[00:00.000 --> 00:05.840]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:05.840 --> 00:08.360]  bulletins for the commodity market.
[00:08.360 --> 00:21.320]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.320 --> 00:27.360]  Markets for the 11th of December 2015, open up with gold at $1,070.62 an ounce, silver
[00:27.360 --> 00:34.120]  at $14.11 an ounce, Texas crude at $36.76 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting
[00:34.120 --> 00:42.760]  at about $420 U.S. currency.
[00:42.760 --> 00:48.120]  Today in history, Thursday, December 11th, 1913, the Mona Lisa stolen from the world's
[00:48.120 --> 00:53.760]  most visited museum, the iconic Louvre Museum in France, is finally recovered.
[00:53.760 --> 00:59.120]  It was snatched from the world's biggest museum just two years prior by Vincenzo Perugia
[00:59.120 --> 01:05.560]  on August 21st, 1911.
[01:05.560 --> 01:09.680]  In recent news, the use of big pharma and big agriculture is causing certain bacteria
[01:09.680 --> 01:14.680]  to develop resistance to the antibiotics being used on animals farmed for human consumption.
[01:14.680 --> 01:18.000]  This issue has spurred recommendations released in a report commissioned by British Prime
[01:18.000 --> 01:20.600]  Minister David Cameron earlier this week.
[01:20.600 --> 01:24.400]  Economist Jim O'Neill, who heads the commission, told the Guardian that, quote, it's time
[01:24.400 --> 01:26.160]  for policymakers to act on this.
[01:26.160 --> 01:30.020]  We need to radically reduce global use of antibiotics, and to do this, we need world
[01:30.020 --> 01:34.520]  leaders to agree on an ambitious target to lower levels, along with restricting the use
[01:34.520 --> 01:36.960]  of antibiotics important to humans.
[01:36.960 --> 01:41.200]  This creates a big resistance risk for everyone, which was highlighted by the recent Chinese
[01:41.200 --> 01:46.720]  finding of resistance to colostin, an important last resort antibiotic which has been used
[01:46.720 --> 01:48.040]  extensively in animal.
[01:48.040 --> 01:53.040]  The review on antimicrobial resistance estimates global antibiotic consumption in agriculture
[01:53.040 --> 01:59.280]  anywhere from 63,000 to 240,000 tons, with these figures predicted to rise at 67% from
[01:59.280 --> 02:05.000]  2010 to 2030 due to Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South African nations increasing
[02:05.000 --> 02:09.360]  their antibiotic use by as much as 99% in the next two decades as well.
[02:09.360 --> 02:13.560]  Critics of the proposal cite shortages or price hikes on antibiotics as a result of
[02:13.560 --> 02:23.600]  the restrictionist policies that would have to be enforced over production and distribution.
[02:23.600 --> 02:27.840]  French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius says that the COP21 climate talks he is co-hosting
[02:27.840 --> 02:33.600]  outside of Paris will not end today as scheduled, but will be extended at least until tomorrow.
[02:33.600 --> 02:37.560]  Diplomats and other top officials from more than 190 countries are agreeing on the final
[02:37.560 --> 02:41.320]  details of the global initiative to reduce man-made carbon emissions.
[02:41.320 --> 02:42.660]  There is still work to do.
[02:42.660 --> 02:44.680]  Things are going in the right direction, he said.
[02:44.680 --> 02:47.960]  Another crucial factor is China, the U.S., and other nations trying to figure out who
[02:47.960 --> 02:53.440]  is paying what for the multi-trillion dollar transition to clean energy on a global scale.
[02:53.440 --> 03:23.200]  This was your Lowdown for December 11, 2015.
[03:23.200 --> 03:36.800]  Thank you.
[03:53.200 --> 03:59.200]  A million streets, for all the people to see
[04:01.200 --> 04:04.200]  That justice is one thing you should always find
[04:04.200 --> 04:08.200]  You gotta settle up before you've got to draw a hard line
[04:08.200 --> 04:12.200]  When the gun's full settles, we'll sing a victory tune
[04:12.200 --> 04:16.200]  And we'll all meet back at the local salute
[04:16.200 --> 04:21.200]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing
[04:21.200 --> 04:26.200]  Let's get on my man, before my horse says
[04:28.200 --> 04:34.200]  Alright, folks, good evening. This is the Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:34.200 --> 04:41.200]  Alright, it is December 14, 2015. We continue to roll on.
[04:41.200 --> 04:46.200]  We are just a couple of weeks from the end of 2015, rolling into 2016.
[04:46.200 --> 04:53.200]  And as usual, the world around us may be waking up, but the evil around us is getting bigger.
[04:53.200 --> 05:01.200]  And even though we're awake, we're not doing enough to stir the pot to get rid of what's on top.
[05:01.200 --> 05:08.200]  We need to figure out what we're doing and where we're going and get there quick, or we're in trouble.
[05:08.200 --> 05:13.200]  Now, what I want to talk about tonight is proof positive of the kind of evidence
[05:13.200 --> 05:17.200]  that we should be able to recognize for the evil that it is
[05:17.200 --> 05:22.200]  and how it's been used to subjugate us within Texas and every other state.
[05:22.200 --> 05:25.200]  Don't get me wrong, it's everywhere.
[05:25.200 --> 05:33.200]  But again, as you all know, my specialty on dissecting this in detail is for Texas because this is where I live.
[05:33.200 --> 05:39.200]  If you want to know how it is in your state, get off of your lazy behind and research it.
[05:39.200 --> 05:44.200]  I can't be an expert in everything everywhere for everyone.
[05:44.200 --> 05:49.200]  It's time that you people got off your butts and did some work for yourselves wherever you're living.
[05:49.200 --> 05:54.200]  And for those that are in those places, you need to be getting together with more people like you,
[05:54.200 --> 05:57.200]  and you need to get a louder voice.
[05:57.200 --> 06:05.200]  Because right now, the system as it exists, exists for one purpose only,
[06:05.200 --> 06:11.200]  and that is not to protect you from harm and violence.
[06:11.200 --> 06:21.200]  It is to subject you to statist harm and violence in the name of transferring all the wealth you own
[06:21.200 --> 06:29.200]  into the hands of the few that control the system that make it possible.
[06:29.200 --> 06:39.200]  The more research you do, the more you're going to find out what lies at the bottom of all of this.
[06:39.200 --> 06:46.200]  And you can call it the Illuminati, you can call it the Masons, you can call it anything you want.
[06:46.200 --> 06:48.200]  But let me tell you where it all starts.
[06:48.200 --> 06:56.200]  And I guarantee you that you will find that the majority of the members of any of these organizations actually are.
[06:56.200 --> 06:58.200]  They're attorneys.
[06:58.200 --> 07:05.200]  I'm willing to bet you money that if you uncovered the occupation of the majority of the people
[07:05.200 --> 07:14.200]  that control these organizations and the system as a whole, you will find that it's attorneys.
[07:14.200 --> 07:18.200]  And Texas makes that extremely evident.
[07:18.200 --> 07:22.200]  The way you find out and prove it to yourself, for instance, is you go down
[07:22.200 --> 07:29.200]  and you get a list from the Secretary of State of all of the legislators in your state.
[07:29.200 --> 07:37.200]  And you want their contact information and their current occupation or past occupation,
[07:37.200 --> 07:46.200]  whatever it was, at the time they were serving as a representative or a senator.
[07:46.200 --> 07:55.200]  And you will find most likely that the majority of them are not your everyday folks, they are attorneys.
[07:55.200 --> 08:04.200]  Now here in Texas, the reason that's such a big deal is because the State Bar Act, as it was enacted in 1939,
[08:04.200 --> 08:11.200]  where 89% of one house was attorneys and 49% of the other house was attorneys.
[08:11.200 --> 08:19.200]  And they were required by the Constitution to not vote on any bill in which they had a direct personal
[08:19.200 --> 08:28.200]  or financial interest, which, of course, a private monopoly on the practice of law would absolutely be.
[08:28.200 --> 08:35.200]  And every one of them voted in favor of the State Bar Act in 1939.
[08:35.200 --> 08:42.200]  Then they codified the State Bar Act in the government code and stated that the State Bar Act
[08:42.200 --> 08:50.200]  and the State Bar itself, that the Act created, was created and organized
[08:50.200 --> 08:57.200]  as an administrative office of the Judicial Department of Government.
[08:57.200 --> 09:01.200]  Now y'all have heard me tell you this before.
[09:01.200 --> 09:09.200]  And because they are an administrative office of the Judicial Branch, anybody with a bar card is forbidden
[09:09.200 --> 09:19.200]  under Article 2 of our Texas Constitution, the Separation of Powers Clause, to serve in any other department of government.
[09:19.200 --> 09:26.200]  As long as they are actively carrying that bar card, doesn't matter whether they're using it or not.
[09:26.200 --> 09:31.200]  If they are dues-paying bar card members, they are judicial officers.
[09:31.200 --> 09:39.200]  As judicial officers, they are forbidden by Article 2 to do anything within any other department.
[09:39.200 --> 09:46.200]  They cannot be legislators. They cannot be governors. They cannot be our attorney general.
[09:46.200 --> 09:51.200]  They can't be any other office.
[09:51.200 --> 10:02.200]  Now this is where some questions can start to be raised beyond the constitutional violation of the Separation of Powers,
[10:02.200 --> 10:06.200]  but I'm going to give you a whole lot more to be raising this on.
[10:06.200 --> 10:20.200]  And one of the things we're going to come full circle to is how they classify the unauthorized practice of law in Texas.
[10:20.200 --> 10:30.200]  When you look up that statute in the penal code, the unauthorized practice of law is under the heading of obstructing governmental operation.
[10:30.200 --> 10:32.200]  Now you get that?
[10:32.200 --> 10:41.200]  The practice of law under the penal code is classified as a government function.
[10:41.200 --> 10:44.200]  Government.
[10:44.200 --> 11:03.200]  Now if the practice of law is actually a government function and all judicial bar card carrying attorneys are judicial officers under the judicial department of government,
[11:03.200 --> 11:07.200]  that would make sense, right?
[11:07.200 --> 11:25.200]  But it would also mean that every single attorney out there works for the very entity that is charging us with criminal activity and stealing our money in fines and fees.
[11:25.200 --> 11:41.200]  Which means you are not getting a fair and impartial trial because you are being tried and convicted by people that have a vested financial interest in the outcome of every single case,
[11:41.200 --> 11:48.200]  whether it be criminal or civil.
[11:48.200 --> 12:00.200]  And once again it is transferred into the hands of government, a monopoly power that the Texas Constitution absolutely forbids.
[12:00.200 --> 12:09.200]  There is no exception in the Texas Constitution for government to be the one in control of a monopoly.
[12:09.200 --> 12:10.200]  And let's look at it.
[12:10.200 --> 12:16.200]  Government has a control of the monopoly on gambling.
[12:16.200 --> 12:18.200]  They are the only ones that can host a lottery.
[12:18.200 --> 12:26.200]  They are the only ones that can authorize someone else to conduct any sort of gambling like a bingo parlor.
[12:26.200 --> 12:28.200]  Okay?
[12:28.200 --> 12:35.200]  Government has a monopoly on tobacco, alcohol, and everything else sold here in Texas.
[12:35.200 --> 12:38.200]  And the production of same.
[12:38.200 --> 12:44.200]  You can't produce it and sell it without their consent and permission.
[12:44.200 --> 12:48.200]  Now we've got one on the practice of law.
[12:48.200 --> 12:53.200]  But here's where it can get more interesting.
[12:53.200 --> 13:02.200]  If every attorney is in fact a government official when acting as an attorney, which under the law that's all they can be,
[13:02.200 --> 13:09.200]  they cannot be acting privately if they're acting under that bar card because that bar card makes them a judicial officer.
[13:09.200 --> 13:18.200]  And the functions associated with that bar card by law are ones of a governmental function.
[13:18.200 --> 13:35.200]  So how then is an attorney authorized to charge the public fees for his services that he gets to put in his own pocket when his entire function is one of government?
[13:35.200 --> 13:44.200]  In any other business that would be called embezzlement.
[13:44.200 --> 13:47.200]  You want to know why the monopoly is protected?
[13:47.200 --> 14:02.200]  Well, let's go through that and we'll show you why that monopoly and the other monopolies are protected and why attorneys can use the law to steal from you and me.
[14:02.200 --> 14:10.200]  Now as I started out with, they're already in violation of the separation of powers by occupying the other houses of government.
[14:10.200 --> 14:14.200]  Not only are they in the judicial and control that, they are in the legislature.
[14:14.200 --> 14:26.200]  And I guarantee you if you go get a headcount, you're going to find that they are a huge percentage of each house, almost guaranteed.
[14:26.200 --> 14:29.200]  Then find out how many of them are operating in the executive.
[14:29.200 --> 14:31.200]  Your governor is an attorney right now.
[14:31.200 --> 14:33.200]  Your prior governor was an attorney.
[14:33.200 --> 14:34.200]  Your AG is an attorney.
[14:34.200 --> 14:38.200]  Your prior AG was an attorney before he became governor right now.
[14:38.200 --> 14:42.200]  So they control the executive functions as well.
[14:42.200 --> 14:55.200]  So every department of Texas government is infested like a cockroach-ridden house with attorneys.
[14:55.200 --> 15:11.200]  Attorneys are sitting in the legislature creating laws that keep them in power and makes what they're doing legal even though it is unconstitutional.
[15:11.200 --> 15:13.200]  Now figure that one out.
[15:13.200 --> 15:16.200]  They say it's legal because who makes that determination?
[15:16.200 --> 15:21.200]  The courts do, where the attorneys live and what the attorneys control.
[15:21.200 --> 15:32.200]  The attorneys write the law that the court gets to interpret to say that it's all okay, but nobody bothers to compare it to the Texas Constitution.
[15:32.200 --> 15:36.200]  And a few times, let's take for instance the subject of property tax.
[15:36.200 --> 15:40.200]  Let's go over something about property tax here real quick.
[15:40.200 --> 15:48.200]  The Texas Constitution prior to recent amendments absolutely forbade the state to have an ad valorem property tax.
