[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates, online
[00:08.000 --> 00:09.000]  at thelibertybeat.com.
[00:09.000 --> 00:13.880]  I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, March 16, 2015.
[00:13.880 --> 00:22.680]  Gold is trading at $1,159, silver at $15.67, and bitcoin is trading around $290.59.
[00:22.680 --> 00:28.000]  The Liberty Beat is brought to you by Coinarch, offering innovative online trading solutions
[00:28.000 --> 00:29.000]  for bitcoin.
[00:29.000 --> 00:35.080]  Visit coinarch.com and sign up using coupon code MAX and get free brokerage for the first
[00:35.080 --> 00:36.080]  seven days.
[00:36.080 --> 00:39.440]  It only takes $10 to start an account.
[00:39.440 --> 00:41.680]  That's coinarch.com.
[00:41.680 --> 00:46.320]  In the news, following the decision to delay a planned bullet ban, President Obama's head
[00:46.320 --> 00:49.000]  remains committed to gun regulation.
[00:49.000 --> 00:53.360]  White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest stated that Obama wants to establish common sense
[00:53.360 --> 00:56.560]  rules that prevent criminals from getting weapons.
[00:56.560 --> 01:03.340]  The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives delayed a ban on 5.56mm M855 Green
[01:03.340 --> 01:10.080]  Tip bullets after public response was overwhelmingly against the measure.
[01:10.080 --> 01:15.200]  A Los Angeles police officer is missing, likely on the run, after being named as a person
[01:15.200 --> 01:19.360]  of interest in the shooting death of a 23-year-old man early Friday.
[01:19.360 --> 01:24.200]  Investigators found the vehicle belonging to 27-year-old Henry Sullis not far from the
[01:24.200 --> 01:27.760]  scene of where Salome Rodriguez Jr. was found shot to death.
[01:27.760 --> 01:32.480]  It's alleged that the two men were involved in a fight that escalated to the fatal shooting.
[01:32.480 --> 01:39.800]  Sullis fell to report to work Saturday, and the search continues for his whereabouts.
[01:39.800 --> 01:45.080]  A George Washington University Research Institute has filed a lawsuit to force the release of
[01:45.080 --> 01:49.800]  transcripts of Henry Kissinger's phone calls during his time as Secretary of State in the
[01:49.800 --> 01:51.240]  1970s.
[01:51.240 --> 01:56.120]  The National Security Archive said the lawsuit was in response to unnecessary delays from
[01:56.120 --> 01:57.600]  the State Department.
[01:57.600 --> 02:03.320]  The Archive is attempting to get the last 700 transcripts of Kissinger's phone conversations.
[02:03.320 --> 02:07.640]  Researchers are seeking new information regarding Kissinger's role in U.S. relations with China,
[02:07.640 --> 02:09.640]  snipers and others.
[02:09.640 --> 02:15.840]  Today's broadcast of The Liberty Beat is sponsored by Brave New Books, your source for One World
[02:15.840 --> 02:21.880]  Way, Tangy Tangerine and Clearly Filtered Fluoride Filters, located in Austin, Texas
[02:21.880 --> 02:27.280]  at 1904 Guadalupe Street or online at bravenewbookstore.com.
[02:27.280 --> 02:31.600]  Looking to promote your business or cause to tens of thousands of loyal listeners?
[02:31.600 --> 02:36.600]  Well, for a limited time only, The Liberty Beat is offering you the chance to say big
[02:36.600 --> 02:38.120]  while spreading your message.
[02:38.120 --> 02:44.000]  It's simple, just sign up for three months of advertising and get your fourth month free.
[02:44.000 --> 02:46.140]  Don't miss out on this unique opportunity.
[02:46.140 --> 02:51.320]  Just visit thelibertybeat.com slash advertise and use coupon code GCN in the describe your
[02:51.320 --> 02:52.320]  company section.
[02:52.320 --> 02:57.120]  This is The Liberty Beat for Monday, March 16, 2015.
[02:57.120 --> 03:14.400]  Check out the website at thelibertybeat.com.
[03:14.400 --> 03:30.920]  The Liberty Beat is a production of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of
[03:30.920 --> 03:41.920]  Labor, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department
[03:41.920 --> 04:04.920]  of State, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department
[04:04.920 --> 04:27.880]  of State, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department
[04:27.880 --> 04:34.780]  of State, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department
[04:34.780 --> 04:42.380]  We are rolling right along and about to come up on the end of the first of four quarters
[04:42.380 --> 04:43.380]  here.
[04:43.380 --> 04:45.740]  Now, I've got some things I want to go over tonight.
[04:45.740 --> 04:50.460]  I'm getting a lot of email questions, a lot of class questions, a lot of phone calls,
[04:50.460 --> 04:56.660]  all going back toward one particular subject that I've covered several times and have tried
[04:56.660 --> 05:00.140]  to cover in enough detail that it would matter.
[05:00.140 --> 05:06.060]  And it's also currently the chapter that I have been working so hard to get lined out
[05:06.060 --> 05:11.540]  and full of everything you need to know in the new book.
[05:11.540 --> 05:16.120]  But I'm going to go over it again tonight, and it has to do with ordinances.
[05:16.120 --> 05:20.860]  But before we get that far, there is something new in the medical field, a report that I
[05:20.860 --> 05:24.180]  just heard about that everyone out there needs to know.
[05:24.180 --> 05:30.220]  And it's a study that found out that women who carry a little extra weight tend to live
[05:30.220 --> 05:33.900]  longer than the men and husbands that mention it.
[05:33.900 --> 05:35.900]  But just so you know that.
[05:35.900 --> 05:40.320]  Now, the thing on ordinances is this.
[05:40.320 --> 05:45.980]  First off, you have to understand what the Texas Constitution contains as to who has
[05:45.980 --> 05:50.780]  the power to make law and how they got that power.
[05:50.780 --> 05:57.860]  That power was given by we the people, though not us as these specific people.
[05:57.860 --> 06:05.900]  But allegedly and subsequently is given us the credit of being we the people that delegated
[06:05.900 --> 06:13.980]  this power to a bunch of idiots that get paid nothing, which even in their case is too much
[06:13.980 --> 06:16.860]  to do the job they aren't doing.
[06:16.860 --> 06:22.460]  So just so you know exactly where this is found, it is in Article 3, Section 1 of the
[06:22.460 --> 06:23.460]  Texas Constitution.
[06:23.460 --> 06:28.400]  I'm going to read that to you specifically, very, very short, very, very simple.
[06:28.400 --> 06:33.740]  No judicial interpretation of these words is required whatsoever.
[06:33.740 --> 06:42.780]  Senate and House of Representatives, the legislative power of this state shall be vested in a Senate
[06:42.780 --> 06:50.340]  and House of Representatives, which together shall be styled the legislature of the state
[06:50.340 --> 06:57.220]  of Texas, end of delegation of lawmaking authority.
[06:57.220 --> 06:58.220]  That's it.
[06:58.220 --> 07:01.780]  There is no more.
[07:01.780 --> 07:08.460]  Everything else in Article 3 is about how the legislature is required to exercise this
[07:08.460 --> 07:13.340]  specific power.
[07:13.340 --> 07:18.140]  That's what Article 3 is, the legislative article of the Texas Constitution.
[07:18.140 --> 07:25.460]  And this is the very first section in Article 3, which says where their authority comes
[07:25.460 --> 07:26.460]  from.
[07:26.460 --> 07:31.100]  And that, ladies and gentlemen, is you and I.
[07:31.100 --> 07:35.780]  And if you go back to the Bill of Rights in the Texas Constitution, it says very clearly
[07:35.780 --> 07:39.260]  that all political power is inherent in the people.
[07:39.260 --> 07:42.740]  Well, lawmaking is a political power.
[07:42.740 --> 07:46.140]  We delegated it to them.
[07:46.140 --> 07:49.460]  Now you understand what the delegate means.
[07:49.460 --> 07:56.700]  If we have the power to delegate it, we have the power to take it back.
[07:56.700 --> 08:02.500]  And you know why we have full constitutional authority and approval to do exactly that?
[08:02.500 --> 08:07.580]  Well, that would be another little provision of the Texas Constitution that we all need
[08:07.580 --> 08:10.500]  to be well aware of there in the Bill of Rights.
[08:10.500 --> 08:15.860]  And if the Internet gets a tad bit faster here, I'll tell you exactly what that is.
[08:15.860 --> 08:17.900]  Okay?
[08:17.900 --> 08:19.660]  Let's see right here.
[08:19.660 --> 08:25.220]  It is Section 2, inherent political power, Republican form of government.
[08:25.220 --> 08:27.780]  Listen carefully.
[08:27.780 --> 08:35.380]  All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their
[08:35.380 --> 08:41.860]  authority and instituted for their benefit.
[08:41.860 --> 08:48.980]  The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to a preservation of a Republican form of
[08:48.980 --> 08:50.660]  government.
[08:50.660 --> 09:00.340]  And subject to this limitation only, they, meaning once again the people, you and I have
[09:00.340 --> 09:09.740]  at all times the inalienable right, not consent, not might have it.
[09:09.740 --> 09:19.620]  It is an inalienable right to alter, reform, or abolish their government.
[09:19.620 --> 09:20.620]  Whose government?
[09:20.620 --> 09:21.620]  Their government.
[09:21.620 --> 09:23.260]  Our government.
[09:23.260 --> 09:27.900]  In such manner as they may think expedient.
[09:27.900 --> 09:36.860]  Now, in such manner is wide open, people, as to what power we hold to get rid of these
[09:36.860 --> 09:37.980]  people.
[09:37.980 --> 09:41.580]  They say Texas does not have any recalls in the Constitution.
[09:41.580 --> 09:49.220]  I say they don't understand Article 1, Section 2, which says, in such manner as we the people
[09:49.220 --> 09:52.180]  think expedient.
[09:52.180 --> 09:58.540]  If we think recall is expedient, we do it.
[09:58.540 --> 10:03.180]  If we think overturning them and just kicking them out of office is the way to do it, we
[10:03.180 --> 10:04.860]  do it.
[10:04.860 --> 10:06.100]  It's our call.
[10:06.100 --> 10:11.020]  It is not theirs.
[10:11.020 --> 10:14.420]  The Texas Constitution empowered us and limited them.
[10:14.420 --> 10:16.480]  I don't care what they want you to believe.
[10:16.480 --> 10:21.900]  The words are very, very plain.
[10:21.900 --> 10:28.420]  In the manner we think expedient, we the people.
[10:28.420 --> 10:37.020]  We have all the authority to delegate or take away the lawmaking power of the legislature.
[10:37.020 --> 10:43.240]  We have the power and authority to get rid of government in any stage or any department
[10:43.240 --> 10:46.940]  or in its entirety, if that's what we want.
[10:46.940 --> 10:52.900]  Now, notice there's nothing in Section 2 that says that there has to be a certain number
[10:52.900 --> 10:54.260]  of us that want it.
[10:54.260 --> 10:57.220]  There has to be a certain number of us to vote on it.
[10:57.220 --> 11:02.580]  Doesn't say anything like that, and it couldn't if it wanted to, because the Constitution
[11:02.580 --> 11:09.280]  is not designed to limit the people in any way, and it can't.
[11:09.280 --> 11:16.540]  But once again, what it does show us is something else, very, very clear, that we cannot delegate
[11:16.540 --> 11:22.940]  or give away to any one of our public servants a power that we ourselves do not possess as
[11:22.940 --> 11:25.080]  individuals.
[11:25.080 --> 11:27.160]  We can't do that.
[11:27.160 --> 11:30.680]  We can't give away what isn't ours, okay?
[11:30.680 --> 11:32.180]  So understand that.
[11:32.180 --> 11:40.780]  Now, going a little further into this, since we gave all the lawmaking power to the legislature
[11:40.780 --> 11:51.380]  and no one else, where then are these corporations that we call municipalities and counties getting
[11:51.380 --> 12:00.020]  the idea that they have any such power of their own or in addition to the power granted
[12:00.020 --> 12:02.580]  the legislature by us?
[12:02.580 --> 12:04.820]  Because we certainly didn't give it to them.
[12:04.820 --> 12:09.700]  Nowhere in the Texas Constitution is there a delegation of lawmaking authority to a county
[12:09.700 --> 12:12.100]  or a municipality.
[12:12.100 --> 12:18.020]  In fact, if you look up the word ordinance or ordinances in the Texas Constitution, they
[12:18.020 --> 12:28.900]  appear exactly one time each, and they both appear in Article 11, which deals with municipalities.
[12:28.900 --> 12:33.460]  And any of that appear in the article dealing with counties.
[12:33.460 --> 12:39.100]  Plus you have Article 3, Section 56, which specifically prohibits the legislature from
[12:39.100 --> 12:46.420]  doing any form of local legislation in the areas specifically stated there.
[12:46.420 --> 12:55.140]  Now, folks, if we prohibit the legislature from local legislation, how did these local
[12:55.140 --> 13:01.900]  entities claim they could have a power that we specifically forbade the power above them?
[13:01.900 --> 13:07.300]  Doesn't make any sense to me, but it sure seems to make sense to these corporate attorneys
[13:07.300 --> 13:12.740]  who want that power to do what they do, even though we didn't give it to them.
[13:12.740 --> 13:15.300]  You know what that's called?
[13:15.300 --> 13:17.580]  Usurpation of power.
[13:17.580 --> 13:18.620]  They usurped it.
[13:18.620 --> 13:19.740]  They took it.
[13:19.740 --> 13:21.260]  They weren't given it.
[13:21.260 --> 13:28.940]  They surreptitiously took it from you and I and are exercising it to our detriment,
[13:28.940 --> 13:30.620]  not our benefit.
[13:30.620 --> 13:34.100]  It's entirely to their benefit, not ours.
[13:34.100 --> 13:37.740]  If you don't believe that, take a look around.
[13:37.740 --> 13:40.300]  Watch what they do and how they do it.
[13:40.300 --> 13:44.020]  You haven't had a code enforcement officer come talk to you because your grass is four
[13:44.020 --> 13:47.020]  inches instead of the two and a half they demand?
[13:47.020 --> 13:49.860]  Who's being harmed here?
[13:49.860 --> 13:52.580]  What right do they have to tell you how high you can have your grass?
[13:52.580 --> 13:55.020]  How many trees you can have on your property?
[13:55.020 --> 13:58.980]  What kind of trees you can have on your property, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[13:58.980 --> 14:01.380]  It goes on and on and on.
[14:01.380 --> 14:07.260]  But they make up rules and regulations and call it law when it isn't.
[14:07.260 --> 14:13.340]  But let me tell you how they are operating under the belief they have it.
[14:13.340 --> 14:19.540]  And I'm going to tell you that it's because your legislature has committed sedition in
[14:19.540 --> 14:22.360]  its very own statutes.
[14:22.360 --> 14:25.500]  And here's how they did it.
[14:25.500 --> 14:33.980]  If you do a search for the phrase law means on the Texas legislative website, you will
[14:33.980 --> 14:38.820]  get 17 hits.
[14:38.820 --> 14:48.020]  If you do a search for law includes across all the codes, you will get two hits.
[14:48.020 --> 14:54.260]  Now none of the definitions associated with law includes has anything to do with the discussion
[14:54.260 --> 14:56.620]  of ordinances.
[14:56.620 --> 15:07.440]  And out of the 17 under law means seven of those 17 are specific to the use and application
[15:07.440 --> 15:10.060]  of ordinances.
