[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the deli
[00:08.000 --> 00:10.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:10.000 --> 00:23.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.000 --> 00:29.000]  Markets for Wednesday the 27th of January 2016 opened up with gold at $1,120 an ounce,
[00:29.000 --> 00:35.000]  silver at $14.48 an ounce, Texas crude at $31.45 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently
[00:35.000 --> 00:44.000]  sitting at about 395 U.S. currency.
[00:44.000 --> 00:50.000]  Today in history, Thursday, January 27th, 1825, the U.S. Congress approves Indian territory
[00:50.000 --> 00:52.000]  in what is present-day Oklahoma.
[00:52.000 --> 01:01.000]  This cleared the way for the forced relocation of eastern Indians known as the Trail of Tears.
[01:01.000 --> 01:05.000]  In recent news, the Vatican announced over the weekend that Pope Francis will be visiting
[01:05.000 --> 01:10.000]  Sweden later this year to mark the 500th anniversary of Martin Luther's writing and posting of
[01:10.000 --> 01:16.000]  the 95 Theses on the front doors of All Saints Church in Wittenberg, Germany, October 31st,
[01:16.000 --> 01:17.000]  1517.
[01:17.000 --> 01:21.000]  Amongst other points, Luther primarily wrote argumentations against the Roman Catholic
[01:21.000 --> 01:26.000]  theology of indulgences, essentially the selling of forgiveness from temporal punishment from
[01:26.000 --> 01:30.000]  sins for money, a practice still upheld by the church.
[01:30.000 --> 01:34.000]  On October 31st of this year, Francis is set to be at the southern Swedish city of Lund,
[01:34.000 --> 01:38.000]  where the Lutheran World Federation was founded in 1947.
[01:38.000 --> 01:42.000]  While his predecessors have visited Protestant churches, Francis has come under criticism
[01:42.000 --> 01:46.000]  from traditionalists and conservatives within the church who accuse him of sending conflicting
[01:46.000 --> 01:49.000]  signals about interfaith relations.
[01:49.000 --> 01:53.000]  Catholic traditionalists have accused Francis of making too many concessions to Lutherans
[01:53.000 --> 01:56.000]  since both religions will be using Luther's common prayer.
[01:56.000 --> 02:01.000]  During the 2017 Reformation commemoration services being held jointly between the two
[02:01.000 --> 02:05.000]  churches, which they say excessively praised Luther, who was historically condemned as
[02:05.000 --> 02:07.000]  a heretic and excommunicated.
[02:07.000 --> 02:12.000]  Pope Francis has made ecumenism one of the main themes of his papacy, considering he
[02:12.000 --> 02:16.000]  has already visited the Lutheran Church of Rome, the Waldensian Protestant community
[02:16.000 --> 02:21.000]  in northern Italy, Rome's Jewish synagogue, and is soon due to become the first pope to
[02:21.000 --> 02:29.000]  visit Rome's mosque later this year.
[02:29.000 --> 02:33.000]  Marvin Minsky, a pioneer in the field of artificial intelligence at the Massachusetts Institute
[02:33.000 --> 02:36.000]  of Technology, died Sunday at the age of 88.
[02:36.000 --> 02:39.000]  Minsky viewed the brain as a machine whose function can be studied and replicated in
[02:39.000 --> 02:44.000]  the computer, and he considered how machines might be endowed with common sense or artificial
[02:44.000 --> 02:46.000]  intelligence.
[02:46.000 --> 02:49.000]  Daniella Russ, director of MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory,
[02:49.000 --> 02:55.000]  said that Minsky helped create the vision of artificial intelligence as we know it today.
[02:55.000 --> 03:22.000]  This was your lowdown for January 27, 2016.
[03:22.000 --> 03:43.000]  Let's go back to the year.
[03:43.000 --> 03:47.000]  A man had to answer for the wicked that he'd done
[03:47.000 --> 03:51.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree
[03:51.000 --> 03:56.000]  Round up all of them bad boys, hang a higher street
[03:56.000 --> 04:01.000]  For all the people to see
[04:01.000 --> 04:05.000]  That justice is one thing you should always find
[04:05.000 --> 04:09.000]  You gotta saddle up your boys, you gotta draw a hard line
[04:09.000 --> 04:13.000]  Turn the guns for the settles, we'll set a victory tune
[04:13.000 --> 04:17.000]  And we'll all meet back at the local school
[04:17.000 --> 04:22.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing
[04:22.000 --> 04:27.000]  Whiskey for my men, beer for my horses
[04:33.000 --> 04:37.000]  We got too many gangsters doing dirty deeds
[04:37.000 --> 04:42.000]  Alright folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show.
[04:42.000 --> 04:46.000]  It is February 15, 2015.
[04:46.000 --> 04:51.000]  President's Day, the day after Valentine's Day, no less, this year.
[04:51.000 --> 04:56.000]  And woke up off early this morning to go down and do some government-related business
[04:56.000 --> 05:01.000]  for which the government didn't show up for because they took the day off.
[05:01.000 --> 05:08.000]  And what really depresses me the most about any and all future President's Days,
[05:08.000 --> 05:13.000]  Obama will be mentioned in them. Oh well.
[05:13.000 --> 05:19.000]  Alright, for tonight, what I would like to start out with before we get into anything else,
[05:19.000 --> 05:24.000]  including taking calls and so on and so forth, so if you're on the board, hang on to the board.
[05:24.000 --> 05:28.000]  And don't drop off unless you want to call back in here in a little while,
[05:28.000 --> 05:33.000]  but I do have some stuff I need to go over before we begin, and I'm going to do that.
[05:33.000 --> 05:38.000]  Alright, part of what I went over in class yesterday,
[05:38.000 --> 05:43.000]  something that you need to understand about the situation here in Texas and what I'm trying to do about it.
[05:43.000 --> 05:49.000]  One of the things that I have relied on in my research for a very long time is the Texas Administrative Code.
[05:49.000 --> 05:54.000]  And if you've ever been doing anything like the kind of research it takes to do what I do
[05:54.000 --> 05:58.000]  and a lot of other people are doing that I talk to,
[05:58.000 --> 06:04.000]  one of the first places you need to look when you're researching the powers of any governmental agency
[06:04.000 --> 06:08.000]  is to see whether or not they exist in your state's administrative code.
[06:08.000 --> 06:18.000]  What you have to remember about that administrative code is that any agency listed there is a state administrative agency.
[06:18.000 --> 06:25.000]  That makes it absolutely unquestionable that they are an administrative agency
[06:25.000 --> 06:29.000]  if their duties are laid out in the administrative code.
[06:29.000 --> 06:36.000]  Now, in particular, the agency I'm referring to here is the Department of Public Safety of the State of Texas,
[06:36.000 --> 06:40.000]  the DPS, i.e. the state troopers.
[06:40.000 --> 06:48.000]  This also includes in Texas the Texas Rangers who are under the umbrella of the DPS.
[06:48.000 --> 06:56.000]  Now, what I'm going to read to you is four very straightforward rules out of the administrative code
[06:56.000 --> 07:07.000]  that tells us what the DPS is there for and what their legal duties are in relation to their agency.
[07:07.000 --> 07:11.000]  Now, the thing you need to understand about their mission and legal duty
[07:11.000 --> 07:19.000]  is that no government agency can go beyond the power given to them by law, okay?
[07:19.000 --> 07:25.000]  And the administrative code is the law by which these agencies are created and empowered.
[07:25.000 --> 07:34.000]  So if it limits their ability to act to those things by which the power is delegated in the administrative code,
[07:34.000 --> 07:41.000]  any regulatory code that they have outside of that must still act within it.
[07:41.000 --> 07:47.000]  It would be the same principle as what your government servants are supposed to do within the boundaries of the Constitution.
[07:47.000 --> 07:52.000]  Just because we delegated them certain powers within the Constitution,
[07:52.000 --> 07:59.000]  it does not give them the authority to go outside of those powers or outside of the Constitution
[07:59.000 --> 08:04.000]  or outside of the protections we afforded ourselves within it.
[08:04.000 --> 08:14.000]  And this is one of my big problems with BS like stare decisis and the way the attorneys have set up the justice system in this country.
[08:14.000 --> 08:19.000]  They have set it up completely backwards from how it should be.
[08:19.000 --> 08:28.000]  Instead of saying whether or not someone violates the law first, that is a secondary consideration.
[08:28.000 --> 08:35.000]  To me, the first consideration on any first impression of any law that's been made
[08:35.000 --> 08:41.000]  is that it must first be compared to the Constitutional provisions.
[08:41.000 --> 08:49.000]  First and foremost, does this law violate the Constitution anywhere in any way?
[08:49.000 --> 08:52.000]  If it is, it is automatically void.
[08:52.000 --> 09:00.000]  That should not be an issue that the injured party has to raise when it's being used against the people of the state
[09:00.000 --> 09:05.000]  because that was the task specifically given to the courts
[09:05.000 --> 09:12.000]  when they're supposed to be the checks and balances on the executive and the legislative for their actions.
[09:12.000 --> 09:23.000]  Why do we have to invoke the power that we already delegated and told them to use to protect us from this very thing?
[09:23.000 --> 09:31.000]  It's the reason why I disagree with that federal court justice who said that only a belligerent claimant has rights.
[09:31.000 --> 09:33.000]  Wrong.
[09:33.000 --> 09:46.000]  The whole reason we created a bill of rights and wrote it down was specifically to make sure our public servants understood those rights cannot be touched.
[09:46.000 --> 09:48.000]  We don't have to invoke them.
[09:48.000 --> 09:52.000]  We did that when we wrote them down and said, leave them alone.
[09:52.000 --> 09:55.000]  Those are ours, not yours.
[09:55.000 --> 09:57.000]  Hands off.
[09:57.000 --> 10:04.000]  Why should we constantly have to go into their three-ring circus and say, hey, you have to blow the whistle.
[10:04.000 --> 10:06.000]  Hey, you have to crack the whip.
[10:06.000 --> 10:08.000]  Hey, this act is what comes next.
[10:08.000 --> 10:17.000]  Hey, okay, you guys are supposed to be managing the circus, but it's supposed to be run and managed for our benefit, not yours.
[10:17.000 --> 10:21.000]  It's not there for you to manage and make a profit from.
[10:21.000 --> 10:29.000]  It's there for you to make sure that our individual rights and freedoms are protected.
[10:29.000 --> 10:34.000]  If you're doing it for any other reason, you're doing it wrong.
[10:34.000 --> 10:45.000]  Therefore, the first two things that any hearing relating to a law or a challenge to a law should consider, if you're being charged with a crime or
[10:45.000 --> 10:56.000]  a mal and prohibitum crime or anything of that sort, the court should first and foremost ask, does this law, the way it is written,
[10:56.000 --> 11:08.000]  either authorize a violation of the Bill of Rights or the Constitution, or does it directly create a violation of the Bill of Rights or the Constitution?
[11:08.000 --> 11:16.000]  And if it doesn't violate those, does it violate any other inherent right to which the people are entitled?
[11:16.000 --> 11:20.000]  And if it does, it's still unconstitutional.
[11:20.000 --> 11:26.000]  See, our rights are not limited by what's in the Bill of Rights.
[11:26.000 --> 11:29.000]  That's not the limit of the rights we have.
[11:29.000 --> 11:41.000]  That's exactly why every time some city attorney or some civil attorney makes the argument that this Constitution doesn't say the people can do that,
[11:41.000 --> 11:54.000]  I want to pin them down and slap them silly with a tire iron because our rights don't come from that Constitution.
[11:54.000 --> 12:01.000]  In fact, we have a clause in it that says just because we gave you these powers and this authority,
[12:01.000 --> 12:12.000]  that does not allow you to violate these rights or any other rights that we didn't put into the Constitution and say leave alone.
[12:12.000 --> 12:18.000]  How hard is that for even a simple-minded individual to contemplate and understand?
