[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily [00:06.000 --> 00:08.000] bulletins for the commodities market. [00:08.000 --> 00:21.000] Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [00:21.000 --> 00:29.000] And markets for the 13th of July 2015 opened up with gold at $1,158 an ounce, silver $15.47 an ounce, [00:29.000 --> 00:43.000] Texas crude $52.74 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $289 U.S. currency. [00:43.000 --> 00:49.000] Today in history, Tuesday July 13, 1982, Iran launches its six-year offensive against Iraq, [00:49.000 --> 00:52.000] who had been attacking them since September of 1980. [00:52.000 --> 00:59.000] All this during the Iran-Iraq War. [00:59.000 --> 01:03.000] In recent news, Operation Jade Helm 15 will commence this week. [01:03.000 --> 01:08.000] Texas counties will participate in a two-month-long multistate special operations training exercise [01:08.000 --> 01:11.000] for modern warfare, according to the military. [01:11.000 --> 01:15.000] This operation has put many on watch because documents released from the military [01:15.000 --> 01:20.000] place the states of Texas and Utah as red hostile zones in the exercise. [01:20.000 --> 01:26.000] Many concerns prompted Governor Greg Abbott to order the Texas National Guard to monitor the operation. [01:26.000 --> 01:31.000] The military insists that people volunteer their properties to be used for the training exercises, [01:31.000 --> 01:40.000] and they ensure that no one's privacy rights or civil liberties will be harmed. [01:40.000 --> 01:45.000] Infamous drug lord Chapo Guzman escaped from Mexico's most secure prison on Saturday night, [01:45.000 --> 01:51.000] a roughly one-mile tunnel 30 feet below the surface leading right into his personal shower was his method. [01:51.000 --> 01:56.000] His escape hole was not far from the military base and penitentiary in the area. [01:56.000 --> 02:02.000] It is estimated that about 379 truckloads of earth would have been needed to clear out all the dirt from the excavation. [02:02.000 --> 02:08.000] Also, the excavating power tools that would have been required to do the job would have been loud enough to hear. [02:08.000 --> 02:15.000] Alejandro Hope, a security analysis and former intelligence official in his E1 Universal column today said [02:15.000 --> 02:21.000] that the answer is one word, corruption or intimidation, or perhaps both things. [02:21.000 --> 02:24.000] Because in order to get to Chapo's personal shower, [02:24.000 --> 02:32.000] tunnelers would have needed a lot of luck or detailed knowledge of the layout of the prison, which is a state secret. [02:32.000 --> 02:39.000] This is Chapo Guzman's second banishing act, and 2001 corrupt guards played a key role in helping him escape [02:39.000 --> 02:44.000] from the Puente Grande prison in western state of Jalisco. [02:44.000 --> 02:50.000] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors, so if you have a product or a service that you'd like to advertise here, [02:50.000 --> 02:55.000] feel free to give us a call at 210-863-5617. [02:55.000 --> 03:02.000] This has been your Lowdown for July 13, 2013. [03:25.000 --> 03:35.000] Thank you for watching. [03:55.000 --> 04:01.000] For all the people to see. [04:01.000 --> 04:05.000] That just isn't one thing you should always find. [04:05.000 --> 04:09.000] You've got to saddle up your balls, you've got to draw a hard line. [04:09.000 --> 04:13.000] When the gun smoke settles, we'll sing a victory tune, [04:13.000 --> 04:17.000] and we'll all be back at the hotel soon enough. [04:17.000 --> 04:30.000] We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces, and we'll spit on my men before my horses. [04:30.000 --> 04:35.000] All right, folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show. [04:35.000 --> 04:43.000] It is the 20th of July, 2015, and we continue to roll on through this year for what that's actually worth. [04:43.000 --> 04:50.000] Now, folks, y'all know the main point of this show is to help people with whatever type of legal issues, [04:50.000 --> 04:56.000] dealing with traffic and misdemeanor stuff and things like that that they can possibly get into, [04:56.000 --> 05:04.000] and some of the due process violations and things, but I would like to take just one moment to tell you, [05:04.000 --> 05:10.000] be happy if you don't live next to the neighbor from hell, okay? [05:10.000 --> 05:14.000] We have one of those. She's been in the neighborhood maybe a couple of years, [05:14.000 --> 05:22.000] and she has dedicated herself to alienating everyone in the most hostile fashion possible. [05:22.000 --> 05:29.000] In fact, on the way out this evening, I've had my pup law dog for a little over a year now. [05:29.000 --> 05:32.000] We were on our way over to the park to Frisbee, and she's outside in the yard like, [05:32.000 --> 05:34.000] you should have your dog on a leash. [05:34.000 --> 05:39.000] I'm like, well, why? You're not on a leash or on a muzzle, and you need both. [05:39.000 --> 05:48.000] The point is this woman has called the cops for almost a dozen times for absolutely no reason, [05:48.000 --> 05:54.000] and so I'm waiting on the opportunity to catch her in the act of doing some of the things she's done on video [05:54.000 --> 05:57.000] so that I can actually press harassment charges against this woman. [05:57.000 --> 06:05.000] I don't like getting cops involved in anything, but the fact is she has made it necessary [06:05.000 --> 06:08.000] because she's constantly involving them herself. [06:08.000 --> 06:12.000] She files false police reports. They don't charge her with those. [06:12.000 --> 06:17.000] Why, I don't know, but she calls them up and she blatantly lies about whatever's going on [06:17.000 --> 06:25.000] and then just proceeds to hide in her house until she goes to work or whatever she does. [06:25.000 --> 06:31.000] Now, you may think that I'm complaining about this for no point except just a vent. That's not true. [06:31.000 --> 06:39.000] The whole point of this woman's behavior, her attitude, all of it, is this. [06:39.000 --> 06:45.000] The woman is a healthcare worker. [06:45.000 --> 06:53.000] This is the attitude and the animosity she has towards the people she has to live around in a neighborhood. [06:53.000 --> 07:03.000] Can you imagine what anyone with direct personal contact with her from a patient standpoint [07:03.000 --> 07:10.000] is being subjected to through this woman's mistreatment and hostility? [07:10.000 --> 07:16.000] Now, whether or not that's totally true, I don't know, but I cannot imagine her attitude at work [07:16.000 --> 07:21.000] being a complete opposite of the attitude she has in a neighborhood full of people. [07:21.000 --> 07:24.000] She's never even taken the time to talk to. [07:24.000 --> 07:29.000] She hasn't said a kind word to anyone in this entire neighborhood [07:29.000 --> 07:35.000] and has basically got herself completely isolated from everyone. [07:35.000 --> 07:44.000] So if you're in the Austin area, I'd be on the watch out for the way that the healthcare workers [07:44.000 --> 07:50.000] that you have to leave your friends and loved ones around and take care of and so on and so forth, [07:50.000 --> 08:00.000] keep an eye on them because if this is a sample of what you're leaving your sick, your injured, your young, your old, [08:00.000 --> 08:09.000] in the care of, it's no wonder we're having so many infant mortalities and old folks' mortalities in these homes [08:09.000 --> 08:16.000] because this level of abuse from a neighbor subjected to someone that's completely under your power, [08:16.000 --> 08:19.000] that would be something horrible to behold. [08:19.000 --> 08:25.000] Like I said, I can't say for sure that that's how she is in that environment, [08:25.000 --> 08:34.000] but I would find it very hard to believe that it's not because, like I say, no one's ever said anything bad to this woman. [08:34.000 --> 08:36.000] We've never gotten the chance. [08:36.000 --> 08:41.000] She comes in the neighborhood and in less than a month, she's already called the cops six times, [08:41.000 --> 08:45.000] six times for absolutely no reason whatsoever. [08:45.000 --> 08:51.000] Folks, we are falling apart at the seams on how we treat each other, how we interact with each other, [08:51.000 --> 08:58.000] how we look to each other to just be, even just being left alone is fine, [08:58.000 --> 09:04.000] but why do you have to be a hostile ass to get that rather than just simply say, [09:04.000 --> 09:09.000] look, buddy, I appreciate you're my neighbor and all that, but to tell you the truth, I'm not a very social individual, [09:09.000 --> 09:19.000] so just please let me just do whatever I got to do and I'll say hi or whatever, but I just prefer to be left alone. [09:19.000 --> 09:26.000] What would be wrong with that approach rather than calling the cops out of the blue for absolutely no reason whatsoever [09:26.000 --> 09:31.000] and then filing a false report about why you called them to make yourself look like the victim [09:31.000 --> 09:35.000] so you can harass your neighbors with the cops? [09:35.000 --> 09:38.000] And that's what's going on. [09:38.000 --> 09:42.000] We have to change the way that we interact with each other. [09:42.000 --> 09:46.000] We are getting separated by every little thing. [09:46.000 --> 09:49.000] What's the newest rage in separation? [09:49.000 --> 09:52.000] We're no longer dealing strictly with a race issue. [09:52.000 --> 09:57.000] Now we've given it a whole new symbol, the Confederate flag. [09:57.000 --> 10:02.000] Newsflash, folks, for those of you that haven't bothered to study any history whatsoever [10:02.000 --> 10:10.000] surrounding the basis of that flag and what it's for and why there are people that have studied history, [10:10.000 --> 10:20.000] black people that support what that flag stands for, while the ignorant in the inner cities [10:20.000 --> 10:26.000] that only want to be led around by the nose and get their free everything by the hand [10:26.000 --> 10:35.000] that's leading them down this hall of lies is telling them that that flag is all about racism [10:35.000 --> 10:41.000] when it's not, and it never was. [10:41.000 --> 10:51.000] If you listen to this show or to me in person at all, you'll find out that there are two things that I absolutely despise, [10:51.000 --> 10:55.000] liars and stupidity. [10:55.000 --> 11:00.000] And I'm getting me a t-shirt made up that says, beware. [11:00.000 --> 11:04.000] Wearer is highly allergic to liberals and stupidity. [11:04.000 --> 11:12.000] Result to either is liable to cause an outbreak of ass-whooping. [11:12.000 --> 11:14.000] And that's just the way it is. [11:14.000 --> 11:20.000] Don't bring your stupidity to me and try to force feed me what you've got when I know better. [11:20.000 --> 11:26.000] You can believe what you like, but when you start taking that belief and forcing it down other people's throat [11:26.000 --> 11:31.000] by assaulting them, threatening them, cursing them, damaging their property, [11:31.000 --> 11:36.000] you're the one that's behaving in a way that's unacceptable. [11:36.000 --> 11:42.000] And we have to learn the difference in that because right now there are too many of us that are all too willing [11:42.000 --> 11:48.000] to be swayed by any argument in any direction as long as it sounds reasonable, [11:48.000 --> 11:55.000] despite any actual evidence or proof that the reason we're being given is valid. [11:55.000 --> 12:01.000] It's the exact same problem we have in the patronut community with all these legal talking points they come up with [12:01.000 --> 12:06.000] and all this fabricated case law that doesn't have anything in it that they're saying is there [12:06.000 --> 12:11.000] and the silver bullet that they say is in there is never in there [12:11.000 --> 12:18.000] because it's as fabricated as their understanding of what's actually going on. [12:18.000 --> 12:23.000] I am not a genius. I don't know it all and I don't claim to be. [12:23.000 --> 12:30.000] But at least what ignorance remains in me is because I'm uninformed [12:30.000 --> 12:35.000] and unable to find the material that will give me the information I need. [12:35.000 --> 12:43.000] Otherwise, I spend a whole lot of my day reading, researching, dissecting and researching some more [12:43.000 --> 12:49.000] and looking for all the supporting stuff that I can find for one side of a situation or the other [12:49.000 --> 12:53.000] or one that's completely different and puts it in a better perspective. [12:53.000 --> 12:59.000] It doesn't matter to me as long as I get to the truth when it's over. [12:59.000 --> 13:07.000] But most people today don't want the truth. They want their opinion validated. [13:07.000 --> 13:13.000] It's got nothing to do with the truth. This is what I think. Don't you think so too? [13:13.000 --> 13:20.000] That's somebody wanting their opinion validated as the right one, whether it is or not. [13:20.000 --> 13:26.000] And you will know the kind of people you're dealing with when you say, well, wait a minute now. [13:26.000 --> 13:31.000] That sounds fine until you look at this and look at this and look at this. [13:31.000 --> 13:37.000] Oh, you must be a racist. You must not be very well informed. [13:37.000 --> 13:43.000] You must not think this, that or the other. It's like today. Some idiot has gone all over himself. [13:43.000 --> 13:52.000] One guy wrote an article denouncing the blowing up of the World Trade Centers [13:52.000 --> 13:58.000] and he has labeled himself in this article as an architectural expert. [13:58.000 --> 14:07.000] This one guy is going to sit there and tell 1500 professional engineers and architects [14:07.000 --> 14:13.000] that he knows more than all of them, despite him doing nothing more [14:13.000 --> 14:23.000] than spouting the same idiotic theory of fuel fire being the reason for the collapse, et cetera, [14:23.000 --> 14:27.000] and that the impact of the airplane shifted the entire weight of the building [14:27.000 --> 14:34.000] when in fact the whole reason for the design of the building was so that it could be impacted by an airplane [14:34.000 --> 14:41.000] and not suffer from that. Architectural expert, my Fanny. [14:41.000 --> 14:46.000] He is nothing more than somebody that wants attention for his opinion [14:46.000 --> 14:50.000] and wants somebody to agree with him whether it's right or it's wrong. [14:50.000 --> 14:58.000] And in this case, the science and the engineering proves he is dead wrong. [14:58.000 --> 15:03.000] But boy, you sure cannot get the naysayers to see that point of view. [15:03.000 --> 15:07.000] You cannot get them to look at the actual facts and evidence [15:07.000 --> 15:15.000] because it's only their opinion being validated that they're interested in. [15:15.000 --> 15:22.000] Now, why have I gone through all that on a show like this? It's to get to this point. [15:22.000 --> 15:28.000] If you will pay close attention to the people that are in these elected offices, [15:28.000 --> 15:34.000] you will find out that they have exactly that same mindset. [15:34.000 --> 15:39.000] How do we know this? Let's look at what they said when they were trying to get elected. [15:39.000 --> 15:48.000] I promise to do A, B, C, and D. They never tell you whether or not A, B, C, or D is constitutional. [15:48.000 --> 15:54.000] They never tell you whether or not A, B, C, or D can be done without raising any taxes. [15:54.000 --> 15:57.000] They talk about, this is what I'm going to do for you. [15:57.000 --> 16:01.000] In other words, I'm going to buy your vote by making more of these empty promises [16:01.000 --> 16:05.000] just like everybody before me has done. [16:05.000 --> 16:09.000] And then when I get elected, I'm going to pass the laws that I want [16:09.000 --> 16:14.000] and you now have to accept my opinion and validate my point of view [16:14.000 --> 16:18.000] because I made the law that makes you. [16:18.000 --> 16:22.000] It's the very same people that wanted to be validated on the outside [16:22.000 --> 16:28.000] that seek those offices to force that opinion down your throat on the inside. [16:28.000 --> 16:31.000] If you doubt it, watch what they do. [16:31.000 --> 16:37.000] Those of you that are naysayers of the Bible have to admit there are a few points in it that are valid. [16:37.000 --> 16:39.000] And one of them is this. [16:39.000 --> 16:45.000] You will know them by the fruit of their labor and their works. [16:45.000 --> 16:47.000] Look around, people. [16:47.000 --> 16:50.000] We've got people running around in the high offices of this country [16:50.000 --> 16:55.000] that shouldn't be allowed to play with matches, according to Will Rogers. [16:55.000 --> 17:00.000] Y'all hang in there, we'll be right back. [17:00.000 --> 17:06.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [17:06.000 --> 17:11.