[15:10.060 --> 15:16.840]  And what I'm going to do first is I'm going to show you the seven places where the legislature
[15:16.840 --> 15:23.980]  has committed treason and sedition against the Texas Constitution by trying to do an
[15:23.980 --> 15:31.180]  end run around all of Article 3, Sections 29 through 40 on how laws in Texas are to
[15:31.180 --> 15:35.160]  be made and who they are to be made by.
[15:35.160 --> 15:39.160]  So listen real close here.
[15:39.160 --> 15:46.100]  If you go down and you take a look at these sections in these codes, you will find each
[15:46.100 --> 15:48.380]  of these definitions.
[15:48.380 --> 15:53.320]  The first of the seven that is dealing with ordinances can be found in the election code
[15:53.320 --> 15:59.660]  and it is Section 1.005 sub item 10.
[15:59.660 --> 16:03.100]  That definition is written thusly.
[16:03.100 --> 16:14.380]  Law means a constitution, statute, city charter, or city ordinance.
[16:14.380 --> 16:15.480]  Got that?
[16:15.480 --> 16:20.660]  They have made a city charter even though the legislature does not create that charter.
[16:20.660 --> 16:22.660]  It does not vote on that charter.
[16:22.660 --> 16:28.300]  It does not do any of the requirements of Article 3, Section 29 through 40 in regard
[16:28.300 --> 16:29.820]  to that charter.
[16:29.820 --> 16:37.740]  And yet by a definition in a statute, they're trying to say that the charter is state law.
[16:37.740 --> 16:42.940]  And they say the same thing about that city ordinance being state law in exactly the same
[16:42.940 --> 16:46.780]  way with exactly the same non-authority.
[16:46.780 --> 16:49.980]  All right, folks, y'all hang on.
[16:49.980 --> 16:53.260]  This is going to take a little while, but I promise it will be worth it in the end.
[16:53.260 --> 16:54.260]  So y'all hold on.
[16:54.260 --> 16:57.620]  Callers, y'all just hold on the board because I'm going to get to you.
[16:57.620 --> 17:00.620]  I don't know when.
[17:00.620 --> 17:05.300]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[17:05.300 --> 17:06.740]  of nutrition.
[17:06.740 --> 17:11.460]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.460 --> 17:17.180]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.180 --> 17:23.460]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can
[17:23.460 --> 17:25.940]  provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.940 --> 17:30.580]  Logos Serial Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[17:30.580 --> 17:31.700]  we reject.
[17:31.700 --> 17:36.940]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[17:36.940 --> 17:39.740]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.740 --> 17:46.180]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[17:46.180 --> 17:47.180]  quality radio.
[17:47.180 --> 17:51.700]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.700 --> 17:57.340]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[17:57.340 --> 17:59.300]  increase your income.
[17:59.300 --> 18:00.660]  Order now.
[18:00.660 --> 18:05.340]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.340 --> 18:09.460]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.460 --> 18:13.740]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.740 --> 18:14.740]  can win too.
[18:14.740 --> 18:19.660]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.660 --> 18:25.460]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.460 --> 18:29.980]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[18:29.980 --> 18:34.180]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.180 --> 18:39.300]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.300 --> 18:41.100]  Additional consultation is available as well.
[18:41.100 --> 18:47.060]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[18:47.060 --> 18:49.940]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.940 --> 18:58.940]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[18:58.940 --> 18:59.940]  collectors now.
[18:59.940 --> 19:10.260]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:10.260 --> 19:30.660]  Thank you very much for listening to the Logos Radio Network, the Logos RadioNetwork.com.
[19:30.660 --> 19:55.660]  Thank you very much for listening to the Logos Radio Network, the Logos RadioNetwork.com.
[19:55.660 --> 20:07.820]  All right, folks.
[20:07.820 --> 20:08.820]  We are back.
[20:08.820 --> 20:10.300]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[20:10.300 --> 20:11.300]  All right.
[20:11.300 --> 20:18.100]  Let's continue this little study on here, and let's see what this is going to tell us
[20:18.100 --> 20:19.100]  when we're all done.
[20:19.100 --> 20:20.740]  And trust me, you're not going to like it.
[20:20.740 --> 20:25.140]  I don't like it, and I'm unfortunate enough to have to be the one that finds all this
[20:25.140 --> 20:31.140]  stuff and then starts asking these questions, and sometimes I just feel like I'm out here
[20:31.140 --> 20:34.740]  peeing into the wind, so to speak, you know, the things you're not supposed to do off the
[20:34.740 --> 20:36.740]  edge of a ship, but still.
[20:36.740 --> 20:37.740]  All right.
[20:37.740 --> 20:44.820]  Anyway, 1.005 sub-item 10 contains the definition law and says that a city charter and a city
[20:44.820 --> 20:48.420]  ordinance are part of the law of this state.
[20:48.420 --> 20:57.660]  Remember, nothing in that city charter or city ordinance was created under the provisions
[20:57.660 --> 21:02.700]  of Article 3, Sections 29 through 39, which we will get to here after I get through with
[21:02.700 --> 21:04.460]  these seven things.
[21:04.460 --> 21:12.940]  The second one is in the government code, Section 554.001, sub-item 1, and I'm also
[21:12.940 --> 21:19.840]  going to read sub-item 2 because it pertains to part of the definition of sub-item 1.
[21:19.840 --> 21:29.820]  Sub-item 1 reads, law means A, a state or federal statute, B, an ordinance of a local
[21:29.820 --> 21:38.380]  governmental entity, or C, a rule adopted under a statute or ordinance.
[21:38.380 --> 21:42.900]  Now notice B, B says a local governmental entity.
[21:42.900 --> 21:46.700]  Well, that's what definition 2 is, is what a local government entity is.
[21:46.700 --> 21:56.700]  But also pay close attention to C. C says a rule adopted under a statute or ordinance.
[21:56.700 --> 22:05.100]  A rule can be from anybody, not just the legislature.
[22:05.100 --> 22:08.840]  Let me show you what they did with number 2 here.
[22:08.840 --> 22:16.380]  Number 2, local governmental entity means a political subdivision of the state, including
[22:16.380 --> 22:25.700]  A, county, B, municipality, C, public school district, or D, special purpose district or
[22:25.700 --> 22:26.700]  authority.
[22:26.700 --> 22:28.880]  And do you get this?
[22:28.880 --> 22:35.500]  The legislature, who was delegated lawmaking power, and only the legislature who was delegated
[22:35.500 --> 22:42.700]  lawmaking power, and who the courts in Texas have ruled repeatedly, cannot delegate that
[22:42.700 --> 22:51.100]  lawmaking power, has now created a second definition that is bequeathing the ability
[22:51.100 --> 22:59.260]  of other entities to create rules, regulations, and ordinances, and the legislature attempt
[22:59.260 --> 23:05.580]  to roll them into state law as if they are binding upon the public in the same manner.
[23:05.580 --> 23:08.540]  You got that?
[23:08.540 --> 23:11.540]  What is not unconstitutional about that?
[23:11.540 --> 23:15.880]  Oh, but wait, there's more.
[23:15.880 --> 23:22.980]  The next one is in the local government code, 361.021.
[23:22.980 --> 23:32.180]  In this subchapter, law means a state statute, a written opinion of a court of record, a
[23:32.180 --> 23:40.580]  municipal ordinance, an order of the commissioner's court of a county, or a rule adopted under
[23:40.580 --> 23:43.180]  a statute.
[23:43.180 --> 23:50.180]  Now this, folks, is where the term case law comes from.
[23:50.180 --> 23:56.360]  The courts believe that the opinion of the courts is itself the law.
[23:56.360 --> 24:00.260]  This definition appears to be trying to say that is true.
[24:00.260 --> 24:09.220]  But again, does the writing and publishing of that court opinion comply in any way with
[24:09.220 --> 24:17.980]  the people's decree under Article 3, Sections 29 through 40, as to how binding law on the
[24:17.980 --> 24:22.820]  public is created in Texas?
[24:22.820 --> 24:24.940]  Or any of the other things that are listed here?
[24:24.940 --> 24:31.300]  I'm going to stand right up in anyone's face and say not only no, but hell no, it does
[24:31.300 --> 24:34.420]  not.
[24:34.420 --> 24:38.180]  You know, my biggest problem, as I've said before, was stare decisis, which is what they
[24:38.180 --> 24:46.020]  call the controlling opinion on a settled matter of law, is that everyone becomes totally
[24:46.020 --> 24:55.700]  dependent on the opinion, even if the laws upon which that opinion was based have changed.
[24:55.700 --> 25:02.420]  No one goes back and reads any changes that have occurred in the law to see if the opinion
[25:02.420 --> 25:05.100]  itself is still valid.
[25:05.100 --> 25:07.580]  No one does that.
[25:07.580 --> 25:15.620]  Disparte Greenwood, written in 1956, absolutely in violation of the Texas Code of Criminal
[25:15.620 --> 25:22.600]  Procedure because it was based upon a statutory section that was repealed.
[25:22.600 --> 25:28.060]  Not to mention it's in violation of the Texas Constitution in numerous areas, but the courts
[25:28.060 --> 25:30.540]  are all upholding as if it's valid.
[25:30.540 --> 25:33.860]  And I can prove it isn't.
[25:33.860 --> 25:39.740]  Because the statutes themselves, as well as the Constitution, says it isn't, yet they
[25:39.740 --> 25:43.940]  keep reading the opinion as if it's valid.
[25:43.940 --> 25:47.900]  That's just one of the many problems with the current justice system we have.
[25:47.900 --> 25:57.940]  All right, next provision here is in the penal code, 1.07 sub item 30.
[25:57.940 --> 26:05.100]  Law means the Constitution or a statute of this state or of the United States.
[26:05.100 --> 26:12.420]  A written opinion of a court of record, a municipal ordinance, an order of a county
[26:12.420 --> 26:21.700]  commissioner's court, or a rule authorized by and lawfully adopted under a statute.
[26:21.700 --> 26:31.780]  The next one is in the property code, section 111.004 sub item 24.
[26:31.780 --> 26:39.540]  Environmental law means any federal, state, or local law, rule, regulation, or ordinance
[26:39.540 --> 26:43.740]  relating to protection of the environment.
[26:43.740 --> 26:46.620]  The last two are both in the transportation code.
[26:46.620 --> 26:51.260]  One is in section 702.001.
[26:51.260 --> 26:59.340]  Public law means a statute or ordinance, a violation of which is a misdemeanor punishable
[26:59.340 --> 27:08.340]  by a fine not to exceed $200 that regulates on a street, road, or highway of this state,
[27:08.340 --> 27:16.060]  A, the conduct or condition of a person while operating a motor vehicle, or B, the condition
[27:16.060 --> 27:19.380]  of a motor vehicle being operated.
[27:19.380 --> 27:26.820]  Now notice that this says is a fine not to exceed $200, okay?
[27:26.820 --> 27:32.300]  Yet I can point to several ordinances here in Austin dealing with traffic where Austin
[27:32.300 --> 27:36.260]  is attempting to charge far more than $200.
[27:36.260 --> 27:42.980]  This new cell phone ordinance, for instance, that they put under Title 12 of their code,
[27:42.980 --> 27:49.220]  which says it only applies to government-owned and operated vehicles, but they're applying
[27:49.220 --> 27:52.220]  it to the general public, which they can't do.
[27:52.220 --> 27:53.620]  It's not a law.
[27:53.620 --> 27:58.900]  And even if it were considered valid law, this definition says it isn't because the
[27:58.900 --> 28:02.620]  fine associated with it is not under $200.
[28:02.620 --> 28:04.220]  It's in excess of that.
[28:04.220 --> 28:09.940]  Therefore, the ordinance is not a valid traffic law, got it?
[28:09.940 --> 28:14.660]  There are so many ways this stuff is wrong, it's not even funny.
[28:14.660 --> 28:21.340]  The other one is in 706.001, sub-item nine of the transportation code, and it's the last
[28:21.340 --> 28:23.380]  one.
[28:23.380 --> 28:29.300]  Traffic law means a statute or ordinance, a violation of which is a misdemeanor punishable
[28:29.300 --> 28:37.780]  by a fine in an amount not to exceed $1,000, that A, regulates an operator's conduct or
[28:37.780 --> 28:44.780]  condition while operating a motor vehicle on a highway or street or in a public place.
[28:44.780 --> 28:50.220]  B, regulates the condition of a motor vehicle while it is being operated on a highway or
[28:50.220 --> 28:51.220]  street.
[28:51.220 --> 28:57.220]  C, relates to the driver's license status of an operator while operating a motor vehicle
[28:57.220 --> 28:59.900]  on a highway or a street.
[28:59.900 --> 29:05.700]  D, relates to the registration status of a motor vehicle while it is being operated on
[29:05.700 --> 29:09.260]  a highway or street, okay?
[29:09.260 --> 29:12.940]  That's what's in that definition of traffic law.
[29:12.940 --> 29:19.820]  Now, think about how ordinances are created.
[29:19.820 --> 29:28.660]  Ordinances are things put together by the county commissioners or the city councilmen,
[29:28.660 --> 29:35.460]  input with other offices and officers, and possibly even involving the agency in which
[29:35.460 --> 29:42.340]  it's supposed to operate as far as its construction, submission, and its carrying through to approval,
[29:42.340 --> 29:44.980]  which is done entirely by the commissioners.
[29:44.980 --> 29:47.180]  We'll pick this up on the other side.
[29:47.180 --> 29:50.780]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the Monday night traffic show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[29:50.780 --> 29:51.780]  Y'all hang in there, folks.
[29:51.780 --> 29:56.380]  We'll be right back to carry on.
[29:56.380 --> 30:05.140]  One South Florida man got more than an eyeful at a local strip club.
[30:05.140 --> 30:06.140]  He also got soul.
[30:06.140 --> 30:10.380]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment to share one man's life-changing
[30:10.380 --> 30:14.380]  encounter with the wrong end of an exotic dancer's shoe.
[30:14.380 --> 30:19.700]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database
[30:19.700 --> 30:21.460]  of your personal information.
[30:21.460 --> 30:22.460]  That's creepy.
[30:22.460 --> 30:24.780]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:24.780 --> 30:27.860]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:27.860 --> 30:31.980]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking
[30:31.980 --> 30:34.260]  cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[30:34.260 --> 30:38.740]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[30:38.740 --> 30:41.620]  Great search results and total privacy.
[30:41.620 --> 30:44.700]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:44.700 --> 30:48.980]  Michael Ireland got much more than an eyeful at South Florida's Cheetah Strip Club.
[30:48.980 --> 30:52.780]  He was bellied up to the bar where the exotic suki was performing.
[30:52.780 --> 30:56.740]  Followed by a grope, she turned suddenly and nailed Ireland in the eye with the metal heel
[30:56.740 --> 30:58.300]  of her platform shoe.
[30:58.300 --> 30:59.300]  The result?
[30:59.300 --> 31:02.020]  Broken eye and nosebones and permanent double vision.
[31:02.020 --> 31:06.020]  Ireland sued and walked away with a cool $650 grant.
[31:06.020 --> 31:09.100]  I had to dig deep, but I did find a moral to the story.
[31:09.100 --> 31:13.600]  A strip club might seem a safe place till you take a high heel in the face.
[31:13.600 --> 31:17.900]  It could double your vision and you'll suffer derision, but you'll score big time by filing
[31:17.900 --> 31:18.900]  a case.
[31:18.900 --> 31:20.460]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:20.460 --> 31:22.900]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:50.460 --> 32:13.260]  We're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.260 --> 32:16.300]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:16.300 --> 32:20.020]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.020 --> 32:24.180]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.180 --> 32:25.580]  our rights through due process.