[12:18.000 --> 12:26.000]  Obviously, simple-minded is well above the majority count of most attorneys.
[12:26.000 --> 12:31.000]  If they can make that argument, they shouldn't be an attorney.
[12:31.000 --> 12:40.000]  They should be in a padded room drawn with crayons because it's very obvious they are a status psychopath.
[12:40.000 --> 12:49.000]  They shouldn't be allowed to live among normal people who know that they can do anything they want as long as they're not hurting anybody else.
[12:49.000 --> 12:54.000]  And they behave accordingly.
[12:54.000 --> 13:00.000]  Why do we let these morons say and do these things and get away with it?
[13:00.000 --> 13:04.000]  Oh, that's right because we're not Americans anymore.
[13:04.000 --> 13:08.000]  We haven't been Americans for a very long time.
[13:08.000 --> 13:18.000]  And so when we get down to what the duties of these individual agencies are supposed to be in relation to all of our rights and all the things that we do,
[13:18.000 --> 13:23.000]  the court is supposed to be saying, look, if this is what the law is, let's read it.
[13:23.000 --> 13:30.000]  Now, does anything in that wording create a violation of any fundamentally protected or inherent right?
[13:30.000 --> 13:32.000]  Okay, it's unconstitutional.
[13:32.000 --> 13:39.000]  No questions asked. It's unconstitutional because that's exactly what it does in some form or fashion.
[13:39.000 --> 13:48.000]  And if it doesn't violate an individual right, does it violate any provision of the Constitution on something you're not supposed to be able to do in the first place?
[13:48.000 --> 13:49.000]  Oh, what does that do?
[13:49.000 --> 13:52.000]  Okay, then it's definitely gone constitutional.
[13:52.000 --> 14:03.000]  Only when it gets past those two references should it even be considered as something that someone can violate.
[14:03.000 --> 14:16.000]  And the reason stare decisis should be thrown out the window is because every time the legislature changes the statutory scheme, the case law does not automatically change with it.
[14:16.000 --> 14:29.000]  They keep relying on case law that has long since been defeated by changes in the statute that it originally dealt with.
[14:29.000 --> 14:34.000]  But this is the system as it has been rigged, and it is rigged.
[14:34.000 --> 14:36.000]  There's no question that it's rigged.
[14:36.000 --> 14:39.000]  We know that it's rigged.
[14:39.000 --> 14:46.000]  And it's not in our favor, and it's not for the purpose of extending justice to the masses.
[14:46.000 --> 14:56.000]  It is there to extend justice to those that can pay for it or to enrich those who can use it to steal from the rest of us.
[14:56.000 --> 15:02.000]  That's what it's there for.
[15:02.000 --> 15:13.000]  But most people in the Patriot community, which I've termed as a separate community, the Patronut community, simply because they don't like how things are,
[15:13.000 --> 15:23.000]  they've decided to try to create their own version of reality and force those in the current system to adhere to their version.
[15:23.000 --> 15:29.000]  And that is not going to work, not on an individual basis.
[15:29.000 --> 15:37.000]  Now, if you've got the masses to stand up and bludgeon them all to death or arrest them and prosecute them and put them in jail,
[15:37.000 --> 15:43.000]  when they get out, maybe they'll conform to the way we actually wanted it to be.
[15:43.000 --> 15:50.000]  But in the meantime, until that happens, you are not going to change this on an individual basis.
[15:50.000 --> 15:57.000]  You're outnumbered, you're outgunned, you're outauthorized, so to speak.
[15:57.000 --> 15:58.000]  So what do we do?
[15:58.000 --> 16:03.000]  We have to become better educated, we have to become more willing to use that education,
[16:03.000 --> 16:11.000]  and we have to stop acting like we are afraid of our government and our public servants.
[16:11.000 --> 16:17.000]  We need to do exactly what the movie V said.
[16:17.000 --> 16:19.000]  V for Vendetta.
[16:19.000 --> 16:23.000]  Governments, the people should not be afraid of their governments.
[16:23.000 --> 16:25.000]  Governments should be afraid of their people.
[16:25.000 --> 16:29.000]  And that's exactly what America once was, and that's what it should be again.
[16:29.000 --> 16:34.000]  But whether or not we're going to get there, that's hard to say.
[16:34.000 --> 16:35.000]  All right.
[16:35.000 --> 16:40.000]  After we get back from this break, I'm going to continue on with what I originally planned on this rather than the rant that I'm on at the moment.
[16:40.000 --> 16:48.000]  But we'll get to that, and I'll try to get it wrapped up so that we can understand what the administrator's side of this means to us when we study it.
[16:48.000 --> 16:49.000]  All right, folks, you all hang in there.
[16:49.000 --> 16:51.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[16:51.000 --> 16:56.000]  The phones are currently off, so you can't call in yet, but I'll let you know when I'm going to turn them on.
[16:56.000 --> 17:21.000]  All right.
[17:21.000 --> 17:30.000]  All right, folks, I'm going to turn them on now.
[17:30.000 --> 17:52.000]  I'm going to turn them on now.
[17:52.000 --> 18:01.000]  I'm going to turn them on now.
[18:01.000 --> 18:23.000]  I'm going to turn them on now.
[18:23.000 --> 18:35.000]  I'm going to turn them on now.
[18:35.000 --> 18:58.000]  I'm going to turn them on now.
[18:58.000 --> 19:23.000]  I'm going to turn them on now.
[19:23.000 --> 19:46.000]  I'm going to turn them on now.
[19:46.000 --> 19:53.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:53.000 --> 20:16.000]  All right, folks, I'm going to turn them on now.
[20:16.000 --> 20:30.000]  All right, folks, I'm going to turn them on now.
[20:30.000 --> 20:57.000]  All right, folks, I'm going to turn them on now.
[20:57.000 --> 21:07.000]  The Department of Public Safety in all of these chapters on enforcement is the only entity given direct enforcement power in the Transportation Code itself.
[21:07.000 --> 21:21.000]  We know this because after the definition of the department, throughout the chapters, it says the department shall, the department may, the department has the authority to, and so on and so forth.
[21:21.000 --> 21:33.000]  When it gets into subtitle C, Rules of the Road, it changes tactics just a little bit. It creates two other definitions that it doesn't actually define in a specific way.
[21:33.000 --> 21:56.000]  One of them is in 543.001 where it switches from department to peace officer. And then in 541 definitions, it defines the term police officer. And police officer there is defined as the term any officer authorized to enforce transportation statutes and make arrest under transportation statutes.
[21:56.000 --> 22:08.000]  So right there, it tells us that the police officer has to be authorized somewhere by someone to enforce that code.
[22:08.000 --> 22:16.000]  Now, the thing about it is the only entity specifically named as having that authority is the Department of Public Safety.
[22:16.000 --> 22:30.000]  Up in 543, it says any peace officer may arrest without warrant any person found committing a violation of this subtitle. Well, using that word any and the term peace officer,
[22:30.000 --> 22:44.000]  it gives the appearance that it means any one of the peace officers listed in 2.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, which is basically every agency of law enforcement, even game wardens.
[22:44.000 --> 23:03.000]  But if you do a search through the transportation code for 2.12 Code of Criminal Procedure, you will find that where the legislature intended that peace officer mean the same thing that it does in 2.12,
[23:03.000 --> 23:21.000]  it specifically defines it as having the same meaning as peace officer in 2.12. That does not appear in the definition in the enforcement sections relating to subtitle C offenses under rules of the road,
[23:21.000 --> 23:39.000]  which are all the moving violations and the inspection violation. Okay? So peace officer under 543 for the purpose of enforcement doesn't mean the same thing as it does in the sections where it specifically says
[23:39.000 --> 23:54.000]  peace officer have the same meaning as it does under 2.12. Why do I argue this? I argue it for two reasons. One, there is a separate definition for police officer specifically stating that that person has to be someone
[23:54.000 --> 24:13.000]  authorized to enforce that statute. Two, the only law enforcement entity that is in the list of peace officers under 2.12 that is given enforcement powers in those chapters of the transportation code
[24:13.000 --> 24:29.000]  are those peace officers in the Department of Public Safety. It doesn't mention any other law enforcement entity, only the Department of Public Safety. So my argument is that peace officer in 543 doesn't mean any agency,
[24:29.000 --> 24:54.000]  it means any DPS officer or police officer that was authorized down in the definition of police officer under 541. So given that, sorry folks, okay, given that the DPS is the only peace officer
[24:54.000 --> 25:12.000]  authorized directly in the transportation code to enforce it. Which brings us to the administrative code where the DPS is defined as having authority to do what the transportation code itself is telling them to do.
[25:12.000 --> 25:26.000]  So you have to understand that the administrative code is the original policies and procedures manual for the Department of Public Safety and the transportation code is their regulatory interpretation not only of their duties
[25:26.000 --> 25:39.000]  under the administrative code but under what was created in SB 971 as a recodified transportation code. So they are interlinked.
[25:39.000 --> 25:54.000]  So given that, let's first look at under Title 37, Part 1, Chapter 1, Subchapter A of the administrative code and look at Rule 1.2. What is the mission of the Texas Department of Public Safety?
[25:54.000 --> 26:10.000]  One, to supervise traffic on rural highways. Supervise is doing nothing more than directing traffic. Hey, go that way, we have a detour set up because the bridge is out, an accident's ahead, there's a tree down in the road.
[26:10.000 --> 26:32.000]  Anything except regulate. It is supervise, redirect traffic, whatever. Okay? Number 2, to supervise and regulate commercial and for hire traffic. You get the regulate part?
[26:32.000 --> 26:45.000]  Regulate comes down to licensing, registration, proof of financial responsibility, inspection, all that good stuff that they're trying to say everybody has to have.
[26:45.000 --> 26:59.000]  Right here specifically says that their duty is to supervise and regulate commercial and for hire traffic. That is not you and I.
[26:59.000 --> 27:21.000]  Number 4 of 1.2, to administer regulatory programs. Remember, regulate commercial and for hire traffic, regulatory programs in driver's licensing, motor vehicle inspection, and safety responsibility.
[27:21.000 --> 27:34.000]  Okay? Then number 5, to execute programs. Once again, regulatory programs. Once again, regulate commercial and for hire traffic.
[27:34.000 --> 27:53.000]  To execute programs supplementing and supporting the preceding activities. Driver's licensing, motor vehicle inspection, and safety responsibility are the regulatory programs used to regulate commercial and for hire traffic.
[27:53.000 --> 28:08.000]  See how that ties up in a nice neat little hierarchical package right there? Okay? So, then we move on into Rule 1.3 of the Administrative Code.
[28:08.000 --> 28:26.000]  Subsection A of Rule 1.3, the programs of the Department of Public Safety fall into three general classes. One, traffic or street and highway traffic management, supervision management.
[28:26.000 --> 28:47.000]  Okay? More or less the same deal. Two, crime suppression and control. And three, emergency management. All right? And this is talking about the programs, which is the three we talked about up there, the licensing, the inspection, and the safety responsibility.
[28:47.000 --> 29:02.000]  Okay? These are the three general classes those three programs fall into. B, the three major classes of functional departmental programs within the department are as follows.
[29:02.000 --> 29:24.000]  One, police law enforcement function. You got it? Police law enforcement function. There's that word police. Go back to 541 of the Transportation Code. Police officer, one who is authorized to arrest and enforce the Transportation Code.
[29:24.000 --> 29:38.000]  Every part of the code where enforcement is done, the department means the Department of Public Safety. Right here is our direct tie-in to that definition of police officer.
[29:38.000 --> 29:52.000]  Okay? This is also going to be our direct tie-in to that peace officer definition until we get down to Rule 4.13, which we'll get to not in this one, but we'll get to it next time if possible.
[29:52.000 --> 30:01.000]  All right. We're about to take another break. We'll be right back after this, so y'all please hang in there.
