[00:00.000 --> 00:07.800]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates, online
[00:07.800 --> 00:09.480]  at thelibertybeat.com.
[00:09.480 --> 00:13.880]  I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, March 2, 2015.
[00:13.880 --> 00:21.240]  Gold is trading at $1,213, silver at $16.60, and Bitcoin is trading around $259.
[00:21.240 --> 00:24.960]  The Liberty Beat is brought to you by Coinarch, offering innovative trading solutions for
[00:24.960 --> 00:25.960]  Bitcoin.
[00:25.960 --> 00:27.800]  Do more than just buy and sell Bitcoin.
[00:27.800 --> 00:31.440]  Use long and short positions to profit in rising and falling markets and boost your
[00:31.440 --> 00:33.120]  returns through leverage.
[00:33.120 --> 00:35.560]  Learn more at coinarch.com.
[00:35.560 --> 00:39.360]  In the news, on Sunday afternoon, the Los Angeles Police Department shot and killed
[00:39.360 --> 00:44.120]  a homeless man on the corner of E 6th Street and South San Pedro Street.
[00:44.120 --> 00:47.880]  The officers were reportedly responding to a call involving an altercation between two
[00:47.880 --> 00:50.600]  individuals when a struggle began.
[00:50.600 --> 00:55.160]  A video of the shooting shows two officers detaining one individual and four other officers
[00:55.160 --> 00:58.920]  holding down a man when one of the officers begins firing.
[00:58.920 --> 01:03.080]  The officer fires once, pauses, and then fires four more times.
[01:03.080 --> 01:05.640]  The man was pronounced dead at the scene.
[01:05.640 --> 01:12.640]  The Liberty Beat.com will keep you up to date with late breaking details on this story.
[01:12.640 --> 01:16.200]  The U.S. government continues to persecute the remaining members of the so-called Kettle
[01:16.200 --> 01:21.640]  Falls Five, who are accused of drug manufacturing related to a cannabis grill operation they
[01:21.640 --> 01:23.680]  say was for medicinal purposes.
[01:23.680 --> 01:28.520]  Today, the government is expected to end arguments in the Kettle Falls case, in which Rhonda
[01:28.520 --> 01:34.000]  Harvey, Rowan Gregg, and Michelle Gregg face drug manufacturing, distribution, conspiracy,
[01:34.000 --> 01:35.360]  and weapons charges.
[01:35.360 --> 01:37.920]  Two other defendants are no longer on trial.
[01:37.920 --> 01:42.080]  The judge has ruled that the defense cannot make mention of medical cannabis, a move to
[01:42.080 --> 01:45.220]  spark outrage in the medicinal cannabis community.
[01:45.220 --> 01:50.560]  The trial is expected to conclude this week.
[01:50.560 --> 01:54.600]  The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is currently accepting public comment on a
[01:54.600 --> 01:59.080]  draft version of a plan that would push American adults to receive current and retroactive
[01:59.080 --> 02:00.280]  vaccinations.
[02:00.280 --> 02:05.080]  The HHS is asking for the public's thoughts on its draft National Adult Immunization Plan
[02:05.080 --> 02:07.100]  until March 9th of this year.
[02:07.100 --> 02:12.600]  It could involve several dozen shots given to adults who need to catch up on vaccines.
[02:12.600 --> 02:17.120]  Support for Liberty Beat comes from My Magic Mud, detox fine tooth powder, the most effective
[02:17.120 --> 02:19.080]  and affordable dental care around.
[02:19.080 --> 02:21.880]  Get a $150 application jar at MyMagicMud.com.
[02:21.880 --> 02:25.320]  Looking to promote your business or cause to tens of thousands of loyal listeners?
[02:25.320 --> 02:29.760]  Well, for a limited time only, the Liberty Beat is offering you the chance to save big
[02:29.760 --> 02:31.440]  while spreading your message.
[02:31.440 --> 02:32.440]  It's simple.
[02:32.440 --> 02:36.320]  Just sign up for three months of advertising and get your fourth month free.
[02:36.320 --> 02:38.680]  Don't miss out on this unique opportunity.
[02:38.680 --> 02:44.540]  Just visit the LibertyBeat.com slash advertise and use coupon code GCN in the describe your
[02:44.540 --> 02:46.320]  company section.
[02:46.320 --> 02:50.880]  This is the Liberty Beat for Monday, March 2nd, 2015.
[02:50.880 --> 03:17.520]  Check out the website at the LibertyBeat.com.
[03:17.520 --> 03:45.320]  The Liberty Beat for Monday, March 2nd, 2015.
[03:45.320 --> 04:03.520]  Check out the website at the LibertyBeat.com slash advertise and use coupon code GCN in
[04:03.520 --> 04:28.120]  the describe your company section.
[04:28.120 --> 04:43.040]  Alright folks, good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host
[04:43.040 --> 04:44.040]  Eddie Craig.
[04:44.040 --> 04:45.040]  It is March 2nd, 2015.
[04:45.040 --> 04:46.040]  Another month gone by and we are rolling forward.
[04:46.040 --> 04:47.040]  The only problem is how close are we to the edge of the cliff and how fast are we actually
[04:47.040 --> 04:48.040]  going?
[04:48.040 --> 04:53.160]  You need to start looking around folks because I guarantee you what you think you know in
[04:53.160 --> 04:59.680]  that regard and what is reality are not coming together like you would want them to.
[04:59.680 --> 05:04.680]  We are headed at a very rapid rate for a cliff that we will never be able to stop in time
[05:04.680 --> 05:10.120]  for unless we do something drastic immediately.
[05:10.120 --> 05:14.040]  Drastic does not mean go out and start shooting people in the head, don't get me wrong.
[05:14.040 --> 05:21.440]  But if we don't get organized, get active and get out, we are in trouble.
[05:21.440 --> 05:30.080]  Now that being said, I want to go over a case that was sent to me today by someone in Nevada
[05:30.080 --> 05:36.960]  and this is basically a bench trial that they had in relation to a couple of traffic charges,
[05:36.960 --> 05:42.560]  one of them being no financial responsibility in Nevada and the other being an invalid license.
[05:42.560 --> 05:49.960]  Now the document I am going to read you is their attempt to get their appeal from this
[05:49.960 --> 05:51.160]  ruling.
[05:51.160 --> 05:55.560]  They did not contest the conviction on the driver's license issue.
[05:55.560 --> 06:02.220]  They're going after the contention related to the proof of financial responsibility issue.
[06:02.220 --> 06:06.960]  Now here in Texas, Nevada statute is very similar to the one here in Texas in what it
[06:06.960 --> 06:07.960]  does.
[06:07.960 --> 06:15.040]  The one here in Texas, 601.053 is absolutely unconstitutional on its face.
[06:15.040 --> 06:22.380]  It is reprehensible, not simply repugnant, it is absolutely reprehensible to due process.
[06:22.380 --> 06:26.360]  It does two very detrimental things to your rights.
[06:26.360 --> 06:34.240]  The statute specifically shifts the burden of proof to the accused, not the accuser.
[06:34.240 --> 06:39.720]  And it creates a predetermination of guilt over innocence.
[06:39.720 --> 06:43.500]  You are no longer innocent until proven guilty.
[06:43.500 --> 06:48.060]  You are guilty until you prove yourself innocent.
[06:48.060 --> 06:53.080]  That makes it absolutely reprehensible.
[06:53.080 --> 06:58.320]  The Nevada statute is very, very similar in that regard.
[06:58.320 --> 07:02.280]  Now what I want to do is I want to read some of the points that they put into their document
[07:02.280 --> 07:06.660]  and then I'm going to read my response to them on some of the points that I feel they
[07:06.660 --> 07:13.320]  could have clarified more and also included out of the ones they didn't.
[07:13.320 --> 07:19.160]  Now I'm going to leave out any personally identifying information to the person or to
[07:19.160 --> 07:20.160]  the case.
[07:20.160 --> 07:21.160]  All right.
[07:21.160 --> 07:22.760]  But this is not a fictional case.
[07:22.760 --> 07:25.320]  This is a case that was actually done in Nevada.
[07:25.320 --> 07:30.200]  But I'm going to leave out the relevant details that would make this person identifiable.
[07:30.200 --> 07:35.360]  So given that, I'm going to read it, but I'm going to leave out certain details here.
[07:35.360 --> 07:36.360]  All right.
[07:36.360 --> 07:42.800]  On a certain date, this individual was cited by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
[07:42.800 --> 07:52.600]  for violating NRS 483.550 driving without a valid driver's license and NRS 485.187 driving
[07:52.600 --> 07:54.360]  without insurance.
[07:54.360 --> 07:59.120]  The state of Nevada prosecuted the individual on both of the original counts during a bench
[07:59.120 --> 08:05.260]  trial in the Justice Court of Las Vegas Township on this date.
[08:05.260 --> 08:09.600]  At the conclusion of the trial, the individual was convicted on both counts.
[08:09.600 --> 08:14.080]  The individual's conviction for driving without a valid driver's license is not an issue in
[08:14.080 --> 08:15.080]  this appeal.
[08:15.080 --> 08:23.720]  As a result of the individual's conviction for violating NRS 485.187 no insurance, the
[08:23.720 --> 08:28.520]  individual was sentenced to 25 days in the Clark County Detention Center suspended for
[08:28.520 --> 08:38.180]  150 days, a $1,001 criminal fine, a $137 administrative assessment fee, and was ordered to stay out
[08:38.180 --> 08:40.920]  of trouble.
[08:40.920 --> 08:50.400]  NRS 485.187-1C states, no person shall fail or refuse to surrender upon demand to a peace
[08:50.400 --> 08:56.920]  officer or to an authorized representative of the department the evidence of insurance.
[08:56.920 --> 09:02.880]  At trial, the state presented testimony evidence that the individual did not surrender evidence
[09:02.880 --> 09:09.000]  of insurance when he was demanded to do so by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.
[09:09.000 --> 09:11.920]  And this is reference to their trial transcript.
[09:11.920 --> 09:17.080]  However, the individual contends the state may not compel such a surrender and appeals
[09:17.080 --> 09:22.120]  the trial court's adjudication of guilty based upon the convention that the conviction in
[09:22.120 --> 09:27.400]  this matter was the result of the trial court's failure to acknowledge the individual's protection
[09:27.400 --> 09:32.240]  against self-incrimination provided by Article 1, Section A to the Constitution of the State
[09:32.240 --> 09:38.280]  of Nevada and the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.
[09:38.280 --> 09:42.000]  The fundamental principle of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of
[09:42.000 --> 09:46.040]  America is that the government is prohibited from requiring a person to be a witness against
[09:46.040 --> 09:49.240]  himself or to furnish evidence against himself.
[09:49.240 --> 09:55.240]  It is important to note that the language of NRS 485.187-1C specifically identifies
[09:55.240 --> 10:01.680]  proof of automobile insurance as evidence, then proceeds to criminalize an individual's
[10:01.680 --> 10:07.440]  failure or refusal to surrender that evidence upon the government's demand.
[10:07.440 --> 10:13.080]  In this light, the statute's conflict with Fifth Amendment protection is apparent.
[10:13.080 --> 10:17.600]  A review of the trial record will reflect the state offered no evidence of the individual's
[10:17.600 --> 10:23.120]  lack of automobile insurance beyond the testimony of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
[10:23.120 --> 10:28.740]  that the individual did not surrender the evidence of insurance at the time he was cited.
[10:28.740 --> 10:34.360]  It is the individual's responsibility to establish probable cause or the state's responsibility
[10:34.360 --> 10:39.840]  to establish probable cause that an individual has violated a statute and subsequently prosecute
[10:39.840 --> 10:44.600]  the case pursuant to provisions consistent with due process protections.
[10:44.600 --> 10:49.560]  And consistent with due process considerations, an individual is endowed with a natural protection
[10:49.560 --> 10:54.760]  from being dragged into court by the state, put on trial, and forced to produce the volume
[10:54.760 --> 11:02.160]  of exculpatory evidence required to earn acquittal or alternatively stay unconvicted.
[11:02.160 --> 11:10.080]  The individual's conviction for violating NRS 485.187 was facilitated by statutory language
[11:10.080 --> 11:16.120]  that unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof, the burden of establishing the individual's
[11:16.120 --> 11:23.320]  status as either an insured or uninsured driver from the state to the individual himself.
[11:23.320 --> 11:28.160]  In short, when the individual protected by the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution refused
[11:28.160 --> 11:34.940]  to testify against himself or provided evidence against himself at trial, the state capitalized
[11:34.940 --> 11:41.640]  on the nonexistence of evidence by arguing that the individual's failure to provide evidence
[11:41.640 --> 11:47.520]  of insurance was sufficient for conviction regardless of the state's failure to produce
[11:47.520 --> 11:53.800]  any independent evidence of the individual's status as an uninsured driver.
[11:53.800 --> 12:00.280]  NRS 485.187 is comprised of language that is constitutionally toxic and invites such
[12:00.280 --> 12:03.160]  prosecutorial abuse by the state.
[12:03.160 --> 12:09.400]  The individual's conviction of violating NRS 485.187 in the absence of any evidence establishing
[12:09.400 --> 12:13.640]  guilt requires reversal of the Justice Court adjudication.
[12:13.640 --> 12:17.720]  Now, attached to this, they also have their transcript.
[12:17.720 --> 12:24.360]  Now what I want to do is read to you how I responded back to this.
[12:24.360 --> 12:28.240]  Okay, let's see.
[12:28.240 --> 12:33.960]  All right, I told him that the document appears to be fairly well put together, but these
[12:33.960 --> 12:39.440]  are specific points that I would have either strengthened in the arguments that he did
[12:39.440 --> 12:45.200]  make or would have stressed as arguments that he didn't specifically make.
[12:45.200 --> 12:48.800]  And there's not many, there's only five variations here.
[12:48.800 --> 12:55.960]  One, the state cannot convert the exercise of protected unalienable rights into a crime,
[12:55.960 --> 12:59.320]  which is precisely what the statute does.
[12:59.320 --> 13:04.960]  That specific language is missing from his point to that particular aspect.
[13:04.960 --> 13:11.320]  Two, the statute creates a presumption of guilt over innocence as well as just the burden
[13:11.320 --> 13:14.000]  of proof to the accused in a criminal matter.
[13:14.000 --> 13:17.480]  That point was also missing from his argument.
[13:17.480 --> 13:24.480]  The absence of evidence is not evidentiary proof of criminal activity or the basis for
[13:24.480 --> 13:26.880]  probable cause.
[13:26.880 --> 13:28.780]  Now imagine that, folks.
[13:28.780 --> 13:35.960]  We have no evidence against you, but because you won't give us evidence that you aren't
[13:35.960 --> 13:41.280]  guilty, that gives us probable cause to say that you are.
[13:41.280 --> 13:45.460]  Anyone see a problem with that logic?
[13:45.460 --> 13:49.040]  Because that is exactly the logic being applied here.
[13:49.040 --> 13:54.320]  That is exactly the logic being applied not only by the officers on the scene, but the
[13:54.320 --> 13:58.280]  statute both in Nevada and Texas.
[13:58.280 --> 14:02.960]  That is exactly what it's doing.
[14:02.960 --> 14:05.760]  So let me complete that.
[14:05.760 --> 14:11.640]  It is not, the absence of evidence is not evidentiary proof of criminal activity or
[14:11.640 --> 14:18.080]  the basis of probable cause or for probable cause, and it is reprehensible that a conviction
[14:18.080 --> 14:24.480]  may be upheld where no evidence in support of probable cause or the verdict appears on
[14:24.480 --> 14:27.760]  the record, and none does.
[14:27.760 --> 14:30.680]  The cops simply say he didn't show it to us.
[14:30.680 --> 14:35.120]  Nowhere do they say we checked all these records and all those records and nobody could tell
[14:35.120 --> 14:36.680]  us that he was.
[14:36.680 --> 14:40.880]  They simply say, well, he didn't prove he wasn't, so he's guilty.
[14:40.880 --> 14:48.920]  Four, that a person being criminally investigated for any reason cannot be compelled to supply
[14:48.920 --> 14:56.380]  even potential evidence against him or herself in any form, regardless of whether or not
[14:56.380 --> 15:02.320]  it would later be ruled to constitute a waiver of a protected inherent and unalienable right.
[15:02.320 --> 15:06.400]  So the court could say, well, production of this isn't a waiver of your right to remain
[15:06.400 --> 15:07.800]  silent and blah, blah, blah.
[15:07.800 --> 15:14.600]  It isn't a waiver of your testifying against yourself, and it wouldn't have constituted
[15:14.600 --> 15:20.040]  that, which is a baseless lie if they did rule that way, but they can't.
[15:20.040 --> 15:24.600]  So that creates an immediate problem.
[15:24.600 --> 15:26.840]  Does it not?
[15:26.840 --> 15:34.200]  So even if they said that, yeah, okay, you have not been allowed to consult legal counsel
[15:34.200 --> 15:40.240]  to determine whether or not any of the information you're being told to give out does possibly
[15:40.240 --> 15:48.000]  waive a right or act to further endanger you for criminal activity, you don't know.
