[00:00.000 --> 00:05.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:05.000 --> 00:08.000]  Providing the jelly bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.000 --> 00:27.000]  Markets for the 1st of June, 2015 opened up with gold at $1,189.60 an ounce,
[00:27.000 --> 00:32.000]  silver $16.74 an ounce, Texas crude $6.30 a barrel,
[00:32.000 --> 00:41.000]  and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 223 U.S. currency.
[00:41.000 --> 00:46.000]  Today in history, Thursday, June 1st, 2000, the Patent Law Treaty, or PLT,
[00:46.000 --> 00:52.000]  a multilateral treaty, is signed in Geneva, Switzerland by 53 states and the European Patent Organization.
[00:52.000 --> 00:56.000]  Its aim is to harmonize formal patent procedures like filing dates for patent applications,
[00:56.000 --> 01:06.000]  forms and content on patent applications, and representation.
[01:06.000 --> 01:10.000]  In recent news, on Friday of last week, Ross Ulbricht was sentenced to life in prison
[01:10.000 --> 01:14.000]  without the possibility of parole for his role in creating and running Silk Road,
[01:14.000 --> 01:17.000]  a billion-dollar anonymous black market website.
[01:17.000 --> 01:22.000]  Catherine Forrest, the judge in the case, gave Ross a sentence beyond what even the prosecution had requested.
[01:22.000 --> 01:25.000]  The minimum he could have gotten was 20 years. She instead gave him life.
[01:25.000 --> 01:29.000]  Ross was also ordered to pay massive fines of over $183 million,
[01:29.000 --> 01:33.000]  what the prosecution had estimated to be the total sales of illegal drugs and counterfeit IDs
[01:33.000 --> 01:38.000]  through the Silk Road at a certain Bitcoin exchange rate over the course of its time online.
[01:38.000 --> 01:43.000]  Any revenue from the government's sale of the Bitcoin seized from Silk Road and Ulbricht's laptop
[01:43.000 --> 01:47.000]  will be applied to that debt. Ross's supporters, family, as well as anonymity
[01:47.000 --> 01:54.000]  and property rights advocates will be pushing for retrial.
[01:54.000 --> 01:57.000]  ABC News was the first to report on an internal investigation
[01:57.000 --> 02:00.000]  conducted by the Transportation Security Administration's Red Teams,
[02:00.000 --> 02:05.000]  who pose as passengers, which revealed security failures at dozens of the nation's busiest airports.
[02:05.000 --> 02:08.000]  Apparently, these undercover investigators were able to smuggle,
[02:08.000 --> 02:14.000]  mock explosives and band weapons through checkpoints in a whopping 95% of trials,
[02:14.000 --> 02:16.000]  failing 67 out of 70 tests conducted.
[02:16.000 --> 02:21.000]  Privacy, travel and liberty groups, which have been critical of the TSA DHS screening procedures,
[02:21.000 --> 02:31.000]  have been claiming this for years. Losing privacy and liberty do not equate to gaining safety and security.
[02:31.000 --> 02:37.000]  The United States Senate yesterday, unable to block parliamentary filibuster maneuvers by Senator Rand Paul,
[02:37.000 --> 02:41.000]  let three controversial provisions of the Patriot Act expire at midnight.
[02:41.000 --> 02:45.000]  The Patriot Act will expire tonight, Rand Paul said, but it will only be temporary.
[02:45.000 --> 02:47.000]  They will ultimately get their way.
[02:47.000 --> 02:51.000]  If you want to start a lowdown, it's currently looking for sponsors. If you have a product or a service
[02:51.000 --> 02:56.000]  that you would like to advertise on the lowdown, feel free to give us a call at 210-863-5617.
[02:56.000 --> 03:18.000]  This has been your Lowdown for June 1st, 2015.
[03:26.000 --> 03:36.000]  This has been your Lowdown for June 1st, 2015.
[03:36.000 --> 03:47.000]  This has been your Lowdown for June 1st, 2016.
[03:47.000 --> 03:55.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree Round up all of them dead boys in the high up street
[03:57.000 --> 03:59.000]  For all the people to see
[04:01.000 --> 04:09.000]  That's just the one thing you should always find You gotta saddle up your boys, you gotta draw a hard line
[04:09.000 --> 04:17.000]  When the gun smoke settles, we'll sing a victory tune And we'll haul me back at the local school
[04:17.000 --> 04:27.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing West kid for my men, bear for my horses
[04:27.000 --> 04:40.000]  We ain't got too many gangsters doing dirty things Too much corruption and crime
[04:40.000 --> 04:46.000]  Alright folks, good evening. This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:46.000 --> 04:53.000]  It is the Monday night show, June 1st, 2015, and we are rolling right along.
[04:53.000 --> 05:02.000]  We are now approaching the halfway mark of this new year with not so new problems and issues
[05:02.000 --> 05:05.000]  that have been following us around for decades.
[05:05.000 --> 05:11.000]  Now, one of those, however, I'm going to give you a slam dunk way to fix tonight.
[05:11.000 --> 05:19.000]  And one of those issues is the red light camera situation here in Texas.
[05:19.000 --> 05:27.000]  Now, I can't believe that I hadn't thought to check on this before, but I came across a video
[05:27.000 --> 05:37.000]  where Senator Nichols, down here at the Texas Legislature, is conducting a transportation committee hearing
[05:37.000 --> 05:40.000]  about the red light cameras.
[05:40.000 --> 05:46.000]  And you can go on YouTube and you can do Texas Senator Lam Bass Cops on red light cameras.
[05:46.000 --> 05:52.000]  And pull that video up and watch it. It's very short. It's like a minute and eight seconds.
[05:52.000 --> 05:56.000]  It's very short, but it's very, very telling.
[05:56.000 --> 06:05.000]  Anyhow, I took it upon myself, based upon what was in that video, to go spend the afternoon
[06:05.000 --> 06:14.000]  researching the statutes on the red light cameras, and I'll be danged if what's in the video is not 100% correct.
[06:14.000 --> 06:25.000]  And what it is correct about is the fact that there is absolutely no authority in that entire chapter
[06:25.000 --> 06:35.000]  for municipalities to issue citations based upon red light camera violations.
[06:35.000 --> 06:44.000]  There is no authority to issue the citation. There is no authority to assess a fine directly
[06:44.000 --> 06:50.000]  or to demand payment of that fine through the citation process.
[06:50.000 --> 07:03.000]  Instead, it specifically states that any violation must be done as either a civil or administrative penalty.
[07:03.000 --> 07:10.000]  Now, the only way the administrative penalty could be applied is if we work for the city,
[07:10.000 --> 07:17.000]  we're contracted with the city, and by that contract or employment, we are obligated to abide by that
[07:17.000 --> 07:24.000]  while we're using city property or other government property and running a red light.
[07:24.000 --> 07:31.000]  The civil process is the only one by which they can assess a fine against we the people.
[07:31.000 --> 07:40.000]  And any time that fine exceeds $20, we have the right to a jury trial.
[07:40.000 --> 07:46.000]  That is protected in the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution.
[07:46.000 --> 07:56.000]  Any case at common law in excess of $20, the right to trial by jury shall be preserved.
[07:56.000 --> 08:03.000]  Now, what I want to do is I want to read you the rewrite I did on the Texas only at this time,
[08:03.000 --> 08:09.000]  unless you want to check your state statutes and see if it works exactly the same way there as it does here,
[08:09.000 --> 08:11.000]  then you can adapt the letter accordingly.
[08:11.000 --> 08:17.000]  But for the interim, to my knowledge, the only state that can use the second version of this,
[08:17.000 --> 08:22.000]  and it says this specifically for Texas, is Texas.
[08:22.000 --> 08:26.000]  Now, what I want to do is just read to you the brunt of what's in this
[08:26.000 --> 08:30.000]  in the challenge to jurisdiction and citation section.
[08:30.000 --> 08:38.000]  On or about whatever date, a letter arrived at my address via the United States Postal Service claiming to be a citation
[08:38.000 --> 08:42.000]  and stating that either by direct action or reason of ownership,
[08:42.000 --> 08:47.000]  I had allegedly committed some violation of a red light camera enforcement law
[08:47.000 --> 08:53.000]  within the city of whatever Texas on the alleged date of whatever.
[08:53.000 --> 08:55.000]  Okay?
[08:55.000 --> 09:01.000]  Now, be it known that I am aware, as you should and are deemed to also be,
[09:01.000 --> 09:10.000]  of the fact that Chapter 707 of the Texas Transportation Code does not in any way or manner whatsoever
[09:10.000 --> 09:18.000]  authorize a municipality to issue a citation and demand a payment in place of
[09:18.000 --> 09:24.000]  or in conjunction with a red light camera notice or attempt to forcefully or coercively
[09:24.000 --> 09:34.000]  or coercive collection for a citation issued without any authority of law.
[09:34.000 --> 09:35.000]  Let's see.
[09:35.000 --> 09:41.000]  Therefore, I shall proceed with the mutual understanding that you are fully aware that all of your current and future actions
[09:41.000 --> 09:48.000]  in this matter shall be knowing and willfully done under color of law rather than any actual lawful authority.
[09:48.000 --> 09:55.000]  And you are admonished to be aware that you are proceeding at your own risk of being held personally liable for these actions.
[09:55.000 --> 10:05.000]  It can be plainly seen in Section 707.007 Transportation Code that the only actions authorized against anyone
[10:05.000 --> 10:10.000]  for a red light camera enforcement action is a civil or administrative penalty.
[10:10.000 --> 10:15.000]  There is no mention of the issuance of a citation for any purpose whatsoever.
[10:15.000 --> 10:22.000]  And if it can even be said that anything therein could lawfully be applied at all to any member of the public,
[10:22.000 --> 10:29.000]  it could only be the civil penalty, not the administrative, as the people have a fundamental right to do process
[10:29.000 --> 10:33.000]  which is not available to them under administrative proceedings and sanctions.
[10:33.000 --> 10:39.000]  Nor are they employed by or contracted with the corporate municipality in any manner
[10:39.000 --> 10:45.000]  or to any degree requiring them to comply with the internal policies and procedures thereof.
[10:45.000 --> 10:49.000]  This is readily demonstrable by watching the linked video.
[10:49.000 --> 10:53.000]  In the video, Senator Robert Nichols of Texas is seen conducting a legislative hearing
[10:53.000 --> 10:59.000]  in which he can be seen discussing this very issue with a panel of law enforcement and municipal personnel
[10:59.000 --> 11:05.000]  advocating the unconstitutional continued use of red light cameras.
[11:05.000 --> 11:11.000]  In that video, Senator Nichols specifically asked the three law enforcement members of the panel
[11:11.000 --> 11:21.000]  if they could point to the statute that authorizes a municipality to issue a citation in relation to an alleged red light camera violation.
[11:21.000 --> 11:27.000]  Not a single member of that panel, including those in law enforcement, could identify the statute
[11:27.000 --> 11:33.000]  that authorized this abuse of power and authority in violation of and under cover of law.
[11:33.000 --> 11:38.000]  And that is because there is no such provision in statute.
[11:38.000 --> 11:41.000]  I then put in a link to the video.
[11:41.000 --> 11:48.000]  Therefore, there is absolutely no jurisdiction whatsoever that is or can be invested in any Texas court
[11:48.000 --> 11:55.000]  to hear any cause based upon such citation, nor can the citation be the sole supporting basis
[11:55.000 --> 11:59.000]  for any form of civil action or criminal complaint against me.
[11:59.000 --> 12:06.000]  Let me be absolutely clear, the Texas legislature has granted no statutory authority of any kind
[12:06.000 --> 12:13.000]  to any municipality and agency thereof or to any out-of-state third-party contract vendor
[12:13.000 --> 12:19.000]  to issue a citation in relation to an alleged red light camera violation.
[12:19.000 --> 12:25.000]  As a matter of law, in any civil case at common law where the value at issue is greater than $20,
[12:25.000 --> 12:28.000]  the right of trial by jury is protected and preserved.
[12:28.000 --> 12:31.000]  I then have the constitutional amendment in there.
[12:31.000 --> 12:37.000]  In suits at common law where the value and controversy shall exceed $20, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,
[12:37.000 --> 12:42.000]  and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States
[12:42.000 --> 12:45.000]  then according to the rules of the common law.
[12:45.000 --> 12:51.000]  Therefore, enforcement of any such civil penalty first requires the right of due process in the form
[12:51.000 --> 12:59.000]  of an actual civil trial before a proper jury, just like any other civil suit must endure prior to a lawful and valid judgment.
