[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:08.000 --> 00:15.000]  bulletins for the commodities market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop
[00:15.720 --> 00:22.720]  into the tides of the alternative. Markets for the 11th of September, 2015, opened up
[00:22.720 --> 00:29.720]  with gold at $1,110.50 an ounce, silver, $14.69 an ounce, Texas crude, $45.92 a barrel,
[00:35.080 --> 00:42.080]  and bitcoin is currently sitting at about $239 U.S. currency.
[00:44.400 --> 00:49.680]  Today in history, Tuesday, September 11, 2001, the Willow Trade Center complex in downtown
[00:49.680 --> 00:54.760]  Manhattan, New York, is attacked by terrorists. 19 Saudi hijackers managed to crash two commercial
[00:54.760 --> 00:59.000]  airlines into the Willow Trade Center Twin Towers, a third into the Pentagon, and the
[00:59.000 --> 01:04.760]  last fourth hijacked plane was debris scattered over miles near Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
[01:04.760 --> 01:11.760]  In total, 2,996 people lost their lives, including the hijackers. Over 220 senior military intelligence
[01:11.960 --> 01:17.040]  service members, law enforcement, government officials, 1,500 engineers and architects,
[01:17.040 --> 01:23.040]  250 pilots and aviation professionals, 400 professors, 300 survivors and family members,
[01:23.040 --> 01:28.200]  200 artists, entertainers, and media professionals, and over 400 medical professionals have all
[01:28.200 --> 01:35.200]  come out and labeled these attacks as false flags. They are calling for an investigation.
[01:37.000 --> 01:40.920]  In recent news, New York's Governor Andrew Cuomo's administration formally approved a
[01:40.920 --> 01:45.840]  $15 minimum wage for fast food employees yesterday. The state plans to gradually implement the
[01:45.840 --> 01:50.160]  mandate over a three-year period for New York City and a six-year period for the rest of
[01:50.160 --> 01:54.120]  the state. Republicans also held a hearing into the process behind the fast food wage
[01:54.120 --> 01:58.220]  increase, which some restaurant owners have said they may challenge in court. Franchise
[01:58.220 --> 02:02.440]  owners say that the increase singles them out and gives an unfair advantage to mom and
[02:02.440 --> 02:06.440]  pop competitors. They are warning that many franchises may be forced to raise prices
[02:06.440 --> 02:11.640]  or cut positions in order to absorb the higher mandated labor costs. The pay increase is
[02:11.640 --> 02:18.640]  expected to affect some 200,000 employees. White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said
[02:21.360 --> 02:25.680]  in a briefing yesterday that while the administration was continuing to examine responses to refugee
[02:25.680 --> 02:29.720]  crisis which has overwhelmed Europe in recent days, the president has decided to raise the
[02:29.720 --> 02:34.400]  number of Syrian refugees admitted into the United States to at least 10,000 for the fiscal
[02:34.400 --> 02:39.040]  year beginning in October. Since the beginning of the conflict in Syria in 2011, the US has
[02:39.040 --> 02:43.560]  taken in less than 1,500 Syrian refugees. Officials have said that the US may accept
[02:43.560 --> 02:47.880]  an additional 30,000 refugees from across the world next year, up from the current figure
[02:47.880 --> 03:12.880]  of 70,000. More than half of them are children, officials say. This was your Lowdown for September 11, 2013.
[03:18.880 --> 03:26.880]  6 o'clock noon, somebody been shot, somebody been abused, somebody blew up a building,
[03:26.880 --> 03:34.880]  somebody stole their car, somebody got away, somebody didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't
[03:34.880 --> 03:44.880]  get too far. Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day son, a man had an answer for the
[03:44.880 --> 03:51.880]  wicked that he'd done, take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of
[03:51.880 --> 04:01.880]  them dead boys, sing a hymn to the street, for all the people to see. That justice is
[04:01.880 --> 04:07.880]  the one thing you should always find, you gotta saddle up your boys, you gotta draw
[04:07.880 --> 04:14.880]  a hard line, and the guns for the settlers will sing a victory tune, and we'll all be
[04:14.880 --> 04:21.880]  back at the local soon. We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing, West
[04:21.880 --> 04:37.880]  kid for my man, bear for my horses. We ain't got too many gangsters doing 30 days, too
[04:37.880 --> 04:43.880]  much corruption and crime in the streets, it's down the long arm of the law, but a few
[04:43.880 --> 04:47.880]  more friends. Alright folks, good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio
[04:47.880 --> 04:56.880]  Show, it is September 14th, 2015, three days after the anniversary of 9-11. Now folks,
[04:56.880 --> 05:01.880]  you would think that by this time, people would have gotten wise to the official story
[05:01.880 --> 05:08.880]  being the BS, that those with eyes and actual intellect of any magnitude above double digits
[05:08.880 --> 05:16.880]  would know was a complete falsehood from the very beginning. Yet, there are still people
[05:16.880 --> 05:23.880]  that will fight tooth and nail to maintain the illusion of reality that they have got
[05:23.880 --> 05:30.880]  in their mind because it would be so dangerous to their mental stability, it seems, to recognize
[05:30.880 --> 05:37.880]  the fallacy of what we call America these days, and the people that are in charge of
[05:37.880 --> 05:43.880]  it, and how they got that way, and how they're staying that way, and what they're doing to
[05:43.880 --> 05:54.880]  the rest of us to make that so. People have become so dependent on their illusions of
[05:54.880 --> 06:07.880]  truth that they will literally destroy anyone that attempts to expose them to real truth.
[06:07.880 --> 06:16.880]  Now, by no means do I pretend to be the bringer of all truth or that I can recognize a bringer
[06:16.880 --> 06:21.880]  of all truth in all forms. There are certain instances where you may be able to pull the
[06:21.880 --> 06:28.880]  wool over my eyes in a given situation just like you can anyone else's. But I will guarantee
[06:28.880 --> 06:34.880]  you of one thing, you're going to work at it. You're not going to just be able to do
[06:34.880 --> 06:39.880]  it and walk away with a smile on your face. If you're going to fool me into believing
[06:39.880 --> 06:44.880]  something, then you're going to work your behind off. It's going to be the con of a
[06:44.880 --> 06:54.880]  lifetime. Our goal here is to make the rest of you the same way, to stop taking things
[06:54.880 --> 07:01.880]  that are spoon-fed to you through the media, through your government officials, and make
[07:01.880 --> 07:10.880]  you understand that you are being told half-truths if you're being given any truth.
[07:10.880 --> 07:19.880]  It's like one of the books I was reading today on the income tax stuff and how the IRS and
[07:19.880 --> 07:26.880]  the Treasury Department, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the federal courts continuously
[07:26.880 --> 07:35.880]  refuse to apply the code the way it's written and how the IRS in all of its publications
[07:35.880 --> 07:44.880]  on tax protesters and everything like that intentionally and knowingly misconstrues the
[07:44.880 --> 07:53.880]  ruling in the case or what was said in the case and the actual underlying congressional
[07:53.880 --> 08:02.880]  law that governs their ability to levy and collect taxes in the first place. And there
[08:02.880 --> 08:07.880]  are lots of people that have exposed what they do and how they do it.
[08:07.880 --> 08:13.880]  For instance, one of the things that I just could not believe, well, I could believe it,
[08:13.880 --> 08:22.880]  but that just made me shake my head was the audacity with which they argued how the courts
[08:22.880 --> 08:30.880]  ruled on the term includes in relation to the income tax code. Because I know for a
[08:30.880 --> 08:38.880]  fact that what they're saying the case said is completely false. It has to be completely
[08:38.880 --> 08:46.880]  false because the Supreme Court has ruled how to read the word includes in law many,
[08:46.880 --> 08:54.880]  many times and it's been consistently done each time. So no lower federal court is empowered
[08:54.880 --> 09:03.880]  in any way to alter how the term includes is to be applied when used in law.
[09:03.880 --> 09:12.880]  Yet, this IRS publication has the audacity to make the statement that the case law says
[09:12.880 --> 09:19.880]  that the term includes is intended to be entirely expensive. It's not limited only to the things
[09:19.880 --> 09:25.880]  that are listed. That, ladies and gentlemen, is a half truth.
[09:25.880 --> 09:31.880]  They want you to believe the term expensive means anything they care to proclaim to be
[09:31.880 --> 09:40.880]  taxable or defined as an employee or an employer in this case. And it's not true because if
[09:40.880 --> 09:48.880]  it were true then they could call anyone an employee and anyone an employer rather than
[09:48.880 --> 09:56.880]  the class of individual that is listed after includes, which is the limit of their ability
[09:56.880 --> 10:02.880]  to expand what it encompasses. Because the Supreme Court has said that the
[10:02.880 --> 10:15.880]  use of the term includes is it creates a class or type of class in which the expansion must
[10:15.880 --> 10:22.880]  remain, which just like Dr. Graves says in his jurisdictionary describing a lawsuit,
[10:22.880 --> 10:28.880]  when he's talking about the use of the terms includes, when you use includes in law and
[10:28.880 --> 10:37.880]  say if it includes oranges, lemons, grapefruits, and other fruits, what does that actually
[10:37.880 --> 10:44.880]  mean in law? When it says other fruits, does it mean that it includes apples, peaches,
[10:44.880 --> 10:52.880]  bananas, watermelons? No. And the reason it doesn't? Because it gave us the character,
[10:52.880 --> 11:03.880]  the class, the type that includes was limited to but expandable with in the first three,
[11:03.880 --> 11:12.880]  oranges, lemons, and grapefruits. The class or type would be citrus fruits. That's why
[11:12.880 --> 11:20.880]  apples, bananas, watermelons, peaches would not be a part of the definition relating to
[11:20.880 --> 11:29.880]  whatever term is being defined in that inclusion. Because they're not citrus fruits. When the
[11:29.880 --> 11:40.880]  term includes is being used in law, there must be a common denominator that associates
[11:40.880 --> 11:49.880]  all things in the list following the term includes. There has to be something that puts
[11:49.880 --> 11:58.880]  them within the same category, class, or type. And if there isn't, then the interpretation
[11:58.880 --> 12:09.880]  being applied to it can't be done. Because expansion in such a way would make the law
[12:09.880 --> 12:17.880]  that uses it to be vague and ambiguous as to who has a duty under it. Because let's
[12:17.880 --> 12:25.880]  face facts. If they actually meant that it included everybody, all they would have had
[12:25.880 --> 12:34.880]  to have done in the definition employee means any person that works for any other person,
[12:34.880 --> 12:42.880]  company, business, you name it, and gets paid. That's an employee. It would have been that
[12:42.880 --> 12:48.880]  simple if that's how it was intended to be. And this is logic that can't seem to get into
[12:48.880 --> 12:55.880]  an attorney's brain no matter how hard you try. The more they write in a definition about
[12:55.880 --> 13:02.880]  how to precisely define it, the more they're attempting to hide something from you as to
[13:02.880 --> 13:12.880]  what it actually encompasses. That should be evident. And if it's not something that's
[13:12.880 --> 13:19.880]  listed there, then it isn't something to which the definition can apply. But every attorney
[13:19.880 --> 13:27.880]  that you come across tries to argue that includes allows them to expand it in an unlimited
[13:27.880 --> 13:35.880]  fashion when they know that to be a complete and total lie. And if they don't, then they
[13:35.880 --> 13:41.880]  should have never graduated law school. And they certainly shouldn't be out practicing
[13:41.880 --> 13:46.880]  law. But then again, maybe there's a reason why they're constantly practicing because
[13:46.880 --> 13:53.880]  they're inept at getting it right. And practice is all they can do because they never get
[13:53.880 --> 14:07.880]  it right. People, you may think I hate attorneys. That's not true. I loathe attorneys. Okay?
[14:07.880 --> 14:14.880]  Everything about them. Now, there may be good people that have the misfortune to actually
[14:14.880 --> 14:21.880]  be attorneys. But I have to make the same argument about good attorneys that we would
[14:21.880 --> 14:29.880]  make about good cops. Okay? Now, here's the problem when it comes to good cops. There
[14:29.880 --> 14:41.880]  really is no such thing. Why is there no such thing? Well, that, believe it or not, is a
[14:41.880 --> 14:48.880]  self-answering question. And I got somebody staring at me over here, cute as he is. He's
[14:48.880 --> 14:55.880]  sneaking up and watching. Anyway, the problem here is when you have these cops that agree
[14:55.880 --> 15:02.880]  knowing upfront that they are going into a job where they are going to have to enforce
[15:02.880 --> 15:10.880]  arbitrary dictates and ludicrous malicious revenue-generating take advantage of the poor
[15:10.880 --> 15:18.880]  statutory ordinance schemes, and they'd have to know this, and they've taken oath to do
[15:18.880 --> 15:24.880]  this, you can't call them a good cop. When many of these things they're being told that
[15:24.880 --> 15:30.880]  they have to enforce violates constitutional principles and mandates, it causes problems,
[15:30.880 --> 15:37.880]  it's immoral, it would be illegal in any place that followed the rule of law, you can't say
[15:37.880 --> 15:44.880]  they're good cops. They're not good cops. There are no good cops because they go into
[15:44.880 --> 15:49.880]  this job knowing that is what they're going to be expected to do, and they take the job
[15:49.880 --> 15:56.880]  anyway. And when they're in there, you don't see them arresting any of their brethren in
[15:56.880 --> 16:02.880]  blue for the violations that they perpetrate against the public, and the very few that
[16:02.880 --> 16:12.880]  immediately became ostracized, fired, penalized, criminally charged themselves. The question
[16:12.880 --> 16:17.880]  was, is how long did it take them to reach that breaking point where they would dare
[16:17.880 --> 16:24.880]  to intercede so were they good cops before they got to this point, now that we had called
[16:24.880 --> 16:31.880]  them good cops for trying? Don't know. We don't have that prior history to go by. But
[16:31.880 --> 16:36.880]  the fact is, none of them are good. They can't be. Not doing what they do the way they do
[16:36.880 --> 16:42.880]  it and knowing that the system they operate in allows it, encourages it, profits from
[16:42.880 --> 16:49.880]  it, and ensures that none of us have the ability to get redressed for it. All right, folks,
[16:49.880 --> 16:55.880]  we get back on the other side. I'll start taking your calls. 512-646-1984. We'll be
[16:55.880 --> 17:02.880]  right back.
[17:25.880 --> 17:30.880]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[17:30.880 --> 17:35.880]  we reject. We have come to trust Jungevity so much, we became a marketing distributor
[17:35.880 --> 17:42.880]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[17:42.880 --> 17:48.880]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits
[17:48.880 --> 17:53.880]  of Jungevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved
[17:53.880 --> 18:00.880]  health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now. Are you being
[18:00.880 --> 18:05.880]  harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors
[18:05.880 --> 18:10.880]  now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal
[18:10.880 --> 18:15.880]  court against debt collectors, and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions
[18:15.880 --> 18:20.880]  in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do
[18:20.880 --> 18:26.880]  when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. How to answer letters and phone calls. How
[18:26.880 --> 18:30.880]  to get debt collectors out of your credit report. How to turn the financial tables on
[18:30.880 --> 18:36.880]  them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution
[18:36.880 --> 18:41.880]  for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more
[18:41.880 --> 18:46.880]  information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.880 --> 18:53.880]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l
[18:53.880 --> 19:02.880]  m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. You are listening to
[19:02.880 --> 19:22.880]  the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:22.880 --> 19:46.880]  All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[19:46.880 --> 19:51.880]  All right. This is the quote that I wanted to give you and I didn't have it quite right.
[19:51.880 --> 19:58.880]  This is by Dr. Robert Higgs. The good, bad cop question can be disposed of decisively.