[32:25.580 --> 32:29.540]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.540 --> 32:33.300]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.300 --> 32:35.660]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.660 --> 32:39.700]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and
[32:39.700 --> 32:41.020]  ordering your copy today.
[32:41.020 --> 32:44.260]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.260 --> 32:48.780]  The Law Versus The Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.780 --> 32:50.580]  documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.580 --> 32:55.060]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[32:55.060 --> 33:02.300]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.300 --> 33:06.300]  Live, free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:06.300 --> 33:24.300]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm going to solve them, to the head of government then, prosecute
[33:24.300 --> 33:25.300]  them.
[33:25.300 --> 33:26.300]  Okay.
[33:26.300 --> 33:27.300]  All set.
[33:27.300 --> 33:47.300]  I need a prosecutor to come and help me, prosecute them wicked leader, yeah, you see, the Mamorra
[33:47.300 --> 33:52.820]  are liars, them tell who, them are liars, they tell sick stories, do not believe me,
[33:52.820 --> 33:58.780]  they say what them tell me, 3% of America vote for Bush, so how the hell he get the
[33:58.780 --> 33:59.780]  presidency?
[33:59.780 --> 34:00.780]  That's why me have to...
[34:00.780 --> 34:01.780]  All right, folks, we are back.
[34:01.780 --> 34:02.780]  This is RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[34:02.780 --> 34:03.780]  All right.
[34:03.780 --> 34:11.140]  Now, let's continue on with this study about the ordinances attempting to imitate state
[34:11.140 --> 34:13.580]  law and be binding upon the public.
[34:13.580 --> 34:26.500]  Now, once again, recall that Article 3, Section 1, we specifically gave lawmaking power only
[34:26.500 --> 34:27.500]  to the legislature.
[34:27.500 --> 34:28.500]  All right.
[34:28.500 --> 34:29.500]  Now, listen carefully.
[34:29.500 --> 34:32.940]  I'll read it one more time just so we got this straight.
[34:32.940 --> 34:38.180]  Article 3, Section 1, Senate and House of Representatives, the legislative power of
[34:38.180 --> 34:45.620]  this state shall be vested in a Senate and House of Representatives, which shall be styled
[34:45.620 --> 34:48.580]  the legislature of the state of Texas.
[34:48.580 --> 34:57.740]  Now, in relation to the powers given to municipalities under Article 11 of the Texas Constitution,
[34:57.740 --> 35:04.620]  I wanna read you the pertinent part of Article 11, Section 5, as it applies to what we're
[35:04.620 --> 35:05.780]  discussing.
[35:05.780 --> 35:13.220]  The adoption or amendment of charters is subject to such limitations as may be prescribed
[35:13.220 --> 35:16.140]  by the legislature.
[35:16.140 --> 35:26.540]  And no charter or any ordinance passed under said charter shall contain any provision inconsistent
[35:26.540 --> 35:33.740]  with the constitution of the state or of the general laws enacted by the legislature of
[35:33.740 --> 35:36.020]  this state.
[35:36.020 --> 35:41.100]  Now let me make sure we understand this from this perspective.
[35:41.100 --> 35:48.700]  If the charter itself cannot be inconsistent or any ordinance passed under that charter
[35:48.700 --> 36:01.260]  cannot be inconsistent with any provision of the Texas Constitution, how then can an
[36:01.260 --> 36:09.220]  ordinance be construed as the law of the state and that not be a violation of the provisions
[36:09.220 --> 36:17.380]  of Article 3, Section 1, where the legislative power is delegated solely to the legislature?
[36:17.380 --> 36:22.420]  Not only is that power delegated solely to the legislature, we are now gonna go step
[36:22.420 --> 36:27.860]  by step through each section of Article 3 that makes it very clear that only the legislature
[36:27.860 --> 36:37.860]  can perform the necessary steps and functions for anything to be enacted as a law in Texas.
[36:37.860 --> 36:40.620]  So let's go through that and see how this works.
[36:40.620 --> 36:46.340]  Again, it's not very difficult unless of course you're a lawyer or a representative, then
[36:46.340 --> 36:52.180]  it's almost impossible to understand plain English, but let's try it anyway.
[36:52.180 --> 36:59.860]  Section 29 of Article 3, Texas Constitution, enacting clause of laws.
[36:59.860 --> 37:07.060]  The enacting clause of all laws shall be, be it enacted by the legislature of the state
[37:07.060 --> 37:15.500]  of Texas, does a municipal or county ordinance contain that enacting clause?
[37:15.500 --> 37:24.220]  The answer is no, and if it did, it would be fraud and it would be sedition, why?
[37:24.220 --> 37:31.900]  Because the clause says that the legislature of the state of Texas created this, and if
[37:31.900 --> 37:38.100]  it's being done by a municipality or a county commissioner's court, that isn't the legislature.
[37:38.100 --> 37:43.340]  That would be a usurpation of power and authority given to one department of government, not
[37:43.340 --> 37:50.060]  to any of the so-called political subdivisions of government, okay?
[37:50.060 --> 37:58.780]  Section 30 of Article 3, laws passed by bill, amendments changing purpose.
[37:58.780 --> 38:08.540]  No law shall be passed except by bill, and no bill shall be so amended in its passage
[38:08.540 --> 38:17.120]  through either house as to change its original purpose, got it?
[38:17.120 --> 38:25.060]  No law shall be passed except by bill, and no bill is not a guy, okay?
[38:25.060 --> 38:32.700]  Is a city ordinance or a county commissioner's court ordinance or order or an order of a
[38:32.700 --> 38:39.740]  court of record, are any of those things initiated by a bill?
[38:39.740 --> 38:51.780]  No, they are not, they're not, and they certainly are not started and carried through and voted
[38:51.780 --> 38:57.700]  into existence by the state legislature.
[38:57.700 --> 39:02.900]  So we now have strike two.
[39:02.900 --> 39:10.780]  All right, oh, and by the way, when you read 32, this is going to be the real clincher
[39:10.780 --> 39:16.220]  to everything else that we do, but this one is cement, okay?
[39:16.220 --> 39:23.220]  Section 32, reading on three several days suspension of rule.
[39:23.220 --> 39:29.780]  No bill, once again, it doesn't say an ordinance, it doesn't say a rule, it doesn't say a court
[39:29.780 --> 39:38.500]  opinion, it says no bill, because laws must be initiated by bill, okay?
[39:38.500 --> 39:39.500]  By bill.
[39:39.500 --> 39:49.200]  Now, I'm sorry, I went to 32, I need to read 31, 31, origination in either house and amendment.
[39:49.200 --> 39:55.940]  Laws may originate in either house, and when passed by such house may be amended, altered
[39:55.940 --> 39:58.080]  or rejected by the other.
[39:58.080 --> 39:59.080]  What house?
[39:59.080 --> 40:05.060]  House of representatives and the other house known as the Senate, again, the two houses
[40:05.060 --> 40:12.060]  of the Texas legislature, not city commissioners, not county commissioners, none of those, it's
[40:12.060 --> 40:17.460]  not a judge in a court, it's not a Supreme Court panel of judges.
[40:17.460 --> 40:22.740]  It is the legislature, all right?
[40:22.740 --> 40:29.340]  Now, reading on three several days, no bill shall have the force of a law until it has
[40:29.340 --> 40:36.340]  been read on three several days in each house and free discussion allowed thereon, now that's
[40:36.340 --> 40:42.940]  section 32, and that is also strike three, okay?
[40:42.940 --> 40:53.660]  Rules, no ordinance, no court opinion, no rulemaking, follows 29, 30, 31 or 32 so far,
[40:53.660 --> 40:58.220]  so I'm sorry, that's strike four, okay?
[40:58.220 --> 40:59.540]  Do we have a strike five?
[40:59.540 --> 41:03.620]  Well, let's see, section 33, revenue bills.
[41:03.620 --> 41:08.860]  All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the house of representatives.
[41:08.860 --> 41:10.460]  Bills for raising revenue.
[41:10.460 --> 41:16.820]  Do cities and county commissioners create ordinances that are for the purpose of raising
[41:16.820 --> 41:17.820]  revenue?
[41:17.820 --> 41:18.820]  Yes, they do.
[41:18.820 --> 41:24.580]  Well, since this is stuff for raising revenue, how can they vote upon that?
[41:24.580 --> 41:27.560]  How can they create that and make it binding upon the public?
[41:27.560 --> 41:33.060]  It's not that they can't do it for their own internal functions, but they most certainly
[41:33.060 --> 41:38.220]  cannot use it against the public.
[41:38.220 --> 41:40.820]  How can they do it?
[41:40.820 --> 41:46.740]  That ladies and gentlemen would be strike five, okay?
[41:46.740 --> 41:50.860]  Section 34, defeated bills and resolutions.
[41:50.860 --> 41:54.460]  Now this is something I discussed in class yesterday and this is going to take a minute
[41:54.460 --> 41:58.820]  to go through, but it's going to be very interesting when I do this because you need to understand
[41:58.820 --> 42:07.040]  how the legislature is violating section 34 every single session with almost every single
[42:07.040 --> 42:08.700]  bill.
[42:08.700 --> 42:12.500]  If you don't believe me, you go down and look and see if there is not always what I'm about
[42:12.500 --> 42:16.060]  to describe going on down there.
[42:16.060 --> 42:19.580]  Section 34, defeated bills and resolutions.
[42:19.580 --> 42:25.980]  After a bill has been considered and defeated by either house of the legislature, no bill
[42:25.980 --> 42:34.900]  containing the same substance shall be passed into a law during the same session.
[42:34.900 --> 42:41.840]  After a resolution has been acted on and defeated, no resolution containing the same substance
[42:41.840 --> 42:45.420]  shall be considered at the same session.
[42:45.420 --> 42:49.660]  Have you people not noticed that when your legislators put together a bill, they always
[42:49.660 --> 42:57.440]  put together two versions of that bill and they originate in different places?
[42:57.440 --> 43:04.940]  They will have different titles, but they will deal with the same subject matter, okay?
[43:04.940 --> 43:10.300]  But because the titles are different, the presumption of the subject matter is also
[43:10.300 --> 43:12.300]  different.
[43:12.300 --> 43:18.060]  And thus, even though one of those bills dealing with that subject gets defeated, the other
[43:18.060 --> 43:22.280]  one can still be passed and carried through.
[43:22.280 --> 43:27.020]  That would be in direct violation of section 34.
[43:27.020 --> 43:30.860]  But if you don't believe they're doing it, go down and go back through the legislative
[43:30.860 --> 43:36.420]  bills and see which two always match up and that one of them got passed while the other
[43:36.420 --> 43:39.740]  got defeated and see if this isn't true.
[43:39.740 --> 43:41.700]  All right, folks.
[43:41.700 --> 43:44.540]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Monday night show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[43:44.540 --> 43:45.540]  You all hang in there.
[43:45.540 --> 43:48.220]  We're going to continue this discussion when I get back after this break.
[43:48.220 --> 43:51.180]  Collars, you all are going to have to hang on for a little bit because this might take
[43:51.180 --> 43:54.820]  a little bit longer, but I'll get to you eventually if you're able to hold on.
[43:54.820 --> 43:55.820]  All right, folks.
[43:55.820 --> 43:56.820]  We'll be right back.
[44:25.920 --> 44:27.700]  And now you can too.
[44:27.700 --> 44:31.880]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:31.880 --> 44:40.060]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[44:40.060 --> 44:43.300]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.300 --> 44:49.500]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.500 --> 44:56.500]  and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free
[44:57.220 --> 45:00.220]  866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.220 --> 45:07.220]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our
[45:09.380 --> 45:14.720]  store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas. I'm Brave New Books and
[45:14.720 --> 45:19.460]  Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.460 --> 45:23.860]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.860 --> 45:27.900]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian EME oil,
[45:27.900 --> 45:34.900]  lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find
[45:35.980 --> 45:42.980]  us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com. Don't
[45:42.980 --> 45:49.980]  forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products. naturespureorganics.com.
[46:12.980 --> 46:19.980]  Thanks for watching.
[46:42.980 --> 46:49.980]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Alright, now we're going to continue
[46:56.340 --> 47:03.340]  this on here. Now what I'm about to read you is section 35 of the Texas Constitution. Now
[47:05.100 --> 47:10.740]  I want to read you, before I read the current version of it, I want to read you section
[47:10.740 --> 47:17.740]  35 as it existed in the original 1876, which they claim is our current constitution here
[47:18.060 --> 47:25.060]  in Texas, plus amendments. Okay? But I want you to read the type of limitation section
[47:25.860 --> 47:32.860]  35 used to have on the power of the legislature to sneak laws into existence without our knowledge.
[47:32.860 --> 47:39.300]  Sneak laws into existence without our knowledge. Okay? Pay close attention to the way this
[47:39.300 --> 47:46.300]  originally read. Article 3, section 35. No bill except general appropriations bills,
[47:48.860 --> 47:53.940]  which may embrace the various subjects and accounts for and on account of which monies
[47:53.940 --> 48:00.940]  are appropriated, shall contain more than one subject. Now that used to say object.
[48:00.940 --> 48:07.940]  Okay? But now it says more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title. So
[48:09.420 --> 48:15.280]  the subject of the legislation in the bill has to be expressed in its title under the
[48:15.280 --> 48:22.280]  original 1876. Here's the rest of it. But if any subject shall be embraced in an act
[48:22.280 --> 48:29.280]  which shall not be expressed in the title, such act shall be void only as to so much
[48:33.760 --> 48:40.760]  thereof as shall not be so expressed. Now used to, it was required on the Texas constitution
[48:40.760 --> 48:47.760]  that you could not change any legislation from its original intent and purpose, i.e.
[48:48.680 --> 48:55.680]  its subject, to encompass any other subjects by amendment. If you were going to change
[48:58.040 --> 49:05.040]  the subject or add a subject to existing legislation, you had to first repeal that legislation,
[49:05.040 --> 49:12.040]  make your amended changes, and reenact it in its entirety. That was mandated in the
[49:12.680 --> 49:19.680]  Texas constitution. Well, let me show you what they did in the current changes to that
[49:19.720 --> 49:26.720]  section. 35, subjects and titles of bills. A, no bill except general appropriations bills,
[49:26.720 --> 49:31.720]  which may embrace the various subjects and accounts for and on account of which monies
[49:31.720 --> 49:36.720]  are appropriated, shall contain more than one subject. Okay, so far so good, looks just
[49:36.720 --> 49:43.720]  like the original. But now we've got a subsection B and C that were not in the original. So
[49:44.520 --> 49:51.520]  what does B say? The rules of the legislation are not in the original. So what does B say?
[49:51.520 --> 49:58.520]  The rules of procedure of each house shall require that the subject of each bill be expressed
[49:59.040 --> 50:06.040]  in its title in a manner that gives the legislature and the public reasonable notice of that subject.