[15:48.000 --> 15:51.320]  You're not the lawyer or the attorney, right?
[15:51.320 --> 15:54.000]  Not your job.
[15:54.000 --> 16:00.280]  So the fact that you don't provide it without any advice from counsel, that certainly cannot
[16:00.280 --> 16:05.680]  be converted into a crime if you even remotely believe that the information can be detrimental
[16:05.680 --> 16:10.920]  to the outcome of their investigation to which you are the party.
[16:10.920 --> 16:14.320]  You follow?
[16:14.320 --> 16:20.720]  Now the first witness that was called by state in his case was some woman from the Department
[16:20.720 --> 16:22.400]  of Motor Vehicles there in Nevada.
[16:22.400 --> 16:28.280]  Now I didn't read the whole transcript, but presumptively her testimony was to be based
[16:28.280 --> 16:33.720]  upon retrieval of records that shows this individual, A, didn't have the license or
[16:33.720 --> 16:36.560]  the insurance according to their records.
[16:36.560 --> 16:41.280]  So I'm going to detail that argument out here in just a minute when we get back from this
[16:41.280 --> 16:42.280]  break.
[16:42.280 --> 16:46.520]  In the meantime, if y'all want to start getting in line, because I'll be done with this shortly
[16:46.520 --> 16:52.480]  through the next section here, call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:52.480 --> 17:00.760]  Y'all give us a call to get in line and we will be right back after the break.
[17:00.760 --> 17:05.360]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[17:05.360 --> 17:06.760]  of nutrition.
[17:06.760 --> 17:11.480]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.480 --> 17:17.200]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.200 --> 17:23.480]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[17:23.480 --> 17:25.960]  provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.960 --> 17:30.720]  Logos Serial Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[17:30.720 --> 17:31.720]  we reject.
[17:31.720 --> 17:36.960]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[17:36.960 --> 17:39.760]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.760 --> 17:46.160]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[17:46.160 --> 17:47.160]  quality radio.
[17:47.160 --> 17:51.680]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.680 --> 17:57.320]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[17:57.320 --> 17:59.280]  increase your income.
[17:59.280 --> 18:00.640]  Order now.
[18:00.640 --> 18:05.360]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.360 --> 18:09.440]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.440 --> 18:13.760]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.760 --> 18:14.760]  can win two.
[18:14.760 --> 18:19.600]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.600 --> 18:25.040]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to
[18:25.040 --> 18:29.560]  answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[18:29.560 --> 18:34.200]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.200 --> 18:39.320]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.320 --> 18:41.440]  Full consultation is available as well.
[18:41.440 --> 18:47.080]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[18:47.080 --> 18:49.960]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.960 --> 18:58.960]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[18:58.960 --> 18:59.960]  collectors now.
[18:59.960 --> 19:09.960]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, lo-lo-lo-logosradio-network.com.
[19:09.960 --> 19:36.960]  Thank you very much for listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:36.960 --> 19:45.960]  All right, folks, we are back again calling number 512-646-1984.
[19:45.960 --> 19:50.960]  All right, let me wrap this up and I'll start getting to your calls here.
[19:50.960 --> 19:55.840]  All right, now as I was saying before break, the first witness called in his case prior
[19:55.840 --> 19:59.600]  to the police officers was some lady from the Department of Motor Vehicles there in
[19:59.600 --> 20:06.400]  Nevada, presumably to testify to records that were retrieved from their system relating
[20:06.400 --> 20:15.440]  to the state of this individual's license and to their state of financial responsibility.
[20:15.440 --> 20:20.040]  Now this is what I told him in relation to that specific witness.
[20:20.040 --> 20:25.220]  First off, he received no notice of this witness's appearance, nor did he receive copies of any
[20:25.220 --> 20:30.560]  records this witness was going to be asked to testify to from the prosecution.
[20:30.560 --> 20:35.140]  So this was not only a surprise witness, they were using surprise evidence that they never
[20:35.140 --> 20:38.180]  bothered to give to the other side.
[20:38.180 --> 20:46.800]  So besides that little issue, this person should have been objected to immediately.
[20:46.800 --> 20:48.800]  And here is the basis for that.
[20:48.800 --> 20:53.440]  The first witness called the DMV employee should have been objected to and questioned
[20:53.440 --> 20:59.560]  by you as to her personal knowledge of the computer data she was testifying to.
[20:59.560 --> 21:06.160]  If she didn't personally enter it or watch it being entered and then personally retrieve
[21:06.160 --> 21:12.640]  it from the system in order to bring it in as evidence at your trial, her testimony as
[21:12.640 --> 21:20.160]  to its creation, accuracy, and reliability constitutes hearsay testimony to which you
[21:20.160 --> 21:27.000]  should vehemently object as such and move to suppress.
[21:27.000 --> 21:32.760]  People cannot testify to information retrieved from a computer system for which they have
[21:32.760 --> 21:35.080]  no personal knowledge.
[21:35.080 --> 21:39.440]  The Supreme Court and the federal courts have ruled on that consistently.
[21:39.440 --> 21:47.560]  The only exception to this rule is if the data being testified to is directly computational
[21:47.560 --> 21:49.720]  by the system itself.
[21:49.720 --> 21:57.320]  For instance, the result of a mathematical computation can be testified to and it not
[21:57.320 --> 22:04.800]  be hearsay if that computation was performed by the computer in question.
[22:04.800 --> 22:13.280]  But any other type of data such as names, addresses, insurance information, license
[22:13.280 --> 22:21.040]  status information, all of that is entered directly by human beings.
[22:21.040 --> 22:30.360]  And only someone with direct personal knowledge of that data can testify to it.
[22:30.360 --> 22:38.360]  Odds are this woman didn't enter any of the data she was being asked to testify to.
[22:38.360 --> 22:42.040]  That should have drawn an immediate objection.
[22:42.040 --> 22:48.000]  She is not competent to testify to the validity of that information if she did not personally
[22:48.000 --> 22:54.400]  enter it and personally retrieve it for the purpose of bringing it to trial.
[22:54.400 --> 22:57.300]  It's that simple.
[22:57.300 --> 23:00.920]  But he didn't object to that introduction of evidence.
[23:00.920 --> 23:09.200]  If he had, then again the issue with the license would have also been relevant only in what
[23:09.200 --> 23:15.440]  the officers testified to and they would have testified only, unless of course he confessed
[23:15.440 --> 23:20.320]  to not having a license at the time, during the stop, which is why I tell you don't open
[23:20.320 --> 23:23.880]  your mouth about any of that.
[23:23.880 --> 23:27.600]  But only if he had done that could the officer have testified because the officer would have
[23:27.600 --> 23:30.840]  run face first into the same brick wall.
[23:30.840 --> 23:35.520]  The only way they could have testified as this person had no license if he didn't admit
[23:35.520 --> 23:40.600]  to it was because they looked up information on their computer.
[23:40.600 --> 23:43.560]  They didn't enter that information either.
[23:43.560 --> 23:50.640]  It is the same hearsay rule as it is for the clerk from the DMV.
[23:50.640 --> 23:57.680]  The cop can't testify to the lack of the insurance or the lack of the license if they're relying
[23:57.680 --> 24:02.000]  on hearsay information retrieved by their computer.
[24:02.000 --> 24:10.960]  But until you object to it and until you move for its exclusion and suppression by the court,
[24:10.960 --> 24:12.160]  it's going to be let in.
[24:12.160 --> 24:17.320]  It's going to become a valid part of the record and it's going to be used against you on appeal.
[24:17.320 --> 24:19.640]  That simple.
[24:19.640 --> 24:26.080]  So folks, when you don't know the rules they have to play by, you open yourself up to these
[24:26.080 --> 24:31.800]  sucker punches and that's what they are.
[24:31.800 --> 24:39.200]  I spend so much time not trying to get this book finished but at the same time trying
[24:39.200 --> 24:44.520]  to assist people who for some reason refuse to be assisted.
[24:44.520 --> 24:50.440]  They beg for help and then they will listen to everything except what you tell them.
[24:50.440 --> 24:57.560]  Case in point, a lot of the legal groups that I participate in on Facebook and try to help
[24:57.560 --> 25:04.520]  people out with, one by one they're coming to realize that all of this bull crap patron
[25:04.520 --> 25:09.920]  nut BS they've been trying to use is not working.
[25:09.920 --> 25:13.000]  Big surprise.
[25:13.000 --> 25:19.600]  And sure enough, the stuff that I'm trying to get people to do has been working.
[25:19.600 --> 25:24.040]  It's not going to work at trial because the trial court doesn't care.
[25:24.040 --> 25:30.520]  But when you take it to appeal, it will matter as long as you preserve the error of what
[25:30.520 --> 25:36.440]  they did by objecting to it for the record and documenting it if it's in a court of no
[25:36.440 --> 25:42.680]  record through affidavits from yourself and witnesses that the trial court aired and letting
[25:42.680 --> 25:45.200]  this in to begin with.
[25:45.200 --> 25:49.080]  The other thing they did wrong was they did a bench trial.
[25:49.080 --> 25:51.560]  They didn't get a jury trial.
[25:51.560 --> 25:56.800]  Now, again, the jury is not there to find you innocent.
[25:56.800 --> 25:58.000]  They're not going to do that.
[25:58.000 --> 26:01.600]  The wolf pulled over their eyes like it is everyone else's.
[26:01.600 --> 26:09.800]  The jury is there to cost them more money so that their profits are not as big, okay?
[26:09.800 --> 26:14.440]  And then in the off chance that there's someone in the jury that actually comprehends right
[26:14.440 --> 26:20.640]  and wrong and legal due process, they can tell the others how can you guys convict them?
[26:20.640 --> 26:23.560]  The state didn't bring in any evidence.
[26:23.560 --> 26:26.080]  The cop just said so.
[26:26.080 --> 26:32.480]  He didn't bring in any records or anything that were admissible.
[26:32.480 --> 26:35.800]  How can you convict?
[26:35.800 --> 26:40.040]  There's always that possibility, though it is very, very slim.
[26:40.040 --> 26:44.160]  But until we start educating our friends, our neighbors, and everyone that's going to
[26:44.160 --> 26:50.840]  be sitting in these juries as to what your rights as well as theirs is, which they will
[26:50.840 --> 26:56.080]  be crying all about the first time they find themselves in a situation where they think
[26:56.080 --> 27:02.040]  they're being dealt an injustice, and they go in there ignorant and blindfolded to the
[27:02.040 --> 27:07.160]  concept that the jury is going to see through the shenanigans and find me innocent because
[27:07.160 --> 27:08.680]  I'm a good person.
[27:08.680 --> 27:11.880]  I didn't do this.
[27:11.880 --> 27:21.360]  This again, till you learn how to make the other side's arguments fall on their face,
[27:21.360 --> 27:23.520]  you're going to lose.
[27:23.520 --> 27:27.880]  The jury will never be convinced if you have no clue what you're doing.
[27:27.880 --> 27:32.080]  How can you say you're not guilty when you have no clue how to handle the situation?
[27:32.080 --> 27:35.640]  You wouldn't know if you were guilty or not because you're clueless.
[27:35.640 --> 27:38.560]  That's exactly how they're going to see it.
[27:38.560 --> 27:42.840]  And they've been indoctrinated into believing everything that that individual has been believing
[27:42.840 --> 27:47.320]  their whole life as well up until this point.
[27:47.320 --> 27:52.440]  So folks, stop looking for the patronut silver bullets.
[27:52.440 --> 28:00.120]  This UCC straw man, all caps name, gold fringe flag.
[28:00.120 --> 28:06.880]  None of that does you any good if you cannot preserve the errors that are being committed
[28:06.880 --> 28:13.200]  by the other side and harming your right of due process.
[28:13.200 --> 28:16.560]  You got it?
[28:16.560 --> 28:18.560]  So keep that in mind.
[28:18.560 --> 28:24.400]  That's the whole reason my class exists, the whole reason.
[28:24.400 --> 28:31.840]  And yet every Sunday, there isn't enough people in there to scream at really well.
[28:31.840 --> 28:35.620]  And yes, I do tend to yell a lot there, just like I do here on this show.
[28:35.620 --> 28:43.080]  But then again, I'm out here screaming into the wind and it seems like all I'm getting
[28:43.080 --> 28:48.400]  back is the roar of the moving breeze because very few people are actually seeming to pay
[28:48.400 --> 28:53.640]  attention because nobody ever comes to this class even when they can to learn what they
[28:53.640 --> 28:54.640]  need to learn.
[28:54.640 --> 28:59.760]  This class should be packed because I'm trying to teach you how to apply these rules or procedure
[28:59.760 --> 29:04.640]  to what they do to protect yourself.
[29:04.640 --> 29:10.160]  It's like every soldier in Iraq running out into an ambush without their body armor or
[29:10.160 --> 29:12.280]  their gun.
[29:12.280 --> 29:15.400]  How do you fight a battle like that?
[29:15.400 --> 29:20.160]  The other side is armed and prepared, why aren't you?
[29:20.160 --> 29:24.960]  Because you're lazy, you're apathetic, you think you can deal with it just because you've
[29:24.960 --> 29:30.200]  sat and listened to me, but you've never actually practiced any of this.
[29:30.200 --> 29:37.320]  And believe me, without the practice, the rest of it won't work as expected.
[29:37.320 --> 29:38.320]  Just won't.
[29:38.320 --> 29:43.120]  Doesn't do you any good to put on body armor incorrectly, doesn't do you any good to load
[29:43.120 --> 29:46.880]  or clean your gun incorrectly or have it blow up in your face.
[29:46.880 --> 29:51.800]  Until you learn how to do it all right, you're endangering yourself and others.
[29:51.800 --> 30:00.960]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after the break, 512-646-1984.
[30:00.960 --> 30:02.960]  Is noisy work killing you?
[30:02.960 --> 30:03.960]  Could these say researchers?
[30:03.960 --> 30:08.320]  A new study finds that hearing loss may be the least of your health worries in a loud
[30:08.320 --> 30:09.320]  workplace.
[30:09.320 --> 30:12.940]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you more in just a moment.
[30:12.940 --> 30:18.280]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database
[30:18.280 --> 30:20.040]  of your personal information.
[30:20.040 --> 30:21.240]  That's creepy.
[30:21.240 --> 30:23.640]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:23.640 --> 30:26.720]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:26.720 --> 30:30.600]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking
[30:30.600 --> 30:32.520]  cookies and they're third-party certified.
[30:32.520 --> 30:37.360]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[30:37.360 --> 30:40.200]  Great search results and total privacy.
[30:40.200 --> 30:42.840]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:42.840 --> 30:46.000]  Noise at work could be killing you, literally.
[30:46.000 --> 30:49.840]  A new study looked at employees who worked in noisy environments for at least a year
[30:49.840 --> 30:50.840]  and a half.
[30:50.840 --> 30:54.840]  They found their risk of serious heart trouble was triple that of employees who worked in
[30:54.840 --> 30:55.840]  a quiet environment.
[30:55.840 --> 30:58.240]  What is a noisy workspace?
[30:58.240 --> 31:02.040]  Researchers say if you have to raise your voice to carry on a normal conversation, it's
[31:02.040 --> 31:03.040]  noisy.
[31:03.040 --> 31:07.920]  By that definition, more than 22 million Americans face noise hazards on the job every day.
[31:07.920 --> 31:12.160]  If finding a quieter job isn't an option, take precautions to help offset the effects
[31:12.160 --> 31:13.280]  of noise.
[31:13.280 --> 31:17.520]  Use earplugs, take good care of yourself, and limit the other stressors in your life.
[31:17.520 --> 31:30.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.840 --> 31:31.840]  What are you thinking?
[31:31.840 --> 31:38.120]  Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics or a total body detox for around $10 a month?
[31:38.120 --> 31:43.760]  If USA.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from
[31:43.760 --> 31:49.240]  your kidney, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever, it alkalizes.
[31:49.240 --> 31:54.600]  Oxygen A kills parasites, does the job of 10 products, that saves you space, time, and
[31:54.600 --> 31:55.600]  money.
[31:55.600 --> 31:58.600]  Call 888-910-4367 or visit usa.org.
[31:58.600 --> 32:05.080]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.080 --> 32:07.600]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society.
[32:07.600 --> 32:10.800]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to
[32:10.800 --> 32:12.880]  stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.880 --> 32:16.120]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:16.120 --> 32:19.840]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.840 --> 32:24.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.000 --> 32:25.480]  our rights through due process.
[32:25.480 --> 32:29.360]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.360 --> 32:33.120]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.120 --> 32:35.520]  is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.520 --> 32:39.520]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:39.520 --> 32:40.840]  ordering your copy today.
[32:40.840 --> 32:44.200]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.200 --> 32:48.600]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.600 --> 32:50.480]  documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.480 --> 32:54.120]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.120 --> 33:15.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:15.000 --> 33:34.920]  All right, folks.
[33:34.920 --> 33:35.920]  We are back.
[33:35.920 --> 33:39.040]  This is Rule of Law Radio Monday night show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[33:39.040 --> 33:40.040]  Now one last announcement.