[19:58.880 --> 20:04.880]  We need only consider the following. One, every cop has agreed as part of his job to
[20:04.880 --> 20:12.880]  enforce laws, all of them. Two, many of the laws are manifestly unjust or even cruel and
[20:12.880 --> 20:20.880]  wicked. Three, therefore every cop has agreed to act as an enforcer of laws that are manifestly
[20:20.880 --> 20:28.880]  unjust or even cruel and wicked. There are no good cops. Now, that's not coming from
[20:28.880 --> 20:32.880]  me. That's coming from a learned individual, a doctor even. I don't know what he's a doctor
[20:32.880 --> 20:38.880]  of, but he looks smart. But then again, I've seen people that looked at and proved otherwise.
[20:38.880 --> 20:44.880]  All right. That being said, let's start taking some callers. Right now, we have Andrew in
[20:44.880 --> 20:51.880]  Pennsylvania. Andrew, what's up with you and how is ET?
[20:51.880 --> 20:56.880]  All right. Great. I have a more serious issue to discuss with you, Eddie. It appears that
[20:56.880 --> 21:02.880]  you'll become a victim of YouTube censorship. I was trying to look for a comment that you
[21:02.880 --> 21:07.880]  placed on YouTube in the not too distant past on your Infowars presentation. The video secrets
[21:07.880 --> 21:13.880]  police don't want you to know. Someone asked you, can you give us any examples of trial
[21:13.880 --> 21:19.880]  or case law where someone has been successful fighting a traffic ticket? You said in short,
[21:19.880 --> 21:24.880]  no, most of the cases never go to trial. And even if they do, there is a conspiracy of
[21:24.880 --> 21:28.880]  sorts to cover it up. And then you wrote, it works like this. And what I was going to
[21:28.880 --> 21:35.880]  do, I was going to copy and paste that onto some social media networks and say, this is
[21:35.880 --> 21:41.880]  Eddie Craig's explanation for why you can't find a case that shows this stuff being successful.
[21:41.880 --> 21:46.880]  But I found out that that was deleted apparently by the YouTube Nazis. So if it's not too much
[21:46.880 --> 21:50.880]  trouble, could you repeat everything that you would have wrote in that? And after Deborah
[21:50.880 --> 21:54.880]  uploads this to the archives, I will go through the trouble of taking notes and writing down
[21:54.880 --> 21:59.880]  everything you say to write this on social media networks to explain why it is that you
[21:59.880 --> 22:05.880]  cannot find any trials or case law that shows your methods of fighting tickets being successful.
[22:05.880 --> 22:10.880]  Well, like I was saying, for the most part, the reason is, is most of them get quietly
[22:10.880 --> 22:15.880]  dismissed behind the scenes. But when you actually go in and start making the presentation
[22:15.880 --> 22:20.880]  of facts and arguments, we've got several different issues. You have people that don't
[22:20.880 --> 22:24.880]  understand the subject matter well enough to go in and make the proper record for it.
[22:24.880 --> 22:30.880]  So they lose it on appeal because they don't make the proper legal issue at the beginning
[22:30.880 --> 22:38.880]  and keep it at the forefront. But for those that actually do and go through this, here's
[22:38.880 --> 22:47.880]  the problem they run into. The courts, as they exist, refuse to acknowledge that everything
[22:47.880 --> 22:56.880]  that is being presented in the case is 100% presumptive. None of it exists as fact. It
[22:56.880 --> 23:05.880]  is all presumed in the very beginning to the very end. Now, in that presumption, they never
[23:05.880 --> 23:11.880]  look at what is being regulated, the subject matter. They never look at the legislative
[23:11.880 --> 23:17.880]  history to determine what the subject matter is and therefore to determine that in order
[23:17.880 --> 23:23.880]  to regulate someone under the subject matter, the state would first have to prove that they
[23:23.880 --> 23:30.880]  were engaged in the subject matter, which they also never do. But then they maintain
[23:30.880 --> 23:36.880]  the presumption of applicability of all of the terminology and definitions associated
[23:36.880 --> 23:42.880]  through that presumptive instance. For instance, they presume that you are a driver despite
[23:42.880 --> 23:48.880]  any evidence to the contrary that you weren't driving and their lack of evidence that they
[23:48.880 --> 23:54.880]  can't prove you were driving because they would first have to prove that you were engaged
[23:54.880 --> 24:01.880]  in transportation in order to prove that you were driving. They don't go into any of that.
[24:01.880 --> 24:06.880]  I've literally seen courts ignore the fact that the term transportation is not defined
[24:06.880 --> 24:13.880]  in the statute here in Texas at all and refuse to allow you to bring that information into
[24:13.880 --> 24:19.880]  a courtroom and produce it according to the case law that defines what it is, not the
[24:19.880 --> 24:25.880]  legal dictionary. People that are listening, stop trying to introduce the legal dictionary
[24:25.880 --> 24:33.880]  as what a word means in law. If it's not defined in the statute, you get up there and you show
[24:33.880 --> 24:41.880]  them nowhere does the statute contain a definition for this term. However, the term has not failed
[24:41.880 --> 24:48.880]  to be defined. The Supreme Court or the federal court such and such defined it in this way
[24:48.880 --> 24:56.880]  in this case. Since there is no definition in the statute for it, there is a legal definition
[24:56.880 --> 25:04.880]  for it in the legal dictionary supported by this specific case law. And here it is. Then
[25:04.880 --> 25:09.880]  you can bring it up, but most people don't do it correctly and they don't get it in.
[25:09.880 --> 25:15.880]  But the courts continue to apply the terminology for the related subject matter without ever
[25:15.880 --> 25:22.880]  verifying the person was engaged in the regulated activity of whatever the subject matter relates
[25:22.880 --> 25:33.880]  to. For instance, the case law on any criminal act that involves a sales transaction. The
[25:33.880 --> 25:40.880]  prosecutor, in order to prove the offense, must prove that at least there was an attempt
[25:40.880 --> 25:47.880]  to make a sale. And in order to do that, they must prove that person A attempted to sell
[25:47.880 --> 25:55.880]  it to person B. Unless they can prove that, they cannot prove the elements required for
[25:55.880 --> 26:02.880]  that offense. Well, when you look at how the terminology in a given statute relates to
[26:02.880 --> 26:08.880]  the subject matter the statute was written to encompass, you have to come to the same
[26:08.880 --> 26:14.880]  conclusion. Driver, if you want to really understand the definition of a term in a regulatory
[26:14.880 --> 26:20.880]  statute, you have to read it in the context of the code in which it's contained, the
[26:20.880 --> 26:26.880]  regulable subject being regulated. In this case, transportation. So let's read it that
[26:26.880 --> 26:32.880]  way. Driver, someone in physical control of a motor vehicle for the purpose of engaging
[26:32.880 --> 26:40.880]  in transportation. Operator, someone that manages, operates, or physically controls
[26:40.880 --> 26:48.880]  a motor vehicle for the purpose of business for engaging in transportation. You read it
[26:48.880 --> 26:54.880]  in the context like that, it becomes very clear that you can't prove the presumptive
[26:54.880 --> 27:00.880]  definitions application if you can't first prove application of the subject matter. But
[27:00.880 --> 27:08.880]  they don't. They never prove it. They simply presume it. And everything that gets you convicted
[27:08.880 --> 27:17.880]  is 100% presumption because they never proved the framework that supports the rest of the
[27:17.880 --> 27:27.880]  elements. You follow? Yes. Well, I say yes, but there was a lot to swallow there. Like
[27:27.880 --> 27:32.880]  I said. Well, I wrote it out much better because I had time to think about it and lay it out
[27:32.880 --> 27:38.880]  very directly in the comment that I did. But I wanted to make sure that I expanded upon
[27:38.880 --> 27:42.880]  enough that you could understand, everybody could understand how this works and why it
[27:42.880 --> 27:47.880]  must work this way. I mean, it's just like if they're going to regulate you and charge
[27:47.880 --> 27:53.880]  you with a crime of practicing medicine without a license, they would first have to prove
[27:53.880 --> 28:04.880]  that you attempted to sell those services for medical reasons to somebody somewhere
[28:04.880 --> 28:11.880]  and that you had tried to tell them that you were providing them with medical services.
[28:11.880 --> 28:18.880]  So if they can't prove that, how can they prove that you committed that crime? It's
[28:18.880 --> 28:24.880]  like saying, we're charging you with bank robbery. What bank? Well, we're charging you
[28:24.880 --> 28:29.880]  with bank robbery. Do you own a gun? Well, yeah, I own a gun. Do you have any money?
[28:29.880 --> 28:34.880]  Well, yeah, I got money. Then we're charging you with bank robbery. What bank? Until they
[28:34.880 --> 28:42.880]  first prove the bank was robbed and what bank that was, and then link you as being the one
[28:42.880 --> 28:46.880]  in the bank through something more than the presumption of you own a gun and you have
[28:46.880 --> 28:55.880]  money, you robbed the bank. You see what the problem? Yeah. That's what they do in these
[28:55.880 --> 29:04.880]  cases. They start on a false presumption and they never let go of it. Where most people
[29:04.880 --> 29:10.880]  screw up is that they do not object to the application of the deadly sins, which then
[29:10.880 --> 29:16.880]  lays a prima facie foundation to help that presumption maintain its integrity through
[29:16.880 --> 29:23.880]  the system. But if you disavow it and you force them to prove it and they don't, you
[29:23.880 --> 29:30.880]  should win on appeal hands down. But the court never addresses it on appeal. Even if you
[29:30.880 --> 29:36.880]  get it in the record, they ignore it. That's why it's almost impossible today to win a
[29:36.880 --> 29:43.880]  case on the merits of not engaging in transportation, because they ignore it for their presumption,
[29:43.880 --> 29:50.880]  not fact. All right. Anything else? That's everything. That's it. All right. Thanks for
[29:50.880 --> 29:56.880]  calling in, Andrew. All right, folks. 512-646-1984. We're going to take a break. We'll be right
[29:56.880 --> 29:59.880]  back.
[29:59.880 --> 30:06.880]  An apple a day may keep the doctor away, but did you know there's that candy out there
[30:06.880 --> 30:11.880]  that may help cure a cough and heal an ulcer? I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back to tell you
[30:11.880 --> 30:17.880]  about the mystery medicinal candy right after this. Privacy is under attack. When you give
[30:17.880 --> 30:22.880]  up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone,
[30:22.880 --> 30:28.880]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance
[30:28.880 --> 30:34.880]  and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is
[30:34.880 --> 30:39.880]  brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo,
[30:39.880 --> 30:44.880]  and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.880 --> 30:49.880]  It's licorice. For many Americans, the word conjures up the candy we munched on at the
[30:49.880 --> 30:54.880]  movie theater as kids. But did you know that black licorice root can cure a host of illnesses?
[30:54.880 --> 30:59.880]  Get out your notebook, because the list is long. Licorice alleviates heartburn, ulcers,
[30:59.880 --> 31:05.880]  bronchitis, sore throat, cough, Addison's disease, and hepatitis B. It eases the effects
[31:05.880 --> 31:10.880]  of menopause, curbs the parasites that cause malaria, and has even been prescribed for
[31:10.880 --> 31:15.880]  pesticide poisoning in China. Just remember that black licorice root is a medicinal herb,
[31:15.880 --> 31:20.880]  not candy. And eating too much can spike your blood pressure or lead to heart problems.
[31:20.880 --> 31:25.880]  As with most things in life, moderation is the key. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for
[31:25.880 --> 31:30.880]  StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:30.880 --> 31:35.880]  What are you thinking? Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body
[31:35.880 --> 31:41.880]  detox for around $10 a month. If USA.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for
[31:41.880 --> 31:47.880]  absorbing and removing toxins from your kidney, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and
[31:47.880 --> 31:52.880]  feel better than ever, it alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products,
[31:52.880 --> 32:00.880]  that saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367 only at USA.org.
[32:00.880 --> 32:06.880]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America,
[32:06.880 --> 32:09.880]  we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a
[32:09.880 --> 32:13.880]  free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those
[32:13.880 --> 32:16.880]  rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own
[32:16.880 --> 32:20.880]  private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts
[32:20.880 --> 32:24.880]  afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[32:24.880 --> 32:28.880]  through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law
[32:28.880 --> 32:31.880]  Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[32:31.880 --> 32:35.880]  understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get
[32:35.880 --> 32:39.880]  your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering
[32:39.880 --> 32:43.880]  your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas
[32:43.880 --> 32:47.880]  Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:47.880 --> 32:51.880]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight
[32:51.880 --> 32:55.880]  for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today,
[32:55.880 --> 33:00.880]  and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:00.880 --> 33:12.880]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:12.880 --> 33:38.880]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Okay, just to let you folks know,
[33:38.880 --> 33:44.880]  we do have a new sponsor. It is, let me get the page up here. It's one of them kind of
[33:44.880 --> 33:52.880]  days. Non-GMOsolutions.com. It is Non-GMO Storable Foods. I haven't had an opportunity
[33:52.880 --> 33:57.880]  to try them out yet, but obviously if Deborah thinks they're worth putting on the show,
[33:57.880 --> 34:02.880]  maybe there's somebody to take a look at. So give us an opportunity there to show them
[34:02.880 --> 34:05.880]  their money is well invested. If you need some storable food, check with them and see
[34:05.880 --> 34:11.880]  what they can get for you. On top of that, also remember we're trying to get as many
[34:11.880 --> 34:16.880]  of the seminars out there as we can, not just for the money that we need for the network,
[34:16.880 --> 34:23.880]  but folks, the more educated and informed you are, the more you can help expose what's
[34:23.880 --> 34:32.880]  being done to us through the system as it exists. I was so disgusted in class this weekend
[34:32.880 --> 34:39.880]  because one of the things I did in class this weekend was go over an annotated version of
[34:39.880 --> 34:46.880]  the Texas constitution that was written by a Yale law professor named Braden, who obviously
[34:46.880 --> 34:55.880]  has absolutely no clue about the English language. He had the audacity to say that specific entire
[34:55.880 --> 35:03.880]  sections of the Texas constitution were there for no observable purpose. They meant nothing.
[35:03.880 --> 35:09.880]  These are literally his words. It currently has no meaning. And he was talking about in
[35:09.880 --> 35:16.880]  one particular case, article one, section 29, saying that the words in it didn't clearly
[35:16.880 --> 35:24.880]  portray what it was attempting to do and therefore was unnecessary and means nothing in current
[35:24.880 --> 35:29.880]  mode. In other words, he's trying to say the part of the constitution that you can use
[35:29.880 --> 35:34.880]  to force the government to follow the rest of the constitution, we're going to say it
[35:34.880 --> 35:40.880]  doesn't mean anything and thus leave you powerless to make it work. He said the exact same thing
[35:40.880 --> 35:45.880]  about the clause where it said that we have the right to throw out the government, abolish
[35:45.880 --> 35:52.880]  it, destroy it, get rid of it, reform it, and whatever means we deem necessary and proper.
