[00:00.000 --> 00:10.000] The following use Flash and Squatch UI, the Lone Star Lowdown. Providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market. [00:10.000 --> 00:18.000] Today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [00:18.000 --> 00:29.000] Markets for the 14th of October, 2013, opened up with gold at $1,183.91 an ounce. [00:29.000 --> 00:35.000] Silver, $16.14 an ounce. Texas crude, $46.66 a barrel. [00:35.000 --> 00:39.000] And Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 254 US currency. [00:39.000 --> 00:56.000] Today in history, Thursday, October 14, 1773, the Peggy Stewart, a cargo vessel, was burned in Annapolis as punishment for violating the boycott on British tea imports. [00:56.000 --> 01:03.000] These tea restrictions had been imposed in retaliation to the British military's treatment of the people of Boston following the Boston Tea Party. [01:03.000 --> 01:10.000] This act became known as the Annapolis Tea Party. [01:10.000 --> 01:20.000] In recent news, the Danish safety board released the findings of their investigation into Malaysia Airlines flight MH17, which crashed in the Ukraine July 17, 2014. [01:20.000 --> 01:27.000] The safety board determined that a book surface-to-air missile was used to take down the airline, which killed 298 passengers on board. [01:27.000 --> 01:39.000] Manufactured by a Russian state-controlled weapons firm, Almaz-Anti, the book warhead was launched from a mobile missile system requiring specialized training of radar and missile locking systems. [01:39.000 --> 01:45.000] The Danish safety board isn't pointing any fingers, and both Ukrainian and Russian officials have been accusing the other of culpability. [01:45.000 --> 01:58.000] Investigators were able to use info obtained from the blast radius, missile fragments, and explosive compound swabbed from the wreckage to identify the 9N314M, or book missile, as the culprit. [02:02.000 --> 02:13.000] Texan by Nature, a movement in citizen conservation headed up by former First Lady Laura Bush, is reaching out to all Texas private landowners to inform them on techniques they can implement to conserve their own property. [02:13.000 --> 02:19.000] The group recently hosted a monarch butterfly event at the George W. Bush Presidential Center on the SMU campus. [02:19.000 --> 02:27.000] They have kickstarted initiatives out of all the different partners across the state to encourage people to use native plants and to conserve our land. [02:27.000 --> 02:43.000] The group is also encouraging the fracking industry to save the ground dirt that gets displaced in the process of oil extraction through a project in the Eagle Ford Shale area. [02:43.000 --> 02:58.000] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. If you have applied for a service that you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give us a call at 210-363-2257. This has been your Lowdown for October 14, 2015. [03:13.000 --> 03:23.000] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. If you have applied for a service that you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give us a call at 210-363-2257. [03:43.000 --> 03:52.000] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. If you have applied for a service that you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give us a call at 210-363-2257. [03:52.000 --> 04:03.000] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. If you have applied for a service that you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give us a call at 210-363-2257. [04:03.000 --> 04:27.000] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. If you have applied for a service that you'd like to advertise with us, feel free to give us a call at 210-363-2257. [04:33.000 --> 04:44.000] My name is Eddie Craig. It is November 23, 2015. It'd be really nice if we could get more people in this class downtown, learning what's going on. [04:44.000 --> 05:00.000] Because as these weeks are progressing, the information is becoming more and more solid in proving the fraud that so much of this is and the way that it needs to be dealt with. [05:00.000 --> 05:16.000] Now, those of you that were listening to the show last week and the week before, you heard about the hope, the motion that I have written challenging the constitutionality of the enactment of the transportation code in 1995 through SB 971, [05:16.000 --> 05:30.000] which was passed in an unconstitutional manner, through illegal and unconstitutional suspension of mandatory procedural rules on how laws are to be passed in Texas. [05:30.000 --> 05:40.000] Now, for those of you out there in different states, might I suggest that you become an expert in your state constitution? [05:40.000 --> 05:54.000] Might I also suggest that you concentrate on several areas specifically, the Bill of Rights and the way that your legislative department is created, [05:54.000 --> 06:04.000] and then find the other clause that deals with separation of powers and then look at all the various ways that the Bill of Rights, [06:04.000 --> 06:13.000] the separation of powers, and the method and manner in which laws in your particular state are required to be created are being violated. [06:13.000 --> 06:25.000] Now, that being said, there are several things that I am trying to get this week that are going to cost me some money, guaranteed they're going to cost me some money because they're certified copies. [06:25.000 --> 06:37.000] But I have a whole list of things I'm going to be asking for in relation to SB 971 and my arguments relating to SB 971. [06:37.000 --> 06:42.000] And I'm going to tell you what that list of things is, okay? [06:42.000 --> 06:52.000] I am going to be asking, in addition to the certified copies of SB 971 dealing with page 2160 and 2161, that's what I currently have, [06:52.000 --> 06:58.000] I am going to get a certified copy of page 1 of SB 971. [06:58.000 --> 07:06.000] I am going to get a certified copy of Article 1, Section 29 of the Texas Constitution, 1876 version, [07:06.000 --> 07:17.000] and Article 3, Sections 1, 29 through 39, 49A, 56, and 62 of the 1876 Constitution. [07:17.000 --> 07:34.000] And then I am going to see if the Texas Register's office can provide me with a certified list of all legislative enactments that were passed by any legislature [07:34.000 --> 07:46.000] where Article 3, Section 32, the Reading and Discussion Procedural Rule, were suspended in order to pass the bill. [07:46.000 --> 07:51.000] Now, the reason we want this list is very simple. [07:51.000 --> 08:06.000] We want to be able to show every piece of legislation that was enacted by any legislature in violation of the Reading and Discussion Rule, [08:06.000 --> 08:22.000] specifically certain pieces of legislation that have created the huge shift and transfer of power from the people to people it should never have been granted to in the first place. [08:22.000 --> 08:38.000] Let's say, for example, that we go back and we find that in 1939 the legislature created the State Bar Act by suspending the procedural rule in Article 3, Section 32, [08:38.000 --> 08:43.000] requiring that that bill be read and discussed on the floor of each house. [08:43.000 --> 08:57.000] Now, we already have one major constitutional problem with it. 89% of one house and 49% of the other house in 1939 were attorneys. [08:57.000 --> 09:13.000] And none of them, not a single one, acted under Article 3 to recuse themselves from voting on the legislation that created the State Bar Act, even though it is a mandatory procedural rule [09:13.000 --> 09:27.000] that any legislature or legislative member having an interest of any kind in the outcome of a bill must recuse themselves from voting, and they did not do it. [09:27.000 --> 09:30.000] That's problem number one with the Bar Act. [09:30.000 --> 09:48.000] Problem number two, if they suspended the reading of that act on the floor of each house, then it was passed in violation of Article 3, Section 62, which only allows the suspension of those rules in a declared state of emergency. [09:48.000 --> 10:01.000] And the method and type of emergency by which this is done is spelled out very, very clearly in Article 3, Section 62, [10:01.000 --> 10:19.000] which is the state of emergency must be the result of disasters caused or related to an ongoing or prior enemy or imminent enemy attack. [10:19.000 --> 10:35.000] Okay, so it has to be a state of emergency declared by the governor, signed off on by the person or the speaker of each house of the legislature that states a declaration of emergency [10:35.000 --> 10:52.000] related to disasters resulting from a past, ongoing, or imminent enemy attack. Now I don't know how you would get a disaster related to an imminent enemy attack. Since it hadn't happened yet, how could a disaster have resulted from it? [10:52.000 --> 11:08.000] Technically speaking, imminent is not in there. So it has to, the language says relating to an enemy attack, which would leave us with not imminent, but with past or present, ongoing. [11:08.000 --> 11:21.000] The imminent part language is used in relation to relocating the seat of government specifically, but not to the suspension of the procedural rules. You got it? [11:21.000 --> 11:33.000] So it's divided up into three categories of emergency, but which thing gets changed is relevant to which state the emergency results from. [11:33.000 --> 11:52.000] Okay, so imminent attack relates only to the relocation of the seat of government from Austin to someplace else designated by the governor for that purpose, but it has nothing to do with the suspension of the procedural rules. [11:52.000 --> 12:06.000] So if they passed the State Bar Act in 1939, what was the state of emergency that was related to a past or ongoing enemy attack that was occurring in 1939? [12:06.000 --> 12:25.000] I can't find a newspaper article, a news story, or any publication that verifies in any way that Texas was suffering from any form of enemy attack in 1939. None. [12:25.000 --> 12:38.000] Okay, so where would the authority to do the suspension to pass the State Bar Act come from if the State Bar Bill was indeed suspended in its required reading on the floor of each house? [12:38.000 --> 12:56.000] If it was, then it was unconstitutionally passed on two provisions rather than just the one, which was the required recusal of themselves from voting if they had an actual interest in the outcome of the bill. [12:56.000 --> 13:14.000] So there are multiple challenges that we may be able to make, but even if it's not just the State Bar Act or the State Bar Act at all, there will most likely be numerous enactments by the legislature that violated these requirements. [13:14.000 --> 13:29.000] And I intend to find out what each and every one of them are. And I am going to see if that information is tracked and organized by the Texas Register's office. [13:29.000 --> 13:40.000] And they're the people that are responsible for maintaining the Texas Register and all the stuff the legislature is supposed to enter into the Texas Register, and they're the ones that can provide us with certified copies of this information. [13:40.000 --> 13:57.000] So if they provide me with a certified list of all of the legislation that was suspended in reading and discussion under Section 32 of Article 3, we now know every enactment that we can attack on a constitutional grounds. [13:57.000 --> 14:15.000] I am almost dead positive we are going to find that this will be true for every code that currently exists in Texas, because all of them went through a recodification process, and all of them are thousands of pages long. [14:15.000 --> 14:27.000] Therefore, I'm willing to bet they were all declared an emergency for the purpose of passing them without reading them in the same manner the transportation code was. [14:27.000 --> 14:55.000] Now, in relation to that argument, there is something else that needs to be addressed about how the courts at the appellate level, as well as the trial level, are handling the arguments relating to transportation in these cases, because the appellate courts are knowingly, they can't even begin to convince me it's not knowingly, committing fraud in the way they address the facts of the case. [14:55.000 --> 15:00.000] And we're about to go to break here, so I'm not going to get into that right this segment. [15:00.000 --> 15:06.000] I'm going to start it up on the next segment so I have time to get to you, or get through it before I have to start taking calls. [15:06.000 --> 15:21.000] But needless to say, when we get into the discussion on that, we're going to find out that the courts are ignoring a constitutional provision relating to every single bill that gets enacted. [15:21.000 --> 15:29.000] And that is that every bill must deal with only one subject. [15:29.000 --> 15:40.000] It used to be object, but it is authorized by the Constitution to now be encompassing a particular subject. [15:40.000 --> 15:48.000] The subject in this particular case, we will learn about through the language of the act itself. [15:48.000 --> 15:53.000] And then we're going to see how the courts fail to address it. [15:53.000 --> 16:13.000] And when we do, we're going to have our eyes open to how this system has stayed in place through fraudulent rulings by people that we entrust to know better and don't, or know better and refuse to acknowledge it. [16:13.000 --> 16:26.000] Either way, they are liable for the harm they have perpetrated against the people of Texas for their failure to perform their duty in protecting our rights. [16:26.000 --> 16:40.000] And we need to be willing and knowledgeable about how that occurred and learning how it happened in a way that we can do something about it and then getting together and doing something about it. [16:40.000 --> 16:54.000] So that being said, when we get back, we're going to go into the language of the bill, SB 971, in the first paragraph, and I'm going to show you exactly what the appellate courts are ignoring that we need to be hammering them on. [16:54.000 --> 17:00.000] Y'all hang in there. We'll be right back. [17:00.000 --> 17:11.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [17:11.000 --> 17:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [17:17.000 --> 17:25.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [17:25.000 --> 17:31.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [17:31.000 --> 17:39.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [17:39.000 --> 17:47.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [17:47.000 --> 17:51.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [17:51.000 --> 18:00.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now. [18:00.000 --> 18:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses? [18:05.000 --> 18:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [18:09.000 --> 18:14.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too. [18:14.000 --> 18:24.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, [18:24.000 --> 18:34.000] how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:34.000 --> 18:38.000] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:38.000 --> 18:49.000] Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [18:49.000 --> 19:00.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next. [19:00.000 --> 19:10.