]  explaining how your rights are being violated and exactly how that's happening.
[01:29:04.560 --> 01:29:08.560]  Because the cop invariably is going to say something stupid like,
[01:29:08.560 --> 01:29:11.560]  the law says you've got to give it to me.
[01:29:11.560 --> 01:29:17.560]  Right there, he has just admitted the basis for his unconstitutional actions
[01:29:17.560 --> 01:29:22.560]  is an equally unconstitutional law or statute.
[01:29:22.560 --> 01:29:26.560]  You follow?
[01:29:26.560 --> 01:29:32.560]  Are you saying when he says the law says you have to give it to me?
[01:29:32.560 --> 01:29:34.560]  That's what he's admitting into the record.
[01:29:34.560 --> 01:29:38.560]  When the law says you have to waive your rights to comply with my demands,
[01:29:38.560 --> 01:29:47.560]  he's admitting that his unconstitutional demands is presumably based upon an unconstitutional law or statute,
[01:29:47.560 --> 01:29:52.560]  because the statute cannot command you to waive your rights to comply with it.
[01:29:52.560 --> 01:29:55.560]  Hang on just a second, we'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:29:55.560 --> 01:30:01.560]  All right, folks, Rule of Law Radio will be right back.
[01:30:01.560 --> 01:30:02.560]  Having trouble breathing?
[01:30:02.560 --> 01:30:07.560]  You might want to reach for a bitter tasting substance like grapefruit peel and take a big whiff.
[01:30:07.560 --> 01:30:10.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and in a moment I'll tell you how bitter foods
[01:30:10.560 --> 01:30:14.560]  could be traditional inhalers for opening blocked air passages.
[01:30:14.560 --> 01:30:16.560]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:16.560 --> 01:30:20.560]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:20.560 --> 01:30:25.560]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.560 --> 01:30:30.560]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:30.560 --> 01:30:33.560]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.560 --> 01:30:36.560]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:30:36.560 --> 01:30:40.560]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:40.560 --> 01:30:44.560]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:44.560 --> 01:30:48.560]  Bitter foods may soon give pharmaceutical inhalers a run for their money.
[01:30:48.560 --> 01:30:52.560]  Researchers have found that inhaling bitter substances opens bronchial airways
[01:30:52.560 --> 01:30:56.560]  better than any known asthma medication on the market.
[01:30:56.560 --> 01:31:01.560]  Apparently the bitter taste receptors we have on our tongues are also present in our lungs.
[01:31:01.560 --> 01:31:06.560]  If something tastes bitter in your mouth, the receptors in your lungs will pick up the bitter scent molecules too.
[01:31:06.560 --> 01:31:09.560]  The lungs react by opening up the airways.
[01:31:09.560 --> 01:31:13.560]  Scientists are experimenting with aerosols made of bitter substances like quinine,
[01:31:13.560 --> 01:31:16.560]  the ingredient that gives tonic water its bite.
[01:31:16.560 --> 01:31:22.560]  They believe this could help bring relief to millions of people suffering with bronchitis, emphysema, and asthma.
[01:31:22.560 --> 01:31:30.560]  This is your Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.560 --> 01:31:35.560]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:35.560 --> 01:31:37.560]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:37.560 --> 01:31:42.560]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.560 --> 01:31:45.560]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:45.560 --> 01:31:48.560]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.560 --> 01:31:50.560]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.560 --> 01:31:52.560]  I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:52.560 --> 01:31:54.560]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:54.560 --> 01:31:57.560]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.560 --> 01:32:00.560]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.560 --> 01:32:02.560]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:02.560 --> 01:32:05.560]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:05.560 --> 01:32:10.560]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their Kim Trails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:10.560 --> 01:32:13.560]  Okay, I might be kidding about the Kim Trails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:13.560 --> 01:32:18.560]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you
[01:32:18.560 --> 01:32:20.560]  with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:20.560 --> 01:32:26.560]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.560 --> 01:32:31.560]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:31.560 --> 01:32:38.560]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.560 --> 01:32:40.560]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off.
[01:32:40.560 --> 01:32:45.560]  And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.560 --> 01:32:50.560]  Those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.560 --> 01:32:56.560]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.560 --> 01:32:58.560]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.560 --> 01:33:03.560]  May not actually be kidding about Kim Trails.
[01:33:03.560 --> 01:33:12.560]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:12.560 --> 01:33:41.560]  All right, folks, we are back in rule of law radio land.
