[00:00.000 --> 00:05.840] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly [00:05.840 --> 00:13.520] bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop [00:13.520 --> 00:21.280] into the tides of the alternative. [00:21.280 --> 00:27.840] Markets for the 17th of June opened up with gold at $1,176.41 an ounce, silver $16.01 [00:27.840 --> 00:34.080] an ounce, Texas crude $59.97 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $250 [00:34.080 --> 00:41.000] U.S. currency. [00:41.000 --> 00:46.720] Today in history, Wednesday, June 17, 1789, the National Constituent Assembly, or National [00:46.720 --> 00:50.280] Assembly as it was more popularly known, was formed. [00:50.280 --> 00:53.880] Members had been meeting and planning this new assembly since the 13th of that same month [00:53.880 --> 00:54.880] and year. [00:54.880 --> 00:58.240] It was a revolutionary assembly formed by the representatives of the Third Estate during [00:58.240 --> 01:05.240] the French Revolution. [01:05.240 --> 01:09.640] In recent news, over 200 pages related to Pope Francis' encyclical on climate change [01:09.640 --> 01:11.440] were leaked earlier this week. [01:11.440 --> 01:15.560] The Vatican has asked that reporters and news outlets refrain from revealing or commenting [01:15.560 --> 01:23.240] on the details until the documents are officially released tomorrow. [01:23.240 --> 01:27.080] The European Union reached a preliminary agreement today to extend economic sanctions which would [01:27.080 --> 01:31.960] have expired at the end of next month until January of next year against Russia in response [01:31.960 --> 01:33.840] to their role in the Ukraine conflict. [01:33.840 --> 01:38.600] The Baltic states were seeking tougher sanctions but still conceded to the extension of existing [01:38.600 --> 01:42.920] ones, which restrict access to capital by Russian banks and companies, including asset [01:42.920 --> 01:46.520] freezing and travel restrictions on selected individuals and companies. [01:46.520 --> 01:49.440] The sanctions are expected to be adopted formally next week. [01:49.440 --> 01:53.160] In March, European Union leaders agreed that the sanctions would not be lifted until the [01:53.160 --> 01:55.480] Minsk Accords are met. [01:55.480 --> 01:57.000] Not everyone is on board though. [01:57.000 --> 02:02.060] Greece's Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, before her April trip to Moscow, condemned the sanctions [02:02.060 --> 02:05.760] and called for an end to antagonistic relations with Russia. [02:05.760 --> 02:09.640] Russian diplomats aren't happy either, obviously, as they have been seeking to influence the [02:09.640 --> 02:14.920] vote on the continuation of these sanctions. [02:14.920 --> 02:20.780] Uber, after completely getting up and leaving San Antonio earlier this year for what it [02:20.780 --> 02:24.680] called the most burdensome regulations in the nation, is ready to open up new dialogue [02:24.680 --> 02:26.920] with local leaders about the potential return. [02:26.920 --> 02:30.880] Uber rep Debbie Hancock said that the people of San Antonio made their voices loud and [02:30.880 --> 02:32.760] clear that they want Uber. [02:32.760 --> 02:36.920] Mayor Taylor has a unique opportunity to take a major step towards accomplishing this and [02:36.920 --> 02:38.440] we look forward to working with her. [02:38.440 --> 02:42.600] At least one other city council member, Alan Warwick, has spoken out with similar sentiments. [02:42.600 --> 02:46.520] He said that, I think the information that we have now is a lot more robust. [02:46.520 --> 02:49.960] We have a number of additional cities and states that have made decisions on Uber and [02:49.960 --> 02:52.400] that we have a lot more information to bring to the table. [02:52.400 --> 03:22.320] This has been your Lowdown for June 17, 2015. [04:23.040 --> 04:23.320] Okay. [04:24.040 --> 04:26.000] I'm having a little issue starting out. [04:26.000 --> 04:39.280] Uh, this is Randy Kelton, uh, Thursday, June the 16th, 18th, June the 18th, 2015. [04:39.280 --> 04:41.000] I'm a little bit discombobulated. [04:42.520 --> 04:52.280] This shooting in North Carolina, I have found it much more disturbing than I would have [04:52.280 --> 04:53.000] expected. [04:53.000 --> 04:56.440] I mean, it's very disturbing, but we have bad things happening all the time. [04:57.800 --> 05:02.080] This is, I'm absolutely mortified. [05:04.520 --> 05:15.960] At this point in our history, I was hoping that for the most part, the public in [05:15.960 --> 05:26.680] general was beyond such incredible ignorance and prejudice to see that we [05:26.680 --> 05:34.800] still have people acting out in ways that are just so incredibly stupid. [05:37.920 --> 05:40.080] What was this about? [05:40.080 --> 05:46.200] I know I may offend some Christians by this, but I don't mean to. [05:47.200 --> 05:53.880] If in fact, God created man, he created us terribly, terribly flawed. [05:56.200 --> 06:02.880] And these flaws seem to keep coming out in the most horrendous ways. [06:02.880 --> 06:10.600] Uh, in here recently in Texas, we got, uh, they passed the right to carry if you have [06:10.600 --> 06:13.280] a concealed carry permit. [06:14.880 --> 06:18.920] And I would hope that a lot of people start carrying guns. [06:21.000 --> 06:27.600] And that's not so that they're wind up shooting somebody with one of those, but [06:27.600 --> 06:36.840] so that these kinds of things like what happened today will cease this little [06:36.840 --> 06:41.240] coward, he didn't go to make a statement. [06:42.360 --> 06:46.400] He didn't, uh, stand up and do something important. [06:47.560 --> 06:51.640] He went out and had come up with an excuse to go to a Turkey shoot. [06:51.640 --> 06:59.560] The last thing, guys like this wants a gun fight if there had been one other person [06:59.560 --> 07:06.840] there, um, there was a shooting in Colorado before the Columbine and before [07:06.840 --> 07:13.960] the movie theater incident in a church where someone came into a church and pulled [07:13.960 --> 07:19.760] a weapon and they had a security guard for whatever reason, I don't know, but [07:19.760 --> 07:26.480] they had a security guard, a female, tall, slender, good-looking blonde female, not [07:26.960 --> 07:33.160] who you would expect to be a security guard, a rough and tumble security guard. [07:33.160 --> 07:37.720] But this guy pulled a weapon out, threatened to shoot everybody in the building. [07:37.720 --> 07:40.280] She walked down the aisle with her weapon in her hand. [07:41.040 --> 07:42.200] He fired at her. [07:42.200 --> 07:43.560] She fired at him. [07:43.560 --> 07:49.400] She walked into blistering fire and shot this guy down before he killed anybody. [07:51.880 --> 07:54.480] I don't have, you know, I don't own guns. [07:54.600 --> 07:57.200] I think everybody should have guns, but I don't own them. [07:57.920 --> 08:00.920] And it's because I spent time on the sharp end. [08:00.920 --> 08:07.480] So I don't advocate a shooting one another, but I'm certain if this guy came into that [08:07.480 --> 08:12.160] church, knowing there was going to be somebody there pointing a pistol at him, [08:12.160 --> 08:14.920] he would have found some other way to make his point. [08:16.280 --> 08:21.920] And this little coward who pulled this thing off in South Carolina, certainly [08:21.920 --> 08:27.120] if he thought somebody in that room had a pistol themselves, he would not have [08:27.120 --> 08:30.600] went there to have himself a turkey shoot because they never want a gunfight. [08:34.120 --> 08:38.680] I know a lot of people may not agree with me and I feel real frustrated even [08:38.680 --> 08:43.000] going to this position, but people are flawed. [08:43.760 --> 08:49.080] They've always been flawed and they've always been killing each other. [08:50.920 --> 08:59.080] It has been my experience that an armed society is a polite society. [09:00.880 --> 09:05.880] I've spent time around people who were all armed. [09:05.880 --> 09:09.320] And anybody who's been in one of these positions, and you don't see these [09:09.320 --> 09:10.440] folks shooting each other. [09:11.480 --> 09:13.960] Now they have an enemy out there and they'll shoot at the enemy, but when [09:13.960 --> 09:18.040] they're around each other, makes no difference how drunk they get, makes no [09:18.040 --> 09:19.920] difference how angry they get at one another. [09:19.920 --> 09:29.360] They never, ever even imagine pulling a weapon because when everybody's armed, [09:29.840 --> 09:34.200] a weapon is not only not an infanticide, but it's a weapon that's [09:34.200 --> 09:40.920] only not an advantage, it's an incredible disadvantage. [09:43.240 --> 09:49.960] So I hate to use this to advocate for more guns when guns are the source of the [09:49.960 --> 10:00.280] problem, but I can't imagine another way to handle this so long as we have the [10:00.280 --> 10:07.600] second amendment, so long as we have no intention of allowing the government to [10:07.600 --> 10:16.320] take our guns away from us, we owe it to ourselves to use our guns in a way that [10:16.320 --> 10:18.240] will prevent this kind of stuff. [10:18.240 --> 10:24.600] And I'm frustrated to the point that I'm about talking to myself into getting a [10:24.600 --> 10:30.240] permit because I want people to carry guns, but since I hate them so much, I [10:30.240 --> 10:37.280] don't want to carry myself, but rather than just advocate this position, I [10:37.280 --> 10:40.080] guess it's time to step up. [10:41.800 --> 10:48.000] Anyway, enough about that, that depresses me too much to even think about it. [10:49.320 --> 10:52.400] I have something else, we didn't have our phone lines open, we had the phone [10:52.400 --> 11:00.840] lines open all night, I got a letter the other day from the Tarrant County Grand [11:00.840 --> 11:07.040] Jury, most of you who listen a lot are aware that I have filed some criminal [11:07.040 --> 11:14.680] charges with the Dallas County District Attorney, I'm sorry, against the Dallas [11:14.680 --> 11:17.280] County District Attorney with the Tarrant County District Attorney. [11:17.280 --> 11:22.920] Now, if you listen a lot, you know I go over this quite a bit, and I don't mean [11:22.920 --> 11:33.680] to sound pedantic, but I do need people to internally understand how this part [11:33.680 --> 11:40.840] of the law is supposed to work because it is so different from how it actually [11:40.840 --> 11:49.000] works, many of you may have seen the, or heard the stories about the shooting in [11:49.000 --> 11:56.440] Philadelphia, where was it, Philadelphia was in Ohio, I think it was in Ohio, [11:56.480 --> 12:01.840] where these policemen shot this 12 year old boy, within two seconds of pulling up [12:01.840 --> 12:07.480] on the scene, they ordered him to drop his weapon, and it appears that when he [12:07.480 --> 12:12.880] moved the weapon to do that, the policemen just shot him dead, because the [12:12.880 --> 12:20.440] policemen just had come to be absolutely terrified of us, but the District [12:20.440 --> 12:28.440] Attorney refused to take any action, and the citizens took a complaint to a [12:28.440 --> 12:35.880] municipal court judge, and they talked about this as if it was some arcane law, [12:35.880 --> 12:48.960] it was no such thing, it was very basic due process, but our police and the [12:48.960 --> 12:56.000] procedures that they used have been adjusted toward what I call administrative [12:56.000 --> 13:03.000] convenience and adjudicative expediency, to the point that the code and the [13:03.000 --> 13:08.280] practice don't look anything like one another, to the point that a prosecutor [13:08.280 --> 13:16.880] would actually call the code itself arcane, well, we need to understand this [13:16.880 --> 13:24.720] part about the grand juries, because the grand juries may well be the single tool [13:24.720 --> 13:32.440] that we can use, or it's the single most powerful tool that we can use, to change [13:32.440 --> 13:40.080] the legal landscape for our police and prosecutors, and bring them back in line [13:40.080 --> 13:45.000] and other public officials, bring them back in line with our law, so they won't [13:45.000 --> 13:52.400] look at our law and call it arcane, well, I received a letter, okay, let me explain [13:52.400 --> 13:59.920] what I did for those who haven't already heard it, I went to the Dallas County [13:59.920 --> 14:03.200] District Attorney with criminal complaints against some public officials, [14:03.200 --> 14:10.000] they had me removed from the office by three people with pistols on their hips, [14:10.000 --> 14:15.960] now I took that as being at constructed gunpoint, because I asked the [14:15.960 --> 14:21.880] investigators who were wearing these pistols, that if I didn't leave the [14:21.880 --> 14:25.720] building the way they told me to, are you guys prepared to pull them pistols, [14:25.720 --> 14:30.040] the first thing I asked from one of those pistols is loaded, and they assured [14:30.040 --> 14:34.480] me that they were, then I asked them if they was prepared to pull them, and they [14:34.480 --> 14:40.400] said they would if they had to, so I took that as a clear indication that if I [14:40.400 --> 14:45.920] didn't do exactly what they said, I run the risk of being shot, I took that as [14:45.920 --> 14:52.320] constructive gunpoint, so I left the building, then I went to the Tarrant [14:52.320 --> 15:00.280] County Grand Jury, when I went to Dallas County it was for the [15:00.280 --> 15:07.520] purpose of presenting complaints to a grand jury, and I was thwarted, so I went [15:07.520 --> 15:11.640] to Tarrant County with criminal complaints against the district [15:11.640 --> 15:16.520] attorney for denying me access to the grand jury at constructive gunpoint, and [15:16.520 --> 15:22.640] I call that first degree first assault, well I maintained to the Tarrant County [15:22.640 --> 15:30.840] Grand Jury that the district judge who impanels the grand jury is restricted to [15:30.840 --> 15:38.080] a venue, while he is a state judge he's restricted to a venue, and while there is [15:38.080 --> 15:45.600] a grand jury convened in every county in the state of Texas, there is nothing in [15:45.600 --> 15:54.040] the code that limits a grand jury to a county or to any other venue, they are [15:54.040 --> 15:59.240] state grand juries each and every one of them, and there's nothing in the code [15:59.240 --> 16:06.600] that limits their venue the way the code limits the venue of a district judge, we [16:06.600 --> 16:11.600] used to have circuit judges sit right all over the state and hear cases [16:11.600 --> 16:17.000] wherever they went, but we got so many people and we needed more judges to the [16:17.000 --> 16:21.920] point they didn't have to travel anymore, so that's why the legislature limited [16:21.920 --> 16:29.720] them to venue, but they never saw fit to do that to a grand jury, so my contention [16:29.720 --> 16:33.720] was that a grand jury had statewide jurisdiction, we're about to go to break [16:33.720 --> 16:38.760] when we come back I'll read you this letter I have from the foreman of the [16:38.760 --> 16:43.320] grand jury, I think you will find it interesting, this is Randy Kelton, [16:43.320 --> 16:49.640] Debra Stevens, rule of law radio, our call-in number is 512-646-1984, give us a call, [16:49.640 --> 16:55.440] we'll be taking your calls all night, we'll be right back. [16:59.760 --> 17:05.320] Through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [17:05.320 --> 17:09.680] of nutrition, people feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's [17:09.680 --> 17:14.600] time we changed all that, our primary defense against aging and disease in this [17:14.600 --> 17:19.440] toxic environment is good nutrition, in a world where natural foods have been [17:19.440 --> 17:24.720] irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients [17:24.720 --> 17:29.160] you need, Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of [17:29.160 --> 17:33.880] products, most of which we reject, we have come to trust Young Jevity so much [17:33.880 --> 17:39.200] we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many [17:39.200 --> 17:44.000] others, when you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com your health will [17:44.000 --> 17:49.240] improve as you help support quality radio, as you realize the benefits of [17:49.240 --> 17:54.000] Young Jevity you may want to join us, as a distributor you can experience [17:54.000 --> 17:59.360] improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income, order [17:59.360 --> 18:04.200] now. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or [18:04.200 --> 18:09.080] even losses? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method, [18:09.080 --> 18:13.040] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors [18:13.040 --> 18:17.080] and now you can win too, you'll get step-by-step instructions in plain [18:17.080 --> 18:21.600] English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, what to do [18:21.600 --> 18:26.200] when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone [18:26.200 --> 18:30.000] calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the [18:30.000 --> 18:34.880] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away, the Michael Mears [18:34.880 --> 18:39.320] proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors, personal [18:39.320 --> 18:43.080] consultation is available as well, for more information please visit [18:43.080 --> 18:47.560] RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email [18:47.560 --> 18:56.480] michaelmears.yahoo.com, that's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s [18:56.480 --> 19:22.880] at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now, you are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com [19:22.880 --> 19:46.200] okay we are back, Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, RuleOfLawRadio and I'm about to read a [19:46.200 --> 19:53.160] letter by the Foreman of the Grand Jury and I want you to listen to the letter [19:53.160 --> 20:03.000] and when I'm done figure out what is wrong with this picture, we Grand Jury A [20:03.000 --> 20:07.880] of Tarrant County Texas have received the documents you sent for consideration by [20:07.880 --> 20:12.400] this Grand Jury, as servants of the citizens of Tarrant County we give all [20:12.400 --> 20:18.320] correspondence and complaints sent to us our utmost attention the Texas Code of [20:18.320 --> 20:24.560] Criminal Procedure article 20.09 states that the Grand Jury shall inquire into [20:24.560 --> 20:33.080] all offenses liable to die of knowledge or of which they shall be informed by [20:33.080 --> 20:40.720] the attorney representing the state or any other credible person and that's the [20:40.720 --> 20:48.120] way I read it under consideration of your material for you provided we do not [20:48.120 --> 20:54.000] find a Tarrant County offense liable to indictment under the Texas law thank you [20:54.000 --> 21:06.280] for your correspondence what is wrong with that picture what part of the Grand [21:06.280 --> 21:15.880] Jury shall inquire into all offenses liable to indictment it does not say all [21:15.880 --> 21:26.000] offenses committed within the boundaries of Tarrant County it says all offenses [21:26.000 --> 21:31.760] and if the legislature had intended that the Grand Jury restrict its [21:31.760 --> 21:38.320] investigation to the county in which it was impaneled it absolutely would have [21:38.320 --> 21:47.120] said so under the rules of construction it would have been required to say so so [21:47.120 --> 21:55.800] what do we do now one of the points I keep trying to make to people trying to [21:55.800 --> 22:04.080] to buck the system trying to get the system to follow the rules is when we [22:04.080 --> 22:10.600] try something and the officials don't do what they're supposed to we tend to get [22:10.600 --> 22:15.400] frustrated and feel betrayed and mistreated and all that other nonsense [22:15.400 --> 22:24.360] well I read this from the perspective of how can I use this to kick him in his [22:24.360 --> 22:32.640] professional pants how can I make this situation worse for them because they [22:32.640 --> 22:45.120] didn't do it right so I look at 20.09 which in which binds the Grand Jury to [22:45.120 --> 22:51.440] a duty and they have an oath they swore to that they would protect the [22:51.440 --> 23:00.360] Constitution and faithfully carry out their duties and blah blah blah well [23:00.360 --> 23:10.640] shall the way I read it in law is not is obligatory does not mean may matter can [23:10.640 --> 23:20.280] if he wants to it means must so the way I read this the Tarrant County Grand [23:20.280 --> 23:28.080] Jury juror this is the only one I know anything about is the foreman because [23:28.080 --> 23:35.260] his signatures on here the foreman of the Grand Jury took it upon himself to [23:35.260 --> 23:41.880] fail to perform a duty he was required to perform and in the process denied me [23:41.880 --> 23:47.640] in the equal protection of the law and what they're going to say is is they [23:47.640 --> 23:52.240] have no duty to protect me the police tell you real fast they have no duty to [23:52.240 --> 24:00.800] protect you that's true they don't but they do have a duty to enforce law I [24:00.800 --> 24:07.680] don't need the police to protect me I have the law for that then I have the [24:07.680 --> 24:13.480] police and other public officials there to enforce the law and if they enforce [24:13.480 --> 24:21.880] the law the law is what protects me well in this case the way I read the code [24:21.880 --> 24:30.320] that Thomas Wilburn or Williams failed to perform a duty he was required to [24:30.320 --> 24:34.400] perform and in the process denied me in full free access to enjoyment right [24:34.400 --> 24:41.720] violation of 39.03 Texas Penal Code which is official persons class a [24:41.720 --> 24:49.920] misdemeanor I further a certain the ledge that Thomas our Williams committed [24:49.920 --> 24:54.640] this act for the purpose of shielding the accused from prosecution and [24:54.640 --> 25:05.720] violation of 38.05 Texas Penal Code 38.05 Texas Penal Code assesses a penalty one [25:05.720 --> 25:16.880] level less than the charge against the one that was shielded and I charged [25:16.880 --> 25:26.960] Craig Watkins as respondeat superior accusing him of sending people out with [25:26.960 --> 25:35.040] loaded pistols to commit first-degree felony aggravated assault against me in [25:35.040 --> 25:41.840] furtherance of a violation of 36.05 witness tampering 36.06 obstruction of [25:41.840 --> 25:52.720] justice so since 2202 b2a first aggravated assault by a public official [25:52.720 --> 25:58.640] acting under the color of an official authority is a first-degree felony then [25:58.640 --> 26:04.240] I charge Thomas our Williams with second-degree felony shielding from [26:04.240 --> 26:12.800] prosecution see how he likes that one and I'll file this with a second grand [26:12.800 --> 26:21.840] jury in Tarrant County so if you're a grand jury sitting on the grand jury [26:21.840 --> 26:34.040] and you get my complaint along with this letter this is very likely to get your [26:34.040 --> 26:41.560] attention big-time and it should get your attention the grand jury thinks [26:41.560 --> 26:48.920] they have immunity well they do have immunity from being sued well they [26:48.920 --> 27:00.320] have a certain immunity but so far as I can tell no immunity of any public [27:00.320 --> 27:08.640] official extends to immunity from the consequences of criminal behavior even [27:08.640 --> 27:14.760] the civil consequences of criminal behavior they essentially have the same [27:14.760 --> 27:23.120] immunity that a judge has and what the courts other judges want to say is that [27:23.120 --> 27:31.440] when a judge acts from the bench then he can't be sued and there's a very fine [27:31.440 --> 27:42.440] distinction that I want to make when the judge acts from the bench is he immune [27:42.440 --> 27:49.320] from prosecution if in the process in the process of acting from the bench he [27:49.320 --> 27:55.800] performs an act that's defined as a crime in the state of Texas example I [27:55.800 --> 28:04.320] filed a trespass to try to suit in a state court in Texas in a in an eviction [28:04.320 --> 28:12.960] issue a trespass to try title to challenge a substitute trustees deed the [28:12.960 --> 28:19.240] defendant immediately removed to the federal court and our favorite federal [28:19.240 --> 28:30.240] judge mr. I'm a big stinker McBride dismissed it with prejudice well the [28:30.240 --> 28:38.240] night 2011 venue and removal clarification act says that while a [28:38.240 --> 28:44.160] state case can be removed to the Fed if there are federal issues the state [28:44.160 --> 28:53.480] issues must be severed and remanded that the state can not hear I mean the Fed [28:53.480 --> 29:01.520] cannot hear state issues well he failed to remand because the only issue was a [29:01.520 --> 29:08.640] trespass to try title which is very specific to Texas and nowhere else so it [29:08.640 --> 29:14.080] is absolutely state only and it was designed for that purpose so it's my [29:14.080 --> 29:23.400] position that when he violated law and exercised an authority he did not have [29:23.400 --> 29:30.000] and dismissed the case he had no authority to dismiss well as a crime in [29:30.000 --> 29:34.840] the state of Texas and I want the bad boy indicted I'll be taking him to a [29:34.840 --> 29:39.880] grand jury as well but first I want to get the grand jury softened up and I'm [29:39.880 --> 29:44.680] going to soften them up by firing against the former the grand jury and [29:44.680 --> 29:49.840] see how this works out for call lines are open five one two six four six [29:49.840 --> 30:05.320] 1984 we'll be right back who wrote the federalist papers you need to know if [30:05.320 --> 30:09.480] you were an immigrant wanting to become an American under Catherine Albrecht and [30:09.480 --> 30:13.400] I'll be back with a peek at some of the questions on the u.s. citizenship test [30:13.400 --> 30:19.520] next privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never [30:19.520 --> 30:24.080] get it back again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will [30:24.080 --> 30:28.840] start to vanish too so protect your rights say no to surveillance and keep [30:28.840 --> 30:33.880] your information to yourself privacy it's worth hanging on to this public [30:33.880 --> 30:37.760] service announcement is brought to you by start page comm the private search [30:37.760 --> 30:45.240] engine alternative to Google Yahoo and Bing start over with start page pop quiz [30:45.240 --> 30:50.640] who is America's first postmaster general did you say uncle Sam actually [30:50.640 --> 30:54.920] it's Benjamin Franklin relax you were born here but if you weren't and you [30:54.920 --> 30:58.920] were applying for u.s. citizenship you could be in hot water you'd also have [30:58.920 --> 31:03.080] to brush up on 99 other possible questions an immigration officer might [31:03.080 --> 31:07.320] throw at you during the u.s. citizenship test stuff like name a branch of [31:07.320 --> 31:11.720] government or what year was the Constitution written or who's your state [31:11.720 --> 31:16.400] governor sometimes I wonder how well we do if everyone got tested but there's [31:16.400 --> 31:21.000] one question I know we'd all ace when is the last day to file your federal [31:21.000 --> 31:25.460] income tax forms uh-huh and dr. Katherine Albrecht more news and [31:25.460 --> 31:33.000] information at Katherine Albrecht calm this is building seven a 47-story [31:33.000 --> 31:37.040] skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11 the government says that [31:37.040 --> 31:41.560] fire brought it down however 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded [31:41.560 --> 31:45.280] it was a controlled demolition over 6,000 my fellow service members have [31:45.280 --> 31:49.120] given their lives thousands of my fellow first responders are dying I'm not a [31:49.120 --> 31:52.360] conspiracy theorist I'm a structural engineer in New York City correction [31:52.360 --> 31:55.880] officer I'm an Air Force pilot I'm a father who lost his son we're Americans [31:55.880 --> 32:01.400] and we deserve the truth go to remember building seven dot org today you feel [32:01.400 --> 32:05.420] tired when talking about important topics like money and politics are you [32:05.420 --> 32:09.560] confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve what if so you [32:09.560 --> 32:14.640] may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today stupidity hi my name [32:14.640 --> 32:18.880] is Steve Holt and like millions of other Americans I was diagnosed with stupidity [32:18.880 --> 32:23.160] at an early age I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found [32:23.160 --> 32:27.560] in almost every home in America the television unfortunately that