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:10.000 --> 19:38.000] Alright, folks, we are back. [19:38.000 --> 19:41.000] In fact, this is Rule of Law Radio. [19:41.000 --> 19:43.000] Alright. [19:43.000 --> 19:56.000] Now, what I want you to understand here is how this was set up and what it entails so that you will know the fraud for what it is. [19:56.000 --> 19:58.000] I don't want anybody taking my word for it. [19:58.000 --> 20:02.000] I want you to be able to understand this on your own. [20:02.000 --> 20:08.000] I'm just going to read what's actually in the language of the bill. [20:08.000 --> 20:23.000] This is the way that in 1995, the title, which is the paragraph, the very top paragraph of the bill that describes its purpose, the title of the bill reads thusly, [20:23.000 --> 20:43.000] SB 971, a bill to be entitled an act relating to the adoption of a non-substantive revisions of statutes relating to transportation, including conforming amendments, repeals, and penalties. [20:43.000 --> 20:58.000] So right there, we have the subject matter that the bill itself deals with, a recodification of statutes dealing with transportation. [20:58.000 --> 21:05.000] That tells us right there that all of the original Vernon civil statutes were relating to transportation. [21:05.000 --> 21:14.000] They weren't for everybody. They were only for those that were engaged in the subject matter of transportation. [21:14.000 --> 21:16.000] Alright. [21:16.000 --> 21:20.000] That's the part you need to understand. [21:20.000 --> 21:25.000] Now, let me show you something else. [21:25.000 --> 21:32.000] Section 35 of Article 3 of the Texas Constitution, subjects and titles of bills. [21:32.000 --> 21:47.000] A, no bill except general appropriations bills, which may embrace the various subjects and accounts for and on account of which monies are appropriated, shall contain more than one subject. [21:47.000 --> 22:11.000] So we know right there that SB 971 is telling us that it is recodifying one subject, and that subject is transportation, which has nothing to do with you and me going around in our private automobiles. [22:11.000 --> 22:13.000] Period. [22:13.000 --> 22:20.000] Now remember, the term transportation is not defined in the recodification anywhere. [22:20.000 --> 22:26.000] It's not defined in any code in all of Texas. [22:26.000 --> 22:31.000] It's not defined in Vernon's that I can find. [22:31.000 --> 22:34.000] But that doesn't mean there isn't a definition. [22:34.000 --> 22:40.000] It just means there isn't a statutory definition put in place by the legislature. [22:40.000 --> 22:46.000] So what are the rules of determining the meanings of words in law? [22:46.000 --> 22:56.000] We go back to the hierarchy that I first introduced on this show, and that is the statute itself is number one. [22:56.000 --> 23:10.000] Failing that because they tell you that in any law, if the law does not define the term, then you resort to the common meaning of the term. [23:10.000 --> 23:20.000] But you have to remember that you are talking about a term used in law, not in common English, but in law. [23:20.000 --> 23:27.000] Therefore, the hierarchy is not the statute and then Webster's or American heritage. [23:27.000 --> 23:40.000] The hierarchy is the statute, the legal dictionary, and failing that, the regular dictionary. [23:40.000 --> 23:43.000] Now why do I say the legal dictionary? [23:43.000 --> 23:58.000] Because the legal dictionary definition is based upon court cases that made the determination of what the term or phrase meant in the law itself. [23:58.000 --> 24:04.000] So when they tell you we are going to fall back to the common meaning if it's not in the statute, [24:04.000 --> 24:10.000] they mean the common meaning in law because that's where it's being used. [24:10.000 --> 24:20.000] And only if the law itself through either the statute or the courts has failed to define the term, [24:20.000 --> 24:29.000] then and only then do you resort to the common English meaning of the term. [24:29.000 --> 24:44.000] If this hierarchy was not true, then why will a court not accept the definition found in a regular dictionary as evidence of the definition in law? [24:44.000 --> 25:00.000] Why would a legal dictionary have to exist if it was not for the purpose of creating definitions that hold a different meaning than that found in the common English usage? [25:00.000 --> 25:04.000] Because it is different. [25:04.000 --> 25:16.000] So now that you understand that it is different, let's look at, once again, we know that the subject matter here by the very language of the bill is transportation. [25:16.000 --> 25:21.000] And when we go to Black's Law or to Bouvier's, we can find the definition. [25:21.000 --> 25:27.000] But we have to understand that through the course of history and time, the definition in law will change as well. [25:27.000 --> 25:32.000] In Bouvier's 1856, the definition of transportation is only one thing. [25:32.000 --> 25:38.000] The transporting of prisoners, criminals, to a penal colony. [25:38.000 --> 25:40.000] That's it. [25:40.000 --> 25:46.000] But in Black's Law, we find that it's got a different definition. [25:46.000 --> 25:55.000] Black's Law 1 has the definition that Bouvier's has, but it added the definition of commerce. [25:55.000 --> 26:08.000] And then as that progressed, the courts have expanded the meaning of transportation with more words, but with the same ending result. [26:08.000 --> 26:24.000] It was a single word in Black's 1, commerce, but now it is in Black's Law 6, for instance, the movement of person's goods or property from one place to another by a carrier. [26:24.000 --> 26:27.000] Well, what is a carrier? [26:27.000 --> 26:42.000] Well, a carrier is defined in Black's Law as someone engaging in the business of transporting person's goods or property from point A to point B for a fee or a cost. [26:42.000 --> 26:44.000] So it's a business. [26:44.000 --> 26:47.000] It's someone engaging in a business. [26:47.000 --> 26:55.000] Here in the Texas SB 971 enactment, we actually have the following sections that are in it. [26:55.000 --> 26:57.000] All right? [26:57.000 --> 27:01.000] Under Title I, you have Chapter I, which is the general provisions. [27:01.000 --> 27:07.000] Then it skips from Chapter I to Chapter V, okay? [27:07.000 --> 27:10.000] And Chapters II and IV were reserved for expansion. [27:10.000 --> 27:18.000] Chapter V is titled, Duties and Liabilities of Common Carriers. [27:18.000 --> 27:22.000] Chapter VI, Sale of Unclaimed Goods. [27:22.000 --> 27:26.000] Chapter VII, Connecting Carriers. [27:26.000 --> 27:34.000] Chapter VIII, Protecting Movement of Commerce with 9 through 19 chapters reserved for expansion. [27:34.000 --> 27:38.000] Chapter XX, Miscellaneous Provisions. [27:38.000 --> 27:40.000] Okay? [27:40.000 --> 28:01.000] So since every single chapter, whether at the original date of enactment or later expanded, is limited to the single subject of transportation, then nothing in this code can be applied to any activity that is not transportation. [28:01.000 --> 28:08.000] The logic and the legal basis for that logic could not be simpler. [28:08.000 --> 28:18.000] But then again, neither can be your attorneys or your judges and their ability to think beyond the money they can steal. [28:18.000 --> 28:20.000] Their thinking is very simple. [28:20.000 --> 28:22.000] We don't care what the law means. [28:22.000 --> 28:23.000] We don't care what the law says. [28:23.000 --> 28:28.000] We're going to pretend it means what we want it to mean, and we're going to presume that, whether we can prove it or not, [28:28.000 --> 28:32.000] and we're going to convict you and steal your money anyway. [28:32.000 --> 28:38.000] In other words, we're going to work together as a criminal conspiracy and organize criminal activity, [28:38.000 --> 28:57.000] engaging in a criminal enterprise for the purpose of defrauding the public and stealing your money, your rights, and your liberty and the use of your property in order to enrich the entity we call the state. [28:57.000 --> 29:02.000] That's where you are, ladies and gentlemen, like it or not. [29:02.000 --> 29:12.000] And until you decide to wake up, stand up, use your voice, and to group up with people of a like mind, [29:12.000 --> 29:33.000] and stand together to fight and to resist what is going on through civil disobedience, through refusing to convict on these idiotic crimes that they have committed out of thin air, this is not going to go away easily. [29:33.000 --> 29:42.000] I can make it where they don't want to talk to you about it or ever get you in their court, but that's not going to solve the problem statewide, is it? [29:42.000 --> 29:49.000] And that's what we need to be working for doing, is getting rid of it so no one can be victimized by it. [29:49.000 --> 29:52.000] And that's going to take all of us. [29:52.000 --> 29:57.000] All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984. [29:57.000 --> 30:02.000] We'll take your calls when I get back. [30:02.000 --> 30:07.000] Thanksgiving is a national holiday here in the U.S., and we celebrate it every November. [30:07.000 --> 30:11.000] But new research says we should apply that attitude of gratitude every day. [30:11.000 --> 30:17.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in just a moment with a few reasons for thinking about thankfulness. [30:17.000 --> 30:19.000] Privacy is under attack. [30:19.000 --> 30:23.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:23.000 --> 30:28.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [30:28.000 --> 30:33.000] Protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [30:33.000 --> 30:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [30:35.000 --> 30:39.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [30:39.000 --> 30:43.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:43.000 --> 30:47.000] Start over with StartPage. [30:47.000 --> 30:50.000] Giving thanks for the good things we get is a healthy habit. [30:50.000 --> 30:55.000] Not only can it improve our mental and physical health, but it can actually extend our lives. [30:55.000 --> 31:03.000] Robert Emmons, an expert on gratitude, had a thousand people write down all the things they were grateful for in a journal every day for three weeks. [31:03.000 --> 31:10.000] Compared to the general public, these grateful people had stronger immune systems, fewer aches and pains, and lower blood pressure. [31:10.000 --> 31:17.000] They also reported more joy, optimism, and happiness, and not surprisingly, their social relationships improved. [31:17.000 --> 31:22.000] Emmons recommends counting your blessings on a daily basis to keep the blues at bay. [31:22.000 --> 31:24.000] What are you grateful for today? [31:24.000 --> 31:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:54.000 --> 32:02.000] For more space, time, and money, call 888-910-4367 or visit nsa.org. [32:02.000 --> 32:06.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [32:06.000 --> 32:11.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [32:11.000 --> 32:14.000] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:14.000 --> 32:18.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, [32:18.000 --> 32:21.000] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:21.000 --> 32:26.000] This will afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:26.000 --> 32:29.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:29.000 --> 32:34.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is [32:34.000 --> 32:36.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:36.000 --> 32:41.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:41.000 --> 32:46.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [32:46.000 --> 32:51.000] and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:51.000 --> 32:55.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:55.000 --> 33:00.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:00.000 --> 33:04.000] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:30.000 --> 33:40.000] All right, folks, we are back. [33:40.000 --> 33:48.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984, and we're going to go to Scott in Texas. [33:48.000 --> 33:50.000] Scott, what do you got? [33:50.000 --> 33:52.000] Hey, Eddie, how are you doing tonight? [33:52.000 --> 34:00.000] I just want to let you know everything that you're doing is great and wonderful. [34:00.000 --> 34:08.000] I had, you know, I got a couple of things going on up here in Dallas, but I went and in Rockwall, [34:08.000 --> 34:17.000] I had a motions hearing for not having a driver's license and submitted all the stuff. [34:17.000 --> 34:22.000] Anyhow, basically the DA had nothing. [34:22.000 --> 34:29.000] He was fumbling around, couldn't figure out what to attack, and basically the judge was like, you know, [34:29.000 --> 34:37.000] she basically intervened and was asking me, so what law does, [34:37.000 --> 34:40.000] what law are you saying that this does not pertain to you? [34:40.000 --> 34:43.000] And that kind of threw me off for a little bit. [34:43.000 --> 34:48.000] And by the time I was, you know, I didn't really realize she was really interjecting, [34:48.000 --> 34:56.000] doing the DA's job, and I didn't object, and so she basically was like, [34:56.000 --> 35:01.000] okay, I'm going to dismiss, I'm not going to accept your motion and all that stuff. [35:01.000 --> 35:05.000] Well, this is the part I keep trying to tell folks about being prepared to go in there. [35:05.000 --> 35:09.000] If you don't know the subject, you can't answer those types of questions. [35:09.000 --> 35:11.000] You won't know how to answer them. [35:11.000 --> 35:16.000] But the answer to the question is exactly what I opened the show with. [35:16.000 --> 35:24.000] That question is answered by what I just finished going through. [35:24.000 --> 35:25.000] Okay. [35:25.000 --> 35:29.000] Well, then I'm just listening to everything you just said. [35:29.000 --> 35:37.000] And I would, I mean, basically what I was kind of getting to is the judge can't really interject like that. [35:37.000 --> 35:43.000] Yes, the judge is perfectly capable and allowed to ask questions. [35:43.000 --> 35:49.000] What she isn't allowed to do is to speak to the evidence [35:49.000 --> 35:56.000] or act in a manner prejudicial or biased to either party. [35:56.000 --> 35:59.000] So she was acting in a prejudicial manner? [35:59.000 --> 36:00.000] No. [36:00.000 --> 36:08.000] She wasn't really asking you to explain your legal perspective, she wasn't doing anything of the sort. [36:08.000 --> 36:16.000] If she had said, well, you don't have a clue what you're talking about, and that isn't what the law says, [36:16.000 --> 36:20.000] then she would have been acting like the prosecutor. [36:20.000 --> 36:28.000] Then she would have been acting in a manner prejudicial by speaking to the evidence introduced at trial. [36:28.000 --> 36:30.000] At least in the hearing. [36:30.000 --> 36:31.000] Okay. [36:31.000 --> 36:38.000] So the difference there is what they do in relation to it and how they do it. [36:38.000 --> 36:42.000] But in this particular case, the answer to the question she asked is, [36:42.000 --> 36:49.000] Judge, the subject matter regulated by this code in its very own language of the bill that created it, [36:49.000 --> 36:52.000] which I have a certified copy of right here, [36:52.000 --> 36:59.000] says very clearly that this recodification deals with the subject matter of transportation. [36:59.000 --> 37:08.000] Please define transportation in relation to what's in this code and show me how it applies to me [37:08.000 --> 37:11.000] and my activity of traveling from point A to point B [37:11.000 --> 37:20.000] and not getting paid to move anything or anybody anywhere for any amount of money. [37:20.000 --> 37:22.000] That is the answer to her question. [37:22.000 --> 37:28.000] But in order to make it stick, you've got to have the first paragraph of this bill certified [37:28.000 --> 37:33.000] to prove that that's exactly what it does. [37:33.000 --> 37:35.000] See, that is what I was getting at. [37:35.000 --> 37:40.000] Neither the lower courts nor the appellate courts ever addressed the issue [37:40.000 --> 37:46.000] of the constitutional limitation of a bill to address one subject. [37:46.000 --> 37:56.000] They never discuss in their opinions what the subject of a transportation allegation is limited to. [37:56.000 --> 38:00.000] They never discuss it. [38:00.000 --> 38:06.000] Because if they did, the charges would fall apart. [38:06.000 --> 38:12.000] So we have to present it to them in such a way that they have no choice but to address it. [38:12.000 --> 38:19.000] And no one's done that until my constitutional challenge to the bill as a whole. [38:19.000 --> 38:23.000] Well, what's ironic is I have all your motions and I recommend- [38:23.000 --> 38:26.000] No, you don't have this one because I just finished this one. [38:26.000 --> 38:30.000] This one's going to be separate and apart from all this other stuff. [38:30.000 --> 38:31.000] I realize that. [38:31.000 --> 38:32.000] I heard you last weekend. [38:32.000 --> 38:35.000] I was going to try to come down Sunday, but I just couldn't make it. [38:35.000 --> 38:41.000] But anyhow, I recommend everybody get all the other motions and this motion too [38:41.000 --> 38:45.000] because all the other motions was the one I filed that had them all confounded. [38:45.000 --> 38:50.000] But as you were talking about transportation, when she started going into that, [38:50.000 --> 38:55.000] I was going to start reading the motions in and she's like, no, you don't read it. [38:55.000 --> 38:58.000] Just tell me what page to turn to. [38:58.000 --> 39:02.000] So I started having to flip through all these pages because there were a bunch of them. [39:02.000 --> 39:04.000] But I got to transportation. [39:04.000 --> 39:08.000] I said, okay, page da-da-da-da, where transportation was. [39:08.000 --> 39:11.000] I said, that's where it is, where it doesn't apply to me. [39:11.000 --> 39:15.000] And then she was like, well, show me the law where it does not apply to you. [39:15.000 --> 39:20.000] So she flipped the script on me as what I'm getting at and I didn't and I wasn't- [39:20.000 --> 39:23.000] You should have said, objection, Judge. [39:23.000 --> 39:28.000] The burden of proof is not on me to prove that it doesn't apply. [39:28.000 --> 39:32.000] It is on the prosecutor to prove that it does. [39:32.000 --> 39:33.000] That's correct. [39:33.000 --> 39:37.000] And that's where I flipped the gear. [39:37.000 --> 39:43.000] So, yeah, so basically she threw out those motions. [39:43.000 --> 39:45.000] So now I got to go to trial. [39:45.000 --> 39:48.000] Yeah, well, see, that's exactly what I was talking about. [39:48.000 --> 39:53.000] Both the trial courts and the appellate courts refuse to address the lack of subject matter. [39:53.000 --> 39:58.000] Without the subject matter, there is no subject matter jurisdiction, [39:58.000 --> 40:02.000] which means their actions are without subject matter jurisdiction, [40:02.000 --> 40:06.000] which means they are liable to you if you sue them. [40:06.000 --> 40:14.000] But you've got to know what you're arguing to get it into the record so that that can be done. [40:14.000 --> 40:16.000] Agreed. [40:16.000 --> 40:24.000] The good thing is, is subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged at any time, past, present, or future. [40:24.000 --> 40:31.000] So no matter what they do to you in this trial, you can challenge it again on appeal. [40:31.000 --> 40:34.000] But we're going to short circuit that. [40:34.000 --> 40:38.000] You get in touch with me and get this other motion, and then you're going to file that, [40:38.000 --> 40:44.000] which I'm hoping to have all the copies of everything I need by Wednesday, Thursday at the latest. [40:44.000 --> 40:48.000] We'll see how quick the registered folks down there can get it all together for me. [40:48.000 --> 40:51.000] But I get all the certified copies. [40:51.000 --> 40:56.000] I get them all put into this, and we're good to go. [40:56.000 --> 41:01.000] Sweet, because I got several places to file it already. [41:01.000 --> 41:06.000] Okay, folks, let me let everybody out there know what's going on. [41:06.000 --> 41:12.000] I have finally been able to sit down and get the necessary evidence to show that the transportation code, [41:12.000 --> 41:19.000] as it currently exists, was recodified in 1995 in violation of the Texas Constitution. [41:19.000 --> 41:28.000] The entire code is null and void, not a single letter of any word in any sentence comprising any paragraph [41:28.000 --> 41:36.000] in any chapter of any title is constitutionally valid, not one. [41:36.000 --> 41:42.000] I have the certified documentary evidence that proves that. [41:42.000 --> 41:51.000] I have written a motion based entirely upon that evidence that is a direct constitutional challenge [41:51.000 --> 41:58.000] to both jurisdiction and the allegations under the code itself. [41:58.000 --> 42:05.000] And what we're going to do is attack it in every single court, in every single citation, [42:05.000 --> 42:13.000] and then we need to make very certain that the thing we attack next is every officer that writes a ticket, [42:13.000 --> 42:18.000] every judge that has pursued a prosecution, every prosecutor that has sought one, [42:18.000 --> 42:25.000] because none of them have any jurisdiction and never had jurisdiction to do so. [42:25.000 --> 42:31.000] Therefore, they have no immunity and nowhere to hide. [42:31.000 --> 42:38.000] They are 100% liable for every single dollar they took and every harm they caused [42:38.000 --> 42:45.000] and every minute they stole from you to defend yourself. [42:45.000 --> 42:52.000] And that's what this motion is setting them up for us to go after. [42:52.000 --> 42:58.000] And the nice thing is, if it's unconstitutional, it doesn't matter if your ticket was 10 years ago, [42:58.000 --> 43:01.000] you can challenge it and you can force them to pay you back. [43:01.000 --> 43:08.000] And you can sue them because you just became aware of the fraud that they perpetrated against you. [43:08.000 --> 43:16.000] And fraud doesn't have a statute of limitations until the fraud becomes known. [43:16.000 --> 43:17.000] Okay? [43:17.000 --> 43:25.000] So now that you know they committed fraud, you've got two years to sue them to recover for that fraud, [43:25.000 --> 43:30.000] as well as get your money back for what they did in the first place. [43:30.000 --> 43:31.000] So think about that. [43:31.000 --> 43:37.000] This new motion is 100 bucks because it's costing me an arm and a leg to get all the certified pages [43:37.000 --> 43:39.000] that I need to go with it. [43:39.000 --> 43:42.000] So I need to recoup that, all right? [43:42.000 --> 43:44.000] And I need to do it soon. [43:44.000 --> 43:48.000] So as soon as this is ready, it's going to be available for public consumption. [43:48.000 --> 43:54.000] I'll try to get it set up where you can order it off the website or some other means, however we do this. [43:54.000 --> 43:56.000] But I'll let you know as soon as I got it ready. [43:56.000 --> 43:57.000] All right, folks. [43:57.000 --> 43:58.000] We'll be right back after the break. [43:58.000 --> 44:00.000] Hang on, Scott. [44:00.000 --> 44:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [44:04.000 --> 44:08.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, [44:08.000 --> 44:15.000] easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [44:15.000 --> 44:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [44:19.000 --> 44:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [44:23.000 --> 44:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too. [44:28.000 --> 44:34.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:34.000 --> 44:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [44:39.000 --> 44:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:43.000 --> 44:49.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [44:49.000 --> 45:04.000] pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [45:04.000 --> 45:10.000] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come buy our store at [45:10.000 --> 45:19.000] 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D, here in Austin, Texas, behind Brave New Books and Chase Bank, to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [45:23.000 --> 45:31.000] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our all-shellium emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [45:31.000 --> 45:44.000] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. [45:44.000 --> 46:02.000] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com. [46:14.000 --> 46:42.000] All right, folks, we are back. [46:42.000 --> 46:47.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984. [46:47.000 --> 46:50.000] We are talking to Scott in Texas. [46:50.000 --> 46:52.000] All right, Scott, please continue. [46:52.000 --> 46:55.000] Well, that was basically about it. [46:55.000 --> 46:57.000] Now I got another, I'll deal with that one. [46:57.000 --> 46:58.000] That was in Rockwall. [46:58.000 --> 47:00.000] That was a little municipal court. [47:00.000 --> 47:07.000] And then I got my biggie one that, the infamous one that's coming up for the motions hearing, December 1st. [47:07.000 --> 47:13.000] So now I'm a little bit better prepared and know to always deflect everything over to the state. [47:13.000 --> 47:19.000] The state has to make the transportation stick and how they can show that it's applicable to me. [47:19.000 --> 47:21.000] So I'm feeling... [47:21.000 --> 47:22.000] No, no, no. [47:22.000 --> 47:24.000] You're not listening, are you? [47:24.000 --> 47:25.000] Would you? [47:25.000 --> 47:29.000] How to screw that up? [47:29.000 --> 47:38.000] If you do a constitutional challenge to the enactment itself, there is no transportation, there is no code. [47:38.000 --> 47:42.000] There's nothing to charge you with. [47:42.000 --> 47:45.000] So you're saying going in on your motion, though, right? [47:45.000 --> 47:46.000] Yes. [47:46.000 --> 47:47.000] Well, okay. [47:47.000 --> 47:48.000] Well, I don't have that yet. [47:48.000 --> 47:49.000] I understand that. [47:49.000 --> 47:51.000] But by the time you go in, you will. [47:51.000 --> 47:57.000] And when you go back to the one that you just got your motions hearing done in, you're going to file it again. [47:57.000 --> 48:04.000] Because remember, challenges to jurisdiction can be heard and raised at any time. [48:04.000 --> 48:05.000] Okay. [48:05.000 --> 48:11.000] So the one that I had in Rockwall then, I can just go slam this other new motion in on them, [48:11.000 --> 48:13.000] and then they have to hear that before the trial? [48:13.000 --> 48:14.000] Absolutely. [48:14.000 --> 48:20.000] Because it's a jurisdictional challenge based upon new information. [48:20.000 --> 48:22.000] Nice. [48:22.000 --> 48:31.000] And if they proceed to trial, then they have messed up. [48:31.000 --> 48:38.000] So will they automatically then just hold the motions hearing or probably just reset or something because of that or something? [48:38.000 --> 48:46.000] I guarantee you, once they see it, the prosecutor is going to ask for a reset. [48:46.000 --> 48:49.000] He's going to try to see if there's countermanding information. [48:49.000 --> 48:50.000] And there isn't. [48:50.000 --> 48:54.000] I've already checked. [48:54.000 --> 48:56.000] Wow. [48:56.000 --> 49:04.000] Well, then I'll definitely be in touch with you if not down there on Sunday. [49:04.000 --> 49:09.000] I recommend everybody go on Sunday, be there or be square because it is- [49:09.000 --> 49:12.000] No, be there or be taken advantage of monetarily. [49:12.000 --> 49:14.000] That's what you do. [49:14.000 --> 49:16.000] Well, I was being nice, but yeah. [49:16.000 --> 49:17.000] Well, stop being nice. [49:17.000 --> 49:19.000] That's not getting anybody free of this system. [49:19.000 --> 49:21.000] It's time to be mad. [49:21.000 --> 49:23.000] I'm mad as hell. [49:23.000 --> 49:24.000] So trust me. [49:24.000 --> 49:29.000] And I'm actually the North Texas commander of the U.S. Freedom Army, which is nationwide. [49:29.000 --> 49:31.000] I recommend everybody join that too. [49:31.000 --> 49:33.000] And I'm going to tell everybody. [49:33.000 --> 49:35.000] There's 500 people in the unit. [49:35.000 --> 49:39.000] So yeah, everybody's going to know about you and all this and everything else. [49:39.000 --> 49:42.000] So I'm telling everybody all the time. [49:42.000 --> 49:43.000] Trust me. [49:43.000 --> 49:45.000] You're the man. [49:45.000 --> 49:49.000] So- Well, I'm A man. I don't know if I'm B man. [49:49.000 --> 49:55.000] Well, what you're doing, yeah, you need to start putting your stuff up on YouTube. [49:55.000 --> 49:56.000] I'm serious. [49:56.000 --> 49:58.000] I mean, because you will just catch on fire. [49:58.000 --> 50:01.000] Last week you were on fire, my man. [50:01.000 --> 50:03.000] It was great. [50:03.000 --> 50:06.000] Well, appreciate that. [50:06.000 --> 50:10.000] So other than that, then I'm going to- I got your number. [50:10.000 --> 50:13.000] I hope to be down there Sunday though. [50:13.000 --> 50:14.000] I really want to be there in person. [50:14.000 --> 50:15.000] I like coming down. [50:15.000 --> 50:18.000] So other than that, I'll let you get to everybody else, [50:18.000 --> 50:21.000] because I'm pretty confident about what's going on here. [50:21.000 --> 50:24.000] And I can't wait to see this new motion. [50:24.000 --> 50:25.000] All right. [50:25.000 --> 50:27.000] Thanks for calling in, Scott. [50:27.000 --> 50:28.000] Yes, sir. [50:27.000 --> 50:28.000] Have a good evening. [50:28.000 --> 50:29.000] You too. [50:29.000 --> 50:30.000] Okay, bye. [50:30.000 --> 50:31.000] Bye-bye. [50:31.000 --> 50:32.000] All right. [50:32.000 --> 50:35.000] Post call in number 512-646-1984. [50:35.000 --> 50:37.000] We got Lee in California. [50:37.000 --> 50:39.000] Lee, what you got? [50:39.000 --> 50:41.000] Hey, how are you, Eddie? [50:41.000 --> 50:42.000] I'm good. [50:41.000 --> 50:43.000] And you? [50:43.000 --> 50:44.000] Okay, good, good. [50:44.000 --> 50:48.000] Yeah, I called in several times in regards to my daughter [50:48.000 --> 50:52.000] and the legal search in school. [50:52.000 --> 50:56.000] And I filed a complaint with the district attorney, [50:56.000 --> 50:58.000] and I received a letter back from them. [50:58.000 --> 51:01.000] And with a little short paragraph, [51:01.000 --> 51:06.000] it said, basically, absence further information [51:06.000 --> 51:09.000] tending to prove that a crime occurred [51:09.000 --> 51:12.000] this office must consider this matter closed. [51:12.000 --> 51:14.000] Basically, they're telling me... [51:14.000 --> 51:17.000] Well, they're saying that a violation of her rights [51:17.000 --> 51:19.000] in that fashion is not a criminal act [51:19.000 --> 51:21.000] under any law that they've got. [51:21.000 --> 51:26.000] That's true, but it is a criminal violation under Title 18, [51:26.000 --> 51:33.000] which gives you grounds to sue under Title 42. [51:33.000 --> 51:34.000] Okay. [51:34.000 --> 51:41.000] Now, I want to file a complaint against the VA [51:41.000 --> 51:43.000] with the grand jury. [51:43.000 --> 51:47.000] But on the letter, it's stating the DA's name, [51:47.000 --> 51:50.000] but it's signed by the head deputy. [51:50.000 --> 51:52.000] Okay, doesn't matter. [51:52.000 --> 51:55.000] Go after his boss. [51:55.000 --> 51:57.000] Okay, the DA is... [51:57.000 --> 52:03.000] The DA is responsible for anything his deputy does. [52:03.000 --> 52:05.000] Okay. [52:05.000 --> 52:08.000] And how would I get to the grand jury? [52:08.000 --> 52:10.000] I mean, is there a special place for them or...? [52:10.000 --> 52:13.000] Well, you're in California, right? [52:13.000 --> 52:14.000] Yeah. [52:14.000 --> 52:16.000] Well, then you need to find out where the grand jury [52:16.000 --> 52:19.000] in your area convenes and go there. [52:19.000 --> 52:22.000] All right, and so basically, [52:22.000 --> 52:24.000] I have nothing to do with the DA anymore. [52:24.000 --> 52:28.000] Everything from now on is to the grand jury, correct? [52:28.000 --> 52:31.000] As far as criminal complaints, yeah. [52:31.000 --> 52:33.000] But again, if there... [52:33.000 --> 52:39.000] What state crime are you alleging is the result [52:39.000 --> 52:46.000] that would give a grand jury grounds to find and indict? [52:46.000 --> 52:47.000] Okay. [52:47.000 --> 52:52.000] What is the state crime that you're saying they committed? [52:52.000 --> 52:54.000] Illegal searches? [52:54.000 --> 52:55.000] No. [52:55.000 --> 53:00.000] Where in California is there a law that says [53:00.000 --> 53:03.000] any public servant that perpetrates an illegal search [53:03.000 --> 53:10.000] has committed the crime of or is guilty of an offense of? [53:10.000 --> 53:12.000] You see? [53:12.000 --> 53:13.000] Okay. [53:13.000 --> 53:15.000] Yeah, it's a criminal violation of rights, [53:15.000 --> 53:18.000] but not necessarily at the state level [53:18.000 --> 53:21.000] as far as them pressing criminal charges, [53:21.000 --> 53:25.000] but it gives you grounds to civilly sue. [53:25.000 --> 53:29.000] Now, like I said, Title 18 of the federal code [53:29.000 --> 53:33.000] is criminal in those types of cases, [53:33.000 --> 53:37.000] and that criminal violation there gives you grounds to sue [53:37.000 --> 53:42.000] under Title 42 or any violation of the parameters of Title 42 [53:42.000 --> 53:47.000] gives you grounds to sue under Title 42. [53:47.000 --> 53:49.000] Okay. [53:49.000 --> 53:53.000] And I wouldn't have to state that on the complaint [53:53.000 --> 53:55.000] to the grand jury about the DA, right? [53:55.000 --> 53:57.000] If you take it to a grand jury, [53:57.000 --> 54:00.000] you have to be able to say what state law was broken, [54:00.000 --> 54:06.000] because that's the only thing they can hear. [54:06.000 --> 54:08.000] Okay. [54:08.000 --> 54:11.000] And that would be under, I guess, the penal code, [54:11.000 --> 54:15.000] I'm assuming, right, or not educational code? [54:15.000 --> 54:22.000] Does the educational code define an illegal search as a crime? [54:22.000 --> 54:27.000] No, but I guess it states that it can go, [54:27.000 --> 54:31.000] if it violates any other, I guess, higher law. [54:31.000 --> 54:33.000] Okay. [54:33.000 --> 54:38.000] But again, you aren't pointing me to any other law. [54:38.000 --> 54:40.000] You see the problem? [54:40.000 --> 54:42.000] You want this to be a crime, [54:42.000 --> 54:48.000] so where did the legislature in California define it as a crime? [54:48.000 --> 54:51.000] I'm assuming an abuse of official capacity. [54:51.000 --> 54:53.000] That's possible. [54:53.000 --> 54:58.000] What are the parameters of abuse of official capacity in California? [54:58.000 --> 55:05.000] I know what it is here. [55:05.000 --> 55:10.000] Does the language of that offense say deny anyone [55:10.000 --> 55:15.000] and any right, benefit, or privilege? [55:15.000 --> 55:17.000] You can't deny it, yeah. [55:17.000 --> 55:18.000] No, no, no. [55:18.000 --> 55:22.000] Is that the language of the statute, [55:22.000 --> 55:25.000] that the person commits an offense by depriving another person [55:25.000 --> 55:30.000] of any right, benefit, or privilege in violation of any law [55:30.000 --> 55:35.000] or any constitutionally protected right? [55:35.000 --> 55:38.000] Yes, that's on the penal code, [55:38.000 --> 55:42.000] and it's also on the California Constitution. [55:42.000 --> 55:43.000] No, okay. [55:43.000 --> 55:46.000] I think we're still not clicking here. [55:46.000 --> 55:51.000] Abuse of official capacity is a crime in Texas. [55:51.000 --> 55:53.000] I'm assuming, based upon your statement, [55:53.000 --> 55:57.000] that you have seen that it is a crime in California. [55:57.000 --> 56:03.000] Now what I'm asking you is, what are the parameters of that crime? [56:03.000 --> 56:13.000] What is the language in that statute of how the crime is committed? [56:13.000 --> 56:17.000] Because that is the elements that they must be in violation of [56:17.000 --> 56:22.000] in order to constitute the offense, right? [56:22.000 --> 56:23.000] Okay, that's correct. [56:23.000 --> 56:26.000] So what does it say? [56:26.000 --> 56:31.000] If it's in front of you, read it to me. [56:31.000 --> 56:37.000] The paper that she got handed or the one that the VA sent me? [56:37.000 --> 56:40.000] I want to know what the statute says. [56:40.000 --> 56:42.000] I don't care what they told you. [56:42.000 --> 56:45.000] What does the statute say? [56:45.000 --> 56:46.000] I'm sorry. [56:46.000 --> 56:53.000] I have so many paperwork that I'm doing, I'm sorry. [56:53.000 --> 57:00.000] I don't have it right in front of me, I'm sorry. [57:00.000 --> 57:01.000] I don't have it in front of me, [57:01.000 --> 57:05.000] but that's what I've got to look for then, right? [57:05.000 --> 57:09.000] Yes, well, you need to look at the specific offense in the penal code [57:09.000 --> 57:13.000] in California for abuse of official capacity or official oppression, [57:13.000 --> 57:20.000] possibly both, if they're both there. [57:20.000 --> 57:24.000] And would kidnapping be part of one of those? [57:24.000 --> 57:28.000] Because they took them to a different room away from where they were at [57:28.000 --> 57:29.000] to have them checked. [57:29.000 --> 57:35.000] You would have to look at what the parameters for kidnapping are. [57:35.000 --> 57:36.000] I see, okay. [57:36.000 --> 57:40.000] So basically, can we get all the elements of... [57:40.000 --> 57:44.000] Read the statute and see if the elements of the statute [57:44.000 --> 57:50.000] are met by the actions of the person that you are saying committed the offense. [57:50.000 --> 57:52.000] And they can't be almost. [57:52.000 --> 57:55.000] It has to be everything that's stipulated, [57:55.000 --> 58:00.000] unless the elements are separated by the word or. [58:00.000 --> 58:05.000] If it's this or this, then they've committed the offense. [58:05.000 --> 58:07.000] If it's this and this, [58:07.000 --> 58:11.000] they have to do both of those things to commit the offense. [58:11.000 --> 58:14.000] If it's separated by a semicolon, [58:14.000 --> 58:17.000] it depends upon how it's been interpreted. [58:17.000 --> 58:20.000] Does the semicolon mean this one or this one, [58:20.000 --> 58:22.000] or does it mean this one and this one? [58:22.000 --> 58:25.000] You've got to figure that out too, okay? [58:25.000 --> 58:26.000] Got it, got it. [58:26.000 --> 58:28.000] Okay, I'm understanding it now. [58:28.000 --> 58:29.000] All right. [58:29.000 --> 58:30.000] Very good. [58:30.000 --> 58:32.000] All right, so read up on that, [58:32.000 --> 58:34.000] and hopefully by the time we get back from break in four minutes, [58:34.000 --> 58:36.000] you can tell me what it says. [58:36.000 --> 58:37.000] Okay. [58:37.000 --> 58:38.000] All right, hang on. [58:38.000 --> 58:40.000] All right, folks, we'll be right back. [58:40.000 --> 58:42.000] Y'all, here you are. [58:50.000 --> 58:54.000] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, [58:54.000 --> 58:58.000] yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.000 --> 59:02.