[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.000 --> 00:28.000]  Markets for Wednesday the 3rd of February 2016 are currently treading with gold at $1,138.10 an ounce,
[00:28.000 --> 00:43.000]  silver $14.63 an ounce, Texas crude $29.88 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $370 US currency.
[00:43.000 --> 00:50.000]  Today in history, the year 1966, the Luna 9 Russian spacecraft became the first unmanned probe
[00:50.000 --> 00:55.000]  to achieve a soft landing on the moon, or any other planetary body for that matter.
[00:55.000 --> 01:06.000]  Also known as the YE6 number 13, it was the first probe to transmit photographic data to Earth from the lunar surface.
[01:06.000 --> 01:11.000]  In recent news, Sandra Merritt, one of the two indicted with tampering with governmental documents
[01:11.000 --> 01:16.000]  in order to create fake driver's license and a plot with anti-abortion activists to obtain the undercover video
[01:16.000 --> 01:22.000]  footage exposing Planned Parenthood for selling human body parts, turned herself in to Texas authorities today.
[01:22.000 --> 01:29.000]  She posted her $2,000 bond and was later released. However, the news conference that she was scheduled to hold afterwards was canceled.
[01:29.000 --> 01:34.000]  David Daley-Eiden, the main activist behind the videos, plans to turn himself over to authorities tomorrow,
[01:34.000 --> 01:40.000]  his attorneys have stated. He does ironically face an additional misdemeanor charge related to the purchase of human tissue.
[01:40.000 --> 01:48.000]  Ironic because, if you recall, a grand jury in Houston, Texas that had been tasked with looking into the wrongdoing by Planned Parenthood
[01:48.000 --> 01:52.000]  announced that it was indicting Daley-Eiden and Merritt instead.
[01:57.000 --> 02:04.000]  The results for the Iowa caucus are as follows. For the Republican Party, Ted Cruz, 8 delegates or 27.7 percent.
[02:04.000 --> 02:14.000]  Donald Trump, 7 delegates or 24.3 percent. Mark Rubio, 7 delegates, 23.1 percent. Ben Carson, 3 delegates or 9.3 percent.
[02:14.000 --> 02:26.000]  Rand Paul, 1 delegate, 8,481 votes, 4.1 percent. Officially, Rand Paul did drop out this morning, stating the lack of funds and support as his main cause.
[02:26.000 --> 02:36.000]  Jeb Bush, 1 delegate at 2.8 percent. Carly Farina, 1 delegate at 1.9 percent. And John Kasich, 1 delegate at 1.9 percent.
[02:36.000 --> 02:47.000]  For the Democrats, it was actually decided by a coin toss which gave Hillary 6 wins out of 6 tosses. Hillary Clinton got 23 delegates and Bernie Sanders 21 delegates.
[02:47.000 --> 03:03.000]  This has been your Lowdown for February 3rd, 2016.
[03:17.000 --> 03:27.000]  This has been your Lowdown for February 3rd, 2016.
[03:47.000 --> 03:57.000]  This has been your Lowdown for February 3rd, 2016.
[04:17.000 --> 04:33.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing. Let's get for my men before my horses.
[04:33.000 --> 04:47.000]  Hi, folks. Good evening. This is Rule of Law Radio, the Monday night show with your host, Eddie Craig. It is February 8th, 2016.
[04:47.000 --> 05:00.000]  And so far this year, we've managed to get at least one person killed and many more on the way by once again allowing our federal employees to overstep the limits of their authority.
[05:00.000 --> 05:06.000]  And, of course, I am talking about LeVoy Fennicombe up in Oregon.
[05:06.000 --> 05:23.000]  Now, something a lot of people, it appears, doesn't understand anymore is that the federal government has a limited area of authority and limited types of authority.
[05:23.000 --> 05:37.000]  But you talk to anyone today, even people my age, and they don't have a clue that there is any such thing in existence.
[05:37.000 --> 05:43.000]  And I'm not even sure if I'm shocked by that anymore.
[05:43.000 --> 05:56.000]  So let me go through some stuff about where the federal government, especially the BLM, is overstepping its bounds by a huge margin.
[05:56.000 --> 06:13.000]  Such a margin, in fact, that shooting them is perfectly legitimate because what they're actually doing is what we used to hang and shoot rustlers, land thieves, and cattle thieves, and horse thieves over.
[06:13.000 --> 06:19.000]  It is absolutely no different.
[06:19.000 --> 06:42.000]  When someone that has no right to come into your property and start damaging it, destroying it, or stealing it, and then has the gall to tell you that you have no right to protect yourself from it, we have seriously capsized our nation.
[06:42.000 --> 06:45.000]  And that's exactly what's happened here.
[06:45.000 --> 06:49.000]  What is a state?
[06:49.000 --> 06:53.000]  There's a lot of possible definitions.
[06:53.000 --> 06:59.000]  There is the one where it's the political body that interacts with the federal government.
[06:59.000 --> 07:12.000]  There is the one where it is the soil within the geographical external boundaries of the geographical location known as that state, whatever it may be.
[07:12.000 --> 07:20.000]  But let's talk about the one that is embodied in the federal Constitution and that of the state Constitution itself.
[07:20.000 --> 07:25.000]  And for that, there is only one.
[07:25.000 --> 07:30.000]  And that definition is the people.
[07:30.000 --> 07:36.000]  The state is the people that make it up.
[07:36.000 --> 07:41.000]  It is not the people that represent the people that make it up.
[07:41.000 --> 07:55.000]  It is the entire body of human beings that declare themselves to be members of or to be domiciled within.
[07:55.000 --> 08:18.000]  Now, given that when the federal Constitution reserves political powers not specifically granted to the federal government to the states or to the people, it's being redundant because they are not separate.
[08:18.000 --> 08:22.000]  There is no political body without the people.
[08:22.000 --> 08:28.000]  There is no governmental body without the people.
[08:28.000 --> 08:38.000]  There is nothing that is the state without the people.
[08:38.000 --> 08:46.000]  So the federal Constitution was actually repeating itself when it said it's reserved to the states or the people.
[08:46.000 --> 08:57.000]  The difference, the only difference in what it was actually trying to say in that regard is that for the collective body of the people, we mean the state.
[08:57.000 --> 09:03.000]  For the individual rights of the people, we mean the people.
[09:03.000 --> 09:08.000]  But in both cases, it was us.
[09:08.000 --> 09:13.000]  Now, how many of you knew that before just now?
[09:13.000 --> 09:24.000]  The state was the body collective of the people of the state, not the government, not the imaginary corporate entity or the political body.
[09:24.000 --> 09:28.000]  It's the people as a whole, the state.
[09:28.000 --> 09:42.000]  And then when it says the people, it's referring to the individual rights that were not granted to anyone to take away from them.
[09:42.000 --> 09:50.000]  And that, folks, is where we have lost our way in a huge error.
[09:50.000 --> 10:02.000]  We have allowed those that represent us to convince us that they are the state, and that simply isn't true.
[10:02.000 --> 10:16.000]  We have allowed those that serve us to believe that they are the state, and that is not true.
[10:16.000 --> 10:27.000]  But we are the only ones that can do anything at all about that.
[10:27.000 --> 10:37.000]  In no point in history have I ever found an example where once a political body,
[10:37.000 --> 10:45.000]  and in this case I am talking about those that believe themselves to be the state over the people,
[10:45.000 --> 10:57.000]  that political body has ever surrendered power that it has stolen without there being a civil war to get it back.
[10:57.000 --> 11:02.000]  Not in any time in history has that ever been true.
[11:02.000 --> 11:12.000]  It wasn't true when Marcus Aurelius tried to give the power of Rome back to the Senate and was assassinated for it.
[11:12.000 --> 11:23.000]  It wasn't when the Romans gave up the lands or Alexander the Great or any other conqueror you want to name decided to surrender the power they had.
[11:23.000 --> 11:30.000]  Any power they lost, they lost because someone else took it.
[11:30.000 --> 11:40.000]  And it's been that way since man's been on the face of this planet we call Earth.
[11:40.000 --> 11:46.000]  So where is all of this coming from with BLM and the federal government?
[11:46.000 --> 11:49.000]  It's narcissism is one problem.
[11:49.000 --> 11:56.000]  They all believe they're better than us, those that are yanking the BLM's chains anyway.
[11:56.000 --> 12:05.000]  But let's go over some factual information about what the limits on the federal government is in relation to land in the first place.
[12:05.000 --> 12:13.000]  First off, nowhere in the federal constitution is the federal government given any authority over land within the states
[12:13.000 --> 12:29.000]  unless that land has been ceded to the federal government for the purpose of shipyards, garrisons, and depots and things of that nature and ports.
[12:29.000 --> 12:37.000]  So let's look at some of the court cases the Supreme Court's ruled on over time on this subject.
[12:37.000 --> 12:45.000]  For instance, we have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several states.
[12:45.000 --> 12:50.000]  Each of these governments is distinct from the others and each has citizens of its own.
[12:50.000 --> 12:57.000]  And that's U.S. versus Cruikshank, okay, 92 U.S. 542 in 1875.
[12:57.000 --> 13:07.000]  Now, the states, or in other words, the people that comprise the states are the sovereigns.
[13:07.000 --> 13:12.000]  It is not the federal government or anyone in the federal government.
[13:12.000 --> 13:15.000]  It is not anyone in the state government.
[13:15.000 --> 13:20.000]  It is not a governmental agency or entity.
[13:20.000 --> 13:24.000]  They are not the sovereigns.
[13:24.000 --> 13:36.000]  They have no authority to grant themselves immunity from you and I when they abuse the power that we have allowed them to have.
[13:36.000 --> 13:41.000]  And the operative word there is allowed.
[13:41.000 --> 13:44.000]  It is not theirs by right.
[13:44.000 --> 13:47.000]  It is not theirs by decree.
[13:47.000 --> 13:58.000]  It is theirs only by the knowing and consensual delegation of we the people.
[13:58.000 --> 14:06.000]  We think a proper examination of this subject will show that the United States never held any municipal sovereignty,
[14:06.000 --> 14:17.000]  jurisdiction, or right of soil in and to the territory of which Alabama or any of the new states were formed.
[14:17.000 --> 14:25.000]  Because the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty,
[14:25.000 --> 14:35.000]  or eminent domain within the limits of a state or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted.
[14:35.000 --> 14:43.000]  That's Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 212 in 1845.
[14:43.000 --> 14:52.000]  The phrase in which it is expressly granted refers to Articles 1, Section 8, Clause 17,
[14:52.000 --> 14:58.000]  and Article 9, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, like I was saying earlier.
[14:58.000 --> 15:06.000]  The places where they can have land, it has to be ceded by the state or the territory from which it's gotten.
[15:06.000 --> 15:09.000]  It doesn't belong to the federal government.
[15:09.000 --> 15:16.000]  Even the lands of Puerto Rico and Guam don't belong to the federal government.
[15:16.000 --> 15:23.000]  It belongs to the people that live there.
[15:23.000 --> 15:25.000]  What else do we have?
[15:25.000 --> 15:29.000]  The federal government may not dictate to the states.
[15:29.000 --> 15:36.000]  We held in New York that Congress cannot compel the states to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program.
[15:36.000 --> 15:42.000]  Excuse me, ladies and gentlemen, what the hell is the BLM if it's not a federal regulatory program?
[15:42.000 --> 15:48.000]  Over private lands belonging to the states themselves.
[15:48.000 --> 15:56.000]  Today we hold that Congress cannot circumvent that prohibition by conscripting the states' officers directly.
[15:56.000 --> 16:04.000]  The federal government may neither issue directives requiring the states to address particular problems
[16:04.000 --> 16:15.000]  nor command the states' officers or those of their political subdivisions to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program.
[16:15.000 --> 16:21.000]  Such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty.
[16:21.000 --> 16:26.000]  Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is reversed.
[16:26.000 --> 16:32.000]  This is Prince v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 in 1997.