[30:01.000 --> 30:15.000]  Burglars are breaking into hotel rooms by effortlessly and silently opening those key card locks. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you how the hackers do it and what it means for you, the traveler, in a moment.
[30:15.000 --> 30:25.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.000 --> 30:44.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.000 --> 30:55.000]  When Janet Wolfe returned to her room at the Hyatt in Houston and found her laptop stolen, there was no sign of forced entry, and the housekeeper was ruled out as a suspect. So who done it?
[30:55.000 --> 31:03.000]  A hacker, it turns out, using a digital tool that spooks the computerized key card locks in place at four million hotel rooms.
[31:03.000 --> 31:18.000]  After break-ins across Texas, the lock company, Onity, offered a pretty lame solution, plugging the locks with putty. The real solution requires replacing every lock's circuit board, something Onity wants the hotels to pay for. But what if they don't?
[31:18.000 --> 31:31.000]  Well, it may be time to stay somewhere else. Motel 6, anyone? I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.000 --> 31:38.000]  What are you thinking? Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month.
[31:38.000 --> 31:49.000]  Infusa.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever.
[31:49.000 --> 31:58.000]  It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products that saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367.
[31:58.000 --> 32:02.000]  Only at infusa.org.
[32:28.000 --> 32:36.000]  In conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:51.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Line, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 33:02.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.000 --> 33:12.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:12.000 --> 33:28.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm gonna solve them, through the help of government them, prosecute them. Okay.
[33:28.000 --> 33:42.000]  Oh, sir.
[33:42.000 --> 33:58.000]  Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me prosecute them wicked leader. Yeah, you see, them murderers are liars, them tellers, them are liars, not tell sweet stories. They don't believe me, say what they tell me. 3% of Americans vote for Bush.
[33:58.000 --> 34:03.000]  So how the hell he get the presidency? That's why we have a warrant for him.
[34:03.000 --> 34:16.000]  Everybody listen carefully, listen to the word where the issues proceed.
[34:16.000 --> 34:23.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. All right, back on to where we were here.
[34:23.000 --> 34:38.000]  Now, again, three major classes of functional departmental programs within the department. And again, department means Department of Public Safety are as follows, police law enforcement, which is our tie in back into the definition of police soft surrender 541.
[34:38.000 --> 35:01.000]  All right, subsection A, Highway Patrol Service. Now remember, this is the law enforcement function. Highway Patrol Service, Drivers License Service, Vehicle Inspection Service, License and Weight Service.
[35:01.000 --> 35:20.000]  All of these tie into those three regulatory programs listed as regulating commercial and for hire traffic. Not you and me, commercial and for hire traffic. Not everybody, just a commercial and for hire traffic.
[35:20.000 --> 35:35.000]  And in H, Motor Vehicle Theft Service. Now, number two, administrative and regulatory function. A, Drivers License Service, Primary Responsibility.
[35:35.000 --> 35:48.000]  Okay, DPS's primary responsibility is the driver's license service. So you would think that they would understand who is supposed to have one and who is not required to have one.
[35:48.000 --> 35:59.000]  But it is those that are in the commercial and for hire capacities under which this regulatory program is authorized to operate.
[35:59.000 --> 36:09.000]  B, Vehicle Inspection Service. Again, parameter vehicle emission and vehicle idle emission inspection and maintenance primary responsibility.
[36:09.000 --> 36:23.000]  So once again, something that is commercial and for hire. Commercial and for hire. It's ridiculous that they don't understand this, but who's read it besides me is my question.
[36:23.000 --> 36:50.000]  C, Motorcycle Operator Training and All-Terrain Vehicle Certification. So instead of worrying about the definition of motorcycle in the transportation code, look here at this and see that the administrative and regulatory function relating to Motorcycle Operator Training and All-Terrain Vehicle Certification ties into commercial and for hire traffic.
[36:50.000 --> 37:00.000]  Can't tie into anything else. They're not authorized to tie it into anything else.
[37:00.000 --> 37:11.000]  But let's continue on. Now after we get done with 1.3, let's look at rule 1.11.
[37:11.000 --> 37:28.000]  This is the basic doctrines portion of the administrative code. In other words, this is the beginning of the base policy, the departmental agency policy of the Department of Public Safety.
[37:28.000 --> 37:46.000]  And I'm only going to read you the sections in pertinent part here. But under rule 1.11, subsection C, the department recognizes that government exists for the benefit of the governed, the people.
[37:46.000 --> 38:12.000]  Now this is the same department that falsely accused and arrested Sandra Bland who was not operating in commercial or for hire traffic. This is the same department that is conducting roadside body cavity searches of women illegally and unconstitutionally who are not part of commercial and for hire traffic.
[38:12.000 --> 38:24.000]  D, it is a solemn obligation of members of the department to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the state of Texas.
[38:24.000 --> 38:40.000]  And it includes as well as to enforce the statutory enactments. And then it follows that up with constitutional provisions take precedence over statutory enactments.
[38:40.000 --> 38:53.000]  Get that? Constitutional provisions take precedence over statutory enactments. How many times do you hear these morons, I don't care what the Constitution says, the law says.
[38:53.000 --> 39:07.000]  No, it doesn't. Not only does the law not say what you obviously think it says, it doesn't matter what it says if it conflicts with the Constitution. You moron.
[39:07.000 --> 39:23.000]  Again, indeed, in the enforcement of the provisions of a statute, personnel of the Department of Public Safety will refrain from infringing upon any rights or privileges guaranteed by the Constitution.
[39:23.000 --> 39:35.000]  Did it look like that little pea-brained moron that took Sandra Bland to jail was even beginning to follow departmental policy in what he did?
[39:35.000 --> 39:45.000]  Does it look like those two idiots that conducted the roadside body cavity searches complied with any of this departmental policy?
[39:45.000 --> 39:57.000]  See, that's the thing. When you see a police agency like the Department of Public Safety say that our officers acted within policy, which policy are we talking about?
[39:57.000 --> 40:07.000]  The one you wrote after the fact or beginning with this one? And let me tell you why that's important. Let's read F.
[40:07.000 --> 40:18.000]  It is the policy of the department to assume primary responsibility for traffic supervision on the rural highways of this state, including the regulation of commercial traffic.
[40:18.000 --> 40:28.000]  Again, we have commercial tie-in, but that's not the best part. The best part is when we go down to rule 1.111.
[40:28.000 --> 40:34.000]  And here is what it says, top 10 general orders.
[40:34.000 --> 40:45.000]  The 10 general orders listed in this section are the traditional code of conduct for the Texas Department of Public Safety, meaning the department,
[40:45.000 --> 40:54.000]  and are binding in addition to other codes of ethics adopted. You get that?
[40:54.000 --> 41:06.000]  Everything listed here that I've been reading to you is the base policy. Everything they wrote after that has to be added to this policy.
[41:06.000 --> 41:18.000]  It doesn't operate in despite or independent of or anything else. It has to be done in compliance with this base policy, and it's not.
[41:18.000 --> 41:32.000]  Let's look at number four of rule 1.111, to know and obey at all times the U.S. and state constitutions.
[41:32.000 --> 41:38.000]  And after that, it says federal and state laws and lawful orders and instructions.
[41:38.000 --> 41:47.000]  So the constitutional compliance is their highest priority if we take the way they're listed here as the priority.
[41:47.000 --> 41:59.000]  And based upon what we read in the previous rule, that is a correct reading because it says it supersedes the things that follow in this list right here.
[41:59.000 --> 42:16.000]  So this shouldn't be difficult, not even for an eighth grade education, much less somebody that is supposed to be as well educated as a DPS officer, supposedly.
[42:16.000 --> 42:27.000]  But the problem here, folks, is we are not dealing with a lack of education, at least not entirely.
[42:27.000 --> 42:34.000]  We are dealing with a completely different mentality of entitlement.
[42:34.000 --> 42:47.000]  Now, you've got your welfare recipients that get food stamps and WIC and all this other kind of stuff with absolutely no effort of any kind on a regular basis who may or may not deserve it.
[42:47.000 --> 43:04.000]  But you put a badge and a uniform on somebody and tell them they're now authorized to kill people, and you are talking about a level of entitlement like none you will ever see.
[43:04.000 --> 43:18.000]  And it seems like we are entrusting that power to people that are wholly undeserving of wielding it.
[43:18.000 --> 43:29.000]  And I don't care if it's because of a lack of mental evaluation, lack of education, a lack of competency in any other way possible.
[43:29.000 --> 43:37.000]  There are too many people whose ego dictates their authority.
[43:37.000 --> 43:49.000]  Not reason, not logic, not the law, their ego and their sense of entitlement in having that ego stroked.
[43:49.000 --> 43:56.000]  And I've got a problem with that, and I'm hoping that with all this exposure, you folks are getting a problem with that, but time will tell.
[43:56.000 --> 44:00.000]  We'll be right back after the break. I'm going to turn the phones on.
[44:00.000 --> 44:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.000 --> 44:15.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:01.000]  Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:12.000]  Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from Nature'sTruerorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D.
[45:12.000 --> 45:19.000]  here in Austin, Texas, hiring brave new books and chase things to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:31.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:44.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at Nature'sTruerorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, Nature'sTruerorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:48.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.000 --> 45:51.000]  Nature'sTruerorganics.com.
[46:18.000 --> 46:31.000]  All right, folks, we are back. The phones are now on 512-646-1984 as the call-in number.
[46:31.000 --> 46:34.000]  We're going to go ahead and start taking your calls.
[46:34.000 --> 46:44.000]  Be aware, my call screener can't seem to get in tonight to do any call screening, so I'm going to have to just wing this as far as how I call you out,
[46:44.000 --> 46:48.000]  because your name isn't always up here, where you are isn't always up here.
[46:48.000 --> 46:52.000]  The only thing I can see correctly is your phone number.
[46:52.000 --> 47:00.000]  So if you're listening, make sure if I don't have a name or a place and I call out a number, make sure it's yours.
[47:00.000 --> 47:05.000]  All right, Seattle, Washington, area code 206. Hello?
[47:05.000 --> 47:07.000]  Yes, it's Charles White.
[47:07.000 --> 47:08.000]  Hi, Charles, how are you?
[47:08.000 --> 47:14.000]  I'm fine. I love you, Sean. I'm really grateful to you. I have a quick question. I know there's a lot of people waiting.
[47:14.000 --> 47:24.000]  I got a ticket for no insurance at the time I rolled back onto a person's vehicle on an on-ramp to the freeway.
[47:24.000 --> 47:29.000]  The officer was not called. We told him that we had already swapped information.
[47:29.000 --> 47:38.000]  He said, okay, he left. He walked back. Who was the gentleman whose car I hit? But as I talked to him, proceeded to leave to his car,
[47:38.000 --> 47:46.000]  came back with the ticket for some kind of rear, back it up in proper and no insurance.
[47:46.000 --> 47:56.000]  My question to you is, since the Constitution, I want to say it right, because I damaged his car,
[47:56.000 --> 48:01.000]  which was no more than a thousand bucks, do they have any jurisdiction to take me to court?
[48:01.000 --> 48:11.000]  Because they sent me a subpoena and they requested this gentleman out of the state to show up to testify for them.
[48:11.000 --> 48:20.000]  And so I'm trying to figure out if they have a jurisdiction case over me.
[48:20.000 --> 48:28.000]  Well, the issue here is this. What does Washington law say about the type of offense?
[48:28.000 --> 48:35.000]  If it's an infraction, then it's civil. And the state has no authority in this.
[48:35.000 --> 48:40.000]  It's a civil matter between you and the gentleman whose property was damaged, not the state.
[48:40.000 --> 48:46.000]  If it's criminal, that's another issue, but that would depend.
[48:46.000 --> 48:56.000]  The thing here is, is in most states, an officer can't issue the citation if he didn't witness the act himself.
[48:56.000 --> 48:59.000]  It has to be done in his presence or view.
