[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.000 --> 00:27.000]  Markets for the 6th of January 2016 opened up with gold at $1,093.40 an ounce, silver
[00:27.000 --> 00:35.000]  at $13.99 an ounce, Texas crude at $35.97 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently at $431
[00:35.000 --> 00:41.000]  U.S. currency.
[00:41.000 --> 00:47.000]  Today in history, Monday, January 6, 1958, Gibson patents its Flying V guitar, an electric
[00:47.000 --> 00:55.000]  guitar model with a radical futuristic V-body design.
[00:55.000 --> 00:59.000]  In recent news, here at the Lone Star Lowdown, we pride ourselves in bringing you the headlines
[00:59.000 --> 01:01.000]  of the day without the hype and media bias.
[01:01.000 --> 01:04.000]  As a result, we are always having to correct the narrative.
[01:04.000 --> 01:07.000]  So to cut to the chase, we are sorry for reporting some falsehoods yesterday.
[01:07.000 --> 01:11.000]  The Bundy situation in Oregon is not a standoff or occupation.
[01:11.000 --> 01:14.000]  According to the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom press conference, they are simply
[01:14.000 --> 01:19.000]  reclaiming the federal wildlife refuge for the state of Oregon and its citizenry, specifically
[01:19.000 --> 01:22.000]  all the ranchers that have had to give up lands to the BLM.
[01:22.000 --> 01:26.000]  Dwight Hammond and his son, Stephen, are facing terrorism charges and resentencing.
[01:26.000 --> 01:30.000]  The point of the land burns which eventually spread from their land to federal lands was
[01:30.000 --> 01:33.000]  for ranching purposes and not agricultural reasons.
[01:33.000 --> 01:36.000]  We are sorry for the incorrect reporting of the other day.
[01:36.000 --> 01:40.000]  Regardless of who drops the ball, the media, or even ourselves, we are always here to correct
[01:40.000 --> 01:46.000]  and clarify.
[01:46.000 --> 01:50.000]  The TransCanada Corporation has filed a lawsuit in a U.S. federal court in Houston, Texas
[01:50.000 --> 01:55.000]  stating that President Barack Obama's ban on the Keystone Pipeline supersedes his legitimate
[01:55.000 --> 01:57.000]  powers within the Constitution.
[01:57.000 --> 02:01.000]  Through a NAFTA claim, TransCanada is seeking to receive compensation for more than $15
[02:01.000 --> 02:11.000]  billion in the expenditures and damages it has accumulated as a result of the permit ban.
[02:11.000 --> 02:15.000]  Governor Jerry Brown declared a state of emergency today, ordering California state agencies
[02:15.000 --> 02:20.000]  to move as rapidly as possible in fixing a gas leak which has been spewing 110,000 pounds
[02:20.000 --> 02:23.000]  of natural gas per hour since October of last year.
[02:23.000 --> 02:27.000]  His declaration comes after previous attempts to plug the leak of methane have failed.
[02:27.000 --> 02:31.000]  He stated that, quote, seven state agencies are mobilized to protect public health, oversee
[02:31.000 --> 02:36.000]  Southern California's gas company's actions to stop the leak, track methane emissions,
[02:36.000 --> 02:44.000]  ensure worker safety, safeguard energy reliability, and address any other problems stemming from the leak.
[02:44.000 --> 02:48.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking to fill some advertisement slots.
[02:48.000 --> 02:52.000]  If you have a product or service you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give us a call at
[02:52.000 --> 02:56.000]  210-363-2257.
[02:56.000 --> 03:16.000]  Open your lowdown for January 6th, 2016.
[03:16.000 --> 03:26.000]  Really, man, come on, six o'clock news says somebody been shot, somebody's been abused,
[03:26.000 --> 03:32.000]  somebody blew up a building, somebody stole their car, somebody got away, somebody didn't
[03:32.000 --> 03:39.000]  get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far.
[03:39.000 --> 03:46.000]  Grant Paffey told my Paffey back in my day, son, a man had to answer for the ways that he
[03:46.000 --> 03:53.000]  done, take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them dead boys in
[03:53.000 --> 04:01.000]  the highest tree, for all the people to see.
[04:01.000 --> 04:07.000]  That justice is one thing you should always find, you gotta settle up your boys, you gotta
[04:07.000 --> 04:09.000]  draw a hard line.
[04:09.000 --> 04:15.000]  When the gun folks settles, we'll sing a victory tune and we'll all meet back at the
[04:15.000 --> 04:17.000]  horse's hooves.
[04:17.000 --> 04:25.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil horses singing, west gate for my men, beer for my
[04:25.000 --> 04:27.000]  horses.
[04:27.000 --> 04:28.000]  All right, folks, good evening.
[04:28.000 --> 04:31.000]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:31.000 --> 04:35.000]  It is January 11th, 2016.
[04:35.000 --> 04:41.000]  We are now in our second week and going forward into the newest year.
[04:41.000 --> 04:45.000]  A couple things I want to go over tonight before we start taking calls, the first one dealing
[04:45.000 --> 04:55.000]  with the situation up in Oregon and the so-called retaking of federal land back to the state
[04:55.000 --> 04:57.000]  of Oregon.
[04:57.000 --> 05:02.000]  Newsflash, folks, especially those of you in Oregon that don't understand the limits
[05:02.000 --> 05:11.000]  of federal authority within the territorial borders of the states, if Oregon did not cede,
[05:11.000 --> 05:20.000]  as in give up, surrender, sell, and or transfer all possession and authority of the lands
[05:20.000 --> 05:28.000]  in question, including that which the Hammons allegedly committed arson on, to the federal
[05:28.000 --> 05:33.000]  government, they are not federal lands.
[05:33.000 --> 05:36.000]  They are state lands.
[05:36.000 --> 05:44.000]  They might be federally managed, but that does not give the feds jurisdiction for any
[05:44.000 --> 05:52.000]  alleged crimes perpetrated on that land, period.
[05:52.000 --> 05:57.000]  Or does someone not understand that in the Oregon government?
[05:57.000 --> 06:04.000]  You guys have a congressman that represents that area that goes to the floor of the Congress
[06:04.000 --> 06:11.000]  to make a big speech on the law that the BLM ignored that he actually wrote for them to
[06:11.000 --> 06:19.000]  work in synchronicity with the state on managing this land, and not once in this entire speech
[06:19.000 --> 06:26.000]  did I ever hear him mention that A, the land had been ceded and was actually under federal
[06:26.000 --> 06:32.000]  authority for that purpose, or that B, the federal government had no right to be there
[06:32.000 --> 06:38.000]  punishing anybody because it was not ceded to the government.
[06:38.000 --> 06:43.000]  So your representative in Congress is a moron.
[06:43.000 --> 06:50.000]  If for no other reason than he does not understand the limits of federal authority and jurisdiction
[06:50.000 --> 06:58.000]  within the borders of the state he claims to represent.
[06:58.000 --> 07:07.000]  The folks up there that have quote unquote retaken that game preserve didn't retake anything.
[07:07.000 --> 07:09.000]  It never left.
[07:09.000 --> 07:11.000]  Not their fault.
[07:11.000 --> 07:15.000]  And they're right in saying the BLM doesn't belong there.
[07:15.000 --> 07:17.000]  They have no authority there.
[07:17.000 --> 07:20.000]  They're completely correct.
[07:20.000 --> 07:27.000]  But the sheriff of the county is also a moron who doesn't seem to understand that concept
[07:27.000 --> 07:34.000]  of limited authority and zero jurisdiction.
[07:34.000 --> 07:39.000]  But then again, what do you expect when most of the people that you've entrusted with the
[07:39.000 --> 07:47.000]  power over you and your property work for somebody else and not for you?
[07:47.000 --> 07:55.000]  I mean, that ranks right up there with A, electing Obama president, B, electing Rahm
[07:55.000 --> 08:09.000]  Emanuel mayor of Chicago, and C, making Hillary Clinton the secretary of anything except waste disposal.
[08:09.000 --> 08:16.000]  How stupid can you get to let these people get away with this for their own profit and
[08:16.000 --> 08:22.000]  gain because that's what this is going to boil down to in the long run.
[08:22.000 --> 08:25.000]  The federal government is going to take this land.
[08:25.000 --> 08:27.000]  Then they're going to use it.
[08:27.000 --> 08:32.000]  And the government there is actually the very people I just mentioned.
[08:32.000 --> 08:33.000]  It's not you.
[08:33.000 --> 08:34.000]  It's not me.
[08:34.000 --> 08:36.000]  It's not anyone like us.
[08:36.000 --> 08:39.000]  It's not the people of Oregon to whom it rightly belongs.
[08:39.000 --> 08:45.000]  It is a select few people that believe they can use the power of a public office to further
[08:45.000 --> 08:52.000]  tax themselves by cutting deals with foreign businesses, other corporate businesses, anybody
[08:52.000 --> 08:57.000]  and everybody that will put money in their pocket if they will only give them access
[08:57.000 --> 09:04.000]  to that land while keeping everyone else off of it.
[09:04.000 --> 09:07.000]  Think about that.
[09:07.000 --> 09:15.000]  But because we have allowed Washington, D.C. to usurp another power that is not within
[09:15.000 --> 09:24.000]  their purview at all in any way, shape, or form, and that is education and its manipulation
[09:24.000 --> 09:30.000]  and control by the Washington, D.C. department of education, which is a complete freaking
[09:30.000 --> 09:36.000]  misnomer in any state of the union, we no longer have a social studies class.
[09:36.000 --> 09:40.000]  We no longer have constitutional education in class.
[09:40.000 --> 09:45.000]  We don't have any of those things because they want you ignorant of the limits of what
[09:45.000 --> 09:47.000]  they can do.
[09:47.000 --> 09:53.000]  They want you watching the TV shows where the feds walk in and everybody else bows down.
[09:53.000 --> 10:00.000]  They want you listening to all of the news articles where everybody can just turn everything
[10:00.000 --> 10:06.000]  over to the feds because somebody comes in, flashes a badge and says, give me a desk I'm
[10:06.000 --> 10:08.000]  taking over.
[10:08.000 --> 10:13.000]  That's not the way it works.
[10:13.000 --> 10:18.000]  But as long as you don't know that, they'll continue to get away with it.
[10:18.000 --> 10:23.000]  And that is what's going to destroy this country.
[10:23.000 --> 10:29.000]  Your lack of knowledge and information about the limits of those that work for you because
[10:29.000 --> 10:35.000]  you are allowing them to seize powers that we never gave them.
[10:35.000 --> 10:39.000]  And then you're allowing them to keep them.
[10:39.000 --> 10:41.000]  You're not standing up against it.
[10:41.000 --> 10:48.000]  You're looking the other way because you don't consider it to be your personal fight.
[10:48.000 --> 10:54.000]  And so you're willing to let them destroy those that do stand up without ever realizing
[10:54.000 --> 10:58.000]  that eventually they will get around to you.
[10:58.000 --> 11:02.000]  And then who's going to be there to help you because the ones that would fight have already
[11:02.000 --> 11:04.000]  been destroyed.
[11:04.000 --> 11:10.000]  It's kind of like that old story about, you know, I keep throwing the weaker people to
[11:10.000 --> 11:14.000]  the crocodile until no one was left but me.
[11:14.000 --> 11:21.000]  And then the only option you got left at that point is either be eaten or kill the crocodile.
[11:21.000 --> 11:28.000]  Well, if you fed him real well in all this time, odds are you're not going to win, especially
[11:28.000 --> 11:34.000]  if you're fighting him in his own domain.
[11:34.000 --> 11:39.000]  So you need to stop thinking about it won't happen, it can't happen, it shouldn't be
[11:39.000 --> 11:40.000]  happening.
[11:40.000 --> 11:48.000]  Stop worrying about how things ought to be and look for once at how they actually are
[11:48.000 --> 11:58.000]  and why and why it does not behoove you in any way to ignore it.
[11:58.000 --> 12:06.000]  It's like ignoring game green in an appendage.
[12:06.000 --> 12:11.000]  And it's getting worse day by day, minute by minute.
[12:11.000 --> 12:14.000]  It's getting worse.
[12:14.000 --> 12:17.000]  So what are we going to do about it?
[12:17.000 --> 12:20.000]  The folks up there on that land in Oregon aren't wrong.
[12:20.000 --> 12:22.000]  The Hammons to do what they did weren't wrong.
[12:22.000 --> 12:28.000]  They committed no crime, especially no crime under any federal jurisdiction.
