[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  Following these flashes brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your jelly bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:16.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:16.000 --> 00:37.000]  Markets for the 23rd of November, 2015 opened up with gold at $1,067.60 an ounce, silver $14.08 an ounce, Texas crude $40.39 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $324 U.S. currency.
[00:37.000 --> 00:50.000]  Today in history, Tuesday, November 23rd, 1971, the People's Republic of China is officially seated in the U.N. Security Council.
[00:50.000 --> 00:59.000]  Resolution 2758 recognized the PRC and stripped the former Republic of China's membership to the Security Council.
[00:59.000 --> 01:12.000]  In recent news, New Yorkers and visitors to the city have a new and easy to use anti-terrorism app, which makes reporting suspicious activity on their smartphones as easy as sending a text.
[01:12.000 --> 01:18.000]  The initiative, See Something, Send Something, encourages New Yorkers to alert the authorities of suspicious activities.
[01:18.000 --> 01:24.000]  Users can simply send a photo of whatever it seems that they are concerned about, or just simply send a text.
[01:24.000 --> 01:31.000]  The Metropolitan Transportation Authority will be hiring 46 new officers trained in the counterterrorism to deal with the influx of information.
[01:31.000 --> 01:38.000]  New York City has been on increased alerts, and supporters of the Islamic State group claim responsibility for the attacks in Paris, France earlier this month.
[01:38.000 --> 01:43.000]  ISIS Militants released a video last week mentioning New York City as a potential future target.
[01:49.000 --> 01:52.000]  The Federal Aviation Administration released its proposed drone regulations today.
[01:52.000 --> 01:56.000]  The recommendations came from a task force created by the agency.
[01:56.000 --> 02:01.000]  They are calling for all drones half a pound to 55 pounds to be registered into a federal database.
[02:01.000 --> 02:07.000]  They are demanding that all drone owners display their government issued registration number on the machines themselves as well,
[02:07.000 --> 02:13.000]  recommending that owners submit their names and addresses, or at the very least the option of email and phone numbers.
[02:13.000 --> 02:18.000]  All the fuss is to ensure accountability by creating a traceable link between aircraft and owner,
[02:18.000 --> 02:25.000]  and to encourage the maximum levels of regulatory compliance by making the registration process as simple as possible.
[02:25.000 --> 02:31.000]  The FAA is looking to get these new regulations in by the holidays since Consumer Technology Association,
[02:31.000 --> 02:37.000]  a trade group, has estimated that roughly 400,000 drones are expected to be sold this holiday season.
[02:41.000 --> 02:46.000]  The Low Star Lowdown has been looking for new headquarters. Our apologies for missing the scoop as of late.
[02:46.000 --> 02:50.000]  We'll be back next week. Your thoughts and prayers are appreciated.
[02:50.000 --> 03:17.000]  This has been your Lowdown for November 23, 2015.
[03:20.000 --> 03:28.000]  Somebody's been shot, somebody's been fused, somebody blew up a building, somebody stole a car,
[03:28.000 --> 03:38.000]  somebody got away, somebody didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far.
[03:38.000 --> 03:51.000]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day, son, a man had to answer for the ways that he'd done, take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree,
[03:51.000 --> 04:01.000]  round up all of them bad boys in the highest street, for all the people we see.
[04:01.000 --> 04:09.000]  That justice is one thing you should always find, you've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line.
[04:09.000 --> 04:17.000]  When the gun smoke settles, we'll sing a victory tune, and we'll all meet back at the horse's nose.
[04:17.000 --> 04:29.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing, Westgate for my men, bear for my horses.
[04:29.000 --> 04:36.000]  All right, folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:36.000 --> 04:44.000]  All right. Tonight, before I get into taking calls, there are some things I need to get into that most of you are going to need to be aware of
[04:44.000 --> 04:48.000]  if you start any type of proceeding in any of these courts.
[04:48.000 --> 05:01.000]  And because you are not aware of this, the judges you face are going to get away with depriving you of far too many due process rights.
[05:01.000 --> 05:08.000]  What I'm talking about here is how to disqualify a judge.
[05:08.000 --> 05:20.000]  Now, in every state and federal level, there is this set of rules called the judicial canons, which you will find in the Code of Judicial Conduct.
[05:20.000 --> 05:26.000]  The judges are required to abide by these canons.
[05:26.000 --> 05:47.000]  The problem is any deviation by a judge from these canons or any violation by a judge of these canons is investigated and overseen by their fellow judges.
[05:47.000 --> 06:02.000]  In other words, like most other parts of the system that we have, there is nothing publicly transparent or accountable in any of it.
[06:02.000 --> 06:06.000]  Let me give you an example of what I mean by that.
[06:06.000 --> 06:17.000]  Now, I have the State Commission on Judicial Conduct's Fiscal Year 2014 report here in front of me.
[06:17.000 --> 06:37.000]  And let me give you a few numbers just to give you an idea of how worthless an organization this is in relation to the protection of the people's rights and bad judges.
[06:37.000 --> 06:43.000]  Now, I'm going to read you what's in their Table 1 on this commission activity.
[06:43.000 --> 06:53.000]  In Fiscal Year 2014, they show that they had cases pending at the beginning and ending of the fiscal year.
[06:53.000 --> 06:58.000]  They had 584 beginning and 636 ending.
[06:58.000 --> 07:07.000]  Now, that's how many they had before the fiscal year began and how many they had left after the fiscal year was over.
[07:07.000 --> 07:17.000]  The cases filed during the fiscal year of 2014 was 1,136.
[07:17.000 --> 07:29.000]  Total number of cases disposed of out of that 1,136 were 1,075, a 94.63% ratio.
[07:29.000 --> 07:42.000]  The average age of a case of that 1,136 is 5.37 months.
[07:42.000 --> 08:09.000]  Disciplinary action total out of 1,075 cases for Fiscal Year 2014 was 61, 61 out of 1,075.
[08:09.000 --> 08:18.000]  Now, if you're sitting out there with a calculator, you should real quick be able to see that something here ain't quite right.
[08:18.000 --> 08:20.000]  I mean, let's think about that, shall we?
[08:20.000 --> 08:24.000]  You got 1,075 of these things.
[08:24.000 --> 08:28.000]  What's the percentage of that for 61?
[08:28.000 --> 08:30.000]  I mean, come on.
[08:30.000 --> 08:33.000]  That is ridiculously low.
[08:33.000 --> 08:43.000]  By any standard, that is ridiculously low, especially if you've ever faced one of these judges in one of these courts.
[08:43.000 --> 09:03.000]  Let's see, that is a 5.67% disciplinary action.
[09:03.000 --> 09:10.000]  Now, let me tell you how the discipline was administered across those 61 cases.
[09:10.000 --> 09:25.000]  There were zero criminal convictions, though I have personally witnessed judges commit felonies on that bench and outside of that bench using their official capacity.
[09:25.000 --> 09:28.000]  I've seen it with my own eyes.
[09:28.000 --> 09:32.000]  Zero criminal convictions.
[09:32.000 --> 09:36.000]  Review Tribunal Order, zero.
[09:36.000 --> 09:41.000]  Voluntary agreement to resign in lieu of disciplinary action.
[09:41.000 --> 09:46.000]  Out of 61, there were six.
[09:46.000 --> 09:50.000]  Public censure, zero.
[09:50.000 --> 09:56.000]  Public censure and Order of Additional Education, zero.
[09:56.000 --> 10:01.000]  Public reprimand, eight out of 61.
[10:01.000 --> 10:06.000]  Public warning, two out of 61.
[10:06.000 --> 10:11.000]  Public admonition, one out of 61.
[10:11.000 --> 10:17.000]  Public sanction and Order of Additional Education, three.
[10:17.000 --> 10:21.000]  Private reprimand, two.
[10:21.000 --> 10:24.000]  Private warning, four.
[10:24.000 --> 10:27.000]  Private admonition, 12.
[10:27.000 --> 10:32.000]  Private sanction and Order of Additional Education, 15.
[10:32.000 --> 10:37.000]  Public Order of Additional Education, zero.
[10:37.000 --> 10:42.000]  Private Order of Additional Education, five.
[10:42.000 --> 10:50.000]  Interim disciplinary action, what they did while the investigation into the accusation was ongoing.
[10:50.000 --> 10:55.000]  Order of suspension, three.
[10:55.000 --> 11:00.000]  Recommendation of suspension to Supreme Court, zero.
[11:00.000 --> 11:05.000]  Cases in formal proceeding, zero.
[11:05.000 --> 11:09.000]  Amicus referral, zero.
[11:09.000 --> 11:14.000]  Dismissals, 1,016.
[11:14.000 --> 11:22.000]  Request for reconsideration of that 1,016 that were received, 67.
[11:22.000 --> 11:26.000]  Reconsideration granted, two.
[11:26.000 --> 11:30.000]  Reconsideration denied, 60.
[11:30.000 --> 11:34.000]  Pending, five.
[11:34.000 --> 11:39.000]  Cases appealed to special court of review, zero.
[11:39.000 --> 11:43.000]  Informal hearing set, 14.
[11:43.000 --> 11:48.000]  Public statements issued, zero.
[11:48.000 --> 11:57.000]  In other words, we appreciate your complaints, but they're one of us, so suck it up and do without.
[11:57.000 --> 12:01.000]  You have no remedy.
[12:01.000 --> 12:13.000]  Notice that no time out of those 1,075 complaints were there any serious repercussions to any judge.
[12:13.000 --> 12:25.000]  Now remember, one of these judges was caught colluding with a prosecutor in text messages
[12:25.000 --> 12:37.000]  to deprive defendants of their impartial right to a fair and impartial trial and an unbiased judge.
[12:37.000 --> 12:41.000]  No criminal proceedings against that judge.
[12:41.000 --> 12:54.000]  In fact, that was one of those judges that was allowed to resign rather than suffer any penalty whatsoever.
[12:54.000 --> 13:13.000]  Since when has it ever been a good idea to allow the convicts to determine which convicts get to stay in jail or should even be punished?
[13:13.000 --> 13:25.000]  Because you will never find, in my personal opinion, a more egotistical, megalomaniacal individual than a justice or municipal judge
[13:25.000 --> 13:33.000]  that thinks they're untouchable, that thinks they can do as they please in their little domain.
[13:33.000 --> 13:43.000]  They are more arrogant than a county court-at-law or district judge on average.
[13:43.000 --> 13:50.000]  The only ones I know that surpass them are federal judges.
[13:50.000 --> 13:58.000]  And we allow this to continue as if we really have a choice, because let's look at how we got here.
[13:58.000 --> 14:03.000]  Who is responsible for setting up the judicial commission? The legislature.
[14:03.000 --> 14:08.000]  Who currently controls the legislature? Attorneys. How do we know this?
[14:08.000 --> 14:16.000]  All you got to do is go down to the register office and get a list of the occupations of all current House and Senate representatives,
[14:16.000 --> 14:24.000]  and it will give you exactly what their occupation is, even while they're serving in the legislature.
[14:24.000 --> 14:33.000]  Now, let's not even examine the fact that an attorney serving as a legislator with an active bar card is, in fact,
[14:33.000 --> 14:42.000]  a de facto judicial officer under the State Bar Act, but they are in violation of the separation of powers
[14:42.000 --> 14:49.000]  by serving in the legislature to begin with, because they're a judicial officer.
[14:49.000 --> 14:55.000]  They have no business being in the legislature. They have no business being governor.
