[00:00.000 --> 00:05.960]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily
[00:05.960 --> 00:13.560]  bulletins for the commodities market, Today in History, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.560 --> 00:21.360]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.360 --> 00:27.640]  Markets for the 7th of December, 2015, opened up with gold at $1,084.81 an ounce, silver
[00:27.640 --> 00:34.760]  at $14.55 an ounce, Texas crude at $39.97 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting
[00:34.760 --> 00:43.840]  at about $387 U.S. currency.
[00:43.840 --> 00:52.040]  Today in History, Sunday, December 7, 1941, a date which will live in infamy, as then
[00:52.040 --> 00:55.720]  President Franklin D. Roosevelt stated in his address to the nation about the Imperial
[00:55.720 --> 01:00.560]  Japanese Navy attack consisting of roughly 353 planes on the U.S. fleet at the Pearl
[01:00.560 --> 01:03.460]  Harbor Navy base, which killed over 2,400 people.
[01:03.460 --> 01:08.180]  Many like retired U.S. Navy Rear Admiral Robert A. Theobald whistled conspiracy by various
[01:08.180 --> 01:12.980]  parties behind the U.S. and British governments and militaries who knew of the attack in advance
[01:12.980 --> 01:16.920]  and may have let them take place and or even encouraged them in order to convince the American
[01:16.920 --> 01:24.380]  populace of the urgent need of getting into World War II.
[01:24.380 --> 01:28.160]  In recent news, according to the Air Force, the U.S. has fired more than 20,000 missiles
[01:28.160 --> 01:32.840]  and bombs against ISIS since the U.S. bombing campaign against them began about 15 months
[01:32.840 --> 01:33.840]  ago.
[01:33.840 --> 01:36.960]  Air Force Chief of Staff General Mark Welch said in a statement that the Air Force is
[01:36.960 --> 01:39.760]  now expending munitions faster than we can replenish them.
[01:39.760 --> 01:43.360]  He and the department are calling to ramp up funding for Hellfire missiles and weapons
[01:43.360 --> 01:44.620]  production as a whole.
[01:44.620 --> 01:48.900]  He went on to state that the precision today's war requires demands the right equipment and
[01:48.900 --> 01:51.200]  capability to achieve desired effects.
[01:51.200 --> 01:55.800]  We need to ensure that necessary funding is in place to not only execute today's wars
[01:55.800 --> 01:57.680]  but also tomorrow's challenges.
[01:57.680 --> 02:02.040]  Here at the lowdown, we can't help but suspect this to be a munitions overkill for the lining
[02:02.040 --> 02:04.800]  of the pockets of the military industrial complex.
[02:04.800 --> 02:09.600]  Seriously, are multi-million dollar payloads really the way to meet the challenges of fleets
[02:09.600 --> 02:19.000]  of Toyota Tacomas, stockpiles of AK-47s, munitions and adobe compounds?
[02:19.000 --> 02:22.680]  A U.S. appeals court is set to rule on the legality of the new Federal Communications
[02:22.680 --> 02:24.400]  Commission's net neutrality rules.
[02:24.400 --> 02:28.440]  A three-judge panel questioned lawyers from the FCC and lawyers from the broadband companies.
[02:28.440 --> 02:33.080]  They are set to rule in regards to whether or not the FCC had the authority to reclassify
[02:33.080 --> 02:37.320]  the Internet as a telecommunications service instead of an information service.
[02:37.320 --> 02:41.160]  Lawyers for the Internet service providers arguing that because they flex some control
[02:41.160 --> 02:45.680]  over pages that they then met the qualifications for an information service provider.
[02:45.680 --> 02:49.760]  While the FCC counter-argued that the broadband providers were simply transporting data and
[02:49.760 --> 02:52.000]  not necessarily making content decisions.
[02:52.000 --> 03:16.920]  This has been your Lowdown for December 7th, 2013.
[03:16.920 --> 03:36.880]  Thank you.
[03:36.880 --> 03:46.880]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day son, a man had to answer for the ways that he'd done.
[03:46.880 --> 03:52.880]  He'd pick all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them bad boys,
[03:52.880 --> 04:00.880]  hang them high up the street, for all the people to see.
[04:00.880 --> 04:08.880]  That justice is one thing you should always find, you've got to settle up before you've got to draw a hard line.
[04:08.880 --> 04:16.880]  When the guns won't settle we'll sing a victory tune and we'll haul me back at the local zoo.
[04:16.880 --> 04:34.880]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing, let's get for my men before my horses.
[04:34.880 --> 04:43.880]  Alright folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show. It is December 7th, 2015.
[04:43.880 --> 04:50.880]  Alright, I want to touch a little bit on what we went over in class yesterday for the benefit of all of you that are listening.
[04:50.880 --> 04:59.880]  And as you all know, when you're reading these laws, codes, and statutes, there are things that you need to understand
[04:59.880 --> 05:09.880]  which too many people do not, and the powers that be, especially attorneys, hope that you do not make the effort to find out.
[05:09.880 --> 05:24.880]  Because what you would prove by learning this is that you could get the same $100,000 education that attorney got for $5 in late fees at your local library.
[05:24.880 --> 05:41.880]  Because if you follow some very simple reading and research information to an understanding of how the courts themselves are supposed to analyze and apply the law,
[05:41.880 --> 05:51.880]  you will understand how the system works better than most of those that operate within it for the purpose of enriching themselves at your expense.
[05:51.880 --> 06:01.880]  Now that being said, the Sunday classes, we have done a live stream this past Sunday yesterday,
[06:01.880 --> 06:10.880]  and it seems to have worked out fine provided that you have an Internet connection capable of streaming the video and staying connected without interruption.
[06:10.880 --> 06:14.880]  I don't know how well satellite or wireless is going to work for you, if that's all you've got.
[06:14.880 --> 06:21.880]  But if you want to give it a shot, you can go and get all the information and find the link as necessary.
[06:21.880 --> 06:28.880]  I will try to be sure as soon as I've got the information to do a post on the Facebook page for it as a scheduled event.
[06:28.880 --> 06:44.880]  But if you don't see it there, go to the bookstore website, which is bravenewbookstore.com, and then click on the Brave TV button or icon or title or whatever it is on there.
[06:44.880 --> 06:50.880]  And that will take you into where you can purchase the stream as if you're attending the class.
[06:50.880 --> 06:58.880]  Now the one thing we do not have for remote viewers at this time is the ability to interact.
[06:58.880 --> 07:10.880]  You can watch and you can hear, but you can't ask questions because we don't have a moderator and a means for everyone to be communicating with us during the class.
[07:10.880 --> 07:13.880]  I've got to figure out the logistics on how to make that work.
[07:13.880 --> 07:28.880]  But keep apprised of where we are with any of that by going to the bookstore website, to that link, bravenewbookstore.com, and clicking on Brave TV and reading or whatever it is John sets up for it there.
[07:28.880 --> 07:40.880]  I'm also going to try to get to where we can put a link for it up on the logos and rule of law radio websites so that you can get the information for there or that we can at least make a window of it over
[07:40.880 --> 07:47.880]  or a link over to the Brave New Bookstore link so that all the information is in sync and accurate.
[07:47.880 --> 07:48.880]  All right.
[07:48.880 --> 07:53.880]  That being said, let's get into a little bit about these rules I was talking about and some understanding.
[07:53.880 --> 08:03.880]  The title for tonight's show, and I'm going to start trying to do that from now on, is if I have a particular subject that I'm going to deal with on the show,
[08:03.880 --> 08:12.880]  I am going to state that toward the beginning of the show so we will know what the archive later was intended to deal with.
[08:12.880 --> 08:20.880]  Now, we make it into a lot more than that, but for the beginning basis of the show, this is what this is going to be for this week.
[08:20.880 --> 08:23.880]  And this week it is legal reasoning.
[08:23.880 --> 08:24.880]  Okay?
[08:24.880 --> 08:31.880]  Now, what I'm going to do is I'm going to read you a little bit out of a book called Making Your Case, The Art of Persuading Judges.
[08:31.880 --> 08:36.880]  It's co-written by Antonian Scalia and Brian A. Garner.
[08:36.880 --> 08:39.880]  Now, as you know, Scalia is a Supreme Court justice.
[08:39.880 --> 08:50.880]  He is what he likes to refer to himself as an originalist or a constitutionalist where he tries to apply original meaning of the Constitution to its context.
[08:50.880 --> 08:57.880]  But when you read some of his opinions, you know he does not adhere to that when it suits him.
[08:57.880 --> 08:59.880]  None of them do.
[08:59.880 --> 09:02.880]  So take these rules tongue in cheek.
[09:02.880 --> 09:09.880]  These are the rules they will tell you to their face that they use and that are a must to apply to your argument.
[09:09.880 --> 09:13.880]  But don't bank on them following their own rules.
[09:13.880 --> 09:14.880]  Okay?
[09:14.880 --> 09:19.880]  So let me read you a little bit of this here so you'll understand how this works.
[09:19.880 --> 09:38.880]  Legal argument generally has three sources of major premises, a text, meaning a Constitution, statute, regulation, ordinance, or contract, precedent, meaning case law, et cetera, and policy, i.e., the consequences of the decision.
[09:38.880 --> 09:45.880]  Often the major premise is self-evident and acknowledged by both sides.
[09:45.880 --> 09:50.880]  The minor premise, meanwhile, is derived from the facts of the case.
[09:50.880 --> 09:59.880]  There is much to be said for the proposition that legal reasoning revolves mainly around the establishment of the minor premise.
[09:59.880 --> 10:05.880]  So if you're arguing from precedent, your argument might go something like this.
[10:05.880 --> 10:15.880]  The statement of major premise, our case is established that a prisoner has a claim for harm caused by the state's deliberate indifference to serious medical conditions.
[10:15.880 --> 10:26.880]  Minor premise, guards at the Anderson unit ignored the plaintiff's complaints of acute abdominal pain for 48 hours, whereupon his appendix burst.
[10:26.880 --> 10:32.880]  The plaintiff prisoner, our conclusion, the plaintiff prisoner has a claim.
[10:32.880 --> 10:47.880]  Or if you're arguing text, it might be, major premise, under the Indian Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, states cannot tax Indian tribes for activities on reservations without the express authorization of Congress.
[10:47.880 --> 10:57.880]  Minor premise, without congressional authorization, South Dakota has imposed its motor fuel tax on tribes that sell fuel on reservations.
[10:57.880 --> 11:03.880]  In conclusion, South Dakota's tax is unconstitutional.
[11:03.880 --> 11:16.880]  Or if you're arguing policy, the premise, the major premise might be, only an interpretation that benefits the handicapped serves the policy objectives of the statute.
[11:16.880 --> 11:28.880]  Minor premise, the defendants interpretation of the statute requires each wheelchair-bound employee to buy additional equipment at a cost of $1,800.
[11:28.880 --> 11:36.880]  Conclusion, the defendants interpretation does not serve the policy objectives of the statute.
[11:36.880 --> 11:53.880]  Now that last one there, arguing policy, pay attention to how that one worked because we're going to apply that in arguing transportation or any other code-regulable activity.
[11:53.880 --> 12:04.880]  All right, because that's what a code is. A code is the statutory policy for that regulable activity.
[12:04.880 --> 12:13.880]  Whatever the subject is that that code regulates, that's the policy, okay?
[12:13.880 --> 12:15.880]  So that's what we're going to be looking at here in a little bit.
[12:15.880 --> 12:17.880]  But right now, let me read a little more of this.
[12:17.880 --> 12:27.880]  Figuring out the contents of a legal syllogism is a matter of finding a rule that works together with the facts of the case, really a rule that is invoked by those facts.
[12:27.880 --> 12:33.880]  Typically adversaries will be angling for different rules by emphasizing different facts.
[12:33.880 --> 12:40.880]  The victor will be the one who convinces decision-makers that his or her syllogism is closer to the case's center of gravity.
[12:40.880 --> 12:48.880]  What is the legal problem mostly about? Your task as an advocate is to answer that question convincingly.
[12:48.880 --> 12:54.880]  Now those of you that heard this, what is the legal problem mostly about, if you've ever served in the military,
[12:54.880 --> 13:03.880]  then you will recognize this or any government job for that matter, especially when it came to seeking promotion.
[13:03.880 --> 13:16.880]  Every time they give you a test, the test has questions on it where the answers are found to be the ones that are the most correct.
[13:16.880 --> 13:32.880]  Not necessarily correct, okay, in other words, every answer on the test might be wrong, but you have to find the one that is the closest to being right.
[13:32.880 --> 13:44.880]  Another way of saying that exact same thing is find the answer that is the least incorrect way to do or solve this problem.
[13:44.880 --> 13:53.880]  That is government thinking for you people, but that is what they're telling you here when you argue your legal case.
[13:53.880 --> 14:03.880]  Which one is closest to the mark? Not necessarily correct or even constitutional, moral, or legal,
[14:03.880 --> 14:13.880]  but which one is closer to the center of the gravity of the argument that you want us to buy? Keep that in mind.
[14:13.880 --> 14:22.880]  Now when it comes to statutes, regulations, ordinances, contracts, and the like, you need to know the rules of statutory interpretation.
[14:22.880 --> 14:33.880]  And this book lays those out this way. Paramount Rule, and for those of you that have listened to this show more than twice,
[14:33.880 --> 14:48.880]  you know this is first and foremost my mandate to any person that calls into this show to ask me a question about what are they going to do about this, that, or the other situation that they have.
[14:48.880 --> 15:00.880]  And if you've listened, you'll know the first thing I ask them is what have you read? And almost always the answer is nothing.