[12:28.000 --> 12:36.000]  The feds had no authority to charge, try, convict and jail them, none.
[12:36.000 --> 12:41.000]  And yet the state government allowed it to happen knowing full well the federal authorities
[12:41.000 --> 12:48.000]  had no authority on that land nor over those people.
[12:48.000 --> 12:53.000]  Let's look at this from a legal, logical standpoint.
[12:53.000 --> 13:11.000]  If let's say the Dell Corporation here in Austin had a security guard and someone went out
[13:11.000 --> 13:21.000]  and burned the lawn in front of the corporate building and the security guard caught them,
[13:21.000 --> 13:25.000]  does Dell have the power to prosecute them?
[13:25.000 --> 13:27.000]  No.
[13:27.000 --> 13:36.000]  Dell can file charges because they own the property, but they can't do the prosecution.
[13:36.000 --> 13:39.000]  They don't have that kind of power.
[13:39.000 --> 13:46.000]  But then again, neither does the federal government within the territorial borders of a state
[13:46.000 --> 13:52.000]  unless the property on which they sit has been ceded to them and they own it,
[13:52.000 --> 14:00.000]  just like Dell owns that campus that got burned.
[14:00.000 --> 14:03.000]  But again, we let them get away with this.
[14:03.000 --> 14:05.000]  Why? Why?
[14:05.000 --> 14:07.000]  Well, because you're ignorant.
[14:07.000 --> 14:12.000]  You sit in a jury box and you say, well, they must be guilty or the government wouldn't be going through
[14:12.000 --> 14:17.000]  this trouble and just like in tax cases, you convict them because some moronic government official
[14:17.000 --> 14:23.000]  says so because you never got taught social studies and federal jurisdiction
[14:23.000 --> 14:31.000]  and limitations of jurisdiction in your life, not in kindergarten, grade school, junior high,
[14:31.000 --> 14:33.000]  high school or college.
[14:33.000 --> 14:39.000]  It was left completely out of your education thanks to the Washington, D.C. Department of Education.
[14:39.000 --> 14:49.000]  Thanks to the fact that you sat in a classroom to regurgitate only the facts they stuck in your head.
[14:49.000 --> 14:55.000]  We are losing our country because we cannot think for ourselves.
[14:55.000 --> 14:58.000]  We cannot read something and comprehend it.
[14:58.000 --> 15:00.000]  We cannot critically analyze it.
[15:00.000 --> 15:02.000]  We cannot critically discuss it.
[15:02.000 --> 15:10.000]  We cannot objectively discuss it and see anything for what it really is.
[15:10.000 --> 15:15.000]  Most of it is a fraud.
[15:15.000 --> 15:22.000]  But because we don't understand any of it these days, it all looks normal because we've been indoctrinated
[15:22.000 --> 15:24.000]  to accept it as normal.
[15:24.000 --> 15:26.000]  We've seen it our whole lives.
[15:26.000 --> 15:31.000]  We've never thought to question what was right in front of us because we've always been told this is
[15:31.000 --> 15:37.000]  not supposed to be.
[15:37.000 --> 15:43.000]  We've got to change that, and we've got to change it fast.
[15:43.000 --> 15:51.000]  Now, that being said, this goes also in the general direction of the stuff that I talked about in class
[15:51.000 --> 16:00.000]  this past weekend, and that was how the state uses terminology to defraud the public.
[16:00.000 --> 16:05.000]  Well, that's exactly the same thing the federal government's doing to defraud the public.
[16:05.000 --> 16:15.000]  We're back to the use of language to create the impression that what we're seeing is one thing
[16:15.000 --> 16:20.000]  while the reality is it is something else entirely.
[16:20.000 --> 16:26.000]  We are being asked to look at a word picture and see a Rembrandt when in fact it's a kindergarten
[16:26.000 --> 16:29.000]  finger painting.
[16:29.000 --> 16:34.000]  But because you never studied art, you don't know the difference.
[16:34.000 --> 16:40.000]  You know something's off, but you just can't put your finger on it.
[16:40.000 --> 16:45.000]  It goes to language and comprehension.
[16:45.000 --> 16:48.000]  And we'll get into that a little bit more on the other side when we get back.
[16:48.000 --> 16:53.000]  So y'all hang in there while we take this break, and I will keep going when we return.
[16:53.000 --> 17:00.000]  So y'all hang on folks, we'll be right back.
[17:23.000 --> 17:25.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:53.000 --> 17:55.000]  We'll be right back.
[18:23.000 --> 18:25.000]  We'll be right back.
[18:53.000 --> 19:05.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network, the Logos Radio Network.com.
[19:05.000 --> 19:09.000]  LogosradioNetwork.com
[19:35.000 --> 19:39.000]  LogosradioNetwork.com
[20:05.000 --> 20:09.000]  LogosradioNetwork.com
[20:09.000 --> 20:37.000]  LogosradioNetwork.com
[20:39.000 --> 20:43.000]  LogosradioNetwork.com
[20:43.000 --> 20:47.000]  LogosradioNetwork.com
[20:47.000 --> 20:51.000]  LogosradioNetwork.com
[20:51.000 --> 21:13.000]  LogosradioNetwork.com
[21:13.000 --> 21:27.000]  LogosradioNetwork.com
[21:27.000 --> 21:41.000]  LogosradioNetwork.com
[21:41.000 --> 21:45.000]  The Texas Constitution absolutely does not.
[21:45.000 --> 21:50.000]  Not in any place whatsoever does it do that.
[21:50.000 --> 22:01.000]  In fact, the language of it specifically prohibits anybody from exercising that power other than the legislature.
[22:01.000 --> 22:06.000]  Because of that, that's the purpose of this discussion.
[22:06.000 --> 22:17.000]  Because the discussion hinges on the question of how do you respond to a case involving an alleged violation of a city ordinance in Texas?
[22:17.000 --> 22:20.000]  Well, it kind of goes like this.
[22:20.000 --> 22:28.000]  What I'm going to do is I'm going to read some of the document that I posted on Facebook
[22:28.000 --> 22:39.000]  and explain to you step by step exactly how we go about making this rebuttal to any allegation relating to an ordinance.
[22:39.000 --> 22:48.000]  Now, a friend of mine got charged with a violation of the Land Development Code, which is not enacted into law in any way whatsoever in Texas.
[22:48.000 --> 22:58.000]  It is adopted by virtually every municipality as its codebook for anything dealing with property.
[22:58.000 --> 23:01.000]  Now, there's two issues with the Land Development Code.
[23:01.000 --> 23:04.000]  One, it applies only to land developers.
[23:04.000 --> 23:13.000]  It does not apply to the people who buy the property from the developer or who buy it from the organization who paid the developer to build it.
[23:13.000 --> 23:17.000]  It never applied to the private property owner.
[23:17.000 --> 23:20.000]  It only applied to the land developer.
[23:20.000 --> 23:35.000]  They're the ones that were required by that code to get all the permits to do all the stuff that was required to build the subdivision you live in within that municipality.
[23:35.000 --> 23:38.000]  That's the first problem with it.
[23:38.000 --> 23:41.000]  The second one is it's not enacted into state law.
[23:41.000 --> 23:50.000]  And even if it was, no one gave the legislature authority over your private property to do what it's trying to do because the legislature, believe it or not,
[23:50.000 --> 24:01.000]  is forbidden specifically by Article III, Section 56, from enacting any local laws in very specific areas.
[24:01.000 --> 24:03.000]  And guess what those areas are?
[24:03.000 --> 24:09.000]  There's about 19 of them if memory serves, maybe a few more.
[24:09.000 --> 24:23.000]  But the point is if the legislature is forbidden to enact local laws in relation to that subject matter and that subject matter forbids them to access your private property,
[24:23.000 --> 24:33.000]  then how can someone else do it instead of the state when the state is the legislature is the only body given lawmaking power?
[24:33.000 --> 24:38.000]  Well, I'm about to show you exactly how that's true.
[24:38.000 --> 24:52.000]  When you do a search for the phrase law means, within the online statutes, you will get 17 hits returned to you in a list.
[24:52.000 --> 24:54.000]  There will be 17.
[24:54.000 --> 25:05.000]  Out of those 17, there are only four or five where the term law is defined exclusively by itself.
[25:05.000 --> 25:20.000]  In all others, it is in relation to other terms that make it a phrase like traffic law means, financial responsibility law means, okay?
[25:20.000 --> 25:39.000]  But what we're going to see is why the definitions that were put into the statutes are themselves direct violations of the state constitution if those statutes are allegedly applicable to the general public,
[25:39.000 --> 25:41.000]  which they're not, by the way.
[25:41.000 --> 25:46.000]  But in this particular case, we're going to show you how they're not.
[25:46.000 --> 25:50.000]  And once again, we're going to use the transportation code to do that.
[25:50.000 --> 25:56.000]  Now, the code that has the most references to the term law is the government code, not the local government code.
[25:56.000 --> 26:00.000]  It only has one, but the government code has five.
[26:00.000 --> 26:11.000]  One of those is completely unconstitutional because it is implied that it can be used against the public.
[26:11.000 --> 26:16.000]  The transportation code has it defined twice.
[26:16.000 --> 26:24.000]  And we already know that the transportation code subject matter is limited exclusively to those engaged in transportation.
[26:24.000 --> 26:32.000]  But we also know that I've proven through documentation that the transportation code itself is invalid law.
[26:32.000 --> 26:34.000]  It was enacted unconstitutionally.
[26:34.000 --> 26:37.000]  It has no force and effect of law.
[26:37.000 --> 26:46.000]  And now we're going to see exactly why no ordinance at either the municipal or county level has law applicable to the public,
[26:46.000 --> 26:49.000]  law power applicable to the public either.
[26:49.000 --> 26:50.000]  All right?
[26:50.000 --> 26:54.000]  So let's go through this step by step.
[26:54.000 --> 27:02.000]  First and foremost, understand ordinances are not and cannot be enforced as public law in Texas.
[27:02.000 --> 27:11.000]  If you read Article 3 of the Texas Constitution, that is absolutely clear.
[27:11.000 --> 27:14.000]  There is no question of it.
[27:14.000 --> 27:25.000]  Nowhere does the Texas Constitution authorize any other body to create public law other than the Texas legislature.
[27:25.000 --> 27:36.000]  In fact, the term ordinance appears exactly once in each of Articles 9 dealing with counties and 11 dealing with municipalities.
[27:36.000 --> 27:47.000]  And in neither of those articles is it ever addressed or identified as being law or as authorizing either of those entities,
[27:47.000 --> 27:55.000]  even as political subdivisions of the state, to create law binding upon the public.
[27:55.000 --> 28:03.000]  No such language exists in either article, and for good reason, because it isn't there.
[28:03.000 --> 28:13.000]  It would be absolutely stupid to create a Constitution that gives the high-level legislature the power to create law
[28:13.000 --> 28:19.000]  and then power to the locals to write law that would overrule the legislature.
[28:19.000 --> 28:24.000]  So we don't have multiple lawmaking bodies in Texas.
[28:24.000 --> 28:27.000]  We have one and only one.
[28:27.000 --> 28:29.000]  How do we know this?
[28:29.000 --> 28:31.000]  We know this because we can read.
[28:31.000 --> 28:36.000]  The only question left is can we comprehend what we read?
[28:36.000 --> 28:39.000]  Well, let's find out.
[28:39.000 --> 28:46.000]  Within Article 11, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution, which is 100% dedicated to municipalities,
[28:46.000 --> 28:51.000]  we read the following in relation to municipalities.
[28:51.000 --> 29:01.000]  The adoption or amendment of charters is subject to such limitations as may be prescribed by the legislature.
[29:01.000 --> 29:10.000]  And no charter or any ordinance passed under said charter shall contain any provision inconsistent
[29:10.000 --> 29:17.000]  with the Constitution of the state or of the general laws enacted by the legislature of this state.
[29:17.000 --> 29:18.000]  Now what does that mean?
[29:18.000 --> 29:20.000]  Very simple.
[29:20.000 --> 29:28.000]  Article 11, Section 5 specifically forbids a municipality from granting themselves the power
[29:28.000 --> 29:32.000]  to make any binding public law within their charter.
[29:32.000 --> 29:34.000]  They can't do it.
[29:34.000 --> 29:37.000]  That would be a violation of the Texas Constitution.
[29:37.000 --> 29:43.000]  And I'll show you exactly where it would be a violation when we get back on the other side of this break.