[33:40.040 --> 33:42.440]  I'm going to start taking your calls.
[33:42.440 --> 33:48.560]  I am going to attempt to set up a crowdfunding project, which I will send out notice of through
[33:48.560 --> 33:50.960]  Facebook and I'm also going to do here on the show.
[33:50.960 --> 33:55.360]  But here is what the effort is going to be.
[33:55.360 --> 34:02.680]  I am going to attempt to get enough money to gather enough equipment, cameras, the computer
[34:02.680 --> 34:12.800]  systems necessary to do it in order to live stream video, not only from my class, but
[34:12.800 --> 34:17.480]  for daily projects in general.
[34:17.480 --> 34:24.000]  Basically speaking, set this up so that we can actually do teleconferencing where once
[34:24.000 --> 34:30.440]  the website launches, especially that we will be able to stream everything live that we're
[34:30.440 --> 34:36.920]  doing in relation to Tower of Law, the bookstore and so on and so forth.
[34:36.920 --> 34:42.040]  The bookstore is actually looking at getting its own system set up for doing live streaming
[34:42.040 --> 34:44.480]  of events at the bookstore.
[34:44.480 --> 34:50.400]  But I'm actually hoping to be able to get the money to get the equipment so that I can
[34:50.400 --> 34:58.960]  take this on the road at times and go do live presentations in other locations and stream
[34:58.960 --> 35:03.280]  those simultaneously while we're there.
[35:03.280 --> 35:07.360]  For instance, I've got an invite right now to go down to Houston and specifically talk
[35:07.360 --> 35:13.860]  about the open carry bill and the right to keep and bear arms in relation to the Texas
[35:13.860 --> 35:18.000]  Constitution and the rights of individuals and what the legislature is doing or not doing
[35:18.000 --> 35:20.480]  on the subject.
[35:20.480 --> 35:25.280]  This would have also been something great to do had I had this equipment when I went
[35:25.280 --> 35:30.400]  up to Lubbock to talk about their water rights and things like that under the Texas Constitution
[35:30.400 --> 35:34.000]  and the laws of Texas as well.
[35:34.000 --> 35:37.960]  That would have been useful for folks that are looking at land patent information and
[35:37.960 --> 35:43.180]  stuff because we dealt a lot with the land patents as they have them up there.
[35:43.180 --> 35:49.760]  Most of the folks up there that have the big plots of land all have the actual land patent
[35:49.760 --> 35:52.740]  that's been carried forward in their name.
[35:52.740 --> 35:58.440]  That patent does significant things in relation to what the state claims it can do because
[35:58.440 --> 36:04.600]  the language of the patent signed by the governor of Texas at the time of its issuance says
[36:04.600 --> 36:12.440]  very clearly that the state relinquishes all claims and title to that property.
[36:12.440 --> 36:17.800]  That would be exactly the same thing as ceding the land to the federal government.
[36:17.800 --> 36:24.760]  Once they do that, state law doesn't apply there anymore because the land does not belong
[36:24.760 --> 36:26.480]  to the state.
[36:26.480 --> 36:30.160]  It belongs to the individual.
[36:30.160 --> 36:32.800]  The state cannot tax that private property.
[36:32.800 --> 36:37.480]  We've never allowed private property to be taxed in Texas without the consent of the
[36:37.480 --> 36:43.640]  owner up until they tried to alter the language of the Texas Constitution to make it appear
[36:43.640 --> 36:51.880]  that we did by changing private property to be similar to the reference of real property
[36:51.880 --> 36:57.480]  even though it is in fact not the same thing.
[36:57.480 --> 37:01.760]  So folks, there's a lot of subterfuge going on, a lot of which I covered in the class
[37:01.760 --> 37:03.720]  this past Sunday.
[37:03.720 --> 37:08.760]  I proved beyond a shadow of a doubt in class that almost all of the current iterations
[37:08.760 --> 37:14.580]  of the codes of Texas are unconstitutional on their face.
[37:14.580 --> 37:17.800]  They were unconstitutionally passed.
[37:17.800 --> 37:23.680]  No matter what the courts want to say, the Constitution and the statutes make it very
[37:23.680 --> 37:33.280]  clear that everything in that enactment, it violates what we the people declared as necessary.
[37:33.280 --> 37:36.540]  And those of you that didn't attend, you missed out.
[37:36.540 --> 37:42.040]  Those of you that have the inability to attend, you missed out.
[37:42.040 --> 37:46.840]  That is what this crowdfunding effort I'm going to be making to raise the money for
[37:46.840 --> 37:47.840]  this.
[37:47.840 --> 37:49.680]  And folks, it ain't cheap.
[37:49.680 --> 37:56.240]  We're looking at upwards of 30 grand to get everything, everything, which is the cameras,
[37:56.240 --> 38:02.800]  the sound equipment, the computers, the streaming stuff, everything we need to make this portable
[38:02.800 --> 38:05.160]  and available.
[38:05.160 --> 38:07.160]  So it's not going to be cheap.
[38:07.160 --> 38:13.600]  But anything you can do to help raise the money for that and make this work, we'd appreciate
[38:13.600 --> 38:16.200]  because we want this message out.
[38:16.200 --> 38:22.560]  The more people we have getting into this and understanding what's truly being done,
[38:22.560 --> 38:29.480]  the more likely we have and the time we can increase our response to what is happening
[38:29.480 --> 38:31.640]  to us and being done to us.
[38:31.640 --> 38:32.960]  All right.
[38:32.960 --> 38:35.360]  That being said, let's get started with our callers.
[38:35.360 --> 38:36.360]  All right.
[38:36.360 --> 38:37.360]  Sorry to take so long, guys.
[38:37.360 --> 38:38.760]  Let's go to Johnny in Michigan.
[38:38.760 --> 38:39.760]  Johnny, what do you got?
[38:39.760 --> 38:40.760]  Hey, Eddie.
[38:40.760 --> 38:41.760]  Okay.
[38:41.760 --> 38:42.760]  Can you hear me?
[38:42.760 --> 38:43.760]  I can hear you.
[38:43.760 --> 38:44.760]  Well, I was calling in about a couple things.
[38:44.760 --> 38:51.760]  But since we're on this subject, I want to point out something I had recently found in
[38:51.760 --> 39:00.160]  the Michigan Constitution under Article 7, Local Government, Section 22, Charters, Resolutions,
[39:00.160 --> 39:03.320]  Ordinances, and Enumeration of Powers.
[39:03.320 --> 39:08.000]  Section 22, under the general laws, the electors of each city and village shall have the power
[39:08.000 --> 39:12.680]  and authority to frame, adopt, amend its charter and to amend an existing charter of the city
[39:12.680 --> 39:17.120]  or village, heretofore granted and enacted by a legislator for the government of the
[39:17.120 --> 39:18.120]  city or village.
[39:18.120 --> 39:19.120]  Period.
[39:19.120 --> 39:23.880]  Then it states here, or next sentence, each such city and village shall have the power
[39:23.880 --> 39:32.880]  to adopt resolutions and ordinances relating to its municipal concerns, property, and government
[39:32.880 --> 39:36.040]  subject to the Constitution and law.
[39:36.040 --> 39:40.720]  Now, that makes it very, very, very clear in the Constitution here, like it does in
[39:40.720 --> 39:45.520]  Texas, from what I had remember reading when, I don't know, like a year ago, you had mentioned
[39:45.520 --> 39:51.880]  this, that it only applies to their property and their municipal concerns.
[39:51.880 --> 39:57.440]  Well, but what they're going to try to argue is that any property within their territorial
[39:57.440 --> 40:00.040]  borders is their municipal concern.
[40:00.040 --> 40:06.720]  See, what most of these people in office fail to understand about their interpretation is
[40:06.720 --> 40:15.200]  their interpretation is not allowed to violate a right or another provision of the Constitution
[40:15.200 --> 40:18.520]  in order for that interpretation to be effective.
[40:18.520 --> 40:20.720]  They completely forget that part.
[40:20.720 --> 40:21.720]  Right.
[40:21.720 --> 40:27.800]  Well, also something else that I wanted to talk about, you know, throughout my research,
[40:27.800 --> 40:31.360]  kind of on the subject from a couple days ago, well, actually a couple days ago that
[40:31.360 --> 40:36.120]  I was listening, probably two, three weeks ago now, you know, throughout my research
[40:36.120 --> 40:41.040]  into this transportation issue and reading the massive amounts of case law on the subject,
[40:41.040 --> 40:45.280]  I've noticed a few reoccurring things, which I think the listeners and other folks out
[40:45.280 --> 40:49.920]  there who aren't very familiar with the subject, or, you know, those who are otherwise uninformed
[40:49.920 --> 40:56.080]  laymen, something that they need to know, and that's exactly how much of this case law
[40:56.080 --> 40:59.640]  that the state actors attempt to use against us, you know, and the case law referenced
[40:59.640 --> 41:03.440]  and cited in those decisions, actually only properly applied to drivers and operators
[41:03.440 --> 41:08.640]  of motor vehicles, which as many of us know, you know, is someone who's engaged in a specific
[41:08.640 --> 41:13.960]  regulatable activity known as transportation or some other activity directly associated
[41:13.960 --> 41:16.520]  with it, you know, not detached from a commercial nexus.
[41:16.520 --> 41:17.520]  Correct.
[41:17.520 --> 41:22.080]  And in the courts and, you know, the judges, they seem to erroneously use the term automobile
[41:22.080 --> 41:28.160]  as always interchangeable with motor vehicle, especially, you know, in the newer one.
[41:28.160 --> 41:31.880]  So in just a moment, you know, I, you know, for the benefit of the listeners, I would
[41:31.880 --> 41:36.160]  like to hear your take on the legal distinction between a motor vehicle and automobile.
[41:36.160 --> 41:42.480]  Well there is federal case law that says an automobile is a motor vehicle, and that's
[41:42.480 --> 41:45.640]  like saying a horse is a donkey.
[41:45.640 --> 41:46.860]  Right, right.
[41:46.860 --> 41:50.720]  They both can be used to do exactly the same thing.
[41:50.720 --> 41:59.760]  They're similar in how they're made, how they look, and in some cases how they act.
[41:59.760 --> 42:08.020]  But neither the horse nor the donkey are used for commerce until they're hooked up to something
[42:08.020 --> 42:16.840]  and are paid to move that something from one place to another using a public road.
[42:16.840 --> 42:22.500]  So the fact that they are similar is irrelevant, and that's what they're doing when they try
[42:22.500 --> 42:24.280]  to use automobile.
[42:24.280 --> 42:31.720]  They are trying to make it appear as if automobile equals motor vehicle automatically, when even
[42:31.720 --> 42:39.760]  the case law says it is the use to which it is put that makes the determination of whether
[42:39.760 --> 42:45.080]  or not it's a motor vehicle, not its method of propulsion or construction.
[42:45.080 --> 42:50.200]  And what I wanted to address relating to this is exactly how these judges very cleverly
[42:50.200 --> 42:54.600]  hide the true meaning of what they actually say in most of the case decisions from the
[42:54.600 --> 42:56.240]  masses.
[42:56.240 --> 43:00.520]  One modern example of something I just recently read is in footnote six of the Supreme Court
[43:00.520 --> 43:08.360]  of the United States of America's case titled Brendlin versus California, that's B-R-E-N-D-L-I-N
[43:08.360 --> 43:18.480]  versus California, 551 U.S. 249 from 2009, which reads, and I quote, California claims
[43:18.480 --> 43:24.360]  under today's rule, comma, all taxi cab and bus passengers would be seized under the fourth
[43:24.360 --> 43:30.440]  amendment when the cab or bus driver is pulled over by the police for running a red light,
[43:30.440 --> 43:36.000]  comma, but the relationship between driver and passenger is not the same in a common
[43:36.000 --> 43:38.600]  carrier as it is in a private vehicle.
[43:38.600 --> 43:39.600]  Correct.
[43:39.600 --> 43:41.880]  Expectations of police officers and passengers.
[43:41.880 --> 43:43.480]  Okay, Johnny, hang on just a second.
[43:43.480 --> 43:44.480]  We're about to go to break.
[43:44.480 --> 43:45.480]  You can finish that up on the other side, okay?
[43:45.480 --> 43:47.480]  I just wanted to finish that sentence before I go on.
[43:47.480 --> 43:49.720]  Yeah, we don't have the time, but hold on just a sec.
[43:49.720 --> 43:52.400]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[43:52.400 --> 43:53.400]  So y'all hang in there.
[43:53.400 --> 43:54.400]  512-646-1984.
[43:54.400 --> 43:57.400]  We'll be right back.
[43:57.400 --> 44:04.120]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.120 --> 44:10.880]  In your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course
[44:10.880 --> 44:17.520]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step, if you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer
[44:17.520 --> 44:18.520]  should be doing.
[44:18.520 --> 44:22.920]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.920 --> 44:27.760]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.760 --> 44:33.680]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:33.680 --> 44:39.080]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[44:39.080 --> 44:43.360]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.360 --> 44:49.560]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.560 --> 44:51.880]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.880 --> 45:03.800]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.800 --> 45:04.800]  Hello.
[45:04.800 --> 45:09.240]  My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by
[45:09.240 --> 45:14.200]  our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas, behind Brave New
[45:14.200 --> 45:18.040]  Books and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very
[45:18.040 --> 45:19.040]  own eyes.
[45:19.040 --> 45:23.880]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.880 --> 45:27.880]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil,
[45:27.880 --> 45:31.600]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.600 --> 45:38.080]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.080 --> 45:44.440]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.440 --> 45:48.760]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.760 --> 45:49.760]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:18.760 --> 46:33.960]  All right, folks.
[46:33.960 --> 46:34.960]  We are back.
[46:34.960 --> 46:38.040]  This is Real Wall Radio, and we are talking with Johnny in Michigan.
[46:38.040 --> 46:42.760]  All right, Johnny, can you back up to the beginning of that sentence, dealing with the seizure
[46:42.760 --> 46:45.160]  of the passengers?
[46:45.160 --> 46:49.800]  But the relationship between driver and passenger is not the same in a common carrier as it
[46:49.800 --> 46:56.120]  is in a private vehicle, and the expectations of police officers and passengers differ according.
[46:56.120 --> 47:00.240]  Now, the key words here that I think are extremely difficult for laymen to place in the proper
[47:00.240 --> 47:04.480]  context is common carrier and private vehicle.
[47:04.480 --> 47:09.760]  But here, I think the court means for it to be construed legally as to read something
[47:09.760 --> 47:14.480]  like this, the relationship between an individual receiving payment and an individual paying
[47:14.480 --> 47:20.640]  a fee for the service is not the same as it is in a common carrier as it is in a contract
[47:20.640 --> 47:21.640]  carrier.
[47:21.640 --> 47:27.080]  I assume you would agree that a private vehicle, as used in this context, means substantially
[47:27.080 --> 47:30.280]  the same thing as, you know, a contract carrier.
[47:30.280 --> 47:36.120]  Well, yeah, if you look at the legal meaning of commercial versus contract, a commercial
[47:36.120 --> 47:43.720]  carrier is someone that must haul goods for anyone in public that pays the fees, whereas
[47:43.720 --> 47:50.800]  a contract carrier is someone that can choose who they contract with and what they get paid
[47:50.800 --> 47:53.520]  and what they will or will not haul.
[47:53.520 --> 47:57.600]  That's the key part about the whole private vehicle, the vehicle being the key word.
[47:57.600 --> 47:58.600]  Exactly.
[47:58.600 --> 48:02.080]  And I thought that's very prudent to point out, because it's like when I try to explain
[48:02.080 --> 48:06.680]  things like this, I was just talking with an attorney just the other day dealing with
[48:06.680 --> 48:11.120]  trying to find about mortgage issues and stuff like that, and I had mentioned your show and
[48:11.120 --> 48:14.720]  he actually had heard of you.
[48:14.720 --> 48:19.400]  Not anything good, I imagine, but, you know, he didn't really want to talk about it with
[48:19.400 --> 48:25.960]  anything about that with me after the fact, which is kind of odd, so it's like maybe these
[48:25.960 --> 48:30.840]  guys are catching wind about what people are doing and actually, you know, studying the
[48:30.840 --> 48:34.360]  law, you know, not just going on whatever people tell them to do, you know.
[48:34.360 --> 48:35.360]  Yeah, exactly.
[48:35.360 --> 48:36.360]  They don't like that.
[48:36.360 --> 48:41.640]  They don't want to discuss it because they think that discussing it adds validity to
[48:41.640 --> 48:46.680]  the message, and they don't want to do that because that message takes away profits from
[48:46.680 --> 48:47.680]  their pocket.
[48:47.680 --> 48:53.200]  Well, something, something, no, we had a, I live out in the middle of nowhere close to
[48:53.200 --> 48:58.040]  a little village on the right outskirts of it, right?
[48:58.040 --> 49:02.240]  And I was with a buddy at the library, literally after I had left, I sent you an email, by
[49:02.240 --> 49:03.240]  the way.