[12:59.000 --> 13:08.000]  Such proceedings cannot be convened or presided over by anyone other than an actual judge of the judicial department of government,
[13:08.000 --> 13:15.000]  not a law enforcement officer or his agency, the same as in any other such case.
[13:15.000 --> 13:19.000]  To do otherwise would constitute a violation of the Separation of Powers Clause
[13:19.000 --> 13:23.000]  found in Article 2 of the Constitution for the State of Texas.
[13:23.000 --> 13:30.000]  Furthermore, the people are not a part of the corporate municipality for the purpose of being subjected to its administrative rules
[13:30.000 --> 13:34.000]  and regulations, as those are internally applicable only.
[13:34.000 --> 13:40.000]  Therefore, lawfully speaking, an administrative penalty can only be applied to one who is employed by
[13:40.000 --> 13:46.000]  or contracted with the corporate municipality itself, and by which employment or contractual agreement
[13:46.000 --> 13:49.000]  they are bound to comply with such rules and regulations,
[13:49.000 --> 13:55.000]  neither of which to my personal knowledge and understanding applies to either myself as one of the people
[13:55.000 --> 13:58.000]  or to any other member of the general public.
[13:58.000 --> 14:06.000]  There are simply no crimes defined against the public by which you or your employer may lawfully issue a citation
[14:06.000 --> 14:12.000]  for the purpose of demanding a revenue payment as you attempt to do in any other traffic citation matter.
[14:12.000 --> 14:20.000]  In fact, the only crimes defined by Chapter 707 are relative to the activities and actions of the personnel
[14:20.000 --> 14:26.000]  operating those cameras, not the general public or any individual member thereof.
[14:26.000 --> 14:34.000]  Therefore, you should already be aware and knowledgeable of the fact that by simple issuance of this fraudulent citation,
[14:34.000 --> 14:39.000]  your actions constitute a Class A misdemeanor criminal act under Texas statute.
[14:39.000 --> 14:45.000]  To wit, Texas Penal Code 32.48 simulating legal process.
[14:45.000 --> 14:53.000]  As I firmly believe that the citation is a printed document under the provisions of Section 32.48 Penal Code,
[14:53.000 --> 14:59.000]  it is my belief and understanding that your knowing and willful purpose in the issuance of this citation
[14:59.000 --> 15:08.000]  is to recklessly cause to be delivered to me a document that simulates a complaint or other court process
[15:08.000 --> 15:16.000]  with the intent of inducing a payment of claim as made by you or your employer in the form of the citation,
[15:16.000 --> 15:25.000]  as well as to cause me to submit to the punitive authority of the document and to take some action in response to the document,
[15:25.000 --> 15:29.000]  in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
[15:29.000 --> 15:35.000]  And just in case you didn't realize it, folks, those are the specific elements required to commit a violation
[15:35.000 --> 15:39.000]  of 32.48 Penal Code simulating legal process.
[15:39.000 --> 15:42.000]  So I covered each of those points in the letter.
[15:42.000 --> 15:45.000]  Since I've got just a little bit over a minute before we go to break,
[15:45.000 --> 15:50.000]  I'm going to read just another paragraph and then we'll go to break and I'll finish it on the other side.
[15:50.000 --> 15:53.000]  It's only got a little bit left.
[15:53.000 --> 15:54.000]  Now be honest.
[15:54.000 --> 16:00.000]  That is your intended purpose in printing and mailing the citation, is it not?
[16:00.000 --> 16:07.000]  Therefore, I hereby inform you that it is my stated intention to file a criminal complaint against you personally
[16:07.000 --> 16:13.000]  and any other personnel involved in the process of issuing these unlawful and illegal citations,
[16:13.000 --> 16:20.000]  as I have reason to believe and do believe that these actions are knowingly and willfully perpetrated under color of law
[16:20.000 --> 16:25.000]  and in direct violation of Section 32.48 Penal Code.
[16:25.000 --> 16:26.000]  All right, folks.
[16:26.000 --> 16:31.000]  I'll finish up with the last page after we get back from this upcoming break, which is just about to start.
[16:31.000 --> 16:33.000]  There we go.
[16:33.000 --> 16:34.000]  All right.
[16:34.000 --> 16:36.000]  Lisette in California, I see you there on the board.
[16:36.000 --> 16:40.000]  So if you'll hang on when I finish this up on the other side, I'll take your call.
[16:40.000 --> 16:45.000]  Folks, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:45.000 --> 16:46.000]  Give us a call.
[16:46.000 --> 16:47.000]  Get in line.
[16:47.000 --> 16:48.000]  Give us a question.
[16:48.000 --> 16:49.000]  Give us a complaint.
[16:49.000 --> 16:50.000]  Give us a query.
[16:50.000 --> 16:52.000]  We'll see what we can do to help you out, if at all possible.
[16:52.000 --> 16:56.000]  Y'all hang in there. We will be right back.
[17:22.000 --> 17:25.000]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.000 --> 17:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:31.000 --> 17:39.000]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.000 --> 17:47.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:47.000 --> 17:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:52.000 --> 17:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:59.000 --> 18:00.000]  Order now.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 19:01.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:31.000 --> 19:51.000]  Hi, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:51.000 --> 19:56.000]  All right. Now, down to the last page of this new letter for the red light cameras.
[19:56.000 --> 20:01.000]  The last page is titled, Lawful Demand and Notice of Potential Torture.
[20:01.000 --> 20:07.000]  Be it known that I hereby demand that you rescind this citation in writing,
[20:07.000 --> 20:13.000]  provide a copy of that writing to me at the return address on the envelope in which this notice was delivered,
[20:13.000 --> 20:21.000]  and cease and desist in any and all of your unlawful attempts to perpetrate fraud upon me or any member of my family
[20:21.000 --> 20:25.000]  or to extort payment from me by threat, duress, or coercion under color of law.
[20:25.000 --> 20:31.000]  And I place you on lawful notice of my intent to seek any and all legal remedy against you personally
[20:31.000 --> 20:35.000]  and all others involved if you fail to comply.
[20:35.000 --> 20:43.000]  Furthermore, be advised that by further failing or refusing to fully comply in any manner with this demand to cease and desist,
[20:43.000 --> 20:49.000]  you will be acting without benefit whatsoever of any form of immunity from personal liability
[20:49.000 --> 20:56.000]  for any and all actual and punitive damages incurred by me, as you will not be acting under any authority
[20:56.000 --> 21:02.000]  found in law or statute that grants you discretionary decision-making authority in this matter.
[21:02.000 --> 21:07.000]  Nor can it be said that you would have either qualified or official immunity as protection from suit
[21:07.000 --> 21:15.000]  and personal liability for your continued actions as you are operating entirely outside the authority supplied by law and statute,
[21:15.000 --> 21:22.000]  and therefore all lawful jurisdiction for which you have no immunity from suit.
[21:22.000 --> 21:26.000]  In this lawful demand to cease and desist, fail not.
[21:26.000 --> 21:32.000]  All right, folks in Texas, that is the new red light camera letter.
[21:32.000 --> 21:40.000]  If you want a copy of it, you can look it up on Facebook if you're out there and have friended me there.
[21:40.000 --> 21:45.000]  It's TALLAW, T-A-O-space-L-A-U-W.
[21:45.000 --> 21:52.000]  It is posted on my wall, both the video and the link to the updated letter.
[21:52.000 --> 21:58.000]  I'm going to have to keep a running tally on how many revisions of this I've got,
[21:58.000 --> 22:03.000]  but I've got a few minor edits to it that I may have to stick up there in place of the one that's there.
[22:03.000 --> 22:09.000]  So if you'll give me until tomorrow, I may have an updated version with a few minor grammatical corrections in it.
[22:09.000 --> 22:13.000]  All right, that being said, I would also like to address one other thing,
[22:13.000 --> 22:28.000]  and that is the speech given by Senator Rand Paul dealing with the Patriot Act coming up for reenactment or however you want to put it.
[22:28.000 --> 22:35.000]  The speech that he gave, I believe it was the day before yesterday, was actually very good and on point.
[22:35.000 --> 22:40.000]  It's the kind of speech that you wish most politicians would understand and adhere to.
[22:40.000 --> 22:45.000]  Now, whether or not he has done everything he should have done the way he should have done it,
[22:45.000 --> 22:51.000]  while he's been elected I can't say I haven't followed his career as closely as I did that of his father.
[22:51.000 --> 23:03.000]  But hopefully he will not fall into the same trench that so many other Johnny-come-lately-want-to-help-everybody politicians do.
[23:03.000 --> 23:10.000]  It's great to go up there with the intent to help get rid of the things that are destroying this country.
[23:10.000 --> 23:16.000]  It's another thing entirely to be able to get it done when you're the only one pushing for them.
[23:16.000 --> 23:25.000]  That being said, what usually happens is those that want to bring the Constitution back into full force and effect
[23:25.000 --> 23:34.000]  are sorely outnumbered and outgunned both politically and monetarily by those that are selling us out.
[23:34.000 --> 23:42.000]  And so in order to get any cooperation and traction whatsoever on any type of change for the better,
[23:42.000 --> 23:52.000]  the newcomers trying to bring us back to order, more or less, or essentially speaking, must compromise.
[23:52.000 --> 24:02.000]  The problem is is each compromise requires more and more latitude each time it comes around for them to get anything done
[24:02.000 --> 24:11.000]  until eventually they're doing the same things that the entrenched, indoctrinated, and controlling people already are doing.
[24:11.000 --> 24:18.000]  They're looking out for themselves, their wealth, their prosperity, but they're not looking out for us.
[24:18.000 --> 24:26.000]  That is the pitfalls that await any of those that go into politics in America alone
[24:26.000 --> 24:33.000]  or in numbers so few that they have no mutual support and capability to accomplish much.
[24:33.000 --> 24:37.000]  We need to understand that as a people.
[24:37.000 --> 24:46.000]  We need to stop electing if we actually are electing anyone that's ever held public office before.
[24:46.000 --> 24:48.000]  We just need to stop doing that.
[24:48.000 --> 24:52.000]  There should be a one-term limit for every politician.
[24:52.000 --> 24:58.000]  I don't care what his job title. A one-term limit.
[24:58.000 --> 25:05.000]  Don't let them stay up there so long, then so entrenched, and become so entrenched,
[25:05.000 --> 25:11.000]  that they control the political playing field just with a wave of their hand.
[25:11.000 --> 25:17.000]  That is not good for the American people in any way, shape, or form,
[25:17.000 --> 25:25.000]  but it is what we've had for generation upon generation here in America, and it needs to stop.
[25:25.000 --> 25:32.000]  So, folks, wake up, smell the BS, because they're certainly throwing enough of it at you.
[25:32.000 --> 25:35.000]  All right. That being said, I'm going to take the first caller.
[25:35.000 --> 25:42.000]  I've got about four minutes for break. So, Lisette, what can we do for you?
[25:42.000 --> 25:45.000]  Yes. Hi, Eddie.
[25:45.000 --> 25:49.000]  I'm calling you because I'm completely frustrated. I was feeling great.
[25:49.000 --> 25:54.000]  Wait, Lisette, are you on your speakerphone or are you on a – what are you on?
[25:54.000 --> 25:57.000]  No, I'm holding it to my ear.
[25:57.000 --> 25:58.000]  Okay. All right.
[25:58.000 --> 26:02.000]  Just try to speak directly into it because you keep fading in and out.
[26:02.000 --> 26:05.000]  Oh, let's see. Is that better?
[26:05.000 --> 26:09.000]  That'll do for the moment.
[26:09.000 --> 26:16.000]  Yeah, I was steamrolled in court with this California Highway Patrol issue.
[26:16.000 --> 26:22.000]  I don't know if you remember me. I spoke with you before.
[26:22.000 --> 26:29.000]  Yeah, he's the one that pulled you over, and the infraction is not a crime business, right?
[26:29.000 --> 26:41.000]  Well, yeah, actually, my cousin was pulled over, but I'm stuck handling the ball because she's off and she's a minor.
[26:41.000 --> 26:47.000]  So, anyways, her parent wouldn't authorize her to come to court, so I did the motion,
[26:47.000 --> 26:52.000]  and they didn't really hear the motion, and then they had me go to another –
[26:52.000 --> 26:56.000]  because I didn't want to do the temporary judge, and then I went to the real judge,
[26:56.000 --> 27:02.000]  and then he had me wait until after lunch, and he's like, oh, I read the motion, and the motion's denied.