[29:43.000 --> 30:03.000]  So y'all hang in there and we'll be back in just a minute.
[30:03.000 --> 30:05.000]  Fires, earthquakes, yikes.
[30:05.000 --> 30:07.000]  Our homes are subject to lots of threats,
[30:07.000 --> 30:12.000]  but the number one cause of catastrophic water damage is something you can easily prevent.
[30:12.000 --> 30:16.000]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht back with a quick tip to keep your house dry next.
[30:16.000 --> 30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.000 --> 30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:28.000]  So protect your rights.
[30:28.000 --> 30:32.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:38.000]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[30:38.000 --> 30:42.000]  a private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:49.000]  When was the last time you replaced the hose on your washing machine?
[30:49.000 --> 30:52.000]  I bet you never have, and that's not smart.
[30:52.000 --> 30:57.000]  Burst washing machine hoses are the number one cause of catastrophic water damage.
[30:57.000 --> 31:02.000]  See, every time a washing machine cycle ends, it sends a shockwave through the pipes.
[31:02.000 --> 31:06.000]  After years of this water hammer, the rubber gives out and the hose can burst.
[31:06.000 --> 31:09.000]  And when those hoses go, they really gush.
[31:09.000 --> 31:11.000]  It's like a garden hose in your laundry room.
[31:11.000 --> 31:14.000]  Not what you want to come home to after a long day at work.
[31:14.000 --> 31:20.000]  So a good rule of thumb is to replace them every five years or use stainless steel flexible piping.
[31:20.000 --> 31:23.000]  Otherwise, your house could be hosed.
[31:23.000 --> 31:37.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:53.000 --> 32:03.000]  The world's most private search engine.
[32:03.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[32:08.000 --> 32:10.000]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.000 --> 32:18.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:18.000 --> 32:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:23.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:23.000 --> 32:26.000]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:32.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.000 --> 32:34.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:38.000 --> 32:41.000]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:43.000 --> 32:46.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:48.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.000]  hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:53.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[32:53.000 --> 32:55.000]  from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 32:58.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society
[32:58.000 --> 33:03.000]  we all want and deserve.
[33:03.000 --> 33:15.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:15.000 --> 33:41.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[33:41.000 --> 33:44.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:44.000 --> 33:47.000]  All right, now, hang on to your seat belts.
[33:47.000 --> 33:52.000]  The ride's fixing to get very loud and very vehement here
[33:52.000 --> 33:55.000]  because this is exactly what I'm talking about.
[33:55.000 --> 33:59.000]  We may not have a social studies class in school,
[33:59.000 --> 34:02.000]  but believe it or not, if you want to be a free American,
[34:02.000 --> 34:06.000]  you have a duty and responsibility to learn the information
[34:06.000 --> 34:09.000]  I'm about to put out here for you.
[34:09.000 --> 34:12.000]  Because when you fail to do so,
[34:12.000 --> 34:17.000]  you wind up exactly where we are.
[34:17.000 --> 34:22.000]  We are enslaved to those that are supposed to be serving us
[34:22.000 --> 34:25.000]  because they knowingly and intentionally misrepresent
[34:25.000 --> 34:30.000]  the limits of the authority that we gave to them.
[34:30.000 --> 34:33.000]  It's the whole reason why the court cannot grant itself the power
[34:33.000 --> 34:36.000]  to be the sole interpreter of the Constitution,
[34:36.000 --> 34:42.000]  because once it has done that, it can give itself all the power
[34:42.000 --> 34:45.000]  and say that it never was intended to limit them
[34:45.000 --> 34:49.000]  or the government to begin with.
[34:49.000 --> 34:52.000]  So listen up.
[34:52.000 --> 34:56.000]  The legislature not only can the municipality not grant itself
[34:56.000 --> 34:58.000]  lawmaking power in the charter,
[34:58.000 --> 35:01.000]  because that would be a violation of the Texas Constitution,
[35:01.000 --> 35:05.000]  the legislature cannot delegate it to them.
[35:05.000 --> 35:08.000]  And they most certainly cannot delegate it to them
[35:08.000 --> 35:15.000]  through the aspect of nothing more than a statutory definition.
[35:15.000 --> 35:18.000]  And in those four or five that I was talking about earlier
[35:18.000 --> 35:25.000]  where the term law appears entirely by itself in the defined term,
[35:25.000 --> 35:29.000]  but in each of those, this definition attempts to define
[35:29.000 --> 35:33.000]  everything under the sun created by anyone,
[35:33.000 --> 35:39.000]  municipalities, counties, agencies, school boards as law
[35:39.000 --> 35:44.000]  using nothing more than a definition.
[35:44.000 --> 35:51.000]  That, if allowed to stand, is a constitutional end run.
[35:51.000 --> 35:54.000]  They can't delegate the power to these entities to write law,
[35:54.000 --> 35:57.000]  so what they do is they let them write whatever they want,
[35:57.000 --> 36:01.000]  and then the legislature surreptitiously declares it to be law
[36:01.000 --> 36:04.000]  through a definition.
[36:04.000 --> 36:07.000]  But there's a problem.
[36:07.000 --> 36:10.000]  And we're about to show you what that problem is
[36:10.000 --> 36:14.000]  and why your legislator should be hanging from the trees
[36:14.000 --> 36:18.000]  and the lamp posts all over the Capitol building.
[36:18.000 --> 36:21.000]  Because every one of them should know this.
[36:21.000 --> 36:24.000]  They have no right to claim ignorance of their liability
[36:24.000 --> 36:29.000]  and duty under the Constitution when they hold a public office.
[36:29.000 --> 36:34.000]  And yet, here's what we're dealing with.
[36:34.000 --> 36:38.000]  But understand that because they can't do these things
[36:38.000 --> 36:41.000]  and because these definitions cannot do
[36:41.000 --> 36:44.000]  what they're alleged to be doing,
[36:44.000 --> 36:48.000]  this is exactly why I make the argument that they cannot apply
[36:48.000 --> 36:53.000]  to anyone other than employees of the government.
[36:53.000 --> 36:56.000]  Okay, that's one.
[36:56.000 --> 36:59.000]  Anybody contracted with the government who has to obey
[36:59.000 --> 37:02.000]  the rules and regulations of the company they contract with
[37:02.000 --> 37:08.000]  in this case, things that are created by or authorized
[37:08.000 --> 37:12.000]  to be within the power and subject to the municipal
[37:12.000 --> 37:16.000]  or county authority through state decree.
[37:16.000 --> 37:19.000]  And that's not you and me, by the way.
[37:19.000 --> 37:23.000]  That's incorporated entities, you know, like McDonald's
[37:23.000 --> 37:26.000]  or any of the big businesses that are operating within
[37:26.000 --> 37:28.000]  the territorial borders of the municipality
[37:28.000 --> 37:30.000]  and its area of jurisdiction or the counties
[37:30.000 --> 37:32.000]  and its area of jurisdiction.
[37:32.000 --> 37:36.000]  But it is not you and me because we are not created,
[37:36.000 --> 37:38.000]  nor did we authorize the legislature
[37:38.000 --> 37:41.000]  or any of these other entities to dictate our lives.
[37:41.000 --> 37:45.000]  Nowhere in the Constitution did we do that.
[37:45.000 --> 37:49.000]  Or those that knowingly and willingly consent to being bound
[37:49.000 --> 37:53.000]  by these rules and regulations that otherwise do not apply.
[37:53.000 --> 37:56.000]  How can we prove they don't apply?
[37:56.000 --> 38:01.000]  We read Article 3, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution,
[38:01.000 --> 38:03.000]  Senate and House of Representatives.
[38:03.000 --> 38:06.000]  The legislative power of this state shall be vested
[38:06.000 --> 38:09.000]  in a Senate and a House of Representatives.
[38:09.000 --> 38:15.000]  The legislative power does not designate any other body.
[38:15.000 --> 38:19.000]  It designates each house of the legislature, which together
[38:19.000 --> 38:24.000]  shall be styled the legislature of the state of Texas.
[38:24.000 --> 38:27.000]  You have Section 2 of Article 3,
[38:27.000 --> 38:31.000]  Membership of Senate and House of Representatives.
[38:31.000 --> 38:34.000]  The Senate shall consist of 31 members.
[38:34.000 --> 38:38.000]  The House of Representatives shall consist of 150 members.
[38:38.000 --> 38:39.000]  Why do I bring that up?
[38:39.000 --> 38:41.000]  Well, I'll bring it up for this reason.
[38:41.000 --> 38:45.000]  If the Constitution specifically limits membership
[38:45.000 --> 38:48.000]  to a specific number in each house,
[38:48.000 --> 38:54.000]  then that means those numbers cannot be padded by adding members
[38:54.000 --> 38:59.000]  from city councils or county commissioners' courts to the legislature
[38:59.000 --> 39:02.000]  in order to give them legislative power
[39:02.000 --> 39:05.000]  to do what they're doing at that level, right?
[39:05.000 --> 39:06.000]  They're not members of the legislature.
[39:06.000 --> 39:09.000]  They can't act as members of the legislature.
[39:09.000 --> 39:12.000]  If the Constitution sets a specific number of those
[39:12.000 --> 39:18.000]  and that number was elected to office, these guys can't get in.
[39:18.000 --> 39:22.000]  So right there, we've locked them out of being able to participate
[39:22.000 --> 39:26.000]  in the legislature, but even if the legislature,
[39:26.000 --> 39:29.000]  let's say each house was 10 short,
[39:29.000 --> 39:33.000]  that would not grant the power of anyone in these positions
[39:33.000 --> 39:37.000]  at the county or municipal level to participate, and here's why.
[39:37.000 --> 39:39.000]  How can we make this stick?
[39:39.000 --> 39:44.000]  Again, we read Article 3, Sections 1 and 2.
[39:44.000 --> 39:50.000]  We read that, but now we read in Section 19,
[39:50.000 --> 39:55.000]  ineligibility of persons holding other offices.
[39:55.000 --> 40:00.000]  No judge of any court, secretary of state, attorney general,
[40:00.000 --> 40:05.000]  clerk of any court of record, or any person holding a lucrative office
[40:05.000 --> 40:10.000]  under the United States or this state or any foreign government
[40:10.000 --> 40:14.000]  shall during the term for which he is elected or appointed
[40:14.000 --> 40:17.000]  be eligible to the legislature.
[40:17.000 --> 40:21.000]  Now there's two ways a city attorney can argue this.
[40:21.000 --> 40:26.000]  Either A, they are acting as a political subdivision of the state
[40:26.000 --> 40:31.000]  in their actions, thus they hold a lucrative office under this state,
[40:31.000 --> 40:38.000]  or they are not acting under state authority as a political subdivision,
[40:38.000 --> 40:43.000]  but solely as an incorporated entity with its own local government,
[40:43.000 --> 40:48.000]  which its government would be specifically limited by the Constitution itself
[40:48.000 --> 40:53.000]  in exactly the way we're discussing.
[40:53.000 --> 40:58.000]  So as you can see, there is no out for the city attorney to win this argument,
[40:58.000 --> 41:01.000]  no matter which direction he chooses to go in,
[41:01.000 --> 41:03.000]  and here's how we're going to do that.
[41:03.000 --> 41:07.000]  If they want to argue, let's do it this way.
[41:07.000 --> 41:12.000]  First question to the city attorney, by what form of official mechanism
[41:12.000 --> 41:15.000]  did the members of whatever city, and for the sake of argument,
[41:15.000 --> 41:18.000]  an example here, let's use Austin,
[41:18.000 --> 41:22.000]  did the members of the Austin City Council obtain their individual offices?
[41:22.000 --> 41:24.000]  What's the answer?
[41:24.000 --> 41:27.000]  Elected, of course, and anyone that was appointed
[41:27.000 --> 41:32.000]  would have had to have been appointed during an absentee in a seat
[41:32.000 --> 41:34.000]  for some emergency purpose.
[41:34.000 --> 41:40.000]  Someone got killed, someone died, they got charged with a crime
[41:40.000 --> 41:42.000]  and had to give up their seat.
[41:42.000 --> 41:46.000]  Any reasons why they would have to hold either an A, emergency election,
[41:46.000 --> 41:49.000]  or B, an emergency appointment to fill that seat.
[41:49.000 --> 41:54.000]  This specifically says that if they're elected or appointed,
[41:54.000 --> 41:57.000]  Section 19 makes it very clear if it's either of those,
[41:57.000 --> 42:00.000]  they're still ineligible to the legislature.
