[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives.
[00:21.000 --> 00:30.000]  Markets for the 17th of August, 2015, opened up with gold at $1,117.23 an ounce, silver, $15.33 an ounce,
[00:30.000 --> 00:42.000]  Texas crude, $42.50 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 258 U.S. currency.
[00:42.000 --> 00:50.000]  Today in history, Friday, August 17, 1945, as set forth in the Cairo Conference between Japan, the Soviet Union, and the United States,
[00:50.000 --> 00:58.000]  Korea was divided into North and South. The Allied victory of World War II effectively ended the empire of Japan's 35-year colonial rule of Korea.
[00:58.000 --> 01:06.000]  The United States and the Soviet Union agreed to temporarily occupy the country as a trusteeship with the zone of control along the 38th parallel.
[01:06.000 --> 01:17.000]  In recent news, back in May, the IRS reported that identity thieves were able to use the agency's Get Transcript program
[01:17.000 --> 01:26.000]  to get personal information on as many as 114,000 taxpayers. Today, the IRS revealed an additional 220,000 accounts had apparently also been hacked.
[01:26.000 --> 01:30.000]  However, the amount of stolen information is undeterminable at the moment.
[01:30.000 --> 01:35.000]  The hackers accessed the IRS Get Transcript system with information about taxpayers acquired from other sources
[01:35.000 --> 01:41.000]  and used it to correctly answer a series of security questions, giving them access to private financial data.
[01:41.000 --> 01:47.000]  The agency is assuring that taxpayers whose information may have been potentially breached will be getting letters in the mail in the coming days.
[01:47.000 --> 01:57.000]  The compromised accounts will also receive access to free credit protection and identity protection pins.
[01:57.000 --> 02:05.000]  Documents released by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden and analyzed by the New York Times and ProPublica show that over the course of several decades,
[02:05.000 --> 02:11.000]  under mounting political pressure, AT&T gave the NSA access to billions of emails that flowed through its domestic networks
[02:11.000 --> 02:18.000]  and assisted in carrying out a secret court order that allowed the wiretapping of Internet communications at the United Nations headquarters.
[02:18.000 --> 02:25.000]  These revelations are timely considering that the Electronic Frontier Foundation is suing the NSA on behalf of AT&T customers
[02:25.000 --> 02:32.000]  for what it is claiming is an illegal, unconstitutional, and ongoing dragnet surveillance of their communications and communications records.
[02:32.000 --> 02:39.000]  Electronic Frontier Foundation Executive Director Cindy Kahn told ProPublica that the Foundation will present the new information in court.
[02:39.000 --> 02:43.000]  In response to the report, AT&T spokesman Brad Burns told the Times,
[02:43.000 --> 02:51.000]  we do not voluntarily provide information to any investigating authorities other than if a person's life is in danger in times of the essence.
[02:51.000 --> 03:03.000]  This has been your Lowdown for August 17, 2013.
[03:21.000 --> 03:29.000]  Really, man, come on, six o'clock news says somebody's been shot, somebody's been abused,
[03:29.000 --> 03:35.000]  somebody blew up a building, somebody stole their car, somebody got away,
[03:35.000 --> 03:43.000]  somebody didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far.
[03:43.000 --> 03:52.000]  Brad Faffey told my Faffey back in my day slot, a man had to answer for the wicked thing he'd done,
[03:52.000 --> 03:58.000]  take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them bad boys,
[03:58.000 --> 04:06.000]  hang them high in the street for all the people to see.
[04:06.000 --> 04:14.000]  That justice is one thing you should always find, you've got to settle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line.
[04:14.000 --> 04:22.000]  When the guns were settled, we'll sing a victory tune and we'll all be back as a whole soon.
[04:22.000 --> 04:37.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing, let's get all my men before my horse says.
[04:37.000 --> 04:42.000]  We ain't got too many gangsters doing their duty.
[04:42.000 --> 04:49.000]  All right, folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show. It is August 17, 2015.
[04:49.000 --> 04:57.000]  We are continuing on through this year. In fact, we are coming up on three-quarters of the way through this year.
[04:57.000 --> 05:05.000]  Now, as you all heard me say on the show here, I need some donation support to help me get enough money together
[05:05.000 --> 05:14.000]  to facilitate a lawsuit against the Austin Police Department and the City of Austin for theft of two cars parked in front of my house.
[05:14.000 --> 05:22.000]  This is not in any way something that I'm just going to collect money for and let sit idle.
[05:22.000 --> 05:28.000]  I want to go after the city for stealing this property, but I cannot afford to do it by myself.
[05:28.000 --> 05:30.000]  This is not about me getting my cars back.
[05:30.000 --> 05:37.000]  This is about setting a case precedent that will allow any person in Texas to sue any municipality
[05:37.000 --> 05:45.000]  for taking their cars off of their property or from in front of their house simply because they're not registered with the state.
[05:45.000 --> 05:51.000]  That's the real reason my cars were taken, because they don't have state stickers on them.
[05:51.000 --> 05:59.000]  They don't have state plates on them. They were taken because of that.
[05:59.000 --> 06:02.000]  There was nothing wrong with the cars. The cars were not inoperable.
[06:02.000 --> 06:07.000]  They were not damaged in any way that would in any way affect their operation.
[06:07.000 --> 06:11.000]  There was no grounds to tag them as abandoned vehicles in the first place,
[06:11.000 --> 06:17.000]  which I'm going to make sure Officer Mueller, who is the individual who placed the stickers on my car to begin with,
[06:17.000 --> 06:21.000]  has to answer for that one on the stand.
[06:21.000 --> 06:25.000]  And he's not going to like it or she's not going to like it, whichever one it turns out to be.
[06:25.000 --> 06:36.000]  But either way, this is going to be a case that's going to allow us to get some control back over what these cities think they can do.
[06:36.000 --> 06:44.000]  Most of the time, the cities are relying on their ordinances as the lawful authority to do what they're doing.
[06:44.000 --> 06:55.000]  If you have gone to my blog site, tauoflaw.wordpress.com, and you have read the posting I put up there,
[06:55.000 --> 07:06.000]  which is a chapter out of my second book on why ordinances are not law and how ordinances are currently being fictitiously treated as law,
[07:06.000 --> 07:14.000]  you will understand what makes what they're doing completely unconstitutional and illegal.
[07:14.000 --> 07:22.000]  Every home-ruled city has a charter that specifically states they may not do anything in that charter
[07:22.000 --> 07:29.000]  or enact any ordinance under that charter that violates any provision of the Texas Constitution.
[07:29.000 --> 07:37.000]  Well, like I said before, the only legislative body that exists under constitutional authority in Texas
[07:37.000 --> 07:44.000]  are the two houses of the legislature combined into the legislature of the state of Texas.
[07:44.000 --> 07:53.000]  No one else is given any legislative power whatsoever to create binding public law upon the people.
[07:53.000 --> 07:59.000]  Nobody. The Supreme Court of Texas has ruled they cannot delegate that power
[07:59.000 --> 08:05.000]  as there is no delegation clause in the Constitution for them to do so.
[08:05.000 --> 08:11.000]  Nowhere in Article 11, which allows the creation of municipalities,
[08:11.000 --> 08:16.000]  is there any authority for an ordinance to be treated as law.
[08:16.000 --> 08:24.000]  Ordinance and ordinances, plural, have appeared in the Texas Constitution exactly one time each,
[08:24.000 --> 08:35.000]  both in Article 11, Section 5, both of them in relation to the corporate business of electing or paying.
[08:35.000 --> 08:40.000]  It's not about creating law, binding the public to do anything.
[08:40.000 --> 08:53.000]  Now, the other aspect of that is this. The charter and the state constitution both authorize the city to engage in self-governance.
[08:53.000 --> 08:56.000]  Now, this is what their attorneys are going to argue.
[08:56.000 --> 09:03.000]  The city of Austin or the city of Dallas or the city of Fort Worth or the city of Houston has the right of self-governance.
[09:03.000 --> 09:07.000]  We can do what we want to govern ourselves. Well, guess what?
[09:07.000 --> 09:19.000]  They're absolutely right. But please tell me where the term self is defined to encompass anything other than you and what is rightfully yours.
[09:19.000 --> 09:25.000]  Self-governance does not give you or me the power to govern our neighbor.
[09:25.000 --> 09:33.000]  Therefore, self-governance cannot give a municipality or a county the power to do it either.
[09:33.000 --> 09:37.000]  Because then it is not self-governance.
[09:37.000 --> 09:48.000]  It is governance without consent of the people in violation of the Texas Constitution. That's what it is.
[09:48.000 --> 09:52.000]  So by their own definition, they're already hosed.
[09:52.000 --> 10:00.000]  They can't claim self-governance and turn around and prove that I am somebody under their authority to be governed,
[10:00.000 --> 10:05.000]  that I am a part of them for self to apply.
[10:05.000 --> 10:07.000]  Neither is my property.
[10:07.000 --> 10:20.000]  Just because me and my property is within the physical geographical boundaries of the city does not make me a part of the city subject to their governance.
[10:20.000 --> 10:28.000]  That is an illusion they have created. It is not a legal fact. It can't be a legal fact.
[10:28.000 --> 10:35.000]  Or the Constitution and the laws that are promulgated under it properly mean nothing.
[10:35.000 --> 10:45.000]  And we have a government that has thrown it all out the window and uses nothing but lethal force to do what it pleases,
[10:45.000 --> 10:49.000]  in which case this is no longer America.
[10:49.000 --> 10:58.000]  This is some banana republic where might makes right and the government is the master while the people are the slaves.
[10:58.000 --> 11:10.000]  The very thing that we have claimed to rail and fight against since the creation of the American sovereign republics from day one.
[11:10.000 --> 11:13.000]  Where is your common sense, people?
[11:13.000 --> 11:16.000]  Where is your anger?
[11:16.000 --> 11:20.000]  Where is your desire to be free?
[11:20.000 --> 11:29.000]  To be left alone to live your life without the granny state and the nanny state hovering over you and telling you you can't do that.
[11:29.000 --> 11:34.000]  That's not the way. We don't want it. We don't like it. Blah, blah, blah.
[11:34.000 --> 11:39.000]  None of it is within their power in the first place.
[11:39.000 --> 11:44.000]  And we need to stop letting them believe that it is.
[11:44.000 --> 11:52.000]  The only way we can do that is to stand together and unanimously say no.
[11:52.000 --> 11:56.000]  Never again. No.
[11:56.000 --> 12:09.000]  If that takes the entire population of Texas to gather on the grounds of the Capitol, then that's what we should be doing.
[12:09.000 --> 12:12.000]  Why isn't that what we're doing?
[12:12.000 --> 12:30.000]  Why do we leave these lecherous thieves up there on Capitol Hill here in Texas to do whatever they want and act like their little silver spoons and gilded walled offices allow them to do it?
[12:30.000 --> 12:34.000]  Oh, I want to do this. This is my pet project while I'm in office.
[12:34.000 --> 12:37.000]  I'm going to push this through come hell or high water.
[12:37.000 --> 12:40.000]  This is what I'm going to do.
[12:40.000 --> 12:45.000]  Nobody bothers to ask, do you have any real authority to do it?
[12:45.000 --> 12:53.000]  What right do you have to force your agenda down the throat of the people of Texas?
[12:53.000 --> 12:56.000]  Where did you get that authority?
[12:56.000 --> 13:01.000]  How can your pet peeve suddenly become my pet responsibility?
[13:01.000 --> 13:06.000]  But, folks, that is what's happening.
[13:06.000 --> 13:12.000]  And I will tell you exactly who is responsible for it.
[13:12.000 --> 13:16.000]  Everyone with a bar card.
[13:16.000 --> 13:18.000]  Everyone with a bar card.
[13:18.000 --> 13:20.000]  I don't care what their intentions are.
[13:20.000 --> 13:23.000]  I don't care what their practice is.
[13:23.000 --> 13:26.000]  The moment, it's just like the good cop, bad cop thing.
[13:26.000 --> 13:36.000]  There can be no good cop when that cop joins the police force knowing full well he is there to enforce bad policy.