[15:48.200 --> 15:56.200]  And any taxes levied by the state, property tax or otherwise, were required to be uniform.
[15:56.200 --> 16:08.200]  Now if you want to know if that's true, go look at the Texas Constitution, Article 8, Section 1, okay, and Article 7, Section 3, and so on and so forth.
[16:08.200 --> 16:15.200]  But you will find that all taxes were required to be uniform and that ad valorem property taxes were forbidden.
[16:15.200 --> 16:28.200]  But when you bring this subject up to one of them, what they say is that the legislature can authorize municipalities and counties to levy ad valorem taxes.
[16:28.200 --> 16:35.200]  But let's, on the other side, consider how that could be possible.
[16:35.200 --> 16:41.200]  I mean, the Texas Constitution forbids the state to have such a power.
[16:41.200 --> 16:51.200]  So how in the hell did they delegate it to a municipality or a county to use, or a school district for that matter?
[16:51.200 --> 17:00.200]  All right, folks, y'all hang in there. This is Rule of Law Radio. We'll be right back.
[17:00.200 --> 17:06.200]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.200 --> 17:11.200]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.200 --> 17:17.200]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.200 --> 17:25.200]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.200 --> 17:31.200]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:31.200 --> 17:39.200]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.200 --> 17:47.200]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:47.200 --> 17:51.200]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.200 --> 18:00.200]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[18:00.200 --> 18:05.200]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.200 --> 18:09.200]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:09.200 --> 18:15.200]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:15.200 --> 18:21.200]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.200 --> 18:27.200]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.200 --> 18:34.200]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.200 --> 18:39.200]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.200 --> 18:41.200]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.200 --> 18:50.200]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[18:50.200 --> 19:00.200]  RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-f at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.200 --> 19:22.200]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:22.200 --> 19:32.200]  The Logos Radio Network, the Logos RadioNetwork.com.
[19:52.200 --> 20:02.200]  All right, folks, we are back.
[20:02.200 --> 20:05.200]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig.
[20:05.200 --> 20:09.200]  All right, let's go on with this and see what we can find.
[20:09.200 --> 20:17.200]  Now remember, as I said going out, that every time you breach this subject with anyone in the legislature,
[20:17.200 --> 20:29.200]  they say that the legislature has the power to authorize school boards, municipalities, and counties to levy this tax on your property, the ad valorem property tax.
[20:29.200 --> 20:34.200]  Well, an ad valorem tax is not uniform, not anywhere.
[20:34.200 --> 20:46.200]  And the thing about a uniform tax is you don't get to say, okay, over here we charge 10% or your property is worth 10,000, so you've got to pay 10% of that.
[20:46.200 --> 20:51.200]  And over here, your property is worth 50,000, and you've got to pay 10% of that.
[20:51.200 --> 20:56.200]  Because one guy is still paying 1,000, the other guy is still paying 5,000.
[20:56.200 --> 21:01.200]  There is nothing uniform about that, nothing.
[21:01.200 --> 21:07.200]  It's still a buy value tax, and it's unconstitutional.
[21:07.200 --> 21:17.200]  The Texas Supreme Court ruled 10 years ago that the method they were using to get property taxes was absolutely unconstitutional.
[21:17.200 --> 21:21.200]  And everything they've done regarding property taxes is unconstitutional.
[21:21.200 --> 21:24.200]  Why? Well, let's think about this.
[21:24.200 --> 21:35.200]  Article 1, Section 29 of the Texas Constitution states very clearly that nothing in the Constitution can be violated by a state law.
[21:35.200 --> 21:39.200]  And nothing in the Constitution can be violated by a court opinion.
[21:39.200 --> 21:45.200]  And nothing in the Constitution can be violated by any executive action or function.
[21:45.200 --> 21:49.200]  And it doesn't limit it to this branch of government.
[21:49.200 --> 21:53.200]  Article 1, Section 29 says government.
[21:53.200 --> 22:01.200]  All the things in the Bill of Rights and all the things in the Constitution are all forever removed from the powers of government.
[22:01.200 --> 22:09.200]  The Bill of Rights is removed from the powers of government, meaning they cannot create legislation related to the Bill of Rights.
[22:09.200 --> 22:13.200]  None!
[22:13.200 --> 22:18.200]  That's just common sense application of the language.
[22:18.200 --> 22:24.200]  You cannot amend the Bill of Rights through statutory means.
[22:24.200 --> 22:35.200]  You cannot create a constitutional amendment at the legislative level to alter the Bill of Rights.
[22:35.200 --> 22:53.200]  You cannot use a court opinion to alter the Bill of Rights, which makes Ex Parte Greenwood and oh so many other cases in Texas that say they can get by on a complaint alone in these lower courts, but not in the courts above them, mind you.
[22:53.200 --> 23:04.200]  They've created an unequal protection of the law and an unequal application of the constitutional protections in the Bill of Rights.
[23:04.200 --> 23:10.200]  These people get legal representation when they're charged with a crime.
[23:10.200 --> 23:12.200]  These people don't.
[23:12.200 --> 23:15.200]  There's no authority in the Texas Constitution for that.
[23:15.200 --> 23:19.200]  The only place that authority exists right now is in case law.
[23:19.200 --> 23:20.200]  And who created that?
[23:20.200 --> 23:27.200]  Attorneys sitting as judges.
[23:27.200 --> 23:43.200]  And then who creates law that prevents us from exercising our right to sue our representatives and our local government public servants for violation of the Constitution and the law?
[23:43.200 --> 23:53.200]  A legislature full of attorneys.
[23:53.200 --> 24:08.200]  And then who of course controls the armed goon squads we call the police agencies and the sheriff's departments and the Texas Department of Public Safety and the Texas Rangers and the Texas National Guard?
[24:08.200 --> 24:20.200]  To be used against the people of Texas who understand the Constitution forbids the very things they're watching happen and are willing to do what's necessary to fix it.
[24:20.200 --> 24:27.200]  You become a criminal because you believe in supporting your Constitution and protecting your rights in your state.
[24:27.200 --> 24:35.200]  The attorneys have used the legislature to make each and every one of us that would do so a criminal.
[24:35.200 --> 24:45.200]  Even though that is our inherent right protected by the Bill of Rights in the same Constitution, they're saying we have no power to enforce.
[24:45.200 --> 24:59.200]  The same Constitution that says all of their power comes from us, they are now creating laws to take all that power away from us to transfer it to them.
[24:59.200 --> 25:02.200]  Attorneys.
[25:02.200 --> 25:19.200]  When you go read the State Bar Act relating to attorneys and then you read the structure of how attorneys are licensed by the Texas Supreme Court and how the statutes are written to say that an attorney can do everything short of murder
[25:19.200 --> 25:31.200]  and his bar card will still be protected and all of the forces of the state will come together to ensure it's protected.
[25:31.200 --> 25:49.200]  That right there folks is proof positive that the attorneys are voting into law, those laws that serve them and their transfer of your property and wealth into their possession by any and all means, moral, immoral, constitutional, unconstitutional, legal or illegal.
[25:49.200 --> 25:53.200]  And of course, if it's illegal, they make it legal so they can do it.
[25:53.200 --> 26:08.200]  And then they call out the executive functionaries where they're also in control and order them to enforce it at the barrel of a gun to allow them to steal what is rightfully ours.
[26:08.200 --> 26:18.200]  Newsflash folks, if you're still voting for an incumbent member of a political body,
[26:18.200 --> 26:26.200]  you're not thinking. If you think voting is helping the way things are going, you're still not thinking.
[26:26.200 --> 26:45.200]  Because as long as they can control the votes through their electronic voting machines, which no one's up in arms about, even though there is proof positive that voter fraud has been rampant in voter elections since the day they were put in,
[26:45.200 --> 26:54.200]  I mean, it is ridiculous that you're still sitting out there and looking the other way.
[26:54.200 --> 26:58.200]  It really is.
[26:58.200 --> 27:06.200]  What we need is a whole new everything.
[27:06.200 --> 27:09.200]  We need to hit the reset button.
[27:09.200 --> 27:28.200]  We need to take all power and authority away from every attorney. We need to add a constitutional amendment forbidding any attorney to ever hold any public office, just like the federal Constitution had in it before that was illegally removed.
[27:28.200 --> 27:39.200]  And absolutely forbid them to ever hold a public office. We need a constitutional amendment to create a new dedicated grand jury.
[27:39.200 --> 27:56.200]  We have one grand jury that looks into all the criminal cases and all that, and then we have a grand jury whose sole job is to investigate and hand down indictments in public corruption cases.
[27:56.200 --> 28:09.200]  A grand jury whose only job is to take complaints against public servants and investigate them for criminality and indict them if they find it.
[28:09.200 --> 28:29.200]  And on the criminal side, we need a constitutional amendment where the grand jury there may not take any information from a prosecutor without also taking information from the accused or their legal counsel.
[28:29.200 --> 28:39.200]  This one-sided baloney of getting an indictment, as the old saying goes, a good prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich.
[28:39.200 --> 28:50.200]  Well, the problem there is it's real easy for a prosecutor to misconstrue the facts to a grand jury to get an indictment and tarnish someone's life forever.
[28:50.200 --> 29:08.200]  Even though he fails to prosecute the case, even though he has no evidence to prosecute the case, once that indictment is on the table, they can compel a plea bargain on the possibility that they might get a conviction by accident.
[29:08.200 --> 29:17.200]  That needs to stop. And plea bargains need to stop.
[29:17.200 --> 29:23.200]  If they can actually prove you committed the crime, you do the time.
[29:23.200 --> 29:32.200]  No more of these mal and prohibitum BSs. If they can't produce an injured party other than one of themselves in a fictional sense, there is no crime.
[29:32.200 --> 29:34.200]  There is no case.
[29:34.200 --> 29:48.200]  We need to change the Texas Constitution back to something much clearer, much simpler, and we need to forbid the legislature from ever being the impetus that creates a legislative amendment.
[29:48.200 --> 29:53.200]  All amendments have to be brought forth by the people and go through the people.
[29:53.200 --> 30:02.200]  All right, folks, y'all hang on and we'll continue this on the other side.
[30:02.200 --> 30:05.200]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[30:05.200 --> 30:10.200]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it.
[30:10.200 --> 30:17.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[30:17.200 --> 30:22.200]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.200 --> 30:27.200]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.200 --> 30:32.200]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.200 --> 30:35.200]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.200 --> 30:42.200]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.200 --> 30:46.200]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.200 --> 30:51.200]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[30:51.200 --> 31:00.200]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[31:00.200 --> 31:06.200]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding fathers.
[31:06.200 --> 31:09.200]  Third party, Third Amendment? Get it?
[31:09.200 --> 31:17.200]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[31:17.200 --> 31:22.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:47.200 --> 31:52.200]  If you feel better than ever, it alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of tin products.
[31:52.200 --> 32:02.200]  That saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367 only at musa.org.
[32:02.200 --> 32:05.200]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.200 --> 32:12.200]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.200 --> 32:19.200]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.200 --> 32:25.200]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.200 --> 32:35.200]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.200 --> 32:40.200]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.200 --> 32:50.200]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.200 --> 32:54.200]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.200 --> 33:11.200]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:11.200 --> 33:27.200]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I'm gonna solve them, to the government them, prosecute them. Okay.
[33:27.200 --> 33:52.200]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:52.200 --> 33:57.200]  We are talking about these attorneys and why they're a problem.
[33:57.200 --> 34:00.200]  So let's continue on.
[34:00.200 --> 34:20.200]  Like I said, they've created laws to protect themselves from the repercussions of their actions while endangering us by their very existence and also violating the Bill of Rights and other provisions of the Texas Constitution through the creation of these laws.
[34:20.200 --> 34:33.200]  For some reason, at the federal level, the courts agree that the Congress was given a limited set of powers, and there were 18 of them.
[34:33.200 --> 34:47.200]  But somehow or other, they concluded that a state constitution was not a limit on what the state legislature could do.
[34:47.200 --> 34:56.200]  In fact, just because what you failed to not give them, they automatically have, is the logic applied to the Constitution.
[34:56.200 --> 35:06.200]  When you say, okay, the state shall be able to do this, they took that as meaning at anything else that you didn't forbid.
[35:06.200 --> 35:20.200]  And that's completely idiotic. But then again, attorneys are in control of that, so that also is a reasonable summation that it's idiotic.
[35:20.200 --> 35:40.200]  I've never met anyone more egotistical, self-centered, self-important, and considering themselves to be intellectually superior to everyone they meet than an attorney.
[35:40.200 --> 35:53.200]  Now, granted, not all of them are always exactly that way, but the ones that I have seen it come from on things that would blow a regular scale right out of the water have been attorneys.
[35:53.200 --> 35:57.200]  They are the most arrogant bunch that I've ever met.
[35:57.200 --> 36:17.200]  In fact, if you read anything written by Antonia Scalia of the United States Supreme Court, you will find that he cannot stop referring to how intelligent his breed is over the rest of us.
[36:17.200 --> 36:28.200]  In fact, in his book, one of the things he's, in this book I'm reading, Make Your Case, How to Convince a Judge, the thing he states in there, he says,
[36:28.200 --> 36:42.200]  whenever you're going into court to present your case, talk to the judge like you would talk to a senior partner at your law firm, a highly intelligent, perhaps more intelligent senior partner.
[36:42.200 --> 36:48.200]  Newsflash, I've read the Constitution, state and federal.
[36:48.200 --> 36:59.200]  I've read your opinions on many, many, many, many cases, not only Scalia, but all the rest of you scumbags sitting up there.
[36:59.200 --> 37:05.200]  And intelligent is nothing I would ever have accused any of you of.
[37:05.200 --> 37:21.200]  Because you decide on how it suits you, not because you're intelligent, but because of the transfer of power it gives you or those that keep you in power in that court.
[37:21.200 --> 37:36.200]  You have gutted the Bill of Rights, which if you were intelligent, you would not have done because an intelligent person would understand that they are outnumbered 10,000 to one
[37:36.200 --> 37:44.200]  when the crap hits the fan because of the crap you're creating that will eventually catch up with you.