puts most [32:27.560 --> 32:32.120] Americans at risk of catching stupidity but there is hope the staff at brave new [32:32.120 --> 32:35.520] books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports [32:35.520 --> 32:39.760] zombie ism recover and because of brave new books I now enjoy reading and [32:39.760 --> 32:44.120] watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested so [32:44.120 --> 32:48.440] if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity then you need to call five one [32:48.440 --> 32:54.120] two four eight zero two five zero three or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or brave [32:54.120 --> 32:57.240] new bookstore calm side effects when using brave new books products may [32:57.240 --> 32:59.920] include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in [32:59.920 --> 33:08.320] mental functioning live free speech radio logos radio network dot com [34:00.120 --> 34:06.920] okay we are back Randy Kelton Debra Stevens rule our radio and we're [34:06.920 --> 34:16.280] talking about how to get the grand jury to do its job at the moment they seem [34:16.280 --> 34:26.640] not to want to and we are working to encourage them to indict these scoundrel [34:26.640 --> 34:40.960] pub officials so to have the grand jury refusing to hear a complaint and that [34:40.960 --> 34:45.880] makes things very interesting because we're going to file against the grand [34:45.880 --> 34:57.480] jury and when we do that it'll be interesting to see how the the county [34:57.480 --> 35:03.480] reacts if it does react at all because when I file these complaints against [35:03.480 --> 35:09.560] the district attorney and the Dallas County District Attorney in Tarrant [35:09.560 --> 35:19.120] County the indication is is that the Tarrant County grand jury did [35:19.120 --> 35:29.200] absolutely nothing and in fact that's exactly what the law requires is that [35:29.200 --> 35:35.080] they do nothing since it's a complaint against a public official they're a [35:35.080 --> 35:41.640] butt out and it looks like that's exactly what they did so from my [35:41.640 --> 35:50.920] perspective that's really a good thing so now I will be really put a dime this [35:50.920 --> 35:56.720] has to really put them in a quandary where I'm only dealing with the grand [35:56.720 --> 36:05.640] jury and a jury grand jury has a prosecutor to give them legal advice but [36:05.640 --> 36:16.640] here they don't and even the district attorney because of the kind of research [36:16.640 --> 36:25.840] that I do he's kind of out of his league in this really focused area in trying to [36:25.840 --> 36:33.560] deal with me the grand jury on the other hand they're not legal professionals at [36:33.560 --> 36:40.800] all they're really out of their league so if you're the district attorney and I [36:40.800 --> 36:48.240] file against the foreman of one of your grand juries can you leave the foreman [36:48.240 --> 36:59.320] out to dry since the grand jury member is himself acting in the capacity of a [36:59.320 --> 37:06.600] public official what do you do this should be really interesting it should [37:06.600 --> 37:18.920] put them in a serious legal quandary now as I say often it is not my purpose here [37:18.920 --> 37:25.560] to get anybody indicted and I still get a lot of flack for saying that but it [37:25.560 --> 37:31.040] really isn't my purpose the purpose is to get these public officials to follow [37:31.040 --> 37:40.160] law and that's a tough road to hoe because even public officials acting in [37:40.160 --> 37:48.360] the best of faith they pretty well do as they've been trained to do and this [37:48.360 --> 37:52.120] includes grand jurors especially grand jurors because grand jurors don't know [37:52.120 --> 37:56.680] anything about how the system's supposed to work they don't know how it normally [37:56.680 --> 38:04.760] works and essentially they have to be able to trust the prosecutor and the [38:04.760 --> 38:11.240] judge who put him in these positions and instructed them as to how to act and now [38:11.240 --> 38:18.880] all of a sudden they find themselves hung out to dry prosecuting attorney [38:18.880 --> 38:25.080] since of their public officials he's been directed by the legislature to butt [38:25.080 --> 38:35.120] out so how does the grand jury get legal advice they could ask the district [38:35.120 --> 38:41.880] judge the district judge can give the grand jury legal advice and so far as I [38:41.880 --> 38:51.360] can tell there is no prohibition on a district judge when the grand jury asked [38:51.360 --> 38:57.760] for the judge's legal opinion so good they can go to a grant to a district [38:57.760 --> 39:03.280] judge and a district judge can give them legal advice problem that the district [39:03.280 --> 39:16.200] judge has when the district judge gives legal advice to the grand jury is he [39:16.200 --> 39:23.880] acting in a judicial capacity or he's is he acting in the capacity of law your [39:23.880 --> 39:30.720] client because when the district attorney gives the grand jury legal [39:30.720 --> 39:37.000] advice that's all your client we don't get any cause then next I'm going to go [39:37.000 --> 39:42.960] to information requests that I've filed with Tarrant County and we have [39:42.960 --> 39:53.120] assistant district attorneys responding to the requests as an agent for the [39:53.120 --> 39:58.560] judges the justices of the peace where I filed these requests well in that case [39:58.560 --> 40:06.360] while the attorney is an assistant district attorney they're not acting in [40:06.360 --> 40:15.640] a prosecutorial capacity and thereby have zero immunity when they're giving [40:15.640 --> 40:21.960] legal advice to public officials they're just a lawyer hired by the state so the [40:21.960 --> 40:28.680] question would become if the prosecuting attorney who's been directed by the [40:28.680 --> 40:39.240] legislature to give such advice is prevented by article 2.03 from having [40:39.240 --> 40:46.040] anything to do with this then if the district judge gives legal advice to the [40:46.040 --> 40:56.920] grand jury is he an attorney and can I then sue him or even move to prosecute [40:56.920 --> 41:07.560] him if he advises the grand jury to act in contravention to standing law because [41:07.560 --> 41:15.240] such advice would have to necessarily be construed not only as criminal [41:15.240 --> 41:27.160] conspiracy 1502 Texas Penal Code but also fomenting litigation which is in [41:27.160 --> 41:35.320] violation of the bar association standards and would be an act of [41:35.320 --> 41:41.320] malpractice so could I then sue the judge for malpractice when he gives [41:41.320 --> 41:46.840] legal advice to a grand jury my local prosecutor complained at me [41:46.840 --> 41:52.840] won't that I keep asking questions that nobody has ever asked before well maybe [41:52.840 --> 42:00.200] these need to be asked so this this will bring up a lot of interesting questions [42:00.200 --> 42:07.600] that that these folks haven't handled before that are extremely basic to a [42:07.600 --> 42:16.040] well-structured law and for the most part have no case law governing so this [42:16.040 --> 42:21.000] should get everybody hopping and I'm a little uncomfortable with this because [42:21.000 --> 42:30.480] it appears we really do have a good district attorney in turn can she's she [42:30.480 --> 42:34.800] found some documentations in her office when she took over that indicated that [42:34.800 --> 42:42.640] the prior prosecutors were concerned with 19 officers with the veracity of [42:42.640 --> 42:50.240] their testimony in various cases and she immediately to major investigation into [42:50.240 --> 42:55.600] these 19 officers she denied it she didn't slide it under the rug and she [42:55.600 --> 43:00.360] made the fact that it was their public which hadn't been done so before and she [43:00.360 --> 43:08.760] said she had a duty to the public to make this to bring this out so I was [43:08.760 --> 43:14.920] really surprised that was very political police are going to be really really [43:14.920 --> 43:19.560] unhappy about that but she's telling the police department don't come on the [43:19.560 --> 43:26.680] stand in my court in the court that I'm in and lie because I will not have your [43:26.680 --> 43:34.320] back and for her to do that I thought was a politically sensitive thing to do [43:34.320 --> 43:40.200] so apparently we have a judge of the district attorney will do the right [43:40.200 --> 43:44.600] thing for the right reason and I don't want to do anything to cause her too [43:44.600 --> 43:51.480] much difficulty hang on when we come back we'll talk about some open records [43:51.480 --> 43:56.960] requests that I have five Randy Kelton radio or calling number five one two six [43:56.960 --> 44:04.560] four six nineteen eighty four right hello my name is Stuart Smith from [44:04.560 --> 44:08.480] nature's pure organics calm and I would like to invite you to come by our store [44:08.480 --> 44:13.440] at 1904 Guadalupe Street sweet D here in Austin Texas I'm brave new books and [44:13.440 --> 44:16.560] change things to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your [44:16.560 --> 44:21.000] very own eyes have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure [44:21.000 --> 44:24.480] and alternative medicine take a peek at some of our other wonderful products [44:24.480 --> 44:29.160] including our Australian emu oil lotion candles olive oil soaps and colloidal [44:29.160 --> 44:34.920] silver and gold call five one two two six four four zero four three or find us [44:34.920 --> 44:39.760] online at nature's pure organics dot com that's five one two two six four four [44:39.760 --> 44:44.000] zero four three nature's pure organics dot com don't forget to like us on [44:44.000 --> 44:48.600] Facebook for information on events and our products nature's pure organics dot [44:48.600 --> 44:51.080] com [45:00.160 --> 45:05.360] are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an [45:05.360 --> 45:10.320] attorney with jurisdictionary the affordable easy to understand for CD [45:10.320 --> 45:15.640] course that will show you how in 24 hours step-by-step [45:15.640 --> 45:20.000] have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if you don't have a [45:20.000 --> 45:24.400] lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have won with our [45:24.400 --> 45:29.760] step-by-step course and now you can too jurisdictionary was created by a [45:29.760 --> 45:35.280] licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience even if you're not [45:35.280 --> 45:39.320] in the lawsuit you can learn what everyone should understand about the [45:39.320 --> 45:44.120] principles and practices that control our American courts you'll receive our [45:44.120 --> 45:51.200] audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases pro se tactics and [45:51.200 --> 45:57.240] much more please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll [45:57.240 --> 46:14.840] free 866-LAW-EASY [46:27.440 --> 46:36.680] okay we are back Randy Kelton Debra Stevens rule of law radio on this [46:36.680 --> 46:45.440] Thursday the 18th day of June 2015 and didn't mention we had some really good [46:45.440 --> 46:54.960] weather down here in Texas we had a nice moist May broke our drought filled our [46:54.960 --> 47:02.560] lakes and then a couple days ago we had a hurricane come charging up out of the [47:02.560 --> 47:09.760] Gulf and almost never does a hurricane reaches this far inland but this one [47:09.760 --> 47:16.320] reached reached us and I've been saying that you know we just got a little a [47:16.320 --> 47:25.560] little blow around here and I'm just as Texas what's a little rain but this one [47:25.560 --> 47:35.760] was more than a little oh this one was really rain we had about 12 hours of a [47:35.760 --> 47:43.200] steady downpour and just about two-thirds of North Texas is right now [47:43.200 --> 47:49.520] is struggling with flash floods and high water so it's been a really [47:49.520 --> 47:54.880] interesting spring we're in the middle of July and we haven't cracked a hundred [47:54.880 --> 48:02.200] yet we barely made 95 generally by the middle of May we'll get into the high [48:02.200 --> 48:09.680] 90s and by June we rock up into the hundreds well so much for global warming [48:09.680 --> 48:18.240] okay back to my next issue is what we're doing here now everything we're doing [48:18.240 --> 48:26.120] here is designed to soften these guys up is designed to take the things they're [48:26.120 --> 48:34.600] doing and turn it back on them and do it from the perspective of a ordinary [48:34.600 --> 48:42.960] citizen so these things are coming at them not from some investigative agency [48:42.960 --> 48:51.160] or some outside influence but just ordinary individuals and that's what [48:51.160 --> 48:58.200] makes it all the more powerful I went around to some JPs and handed out some [48:58.200 --> 49:07.120] in some information requests and I requested all of the emails of these [49:07.120 --> 49:16.640] judges that are on government computers and oh do I have them hopping up and [49:16.640 --> 49:24.960] down and I'm going to go through we have a apparently some of this information [49:24.960 --> 49:31.760] is going to be released because we've had a kind of a flurry of emails back [49:31.760 --> 49:37.040] and forth they liked to do their standard little song and dance and [49:37.040 --> 49:43.280] seltzer pan the first thing they did was they said that they didn't disagree that [49:43.280 --> 49:49.720] certain of the information I requested was open for public inspection but the [49:49.720 --> 49:55.200] only way I could see it is when they would have to print it out and that [49:55.200 --> 50:01.080] before they print it out I'd have to put down a deposit to pay for their time of [50:01.080 --> 50:09.880] printing it out and I followed with an email telling them that that was [50:09.880 --> 50:17.200] absolutely patently untrue that if they will go back and read my request that I [50:17.200 --> 50:25.760] did not request copies that I requested to to examine the information in the [50:25.760 --> 50:33.280] context and in the format in which it was stored I wasn't asking for database [50:33.280 --> 50:38.120] information that can be spread around a database I was asking for [50:38.120 --> 50:44.240] communications between human beings so these communications between human [50:44.240 --> 50:50.600] beings must necessarily be provided to these human beings in a form