[13:36.000 --> 13:38.000]  Period.
[13:38.000 --> 13:46.000]  When a cop puts on a badge and says, I swear to defend the laws of this state, no matter how immoral, no matter how unconstitutional,
[13:46.000 --> 13:54.000]  no matter how unethical, and no matter who I have to kill in the people to get it done, I swear I will make it happen.
[13:54.000 --> 14:00.000]  There are no good cops.
[14:00.000 --> 14:06.000]  Because that is the oath they take in order to be a cop in the first place.
[14:06.000 --> 14:10.000]  You can't claim to be a good cop and that be the case.
[14:10.000 --> 14:17.000]  Therefore, you cannot claim to be a good politician when that's exactly what you're going to do when you get up there to enact these laws.
[14:17.000 --> 14:25.000]  You cannot be a good cop, okay, and the ability to charge outrageous money for doing absolutely nothing,
[14:25.000 --> 14:34.000]  so some people can at least feel like they attempted to receive their due process and proper justice in a rigged system
[14:34.000 --> 14:43.000]  that is made to do nothing more than enrich those with the bar cards.
[14:43.000 --> 14:50.000]  There are no good attorneys, provided, of course, we're not talking about the ones already under headstones.
[14:50.000 --> 14:53.000]  For exactly the same reason, there are no good cops.
[14:53.000 --> 14:55.000]  It doesn't matter what their intentions are either.
[14:55.000 --> 14:57.000]  It can't.
[14:57.000 --> 15:04.000]  As long as you're willing to be there and not do what needs to be done to stop the bad things that they do
[15:04.000 --> 15:12.000]  and to rail against them and unite together within the ranks to make it stop, you can't call yourself a good anything.
[15:12.000 --> 15:26.000]  I live the way I do, so I'm as free to be as I need to be without fear that they have something they can use to hold me down.
[15:26.000 --> 15:30.000]  I don't own property anymore for that reason.
[15:30.000 --> 15:34.000]  I've separated myself from my family for that reason.
[15:34.000 --> 15:38.000]  I've lost marriages for that reason.
[15:38.000 --> 15:42.000]  I didn't want to give any of that up.
[15:42.000 --> 15:47.000]  In my heart of hearts, I loathe the very thought of having to give it up.
[15:47.000 --> 15:50.000]  But who else was going to?
[15:50.000 --> 15:52.000]  Who else out there would?
[15:52.000 --> 15:54.000]  I had that discussion today.
[15:54.000 --> 15:59.000]  When you're talking about taking away somebody's ability to earn the type of living they're accustomed to,
[15:59.000 --> 16:06.000]  that they've got children to feed, wife to support, house payments, car payments, and all this other stuff,
[16:06.000 --> 16:19.000]  why are they going to risk losing what they have for the benefit of anyone that isn't absolutely blood-kinned to them?
[16:19.000 --> 16:23.000]  Why would they sacrifice anything for a stranger?
[16:23.000 --> 16:27.000]  Even though that's what we, if a true Christian, that's what we're commanded to do.
[16:27.000 --> 16:33.000]  We're commanded to love our neighbor and the strangers just as we would love ourselves.
[16:33.000 --> 16:36.000]  And we do unto others the way we would have them do unto us.
[16:36.000 --> 16:38.000]  But we're not doing that anymore.
[16:38.000 --> 16:46.000]  Because if we were, what we would be doing would be standing up for those people that don't have the ability to stand up for themselves
[16:46.000 --> 16:49.000]  and spitting in the eye of those that control this system,
[16:49.000 --> 16:55.000]  holding them down, taking them off of their dais, and hanging them in the nearest tree.
[16:55.000 --> 17:00.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back, so y'all hang in there.
[17:00.000 --> 17:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.000 --> 17:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.000 --> 17:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.000 --> 17:25.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.000 --> 17:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:31.000 --> 17:39.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.000 --> 17:47.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:47.000 --> 17:51.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.000 --> 17:58.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:58.000 --> 18:00.000]  Order now.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:14.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too.
[18:14.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:24.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[18:24.000 --> 18:26.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:26.000 --> 18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:47.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 18:52.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:52.000 --> 19:01.000]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-f at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:11.000 --> 19:34.000]  Look what we've got in the eyes of a Christian. I wonder what I don't have answered.
[19:34.000 --> 19:48.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:48.000 --> 19:51.000]  We've got a couple of callers up on the board here.
[19:51.000 --> 19:54.000]  We have what appears to be Jeff in Mississippi.
[19:54.000 --> 20:00.000]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[20:00.000 --> 20:03.000]  Give us a call, get in line, let's start talking.
[20:03.000 --> 20:06.000]  All right, Jeff, what can we do for you?
[20:06.000 --> 20:09.000]  Hey, Eddie, thanks for having me on the show.
[20:09.000 --> 20:14.000]  I want to go after my college, and I want to know if I should sue them.
[20:14.000 --> 20:16.000]  Are they a government entity?
[20:16.000 --> 20:19.000]  Are they state-funded?
[20:19.000 --> 20:21.000]  Yes, it's a state university.
[20:21.000 --> 20:25.000]  Yeah, then most likely they are considered a state entity.
[20:25.000 --> 20:31.000]  Would I want to go Title 42, 1983, or just civil court?
[20:31.000 --> 20:33.000]  Title 42.
[20:33.000 --> 20:36.000]  The only way you could go civil court and expect to get anything out of it is
[20:36.000 --> 20:43.000]  if you can show the university acted in a capacity not authorized by any law or Constitution.
[20:43.000 --> 20:47.000]  They make that intentionally harder to do than it should be.
[20:47.000 --> 20:52.000]  That's in order to protect themselves, not the university, but the state as a whole,
[20:52.000 --> 20:56.000]  and any political subdivision that is part of them.
[20:56.000 --> 21:02.000]  They will go through all kinds of hoops and twisted logic to make it where it's almost impossible
[21:02.000 --> 21:07.000]  at the state level to get after these, any form of governmental entity.
[21:07.000 --> 21:11.000]  It's not impossible, but they make it appear to be virtually impossible.
[21:11.000 --> 21:16.000]  Title 42 takes away a lot of that immunity.
[21:16.000 --> 21:20.000]  Oh, good.
[21:20.000 --> 21:25.000]  Now, I can tell you, do you participate in Facebook at all?
[21:25.000 --> 21:27.000]  No, actually I don't.
[21:27.000 --> 21:31.000]  Okay, you might consider doing it for a little while for this reason.
[21:31.000 --> 21:38.000]  One of the folks that is one of my friends on Facebook is named Jerry Howe, H-O-W-E.
[21:38.000 --> 21:44.000]  He is a self-described expert on filing Title 42 lawsuits.
[21:44.000 --> 21:49.000]  And I say self-described simply because he's not an attorney, he's like me.
[21:49.000 --> 21:55.000]  I've spent my time learning the Texas statutes and the ins and outs of the Texas Just Us system,
[21:55.000 --> 22:03.000]  and he has spent his time becoming a subject matter expert on Title 42 lawsuits.
[22:03.000 --> 22:04.000]  All right.
[22:04.000 --> 22:12.000]  And he's got a huge amount of material, including 27 hours of audio that you can study
[22:12.000 --> 22:17.000]  and learn from in order to ensure that you're doing this suit properly.
[22:17.000 --> 22:19.000]  Okay.
[22:19.000 --> 22:20.000]  Okay.
[22:20.000 --> 22:21.000]  Well, I'm on it then.
[22:21.000 --> 22:22.000]  I'm going to get him.
[22:22.000 --> 22:23.000]  I'm going to get on that.
[22:23.000 --> 22:24.000]  Okay.
[22:24.000 --> 22:28.000]  Yeah, just make sure you let him know that I referred you to him on Facebook.
[22:28.000 --> 22:35.000]  You're a caller to my show, and you need to know what the requirements to file a Title 42 lawsuit are.
[22:35.000 --> 22:44.000]  At the same time, you can also send a request to me, and that is under TAO Law, T-A-O-space-L-A-U-W.
[22:44.000 --> 22:45.000]  Got it.
[22:45.000 --> 22:46.000]  Okay.
[22:46.000 --> 22:52.000]  And I prefer whenever you're on Facebook that you use that name, not mine.
[22:52.000 --> 22:53.000]  Oh, TAO.
[22:53.000 --> 22:55.000]  Right.
[22:55.000 --> 22:56.000]  Oh, okay.
[22:56.000 --> 23:00.000]  You mean when I'm speaking to someone else that referred of the reference.
[23:00.000 --> 23:01.000]  No, no, no.
[23:01.000 --> 23:06.000]  Well, whenever you're talking to me on Facebook at all, don't use my regular name.
[23:06.000 --> 23:09.000]  Use my Facebook name.
[23:09.000 --> 23:11.000]  Got it.
[23:11.000 --> 23:13.000]  Okay.
[23:13.000 --> 23:14.000]  All right.
[23:14.000 --> 23:15.000]  Well, that was all I needed to know.
[23:15.000 --> 23:16.000]  Okay.
[23:16.000 --> 23:17.000]  I'm going to get on it with Lickety Split.
[23:17.000 --> 23:18.000]  I sure appreciate it.
[23:18.000 --> 23:19.000]  Yes, sir.
[23:19.000 --> 23:20.000]  No problem.
[23:20.000 --> 23:21.000]  Thank you.
[23:21.000 --> 23:22.000]  You're very welcome, Jeff.
[23:22.000 --> 23:23.000]  Good luck.
[23:23.000 --> 23:24.000]  All right.
[23:24.000 --> 23:27.000]  Now we're going to go to Angela Greer.
[23:27.000 --> 23:31.000]  Angela, what can we do for you?
[23:31.000 --> 23:32.000]  Hi.
[23:32.000 --> 23:34.000]  Hi.
[23:34.000 --> 23:43.000]  I'm going to court tomorrow for a motion to amend conditions of community supervision for spelling ADWR.
[23:43.000 --> 23:44.000]  Okay.
[23:44.000 --> 23:48.000]  I've done some research, and I just wanted to get your input.
[23:48.000 --> 23:53.000]  The motion to amend is to remove the interlock condition.
[23:53.000 --> 23:55.000]  My case is not alcohol-related.
[23:55.000 --> 23:58.000]  And so this is what I have.
[23:58.000 --> 24:00.000]  Wait, wait, wait.
[24:00.000 --> 24:03.000]  It's not alcohol-related.
[24:03.000 --> 24:04.000]  Okay.
[24:04.000 --> 24:08.000]  So it's a DWI under the influence, but not of alcohol.
[24:08.000 --> 24:09.000]  Right.
[24:09.000 --> 24:10.000]  Okay.
[24:10.000 --> 24:14.000]  An alcoholizer machine can't detect.
[24:14.000 --> 24:15.000]  Right.
[24:15.000 --> 24:16.000]  Okay.
[24:16.000 --> 24:17.000]  All right.
[24:17.000 --> 24:24.000]  And while I was on bond, the interlock was a requirement, and my court appointed filed
[24:24.000 --> 24:31.000]  a motion to amend conditions of bond, and it was granted and marked irrelevant, and
[24:31.000 --> 24:34.000]  the state agreed.
[24:34.000 --> 24:39.000]  And I've looked at the law, and the law states that the judge may not require the interlock
[24:39.000 --> 24:43.000]  if it's not in the best interest of justice.
[24:43.000 --> 24:52.000]  And so I feel like that's already been determined, and that it wouldn't be just in this case.
[24:52.000 --> 24:56.000]  So I would assume that it would set precedent on this issue.
[24:56.000 --> 24:57.000]  Well, no.
[24:57.000 --> 25:02.000]  Obviously, if there's something in statute that says the judge can't order an interlock,
[25:02.000 --> 25:08.000]  they're forbidden to do it by statute in the first place.
[25:08.000 --> 25:18.000]  What I've read about driving while intoxicated is the definition in the code is that it's
[25:18.000 --> 25:26.000]  loss of function of your body, and it doesn't necessarily say for alcohol, but when it talks
[25:26.000 --> 25:32.000]  about the interlock, it's in reference to the actual DWI, which is driving while intoxicated.