[50:09.000 --> 50:16.000]  The legislature is solely responsible for determining compliance with the rule. Now
[50:16.000 --> 50:22.000]  you see that? They gave themselves the power to determine whether or not that rule had
[50:22.000 --> 50:29.000]  been complied with. Now let's see what C says. A law, including a law enacted before the
[50:31.080 --> 50:38.080]  effective date of this subsection, may not be held void on the basis of an insufficient
[50:38.080 --> 50:45.080]  title. Now remember, the original one said that if there was a subject that was not expressed
[50:45.440 --> 50:50.440]  in the title, that section of it was void. Here, however, they've changed it to where
[50:50.440 --> 50:57.440]  it says, a law, including a law enacted before the effective date of this subsection, may
[51:01.040 --> 51:06.040]  not be held void on the basis of an insufficient title. Now remember, the original one said
[51:06.040 --> 51:11.040]  that if there was a subject that was not expressed in the title, that section of it was void
[51:11.040 --> 51:16.040]  on the basis of an insufficient title. Now there are two issues here. One is the one
[51:16.040 --> 51:20.040]  we're discussing in the difference between the original and this one, which is that if
[51:20.040 --> 51:26.040]  the title does not express the subject being written into the legislation, that subject
[51:26.040 --> 51:33.040]  in the legislation is void, okay, which this negates. But the other thing this does is
[51:33.040 --> 51:40.040]  the law enacted before the effective date of this subsection, okay? So if something
[51:43.880 --> 51:50.880]  was enacted before this subsection became law, this goes back and changes it to now
[51:50.960 --> 51:57.960]  comply with this reiteration, okay? That creates a problem here, folks, especially since they're
[51:57.960 --> 52:02.960]  considering the Constitution law and their definitions. They're saying the Constitution
[52:02.960 --> 52:09.960]  can now conflict with itself or void itself by what they do to it. But in any case, this
[52:09.960 --> 52:15.960]  allows them to create legislation and come back and change subjects within the legislation
[52:15.960 --> 52:21.960]  that are not in the title. They can add, they can take away, they can completely make substantive
[52:21.960 --> 52:27.960]  changes all through revisionary systems that don't require the same things. And let me
[52:27.960 --> 52:36.960]  prove that they don't require the same things. Section 36, Revival or Amendment by Reference,
[52:36.960 --> 52:42.960]  Reenactment and Publication at Length. Let me read you the original once again compared
[52:42.960 --> 52:49.960]  to how it exists right now. Section 36 of the 1876 is read, Reenactment and Publication
[52:49.960 --> 52:56.960]  in 1876 is read, No law shall be revived or amended by reference to its title, but in
[52:56.960 --> 53:03.960]  such case the act revived or the section or sections amended shall be reenacted and published
[53:03.960 --> 53:10.960]  at length, okay? Well, this is how it reads now. Revival or Amendment by Reference, Reenactment
[53:10.960 --> 53:15.960]  and Publication at Length. No law shall be revived or amended by reference to its title,
[53:15.960 --> 53:22.960]  but in such case the act revived or the section or sections amended shall be reenacted and
[53:22.960 --> 53:28.960]  published at length, okay? Slightly different, but that's not the biggest problem with it.
[53:28.960 --> 53:35.960]  There is another. Section 37, Reference to Committee and Report. No bill shall be considered
[53:35.960 --> 53:41.960]  unless it has been first referred to a committee and reported thereon. And no bill shall be
[53:41.960 --> 53:46.960]  passed which has not been presented and referred to and reported from a committee at least
[53:46.960 --> 53:50.960]  three days before the final adjournment of the legislature. So here we are all the way
[53:50.960 --> 53:58.960]  down to Section 37. And so far we have not found a single thing authorizing a municipality
[53:58.960 --> 54:04.960]  or a county to do what is required to do to create law. They're not given any authority
[54:04.960 --> 54:11.960]  here to do it whatsoever. Section 38, Signing Bills and Joint Resolutions Entry on Journals.
[54:11.960 --> 54:15.960]  The presiding officer of each house shall, in the presence of the house over which he
[54:15.960 --> 54:21.960]  presides, sign all bills and joint resolutions passed by the legislature. Doesn't say the
[54:21.960 --> 54:27.960]  municipality, doesn't say the county commissioners, it says the legislature. After their titles
[54:27.960 --> 54:32.960]  have been publicly read before signing and the fact of signing shall be entered on the
[54:32.960 --> 54:39.960]  journals. Now again, this part about after their titles have been publicly read before
[54:39.960 --> 54:45.960]  signing, well now it's potentially possible to have bills whose subject matter is not
[54:45.960 --> 54:50.960]  in the title being read. And yet these people are not reading these bills just like Congress
[54:50.960 --> 54:56.960]  doesn't read its bills. How can I prove that? I can prove it because in virtually every
[54:56.960 --> 55:03.960]  bill for the last 40 years they have used the same illegal unconstitutional emergency
[55:03.960 --> 55:09.960]  clause to pass it without reading it on the floor of each house over three several days
[55:09.960 --> 55:17.960]  as is specifically required under this constitution. Okay? Go back and look at the emergency clause
[55:17.960 --> 55:22.960]  on the actual bills and you will find it does not in any way comply with Section 62 of Article
[55:22.960 --> 55:31.960]  3. But we'll get there shortly. All right. Section 39, time of taking effective laws,
[55:31.960 --> 55:37.960]  emergencies, entry on journal. Now there's emergencies in the title of Section 39, yet
[55:37.960 --> 55:42.960]  at no time is there the mention of any form of emergency or the term emergency in this
[55:42.960 --> 55:49.960]  entire Section 39. Listen carefully. No laws passed by the legislature except the General
[55:49.960 --> 55:55.960]  Appropriation Act shall take effect or go into force until 90 days after the adjournment
[55:55.960 --> 56:00.960]  of the session at which it was enacted unless the legislature shall by vote of two thirds
[56:00.960 --> 56:06.960]  of all the members elected to each house otherwise direct. Said vote to be taken by yeas and
[56:06.960 --> 56:15.960]  nays and entered upon the journals. That's the current one. Okay? Now, Section 39 in
[56:15.960 --> 56:21.960]  the original has a reference to emergencies. No laws passed by the legislature except the
[56:21.960 --> 56:27.960]  General Appropriation Act which shall take effect or go into force or shall take effect
[56:27.960 --> 56:33.960]  or go into force until 90 days after the adjournment of the session at which it was enacted unless
[56:33.960 --> 56:40.960]  in case of an emergency which emergency must be expressed in a preamble or in the body
[56:40.960 --> 56:45.960]  of the Act, the legislature shall by a vote of two thirds of all the members elected to
[56:45.960 --> 56:51.960]  each house otherwise direct said vote to be taken by yeas and nays and entered upon the
[56:51.960 --> 56:57.960]  journals. So they've taken out the requirement that an emergency be declared within the language
[56:57.960 --> 57:05.960]  of the bill or in its title in order to get that two thirds vote to pass it and make it
[57:05.960 --> 57:11.960]  effective less than 90 days from the date of enactment. Okay? They keep making it where
[57:11.960 --> 57:19.960]  they can create legislation faster and faster and in greater quantity every single session.
[57:19.960 --> 57:25.960]  This is how they made the recodifications of all the codes in 1995 at least as far as
[57:25.960 --> 57:31.960]  the transportation code for sure because that's when it was reenacted, all 3,885 pages of
[57:31.960 --> 57:37.960]  it. Tell me they read 3,885 pages on the floor of each house over three several days. No,
[57:37.960 --> 57:41.960]  they didn't. You know why I know they didn't? Because the emergency clause at the end of
[57:41.960 --> 57:48.960]  the bill says they didn't. However, the emergency clause at the end of the bill directly violates
[57:48.960 --> 57:57.960]  Section 62 of the Texas Constitution under Article 3. Okay? All right. One more of these
[57:57.960 --> 58:01.960]  when we get back which will be Section 40 and I want to show you the last nail in the
[58:01.960 --> 58:08.960]  coffin that says who has law making power and that no municipality, no court, no county
[58:08.960 --> 58:16.960]  commissioners court, no rule making agency can comply with the requirements of what it
[58:16.960 --> 58:23.960]  takes to make binding law upon the public here in Texas. And yet they're doing it people
[58:23.960 --> 58:28.960]  and we're letting them get away with it. You need to be standing up in front of your legislators
[58:28.960 --> 58:33.960]  pointing this out to them and telling them just how short lived their political career
[58:33.960 --> 58:39.960]  will be if this does not change immediately. All right folks, we're about to go to break
[58:39.960 --> 58:49.960]  so y'all hang in there. We will be right back.
[58:49.960 --> 58:55.960]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.960 --> 59:00.960]  because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying
[59:00.960 --> 59:06.960]  the text but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. Enter
[59:06.960 --> 59:13.960]  the recovery version. First this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate but the
[59:13.960 --> 59:19.960]  real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages
[59:19.960 --> 59:24.960]  are opened up in a marvelous way providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond
[59:24.960 --> 59:30.960]  which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free
[59:30.960 --> 59:36.960]  recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours
[59:36.960 --> 59:46.960]  by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:46.960 --> 01:00:02.960]  That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. Logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.960 --> 01:00:07.960]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates. Online
[01:00:07.960 --> 01:00:13.960]  at thelibertybeat.com. I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, March 16, 2015.
[01:00:13.960 --> 01:00:22.960]  Gold is trading at $1,159. Silver at $15.67 and Bitcoin is trading around $290.59. The
[01:00:22.960 --> 01:00:27.960]  Liberty Beat is brought to you by Coinarch, offering innovative online trading solutions
[01:00:27.960 --> 01:00:33.960]  for Bitcoin. Visit coinarch.com and sign up using coupon code MAX and get free brokerage
[01:00:33.960 --> 01:00:40.960]  for the first seven days. It only takes $10 to start an account. That's coinarch.com.
[01:00:40.960 --> 01:00:45.960]  In the news, following the decision to delay a planned bullet ban, President Obama said
[01:00:45.960 --> 01:00:50.960]  he remains committed to gun regulation. White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest stated
[01:00:50.960 --> 01:00:54.960]  that Obama wants to establish common sense rules that prevent criminals from getting
[01:00:54.960 --> 01:01:00.960]  weapons. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives delayed a ban on 5.56 millimeter
[01:01:00.960 --> 01:01:09.960]  M855 green tip bullets after public responses overwhelmingly against the measure. A Los Angeles
[01:01:09.960 --> 01:01:14.960]  police officer is missing, likely on the run, after being named as a person of interest
[01:01:14.960 --> 01:01:19.960]  in the shooting death of a 23-year-old man early Friday. Investigators downed the vehicle
[01:01:19.960 --> 01:01:24.960]  belonging to 27-year-old Henry Sullis, not far from the scene of where Salome Rodriguez
[01:01:24.960 --> 01:01:29.960]  Jr. was downshot to death. It's alleged that the two men were involved in a fight that
[01:01:29.960 --> 01:01:34.960]  escalated to the fatal shooting. Sullis fell to report to work Saturday and the search
[01:01:34.960 --> 01:01:42.960]  continues for his whereabouts. A George Washington University Research Institute has filed a
[01:01:42.960 --> 01:01:47.960]  lawsuit to force the release of transcripts of Henry Kissinger's phone calls during his
[01:01:47.960 --> 01:01:52.960]  time as Secretary of State in the 1970s. The National Security Archive said the lawsuit
[01:01:52.960 --> 01:01:57.960]  was in response to unnecessary delays from the State Department. The Archive is attempting
[01:01:57.960 --> 01:02:02.960]  to get the last 700 transcripts of Kissinger's phone conversations. Researchers are seeking
[01:02:02.960 --> 01:02:08.960]  new information regarding Kissinger's role in U.S. relations with China, Cyprus and others.
[01:02:08.960 --> 01:02:14.960]  Today's broadcast of The Liberty Beat is sponsored by Brave New Books, your source for
[01:02:14.960 --> 01:02:20.960]  one-world-way, tangy tangerine and clearly filtered fluoride filters, located in Austin,
[01:02:20.960 --> 01:02:27.960]  Texas, at 1904 Guadalupe Street or online at bravenewbookstore.com. Looking to promote
[01:02:27.960 --> 01:02:32.960]  your business for cause to tens of thousands of loyal listeners? Well, for a limited time
[01:02:32.960 --> 01:02:37.960]  only, The Liberty Beat is offering you the chance to stay big while spreading your message.
[01:02:37.960 --> 01:02:42.960]  It's simple. Just sign up for three months of advertising and get your fourth month free.
[01:02:42.960 --> 01:02:47.960]  Don't miss out on this unique opportunity. Just visit thelibertybeat.com slash advertise
[01:02:47.960 --> 01:02:53.960]  and use coupon code GCN in the describe your company section. This is The Liberty Beat
[01:02:53.960 --> 01:02:59.960]  for Monday, March 16, 2015. Check out the website at thelibertybeat.com.
[01:02:59.960 --> 01:03:14.960]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty. I read his book and it says he cares not for
[01:03:14.960 --> 01:03:29.960]  the unsightly. These warm others come by that term rightly. I won't pay for the war with
[01:03:29.960 --> 01:03:37.960]  my body. Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money. I won't pay for the fun with my body.
[01:03:37.960 --> 01:03:44.960]  Their plans wicked and their logic shoddy. Ain't gonna pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:44.960 --> 01:03:49.960]  I won't pay for the boys with my money. All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of
[01:03:49.960 --> 01:03:56.960]  Law Radio. All right, now real quick, Section 40, Texas Constitution under Article 3, Special
[01:03:56.960 --> 01:04:02.960]  Sessions, Subjects of Legislation and Duration. When the legislature shall be convened in
[01:04:02.960 --> 01:04:08.960]  a special session, there shall be no legislation upon subjects other than those designated
[01:04:08.960 --> 01:04:14.960]  in the proclamation of the governor calling such session or presented to them by the governor.
[01:04:14.960 --> 01:04:20.960]  And no such session shall be of no longer duration than 30 days. So only legislators
[01:04:20.960 --> 01:04:24.960]  can have special sessions for making laws and the governor has to call them and they
[01:04:24.960 --> 01:04:29.960]  can only consider those things which he calls them for or gives them while they're there.
[01:04:29.960 --> 01:04:36.960]  Again, he's not calling a commissioner's court. He's not calling city council. These people
[01:04:36.960 --> 01:04:44.960]  can't make law. Now, let me show you one of the other ways the Texas legislature is bamboozling
[01:04:44.960 --> 01:04:52.960]  us and at the same time violating the Texas Constitution. Now, this is something they
[01:04:52.960 --> 01:04:58.960]  tried to do in Section 43 of the Texas Constitution where it talks about revision of laws.
[01:04:58.960 --> 01:05:07.960]  Subsection A, now this was all A was amended and B was added in 1986, but listen to this.
[01:05:07.960 --> 01:05:11.960]  Subsection A, the legislature shall provide for revising, digesting and publishing the
[01:05:11.960 --> 01:05:17.960]  law, civil and criminal, provided that in the adoption of and giving effect to any such
[01:05:17.960 --> 01:05:24.960]  digest or revision, the legislature shall not be limited by Sections 35 and 36 of this
[01:05:24.960 --> 01:05:30.960]  article. In this section, revision includes the revision of the statutes on a particular
[01:05:30.960 --> 01:05:36.960]  subject and any enactment having the purpose declared in the enactment of codifying without
[01:05:36.960 --> 01:05:44.960]  substantive change statutes that individually relate to different subjects. Okay. Now back
[01:05:44.960 --> 01:05:52.960]  to 35 and 36 real quick. What were they? 35 subjects and titles, 36 revival by reference
[01:05:52.960 --> 01:05:58.960]  and reenactment, repeal and republication. They're saying that when they do a recodification,
[01:05:58.960 --> 01:06:04.960]  they're not bound by those two rules. But if they're not bound by those two, that does
[01:06:04.960 --> 01:06:11.960]  not eliminate the remaining rules, including the one where they're required to read this
[01:06:11.960 --> 01:06:16.960]  stuff on the floor of each house over three several days. Now, listen very carefully.