[37:44.200 --> 37:48.200]  An intelligent person wouldn't be that stupid.
[37:48.200 --> 38:17.200]  An intelligent person would not assume that simply because they're in control of the United States military that they could subjugate the entire nation through the use of force of that military in order to quash any uprising brought forth by the crap that you've pulled in the positions that you have.
[38:17.200 --> 38:28.200]  An intelligent person would understand that there's always a way and that even with the American military, we still outnumber them considerably.
[38:28.200 --> 38:47.200]  And just like how we taught the French to do guerrilla warfare against the Germans and add power to their own internal rebellion, we will be able to expect the same thing to occur here.
[38:47.200 --> 38:52.200]  Because what you haven't done successfully is to take away our guns.
[38:52.200 --> 38:55.200]  The Nazis did that to the French.
[38:55.200 --> 39:16.200]  In fact, we had to manufacture and fly in small single-shot revolvers by the plane loads and parachute them into France so that the people in the resistance could take these and use that one small single-shot gun to ambush Nazi soldiers and capture their weapons.
[39:16.200 --> 39:36.200]  And as you captured more weapons, you were able to capture increasingly bigger, more powerful weapons. And you were able to start functioning in groups instead of as one or two persons that had to ambush a single soldier, et cetera, et cetera.
[39:36.200 --> 39:43.200]  America taught this type of warfare to other countries when they needed it.
[39:43.200 --> 40:00.200]  And there are a lot of us, ex-veterans, those of us that served in the military, those that haven't but have spent an awful lot of time learning how to do this stuff, living out off the land in the wilderness, becoming self-sufficient, knowledgeable in how things work.
[40:00.200 --> 40:07.200]  You think those people are just going to roll over and let this go forever.
[40:07.200 --> 40:12.200]  An intelligent person wouldn't think that.
[40:12.200 --> 40:17.200]  An intelligent person would learn from their mistakes.
[40:17.200 --> 40:20.200]  You people don't learn from your mistakes.
[40:20.200 --> 40:23.200]  You just create more of them.
[40:23.200 --> 40:29.200]  And you use increasingly flawed logic to do so.
[40:29.200 --> 40:42.200]  I mean, just as an example, you have the gay marriage issue, and like I said, I am in no way taking sides on this issue whatsoever.
[40:42.200 --> 40:52.200]  I am simply using this as an example of the kind of people we're talking about here that consider themselves so highly freaking intelligent.
[40:52.200 --> 41:03.200]  Several years ago, you had a court decision by the United States Supreme Court, the same five justices on that court said that marriage is a state issue.
[41:03.200 --> 41:15.200]  It has no business in the federal arena, and the federal government has no business mucking around in it, and they were not going to create a precedent for them to do so.
[41:15.200 --> 41:20.200]  And then the gay marriage issue arises.
[41:20.200 --> 41:36.200]  And the same five justices have now made it where the majority of the Supreme Court is now the decider of what marriage is and isn't.
[41:36.200 --> 41:54.200]  And I'll give Scalia credit on that case. That's his one really good dissent that I'm going to go with, not because of the subject matter of the case, but because of the principle of judicial activism that he puts on the table to try to chop its head off.
[41:54.200 --> 42:10.200]  And that is, is that now the decisions on marriage in the entire bit of America, in every state of the union, is now under the supreme control of a majority vote of the Supreme Court.
[42:10.200 --> 42:19.200]  They now make all the decisions on what marriage is and isn't. That's what that opinion amounted to.
[42:19.200 --> 42:31.200]  They completely flip-flopped on their previous opinion, saying that this is none of our business. We have no authority here. It's not one of our enumerated powers.
[42:31.200 --> 42:42.200]  Okay? So these are not people nearly as highly intelligent as they would like you to believe they are.
[42:42.200 --> 42:52.200]  And the problem is, is they're fricking mentally unstable. Proof of that is the fact that they will change their position from case to case if it suits them.
[42:52.200 --> 43:07.200]  And they will split hairs so fine that no reasonable person could know when they've moved from one splice of it to the other with any actual knowledge of having done so.
[43:07.200 --> 43:20.200]  They've created for the first time in history through their latest opinions a fundamental mistake of law is forgivable as long as you work for the government.
[43:20.200 --> 43:25.200]  You're not required to know the law in order to enforce the law.
[43:25.200 --> 43:38.200]  You're not required to know if you are properly applying the law before you disrupt someone's life and subject them to all of the power of the state in a prosecutorial fashion.
[43:38.200 --> 43:49.200]  That was a recent case of Rodriguez. Okay? Stopped for the one tail light out in a state that only required one tail light.
[43:49.200 --> 44:00.200]  All right, folks. Y'all hang on. We'll pick this up when we get back. We'll be right back. Hold on.
[44:00.200 --> 44:07.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary.
[44:07.200 --> 44:15.200]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:15.200 --> 44:22.200]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.200 --> 44:27.200]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[44:27.200 --> 44:34.200]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:34.200 --> 44:43.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.200 --> 44:52.200]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.200 --> 45:03.200]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.200 --> 45:07.200]  Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com.
[45:07.200 --> 45:13.200]  And I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas.
[45:13.200 --> 45:19.200]  I'm Brave New Books and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.200 --> 45:23.200]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.200 --> 45:31.200]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.200 --> 45:38.200]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.200 --> 45:44.200]  That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.200 --> 45:48.200]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.200 --> 46:14.200]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.200 --> 46:25.200]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:25.200 --> 46:28.200]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:28.200 --> 46:30.200]  All right.
[46:30.200 --> 46:34.200]  Now, as long as we're allowing stuff like this to continue,
[46:34.200 --> 46:44.200]  we're these judges through the courts and these attorneys that, you know, cut all these deals without any thought of due process,
[46:44.200 --> 46:48.200]  without any thought of the rights of the individual.
[46:48.200 --> 46:50.200]  I mean, this has got to stop.
[46:50.200 --> 46:59.200]  This allowing attorneys to control every aspect of our government has got to stop.
[46:59.200 --> 47:11.200]  There are so many things that I have found in my years of research in all these subjects that prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt,
[47:11.200 --> 47:13.200]  the system is irreparably broken.
[47:13.200 --> 47:17.200]  You cannot fix it, okay?
[47:17.200 --> 47:25.200]  You may as well take an erector set that's been thrown through a wood chipper
[47:25.200 --> 47:32.200]  and try to make the same thing out of it that you would when it was first bought in the box.
[47:32.200 --> 47:37.200]  It will never be able to be done.
[47:37.200 --> 47:42.200]  And it's time to discard it.
[47:42.200 --> 47:49.200]  It's time to remove those that control it from their ability to control anything
[47:49.200 --> 47:59.200]  because they have proven time and time again they cannot be trusted with that power and that responsibility.
[47:59.200 --> 48:05.200]  When a particular clique of individuals or a class of individuals, if you prefer,
[48:05.200 --> 48:17.200]  that organize a single type of occupation to such an extent that it can consume every bit of political power
[48:17.200 --> 48:32.200]  and motivation so as to be the sole monopolistic control over every aspect of what happens.
[48:32.200 --> 48:40.200]  How could you see it as being anything other than a nightmare?
[48:40.200 --> 48:49.200]  How could you see them doing anything other than making a completely self-serving system?
[48:49.200 --> 48:51.200]  And that's what they've done.
[48:51.200 --> 48:53.200]  Everything about this system is self-serving.
[48:53.200 --> 48:57.200]  You cannot get legal assistance without mortgaging your house.
[48:57.200 --> 49:00.200]  If you fail to pay in any way, they take your house.
[49:00.200 --> 49:05.200]  He's got you not only whatever money you pay, but now he's got your property too.
[49:05.200 --> 49:12.200]  And then he'll turn around and become a slumlord with it, rent it out for way more than it actually should be getting,
[49:12.200 --> 49:17.200]  and fail to fix anything on it and take care of it as long as he's getting his money.
[49:17.200 --> 49:20.200]  It's typical.
[49:20.200 --> 49:26.200]  And then they create laws to make it where it's legal for them to get away with doing these things.
[49:26.200 --> 49:29.200]  Like I said, you go read the government code.
[49:29.200 --> 49:35.200]  An attorney's license is to be protected at all costs.
[49:35.200 --> 49:42.200]  He has to do the worst things you can imagine to even be considered to lose that bar card.
[49:42.200 --> 49:49.200]  But let me tell you what the worst thing in their system is, and it isn't what you would imagine.
[49:49.200 --> 49:51.200]  They can commit murder.
[49:51.200 --> 49:53.200]  They can commit fraud.
[49:53.200 --> 49:57.200]  They can burglarize houses.
[49:57.200 --> 50:06.200]  And the law still requires that all effort be put into protecting their bar card.
[50:06.200 --> 50:15.200]  But you let that attorney stand up and point a finger at the wrongs in the system under which that power lives,
[50:15.200 --> 50:20.200]  and he will be excommunicated.
[50:20.200 --> 50:27.200]  He won't just be disbarred, he will be excommunicated from the brethren of the bar association.
[50:27.200 --> 50:35.200]  He will become a literal leper, the untreatable kind of leper,
[50:35.200 --> 50:42.200]  which will leave him having to get an ordinary job at ordinary wages because he can't legally steal anymore,
[50:42.200 --> 50:48.200]  at least not in the quantities that he was able to steal as one of them.
[50:48.200 --> 50:51.200]  And now you want to know why most of them won't blow the whistle?
[50:51.200 --> 50:57.200]  It's the exact opposite of all these other industries where we're screaming for people to blow the whistle.
[50:57.200 --> 51:01.200]  Why aren't there any good cops going after the bad cops and blah, blah, blah?
[51:01.200 --> 51:06.200]  Well, for exactly the same reason, there are no good attorneys going after bad attorneys
[51:06.200 --> 51:13.200]  because they don't get to stay what they are for long if they do.
[51:13.200 --> 51:18.200]  They're history.
[51:18.200 --> 51:26.200]  So the system is irreparably broken.
[51:26.200 --> 51:37.200]  There should be no government power that is allowed to be directed at the people or their property in any form or fashion
[51:37.200 --> 51:46.200]  except for the one single purpose for which government was formed and societies were established in the first place,
[51:46.200 --> 51:53.200]  protection of individual rights from intrusion by another,
[51:53.200 --> 52:01.200]  regardless of who that other may be, an individual, a group, or government.
[52:01.200 --> 52:06.200]  Our constitutions in every state should state that plain and simple.
[52:06.200 --> 52:17.200]  Government shall make no law relating to the person, property, or effects of any of the people in any of their activities, you name it,
[52:17.200 --> 52:35.200]  with the only provisio being except in the case of injury to another person or their property without that individual's knowledge and consent.
[52:35.200 --> 52:37.200]  That simple.
[52:37.200 --> 52:43.200]  Government shall make no law.
[52:43.200 --> 52:52.200]  Now, you can let them do whatever they want to a corporation as long as they keep that corporation within its confines.
[52:52.200 --> 53:02.200]  But corporations shall never be treated as persons, and corporations in Texas shall never be allowed to invest money in political elections.
[53:02.200 --> 53:12.200]  And if they do, once again, here's my suggestion on taking control of how money affects the outcome of elections.
[53:12.200 --> 53:17.200]  Now, several people have always said, I don't want my money being used for something I don't support.
[53:17.200 --> 53:29.200]  Newsflash people, your money is already being used for something that you didn't agree to or want to support every single day.
[53:29.200 --> 53:41.200]  If it's taken from you in taxes or you gave it as a donation to a candidate, none of them kept their promises about what they were going to do once they got into office, did they?
[53:41.200 --> 53:53.200]  So your money paid for them to get there to break those promises, and then your tax money is used in ways that you didn't approve of and never wanted it used for, but there it is.
[53:53.200 --> 54:03.200]  So you're belly-aching about my plan, it didn't fix anything, but the plan itself would.
[54:03.200 --> 54:21.200]  Any money donated for the purpose of subsidizing a political candidate of any kind in any race, all money, every dime goes into one pool, one single pool of money.
[54:21.200 --> 54:31.200]  That money will be equally divided among all candidates running for that office, okay?
[54:31.200 --> 54:42.200]  They must account to the penny for every penny that they were allotted and spent.
[54:42.200 --> 54:59.200]  If they have money and expenses that were not paid for out of that fund, they are disqualified and they go to jail, because that means they took outside money to augment that money, which will be forbidden.
[54:59.200 --> 55:08.200]  So they must provide receipts and proof of everything they used that money for during the course of that election.
[55:08.200 --> 55:13.200]  We set it up where everyone gets the same amount of air and radio time.
[55:13.200 --> 55:24.200]  All the stations, since they're incorporated entities, they have to provide air time to these people to play their stuff, and everyone has one minute.
[55:24.200 --> 55:29.200]  You make this commercial and you've got one minute to tell us why you should be elected.
[55:29.200 --> 55:36.200]  You want to use it to attack your opponent? Whatever, but you got one minute.
[55:36.200 --> 55:42.200]  Okay? And you get three ads, no more than three.
[55:42.200 --> 55:50.200]  Out of that, that money and once it's equally divided, they all start off on even footing.
[55:50.200 --> 55:54.200]  No single candidate has an advantage over another one.
[55:54.200 --> 56:03.200]  No single candidate or group of candidates goes into an election owing anybody any political favors.
[56:03.200 --> 56:15.200]  Everyone starts and remains equal, both funding-wise and liability and responsibility-wise.
[56:15.200 --> 56:31.200]  And under no circumstances is any political candidate authorized or allowed to make any promises that they cannot show a constitutional authority for them to make.
[56:31.200 --> 56:42.200]  If they say they're going to do this, they better be able to produce a constitutional section that says that office that you're going for has the power to do this.
[56:42.200 --> 56:51.200]  And if it doesn't, then you've made a false promise, you will be deemed dishonest, and you are disqualified from the race.
[56:51.200 --> 57:00.200]  And you have to pay back every penny you used thus far.