[42:00.000 --> 42:03.000]  So whatever their answer to question one,
[42:03.000 --> 42:07.000]  they're either elected or they're appointed, they're bound.
[42:07.000 --> 42:13.000]  If they want to argue they're acting as a political subdivision of the state.
[42:13.000 --> 42:18.000]  Two, if they are elected to their office and are allegedly functioning
[42:18.000 --> 42:22.000]  as a political subdivision thereof, i.e. as state actors
[42:22.000 --> 42:26.000]  performing official state acts, then why are you arguing
[42:26.000 --> 42:32.000]  that they are not a person holding a lucrative office under this state?
[42:32.000 --> 42:36.000]  And thus they would be ineligible to be sitting in the Texas legislature
[42:36.000 --> 42:40.000]  at the same time as they are sitting as paid members of the city council.
[42:40.000 --> 42:42.000]  They're going to flip on you.
[42:42.000 --> 42:46.000]  No, I'm not arguing that they are acting under the state.
[42:46.000 --> 42:47.000]  Great.
[42:47.000 --> 42:52.000]  Question number three, I completely agree with you that they are not acting
[42:52.000 --> 42:54.000]  as members of the legislature,
[42:54.000 --> 42:59.000]  nor are they acting under any constitutionally delegated state authority
[42:59.000 --> 43:03.000]  when acting solely as members of the Austin City Council
[43:03.000 --> 43:07.000]  for the purposes of this ordinance.
[43:07.000 --> 43:12.000]  Therefore, it would be constitutionally impossible for it to have the force
[43:12.000 --> 43:17.000]  and effect of binding public law as that power is delegated only
[43:17.000 --> 43:23.000]  to the legislature who cannot re-delegate it to someone else through legislation.
[43:23.000 --> 43:34.000]  Pursue it, Article 1, Section 29, and Article 3, Clause 1.
[43:34.000 --> 43:36.000]  Article 3, Section 1 gives them the power.
[43:36.000 --> 43:40.000]  Article 1, Section 29 says any law or attempt to make a law
[43:40.000 --> 43:45.000]  that violates any provision of the Constitution violates the Constitution
[43:45.000 --> 43:49.000]  and it's void, can't hold water.
[43:49.000 --> 43:52.000]  And we're going to deal a little bit more with Article 1, Section 29,
[43:52.000 --> 43:56.000]  on the other side when it comes to the other things that are in the definition of law.
[43:56.000 --> 44:00.000]  So y'all hang on.
[44:00.000 --> 44:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.000 --> 44:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[44:07.000 --> 44:12.000]  The affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how
[44:12.000 --> 44:15.000]  in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:38.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:47.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[44:47.000 --> 44:52.000]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 44:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[44:56.000 --> 45:01.000]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:07.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com,
[45:07.000 --> 45:11.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street,
[45:11.000 --> 45:13.000]  Sweet D, here in Austin, Texas.
[45:13.000 --> 45:16.000]  I'm Brave New Books and Chase Banks to see all our fantastic health
[45:16.000 --> 45:19.000]  and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:25.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products,
[45:25.000 --> 45:31.000]  including our all-shellium emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:38.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:48.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.000 --> 46:15.000]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:15.000 --> 46:23.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:23.000 --> 46:26.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:26.000 --> 46:27.000]  All right.
[46:27.000 --> 46:30.000]  Now, in order to understand the rest of what we're going to talk about here,
[46:30.000 --> 46:34.000]  you need to understand two of these definitions that appear here.
[46:34.000 --> 46:36.000]  One is in the Texas Local Government Code.
[46:36.000 --> 46:39.000]  It's in 361.021.
[46:39.000 --> 46:43.000]  In that section, the definition of law is this.
[46:43.000 --> 46:46.000]  In this subchapter, remember what that means.
[46:46.000 --> 46:47.000]  That is its scope.
[46:47.000 --> 46:50.000]  That is the limit of its application.
[46:50.000 --> 46:58.000]  This definition of law applies only in this subchapter of the Texas Local Government Code.
[46:58.000 --> 47:03.000]  Go look at what subchapter 361.021 is in.
[47:03.000 --> 47:10.000]  That subject matter is the specific limitation of that term.
[47:10.000 --> 47:13.000]  It can't be applied to anything else.
[47:13.000 --> 47:16.000]  So listen carefully to the definition.
[47:16.000 --> 47:23.000]  In this subchapter, law means a state statute, a written opinion of a court of record,
[47:23.000 --> 47:27.000]  a municipal ordinance, an order of the commissioner's court of a county,
[47:27.000 --> 47:32.000]  or a rule adopted under a statute.
[47:32.000 --> 47:40.000]  None of that is law in accordance with the Texas Constitution, okay,
[47:40.000 --> 47:45.000]  except potentially the state statute.
[47:45.000 --> 47:55.000]  And that's only if the statute is faithfully rendered in relation to the underlying law that creates it.
[47:55.000 --> 47:59.000]  And it doesn't rewrite itself into something unconstitutional
[47:59.000 --> 48:04.000]  or that is void in the law below it because it isn't there.
[48:04.000 --> 48:09.000]  But the point is, none of the rest of that is law passed by the legislature.
[48:09.000 --> 48:14.000]  Therefore, it is not law as the Constitution recognizes it.
[48:14.000 --> 48:17.000]  This is a statutory definition of law,
[48:17.000 --> 48:28.000]  and it cannot expand the legislative power or any other agency's power over the constitutional limits.
[48:28.000 --> 48:31.000]  Now we have the one in the Texas penal code.
[48:31.000 --> 48:34.000]  This is the one that gets applied across the board
[48:34.000 --> 48:38.000]  according to the way the courts interpret definitions in penal statutes.
[48:38.000 --> 48:40.000]  But here's the problem.
[48:40.000 --> 48:46.000]  The penal code sets the scope for every definition in it specifically to that code.
[48:46.000 --> 48:49.000]  It says, in this code.
[48:49.000 --> 48:52.000]  These terms have this meaning.
[48:52.000 --> 48:56.000]  Therefore, it would be completely unconstitutional for the courts
[48:56.000 --> 49:06.000]  to take those definitions in that code and rule that it is okay to spread those definitions across every other code.
[49:06.000 --> 49:14.000]  Because that would be the court's writing law, and they are not authorized to write law.
[49:14.000 --> 49:18.000]  They can only interpret the law as it is written.
[49:18.000 --> 49:24.000]  Therefore, the only lawful authority they have in relation to those definitions in the penal code
[49:24.000 --> 49:28.000]  is to declare them unconstitutional in relation to anything in that code
[49:28.000 --> 49:37.000]  because the legislature specifically scoped them to that code.
[49:37.000 --> 49:42.000]  But what they did in this definition in the penal code is they wrote it like this.
[49:42.000 --> 49:47.000]  Law means the Constitution or a statute of this state or of the United States.
[49:47.000 --> 49:50.000]  That's the first part of the definition,
[49:50.000 --> 49:54.000]  and I want to discuss that before I move to the next part.
[49:54.000 --> 50:00.000]  When any of these lower court judges tell you the Constitution does not apply in their court
[50:00.000 --> 50:05.000]  according to this definition and the courts ruling that this definition applies across all codes
[50:05.000 --> 50:16.000]  because it's a penal code definition, they are saying the law does not apply in my court.
[50:16.000 --> 50:18.000]  You get that?
[50:18.000 --> 50:26.000]  If the legislature said law means the Constitution of this state or the United States,
[50:26.000 --> 50:32.000]  and the court then says the Constitution does not apply here, we don't use that here, it doesn't matter here,
[50:32.000 --> 50:38.000]  you can't use that here, what they're saying is you cannot use the law in your defense.
[50:38.000 --> 50:45.000]  The highest law they have, and they're saying you can't have it, not in my court.
[50:45.000 --> 50:53.000]  Well, if I can't have that law in their court, how can I have a lesser law in their court?
[50:53.000 --> 50:58.000]  When it is in the same definition, because right here, following this,
[50:58.000 --> 51:02.000]  we have a written opinion of a court of record.
[51:02.000 --> 51:08.000]  So here they're taking an opinion the legislature did not write nor enact nor pass
[51:08.000 --> 51:13.000]  and attempting to declare that as law.
[51:13.000 --> 51:15.000]  That's not in the Constitution either.
[51:15.000 --> 51:19.000]  The Constitution does not give the power to the courts to create law.
[51:19.000 --> 51:28.000]  Therefore, it does not and cannot authorize the legislature to create law from an opinion
[51:28.000 --> 51:34.000]  in a manner other than that required by Article 3.
[51:34.000 --> 51:41.000]  So the courts can't create it either, or they're in violation of Article 1, Section 29,
[51:41.000 --> 51:45.000]  just like the legislature would be.
[51:45.000 --> 51:54.000]  Following the opinion of a court in the definition, we see the following, a municipal ordinance.
[51:54.000 --> 52:00.000]  Following ordinance, we see an order of a county commissioner's court.
[52:00.000 --> 52:09.000]  Following that, we see or a rule authorized by and lawfully adopted under a statute.
[52:09.000 --> 52:18.000]  Now they are declaring all of these things to be law through this definition
[52:18.000 --> 52:27.000]  that Article 3, Section 32 of the Texas Constitution says can never have the force and effect of law
[52:27.000 --> 52:34.000]  because it does not do the things required by Article 3,
[52:34.000 --> 52:39.000]  especially those things required by Article 3, Section 32.
[52:39.000 --> 52:44.000]  Because Article 3, Section 32 is very clear, no bill.
[52:44.000 --> 52:48.000]  And a bill is what the legislature must initiate.
[52:48.000 --> 52:50.000]  It can't be initiated by the city council.
[52:50.000 --> 52:52.000]  It can't be initiated by the county commissioner's court.
[52:52.000 --> 52:59.000]  And all laws in Texas, according to the Constitution, must be passed by bill, which we will see shortly.
[52:59.000 --> 53:07.000]  But the fact is, is that all bills must have several things.
[53:07.000 --> 53:12.000]  And one of those things is that in order for it to have the force and effect of law,
[53:12.000 --> 53:18.000]  it must be read on the floor of each house of the legislature over three several days.
[53:18.000 --> 53:24.000]  And it must have open discussion held thereon.
[53:24.000 --> 53:27.000]  That's a requirement for it to even be a law.
[53:27.000 --> 53:35.000]  Please tell me when a written opinion from a court of record was read over three several days on the floor of each house,
[53:35.000 --> 53:39.000]  open discussion held thereon to agree whether or not the judges were right,
[53:39.000 --> 53:44.000]  and then it was passed into law by the legislature and signed off on by the governor.
[53:44.000 --> 53:46.000]  Did that happen?
[53:46.000 --> 53:50.000]  No, it did not happen.
[53:50.000 --> 53:55.000]  How can a court opinion in Texas be law?
[53:55.000 --> 54:00.000]  It can't, because the courts are not given the power to make law,
[54:00.000 --> 54:07.000]  nor are they given the power to alter the Constitution or the law into something that it isn't.
[54:07.000 --> 54:14.000]  But this, once again, is one of the big problems with having attorneys in every branch of government,
[54:14.000 --> 54:22.000]  which itself is a constitutional violation not only of Article 2, but also of the Bill of Rights.
[54:22.000 --> 54:30.000]  Guess what, people? Article 1, Section 29 that forbids them to violate the Constitution is in the People's Bill of Rights,
[54:30.000 --> 54:33.000]  my personal Bill of Rights.
[54:33.000 --> 54:36.000]  So guess what?
[54:36.000 --> 54:45.000]  Since that is a protected right of the people of Texas being codified in the Constitution within the Bill of Rights,
[54:45.000 --> 54:54.000]  every single one of us has lawful authority in standing to sue for that violation, because that is our right.
[54:54.000 --> 54:57.000]  How can we show harm in order to have standing?
[54:57.000 --> 55:05.000]  Simple, did you attempt to enforce your illegal law against me in any way, shape, or form?
[55:05.000 --> 55:06.000]  Did you write me a citation?
[55:06.000 --> 55:12.000]  Did you summon me illegally and unconstitutionally to appear in your fake court
[55:12.000 --> 55:20.000]  for your fake charge under your fake rules that are not law?
[55:20.000 --> 55:25.000]  If you did, you broke the constitutional limitations of your authority,
[55:25.000 --> 55:36.000]  and I can sue you now because it's in my right to sue you and to hold you accountable.