[01:06:16.960 --> 01:06:22.960]  I'm going to take you all the way down to Section 62 of Article 3. And I want you to
[01:06:22.960 --> 01:06:31.960]  see exactly what the Constitution itself constitutes a valid emergency for which they may suspend
[01:06:31.960 --> 01:06:37.960]  the aforementioned rules. And believe me, it's not for the reason they want you to believe
[01:06:37.960 --> 01:06:41.960]  it is. I know we've gone over this before, but this is too important to keep ignoring
[01:06:41.960 --> 01:06:47.960]  people because your rights are disappearing at a monumentally rapid pace and you're not
[01:06:47.960 --> 01:06:55.960]  paying any attention. Okay. Section 62, Texas Constitution under Article 3, continuity of
[01:06:55.960 --> 01:07:01.960]  state and local governmental operations, suspension of constitutional procedural rules.
[01:07:01.960 --> 01:07:10.960]  Get that? Suspension of constitutional procedural rules. Subsection A, the legislature.
[01:07:10.960 --> 01:07:16.960]  In order to ensure continuity of state and local governmental operations in periods of
[01:07:16.960 --> 01:07:25.960]  emergency resulting from disasters caused by enemy attack, shall have the power and
[01:07:25.960 --> 01:07:30.960]  the immediate duty to provide for prompt and temporary succession to the powers and duties
[01:07:30.960 --> 01:07:36.960]  of public offices of whatever nature and whether filled by election or appointment, the
[01:07:36.960 --> 01:07:41.960]  incumbents of which may become unavailable for carrying on the powers and duties of such
[01:07:41.960 --> 01:07:47.960]  offices, provided, however, that Article 1 of the Constitution of Texas, known as the
[01:07:47.960 --> 01:07:52.960]  Bill of Rights, shall not be in any manner affected, amended, impaired, suspended, repealed,
[01:07:52.960 --> 01:07:58.960]  or suspended hereby. Now, to get that, no article, no part of the Bill of Rights, well,
[01:07:58.960 --> 01:08:03.960]  that would include Article 1, Section 29, that says they can't create a law or anything
[01:08:03.960 --> 01:08:08.960]  else that violates any provision of the Bill of Rights or the remainder of the Texas
[01:08:08.960 --> 01:08:13.960]  Constitution where it's immediately void. I would say that applies to all of these
[01:08:13.960 --> 01:08:17.960]  provisions we read on the definition of the term law where they're attempting to
[01:08:17.960 --> 01:08:23.960]  circumvent the constitutional limitations on who can make law by simply adding their
[01:08:23.960 --> 01:08:29.960]  rules to an amendment and pretending it's law. But I digress. Let's finish this part
[01:08:29.960 --> 01:08:39.960]  of it. All right? Provided, or I'm sorry, be, when such a period of emergency or, now
[01:08:39.960 --> 01:08:46.960]  remember, the emergency is relating to disasters caused by enemy attack or the immediate threat
[01:08:46.960 --> 01:08:53.960]  of enemy attack exists, the legislature may suspend procedural rules imposed by this
[01:08:53.960 --> 01:09:00.960]  Constitution that relate to one, the order of business of the legislature, two, the
[01:09:00.960 --> 01:09:06.960]  percentage of each house of the legislature necessary to constitute a quorum, three,
[01:09:06.960 --> 01:09:11.960]  the requirement that a bill must be read on three days in each house before it has the
[01:09:11.960 --> 01:09:17.960]  force of law, four, the requirement that a bill must be referred to and reported from
[01:09:17.960 --> 01:09:24.960]  committee before its consideration, and five, the date on which laws passed by the
[01:09:24.960 --> 01:09:32.960]  legislature take effect. Those five rules can only be suspended if there is an emergency
[01:09:32.960 --> 01:09:43.960]  relating to enemy invasion or attack. Okay? That's it. Nothing else. And yet, they
[01:09:43.960 --> 01:09:48.960]  amended one of the articles up there to try to give a four-fifths vote to the suspension
[01:09:48.960 --> 01:09:55.960]  of reading that rule. The problem is, is that four-fifths vote does not amend, that amendment
[01:09:55.960 --> 01:10:02.960]  does not amend Section 62. Therefore, they have to be taken together. There was no
[01:10:02.960 --> 01:10:09.960]  percentage of how many members were required in order to suspend that rule listed in
[01:10:09.960 --> 01:10:16.960]  Section 62 down here. So the only reasonable argument and reading of the amendment added
[01:10:16.960 --> 01:10:21.960]  to Section 33 up there, I think it is, or 32, dealing with the three several days reading
[01:10:21.960 --> 01:10:27.960]  and the suspension of that by a four-fifths vote, the four-fifths vote is what is required
[01:10:27.960 --> 01:10:35.960]  to make the emergency suspension valid. Got it? Because if they amended just Section 32,
[01:10:35.960 --> 01:10:41.960]  and that's all the people voted on, but now they're going to say that Section 32 of its
[01:10:41.960 --> 01:10:48.960]  own volition repeals or amends the operation of Section 62, then that would be a bogus
[01:10:48.960 --> 01:10:54.960]  reading because the people never voted to change 62. That was never put before us. So
[01:10:54.960 --> 01:11:01.960]  the only thing that can happen is that they have to be taken together. Now, knowing what
[01:11:01.960 --> 01:11:08.960]  the emergency clause is or what its basis is, let's see how that emergency clause gets
[01:11:08.960 --> 01:11:16.960]  declared. Subsection C, when such a period of emergency or the immediate threat of enemy
[01:11:16.960 --> 01:11:21.960]  attack exists, the governor, after consulting with the lieutenant governor and the speaker
[01:11:21.960 --> 01:11:26.960]  of the House of Representatives, may suspend the constitutional requirements that the
[01:11:26.960 --> 01:11:31.960]  legislature hold its sessions in Austin, the seat of government. When this requirement
[01:11:31.960 --> 01:11:36.960]  has been suspended, the governor shall determine a place other than Austin at which the legislature
[01:11:36.960 --> 01:11:41.960]  will hold its sessions during such period of emergency or immediate threat of enemy
[01:11:41.960 --> 01:11:46.960]  attack. The governor shall notify the lieutenant governor and the speaker of the House of
[01:11:46.960 --> 01:11:51.960]  Representatives of the place and time at which the legislature will meet. The governor may
[01:11:51.960 --> 01:11:56.960]  take security precautions consistent with the state of emergency in determining the
[01:11:56.960 --> 01:12:02.960]  extent to which that information may be released. Now, I needed the first part of Subsection
[01:12:02.960 --> 01:12:10.960]  C to go with D. To suspend the constitutional rules specified by Subsection B of this section,
[01:12:10.960 --> 01:12:18.960]  which was the five that I read you, the governor must issue a proclamation and the House of
[01:12:18.960 --> 01:12:26.960]  Representatives and the Senate must concur in the proclamation as provided by this section.
[01:12:26.960 --> 01:12:33.960]  E, the governor's proclamation must declare that a period of emergency resulting from
[01:12:33.960 --> 01:12:40.960]  disasters caused by enemy attack exists or that the immediate threat of enemy attack
[01:12:40.960 --> 01:12:47.960]  exists and that suspensions of constitutional rules relating to legislative procedure is
[01:12:47.960 --> 01:12:54.960]  necessary to assure continuity of state government. The proclamation must specify the period not
[01:12:54.960 --> 01:13:02.960]  to exceed two years during which the constitutional rules specified by Subsection B of this section
[01:13:02.960 --> 01:13:08.960]  are suspended. The House of Representatives, this is F, the House of Representatives and
[01:13:08.960 --> 01:13:13.960]  the Senate by concurrent resolution approved by the majority of the members present must
[01:13:13.960 --> 01:13:20.960]  concur in the governor's proclamation. A resolution of the House of Representatives
[01:13:20.960 --> 01:13:26.960]  and the Senate concurring in the governor's proclamation suspends the constitutional rules
[01:13:26.960 --> 01:13:32.960]  specified by Subsection B of this section for this period of time specified by the governor's
[01:13:32.960 --> 01:13:40.960]  proclamation. There, ladies and gentlemen, we have one left, which is G, the constitutional
[01:13:40.960 --> 01:13:47.960]  rules specified by Subsection B, again the five that I listed, of this section may not
[01:13:47.960 --> 01:13:53.960]  be suspended for more than two years under a single proclamation. Okay, now that suspension
[01:13:53.960 --> 01:13:59.960]  can be renewed if necessary every two years for two years, but it can't be longer than
[01:13:59.960 --> 01:14:06.960]  two years. But regardless of that, you now know that a governor's signed proclamation
[01:14:06.960 --> 01:14:13.960]  and a concurrence of that proclamation by the House and the Senate are required in order
[01:14:13.960 --> 01:14:21.960]  to suspend any of those rules. Now let me read you the emergency clause used to suspend
[01:14:21.960 --> 01:14:31.960]  all of those rules in relation to the 1995 enactment of Senate Bill 971, which is the
[01:14:31.960 --> 01:14:37.960]  recodification of the Texas Transportation Code. And that is all the way down on page
[01:14:37.960 --> 01:14:47.960]  2,079 of the PDF, or I'm sorry, it's actually page 4,163 of a 4,210-page bill. But here
[01:14:47.960 --> 01:14:55.960]  is Section 28, emergency. The importance of this legislation and the crowded condition
[01:14:55.960 --> 01:15:02.960]  of the calendars in both houses create an emergency and an imperative public necessity
[01:15:02.960 --> 01:15:08.960]  that the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several days in each house
[01:15:08.960 --> 01:15:23.960]  be suspended and this rule is hereby suspended. Guess what? Treason. Got it? Treason.
[01:15:23.960 --> 01:15:34.960]  Your legislators back in 1995, some of which are still in office today, illegally enacted
[01:15:34.960 --> 01:15:44.960]  this recodification, unconstitutionally enacted this recodification. And if you look at the
[01:15:44.960 --> 01:15:50.960]  bill surrounding all the recodified codes, I'm willing to bet that you find exactly the
[01:15:50.960 --> 01:15:58.960]  same emergency clause in every single one. In fact, you will find individual legislation
[01:15:58.960 --> 01:16:06.960]  going back decades that uses exactly the same emergency clause that violates Section 62
[01:16:06.960 --> 01:16:15.960]  of Article 3. Treason. There's no other word for it. It's not even a sedition because
[01:16:15.960 --> 01:16:22.960]  this isn't just an alteration of our Republican form of government outside of the proper
[01:16:22.960 --> 01:16:27.960]  rules and procedures established by us in that Constitution. This is an outright subversion
[01:16:27.960 --> 01:16:37.960]  of the Constitution itself. That's treason. And you're just going to sit there and take
[01:16:37.960 --> 01:16:46.960]  it. Congratulations. I want off this planet. All right. All right, folks. This is Rule
[01:16:46.960 --> 01:16:53.960]  of Law Radio. Call at number 512-646-1984. Give us a call. Give us a holler. Give us
[01:16:53.960 --> 01:16:59.960]  a complaint. Give us a comment. We will be right back.
[01:16:59.960 --> 01:17:03.960]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:17:03.960 --> 01:17:07.960]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:07.960 --> 01:17:11.960]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality
[01:17:11.960 --> 01:17:16.960]  coins and precious metals. We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions
[01:17:16.960 --> 01:17:21.960]  for investors. We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited
[01:17:21.960 --> 01:17:25.960]  metals dealers and journalists. If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find
[01:17:25.960 --> 01:17:30.960]  it. In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and
[01:17:30.960 --> 01:17:35.960]  Pollen Bursts. We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water
[01:17:35.960 --> 01:17:40.960]  Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more. We broker metals IRA accounts and
[01:17:40.960 --> 01:17:47.960]  we also accept Bitcoins as payment. Call us at 512-646-6440. We're located at 7304 Burnet
[01:17:47.960 --> 01:17:51.960]  Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. We're open Monday through Friday
[01:17:51.960 --> 01:18:00.960]  10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.960 --> 01:18:04.960]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:18:04.960 --> 01:18:09.960]  of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time
[01:18:09.960 --> 01:18:15.960]  we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[01:18:15.960 --> 01:18:20.960]  is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated,
[01:18:20.960 --> 01:18:26.960]  and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets
[01:18:26.960 --> 01:18:32.960]  many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust
[01:18:32.960 --> 01:18:38.960]  young Jevity so much we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs,
[01:18:38.960 --> 01:18:44.960]  and many others. When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as
[01:18:44.960 --> 01:18:50.960]  you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want
[01:18:50.960 --> 01:18:56.960]  to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[01:18:56.960 --> 01:19:21.960]  and increase your income. Order now.
[01:19:26.960 --> 01:19:30.960]  Well.
[01:19:30.960 --> 01:19:35.960]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:35.960 --> 01:19:40.960]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plan.
[01:19:40.960 --> 01:19:45.960]  You put the fear in my pocket, took the money from my hand.
[01:19:45.960 --> 01:19:54.960]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:54.960 --> 01:20:02.960]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:20:02.960 --> 01:20:10.960]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, caller number 512-646-1984.
[01:20:10.960 --> 01:20:14.960]  All right, while we're waiting on this now, we're going to see if anybody else calls up,
[01:20:14.960 --> 01:20:18.960]  but we have one caller up on the board. That is Jimmy in Maryland. All right, Jimmy, go ahead.
[01:20:18.960 --> 01:20:20.960]  What do you got?
[01:20:20.960 --> 01:20:28.960]  Well, Eddie, what you took time out to do is to tell us it's very, very disturbing.
[01:20:28.960 --> 01:20:29.960]  Isn't it though?
[01:20:29.960 --> 01:20:37.960]  Yes. I have a lawyer friend that I had him look at your video on Infowars, and he's saying
[01:20:37.960 --> 01:20:46.960]  the Constitution is suspended. He says he plans to possibly relocate to another country.
[01:20:46.960 --> 01:20:52.960]  You know, you tell me how bad the judicial system is broken, and it's so much that...
[01:20:52.960 --> 01:20:58.960]  Whoa, whoa, whoa. Wait, wait, wait, wait. I disagree. The judicial system is not broken.
[01:20:58.960 --> 01:21:04.960]  It is designed this way.
[01:21:04.960 --> 01:21:07.960]  Who runs it?
[01:21:07.960 --> 01:21:08.960]  They do.
[01:21:08.960 --> 01:21:13.960]  Who's they?
[01:21:13.960 --> 01:21:14.960]  The government.
[01:21:14.960 --> 01:21:22.960]  No, the scumbag lawyers that take control of everything, including the government.
[01:21:22.960 --> 01:21:28.960]  See, lawyers are not supposed to be serving in the legislature. That's a violation of the separation of powers.
[01:21:28.960 --> 01:21:34.960]  They're judicial. They're not executive, and they're not legislative, yet they're in their writing law,
[01:21:34.960 --> 01:21:40.960]  and they're interacting as governors and attorney generals. It's a violation of separation of powers.
[01:21:40.960 --> 01:21:44.960]  Again, treason.
[01:21:44.960 --> 01:21:49.960]  Wow. Well, I don't know. Maybe we're going to have to end up if this doesn't change.
[01:21:49.960 --> 01:21:55.960]  Maybe we're going to have to be like he did, just jump ship and leave the country. I don't know, Eddie.
[01:21:55.960 --> 01:22:02.960]  Yeah, well, I think that everybody argues with me about this Shakespeare quote, and that's okay,
[01:22:02.960 --> 01:22:07.960]  but I think somebody went back and edited Shakespeare's work to add this last part to it.