[49:03.240 --> 49:15.200]  I finally got an email created, it's j-o-n-n-y, j-a-f-f-a, at mail.com, m-a-i-l.com.
[49:15.200 --> 49:19.600]  If you hadn't got it yet or if you want to look for it about, you know, you had talked
[49:19.600 --> 49:20.600]  about before.
[49:20.600 --> 49:22.600]  I don't recall seeing it, but I'll look.
[49:22.600 --> 49:23.600]  All righty then.
[49:23.600 --> 49:29.240]  And so we had, we had, we had left there and we got pulled over.
[49:29.240 --> 49:33.400]  Now they said they had a new ordinance in place, you know, for, uh, snow on a motor
[49:33.400 --> 49:34.400]  vehicle.
[49:34.400 --> 49:37.600]  And, you know, I, I, I had asked them, you know, me, you know, sitting beside them, I
[49:37.600 --> 49:41.000]  had asked the officer, you know, questions kind of, because he, the guy, you know, I
[49:41.000 --> 49:42.000]  was with, doesn't know really about anything.
[49:42.000 --> 49:45.800]  So I had asked him certain questions, you know, I asked them, well, are you a law enforcement
[49:45.800 --> 49:46.800]  officer?
[49:46.800 --> 49:49.080]  Are you acting as a law enforcement officer here?
[49:49.080 --> 49:50.160]  You know?
[49:50.160 --> 49:51.160]  And he said, yes.
[49:51.160 --> 49:54.240]  And I said, well, sir, what law are you enforcing?
[49:54.240 --> 50:00.000]  And he just kind of couldn't understand how to get to the ordinance being the law.
[50:00.000 --> 50:05.960]  Now, uh, he, he really, he, he, he's just, I don't even know if they can do this.
[50:05.960 --> 50:09.920]  He's with the local sheriff's department, um, volunteering with the municipal police
[50:09.920 --> 50:10.920]  department.
[50:10.920 --> 50:16.880]  I don't know if that's even something that they're able to do or not, but, uh, he really
[50:16.880 --> 50:18.120]  clicked in his head.
[50:18.120 --> 50:25.080]  And that's where I had, you know, I had read that specific, uh, spot, uh, article, 20 something,
[50:25.080 --> 50:29.720]  uh, what I had read earlier, um, from the Michigan constitution.
[50:29.720 --> 50:33.400]  And I had read that out to him and he was just flabbergasted.
[50:33.400 --> 50:37.160]  I said, well, so what you're doing right now is unlawfully in prison, correct?
[50:37.160 --> 50:38.160]  And he says, well, no.
[50:38.160 --> 50:39.160]  So, so are we free to go?
[50:39.160 --> 50:40.160]  And he, uh, yeah, I guess you are.
[50:40.160 --> 50:44.320]  And I said, okay, have a nice day.
[50:44.320 --> 50:48.040]  And I instructed him to roll up the window.
[50:48.040 --> 50:52.560]  And, um, I was trying to get him to get over here to my house to get on the call with,
[50:52.560 --> 50:56.000]  with me here too, about all this, cause he just, he couldn't believe it.
[50:56.000 --> 50:57.000]  I don't know.
[50:57.000 --> 50:59.040]  So yeah, that's the thing folks.
[50:59.040 --> 51:00.720]  This is proof positive.
[51:00.720 --> 51:01.960]  Knowledge is power.
[51:01.960 --> 51:09.080]  You do not have, if you don't have the knowledge, that's very important.
[51:09.080 --> 51:14.300]  Well, I'm glad that worked out as intended and I'm glad you actually had somebody with
[51:14.300 --> 51:18.120]  at least a double digit IQ to decipher the message you were giving them.
[51:18.120 --> 51:19.120]  Yeah.
[51:19.120 --> 51:22.800]  Well, I think he just got, he just got, uh, hired over there.
[51:22.800 --> 51:28.440]  Um, Mr. Reed, but something else I wanted to bring up, cause I go on this site every
[51:28.440 --> 51:33.160]  now and then called, uh, publicintelligence.net and get like declassified documents and whatnot.
[51:33.160 --> 51:37.840]  And I saw something kind of, uh, interesting, um, it's one of these new things kind of like
[51:37.840 --> 51:41.640]  the MIAC report and all that sort of thing and intelligence assessment from, uh, the
[51:41.640 --> 51:46.280]  department of Homeland security entitled sovereign citizen, extremist ideology will drive violence
[51:46.280 --> 51:49.720]  at home comma during travel and at government facilities.
[51:49.720 --> 51:55.280]  Well, believe it or not though, I hate to interrupt you, but they are absolutely correct.
[51:55.280 --> 51:59.480]  It will drive violence at home, but they won't be the source of it.
[51:59.480 --> 52:00.480]  The government will.
[52:00.480 --> 52:05.200]  Well, I imagine there's a lot of, a lot of folks that will do things that they shouldn't
[52:05.200 --> 52:06.200]  be doing either.
[52:06.200 --> 52:07.200]  You know,
[52:07.200 --> 52:12.960]  If they do it, I'd almost be willing to bet in every instance, it will be because they
[52:12.960 --> 52:18.880]  felt like they had no other option, not to start something, but to defend themselves
[52:18.880 --> 52:21.620]  from something that the government was doing.
[52:21.620 --> 52:22.880]  And that's, that's exactly on point.
[52:22.880 --> 52:26.920]  Something I wanted to bring up in this little section here, it says, um, one of their little
[52:26.920 --> 52:33.480]  things about, uh, past events that says Victor white and Odessa, Texas SCE, which I assume
[52:33.480 --> 52:39.040]  stands for sovereign citizen, extremist engaged in a 22 hour armed standoff and gun battle
[52:39.040 --> 52:44.280]  with police in 2010 and was convicted of shooting two officers and a utility worker.
[52:44.280 --> 52:48.200]  White initiated the violence because the police officer was escorting the utility worker
[52:48.200 --> 52:49.740]  onto white's property.
[52:49.740 --> 52:54.960]  White claimed that he was defending and protecting my dignity and the sovereignty of my domain
[52:54.960 --> 52:57.400]  in a jail house interview with media.
[52:57.400 --> 53:00.080]  Now I don't know anything about this and I haven't looked it up on the internet cause
[53:00.080 --> 53:05.360]  I can't get there till a Tuesday, um, to the library, but, uh, I assume the only thing
[53:05.360 --> 53:08.920]  I see this is somebody that's trying to resist these smart meters.
[53:08.920 --> 53:09.920]  They keep going on.
[53:09.920 --> 53:14.280]  Cause I had them coming around here twice already trying to put a smart meter on, on
[53:14.280 --> 53:15.280]  my house.
[53:15.280 --> 53:16.280]  Yeah.
[53:16.280 --> 53:23.000]  Do you know any specific, um, or anyone that might know anything about, uh, people fighting
[53:23.000 --> 53:27.560]  this battle that I know there are several groups and there's one here in Texas that
[53:27.560 --> 53:30.640]  formed specifically to fight against smart meters.
[53:30.640 --> 53:34.840]  They have failed so far to make it mandatory to accept them.
[53:34.840 --> 53:40.120]  Uh, and the group was fighting against it vehemently to prevent it because there are
[53:40.120 --> 53:46.080]  serious health repercussions to having those high frequency, high output machines that
[53:46.080 --> 53:48.280]  close to you all the time.
[53:48.280 --> 53:54.960]  And not only that, the privacy, you know, serious concerns there, um, you know, that
[53:54.960 --> 53:55.960]  even something, you know.
[53:55.960 --> 54:00.680]  I, here's what I would do if I were folks that got stuck with one of these, I would
[54:00.680 --> 54:09.240]  go buy one of those pizza bags that has the silver lining inside to keep the pizza hot
[54:09.240 --> 54:14.420]  and go tuck it directly over that smart meter.
[54:14.420 --> 54:20.640]  It will block all radio signal and thus completely negate the entire reason they put it there
[54:20.640 --> 54:27.600]  in the first place, besides trying to ill illegally adjust your bill from a distance,
[54:27.600 --> 54:33.160]  which is the first thing the smart meters were proven to do was to miss bill by misstating
[54:33.160 --> 54:38.640]  the actual usage on the location, but that will block the signal so they can't read it
[54:38.640 --> 54:39.640]  from a distance.
[54:39.640 --> 54:43.760]  Well, yeah, well, they, what they try to do is to bring up some kind of socialist thing
[54:43.760 --> 54:50.960]  and say, well, it's an equalizational value of all the people that pay in as some kind
[54:50.960 --> 54:51.960]  of program.
[54:51.960 --> 54:56.360]  They try to enroll me in without any, yeah, it's, you're paying for somebody else's electricity,
[54:56.360 --> 54:58.120]  no matter how much you use.
[54:58.120 --> 54:59.120]  Exactly.
[54:59.120 --> 55:01.520]  I'm like, that's absurd.
[55:01.520 --> 55:03.400]  It's socialist utilities.
[55:03.400 --> 55:04.400]  That's what it is.
[55:04.400 --> 55:07.400]  You know, power generators or something like that.
[55:07.400 --> 55:08.400]  Yeah.
[55:08.400 --> 55:15.640]  No, I was specifically though, you know, people that have fought this in court, you know,
[55:15.640 --> 55:22.000]  I was looking for some case law on it and the only thing I found, you know, is in California,
[55:22.000 --> 55:23.000]  you know.
[55:23.000 --> 55:24.000]  Yeah.
[55:24.000 --> 55:30.720]  The thing is, is most people don't understand ordinances are not law on the public.
[55:30.720 --> 55:33.120]  They're simply not.
[55:33.120 --> 55:39.080]  In every state of the union, the people within their constitution gave binding lawmaking
[55:39.080 --> 55:41.760]  power only to their legislators.
[55:41.760 --> 55:42.760]  Right.
[55:42.760 --> 55:43.760]  Exactly.
[55:43.760 --> 55:48.880]  As a matter of fact, there's a specific part in here in our article four in the Michigan
[55:48.880 --> 55:54.920]  constitution that says, in section 23, style of all laws, the style of the laws shall be
[55:54.920 --> 55:56.720]  the people of the state of Michigan enact.
[55:56.720 --> 55:57.720]  Right.
[55:57.720 --> 55:58.720]  If they don't have that.
[55:58.720 --> 56:04.280]  And not only that, look at where they have to be passed by bill and then the bill must
[56:04.280 --> 56:06.840]  originate in one of the two houses of the legislature.
[56:06.840 --> 56:07.840]  Yeah.
[56:07.840 --> 56:09.360]  That's very similar to the Texas constitution.
[56:09.360 --> 56:10.360]  I've noticed that.
[56:10.360 --> 56:16.200]  Now, where do you, where would you know, at least in Texas, I know here they've changed
[56:16.200 --> 56:18.240]  that from 1963.
[56:18.240 --> 56:23.080]  I got a copy of the 1835 one and it's super small and it has all kinds of things in there
[56:23.080 --> 56:29.480]  about, you know, no man or set of men shall be entitled to separate privileges and then
[56:29.480 --> 56:31.640]  what do we have bar card carrying and judges for it?
[56:31.640 --> 56:32.640]  You know what I mean?
[56:32.640 --> 56:34.440]  I mean, that seems like a privilege to me, right?
[56:34.440 --> 56:35.440]  Yeah.
[56:35.440 --> 56:38.920]  Cause I didn't know that like, oh, three and a half years ago.
[56:38.920 --> 56:43.160]  And I started spending money on signs and all that to run for district judge.
[56:43.160 --> 56:44.160]  Cause it's crazy.
[56:44.160 --> 56:45.160]  I don't even know.
[56:45.160 --> 56:51.200]  And so I got a whole bunch of signs that done me no good.
[56:51.200 --> 56:55.120]  Yeah, that, well, that's the problem of living in the middle of sheeple.
[56:55.120 --> 56:56.120]  Yeah.
[56:56.120 --> 56:57.120]  Oh yeah.
[56:57.120 --> 56:58.120]  I agree.
[56:58.120 --> 56:59.120]  But yeah.
[56:59.120 --> 57:05.640]  So anybody that wants to go ahead and email me or whatnot, it's johnnyjaffa at mail.com.
[57:05.640 --> 57:06.640]  That's my new email.
[57:06.640 --> 57:12.600]  Eddie, go feel free and give me, I set it up specifically for rule of law and it, you know,
[57:12.600 --> 57:13.600]  to network and whatnot.
[57:13.600 --> 57:14.600]  So.
[57:14.600 --> 57:15.600]  Okay.
[57:15.600 --> 57:16.600]  All right.
[57:16.600 --> 57:17.600]  Johnny, well, thanks for calling in and give us any info.
[57:17.600 --> 57:18.600]  Callers.
[57:18.600 --> 57:19.600]  God bless folks.
[57:19.600 --> 57:20.600]  All right.
[57:20.600 --> 57:21.600]  Thanks man.
[57:21.600 --> 57:22.600]  All right.
[57:22.600 --> 57:25.400]  Now we're going to go to Jimmy in Maryland.
[57:25.400 --> 57:28.400]  Jimmy, I got about one minute for why I have to cut you off for the break.
[57:28.400 --> 57:29.400]  Go ahead.
[57:29.400 --> 57:35.520]  Well, Eddie, I want to start off by saying, I'm one of them guys that's missing out on
[57:35.520 --> 57:36.520]  the elections.
[57:36.520 --> 57:37.520]  I wish I lived closer.
[57:37.520 --> 57:38.520]  I wish I could be down there.
[57:38.520 --> 57:43.160]  Cause I would come and I would get people to come with me because this stuff would definitely
[57:43.160 --> 57:48.120]  need up here in Maryland, you know, to understand our rights and how to allocate it and protect
[57:48.120 --> 57:49.120]  ourselves.
[57:49.120 --> 57:51.520]  And it's just getting crazy up there, it really is.
[57:51.520 --> 57:52.520]  Yeah.
[57:52.520 --> 57:54.000]  Believe me, it's getting kind of crazy everywhere.
[57:54.000 --> 57:55.920]  I can definitely understand that.
[57:55.920 --> 58:00.360]  So man, if that's the case, then please help me get this off the ground with the crowd
[58:00.360 --> 58:01.360]  funding.
[58:01.360 --> 58:05.240]  Uh, as soon as I get the details on where to do it, I'll make sure and put it out here
[58:05.240 --> 58:06.240]  on the show.
[58:06.240 --> 58:11.360]  I'll see if I can't get it up on the rule of law website and also, uh, on the Facebook
[58:11.360 --> 58:12.360]  page.
[58:12.360 --> 58:21.420]  If anybody out there wants to friend me on Facebook, it is Tau T-A-O space law L-A-U-W.
[58:21.420 --> 58:28.520]  They forced me to change it from L-A-W, but it's Tau L-A-U-W law on Facebook.
[58:28.520 --> 58:32.440]  Or you can look at my like page Tau of law.
[58:32.440 --> 58:35.720]  I'm going to get everything posted up there on the crowd funding and trying to get the
[58:35.720 --> 58:36.960]  money together for this.
[58:36.960 --> 58:41.440]  All right, Jimmy, if you'll hold on for just a second, I'm going to take this break and
[58:41.440 --> 58:42.440]  then we'll get back to you.
[58:42.440 --> 58:43.440]  Okay?
[58:43.440 --> 58:44.440]  Okay.
[58:44.440 --> 58:46.560]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after the break.
[58:46.560 --> 58:50.360]  Five one two six four six, 1984.
[58:50.360 --> 58:55.800]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.800 --> 58:58.600]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.600 --> 59:04.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.000 --> 59:07.240]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.240 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:14.920]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.920 --> 59:18.660]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.660 --> 59:23.640]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.640 --> 59:28.360]  into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.360 --> 59:33.520]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.520 --> 59:43.960]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.960 --> 59:48.040]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.040 --> 59:49.040]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:49.040 --> 01:00:03.440]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:03.440 --> 01:00:07.880]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates, online
[01:00:07.880 --> 01:00:08.880]  at thelibertybeat.com.
[01:00:08.880 --> 01:00:13.480]  I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, March 2, 2015.
[01:00:13.480 --> 01:00:21.320]  Gold is trading at $1,213, silver at $16.60, and Bitcoin is trading around $259.
[01:00:21.320 --> 01:00:25.120]  The Liberty Beat is brought to you by Coinarch, offering innovative trading solutions for
[01:00:25.120 --> 01:00:26.120]  Bitcoin.
[01:00:26.120 --> 01:00:27.880]  Do more than just buy and sell Bitcoin.
[01:00:27.880 --> 01:00:31.560]  Use long and short positions to profit in rising and falling markets and boost your
[01:00:31.560 --> 01:00:33.240]  returns through leverage.
[01:00:33.240 --> 01:00:35.680]  Learn more at coinarch.com.
[01:00:35.680 --> 01:00:39.460]  In the news, on Sunday afternoon, the Los Angeles Police Department shot and killed
[01:00:39.460 --> 01:00:44.240]  a homeless man on the corner of East 6th Street and South San Pedro Street.