[14:55.000 --> 15:05.000]  They have no business being attorney general. In fact, they are constitutionally prohibited from all of the above.
[15:05.000 --> 15:12.000]  And yet, who interprets that constitutional provision to allow this to continue?
[15:12.000 --> 15:22.000]  The courts, which is also controlled by attorneys.
[15:22.000 --> 15:31.000]  Do you begin to see the problem with the self-policing system?
[15:31.000 --> 15:45.000]  It doesn't work in the police departments. Why in the world would we even begin to think that it would work in any of the upper departments of government?
[15:45.000 --> 15:57.000]  There should be no system of review that allows anyone that is subject to that review to sit in the body doing the reviewing.
[15:57.000 --> 16:04.000]  But let's look at the composition of the Judicial Commission here in Texas.
[16:04.000 --> 16:23.000]  Five judges, five civilians appointed by the governor, not chosen randomly, not picked out of the blue, handpicked by the governor, and three attorneys.
[16:23.000 --> 16:36.000]  So no matter what happens on this complaint, it will always be a vote of eight to five to protect the judge.
[16:36.000 --> 16:41.000]  You get it yet?
[16:41.000 --> 16:48.000]  Our problems are just beginning, and my explanation of those problems shall continue after this break, so y'all hang in there.
[16:48.000 --> 17:00.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. Your host, Eddie Craig, will be back in just a moment.
[17:00.000 --> 17:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.000 --> 17:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.000 --> 17:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.000 --> 17:25.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.000 --> 17:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:31.000 --> 17:39.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.000 --> 17:47.000]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:47.000 --> 17:51.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.000 --> 17:58.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:58.000 --> 18:00.000]  Order now.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:50.000]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:01.000]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:11.000 --> 19:32.000]  Look what we got, we are the Christians, no wonder why they don't have answers.
[19:32.000 --> 19:44.000]  We are the Christians, look what we got, how they don't have answers.
[19:44.000 --> 19:49.000]  I can't go to church to see, Lord, how they want with them if it's easy.
[19:49.000 --> 19:54.000]  They make that way too politically, and then they get mad and angry.
[19:54.000 --> 19:59.000]  But they're not standing up and fight and fight, so they free them and be free.
[19:59.000 --> 20:02.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[20:02.000 --> 20:06.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig.
[20:06.000 --> 20:23.000]  All right, now that we know why the Judicial Conduct Committee is totally incapable of providing us with any remedy in relation to bad judges,
[20:23.000 --> 20:31.000]  we now need to see what these canons that they're supposed to be upholding actually require of them.
[20:31.000 --> 20:40.000]  Now, there's only eight actual canons, and then some of these canons are broken into several subparts.
[20:40.000 --> 20:45.000]  And the canons in Texas mirror the federal canons.
[20:45.000 --> 20:52.000]  But I'm going to go through these real quick and show you exactly how this is supposed to work.
[20:52.000 --> 20:56.000]  Now, the purpose of this, according to the way it starts out in the preamble,
[20:56.000 --> 21:03.000]  in summary is the judiciary is to strive to maintain the dignity appropriate to the judicial office,
[21:03.000 --> 21:07.000]  and that judges should be held to a higher standard.
[21:07.000 --> 21:11.000]  Well, neither of those are true.
[21:11.000 --> 21:15.000]  If you don't believe that, go watch these judges.
[21:15.000 --> 21:23.000]  Earing boy down here, Jenkins, Alfred Jenkins in the Austin Municipal Court, is one of the most vain,
[21:23.000 --> 21:32.000]  egotistical, inept individuals I have ever seen disgrace a robe.
[21:32.000 --> 21:40.000]  He is utterly incompetent in every conceivable way.
[21:40.000 --> 21:47.000]  And he acts like a clown on that bench.
[21:47.000 --> 21:53.000]  Now, that's just one of more than a dozen that are in the Austin Municipal Court,
[21:53.000 --> 21:57.000]  and they all have different methods of how they do things.
[21:57.000 --> 22:03.000]  But the one thing they all have in common, none of them do it right.
[22:03.000 --> 22:06.000]  None of them do it in compliance with law.
[22:06.000 --> 22:13.000]  None of them do it to ensure that justice is done and the rights of the accused are protected
[22:13.000 --> 22:17.000]  and that both sides are treated fairly.
[22:17.000 --> 22:22.000]  Not a single one.
[22:22.000 --> 22:29.000]  Under Canon 1, in short, judges shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
[22:29.000 --> 22:31.000]  That's the canon.
[22:31.000 --> 22:36.000]  And the basic premise of that is no favoritism.
[22:36.000 --> 22:44.000]  No activities that would look like it would prejudice you against any party or parties appearing before you.
[22:44.000 --> 22:45.000]  Okay?
[22:45.000 --> 22:56.000]  When a judge is violating this canon, they do it when they act outside of proper procedure.
[22:56.000 --> 22:59.000]  They act in violation of law.
[22:59.000 --> 23:07.000]  They act in violation of the rights of either party in the case.
[23:07.000 --> 23:15.000]  Those are all actions that disqualify them under Canon 1.
[23:15.000 --> 23:16.000]  Okay?
[23:16.000 --> 23:21.000]  Canon 2, judges shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.
[23:21.000 --> 23:22.000]  Well, let's see.
[23:22.000 --> 23:30.000]  We had a district attorney that was charged with DUI.
[23:30.000 --> 23:34.000]  We had a district judge that was charged with DUI.
[23:34.000 --> 23:43.000]  Those are the kind of things that are not an avoidance of impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.
[23:43.000 --> 23:49.000]  Now, whether or not the judge was actually impaired, I have no way of knowing that.
[23:49.000 --> 23:58.000]  No one had got a video of her that I'm aware of like they did Lemke or Lindbergh or whatever the heck her name is.
[23:58.000 --> 24:01.000]  The cantaloupe with the bad hairdo, okay?
[24:01.000 --> 24:11.000]  That's acting as the district attorney and retaliated against Perry as governor for trying to get her kicked out of her job
[24:11.000 --> 24:15.000]  and threatened to withhold funding if she didn't resign.
[24:15.000 --> 24:20.000]  Now, he's within his rights to do that and he should have just done it.
[24:20.000 --> 24:21.000]  He shouldn't have said anything.
[24:21.000 --> 24:28.000]  He should have just done it because now they're trying to prosecute him and a judge said that they could.
[24:28.000 --> 24:30.000]  See, there we go with those judges again.
[24:30.000 --> 24:37.000]  Remember, the governor is not nearly as in bed with the judges as the district attorney is.
[24:37.000 --> 24:48.000]  So even though Lindbergh doesn't spend any real time in jail and suffer any real punishment for her gross inebriation
[24:48.000 --> 25:00.000]  and her assault on officers in the jail, all of which was video recorded and audio recorded and publicly viewable
[25:00.000 --> 25:04.000]  because the governor thought she was a bad example of a public servant,
[25:04.000 --> 25:08.000]  he's going to get punished for telling her you don't deserve to be in that job
[25:08.000 --> 25:13.000]  and I'm not going to fund the position until you get out of it,
[25:13.000 --> 25:21.000]  which he has every constitutional duty and right to do under his office.
[25:21.000 --> 25:28.000]  It would be one thing if he was using that authority to influence the outcome of a case
[25:28.000 --> 25:35.000]  that she was presiding or prosecuting or to get it thrown out so that she wouldn't prosecute it.
[25:35.000 --> 25:38.000]  No, that's not what he was doing.
[25:38.000 --> 25:43.000]  He was saying you're a disgrace to the job.
[25:43.000 --> 25:51.000]  Get out or I'm going to not fund your office because you have no reason to be there.
[25:51.000 --> 25:53.000]  You have no right to be there.
[25:53.000 --> 26:02.000]  You gave that right up when you violated the public trust, as most of them do day in and day out.
[26:02.000 --> 26:10.000]  But instead, her partners in crime, the judges, have now made it possible for them to turn the tables
[26:10.000 --> 26:15.000]  and go after Rick Perry for abuse of his authority.
[26:15.000 --> 26:19.000]  Go figure.
[26:19.000 --> 26:28.000]  Now, a judge violates Canon 2, all right, when they demonstrate any form of impropriety
[26:28.000 --> 26:31.000]  or the appearance they're of.
[26:31.000 --> 26:34.000]  When they go out and do something like that, get a DUI.
[26:34.000 --> 26:40.000]  When they go out and try to get the people or employees under threat of their office
[26:40.000 --> 26:43.000]  or something to get them to do something they're not obligated to do
[26:43.000 --> 26:46.000]  or that the judge has no power to make them do
[26:46.000 --> 26:54.000]  or the judge acts in a manner that deprives us of the faith and reliability of the judiciary,
[26:54.000 --> 26:57.000]  that's a violation of Canon 2.
[26:57.000 --> 27:02.000]  Now, Canon 2A, judges shall respect to comply with the law.
[27:02.000 --> 27:04.000]  Not happening.
[27:04.000 --> 27:13.000]  Texas judges at every level do their damnedest to rewrite the law to suit the outcome they want in any given case.
[27:13.000 --> 27:18.000]  I've read the opinions, I've watched them do it in real time.
[27:18.000 --> 27:25.000]  They just do as they please, regardless of the law.
[27:25.000 --> 27:30.000]  They promote public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary.
[27:30.000 --> 27:39.000]  You would have to be in a damned coma to think they promote public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary.
[27:39.000 --> 27:45.000]  And the next one, public confidence in the impartiality, again, induced coma,
[27:45.000 --> 27:49.000]  because that's the only way you're going to get there.
[27:49.000 --> 27:55.000]  When they don't comply with the law, when they don't comply with proper criminal or civil procedure,
[27:55.000 --> 27:59.000]  when they act in a manner outside of their lawful authority,
[27:59.000 --> 28:03.000]  all of that is a violation of Canon 2A.
[28:03.000 --> 28:07.000]  They know it, they don't care.
[28:07.000 --> 28:14.000]  So again, this is the problem with having the fox guard the henhouse.
[28:14.000 --> 28:20.000]  Canon 3, judges shall perform the duties of their office impartially and diligently.
[28:20.000 --> 28:28.000]  Not going to happen, because once again, under Canon 3, they are required to be faithful to the law.
[28:28.000 --> 28:30.000]  And none of them even know the law.
[28:30.000 --> 28:32.000]  So how can they be faithful to it?
[28:32.000 --> 28:40.000]  When the judge violates that law, he violates 3B2 of Canon 3.
[28:40.000 --> 28:46.000]  All right, 3B5, judges shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice.
[28:46.000 --> 28:52.000]  Again, watch them day in and day out rule against the accused, deny their pleadings,
[28:52.000 --> 28:58.000]  and yet there is not one word spoken, not one written rebuttal made,
[28:58.000 --> 29:03.000]  and not a single document filed by the prosecutor in the case that A,
[29:03.000 --> 29:09.000]  invokes the jurisdiction of the court, B, identifies who is representing the state in the prosecution
[29:09.000 --> 29:14.000]  so that all parties are known in the matter, okay?
[29:14.000 --> 29:20.000]  And three, well, I could just make a bigger list, but why bother?
[29:20.000 --> 29:25.000]  None of them do what they're supposed to do, none of them.