[16:32.000 --> 16:36.000]  This is the case that got Sheriff Mack on the front page.
[16:36.000 --> 16:46.000]  Okay? But I want to go over some of what's said in this specific case in relation to what was going on up there in Oregon with the BLM.
[16:46.000 --> 16:48.000]  All right, folks, so y'all hang on.
[16:48.000 --> 16:52.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig, and we'll be right back after this break.
[16:52.000 --> 17:02.000]  So y'all hold on.
[17:02.000 --> 17:07.000]  They took their guns and get them back and support the Logos Radio Network at the same time.
[17:07.000 --> 17:12.000]  The following sponsors have stepped up to help keep this network on air with a fundraising contest.
[17:12.000 --> 17:17.000]  Thanks to Central Texas Gun Works with the first prize, the Spike Skull Lower Receiver.
[17:17.000 --> 17:20.000]  Second prize, the Taurus Curve Handgun.
[17:20.000 --> 17:24.000]  Every $25 donation gets a chance to win. Enter as often as you like.
[17:24.000 --> 17:29.000]  Check out centraltexasgunworks.com. Thanks also to mymagicmud.com.
[17:29.000 --> 17:35.000]  The first 40 people to donate $25 get a jar of My Magic Mud valued at $25.
[17:35.000 --> 17:39.000]  Thanks also to All About Vapor at 4631 Airport Boulevard.
[17:39.000 --> 17:43.000]  The 10 third place winners will get a $25 gift card.
[17:43.000 --> 17:46.000]  Stop smelling like a putt at allaboutvapor.com.
[17:46.000 --> 17:53.000]  Also, thanks to Eddie Craig, folks who buy the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar, get 10 entries into the contest.
[17:53.000 --> 17:57.000]  Check out the contest rules and details at logosradionetwork.com.
[17:57.000 --> 18:00.000]  Karystase or hipsters may not actually close with weed.
[18:27.000 --> 18:30.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[18:30.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:42.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:42.000 --> 18:47.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 18:58.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com. Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:58.000 --> 19:01.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:06.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:06.000 --> 19:21.000]  Logosradionetwork.com
[19:21.000 --> 19:37.000]  Logosradionetwork.com
[19:51.000 --> 20:15.000]  Logosradionetwork.com
[20:15.000 --> 20:28.000]  All right, folks, we are back now. Let's get into this just a little bit and see exactly where we have a problem with what BLM is doing in relation to what was said in the case of Prince.
[20:28.000 --> 20:44.000]  The federal government may neither issue directives requiring the states to address particular problems nor command the state's officers or those of their political subdivisions to administer or enforce a regulatory program.
[20:44.000 --> 20:48.000]  All right, here's the deal.
[20:48.000 --> 20:56.000]  Let's talk about the case of the Hammonds in conjunction with the case that's going on up in Oregon.
[20:56.000 --> 21:03.000]  Hammond and his son were sentenced to federal prison, allegedly for arson on federal lands.
[21:03.000 --> 21:10.000]  But there are no federal lands, okay, unless they're part of the lands granted under that article.
[21:10.000 --> 21:19.000]  Here we see very clearly that the state has or the federal government has no authority to commandeer the state's officers.
[21:19.000 --> 21:24.000]  Well, guess what? Let's apply a little logic here.
[21:24.000 --> 21:30.000]  The state's officers cannot commandeer members of the public within that state either.
[21:30.000 --> 21:47.000]  So by any stretch of the imagination, if the federal government cannot commandeer the officers of the state, they cannot lawfully commandeer the people of the state.
[21:47.000 --> 21:59.000]  They cannot apply a federal program to one of the people of the several states any more than they can apply it to the officers of that state.
[21:59.000 --> 22:04.000]  Do you see the problem with that logic if they could?
[22:04.000 --> 22:16.000]  Because if they can apply it to the people, there's nothing to prevent them from applying it to the officers whose sole authority to even exist comes from the people.
[22:16.000 --> 22:30.000]  So how could the Hammons be charged at the federal level for federal crimes when there's nothing federal about anything they did and the federal has no authority over anything they did?
[22:30.000 --> 22:36.000]  How is that possible? Well, I'll tell you how it's possible.
[22:36.000 --> 22:47.000]  Their lawyer didn't challenge the federal jurisdiction to act. He threw them under the bus by waving a jurisdictional challenge.
[22:47.000 --> 23:04.000]  The majority of what is being done at the federal level to the people of the states in almost any instance can be challenged on a jurisdictional basis because they don't have any.
[23:04.000 --> 23:19.000]  If the offense that they are targeting in the federal court is not something specifically granted to them by the Constitution in order to do a criminal charge,
[23:19.000 --> 23:27.000]  they have no authority to pursue one no matter what Title 18 says.
[23:27.000 --> 23:38.000]  Title 18 limits them to protecting you from constitutional intrusions or constitutionally protected intrusions.
[23:38.000 --> 23:50.000]  It cannot criminalize any activity that is not within the purview of the federal government to act upon.
[23:50.000 --> 23:55.000]  Deprivation of rights under color of law is one of those.
[23:55.000 --> 24:00.000]  Violation of the counterfeiting laws is one of those.
[24:00.000 --> 24:06.000]  Violation of immigration laws is one of those.
[24:06.000 --> 24:17.000]  But land management, arson, murder, anything like that that occurs within the borders of a state,
[24:17.000 --> 24:27.000]  even the Oklahoma City bombing, none of that was in the federal court's jurisdiction to here. None of it.
[24:27.000 --> 24:32.000]  The Murrah Building was not ceded property. It belonged to Oklahoma.
[24:32.000 --> 24:37.000]  They were the sole entity with jurisdiction over everything that happened there.
[24:37.000 --> 24:40.000]  I don't care how many federal people got buried in that building.
[24:40.000 --> 24:47.000]  The federal government had no authority to try McVeigh or do anything of the sort.
[24:47.000 --> 24:52.000]  They had no authority to be there investigating anything.
[24:52.000 --> 24:57.000]  The best they could hope for was that the state would allow them to watch.
[24:57.000 --> 25:07.000]  But instead, the states are turning over their internal processes to the federal government to manipulate and control.
[25:07.000 --> 25:14.000]  And that's exactly the situation up in Oregon with their county sheriff.
[25:14.000 --> 25:21.000]  He has betrayed the people that elected him.
[25:21.000 --> 25:32.000]  His entire county, not just the ones that he helped capture, but the entire county that elected him, he's betrayed them.
[25:32.000 --> 25:39.000]  He has committed treason as surely as Benedict Arnold.
[25:39.000 --> 25:49.000]  Because he was the authority that could have told the feds, BLM, all of them, get out.
[25:49.000 --> 25:55.000]  You will not harm the people of this county or anyone in this county.
[25:55.000 --> 26:04.000]  You have no authority here.
[26:04.000 --> 26:06.000]  Be gone.
[26:06.000 --> 26:08.000]  That's what should have happened.
[26:08.000 --> 26:16.000]  But just like Ruby Ridge, just like what happened with the Branch Davidians up in Waco,
[26:16.000 --> 26:29.000]  our local officers failed to protect the public by doing their duty to get rid of the federal government.
[26:29.000 --> 26:37.000]  Every one of these situations has been escalated to the death of someone by the federal government.
[26:37.000 --> 26:46.000]  Every last one of them, they are responsible for every death that has occurred,
[26:46.000 --> 26:56.000]  whether it's one of their own or it's one of those they were after, because they should never have been there.
[26:56.000 --> 27:08.000]  If they had never been there, neither would have the people that were doing what they were doing to get them there have done what they were doing.
[27:08.000 --> 27:13.000]  You see how this winds up in such a mess?
[27:13.000 --> 27:17.000]  And yet, we let this continue.
[27:17.000 --> 27:25.000]  We sit back and say, not my problem, not my problem.
[27:25.000 --> 27:43.000]  It is absolutely abysmal that as Americans, we are this inept, ignorant, and outright stupid about what our public servants are doing
[27:43.000 --> 27:50.000]  when we should know that they have no power to do it.
[27:50.000 --> 27:53.000]  None.
[27:53.000 --> 28:04.000]  And they get away with it because you and everyone else that knows nothing about this have chosen to remain ignorant.
[28:04.000 --> 28:06.000]  And I got news for you, folks.
[28:06.000 --> 28:08.000]  Ignorance is forgivable.
[28:08.000 --> 28:17.000]  Willful ignorance is intentional stupidity, and that is unforgivable.
[28:17.000 --> 28:23.000]  Willful ignorance is what is allowing this to happen.
[28:23.000 --> 28:24.000]  Not my problem.
[28:24.000 --> 28:25.000]  Don't want to get involved.
[28:25.000 --> 28:26.000]  Don't want to know about that.
[28:26.000 --> 28:31.000]  I might have some responsibility to think a perfect thought and do a perfect action if I knew what was really going on.
[28:31.000 --> 28:33.000]  Therefore, don't inform me.
[28:33.000 --> 28:35.000]  Don't educate me.
[28:35.000 --> 28:43.000]  Don't make me wise to what my rights or their limited powers are, because then I might take notice and have to do something,
[28:43.000 --> 28:49.000]  and my football game was on this Sunday, and I wasn't ready to do that.
[28:49.000 --> 28:50.000]  My team didn't win.
[28:50.000 --> 28:52.000]  I didn't make no money off of it.
[28:52.000 --> 29:01.000]  And it changed my life not one little bit whatsoever, except for $300 and frickin' snacks for the neighbors at my party.
[29:01.000 --> 29:03.000]  But people are dying up in Oregon.
[29:03.000 --> 29:05.000]  Oh, well, that ain't my problem at all.
[29:05.000 --> 29:09.000]  Our lands being stolen by the federal government, that ain't my problem at all.
[29:09.000 --> 29:17.000]  They're bailing out everybody in the big banks and the big corporations that are stealing from us left and right by stealing more of our money to bail them out.
[29:17.000 --> 29:22.000]  Well, that ain't my problem.
[29:22.000 --> 29:24.000]  Yes, it is.
[29:24.000 --> 29:28.000]  It has always been your problem.
[29:28.000 --> 29:32.000]  You just don't want the responsibility that's associated with it.
[29:32.000 --> 29:40.000]  That, folks, is why we are in the state we're in.
[29:40.000 --> 29:45.000]  The sooner you come to realize that, the better off we're all going to be.
[29:45.000 --> 29:51.000]  But I'm not going to hold my breath for any of that, unfortunately.
[29:51.000 --> 30:03.000]  All right, I got one more thing on the other side, and then I'll start taking your calls. So y'all hold on. We'll be right back.
[30:03.000 --> 30:09.000]  What do you do when a bird with a broken wing waddles into your oven and refuses to leave?
[30:09.000 --> 30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the tale of how one Austrian couple faced exactly that dilemma next.
[30:16.000 --> 30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.000 --> 30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:42.000]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:53.000]  Here's a love story from Austria that involves a taxidermist named Bertil Reiterer, his wife Ernie, and a pigeon named Susie.
[30:53.000 --> 30:57.000]  It started the day Bertil found Susie with a broken wing by the side of the road.
[30:57.000 --> 31:01.000]  He took her to a vet, then home, then set the bird up in the garage.
[31:01.000 --> 31:07.000]  But on Christmas Day, Susie waddled into the kitchen, hopped into the oven, and refused to come out.
[31:07.000 --> 31:13.000]  Rather than make pigeons stew, the couple adopted Susie and allowed the flightless bird to make a home in their oven.
[31:13.000 --> 31:20.000]  That was 17 years ago. Sure, it makes cooking tricky, they say, but their kitchen is all the warmer for it.