[25:32.000 --> 25:36.000]  It doesn't necessarily speak of alcohol-related or not.
[25:36.000 --> 25:37.000]  Right.
[25:37.000 --> 25:44.000]  The things are that the interlock cannot detect any level of intoxication for the substance
[25:44.000 --> 25:47.000]  that was alleged to have caused the intoxication.
[25:47.000 --> 25:51.000]  Therefore, the interlock is in A, non-applicable.
[25:51.000 --> 25:56.000]  It can't be used to resolve any problem whatsoever.
[25:56.000 --> 26:05.000]  All it's doing is adding an unnecessary cost to the defendant, and that's unjust.
[26:05.000 --> 26:08.000]  That's the grounds for the argument.
[26:08.000 --> 26:10.000]  Okay.
[26:10.000 --> 26:18.000]  But precedent wouldn't be for this since they did amend the bond conditions on the same
[26:18.000 --> 26:21.000]  issue, and nothing has changed.
[26:21.000 --> 26:26.000]  Well, you're not going to be the first one that's requested this, I guarantee you.
[26:26.000 --> 26:34.000]  And precedent is when you argue a fact that has never been argued before, and a court
[26:34.000 --> 26:40.000]  rules in your favor or against you and sets precedent.
[26:40.000 --> 26:41.000]  Oh, okay.
[26:41.000 --> 26:42.000]  All right.
[26:42.000 --> 26:48.000]  Precedent is established by either overturning prior decisions and establishing a new legal
[26:48.000 --> 26:56.000]  threshold, or their determinations of law upon new first blush issues.
[26:56.000 --> 27:01.000]  Oh, okay.
[27:01.000 --> 27:06.000]  So, I guess theory, decisis wouldn't have any role in that either.
[27:06.000 --> 27:07.000]  Starry decisis.
[27:07.000 --> 27:10.000]  Starry decisis, that's what it is.
[27:10.000 --> 27:12.000]  That's what you're talking about.
[27:12.000 --> 27:13.000]  Precedent, okay.
[27:13.000 --> 27:15.000]  So, it's pretty much the same thing.
[27:15.000 --> 27:16.000]  Yeah.
[27:16.000 --> 27:20.000]  Starry decisis is controlling precedent.
[27:20.000 --> 27:21.000]  Okay.
[27:21.000 --> 27:24.000]  Okay.
[27:24.000 --> 27:30.000]  And if they were, I'm not really expecting them to grant, but if they were to deny my
[27:30.000 --> 27:37.000]  motion, so I would argue that it's more an applicable and unnecessary cost.
[27:37.000 --> 27:38.000]  Correct.
[27:38.000 --> 27:39.000]  How would I go about the argument?
[27:39.000 --> 27:43.000]  Well, I thought you said you had an attorney.
[27:43.000 --> 27:44.000]  No, no, no.
[27:44.000 --> 27:47.000]  I had a court-appointed attorney while I was on bond.
[27:47.000 --> 27:52.000]  But you said you already had an attorney who already filed a motion saying that it was
[27:52.000 --> 27:57.000]  in A, that the court already agreed with it.
[27:57.000 --> 27:59.000]  Yes, that was while on bond.
[27:59.000 --> 28:01.000]  I've already signed for probation.
[28:01.000 --> 28:02.000]  I'm on probation.
[28:02.000 --> 28:04.000]  I don't have a court-appointed attorney any longer.
[28:04.000 --> 28:10.000]  Okay, then all you should have to do is take in the prior court order and show that the
[28:10.000 --> 28:19.000]  conviction or the probation is not based upon alcohol, and therefore an interlock device
[28:19.000 --> 28:21.000]  is not applicable here.
[28:21.000 --> 28:29.000]  It has no effect whatsoever on the charge or the basis of the probation.
[28:29.000 --> 28:30.000]  Okay.
[28:30.000 --> 28:31.000]  Okay.
[28:31.000 --> 28:37.000]  It's an abusive cost to the defense.
[28:37.000 --> 28:38.000]  Okay.
[28:38.000 --> 28:44.000]  So the prior decision that was made on bond should be enforceable then, is that correct?
[28:44.000 --> 28:51.000]  You can use that to show that the prior court agreed that this interlock was not necessary
[28:51.000 --> 28:53.000]  even while on bond.
[28:53.000 --> 29:00.000]  Therefore, there should be no grounds for its continuance under probation because none
[29:00.000 --> 29:02.000]  of the facts of the case have changed.
[29:02.000 --> 29:09.000]  Alcohol is not an issue, and the only substance to which the interlock is even applicable
[29:09.000 --> 29:12.000]  is alcohol-related.
[29:12.000 --> 29:14.000]  Okay.
[29:14.000 --> 29:20.000]  So unless part of your probation is that you're not even allowed to drink, then the interlock
[29:20.000 --> 29:23.000]  shouldn't be there.
[29:23.000 --> 29:24.000]  Right.
[29:24.000 --> 29:25.000]  Okay.
[29:25.000 --> 29:26.000]  Great.
[29:26.000 --> 29:28.000]  I'm on docket for tomorrow.
[29:28.000 --> 29:30.000]  I don't know what to expect.
[29:30.000 --> 29:31.000]  Okay.
[29:31.000 --> 29:32.000]  Well, hang on just a second, Angela.
[29:32.000 --> 29:35.000]  I've got to take a break, and then we'll come back and finish that up for you, okay?
[29:35.000 --> 29:36.000]  Okay.
[29:36.000 --> 29:37.000]  Thank you.
[29:37.000 --> 29:38.000]  You're welcome.
[29:38.000 --> 29:43.000]  All right, folks, call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:43.000 --> 29:44.000]  Give us a call.
[29:44.000 --> 29:45.000]  Get in line.
[29:45.000 --> 29:48.000]  Angela is my last caller, and I'm going to need some more to talk to.
[29:48.000 --> 30:02.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back, so y'all hang in there.
[30:02.000 --> 30:04.000]  Living alone is no fun.
[30:04.000 --> 30:07.000]  For one thing, you have to do all the chores by yourself.
[30:07.000 --> 30:11.000]  The new evidence suggests it may also increase the risk of becoming depressed.
[30:11.000 --> 30:17.000]  Let Dr. Catherine Albrecht back with details on loneliness and mental health next.
[30:17.000 --> 30:19.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:19.000 --> 30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:29.000]  So protect your rights.
[30:29.000 --> 30:33.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:33.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:38.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:38.000 --> 30:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:49.000]  We all know the elderly are more prone to depression if they live alone,
[30:49.000 --> 30:55.000]  but new research suggests that same pattern may also affect younger working-age adults.
[30:55.000 --> 30:58.000]  In a study of 3,500 people age 30 to 65,
[30:58.000 --> 31:02.000]  researchers found that a quarter of those living alone took antidepressants.
[31:02.000 --> 31:07.000]  That's almost double the rate of those who live with spouses, family, or roommates.
[31:07.000 --> 31:12.000]  Did living alone cause depression, or do depression-prone people simply prefer solitude?
[31:12.000 --> 31:17.000]  Both explanations are plausible, but there's one important wake-up call to all of us
[31:17.000 --> 31:21.000]  to reach out to friends, family members, and neighbors who live alone.
[31:21.000 --> 31:24.000]  Some human contact could make all the difference in their world.
[31:24.000 --> 31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.000 --> 31:35.000]  What are you thinking? Microplant powder with iodine and probiotics
[31:35.000 --> 31:38.000]  for a total body detox for around $10 a month.
[31:38.000 --> 31:42.000]  Infusa.org has 12 formulations of microplant powder
[31:42.000 --> 31:47.000]  for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon,
[31:47.000 --> 31:49.000]  and feel better than ever.
[31:49.000 --> 31:53.000]  It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products.
[31:53.000 --> 31:55.000]  That saves you space, time, and money.
[31:55.000 --> 31:58.000]  Call 888-910-4367.
[31:58.000 --> 32:02.000]  Only at infusa.org.
[32:02.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:08.000 --> 32:10.000]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.000 --> 32:18.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:18.000 --> 32:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:24.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce
[32:24.000 --> 32:26.000]  and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:32.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.000 --> 32:34.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:38.000 --> 32:41.000]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:43.000 --> 32:46.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:48.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 32:59.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.000 --> 33:07.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:07.000 --> 33:26.000]  Music
[33:26.000 --> 33:42.000]  Okay.
[33:42.000 --> 34:03.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[34:03.000 --> 34:09.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call-in number 512-646-1984.
[34:09.000 --> 34:12.000]  Everybody get online and get in line.
[34:12.000 --> 34:13.000]  Let's have somebody talk to you.
[34:13.000 --> 34:15.000]  Right now, we're talking to Angela.
[34:15.000 --> 34:18.000]  All right, Angela, please continue.
[34:18.000 --> 34:20.000]  Okay.
[34:20.000 --> 34:25.000]  All right, so tomorrow, if they were to deny,
[34:25.000 --> 34:31.000]  would they have any legal basis to deny my motion?
[34:31.000 --> 34:37.000]  Legal basis, no, but you never know.
[34:37.000 --> 34:43.000]  Right, and so if they were to deny, how would I object to that?
[34:43.000 --> 34:46.000]  Well, you object to it and simply file a notice of appeal,
[34:46.000 --> 34:50.000]  and you ask to appeal it above the court.
[34:50.000 --> 34:52.000]  Okay, that was my next question.
[34:52.000 --> 35:00.000]  So I should bring a notice of appeal with me just in case, and then, okay, awesome.
[35:00.000 --> 35:05.000]  Also, I had a question about, okay, the judge that I'm most likely going to see tomorrow
[35:05.000 --> 35:10.000]  is the normal judge that holds the court.
[35:10.000 --> 35:16.000]  The judge that signed my judgment was a fill-in judge,
[35:16.000 --> 35:23.000]  and he's also the same judge that signed my motion or allowed the motion to go through.
[35:23.000 --> 35:28.000]  There's a different judge that normally is in the court, and I have not yet met with her,
[35:28.000 --> 35:30.000]  but she may be there tomorrow.
[35:30.000 --> 35:31.000]  Would that make a difference?
[35:31.000 --> 35:37.000]  It shouldn't if she's listening to what the law says about things.
[35:37.000 --> 35:41.000]  Okay, and what you can do is if the judge tries to deny the motion, say,
[35:41.000 --> 35:47.000]  Judge, I object, and I ask the court to take judicial notice of the statute relating to the interlock
[35:47.000 --> 35:56.000]  where it specifically states that this can't be ordered if it's not necessary to the probation.
[35:56.000 --> 35:59.000]  There was no alcohol involved in this case.
[35:59.000 --> 36:09.000]  A breath interlock will serve no purpose other than to simply continue causing a cost to the defense
[36:09.000 --> 36:11.000]  that shouldn't be there.
[36:11.000 --> 36:15.000]  Right. Okay.
[36:15.000 --> 36:21.000]  And then if she does it anyway, then have your notice of appeal ready.
[36:21.000 --> 36:23.000]  And who do I file that with?
[36:23.000 --> 36:25.000]  You'll file it with the court right then.
[36:25.000 --> 36:27.000]  Judge, I object, and I intend to appeal the decision.
[36:27.000 --> 36:34.000]  In fact, I wish to file with the court at this time my written notice of intent to appeal.
[36:34.000 --> 36:42.000]  Okay. And would that go to the, then that would go to the court of appeals, correct?
[36:42.000 --> 36:46.000]  It would go to whatever courts above the one you're in.
[36:46.000 --> 36:48.000]  Okay. Okay.
[36:48.000 --> 36:53.000]  Well, you've pretty much confirmed a lot of the things I was already thinking.
[36:53.000 --> 36:54.000]  I appreciate it.
[36:54.000 --> 36:59.000]  I'm going to just do it if you have any extra stuff that I didn't really understand.
[36:59.000 --> 37:02.000]  Well, sounds like you've got the information you need.
[37:02.000 --> 37:07.000]  You just need to make sure you present it in a way that it's hard for the court to ignore.
[37:07.000 --> 37:09.000]  Okay. I will work on that.