[29:25.000 --> 29:31.000]  And the judges and the city attorneys or the county attorneys or the district attorneys
[29:31.000 --> 29:38.000]  all act in concert and collusion to misrepresent the law to the public that's appearing in that court
[29:38.000 --> 29:41.000]  so as to put them at a legal disadvantage.
[29:41.000 --> 29:45.000]  And I want to show you how that works when I get done with a few more of these,
[29:45.000 --> 29:49.000]  because I'm going to go into a motion for disqualification that I'm working on right now
[29:49.000 --> 29:52.000]  for some judges in San Antonio.
[29:52.000 --> 29:55.000]  And believe me, I don't pull any punches.
[29:55.000 --> 30:00.000]  So y'all hang on and we'll cover it when we get back.
[30:00.000 --> 30:02.000]  My resolve is weak.
[30:02.000 --> 30:03.000]  It needs a solution.
[30:03.000 --> 30:06.000]  Now research has a new contribution.
[30:06.000 --> 30:11.000]  A few simple changes, a small evolution will help you to keep your next resolution.
[30:11.000 --> 30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht with some tips on improving your willpower next.
[30:16.000 --> 30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.000 --> 30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.000 --> 30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:26.000 --> 30:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.000 --> 30:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:34.000 --> 30:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:37.000 --> 30:41.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.000 --> 30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.000 --> 30:46.000]  Willpower.
[30:46.000 --> 30:50.000]  If we had enough of it, we could conquer the world, earn that big promotion,
[30:50.000 --> 30:53.000]  stay away from gooey cupcakes, and always do the right thing.
[30:53.000 --> 30:56.000]  Too bad we don't always stay the course.
[30:56.000 --> 30:59.000]  But willpower may be about more than just saying no to things.
[30:59.000 --> 31:05.000]  According to a new book, self-control is directly linked to how much sugar and sleep we get.
[31:05.000 --> 31:09.000]  Amazingly, that means the best way to increase your willpower for a tough challenge
[31:09.000 --> 31:13.000]  is to get more sleep and say yes to sugar.
[31:13.000 --> 31:15.000]  The key is not to overdo either one.
[31:15.000 --> 31:20.000]  So now I'm set to take on the world with a tasty snack and a power nap.
[31:20.000 --> 31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.000 --> 31:32.000]  What are you thinking?
[31:32.000 --> 31:38.000]  Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month.
[31:38.000 --> 31:44.000]  If USA.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys,
[31:44.000 --> 31:48.000]  liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever,
[31:48.000 --> 31:52.000]  it alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products,
[31:52.000 --> 31:55.000]  that saves you space, time, and money.
[31:55.000 --> 31:57.000]  Call 888-910-4367.
[31:57.000 --> 32:02.000]  Only at nsa.org.
[32:02.000 --> 32:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.000 --> 32:07.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[32:07.000 --> 32:10.000]  and if we the people are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:15.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:15.000 --> 32:17.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:17.000 --> 32:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:22.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:22.000 --> 32:25.000]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.000 --> 32:28.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:28.000 --> 32:31.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:31.000 --> 32:33.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:33.000 --> 32:35.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.000 --> 32:39.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[32:39.000 --> 32:41.000]  and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:43.000 --> 32:45.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.000 --> 32:48.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:12.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve.
[33:12.000 --> 33:25.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I'm going to solve them through the help of government them, prosecute them.
[33:25.000 --> 33:29.000]  Okay.
[33:29.000 --> 33:32.000]  All set.
[33:32.000 --> 33:52.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[33:52.000 --> 33:54.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:54.000 --> 33:55.000]  All right.
[33:55.000 --> 33:59.000]  Let's get through a couple more of these and I'm going to read you in part
[33:59.000 --> 34:03.000]  this disqualification motion I'm working on right now for this case.
[34:03.000 --> 34:10.000]  Now, Canon 3B7, judges shall accord to every person the right to be heard according to law.
[34:10.000 --> 34:13.000]  Judges shall not initiate or consider ex parte communications.
[34:13.000 --> 34:22.000]  I have witnessed judges fail at both of these numerous times in every level of court we have.
[34:22.000 --> 34:26.000]  For instance, in the Tom Delay case when I went downtown with Randy,
[34:26.000 --> 34:33.000]  they had an indictment handed down for delay and were gathering up a jury to prosecute him with,
[34:33.000 --> 34:39.000]  yet no one had ever filed a criminal complaint against the man.
[34:39.000 --> 34:43.000]  And the Code of Criminal Procedure makes it absolutely clear
[34:43.000 --> 34:48.000]  that no indictment or information is valid without a sworn complaint.
[34:48.000 --> 34:56.000]  And the district judge, instead of adhering to the law, threw Randy out of court.
[34:56.000 --> 34:59.000]  Not just court, but the courthouse.
[34:59.000 --> 35:01.000]  Okay.
[35:01.000 --> 35:11.000]  This is how arrogant these people are when they are reviewed by their own kind.
[35:11.000 --> 35:14.000]  Or I should say ilk.
[35:14.000 --> 35:18.000]  Okay, because it's just like the good cop, bad cop.
[35:18.000 --> 35:20.000]  There is no such thing.
[35:20.000 --> 35:27.000]  Because there are no good cops if all cops are willing to commit the same acts for the same reasons
[35:27.000 --> 35:30.000]  in order to collect a paycheck.
[35:30.000 --> 35:37.000]  Or to at least turn their head away from the action of those that are willing to do so,
[35:37.000 --> 35:43.000]  rather than prevent them from doing so as they're required to do.
[35:43.000 --> 35:49.000]  So if you sign on willing to enforce any law,
[35:49.000 --> 35:58.000]  regardless of how repugnant to of individual rights or morally wrong or reprehensible that law might be,
[35:58.000 --> 36:03.000]  or you're unwilling to hold accountable another officer who will do so,
[36:03.000 --> 36:06.000]  you cannot call yourself a good cop.
[36:06.000 --> 36:09.000]  And you can't do it anymore as a judge than you can as a cop
[36:09.000 --> 36:18.000]  when you sit and watch the same crap happen every day and you allow it to continue.
[36:18.000 --> 36:20.000]  It's that simple.
[36:20.000 --> 36:26.000]  Canon 3B8, judges shall dispose of all judicial matters fairly, promptly, and efficiently.
[36:26.000 --> 36:32.000]  Oh, well, they got the last two down, promptly and efficiently.
[36:32.000 --> 36:37.000]  The fairly is nowhere to be found.
[36:37.000 --> 36:46.000]  When you go into court and you are the only one that is speaking and yet nothing is being heard
[36:46.000 --> 36:55.000]  and everything that you bring to the table is being denied without any rebuttal or factual evidence
[36:55.000 --> 37:02.000]  proving it incorrect and yet you still can't win,
[37:02.000 --> 37:09.000]  well, where is fair and impartial in any of that?
[37:09.000 --> 37:11.000]  See the problem?
[37:11.000 --> 37:16.000]  Canon 3D1, judges who receive information indicating a substantial likelihood
[37:16.000 --> 37:21.000]  that another judge has committed a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct should take appropriate action.
[37:21.000 --> 37:24.000]  Half that chance.
[37:24.000 --> 37:29.000]  You report one of these presiding judges down here at the Austin Municipal Court
[37:29.000 --> 37:36.000]  or the San Antonio Municipal Court to the head administrative judge and all you get is moot.
[37:36.000 --> 37:40.000]  The judge that caused the problem, no repercussions.
[37:40.000 --> 37:47.000]  In fact, the only judge that I've seen suffer any sort of repercussion down there whatsoever
[37:47.000 --> 37:57.000]  was one that absolutely deserved it and absolutely deserved it to be a thousand times more painful than it was
[37:57.000 --> 38:05.000]  was Susan Statman, who is now the head presiding judge over all the other judges down there
[38:05.000 --> 38:11.000]  and who is one of the utmost at being incompetent in the law
[38:11.000 --> 38:18.000]  and one of the most arrogant at assuming she knows everything and how it works.
[38:18.000 --> 38:22.000]  She is...
[38:22.000 --> 38:33.000]  In any case, what she did was she banned all media personnel from her courtroom during a trial.
[38:33.000 --> 38:37.000]  That's a violation of the First Amendment.
[38:37.000 --> 38:43.000]  It's also a violation of the Texas Constitution in that all proceedings in Texas
[38:43.000 --> 38:49.000]  are required to be public under the Texas Constitution.
[38:49.000 --> 38:57.000]  And those proceedings can't be barred to the public or to any part of the public
[38:57.000 --> 39:03.000]  because we all have a right to be there, including the media.
[39:03.000 --> 39:08.000]  Well, the News 8 guy that was there ran and hid.
[39:08.000 --> 39:15.000]  But to his credit, he ran and hid in the office of a district judge.
[39:15.000 --> 39:18.000]  And he posed a question to the district judge.
[39:18.000 --> 39:25.000]  Can a municipal court judge bar the press or any form of media
[39:25.000 --> 39:30.000]  from her courtroom during an official proceeding?
[39:30.000 --> 39:34.000]  And the district judge was like, no, why do you ask?
[39:34.000 --> 39:39.000]  Well, because you have a municipal judge that has decided to do exactly that
[39:39.000 --> 39:41.000]  and throw me out of her courtroom.
[39:41.000 --> 39:46.000]  Now, at the same time, I was there and I had been talking with this news crew
[39:46.000 --> 39:50.000]  and several others that were there that day down in the lobby.
[39:50.000 --> 39:56.000]  And I'd been handing out cards showing that I was a co-host on Rule of Law Radio,
[39:56.000 --> 40:02.000]  which I'm sure managed to find at least one of on their way back upstairs and into her hands.
[40:02.000 --> 40:04.000]  How do I know this?
[40:04.000 --> 40:10.000]  Because even though all of the News 8 personnel and other media personnel
[40:10.000 --> 40:17.000]  that had been present in the courtroom were no longer there, I was.
[40:17.000 --> 40:24.000]  Statman came into court, saw me sitting there, and went into a diatribe stating
[40:24.000 --> 40:29.000]  that I have ordered that all media personnel are to evacuate this courtroom
[40:29.000 --> 40:33.000]  and not to enter while these proceedings are ongoing.
[40:33.000 --> 40:38.000]  Once I call this court to session, if any of those people remain present,
[40:38.000 --> 40:41.000]  you shall be held in contempt of court.
[40:41.000 --> 40:44.000]  And I just sat there and looked at her.
[40:44.000 --> 40:50.000]  She called the court to order and then went back to doing her business
[40:50.000 --> 40:53.000]  because I wasn't getting up and going anywhere.
[40:53.000 --> 41:00.000]  And she knew, she had to have known by her actions,
[41:00.000 --> 41:04.000]  that there wasn't a damn thing she could do about me being there.
[41:04.000 --> 41:09.000]  And she was not scaring me out.
[41:09.000 --> 41:12.000]  And she went on with the case.
[41:12.000 --> 41:19.000]  And she handled it just as badly as she did that little endeavor the whole way through.
[41:19.000 --> 41:24.000]  The Texas judiciary, top to bottom, is incompetent.
[41:24.000 --> 41:27.000]  They are immoral.
[41:27.000 --> 41:40.000]  They lack any formal understanding of individual rights, constitutional limitations of authority, nothing.
[41:40.000 --> 41:47.000]  And if you don't believe that, get into a conversation with one of them over those subjects
[41:47.000 --> 41:52.000]  and watch them come to the defense of every judge that you point out has committed
[41:52.000 --> 42:00.000]  a violation of these canons or some law and see if they don't come up with something to say the judge was right,
[42:00.000 --> 42:04.000]  even if there's no way for that judge to be right.