[15:00.880 --> 15:06.880]  So almost always my answer will be, then I can't help you.
[15:06.880 --> 15:18.880]  Because until you read and know exactly what is going on, how do you expect me to provide you with any information of any kind that could even be conceived as effective?
[15:18.880 --> 15:26.880]  You're asking me to solve a problem completely blind, deaf, and dumb. And I can't do that.
[15:26.880 --> 15:31.880]  Neither can you.
[15:31.880 --> 15:48.880]  Now, that being said, let's read some of this. Again, the Paramount Rule, before coming to any conclusion about the meaning of a text, read the entire document, not just the particular provision at issue.
[15:48.880 --> 15:57.880]  Now, why is this important, ladies and gentlemen? It's important because this is exactly how a city attorney, a county attorney, a district attorney apply the law.
[15:57.880 --> 16:00.880]  This is how they argue their case.
[16:00.880 --> 16:19.880]  They cherry pick statutes and ignore everything around it and the subject to which the statute applies in order to make their case appear lawful, reasonable, and viable.
[16:19.880 --> 16:32.880]  You want to know why we go into the issue of not engaged in transportation in relation to any alleged transportation offense.
[16:32.880 --> 16:47.880]  Well, when I get done reading all of these, I'm going to tell you directly why and show you an example right in the bill that created the transportation code as to why we have to do that.
[16:47.880 --> 16:59.880]  All right, folks, y'all hang in there, and we will be right back after this break. This is Rule of Law Radio. Y'all hold on.
[16:59.880 --> 17:05.880]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:05.880 --> 17:10.880]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:10.880 --> 17:17.880]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.880 --> 17:25.880]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.880 --> 17:31.880]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:31.880 --> 17:39.880]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.880 --> 17:47.880]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:47.880 --> 17:51.880]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.880 --> 17:58.880]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:58.880 --> 18:00.880]  Order now.
[18:00.880 --> 18:05.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.880 --> 18:09.880]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:09.880 --> 18:14.880]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:14.880 --> 18:20.880]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:20.880 --> 18:26.880]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:26.880 --> 18:33.880]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.880 --> 18:38.880]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.880 --> 18:40.880]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.880 --> 18:49.880]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.880 --> 19:00.880]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.880 --> 19:10.880]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:10.880 --> 19:33.880]  Look what we got, we asked the Christians, they don't know what I did, they don't have the answers, they don't know what I did,
[19:33.880 --> 19:45.880]  we asked the Christians, look what we got, they don't have the answers, they don't know what I did,
[19:45.880 --> 19:50.880]  Alright folks, we are back, this is RuleOfLawRadio.
[19:50.880 --> 19:54.880]  Alright, now, let me continue on here with this.
[19:54.880 --> 20:02.880]  The court will be seeking to give an ambiguous word or phrase meaning in the context of the document in which it appears.
[20:02.880 --> 20:08.880]  Often a later provision will reveal that the earlier provision must bear a particular meaning.
[20:08.880 --> 20:13.880]  Here are the frequently expressed rules of interpretation.
[20:13.880 --> 20:18.880]  Words are presumed to bear their ordinary meanings.
[20:18.880 --> 20:22.880]  Now y'all have heard me talk about this one before, pay close attention to this.
[20:22.880 --> 20:29.880]  The courts tell you that words shall be presumed to have their ordinary meanings.
[20:29.880 --> 20:36.880]  Well that may be true as far as a presumption goes, but here's the problem.
[20:36.880 --> 20:51.880]  When a word is defined by statute, by other law, by legal use, or by specialized industry use,
[20:51.880 --> 21:01.880]  those terms, definitions, and applications take precedent over the common ordinary meaning.
[21:01.880 --> 21:07.880]  Hence the reason I have told you time and time again there is a legal hierarchy
[21:07.880 --> 21:14.880]  to the determination of what a term or phrase means in relation to a statute.
[21:14.880 --> 21:21.880]  If the underlying law or the statute creates a definition for a term or phrase,
[21:21.880 --> 21:29.880]  that is the controlling meaning for that term or phrase, not its common meaning.
[21:29.880 --> 21:34.880]  In fact, if it is defined by statute or underlying law,
[21:34.880 --> 21:42.880]  it can never ever be the same meaning as what is in the common usage.
[21:42.880 --> 21:51.880]  It is limited 100% to what the meaning is set in statute or law as.
[21:51.880 --> 21:58.880]  It cannot be deviated from that, regardless of what it says in the common dictionary.
[21:58.880 --> 22:06.880]  Number two, if the statute or the underlying law for the statute does not define the term,
[22:06.880 --> 22:15.880]  then we have to ascertain whether or not the law itself, i.e. opinion of the courts
[22:15.880 --> 22:20.880]  or the industry to which the term or phrase relates,
[22:20.880 --> 22:26.880]  has itself created a specialized definition for the term or phrase.
[22:26.880 --> 22:31.880]  And if it has, and the statute and underlying law have not,
[22:31.880 --> 22:42.880]  then that term or phrase definition is still taking precedent over the common English meaning.
[22:42.880 --> 22:49.880]  Only if there is no meaning defined in statute or that underlying law the statute is based upon
[22:49.880 --> 22:55.880]  or upon the legal definitions in the industry governing law
[22:55.880 --> 23:01.880]  or in the actual technical industry to which the term or phrase applies,
[23:01.880 --> 23:09.880]  has not provided a definition then and only then do we go to the actual common meaning.
[23:09.880 --> 23:15.880]  But what they're telling you here is that the courts will default to that meaning
[23:15.880 --> 23:24.880]  unless one of the parties raises the issue that one of these other areas has a meaning already assigned.
[23:24.880 --> 23:30.880]  So once they say they're going to do that, that's the part you need to understand.
[23:30.880 --> 23:34.880]  I understand the court usually takes the common meaning of a term or phrase.
[23:34.880 --> 23:39.880]  However, the statute and section blah blah blah gives a definition for this particular term or phrase,
[23:39.880 --> 23:42.880]  and therefore that is controlling in the application and purpose of this argument,
[23:42.880 --> 23:46.880]  as well as the application of the statute as a whole in the case.
[23:46.880 --> 23:48.880]  So we go with that.
[23:48.880 --> 23:51.880]  The court's got no choice. The judge has no choice.
[23:51.880 --> 23:59.880]  The difference there is, is these lower court judges and these city and county and district attorneys
[23:59.880 --> 24:10.880]  that haven't even gotten wet behind the ears past law school are freaking clueless about how that works.
[24:10.880 --> 24:16.880]  Now see, I haven't spent $100,000 on a legal education, and I know this.
[24:16.880 --> 24:23.880]  But these people that have been out of law school for two years and are in debt up to their hairline don't.
[24:23.880 --> 24:29.880]  And I currently don't even have late fees at a library. Thank you very much.
[24:29.880 --> 24:33.880]  So the point is, this is not impossible for anyone to learn.
[24:33.880 --> 24:36.880]  It just takes a little effort to learn.
[24:36.880 --> 24:41.880]  I mean, even in law school they have to put in effort. They still may come out stupid.
[24:41.880 --> 24:48.880]  Look at Sheila Jackson Lee and Hank Thompson for, or I'm sorry, Hank Johnson for goodness sake.
[24:48.880 --> 24:54.880]  Those people are dumber than a box of lint, okay?
[24:54.880 --> 25:01.880]  And they're congresspersons. Heaven help us all.
[25:01.880 --> 25:06.880]  But anyway, that's what they mean when they say words are presumed to bear their ordinary meaning.
[25:06.880 --> 25:13.880]  You may be defaulting to that, but it is your job to point out that the ordinary meaning does not apply here.
[25:13.880 --> 25:18.880]  Okay? And that, ladies and gentlemen, is where we're going to apply it to the term transportation.
[25:18.880 --> 25:26.880]  Remember I told you, the statutes of Texas, no code, no underlying law has ever defined the term transportation.
[25:26.880 --> 25:37.880]  However, the law through case opinion and the industry to which it relates, i.e. commercial use of the highways
[25:37.880 --> 25:45.880]  for private profit again through the movement of persons, goods, or passengers from point A to point B for compensation or higher,
[25:45.880 --> 25:54.880]  those have created a specialized definition for that term.
[25:54.880 --> 26:04.880]  And that's what these lower courts and the appellate courts above them either A, are too stupid to realize and apply,
[26:04.880 --> 26:13.880]  or B, knowingly and intentionally subvert the issue by ignoring it and burying it through an argument over the police powers,
[26:13.880 --> 26:22.880]  which is completely inapplicable to the facts of the case that they're supposed to be reviewing.
[26:22.880 --> 26:30.880]  The police power has nothing to do with it, because it has nothing to do with public safety
[26:30.880 --> 26:39.880]  in relation to the general public applying for and receiving their stupid license. None.
[26:39.880 --> 26:45.880]  Proof of that is in seeing how you accomplish getting that license.
[26:45.880 --> 26:50.880]  You go down, you put your name and information on a sheet of paper.
[26:50.880 --> 26:58.880]  You file it. You come back, you take a driving test, physical control of a car, and you take a written test, okay?
[26:58.880 --> 27:06.880]  Answer questions on paper. You do not spend one minute training, or you're not required to anyway,
[27:06.880 --> 27:14.880]  in any way, shape, or form to take either of those tests. You can take them just because you want to.
[27:14.880 --> 27:24.880]  And if you pass them, you are now qualified to get the license, whether you have spent one second ever behind the wheel of a car or not.
[27:24.880 --> 27:35.880]  But who does that method not apply to? To the very people that are going to use the roads for commercial purposes.
[27:35.880 --> 27:44.880]  Truck drivers have to attend truck driving school. They have to be certified before they can get the license.
[27:44.880 --> 27:48.880]  Same thing with school bus drivers. Same thing with taxi drivers.
[27:48.880 --> 27:55.880]  Same thing with any of these people that are getting a commercial grade license, okay?
[27:55.880 --> 28:01.880]  Now, don't get me wrong. They're all commercial licenses, every last one of them.
[28:01.880 --> 28:15.880]  But they try to make it appear as if the same standard is set under the police power, i.e., it's a public safety issue across the board for everyone.
[28:15.880 --> 28:22.880]  And that is a bald-faced lie. It isn't.
[28:22.880 --> 28:37.880]  So transportation, having a special legal and industry-related definition, cannot be taken from its common definition out of a regular dictionary.
[28:37.880 --> 28:44.880]  We have to get it out of a legal dictionary and an industry terminology dictionary if there is one.
[28:44.880 --> 28:52.880]  But since the law takes precedent over the industry, the legal dictionary would be where we'd have to stop first.
[28:52.880 --> 28:57.880]  And it's in there. And it is everything I have said it is.
[28:57.880 --> 29:03.880]  The movement of persons, goods, or property by a carrier. What's a carrier? Same sort of thing.
[29:03.880 --> 29:11.880]  Where does the definition come from? Well, if it's not defined in the statute of the underlying law, is it defined by legal opinion and or the industry itself?
[29:11.880 --> 29:14.880]  Yes, it is. Here it is. There we go.
[29:14.880 --> 29:26.880]  It is a person who is engaged in the business of transporting persons, goods, or property from point A to point B for compensation or hire.
[29:26.880 --> 29:31.880]  It's commercial. It has always been commercial.
[29:31.880 --> 29:44.880]  I'm going to finish these rules, and then I'm going to show you how this actually applies under the original enactment of the 1995 bill, SB 971, that created the transportation code as we know it today,
[29:44.880 --> 29:54.880]  and as it is illegally and unlawfully applied to everyone within the territorial borders of Texas, unconstitutional.
[29:54.880 --> 30:01.880]  We'll be right back after this break. Y'all hang on.
[30:01.880 --> 30:05.880]  Sorry, soft drink lovers. Even diet drinks can make you fat.
[30:05.880 --> 30:10.880]  A new study shows that diet soda drinkers gain much more weight than people who avoid the stuff.
[30:10.880 --> 30:16.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with a scoop on supposedly skinny sodas.
[30:16.880 --> 30:21.880]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.880 --> 30:26.880]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:26.880 --> 30:31.880]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.880 --> 30:34.880]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:34.880 --> 30:41.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.880 --> 30:45.880]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.880 --> 30:50.880]  Artificial sweeteners cut the calories and help you lose weight, right? Wrong.
[30:50.880 --> 30:55.880]  Researchers at UT San Antonio followed hundreds of diet soda drinkers for nearly a decade.
[30:55.880 --> 31:02.880]  They found that regularly drinking diet soda expanded people's waistlines five times more than no soda at all.
[31:02.880 --> 31:09.880]  The study's authors say artificial sweeteners trigger the appetite, but unlike regular sugars, don't deliver anything to squelch it.
[31:09.880 --> 31:15.880]  Waking up hunger without satisfying it leads to cravings, which can result in a larger overall calorie intake.
[31:15.880 --> 31:23.880]  So use natural sweeteners to maintain a healthy weight, and if you need to shed some pounds, avoid the sweet stuff altogether and drink water instead.
[31:23.880 --> 31:29.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:29.880 --> 31:37.880]  What are you thinking? Microplant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month.
[31:37.880 --> 31:47.880]  FUSA.org has 12 formulations of microplant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever.
[31:47.880 --> 31:54.880]  It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products, that saves you space, time, and money.
[31:54.880 --> 32:00.880]  Call 888-910-4367 only at FUSA.org.