in which [50:50.600 --> 50:59.960] they can read it and if it's in a form that it can be read I want it in the [50:59.960 --> 51:05.880] form that it's in and that's in the code and they knew it because when I made [51:05.880 --> 51:11.920] that objection they dropped this whole thing about printing and next Tuesday I [51:11.920 --> 51:17.600] will go in and look at some of these emails but they did send a request to [51:17.600 --> 51:24.400] the to the Texas Attorney General for an for Attorney General's opinion the [51:24.400 --> 51:32.360] Attorney General is the one that renders opinions concerning open records issues [51:32.360 --> 51:40.640] and I say open records issue because we have a Texas government code open [51:40.640 --> 51:51.200] records act we also have a rule 12 of the rules of court which make certain [51:51.200 --> 51:56.520] records of the judiciary open for public inspection and we have the [51:56.520 --> 52:07.640] Constitution so I carefully craft my request so that it's not in the format [52:07.640 --> 52:18.880] of any specific code I just asked for to see records okay their response was [52:18.880 --> 52:23.000] that's Tarrant County County District Attorney's offices of public [52:23.000 --> 52:28.100] information received a public information request from request [52:28.100 --> 52:32.200] directed to Judge Wright Justice and Peace Precinct for seeking all emails [52:32.200 --> 52:37.840] sent and received from her County Microsoft account for a specific frame [52:37.840 --> 52:48.560] of time see copy as a request blah blah blah okay first section section 552 101 [52:48.560 --> 52:53.560] Texas government code exempts from disclosure information considered to be [52:53.560 --> 52:59.080] confidential by law either constitutional statutory or by judicial [52:59.080 --> 53:05.200] decision under 552 101 information may be may be withheld from public [53:05.200 --> 53:15.320] disclosure oops on the basis of common law privacy if the information sought [53:15.320 --> 53:20.440] is highly intimate or embarrassing such that its release would be highly [53:20.440 --> 53:25.280] objectionable to a person of ordinary sensibilities and there is no legitimate [53:25.280 --> 53:33.040] interest in disclosing such information quote industrial found versus Texas [53:33.040 --> 53:39.560] industrial accident board well when you read code you know what we talk about [53:39.560 --> 53:46.160] how to to write legal documents and one of the things we talk about is never [53:46.160 --> 53:51.800] make proactive statement of law out of your own mouth and another thing we [53:51.800 --> 54:03.600] tell you is read the code in my rebuttal I quote this section information may be [54:03.600 --> 54:12.200] withheld from public disclosure on the basis of common law privacy if the [54:12.200 --> 54:18.640] information sought may be highly intimate or embarrassing such that its [54:18.640 --> 54:24.920] release would be highly objectionable to a person of ordinary sensibilities and [54:24.920 --> 54:31.120] there is no legitimate public interest in disclosing the information well [54:31.120 --> 54:35.840] assertion does not follow from industrial foundation in fact such a [54:35.840 --> 54:42.920] consideration is exclusively excluded by industrial foundation as follows the [54:42.920 --> 54:48.560] sole criteria for determining whether information is exempt from disclosure [54:48.560 --> 54:55.960] as confidential by judicial decision or whether the information is a legitimate [54:55.960 --> 55:01.080] public concern and whether its public publication would be highly objectionable [55:01.080 --> 55:08.200] to a reasonable person reasonable person if the legislature intended that other [55:08.200 --> 55:12.360] criteria be considered in deciding whether information is open for [55:12.360 --> 55:19.040] inspection if it desires to change the wording of the statute it will it will [55:19.040 --> 55:23.160] have an early opportunity to do so at the convening of the next legislative [55:23.160 --> 55:29.840] session and I apologize I thought I had the actual statute in here the statute [55:29.840 --> 55:39.600] was one short sentence that specifically stipulated this in this information that [55:39.600 --> 55:46.280] you could not make this kind of consideration that you can only make a [55:46.280 --> 55:53.320] consideration based on specific statutory exclusions let's see what time [55:53.320 --> 55:58.640] I got okay when I come back for break I'll look at the actual statute up on [55:58.640 --> 56:09.120] the break it is unclear to what judge Wright is referencing from page 551 of [56:09.120 --> 56:15.720] the case saw the industrial fund on reading the case it appears that the [56:15.720 --> 56:20.040] court came to a radically different decision than the one suggested by [56:20.040 --> 56:29.200] Judge Wright finally and finally the section 1 and section 14 of the Open [56:29.200 --> 56:34.080] Records Act command that the provisions of the act be liberally construed to [56:34.080 --> 56:38.440] favor disclosure of public records I'm reading the decision of the court here [56:38.440 --> 56:43.640] let me see how much time I got I've got my clock type covered up by my page so [56:43.640 --> 56:49.920] I'm having to make sure I can see what time I got okay the practical effects [56:49.920 --> 56:54.920] of a statutory directive for liberal construction of an act is that close [56:54.920 --> 57:01.760] judgment calls are to be resolved in favor of the stated purpose of the [57:01.760 --> 57:06.920] legislation in the present appeal this court is not required to make a close [57:06.920 --> 57:11.920] call nevertheless a liberal construction of the Open Records Act seems to [57:11.920 --> 57:16.400] compel disclosure of information even when disclosure might cause [57:16.400 --> 57:22.800] inconvenience or embarrassment for some persons it is of some importance in this [57:22.800 --> 57:27.520] connection to observe that both the majority of dissenting justices in [57:27.520 --> 57:32.640] industrial foundation recognized in the Open Records Act a strong legislative [57:32.640 --> 57:38.960] preference for disclosure over confidentiality over confidentiality as [57:38.960 --> 57:43.520] discussed I mean this is a quote from industrial as discussed appellants [57:43.520 --> 57:48.000] believe disclosure in the present case would cause embarrassment some of the [57:48.000 --> 57:53.840] applicants and disclosure and discourage some qualified persons from applying for [57:53.840 --> 58:00.400] a similar position this is where they were required to release the names of [58:00.400 --> 58:05.240] people considered for a particular position assuming that this to be true [58:05.240 --> 58:10.480] the harm from the disclosure certainly no more substantial than the [58:10.480 --> 58:14.760] potential harm of disclosure of alleged judicial foundation where respondents [58:14.760 --> 58:19.400] assert that very real possibility that release of names and workers [58:19.400 --> 58:25.400] compensation complaint claimants might result in retaliatory discharge or job [58:25.400 --> 58:30.800] discrimination I'm gonna go around a little time on this and I'm doing this [58:30.800 --> 58:36.000] to kind of give you an idea of how we rebut these things I'll pick this up on [58:36.000 --> 58:40.120] the other side Randy Kelton Debra Stevens rule our radio or call it number [58:40.120 --> 58:46.040] five one two six four six nineteen eighty-four we'll be right back [58:49.440 --> 58:55.240] the Bible remains the most popular book in the world yet countless readers are [58:55.240 --> 58:59.840] frustrated because they struggle to understand it some new translations try [58:59.840 --> 59:04.840] to help by simplifying the text but in the process can compromise the profound [59:04.840 --> 59:10.120] meaning of the scripture enter the recovery version first this new [59:10.120 --> 59:15.040] translation is extremely faithful and accurate but the real story is the more [59:15.040 --> 59:20.320] than 9,000 explanatory footnotes difficult and profound passages are [59:20.320 --> 59:24.960] opened up in a marvelous way providing an entrance into the riches of the word [59:24.960 --> 59:29.840] beyond which you've ever experienced before Bibles for America would like to [59:29.840 --> 59:34.560] give you a free recovery version simply for the asking this comprehensive yet [59:34.560 --> 59:40.040] compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at one eight eight [59:40.040 --> 59:46.760] eight five five one zero one zero two or by ordering online at free study Bible [59:46.760 --> 59:54.960] dot-com that's free study Bible dot-com you're listening to the logos radio [59:54.960 --> 01:00:02.200] network and logos radio network dot-com the following you splashes brought to [01:00:02.200 --> 01:00:07.360] you by the Lone Star Lowdown providing the deli bulletins for the commodities [01:00:07.360 --> 01:00:14.600] market today in history news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the [01:00:14.600 --> 01:00:24.080] alternative markets for the 17th of June opened up with gold at one thousand [01:00:24.080 --> 01:00:27.960] one hundred seventy six dollars and 41 cents an ounce silver 16 dollars and one [01:00:27.960 --> 01:00:31.280] cent an ounce Texas crude fifty nine dollars and ninety seven cents a barrel [01:00:31.280 --> 01:00:41.360] and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 250 US currency today in history [01:00:41.360 --> 01:00:46.880] Wednesday June 17th 1789 the National Constituent Assembly or National [01:00:46.880 --> 01:00:51.440] Assembly as it was more popularly known was formed members had been meeting and [01:00:51.440 --> 01:00:54.840] planning this new assembly since the 13th of that same month and year it was [01:00:54.840 --> 01:00:57.960] the Revolutionary Assembly formed by the representatives of the third estate [01:00:57.960 --> 01:01:07.760] during the French Revolution in recent news over 200 pages related to Pope [01:01:07.760 --> 01:01:11.600] Francis's encyclical on climate change were leaked earlier this week the [01:01:11.600 --> 01:01:15.120] Vatican has asked that reporters and news outlets refrain from revealing or [01:01:15.120 --> 01:01:18.440] commenting on the details until the documents are officially released [01:01:18.440 --> 01:01:25.960] tomorrow the European Union reached a preliminary agreement today to extend [01:01:25.960 --> 01:01:29.240] economic sanctions which would have expired at the end next month until [01:01:29.240 --> 01:01:33.040] January of next year against Russia in response to their role in the Ukraine [01:01:33.040 --> 01:01:37.080] conflict the Baltic states were seeking tougher sanctions but still conceded to [01:01:37.080 --> 01:01:41.120] the extension of existing ones which restrict access to capital by Russian [01:01:41.120 --> 01:01:44.840] banks and companies including asset freezing and travel restrictions on [01:01:44.840 --> 01:01:48.160] selected individuals and companies the sanctions are expected to be adopted [01:01:48.160 --> 01:01:52.200] formally next week in March European Union leaders agree that the sanctions [01:01:52.200 --> 01:01:56.560] would not be lifted until the Minsk accords are met not everyone is on board [01:01:56.560 --> 01:02:01.160] though Greece's Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras before her April trip to Moscow [01:02:01.160 --> 01:02:04.840] condemned the sanctions and called for an end to antagonistic relations with [01:02:04.840 --> 01:02:08.500] Russia Russian diplomats aren't happy either obviously as they have been [01:02:08.500 --> 01:02:13.800] seeking to influence the vote on the continuation of these actions [01:02:16.400 --> 01:02:20.280] uber after completely getting up and leaving San Antonio earlier this year [01:02:20.280 --> 01:02:23.760] for what it called the most burdensome regulations in the nation is ready to [01:02:23.760 --> 01:02:28.080] open up new dialogue with local leaders about the potential return uber rep Debbie [01:02:28.080 --> 01:02:31.040] Hancock said that the people of San Antonio made their voices loud and [01:02:31.040 --> 01:02:35.320] clear that they want uber mayor Taylor has a unique opportunity to take a major [01:02:35.320 --> 01:02:38.560] step towards accomplishing this and we look forward to working with her at [01:02:38.560 --> 01:02:42.120] least one other city council member Alan Warwick has spoken out with similar [01:02:42.120 --> 01:02:45.560] sentiments he said that I think the information that we have now is a lot [01:02:45.560 --> 01:02:48.880] more robust we have a number of additional cities and states that have [01:02:48.880 --> 01:02:51.840] made decisions on uber and lift we have a lot more information to bring to the [01:02:51.840 --> 01:03:01.160] table this has been your lowdown for June 17 2015 [01:03:21.840 --> 01:03:48.800] yeah we're back Randy Kelton students we were right here and I have been a bad [01:03:48.800 --> 01:03:59.720] boy it seems that somebody forgot to turn the phones on but since I'm a guy [01:03:59.720 --> 01:04:05.480] and guys never take responsibility I gotta blame somebody else I just hadn't [01:04:05.480 --> 01:04:11.000] figured out who that'll be yet I apologize for that it just I forgot to [01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:15.120] turn them on my bad I'm wondering why I'm not getting any calls frankly I [01:04:15.120 --> 01:04:17.640] started out today with a really bad headache thought this is gonna be a [01:04:17.640 --> 01:04:21.200] long show if I don't get any calls and then I didn't turn the phone lines on [01:04:21.200 --> 01:04:27.040] but I got it into something let me we have max from Texas but I'd like to [01:04:27.040 --> 01:04:33.960] finish a little discussion and part of it is this is a brief from the Tarrant [01:04:33.960 --> 01:04:41.160] County District Attorney's Office and their problem was is they responded to [01:04:41.160 --> 01:04:49.600] my request on the 15th day they got 15 days to produce the the documents or [01:04:49.600 --> 01:04:54.720] put in a request to the Attorney General they responded on the fifth to me on the [01:04:54.720 --> 01:05:03.160] 15th day and I gave them a rather blistering response and remind the [01:05:03.160 --> 01:05:12.880] lawyer that when she is giving advice here she's not operative I her district [01:05:12.880 --> 01:05:19.920] attorney official immunity here she's this is a client attorney client is [01:05:19.920 --> 01:05:28.840] situation where she has no immunity of any