[42:04.000 --> 42:11.000]  And even if they do go, well, yeah, they shouldn't have done that, but it really ain't that big a deal,
[42:11.000 --> 42:16.000]  you guarantee that's going to be what comes after it if they do admit any wrongdoing.
[42:16.000 --> 42:19.000]  Yeah, it really wasn't that big a deal.
[42:19.000 --> 42:22.000]  You know, that's just the way it's going to work.
[42:22.000 --> 42:27.000]  Now, that being said, rather than continue down through the canons, there's still several more,
[42:27.000 --> 42:35.000]  and most of them are in Cannon 3 at this point, but they also violate Cannon 6 here in Texas on a very regular basis.
[42:35.000 --> 42:42.000]  So what I'm going to do now is I'm going to jump into the motion that I'm working on that deals with this,
[42:42.000 --> 42:49.000]  and I'm going to let you in on some of the deep dark secrets that's going on in these Texas courtrooms.
[42:49.000 --> 42:52.000]  And this is both municipal and justice.
[42:52.000 --> 43:02.000]  But remember that the code in Texas that you use to disqualify a municipal judge does not deal with justice of the peace judges.
[43:02.000 --> 43:13.000]  There is no specific statute that allows you to disqualify a JP in the same manner and for the same reasons
[43:13.000 --> 43:21.000]  as what's written into 29A-1 of the government code dealing with municipal judges.
[43:21.000 --> 43:24.000]  Now, why that is, I couldn't tell you.
[43:24.000 --> 43:33.000]  But the fact is, JPs are every bit as bad in most cases as a municipal judge.
[43:33.000 --> 43:37.000]  And we're going to find out how that works when we get back after this break.
[43:37.000 --> 43:39.000]  So y'all hang in there and keep listening.
[43:39.000 --> 43:42.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig,
[43:42.000 --> 43:49.000]  and we are dealing with disqualification of judges in the courtrooms here in Texas.
[43:49.000 --> 43:54.000]  So y'all hang on and we'll get into an actual motion for this purpose when we get back.
[44:19.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:39.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.000 --> 44:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Hello.
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com,
[45:07.000 --> 45:13.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas
[45:13.000 --> 45:17.000]  on Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products
[45:17.000 --> 45:19.000]  with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:27.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil,
[45:27.000 --> 45:31.000]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:38.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 46:02.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[46:02.000 --> 46:28.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:28.000 --> 46:30.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:30.000 --> 46:35.000]  All right, we're going to get into this motion to disqualify or recuse a judge,
[46:35.000 --> 46:41.000]  and I'm going to go ahead and just deal with the judge that we,
[46:41.000 --> 46:44.000]  one of the judges that this motion applies to.
[46:44.000 --> 46:46.000]  There's actually three.
[46:46.000 --> 46:50.000]  I'm going after three judges and at least three city attorneys,
[46:50.000 --> 46:55.000]  and I am going to seek their utter destruction.
[46:55.000 --> 47:00.000]  I am looking to get them disbarred, and I am looking to get them banned
[47:00.000 --> 47:06.000]  from the practice of law because these people have created
[47:06.000 --> 47:12.000]  an organized criminal enterprise within the San Antonio court system
[47:12.000 --> 47:17.000]  that is set up specifically to deprive everyone that appears before them
[47:17.000 --> 47:22.000]  of every right they have.
[47:22.000 --> 47:25.000]  So let's get into this.
[47:25.000 --> 47:27.000]  Summary of respondents' arguments.
[47:27.000 --> 47:30.000]  Respondent files this motion to disqualify Judge Linda Connolly,
[47:30.000 --> 47:34.000]  hereafter Judge Connolly of the City of San Antonio Municipal Court,
[47:34.000 --> 47:39.000]  for acts perpetrated by Judge Connolly on or about these two dates.
[47:39.000 --> 47:43.000]  This motion is filed pursuant Chapter 29A-1 Government Code
[47:43.000 --> 47:47.000]  and is being done as soon as was practicable after respondent realized
[47:47.000 --> 47:50.000]  that not only was Judge Connolly judicially incompetent
[47:50.000 --> 47:52.000]  and morally unfit to serve as a judge,
[47:52.000 --> 47:55.000]  but she had absolutely no intention of following either the law
[47:55.000 --> 47:59.000]  or proper judicial procedure and knowingly and willfully acted
[47:59.000 --> 48:03.000]  to misrepresent the law and proper procedures to respondent,
[48:03.000 --> 48:07.000]  thus effectively denying respondent and those that are similarly situated
[48:07.000 --> 48:12.000]  with even the appearance of fairness and impartiality
[48:12.000 --> 48:16.000]  or the right to fundamental procedural and substantive due process.
[48:16.000 --> 48:20.000]  Actions requiring disqualification.
[48:20.000 --> 48:24.000]  Issue, is the City of San Antonio Municipal Court bound
[48:24.000 --> 48:27.000]  by the disqualification procedures from municipal judges
[48:27.000 --> 48:32.000]  as codified in sub-Chapter 29A-1 Government Code?
[48:32.000 --> 48:35.000]  Pursuant Chapter 29A-1 Government Code,
[48:35.000 --> 48:39.000]  Judge Connolly is required to forward this motion to the regional presiding judge,
[48:39.000 --> 48:42.000]  in this case Billy Ray Stubblefield,
[48:42.000 --> 48:45.000]  for review and scheduling of a proper hearing with an assigned judge.
[48:45.000 --> 48:51.000]  See Section 29.055, Subsection C, Sub-Item 1 Government Code.
[48:51.000 --> 48:54.000]  The filing of this motion in the subsequent hearing on the matter
[48:54.000 --> 48:57.000]  is the only opportunity respondent has to get documented facts
[48:57.000 --> 49:00.000]  entered into the record regarding the unlawful
[49:00.000 --> 49:03.000]  and judicially abhorrent criminal behavior of Judge Connolly
[49:03.000 --> 49:07.000]  that has served to deprive respondent of the right of due process.
[49:07.000 --> 49:11.000]  Though respondent had every right to believe that all proceedings
[49:11.000 --> 49:14.000]  would be conducted fairly, impartially, and in accordance with law,
[49:14.000 --> 49:18.000]  thus making such disqualification unnecessary,
[49:18.000 --> 49:20.000]  the facts have proven otherwise.
[49:20.000 --> 49:23.000]  Therefore, respondent was left with no choice
[49:23.000 --> 49:27.000]  but to request a continuance at the proceedings being conducted on November 12,
[49:27.000 --> 49:34.000]  since such motions can be made only as a verified written pleading,
[49:34.000 --> 49:38.000]  pursuant Section 29.052B2 Government Code,
[49:38.000 --> 49:42.000]  and only after the offending judge has demonstrated a willingness
[49:42.000 --> 49:47.000]  to violate respondent's right of due process, the laws of this state,
[49:47.000 --> 49:52.000]  and or the laws associated with the duties of the offending judge's office.
[49:52.000 --> 49:56.000]  Refusal to comply with laws on disqualification procedure.
[49:56.000 --> 50:00.000]  Pursuant Section 29.055C Government Code,
[50:00.000 --> 50:03.000]  upon respondent's making of a motion to disqualify,
[50:03.000 --> 50:06.000]  Judge Connolly was required to cease and desist all further action
[50:06.000 --> 50:09.000]  and respondent's cases until such time as a hearing and ruling
[50:09.000 --> 50:13.000]  on her disqualification was returned by the judge assigned to administer
[50:13.000 --> 50:18.000]  the hearing pursuant Section 29.055C2.
[50:18.000 --> 50:22.000]  Judge Connolly openly and contemptuously ignored this requirement of law
[50:22.000 --> 50:26.000]  and proceeded forward while ignoring and refusing respondent's request
[50:26.000 --> 50:29.000]  for a continuance in order to file a properly written
[50:29.000 --> 50:32.000]  and verified motion for disqualification.
[50:32.000 --> 50:36.000]  Respondent believes this to be a violation of Code of Judicial Conduct,
[50:36.000 --> 50:40.000]  Canon 1, upholding the integrity and independence of the judiciary,
[50:40.000 --> 50:43.000]  as respondent can have no faith in the integrity and independence
[50:43.000 --> 50:46.000]  of a judiciary that refuses to comply with the law
[50:46.000 --> 50:51.000]  and or openly violates the rights of an accused individual to due process.
[50:51.000 --> 50:54.000]  Respondent also believes these actions are a violation of Code
[50:54.000 --> 50:57.000]  of Judicial Conduct, Canon 2, avoiding impropriety
[50:57.000 --> 51:00.000]  and the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities.
[51:00.000 --> 51:04.000]  As Judge Connolly made absolutely no effort to avoid any appearance
[51:04.000 --> 51:08.000]  of or actual impropriety by openly disregarding
[51:08.000 --> 51:11.000]  and misrepresenting the laws on disqualification
[51:11.000 --> 51:13.000]  and proper criminal procedure.
[51:13.000 --> 51:17.000]  Respondent also believes these actions are a violation of Canon 3,
[51:17.000 --> 51:20.000]  performing the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently,
[51:20.000 --> 51:24.000]  as Judge Connolly acted neither impartially nor diligently
[51:24.000 --> 51:28.000]  in either understanding or applying the law in the matter before the court
[51:28.000 --> 51:33.000]  and in a manner biased toward the prosecution and prejudicial to respondent.
[51:33.000 --> 51:37.000]  Finally, respondent believes these actions are also a violation of Canon 6,
[51:37.000 --> 51:40.000]  compliance with the Code of Judicial Conduct,
[51:40.000 --> 51:45.000]  as all of these actions are direct violations of same.
[51:45.000 --> 51:48.000]  Knowing and intentional misrepresentation of the law.
[51:48.000 --> 51:53.000]  Issue, is it lawful and legal for a judge of the City of San Antonio
[51:53.000 --> 51:57.000]  Municipal Court to knowingly and intentionally conspire
[51:57.000 --> 52:01.000]  and collude with the city attorney to misstate and misrepresent the law
[52:01.000 --> 52:06.000]  to persons appearing before them in order to place them at a legal disadvantage
[52:06.000 --> 52:09.000]  and deny them in their right of due process?
[52:09.000 --> 52:13.000]  Respondent objected to the presence and collusion of multiple city attorneys
[52:13.000 --> 52:18.000]  at the prosecution table and allegedly assigned to respondent's matter.
[52:18.000 --> 52:21.000]  Judge Connolly, acting in concert and collusion with these attorneys,
[52:21.000 --> 52:24.000]  did knowingly and willingly misrepresent the law
[52:24.000 --> 52:27.000]  and its proper application to respondent's matter
[52:27.000 --> 52:31.000]  by allowing multiple city attorneys to act in prosecutorial concert
[52:31.000 --> 52:35.000]  against respondent in the proceedings currently before the court.
[52:35.000 --> 52:41.000]  A direct violation of Article 45.020B, Code of Criminal Procedure,
[52:41.000 --> 52:44.000]  which limits the prosecution to a single attorney.
[52:44.000 --> 52:49.000]  Both Judge Connolly and the group of city attorneys colluded in insisting
[52:49.000 --> 52:54.000]  that this was no longer forbidden as of September 1, 2015,
[52:54.000 --> 52:59.000]  due to an legislative amendment of Article 45.020B
[52:59.000 --> 53:03.000]  authorizing multiple members of counsel on both sides.