[27:02.000 --> 27:05.000]  So they basically tried to turn it into an arraignment,
[27:05.000 --> 27:14.000]  and he said he entered a plea of not guilty on my behalf and waived the $310 on OR,
[27:14.000 --> 27:19.000]  so they have a court date coming over 45 days for a trial.
[27:19.000 --> 27:23.000]  So I wanted to find out, like, what can I do? What can be done?
[27:23.000 --> 27:29.000]  Because if this is illegal, it just seems like they're just proceeding doing whatever they want to do to make sure they get –
[27:29.000 --> 27:33.000]  Well, that's what the trial court always does. That's what I told you.
[27:33.000 --> 27:37.000]  If you did go to trial, understand that you don't go to trial to win.
[27:37.000 --> 27:43.000]  You go to trial to make a record for appeal, and that's what you have to do.
[27:43.000 --> 27:52.000]  This means that you have to make your argument based upon the case law and everything else about what the officer did
[27:52.000 --> 27:55.000]  and why he has no authority to do it.
[27:55.000 --> 28:00.000]  You've got to put that in your written motions, and that's what's got to be argued at trial.
[28:00.000 --> 28:09.000]  You have to do that by getting the officer to answer questions about the information and why they stopped you,
[28:09.000 --> 28:15.000]  whether or not it's an infraction versus a crime, and so on and so forth.
[28:15.000 --> 28:25.000]  Okay, and that was basically in the motion, and I crafted the motion, which was actually reviewed –
[28:25.000 --> 28:27.000]  Yeah, I understand that's what's in the motion.
[28:27.000 --> 28:33.000]  Just make sure that that's what you argue at trial, regardless of how they ruled on the motion.
[28:33.000 --> 28:38.000]  Now, what you have to be real careful of is you have to be careful of the prosecution
[28:38.000 --> 28:44.000]  attempting to make a motion in Lemony that forbids you to talk about anything that was in the pretrial motions
[28:44.000 --> 28:46.000]  that were denied.
[28:46.000 --> 28:52.000]  That is a direct violation of your right to put on a defense.
[28:52.000 --> 28:55.000]  Now, when you say the prosecution, the trial –
[28:55.000 --> 29:03.000]  The prosecution will make a motion to the court – it's called a motion in Lemony – that you not be allowed to discuss
[29:03.000 --> 29:15.000]  or bring up any of the points that are disallowed in the motion when it was denied.
[29:15.000 --> 29:22.000]  And basically what they're trying to do is to prevent you from arguing any type of defense based upon the law itself,
[29:22.000 --> 29:24.000]  and they can't do that.
[29:24.000 --> 29:27.000]  That's a due process violation.
[29:27.000 --> 29:35.000]  Okay, when you say the prosecution, who are you referring to? Because they have the trial court where it's supposed to be –
[29:35.000 --> 29:39.000]  Did you ask for a trial by jury or a bench trial?
[29:39.000 --> 29:45.000]  I asked for a trial by jury. They said that doesn't exist in an infractive case.
[29:45.000 --> 29:49.000]  Well, that's another problem that you've got to worry about there.
[29:49.000 --> 29:53.000]  Hang on a second, I've got to break, and then we'll come right back, okay?
[29:53.000 --> 30:00.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, 512-646-1984. Give us a call.
[30:00.000 --> 30:06.000]  Look into my eyes. You're getting very sleepy.
[30:06.000 --> 30:13.000]  B-movies make hypnosis look like creepy mind control or a bunch of nonsense, but it's time to set the record straight.
[30:13.000 --> 30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with more in just a moment.
[30:16.000 --> 30:22.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:32.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy – it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:38.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:38.000 --> 30:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.000 --> 30:50.000]  Have you ever found yourself driving past your exit or losing yourself in a great book?
[30:50.000 --> 30:52.000]  Have you experienced hypnosis?
[30:52.000 --> 30:58.000]  Hypnosis is a natural state of consciousness where your mind becomes very focused and open to positive changes,
[30:58.000 --> 31:01.000]  like giving up smoking. But you never give up your free will.
[31:01.000 --> 31:07.000]  New research has shown hypnosis can help patients do better in surgery, heal faster after operations,
[31:07.000 --> 31:10.000]  and even avoid nausea from chemotherapy.
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  And I can tell you from experience that it really works.
[31:13.000 --> 31:19.000]  With the help of a hypnotist friend, I sailed through a recent surgery and recovered quickly with hardly any pain medication.
[31:19.000 --> 31:21.000]  The doctors were amazed.
[31:21.000 --> 31:25.000]  Look into my eyes and you'll see a calmer, more relaxed patient.
[31:25.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:55.000 --> 32:00.000]  Call 888-910-4367 only at FUSA.org.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:34.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:46.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:51.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:00.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:00.000 --> 33:06.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:30.000 --> 33:40.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:40.000 --> 33:43.000]  All right, we are talking to Lisette in California.
[33:43.000 --> 33:50.000]  Now, Lisette, you do have the contact information from my friend Kevin out there in California, right?
[33:50.000 --> 34:00.000]  I do, and he's been helping me, but it's crazy because when you get there, it's like the things are different.
[34:00.000 --> 34:04.000]  It's like they're not even trying to hear me. It's like they're hearing me.
[34:04.000 --> 34:11.000]  That's always the way it is. They don't listen. They don't do what they're supposed to do except that.
[34:11.000 --> 34:13.000]  Understand that.
[34:13.000 --> 34:20.000]  Do not let that be the reason you get flustered and frustrated because you have forewarning that's how it's going to be.
[34:20.000 --> 34:24.000]  It'd be one thing if you walked in there with it being a complete and total shocking surprise.
[34:24.000 --> 34:29.000]  That's not the case. I'm telling you right now, that's how it works.
[34:29.000 --> 34:31.000]  Okay?
[34:31.000 --> 34:37.000]  Do not let that be the reason you get upset by what's going on, what you're doing.
[34:37.000 --> 34:43.000]  Okay? Do not let that be the reason you get upset by what's going on.
[34:43.000 --> 34:50.000]  What you need to do is pay attention to what he tells you, continue talking to him, continue having him help you,
[34:50.000 --> 34:58.000]  go to court, make the record you need to make, and then make somebody pay for having you there in the first place.
[34:58.000 --> 35:02.000]  Do not go in there with the expectation of winning.
[35:02.000 --> 35:06.000]  Are we understanding each other?
[35:06.000 --> 35:08.000]  No. Yeah, I guess.
[35:08.000 --> 35:15.000]  You are there to make an argument and a record for appeal, not to win.
[35:15.000 --> 35:20.000]  Because they are going to do the same thing to prevent you from winning.
[35:20.000 --> 35:24.000]  They're going to not play by the rules.
[35:24.000 --> 35:25.000]  Okay.
[35:25.000 --> 35:32.000]  Your job is to document every single time they do not play by the rules.
[35:32.000 --> 35:37.000]  That's how they're going to lose.
[35:37.000 --> 35:38.000]  Okay.
[35:38.000 --> 35:44.000]  So the fact that I was insisting on a trial by jury, and they're saying no trial by jury exists.
[35:44.000 --> 35:46.000]  I asked for a different venue.
[35:46.000 --> 35:49.000]  They said that no, there's no trial by jury in the traffic.
[35:49.000 --> 35:50.000]  So they had...
[35:50.000 --> 35:55.000]  Have you talked to Kevin about how that works out there?
[35:55.000 --> 35:58.000]  I have not.
[35:58.000 --> 35:59.000]  Okay.
[35:59.000 --> 36:04.000]  So I just went today, and I was like, let me give him a rest, because I had to call him at court,
[36:04.000 --> 36:08.000]  because I panicked, because I go in there, and then they want you to sign some waiver
[36:08.000 --> 36:11.000]  that your case is going to be heard by not a judge.
[36:11.000 --> 36:15.000]  So I didn't agree to that, and then that's how they had me wait to see the judge.
[36:15.000 --> 36:18.000]  The judge read the motion, and then he denied the motion.
[36:18.000 --> 36:22.000]  He entered a not guilty, and I was saying, well, Your Honor, I'm not here for an arraignment.
[36:22.000 --> 36:24.000]  I'm here for my motion.
[36:24.000 --> 36:29.000]  Well, your motion's denied, so I'm going to enter a not guilty plea on your behalf.
[36:29.000 --> 36:32.000]  And then he requested bail, and I said, well, bail for what?
[36:32.000 --> 36:33.000]  I haven't been charged with any crime.
[36:33.000 --> 36:36.000]  So I'm following, like, the information you guys are giving me.
[36:36.000 --> 36:39.000]  Like I said, it's like it's working, but they're, like, slow stepping.
[36:39.000 --> 36:42.000]  So he's like, well, enter an OR in your own requirements.
[36:42.000 --> 36:47.000]  And so he sends me down to the clerk, and then they have me sign this arraignment paper,
[36:47.000 --> 36:55.000]  which is a request for trial, not guilty plea, for July 7th.
[36:55.000 --> 36:58.000]  Excuse me, July, yeah, July 7th.
[36:58.000 --> 37:01.000]  Did you sign it?
[37:01.000 --> 37:02.000]  Yeah.
[37:02.000 --> 37:04.000]  Why?
[37:04.000 --> 37:07.000]  It says agreement to appear for trial.
[37:07.000 --> 37:09.000]  That's kind of not my point.
[37:09.000 --> 37:11.000]  I don't care what it says.
[37:11.000 --> 37:13.000]  Why did you sign it?
[37:13.000 --> 37:17.000]  Because they said that was the only option, and honestly,
[37:17.000 --> 37:23.000]  my phone was dead after being in there all day from 10 in the morning to 2.30.
[37:23.000 --> 37:25.000]  Let me ask you this.
[37:25.000 --> 37:34.000]  What do you think the worst thing that could have happened would have been had you refused to sign it and left?
[37:34.000 --> 37:36.000]  I have no idea.
[37:36.000 --> 37:37.000]  I don't know, I guess.
[37:37.000 --> 37:38.000]  I don't know.
[37:38.000 --> 37:39.000]  I don't know.
[37:39.000 --> 37:45.000]  I would have just tacked a bunch of stuff onto my license and blocked my driver's license.
[37:45.000 --> 37:50.000]  Well, that's not necessarily true because you haven't been convicted of anything.
[37:50.000 --> 37:56.000]  See, the thing is they're wanting you to enter a plea, but no one's given you an actual complaint.
[37:56.000 --> 38:02.000]  By entering the plea, you waived your right to challenge whatever complaint they put up there.
[38:02.000 --> 38:05.000]  But I didn't enter the plea, the judge did.
[38:05.000 --> 38:11.000]  That's why you should not have signed it.
[38:11.000 --> 38:13.000]  Do you follow?
[38:13.000 --> 38:21.000]  Yeah, I follow, but in all the help that Kevin's getting, he didn't mention anything about not signing this thing if they gave me this thing.
[38:21.000 --> 38:23.000]  Well, you need...
[38:23.000 --> 38:25.000]  I understand that.
[38:25.000 --> 38:29.000]  He may not have thought that far ahead with all the other stuff he's got, but...
[38:29.000 --> 38:31.000]  Right, so now what does that mean?
[38:31.000 --> 38:33.000]  Well, again...
[38:33.000 --> 38:36.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, hold on, hold on.
[38:36.000 --> 38:39.000]  I don't operate in the courts in California.
[38:39.000 --> 38:42.000]  I can't tell you what all of their process and procedure is.
[38:42.000 --> 38:45.000]  He can.
[38:45.000 --> 38:46.000]  Right.
[38:46.000 --> 38:47.000]  Because he does it all the time.
[38:47.000 --> 38:50.000]  He helps folks with this all the time.
[38:50.000 --> 38:52.000]  I only get to talk to them here.
[38:52.000 --> 38:57.000]  I don't actually get to go to court and see what the California morons are doing.
[38:57.000 --> 38:59.000]  Right.
[38:59.000 --> 39:12.000]  Okay, so while I understand your frustration, at this stage, I'm not the one to be asking what to do because the what to do, he's going to know a lot better than me.
[39:12.000 --> 39:14.000]  Right.
[39:14.000 --> 39:23.000]  Now, the one thing I can tell you is that certain things they do do are universally stupid and unjust and deny due process.
[39:23.000 --> 39:27.000]  And what you've discussed is one of them.
[39:27.000 --> 39:33.000]  Okay, by entering a plea on my behalf when I wasn't there for an arraignment, I was there for the motion.