[01:00:44.240 --> 01:00:48.000]  The officers were reportedly responding to a call involving an altercation between two
[01:00:48.000 --> 01:00:50.720]  individuals when a struggle began.
[01:00:50.720 --> 01:00:55.280]  A video of the shooting shows two officers detaining one individual and four other officers
[01:00:55.280 --> 01:00:59.020]  holding down a man when one of the officers begins firing.
[01:00:59.020 --> 01:01:03.200]  The officer fires once, pauses, and then fires four more times.
[01:01:03.200 --> 01:01:05.760]  The man was pronounced dead at the scene.
[01:01:05.760 --> 01:01:12.760]  TheLibertyBeat.com will keep you up to date with late breaking details on this story.
[01:01:12.760 --> 01:01:16.320]  The U.S. government continues to persecute the remaining members of the so-called Kettle
[01:01:16.320 --> 01:01:21.760]  Falls Five, who are accused of drug manufacturing related to a cannabis grow operation they
[01:01:21.760 --> 01:01:23.840]  say was for medicinal purposes.
[01:01:23.840 --> 01:01:28.680]  Today, the government is expected to end arguments in the Kettle Falls case, in which Rhonda
[01:01:28.680 --> 01:01:34.120]  Harvey, Roland Gregg, and Michelle Gregg face drug manufacturing, distribution, conspiracy,
[01:01:34.120 --> 01:01:35.480]  and weapons charges.
[01:01:35.480 --> 01:01:38.040]  Two other defendants are no longer on trial.
[01:01:38.040 --> 01:01:42.200]  The judge has ruled that the defense cannot make mention of medical cannabis, a move that
[01:01:42.200 --> 01:01:45.340]  has sparked outrage in the medicinal cannabis community.
[01:01:45.340 --> 01:01:50.680]  The trial is expected to conclude this week.
[01:01:50.680 --> 01:01:54.720]  The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is currently accepting public comment on a
[01:01:54.720 --> 01:01:59.080]  draft version of a plan that would push American adults to receive current and retroactive
[01:01:59.080 --> 01:02:00.400]  vaccinations.
[01:02:00.400 --> 01:02:05.200]  The HHS is asking for the public's thoughts on its draft National Adult Immunization Plan
[01:02:05.200 --> 01:02:07.240]  until March 9th of this year.
[01:02:07.240 --> 01:02:12.720]  It could involve several dozen shots given to adults who need to catch up on vaccines.
[01:02:12.720 --> 01:02:17.260]  Support for Deliberty Beat comes from My Magic Mud, detox firing tooth powder, the most effective
[01:02:17.260 --> 01:02:19.200]  and affordable dental care around.
[01:02:19.200 --> 01:02:21.960]  Get a 150 application jar at MyMagicMud.com.
[01:02:21.960 --> 01:02:25.520]  Looking to promote your business or cause to tens of thousands of loyal listeners?
[01:02:25.520 --> 01:02:29.880]  Well, for a limited time only, the Liberty Beat is offering you the chance to say big
[01:02:29.880 --> 01:02:31.560]  while spreading your message.
[01:02:31.560 --> 01:02:32.560]  It's simple.
[01:02:32.560 --> 01:02:36.440]  Just sign up for three months of advertising and get your fourth month free.
[01:02:36.440 --> 01:02:38.800]  Don't miss out on this unique opportunity.
[01:02:38.800 --> 01:02:44.660]  Just visit thelibertybeat.com slash advertise and use coupon code GCN in the describe your
[01:02:44.660 --> 01:02:46.440]  company section.
[01:02:46.440 --> 01:02:51.000]  This is the Liberty Beat for Monday, March 2nd, 2015.
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:53.920]  Check out the website at thelibertybeat.com
[01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:28.320]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:28.320 --> 01:03:33.720]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:33.720 --> 01:03:36.080]  We got an hour left to go here.
[01:03:36.080 --> 01:03:38.240]  Let's get back to Jimmy in Maryland.
[01:03:38.240 --> 01:03:40.640]  All right, Jimmy, please continue.
[01:03:40.640 --> 01:03:41.640]  Okay.
[01:03:41.640 --> 01:03:45.920]  I've been calling you from time to time.
[01:03:45.920 --> 01:03:52.600]  My case comes up tomorrow, tomorrow morning, scheduled for trial.
[01:03:52.600 --> 01:04:03.440]  Now, I booked your traffic seminar and I filed a petition for injunctive relief.
[01:04:03.440 --> 01:04:08.680]  Now, I had a problem serving the prosecutor and the police officer.
[01:04:08.680 --> 01:04:09.760]  They duck and dodge.
[01:04:09.760 --> 01:04:14.640]  I hired a professional process server.
[01:04:14.640 --> 01:04:20.920]  They were unable to serve them, so what I'm going to do is have my cousin serve them tomorrow
[01:04:20.920 --> 01:04:27.080]  in the hallway and just tell the judge, you know, that it's the only way I can get them
[01:04:27.080 --> 01:04:28.080]  served.
[01:04:28.080 --> 01:04:32.160]  Does that sound like a good idea?
[01:04:32.160 --> 01:04:36.760]  Well, you can actually get a process server and do it as well.
[01:04:36.760 --> 01:04:41.320]  You'd have to look up to see who can serve in Maryland, but here in Texas, anybody over
[01:04:41.320 --> 01:04:47.040]  18 that is not a party to the case and not a convicted felon can perform service.
[01:04:47.040 --> 01:04:48.040]  Yeah.
[01:04:48.040 --> 01:04:53.040]  Yeah, because I hired a professional process server to do it, but they were unable to do
[01:04:53.040 --> 01:04:54.040]  it.
[01:04:54.040 --> 01:04:57.240]  The prosecutor wouldn't come out to step the pay-through.
[01:04:57.240 --> 01:04:58.240]  They sent somebody else out.
[01:04:58.240 --> 01:04:59.240]  Okay.
[01:04:59.240 --> 01:05:03.440]  Then you need to look and see if Maryland has a voiding service statute that makes that
[01:05:03.440 --> 01:05:05.360]  a crime.
[01:05:05.360 --> 01:05:06.640]  Okay.
[01:05:06.640 --> 01:05:12.280]  Because in some states, there are statutes that makes avoiding avoidance of service an
[01:05:12.280 --> 01:05:13.280]  actual crime.
[01:05:13.280 --> 01:05:14.280]  Okay.
[01:05:14.280 --> 01:05:15.280]  I didn't go into that.
[01:05:15.280 --> 01:05:16.280]  He avoided service.
[01:05:16.280 --> 01:05:17.280]  The police officer wasn't on duty.
[01:05:17.280 --> 01:05:18.280]  I don't know if they're telling the truth or not.
[01:05:18.280 --> 01:05:19.280]  So, since we have trial tomorrow, I know that the officer will be there, the process will
[01:05:19.280 --> 01:05:20.280]  be there.
[01:05:20.280 --> 01:05:21.280]  So, it'd be very easy to have them serve there on the spot, you know, before we go in the
[01:05:21.280 --> 01:05:22.280]  trial.
[01:05:22.280 --> 01:05:27.280]  So, that's one thing I can think of if I had another way possible to get them served.
[01:05:27.280 --> 01:05:37.040]  So, that's what my plan is going to do tomorrow.
[01:05:37.040 --> 01:05:38.040]  All right.
[01:05:38.040 --> 01:05:44.880]  Sounds like a plan, at least, because you've got it so far.
[01:05:44.880 --> 01:05:49.120]  But I would definitely, if I would look that up and see if it is a crime, if it is, I would
[01:05:49.120 --> 01:05:51.400]  immediately press charges against the attorney.
[01:05:51.400 --> 01:05:52.400]  Okay.
[01:05:52.400 --> 01:05:53.400]  Definitely.
[01:05:53.400 --> 01:06:00.720]  I'm trying to get something from the process of service company that they did make efforts,
[01:06:00.720 --> 01:06:04.640]  you know, to serve the people that haven't sent me anything yet, so I'm waiting to get
[01:06:04.640 --> 01:06:05.640]  something from them.
[01:06:05.640 --> 01:06:08.640]  You know, they have helped me out in this issue.
[01:06:08.640 --> 01:06:14.240]  Now, I got a jury trial tomorrow now.
[01:06:14.240 --> 01:06:17.520]  You mentioned about that earlier today, tonight.
[01:06:17.520 --> 01:06:27.640]  Is there any kind of particular question that you would ask in selecting, you know, as you're
[01:06:27.640 --> 01:06:30.760]  talking to the potential jurors?
[01:06:30.760 --> 01:06:36.240]  That all depends entirely on what is at stake and what type of case we're talking about
[01:06:36.240 --> 01:06:39.960]  and what it is I need to make my appeal worthwhile.
[01:06:39.960 --> 01:06:46.560]  For instance, here in Texas, in a traffic case or any misdemeanor case for which they
[01:06:46.560 --> 01:06:56.880]  assess a fine, you cannot appeal the conviction if the fine does not exceed $100, okay?
[01:06:56.880 --> 01:07:05.120]  So what I would say might seem a little bit, you know, not intuitive and definitely something
[01:07:05.120 --> 01:07:06.400]  most of you wouldn't want to do.
[01:07:06.400 --> 01:07:12.520]  For instance, I'd ask the jury, now, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, here is what the
[01:07:12.520 --> 01:07:18.760]  state is counting on, that you are stupid and that you will choose through the course
[01:07:18.760 --> 01:07:22.080]  of this trial to remain stupid.
[01:07:22.080 --> 01:07:27.760]  I'm going to try to make sure that you aren't stupid and give you information to alleviate
[01:07:27.760 --> 01:07:29.760]  you from being stupid.
[01:07:29.760 --> 01:07:34.080]  Now, why would I say something like that to the people that are supposed to find me guilty
[01:07:34.080 --> 01:07:36.040]  or innocent?
[01:07:36.040 --> 01:07:40.160]  Because if they find me guilty, I want to make darn sure that they assess more than
[01:07:40.160 --> 01:07:47.200]  $100 so I can appeal it, okay?
[01:07:47.200 --> 01:07:52.640]  So if I get them mad at me, that's most likely to get me the maximum, the $200, at least
[01:07:52.640 --> 01:07:53.640]  that's appealable.
[01:07:53.640 --> 01:07:54.640]  Okay.
[01:07:54.640 --> 01:08:01.160]  So I have that.
[01:08:01.160 --> 01:08:06.800]  So without knowing the specifics of the case and what the specific appealable rules are
[01:08:06.800 --> 01:08:10.400]  in Maryland, I'm not really sure I could answer your question well.
[01:08:10.400 --> 01:08:11.400]  Okay.
[01:08:11.400 --> 01:08:12.400]  Yeah.
[01:08:12.400 --> 01:08:16.400]  Well, this is, I was cited for, remember I told you I was riding down the road with
[01:08:16.400 --> 01:08:24.320]  a blown headlight, officer pulled me over, and they filed with a different driver's license
[01:08:24.320 --> 01:08:28.160]  that does not properly identify me, but they're going on with it.
[01:08:28.160 --> 01:08:32.400]  And I was trying to convict it, I was killing it right now in the United States Supreme
[01:08:32.400 --> 01:08:34.120]  Court.
[01:08:34.120 --> 01:08:38.960]  And I had a hearing today for a violation of probation, and they passed it until tomorrow
[01:08:38.960 --> 01:08:39.960]  after the trial.
[01:08:39.960 --> 01:08:45.600]  And I'll tell you, the way the judge acted today is almost like she knows that I'm going
[01:08:45.600 --> 01:08:51.320]  to be found guilty, and my head's going to be hers when I come to her after I'm found
[01:08:51.320 --> 01:08:52.320]  guilty tomorrow.
[01:08:52.320 --> 01:08:58.640]  I mean, it's like a catch-22, I mean, how they're, how they behave and how they handle
[01:08:58.640 --> 01:09:02.680]  things like they don't see no accountability in what they do and what they say.
[01:09:02.680 --> 01:09:08.120]  Well, of course not, that's the way they've designed the system to protect themselves
[01:09:08.120 --> 01:09:12.520]  from accountability when they violate what should be a right.
[01:09:12.520 --> 01:09:19.160]  See, here's the problem with the American justice system as it's set up and as it exists.
[01:09:19.160 --> 01:09:23.960]  Ask anyone that suffered through it and any lawyer that operates in it.
[01:09:23.960 --> 01:09:29.680]  They worship process over principle and justice.
[01:09:29.680 --> 01:09:34.080]  It does not matter that the person is innocent.
[01:09:34.080 --> 01:09:40.600]  If proper process was not followed, that's irrelevant.
[01:09:40.600 --> 01:09:46.880]  Even if it's got evidence that proves the person convicted was entirely innocent, unless
[01:09:46.880 --> 01:09:54.480]  proper process is followed, the judge will never review the evidence and issue an order
[01:09:54.480 --> 01:09:58.240]  overturning or granting a new trial.
[01:09:58.240 --> 01:10:00.640]  Do you follow?
[01:10:00.640 --> 01:10:07.480]  They worship process and procedure over substance and justice.
[01:10:07.480 --> 01:10:11.760]  That is my biggest problem with the system as it's set up.
[01:10:11.760 --> 01:10:17.920]  Okay, so this is the case that I'm going to do tomorrow.
[01:10:17.920 --> 01:10:22.440]  I'm going to go in at first, challenge the jurisdiction, especially the challenges of
[01:10:22.440 --> 01:10:23.440]  the court.
[01:10:23.440 --> 01:10:26.800]  If they're going to say something, I'm going to say I don't want to let them reflect that
[01:10:26.800 --> 01:10:28.640]  no jurisdiction has been established.
[01:10:28.640 --> 01:10:32.760]  Yeah, there's no evidence of jurisdiction that's been entered on the record.
[01:10:32.760 --> 01:10:33.760]  Right.
[01:10:33.760 --> 01:10:36.560]  I'm going to make sure I say that and I don't reflect on it.
[01:10:36.560 --> 01:10:40.280]  Make sure you refer to evidence each and every time.
[01:10:40.280 --> 01:10:45.120]  There is no evidence of jurisdiction found in the record.
[01:10:45.120 --> 01:10:48.840]  Okay, no evidence of jurisdiction found in the record.
[01:10:48.840 --> 01:10:49.840]  Gotcha.
[01:10:49.840 --> 01:10:54.400]  Yeah, remember, the problem most people have with this, and I'm trying to prevent you from
[01:10:54.400 --> 01:10:59.920]  making the same mistake, is people express their opinion of why it was wrong.
[01:10:59.920 --> 01:11:04.760]  Don't do what the court would require for it to be valid.
[01:11:04.760 --> 01:11:09.000]  That is, where is the evidence to support the determination?
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:11.400]  Well, there isn't any.
[01:11:11.400 --> 01:11:13.800]  Therefore, say there isn't any.
[01:11:13.800 --> 01:11:18.400]  Right, he's probably just going to say, oh, the court has jurisdiction.
[01:11:18.400 --> 01:11:19.400]  Exactly.
[01:11:19.400 --> 01:11:26.200]  Check and state, for the record, no evidence as to the court's jurisdiction has been put
[01:11:26.200 --> 01:11:29.360]  onto the record in any form.
[01:11:29.360 --> 01:11:35.440]  The court is simply, as a court of limited jurisdiction, that's a requirement.
[01:11:35.440 --> 01:11:43.160]  But this court is simply presuming jurisdiction without any factual evidence to support it.
[01:11:43.160 --> 01:11:44.160]  Okay.
[01:11:44.160 --> 01:11:49.880]  I'll make sure I start off with that, and then they're going to go, you know, how they
[01:11:49.880 --> 01:11:52.880]  do, they go through their notions.
[01:11:52.880 --> 01:11:58.400]  And then when it stops me, they try to give me, enter a plea, I'm going to say, does this
[01:11:58.400 --> 01:12:04.040]  court intend to make me give a, compel me to give a unconscionable plea?
[01:12:04.040 --> 01:12:05.040]  Correct.
[01:12:05.040 --> 01:12:07.360]  See what they're going to say from that.
[01:12:07.360 --> 01:12:11.200]  See, there's something else you can challenge that very few people go into challenging as
[01:12:11.200 --> 01:12:14.480]  well, and that's the stop as being an unlawful arrest.
[01:12:14.480 --> 01:12:18.360]  Remember, the stop was performed without a warrant.
[01:12:18.360 --> 01:12:24.400]  Where was the probable cause determination made that the actual stop itself was legal
[01:12:24.400 --> 01:12:26.120]  and lawful?
[01:12:26.120 --> 01:12:29.160]  That determination has never been made.
[01:12:29.160 --> 01:12:36.120]  They're simply presuming it was lawful, and there's no evidence that it was lawful either.
[01:12:36.120 --> 01:12:37.120]  No.
[01:12:37.120 --> 01:12:42.920]  As a matter of fact, they denied my motion to suppress, you know, criminal suspicion
[01:12:42.920 --> 01:12:44.760]  existed at the time of the stop.
[01:12:44.760 --> 01:12:55.680]  That was denied my motion to quash the complaint because the driver's license that I was tied
[01:12:55.680 --> 01:12:59.040]  with is not properly identified me.