[35:52.880 --> 35:59.880]  That best serves the interest of the people. He said that wasn't worth anything. So folks,
[35:59.880 --> 36:05.880]  these are the kinds of people that are educating the other kinds of people that control the
[36:05.880 --> 36:14.880]  system that is stealing and robbing and taking from you every single day. Idiots abound,
[36:14.880 --> 36:21.880]  statist idiots abound even more. And there's just no way to describe this man's level of
[36:21.880 --> 36:29.880]  integrity and ability to educate as anything but status motivated. And of course, the organization
[36:29.880 --> 36:38.880]  that paid to have his annotated version of the constitution written up and published
[36:38.880 --> 36:47.880]  was our own Texas State Bar Association. Go figure. Why am I not surprised that the fraternity
[36:47.880 --> 36:54.880]  of attorneys attempted to undermine the state constitution by paying some status liberal
[36:54.880 --> 37:00.880]  moron to write a thesis on the constitution that said the parts that give the power to
[37:00.880 --> 37:08.880]  the people don't mean anything. And then he went on even further and said that parts of
[37:08.880 --> 37:13.880]  the Texas constitution did not specifically limit lawmaking power to the legislature,
[37:13.880 --> 37:19.880]  but also gave it to municipalities, to the governor, blah, blah, blah. Baloney. I went
[37:19.880 --> 37:25.880]  through that, his little dissertation on it step by step, and there is no way that it
[37:25.880 --> 37:33.880]  does what he says it does. None. Nowhere is lawmaking power given to a municipality in
[37:33.880 --> 37:40.880]  Texas. Nowhere in the constitution. Through the language it contains, the only way you
[37:40.880 --> 37:47.880]  can even reasonably interpret the one time the word ordinance appears in article 11 of
[37:47.880 --> 37:54.880]  the Texas constitution in relation to municipalities is that it relates to their internal functions.
[37:54.880 --> 38:00.880]  They can write ordinances dealing with their employees, those that contract with them,
[38:00.880 --> 38:06.880]  and those legal entities over whom they're given authority within their territorial boundaries,
[38:06.880 --> 38:13.880]  but they cannot create binding public law. So please forgive me for these rants, but
[38:13.880 --> 38:18.880]  this guy, if I'd have met him in person, I'd have immediately just punched him right
[38:18.880 --> 38:26.880]  in his idiotic mouth, because that was stupid. I mean, it goes beyond stupid with me with
[38:26.880 --> 38:33.880]  these people. All right. Let's go to Michael in Texas. Michael, what can we do for you?
[38:33.880 --> 38:38.880]  Hi, Randy. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. I'm sorry. What show are you calling into?
[38:38.880 --> 38:43.880]  Sorry, sorry. Brain was in the wrong road. Sorry. Switching. Eddie, sorry. Sorry. I'm
[38:43.880 --> 38:46.880]  thinking of something you told, Randy. That's why I said his name. Sorry about that.
[38:46.880 --> 38:52.880]  Hey, I am asking about this securing and executing a document by fraud or deception, something
[38:52.880 --> 38:58.880]  like that. That's why I had Randy on the brain. Sorry. Did that conversation ever go anywhere
[38:58.880 --> 39:04.880]  further than the time it was brought up a week or two ago or maybe a month ago? I was
[39:04.880 --> 39:09.880]  very intrigued by that because from what I'm hearing you two talk about that, when the
[39:09.880 --> 39:14.880]  policeman pulls you over, you agree to sign and appear based on the understanding that
[39:14.880 --> 39:17.880]  you're going to appear before us. Nah, just straight. And yet when you go there and you
[39:17.880 --> 39:22.880]  try to take advantage of that little offer, they pull the rug out from under you and try
[39:22.880 --> 39:27.880]  to make you cop a plea. It doesn't sound very proper and right at all.
[39:27.880 --> 39:33.880]  It isn't. And this I've also covered in my class twice. What they've actually done is
[39:33.880 --> 39:39.880]  knowingly and intentionally set you up to fail in complying with the citation. And this
[39:39.880 --> 39:44.880]  is the major factor in what they're doing, the way that it works in reality. I don't
[39:44.880 --> 39:48.880]  care what they tell you they're doing and why they're doing it. In reality, this is
[39:48.880 --> 39:54.880]  exactly how it plays out. You sign the citation promising to appear on or before a certain
[39:54.880 --> 40:00.880]  date before a magistrate, not a clerk, not a cop, not anyone else, a magistrate. You
[40:00.880 --> 40:09.880]  go in, you are told you cannot see the magistrate, which in Texas would be an ex parte communication
[40:09.880 --> 40:14.880]  if it deals with anything specifically relating to the facts of the case. That does not mean
[40:14.880 --> 40:21.880]  that you can have zero contact with the magistrate. It simply means you cannot discuss the facts
[40:21.880 --> 40:30.880]  of the case with the magistrate. All right? So you're not allowed to see the magistrate.
[40:30.880 --> 40:38.880]  Then the clerk attempts to do what the magistrate is the only one authorized to do, get you
[40:38.880 --> 40:45.880]  to enter a plea or some other judicial function that only a magistrate or judge is authorized
[40:45.880 --> 40:53.880]  by law to do. When you don't do fill out their paperwork or when you won't enter a plea in
[40:53.880 --> 41:00.880]  front of the clerk, what they do then is fill out paperwork saying that you failed to appear
[41:00.880 --> 41:07.880]  before the magistrate in compliance with the citation, even though they were the ones that
[41:07.880 --> 41:17.880]  obstructed your ability to do so. That is the groundwork for what we discussed. That's
[41:17.880 --> 41:26.880]  how you get there. They have set you up for failure to comply before you ever step foot
[41:26.880 --> 41:40.880]  in the building. Make sense? Yes, sir. Do you have time to discuss one or two other issues?
[41:40.880 --> 41:45.880]  I do unless my head explodes. I just wasn't sure how full the caller board was. It's full
[41:45.880 --> 41:48.880]  at the moment, but there's only two minutes left in this segment, so I'm going to see
[41:48.880 --> 41:58.880]  how quick you are. The other issue that I want to discuss with you has to do with this
[41:58.880 --> 42:10.880]  idea that when you're brought before the court and you want to get information on the record,
[42:10.880 --> 42:15.880]  you had mentioned in a prior podcast or prior show that that can be very, very challenging
[42:15.880 --> 42:19.880]  and there's a very specific technique that you use to do that, because I know from my
[42:19.880 --> 42:24.880]  experience, it's not at all easy sometimes. They fight it tooth and nail trying to get
[42:24.880 --> 42:28.880]  information into the record. They want to limit your discussion and the things you can
[42:28.880 --> 42:34.880]  say and ask to just cross-examining their so-called witness. Exactly, and what they're
[42:34.880 --> 42:40.880]  literally doing is tampering with your ability to put on a vigorous defense. They are literally
[42:40.880 --> 42:45.880]  railroading you through these courts when they do this, and this is how and why they do it.
[42:45.880 --> 42:49.880]  But yeah, there is a particular way to get things in through judicial notice and things
[42:49.880 --> 42:57.880]  like that. You can also pre-file judicial notice motions before you ever go in there,
[42:57.880 --> 43:02.880]  and you can demand that the court take judicial notice of certain facts asserted in those
[43:02.880 --> 43:11.880]  motions before you ever go to trial. How do you force them to do just that?
[43:11.880 --> 43:16.880]  You're not forcing them to do anything. Let's put it like this, okay? Imagine these
[43:16.880 --> 43:23.880]  two scenarios. You file motions asking the court to take judicial notice of the actual
[43:23.880 --> 43:29.880]  statutes that they're charging you with, right? The court denies the motion saying,
[43:29.880 --> 43:34.880]  I don't care what the law is. I don't want to hear what the law is. It would be the same
[43:34.880 --> 43:38.880]  thing as putting in a motion to the court and saying, Judge, I demand to have a fair
[43:38.880 --> 43:46.880]  and impartial trial from you, and the judge saying, Motion denied. You follow?
[43:46.880 --> 43:50.880]  Yes, sir. Okay, hang on just a second, Michael. We're going to take a break. We'll finish
[43:50.880 --> 44:00.880]  this on the other side. All right, folks, 512-646-1984. If you can't get on, keep trying.
[44:00.880 --> 44:05.880]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with
[44:05.880 --> 44:11.880]  Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how
[44:11.880 --> 44:18.880]  in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.880 --> 44:23.880]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won
[44:23.880 --> 44:29.880]  with our step by step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a
[44:29.880 --> 44:35.880]  licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[44:35.880 --> 44:40.880]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that
[44:40.880 --> 44:47.880]  control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[44:47.880 --> 44:54.880]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[44:54.880 --> 45:00.880]  and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.880 --> 45:08.880]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by
[45:08.880 --> 45:13.880]  our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas. I'm Brave New Books
[45:13.880 --> 45:18.880]  and Chase Banks to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.880 --> 45:22.880]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:22.880 --> 45:27.880]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil,
[45:27.880 --> 45:35.880]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find
[45:35.880 --> 45:43.880]  us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:43.880 --> 46:06.880]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:13.880 --> 46:29.880]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are still talking to
[46:29.880 --> 46:37.880]  Michael in Texas. Call in number 512-646-1984. All right, Michael, continue, please.
[46:37.880 --> 46:44.880]  Okay, that was very helpful, the last comment you made there. Now, the other thing I was
[46:44.880 --> 46:49.880]  curious about was there was a comment that Mr. Kelton made on your show or vice versa.
[46:49.880 --> 46:55.880]  I think it was, yeah, I think he was a guest on your show. And I believe his parting comments
[46:55.880 --> 47:01.880]  were that he had used some of your techniques and recommendations on some motions that he
[47:01.880 --> 47:05.880]  submitted before the courts, and they basically dismissed it out of hand. I was curious to
[47:05.880 --> 47:12.880]  know if there was something in particular that some nuggets of wisdom that the rest
[47:12.880 --> 47:14.880]  of us can draw from that.
[47:14.880 --> 47:19.880]  Well, if you have the seminar material, those nuggets of wisdom are written into the documents
[47:19.880 --> 47:25.880]  he filed. He did exactly what everyone else is supposed to do with the documents. You
[47:25.880 --> 47:31.880]  edit them according to the specific details in it that need to be edited for you. You
[47:31.880 --> 47:37.880]  file it for the proper court that applies to your case, and you read and understand
[47:37.880 --> 47:43.880]  the whole document before you file it. If you do that, then you can go in there and
[47:43.880 --> 47:51.880]  argue what's in it. And sometimes, if they actually bother to read it, they understand
[47:51.880 --> 47:59.880]  that they can't win the argument, and they quit before it ever starts.
[47:59.880 --> 48:03.880]  Fair enough. All right. Well, I think I've exhausted my questions. Thank you, Eddie.
[48:03.880 --> 48:05.880]  Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in.
[48:05.880 --> 48:13.880]  Yeah, folks, I spent a lot of time, research, and effort writing the stuff that's in those
[48:13.880 --> 48:18.880]  400-plus documents in the seminar material, the legal pleadings that are in there. You
[48:18.880 --> 48:25.880]  will not find a lot of case law in most of them. And the reason is, is because there
[48:25.880 --> 48:31.880]  have never been any cases that address the specific arguments the way I'm making them.
[48:31.880 --> 48:37.880]  They haven't addressed them. And the few that have addressed them have addressed them in
[48:37.880 --> 48:43.880]  ways that are completely wrong. And the reason they're wrong is because they addressed only
[48:43.880 --> 48:50.880]  a specific small part of the subject matter that they're arguing over out of context of
[48:50.880 --> 48:56.880]  all of the rest of the statutes covering the same subject matter. And then once you put
[48:56.880 --> 49:02.880]  that back in context, everything changes. It has no choice. Proving the court did it
[49:02.880 --> 49:08.880]  wrong, which they hate to admit, but the whole purpose of those documents is to make the
[49:08.880 --> 49:11.880]  argument that you screwed up, you know you screwed up, here's a good chance for you to
[49:11.880 --> 49:18.880]  fix it before you cause any more harm to the people. Whether or not they'll do it depends
[49:18.880 --> 49:24.880]  upon us, how well educated we are on what they did and how they did it, how diligent
[49:24.880 --> 49:29.880]  we are in demanding that they fix it and how diligent we are in demanding that they stop
[49:29.880 --> 49:35.880]  using methodologies like that to take advantage of us and steal.
[49:35.880 --> 49:42.880]  All right. Now we're going to go to, well, I don't know if it's Josie or Jose or somebody
[49:42.880 --> 49:56.880]  in New York. Who we got? Yeah, we got Joe. Joe. Okay. Well, I got Josie's. Well, yeah,
[49:56.880 --> 50:04.880]  I called, oh geez, that could be me. And I was telling you about a case where I was,
[50:04.880 --> 50:11.880]  you know, being charged with, you know, possession of marijuana and like that. And I want to
[50:11.880 --> 50:16.880]  let you know that it worked out real good. It would have worked out a lot better if I'd
[50:16.880 --> 50:24.880]  had a few more weeks to prepare. But I went after them on the grounds that, you know,
[50:24.880 --> 50:31.880]  they couldn't name an officer person, you know, which I, you know, possessed the marijuana
[50:31.880 --> 50:37.880]  in my home through. And also, you know, I wondered how they were going to turn personal
[50:37.880 --> 50:45.880]  possession into simple possession. And, you know, then my third argument was, you know,
[50:45.880 --> 50:54.880]  where in the lot does it say that, you know, a police department's policy can transmutate
[50:54.880 --> 51:02.880]  the, you know, what the public health code says. And, you know, I brought those arguments
[51:02.880 --> 51:06.880]  to my attorney. He didn't want anything to do with them. He didn't want to defend me.
[51:06.880 --> 51:11.880]  He said that, you know, I originally agreed to a plea bargain and that's all he was willing
[51:11.880 --> 51:15.880]  to do. So I fired him. Right. And that's all that anyone's going to be willing to do.
[51:15.880 --> 51:21.880]  Just another reason I despise attorneys. So four hours later, he calls me up, says he
[51:21.880 --> 51:26.880]  had a long talk with the DA and the DA was willing to be flexible. And I asked him, well,
[51:26.880 --> 51:31.880]  you know, which of my arguments was he most afraid of? I said, well, I certainly didn't
[51:31.880 --> 51:38.880]  show him any of your arguments. I'm like, okay, yeah, sure you didn't. So I went to
[51:38.880 --> 51:43.880]  court the next day. They wouldn't let the public into the, under the floor of the court
[51:43.880 --> 51:51.880]  house. Like everyone, everybody was fed. Oh, that's a big no-no. Yeah, I know. So, you
[51:51.880 --> 51:54.880]  know, I thought they were going to, you know, they thought they were going to scare me.
[51:54.880 --> 51:59.880]  And I just said, well, obviously I have them by the tender parts or they wouldn't be doing
[51:59.880 --> 52:05.880]  that. So, you know, they came to me with a plea offer that I didn't like. And I, then
[52:05.880 --> 52:12.880]  I told the attorney and I said, unless the charge is so teeny tiny that it's not my,
[52:12.880 --> 52:20.880]  worth my time to bother with, you know, I think we don't need the DA to tangle. And
[52:20.880 --> 52:27.880]  so they went back and had a meeting and they came back with an offer of a misdemeanor,
[52:27.880 --> 52:34.880]  you know, possession of an ounce and, you know, pay a fine and do some, you know, probation.
[52:34.880 --> 52:41.880]  So I said, well, that sounds pretty small, you know, considering I was facing a B and
[52:41.880 --> 52:48.880]  C felony. So then they brought me this like three page probationary contract. And I just
[52:48.880 --> 52:54.880]  said, well, no, that's not happening. No, I'm only going to do what, you know, they
[52:54.880 --> 52:59.880]  absolutely, you know, are required to do by law, you know, they'll see them, you know,
[52:59.880 --> 53:03.880]  every couple of weeks and they can come check my house and make sure I'm not misbehaving
[53:03.880 --> 53:11.880]  and like that. As far as everything else, no, you know, the DA doesn't like it, you
[53:11.880 --> 53:19.880]  know, but, you know, let's tangle. And so they called me into the courtroom, my sister
[53:19.880 --> 53:25.880]  and I, and there was a lot of yelling and screaming in the judges chambers. And finally
[53:25.880 --> 53:34.880]  the DA and my attorney came out, they were pretty red faced and threw the probation thing
[53:34.880 --> 53:41.880]  on the table there and everything I wanted was granted. And he said, there, are you happy
[53:41.880 --> 53:45.880]  with that? You know, the judge came out, sat down and I said, well, I should tell you a
[53:45.880 --> 53:51.880]  lot. Well, I looked it over and I said, well, if I was a woman, I'd run up there and kiss
[53:51.880 --> 53:59.880]  that man. So I signed it. And then I looked at the DA and I said, geez, you know, I really
[53:59.880 --> 54:05.880]  wanted to go toe to toe with you, but you've been such a sweetheart, I can't bring myself
[54:05.880 --> 54:12.880]  to it. So yeah, I had a really, really good time. You know, like I said, if I'd hit a
[54:12.880 --> 54:18.880]  few more weeks, I would have just told the DA, let's go. You know, but I, but I was,
[54:18.880 --> 54:26.880]  I didn't feel that I, at the time, I was prepared enough, you know, to, you know, demand a
[54:26.880 --> 54:32.880]  contest. But you know, I mean, you got to learn as you go. You know, all things considered,
[54:32.880 --> 54:39.880]  I think under the circumstances it worked out real well for me. And my probation officer,
[54:39.880 --> 54:45.880]  you know, loves what I'm doing. I've been feeding him all kinds of laws, fun stuff.