[39:33.000 --> 39:35.000]  The motion is denied.
[39:35.000 --> 39:47.000]  So then the judge just steamrolls on and says that they're entering a plea of not guilty on my behalf.
[39:47.000 --> 39:51.000]  And when that happened, you should have immediately objected.
[39:51.000 --> 40:01.000]  Anytime they ever tell you they're entering a plea on your behalf and you haven't refused to enter a plea, but all you have to do is ask the court.
[40:01.000 --> 40:09.000]  Is the court willing to accept an unconscionable plea that will deprive me of my due process rights?
[40:09.000 --> 40:12.000]  That's all you have to ask him.
[40:12.000 --> 40:14.000]  And of course, what's he going to say?
[40:14.000 --> 40:18.000]  Yes.
[40:18.000 --> 40:22.000]  And if the court will say no, well, we can't do that, well, great.
[40:22.000 --> 40:28.000]  Then at the moment, because it would be unconscionable of me to do so, I cannot enter a plea.
[40:28.000 --> 40:30.000]  I'm not refusing.
[40:30.000 --> 40:34.000]  I'm just saying at the moment, I can't do that.
[40:34.000 --> 40:41.000]  And the reason for that is is because technically you haven't been given proper service or notice of anything.
[40:41.000 --> 40:46.000]  There's a lot of things that these states are doing to bypass due process and the rights of the accused.
[40:46.000 --> 40:55.000]  They're treating it like they can do whatever they want through these administrative processes, pretending they're judicial processes, and they can't.
[40:55.000 --> 41:08.000]  But those are the things that Kevin will have a lot more information about based upon the California Constitution than what I do because I have not studied the California Constitution in depth.
[41:08.000 --> 41:10.000]  He has.
[41:10.000 --> 41:16.000]  Right.
[41:16.000 --> 41:17.000]  Okay.
[41:17.000 --> 41:18.000]  So I'm not trying to put you off.
[41:18.000 --> 41:28.000]  I'm just telling you, I am no longer your best resource when it comes to questions about what they did and why they did it and what you should do next.
[41:28.000 --> 41:31.000]  Right.
[41:31.000 --> 41:33.000]  All right.
[41:33.000 --> 41:34.000]  Okay.
[41:34.000 --> 41:35.000]  Sounds good.
[41:35.000 --> 41:36.000]  All right.
[41:36.000 --> 41:43.000]  If you do keep us posted, though, I'm more than happy to hear from you and find out how you're progressing and what's going on.
[41:43.000 --> 41:47.000]  But I can't tell you what they're required to do.
[41:47.000 --> 41:49.000]  He can.
[41:49.000 --> 41:50.000]  Yeah, okay.
[41:50.000 --> 41:54.000]  Well, we're progressing is just really, really bumpy, and I feel that I-
[41:54.000 --> 41:56.000]  Well, that's okay.
[41:56.000 --> 41:59.000]  This was never going to be a smooth, paved road.
[41:59.000 --> 42:00.000]  Never was going to be.
[42:00.000 --> 42:06.000]  But if you took that impression from anything I said, then don't.
[42:06.000 --> 42:08.000]  No, I didn't take it that it will be smooth.
[42:08.000 --> 42:16.000]  But I guess I kind of took it that if I come in there and I know what my rights are and what the law is, that they wouldn't just ignore it like I'm-
[42:16.000 --> 42:17.000]  Uh-uh.
[42:17.000 --> 42:26.000]  Doesn't work that way because what they're doing is trying their dead-level best to test the limits of what you think you know.
[42:26.000 --> 42:35.000]  Not just what you know, but how far do you know it and how well do you know it that if we string you along this way, this way, and this way,
[42:35.000 --> 42:42.000]  we're eventually going to hit someplace you're not familiar with, trip you up, and get your money.
[42:42.000 --> 42:44.000]  So they will string you along with what they do.
[42:44.000 --> 42:46.000]  They do it here.
[42:46.000 --> 42:48.000]  It just seems so disgusting, though.
[42:48.000 --> 42:50.000]  That is correct.
[42:50.000 --> 42:57.000]  Welcome to the world of illegal revenue generation by our public servants.
[42:57.000 --> 43:06.000]  I guess I should say unlawful revenue generation by our public servants.
[43:06.000 --> 43:07.000]  Okay?
[43:07.000 --> 43:08.000]  So don't-
[43:08.000 --> 43:09.000]  Yep.
[43:09.000 --> 43:10.000]  Don't lose heart.
[43:10.000 --> 43:11.000]  Keep plugging.
[43:11.000 --> 43:14.000]  Talk to Kevin.
[43:14.000 --> 43:15.000]  Okay.
[43:15.000 --> 43:20.000]  I don't know, I might help someone in the air.
[43:20.000 --> 43:27.000]  When you're mailed a citation or whatever it is, like I said, then she did all this and gave them my information.
[43:27.000 --> 43:28.000]  They mailed it to me.
[43:28.000 --> 43:32.000]  Is that considered a complaint or a no?
[43:32.000 --> 43:36.000]  I do not know what the requisites for an actual complaint are in California.
[43:36.000 --> 43:40.000]  That is something also Kevin would have to show you.
[43:40.000 --> 43:41.000]  Got it.
[43:41.000 --> 43:42.000]  Okay.
[43:42.000 --> 43:43.000]  Thanks a lot.
[43:43.000 --> 43:45.000]  I appreciate that.
[43:45.000 --> 43:46.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[43:46.000 --> 43:47.000]  All right.
[43:47.000 --> 43:48.000]  All right, folks.
[43:48.000 --> 43:49.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Kevin, Michigan.
[43:49.000 --> 43:50.000]  I see you there.
[43:50.000 --> 43:52.000]  I will pick you up when we get back after this break.
[43:52.000 --> 43:55.000]  512-646-1984.
[43:55.000 --> 43:56.000]  Give us a call, folks.
[43:56.000 --> 44:01.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:01.000 --> 44:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.000 --> 44:09.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand
[44:09.000 --> 44:14.000]  4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.000 --> 44:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.000 --> 44:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.000 --> 44:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.000 --> 44:33.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:33.000 --> 44:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[44:39.000 --> 44:43.000]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.000 --> 45:03.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:03.000 --> 45:04.000]  Hello.
[45:04.000 --> 45:09.000]  My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by
[45:09.000 --> 45:13.000]  our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D, here in Austin, Texas.
[45:13.000 --> 45:15.000]  I'm Brave New Books and Chase Payne.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  To see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian EME oil,
[45:28.000 --> 45:31.000]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:38.000]  Call 512-264-4043, or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:48.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.000 --> 46:15.000]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:15.000 --> 46:41.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:41.000 --> 46:43.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:43.000 --> 46:47.000]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[46:47.000 --> 46:51.000]  Right now, we have another caller up, Kev in Michigan.
[46:51.000 --> 46:53.000]  Kev, what can we do for you?
[46:53.000 --> 46:57.000]  How's it going, Eddie?
[46:57.000 --> 47:04.000]  I thought last week about a banking issue, but during the course of that,
[47:04.000 --> 47:14.000]  I spoke to you a while back, probably about a year ago, about a traffic situation
[47:14.000 --> 47:17.000]  I was having up here in Michigan.
[47:17.000 --> 47:25.000]  And I was telling you that the judge said that he had not entered judgment against me.
[47:25.000 --> 47:34.000]  And he sent out that there was some, I guess, building receipts
[47:34.000 --> 47:38.000]  or whatever you want to call them, saying that I owe 400 bucks.
[47:38.000 --> 47:45.000]  So I filed the motion in saying that I want to motion to correct the record.
[47:45.000 --> 47:51.000]  So the judge said that he had not entered judgment.
[47:51.000 --> 47:55.000]  Therefore, he denied my motion to correct the record.
[47:55.000 --> 48:01.000]  So I was just going back and forth with this judge trying to get him to rule on my pleadings
[48:01.000 --> 48:06.000]  because he had already stated that he had not entered judgment.
[48:06.000 --> 48:12.000]  So I filed the motion stating that I wanted to dismissal with prejudice
[48:12.000 --> 48:23.000]  because basically the tickets that were sent to my house saying that I owed money
[48:23.000 --> 48:29.000]  were basically like a threat and tampering with me.
[48:29.000 --> 48:33.000]  And I just kept filing motions.
[48:33.000 --> 48:36.000]  So he never answered me, never answered me.
[48:36.000 --> 48:44.000]  So the other day on, I think, Friday, I go to the mailbox and voila.
[48:44.000 --> 48:54.000]  There is the court envelope saying, oh, this is my judgment on the whole matter.
[48:54.000 --> 49:00.000]  So this is the second judgment against me that I have in this matter.
[49:00.000 --> 49:07.000]  And the opinion that he put together, relevant facts, this discussion and decision,
[49:07.000 --> 49:15.000]  I was cited for not having a seat or they said they pulled me over for not having a seat belt.
[49:15.000 --> 49:26.000]  However, they wrote me for not providing insurance and I had an equipment violation.
[49:26.000 --> 49:36.000]  So basically what was going on with this case is I was trying to get the judge to dismiss it
[49:36.000 --> 49:42.000]  because he had already ruled once and he sent me a letter in the mail.
[49:42.000 --> 49:46.000]  This is the second time this judge has actually contacted me.
[49:46.000 --> 49:50.000]  The first time he said, oh, I never entered judgment against your case,
[49:50.000 --> 49:56.000]  was having, I had the full fee that they assessed against me,
[49:56.000 --> 50:00.000]  right there saying that if I didn't pay it, I was going to lose my license.
[50:00.000 --> 50:10.000]  So now it's like almost a year later and now he decides to rule on my case.
[50:10.000 --> 50:18.000]  He's stating in the opinion, in his opinion, that the violation was against the law
[50:18.000 --> 50:20.000]  for me not to wear a seat belt.
[50:20.000 --> 50:27.000]  That's what gave the officer the right to pull me, or what do you say?
[50:27.000 --> 50:30.000]  Probable cause.
[50:30.000 --> 50:33.000]  Reasonable suspicion of violation of law.
[50:33.000 --> 50:39.000]  That's the exact wording he has in his opinion.
[50:39.000 --> 50:49.000]  So I'm thinking about, I'm thinking that the only route I have now is to file my appeal.
[50:49.000 --> 50:55.000]  So I want to know if it's too late for me to file for indigency,
[50:55.000 --> 51:04.000]  or if that's something I should have did before to try and get the transcript.
[51:04.000 --> 51:05.000]  Okay.
[51:05.000 --> 51:07.000]  Is that a question?
[51:07.000 --> 51:09.000]  Yes, I want to know about that.
[51:09.000 --> 51:11.000]  I don't know if it's the same in Michigan or here,
[51:11.000 --> 51:17.000]  but I've been reading up on it and it seems like the lower court would have to...
[51:17.000 --> 51:19.000]  Was it a court of record?
[51:19.000 --> 51:20.000]  Yes.
[51:20.000 --> 51:21.000]  Okay.
[51:21.000 --> 51:25.000]  Then you have to go through whatever process is required to get that transcript.
[51:25.000 --> 51:29.000]  I don't know if they, if you get them for a fee, who supplies them,
[51:29.000 --> 51:32.000]  who they use as a court reporter, if it's a clerk of the court,
[51:32.000 --> 51:37.000]  or if it's a private court reporter on their own, you'll have to find that out.
[51:37.000 --> 51:40.000]  You'll have to contact the clerk of the court and find out who you have to contact
[51:40.000 --> 51:44.000]  to get a copy of the transcript from that proceeding.
[51:44.000 --> 51:45.000]  Okay.
[51:45.000 --> 51:47.000]  Usually that's done in writing, right?
[51:47.000 --> 51:52.000]  Well, not to find out who you contact, but when you do contact them,
[51:52.000 --> 51:54.000]  yeah, you want to do it in writing.
[51:54.000 --> 51:56.000]  Okay.
[51:56.000 --> 52:03.000]  Yeah, so I'm just perplexed about this whole thing because I know you can enter judgment twice.
[52:03.000 --> 52:09.000]  It seems like it's a double jeopardy matter, but I'm not sure if that's the correct term for...
[52:09.000 --> 52:14.000]  Well, again, if he's saying a judgment was never entered the first time,
[52:14.000 --> 52:22.000]  then what you may have is a fraudulent action there in that piece of paper
[52:22.000 --> 52:25.000]  that they did send you if it's not actually true.