[37:09.000 --> 37:11.000]  Okay.
[37:11.000 --> 37:12.000]  Thank you.
[37:12.000 --> 37:14.000]  Thank you for calling in.
[37:14.000 --> 37:15.000]  Bye-bye.
[37:15.000 --> 37:16.000]  Bye-bye.
[37:16.000 --> 37:22.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Richard, and I need some more callers, 512-646-1984.
[37:22.000 --> 37:25.000]  Richard, what can we do for you?
[37:25.000 --> 37:27.000]  Good evening, Eddie.
[37:27.000 --> 37:36.000]  After last week's show, I continued my research on the Internet about this whole topic, and I came across.
[37:36.000 --> 37:38.000]  Which whole topic?
[37:38.000 --> 37:45.000]  Of what we're talking about driving or traveling or using my conveyance.
[37:45.000 --> 37:46.000]  Okay.
[37:46.000 --> 37:54.000]  And I came across an ADL website, and it was titled Idiot Legal Arguments Section.
[37:54.000 --> 37:59.000]  And I was hoping you'd address some of these arguments that they're making.
[37:59.000 --> 38:09.000]  Now, this is a very long article, so I'd like, and it's, you know, it's not, it's written in very imprecise.
[38:09.000 --> 38:12.000]  So if I could just read some of it, and I'd like your opinion on it.
[38:12.000 --> 38:18.000]  One of the cases was State versus Brewer, and let me see where it picks up.
[38:18.000 --> 38:27.000]  It says, similarly, although alone in the truck, he tried to deny that he was driving a motor vehicle,
[38:27.000 --> 38:30.000]  quote unquote, but rather traveling in a conveyance.
[38:30.000 --> 38:37.000]  His reasoning for this premise is not based on any relevant statute or case precedent and has no merit.
[38:37.000 --> 38:47.000]  State law, parentheses, defines an operator as a person who is in actual physical control of a motor vehicle upon a highway.
[38:47.000 --> 38:54.000]  Since Davis was in actual physical control of the pickup truck, he was operating a motor vehicle.
[38:54.000 --> 38:59.000]  And then it cites State versus Davis, similarly arguing that traffic laws,
[38:59.000 --> 39:04.000]  even against driving the wrong way, that a one-way street violated the 10th Amendment.
[39:04.000 --> 39:06.000]  Are you familiar with this case, Eddie?
[39:06.000 --> 39:07.000]  No.
[39:07.000 --> 39:10.000]  Okay, then they started another one.
[39:10.000 --> 39:12.000]  What state is this case from?
[39:12.000 --> 39:16.000]  This one is the Tennessee, it seems, 97.
[39:16.000 --> 39:24.000]  Here is what I can address, and here is what the common denominator amongst all of these dissenting opinions in these courts are.
[39:24.000 --> 39:26.000]  And what court was this in, by the way?
[39:26.000 --> 39:34.000]  Actually, I don't really know how to, it says State versus Brewer, Tennessee criminal, APP 1997.
[39:34.000 --> 39:36.000]  Okay, it's a criminal appellate court.
[39:36.000 --> 39:39.000]  It's a Tennessee criminal appellate court.
[39:39.000 --> 39:40.000]  Okay.
[39:40.000 --> 39:49.000]  So that means it will not be whatever, well, unless there's criminal appellate court is the top level court, like the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is here.
[39:49.000 --> 39:50.000]  Okay?
[39:50.000 --> 39:56.000]  But regardless of this, this is what the courts, the attorneys in the courts, constantly do.
[39:56.000 --> 40:07.000]  They refuse to recognize the fact that any term defined by statute has a specialized meaning that is not the common meaning.
[40:07.000 --> 40:10.000]  That is by default.
[40:10.000 --> 40:11.000]  What?
[40:11.000 --> 40:13.000]  We discussed this last week.
[40:13.000 --> 40:26.000]  In every case they cite in this extended article, all has vehicle, driver, operator, all of the terms that you say, you know, contract you into a legal obligation.
[40:26.000 --> 40:30.000]  No, I didn't ever say that they contract you into anything.
[40:30.000 --> 40:35.000]  So let me finish my explanation instead of you trying to explain it for me.
[40:35.000 --> 40:37.000]  All right.
[40:37.000 --> 40:48.000]  They all use the statutory terms to describe common, perfectly valid acts of liberty.
[40:48.000 --> 40:51.000]  Those two don't go together.
[40:51.000 --> 41:00.000]  The statutory terms can only be applied to the regulated subject matter that the statute deals with.
[41:00.000 --> 41:10.000]  For instance, if you want to truly understand the definition of any term in any code, append the subject matter being regulated to the end of the definition.
[41:10.000 --> 41:25.000]  For instance, operate for the purpose of transportation, drive for the purpose of transportation, control of a motor vehicle for the purpose of transportation.
[41:25.000 --> 41:32.000]  Without the context, the definition can be twisted to mean anything they want.
[41:32.000 --> 41:41.000]  When they are forced to keep it in the context of the subject matter being regulated, their theory falls apart and they know it.
[41:41.000 --> 41:52.000]  What they do is they argue it as if that theory was never contested because nine times out of ten it was not properly contested.
[41:52.000 --> 41:55.000]  See, that's what I keep trying to tell people.
[41:55.000 --> 42:01.000]  You read it right there in the case that he was exercising his right to travel in a conveyance.
[42:01.000 --> 42:11.000]  The proper rebuttal of transportation is not right to travel, never has been, never will be,
[42:11.000 --> 42:21.000]  because even a truck driver or taxi driver has the right to travel except for when they're on the clock.
[42:21.000 --> 42:25.000]  Therefore, one is an assertion that you're on the clock.
[42:25.000 --> 42:28.000]  The other has nothing to do with the clock.
[42:28.000 --> 42:31.000]  How could it be a defense?
[42:31.000 --> 42:38.000]  Therefore, the proper argument is not engaged in transportation.
[42:38.000 --> 42:48.000]  Therefore, not having a motor vehicle for the purpose of transportation, not driving for the purpose of transportation.
[42:48.000 --> 42:57.000]  That's the part that no one uses in their defense to force the court to address the subject matter.
[42:57.000 --> 43:04.000]  They always use the statutory definitions as if they exist in a vacuum.
[43:04.000 --> 43:05.000]  They don't.
[43:05.000 --> 43:13.000]  They exist in the context of the regulated subject matter.
[43:13.000 --> 43:21.000]  What the courts do in this case, like you're talking about, they don't even have to go that far to misconstrue the law
[43:21.000 --> 43:27.000]  because the law was never properly rebutted in the first place.
[43:27.000 --> 43:28.000]  You get it?
[43:28.000 --> 43:29.000]  Yes.
[43:29.000 --> 43:30.000]  All right, hang on.
[43:30.000 --> 43:33.000]  I got another break and we'll finish this on the other side.
[43:33.000 --> 43:34.000]  Okay, great.
[43:34.000 --> 43:35.000]  All right, folks.
[43:35.000 --> 43:41.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[43:41.000 --> 43:43.000]  Give us a call, get in line, let's talk.
[43:43.000 --> 44:11.000]  We'll be right back after this break so y'all hang in there.
[44:13.000 --> 44:40.000]  We'll be right back after this break.
[44:40.000 --> 45:00.000]  We'll be right back after this break.
[45:00.000 --> 45:25.000]  We'll be right back after this break.
[45:25.000 --> 45:50.000]  We'll be right back.
[45:55.000 --> 46:22.000]  We'll be right back.
[46:22.000 --> 46:38.000]  All right, folks.
[46:38.000 --> 46:39.000]  We are back.
[46:39.000 --> 46:45.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, call in number 512-646-1984.
[46:45.000 --> 46:47.000]  We are talking with Richard.
[46:47.000 --> 46:49.000]  All right, Richard, go ahead.
[46:49.000 --> 46:53.000]  Yeah, Eddie, I think I went to the top of this article and I think the answer is right
[46:53.000 --> 46:57.000]  in their own definitions according to what you just enlightened us to.
[46:57.000 --> 47:03.000]  It says, relating to traffic laws, state government can restrict driving on the public roads to
[47:03.000 --> 47:09.000]  drivers with valid current licenses and restrict drivers to vehicles registered as having
[47:09.000 --> 47:14.000]  past inspection, not withstanding argument about a right to travel.
[47:14.000 --> 47:16.000]  Hendricks v. Maryland.
[47:16.000 --> 47:22.000]  A state may restrict the use of its highways to drivers who have complied with the license,
[47:22.000 --> 47:28.000]  insurance, and vehicle registration laws of the state if the driver is a nonresident of
[47:28.000 --> 47:32.000]  his home state, and they cite Bell v. Burson.
[47:32.000 --> 47:37.000]  A state statute which denies or suspends driver's license for failure to carry insurance for
[47:37.000 --> 47:42.000]  comparable financial responsibility does not violate the Constitution.
[47:42.000 --> 47:49.000]  Okay, Bell v. Burson is one I am familiar with, and they are using one part of the case
[47:49.000 --> 47:55.000]  while ignoring another part that draws the distinction between one and the other,
[47:55.000 --> 48:00.000]  the commercial use versus the private liberty use.
[48:00.000 --> 48:02.000]  Are not engaged in transportation.
[48:02.000 --> 48:03.000]  Correct.
[48:03.000 --> 48:08.000]  And didn't you use another term before, it was the right of locomotion or something?
[48:08.000 --> 48:13.000]  The United States Supreme Court has already ruled that the right to locomotion is an
[48:13.000 --> 48:15.000]  inherent right of liberty.
[48:15.000 --> 48:22.000]  And the right to locomotion, just like the right to keep and bear arms, was not changed
[48:22.000 --> 48:28.000]  because of the type of technology that evolved to service the right.
[48:28.000 --> 48:35.000]  The AR-15 is still as legitimate a use under the Second Amendment as the black powder musket.
[48:35.000 --> 48:41.000]  Therefore, the argument that the right to travel is not existent because you're in
[48:41.000 --> 48:47.000]  something with a motor in it rather than a horse and carriage suffers the same problem.
[48:47.000 --> 48:54.000]  The evolution of technology does not alter the exercise of the fundamental right by the
[48:54.000 --> 48:57.000]  common means of conveyance of the day.
[48:57.000 --> 49:02.000]  That is also stated in the United States Supreme Court case.
[49:02.000 --> 49:09.000]  So if we take the bait and go with the right to travel, that's where we're arguing the
[49:09.000 --> 49:10.000]  wrong case.
[49:10.000 --> 49:11.000]  Is that right?
[49:11.000 --> 49:15.000]  You're arguing the wrong rational fact basis.
[49:15.000 --> 49:16.000]  I see.
[49:16.000 --> 49:19.000]  You want to go with you're not engaged in transportation.
[49:19.000 --> 49:20.000]  Let me say it again.
[49:20.000 --> 49:26.000]  The only way to fight a legal allegation, let's pretend that for the sake of the analogy
[49:26.000 --> 49:29.000]  that legal allegations are fire.
[49:29.000 --> 49:30.000]  Okay?
[49:30.000 --> 49:31.000]  Okay.
[49:31.000 --> 49:38.000]  You cannot fight this fire with water, which would be the way you would think you could
[49:38.000 --> 49:40.000]  fight fire, right?
[49:40.000 --> 49:41.000]  Right.
[49:41.000 --> 49:47.000]  The only way you can fight the legal fire is with equal and opposite fire.
[49:47.000 --> 49:56.000]  In other words, what do they do on dry land when no water is available to stop a fire?
[49:56.000 --> 50:00.000]  They put sand on it.
[50:00.000 --> 50:03.000]  Or they dig a fire break.
[50:03.000 --> 50:04.000]  Okay.
[50:04.000 --> 50:05.000]  Okay?
[50:05.000 --> 50:11.000]  Which is basically removing any material that could be consumed by the fire so it stops
[50:11.000 --> 50:13.000]  at the boundary.
[50:13.000 --> 50:21.000]  By arguing not in transportation, that is our fire break to the assertion of engaged
[50:21.000 --> 50:24.000]  in transportation.
