[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly [00:06.000 --> 00:08.000] bulletins for the commodities market. [00:08.000 --> 00:21.000] Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [00:21.000 --> 00:28.000] Markets for the 9th of July, 2015 opened up with gold at $1,158.96 an ounce, silver [00:28.000 --> 00:34.000] at $15.39 an ounce, Texas crude at $51.65 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting [00:34.000 --> 00:43.000] in about 271 U.S. currency. [00:43.000 --> 00:48.000] Today in history, Wednesday, July 9, 1980, seven people unfortunately died in a stampede [00:48.000 --> 00:58.000] of a frenzied crowd eager to see Pope John Paul II while he was visiting in Terracina, Brazil. [00:58.000 --> 01:03.000] In recent news, Marine General Joseph Dunford, nominee for the next chairman of the Joint [01:03.000 --> 01:07.000] Chiefs of Staff, rates Russia as the greatest threat to U.S. national security. [01:07.000 --> 01:11.000] My assessment today is that Russia presents the greatest threat to our national security [01:11.000 --> 01:15.000] is what he told the Senate Armed Services Committee at his confirmation hearing this morning. [01:15.000 --> 01:19.000] In line with what current Chairman General Martin Dempsey said in a recently released [01:19.000 --> 01:23.000] report, the National Military Strategy by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he said that Russia [01:23.000 --> 01:28.000] repeatedly demonstrates that it does not respect the sovereignty of its neighbors and it's [01:28.000 --> 01:30.000] willing to use force to achieve its goals. [01:30.000 --> 01:35.000] Of course, Russia has been saying the same exact thing for some years now about NATO [01:35.000 --> 01:44.000] and U.S. militaristic endeavors in the Middle East. [01:44.000 --> 01:48.000] According to the first report, an 87-page document filed this morning in a federal district [01:48.000 --> 01:54.000] court in Manhattan by federal monitor Peter L. Zimroth in charge of overseeing New York [01:54.000 --> 01:58.000] City's police department's stop-and-frisk tactics, which were found to be unconstitutional [01:58.000 --> 02:03.000] in 2013, found that police officers have simply stopped documenting all the encounters that [02:03.000 --> 02:08.000] they have had with citizenry, seriously calling into question the official accounting of a [02:08.000 --> 02:12.000] substantial decline in the unconstitutional stop-and-frisk tactic. [02:12.000 --> 02:17.000] Mr. Zimroth wrote that NYPD has conducted several precinct audits and concluded that [02:17.000 --> 02:20.000] some stops were made but not documented. [02:20.000 --> 02:24.000] More work needs to be done to determine the extent of the problem and to make sure that [02:24.000 --> 02:26.000] there is proper record keeping. [02:26.000 --> 02:32.000] Whether stops have fallen to 46,000 last year from the peak of more than 685,000 in 2011 [02:32.000 --> 02:42.000] because they are simply not being documented is a serious source of concern. [02:42.000 --> 02:47.000] The Long Star Lowdown is looking for sponsors. [02:47.000 --> 02:51.000] If you have a product or service that you would like to advertise here, feel free to [02:51.000 --> 02:55.000] give us a call at 210-863-5617. [02:55.000 --> 03:02.000] This has been your Lowdown for July 9, 2015. [03:26.000 --> 03:30.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:30.000 --> 03:32.000] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:32.000 --> 03:35.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:35.000 --> 03:38.000] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:38.000 --> 03:41.000] When you were eight and you had that trait [03:41.000 --> 03:43.000] You'd go to school and learn the golden rule [03:43.000 --> 03:46.000] So why are you acting like a bloody fool? [03:46.000 --> 03:49.000] If it's sugar, then you must get cool [03:49.000 --> 03:52.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [03:52.000 --> 03:54.000] Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? [03:54.000 --> 03:57.000] Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? [04:24.000 --> 04:26.000] I'm sure I turned them on this time [04:26.000 --> 04:31.000] because somebody forgot once before and I blamed everybody else. [04:31.000 --> 04:33.000] So this time the phone lines are open. [04:33.000 --> 04:36.000] They're on. They'll be open all night. [04:36.000 --> 04:41.000] I called in number 512-646-1984. [04:41.000 --> 04:44.000] If you have a question or a comment, give us a call. [04:44.000 --> 04:49.000] I'm gonna start out talking about rescission. [04:49.000 --> 04:55.000] I just sent a rescission letter the other day to someone [04:55.000 --> 04:59.000] on a property that we're helping a fellow with [04:59.000 --> 05:02.000] and it was interesting studying rescission. [05:02.000 --> 05:06.000] I'm gonna read from a treatment of rescission [05:06.000 --> 05:12.000] but I'll make comments because this is an older document. [05:12.000 --> 05:23.000] It's not up to what's current in law in this Genowski case. [05:23.000 --> 05:27.000] The Genowski case we'll address shortly [05:27.000 --> 05:32.000] but let me start out by talking about what rescission is. [05:32.000 --> 05:35.000] Congress adopted the Truth in Lending Act [05:35.000 --> 05:39.000] in order to assure a meaningful disclosure of credit terms. [05:39.000 --> 05:43.000] Congress adopted the Truth in Lending Act [05:43.000 --> 05:47.000] in order to assure a meaningful disclosure of credit terms [05:47.000 --> 05:50.000] to the consumer obligor. [05:50.000 --> 05:53.000] One method adopted to accomplish this goal [05:53.000 --> 05:58.000] was to give the consumer the right to rescind a credit agreement [05:58.000 --> 06:03.000] if the creditor fails to disclose information required by the Act. [06:03.000 --> 06:10.000] So, rescission was intended as a way to punish the lender [06:10.000 --> 06:13.000] if they did not give full disclosure. [06:13.000 --> 06:16.000] This right applies to those transactions [06:16.000 --> 06:19.000] where a security instrument is created [06:19.000 --> 06:25.000] in the residence of the person to whom the credit is extended. [06:25.000 --> 06:29.000] And this goes to the fact that the Truth in Lending Act [06:29.000 --> 06:33.000] only applies to a consumer [06:33.000 --> 06:39.000] as opposed to a sophisticated lender or investor. [06:39.000 --> 06:45.000] If you purchase something for the purpose of consuming it, [06:45.000 --> 06:52.000] and in this case we're talking about real property, [06:52.000 --> 06:57.000] and you consume the real property by living inside it. [06:57.000 --> 07:03.000] So, if you purchase either a single or up to a four-family home [07:03.000 --> 07:09.000] and you live in the home in one of the units, at least one of the units, [07:09.000 --> 07:15.000] then you are a consumer and Truth in Lending Act applies to you. [07:15.000 --> 07:17.000] The right applies to those transactions [07:17.000 --> 07:19.000] where a security instrument is created [07:19.000 --> 07:23.000] in the residence of the person to whom it is extended. [07:23.000 --> 07:27.000] It's like common law rescission. [07:27.000 --> 07:31.000] The Act provides that the consumer can exercise his right [07:31.000 --> 07:35.000] to rescind the contract without first tendering the consideration [07:35.000 --> 07:37.000] that he has received. [07:37.000 --> 07:39.000] Okay, common law rescission. [07:39.000 --> 07:43.000] If you enter into a contract with someone, [07:43.000 --> 07:48.000] and say you enter into the contract without full disclosure, [07:48.000 --> 07:57.000] if the opposite party had knowledge of some fact [07:57.000 --> 08:01.000] and you did not have equal access to that knowledge, [08:01.000 --> 08:05.000] and the party knew that you did or should reasonably believe [08:05.000 --> 08:10.000] that you would not have equal access to that information, [08:10.000 --> 08:15.000] and if you had that information, [08:15.000 --> 08:22.000] I'm sorry, I'm out of place, and the party failed to reveal that information, [08:22.000 --> 08:26.000] and had you had that information, [08:26.000 --> 08:30.000] you would have made a different decision than you made, [08:30.000 --> 08:34.000] and you made a decision based on the lack of full disclosure [08:34.000 --> 08:37.000] and was harmed thereby. [08:37.000 --> 08:44.000] That may not be exact order of the cause of action for lack of full disclosure, [08:44.000 --> 08:51.000] but in that case, you could say under the common law right to rescind [08:51.000 --> 08:57.000] that I entered into this contract without full disclosure, [08:57.000 --> 09:01.000] without full knowledge of the nature of the contract I entered into. [09:01.000 --> 09:05.000] Therefore, you could rescind the contract, and if you did that, [09:05.000 --> 09:10.000] any benefit you received from the contract, [09:10.000 --> 09:13.000] you would have to return to the other party, [09:13.000 --> 09:16.000] and any benefit the other party received from you, [09:16.000 --> 09:20.000] they would have to return to you, and you both go your separate ways. [09:20.000 --> 09:23.000] That's common law of rescind. [09:23.000 --> 09:27.000] Here, this is a special case rescind. [09:27.000 --> 09:33.000] The Act provides that the consumer can exercise his right to rescind the contract [09:33.000 --> 09:37.000] without first tendering the consideration that he has received. [09:37.000 --> 09:42.000] While this little interpretation of the Act has been applied in one line of cases, [09:42.000 --> 09:46.000] some recent decisions have traditionally modified the Act [09:46.000 --> 09:51.000] to the extent that a court is afforded the discretion to require a consumer [09:51.000 --> 09:57.000] to tender the consideration before rescission of the contract will be effective. [09:57.000 --> 10:06.000] This goes to a difference between the circuits. [10:06.000 --> 10:12.000] The one line of cases where they followed the law precisely was one circuit, [10:12.000 --> 10:22.000] and where they required the person to tender prior to rescission was a different circuit. [10:22.000 --> 10:26.000] So this went to the Supreme Court in the Janowski case, [10:26.000 --> 10:30.000] and the Supreme Court settled this issue, [10:30.000 --> 10:37.000] and they settled this issue by stating that you do not have to go to court, [10:37.000 --> 10:40.000] you do not have to tender. [10:40.000 --> 10:54.000] The Jesenowski case was essentially where the lender claimed that while Jesenowski sued within the three, [10:54.000 --> 11:01.000] I mean, give notice of rescission within the three-year time limit, that if they maintained it, [11:01.000 --> 11:15.000] if the lender did not rescind, then the borrower had three years in which to file suit, [11:15.000 --> 11:25.000] and that was an issue because the statute said they had three years to rescind, not to sue, [11:25.000 --> 11:33.000] and the lender claimed that in order to complete the rescission, they had to sue, [11:33.000 --> 11:36.000] and the Supreme Court said, no, they don't. [11:36.000 --> 11:41.000] They said they don't have three years to sue because they don't have to sue. [11:41.000 --> 11:48.000] They've got three, you've got three years from the origination of the contract [11:48.000 --> 11:55.000] in which to rescind if you have, if the lender has not given full disclosure, [11:55.000 --> 11:59.000] and when you rescind, it's like removal. [11:59.000 --> 12:06.000] Say you're sued in a state court by another party, but that state is not the state you live in. [12:06.000 --> 12:11.000] Then you file a rescission. You don't file a notice of rescission. [12:11.000 --> 12:20.000] You file a rescission. You actually have the power, I'm saying rescission, backup. [12:20.000 --> 12:25.000] You don't file a rescission. You file a removal. [12:25.000 --> 12:32.000] You remove it to the federal court. You have the power to do that as a defendant, [12:32.000 --> 12:36.000] and then the other side can argue for remand. [12:36.000 --> 12:40.000] Rescission is similar in that you actually rescind the note, [12:40.000 --> 12:44.000] and I've got a couple callers, so I won't run too long on this. [12:44.000 --> 12:50.000] When you rescind the note, it is a done deal. [12:50.000 --> 12:53.000] Not even you have the power to unrescind it. [12:53.000 --> 12:56.000] The note, the deed of trust no longer exists. [12:56.000 --> 13:06.000] Now, what does exist is the duty of the parties to make one another whole. [13:06.000 --> 13:10.000] We have a couple callers. I'll take them first. [13:10.000 --> 13:17.000] Once we get that, if we run out of callers, and I'll go back to this, [13:17.000 --> 13:22.000] and we will talk about this thing of making one another whole, [13:22.000 --> 13:26.000] and that goes to the bank giving you back everything that you gave it, [13:26.000 --> 13:33.000] and you tendering what you received from the contract back to the bank, [13:33.000 --> 13:36.000] but we will talk about how to make a claim against the bank [13:36.000 --> 13:41.000] that's in excess of the tender amount so you can claim tender by set off. [13:41.000 --> 13:43.000] Okay, we'll get back to that. [13:43.000 --> 13:48.000] Right now, we're going to go to Jeff in Mississippi, who I was hoping to hear from. [13:48.000 --> 13:51.000] Hello, Mr. Jeff. [13:51.000 --> 13:54.000] Hey, Randy. Thanks for having me on the show. [13:54.000 --> 14:00.000] Glad to have you back. I was looking over your tort letters. [14:00.000 --> 14:03.000] Okay. [14:03.000 --> 14:08.000] Will you talk about your tort letters and what you're doing with it? [14:08.000 --> 14:12.000] Well, I have rewritten them a little bit. [14:12.000 --> 14:19.000] I have sent, I'm sending right now, I'm going to send a series of about 10, [14:19.000 --> 14:25.000] but right now I'm working on three, and I'll just focus on the three just to keep it quicker. [14:25.000 --> 14:30.000] The first two are Forest All Good, the District Attorney, [14:30.000 --> 14:37.000] and then the newspaper when they wrote an article about me possibly being a serial killer or something. [14:37.000 --> 14:39.000] It's a pretty rough article. [14:39.000 --> 14:44.000] So I figured those would be two good torts to start on just because they're simple. [14:44.000 --> 14:51.000] And then the third tort letter is when I have tried to go to the University of Arkansas [14:51.000 --> 14:56.000] and they denied my admission because of the gun charge in prison, [14:56.000 --> 15:02.000] and they did not have transcripts when I tried to appeal. [15:02.000 --> 15:09.000] So that's my third tort letter is to put a tort that you didn't provide me with transcripts. [15:09.000 --> 15:18.000] So back on the first two, I've rewritten them stating that the reporter made allegations claiming facts [15:18.000 --> 15:24.000] that he doesn't have any evidence to, and I'm going to write him a letter asking him to supply the evidence, [15:24.000 --> 15:26.000] and he's got 10 days. [15:26.000 --> 15:32.000] And then the District Attorney, I'm not giving him 10 days because I've already been to court with him, [15:32.000 --> 15:37.000] so I know he doesn't have any facts. [15:37.000 --> 15:39.000] And so I just want to throw that to you. [15:39.000 --> 15:40.000] So wait a minute. [15:40.000 --> 15:48.000] What did you, what did you, you still have to give the District Attorney time to respond. [15:48.000 --> 15:50.000] Okay. [15:50.000 --> 15:53.000] He's going to make up some facts. [15:53.000 --> 15:58.000] So you've got to give him time to make up some horse manure. [15:58.000 --> 16:01.000] Okay. [16:01.000 --> 16:07.000] So you want to, 30 days is a better time, 10 days is kind of short. [16:07.000 --> 16:13.000] They'll whine and complain, but 30 days is kind of a standard response time. [16:13.000 --> 16:14.000] You might consider that. [16:14.000 --> 16:17.000] Did he respond with an excuse? [16:17.000 --> 16:22.000] Well, you don't want them to come back and whine and claim he only gave us 10 days. [16:22.000 --> 16:24.000] That was unfair. [16:24.000 --> 16:34.000] If you give them 30 days, then all through law, anytime, you know, if you get a suit, you got 20 days. [16:34.000 --> 16:39.000] If you file a motion or get a motion filed, you got 30 days. [16:39.000 --> 16:42.000] 30 days is kind of a standard time. [16:42.000 --> 16:43.000] Hang on. [16:43.000 --> 16:44.000] We're about to go to break. [16:44.000 --> 16:48.000] Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Wheel of War Radio. [16:48.000 --> 17:00.000] I call room number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back. [17:00.000 --> 17:06.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [17:06.000 --> 17:09.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. [17:09.000 --> 17:11.000] And it's time we changed all that. [17:11.000 --> 17:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [17:17.000 --> 17:22.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, [17:22.000 --> 17:25.000] young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [17:25.000 --> 17:31.000] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [17:31.000 --> 17:36.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor, [17:36.000 --> 17:40.000] along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [17:40.000 --> 17:47.000] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [17:47.000 --> 17:51.