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, [59:02.000 --> 59:07.000] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. [59:07.000 --> 59:09.000] Enter the recovery version. [59:09.000 --> 59:13.000] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [59:13.000 --> 59:18.000] but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.000 --> 59:22.000] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [59:22.000 --> 59:25.000] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word [59:25.000 --> 59:28.000] beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.000 --> 59:33.000] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.000 --> 59:39.000] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free [59:39.000 --> 59:44.000] at 1-888-551-0102 [59:44.000 --> 59:48.000] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:48.000 --> 59:51.000] That's freestudybible.com. [59:51.000 --> 59:54.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, [59:54.000 --> 59:59.000] logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:24.000 --> 01:00:30.000] 14th of October, 2013, opened up with gold at $1,183.91 an ounce, [01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:32.000] silver, $16.14 an ounce, [01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:35.000] Texas crude, $46.66 a barrel, [01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:45.000] and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 254 U.S. currency. [01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:49.000] Today in history, Thursday, October 14th, 1773, [01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:54.000] the Peggy Stewart, a cargo vessel, was burned in Annapolis as punishment [01:00:54.000 --> 01:00:57.000] for violating the boycott on British tea imports. [01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:01.000] These tea restrictions had been imposed in retaliation to the British military's treatment [01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:04.000] of the people of Boston following the Boston Tea Party. [01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:11.000] This act became known as the Annapolis Tea Party. [01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:15.000] In recent news, the Danish Safety Board released the findings of their investigation [01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:21.000] into the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17, which crashed in the Ukraine July 17, 2014. [01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:24.000] The safety board determined that a Buck surface-to-air missile [01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:28.000] was used to take down the airline, which killed 298 passengers on board. [01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:32.000] Manufactured by a Russian state-controlled weapons firm Almaz-Antey, [01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:35.000] the Buck warhead was launched from a mobile missile system [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:39.000] requiring specialized training of radar and missile locking systems. [01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:41.000] The Danish Safety Board isn't pointing any fingers, [01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:45.000] and both Ukrainian and Russian officials have been accusing the other of culpability. [01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:49.000] Investigators were able to use info obtained from the blast radius, [01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:53.000] missile fragments, and explosive compound swallowed from the wreckage [01:01:53.000 --> 01:02:02.000] to identify the 9N314M, or Buck missile, as the culprit. [01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:07.000] Texan by Nature, a movement in citizen conservation headed up by former First Lady Laura Bush, [01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:11.000] is reaching out to all Texas private landowners to inform them on techniques [01:02:11.000 --> 01:02:13.000] they can implement to conserve their own property. [01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:15.000] The group recently hosted a monarch butterfly event [01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:19.000] at the George W. Bush Presidential Center on the SMU campus. [01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:23.000] They have kick-started initiatives out of all the different partners across the state [01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:27.000] to encourage people to use native plants and to conserve our land. [01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:30.000] The group is also encouraging the fracking industry to save the ground dirt [01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:33.000] that gets displaced in the process of oil extraction [01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:43.000] through a project in the Eagle Ford Shale area. [01:02:43.000 --> 01:02:46.000] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. [01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:49.000] If you have a product or a service that you'd like to advertise with us, [01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:53.000] feel free to give us a call at 210-363-2257. [01:02:53.000 --> 01:03:03.000] This has been your Lowdown for October 14, 2015. [01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:45.000] Alright folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984. [01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:48.000] Right now we are talking to Lee in California, [01:03:48.000 --> 01:03:51.000] and I'm going to need some more callers up on the board here. [01:03:51.000 --> 01:03:54.000] I've only got a few people, and I'm going to need some more before the end of this, [01:03:54.000 --> 01:03:59.000] because I've got an hour to go, so y'all hang in there and call in and talk to us. [01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:02.000] Alright, Lee, did you get it? [01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:09.000] Well, what I came across so far is just the stuff that they will be punished for [01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:16.000] pretending to be public officers or using color of law under any process [01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:18.000] other than legal authority. [01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:20.000] Is that what I will be looking for? [01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:21.000] Something like that. [01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:22.000] I don't know. [01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:24.000] I can't see what you're reading. [01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:26.000] Okay, it says, it's a penal code. [01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:30.000] It says every public officer or person pretending to be a public officer [01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:35.000] who under the pretense of the color of any process or other... [01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:38.000] Okay, so that's impersonating. [01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:40.000] Okay. [01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:43.000] If false, represent. [01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:47.000] Every person who is intended lead. [01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:52.000] Every person who designates, okay, every person who sells or gives membership, [01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:55.000] okay, every person who maliciously and with intent to assert justice [01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:59.000] or do administration of this law, I think this is it right here, [01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:06.000] or with intent or intent to inflict imminent physical harm in their relation [01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:14.000] or the due administration of the laws, publishes, disseminates, [01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:18.000] or otherwise disclosed their residence address. [01:05:18.000 --> 01:05:20.000] No, this is not it either. [01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:23.000] It's been kind of tough for me to find that one. [01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:25.000] That's what I've been holding back. [01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:27.000] And which one is that? [01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:33.000] The abuse of public office. [01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:34.000] Okay. [01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:36.000] Do yourself a favor. [01:05:36.000 --> 01:05:41.000] Look around and see if you have something like abuse of official capacity [01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:44.000] or official oppression. [01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:47.000] Do a search through your penal code and see if you can find anything like that. [01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:52.000] And if you have any questions about it, if you do find it, read it carefully, [01:05:52.000 --> 01:05:55.000] and then give us a call either later tonight or next week, [01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:57.000] depending upon when you find it. [01:05:57.000 --> 01:06:00.000] Yes, that's most definitely appreciated, you know. [01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:01.000] Thank you so much, Aiden. [01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:02.000] You're very welcome. [01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:03.000] And we'll continue that right now. [01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:04.000] All right. [01:06:04.000 --> 01:06:05.000] Thank you. [01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:06.000] Thanks for calling in, Lee. [01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:07.000] Bye-bye. [01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:08.000] Bye-bye. [01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:09.000] Bye-bye. [01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:14.000] Let's see, well, the rest of these are showing up without names on them, [01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:19.000] so I'm just going to have to start at this one. [01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:22.000] Hello in California, 832 Area Code. [01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:26.000] Who am I talking to? [01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:29.000] Hello, hello? [01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:30.000] Hello? [01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:32.000] Hello, that would be you. [01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:34.000] Hey, Eddie, this is Jerry. [01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:37.000] Hey, Jerry, what can I do for you? [01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:47.000] I'm actually waiting on my trial that I've been dealing with in Winston, Texas. [01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:48.000] Okay. [01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:54.000] I got a speeding ticket down there, and I got pulled over by a sheriff. [01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:57.000] You got a speeding ticket? [01:06:57.000 --> 01:06:58.000] Yes. [01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:00.000] Okay, because you got some background noise there, [01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:05.000] so it's kind of hard to understand you at times. [01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:07.000] Okay. [01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:12.000] And so I went to check or I went to court, [01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:19.000] and I was told by the judge to plead no contest. [01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:23.000] The judge told you to plead no contest? [01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:29.000] Yes, because I was not trying to plead guilty or non-guilty. [01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:34.000] So she said, okay, you're going to plead no contest then. [01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:41.000] A plea of no contest is a plea of guilty. [01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:42.000] Okay. [01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:46.000] A plea of no contest in essence means this. [01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:53.000] I don't like it, but I agree that I'm guilty, and I agree to pay you. [01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:57.000] That's all a no contest is. [01:07:57.000 --> 01:08:00.000] It's still a plea of guilty. [01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:03.000] Okay. [01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:07.000] Did you? [01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:12.000] No, I said no contest, and the judge just told me, okay, [01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:14.000] I'm going to put you down for no contest. [01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:16.000] You're going to talk to the DA. [01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:19.000] Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. [01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:23.000] I just asked you if you did, and you said no. [01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:28.000] Now you're saying that you did plead no contest. [01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:30.000] I stated no contest. [01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:32.000] No, no. [01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:38.000] If you told her no contest, you pled no contest. [01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:39.000] So let me ask you this question. [01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:43.000] How long have you been listening to this show? [01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:44.000] Probably about three months. [01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:45.000] Three months. [01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:49.000] And in any of that three months, have you ever heard me mention what you never, [01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:54.000] ever do in a criminal case? [01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:56.000] Do