[53:03.000 --> 53:09.000]  However, the September 1, 2015 amendment included a specific provision in Section 2
[53:09.000 --> 53:16.000]  that required all prosecutorial proceedings that had commenced prior to September 1, 2015
[53:16.000 --> 53:23.000]  to be continued and prosecuted under the pre-amendment limitation of a single prosecutor.
[53:23.000 --> 53:28.000]  And it is a documented fact that all proceedings currently before the City of San Antonio
[53:28.000 --> 53:35.000]  Municipal Court involving respondent predate September 1, 2015.
[53:35.000 --> 53:39.000]  A fact of which both Judge Connolly and the group of city attorneys
[53:39.000 --> 53:42.000]  cannot rightfully claim to have been unaware.
[53:42.000 --> 53:45.000]  Judge Connolly even directed the city attorney to provide respondent
[53:45.000 --> 53:49.000]  with a copy of the amended statute, which clearly displayed
[53:49.000 --> 53:55.000]  the pre-September 1, 2015 single counsel provision for all to see.
[53:55.000 --> 53:59.000]  Respondent believes this to be a violation of Code of Judicial Conduct,
[53:59.000 --> 54:04.000]  Canon 1, Canon 2, Canon 3, and Canon 6.
[54:04.000 --> 54:08.000]  Intentionally obstructing access to the courts.
[54:08.000 --> 54:14.000]  Issue, is it lawful and legal for a judge of the City of San Antonio Municipal Court
[54:14.000 --> 54:18.000]  to knowingly and intentionally obstruct respondent's access to the courts
[54:18.000 --> 54:23.000]  by denying the right to file proper motions challenging subject matter
[54:23.000 --> 54:29.000]  and impersonal jurisdiction in an effort to deny respondent's right of due process.
[54:29.000 --> 54:34.000]  The acts alleged herein show Judge Connolly has no respect for the laws
[54:34.000 --> 54:38.000]  associated with the duties of her office, the due process rights of respondent
[54:38.000 --> 54:43.000]  or others similarly situated, or in promoting even the general appearance
[54:43.000 --> 54:47.000]  of fairness and impartiality.
[54:47.000 --> 54:52.000]  Therefore, her actions demand disqualification of a constitutional nature,
[54:52.000 --> 54:57.000]  including actual divestment of her office and the ability to practice law.
[54:57.000 --> 55:02.000]  Respondent argues that presiding Judge Connolly is hereby disqualified
[55:02.000 --> 55:06.000]  ab initio pursuant Chapter 29A-1 Government Code
[55:06.000 --> 55:11.000]  from presiding over any current or future proceedings involving respondent,
[55:11.000 --> 55:15.000]  and that all rulings and decisions in respondent's matter are void
[55:15.000 --> 55:19.000]  for lack of jurisdiction, failure to follow proper procedure,
[55:19.000 --> 55:23.000]  failure to comply with law, and deprivation of respondent's right of due process
[55:23.000 --> 55:25.000]  under color of law.
[55:25.000 --> 55:29.000]  Respondent shows by the facts stated herein that Judge Connolly,
[55:29.000 --> 55:34.000]  while acting under color of law, knowingly and willfully did violate specific laws
[55:34.000 --> 55:39.000]  relating to the duties of her office, proper criminal and judicial procedure,
[55:39.000 --> 55:43.000]  numerous canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct and Judicial Ethics,
[55:43.000 --> 55:46.000]  and acted with bias and prejudice against respondent
[55:46.000 --> 55:50.000]  in the preliminary proceedings held before her.
[55:50.000 --> 55:53.000]  Furthermore, respondent shows by the facts stated herein
[55:53.000 --> 55:56.000]  that Judge Connolly's actions under color of law
[55:56.000 --> 55:59.000]  have deprived respondent of protected fundamental rights,
[55:59.000 --> 56:04.000]  including but not limited to the right to challenge subject matter
[56:04.000 --> 56:08.000]  and impersonal jurisdiction as well as the right of due process,
[56:08.000 --> 56:14.000]  which deprives the court of all personal and subject matter jurisdiction over respondent.
[56:14.000 --> 56:18.000]  Furthermore, the facts show that Judge Connolly's actions under color of law,
[56:18.000 --> 56:23.000]  while absent all lawful jurisdiction, constitute criminal acts
[56:23.000 --> 56:27.000]  for which criminal complaints are to be filed by respondent
[56:27.000 --> 56:32.000]  with the Bexar County Grand Jury pursuant Article 2.03 Code of Criminal Procedure.
[56:32.000 --> 56:37.000]  Lastly, respondent is also preparing to file several judicial conduct complaints
[56:37.000 --> 56:40.000]  against Judge Connolly with the State Judicial Conduct Committee
[56:40.000 --> 56:45.000]  for violations of multiple canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct and Judicial Ethics.
[56:45.000 --> 56:50.000]  Issue, is the City of San Antonio Municipal Court bound by the entirety
[56:50.000 --> 56:54.000]  of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Class C fine-only misdemeanor proceedings?
[56:54.000 --> 56:57.000]  Now here we get into some of the arguments I've made before
[56:57.000 --> 57:00.000]  about whether or not these are actually criminal cases.
[57:00.000 --> 57:03.000]  If they have failed to prove jurisdiction,
[57:03.000 --> 57:08.000]  which they can only do in transportation cases in one of four ways,
[57:08.000 --> 57:12.000]  or a combination of four ways.
[57:12.000 --> 57:17.000]  If they don't prove up that jurisdiction, they have none.
[57:17.000 --> 57:21.000]  Okay, they don't have any.
[57:21.000 --> 57:25.000]  And the four ways they can do that is by confession of the accused
[57:25.000 --> 57:28.000]  that they were engaged in transportation,
[57:28.000 --> 57:33.000]  production of physical evidence in the form of one, a bill of lading,
[57:33.000 --> 57:38.000]  two, a passenger manifest, or three, a commercial log book that shows
[57:38.000 --> 57:42.000]  that the accused was actually on the clock and being paid
[57:42.000 --> 57:46.000]  at the time of the alleged offense.
[57:46.000 --> 57:51.000]  Now those are the only ways that they could ever get the jurisdiction.
[57:51.000 --> 57:57.000]  Now that may sound like a big leap, but had you been in class this past Sunday
[57:57.000 --> 58:00.000]  and seen what I went over on the board,
[58:00.000 --> 58:06.000]  you would have seen exactly how we can compel the courts to admit
[58:06.000 --> 58:11.000]  that every decision they've ever made about the transportation code
[58:11.000 --> 58:16.000]  and its related offenses are bogus.
[58:16.000 --> 58:25.000]  They were illegal from the beginning, and the court should have known as much.
[58:25.000 --> 58:32.000]  We have no good judges, at least none that don't have a headstone.
[58:32.000 --> 58:35.000]  All right, folks, y'all hang on. This is the top of the hour break.
[58:35.000 --> 58:50.000]  I still have some more of this to go, so y'all bear with me, and we'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:54.000 --> 58:58.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:02.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:02.000 --> 59:07.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.000 --> 59:28.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:44.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown,
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  providing your daily bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:20.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:20.000 --> 01:00:27.000]  Markets for the 23rd of November, 2015, opened up with gold at $1,067.60 an ounce,
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:32.000]  silver $14.08 an ounce, Texas crude $40.39 a barrel,
[01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $324 U.S. currency.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:47.000]  Today in history, Tuesday, November 23rd, 1971,
[01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:51.000]  the People's Republic of China is officially seated in the U.N. Security Council.
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  Resolution 2758 recognized the PRC
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  and stripped the former Republic of China's membership to the Security Council.
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:08.000]  In recent news, New Yorkers and visitors to the city have a new and easy-to-use anti-terrorism app,
[01:01:08.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  which makes reporting suspicious activity on their smartphones as easy as sending a text.
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  The initiative, See Something, Send Something, encourages New Yorkers to alert the authorities of suspicious activities.
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  Users can simply send a photo of whatever it seems that they are concerned about or just simply send a text.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  The Metropolitan Transportation Authority will be hiring 46 new officers trained in counterterrorism
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:32.000]  to deal with the influx of information.
[01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:35.000]  New York City has been on increased alert since supporters of the Islamic State group
[01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:39.000]  claimed responsibility for the attacks in Paris, France earlier this month.
[01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  ISIS militants released a video last week
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:49.000]  showing New York City as a potential future target.
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:53.000]  The Federal Aviation Administration released its proposed drone regulations today.
[01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:56.000]  The recommendations came from a task force created by the agency.
[01:01:56.000 --> 01:02:02.000]  They are calling for all drones half a pound to 55 pounds to be registered into a federal database.
[01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  They are demanding that all drone owners display their government-issued registration number
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:08.000]  on the machines themselves as well,
[01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:11.000]  recommending that owners submit their names and addresses
[01:02:11.000 --> 01:02:14.000]  or at the very least the option of email and phone numbers.
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:19.000]  All of us is to ensure accountability by creating a traceable link between aircraft and owner
[01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:22.000]  and to encourage the maximum levels of regulatory compliance
[01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:26.000]  by making the registration process as simple as possible.
[01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:30.000]  The FAA is looking to get these new regulations in by the holidays
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  since Consumer Technology Association, a trade group, has estimated that roughly 400,000 drones
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  are expected to be sold this holiday season.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:44.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown has been looking for new headquarters.
[01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  Our apologies for missing the scoop as of late.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  We'll be back next week.
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:51.000]  Your thoughts and prayers are appreciated.
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:03:05.000]  This has been your Lowdown for November 23, 2015.
[01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:48.000]  Alright, folks, we are back.
[01:03:48.000 --> 01:03:50.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:54.000]  Alright, let's get on with this here.
[01:03:54.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  Alright, other than going into the 4502 requirements,
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:01.000] .002 application of the chapter for this,
[01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:04.000]  I'm going to go ahead and skip down to some of the other arguments we're doing here.
[01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  Therefore, Judge Connolly and the City Attorney have officially declared the Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  irrelevant to these and all other criminal proceedings held in the City of San Antonio Municipal Court,
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:19.000]  both by their respective actions and failure to perform even a single item of any article therein
[01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  in accordance with the plain and common language of the Code's provisions during all proceedings thus far.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:33.000]  Thus Respondent has good cause to believe that these facts substantiate his or her assertion
[01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  and conclusion that this is not and cannot be a criminal proceeding,
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  and therefore can only be a non-case, i.e., it is civil,
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:47.000]  and therefore Judge Connolly and the Court lack jurisdiction for any purpose other than to dismiss.
[01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  Therefore, by acting without jurisdiction and outside of all constitutional and lawful authority
[01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:56.000]  and in violation of Respondent's fundamentally protected right,
[01:04:56.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  Judge Connolly is both criminally and civilly liable to Respondent for her torts and trespasses
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:05.000]  and is disqualified for all purposes.
[01:05:05.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  Issue, did the Court violate Respondent's right of due process by ignoring specific rights
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:12.000]  codified in the Code of Criminal Procedure?
[01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:19.000]  This is the argument based upon their ignoring 45.018b and failing to provide you with a copy of the complaint
[01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  no later than one day prior to any proceeding in the prosecution under that complaint.
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  That is a statutorily created right, people.
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:34.000]  The Judge is not free to ignore it.