[57:00.200 --> 57:10.200]  Now tell me, if you can, what is so bad about that system, since your money's already being used for stuff you don't like,
[57:10.200 --> 57:19.200]  if it's evenly divided up to ensure that all our candidates have to follow the same rules and start out from the same perspective and point,
[57:19.200 --> 57:29.200]  why would you rather withhold your money for that than to give it to somebody who doesn't keep the promises they were making when you gave it to them?
[57:29.200 --> 57:34.200]  I don't understand that self-limiting thing.
[57:34.200 --> 57:42.200]  And at the same time, you make a constitutional provision that while this race is going on, every ballot must be done on paper.
[57:42.200 --> 57:49.200]  It must be filled out, and it must be filed, or you don't have to fill it out, but it has to be counted in public view.
[57:49.200 --> 57:59.200]  It has to be put into a single, clear, open box right out in the middle of the voting area, okay?
[57:59.200 --> 58:06.200]  And that's where it gets counted. It doesn't leave the view of the public, ever.
[58:06.200 --> 58:12.200]  If we don't start doing things like this, people, our country's gone.
[58:12.200 --> 58:25.200]  It'll all be in the pockets of someone that is not deserving of it and used legalities that they created for themselves to steal it.
[58:25.200 --> 58:34.200]  So you better get your heads out, you better quit walking on hopes alone and get motivated, because if we don't do something, we are sunk.
[58:34.200 --> 58:39.200]  All right, folks, we are at the top of the hour break. I want to turn the phones on so y'all can start calling in.
[58:39.200 --> 58:50.200]  Call in number 512-646-1984. Get in line, give us some questions. We'll be right back.
[58:50.200 --> 58:58.200]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.200 --> 59:06.200]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.200 --> 59:18.200]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.200 --> 59:28.200]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.200 --> 59:33.200]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.200 --> 59:47.200]  This comprehensive yet compact Study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.200 --> 59:50.200]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.200 --> 01:00:00.200]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.200 --> 01:00:20.200]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:20.200 --> 01:00:42.200]  Markets for the 11th of December 2015 open up with gold at $1,070.62 an ounce, silver $14.11 an ounce, Texas crude $36.76 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $420 U.S. currency.
[01:00:42.200 --> 01:00:53.200]  Today in history, Thursday, December 11, 1913, the Mona Lisa stolen from the world's most visited museum, the iconic Louvre Museum in France, is finally recovered.
[01:00:53.200 --> 01:01:05.200]  It was snatched from the world's biggest museum just two years prior by Vincenzo Perugia on August 21, 1911.
[01:01:05.200 --> 01:01:14.200]  In recent news, the use of big pharma and big agriculture is causing certain bacteria to develop resistance to the antibiotics being used on animals farmed for human consumption.
[01:01:14.200 --> 01:01:20.200]  This issue has spurred recommendations released in a report commissioned by British Prime Minister David Cameron earlier this week.
[01:01:20.200 --> 01:01:36.200]  Economist Jim O'Neill, who heads the commission, told The Guardian that, quote, it's time for policymakers to act on this. We need to radically reduce global use of antibiotics, and to do this, we need world leaders to agree on an ambitious target to lower levels, along with restricting the use of antibiotics important to humans.
[01:01:36.200 --> 01:01:48.200]  This creates a big resistance risk for everyone, which was highlighted by the recent Chinese finding of resistance to colostin, an important last resort antibiotic which has been used extensively in animal.
[01:01:48.200 --> 01:02:09.200]  A review on antimicrobial resistance estimates global antibiotic consumption in agriculture anywhere from 63,000 to 240,000 tons, with these figures predicted to rise 67% from 2010 to 2030 due to Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South African nations increasing their antibiotic use by as much as 99% in the next two decades as well.
[01:02:09.200 --> 01:02:23.200]  Critics of the proposal cite shortages or price hikes on antibiotics as a result of the restrictionist policies that would have to be enforced over production and distribution.
[01:02:23.200 --> 01:02:41.200]  French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius says that the COP21 climate talks he is co-hosting outside of Paris will not end today as scheduled, but will be extended at least until tomorrow. Diplomats and other top officials from more than 190 countries are agreeing on the final details of the global initiative to reduce man-made carbon emissions.
[01:02:41.200 --> 01:02:55.200]  There is still work to do. Things are going in the right direction, he said. Another crucial factor is China, the US, and other nations trying to figure out who's paying what for the multi-trillion dollar transition to clean energy on a global scale.
[01:02:55.200 --> 01:03:05.200]  This is your Lowdown for December 11, 2015.
[01:03:05.200 --> 01:03:12.200]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty.
[01:03:12.200 --> 01:03:19.200]  I read his book and it says the cares gone for the unsightly.
[01:03:19.200 --> 01:03:28.200]  These warmongers come by that term rightly.
[01:03:28.200 --> 01:03:38.200]  I won't pay for the war with my body. Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money. I won't pay for the fun with my body.
[01:03:38.200 --> 01:03:45.200]  The French wicked and the logic shoddy. Ain't gonna pay for the oil with my body.
[01:03:45.200 --> 01:03:54.200]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:54.200 --> 01:04:04.200]  Alright, let's see, we have Jose in New York. Jose, what can we do for you?
[01:04:04.200 --> 01:04:08.200]  Well, never mind, they just disappeared right off my board.
[01:04:08.200 --> 01:04:17.200]  Okay, wait for somebody else to call in and be put back up there. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:04:17.200 --> 01:04:22.200]  Alright, so while we're waiting on another caller, I'll wait. There he is. He is back.
[01:04:22.200 --> 01:04:24.200]  Jose?
[01:04:24.200 --> 01:04:25.200]  Yeah?
[01:04:25.200 --> 01:04:28.200]  Alright, what do you got man?
[01:04:28.200 --> 01:04:44.200]  Well, I was wondering, I sent you an email about a question that I came up with. It has to do with the standing of a public pastor.
[01:04:44.200 --> 01:04:49.200]  Standing of a what?
[01:04:49.200 --> 01:04:54.200]  Hello?
[01:04:54.200 --> 01:05:02.200]  Okay, this is getting more than just a little weird. Alright, try it. Okay, Jose, I'm sorry, a standing of a what?
[01:05:02.200 --> 01:05:09.200]  Oh, oh well.
[01:05:09.200 --> 01:05:19.200]  Okay, somehow or other we keep getting, you ought to bear with us, we have a new call screener tonight and things are not coming out exactly like they need to.
[01:05:19.200 --> 01:05:29.200]  So, hang on just a second. Alright, while I'm waiting on Jose to come back, I want to go to who should have been our first caller, and now he's gone again.
[01:05:29.200 --> 01:05:40.200]  Alright, this is getting kind of bouncy. Let's try this again. Alright, Jose, let's start this over. You sent me an email asking about the standing of who for what.
[01:05:40.200 --> 01:05:49.200]  Okay, well let me just read you what I sent you because it's pretty short. In what capacity is the prosecution of this company to establish standing?
[01:05:49.200 --> 01:05:50.200]  Alright.
[01:05:50.200 --> 01:05:56.200]  Wait, wait, wait. In what capacity is the prosecution required to establish standing?
[01:05:56.200 --> 01:06:13.200]  Not required. What are they actually doing? This is a pre-entry challenge that I came up with a couple of weeks ago and I got some pretty good feedback on it, so I wanted to get the opinion yourself and the folks there.
[01:06:13.200 --> 01:06:24.200]  It depends upon how the courts in that particular state have ruled. Let me tell you how they ruled here in Texas. It's stupid, it's idiotic, it is asinine, but this is how they have ruled.
[01:06:24.200 --> 01:06:42.200]  The courts in Texas have ruled, in a case called Trejo v. State, that the prosecutor establishes his standing to prosecute via the filing of a complaint by someone.
[01:06:42.200 --> 01:06:47.200]  The fact that a complaint was filed establishes the prosecutor's standing.
[01:06:47.200 --> 01:06:48.200]  Oh yeah.
[01:06:48.200 --> 01:06:49.200]  Okay.
[01:06:49.200 --> 01:06:51.200]  Oh, you're going to love what I got though.
[01:06:51.200 --> 01:07:01.200]  Okay. Now, the real issue here though is what invokes the jurisdiction of the court in relation to that standing.
[01:07:01.200 --> 01:07:13.200]  And here in Texas, they use the exact same thing. In the lower courts, the court's jurisdiction is invoked because someone filed a complaint.
[01:07:13.200 --> 01:07:28.200]  That's Maloney. They cannot establish jurisdiction until they can first show that the subject matter over which that court has jurisdiction is an issue in the case.
[01:07:28.200 --> 01:07:30.200]  That's my pre-entry challenge.
[01:07:30.200 --> 01:07:57.200]  Okay. And so here in Texas, when it comes to these fine-only offenses, that's the entire reason why we put on a no-transportation defense. Because if you're not engaged in transportation and the prosecution has put forth no evidence to the court to establish its jurisdiction under transportation, then they're not acting under any jurisdiction.
[01:07:57.200 --> 01:08:26.200]  And how they get away with that nine times out of ten is the person starts to argue the merits of the case or allow the use of terms and phrases that apply only to that activity as if they applied to their activity, thus creating a prima facie case that the activity that is being regulated and is the subject matter that grants jurisdiction has been properly invoked.
[01:08:26.200 --> 01:08:54.200]  Right. Now, I've got a question for you. All right. Pretend you're the prosecutor. All right. Is this case being prosecuted in the name of the people? I'm from New York State, of course. The state of New York, on behalf of a corporate entity or an injured party whose name is the people of the state of New York. I'm bringing this up because my previous argument is that I haven't been supplied with sufficient...
[01:08:54.200 --> 01:09:03.200]  Well, no, wait a minute. You brought it up. And if I'm playing the part of the prosecutor, you need to let me address it before you try to explain it. Okay?
[01:09:03.200 --> 01:09:05.200]  Well, yeah, exactly.
[01:09:05.200 --> 01:09:10.200]  All right. So hold on a sec. Let me address it. Let me address your question.
[01:09:10.200 --> 01:09:11.200]  Mm-hmm.
[01:09:11.200 --> 01:09:20.200]  It is being brought in the name of the state of Texas as is required by the Texas Constitution, which is the political body of the people of Texas.
[01:09:20.200 --> 01:09:24.200]  Exactly. That's where I got you.
[01:09:24.200 --> 01:09:25.200]  Why is it where you've got me?
[01:09:25.200 --> 01:09:29.200]  Because you've pursued the name of the people restricted to matters of public or common law.
[01:09:29.200 --> 01:09:32.200]  Whoa, whoa, whoa. Stop, stop, stop, stop, stop.
[01:09:32.200 --> 01:09:33.200]  Okay.
[01:09:33.200 --> 01:09:35.200]  No. No.
[01:09:35.200 --> 01:09:36.200]  No?
[01:09:36.200 --> 01:09:40.200]  The people are responsible for the constitution of your state, correct?
[01:09:40.200 --> 01:09:41.200]  Correct.
[01:09:41.200 --> 01:09:48.200]  The people established the criteria by which the court must name its actions in these courts, right?
[01:09:48.200 --> 01:09:50.200]  Right.
[01:09:50.200 --> 01:09:57.200]  Here in Texas, it says, all criminal prosecutions shall be commenced in and by the authority of the state of Texas.
[01:09:57.200 --> 01:10:04.200]  That's in the constitution. Therefore, your argument will not fly as a rebuttal to that.
[01:10:04.200 --> 01:10:11.200]  It will do nothing to prevent it. It will do nothing to deprive them of jurisdiction.
[01:10:11.200 --> 01:10:21.200]  Jurisdiction was established by that criteria as far as their power to be there, okay?
[01:10:21.200 --> 01:10:31.200]  They still have to have the subject matter to which the offense is made in order to do anything.
[01:10:31.200 --> 01:10:37.200]  Okay, but aren't actions pursued in the name of the people specifically?
[01:10:37.200 --> 01:10:44.200]  Not when the constitution specifically says that is not how it's to be done.
[01:10:44.200 --> 01:10:47.200]  What?
[01:10:47.200 --> 01:10:53.200]  How does the constitution in your state say that all criminal prosecutions must be initiated?
[01:10:53.200 --> 01:10:59.200]  What must be stated on the charging instrument?
[01:10:59.200 --> 01:11:04.200]  What's stated on the charting? Oh, geez, I kind of looked that up. I don't want me to do that.
[01:11:04.200 --> 01:11:10.200]  Right. You've got to look that up because you haven't read it, but you're going off one of these internet presumptions.
[01:11:10.200 --> 01:11:21.200]  Well, the thing about it is, I guarantee you, even if it says all prosecutions must commence in the name of the people of the state of New York,
[01:11:21.200 --> 01:11:27.200]  isn't that what's on the instrument? Because if it's not, then the instrument would be invalid.
[01:11:27.200 --> 01:11:34.200]  And that's what you challenge jurisdiction on, or at least you challenge the form and substance of the instrument.
[01:11:34.200 --> 01:11:45.200]  But if it says that if your state constitution says this is how you will do it, then that is considered to be the people's consensus on how it's done.
[01:11:45.200 --> 01:11:53.200]  You can't go outside of that and say you've got to do it this way or that way in order to have any ability to go forward.
[01:11:53.200 --> 01:11:59.200]  Right. But if a statute is a law but rather a private corporate body of rules...
[01:11:59.200 --> 01:12:08.200]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. You're still relying on too much damn patronut internet information.
[01:12:08.200 --> 01:12:15.200]  A statute is not the actual law. It is the regulatory scheme. Listen to me, please.
[01:12:15.200 --> 01:12:20.200]  It is the regulatory scheme placed on top of the underlying law.
[01:12:20.200 --> 01:12:22.200]  Exactly.
[01:12:22.200 --> 01:12:31.200]  However, that's why you go to the underlying law to make any argument of merit, not to the statute itself.
[01:12:31.200 --> 01:12:35.200]  If you show that the statute is not in agreement with the underlying law,
[01:12:35.200 --> 01:12:42.200]  then you challenge the validity of the statute because there's no force and effect of law behind it.
[01:12:42.200 --> 01:12:43.200]  Right.