[54:45.880 --> 54:52.880]  But at any rate, next thing, I want to play devil's advocate with one of my mentors. What
[54:52.880 --> 55:01.880]  you were talking about with the IRS and, you know, defining includes to be inexpensive
[55:01.880 --> 55:10.880]  rather than a restrictive concept. Well, I'm thinking that the IRS operates under private
[55:10.880 --> 55:16.880]  law. All right. You know, the, you know, the, the common law, the public law, you know,
[55:16.880 --> 55:23.880]  doesn't apply to them. As I recall, if I got my facts right, they're an arm in the IMF.
[55:23.880 --> 55:30.880]  And, you know, in the private law, I mean, they're constantly defining, you know, their
[55:30.880 --> 55:37.880]  terms, their way. What would, I mean, you know, since, you know, they're operating under
[55:37.880 --> 55:44.880]  private law, why can't they define includes to mean whatever they wanted to? I guess that's
[55:44.880 --> 55:53.880]  my question to you. Well, the problem there is not what binds them. It's what they're
[55:53.880 --> 56:02.880]  attempting to use to bind you to engage with them. Absolutely. Okay. Yeah. Okay. So I got
[56:02.880 --> 56:08.880]  it. So, so their private law wouldn't apply if they're attempting to bring you into a
[56:08.880 --> 56:16.880]  contract where there's no contract presently exists. Well, the issue here is not in their
[56:16.880 --> 56:24.880]  eyes is not one of contract. It is what they, it is what law refers to as a legal duty.
[56:24.880 --> 56:31.880]  You don't have to have a contract with someone to have a legal duty, not to cause them harm
[56:31.880 --> 56:39.880]  or to act in a way that would prevent you yourself from causing them a harm. In other
[56:39.880 --> 56:47.880]  words, be self-regulating. What the IRS is attempting to do is to get you to comply with
[56:47.880 --> 56:53.880]  regulations that never applied to you in a way that makes it appear as if it did. And
[56:53.880 --> 57:01.880]  they do that by knowingly and intentionally misconstruing what the actual law says. What
[57:01.880 --> 57:08.880]  they rely on is their treasury regulations in place of the underlying congressional acts,
[57:08.880 --> 57:14.880]  which expands their power beyond what the law allows, which is what makes their acts
[57:14.880 --> 57:19.880]  illegal. Well, I'm really glad I asked that question because you really cleared it up
[57:19.880 --> 57:29.880]  nice with that response. I thank you. Yes, sir. Now I've got seven traffic citations
[57:29.880 --> 57:41.880]  that were acquired by a friend of mine. And we went to court and all my friend said was
[57:41.880 --> 57:47.880]  I don't intend to plead. And the judge goes, whoa, whoa, whoa, we're not going there. He
[57:47.880 --> 57:52.880]  said, you know, he had two to take care of last week and he's got the others to take
[57:52.880 --> 57:56.880]  care of next week. He said, we're going to combine those all together and you're going
[57:56.880 --> 58:05.880]  to go talk to DA. And, you know, then, you know, if there's anything to litigate, you
[58:05.880 --> 58:12.880]  can come see me next week. I've got something I want to throw at you. I hear some music
[58:12.880 --> 58:17.880]  in the background. Yeah, we're about to take a break. So if you'll hang on, we'll pick
[58:17.880 --> 58:22.880]  up on the other side and let you finish out. Okay. Thank you. Yes. All right, folks, we
[58:22.880 --> 58:29.880]  are at our top of the hour break. We got an hour to go. That's four more segments. 512-646-1984
[58:29.880 --> 58:32.880]  is the call in number. If you want to call in and get on the board. If it's busy or you
[58:32.880 --> 58:37.880]  don't make it, keep calling back. I'll get to you as quick as I can. All right. We'll
[58:37.880 --> 58:49.880]  be right back. So y'all hang on.
[58:49.880 --> 58:55.880]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.880 --> 59:00.880]  because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying
[59:00.880 --> 59:06.880]  the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. Enter
[59:06.880 --> 59:13.880]  the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the
[59:13.880 --> 59:19.880]  real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages
[59:19.880 --> 59:24.880]  are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond
[59:24.880 --> 59:30.880]  which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free
[59:30.880 --> 59:36.880]  recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours
[59:36.880 --> 59:47.880]  just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.880 --> 01:00:02.880]  That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.880 --> 01:00:07.880]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily
[01:00:07.880 --> 01:00:14.880]  bulletins for the commodities market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop
[01:00:14.880 --> 01:00:25.880]  into the tides of the alternatives. Markets for the 11th of September 2015 opened up with
[01:00:25.880 --> 01:00:34.880]  gold $1,110.50 an ounce, silver $14.69 an ounce, Texas crude $45.92 a barrel, and Bitcoin
[01:00:34.880 --> 01:00:46.880]  is currently sitting at about $239 U.S. currency. Today in history, Tuesday, September 11, 2001,
[01:00:46.880 --> 01:00:51.880]  the World Trade Center complex in downtown Manhattan, New York is attacked by terrorists.
[01:00:51.880 --> 01:00:55.880]  19 Saudi hijackers managed to crash two commercial airlines into the World Trade Center Twin
[01:00:55.880 --> 01:01:00.880]  Towers, a third into the Pentagon, and the last fourth hijacked plane was debris scattered
[01:01:00.880 --> 01:01:07.880]  over miles near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. In total 2,996 people lost their lives, including
[01:01:07.880 --> 01:01:13.880]  the hijackers. Over 220 senior military intelligence service members, law enforcement, government
[01:01:13.880 --> 01:01:19.880]  officials, 1,500 engineers and architects, 250 pilots and aviation professionals, 400
[01:01:19.880 --> 01:01:25.880]  professors, 300 survivors and family members, 200 artists, entertainers, and media professionals,
[01:01:25.880 --> 01:01:29.880]  and over 400 medical professionals have all come out and labeled these attacks as false
[01:01:29.880 --> 01:01:38.880]  flags. They are calling for an investigation. In recent news, New York's Governor Andrew
[01:01:38.880 --> 01:01:43.880]  Cuomo's administration formally approved a $15 minimum wage for fast food employees yesterday.
[01:01:43.880 --> 01:01:47.880]  The state plans to gradually implement the mandate over a three-year period for New York
[01:01:47.880 --> 01:01:51.880]  City and a six-year period for the rest of the state. Republicans also held a hearing
[01:01:51.880 --> 01:01:55.880]  into the process behind the fast food wage increase, which some restaurant owners have
[01:01:55.880 --> 01:01:59.880]  said they may challenge in court. Franchise owners say that the increase singles them
[01:01:59.880 --> 01:02:03.880]  out and gives an unfair advantage to mom and pop competitors. They are warning that many
[01:02:03.880 --> 01:02:08.880]  franchises may be forced to raise prices or cut positions in order to absorb the higher
[01:02:08.880 --> 01:02:18.880]  mandated labor costs. The pay increase is expected to affect some 200,000 employees.
[01:02:18.880 --> 01:02:22.880]  White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said in a briefing yesterday that while the
[01:02:22.880 --> 01:02:25.880]  administration was continuing to examine responses to refugee crisis, which has
[01:02:25.880 --> 01:02:29.880]  overwhelmed Europe in the recent days, the president has decided to raise the number
[01:02:29.880 --> 01:02:33.880]  of Syrian refugees admitted into the United States to at least 10,000 for the fiscal
[01:02:33.880 --> 01:02:38.880]  year beginning in October. Since the beginning of the conflict in Syria in 2011, the U.S.
[01:02:38.880 --> 01:02:42.880]  has taken in less than 1,500 Syrian refugees. Officials have said that the U.S. may accept
[01:02:42.880 --> 01:02:46.880]  an additional 30,000 refugees from across the world next year, up from the current
[01:02:46.880 --> 01:02:54.880]  figure of 70,000. More than half of them are children, officials say.
[01:02:54.880 --> 01:03:04.880]  This was your Lowdown for September 11, 2013.
[01:03:24.880 --> 01:03:52.880]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:52.880 --> 01:03:58.880]  All right, we're going to finish up with Joe in New York. All right, Joe, go ahead.
[01:03:58.880 --> 01:04:05.880]  Okay, well, I was looking over some of my work. I'm getting ready to do a 1983 on the
[01:04:05.880 --> 01:04:14.880]  tax issue. And, you know, I was comparing some of the claims I'm making, you know,
[01:04:14.880 --> 01:04:20.880]  against, you know, our tax department. And they were looking like, well, I get the
[01:04:20.880 --> 01:04:27.880]  notice that some of them look pretty good, you know, as far as bringing up, you know,
[01:04:27.880 --> 01:04:33.880]  in relation to these tickets. And these, I think, I might have hit on something, and
[01:04:33.880 --> 01:04:38.880]  I'm going to go forward with it. So it should be interesting to see how this works out.
[01:04:38.880 --> 01:04:44.880]  I got to go meet with the DA sometime this week once I, you know, put together a little
[01:04:44.880 --> 01:04:50.880]  presentation for her. I wanted to run this by you and, you know, get your opinion on
[01:04:50.880 --> 01:04:56.880]  it. Now, you know, naturally, I'm going to, you know, be accusing them of, you know,
[01:04:56.880 --> 01:05:03.880]  declaring a false emergency, issuing a bill of pains and penalties, you know, subjecting
[01:05:03.880 --> 01:05:09.880]  my friend to a foreign jurisdiction. I'm going to accuse the officers of legal practice
[01:05:09.880 --> 01:05:15.880]  of law and exorbitant prosperity and false arrest because they had no reasonable cause.
[01:05:15.880 --> 01:05:21.880]  They had no cause whatever. He was given tickets on two occasions, one with my van,
[01:05:21.880 --> 01:05:28.880]  which is not registered, you know, because it doesn't need to be, and another car that
[01:05:28.880 --> 01:05:33.880]  he bought in a private sale. And of course, you know, that he registered the car immediately.
[01:05:33.880 --> 01:05:40.880]  Now, they didn't, they didn't tow my van, but they did tow the car. So, you know, I
[01:05:40.880 --> 01:05:48.880]  was going to go ahead. I'm thinking operation of a criminal enterprise, a personage, you
[01:05:48.880 --> 01:05:53.880]  know, because, you know, there's this irreparable presumption of the office of person in play.
[01:05:53.880 --> 01:05:59.880]  Well, the facts clearly prove that no such office, you know, extend as far as, you know,
[01:05:59.880 --> 01:06:06.880]  being applicable to my friend. Forced conversion of a personal private property to commercial
[01:06:06.880 --> 01:06:12.880]  property for revenue generating purposes in violation of the Clayton Antitrust Act, falsifying
[01:06:12.880 --> 01:06:17.880]  government documents for the purpose of financial gain for municipal corporation in violation
[01:06:17.880 --> 01:06:24.880]  of the Sherman Antitrust Act, falsifying documents to records, creating fictitious obligations,
[01:06:24.880 --> 01:06:32.880]  conspiracy to defraud by a conventional contract by subjecting my friend to a court coercion,
[01:06:32.880 --> 01:06:39.880]  well, cursing my friend to accept a contractual obligation subsequent to the allegation of
[01:06:39.880 --> 01:06:47.880]  violation of that contract, official misconduct, fraud, threat of extortion, well, extortion,
[01:06:47.880 --> 01:06:53.880]  felony theft, threat of aggravated armed robbery, aggravated armed robbery in the second occasion,
[01:06:53.880 --> 01:06:58.880]  of course, we've got threat of aggravated assault and battery, willful intent to injure
[01:06:58.880 --> 01:07:05.880]  another, malicious acts, domestic terrorism, and what I'm using there is use of force or
[01:07:05.880 --> 01:07:08.880]  violence to intimidate, of course, lawful governance.
[01:07:08.880 --> 01:07:13.880]  Okay. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Joe, Joe, we don't need to go through the whole penal code here.
[01:07:13.880 --> 01:07:18.880]  Suffice it to say that if a public servant was charged every day with the crimes they
[01:07:18.880 --> 01:07:22.880]  committed, they'd all be on death row tomorrow.
[01:07:22.880 --> 01:07:29.880]  Yeah, well, I'm going to wrap all this up into 1983. I'm going to hit them with Rico
[01:07:29.880 --> 01:07:36.880]  and going after the judge, any judge that does not comply with the results to the Constitution.
[01:07:36.880 --> 01:07:41.880]  The United States wars against that Constitution. That's the Cooper versus Aaron.
[01:07:41.880 --> 01:07:44.880]  And then if they say, well, you know, he isn't a judge, and I'll say, well, here's one for
[01:07:44.880 --> 01:07:51.880]  any second judicial officer when he wars against the Constitution.
[01:07:51.880 --> 01:07:56.880]  He can't do that without violating both, you know, support it.
[01:07:56.880 --> 01:08:00.880]  And that's Henry versus Sawyer.
[01:08:00.880 --> 01:08:03.880]  U.S. versus Will for 49-200.
[01:08:03.880 --> 01:08:08.880]  Collins versus Virginia, 19 U.S. to 64.
[01:08:08.880 --> 01:08:14.880]  And then I got about a dozen other ones that are possible, depending on how this thing plays out.
[01:08:14.880 --> 01:08:24.880]  But I'm going to wrap this up into a little 1983 and, you know, figure out what all this is supposed to be worth.
[01:08:24.880 --> 01:08:25.880]  Well, good luck.
[01:08:25.880 --> 01:08:26.880]  Let's see where it goes.
[01:08:26.880 --> 01:08:30.880]  Well, it's going to be fun.
[01:08:30.880 --> 01:08:37.880]  But the thing is, if I can get some kind of, you know, a positive outcome on this, that should be interesting.
[01:08:37.880 --> 01:08:39.880]  We could spread this thing around to people.
[01:08:39.880 --> 01:08:46.880]  People really got to learn how it's not enough to get your tickets thrown out or, you know, to get people to lay it out.
[01:08:46.880 --> 01:08:50.880]  You got to kick them in the butt or they'll just keep doing it.
[01:08:50.880 --> 01:08:55.880]  You know, that's that hard leap that, you know, so many of us just don't take.
[01:08:55.880 --> 01:08:56.880]  We don't know how. We don't want it.
[01:08:56.880 --> 01:08:57.880]  It's a lot of work.
[01:08:57.880 --> 01:09:01.880]  But I mean, if you're going to defend your rights, you got to defend them.
[01:09:01.880 --> 01:09:02.880]  You got to attack.
[01:09:02.880 --> 01:09:08.880]  You got to learn how to kick people's butts when they, you know, do evil stuff to you.
[01:09:08.880 --> 01:09:11.880]  Or they're just going to keep doing it.
[01:09:11.880 --> 01:09:20.880]  You know, geez, YouTube is full of all these people that got their, you know, got their, you know, tickets expunged.