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [17:51.000 --> 17:58.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [17:58.000 --> 18:00.000] Order now. [18:00.000 --> 18:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [18:05.000 --> 18:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [18:09.000 --> 18:15.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two. [18:15.000 --> 18:21.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. [18:21.000 --> 18:25.000] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. [18:25.000 --> 18:27.000] How to answer letters and phone calls. [18:27.000 --> 18:29.000] How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports. [18:29.000 --> 18:34.000] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:34.000 --> 18:39.000] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:39.000 --> 18:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:41.000 --> 18:50.000] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com. [18:50.000 --> 19:01.000] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [19:01.000 --> 19:05.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. [19:05.000 --> 19:32.000] LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:35.000 --> 20:00.000] Okay, we are back. [20:00.000 --> 20:05.000] Randy Kelton, WC with Rule of Law Radio and we are talking to Jeff in Mississippi. [20:05.000 --> 20:13.000] Okay, and so we are going to write the tort letter to the district attorney. [20:13.000 --> 20:18.000] What are you going to claim against the district attorney? [20:18.000 --> 20:33.000] Well, I know this, and that is that in the article he claimed that I was connected with the – he said that I was connected with a homegrown terrorist organization that had committed murders and assaults, [20:33.000 --> 20:40.000] and that I also had 400 bullets in my car and normal people don't have 400 bullets. [20:40.000 --> 20:47.000] So he didn't all out call me a serial killer, but it's pretty close to implication. [20:47.000 --> 20:54.000] That is about the only thing that I can get him on is to claim that he said I was a serial killer. [20:54.000 --> 20:57.000] That was – that's good enough. [20:57.000 --> 21:00.000] Did you have 400 bullets in your car? [21:00.000 --> 21:04.000] Yeah. [21:04.000 --> 21:07.000] Is it unusual to have 400 bullets? [21:07.000 --> 21:25.000] Well, you can buy – if you buy surplus bullets off the Internet or from, you know, from like some kind of Army surplus, they come in a crate of 400 bullets and so you can get them a lot cheaper. [21:25.000 --> 21:27.000] Oh, okay. [21:27.000 --> 21:38.000] And these are old bullets from World War II, so if – let's say you bought an old Mauser and then you found some old German ammunition that was coming out of Romania or something, [21:38.000 --> 21:45.000] they may sell like 400 bullets for $69 and that way you can get a whole bunch for cheap. [21:45.000 --> 21:48.000] The crate was actually still sealed though. [21:48.000 --> 21:52.000] I never opened it. [21:52.000 --> 21:59.000] So the part that you're really getting me on is the membership in a group that had murdered people. [21:59.000 --> 22:04.000] Did he specify what that group was? [22:04.000 --> 22:05.000] Yes. [22:05.000 --> 22:16.000] He – in the article they claimed that I was a member of the Sovereign Citizens, which was connected to murders and deaths is how it is quoted. [22:16.000 --> 22:33.000] They claim or the actual sentence started off with Mr. Hill has some connection with the Sovereign Citizen movement that the FBI has deemed connected with murders and assaults. [22:33.000 --> 22:34.000] Beautiful. [22:34.000 --> 22:35.000] What is that? [22:35.000 --> 22:43.000] So now you want to know specifically what that some connection refers to. [22:43.000 --> 22:44.000] Okay. [22:44.000 --> 22:56.000] And, you know, I've been in this arena for quite a while now and I've been accused of being a member of Sovereign Citizens in court. [22:56.000 --> 23:01.000] But I don't know who they are. [23:01.000 --> 23:05.000] I've never heard of such a group. [23:05.000 --> 23:15.000] Do you know of a group that calls themselves Sovereign Citizens? [23:15.000 --> 23:16.000] Are you asking me? [23:16.000 --> 23:18.000] Yeah. [23:18.000 --> 23:26.000] Oh, well, I looked them up on the Internet and it's Jerry Kane and his son gotten a pretty good shootout with the police. [23:26.000 --> 23:32.000] Yeah, but Jerry Kane didn't – he didn't have a group called Sovereign Citizens. [23:32.000 --> 23:38.000] He called himself a Sovereign Citizen in a republic. [23:38.000 --> 23:43.000] But as far as I know, Jerry Kane didn't have a group. [23:43.000 --> 23:54.000] Well, August, the district attorney actually wrote a response to the Bar Committee, the Bar Association and sent articles of Jerry Kane's shooting claiming that Mr. [23:54.000 --> 23:57.000] Hill is obviously a part of this group. [23:57.000 --> 24:07.000] So he also made that claim to the Bar Association and then it stated in the newspaper that I have some connection. [24:07.000 --> 24:09.000] So he's being kind of vague there. [24:09.000 --> 24:15.000] With the Sovereign Citizens, the FBI says they're connected with murders and assaults. [24:15.000 --> 24:16.000] Okay. [24:16.000 --> 24:24.000] I'm trying to get at he used Sovereign Citizens as a proper noun and not as an adjective. [24:24.000 --> 24:28.000] Yeah, like it's the Boy Scouts of America. [24:28.000 --> 24:29.000] Exactly. [24:29.000 --> 24:37.000] So while I am a – well, actually Sovereign Citizens is kind of a misnomer. [24:37.000 --> 24:39.000] You can't be a Sovereign Citizen. [24:39.000 --> 24:42.000] It's a contradiction of terms. [24:42.000 --> 24:44.000] Either I'm a citizen or I'm a sovereign. [24:44.000 --> 24:47.000] If I'm a sovereign, I'm not a citizen. [24:47.000 --> 25:03.000] But so there is no such thing as a sovereign citizen wherein the term sovereign is an adjective to describe a citizen, a certain type of citizen. [25:03.000 --> 25:10.000] So it can't be used – the phrase can't be used as an adjective, so it must be used as a proper noun. [25:10.000 --> 25:14.000] And we certainly want to find out where that group is. [25:14.000 --> 25:17.000] They have caused us all a lot of problems. [25:17.000 --> 25:18.000] Okay. [25:18.000 --> 25:24.000] But I never heard of them doing anything. [25:24.000 --> 25:27.000] They never got into any shootouts with the police. [25:27.000 --> 25:33.000] I know some people that considered themselves to be sovereign. [25:33.000 --> 25:40.000] They got in shootouts with the police, but I never did find that group. [25:40.000 --> 25:46.000] Okay. That's going to be a great one because he made the clear statement. [25:46.000 --> 25:50.000] Who else are you going to be going after? [25:50.000 --> 25:56.000] Well, the reporter that put that article in the newspaper. [25:56.000 --> 25:58.000] For not checking his sources. [25:58.000 --> 26:08.000] You're going to want to know from the reporter who this Sovereign Citizen group is, where it is, how it's organized, what information he has about this. [26:08.000 --> 26:09.000] Okay. [26:09.000 --> 26:25.000] The Sovereign Citizen group that gave him reason to believe that it actually existed and that you were – what evidence he had that you were a member of. [26:25.000 --> 26:26.000] Okay. [26:26.000 --> 26:47.000] Just the prosecutor making that statement, when the reporter wrote his report, did he say that the prosecuting attorney said or did he make the assertion as a proactive statement? [26:47.000 --> 26:48.000] No. [26:48.000 --> 26:53.000] He claimed that the prosecutor said. [26:53.000 --> 26:59.000] He may be clear, but he does point the finger at the prosecutor. [26:59.000 --> 27:03.000] He'll make a great witness against the prosecutor. [27:03.000 --> 27:04.000] Yeah. [27:04.000 --> 27:18.000] And the prosecutor then turns around and blames the reporter in the bar grievance report, claiming that the reporter is the one that did all the investigation. [27:18.000 --> 27:24.000] Okay, I've got it here. [27:24.000 --> 27:27.000] Got it. [27:27.000 --> 27:30.000] I've got the – [27:30.000 --> 27:32.000] Article? [27:32.000 --> 27:33.000] Yes. [27:33.000 --> 27:34.000] Let me read it. [27:34.000 --> 27:39.000] I want to hear what a scoundrel you are. [27:39.000 --> 27:45.000] Okay, I've got – [27:45.000 --> 27:48.000] Okay, here we go. [27:48.000 --> 27:50.000] Here's talking about my rifle. [27:50.000 --> 27:57.000] It's a Russian model that the – the same that the Soviet military uses, Allgood said. [27:57.000 --> 28:02.000] So this is – Allgood is the district attorney, and this is how it's written. [28:02.000 --> 28:03.000] So it's quoted. [28:03.000 --> 28:10.000] But one of the big eye-openers is that he had 444 rounds of ammunition. [28:10.000 --> 28:14.000] That's far more than the typical hunter would have in his possession. [28:14.000 --> 28:18.000] So he said eye-opener. [28:18.000 --> 28:19.000] Another factor – [28:19.000 --> 28:20.000] Okay, hold on. [28:20.000 --> 28:23.000] Question. [28:23.000 --> 28:30.000] How many rounds would a typical hunter have in his possession? [28:30.000 --> 28:31.000] Well, I don't – [28:31.000 --> 28:40.000] We're not talking about in your pockets or in your car, but how many would a typical hunter own? [28:40.000 --> 28:45.000] I would say easily 500 rounds. [28:45.000 --> 28:47.000] That's a great question. [28:47.000 --> 28:48.000] Most people would buy in bulk. [28:48.000 --> 28:56.000] You know, if you buy 22 bullets, you buy a brick of 1,000, you know, just to keep you from having to buy so many or go back to the store. [28:56.000 --> 29:10.000] Why don't you go to a gun store and ask them how many they typically sell to their avid hunters? [29:10.000 --> 29:21.000] Not your once a year or twice a year, but people who are really hunters, how many bullets will they normally own? [29:21.000 --> 29:30.000] And now we want to know how the prosecutor made the determination that this was more than a typical hunter would hold. [29:30.000 --> 29:31.000] Uh-huh. [29:31.000 --> 29:32.000] Put on. [29:32.000 --> 29:36.000] I'm being an attorney here. [29:36.000 --> 29:44.000] Trying to tear apart the statements that are based in fact and statements that are conclusions. [29:44.000 --> 29:45.000] Hang on. [29:45.000 --> 29:48.000] This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Woodrow R. Radio. [29:48.000 --> 29:52.000] I called in number 512-646-1984. [29:52.000 --> 30:03.000] We'll be right back. [30:03.000 --> 30:05.000] Could you get hooked on your tanning salon? [30:05.000 --> 30:07.000] A new study suggests so. [30:07.000 --> 30:11.000] In fact, researchers say tanning may be as addictive as drugs. [30:11.000 --> 30:15.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll have the not-so-sunny details in a moment. [30:15.000 --> 30:17.000] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.000 --> 30:21.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:21.000 --> 30:26.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:26.000 --> 30:27.000] So protect your rights. [30:27.000 --> 30:31.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:31.000 --> 30:33.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.000 --> 30:41.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:41.000 --> 30:45.000] Start over with StartPage. [30:45.000 --> 30:50.000] Despite the risk of skin cancer, a million Americans use tanning salons every day. [30:50.000 --> 30:55.000] They say they're after that cool bronze look, but could their motivation be more than skin deep? [30:55.000 --> 31:04.000] A new study in Texas finds the real appeal may not be golden skin, but rather ultraviolet radiation, which scientists say may be as addictive as drugs. [31:04.000 --> 31:10.000] When habitual tanners receive the UV light from a tanning session, the addiction areas of their brains light up. [31:10.000 --> 31:16.000] But when those UV rays are secretly filtered out, they experience cravings and withdrawal symptoms. [31:16.000 --> 31:20.000] Maybe tanning booths are the opium dens of the 21st century. [31:20.000 --> 31:41.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:50.000 --> 32:02.000] The body, the nutrients it needs. Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at SQSA.org. [32:02.000 --> 32:05.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [32:05.000 --> 32:13.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:13.000 --> 32:19.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:19.000 --> 32:25.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:25.000 --> 32:35.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:35.000 --> 32:40.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:40.000 --> 32:47.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, [32:47.000 --> 32:50.000] hundreds of research documents and other useful resource materials. [32:50.000 --> 32:54.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:54.000 --> 33:02.000] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:02.000 --> 33:13.000] Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:13.000 --> 33:19.000] Yes, Mr. Office, I've been taking you right ahead. [33:19.000 --> 33:23.000] Won't you follow the law of the land? [33:23.000 --> 33:26.000] I don't understand. [33:26.000 --> 33:29.000] You'd rather stick to pick up the service. [33:29.000 --> 33:31.000] Not be Arabians. [33:31.000 --> 33:34.000] Not this way! [33:34.000 --> 33:40.000] When you're gonna stop abuse, you know how it works. [33:40.000 --> 33:45.000] When you're gonna stop abuse, you know how it works. [33:45.000 --> 33:51.000] When you're gonna stop abuse, you know how it works. [33:51.000 --> 33:56.000] When you're gonna stop abuse, you know how it works. [33:56.000 --> 34:02.000] Please, Mr. Michael and each officer, come to abuse the power. [34:02.000 --> 34:05.000] Send a request to the leader. [34:05.000 --> 34:10.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, ruleoflawradio. [34:10.000 --> 34:13.000] And we're talking to Jeff in Mississippi. [34:13.000 --> 34:21.000] On the break, Jeff said you had called and had a very good point. [34:21.000 --> 34:28.000] Gun shops. Jeff, do you reload your own cartridges? [34:28.000 --> 34:32.000] What? No, I do not reload cartridges. [34:32.000 --> 34:35.000] You're thinking about it, aren't you? [34:35.000 --> 34:38.000] What's that, reloading cartridges? [34:38.000 --> 34:42.000] He said check gun shops that have ranges. [34:42.000 --> 34:43.000] Oh, ranges? [34:43.000 --> 34:45.000] And reloading equipment. [34:45.000 --> 34:50.000] Ranges and reloading equipment because those guys have lots of cartridges. [34:50.000 --> 34:51.000] Yeah. [34:51.000 --> 34:58.000] So we're looking for this notion of 400 cartridges being a lot. [34:58.000 --> 35:04.000] The prosecutor made that as a proactive statement of fact. [35:04.000 --> 35:05.000] Yes. [35:05.000 --> 35:09.000] Now you want to prove it up. [35:09.000 --> 35:11.000] Got it. [35:11.000 --> 35:15.000] Okay, go on with your article. [35:15.000 --> 35:18.000] Okay, total change of pace now. [35:18.000 --> 35:20.000] So here we go, here's the change. [35:20.000 --> 35:28.000] Another factor Allgood said was some connection between Hill and the Sovereign Citizen Movement, [35:28.000 --> 35:34.000] and that's all capitalized, which the Federal Bureau of Investigation identifies as an [35:34.000 --> 35:42.000] anti-government extremist group linked to murders and assaults among other crimes. [35:42.000 --> 35:47.000] Allgood said Hill denied being associated with the group. [35:47.000 --> 35:50.000] It was up to the jury as to whether they believed him or not. [35:50.000 --> 35:55.000] Allgood said, I think this jury saw things a little differently than the first. [35:55.000 --> 35:59.000] The bottom line is that we don't live in a vacuum, he added. [35:59.000 --> 36:05.000] The events of our recent history shows that his situation was one that we had to be concerned about. [36:05.000 --> 36:14.000] This was not just a turkey hunter with a shotgun in his trunk. [36:14.000 --> 36:16.000] What do you think about that? [36:16.000 --> 36:22.000] I think that, is this an article that came out after you were convicted? [36:22.000 --> 36:25.000] Yes, it came out after I was already in jail. [36:25.000 --> 36:32.000] It appeared in the local newspaper. [36:32.000 --> 36:42.000] Okay, that part, the Sovereign Citizens Group, he implied that there was some evidence [36:42.000 --> 36:46.000] before the jury that you were in the Sovereign Citizens Group. [36:46.000 --> 36:48.000] Was there? [36:48.000 --> 36:50.000] No, absolutely not. [36:50.000 --> 36:52.000] I've never been a member of those guys. [36:52.000 --> 36:53.000] No, no. [36:53.000 --> 37:02.000] Was there anything brought into the court concerning your membership in a Sovereign Citizens Group? [37:02.000 --> 37:06.000] Oh, yes, and I made total fools out of them. [37:06.000 --> 37:13.000] The campus security guard got up and claimed to be an expert on anti-terrorist groups, [37:13.000 --> 37:17.000] and he claimed that he had done research on Wikipedia. [37:17.000 --> 37:23.000] So me being my own attorney, I said, okay, what evidence do we have that I'm a member of this group? [37:23.000 --> 37:25.000] Oh, well, we don't have any. [37:25.000 --> 37:28.000] Well, then how are you up here testifying? [37:28.000 --> 37:32.000] Well, because I've studied it on the Internet. [37:32.000 --> 37:38.000] Then