[48:59.000 --> 49:07.000]  You need to see what the law is in relation to that up in Washington, assuming this occurred in Washington.
[49:07.000 --> 49:13.000]  Yes, because I was going to try to suppress the officer because he wasn't there, and I've done that before in previous times.
[49:13.000 --> 49:18.000]  Well, the thing is, that's why they have to have this other guy come back and testify against you.
[49:18.000 --> 49:24.000]  The officer can't do it. If they try to do it without the guy whose car you actually hit,
[49:24.000 --> 49:29.000]  then you need to challenge it and demand dismissal for lack of evidence and a witness.
[49:29.000 --> 49:34.000]  The officer can't testify to anything because that would be hearsay.
[49:34.000 --> 49:43.000]  Correct. Now, I got a paper from Mark Stevens, something about financial responsibility, that we don't have to have insurance.
[49:43.000 --> 49:45.000]  I've heard you say that same thing.
[49:45.000 --> 49:49.000]  I just started looking at your YouTube videos, and I love it.
[49:49.000 --> 49:52.000]  My son is going through quite a bit of a problem as well.
[49:52.000 --> 50:00.000]  I've got to go to court today, and I don't have any paperwork to submit to try to get this stuff dismissed
[50:00.000 --> 50:06.000]  because it's been wrong to talk to other people. You're the first of all the people I've seen on YouTube that I've been able to contact, which is the bank.
[50:06.000 --> 50:12.000]  Well, the thing about it is, what are they going to do in court on Thursday?
[50:12.000 --> 50:20.000]  That's what I don't know. They requested me to come in because before I didn't get in, what they did, they wouldn't pick it,
[50:20.000 --> 50:26.000]  and then they dismissed the ticket, and then Washington can come back here later for the same ticket or the charges.
[50:26.000 --> 50:30.000]  So this is what they did to me. They dismissed the ticket. I missed the court date.
[50:30.000 --> 50:34.000]  Then they had me as a no-show, but the only thing I got from the process...
[50:34.000 --> 50:37.000]  Well, wait. What did you get that said they dismissed the ticket?
[50:37.000 --> 50:43.000]  Well, it was on the ticket, actually, that the officer gave me.
[50:43.000 --> 50:51.000]  The German court clerk showed me that there was no court date, and that was dismissed because it said, right on the ticket, it says ticket void.
[50:51.000 --> 50:58.000]  And the lawyers here said that was to my benefit, but then they said the state could come back and refile it,
[50:58.000 --> 51:04.000]  which is a prosecutor, to refile the charge, which is what they did, this time adding a no insurance with it.
[51:04.000 --> 51:14.000]  Okay. That doesn't answer my question. The fact that they don't necessarily have to dismiss a pending charge
[51:14.000 --> 51:21.000]  in order to add another charge from the same event. So I'm confused in why they would have dismissed it in the first place.
[51:21.000 --> 51:27.000]  Then the second problem is, what was given to you that showed it was dismissed?
[51:27.000 --> 51:32.000]  Well, they didn't send me anything until I inquired about the court date.
[51:32.000 --> 51:42.000]  Okay. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Having no court date written on it, unless the law says that's a reason that the ticket would be void,
[51:42.000 --> 51:50.000]  isn't the answer to my question either. If someone specifically told you that the ticket was dismissed,
[51:50.000 --> 51:57.000]  then they should have been able to provide you with something in writing that showed that.
[51:57.000 --> 52:02.000]  Well, you know, on a docket piece of paper that I went and I took to the lawyer, it did show that that ticket-
[52:02.000 --> 52:10.000]  Okay. It doesn't matter whether it's listed on the docket. The docket is not what controls whether or not a charge is dismissed.
[52:10.000 --> 52:16.000]  The docket is the schedule of the court. Correct. Okay. That's all it is.
[52:16.000 --> 52:23.000]  Okay. So the only thing they showed was void across the ticket that I was given, and then they told me-
[52:23.000 --> 52:31.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa. What copy of the ticket? The one in their possession said void, or the one that was given to you by the cop said void?
[52:31.000 --> 52:35.000]  The one that was given to me by the cop, they had-
[52:35.000 --> 52:42.000]  Why would the cop write you a ticket and then turn around and write void on it before he gave it to you?
[52:42.000 --> 52:51.000]  Exactly. And I thought it was done because maybe he didn't do it timely for me because he didn't have a week to do it here in Seattle.
[52:51.000 --> 52:56.000]  And for whatever lack of reason, he failed, and that's the only way I could think he would void it out.
[52:56.000 --> 53:04.000]  There was a question necessary on the ticket needed because he wrote the ticket for backing up into an individual and no insurance.
[53:04.000 --> 53:12.000]  And I asked him that, and he's telling me that it was to my favor that that ticket was voided out, and I could have sworn he said-
[53:12.000 --> 53:22.000]  Okay. Wait, wait, wait. Let me ask you this question. Did the officer have any of your information before you gave him whatever he used to write this ticket?
[53:22.000 --> 53:24.000]  Say that one more time for me.
[53:24.000 --> 53:32.000]  Did the officer have any of your personal information before he wrote you this ticket?
[53:32.000 --> 53:39.000]  Did he come up and demand that you give him your license and other information so he could write the ticket?
[53:39.000 --> 53:46.000]  Yes. And since I've heard your tickets, I know not to do that, but at that time he asked me to have a license.
[53:46.000 --> 53:53.000]  I presented him the license. He asked me to have an insurance, and I turned around and had my insurance on his dick because I'd just punched him.
[53:53.000 --> 53:54.000]  Okay.
[53:54.000 --> 54:02.000]  And then he left because we told him we'd always exchange information. We was good. So as soon as he left, we were okay.
[54:02.000 --> 54:09.000]  The guy was just taking out my last number, and we was going to take off. And then the officer, like I said, came back, put him to the side, talked to him.
[54:09.000 --> 54:12.000]  And next day I know he walks away, comes back, gives me a ticket.
[54:12.000 --> 54:18.000]  Well, I'll tell you my guess as to why this was done. Okay?
[54:18.000 --> 54:19.000]  Okay.
[54:19.000 --> 54:25.000]  You are out of state or the other guy's out of state, right?
[54:25.000 --> 54:31.000]  Everyone was both Washington State. He was living 30 miles farther north of Seattle.
[54:31.000 --> 54:35.000]  Okay. So you're both from within Washington, but not the same area?
[54:35.000 --> 54:36.000]  Yes.
[54:36.000 --> 54:37.000]  Okay.
[54:37.000 --> 54:46.000]  Well, because he was out of a different jurisdiction, they were subpoenaing him, and that's what it says on the subpoena because he was out of the jurisdiction, out of the county.
[54:46.000 --> 54:51.000]  They had to do a special subpoena to get him in that the court allowed him to do, to prosecute.
[54:51.000 --> 54:56.000]  Yeah. And that trial hasn't happened yet, though, right?
[54:56.000 --> 55:00.000]  No. And I supposed to go to court on this Thursday.
[55:00.000 --> 55:10.000]  And you think that's what's going to happen in court on Thursday, is he's going to be there on Thursday to testify against you so this is going to be an actual trial?
[55:10.000 --> 55:13.000]  I'm hoping he doesn't, but that's what it's supposed to be about.
[55:13.000 --> 55:19.000]  Okay. Well, I asked you that earlier on, what was the purpose of going on Thursday, and you said you didn't know.
[55:19.000 --> 55:24.000]  See, I need to know this information or I can't give you good information.
[55:24.000 --> 55:31.000]  Your phone sort of come in and out, but I misunderstood, but yeah, that's what the purpose of the court is supposed to be on Thursday.
[55:31.000 --> 55:42.000]  Okay. If the guy shows up, then he's the one that's going to get up on the stand, but you're kind of stuck at the moment.
[55:42.000 --> 55:48.000]  The difference here is whether or not the state's going after you for his benefit or for its own.
[55:48.000 --> 55:51.000]  The state doesn't have a dog in this fight if it's civil.
[55:51.000 --> 55:57.000]  They don't have a dog in this fight even if it's criminal because the officer wasn't there to witness it.
[55:57.000 --> 55:58.000]  Correct.
[55:58.000 --> 56:10.000]  Okay. So what you have to figure out is, one, what are the rules of evidence, and two, what does it say about officer's authority to issue citations up in Seattle?
[56:10.000 --> 56:16.000]  Now, see, in Washington, everything up there is supposed to be in fractions and it's supposed to be civil,
[56:16.000 --> 56:25.000]  which means the state has no authority to be pulling you into court for anything unless they can prove you broke some sort of agreement with them.
[56:25.000 --> 56:29.000]  And that's what I thought. Listen to your tape. I'm watching Stephen's tapes.
[56:29.000 --> 56:34.000]  That's what it felt like. They had no tradition. I'm not supposed to get no tickets by them. I would like to travel.
[56:34.000 --> 56:39.000]  Wait, wait, wait. Wrong argument, wrong basis. Don't go off on tangents here.
[56:39.000 --> 56:43.000]  Okay.
[56:43.000 --> 56:49.000]  No, you're understanding properly, but you're not understanding the proper argument at the proper time.
[56:49.000 --> 56:55.000]  A truck driver has the right to travel except for when he's being a truck driver.
[56:55.000 --> 56:59.000]  Okay.
[56:59.000 --> 57:12.000]  All right. So when they charge you with a commercial offense under a code like that, then they're accusing you of being a truck driver and acting like one without proper consideration.
[57:12.000 --> 57:16.000]  That's what they're doing. So right to travel is irrelevant.
[57:16.000 --> 57:22.000]  It means nothing because you're not being accused of violating anything relating to the right to travel.
[57:22.000 --> 57:27.000]  You're accused of violating your agreement as a truck driver.
[57:27.000 --> 57:30.000]  The rules of a truck driver can't.
[57:30.000 --> 57:31.000]  Okay.
[57:31.000 --> 57:32.000]  I got you.
[57:32.000 --> 57:38.000]  That's the best way to describe it to you. That's what they're operating on the presumption of.
[57:38.000 --> 57:40.000]  The rules of a truck driver.
[57:40.000 --> 57:47.000]  Well, the rules of commerce, that you are acting in a commercial capacity like a truck driver does.
[57:47.000 --> 57:50.000]  And I understood that when you said it because I needed you to teach them to know.
[57:50.000 --> 57:56.000]  So by arguing when I go get this deceased, am I able to bring up any dismissal evidence based upon that?
[57:56.000 --> 57:59.000]  You can move for a dismissal. The state lacks standing.
[57:59.000 --> 58:03.000]  The state has no dog in this fight whatsoever.
[58:03.000 --> 58:08.000]  The officer didn't witness anything. The officer can't testify to anything.
[58:08.000 --> 58:12.000]  The officer can't claim an injury. Neither can the state.
[58:12.000 --> 58:17.000]  The only people this is between is you and the guy they call.
[58:17.000 --> 58:20.000]  Exactly. That was going to be my argument.
[58:20.000 --> 58:27.000]  Just move to dismiss it and move to suppress anything the officer would get up there to say and do.
[58:27.000 --> 58:32.000]  That's what I'm going to do. I don't know if I need to be suspended or not.
[58:32.000 --> 58:37.000]  Well, you need to do everything in writing, so you've got to file motions for that. Okay?
[58:37.000 --> 58:38.000]  Yes.
[58:38.000 --> 58:39.000]  All right. Anything else?
[58:39.000 --> 58:41.000]  No. Yes.
[58:41.000 --> 58:43.000]  Okay. Well, hang on and I'll get you after this break.
[58:43.000 --> 58:50.000]  All right, folks. 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[59:13.000 --> 59:15.000]  We'll be right back.
[59:43.000 --> 59:46.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:00:13.000 --> 01:00:23.000]  Updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:29.000]  Markets for Wednesday, the 27th of January, 2016 opened up with gold at $1,120 an ounce,
[01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:44.000]  silver $14.48 an ounce, Texas crude $31.45 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 395 U.S. currency.