[01:12:43.200 --> 01:12:52.200]  That has nothing to do with the initiation of the proceeding itself in the name of this, that, or the other.
[01:12:52.200 --> 01:12:53.200]  Uh-huh.
[01:12:53.200 --> 01:13:01.200]  You're trying to use one as the lever to get to the other, and that isn't going to work.
[01:13:01.200 --> 01:13:11.200]  Because you have to get past the authority to prosecute to get to the point you're talking about as far as the statute goes.
[01:13:11.200 --> 01:13:12.200]  Right.
[01:13:12.200 --> 01:13:20.200]  They can't take you into a butcher shop and commandeer the guy behind the counter to act as a magistrate and prosecute, can they?
[01:13:20.200 --> 01:13:26.200]  Because he's not in and by the authority of the state of New York, or in and by the authority of the people of New York, is he?
[01:13:26.200 --> 01:13:27.200]  Right.
[01:13:27.200 --> 01:13:28.200]  Okay.
[01:13:28.200 --> 01:13:31.200]  Therefore, that they can't do.
[01:13:31.200 --> 01:13:32.200]  But...
[01:13:32.200 --> 01:13:38.200]  But the state of New York has two jurisdictions, private and public.
[01:13:38.200 --> 01:13:41.200]  What is your point?
[01:13:41.200 --> 01:13:42.200]  My point is...
[01:13:42.200 --> 01:13:46.200]  The point is, is they can't invoke either of them without that, can they?
[01:13:46.200 --> 01:13:54.200]  If they're prosecuting it, whether privately or publicly, it still must start in and by the authority of such and such.
[01:13:54.200 --> 01:13:55.200]  Right.
[01:13:55.200 --> 01:13:56.200]  Okay?
[01:13:56.200 --> 01:14:06.200]  So that is completely irrelevant to what you're talking about on the two public and privates, because you can't get there until you get past that.
[01:14:06.200 --> 01:14:21.200]  And your entire opening question to me just blew up in your face, because the Constitution of the state gave me that power and said, this is how we do it.
[01:14:21.200 --> 01:14:26.200]  Only when you're exercising political jurisdiction.
[01:14:26.200 --> 01:14:33.200]  If you're exercising private jurisdiction, there's an argument.
[01:14:33.200 --> 01:14:36.200]  How do you figure that?
[01:14:36.200 --> 01:14:37.200]  Okay.
[01:14:37.200 --> 01:14:39.200]  Well, we'll get into the...
[01:14:39.200 --> 01:14:40.200]  We'll get into the...
[01:14:40.200 --> 01:14:41.200]  Okay.
[01:14:41.200 --> 01:14:42.200]  A corporation.
[01:14:42.200 --> 01:14:43.200]  All right.
[01:14:43.200 --> 01:14:46.200]  Let me get to it here.
[01:14:46.200 --> 01:14:47.200]  Geez.
[01:14:47.200 --> 01:14:48.200]  Okay.
[01:14:48.200 --> 01:14:53.200]  The government, by becoming a corporator, lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen.
[01:14:53.200 --> 01:14:54.200]  Whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:14:54.200 --> 01:14:55.200]  Where did you get that?
[01:14:55.200 --> 01:14:58.200]  Where did you get that?
[01:14:58.200 --> 01:15:04.200]  28 U.S.C. 3002 and 22 U.S.C. 260.
[01:15:04.200 --> 01:15:06.200]  And then the Bank of U.S.C.
[01:15:06.200 --> 01:15:07.200]  Whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:15:07.200 --> 01:15:09.200]  Let me tell you why you're misreading that.
[01:15:09.200 --> 01:15:16.200]  You go back and misread that, and those statutes are dealing when they are operating under contract.
[01:15:16.200 --> 01:15:17.200]  Yes.
[01:15:17.200 --> 01:15:18.200]  Okay.
[01:15:18.200 --> 01:15:22.200]  Well, we're not talking about operating under contract here.
[01:15:22.200 --> 01:15:25.200]  Not unless you can produce a contract.
[01:15:25.200 --> 01:15:26.200]  Exactly.
[01:15:26.200 --> 01:15:32.200]  We're talking a criminal prosecution, are we not, or there wouldn't be a prosecutor?
[01:15:32.200 --> 01:15:33.200]  No.
[01:15:33.200 --> 01:15:35.200]  We're talking about violation of contract.
[01:15:35.200 --> 01:15:36.200]  Whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:15:36.200 --> 01:15:37.200]  Vehicle.
[01:15:37.200 --> 01:15:38.200]  Whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:15:38.200 --> 01:15:39.200]  Hold on.
[01:15:39.200 --> 01:15:40.200]  Uh-huh.
[01:15:40.200 --> 01:15:46.200]  It depends on whether or not they're attempting to charge that alleged offense under that
[01:15:46.200 --> 01:15:49.200]  code as civil or criminal.
[01:15:49.200 --> 01:15:50.200]  Yeah.
[01:15:50.200 --> 01:15:51.200]  Okay.
[01:15:51.200 --> 01:15:52.200]  Well, civil.
[01:15:52.200 --> 01:15:55.200]  If it's civil, there's not a prosecutor.
[01:15:55.200 --> 01:16:02.200]  There may be a plaintiff who's suing you, but there is not a prosecutor if it's civil.
[01:16:02.200 --> 01:16:04.200]  Yep.
[01:16:04.200 --> 01:16:08.200]  So which one are we dealing with?
[01:16:08.200 --> 01:16:15.200]  Well, presently, the charges that I'm dealing with, six of them are civil.
[01:16:15.200 --> 01:16:17.200]  They're traffic infractions.
[01:16:17.200 --> 01:16:18.200]  Okay.
[01:16:18.200 --> 01:16:22.200]  Are infractions crimes in New York?
[01:16:22.200 --> 01:16:23.200]  No.
[01:16:23.200 --> 01:16:24.200]  Okay.
[01:16:24.200 --> 01:16:31.200]  If infractions are not crimes in New York, and you can prove that, how did you get in
[01:16:31.200 --> 01:16:33.200]  receipt of those citations?
[01:16:33.200 --> 01:16:34.200]  And hang on to your answer.
[01:16:34.200 --> 01:16:37.200]  I'm about to take a break, and we'll pick it up on the other side.
[01:16:37.200 --> 01:16:42.200]  But I need you to tell me how you came to be in possession of those citations.
[01:16:42.200 --> 01:16:45.200]  So hang on just a minute, and we'll take a break and pick that up.
[01:16:45.200 --> 01:16:47.200]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:16:47.200 --> 01:17:00.200]  We'll be right back, so y'all hang in there.
[01:17:00.200 --> 01:17:04.200]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:17:04.200 --> 01:17:08.200]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:08.200 --> 01:17:14.200]  We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.200 --> 01:17:18.200]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:18.200 --> 01:17:24.200]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:24.200 --> 01:17:27.200]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:27.200 --> 01:17:32.200]  In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollenburks.
[01:17:32.200 --> 01:17:36.200]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products,
[01:17:36.200 --> 01:17:39.200]  ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:39.200 --> 01:17:43.200]  We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.200 --> 01:17:46.200]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:46.200 --> 01:17:51.200]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.200 --> 01:17:54.200]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.200 --> 01:18:00.200]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.200 --> 01:18:06.200]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.200 --> 01:18:11.200]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.200 --> 01:18:17.200]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.200 --> 01:18:22.200]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:22.200 --> 01:18:25.200]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.200 --> 01:18:31.200]  Logos Serial Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.200 --> 01:18:36.200]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much we became a marketing distributor
[01:18:36.200 --> 01:18:40.200]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.200 --> 01:18:48.200]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:48.200 --> 01:18:52.200]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.200 --> 01:18:59.200]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:59.200 --> 01:19:01.200]  Order now.
[01:19:01.200 --> 01:19:11.200]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:31.200 --> 01:19:37.200]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:37.200 --> 01:19:44.200]  This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984, and we're talking to Jose in New York.
[01:19:44.200 --> 01:19:46.200]  All right, Jose, let's continue this on.
[01:19:46.200 --> 01:19:51.200]  Now, how did you come to be in possession of the citations that your cases are based on?
[01:19:51.200 --> 01:19:58.200]  Okay, a friend of mine bought a car in a private sale.
[01:19:58.200 --> 01:20:02.200]  Well, I don't need the whole detailed story.
[01:20:02.200 --> 01:20:05.200]  How did you get them?
[01:20:05.200 --> 01:20:08.200]  Were you pulled over by a cop?
[01:20:08.200 --> 01:20:09.200]  Yep.
[01:20:09.200 --> 01:20:14.200]  Okay, so you were pulled over by a cop and issued the citations?
[01:20:14.200 --> 01:20:15.200]  He was, yes.
[01:20:15.200 --> 01:20:16.200]  Okay, he was.
[01:20:16.200 --> 01:20:19.200]  Was he stopped somewhere when the cop approached him,
[01:20:19.200 --> 01:20:24.200]  or did the cop seize his person as he was moving down the highway in the car?
[01:20:24.200 --> 01:20:26.200]  The cop seized his person.
[01:20:26.200 --> 01:20:33.200]  Okay, so in relation to this, this matter is civil, correct?
[01:20:33.200 --> 01:20:34.200]  Both civil and criminal.
[01:20:34.200 --> 01:20:41.200]  Well, it will be civil because the one criminal charge can't stand.
[01:20:41.200 --> 01:20:42.200]  What?
[01:20:42.200 --> 01:20:47.200]  One of the charges was driving out a suspended license.
[01:20:47.200 --> 01:20:50.200]  He never, ever owned a license.
[01:20:50.200 --> 01:20:53.200]  Right, it can't be suspended if it was never issued.
[01:20:53.200 --> 01:20:54.200]  Correct, yep.
[01:20:54.200 --> 01:20:58.200]  Okay, so here's the problem.
[01:20:58.200 --> 01:21:05.200]  Where does an officer get the power to arrest in a civil matter?
[01:21:05.200 --> 01:21:06.200]  He doesn't.
[01:21:06.200 --> 01:21:07.200]  Exactly.
[01:21:07.200 --> 01:21:11.200]  What does your state constitution and your code of criminal procedure
[01:21:11.200 --> 01:21:18.200]  or whatever it is in New York say as to the authority to make a warrantless arrest?
[01:21:18.200 --> 01:21:24.200]  Well, he's got to seize the person committing a felony.
[01:21:24.200 --> 01:21:27.200]  It has to be committed a felony?
[01:21:27.200 --> 01:21:31.200]  He can only make a warrantless arrest if the crime is a felony?
[01:21:31.200 --> 01:21:34.200]  Well, no, not easy.
[01:21:34.200 --> 01:21:35.200]  Yeah, he can do it.
[01:21:35.200 --> 01:21:36.200]  It's a misdemeanor too.
[01:21:36.200 --> 01:21:38.200]  He can write him a citation.
[01:21:38.200 --> 01:21:39.200]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:21:39.200 --> 01:21:40.200]  Wait a minute.
[01:21:40.200 --> 01:21:41.200]  Wait a minute.
[01:21:41.200 --> 01:21:42.200]  You need to know how it reads.
[01:21:42.200 --> 01:21:45.200]  This is the way it reads in Texas, okay?
[01:21:45.200 --> 01:21:46.200]  Mm-hmm.
[01:21:46.200 --> 01:21:49.200]  In Chapter 14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
[01:21:49.200 --> 01:21:54.200]  a warrantless arrest is authorized for any felony or breach of the peace
[01:21:54.200 --> 01:22:01.200]  committed in the arresting officer or person's presence or view, okay?
[01:22:01.200 --> 01:22:06.200]  Now, notice, breach of the peace, not simply a misdemeanor.
[01:22:06.200 --> 01:22:15.200]  A breach of the peace is what's required or a felony to arrest without a warrant, okay?
[01:22:15.200 --> 01:22:20.200]  So unless the officer can demonstrate a breach of the peace,
[01:22:20.200 --> 01:22:25.200]  which would be a crime, he has no authority to arrest without a warrant.
[01:22:25.200 --> 01:22:31.200]  And in the case of a civil matter, you cannot arrest at all because you can't get a warrant,
[01:22:31.200 --> 01:22:35.200]  because a warrant can only be issued based upon probable cause,
[01:22:35.200 --> 01:22:38.200]  which is only related to criminal activity, right?
[01:22:38.200 --> 01:22:39.200]  Correct, yes.
[01:22:39.200 --> 01:22:47.200]  Which makes the officer seizure of your friend on the highway what?
[01:22:47.200 --> 01:22:50.200]  A felony, a bunch of felonies decrying.
[01:22:50.200 --> 01:22:53.200]  Unconstitutional and illegal.
[01:22:53.200 --> 01:22:54.200]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:22:54.200 --> 01:22:55.200]  Okay.
[01:22:55.200 --> 01:23:02.200]  Therefore, anything that follows is fruit of the poison tree, isn't it?
[01:23:02.200 --> 01:23:05.200]  It is.
[01:23:05.200 --> 01:23:10.200]  Do you guys make this more complicated from the get-go than you need to?
[01:23:10.200 --> 01:23:14.200]  First off, where was the authority to make the stop?
[01:23:14.200 --> 01:23:18.200]  That's always the first question you got to get the answer to.
[01:23:18.200 --> 01:23:22.200]  What crime are you saying I committed that authorized you to do this?
[01:23:22.200 --> 01:23:23.200]  Well, there is no crime.
[01:23:23.200 --> 01:23:25.200]  It's a civil infraction.
[01:23:25.200 --> 01:23:32.200]  Then you stopped me with a gun on your hip and the force of your uniform and badge
[01:23:32.200 --> 01:23:39.200]  for no crime and held me restricted in my liberty against my will
[01:23:39.200 --> 01:23:43.200]  to issue me a civil infraction citation.
[01:23:43.200 --> 01:23:47.200]  Are you aware that's false imprisonment, officer?
[01:23:47.200 --> 01:23:50.200]  Mm-hmm. Yep, yep.
[01:23:50.200 --> 01:23:53.200]  Okay.