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [17:11.000 --> 17:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [17:17.000 --> 17:22.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, [17:22.000 --> 17:26.000] young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [17:26.000 --> 17:32.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [17:32.000 --> 17:37.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor, [17:37.000 --> 17:40.000] along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [17:40.000 --> 17:48.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [17:48.000 --> 17:52.000] When you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [17:52.000 --> 17:59.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [17:59.000 --> 18:01.000] Order now. [18:01.000 --> 18:06.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [18:06.000 --> 18:10.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris proven method. [18:10.000 --> 18:15.000] Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win too. [18:15.000 --> 18:21.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, [18:21.000 --> 18:26.000] what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, [18:26.000 --> 18:31.000] how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial tables on them [18:31.000 --> 18:34.000] and make them pay you to go away. [18:34.000 --> 18:39.000] The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:39.000 --> 18:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:41.000 --> 18:47.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner. [18:47.000 --> 18:50.000] Or email michaelmaris at yahoo.com. [18:50.000 --> 18:52.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com. [18:52.000 --> 19:01.000] Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [19:01.000 --> 19:11.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the logosradio network dot com. [19:11.000 --> 19:34.000] Music playing. [19:34.000 --> 19:44.000] Music playing. [19:44.000 --> 19:54.000] Music playing. [19:54.000 --> 20:07.000] Music playing. [20:07.000 --> 20:09.000] All right, folks, we are back. [20:09.000 --> 20:12.000] This is Rule of Law Radio. [20:12.000 --> 20:18.000] And the call-in number is 512-646-1984. [20:18.000 --> 20:20.000] Let's get some callers up and get in line. [20:20.000 --> 20:22.000] It looks really interesting. [20:22.000 --> 20:27.000] Now, folks, I do not have a call screener tonight, so please remember the following rules. [20:27.000 --> 20:28.000] All right? [20:28.000 --> 20:30.000] Be sure that you're not on a speakerphone. [20:30.000 --> 20:33.000] Don't be using Bluetooth or anything like that. [20:33.000 --> 20:35.000] Don't have me on any kind of speakerphone. [20:35.000 --> 20:38.000] Don't have your radio playing in the background. [20:38.000 --> 20:41.000] Or if you're listening to the show, turn the volume all the way down, [20:41.000 --> 20:46.000] because I will be coming in through both ends and then I won't be able to hear you at all. [20:46.000 --> 20:48.000] No cursing. [20:48.000 --> 20:49.000] And none of that stuff. [20:49.000 --> 20:51.000] Let's keep it as clean as possible. [20:51.000 --> 20:55.000] That way, neither you nor me will get yelled at at the end of this session. [20:55.000 --> 20:56.000] All right. [20:56.000 --> 21:03.000] That being said, our first caller tonight is Eddie in Texas for Eddie in Texas. [21:03.000 --> 21:06.000] All right, Eddie, go ahead. [21:06.000 --> 21:07.000] Yes. [21:07.000 --> 21:15.000] On June the 28th, I turned onto my block, which is my street, which is a little less than a mile. [21:15.000 --> 21:21.000] Wait, wait, wait. When you say your street's a little less than a mile, [21:21.000 --> 21:25.000] are we talking about from somewhere or in length? [21:25.000 --> 21:26.000] In length. [21:26.000 --> 21:27.000] Okay. [21:27.000 --> 21:29.000] From Doty to a dead end to my property. [21:29.000 --> 21:31.000] I turned off of Doty. [21:31.000 --> 21:37.000] He saw me, and then as soon as I passed him, he pulled in back at me, turned on his lights, [21:37.000 --> 21:42.000] and I decided, I was like, I was halfway home, half a mile from my property. [21:42.000 --> 21:48.000] So I continued to drive on the same road, approximately 25 to 30 miles an hour, [21:48.000 --> 21:53.000] and parked it in my driveway as soon as I got there. [21:53.000 --> 21:56.000] Well, when I looked to my left, he was out of his car. [21:56.000 --> 22:00.000] He had a gun pointed to my head, and he said, get out of the car. [22:00.000 --> 22:01.000] Hands in the air. [22:01.000 --> 22:02.000] Let me see your hands. [22:02.000 --> 22:04.000] Back up. [22:04.000 --> 22:05.000] Get on the ground. [22:05.000 --> 22:06.000] Get on your knees. [22:06.000 --> 22:07.000] Hands in the air. [22:07.000 --> 22:08.000] I did all that. [22:08.000 --> 22:14.000] When he comes in, Doty grabs me from behind, throws me on the ground, grabs my arm, [22:14.000 --> 22:17.000] reaches in the back of me, and says, give me your hand. [22:17.000 --> 22:18.000] Give me your hand. [22:18.000 --> 22:19.000] I need to have my arm. [22:19.000 --> 22:24.000] So he handcuffs me and tells me that I was fleeing. [22:24.000 --> 22:29.000] I never even got over 25 or 30 miles an hour, and he said I was fleeing. [22:29.000 --> 22:32.000] I had to spend 10 days in jail. [22:32.000 --> 22:35.000] I had to pay a $30,000 bond. [22:35.000 --> 22:41.000] And he also charged me with a deadly weapon, using a deadly weapon in the automobile. [22:41.000 --> 22:43.000] And there was no one on the road. [22:43.000 --> 22:52.000] So I have a district court coming up on Wednesday, and I'm curious how to overcome a motion in limiting [22:52.000 --> 22:58.000] and how to demand legal definitions and how to answer the question of how do you plead. [22:58.000 --> 23:02.000] What is the basis of the motion in limiting? [23:02.000 --> 23:05.000] Well, I've had motion in limiting. [23:05.000 --> 23:11.000] They said they limited the evidence that I could put before the jury. [23:11.000 --> 23:15.000] Yeah, and they're going to always try to do that. [23:15.000 --> 23:18.000] Are they going to try to do that in a district court? [23:18.000 --> 23:22.000] Probably, if they think they can prevent it. [23:22.000 --> 23:25.000] How do I get my stuff presented in evidence without... [23:25.000 --> 23:31.000] Well, what evidence, what stuff are you talking about, first thing? [23:31.000 --> 23:33.000] What evidence? [23:33.000 --> 23:34.000] Well, I don't know. [23:34.000 --> 23:36.000] I don't know if it's evidence yet or not. [23:36.000 --> 23:37.000] You said stuff. [23:37.000 --> 23:40.000] I'm trying to find out what that means. [23:40.000 --> 23:41.000] Okay. [23:41.000 --> 23:50.000] I have a constructive legal notice that I filed on public record, February 25, 2002. [23:50.000 --> 23:57.000] And I intend to file a common law judicial notice talking about case law, [23:57.000 --> 24:01.000] the right to travel by Shapiro versus Thompson, [24:01.000 --> 24:07.000] MoDoc versus Pennsylvania, Marbury versus Madison, you know, all those records. [24:07.000 --> 24:08.000] Okay. [24:08.000 --> 24:09.000] Can I ask a question? [24:09.000 --> 24:10.000] Can I ask a question? [24:10.000 --> 24:11.000] Sir? [24:11.000 --> 24:20.000] Where did you get this information and suggestions to do these things? [24:20.000 --> 24:21.000] Sir, I didn't hear you. [24:21.000 --> 24:28.000] Where did you get the information you're talking about and the instructions to do these things? [24:28.000 --> 24:30.000] Off of the Internet. [24:30.000 --> 24:34.000] Okay. [24:34.000 --> 24:44.000] Now, did you ever bother at any point since 2002 to do any research on any of the procedures [24:44.000 --> 24:53.000] and processes for any type of court hearing or case that supported the use of this documentation [24:53.000 --> 24:58.000] as something that you would ever be able to use in your court case? [24:58.000 --> 25:03.000] All I've done is study what I believe to be case law. [25:03.000 --> 25:07.000] But no, I have not studied further about the constructive legal notice. [25:07.000 --> 25:08.000] No, I have not. [25:08.000 --> 25:09.000] Okay. [25:09.000 --> 25:16.000] Say you have studied what you believe to be case law, explain that to me just a little bit. [25:16.000 --> 25:25.000] Well, I believe that Shapiro versus Thompson has been on public record for over 200 years. [25:25.000 --> 25:26.000] Okay. [25:26.000 --> 25:33.000] Let me try this a different way. [25:33.000 --> 25:42.000] What was the date and time that you robbed the bank down on 1st Street? [25:42.000 --> 25:44.000] That never happened. [25:44.000 --> 25:45.000] Okay. [25:45.000 --> 25:50.000] What caliber gun did you use to rob the bank down on 1st Street? [25:50.000 --> 25:53.000] That never happened. [25:53.000 --> 26:03.000] Okay. What did you use as a getaway car when you used that caliber gun to rob the bank down on 1st Street? [26:03.000 --> 26:05.000] These allegations are not true. [26:05.000 --> 26:08.000] I have never done any of the above. [26:08.000 --> 26:09.000] Right. [26:09.000 --> 26:16.000] And what do any of them have to do with the right to travel? [26:16.000 --> 26:18.000] Oh, nothing. [26:18.000 --> 26:19.000] Exactly. [26:19.000 --> 26:22.000] And that's exactly where you find yourself right now. [26:22.000 --> 26:27.000] None of what you're being charged with has a damn thing to do with the right to travel. [26:27.000 --> 26:33.000] You are going to put up a defense that is no defense at all. [26:33.000 --> 26:34.000] Really? [26:34.000 --> 26:39.000] Really, because one has nothing to do with the other. [26:39.000 --> 26:40.000] Let me ask you this question. [26:40.000 --> 26:42.000] Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. [26:42.000 --> 26:44.000] You called me, so listen for a minute. [26:44.000 --> 26:47.000] Okay. [26:47.000 --> 26:52.000] Is a truck driver someone that is acting in commerce? [26:52.000 --> 26:53.000] Yes. [26:53.000 --> 26:55.000] Really? [26:55.000 --> 26:58.000] When is he acting in commerce? [26:58.000 --> 27:00.000] If he's for hire. [27:00.000 --> 27:01.000] Okay. [27:01.000 --> 27:02.000] When is he for hire? [27:02.000 --> 27:08.000] When is he in commerce and when is he not? [27:08.000 --> 27:11.000] When he's being paid to operate a motor vehicle for hire. [27:11.000 --> 27:18.000] Okay. Does a truck driver also have the right to travel? [27:18.000 --> 27:21.000] I would believe so. [27:21.000 --> 27:24.000] As long as he's not on the clock. [27:24.000 --> 27:25.000] Right, right. [27:25.000 --> 27:26.000] Okay. [27:26.000 --> 27:33.000] So once again, how could he argue that he broke a rule associated with his occupation [27:33.000 --> 27:41.000] and his license by arguing the right to travel when it does not apply in that situation? [27:41.000 --> 27:46.000] Sure, he has the right to travel, except when he's on the clock. [27:46.000 --> 27:47.000] Right. [27:47.000 --> 27:48.000] All right. [27:48.000 --> 27:55.000] So he couldn't use that in his defense, even though his defense is directly related to being in a car, right? [27:55.000 --> 27:56.000] Yes. [27:56.000 --> 27:59.000] You aren't going to be able to use it either. [27:59.000 --> 28:08.000] It has nothing to do with the allegations, just like when I said you robbed a bank. [28:08.000 --> 28:17.000] But the initial reason for his infringing on my liberty was a turn signal violation, [28:17.000 --> 28:22.000] which the Texas DPS, I looked up their mission statement, [28:22.000 --> 28:34.000] and it says to supervise private travel, number one, and to supervise and regulate commercial or hire traffic. [28:34.000 --> 28:35.000] That's correct. [28:35.000 --> 28:38.000] The gentleman says he's supervised private travel. [28:38.000 --> 28:39.000] Okay. [28:39.000 --> 28:48.000] Again, it is supervised traffic on rural highways, not private travel. [28:48.000 --> 28:49.000] Right, rural highways. [28:49.000 --> 28:50.000] Okay, yes. [28:50.000 --> 28:51.000] Okay. [28:51.000 --> 28:58.000] And it is to supervise and regulate commercial and for hire traffic. [28:58.000 --> 28:59.000] Regulate. [28:59.000 --> 29:00.000] Right. [29:00.000 --> 29:04.000] Regulate is not in the right to travel. [29:04.000 --> 29:10.000] See, you have exactly the same argument here that you had with the bank allegation. [29:10.000 --> 29:15.000] It didn't happen, not I have a right to travel. [29:15.000 --> 29:18.000] You understand? [29:18.000 --> 29:25.000] In order for him to regulate you, they first have to prove that you are doing what? [29:25.000 --> 29:27.000] Acting in commerce. [29:27.000 --> 29:28.000] Correct. [29:28.000 --> 29:33.000] What does that have to do with the right to travel? [29:33.000 --> 29:36.000] Well, if I'm not in commerce, I have to- [29:36.000 --> 29:37.000] Whoa, whoa, whoa. [29:37.000 --> 29:41.000] That's exactly what they are arguing, that you are in commerce, [29:41.000 --> 29:46.000] and you're not refuting that in any way, shape, or form with that argument. [29:46.000 --> 29:48.000] Hang on just a second. [29:48.000 --> 29:50.000] All right, folks, we're about to take a break. [29:50.000 --> 29:53.000] 512-646-1984. [29:53.000 --> 29:54.000] We'll be right back. [29:54.000 --> 30:03.000] Y'all hang in there. [30:03.000 --> 30:09.000] A judge has imposed a lifetime driving ban on a 17-year-old boy after a serious accident [30:09.000 --> 30:12.000] to send a message about reckless driving. [30:12.000 --> 30:18.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with more on this unusually harsh punishment in a moment. [30:18.000 --> 30:20.000] Privacy is under attack. [30:20.000 --> 30:23.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:23.000 --> 30:28.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:28.000 --> 30:30.000] So protect your rights. [30:30.000 --> 30:34.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:34.000 --> 30:36.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:36.000 --> 30:39.000] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, [30:39.000 --> 30:43.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:43.000 --> 30:47.000] Start over with StartPage. [30:47.000 --> 30:52.000] 17-year-old Lyle Topa was cruising with three buddies and texting while driving. [30:52.000 --> 30:56.000] He crashed into a tree, badly injuring all four boys. [30:56.000 --> 30:58.000] One was in a coma for weeks. [30:58.000 --> 31:02.000] The judge gave him a lecture about how the roads are littered with broken futures. [31:02.000 --> 31:06.000] Then he revoked the boy's driver's license for life. [31:06.000 --> 31:10.000] What Lyle did was wrong, but at age 17, we all make mistakes. [31:10.000 --> 31:16.000] By revoking his license for life, the judge issued a virtual death sentence to his career and future. [31:16.000 --> 31:22.000] In 20 years, he'll be a husband and a dad, unable to even drive his son to a soccer game. [31:22.000 --> 31:24.000] Now that's cruel and unusual. [31:24.000 --> 31:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [31:31.000 --> 31:38.000] What are you thinking? Microplant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month. [31:38.000 --> 31:45.000] Infusa.org has 12 formulations of microplant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, [31:45.000 --> 31:49.000] liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever. [31:49.000 --> 31:53.000] It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products. [31:53.000 --> 31:58.000] That saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367. [31:58.000 --> 32:02.000] Only at infusa.org. [32:02.000 --> 32:06.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic center. [32:06.000 --> 32:08.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [32:08.000 --> 32:13.000] If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:13.000 --> 32:18.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, [32:18.000 --> 32:20.000] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:20.000 --> 32:26.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:26.000 --> 32:29.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:29.000 --> 32:34.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is [32:34.000 --> 32:36.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:36.000 --> 32:41.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:41.000 --> 32:46.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [32:46.000 --> 32:51.000] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:51.000 --> 32:55.