[55:36.000 --> 55:43.000]  See, why don't we have any attorneys that understand this, that think about this?
[55:43.000 --> 55:50.000]  Why don't any of these so-called law professors at Rice and all these other Sam Houston, A&M,
[55:50.000 --> 55:57.000]  why do none of our law professors read this and apply this exactly as it's written?
[55:57.000 --> 56:05.000]  Why are they saying the court ruled? The court cannot rule because they cannot alter the Constitution.
[56:05.000 --> 56:13.000]  They are not the sole arbiter of what it means, because if they are, it's not a Constitution.
[56:13.000 --> 56:24.000]  If the thing it creates can control what it means, then it means nothing to the thing that it created.
[56:24.000 --> 56:29.000]  How hard is that to understand?
[56:29.000 --> 56:36.000]  Would you have a house full of children and tell them that even though I'm the parent,
[56:36.000 --> 56:40.000]  I'm going to let you guys make all the rules?
[56:40.000 --> 56:44.000]  You're not old enough to make good rules. You're not old enough to make intelligent rules.
[56:44.000 --> 56:48.000]  You're not even old enough and smart enough to understand yet all the things that have to be done on databases,
[56:48.000 --> 56:51.000]  but I'm going to let you make all the rules.
[56:51.000 --> 56:56.000]  Could you possibly be that stupid at home?
[56:56.000 --> 57:01.000]  Then why are you that stupid out in public in life with the rest of us,
[57:01.000 --> 57:05.000]  foisting these idiotic children out here that call themselves representatives,
[57:05.000 --> 57:13.000]  but are absolutely freaking clueless about the rule book they're supposed to play by?
[57:13.000 --> 57:17.000]  Oh, wait, I forgot, because all the elections are rigged,
[57:17.000 --> 57:22.000]  and they're rigged because we don't force them to do everything on a paper ballot,
[57:22.000 --> 57:28.000]  and we don't force them to leave those paper ballots out in the open for all of us to watch 24-7
[57:28.000 --> 57:37.000]  while the election's going on and then force them to count it where we can make sure no one is cheating
[57:37.000 --> 57:42.000]  so that we actually get a representative government,
[57:42.000 --> 57:51.000]  though I'm not really sure based upon the ignoramuses that vote these days that even that's a good idea.
[57:51.000 --> 57:53.000]  So what are we going to do?
[57:53.000 --> 57:56.000]  Well, we haven't even finished reading this yet.
[57:56.000 --> 58:02.000]  And if you haven't gotten further than what I've got here so far, then you're already behind.
[58:02.000 --> 58:06.000]  Come on, folks, this is not brain surgery or rocket science.
[58:06.000 --> 58:09.000]  It's common sense for the most part.
[58:09.000 --> 58:15.000]  It's too bad that that's not as common as it once was.
[58:15.000 --> 58:19.000]  But we're here to help with that if you'll give it a try.
[58:19.000 --> 58:23.000]  So let's try. Let's work together and make this what it needs to be.
[58:23.000 --> 58:27.000]  I'm going to try and finish this up in the next segment when we get back.
[58:27.000 --> 58:30.000]  If not, one more after that and I should be done for sure.
[58:30.000 --> 58:34.000]  So if you're going to call in, not this coming segment, but the one after it,
[58:34.000 --> 58:37.000]  I will turn the phones on and you can call in and get in line.
[58:37.000 --> 58:50.000]  In the meantime, y'all hang in there and we'll be right back after this break.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:54.000 --> 58:58.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:02.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:02.000 --> 59:07.000]  but then the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.000 --> 59:28.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:43.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown,
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:30.000]  The markets for the 4th of January, 2016, opened up with gold at $1,075.61 an ounce, silver $13.89 an ounce,
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:44.000]  Texas crude $37.04 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 433 U.S. currency.
[01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:47.000]  Today in history, Sunday, January 4th, 1903,
[01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  Topsy, a female Asian elephant, was electrocuted to death at Coney Island, New York amusement park.
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:01:01.000]  The killer? Thomas Edison and his D.C. Current during the War of Currents campaign.
[01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  In recent news, Eamon and Ryan Bundy are the apparent leaders of the militia protesters
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  who have taken over and occupied a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon.
[01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:14.000]  The patriotic protesters call themselves citizens for constitutional freedom.
[01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  Their father is the Nevada rancher who was all over the media in 2014
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:23.000]  when he and his supporters had the iconic armed standoff with the Federal Bureau of Land Management.
[01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:29.000]  Eamon Bundy stated today that violence, if it comes our way, will be because government is wanting their building back.
[01:01:29.000 --> 01:01:32.000]  We're putting nobody in harm's way. We're not threatening anybody.
[01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  We're 30 miles out of the closest town. What's all the fuss about?
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:42.000]  Dwight Hamond and his son Stephen are facing jail for apparently setting arson fires that spread to government lands.
[01:01:42.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  These controlled burns were fully supported by the local ranchers for the purpose of preparing the soil
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  for the upcoming planting and harvesting season.
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:53.000]  Of course, 69-year-old Clive and Bundy weighed in on the matter,
[01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  stating that the United States Justice Department has no jurisdiction or authority within the state of Oregon.
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:03.000]  These lands are not under the U.S. treaties of commerce and they are not Article IV territories.
[01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:11.000]  Congress does not have unlimited power.
[01:02:11.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  President Barack Obama stated today concerning executive orders touching upon increased gun controls that,
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  quote, these are not only recommendations that are well within my legal authority and the executive branch,
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:28.000]  but they are also ones that an overwhelmingly majority of American people, including gun owners, support and believe in.
[01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:33.000]  One of the initiatives currently being considered, an executive order defining who's engaging in the business of selling guns,
[01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  which would immediately require some private dealers to obtain a license and begin conducting background checks.
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  Critics are concerned with the precedent this might be setting.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:45.000]  The executive simply has no authority to pass new laws.
[01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  If a majority of Americans support these measures, they would surely be passed in Congress,
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:56.000]  where the people's representatives or delegated power to legislate in the interests of their constituents.
[01:02:56.000 --> 01:03:06.000]  This was the Lowdown for January 4, 2016.
[01:03:06.000 --> 01:03:13.000]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty
[01:03:13.000 --> 01:03:20.000]  I read this book and it says it cares not for the unsightly
[01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:29.000]  These warm unders come by that term rightly
[01:03:29.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  I won't pay for the war with my body
[01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:35.000]  Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money
[01:03:35.000 --> 01:03:39.000]  I won't pay for the fun with my body
[01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:42.000]  Their plans wicked and their logic shoddy
[01:03:42.000 --> 01:03:45.000]  Ain't gonna pay for the war with my money
[01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:49.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:56.000]  Alright, now as I was saying, these definitions make it very, very clear that the legislature is attempting to do something
[01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  that would be unconstitutional if these definitions were applied to the people of Texas.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:08.000]  Because these definitions attempt to foist upon us the appearance of law
[01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:15.000]  for what constitutionally speaking cannot possibly be law.
[01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:22.000]  Now again, as I was saying, the big problem with that is that attorneys are the ones that are responsible for this.
[01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  They occupy all three departments of government.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:28.000]  They control the law writing.
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  They control the law making.
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  They control the executive enforcement of the law as governor, as attorney general.
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:44.000]  In offices they are forbidden to hold because they all have a bar card under the State Bar Act
[01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  which makes them, according to the State Bar Act itself, entitled in Chapter 81 or 82 of the Government Code.
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:54.000]  I forget which, but it's in there in one of them. I think it's 81.
[01:04:54.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  The State Bar Act makes every bar card carrying an attorney a de facto officer of the judiciary.
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:11.000]  Why? Because the Act says the State Bar is created as an administrative office of the judicial department of government.
[01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:15.000]  Therefore, any member of that office belongs in that department.
[01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:22.000]  And they cannot act in any other unless they're going to violate Article 2, separation of powers,
[01:05:22.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  which clearly states no member or group of people or persons, no person or group of persons,
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  from one department of government shall exercise the power and authority belonging to any person or office of any other department.
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:40.000]  It's that simple.
[01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:49.000]  So if they are judicial officers by the fact that they have a bar card, they are forbidden to sit in the legislature as legislators.
[01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:55.000]  They are forbidden to sit as governor, as attorney general. Both of those are executive offices.
[01:05:55.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  Therefore, our legislators that have bar cards and our executive officials that have bar cards are criminals.
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  No ifs, no ands, no buts.
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:22.000]  And those in the judiciary that refuse to acknowledge the Constitution's forbidding of this become criminals as well,
[01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  because they are covering up high crimes and misdemeanors by those in those departments
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  and at the same time protecting them through the judicial courts.
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:44.000]  So as you can see, attorneys have seized control of the entire system,
[01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:53.000]  and they are using it for their own benefit and gain at our expense.
[01:06:53.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  There may not be enough trees in Texas to hang them all, but I am damn sure willing to plant new trees to find out.
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  You should be willing to do the same, because it is your livelihood, your children's livelihood, your parents' livelihood,
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  your grandparents' livelihood, everything you should have had as an inheritance from a productive family business, family piece of land,
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:34.000]  a farm, you name it, has been stolen from you because of the theft, graft, and duplicitous attitudes of these attorneys.
[01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  So my motto is twofold. People ask me, why don't you go to law school and become an attorney?
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  Simple answer, I promised my mother I wouldn't grow up to be a crook.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:56.000]  Okay? My second motto on attorneys is there is nothing wrong with an attorney that a tall tree and a short rope can't fix.
[01:07:56.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  And since most of your legislators are attorneys, imagine how big a wave we could make by making vacant seats in the legislature.
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  But anyway, let's go on with a little lesson here about what the Constitution forbids them to be doing and they are doing.
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:21.000]  We know the definition is invalid because it violates Article 3.
[01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:30.000]  We know it's invalid because it violates Article 1, the Bill of Rights, in Section 29.
[01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:34.000]  Now, let's read Article 3, Section 19.
[01:08:34.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  I'm going to read the whole thing and then I'm going to cut out the parts that are not relevant to this specific area of discussion,
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:45.000]  but then I'm going to read it with only the parts that do apply.
[01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  In its entirety, Section 19 of Article 3 reads, and that's as I said before, that's the ineligibility of persons holding other offices.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  No judge of any court, secretary of state, attorney general, clerk of any court of record,
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:04.000]  or any person holding a lucrative office under the United States or this state or any foreign government
[01:09:04.000 --> 01:09:09.000]  shall during the term for which he is elected or appointed be eligible to the legislature.
[01:09:09.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  So let's paraphrase that down and read it again.
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:17.000]  Section 19 of Article 3, ineligibility of persons holding other offices.
[01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  No person holding a lucrative office under this state shall during the term for which he is elected or appointed be eligible to the legislature.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:33.000]  So now when the city attorney wants to argue, once again, we already went through Question 1,
[01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:41.000]  and we went through Question 2, and we agreed in Question 3 that they are not acting on behalf of the legislature.
[01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:48.000]  They can't be, because if they were, here's the problem we run into.
[01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:53.000]  Since the power to create law is delegated only to the Texas legislature who cannot redelegate it,
[01:09:53.000 --> 01:10:00.000]  anything that the municipalities attempt to create and call bonding public law is a violation of Article 3.
[01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:06.000]  Therefore, it is a violation of Article 1, Section 29.
[01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  And Article 1, Section 29 is in our Bill of Rights.
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:14.000]  Therefore, we have standing to enforce it.
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:18.000]  Article 1, Section 29 very clearly reads the following.
[01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:27.000]  This is verbatim, provisions of Bill of Rights accepted from powers of government to forever remain inviolent,
[01:10:27.000 --> 01:10:32.000]  to guard against transgressions of the high powers herein delegated.
[01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:40.000]  We declare, we is you and me, folks, not the government, not any department, not any office in the government.
[01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:46.000]  We means the people of Texas, the nongovernmental individuals.
[01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:54.000]  We declare that everything in this Bill of Rights is accepted out of the general powers of government
[01:10:54.000 --> 01:10:57.000]  and shall forever remain inviolent.
[01:10:57.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  And all laws contrary thereto or to the following provisions shall be void.
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  Now, what comes after the Bill of Rights?
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  Since it's in Article 1, it would be every other provision of the Texas Constitution.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:21.000]  Therefore, Article 1, Section 29 says you can't violate any piece of the Constitution.