not plea anything? [01:08:56.000 --> 01:09:01.000] Exactly. [01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:02.000] Okay. [01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:04.000] Because now you've created a problem. [01:09:04.000 --> 01:09:08.000] You can fix the problem as long as you haven't given them any money. [01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:10.000] Is that true? [01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:12.000] True, I haven't given them any money. [01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:14.000] Don't. [01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:17.000] What you need to do is withdraw your plea. [01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:21.000] Say, Judge, I'm sorry, I misunderstood the consequences associated with the [01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:23.000] plea you tricked me into making. [01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:28.000] I do not wish to enter a plea of any kind in order to waive my rights that [01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:30.000] you're trying to steal from me. [01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:34.000] Plus, I've got some paperwork to file challenging the jurisdiction of this [01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:37.000] court through the constitutionality of the code that you're attempting to [01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:39.000] charge me with. [01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:44.000] And then guess what? [01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:46.000] You're going to send me 100 bucks and get this motion and you're going to [01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:48.000] make this all go away. [01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:50.000] And then you get to sue the crap out of the cop that stopped you and the [01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:55.000] judge for going where they went. [01:09:55.000 --> 01:09:57.000] That sounds good. [01:09:57.000 --> 01:09:58.000] Okay. [01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:04.000] Then keep that in mind and keep an eye on my Facebook page, my blog page, [01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:07.000] and the show. [01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:10.000] And hopefully this week I'm going to have this motion and all of the [01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:18.000] necessary evidentiary documents for it all ready to go and be filed. [01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:21.000] And I'm charging 100 bucks for it because of all the expense it's taken me to [01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:24.000] get it written and get the copies made. [01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:30.000] So that will be available and when you get it, file it and fight with it. [01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:34.000] But make darn sure you read it thoroughly and you understand what it says. [01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:38.000] It's not written real complicated or really big words that most people go [01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:39.000] through. [01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:41.000] It's very straightforward. [01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:43.000] You are required to do this, this, and this. [01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:45.000] You did not do this, this, this, and this. [01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:48.000] Here's the evidence you didn't do this, this, and this. [01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:53.000] Therefore, you've got nothing to work with here. [01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:56.000] All right. [01:10:56.000 --> 01:10:57.000] Okay. [01:10:57.000 --> 01:10:58.000] So that's really all there is to it. [01:10:58.000 --> 01:10:59.000] Okay. [01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:00.000] So I'll have to keep up. [01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:02.000] I will keep up with you on Facebook to see when you're going to be able to [01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:04.000] release that and I'll get in contact with you afterwards. [01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:06.000] Okay. [01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:07.000] All right. [01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:09.000] Well, anything else? [01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:10.000] No, that's it for today. [01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:11.000] All right. [01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:13.000] Well, thanks for calling in. [01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:14.000] Thank you. [01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:15.000] All right. [01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:16.000] Bye. [01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:17.000] All right. [01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:23.000] We've got, let's see, what looks like Bill in Wisconsin. [01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:26.000] Bill, what do you got? [01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:27.000] Hi, Eddie. [01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:34.000] I had a question about this motion that you're working on in Texas. [01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:39.000] Is that something that can be applied to, you know, up here in the north? [01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:41.000] I do not know and here is why. [01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:47.000] This motion is very specific to the requirements of the Texas constitutional provisions on how [01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:52.000] laws are to be created and enacted by the Texas legislature. [01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:58.000] I do not know whether your state constitution has those same requirements, nor do I know [01:11:58.000 --> 01:12:04.000] if the bill under which they charge you guys for these types of offenses was enacted in [01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:09.000] the same manner in violation of those provisions under your state constitution. [01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:17.000] So, this motion is not directly transferable to any state that did not have these same [01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:18.000] parameters. [01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:25.000] This one is Texas only unless you have exactly the same language and exactly the same failure [01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:29.000] to comply with that language via your state legislature. [01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:35.000] So, it would probably require some research on my part to... [01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:36.000] Oh, well, absolutely. [01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:42.000] If you're not in Texas, then yeah. [01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:43.000] Okay. [01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:44.000] Another question. [01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:45.000] I was trying to look up... [01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:53.000] You had recommended looking up the case of Robert Fox concerning the plates and I was [01:12:53.000 --> 01:13:00.000] trying to look that up under case law and do you have any recommendation where to find [01:13:00.000 --> 01:13:01.000] that at? [01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:06.000] I can look and see if I might have it. [01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:08.000] I'm not positive I've got it. [01:13:08.000 --> 01:13:16.000] I know it exists and you could probably find it on PACER easy enough. [01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:18.000] I don't remember who it was against. [01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:24.000] I know it was Fox versus or some State of Texas versus Fox or something like that, but [01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:30.000] it had to do with them trying to charge Robert with having false and fictitious plates on [01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:31.000] his car. [01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:40.000] But under the definition of false and fictitious, it specifically requires that the plate be [01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:47.000] made to give it the appearance of being a valid state plate in order to commit the offense. [01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:51.000] Well, Robert's plate specifically stated it was from the Kingdom of Heaven. [01:13:51.000 --> 01:13:54.000] It had absolutely nothing to do with the State of Texas. [01:13:54.000 --> 01:13:57.000] Didn't even look like it came from the State of Texas. [01:13:57.000 --> 01:14:02.000] And the federal judge says under your statute, how do you even come to the conclusion that [01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:08.000] he attempted to mimic a state plate for this offense to apply? [01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:15.000] I can't find a man guilty of that offense when the place that he's alleging it came [01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:22.000] from doesn't even exist. [01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:27.000] And so that was a case in the Texas appeal? [01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:28.000] No, no, no. [01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:30.000] It was in the federal court. [01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:32.000] Robert got it removed. [01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:36.000] It was a federal decision. [01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:37.000] Okay. [01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:38.000] All right. [01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:39.000] Yeah, I'll keep looking for it. [01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:46.000] I was looking for it today and I couldn't find it because I'm working on a case for [01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:52.000] a friend that I'm helping with as a pro se that got stopped. [01:14:52.000 --> 01:15:01.000] You know that what the Woodbury police in Woodbury, Minnesota, the cowards, what they [01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:09.000] do is they go into the shopping malls and they troll the shopping malls looking for [01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:14.000] women's plates that have expired plates or this and that. [01:15:14.000 --> 01:15:18.000] And then they even go into the stores and arrest them. [01:15:18.000 --> 01:15:19.000] Okay. [01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:22.000] I do have the case and this is it. [01:15:22.000 --> 01:15:23.000] Okay. [01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:36.000] U.S. versus Fox 766F period SUPP federal supplement 569-1991. [01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:48.000] The additional number is the United States District Court number which is CR3-90-0288-H [01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:52.000] as in Howard. [01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:53.000] Okay. [01:15:53.000 --> 01:15:54.000] Okay. [01:15:54.000 --> 01:15:55.000] Thank you for that. [01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:58.000] Let's see if I can get that off. [01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:07.000] I've been going down to a county courthouse, a certain court library and trying to find [01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:08.000] it. [01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:12.000] They have a link into West Lawn, I think, or something. [01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:15.000] Now, did you hear my last statement? [01:16:15.000 --> 01:16:23.000] I mean, isn't that cowardness when they're trolling the shopping mall parking lots for [01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:29.000] women's expired plates or this and that and then they chase them down in the store and [01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:31.000] arrest them? [01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:38.000] Well, the problem is that the statute says that they have to be operating it on a highway. [01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:43.000] Do they define highway as to include any place accessible to the public? [01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:46.000] In which case, what does operating mean? [01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:51.000] If she wasn't in the car with it moving, they can't presume that she was the person in it [01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000] when it got there. [01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:55.000] But hang on just a second, Bill. [01:16:55.000 --> 01:16:57.000] We'll take this up on the other side of this break. [01:16:57.000 --> 01:16:58.000] All right, folks. [01:16:58.000 --> 01:16:59.000] Y'all hang on. [01:16:59.000 --> 01:17:01.000] We'll be right back. [01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:05.000] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination [01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:09.000] by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. [01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.000] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality [01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:15.000] coins and precious metals. [01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:19.000] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. [01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:23.000] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers [01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:24.000] and journalists. [01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. [01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:31.000] In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and [01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:32.000] Polynburst. [01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:37.000] We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition [01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:39.000] at 10% above wholesale, and more. [01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000] We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment. [01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:46.000] Call us at 512-646-6440. [01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:51.000] We're located at 7304 Burnet Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. [01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:55.000] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. [01:17:55.000 --> 01:18:01.000] Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440. [01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:06.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:07.000] of nutrition. [01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:12.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:18:12.000 --> 01:18:18.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:24.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can [01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:26.000] provide the nutrients you need. [01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:31.000] Logos Serial Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which [01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:32.000] we reject. [01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:37.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:40.000] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:46.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:48.000] quality radio. [01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:52.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:57.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:59.000] increase your income. [01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000] Order now. [01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000] This is the Logos, the Logos Radio Network. [01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:51.000] Thank you. [01:19:51.000 --> 01:20:02.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:10.