kind and so the next day they give [01:05:28.840 --> 01:05:33.760] this brief so the point is they didn't have much time oh wonderful wonderful [01:05:33.760 --> 01:05:41.320] okay I'll only do this one part the rescued of it was nonsensical judge [01:05:41.320 --> 01:05:47.040] write a search as follows information may be may be held from the public from [01:05:47.040 --> 01:05:51.800] public basic of common law privacy if the information sought is highly [01:05:51.800 --> 01:05:55.680] intermittent or embarrassing such that the release would be highly objectionable [01:05:55.680 --> 01:06:01.280] to a person of ordinary sensibilities there is no legitimate public interest [01:06:01.280 --> 01:06:07.240] in disclosing information this is what she claimed but she did it not cite a [01:06:07.240 --> 01:06:14.320] case supporting this statement now she cited a case later but she didn't cite [01:06:14.320 --> 01:06:19.560] that case of supporting this statement and in fact when you read the case the [01:06:19.560 --> 01:06:24.960] case did not support this statement but here's the statute she's referring to [01:06:24.960 --> 01:06:33.480] five fifty two point one oh one information is accepted from the [01:06:33.480 --> 01:06:38.480] requirement of section five fifty two oh two one and that's one that requires [01:06:38.480 --> 01:06:44.760] it be disclosed if it is information considered to be confidential by law [01:06:44.760 --> 01:06:53.280] either constitutional statutory or by judicial decision that's what can be [01:06:53.280 --> 01:07:03.800] withheld doesn't say anything about embarrassing so my argument here was [01:07:03.800 --> 01:07:11.440] under the screws doctrine you have the duty to know the screws doctrine says [01:07:11.440 --> 01:07:16.960] that if a public official violates a ruling of this court here let me read it [01:07:16.960 --> 01:07:22.200] from the code from this statute he who defies a decision interpreting the [01:07:22.200 --> 01:07:29.320] Constitution knows precisely what he's doing if saying he hardly may be her say [01:07:29.320 --> 01:07:37.000] he knows not what he did okay this is a public official acting under an official [01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:44.200] authority for the purpose of enforcing law now it's not unreasonable that this [01:07:44.200 --> 01:07:50.960] official would have full knowledge of the laws affecting her position it's not [01:07:50.960 --> 01:07:58.160] like me working in my own business or working for another company not knowing [01:07:58.160 --> 01:08:02.800] the codes and statutes now if I work for a company they're going to expect me to [01:08:02.800 --> 01:08:07.400] know their policies and procedures they're not going to be understanding if [01:08:07.400 --> 01:08:14.760] I don't here we got except got to presume that the judge knows that the [01:08:14.760 --> 01:08:21.640] information that she puts on a public computer is public so now she would come [01:08:21.640 --> 01:08:27.040] back and complain that oh my goodness this I put highly sensitive and [01:08:27.040 --> 01:08:31.320] embarrassing information on a computer and now I don't want to release it [01:08:31.320 --> 01:08:38.060] forget that noise and then the other argument they had and was that they [01:08:38.060 --> 01:08:48.520] argued that communications between judges concerning policy was should be [01:08:48.520 --> 01:08:55.480] exempted because then the judges could not discuss these policies freely you [01:08:55.480 --> 01:09:03.080] kidding me these judges don't work together each one of those judges are a [01:09:03.080 --> 01:09:11.600] separate our separate elected officials what do they do have been discussing the [01:09:11.600 --> 01:09:18.080] private business of their particular precinct with another judge and under [01:09:18.080 --> 01:09:23.440] what circumstances should that be exempted from disclosure as a matter of [01:09:23.440 --> 01:09:30.600] fact it is my position and is my consideration that this is exactly what [01:09:30.600 --> 01:09:36.840] has gone on that we have reason to believe that these judges have used [01:09:36.840 --> 01:09:46.800] these public emails to discuss how they would breach standing law at the expense [01:09:46.800 --> 01:09:52.080] of pro se litigants and now the judges come back and say oh well if our bad [01:09:52.080 --> 01:09:56.920] behavior became public it would be embarrassing well it should become [01:09:56.920 --> 01:10:02.760] embarrassing so anyway that's I'm going to stop here I'm hoping that this gets [01:10:02.760 --> 01:10:13.800] us a good opinion from the Attorney General considering what happened to [01:10:13.800 --> 01:10:20.080] Hillary Clinton will over her emails this should you know even here Hillary [01:10:20.080 --> 01:10:29.080] Clinton she had a struggle you because she used her private email to do public [01:10:29.080 --> 01:10:37.040] business and all the pub this stuff on the public websites were absolutely [01:10:37.040 --> 01:10:43.480] either private by law or open to the public there's no question and now here [01:10:43.480 --> 01:10:50.200] this one the difference is that this is not a private email this is a public [01:10:50.200 --> 01:10:54.480] email so unless it's statutorily exempted they're going to have to [01:10:54.480 --> 01:10:58.760] release it so we may get all the judges emails I don't really care about their [01:10:58.760 --> 01:11:06.560] emails but if they if they have been using those emails to conspire against [01:11:06.560 --> 01:11:11.680] us this will get very interesting okay we're going to go to max in Texas hello [01:11:11.680 --> 01:11:21.200] max hello mr. Randy come sorry about the phone issue my bad [01:11:21.200 --> 01:11:32.040] no are you able to hear me talking from the bottom of a toilet bowl yeah kind [01:11:32.040 --> 01:11:36.720] of but I turned my head set up so I could hear you better okay well you're [01:11:36.720 --> 01:11:44.000] just keep your face just keep your face out of the water just recently got into [01:11:44.000 --> 01:11:52.280] a financing agreement with a with an auto dealership and and you know it's [01:11:52.280 --> 01:11:58.920] been about a week since I've had the car and and the paperwork had been finalized [01:11:58.920 --> 01:12:06.320] and signed at least by me and and then I got a call saying that the finance [01:12:06.320 --> 01:12:13.920] company has has reconsidered and they require me to pay a larger down payment [01:12:13.920 --> 01:12:19.320] now I have you know all the paperwork in my hand and I noticed that in a big [01:12:19.320 --> 01:12:26.760] black box that is titled federal truth and lending disclosures it has the total [01:12:26.760 --> 01:12:31.520] sale price and it has you know the amount of my down payment on there you [01:12:31.520 --> 01:12:38.480] know as the amount that I paid and you know not including this extraneous [01:12:38.480 --> 01:12:43.440] amount that they're trying to collect now and I'm just wondering if I thought [01:12:43.440 --> 01:12:49.280] that you know a contract between me and say a finance company but you know would [01:12:49.280 --> 01:12:55.920] be you know it would be binding as soon as binding and setting stone you know [01:12:55.920 --> 01:12:59.280] the covenants would be binding and setting stone as soon as it's signed and [01:12:59.280 --> 01:13:08.960] consummated affirmed hold on okay hold on hold on a contract does not [01:13:08.960 --> 01:13:16.240] necessarily become binding when it is signed it becomes binding when [01:13:16.240 --> 01:13:25.120] something of value changes hands did now you referenced a car did you buy a car [01:13:25.120 --> 01:13:31.240] and did you trade in a car at the same time changed in my direction does it not [01:13:31.240 --> 01:13:38.440] seem like a transfer of you know of valuables you know wait okay did you [01:13:38.440 --> 01:13:43.760] purchase a car yes sir well I financed a car I got into [01:13:43.760 --> 01:13:48.760] financing and put down a down payment left with the automobile okay oh okay [01:13:48.760 --> 01:13:56.400] you put down a down payment I know the paperwork good the deal is done the [01:13:56.400 --> 01:14:03.520] down payment is it's something of value changes changed hands that consummated [01:14:03.520 --> 01:14:10.160] the contract whether it was signed or not but when something of value changes [01:14:10.160 --> 01:14:17.120] hands consequent to an agreement between two persons a contract is created so [01:14:17.120 --> 01:14:23.440] here you had it signed and something of value changed hands you had a binding [01:14:23.440 --> 01:14:30.080] contract correct so I kind of you know when the guy the business manager of [01:14:30.080 --> 01:14:35.240] said dealership when he called me and stated that the finance company would [01:14:35.240 --> 01:14:40.600] now like you to put more down apparently he didn't put down enough I kind of you [01:14:40.600 --> 01:14:43.800] know told them well aren't I in the position to work and tell them to go [01:14:43.800 --> 01:14:48.480] pound-sand because we've already got a signed contract and the signed [01:14:48.480 --> 01:14:54.040] agreement and you know I mean that it is what it is now I mean they had their [01:14:54.040 --> 01:14:59.760] stab at denying me or requesting a higher down payment you know before the [01:14:59.760 --> 01:15:06.600] before the contract you know was affirmed if I'm not mistaken okay once [01:15:06.600 --> 01:15:12.240] once you gave them the down payment and they accepted it the contract was bound [01:15:12.240 --> 01:15:20.880] they can pound-sand actually it may be worse than that and this this should be [01:15:20.880 --> 01:15:26.880] illegal this sounds like it goes to bait and switch they baited you with a low [01:15:26.880 --> 01:15:30.600] down payment and then switch to a higher down payment and the rules that they're [01:15:30.600 --> 01:15:35.440] required to follow as a car dealership and this does sound like a bait and [01:15:35.440 --> 01:15:46.000] switch yes okay what is your intended outcome here well honestly Randy I'll be [01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:52.440] honest with you I was happy with the original agreement as signed and and and [01:15:52.440 --> 01:15:56.320] and I'm happy with telling them to go pound-sand when it comes to the [01:15:56.320 --> 01:16:01.440] revisions after the fact okay let me that's why the reason I ask you the [01:16:01.440 --> 01:16:13.760] question is because there's a number of irresponsible you know so you don't want [01:16:13.760 --> 01:16:29.600] to be unreasonable and just beat them up for the fun of it my suggestion is okay [01:16:29.600 --> 01:16:35.760] hang on my suggestion is is that we go to break and take this over actually I [01:16:35.760 --> 01:16:40.000] know exactly what you should do and it won't be what you expect this is Randy [01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:45.440] Kelton Denver Stevens rule of our radio our call-in number five one two six four [01:16:45.440 --> 01:16:50.680] six nineteen eighty four I've actually got the phones off on now taking your [01:16:50.680 --> 01:17:03.280] calls all night we'll be right back my name is Jessica Armand I'm an activist a [01:17:03.280 --> 01:17:07.000] GCN listener and mother of three our drinking water and food are filled with [01:17:07.000 --> 01:17:10.600] fluoride and other contaminants that harm our teeth and gums to protect my [01:17:10.600 --> 01:17:14.280] family I created my magic mud an all-natural teeth whitening and [01:17:14.280 --> 01:17:18.040] strengthening remedy my magic mud is a soft powder that polishes your teeth [01:17:18.040 --> 01:17:22.200] reduces sensitivity and removes harmful toxins from deep inside your mouth you [01:17:22.200 --> 01:17:26.440] deserve a bright healthy smile visit my magic mud calm and get yours today [01:17:26.440 --> 01:17:32.080] that's my magic mud calm I've been using magic mud for a while now and I [01:17:32.080 --> 01:17:35.800] just can't believe how much healthier my teeth and gums feel I love the product [01:17:35.800 --> 01:17:39.840] this is Anna Martin the libertarian homeschooler I homeschool so I drink [01:17:39.840 --> 01:17:44.520] coffee and I drink coffee so I use magic mud gets my teeth really clean give it a [01:17:44.520 --> 01:17:48.400] try this is John Bush of the Liberty Beat my wife and I use my magic mud [01:17:48.400 --> 01:17:51.440] because it brightens our smile and our daughter uses it because it makes [01:17:51.440 --> 01:17:56.440] brushing fun to get your can of my magic mud go to brave new books or order it [01:17:56.440 --> 01:18:03.640] online at my magic mud calm at Capital Coin and Boolean our mission is to be [01:18:03.640 --> 01:18:06.880] your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service [01:18:06.880 --> 01:18:10.720] and outstanding value at an affordable price we provide a wide assortment of [01:18:10.720 --> 01:18:13.960] favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and [01:18:13.960 --> 01:18:17.520] precious metals we cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large [01:18:17.520 --> 01:18:21.040] transactions for investors and we believe in educating our customers with [01:18:21.040 --> 01:18:25.200] resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists if we don't have [01:18:25.200 --> 01:18:29.160] what you're looking for we can find it in addition we carry popular [01:18:29.160 --> 01:18:33.160] longevity products such as beyond tangy tangerine and pollen burps we also [01:18:33.160 --> 01:18:37.040] offer one world way mountain house storable foods burkey water products [01:18:37.040 --> 01:18:41.440] ammunition at 10% above wholesale and more we broke her metals IRA accounts [01:18:41.440 --> 01:18:45.800] and we also accept bitcoins as payment call us at five one two six four six six [01:18:45.800 --> 01:18:50.080] four four zero we're located at seventy three oh four Burnett Road suite a about [01:18:50.080 --> 01:18:54.120] a half mile south of Anderson we're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6 Saturdays [01:18:54.120 --> 01:18:58.360] 10 to 2 visit us at capital coin and Boolean calm or call five one two six [01:18:58.360 --> 01:19:01.760] four six six four four oh [01:19:01.760 --> 01:19:27.240] is the logo's a little ghost radio net [01:19:27.240 --> 01:19:39.280] And we're talking to Max in Texas, my suggestion Max, in order to get the car dealer side [01:19:39.280 --> 01:19:48.040] that you paid them exactly the amount of down payment you needed to, is go to the Better [01:19:48.040 --> 01:19:57.160] Business Bureau and put this scathing complaint on the Better Business Bureau site. [01:19:57.160 --> 01:20:09.080] And then take a copy of that and send a complaint to the dealership with Mr. Campbell saying [01:20:09.080 --> 01:20:19.160] that you're unhappy with your treatment and here's the crux of my problem as filed with [01:20:19.160 --> 01:20:22.200] the Better Business Bureau. [01:20:22.200 --> 01:20:29.960] And then ask them to please cease and desist all efforts to collect a higher down payment. [01:20:29.960 --> 01:20:32.400] Send it to them. [01:20:32.400 --> 01:20:38.840] And I bet they'd get that problem fixed really, really fast. [01:20:38.840 --> 01:20:45.240] My wife bought a $5,000 couch and it was horrible. [01:20:45.240 --> 01:20:49.840] And she told them come back and get it and they were going to charge her a 40% restocking [01:20:49.840 --> 01:20:52.280] fee. [01:20:52.280 --> 01:20:58.640] And I sent them a tort letter with the body of the tort letter, my complaint to the Better [01:20:58.640 --> 01:21:04.400] Business Bureau and not only did they decide we wouldn't have to pay that 40% restocking [01:21:04.400 --> 01:21:11.480] charge, they were out within three days to pick it up. [01:21:11.480 --> 01:21:12.480] So what do you think? [01:21:12.480 --> 01:21:20.720] Because sending a complaint following the protocols of the BBB is one thing, but do [01:21:20.720 --> 01:21:26.960] I need to even take this to the level of crafting a tort letter? [01:21:26.960 --> 01:21:33.720] No, I don't do yet because they haven't harmed you. [01:21:33.720 --> 01:21:34.720] True. [01:21:34.720 --> 01:21:43.160] Them asking for more money didn't do you a cognizable, adjudicatable harm. [01:21:43.160 --> 01:21:49.800] You know, they sold us this garbage couch and we paid them $5,000 for it and couldn't [01:21:49.800 --> 01:21:51.040] sit on it. [01:21:51.040 --> 01:21:56.080] So that was harm, but yours isn't to the point of harm yet, unless... [01:21:56.080 --> 01:21:57.080] Go ahead. [01:21:57.080 --> 01:22:04.680] I did not increase the down payment and they were to take some action to repossess or to [01:22:04.680 --> 01:22:11.920] nullify the contract as it stands, that would then be a harm kind of thing. [01:22:11.920 --> 01:22:12.920] Exactly. [01:22:12.920 --> 01:22:13.920] Okay. [01:22:13.920 --> 01:22:16.880] And that has not happened as of yet. [01:22:16.880 --> 01:22:22.720] And I think the business owner, when I explained to him that, you know, I don't understand [01:22:22.720 --> 01:22:29.560] why you already have a standing contract and at which point does the contract become firm [01:22:29.560 --> 01:22:33.760] if you're able to change it after the fact that it's already signed? [01:22:33.760 --> 01:22:40.080] And he did admit to me verbally that, yes, indeed, you could tell me to go pound stand. [01:22:40.080 --> 01:22:48.720] So like I said, I'm happy with the transaction and good faith as it occurred originally, [01:22:48.720 --> 01:22:57.480] but the agendas and the changing for solely the benefit of the lender is not going to [01:22:57.480 --> 01:23:00.640] be acceptable for me. [01:23:00.640 --> 01:23:05.920] The term is unconscionable. [01:23:05.920 --> 01:23:12.760] When a provision benefits one side and not the other, then it's unconscionable. [01:23:12.760 --> 01:23:16.640] So you want me to pay a bigger down payment, then you're going to... [01:23:16.640 --> 01:23:21.000] Brother, I just have some simple questions, hopefully they were straight to the point. [01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:22.000] You're going to... [01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:23.000] I'll let you jump on the car. [01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:27.000] Unless you don't have one, I'll keep yakking with you, brother. [01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:28.600] Yeah, exactly. [01:23:28.600 --> 01:23:30.040] You want a bigger down payment? [01:23:30.040 --> 01:23:31.760] Take a point off my intruders. [01:23:31.760 --> 01:23:33.760] It is not unconscionable. [01:23:33.760 --> 01:23:39.920] It sounds like I was just going to come pay more and keep all the paperwork that I have [01:23:39.920 --> 01:23:40.920] as it stands. [01:23:40.920 --> 01:23:46.200] And I explained to him that, no, we're going to have to completely redo all the paperwork [01:23:46.200 --> 01:23:51.160] because now the financed amount will change and the down payment will change. [01:23:51.160 --> 01:23:56.240] I mean, so this stuff needs to be reflected so that it doesn't... [01:23:56.240 --> 01:24:01.840] You're amortization, eventually I'm not paying interest on something that you're asking me [01:24:01.840 --> 01:24:03.840] to pay in front. [01:24:03.840 --> 01:24:09.400] See, the technical term for that is homey don't play that. [01:24:09.400 --> 01:24:10.400] Exactly. [01:24:10.400 --> 01:24:12.840] And homey don't play that. [01:24:12.840 --> 01:24:13.840] So... [01:24:13.840 --> 01:24:18.840] I suspect with what you've told me, you've already got it. [01:24:18.840 --> 01:24:23.480] And that is an interesting point that it would change everything. [01:24:23.480 --> 01:24:27.400] And I wonder, are they doing this to people on a regular basis? [01:24:27.400 --> 01:24:32.760] Wait a minute, you might back up and who owns this... [01:24:32.760 --> 01:24:33.760] Wait a minute. [01:24:33.760 --> 01:24:34.760] Who owns this dealership? [01:24:34.760 --> 01:24:39.000] Well, I'll send it to you in an email, but I don't think that it might be... [01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:45.600] Well, what I'm going to suggest is you can find who owns the dealership and sit down [01:24:45.600 --> 01:24:50.880] with him and say, look, I wrote this contract. [01:24:50.880 --> 01:24:56.160] And we determined the principle and interest and the amount of payments. [01:24:56.160 --> 01:25:01.760] And then somebody came back to me and wanted to increase the down payment. [01:25:01.760 --> 01:25:04.520] Is this a common practice? [01:25:04.520 --> 01:25:08.040] Would you actually rewrite this whole contract? [01:25:08.040 --> 01:25:14.040] Or do you have somebody in your company squeezing extra money out of people that you don't know [01:25:14.040 --> 01:25:15.040] about? [01:25:15.040 --> 01:25:24.040] Well, that's the thing, the business manager of the dealership stated that it was the finance [01:25:24.040 --> 01:25:31.760] company that came to him and told him that he must revise the agreement. [01:25:31.760 --> 01:25:38.520] And I'm curious because I thought that the contract that I was signing was between the [01:25:38.520 --> 01:25:45.800] dealership and I and they were to handle the financing and therefore they are a party to [01:25:45.800 --> 01:25:49.640] their side of it and not my side of it. [01:25:49.640 --> 01:25:52.040] That doesn't sound right. [01:25:52.040 --> 01:25:59.840] That sounds like somebody within the company is pulling a fast one. [01:25:59.840 --> 01:26:04.320] They may be getting you to put that down payment down and then they stick that in their pocket. [01:26:04.320 --> 01:26:05.320] And that's what I thought. [01:26:05.320 --> 01:26:08.080] It was someone pulling a fast one. [01:26:08.080 --> 01:26:14.720] And that's why I began to look through this ridiculous stack of paper that they've given [01:26:14.720 --> 01:26:17.720] me full of legalese. [01:26:17.720 --> 01:26:25.800] But once I noticed that it was referring out to TILA and UCC, I was like, well, jeez, I [01:26:25.800 --> 01:26:30.000] listen to really well radio and those are not unfamiliar concepts for me. [01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:33.760] So I have no problem going there and exactly figuring it out. [01:26:33.760 --> 01:26:41.200] And I think when I mentioned TILA, I told them, well, it's no problem, you know, I'll [01:26:41.200 --> 01:26:46.640] call the financing company and I'll explain to them that maybe they should review it again. [01:26:46.640 --> 01:26:54.360] And I think once I mentioned TILA, the demeanor of the conversation changed a bit. [01:26:54.360 --> 01:26:59.840] Are you there, Randy? [01:26:59.840 --> 01:27:00.840] You may have hit me. [01:27:00.840 --> 01:27:03.360] It could be Grimland's. [01:27:03.360 --> 01:27:05.040] They muted my mic again. [01:27:05.040 --> 01:27:12.320] I own my own business and people who work for me when they screw up, they never ever [01:27:12.320 --> 01:27:14.400] tell me. [01:27:14.400 --> 01:27:20.280] And what I found, the bigger the business, the harder it is for the guys who actually [01:27:20.280 --> 01:27:25.520] reach in their pocket and risk their money to start and run this business. [01:27:25.520 --> 01:27:29.960] They never get the good information. [01:27:29.960 --> 01:27:34.800] You might actually owe it to the owner of this company to run this by him. [01:27:34.800 --> 01:27:39.960] If he's actually doing this, he's not going to like getting caught at it, but it's more [01:27:39.960 --> 01:27:41.720] likely that he is not. [01:27:41.720 --> 01:27:50.440] A very good chance that he's got people down below him doing things to his client that [01:27:50.440 --> 01:27:54.480] he is not going to be happy with. [01:27:54.480 --> 01:27:56.280] He has a right to know. [01:27:56.280 --> 01:28:01.640] Yeah, and I was looking into in the administrative code where they talk about, I mean, these [01:28:01.640 --> 01:28:10.200] people have to have a license to be a retailer of new and used cars or a franchisee or whatever. [01:28:10.200 --> 01:28:20.000] And apparently, the answer to the Texas Department of Motor Vehicle, what is it, the board they're [01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:21.000] calling it. [01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:29.120] So, I mean, these guys need to realize that they have rules to follow too, and I was initially [01:28:29.120 --> 01:28:30.120] happy with the deal. [01:28:30.120 --> 01:28:38.760] I, in good faith, signed the paperwork, and I thought that if things are going to change [01:28:38.760 --> 01:28:49.240] and the contract be in any way construed to be unconscionable, then I'm not going to let [01:28:49.240 --> 01:28:53.560] people get away with that. [01:28:53.560 --> 01:28:54.560] This is good. [01:28:54.560 --> 01:29:00.440] You may wind up saving a lot of people from being ripped off because even if this is coming [01:29:00.440 --> 01:29:05.280] from higher up and you come in and put your finger on it, they're likely to cut that stuff [01:29:05.280 --> 01:29:06.280] out. [01:29:06.280 --> 01:29:07.280] Yeah. [01:29:07.280 --> 01:29:08.280] You're probably right. [01:29:08.280 --> 01:29:13.280] And besides, it's so much fun to do that. [01:29:13.280 --> 01:29:22.840] What are you telling me to do, Jeff in Mississippi, Jeff Sedgwick up there in Maryland, Maryland? [01:29:22.840 --> 01:29:23.840] Jeff Sedgwick? [01:29:23.840 --> 01:29:24.840] Come on. [01:29:24.840 --> 01:29:25.840] I know you guys are listening. [01:29:25.840 --> 01:29:26.840] Call in. [01:29:26.840 --> 01:29:27.840] Okay. [01:29:27.840 --> 01:29:28.840] Yeah. [01:29:28.840 --> 01:29:32.200] Good chance Jeff is listening. [01:29:32.200 --> 01:29:33.200] Okay. [01:29:33.200 --> 01:29:34.200] We are about to go to break. [01:29:34.200 --> 01:29:36.200] We've got another caller. [01:29:36.200 --> 01:29:40.440] Max, make sure you keep us up to speed on how this works out. [01:29:40.440 --> 01:29:46.720] I'd like to get an idea of the look on the boss's face when you land on him like a ton [01:29:46.720 --> 01:29:47.720] of bricks. [01:29:47.720 --> 01:29:48.720] Okay. [01:29:48.720 --> 01:29:54.760] Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rue La Radio, or call in number 512-646-1984. [01:29:54.760 --> 01:30:01.160] We'll be right back. [01:30:01.160 --> 01:30:05.680] Drug smugglers have tried everything from submarines to catapults to get illegal drugs [01:30:05.680 --> 01:30:10.560] into the U.S., but their most recent method was so ingenious it only cost them a quarter [01:30:10.560 --> 01:30:11.560] of shipment. [01:30:11.560 --> 01:30:16.080] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back to tell you what it was. [01:30:16.080 --> 01:30:17.680] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:17.680 --> 01:30:21.280] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:21.280 --> 01:30:26.040] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:26.040 --> 01:30:31.200] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:31.200 --> 01:30:33.800] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:33.800 --> 01:30:38.100] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [01:30:38.100 --> 01:30:41.640] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:41.640 --> 01:30:44.840] Start over with Startpage. [01:30:44.840 --> 01:30:49.360] Mexican drug smugglers are always brainstorming new ways to outsmart the Border Patrol, but [01:30:49.360 --> 01:30:52.240] their recent exploits were the stuff of legend. [01:30:52.240 --> 01:30:58.160] The traffickers tunneled their way underground to 16-metered parking spaces in Nogales, Arizona, [01:30:58.160 --> 01:31:00.640] and cut careful rectangles in the pavement. [01:31:00.640 --> 01:31:06.000] U.S. accomplices then parked false-bottom cars above the holes, fed the parking meter, [01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:08.200] and stuffed the cars with drugs from below. [01:31:08.200 --> 01:31:13.040] Once the pavement plugs were back in place, the vehicles would cruise quietly away with [01:31:13.040 --> 01:31:14.520] nobody the wiser. [01:31:14.520 --> 01:31:19.160] Eventually, diligent deputies detained the digging desperados, and that was the end of [01:31:19.160 --> 01:31:20.160] drive-through drugs. [01:31:20.160 --> 01:31:22.360] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:31:22.360 --> 01:31:30.800] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:30.800 --> 01:31:31.800] I lost my son. [01:31:31.800 --> 01:31:32.800] My nephew. [01:31:32.800 --> 01:31:33.800] My uncle. [01:31:33.800 --> 01:31:34.800] My son. [01:31:34.800 --> 01:31:35.800] On September 11th, 2001. [01:31:35.800 --> 01:31:39.080] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th. [01:31:39.080 --> 01:31:43.200] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. [01:31:43.200 --> 01:31:49.040] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects [01:31:49.040 --> 01:31:52.840] and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story. [01:31:52.840 --> 01:31:54.280] Bring