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:55.000 --> 32:59.000] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:25.000 --> 33:27.000] Okay. [33:55.000 --> 34:00.000] All right, folks, we are back. [34:00.000 --> 34:02.000] This is Rule of Law Radio. [34:02.000 --> 34:05.000] We are still talking with Eddie in Texas. [34:05.000 --> 34:08.000] All right, Eddie, let's continue. [34:08.000 --> 34:18.000] Again, I have posted on the back of my truck, private property, not-for-profit or higher, Christian sovereign man, [34:18.000 --> 34:23.000] and that is on the tailgate of my truck, and it's on the video. [34:23.000 --> 34:30.000] So is that public notice to him that I have claimed my lawful rights? [34:30.000 --> 34:36.000] You can put anything you want in your window, but if he still had... [34:36.000 --> 34:48.000] Okay, let me explain the logic behind why such a sign all by itself is not evidence of anything, nor is it a shield. [34:48.000 --> 34:55.000] Let's say you're coming up from Tijuana with a 500-pound bell of marijuana tied up in the back of your truck. [34:55.000 --> 35:06.000] You've got a sign in your window that says, coastal hay, not for sale or for hire, but it's quite evident that it's actually marijuana. [35:06.000 --> 35:07.000] Okay? [35:07.000 --> 35:14.000] Doesn't matter what you're calling it, they're going to act on what they believe it to be. [35:14.000 --> 35:18.000] You follow? [35:18.000 --> 35:19.000] Okay. [35:19.000 --> 35:20.000] All right. [35:20.000 --> 35:28.000] So the issue here is, regardless of the sign that you've put in the window, what do you have on the back bumper? [35:28.000 --> 35:32.000] On the back tailgate, I have private property. [35:32.000 --> 35:33.000] No. [35:33.000 --> 35:34.000] Not-for-profit. [35:34.000 --> 35:35.000] No. [35:35.000 --> 35:36.000] Higher. [35:36.000 --> 35:37.000] No. [35:37.000 --> 35:38.000] Access to the tailgate. [35:38.000 --> 35:39.000] No. [35:39.000 --> 35:40.000] My check. [35:40.000 --> 35:41.000] No. [35:41.000 --> 35:44.000] The bumper, not your tailgate. [35:44.000 --> 35:46.000] I have a tag. [35:46.000 --> 35:47.000] A what? [35:47.000 --> 35:49.000] A Texas license plate. [35:49.000 --> 35:51.000] Thank you. [35:51.000 --> 35:55.000] So you have conflicting messages, don't you? [35:55.000 --> 35:57.000] Yes. [35:57.000 --> 36:14.000] The license plate, being a license, gives him at least reasonable suspicion, not probable cause, but reasonable suspicion that you are in violation of the transportation code. [36:14.000 --> 36:15.000] Okay. [36:15.000 --> 36:23.000] So your argument is you were never engaged in transportation or any other commercial use of the highways. [36:23.000 --> 36:27.000] It's not I have a right to travel. [36:27.000 --> 36:32.000] That is an oil and water argument, an accusation, and a defense. [36:32.000 --> 36:35.000] They will not mix. [36:35.000 --> 36:36.000] Oh, okay. [36:36.000 --> 36:40.000] I was not engaged in commerce is the argument. [36:40.000 --> 36:41.000] Correct. [36:41.000 --> 36:47.000] I was not engaged in transportation or any other commercial use of the highways. [36:47.000 --> 36:48.000] Okay. [36:48.000 --> 36:49.000] Okay. [36:49.000 --> 36:54.000] Are you charged under what code or at least some of it under what code? [36:54.000 --> 36:55.000] Oh, I'm not sure. [36:55.000 --> 36:58.000] The evading is penal code. [36:58.000 --> 37:02.000] Well, actually, in this case, you're not being charged with anything at all under the transportation code. [37:02.000 --> 37:07.000] So you're not even going to get to use that as a defense. [37:07.000 --> 37:09.000] The only thing that you can. [37:09.000 --> 37:10.000] No driver's license. [37:10.000 --> 37:11.000] What? [37:11.000 --> 37:13.000] And no registration. [37:13.000 --> 37:15.000] They charged you with that? [37:15.000 --> 37:16.000] Yes. [37:16.000 --> 37:20.000] And he's going to testify that was his basis for coming after you? [37:20.000 --> 37:21.000] Yes. [37:21.000 --> 37:22.000] Okay. [37:22.000 --> 37:24.000] And where do you live? [37:24.000 --> 37:26.000] Palm Beach Creek. [37:26.000 --> 37:27.000] No, I didn't ask what street. [37:27.000 --> 37:28.000] I'm not from. [37:28.000 --> 37:30.000] What city? [37:30.000 --> 37:31.000] Oh, Conroe, Texas. [37:31.000 --> 37:32.000] Okay. [37:32.000 --> 37:40.000] You need to be getting some friends and making a road trip up here to my class because every Sunday we or at least most Sundays, [37:40.000 --> 37:44.000] we will do some form of mock trial dealing directly with these charges. [37:44.000 --> 37:50.000] There are two ways to fight these charges, the not in transportation and on the merits. [37:50.000 --> 37:52.000] Right now. [37:52.000 --> 37:53.000] Merits. [37:53.000 --> 37:54.000] Merits. [37:54.000 --> 37:57.000] That's going to the elements of the actual charge. [37:57.000 --> 37:58.000] Okay. [37:58.000 --> 37:59.000] I understand. [37:59.000 --> 38:05.000] Now, if you can defeat the elements of the actual initial reason for the arrest, [38:05.000 --> 38:11.000] then you can show that his arrest of you in the first place was unlawful, [38:11.000 --> 38:14.000] which makes everything else fruit of the poison tree. [38:14.000 --> 38:19.000] But you have to challenge the arrest as being unlawful. [38:19.000 --> 38:20.000] I already have. [38:20.000 --> 38:22.000] How did you already have? [38:22.000 --> 38:27.000] When I put it on the public internet. [38:27.000 --> 38:28.000] Wait, wait, wait. [38:28.000 --> 38:32.000] Whatever you're on, you're breaking up because you're being either too loud or too excited. [38:32.000 --> 38:33.000] Slow down. [38:33.000 --> 38:37.000] Speak directly into whatever you're on. [38:37.000 --> 38:45.000] I went and requested a public information form, and on there it had type of incident, [38:45.000 --> 38:49.000] and I put unlawful arrest. [38:49.000 --> 38:54.000] You're looking for public information on unlawful arrest from who for what? [38:54.000 --> 38:55.000] No. [38:55.000 --> 39:01.000] I requested a public information form, and on the information form it asked your name, [39:01.000 --> 39:08.000] and then it has a place that says type of incident, and I put unlawful arrest, [39:08.000 --> 39:14.000] and I intend to charge you in court for kidnapping and false imprisonment. [39:14.000 --> 39:15.000] Okay. [39:15.000 --> 39:16.000] Wait, wait, wait. [39:16.000 --> 39:18.000] Because I requested a decimating trial. [39:18.000 --> 39:21.000] Wait. [39:21.000 --> 39:31.000] Please explain to me how an information request form gives you any ability to do what you're describing. [39:31.000 --> 39:32.000] Oh, no. [39:32.000 --> 39:34.000] I'm not saying that gives me the ability. [39:34.000 --> 39:41.000] I'm saying that that is the initial, the first time that I've cited unlawful arrest. [39:41.000 --> 39:43.000] I haven't filed any other documents. [39:43.000 --> 39:52.000] Okay, look, that information form is you requesting some record from them. [39:52.000 --> 39:53.000] Right. [39:53.000 --> 39:57.000] What record did you ask for? [39:57.000 --> 40:01.000] The video, the audio, the arrest report. [40:01.000 --> 40:03.000] Well, here's your problem. [40:03.000 --> 40:04.000] They're going to deny that. [40:04.000 --> 40:06.000] They shouldn't, but they're going to. [40:06.000 --> 40:09.000] I guarantee you they're going to. [40:09.000 --> 40:12.000] They're going to deny the video and audio tape? [40:12.000 --> 40:14.000] Didn't I just say that? [40:14.000 --> 40:16.000] Yeah. [40:16.000 --> 40:17.000] Okay. [40:17.000 --> 40:26.000] In this case, what you file is a motion for discovery and compulsory production of that information. [40:26.000 --> 40:28.000] And compulsory production, okay. [40:28.000 --> 40:34.000] A motion for discovery and compulsory production. [40:34.000 --> 40:36.000] You're going to have to file that with the court. [40:36.000 --> 40:40.000] The court's going to have to rule on it, and the court's going to have to tell them, turn it over. [40:40.000 --> 40:42.000] Okay. [40:42.000 --> 40:44.000] But now you need to understand something. [40:44.000 --> 40:47.000] They're trying to charge you with a felony. [40:47.000 --> 40:49.000] You understand that, right? [40:49.000 --> 40:51.000] Yeah, yes. [40:51.000 --> 40:57.000] You understand the hazards of going into this without somebody that knows what the hell they're doing at the helm, don't you? [40:57.000 --> 40:59.000] Yes. [40:59.000 --> 41:01.000] Do you feel that somebody is you? [41:01.000 --> 41:05.000] Well, I'm going to try. [41:05.000 --> 41:06.000] I'm not sure how. [41:06.000 --> 41:13.000] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Are you willing to try for 5 to 10 years? [41:13.000 --> 41:17.000] I don't have any other choice. [41:17.000 --> 41:21.000] Why don't you have another choice? [41:21.000 --> 41:22.000] What can I do? [41:22.000 --> 41:30.000] It's called a public defender, and then what you have to do is learn how to control the public defender. [41:30.000 --> 41:32.000] They don't have any public defenders. [41:32.000 --> 41:34.000] They have court-appointed attorneys. [41:34.000 --> 41:37.000] That's what a public defender is. [41:37.000 --> 41:41.000] Okay. [41:41.000 --> 41:47.000] Well, actually, public defenders, they're not appointed by the court. [41:47.000 --> 41:49.000] They are already at work. [41:49.000 --> 41:51.000] They do that as their job. [41:51.000 --> 42:00.000] No, the court appoints an attorney to a case for a defendant. [42:00.000 --> 42:03.000] They become a public defender. [42:03.000 --> 42:04.000] Okay. [42:04.000 --> 42:05.000] Okay. [42:05.000 --> 42:09.000] Texas, unlike other states, don't have permanent public defenders. [42:09.000 --> 42:18.000] All of them are private attorneys. [42:18.000 --> 42:27.000] I've understood that if you accept a public defender or a court-appointed attorney, that you cannot challenge jurisdiction. [42:27.000 --> 42:28.000] Is that true? [42:28.000 --> 42:33.000] That's not true, but your attorney will generally waive the attempt to do that. [42:33.000 --> 42:38.000] That's what I mean about you learning how to control your attorney. [42:38.000 --> 42:49.000] The first thing these attorneys do is attempt to waive a lot of your rights that either have been or will be violated so that you have no appealable error on those violations. [42:49.000 --> 42:51.000] That's the first thing they're going to do. [42:51.000 --> 42:58.000] They're going to waive your right to notice. They're going to waive your right to reject the charging instrument. [42:58.000 --> 43:02.000] They're going to waive your right to challenge impersonal jurisdiction. [43:02.000 --> 43:07.000] They're going to waive all of it unless you learn how to control them. [43:07.000 --> 43:08.000] Listen up. [43:08.000 --> 43:09.000] Okay. [43:09.000 --> 43:11.000] Unless you learn how to control them. [43:11.000 --> 43:13.000] There's two ways to do this. [43:13.000 --> 43:22.000] You can do it by leaving them in charge of everything, but bar grieving them for every single thing they do wrong. [43:22.000 --> 43:34.000] Or you can demand that they be relegated to advisory chair, which is second chair, only while you handle the case and they give you legal advice. [43:34.000 --> 43:39.000] They will never do either one of them to the fullest extent possible. [43:39.000 --> 43:46.000] But at least you don't get your rights waived out of the blue for no reason. [43:46.000 --> 43:48.000] Okay. [43:48.000 --> 43:50.000] So which process would you? [43:50.000 --> 43:52.000] All right. Hang on, Eddie. I got to take another break. [43:52.000 --> 43:55.000] And I want to finish up with you on the other side because I got other callers. [43:55.000 --> 44:00.000] All right, folks. Y'all hang in there. We will be right back. [44:00.000 --> 44:03.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [44:03.000 --> 44:07.000] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary. [44:07.000 --> 44:15.000] The affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [44:15.000 --> 44:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [44:19.000 --> 44:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [44:23.000 --> 44:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [44:28.000 --> 44:34.000] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:34.000 --> 44:43.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:43.000 --> 44:52.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [44:52.000 --> 45:01.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [45:01.000 --> 45:07.000] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, [45:07.000 --> 45:13.000] and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas. [45:13.000 --> 45:19.000] I'm Brave New Books and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [45:23.000 --> 45:31.000] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [45:31.000 --> 45:38.000] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. [45:38.000 --> 45:44.000] That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. [45:44.000 --> 45:54.000] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com. [46:14.000 --> 46:33.000] All right, folks, we are back. [46:33.000 --> 46:40.000] This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in numbers 512-646-1984. [46:40.000 --> 46:45.000] All right, let's wrap this up, baby, so I can get to these other callers waiting in line here. [46:45.000 --> 46:47.000] Okay, just two more questions. [46:47.000 --> 46:53.000] How do I demand the legal definition of the words that they use? [46:53.000 --> 47:01.000] You, well, the first thing is you've got to get those definitions into the record through testimony or judicial notice. [47:01.000 --> 47:04.000] But what definitions are you referring to? [47:04.000 --> 47:09.000] Like driver, license. [47:09.000 --> 47:11.000] And why would you want those? [47:11.000 --> 47:14.000] Why would you want those? [47:14.000 --> 47:18.000] Because I'm not a driver. [47:18.000 --> 47:22.000] I'm enjoying private property as a right. [47:22.000 --> 47:28.000] Okay, what definition of driver are you going to try to throw out there? [47:28.000 --> 47:29.000] Black's law. [47:29.000 --> 47:35.000] No, no, that's your first mistake right there, and it will be fatal. [47:35.000 --> 47:36.000] Oh, okay. [47:36.000 --> 47:37.000] Okay? [47:37.000 --> 47:38.000] Oh, really? [47:38.000 --> 47:44.000] The statute has its own definition of driver, and that will be the one they use, not Black's. [47:44.000 --> 47:46.000] Okay, okay. [47:46.000 --> 47:54.000] Will that statute incriminate me if I say show me the law that says I have to have a driver's license? [47:54.000 --> 47:57.000] It would refer to commerce, right? [47:57.000 --> 48:02.000] No, it refers to transportation because that's the code it's under. [48:02.000 --> 48:07.000] Oh, okay, transportation, which is transporting goods for hire. [48:07.000 --> 48:08.000] Really? [48:08.000 --> 48:12.000] Where did you get that definition? [48:12.000 --> 48:16.000] I assume the transportation was... [48:16.000 --> 48:19.000] I don't care what you're assuming. [48:19.000 --> 48:23.000] You're assuming is not admissible in court. [48:23.000 --> 48:26.000] Agreed. [48:26.000 --> 48:30.000] So how do I argue this statute doesn't apply to me? [48:30.000 --> 48:33.000] Well, that would be the problem you're facing, wouldn't it? [48:33.000 --> 48:40.000] And that's got way more time than I'm going to have to do on this show to tell you that. [48:40.000 --> 48:46.000] So you need to be making arrangements to come to the Sunday class and participate heavily. [48:46.000 --> 48:47.000] Okay, I will. [48:47.000 --> 48:48.000] I'll try. [48:48.000 --> 48:49.000] One more question. [48:49.000 --> 48:52.000] How do I answer their question of how do you plead? [48:52.000 --> 48:54.000] You don't. [48:54.000 --> 49:00.000] You don't ever enter a plea, but you also do not ever refuse. [49:00.000 --> 49:05.000] You simply state, I cannot enter a plea as no evidence or information relating to the [49:05.000 --> 49:07.000] accusations have been presented to me. [49:07.000 --> 49:10.000] I cannot in good conscience enter a plea at this time. [49:10.000 --> 49:16.000] Is the court willing to compel an unconscionable plea from me or enter an unconscionable plea [49:16.000 --> 49:20.000] on my behalf and waive my rights against my will? [49:20.000 --> 49:22.000] Because here's the problem. [49:22.000 --> 49:26.000] The entering of a plea waives several fundamental rights. [49:26.000 --> 49:30.000] It waives the right to personal jurisdiction challenges. [49:30.000 --> 49:34.000] It waives the right to challenge the charging instrument. [49:34.000 --> 49:40.000] It waives way too much, including the right to notice. [49:40.000 --> 49:42.000] Okay. [49:42.000 --> 49:46.000] So if they want to argue we're going to enter it for you, you object to those rights being [49:46.000 --> 49:49.000] waived against your will. [49:49.000 --> 49:51.000] Okay. [49:51.000 --> 49:52.000] Okay. [49:52.000 --> 49:54.000] I object to those rights being waived against my will. [49:54.000 --> 49:56.000] I cannot enter a plea. [49:56.000 --> 49:58.000] Why? [49:58.000 --> 50:00.000] I just told you why. [50:00.000 --> 50:01.000] I'm writing it down. [50:01.000 --> 50:03.000] I didn't get it all. [50:03.000 --> 50:10.000] You never enter a plea because it waives your right to notice, to