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984, and we're talking to Bill in [01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:11.000] Wisconsin. [01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:13.000] All right, Bill, please continue. [01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:15.000] Okay, thank you. [01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:17.000] Yeah, I enjoyed that song. [01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:21.000] Did you pick your own songs out, the books and that? [01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:26.000] Well, the songs that are playing on the show are all Jerry and Debra from their bands. [01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:32.000] The opening song is mine, and I am working on getting some various bumper music of my [01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:34.000] own for the show. [01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:38.000] I just haven't got it in a format where Debra can set it up yet, so I've been working on [01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:41.000] that as I've been able. [01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:42.000] Okay, what a good song. [01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:45.000] They go along good with the format. [01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:51.000] Yeah, so I was just, I'm kind of upset because I found out that the police in Woodbury, [01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:58.000] Minnesota, they're cruising the parking lot because there's some very nice stores for [01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:02.000] shopping, and so they're finding expired plates. [01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:10.000] They're finding any private plates, and then they're watching the people go into the store [01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:15.000] and either arresting them in the store, and they're doing this on the weekend like on [01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:17.000] a Saturday or Sunday. [01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:20.000] Well, that's when most people will be there, yeah. [01:21:20.000 --> 01:21:22.000] Okay, well, let me ask this question. [01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:26.000] Let me ask you a question while we're on this point of it. [01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:33.000] What type of, what is the nature of such an allegation in Wisconsin? [01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:37.000] Is it a crime or is it an infraction? [01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:42.000] Okay, this particular Woodbury is actually in Minnesota, because I live right. [01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:47.000] Okay, in Minnesota, is it a crime or an infraction? [01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:50.000] Well, they're charging it as a crime. [01:21:50.000 --> 01:21:51.000] That's not what I asked you. [01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:53.000] I don't care what they're charging it as. [01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:56.000] What does the statute say it is? [01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:03.000] The statute, the Minnesota statute, I would assume, yeah, I apologize. [01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:05.000] I have to study the statutes. [01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:16.000] You always, always start with the statute where the accusation is being made, always. [01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:20.000] Okay, now let's look at why we need to know this. [01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:28.000] If it's a crime, then we need to find out whether or not it's a specialty statute that [01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:33.000] will allow them to arrest without a warrant in the case of that alleged crime. [01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:39.000] As an infraction, are infractions considered criminal in Minnesota or are they considered civil? [01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:45.000] Because they cannot arrest somebody for a civil infraction. [01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:52.000] There is no probable cause in a civil anything to perform a warrantless arrest. [01:22:52.000 --> 01:23:01.000] There is no probable cause to base upon an application for a warrant of arrest in a civil offense either. [01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:08.000] So any arrest relevant to a civil infraction is in itself criminal. [01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:12.000] Now if it is defined as a crime, then what level of crime is it? [01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:19.000] And if it's a level that does not authorize a warrantless arrest, that also becomes an issue. [01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:23.000] That's why you need to know what the statute says. [01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:31.000] Okay, I had a question about your course that I was thinking of taking. [01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:39.000] That course, it says on the site, it was one you did in the year 2008? [01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:41.000] 2009. [01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:46.000] 2009, and then it comes with the video? [01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:49.000] I couldn't tell if the video is on there, the audio? [01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:56.000] The downloaded version contains the audio and all of the documents, the research and all that. [01:23:56.000 --> 01:24:01.000] The video is too big to be downloaded in that fashion. [01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:15.000] The video, even the encoded video is like 200 gigs because it's two and a half days' worth of video. [01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:24.000] Okay, and then there's a pretty good amount of documents that you... [01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:34.000] Over 400 legal pleadings and tens of thousands of research documents, statutes, case law, you name it. [01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:35.000] There's more. [01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:41.000] In what you download, there's more than 64 gigs of material. [01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:47.000] Okay, and out of that 64 gigs, only a couple of hundred megabytes is the audio of the seminar. [01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:52.000] Everything else is documentation of some kind. [01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:54.000] That's a big download. [01:24:54.000 --> 01:24:55.000] Wow. [01:24:55.000 --> 01:24:57.000] Okay. [01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:01.000] I mean, it's made so you can download just part of it. [01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:10.000] Yeah, but each of the sections, even though there's multiple files for that section of about 100 or so megabytes each, [01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:15.000] you cannot extract them without all of the ones for that piece. [01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:21.000] For instance, you've got your research files, which is everything that's in the organized research folder. [01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:29.000] There may be 40 files for the research folder or 10 files or whatever because they're in 100 megabyte sizes, [01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:36.000] and it's almost eight gigs in the research folder, so it's like 7.8 gigs. [01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:41.000] So divide that by 100. That would be the number of files that you've got to download for that section, [01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:50.000] but you cannot extract them until you get all of them because they were compressed in a series. [01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:54.000] So like all the research files have to be extracted together? [01:25:54.000 --> 01:25:58.000] Correct. You have to download all of the research files to extract the research folder. [01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:06.000] You have to download all of the reference folder in order to extract anything in it, [01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:13.000] but that's because there's just way too much for me to break up into little pieces and then compress that individually. [01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:20.000] I would have to do that every single time I did an update to anything, and I don't have the time to do that. [01:26:20.000 --> 01:26:26.000] Okay. So is there any way to like, once you download it, is it? [01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:30.000] The book is in its own download, and that's under 25 megabytes. [01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:40.000] The pleadings are in their own download, and that is less than – it's way less than 100 megabytes if it's only a few megabytes by itself. [01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:46.000] So you can get the book and all the legal pleadings very quickly, very easily, [01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:52.000] but the rest of it as far as the resource material, the legal dictionaries that we've got scanned copies of [01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:59.000] that are no longer in copyright, and the case law and all that stuff that's up there, [01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:06.000] that's in the bigger files and in bigger folders, so you're going to have to take that in blocks. [01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:12.000] And then you take the – do you have like in any of the audio or the – [01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:20.000] The audio is also in its own compilation, and like I say, it's like 200 megabytes, and it's already in MP3 files. [01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:26.000] So it's broken up into like one or two download files, maybe three. [01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:32.000] And then you have some – do you get into courtroom procedures? [01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:39.000] Not in that seminar, no. Everything in that seminar was about how to read and understand and research statute [01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:44.000] and how to use the legal pleadings to fight your cases. [01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:52.000] And what does have to be researched is you have to take what's in that book and you have to find the concurrent statute [01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:59.000] in your state and how it reads. They're usually very, very close. [01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:08.000] Okay? And then you just couch the legal arguments in the pleadings to match up with the statute as it appears in your state. [01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:12.000] Okay. And do you do any coaching or training? [01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:15.000] I do, but that's separate and apart from the cost of the seminar. [01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:21.000] I charge for that time and how much depends upon what we're dealing with. [01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:25.000] Well, yeah, I understand that you would charge. I just wondered if you do that. [01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:26.000] Yeah, I do. [01:28:26.000 --> 01:28:33.000] So if I wanted to get some coaching on the actual courtroom, you have that service available. [01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:34.000] Yes. [01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:35.000] In contact with you. [01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:36.000] Yes. [01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:37.000] Okay. That's wonderful. [01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:42.000] Well, I'm enjoying it. I'm learning a lot from your program and I thank you for it. [01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:47.000] Well, I appreciate that. Thank you very much. [01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:48.000] Anything else? [01:28:48.000 --> 01:29:10.000] No. Yeah, I was just wondering, do you think that some of the sheriffs and the police, do you think that they realize that the way they're treating the public, [01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:15.000] do you think that they think they're doing the right thing? [01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:18.000] I think that some of them don't care. [01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:24.000] They see themselves as the authority and what you think about that authority is absolutely irrelevant to them. [01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:37.000] Now, there are some that aren't that way, but unfortunately they are in the vast minority and they're not going to be able to change those without arresting them themselves. [01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:41.000] And the question is, would they? [01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:48.000] So to answer your question, I don't think it matters to most of them whether they know or not. [01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:54.000] They're going to do what they're told or do what they want because they believe they are the power. [01:29:54.000 --> 01:30:03.000] All right. I got another break, Bill. I thank you for calling in. I'm going to pick up another caller when I get back. [01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:13.000] We're only 24 hours in a day and you try to spend them wisely, yet every hour you spend doing this activity increases your risk of a heart attack by up to 8%. [01:30:13.000 --> 01:30:17.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back to tell you what it is. [01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:22.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:27.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:33.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:43.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:46.000] Start over with Startpage. [01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:51.000] You already know that staring flat-jawed at the boob tube makes you feel like a slug, [01:30:51.000 --> 01:30:56.000] but it turns out TV may be doing the same thing to your heart that it does to your mind. [01:30:56.000 --> 01:31:02.000] Researchers in England examined the television viewing habits of over 12,000 middle-aged and elderly people. [01:31:02.000 --> 01:31:06.000] They found the more TV they watched, the higher their risk of heart disease. [01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:15.000] In fact, for each additional hour of TV time, their risk of heart problems increased 6 to 8%, regardless of how much they exercised. [01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:21.000] Americans watch an average of five hours of TV a day. Maybe it's time for a change of heart. [01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:36.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:43.000] The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000] And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:54.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction office. I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:58.000] I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:06.000] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:11.000] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their Kim Trails, but good luck getting them to pay for it. [01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:15.000] Okay, I might be kidding about the Kim Trails, but I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:21.000] We have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:27.000] And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. [01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:32.000] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:45.000] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:56.000 --> 01:33:01.000] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. May not actually be kidding about Kim Trails. [01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:11.