he went on to say, but we did find a map in Mr. Hill's room [37:38.000 --> 37:44.000] that had cities of the United States with lines drawn to them. [37:44.000 --> 37:50.000] Well, that was my national geography class where I was doing a typography map, [37:50.000 --> 37:56.000] and he got up and he did not say that I was going to go to cities and start shooting people, [37:56.000 --> 38:00.000] but he made it sound like that I had kill zones listed out. [38:00.000 --> 38:09.000] And, of course, I objected and said that that was part of my geography report, and that was that. [38:09.000 --> 38:11.000] So, okay. [38:11.000 --> 38:21.000] So, essentially, at any end, no matter what you did, they intended to prosecute you anyway. [38:21.000 --> 38:34.000] So, but the end of that assertion that they believed it, they may not get a shot at him on that one. [38:34.000 --> 38:42.000] Since they convicted you, his implication was warranted. [38:42.000 --> 38:44.000] Really? [38:44.000 --> 38:56.000] Even though it was untrue, or it was conjecture on his part, but he presented that as conjecture. [38:56.000 --> 38:57.000] Okay. [38:57.000 --> 39:03.000] He did say that you denied membership in it, and that jury didn't believe that you denied. [39:03.000 --> 39:06.000] I don't think you'll have a shot at him on that one. [39:06.000 --> 39:07.000] Okay. [39:07.000 --> 39:10.000] I'd like to get a shot at him just for the fun of it. [39:10.000 --> 39:17.000] The whole thing is that the campus was never on, the apartments were never on campus property to begin with. [39:17.000 --> 39:26.000] So, can I go back and get in for that? [39:26.000 --> 39:33.000] That's the thing that you haven't got positively adjudicated. [39:33.000 --> 39:37.000] There isn't a ruling that says that you weren't on campus. [39:37.000 --> 39:48.000] And until you can get this bogus conviction overturned, they can rely on the conviction. [39:48.000 --> 39:50.000] Does that make sense? [39:50.000 --> 39:53.000] Yeah. [39:53.000 --> 39:56.000] So, you may not get him there. [39:56.000 --> 39:57.000] Okay. [39:57.000 --> 40:11.000] Now, the thing I would really like you to look at is him prosecuting you on the false indictment. [40:11.000 --> 40:13.000] Sure. [40:13.000 --> 40:14.000] That he knew. [40:14.000 --> 40:19.000] He knew what the law was, and he pursued you anyway. [40:19.000 --> 40:22.000] That should at least get him malpracticed. [40:22.000 --> 40:31.000] And right now, with all of the pressure on these guys, you might actually get some traction. [40:31.000 --> 40:37.000] Because it appears as though there's a good chance there was never an indictment. [40:37.000 --> 40:38.000] Yes. [40:38.000 --> 40:45.000] You might try to get the original indictment, and you have the name of the foreman? [40:45.000 --> 40:46.000] Yes, I do. [40:46.000 --> 40:52.000] And I've already brought charges against her with the very same DA that I went to court with, [40:52.000 --> 40:59.000] and the district attorney has not responded back with me. [40:59.000 --> 41:06.000] So, I need to look at Mississippi law. [41:06.000 --> 41:15.000] In Texas, the prosecutor would have a specific duty to file your complaint with the grand jury. [41:15.000 --> 41:17.000] Well, actually not a grand jury. [41:17.000 --> 41:23.000] He would have a requirement to present your complaint to some magistrate, [41:23.000 --> 41:28.000] and the magistrate would have a requirement to hold an examining trial. [41:28.000 --> 41:33.000] And then after the examining trial, seal all documents in an envelope, [41:33.000 --> 41:37.000] cause his name to be written across the seal of the envelope, [41:37.000 --> 41:39.000] and forward it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. [41:39.000 --> 41:43.000] And the clerk of the court was required to keep all those documents safe [41:43.000 --> 41:46.000] and deliver them up to the next grand jury. [41:46.000 --> 41:48.000] Well, that's what it says in Texas. [41:48.000 --> 41:55.000] I don't know what it says in Mississippi, so I wouldn't know how to get a shot at him, [41:55.000 --> 42:03.000] but that's pretty close to how jurisprudence is supposed to work. [42:03.000 --> 42:09.000] Prosecutors are just hired mouthpieces for the state. [42:09.000 --> 42:15.000] In the overall scheme of things, they're not intended to have any real power. [42:15.000 --> 42:20.000] The courts have given them a discretion that's strictly court-created, [42:20.000 --> 42:22.000] where it was originally court-created, [42:22.000 --> 42:27.000] and in Texas we finally got some legislation to that effect. [42:27.000 --> 42:29.000] But for the most part, they're just attorneys. [42:29.000 --> 42:37.000] So, when you read the code, the attorney's just kind of tangential. [42:37.000 --> 42:42.000] There is a process for handling a criminal complaint [42:42.000 --> 42:46.000] that doesn't really include the attorney. [42:46.000 --> 42:49.000] Complaint is to be given to a magistrate. [42:49.000 --> 42:55.000] If a complaint is given to a prosecutor, then he's to give it to a magistrate. [42:55.000 --> 42:57.000] So the magistrate's where it starts. [42:57.000 --> 43:00.000] And then the magistrate sends it to the clerk of the court, [43:00.000 --> 43:03.000] and the clerk of the court sends it to the grand jury. [43:03.000 --> 43:07.000] That's how the law says it's supposed to move through the system. [43:07.000 --> 43:11.000] You might look at the Mississippi transportation, [43:11.000 --> 43:16.000] the Mississippi Code of Criminal Procedure, or Criminal Procedure Code, [43:16.000 --> 43:23.000] however they call it there, and see what it says concerning complaints. [43:23.000 --> 43:29.000] And it'll probably be right in the front or in the section on duties of officers. [43:29.000 --> 43:32.000] And track down how that's supposed to work. [43:32.000 --> 43:33.000] Got it. [43:33.000 --> 43:37.000] So you see, once you've got all these pieces put together, [43:37.000 --> 43:44.000] then we can see where the prosecutor or where justice should have intervened [43:44.000 --> 43:49.000] on this indictment where there was no transcript. [43:49.000 --> 43:51.000] All right. [43:51.000 --> 43:52.000] Okay, hang on. [43:52.000 --> 43:54.000] Randy Kelton, Wheeler Well Radio. [43:54.000 --> 43:57.000] I'll call it number 512-646-1984. [43:57.000 --> 44:00.000] We'll be right back. [44:00.000 --> 44:03.000] Hello. [44:03.000 --> 44:06.000] My name is Stuart Smith from NaturesPureOrganics.com, [44:06.000 --> 44:10.000] and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, [44:10.000 --> 44:14.000] Sweet D., here in Austin, Texas, buying Brave New Books and Chase Bank [44:14.000 --> 44:18.000] to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [44:18.000 --> 44:22.000] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [44:22.000 --> 44:26.000] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil, [44:26.000 --> 44:30.000] lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [44:30.000 --> 44:37.000] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at NaturesPureOrganics.com. [44:37.000 --> 44:43.000] That's 512-264-4043, NaturesPureOrganics.com. [44:43.000 --> 44:47.000] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products. [44:47.000 --> 44:49.000] NaturesPureOrganics.com. [44:49.000 --> 45:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:04.000 --> 45:07.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, [45:07.000 --> 45:15.000] the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:15.000 --> 45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:23.000 --> 45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:28.000 --> 45:34.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:34.000 --> 45:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:39.000 --> 45:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.000 --> 45:49.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.000 --> 45:52.000] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.000 --> 46:14.000] Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [46:14.000 --> 46:23.000] If you did not have any problems, where do you want to go for one? If you could not reach any bouts of love, [46:23.000 --> 46:32.000] would your purpose have to be done? Such a sentiment, a soldier, a warrior, a club, scouple, and they keep the peace. [46:32.000 --> 46:48.000] All is taken in the misunderstanding if somebody calls the police. [46:48.000 --> 47:02.000] Why do the sparks fly? Why do the sparks fly? [47:02.000 --> 47:07.000] The friction isn't the fiction, the hard work can lead you to hopelessness. [47:07.000 --> 47:13.000] There's impossibility, choice, tranquility, a heavy load that can't be unscathed. [47:13.000 --> 47:19.000] The time is colliding with the constant, it's run down after a while. [47:19.000 --> 47:24.000] It's not your moral standard, it's your patience that's on trial. [47:24.000 --> 47:47.000] Why do the sparks fly? [47:54.000 --> 48:11.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Jeff in Mississippi. [48:11.000 --> 48:19.000] Jeff, get those things worked up, work up as good as you can, and then send them to me. We'll talk about them next week. [48:19.000 --> 48:27.000] Okay. I've got one quick question. That is the administrative hearing that I had at the University of Arkansas [48:27.000 --> 48:36.000] where they denied me entrance and basically accused me of possibly wanting to kill people on this campus in Arkansas. [48:36.000 --> 48:43.000] When I tried to appeal, I did an open records request and they did not have transcripts from that hearing. [48:43.000 --> 48:46.000] So can I send these people a tort letter and sue them? [48:46.000 --> 48:50.000] Are they required to have transcripts? [48:50.000 --> 48:55.000] Well, I don't know. I mean, it was the University of Arkansas. [48:55.000 --> 48:57.000] Then if this was a... [48:57.000 --> 48:59.000] It was a... [48:59.000 --> 49:03.000] They may not be required to have transcripts. [49:03.000 --> 49:07.000] How would I find out? [49:07.000 --> 49:17.000] That's a good question. The University of Arkansas, it's a university, so they would fall under open records [49:17.000 --> 49:24.000] to see if administrative hearings are required to be recorded. [49:24.000 --> 49:32.000] Yeah, and it was a big hearing. It was me and about six or seven other high officials like the director of security, [49:32.000 --> 49:39.000] the dean of the college, the provost, the director of student conducts. It wasn't just me and a biology teacher. [49:39.000 --> 49:41.000] This was heavy stuff. [49:41.000 --> 49:51.000] Then most likely it should have been recorded, but that would be almost certainly open records, the Arkansas Records Act. [49:51.000 --> 49:57.000] They have failed to send me those open records and I would love to send them a tort letter. [49:57.000 --> 50:07.000] Yeah. Well, as I read the codes, if Arkansas is similar to Texas and other states I've looked at, [50:07.000 --> 50:16.000] California, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, the Open Records Act is a criminal statute. It's not a civil statute. [50:16.000 --> 50:21.000] Why? It does cause a civil tort. It's criminal. [50:21.000 --> 50:27.000] Well, I've already filed charges with the district attorney and he's refused to bring any charges. [50:27.000 --> 50:36.000] Okay. We need to back up to the procedure. Let's just run the routine on them. [50:36.000 --> 50:47.000] Don't file it with the prosecutor. Ignore him. File it with the magistrate. Just walk up the routine on them. [50:47.000 --> 50:48.000] Okay. [50:48.000 --> 50:59.000] They want to accuse you of stacking charges, but if you walk the routine on them, you walk right down their code. [50:59.000 --> 51:07.000] Their code tells a magistrate what a magistrate is to do when he's given notice that a crime has been committed. [51:07.000 --> 51:14.000] And you accuse the magistrate of not performing that duty and in the process deny you the equal protection of the laws. [51:14.000 --> 51:20.000] The police are going to tell you, I have no duty to protect you. That's true. You don't. [51:20.000 --> 51:33.000] And I tell them, I don't need you to protect me. I have the law for that. I need you to enforce the law and the law will protect me. [51:33.000 --> 51:40.000] And I am not interested in your opinion as to whether or not you want to enforce the law. [51:40.000 --> 51:55.000] You enforce it. You don't like it. If you don't trust it to achieve justice and think you have to interpose your own personal biases and prejudices on the law, [51:55.000 --> 52:04.000] then you need to get that pistol off your hip. Go out and pick up dead cats and scumps off the highway or you won't be disrupting our jurisprudence. [52:04.000 --> 52:11.000] I told that to chief of police in Bridgeport, Texas, and he did not take that well. [52:11.000 --> 52:21.000] But that is my position. You are the servant. I am the master, along with all my other masters. [52:21.000 --> 52:38.000] And we have engaged you to perform a duty. That duty does not include discretion as to what you want to do and what you don't want to do. [52:38.000 --> 52:50.000] When I invoke the duty of a magistrate, I am not particularly interested in what his opinion is about whether or not he should do this job. [52:50.000 --> 52:57.000] Code says he is supposed to do it. If he fails to do it, he denies me in the equal protection of the laws. [52:57.000 --> 53:10.000] And every state that I have looked at has a statute that reflects the Ku Klux Klan Act. Absolutely, Arkansas is going to have one. [53:10.000 --> 53:20.000] Public official acting on the code of his authority fails to perform a duty he is required to perform and in the process denies me the full and free access to or enjoyment of right. [53:20.000 --> 53:26.000] That's a class A misdemeanor in every state I've looked at or something similar, depending on what they call it. [53:26.000 --> 53:31.000] Always it's the next thing to a felony. That's a big deal. [53:31.000 --> 53:38.000] So you go to the magistrate, give him the complaint. He refuses to act on it. [53:38.000 --> 53:45.000] Wonderful. That works. Then you go to a higher level magistrate. [53:45.000 --> 53:51.000] I like to start with a JP because they're always going to ask you, did you do this? Did you do that? Did you do this? [53:51.000 --> 53:57.000] And every time they ask me, yeah, I did that. Yeah, I did that. Yeah, I did that. [53:57.000 --> 54:01.000] And we stack up a lot of charges. [54:01.000 --> 54:10.000] But when they start walking down the charges, they're not really multiple charges. They're progressive charges. [54:10.000 --> 54:14.000] You don't have a whole stack against one person. [54:14.000 --> 54:20.000] You see, I went to this guy and evoked his duty under this statute and he failed to perform his duty. [54:20.000 --> 54:31.000] So my remedy was to go to this guy over here and ask him to exert the remedy against that guy. And he refused to do it. [54:31.000 --> 54:35.000] And so I went to this one and he refused to do it. [54:35.000 --> 54:42.000] When I got in front of the head criminal district judge in Travis County, [54:42.000 --> 55:00.000] I bushwhacked him with a set of criminal complaints against the court of criminal appeals or against the district attorney for not presenting my complaints against the judges of the court of criminal appeals on magistrate and the grand jury. [55:00.000 --> 55:12.000] He said, well, Mr. Kelton, you really need to take these to a, well, first, he said, well, I'm a district judge and district judges in Travis County don't take criminal complaints. [55:12.000 --> 55:16.000] I said, that's all right. I'm not here to invoke your duty as a district judge. [55:16.000 --> 55:19.000] I'm here to invoke your duty as a magistrate. [55:19.000 --> 55:22.000] And that's a duty from which you may not shield yourself. [55:22.000 --> 55:29.000] And he sat back for a minute and then he leaned forward and he said, well, Mr. Kelton, you really should take these to a justice of the peace. [55:29.000 --> 55:32.000] When I was in justice of the peace, I took criminal complaints. [55:32.000 --> 55:34.000] I said, well, I tried that judge. [55:34.000 --> 55:38.000] Took them to an old herb over here across the street. [55:38.000 --> 55:42.000] He wouldn't take them because there were complaints against you in there. [55:42.000 --> 55:45.000] And he sat back and then he realized who it was. [55:45.000 --> 55:50.000] Well, Mr. Kelton, you should file these to the sheriff's department, did that judge. [55:50.000 --> 55:53.000] And he threw them in the trash. [55:53.000 --> 55:59.000] Well, Mr. Kelton, you should petition for a writ of mandamus. [55:59.000 --> 56:05.000] You should appeal to the district court for a writ of mandamus. [56:05.000 --> 56:09.000] Judge, don't ask me to appeal. [56:09.000 --> 56:17.000] You come into these courts and go before a corrupt judge and they render a bogus decision and everybody says, oh, that's okay. [56:17.000 --> 56:22.000] You can appeal to whole panel of corrupt judges and they'll really screw you oil. [56:22.000 --> 56:28.000] And the judge kind of chuckled and sat back and he said, well, Mr. Kelton, I don't think it's quite that bad. [56:28.000 --> 56:30.000] That's because you're not pro se. [56:30.000 --> 56:32.000] I got a better idea. [56:32.000 --> 56:35.000] I'll appeal to the grand jury. [56:35.000 --> 56:37.000] Well, Mr. Kelton, you