[50:24.000 --> 50:25.000]  Right.
[50:25.000 --> 50:31.000]  And then they go on to say that the right to travel is because they applied it to passports.
[50:31.000 --> 50:37.000]  In other words, because that is the only thing that they say that the courts have ever touched
[50:37.000 --> 50:40.000]  on and that is not true.
[50:40.000 --> 50:43.000]  That is absolutely not true.
[50:43.000 --> 50:49.000]  The courts have used the term right to travel only in relation to the ability of Americans
[50:49.000 --> 50:55.000]  to go to and from foreign countries with a passport or that some agency of the federal
[50:55.000 --> 51:01.000]  government has attempted to block the use of a passport with no legal valid grounds.
[51:01.000 --> 51:06.000]  So right to travel has always been linked to that area.
[51:06.000 --> 51:13.000]  But the right to locomotion has been ruled against time and time again as far as it being
[51:13.000 --> 51:20.000]  separate and distinct from transportation or the use of the highways for commercial
[51:20.000 --> 51:21.000]  purposes.
[51:21.000 --> 51:26.000]  Because there is tons of state and federal case law in every state of the union that
[51:26.000 --> 51:32.000]  specifically says the highways belong to the people for their private use and pleasure
[51:32.000 --> 51:36.000]  as a matter of right.
[51:36.000 --> 51:43.000]  The right cannot be subject to regulation that would prohibit the fundamental exercise
[51:43.000 --> 51:50.000]  of that right without the permission.
[51:50.000 --> 51:57.000]  Yes, so just so I can get this straight, you don't want to argue the right to travel.
[51:57.000 --> 52:01.000]  You want to argue you're not engaged in transportation, a right to locomotion.
[52:01.000 --> 52:02.000]  Is that correct?
[52:02.000 --> 52:09.000]  You argue not engaged in transportation or any other commercial use of the road.
[52:09.000 --> 52:15.000]  Private travel for personal business and pleasure through the right of liberty through
[52:15.000 --> 52:17.000]  locomotion.
[52:17.000 --> 52:20.000]  Liberty through locomotion, okay.
[52:20.000 --> 52:24.000]  All right, Eddie, it's really great to listen to your show.
[52:24.000 --> 52:30.000]  I hope you got my meager contribution in the mail from Louisiana, and I hope I can help
[52:30.000 --> 52:32.000]  out further in the future.
[52:32.000 --> 52:33.000]  All right.
[52:33.000 --> 52:34.000]  Well, I appreciate that, Richard.
[52:34.000 --> 52:35.000]  Thank you much.
[52:35.000 --> 52:36.000]  Thank you, Eddie.
[52:36.000 --> 52:37.000]  Bye-bye.
[52:37.000 --> 52:38.000]  Bye-bye.
[52:38.000 --> 52:39.000]  All right.
[52:39.000 --> 52:42.000]  Now we're going to go to Michael in Texas, and that's my last caller for the moment,
[52:42.000 --> 52:43.000]  so I need some more folks.
[52:43.000 --> 52:46.000]  512-646-1984.
[52:46.000 --> 52:49.000]  Michael, what do you got?
[52:49.000 --> 52:50.000]  Yeah.
[52:50.000 --> 52:51.000]  Hey, Eddie.
[52:51.000 --> 52:53.000]  This is going to be a short one, I think.
[52:53.000 --> 52:58.000]  Every so often when I listen to your show, which I don't get to listen as often as I
[52:58.000 --> 53:04.000]  would like to, you know, whether it's your show or you're a guest, you know, you'll make
[53:04.000 --> 53:10.000]  points that I just think are both inspiring and very informative and good in terms of
[53:10.000 --> 53:14.000]  summarizing the issues and crystallizing things I've heard you say for many years.
[53:14.000 --> 53:19.000]  You did that recently, and I thought you did it as a guest on the Rule of Law show, not
[53:19.000 --> 53:21.000]  your Monday night, in other words.
[53:21.000 --> 53:22.000]  Right.
[53:22.000 --> 53:27.000]  Yeah, I was on here a month or two ago with Randy on a couple of his shows.
[53:27.000 --> 53:29.000]  Oh, so maybe what they did...
[53:29.000 --> 53:30.000]  Well, I don't know.
[53:30.000 --> 53:34.000]  You see, I went back on the 6th because I was convinced it had to be Thursday, the 6th
[53:34.000 --> 53:35.000]  of August, but I wasn't...
[53:35.000 --> 53:36.000]  Yeah, I was on one of the...
[53:36.000 --> 53:39.000]  I was on the Thursday night show, and then I was on the Friday night show the next night
[53:39.000 --> 53:40.000]  as well.
[53:40.000 --> 53:42.000]  But you don't remember what day?
[53:42.000 --> 53:45.000]  No, I don't remember exactly what day.
[53:45.000 --> 53:49.000]  I can barely remember what I have for breakfast at the end of the day because of the number
[53:49.000 --> 53:51.000]  of people I've talked to.
[53:51.000 --> 53:52.000]  No sweat.
[53:52.000 --> 53:56.000]  I'll go back and listen to the last few Thursdays and Fridays, and eventually I'll get it.
[53:56.000 --> 54:01.000]  But I value what you have to say, and it was kind of a slap in the face, I guess you might
[54:01.000 --> 54:07.000]  say, a wake-up call when I thought a few things, and after talking to you both on the program
[54:07.000 --> 54:11.000]  and maybe I think privately once or twice, to realize that what it boils down to is,
[54:11.000 --> 54:15.000]  of course, like Randy always says, is building your case for appeal, but also making sure
[54:15.000 --> 54:18.000]  that when the traffic stops, or whatever you want to call it, I don't know what you call
[54:18.000 --> 54:22.000]  it, whatever they call it, the stop occurs, that you don't do anything that would compromise
[54:22.000 --> 54:26.000]  your case and form the basis for them to, you know, to bury you.
[54:26.000 --> 54:27.000]  Right.
[54:27.000 --> 54:31.000]  So, and that was kind of a rude way to take it to court the first time, but then to have
[54:31.000 --> 54:34.000]  to pay it twice, and it's like, oh my goodness.
[54:34.000 --> 54:39.000]  So, but all that being said, I do like to know what the issues are so that if the opportunity
[54:39.000 --> 54:44.000]  presents itself to do that very same thing again, that I'll be prepared to do so.
[54:44.000 --> 54:51.000]  Well, do you recall what it was that I said that you're discussing here?
[54:51.000 --> 54:58.000]  No, it was more 16,000 foot view topics, you know, kind of like what you just described
[54:58.000 --> 55:02.000]  to the gentleman there about, you know, what the bigger picture is.
[55:02.000 --> 55:08.000]  The bigger picture, as you say, is that you're not in commerce and you're not operating
[55:08.000 --> 55:13.000]  in transportation and so forth, but that was tonight.
[55:13.000 --> 55:17.000]  But no, I don't remember specifically well enough to comment as to what you discussed
[55:17.000 --> 55:24.000]  last time, but you actually, you had a new revelation of some sort.
[55:24.000 --> 55:27.000]  You kind of, every so often when you come on the shows, you know, you will have studied
[55:27.000 --> 55:32.000]  the days and weeks prior and you'll come to the plate with a new realization or a new
[55:32.000 --> 55:36.000]  interpretation of some things that you had been reading, and that's what happened.
[55:36.000 --> 55:40.000]  And when you started to roll, all that started to roll off your lips, so to speak, I was
[55:40.000 --> 55:43.000]  rather impressed with the summation of what you had to say before.
[55:43.000 --> 55:49.000]  Okay, well if you find it and it clicks, then please forward me the date and time of the
[55:49.000 --> 55:54.000]  show so I go back and remind myself, because I pretty much, by the time I get it to the
[55:54.000 --> 55:59.000]  end of the show, I will never remember what I said on the show.
[55:59.000 --> 56:03.000]  It's kind of like something's being channeled through me and I'm not in full control of
[56:03.000 --> 56:04.000]  it.
[56:04.000 --> 56:09.000]  It just comes out of my mouth based upon what's buried in my brain, and when it's over, I
[56:09.000 --> 56:12.000]  don't realize half of what I've said two hours later.
[56:12.000 --> 56:13.000]  Right.
[56:13.000 --> 56:14.000]  Right.
[56:14.000 --> 56:15.000]  Okay, great.
[56:15.000 --> 56:20.000]  And I haven't heard Debbie's voice on any of the programs in a while.
[56:20.000 --> 56:24.000]  You keep calling her Debbie, you're going to hear it here any minute and you ain't going
[56:24.000 --> 56:25.000]  to like it.
[56:25.000 --> 56:26.000]  Yes, thank you.
[56:26.000 --> 56:27.000]  Thank you.
[56:27.000 --> 56:28.000]  Yes, yes, yes.
[56:28.000 --> 56:29.000]  Sorry about that.
[56:29.000 --> 56:32.000]  That's a common mistake, I guess, but not a very friendly one.
[56:32.000 --> 56:34.000]  I apologize if she's listening.
[56:34.000 --> 56:35.000]  So, yeah.
[56:35.000 --> 56:39.000]  But is she still kind of actively involved or a little more hands-on?
[56:39.000 --> 56:41.000]  Yeah, she's still the producer of everything on the network.
[56:41.000 --> 56:44.000]  She still handles everything on that side of it.
[56:44.000 --> 56:49.000]  She does, on occasion when time allows, she's still on the show with Randy on Thursdays,
[56:49.000 --> 56:54.000]  though she does let him handle the Friday night portions with whatever guests he's got
[56:54.000 --> 56:56.000]  and things like that.
[56:56.000 --> 57:01.000]  And for a while there, he was partnered up with Steve and Joe and I don't know currently
[57:01.000 --> 57:03.000]  how any of that's going.
[57:03.000 --> 57:04.000]  Okay.
[57:04.000 --> 57:05.000]  Yeah.
[57:05.000 --> 57:06.000]  Okay.
[57:06.000 --> 57:10.000]  So, except for the couple of nights that I was on here in the recent past, I pretty
[57:10.000 --> 57:14.000]  much stick to my show and then I spend my days helping my clients and doing my research
[57:14.000 --> 57:19.000]  and writing my book and then bringing whatever I've developed back here to discuss on the
[57:19.000 --> 57:21.000]  next show.
[57:21.000 --> 57:23.000]  So, speaking of which, two questions.
[57:23.000 --> 57:26.000]  One, are there any late-breaking developments?
[57:26.000 --> 57:30.000]  I know you're stay busy all the time, but with respect to the developments of town law
[57:30.000 --> 57:36.000]  website and also you had made some reference to possibly, possibly moving in the not too
[57:36.000 --> 57:37.000]  terribly distant future.
[57:37.000 --> 57:39.000]  Are there any updates on either of those two?
[57:39.000 --> 57:41.000]  As of yet, no.
[57:41.000 --> 57:46.000]  We don't have the funding for the move part of anything yet to set up the place that we're
[57:46.000 --> 57:47.000]  wanting to set up.
[57:47.000 --> 57:49.000]  As far as town law, yes.
[57:49.000 --> 57:54.000]  My friend that's helping me do the programming has finished a project he was working on.
[57:54.000 --> 57:59.000]  He's relocated to a new house out of the war zone he was having to live in in Dallas.
[57:59.000 --> 58:05.000]  So, now he's actually got a little bit of breathing room and I'm also trying to get
[58:05.000 --> 58:11.000]  some sponsors to help fund the website so that we're able as well as you guys wherever
[58:11.000 --> 58:16.000]  I can and use that money to pay him a little and pay me a little for the bills that we've
[58:16.000 --> 58:20.000]  got to make this work because we've both got bills to pay but we've also got to pay for
[58:20.000 --> 58:24.000]  the server and everything else because I've had the server running for two and a half
[58:24.000 --> 58:30.000]  years completely out of my own pocket with nothing to show for it because we're using
[58:30.000 --> 58:32.000]  it both for development and production.
[58:32.000 --> 58:35.000]  If you've got anything else, hang on.
[58:35.000 --> 58:38.000]  If not, I'll talk to you after a while but I've got to take a break here.