[01:09:20.880 --> 01:09:26.880]  You know, to get the prosecutor to, you know, withdraw the...
[01:09:26.880 --> 01:09:31.880]  But, you know, it doesn't start from doing it to the next thousand people.
[01:09:31.880 --> 01:09:34.880]  You know, they got to be burned.
[01:09:34.880 --> 01:09:36.880]  We got to learn how to do this stuff.
[01:09:36.880 --> 01:09:42.880]  You know, every once in a while somebody gets them for a few million dollars and it gets around.
[01:09:42.880 --> 01:09:43.880]  You know, maybe things will change a little.
[01:09:43.880 --> 01:09:46.880]  What do you think?
[01:09:46.880 --> 01:09:49.880]  I think it's great in theory.
[01:09:49.880 --> 01:09:50.880]  We will see.
[01:09:50.880 --> 01:09:59.880]  But unless you actually have someone or you get someone that will do what they are supposed to do under the rule of law,
[01:09:59.880 --> 01:10:04.880]  I can't say that it would work as you would hope.
[01:10:04.880 --> 01:10:07.880]  They've proven it too many times.
[01:10:07.880 --> 01:10:20.880]  Well, I guess my enthusiasm is just based on a fellow that I learned about down in Florida who helped a friend, you know,
[01:10:20.880 --> 01:10:24.880]  had his house seized for, you know, no taxes.
[01:10:24.880 --> 01:10:29.880]  And, you know, he just went forward and said, gee, there's no citizen on the property.
[01:10:29.880 --> 01:10:32.880]  There's no signed assessments.
[01:10:32.880 --> 01:10:35.880]  We want $400 million.
[01:10:35.880 --> 01:10:41.880]  And they ended up walking out after, you know, four days of negotiations with $34 million.
[01:10:41.880 --> 01:10:46.880]  You know, there have been a handful of folks that have, you know, followed suit.
[01:10:46.880 --> 01:10:50.880]  So I'm thinking, wow, if it works in the tax code, why not the motor vehicle?
[01:10:50.880 --> 01:11:00.880]  You know, his theory is that, you know, if you take state actors to federal court and federal actors to state court,
[01:11:00.880 --> 01:11:06.880]  you've got a halfway decent chance if you learn to do it right.
[01:11:06.880 --> 01:11:12.880]  So I guess I'm giving it a crack, see how it goes.
[01:11:12.880 --> 01:11:17.880]  Maybe it'll, you know, it's just getting people to learn how to do it right.
[01:11:17.880 --> 01:11:19.880]  What do you think?
[01:11:19.880 --> 01:11:22.880]  Like I said, you give it a shot.
[01:11:22.880 --> 01:11:29.880]  I'm not going to hold my breath for an outcome, but give it a shot.
[01:11:29.880 --> 01:11:31.880]  It will do.
[01:11:31.880 --> 01:11:32.880]  All right.
[01:11:32.880 --> 01:11:33.880]  Good luck.
[01:11:33.880 --> 01:11:34.880]  Yep.
[01:11:34.880 --> 01:11:36.880]  I'll keep you impressed to what goes on.
[01:11:36.880 --> 01:11:43.880]  And I thank you for all the wonderful knowledge and advice you've given to me.
[01:11:43.880 --> 01:11:44.880]  You're welcome.
[01:11:44.880 --> 01:11:46.880]  Glad I could help.
[01:11:46.880 --> 01:11:47.880]  Yes.
[01:11:47.880 --> 01:11:48.880]  Appreciate it.
[01:11:48.880 --> 01:11:49.880]  You have a good night.
[01:11:49.880 --> 01:11:50.880]  You too, Joe.
[01:11:50.880 --> 01:11:51.880]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:11:51.880 --> 01:11:52.880]  Yep.
[01:11:52.880 --> 01:11:53.880]  Bye-bye.
[01:11:53.880 --> 01:11:54.880]  All right.
[01:11:54.880 --> 01:11:55.880]  Now we're going to go to Mark in Florida.
[01:11:55.880 --> 01:11:58.880]  Mark, I got about five minutes for a break.
[01:11:58.880 --> 01:12:00.880]  How far can we get?
[01:12:00.880 --> 01:12:02.880]  Well, we can get part of the way.
[01:12:02.880 --> 01:12:07.880]  I spoke with you back in December about, well, I gave you a little background myself.
[01:12:07.880 --> 01:12:13.880]  I'm a 58-year-old ex-marine avionics tech, former construction worker.
[01:12:13.880 --> 01:12:18.880]  Of course, there's no construction, so I've gone from making a couple of tiles a week
[01:12:18.880 --> 01:12:24.880]  to walking with a piece of cardboard, soliciting, fan handling, line of sign,
[01:12:24.880 --> 01:12:27.880]  whatever you want to call it.
[01:12:27.880 --> 01:12:31.880]  I had many problems with the police, and I just had a new encounter.
[01:12:31.880 --> 01:12:36.880]  Kind of caught me off guard, and I wanted to get your opinion on a couple things.
[01:12:36.880 --> 01:12:37.880]  All right.
[01:12:37.880 --> 01:12:39.880]  I'll see what I can do.
[01:12:39.880 --> 01:12:40.880]  All right.
[01:12:40.880 --> 01:12:46.880]  I was in Sunrise, Florida, who has a police department that I know very well.
[01:12:46.880 --> 01:12:52.880]  Nine charges from them, three misdemeanors, and six civil.
[01:12:52.880 --> 01:13:00.880]  All for exercising my right to free speech while not obstructing traffic
[01:13:00.880 --> 01:13:04.880]  or any false claim that they have.
[01:13:04.880 --> 01:13:13.880]  But on this particular day, a sheriff pulled up with his lights on, waved me over to him.
[01:13:13.880 --> 01:13:16.880]  When I got up to him, he said, I can't be out there.
[01:13:16.880 --> 01:13:20.880]  I'm violating a county ordinance.
[01:13:20.880 --> 01:13:24.880]  Keep in mind, I'm very well-read in the law and what I'm doing,
[01:13:24.880 --> 01:13:29.880]  and make sure I'm not breaking any laws whatsoever.
[01:13:29.880 --> 01:13:32.880]  And I asked him, is that a new county ordinance?
[01:13:32.880 --> 01:13:36.880]  He said, no, it's been on the books for 18 years.
[01:13:36.880 --> 01:13:42.880]  I said, well, sir, the ordinance you're referring to addresses commercial soliciting
[01:13:42.880 --> 01:13:47.880]  at the Port Lauderdale Airport and a couple other specific locations.
[01:13:47.880 --> 01:13:50.880]  It does not apply to this.
[01:13:50.880 --> 01:13:53.880]  Of course, he argued, and I just stood my ground,
[01:13:53.880 --> 01:13:56.880]  and I immediately asked to see his supervisor.
[01:13:56.880 --> 01:13:59.880]  Call your supervisor and get him out here.
[01:13:59.880 --> 01:14:02.880]  He refused.
[01:14:02.880 --> 01:14:09.880]  I ended up asking or demanding three or four other times for him to call the supervisor.
[01:14:09.880 --> 01:14:21.880]  But ended up, now, he is a sheriff from the town a couple blocks up the street
[01:14:21.880 --> 01:14:23.880]  is Weston, Florida.
[01:14:23.880 --> 01:14:25.880]  Weston does not have a police department.
[01:14:25.880 --> 01:14:33.880]  They contract the county sheriff to take care of their town,
[01:14:33.880 --> 01:14:40.880]  much like some of the other cities do in Florida.
[01:14:40.880 --> 01:14:42.880]  Another deputy showed up.
[01:14:42.880 --> 01:14:44.880]  I told him the situation.
[01:14:44.880 --> 01:14:47.880]  I told this man to call the supervisor.
[01:14:47.880 --> 01:14:48.880]  He refused.
[01:14:48.880 --> 01:14:51.880]  I said, call his supervisor and get him out here now.
[01:14:51.880 --> 01:14:56.880]  He got on the phone, did that, and said,
[01:14:56.880 --> 01:15:01.880]  the sergeant said he'd talk to you down at the substation in Weston.
[01:15:01.880 --> 01:15:03.880]  I said, no, sir.
[01:15:03.880 --> 01:15:07.880]  I need to speak with him here and now to put this to an end,
[01:15:07.880 --> 01:15:10.880]  before it goes any farther.
[01:15:10.880 --> 01:15:11.880]  He refused.
[01:15:11.880 --> 01:15:13.880]  Another deputy showed up.
[01:15:13.880 --> 01:15:20.880]  He's the one that ended up transporting me to the Weston substation,
[01:15:20.880 --> 01:15:24.880]  at which time I talked to the sergeant.
[01:15:24.880 --> 01:15:28.880]  By the time we got there, the charge changed from a county ordinance
[01:15:28.880 --> 01:15:31.880]  to a state ordinance, which I've been charged with before,
[01:15:31.880 --> 01:15:36.880]  which was ruled unconstitutional in the federal court in 2003
[01:15:36.880 --> 01:15:39.880]  and is still on the state books.
[01:15:39.880 --> 01:15:43.880]  They did not change the language of the statute.
[01:15:43.880 --> 01:15:47.880]  Well, the problem for the officer in this case then is this.
[01:15:47.880 --> 01:15:51.880]  There's already case law on the books that says when that's been done
[01:15:51.880 --> 01:15:54.880]  and they attempt to enforce it anyway,
[01:15:54.880 --> 01:15:58.880]  they have no immunity for the harm they cause under that
[01:15:58.880 --> 01:16:03.880]  because they cannot use as a defense the enforcement of any law
[01:16:03.880 --> 01:16:08.880]  that has already been ruled unconstitutional.
[01:16:08.880 --> 01:16:12.880]  Well, they like to use operating in good faith.
[01:16:12.880 --> 01:16:14.880]  There is no good faith.
[01:16:14.880 --> 01:16:21.880]  If that has been done, then the state is obligated to fix it.
[01:16:21.880 --> 01:16:26.880]  Their policy of good faith is irrelevant.
[01:16:26.880 --> 01:16:30.880]  It's what they attempt to call qualified immunity.
[01:16:30.880 --> 01:16:42.880]  They cannot claim qualified immunity by engaging in an unconstitutional act.
[01:16:42.880 --> 01:16:44.880]  So hang on just a second, Mark.
[01:16:44.880 --> 01:16:47.880]  We'll pick this up on the other side, okay?
[01:16:47.880 --> 01:16:48.880]  All right, folks.
[01:16:48.880 --> 01:16:53.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:53.880 --> 01:16:54.880]  Y'all hang on.
[01:16:54.880 --> 01:17:01.880]  We will be right back.
[01:17:01.880 --> 01:17:02.880]  At Capital Coin and Bullion,
[01:17:02.880 --> 01:17:04.880]  our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:17:04.880 --> 01:17:06.880]  by delivering excellent customer service
[01:17:06.880 --> 01:17:09.880]  and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.880 --> 01:17:11.880]  We provide a wide assortment of our favorite products
[01:17:11.880 --> 01:17:14.880]  featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.880 --> 01:17:16.880]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting
[01:17:16.880 --> 01:17:18.880]  as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:18.880 --> 01:17:20.880]  We believe in educating our customers with resources
[01:17:20.880 --> 01:17:23.880]  from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:23.880 --> 01:17:26.880]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:26.880 --> 01:17:29.880]  In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products
[01:17:29.880 --> 01:17:31.880]  such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polenburks.
[01:17:31.880 --> 01:17:34.880]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House storable foods,
[01:17:34.880 --> 01:17:38.880]  Berkey Water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:38.880 --> 01:17:42.880]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:42.880 --> 01:17:45.880]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:45.880 --> 01:17:48.880]  We're located at 7304 Burnet Road, Suite A,
[01:17:48.880 --> 01:17:50.880]  about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:50.880 --> 01:17:53.880]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:53.880 --> 01:17:59.880]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:17:59.880 --> 01:18:03.880]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved,
[01:18:03.880 --> 01:18:05.880]  except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:05.880 --> 01:18:08.880]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves,
[01:18:08.880 --> 01:18:10.880]  and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:10.880 --> 01:18:13.880]  Our primary defense against aging and disease
[01:18:13.880 --> 01:18:17.880]  in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.880 --> 01:18:20.880]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated,
[01:18:20.880 --> 01:18:22.880]  adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:22.880 --> 01:18:25.880]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.880 --> 01:18:29.880]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[01:18:29.880 --> 01:18:31.880]  most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.880 --> 01:18:34.880]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much,
[01:18:34.880 --> 01:18:39.880]  we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:39.880 --> 01:18:44.880]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve
[01:18:44.880 --> 01:18:47.880]  as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.880 --> 01:18:51.880]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:51.880 --> 01:18:54.880]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:18:54.880 --> 01:18:58.880]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:58.880 --> 01:19:00.880]  Order now.
[01:19:00.880 --> 01:19:10.880]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:10.880 --> 01:19:34.880]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:40.880 --> 01:19:45.880]  You put the fear in my pocket, took the money from my ass
[01:19:45.880 --> 01:19:51.880]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:19:53.880 --> 01:19:59.880]  Alright folks, we are back and we are talking to Mark in Florida
[01:19:59.880 --> 01:20:02.880]  Alright Mark, please continue
[01:20:02.880 --> 01:20:06.880]  Alright, you said there was case law on that, do you happen to know that?
[01:20:06.880 --> 01:20:12.880]  One of them is the one Randy quotes all the time on his show
[01:20:12.880 --> 01:20:18.880]  The one saying that if a public official does this and he'd be not insane
[01:20:18.880 --> 01:20:22.880]  That he cannot be heard to say he knew not what he did
[01:20:22.880 --> 01:20:27.880]  I forget what it is, I do have the case but I can't remember what the name of it is
[01:20:27.880 --> 01:20:31.880]  I want to say the name of the guy starts with a B
[01:20:31.880 --> 01:20:38.880]  Alright, okay, now from there like I said they took me to the substation in Weston
[01:20:38.880 --> 01:20:42.880]  Keep in mind I was in Sunrise, Florida
[01:20:42.880 --> 01:20:52.880]  Now, and the sheriff's department, whatever, Broward County Sheriff's Department
[01:20:52.880 --> 01:20:55.880]  City of Weston on their cars
[01:20:55.880 --> 01:21:01.880]  They are contracted to provide security for the City of Weston
[01:21:01.880 --> 01:21:07.880]  And I believe either you or Randy mentioned and I don't remember which
[01:21:07.880 --> 01:21:16.880]  That there was case law on, for instance, when a cop is working at the grocery store or the mall
[01:21:16.880 --> 01:21:21.880]  Doing security, that there was case law on that
[01:21:21.880 --> 01:21:28.880]  That he is not a law enforcement officer at that point, he is a security guard
[01:21:28.880 --> 01:21:32.880]  No, that's actually not true, the case law says exactly the opposite
[01:21:32.880 --> 01:21:37.880]  As a peace officer he is on duty 24-7
[01:21:37.880 --> 01:21:40.880]  Okay, okay
[01:21:40.880 --> 01:21:45.880]  Even if he is moonlighting, he can still act
[01:21:45.880 --> 01:21:53.880]  Now he may not be acting entirely under his official capacity as a police officer simply to throw people out of the bar
[01:21:53.880 --> 01:22:02.880]  But if he witnesses a crime in that bar, he absolutely has the authority to invoke his police power and do the job
[01:22:02.880 --> 01:22:09.880]  Okay, now once they got me to the substation, I finally got to talk to the sergeant
[01:22:09.880 --> 01:22:17.880]  And by that point, I asked him, I said, what am I under arrest for?