can't appeal to the grand jury. [56:37.000 --> 56:39.000] I said, sure I can. [56:39.000 --> 56:48.000] I can appeal to the grand jury, to the west of the sheriff for shielding from prosecution, criminal violation 3805 penal code. [56:48.000 --> 56:57.000] And the judge sat back in his seat and looked at me like, I wonder if I could get away with having my bailiff shoot this guy. [56:57.000 --> 57:05.000] But he wound up getting my complaints to the district clerk, which eventually got him to the grand jury. [57:05.000 --> 57:06.000] Okay. [57:06.000 --> 57:10.000] Point was, everything he said, did you do this? [57:10.000 --> 57:12.000] I did that. [57:12.000 --> 57:17.000] And I had more stuff that I had done that he didn't think to ask me about. [57:17.000 --> 57:23.000] When you start walking the routine on them, that's when you really start getting their attention. [57:23.000 --> 57:33.000] When they realize you're setting them up, you go in and ask them to do something and they don't do it. [57:33.000 --> 57:41.000] And they think they have thwarted you and they find out they've done exactly what you wanted them to. [57:41.000 --> 57:47.000] If we're going to get this system fixed, this is one of the ways we're going to get it done. [57:47.000 --> 57:50.000] But I really need to move along. [57:50.000 --> 57:54.000] Jeff, this has been way too much fun. [57:54.000 --> 57:56.000] Call back next week. [57:56.000 --> 57:58.000] Let us know how this goes. [57:58.000 --> 57:59.000] Okay. [57:59.000 --> 58:00.000] Thank you. [58:00.000 --> 58:02.000] And thank you for calling in, Jeff. [58:02.000 --> 58:06.000] This is Randy Kelkin, Deborah Stevens, Wheel of War Radio. [58:06.000 --> 58:14.000] On this Friday, the ninth day of July already, 2015. [58:14.000 --> 58:19.000] And you all want to make sure you listen to Mara and I because we're going to have a very special guest on. [58:19.000 --> 58:26.000] We're going to have a genuine, dyed-in-the-wool lawyer. [58:26.000 --> 58:32.000] And I really want to have this lawyer on because she is the real deal. [58:32.000 --> 58:36.000] And there are some real lawyers out there. [58:36.000 --> 58:39.000] I'm really looking forward to having her out there. [58:39.000 --> 58:40.000] So hang on. [58:40.000 --> 58:41.000] We'll be back on the other side. [58:41.000 --> 58:43.000] Philip, Ralph, I see you there. [58:43.000 --> 58:45.000] We'll pick you up on the other side. [58:45.000 --> 58:50.000] We'll be right back. [58:50.000 --> 58:58.000] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.000 --> 59:06.000] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. [59:06.000 --> 59:09.000] Enter the recovery version. [59:09.000 --> 59:18.000] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.000 --> 59:27.000] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:27.000 --> 59:33.000] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.000 --> 59:47.000] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:47.000 --> 59:50.000] That's freestudybible.com. [59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:08.000] The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily bulletins for the commodity market. [01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:21.000] Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative. [01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:43.000] Markets for the 9th of July, 2015, opened up with gold at $1,158.96 an ounce, silver, $15.39 an ounce, Texas crude, $51.65 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 271 U.S. currency. [01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:46.000] Today in history, Wednesday, July 9, 1980. [01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:58.000] Seven people unfortunately died in a stampede of a frenzied crowd eager to see Pope John Paul II while he was visiting in Terracina, Brazil. [01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:07.000] In recent news, Marine General Joseph Dunford, nominee for the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, rates Russia as the greatest threat to U.S. national security. [01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:16.000] My assessment today is that Russia presents the greatest threat to our national security, is what he told the Senate Armed Services Committee at his confirmation hearing this morning. [01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:30.000] In line with what current Chairman General Martin Dempsey said in a recently released report, The National Military Strategy by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he said that Russia repeatedly demonstrates that it does not respect the sovereignty of its neighbors and it's willing to use force to achieve its goals. [01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:44.000] Of course, Russia has been saying the same exact thing for some years now about NATO and U.S. militaristic endeavors in the Middle East. [01:01:44.000 --> 01:02:13.000] According to the first report, an 87-page document filed this morning in a federal district court in Manhattan by federal monitor Peter L. Zimroth, in charge of overseeing New York City's police department stop and frisk tactics, which were found to be unconstitutional in 2013, found that police officers have simply stopped documenting all the encounters that they have had with citizenry, seriously calling into question the official accounting of a substantial decline in the unconstitutional stop and frisk tactic. [01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:26.000] Mr. Zimroth wrote that NYPD has conducted several precinct audits and concluded that some stops were made but not documented. More work needs to be done to determine the extent of the problem and to make sure that there is proper record keeping. [01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:45.000] Whether stops have fallen to 46,000 last year from the peak of more than 685,000 in 2011 because they were simply not being documented is a serious source of concern. [01:02:45.000 --> 01:03:00.000] The Long Star Lowdown is looking for sponsors. If you have a product or a service you'd like to advertise here, feel free to give us a call at 210-863-5617. This has been your Lowdown for July 9, 2015. [01:03:15.000 --> 01:03:37.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, David Stevens, you have our radio and we're going to Mr. Philip in Texas. Hello, Mr. Philip. [01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:39.000] Hey, Randy, how's it going? [01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:50.000] It's going good. I made another year. [01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:52.000] Okay, what do you have for us today? [01:03:52.000 --> 01:04:09.000] So what I was calling about was a lawsuit case I've been calling in about the last couple of months off and on and just received in the mail a letter. [01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:15.000] Wait, hold on. Give us a brief synopsis so everybody's up to speed. [01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:25.000] Hold on. That's not because I forgot. Don't construe that from it. Okay, I forgot. [01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:47.000] So what it was is a credit card debt. A law firm was suing us. And what they did was they went and posted a lawsuit on our door instead of actually serving us with that. [01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:57.000] They actually was the unsigned order of alternate service or substitute service. [01:04:57.000 --> 01:05:06.000] Okay, hold on. This is one where didn't they ask for alternative service and the judge didn't grant it? [01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:23.000] Yes, not only did the judge not grant it, he denied it. Nice big denied stamp all over it. And well, the one they posted on my door, of course, didn't have the judge's signature nor the fact that it was denied. [01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:33.000] So, you know, I found that only whenever I got the official one from the court record. [01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:48.000] I did still respond to the suit, but then also put in filed some, what was the word for it? [01:05:48.000 --> 01:05:51.000] Did you object to improper service? [01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:57.000] I did not. Personally, I didn't have a problem with the service. [01:05:57.000 --> 01:05:59.000] Okay, wait, that's not it. [01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:03.000] I didn't have a problem with the service, but yeah. [01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:15.000] If the judge denied them alternative service and they used alternative service anyway, that would give you an opportunity to ask for sanctions. [01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:22.000] And I still do plan on doing that. [01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:31.000] The first thing I did was just put in a bar grievance to both of the lawyers involved. [01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:55.000] And so I did that and I responded to the suit and about a month later received a letter in the mail saying that, of course, the bar found that there was. [01:06:55.000 --> 01:07:02.000] Let me guess, we examined into your accusation and find it does not rise to the level of misconduct. [01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:04.000] Absolutely, absolutely. [01:07:04.000 --> 01:07:13.000] And but lo and behold, about a week later, we received a letter from the law firm directly. [01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:16.000] And let me just read it, it's very short. [01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:24.000] It says, please find and close the plaintiff's notice of non-suit and order granting non-suit for filing in the above reference lawsuit. [01:07:24.000 --> 01:07:29.000] Once you have completed the filing, please forward it to the court for approval. [01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:37.000] After review and approval of the same, please return a confirmed copy of the signed order of non-suit to our offices. [01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:38.000] Wow. [01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:45.000] So, thanks a lot. [01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:49.000] So you think that grievance got their attention? [01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:51.000] I think you did. [01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:53.000] That is good news. [01:07:53.000 --> 01:08:00.000] The fact that I was accusing them of, not formally, but just in the bar brief, [01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:12.000] it's accusing them of fraud, conspiracy, and falsifying a criminal document. [01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:16.000] I mean, falsifying a court document. [01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:20.000] So I think all those might have got their attention. [01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:24.000] That is good news. [01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:29.000] Tomorrow night, we're going to have a lawyer on. [01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:33.000] I would like her to, why don't you call in tomorrow night? [01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:41.000] I'd like to talk about this on their debt collectors. [01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:43.000] They do everything wrong. [01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:44.000] Of course. [01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:50.000] And they know, but they make more money doing it wrong. [01:08:50.000 --> 01:08:52.000] It's all about the money. [01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:57.000] And every once in a while, somebody comes along and stings them good. [01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:01.000] Well, the cost of doing business. [01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:09.000] So the idea of bar greeting these guys this way, this goes to more than the cost of doing business. [01:09:09.000 --> 01:09:14.000] This stings them in their profession. [01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:25.000] The thing I want to ask the lawyer tomorrow night is since they've sued and non-sued it, [01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:35.000] I'm not really up to speed on what the effect of a non-sued is. [01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:41.000] If somebody sues me and I respond to the suit and then they non-sue, [01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:46.000] can they come back and file the same suit again? [01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:57.000] Or do they have to have some new information or some other reason to be able to file again and force me [01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:04.000] to have to come back to the court and go through the time and inconvenience to answer them again? [01:10:04.000 --> 01:10:11.000] In this exact suit, it would be a good answer to no. [01:10:11.000 --> 01:10:16.000] In this exact suit, though, they barely got the lawsuit in before the statute of limitations expired. [01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:23.000] So the fact that they're now non-suting it means that to refile would be after the statute of limitations. [01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:26.000] So that was kind of a done deal. [01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:27.000] No matter what. [01:10:27.000 --> 01:10:28.000] Yeah, exactly. [01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:36.000] They are requesting in the actual notice of non-suit that it be non-suit of all claims against defendant [01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:39.000] in the bust out lawsuit without prejudice. [01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:46.000] So from what I understand from a dismissal, without prejudice, that means they can bring it again. [01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:50.000] I think they're asking for the same sort of privilege. [01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:52.000] I don't know if that is. [01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:55.000] That's kind of standard when you non-suit. [01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:06.000] I would think that if a court hasn't ordered you to non-suit, then you always have the right to come to resue. [01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:13.000] But I'm sure there's case law that says you can't just sue a non-suit and then sue again. [01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:17.000] You have to have some reason to be able to come back to the court [01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:23.000] and force the defendant to respond to your pleading a second time. [01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:25.000] And that's what we'll ask the lawyer tomorrow night. [01:11:25.000 --> 01:11:30.000] That's a little fine issue that I haven't looked at yet. [01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:35.000] Because almost always when you're non-suit, it's without prejudice. [01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:36.000] Right. [01:11:36.000 --> 01:11:38.000] In your case, it's not a concern. [01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:42.000] No, it's not in my case. [01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:46.000] How long did this take? [01:11:46.000 --> 01:11:51.000] Oh, beginning to end, I think it was... [01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:54.000] Oh, here's the original date. [01:11:54.000 --> 01:12:02.000] It was in March. [01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:05.000] That's not bad at all. [01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:07.000] No, yeah. [01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:12.000] Did you send these guys a dispute letter? [01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:14.000] I did. [01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:20.000] Did they give you a responsive answer to the dispute letter? [01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:26.000] No, they gave me a non-responsive answer. [01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:28.000] So did they continue... [01:12:28.000 --> 01:12:36.000] Okay, since they continued to try to collect the debt, technically you got a shot at them. [01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:37.000] Yeah. [01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:44.000] But if you take that shot at them, you're likely to reanimate their claim against you [01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:49.000] unless you wait until their statute of limitations runs. [01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:52.000] Which it has. [01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:55.000] It actually ran... [01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:58.000] They filed it actually at the end of 