[01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  And any time a Judge insists that they're going to move forward after that bell has been rung
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  should be hit with one of these motions to disqualify.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  And that would go for any Judge that comes along after them, okay?
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  If they insist on moving forward, you cannot unring this bell, you cannot reschedule,
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  you cannot do this later because it has already been a violation and it cannot be undone.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:15.000]  They can't fix it.
[01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  They know they can't fix it.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:23.000]  So instead, they just bulldoze it and hope that you don't have the cojones to stand up and say,
[01:06:23.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  oh, hell no, you ain't, which is what you need to be doing.
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:38.000]  Respondent filed her special appearance and motion to dismiss the trial court in a timely manner
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  long before her commanded appearance for a sham pretrial proceeding in which the only objective
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:49.000]  of the court and the prosecution was to coerce Respondent into either making a deal or entering a plea.
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  Neither of these are proper purposes for commanding a pretrial appearance before the court
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  according to the statute to this state codified in Article 28.01 Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:05.000]  Acting suesponte and without any form of written or oral rebuttal by the prosecution
[01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  and without so much as reading Respondent's pleadings,
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:16.000]  Judge Connolly dismissed Respondent's written pleadings on the points of law relating to the complete lack
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  of a valid sworn complaint and proper charging instrument,
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  neither having ever been filed in the court record,
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:32.000]  in addition to the fact that no proper sufficient and timely notice of either instrument was ever served upon Respondent.
[01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:35.000]  As no complaint was filed and no notice given Respondent,
[01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  the court never had any jurisdiction to conduct any proceedings whatsoever.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:44.000]  Judge Connolly, in an effort to conceal the lack of jurisdiction of the court,
[01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:48.000]  once again misrepresented and misapplied the law to Respondent
[01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  by insisting that the citation itself served as a valid sworn complaint.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:08:00.000]  Presumably, Judge Connolly was attempting to invoke the provisions of Article 27.14 D Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:04.000]  in stating that a citation may serve in lieu of a valid sworn complaint.
[01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  However, it is easily demonstrable that Judge Connolly is not only judicially incompetent,
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:15.000]  but also knowingly and willfully misrepresenting the purpose and application
[01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:20.000]  of 27.14 D Code of Criminal Procedure to Respondent.
[01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:24.000]  In order to be even remotely applicable in Respondent's matter,
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  Article 27.14 D Code of Criminal Procedure would first require that a written waiver
[01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  setting aside the requirement of a sworn complaint be presented to and filed in the court.
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  And that waiver must contain the signatures of both Respondent and the acting attorney for the state.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  No such waiver exists in the record, nor has any such waiver ever been submitted to and signed by the Respondent.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:53.000]  Furthermore, the citation does not meet the minimum statutory requirements of a valid complaint
[01:08:53.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  as set forth in Article 45.019A Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  Thus, the citation cannot lawfully nor legally serve as a valid sworn complaint,
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:10.000]  not even if such a waiver existed.
[01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  And absent a valid sworn complaint,
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:20.000]  the jurisdiction of the City of San Antonio Municipal Court has never been lawfully and legally invoked.
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:26.000]  Furthermore, Judge Connolly refused to even acknowledge the due process violations
[01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:31.000]  created by proceeding absent a sworn complaint.
[01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:36.000]  As the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has themselves set the filing of a complaint
[01:09:36.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  via the case of Ex Parte Greenwood,
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:46.000]  as the minimum bar to investing municipal and justice courts with jurisdiction of a Class C misdemeanor cause,
[01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  which Respondent believes is a constitutionally and statutorily incorrect ruling,
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:10:00.000]  therefore, how is it even remotely lawful for the court and the prosecutor to conspire and collude to proceed against Respondent
[01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:08.000]  knowing full well that jurisdiction has never been invoked by the filing of a proper complaint?
[01:10:08.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  It is apparently common practice for the City of San Antonio Municipal Court and FYI to all the folks in Radio Land,
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  every Texas Municipal and Justice Court,
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:25.000]  to initiate and conduct its pretrial prosecutorial proceedings without jurisdiction
[01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:30.000]  and without a valid complaint having been filed,
[01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  thus preventing the speedy trial clock from ever being started in favor of Respondent or others similarly situated,
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:44.000]  which in and of itself is a deprivation of rights.
[01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:49.000]  During this practice, Judge Connolly, acting absent all jurisdiction in the matter,
[01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:56.000]  issued numerous instruments simulating legal process in violation of Section 32.48 Penal Code
[01:10:56.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  and conducted several judicial proceedings prior to the court's jurisdiction
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  ever being properly invoked by the filing of a valid criminal complaint,
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:13.000]  proving once again Judge Connolly's level of judicial incompetence, bias, and lack of professional ethics knows no bounds.
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:20.000]  Furthermore, Judge Connolly acted in concert inclusion with the prosecutor to deny Respondent in a fair,
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:28.000]  impartial, and speedy trial by allowing prosecutorial proceedings to commence without such a complaint having been filed,
[01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  thus preventing the speedy trial clock from ever being started in the case,
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  the result being that Respondent's right to a speedy trial is directly harmed by being preliminarily processed for prosecution
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:48.000]  without benefit and protection of any passage of time being charged against the state
[01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:51.000]  for failure to timely commence the trial on the merits.
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:12:01.000]  Additionally, it is statutorily impossible for Respondent to comply with the requirements of Article 45.019F
[01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:08.000]  Code of Criminal Procedure by challenging the complaint until a complaint has been filed and served upon Respondent,
[01:12:08.000 --> 01:12:10.000]  which has never been done.
[01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  When a complaint is neither filed nor served upon the accused until the day of trial,
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:24.000]  if at all, it is not only statutorily impossible to challenge the complaint's form and substance pursuant 45.019F,
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:32.000]  it also makes it statutorily impossible for Respondent to comply with Article 2801 Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:39.000]  by filing a motion to set aside or quash the complaint no less than seven days prior to any pretrial proceeding.
[01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:46.000]  To date, the requirements of 45.018B Code of Criminal Procedure have not been complied with,
[01:12:46.000 --> 01:12:51.000]  thus violating Respondent's protected right of notice as denoted by the use of the phrase
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:13:10.000]  is entitled to pursue it Section 311.016 Subsection 4 Government Code and as recognized and protected by Article 1.05 Code of Criminal Procedure and Texas Constitution Article 1, Section 10.
[01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:16.000]  By right and law, Respondent is entitled to challenge the subject matter jurisdiction of the court at any time
[01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  and in personam jurisdiction prior to any general appearance and to have the response to such challenge
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:27.000]  addressed by actual points of law and evidence submitted into the record of the court.
[01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  Neither the court nor the prosecution has ever met this requirement.
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  In fact, the jurisdictional challenges posed by Respondent were simply ignored by Judge Connolly and the city attorney,
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:48.000]  with Judge Connolly again acting under color of law and proceeding sua sponte to simply declare by fiat that she and the court had jurisdiction,
[01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:55.000]  despite no legal evidence of that fact being submitted into the record by either the prosecution or the court.
[01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:01.000]  Issue, did the court violate the laws of this state and the Respondent's right of due process
[01:14:01.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  by requiring that a plea be entered before a clerk rather than a proper judicial officer in a judicial proceeding?
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:18.000]  Under color of what law and authority does Judge Connolly or any other judge of this state act to ignore and deny the laws of this state
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:26.000]  by allegedly delegating judicial authority to a mere clerk of the court or a jail facility to impersonate a judicial officer
[01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:34.000]  through the process of conducting judicial proceedings for the express purpose of taking and entering a plea upon the official record of the court?
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  Issue, did the courts violate Respondent's right of due process by failing to follow the requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Code of Judicial Ethics?
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:59.000]  Respondent has procedural due process rights protected by the requirements of Articles 1.05, 2.04, 2.05, 1.14, 45.002, 45.018B, and 45.019F Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  and Texas Constitution Article 1, Section 10.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  If this were an actual criminal case, then by failing to comply with these provisions of law relating to the duties of her office
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  regarding criminal prosecutions, Judge Connolly, while acting under color of law, knowingly and willfully violated the due process rights of Respondent,
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:25.000]  thus creating impression of bias and partiality on behalf of the prosecution.
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:41.000]  Furthermore, Judge Connolly, while acting under color of law, knowingly and willfully failed to act without bias and partiality by soliciting and accepting advice from the city attorney to deny Respondent's motions.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  In so doing, Judge Connolly, while acting under color of law and by colluding and conspiring with the city attorney to deny Respondent's due process rights under color of law,
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  violated numerous canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and again, Canon 1, Canon 2, Canon 3, Canon 6, and Canon 8.
[01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  And Canon 8 is there simply because of construction and terminology, which says that shall or shall not denotes binding obligations,
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:21.000]  the violation of which can result in disciplinary action. Law denotes court rules as well as statutes, constitutional provisions, and decisional law.
[01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:28.000]  In other words, Canon 8 says these words mean this in relation to your duties under this code.
[01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  Failure to comply in accordance with these meanings results in disciplinary action.
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:45.000]  That never happens, or at least it only happens 61 out of 1,075 opportunities.
[01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  Okay?
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  All right, folks. We're at the end of this. After this, we'll start taking calls.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:55.000]  So when I get back, I'm going to finish the last part of this, and then I'll start taking you on the phone.
[01:16:55.000 --> 01:16:58.000]  We'll be right back, so y'all hang on.
[01:16:58.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:18.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metal dealers and journalists.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular longevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollenburst.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:46.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbillion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Order now.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Lafogos Radio Network.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:50.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  Alright, we've gone through the motion I'm working on to disqualify one of the judges down there.
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  The other one says substantially the same thing for the other judge, and then we have some special information included in the one for the head judge
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:10.000]  that allows all of this to go on in that court down there.
[01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:15.000]  So there's actually going to be three separate motions dealing with three separate judges,
[01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:22.000]  and then there's going to be multiple bar grievances against the city attorneys that are involved in these cases,
[01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:31.000]  as well as bar grievances against the judges since they all have to be bar card carrying attorneys to be court of record judges.
[01:20:31.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  So I'm going after disbarment. I'm not simply going after, you know, moving to some other judge in some other court.
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:52.000]  These people have no business sitting on a bench, none, unless it's as a homeless individual on a park bench.
[01:20:52.000 --> 01:21:00.000]  I would go for that, but they don't deserve to be sitting in a court with power over anyone.
[01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:09.000]  Now don't get me wrong, I can understand how some things day in and day out, it can become a process, and you can get jaded, and you can do all of that.
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:25.000]  I can understand it, but I'm not going to accept it because you have a duty to not allow that to affect proper application of the law
[01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  and proper administration of justice to all equally and fairly.
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:43.000]  If you're having such a hard time keeping that straight, you should have left on your own, and when you don't, you're going to have me to deal with.
[01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  If I am somebody you get involved with, I'm not going to put up with it. I don't expect any of you to put up with it.
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:22:03.000]  But by the same token, what are you going to do to prevent it when you have no clue what is being done and how to stop it?
[01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:10.000]  My class is too small on Sundays, and I realize it's a Sunday.
[01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  And the reason it's a Sunday is because that was the only day out of the week that the most people said they could come.
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:29.000]  For a little while, we had 8 to 10 on a regular basis, and now it's more like 2 or 3 or 4, and occasionally it upswelling to 8 or 9.
[01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  But even 10 is not adequate. You can get 140 people in that place down there, and I know they issue more tickets than that in a single day in Austin.