[58:38.000 --> 58:41.000]  Alright folks, 512-646-1984.
[58:41.000 --> 58:45.000]  We'll be right back.
[58:45.000 --> 58:49.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[58:49.000 --> 58:53.000]  Yet, countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:53.000 --> 58:59.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text but in the process can compromise
[58:59.000 --> 59:02.000]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:02.000 --> 59:04.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:04.000 --> 59:10.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate but the real story is the more
[59:10.000 --> 59:13.000]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:18.000 --> 59:23.000]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:23.000 --> 59:28.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:28.000 --> 59:38.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:38.000 --> 59:42.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:42.000 --> 59:45.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:45.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:06.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:28.000]  Markets for the 17th of August, 2015 opened up with gold at $1,117.23 an ounce, silver
[01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:34.000]  $15.33 an ounce, Texas crude $42.50 a barrel and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about
[01:00:34.000 --> 01:00:42.000]  $258 U.S. currency.
[01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:48.000]  Today in history, Friday, August 17th, 1945, as set forth in the Cairo Conference between
[01:00:48.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  Japan, the Soviet Union and the United States, Korea was divided into North and South.
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  The Allied victory of World War II effectively ended the empire of Japan's 35-year colonial
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:00:58.000]  rule of Korea.
[01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  The United States and the Soviet Union agreed to temporarily occupy the country as a trusteeship
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:10.000]  with the zone of control along the 38th parallel.
[01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:15.000]  In recent news, back in May, the IRS reported that identity thieves were able to use the
[01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:21.000]  agency's Get Transcript program to get personal information on as many as 114,000 taxpayers.
[01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:26.000]  Today, the IRS revealed an additional 220,000 accounts had apparently also been hacked.
[01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  However, the amount of stolen information is undeterminable at the moment.
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:35.000]  The hackers accessed the IRS Get Transcript system with information about taxpayers acquired
[01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:39.000]  from other sources and used it to correctly answer a series of security questions, giving
[01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:41.000]  them access to private financial data.
[01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:45.000]  The agency is assuring that taxpayers whose information may have been potentially breached
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  will be getting letters in the mail in the coming days.
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:51.000]  The compromised accounts will also receive access to free credit protection and identity
[01:01:51.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  protection pins.
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:01.000]  Documents released by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden and analyzed by the New York
[01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  Times and ProPublica show that over the course of several decades, under mounting political
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:10.000]  pressure, AT&T gave the NSA access to billions of emails that flowed through its domestic
[01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:15.000]  networks and assisted in carrying out a secret court order that allowed the wiretapping of
[01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:18.000]  Internet communications at the United Nations headquarters.
[01:02:18.000 --> 01:02:22.000]  These revelations are timely considering that the Electronic Frontier Foundation is suing
[01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  the NSA on behalf of AT&T customers for what it is claiming is an illegal, unconstitutional,
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:32.000]  and ongoing dragnet surveillance of their communications and communications records.
[01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:36.000]  Electronic Frontier Foundation executive director Cindy Kahn told ProPublica that the
[01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  Foundation will present the new information in court.
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:43.000]  In response to the report, AT&T spokesman Brad Burns told the Times,
[01:02:43.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  We do not voluntarily provide information to any investigating authorities other than
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:53.000]  if a person's life is in danger at times of the essence.
[01:02:53.000 --> 01:03:18.000]  This has been the Lowdown for August 17, 2013.
[01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:51.000]  All right, folks.
[01:03:51.000 --> 01:03:54.000]  We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:54.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:00.000]  I've got an hour left in the show.
[01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  I need some people up on the board.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:05.000]  Right now, we have Jimmy in Maryland.
[01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  Jimmy, how goes your way up there?
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:10.000]  Oh, it is going, Eddie.
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:12.000]  Good to hear from you again.
[01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:13.000]  You too.
[01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:15.000]  I want to give you an update.
[01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  I said you too.
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:19.000]  At least you're still able to call in.
[01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:22.000]  Yeah, for now.
[01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:24.000]  I'm giving an update on...
[01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  I talked to you about a month ago.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:31.000]  I had a case where I told you I was cited with a petition's license.
[01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  The date of birth is like 40 years different, you know, younger,
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:39.000]  me being 40 years younger.
[01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:45.000]  I did like I said, I filed a motion to quash the citation.
[01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:53.000]  The judge wrote back, he said the situation would be dealt with on the trial date.
[01:04:53.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  So I come to court and I saw the public defendant that I used in a previous case I was fighting.
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  You know, she was there.
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:06.000]  And so, you know, they called me up and I...
[01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:09.000]  And, you know, the judge, the prosecutor, the prosecutor wanted to do it.
[01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:12.000]  He said it's a first-time offense.
[01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:15.000]  I've already been a three-time offender, been convicted three times
[01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:17.000]  on driving a suspended license.
[01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  You know, get out of state with driving a suspended license,
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  get proper lane change, and no registration.
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:28.000]  So I'm like, they don't even know who I am.
[01:05:28.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  It was really strange.
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:32.000]  And so I went to the judge and he said,
[01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:37.000]  do you really go along with paying $200 in first-time offense
[01:05:37.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  and, you know, in what they call it, probation for a judgment?
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:43.000]  I said, no, sir.
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:45.000]  I filed a motion to quash this.
[01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:50.000]  And I explained to him that I filed this and I got a response back from you.
[01:05:50.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  And then he tells me, well, is that going to be dealt with if you want to go to trial?
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  I'm thinking to myself, this is a pre-trial motion here.
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  It's not a trial motion.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:04.000]  It's a pre-trial motion.
[01:06:04.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  And he's like trying to force me, explain me to go to trial.
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:12.000]  And since the prosecutor had to talk to me, he decided, you know, to pass it on.
[01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:15.000]  And so the prosecutor called me up, took her defendant, you know,
[01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  she came by because I showed her the warrant and everything,
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:20.000]  and he said, that's not a date of birth.
[01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:23.000]  And he said, okay, hon, I'm going to dismiss it.
[01:06:23.000 --> 01:06:28.000]  And so they called me up in no process in all three offenses.
[01:06:28.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  They had my paperwork in life.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:35.000]  And they called me up on that.
[01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:39.000]  Which leaves you going where?
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  Say it again.
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  Which leaves you going where?
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:49.000]  Leaves me going to start filing for false arrest suit.
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  I was locked up at a field commissioner.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  Even the judge at the, what do you call it, the arraignment hearing.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  And he said, I'm going to stand, and this is an error.
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:12.000]  I'm going to go get the transcripts and file a lawsuit.
[01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  So they dismissed it then?
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  Yes.
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:16.000]  No process.
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:18.000]  They decided not to prosecute.
[01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  Okay.
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  He was saying, when you did that, I went through this before when I saw the judge back in May.
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:34.000]  And then the defendant just happened to come up there, and she knew who I was, and I showed her the more than anything prior to Susan calling my case.
[01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  And she knew who I was, so she just told the prosecutor, it's not a date of birth.
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  And he said, okay, I'm just going to dismiss it then.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:46.000]  Called up no process.
[01:07:46.000 --> 01:07:47.000]  Okay.
[01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:52.000]  Well, here's the only thing about that.
[01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  In order to win the malicious prosecution, you're going to have to show that jeopardy attached in some way or shape or form.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  So that either means that they indicted you, they actually filed a valid complaint against you, and then proceeded.
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:25.000]  They don't necessarily have to take you to trial, but they have to go to at least whatever step is considered moving the prosecutorial power of the state against you, which then caused jeopardy to attach.
[01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  So that can be argued, in my opinion, that can be argued that the fact that you were commanded to appear to answer to the charges on multiple dates and times, that can be proven.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:44.000]  Now, the case law may say otherwise.
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:58.000]  The attorneys have a real idiotic idea of when jeopardy attaches. Jeopardy attached, in my opinion, the moment the cop was belligerent enough to pull you over and threaten you with violence for not doing what he wanted.
[01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  That's when jeopardy actually attached, not just prosecutorial, but possibly getting murdered.
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  So you may have an action against the officer, maybe, depending upon how the court wants to rule on that one, but you may not for malicious prosecution unless you can prove jeopardy attached.
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:38.000]  Okay. Now, I appeared in May to the judge, and I thought they dismissed it when they came up that it wasn't my date of birth, that it wasn't May, but she was found a bench warrant, and I was locked up. So I went twice for the same thing.
[01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:53.000]  Yeah, then you may have a suit for false imprisonment or false arrest, but that would have to be—and remember, the judge, when they issue a warrant, is acting administratively, not judicially, so they have no immunity for that.
[01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  So the fact that they screwed up on their paperwork and threw you in jail gives you grounds to go after them.
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  Okay.
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  But it may not be for malicious prosecution. It may be for false imprisonment.
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:14.000]  Okay. So where it sounds like it'll be easy to get them for false imprisonment, but for this prosecution, I got to—
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  It depends on what the elements of malicious prosecution are in Maryland.
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  Now, the other issue here is the fact that since they issued the warrant on top of the false imprisonment, the reason the officer may be immune is because he may have a good faith reliance on the paperwork that he was given.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  The question becomes, who signed the Statement of Probable Cause and what facts were asserted in it that allowed the judge to issue the warrant? That's the officer you can go after.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  Okay. The officer.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:04.000]  The Statement of Probable Cause that was required for the judge to issue the warrant. Somebody had to sign one.
[01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  Okay. Well, they said it was just—they said it failed to appear.
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:17.000]  Again, someone had to say that you failed to appear. Someone had to make that statement to swear out the warrant.
[01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:22.000]  That could have been a clerk of the court. They're culpable.
[01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  Okay. I see what you're saying. Okay. I look into that.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:41.000]  Okay. I have to look deep into that. I am going to get the transcripts and everything.
[01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:48.000]  Okay. All right, Eddie. I'll keep your attention to what's going on and let you know.
[01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  All right. Thanks, Jimmy.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:51.000]  Thank you.
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  Yes, sir. You have a good night.
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:12:03.000]  All right, folks. That was—all right, man. That was my last caller. I need some more. 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:11.000]  Now, let's go until I get some. Let's go back to what I was talking about.
[01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:27.000]  When we allow the people controlling the system to operate outside of all the limitations we placed upon them, why do we expect them to be doing the right thing the right way?
[01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:40.000]  They're like a spoiled child. They believe that because there is no repercussions for what they do that they can simply do it any time it suits them.
[01:12:40.000 --> 01:12:54.000]  But the reason that they're spoiled is because we have attorneys in every branch of government, and they are not allowed to be in every branch of government, especially here in Texas.
[01:12:54.000 --> 01:13:17.000]  Here in Texas, Article 2 is our separation of powers clause. Article 2 specifically tells us that no member or group of people of any department of government may exercise any power belonging to any person or office in any other department of government.
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  You have the State Bar Act from 1939, which created the State Bar. Chapter 81 or 82—I forget which one it's in, of the government code—is where the State Bar Act is codified.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  In the very beginning of the State Bar Act, it says that the State Bar is created as an administrative office of the judicial department of government, which means by default every bar card carrying attorney is a judicial officer.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  Therefore, in violation of the separation of powers, they are also sitting in the legislature. They are also sitting as the governor, as the attorney general, and in many other occupations they are not allowed under the separation of powers to sit.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  Bar card carrying attorneys are sitting as your legislative representatives in violation of the Texas Constitution, creating statutory schemes that benefit them and their cronies at the expense of our rights, our Constitution, and our liberty.
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:46.000]  And we are doing nothing about it. We are taking no one to task. We are pressing no charges. We are not even raising a fuss about it. Why?
[01:14:46.000 --> 01:15:03.000]  Because football game's on. I don't have time. I've got work. I have a vacation coming up. It'll interfere with my time off from work. It'll cause me to take time off from work. I won't make as much money.
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:17.000]  I won't do this. I won't do that. It may cost me some actual frickin' effort on my part to participate in my form of government so I can be free and help others do the same.
[01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  Yep. So why are we not doing anything about it? Oh, wait. I just covered just about everything, right? We're pathetic, people. Do we even deserve liberty and freedom anymore?