2014. [01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:00.000] It just took forever to serve us. [01:13:00.000 --> 01:13:04.000] And the statute of limitations expired in March. [01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:09.000] So they're well past that. [01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:14.000] So the statute of limitations expired just after they filed? [01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:17.000] Yeah, shortly after, a few months after. [01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:22.000] Okay, so you really don't have to worry about this one coming back. [01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:23.000] No. [01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:24.000] That's great. [01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:25.000] That's good. [01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:26.000] Another win. [01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:33.000] The question I have is it seems like they're actually asking me to file it for them. [01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:39.000] And I even looked online and this has not been filed with the court yet. [01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:44.000] So is that in fact something I should file on their behalf? [01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:45.000] Are they just being... [01:13:45.000 --> 01:13:48.000] No, no, you can't file it on their behalf. [01:13:48.000 --> 01:13:54.000] What is the condition of the case? [01:13:54.000 --> 01:13:56.000] They've suited. [01:13:56.000 --> 01:13:58.000] I've answered. [01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:08.000] And they've put in the fact that they put the certificate of service notice in the court. [01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:14.000] And that's the only thing on the court docket, the case docket. [01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:20.000] Okay, there's a couple of considerations here. [01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:30.000] I'm surprised they sent it to you and didn't file it in the case unless they're pulling some sharp practice. [01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:31.000] Right. [01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:40.000] If there's no action in the case for 180 days, you can move to dismiss for failing to prosecute. [01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:49.000] And that has not occurred yet, 180 days. [01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:56.000] Then you should file a...the other issue was subject matter jurisdiction. [01:14:56.000 --> 01:15:01.000] Subject matter jurisdiction can be filed at any time no matter how remote in history. [01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:08.000] Improper service goes to subject matter jurisdiction because it goes to the capacity of the [01:15:08.000 --> 01:15:13.000] plaintiff to invoke subject matter jurisdiction in the court. [01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:21.000] Since they failed to do proper service and in fact did surface in direct violation or [01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:29.000] contravention of a court order, then they lack the legal capacity to invoke subject matter [01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:31.000] jurisdiction in the court. [01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:37.000] You might consider if they don't get that non-suit in quickly to file a challenge subject [01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:39.000] matter jurisdiction. [01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:45.000] If they're not pulling your leg with the non-suit, then they just won't answer and then let the [01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:49.000] court dismiss and it goes away. [01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:55.000] Well, would I not want to...I mean, would I not want them to non-suit it just...I mean, [01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:59.000] like I said, for this, you know, because even though it's without prejudice, it is [01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:00.000] passed as statute of limitations. [01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:05.000] Yes, passed statute of limitations doesn't matter how it gets dismissed. [01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:11.000] Once it's dismissed, when it's dismissed, it's like it never happened. [01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:13.000] So the statute of limitations are still wrong. [01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:14.000] Now they're out of time. [01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:16.000] They can't come back and try again. [01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:21.000] That's why I was suggesting subject matter jurisdiction challenge. [01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:23.000] Okay. [01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:25.000] Yeah. [01:16:25.000 --> 01:16:29.000] And of course, to your knowledge, this is not common practice, the fact that they're [01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:31.000] giving me documents on their behalf. [01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:36.000] Okay, we're about to go to break here and I was hoping Jeff said you could chime in. [01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:39.000] As soon as we come back to break, we'll pick up Jeff. [01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:43.000] Jeff is my resident expert on musicians. [01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:48.000] Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, root of our radio. [01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:52.000] I call it number 512-646-1984. [01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:53.000] Give us a call. [01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:56.000] We've got another half, another 45 minutes. [01:16:56.000 --> 01:17:00.000] We'll be right back. [01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:04.000] Chances are you've heard of My Magic Mud, but have you used it? [01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:08.000] Thousands of people are blown away by the clean and healthy feeling they experience [01:17:08.000 --> 01:17:09.000] after just one use. [01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.000] Here's what Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, has to say about the product. [01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:16.000] Hey everybody, this is Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books. [01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:18.000] Just want to tell everybody about My Magic Mud. [01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:21.000] I use the product and it makes my teeth feel clean and healthy. [01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:23.000] I think it makes them stronger. [01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:25.000] I've got lots of customers that come in and say the same thing. [01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:27.000] You can pick yours up at Brave New Books. [01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:33.000] If that wasn't enough, Dr. Griffin Cole, DDS, who's been featured on the Alex Jones show, loves it too. [01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:37.000] Hi, I'm Dr. Griffin Cole, and I've got to tell you, I really love this Magic Mud product. [01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:41.000] Because charcoal is so absorbent, it's very effective at taking off all the sticky plaque [01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:43.000] and debris that gets stuck on our teeth every day. [01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:45.000] I highly recommend My Magic Mud. [01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:49.000] If you haven't yet experienced My Magic Mud, it's never too late to brighten your smile [01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:51.000] and strengthen your teeth. [01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000] Get your jar of My Magic Mud today at Brave New Books, [01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:00.000] located at 1904 Guadalupe Street, or order online today at MyMagicMud.com. [01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination [01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000] by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. [01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals. [01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:19.000] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. [01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:24.000] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists. [01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. [01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:32.000] In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polymbers. [01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:36.000] We also offer One World Way, Mountain House storable foods, [01:18:36.000 --> 01:18:39.000] Berkey Water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more. [01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:43.000] We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment. [01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:46.000] Call us at 512-646-6440. [01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:51.000] We're located at 7304 Burnet Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. [01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:55.000] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. [01:18:55.000 --> 01:19:16.000] Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullying.com or call 512-646-6440. [01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:36.000] Well, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. [01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:41.000] I was blindsided but now I can see your plans. [01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:46.000] You put the fear in my pocket, took the money from my hands. [01:19:46.000 --> 01:19:55.000] Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. [01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:57.000] Okay, we are back. [01:19:57.000 --> 01:20:01.000] Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Real Raw Radio. [01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:05.000] And we're going to go to bring in Jeff in Maryland. [01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:08.000] Jeff, I got you on here twice. [01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:09.000] Talk to me if you can. [01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:11.000] Okay, can you hear me now? [01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:13.000] Good, that's the one that works. [01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:14.000] Yes, I can. [01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:16.000] Okay, good. [01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:20.000] I'm sorry, I forgot what the caller's name is. [01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:22.000] Philip. [01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:34.000] Philip, you have a litany of FDCPA violations on the part of the lawyer and law firm. [01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:39.000] They continue to attempt to collect without validating, that's one. [01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:48.000] But if you look under 1692 E, and I think it's E5, [01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:56.000] they took an action they couldn't legally take when they were denied alternative service [01:20:56.000 --> 01:21:00.000] and they served you anyway and then basically called you into court. [01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:09.000] And then also down in 1692 F, they used false and deceptive means in their effort to collect the debt. [01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:17.000] And you can probably stack a few more in there, which I would suggest if you can find them, do it. [01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:27.000] Philip, Jeff, what's the likelihood he could get them to pay him? [01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:30.000] This is what we're working on, Randy. [01:21:30.000 --> 01:21:31.000] This is what we're working on. [01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:32.000] We've had this happen a dozen. [01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:42.000] 1692, you've got a violation under 1692 GB, 1692 E, 1692 F, and probably one or two others. [01:21:42.000 --> 01:22:04.000] And when you name the defendants, you can name the law firm and every lawyer that touched the Torah baby, as well as the debt collector. [01:22:04.000 --> 01:22:08.000] Who is the debt collector? [01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:10.000] Pardon? [01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:13.000] Who's the debt collector, Philip? [01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:14.000] Some attorney firm. [01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:17.000] I can't even pronounce half the names in here. [01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:20.000] They're the actual plaintiff? [01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:24.000] Oh, the plaintiff is Portfolio Recovery Associates. [01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:25.000] Okay. [01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:30.000] You name them and you name the law firm and every attorney. [01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:40.000] And here's the thing, under the FDCPA, you can only get up to $1,000 per defendant per case. [01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:46.000] So right off the bat, we've got three defendants and possibly more. [01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:48.000] You with me so far? [01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:53.000] Jeff, didn't they raise that recently to $1,500? [01:22:53.000 --> 01:22:57.000] No, that's what I'm aware of. [01:22:57.000 --> 01:23:01.000] I'm probably thinking of the trebling under TCPA. [01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:03.000] Okay, could be. [01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:04.000] Okay. [01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:08.000] Now here's the other thing I would strongly suggest you do. [01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:15.000] In your wherefore statement, there are two phrases I want you to put in there and be sure to put in there. [01:23:15.000 --> 01:23:19.000] Now you're going to ask for statutory damages, of course, and costs, [01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:33.000] but you want to also put in there a demand for actual damages and a demand for actual damages as they may bear [01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:40.000] because you don't know what they are yet and attorney's fees, if any. [01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:46.000] Once you've got that attorney's fees, if any, you can take that out and you can go get yourself an attorney [01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:50.000] because under FTCPA, there is fee shifting. [01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:56.000] And you don't pay the attorney, the other side does. [01:23:56.000 --> 01:24:00.000] So you're looking at the potential of $3,000 is not more. [01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:08.000] And if you lost sleep and had acid indigestion and... [01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:21.000] It made him lose all his hair, that's why he said big bald spot. [01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:26.000] So what are we up to total here, Jeff? [01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:32.000] We're looking at maybe $5,000 or $6,000. [01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:39.000] But there's a side benefit here to go with it, Randy. [01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:48.000] The side benefit is he will have garnered the experience and the satisfaction of having vindicated his rights [01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:54.000] to be left alone to the peaceful and enjoyment of his property. [01:24:54.000 --> 01:25:06.000] And the idea that they could pay you $6,000 for this legal course, that's great. [01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:13.000] Philip, how much was the original credit card? [01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:16.000] $1,500. [01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:21.000] $1,500? Oh, wonderful. [01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:24.000] Very good chance you'll get to make a nice deal. [01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:27.000] Now we've had a lot of