[01:33:41.560 --> 01:33:44.560]  And we're still talking to Sonny in Georgia.
[01:33:44.560 --> 01:33:46.560]  All right, Sonny.
[01:33:46.560 --> 01:33:48.560]  Now, anyway, back to what I was saying.
[01:33:48.560 --> 01:33:57.560]  By asking those questions, we're making a record that their audio, video, and hopefully your audio and video will have
[01:33:57.560 --> 01:34:05.560]  and show that all you attempted to do throughout this proceeding was to protect yourself and your rights.
[01:34:05.560 --> 01:34:11.560]  And all the officer did was use color of law to violate them.
[01:34:11.560 --> 01:34:13.560]  Okay?
[01:34:13.560 --> 01:34:14.560]  Okay.
[01:34:14.560 --> 01:34:17.560]  That's the whole purpose of what's in the script.
[01:34:17.560 --> 01:34:18.560]  So learn from that.
[01:34:18.560 --> 01:34:27.560]  Everything in that script is based upon United States Supreme Court opinion on what constitutes the proper way to invoke
[01:34:27.560 --> 01:34:36.560]  demand to protect your rights from intrusion or waiver with or without your knowledge.
[01:34:36.560 --> 01:34:41.560]  He did have dash cam audio and video.
[01:34:41.560 --> 01:34:43.560]  Is there a trick to getting discovery on that?
[01:34:43.560 --> 01:34:44.560]  There is no trick.
[01:34:44.560 --> 01:34:49.560]  You simply file a motion for discovery to get it.
[01:34:49.560 --> 01:34:52.560]  Okay.
[01:34:52.560 --> 01:34:53.560]  Okay.
[01:34:53.560 --> 01:34:57.560]  The thing about it is they're going to use it against you.
[01:34:57.560 --> 01:34:59.560]  You have a right to see it.
[01:34:59.560 --> 01:35:04.560]  You have a right to hear it.
[01:35:04.560 --> 01:35:05.560]  Okay.
[01:35:05.560 --> 01:35:10.560]  So when you file your motion for discovery, make sure that you request it from both locations.
[01:35:10.560 --> 01:35:16.560]  The prosecuting attorney's office is required to turn over any evidence they intend to use against you either by
[01:35:16.560 --> 01:35:23.560]  copying it or allowing you to make copies of it or to inspect it and take photos of it.
[01:35:23.560 --> 01:35:26.560]  So if they have video, they're required to turn it over to you.
[01:35:26.560 --> 01:35:30.560]  But you also request it from the police department.
[01:35:30.560 --> 01:35:34.560]  Then as soon as you get them, you compare them.
[01:35:34.560 --> 01:35:43.560]  See if either one of them is different from the other, which shows somebody edited one of the copies you got.
[01:35:43.560 --> 01:35:46.560]  Now you have a disparity in evidence.
[01:35:46.560 --> 01:35:52.560]  Now you can call that evidence into question because it's been tampered with.
[01:35:52.560 --> 01:35:53.560]  Do you follow?
[01:35:53.560 --> 01:35:54.560]  Yes.
[01:35:54.560 --> 01:35:56.560]  All right.
[01:35:56.560 --> 01:35:59.560]  So what other questions do you have?
[01:35:59.560 --> 01:36:06.560]  Well, in the summons that they sent me, my middle name was completely wrong.
[01:36:06.560 --> 01:36:10.560]  They listed it as Lee, and it should have been Lesson.
[01:36:10.560 --> 01:36:18.560]  Is that anything dismissable or anything that would cause a delay or is that just a nothing?
[01:36:18.560 --> 01:36:19.560]  Wait.
[01:36:19.560 --> 01:36:20.560]  Say that.
[01:36:20.560 --> 01:36:22.560]  Ask that one more time.
[01:36:22.560 --> 01:36:32.560]  In the summons that they sent me to summon me to court for tomorrow, the middle name was completely wrong.
[01:36:32.560 --> 01:36:42.560]  Then you can simply assert, I'm here because I received this, but the name on this isn't me.
[01:36:42.560 --> 01:36:48.560]  And they will probably have to do a continuance in order to correct it, which they will probably do.
[01:36:48.560 --> 01:36:57.560]  And depending upon how severe, they might even consider just dismissing it for the time that's already been wasted and the cost already involved.
[01:36:57.560 --> 01:36:59.560]  You never know.