[01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:27.000]  You can't do it by court opinion because it doesn't say the general powers of just the legislature.
[01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  It doesn't say just the general powers of the executive.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  It says the general powers of government as a whole.
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:37.000]  What are the three branches' individual powers?
[01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  The court's individual power is the ability to interpret law.
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:47.000]  The legislator's general power is to enact law.
[01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  The executive's is to enforce law.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  Therefore, they cannot use under Article 1, Section 29, any of those general powers in violation of the Constitution.
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  Legislature can't create law that violates it.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:07.000]  The executive cannot create policies and procedures for enforcement that violates it.
[01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:14.000]  And the judicial cannot create opinions that violate it.
[01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  Yet every single one of these things exist a multitude of ways in Texas because you don't know what the hell is going on.
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  You didn't make the time and the effort to read the Texas Constitution for yourself or even understand it,
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  much less to argue with your public servants and your representatives when they come through your district
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  about why they're allowing these things to happen when that is not within their power to do.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:56.000]  Why does your representative represent only himself and not you?
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:12:59.000]  Because he doesn't care about you, not any more than an attorney does.
[01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  The attorney cares about whether or not you can pay him.
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:08.000]  And you will only get the amount of fight that you can pay for.
[01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:12.000]  Your representative is no less.
[01:13:12.000 --> 01:13:16.000]  He has a very small amount of money to act as a representative.
[01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  So his only way really of making money as a representative here in Texas is to make laws that benefit his friends and his business friends.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  Think about that.
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:39.000]  Texas does not pay a salary to representatives or to senators, or at least we didn't used to.
[01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:42.000]  It used to be forbidden by the Constitution.
[01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:45.000]  But the point is whatever it is, it ain't much.
[01:13:45.000 --> 01:13:50.000]  And it certainly is not enough for them to call that a paycheck.
[01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:52.000]  They couldn't live on it.
[01:13:52.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  So what do they do when they get elected?
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  They make sure that when they leave office, they benefit, and everything they enact is intended to do exactly that.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:06.000]  Bet on it.
[01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:09.000]  If you don't believe it, go look at what most of them are invested in.
[01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:11.000]  Go look at what kind of businesses they own.
[01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:24.000]  Go look at what other industries attach to their business that if that industry thrives, so do they, like a cancerous tumor.
[01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:31.000]  They're not represented, not at all.
[01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:32.000]  All right.
[01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:37.000]  So now that we understand that the Bill of Rights gives us the authority to challenge this, why aren't we?
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:40.000]  Because you still don't understand it.
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:44.000]  So let's ask these questions of the city attorney about their so-called ordinance.
[01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:58.000]  Does the alleged ordinance enactment fully comply and comport with Article 3, Section 29 of the Texas Constitution, and remain inviolent of Article 1, Section 29 of the Bill of Rights?
[01:14:58.000 --> 01:15:01.000]  Now what does Section 29 of Article 3 say?
[01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:03.000]  Enacting Clause of Laws.
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  The enacting clause of all laws shall be, be it enacted by the legislature of the state of Texas.
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  Now Mr. City Attorney, does your city ordinance say, be it enacted by the legislature of the state of Texas?
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  No, it does not, because it was not enacted by the legislature of the state of Texas.
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:23.000]  Therefore, it fails the constitutional test under Article 3, Section 29.
[01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:25.000]  Let's move on.
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  Does the alleged ordinance enactment fully comply and comport with Article 3, Section 30 of the Texas Constitution, and remain inviolent of Article 1, Section 29 of the Bill of Rights?
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  What does Section 30 say?
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  Laws passed by bill.
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:41.000]  Amendments changing purpose.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:45.000]  No law shall be passed except by bill.
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  Well, Mr. City Attorney, was your ordinance passed by a legislative bill?
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:51.000]  No, it was not.
[01:15:51.000 --> 01:15:54.000]  Oh, well it fails that first provision.
[01:15:54.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  And no bill shall be so amended in its passage through either house as to change its original purpose.
[01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:02.000]  Excuse me, Mr. City Attorney.
[01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  Does the city council have separate houses?
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:07.000]  And are those houses the Senate?
[01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:12.000]  And are those houses the House of Representatives in the Texas legislature?
[01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  No, then it fails Article 3, doesn't it?
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:28.000]  Does the alleged ordinance enactment fully comply and comport with Article 3, Section 31 of the Texas Constitution, and remain inviolent of Article 1, Section 29 of the Bill of Rights?
[01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  Section 31 of Article 3 of the Texas Constitution reads this way, which we will cover when we get back after this break.
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  So y'all hang in there, I've only got a little more ranting to do before I can start taking your calls.
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  I am going to go ahead, since we got through this segment, I'm going to turn the phones on so y'all can get in line.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  So if you've got any questions, queries, comments, or complaints, get in line and I'll get to you when we get to you.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:18.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polynburst.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  We broker Metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440. We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Order now.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:39.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:39.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:43.000]  All right, let's get through this and see what we have.
[01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:47.000]  Now, as I was saying, Article 3, Section 31.
[01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:53.000]  We just said Section 30 says that all laws in Texas have to be passed by bill.
[01:19:53.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  Must be passed by bill.
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:58.000]  That is a constitutional requirement.
[01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:03.000]  Section 31, origination in either house and amendment.
[01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  Bills may originate in either house.
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:08.000]  So let's add that together.
[01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  One, all laws must be passed by bill.
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  Two, all bills must originate in one of the houses of the legislature.
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:22.000]  Does the City Council comply with any of that?
[01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  No.
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:30.000]  And when passed by such house, may be amended, altered, or rejected by the other.
[01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  Does the City Council have the power to pass it?
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:34.000]  No.
[01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:37.000]  Do they have the power to amend it, alter it, or reject it?
[01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:38.000]  No.
[01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:43.000]  Well, obviously, they're not acting as a legislature then, are they?
[01:20:43.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  Does the alleged ordinance enactment fully comply and comport with Article 3, Section 32 of the Texas Constitution,
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:54.000]  and remain in violation of Article 1, Section 29 of the Bill of Rights of Same?
[01:20:54.000 --> 01:20:56.000]  Section 32.
[01:20:56.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  We discussed this.
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:11.000]  Reading on three several-day suspension of rule, no bill shall have the force of a law until it has been read on three several days in each house,
[01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  and free discussion allowed thereon.
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:19.000]  Does your ordinance comply with that?
[01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:20.000]  No?
[01:21:20.000 --> 01:21:24.000]  Then it fails the Section 32 test.
[01:21:24.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  Guess what, folks?
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:33.000]  So does the recodification in 1995 by the 74th legislature of the entire Texas Transportation Code,
[01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  because it also was not read on the floor of each house.
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:43.000]  It was passed under a fraudulent emergency clause that does not appear anywhere within the Constitution,
[01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  and that emergency clause that was used is a direct violation of Article 3, Section 62 of the Texas Constitution.
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:58.000]  Therefore, by not complying with Article 3, Section 32 or 62,
[01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:04.000]  the Texas legislature defrauded the people of Texas of proper representation at that level,
[01:22:04.000 --> 01:22:13.000]  as well as of their money through a statutory scheme that was unconstitutionally enacted for revenue generation.
[01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  How you like them apples?
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:20.000]  Now, number eight.
[01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  Does the alleged ordinance enactment fully comply and comport with Article 3, Section 33 of the Texas Constitution,
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  while remaining in violation of Article 1, Section 29 of the Bill of Rights?
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  Section 33, Revenue Bills.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:39.000]  Okay.
[01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  Do you see anything in that language that says that a municipality or a county is authorized to generate revenue?
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  I'll wait.
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:00.000]  So let me get this, tie this together here.
[01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  Section 30, no law shall be passed except by bill.
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  Section 31, a bill may only originate in either house of the legislature.
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:17.000]  Section 33, all bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
[01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:27.000]  At no time in any place do any of us see any words allowing a municipality to set taxes.
[01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  That would be for the purpose of raising revenue, wouldn't it?
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  That would mean the legislature would be the only place that could set a bill to collect revenue for taxes for any reason,
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  because it doesn't break up any reasons here.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:46.000]  It says all bills for revenue.
[01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:51.000]  So if the state is getting any of that money or is authorizing any of that money,
[01:23:51.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  the only way they can do it is through a revenue bill.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  Yet you see municipalities and counties setting taxes on property that is not only untaxable
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:09.000]  under the Texas Constitution to begin with, or any other constitution for that matter,
[01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  but they're generating revenue through fines, fees, and everything else using ordinances that are not law.
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  And we're looking right here at the Constitution to prove they're not law.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:30.000]  They can't possibly be law.
[01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:31.000]  Let's continue on.
[01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  Question number nine to the city attorney.
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  Does the alleged ordinance enactment fully comply and comport with Article 3, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:46.000]  and remain in violation of Article 1, Section 29 of the Bill of Rights?
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  Section 34 of Article 3 read, defeated bills and resolutions.
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  After a bill has been considered and defeated by either house of the legislature,
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  no bill containing the same substance shall be passed into a law during the same session.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:04.000]  After a resolution has been acted on and defeated,
[01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  no resolution containing the same substance shall be considered at the same session.
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  Yet we have seen numerous times that the legislature creates two bills for everything they want to pass.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  If one bill dies, the other one still passes through and gets enacted,
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  even though right here we see a provision that says you cannot have multiple bills dealing with the same subject.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  Yet we know for a fact they do.
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:36.000]  How can we prove that?
[01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:37.000]  I'll tell you, very simple.
[01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  We're going to use the exact same thing of the transportation code
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:49.000]  because the documentation that I have from the official legislative website,
[01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  the PDF that you can download of the bill as it was allegedly enacted,
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:26:00.000]  it's signed off by everybody, by the house of representatives, the speaker of each house, by the governor.
[01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:03.000]  It shows that that is the actual enrolled bill.
[01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  And yet the certified copies of those specific pages of that bill that I requested from the secretary of state
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:23.000]  and received for SB 971, they have different page numbers on them for the same thing.
[01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:27.000]  What I have is the signature page by these representatives and the governor,
[01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  and I have the emergency clause page.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  Well, on my copy that I downloaded from the legislative website,
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:42.000]  the page numbers are not matching up with the page numbers on the certified copies from the secretary of state.
[01:26:42.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  They're completely different.
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  So how can that possibly be unless there was two bills?
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:50.000]  How can there be a bill the secretary of state is certifying
[01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  and it not be the bill that I've got that says it was signed unless they're using two bills?
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:01.000]  See the problem?
[01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  Now, number 10, Mr. City Attorney.
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:11.000]  Does the alleged ordinance enactment fully comply and comport with Article 3, Section 35 of the Texas Constitution
[01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:15.000]  and still remain in violation of Article 1, Section 29 of the Bill of Rights?
[01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  Well, let's see.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  Section 35, subjects and titles of bills.
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:25.000]  A, no bill except general appropriation bills which may embrace the various subjects and accounts
[01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  for and on account of which monies are appropriated shall contain more than one subject.
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  Was your ordinance passed by the city council containing more than one subject?
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:39.000]  And even if it wasn't, they're still not members of the legislature, right?
[01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:44.000]  It still has failed every constitutional provision up to this point, has it not?
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:45.000]  It has, yes.
[01:27:45.000 --> 01:27:46.000]  Okay, good.
[01:27:46.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  Let's continue on.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:53.000]  So not only is it limited to a single subject for that bill, then you have subsection B,
[01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:59.000]  the rules or procedure of each house shall require that the subject of each bill be expressed in its title
[01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  in a manner that gives the legislature and the public reasonable notice of that subject.
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  The legislature is solely responsible for determining compliance with the rule.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  Okay, so they're supposed to make rules that make sure that the title tells us what the bill deals with
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:18.000]  as far as its subject matter.
[01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  SB 971 for the transportation code tells us very, very clearly the subject matter is transportation.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:29.000]  Nothing else.
[01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  Everything in the transportation code must fall within the subject matter umbrella of transportation
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  in order to apply to anyone.
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:48.000]  Therefore, the state by legislative enactment must first prove that transportation was at issue
[01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:54.000]  and being engaged in before any statute in that code could apply to anyone.
[01:28:54.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  No proof of transportation, no jurisdiction because there is no subject matter.
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:02.000]  No subject matter, no subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:05.000]  Therefore, no impersonal jurisdiction.
[01:29:05.000 --> 01:29:11.000]  Therefore, every prosecution without proof of subject matter jurisdiction is illegal.