challenge personal [50:10.000 --> 50:16.000] jurisdiction, and to challenge the form and substance of the charging instrument and the [50:16.000 --> 50:19.000] underlying complaint. [50:19.000 --> 50:22.000] Okay. [50:22.000 --> 50:24.000] Great. [50:24.000 --> 50:29.000] I have not been informed of the elements of the charge against me. [50:29.000 --> 50:34.000] You haven't been served with a complaint and a charging instrument for the charges against [50:34.000 --> 50:39.000] you so that you can be duly apprised of the nature and cause. [50:39.000 --> 50:43.000] Therefore, you're not going to waive the rights I just told you about. [50:43.000 --> 50:47.000] But I have been served with a complaint and an information. [50:47.000 --> 50:49.000] You have? [50:49.000 --> 50:50.000] Yes. [50:50.000 --> 50:52.000] Okay. [50:52.000 --> 50:54.000] And? [50:54.000 --> 50:58.000] They're saying that I ran something. [50:58.000 --> 51:03.000] And when did they serve you with the complaint and information? [51:03.000 --> 51:06.000] I requested it. [51:06.000 --> 51:08.000] And I haven't. [51:08.000 --> 51:09.000] What was the other one? [51:09.000 --> 51:10.000] Wait, wait, wait. [51:10.000 --> 51:12.000] When did this happen? [51:12.000 --> 51:15.000] June 28. [51:15.000 --> 51:19.000] And when did you request copies of this? [51:19.000 --> 51:23.000] I went down to the district court and got copies. [51:23.000 --> 51:26.000] I said when, not where. [51:26.000 --> 51:28.000] Three days ago. [51:28.000 --> 51:29.000] Three days ago. [51:29.000 --> 51:39.000] And when do these documents say they were signed? [51:39.000 --> 51:46.000] Let me find them here. [51:46.000 --> 51:51.000] It says it was signed June the 29th. [51:51.000 --> 51:52.000] Okay. [51:52.000 --> 51:56.000] Which was seven days after the incident, right? [51:56.000 --> 51:59.000] No, one day. [51:59.000 --> 52:00.000] Okay. [52:00.000 --> 52:05.000] So it happened on the 28th and they filed the complaint and information on the 29th? [52:05.000 --> 52:06.000] Yes. [52:06.000 --> 52:07.000] Okay. [52:07.000 --> 52:09.000] Where's the indictment? [52:09.000 --> 52:10.000] I haven't seen it. [52:10.000 --> 52:11.000] They didn't have one. [52:11.000 --> 52:14.000] That's because they haven't got one yet. [52:14.000 --> 52:17.000] Right. [52:17.000 --> 52:19.000] Does that have to be from the grand jury? [52:19.000 --> 52:20.000] Yes, it does. [52:20.000 --> 52:22.000] And how do I get to the grand jury? [52:22.000 --> 52:25.000] You don't unless they call you. [52:25.000 --> 52:26.000] From the judge? [52:26.000 --> 52:31.000] How can you think that I don't have a right to the grand jury to complain of a fault? [52:31.000 --> 52:34.000] You have a right to go to them and make a complaint about anything. [52:34.000 --> 52:39.000] But that doesn't mean they're going to call you in to determine whether or not they're going to indict you. [52:39.000 --> 52:42.000] The grand jury is not a trial. [52:42.000 --> 52:45.000] Their job is not to decide guilt or innocence. [52:45.000 --> 52:49.000] The job of the grand jury is one thing and one thing only. [52:49.000 --> 53:00.000] Do the facts, circumstances, and evidence create enough of a possibility of probable cause that this guy is guilty of committing this crime? [53:00.000 --> 53:03.000] If so, indict. [53:03.000 --> 53:05.000] Right. [53:05.000 --> 53:06.000] Okay, I agree. [53:06.000 --> 53:09.000] I hope they don't because it's silly. [53:09.000 --> 53:10.000] I did not. [53:10.000 --> 53:15.000] Well, as the saying goes, a good prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich for anything. [53:15.000 --> 53:18.000] Uh-huh. [53:18.000 --> 53:19.000] All right, Eddie. [53:19.000 --> 53:20.000] Man, I appreciate it. [53:20.000 --> 53:21.000] You're welcome. [53:21.000 --> 53:23.000] Good luck. [53:23.000 --> 53:24.000] Thanks again, man. [53:24.000 --> 53:25.000] Thank you very much. [53:25.000 --> 53:26.000] Yes, sir. [53:26.000 --> 53:27.000] All right. [53:27.000 --> 53:29.000] Now we're going to go to Jeff in Mississippi. [53:29.000 --> 53:30.000] Jeff, what can I do for you? [53:30.000 --> 53:36.000] And please don't make me go suck down a crate of migraine medicine. [53:36.000 --> 53:37.000] Hey, Eddie. [53:37.000 --> 53:38.000] Thanks for having me on the show. [53:38.000 --> 53:40.000] Yes, sir. [53:40.000 --> 53:45.000] And I probably pulled the same stunt about four years ago. [53:45.000 --> 53:49.000] I was the guy that said that he was going to go into court the next day and claim to be a sovereign citizen. [53:49.000 --> 53:51.000] Uh-huh. [53:51.000 --> 53:55.000] He started yelling and screaming at me and told me not to do that. [53:55.000 --> 53:57.000] And how did that turn out? [53:57.000 --> 54:00.000] I did a year in the Mississippi Penitentiary. [54:00.000 --> 54:04.000] But that was based on what? [54:04.000 --> 54:08.000] Originally, I had a rifle on the campus of the university. [54:08.000 --> 54:09.000] No, no, no. [54:09.000 --> 54:15.000] It's based upon the fact that the judge and the prosecutor did not follow the law in that state. [54:15.000 --> 54:17.000] Isn't that correct? [54:17.000 --> 54:18.000] Yes. [54:18.000 --> 54:19.000] You shouldn't have been in jail. [54:19.000 --> 54:22.000] It had nothing to do with you being a sovereign anything. [54:22.000 --> 54:28.000] The law itself protected you in what you did, and they threw the law out the window. [54:28.000 --> 54:30.000] Uh-huh. [54:30.000 --> 54:40.000] So my question tonight is I'm going to sue another college, not Mississippi State, but Arkansas State. [54:40.000 --> 54:45.000] And I called in a couple of weeks ago about writing a demand letter. [54:45.000 --> 54:50.000] I have that letter written, and I've got remedy stated. [54:50.000 --> 54:59.000] The person that I had the, that I dealt with at the college was the provost, which I guess is kind of like a dean. [54:59.000 --> 55:07.000] When I write my demand letter, do I write the letter to that man, the provost, and demand money from him? [55:07.000 --> 55:08.000] No. [55:08.000 --> 55:17.000] You write it to the dean of the college, naming that individual as the one that perpetrated the act that gives you the cause of action. [55:17.000 --> 55:19.000] Okay. [55:19.000 --> 55:21.000] And what about the remedy? [55:21.000 --> 55:25.000] Everything's in the same letter going to the same person. [55:25.000 --> 55:31.000] Okay. So please kindly submit $5,000 to myself. [55:31.000 --> 55:34.000] Well, I'm not sure you're going to state it just like that. [55:34.000 --> 55:40.000] You can simply state my expectation is to be made whole, and this is how I expect to be done. [55:40.000 --> 55:44.000] And you can name whatever your terms are as far as being made whole. [55:44.000 --> 55:48.000] As long as they consider it reasonable, maybe they'll pay it. [55:48.000 --> 55:49.000] Got it. [55:49.000 --> 55:56.000] You know, you've got to tell them here's how I was harmed, here's what I can, how I will seek my remedy. [55:56.000 --> 56:01.000] This is how I will accept you making me whole without me seeking that other remedy. [56:01.000 --> 56:04.000] Got it. [56:04.000 --> 56:05.000] Okay. To the dean of the college. [56:05.000 --> 56:06.000] That's all I got, Eddie. [56:06.000 --> 56:07.000] I'll let you move on. [56:07.000 --> 56:08.000] All right. [56:08.000 --> 56:09.000] Enjoy. [56:09.000 --> 56:10.000] Thank you. [56:10.000 --> 56:11.000] Good luck. [56:11.000 --> 56:12.000] All right. Bye. [56:12.000 --> 56:13.000] Bye-bye. [56:13.000 --> 56:14.000] All right, folks. [56:14.000 --> 56:18.000] Just in case you missed it, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number. [56:18.000 --> 56:20.000] Now we're going to go to Ralph in Texas. [56:20.000 --> 56:27.000] Ralph, I've got two and a half minutes, so we'll get you started, and I'll stop you when we come to the break. [56:27.000 --> 56:29.000] Okay, Eddie, I appreciate it. [56:29.000 --> 56:31.000] I want to get your opinion on a few things. [56:31.000 --> 56:35.000] I'm finally getting an examining trial, or at least they're telling me so. [56:35.000 --> 56:43.000] So what I want to know is if the state's witness, which is the arresting officer, if he does not show for the examining trial, [56:43.000 --> 56:46.000] would that mean the charges have to be dropped? [56:46.000 --> 56:51.000] Yeah, because the purpose of the examining trial, according to the code, is this. [56:51.000 --> 57:00.000] To take all witness testimony into the record, it has to be written down and reviewed by both the prosecutor and the defense for accuracy. [57:00.000 --> 57:03.000] Both of them have to sign off on it. [57:03.000 --> 57:12.000] All evidence that's going to be attempted to be used must be submitted to the court for review to determine whether or not it's admissible and allowed in the case. [57:12.000 --> 57:24.000] Then when actual trial comes up, you can use any of the statements made at the examining trial to impeach any different testimony at the actual trial. [57:24.000 --> 57:26.000] Okay, well that raises another question. [57:26.000 --> 57:30.000] How will I know what he said at the examining trial without a court of record? [57:30.000 --> 57:38.000] Because I just told you, in an examining trial, everything from both sides is required to be written down. [57:38.000 --> 57:40.000] Oh, I'm sorry. I missed that. Okay. [57:40.000 --> 57:46.000] Go read Chapter 16 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on Examining Trials. [57:46.000 --> 57:49.000] Chapter 16, okay. [57:49.000 --> 57:53.000] Okay, I'm working on a complaint. I haven't quite finished it yet. [57:53.000 --> 57:59.000] Okay, well hang on. We're at the top of the hour break and I won't be able to hear everything and neither will the audience over the music. [57:59.000 --> 58:03.000] So hold on and we'll pick you up on the other side when we come back, okay? [58:03.000 --> 58:05.000] Okay, good. [58:05.000 --> 58:10.000] All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio's Monday night show. I am your host, Eddie Craig. [58:10.000 --> 58:16.000] We got one more hour left in this little fiasco we call entertainment law here. [58:16.000 --> 58:25.000] Y'all listen in. Call in if you have a question, query, response, or just want to complain about something that I'm doing or not doing. [58:25.000 --> 58:28.000] Just let us hear from you, whatever you got. [58:28.000 --> 58:50.000] 512-646-1984 is the call-in number and I will be right back in a couple of minutes to continue on. [58:50.000 --> 58:58.000] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.000 --> 59:06.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [59:06.000 --> 59:09.000] Enter the recovery version. [59:09.000 --> 59:18.000] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.000 --> 59:28.000] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.000 --> 59:33.000] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.000 --> 59:47.000] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:47.000 --> 59:50.000] That's freestudybible.com. [59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:21.000] The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing your daily bulletins for the commodities market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:43.000] And markets for the 13th of July, 2015, opened up with gold at $1,158 an ounce, silver, $15.47 an ounce, Texas crude, $52.74 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $289 U.S. currency. [01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:59.000] Today in history, Tuesday, July 13, 1982, Iran launches its six-year offensive against Iraq, who had been attacking them since September of 1980, all this during the Iran-Iraq War. [01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:20.000] In recent news, Operation Jade Helm 15 will commence this week. Texas counties will participate in a two-month-long multi-state special operations training exercise for modern warfare, according to the military. This operation has put many on watch because documents released from the military place the states of Texas and Utah as red hostile zones in the exercise. [01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:40.000] Many concerns prompted Governor Greg Abbott to order the Texas National Guard to monitor the operation. The military insists that people volunteer their properties to be used for the training exercises, and they ensure that no one's privacy rights or civil liberties will be harmed. [01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:56.000] Infamous drug lord Chapo Guzman escaped from Mexico's most secure prison on Saturday night. A roughly one-mile tunnel 30 feet below the surface, leading right into his personal shower, was his method. His escape hole was not far from the military base and penitentiary in the area. [01:01:56.000 --> 01:02:08.000] It is estimated that about 379 truckloads of earth would have been needed to clear out all the dirt from the excavation. Also, the excavating power tools that would have been required to do the job would have been loud enough to hear. [01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:21.000] Alejandro Hope, a security analysis and former intelligence official in his E1 Universal column today, said that the answer is one word, corruption or intimidation, or perhaps both things. [01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:32.000] Because in order to get to Chapo's personal shower, tunnelers would have needed a lot of luck or detailed knowledge of the layout of the prison, which is a state secret. [01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:44.000] This is Chapo Guzman's second banishing act. In 2001, corrupt guards played a key role in helping him escape from the Puente Grande prison in western state of Jalisco. [01:02:44.000 --> 01:02:55.000] The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors, so if you have a product or a service that you'd like to advertise here, feel free to give us a call at 210-863-5617. [01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:02.000] This has been your Lowdown for July 13, 2015. [01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:52.000] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking with Ralph in Texas. All right, Ralph, continue on. [01:03:52.000 --> 01:04:03.000] Okay, I'm going over my criminal complaint, and I'm wondering if I should use words like, I was kidnapped or I was taken against my will. [01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:07.000] Okay, what was the original – what is the complaint? [01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:10.000] The complaint is aggravated kidnapping. [01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:15.000] No, no, no, not yours against them. What are they charging you with? [01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:22.000] Oh, what are they charging me with? They're charging me with failure to identify and evading arrest using a vehicle. [01:04:22.000 --> 01:04:35.000] Okay. So, all right, let's see. I thought they had addressed the evading part already and dropped it, but no? [01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:49.000] I'm just going to – well, see, I just had a – the court point attorney just had a motion to withdraw her in the district court, and he had been telling me that they were going to drop that. [01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:55.000] The one time I talked to him, he said they were going to drop that, that there was nothing there, but then it's a motion sharing for him to withdraw. [01:04:55.000 --> 01:05:04.000] The prosecutor said, yes, Your Honor, they were going for the felony evading as soon as the grand jury meets this Wednesday. [01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:05.000] Okay. [01:05:05.000 --> 01:05:06.000] But I don't know – [01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:10.000] And why did your attorney motion to withdraw? [01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:12.000] Because I bargained with him. [01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:15.000] And did you let him withdraw? [01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:27.000] No. I adamantly thought it, and I argued with the judge for 30 minutes over it. I couldn't believe he put up with me as long as he did, but it was – it was a sham proceeding. [01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:46.000] I was going to tell you about it in a minute. The highlights of this, he said that it was a courtesy to me that the VA gave me – allowed me to have a court-appointed attorney in this misdemeanor because the felony was pending. [01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:58.000] And I said, well, then the record needs to reflect on the order that the court-appointed attorney is asking to withdraw in the felony, not the misdemeanor. [01:05:58.000 --> 