[32:00.880 --> 32:11.880]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:11.880 --> 32:18.880]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:18.880 --> 32:24.880]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:24.880 --> 32:34.880]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:34.880 --> 32:39.880]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:39.880 --> 32:49.880]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:49.880 --> 32:58.880]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:58.880 --> 33:10.880]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:10.880 --> 33:26.880]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I gonna solve them, to the help of government them, prosecute them. Okay.
[33:26.880 --> 33:41.880]  Oh, sir.
[33:41.880 --> 33:59.880]  All right, folks.
[33:59.880 --> 34:06.880]  Now, let me continue on with this before I rant anymore. I'm gonna try to get through this so that we can understand how this all works together.
[34:06.880 --> 34:22.880]  All right, after words are presumed to bear their ordinary meanings, the next express rule of interpretation is, without some contrary indication, a word or phrase is presumed to have the same meaning throughout a document.
[34:22.880 --> 34:31.880]  The next rule, the provisions of a document should be interpreted in a way that renders them harmonious, not contradictory.
[34:31.880 --> 34:43.880]  The next rule, if possible, no interpretation should be adopted that renders the provision in question or any other provision, superfluous, unlawful, or invalid.
[34:43.880 --> 34:50.880]  If possible, every word should be given effect. No words should be read as surplussage.
[34:50.880 --> 34:58.880]  Legislative provisions should be interpreted in a way that avoids placing their constitutionality in doubt.
[34:58.880 --> 35:11.880]  A federal statute should not be read to eliminate state sovereign immunity or to preempt state law in an area of traditional state action unless that disposition is clearly expressed.
[35:11.880 --> 35:23.880]  Legislative provisions defining crimes and punishments will, in any case of ambiguity, be given that interpretation favoring the accused, the rule of lenity.
[35:23.880 --> 35:35.880]  Let me back up a couple here and let me show you the problems that they've got with these interpretations as to how they're being not applied by these morons in these lower courts.
[35:35.880 --> 35:53.880]  If possible, no interpretation should be adopted that renders the provision in question or any other provision, superfluous, unlawful, or invalid. Yet every court in Texas, high or low, ignores paragraph 1.1 of SB 971,
[35:53.880 --> 36:21.880]  which is written in the same language in the actual code in paragraph 1.1, and it reads like this, an act relating to the adoption of a non-substantive revision of statutes relating to, drum roll please, transportation, including conforming amendment repeals and penalties.
[36:21.880 --> 36:42.880]  And here's how we read this. The statutes relate to transportation, including conforming amendments relating to transportation, repeals relating to transportation, and penalties relating to transportation.
[36:42.880 --> 36:58.880]  So right there in the very title of the bill itself is what it's for and all that it's for.
[36:58.880 --> 37:14.880]  So in the context of the subject matter, which again, something you need to remember about the Texas Constitution is this, that the Texas Constitution specifically requires in Article 3, Section 35, in the subjects and titles of bills,
[37:14.880 --> 37:31.880]  this is how that reads as a constitutional requirement, subsection A, no bill except general appropriation bills, which may embrace the various subjects and accounts, for and on account of which monies are appropriated, shall contain more than one subject.
[37:31.880 --> 37:53.880]  Well, right here we see the subject, revisions of statutes relating to transportation. The subject is transportation. And yet you have never seen a single court in Texas at any level address the subject matter of the code and the bill that created that code,
[37:53.880 --> 38:05.880]  as being the context in which all the statutes of that code must be applied. None.
[38:05.880 --> 38:23.880]  Then you go to subsection B, the rules or procedure of each house shall require the subject of each bill be expressed in its title in a manner that gives the legislature and the public reasonable notice of that subject.
[38:23.880 --> 38:43.880]  The legislature is solely responsible for determining compliance with the rule. Well, they followed the rule. The rule has it right here relating to transportation and everything we've done in here relating to transportation.
[38:43.880 --> 39:01.880]  So far, so good. C of 35 under Article 3, a law, including a law enacted before the effective date of this subsection may not be held void on the basis of an insufficient title.
[39:01.880 --> 39:15.880]  Well, this title in this bill is not insufficient. It tells us exactly what the subject matter is and what parts of the bill that follows are related to that subject.
[39:15.880 --> 39:24.880]  Because, of course, if it can only have one subject, then everything in it can only be related to that one subject, right?
[39:24.880 --> 39:44.880]  And therefore, if the subject as it reads is transportation, then everything that follows, every offense, every requirement, every provision must be read in the context of the umbrella subject.
[39:44.880 --> 39:58.880]  So that's why I say when you read a definition in a code, make sure you understand what the subject matter of the code actually is. And you do that by looking at the bill that it was codified from.
[39:58.880 --> 40:20.880]  And in this case, this entire bill, which created that entire code, relates to transportation. But nowhere in this bill or in any other bill or in any other law is the term transportation defined.
[40:20.880 --> 40:34.880]  Therefore, the first rule of statutory interpretation is not met, okay, by the statute or the underlying law. Neither contains a definition.
[40:34.880 --> 40:55.880]  So now we have to look and see is there a legal definition or a specialized industry definition, okay? And we'll cover some other rules here in a second that makes the case that that is exactly how this works.
[40:55.880 --> 41:10.880]  And I'll get it to you here in just a second. Well, we do have a definition under the legal slash industry technical terms, and that is what's defined in the legal dictionary for Black's Law.
[41:10.880 --> 41:24.880]  We also have it in buvies. But we know buvies can't apply because the only thing that appears in buvies is the transporting of criminals to a penal colony.
[41:24.880 --> 41:34.880]  Well, Australia was the penal colony in question in those days. Everything else that was here were prisons.
[41:34.880 --> 41:50.880]  So if we had a penal colony, that's where most of the nations were shipping their criminals was to Australia. Australia was one humongous penal colony.
[41:50.880 --> 41:59.880]  Poor aborigine. And then they had it all stolen by the thieves we shipped there. How do you think about that? But I digress.
[41:59.880 --> 42:14.880]  The point here being that we have a special legal slash industry term. Therefore, we cannot go further down to a common English dictionary to get the definition because we've already run aground with a legal definition,
[42:14.880 --> 42:24.880]  a law definition, and a specialized industry term definition for transportation.
[42:24.880 --> 42:35.880]  Now, let me read you some of the other rules here, and you'll see how I come to the conclusion that that is the proper hierarchy to follow.
[42:35.880 --> 42:50.880]  You must also take into account the famous canons of construction. In a particular case, various canons may point in different directions. This does not prove that they are useless, only that all valid clues don't necessarily point in the same direction.
[42:50.880 --> 42:59.880]  It will be your job to persuade the court that most indications from the canons and the principles of statutory construction favor your client's interpretation.
[42:59.880 --> 43:13.880]  The most frequently used canons are the following. One, inclusio unius est exclusio alterius. I've told you this one dozens of times. The inclusion of one implies the exclusion of others.
[43:13.880 --> 43:26.880]  Example, a sign that reads open to persons 21 and over implies that the place is not open to persons under 21.
[43:26.880 --> 43:35.880]  Number two, nocitor asocius. A word is known by the words with which it is associated.
[43:35.880 --> 43:43.880]  We get back on the other side. I'll pick up there and read you some more of this and show you why I believe my premise to be correct.
[43:43.880 --> 43:51.880]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig. We are going through legal reasoning tonight.
[43:51.880 --> 43:59.880]  After we get done with all this, we'll see if we have time left to take any calls. Y'all hang in there and we'll be right back.
[44:22.880 --> 44:27.880]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[44:27.880 --> 44:33.880]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:33.880 --> 44:42.880]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.880 --> 44:51.880]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.880 --> 45:00.880]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.880 --> 45:12.880]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas.
[45:12.880 --> 45:18.880]  I'm Brave New Books and Chase Tank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.880 --> 45:22.880]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:22.880 --> 45:30.880]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian Emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:30.880 --> 45:37.880]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:37.880 --> 45:43.880]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:43.880 --> 45:53.880]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:13.880 --> 46:19.880]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[46:19.880 --> 46:25.880]  If you could not wait any battle to the end, would you purposefully die?
[46:25.880 --> 46:31.880]  Watch your center and the soldier or warrior of love scuffle and they keep the peace.
[46:31.880 --> 46:36.880]  All they're taking is a misunderstanding and somebody calls the police.
[46:36.880 --> 46:51.880]  Watch in the spotlight.
[46:51.880 --> 46:56.880]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:56.880 --> 46:59.880]  Alright, back to the rules of construction here.
[46:59.880 --> 47:06.880]  Number two was Nausicaa associaeus. A word is known by the words with which it is associated.
[47:06.880 --> 47:17.880]  In the phrase staples, rivets, nails, pins, and stakes, the word nails obviously does not refer to fingernails.
[47:17.880 --> 47:30.880]  Three, a jugum generis of the same kind. A general residual category following a list of other items refers to items of the same sort.
[47:30.880 --> 47:41.880]  In the phrase staples, rivets, nails, pins, stakes, and other items, the other items don't include balloons, but only other types of faceters.
[47:41.880 --> 47:49.880]  Four, utmojas valit quam parit, so that it may survive rather than perish.
[47:49.880 --> 47:56.880]  An ambiguous provision should be interpreted in a way that makes it valid rather than invalid.
[47:56.880 --> 48:04.880]  Well folks, when it comes to the Texas Transportation Code, some of these rules cannot possibly be followed
[48:04.880 --> 48:13.880]  because there are provisions in there that are so blatantly unconstitutional on their face for the rights deprivations they create
[48:13.880 --> 48:24.880]  that there can be no saving interpretation for them without discarding words in them, which is forbidden.
[48:24.880 --> 48:37.880]  So when you cannot discard a part of the statute to give it a meaning that would save the statute, the statute is unconstitutional on its face.
[48:37.880 --> 48:42.880]  And there are many of those in the code.
[48:42.880 --> 48:55.880]  But then again, it doesn't matter how many there are in the code because I have evidence, documented, certified documented evidence
[48:55.880 --> 49:10.880]  that the bill was unconstitutionally and therefore illegally passed by the Texas Legislature and was void from day one.
[49:10.880 --> 49:17.880]  And I am trying to raise funds for the lawsuit to go after them for exactly that.
[49:17.880 --> 49:19.880]  And we're still working on that.
[49:19.880 --> 49:21.880]  We still need to get money in for that.
[49:21.880 --> 49:24.880]  So if you're listening to this and you can donate, please do.
[49:24.880 --> 49:29.880]  We're trying to keep the money coming so that we can see this all the way to the end.
[49:29.880 --> 49:34.880]  It would suck to get it started and then run out of funds partway through
[49:34.880 --> 49:42.880]  and not be able to finish it before we get a decision on whether or not it's constitutional.
[49:42.880 --> 49:48.880]  So it's not something I am prepared to just run with as soon as I've got enough to file.
[49:48.880 --> 49:51.880]  I need to make sure I've got enough to finish.
[49:51.880 --> 49:54.880]  And folks, I've got to have you help for that.
[49:54.880 --> 49:56.880]  I cannot afford to do that on my own.
[49:56.880 --> 50:06.880]  But you need to consider the benefit to you, your children, your neighbors, your family of any kind or any sort
[50:06.880 --> 50:13.880]  because without that transportation code, a huge number of police interactions
[50:13.880 --> 50:18.880]  that you otherwise would not have to contend with happen.
[50:18.880 --> 50:23.880]  And the way things are right now, every single one of those encounters
[50:23.880 --> 50:32.880]  could result in somebody being falsely locked up in a jail, physically injured or outright killed.
[50:32.880 --> 50:43.880]  And you could make a 20 or a 10 or a 5 or a $100 donation and solve that whole problem right now.
[50:43.880 --> 50:50.880]  Well, you don't have to worry about that happening because they won't have a code to fall back on.
[50:50.880 --> 50:53.880]  See, there's another standard in law they tend to forget.
[50:53.880 --> 51:00.880]  Everybody thinks, well, if that code's unconstitutional, all they'll do is repeal it and they'll fall back on the old statute.
[51:00.880 --> 51:05.880]  No. Unfortunately, it won't work that way.
[51:05.880 --> 51:08.880]  And you want to know why?
[51:08.880 --> 51:28.880]  Because by legal necessity and logic, an amendment or an addendum to any statutory scheme acts as a repeal of the original.
[51:28.880 --> 51:30.880]  It has to.
[51:30.880 --> 51:37.880]  Here, we're going to add these words to the original one and we're going to make it effective on such and such date.
[51:37.880 --> 51:44.880]  Well, once that thing takes effect, ladies and gentlemen, it's too late.
[51:44.880 --> 51:56.880]  They cannot repeal the existing one and put the old one back in its place because it was repealed by the changed version once it took effect.
[51:56.880 --> 52:04.880]  The only way they can avoid it is if they can void the legislation before the effective date kicks in.
[52:04.880 --> 52:11.880]  Or they have to go back and reenact a new statute to replace both of them if they can.
[52:11.880 --> 52:21.880]  And in this case, they can't because the statute is in a code that is itself unconstitutional as a whole.
[52:21.880 --> 52:32.880]  In its entirety, from the cover to the other cover, it's unconstitutional.
[52:32.880 --> 52:34.880]  Okay?
[52:34.880 --> 52:36.880]  So there's nowhere for them to fall back to.
[52:36.880 --> 52:46.880]  They can't jump back to the old Vernon's because they repealed what was in the old Vernon's when they recodified in the new code in 1995.
[52:46.880 --> 52:54.880]  So the moment we get it declared unconstitutional, they are dead in the water regulating transportation.
[52:54.880 --> 52:58.880]  Completely, totally dead.
[52:58.880 --> 53:01.880]  They have to start from scratch.