people win these. [01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:32.000] We had a fellow in Madison, Wisconsin, Mark. [01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:37.000] He got one to pay him $6,000 to go away and leave him alone. [01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:46.000] Another one to pay him $3,000 and he was complaining that he didn't have any more credit cards. [01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:51.000] We've had some others much bigger. [01:25:51.000 --> 01:26:00.000] Then what he needs to do is turn his sights on the telemarketers. [01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:04.000] Okay. [01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:09.000] Tell us about how to go after the telemarketers and how we can make money at it. [01:26:09.000 --> 01:26:16.000] Well, if they're using a robo-dialer, and they always are, and they call you on your cell phone, [01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:22.000] and they almost always do, and they don't have express written consent, [01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:25.000] they're liable for $500 per call. [01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:31.000] And if it's egregious, you know, 100, 120, 130 calls, [01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:38.000] you stand a good chance of getting that $500 treble to $1,500. [01:26:38.000 --> 01:26:39.000] Per call? [01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:43.000] Plus actual damages, as they may bear. [01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:45.000] Now, that is interesting. [01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:47.000] I've really been annoyed lately. [01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:55.000] I've got one in particular is I got trapped into a turn that wasn't clear, [01:26:55.000 --> 01:26:58.000] and it trapped me on a toll road. [01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:01.000] And then they never sent me a bill. [01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:07.000] And when I finally got something from them, it was $78. [01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:10.000] And I said, act with you guys. [01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:13.000] I would very much like to sting these guys. [01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:17.000] Well, which state are you in, Todd? [01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:19.000] Texas. [01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:21.000] Oh, okay. [01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:24.000] Is there another state? [01:27:24.000 --> 01:27:34.000] Yes, there is, because Kansas has got a nice little fat statute of $7,500 per call. [01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:36.000] Oh, look at Texas. [01:27:36.000 --> 01:27:37.000] Kansas? [01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:39.000] And I think it's Washington State. [01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:42.000] It's $5,000 per call. [01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:45.000] Wow. [01:27:45.000 --> 01:27:47.000] I think in Texas it's 50. [01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:52.000] Wasn't it Kansas that got the 80-something million? [01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:54.000] I can't hear you, sir. [01:27:54.000 --> 01:28:05.000] Wasn't it Kansas that got the 80-something million judgment against the debt collector recently? [01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:08.000] I know those cases you're talking about. [01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:12.000] I just can't remember what the jurisdiction was, but I don't think it was Kansas. [01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:14.000] It was either Kansas City or Missouri. [01:28:14.000 --> 01:28:18.000] Oh, it was Kansas City, Missouri. [01:28:18.000 --> 01:28:20.000] Okay. [01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:25.000] The woman had a – they tried to collect $1,100 from her, and she didn't know anything. [01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:27.000] This wasn't her debt to start with. [01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:29.000] She tried to tell them they wouldn't believe her. [01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:30.000] They went after her. [01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:32.000] She fought them. [01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:37.000] She got an 80-something million dollar judgment. [01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:38.000] All right. [01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:41.000] And there's a little service, online service, of course. [01:28:41.000 --> 01:28:48.000] You've got $7 or $8 a month that you can have put on most, but not all, cell phone systems [01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:52.000] that will actually trace the call back to its actual source, [01:28:52.000 --> 01:28:55.000] because a lot of the telemarketers like to spoof their caller ID, [01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:58.000] and that's actually a federal crime. [01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:07.000] So you can use – I think it's called TrackCall, T-R-A-C-C-A-L-L, something like that,.com. [01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:16.000] And most – it will perform on most services, cell phone services, but not all of them. [01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:20.000] So you'll have to check out to see if yours is one that they do perform a service on, [01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:24.000] and you can trace the call back. [01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:27.000] I will definitely look that up. [01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:32.000] That's telemarketing. [01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:33.000] Okay. [01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:34.000] Okay. [01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:35.000] That is good news. [01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:44.000] And then – and Philip, don't hesitate to download the recording of this call and play it again, [01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:48.000] because a lot of details have been thrown at you very quickly. [01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:49.000] Okay. [01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:50.000] Hang on. [01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:51.000] We're about to do a break. [01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:53.000] Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Root of Our Radio. [01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:57.000] Call it at number 512-646-1984. [01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:03.000] We'll be right back. [01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:06.000] Could science one day delete our memories and rewrite them with new ones? [01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:10.000] Lawyers and philosophers are already debating what it might mean. [01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:11.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:15.000] Back to talk about the morality of altering memory in a moment. [01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:17.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:21.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:28.000] So protect your rights. [01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:32.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:33.000] Privacy. [01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:34.000] It's worth hanging on to. [01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:37.000] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:41.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:46.000] Imagine this. [01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:51.000] Doctors insert chemicals into your brain that completely erase your memory. [01:30:51.000 --> 01:30:53.000] Wiped clean, your mind becomes a blank slate, [01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:57.000] ready to accept brand new memories, perhaps even a new personality. [01:30:57.000 --> 01:30:59.000] It sounds like a scene from Blade Runner, [01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:03.000] the sci-fi classic about robots with artificial memories. [01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:06.000] But new research suggests human memories can be overwritten, [01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:09.000] like digital files on a laptop. [01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:11.000] That's because scientists have found a molecule called zip [01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:14.000] that shuts down another one called PKM zeta, [01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:16.000] and that's what preserves your memories. [01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:22.000] Take it away and your old identity could be, what you might call it, oh yeah, reformatted. [01:31:22.000 --> 01:31:31.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000] Thousands of my fellow first responders have died. [01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:50.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:51.000] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:55.000] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:58.000] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:03.000] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. [01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:06.000] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:09.000] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, [01:32:09.000 --> 01:32:11.000] but good luck getting them to pay for it. [01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:15.000] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:16.000] That's why you have insurance, [01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:19.000] and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you [01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:21.000] with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:27.000] And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. [01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:32.000] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:39.000] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:41.000] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, [01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:46.000] and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:51.000] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.000] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:02.000] May not actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:12.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:37.000] Chippin' on your mom, chippin' on your daddy. Chippin' on your grandpa and the granny. [01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:42.000] Chippin' on me, chippin' on your baby. Chippin' on your family, whole family. [01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:47.000] Chippin' on your dog and the cat around me. Chippin' on the beef and you still go eat it. [01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:52.000] Chippin' on the fish, them all in the sea. Chippin' on the shark and the whale around me. [01:33:52.000 --> 01:33:56.000] Feminist, humankind gone too crazy. Get the connecting when they want to read it. [01:33:56.000 --> 01:34:01.000] Social security, they go tell me. Number with them, give me them, repeat after me. [01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:03.000] Okay, we are back. [01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:05.000] Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Our Radio. [01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:07.000] And we're talking to Phillip in Texas. [01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:11.000] Okay, Phillip, you got any ideas? [01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:13.000] I do. I do about some future lawsuits. [01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:22.000] I still probably call back again tomorrow to discuss with the lawyer to see what I should do about this non-suit, [01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:28.000] if that's standard that she's aware of, that I kind of practiced. [01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:34.000] When you filed your answer, did you make a counterclaim? [01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:40.000] You know, honestly, it's been a while and I don't know and I don't have it right in front of me. [01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:47.000] Oh, okay. So you might want to check if you made a counterclaim and they non-suit. [01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:50.000] They can't non-suit your counterclaim. [01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:52.000] Right. I don't think I made a counterclaim yet. [01:34:52.000 --> 01:34:56.000] So they probably wouldn't have had to non-suit if they did. [01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:09.000] And if you want to sue, then you might come back and just file an amended answer and include it across your counterclaim. [01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:14.000] Okay. Thank you, Phillip, and we'll talk to you tomorrow night. [01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:16.000] All right. Thank you, sir. [01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:19.000] Okey-doke. Now we're going to go to Ralph in Texas. [01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:21.000] Hello, Ralph. [01:35:21.000 --> 01:35:23.000] Hello, Randy. How are you? [01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:24.000] I am good. [01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:27.000] How do you recognize, Ralph? Is this your first call? [01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:31.000] No, no. I have talked to you, I think, twice before. [01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:34.000] Oh, okay. [01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:40.000] So I don't have a real estate issue, so I don't tune in very often. [01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:48.000] I used to tune in a lot, but then I got busy and so this question is about a topic we have covered before [01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:52.000] that I heard sometime in the last year or possibly in the archives. [01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:57.000] I think we covered this in the last year. I was hoping you could elaborate on it a little bit more for me. [01:35:57.000 --> 01:36:05.000] It is about court-appointed attorneys who took a motion to withdraw. [01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:12.000] Okay. Most likely this is a criminal case? [01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:14.000] Correct. [01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:27.000] Okay. It is frowned upon for a court-appointed attorney in a criminal case to withdraw, [01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:30.000] but they will allow them to withdraw. [01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:39.000] And the way I look at it, if I have a court-appointed attorney who wants to withdraw, [01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:52.000] that is the one I want because Julius was on and he was annoying his court-appointed attorney [01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:55.000] and the court-appointed attorney got frustrated and said, [01:36:55.000 --> 01:37:09.000] look, you got to understand, my only purpose here is to ensure that you don't have anything to appeal. [01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:12.000] That was a big time oops. [01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:22.000] But what we do is to talk about how to, if you want your attorney to fight for your rights, [01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:25.000] you have to make it so that he can. [01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:32.000] I know court-appointed attorneys get a lot of grief, but consider a lot of these guys just get out of law school, [01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:40.000] they got this huge student loan they have to pay off, and we're graduating 40,000 lawyers a year, [01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:43.000] so it's really tough out there. [01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:51.000] So one way they can pay their office bills is by being court-appointed counsel, and they get chump change. [01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:59.000] Now, I'm in Wise County, Texas, if you get a court-appointed counsel, they'll pay you 250 bucks [01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:03.000] if