justice to my son. [01:31:54.280 --> 01:31:55.280] My uncle. [01:31:55.280 --> 01:31:56.280] My nephew. [01:31:56.280 --> 01:31:57.280] My son. [01:31:57.280 --> 01:31:58.280] Go to buildingwatch.org. [01:31:58.280 --> 01:32:01.160] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [01:32:01.160 --> 01:32:03.600] Nutritious food is real body armor. [01:32:03.600 --> 01:32:09.240] It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it [01:32:09.240 --> 01:32:10.240] needs. [01:32:10.240 --> 01:32:11.240] Did you know the U.S. [01:32:11.240 --> 01:32:14.920] government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States and classified it as [01:32:14.920 --> 01:32:18.480] a Schedule I drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant? [01:32:18.480 --> 01:32:22.560] People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don't know [01:32:22.560 --> 01:32:23.560] what hemp is. [01:32:23.560 --> 01:32:28.080] So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp. [01:32:28.080 --> 01:32:31.040] They are different varieties of the same species. [01:32:31.040 --> 01:32:35.760] HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand [01:32:35.760 --> 01:32:40.200] that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about. [01:32:40.200 --> 01:32:46.400] Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, [01:32:46.400 --> 01:32:49.160] and non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients. [01:32:49.160 --> 01:32:57.960] Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, [01:32:57.960 --> 01:33:00.960] only at hempUSA.org. [01:33:00.960 --> 01:33:07.280] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:07.280 --> 01:33:34.920] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and Max, if you're still [01:33:34.920 --> 01:33:35.920] listening. [01:33:35.920 --> 01:33:44.160] While we were talking, Jeff said he was sending me a Skype that I didn't see, so he sent it [01:33:44.160 --> 01:33:47.240] half a dozen times, and I still didn't see it. [01:33:47.240 --> 01:33:54.360] This is what he said, on the car deal, send a copy of the complaint or make a complaint [01:33:54.360 --> 01:34:00.680] with the CFPB, Consumer Financial Protecting Bureau. [01:34:00.680 --> 01:34:05.280] So call in tomorrow night, if you don't know what that is, maybe we can talk about it a [01:34:05.280 --> 01:34:07.160] little more tomorrow night. [01:34:07.160 --> 01:34:09.320] We'll have more time. [01:34:09.320 --> 01:34:10.640] Maybe I'll get Jeff to call in. [01:34:10.640 --> 01:34:15.320] Okay, now we're going to Mark in Florida. [01:34:15.320 --> 01:34:16.320] Hello, Mark. [01:34:16.320 --> 01:34:18.320] How are you doing, Randy? [01:34:18.320 --> 01:34:19.320] Doing good. [01:34:19.320 --> 01:34:31.120] By the way, your mic was kind of weak and breaking up and a little garbled at times. [01:34:31.120 --> 01:34:38.320] Well, we've got a lot of rain out here, and all the electronics are a little bit soggy [01:34:38.320 --> 01:34:39.320] at the moment. [01:34:39.320 --> 01:34:40.320] Okay. [01:34:40.320 --> 01:34:49.240] Well, you're a technician from the past, if I remember right, fix it. [01:34:49.240 --> 01:34:55.920] Well, what it may be, as a matter of fact, since you mentioned that, I was using solid [01:34:55.920 --> 01:35:06.720] copper, and solid copper for a phone line in or a network line, it generates 80 currents [01:35:06.720 --> 01:35:09.200] and they're less effective. [01:35:09.200 --> 01:35:17.040] You want twisted pairs, and these twisted pairs, they use little filaments that are [01:35:17.040 --> 01:35:20.960] then wrapped around the inside the line. [01:35:20.960 --> 01:35:29.400] A solid copper line builds a field up around it, and that field, as it increases and collapses, [01:35:29.400 --> 01:35:34.240] induces a field back into the wire. [01:35:34.240 --> 01:35:39.400] The movement of the field causes resistance in the wire. [01:35:39.400 --> 01:35:46.000] That's why Tulsa didn't win the contract to electrify America. [01:35:46.000 --> 01:35:53.840] He got it initially, but DC passing through a copper line got so much power loss that [01:35:53.840 --> 01:35:54.840] they had to go to AC. [01:35:54.840 --> 01:36:03.080] Well, it's a similar concept with the lines, and I changed the line to a twisted pair, [01:36:03.080 --> 01:36:08.480] but a good portion of it's outside, so I may have some moisture in the line that could [01:36:08.480 --> 01:36:11.040] be causing this problem. [01:36:11.040 --> 01:36:12.040] Good point. [01:36:12.040 --> 01:36:13.040] I'll have a look at it. [01:36:13.040 --> 01:36:21.280] All right, my problem is I've got a couple of misdemeanor charges in county court, and [01:36:21.280 --> 01:36:28.080] I got a female judge, and she's a real crafty dog, as you guys all well know. [01:36:28.080 --> 01:36:40.560] Now, I've filed a motion to depose witnesses, and she's telling me that she has no idea [01:36:40.560 --> 01:36:49.840] the process for a pro se to do that, whether the county... I'm also indigent, so she doesn't [01:36:49.840 --> 01:36:57.920] know whether the courthouse will give me a room to do this, give me somebody to square [01:36:57.920 --> 01:37:00.920] them in. [01:37:00.920 --> 01:37:09.240] You can go to the local library, and they'll give you a room to do this, and then you can [01:37:09.240 --> 01:37:18.200] bring your own court reporter, and you can bring a notary to square them in, and actually [01:37:18.200 --> 01:37:25.280] they won't need a notary if they just swear in on the record. [01:37:25.280 --> 01:37:32.920] If she doesn't know how to do this, then you might tell her, judge, if you don't know how [01:37:32.920 --> 01:37:39.720] to do your job, will you go get somebody who does? [01:37:39.720 --> 01:37:43.360] Like I said, she's a real crafty dog. [01:37:43.360 --> 01:37:51.200] She's crafty enough that she initially on this one case talked me into taking a public defender, [01:37:51.200 --> 01:37:56.640] which is something I would never do, and I have since gotten rid of her. [01:37:56.640 --> 01:38:07.360] She was actually going to... I got a phone call from a secretary and a doctor's secretary [01:38:07.360 --> 01:38:14.840] to set my appointment that my public defender had called about, and I got the voicemail, [01:38:14.840 --> 01:38:23.200] and it finally hit me after, I listened to it a couple times, it's got to be a shrink. [01:38:23.200 --> 01:38:30.120] So they were setting you up for a psychological condition, if they all were crazy enough to [01:38:30.120 --> 01:38:31.840] try to fight them? [01:38:31.840 --> 01:38:39.640] Well, I made a comment, I read her and her supervisor, the Riot Act, informed them that [01:38:39.640 --> 01:38:44.240] I was not the average dummy that walks in that courtroom, and I'm not going to put up [01:38:44.240 --> 01:38:52.760] these shenanigans that you normally pull throwing people under the bus, and informed [01:38:52.760 --> 01:39:00.880] them I was not afraid to file bar agreements or a malpractice suit against them. [01:39:00.880 --> 01:39:06.800] Next thing I know, I get this phone call from a shrink, they're going to try to prove me [01:39:06.800 --> 01:39:15.360] incompetent to stand trial, and by doing so, I would also be incompetent to file any complaints [01:39:15.360 --> 01:39:16.360] against them. [01:39:16.360 --> 01:39:21.240] Wait a minute, so it's say that again? [01:39:21.240 --> 01:39:23.840] What did the shrink say? [01:39:23.840 --> 01:39:27.440] Well, I never went. [01:39:27.440 --> 01:39:33.840] I never went, I just got the voicemail from the secretary, but I believe... [01:39:33.840 --> 01:39:39.120] What did the voicemail, okay, hold on, you said they, oh, you were saying, you were thinking [01:39:39.120 --> 01:39:44.640] they're trying to get you, they didn't, did they threaten you with finding you incompetent? [01:39:44.640 --> 01:39:55.240] No, no, but that, this is just my, well, my defender said it was to find me incompetent [01:39:55.240 --> 01:40:00.320] to stand trial, and my assumption from him is... [01:40:00.320 --> 01:40:06.200] You're probably right, but like I was talking about earlier, all this stuff they do wrong [01:40:06.200 --> 01:40:08.400] could be so much fun. [01:40:08.400 --> 01:40:17.880] You say, oh, wow, you want me to have a competency hearing, PsycheVal, well, I want a Daubert's [01:40:17.880 --> 01:40:18.880] hearing. [01:40:18.880 --> 01:40:23.760] Are you familiar with a Daubert's hearing? [01:40:23.760 --> 01:40:24.760] What is that? [01:40:24.760 --> 01:40:35.040] It's so much fun, a Daubert's hearing is a hearing to test the credentials of a professional [01:40:35.040 --> 01:40:45.520] witness or an expert witness, and the psychiatrist is going to get real excited if you ask for [01:40:45.520 --> 01:40:52.000] a Daubert's hearing, because they're psychiatrists. [01:40:52.000 --> 01:41:02.520] What Texas, what the Texas Court of Appeals called voodoo medicine, all this stuff's kind [01:41:02.520 --> 01:41:11.680] of made up, what is the kind of thing you can't really stipulate or specify? [01:41:11.680 --> 01:41:20.520] It's generally subjective in its nature, and that is effective to the courts, and if you [01:41:20.520 --> 01:41:27.480] have, if he holds a Daubert's hearing and he loses, he's history. [01:41:27.480 --> 01:41:33.160] So he is not going to, the psychiatrist is not, or psychologist is not going to want [01:41:33.160 --> 01:41:36.320] to have to subject himself to a Daubert's hearing. [01:41:36.320 --> 01:41:39.640] How do you spell that? [01:41:39.640 --> 01:41:43.600] D-A-U-B-E-R-T-S. [01:41:43.600 --> 01:41:51.320] That was the guy's name who this case, the case was established under. [01:41:51.320 --> 01:41:54.320] D-A-U-G-H? [01:41:54.320 --> 01:42:07.440] D-A-U, let's see, Delta Alpha Uniform, Bravo Uniform, Romeo Tango, Sierra. [01:42:07.440 --> 01:42:11.960] I'm surprised I still remember that. [01:42:11.960 --> 01:42:12.960] I still remember it. [01:42:12.960 --> 01:42:14.600] I'm a former avionics check. [01:42:14.600 --> 01:42:16.760] Yeah, I was a pilot. [01:42:16.760 --> 01:42:22.880] I wasn't a pilot in the military, but I was a pilot. [01:42:22.880 --> 01:42:23.880] Okay. [01:42:23.880 --> 01:42:34.600] The problem, the problem with, you know, like I said, I am an indigent, and the free room [01:42:34.600 --> 01:42:42.160] in the library would be great, but the court reporters are going to cost me money, right? [01:42:42.160 --> 01:42:45.680] Actually you can do this by the videotape. [01:42:45.680 --> 01:42:47.280] Really? [01:42:47.280 --> 01:42:54.160] Yeah, and if you just get a videotape, and they might, they'll probably want to have [01:42:54.160 --> 01:42:59.080] a lawyer there, that'll be okay, but you do have to have a name on video. [01:42:59.080 --> 01:43:04.240] You ask them to swear, and you don't have to be a court official for that. [01:43:04.240 --> 01:43:11.720] They're on tape, so this is on the record, and on the record, so they'd be just as bound. [01:43:11.720 --> 01:43:19.120] If they don't like it, let them raise an objection, and if they want a notary to notarize their [01:43:19.120 --> 01:43:24.640] witness, their swearing, well just bring yourself one. [01:43:24.640 --> 01:43:31.040] So I'll accept it on tape, and this is fairly well established. [01:43:31.040 --> 01:43:33.840] Most of the time, lawyers don't bring it. [01:43:33.840 --> 01:43:38.440] If there is a lawyer, if they bring their own lawyer, have their lawyers swear on me, [01:43:38.440 --> 01:43:43.000] you'll refuse, and you get to have all kinds of fun just jerking them around. [01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:45.000] Hang on, we're about to go to break. [01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:51.520] Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, rule of our radio, our call in number 512646, 1984, we'll [01:43:51.520 --> 01:44:00.440] be right back. [01:44:00.440 --> 01:44:03.920] You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics? [01:44:03.920 --> 01:44:04.920] Boring! [01:44:04.920 --> 01:44:07.840] Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve? [01:44:07.840 --> 01:44:08.840] What? [01:44:08.840 --> 01:44:12.520] If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity. [01:44:12.520 --> 01:44:18.160] Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity [01:44:18.160 --> 01:44:19.400] at an early age. [01:44:19.400 --> 01:44:23.360] I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home [01:44:23.360 --> 01:44:25.360] in America, the television. [01:44:25.360 --> 01:44:30.480] Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope. [01:44:30.480 --> 01:44:34.260] The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other poxaholics suffering [01:44:34.260 --> 01:44:36.560] from sports-zombie-ism recover. [01:44:36.560 --> 01:44:40.800] And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries [01:44:40.800 --> 01:44:42.880] without feeling tired or uninterested. [01:44:42.880 --> 01:44:50.840] So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 [01:44:50.840 --> 01:44:54.880] or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com. [01:44:54.880 --> 01:44:58.280] Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary [01:44:58.280 --> 01:45:00.120] and an overall increase in mental functioning. [01:45:00.120 --> 01:45:04.640] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.640 --> 01:45:11.400] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course [01:45:11.400 --> 01:45:14.400] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:14.400 --> 01:45:19.040] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.040 --> 01:45:23.880] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.880 --> 01:45:28.280] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.280 --> 01:45:34.200] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.200 --> 01:45:39.480] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about [01:45:39.480 --> 01:45:43.400] the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.400 --> 01:45:50.040] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:50.040 --> 01:45:52.400] pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.400 --> 01:46:05.280] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:05.280 --> 01:46:23.680] Hello, oh man, you're in jail, you're dirty man, oh man, I'm broke, man. [01:46:23.680 --> 01:46:40.160] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, ruleoflawradio, and we're talking to Mark [01:46:40.160 --> 01:46:41.600] in Florida. [01:46:41.600 --> 01:46:44.360] Mark, you have two misdemeanors. [01:46:44.360 --> 01:46:48.160] Are they serious enough to cost you jail time? [01:46:48.160 --> 01:46:52.240] Yes, maximum one year each. [01:46:52.240 --> 01:46:57.200] Okay, then we need to be real careful. [01:46:57.200 --> 01:47:04.360] The way I beat, I had one of those when a DPS officer knocked my tooth out and they [01:47:04.360 --> 01:47:08.080] filed against me to cover up what he did. [01:47:08.080 --> 01:47:15.400] And I used my lawyer to beat that one, my court-appointed lawyer. [01:47:15.400 --> 01:47:21.240] So a lawyer may help you. [01:47:21.240 --> 01:47:23.760] You might ask them to reappoint lawyers. [01:47:23.760 --> 01:47:26.560] You have to understand how this works. [01:47:26.560 --> 01:47:30.260] It's like a four-sided chessboard. [01:47:30.260 --> 01:47:36.600] You go into court, to your right is your lawyer, to the left is opposing counsel, and across [01:47:36.600 --> 01:47:39.440] from you is the judge. [01:47:39.440 --> 01:47:42.480] Opposing litigate doesn't matter. [01:47:42.480 --> 01:47:49.200] So your lawyer has a relationship with the judge and the opposing counsel. [01:47:49.200 --> 01:47:53.720] Opposing counsel has a relationship with the judge and your lawyer. [01:47:53.720 --> 01:47:56.880] The judge has a relationship with both of them. [01:47:56.880 --> 01:48:02.800] Only your lawyer has, you only have a relationship with your lawyer. [01:48:02.800 --> 01:48:07.000] This is all about relationships. [01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:16.480] You are at a clear disadvantage unless you can use these three's relationships to your [01:48:16.480 --> 01:48:25.520] advantage and the way you do that is first, you clobber your lawyer big time and then [01:48:25.520 --> 01:48:32.840] when your lawyer tries to withdraw, you object to him withdrawing. [01:48:32.840 --> 01:48:38.800] With mine, the judge appointed and I didn't ask for a lawyer. [01:48:38.800 --> 01:48:42.960] They called me into this hearing and I went up and I said, your honor, I have this summons [01:48:42.960 --> 01:48:46.880] to be here in court, but it doesn't tell me why, you won't tell me what I'm doing here? [01:48:46.880 --> 01:48:50.160] Well, mister, you need to see if you have an attorney. [01:48:50.160 --> 01:48:52.440] I said, well, that's interesting, your honor. [01:48:52.440 --> 01:48:57.800] I have 28.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and it lists all those things you can order [01:48:57.800 --> 01:48:59.840] me to come to court for. [01:48:59.840 --> 01:49:03.120] See if I have a lawyer who's not one of them. [01:49:03.120 --> 01:49:09.400] And that started us out on a good footing, but since she was the previous district attorney's [01:49:09.400 --> 01:49:15.080] daughter, 25, your district attorney's daughter, I figured she had a lot of political clout [01:49:15.080 --> 01:49:20.160] so I backed off from her and she said, well, mister Kelton, do you have an attorney? [01:49:20.160 --> 01:49:22.200] No, your honor, I do not. [01:49:22.200 --> 01:49:24.160] Are you going to hire an attorney? [01:49:24.160 --> 01:49:25.160] Nope. [01:49:25.160 --> 01:49:27.120] Would you like me to appoint one for you? [01:49:27.120 --> 01:49:28.120] I don't care what you do. [01:49:28.120 --> 01:49:30.920] Well, mister Kelton, I'm going to appoint you counsel. [01:49:30.920 --> 01:49:36.680] I said, well, if you do, your honor, make sure you appoint one you really don't like. [01:49:36.680 --> 01:49:41.040] And she just kind of laughed and said, well, we got a lawyer wheel here, you just get the [01:49:41.040 --> 01:49:43.000] next one off the wheel. [01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:47.620] He takes me in this room and he starts telling me, this is how things are going to go. [01:49:47.620 --> 01:49:52.040] And I said, stop, stop, stop, stop, no, no, no, no, that's not how things are going to [01:49:52.040 --> 01:49:53.040] go. [01:49:53.040 --> 01:49:54.040] Oh, it's not. [01:49:54.040 --> 01:49:55.040] Well, how are things going to go? [01:49:55.040 --> 01:49:59.560] I said, well, I have some motions before the court and it ain't about nothing, I'll say [01:49:59.560 --> 01:50:06.960] issues you will adequately adjudicate every single one of them. [01:50:06.960 --> 01:50:07.960] I'm sorry. [01:50:07.960 --> 01:50:08.960] I'm a little ahead of myself. [01:50:08.960 --> 01:50:12.000] I told him when I said that's not how it's going to go, he said, well, how are things [01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:13.000] going to go? [01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:15.880] And I told him, well, you're going to go to the judge and ask the judge to remove you [01:50:15.880 --> 01:50:18.200] from this case. [01:50:18.200 --> 01:50:22.520] And I'm going to go to the judge and tell her, don't you dare remove him from this case. [01:50:22.520 --> 01:50:26.040] He's my counsel of choice and he's under contract. [01:50:26.040 --> 01:50:29.720] And he said, well, Mr. Kelton, I'm not under contract with you, I'm under contract with [01:50:29.720 --> 01:50:35.240] the state as you are, but I'm the intended third party beneficiary and I have standing [01:50:35.240 --> 01:50:36.240] before the contract. [01:50:36.240 --> 01:50:41.880] He said, and then I said, and then the judge will remove you and she said, Jesse, what? [01:50:41.880 --> 01:50:48.240] Then I get to sue the judge for interfering with the contract. [01:50:48.240 --> 01:50:52.080] And the look on his face was priceless. [01:50:52.080 --> 01:50:57.720] It was a, you're going to get me disbarred look. [01:50:57.720 --> 01:51:02.120] That evening I called him and told him, I hadn't told you everything today and it kind [01:51:02.120 --> 01:51:06.160] of felt like I ought to tell you to rest. [01:51:06.160 --> 01:51:09.680] And it said that you might want to listen to my show and I'll explain my strategy. [01:51:09.680 --> 01:51:12.120] Well, Mr. Kelton, I don't have time, why don't you just tell me? [01:51:12.120 --> 01:51:16.120] I said, well, I have a motion before the court and it's got 19 due process violations in [01:51:16.120 --> 01:51:17.120] it. [01:51:17.120 --> 01:51:19.720] You will adequately adjudicate every single one of those. [01:51:19.720 --> 01:51:22.400] You failed to adequately adjudicate a single one. [01:51:22.400 --> 01:51:23.400] And I'll bar grieve you. [01:51:23.400 --> 01:51:30.680] If you really want to do a battery interruption, you give somebody about three seconds to recover. [01:51:30.680 --> 01:51:41.480] I counted one, two, three, four, five, Mr. Kelton, you would grieve me and a heartbeat. [01:51:41.480 --> 01:51:44.800] It says, well, it's come, I don't like to be threatened. [01:51:44.800 --> 01:51:49.200] So, well, I wasn't intending to threaten you, I was trying to get your heads up. [01:51:49.200 --> 01:51:53.080] If you don't want any more, that's okay, we'll just take it as it comes. [01:51:53.080 --> 01:51:54.080] Thank you. [01:51:54.080 --> 01:51:55.080] Goodbye. [01:51:55.080 --> 01:51:56.080] And I hung up on him. [01:51:56.080 --> 01:52:00.400] Eight o'clock the next morning, he called me apologizing all over the place. [01:52:00.400 --> 01:52:07.280] I bet he told me 20 times if he told me once, you can't beat this board. [01:52:07.280 --> 01:52:13.760] They threw out my case to protect my lawyer from me. [01:52:13.760 --> 01:52:20.400] But lawyer went to the judge and the prosecutor and said, I got this wacko guy as a client [01:52:20.400 --> 01:52:27.080] and he's going to ruin my career, you got to help me out. [01:52:27.080 --> 01:52:32.360] If you have your liberty at risk, this gets a lot more serious. [01:52:32.360 --> 01:52:41.440] So I suggest you give them reason to want to make your case go away. [01:52:41.440 --> 01:52:46.320] And the best way to do that is to make your court case go away by protecting your lawyer [01:52:46.320 --> 01:52:47.320] from you. [01:52:47.320 --> 01:52:57.880] Well, I had a calendar called Monday, which we've had several of these, but the state [01:52:57.880 --> 01:53:06.160] offered adjudication withheld and pay court costs on both charges. [01:53:06.160 --> 01:53:08.480] And I just smiled and said, no, thank you. [01:53:08.480 --> 01:53:11.640] I want to do the depositions. [01:53:11.640 --> 01:53:17.400] And that's when the judge started him hauling around, you know, she didn't know how this [01:53:17.400 --> 01:53:18.400] could be done. [01:53:18.400 --> 01:53:19.400] You know, process. [01:53:19.400 --> 01:53:23.640] Oh, wait, hold on, hold on. [01:53:23.640 --> 01:53:27.440] I am guilty of a presupposition. [01:53:27.440 --> 01:53:34.200] I was presupposing this was a municipal judge or an inferior court judge. [01:53:34.200 --> 01:53:41.680] But if this can get a year in prison, this has to be an elected county judge. [01:53:41.680 --> 01:53:55.520] You need to, you need to move to disqualify this judge for judicial incompetence. [01:53:55.520 --> 01:54:00.120] That would be a good- She lied to you. [01:54:00.120 --> 01:54:10.120] Oh, many times, every time I've been- File a motion to disqualify for judicial incompetence. [01:54:10.120 --> 01:54:21.720] Assume in your motion that she didn't know she was lying, that she's just incompetent. [01:54:21.720 --> 01:54:32.240] Okay, should I- Oh, that'd be- Go ahead, I interrupted you. [01:54:32.240 --> 01:54:35.720] Should I ask her to recuse herself first? [01:54:35.720 --> 01:54:36.720] No. [01:54:36.720 --> 01:54:43.760] I guess you could ask her to recuse herself for judicial incompetence. [01:54:43.760 --> 01:54:49.080] But judicial incompetence is a disqualification. [01:54:49.080 --> 01:54:52.160] She can always recuse herself. [01:54:52.160 --> 01:54:58.520] So you can tell her, you know, your honor, I don't know, I'd like Bushwhack better. [01:54:58.520 --> 01:55:02.960] I don't even want to talk to him about the issue. [01:55:02.960 --> 01:55:11.920] I know it's intuitive that human beings want to trash out their issues one with the other. [01:55:11.920 --> 01:55:15.760] And that's okay in normal on the street stuff. [01:55:15.760 --> 01:55:17.240] But this is court. [01:55:17.240 --> 01:55:19.480] Whack is much better. [01:55:19.480 --> 01:55:26.680] If you file a motion to disqualify for judicial incompetence, that's going to embarrass the [01:55:26.680 --> 01:55:29.080] crap out of her. [01:55:29.080 --> 01:55:34.120] And if she says one word about it, then you ask the bailiff to arrest her for tampering [01:55:34.120 --> 01:55:35.120] witness. [01:55:35.120 --> 01:55:46.840] She don't want you hurting her career and saying these bad things about her. [01:55:46.840 --> 01:55:51.520] But once you start the process, she can't say a word. [01:55:51.520 --> 01:55:55.520] You know, I've asked the bailiff to arrest judges a number of times. [01:55:55.520 --> 01:56:02.080] The judge always sat there and kept his mouth shut because he knew one word, tampering [01:56:02.080 --> 01:56:07.180] with a witness, obstruction of justice gets real serious real fast. [01:56:07.180 --> 01:56:14.360] So once you take the shot at the judge, they're not used to that. [01:56:14.360 --> 01:56:15.360] Lawyers can do that. [01:56:15.360 --> 01:56:17.800] I mean, I'm sorry, lawyers can't do that. [01:56:17.800 --> 01:56:23.520] Lawyer does that, that judge has snatched their bar card or the next judge will snatch [01:56:23.520 --> 01:56:29.080] his bar card, but you're not there dangling by your bar card. [01:56:29.080 --> 01:56:36.160] So you become a professional threat to the judge when you become the pro se from hell. [01:56:36.160 --> 01:56:41.000] You want to give them reason to want you to go away. [01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:47.000] And from what I've heard you say so far, you've already done that. [01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:52.040] They want you to go away. [01:56:52.040 --> 01:56:58.320] The reason she decided I needed a public defender was because I brought up the motion, you know, [01:56:58.320 --> 01:57:05.120] she tried to proceed and I said, we can't move forward as a motion before the court. [01:57:05.120 --> 01:57:16.040] And so she read most of it into the record, stating that the arresting officer lied. [01:57:16.040 --> 01:57:27.920] He charged me with obstructing, I forget the exact name of the charge, resisting officer [01:57:27.920 --> 01:57:37.960] without violence, resisting or obstructing without violence, which is a garbage charge. [01:57:37.960 --> 01:57:40.800] Yeah, it's kind of a catchall charge. [01:57:40.800 --> 01:57:45.400] And he starts with that, but then he went out with a lie. [01:57:45.400 --> 01:57:50.880] He claimed there was a city ordinance that does not exist, which that was his probable [01:57:50.880 --> 01:57:51.880] cause for the stop. [01:57:51.880 --> 01:57:55.840] So, you know, 3 to the 4th and 3, all that. [01:57:55.840 --> 01:58:01.680] Anyway, she couldn't, she kept looking for the state to the state to attorneys for help [01:58:01.680 --> 01:58:06.320] on this and they weren't giving her any help. [01:58:06.320 --> 01:58:07.320] Hang on. [01:58:07.320 --> 01:58:08.320] I am sorry. [01:58:08.320 --> 01:58:09.320] We're out of time. [01:58:09.320 --> 01:58:10.320] You need to call back tomorrow night. [01:58:10.320 --> 01:58:13.760] We're having too much fun with this. [01:58:13.760 --> 01:58:18.200] This is Randy, Randy Kelton, Denver Stevens, Ruval Radio. [01:58:18.200 --> 01:58:24.560] We'll be back tomorrow night on our four hour info marathon, so make sure you call in. [01:58:24.560 --> 01:58:50.720] So thank you all for listening and good night. [01:58:50.720 --> 01:58:56.800] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament [01:58:56.800 --> 01:58:58.000] Recovery Version. [01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:02.960] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible [01:59:02.960 --> 01:59:08.620] says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.620 --> 01:59:11.920] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.920 --> 01:59:20.880] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.880 --> 01:59:26.560] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references plus [01:59:26.560 --> 01:59:30.440] charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.440 --> 01:59:33.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.360] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.360 --> 01:59:48.480] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:48.480 --> 02:00:11.920] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.