[31:20.000 --> 31:25.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.000 --> 31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.000 --> 31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.000 --> 31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.000 --> 31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:46.000 --> 31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[31:49.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.000 --> 31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.000 --> 31:58.000]  We are Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.000 --> 32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.000 --> 32:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.000 --> 32:10.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:17.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:17.000 --> 32:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:25.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.000 --> 32:31.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:31.000 --> 32:35.000]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.000 --> 32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:45.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.000 --> 32:51.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.000 --> 33:02.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.000 --> 33:15.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:15.000 --> 33:35.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:35.000 --> 33:41.000]  All right, listen up. We got one more case to read and then one quote to read, and then we'll get on to your taking your calls here.
[33:41.000 --> 33:47.000]  If you want to go ahead and get in line, the calling number is 512-646-1984.
[33:47.000 --> 33:56.000]  All right, now in case you didn't know, what the role of your state government actually is in relation to keeping the federal government in check as well
[33:56.000 --> 34:08.000]  is to protect your rights and property. It is not to regulate you. It is not to license you. It is not to register you or control you.
[34:08.000 --> 34:17.000]  It is there to protect your individual rights, person, and property. That's all it's there for in relation to the people.
[34:17.000 --> 34:26.000]  Now listen very carefully. Within any state of this union, the preservation of the peace and the protection of person and property
[34:26.000 --> 34:33.000]  are the functions of the state government and are not part of the primary duty at least of the nation.
[34:33.000 --> 34:42.000]  The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states,
[34:42.000 --> 34:53.000]  but have force only in the District of Columbia and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.
[34:53.000 --> 35:06.000]  That's CAHA versus United States, 152 U.S. 211 and 215 in 1894. So this concept of you stay on your side of the fence
[35:06.000 --> 35:17.000]  and we stay on ours has been around for a little bit of time. And yet we ignore it as if it's nonexistent.
[35:17.000 --> 35:24.000]  Now here's something I saw today and I could not agree with this anymore.
[35:24.000 --> 35:34.000]  And it sets the perfect tone to match up with the situations that we're facing as a nation, including what's going on up there in Oregon.
[35:34.000 --> 35:44.000]  Now we all know that every time the government wants us distracted from something, the first word out of their mouth is terrorist or terrorism.
[35:44.000 --> 35:58.000]  They use that to incite the public into granting them more powers to do more things that the public can't give them without rewriting the Constitution.
[35:58.000 --> 36:06.000]  But here we are with the states not doing their job because we aren't doing ours.
[36:06.000 --> 36:16.000]  But listen to this. I am not terrified of the terrorists, i.e. I am not myself terrorized.
[36:16.000 --> 36:28.000]  Rather, I am terrified of the terrorized, terrified of the bovine masses who are so easily manipulated by terrorists,
[36:28.000 --> 36:40.000]  governments and the terror-amplifying media into allowing our country to slip toward totalitarianism and total war.
[36:40.000 --> 36:51.000]  And Amanda said that is Dan Sanchez and he's right. I'm not afraid of ISIS or Al Qaeda or anybody else.
[36:51.000 --> 36:59.000]  I'm afraid of you people out there that think the information that shows like this are providing you,
[36:59.000 --> 37:06.000]  that we know to be true and have given you all the information necessary to verify for yourself that it's true.
[37:06.000 --> 37:17.000]  And yet you do nothing. You scare the living hell out of me because there's a lot more of you than there are of me.
[37:17.000 --> 37:28.000]  And since you believe we live in a democracy like all of those that want to take control of everything, want you to believe,
[37:28.000 --> 37:35.000]  my rights are subject to your vote by majority, right? Wrong.
[37:35.000 --> 37:41.000]  I'm terrified of you not because I think you have the power to vote away my rights.
[37:41.000 --> 37:49.000]  I'm terrified of you because I believe you're going to make things so hard for me to survive without government interference
[37:49.000 --> 37:56.000]  that I'm going to have to use arms to stop it.
[37:56.000 --> 38:05.000]  And that I may have to shoot some of you who decide to help them do what they're not allowed to do.
[38:05.000 --> 38:21.000]  It's not me wanting to harm anyone. It's me left with no choice for my own self-preservation where it comes down to it's either you or it's me.
[38:21.000 --> 38:31.000]  I don't want that. But where do we have to go if not there at the way things are right now?
[38:31.000 --> 38:42.000]  The folks up in Oregon are showing you right now. There is no other way to go with this because it didn't matter how peaceful they tried to be.
[38:42.000 --> 38:53.000]  They're set up and they're murdered by the government anyway. They didn't open fire on anybody. The government did.
[38:53.000 --> 39:03.000]  They didn't steal government land and hijack government buildings or interfere with government work because that level of government had no business being there.
[39:03.000 --> 39:11.000]  It had no authority to be there.
[39:11.000 --> 39:32.000]  But some of you up in Oregon sat in a room with your traitorous sheriff and your traitorous county commissioners and you voted that the people that were standing up to the BLM had to go.
[39:32.000 --> 39:44.000]  And you gave that sheriff the green light to sell you out right along with those protesters, whether you realize that or not.
[39:44.000 --> 39:52.000]  That is exactly what you did. You cut your own throat.
[39:52.000 --> 40:06.000]  You people just don't get it. It's back to the old adage. You're trapped in a pit with a hungry tiger, you and 10 people.
[40:06.000 --> 40:21.000]  So far you've managed to give one of those other people to the tiger every time he's gotten hungry without realizing that eventually or at least not accepting that eventually there ain't going to be anybody left to tell him no but you.
[40:21.000 --> 40:26.000]  And then what are you going to do when you're there all alone?
[40:26.000 --> 40:45.000]  When you had the chance and you outnumbered the tiger to protect yourselves by dispatching that tiger, you chose instead to sacrifice each other so the tiger would at least temporarily leave you alone.
[40:45.000 --> 40:54.000]  How stupid can you be?
[40:54.000 --> 40:59.000]  That was rhetorical, but you get the drift.
[40:59.000 --> 41:07.000]  All right, that being said, we're going to start taking your calls if we've got any up on the board. I haven't had a chance to look yet, but it looks like we do.
[41:07.000 --> 41:17.000]  All right, let's go to – well, it's hard to say. Call screener, I've got a couple people up here that I don't have any names for whatsoever, so I don't know who's who.
[41:17.000 --> 41:26.000]  Let's see if we can fix that, shall we? In the meantime, let's go to JD in Texas. JD, what do you have?
[41:26.000 --> 41:49.000]  Hey, Eddie. What you're saying, I've heard before and I've read before as it pertains to, you know, that we the people are the state, you know, not necessarily the boundaries of the political body that think they're the state, that we the people are in fact the state.
[41:49.000 --> 42:09.000]  However, I most often wondered how is it then, if that's the case, that you get a court complaint lawsuit or what have you that may say something to the effect of the state of Texas versus so-and-so, you know, will –
[42:09.000 --> 42:11.000]  Well, let me ask you this.
[42:11.000 --> 42:21.000]  Let me ask this. I don't mean to interrupt before you completely finish, but there is a bug I want to put in your ear and everyone else's while that comment you just – part of that question you just asked is fresh in everybody's mind.
[42:21.000 --> 42:22.000]  Okay.
[42:22.000 --> 42:37.000]  Instead of asking me where would be the best place in your mind to research the history of exactly that, as it applies to Texas anyway?
[42:37.000 --> 42:44.000]  The best place, probably I would say maybe looking at the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[42:44.000 --> 42:48.000]  How would the Code of Criminal Procedure have anything to do with that?
[42:48.000 --> 42:56.000]  I don't know. I just put the swag on scientific wall of something, yes, you know. Just trying to think.
[42:56.000 --> 43:07.000]  It depends on how the state constitution defines it to be done. If it's something that is defined to be done by law, then you're right. You would have to look at the legislative acts.
[43:07.000 --> 43:14.000]  But your best bet is to start with the constitutions of the state first, the original all the way up to whatever's currently in existence.
[43:14.000 --> 43:30.000]  Texas has had so many – for so many different reasons it's not even funny. But when you read them, you will see that there are huge differences between the pre-1845 and everything after that.
[43:30.000 --> 43:42.000]  For instance, Texas absolutely forbade anything even resembling eminent domain until we allegedly became a part of the United States in 1845.
[43:42.000 --> 43:48.000]  That was the first time eminent domain ever entered the picture in Texas.
[43:48.000 --> 43:53.000]  Hang on just a second, J.D., and we'll pick this up with you when we get back after this break, okay?
[43:53.000 --> 44:00.000]  All right.
[44:00.000 --> 44:15.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:22.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.000 --> 44:34.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:03.000]  Please visit lulavlogradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.000 --> 45:13.000]  Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D, here in Austin, Texas.
[45:13.000 --> 45:19.000]  I'm Brave New Books and Chase Banks to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:38.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Neem Oil, Lotion Candles, Olive Oil Soaps, and Colloidal Silver and Gold. Call 512-264-4043, or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:54.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.000 --> 46:39.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:39.000 --> 46:44.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking with JD in Texas.
[46:44.000 --> 46:47.000]  All right, JD, go ahead.
[46:47.000 --> 46:48.000]  All right.
[46:48.000 --> 46:58.000]  Well, I guess in a nutshell what I'm trying to get at, Eddie, is how is it that whenever they say the state versus a person of the state,
[46:58.000 --> 47:09.000]  basically how is it that if we are the state that basically we can't incriminate ourselves, like I sure ain't going to file charges against myself.
[47:09.000 --> 47:15.000]  I sure ain't going to, you know, arrest and imprison myself.
[47:15.000 --> 47:24.000]  But is there any kind of way that we can battle that whenever they would say on a complaint or a suit against us of some sort?
[47:24.000 --> 47:36.000]  The reason I'm going to say no in Texas is because the Constitution is what says how they will define the contents of those charging instruments as a matter of law,
[47:36.000 --> 47:40.000]  which means they can say anything the legislature wants them to say.
[47:40.000 --> 47:44.000]  They can say in and by the authority of Humpty Dumpty and the king.
[47:44.000 --> 47:50.000]  It doesn't make any difference if that's what the people authorize them to do through law.
[47:50.000 --> 47:58.000]  Now, if the state Constitution said it had to be a certain way and then it isn't, then you've got an issue.
[47:58.000 --> 48:06.000]  But when you allow the legislature to define the contents of a charging instrument in accordance with law,
[48:06.000 --> 48:13.000]  then you're authorizing them to put whatever they want in there as stating the authority.
[48:13.000 --> 48:17.000]  Okay.
[48:17.000 --> 48:18.000]  All right.
[48:18.000 --> 48:20.000]  Well, I mean, it's just like I said, I was a question.
[48:20.000 --> 48:23.000]  I often wonder then that you started talking about this this evening.
[48:23.000 --> 48:27.000]  So I figured that was a good time to, you know, was a reminder in my mind.
[48:27.000 --> 48:32.000]  It's something I needed to ask and see because it just never did seem to add up to me.
[48:32.000 --> 48:34.000]  So that's all I got, Eddie.
[48:34.000 --> 48:35.000]  I still appreciate it.
[48:35.000 --> 48:36.000]  Yeah, no problem.
[48:36.000 --> 48:37.000]  All right, man.
[48:37.000 --> 48:38.000]  All right.
[48:38.000 --> 48:39.000]  You have a good evening.
[48:39.000 --> 48:40.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[48:40.000 --> 48:41.000]  All right.
[48:41.000 --> 48:42.000]  All right.
[48:42.000 --> 48:43.000]  Thank you, too.
[48:43.000 --> 48:44.000]  All right.
[48:44.000 --> 48:48.000]  Let's go to Frank in Texas, if this thing quit moving around.
[48:48.000 --> 48:51.000]  Frank, what can we do for you?
[48:51.000 --> 48:53.000]  Hey, Eddie.
[48:53.000 --> 48:57.000]  I was on your Facebook page the other day and I sent you a message.
[48:57.000 --> 49:00.000]  I know you don't read everything, so it takes a long time.
[49:00.000 --> 49:06.000]  But I came across Anna, Judge Anna Von Reitz up in Fairbanks, Alaska.
[49:06.000 --> 49:07.000]  No, you didn't.