[01:36:59.560 --> 01:37:04.560]  But once you raise the issue of that's not me, they're going to ask to see identifying information.
[01:37:04.560 --> 01:37:11.560]  They're going to get the correct information, and they're most likely to either correct it right there or reissue.
[01:37:11.560 --> 01:37:17.560]  But if they try to correct it right there, you need to object to timely notice.
[01:37:17.560 --> 01:37:19.560]  Objection.
[01:37:19.560 --> 01:37:22.560]  I had no indication that this particularly applied to me.
[01:37:22.560 --> 01:37:29.560]  I just wish to be present to inform you that you had sent this to the wrongly named individual at my address.
[01:37:29.560 --> 01:37:42.560]  So I'm not prepared to do anything with you guys today because I had, you know, I had no intention of showing up under this name here.
[01:37:42.560 --> 01:37:50.560]  Be prepared regardless, but at least run them through the wringer while you're doing it.
[01:37:50.560 --> 01:37:53.560]  Okay. Good.
[01:37:53.560 --> 01:38:01.560]  So that would be the best way to just sort of continue this until I can study a little bit more and get a better plan of action?
[01:38:01.560 --> 01:38:04.560]  Potentially. It just depends upon you.
[01:38:04.560 --> 01:38:09.560]  Okay.
[01:38:09.560 --> 01:38:12.560]  Okay. Yeah.
[01:38:12.560 --> 01:38:16.560]  I thought that the thing had just sort of gone away.
[01:38:16.560 --> 01:38:20.560]  But this was just sort of sprung up here.
[01:38:20.560 --> 01:38:26.560]  And so, well, thank you.
[01:38:26.560 --> 01:38:27.560]  Thank you so much, Eddie.
[01:38:27.560 --> 01:38:28.560]  You're very welcome.
[01:38:28.560 --> 01:38:30.560]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:38:30.560 --> 01:38:31.560]  Yes, sir.
[01:38:31.560 --> 01:38:34.560]  All right. You have a good night and good luck.
[01:38:34.560 --> 01:38:39.560]  All right. Now we're going to go to Mark and Florida is back.
[01:38:39.560 --> 01:38:41.560]  Hey, Mark, you want to finish that up now?
[01:38:41.560 --> 01:38:43.560]  Can you hear me?
[01:38:43.560 --> 01:38:44.560]  Yeah, I can hear you.
[01:38:44.560 --> 01:38:46.560]  I didn't lose the phone connection.
[01:38:46.560 --> 01:38:50.560]  I lost the connection with you guys somehow.
[01:38:50.560 --> 01:38:52.560]  Well, actually, we could hear you just fine.
[01:38:52.560 --> 01:38:56.560]  And I was talking the whole time until you finally said, are you there?
[01:38:56.560 --> 01:38:59.560]  And then after that, I kept waiting to see if you could hear us again.
[01:38:59.560 --> 01:39:04.560]  And then I had to cut you loose so I could get to somebody else because I figured you'd call back in.
[01:39:04.560 --> 01:39:07.560]  Yeah, I couldn't hear you.
[01:39:07.560 --> 01:39:09.560]  The radio dropped off or something.
[01:39:09.560 --> 01:39:22.560]  Anyway, getting back to the criminal charges against them, you said I can bring Florida statutes against them
[01:39:22.560 --> 01:39:30.560]  and also something like Title 18, sections 241 and 242?
[01:39:30.560 --> 01:39:37.560]  Yeah, you can sue both under the state and federal constitutional protections.
[01:39:37.560 --> 01:39:41.560]  I'm not talking about suing. I'm talking about criminal charges now.
[01:39:41.560 --> 01:39:44.560]  You can file criminal charges in both places as well.
[01:39:44.560 --> 01:39:50.560]  The question is whether or not the Fed has jurisdiction over the particular criminal charge you're alleging.
[01:39:50.560 --> 01:39:58.560]  If you want to file against police officers, file with the DOJ.
[01:39:58.560 --> 01:40:01.560]  It'd be deprivation of rights under color of law.
[01:40:01.560 --> 01:40:02.560]  No, no, no, no, no, no.
[01:40:02.560 --> 01:40:06.560]  Deprivation of rights under color of law is a lawsuit claim.
[01:40:06.560 --> 01:40:14.560]  Crime is something specific, aggravated assault, excessive force, kidnapping.
[01:40:14.560 --> 01:40:28.560]  Those are the crimes, not violations of rights under color of law, official oppression, official misconduct.