01:06:05.000] So we went back and forth for a while. Then he said that the court-appointed attorney has nothing to do with the misdemeanor. [01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:10.000] He never did have, and he doesn't want to talk about the misdemeanor in his court. [01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:16.000] He wasn't being rude when he said it. He said, I'm just not here to hear anything about the misdemeanor. [01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:22.000] Yeah, because the misdemeanor is below his court's level to hear. [01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:32.000] But he said, you have not been indicted, but the prosecutor wanted you to have this attorney because you were going to eventually be indicted. [01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:41.000] Right. But again, they're two separate charges under two different jurisdictions. The misdemeanor, the district court is for the felonies. [01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:50.000] County courts, county courts at-laws are for anything above class Cs. Justice and municipal are for any class Cs. [01:06:50.000 --> 01:07:00.000] They are the courts of original jurisdiction for those levels of offense. He couldn't hear anything on the misdemeanor if he wanted to. [01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:09.000] But my question was, who is the court-appointed attorney? Is he my attorney in the felony that I haven't been indicted on yet? [01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:19.000] Or is it that I never asked for? Or is he the court-appointed attorney that I put a motion for in the misdemeanor? [01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:23.000] Well, I don't know. Did you get the judge to clarify? [01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:32.000] I asked him several times, and every time I asked him, one direction or the other, depending on how I said it, he would go one direction, then he would go the other. [01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:42.000] He said, I'm not here to discuss the misdemeanor. He said that the attorney is for the misdemeanor because as a courtesy, I was going to be facing a felony. [01:07:42.000 --> 01:07:45.000] So they went ahead and let me have him. [01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:58.000] Right. See, logic says, from what you're telling me, that the attorney had the responsibility to appear for the misdemeanor since he was appointed to you without an indictment having been had. [01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:07.000] Right. And that's what he told me. He told me that, well, he just talked about the felony. This is the one time I talked to the attorney for an hour. [01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:15.000] He talked a little bit about the felony, but he didn't say that he was the attorney for it. And he said that he could beat the misdemeanor. [01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:21.000] It was like really no-brainer. The only problem would be if the jury doesn't follow the law. He said because by the law, you have it. [01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:29.000] Right. And then the judge is saying this last Friday that the attorney never was my attorney in the misdemeanor. [01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:51.000] And then the prosecutor got up and said something, which I found very interesting. She said, Your Honor, the reason we put the court-appointed attorney in there was because we were hoping that it was for him to bring a deal to save going to the grand jury for an indictment. [01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:56.000] He was supposed to make a deal on all of it. And that's why he was there. [01:08:56.000 --> 01:09:02.000] Well, yeah. Was there a surprise in there somewhere? [01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:10.000] Well, the surprise was that they actually made the words out where somebody could see them. You know what I'm saying? They actually said the words out loud. [01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:11.000] Yeah. [01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:14.000] We put him in there to strike a deal, you know, because it's all well and good. [01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:21.000] Yeah. He's actually working for us, Judge. So that's why we gave the courtesy of having him. [01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:34.000] Now, two other interesting things happened at the district court. And I don't know why, but I looked to my wife, and there was a court-appointed attorney standing at the next table. [01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:48.000] He had moved back two foot and was up against the railing. And he had his arms to his side, but his lower part of his arm and his wrists were up, and he was pointing at me. [01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:58.000] Now, normally, I would say, you know, Judge, I'd like to make a note here that the attorney's pointing at me or somebody. I'd like to find out what's going on before we proceed. [01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:06.000] But I didn't. And then a few minutes later, I looked over my left shoulder, and there's the bailiff, a big woman. [01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:13.000] She is standing a half a step behind me and a half a step to my left. If I had moved my elbow, I would have hit her in the face. [01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:22.000] Quite intimidating. I don't know if that's why he was pointing at me or what, but I do know he spent 30 minutes talking to the bailiff before we had the hearing. [01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:32.000] So the reason I'm bringing that up, there's two reasons. One, it's interesting, and two is my upcoming motion for Zanley file. [01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:39.000] I'm told it's going to be held at the district court. I objected when the judge told me that. [01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:46.000] I said, you've got a facility right there. I've already seen it. You've got a room. You've got chairs. What is the problem with that? [01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:49.000] Oh, well, all of us judges are doing that, she said. [01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:59.000] Because the examining trial is on the record. It has to be in a place where they have the recording equipment and the transcriptionist and everything. [01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:10.000] Okay. All right. Okay. Well, all right. Okay. All right. I went through the trouble of getting this. [01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:19.000] Government Code, Step Chapter C, Section 27.051, Terms of Court, Place for Holding Court. [01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:29.000] B, each justice shall hold the regular term of court at the justice's office at times prescribed by the commissioner's court. [01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:33.000] That's what I was going to use. Yeah, but a justice is not a district judge. [01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:43.000] A justice is a JP who only has Class C hearing ability. That's for the misdemeanor. [01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:48.000] It's got nothing to do with the district court for the examining trial. [01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:52.000] No, no. The examining trial is in the misdemeanor court. [01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:57.000] No, that's not possible. Let me put it this way. [01:11:57.000 --> 01:12:06.000] That is supposed to be true for every misdemeanor and felony if the arrest was done without a warrant, absolutely required to be done. [01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:10.000] Because there they have to make two determinations of probable cause. [01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:19.000] The first one is, was the arrest without warrant lawful and legal? Until that is determined, everything else is a moot point. [01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:26.000] Unless, of course, the arrest, the argument against the arrest being lawful is waived. [01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:31.000] And then they can pursue the actual allegations. [01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:36.000] Well, is the indictment come after or before an examining trial? [01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:43.000] The indictment has to come after, and they'll do that for the felony. [01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:49.000] Okay, right. Exactly. So we're still in the misdemeanor, Class C misdemeanor. [01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:52.000] No, you're assuming. What did I just tell you? [01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:57.000] The examining trial for the felony has to occur before the indictment. [01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:04.000] Because what is learned after the examining trial determines probable cause to proceed. [01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:09.000] If there is none, there won't be an indictment. [01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:13.000] That's why the examining trial is being done. [01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:16.000] I'm the one requesting the examining trial. [01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:23.000] And you're supposed to. What is your point? It still has to be done prior to the indictment. [01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:29.000] I'm requesting it through the Justice of the Peace Court in my Class C misdemeanor. [01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:33.000] I filed it there, and I haven't filed anything. [01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:40.000] Okay, I can almost guarantee you they're not going to do an examining trial in the JP court. [01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:44.000] Well, I wouldn't be surprised if they don't, but they're telling me they will. [01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:55.000] If they do, great. But you need to read Chapter 16 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to make sure that's exactly what they're doing. [01:13:55.000 --> 01:14:06.000] I put the motion in, and via a phone call, two phone calls today, the judge, I told the judge, I actually told the clerk, [01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:09.000] I said, y'all have been telling me for six months I have a court-appointed attorney. [01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:13.000] And I found out Friday by district judge I have never had a court-appointed attorney. [01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:16.000] So I'm going to have my hearing now. [01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:19.000] That clerk said, are you giving me an error? I said, yes, ma'am, I am. [01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:25.000] I want an examining trial, and all my motions heard Thursday the 30th. [01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:27.000] And she said, are you giving me an order? I said, yes. [01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:32.000] So she says, I'll have to check. I said, you don't have to check for anybody. That's your job. [01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:36.000] She kept on and kept on. So what they did was they called the prosecutor, [01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:40.000] which is what they've been doing the whole time, to find out if they should really do this or not. [01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:49.000] But they finally agreed on – they tried to give me August 26. We finally agreed on July the 29th, next Wednesday. [01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:58.000] And I talked to the prosecutor, and I talked to the prosecutor's office, and I'm going to call again tomorrow and verify. [01:14:58.000 --> 01:15:04.000] Okay. Here is your problem. I have a feeling you're being hoodwinked. [01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:09.000] And I have another feeling that you don't see it coming. [01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:16.000] And here's why I say that. You're being charged with both a felony and a misdemeanor. [01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:24.000] According to the way the courts in Texas are doing it, even though it violates the Code of Criminal Procedure and your due process rights, [01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:35.000] the courts of Texas are ruling and supporting the idea that you only get an examining trial in a felony, not a misdemeanor. [01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:45.000] And most prosecutors are avoiding the ability of the defense to even get the examining trial by running outside of their county [01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:53.000] and getting an indictment from a completely different grand jury before an examining trial can be had. [01:15:53.000 --> 01:16:01.000] And then the courts turn around and say, well, if an indictment is already done, then the examining trial is a moot point. [01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:07.000] It's a runaround. So here's what I think they're doing. And you don't realize it. [01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:15.000] The prosecutor, which I presume from your description is liable to be the same one prosecuting you for the felony. [01:16:15.000 --> 01:16:22.000] Okay. They let you get the examining trial done. [01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:37.000] In their mind, they're doing everything related to the felony, realizing and knowing ahead of time that you're dealing only with the misdemeanor and not the felony. [01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:45.000] Hang on and I'll finish this on the other side. But you think about that for a minute and see if you can understand where I'm going when we get back. [01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:52.000] All right, folks, call in number 512-646-1984. We're going to take a break. We'll be right back. [01:16:52.000 --> 01:17:01.000] And then we'll get this wrapped up with Ralph and continue on. [01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:09.000] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. [01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:15.000] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals. [01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:19.000] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. [01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:24.000] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists. [01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. [01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.000] In addition, we carry popular longevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polynbers. [01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:39.000] We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale and more. [01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:46.000] We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment. Call us at 512-646-6440. [01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:51.000] We're located at 7304 Burnet Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. [01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. [01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:00.000] Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440. [01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:07.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:12.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:18:12.000 --> 01:18:18.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:26.000] In a world where natural fruits have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:32.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:40.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:48.000] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:52.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:59.