[01:22:07.960 --> 01:22:13.960]  According to them, the original quote is, when Shakespeare says, kill all the lawyers,
[01:22:13.960 --> 01:22:18.960]  the full quote is to ensure chaos, kill all the lawyers.
[01:22:18.960 --> 01:22:27.960]  I disagree to eliminate the majority of conflict that results in chaos, kill all the lawyers,
[01:22:27.960 --> 01:22:31.960]  because they're the ones that start fights where none exist.
[01:22:31.960 --> 01:22:37.960]  They're the ones that does the splitting of hairs where understanding was once the way of life.
[01:22:37.960 --> 01:22:45.960]  They decide to put in shades of gray that don't belong in order to enrich themselves by creating that confusion.
[01:22:45.960 --> 01:22:51.960]  Therefore, you don't cure chaos by keeping lawyers.
[01:22:51.960 --> 01:23:01.960]  I hear you, Duncan. Really something.
[01:23:01.960 --> 01:23:04.960]  I did see your email, by the way.
[01:23:04.960 --> 01:23:08.960]  Yeah, you did. You see, I've been ordered to get a lawyer to come represent me.
[01:23:08.960 --> 01:23:11.960]  Well, did he order you or did he suggest?
[01:23:11.960 --> 01:23:15.960]  Actually, he did, but actually a combination of both.
[01:23:15.960 --> 01:23:18.960]  Well, he cannot order you to acquire counsel.
[01:23:18.960 --> 01:23:22.960]  Okay. Well, he expect me to come in with counsel.
[01:23:22.960 --> 01:23:24.960]  Well, what he expects is irrelevant.
[01:23:24.960 --> 01:23:29.960]  They cannot force a lawyer on you that you don't want.
[01:23:29.960 --> 01:23:32.960]  The United States Supreme Court has said so.
[01:23:32.960 --> 01:23:37.960]  In fact, the case on that is diet.
[01:23:37.960 --> 01:23:40.960]  Let me see if I got it up here anywhere.
[01:23:40.960 --> 01:23:44.960]  It's diet versus state or diet versus United States.
[01:23:44.960 --> 01:23:49.960]  I forget, but I can find it, but that's exactly what the case law says,
[01:23:49.960 --> 01:23:55.960]  that a person has the right to choose whether or not he wants assistance of counsel.
[01:23:55.960 --> 01:24:00.960]  And if he does not want one, the government has no power to force one upon him.
[01:24:00.960 --> 01:24:06.960]  Okay. Well, he made that the condition of why he continued this thing, you know, up until April,
[01:24:06.960 --> 01:24:09.960]  is that I'm supposed to get counsel because I don't know what I'm doing.
[01:24:09.960 --> 01:24:11.960]  I'm incompetent.
[01:24:11.960 --> 01:24:15.960]  That's what he wants you to believe.
[01:24:15.960 --> 01:24:17.960]  Okay. That's exactly what he wants you to believe.
[01:24:17.960 --> 01:24:19.960]  That's why he wants a lawyer to be in there,
[01:24:19.960 --> 01:24:23.960]  because the lawyer can waive all your rights and throw you under the bus,
[01:24:23.960 --> 01:24:25.960]  and there's nothing you can do about it.
[01:24:25.960 --> 01:24:30.960]  People want to know why Texas has a 99.6 conviction rate.
[01:24:30.960 --> 01:24:34.960]  Well, let me tell you why you don't have any due process violations
[01:24:34.960 --> 01:24:38.960]  to go back and sue for that 99% conviction rate.
[01:24:38.960 --> 01:24:44.960]  Your attorney threw you under the bus by waiving all of your due process rights in the beginning.
[01:24:44.960 --> 01:24:48.960]  Have you, has my client been served with a copy of the complaint yet?
[01:24:48.960 --> 01:24:49.960]  Oh, no, we haven't done that.
[01:24:49.960 --> 01:24:50.960]  Well, that's okay.
[01:24:50.960 --> 01:24:53.960]  I'll go ahead and enter a plea and not guilty form, and we'll just go from there.
[01:24:53.960 --> 01:24:55.960]  He just waived your right to notice.
[01:24:55.960 --> 01:24:59.960]  He waived your right to challenge the validity of the complaint on form and substance,
[01:24:59.960 --> 01:25:00.960]  the charging instrument.
[01:25:00.960 --> 01:25:06.960]  He waived it all with that single comment by the entering of that plea.
[01:25:06.960 --> 01:25:08.960]  That's what he did.
[01:25:08.960 --> 01:25:11.960]  When he says, oh, no, Judge, we waive a jury trial,
[01:25:11.960 --> 01:25:15.960]  he just threw away your right to a jury trial.
[01:25:15.960 --> 01:25:20.960]  And then when you insist he does it right, he has to get taken off the case,
[01:25:20.960 --> 01:25:24.960]  but all your rights have already been waived.
[01:25:24.960 --> 01:25:29.960]  And a new lawyer is not going to get them back.
[01:25:29.960 --> 01:25:36.960]  Well, it's kind of unusual and awkward because I'm at the stage where I'm totally, you know, going for sentencing.
[01:25:36.960 --> 01:25:41.960]  And I can email the lawyer, admit it, fault that you can't spend something that doesn't exist,
[01:25:41.960 --> 01:25:44.960]  but I've been convicted off of what you did in the process.
[01:25:44.960 --> 01:25:47.960]  You convinced this way, this jury with false misleading information.
[01:25:47.960 --> 01:25:52.960]  They found me guilty on driving on a suspended license, you know.
[01:25:52.960 --> 01:25:56.960]  And I do plan to do what you told me, you know, last week about the, you know, the bar agreement form.
[01:25:56.960 --> 01:26:00.960]  I mean, I thought you said in that email that they dropped the charge
[01:26:00.960 --> 01:26:04.960]  because they couldn't do something to something that didn't exist.
[01:26:04.960 --> 01:26:06.960]  Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
[01:26:06.960 --> 01:26:09.960]  But still, he's already established that through the trial.
[01:26:09.960 --> 01:26:14.960]  He established that the license doesn't exist, but it's suspended.
[01:26:14.960 --> 01:26:17.960]  Right. That's what he was establishing.
[01:26:17.960 --> 01:26:20.960]  No, he was basically saying, you know, that I had a suspended license.
[01:26:20.960 --> 01:26:22.960]  But the bar agreement, that's where it all came from.
[01:26:22.960 --> 01:26:29.960]  Okay. Did you object and challenge that they produced this allegedly suspended license?
[01:26:29.960 --> 01:26:34.960]  Yeah. Well, yeah. Like I said, they perpetrated fraud.
[01:26:34.960 --> 01:26:39.960]  Okay. Then you have the right to demand a judgment.
[01:26:39.960 --> 01:26:46.960]  Let's see. What's it called?
[01:26:46.960 --> 01:26:51.960]  A judgment, something in spite of the verdict.
[01:26:51.960 --> 01:26:54.960]  J-V-O-D, I think is what it is, or something like that.
[01:26:54.960 --> 01:26:55.960]  Yeah. That's what I plan to do.
[01:26:55.960 --> 01:26:59.960]  And I got all the things documented in there, judgment, that was standing the verdict.
[01:26:59.960 --> 01:27:02.960]  Exactly. Judgment not withstanding the verdict. Right.
[01:27:02.960 --> 01:27:05.960]  Yeah. I didn't get there yet because when I gave them the, you know,
[01:27:05.960 --> 01:27:08.960]  fine the fast inclusion law, which is from, you know,
[01:27:08.960 --> 01:27:13.960]  what I got from you from the traffic seminar, that kind of put things out of hold.
[01:27:13.960 --> 01:27:18.960]  You see, you read this? You see this?
[01:27:18.960 --> 01:27:19.960]  So they didn't expect that.
[01:27:19.960 --> 01:27:22.960]  Yeah. You know, denied unopposed motions and things like that.
[01:27:22.960 --> 01:27:25.960]  But you like to file a lot of papers.
[01:27:25.960 --> 01:27:27.960]  And I wouldn't advise you to file anything more.
[01:27:27.960 --> 01:27:32.960]  That's why you need to get a lawyer because, you know, some errors in your filing.
[01:27:32.960 --> 01:27:36.960]  No, no, no. What there is is there's stuff in your filings that will hang us
[01:27:36.960 --> 01:27:40.960]  if we continue in what we're doing and you keep objecting to it.
[01:27:40.960 --> 01:27:44.960]  That's what they're telling you in code.
[01:27:44.960 --> 01:27:53.960]  Okay. So I thought I was unusually quiet, didn't object to anything, just sitting there.
[01:27:53.960 --> 01:27:55.960]  Well, think about this.
[01:27:55.960 --> 01:27:59.960]  A friend of mine and I had a discussion about this and it couldn't be more true.
[01:27:59.960 --> 01:28:01.960]  But think about this.
[01:28:01.960 --> 01:28:07.960]  When the other side, who is the one that is moving against you,
[01:28:07.960 --> 01:28:12.960]  raises no objections and files no rebuttals to your paperwork,
[01:28:12.960 --> 01:28:16.960]  yet the judge denies them out of hand,
[01:28:16.960 --> 01:28:23.960]  despite them not being challenged in any way by the opposing party,
[01:28:23.960 --> 01:28:29.960]  how then can it not be said that the judge is acting in collusion
[01:28:29.960 --> 01:28:32.960]  with the prosecution against the accused?
[01:28:32.960 --> 01:28:38.960]  Because the first rule here is you file a document that runs unopposed
[01:28:38.960 --> 01:28:40.960]  as far as a motion and a pleading,
[01:28:40.960 --> 01:28:46.960]  then it stands the way it is until it's opposed.
[01:28:46.960 --> 01:28:53.960]  If the judge rules on it without it being opposed, then he's the only one opposing it.
[01:28:53.960 --> 01:28:57.960]  Therefore, he is acting in place of the prosecution.
[01:28:57.960 --> 01:29:02.960]  There is no fair and impartial trial here.
[01:29:02.960 --> 01:29:11.960]  See, when it comes to proceeds, the prosecution absolutely refuses to file the first piece of paperwork.
[01:29:11.960 --> 01:29:16.960]  They don't file anything opposing anything you file, no matter how dead on it is.
[01:29:16.960 --> 01:29:19.960]  Doesn't even matter if an actual attorney wrote it for you.
[01:29:19.960 --> 01:29:22.960]  They ignore it as if it was never filed.
[01:29:22.960 --> 01:29:27.960]  The court rules against it as if the other side opposed it with better arguments,
[01:29:27.960 --> 01:29:29.960]  and it didn't happen.
[01:29:29.960 --> 01:29:32.960]  And yet the judge rules against you.
[01:29:32.960 --> 01:29:36.960]  There is no fair and impartial here.
[01:29:36.960 --> 01:29:38.960]  I agree.
[01:29:38.960 --> 01:29:40.960]  So you need to be making those arguments, man.
[01:29:40.960 --> 01:29:43.960]  Hang on just a second, we're going to go to break, all right?
[01:29:43.960 --> 01:29:44.960]  Okay.
[01:29:44.960 --> 01:29:50.960]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:50.960 --> 01:29:53.960]  Give us a call, give us a holler, give us a clink, give us a comment.
[01:29:53.960 --> 01:29:56.960]  Give us something to work with until we get done with Jimmy and our next caller.
[01:29:56.960 --> 01:29:59.960]  We'll be right back.
[01:29:59.960 --> 01:30:06.960]  Cheerleading can exploit young girls, especially when their uniforms are more suitable for a brothel than a ball field.
[01:30:06.960 --> 01:30:13.960]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment to tell you about one high school squad that wants a little more respect.
[01:30:13.960 --> 01:30:20.960]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:20.960 --> 01:30:21.960]  That's creepy.
[01:30:21.960 --> 01:30:23.960]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:23.960 --> 01:30:26.960]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:26.960 --> 01:30:33.960]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:33.960 --> 01:30:37.960]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:37.960 --> 01:30:40.960]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:40.960 --> 01:30:43.960]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:43.960 --> 01:30:45.960]  Cheerleading has always been sexist.
[01:30:45.960 --> 01:30:50.960]  Cue girls turning cartwheels in support of buff male athletes is a time-worn tradition.
[01:30:50.960 --> 01:30:57.960]  But many uniforms put the emphasis more on titillation than teamwork, and some cheerleaders are demanding more respect.
[01:30:57.960 --> 01:31:01.960]  A Connecticut high school squad recently got up the nerve to ask for more coverage.
[01:31:01.960 --> 01:31:08.960]  They said their tight short shorts and crop tops were embarrassing and inappropriate, and now their school board is scrambling for a fix.
[01:31:08.960 --> 01:31:18.960]  Experts say girls required to wear skimpy midriff-bearing cheerleading outfits are at risk for poor body image and eating disorders, which affect thousands of cheerleaders nationwide.
[01:31:18.960 --> 01:31:23.960]  So here's three cheers for the Connecticut girls who said enough is enough.
[01:31:23.960 --> 01:31:29.960]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:29.960 --> 01:31:35.960]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:35.960 --> 01:31:37.960]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:37.960 --> 01:31:42.960]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:42.960 --> 01:31:47.960]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:47.960 --> 01:31:49.960]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:49.960 --> 01:31:50.960]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:50.960 --> 01:31:51.960]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:51.960 --> 01:31:52.960]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:52.960 --> 01:31:54.960]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:54.960 --> 01:31:57.960]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.960 --> 01:32:00.960]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.960 --> 01:32:09.960]  At HempUSA.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world, detoxifying, self-healing, while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:32:09.960 --> 01:32:14.960]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest selling product, micro plant powder.
[01:32:14.960 --> 01:32:24.960]  Our micro plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc, and silica to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:32:24.960 --> 01:32:29.960]  Micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:32:29.960 --> 01:32:33.960]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at HempUSA.org.
[01:32:33.960 --> 01:32:36.960]  And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:32:36.960 --> 01:32:42.960]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:32:42.960 --> 01:32:45.960]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:32:45.960 --> 01:32:52.960]  Please visit us at HempUSA.org or call 908-691-2608.
[01:32:52.960 --> 01:32:55.960]  That's 908-691-2608.
[01:32:55.960 --> 01:33:00.960]  See what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you at HempUSA.org.
[01:33:00.960 --> 01:33:12.960]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:30.960 --> 01:33:38.960]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:33:38.960 --> 01:33:42.960]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking with Jimmy in Maryland.
[01:33:42.960 --> 01:33:45.960]  All right, Jimmy, let's go ahead and get this wrapped up.
[01:33:45.960 --> 01:33:46.960]  Okay.
[01:33:46.960 --> 01:33:55.960]  I was thinking when the prosecutor got up and pleaded that he, of his errors that he made in open court about I should not have been cited on a suspended license,
[01:33:55.960 --> 01:34:05.960]  appropriate charge that I should have been driving on a license, I'm wondering if I can use that to open up the case that I'm besting your Supreme Court now that I'm appealing.
[01:34:05.960 --> 01:34:08.960]  Well, the thing about it is, is here's their problem.
[01:34:08.960 --> 01:34:20.960]  They've already jeopardy attached on that charge and out of the same instance, the same incident, so they can't come back on that charge after this one gets dropped because it's double jeopardy.
[01:34:20.960 --> 01:34:40.960]  And your motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, that admission right there to the appellate court will get it overturned because the prosecutor admitted that the charge was not valid and the grounds on the reason it was not valid.
[01:34:40.960 --> 01:34:41.960]  Okay.