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  As Americans, do we even deserve it? Let's think about this. We rail against welfare because those people won't work to make a living, or at least a lot of them don't work to make a living,
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:16:04.000]  and they suck at the teeth of the system on money taken from those that have sweated and toiled to earn for themselves just to have it taken away by the state through taxation and extortive means and other ways,
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:20.000]  all to fund people, the majority of which are not making an honest living to begin with and have no intention of ever doing so. They game the system day in and day out. Okay?
[01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  What do they care? But at the same time, while we're screaming about those welfare recipients, we're sitting back doing exactly the same thing in relation to rights and liberty. We're living on welfare.
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  We want something for nothing to protect our rights and liberty. We don't want to put any real effort into making it work. We don't want to put any real effort into making it last and making it strong and getting their hands out of it.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  We are all welfare recipients when we do that. We'll be right back. Y'all hang on.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:19.000]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals. We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists. If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  In addition, we carry popular Young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burps. We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment. Call us at 512-646-6440. We're located at 7304 Burnet Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:11.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jeopardy can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Young Jeopardy so much we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jeopardy, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:59.000]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  Alright, now as I was saying, when we refuse to stand up for ourselves to earn the freedoms that we have through fighting off those that would take them away, we're no better than the welfare recipients we're complaining about.
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:20.000]  We're expecting something for nothing.
[01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  Freedom has never been and it never will be free as long as there are people in the world that think their opinion should rightfully be everyone else's opinion, whether everyone else wants to have that opinion and agrees with it or not.
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:52.000]  And we have buttloads of those in this country, unfortunately, and also unfortunately, they're the ones that control virtually everything.
[01:20:52.000 --> 01:21:00.000]  Their perspective and point of view and desires are all the rest of us are allowed to seek out and work toward.
[01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:21.000]  We're not allowed to be innovative on our own. We're not allowed to do anything on our own if what we want to do in any way derail any part of the system that they've built to contain us and to deprive us of that liberty that we want for nothing.
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:28.000]  America was not created without bloodshed and conflict.
[01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  Liberty was not achieved without bloodshed and conflict.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  The part that I don't understand is how so many people can choose not be fooled into but literally choose to keep their head buried in the sand.
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  And the firm belief that as long as they can't see the lion prowling around for food, that the lion won't see them either.
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  And it simply doesn't work that way.
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  Staying in your home, being entertained with your sports shows, your TV, your magazines, your whatever, your video game consoles, your pizza boxes, your fast food.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:47.000]  None of that is any better than sticking your head in the sand while the rest of you sits out there in plain view to be eaten.
[01:22:47.000 --> 01:23:05.000]  And the more you choose to remain that way, what do you think is going to happen when the lion has finally got no other food source left but you sticking out of the sand over there?
[01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  And, you know, 2,200 million other people just like you. But the fact of the matter is luck of the draw is the only thing that's going to keep you where you think you rightfully are.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:24.000]  It's not going to be anything else.
[01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  We cannot be a free country and be an idle, apathetic people.
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:36.000]  You can't do it.
[01:23:36.000 --> 01:24:03.000]  You know that most of the countries that we consider to be beneath us in many ways are much better places to live because they don't have the oppression that the Americans have to live under while proclaiming that oppression to actually be liberty.
[01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:05.000]  Now, do you understand that?
[01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:18.000]  We have come to love the bars of our cage so much that we literally believe the bars represent freedom.
[01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:27.000]  How is that not pathetic on a grand scale?
[01:24:27.000 --> 01:24:29.000]  That's America.
[01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:31.000]  Take it or leave it.
[01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:35.000]  Isn't that how everybody says it? You don't like this country, you go somewhere else.
[01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  Believe me, if I had the money at this point, I probably would.
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:58.000]  Because I'm living in a nation of stupid people that think they actually have a choice in how they live their life while sitting in their armchair doing nothing.
[01:24:58.000 --> 01:25:24.000]  The very people that you see in the news rioting, screaming about racism and being downtrodden and under the thumb of the so-called white man or the system and all this stuff, every single time there's an election, vote to put the very same people back in office that are responsible for the very slavery that they keep putting themselves in.
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  Imagine that.
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  I don't want to be a slave.
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:30.000]  Oh, wait, those are my shackles?
[01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  Great, let me put them on, and I'll stand here and scream about not being a slave while you shackle me down with my welfare, with my drugs, with the drug war, by keeping me under your thumb in prison, by making my quality of life so low that I do anything to get out of it, including murder.
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:25:59.000]  And we just allow it to go on and on and on.
[01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:01.000]  No fault but ours, people.
[01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  No fault but ours.
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:06.000]  All right, I've got a caller up here.
[01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  I can't see who, but it's air code 903.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:13.000]  Who am I talking to?
[01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:16.000]  Well, this is Robert Burnett.
[01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:19.000]  I'm here in the big city of New Braunsville.
[01:26:19.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  All right, Robert, what can we do for you?
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  I'm working on a project here.
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:34.000]  The city of New Braunsville is changing everything, trying to change the Texas statutes where they can do a quote, hands-free ordinance here in town.
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  Right.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  And beyond just the cell phone, they've added everything from cell phone to PCs and MP3 players, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  And in contact with the city, they haven't even got a clue as to how they're going to handle this in court and law yet.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:58.000]  And it's...
[01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  Now, they're using which statute, the transportation code?
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  Yes, they're using the transportation code, that 545.424 that uses handheld in school zones, also gives permission for cities to establish a citywide ban.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  All right, listen very carefully, folks, to what he's talking about here.
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  Let me give you this piece of information.
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  I can prove absolutely using nothing more than the Texas Constitution, the original enactment bill of the transportation code from 1995, certified by the Secretary of State,
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  that the transportation code is unconstitutional in its entirety as it was not passed in any manner compliant with the Texas Constitution.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  The whole code is absolutely invalid on its face, every single letter in every single word.
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  So believe me, you are correct.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  They don't have a clue how they're going to handle this in a court of law if you bring the right argument.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  My first question is, where do they get the authority for an ordinance?
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:18.000]  Well, that's just it.
[01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  They don't.
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  The only way that ordinance will have any effect is over their employees, their contractors, and anyone working for a legal entity while on duty with that legal entity that's within their territorial boundaries.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  The municipalities in Texas have no authority to make binding public law, none.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:44.000]  Correct.
[01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:50.000]  Now, have you read the art, the white page that I wrote for my book chapter that's on my blog spot?
[01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  Yeah, that was the starting point for this whole program I'm working on.
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:57.000]  Okay.
[01:28:57.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  I've tried to get ahold of city attorneys.
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  Okay.
[01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:08.000]  Well, there's two other aspects you need to tie into that, one of which I'm going to post up here in the next day or two on the blog as well.
[01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  The fact that the State Bar Act violates the Texas Constitution and is unconstitutional because attorneys are who created the statutory problems we have by illegally sitting in the legislature in the first place.
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  That's the other paper.
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  And the third one you need to go with it, not only is the State Bar Act the problem and the Transportation Code itself the problem, you need the bill that shows how it was enacted and the white paper I'm trying to do on why it's unconstitutional as a whole in conjunction with the ordinance paper you've got.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  Those three documents make an absolutely impenetrable argument as to why they can't do what they're doing.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:56.000]  Hang on just a second, Robert, and we'll pick you up on the other side of this break.
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  All right, folks, we'll be right back so y'all hang on.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  It's been called the perfect food, and in the early part of the 20th century, this food was actually used to treat and sometimes cure disease.
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and in just a moment, I'll be back with the raw facts.
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:19.000]  Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:20.000]  That's creepy.
[01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:36.000]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:39.000]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:47.000]  If cream in your coffee sends you reeling with cramps, you could be lactose intolerant.
[01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  For millions, even small amounts of milk can be trouble.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:57.000]  But a surprising new trend is a lot of people saying move over pasteurized milk and bring on the real stuff, raw milk.
[01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:02.000]  Research shows four out of five people with lactose intolerance can drink raw milk with no symptoms.
[01:31:02.000 --> 01:31:06.000]  And farm families who drink raw milk have fewer allergies than the rest of us.
[01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  For thousands of years, people drank milk straight from the cow right to the glass.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  No pasteurizing, no homogenizing.
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  So go ahead, pour some in your coffee, splash some on your cereal.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:16.000]  Raw milk.
[01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:18.000]  Talk about doing a body good.
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:07.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:12.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:15.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:22.000]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:33.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement. May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:13.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradio.com.
[01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:47.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:50.000]  All right, sir, go ahead.
[01:33:50.000 --> 01:34:01.000]  Yeah, my big understanding is I went through 800 statutes for the state of Texas this over the weekend, line by line.
[01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  And there is absolutely no authority for a city ordinance anywhere to do safety other than housing.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:20.000]  I mean, 800 ordinances in the only time the state has ever mentioned was considered, you know, housing construction or, you know, plumbing.
[01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:21.000]  Right.
[01:34:21.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  Again, they are not allowed to create binding public law.
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  They can use, they can regulate legal entities, i.e., incorporated business enterprises that are engaged in regulable business such as electricians, plumbers, things like that within their territorial boundaries.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:49.000]  But they cannot use those ordinances against the public or private property.
[01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  They think they can, but they can't because they are not binding public law.
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:35:00.000]  They cannot even begin to be binding public law.
[01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  Right.
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:09.000]  Well, I just wanted to give everybody around the country a heads up because evidently the feds is going to be trying to do the same thing nationwide.
[01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:12.000]  Well, they've been trying to do the same thing for a long time.
[01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:22.000]  The feds have been buying off the state legislatures through the federal kickback funds to get the states to give the feds access to everything in the state to do what they've been doing.
[01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:24.000]  They've been doing that since the 60s.
[01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:28.000]  If not longer.
[01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  That's where all these federal highway funds, all these federal grants, all these federal everythings, that's how they're getting inside the states to begin with.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  Your legislature is selling you out when what they should be doing is say, well, I tell you what, instead of you having to pay us back our own money that you never should have gotten,
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  we'll just keep it and we'll only send you the money that the federal constitution authorizes you to spend on the 18 enumerated powers.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:05.000]  You won't get another extra penny from us.
[01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  Then we solve that economic problem.
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:22.000]  Well, just wanted to say, appreciate your show and really appreciate, especially doing all this, seeing what kind of hell you've been through the last few years, trying to put a line on some of this stuff.
[01:36:22.000 --> 01:36:24.000]  Well, I appreciate that.
[01:36:24.000 --> 01:36:28.000]  And yeah, it definitely has not been pleasant in a lot of aspects, believe me.
[01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  But I wouldn't trade it for where I've gotten to with it because if I've helped people do what needs to be done, I'm happy.
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  Well, you've got a lot of people out there today that have stepped across the line before.
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  We just step back and let the world pass them by.
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  Well, if that's true, I'm glad to know it.
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:53.000]  Okay.
[01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  Well, you're hanging in.
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  We appreciate you all your help.
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:56.000]  All right.
[01:36:56.000 --> 01:36:57.000]  Thanks, sir.
[01:36:57.000 --> 01:36:58.000]  All right.
[01:36:58.000 --> 01:36:59.000]  You have a great night.
[01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:01.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  You too, sir.
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:03.000]  All right, folks.
[01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  I still got a half an hour left in this show and I don't have enough callers to fill it up.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:13.000]  I need some callers, 512-646-1984.
[01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:19.000]  In the meantime, let's go back to where we were once again.
[01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  We expect that what we do to gain our liberty comes without a cost, without a price, without an effort.
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:34.000]  And that simply could not be more untrue.
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  Folks, I didn't become the co-host on this show by doing nothing.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:49.000]  I had to study and research my behind-off because of what was happening to me by the state comptroller's office
[01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  to illegally seize my business and my property without any actual law behind anything they were doing,
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:03.000]  which at the time I didn't know and didn't know how to do anything about.
[01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  And when I started researching it, had absolutely no one to discuss it with.
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  It was more than a year before I discovered Rule of Law Radio, before I started calling in to Rule of Law Radio,
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  before I started discussing what was going on with Randy and Deborah to see what recommendations, if any, they could help me to find.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  They did their best, but neither of them had dealt with this subject matter directly before.