[49:07.000 --> 49:11.000]  You come across another Internet fiction from what I can tell.
[49:11.000 --> 49:12.000]  But go ahead.
[49:12.000 --> 49:14.000]  Well, she's got a phone number here.
[49:14.000 --> 49:15.000]  She's got a wall.
[49:15.000 --> 49:16.000]  She's got...
[49:16.000 --> 49:21.000]  Hey, Walmart's got one, too, but I'm not going to let them tell me how law works.
[49:21.000 --> 49:22.000]  Okay.
[49:22.000 --> 49:26.000]  Well, I read all of her PDFs, irrespective of what she may or may not be.
[49:26.000 --> 49:27.000]  Okay.
[49:27.000 --> 49:28.000]  She's on point.
[49:28.000 --> 49:29.000]  She points out...
[49:29.000 --> 49:30.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa.
[49:30.000 --> 49:31.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait.
[49:31.000 --> 49:35.000]  Now, I've read a lot of the stuff this so-called judge has put out there, too.
[49:35.000 --> 49:39.000]  So let me get you to clarify what you are saying about on point.
[49:39.000 --> 49:42.000]  What is on point exactly?
[49:42.000 --> 49:47.000]  She's saying exactly what you're saying about what's going up in Oregon, first of all.
[49:47.000 --> 49:48.000]  Exactly.
[49:48.000 --> 49:49.000]  Okay.
[49:49.000 --> 49:50.000]  Well, that shouldn't be hard.
[49:50.000 --> 49:51.000]  I thought you...
[49:51.000 --> 49:52.000]  Yeah?
[49:52.000 --> 49:53.000]  Okay.
[49:53.000 --> 49:54.000]  Well, she's not an idiot.
[49:54.000 --> 49:56.000]  Well, no, I'm not saying she's an idiot.
[49:56.000 --> 50:03.000]  But what else does she also say that would make you want to question what she actually is?
[50:03.000 --> 50:05.000]  Because if you're reading that part now,
[50:05.000 --> 50:08.000]  then you must have read the other things that she's talking about.
[50:08.000 --> 50:13.000]  So far, most of the stuff I have seen her put out, or whatever it is,
[50:13.000 --> 50:16.000]  whether it's a her, him, or group, I don't know.
[50:16.000 --> 50:21.000]  But most of the stuff that I have seen come out with that name on it
[50:21.000 --> 50:29.000]  is every conceivable patronut myth the Internet has coughed up for decades.
[50:29.000 --> 50:33.000]  It has been regurgitated under that name as if it's the gospel,
[50:33.000 --> 50:36.000]  when I know for a fact it's not.
[50:36.000 --> 50:37.000]  I'm not speaking to that.
[50:37.000 --> 50:38.000]  Okay.
[50:38.000 --> 50:42.000]  I'm just trying to make sure, because that name's associated with a lot.
[50:42.000 --> 50:48.000]  So I'm trying to make sure that the audience knows what part of it we're discussing.
[50:48.000 --> 50:58.000]  I'm not going to the unverifiable patronut stuff that I can't track down the origins from.
[50:58.000 --> 50:59.000]  Okay.
[50:59.000 --> 51:00.000]  All right.
[51:00.000 --> 51:01.000]  That's all I want to make sure of and let everybody know.
[51:01.000 --> 51:02.000]  Go ahead.
[51:02.000 --> 51:07.000]  Everybody needs to verify everything that they read,
[51:07.000 --> 51:14.000]  and you need to drill right down to the organic documents that it's drawn from.
[51:14.000 --> 51:17.000]  And you want to make sure it's actually there in the library.
[51:17.000 --> 51:18.000]  It's not made up.
[51:18.000 --> 51:26.000]  But anyways, as far as common law courts are concerned, they used to exist.
[51:26.000 --> 51:27.000]  Yes.
[51:27.000 --> 51:28.000]  I can gather that.
[51:28.000 --> 51:32.000]  Okay. And I know that they are still lawful.
[51:32.000 --> 51:36.000]  And I know that you can still have one in your county.
[51:36.000 --> 51:37.000]  Well, okay.
[51:37.000 --> 51:38.000]  Hold on just a second.
[51:38.000 --> 51:39.000]  Hold on just a second.
[51:39.000 --> 51:45.000]  On what are you basing the statement that they are still lawful?
[51:45.000 --> 51:52.000]  Because they go by the original Constitution, which has never been repealed.
[51:52.000 --> 51:53.000]  Okay.
[51:53.000 --> 51:56.000]  Which original Constitution?
[51:56.000 --> 52:01.000]  The first Constitution, one with the original documents from Magna Carta
[52:01.000 --> 52:02.000]  and the Declaration of Independence.
[52:02.000 --> 52:05.000]  Which Constitution?
[52:05.000 --> 52:08.000]  The Constitution for the United States of America.
[52:08.000 --> 52:09.000]  Okay.
[52:09.000 --> 52:12.000]  That's got nothing to do with us.
[52:12.000 --> 52:14.000]  I didn't say it did.
[52:14.000 --> 52:15.000]  Okay.
[52:15.000 --> 52:19.000]  But you're referencing it as if it has some bearing on the discussion about the people
[52:19.000 --> 52:20.000]  of the states.
[52:20.000 --> 52:21.000]  It doesn't.
[52:21.000 --> 52:23.000]  It wasn't written for us.
[52:23.000 --> 52:26.000]  It's directed at the employees.
[52:26.000 --> 52:27.000]  Okay.
[52:27.000 --> 52:28.000]  Right?
[52:28.000 --> 52:37.000]  Now, if we become employees for the People's Court, then we go by that Constitution.
[52:37.000 --> 52:38.000]  Okay.
[52:38.000 --> 52:44.000]  But the problem here about what you're talking about is everything in that Constitution is
[52:44.000 --> 52:45.000]  federal.
[52:45.000 --> 52:51.000]  So any common law court reference that you're making would all have to be federal, wouldn't
[52:51.000 --> 52:54.000]  have anything to do within the states.
[52:54.000 --> 52:58.000]  So is there an organic state Constitution for Texas?
[52:58.000 --> 52:59.000]  Yeah.
[52:59.000 --> 53:05.000]  The 1836 is the one that we had after the 1824 when we had the war with Mexico and became
[53:05.000 --> 53:07.000]  an independent sovereign nation.
[53:07.000 --> 53:12.000]  The 1836 is the organic Texas Constitution.
[53:12.000 --> 53:14.000]  And that's what I want to know.
[53:14.000 --> 53:18.000]  Does Texas allow for common law courts?
[53:18.000 --> 53:26.000]  Well, the question here becomes is regardless of what a Constitution did allow, if a Constitution
[53:26.000 --> 53:29.000]  has been properly amended, and Texas hasn't, don't get me wrong.
[53:29.000 --> 53:31.000]  I'm not trying to go that route for Texas.
[53:31.000 --> 53:35.000]  But across the board, you can't make the general statement that this is true everywhere because
[53:35.000 --> 53:36.000]  it isn't.
[53:36.000 --> 53:37.000]  No.
[53:37.000 --> 53:44.000]  In a state where the people have lawfully amended that Constitution to remove this power,
[53:44.000 --> 53:50.000]  that power, whatever, from the bodies acting in a governmental capacity, which we juries
[53:50.000 --> 53:56.000]  are, they're there to ensure that the governmental power is properly exercised to punish those
[53:56.000 --> 54:04.000]  that cause harm, then even though the jury isn't government themselves, that's a power
[54:04.000 --> 54:07.000]  that supersedes what everybody else in government would do.
[54:07.000 --> 54:09.000]  You follow what I'm saying?
[54:09.000 --> 54:10.000]  Right.
[54:10.000 --> 54:15.000]  Because it specifically granted them by the Constitution, so the government can't prevent
[54:15.000 --> 54:18.000]  them from exercising it.
[54:18.000 --> 54:23.000]  I know that in New York, I'm not talking that we're going to discuss New York, but I just
[54:23.000 --> 54:28.000]  want to say I know in New York, if you go on the government's website, it's right across
[54:28.000 --> 54:31.000]  the top page, Common Law Rules.
[54:31.000 --> 54:32.000]  Okay.
[54:32.000 --> 54:37.000]  Now, that's a statement that could be deceptive or whatever, or could mean something else.
[54:37.000 --> 54:40.000]  But I'm talking about Texas now.
[54:40.000 --> 54:47.000]  Have we done any research that we can open a common law court, not competing with the
[54:47.000 --> 54:55.000]  Admiralty Common Law, but as an option to take some cases or remove some cases from
[54:55.000 --> 55:08.000]  the court, if it's all party degree, to abide by a people's court and start driving the
[55:08.000 --> 55:18.000]  business demand down for the mishandled and actually, I don't believe that the Admiralty
[55:18.000 --> 55:22.000]  Common Law courts here are doing the right thing anyway.
[55:22.000 --> 55:29.000]  Well, in answer to your question, the Texas Constitution as it exists right now, the 1876
[55:29.000 --> 55:34.000]  specifically sets up a grand jury formed by the district court.
[55:34.000 --> 55:40.000]  The only thing within the Constitution that could be used to facilitate a common law grand
[55:40.000 --> 55:44.000]  jury would be the provisions in the Bill of Rights where the people are authorized to
[55:44.000 --> 55:51.000]  reform, abolish, or do whatever is necessary to fix a broken government.
[55:51.000 --> 55:54.000]  It doesn't say how many of the people are required to do it.
[55:54.000 --> 55:57.000]  It doesn't give them a voting requirement to do it.
[55:57.000 --> 56:00.000]  It doesn't do any of that.
[56:00.000 --> 56:06.000]  But whatever you do, the way that it's worded and the way that I read it is that it would
[56:06.000 --> 56:11.000]  have to be a solution that the people as a whole would be willing to accept and put into
[56:11.000 --> 56:16.000]  place in place of what currently is written.
[56:16.000 --> 56:17.000]  In the county?
[56:17.000 --> 56:21.000]  No, the Constitution doesn't bind a single county.
[56:21.000 --> 56:24.000]  It binds them all.
[56:24.000 --> 56:25.000]  Okay?
[56:25.000 --> 56:29.000]  There's nothing in there that makes separate government for the counties other than their
[56:29.000 --> 56:32.000]  local conditions.
[56:32.000 --> 56:36.000]  So if we wanted to set one up in Austin, for instance, and we did all the research and
[56:36.000 --> 56:44.000]  we jumped through all of the proper things, gathered enough competent people, which is
[56:44.000 --> 56:53.000]  hard to do, but nonetheless, if we just started working on this, would it be a way to kind
[56:53.000 --> 56:57.000]  of move them off the land a little bit?
[56:57.000 --> 57:00.000]  No, because that will never be allowed to happen.
[57:00.000 --> 57:02.000]  The people will never support it.
[57:02.000 --> 57:04.000]  It's not definitive enough for them.
[57:04.000 --> 57:09.000]  What you would have to do, in my opinion, in order to make something like that work,
[57:09.000 --> 57:15.000]  is you would have to do a constitutional amendment that establishes two specific grand juries.
[57:15.000 --> 57:21.000]  One grand jury's sole purpose is to take information and use it to hand down indictments
[57:21.000 --> 57:27.000]  for criminal actions by individuals, and then you have a separate grand jury whose sole
[57:27.000 --> 57:33.000]  job is to go after public servants who violate any provision of the Constitution or the laws
[57:33.000 --> 57:35.000]  of Texas itself.
[57:35.000 --> 57:40.000]  Now, you want to see the number of laws in Texas disappear at a rapid rate?
[57:40.000 --> 57:44.000]  Let some public servant realize that he's finally going to suffer consequences for
[57:44.000 --> 57:49.000]  breaking a stupid law he got put into place last year, and suddenly he's going to want
[57:49.000 --> 57:51.000]  it repealed.
[57:51.000 --> 57:57.000]  Okay, so wherever a common law court could exist, that would be a good idea, but I don't
[57:57.000 --> 57:59.000]  think it's going to happen here.