[53:01.880 --> 53:16.880]  And if they try to do the same thing that they did in 1995 by passing that entire 4,000-page code, 4,000-plus pages actually, 4,200-plus,
[53:16.880 --> 53:27.880]  and they fail to read it over three several days again, they're right back where they started, which is an unconstitutional enactment.
[53:27.880 --> 53:37.880]  There simply is no way that they can read 1,300-plus pages a day for three days.
[53:37.880 --> 53:40.880]  It's just not going to happen.
[53:40.880 --> 53:48.880]  Especially considering that the entire reason they put in the bill for not doing so was because of the crowded conditions of the calendars of each house.
[53:48.880 --> 53:54.880]  We've got so much legislative crap to do, we can't be bothered to read the stuff we're passing.
[53:54.880 --> 53:58.880]  So for this purpose today, we're going to imitate the United States Congress.
[53:58.880 --> 54:05.880]  And we're just going to sign everything, regardless of whether we've read it, understand it, and know what's in it.
[54:05.880 --> 54:09.880]  We have to pass it to see what's in it.
[54:09.880 --> 54:15.880]  That's your Texas legislature, folks. They've adopted the same bad habits as your Congress.
[54:15.880 --> 54:19.880]  And you let them get away with it.
[54:19.880 --> 54:32.880]  I refuse to let them get away with it. That is how I wound up here in your ears.
[54:32.880 --> 54:34.880]  What are you going to do about it?
[54:34.880 --> 54:37.880]  That's the question of the day. What are you going to do about it?
[54:37.880 --> 54:42.880]  Now let me wrap what's up in this book here.
[54:42.880 --> 54:52.880]  Now after that last rule, we need to understand this. And cases controlled by governing legal texts always begin with the words of the text to establish the major premise.
[54:52.880 --> 54:59.880]  As an example of textual interpretation, consider the positions that advocates might take in a case that is easy to visualize.
[54:59.880 --> 55:04.880]  Let's say that the Jacksons, a couple living in Santa Fe, are divorcing.
[55:04.880 --> 55:11.880]  John is an unemployed carpenter, and his wife Jill is a successful novelist who has written five bestselling mysteries.
[55:11.880 --> 55:17.880]  John lays claim to half her future income on those novels, all of which were written during the marriage.
[55:17.880 --> 55:22.880]  Jill's attorney uncovers a curious provision in the Copyright Act, however.
[55:22.880 --> 55:34.880]  And it reads, when an individual author's ownership of a copyright or of any of the exclusive rights under a copyright has not previously been transferred voluntarily by that author,
[55:34.880 --> 55:46.880]  no action by any governmental body or other official or organization purporting to seize, expropriate, transfer, or exercise rights of ownership with respect to the copyright
[55:46.880 --> 55:53.880]  or any of the exclusive rights under the copyright shall be given effect under this title.
[55:53.880 --> 55:59.880]  Now this provision becomes the major premise in Jill's attorney syllogism. Major premise.
[55:59.880 --> 56:09.880]  Section 201E of the Copyright Act nullifies any government's attempts to transfer any of the exclusive rights conferred by an author's copyright.
[56:09.880 --> 56:19.880]  Minor premise. Treating Jill Jackson's royalties as marital property would transfer her exclusive right to those royalties conferred by her copyright.
[56:19.880 --> 56:30.880]  Conclusion. Section 201E of the Copyright Act nullifies New Mexico's attempt to treat Jill Jackson's royalties on her books as marital property.
[56:30.880 --> 56:36.880]  An excellent argument, right? But the debate is not going to end there.
[56:36.880 --> 56:42.880]  It turns out that the only federal appellate case on point is against Jill.
[56:42.880 --> 56:50.880]  In Rodriguez v. Rodriguez, the Fifth Circuit held that the Copyright Act does not preempt state community property doctrines.
[56:50.880 --> 56:58.880]  This is 218 Federal Third 432, pages 436-37, Fifth Circuit 2000.
[56:58.880 --> 57:03.880]  This is an actual case, okay?
[57:03.880 --> 57:09.880]  Does not preempt state community property doctrines. The Fifth Circuit syllogism on which John's lawyer relies,
[57:09.880 --> 57:18.880]  or the husband, the other side of this case, shows the importance of reading the entire statute, which Jill's lawyer didn't do,
[57:18.880 --> 57:26.880]  before interpreting one of its provisions. That syllogism was as follows.
[57:26.880 --> 57:33.880]  Major premise. Section 106 of the Copyright Act defines only five exclusive rights.
[57:33.880 --> 57:40.880]  Reproduction, adaptation, publication, performance, and display.
[57:40.880 --> 57:52.880]  Minor premise. The future income stream from Jill Jackson's copyrighted works is not a right of reproduction, adaptation, publication, performance, or display.
[57:52.880 --> 58:05.880]  Conclusion. The future income stream from Jill Jackson's copyrighted works is not an exclusive right, insulated from state transfer by Section 201E.
[58:05.880 --> 58:18.880]  All right? Now that's reading further into the statute by the second attorney disavows the points made by the first attorney who only read the single provision.
[58:18.880 --> 58:26.880]  But now we're going to see that both of them have fallen into the same trap when we get back.
[58:26.880 --> 58:33.880]  So folks, y'all hang in there. This is Rule of Law Radio. We will start taking calls probably after this next segment.
[58:33.880 --> 58:41.880]  So if you want to start trying to get ready, the calling number is 512-646-1984.
[58:41.880 --> 58:49.880]  So you can give us a call and start getting in line, and I will start taking calls when I wrap this up on the next segment.
[58:49.880 --> 58:57.880]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.880 --> 59:05.880]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:05.880 --> 59:17.880]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.880 --> 59:27.880]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.880 --> 59:43.880]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102,
[59:43.880 --> 59:50.880]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.880 --> 59:59.880]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[59:59.880 --> 01:00:20.880]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing you daily bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:20.880 --> 01:00:43.880]  Markets for the 7th of December, 2015, open up with gold at $1,084.81 an ounce, silver $14.55 an ounce, Texas crude $39.97 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 387 U.S. currency.
[01:00:43.880 --> 01:00:51.880]  Today in history, Sunday, December 7, 1941, a date which will live in infamy.
[01:00:51.880 --> 01:01:02.880]  As then President Franklin D. Roosevelt stated in his address to the nation about the Imperial Japanese Navy attack consisting of roughly 353 planes on the U.S. fleet at the Pearl Harbor Navy base, which killed over 2,400 people.
[01:01:02.880 --> 01:01:23.880]  Many like retired U.S. Navy Rear Admiral Robert A. Theobald whistled conspiracy by various parties behind the U.S. and British governments and militaries who knew of the attack in advance and may have let them take place and or even encouraged them in order to convince the American populace of the urgent need of getting into World War II.
[01:01:23.880 --> 01:01:32.880]  In recent news, according to the Air Force, the U.S. has fired more than 20,000 missiles and bombs against ISIS since the U.S. bombing campaign against them began about 15 months ago.
[01:01:32.880 --> 01:01:38.880]  Air Force Chief of Staff General Mark Welsh said in a statement that the Air Force is now expending munitions faster than we can replenish them.
[01:01:38.880 --> 01:01:43.880]  He and the department are calling to ramp up funding for Hellfire missiles and weapons production as a whole.
[01:01:43.880 --> 01:01:50.880]  He went on to state that the precision today's war requires demands the right equipment and capability to achieve desired effects.
[01:01:50.880 --> 01:01:56.880]  We need to ensure the necessary funding is in place to not only execute today's wars, but also tomorrow's challenges.
[01:01:56.880 --> 01:02:03.880]  Here at the Lowdown, we can't help but suspect this to be a munitions overkill for the lining of the pockets of the military industrial complex.
[01:02:03.880 --> 01:02:18.880]  Seriously, are multi-million dollar payloads really the way to meet the challenges of fleets of Toyota Tacomas, star piles of AK-47s, munitions, and adobe compounds?
[01:02:18.880 --> 01:02:23.880]  A U.S. appeals court is set to rule on the legality of the new Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality rules.
[01:02:23.880 --> 01:02:27.880]  A three-judge panel questioned lawyers from the FCC and lawyers from the broadband companies.
[01:02:27.880 --> 01:02:36.880]  They are set to rule in regards to whether or not the FCC had the authority to reclassify the Internet as a telecommunications service instead of an information service.
[01:02:36.880 --> 01:02:44.880]  Lawyers forwarded the Internet service providers, arguing that because they flexed some control over pages that they then met the qualifications for an information service provider,
[01:02:44.880 --> 01:02:51.880]  while the FCC counter-argued that the broadband providers were simply transporting data and not necessarily making content decisions.
[01:02:51.880 --> 01:03:12.880]  This has been your Lowdown for December 7, 2013.
[01:03:21.880 --> 01:03:36.880]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:36.880 --> 01:03:38.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:38.880 --> 01:03:45.880]  All right, call in number if you want to get in line, 512-646-1984.
[01:03:45.880 --> 01:03:50.880]  And I'm going to read a little bit more of this here so that we can understand how this works.
[01:03:50.880 --> 01:04:05.880]  As I said, we have Jill's lawyer in this divorce case who read one provision of the Copyright Act and said, hey, you can't take her money because it's an exclusive right that's not subject to state transfer
[01:04:05.880 --> 01:04:11.880]  and give it to her husband as part of communal property for alimony or whatever.
[01:04:11.880 --> 01:04:25.880]  And then his lawyer in the divorce case turns around and says, well, this section says that the exclusive rights enumerated are these, and that future income is not any of these things.
[01:04:25.880 --> 01:04:30.880]  Therefore, it's not omitted from this division.
[01:04:30.880 --> 01:04:38.880]  But now we're going to see proof that neither lawyer read the whole act.
[01:04:38.880 --> 01:04:53.880]  Both sides have begun with the words of the statute, but they have crafted different arguments by emphasizing different aspects of the language, as is possible with even such a short, seemingly straightforward provision.
[01:04:53.880 --> 01:05:16.880]  By the way, the prospective reader will have observed that neither Jill's syllogism nor Johns takes account of the fact that 201E protects not just exclusive rights, but also rights of ownership, a fact that might favor Jill.
[01:05:16.880 --> 01:05:38.880]  And even though it's right there in the language of the same section that her attorney attempted to use to protect her assets, he failed to argue the specific language, the right to ownership, rather than emphasizing the exclusive rights to the production or the adaptations or the other things,
[01:05:38.880 --> 01:05:47.880]  and thus failed in representing her adequately to protect those assets.
[01:05:47.880 --> 01:06:07.880]  So you see, the lawyers are not only not infallible, if you can find one that reads everything you're supposed to read, he will be, by and large, or she, will be the exception. And I don't mean by some small margin or small percentage.
[01:06:07.880 --> 01:06:17.880]  It will be the difference between earth to the moon and earth to the Milky Way. All right?
[01:06:17.880 --> 01:06:38.880]  Because most of these lower courts, especially judges and attorneys, read only what they think they have to know. They belittle any interpretation that disagrees with their single syllable microbial way of thinking about how the statute operates,
[01:06:38.880 --> 01:07:06.880]  because they've not gone outside that provision in any way, shape, or form, and then have the audacity to say that they are giving you a fair trial, even though they have failed to present one shred of rebuttal argument or evidence in relation to your presentation of the law as it exists,
[01:07:06.880 --> 01:07:09.880]  or the statute as it exists.
[01:07:09.880 --> 01:07:20.880]  Now you'll notice here that these two attorneys had to oppose each other. True, this is a divorce case, it's civil. But why does it work differently in a criminal case in these lower courts?
[01:07:20.880 --> 01:07:28.880]  Why do these lower courts think that they have to present nothing even though they bear the burden of proof on the side of the state?
[01:07:28.880 --> 01:07:46.880]  The prosecutor is the one required to prove up this case. The prosecutor is the one required to prove that the subject matter under which the alleged offense occurred is relevant to both the person that was accused and the facts of the case, and they don't.
[01:07:46.880 --> 01:07:53.880]  They simply operate entirely on irrebuttable presumption.
[01:07:53.880 --> 01:08:18.880]  They presume by default that every car is a motor vehicle, that every person is an operator or a driver, but they never consider the meaning of those terms or phrases in relation to the subject matter under which they are created and to which they solely apply, and that is transportation.
[01:08:18.880 --> 01:08:23.880]  The bill that created it says the subject matter is transportation.
[01:08:23.880 --> 01:08:48.880]  Therefore, for any court in Texas to say that transportation is an unrelated, irrelevant, grasping extrales, patronut, sovereign citizen, right-wing extremist argument, it's pure poppycock.
[01:08:48.880 --> 01:09:08.880]  What it is, when they do it the way that I just said, is they are perpetrating fraud, and they are using color of law and the power of their office to facilitate that fraud and to ensure the fraud is not made known.
[01:09:08.880 --> 01:09:28.880]  In other words, they are conspiring and colluding to perpetrate the fraud and then to hide the fraud from the eyes of the public through knowing and willful misinterpretation of the law and the statute as written.
[01:09:28.880 --> 01:09:34.880]  Now, folks, we don't have an honest court in this country at any level.
[01:09:34.880 --> 01:09:40.880]  That is one thing the patronuts have absolutely correct, okay?
[01:09:40.880 --> 01:09:46.880]  And it's about the only thing they have absolutely correct.
[01:09:46.880 --> 01:10:11.880]  We have no valid courts in which to bring an argument for remedy because none of them look to the law or to the Constitution or to moral or ethical reason in terms of law.