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradio.com. [01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:47.000] Hi, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:52.000] All right. I've got Tina in Florida. Tina, what do you have? [01:33:52.000 --> 01:34:01.000] Hi. I just pretty much got a statement and, you know, just a request. [01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:14.000] You know, as far as my law office situation, my case is a child custody case where I have a special needs child that was taken away from me from six years of her life. [01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:28.000] You know, I haven't been rendered as an unfit, you know, mother. And you have so many parents that are in the same situation as I am, mothers or fathers that are good parents. [01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:36.000] And with the family court, there's a lot of, you know, corruption that is actually going on. [01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:43.000] Absolutely. Like I said, family court is the most corrupt area of the judicial system in existence. [01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:49.000] Yes. Yes. And it is. And I, you know, I just got in a situation. [01:34:49.000 --> 01:35:00.000] I got so unlucky because my child was taken away and given to her father. I took care of her all her life. [01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:12.000] And he has been in court. He's dismissed more than one case. And you know that once you dismiss the same case, it's, you know, you can't come back in the court. [01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:22.000] The judges are aware that he has dismissed one case. It's, you know, the cases are on the court dock. It's the same case. [01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:27.000] He's dismissed one. And when he dismissed his first case, he came back in. [01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:32.000] And what I'm talking about here, I'm talking about the father 63 days later and opened up another case. [01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:44.000] When my child was taken, I put in the request for emergency hearing to have my child returned because she was moved out of her jurisdiction. [01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:53.000] We stayed in two different cities because the judge used to work as the state attorney here. [01:35:53.000 --> 01:36:00.000] The judges where I reside wouldn't do anything. They wouldn't give me a hearing or anything. [01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:10.000] When they took my child, I didn't know where she went. I didn't know anything. It took all my rights away. [01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:21.000] And you have judges. You have lawyers. You have the court. They know about my case, but nobody won't do anything about it. [01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:37.000] She needs medical assistance. She's on the autism spectrum. I try to, you know, request where she can get the help that she needs because I was doing it all. [01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:49.000] And it's sad because, you know, when I try to bring people to individual's attention, no one will not do anything about it. [01:36:49.000 --> 01:37:01.000] And, you know, I thank God that I have God and my family and my friends that are behind me because this has been going on for eight years. [01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:08.000] And my daughter wants to come home, you know, and I finally got back in court after a year. [01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:15.000] And the only thing that they would give me is just I only have just alternating weekends with my child. [01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:27.000] And you know that when you are the noncoastal parent, you know, when summertime comes or, you know, Christmas or what have you, you're supposed to get your child, you know. [01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:42.000] And, you know, I can't even get that. And, you know, it's just a shame that, you know, I've spent thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands and I won't stop fighting for my child. [01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:48.000] And you have these judges and they're doing this and they're tearing the homes up. [01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:53.000] They're tearing the homes up, you know, and there's parents out there, good fathers out there. [01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:56.000] It's not just good mothers, but there are good fathers out there. [01:37:56.000 --> 01:38:04.000] There are grandparents or caregivers out there taking care of their, you know, kids when their own parents, you know, when the parents won't do it. [01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:15.000] And you have the court breaking the family up and we're paying thousands of thousands of dollars and nothing is still not doing anything about it. [01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:17.000] Well, I would agree with you. [01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:27.000] Because the way, and the way the court did me and my daughter and broke us up, you know, she wants to come home, you know. [01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:36.000] She wants to be with me, you know, and the way they're doing myself and her is a disgrace. [01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:43.000] It's a disgrace to her as a human being. It's a disgrace to me as being a responsible mother. [01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:47.000] I took care of her all her life. [01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:55.000] And it's just a total disgrace that nobody won't do anything about it. [01:38:55.000 --> 01:38:58.000] Nobody. [01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:07.000] Well, that's the problem with having a system that is dependent on no one but itself for accountability. [01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:20.000] The family court system has isolated itself from all manner of rights and due process and now operates as its own independent entity with no checks and balances upon what it does. [01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:25.000] It is, in fact, I watched a video on exactly that problem today. [01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:30.000] We have the same problem in every area of law and government. [01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:40.000] Every part of it has become institutionalized and it's institutionalized to ensure the employment of those that work within it. [01:39:40.000 --> 01:39:55.000] In systems like what you're talking about, everybody wants their job security and they get it by ensuring that divisiveness in families and cases keeps them employed. [01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:08.000] It's in their best interest to cause conflict of the most heinous kind in order to keep their ability to function and work and demand more money for doing it at the highest possible level. [01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:11.000] That's the problem. [01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:12.000] Yes, and I agree. [01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:13.000] And it's just breaking up homes. [01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:14.000] And like I said, I'm fighting. [01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:16.000] I'm fighting for my daughter. [01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:20.000] And you have somebody that came into the system and manipulated the system. [01:40:20.000 --> 01:40:21.000] You can't have to. [01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:22.000] You can't. [01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:32.000] The court that when they took my daughter, they don't even have jurisdiction because when they open up the second case, they did what? [01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:33.000] You know what? [01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:35.000] Constructive service. [01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:43.000] You know, and you can't do constructive service and say that you have jurisdiction over an individual. [01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:47.000] The constructive service that they did is not even in my county. [01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:55.000] So how they don't even have jurisdictions and you have a court that pretty much when they came to pick my daughter up, they took her out of my hand. [01:40:55.000 --> 01:40:56.000] I mean, that's total. [01:40:56.000 --> 01:41:01.000] I mean, it's the most disrespectful thing that you can do to responsible parents. [01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:07.000] They don't even have jurisdiction over myself nor my child. [01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:11.000] She never stayed in the county where it happened. [01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:13.000] And they know. [01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:15.000] And it really doesn't make any sense. [01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:21.000] And I've called so many people, you know, representatives, state attorney's office. [01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:27.000] They know what they did because what he has done, I don't think that. [01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:31.000] And I looked at, you know, I researched this. [01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:35.000] He is not even on my child's birth certificate. [01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:37.000] He's on her birth certificate as a John Doe. [01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:40.000] He terminated his rights long ago. [01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:56.000] And if someone would just look at my papers, which they refused to do, he has did something that I researched that I don't see any other man in this situation has gotten away with what he's gotten away with. [01:41:56.000 --> 01:41:57.000] And they know it. [01:41:57.000 --> 01:42:04.000] They've broken a lot of rules and violated a lot of constitutions, and they've taken away my rights. [01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:06.000] And he doesn't even have any rights. [01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:10.000] If someone would just look at my papers, I know my case. [01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:11.000] Yeah. [01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:14.000] But see, that goes to exactly what I was saying. [01:42:14.000 --> 01:42:21.000] If they looked at your papers and were faced with the truth, the conflict would be resolved and the money would disappear. [01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:26.000] Their whole goal is to make sure that doesn't happen. [01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:30.000] The welfare of the child is irrelevant in these courts and in this system. [01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:32.000] It's absolutely irrelevant. [01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:35.000] The rights of the parent is irrelevant. [01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:37.000] It is the money. [01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:38.000] It is the control. [01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:54.000] It is the ability to seek federal funding by keeping this child and you as the parents engaged in the system for as long as possible so that their funding is fulfilled. [01:42:54.000 --> 01:42:58.000] Yes. [01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:08.000] You know, I just hope that the college and everybody just keep praying for myself and my daughter. I won't stop fighting. I'm not going to stop fighting her. [01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:09.000] I will fight for her. [01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:18.000] Well, if people want this to stop, they have to get in the face of their legislators in their local precincts, whatever state they're in. [01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:22.000] And you need to be getting in their face, not as an individual, but with- [01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:29.000] Yeah, I have, you know, it's funny that these people, you know, they represent you. [01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:33.000] I've never had to go through a situation like this, you know. [01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:35.000] Well, they tell you they represent you. [01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:42.000] But what I'm getting at, if you'll hang on, Tina, when we get back after this break, I'm going to give you some specific details about what I'm talking about. [01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:45.000] Because you go in there alone, you're nothing. [01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:49.000] And we're going to tell you how to do something different when we get back. [01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:50.000] So hang on. [01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:52.000] All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. [01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:54.000] We'll be right back after this break. [01:43:54.000 --> 01:43:55.000] So y'all hang on. [01:43:55.000 --> 01:44:00.000] It's our last segment. [01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000] You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics? [01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:04.000] Sorry. [01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:07.000] Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve? [01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000] What? [01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:13.000] If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity. [01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:14.000] Hi, my name is Steve Holt. [01:44:14.000 --> 01:44:19.000] And like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age. [01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000] I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television. [01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:29.000] Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity. [01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:30.000] But there is hope. [01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000] The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover. [01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000] And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested. [01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:55.000] So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com. [01:44:55.000 --> 01:45:00.000] Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning. [01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:11.000] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course [01:45:11.000 --> 01:45:15.000] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:15.