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  So regardless of how much help I would have liked to have received, there just wasn't anyone to provide it.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  So it was all up to me, and I buckled down and said,
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  okay, this is important enough to me that I'm not going to sit back and let it just wash over me and drown me.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:57.000]  Folks, you need to be willing to make up your mind to do the same thing.
[01:38:57.000 --> 01:39:06.000]  If you can't do that, you will drown. They will make sure you will drown.
[01:39:06.000 --> 01:39:12.000]  I didn't come up with all the arguments that I have come up with off the top of my head.
[01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:18.000]  I came up with these arguments after digging through their own statutory scheme
[01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  in relation to my rights in the Constitution to see where we had any implications of conflict
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:33.000]  and asking myself questions about how could this be and this also be,
[01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  because this is two pieces of matter trying to occupy the same space at the same time,
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  which is impossible in the laws of physics.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  You can't have a protected right occupying the same space as an unprotected privilege.
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:57.000]  They cannot occupy the same space at the same time.
[01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  And one is not allowed to force or displace the other.
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:10.000]  That's the part that most people fail to understand.
[01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  The privilege cannot be used to compel the removal or displacement of the right.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:28.000]  Once you understand that and you refuse to let it go,
[01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:34.000]  the whole process of argument and thought changes
[01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  because you're no longer trying to operate from an indefensible position of authority,
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  you're defending from the point of a right.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  Who gave the legislature the power to remove this right?
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  Nobody. So how did they do it? They can't.
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  Then the statute's ineffective. It can't apply here because.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  Now, that is the things that I learned while I was going through the stuff on the sales tax.
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:16.000]  And believe me, the stuff I learned about the sales tax was extremely revealing.
[01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:21.000]  It's what led to the whole argument of indentured servitude.
[01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  The state forces you to act as its tax collector.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  You are not allowed to negotiate what you consider a fair wage or salary to be that tax collector.
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:40.000]  They tell you you are going to work for us and you will do it for this amount of money,
[01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:47.000]  which is 0.05 percent or 0.08 percent of whatever you actually collect.
[01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:55.000]  And if that is not enough to compensate you for the expenses involved in reporting and paying it over to us,
[01:41:55.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  that remainder comes out of your pocket and you have no choice.
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:08.000]  How is that not indentured servitude? I'm not allowed to negotiate my pay for doing the work.
[01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:12.000]  I am told that I have no choice but to do the work.
[01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  I may get paid as long as I do it within a certain time frame.
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  But if I don't, then I don't get paid at all. And note, they're not required to pay me.
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:27.000]  And if I don't do any of the—that they have no authority over in the first place,
[01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:32.000]  how is that not indentured servitude?
[01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  The entire tax scheme that they use for the sales tax is meant to prey upon the ignorant for the financial benefit of the state,
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:51.000]  when in fact the only people that the sales tax can be applied to is incorporated businesses.
[01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  And those are incorporated businesses that are from outside of Texas, that are headquartered elsewhere,
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:06.000]  and have open franchises within our borders to compete with our local business.
[01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  That is what the sales tax applies to, not to the mom-and-pop unincorporated DBAs.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:20.000]  Never has.
[01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  But you'll never hear the state admit it, you'll never hear those tax agents admit it,
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  even when you show it to them in black and white, Dell at North.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  So, folks, this is why you must be more educated on the subject matter than they are.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  And you must be educated on what your rights are better than they are, so that you can fight back.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  All right, I've got some callers up on the board. I'll get those calls on the other side.
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll be right back, so y'all hang on. We're coming up into the last segment of the show.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:07.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics? Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  What?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:27.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are coming into our last segment of the show.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  Right now, we've got several callers up on the board, and we're going to start with Mary in Texas.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  Mary, what can we do for you?
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  Hello, Mary.
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:53.000]  Mary.
[01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:57.000]  All right, well, I'll get back to Mary if we get done here.
[01:46:57.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  Instead, let's go to Brad.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:03.000]  Brad, what can we do for you?
[01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:12.000]  I have a question regarding the process for fighting a ticket in court.
[01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:21.000]  Okay, you go in to file your affidavit of not in transportation on your initial appearance,
[01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:30.000]  and the court clerk refuses to accept the affidavit and tells you that you have to enter a plea
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:35.000]  in order to get a case number before the clerk will file the affidavit.
[01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:37.000]  What do you do?
[01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:43.000]  You tell the clerk to thank you for the legal advice in their attempt to impersonate a judicial officer.
[01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:51.000]  Can you please speak to their supervisor so that you can file a criminal complaint for their actions?
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:58.000]  Okay, so the clerk is required by law to...
[01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:09.000]  The clerk has no authority to deny anyone whatsoever to file any document in relation to their case, period.
[01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:16.000]  Nor does the clerk have any authority under law whatsoever to conduct a proceeding
[01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  and preside over it for the purpose of taking and entering a plea onto any part of the judicial record.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  Is there a special process or procedure for them taking a complaint?
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  Taking a complaint?
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:40.000]  Or I mean taking a plea?
[01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:46.000]  No, there is no authority for a clerk to take a plea ever.
[01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:57.000]  The Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 45 in the fine-only misdemeanor cases says the entering of a plea actually occurs when?
[01:48:57.000 --> 01:48:59.000]  In an arraignment?
[01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:05.000]  No, that's for everything else.
[01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  Okay?
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  An arraignment is where the plea is taken in every other case.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  But in the Class C fine-onlys under Chapter 45, a plea is to be entered only after the jury has been impaneled for the purpose of trial,
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:29.000]  which means you're in a trial setting, which means the judge is on the bench.
[01:49:29.000 --> 01:49:34.000]  The judge is taking the plea, not the clerk.
[01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:49.000]  Okay, all right. Well, if they try to get you to enter a plea and do a trial in the same day as the initial appearance, well, they can't do that, right?
[01:49:49.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  Absolutely not.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:58.000]  It has to be in a separate proceeding, right?
[01:49:58.000 --> 01:50:05.000]  The problem here is the initial appearance does not in any way state that it is a trial setting.
[01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  It does not allow any proper preparation, especially if they've never served you with a complaint.
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:24.000]  They would be violating 45.018B immediately if they turned your initial appearance into a trial and have never served the complaint.
[01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:29.000]  Okay, all right. Well, that answers my question. Thank you.
[01:50:29.000 --> 01:50:38.000]  You're welcome. All right. We're going to go back and try Mary again. Mary, are you there?
[01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:45.000]  Hello, Mary. All right. I'm going to have to guess not.
[01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  Okay. At this point, I don't have any callers left and I've got eight minutes left. So if somebody wants to call in, please do 512-646-1984.
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  In the meantime, I will go back and continue my tarot on the rest of this.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:16.000]  Everything that the attorneys have set up is in every way violative of the Texas Constitution, the right of due process, the right to justice, the right to remedy.
[01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:37.000]  The courts, the legislature, and the executive, all controlled by attorneys, has engineered a system that is specifically designed to grant access only to those with the money to pay.
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  Therefore, it is there only for their personal enrichment, not for delivering justice to anyone, anywhere, at any time.
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:59.000]  All right. I've had a couple of callers pop back up on the board. First one up is Mark in Florida. Mark, what can we do for you?
[01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:19.000]  How are you doing, Eddie? I've got a couple of quickies for you. All right. Just to let everybody know that in case anybody had a doubt of what you said before, that the audio recordings in court get altered for pieces left out.
[01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:46.000]  So I've got audio recordings of all my, what's the word? I can't think. Anyway, all the times I've been in court, and there are definitely things missing, discussions missing, comments missing.
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:55.000]  So that's just to let everybody know out there that what you say about recording when you're in court with your own recorder is a very good idea.
[01:52:55.000 --> 01:53:09.000]  And the other thing is a quick question. Back in Stone Age, when you were a deputy sheriff, what type of driver's license were you required to have?
[01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:22.000]  Well, that's just it. The only kind I could have been required to have would have been an operator's license. But even then, the transportation code had not been recodified at that time.
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:39.000]  It was still under Vernon's annotated civil statutes where the only licenses that were considered valid in Texas under those statutes and are still the only valid licenses today is an operator's, commercial operator's or chauffeur's license.
[01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:52.000]  Anything else is a derivative of one of those three. The current iteration of the transportation code makes absolutely no mention of those licenses whatsoever.
[01:53:52.000 --> 01:54:11.000]  In fact, the only licenses defined in the term driver's license are all temporary licenses that no person domiciled in Texas can rightfully obtain except for one, and that is the occupational license.
[01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:27.000]  He would have had to have been convicted of a DUI or some other thing that would have deprived him or her of any other form of license that they were to have and substitute the occupational license for it.
[01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:36.000]  The other two are completely temporary licenses, which no one in Texas can get.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:57.000]  Here's my question. In Texas, if you are, for instance, driving a cab, you're driving commercially, driving a small delivery van or something like that, you have to have some type of chauffeur's license or something commercial, correct?
[01:54:57.000 --> 01:55:03.000]  To use the roads for business, yes.
[01:55:03.000 --> 01:55:17.000]  Why are cops required, law enforcement people, police officers required to have a commercial license? They are driving commercially.
[01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:28.000]  Yes and no. The difference between a commercial license and an operator's license is the type of equipment, not the activity alone.
[01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:37.000]  For instance, for the officer to have a commercial license here in Texas, he must be operating a motor vehicle in excess of 26,000 pounds.
[01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:50.000]  He must be carrying more than 16 passengers, including the driver and so on and so forth, or he must be driving a vehicle that bears a hazardous material placard.
[01:55:50.000 --> 01:55:58.000]  Or a school bus, which of course is the 16 passenger thing. Those are the times you have to have the commercial license.
[01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:06.000]  Otherwise, you would have the standard operator's license, which is a commercial license but not for the same type of vehicle.
[01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  What the commercial designation does is separate the class of vehicle by designation on the license.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:25.000]  Okay. I was born and raised in Missouri and like many states, they have a chauffeur's license.
[01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  If you're going to drive something under 26,000 pounds for commercial purposes, say you're delivering parts to an auto parts store around town, you're the parts runner.
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:41.000]  You're getting paid to drive. You have to have a chauffeur's license.
[01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:48.000]  Well, no, you wouldn't have a chauffeur's license because a chauffeur's license is specifically for carrying passengers.
[01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:54.000]  You're acting as a driver for less than 16 people.
[01:56:54.000 --> 01:57:09.000]  In Missouri, I can say, no, if you're driving a truck, because I did this, driving a truck under 26,000, you're required to have a chauffeur's license, not a CDL.
[01:57:09.000 --> 01:57:15.000]  Well, here it would have been an operator's license, not a CDL, but it wouldn't be a CDL.
[01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:21.000]  It would be a COL.
[01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:26.000]  Okay. Why aren't cops required to have?
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  They are. Cops are required to have an operator's license.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  Okay.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:41.000]  Because they are being paid to operate that motor vehicle on behalf of a legal entity for profit and gain.
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:42.000]  Okay.
[01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:45.000]  They are being paid to drive.
[01:57:45.000 --> 01:57:51.000]  My Texas driver's license is a driver's license. I don't dare say operator's.
[01:57:51.000 --> 01:57:55.000]  No, theirs will say driver's license, but that's my point.
[01:57:55.000 --> 01:58:02.000]  The license that you would have at that point is not identified in any Texas statute anywhere.
[01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  It does not match any of the three licenses designated in the statute as a driver's license.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  So what license actually is it?
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  Because it's not in the code. It's not in Chapter 521. It doesn't exist.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:22.000]  That's their problem.
[01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  All right, Mark, thanks for calling in. I'm at the end of the show.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:29.000]  All right, folks, this has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show.
[01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  Thank you all for calling in. Thank you all for listening in.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:35.000]  And please keep us in your financial support and prayers.
[01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:38.000]  We need you to continue to do what we do.
[01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  Please help us out whenever and wherever you can financially.
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Y'all have a great week. Good night. God bless.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:04.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.000 --> 01:59:54.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it.
[01:59:54.000 --> 02:00:02.000]  Visit logosradionetwork.com