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000] Order now. [01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:23.000] This is the Logos Logos Radio Network. [01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:38.000] Alright, folks, we are back. [01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:42.000] This is Logos Radio, and we are currently talking with Ralph in Texas. [01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:46.000] Alright, Ralph, let's continue on with how I see this transpiring. [01:19:46.000 --> 01:19:51.000] As I'm saying, you're going through this thinking that it's all about the misdemeanor. [01:19:51.000 --> 01:19:55.000] That's all you're asking questions and getting evidence into the record about. [01:19:55.000 --> 01:20:05.000] Meanwhile, they're sitting over there letting you do all this stuff in relation to the misdemeanor while doing absolutely nothing in relation to the felony. [01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:08.000] Then comes the trial on the felony. [01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:17.000] You're denied an examining trial because you've already had one. [01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:21.000] See how that's going to play out? [01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:25.000] That's not bad for me, I'm sure, but no, I'm not sure how it's going to play out. [01:20:25.000 --> 01:20:30.000] No, I said do you see how that's going to play out? [01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:37.000] Well, no, I don't, because there's no, I'm not sure how I would get an examining trial if I don't have a case number. [01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:42.000] Because there is no case until the examining trial is done. [01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:44.000] That's the point. [01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:55.000] The purpose of the examining trial is to determine whether or not probable cause exists to go and get an indictment for the felony. [01:20:55.000 --> 01:21:00.000] Well, maybe I should go ahead and ask for an examining trial in the felony. [01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:02.000] No, you're asking for the examining trial. [01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:05.000] You do everything relating to both while you're there. [01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:15.000] The problem is do you know how to get the evidence and information in required for both of them? [01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:24.000] Because the examining trial works just like a real trial, minus a jury and minus a ruling that throws you in jail. [01:21:24.000 --> 01:21:32.000] Right, but you told me how to question the witness to get the evidence, [01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:37.000] which is the black letter law, which states you have to arrest somebody before you finish on the trial. [01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:40.000] Yeah, but that's for the misdemeanor. [01:21:40.000 --> 01:21:43.000] You still have to get in, wait, wait, wait, let me finish. [01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:52.000] You still have to get in the association that the evading is not possible if the arrest was unlawful. [01:21:52.000 --> 01:21:55.000] Right, and I don't know how to do that. [01:21:55.000 --> 01:22:02.000] But he never, well, that's what I'm telling you, if you don't know how to do that, that's why you needed that attorney. [01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:06.000] But obviously, this particular attorney was doing his best to throw you under the bus [01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:10.000] and was working for the other side from the very beginning. [01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:13.000] Which the next one will as well. [01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:20.000] The prosecutor said that we'll give him another attorney today at the motion withdrawal hearing, [01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:23.000] but the judge says no, he hasn't been indicted yet. [01:22:23.000 --> 01:22:25.000] I'll tell you what, we're just going to wait on that. [01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:28.000] If he gets indicted, then we'll go ahead and give him an attorney. [01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:31.000] Then you should have objected right there. [01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:35.000] Objection, Judge, in a felony case, I have the right to an examining trial. [01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:39.000] I need assistance of counsel at that examining trial. [01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:47.000] And that examining trial has to take place prior to the indictment. [01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:50.000] Hmm, I surely didn't do that. [01:22:50.000 --> 01:22:59.000] Okay, all right, so if I give the prosecutor written notice that the judge is, you know, [01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:05.000] going to hold a hearing on my examining trial, if that's what I get, or the motion withdrawal, [01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:10.000] or the Brady motion, or anything else I have in the class A misdemeanor, [01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:14.000] wouldn't that kind of limit the prosecutor's office to saying, [01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:17.000] okay, well, we're going to be here, there, or wherever we're going to be, [01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:22.000] but we're not going to be able to do the felony because this notice clearly states [01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:26.000] it's got the class A misdemeanor cause number on it, [01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:31.000] so wouldn't that limit them to what they do whenever we have them hearing? [01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:34.000] No, no, Ralph, it wouldn't. [01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:36.000] Uh-oh, I'm in trouble. [01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:39.000] Are you not listening to what I'm telling you? [01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:43.000] They have already rigged a system where the examining trial [01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:47.000] is not available to you for the damn misdemeanor. [01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:53.000] This is a setup from the word go. [01:23:53.000 --> 01:23:59.000] Is that not sinking in? [01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:07.000] I guess it's starting to sink in, but what I'm thinking is that whether it's an examining trial [01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:16.000] or the trial, this is the misdemeanor, once that is dismissed or tried, [01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:21.000] I don't see how they can, anyway, once it's dismissed... [01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:28.000] Because they can claim at that point that the evading is not related to the failure to identify. [01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:35.000] See, the issue here is still the fact that you were pulled over in a traffic stop, okay? [01:24:35.000 --> 01:24:38.000] That's problem one. [01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:43.000] During the traffic stop, he decided not to charge you with anything related to traffic. [01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:50.000] He decided to charge you with evading and the failure to identify. [01:24:50.000 --> 01:24:53.000] You follow? [01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:54.000] Yes. [01:24:54.000 --> 01:25:00.000] So they don't have to relate it to each other to make it stick. [01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:05.000] What you have to prove is that the original stop from the very beginning, [01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:13.000] prior to either charge, was illegal and unlawful. [01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:19.000] That is the only way you can negate them both. [01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:24.000] Otherwise, you may beat the Class C, but that's not in any way going to prevent them [01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:27.000] from coming after you for the felony. [01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:32.000] Because all they have to do is claim they're not related to each other. [01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:37.000] They can say, well, we were trying to place him under arrest for the traffic violation, [01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:41.000] he locked himself in his car, and then he wouldn't get out, [01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:47.000] he wouldn't give his information, and they charged him with failure to ID. [01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:49.000] Well, wait, all right, hang on a second. [01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:52.000] The complaint says the opposite. [01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:55.000] What do you mean the complaint says the opposite? [01:25:55.000 --> 01:26:02.000] The complaint says that he warned me that if I did not identify myself, [01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:07.000] he would place me under arrest for failure to identify. [01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:14.000] And that has what to do with what I just said about the felony evading. [01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:21.000] He still can make the argument that he was also potentially going to arrest you for something else, [01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:32.000] even though he hadn't yet, which that's not going to invalidate the evading. [01:26:32.000 --> 01:26:34.000] Well, Eddie, I don't know. I'm at a loss. [01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:38.000] Well, I'm trying to tell you all the kinds of crap they can pull here. [01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:41.000] I understand you're at a loss. That's the problem. [01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:49.000] They set this up in ways that people aren't seeing them coming. [01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:56.000] But if they're willing to acquiesce to an examining trial for this misdemeanor, I smell a rat. [01:26:56.000 --> 01:26:58.000] Okay. [01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:05.000] Well, I asked them for a motions hearing, and they came back and said it would be the trial on August the 26th. [01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:09.000] And I said, no, I have motions, pre-trial motions. [01:27:09.000 --> 01:27:13.000] Maybe I should just go ahead and go with the hearing, I mean, the trial and be done with it, [01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:17.000] because the judge is not going to agree with me on anything. [01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:20.000] In fact, I think she threatened me on the phone today. [01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:28.000] We were arguing, and she says, if you get any more problems, we'll let you come over here. [01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:33.000] Why are you talking to the judge on the phone about your case? [01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:37.000] Because Clark hands the judge to me, and the judge gets on the phone. [01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:41.000] Okay. Well, now both of you are in trouble. [01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:53.000] It is illegal in Texas for a judge in a criminal case to have an ex parte communication dealing with that case with either party to the case. [01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:57.000] Well, some courts don't have clerks, and the judge takes the place of the clerk. [01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:04.000] That does not negate the legality of what the judge is doing. [01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:08.000] Now, am I talking about the case if I'm asking for a hearing? [01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:13.000] Are you dealing with any of the facts relating to the case, the charges themselves? [01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:15.000] No, absolutely not. [01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:16.000] Okay. [01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:17.000] No. [01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:18.000] All right. [01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:22.000] As long as you're not discussing the facts of the case, that much you can get by with. [01:28:22.000 --> 01:28:28.000] The closest I've come to discussing the real case other than hearing is saying, I don't have a court appointed attorney. [01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:30.000] You keep telling me I do, but I don't. [01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:33.000] That's the closest we've gotten to talking about the nuts and bolts of the case. [01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:34.000] Okay. [01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:35.000] It's not very close at all. [01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:46.000] Okay. I'm going to have to go over this tape and listen to it and concentrate and focus on it and find out which direction to take because I thought I had a direction. [01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:47.000] You have a direction. [01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:49.000] The problem is it's not a safe one. [01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:51.000] It's not a guaranteed one. [01:28:51.000 --> 01:29:01.000] The only thing that will protect you on both charges is to prove the officer's initial stop itself was unlawful. [01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:12.000] Okay, but can you – I don't know how much time you have and how much time it would take, but how can I prove that a stop for a seatbelt, just a stop for a seatbelt violation, was unlawful? [01:29:12.000 --> 01:29:14.000] They do this all the time. [01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:16.000] I thought it was lawful for them to stop. [01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:23.000] Were you – are you a driver engaged in transportation using a motor vehicle? [01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:26.000] Not then, not before, and not since. [01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:29.000] Well, then how can it be applicable in the stick? [01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:31.000] That's the problem. [01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:34.000] But now if you produced all the accouterments, there's a whole other problem. [01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:39.000] And I can still tell you how to do it, but I'm not going to have time to do it on the show. [01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:44.000] But there is a way to get the entire transportation code thrown out as unconstitutional. [01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:46.000] It's actually quite simple. [01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:52.000] If they actually follow the Constitution and the law, it's very simple. [01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:53.000] All right, hang on. [01:29:53.000 --> 01:30:02.000] I'll be right back. [01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:04.000] Cover up that tattoo. [01:30:04.000 --> 01:30:09.000] The FBI is building a database that analyzes body art as a way of identifying people. [01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:11.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:16.000] I'll have details on the weird new program the Fed's called Tattoo Recognition in a moment. [01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:27.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:28.000] So protect your rights. [01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:32.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:35.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:38.000] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:30:38.000 --> 01:30:42.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:46.