[57:59.000 --> 58:00.000]  Is that what you're saying?
[58:00.000 --> 58:05.000]  The problem you have with a common law court is investing it with the power to uphold its
[58:05.000 --> 58:08.000]  verdicts, whatever they may be.
[58:08.000 --> 58:09.000]  Okay?
[58:09.000 --> 58:14.000]  Without the support of the people establishing that court in place of what is here, it's
[58:14.000 --> 58:20.000]  not going to happen, and the powers of the state will act to crush you and everyone involved,
[58:20.000 --> 58:25.000]  because there's nothing that gives you power while it gives it all to them.
[58:25.000 --> 58:30.000]  So you're going to hit them in the pocketbook at this point?
[58:30.000 --> 58:31.000]  No, it's not about the pocketbook.
[58:31.000 --> 58:35.000]  They're not going to do it because it's a relinquishment of power, and they're not
[58:35.000 --> 58:38.000]  about giving up power, ever.
[58:38.000 --> 58:42.000]  Okay, so I'm going to talk to...
[58:42.000 --> 58:43.000]  All right, well hang on.
[58:43.000 --> 58:44.000]  I've got to take a break.
[58:44.000 --> 58:45.000]  We'll finish this on the other side.
[58:45.000 --> 58:48.000]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984.
[58:48.000 --> 58:50.000]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:56.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:56.000 --> 58:58.000]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:04.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.000 --> 59:07.000]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:15.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:15.000 --> 59:18.000]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:24.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:24.000 --> 59:28.000]  into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:44.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:01.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:06.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your deli
[01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:13.000]  bulletins for the commodities market, Today in History, News Updates, and the inside scoop
[01:00:13.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:25.000]  Markets for Wednesday, the 3rd of February, 2016, are currently treading with gold at
[01:00:25.000 --> 01:00:33.000]  $1,138.10 an ounce, silver at $14.63 an ounce, Texas crude at $29.88 a barrel,
[01:00:33.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $370 U.S. currency.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Today in history, the year 1966, the Luna 9 Russian spacecraft became the first unmanned
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:54.000]  probe to achieve a soft landing on the moon, or any other planetary body for that matter.
[01:00:54.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  Also known as the Y-E6 No. 13, it was the first probe to transmit photographic data
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  to Earth from the lunar surface.
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  In recent news, Sandra Merritt, one of the two indicted with tampering with governmental
[01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:14.000]  documents in order to create fake driver's license and a plot with anti-abortion activists
[01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  to obtain the undercover video footage exposing Planned Parenthood for selling human body
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  parts, turned herself in to Texas authorities today.
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  She posted her $2,000 bond and was later released.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:29.000]  However, the news conference that she was scheduled to hold afterwards was canceled.
[01:01:29.000 --> 01:01:33.000]  David Daley-Iden, the main activist behind the videos, plans to turn himself over to
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  authorities tomorrow, his attorneys have stated.
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  He does ironically face an additional misdemeanor charge related to the purchase of human tissue.
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:45.000]  Ironic because, if you recall, a grand jury in Houston, Texas that had been tasked with
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  looking into the wrongdoing by Planned Parenthood announced that it was indicting Daley-Iden
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  and Merritt instead.
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  The results for the Iowa caucus are as follows.
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:04.000]  For the Republican Party, Ted Cruz, eight delegates, or 27.7 percent.
[01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:08.000]  Donald Trump, seven delegates, or 24.3 percent.
[01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:11.000]  Mark Rubio, seven delegates, 23.1 percent.
[01:02:11.000 --> 01:02:14.000]  Ben Carson, three delegates, or 9.3 percent.
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:20.000]  Rand Paul, one delegate, 8,481 votes, 4.1 percent.
[01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:25.000]  Officially, Rand Paul did drop out this morning, stating the lack of funds and support as his
[01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  main cause.
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:29.000]  Jeb Bush, one delegate, at 2.8 percent.
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:32.000]  Carly Farina, one delegate, 1.9 percent.
[01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:36.000]  And John Kasich, one delegate, at 1.9 percent.
[01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:41.000]  For the Democrats, it was actually decided by a coin toss which gave Hillary six wins out of
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  six tosses.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:50.000]  Hillary Clinton got 23 delegates and Bernie Sanders 21 delegates.
[01:02:50.000 --> 01:03:05.000]  This has been your Lowdown for February 3rd, 2016.
[01:03:05.000 --> 01:03:20.000]  Thank you.
[01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:35.000]  Thank you.
[01:03:35.000 --> 01:03:50.000]  Thank you.
[01:03:50.000 --> 01:04:05.000]  Thank you.
[01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:22.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call-in number 512-646-1984.
[01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:24.000]  We are talking with Frank in Texas.
[01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:27.000]  All right, Frank, please continue.
[01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:31.000]  Okay, so I'm on her site at danavonreach.com.
[01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:46.000]  All the documents that she offers, there's 167 separate PDFs.
[01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  Download them all, read them all up, discard anything that you don't understand and go to the next
[01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  thing.
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:58.000]  But there's some – I've read them all and once – I'm going to read them again.
[01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  I'm going to take notes.
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:07.000]  I'm going to drill down whatever is pertinent and I'm going to alert you if I find something you
[01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  could use.
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:09.000]  Okay.
[01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  But anyways, I'm going to alert you on your Facebook and I'm going to put danavonreach
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  in a message to you personally to look at it because I'm not going to –
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  Well, someone using that name actually sent me a friend request up here, but after reading a
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:32.000]  lot of this stuff, I don't – I'm not going to promote that when I know it to be wrong, so I didn't
[01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:37.000]  accept the friend request simply so that they could start posting all over my timeline or my group.
[01:05:37.000 --> 01:05:38.000]  No.
[01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  She's a real lady.
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  She's a real lady, I believe, because I've been – I got Taryn Huda's cell number.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  She worked at the World Bank and I wanted to get her on Randy's show to drill down into her bullshit.
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:57.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:05:57.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  Watch the language.
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  I'm sorry about the language.
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  Yeah.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  Well, you're not going to be nearly as sorry as if Debra hears it and comes after you.
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  Believe me.
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:08.000]  I'm sorry, Debra.
[01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  She really – she was handing us a bunch of misinformation from the World Bank because
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:20.000]  she's a lawyer and she was real nice about it.
[01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  And so I decided to let Randy feed her up, and he didn't want to do it.
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  So I was like, okay, let me take another attack.
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:36.000]  So I started looking at her correspondence between her and Anna Von Reitz, and Anna Von Reitz
[01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  put her to bed.
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  She just like destroyed her.
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  Exposed her as a shill for the banks trying to reset the economy and get us right back
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:50.000]  into the same crap that they started before.
[01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:51.000]  Okay?
[01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  She caught her.
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  And she did a really good job.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  You've got to see some of this stuff.
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:06:58.000]  She just killed her.
[01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  And the boy was – she just shut up.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:02.000]  She didn't even come back.
[01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  So Anna Von Reitz is a real lady with a lot of – with a lot of knowledge, and she basically
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:13.000]  put the World Bank attorney to bed naming all of the things that she should already
[01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  know.
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:18.000]  And she tried everything in the book to discredit her.
[01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:21.000]  She told her, well, you worked for the Vatican and all this.
[01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:27.000]  Well, she tried – and then she came back with a perfect poise and just beat her to
[01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:28.000]  death.
[01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:31.000]  And now she's not even talking to her anymore.
[01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:39.000]  Basically, you've got to see this – there's six rounds of back and forth that went back
[01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  and forth between these two people.
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  And Anna Von Reitz really stuck to the – her guns, and she beat her up pretty bad.
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:48.000]  And she used the law.
[01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:51.000]  So basically, this lady is very educated.
[01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:56.000]  Whatever – and I'm not talking about what's posted outside of her site.
[01:07:56.000 --> 01:07:58.000]  Only what's on her site, the AnnaVonReitz.com.
[01:07:58.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  Read that only.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  Don't go outside, because I'm sure they're trying to discredit her.
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  Put her in the patron-up community and whatever else.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:11.000]  She doesn't go anywhere beyond what she can explain by law.
[01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:13.000]  And I'm going to confirm that.
[01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  So I'm not – I'm not done yet, but let me confirm that.
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:24.000]  And I'll give you some important stuff that you might be able to use in your suit against
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:25.000]  these people.
[01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:26.000]  Okay.
[01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:28.000]  We call our government.
[01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  I'm going to send you a couple of really good tidbits, because I read through them,
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:33.000]  but I didn't note them.
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  So I have to go through all of them again, because I thought this was total bull.
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:39.000]  But it wasn't.
[01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  It really – she caught my eye really hard.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:47.000]  And I'm going to even give her a call, because she puts her phone number up here.
[01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  And she's got a couple of books on Amazon.
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  Okay.
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:55.000]  So everything is on paper.
[01:08:55.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  You know, there's nothing that – if you get anybody writing outside of her name that
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  she didn't sign it, don't bother.
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  It's just this lady is very educated.
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  She blew my mind.
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  And I've been studying law as long as – you know how long I've been talking real
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  – at least five years.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:16.000]  You know, I've been studying every day.
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  And I've been spreading your – what you're doing and trying to get people in your class
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  and trying to get, you know, people who actually are fed up, you know, with motivation, trying
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:31.000]  to get them into your class and, you know, make time for this.
[01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:37.000]  I'm basically working my butt off here on the street.
[01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:45.000]  So I'm on – I'm not a patron up, but I don't take crap and I, you know, I don't
[01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:49.000]  take – I know how to handle judges a lot better, thanks to you.
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:51.000]  I went to your class many times.
[01:09:51.000 --> 01:09:53.000]  Glad to be of help.
[01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:54.000]  Yeah.
[01:09:54.000 --> 01:09:57.000]  And I'll probably end up back there again.
[01:09:57.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  Sammy is doing good.
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  Number Sammy?
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  Uh-huh.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  She's still very frisky.
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  She got over what she had and she's 12 now.
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:09.000]  So I'll be seeing you again.
[01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  Okay.
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:11.000]  And thanks a lot.
[01:10:11.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:13.000]  No problem.
[01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:14.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  All right.
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  Now our next caller is Jeff in Mississippi.
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  Jeff, what do you got?
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:25.000]  Hey, Andy, thanks for – Eddie, thanks for having me on the show.
[01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  Sure.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  If you quit calling me Andy, you'll get to come back.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:30.000]  I apologize.
[01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  I don't know where that came from.
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:32.000]  I've got a cat in there.
[01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:33.000]  I've got –
[01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:35.000]  Ah, you're thinking of Andy Griffin, probably.
[01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:36.000]  Yeah.
[01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  Oh, definitely.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  Well, I'm doing a Title 42, 1983 complaint and I'm trying to get this thing typed up.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:49.000]  I am not suing a city – the city police or a city policeman.
[01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:54.000]  I was arrested by an officer of the sheriff, the county sheriff.
[01:10:54.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  So in my complaint, I'm trying to figure out how to list – if an officer of the sheriff's
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  department arrested me and put me in jail, I wrote an email to Randy asking him how to
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  list that as the defendant.
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:18.000]  And his answer is if you're suing the sheriff's department, then name the sheriff himself.
[01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:23.000]  If you're suing the county, then name the county judge of the commissioner's court.
[01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:26.000]  Now, my first question is I don't know who I would be suing.
[01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:32.000]  If I got arrested by Barney Fife of the county sheriff's department and I just went to jail,
[01:11:32.000 --> 01:11:35.000]  that would be the first question and then the second.
[01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:43.000]  You would sue the person that initially seized you, his agency, and then any other agencies
[01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:48.000]  or individuals that assisted in maintaining his seizure.
[01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:51.000]  Okay.
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:57.000]  And would that be the judge that I was taken in front of who held me?
[01:11:57.000 --> 01:12:03.000]  Well, that depends what was given to the judge in order for him to hold you.