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:15.000 --> 01:46:26.000] If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one? If you could not reach anybody to love, would your purpose have to die? [01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:52.000] Such a sentiment, a soldier, a warrior, a hustler, scuffle, and that keeps his heat. All it's taking is a misunderstanding. Somebody calls the police. Watchin' the Spongebob. [01:46:52.000 --> 01:47:00.000] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. We are in our last segment here, and we are still talking with Tina in Florida. [01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:06.000] All right, Tina, what I was getting at when I was talking about getting in the face of your legislature, don't go by yourself. [01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:11.000] Find other parents that have suffered as you have suffered in your area. [01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:19.000] Organize groups in every precinct or district or whatever it is in Florida where these legislators have an office. [01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:26.000] Every time they're there, have that group in their face about what's going on in these courts. [01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:37.000] What you guys need to do is to work together to create some legislation for your state that you want this representative to push. [01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:57.000] And that should be that it shall be a crime for any family court judge to initiate the seizure of any child or separation of any child from any parent without full due process of law and the full protection of the rights of all concerned. [01:47:57.000 --> 01:48:11.000] If they make a law to that regard and they forbid these family courts, and most important, no family court shall accept any federal funding for any purpose whatsoever. [01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:16.000] That cuts the purse strings that is the incentive to steal your child. [01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:28.000] The problem is you're not very likely to get the state legislature to put the burden of funding the family court on its own funds if it can get it from the Fed. [01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:35.000] Now understand that these kickback funds from the federal government are absolutely unconstitutional. [01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:44.000] There is no constitutional authority for them to allocate funds as kickbacks to the states to implement federal programs. [01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:51.000] But we have been sold out by our government at every department and level, so they get away with it. [01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:58.000] Most of these programs are absolutely unconstitutional and therefore constitutionally illegal. [01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:00.000] But we are letting them get away with it. [01:49:00.000 --> 01:49:02.000] We are allowing this to happen. [01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:11.000] We are the only ones that can stop it because no fat man is ever going to turn down a cupcake. [01:49:11.000 --> 01:49:16.000] Okay. Thank you so much. [01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:18.000] You're very welcome. [01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:24.000] I hope it works out, but it'll only work out once we start organizing and fighting back. [01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:25.000] Okay. Thank you. [01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:28.000] Okay. Anything else? [01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:29.000] No, that's it. [01:49:29.000 --> 01:49:31.000] Thank you so much for listening to me. [01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:32.000] Yes, ma'am. [01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:33.000] Thank you for calling in. [01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:34.000] Okay. Bye. [01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:35.000] Bye-bye. [01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:36.000] All right. [01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:43.000] That leaves me with one caller, Truth Raider. Raider, what do you have? [01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:44.000] All right, Eddie. [01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:45.000] Thank you. [01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:46.000] Uh-huh. [01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:50.000] I sent you the information on the most recent traffic stop. [01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:51.000] When did you do that? [01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:53.000] First. [01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:59.000] That was probably during the time when you were having internet problems and trying to rebuild your computer. [01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:00.000] Okay. [01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:07.000] So, you did respond and said that your emails are intermittent. [01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:08.000] Okay. [01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:13.000] So, yeah, I got stopped. [01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:17.000] This guy was a sheriff deputy and he was a sergeant. [01:50:17.000 --> 01:50:19.000] So, he was a veteran and he wasn't having it. [01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:28.000] He wasn't having any of the script, you know, the name and badge number and can I help with an emergency or anything. [01:50:28.000 --> 01:50:34.000] He told me he wanted to have an ID immediately and I said name and address and date of birth [01:50:34.000 --> 01:50:39.000] and perhaps social security number is all that I need to provide to you that's sufficient [01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:42.000] and that's upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. [01:50:42.000 --> 01:50:44.000] Nope, I need a physical ID. [01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:51.000] So, I said my name and I gave him the affidavit and he said, okay, step out of the truck, please. [01:50:51.000 --> 01:50:52.000] Okay. [01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:53.000] So, I don't want to get beat up. [01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:54.000] Okay. [01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:02.000] So, I stepped out and I complied under duress and company said you're under arrest for driving while suspended. [01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:05.000] They took me and two other deputies had showed up. [01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:11.000] They told me it was a mandatory transport and they searched my truck, [01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:16.000] put me in the back of one of their other police cars, held me there for 40 minutes [01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:24.000] and then I gave them the warning, I told them this is, you know, just give me the warning that you're kidnapping me. [01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:29.000] They came back and about 35, 40 minutes later, opened the door and said, well, what's your social security number? [01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:35.000] I gave them social security number and they verified that, well, I found this because when they did search me, [01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:43.000] they took my identification out of my pocket, you know, against my will and said all you have to do is provide this. [01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:45.000] We wouldn't have to go through all this. [01:51:45.000 --> 01:51:48.000] Well, the Supreme Court has ruled that name and address and date of birth is required. [01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:49.000] Wait a minute. [01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:53.000] Where are you getting the Supreme Court has ruled this? [01:51:53.000 --> 01:51:59.000] You had mentioned in previous shows that that was sufficient. [01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:00.000] No. [01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:01.000] According to the... [01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:08.000] What I mentioned in previous shows is that the failure to ID statute in Texas says that's all that is required. [01:52:08.000 --> 01:52:13.000] There is no physical production of ID required. [01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:25.000] Most of the states of which I am aware do not have a mandatory ID law as far as you're required to apply for one. [01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:29.000] How can you produce something you've never gotten? [01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:39.000] Therefore, the logical inference is that no law can make a requirement for mandatory production of an ID [01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:49.000] and then criminalize the failure to do so when the application and receiving of same is not mandatory in and of itself. [01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:51.000] That's what I said. [01:52:51.000 --> 01:52:59.000] I never said the United States Supreme Court said that was all that's required. [01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:06.000] I just vaguely remember you saying that it was upheld and that there was no requirement to produce a photo ID. [01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:10.000] And I just wanted to mention something about it was upheld. [01:53:10.000 --> 01:53:17.000] Here in Texas, there are Texas Supreme Court cases on lawsuits that hold that. [01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:26.000] And there's appellate court cases that dismissed charges against individuals because there's no requirement for that. [01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:37.000] But I never said the United States Supreme Court said that because I don't know that every state does that. [01:53:37.000 --> 01:53:38.000] Okay. [01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:39.000] All right. [01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:42.000] That was my bad, my misunderstanding of that. [01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:45.000] But that is true. [01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:48.000] Is it not the name of the drug data person? [01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:49.000] No. [01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:52.000] I don't know if that's true across the nation. [01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:54.000] I know it's true in Texas. [01:53:54.000 --> 01:53:59.000] I don't know that it's what the U.S. Supreme Court has ever said or not. [01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:01.000] Okay. [01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:02.000] All right. [01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:05.000] Well, here's a couple questions before the show runs out. [01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:11.000] When he stopped me, is that anything that's criminal or is that civil when he stopped me? [01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:17.000] Well, it depends entirely on the basis of the stop and whether or not it's a criminal basis. [01:54:17.000 --> 01:54:20.000] They're in Oregon where you're at or wherever it is you're at. [01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:22.000] Yeah, I'm in Oregon. [01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:28.000] And, well, it was because of the suspended license status that comes up on the computer. [01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:29.000] Okay. [01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:31.000] Well, see, here's the thing you need to understand. [01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:41.000] Here in Texas, a suspended license is criminal, but it is not something they can arrest you for without a warrant. [01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:48.000] It is not within the subtitle C, warrantless arrest provisions of the transportation code. [01:54:48.000 --> 01:54:51.000] It's outside of the warrantless arrest. [01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:55.000] In order for them to arrest you for the charge, they have to get a warrant. [01:54:55.000 --> 01:54:58.000] Same thing with failure to provide financial responsibility. [01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:02.000] It's not an arrestable offense absent a warrant. [01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:08.000] So what you need to understand in Oregon is, is the charge in a section of code [01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:13.000] where they are authorized to arrest without a warrant for its violation. [01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:15.000] Okay. [01:55:15.000 --> 01:55:17.000] All right. [01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:22.000] Now, granted here, that's not going to matter anymore with the motion I've currently got. [01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:29.000] It doesn't invalidate everything in the transportation code no matter what it is. [01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:30.000] Okay. [01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:38.000] Now they towed my truck and they towed it from like a gas station mini-mark parking lot. [01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:41.000] I didn't pull out the side of the road because they didn't have any shoulders. [01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:43.000] It was just ditches on both sides of the road. [01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:44.000] Okay. [01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:47.000] Now there's another thing you have to look at. [01:55:47.000 --> 01:55:53.000] Is it a crime or is it an infraction in Oregon for what they charged you with? [01:55:53.000 --> 01:55:55.000] It must be an infraction. [01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:56.000] Okay. [01:55:56.000 --> 01:56:02.000] In the case of an infraction, are infractions civil or criminal in Oregon? [01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:03.000] Civil. [01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:05.000] You're positive. [01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:06.000] Yes. [01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:07.000] Okay. [01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:11.000] Then the arrest by the officer was illegal. [01:56:11.000 --> 01:56:13.000] Okay. [01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:16.000] This is what everybody tends to forget. [01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:22.000] If an infraction is not a crime, there can never be probable cause. [01:56:22.000 --> 01:56:28.000] There can never be reasonable suspicion because no crime exists. [01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:38.000] The only way to acquire an arrest warrant is probable cause that a crime has been committed, right? [01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:39.000] Right. [01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:40.000] Right. [01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:53.000] So in the case of a civil infraction, the only thing they can do is file a civil suit against you by whatever criteria the law in that state requires. [01:56:53.000 --> 01:57:02.000] But they cannot seize you and arrest you for an infraction that is civil. [01:57:02.000 --> 01:57:05.000] That's what I told them. [01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:06.000] Wait, wait, wait, wait. [01:57:06.000 --> 01:57:10.000] Where were you when you told them this? [01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:14.000] I was sitting on the bumper in handcuffs. [01:57:14.000 --> 01:57:19.000] And you read the script, right? [01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:20.000] Yes. [01:57:20.000 --> 01:57:26.000] Where in the script does it tell you to do that? [01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:28.000] I wasn't reading the script when I was sitting there in handcuffs. [01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:40.000] What is my continuously plagiarized Napoleon quote, Raider? [01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:45.000] Well, you mentioned on a stop like that you need to shut up. [01:57:45.000 --> 01:57:46.000] Yeah. [01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:47.000] Well, that's my saying. [01:57:47.000 --> 01:57:54.000] The Napoleon saying is you never interrupt your enemy while he's busy making a mistake. [01:57:54.000 --> 01:58:06.000] In this case, you have a lawsuit, but you could have had a humongous lawsuit by letting them do what they cannot do and suing the crap out of them for it. [01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:07.000] Right. [01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:08.000] All right. [01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:10.000] I'll have to get back to you in more on detail about it. [01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:13.000] They said if you were there, he would be in handcuffs as well. [01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:14.000] Yeah. [01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:17.000] Well, wish him luck with getting out of that one intact. [01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:18.000] All right. [01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:19.000] Thanks for calling in, Raider. [01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:20.000] All right, folks. [01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:22.000] This has been Rule of Law Radio. [01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:24.000] This is your host, Eddie Craig. [01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:25.000] Thank you all for calling in. [01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:26.000] Thank you all for listening. [01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:28.000] We appreciate you so much. [01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:35.000] Please keep us in your donational and financial prayers and blessings by sending us in some money because we can always use it. [01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:42.000] Please contribute donations for the lawsuit and to get this stuff done because this is going to be good when it's over. [01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:43.000] I promise you. [01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:44.000] All right, folks. [01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:45.000] We'll see you next week. [01:58:45.000 --> 01:58:46.000] Good night. [01:58:46.000 --> 01:58:50.000] God bless. [01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:08.000] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:41.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:50.000] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:50.000 --> 01:59:53.000] Looking for some truth? [01:59:53.000 --> 01:59:54.000] You found it. [01:59:54.000 --> 02:00:02.000] Logosradionetwork.com