[01:34:41.960 --> 01:34:43.960]  And that would be exactly it.
[01:34:43.960 --> 01:34:48.960]  The prosecutor is attempting to charge me with a legal impossibility.
[01:34:48.960 --> 01:34:52.960]  And that can't happen.
[01:34:52.960 --> 01:35:00.960]  The law cannot order or punish for the impossible.
[01:35:00.960 --> 01:35:02.960]  Right.
[01:35:02.960 --> 01:35:11.960]  Even though I keep saying that, you know, I told you what the other courts were saying that there's no showing in my case and it's not in the public interest.
[01:35:11.960 --> 01:35:13.960]  That's what I keep getting.
[01:35:13.960 --> 01:35:16.960]  I didn't want to address it.
[01:35:16.960 --> 01:35:22.960]  Well, you certainly can state that there's a public interest, a legal issue.
[01:35:22.960 --> 01:35:34.960]  Can members, can the general public be charged falsely in these courts for the commission of an offense that is in of itself a legal impossibility?
[01:35:34.960 --> 01:35:38.960]  That would be in the public interest to know the answer to, wouldn't it?
[01:35:38.960 --> 01:35:39.960]  Yes, it would.
[01:35:39.960 --> 01:35:41.960]  I think so.
[01:35:41.960 --> 01:35:46.960]  So, put that in as one of your legal issues.
[01:35:46.960 --> 01:35:51.960]  Let me ask you, but there's something driving out a license now.
[01:35:51.960 --> 01:35:57.960]  I was reading something about the statute of limitations saying you got to bring that issue up at the very beginning as the answer.
[01:35:57.960 --> 01:36:00.960]  If you don't, then you cannot bring that up later on.
[01:36:00.960 --> 01:36:02.960]  Do you know anything about that?
[01:36:02.960 --> 01:36:05.960]  Not without reading what your statute and case law says on it.
[01:36:05.960 --> 01:36:06.960]  No.
[01:36:06.960 --> 01:36:12.960]  Well, I was reading online the definitions of statute of limitations.
[01:36:12.960 --> 01:36:15.960]  They didn't put no citings.
[01:36:15.960 --> 01:36:17.960]  They just, you know, just said...
[01:36:17.960 --> 01:36:19.960]  Well, the statute, well, don't go by that.
[01:36:19.960 --> 01:36:32.960]  If whatever you're reading does not provide actual verifiable references to what the courts and the law recognizes as the authority, don't believe it.
[01:36:32.960 --> 01:36:33.960]  Okay.
[01:36:33.960 --> 01:36:37.960]  You have to find something that is considered authoritative.
[01:36:37.960 --> 01:36:50.960]  That's why when I tell people to look at definitions in Black's law, I just slap my palm to my forehead when they say, well, I went in and I told them, I hereby demand you take notice of Black's law.
[01:36:50.960 --> 01:36:53.960]  I'm going like, no, stupid.
[01:36:53.960 --> 01:37:07.960]  I hereby demand you take notice of the case of such-and-such as used to establish the definition of the term such-and-such as shown in Black's law.
[01:37:07.960 --> 01:37:09.960]  But Black's law is not the authority.
[01:37:09.960 --> 01:37:14.960]  The case law that established the definition is the authority.
[01:37:14.960 --> 01:37:15.960]  Okay.
[01:37:15.960 --> 01:37:22.960]  Well, at least I need to find case law that basically discusses about the cause of action expired.
[01:37:22.960 --> 01:37:23.960]  Yeah.
[01:37:23.960 --> 01:37:29.960]  Not only the cause of action expired, but what constitutes a public interest for your right to the appeal.
[01:37:29.960 --> 01:37:32.960]  Yeah.
[01:37:32.960 --> 01:37:38.960]  You can't be convicted on a legal impossibility or on a law that doesn't exist.
[01:37:38.960 --> 01:37:39.960]  Right.
[01:37:39.960 --> 01:37:44.960]  Or anything that creates a combination of the two.
[01:37:44.960 --> 01:37:46.960]  Yes.
[01:37:46.960 --> 01:37:52.960]  So I'm going to have to do some modifications with my, well, that modification is amended.
[01:37:52.960 --> 01:37:56.960]  We're going to have to amend the Petition for Rehearing.
[01:37:56.960 --> 01:37:57.960]  Correct.
[01:37:57.960 --> 01:38:02.960]  And also I'm going to have to do the other one, the ground law license.
[01:38:02.960 --> 01:38:05.960]  I'm moving that to the U.S. Supreme Court.
[01:38:05.960 --> 01:38:08.960]  And that one, that's a spin license.
[01:38:08.960 --> 01:38:09.960]  It's without a license.
[01:38:09.960 --> 01:38:17.960]  So I'm going to have to use that big lack of capacity to vote jurisdiction because the cause of action has expired.
[01:38:17.960 --> 01:38:18.960]  Right.
[01:38:18.960 --> 01:38:19.960]  All right.
[01:38:19.960 --> 01:38:20.960]  Go get them.
[01:38:20.960 --> 01:38:21.960]  All right.
[01:38:21.960 --> 01:38:22.960]  All right.
[01:38:22.960 --> 01:38:23.960]  Appreciate you.
[01:38:23.960 --> 01:38:24.960]  Thank you so much.
[01:38:24.960 --> 01:38:25.960]  So you don't recommend I get a lawyer?
[01:38:25.960 --> 01:38:26.960]  I didn't say that.
[01:38:26.960 --> 01:38:31.960]  I simply said that the court cannot order you to get one against your will.
[01:38:31.960 --> 01:38:36.960]  Now, me personally, what I do is geared to teach people to survive without a lawyer.
[01:38:36.960 --> 01:38:42.960]  And I would hate to see somebody that knows what they're doing to hinder themselves by getting one.
[01:38:42.960 --> 01:38:43.960]  Right.
[01:38:43.960 --> 01:38:50.960]  And I most certainly know that they will act to sabotage anything you've done once they're in the driver's seat.
[01:38:50.960 --> 01:38:53.960]  I've watched them do it.
[01:38:53.960 --> 01:38:54.960]  Okay.
[01:38:54.960 --> 01:39:02.960]  Well, they're really trying to vote that fair intimidation that I'm going to do jail time off a driver without a license, something that's minor, that's not even a jailable offense.
[01:39:02.960 --> 01:39:03.960]  Well, that's just it.
[01:39:03.960 --> 01:39:06.960]  They can't do that if it's not a jailable offense.
[01:39:06.960 --> 01:39:12.960]  They can't revoke your probation on it unless the terms of your probation deal specifically with Class Cs.
[01:39:12.960 --> 01:39:19.960]  And I don't know of any state that does that.
[01:39:19.960 --> 01:39:20.960]  All right.
[01:39:20.960 --> 01:39:21.960]  All right, Eddie.
[01:39:21.960 --> 01:39:22.960]  I'll keep you posted, man.
[01:39:22.960 --> 01:39:23.960]  All right, Jimmy.
[01:39:23.960 --> 01:39:24.960]  Good luck.
[01:39:24.960 --> 01:39:25.960]  Thanks a lot.
[01:39:25.960 --> 01:39:26.960]  All right.
[01:39:26.960 --> 01:39:27.960]  Bye-bye.
[01:39:27.960 --> 01:39:28.960]  All right.
[01:39:28.960 --> 01:39:29.960]  Now we're going to go to Larry in Arizona.
[01:39:29.960 --> 01:39:31.960]  Larry, what can I do for you?
[01:39:31.960 --> 01:39:33.960]  Good evening, Eddie.
[01:39:33.960 --> 01:39:45.960]  The very first part of this year, my wife called in and was asking you some questions because a couple of deputies had come in the week before, come past a no trespassing sign.
[01:39:45.960 --> 01:39:58.960]  When they came in, one of them pulled his AR on me, and you told her to go through and find the statutes, and we found some statutes that they violated.
[01:39:58.960 --> 01:40:14.960]  So one question is, our no trespassing sign specifically says that it's a violation of Title 18, USC 18, 241, and 242.
[01:40:14.960 --> 01:40:17.960]  Can I charge that those violations?
[01:40:17.960 --> 01:40:18.960]  No.
[01:40:18.960 --> 01:40:19.960]  Those are federal statutes.
[01:40:19.960 --> 01:40:21.960]  You can't charge under them at all.
[01:40:21.960 --> 01:40:22.960]  They're federal.
[01:40:22.960 --> 01:40:25.960]  You can complain to the DOJ, and they can charge them.
[01:40:25.960 --> 01:40:30.960]  You can complain to the U.S. attorney, and they can charge them, but you can't.
[01:40:30.960 --> 01:40:31.960]  Okay.
[01:40:31.960 --> 01:40:39.960]  Now, when I said statutes, I don't think I was referring, if I'm recalling any of this at all, I don't think I was referring to the federal stuff.
[01:40:39.960 --> 01:40:45.960]  I was referring to what the law is in Arizona.
[01:40:45.960 --> 01:40:47.960]  Yes, I'm pretty sure you did.
[01:40:47.960 --> 01:40:51.960]  I just wanted to clarify that to make sure that I knew where I was standing.
[01:40:51.960 --> 01:40:57.960]  Yeah, you need to find out what laws they violated in Arizona and start there.
[01:40:57.960 --> 01:41:01.960]  Now, that doesn't mean that you cannot simultaneously complain to the Fed.
[01:41:01.960 --> 01:41:09.960]  You can, and I would, because the moment that officer pointed his gun at you without cause, that was a felony.
[01:41:09.960 --> 01:41:12.960]  That is aggravated assault.
[01:41:12.960 --> 01:41:15.960]  That's a felony.
[01:41:15.960 --> 01:41:23.960]  And that is exactly the kind of stuff the DOJ goes after, because that is not only aggravated assault, it is excessive force.
[01:41:23.960 --> 01:41:26.960]  Okay.
[01:41:26.960 --> 01:41:31.960]  And the other thing I wanted to hit him with was criminal trespass.
[01:41:31.960 --> 01:41:35.960]  There may not be a way to do that at the federal level.
[01:41:35.960 --> 01:41:39.960]  That's why I said check what's going on with the trespass statutes at the state level.
[01:41:39.960 --> 01:41:42.960]  Yeah, no, you're correct.
[01:41:42.960 --> 01:41:45.960]  I found two state statutes.
[01:41:45.960 --> 01:41:50.960]  One is aggravated assault and one is an aggravated felony.
[01:41:50.960 --> 01:41:54.960]  But then also at the state level, I want to do the criminal trespass.
[01:41:54.960 --> 01:42:01.960]  But when I talk to the sergeant about it, he tells me, he says, you can't charge him with criminal trespass.
[01:42:01.960 --> 01:42:05.960]  Oh, Bologna, if you can't, if it was posted property, they didn't have a warrant,
[01:42:05.960 --> 01:42:11.960]  and they were not called onto that property by someone with the authority to get them on the property
[01:42:11.960 --> 01:42:20.960]  and if someone did not or reported an actual crime in progress on that property, they cannot enter it.
[01:42:20.960 --> 01:42:26.960]  That's, I mean, the statute says they have to come under lawful authority.
[01:42:26.960 --> 01:42:28.960]  Correct.
[01:42:28.960 --> 01:42:33.960]  And those things I just described are the only things that would give them that.
[01:42:33.960 --> 01:42:39.960]  That they saw or had news of a felony in progress.
[01:42:39.960 --> 01:42:51.960]  They had a valid warrant or they were called onto the property by someone who had the authority to admit them to the property.
[01:42:51.960 --> 01:42:53.960]  That's where their lawful authority comes from.
[01:42:53.960 --> 01:42:58.960]  Until one of those things existed, they had none.
[01:42:58.960 --> 01:42:59.960]  Yeah, okay.
[01:42:59.960 --> 01:43:03.960]  Well, I mean, the sergeant told me they had lawful authority because they had a badge.
[01:43:03.960 --> 01:43:07.960]  No, that sergeant is full of crap.
[01:43:07.960 --> 01:43:12.960]  I know that is. Okay, so the sergeant refuses to take a complaint.
[01:43:12.960 --> 01:43:13.960]  So who?
[01:43:13.960 --> 01:43:16.960]  The county or district attorney.
[01:43:16.960 --> 01:43:22.960]  The county, district attorney or any judicial magistrate.
[01:43:22.960 --> 01:43:23.960]  Okay.
[01:43:23.960 --> 01:43:25.960]  Now, I'm assuming the magistrate.
[01:43:25.960 --> 01:43:30.960]  Here in Texas, you can make it before any magistrate or the county or district attorney.
[01:43:30.960 --> 01:43:36.960]  You'd have to see exactly who's authorized to take complaints from the public in Arizona.
[01:43:36.960 --> 01:43:39.960]  You can go to the county sheriff, you know, and do it.
[01:43:39.960 --> 01:43:44.960]  Or you can go directly to your grand jury and do it.
[01:43:44.960 --> 01:43:45.960]  Okay.
[01:43:45.960 --> 01:43:46.960]  All right.
[01:43:46.960 --> 01:43:47.960]  Hang on just a second, Larry.
[01:43:47.960 --> 01:43:48.960]  We're about to take a break.
[01:43:48.960 --> 01:43:50.960]  So I'll finish this up when we get back.
[01:43:50.960 --> 01:43:52.960]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:52.960 --> 01:43:53.960]  We will be right back.
[01:43:53.960 --> 01:43:55.960]  And I'll try to get everybody that's on the board.
[01:43:55.960 --> 01:43:59.960]  So y'all hang in there.
[01:43:59.960 --> 01:44:03.960]  Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:03.960 --> 01:44:04.960]  Sorry.
[01:44:04.960 --> 01:44:07.960]  I'm used by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve.
[01:44:07.960 --> 01:44:08.960]  What?
[01:44:07.960 --> 01:44:12.960]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.960 --> 01:44:14.960]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt.
[01:44:14.960 --> 01:44:18.960]  And like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:18.960 --> 01:44:24.960]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:24.960 --> 01:44:28.960]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity.
[01:44:28.960 --> 01:44:29.960]  But there is hope.
[01:44:29.960 --> 01:44:35.960]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:35.960 --> 01:44:42.960]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:42.960 --> 01:44:54.960]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.960 --> 01:45:00.960]  The benefits from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:00.960 --> 01:45:03.960]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.960 --> 01:45:15.960]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.960 --> 01:45:18.960]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.960 --> 01:45:22.960]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.960 --> 01:45:27.960]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.960 --> 01:45:33.960]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.960 --> 01:45:42.960]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.960 --> 01:45:51.960]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.960 --> 01:46:00.960]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:21.960 --> 01:46:29.960]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:29.960 --> 01:46:33.960]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking to Larry in Arizona.
[01:46:33.960 --> 01:46:35.960]  Carol, Joe, y'all hang on.
[01:46:35.960 --> 01:46:37.960]  If I can get to you before I'm out of time, I will.
[01:46:37.960 --> 01:46:39.960]  All right, Larry, go ahead.
[01:46:39.960 --> 01:46:43.960]  Okay, Eddie, let me get out here in a hurry.
[01:46:43.960 --> 01:46:50.960]  Just in relation to the first part of your show, you're talking about everybody is ignoring the law.
[01:46:50.960 --> 01:47:02.960]  I'm curious, Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Federal Constitution says there will be no direct taxes unless they're apportioned.
[01:47:02.960 --> 01:47:05.960]  Our property taxes are direct taxes.
[01:47:05.960 --> 01:47:10.960]  No, the Federal Constitution is talking about the federal government.