[01:10:11.880 --> 01:10:25.880]  The law is a power unto itself even when it runs afoul of the very thing that gives it any power to act at all.
[01:10:25.880 --> 01:10:28.880]  And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the Texas Constitution.
[01:10:28.880 --> 01:10:35.880]  That, ladies and gentlemen, is the United States Constitution.
[01:10:35.880 --> 01:10:43.880]  Because without those documents, we have no government, which wouldn't bother me all that much, okay?
[01:10:43.880 --> 01:10:47.880]  But without them, there is no government.
[01:10:47.880 --> 01:11:01.880]  Without them, government has no power except through brute force, which they have certainly worked to let us know they are more than willing to exercise to keep the power now that they have it
[01:11:01.880 --> 01:11:12.880]  and to even go out of their way to create laws that prevent us from taking it back by whatever means we may need to to get our government and our way of life back.
[01:11:12.880 --> 01:11:17.880]  But then again, everything Hitler did was legal.
[01:11:17.880 --> 01:11:28.880]  Every building he burned down, every person that he killed, every person he had executed and extinguished from the planet because of whatever reasons, everything he did was legal.
[01:11:28.880 --> 01:11:37.880]  Everything Pol Pot did was legal. Everything that Mao Zedong did was legal. Everything Kim Jong-il did was legal.
[01:11:37.880 --> 01:11:44.880]  They simply created a law that said we can do it.
[01:11:44.880 --> 01:12:04.880]  So why in the world would any of you think that a legislature or a Congress passing a law that says this is not legal and we're not going to let you do it would carry any more validity when it's unconstitutional and moral and unethical
[01:12:04.880 --> 01:12:13.880]  than any such decree by any of these other people that we despise throughout history for what they did to their own people?
[01:12:13.880 --> 01:12:21.880]  I'm having a hard time understanding how we could not recognize that as Americans for what it is.
[01:12:21.880 --> 01:12:34.880]  How did we get so far off the beaten path that we can no longer see the obvious when it's standing right in front of us?
[01:12:34.880 --> 01:12:47.880]  I mean, to me it's come to the point where I don't care who the politician is, short of Ron Paul, and I do mean Ron Paul.
[01:12:47.880 --> 01:12:58.880]  It doesn't matter who they are, I hear the exact same word coming out of their mouth no matter what it is they're actually saying.
[01:12:58.880 --> 01:13:17.880]  For instance, the Obama State of the Union address to me sounded just like this, lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie every political speech.
[01:13:17.880 --> 01:13:27.880]  Lie, lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie
[01:13:27.880 --> 01:13:34.100]  That's what every one of them sounds like to me.
[01:13:34.100 --> 01:13:39.160]  So I have no motivation to listen to them on the radio, watch them on a TV because they
[01:13:39.160 --> 01:13:43.040]  all sound exactly the same.
[01:13:43.040 --> 01:13:52.800]  And if you haven't reached this point yet, you're not looking at the fine print because
[01:13:52.800 --> 01:13:57.500]  I don't know why everybody isn't here.
[01:13:57.500 --> 01:14:02.240]  But that being said, you need to understand how their legal reasoning works.
[01:14:02.240 --> 01:14:09.520]  The whole reason I tell you when it comes to these statutes is that you must read them.
[01:14:09.520 --> 01:14:13.380]  You must know the rules better than they know them.
[01:14:13.380 --> 01:14:16.760]  And here's a handful of the ones that they use the most, folks.
[01:14:16.760 --> 01:14:19.920]  I just gave them to you.
[01:14:19.920 --> 01:14:20.920]  Couldn't be any plainer.
[01:14:20.920 --> 01:14:26.160]  I have talked about this since the first day I ever started appearing on this show, that
[01:14:26.160 --> 01:14:28.400]  these are the things you need to know.
[01:14:28.400 --> 01:14:33.440]  And as my knowledge and experience in this has increased, I have done my dead-level best
[01:14:33.440 --> 01:14:35.740]  to share it with you.
[01:14:35.740 --> 01:14:40.740]  And by sharing it with you, I hope to make more of me.
[01:14:40.740 --> 01:14:45.760]  Not because I'm the greatest or I'm the best or I know more than anybody else, but because
[01:14:45.760 --> 01:14:54.040]  I know I'm willing to fight and I know I have the tools and the training to make it a damn
[01:14:54.040 --> 01:14:57.160]  good fight.
[01:14:57.160 --> 01:15:04.960]  And I want to make you capable of the same thing.
[01:15:04.960 --> 01:15:13.880]  So all you got to do is be willing because you're getting what you need, but you've got
[01:15:13.880 --> 01:15:23.060]  to be willing to internalize it, practice it, and make use of it.
[01:15:23.060 --> 01:15:36.380]  No tool is worth anything until a hand picks it up to use it.
[01:15:36.380 --> 01:15:43.500]  And of course, the more experienced and capable the hand, the better the tool will perform
[01:15:43.500 --> 01:15:46.800]  the job it was intended for.
[01:15:46.800 --> 01:15:56.200]  See, the one thing the patronet community has wrong with its method is this, the old
[01:15:56.200 --> 01:16:01.160]  adage of the right tool for the right job.
[01:16:01.160 --> 01:16:06.960]  I'm not saying that in certain conditions, circumstances, that their particular brand
[01:16:06.960 --> 01:16:10.920]  of argument doesn't hold water.
[01:16:10.920 --> 01:16:20.440]  But one thing it does not do, it does not apply in every case across the board.
[01:16:20.440 --> 01:16:22.560]  It doesn't.
[01:16:22.560 --> 01:16:27.320]  Not any more than one pair of shoes will fit anybody in America or any other part of the
[01:16:27.320 --> 01:16:31.720]  world.
[01:16:31.720 --> 01:16:41.180]  We have to understand that, and we have to apply ourselves to that.
[01:16:41.180 --> 01:16:45.600]  We need to learn the right tool for the right job, and I'm trying to give you the tools
[01:16:45.600 --> 01:16:47.000]  for this job.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:54.080]  And this job is criminal due process and fighting criminal accusations in a court under criminal
[01:16:54.080 --> 01:16:55.080]  courts.
[01:16:55.080 --> 01:17:02.080]  Y'all hang on folks, we'll be right back, start taking your calls.
[01:17:02.080 --> 01:17:04.920]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:17:04.920 --> 01:17:08.920]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:08.920 --> 01:17:13.200]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality
[01:17:13.200 --> 01:17:14.480]  coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.480 --> 01:17:18.720]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:18.720 --> 01:17:23.360]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers
[01:17:23.360 --> 01:17:24.360]  and journalists.
[01:17:24.360 --> 01:17:27.280]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:27.280 --> 01:17:32.480]  In addition, we carry popular longevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polynburst.
[01:17:32.480 --> 01:17:37.440]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition
[01:17:37.440 --> 01:17:39.600]  at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:39.600 --> 01:17:43.560]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.560 --> 01:17:46.560]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:46.560 --> 01:17:51.520]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.520 --> 01:17:54.640]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.640 --> 01:18:01.200]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:01.200 --> 01:18:05.800]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:18:05.800 --> 01:18:07.220]  of nutrition.
[01:18:07.220 --> 01:18:11.960]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.960 --> 01:18:17.600]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.600 --> 01:18:23.040]  In a world where natural fruits have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young
[01:18:23.040 --> 01:18:26.240]  Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:26.240 --> 01:18:31.200]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[01:18:31.200 --> 01:18:32.200]  we reject.
[01:18:32.200 --> 01:18:37.440]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[01:18:37.440 --> 01:18:40.280]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.280 --> 01:18:46.640]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:18:46.640 --> 01:18:47.640]  quality radio.
[01:18:47.640 --> 01:18:52.200]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.200 --> 01:18:57.800]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:18:57.800 --> 01:18:59.760]  increase your income.
[01:18:59.760 --> 01:19:02.760]  Order now.
[01:19:02.760 --> 01:19:17.440]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:17.440 --> 01:19:47.200]  All right, folks.
[01:19:47.200 --> 01:19:48.200]  We are back.
[01:19:48.200 --> 01:19:54.360]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:54.360 --> 01:20:01.160]  All right, let's get in line with your questions, queries, posers, and all that good stuff.
[01:20:01.160 --> 01:20:03.800]  We have one caller up on the board.
[01:20:03.800 --> 01:20:09.400]  Let's see if he's snoring this time.
[01:20:09.400 --> 01:20:12.120]  What do you have for a question, Raider?
[01:20:12.120 --> 01:20:14.240]  Good morning, Eddie.
[01:20:14.240 --> 01:20:15.240]  Good morning.
[01:20:15.240 --> 01:20:17.240]  What time zone are you in?
[01:20:17.240 --> 01:20:21.200]  Well, I'm wide awake now, so I'm woken up.
[01:20:21.200 --> 01:20:23.200]  What do you think Trump's going to do?
[01:20:23.200 --> 01:20:25.320]  Do you think he's worth a hill of beans?
[01:20:25.320 --> 01:20:27.320]  Don't know, don't care, don't watch.
[01:20:27.320 --> 01:20:28.320]  All right.
[01:20:28.320 --> 01:20:32.960]  Well, he talks pretty- Did you not listen to my political speeches
[01:20:32.960 --> 01:20:33.960]  a minute ago?
[01:20:33.960 --> 01:20:34.960]  I did.
[01:20:34.960 --> 01:20:35.960]  Okay.
[01:20:35.960 --> 01:20:40.760]  So where would that take us?
[01:20:40.760 --> 01:20:41.760]  He's going to do all these things.
[01:20:41.760 --> 01:20:46.760]  Well, he says he's going to get rid of TSA, he's going to abolish this, abolish that.
[01:20:46.760 --> 01:20:54.320]  Well, see, if this was a video show, I would do for you a Trump speech.
[01:20:54.320 --> 01:21:00.520]  See, I'd put my hand on my head like a rooster's coxcomb waving in a high breeze, and I'd still
[01:21:00.520 --> 01:21:07.040]  go lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie,
[01:21:07.040 --> 01:21:09.040]  lie, lie, lie, lie.
[01:21:09.040 --> 01:21:10.040]  Okay?
[01:21:10.040 --> 01:21:11.040]  Yeah.
[01:21:11.040 --> 01:21:12.160]  I feel the same way.
[01:21:12.160 --> 01:21:19.080]  I think he's a, as you say, a poser, a poser to the freedom movement.
[01:21:19.080 --> 01:21:21.200]  You keep talking like he's the only one.
[01:21:21.200 --> 01:21:26.320]  No, he's the one that's talking the loudest and trying to, he's the one that's supposed
[01:21:26.320 --> 01:21:27.320]  to be the savior.
[01:21:27.320 --> 01:21:28.320]  He's been demonized.
[01:21:28.320 --> 01:21:29.320]  Right.
[01:21:29.320 --> 01:21:35.320]  Did you not go back and watch all the old Obama speeches?
[01:21:35.320 --> 01:21:37.320]  He wasn't exactly quiet.
[01:21:37.320 --> 01:21:38.320]  No.
[01:21:38.320 --> 01:21:41.240]  No, well, we don't even know who he was.
[01:21:41.240 --> 01:21:44.640]  At least we have an idea of who this guy is, but we don't even know who he was.
[01:21:44.640 --> 01:21:45.640]  He came out of the thin air.
[01:21:45.640 --> 01:21:49.960]  Obama came out of thin air, but that's how it was.
[01:21:49.960 --> 01:21:53.680]  Well, so does a fart, but I wouldn't put it in as president either.
[01:21:53.680 --> 01:21:54.680]  Yeah.
[01:21:54.680 --> 01:21:59.360]  Anyway, let's talk about the National Defense Authorization Act.
[01:21:59.360 --> 01:22:00.360]  Why?
[01:22:00.360 --> 01:22:02.360]  How's that a question?
[01:22:02.360 --> 01:22:05.440]  Yeah, that's a question about it.
[01:22:05.440 --> 01:22:10.560]  The question about the National Defense Authorization Act, isn't that in place right now?
[01:22:10.560 --> 01:22:15.920]  Is that superseding the constitution?
[01:22:15.920 --> 01:22:18.320]  What do you mean is it's superseding the constitution?
[01:22:18.320 --> 01:22:22.240]  Well, Mrs. Obama passed at New Year's Eve 2012.
[01:22:22.240 --> 01:22:23.240]  Okay.
[01:22:23.240 --> 01:22:24.240]  And that's-
[01:22:24.240 --> 01:22:26.400]  First off, give me a context for your question.
[01:22:26.400 --> 01:22:34.000]  What is he doing that you are alleging is being authorized by the NDAA that you are
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:43.960]  considering to be in excess of or in violation of constitutional prohibitions or limitations?
[01:22:43.960 --> 01:22:48.720]  Well, for one thing, they have the right-
[01:22:48.720 --> 01:22:50.720]  Who has a right?
[01:22:50.720 --> 01:22:51.720]  Who has a right?
[01:22:51.720 --> 01:22:52.720]  To do?
[01:22:52.720 --> 01:23:00.920]  Department of Homeland Security, any law enforcement agency, for example, to take a person into
[01:23:00.920 --> 01:23:10.320]  custody if they feel that they are a threat without any form of charges, without the access
[01:23:10.320 --> 01:23:13.240]  to a lawyer?
[01:23:13.240 --> 01:23:14.240]  That's one thing, for example.
[01:23:14.240 --> 01:23:18.400]  That's the main thing, for example, the biggest violation, for example.
[01:23:18.400 --> 01:23:19.400]  And I talked to a-
[01:23:19.400 --> 01:23:20.400]  Okay.