[52:25.000 --> 52:32.000]  See, the problem is a lot of these so-called debt collectors for these municipalities
[52:32.000 --> 52:37.000]  and things all over the country are actually violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
[52:37.000 --> 52:40.000]  with letters just like what you're describing.
[52:40.000 --> 52:45.000]  But in the off chance the court itself is sending out these false statements
[52:45.000 --> 52:48.000]  saying that a judgment's been rendered when it hasn't,
[52:48.000 --> 52:55.000]  that may be some sort of judicial malfeasance that could get them kicked off the bench
[52:55.000 --> 52:58.000]  or arrested even for fraud.
[52:58.000 --> 53:01.000]  So you need to be figuring out what they're supposed to do
[53:01.000 --> 53:06.000]  and how they're supposed to do it and whether or not that is what they're doing.
[53:06.000 --> 53:11.000]  Okay, so what term would you search to...
[53:11.000 --> 53:14.000]  Give me a term to search their code with.
[53:14.000 --> 53:16.000]  Well, it's not going to be a term.
[53:16.000 --> 53:20.000]  You're going to have to look for whatever section deals with judgments,
[53:20.000 --> 53:25.000]  how they're done, when they're done, by what means notice is given.
[53:25.000 --> 53:29.000]  And then you may have to look for the specific subject matter
[53:29.000 --> 53:32.000]  to which this judgment applies and see if that subject matter
[53:32.000 --> 53:37.000]  has a separate way of doing a judgment in any case.
[53:37.000 --> 53:40.000]  It's research. There is no term.
[53:40.000 --> 53:46.000]  You're going to have to read.
[53:46.000 --> 53:50.000]  And you're going to have to read based upon the subject itself,
[53:50.000 --> 53:53.000]  which is each of the individual charges
[53:53.000 --> 53:57.000]  and whether or not they constitute a similar class of violation
[53:57.000 --> 54:00.000]  like a transportation violation as a whole,
[54:00.000 --> 54:05.000]  a moving violation where the judgment would be the same for any of them
[54:05.000 --> 54:07.000]  and the process would be the same for any of them
[54:07.000 --> 54:11.000]  unless one may have something separate that's required to be done.
[54:11.000 --> 54:12.000]  I've got no way of knowing that.
[54:12.000 --> 54:14.000]  You're going to have to find that out.
[54:14.000 --> 54:17.000]  You're not going to do that with just a term.
[54:17.000 --> 54:20.000]  Okay, and also I'm not sure if I should...
[54:20.000 --> 54:26.000]  I don't know how much weight should carry in legalese,
[54:26.000 --> 54:34.000]  but I was looking at the statute of limitations for this particular matter,
[54:34.000 --> 54:40.000]  and they said that this type of case should...
[54:40.000 --> 54:44.000]  They said that all cases should be resolved in like 84 days,
[54:44.000 --> 54:47.000]  and this has been like almost six to eight months,
[54:47.000 --> 54:51.000]  so I'm not sure exactly if that would carry any weight
[54:51.000 --> 55:00.000]  or any type of legal binding to prohibit him from ruling on this matter again.
[55:00.000 --> 55:03.000]  I'm not sure about that.
[55:03.000 --> 55:08.000]  Okay, say that one more time.
[55:08.000 --> 55:09.000]  What did you say?
[55:09.000 --> 55:13.000]  Say that one more time because I'm not following that exactly.
[55:13.000 --> 55:18.000]  No, the statute of limitations...
[55:18.000 --> 55:22.000]  Well, that's the other thing you need to be checking on.
[55:22.000 --> 55:25.000]  Once they've initiated prosecution on a case like this,
[55:25.000 --> 55:28.000]  how long do they have to complete the prosecution?
[55:28.000 --> 55:31.000]  How long do they have to initiate the prosecution?
[55:31.000 --> 55:33.000]  How is the prosecution initiated?
[55:33.000 --> 55:35.000]  How is it completed?
[55:35.000 --> 55:38.000]  In what length of time must the judgment be done?
[55:38.000 --> 55:43.000]  In what length of time do they violate the right to a speedy trial, et cetera, et cetera?
[55:43.000 --> 55:48.000]  These are the kind of things you need to be looking at.
[55:48.000 --> 55:52.000]  Okay, so in a situation like this,
[55:52.000 --> 56:01.000]  it's basically just to file the appeal and take it to a different court,
[56:01.000 --> 56:07.000]  or would you just basically send out...
[56:07.000 --> 56:10.000]  Because what you were reading in the beginning of your show,
[56:10.000 --> 56:13.000]  it sounds applicable to this matter.
[56:13.000 --> 56:15.000]  No, that's a red light camera ticket.
[56:15.000 --> 56:20.000]  It's a completely different animal.
[56:20.000 --> 56:28.000]  Yeah, but it looks like that if I push the issue about the fraud in this matter,
[56:28.000 --> 56:30.000]  the potential fraud...
[56:30.000 --> 56:35.000]  Until you have researched this and know what fraud has been committed and how,
[56:35.000 --> 56:41.000]  that is not somewhere to be writing something down.
[56:41.000 --> 56:49.000]  Get your facts straight and your points of law in order before you do anything.
[56:49.000 --> 56:57.000]  If you go off half-cocked and you're going to get roundhouse right into the dirt.
[56:57.000 --> 57:04.000]  Okay, so it's probably just to file the appeal and with the time allotted,
[57:04.000 --> 57:06.000]  it's like 21 days.
[57:06.000 --> 57:10.000]  And another thing too, the appeals court.
[57:10.000 --> 57:13.000]  If I go in front of the appeals court,
[57:13.000 --> 57:23.000]  would they have jurisdiction because the judge has never put jurisdiction on a record as I requested.
[57:23.000 --> 57:26.000]  He has a legal...
[57:26.000 --> 57:34.000]  Okay, again, yes, the appeals court will have jurisdiction because it's an appeal.
[57:34.000 --> 57:38.000]  What they would then decide is whether or not they have to overturn the conviction
[57:38.000 --> 57:43.000]  because the original trial court never had it and never put it into the record as required
[57:43.000 --> 57:49.000]  if they determined that it is required in this case.
[57:49.000 --> 57:56.000]  Be very careful about relying on patronet mythology as to what a court is required to put on the record and what it isn't.
[57:56.000 --> 58:03.000]  Yes, jurisdiction in a limited jurisdiction court is required to be proven into the record.
[58:03.000 --> 58:09.000]  How they're required to do that is a separate question though.
[58:09.000 --> 58:16.000]  They would have to tell me about it, right, because I've never been given any verbal or any written...
[58:16.000 --> 58:20.000]  You have a right to a copy of anything that's filed in the case.
[58:20.000 --> 58:26.000]  Usually it is done in writing to establish the jurisdiction of the court.
[58:26.000 --> 58:39.000]  That's why every lawsuit has a paragraph that says this court has jurisdiction under the following provisions of law.
[58:39.000 --> 58:41.000]  Okay, well hang on, I've got a break coming up.
[58:41.000 --> 58:50.000]  Alright folks, Rule of Law Radio, 512-646-1984. I need some callers.
[58:50.000 --> 58:58.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:07.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:18.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:28.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:48.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:41.000]  Markets for the 1st of June, 2015 opened up with gold at $1,189.60 an ounce, silver $16.74 an ounce, Texas crude $6.30 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 223 U.S. currency.
[01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  Today in history, Thursday, June 1, 2000, the Patent Law Treaty or PLT, a multilateral treaty, is signed in Geneva, Switzerland by 53 states and the European Patent Organization.
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  Its aim is to harmonize formal patent procedures like filing dates for patent applications, forms and content on patent applications, and representation.
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  In recent news, on Friday of last week, Ross Ulbrich was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for his role in creating and running Silk Road, a billion-dollar anonymous black market website.
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  Catherine Forrest, the judge in the case, gave Ross a sentence beyond what even the prosecution had requested.
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  The minimum he could have gotten was 20 years. She instead gave him life.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  Ross was also ordered to pay massive fines of over $183 million, what the prosecution had estimated to be the total sales of illegal drugs and counterfeit IDs through the Silk Road at a certain Bitcoin exchange rate over the course of its time online.
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:45.000]  Any revenue from the government's sale of the Bitcoin seized from Silk Road and Ulbrich's laptop will be applied to that debt.
[01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:54.000]  Ross' supporters, family, as well as anonymity and property rights advocates will be pushing for retrial.
[01:01:54.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  ABC News was the first to report on an internal investigation conducted by the Transportation Security Administration's Red Teams, who pose as passengers, which revealed security failures at dozens of the nation's busiest airports.
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  Apparently, these undercover investigators were able to smuggle, mock explosives and ban weapons through checkpoints in a whopping 95 percent of trials, failing 67 out of 70 tests conducted.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:32.000]  Privacy, travel and liberty groups, which have been critical of the TSA DHS screening procedures, have been claiming this for years. Losing privacy and liberty do not equate to gaining safety and security.
[01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:41.000]  The United States Senate yesterday, unable to block parliamentary filibuster maneuvers by Senator Rand Paul, let three controversial provisions of the Patriot Act expire at midnight.
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  The Patriot Act will expire tonight, Rand Paul said, but it will only be temporary. They will ultimately get their way.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:56.000]  Most of our Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors. If you have a product or a service you would like to advertise in the Lowdown, feel free to give us a call at 210-863-5617.
[01:02:56.000 --> 01:03:11.000]  This has been your Lowdown for June 1st, 2013.
[01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:37.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:44.000]  Kev is my only caller at the moment and I need some more. 512-646-1984.
[01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:49.000]  Give us a call and get in line, folks. All right, Kev, please continue.
[01:03:49.000 --> 01:04:08.000]  Yeah, I also, before I get to more of the issue, I also had a standing objection to all of these terms that this opinion includes like vehicle, operator, basically the seven deadly sins.
[01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:13.000]  Any time it came up, I objected to it and the judge gave me a standing objection to it.
[01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:19.000]  But he's basically just using them in here. I'm not sure if that's an issue.
[01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  As long as he recognized your standing objection and you made the objection the first time it was used up until he recognized the standing objection, no, it's not an issue.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:45.000]  Okay. Also, I just wanted to know if the civil infraction, is that a law or is that a, what is that? Is that some type of law or something, Eddie?
[01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:49.000]  Well, it depends on how it's defined and what defined it.
[01:04:49.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  If it's defined by an ordinance and your Constitution there says that only the legislature can make law, then that would mean ordinances are not law. They're ordinances.
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:07.000]  Okay. Yeah, this was done by the Michigan House, the civil infraction.
[01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:22.000]  And it may be a statute and not necessarily a law. The difference between a statute and the law is a statute is a rewrite of the law by some agency or entity that isn't the legislature.
[01:05:22.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  The legislature passed a bill. The bill is the actual law.
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:49.000]  Okay. And a few months back you had something about this Title 47 tie-in to all the driver's license compact. You were saying that you had to do more research on it. What did you find out about that?
[01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:51.000]  Wait, say that one more time.
[01:05:51.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  You were talking about if the states, they're in a compact with the federal government and with Title 47.
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  Title 49.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  No, Title 49. It only deals with commercial applications so the state can't.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  I'm still looking for case law to make that link 100% set. Right now it's a legal theory based upon how the states are able to join a compact in the first place because the federal Constitution says they cannot do so without congressional approval.
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:35.000]  Well, the only way the Congress can approve anything that occurs within the states is through one of the 18 enumerated powers they were given.
[01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  The only one of those powers that is allowed to operate within the territorial boundaries of the states is the Commerce Clause.
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:50.000]  Therefore, any such compact has to have a commercial nexus in order to be valid.
[01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  All I need is to find case law that makes that true.
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:06:58.000]  Okay.
[01:06:58.000 --> 01:07:05.000]  But please, by all means, don't everybody out there wait for me to find it.
[01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  If you can find it faster or you come across it, feel free to send it to me and let me know.
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:12.000]  Thank you.
[01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  How about if it's not dealing with transportation, if it's dealing with something else, some other area of commerce?
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:26.000]  Well, it can't be dealing with anything else because that is the issue within the state that you are dealing with.
[01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:29.000]  Okay.
[01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  Does that sound like you said they had something like a food business or something like that and the federal government was regulating them?
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  That has nothing to do with the license requirement.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:44.000]  Why is it a driver's license compact?
[01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:51.000]  That wouldn't have a dang thing to do with a food business, except unless it's a delivery truck.