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:49.000] Iris patterns, email records, cell phone coordinates. [01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:52.000] The FBI is collecting data on us all. [01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:57.000] Now the Feds want images of tattoos as a way of knowing who we are and what we might do. [01:30:57.000 --> 01:31:02.000] Tattoo recognition is part of the Next Generational Identification Program [01:31:02.000 --> 01:31:06.000] that identifies Americans beyond fingerprints and mugshots. [01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:11.000] Tattoo symbols are collected by the FBI's Biometric Center of Excellence, [01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:17.000] a one-stop shop of biometric data from voice patterns to footprints to hand geometry. [01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:22.000] Needless to say, this is one more step towards the establishment of a total surveillance state. [01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:25.000] What's next, microchips for us all? [01:31:25.000 --> 01:31:32.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:37.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:39.000] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:47.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:50.000] And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying. [01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:56.000] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:59.000] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:59.000 --> 01:32:02.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:02.000 --> 01:32:04.000] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. [01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:07.000] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:10.000] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, [01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:12.000] but good luck getting them to pay for it. [01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:15.000] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:18.000] That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements [01:32:18.000 --> 01:32:22.000] can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:27.000] And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. [01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:33.000] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [01:32:33.000 --> 01:32:39.000] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:43.000] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 [01:32:43.000 --> 01:32:46.000] to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:51.000] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.000] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:02.000] May not actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:12.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:38.000] All right, folks, we are back. [01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:40.000] We're still talking with Ralph here. [01:33:40.000 --> 01:33:46.000] And wouldn't you know, my browser decided to go curse-splash. [01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:51.000] Give me just a second, and let me get this back up and going here. [01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:54.000] That's going to be one of them evenings closer to the end of the show [01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:56.000] when I need things to work and they're not going to work. [01:33:56.000 --> 01:34:00.000] All right. [01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:03.000] Sorry, Ralph, I can't bring it back on unless my caller page is working, [01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:06.000] and it's not working if my browser's froze, so I'm having to restart it. [01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:11.000] So hang on here just a second while we get that done. [01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:13.000] All right. [01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:15.000] There we go. [01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:20.000] All right, Ralph, let's continue on. [01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:24.000] Hello, Ralph. [01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:30.000] And now we've got a whole other issue. [01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:31.000] I'm here. [01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:32.000] All right. [01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:33.000] There we go. [01:34:33.000 --> 01:34:34.000] All right. [01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:35.000] It finally came back. [01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:36.000] All right. [01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:37.000] I'm on? [01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:38.000] Yeah. [01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:39.000] You can hear me? [01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:40.000] Yes. [01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:41.000] All right. [01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:44.000] So I'm wondering if I don't say I'm going to have time to make it to one of your classes [01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:50.000] between now and next Wednesday, so maybe if you've got some time, [01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:55.000] hopefully tomorrow I can call you, get a private conference going. [01:34:55.000 --> 01:34:58.000] That'll be fine if you'll send me an email with your phone number. [01:34:58.000 --> 01:35:00.000] I'll give you a call. [01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:01.000] Okay. [01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:05.000] One last question before you go on to someone else who you can help out. [01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:06.000] All right. [01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:12.000] I had two board grievances returned to me because I did the whole thing myself, [01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:16.000] and they're sending it back saying I have to use the form. [01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:21.000] So I don't like the form because it asks for your employer. [01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:24.000] You don't have to put all that information on there. [01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:29.000] Put on only enough for them to know that you're making the complaint. [01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:32.000] No garbage lives, state of birth, so I just put N.A. [01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:34.000] Just leave it blank or what? [01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:38.000] I'd put none of your business. [01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:43.000] I guess that'll work for me then because I thought I'd get somebody's opinion on it [01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:46.000] before sending it back and having them return it to me. [01:35:46.000 --> 01:35:51.000] Yeah, the fact that they want you to give them information doesn't mean you have to. [01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:52.000] Right. [01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:54.000] Well, they're not going to get it from me. [01:35:54.000 --> 01:36:01.000] I may, you know, we may ping upon it back and forth a few times to find out what they are going to get. [01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:08.000] But anyway, yeah, I can send you an email with my phone number this evening, [01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:16.000] and hopefully anytime tomorrow I do need to go get my complaint, my criminal complaint against them. [01:36:16.000 --> 01:36:21.000] I need to go get it notarized because it's got to be emailed to the prosecutor. [01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:28.000] Well, in that email, Ralph, send me any documents you've got from this at the same time. [01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:31.000] Any documents I got from this arrest? [01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:37.000] Yeah, like your complaint and your information and things of that nature. [01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:42.000] I'm going to need to read that in order to give you proper information. [01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:43.000] Okay. [01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:46.000] Also have the complaint, but I will send it to you. [01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:47.000] Okay. [01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:48.000] Thank you, Eddie. [01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:49.000] You're welcome. [01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:50.000] You have a good night. [01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:51.000] Okay. [01:36:51.000 --> 01:36:52.000] All right. [01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:55.000] Now we're going to go to Aaron. [01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:59.000] Aaron, are you out there? [01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:05.000] Aaron Karshner. [01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:07.000] Hello, hello. [01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:11.000] Check your mute button. [01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:12.000] All right. [01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:18.000] I don't have Aaron answering, so we will come back in a little bit. [01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:24.000] Dean Sandstorm, are you there? [01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:25.000] I am here. [01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:26.000] All right. [01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:27.000] Can you hear me, Eddie? [01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:28.000] I can. [01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:29.000] What do you got? [01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:31.000] Hey, how are you doing? [01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:35.000] Hey, can I have a question about expert witnesses? [01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:37.000] Okay. [01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:39.000] Okay. [01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:42.000] How do you get one? [01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:52.000] Well, you basically have to get someone that's qualified as an expert witness in the area that you're going to examine them on in relation to the facts of the case involved. [01:37:52.000 --> 01:37:57.000] Yeah, well, hey, let me ask you, would you qualify as an expert witness? [01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:04.000] Probably not if they can help it, what is the area of expertise you are seeking? [01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:05.000] I'm sorry? [01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:09.000] What is the area of expertise you are seeking? [01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:12.000] Police policies and procedures. [01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:13.000] Nope. [01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:20.000] The only one that can do that is someone within the actual police agency because it's their policy and procedure. [01:38:20.000 --> 01:38:38.000] I would have to be employed by them in order to do that and it would have to be my job to write it or interpret it or to teach it before I would be able to be qualified as an expert on it. [01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:54.000] Now, the only other person you can get is someone that does – the only way you can get that is if you can get someone that's got decades of doing this in various departments, then or someone at a national level that does it across state lines. [01:38:54.000 --> 01:39:02.000] Those are the kind of peoples that they would accept as an expert witness on individual police policies. [01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:17.000] Right, because I'm involved in a federal case, 1983, deprivation of rights, and going through discovery and I'm at a loss. [01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:26.000] Honestly, that's the reason I called you to see if I could ask anybody and I figured you're pretty well versed in this field about obtaining an expert witness. [01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:32.000] I've been looking for some time now and, of course, we've got like – [01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:39.000] Yeah, the only one you're going to be able to get for that purpose is either someone – it doesn't even have to be a cop. [01:39:39.000 --> 01:39:49.000] It just has to be someone that that's their job, is something relating to standardized policies and procedures among police departments. [01:39:49.000 --> 01:40:00.000] It can be law professors, for instance. Does the police policy and procedure comply with the law as written and is interpreted by the federal courts and blah, blah, blah? [01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:07.000] Those are the kinds of people you're going to need to seek out as an expert witness if you're going across policies. [01:40:07.000 --> 01:40:26.000] If you're going for one specific departmental policy, then you need to get the chief of that department or you need to get someone that's responsible for the writing, teaching, and interpreting of that policy, someone preferably out of the human resources department. [01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:44.000] Well, would it be someone that is employed by – these would usually be most of the expert witnesses that I've been looking at in terms of their background are generally, oh, I was the police chief of some town in Florida and now – [01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:58.000] Yeah, but if you're asking a Florida cop about proper policy in, say, Montana, he's not an expert on what the policy in Montana is or the state laws that go with it unless he's actually done the same thing there. [01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:00.000] You see the difference? [01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:15.000] Sure. Well, there's a couple of guys in New York, because I'm in New York and looking for an expert witness in the York area, and I just thought, oh, geez, you know, maybe you would have some experience out of here having litigated. [01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:18.000] Not in New York? [01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:33.000] Yeah. Well, maybe you could – because I would thought that you would have qualified to be an expert witness having won experience in the profession. I believe you're an author. Have you authored? [01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:41.000] I've authored a book. It's not a – it's an electronic form of the book, but I'm working on a second one that I'm hoping to have physically published, yes. [01:41:41.000 --> 01:41:50.000] But you have to remember what the qualifications of an expert witness is. They either have to have the full training on a specific subject. [01:41:50.000 --> 01:42:06.000] Usually they are preferred that they have a degree in that subject and that they have at least an extensive number of years of experience or they're the go-to person on the subject and considered the foremost expert on it. [01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:16.000] Right. Like, for example, in this particular case, one of the expert witnesses that we'll be using is an expert in medical. [01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:17.000] Right. [01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:36.000] This is not a very – let's see, how can I place this? This is not someone that would be at the level of psychiatrist even. This is someone that would be at the level of psychologist and moderately published, but would qualify as an expert witness. [01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:57.000] Yeah, but see, the general – let me give you an example. Hang on, Dave. Let me give you an example. You said it's medical. That's not true. That's a generality. Because by that definition, you're a psychologist, you could try to get them qualified as an expert witness on internal medicine because that's also medical. [01:42:57.000 --> 01:43:06.000] See, they're only going to be allowed to be an expert in their specific qualified field of the medical. [01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:08.000] Yes, correct. [01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:28.000] Now, the difference there is the medical is pretty standard nationwide with only a few state exceptions. Law enforcement, that's not necessarily true. There are huge variances in policies and procedures even within the same state going from city to city. [01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:40.000] Right, right, because the whole – the purpose of the expert witness is to be able to bring someone in to counter – I hear music coming up. [01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:45.000] Yeah, we're about to take a break, so hang on just a second and we'll pick this up on the other side, okay? [01:43:45.000 --> 01:44:00.000] All right, folks, we are coming up into our last segment. We still got callers on the board. Aaron, if you're out there listening, I'm going to need you to pick up next time I call your name or I'm going to have to move on to our last caller after I get done with Dean. So y'all hang in there. We'll be right back. [01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:19.000] You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics? Boring! Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve? What? If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity. Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age. [01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:30.000] I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television. Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope. [01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:43.000] The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover, and because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested. [01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:54.000] So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com. [01:44:54.000 --> 01:45:00.000] Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning. [01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:15.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:28.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:02.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:22.000] All right, folks, we are now in our last segment of the show. We're going to try to wrap this up with Dean. [01:46:22.000 --> 01:46:32.000] Okay, Dean, let me get this out real clear. I cannot be an expert witness in New York. Dean? [01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:36.000] Very good, but would you qualify to be an expert witness there in Texas? [01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:43.000] On certain subjects, they could certainly try to get me qualified for it, absolutely. [01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:50.000] Well, I say you get yourself qualified and give them hell, Eddie, and thank you for your help, and let's get on to the next call, my friend. [01:46:50.000 --> 01:46:53.000] All right, Dean, you have a good night, and thanks for calling. [01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:54.000] Yes, thank you. [01:46:54.000 --> 01:47:02.000] Yes, sir. All right, one more time, Erin Karschner, are you there? [01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:15.000] Hello, Erin, last call. Going once, twice, sold at auction. All right, Lisa in Texas, what can we do for you? [01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:20.000] Hey, Eddie, it's Lisa, the cab driver, now ex-cab driver. [01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:23.000] Ah, how are you doing? I haven't seen you in a while. [01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:29.000] I haven't been able to go to classes in a while, but I'm still listening wherever I can and follow everything. [01:47:29.000 --> 01:47:41.000] I've got a court appearance tomorrow, and I wanted to cover a couple of last-minute things that might be an issue. I'm not sure. [01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:49.000] One is I don't have the copy of my original traffic ticket with me. [01:47:49.000 --> 01:48:04.000] I've got a copy that they printed out when I went to see the clerk because the ticket that I had, I kept in like a messenger bag kind of thing, and it got stolen. [01:48:04.000 --> 01:48:09.000] So I didn't have a copy of the regular ticket. Do you think that's going to be a problem? [01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:17.000] No, because that's what they're going to have is either the copy that was given to them or whatever, but can you read it? [01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:25.000] Yes, it's very readable. It's got everything. It's two pieces of paper, front and back. [01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:30.000] Yeah, your copy is not the original anyway. The cop has the original. [01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:45.000] Okay, good. All right. And I answered that question. And one of the arguments I'm going to use is Transportation Code 708.105. [01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:47.000] Yep. [01:48:47.000 --> 01:48:51.000] I'm in a movie car right now, so that's... [01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:55.000] Let me ask you this first. What's the charge? [01:48:55.000 --> 01:48:59.000] You're going to laugh using a cell phone. [01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:04.000] Okay. Well, that's an ordinance. What's the Transportation Code got to do with that? [01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:13.000] Well, I got a ticket for it, so I figured the ticket has to comply with... [01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:18.000] Well, it does. If it's for a moving violation in a car, it's got to comply. [01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:25.000] But here's the problem. That only applies to moving violations in the Texas Transportation Code, which that ordinance isn't. [01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:32.000] However, there is a different problem with the ordinance. It's in Title 12 of the Austin City Code. [01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:43.000] The Austin City Code in 12-3 says very plainly that title applies to government-owned and operated vehicles, not to anybody else. [01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:45.000] Okay, Title... [01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:49.000] Title 12 of the Austin City Code, 12-03. [01:49:49.000 --> 01:49:53.000] 12-03 is the Austin City Code. And I can find that online? [01:49:53.000 --> 01:50:01.000] Yes, it'll take some searching. You're actually going to get someplace called Muni Base or something like that. [01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:05.000] That's where the code's actually published online. [01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:13.000] But I've actually got the original enactment of the code from the City Council, and it's in Title 12. [01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:19.000] And Title 12 right in the very beginning says it applies to government-owned and operated vehicles. [01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:22.000] Title 12, Section... [01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:26.000] That is the title and section, 12-03. [01:50:26.000 --> 01:50:27.000] 12-03. [01:50:27.000 --> 01:50:29.000] Or 12-3, sorry. [01:50:29.000 --> 01:50:37.000] 12-3. Okay. All right. I'm going to look that up as soon as I get in front of a computer here in about an hour or so. [01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:47.000] And I might end up emailing you late tonight. I know you stay up to all hours, but... [01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:51.000] That's fine. Just hit me up if you can't find it. [01:50:51.000 --> 01:50:57.000] If you'll send me an email as soon as you can, I'll send you the information I have on it. [01:50:57.000 --> 01:51:01.000] Okay. Okay. All right. I'll try that. [01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:02.000] Okay. [01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:04.000] All right. Thanks, Eddie. [01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:12.000] You're welcome. All right. Now we're going to try one more time. Aaron, are you there? [01:51:12.000 --> 01:51:20.000] Still no Aaron. All right. Let's go to Marshall in Washington. Marshall, what can we do for you? [01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:26.000] Good evening. I'm looking for a study group around the Seattle, Washington area. [01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:28.000] Okay. [01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:30.000] Any suggestions? [01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:37.000] I have none as of yet. When my website's up and running, they'll be real easy to find if there are any that wants to set up a group there. [01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:43.000] But as of right now, I don't know of any active study groups. [01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:46.000] Okay. I guess that'll do it. Thank you for your time. [01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:48.000] You're welcome. [01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:53.000] All right. That eliminates all the callers except for Aaron, who isn't there. [01:51:53.000 --> 01:51:59.000] Are you Aaron? Aaron? [01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:03.000] Nope. All right. We'll give up on that one for tonight. [01:52:03.000 --> 01:52:17.000] All right, folks. Let's get back to what I was talking about at the beginning of this about how we need to start treating each other and how we need to start watching out for those people in power that have no clue how to treat each other because all they're looking for is power and validation. [01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:20.000] That's a dangerous combination. [01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:26.000] Validate my thoughts and ideas and therefore increase my power over you and others. [01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:31.000] That's what's happening, and that's what's going on in the world, and we need to stop doing that. [01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:51.000] And right along hand in hand with that, let's stop giving power to stupid people. Let's stop making stupid people famous. Okay? And giving them a toehold on getting into the lives of our kids, our living rooms through television. [01:52:51.000 --> 01:53:03.000] Stop watching that brain shriveling drivel on the idiot tube. It's not the boob tube anymore. That's what you call it when you're staring at the Playboy Channel. [01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:12.000] All the rest of it is the idiot box. It's called that for a reason. It is there to make you dumber than a box of rocks. [01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:21.000] Stop accommodating them. Okay? Please, for your own sake and the future of all of us, stop doing that. [01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:28.000] All right. We've got somebody else has jumped up on the caller board here. I'm going to see if I can get this right. [01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:36.000] John Elanwisky. John, are you there? [01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:40.000] Hello, John. [01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:46.000] All right. Well, that's so far not that they're up, but no answers. [01:53:46.000 --> 01:54:00.000] Okay. So, and in case you haven't noticed, there are plenty of people like this I'm talking about, like Kanye West and his wife with the buffalo butt. [01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:14.000] Okay? Just stupid people. Why are we making these people famous and rich? Why are we giving them the power to influence anybody? [01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:24.000] They haven't got the collective brain power it would take to run a hamster wheel. Why are we giving them popularity and power to go with it? [01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:32.000] Why are we giving them a stage to destroy what is good in anything? [01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:39.000] We need to start thinking for ourselves and stop being led around by the obviously ignorant. [01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:49.000] The problem is, is the way that we're being educated and trained to think we are the ignorant. [01:54:49.000 --> 01:55:02.000] So, it becomes very hard to differentiate between that which we believe to be true and that which is completely false because they are being taught to us as the same thing. [01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:11.000] Okay? Yeah, it's completely false, but I need you to believe it's true because the way I want to run this thing only works if I can convince you to believe that it's true. [01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:22.000] Okay? It's the same kind of scam you used to run on your kid brother when you were convincing him that if he let you break the candy bar in half and you broke the bigger piece off with your left hand, [01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:31.000] that if you bit the end off of it until they were equal in size that you both had gotten a fair share of the candy when you finally hand him his half. [01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:44.000] Okay? Just think about this. What is completely sad is that there are a number of young children in this country that are more intelligent than the adults running it. [01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:55.000] They have more logic. They have more capable reasoning power and the ability to analyze something in a logical fashion and just stay plain as day. [01:55:55.000 --> 01:56:07.000] That makes no sense. That will not work. It can't be true. And as adults, we no longer have that capacity in so many ways. [01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:15.000] We are far too trusting of those that have proven to be completely untrustworthy. How do we account for that? [01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:26.000] How are we going to explain that to our kids when they're working to pay off the debt that we allowed to accrue by letting these people do these things? [01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:35.000] Everybody wants to put it off and make it someone else's responsibility. Well, if you have children or grandchildren, I want you to look them in the eye, [01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:50.000] and I want you to tell them, I am sacrificing your future so I can sit here in my apathy and ignore the problems that I am shifting to your back. [01:56:50.000 --> 01:57:03.000] Do that. See how many of you can do it. Because if when you sit there and do nothing, that is what you're doing. We need to change that. [01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:13.000] I have lots of people coming to the class or calling into the show and telling me how much I motivate them and how much of an effect I'm having. [01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:21.000] Well, folks, that may be true, but we're still few in number compared to the ones that are out there screwing it up. [01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:32.000] We need more. We need to get people listening. We need to get people thinking, and we need to get their brain out of the bedrock in which it's buried. [01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:42.000] Okay? So help me help us all. All right? I know that's a cliché out of Jerry Maguire, but it actually works. [01:57:42.000 --> 01:57:47.000] Help me to help you, because I can't do this alone and neither can you. [01:57:47.000 --> 01:57:58.000] Only by coming to a consensus of ideas and effort and a direction of putting it all forward are we going to fix any of the problems we've got. [01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:13.000] It all starts at home. It all starts with you, and it all starts with loving and caring enough for each other to protect everyone's rights as equally as my own, because that's the only way mine will ever be safe. [01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:28.000] All right, folks. Thank y'all for listening. Thank you for calling. I want y'all to have a great and blessed week. Good night and God bless. [01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:58.000] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:08.000] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:41.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:50.000] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:00.000] Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosradioNetwork.com