[01:23:20.400 --> 01:23:22.520]  Have you read the bill to see that that's actually in there?
[01:23:22.520 --> 01:23:27.360]  That was like 1,200, 1,300 pages, as you said.
[01:23:27.360 --> 01:23:31.120]  Okay, again, not the answer to the question asked.
[01:23:31.120 --> 01:23:32.120]  What?
[01:23:32.120 --> 01:23:36.800]  We have to pass the bill first to see what's in it.
[01:23:36.800 --> 01:23:40.160]  Okay, so back to my question.
[01:23:40.160 --> 01:23:47.760]  Have you read it to see if those provisions are actually in it or implied as being in
[01:23:47.760 --> 01:23:48.760]  it?
[01:23:48.760 --> 01:23:49.760]  What?
[01:23:49.760 --> 01:23:54.520]  A friend of mine, as a matter of fact, won a lawsuit against the New York City Police
[01:23:54.520 --> 01:23:58.080]  Department for excessive force.
[01:23:58.080 --> 01:24:02.480]  She was in New York, you know, back on 9-11, and she protested and she got arrested and
[01:24:02.480 --> 01:24:03.480]  abused and all that kind of stuff.
[01:24:03.480 --> 01:24:07.920]  But anyway, she looked into it, she looked into it.
[01:24:07.920 --> 01:24:12.680]  And she said, when I was talking to her about rights, because she won a case, and I have
[01:24:12.680 --> 01:24:16.120]  three court cases, you know, three court dates coming up, and I wanted to get her advice
[01:24:16.120 --> 01:24:19.160]  and see if she can steer me to somebody who might be able to help me in my cases.
[01:24:19.160 --> 01:24:23.280]  And she says, you don't have any rights on the National Defense Authorization Act.
[01:24:23.280 --> 01:24:30.160]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:24:30.160 --> 01:24:40.360]  Rule number one of anything dealing with anything legal, especially the law itself.
[01:24:40.360 --> 01:24:48.760]  I don't care if you're the best lawyer on the planet is your mother and she is your
[01:24:48.760 --> 01:24:51.280]  counsel.
[01:24:51.280 --> 01:25:02.000]  You do not take anyone's word about anything in any law ever.
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  If you do not read it, you do not know what it says.
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:12.760]  What you know is hearsay.
[01:25:12.760 --> 01:25:17.320]  What you know is someone else's interpretation.
[01:25:17.320 --> 01:25:23.920]  What you know is what they read into it or failed to read into it.
[01:25:23.920 --> 01:25:31.760]  But you will not know that any of that has occurred because you have not read it.
[01:25:31.760 --> 01:25:32.760]  Follow?
[01:25:32.760 --> 01:25:40.800]  I follow, but the Patriot Act, I guess, yeah, it's hearsay, but they say it's very similar
[01:25:40.800 --> 01:25:42.800]  to what the Patriot Act says.
[01:25:42.800 --> 01:25:43.800]  Okay.
[01:25:43.800 --> 01:25:46.720]  They said the same thing about margarine and butter.
[01:25:46.720 --> 01:25:49.280]  What the hell is your point?
[01:25:49.280 --> 01:26:00.540]  Here is the other rule, the maximum of law, something similar is never the same.
[01:26:00.540 --> 01:26:07.360]  So don't be comparing this law to that law, especially when you haven't read either one
[01:26:07.360 --> 01:26:08.360]  of them.
[01:26:08.360 --> 01:26:15.780]  I read a bunch of the articles in the Patriot Act.
[01:26:15.780 --> 01:26:20.640]  Did you not read this or listen to this example of reading part of a statute versus reading
[01:26:20.640 --> 01:26:22.120]  all of a statute first?
[01:26:22.120 --> 01:26:23.120]  Yes, I did.
[01:26:23.120 --> 01:26:26.840]  And that's what I'm going to try to be using in my argument in the courts, for example,
[01:26:26.840 --> 01:26:28.200]  getting down to my court cases.
[01:26:28.200 --> 01:26:31.400]  But if I go in there and tell them, hey, you read the whole statute, they just totally
[01:26:31.400 --> 01:26:32.400]  ignore it.
[01:26:32.400 --> 01:26:36.800]  I think the key is you've got to get to the superior court and you can't use the municipal
[01:26:36.800 --> 01:26:37.800]  or the circuit court.
[01:26:37.800 --> 01:26:38.800]  You've got to go above.
[01:26:38.800 --> 01:26:42.240]  You've got to go to the superior court to get anything dismissed.
[01:26:42.240 --> 01:26:47.120]  But anyway, yeah, I hear what you're saying.
[01:26:47.120 --> 01:26:52.880]  Until you wrap this up in an impenetrable bubble, it will get you nowhere.
[01:26:52.880 --> 01:26:57.600]  And the only way to make sure that it's an impenetrable bubble is to make sure that there
[01:26:57.600 --> 01:27:05.160]  is not a statutory provision unread and unutilized that would be used to poke a hole in that
[01:27:05.160 --> 01:27:10.360]  bubble.
[01:27:10.360 --> 01:27:18.480]  And until you read and understand what you read, that will always wind up being the case.
[01:27:18.480 --> 01:27:25.440]  Because as we just read here in this example, even though they both read the same provision,
[01:27:25.440 --> 01:27:31.660]  neither of them picked up on the ownership rights.
[01:27:31.660 --> 01:27:38.160]  Neither of them, because they were so set on the point they wanted to make and protect,
[01:27:38.160 --> 01:27:51.640]  they ignored alternative threads that might have helped them stitch a stronger suit.
[01:27:51.640 --> 01:27:54.000]  And you have to worry about the same thing.
[01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:03.160]  Should I bring the whole, I guess the whole Uniform Statute Code book to them and read
[01:28:03.160 --> 01:28:04.160]  it first and then-
[01:28:04.160 --> 01:28:05.160]  Okay.
[01:28:05.160 --> 01:28:09.080]  Wait, wait, wait, okay, listen to me.
[01:28:09.080 --> 01:28:14.960]  There is a difference in what I argue in the Transportation Code versus what you are attempting
[01:28:14.960 --> 01:28:18.080]  to argue by going into the Code itself.
[01:28:18.080 --> 01:28:23.080]  It's a merits argument versus a jurisdictional argument.
[01:28:23.080 --> 01:28:30.320]  In a merits argument, you have to go through literally possibly dozens, if not hundreds
[01:28:30.320 --> 01:28:36.120]  of statutes to make your point, because they will be interlinked in many ways.
[01:28:36.120 --> 01:28:44.600]  And you've got to uncover them all or risk losing to an unused argument or losing to
[01:28:44.600 --> 01:28:49.440]  a well-willed argument that you didn't know existed.
[01:28:49.440 --> 01:28:53.680]  Whereas a jurisdictional argument goes back to what I was talking about in the very first
[01:28:53.680 --> 01:28:58.880]  paragraph of the bill that created the Code.
[01:28:58.880 --> 01:29:01.640]  What's the subject matter?
[01:29:01.640 --> 01:29:07.600]  Since this is the subject, everything in the Code is under the umbrella of this subject.
[01:29:07.600 --> 01:29:14.840]  Therefore, any interpretation of what it means has to be within the scope of this umbrella.
[01:29:14.840 --> 01:29:22.320]  If it is outside of the scope of this umbrella, it does not apply to me if I'm not under the
[01:29:22.320 --> 01:29:25.200]  umbrella myself.
[01:29:25.200 --> 01:29:32.640]  And until you present actual evidence that I was acting under the umbrella, then you
[01:29:32.640 --> 01:29:38.400]  have no power to use that statute against me.
[01:29:38.400 --> 01:29:42.720]  That's a subject matter jurisdiction challenge.
[01:29:42.720 --> 01:29:49.720]  It has nothing to do with the statutes themselves or the merits of the allegation.
[01:29:49.720 --> 01:29:53.280]  Big difference in the way of waging the battle and fighting the war.
[01:29:53.280 --> 01:29:54.280]  Hang on.
[01:29:54.280 --> 01:29:57.280]  We'll be right back.
[01:29:57.280 --> 01:30:07.880]  This lemon slice is as sweet as lemon meringue pie, and these raw cranberries taste like
[01:30:07.880 --> 01:30:08.880]  candy.
[01:30:08.880 --> 01:30:09.880]  Am I crazy?
[01:30:09.880 --> 01:30:11.480]  No, but I do have a secret.
[01:30:11.480 --> 01:30:16.320]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back to tell you what it is.
[01:30:16.320 --> 01:30:17.920]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:17.920 --> 01:30:21.520]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.520 --> 01:30:26.280]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.280 --> 01:30:31.320]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.320 --> 01:30:34.040]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.040 --> 01:30:38.320]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[01:30:38.320 --> 01:30:41.880]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.880 --> 01:30:45.280]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:45.280 --> 01:30:48.320]  It's been called a hallucinogen for the tongue.
[01:30:48.320 --> 01:30:52.920]  Miracle fruit, or Sinsipalum dulcificum, is a small red fruit from West Africa.
[01:30:52.920 --> 01:30:58.040]  Eating just one tiny berry makes sour things taste sweet for up to two hours.
[01:30:58.040 --> 01:31:02.620]  The secret is a substance called Miraculin, a protein that binds to the taste buds to
[01:31:02.620 --> 01:31:06.040]  make the sourest of foods taste like they've been dipped in sugar.
[01:31:06.040 --> 01:31:11.000]  Food aficionados have been throwing taste-tripping parties where they eat the fruit, then sip
[01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:16.160]  vinegar, suck lemons, and crunch pickles to experience the amazing effects.
[01:31:16.160 --> 01:31:19.120]  Miracle fruit is safe, legal, and readily available by mail.
[01:31:19.120 --> 01:31:22.840]  Now all we need is a fruit to take the calories out of cheesecake.
[01:31:22.840 --> 01:31:24.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:24.840 --> 01:31:31.120]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.120 --> 01:31:36.480]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:36.480 --> 01:31:38.520]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.520 --> 01:31:43.560]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.560 --> 01:31:47.640]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow
[01:31:47.640 --> 01:31:49.000]  first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:52.840]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a structural engineer, I'm a New York City correctional,
[01:31:52.840 --> 01:31:57.560]  I'm an Air Force pilot, I'm a father who lost his son, we're Americans, and we deserve
[01:31:57.560 --> 01:31:58.560]  the truth.
[01:31:58.560 --> 01:32:00.560]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.560 --> 01:32:03.400]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.400 --> 01:32:06.680]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.680 --> 01:32:10.320]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[01:32:10.320 --> 01:32:11.320]  them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.320 --> 01:32:14.920]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:14.920 --> 01:32:18.720]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:32:18.720 --> 01:32:21.480]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.480 --> 01:32:22.480]  And we accept Bitcoin.
[01:32:22.480 --> 01:32:27.080]  As a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints, you
[01:32:27.080 --> 01:32:31.440]  can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[01:32:31.440 --> 01:32:32.520]  first time.
[01:32:32.520 --> 01:32:41.160]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com, mention the crypto show, and get $100 off,
[01:32:41.160 --> 01:32:45.800]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.800 --> 01:32:50.920]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.920 --> 01:32:57.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.200]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.200 --> 01:33:01.520]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:01.520 --> 01:33:11.560]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:34:01.520 --> 01:34:14.200]  All right, folks.
[01:34:14.200 --> 01:34:15.200]  We are back.
[01:34:15.200 --> 01:34:16.560]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:34:16.560 --> 01:34:21.960]  The call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:34:21.960 --> 01:34:24.200]  Right now we are talking to Truth Raider.
[01:34:24.200 --> 01:34:28.920]  All right, Raider, what was your next bit of things to get into?
[01:34:28.920 --> 01:34:33.480]  Well, okay, do you have any more calls on the board or?
[01:34:33.480 --> 01:34:34.480]  At the moment, no.
[01:34:34.480 --> 01:34:35.480]  Okay.
[01:34:35.480 --> 01:34:36.480]  All right.
[01:34:36.480 --> 01:34:40.520]  I'll go ahead and finish up here with my questions here.
[01:34:40.520 --> 01:34:47.520]  Anyway, before that, this is what happened in court on November the 30th concerning not
[01:34:47.520 --> 01:34:52.440]  presenting a license or a permit to an officer when requested.
[01:34:52.440 --> 01:34:59.080]  They willed it down from being a misdemeanor to just being a simple violation, similar
[01:34:59.080 --> 01:35:06.640]  to what the judge said was simple and the same as a traffic ticket, just like an infraction.
[01:35:06.640 --> 01:35:09.040]  Just pay us $110 before a certain period of time.
[01:35:09.040 --> 01:35:11.040]  I said, no, I want to set for trial.
[01:35:11.040 --> 01:35:12.040]  Okay.
[01:35:12.040 --> 01:35:17.920]  I'll set for trial from March 14th, 2006.
[01:35:17.920 --> 01:35:24.240]  And I told her, you know, that all of this is commercial statutes and has nothing to
[01:35:24.240 --> 01:35:26.920]  do with me, just exactly as it is.
[01:35:26.920 --> 01:35:32.680]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:35:32.680 --> 01:35:34.440]  What state are you in right now?
[01:35:34.440 --> 01:35:35.440]  Oregon.
[01:35:35.440 --> 01:35:37.680]  How long you been there?
[01:35:37.680 --> 01:35:39.640]  Four years.
[01:35:39.640 --> 01:35:42.400]  And how much of these have you actually read?