[01:22:17.880 --> 01:22:24.880]  Because when they put me in the car, they told me the county ordinance wouldn't tell me which one
[01:22:24.880 --> 01:22:27.880]  Soliciting without a permit, you know
[01:22:27.880 --> 01:22:35.880]  So I got to jail and all that changed to the state statute obstructing traffic
[01:22:35.880 --> 01:22:38.880]  Or soliciting without a permit
[01:22:38.880 --> 01:22:47.880]  They actually have both of them written up between the ticket and the affidavit
[01:22:47.880 --> 01:22:54.880]  But I informed the sergeant, I said that was ruled unconstitutional, Bischoff v. Florida in 2003
[01:22:54.880 --> 01:23:02.880]  On January 2nd by Judge Antoine II, Federal Court, Orlando Division
[01:23:02.880 --> 01:23:07.880]  I said, doesn't matter, it's still in the books
[01:23:07.880 --> 01:23:09.880]  So they transport
[01:23:09.880 --> 01:23:14.880]  Well, you have the opportunity to show them that it does matter
[01:23:14.880 --> 01:23:18.880]  It matters to me
[01:23:18.880 --> 01:23:24.880]  That's what a couple of my other charges are on too, both civil and criminal
[01:23:24.880 --> 01:23:31.880]  And so far they've just ignored that point, at least on the civil charges
[01:23:31.880 --> 01:23:37.880]  After that, they transported me to the Broward County Jail
[01:23:37.880 --> 01:23:45.880]  Now they took me inside the jail while the deputy was standing in line to check in my property
[01:23:45.880 --> 01:23:49.880]  So I never got the property receipt
[01:23:49.880 --> 01:23:53.880]  Matter of fact, when I got out of jail the next day, I still hadn't got it
[01:23:53.880 --> 01:23:59.880]  And I brought that point up to several people
[01:23:59.880 --> 01:24:04.880]  After a couple hours, you know, they call you up to the desk, tell you what you're charged with
[01:24:04.880 --> 01:24:08.880]  Ask you if you want to post bail
[01:24:08.880 --> 01:24:13.880]  Now, I knew exactly how much money I went to jail with
[01:24:13.880 --> 01:24:19.880]  I had $36 and change, almost $37
[01:24:19.880 --> 01:24:25.880]  The lady at the desk said I had $21.80
[01:24:25.880 --> 01:24:28.880]  I said, well there's $15 missing
[01:24:28.880 --> 01:24:31.880]  She said I don't know nothing about that
[01:24:31.880 --> 01:24:44.880]  But on top of that, the jail, just for showing up, they take out $15 for showing up and then $7 a day
[01:24:44.880 --> 01:24:50.880]  So they wiped out the $21.80 right then and there
[01:24:50.880 --> 01:24:53.880]  Before I could use it for bail
[01:24:53.880 --> 01:25:01.880]  And they do that because I know I've been there before, you know, like walked in with $25 and bail was $25
[01:25:01.880 --> 01:25:04.880]  And I got to make bail
[01:25:04.880 --> 01:25:11.880]  Now they're taking it off the top before you can post your bail
[01:25:11.880 --> 01:25:17.880]  Well, that sounds like theft to me
[01:25:17.880 --> 01:25:18.880]  Sounds like what?
[01:25:18.880 --> 01:25:21.880]  Theft to me
[01:25:21.880 --> 01:25:27.880]  The thing about it is what they're doing, they're taking, they're penalizing you before you've been found guilty
[01:25:27.880 --> 01:25:31.880]  Bail is not meant to pay the fine
[01:25:31.880 --> 01:25:39.880]  Bail is meant to get you released in lieu of the fine until your trial comes up or a plea bargain is reached
[01:25:39.880 --> 01:25:47.880]  So if they're attempting to make you pay before you've even been convicted, then what you're dealing with is a criminal enterprise
[01:25:47.880 --> 01:25:50.880]  Well, they make you pay for being there
[01:25:50.880 --> 01:25:54.880]  Again, you haven't been convicted of anything and you're not there of your own volition
[01:25:54.880 --> 01:25:58.880]  You're there because you're compelled to be on their behalf
[01:25:58.880 --> 01:26:00.880]  I completely agree, sir
[01:26:00.880 --> 01:26:08.880]  Well, until you sue the living crap out of somebody for doing what they're doing, it's going to continue
[01:26:08.880 --> 01:26:10.880]  Right
[01:26:10.880 --> 01:26:17.880]  And what you need to do is see how many hundreds of other people that the Florida law enforcement
[01:26:17.880 --> 01:26:24.880]  has punished under a statute that's already been declared unconstitutional for 12 years
[01:26:24.880 --> 01:26:27.880]  Yep
[01:26:27.880 --> 01:26:30.880]  Thirteen
[01:26:30.880 --> 01:26:31.880]  Thirteen
[01:26:31.880 --> 01:26:32.880]  Okay
[01:26:32.880 --> 01:26:33.880]  Nice class actions
[01:26:33.880 --> 01:26:36.880]  Well, you said 2003, didn't you?
[01:26:36.880 --> 01:26:42.880]  Yeah, well, I'm sorry, I can't do math all of a sudden
[01:26:42.880 --> 01:26:45.880]  Yeah
[01:26:45.880 --> 01:26:54.880]  Okay, so given that, that's the only way you're going to make this stop
[01:26:54.880 --> 01:27:00.880]  Well, I've got that in the plans on my other cases and, you know, this is just adding to it
[01:27:00.880 --> 01:27:01.880]  Right
[01:27:01.880 --> 01:27:12.880]  But getting enough money every day to live on and trying to do paperwork to pipe this stuff is
[01:27:12.880 --> 01:27:19.880]  I've probably got about as much spare time as you do or maybe less
[01:27:19.880 --> 01:27:24.880]  Then you're in a sad state of affairs, I've got to tell you
[01:27:24.880 --> 01:27:34.880]  Well, it didn't help that this three axle motorized home, this recreational conveyance that I'm in
[01:27:34.880 --> 01:27:39.880]  broke the spindles off the third axle
[01:27:39.880 --> 01:27:45.880]  No, I can see where that would be problematic, especially if you intend for it to go anywhere
[01:27:45.880 --> 01:27:47.880]  Yeah
[01:27:47.880 --> 01:27:55.880]  Then I spent my tire money to get that fixed and now I've finally got enough saved up to buy some tires today
[01:27:55.880 --> 01:27:58.880]  But anyway, I digress
[01:27:58.880 --> 01:28:03.880]  Next day when I go before the magistrate
[01:28:03.880 --> 01:28:11.880]  Now I noticed that he says I found probable cause on the people that went up before me
[01:28:11.880 --> 01:28:16.880]  I'm not positive he said that when I walked up there he said
[01:28:16.880 --> 01:28:20.880]  Mr. Mark, would you like to end this today?
[01:28:20.880 --> 01:28:26.880]  And I said very loud and clear, no, sir
[01:28:26.880 --> 01:28:28.880]  Which shocked him, you know, he sat back in a chair
[01:28:28.880 --> 01:28:34.880]  What I should have said was, you know, what do you have in mind, you know, hear their little offer
[01:28:34.880 --> 01:28:39.880]  and then make a counter offer and explain that this case is already residue to Cotter
[01:28:39.880 --> 01:28:43.880]  You know, it's been ruled unconstitutional, etc.
[01:28:43.880 --> 01:28:50.880]  But I screwed up there and my main concern was I didn't have bail money
[01:28:50.880 --> 01:28:55.880]  I've got depots coming up on these other cases that I have to do
[01:28:55.880 --> 01:28:58.880]  and a calendar call on the 28th
[01:28:58.880 --> 01:29:02.880]  So I got a lot of work to do and I can't be in jail
[01:29:02.880 --> 01:29:10.880]  Not to mention my recreational conveyance would get towed and at that point I lost it
[01:29:10.880 --> 01:29:12.880]  I can't get it back
[01:29:12.880 --> 01:29:16.880]  I can't pay the toll bill, $50 a day storage
[01:29:16.880 --> 01:29:19.880]  I can't catch up to that
[01:29:19.880 --> 01:29:23.880]  So, you know, main thing was me get out of jail ROR
[01:29:23.880 --> 01:29:26.880]  which I successfully argued that
[01:29:26.880 --> 01:29:32.880]  and granted the ROR and the attorney standing next to me
[01:29:32.880 --> 01:29:35.880]  Of course, we're on video court
[01:29:35.880 --> 01:29:40.880]  You know, the courtroom is next door or next building
[01:29:40.880 --> 01:29:45.880]  But the public defender congratulated me
[01:29:45.880 --> 01:29:47.880]  He said, good work, counselor
[01:29:47.880 --> 01:29:50.880]  and then five or six of the guys on my way out shook my hand
[01:29:50.880 --> 01:29:53.880]  All right, Mark, well, I'm going to have to let you drop off
[01:29:53.880 --> 01:29:55.880]  I've got a break coming up and more callers to get to
[01:29:55.880 --> 01:29:56.880]  So thanks for calling in
[01:29:56.880 --> 01:29:59.880]  We'll be right back, folks
[01:29:59.880 --> 01:30:03.880]  It's summer in 2017 and it's hot
[01:30:03.880 --> 01:30:06.880]  But when you go to turn on your A.C. you find you no longer can
[01:30:06.880 --> 01:30:11.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you about the coming smart grid in just a moment
[01:30:11.880 --> 01:30:15.880]  Your search engine is watching you recording all your searches
[01:30:15.880 --> 01:30:19.880]  and creating a massive database of your personal information
[01:30:19.880 --> 01:30:22.880]  It's creepy, but it doesn't have to be that way
[01:30:22.880 --> 01:30:25.880]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine
[01:30:25.880 --> 01:30:29.880]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches
[01:30:29.880 --> 01:30:32.880]  or use tracking cookies and they're third party certified
[01:30:32.880 --> 01:30:36.880]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage
[01:30:36.880 --> 01:30:39.880]  Great search results and total privacy
[01:30:39.880 --> 01:30:42.880]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine
[01:30:42.880 --> 01:30:46.880]  You've probably heard of smart cars, but have you heard of the smart grid?
[01:30:46.880 --> 01:30:50.880]  Smart money is being used to fund smart electric meters across the country
[01:30:50.880 --> 01:30:53.880]  Chances are there's already one on the side of your house
[01:30:53.880 --> 01:30:58.880]  Smart meters allow for two-way communication between your home's electric system and the power company
[01:30:58.880 --> 01:31:03.880]  But monitoring your energy consumption today could turn into rationing tomorrow
[01:31:03.880 --> 01:31:09.880]  Already power companies are running trials where they remotely turn off people's air conditioners during peak hours
[01:31:09.880 --> 01:31:14.880]  Eventually the smart grid will monitor every time you use the toaster or run the dryer
[01:31:14.880 --> 01:31:19.880]  When you're home or when you use the guest room, it's all micromanagement and it's the future
[01:31:19.880 --> 01:31:20.880]  Unless we say no
[01:31:20.880 --> 01:31:25.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com
[01:31:30.880 --> 01:31:35.880]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11
[01:31:35.880 --> 01:31:37.880]  The government says the fire brought it down
[01:31:37.880 --> 01:31:42.880]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition
[01:31:42.880 --> 01:31:45.880]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives
[01:31:45.880 --> 01:31:48.880]  And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying
[01:31:48.880 --> 01:31:49.880]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist
[01:31:49.880 --> 01:31:50.880]  I'm a structural engineer
[01:31:50.880 --> 01:31:51.880]  I'm a New York City correction officer
[01:31:51.880 --> 01:31:52.880]  I'm an Air Force pilot
[01:31:52.880 --> 01:31:54.880]  I'm a father who lost his son
[01:31:54.880 --> 01:31:57.880]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth
[01:31:57.880 --> 01:32:00.880]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today
[01:32:00.880 --> 01:32:02.880]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements
[01:32:02.880 --> 01:32:05.880]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:05.880 --> 01:32:10.880]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their Kim trails, but good luck getting them to pay for it
[01:32:10.880 --> 01:32:14.880]  Okay, I might be kidding about the Kim trails, but I'm serious about your roof
[01:32:14.880 --> 01:32:15.880]  That's why you have insurance
[01:32:15.880 --> 01:32:20.880]  And Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense
[01:32:20.880 --> 01:32:26.880]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints
[01:32:26.880 --> 01:32:31.880]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time
[01:32:31.880 --> 01:32:38.880]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com
[01:32:38.880 --> 01:32:40.880]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off
[01:32:40.880 --> 01:32:45.880]  And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming
[01:32:45.880 --> 01:32:50.880]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking
[01:32:50.880 --> 01:32:56.880]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com
[01:32:56.880 --> 01:32:58.880]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement
[01:32:58.880 --> 01:33:01.880]  I mean, I actually be kidding about Kim trails
[01:33:03.880 --> 01:33:06.880]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network
[01:33:06.880 --> 01:33:10.880]  At logosradionetwork.com
[01:33:10.880 --> 01:33:15.880]  Who you want to chip me? Who you take me for? Free Tully
[01:33:15.880 --> 01:33:18.880]  Who you want to chip me? I'm not free Tully
[01:33:18.880 --> 01:33:19.880]  You can't chip me
[01:33:19.880 --> 01:33:20.880]  I'm a spy
[01:33:20.880 --> 01:33:23.880]  All of them chip you in the morning, chip you in the evening
[01:33:23.880 --> 01:33:25.880]  Put a chip in your body
[01:33:25.880 --> 01:33:27.880]  And then you wait, you go computer reading
[01:33:27.880 --> 01:33:30.880]  You can't hide me from nobody
[01:33:30.880 --> 01:33:33.880]  When you say chip in your mom, chip in your daddy
[01:33:33.880 --> 01:33:34.880]  Chip in your grandpa
[01:33:34.880 --> 01:33:36.880]  Alright folks, we are back
[01:33:36.880 --> 01:33:38.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio
[01:33:38.880 --> 01:33:41.880]  Right now we have JD in Texas
[01:33:41.880 --> 01:33:43.880]  JD, what do you got?
[01:33:43.880 --> 01:33:45.880]  Hey, JD, how's it going, man?
[01:33:45.880 --> 01:33:47.880]  Alright, how are you?
[01:33:47.880 --> 01:33:48.880]  Pretty good
[01:33:48.880 --> 01:33:50.880]  Hey, I've got a question now
[01:33:50.880 --> 01:33:53.880]  As you know, I'm going through the seminar material, reading the book
[01:33:53.880 --> 01:33:54.880]  I'm learning all this stuff
[01:33:54.880 --> 01:33:59.880]  And so I've got a friend of mine that I work with
[01:33:59.880 --> 01:34:01.880]  That brought something up to me
[01:34:01.880 --> 01:34:03.880]  And he don't want to do anything with it
[01:34:03.880 --> 01:34:07.880]  But I'll just kind of see if I can get some information as far as
[01:34:07.880 --> 01:34:10.880]  I know what he did wrong, let's stop
[01:34:10.880 --> 01:34:15.880]  And what he's at now just as a learning experience on my behalf
[01:34:15.880 --> 01:34:18.880]  Now, here's what the situation is
[01:34:18.880 --> 01:34:22.880]  He was, and of course he kept saying I was driving like you were doing what?
[01:34:22.880 --> 01:34:23.880]  Driving what?