[01:12:59.040 --> 01:13:01.040]  That was denied.
[01:13:01.040 --> 01:13:07.720]  What they did was they didn't amend it with my date of birth and my name and add it to
[01:13:07.720 --> 01:13:08.720]  it.
[01:13:08.720 --> 01:13:10.800]  That's all they did.
[01:13:10.800 --> 01:13:15.160]  They are free to amend a complaint as long as it's done prior to trial.
[01:13:15.160 --> 01:13:17.720]  They cannot do it during or after.
[01:13:17.720 --> 01:13:18.720]  Okay.
[01:13:18.720 --> 01:13:21.920]  But they didn't really, essentially, did you say about complaint?
[01:13:21.920 --> 01:13:22.920]  There really isn't a complaint.
[01:13:22.920 --> 01:13:25.320]  They're using a citation.
[01:13:25.320 --> 01:13:32.240]  Does Maryland statute allow that and does that allowance in statute violate a constitutional
[01:13:32.240 --> 01:13:35.200]  provision to the contrary?
[01:13:35.200 --> 01:13:38.880]  These are other things you will need to address on and for the record.
[01:13:38.880 --> 01:13:43.440]  A citation is not a valid complaint under this statute.
[01:13:43.440 --> 01:13:49.120]  This statute cannot authorize that to be a complaint because it violates this constitutional
[01:13:49.120 --> 01:13:50.120]  provision.
[01:13:50.120 --> 01:13:51.480]  You see?
[01:13:51.480 --> 01:13:56.160]  Put your blocks together, get them arranged, make sure that they stack nicely.
[01:13:56.160 --> 01:13:57.160]  Okay.
[01:13:57.160 --> 01:14:02.840]  Also, about the information, I didn't receive an information.
[01:14:02.840 --> 01:14:07.760]  Does Maryland law state that they're not required or that you aren't required to get it?
[01:14:07.760 --> 01:14:13.360]  If so, then you have to figure out what the relevance of each of those instruments are.
[01:14:13.360 --> 01:14:18.980]  Here in Texas, an information is required to be signed by the prosecuting attorney.
[01:14:18.980 --> 01:14:25.640]  That information must be based entirely upon a proper sworn complaint.
[01:14:25.640 --> 01:14:32.120]  The problem here is, is that you can't swear to a complaint in Texas because it not only
[01:14:32.120 --> 01:14:39.820]  has qualifying language, the person doing the so-called swearing doesn't always or necessarily
[01:14:39.820 --> 01:14:45.100]  have competent first-hand knowledge of the facts being alleged.
[01:14:45.100 --> 01:14:53.720]  So how can you swear to a complaint when that is the criteria upon which it is made?
[01:14:53.720 --> 01:15:00.360]  See, this is my problem with the Texas courts treating the complaint as the affidavit that
[01:15:00.360 --> 01:15:03.040]  the Constitution requires.
[01:15:03.040 --> 01:15:06.440]  It can't be sworn to.
[01:15:06.440 --> 01:15:07.440]  Okay.
[01:15:07.440 --> 01:15:18.680]  So like I said, I'm going to set them up basically and when I do get the Officer in the witness
[01:15:18.680 --> 01:15:25.800]  stand, I'm going to ask him, does he have the application that I applied for this driver's
[01:15:25.800 --> 01:15:30.560]  license with my signature on it that I agree to abide by all the laws and regulations of
[01:15:30.560 --> 01:15:31.560]  traffic?
[01:15:31.560 --> 01:15:33.000]  And of course, he's not going to have it.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  I'm thinking of prosecuting.
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:38.440]  But that's also going to allow the prosecutor to come back and make allegations that you're
[01:15:38.440 --> 01:15:40.840]  asserting that the laws don't apply to you.
[01:15:40.840 --> 01:15:48.000]  So expect that type of testimony and that type of prejudicial statement.
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:15:50.840]  Be prepared for that.
[01:15:50.840 --> 01:15:53.240]  And you can object to that very easily.
[01:15:53.240 --> 01:15:54.240]  Objection.
[01:15:54.240 --> 01:16:00.940]  The prosecutor is asserting that simply because I disagree with the application of a statute,
[01:16:00.940 --> 01:16:08.080]  not a law, but a statute, that I am saying that none of the actual laws apply.
[01:16:08.080 --> 01:16:09.560]  Well guess what, folks?
[01:16:09.560 --> 01:16:14.480]  I'm not a commercial fisherman and I have never been commercially fishing.
[01:16:14.480 --> 01:16:20.600]  Therefore, I would argue that any statutes relating to commercial fishing also do not
[01:16:20.600 --> 01:16:22.640]  apply.
[01:16:22.640 --> 01:16:32.720]  So the argument presented by the prosecution is a red herring argument.
[01:16:32.720 --> 01:16:33.720]  You follow?
[01:16:33.720 --> 01:16:34.720]  I'm following.
[01:16:34.720 --> 01:16:35.720]  Yeah.
[01:16:35.720 --> 01:16:36.720]  All right.
[01:16:36.720 --> 01:16:40.360]  Well hang on just a second and you can follow a little bit more on the other side, okay?
[01:16:40.360 --> 01:16:41.360]  Okay.
[01:16:41.360 --> 01:16:42.360]  All right, folks.
[01:16:42.360 --> 01:16:43.360]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:43.360 --> 01:16:44.360]  Give us a call.
[01:16:44.360 --> 01:16:45.360]  Give us a complaint.
[01:16:45.360 --> 01:16:46.360]  Give us a question.
[01:16:46.360 --> 01:16:52.160]  Whichever one you got, we'll try to deal with when you come up.
[01:16:52.160 --> 01:16:56.720]  Right now, y'all hang in there and we will be right back after the break.
[01:16:56.720 --> 01:17:04.840]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:17:04.840 --> 01:17:09.240]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.240 --> 01:17:13.120]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality
[01:17:13.120 --> 01:17:14.720]  coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.720 --> 01:17:18.640]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:18.640 --> 01:17:23.320]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers
[01:17:23.320 --> 01:17:24.320]  and journalists.
[01:17:24.320 --> 01:17:27.280]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:27.280 --> 01:17:32.440]  In addition, we carry popular longevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polynburst.
[01:17:32.440 --> 01:17:37.400]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition
[01:17:37.400 --> 01:17:39.560]  at 10% above wholesale and more.
[01:17:39.560 --> 01:17:43.520]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.520 --> 01:17:46.520]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:46.520 --> 01:17:51.520]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.520 --> 01:17:54.520]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.520 --> 01:18:01.160]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:01.160 --> 01:18:05.760]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:18:05.760 --> 01:18:07.180]  of nutrition.
[01:18:07.180 --> 01:18:11.920]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.920 --> 01:18:17.640]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.640 --> 01:18:23.960]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can
[01:18:23.960 --> 01:18:26.400]  provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:26.400 --> 01:18:31.160]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[01:18:31.160 --> 01:18:32.160]  we reject.
[01:18:32.160 --> 01:18:37.400]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[01:18:37.400 --> 01:18:40.280]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.280 --> 01:18:46.560]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:18:46.560 --> 01:18:47.560]  quality radio.
[01:18:47.560 --> 01:18:52.200]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.200 --> 01:18:57.760]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:18:57.760 --> 01:18:59.760]  increase your income.
[01:18:59.760 --> 01:19:01.760]  Order now.
[01:19:01.760 --> 01:19:10.760]  This is the Logos, Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:31.760 --> 01:19:38.720]  Alright folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio and we are talking with Jimmy in
[01:19:38.720 --> 01:19:39.720]  Maryland.
[01:19:39.720 --> 01:19:40.720]  Alright, Jimmy, what else you got?
[01:19:40.720 --> 01:19:47.080]  Okay, like you mentioned earlier also about the driving record, you know, the object to
[01:19:47.080 --> 01:19:48.960]  the truthfulness of it.
[01:19:48.960 --> 01:19:54.880]  No, object to it is being hearsay because whoever's testifying to it is not the person
[01:19:54.880 --> 01:19:58.360]  that entered it into the computer.
[01:19:58.360 --> 01:19:59.760]  Who's going to present it?
[01:19:59.760 --> 01:20:05.720]  The attorney cannot present it because they can't be a witness and the attorney.
[01:20:05.720 --> 01:20:11.240]  The cop can't present it because it's still hearsay.
[01:20:11.240 --> 01:20:18.280]  So who's going to present the record from the DMV as evidence when they cannot testify
[01:20:18.280 --> 01:20:22.120]  to what's in it as something they personally entered?
[01:20:22.120 --> 01:20:30.240]  Now that requires you to do three things, object as inadmissible hearsay, challenge
[01:20:30.240 --> 01:20:35.540]  the witness to answer questions relating to voir dire associated with personal knowledge
[01:20:35.540 --> 01:20:41.080]  of the data they're attempting to testify to, but do not go into specifics of the data
[01:20:41.080 --> 01:20:44.400]  itself, okay?
[01:20:44.400 --> 01:20:50.880]  And third, move to suppress any and all information related to that record.
[01:20:50.880 --> 01:20:57.440]  Okay, so I wouldn't argue, I don't argue that I didn't apply for this, like...
[01:20:57.440 --> 01:20:59.160]  No, why would you do that?
[01:20:59.160 --> 01:21:04.440]  I'm just saying, just don't, I hear what you're saying.
[01:21:04.440 --> 01:21:11.000]  They have the burden of proof, you don't have the burden of non-proof.
[01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  That's true.
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:15.880]  Okay, so, okay, I see you're saying this objective is hearsay.
[01:21:15.880 --> 01:21:17.880]  Yeah, move to suppress.
[01:21:17.880 --> 01:21:22.920]  He has no personal first-hand knowledge of the data he's testifying to, it is hearsay.
[01:21:22.920 --> 01:21:27.400]  You need to pull up any relevant Maryland case law and federal case law for that.
[01:21:27.400 --> 01:21:32.960]  Now, I've got case law for Texas and some Fed, send me an email, I'll happily send
[01:21:32.960 --> 01:21:33.960]  it to you.
[01:21:33.960 --> 01:21:34.960]  Okay, yeah.
[01:21:34.960 --> 01:21:39.040]  Well, it's something I learned how to do, how to shepherd eyes and cross-reference them.
[01:21:39.040 --> 01:21:40.040]  That's one of my weaknesses.
[01:21:40.040 --> 01:21:46.640]  Yeah, you can get anything you can about case law relating to computer data being hearsay.
[01:21:46.640 --> 01:21:50.840]  Okay, yeah, you sent me something before about that.
[01:21:50.840 --> 01:21:57.160]  Yeah, and also make darn sure that you look up the rules of evidence in Maryland dealing
[01:21:57.160 --> 01:22:04.920]  with hearsay and tell the court, I demand for the record, the court and the prosecution
[01:22:04.920 --> 01:22:12.880]  put on the record what exception to hearsay they're relying on to admit this information,
[01:22:12.880 --> 01:22:16.480]  because there won't be one.
[01:22:16.480 --> 01:22:20.320]  And if they do cite one, they're going to have a hard time drawing a correlation between
[01:22:20.320 --> 01:22:25.120]  what's being testified to and that exception, I guarantee it.
[01:22:25.120 --> 01:22:32.480]  Okay, you're ready for all of them are.
[01:22:32.480 --> 01:22:36.840]  Now, what also gets me at it is how they would try to use that fairness and based on that,
[01:22:36.840 --> 01:22:42.360]  you know, you can get students to two or three years, 180 days, you know, they always talk
[01:22:42.360 --> 01:22:44.040]  about, you know, it costs regular.
[01:22:44.040 --> 01:22:49.880]  Well, there's federal law that says you cannot be sentenced to prison or jail of any kind
[01:22:49.880 --> 01:22:51.760]  without proper assistance of counsel.
[01:22:51.760 --> 01:22:54.120]  Now, if you waived it, that's one thing.
[01:22:54.120 --> 01:22:57.880]  If they denied it to you and wouldn't grant it, that's another.
[01:22:57.880 --> 01:23:01.280]  Yeah, I waived, I'm rather than myself, I waived it.
[01:23:01.280 --> 01:23:06.680]  Well, you can do that, but you can still have counsel there in an advisory capacity.
[01:23:06.680 --> 01:23:16.480]  Okay, so like I said, the clock is really short on that now because trial is tomorrow.
[01:23:16.480 --> 01:23:17.480]  Yeah.
[01:23:17.480 --> 01:23:20.560]  I know it's too late for it now, I'm just making that point for the masses out there
[01:23:20.560 --> 01:23:21.560]  that are listening.
[01:23:21.560 --> 01:23:22.560]  Okay.
[01:23:22.560 --> 01:23:29.840]  Okay, so I'm just going to do my best and hopefully, you know, if I'm still free this
[01:23:29.840 --> 01:23:33.480]  time or next week, I'll give you a little debriefing on what happened.
[01:23:33.480 --> 01:23:34.480]  All right.
[01:23:34.480 --> 01:23:36.080]  Or I'll send you an email or something.
[01:23:36.080 --> 01:23:37.080]  That would be good.
[01:23:37.080 --> 01:23:38.080]  Yeah, I want to keep the time.
[01:23:38.080 --> 01:23:39.080]  I know you got other people that need to talk to you.
[01:23:39.080 --> 01:23:40.080]  Appreciate your time, Eddie, really.
[01:23:40.080 --> 01:23:41.080]  All right, man.
[01:23:41.080 --> 01:23:42.080]  Take care.
[01:23:42.080 --> 01:23:43.080]  Good luck.
[01:23:43.080 --> 01:23:44.080]  You too.
[01:23:44.080 --> 01:23:45.080]  All right.
[01:23:45.080 --> 01:23:46.080]  Thanks.
[01:23:46.080 --> 01:23:47.080]  Yep.
[01:23:47.080 --> 01:23:48.080]  All right.
[01:23:48.080 --> 01:23:49.080]  Now, we're going to go to Steve in Texas.
[01:23:49.080 --> 01:23:52.080]  Steve, what can we do for you?
[01:23:52.080 --> 01:23:53.080]  Yeah.
[01:23:53.080 --> 01:23:57.080]  I'm here looking at the federal rules of civil procedure.
[01:23:57.080 --> 01:24:05.080]  Now, do those rules of civil procedure, the federal rules, does that cover all the states?
[01:24:05.080 --> 01:24:10.080]  No, it covers the state if it's a federal suit.
[01:24:10.080 --> 01:24:13.080]  So that's the federal suit?
[01:24:13.080 --> 01:24:14.080]  Yeah.
[01:24:14.080 --> 01:24:15.080]  Why?
[01:24:15.080 --> 01:24:21.080]  Where is the evidence being used in a state court or a federal court or whatever procedure
[01:24:21.080 --> 01:24:22.080]  you're using?
[01:24:22.080 --> 01:24:23.080]  Let me put it that way.
[01:24:23.080 --> 01:24:29.080]  Well, I was just looking at it because, you know, like you were talking about jurisdiction
[01:24:29.080 --> 01:24:31.080]  and I was looking at...
[01:24:31.080 --> 01:24:36.080]  The federal rules can be used in the state, but they are not directly controlling over
[01:24:36.080 --> 01:24:37.080]  the state.
[01:24:37.080 --> 01:24:38.080]  Okay.
[01:24:38.080 --> 01:24:43.080]  Because here in Rule 8, it says general rules of pleading.
[01:24:43.080 --> 01:24:45.080]  A, a claim for release.
[01:24:45.080 --> 01:24:53.080]  A pleading that states a claim for release must contain, one, a short and plain statement
[01:24:53.080 --> 01:24:58.080]  of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction.
[01:24:58.080 --> 01:24:59.080]  Right.
[01:24:59.080 --> 01:25:03.080]  But that's the attorney saying this court has jurisdiction under the provisions of this
[01:25:03.080 --> 01:25:05.080]  Constitution and this law.
[01:25:05.080 --> 01:25:10.080]  That's how that jurisdiction gets established via the pleadings.
[01:25:10.080 --> 01:25:11.080]  Okay.
[01:25:11.080 --> 01:25:19.080]  And unless someone on the other side objects to that entry, it will be accepted.
[01:25:19.080 --> 01:25:22.080]  Wait a minute now.
[01:25:22.080 --> 01:25:29.080]  So, you know, you were talking to the last man about them not having evidence of jurisdiction.
[01:25:29.080 --> 01:25:30.080]  This is...
[01:25:30.080 --> 01:25:39.080]  This Rule 8 here is saying that in their claim or their affidavit, you know, in the complaint,
[01:25:39.080 --> 01:25:45.080]  that they would have to state their grounds for the court's jurisdiction.
[01:25:45.080 --> 01:25:48.080]  That's exactly what I just said they did.
[01:25:48.080 --> 01:25:54.080]  They state the grounds for the court's jurisdiction as this court has jurisdiction in this type
[01:25:54.080 --> 01:26:01.080]  of action pursuant this Constitutional provision and this area of law.