[01:35:42.400 --> 01:35:49.840]  Well, I haven't read it, I have to go look it up, but when I did look up the statutes
[01:35:49.840 --> 01:35:53.600]  during the summertime for the first ticket that I got, I read a lot of the statutes.
[01:35:53.600 --> 01:35:55.920]  It's all commercial language, all legalese.
[01:35:55.920 --> 01:36:00.280]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:36:00.280 --> 01:36:02.800]  What do you mean all commercial language?
[01:36:02.800 --> 01:36:10.320]  Well, it says driver and- Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:36:10.320 --> 01:36:13.960]  Does the statute- Whoa.
[01:36:13.960 --> 01:36:18.560]  Does the statute give a definition for the term driver?
[01:36:18.560 --> 01:36:20.480]  This one doesn't.
[01:36:20.480 --> 01:36:24.200]  No, it just says everyone is inclusive.
[01:36:24.200 --> 01:36:25.200]  No.
[01:36:25.200 --> 01:36:31.360]  Guaranteed, that answer is dead wrong.
[01:36:31.360 --> 01:36:34.760]  There will be a definition for driver.
[01:36:34.760 --> 01:36:38.800]  There will be a definition for operator.
[01:36:38.800 --> 01:36:41.680]  You haven't found them, have you?
[01:36:41.680 --> 01:36:45.200]  I found US title code 18, section 31, subsection 31.
[01:36:45.200 --> 01:36:51.360]  I'm sorry, can you please tell me when Oregon became a federal territory to which title
[01:36:51.360 --> 01:36:54.360]  18 freaking applies?
[01:36:54.360 --> 01:36:58.160]  Part of the union.
[01:36:58.160 --> 01:37:03.000]  That doesn't make it a federal territory.
[01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:12.920]  Any more than shopping at Walmart makes you a freaking bad boy.
[01:37:12.920 --> 01:37:20.160]  Have you read the Oregon statute and learned the definition of the terms or not?
[01:37:20.160 --> 01:37:21.160]  I have them.
[01:37:21.160 --> 01:37:22.840]  Yes, I have them on file three.
[01:37:22.840 --> 01:37:27.000]  Then how can you tell me that it's not in there if you have them?
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:29.120]  Yes, I do.
[01:37:29.120 --> 01:37:32.120]  I have them downloaded on my computer.
[01:37:32.120 --> 01:37:37.800]  I have them in my box and I can pull them up and I can read them.
[01:37:37.800 --> 01:37:44.160]  In the definition of driver, can you please tell me where the term commerce, commercial,
[01:37:44.160 --> 01:37:47.960]  or engaged in the business is a part of the definition?
[01:37:47.960 --> 01:37:52.120]  I go in and look them up right now.
[01:37:52.120 --> 01:37:53.280]  I can find that.
[01:37:53.280 --> 01:37:58.920]  I bet you can't because it isn't going to be in there and it's not going to be in there
[01:37:58.920 --> 01:38:02.800]  for operator either.
[01:38:02.800 --> 01:38:08.360]  The problem here is, is because of how you've learned it applies in other areas, you are
[01:38:08.360 --> 01:38:12.120]  making a presumption of how it applies in this area.
[01:38:12.120 --> 01:38:19.440]  Now, full on, you are correct, but the problem here is, is you can't go into a court and
[01:38:19.440 --> 01:38:21.560]  prove it.
[01:38:21.560 --> 01:38:28.640]  When you start making allegations of this is what it is, that is the duty that you adopt.
[01:38:28.640 --> 01:38:33.280]  But isn't my argument to challenge them to prove to me that I...
[01:38:33.280 --> 01:38:40.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:44.480]  We're not talking about what their duty is when you're the one sitting in the court making
[01:38:44.480 --> 01:38:46.400]  a freaking argument.
[01:38:46.400 --> 01:38:51.480]  You're the one sitting out there telling the judge what the law is, aren't you?
[01:38:51.480 --> 01:38:56.040]  Well, judges don't even read the law.
[01:38:56.040 --> 01:39:02.600]  One of these days, you're going to actually answer the question I ask you.
[01:39:02.600 --> 01:39:11.080]  Did you not just tell me that you were standing there telling the judge that this is all commercial?
[01:39:11.080 --> 01:39:13.280]  I did tell her that that's commercial.
[01:39:13.280 --> 01:39:14.280]  Fine.
[01:39:14.280 --> 01:39:21.600]  Then you bear the burden of proof for that assumption and that assertion and that argument,
[01:39:21.600 --> 01:39:26.240]  not them, because they're not making it, you are.
[01:39:26.240 --> 01:39:30.640]  But how can I do that if it won't define that it's commercial only and applies to only commercial
[01:39:30.640 --> 01:39:33.600]  activity only?
[01:39:33.600 --> 01:39:41.160]  Well, gee, Raider, if they'd made it where it was that freaking simple, they wouldn't
[01:39:41.160 --> 01:39:45.600]  have been able to steal money for this damn long, would they?
[01:39:45.600 --> 01:39:46.600]  No.
[01:39:46.600 --> 01:39:52.440]  So, the point is, is you have to learn how those statutes were designed to apply in the
[01:39:52.440 --> 01:39:54.960]  first place, don't you?
[01:39:54.960 --> 01:39:56.400]  Yes.
[01:39:56.400 --> 01:40:02.400]  And you're not going to learn that by reading the tricky definition, are you?
[01:40:02.400 --> 01:40:03.440]  No.
[01:40:03.440 --> 01:40:05.860]  So what does that tell you?
[01:40:05.860 --> 01:40:11.320]  What does that tell you you need to be looking for?
[01:40:11.320 --> 01:40:13.320]  All those definitions, of course, yeah.
[01:40:13.320 --> 01:40:19.040]  Use of driver, transportation, operator, whether it be navigator, carrier.
[01:40:19.040 --> 01:40:20.040]  Okay.
[01:40:20.040 --> 01:40:21.400]  I'm sorry.
[01:40:21.400 --> 01:40:26.520]  Let me try this in a different language.
[01:40:26.520 --> 01:40:39.800]  Third grader, can you take the bad words and make them good words by using only the bad
[01:40:39.800 --> 01:40:44.320]  words?
[01:40:44.320 --> 01:40:47.120]  No, we just have bad words.
[01:40:47.120 --> 01:40:48.120]  Thank you.
[01:40:48.120 --> 01:40:56.000]  So when I just asked you, where do you plan on getting the proof you're looking for in
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:40:58.880]  the bad definitions?
[01:40:58.880 --> 01:40:59.880]  And what do you say?
[01:40:59.880 --> 01:41:03.520]  Oh, well, I plan on using the bad definitions.
[01:41:03.520 --> 01:41:05.840]  No, you don't.
[01:41:05.840 --> 01:41:10.400]  Not if you're smart, because if you're smart, you realize you're shooting yourself right
[01:41:10.400 --> 01:41:11.780]  between the eyes.
[01:41:11.780 --> 01:41:13.400]  What you want isn't there.
[01:41:13.400 --> 01:41:14.400]  I know.
[01:41:14.400 --> 01:41:20.440]  And I told the judge, hey, they removed all the proper definitions of what it really means
[01:41:20.440 --> 01:41:26.880]  without even asking us for permission or voting on it, voting to change it, to make everyone
[01:41:26.880 --> 01:41:27.880]  inclusive.
[01:41:27.880 --> 01:41:28.880]  Okay.
[01:41:28.880 --> 01:41:31.560]  So once again, you made a legal assertion that you can't prove.
[01:41:31.560 --> 01:41:38.680]  Well, all I can say is that- Hey, judge, your ass is really gold-plated.
[01:41:38.680 --> 01:41:44.720]  If you'll get up and throw that robe up over your head, I'll demonstrate it to the court.
[01:41:44.720 --> 01:41:45.720]  Good luck.
[01:41:45.720 --> 01:41:46.720]  All right.
[01:41:46.720 --> 01:41:54.080]  Do you remember that thing about what happens at the traffic stop when you don't have a
[01:41:54.080 --> 01:41:56.140]  way to respond to whatever they're doing?
[01:41:56.140 --> 01:41:58.600]  What is the primary rule?
[01:41:58.600 --> 01:42:02.400]  Well, you're pretty easy.
[01:42:02.400 --> 01:42:05.240]  Let me give you a hint.
[01:42:05.240 --> 01:42:07.280]  Shut up.
[01:42:07.280 --> 01:42:09.040]  All right.
[01:42:09.040 --> 01:42:16.480]  Which is followed by the second rule of- Keep shutting up.
[01:42:16.480 --> 01:42:22.720]  And the third rule after the second rule is- Keep shutting up some more.
[01:42:22.720 --> 01:42:24.280]  There you go.
[01:42:24.280 --> 01:42:31.200]  Why are you standing in a courtroom shooting your case dead as a horse at a meat factory
[01:42:31.200 --> 01:42:35.440]  by arguing with this judge about what the law is?
[01:42:35.440 --> 01:42:39.040]  When you yourself- My freedom of speech to tell her that this
[01:42:39.040 --> 01:42:41.960]  is wrong- Hey, you know what?
[01:42:41.960 --> 01:42:46.200]  Freedom of speech applies to those that confess to murder too, and it ain't going to get their
[01:42:46.200 --> 01:42:54.800]  ass off of death row when they're done by claiming freedom of speech.
[01:42:54.800 --> 01:42:57.480]  That's an asinine defense, Raider.
[01:42:57.480 --> 01:43:01.040]  Stop pulling that crap.
[01:43:01.040 --> 01:43:03.360]  That is not the way it works.
[01:43:03.360 --> 01:43:10.600]  If you don't know that, pay the damn ticket and go home, because what you screw up in
[01:43:10.600 --> 01:43:16.920]  there today cascades down to the next person behind you.
[01:43:16.920 --> 01:43:22.120]  Every time somebody goes into one of these courts and pulls that crap, you are pissing
[01:43:22.120 --> 01:43:26.480]  all over the next person in line, whether you realize it or not.
[01:43:26.480 --> 01:43:31.280]  Because even if they know what they're doing and what they're talking about, not only do
[01:43:31.280 --> 01:43:37.360]  they have to make their case, they have to overcome yours.
[01:43:37.360 --> 01:43:39.320]  Stop doing this crap.
[01:43:39.320 --> 01:43:40.440]  Hang on.
[01:43:40.440 --> 01:43:42.640]  I want to yell at you some more.
[01:43:42.640 --> 01:43:45.760]  All right, folks.
[01:43:45.760 --> 01:43:51.440]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:43:51.440 --> 01:43:55.920]  I still got no callers, so I'm going to have to keep beating on Raider while he's here.
[01:43:55.920 --> 01:44:00.320]  We'll be right back, so y'all hang on.
[01:44:00.320 --> 01:44:03.720]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:03.720 --> 01:44:04.720]  Sorry.
[01:44:04.720 --> 01:44:07.680]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.680 --> 01:44:08.680]  What?
[01:44:08.680 --> 01:44:12.360]  You may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.360 --> 01:44:18.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity
[01:44:18.000 --> 01:44:19.200]  at an early age.
[01:44:19.200 --> 01:44:23.180]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home
[01:44:23.180 --> 01:44:25.280]  in America, the television.
[01:44:25.280 --> 01:44:30.320]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.320 --> 01:44:34.080]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering
[01:44:34.080 --> 01:44:36.400]  from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.400 --> 01:44:40.640]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries
[01:44:40.640 --> 01:44:43.280]  without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.280 --> 01:44:50.680]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.680 --> 01:44:54.720]  or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.720 --> 01:44:58.160]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:58.160 --> 01:45:00.000]  and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.480]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.480 --> 01:45:11.240]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:11.240 --> 01:45:14.400]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.400 --> 01:45:18.920]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.920 --> 01:45:23.720]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.720 --> 01:45:28.120]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.120 --> 01:45:34.120]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.120 --> 01:45:39.400]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[01:45:39.400 --> 01:45:43.680]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.680 --> 01:45:49.880]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.880 --> 01:45:52.320]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.320 --> 01:46:05.040]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:05.040 --> 01:46:24.040]  If you did not have a problem, where are you going to look for one?
[01:46:24.040 --> 01:46:33.040]  If you could not wait any battle to love, would you purposefully die?
[01:46:33.040 --> 01:46:44.200]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:44.200 --> 01:46:45.680]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:45.680 --> 01:46:49.920]  We are now entering the last segment of this show, and we have Truth Radar on here, making
[01:46:49.920 --> 01:46:53.080]  me really upset.
[01:46:53.080 --> 01:46:58.400]  And I'm trying to save him from himself, but he keeps jumping out of damned airplanes without
[01:46:58.400 --> 01:47:03.160]  his chute and thinking that it's okay.
[01:47:03.160 --> 01:47:07.760]  Now back to my original question here that you have still failed to answer because you're
[01:47:07.760 --> 01:47:12.280]  not thinking clearly or something, but let's try this once more.
[01:47:12.280 --> 01:47:16.680]  Frustrated and confused, that's what it is, Eddie.
[01:47:16.680 --> 01:47:17.680]  Frustrated and confused.
[01:47:17.680 --> 01:47:20.760]  No, I'm neither of those things.
[01:47:20.760 --> 01:47:22.760]  Well, I am.
[01:47:22.760 --> 01:47:23.760]  Okay.
[01:47:23.760 --> 01:47:30.080]  That part's obvious, but the question here is why are you frustrated and confused?
[01:47:30.080 --> 01:47:32.520]  You're frustrated and confused because you're not paying attention.
[01:47:32.520 --> 01:47:33.520]  Well, that's what I'm talking about.