[01:47:10.960 --> 01:47:14.960]  It is not talking about the state government, okay?
[01:47:14.960 --> 01:47:24.960]  Most people have been indoctrinated or haven't bothered to understand the limits of federal application of their statutes and jurisdiction.
[01:47:24.960 --> 01:47:30.960]  That's part of the idiocy in the Texas legislature calling every federal enactment a valid law in the state.
[01:47:30.960 --> 01:47:32.960]  It's not.
[01:47:32.960 --> 01:47:44.960]  Federal jurisdiction does not apply to the states except in the areas where the Federal Constitution specifically gave them authority to act within the states.
[01:47:44.960 --> 01:47:56.960]  And it didn't do that in any areas, especially criminal, except for what is in the 18 enumerated powers, okay?
[01:47:56.960 --> 01:48:06.960]  The only one of those that could even begin to be used to touch the people of the states is the Interstate Commerce Clause, all right?
[01:48:06.960 --> 01:48:11.960]  Got nothing to do with the taxation portion except by the apportionment clause.
[01:48:11.960 --> 01:48:16.960]  But that is to tax the state, not the people in it.
[01:48:16.960 --> 01:48:26.960]  The federal government can only tax the states or what the income tax code says they can tax, and that is not you and me. It's never been you and me.
[01:48:26.960 --> 01:48:30.960]  Your property taxes are a different issue.
[01:48:30.960 --> 01:48:36.960]  It's whether or not you have authorized your people to tax you.
[01:48:36.960 --> 01:48:43.960]  Because if they can tax you without your consent, then you don't own what they're taxing, right?
[01:48:43.960 --> 01:48:44.960]  Okay, I'll agree.
[01:48:44.960 --> 01:48:52.960]  That authority is given to them by you and only you and what you agreed to within your particular state constitution.
[01:48:52.960 --> 01:48:57.960]  Got nothing to do with the Federal Constitution when it comes to property taxes.
[01:48:57.960 --> 01:49:02.960]  Okay.
[01:49:02.960 --> 01:49:05.960]  How do we revoke our permission, or can we?
[01:49:05.960 --> 01:49:08.960]  Well, that's the question of the decade, isn't it?
[01:49:08.960 --> 01:49:20.960]  Because if the people hold all the political power, then any one of the people should be able to say, you don't have any that I've given you, so leave me alone.
[01:49:20.960 --> 01:49:24.960]  That would seem about right, but it's not what the government wants.
[01:49:24.960 --> 01:49:31.960]  The government doesn't want to give up its power, especially since it has a monopoly on the use of force.
[01:49:31.960 --> 01:49:42.960]  So it will use force to keep the power, whether you want them to have it or not, and despite the fact that the Constitution says you have the right to take it away.
[01:49:42.960 --> 01:49:56.960]  Because I have never seen a government in an entire history of man that has ever willingly given up one iota of power that it has stolen.
[01:49:56.960 --> 01:49:58.960]  Okay.
[01:49:58.960 --> 01:50:02.960]  Well, I thank you for your time, and I'll let you get on with your other callers.
[01:50:02.960 --> 01:50:03.960]  All right.
[01:50:03.960 --> 01:50:04.960]  Thanks for calling, Larry.
[01:50:04.960 --> 01:50:05.960]  Okay. Bye.
[01:50:05.960 --> 01:50:06.960]  Bye.
[01:50:06.960 --> 01:50:07.960]  All right.
[01:50:07.960 --> 01:50:08.960]  Now we're going to go to Carol in Maine.
[01:50:08.960 --> 01:50:10.960]  Carol, what can we do for you?
[01:50:10.960 --> 01:50:11.960]  Hi.
[01:50:11.960 --> 01:50:19.960]  I'd like to know what is required if there's an arrest warrant out for a person that they don't know about.
[01:50:19.960 --> 01:50:30.960]  They're in a different town, and two cops come up to them inside a store and tell them there's an arrest warrant, but there's no paperwork whatsoever.
[01:50:30.960 --> 01:50:33.960]  What do they actually require legally?
[01:50:33.960 --> 01:50:40.960]  There was a time when the officer was required to have the warrant in their possession in order to make the arrest,
[01:50:40.960 --> 01:50:50.960]  and the person was authorized to resist that arrest by any means necessary if the officer could not produce evidence of lawful authority to make that arrest.
[01:50:50.960 --> 01:50:54.960]  So it's the same thing as if they're...
[01:50:54.960 --> 01:50:55.960]  No, no, no.
[01:50:55.960 --> 01:50:56.960]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:50:56.960 --> 01:50:58.960]  Now this is the way that it was once upheld.
[01:50:58.960 --> 01:51:01.960]  They've completely changed the way they're upholding it now.
[01:51:01.960 --> 01:51:07.960]  Once again, that usurpation of power that we didn't give them, but they've silently taken over time.
[01:51:07.960 --> 01:51:10.960]  Now the rule is we can arrest you.
[01:51:10.960 --> 01:51:17.960]  We don't even have to tell you why we're arresting you until later some magistrate can tell you.
[01:51:17.960 --> 01:51:21.960]  And if we decide to show you that we had lawful authority, we'll do so.
[01:51:21.960 --> 01:51:31.960]  And if we won't, we'll still cause you to post money that you shouldn't have to pay to get out so that we can determine later we shouldn't have arrested you in the first place.
[01:51:31.960 --> 01:51:34.960]  See how clear and direct that is?
[01:51:34.960 --> 01:51:42.960]  So in other words, my understanding though was the police didn't have the power to arrest anyone, that it had to be a sheriff or a deputy sheriff.
[01:51:42.960 --> 01:51:49.960]  Well, again, what powers are given to police officers by the legislature in your particular state?
[01:51:49.960 --> 01:51:51.960]  That's the question of the day.
[01:51:51.960 --> 01:52:03.960]  So here in Texas, they have decreed unlawfully, in my opinion, that police officers, municipal cops, are law enforcement, yet there's no constitutional authority for them as law enforcement.
[01:52:03.960 --> 01:52:09.960]  The only law enforcement officers our Constitution authorizes is the sheriffs and the constables.
[01:52:09.960 --> 01:52:10.960]  That's it.
[01:52:10.960 --> 01:52:11.960]  There are no others.
[01:52:11.960 --> 01:52:23.960]  DPS and all these other militarized police agencies that the state and cities are using is in fact a violation of the federal Constitution because they are now the standing army that it forbids.
[01:52:23.960 --> 01:52:33.960]  But the point is that even if they had the authority to arrest, they have always been required to make that authority known.
[01:52:33.960 --> 01:52:39.960]  They say they have a warrant, but they never produce it, and half the time that is a total lie.
[01:52:39.960 --> 01:52:41.960]  They never had it in the first place.
[01:52:41.960 --> 01:53:01.960]  Supposedly it was on computer, but I happen to know, because it's me, that the federal court had two months prior dismissed the contempt of court charge, and yet I was arrested with no paperwork, nothing put in handcuffs.
[01:53:01.960 --> 01:53:06.960]  Did you get a release or an order rescinding that from the federal court?
[01:53:06.960 --> 01:53:14.960]  I got paperwork from the judge saying on his order that he dismissed everything in the case.
[01:53:14.960 --> 01:53:15.960]  Okay.
[01:53:15.960 --> 01:53:18.960]  And was that what the warrant allegedly applied to?
[01:53:18.960 --> 01:53:22.960]  Well, no, it's kind of a bizarre case.
[01:53:22.960 --> 01:53:26.960]  The contempt of court started in the state court.
[01:53:26.960 --> 01:53:28.960]  I removed it to federal court.
[01:53:28.960 --> 01:53:43.960]  The state judge, believe it or not, ruled that the USC code, he wasn't going to accept it, even though the Congress has passed a thing saying the state must go by USC code.
[01:53:43.960 --> 01:53:45.960]  I have the code.
[01:53:45.960 --> 01:53:52.960]  He therefore tried to keep it, but it was already entered and docketed in the federal court.
[01:53:52.960 --> 01:53:54.960]  He ignored that fact.
[01:53:54.960 --> 01:53:59.960]  He gave away property that belonged to me that had been taken without a warrant.
[01:53:59.960 --> 01:54:05.960]  Did the federal judge grant you any relief from that state judge's actions in his order?
[01:54:05.960 --> 01:54:06.960]  No.
[01:54:06.960 --> 01:54:10.960]  He simply dismissed everything that was filed in his court.
[01:54:10.960 --> 01:54:11.960]  Okay.
[01:54:11.960 --> 01:54:17.960]  He dismissed everything filed in the federal judge's court or in the state judge's court?
[01:54:17.960 --> 01:54:20.960]  In the federal judge's court, the removed case.
[01:54:20.960 --> 01:54:21.960]  All right.
[01:54:21.960 --> 01:54:22.960]  Here's your problem.
[01:54:22.960 --> 01:54:30.960]  First off, if that was an issue at the state level, what were you claiming gave the federal court jurisdiction of it?
[01:54:30.960 --> 01:54:37.960]  Because unless you can show it was depriving you of a federally protected right, they don't have any jurisdiction over it.
[01:54:37.960 --> 01:54:38.960]  Yes, I did show that.
[01:54:38.960 --> 01:54:39.960]  Okay.
[01:54:39.960 --> 01:54:42.960]  But the federal judge dismissed it from his court.
[01:54:42.960 --> 01:54:47.960]  He didn't issue an order saying that the state level issue was dismissed, did he?
[01:54:47.960 --> 01:54:48.960]  No.
[01:54:48.960 --> 01:54:49.960]  What happened?
[01:54:49.960 --> 01:54:51.960]  It's more complex than that.
[01:54:51.960 --> 01:54:52.960]  This has been going on for...
[01:54:52.960 --> 01:54:53.960]  Well, wait, wait, wait.
[01:54:53.960 --> 01:54:59.960]  It may be complex in how everything works, but this particular portion is the way it is, and that's not going to change.
[01:54:59.960 --> 01:55:01.960]  I need an answer to that.
[01:55:01.960 --> 01:55:07.960]  The federal judge dismissed the action you filed in the federal court.
[01:55:07.960 --> 01:55:15.960]  He did not dismiss via his order anything pending in the state court, yes or no?
[01:55:15.960 --> 01:55:17.960]  He mentioned nothing about the state court.
[01:55:17.960 --> 01:55:18.960]  Okay.
[01:55:18.960 --> 01:55:22.960]  Then all he did was throw you back out the front door.
[01:55:22.960 --> 01:55:26.960]  He didn't stop the state from doing anything they were doing.
[01:55:26.960 --> 01:55:30.960]  That makes it that state court had a warrant out.
[01:55:30.960 --> 01:55:33.960]  That's exactly what you got arrested on.
[01:55:33.960 --> 01:55:38.960]  The federal court didn't do anything to prevent it or to order it dismissed.
[01:55:38.960 --> 01:55:43.960]  So in other words, I have to do what?
[01:55:43.960 --> 01:55:45.960]  Get back to the federal court and tell them to dismiss?
[01:55:45.960 --> 01:55:53.960]  Well, again, how are you going to get back to a federal court until you can show how they have jurisdiction to do anything in the case?
[01:55:53.960 --> 01:56:00.960]  Well, they have jurisdiction under 1441 and 1443 because I removed the case.
[01:56:00.960 --> 01:56:01.960]  No.
[01:56:01.960 --> 01:56:09.960]  You have to have a valid federal-powered reason to remove the case in the first place and make it stay.
[01:56:09.960 --> 01:56:11.960]  I did.
[01:56:11.960 --> 01:56:13.960]  Which was?
[01:56:13.960 --> 01:56:23.960]  They came out to my house without a warrant, without an affidavit, put me in handcuffs, stole property worth approximately $200,000.
[01:56:23.960 --> 01:56:25.960]  On what grounds?
[01:56:25.960 --> 01:56:29.960]  Told me I wasn't under arrest even though I was in handcuffs.
[01:56:29.960 --> 01:56:34.960]  What grounds did they use to take the property?
[01:56:34.960 --> 01:56:44.960]  That they had the right to because it was an issue from the state court had decided that it was a contempt of court issue and they came out and did all this.
[01:56:44.960 --> 01:56:51.960]  How does the state court use contempt of court to steal property?
[01:56:51.960 --> 01:56:57.960]  They've done it five times now, so like not just to me.
[01:56:57.960 --> 01:57:02.960]  Is this in any way related to a property tax issue?
[01:57:02.960 --> 01:57:03.960]  No.
[01:57:03.960 --> 01:57:05.960]  No.
[01:57:05.960 --> 01:57:07.960]  This was a contempt of court.
[01:57:07.960 --> 01:57:09.960]  Okay.
[01:57:09.960 --> 01:57:10.960]  All right.
[01:57:10.960 --> 01:57:16.960]  The thing is you don't get a contempt of court unless you're already in court for something else.
[01:57:16.960 --> 01:57:17.960]  Okay.
[01:57:17.960 --> 01:57:19.960]  I was in court in 2009.
[01:57:19.960 --> 01:57:23.960]  They claimed this was a contempt of court case.
[01:57:23.960 --> 01:57:27.960]  What were you in court in 2009 for?
[01:57:27.960 --> 01:57:38.960]  Because they claimed that in 2000, it goes back 10 years, they claimed in 2004 that it was an animal abuse issue.
[01:57:38.960 --> 01:57:45.960]  But at the time they came on my property, the only one who ever abused an animal was them.
[01:57:45.960 --> 01:57:47.960]  I had over $10,000 in vet bills.
[01:57:47.960 --> 01:57:52.960]  I was found guilty of no vet care for my animals.
[01:57:52.960 --> 01:57:54.960]  Okay.
[01:57:54.960 --> 01:57:56.960]  All right.
[01:57:56.960 --> 01:58:02.960]  That's someplace you might need to start with next time, so I have a better clue about what we're dealing with here.
[01:58:02.960 --> 01:58:06.960]  We need to resolve how that issue came about first when we get to the contempt thing,
[01:58:06.960 --> 01:58:12.960]  because those series of events are going to determine what you could and couldn't do in relation to federal court
[01:58:12.960 --> 01:58:14.960]  and whether or not what you did was proper.
[01:58:14.960 --> 01:58:16.960]  Okay.
[01:58:16.960 --> 01:58:23.960]  So if you really want to research that, call my co-host Randy on Friday from 8 to midnight, okay?
[01:58:23.960 --> 01:58:25.960]  Because he'll be happy to go into that with you.
[01:58:25.960 --> 01:58:26.960]  All right.
[01:58:26.960 --> 01:58:27.960]  Thanks for calling in, Carol.
[01:58:27.960 --> 01:58:28.960]  Yep.
[01:58:28.960 --> 01:58:29.960]  Bye-bye.
[01:58:29.960 --> 01:58:30.960]  Bye-bye.
[01:58:30.960 --> 01:58:31.960]  All right, folks.
[01:58:31.960 --> 01:58:33.960]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:33.960 --> 01:58:36.960]  Thank you so much for listening and for calling in.
[01:58:36.960 --> 01:58:38.960]  I appreciate all of you.
[01:58:38.960 --> 01:58:41.960]  Please keep us in your financial prayers and assistance.
[01:58:41.960 --> 01:58:45.960]  We can always use it, both personal and network-wise.
[01:58:45.960 --> 01:58:46.960]  Y'all have a blessed week.
[01:58:46.960 --> 01:58:56.960]  Good night and God bless.
[01:59:16.960 --> 01:59:41.960]  Thank you so much.
[01:59:46.960 --> 01:59:56.960]  Thank you.