[01:26:01.080 --> 01:26:08.080]  So, you know, like if you got a ticket and they never proved you were driving, you know,
[01:26:08.080 --> 01:26:10.080]  then you're not...
[01:26:10.080 --> 01:26:11.080]  Okay.
[01:26:11.080 --> 01:26:14.080]  That is not a federal case issue.
[01:26:14.080 --> 01:26:15.080]  Right.
[01:26:15.080 --> 01:26:20.080]  So, I couldn't use the federal rules of civil procedure.
[01:26:20.080 --> 01:26:21.080]  In Texas, what I use...
[01:26:21.080 --> 01:26:24.080]  You can cite them, but they're going to ignore them.
[01:26:24.080 --> 01:26:27.080]  They're not the controlling rules within the state.
[01:26:27.080 --> 01:26:30.080]  So, the state has its own rules of civil procedure?
[01:26:30.080 --> 01:26:32.080]  Yes, it does.
[01:26:32.080 --> 01:26:33.080]  Okay.
[01:26:33.080 --> 01:26:34.080]  Okay.
[01:26:34.080 --> 01:26:36.080]  I thought those were general.
[01:26:36.080 --> 01:26:37.080]  Okay.
[01:26:37.080 --> 01:26:38.080]  They are.
[01:26:38.080 --> 01:26:41.080]  They're general to how it works in the state.
[01:26:41.080 --> 01:26:43.080]  Okay.
[01:26:43.080 --> 01:26:49.080]  That's the difference between the rules associated with a state court suit and the rules associated
[01:26:49.080 --> 01:26:53.080]  with a federal court suit.
[01:26:53.080 --> 01:26:55.080]  Okay.
[01:26:55.080 --> 01:26:56.080]  Okay.
[01:26:56.080 --> 01:26:58.080]  I'll have to look into that.
[01:26:58.080 --> 01:27:07.080]  I'd like to also mention I was looking in the Texas Government Code in Chapter 311.
[01:27:07.080 --> 01:27:08.080]  Uh-huh.
[01:27:08.080 --> 01:27:16.080]  It says, Section 311.021, intention in enactment of statute.
[01:27:16.080 --> 01:27:24.080]  In enacting a statute, it is presumed that, one, compliance with the Constitution of this
[01:27:24.080 --> 01:27:28.080]  state and the United States is intended.
[01:27:28.080 --> 01:27:29.080]  So, whenever...
[01:27:29.080 --> 01:27:35.080]  You know, I've heard people say that, you know, judges will say, you know, they don't...
[01:27:35.080 --> 01:27:38.080]  You know, they don't consider the Constitution in their court.
[01:27:38.080 --> 01:27:39.080]  That's correct.
[01:27:39.080 --> 01:27:43.080]  And that's the moment you should be objecting and demanding their dismissal.
[01:27:43.080 --> 01:27:44.080]  Right.
[01:27:44.080 --> 01:27:46.080]  And in this...
[01:27:46.080 --> 01:27:52.080]  In here, in Texas, in the Government Code in Section, you know, 311.021, it...
[01:27:52.080 --> 01:27:56.080]  You know, their own statute says they have to...
[01:27:56.080 --> 01:28:02.080]  All their statutes have to comply with the Constitution of the state.
[01:28:02.080 --> 01:28:05.080]  Well, the Government Code is not controlling over the Constitution.
[01:28:05.080 --> 01:28:08.080]  The Constitution says it has to comply.
[01:28:08.080 --> 01:28:13.080]  Article 1, Section 29.
[01:28:13.080 --> 01:28:14.080]  Okay.
[01:28:14.080 --> 01:28:17.080]  Well, you know, I'm just saying even in their own statute, it says it.
[01:28:17.080 --> 01:28:18.080]  No.
[01:28:18.080 --> 01:28:22.080]  Their own statute says it is intended.
[01:28:22.080 --> 01:28:26.080]  Doesn't say that it shall or must be.
[01:28:26.080 --> 01:28:29.080]  It says it is intended.
[01:28:29.080 --> 01:28:34.080]  Big difference.
[01:28:34.080 --> 01:28:37.080]  So they could get around that word intended.
[01:28:37.080 --> 01:28:39.080]  They always get around words.
[01:28:39.080 --> 01:28:44.080]  That is the foray of law for every attorney.
[01:28:44.080 --> 01:28:48.080]  Abuse of language.
[01:28:48.080 --> 01:28:52.080]  So I should go to the Texas Constitution.
[01:28:52.080 --> 01:28:55.080]  What was that, Article 1, Section 29?
[01:28:55.080 --> 01:28:56.080]  Yes.
[01:28:56.080 --> 01:28:57.080]  Okay.
[01:28:57.080 --> 01:29:01.080]  And incidentally, I don't...
[01:29:01.080 --> 01:29:03.080]  You know, I'm here in Austin.
[01:29:03.080 --> 01:29:11.080]  I don't have any state tags on my F-150 and I took all the stickers off and I'm traveling.
[01:29:11.080 --> 01:29:17.080]  So, you know, and they pulled me over once for...
[01:29:17.080 --> 01:29:24.080]  Because before I did that, I just kept the plates on that were expired and the expired stickers.
[01:29:24.080 --> 01:29:30.080]  And the officer cited me, but he never put in a Social Security number
[01:29:30.080 --> 01:29:34.080]  or an operator's license number because I don't have one.
[01:29:34.080 --> 01:29:38.080]  So I'm going to see what they do.
[01:29:38.080 --> 01:29:48.080]  I don't know if they'll indict me because I went down and I stamped the back of the pink slip, the pink violator's copy.
[01:29:48.080 --> 01:29:49.080]  Okay.
[01:29:49.080 --> 01:29:50.080]  Well, Steve, I'm about to go to break.
[01:29:50.080 --> 01:29:52.080]  So are you getting anything else?
[01:29:52.080 --> 01:29:54.080]  No, that I don't cover.
[01:29:54.080 --> 01:29:55.080]  All right, thanks.
[01:29:55.080 --> 01:29:57.080]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[01:29:57.080 --> 01:30:00.080]  Y'all hang in there.
[01:30:00.080 --> 01:30:04.080]  If someone wanted to tamper with your utilities or access your phone records,
[01:30:04.080 --> 01:30:08.080]  chances are they could do it pretty easily unless you know this tip.
[01:30:08.080 --> 01:30:13.080]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details.
[01:30:13.080 --> 01:30:20.080]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:20.080 --> 01:30:21.080]  That's creepy.
[01:30:21.080 --> 01:30:23.080]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:23.080 --> 01:30:26.080]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:26.080 --> 01:30:33.080]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:33.080 --> 01:30:37.080]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:37.080 --> 01:30:40.080]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:40.080 --> 01:30:43.080]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:43.080 --> 01:30:50.080]  A few years ago, a hacker accessed my phone and banking records using my name, Social Security number and date of birth.
[01:30:50.080 --> 01:30:54.080]  Nowadays, such information is available all too easily from the Internet.
[01:30:54.080 --> 01:31:00.080]  I wised up after that and instructed my bank and utilities to add a pass question to my account.
[01:31:00.080 --> 01:31:06.080]  Now a note in my file instructs agents to ask a simple question to verify that it's really me on the line.
[01:31:06.080 --> 01:31:13.080]  I gave each company a different question that can't be easily guessed or researched online and that only I know the answer to.
[01:31:13.080 --> 01:31:17.080]  Those hackers will never guess the name of the first boy I had a crush on.
[01:31:17.080 --> 01:31:22.080]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:27.080 --> 01:31:32.080]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:32.080 --> 01:31:34.080]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:34.080 --> 01:31:39.080]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:39.080 --> 01:31:42.080]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:42.080 --> 01:31:45.080]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:45.080 --> 01:31:47.080]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:47.080 --> 01:31:50.080]  I'm a New York City correction office. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:50.080 --> 01:31:54.080]  I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:54.080 --> 01:31:57.080]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:31:57.080 --> 01:32:02.080]  At HempUSA.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world,
[01:32:02.080 --> 01:32:06.080]  detoxifying, self-healing, while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:32:06.080 --> 01:32:12.080]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest selling product, micro plant powder.
[01:32:12.080 --> 01:32:19.080]  Our micro plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc, and silica to help rebuild the immune system
[01:32:19.080 --> 01:32:21.080]  and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:32:21.080 --> 01:32:26.080]  Micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:32:26.080 --> 01:32:30.080]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at HempUSA.org.
[01:32:30.080 --> 01:32:34.080]  And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:32:34.080 --> 01:32:39.080]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:32:39.080 --> 01:32:42.080]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:32:42.080 --> 01:32:49.080]  Please visit us at HempUSA.org or call 908-691-2608.
[01:32:49.080 --> 01:32:52.080]  That's 908-691-2608.
[01:32:52.080 --> 01:32:57.080]  See what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you at HempUSA.org.
[01:32:57.080 --> 01:33:06.080]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:06.080 --> 01:33:24.080]  All right, folks, we are back, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:24.080 --> 01:33:27.080]  We are in the bottom of the second hour.
[01:33:27.080 --> 01:33:30.080]  So let's go to Jerry in Connecticut.
[01:33:30.080 --> 01:33:32.080]  Jerry, what can we do for you?
[01:33:32.080 --> 01:33:34.080]  Hey, how's it going, Eddie?
[01:33:34.080 --> 01:33:36.080]  Going great.
[01:33:36.080 --> 01:33:41.080]  I recently been listening to your show about traveling, and the other day I was traveling to New York.
[01:33:41.080 --> 01:33:46.080]  And I purposely didn't bring any toll money because I was traveling.
[01:33:46.080 --> 01:33:57.080]  And as I got to the toll booth, the operator, he gave me a ticket and saying that if I got two or more tickets, they would summons me to court.
[01:33:57.080 --> 01:34:06.080]  So I was wondering what process should I go through to get rid of these tickets to prove that I was traveling or whatnot?
[01:34:06.080 --> 01:34:14.080]  Well, first off, what do you know about going to court and fighting these battles?
[01:34:14.080 --> 01:34:17.080]  Not too much.
[01:34:17.080 --> 01:34:18.080]  Okay.
[01:34:18.080 --> 01:34:24.080]  What do you know about the rules and regulations they use to govern the toll roads in Connecticut and New York?
[01:34:24.080 --> 01:34:28.080]  Well, I do know that, you know, they're only for the tax drivers.
[01:34:28.080 --> 01:34:31.080]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:34:31.080 --> 01:34:32.080]  All right.
[01:34:32.080 --> 01:34:34.080]  I'm not asking what you think you know.
[01:34:34.080 --> 01:34:43.080]  I'm asking you how much you know about the rules and regulations they have in place governing those things.
[01:34:43.080 --> 01:34:45.080]  Not too much information.
[01:34:45.080 --> 01:34:46.080]  Okay.
[01:34:46.080 --> 01:34:58.080]  So how are you going to use what you know to offset what they think you are required to do?
[01:34:58.080 --> 01:35:02.080]  By showing them what the Constitution says.
[01:35:02.080 --> 01:35:04.080]  And how do you intend to do that?
[01:35:04.080 --> 01:35:16.080]  How does this suddenly become a constitutional argument versus a legally binding through rules and regulation versus private rights argument?
[01:35:16.080 --> 01:35:17.080]  I'm not too sure.
[01:35:17.080 --> 01:35:19.080]  Exactly my point.
[01:35:19.080 --> 01:35:28.080]  You have started a fight that you have no skills and preparation to win.
[01:35:28.080 --> 01:35:29.080]  Okay.
[01:35:29.080 --> 01:35:33.080]  It is one thing to know and understand you have rights.
[01:35:33.080 --> 01:35:40.080]  It is another thing entirely to know how to properly apply and protect them.
[01:35:40.080 --> 01:35:44.080]  You're asking me to tell you how to fight this in Connecticut.
[01:35:44.080 --> 01:35:46.080]  Man, I don't live in Connecticut.
[01:35:46.080 --> 01:35:47.080]  I don't live in New York.
[01:35:47.080 --> 01:35:49.080]  I don't study their statutes.
[01:35:49.080 --> 01:35:54.080]  I know Connecticut statutes are the foundational basis for Texas statutes.
[01:35:54.080 --> 01:35:56.080]  That's as far as I know about them.
[01:35:56.080 --> 01:36:02.080]  But how far they've deviated from one another in certain areas, I couldn't begin to tell you.
[01:36:02.080 --> 01:36:10.080]  So the process and procedure, again, is based entirely on what type of offense that is up there.
[01:36:10.080 --> 01:36:14.080]  Is it civil or is it criminal not to pay a toll on the toll road?
[01:36:14.080 --> 01:36:15.080]  I don't know.
[01:36:15.080 --> 01:36:18.080]  Is it one in New York and different in Connecticut or vice versa?
[01:36:18.080 --> 01:36:21.080]  I don't know that either.
[01:36:21.080 --> 01:36:24.080]  This is what I keep trying to get you to understand, folks.
[01:36:24.080 --> 01:36:30.080]  Do not go picking a fight you have not practiced to fight back on.
[01:36:30.080 --> 01:36:32.080]  Please don't do that.
[01:36:32.080 --> 01:36:39.080]  I understand that you are hungry to get your rights back and to do what you know you have every right to do,
[01:36:39.080 --> 01:36:46.080]  but you have to remember that there are evil forces in place waiting to ensnare you to their belief system
[01:36:46.080 --> 01:36:51.080]  and steal from you and abuse you in the process of getting there.
[01:36:51.080 --> 01:36:57.080]  You better understand how to fight them when you start this.
[01:36:57.080 --> 01:37:00.080]  Going out and jumping in is like you've done.
[01:37:00.080 --> 01:37:07.080]  That's kind of like calling the suicide hotline after you've stuck the gun in your mouth and pulled the trigger.
[01:37:07.080 --> 01:37:08.080]  I hear you.
[01:37:08.080 --> 01:37:09.080]  Okay.
[01:37:09.080 --> 01:37:14.080]  Study, research, learn, then try to apply.
[01:37:14.080 --> 01:37:16.080]  That's the rules.
[01:37:16.080 --> 01:37:17.080]  Not my rules.
[01:37:17.080 --> 01:37:19.080]  It's just the way it works.
[01:37:19.080 --> 01:37:25.080]  The only thing I can say in response to your question of what do you do, that's where you start.
[01:37:25.080 --> 01:37:31.080]  You read all the statutes and everything and learn what they're trying to say is required and who's required to do it,
[01:37:31.080 --> 01:37:35.080]  and then you try to find the proof and evidence that that isn't you.
[01:37:35.080 --> 01:37:38.080]  Then that's what you take to court.
[01:37:38.080 --> 01:37:39.080]  Okay.
[01:37:39.080 --> 01:37:40.080]  I did do some research, though.
[01:37:40.080 --> 01:37:49.080]  I did read the state laws and it did say, you know, people who are in a vehicle and are using the roads for commerce.
[01:37:49.080 --> 01:37:55.080]  It specifically said that those that are using the roads for commerce.
[01:37:55.080 --> 01:37:56.080]  Correct.
[01:37:56.080 --> 01:38:00.080]  And people who are in vehicles and are carrying passengers from one destination to another.
[01:38:00.080 --> 01:38:01.080]  Okay.
[01:38:01.080 --> 01:38:08.080]  So what's the definition of a passenger?
[01:38:08.080 --> 01:38:09.080]  I'm not sure.
[01:38:09.080 --> 01:38:14.080]  What's the definition of carry?
[01:38:14.080 --> 01:38:15.080]  I'm not sure as well.
[01:38:15.080 --> 01:38:16.080]  Exactly.
[01:38:16.080 --> 01:38:19.080]  You're not following the rabbit trails in what you read.
[01:38:19.080 --> 01:38:23.080]  That's why you can't superficially read them and understand them.
[01:38:23.080 --> 01:38:31.080]  Every word or phrase in a statute is a rabbit trail that has to be followed to its end.
[01:38:31.080 --> 01:38:37.080]  Failure to do that is failure to jump to conclusions and have insufficient,
[01:38:37.080 --> 01:38:46.080]  incorrect or not enough information to base your facts on.
[01:38:46.080 --> 01:38:47.080]  Okay.
[01:38:47.080 --> 01:38:54.080]  And one more thing, I also did some research on cases that were brought about Supreme Court.
[01:38:54.080 --> 01:38:57.080]  What Supreme Court?
[01:38:57.080 --> 01:38:59.080]  The Supreme Court in New York.
[01:38:59.080 --> 01:39:11.080]  It was a federal case in New York in like 1852 where a passenger was traveling to go do church.
[01:39:11.080 --> 01:39:17.080]  And he took it to the Supreme Court and he won his case because the case said that he was traveling
[01:39:17.080 --> 01:39:24.080]  and he wasn't using the road as commerce and he was just trying to get to church to do service.
[01:39:24.080 --> 01:39:27.080]  So he won that case and that case was in New York.
[01:39:27.080 --> 01:39:28.080]  Okay.
[01:39:28.080 --> 01:39:30.080]  So where's the citations that you're getting?
[01:39:30.080 --> 01:39:34.080]  Are they Connecticut or are they New York?