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:50.000]  Between code enforcement and the Travis County Sheriff's Department, the Austin Police Department, the Sunset Valley Police Department, the Rockdale Police Department,
[01:22:50.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  the Round Rock Police Department, the Beulah Police Department, my class should be brimming over every Sunday.
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  And I am astounded by the fact that it's not, not because I think I'm something great,
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:23.000]  but because I cannot see why a people that believes themselves to be free are so easily parted from what they have worked so hard to earn through fraud.
[01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  And they accept it as just the cost of living.
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  I find that completely unacceptable, at least for myself. I can't speak for you.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  Maybe no one will ever be able to speak for you and why you feel that it's not necessary to defend yourself against this being preyed upon by those that are supposed to serve you rather than subjugate you.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  I guess in school now that they're teaching those two terms as being interchangeable. Servant is now master and therefore capable of subjugation of the master that is now the servant.
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:18.000]  The New Circle of Life.
[01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:29.000]  Folks, you can take it or leave it for what it's worth. But if you're not down there in that Sunday class and you're not listening to this radio show, you're, I don't know how you live with yourself.
[01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:37.000]  You allow yourself not only to be victimized, but every member of your family to be victimized.
[01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:50.000]  You're not spreading any information. You're not letting anyone know that they are being harmed. You're just accepting it.
[01:24:50.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  And I just don't know how to deal with that. It's beyond me that you would find that acceptable.
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:11.000]  That being said, I would love to see more people in the class. I would love to see more people making a real effort to understand the things that I'm teaching in that class.
[01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  Because what I've taught this past weekend is exactly why we can win the constitutional challenge.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:45.000]  But it's going to be one hell of a fight because of the tsunami of backlash it's going to cause. Because that one simple invalidation of that one code will have catastrophic economic and control impact on the state as a whole
[01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:58.000]  and every municipality and county in it. Because every one of them would have to refund every penny they've taken with interest.
[01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:12.000]  Or they can be sued for triple that amount for fraud. You get it?
[01:26:12.000 --> 01:26:18.000]  So making them recognize that this is not constitutional isn't going to be hard.
[01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:27.000]  But getting them to rule properly that it is unconstitutional in accordance with the Texas Constitution, that's where the war is going to be.
[01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:37.000]  Because they're going to look not at what their duty is under the law, they're going to look at what the repercussion outcome is for their buddies and the rest of government.
[01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:54.000]  Because none of them will have a hole to crawl into, a rock to hide behind, or a safe place to go where they cannot be sued personally once and for all with zero immunity of any kind
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:27:09.000]  for every case they've ever prosecuted and every dollar they've ever taken since 1995's enactment of that unconstitutional code.
[01:27:09.000 --> 01:27:15.000]  It will be catastrophic financially for them to admit it.
[01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:24.000]  So what they're going to do is if we take this on a person by person basis, they're going to sweep them under the rug to avoid that full disclosure.
[01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:31.000]  They're going to try to hide the results of this for as long as they possibly can because the writing is on the wall of what will happen.
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:42.000]  Bank on it. They are going to fight us tooth and nail to never admit that this act was unconstitutional from minute one.
[01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:49.000]  And we need to stand together to make sure they cannot get away with it.
[01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:55.000]  We need to be pressuring legislators and everyone else to remove judges and attorneys from the judicial committee.
[01:27:55.000 --> 01:28:04.000]  We need to have randomly drafted individuals just like for jury duty, just like for jury duty.
[01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:18.000]  They need to be randomly picked from the population to serve on these oversight committees of every agency, the police, the judges, the attorneys, the legislators.
[01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  And if you think a legislator doesn't need oversight, you haven't seen one sucking up to a lobbyist yet, I guarantee you.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:34.000]  They need freaking ankle monitors. And what they need is to put ankle monitors on all the lobbyists.
[01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:48.000]  And when those two things on any lobbyist or legislator get within 100 feet of each other, they hit them with 50,000 volts like a taser.
[01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:56.000]  That's what we need. And preferably we strap them around their throats.
[01:28:56.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  So we get well-distributed effect.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:09.000]  But anyway, all right, that being said, we are now going to take calls and see what we've got to do here.
[01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:14.000]  Right now we've got DJ in Ohio. DJ, what do you got?
[01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:17.000]  Hey, how are you doing? Thanks a lot for taking my call.
[01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  All right. So I'll try to be brief. So here in Ohio, I actually I got pulled over very traffic violations for speeding and decided to fight it.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:38.000]  Okay. Hang on, DJ. That's the break music I have to pick up on the other side. Okay.
[01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  So hold on just a minute. We'll let you finish that up.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number. Give us a call, get in line, and we'll get your calls as quickly as we can.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:30:02.000]  We'll be right back. So y'all hold on.
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  When two-bit dictators feel threatened, their standard tactic is to shut down lines of communication.
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  You probably know it's been done in Egypt, but can you guess where else it's happened?
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with the unsettling answer.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:20.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:30.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:30.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:44.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  When Bay Area Rapid Transit or BART police shot and killed a man named Charles Blair Hill for allegedly approaching officers with a knife,
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  a 200-person protest followed. Understandably, in my opinion,
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:31:01.000]  since Hill was not the first person to be fatally shot by trigger-happy BART police.
[01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  A few days later, transit officials got wind that a second protest was being planned,
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  so they took the extraordinary step of shutting down all cell phone service to the station.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  Protesters and commuters alike found themselves in a cell phone dead zone
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:18.000]  with no Internet, no text messages, no dial tone, no nothing.
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  I'm guessing Hosni Mubarak would be proud.
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:26.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:35.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:35.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:42.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.000 --> 01:31:45.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm not a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:31.000]  to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out of town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:11.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:11.000 --> 01:33:40.000]  Hi, folks.
[01:33:40.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  We are back.
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:45.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking to DJ in Ohio.
[01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  All right, DJ, go ahead.
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:50.000]  You said you got pulled over in Ohio.
[01:33:50.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  Yeah, and I got cited for speeding, decided I was going to fight it.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  This is my first endeavor into it.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  Went to the first hearing, and I filed a – well, actually, prior to the hearing, sorry, I filed a motion to dismiss,
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:21.000]  notice of pro se status, and a challenge to jurisdiction.
[01:34:21.000 --> 01:34:23.000]  I filed those, went into the –
[01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  Well, you realize a motion to dismiss and a challenge to jurisdiction should be done synonymously.
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  The court only can dismiss if it lacks jurisdiction.
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  Okay.
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  Well, that's what I was hoping to – I mean, that's what I was hoping to get done the first time I go in there,
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  was to challenge the jurisdiction and have that motion, you know, have that motion ready to go.
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:54.000]  Well, that's what I'm saying, though, they're not separate things.
[01:34:54.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  It is a motion to dismiss, challenge to subject matter jurisdiction or challenge to jurisdiction, generally.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  Okay.
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:11.000]  Because if they have no proper jurisdiction in any of the required areas of jurisdiction,
[01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:18.000]  that's the only thing the court can do, is dismiss.
[01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  Right. So, when I let the judge know that I had submitted a preemptory challenge to jurisdiction,
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:38.000]  the prosecutor complained that he hadn't received any paperwork or anything like that from me,
[01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:45.000]  which I couldn't submit to him since his information wasn't anywhere on the municipal court website.
[01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  The only thing I could do was send it to the court.
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  Well, see, here's the thing.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  You can – whenever they do that, and they do that a lot, they do it here the same way.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:57.000]  You never know who the prosecutor is going to be because they don't tell you.
[01:35:57.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  Right.
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  So, anytime a prosecutor brings that up, say, objection, judge, I filed it with this court, the court,
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  nor anyone else has provided me with any information relating to who will do the prosecution and where to reach them.
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  Therefore, service to the other party would be statutorily and relatively impossible.
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  All righty.
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  Well, like I said, this is the first time that I did this.
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:25.000]  So, I was going in pretty much just on the advice of some people that I trusted.
[01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  But now that you said that, I mean, now I know what to say, and then I'm taking notes.
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:38.000]  So, I went in there, and the prosecutor started complaining that he wasn't served properly, so on and so forth,
[01:36:38.000 --> 01:36:40.000]  asked the judge for seven days.
[01:36:40.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  The judge gave him two weeks, told me to come back in two weeks.
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  I did.
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:50.000]  There was a different judge there.
[01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:59.000]  When I was called up against this different judge, I essentially said the same thing I did in the first –
[01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  the first time I made an appearance, and that judge, the second one, just kind of shouted over me,
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:09.000]  said that I didn't – you know, that they didn't have to prove jurisdiction or anything.
[01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:13.000]  He entered a non-guilty plea, to which I did object.
[01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  I did object to him entering a non-guilty plea for me.
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:23.000]  He said he didn't care that, you know, that I would be able to do whatever I wanted in pretrial,
[01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  that he's going to enter a non-guilty plea and for me to get out of the courtroom.
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:38.000]  So, I – so, I audibly objected, and then I filed an objection to the magistrate entered plea with the clerk.
[01:37:38.000 --> 01:37:48.000]  I was then sent paperwork to appear Thursday, December 3rd, here coming up this Thursday,
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  for a motion hearing, to which I'm assuming – I'm just going to go in and say the same thing again.
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  Okay. Where in Ohio is the statutes that go to the disqualification of a judge?
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:11.000]  Where is that?
[01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:13.000]  I asked you first.
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:16.000]  I – I'm not sure.
[01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  Okay. Well, why don't you know?
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  When a judge refuses to comply with law, why would you let them sit and continue to do anything?
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  That's what this whole show has been about, is a motion to disqualify a judge that refuses to perform their duties under the law
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:38.000]  and to protect the rights of the accused fairly and impartially.
[01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  That's what this whole show has been about.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  Okay. That's something you need to be looking into.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  When a judge says they don't have to prove jurisdiction and he's operating a court of limited jurisdiction, oh, yes, they do.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:39:02.000]  A court of limited jurisdiction has a specific area of jurisdiction which all of their authority is in.
[01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  It does not go outside of that sphere for any reason.
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  Therefore, if a challenge is made that something is occurring outside of that sphere of jurisdiction,
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:19.000]  the judge must prove – or the judge isn't required to prove anything.
[01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:26.000]  The prosecuting attorney on the other side is required to prove that everything is right where it's supposed to be.
[01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:31.000]  The judge has no power to presume jurisdiction, none.
[01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:42.000]  His jurisdiction is not invoked by himself. It is invoked by the pleadings of the prosecutor as to the jurisdiction of the court.
[01:39:42.000 --> 01:39:50.000]  When the prosecutor files no pleadings, there is no jurisdictional facts entered on the record.
[01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  The court does not get to presume it.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  And any judge that does so is acting in violation of law and your right of due process, and you move to disqualify them.
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:10.000]  You need to find the statutes that provide you with the means of doing so.
[01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:20.000]  And in addition to disqualifying the judge, you're going to move that every order or ruling made by that judge is declared void.
[01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  Because the judge made them without any jurisdiction existing in the record.
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  Follow?
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:36.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  All righty. So I need to look at the Ohio statutes to disqualify, and then the second one is move to – I'm sorry.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:59.000]  Not only to disqualify, but move to declare all rulings and orders by that judge void for acting without jurisdiction.
[01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:08.000]  First rule of litigation, if you don't know your rights, you don't have any.
[01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  All righty.
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:16.000]  Okay. I got everything down. I will get to work.
[01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  Thank you, sir.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  You're welcome. Good luck.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:21.000]  All right. Thanks a lot. Bye-bye.