you get the client to take a deal. [01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:07.000] If you don't, they'll pay you 100 and a quarter. [01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:10.000] So what's he supposed to do? [01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:16.000] He's going to come in and vigorously adjudicate your rights for chump change, [01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:22.000] and if he does vigorously adjudicate your rights, they're not going to appoint him to anymore, [01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:28.000] and the judge is likely to kick his behind in the next case he brings. [01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:34.000] So how do you get your lawyer to work in your behalf? [01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:44.000] Well, you consider everything's about relationships, and you can think of the courts as a four-sided chessboard. [01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:52.000] You set it one side, to your right is your counsel, to your left is counsel for the other side, [01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:55.000] and across from you is the judge. [01:38:55.000 --> 01:38:58.000] You have a relationship with your counsel. [01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:05.000] Your counsel has a relationship with opposing counsel, because they're both in the same profession. [01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:13.000] They sit across from one another all the time, and both of them have a relationship with the judge. [01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:16.000] You're the one at the distinct disadvantage here, [01:39:16.000 --> 01:39:26.000] unless you can invoke the relationship of your lawyer with the judge and the lawyer on the other side. [01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:29.000] See, the judge, he would rather be out playing golf. [01:39:29.000 --> 01:39:33.000] He don't want to be in here listening to complicated motions. [01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:38.000] He wants to listen to the deal and accept the deal and go play golf. [01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:44.000] You screw up his golf game, he's not going to be happy with you as an attorney. [01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:54.000] So if you want your attorney to act in your behalf, you have to give your attorney plausible deniability. [01:39:54.000 --> 01:40:01.000] When I had the DPS knock out one of my teeth at the Secretary of State's building, [01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:06.000] because I'd called the police on them, called 911 on them, [01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:15.000] I went into court, and it's kind of a long story, but they called me in just to see if I had an attorney. [01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:19.000] And when the judge called me up, I said, she said, are you Randall Kelton? [01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:22.000] I said, yes, Your Honor, I am. [01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:26.000] And I have this notice to appear, but it doesn't tell me why I'm supposed to be here. [01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:28.000] You want to tell me what I'm doing here? [01:40:28.000 --> 01:40:32.000] Oh, well, Mr. Kelton, we wanted to find out if you had counsel. [01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:36.000] Well, Your Honor, I have 28.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, [01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:44.000] and it lists all those things you can call me into court for to see if I have an attorney, not one of them. [01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:49.000] Well, that kind of tensed her up, but she had already been warned about who I was. [01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:52.000] This was Ron Earl's daughter. [01:40:52.000 --> 01:41:00.000] Ron Earl, 25-year district attorney, the guy who took out Tom Delaney, did it illegal. [01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:10.000] Well, this is his daughter, and I thought she's probably the most political judge I can get, and everything's political. [01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:14.000] So the politics here would work best for me. [01:41:14.000 --> 01:41:19.000] So I kind of backed off on her, and she said, well, Mr. Kelton, we needed to see if you have counsel. [01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:22.000] Do you have an attorney? No, Your Honor, I do not. [01:41:22.000 --> 01:41:24.000] Are you going to hire counsel? No. [01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:26.000] Would you like me to appoint you counsel? [01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:28.000] Well, you can do anything you want to. [01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:30.000] Well, Mr. Kelton, I'm going to appoint you counsel. [01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:36.000] I said, well, if you do, Judge, make sure you appoint one you really don't like. [01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:41.000] I am setting up the lawyer to have plausible deniability. [01:41:41.000 --> 01:41:47.000] I want the judge to think the lawyer has an unruly client. [01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:52.000] So she kind of laughed and said, well, we have an attorney wheel, and you get the next one. [01:41:52.000 --> 01:41:54.000] So you're off the hook. Yes, I am. [01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:56.000] So they appointed me counsel. [01:41:56.000 --> 01:41:58.000] First thing, he's telling me how things are going to go. [01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:02.000] I said, no, no, no, that's not how they're going to go. [01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:04.000] This is how they're going to go. [01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:07.000] You're going to go to the judge. It has to be removed from this case. [01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:10.000] I'm going to go to the judge and tell her, don't you dare remove him in this case. [01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:15.000] He's my counsel of choice, and he's under contract. [01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:17.000] The lawyer said, well, I'm not under contract with you. [01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:19.000] I'm under contract with the state. [01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:22.000] I said, yes, you are, but I'm the intended third party beneficiary, [01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:27.000] and I have standing to enforce the contract. [01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:30.000] And I told him, then the judge will go ahead and remove you from the case. [01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:32.000] He said, yes, you will. [01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:37.000] Then I get to sue the judge for interfering with the contract. [01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:44.000] And the lawyer got this look on his face that said, he's going to give me this board. [01:42:44.000 --> 01:42:49.000] So later that night, I hadn't told him everything. [01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:53.000] He had his home number on his card, so I called him. [01:42:53.000 --> 01:42:57.000] I told him that earlier today, I didn't tell you everything. [01:42:57.000 --> 01:43:02.000] I have a strategy, and I'm going to do a radio show to explain that strategy. [01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:03.000] You might want to listen. [01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:05.000] Well, Mr. Kalten, why don't you just tell me what it is? [01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:07.000] I said, okay. [01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:12.000] I have a set of motions with 17 due process violations in them. [01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:16.000] You will adequately adjudicate every single one of those. [01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:21.000] You fail to adequately adjudicate a single issue in my motions. [01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:24.000] And I'll barg review. [01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:25.000] Pattern interruption. [01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:27.000] Generally, when I do a pattern interruption, you can count. [01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:31.000] It takes about three seconds for him to get your feet back under him. [01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:37.000] One, two, three, four, five. [01:43:37.000 --> 01:43:43.000] Mr. Kalten, you would greet me in a heartbeat. [01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:46.000] I'll pick this up on the other side. [01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:50.000] But this is about not giving your lawyer a hard time, [01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:53.000] but giving them the opportunity to actually do the job [01:43:53.000 --> 01:43:55.000] without having to be afraid of the judge. [01:43:55.000 --> 01:44:00.000] Randy Kalten, Debra Stevens, We'll Be Right Back. [01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000] You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics? [01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:07.000] Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve? [01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000] What? [01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:12.000] If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity. [01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:16.000] Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, [01:44:16.000 --> 01:44:19.000] I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age. [01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:22.000] I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found [01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:25.000] in almost every home in America, the television. [01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:29.000] Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity. [01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:30.000] But there is hope. [01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:32.000] The staff at Brave New Books have helped me [01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000] and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover. [01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:38.000] And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading [01:44:38.000 --> 01:44:43.000] and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested. [01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:46.000] So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, [01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:50.000] then you need to call 512-480-2503 [01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:54.000] or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com. [01:44:54.000 --> 01:44:57.000] Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include [01:44:57.000 --> 01:45:00.000] discernment in enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning. [01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:07.000] Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary. [01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:11.000] The affordable, easy-to-understand core CD course [01:45:11.000 --> 01:45:15.000] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:31.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney [01:45:31.000 --> 01:45:34.000] with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:47.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, [01:45:47.000 --> 01:45:52.000] forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:56.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner [01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:04.000] or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:04.000 --> 01:46:27.000] Music playing. [01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:56.000] Music playing. [01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:58.000] Okay, we are back. [01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:01.000] Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio. [01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:04.000] We're talking to Ralph in Texas. [01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:08.000] What I was doing is setting up the lawyer [01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:12.000] so that he would have plausible deniability. [01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:14.000] When I told him I would bar-agree with him, he said, [01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:16.000] you'd bar-agree with me? [01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:18.000] I said, in a heartbeat. [01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:20.000] And he said, well, I don't like to be threatened. [01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:22.000] I said, well, I wasn't trying to threaten you. [01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:24.000] I was just trying to give you a heads-up. [01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:27.000] If you want me more of those, we'll just take this as it comes. [01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:28.000] Thank you. Good night. [01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:30.000] I hung up on him. [01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:32.000] He called me at 8.30 the next morning. [01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:35.000] I didn't have my glasses on, so I didn't notice who it was, [01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:37.000] and I answered. [01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:39.000] And he was apologizing all over the place [01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:42.000] because I guess he had time to think about it. [01:47:42.000 --> 01:47:43.000] But he was terrified. [01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:45.000] He was terrified I was going to end his career. [01:47:45.000 --> 01:47:48.000] I had a bar-agree with him his first year in practice. [01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:51.000] They had canceled his malpractice insurance immediately. [01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:56.000] I had no intention of doing that to him, but he didn't know that. [01:47:56.000 --> 01:48:02.000] So we went through the proceedings, and at one point, [01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:05.000] I'm standing outside the bar, and he's up at the bench [01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:08.000] with the prosecutor and the judge. [01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:13.000] And my lawyer comes over to me and said, Mr. Kelton, [01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:16.000] the prosecutor said she knows who you are, [01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:18.000] and if you start filing criminal charges, [01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:22.000] she's going to charge you with tampering with the government document. [01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:24.000] Oh, she said that, didn't she? [01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:25.000] Hang on. [01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:28.000] I reached in my case, and I pulled out a stack of 30. [01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:31.000] I said, here, I got about 30 here. [01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:35.000] I need you to get over here to verify these criminal affidavits [01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:39.000] in accordance with her duty and authorization under Article 2.06, [01:48:39.000 --> 01:48:41.000] Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:42.000] And I pointed at her. [01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:43.000] You, come here. [01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:47.000] And she kind of backed up against the bench. [01:48:47.000 --> 01:48:50.000] And I turned to my lawyer and handed them to him. [01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:52.000] He held up his hands with his palms out and said, [01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:53.000] I'm not going to take them. [01:48:53.000 --> 01:48:54.000] I'm not going to take them. [01:48:54.000 --> 01:48:57.000] Take them, you chickens! [01:48:57.000 --> 01:48:59.000] Right in front of the judge. [01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:01.000] The judge is watching this. [01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:05.000] He refuses to take them, and he runs up by the bench. [01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:09.000] And