[01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  Today in history, Thursday, January 27th, 1825, the U.S. Congress approves Indian territory in what is present-day Oklahoma.
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:01:01.000]  This cleared the way for the forced relocation of Eastern Indians, known as the Trail of Tears.
[01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:08.000]  In recent news, the Vatican announced over the weekend that Pope Francis will be visiting Sweden later this year to mark the 500th anniversary
[01:01:08.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  of Martin Luther's writing and posting of the 95 Theses on the front doors of All Saints Church in Wittenberg, Germany, October 31st, 1517.
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:23.000]  Amongst other points, Luther primarily wrote argumentations against the Roman Catholic theology of indulgences,
[01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  essentially the selling of forgiveness from temporal punishment, from sins for money, a practice still upheld by the church.
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  On October 31st of this year, Francis is set to be at the southern Swedish city of Lund, where the Lutheran World Federation was founded in 1947.
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:45.000]  While his predecessors have visited Protestant churches, Francis has come under criticism from traditionalists and conservatives within the church
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:49.000]  who accuse him of sending conflicting signals about interfaith relations.
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:56.000]  Catholic traditionalists have accused Francis of making too many concessions to Lutherans, since both religions will be using Luther's common prayer
[01:01:56.000 --> 01:02:01.000]  during the 2017 Reformation commemoration services being held jointly between the two churches,
[01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  which they say excessively praised Luther, who was historically condemned as a heretic and excommunicated.
[01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:14.000]  Pope Francis made ecumenism one of the main themes of his papacy, considering he has already visited the Lutheran Church of Rome,
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:19.000]  the Waldensian Protestant community in northern Italy, Rome's Jewish synagogue,
[01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  and is soon due to become the first pope to visit Rome's mosque later this year.
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:36.000]  Marvin Minsky, a pioneer in the field of artificial intelligence at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, died Sunday at the age of 88.
[01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:40.000]  Minsky viewed the brain as a machine whose function can be studied and replicated in the computer,
[01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:45.000]  and he considered how machines might be endowed with common sense or artificial intelligence.
[01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  Daniela Russ, director of MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory,
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  said that Minsky helped create the vision of artificial intelligence as we know it today.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  This is your lowdown for January 27, 2016.
[01:03:00.000 --> 01:03:10.000]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty
[01:03:10.000 --> 01:03:18.000]  I read his book and it says he cares not for the unsightly
[01:03:18.000 --> 01:03:25.000]  These warm others come by that term rightly
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:31.000]  I won't pay for the war with my body
[01:03:31.000 --> 01:03:35.000]  Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money
[01:03:35.000 --> 01:03:38.000]  I won't pay for the fun with my body
[01:03:38.000 --> 01:03:41.000]  The plans wicked and the logic shoddy
[01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:45.000]  Ain't gonna pay for the war with my body
[01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:48.000]  I won't pay for the boys with my money
[01:03:48.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  Ain't gonna pay for the kids with my body
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:56.000]  The whole agenda smells funny
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:31.000]  He has no license, but they didn't charge him for the no license in a third degree.
[01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  He's concerned about his course of action on how to protest that.
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:40.000]  But there's no video. He wasn't eluding.
[01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:44.000]  He was just driving on the street one o'clock in the morning with no people.
[01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  So is there any way he can use any of the judicial rules that would apply?
[01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:59.000]  Well, the issue here is in a criminal case, it works differently than it does in the civil infraction case.
[01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:07.000]  The thing is, is what are they going to use as evidence against him to allege reckless driving?
[01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:12.000]  Well, the gentleman that was the officer is no longer there with him.
[01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:15.000]  That's not my question. Answer the question I asked you.
[01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  What are they going to use against him as evidence at trial?
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  Well, the only thing they have so far is just his officer's statement as to what occurred.
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  And I heard the officer's statement and there was nothing in there as to where he was driving.
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:34.000]  They just charged him with reckless driving, which was crazy to me.
[01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  There's nothing in the officer's police report that says anything about reckless driving.
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  In his report, that's what he thought was reckless driving.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  And that was it. He gave a description of hearing his car make a noise because he has these racing pipes on his challenger.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:58.000]  And he wasn't the officer that had pulled him over.
[01:05:58.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  It was another officer that claimed he heard his car. And then when they was looking around for this car with those doors,
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  they said that they saw him on another road and proceeded to pull him over and start asking questions.
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  Okay. But what did they see that constitutes reckless driving?
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:23.000]  What is in the statement that they say they saw him do that constitutes reckless driving?
[01:06:23.000 --> 01:06:28.000]  Well, first of all, they said they saw him run a red light, which he didn't.
[01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  And he swore he didn't and his witnesses swore he didn't.
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:34.000]  And the second thing was that he had made a right turn.
[01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:36.000]  Well, now wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute.
[01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:39.000]  We have conflicting statements here.
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:47.000]  How can they say they were looking around for a car that they didn't know had made a noise they couldn't identify or anything else
[01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:51.000]  and then suddenly they see him run a red light at the same time?
[01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  That's what they were saying. And I told them I said that's crazy.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:59.000]  So they asked for a video that they were supposed to have. They can't produce it.
[01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:04.000]  And he said, well, I didn't run a red light. And when he had made the right turn,
[01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:12.000]  there was another officer that was beginning to follow him some distance back from what I recall hearing and they didn't find him.
[01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  And then I guess it was another officer in the street.
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  And they proceeded to pull him over at an inn where he had pulled off the road.
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:21.000]  And he said he was about to get out of his car.
[01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:26.000]  And they happened to see the car and pulled him over and asked him for his license.
[01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:32.000]  And when they didn't even present that, they waited, came back, took him to jail because they didn't have a license.
[01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  And then they proceeded to charge him with reckless driving, which they didn't fingerprint him until they let him out eight hours later.
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  That was it.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:58.000]  Okay. It sounds to me more like he was profiled based upon what I can tell at the moment, either because of the type of car or because of him personally.
[01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:02.000]  Hard to say which. Being Seattle, I would say both.
[01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:07.000]  He was profiled. And this was the third time he just got stopped again last night for the same thing.
[01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:13.000]  His lights was dim and they pulled him over. And he told him, are you pulling me over?
[01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  He said, you have a light that's out. And he checked it was actually on.
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:19.000]  And they took him to jail because he had no license.
[01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:24.000]  I brought him out three times in the last two weeks.
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  Well, it sounds like he's being harassed is what it sounds like because they already know the car and they know he doesn't have a license.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  That's what it sounds like.
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:33.000]  Yeah.
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:37.000]  Okay. So somebody is going to have to sue the cops.
[01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  That's what's going to have to happen.
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:45.000]  You're going to have to sue and get an injunction against them from pulling you over.
[01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:49.000]  Injunction. And that's what I told him. I said, you got to listen to the judge.
[01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  He gave me your tapes to look at. I said, he's telling you how to address the police.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:09:01.000]  Well, he needs to get a motion for discovery filed in this case ASAP to get copies of that.
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  He did. And they blacked all their names and everything.
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:10.000]  We did that a week ago and there was nothing in there to describe again what he really did,
[01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:14.000]  except for the officer that pulled him over has now quit the force.
[01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  Then move to dismiss for lack of evidence.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:23.000]  Gotcha. That's what I needed to know, dismiss for lack of evidence.
[01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  I know there's other callers waiting, and I'm going to be calling your law to get your information for the classes that you're offering.
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:33.000]  And I look forward to seeing you someday soon.
[01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  Yes, sir. Well, you have a good night. Thanks for calling in.
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:38.000]  Thank you so much, Jim.
[01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:40.000]  You're welcome. Bye bye.
[01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  All right. Now I've got a wireless caller in California, area code 309. What's your name?
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:53.000]  That's Steve from Illinois.
[01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:57.000]  Oh, okay. Well, Steve from Illinois, what do you got?
[01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  Okay. I'm one of the guys that annoy you on Facebook.
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  You don't annoy me. Nobody annoys me. They aggravate me sometimes, but they don't annoy me.
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:13.000]  Okay. I aggravate you.
[01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  I had court last week, and I've been trying to study through these Illinois vehicle codes and stuff.
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:28.000]  And I keep coming up with stuff that pertains to the commercial activity, even the definition of commerce.
[01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  I believe, if you remember, I messaged you about it, that I found in there that commerce is defined as a business, blah, blah, blah, and transportation.
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  Okay. You recommended that I use that.
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  So I went to court last week, and I was there for five minutes. I waited for 45 minutes, and I was in for five minutes.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:56.000]  We went in there. They did their little thing.
[01:10:56.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  The Assistant State's Attorney started rattling off the charges that I was driving, and I objected.
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  I said, do you have proof that I was driving?
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:13.000]  Of course, the judge overruled.
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:18.000]  She kept talking.
[01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:23.000]  I asked them to define what driving was.
[01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  The judge overruled, said he didn't have to define.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:37.000]  I brought up the fact that driving was a commerce act.
[01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  Do you have evidence that I was acting in commerce?
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:46.000]  He overruled and said he didn't have to.
[01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  At that point, he just went ahead and said, he turned to the clerk and said, okay, what's the...
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:11:58.000]  Or, I'm sorry. He looked at the clerk and said, get me a date.
[01:11:58.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  Went to the Assistant State's Attorney and said, do you want to move this forward to trial?
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:08.000]  She said, yeah, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:12:08.000 --> 01:12:12.000]  That was pretty much the whole time that I was in there.
[01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:18.000]  Okay. Have you looked at the rules and procedures for disqualifying a judge in this court
[01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:22.000]  when the judge doesn't comply with the rules of evidence in the law?
[01:12:22.000 --> 01:12:24.000]  No, I have not done that.
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  Well, that's the best way to swat a fly like that and squash him.
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:37.000]  When a judge acts contrary to law and the rules of proper procedure and the rules of evidence,
[01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  the judge can be disqualified flat out for that.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:49.000]  And you need to make sure that they are because that goes on their record when they're disqualified.
[01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:56.000]  You also can make sure that you do that and you get them replaced by filing judicial conduct
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  complaints against them because that creates a conflict of interest.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  Okay.
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:08.000]  When you can specifically file allegations against them that show that they violated the rules of
[01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:13.000]  procedure, evidence, and law, and that's why you're moving to disqualify them,
[01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:18.000]  and you file that with the judicial conduct committee, whether they act on it or not,
[01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:21.000]  it creates that conflict.
[01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  Okay.
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:27.000]  And that right there is all the grounds you need to get rid of them and get one in there that will
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:29.000]  follow the law.
[01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  Yeah, because I had a judge that was in there the last three times that I had been there.
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:40.000]  It was a woman judge.
[01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:44.000]  She seemed to listen to everything, my questions and stuff.
[01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:52.000]  Of course, at the time, the excuse was this isn't the time to answer them questions, blah, blah, blah.
[01:13:52.000 --> 01:13:57.000]  But she was not out of line.
[01:13:57.000 --> 01:14:07.000]  When she asked me questions and I felt that I was being back into a corner, I just would say that,
[01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:11.000]  you know, at this time, I would like to invoke my fifth amendment.
[01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:16.000]  She obliged that and moved on, you know.
[01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  Well, rather than invoking your right directly like that, get more information out of them first.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:29.000]  Judge, I have to ask you, can any of the information you're asking me in this question be used against me
[01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:33.000]  in a court of law or to potentially incriminate me in some way that I'm not yet aware of?
[01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:36.000]  Well, that was on my first one when I went in.
[01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:41.000]  Yeah, and then when she goes, well, I guess it could, well, in that case, I invoke my right to remain silent.
[01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  Thank you very much for asking, but I have to decline to reply.
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:46.000]  Okay, I got you.
[01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  I should have let up to it, huh?
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:49.000]  Okay.
[01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:56.000]  Yeah, the thing about it is you don't want to appear like you're being intentionally antagonistic in these settings,
[01:14:56.000 --> 01:15:01.000]  but you also don't want to let them feel like you're just anybody's fool either.