[01:40:28.560 --> 01:40:36.560]  Title 18, U.S. Code, section 242 is criminal.
[01:40:36.560 --> 01:40:45.560]  Again, you have to understand what Title 18 applies to, and it doesn't work the way it's made to look like it works.
[01:40:45.560 --> 01:40:48.560]  Trust me on this.
[01:40:48.560 --> 01:40:50.560]  I trust you. Believe me.
[01:40:50.560 --> 01:40:58.560]  All right. So if you're going to complain, complain to the DOJ and just assert the facts of what happened.
[01:40:58.560 --> 01:41:03.560]  Let them decide what charges apply.
[01:41:03.560 --> 01:41:08.560]  Okay. And getting in touch with those people is...
[01:41:08.560 --> 01:41:11.560]  They have a website which makes filing it very, very easy.
[01:41:11.560 --> 01:41:14.560]  You can download the forms. You can fill it out online.
[01:41:14.560 --> 01:41:18.560]  There's all kinds of ways to file with the DOJ.
[01:41:18.560 --> 01:41:22.560]  Okay, good, because I've tried talking to the U.S. attorney.
[01:41:22.560 --> 01:41:28.560]  No, don't ever talk to a U.S. attorney unless you've already bought and paid for him.
[01:41:28.560 --> 01:41:37.560]  Right. And I did talk to the FBI, and they took a statement from me, and I haven't heard anything back.
[01:41:37.560 --> 01:41:43.560]  But to move forward, false imprisonment, Florida doesn't have that statute.
[01:41:43.560 --> 01:41:48.560]  So I'm assuming you cannot charge them with kidnapping because of that.
[01:41:48.560 --> 01:41:51.560]  Did I hear you say that once before?
[01:41:51.560 --> 01:41:58.560]  There has to be a law for the offense for there to be an offense.
[01:41:58.560 --> 01:42:05.560]  I thought I heard you say, or maybe Randy did, that Texas does not have a false imprisonment law.
[01:42:05.560 --> 01:42:09.560]  No, Texas does not have a false arrest law.
[01:42:09.560 --> 01:42:14.560]  It's false imprisonment here. It's not false arrest.
[01:42:14.560 --> 01:42:20.560]  Okay. I have not found false arrest in Florida statutes yet.
[01:42:20.560 --> 01:42:24.560]  Yeah, the cause of action or the complaint will be probably...
[01:42:24.560 --> 01:42:32.560]  In that case, see, what you charge them with is aggravated kidnapping and false imprisonment.
[01:42:32.560 --> 01:42:37.560]  You charge them with aggravated assault. They were armed, right?
[01:42:37.560 --> 01:42:38.560]  Oh, yes.
[01:42:38.560 --> 01:42:40.560]  They're public servants, right?
[01:42:40.560 --> 01:42:41.560]  Yes.
[01:42:41.560 --> 01:42:46.560]  They acted under color of law without lawful authority, right?
[01:42:46.560 --> 01:42:47.560]  Correct.
[01:42:47.560 --> 01:42:49.560]  Aggravated assault. Look it up.
[01:42:49.560 --> 01:42:55.560]  Guaranteed, all that's required for a public servant to commit aggravated assault is to commit simple assault
[01:42:55.560 --> 01:43:01.560]  while displaying a deadly weapon and be a public servant in the process.
[01:43:01.560 --> 01:43:05.560]  In which case, here in Texas, that's actually a first-degree felony.
[01:43:05.560 --> 01:43:12.560]  If you're not a public servant and do those things, it's a second-degree felony.
[01:43:12.560 --> 01:43:22.560]  So we actually consider it more egregious for a public servant to commit aggravated assault than we do just a common criminal.
[01:43:22.560 --> 01:43:23.560]  As it should be.
[01:43:23.560 --> 01:43:26.560]  Exactly.
[01:43:26.560 --> 01:43:30.560]  I'm not sure if Florida makes that distinction, but I will find out.
[01:43:30.560 --> 01:43:37.560]  Now, that's not my next question. Uh-oh, old music.
[01:43:37.560 --> 01:43:40.560]  Yes, sir, we got another break coming up.
[01:43:40.560 --> 01:43:45.560]  So we'll finish you up when we get to the other side here, which is coming into our last segment.
[01:43:45.560 --> 01:43:50.560]  So I've got a couple of other callers after you, so we'll try to make it quick, okay?