then the judge recessed for lunch. [01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:15.000] He calls me while I'm at lunch saying the judge dismissed the case. [01:49:15.000 --> 01:49:18.000] Did you see what happened? [01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:24.000] The judge dismissed the case to protect my lawyer from me. [01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:25.000] Oh, yes. [01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:26.000] Okay. [01:49:26.000 --> 01:49:27.000] Yeah. [01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:31.000] If you're going to be in each case, and you have court-appointed counsel, [01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:35.000] court-appointed counsel don't have to be your buddy. [01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:37.000] He don't have to like you. [01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:40.000] The judge doesn't have to like you. [01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:42.000] They go through so many cases. [01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:43.000] They don't care. [01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:47.000] The only way you're going to get them to rule outside the norm [01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:50.000] is they have to have a personal reason. [01:49:50.000 --> 01:49:53.000] And here's this new attorney just getting started, [01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:57.000] and he gets one of these prosaics from hell [01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:03.000] who just starts throwing around bar grievances and complaints of all kinds, [01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:06.000] and can just mess up this guy's career. [01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:12.000] Let's just get him out of here and go on to the next one. [01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:14.000] Okay. [01:50:14.000 --> 01:50:20.000] Is that what you were referring to about handling the deal with lawyers? [01:50:20.000 --> 01:50:22.000] Well, that's some good information. [01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:25.000] My case is a little bit different. [01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:26.000] Excuse me. [01:50:26.000 --> 01:50:30.000] But what I was thinking of was whenever you mentioned once before [01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:36.000] that before the judge granted the attorney's withdrawal of counsel, [01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:43.000] you threatened to sue the judge for a tortious interference with a contract. [01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:45.000] And I was wondering how that ever went. [01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:46.000] Okay. [01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:48.000] No, I did that. [01:50:48.000 --> 01:50:52.000] I told the attorney I would do that. [01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:56.000] I'd never told the judge, and I never would. [01:50:56.000 --> 01:50:59.000] When you're dealing in court, [01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:06.000] one of the things prosaics tend to do a lot is give fair warning. [01:51:06.000 --> 01:51:12.000] They say, oh, these are my rights, and this law says you're supposed to do this, [01:51:12.000 --> 01:51:15.000] and if you don't do this, I can do this to you and that to you. [01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:17.000] No, no, no, no, no. [01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:20.000] Never do that. [01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:23.000] Never give a fair warning. [01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:26.000] Bushwhack is much better. [01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:30.000] If you give fair warning, they'll treat it as a threat. [01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:35.000] No matter how you cloak fair warning, they will call it a threat. [01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:39.000] It's likely to get you sanctions, contempt of court, all kind of stuff. [01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:42.000] So never, ever threaten the court. [01:51:42.000 --> 01:51:46.000] Now, you threaten them until the lawyer is going to do it [01:51:46.000 --> 01:51:50.000] because the lawyer has a relationship with the judge. [01:51:50.000 --> 01:51:55.000] So even if you want the judge to know, you do it through the lawyer. [01:51:55.000 --> 01:51:56.000] Go ahead. [01:51:56.000 --> 01:51:58.000] I can't be interrupting you. [01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:01.000] Well, the attorney is wanting to withdraw his counsel [01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:07.000] because I've gone behind his back and contacted the DA and the court [01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:12.000] and because of bar grieving. [01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:18.000] The problem is I did not go behind his back and contact the DA and the court, [01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:22.000] and I did bar grieving because he's been my attorney for six months, [01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:27.000] and he's done absolutely nothing. [01:52:27.000 --> 01:52:36.000] Well, just tell him, if you file to withdraw, I'll sue you for malpractice. [01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:38.000] You're under contract. [01:52:38.000 --> 01:52:43.000] Fulfill your contract. [01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:46.000] I don't care if you don't want to do your job. [01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:49.000] You're the one that accepted the contract. [01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:50.000] Fulfill it. [01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:52.000] That's what I told him. [01:52:52.000 --> 01:52:54.000] I said, look, I bargaged you. [01:52:54.000 --> 01:52:55.000] Get over it. [01:52:55.000 --> 01:52:56.000] Do your job. [01:52:56.000 --> 01:52:58.000] You went to school for this. [01:52:58.000 --> 01:52:59.000] I didn't. [01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:04.000] We had a tag today with six emails, and his last email said, [01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:06.000] I'm not going to debate this any further. [01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:09.000] I'm going, okay, fine. [01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:14.000] But anyway, I was just wondering, I do not want him off the case. [01:53:14.000 --> 01:53:16.000] He's been to school for this. [01:53:16.000 --> 01:53:17.000] I have not. [01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:22.000] He's telling me all these lies, and so if that's his ground for wanting to [01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:25.000] withdraw, well, he made a mistake and told me what they are, [01:53:25.000 --> 01:53:27.000] so I'll be ready for him. [01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:28.000] Okay, hold on. [01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:31.000] It's okay if he does withdraw. [01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:34.000] You really don't care. [01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:39.000] You just don't want him to withdraw with your permission because the more [01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:44.000] grief you give him, you know, we had Jeff on at the beginning, [01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:47.000] and boy, nobody wanted to represent him. [01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:50.000] They didn't want anything to do with him. [01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:53.000] So you give this guy a lot of grief and he withdraws. [01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:58.000] They're going to appoint some other poor schmuck who's going to get stuck [01:53:58.000 --> 01:54:01.000] with this pro se from hell. [01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:09.000] This lawyer is going to try to keep you from bar grieving him. [01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:16.000] And he comes to the table with plausible deniability already. [01:54:16.000 --> 01:54:21.000] Judge, you're appointing this guy to just bar grieve my buddy over here? [01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:24.000] You've got to cover my behind here. [01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:28.000] Well, the thing is they don't have a case against me, [01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:31.000] and I'm ready to get this thing over with. [01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:34.000] I've been without a trial date for six months, [01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:38.000] and the reason they're not giving me a trial date is I'm not real sure, [01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:43.000] but they're hoping I'll die of a heart attack maybe because they have no case. [01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:44.000] Wait a minute. [01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:48.000] Have you filed a motion for speedy trial? [01:54:48.000 --> 01:54:50.000] No, I have not done a motion for speedy trial, [01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:53.000] and before you go any further, I heard you mention something earlier, [01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:57.000] about 180 days failure to prosecute, so you get a dismissal. [01:54:57.000 --> 01:54:59.000] I'm going to investigate that. [01:54:59.000 --> 01:55:00.000] Okay, hold on. [01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:02.000] That's different. [01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:03.000] That's different. [01:55:03.000 --> 01:55:05.000] That's civil. [01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:09.000] I asked for a continuance right out of the gate, [01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:15.000] so I'm told that the speedy trial is out the window because I asked for a continuance, [01:55:15.000 --> 01:55:18.000] and I asked for a continuance for a reason. [01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:19.000] Okay. [01:55:19.000 --> 01:55:21.000] No, that's not true. [01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:33.000] The only part of the tolling of the limitations is the delay that was caused by your continuance. [01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:35.000] Only that portion. [01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:40.000] If you got a two-week continuance, then it doesn't hold for two weeks. [01:55:40.000 --> 01:55:50.000] However, 3202A of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure was passed by the legislature deliberately, [01:55:50.000 --> 01:55:53.000] so it would get tossed. [01:55:53.000 --> 01:55:57.000] They legislated a decision by the court. [01:55:57.000 --> 01:55:58.000] It's the second time they did it. [01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:00.000] They knew it would get tossed. [01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:04.000] There is no speedy trial statute, [01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:08.000] so the courts want to say there is no such thing as a speedy trial, [01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:13.000] but there's still the constitutional right to the speedy trial. [01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:15.000] Where is that? [01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:19.000] The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:20.000] Okay. [01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:27.000] The courts overturned it because it mandated a judicial decision. [01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:31.000] The legislature did that on purpose because they'd already had it thrown out for that once, [01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:35.000] and they did the same thing again. [01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:37.000] Instead of saying the judge shall dismiss, [01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:42.000] they should have said the defendant has a right to dismissal, [01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:44.000] and then the judge would be put in a position. [01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:48.000] They deliberately didn't do that so that we don't have a speedy trial statute, [01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:49.000] but we still have a speedy trial right. [01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:50.000] Okay. [01:56:50.000 --> 01:56:52.000] Get a motion for speedy trial in. [01:56:52.000 --> 01:56:57.000] The case law says if you don't demand speedy trial, then you waive it. [01:56:57.000 --> 01:56:59.000] So get the demand in, [01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:03.000] and any delay that is your fault counts against you. [01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:06.000] That's all. [01:57:06.000 --> 01:57:12.000] If I had a court date of December the 11th, 2014, [01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:16.000] that court date was postponed without a new date [01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:18.000] because I got a court-appointed attorney, [01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:25.000] and he needed time to prepare for trial, and now it is July of 2015, [01:57:25.000 --> 01:57:30.000] and no one has issued or asked for a court date. [01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:32.000] What is up with that? [01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:37.000] Have you demanded that your lawyer ask for a court date? [01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:40.000] I have demanded my attorney to do two things. [01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:46.000] He did neither one of those, and so I barged in. [01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:48.000] But I didn't know. No one's asked for a court date. [01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:50.000] I have asked for a... [01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:53.000] I put in a motion for an examining trial, [01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:56.000] and I haven't heard back on it yet. [01:57:56.000 --> 01:57:59.000] Yeah, they don't even know what that is anymore. [01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:01.000] Okay, we'll have more time tomorrow night. [01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:04.000] Why don't you call in tomorrow night? [01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:07.000] We'll do our four-hour info marathon, [01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:10.000] but we are out of time this evening. [01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:12.000] Thank you, Ralph. [01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:14.000] I look forward to talking to you tomorrow. [01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:16.000] Terry, I'm sorry we didn't get to you. [01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:18.000] Call in tomorrow night. We'll have more time. [01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:20.000] This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, [01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:24.000] and we love your radio. [01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:29.000] If you have some time, look at our sponsors. [01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:32.000] Solicit our sponsors and help support this radio station [01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:34.000] and keep us broadcasting. [01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:37.000] We need all the help we can get. [01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:40.000] Besides, Randy needs to be refunded. [01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:44.000] Thank you all for listening, and good night. [01:59:10.000 --> 01:59:12.000] ...Bibles for America. [01:59:12.000 --> 01:59:17.000] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 [01:59:17.000 --> 01:59:21.000] or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:23.000] This translation is highly accurate [01:59:23.000 --> 01:59:26.000] and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:28.000] plus charts and maps, [01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:30.000] and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:36.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, [01:59:36.000 --> 01:59:41.000] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:45.000] That's 888-551-0102 [01:59:45.000 --> 01:59:50.000] or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:50.000 --> 01:59:56.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network [01:59:56.000 --> 02:00:06.000] at logosradio.com.