[01:23:53.200 --> 01:23:59.200]  I wanted to play devil, well, basically I wanted to challenge you on one point.
[01:23:59.200 --> 01:24:08.200]  It has to do with a case called Eads v. Marks, 49 Pacific 7, 2nd, 5760.
[01:24:08.200 --> 01:24:14.200]  What they say in this case is that no civil or criminal cause of action can arise
[01:24:14.200 --> 01:24:16.200]  lest there be a contract.
[01:24:16.200 --> 01:24:18.200]  Now, this is Texas law.
[01:24:18.200 --> 01:24:19.200]  Well, it's a Texas case.
[01:24:19.200 --> 01:24:24.200]  Well, send me a copy of that case because I would love to see that.
[01:24:24.200 --> 01:24:26.200]  Well, yeah.
[01:24:26.200 --> 01:24:31.200]  There's always a presumption a contract exists and that the responding party is a corporation.
[01:24:31.200 --> 01:24:37.200]  Under Rule 52, which is the same in all states, as in the federal rules,
[01:24:37.200 --> 01:24:42.200]  the Texas Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit has ruled of the finding of fact by the court
[01:24:42.200 --> 01:24:46.200]  that a failure of an adverse party to deny under oath that he has incorporated
[01:24:46.200 --> 01:24:49.200]  dispenses within necessity of proof of the fact.
[01:24:49.200 --> 01:24:55.200]  Thus the presumption becomes a finding of fact by the court unless rebutted before trial.
[01:24:55.200 --> 01:25:01.200]  And my response to that was the fraudulently presumed quasi-contract is to advise the
[01:25:01.200 --> 01:25:08.200]  declarant with the city-state agency is void for fraud ab initio from the beginning
[01:25:08.200 --> 01:25:10.200]  because the de facto state cannot...
[01:25:10.200 --> 01:25:12.200]  Have you shepardized that case?
[01:25:12.200 --> 01:25:13.200]  Huh?
[01:25:13.200 --> 01:25:15.200]  Have you shepardized that case?
[01:25:15.200 --> 01:25:18.200]  No, I haven't.
[01:25:18.200 --> 01:25:20.200]  Well, you better.
[01:25:20.200 --> 01:25:21.200]  Yeah, I know.
[01:25:21.200 --> 01:25:22.200]  I got to fuel them.
[01:25:22.200 --> 01:25:23.200]  I still got to do.
[01:25:23.200 --> 01:25:31.200]  But some of the guys that I've been doing stuff with have used this number of times,
[01:25:31.200 --> 01:25:33.200]  so it seems to be okay.
[01:25:33.200 --> 01:25:37.200]  It's holding up for them, but you know.
[01:25:37.200 --> 01:25:43.200]  Well, let's see if maybe it's because the prosecutor hadn't bothered to look it up either.
[01:25:43.200 --> 01:25:46.200]  Yeah, that's true too.
[01:25:46.200 --> 01:25:59.200]  But at any rate, yeah, I'm definitely going to shepardize all this stuff.
[01:25:59.200 --> 01:26:00.200]  Okay.
[01:26:00.200 --> 01:26:01.200]  Well, that's good.
[01:26:01.200 --> 01:26:04.200]  I mean, you want to build up as big a firewall as possible.
[01:26:04.200 --> 01:26:08.200]  Go ahead and use it if you can validate it and show that it will do what you want it to do,
[01:26:08.200 --> 01:26:14.200]  or at least should, but be prepared to follow up with what I just gave you if it doesn't
[01:26:14.200 --> 01:26:19.200]  because that right there is something they cannot deny.
[01:26:19.200 --> 01:26:29.200]  The officer had no authority to seize anyone if at their liberty in a civil matter.
[01:26:29.200 --> 01:26:31.200]  Well, I'm going to throw that one in there.
[01:26:31.200 --> 01:26:33.200]  It's not in my arguments.
[01:26:33.200 --> 01:26:40.200]  My opening argument was that I took issue with inadequate written notice
[01:26:40.200 --> 01:26:44.200]  and insufficient service of process that would otherwise be able to make an informed,
[01:26:44.200 --> 01:26:46.200]  intelligent, and voluntary plea.
[01:26:46.200 --> 01:26:49.200]  Well, notice is also something to attack them on.
[01:26:49.200 --> 01:26:51.200]  Sure, no problem there.
[01:26:51.200 --> 01:26:57.200]  But the more things you show that they lack any lawful basis for their actions or to proceed,
[01:26:57.200 --> 01:27:03.200]  the better off you are because it's more hurdles they have to overcome to move forward.
[01:27:03.200 --> 01:27:10.200]  And the more that you put those hurdles up, each hurdle costs them time and money to overcome.
[01:27:10.200 --> 01:27:12.200]  I've been to court on this thing four times.
[01:27:12.200 --> 01:27:17.200]  I've been defending this guy as my next friend.
[01:27:17.200 --> 01:27:22.200]  Of course, the judge and I got in a battle over whether or not I'd be allowed to when I won.
[01:27:22.200 --> 01:27:27.200]  The last time I went there, he decided to reverse his decision.
[01:27:27.200 --> 01:27:32.200]  And I said, you're obstructing his right to counsel.
[01:27:32.200 --> 01:27:33.200]  What the heck do you think you're doing?
[01:27:33.200 --> 01:27:35.200]  You don't think I'm going to take that to federal court?
[01:27:35.200 --> 01:27:36.200]  Are you crazy?
[01:27:36.200 --> 01:27:44.200]  And then he told my friend that if he catches him traveling while this is going on,
[01:27:44.200 --> 01:27:45.200]  he's going to hold him in tenth of court.
[01:27:45.200 --> 01:27:47.200]  And I'm like, Judge, you just made me a ton of money.
[01:27:47.200 --> 01:27:49.200]  Are you stupid?
[01:27:49.200 --> 01:27:50.200]  It's unbelievable.
[01:27:50.200 --> 01:27:54.200]  Yeah, the judge is punishing him without a trial.
[01:27:54.200 --> 01:27:56.200]  Yes.
[01:27:56.200 --> 01:28:00.200]  And the judge has no jurisdictional authority to do that,
[01:28:00.200 --> 01:28:04.200]  move to disqualify this judge and file a suit against him immediately,
[01:28:04.200 --> 01:28:05.200]  because he has no immunity.
[01:28:05.200 --> 01:28:08.200]  He's not acting in a judicial capacity when he does that.
[01:28:08.200 --> 01:28:10.200]  He's acting in an executive.
[01:28:10.200 --> 01:28:11.200]  Exactly.
[01:28:11.200 --> 01:28:13.200]  And that was a judicial activity committed.
[01:28:13.200 --> 01:28:14.200]  No, no, no.
[01:28:14.200 --> 01:28:19.200]  He was acting entirely of his personal determinations.
[01:28:19.200 --> 01:28:22.200]  It was not governmental in any way.
[01:28:22.200 --> 01:28:28.200]  If it was not based upon law, it cannot be governmental, can it?
[01:28:28.200 --> 01:28:30.200]  You're 100% right.
[01:28:30.200 --> 01:28:31.200]  That's right.
[01:28:31.200 --> 01:28:34.200]  You're correct.
[01:28:34.200 --> 01:28:39.200]  And I didn't make that point, that it was a – I called it a quasi-judicial act,
[01:28:39.200 --> 01:28:44.200]  but I don't know, maybe I should just say – you know what I'm saying?
[01:28:44.200 --> 01:28:48.200]  Yeah, no, it was a personal determination to violate the law
[01:28:48.200 --> 01:28:51.200]  and to punish an individual without a trial.
[01:28:51.200 --> 01:28:56.200]  So the judge has proven that he can be neither fair nor impartial,
[01:28:56.200 --> 01:28:59.200]  that he is judicially incompetent,
[01:28:59.200 --> 01:29:03.200]  and that he is not qualified to hold that position,
[01:29:03.200 --> 01:29:10.200]  or he would know that he cannot punish an individual without a proper conviction.
[01:29:10.200 --> 01:29:11.200]  Oh, that's phenomenal.
[01:29:11.200 --> 01:29:12.200]  Yep, yep.
[01:29:12.200 --> 01:29:15.200]  I'm going to use it.
[01:29:15.200 --> 01:29:18.200]  I just got in a battle with a Herkimer judge two weeks ago,
[01:29:18.200 --> 01:29:22.200]  and the guy hit him down, and the prosecutor shook my hand
[01:29:22.200 --> 01:29:24.200]  and told me I did a good job.
[01:29:24.200 --> 01:29:29.200]  And I was expecting the judge to take him to, you know, before a real judge
[01:29:29.200 --> 01:29:31.200]  in an Article III court.
[01:29:31.200 --> 01:29:32.200]  And –
[01:29:32.200 --> 01:29:33.200]  Good luck finding one.
[01:29:33.200 --> 01:29:37.200]  Officer, I went in after I got fired, so it worked out.
[01:29:37.200 --> 01:29:39.200]  Well, that's good.
[01:29:39.200 --> 01:29:42.200]  Well, does this help you with what you originally called me for?
[01:29:42.200 --> 01:29:43.200]  What?
[01:29:43.200 --> 01:29:46.200]  Does this help with what you originally called me about?
[01:29:46.200 --> 01:29:48.200]  Phenomenally, yes.
[01:29:48.200 --> 01:29:49.200]  Okay, all right.
[01:29:49.200 --> 01:29:51.200]  Well, I'm going to let you go and get another caller on the other side of the break,
[01:29:51.200 --> 01:29:53.200]  is that okay?
[01:29:53.200 --> 01:29:54.200]  Yeah, thank you.
[01:29:54.200 --> 01:29:55.200]  All right, thanks for calling in.
[01:29:55.200 --> 01:29:57.200]  All right, folks, y'all hang on.
[01:29:57.200 --> 01:30:01.200]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:01.200 --> 01:30:05.200]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:30:05.200 --> 01:30:08.200]  They guarantee it is specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:30:08.200 --> 01:30:10.200]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:30:10.200 --> 01:30:13.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way
[01:30:13.200 --> 01:30:16.200]  to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[01:30:16.200 --> 01:30:18.200]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.200 --> 01:30:22.200]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.200 --> 01:30:27.200]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:27.200 --> 01:30:32.200]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.200 --> 01:30:35.200]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.200 --> 01:30:38.200]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:38.200 --> 01:30:42.200]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.200 --> 01:30:46.200]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.200 --> 01:30:50.200]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass,
[01:30:50.200 --> 01:30:51.200]  or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:30:51.200 --> 01:30:55.200]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom
[01:30:55.200 --> 01:30:57.200]  from unreasonable search and seizure.
[01:30:57.200 --> 01:31:00.200]  Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it?
[01:31:00.200 --> 01:31:03.200]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights
[01:31:03.200 --> 01:31:05.200]  in the name of security.
[01:31:05.200 --> 01:31:09.200]  Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:31:09.200 --> 01:31:13.200]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause,
[01:31:13.200 --> 01:31:16.200]  I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:31:16.200 --> 01:31:19.200]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights
[01:31:19.200 --> 01:31:23.200]  and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:31:23.200 --> 01:31:30.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.200 --> 01:31:35.200]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:35.200 --> 01:31:37.200]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:37.200 --> 01:31:42.200]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.200 --> 01:31:45.200]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives,
[01:31:45.200 --> 01:31:48.200]  and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.200 --> 01:31:50.200]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.200 --> 01:31:53.200]  I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.200 --> 01:31:57.200]  I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.200 --> 01:32:21.200]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:28.200 --> 01:32:31.200]  to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:31.200 --> 01:32:38.200]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.200 --> 01:32:40.200]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:40.200 --> 01:32:45.200]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.200 --> 01:32:50.200]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.200 --> 01:32:56.200]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.200 --> 01:32:58.200]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.200 --> 01:33:27.200]  Me and I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:28.200 --> 01:33:34.200]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:34.200 --> 01:33:38.200]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and our next caller up is Mark in Florida.
[01:33:38.200 --> 01:33:40.200]  Mark, what do you got?
[01:33:40.200 --> 01:33:58.200]  My last arrest, I may have mentioned it, two masterminders for obstructing traffic and a...
[01:33:58.200 --> 01:34:01.200]  Now, why would you be doing that?
[01:34:01.200 --> 01:34:05.200]  Well, I wasn't.
[01:34:05.200 --> 01:34:07.200]  Well, all right.
[01:34:07.200 --> 01:34:10.200]  I was walking beside the road.
[01:34:10.200 --> 01:34:12.200]  I don't block any traffic.
[01:34:12.200 --> 01:34:14.200]  Okay.
[01:34:14.200 --> 01:34:21.200]  And the other one's a citation for expired Texas tags more than six months.
[01:34:21.200 --> 01:34:23.200]  Again, I'm in Florida.
[01:34:23.200 --> 01:34:25.200]  Right.
[01:34:25.200 --> 01:34:33.200]  Anyway, they took me to the county substation as a county deputy.
[01:34:33.200 --> 01:34:43.200]  They wanted to arrest me a month before, and they dismissed that case the next morning.
[01:34:43.200 --> 01:34:46.200]  Did they tell you why?
[01:34:46.200 --> 01:34:48.200]  No, I had to look it up.
[01:34:48.200 --> 01:34:50.200]  It was declined by the prosecutor.
[01:34:50.200 --> 01:34:53.200]  Do you know why?
[01:34:53.200 --> 01:34:55.200]  No, I do not.
[01:34:55.200 --> 01:34:57.200]  Care to make a guess?
[01:34:57.200 --> 01:34:59.200]  I have an assumption.
[01:34:59.200 --> 01:35:05.200]  Well, they stole $15 off of me so I wouldn't have enough money to make bail.
[01:35:05.200 --> 01:35:06.200]  Bail was 25.
[01:35:06.200 --> 01:35:09.200]  I got to jail with $21.
[01:35:09.200 --> 01:35:12.200]  Next morning when I got out, I had zero.
[01:35:12.200 --> 01:35:14.200]  I think we discussed this before.
[01:35:14.200 --> 01:35:16.200]  I know we did.