[01:43:50.560 --> 01:43:53.560]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:53.560 --> 01:43:59.560]  Y'all hang on, we're coming up on our last segment for the end of the show, so we'll be right back.
[01:43:59.560 --> 01:44:03.560]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:03.560 --> 01:44:04.560]  Sorry.
[01:44:04.560 --> 01:44:07.560]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.560 --> 01:44:08.560]  What?
[01:44:08.560 --> 01:44:12.560]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.560 --> 01:44:19.560]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.560 --> 01:44:25.560]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.560 --> 01:44:30.560]  Fortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.560 --> 01:44:36.560]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports-zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.560 --> 01:44:43.560]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.560 --> 01:44:54.560]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.560 --> 01:45:00.560]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:00.560 --> 01:45:03.560]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.560 --> 01:45:15.560]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, poor CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.560 --> 01:45:18.560]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.560 --> 01:45:22.560]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.560 --> 01:45:27.560]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.560 --> 01:45:34.560]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.560 --> 01:45:43.560]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.560 --> 01:45:52.560]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.560 --> 01:46:14.560]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:14.560 --> 01:46:25.560]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one? If you could not wait any longer, would your purpose test be done?
[01:46:25.560 --> 01:46:54.560]  All right, folks, we are back, and we're still talking to Mark in Florida. All right, Mark, what else you got?
[01:46:54.560 --> 01:47:03.560]  I want to tell you about this quick semi-legal process, Florida statute. It is a, I believe it's a third-degree felony.
[01:47:03.560 --> 01:47:12.560]  Can I charge the assistant state attorneys, two of them, one at each courthouse, for that?
[01:47:12.560 --> 01:47:21.560]  If you can show that what they served you was illegal or unlawful, you can make a charge.
[01:47:21.560 --> 01:47:25.560]  It doesn't mean anybody will do anything about it, but you certainly can make the charge.
[01:47:25.560 --> 01:47:35.560]  You have to remember, though, in most states, if you make a false complaint, that would be you as well,
[01:47:35.560 --> 01:47:44.560]  without actually having at least enough facts to believe the crime itself has been done,
[01:47:44.560 --> 01:47:48.560]  then you can get charged with that just as well as they can.
[01:47:48.560 --> 01:47:55.560]  Okay, well, this is all based on the knowingly prosecute, as I just did, on the two misdemeanors,
[01:47:55.560 --> 01:48:02.560]  because he finally sat down and watched the videos from the officer and said there was no violation of law there.
[01:48:02.560 --> 01:48:04.560]  Now, this drug out there, three or four...
[01:48:04.560 --> 01:48:10.560]  Right, that's a malicious prosecution action right there.
[01:48:10.560 --> 01:48:11.560]  That's civil, right?
[01:48:11.560 --> 01:48:15.560]  That's you suing him for that, yeah.
[01:48:15.560 --> 01:48:19.560]  Okay, that was the other question.
[01:48:19.560 --> 01:48:21.560]  One quick question.
[01:48:21.560 --> 01:48:25.560]  You mentioned the audio app for recording phone calls.
[01:48:25.560 --> 01:48:32.560]  Do you have a favorite audio app and also, more importantly, favorite video app?
[01:48:32.560 --> 01:48:38.560]  If you have an Android phone, the one that I use is called Call Recorder,
[01:48:38.560 --> 01:48:41.560]  and now it's called, I think, Super Call Recorder,
[01:48:41.560 --> 01:48:46.560]  and it automatically records both sides of all incoming and outgoing calls.
[01:48:46.560 --> 01:48:51.560]  This allows me to keep an MP3 record of every conversation I have on my cell phone,
[01:48:51.560 --> 01:48:54.560]  which when I'm talking to people that I'm helping is really useful,
[01:48:54.560 --> 01:48:59.560]  but it's also very useful if I'm calling officials to get information,
[01:48:59.560 --> 01:49:05.560]  and I can repeat it, verbatim everything they said, you know, because I've got a record of it.
[01:49:05.560 --> 01:49:09.560]  As far as video apps, it really depends on what I'm videoing,
[01:49:09.560 --> 01:49:12.560]  but everything I do is on an Android.
[01:49:12.560 --> 01:49:16.560]  If you've got an iPhone, you're going to be pretty much out of luck on a lot of this stuff
[01:49:16.560 --> 01:49:20.560]  because a lot of these apps, iPhones don't allow you to install.