[01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:07.000]  If he was lied to, that's not his fault.
[01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:12.000]  And if he was acting with proper jurisdiction, you couldn't touch him anyway.
[01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:14.000]  All right.
[01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:17.000]  Well, I guess it's just the officer then.
[01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:20.000]  He just took me to the jail and I was just held there.
[01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  No.
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  That would also involve the jail facility and the jailers themselves.
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:30.000]  Okay.
[01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:35.000]  So the second part of that question is Randy had said if you're suing the county,
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:40.000]  you can name a county judge of the commissioner's court.
[01:12:40.000 --> 01:12:45.000]  Now, I'm on the Sebastian County website and I don't see anything that looks like that.
[01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:50.000]  I see circuit judges and I do see a county judge, a David Hudson per county.
[01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:51.000]  No, no, no.
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  You sue the county.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  You sue the county of and you serve the county commissioners.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:12:59.000]  Okay.
[01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  I don't see a county commissioner, but they are called county commissioners.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:04.000]  Well, in Texas they are.
[01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:09.000]  And there's a group of them that's called the county commissioner's court.
[01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:16.000]  And they're basically the same thing for the county that city council is for a municipality.
[01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  Okay.
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  Yeah, I don't see that, so I'm going to have to study that.
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  Okay.
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  We do not have that listed.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:27.000]  Okay.
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:32.000]  So in that case then I'm going to go ahead and sue the county.
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:41.000]  Would that go to the, for the address, would that be listed, would you list that under the county courthouse?
[01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:50.000]  You would find out where the county commissioner's court or whatever the top level entity is for that county receives their mail.
[01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  And that's where you perform service.
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:54.000]  That's where you do it.
[01:13:54.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  You can serve any member of that and perform service.
[01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  Okay.
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  Okay, I'll get on it.
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  That was the big question.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:06.000]  You just answered it.
[01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:07.000]  I got a little bit of work to do.
[01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  All right.
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:09.000]  Good luck.
[01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  I'll let you go.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:11.000]  Thank you.
[01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:12.000]  Thanks a lot.
[01:14:12.000 --> 01:14:13.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:14.000]  You have a good night.
[01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:15.000]  Thanks for calling.
[01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:16.000]  Okay.
[01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  You too.
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:18.000]  All right.
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:19.000]  Now we're going to go to Larry in Arizona.
[01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  Larry, what do you got?
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:21.000]  Good evening, Eddie.
[01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:22.000]  Good evening.
[01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:23.000]  I just have a few questions.
[01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  We had a trial today.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  A trial regarding?
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:33.000]  Very interesting.
[01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:36.000]  They combined two trials for me.
[01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:41.000]  One was for no registration, no insurance.
[01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:46.000]  The other trial was for no registration, failing to provide ID.
[01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:47.000]  Okay.
[01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:52.000]  But what was interesting is I had a lot of supporters show up today.
[01:14:52.000 --> 01:15:00.000]  And when the trial started and the judge comes in and they do the all rise, two of them refused to rise.
[01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:04.000]  And boy, the judge was hostile.
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:05.000]  Okay.
[01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  And, you know, finally coerced them into getting up.
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:11.000]  Now at the end of the proceedings...
[01:15:11.000 --> 01:15:17.000]  Let me give you a little hint on the best way to avoid that, religious objection.
[01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:22.000]  Judge, it is against my religion to pay homage to any human being.
[01:15:22.000 --> 01:15:25.000]  I pay homage only to God and no one else.
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:30.000]  If you want to walk into this room waving a Bible over your head, I will stand for the Bible.
[01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  But I will not pay homage to you.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  Oh, that's why I called you, Eddie.
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  I mean, you have the right answers.
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  Well, that's how that tradition got started.
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:45.000]  When judges used to come into the courtrooms, they always came in with the Bible above their head
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:49.000]  because it was the authority in that court.
[01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:54.000]  No law of man was allowed to supersede that of what was in the Bible.
[01:15:54.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  So the judge always walked in with that as well as his law book.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  But that was the one that was held high.
[01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:02.000]  That's what everyone stood for.
[01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  It wasn't the judge and it wasn't the judge's book.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:12.000]  Okay.
[01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:16.000]  So we got down to the point where I'm questioning the deputy that arrested me
[01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  and I questioned why he took me to jail instead of following the state statute
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:25.000]  that says I'll go to the magistrate.
[01:16:25.000 --> 01:16:33.000]  And he testified under oath there's not a law enforcement agency in our county that does that.
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  It's policy to take you directly to jail and let the magistrate do a video appearance.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  Okay.
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  But policy can't supersede law, can it?
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  Well, I...
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  Hang on just a second, Larry, and we'll pick that up on the other side.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:54.000]  We got to take this break.
[01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:16:57.000]  Y'all hang on.
[01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  They took our guns!
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:07.000]  Then get them back and support the Logos Radio Network at the same time.
[01:17:07.000 --> 01:17:12.000]  The following sponsors have stepped up to help keep this network on air with a fundraising contest.
[01:17:12.000 --> 01:17:17.000]  Thanks to Central Texas Gunworks with the first prize, the Spike Skull Lower Receiver.
[01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:20.000]  Second prize, the Taurus Curve Handgun.
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:23.000]  Every $25 donation gets a chance to win.
[01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  Enter as often as you like.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:26.000]  Check out centraltexasgunworks.com.
[01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:29.000]  Thanks also to mymagicmod.com.
[01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  The first 40 people to donate $25 get a jar of My Magic Mud valued at $25.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  Thanks also to All About Vapor at 4631 Airport Boulevard.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  The 10 third place winners will get a $25 gift card.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:46.000]  Stop smelling like a butt at allaboutvapor.com.
[01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:53.000]  Also, thanks to Eddie Craig, folks who buy the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar, get 10 entries into the contest.
[01:17:53.000 --> 01:17:57.000]  Check out the contest rules and details at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:17:57.000 --> 01:18:01.000]  Peristase or hipsters may not actually close with weed.
[01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  Chances are you've heard of My Magic Mud, but have you used it?
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:10.000]  Thousands of people are blown away by the clean and healthy feeling they experience after just one use.
[01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:14.000]  Here's what Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, has to say about the product.
[01:18:14.000 --> 01:18:17.000]  Hey everybody, this is Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books.
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:19.000]  Just want to tell everybody about My Magic Mud.
[01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  I use the product and it makes my teeth feel clean and healthy.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  I think it makes them stronger.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:26.000]  I got lots of customers that come in and say the same thing.
[01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:28.000]  You can pick yours up at Brave New Books.
[01:18:28.000 --> 01:18:34.000]  If that wasn't enough, Dr. Griffin Cole, DDS, who's been featured on The Alex Jones Show, loves it too.
[01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:38.000]  Hi, I'm Dr. Griffin Cole, and I got to tell you, I really love this Magic Mud product.
[01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  Because charcoal is so absorbent, it's very effective at taking off all the sticky plaque and debris that gets stuck on our teeth every day.
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  I highly recommend My Magic Mud.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  If you haven't yet experienced My Magic Mud, it's never too late to brighten your smile and strengthen your teeth.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:57.000]  Get your jar of My Magic Mud today at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street,
[01:18:57.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  or order online today at MyMagicMud.com.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:23.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:20:00.000]  All right, folks.
[01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:01.000]  We are back.
[01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking with Larry in Arizona.
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:09.000]  All right, Larry, please continue.
[01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:15.000]  You were just describing to me how policy cannot overcome state law.
[01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:18.000]  Yeah, policy cannot supersede law.
[01:20:18.000 --> 01:20:29.000]  What he confessed to on the stand was that the police department has deliberately created a policy that violates law.
[01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:31.000]  And then what you do is you get them to testify.
[01:20:31.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  So, officer, is it your testimony here today that you know for a fact that your policy violates state law and what it compels you to do?
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  Get that into the record and watch them all cry on appeal.
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  Okay.
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:21:01.000]  And then afterwards, after the questioning, the judge came into it, and the judge said,
[01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  we do this for the benefit of the county because it's...
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:10.000]  Again, the benefit of the county does not supersede the law.
[01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:16.000]  The judge nor the county can rewrite for their own convenience the law.
[01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:25.000]  They cannot waive the rights of the accused for their convenience.
[01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:33.000]  And here's the reason they have a problem with exactly what they're telling you they're doing at a Supreme Court level.
[01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:40.000]  A warrantless arrest is by default an unlawful arrest.
[01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:50.000]  The only person qualified in any state to determine probable cause for a warrantless arrest is a magistrate.
[01:21:50.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  A person arrested without a warrant must have proof put against them that the arrest was necessary.
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:04.000]  And only a magistrate can make that determination.
[01:22:04.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  The cop can't do it, and they can't hold you in jail until it's convenient for someone to ask you.
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:24.000]  Hence the reason they're required to take you immediately before a magistrate so that an innocent person is not incarcerated.
[01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:29.000]  So their convenience, yeah, I know why they want to tell you they're doing it,
[01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  but what they're telling you is we're going to do what we want regardless of what the law says because of how we want things to work.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  That's making them ripe for a Title 42 lawsuit right there.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  Okay, well, I was going to say there's been two of us arrested, you know, in the last few months.
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  So where do we do about it? How do we fight it?
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  I guarantee you if you look in the court decisions for where you live,
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:23:06.000]  you will find a ton of them that says an officer that fails to take an individual arrested without a warrant before a magistrate is committing false imprisonment or false arrest,
[01:23:06.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  whatever it may be in your state.
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  Here it's false imprisonment.
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:22.000]  There are tons of court cases in Texas that said that officer had a duty to take them before a magistrate when they arrested them without a warrant.
[01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  So their policy doesn't mean a damn thing if it runs counter to law and rights.
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:33.000]  Okay.
[01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:39.000]  Okay, and then my next situation was is that they dropped the criminal charge.
[01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  You know, they said, you don't have any registration.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:43.000]  I told the judge, I said, you're right.
[01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:46.000]  I said, I refuse to register my truck.
[01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:51.000]  And he said, well, you know, you need to show proof of insurance.
[01:23:51.000 --> 01:23:53.000]  He said, did you bring it with you today?
[01:23:53.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  I said, no, I didn't.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:23:56.000]  I said, the judge, I'm insured.
[01:23:56.000 --> 01:23:57.000]  Oh, wait a minute.
[01:23:57.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:23:59.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  All right, Larry, I'm going to beat you up a little bit here now.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:03.000]  Okay, that's fine.
[01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  That's what I'm here for.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:06.000]  So listen carefully.
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:11.000]  Repeat what you said the judge told you.
[01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  He told me that he asked me if I brought the proof of insurance.
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:16.000]  No, no, no.
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:18.000]  Just tell me exactly the way he told you.
[01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:24.000]  You're going to be the judge, I'm going to be you.
[01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:31.000]  Okay, he said, he asked me if I brought in proof of insurance.
[01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  I said, no.
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  You know, he said, I told him, I said.
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:35.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  You stay insured.
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:38.000]  Larry, you're doing it wrong.
[01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  Just say what the judge said.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  Nothing else.
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:44.000]  What did the judge say?
[01:24:44.000 --> 01:24:48.000]  The judge asked me if I brought my proof of insurance, I said, no.
[01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:49.000]  He said.
[01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  So you've never been in a school play, have you, Larry?
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:24:56.000]  No.
[01:24:56.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  Okay, you don't read the script and all the scenes from the script.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:03.000]  You just read your line.
[01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  You don't read the part where it says, Bob enters the room, okay?
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  Oh, oh, oh, okay.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  What did the judge say?
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:13.000]  That's your line.
[01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  Stick to the line.
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  What did he say?
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:22.000]  Did you bring in your proof of insurance today?
[01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  Objection, Judge.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  Is it your assertion that the burden of proof has been shifted from the state
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:32.000]  to the accused so that I am now required to prove my innocence by admission of
[01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:42.000]  evidence rather than the burden of proof remaining on the state where it belongs?