[01:07:51.000 --> 01:08:02.000]  I was just saying that if they hide it in through that way and they said, oh, you have to follow our way because you signed this compact to sell meat, you can't do it any other way.
[01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  No.
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  The federal government can't regulate it that way.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  They've never been authorized to regulate it that way.
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:15.000]  The state can't prohibit people from doing any lawful occupation.
[01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  Neither can the federal government.
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  So or any occupation of common right, and that's what that is.
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  So the issue here becomes which one can they regulate, and that's the one that involves use of public property for private gain.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:34.000]  The meat does not qualify for that.
[01:08:34.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  The road does.
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  Okay.
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:39.000]  Okay.
[01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  And Eddie, I called you last week.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  I think it was last week.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  And I told you about the bank, they actually took my money out of my account saying that I owed a tax on it or something.
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:56.000]  So I asked them where they get their legal authority from.
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  So they sent me a warrant, levied it.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  Who levied it?
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:04.000]  Nobody signed this thing.
[01:09:04.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  That is not my question.
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  Who is claiming to have levied it?
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:11.000]  Oh, the Michigan Department of Treasury.
[01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  Okay.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  Then you need to find out what the lawful mechanism is for them to do that and whether or not that piece of paper is required to be signed,
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  who's required to sign it, and what process they're required to go through before it gets signed and after it gets signed and before they take your money
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:33.000]  and after they take your money.
[01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:34.000]  Okay.
[01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  They said that they sent it to me, certified mail.
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  Okay, again, make them prove it.
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:54.000]  Send in whatever constitutes a public information request in Michigan asking for any and all records that prove postal delivery of such documentation to you.
[01:09:54.000 --> 01:09:56.000]  Yes, I've done that already.
[01:09:56.000 --> 01:09:58.000]  And what did you get?
[01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:06.000]  They haven't sent it back yet, but I got my Green Step Act showing that they received it.
[01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:22.000]  Also, I sent a letter to the bank stating that I would – I demanded that they immediately return all my – all the funds that they took out of my account
[01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  because the legal basis for – I wasn't noticed for this debt.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:37.000]  Okay, wait, Kev, Kev, Kev, I don't have time with the other callers I've got to go through this on such a detailed basis.
[01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:46.000]  You need to do your research on what they're required to do and how and take them to task on it.
[01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  Okay.
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:48.000]  Okay?
[01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  I'm sorry, but I just don't have time to go through every potential issue you've got in all these areas.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:54.000]  Okay.
[01:10:54.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  All right, Eddie.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:56.000]  Okay.
[01:10:56.000 --> 01:10:57.000]  All right.
[01:10:57.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  Thank you, Eddie.
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  All right, man.
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:02.000]  Yes.
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  All right.
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:04.000]  Now we're going to go to Mike in Illinois.
[01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  Mike, what do you got?
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:07.000]  Hey, Eddie.
[01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:08.000]  Thanks for taking the call.
[01:11:08.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  Yes.
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  I've got a quick question for you.
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:11.000]  All right.
[01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  So about a week ago, I was pulled over.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:26.000]  The officer said that he cited me swerving over the line and such, and he gave me a – I ended up getting a ticket for a DUI.
[01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  In the course of – he brings me to the jail and, you know, asked me to submit to a breathalyzer.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  And at that point, I told him, you know, I'm not really comfortable doing that at this time, you know, and I kind of felt uncomfortable doing that.
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:51.000]  He said, that's fine, but under Illinois law then, if I refuse, then I get an instant 12-month suspension on the license.
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:59.000]  Afterwards, I was talking with the whole case to somebody, and they referred me to your organization.
[01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  And as I was learning some things, it occurred to me that the 12-month suspension, isn't that a violation of – because in my point of view,
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:18.000]  if they say, hey, would you submit to this, and I refuse at that point, is that not just me standing on my Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate Mike?
[01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:19.000]  No.
[01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:20.000]  See, here's the problem.
[01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  There's a difference between invoking a right and refusing to take a test.
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:27.000]  Okay?
[01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:30.000]  There's a difference, a very big legal difference.
[01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:43.000]  They cannot criminalize the invocation and exercise of a right, but they can criminalize a refusal that is not based upon a right.
[01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  Did you invoke your right to remain silent and your right to assistance of counsel prior to giving consent for the test?
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:56.000]  I suppose not.
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  There you go.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:04.000]  That's the difference between a refusal and the invocation and exercise of a right.
[01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:13.000]  Officer, I am not refusing to take your test. However, I can only do so upon advice of legal counsel.
[01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  Till I have received my right to legal counsel, I invoke my right to remain silent.
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:23.000]  End of discussion.
[01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  That is invoking and demanding a right.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  You follow?
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:32.000]  Okay.
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:34.000]  Yeah, I follow that.
[01:13:34.000 --> 01:13:37.000]  I see a difference there.
[01:13:37.000 --> 01:13:40.000]  All right.
[01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:54.000]  So as a side note then, I was planning on submitting to the court in my hearing a motion to dismiss based on the fact that I don't see that there was really a crime there.
[01:13:54.000 --> 01:14:02.000]  You know, and do you have any advices towards Illinois law particularly?
[01:14:02.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  No, because I'm not well versed in Illinois law.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:14.000]  However, in a DUI, what are the requisites of a DUI charge in Illinois?
[01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:16.000]  What makes you DUI in Illinois?
[01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  You haven't even read the statute yet, have you?
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:21.000]  No, I have not.
[01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:26.000]  Then how do you know what you're actually being charged with and what the state has to prove?
[01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:32.000]  And that way then know what they absolutely cannot prove.
[01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:34.000]  Okay.
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:37.000]  Yeah, I guess that would be a good place to start then.
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:39.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  That would be my recommendation.
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:44.000]  All right.
[01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:45.000]  Thank you for, thanks for taking the call.
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:46.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:14:46.000 --> 01:14:47.000]  No problem.
[01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:49.000]  I appreciate it.
[01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:53.000]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984.
[01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  Now I've got Dan in Arizona.
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:15:00.000]  Dan, I've got two minutes, which is only a minute and a half till break, so start.
[01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:04.000]  And if we don't get finished, I'll take you on the other side.
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:07.000]  Okay, Eddie, thanks.
[01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  Just to tell you my situation, I was driving from, or not driving, excuse me, traveling,
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  from Texas to my home state here of Arizona.
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  And in El Paso, I got a citation for speeding in a child seat, you know, no child.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:28.000]  You were speeding in a child seat?
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:32.000]  How did you fit in it?
[01:15:32.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  I'm sorry, can you say that again?
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:36.000]  You were speeding in a child seat?
[01:15:36.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  How many CC does that have?
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:40.000]  Oh, no, no, I'm sorry.
[01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  There's two charges against me.
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  One is for speeding, and the other one is for not having a child safety seat.
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:51.000]  Did you have a child with you?
[01:15:51.000 --> 01:15:53.000]  Yes, I did.
[01:15:53.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  She was in the back bed of my truck with a camper shell on it.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  Her and Mom were back there.
[01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  Okay, how old is she?
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  She's two years old.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:07.000]  Okay.
[01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:16.000]  So a couple weeks ago I ordered your course, and just by the way, that course is phenomenal.
[01:16:16.000 --> 01:16:20.000]  I mean, I can tell you guys have put many hours into that,
[01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  and I want to thank you guys for putting that together.
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:24.000]  Well, you're welcome.
[01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:32.000]  Yeah, so I'm going through the course, and...
[01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:35.000]  Okay, there's our break music, so hang on, Dan,
[01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:38.000]  and I'll be right back to finish up the question, okay?
[01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  I've got Dan and one unknown caller coming from California,
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  which I'll get to when I'm done with Dan and after this break.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  So I need some more callers.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:57.000]  I've got 45 minutes left in this show, and I don't want to have to just keep talking on my own.
[01:16:57.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  So y'all call in, we'll be right back.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:05.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:15.000]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:19.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular longevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polymer.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods,
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:46.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Visit us at capitalcoin and bullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.000 --> 01:18:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:26.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:37.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor,
[01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Order now.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:37.000]  Hey folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, call at number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:40.000]  We are talking to Dan in Arizona.
[01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:44.000]  All right, Dan, just to recap, you are on your way home from Texas to Arizona.
[01:19:44.000 --> 01:19:45.000]  You got stopped in El Paso.
[01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  You received two citation charges, no car seat, no child seat, and speeding, right?
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:57.000]  Yeah, that's right, the no child seat.
[01:19:57.000 --> 01:20:02.000]  And the initial contact cause was speeding, correct?
[01:20:02.000 --> 01:20:03.000]  Correct, yes.
[01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  Okay. So what's your question?
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  Okay, so in this, you know, I'm trying to build my strategy of what I'm going to do when I go to court or in filing,
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:23.000]  you know, to anticipate what the court is going to do so that I'm prepared to properly respond.
[01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:26.000]  So in that, I have a couple questions for you.
[01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:31.000]  The first one is, and I think I know the answer to it, but I wanted to ask you anyway,
[01:20:31.000 --> 01:20:37.000]  but since I'm in Arizona, it's about, for me from where I am, it's about a six-hour drive to go to, or travel,
[01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  six hours traveling to go to El Paso.
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  And I'm fine with that, to fight this, because I want to fight these people.
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:54.000]  But I wanted to ask you, you know, since I'm filing these paperwork that say, you know, special appearance and things like that,
[01:20:54.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  do I have to show, like it said on the ticket, you know, where I signed within whatever it is, 30 days, do I have to show within that period?
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:09.000]  You do unless you hire an attorney to show for you.
[01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  Okay. All right. Okay. Let's see.
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  So just to tell you some of the paperwork I filed, I filed my special appearance with notice to the Smiths for lack of jurisdiction.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  My next one that I'm working on is my...
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:33.000]  Okay. First off, what type of defense are you raising?
[01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:41.000]  Are you going to fight on merits or are you going to fight on not engaging in transportation?
[01:21:41.000 --> 01:21:48.000]  Well, my basis is I'm not in commercial activity, but right now...
[01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  Okay. That's not what I asked you. I asked you which defense you intend to pursue.
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  Can you explain to me what your first...
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:03.000]  Do you intend to pursue on the merits?
[01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:10.000]  In other words, you're going to argue the elements of each charge and that they can't be proven,
[01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  or are you going to argue not engaged in transportation?
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:20.000]  Not engaged in transportation.
[01:22:20.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  Okay. What did you produce to the cop at the stop?
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  I gave him, because I was in fear...
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  Okay. I'm not asking why you gave it to him. I asked what you gave to him.
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:43.000]  Okay. All right. I gave him a registration and I gave him a license.
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:50.000]  Then you can kiss the not in transportation defense goodbye.
[01:22:50.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  You have no choice but to fight each charge on the merits.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  Okay. Then that is arguing each citation of count one and count two of why that doesn't apply to me. Is that correct?
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:16.000]  No. It's arguing why the state cannot prove all of the elements required to be proven.
[01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  Okay.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  Which you do by cross-examination with the state's witness, the cop.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  Okay. So then in this, are you saying that my notice to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is not going to work?
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  No. It's not going to work, but it's not going to be just because of that.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:46.000]  It's not going to work because they ignore them at this level. They always have.
[01:23:46.000 --> 01:23:55.000]  Okay. What you're doing is filing it for the purpose of making a record for appeal, not to win at trial.
[01:23:55.000 --> 01:23:57.000]  You follow?
[01:23:57.000 --> 01:23:59.000]  Yeah, I do. I follow.
[01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:12.000]  Okay. You cannot under any circumstances go into a trial court in any state for these types of accusations and be expecting to win.
[01:24:12.000 --> 01:24:16.000]  They don't obey the law. They don't follow the rules.
[01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:24.000]  They don't do anything except keep you in the system so they can get your money.
[01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  Right.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:37.000]  So your job is to make a proper appellate record with the proper argument that would allow the appeals court to say this is overturned.
[01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:56.000]  Okay. So in sending in this paper for notice to dismiss, when she, the judge in the J.P. court, when she ignores it or denies it, then I should appeal it to a higher court, correct?
[01:24:56.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  You don't get to appeal it until after trial.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  Okay. Okay. All right.
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  My next question is, and I looked this up, tried to find, but I couldn't really find a definite answer online, and that is videoing the court, you know, taking in my own video camera.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  You cannot record if they know you're recording. You're going to have to find a way to do it secretly and not let anyone know you're doing it.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  It's not illegal to do it, but they like to hide their wrongdoing from the eyes of the public and public scrutiny.