[01:49:20.560 --> 01:49:26.560]  And what capabilities the ones on an iPhone have, I have no idea.
[01:49:26.560 --> 01:49:30.560]  I've got Android, but I've looked at a lot of video apps,
[01:49:30.560 --> 01:49:35.560]  but I need something for police encounters that is going to go to the web,
[01:49:35.560 --> 01:49:37.560]  not be stored on the phone.
[01:49:37.560 --> 01:49:42.560]  Well, then you're going to have to look for particularized streaming applications for that,
[01:49:42.560 --> 01:49:46.560]  and that really is going to depend upon how good your phone service is
[01:49:46.560 --> 01:49:49.560]  as to how well that's going to work wherever you're at.
[01:49:49.560 --> 01:49:53.560]  If you don't have an Internet connection and an Internet plan on your phone,
[01:49:53.560 --> 01:49:55.560]  it's not going to stream.
[01:49:55.560 --> 01:49:56.560]  It's got nowhere to go.
[01:49:56.560 --> 01:50:00.560]  And if you do have an Internet plan, you better make darn sure it's a big one
[01:50:00.560 --> 01:50:06.560]  if you're going to be streaming video to some remote location for storage.
[01:50:06.560 --> 01:50:10.560]  What you need is mobile apps from some of the streaming services
[01:50:10.560 --> 01:50:14.560]  like Ustream or iStream or any of those places,
[01:50:14.560 --> 01:50:18.560]  and find out which one would have the best thing for you to use on your phone
[01:50:18.560 --> 01:50:21.560]  if you're going to live stream.
[01:50:21.560 --> 01:50:22.560]  Do you have one on your phone?
[01:50:22.560 --> 01:50:27.560]  I do not have anything that does live streaming on my phone.
[01:50:27.560 --> 01:50:33.560]  Everything I record is on my phone, but everything on my phone is encrypted.
[01:50:33.560 --> 01:50:35.560]  Therefore, it doesn't matter if they get into it.
[01:50:35.560 --> 01:50:39.560]  They would have to erase everything on it to affect anything.
[01:50:39.560 --> 01:50:43.560]  And the problem there would be that being encrypted
[01:50:43.560 --> 01:50:46.560]  and having separate media cards for everything,
[01:50:46.560 --> 01:50:53.560]  they can erase and reset the phone, but they can't erase the media card.
[01:50:53.560 --> 01:50:55.560]  You're talking about your SD card?
[01:50:55.560 --> 01:51:00.560]  Yeah, so the only thing they could do there is steal that.
[01:51:00.560 --> 01:51:01.560]  That's been known to happen.
[01:51:01.560 --> 01:51:03.560]  Yeah, I know that's been known to happen too.
[01:51:03.560 --> 01:51:06.560]  That's why generally if I'm going to have one of these encounters,
[01:51:06.560 --> 01:51:10.560]  I have more than one recording device, one of which they may find,
[01:51:10.560 --> 01:51:13.560]  but the rest of them they're not.
[01:51:13.560 --> 01:51:14.560]  All right.
[01:51:14.560 --> 01:51:15.560]  I appreciate your help.
[01:51:15.560 --> 01:51:16.560]  I'm going to let you go.
[01:51:16.560 --> 01:51:17.560]  Get on to the next one.
[01:51:17.560 --> 01:51:19.560]  All right, Mark, thanks for calling in.
[01:51:19.560 --> 01:51:20.560]  Have a good one.
[01:51:20.560 --> 01:51:21.560]  You too.
[01:51:21.560 --> 01:51:22.560]  Bye-bye.
[01:51:22.560 --> 01:51:24.560]  All right, now we have Doug in Wisconsin.
[01:51:24.560 --> 01:51:28.560]  Doug, what can we do for you?
[01:51:28.560 --> 01:51:33.560]  Well, yes, I was about two weeks ago pulled over by the State Patrol
[01:51:33.560 --> 01:51:39.560]  on the interstate for a loud muffler, tried to do the script,
[01:51:39.560 --> 01:51:45.560]  and I didn't give the officer anything, but my name and date of birth
[01:51:45.560 --> 01:51:49.560]  ended up with a no insurance ticket,
[01:51:49.560 --> 01:51:52.560]  and I wanted to get a little guidance on how you think I should proceed.
[01:51:52.560 --> 01:51:55.560]  Well, first thing is, what is the statutory
[01:51:55.560 --> 01:52:00.560]  and the underlying law requirements for the offense of a loud muffler?