[01:25:42.000 --> 01:25:45.000]  Eddie, we need to clone you and have a lot of little pockets.
[01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:49.000]  What the hell do you think I do this show for?
[01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  I know, but doing the verbiage when you're in court under pressure, it just doesn't,
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:26:00.000]  you know, it just doesn't come to me that well.
[01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  Okay, so I have to see the judge again in two weeks.
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  So I can tell him that.
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:06.000]  Well, let me ask you this.
[01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:09.000]  Did they conclude the trial today?
[01:26:09.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  No, they postponed it, and I'm supposed to get my, what do they call it when you,
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:18.000]  you know, the final verdict is in two weeks.
[01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  They postponed it until you bring it in, right?
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:23.000]  Yes.
[01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  Okay, there's two problems with what the judge is telling you, and every state
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:28.000]  statute does it exactly the same way.
[01:26:28.000 --> 01:26:30.000]  Texas does exactly the same thing.
[01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  The statute needs to be challenged on a constitutional basis for two reasons.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  One, it compels the waiver of the protected right to remain silent.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  You are being compelled to provide them with documentation that can be used
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:49.000]  against you in a court of law or to potentially incriminate you in other ways.
[01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  Then the statute says if you fail to do that, you are presumed to be guilty of
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  violating the statute, right?
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:00.000]  Does that statute say that?
[01:27:00.000 --> 01:27:01.000]  Yes.
[01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  Okay, now they are presuming guilt over innocence in a criminal matter,
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:09.000]  something else they cannot do.
[01:27:09.000 --> 01:27:15.000]  You are presumed innocent until you are proven guilty, not the other way around,
[01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  and the statute can't change that, but that's exactly what it's trying to do.
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  And then it goes on to say, or says prior to that statement, that if the accused
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  fails to provide evidence that they had proper coverage, they shall be presumed
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:36.000]  to be in violation of this statute.
[01:27:36.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  Am I correct?
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:39.000]  Yes.
[01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:44.000]  That language is what shifts the burden of proof from the state to the accused,
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:48.000]  which is also forbidden in a criminal charge.
[01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:52.000]  So you have three, due process four, actually.
[01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  The fourth one is that your refusal to not waive your Fifth Amendment right
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  and your Fourth Amendment right is now being criminalized, and they're charging
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:09.000]  you with an additional crime for invoking and exercising those rights.
[01:28:09.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  So you have four due process violations in that single statute right off the bat.
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  Because they're unconstitutional, you can challenge them as being unconstitutional
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:32.000]  and therefore deprive the court of jurisdiction from the very beginning.
[01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  Thus, it doesn't matter what the judge has already ruled.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  It's a moot point.
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  Eddie, okay, this is great.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  That's why I called you.
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  This is my first trial, and I just don't have the experience to...
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  Yeah, the first thing comes about reading the statute.
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  This is the whole reason why I tell people read the statute.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:07.000]  But the problem with even reading the statute is if you have no clue what your rights are,
[01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  reading the statute isn't going to help you because you won't see what I see when I read it.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:21.000]  Those four rights violations, did you notice them?
[01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:28.000]  It appears that something is obviously wrong, but did I pick up on which rights?
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:29.000]  No, I didn't.
[01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  Exactly, and that is the problem.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  Most people don't know their rights in order to understand how these statutes are written to violate them,
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  and that's where they get you.
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  You're absolutely right.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  All right, Larry, you got anything else for us?
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  Yeah, I have two other quick questions.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:56.000]  Okay, well hang on, and we'll get you on the other side of this break before we get ready to wrap all this up.
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:29:57.000]  Okay.
[01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:01.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back, so y'all hang in there.
[01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  Hey, wipe that grin off your face.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:09.000]  States across the U.S. are officially forbidding people from smiling when they get their driver's license photos taken.
[01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:14.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back to tell you why the long faces of the DMV, next.
[01:30:14.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:20.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again,
[01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  and once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:30.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:30.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:36.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:40.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:44.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  If you're applying for a driver's license in a growing number of U.S. states, don't even think about smiling.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:54.000]  A big grin in your photo is now considered illegal.
[01:30:54.000 --> 01:31:00.000]  That's because smiling defeats the software they use to map and measure people's features for facial recognition.
[01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  Officials say they're preventing identity theft by comparing new license photos with existing ones.
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  But of course, once they've got your scowling mug in their database, they can use it to track you.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:17.000]  All police need to ID you in a public place is to snap your picture on the street and compare it against what's on file.
[01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  How long does that take? The answer? One second.
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:26.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:26.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:47.000]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to buildingwatch.org, why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:18.000]  and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:32:18.000 --> 01:32:24.000]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:32:24.000 --> 01:32:28.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:31.000]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:36.000]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand
[01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  that hemp protein powder is the best-kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory,
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:49.000]  non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  Only at hempUSA.org.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:13.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:17.000]  Yeah, who you want to chip? Who you take me for? Free Tully?
[01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:21.000]  Who you want to chip? Me no free Tully. You can't chip me.
[01:33:21.000 --> 01:33:22.000]  HempUSA.
[01:33:22.000 --> 01:33:25.000]  Don't let them chip you in the morning, chip you in the evening.
[01:33:25.000 --> 01:33:29.000]  Put a chip in your body, and then when you go computer reading,
[01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:31.000]  you can't hide me except I'm nobody.
[01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:37.000]  When me say chip in your mom, chip in your daddy, chip in your grandpa and the granny,
[01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  chip in me, chip in your baby, chip in your family, whole family,
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  chip in your dog.
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:45.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:49.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are still talking with Larry in Arizona.
[01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  All right, Larry, go ahead.
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:56.000]  Okay, and just quickly, who decides what the amount of fines are in a state?
[01:33:56.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  The statute does according to how the legislature put it up there.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  They can assign it any degree they want,
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  but the only thing the court can determine outside of the statute are court costs.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:12.000]  But then, well, I take that back.
[01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:17.000]  Here in Texas, the Code of Criminal Procedure under Title II contains all of the individual costs
[01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  a court is allowed to assess an individual that goes on trial there.
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  They cannot charge you one penny more than what is in the statute,
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  and they cannot charge you for anything they did not actually do.
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  Most of the court fees that are being collected in Texas are absolutely illegal.
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:41.000]  They don't comply with Title II of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:48.000]  So you need to see what statute defines what fees the court can collect outside of the fine itself,
[01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  as well as the fine.
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:58.000]  But generally, where the offense is defined, there will be either a general fine amount
[01:34:58.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  or there will be a schedule of amounts depending upon what grade the offense is,
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  for instance, 5 miles over, 25 miles over, et cetera.
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:12.000]  I've never seen a statute that gradiates that money, never.
[01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:20.000]  I have seen courts attempt to set it at a specific thing if you pay it.
[01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:22.000]  That is unconstitutional.
[01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  The state is setting a schedule of fees outside of what the statute itself defines,
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:36.000]  because if you just decide to pay the ticket, then it can be anywhere between those
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  and the court's getting to decide what it is if you're not going to fight.
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  Okay.
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:48.000]  And then you had told me a while back that I can go after the officer anytime in a civil suit.
[01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  No, not anytime.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  You have statute of limitations.
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  Well, yeah, I have to do it within a year, but I can do it before the appeal is over.
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  Right.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  Well, no, you don't have to do it before the appeal is over
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:07.000]  unless you think the appeal is going to go beyond that year.
[01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  Yeah.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  Yeah, okay.
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:12.000]  But I can start it now, though, is what I'm saying.
[01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  Well, it depends on whether or not you want to go after him for malicious prosecution.
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:20.000]  If you want to add malicious prosecution to this, you have to wait for this to be finished,
[01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  and you have to win.
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:22.000]  Oh, I do.
[01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  Okay.
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:25.000]  Otherwise, you can sue him for anything else.
[01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  Now, remember, the false imprisonment slash false arrest here in Texas,
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:34.000]  that is completely separate from the criminal trial against you.
[01:36:34.000 --> 01:36:40.000]  You can sue for that anytime you want because they are not tied together.
[01:36:40.000 --> 01:36:43.000]  Okay, and that's what I would like to get started.
[01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  Yeah, you can sue him for the false imprisonment or false arrest, most likely.
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:51.000]  Okay, I want to do it in federal court, and is that going to be in 1983?
[01:36:51.000 --> 01:36:53.000]  You can do it in federal and state.
[01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:56.000]  And, yes, it would be a 1983 suit.
[01:36:56.000 --> 01:37:03.000]  But there, if you've got state case law on your side, you'd want to do both.
[01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  Oh, or sue him in both courts?
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  Yes, you can sue him twice for the same thing because they're different fields of protection.
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  Okay.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:14.000]  They hate that, but it's true.
[01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:20.000]  In the audio part of your seminar, you talk about a fee schedule.
[01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  How much...
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:24.000]  No, I don't. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. I don't.
[01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  I don't go in for that.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:31.000]  I listen to everybody say they give a cop or a judge or somebody a fee schedule.
[01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:34.000]  Let me see you collect it, okay?
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:36.000]  You're going to give somebody a sheet of paper.
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:41.000]  You're killing trees for nothing because unless you sue and win,
[01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:47.000]  you're not getting a penny, and you don't get to decide what the amount is.
[01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:48.000]  The jury does.
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  Oh, you don't? Okay, that's...
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:56.000]  You can sue for any amount, but the jury's not obligated to pay it.
[01:37:56.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  Okay.
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:03.000]  So, no, I don't mention fee schedules.
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  Okay. I thought somebody mentioned it in one of your audios, but I'm not sure.
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  Well, there may have been people that called in and mentioned it.
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  Now, the closest thing that we've come to discussing that is cases that have set a precedent for amounts,
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:21.000]  like, for instance, Trezevant versus City of Tampa,
[01:38:21.000 --> 01:38:29.000]  where it's $1,063 in change per minute that he collected for being locked up.
[01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  He was locked up for 23 minutes, and the jury gave him $25,000.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:38.000]  Yeah, okay.
[01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  Okay. Well, you gave me a bundle of information. Thank you, Eddie.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:43.000]  You're very welcome.
[01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  Okay. Have a good evening.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:47.000]  You, too. Thanks for calling in.
[01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:49.000]  Okay. Bye. Bye-bye.
[01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:54.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Mike in, looks like Montana or Missouri.
[01:38:54.000 --> 01:38:56.000]  Mike, where are you at?
[01:38:56.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  Missouri.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:02.000]  Missouri. All right. So what you got?
[01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:03.000]  Well, I have a question.
[01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  I have talked to you before about rules 37 and 38 here in Missouri.
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:08.000]  Okay.
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  And they have to deal with the statute and ordinance violations and violation bureaus.
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:20.000]  And what we went over before is whether or not they had a valid charging instrument.
[01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  According to one judicial opinion that I found is that the courts have said that a prosecutor can sign the uniform traffic ticket upon his own knowledge or information and belief.
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:37.000]  The prosecutor?
[01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  Use it.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  Oh, the prosecutor?
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:43.000]  Yes.
[01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:48.000]  How is the prosecutor authorized to issue citations?
[01:39:48.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  No. The citation is issued by the officer.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  But then once the prosecutor signs it upon his own information or knowledge or information and belief, then it becomes, quote, unquote, an information.
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  And then... Does it meet the requirements of an information set forth in law by the legislature?
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  Well, the thing is that the court rules that actually... Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  No. Not no.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  The creation of charging instruments will be defined by a state constitution almost universally that's going to hold true.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  It'll call them whatever it's going to call them, and it will say what has to be in them will be determined by law.
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:43.000]  Who has the authority in your state to make law?
[01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  Is it the court?
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  Well, they would like to think they do.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:59.000]  Well, they may like to think it, but if the constitution of your state didn't give it to them, then it's a violation of separation of powers for them to try to exercise it.
[01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:04.000]  The instrument itself is not a matter of the rules of procedure.