[01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  Right.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  Yes, I had, I minded my manners.
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:07.000]  I was quiet.
[01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:11.000]  I wasn't loud or anything like that.
[01:15:11.000 --> 01:15:18.000]  It's just that every time, as you said, you questioned them, how does that apply to me?
[01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  How is that defined?
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  How is there proof that I was acting under common, you know?
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  And every answer was, we don't have to answer that.
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:36.000]  Well, the problem they're having is if they're saying that we can convict you without evidence,
[01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:38.000]  that's something you need to expose right then and there.
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  Judge, I object, is the court stating on the record that it is possible for you to find probable cause
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  despite the fact there is no evidence that would provide it?
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  Are you attempting to say that you're going to take me into a prosecutorial situation
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  and prosecute me for criminal activity despite the fact that there is no evidence in the record
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  that would substantiate your ability to find that probable cause?
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:11.000]  If that is the court's intention, I demand right now I move the court to provide me
[01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  with the findings of facts and conclusions of law relating to how you came to probable cause.
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:23.000]  Right, and here's another thing is they don't even have a license.
[01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:30.000]  They have no license to even put forth to say they have jurisdiction.
[01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  In fact, well, again, remember, they don't care about that.
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:37.000]  They operate on presumption.
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:40.000]  You have to interrupt that presumption.
[01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  That's your whole job.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  They begin with a presumption.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  That's why they're saying they don't have to have evidence of this.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  It's presumed.
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  And that's what you have to challenge is that presumption.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:54.000]  Hang on just a second, Steve, and we'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:55.000]  We got a break.
[01:16:55.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back, 512-646-1984.
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:29.000]  Thanks also to MyMagicMud.com.
[01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  The first 40 people to donate $25 get a jar of MyMagicMud valued at $25.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  Thanks also to All About Vapor at 4631 Airport Boulevard.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  The 10 third place winners will get a $25 gift card.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:46.000]  Stop smelling like a putt at AllAboutVapor.com.
[01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  Also, thanks to Eddie Craig, folks who buy the rule of law traffic seminar,
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:53.000]  get 10 entries into the contest.
[01:17:53.000 --> 01:17:57.000]  Check out the contest rules and details at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:17:57.000 --> 01:18:01.000]  Terror status or hipsters may not actually lose or win.
[01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:07.000]  except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:10.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves,
[01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:12.000]  and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:12.000 --> 01:18:18.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:23.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:23.000 --> 01:18:26.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:30.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[01:18:30.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  most of which we reject.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:35.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much,
[01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Order now.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:15.000]  This is the Logos Lafogos Radio Network.
[01:19:15.000 --> 01:19:28.000]  Ain't gonna blame me, don't blame me.
[01:19:28.000 --> 01:19:37.000]  Well, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:42.000]  I was blindsided, but now I can see your plan.
[01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:46.000]  You put the fear in my pocket.
[01:19:46.000 --> 01:19:48.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:50.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:54.000]  All right, real quick before we get back on the calls, folks,
[01:19:54.000 --> 01:19:56.000]  we still need help with the network fundraiser.
[01:19:56.000 --> 01:20:00.000]  We haven't gotten anywhere near the goal that was set for it,
[01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:02.000]  and yesterday was the deadline.
[01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:05.000]  We're probably going to have to go into extended mode for that,
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:08.000]  but please, if you can, whatever you can in any amount,
[01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:13.000]  please help support this network because if we don't have you out there helping us,
[01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:15.000]  we're not going to be here.
[01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  Even individually, you know, even if you're donating to me,
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:21.000]  I can't survive without the network,
[01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  and there's nothing for me to broadcast on to get to you without the network.
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:26.000]  So keep that in mind.
[01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:30.000]  As much as you can, as often as you can, regularly would be great,
[01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  but whatever you can do to help raise the funds to keep us going is greatly appreciated.
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  So please go to the Rule of Law website or the Logos Radio Network website
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  and click on the fundraiser.
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:44.000]  Get into the drawings for the guns and the gun parts.
[01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:46.000]  Buy the seminar material.
[01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:52.000]  Whatever it is you can do, please, let's do that because without that money,
[01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  there is no Rule of Law.
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  All right, that being said, let's get back to our caller here.
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:01.000]  All right, Steve, go ahead and continue.
[01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:04.000]  Okay, just one quick question.
[01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:09.000]  They also made false claims at the hearing, too.
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:17.000]  They laid the claim that my license had been suspended on February of 2014.
[01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:24.000]  Actually, my license I allowed to expire on February of 2014.
[01:21:24.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  Okay, did you demand they put records into evidence showing that it was suspended?
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:36.000]  Yes, and he overruled and said they don't have to.
[01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:38.000]  Objection.
[01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:42.000]  If the prosecution is going to be allowed to testify as to facts in this case,
[01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:47.000]  I demand they be removed as a prosecution, sworn in as a witness,
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:50.000]  and that competent evidence be provided.
[01:21:50.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  If you're not going to make them do that, Judge,
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:58.000]  I move to dismiss because you are colluding with the prosecution
[01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:03.000]  to prevent me from getting a fair and impartial trial.
[01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  See how easy that is?
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:09.000]  Well, I did not say it that eloquently, but I did object.
[01:22:09.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  Well, hey, dip, you know, you can follow the rest of that, I'm supposing, but...
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:18.000]  Right, but, well, I objected.
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:23.000]  I said, is there proof that my license was suspended in 2014?
[01:22:23.000 --> 01:22:25.000]  And he said, we don't have to.
[01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  And I said, are you practicing law from the bench?
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  He got a little perturbed over that.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  He says, no, I am not practicing law from the bench.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:39.000]  And I said, then how are you going to prove my license was suspended?
[01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  And he says, I don't have to again.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:42.000]  I've already told you.
[01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:43.000]  No, no, no, that's the thing.
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  You don't ask the Judge how he's going to prove it.
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  It's not up to the Judge to prove it.
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  He's not there to prove it.
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  See, that's where they're playing games with you.
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:57.000]  If you think they're not listening to every syllable of what you say,
[01:22:57.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  you're mistaken.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  They are playing lawyer word games.
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  Don't ever ask the Judge what he's going to prove, not his job.
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:15.000]  Judge, under the rules of evidence, the prosecutor is attempting to testify
[01:23:15.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  in this case as to evidence and facts of this case.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:21.000]  I object.
[01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  Are you going to overrule me and allow them to do this?
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  If so, I move for your disqualification because you are not providing me with
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:35.000]  a fair and impartial trial, nor are you complying with the rules of evidence.
[01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:39.000]  Okay.
[01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:43.000]  I did object one time on the fact that he...
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  One time?
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:47.000]  Sounds like you should have never stopped.
[01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:51.000]  Well, I made several, but one of my objections was that the statements of
[01:23:51.000 --> 01:23:56.000]  counsel in brief and argument are not sufficient for summary judgment.
[01:23:56.000 --> 01:23:59.000]  He overruled that as well.
[01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:03.000]  Because the cop that wrote the tickets wasn't even there.
[01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:06.000]  There was nobody there but another...
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:07.000]  Okay.
[01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  What type of proceeding was this?
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  It was supposed to be a motion, I believe.
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  A motion from who?
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:20.000]  A motion to present motion.
[01:24:20.000 --> 01:24:23.000]  I had already challenged your section.
[01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:26.000]  What motion did the state present?
[01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:28.000]  None.
[01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:33.000]  Then how did the information relating to your license come into the record?
[01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  Well, she started throwing it out there, and that's why I started objecting.
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:45.000]  You should be able to do something about this after the fact.
[01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  You should be able to move to disqualify the judge and move to dismiss the case
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  for prosecutorial misconduct.
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  State very clearly, the prosecutor presented false information via testimony in
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:06.000]  violation of the rules of procedure, being sworn in as a witness, and acting as
[01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:13.000]  a prosecutor in a case all at the same time, and provided false statements to
[01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:17.000]  the court for the purpose of attempting to follow through with a malicious
[01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  prosecution.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:25.000]  The court colluded with the prosecutor to facilitate that series of events and
[01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  allow the court and the prosecutor to move forward with the case, despite a
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  lack of evidence and despite the prosecutorial misconduct and the fraudulent
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  statements made on the record.
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  Go after them, man.
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:40.000]  Don't just stand by and take it.
[01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  Oh, no, no, no.
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:42.000]  I wanted to wait.
[01:25:42.000 --> 01:25:46.000]  I wanted to wait because I'm still trying to find out.
[01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  I'm trying to get some information from my representative here.
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  Can I ask you a question?
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:57.000]  I understand what you want to wait on, but let me ask you a question.
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:26:01.000]  What is something you don't have the luxury of doing when you're standing in
[01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  quicksand?
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:05.000]  Waiting.
[01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:07.000]  There you go.
[01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:09.000]  Yep, yep.
[01:26:09.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  I'm trying to get a couple of pieces of information yet also because the cop
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:24.000]  that stopped me was a village cop on a state highway.
[01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:30.000]  He was parked on the state highway running radar and whatever else, and I'm
[01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  trying to get information.
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:38.000]  I cannot find it myself, so I call my representative to find out the
[01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:39.000]  information.
[01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  It's been over a week now.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  This has been a week to get information on where they get jurisdiction, to
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  leave their city limits, and go out onto a state interstate, and I haven't
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:55.000]  gotten no reply back yet.
[01:26:55.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  Well, then file a motion to suppress.
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:01.000]  That should have been something else you filed, a motion to suppress
[01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  evidence and testimony gotten by the cop who was acting without lawful
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  authority outside of his jurisdiction.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  Because this village has been sued several times over speed traps, police
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:25.000]  brutality, blah, blah, blah, so they've got a pretty good record going for
[01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:26.000]  them.
[01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  So that being said, I will get off here so you have some other callers to
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  get on there.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  I'll aggravate you some more during the end of the week or something if I
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:39.000]  get some more information.
[01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:40.000]  Okay.
[01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  And I appreciate your help.
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:42.000]  All right.
[01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  No problem.
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:44.000]  Thanks a lot.
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:45.000]  All right.
[01:27:45.000 --> 01:27:46.000]  You have a good night.
[01:27:46.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  You too.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:48.000]  All right.
[01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:50.000]  Now we have Steve in Texas.
[01:27:50.000 --> 01:27:53.000]  Steve, what can we do for you?
[01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:54.000]  Oh, yes.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:27:56.000]  Thank you for your show.
[01:27:56.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  I have a complaint here attached to underneath it is the information.
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:12.000]  And when the assailant signs the complaint, I know they're responsible for
[01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  the complaint part, but are they also responsible for the information part?
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:23.000]  Well, when you say the information part, are we talking about the document or
[01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  are we talking about something in the document?
[01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:32.000]  Well, like I said, I have the complaint right here, the document.
[01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  What's the charge?
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  Okay.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  No driver's license.
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:44.000]  And then in the information part, where it has driver's license listed, it
[01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  has my expired state ID number.
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:51.000]  It doesn't have a driver's license because I haven't had one for so long.
[01:28:51.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  Well, if they're going to prove that you had a driving law license expired,
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  which there's no such charge in Texas, they would have an issue.
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:04.000]  But when did you have a license?
[01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:09.000]  The last time I had one was in 2006.
[01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:12.000]  And did it expire on its own?
[01:29:12.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  Did you turn it in?
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:14.000]  What happened with it?
[01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:17.000]  No, it just expired in 2006.
[01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  Okay.
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  And the charge is what?
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  Well, I have several charges, and one of them is no driver's license,
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:31.000]  expired registration, and then underneath the complaint is the information,
[01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:37.000]  and they all have a state ID number that's expired also.
[01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:38.000]  Okay.
[01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  So I was wondering, is the police officer, the offense, assigned it?
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  Is he also responsible for the false information?