[01:52:00.560 --> 01:52:03.560]  Does it require a decibel reading?
[01:52:03.560 --> 01:52:06.560]  What method did the officer use to get that decibel reading?
[01:52:06.560 --> 01:52:08.560]  What device did he use to do that?
[01:52:08.560 --> 01:52:12.560]  Were you moving and he's stationary or was he following you in traffic?
[01:52:12.560 --> 01:52:17.560]  If any of these things make it where there was multiple cars, multiple anything,
[01:52:17.560 --> 01:52:21.560]  how could he positively identify audio on his devices
[01:52:21.560 --> 01:52:24.560]  coming from your car versus the surrounding cars?
[01:52:24.560 --> 01:52:29.560]  You see how quickly this can get convoluted?
[01:52:29.560 --> 01:52:32.560]  Well, I think he was just practicing, to be honest.
[01:52:32.560 --> 01:52:36.560]  Okay, how does that answer my question?
[01:52:36.560 --> 01:52:39.560]  Do you understand what I'm saying about the various ways you can attack
[01:52:39.560 --> 01:52:46.560]  his so-called evidence and the basis for his so-called probable cause?
[01:52:46.560 --> 01:52:51.560]  Right, yes, I understand, but the ticket ended up being for the insurance.
[01:52:51.560 --> 01:52:54.560]  You misunderstand.
[01:52:54.560 --> 01:53:02.560]  He cannot stop you for one thing that he had no probable cause to stop you for
[01:53:02.560 --> 01:53:04.560]  and then write a ticket for something else.
[01:53:04.560 --> 01:53:10.560]  It's entirely different if he can establish probable cause for the one thing
[01:53:10.560 --> 01:53:15.560]  and then chooses not to charge you with that but charge you with something else.
[01:53:15.560 --> 01:53:22.560]  So first thing you have to do is show that the bogus pulls you over for a loud muffler allegation
[01:53:22.560 --> 01:53:25.560]  is false.
[01:53:25.560 --> 01:53:31.560]  If you can show that is false, then you can get everything else knocked out
[01:53:31.560 --> 01:53:36.560]  as fruit of the poison tree for an illegal search and seizure,
[01:53:36.560 --> 01:53:40.560]  even if it's not an infraction.
[01:53:40.560 --> 01:53:45.560]  Fake probable cause is still no probable cause.
[01:53:45.560 --> 01:53:48.560]  You understand?
[01:53:48.560 --> 01:53:50.560]  I think so.
[01:53:50.560 --> 01:54:01.560]  What does the statute, if there is any statute, state is the criteria for such a charge?
[01:54:01.560 --> 01:54:05.560]  Okay, I have the information for the insurance part in front of me.
[01:54:05.560 --> 01:54:09.560]  Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:54:09.560 --> 01:54:16.560]  The insurance does not matter if the stop was illegal.
[01:54:16.560 --> 01:54:22.560]  We cannot determine if the stop is illegal without knowing what the statute is
[01:54:22.560 --> 01:54:28.560]  for his original alleged probable cause.
[01:54:28.560 --> 01:54:35.560]  Okay, I have a court date in about a month.
[01:54:35.560 --> 01:54:42.560]  Now, how would you proceed with the motions based on what we just talked about with the muffler?
[01:54:42.560 --> 01:54:48.560]  Well, again, that depends upon what the statute says, which you obviously haven't read.
[01:54:48.560 --> 01:54:52.560]  There's two things you need to do here, ASAP.
[01:54:52.560 --> 01:54:58.560]  You need to file a motion for discovery with both the prosecutor and the police department
[01:54:58.560 --> 01:55:09.560]  demanding copies of any audio and video recordings maintained by that officer and or his cruiser relating to this encounter.
[01:55:09.560 --> 01:55:11.560]  Okay?
[01:55:11.560 --> 01:55:12.560]  Okay.
[01:55:12.560 --> 01:55:15.560]  Compare those two recordings when you get them.
[01:55:15.560 --> 01:55:19.560]  See if they are different in any way.
[01:55:19.560 --> 01:55:29.560]  Find the section where it states that the reason he stopped you was related to a so-called loud muffler.
[01:55:29.560 --> 01:55:33.560]  If that is what he used to make the stop,
[01:55:33.560 --> 01:55:41.560]  and you can show that he did not have the necessary probable cause under the statute to make such a stop,
[01:55:41.560 --> 01:55:49.560]  then you can get all related charges dismissed as fruit of the poison tree.