[01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  The procedure is completely separate from the lawful requirements of being able to exercise those procedures.
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  So what did the legislature say was a proper instrument?
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  And what that instrument must contain?
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:32.000]  Well, I know that they claim that it has essentially the same information.
[01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  Who claims that?
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:36.000]  The courts.
[01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  Okay. My question is not what the courts are claiming.
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:52.000]  My question is, if you have read what the legislature said is required, does this citation meet all of those requirements?
[01:41:52.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  Not essentially, not almost, does it or does it not meet them?
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:14.000]  Because if it doesn't, then whatever court opinion came up with that ludicrous notion can be challenged as unconstitutional based upon a violation of the separation of powers.
[01:42:14.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  The legislature said A, the courts are trying to do B, they're trying to write law and legislate from the bench.
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:22.000]  They can't do it.
[01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  This opinion does that.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:28.000]  It's unconstitutional.
[01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  That's what needs to be done with it.
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:33.000]  Let me read you this part and get your opinion on this.
[01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:40.000]  It says, the charge was complete when he, the prosecutor, signed and filed the information.
[01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:50.000]  Since it was signed upon his own information and belief, the officer's complaint was mere surplusage and neither adds nor subtracts from the information.
[01:42:50.000 --> 01:43:00.000]  Okay, the question here is the way that's reading and the way you're discussing the citation, we're talking about two different instruments here.
[01:43:00.000 --> 01:43:09.000]  The officer's complaint, i.e., the citation or an individual complaint, and then the information by the prosecutor.
[01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:22.000]  The prosecutor in every state in Texas, he's responsible for doing that information, but he cannot make that information without a proper complaint, not in Texas.
[01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  The citation in Texas does not meet the requirements of a proper complaint.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  In any way, shape, or form, that matters because it is not 100%, okay?
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  In Missouri, they try and use the same form and just have the prosecutor sign it at the bottom.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  Okay, well hang on just a second. We'll cover that on the other side when we get back.
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. We are entering into our last segment.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  Please don't forget our fundraiser. I'm going to harp on that for just a minute. When we get back, y'all hang in there.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Sorry!
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  I'm confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve.
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  What?
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  I hope that Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them in 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment in enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Please visit LulaVlogRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:26.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:29.000]  Rule of Law Radio now, real quick.
[01:46:29.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  Please don't forget the Rule of Law Radio fundraiser.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  Deborah's working really hard and has some really great prizes up there for you guys.
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  If you'll just get your entries in, we really need that money because that's how this network stays on the air to bring you this show and all the other ones that are out there.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:46.000]  We cannot do this without you.
[01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:54.000]  Same thing applies with the Constitutional Challenge Motion for those of you in Texas, and it may even be adaptable to you in other states.
[01:46:54.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  You just have to take it and find out if you want to.
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  But it's 100 bucks for that motion, and that is only good until the 29th of this month.
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  On the 29th, it goes to 150 bucks, okay?
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:10.000]  So prior to the 29th, great.
[01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:13.000]  On the 29th, $50 more.
[01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:15.000]  All right, so don't forget that.
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:20.000]  But please, where you can, when you can, as often as you can, donate to the network.
[01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:26.000]  Set up a monthly $10, $15, $20, whether it be to individuals or to the network.
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  Please, we can't be here to do this for you without you, okay?
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:34.000]  None of us are inherently wealthy.
[01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:37.000]  If we were, we'd have a much bigger radio station, okay?
[01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:48.000]  But we're not. So please, help us stay on the air to bring this information to you so we can help you with these issues just like we've been doing for years now.
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:51.000]  All right, that being said, let's get back to Mike.
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:55.000]  All right, Mike, please continue.
[01:47:55.000 --> 01:48:07.000]  When we were talking about the officer's complaint and the fact that the courts have said that it was mere surplusage and neither adds nor subtracts from the information.
[01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:11.000]  Okay, again, it may not add or subtract from the information.
[01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:22.000]  But here in Texas, which is something you need to look at there as well, the information cannot exist if a proper complaint does not exist.
[01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:27.000]  The information here does not exist in a vacuum.
[01:48:27.000 --> 01:48:32.000]  The prosecutor cannot initiate the case, never, ever.
[01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:34.000]  That's a conflict of interest.
[01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:40.000]  Therefore, he must have something else to base his information on.
[01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:52.000]  Does the citation in your state fit the bill for a formal complaint as put forth by the legislature?
[01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:55.000]  That I can't answer.
[01:48:55.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  That's what you have to answer because I guarantee you if you read where an information is allowed to be created by the prosecutor and the criteria for doing so, you're going to find that a complaint is required before he can do so.
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  And then you've got to figure out, well, what constitutes a valid complaint?
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  Somewhere the statutes have to say what does.
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  If it doesn't meet all of the statutory requirements of a proper complaint in form and substance, it's invalid.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:35.000]  Therefore, the information is invalid.
[01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:41.000]  And any court opinion that would make it valid outside of the law is not a court opinion.
[01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:48.000]  It's judicial fiat, and it needs to be challenged as unconstitutional.
[01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  Okay. I've got one more quick question here.
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  Okay.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:50:06.000]  On another judicial opinion, and it's talking if jurisdiction is lacking, the court has no power to hear a case, and then it quotes to or cites to other judicial opinions.
[01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  Correct. The only thing the court has the power to do is dismiss the case.
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  They can't do anything else if they lack jurisdiction.
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  And this was in the Court of Appeals, and he was challenging jurisdiction in a criminal case in Missouri.
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:29.000]  And they are quoting here, unfortunately, neither party has cited us to any case law,
[01:50:29.000 --> 01:50:39.000]  nor can we find any that directly addresses the standard of proof required to establish jurisdiction in a criminal case in Missouri.
[01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:48.000]  Then they go on to say we need not decide that issue, however, because we are convinced that the evidence deduced here was sufficient under the highest standard.
[01:50:48.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  What does your state constitution say as to a court getting invested with jurisdiction?
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  See, here in Texas it's very, very clear, Article 5, Section 12B, an indictment or information invests the court with jurisdiction.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:06.000]  Our courts are constantly trying to say that a complaint will do the job.
[01:51:06.000 --> 01:51:10.000]  No, it will not. The Constitution says it will not.
[01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  That opinion is invalid. It conflicts with the Constitution.
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:21.000]  And under the Bill of Rights, Article 1, Section 29, any power enacted by government,
[01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:26.000]  any department that conflicts with a constitutional provision is void.
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  So that court opinion is void.
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:37.000]  I know the Missouri Constitution says it has to be an information or an indictment.
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:43.000]  Okay, handed down by who, from where, to who.
[01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:52.000]  See, that's the thing. If you actually read everything in the Constitution and the statutes here, you actually must have all three of them in Texas.
[01:51:52.000 --> 01:51:57.000]  You must have a complaint. An information must be filed on that complaint.
[01:51:57.000 --> 01:52:05.000]  The complaint and the information must then be given to the grand jury who must then hand down an indictment.
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:11.000]  The indictment can be quashed, but if the information is not quashed,
[01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:18.000]  they can still pursue a prosecution despite the quashing of the indictment.
[01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:30.000]  From all this stuff I've been digging up, it appears as if Missouri's not quite as upfront with some of its information.
[01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:41.000]  Well, always start with the state Constitution. Take that over anything that anyone else does.
[01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:43.000]  Well, I sure appreciate it.
[01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:45.000]  Yes, sir. Anything else?
[01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  And I guess I have to go back and hit the books again.
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:51.000]  All right. Well, good luck, Mike.
[01:52:51.000 --> 01:52:52.000]  Thank you, sir.
[01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:53.000]  You're welcome.
[01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:54.000]  You too.
[01:52:54.000 --> 01:53:00.000]  All right. Now we've got Keith in West Virginia. Keith, what do you have?
[01:53:00.000 --> 01:53:02.000]  I've got a couple things.
[01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:09.000]  One thing on the most constitutional challenge, basically trying to figure out the nuts and bolts in my state.
[01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:15.000]  If I'm getting it right, the original intent as far as chasing that down, looking at the original act,
[01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:19.000]  to find the bill passed to give it power on the cover page,
[01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  the Secretary of State should basically certify that all the statutes in the codes are compliant with...
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:29.000]  Well, that's in the code book. We're not talking about the code book.
[01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:37.000]  If you want to learn legislative intent, you have to look at the title of the bill the legislature enacted the legislation under.
[01:53:37.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  The title of the bill. I looked at the West Virginia Constitution. Did you finally find it?
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  I haven't had time to get through it. I've been bouncing off the wall.
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:55.000]  It is written into the West Virginia Constitution exactly the way it is here.
[01:53:55.000 --> 01:54:04.000]  The bills in West Virginia have to have a title. That title must state the legislative purpose.
[01:54:04.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  Understood. Within West Virginia code also, it's found on pretty much every chapter.
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:22.000]  It says that if any part of the code is found to be unconstitutional...
[01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  Yeah, that's called a savings clause.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:40.000]  Did he disappear? He's still up on the board. Hold on. Are you still there, Keith?
[01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:41.000]  Yeah, I'm back.
[01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  Okay. Somebody muted. You don't know who, but you said you were reading the savings clause,
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:54.000]  where it said if any part of this is found unconstitutional, then that doesn't mean the rest of it is, right?
[01:54:54.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  Right.
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:55:00.000]  Okay. That savings clause may or may not save it at all. It really depends.
[01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  For instance, here in Texas, those saving clauses are absolutely worthless
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:12.000]  because the whole code was unconstitutional from the get-go.
[01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:20.000]  Understood. Another thing I got... I went for another pre-hearing
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:27.000]  on basically getting charged everything that I could, tags, insurance, license, all that.
[01:55:27.000 --> 01:55:32.000]  But when I failed to plead, they came back out with a felony charge against me
[01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  because I blacked out my registration sticker on my tag. As far as that...
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  Oh, well, wait a minute. Wait a minute. Why did you do this?
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:56.000]  Well, my intent was to use it as an identity plate and black that out for purposes of trying to show that I wasn't participating.
[01:55:56.000 --> 01:56:04.000]  Okay. Let me... Okay. This is a ball-peen hammer moment.
[01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  All right. I hope you have aspirin because you're going to need it here in a second.
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  You took one of their official documents, whether it be your metal plate or the tag that goes on it,
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:32.000]  and you altered that document for your own purposes outside of those that they legally established for proper use.
[01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  Is that what you're telling me?
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:35.000]  Yes.
[01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:39.000]  Okay. You got a mirror?
[01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  Not in front of me. Thanks, man.
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:50.000]  Well, if you were, you can look there and see a dumb ass because that was not smart.
[01:56:50.000 --> 01:57:00.000]  Do not ever alter their documentation except in the prescribed manner.
[01:57:00.000 --> 01:57:07.000]  That's what tampering with a government record means. You got that?
[01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:12.000]  Sir, there's no going back on that. I'm guilty.
[01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  Well, the problem there is if they hear this recording, yeah, you're right. You're guilty.
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  If you confess to it in the open court, you're guilty. There ain't no question of that.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:30.000]  That's not good.
[01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:36.000]  Aladdin couldn't give you a lamp and bail your butt out of this one.
[01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:46.000]  Well, I'll swallow the tail on that. Moving on, federal Supreme Court case law, the authority it has over my state court.
[01:57:46.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  Yeah. It'll have authority over anything that's a federally protected right or activity, but it will have no effect in relation to state law itself unless the state law violates something at the federal level.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  All right. Thank you for calling in. You have a good night and good luck, man.
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  All right, folks. This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio. For all the callers still up on the board, I am sorry I was not able to get to you before the end of the show.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  Just the way it works out on some nights. We do our best, but hey, there's only one of me.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  All right, folks. Again, please be conscious of the fundraiser. Please make donations to the website, for the network, as well as to me for the lawsuit and the things that we need.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  We're here for you. Show us we're appreciated. Help us out. I hope that y'all have a great and blessed week. Good night and God bless.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com