[01:47:33.520 --> 01:47:34.520]  That's why.
[01:47:34.520 --> 01:47:35.520]  Well, but I've told you...
[01:47:35.520 --> 01:47:40.120] ...in commerce, transportation, what do you not understand about that?
[01:47:40.120 --> 01:47:49.840]  Why do you want to insist on applying everything that's commercial to private travel, you know?
[01:47:49.840 --> 01:47:53.680]  You know it and I know it, so why do you keep insisting on doing that?
[01:47:53.680 --> 01:47:56.960]  That's what I tell them.
[01:47:56.960 --> 01:48:01.840]  The problem is you're making a presumption that they know anything.
[01:48:01.840 --> 01:48:04.480]  They don't get paid enough to know anything.
[01:48:04.480 --> 01:48:06.680]  They're not there to think.
[01:48:06.680 --> 01:48:09.880]  They're not actually capable in most cases.
[01:48:09.880 --> 01:48:13.600]  Legal reasoning is not within their power.
[01:48:13.600 --> 01:48:19.640]  They don't get paid enough to spend time making it be within their power.
[01:48:19.640 --> 01:48:26.200]  There are very few people on this planet dedicated enough to make themselves the best at what
[01:48:26.200 --> 01:48:29.440]  they do at their own expense.
[01:48:29.440 --> 01:48:35.440]  If somebody isn't covering it for them or there isn't some huge reward in doing so,
[01:48:35.440 --> 01:48:38.780]  they will do only enough to get by.
[01:48:38.780 --> 01:48:43.160]  You know this, I would think, by now.
[01:48:43.160 --> 01:48:46.080]  So what makes you think these people are any different?
[01:48:46.080 --> 01:48:51.600]  Now I brought up the 30 little known facts about America and it says in there that there
[01:48:51.600 --> 01:48:52.600]  are no justice...
[01:48:52.600 --> 01:48:54.160]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:48:54.160 --> 01:48:58.160]  You brought up what?
[01:48:58.160 --> 01:49:06.160]  It was very interesting research that was done and there was 30 items saying what is
[01:49:06.160 --> 01:49:10.000]  wrong with our country and this is the evidence of what is wrong with our country.
[01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:20.840]  Excuse me for asking what would seem to most people to probably be a pretty obvious answer
[01:49:20.840 --> 01:49:25.720]  that I ought to know for some reason.
[01:49:25.720 --> 01:49:30.680]  But what the Sam Hill does that have to do with the allegation against you?
[01:49:30.680 --> 01:49:36.600]  Well, they're able to use the allegations against me because of their subversion of
[01:49:36.600 --> 01:49:37.600]  the definitions.
[01:49:37.600 --> 01:49:44.160]  As you say, they circumvented and they removed definitions so that way they can get away
[01:49:44.160 --> 01:49:46.360]  with what they're doing.
[01:49:46.360 --> 01:49:51.800]  Do you listen to what you get asked or do you just hear me?
[01:49:51.800 --> 01:50:00.240]  Do I sound like Linus's freaking parents on peanuts?
[01:50:00.240 --> 01:50:05.000]  Is that what I sound like when I'm asking you a question?
[01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:09.440]  Then listen to what you're hearing here and answer what I'm asking.
[01:50:09.440 --> 01:50:16.360]  How does these 31 things wrong with the country have a damn thing to do with the traffic case
[01:50:16.360 --> 01:50:19.200]  allegation against you?
[01:50:19.200 --> 01:50:21.720]  How is it relevant?
[01:50:21.720 --> 01:50:24.920]  It's part of the corruption.
[01:50:24.920 --> 01:50:29.920]  You're making the presumption there is corruption rather than simple stupidity and uneducated
[01:50:29.920 --> 01:50:32.720]  morons.
[01:50:32.720 --> 01:50:35.480]  You are presuming too much.
[01:50:35.480 --> 01:50:42.800]  Well, I know this is there's no judges in America.
[01:50:42.800 --> 01:50:45.320]  They're just law administrators.
[01:50:45.320 --> 01:50:46.320]  Okay.
[01:50:46.320 --> 01:50:48.880]  Well, congratulations.
[01:50:48.880 --> 01:50:57.480]  So far tonight, you have known everything and produced nothing with it.
[01:50:57.480 --> 01:51:04.080]  I have tried to instruct you on how to be productive, but you already know everything.
[01:51:04.080 --> 01:51:07.320]  No, I don't know everything.
[01:51:07.320 --> 01:51:13.480]  Then why can't you answer simple damn questions based upon what we are discussing instead
[01:51:13.480 --> 01:51:19.560]  of running off on these damn sunflake tangents off in the left field?
[01:51:19.560 --> 01:51:23.840]  You're avoiding the issues I'm putting in front of you because you don't have an answer
[01:51:23.840 --> 01:51:27.040]  and you don't have an answer because you haven't read.
[01:51:27.040 --> 01:51:32.000]  You haven't read because you don't want to make the effort.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:36.000]  There can't be any other reason because you've had more than enough time to do this since
[01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:38.920]  this all began.
[01:51:38.920 --> 01:51:42.440]  So if you really wanted to know, you had the time to find out.
[01:51:42.440 --> 01:51:46.560]  If you really wanted to understand how to do this, you would have learned something
[01:51:46.560 --> 01:51:54.600]  by now, if not from this show, from at least reading something.
[01:51:54.600 --> 01:51:59.600]  But as often as you say you listen to this show and listen to the archives, I fail to
[01:51:59.600 --> 01:52:07.640]  see how you could not have come across something that told you where to start and how to proceed.
[01:52:07.640 --> 01:52:13.520]  I find that very difficult to believe.
[01:52:13.520 --> 01:52:16.760]  Now I want to find out where the case law is, what you're saying.
[01:52:16.760 --> 01:52:19.560]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:52:19.560 --> 01:52:23.400]  How in the hell did we get the case law from what I'm talking about?
[01:52:23.400 --> 01:52:26.280]  How did we even get there?
[01:52:26.280 --> 01:52:30.960]  I'm talking about how you refuse to do the work necessary to put this together in a way
[01:52:30.960 --> 01:52:36.560]  you can use it properly and you go to case law from where?
[01:52:36.560 --> 01:52:48.200]  What ski slope are you slaloming off of over there all by yourself?
[01:52:48.200 --> 01:52:54.680]  I assume that you go to the library and get all the information from reading through the
[01:52:54.680 --> 01:53:00.360]  whole statutes and then- Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:53:00.360 --> 01:53:01.360]  All right.
[01:53:01.360 --> 01:53:02.360]  I'll tell you what I'm going to do.
[01:53:02.360 --> 01:53:06.560]  I got just under six minutes left in this show, Raider.
[01:53:06.560 --> 01:53:10.360]  Are you listening to me on something other than this telephone line?
[01:53:10.360 --> 01:53:11.360]  No.
[01:53:11.360 --> 01:53:12.360]  Okay.
[01:53:12.360 --> 01:53:17.280]  Then I'm going to mute you and I'm going to talk until the end of the show and I'm going
[01:53:17.280 --> 01:53:20.760]  to lay out some steps for you to follow.
[01:53:20.760 --> 01:53:26.400]  If you fail to follow them, I don't want to hear a cricket chirp out of you on this show
[01:53:26.400 --> 01:53:33.260]  ever again about this case because you're not doing your job.
[01:53:33.260 --> 01:53:34.920]  We have an agreement?
[01:53:34.920 --> 01:53:35.920]  Yep.
[01:53:35.920 --> 01:53:37.440]  All right.
[01:53:37.440 --> 01:53:38.440]  Sit down and listen in.
[01:53:38.440 --> 01:53:39.440]  Okay.
[01:53:39.440 --> 01:53:40.440]  All right.
[01:53:40.440 --> 01:53:48.640]  First and foremost, find the original bill that created the code you're reading.
[01:53:48.640 --> 01:53:55.600]  What is the caption of the bill that says what the bill is for?
[01:53:55.600 --> 01:54:03.440]  Second, what state constitution was this bill required to be created under?
[01:54:03.440 --> 01:54:11.320]  How does the creation of this bill disagree with, violate, or comply with the constitutional
[01:54:11.320 --> 01:54:17.440]  requirements for its creation and its survival?
[01:54:17.440 --> 01:54:25.560]  If the subject matter of the bill is an umbrella-regulable subject like it is here in Texas, let's say
[01:54:25.560 --> 01:54:36.960]  transportation, or on a really good day, it might say commercial transportation or commercial
[01:54:36.960 --> 01:54:44.120]  application of the highways or commercial usage of motor vehicles or anything that might
[01:54:44.120 --> 01:54:49.400]  lend credence to your statements and argument that the court might actually have to pay
[01:54:49.400 --> 01:54:59.320]  attention to, and you get certified copies of all of those things, the constitutional
[01:54:59.320 --> 01:55:06.840]  provisions that support your argument, the pages of the bill that support your argument
[01:55:06.840 --> 01:55:12.240]  about what it applies to and therefore how the statutes beneath it are required to be
[01:55:12.240 --> 01:55:20.640]  applied, what type of alleged defense is it supposed to be or violation or infraction
[01:55:20.640 --> 01:55:27.640]  and are violations and infractions considered crimes or are they civil, etc., etc., etc.,
[01:55:27.640 --> 01:55:33.800]  which goes to criminal procedure.
[01:55:33.800 --> 01:55:41.240]  You need to understand the rules of evidence so you'll know how to submit these copies,
[01:55:41.240 --> 01:55:46.200]  and then you need to understand how motions are written in the area where you're filing
[01:55:46.200 --> 01:55:52.960]  them so that you can write a proper motion submitting this information to challenge the
[01:55:52.960 --> 01:56:00.120]  jurisdiction of the court both on subject matter and in personam because the statute
[01:56:00.120 --> 01:56:09.600]  only applies to commerce and your evidence is the bill that enacted it.
[01:56:09.600 --> 01:56:17.080]  You do not, under any circumstances, argue the definition of terms that the statute creates
[01:56:17.080 --> 01:56:24.360]  on its own unless those definitions specifically contain the language you are wanting to get
[01:56:24.360 --> 01:56:27.000]  the court to abide by.
[01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:33.600]  You cannot presume the definition applies only to commerce unless the definition or
[01:56:33.600 --> 01:56:39.140]  the section or the context it's in says it applies to commerce.
[01:56:39.140 --> 01:56:45.280]  And for that, you need to know the subject matter of the bill.
[01:56:45.280 --> 01:56:48.360]  This is the same process I went through here in Texas.
[01:56:48.360 --> 01:56:53.760]  This is the process you're going to go through no matter where you are.
[01:56:53.760 --> 01:57:02.320]  And if you fail or refuse to do any of those things, you will fail in defending your case.
[01:57:02.320 --> 01:57:04.520]  You will lose money.
[01:57:04.520 --> 01:57:12.760]  You will go to jail in some states depending upon the type of charge against you.
[01:57:12.760 --> 01:57:19.160]  How well you do at this is based on how much effort you're willing to put into doing it
[01:57:19.160 --> 01:57:22.000]  right.
[01:57:22.000 --> 01:57:25.400]  Stop presuming anything.
[01:57:25.400 --> 01:57:30.500]  In relation to this case, don't even presume your own damned name.
[01:57:30.500 --> 01:57:39.000]  Go back and look at the proper documents that tell you who you are because presumption is
[01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:45.400]  killing you because you make them and they make them.
[01:57:45.400 --> 01:57:49.840]  And two presumptions don't make a fact.
[01:57:49.840 --> 01:57:56.040]  All right, that is the end of the Rule of Law Radio Monday night show.
[01:57:56.040 --> 01:58:00.600]  I hope everybody got something useful out of this, including Truth Raider.
[01:58:00.600 --> 01:58:03.760]  All right, folks, I hope you all have a great and blessed week.
[01:58:03.760 --> 01:58:05.200]  I want to thank you all for listening.
[01:58:05.200 --> 01:58:09.120]  I want to thank you all for the donations and the contributions and the prayers and
[01:58:09.120 --> 01:58:12.000]  the support, the call-ins.
[01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:13.400]  Just please keep it up.
[01:58:13.400 --> 01:58:14.640]  Please keep us going.
[01:58:14.640 --> 01:58:19.720]  Please support us both financially and morally.
[01:58:19.720 --> 01:58:23.280]  Call us, email us, let us know what kind of job you think we're doing.
[01:58:23.280 --> 01:58:28.440]  And folks, remember, I need your financial help to make this lawsuit a success from beginning
[01:58:28.440 --> 01:58:29.440]  to end.
[01:58:29.440 --> 01:58:35.840]  So, please go make a donation on the Rule of Law Radio website to Eddie and just put
[01:58:35.840 --> 01:58:38.760]  on their legal fund or whatever.
[01:58:38.760 --> 01:58:39.760]  That's where it'll go.
[01:58:39.760 --> 01:58:40.760]  That's how it'll be used.
[01:58:40.760 --> 01:58:43.240]  All right, folks, you all have a great week.
[01:58:43.240 --> 01:58:50.600]  Good night and God bless.
[01:58:50.600 --> 01:58:56.680]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.680 --> 01:58:57.880]  Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.880 --> 01:59:02.840]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:02.840 --> 01:59:08.520]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.520 --> 01:59:11.800]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.800 --> 01:59:20.760]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.760 --> 01:59:26.440]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:26.440 --> 01:59:30.320]  charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.320 --> 01:59:32.840]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.840 --> 01:59:41.240]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.240 --> 01:59:51.920]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.920 --> 01:59:52.920]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.920 --> 02:00:12.920]  You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.