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  Well, hang on just a second, and we'll talk about that on the other side, okay?
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:54.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio 512-646.
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  We've got two more segments.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:30:02.000]  We'll be right back after this break and finish up with our callers.
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  Do not pass go.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:05.000]  Go directly to jail.
[01:30:05.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  That's what lawbreakers normally hear from courts.
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  But in Alabama, one judge is offering offenders a unique option for punishment.
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and in a moment I'll tell you what it is.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:41.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:49.000]  No country puts a bigger share of its citizens behind bars than the U.S.
[01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:54.000]  But in Baymanet, Alabama, one judge is offering a novel alternative to jail,
[01:30:54.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  go to church on Sundays.
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  This only applies to people convicted of misdemeanors,
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:03.000]  and offenders must check in weekly with their pastor and the police.
[01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:06.000]  Then after 52 sermons, their cases are dismissed.
[01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  The ACLU says this violates the separation between church and state,
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  and other critics say it's unfair to atheists and minority religions.
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:17.000]  But I see the program is at least worth trying.
[01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  Being in church on Sunday rather than a prison cell
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:22.000]  just might change the lives of people on the wrong path.
[01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albert for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:03.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:09.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails,
[01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:13.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails,
[01:32:13.000 --> 01:32:15.000]  but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:16.000]  That's why you have insurance,
[01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:19.000]  and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you
[01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:22.000]  And we accept Bitcoin.
[01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  As a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints,
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:30.000]  you can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim
[01:32:30.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:41.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:44.000]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network
[01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  I mean, I'd actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:52.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:52.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  All right, we're still talking with Steve in Texas.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:56.000]  All right, Steve, go ahead.
[01:33:56.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  Why is the officer being responsible for the false information?
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:02.000]  In the complaint, who signed the complaint?
[01:34:02.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  Was it the officer or someone else?
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  Who signed the information, the prosecuting attorney?
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  The officer may not even know any of that's in there if he didn't sign either one of them.
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  So the answer to your question is, we don't know.
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:20.000]  Okay, yeah.
[01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  Because I don't think a prosecuting attorney, there's no signature.
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  The prosecuting attorney is the only one who can do an information,
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:33.000]  and that has to be a county or district attorney.
[01:34:33.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  Okay.
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:38.000]  Okay, so he's not responsible.
[01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:41.000]  How about on a warrant?
[01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:47.000]  Because they put out a warrant also, and they arrested me,
[01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  and they took me to jail, and they booked me, and then they asked me for my driver's license number,
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  and I said, well, I don't have one.
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  So they gave me my clothes back, and they released me, and I told them I wanted the warrant.
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  So they gave me the warrant, and they didn't fill out the part on officer's return
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:10.000]  and said I should go back to court over it.
[01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:23.000]  So the judge that signed it, I guess she's also responsible for having a fake driver's license on the warrant,
[01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  but that part is like the information is still under her signature.
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:34.000]  So my question is, is she responsible?
[01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:38.000]  She creates the whole warrant when she signs it, but the information...
[01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  So someone has to file a statement of probable cause for her to sign it.
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  Right.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:45.000]  Where is that?
[01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  Besides the warrant, where is the probable cause statement?
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:57.000]  Well, the probable cause, it says that she had to have a sworn complaint before she signed it,
[01:35:57.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  but there wasn't one.
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  They didn't do it until afterwards.
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  Can you prove that?
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:05.000]  Yeah, I got all the paperwork.
[01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  Okay.
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:12.000]  So again, where was the statement of probable cause to issue the warrant?
[01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:14.000]  Well, there wasn't one.
[01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  I already know...
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:17.000]  Okay, that is my point.
[01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:20.000]  What's wrong with this picture?
[01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:26.000]  No warrant shall issue except upon statement of probable cause
[01:36:26.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  sworn to by the officer making said statement.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  Right.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:36.000]  And you have a warrant that doesn't have one of those.
[01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  Why is this judge still a judge?
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:42.000]  I got three warrants like that.
[01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  You're missing my whole point here.
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  Right, I understand that, and you're correct.
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:51.000]  But what I'm looking at is I have a fourth warrant for failure to appear.
[01:36:51.000 --> 01:36:53.000]  Want to bet?
[01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  Move to quash the warrant, file judicial conduct complaints,
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  and official oppression charges and abuse of official capacity charges
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:06.000]  against this judge for issuing unconstitutional,
[01:37:06.000 --> 01:37:12.000]  illegal arrest warrants without statements of probable cause.
[01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:14.000]  Well, I'm going to do that for three of them.
[01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:17.000]  No, you're going to do it for all of them.
[01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:23.000]  And then you're going to file a motion to recall the last warrant.
[01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:27.000]  The last one for failure to appear, she did have a sworn statement
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  that I didn't appear.
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:32.000]  But then on the information part, it still has...
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:34.000]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  Who signed the sworn statement for the failure to appear?
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:41.000]  I can't really make out who the name is.
[01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:47.000]  I need to go down there and ask them because I did actually appear.
[01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  And the judge was there when you appeared?
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  No, when I went into the court, within the 30 days,
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  they said they were ready, and they had the...
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:02.000]  What I later found out, they had the information filed,
[01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  but there was no sworn complaint.
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:06.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:11.000]  You have a copy of an information that was filed before a complaint was filed?
[01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  Yes.
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  Then filed bar agreements against the prosecuting attorney and the judge.
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:20.000]  Right, but see, I know that part,
[01:38:20.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  but I'm trying to pin who's putting on this fake driver's license.
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  I want to add that on to everything else.
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  You don't have the answer to that question.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:36.000]  So let's deal with what we do have information about.
[01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:37.000]  Okay, okay.
[01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:46.000]  Yeah, they didn't sign the sworn complaint until nine months after they filed the information.
[01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  And I know they're not supposed to do that.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:51.000]  It's information based on complaint.
[01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  And then they put out these arrest warrants,
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:02.000]  three of them, without any sworn complaint, and she signed it.
[01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  So I'm going to get her on that,
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:08.000]  but I wanted to also get on the false driver's license number
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  because they would have booked me into jail,
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  but they didn't commit me because there wasn't a driver's license number.
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:17.000]  They could come up with.
[01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:20.000]  So they just gave me my clothes back, and I said, well, let me have the warrant.
[01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  And they gave them to me, and they gave me the paper with the booking number and stuff on it,
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:26.000]  and I wouldn't sign it.
[01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:28.000]  So then I left, and I, you know, eventually...
[01:39:28.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  Stop waiting on them.
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  You've already got a lawsuit, huge lawsuit right here.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  Yeah, I know.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  I'm looking for some extra stuff, who to pin on the fake driver's license.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  Well, you might be able to find all that out after you file suit and the other and do discovery.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:45.000]  Yeah.
[01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  Well, when I went to see the clerk when I first went in,
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  and she asked me what's the driver's license number.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  I said I didn't have one, and then she put in, I guess,
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:02.000]  I later saw on the electronic form on the docket,
[01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  did I enter the plea of not guilty, which I didn't.
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  So I put in a notice, whoever enters the plea on my behalf will bear all liability.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:13.000]  You know, so I've already done that.
[01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  But there hasn't been a trial yet.
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  They had to reschedule it, and they haven't scheduled it yet.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  So I'm just, you know, I'm either going to file on the judge.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  I'm going to file on the judge.
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  I'm not sure about filing on the police officer because of the information that's under his complaint.
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  You know, I don't know if I can pin that on him for the false driver's license number,
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:39.000]  but he didn't write one on the ticket either.
[01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:42.000]  He just left it blank.
[01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:48.000]  So I'm just looking for every bit of everything I can do to them.
[01:40:48.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  Yeah.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:53.000]  Well, like I say, discovery will get you more than just speculation at this point.
[01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:59.000]  But you've got enough based upon the paperwork to go after these people.
[01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  Right.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:09.000]  So if I get discovery, how do I go about getting the discovery on who entered the false driver's license number?
[01:41:09.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  Well, that would be done by probably the computer system.
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:14.000]  They have to log into that computer system,
[01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:20.000]  and the system usually tracks who makes updates to what record information.
[01:41:20.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  So you would need the computer records, or you would need somebody to admit that, hey, I did that.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:29.000]  Yeah, because nobody actually signed the paper.
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:31.000]  I got them signed and everything else.
[01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:32.000]  Okay.
[01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  Well, that's all I wanted to know.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:34.000]  Thank you.
[01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  All right.
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:36.000]  No problem.
[01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:37.000]  Okay. Bye.
[01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  Bye.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:40.000]  We have William in Texas.
[01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  William, what do you have?
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:44.000]  Yes.
[01:41:44.000 --> 01:41:52.000]  I was pulled over by DPS outside of Phoenix County, Texas, in the 75.
[01:41:52.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  Police officer told me to get out of my car.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:55.000]  I'm a veteran.
[01:41:55.000 --> 01:41:56.000]  I'm 100% disabled.
[01:41:56.000 --> 01:41:58.000]  I have chronic pain disorder.
[01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:00.000]  I get out of the car, and when I'm getting out of the car,
[01:42:00.000 --> 01:42:07.000]  I grab the April 21 Supreme Court ruling saying you cannot hold people for more than just to write the citation.
[01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:11.000]  And I entered the police officer's office and said, this is why you all are being killed right now.
[01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  You keep treating American citizens like third world country.
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  Okay.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:17.000]  Hold on a second, William.
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  Word to the wise, not your best choice of words.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  Okay.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  Right.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:26.000]  But it's the obvious truth.
[01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:27.000]  Well, it may be.
[01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:32.000]  But on the side of the road where they outnumber you, that's not a good choice of words,
[01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:39.000]  because all he's got to do now to kill you is say that you said the word kill to him, and now he's suddenly justified.
[01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  Well, I made sure he had his camera on.
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  Anyway, so he tells me to lay down on the ground, and I said no.
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:49.000]  And so then he calls for backup.
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  Then he tells me to go get my license, which is in the car.
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:55.000]  As I go to get my license, I go to grab my keys out of my pocket.
[01:42:55.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  He says I have a gun.
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  I have a knife, and he pulls the gun on me.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:05.000]  Then backup arrives, which were city and county, and they tase me, and I flip the barbs off.
[01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:11.000]  Then they tackle me, both men laying on top of me, the man on top of the man laying right on top of me,
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:15.000]  shoots me a point blank across the heart with a taser.
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  At that point, they roll me over, and they start stomping on my elbows, my right elbow,
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:27.000]  and they've already popped my shoulder out of socket when they've tackled me, and my back's now killing me.
[01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  Then them two, two of the cops go back to the DPS car, I guess to look at the video,
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  and while they're at the video, another police officer is holding me by the hair.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  Okay, well hang on a second, William.
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  We've got a break to take, and we'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  In the meantime, you need to start calling some attorneys.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  Hold on just a second.
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:51.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  We are coming up into our last segment, so y'all hang in there,
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:43:57.000]  and we'll get this wrapped up before we close out.
[01:43:57.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  I hope we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Sorry!
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  What?
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:17.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  You have no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:33.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:37.000]  and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:41.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries
[01:44:41.000 --> 01:44:44.000]  without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:44.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  call 512-480-2503 or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:08.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:08.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:14.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:14.000 --> 01:46:25.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:25.000 --> 01:46:29.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking with Jimmy in Texas.
[01:46:29.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  All right, Jimmy, go ahead.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  It's William.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:34.000]  I'm sorry, William.
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:35.000]  It's all right.
[01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  Anyway, so while they're looking at the dashcam video,
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  the other police officer is kicking me in the back where I had my operation recently, which failed.
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:48.000]  He's kicking me, and he's saying, quit resisting, quit resisting, quit resisting the rest.
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  And I'm like screaming back at him.
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:50.000]  I'm not resisting.
[01:46:50.000 --> 01:46:53.000]  I'm sitting here with my handcuffs on, on my butt, and a lot of pain.