[01:55:49.560 --> 01:55:58.560]  But I thought the whole concept was that it's a motor vehicle violation to begin with, and I'm not on a motor vehicle.
[01:55:58.560 --> 01:56:05.560]  Again, do you know anything about that argument in the state you're in?
[01:56:05.560 --> 01:56:16.560]  Have you researched the laws and the codes to know what the actual law is and what it relates to?
[01:56:16.560 --> 01:56:18.560]  No, I haven't.
[01:56:18.560 --> 01:56:19.560]  No, you haven't.
[01:56:19.560 --> 01:56:28.560]  So we have to fight with the best information we have, not something I can't pour into your brain overnight, right?
[01:56:28.560 --> 01:56:29.560]  Okay.
[01:56:29.560 --> 01:56:37.560]  You've got a month. Do you think yourself capable of absorbing, dissecting, analyzing, and internalizing all that information
[01:56:37.560 --> 01:56:47.560]  necessary to make a not engaged in commerce argument using just the statutes and Constitution of your state?
[01:56:47.560 --> 01:56:48.560]  I would think so.
[01:56:48.560 --> 01:56:54.560]  You would? Do you know how long it took me to get to that point?
[01:56:54.560 --> 01:57:00.560]  Fifteen years.
[01:57:00.560 --> 01:57:02.560]  Okay.
[01:57:02.560 --> 01:57:09.560]  So trust me, you will have a lot of research to do before you even get close to what you think you want to know.
[01:57:09.560 --> 01:57:13.560]  And I can't tell you where to find it because I don't live in Wisconsin.
[01:57:13.560 --> 01:57:18.560]  I haven't researched how you guys organize stuff and how you write it.
[01:57:18.560 --> 01:57:24.560]  It should be similar, but that don't mean it will be exactly the same.
[01:57:24.560 --> 01:57:25.560]  Okay.
[01:57:25.560 --> 01:57:36.560]  So what I'm trying to offer you is the best route to make your defense with what you have with minimal skill set and knowledge on your behalf.
[01:57:36.560 --> 01:57:39.560]  Now, you want to try to take the time to absorb this other information?
[01:57:39.560 --> 01:57:45.560]  Please be my guest, and I wish you all the power in the world to do that.
[01:57:45.560 --> 01:57:46.560]  Okay?
[01:57:46.560 --> 01:57:52.560]  But I would not be hanging my hat on that if I were you because you ain't got the time.
[01:57:52.560 --> 01:58:03.560]  Read the statute on that so-called loud muffler violation and call me Monday night again with those statutes.
[01:58:03.560 --> 01:58:08.560]  Preferably you will email me this week with links to those statutes.
[01:58:08.560 --> 01:58:15.560]  Then I might be able to help you even more when we call in on Monday, okay?
[01:58:15.560 --> 01:58:16.560]  Okay, I appreciate it.
[01:58:16.560 --> 01:58:17.560]  All right.
[01:58:17.560 --> 01:58:18.560]  Thanks for calling in, Doug.
[01:58:18.560 --> 01:58:19.560]  All right.
[01:58:19.560 --> 01:58:20.560]  Chas, I'm sorry, man.
[01:58:20.560 --> 01:58:22.560]  I ran out of time before I could get to you.
[01:58:22.560 --> 01:58:24.560]  I appreciate you calling in, though.
[01:58:24.560 --> 01:58:30.560]  Please call us back next Monday, or if it's something else that Randy can help you with, call him on Thursday or Friday.
[01:58:30.560 --> 01:58:32.560]  Folks, I want to thank you all for listening.
[01:58:32.560 --> 01:58:34.560]  I want to thank you all for supporting us.
[01:58:34.560 --> 01:58:36.560]  Please continue to do so.
[01:58:36.560 --> 01:58:44.560]  Don't forget to donate to the fundraiser and for the constitutional challenge motion if you want to purchase it and you live in Texas or learn about it in yours.
[01:58:44.560 --> 01:58:48.560]  Y'all have a great week, good night, and God bless.
[01:59:15.560 --> 01:59:20.560]  or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.560 --> 01:59:29.560]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.560 --> 01:59:32.560]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.560 --> 01:59:40.560]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.560 --> 01:59:49.560]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.560 --> 01:59:53.560]  Looking for some truth? You found it.
[01:59:53.560 --> 02:00:10.560]  Logosradionetwork.com