[01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  It's unconstitutional.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:15.000]  It is void.
[01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  But your courts keep selling you out by changing and switching terminology to an unconstitutional code
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:31.000]  in violation of your protected rights and the Texas Constitution itself as we are seeing firsthand right here.
[01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  They have a very big problem.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  They don't want to address it because it means billions of dollars a year in lost revenue
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  that they're currently able to steal from us as long as we remain ignorant, stupid, and blind.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  I am not willing to remain that way and have not been for a long time.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  You need to be making up your mind, folks.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:30:02.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  Why do Americans order extra large portions of food when smaller servings would suffice?
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and in a moment I'll share an interesting new study
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  that may shed some light on the psychology of overeating.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:20.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:30.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:30.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:36.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:40.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:44.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:46.000]  Food is one of life's great pleasures,
[01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  but too much can lead to a host of problems like heart disease and diabetes.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:54.000]  So why do Americans keep opting for enormous food portions?
[01:30:54.000 --> 01:30:58.000]  Northwestern University researchers think it has to do with class consciousness.
[01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  Like cars and TVs, Americans equate larger food portions with higher social status.
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  People told researchers that drinking a large coffee meant someone was probably wealthier
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  than someone else drinking a small size, even when the price was the same.
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:17.000]  So it follows that people who are feeling poor may try to compensate with bigger portions.
[01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  Sure enough, in experiments, lower-income folks were more likely to go for gut-buster sizes.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:03.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:09.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails,
[01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:17.000]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements
[01:32:17.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:26.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:12.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:12.000 --> 01:33:32.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:34.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:36.000]  All right, let's see if we can wrap this up here real quick.
[01:33:36.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  We're down to the last three of these anyway,
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  so I'm just going to read these without having to ask the question.
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:45.000]  But just remember, each one of these is being addressed to the city attorney
[01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:49.000]  to ask the simple question relating to the constitutional section we're dealing with.
[01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  Article 3, Section 36, we read that, or we haven't read that.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  Revival or amendment by reference, reenactment, and publication at length.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:02.000]  No law shall be revived or amended by reference to its title.
[01:34:02.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  But in such case, the act revived or the section or sections amended
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  shall be reenacted and published at length.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:14.000]  Now, this does not say that they cannot revive a particular law
[01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  that may have expired or been repealed prior,
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  but they cannot do it simply by referencing its title in a new enactment.
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  If they're going to resurrect it, they have to do so in its entirety
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  through all the proper process.
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  That's what this actually means.
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  Section 37, reference to committee and report.
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  No bill shall be considered.
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  In other words, you write your bill to become a law,
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:46.000]  but it can't go through any of the other processes we've talked about
[01:34:46.000 --> 01:34:49.000]  from Section 30 all the way down to here
[01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  unless it has been first referred to a committee and reported thereon,
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:34:59.000]  and no bill shall be passed, which has not been presented
[01:34:59.000 --> 01:35:02.000]  and referred to and reported from a committee
[01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  at least three days before the final adjournment of the legislature.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  So there you go.
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:11.000]  Once again, all laws must be enacted by a bill.
[01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:16.000]  All bills must originate in one of the two houses of the legislature, okay?
[01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  And so on and so on and so on.
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:21.000]  It is all chained together.
[01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  There is no question as to whether or not anything done by a city council
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  or a county commissioner's court is constitutionally valid law.
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:34.000]  That flat out is not.
[01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  But we can see in the very last section here, 38,
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:41.000]  signing bills and joint resolution entry on journals.
[01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:45.000]  The presiding officer of each house shall,
[01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:48.000]  in the presence of the house over which he presides,
[01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  sign all bills and joint resolutions passed by the legislature
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:57.000]  after their titles have been publicly read before signing,
[01:35:57.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  and the fact of signing shall be entered on the journals.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  Was your city ordinance enacted and read in such a way
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:07.000]  and entered upon the journals of the legislature, Mr. City Attorney?
[01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:14.000]  No, then it's not a valid frickin' law, you key-totaling moron.
[01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:24.000]  If you went and paid 100 grand for your law degree, you are a blithering idiot.
[01:36:24.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  How could your parents raise such a moron to survive this many years?
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:33.000]  You can't read the constitution itself,
[01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:38.000]  but you're going to claim to understand a damn statute that doesn't comply,
[01:36:38.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  a city ordinance that doesn't comply, as if somehow you're right and I'm wrong?
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:50.000]  I would call that egotistical beyond all belief.
[01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:56.000]  When you think your statute or your ordinance or your perception trumps the black and white
[01:36:56.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  of the constitution upon which I rely to call you the moron you are.
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  So just remember that when any judge in any court attempts to say,
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:13.000]  we don't use the constitution here, one, they're saying we don't use law here,
[01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:19.000]  and two, that deprives them of any and all jurisdiction the moment they do it.
[01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  You need to object, and you need to get rid of this judge.
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:25.000]  Objection, move for your disqualification.
[01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  That statement is an act of treason and sedition against the Texas Constitution,
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  a violation of the rights of the individual accused before this court,
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  and it violates everything within the constitution itself in relation to your duties.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  You're excused.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  Go play with your frickin' blocks.
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  Don't ever come back.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  I'm going to get you disbarred and sanctioned.
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:52.000]  And then you go about whatever you can to make their life a living hell from that day forward.
[01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:54.000]  Stand out front with a sign.
[01:37:54.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  I don't care.
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:37:56.000]  Put their name on it.
[01:37:56.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  Hey, this moron thinks they're a judge.
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:04.000]  If you go in this court, disqualify them out of habit
[01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:13.000]  because they're too stupid to be allowed to live, much less decide your fate.
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:19.000]  Mr. Earing Boy down here at the Austin Municipal Court, Alfred Jenkins,
[01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:23.000]  if you're listening, you're an idiot.
[01:38:23.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  Not only that, you're a corrupt idiot.
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:36.000]  And I will eventually see your corrupt ass in jail along with everyone like you,
[01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:43.000]  even if I have to run for governor myself to put it there.
[01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  Guess what, folks?
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:49.000]  I can't do that by myself any more than you can.
[01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:55.000]  If you're not going to take a hand in your own destiny, you deserve exactly what you get.
[01:38:55.000 --> 01:39:02.000]  But I will not allow your willingness to be swept away before these morons
[01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:06.000]  to force me to go with you.
[01:39:06.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  I am just not going to do that.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:13.000]  They will have to kill me dead in the dirt first.
[01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:21.000]  You do what you think is right for you, but that's the only thing that's right for me.
[01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  I will not go quietly into that good night.
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  And when I do go, I am taking some ass with me. Bet on it.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  You need to figure out who you are, what you are, and who they are,
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:47.000]  and make them understand they are not superior, they are not supreme,
[01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:50.000]  they are not the master.
[01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:55.000]  And the moment they get any inkling of that misconception in their heads,
[01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:00.000]  they should not be in a public office.
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:03.000]  The moment you have a man or woman seeking a public office
[01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  that tells you in any way through their actions, their demeanor, or their statements
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:17.000]  that they deserve to be elected, that is exactly the person you do not want.
[01:40:17.000 --> 01:40:22.000]  Nobody deserves to be elected to serve the public.
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  It is a privilege to serve the public.
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:29.000]  It's not something someone deserves to do.
[01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  It's something that they should want to do, but no one deserves it.
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:39.000]  That is a true privilege, if there has ever been a privilege on the planet,
[01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  is to do public service from a public office.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  You and I do not have or exercise privileges in our day-to-day life.
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  And the moment you fully realize that will be the only moment in your life you are truly free.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:09.000]  The moment you refuse to go back from that will be the only time in your life
[01:41:09.000 --> 01:41:16.000]  that you have chosen to remain free.
[01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  Like everything else, it's a choice.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:22.000]  And it will not be a choice without cost.
[01:41:22.000 --> 01:41:24.000]  If you think it will, you're mistaken.
[01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  And if you think the cost isn't worth it, maybe it's not to you.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  But don't sit there and cast aspersions on me, because I believe that it does.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  And I take the necessary action to do something about it.
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  Your cowardice is not my problem.
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:55.000]  And it sure as hell is not going to be the basis of my downfall, at least not without a fight.
[01:41:55.000 --> 01:41:57.000]  Decision time.
[01:41:57.000 --> 01:41:59.000]  Do they own you or not?
[01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  Figure it out.
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:03.000]  All right.
[01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:05.000]  Well, that said, oh, I've got less than two minutes until the next break.
[01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:11.000]  So I will pick up callers and get through you guys as fast as I can on our last segment, which is coming up.
[01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:13.000]  I don't have time really to get this rolling.
[01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  But I'm going to try.
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:17.000]  I know what one question is going to be.
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  So Andrew in Pennsylvania, give us the question.
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  Yeah, Eddie, Randy White spoke to him last Friday.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  He's never actually tried to force a diversity jurisdiction issue like the case that I have in Arizona.
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:33.000]  You brought that up.
[01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:40.000]  OK, on the document they sent you, have they sent you an actual file complaint yet?
[01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  Yeah, it says come to court.
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:44.000]  No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
[01:42:44.000 --> 01:42:50.000]  A complaint, Andrew, a signed complaint charging you with an offense.
[01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  Something that says the state of Arizona versus or the people of Arizona versus.
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  Yes, yes, yes, yes.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  What does it say?
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:04.000]  I see a complaint has been filed in this court against you, charging that in Maricopa County.
[01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:09.000]  In whose name was it filed?
[01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:11.000]  My name, Andrew.
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:13.000]  No, Andrew, it's not filed in your name.
[01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:15.000]  You're the one they're accusing.
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:20.000]  What name are they using?
[01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  Are they using the state of Arizona or the people of Arizona?
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:26.000]  The state of Arizona.
[01:43:26.000 --> 01:43:32.000]  OK, what does the federal Constitution say about any case involving a state?
[01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  It has to be commercial.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  No, it does not.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  Where the hell does it say that?
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:40.000]  Where does it say that?
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  Hang on, we'll get back here in just a second.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  Alright, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll be right back on the other side, so y'all hang in there.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Sorry.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:07.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  What?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:16.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[01:44:16.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:22.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found
[01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity,
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  but there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:38.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading
[01:44:38.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:46.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:50.000]  then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:44:56.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include
[01:44:56.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:08.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:08.000 --> 01:45:11.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:11.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:31.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:48.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:48.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:01.000 --> 01:46:30.000] ...
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:41.040]  All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. All right. Now, we are talking
[01:46:41.040 --> 01:46:45.400]  to Andrew here. And all right, Andrew, go ahead.
[01:46:45.400 --> 01:46:49.800]  This is a criminal case. This is a criminal case. They're saying they're a plaintiff.
[01:46:49.800 --> 01:46:53.800]  That's a civil issue. That's what you're trying to tell me, right?
[01:46:53.800 --> 01:46:59.560]  Well, again, if they're saying plaintiff, yeah, normally that's civil. But you said
[01:46:59.560 --> 01:47:03.560]  that according to what you read, it's criminal, which is it?
[01:47:03.560 --> 01:47:06.400]  Yeah. What does the document say that you read
[01:47:06.400 --> 01:47:12.080]  from just a second ago? If that a complaint has been filed against
[01:47:12.080 --> 01:47:18.520]  you charging that in America- What kind of complaint? A civil complaint
[01:47:18.520 --> 01:47:24.480]  or a criminal complaint? Well, okay, this is why I'm kind of lost
[01:47:24.480 --> 01:47:28.880]  here because it says that the crime is a criminal crime, but they say they're a plaintiff in
[01:47:28.880 --> 01:47:36.120]  regards to the plaintiff versus defendant. So it's a contradiction.
[01:47:36.120 --> 01:47:43.200]  What does the charging instrument they sent you say it is?
[01:47:43.200 --> 01:47:52.120]  The summons. That is not a charging instrument, Andrew.
[01:47:52.120 --> 01:47:57.560]  A charging instrument is an indictment by a grand jury, an information by a prosecuting
[01:47:57.560 --> 01:48:02.160]  attorney or a signed sworn criminal complaint, depending upon what type of allegation and
[01:48:02.160 --> 01:48:10.360]  the rules of the particular state. Did they send you one of those?
[01:48:10.360 --> 01:48:18.960]  It's from the county attorney. Okay. That also does not answer my question.
[01:48:18.960 --> 01:48:23.880]  We don't give a crap who mailed it. We don't give a crap whose name is on it.