[01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  Anyway, they call an ambulance.
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  The ambulance took the barbs out.
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:58.000]  They were stuck in so deep.
[01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:02.000]  The lady pushed him in a couple of times to make it hurt more though before she did it.
[01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:05.000]  And then I told them I wanted to go to the emergency room because I'm in tons of pain.
[01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  I'm sitting at 10 on the pain scale at this point.
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  And they get to the emergency room, and they want to draw blood and urine.
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:14.000]  I said, no, you made me sign a paper saying I'm paying for it.
[01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:17.000]  If I'm paying for it, I want an x-ray and a shot for pain.
[01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:18.000]  They refused to do it.
[01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:23.000]  The doctors said you're refusing service, even though I wasn't.
[01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:24.000]  I just wanted service.
[01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  I was asking for it.
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:26.000]  So they take me to jail.
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:35.000]  And I sit there all night long with about 9 and 10 pain scales for about 10 hours until my wife was able to come get me out.
[01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:41.000]  They didn't charge me with speeding. They gave me a warning.
[01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:46.000]  They charged me with resisting arrest, search, or transport.
[01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:53.000]  And they charged me with an open container and a motor vehicle.
[01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:54.000]  Anyway, so I'm sitting in jail.
[01:47:54.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  And the morning comes when they're getting ready to get me out, the bailiff comes back because I'm not talking to anyone.
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:04.000]  And he says if I don't tell him what he needs to know or if I don't talk to him, he's going to have the guys in the prison.
[01:48:04.000 --> 01:48:07.000]  In a holding lockup, beat me up.
[01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:08.000]  He didn't say beat me up.
[01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:10.000]  He insinuated.
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  In other words, you don't stand them and do something.
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  I want to make these guys suffer or they're going to hurt you is how it came across to me.
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  And so I just told them the exact same thing I told the other policemen.
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:24.000]  You know, this is why y'all are getting shot.
[01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:28.000]  You guys don't treat American citizens the way they're supposed to be treated.
[01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:34.000]  You violate their, you know, their inerrant rights.
[01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  Anyway, that's where I'm at.
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:39.000]  I just had November 6th.
[01:48:39.000 --> 01:48:43.000]  I've been trying to get a copy of the dashcam video and I'm getting a runaround.
[01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  I have no cause number.
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:48.000]  I know how I used to be a paralegal.
[01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:51.000]  I can't seem to get a hold of anyone in Austin.
[01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:57.000]  I find the number to get open records so I can get the dashcam video in the name of the three officers who were beating me up.
[01:48:57.000 --> 01:49:02.000]  I don't know what to do and I'm, you know, I got PTSD.
[01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  I need a lawyer and I can't find one and I can't go with anyone local because they're all corrupt.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  Well, if you can find one anywhere that's not a crook in that regard, then you're better off.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:19.000]  The problem here is you've got criminal attorneys versus civil rights attorneys and they all fight for you in various degrees.
[01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:21.000]  It just depends.
[01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  But they're all in it for the money, not for you.
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  If you can't pay them, you're not getting justice no matter what.
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:28.000]  Right.
[01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:29.000]  And I can't pay them.
[01:49:29.000 --> 01:49:30.000]  I am on the verge of bankruptcy.
[01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  Well, the problem is if you're looking for somebody to tell you what attorney to find, this ain't the show to do it because I wouldn't recommend an attorney to the worst person on the planet.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:40.000]  I don't recommend attorneys.
[01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:48.000]  I'm not going to recommend attorneys because the whole purpose of my job is to teach you how to do stuff without an attorney.
[01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  And I don't trust any of them as far as I can throw a building.
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:54.000]  So I'm not about to have people calling me back.
[01:49:54.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  Well, this attorney screwed me and you recommended him.
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:49:58.000]  No, I didn't.
[01:49:58.000 --> 01:50:01.000]  I understand.
[01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  So even if I wanted to, I couldn't tell you one because I don't know any and I wouldn't recommend somebody I didn't trust and I don't trust any.
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:10.000]  Right.
[01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:16.000]  You wouldn't know the number that I can call to get the copy of the DPS video, cash can video, would you?
[01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:17.000]  You don't call a number.
[01:50:17.000 --> 01:50:21.000]  You file a public information request for it.
[01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:27.000]  Look under Chapter 522 of the government code, tells you how to write one.
[01:50:27.000 --> 01:50:28.000]  Chapter 522?
[01:50:28.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  Yep.
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  Government code?
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:32.000]  Yep.
[01:50:32.000 --> 01:50:34.000]  Okay.
[01:50:34.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  That's the open, that's the Public Information Act.
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:43.000]  Okay.
[01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  All right.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  And who do I submit to? I walk through the courthouse talking to the JP court, the district court, and they say they have no record of me on their dockets.
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:01.000]  And then my bailiff says it can be two years before they try me or call me in.
[01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:03.000]  Well, it depends.
[01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:10.000]  On misdemeanors, it can be up to two years before they can't prosecute you on the statute of limitations.
[01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:23.000]  All right. And then the police officer, oh, and the DPS officer right before he left, he said I could file federal charges against you for assaulting an officer.
[01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:27.000]  Well, let him go right ahead and do that would be my suggestion.
[01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  Oh, that's what I told, you know, I don't know what you're talking about.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:42.000]  No, I just don't know what to do. You know, there's a Public Information Act, would that be at the county that they're not going to do anything about?
[01:51:42.000 --> 01:51:44.000]  Well, hard to say.
[01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  But the public information, yeah, you're going to file that directly with the Department of Public Safety relating to what county and everything that you're in.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:52:02.000]  Okay. You're going to file it with the DPS, but you're going to reference that county in the name of the officer if you know it.
[01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:05.000]  Yes, yes.
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  Okay.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:08.000]  Okay. And that's it?
[01:52:08.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  That's it.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:12.000]  Okay. Thank you.
[01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:13.000]  You're welcome.
[01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:21.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Jimmy in Maryland. Jimmy, what do you got?
[01:52:21.000 --> 01:52:23.000]  Hello, Jimmy.
[01:52:23.000 --> 01:52:24.000]  Yeah, can you hear me?
[01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:26.000]  I can now. Go ahead.
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:40.000]  Okay, yeah. I filed a, I really hate this caucus for a post-inviction, and I filed a waiver for court costs, which was denied.
[01:52:40.000 --> 01:52:45.000]  So now I'm killing the judges' decision to deny my waiver.
[01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:55.000]  All right. The information is identical, so I'm anticipating judges going to deny my appeal. So I don't know what to do when judges deny my appeal.
[01:52:55.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  Well, the thing about it is if they're denying your appeal because of money, that itself is an appealable issue.
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:04.000]  Okay.
[01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:09.000]  Because that means that only people with money get access to the courts in Maryland.
[01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  Mm-hmm.
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:17.000]  All right. So you should be able, if you can't get the court that you're in to grant it, go to a higher court.
[01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:20.000]  Go to the appellate court if they have jurisdiction to grant that.
[01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:27.000]  You need to find out what the jurisdictional authority to grant such requests are.
[01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:29.000]  Okay. Let me do that then.
[01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:40.000]  I was informed that the judge that denied my waiver would rule on my, the waiver for appeal, that they should rule on that before it can go to the appellate court.
[01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  So I'm anticipating if it's the same judge, the same information, she's most likely going to deny.
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:54.000]  She ruled that it was fictitious, that my information was fictitious. I had no bank account, stuff like that. I worked but had no bank account.
[01:53:54.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  Okay. So how would she know it's fictitious?
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:10.000]  That's a good question. Some reason, I guess, was she looking at she filled us, that was her opinion is fictitious and would not grant the waiver of court costs.
[01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:19.000]  And there's actually two that I'm filing. I can't, you know, I can't afford, and they went up on it, I can't afford them doing, I'm doing two different post-convictions.
[01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  Well, the judge needs better grounds than that, I would think, but you have to look and see what that would take.
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  Find out if there's a way to go around this judge and go to a different court would be my suggestion.
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:32.000]  Okay.
[01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:33.000]  Okay.
[01:54:33.000 --> 01:54:34.000]  All right.
[01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:36.000]  All right. Good luck, Jimmy.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:37.000]  Bye.
[01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  Bye.
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:44.000]  All right. Now we have Mia about a speeding ticket. Mia, what can we do for you?
[01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:50.000]  Hi. I got a speeding ticket just before the new year and...
[01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:52.000]  What state are you in?
[01:54:52.000 --> 01:54:53.000]  Oh, I'm in California.
[01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  Okay.
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:55:02.000]  The policeman that pulled me over said I was going 18 miles an hour over the speed limit.
[01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:07.000]  It was, he said I was going 63 in a 45.
[01:55:07.000 --> 01:55:17.000]  And when he stopped me, I asked him for his name and ID, and he got really mad at me for asking that, and he told me that it would be on the ticket.
[01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:23.000]  And so I just, I continued to ask him for it, and he finally gave it to me.
[01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:27.000]  And by then he was, like, really mad and just didn't want to hear anymore from me.
[01:55:27.000 --> 01:55:33.000]  And so he said, I asked him why he stopped me, and he said I was speeding.
[01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  And I asked, well, if he had any proof, and he said, well, he did a visual assessment and he's certified to be able to see what speed I was going.
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  Right. Well, here's the deal.
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  In California, speeding citations, unless they're over a certain number of miles per hour, I think, but I haven't seen proof of that.
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:56.000]  I've heard it, but I haven't seen it.
[01:55:56.000 --> 01:55:58.000]  So take this with a grain of salt.
[01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:05.000]  But unless there is such a number, speeding citations in California are civil infractions.
[01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  They are not crimes, okay?
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:08.000]  Right.
[01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  Which means the officer violated your rights and the law by pulling you over.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:24.000]  That's a warrantless seizure, which he can do only in the instance of criminal activity.
[01:56:24.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  There was no criminal activity because it's a civil infraction, making everything the officer did illegal and unconstitutional.
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:39.000]  Therefore, what you need to do is this.
[01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  Move to dismiss for lack of evidence.
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:47.000]  Move to dismiss for unconstitutional arrest or detention.
[01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:58.000]  Move to suppress any information and testimony by the officer under the fruit of the poison tree doctrine because anything he got, he got illegally.
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:10.000]  File a complaint with his department that the officer illegally detained you and illegally harassed you without lawful authority, okay?
[01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:12.000]  Okay.
[01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:13.000]  Okay.
[01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:15.000]  Where do I get these?
[01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:21.000]  You have to write them or you need to find examples of them and duplicate them.
[01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:22.000]  Okay.
[01:57:22.000 --> 01:57:29.000]  This is all stuff you need to learn how to do if you're going to defend it yourself, otherwise some attorney is going to steal your money and do nothing.
[01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  Right.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  Right.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:36.000]  My ticket is for $1,300 and I have no idea how I'm going to pay that.
[01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:44.000]  Well, you're not if you'll do what I'm telling you, but you need to find some information on how to write motions and how to file them and do so.
[01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:46.000]  I have seminar material.
[01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  It's $250, but the seminar material gives you a bunch of sample motions.
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:54.000]  You just have to adapt them to California.
[01:57:54.000 --> 01:58:00.000]  But in any case, there should be plenty that you can go down and look up for that, okay?
[01:58:00.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  Examples at the courthouse, for instance, or whatever.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  But that's what I recommend you do because everything the cop did was illegal, okay?
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  Okay.
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:12.000]  All right, Mia.
[01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:13.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  I got to go.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  We're out of time.
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  All right, callers.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  You're watching our Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  Thank you all for calling in.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  And most of all, thanks for listening.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  And once again, please donate to the network.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  We need the funds.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:29.000]  We can't stay on the air without them.
[01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  We live hand in mouth here to do what we do for you.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  Please help us out.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:35.000]  All right, folks.
[01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  You all have a great week.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Good night and God bless.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:03.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says,
[01:59:03.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:26.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:36.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:36.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.