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:58.000]  Okay. Okay. Okay. And my last question, and I ask this one because of all the news stories coming out, you know, that recent one of that homesteading family in Kentucky where CPS came and took their kids,
[01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:14.000]  this officer took down the name and birthdate of my child, and that worries me. So in all this, is it possible that they would have some sort of a recourse or to notify CPS to...
[01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  There is no telling what they can or will do. You're asking me a question I don't have a way of answering. There is always such a possibility the way the government operates today, always.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  Yeah. Okay. Okay. Well, I think that's all the questions I have. I'm going to go forward with this now and file my notice of declination to plea and go forward with it.
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:48.000]  Okay. Good luck.
[01:26:48.000 --> 01:26:49.000]  All right, Eddie.
[01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:55.000]  All right. Keep me posted. And if you have a question, send me an email, but keep it directed at the material.
[01:26:55.000 --> 01:27:02.000]  If you won't help with the actual case, that's a separate issue with a separate fee.
[01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:03.000]  Okay. All right.
[01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  Okay. Got it. Thanks, Eddie.
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  You're welcome.
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  Thanks.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:07.000]  All right. Bye-bye.
[01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  All right. I do not have a name. Wireless caller in California, area code 607. Are you there? Hello? Hello?
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  I don't even have background noise.
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:31.000]  All right. Well, I guess I don't have a wireless caller there.
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  All right, folks. Call in number 512-646-1984. I don't have anybody else up on the line except for this call from California that nobody is speaking on.
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  So that being said, I need somebody else to talk to. In the meantime, I would like very much, if you don't have any other issue, give me a call and see what you thought about the red light camera ticket or letter that I read at the opening of the show or any of the other stuff that you've read lately that I've done up on Facebook or whatever.
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:15.000]  I'd be interested in knowing what you think. If you want to talk about the seminar material and what you think of what you got for the money and how it's helped you or hasn't helped you or whatever, please feel free to do that too.
[01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  Feedback for the people that's purchasing it or want to purchase it would be good to let them know that their money is being well spent or they shouldn't waste their time.
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  Either way, we'd like to hear from you just so we'd know. I really haven't had anybody call in and complain about anything in it yet, so we'll see how that goes.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:52.000]  But in any case, 512-646-1984. I've got two more segments left in the show, and I don't want to have to be out here just talking on the air. I can do it, but you may not enjoy it as much, but I'll see what I can do.
[01:28:52.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  All right. Now, as far as the other things that are going on here in Austin, we still have the Sunday classes. We still need folks to come down to the classes. They're far too small.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:23.000]  It absolutely astounds me that people will not take an interest in their own self-preservation before they run afoul of the transportation code and all the cops wanting their revenue and all this.
[01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:31.000]  They'll only show up in class after they've got a ticket or after they've made a mistake that cost them their case and their money.
[01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:42.000]  It's disheartening for me in a lot of ways, because I know they could have done better if they had just been there before it became a problem.
[01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  Folks, please come down to the classes on Sunday from 2 to 5. It's not but 20 bucks a class after the first class, which is free, so you can understand what you're getting into.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:30:01.000]  All right, y'all hang on. We're going to break, and I'll come back on the other side.
[01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  Passing on knowledge is an age-old tradition, but in our over-regulated society, authorities are threatening to shut down training classes ranging from acting to yoga.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment to tell you how some instructors are fighting back.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:25.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:44.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  Yoga teachers. We think of them as flexible and easygoing, but they recently took bureaucrats to the mat, and I don't mean the yoga mat.
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:58.000]  They marched on the Texas Capitol to oppose the government's interference in their teaching practices, and who could blame them?
[01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:07.000]  Regulators had raided their yoga studios and threatened them with fines unless they submitted to a burdensome certification process and paid up to three grand for the privilege.
[01:31:07.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  Their defiance inspired some rule changes, but Texas is not alone. Even dog training lessons may be subject to regulation where you live.
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  So join me in opposing unreasonable government control over the people who share their knowledge and experience with the rest of us.
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:30.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:38.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders have died. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:32:00.000]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:25.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  With zero complaints, you can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  So if those out of town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  And that's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:04.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:04.000 --> 01:33:13.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  Okay, number 512-646-1984. I'm going to give one more try. Unscreened caller and area code 607. Are you there?
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:34:05.000]  All right, still silence. All right. Unscreened caller, area code 512, last 3960. Are you there?
[01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:07.000]  Yes, I am.
[01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  I can barely hear you.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  I'm sorry. This is Steve. How are you doing, Eddie?
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:15.000]  Better now that I can hear you.
[01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  I'm a big fan. You actually took your glass 10 times last year and I got enough information to learn how to beat my ticket. I got a dismissal.
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:27.000]  Great.
[01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  I tried to set up a peelable error, but I didn't even ask you. I actually brought enough evidence to where the VA didn't even want to say that he just dismissed it or had the judge dismiss it.
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  Thank you very much for that. It blew my mind. Your class was amazing.
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  Well, thank you.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:52.000]  Basically, this time it's called because I missed you getting the red light information. What exactly was the red light information?
[01:34:52.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  Well, it turns out that there is no authority in Chapter 707 of the Transportation Code for any municipality or police agency to issue a citation in relation to a red light camera violation.
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:09.000]  It is absolutely illegal.
[01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  It is illegal to the tune of committing an actual crime under 38.42 Penal Code, which is simulation of legal process.
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:29.000]  So they're actually committing a Class A misdemeanor by issuing that red light camera citation and sending it to you and demanding a payment of money.
[01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  Well, how do you confirm on that?
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:36.000]  That's what the red light camera ticket does or the red light camera letter does.
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  When you send that to them and they then proceed against you, they have now been fully made aware of what they were doing.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  They knew they were doing it anyway. That's a crime.
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:54.000]  Now you can sue them, and they have no immunity for it because they were acting entirely outside of any lawful authority.
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  They cannot claim official immunity. They weren't acting officially.
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:17.000]  They cannot claim any sort of, let's see, immunity, qualified immunity because they were not operating on any statutory basis that allowed them to make a decision one way or the other on how to act, and then they got sued accordingly.
[01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:19.000]  None of that's available to them.
[01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  They're dead in the water.
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  That's the beauty of the new letter.
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:26.000]  It brings all of that out in the open.
[01:36:26.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  That is wonderful.
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:33.000]  I actually got a red light ticket while I was in Houston, and the cop didn't show up, so the judges missed it.
[01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:38.000]  And I thought it was basically because they had no witness that they couldn't actually prosecute you without a witness.
[01:36:38.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  Well, let me ask you this.
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:43.000]  How can the cop testify to what the camera saw and he didn't?
[01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  It's hearsay.
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  He can't do it.
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:59.000]  In order for him to testify to the contents of that red light camera ticket, he has to be able to explain in detail every single part of the process from beginning to end.
[01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:01.000]  How's the camera function?
[01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  Once it collects the information, how does it transmit it from here to there?
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:14.000]  What type of safety mechanisms exist to ensure there was no tampering or falsification of the photograph, the time stamp, or any of that stuff?
[01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:18.000]  He has to be able to answer every single one of those questions.
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:23.000]  If he can't do it, he is testifying to hearsay.
[01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:25.000]  It just sounds like another scam.
[01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  It is a scam.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:27.000]  It's always been a scam.
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:32.000]  From day one, it's been a scam.
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  I don't know.
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:37.000]  All I know is I don't trust him anymore, and you woke me up a long time ago.
[01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  So God bless you, Eddie.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:42.000]  It's just been pretty amazing to see you.
[01:37:42.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  I haven't got a tape recorder right now.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:45.000]  I would have come back to your class by now.
[01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  Well, I appreciate you showing up for when you have, and I appreciate the kudos.
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  It's nice to know that what we're doing is helping folks and working when it needs to work.
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:38:02.000]  Really, what you taught me was spot on, and I tape recorded it all, and I basically memorized most of it.
[01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:08.000]  And I repeated it in court, and it kind of shocked the DA that I knew that much.
[01:38:08.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  You know, he saw me as the pushover, because I filed a whole lot of different movement motions.
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:29.000]  And my judge actually said that for the court to stop accepting my motion, and I, because of what you told me,
[01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:38.000]  recused the judge, I think her name was Weissman, or White, I forget her name.
[01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  You managed to get her recused because she refused to allow you to file pleadings in the case?
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:46.000]  Yeah, and you told me exactly what to do for that, too, so thank you for that as well.
[01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  It's really a lot easier than most people think it is.
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:52.000]  You should fight your ticket no matter what.
[01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:54.000]  Exactly.
[01:38:54.000 --> 01:39:00.000]  The system would go broke overnight if everyone fought every ticket they got.
[01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:02.000]  They couldn't handle the caseload.
[01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  They could not keep this system alive.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:10.000]  We need to, because just last year you told me that I'm not going to ever fight again.
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:13.000]  I'm going to fight no matter what now, from now on.
[01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  Good.
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:22.000]  And when I need you, I'll come back and I will pick your class again and restore all the information in my head, because it was a lot.
[01:39:22.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  And this is a tape recorder, believe me.
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:28.000]  Yeah, don't ever come to my class without something that records.
[01:39:28.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  You're missing out if you do, because I am talking so fast and so much about what to do and how to do it,
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:40.000]  that I can't recall two seconds ago what I said to backtrack and repeat it for you,
[01:39:40.000 --> 01:39:46.000]  because I've already thought five statements ahead of where I'm currently at.
[01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  So it's literally almost impossible for me to back up if you can't tell me where I was.
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:59.000]  Yeah, I got to tell you eloquent in your explanation, and I basically got it all.
[01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:03.000]  I probably should have kept taking your class, but I only took it ten times.
[01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:07.000]  And that was enough, because I was fighting a ticket at the time.
[01:40:07.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  And I had the courage, because of what you taught me, to just fight it, and I actually got a dismissal.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  Now, I'm not going to say that I won, because it's just dismissal, but that's enough.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:27.000]  Well, if you manage to kick a judge off the bench and have that much fun at the same time, you won, believe me.
[01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  Believe me, it was a lot of fun.
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:36.000]  You will never be as satisfied in your life as being able to tell a crooked judge to take a hike.
[01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  Yeah, now I'm afraid if I go back to that court, but they haven't written me another ticket.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:44.000]  I haven't had another ticket now. It's been almost a year and a half.
[01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:51.000]  Yeah, well, see, the thing is, if you ever go back to that court and that same judge is sitting again, you can recuse her automatically.
[01:40:51.000 --> 01:40:53.000]  Wow, I didn't know that.
[01:40:53.000 --> 01:41:01.000]  You can say, excuse me, Judge, I recused you on a prior case because you indicated at that time that you were incapable of being fair and impartial.
[01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:07.000]  I still believe that you are incapable of being fair and impartial, and I want you to recuse yourself.
[01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:16.000]  And if you don't, then I wish for a dismissal or a continuance for the purpose of filing a properly written motion to disqualify.
[01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  Absolutely, I will do that. God, thank you so much.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:22.000]  Hey, I think the judge that I recused was named Stateman or?
[01:41:22.000 --> 01:41:23.000]  Stateman.
[01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:24.000]  Stateman.
[01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  Susan Stateman.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  She was pretty mean to me, man.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:32.000]  She is the ultimate status judge.
[01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  She thinks she can do no wrong, and her crap smells like Sunday biscuits.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  Well, she basically told me I can't file any more motion because I guess I filed too many.
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  I filed, I think I only filed four.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:47.000]  There's no such thing as too many.
[01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:51.000]  What she did was absolutely improper, and she knows it.
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  Yeah, well, I got her.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  I got her to recuse herself or to leave me alone, give me a new judge, and that's all I needed, and I got the dismissal.
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:04.000]  Well, glad to hear it.
[01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:10.000]  The second judge I got, he was not exactly fair either because I brought up several things.
[01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  And he actually introduced them to the VA like, wait a minute, uh-oh, but he still didn't give me a dismissal until I showed the VA enough evidence
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:32.000]  and proved to him that the cop was actually at a ticket trap, and he actually went to the cop and scared and had a little private conversation with him,
[01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:36.000]  and then he came back automatically and dismissed it, or asked the judge to dismiss it.
[01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:38.000]  So it was a lot easier.
[01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:43.000]  Also, I just want to say this to people listening, it is a lot easier than you think,
[01:42:43.000 --> 01:42:50.000]  even though you should be setting up a killable error to go to another jury appeals court.
[01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  But I actually was able to get it on the first try, which you told us, you taught us, oh, it's not going to happen on the first trial.