[01:34:23.880 --> 01:34:25.880]  You know, anyways, I was trying to get that through his head
[01:34:25.880 --> 01:34:27.880]  I learned that much anyway
[01:34:27.880 --> 01:34:31.880]  But he was coming from the town of Giddings
[01:34:31.880 --> 01:34:34.880]  And anyways, he got stopped by DPS
[01:34:34.880 --> 01:34:39.880]  Because apparently he had a license plate light out on his truck
[01:34:39.880 --> 01:34:41.880]  I mean, on his car
[01:34:41.880 --> 01:34:44.880]  And stopped by the state trooper
[01:34:44.880 --> 01:34:47.880]  And this guy's kind of been in and out of jail
[01:34:47.880 --> 01:34:52.880]  Not anything major, just, you know, little small offenses or whatnot
[01:34:52.880 --> 01:34:55.880]  So he was afraid that he was going to go to jail
[01:34:55.880 --> 01:35:00.880]  He's got Tennessee plates because he just moved back to Texas from Tennessee
[01:35:00.880 --> 01:35:03.880]  He'd been here two, three months
[01:35:03.880 --> 01:35:05.880]  Never got the plates changed over
[01:35:05.880 --> 01:35:09.880]  Obviously never had his driver's license changed over either
[01:35:09.880 --> 01:35:12.880]  To a Texas driver's license
[01:35:12.880 --> 01:35:16.880]  And I think, I'm not 200% sure on this, but I think
[01:35:16.880 --> 01:35:21.880]  That he has his Tennessee license revoked from something or another
[01:35:21.880 --> 01:35:23.880]  I don't know for sure, but I think
[01:35:23.880 --> 01:35:28.880]  So case being is he gets stopped for that
[01:35:28.880 --> 01:35:31.880]  He offers to tell the officer
[01:35:31.880 --> 01:35:34.880]  That I don't have a Texas driver's license
[01:35:34.880 --> 01:35:38.880]  He says, I've been trying to get the state a Texas driver's license
[01:35:38.880 --> 01:35:41.880]  But it's been hard, I've been busy this, busy that
[01:35:41.880 --> 01:35:43.880]  It's kind of hard to transfer from state to state
[01:35:43.880 --> 01:35:45.880]  He kind of set a line
[01:35:45.880 --> 01:35:50.880]  The officer says, okay, well, I'm going to write you a ticket for no driver's license
[01:35:50.880 --> 01:35:52.880]  What's your address?
[01:35:52.880 --> 01:35:55.880]  Because he's got, you know, Tennessee plates
[01:35:55.880 --> 01:35:57.880]  He gives them the address where he's staying
[01:35:57.880 --> 01:36:00.880]  Which obviously is a Texas address
[01:36:00.880 --> 01:36:03.880]  He claimed that as his address
[01:36:03.880 --> 01:36:07.880]  And then, of course, the cop gets him out of the vehicle
[01:36:07.880 --> 01:36:09.880]  Asking him to step out of the car
[01:36:09.880 --> 01:36:12.880]  So he did, he complied right away
[01:36:12.880 --> 01:36:18.880]  And he was asked by the officer if he can
[01:36:18.880 --> 01:36:22.880]  The officer asked if I have permission to search the vehicle
[01:36:22.880 --> 01:36:25.880]  Because he goes, I smell something funny
[01:36:25.880 --> 01:36:29.880]  I smell marijuana or something in there
[01:36:29.880 --> 01:36:31.880]  Do you have anything in the vehicle?
[01:36:31.880 --> 01:36:34.880]  Well, he turned around and said, yes, you can search my car
[01:36:34.880 --> 01:36:37.880]  And I do have some weed, and here it is, it's right there
[01:36:37.880 --> 01:36:40.880]  He told him exactly where it is
[01:36:40.880 --> 01:36:44.880]  And so the cop, trying to play the good guy, said
[01:36:44.880 --> 01:36:47.880]  Well, if it's just a little small amount
[01:36:47.880 --> 01:36:51.880]  I'm just going to have you dumped out and just write you a ticket for paraphernalia
[01:36:51.880 --> 01:36:54.880]  Which it was just a very little trace of it left
[01:36:54.880 --> 01:36:57.880]  Apparently from what my friend told me
[01:36:57.880 --> 01:37:00.880]  And so the cop said, all right, I need to see you dispose of it
[01:37:00.880 --> 01:37:03.880]  Put it right here, dispose of it there
[01:37:03.880 --> 01:37:05.880]  And he wrote him a ticket for paraphernalia
[01:37:05.880 --> 01:37:09.880]  So I think overall he ended up with paraphernalia
[01:37:09.880 --> 01:37:12.880]  No lights on his plate
[01:37:12.880 --> 01:37:18.880]  I'm not sure if he got a citation for not having Texas plates or not
[01:37:18.880 --> 01:37:21.880]  Well, let me ask this question
[01:37:21.880 --> 01:37:24.880]  If it wasn't Texas plates
[01:37:24.880 --> 01:37:29.880]  Then he's not going to be able to ticket him for the light
[01:37:29.880 --> 01:37:32.880]  The guy doesn't live here, it's not subject to that
[01:37:32.880 --> 01:37:40.880]  But what, hopefully your friend told you this in some form or fashion
[01:37:40.880 --> 01:37:50.880]  How far away from his car was this DPS officer when he engaged his lights
[01:37:50.880 --> 01:37:53.880]  And initiated the stop?
[01:37:53.880 --> 01:37:56.880]  See he never mentioned that and I never thought to ask him that
[01:37:56.880 --> 01:38:00.880]  You need to know that because the light on your license plate
[01:38:00.880 --> 01:38:06.880]  Is only required to be visible from no more than 50 feet
[01:38:06.880 --> 01:38:08.880]  No more than 50 feet
[01:38:08.880 --> 01:38:11.880]  Correct
[01:38:11.880 --> 01:38:18.880]  It has to be visible within 50 feet or less, not more
[01:38:18.880 --> 01:38:20.880]  Which really isn't a whole lot
[01:38:20.880 --> 01:38:24.880]  No it's not and that's my point
[01:38:24.880 --> 01:38:30.880]  In order for an officer to initiate a stop for that particular offense
[01:38:30.880 --> 01:38:36.880]  The officer would have to be breaking the law himself by tailgating
[01:38:36.880 --> 01:38:43.880]  Right, right, right, okay
[01:38:43.880 --> 01:38:47.880]  Well and then here's where it kind of gets confusing with them
[01:38:47.880 --> 01:38:51.880]  Not really confusing but where I suggested, you know, hey
[01:38:51.880 --> 01:38:56.880]  You already, you know, you have Tennessee plates
[01:38:56.880 --> 01:39:01.880]  You already gave him your address as in a Texas address
[01:39:01.880 --> 01:39:04.880]  How simple would it, because I mean he doesn't care to do anything with this
[01:39:04.880 --> 01:39:06.880]  Like he just wants to get a ticket to home
[01:39:06.880 --> 01:39:10.880]  I said how simple would it have been for you to say you were visiting someone in Texas
[01:39:10.880 --> 01:39:15.880]  Because it is not against the law for someone to travel from state to state
[01:39:15.880 --> 01:39:19.880]  To have out of state license or out of state plate or anything like that
[01:39:19.880 --> 01:39:21.880]  You could have said I'm visiting some people here
[01:39:21.880 --> 01:39:23.880]  You could have gave him the old Tennessee address
[01:39:23.880 --> 01:39:25.880]  He never would have been on the wiser
[01:39:25.880 --> 01:39:30.880]  But anyways, we were talking about it
[01:39:30.880 --> 01:39:32.880]  And I told him, I said you know what
[01:39:32.880 --> 01:39:34.880]  I found out he didn't want to do nothing anyways
[01:39:34.880 --> 01:39:38.880]  I said well it's probably good that you don't want to try to fight any of this
[01:39:38.880 --> 01:39:42.880]  Because I may be wrong
[01:39:42.880 --> 01:39:46.880]  The key is that you have already waived all of your rights
[01:39:46.880 --> 01:39:50.880]  Whenever you offered all the information to this cop
[01:39:50.880 --> 01:39:53.880]  So now for you to try to go into a court of law
[01:39:53.880 --> 01:39:56.880]  And argue that you're kind of shooting yourself in the foot
[01:39:56.880 --> 01:40:00.880]  Is that a correct assumption or am I missing that aspect?
[01:40:00.880 --> 01:40:02.880]  Absolutely, absolutely
[01:40:02.880 --> 01:40:07.880]  If he gets in that court and does the same thing he did on the side of the road with that cop
[01:40:07.880 --> 01:40:13.880]  There's nothing to stop that prosecutor from turning around and charging him with possession
[01:40:13.880 --> 01:40:15.880]  Nothing
[01:40:15.880 --> 01:40:18.880]  Doesn't matter what the cop said or did
[01:40:18.880 --> 01:40:21.880]  If he confesses to having anything at all
[01:40:21.880 --> 01:40:27.880]  Then he can get the cop to testify what quantity did you see him dump
[01:40:27.880 --> 01:40:29.880]  Well, approximately this much
[01:40:29.880 --> 01:40:31.880]  Oh good, that's enough for a possession charge
[01:40:31.880 --> 01:40:33.880]  Thank you very much
[01:40:33.880 --> 01:40:36.880]  Right
[01:40:36.880 --> 01:40:38.880]  Okay
[01:40:38.880 --> 01:40:40.880]  That's kind of what I was thinking
[01:40:40.880 --> 01:40:42.880]  I asked him how do you plan to plead
[01:40:42.880 --> 01:40:44.880]  He said I plan to plead guilty obviously
[01:40:44.880 --> 01:40:48.880]  If I thought about it for a second I said well I really don't see
[01:40:48.880 --> 01:40:53.880]  Then what would be the point of even going? Just pay the thing and go home
[01:40:53.880 --> 01:40:56.880]  Right, and that's what he wants to do
[01:40:56.880 --> 01:41:01.880]  And I'm just asking if after he had already basically waived his rights
[01:41:01.880 --> 01:41:05.880]  By allowing the search and saying this, this, there, is that there?
[01:41:05.880 --> 01:41:07.880]  He's not getting any of that back
[01:41:07.880 --> 01:41:10.880]  In fact, all it can do now is make it worse
[01:41:10.880 --> 01:41:13.880]  Right, right
[01:41:13.880 --> 01:41:15.880]  That's exactly what I thought Eddie
[01:41:15.880 --> 01:41:18.880]  So I just wanted to check in with you on that
[01:41:18.880 --> 01:41:20.880]  I told him he needed to come into the show
[01:41:20.880 --> 01:41:22.880]  He needed to come to the class with me on Sunday
[01:41:22.880 --> 01:41:24.880]  But he just, he's content to go on about his way
[01:41:24.880 --> 01:41:27.880]  But I just wanted to see as far as what I'm learning and what I'm thinking
[01:41:27.880 --> 01:41:29.880]  Make sure I'm picking correct
[01:41:29.880 --> 01:41:32.880]  But you know, you waived your rights right there
[01:41:32.880 --> 01:41:35.880]  You're pretty well done at that point
[01:41:35.880 --> 01:41:39.880]  Okay
[01:41:39.880 --> 01:41:41.880]  Alright, anything else?
[01:41:41.880 --> 01:41:42.880]  No sir, that's it
[01:41:42.880 --> 01:41:44.880]  Alright, thanks for calling in
[01:41:44.880 --> 01:41:45.880]  Alright, thank you
[01:41:45.880 --> 01:41:46.880]  Alright, bye bye
[01:41:46.880 --> 01:41:51.880]  Alright, Richard in Louisiana, you got two minutes
[01:41:51.880 --> 01:41:54.880]  Two minutes, I've been waiting for an hour and I get two minutes
[01:41:54.880 --> 01:41:58.880]  Well, until I go to break and then I can pick you back up
[01:41:58.880 --> 01:42:02.880]  Great, let's go because I want to talk about the script and the statutes
[01:42:02.880 --> 01:42:04.880]  Okay, well let's get started
[01:42:04.880 --> 01:42:08.880]  Okay, and I'm going to refer to Louisiana Revised Code
[01:42:08.880 --> 01:42:13.880]  I know that you specialize in Texas but perhaps we can apply this to my purpose
[01:42:13.880 --> 01:42:19.880]  In the future I expect to be charged with driving with our license
[01:42:19.880 --> 01:42:26.880]  So I tried to look that up with the Louisiana codes and I came across
[01:42:26.880 --> 01:42:32.880]  First of all, Louisiana Revised Statute, Section 32401, definitions
[01:42:32.880 --> 01:42:39.880]  And then I found what I believe would be the actual charge on the citation
[01:42:39.880 --> 01:42:41.880]  If a cop were to write it
[01:42:41.880 --> 01:42:45.880]  So what I was getting at for this question is
[01:42:45.880 --> 01:42:53.880]  It says drivers, this is Section 32, 32, Section 32
[01:42:53.880 --> 01:42:59.880]  I'm sorry, I'm a little nervous, Revised Statute 32, Section 32, driver must be licensed
[01:42:59.880 --> 01:43:03.880]  No person shall drive or operate any vehicle upon the highway within the state
[01:43:03.880 --> 01:43:10.880]  Unless it has been issued a license to do so as required by the laws of the state, blah blah blah
[01:43:10.880 --> 01:43:14.880]  It doesn't say anything, do you go to fight this if you wanted to?
[01:43:14.880 --> 01:43:21.880]  Do you go back to the drivers license law which has all the definitions in it to make your case?
[01:43:21.880 --> 01:43:25.880]  Well again, it depends on how you're going after the case to begin with
[01:43:25.880 --> 01:43:32.880]  If you're going after it from a non-transportation then no, you don't ever argue the merits of anything
[01:43:32.880 --> 01:43:38.880]  You go strictly with, you have no evidence I was engaged in the regulable activity of transportation
[01:43:38.880 --> 01:43:43.880]  Therefore you cannot prove I committed a violation associated with it
[01:43:43.880 --> 01:43:47.880]  That's completely different than going to merits on a specific charge
[01:43:47.880 --> 01:43:51.880]  Hang on just a second Richard, we'll pick this up on the other side
[01:43:51.880 --> 01:43:55.880]  Alright folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, we're coming back in our last segment
[01:43:55.880 --> 01:43:59.880]  Joe, hang on and I'll see if I can finish with Richard and get you before we close
[01:43:59.880 --> 01:44:03.880]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:03.880 --> 01:44:04.880]  Sorry!
[01:44:04.880 --> 01:44:07.880]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.880 --> 01:44:08.880]  What?
[01:44:08.880 --> 01:44:12.880]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity
[01:44:12.880 --> 01:44:18.880]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt and like millions of other Americans I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age
[01:44:18.880 --> 01:44:24.880]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television
[01:44:24.880 --> 01:44:29.880]  Unfortunately that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope
[01:44:29.880 --> 01:44:35.880]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports-zombie-ism recover
[01:44:35.880 --> 01:44:40.880]  And because of Brave New Books I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries
[01:44:40.880 --> 01:44:45.880]  without feeling tired or uninterested, so if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity
[01:44:45.880 --> 01:44:54.880]  then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com
[01:44:54.880 --> 01:44:57.880]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:57.880 --> 01:45:00.880]  and an overall increase in mental functioning
[01:45:00.880 --> 01:45:03.880]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.880 --> 01:45:06.880]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary
[01:45:06.880 --> 01:45:14.880]  The affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step
[01:45:14.880 --> 01:45:18.880]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[01:45:18.880 --> 01:45:22.880]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[01:45:22.880 --> 01:45:27.880]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too
[01:45:27.880 --> 01:45:33.880]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience
[01:45:33.880 --> 01:45:38.880]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.880 --> 01:45:42.880]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[01:45:42.880 --> 01:45:48.880]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:48.880 --> 01:45:51.880]  pro se tactics, and much more
[01:45:51.880 --> 01:46:03.880]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ
[01:46:03.880 --> 01:46:25.880]  Music
[01:46:25.880 --> 01:46:54.880]  Music
[01:46:54.880 --> 01:46:59.880]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio and we are talking to Richard in Louisiana
[01:46:59.880 --> 01:47:01.880]  Alright Richard, go ahead
[01:47:01.880 --> 01:47:08.880]  Okay Eddie, every time I listen to the show I come away pondering it for the next week
[01:47:08.880 --> 01:47:13.880]  thinking of questions to ask only to be stumped and befuddled when I get on the air with you
[01:47:13.880 --> 01:47:21.880]  So on this particular thing I'm going to have to regroup and readjust the questions I'm going to ask you
[01:47:21.880 --> 01:47:23.880]  but let me move on to my second topic
[01:47:23.880 --> 01:47:24.880]  Okay
[01:47:24.880 --> 01:47:29.880]  I was entertaining my cousin over the weekend for dinner and it was a good time
[01:47:29.880 --> 01:47:36.880]  and I got into this whole issue about the traveling and you don't need a license and the whole story
[01:47:36.880 --> 01:47:47.880]  So she kind of took me to course on it and it was a good exercise and I was not prepared to answer all the questions
[01:47:47.880 --> 01:47:53.880]  and things that were brought up were that she said well if you're not driving and you're not operating
[01:47:53.880 --> 01:48:00.880]  well what are you doing? Could I just substitute the term on traveling, my private conveyance?