[01:35:16.200 --> 01:35:21.200]  Anyway, went before the magistrate the next morning, and my main concern was I didn't have bail money.
[01:35:21.200 --> 01:35:23.200]  I wanted out of jail.
[01:35:23.200 --> 01:35:27.200]  So I made an argument to be released to ROR, and I won that.
[01:35:27.200 --> 01:35:34.200]  They wanted to release me, and I found out later they dismissed the case.
[01:35:34.200 --> 01:35:36.200]  Well, let me ask this.
[01:35:36.200 --> 01:35:42.200]  How would Florida enforce Texas law?
[01:35:42.200 --> 01:35:47.200]  That's exactly my point.
[01:35:47.200 --> 01:35:52.200]  Where do they make this man a tax collector for Texas?
[01:35:52.200 --> 01:35:58.200]  I'm sure a license be, you know, registration is listed by Texas as a tax.
[01:35:58.200 --> 01:36:00.200]  Is it not?
[01:36:00.200 --> 01:36:03.200]  Well, it doesn't matter what they listed by.
[01:36:03.200 --> 01:36:09.200]  The entire Texas transportation code is unconstitutional, and I'm about to prove that in the court of law.
[01:36:09.200 --> 01:36:10.200]  Yes, sir.
[01:36:10.200 --> 01:36:14.200]  I fully agree with it, and I support what you're doing.
[01:36:14.200 --> 01:36:16.200]  Fully support it.
[01:36:16.200 --> 01:36:19.200]  I would advise you start wearing a bulletproof vest, though.
[01:36:19.200 --> 01:36:20.200]  Yeah, well.
[01:36:20.200 --> 01:36:21.200]  Seriously?
[01:36:21.200 --> 01:36:24.200]  That's the whole reason why I try to educate as many people as possible.
[01:36:24.200 --> 01:36:29.200]  That way, it won't do them any good to come after me.
[01:36:29.200 --> 01:36:30.200]  Exactly.
[01:36:30.200 --> 01:36:31.200]  Exactly.
[01:36:31.200 --> 01:36:39.200]  So anyway, this new case, the two misdemeanors, one of them was for the seventh of the month.
[01:36:39.200 --> 01:36:42.200]  That was the last month.
[01:36:42.200 --> 01:36:51.200]  And that was also the day that he wrote the, supposedly charged me for driving with expired tags.
[01:36:51.200 --> 01:36:54.200]  Of course, I explained to him I don't drive.
[01:36:54.200 --> 01:37:03.200]  But it was the next day when he arrested me and charged me with obstructing traffic that day also.
[01:37:03.200 --> 01:37:06.200]  Oh, go after him.
[01:37:06.200 --> 01:37:14.200]  Almost guaranteed they must make any such arrest at the time of the commission of the act,
[01:37:14.200 --> 01:37:18.200]  not after the fact unless they've acquired a warrant.
[01:37:18.200 --> 01:37:21.200]  Did he have a warrant here?
[01:37:21.200 --> 01:37:22.200]  Oh, no.
[01:37:22.200 --> 01:37:24.200]  No, this is all warrantless arrest.
[01:37:24.200 --> 01:37:26.200]  Oh, go after that cop.
[01:37:26.200 --> 01:37:32.200]  There is no way that's legal, not even in Florida.
[01:37:32.200 --> 01:37:40.200]  Well, he alibited in the affidavit that he saw me and he circled back and I was gone.
[01:37:40.200 --> 01:37:43.200]  And this was at 5.40 p.m.
[01:37:43.200 --> 01:37:48.200]  And then at 7 p.m., he sees me driving out of the park, followed me, ran my tags.
[01:37:48.200 --> 01:37:54.200]  He said it was taking dispatch a long time to come back with the information.
[01:37:54.200 --> 01:37:58.200]  Traffic got congested and he turned off.
[01:37:58.200 --> 01:38:06.200]  Now, do you turn off when you're following a man you saw create a misdemeanor the day before?
[01:38:06.200 --> 01:38:07.200]  Do you believe any of that?
[01:38:07.200 --> 01:38:13.200]  Well, the thing about it is it doesn't matter if I saw them commit a misdemeanor the day before.
[01:38:13.200 --> 01:38:20.200]  The only thing I would have any power to do at that point, according to the case law,
[01:38:20.200 --> 01:38:24.200]  is to follow you to wherever it is you're going,
[01:38:24.200 --> 01:38:29.200]  request a warrant based upon probable cause and someone to bring that warrant to me,
[01:38:29.200 --> 01:38:34.200]  and then execute the arrest.
[01:38:34.200 --> 01:38:39.200]  But until then, I could not arrest you for something you did yesterday
[01:38:39.200 --> 01:38:47.200]  unless you were attempting to escape and it was a felony.
[01:38:47.200 --> 01:38:52.200]  See, Texas has case law here that makes it very clear that, for instance,
[01:38:52.200 --> 01:38:56.200]  we had a bank robbery in Texas back in the 60s.
[01:38:56.200 --> 01:39:02.200]  The officer found a man who matched the description of one of the holdup men
[01:39:02.200 --> 01:39:05.200]  the same day as the bank robbery,
[01:39:05.200 --> 01:39:12.200]  but the man was sitting at his house watching television when the officer saw him.
[01:39:12.200 --> 01:39:17.200]  He burst into the house, seized the guy and placed him under arrest,
[01:39:17.200 --> 01:39:22.200]  and the court ruled the arrest was illegal because the person,
[01:39:22.200 --> 01:39:27.200]  even though they had allegedly committed a felony, was not attempting to escape.
[01:39:27.200 --> 01:39:36.200]  Therefore, the reasoning was the officer had ample time and opportunity to acquire a proper warrant.
[01:39:36.200 --> 01:39:38.200]  Okay, okay.
[01:39:38.200 --> 01:39:43.200]  Now, if that's true in a felony, how can it not be true in a misdemeanor?
[01:39:43.200 --> 01:39:47.200]  Because here the case law says that in a misdemeanor,
[01:39:47.200 --> 01:39:51.200]  they can only arrest if the misdemeanor is committed in their presence or view
[01:39:51.200 --> 01:39:56.200]  and it constitutes a breach of the peace.
[01:39:56.200 --> 01:39:58.200]  Okay.
[01:39:58.200 --> 01:40:02.200]  So you need to see what it says in that regard in Florida.
[01:40:02.200 --> 01:40:04.200]  All right, I'll check into that.
[01:40:04.200 --> 01:40:07.200]  They took me to the substation and ended up having me,
[01:40:07.200 --> 01:40:11.200]  I talked to the supervisor again, the sergeant, got nowhere,
[01:40:11.200 --> 01:40:14.200]  and I had to speak to the lieutenant again.
[01:40:14.200 --> 01:40:18.200]  And just like the time before, he said, I'm the senior man here.
[01:40:18.200 --> 01:40:20.200]  The lieutenant's not here.
[01:40:20.200 --> 01:40:27.200]  I don't know how that can be, but anyway, they had me sign the tickets and released me.
[01:40:27.200 --> 01:40:29.200]  Made me walk all the way back.
[01:40:29.200 --> 01:40:33.200]  It's almost four miles back at night.
[01:40:33.200 --> 01:40:38.200]  And I was wondering, can they do that?
[01:40:38.200 --> 01:40:42.200]  Where was your car?
[01:40:42.200 --> 01:40:48.200]  It was in the park, almost four miles from the substation.
[01:40:48.200 --> 01:40:52.200]  So they didn't impound your car?
[01:40:52.200 --> 01:40:58.200]  He put on the affidavit that the vehicle was towed, my recreational commands.
[01:40:58.200 --> 01:41:00.200]  Was it?
[01:41:00.200 --> 01:41:02.200]  No.
[01:41:02.200 --> 01:41:05.200]  So it was still in the park when you got there?
[01:41:05.200 --> 01:41:06.200]  Yes, sir.
[01:41:06.200 --> 01:41:09.200]  Okay.
[01:41:09.200 --> 01:41:15.200]  They're not required to take you back, but you would think that would be a common courtesy,
[01:41:15.200 --> 01:41:19.200]  since they're supposed to be public servants.
[01:41:19.200 --> 01:41:26.200]  But the problem there is, for them, is that all that time that they've had you down there
[01:41:26.200 --> 01:41:32.200]  and made you do that walking and everything else, that's all time you can sue them for.
[01:41:32.200 --> 01:41:38.200]  Yeah, yeah, because I believe this is as good as dismissed.
[01:41:38.200 --> 01:41:44.200]  When I went to my arraignment, had a new lady judge.
[01:41:44.200 --> 01:41:45.200]  Wait a minute.
[01:41:45.200 --> 01:41:50.200]  How could you get arraigned if they dismissed it?
[01:41:50.200 --> 01:41:53.200]  The charge a month before was dismissed.
[01:41:53.200 --> 01:41:57.200]  These were new charges.
[01:41:57.200 --> 01:42:01.200]  Two misdemeanors and the registration.
[01:42:01.200 --> 01:42:04.200]  Okay.
[01:42:04.200 --> 01:42:14.200]  The misdemeanor the month before got dismissed the next morning, right after court.
[01:42:14.200 --> 01:42:17.200]  So anyway, I went to the arraignment for this.
[01:42:17.200 --> 01:42:22.200]  They actually served me a summons, so that was a first.
[01:42:22.200 --> 01:42:30.200]  But I went to court and the new lady judge, I kind of looked her up, read up on her a little bit.
[01:42:30.200 --> 01:42:39.200]  And the day before, I listened to agenda talk 20, or agenda 21 talk, and Don and Shannon,
[01:42:39.200 --> 01:42:44.200]  and Shannon was talking about a letter that they filed with the court.
[01:42:44.200 --> 01:42:49.200]  And I kind of roughed that out and took it in the day before.
[01:42:49.200 --> 01:42:55.200]  It wasn't exactly the way he does it, but basically asked five questions.
[01:42:55.200 --> 01:43:01.200]  Five simple questions, you know, the name of the accuser, the name of the witnesses,
[01:43:01.200 --> 01:43:15.200]  to verify the accuser's statements, a list of damages, and a true copy of the criminal complaint form,
[01:43:15.200 --> 01:43:23.200]  and a copy of the contract for public law that was violated.
[01:43:23.200 --> 01:43:29.200]  That's a very rough, very crude version of his.
[01:43:29.200 --> 01:43:35.200]  But that seemed to throw the judge a little bit off tilt.
[01:43:35.200 --> 01:43:37.200]  Well, sounds like.
[01:43:37.200 --> 01:43:38.200]  All right, hang on, Mark.
[01:43:38.200 --> 01:43:40.200]  We'll come back to you here in just a second.
[01:43:40.200 --> 01:43:42.200]  We've got a break, all right?
[01:43:42.200 --> 01:43:44.200]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:44.200 --> 01:43:45.200]  Y'all hang in there.
[01:43:45.200 --> 01:43:46.200]  We'll be right back.
[01:43:46.200 --> 01:43:50.200]  We've got one segment left, and I'll try to get to everybody else that's up on there as quick as I can.
[01:43:50.200 --> 01:44:00.200]  So y'all hold on.
[01:44:00.200 --> 01:44:03.200]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:03.200 --> 01:44:04.200]  Sorry.
[01:44:04.200 --> 01:44:07.200]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.200 --> 01:44:08.200]  What?
[01:44:08.200 --> 01:44:12.200]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.200 --> 01:44:16.200]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[01:44:16.200 --> 01:44:19.200]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.200 --> 01:44:25.200]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.200 --> 01:44:30.200]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.200 --> 01:44:36.200]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other poxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.200 --> 01:44:43.200]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.200 --> 01:44:50.200]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.200 --> 01:44:55.200]  or visit them at 1904guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.200 --> 01:44:58.200]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:58.200 --> 01:45:01.200]  and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.200 --> 01:45:04.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.200 --> 01:45:07.200]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.200 --> 01:45:15.200]  the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.200 --> 01:45:19.200]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.200 --> 01:45:23.200]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.200 --> 01:45:28.200]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.200 --> 01:45:34.200]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.200 --> 01:45:39.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.200 --> 01:45:43.200]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.200 --> 01:45:49.200]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.200 --> 01:45:52.200]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.200 --> 01:46:15.200]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:15.200 --> 01:46:28.200]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:28.200 --> 01:46:30.200]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:30.200 --> 01:46:33.200]  We are in our last segment, and we are going to try to wrap up with Mark in Florida here
[01:46:33.200 --> 01:46:35.200]  and move to our next guy.
[01:46:35.200 --> 01:46:38.200]  So what else you got going on with this, Mark?
[01:46:38.200 --> 01:46:40.200]  I'll try to hurry through this.
[01:46:40.200 --> 01:46:45.200]  When I filed that letter, I had three copies, one for each citation.
[01:46:45.200 --> 01:46:49.200]  Now, all three citations are under one case number, and the clerk didn't want to take it.
[01:46:49.200 --> 01:46:57.200]  And I explained to her there's three different citations, and she went ahead and took them.
[01:46:57.200 --> 01:46:59.200]  She didn't file two of them.
[01:46:59.200 --> 01:47:02.200]  They're not on the computer.
[01:47:02.200 --> 01:47:04.200]  She filed one.
[01:47:04.200 --> 01:47:11.200]  Okay, well, that's blocking access to the courts, which that's a violation of due process.
[01:47:11.200 --> 01:47:13.200]  That's criminal.
[01:47:13.200 --> 01:47:18.200]  And in Florida, it may very well be tampering with an official record because the moment you filed it
[01:47:18.200 --> 01:47:21.200]  with that clerk, it became an official document.
[01:47:21.200 --> 01:47:27.200]  And the moment that official document was not put into the official location it's required to be,
[01:47:27.200 --> 01:47:30.200]  she committed a crime.
[01:47:30.200 --> 01:47:36.200]  Now, that's what I thought, and I'm going to pursue that, that when I asked the judge if she received this,
[01:47:36.200 --> 01:47:43.200]  he had it, so did the prosecutor, and the judge converted it to a demand for discovery.
[01:47:43.200 --> 01:47:47.200]  I started to object, but I went ahead and let him do that.