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  Yeah, I tell you in class, if you win at trial in any way, shape, or form, it will be by sheer dumb luck.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:12.000]  It will not be because of the paperwork because they ignore the paperwork.
[01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  Yeah, no, they really did. They showed me that.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  They don't, you know, they don't really follow the law at all.
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  I mean, amazingly, as much as they act like they do, they really don't follow it in any way.
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  Yeah, they only follow the portions of it that work in their favor while ignoring any portion that prevents them from acting against you.
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  Absolutely right. There was even a judge that was trying to hand me a paper.
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  I can't remember what it was, but it was a paper that was supposed to be presented by a DA, and he tried to act like a DA, and I called him on that.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  Yeah, we'll see. That's how knowing helps you. All right, anything else?
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  Anyway, Eddie, thank you so much. God bless you.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  You're welcome. Thank you. All right, folks, call on number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:07.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  What?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover,
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  and because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:23.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:27.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:33.000]  But I don't know if I'm going to have time to get to everybody now because this is my last segment, and I've got a couple of other callers up on the board.
[01:46:33.000 --> 01:46:35.000]  But let's find out.
[01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:41.000]  All right, on-screen caller, Fort Worth, area code 214, last 3068.
[01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:46.000]  You're on the air.
[01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  Hello, hello.
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:50.000]  Hey, Eddie, how are you doing?
[01:46:50.000 --> 01:46:53.000]  All right, doing all right. Who am I talking to?
[01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:54.000]  This is Jackson.
[01:46:54.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  Hey, Jackson, what can we do for you?
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  Well, thanks for everything you do and taking my call.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:03.000]  And the other day, I was driving in my vehicle.
[01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:05.000]  You were what?
[01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:10.000]  Okay, I just want to make sure I had the right number and was talking to the right person here.
[01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:15.000]  And actually, I've got a layup for you.
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:24.000]  One of the products on the Rule of Law Radio website, and it's in the commercial breaks, is this Michael Mears product.
[01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  And there's two parts to it.
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:37.000]  And I wanted to call and ask if you could kind of give a quick bullet point of Part 1 and Part 2.
[01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:39.000]  I don't know.
[01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:41.000]  I haven't used Michael Mears' stuff.
[01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:44.000]  I haven't even read most of Michael Mears' stuff.
[01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:48.000]  I know it's for debt collection, but I don't do stuff that involves debt.
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:51.000]  I pay for everything I do when I do it.
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:58.000]  So I don't really have a frame of reference to answer your question.
[01:47:58.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  Okay.
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:04.000]  Do you think maybe the Friday Night Show with Randy?
[01:48:04.000 --> 01:48:09.000]  Deborah and Randy on Thursday or Friday, it's possible.
[01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:15.000]  Anyone that's actually used the Michael Mears' stuff, which I know Deborah has, I don't know if Randy has,
[01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:19.000]  either one of them should be able to answer that question for you.
[01:48:19.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  But Deborah is usually on on Thursdays, not on Fridays, if she's on at all.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:27.000]  Okay.
[01:48:27.000 --> 01:48:28.000]  That was my question.
[01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:34.000]  I know there was the Michael Mears' product, and it had a Part 1 and a Part 2,
[01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  and I was just curious what the difference was between them.
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:38.000]  Yeah.
[01:48:38.000 --> 01:48:39.000]  I've never actually used it.
[01:48:39.000 --> 01:48:42.000]  I do not know.
[01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:44.000]  Well, I appreciate it, Andy.
[01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:50.000]  And again, thanks for how you do, and I'm still learning like all your callers and listeners.
[01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  I'm learning a lot about the rights and privileges and traveling and driving or traveling versus driving.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:06.000]  So I really appreciate it, and I'm on behalf of all the people that don't call in and don't say thank you.
[01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  I want you to know I get a lot out of your show, and I share it to the other people.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:16.000]  And like Caller said earlier, God bless you.
[01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  Well, I appreciate that.
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  Thank you very much.
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:19.000]  All right.
[01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:20.000]  All right.
[01:49:20.000 --> 01:49:21.000]  You have a good night.
[01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  Bless you, too.
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  Thanks.
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:24.000]  All right.
[01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:28.000]  Now we're going to go to Jim in area code 620.
[01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:30.000]  Jim, are you there?
[01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  Yes, sir, I am.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:32.000]  All right.
[01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:33.000]  What you got?
[01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:34.000]  Yes, Eddie.
[01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:36.000]  I was wondering if you could speak on quasi-contracts.
[01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:38.000]  Quasi-contracts?
[01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  Yeah.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:43.000]  I'm not sure there can be any such thing as a quasi-contract.
[01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:48.000]  Right, meaning as far as driver licenses are concerned.
[01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:51.000]  They're not quasi-contracts.
[01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:54.000]  They're not contracts at all.
[01:49:54.000 --> 01:49:55.000]  Right.
[01:49:55.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  That's what I mean by quasi.
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:06.000]  They appear to be or purport to be a contract that is created as a presumption in law, but in fact there is no true contract.
[01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:07.000]  Right.
[01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:13.000]  I'm not sure what the proper legal term for them would actually be other than license.
[01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:27.000]  And by definition, a license is the legal authority to do that which would be illegal without the license or permission to do that thing which you do not have an inherent right to do without the permission.
[01:50:27.000 --> 01:50:28.000]  Right.
[01:50:28.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  That's the difference between a license issued for commercial purposes by the state and a license from a private individual to say come on his land and fish in his pond or to, you know, enjoy his stream and fields for picnics.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:53.000]  He will guarantee you license to do that without charging you a fee or issuing you a piece of paper, but he can revoke that privilege any time he wants.
[01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  So that's the difference to me between the two.
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  So as far as a license, the agreement is to abide by the terms associated with the receiving of the license.
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:07.000]  Henceforth quality contract.
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:19.000]  We agree to give you the privilege and you agree to abide by our rules and regulations, but yet there is no set contract in place, no meeting of the minds, no offering substance consideration.
[01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  Right.
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:21.000]  And you know why that is, right?
[01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:26.000]  You know why it is not legitimately a contract.
[01:51:26.000 --> 01:51:29.000]  Well, they can't produce a contract.
[01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:30.000]  No, no, no.
[01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:38.000]  The reason for it is that unlike a contract, a license is revocable at will by the issuer.
[01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  A contract is not.
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:47.000]  There has to be a violation of the contract before either party can invoke a means to terminate it.
[01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:57.000]  On a license, the issuer may cut off the license any time they want, for any reason they want.
[01:51:57.000 --> 01:52:01.000]  And they still use corpus delicti, say, in a criminal case dealing with driver licenses.
[01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:05.000]  You know, some states criminal, some matters civil.
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:14.000]  It still seems like they're operating under the assumption or presumption of contract created by law rather than a contract in fact.
[01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:16.000]  Does that sound right?
[01:52:16.000 --> 01:52:17.000]  Does that make sense?
[01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:21.000]  Well, it would depend upon how you're defining in law.
[01:52:21.000 --> 01:52:25.000]  It would depend upon what parameters you're giving that qualified phrase.
[01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:26.000]  Right.
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:27.000]  The judge.
[01:52:27.000 --> 01:52:32.000]  The judge decides, well, I think I have the elements that comprise the contract.
[01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:44.000]  So this court will operate under the assumption or presumption that a contract exists even though no contract has been entered into the record as evidence to be proven or disproven by either party.
[01:52:44.000 --> 01:52:59.000]  There I would say that we're not talking so much contract as duty or obligation, which we know to be termed are things that are relevant to a contract, but in and of themselves aren't exactly contracts.
[01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:06.000]  The acceptance of the license creates a duty to comply with the rules associated with the license.
[01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  Does there still not have to be damage as a result of the breach?
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  For a license, no.
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:15.000]  For a contract, yes.
[01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:28.000]  There has to be something within the terms of the contract or that is a violation of the term of the contracts that provide the conditions by which one party can seek termination of the contract.
[01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:30.000]  The license doesn't require that.
[01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  The person that issues or entity that issues the license is free to revoke it any time they want.
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  The one exception to that is when the license is one associated to gainful livelihood.
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  What's that mean, Eddie?
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:50.000]  Well, like a truck driver.
[01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  They cannot simply revoke a license belonging to a truck driver or an electrician or a welder because those are vocational licenses.
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:06.000]  You have a right to due process before their revocation because your livelihood depends upon them.
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:08.000]  I happen to be a truck driver.
[01:54:08.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  Could you speak more along the lines as far as how it applies to a truck driver?
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:21.000]  Well, the truck driver has accepted the binding terms of the license to act commercially.
[01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  Part of the acting commercially is that you are using a public resource for a private financial benefit.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:33.000]  You're using the public highway, which doesn't belong to any one individual.
[01:54:33.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  It belongs to all people for their private use and pleasure.
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  The use of it for commercial purposes is an extraordinary use.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:53.000]  That is why the state can license it because that extraordinary use puts extra wear and tear that the public would have to foot the bill for
[01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:58.000]  while the guy that's doing the tearing up is actually making a profit from it.
[01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  So if I perform a California stop or rolling stop at a stop sign or I'm not wearing my seat belt or any other little infraction like that that does not cause any actual harm to anyone else's right.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:12.000]  You're still in violation of the terms of the license.
[01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:14.000]  Sounds like a contract.
[01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:22.000]  In a manner of speaking, yes, but again, that's the difference between a contract and a binding duty.
[01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:23.000]  Okay.
[01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:30.000]  You do have binding duties under a contract, but a contract requires how many signatures?
[01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:31.000]  At least two.
[01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:32.000]  At least two.
[01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:36.000]  How many are on your license or the application for your license?
[01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:37.000]  Exactly.
[01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:38.000]  Only one.
[01:55:38.000 --> 01:55:39.000]  Exactly.
[01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:52.000]  So you are acting under the binding duties associated with the privilege, not with the application granting the privilege.
[01:55:52.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  Understood.
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:55:55.000]  Yes, in total agreement.
[01:55:55.000 --> 01:56:03.000]  But still, under the common law corpus delicti rule, doesn't some party have to claim damage of some kind?
[01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  For it to be a criminal act, yes.
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  If they were doing this all through a civil process or in the realm where it actually belongs, 100% administrative process,
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:27.000]  then a corpus delicti would not be required and the public would be safe from incursion and revenue generation on this scheme
[01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:37.000]  because they are not required to seek out an application in order to bind themselves to the duty associated with the privilege that you are exercising
[01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:41.000]  because what they're exercising is a right, not a privilege.
[01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  Okay.
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:43.000]  How about this?
[01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:51.000]  But since courts are limited to just physical cases or controversies, how is it that any court can have jurisdiction over a matter when there is no actual damaged party that appears in court?
[01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:58.000]  The controversy is the violation of the associated rules of the privilege.
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:06.000]  You can't claim the benefit of a privilege and then claim not being bound by the terms of the privilege.
[01:57:06.000 --> 01:57:11.000]  I argue that because I wasn't wearing a seatbelt, it didn't cause anybody else any harm.
[01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  It was not going to cause anyone else any harm, obviously, out of common sense, I guess, as best I could argue.
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:23.000]  Then maybe the legislature is overstepping their bounds by sticking their nose where it doesn't belong.
[01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  Question.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:28.000]  Do you have the right to contract at will?
[01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:29.000]  Yes.
[01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:30.000]  Okay.
[01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:41.000]  Do you have the right to enter into any duty and obligation with another person with or without a written contract at will?
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:47.000]  No, because the duty or obligation would apply no contract as necessary. Duty of care.
[01:57:47.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  No, that's not necessarily true.
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:58:02.000]  Do you have free will to engage in binding yourself to another person or entity to perform a legal duty?
[01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:05.000]  I would have to answer yes.
[01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:13.000]  Okay. That's what you did. That's the difference between the contract and the license status.
[01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  That's why you can't make the argument of harm.
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:22.000]  Harm was not one of the requisites that were presented to you to get the license and to exercise the privilege.
[01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  Only the violation was. That's what they're after.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  All right, Jim, sorry. I'm out of time, man, but thanks for calling in and asking the questions.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  Thank you very much.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  Well, folks, this has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host Eddie Craig.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  I want to thank all the callers for calling in and for all the thank yous and blessings from everyone out there.
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Y'all have a great week, good night, and God bless. We'll see you next Monday.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:05.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:05.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:12.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:12.000 --> 01:59:21.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:28.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps,
[01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:11.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. Logosradionetwork.com.