[01:48:00.880 --> 01:48:02.880]  Sure
[01:48:02.880 --> 01:48:07.880]  You're exercising your right of liberty through locomotion
[01:48:07.880 --> 01:48:13.880]  Right, she wanted to know to drive, drive, operate rather than
[01:48:13.880 --> 01:48:20.880]  What you throw back at her is this, it depends upon the definition of the term as you are using it
[01:48:20.880 --> 01:48:25.880]  Driving as it applies under the statute is not what I'm doing
[01:48:25.880 --> 01:48:33.880]  Driving under the common definition of simply going somewhere in my car, that I might be doing
[01:48:33.880 --> 01:48:36.880]  but they are not the same meaning
[01:48:36.880 --> 01:48:41.880]  Very good, I tried to touch on that which I was met with, well I just don't believe you
[01:48:41.880 --> 01:48:46.880]  I don't care which brings me onto the script, the cross examination script
[01:48:46.880 --> 01:48:53.880]  So I tried to go to that to take the scenario and hopefully enlighten her to perhaps through the script
[01:48:53.880 --> 01:48:59.880]  she starts to get it and I said I want you to pretend like you are the juror and the case
[01:48:59.880 --> 01:49:03.880]  So I learned two things from going through this exercise
[01:49:03.880 --> 01:49:14.880]  First of all, your average jurist is going to already have the attitude that you don't think the rules apply to you
[01:49:14.880 --> 01:49:19.880]  That's going to be that right away, so you're going to have no matter how convincing you are
[01:49:19.880 --> 01:49:25.880]  you don't think the rules apply to who do you think you are, everybody else has to I think
[01:49:25.880 --> 01:49:28.880]  Right, and that's why when you're doing jury voir dire
[01:49:28.880 --> 01:49:34.880]  that's the kind of thing you need to get the juror to admit they consider in what they're doing
[01:49:34.880 --> 01:49:43.880]  Great, okay and then to the scenario on page 7 of the cross examination script
[01:49:43.880 --> 01:49:48.880]  I made up that we were in court and I was charging Officer Davis
[01:49:48.880 --> 01:49:54.880]  and it's the part where says Officer Davis, is it your understanding that the complaint in your hand
[01:49:54.880 --> 01:50:02.880]  makes a legal allegation, well I had just gone on earlier about how I wasn't going to give up any license
[01:50:02.880 --> 01:50:08.880]  or proof of insurance, so then they ask, well what citation is he going to be showing you?
[01:50:08.880 --> 01:50:15.880]  You said you weren't going to sign anything, so what is the citation Officer Davis has in his hand
[01:50:15.880 --> 01:50:19.880]  that he claims is a violation of transportation?
[01:50:19.880 --> 01:50:25.880]  It would be whatever citation he attempted to issue, whether you sign for it or not is irrelevant
[01:50:25.880 --> 01:50:31.880]  the fact of the matter is the citation is not a prerequisite to prosecution for a traffic offense
[01:50:31.880 --> 01:50:40.880]  they can do it by complaint, the citation is merely an early notice of their intent to do so
[01:50:40.880 --> 01:50:46.880]  So if things go the way that I've been imagining it on this fateful day when it does
[01:50:46.880 --> 01:50:53.880]  I'm not going to present any evidence that will incriminate me, which then I don't
[01:50:53.880 --> 01:50:58.880]  well I may have a reasonable cost to say, okay, have a nice day, which I don't
[01:50:58.880 --> 01:51:02.880]  I anticipate my window being broken, the ship being out of me
[01:51:02.880 --> 01:51:06.880]  Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa, careful with the verbiage there
[01:51:06.880 --> 01:51:08.880]  Excuse me
[01:51:11.880 --> 01:51:13.880]  Okay, continue
[01:51:13.880 --> 01:51:21.880]  I expect to have my window broken and to be pummeled by the law enforcement
[01:51:21.880 --> 01:51:26.880]  only to end up in court to defend this
[01:51:26.880 --> 01:51:31.880]  So there will be a complaint whether I sign or not?
[01:51:31.880 --> 01:51:33.880]  Correct
[01:51:33.880 --> 01:51:42.880]  Okay, is there any way in this street side stop where you do sign a complaint without admitting
[01:51:42.880 --> 01:51:46.880]  because that's what they always say, you're not admitting to anything
[01:51:46.880 --> 01:51:49.880]  you're just promising to show up in court
[01:51:49.880 --> 01:51:54.880]  Which is generally true, it's not an admission of guilt or anything else
[01:51:54.880 --> 01:51:59.880]  But would you get that file without presenting a licensed proof of insurance or registration?
[01:51:59.880 --> 01:52:05.880]  You might, they just simply may tack on those charges
[01:52:05.880 --> 01:52:13.880]  Okay, I hope the officer is understanding enough to just let me go on my way without a driver's license
[01:52:13.880 --> 01:52:15.880]  proof of insurance or registration
[01:52:15.880 --> 01:52:19.880]  Well let me put it this way, you never know what the cop is going to do
[01:52:19.880 --> 01:52:22.880]  In my experience it goes both ways
[01:52:22.880 --> 01:52:28.880]  However, in the last few years that I have been stopped by anyone anywhere
[01:52:28.880 --> 01:52:34.880]  for instance, Rockdale out just east of Austin over here
[01:52:34.880 --> 01:52:40.880]  They actually arrested me, took me to the police station
[01:52:40.880 --> 01:52:43.880]  and basically typed my information into the computer
[01:52:43.880 --> 01:52:47.880]  and then gave me a lift back to my car to get right back in it
[01:52:47.880 --> 01:52:53.880]  and go back on the road to do exactly the same thing you just took me to jail for
[01:52:53.880 --> 01:52:55.880]  Okay?
[01:52:55.880 --> 01:53:01.880]  But, but he took my seminar book
[01:53:01.880 --> 01:53:09.880]  I gave him my seminar book that I had just finished teaching the seminar here in Austin with
[01:53:09.880 --> 01:53:15.880]  and a week later I got a dismissal in the mail of every charge
[01:53:15.880 --> 01:53:19.880]  What were the charges that were brought against you?
[01:53:19.880 --> 01:53:23.880]  Failure to maintain financial responsibility, failure to produce a driver's license,
[01:53:23.880 --> 01:53:33.880]  driving while license invalid, no registration and no inspection
[01:53:33.880 --> 01:53:38.880]  So you didn't have a book tag or inspection sticker or license plate on you?
[01:53:38.880 --> 01:53:41.880]  No, my car is completely bare of those things
[01:53:41.880 --> 01:53:45.880]  It has my private plates on it and that's it
[01:53:45.880 --> 01:53:49.880]  Okay, well thank you Eddie, I'll get back next week with more, you know, conundrums
[01:53:49.880 --> 01:53:52.880]  and I hope I have some time to let the next guy get on
[01:53:52.880 --> 01:53:54.880]  All right, Richard, thanks
[01:53:54.880 --> 01:53:55.880]  Thank you, Eddie, bye bye
[01:53:55.880 --> 01:53:56.880]  Bye bye
[01:53:56.880 --> 01:53:58.880]  All right, now we got Joe in Texas
[01:53:58.880 --> 01:54:02.880]  Joe, you've got four minutes, four and a half minutes
[01:54:02.880 --> 01:54:07.880]  Okay, Eddie, I'm going to court on the 24th here at the Austin Municipal Court
[01:54:07.880 --> 01:54:13.880]  I went the other day and the prosecutor, you know, texted the people in the back
[01:54:13.880 --> 01:54:15.880]  and they tried to make a deal, this and that
[01:54:15.880 --> 01:54:19.880]  and he says, I want you to just sit down there at the defense area,
[01:54:19.880 --> 01:54:21.880]  the defense desk in front of the judge
[01:54:21.880 --> 01:54:24.880]  and he was over here and he said, you know, if you want to,
[01:54:24.880 --> 01:54:27.880]  the office is out there right now and you can go out back
[01:54:27.880 --> 01:54:29.880]  and we can make a deal, blah, blah, blah
[01:54:29.880 --> 01:54:31.880]  and I said, no, I don't want to do that
[01:54:31.880 --> 01:54:35.880]  and he said, well, then just sit there because we're going to wait for the judge
[01:54:35.880 --> 01:54:39.880]  So the judge comes out and says, Mr. Contrero, I understand your constitution
[01:54:39.880 --> 01:54:46.880]  I get a lot of these kind of motions and all that, you know, what we do through your training
[01:54:46.880 --> 01:54:50.880]  and she said, but you know, at the same time, you're not an attorney
[01:54:50.880 --> 01:54:52.880]  That's what she told me
[01:54:52.880 --> 01:54:56.880]  And you should have said, and that makes a difference in what way?
[01:54:56.880 --> 01:55:02.880]  Because right there you had the opportunity to get them admit that this is a rigged kangaroo court
[01:55:02.880 --> 01:55:08.880]  Yeah, and so the prosecutor told me the video and apparently there's no video
[01:55:08.880 --> 01:55:12.880]  The officer came out from, he was on the other side of the street
[01:55:12.880 --> 01:55:15.880]  When he came out, if we're not past the intersection,
[01:55:15.880 --> 01:55:19.880]  you can only see the video of me passing in front of the camera
[01:55:19.880 --> 01:55:24.880]  So he wasn't behind me, he didn't see me, you know, with the camera switched over
[01:55:24.880 --> 01:55:28.880]  So he was kind of hiding from the other side of the road
[01:55:28.880 --> 01:55:31.880]  Okay, and what is it that they're charging you with?
[01:55:31.880 --> 01:55:36.880]  They're switching the lanes, you know, switching the lanes right away
[01:55:36.880 --> 01:55:40.880]  You need to take a right, but I switched before I got to the stop sign
[01:55:40.880 --> 01:55:41.880]  Okay
[01:55:41.880 --> 01:55:47.880]  And so the guy said, I'm going to send you the video because I got the video already
[01:55:47.880 --> 01:55:52.880]  And it says the prosecutor will work to see how we're going to handle the case
[01:55:52.880 --> 01:55:58.880]  Or as before, he didn't even do that, and they were trying to intimidate me with a judge
[01:55:58.880 --> 01:56:03.880]  And my question was in the back of my mind, if there's a lot of people doing this,
[01:56:03.880 --> 01:56:08.880]  the court would be backed up, you know, because, you know
[01:56:08.880 --> 01:56:13.880]  And so now I'm going to go and he asked me, do you want to bench a jury or a jewelry?
[01:56:13.880 --> 01:56:16.880]  And I said, well, I want to want a jury
[01:56:16.880 --> 01:56:20.880]  The person's video doesn't show me switching, he saw me from across the street
[01:56:20.880 --> 01:56:24.880]  Is it invalid or?
[01:56:24.880 --> 01:56:29.880]  That depends on what his angle of view was, Joe, that's going to be hard to say
[01:56:29.880 --> 01:56:34.880]  You're going to have to be able, does the video show what his view of the line and the road is?
[01:56:34.880 --> 01:56:38.880]  No, no, nothing at all, he just came out from the other side of the street
[01:56:38.880 --> 01:56:42.880]  He was watching behind the tree, you see?
[01:56:42.880 --> 01:56:48.880]  It turns out when he takes off and I'm already past the intersection, I'm already driving down the road
[01:56:48.880 --> 01:56:57.880]  Okay, but the video is not required for him to testify that he saw it, you understand that, right?
[01:56:57.880 --> 01:56:59.880]  Uh huh
[01:56:59.880 --> 01:57:06.880]  So my question is, despite what the video does or does not show,
[01:57:06.880 --> 01:57:16.880]  What is the officer's line of sight from his car from that position in order to see the lanes and the lines and your car?
[01:57:16.880 --> 01:57:22.880]  What time of night was it? Was it under streetlights, etc., etc.?
[01:57:22.880 --> 01:57:26.880]  Yeah, it was in the morning and he was behind a tree, I can see him behind a tree
[01:57:26.880 --> 01:57:29.880]  And it would be difficult for him to see that
[01:57:29.880 --> 01:57:34.880]  Would he have a clear line of sight to where you allegedly made this lane change?
[01:57:34.880 --> 01:57:37.880]  No, he didn't, because the tree was in his line of sight
[01:57:37.880 --> 01:57:40.880]  There was a tree, he was behind a line of sight
[01:57:40.880 --> 01:57:46.880]  Okay, then what you can do is you can use that video to prove his location in relation to that tree
[01:57:46.880 --> 01:57:54.880]  And then prove that there's no way he could have seen what he's saying he saw because the tree was in his line of sight
[01:57:54.880 --> 01:57:56.880]  Uh huh, okay
[01:57:56.880 --> 01:57:57.880]  Okay
[01:57:57.880 --> 01:57:59.880]  Well then I'll get back with you later on
[01:57:59.880 --> 01:58:01.880]  Alright Joe, thanks for calling in
[01:58:01.880 --> 01:58:02.880]  Alright, my pleasure
[01:58:02.880 --> 01:58:03.880]  Bye
[01:58:03.880 --> 01:58:06.880]  Alright folks, this has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show
[01:58:06.880 --> 01:58:08.880]  I want to thank all the callers who called in tonight
[01:58:08.880 --> 01:58:11.880]  And all the people that are listening, however many you are and wherever you may be
[01:58:11.880 --> 01:58:13.880]  Thank you so much for everything
[01:58:13.880 --> 01:58:20.880]  Please check out the Rule of Law Radio website and the Logos Radio Network website for our new sponsor postings
[01:58:20.880 --> 01:58:24.880]  And please folks, keep us in your financial blessings and prayers
[01:58:24.880 --> 01:58:32.880]  And remember, if you can, please continue to donate to me to fund the lawsuit that we've got coming up against the city of Austin for stealing my cars
[01:58:32.880 --> 01:58:34.880]  And keeping everything on track for that
[01:58:34.880 --> 01:58:38.880]  Alright folks, y'all have a great week, good night, God bless
[01:58:38.880 --> 01:59:06.880]  Bible for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version
[01:59:06.880 --> 01:59:08.880]  To know the meaning of life
[01:59:08.880 --> 01:59:11.880]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America
[01:59:11.880 --> 01:59:16.880]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.880 --> 01:59:20.880]  Or visit us online at bfa.org
[01:59:20.880 --> 01:59:25.880]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references
[01:59:25.880 --> 01:59:29.880]  Plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible
[01:59:29.880 --> 01:59:32.880]  This is truly a Bible you can understand
[01:59:32.880 --> 01:59:40.880]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:40.880 --> 01:59:44.880]  That's 888-551-0102
[01:59:44.880 --> 01:59:49.880]  Or visit us online at bfa.org
[01:59:49.880 --> 01:59:53.880]  Looking for some truth? You found it!
[01:59:53.880 --> 02:00:03.880]  Logosradionetwork.com