[01:48:23.880 --> 01:48:35.800]  We give a crap about what it says it is. It says it is a summon.
[01:48:35.800 --> 01:48:38.880]  In other words, is that the only document you've got?
[01:48:38.880 --> 01:48:46.960]  Yeah. Then the answer to my question is what?
[01:48:46.960 --> 01:48:51.600]  They sent me a letter in the mail. That's what they sent me.
[01:48:51.600 --> 01:49:00.200]  The answer to my question is no, they didn't. You don't have any document that says they're
[01:49:00.200 --> 01:49:04.960]  vested with a jurisdiction. A summons doesn't grant them jurisdiction, Andrew.
[01:49:04.960 --> 01:49:09.400]  Where the hell is the complaint or the information or the indictment?
[01:49:09.400 --> 01:49:13.160]  Where is it? It's not here.
[01:49:13.160 --> 01:49:17.080]  Thank you. Therefore, you have not been given proper notice,
[01:49:17.080 --> 01:49:20.000]  have you? No.
[01:49:20.000 --> 01:49:26.480]  I can file a motion to dismiss stating the state of Arizona has given me nothing saying
[01:49:26.480 --> 01:49:33.320]  I have been charged with anything. Therefore, there is insufficient improper notice
[01:49:33.320 --> 01:49:37.680]  in relation to the allegations against me, whether they be civil or criminal.
[01:49:37.680 --> 01:49:43.400]  I move to dismiss. I already did that back in October with those
[01:49:43.400 --> 01:49:44.560]  doctors and counselors. Really?
[01:49:44.560 --> 01:49:54.640]  You said that in what you sent, you're sure? Yeah, I took out all the Texas laws and just
[01:49:54.640 --> 01:49:57.560]  left the federal laws in. Yeah, I sent-
[01:49:57.560 --> 01:50:04.560]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, you left the what in? No, I took out all the Texas laws and
[01:50:04.560 --> 01:50:08.880]  Randy Galton's, I'm sure it's in Britain's document and just tweaked it around a bit
[01:50:08.880 --> 01:50:14.160]  to get in a motion to dismiss for due process violation, a removal of traffic case, and
[01:50:14.160 --> 01:50:16.680]  everything. Okay, all right, I'm going to sum this up
[01:50:16.680 --> 01:50:19.720]  real easy, real quick here. You're not going to like this, but I'm going
[01:50:19.720 --> 01:50:23.320]  to do this anyway. This is for everyone else to pay attention
[01:50:23.320 --> 01:50:31.920]  to. Rule number one, read the rules of the game
[01:50:31.920 --> 01:50:37.440]  in whatever state you're fixing to have to go defend yourself in.
[01:50:37.440 --> 01:50:44.240]  That's a given, should be, okay? An oyster would know that.
[01:50:44.240 --> 01:50:50.120]  Number two, challenge everything they do using those rules.
[01:50:50.120 --> 01:50:55.000]  But how are you going to do number two if you fail to do number one?
[01:50:55.000 --> 01:51:00.320]  This is due diligence, people. You have to help yourself.
[01:51:00.320 --> 01:51:04.520]  Stop waiting on damn osmosis process to put it in your brain.
[01:51:04.520 --> 01:51:13.780]  Go read something that's useful. Number three, you do one and two through written
[01:51:13.780 --> 01:51:21.000]  process and pleadings so that there is a valid fundamental written record of everything that's
[01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:27.760]  transpired so that when you go to appeal from these kangaroo courts, there have been properly
[01:51:27.760 --> 01:51:33.900]  documented objections to everything they've done.
[01:51:33.900 --> 01:51:41.880]  If you cannot on your own do these three things, pay the damn ticket and go back to doing whatever
[01:51:41.880 --> 01:51:48.880]  you do at home because you will be completely incapable of helping yourself standing up
[01:51:48.880 --> 01:51:57.840]  all alone in a courtroom. I get all kinds of requests for help and information,
[01:51:57.840 --> 01:52:03.080]  but I can spend five minutes talking with you and tell you, you need to just pay the
[01:52:03.080 --> 01:52:05.920]  ticket. You don't stand a snowball chance in a microwave
[01:52:05.920 --> 01:52:16.560]  oven of getting out of that courtroom alive. You just don't.
[01:52:16.560 --> 01:52:22.720]  The distance is irrelevant. Everything they have is online just like it is here.
[01:52:22.720 --> 01:52:29.040]  Don't give me that horse crap. I know better. I look it up all the time. You can too.
[01:52:29.040 --> 01:52:38.120]  I'm not buying it. Do your due diligence, every last one of you.
[01:52:38.120 --> 01:52:43.280]  When you fail to do that, you don't only screw yourself, you screw everybody that's coming
[01:52:43.280 --> 01:52:50.200]  behind you. Stop waiting for the answers to come from
[01:52:50.200 --> 01:53:00.080]  someone else. You will be disappointed with the outcome when they can't sit there and
[01:53:00.080 --> 01:53:08.640]  hold your hand 100% of the time. If you don't know enough to fight, stop pissing
[01:53:08.640 --> 01:53:12.520]  in the ring because you're scared to death for somebody else to come in and have to slip
[01:53:12.520 --> 01:53:18.320]  on. Or getting yourself beats the damn bloody that
[01:53:18.320 --> 01:53:22.340]  everybody else is standing in the pool of your blood wondering why they're risking the
[01:53:22.340 --> 01:53:29.240]  time to spill their own. Your defeat hurts other people when you do
[01:53:29.240 --> 01:53:38.640]  so in a manner that proves you were not prepared. I cannot put this any more plainly than that.
[01:53:38.640 --> 01:53:43.400]  You cannot use the Texas stuff in Arizona. You need to know what the hell applies in
[01:53:43.400 --> 01:53:50.640]  Arizona. How many times do I say that on this show? I am not an expert in your state law.
[01:53:50.640 --> 01:53:57.040]  It should work like this, but you need to find the law that says that's what it is.
[01:53:57.040 --> 01:54:03.040]  If you can't do that, pay the damn ticket or go get yourself an attorney who will just
[01:54:03.040 --> 01:54:07.920]  take your money anyway, but at least you'll feel better about it.
[01:54:07.920 --> 01:54:15.040]  Thank you, Eddie. Sorry, man. I'd tell you more, but there
[01:54:15.040 --> 01:54:18.880]  isn't any more to tell you. If you haven't spent any time at all and all the time since
[01:54:18.880 --> 01:54:22.960]  you got that citation doing these things, how the hell would you do anything out there
[01:54:22.960 --> 01:54:27.220]  anyway? How is anyone going to help you when they don't know any more than you do about
[01:54:27.220 --> 01:54:30.720]  what's going on? I don't have time to sit down and become an
[01:54:30.720 --> 01:54:36.320]  expert in every state's laws. I don't. I wished I could, but do I look like Commander
[01:54:36.320 --> 01:54:42.960]  Data? No. Right, and when they send me back the bail
[01:54:42.960 --> 01:54:48.440]  money, that let me... I don't think the case was dropped entirely, but that was not the
[01:54:48.440 --> 01:54:51.240]  case. That could have just simply have been a clerical
[01:54:51.240 --> 01:54:57.160]  error. They may not be allowed to set a cash bail like that to an out-of-state individual
[01:54:57.160 --> 01:55:00.500]  in Arizona, but you don't know whether that's true or not because you don't know what the
[01:55:00.500 --> 01:55:04.800]  rules of the game are. You haven't read them. Am I right?
[01:55:04.800 --> 01:55:08.360]  Right. So in truth, the only thing you can do about
[01:55:08.360 --> 01:55:14.480]  why did I get my money back is speculate because you have no way of knowing for sure. You hadn't
[01:55:14.480 --> 01:55:19.200]  even called the clerk to ask why, have you? No.
[01:55:19.200 --> 01:55:27.240]  Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner on the I ain't done shit for myself phase of this.
[01:55:27.240 --> 01:55:29.840]  See the problem? Yeah.
[01:55:29.840 --> 01:55:37.600]  I am not the freaking oracle, guys. I do what I can the best that I can, but that's all
[01:55:37.600 --> 01:55:43.440]  I got. So do some reading. Do some phone calls. Find
[01:55:43.440 --> 01:55:50.600]  something out. Write it all down. Put it in a pleading. Where is my true notice of what
[01:55:50.600 --> 01:55:56.400]  you're doing? And if they try to say the citation, say, hey, the citation is not signed. It's
[01:55:56.400 --> 01:56:00.280]  not sworn. It doesn't meet any of the criteria of a valid charging instrument in the state
[01:56:00.280 --> 01:56:05.280]  of Arizona. Blah, blah, blah, blah. But you better damn well know what statute says it
[01:56:05.280 --> 01:56:13.120]  has to. All right, thank you.
[01:56:13.120 --> 01:56:19.840]  There's your assignment for the week. All right. Thank you for calling.
[01:56:19.840 --> 01:56:24.840]  All right. Now we're going to go to Donna in Texas. Donna, what do you got?
[01:56:24.840 --> 01:56:30.320]  According to what you've just been saying of like with the last caller, there is a complaint.
[01:56:30.320 --> 01:56:36.680]  There is a citation. And within that complaint and citation, it says unlawfully operate motor
[01:56:36.680 --> 01:56:44.040]  vehicle. Blah, blah, blah. So am I to assume that I know I know you love the word assume
[01:56:44.040 --> 01:56:53.200]  the motion to dismiss is because I do not I was not unlawfully operating a motor vehicle.
[01:56:53.200 --> 01:56:59.600]  The motion to dismiss has nothing to do with the operation of a motor vehicle. It has to
[01:56:59.600 --> 01:57:06.520]  do with jurisdiction of the court. The difference there is that argument dealing with the motor
[01:57:06.520 --> 01:57:13.640]  vehicle is a merits argument. We have no basis for going to merits. Why? Because the code
[01:57:13.640 --> 01:57:22.800]  in which the alleged merits exist is itself entirely unconstitutional. If it is unconstitutional,
[01:57:22.800 --> 01:57:30.480]  it is not law. If it is not law, it creates no duty. If it creates no duty and makes no
[01:57:30.480 --> 01:57:37.120]  office, it does not grant a subject matter jurisdiction venue for a court. Therefore,
[01:57:37.120 --> 01:57:43.120]  it does not grant a personal jurisdiction venue for a court. Therefore, case dismissed
[01:57:43.120 --> 01:57:50.600]  for lack of jurisdiction. So the entire challenge is lack of jurisdiction on constitutional
[01:57:50.600 --> 01:57:58.560]  grounds. Okay. Are you still there? I'm here for a few more seconds, but a very few seconds.
[01:57:58.560 --> 01:58:03.840]  How do you do that? I don't know how to do it. Well, that's what the motion that you're
[01:58:03.840 --> 01:58:08.280]  waiting on me to get the documents for does for you, but you still need to read it and
[01:58:08.280 --> 01:58:15.720]  understand how it's doing it. I'm trying, Eddie. I really am. I know. And it's not easy,
[01:58:15.720 --> 01:58:19.640]  but that's why you need to be in the classes or pay into the screen so that you can at
[01:58:19.640 --> 01:58:25.080]  least listen. That's the whole point of it, to teach you how to use this stuff.
[01:58:25.080 --> 01:58:30.820]  Things are not good. But we're live streaming the class now, Donna, so you can watch it
[01:58:30.820 --> 01:58:37.360]  over the internet. Okay. All right. All right. I got to go. Thank you. When is the bill ready?
[01:58:37.360 --> 01:58:41.120]  I'm still waiting on documents. All right, folks. This has been the Monday Night Rule
[01:58:41.120 --> 01:58:45.880]  of Law Radio Show. Thanks for listening. Please keep me in your donations and your prayers
[01:58:45.880 --> 01:58:50.680]  for the upcoming case. Y'all have a great week. Good night. God bless you.
[01:58:50.680 --> 01:58:56.760]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.760 --> 01:59:02.200]  Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.200 --> 01:59:07.760]  what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of
[01:59:07.760 --> 01:59:14.760]  life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0107.
[01:59:14.760 --> 01:59:23.960]  Or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over
[01:59:23.960 --> 01:59:30.400]  13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.400 --> 01:59:34.960]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament
[01:59:34.960 --> 01:59:46.680]  Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at
[01:59:46.680 --> 02:00:07.000]  bfa.org. Looking for some truth? You found it. Logosradionetwork.com.