[01:47:47.200 --> 01:47:51.200]  The discovery, of course, didn't answer my five questions.
[01:47:51.200 --> 01:48:01.200]  Well, no, wait a minute. What did you file that they would change it to a motion for discovery?
[01:48:01.200 --> 01:48:04.200]  I just titled it Request for Information and Doc.
[01:48:04.200 --> 01:48:07.200]  Okay, that's one. All right.
[01:48:07.200 --> 01:48:14.200]  Yeah. I don't think she was improper in doing that, really.
[01:48:14.200 --> 01:48:22.200]  Well, the thing about it is if you could have listed all of the citations on the one request,
[01:48:22.200 --> 01:48:29.200]  then there wouldn't be a need for each one being separate if they're all under the same cause number.
[01:48:29.200 --> 01:48:35.200]  They're under the same case number, but, you know, this occurred over two days.
[01:48:35.200 --> 01:48:41.200]  Right. But you still could have said, you could have listed all three citations in one document,
[01:48:41.200 --> 01:48:45.200]  that's what I'm getting at. You didn't have to file a separate document for each one.
[01:48:45.200 --> 01:48:52.200]  Okay. All right. So after she converted it, the prosecutor gave me the...
[01:48:52.200 --> 01:48:58.200]  Well, if the judge directed that everything be condensed into a single filing for the purpose
[01:48:58.200 --> 01:49:04.200]  of seeking the information as it relates to all of those, that they could do.
[01:49:04.200 --> 01:49:13.200]  Okay. All right. Now, she wanted me to enter a plea, and I, you know, brought up the unconscionable plea argument.
[01:49:13.200 --> 01:49:15.200]  And she said, why would it be unconscionable?
[01:49:15.200 --> 01:49:23.200]  And I said, well, I need to answer these questions before I would know whether to plead no contest or take it to trial.
[01:49:23.200 --> 01:49:32.200]  And she entered a plea on my behalf. I objected. She noted it. And she put me down for jury trial.
[01:49:32.200 --> 01:49:37.200]  Does Florida law authorize clerks to take and enter pleas?
[01:49:37.200 --> 01:49:39.200]  This is the judge.
[01:49:39.200 --> 01:49:40.200]  Oh, this is the judge.
[01:49:40.200 --> 01:49:41.200]  This is the judge.
[01:49:41.200 --> 01:49:43.200]  Okay.
[01:49:43.200 --> 01:49:49.200]  This is the judge at my arraignment. And by the way, they saved me, when they did the roll call, you know,
[01:49:49.200 --> 01:49:54.200]  I was in the first half of the people called, they saved me for last.
[01:49:54.200 --> 01:50:00.200]  So I think I've made, and I didn't know this judge, but I made an impression on somebody for them to save me for last.
[01:50:00.200 --> 01:50:03.200]  Probably.
[01:50:03.200 --> 01:50:06.200]  I must be doing something right.
[01:50:06.200 --> 01:50:11.200]  But can she put me down for a jury trial like that?
[01:50:11.200 --> 01:50:15.200]  Well, they can't deny you a jury trial if they're treating it as a criminal case.
[01:50:15.200 --> 01:50:25.200]  If these are civil, well, if they're putting you in for a jury trial, you sure they're not treating these as criminal?
[01:50:25.200 --> 01:50:30.200]  The deputy made me sign the ticket for the expired tags.
[01:50:30.200 --> 01:50:31.200]  Right.
[01:50:31.200 --> 01:50:38.200]  Even though I knew, I know that it is civil. And I started, I signed the other two, you know, the two misdemeanors,
[01:50:38.200 --> 01:50:43.200]  and I started to refuse to sign the other one so he'd take me to jail for the civil charge.
[01:50:43.200 --> 01:50:53.200]  I think I screwed up there, not doing that. But so far, they've got them all up together, you know, in criminal court.
[01:50:53.200 --> 01:51:01.200]  Well, then you may be able to challenge the jurisdiction on the civil one if that court is criminal only. But you'll have to see.
[01:51:01.200 --> 01:51:08.200]  Now, it took them quite a while. You know, they had to transfer the case to the main courthouse downtown
[01:51:08.200 --> 01:51:18.200]  because they don't do jury trials on the satellite courthouse. And they scheduled this more than 90 days from the arrest.
[01:51:18.200 --> 01:51:24.200]  And the speedy trial, Florida speedy trial is 90 days for misdemeanors.
[01:51:24.200 --> 01:51:31.200]  So should I make any waves over this or should I just let everything ride?
[01:51:31.200 --> 01:51:37.200]  If it violates the rules of procedure or your rights, you do not let it ride.
[01:51:37.200 --> 01:51:42.200]  You file an objection to it in writing and you challenge it as such.
[01:51:42.200 --> 01:51:47.200]  I was going to wait and file a motion to dismiss about 91 or 92 days.
[01:51:47.200 --> 01:51:53.200]  Well, the problem is, is if you wait, you may waive.
[01:51:53.200 --> 01:52:00.200]  Well, it says in the rules of criminal procedures that if you file early, it's null.
[01:52:00.200 --> 01:52:11.200]  No, it is null if you file before it happens. But once it has happened, then you're not filing early.
[01:52:11.200 --> 01:52:15.200]  You're filing to preserve, are you not?
[01:52:15.200 --> 01:52:18.200]  You're saying after the 90 days?
[01:52:18.200 --> 01:52:29.200]  No. If they commit a violation of due process or your rights, you have to object to that, both when it's happening and in writing.
[01:52:29.200 --> 01:52:37.200]  Now, if you object to something before it has happened, then it would be null.
[01:52:37.200 --> 01:52:43.200]  You need to read that again and see under what set of circumstances that applies.
[01:52:43.200 --> 01:52:49.200]  Now, I've read it carefully in all the little subsections it refers to.
[01:52:49.200 --> 01:52:59.200]  I've read them all and there it says that the defendant may file a notice for violation of speedy trial.
[01:52:59.200 --> 01:53:06.200]  And at that point, they have to do something within five days and then they have to schedule a court within 10 days.
[01:53:06.200 --> 01:53:12.200]  Well, I don't want that. I just want to dismiss for violating the speedy trial rule.
[01:53:12.200 --> 01:53:22.200]  So I was going to wait until 91 days and file a most due dismiss, you know, lack of speedy trial.
[01:53:22.200 --> 01:53:28.200]  Am I wrong by doing that?
[01:53:28.200 --> 01:53:35.200]  No, not if you've got something in your favor that would show that that length of time is a violation of speedy trial.
[01:53:35.200 --> 01:53:38.200]  Okay.
[01:53:38.200 --> 01:53:45.200]  But you can't cite it just to say it. You've got to have something to prove that that's the way it would work.
[01:53:45.200 --> 01:53:49.200]  There's got to be a case opinion. There's got to be a statute.
[01:53:49.200 --> 01:53:55.200]  There's got to be something that would support that it's in violation of speedy trial.
[01:53:55.200 --> 01:53:59.200]  Okay. You're saying besides the rules of criminal procedure.
[01:53:59.200 --> 01:54:08.200]  No, that's a statute. If you've got rules of criminal procedure that says that that's what it is, then you're fine.
[01:54:08.200 --> 01:54:12.200]  Okay. All right. That should be all good then.
[01:54:12.200 --> 01:54:13.200]  Okay.
[01:54:13.200 --> 01:54:21.200]  Let me look at my notes real quick. I think I've covered everything.
[01:54:21.200 --> 01:54:29.200]  Oh, the only other question was she entered that plea and I objected, and I know she can't do that.
[01:54:29.200 --> 01:54:35.200]  The judge can't do that, you know, because I didn't refuse to enter a plea. I explained that in my objection.
[01:54:35.200 --> 01:54:38.200]  Right. And you also need to file a motion to disqualify.
[01:54:38.200 --> 01:54:47.200]  The judge has no power to waive your rights for you if they haven't met the requirements of due process prior to that,
[01:54:47.200 --> 01:54:51.200]  such as proper notice of the nature and cause.
[01:54:51.200 --> 01:54:58.200]  If they haven't given you that and they're demanding a plea anyway, that's a violation of due process.
[01:54:58.200 --> 01:55:03.200]  And by entering that plea, that waives particular rights that you don't want waived.
[01:55:03.200 --> 01:55:08.200]  And you have a right to demand they not be waived.
[01:55:08.200 --> 01:55:16.200]  And can she sign me up for a jury trial at the same time?
[01:55:16.200 --> 01:55:24.200]  Well, if the rules of procedure allow them to do so, they can't presume that you don't get a jury trial if they're charging you criminally.
[01:55:24.200 --> 01:55:27.200]  They have to presume that all of your rights are supposed to be protected,
[01:55:27.200 --> 01:55:34.200]  except for the ones that they waived when they entered that plea for you unconsciously.
[01:55:34.200 --> 01:55:37.200]  See, they only care if the obvious rights get violated.
[01:55:37.200 --> 01:55:45.200]  The more subtle ones that still commit a harm, they just sweep under the rug wherever they can unless you call them on it.
[01:55:45.200 --> 01:55:48.200]  Yeah. Okay.
[01:55:48.200 --> 01:55:52.200]  And I just forgot the other question, but that's no big deal.
[01:55:52.200 --> 01:55:53.200]  Okay.
[01:55:53.200 --> 01:55:55.200]  All right. Thanks a lot, Eddie.
[01:55:55.200 --> 01:55:56.200]  You're welcome.
[01:55:56.200 --> 01:55:59.200]  Keep yourself protected, brother.
[01:55:59.200 --> 01:56:04.200]  I'll do what I can. But hiding out just ain't never been my thing.
[01:56:04.200 --> 01:56:08.200]  No, I didn't say hi. Never hid.
[01:56:08.200 --> 01:56:11.200]  All right. Well, thanks for calling in, Mark.
[01:56:11.200 --> 01:56:13.200]  Have a happy Christmas.
[01:56:13.200 --> 01:56:14.200]  You too. Bye-bye.
[01:56:14.200 --> 01:56:19.200]  All right. Now I'm going to go to Mike in D.C. Mike, what do you got?
[01:56:19.200 --> 01:56:21.200]  Hey, Eddie. How you doing today, sir?
[01:56:21.200 --> 01:56:25.200]  I'm doing good, but we're short on time, so let's roll.
[01:56:25.200 --> 01:56:35.200]  All right. Real short. I'm new to your forum, new to this information, and I just got hit with a red light letter.
[01:56:35.200 --> 01:56:46.200]  So I was searching on the Internet and came across your information. Hold on one second.
[01:56:46.200 --> 01:56:53.200]  And it came across the information, so I printed it out, read through the letter, sealed it out,
[01:56:53.200 --> 01:57:01.200]  swapped out my information, and I recently sent it back on the citation that was given to me.
[01:57:01.200 --> 01:57:07.200]  It was in PG County. I wrote, I do not consent, and I sent it back with the letter.
[01:57:07.200 --> 01:57:10.200]  Okay. Is that in D.C. or is that outside of D.C.?
[01:57:10.200 --> 01:57:14.200]  It's outside of D.C. Prince Joseph's County is actually in Maryland.
[01:57:14.200 --> 01:57:15.200]  Right. Okay.
[01:57:15.200 --> 01:57:16.200]  It's on the border.
[01:57:16.200 --> 01:57:18.200]  All right. So the citation is from Maryland.
[01:57:18.200 --> 01:57:23.200]  How much research have you done on the Maryland statutes relating to red light camera citations?
[01:57:23.200 --> 01:57:26.200]  None, actually.
[01:57:26.200 --> 01:57:33.200]  Well, you need to. You start always with the law that allegedly makes it possible for them to do what they're doing.
[01:57:33.200 --> 01:57:35.200]  They do the same thing here in Texas.
[01:57:35.200 --> 01:57:42.200]  The problem is there is no authority in the statute whatsoever for them to issue citations for red light camera tickets here in Texas.
[01:57:42.200 --> 01:57:47.200]  You need to determine what the requirements are there in Maryland for those tickets.
[01:57:47.200 --> 01:57:52.200]  The other thing is, is does the ticket show a photo of who's behind the wheel?
[01:57:52.200 --> 01:57:55.200]  No, I just showed this photo of my back bumper and my back bumper.
[01:57:55.200 --> 01:58:03.200]  Okay. Then what they're attempting to do is the same thing they're doing here, which is create guilt by ownership, which also is invalid.
[01:58:03.200 --> 01:58:05.200]  They can't do that.
[01:58:05.200 --> 01:58:10.200]  They have to be able to prove it was you in order for you to have any liability.
[01:58:10.200 --> 01:58:14.200]  So the letter should be fine, but you need to be studying.
[01:58:14.200 --> 01:58:18.200]  Find the statutes. Apply the statutes. Okay?
[01:58:18.200 --> 01:58:20.200]  Where would I find the statutes?
[01:58:20.200 --> 01:58:27.200]  I do not know where you're going to find them, but you're going to have to look in whatever the codes are for motor vehicles and red light camera citations in Maryland.
[01:58:27.200 --> 01:58:30.200]  Okay? I'm sorry, ma'am, but I'm out of time.
[01:58:30.200 --> 01:58:33.200]  All right, folks, I'm sorry for the rest of the callers.
[01:58:33.200 --> 01:58:36.200]  I don't have time to get to you tonight, and I apologize.
[01:58:36.200 --> 01:58:39.200]  Thanks for listening and thanks for calling in.
[01:58:39.200 --> 01:58:42.200]  We appreciate you. Please keep us in your financial blessings and prayers.
[01:58:42.200 --> 01:58:45.200]  Y'all have a great week. Good night. God bless.
[01:58:45.200 --> 01:58:48.200]  Keep donating to me because I need money for that lawsuit.
[01:58:48.200 --> 01:58:50.200]  See you later.
[01:59:19.200 --> 01:59:30.200]  This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.200 --> 01:59:32.200]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.200 --> 01:59:40.200]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.200 --> 01:59:49.200]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.200 --> 01:59:54.200]  Looking for some truth? You found it.
[01:59:54.200 --> 02:00:10.200]  LogosradioNetwork.com