[01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  Bye-bye. All right. Now we're going to go to Spencer in Washington. Spencer, what do you got?
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  Hey, Eddie. I just want to – I want to give a big thank you for you starting my journey, starting my fight here.
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  I didn't really tune in much until I got a recent traffic infraction, which I actually went to court for today.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:51.000]  But I want to – I want to give you a big thanks for giving me the power to fight here.
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:58.000]  And I want to know where I should start. You know, I've been clueless for so many years.
[01:41:58.000 --> 01:41:59.000]  What was the charge?
[01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:03.000]  You really opened my eyes. This was Eddie.
[01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:09.000]  Okay. In Washington state, speeding is a civil infraction, is it not?
[01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:11.000]  I believe it is, yes.
[01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  Okay. Did the officer stop you on the highway?
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:18.000]  He – yes, he stopped me at the interstate.
[01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  Did he ask your permission and consent to stop you and detain you?
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  I did not ask to leave, so I would assume therefore I, by default, accepted it.
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:37.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. You're not listening to my question and you're not answering my question.
[01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:43.000]  Did he ask you for your consent to detain you?
[01:42:43.000 --> 01:42:45.000]  No, he did not.
[01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  Okay. Nor did you challenge, based upon what you've already said so far, his authority to detain you?
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  Correct.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:01.000]  You have the script, right?
[01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:03.000]  Yes, I do, and that's what –
[01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:12.000]  Okay. Tell me one of the first few things the script tells you to find out from the officer.
[01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  Was what evidence –
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:15.000]  No, no, no, no, no.
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  – probable cause he has.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  That's in order to stop you. But probable cause only applies to crimes, doesn't it?
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  Correct.
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  So if this is a civil infraction, we're not talking about a crime, are we?
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  No, we are not.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:40.000]  Okay. So other than probable cause, am I under arrest or am I free to go? See how that works?
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  That was a huge mistake on my part.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  Okay. Hang on just a second and we'll let you tell us what the rest of them were when we get right back, okay?
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:59.000]  All right, folks. 512-646-1984. Give us a call, get a line. We'll be right back.
[01:43:59.000 --> 01:44:03.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:03.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Sorry.
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:07.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  What?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:40.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries
[01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:50.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:15.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:15.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  Thank you.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:58.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:00.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:05.000]  Well, looks like we lost our caller, so I'm just going to pick up with the next one we got in line,
[01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:07.000]  and that is Spencer.
[01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  Spencer, what do you got?
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:12.000]  Yeah, I'm back here.
[01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:15.000]  Okay, what do you got?
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:17.000]  I'm the last caller.
[01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:18.000]  Yeah, I got it.
[01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:24.000]  It just changed the way you're reading on my page, so I don't see it the way I saw it before.
[01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  But go ahead.
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  Finish what you were saying.
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:33.000]  Well, you were going on about civil case previously.
[01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:41.000]  Yeah, on the transportation script, you ask them, am I under arrest or am I free to go?
[01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:47.000]  If this is a civil infraction and he tells you you are not free to go, the presumption is you're under arrest.
[01:47:47.000 --> 01:47:53.000]  They cannot arrest or detain you for a civil infraction.
[01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:57.000]  They can only do that for criminal acts.
[01:47:57.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  You got it?
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:00.000]  Yeah.
[01:48:00.000 --> 01:48:07.000]  The fact that the officer stopped you in your locomotion means he arrested you in your liberty.
[01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:11.000]  You were not free to leave of your own volition, correct?
[01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:12.000]  Correct.
[01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  Okay.
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  The problem is you didn't establish that clearly for the record by asking those two questions.
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:22.000]  Correct.
[01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:23.000]  All right.
[01:48:23.000 --> 01:48:32.000]  You do that all the time, every time when you're encountering a police officer, period.
[01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:33.000]  Okay?
[01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:44.000]  Now, because the arrest was unlawful, everything that comes after that is fruit of the poison tree.
[01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  Okay?
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:54.000]  If the arrest was unlawful, the issuance of the citation for a civil infraction was unlawful.
[01:48:54.000 --> 01:48:56.000]  Okay?
[01:48:56.000 --> 01:49:04.000]  In the case of a civil infraction, how can they put you in a court with a fine when by civil infraction,
[01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  by any civil action, they would have to show that you first violated a contractual duty and provide proof of that?
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  But they can't do that if they acted illegally to incur that duty.
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:28.000]  See the problem?
[01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:34.000]  Yes. Yes, I definitely do.
[01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  In a case of a civil infraction, the officer arresting you at your liberty was unlawful and illegal.
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:50.000]  Indeed.
[01:49:50.000 --> 01:50:00.000]  So you need to move for a dismissal and you need to move to suppress any evidence or testimony submitted by the officer as fruit of the poison tree.
[01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:06.000]  That's what's called, fruit of the poison tree.
[01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  Awesome.
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:13.000]  That makes everything sound very, very easy at this point.
[01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  Technically, it is fairly easy.
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  Now, don't expect them to do it, but when you documented that they were required to do it and failed to do so,
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:27.000]  they're not going to have anywhere to hide when you come back after them.
[01:50:27.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  Correct. Yep.
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  And folks, I'm going to tell you right up, it is imperative that we start getting knowledgeable about how to go after them
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:50.000]  because this will never stop as long as there are no repercussions to them individually and personally.
[01:50:50.000 --> 01:51:06.000]  And the thing is here with what I'm doing with the transportation code, that is exactly what it's going to be, individually and personally.
[01:51:06.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  So with that in mind, Spence, what's your course of action?
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:22.000]  Today, of course, I went in with – I need to find that statute where that is, of course.
[01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  Well, first thing you need to look in is whatever is construed as your penal code up there where it defines what's a crime and what's not a crime.
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  Okay. And if it's not in the penal code that an infraction is not a crime because it fails to list infractions as any category of crime,
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:48.000]  then it's a clear-cut case that it's not in the penal code, nor is it any other code as a criminal act.
[01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:53.000]  Therefore, what's the decision? You may have to look up some case law if it's not specifically written somewhere,
[01:51:53.000 --> 01:52:02.000]  but I'm pretty sure in Washington State, it is clearly written in the statute that infractions are civil.
[01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  Yes.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:14.000]  And in fact, in Washington State, RCW – I forget what the provision is.
[01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  There's a specific provision in the RCW that says everything relating to motor vehicles is 100% commercial.
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:27.000]  It doesn't apply to anything else.
[01:52:27.000 --> 01:52:36.000]  Washington is actually one of the easiest states in the world to defend a traffic ticket in for those two reasons alone.
[01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:39.000]  It's 41.61.
[01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:41.000]  Okay. I didn't see. You already know.
[01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:42.000]  5.61.
[01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:46.000]  Which the officer is required to know, is he not?
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:47.000]  He is.
[01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  Did the officer ask any questions about whether or not you were engaged in any commercial use of the highway or other commercial activity on the highway?
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:52:57.000]  He did not.
[01:52:57.000 --> 01:53:05.000]  Then he failed to conduct a proper investigation with the intention of defrauding the public through his actions.
[01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  My infraction actually has a checkmark for commercial, and he marked no on that.
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:16.000]  Right. And he knows that that can't be possible in Washington.
[01:53:16.000 --> 01:53:24.000]  And if he doesn't, he shouldn't be out there attempting to enforce it.
[01:53:24.000 --> 01:53:34.000]  Correct.
[01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  So instead of throwing a Hail Mary, just look him in the eye and say, go to Hail Mary.
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:43.000]  Yes. Yes.
[01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  I wish I could use those words in court, but I'm sure the judge would.
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  Hey, the judge doesn't have any jurisdiction.
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:52.000]  What can he do to you?
[01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:55.000]  True. I can say whatever I want.
[01:53:55.000 --> 01:54:00.000]  Pretty much. He's just a dude in a big room at that point.
[01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  Yep. Just doing his job.
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:18.000]  Well, mind your P's and Q's, of course, but the point is no jurisdiction, no criminal act, no right to stop. The arrest was illegal. Everything is suppressible as inadmissible as fruit of the poison tree.
[01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:24.000]  All right. Thank you. That is a lot of help. That puts a lot of courage in me, too.
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  Well, good. Glad to be of help.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:41.000]  Thank you. Thank you so much, Eddie. And, you know, hopefully, hopefully there's more followers here in Washington that can chime in and we can possibly start a group up here. That would be awesome.
[01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  Yeah, I'm hoping if I ever one of these days manage to get that damn website launched, one of the tools we're going to have is the ability to set up groups in specific areas for people to work together on things like this.
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:55:00.000]  That's one of my main goals for this.
[01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:03.000]  Awesome.
[01:55:03.000 --> 01:55:09.000]  Well, if you need any help with that, there's plenty of us followers that will probably help chip in there.
[01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:24.000]  All right. Well, I appreciate that. Well, like I say, you can always keep us in the donation finances and things like that because every little bit of that helps us with the other things we need so we can try and dedicate some time to doing it and even pay somebody if we need somebody to do it.
[01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:33.000]  All right. Well, you you take care and enjoy your night here. All right. All right. Thanks for calling in, Spencer.
[01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  Bye. Bye. All right. We got one caller left and that is truth. Raider truth. Raider. You have two minutes.
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:48.000]  Hello.
[01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:55.000]  Raider, if you don't start talking, I'm going to start cutting. Let's go.
[01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:59.000]  Well, all right, I guess I covered that portion a little bit too clearly.
[01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:04.000]  All right, folks, I want to thank everyone. This has been our Monday night show.
[01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:19.000]  And please keep us in all of your prayers as far as, you know, donations, funding of the network, the things that we need, the lawsuit that I've got coming up here to try to get filed against the city of Austin in the state of Texas, because it has ballooned.
[01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:38.000]  Now, not simply into one regarding my two cars, but one to challenge the constitutionality of the entire code to the benefit of every person that's ever gotten a ticket of any kind under the authority of the transportation code.
[01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:51.000]  That means red light cameras. That means speed cameras. That means cops with radar, lidar, general bad dispositions, everything.
[01:56:51.000 --> 01:57:07.000]  Now imagine what this would do for people like the family of Sandra Bland to open up the area to sue the Department of Public Safety and that officer directly and personally for his actions that resulted in her death at the jail.
[01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:13.000]  Because he never had the authority to stop her in the first place.
[01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:22.000]  But then again, the video proves he never had the authority to detain her in the first place.
[01:57:22.000 --> 01:57:27.000]  If we don't do something, America's done.
[01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  Completely, totally done.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:37.000]  It is time to stop being afraid.
[01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:45.000]  It is time to stop waiting on someone else to give us courage.
[01:57:45.000 --> 01:57:55.000]  We need to get together, stand together, act together and save our country so that we can save ourselves.
[01:57:55.000 --> 01:58:05.000]  And the only way we can do that is to want everyone else's rights and freedoms to be as equally protected as our own.
[01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  We fail in that. We fail in everything.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:13.000]  All right, folks. Once again, I want to thank you all for listening and for calling.
[01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  Please keep us again in your finances when and where you're able.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:22.000]  Donate on the website and just designate where you want it to go.
[01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  You can only donate to me on the Rule of Law Radio website under the donations tab.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  But please go there if you can and make a donation to the lawsuit.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:35.000]  Once again, thank you all. Have a great week and great holidays.
[01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Good night and God bless.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:02.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosradioNetwork.com.