[01:39:34.080 --> 01:39:37.080]  The citation I'm getting, I'll repeat that.
[01:39:37.080 --> 01:39:41.080]  Who issued the citation you're talking about, Connecticut or New York?
[01:39:41.080 --> 01:39:43.080]  New York.
[01:39:43.080 --> 01:39:44.080]  You're positive.
[01:39:44.080 --> 01:39:45.080]  I'm positive, yes.
[01:39:45.080 --> 01:39:46.080]  Okay.
[01:39:46.080 --> 01:39:51.080]  Then make sure to complete your research on that case.
[01:39:51.080 --> 01:39:55.080]  That case needs to be shepardized and it needs to be verified,
[01:39:55.080 --> 01:40:03.080]  meaning you need a copy of the entire case, not just a blurb out of it, but the whole thing.
[01:40:03.080 --> 01:40:08.080]  You cannot go to court on any case with just a cite from the case.
[01:40:08.080 --> 01:40:13.080]  You've got to have the whole case so it can be read in context by the court
[01:40:13.080 --> 01:40:17.080]  and the other side if you're going to use it for argument.
[01:40:17.080 --> 01:40:18.080]  Okay.
[01:40:18.080 --> 01:40:21.080]  And how about a legal notice?
[01:40:21.080 --> 01:40:23.080]  Should I also look into that?
[01:40:23.080 --> 01:40:26.080]  Legal notice of what?
[01:40:26.080 --> 01:40:33.080]  A legal notice to send to the company that gave me a citation or the ticket.
[01:40:33.080 --> 01:40:37.080]  That depends on what you intend to put in this legal notice.
[01:40:37.080 --> 01:40:39.080]  What are you telling them?
[01:40:39.080 --> 01:40:45.080]  I wanted to tell them which laws they're violating in the Constitution and then, you know...
[01:40:45.080 --> 01:40:49.080]  Well, the thing is, are they a private company contracted by the state
[01:40:49.080 --> 01:40:52.080]  or are they actually a state agency?
[01:40:52.080 --> 01:40:54.080]  They're a private facility.
[01:40:54.080 --> 01:40:55.080]  Okay.
[01:40:55.080 --> 01:41:01.080]  Are they acting under legal authority from the government of New York?
[01:41:01.080 --> 01:41:02.080]  Yes.
[01:41:02.080 --> 01:41:03.080]  Okay.
[01:41:03.080 --> 01:41:08.080]  Then addressing them will not help you.
[01:41:08.080 --> 01:41:15.080]  Okay.
[01:41:15.080 --> 01:41:18.080]  Now, you can point it out to them all day long,
[01:41:18.080 --> 01:41:26.080]  but they're going to run to the state to protect them even if they're wrong.
[01:41:26.080 --> 01:41:27.080]  Okay.
[01:41:27.080 --> 01:41:28.080]  All right.
[01:41:28.080 --> 01:41:30.080]  So be aware of that.
[01:41:30.080 --> 01:41:33.080]  Until you get the case law that proves everything you need,
[01:41:33.080 --> 01:41:37.080]  and there will be more than one case, don't trust just one,
[01:41:37.080 --> 01:41:40.080]  find other cases that cite the case you're talking about
[01:41:40.080 --> 01:41:43.080]  and are on point with the same subject matter,
[01:41:43.080 --> 01:41:47.080]  and then you've got your list of authorities that the court has to pay attention to
[01:41:47.080 --> 01:41:51.080]  if and when you ever go.
[01:41:51.080 --> 01:41:52.080]  Okay.
[01:41:52.080 --> 01:41:56.080]  And how about a summons?
[01:41:56.080 --> 01:42:00.080]  From what I've been told, I'm told that summons can only occur
[01:42:00.080 --> 01:42:04.080]  if there is a jury indictment.
[01:42:04.080 --> 01:42:05.080]  No.
[01:42:05.080 --> 01:42:13.080]  A summons is by definition a writ from a court commanding someone to appear
[01:42:13.080 --> 01:42:19.080]  before the court to answer to an accusation or to provide the court with information
[01:42:19.080 --> 01:42:24.080]  as to why they should not be required to respond.
[01:42:24.080 --> 01:42:30.080]  By legal definition, that's what a summons is.
[01:42:30.080 --> 01:42:31.080]  Okay.
[01:42:31.080 --> 01:42:35.080]  There's no grand jury or anything involved because the whole reason for the summons
[01:42:35.080 --> 01:42:42.080]  is to see if there's any grounds to move forward for that purpose.
[01:42:42.080 --> 01:42:47.080]  Okay.
[01:42:47.080 --> 01:42:48.080]  All right.
[01:42:48.080 --> 01:42:49.080]  Thank you for the information.
[01:42:49.080 --> 01:42:50.080]  Yes, sir.
[01:42:50.080 --> 01:42:51.080]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:42:51.080 --> 01:42:52.080]  Appreciate it.
[01:42:52.080 --> 01:42:53.080]  You too.
[01:42:53.080 --> 01:42:54.080]  All right.
[01:42:54.080 --> 01:42:55.080]  All right.
[01:42:55.080 --> 01:42:57.080]  Now we're going to go to Robert.
[01:42:57.080 --> 01:43:00.080]  I don't know where Robert is.
[01:43:00.080 --> 01:43:03.080]  Robert, I got about 30 seconds for a month to cut you off to go to break,
[01:43:03.080 --> 01:43:04.080]  but I can bring you back after.
[01:43:04.080 --> 01:43:07.080]  What do you got?
[01:43:07.080 --> 01:43:08.080]  Hello?
[01:43:08.080 --> 01:43:09.080]  Hello.
[01:43:09.080 --> 01:43:10.080]  Yeah.
[01:43:10.080 --> 01:43:12.080]  Okay.
[01:43:12.080 --> 01:43:15.080]  Well, 30 seconds is a lot of time, but...
[01:43:15.080 --> 01:43:17.080]  Well, we can go after the break.
[01:43:17.080 --> 01:43:21.080]  I'm just saying I've only got 30 seconds before a month to cut you off to go to break.
[01:43:21.080 --> 01:43:22.080]  I understand.
[01:43:22.080 --> 01:43:27.080]  Well, I got a speeding ticket on the 26th of December,
[01:43:27.080 --> 01:43:33.080]  and I tried to file my motion either for dismiss or lack of subject matter,
[01:43:33.080 --> 01:43:40.080]  with the clerk slash alternate judge, and the judge was sitting there as well,
[01:43:40.080 --> 01:43:41.080]  and they denied.
[01:43:41.080 --> 01:43:43.080]  They said they weren't going to file it up there.
[01:43:43.080 --> 01:43:44.080]  Okay.
[01:43:44.080 --> 01:43:45.080]  Well, hang on a second, Robert.
[01:43:45.080 --> 01:43:47.080]  I don't know if anybody can hear what you're saying over the music,
[01:43:47.080 --> 01:43:49.080]  so we'll cover that again when we get back.
[01:43:49.080 --> 01:43:50.080]  All right, folks.
[01:43:50.080 --> 01:43:52.080]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:52.080 --> 01:43:55.080]  We are coming up on our last segment here, so y'all hang on,
[01:43:55.080 --> 01:44:00.080]  and we will be right back after this break.
[01:44:00.080 --> 01:44:04.080]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.080 --> 01:44:05.080]  Boring!
[01:44:05.080 --> 01:44:07.080]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.080 --> 01:44:08.080]  What?
[01:44:08.080 --> 01:44:13.080]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.080 --> 01:44:16.080]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[01:44:16.080 --> 01:44:19.080]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.080 --> 01:44:22.080]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease
[01:44:22.080 --> 01:44:25.080]  is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.080 --> 01:44:29.080]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity,
[01:44:29.080 --> 01:44:30.080]  but there is hope.
[01:44:30.080 --> 01:44:32.080]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[01:44:32.080 --> 01:44:36.080]  and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.080 --> 01:44:39.080]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading
[01:44:39.080 --> 01:44:43.080]  and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.080 --> 01:44:46.080]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[01:44:46.080 --> 01:44:50.080]  then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.080 --> 01:44:55.080]  or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.080 --> 01:44:57.080]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include
[01:44:57.080 --> 01:45:01.080]  impairment in enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.080 --> 01:45:04.080]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.080 --> 01:45:08.080]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[01:45:08.080 --> 01:45:13.080]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how
[01:45:13.080 --> 01:45:16.080]  in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.080 --> 01:45:19.080]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.080 --> 01:45:23.080]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.080 --> 01:45:28.080]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.080 --> 01:45:31.080]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.080 --> 01:45:34.080]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.080 --> 01:45:39.080]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.080 --> 01:45:43.080]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.080 --> 01:45:47.080]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:47.080 --> 01:45:52.080]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.080 --> 01:45:56.080]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner,
[01:45:56.080 --> 01:46:01.080]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:01.080 --> 01:46:23.080]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:23.080 --> 01:46:27.080]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking with Robert.
[01:46:27.080 --> 01:46:29.080]  All right, Robert, please go ahead.
[01:46:29.080 --> 01:46:33.080]  Okay, okay, well, like I said, it all started on December 26th,
[01:46:33.080 --> 01:46:35.080]  and I got a speeding ticket.
[01:46:35.080 --> 01:46:39.080]  Of course, I wasn't speeding or going fast as he alleged,
[01:46:39.080 --> 01:46:42.080]  but either way, I just wanted you to know that you'd be happy to know
[01:46:42.080 --> 01:46:47.080]  I never gave him a license or proof of insurance, any of that.
[01:46:47.080 --> 01:46:51.080]  But at any rate, so I went down that week,
[01:46:51.080 --> 01:46:56.080]  and I filed criminal charges with the DA on the four officers
[01:46:56.080 --> 01:47:00.080]  because they called four units out there on me,
[01:47:00.080 --> 01:47:03.080]  and aggravated assault, aggravated kidnapping, et cetera.
[01:47:03.080 --> 01:47:06.080]  I turned him into the DA, and he called me on the phone.
[01:47:06.080 --> 01:47:11.080]  He said that he just didn't have the resources to do anything about it,
[01:47:11.080 --> 01:47:16.080]  so I didn't file against him with the district judge
[01:47:16.080 --> 01:47:19.080]  because he didn't want to do his duty.
[01:47:19.080 --> 01:47:23.080]  So meanwhile, I'm going back over to the municipal court for my TIR,
[01:47:23.080 --> 01:47:26.080]  you know, for oath of office and everything,
[01:47:26.080 --> 01:47:29.080]  and the secretary is not the one again to me.
[01:47:29.080 --> 01:47:33.080]  The police department was the one who was trying to give it to me,
[01:47:33.080 --> 01:47:37.080]  and I did get one interesting thing on that PIR
[01:47:37.080 --> 01:47:40.080]  because I requested the Title 37 certification.
[01:47:40.080 --> 01:47:42.080]  Of course, I figured they wouldn't give it to me,
[01:47:42.080 --> 01:47:47.080]  but the guy gives me a paper saying that they weren't required
[01:47:47.080 --> 01:47:51.080]  to have any Title 37 certification to enforce the transportation code
[01:47:51.080 --> 01:47:54.080]  in the city of Hereford.
[01:47:54.080 --> 01:47:56.080]  So I thought that was kind of funny
[01:47:56.080 --> 01:47:59.080]  that he gave me actual papers saying that, you know,
[01:47:59.080 --> 01:48:01.080]  he wasn't required or they weren't required
[01:48:01.080 --> 01:48:04.080]  to have that certification in the city of Hereford.
[01:48:04.080 --> 01:48:09.080]  But anyway, I went to the municipal court
[01:48:09.080 --> 01:48:13.080]  to try to find my motion to dismiss
[01:48:13.080 --> 01:48:16.080]  the challenging subject matter jurisdiction,
[01:48:16.080 --> 01:48:19.080]  and the alternate judge takes it from my hand.
[01:48:19.080 --> 01:48:21.080]  She says, well, you can't file that here.
[01:48:21.080 --> 01:48:24.080]  And I said, well, ma'am, you're supposed to file all documents here.
[01:48:24.080 --> 01:48:26.080]  You are the clerk of the court. Are you not?
[01:48:26.080 --> 01:48:27.080]  And she goes, yes.
[01:48:27.080 --> 01:48:30.080]  I said, well, you're supposed to file that here.
[01:48:30.080 --> 01:48:32.080]  And then the judge says, let me see that.
[01:48:32.080 --> 01:48:34.080]  And the judge is sitting across from her.
[01:48:34.080 --> 01:48:36.080]  She says, oh, no, you can't file that here.
[01:48:36.080 --> 01:48:38.080]  And she threw it back on the desk.
[01:48:38.080 --> 01:48:41.080]  And I said, well, are you sure you guys want to go that route?
[01:48:41.080 --> 01:48:43.080]  And she says, yeah, well, you're not going to file that here.
[01:48:43.080 --> 01:48:48.080]  So I went ahead and filed criminal charges against them with the DA.
[01:48:48.080 --> 01:48:53.080]  And then, you know, I went ahead and sent a certified bill
[01:48:53.080 --> 01:48:56.080]  and filed it, then went back later with a witness
[01:48:56.080 --> 01:48:59.080]  and got a verified copy that it was filed.
[01:48:59.080 --> 01:49:05.080]  Well, the clerk or the clerk slash alternate judge
[01:49:05.080 --> 01:49:09.080]  handed me a pre-trial, you know, paper for pre-trial.
[01:49:09.080 --> 01:49:10.080]  And I showed up at that.
[01:49:10.080 --> 01:49:13.080]  And that was a joke in itself, in and of itself.
[01:49:13.080 --> 01:49:20.080]  And the city attorney, the CYA, asked me to plead.
[01:49:20.080 --> 01:49:22.080]  You know, so I said, well, are you a judge?
[01:49:22.080 --> 01:49:24.080]  And he goes, well, we're done here.
[01:49:24.080 --> 01:49:26.080]  And I said, no, we are not done here.
[01:49:26.080 --> 01:49:27.080]  I said, are you a judge?
[01:49:27.080 --> 01:49:30.080]  I said, because you're asking to plead for me and you're not a judge, are you?
[01:49:30.080 --> 01:49:34.080]  And he goes, look, I'm just telling you what you need to do, blah, blah, blah, blah.
[01:49:34.080 --> 01:49:35.080]  And I said, well, okay.
[01:49:35.080 --> 01:49:40.080]  He says, well, you know, you can either appeal it, you can do this and you can do that,
[01:49:40.080 --> 01:49:42.080]  you know, giving me more legal advice.
[01:49:42.080 --> 01:49:45.080]  And I said, well, we're going to court on this either way.
[01:49:45.080 --> 01:49:46.080]  And I recorded it.
[01:49:46.080 --> 01:49:48.080]  Well, that's what you should have said when you said,
[01:49:48.080 --> 01:49:50.080]  I'm just trying to tell you what you need to do.
[01:49:50.080 --> 01:49:54.080]  You said, whoa, so you are now my legal counsel providing me legal advice.
[01:49:54.080 --> 01:49:58.080]  Then I move that you disqualify yourself from this case.
[01:49:58.080 --> 01:49:59.080]  Yeah.
[01:49:59.080 --> 01:50:05.080]  Because I didn't hire you and you've abdicated your position as a prosecutor.
[01:50:05.080 --> 01:50:06.080]  Yeah.
[01:50:06.080 --> 01:50:12.080]  Well, either way, I'm going to file criminal charges against him for impersonating a judge
[01:50:12.080 --> 01:50:15.080]  because, you know, that's what he was trying to do.
[01:50:15.080 --> 01:50:19.080]  Yeah, impersonating a judicial officer.
[01:50:19.080 --> 01:50:20.080]  Exactly.
[01:50:20.080 --> 01:50:23.080]  So anyway, where I stand now is on the force.
[01:50:23.080 --> 01:50:27.080]  I have to go, you know, that's my prior date, which is this Wednesday.
[01:50:27.080 --> 01:50:33.080]  Now, the only thing I could put in was, you know, my motion, you know, to challenge a jurisdiction,
[01:50:33.080 --> 01:50:41.080]  you know, motion to dismiss and then also I tried to get a continuance, you know,
[01:50:41.080 --> 01:50:45.080]  before the pre-trial and she said, oh, this is interesting too.
[01:50:45.080 --> 01:50:48.080]  She said, well, I need to read that first before I file it.
[01:50:48.080 --> 01:50:50.080]  And I said, don't mind if you're supposed to file it then.
[01:50:50.080 --> 01:50:53.080]  If you want to make a judgment on it, you may do it after that.
[01:50:53.080 --> 01:50:57.080]  But, you know, you're going to do what you're going to do evidently.
[01:50:57.080 --> 01:50:58.080]  So she sat there, read it.
[01:50:58.080 --> 01:51:01.080]  She goes, I'm going to deny this.
[01:51:01.080 --> 01:51:03.080]  And then she said, I'm going to file it now.
[01:51:03.080 --> 01:51:10.080]  And so she files it and she gets the date wrong and then she makes copies and gives them back to me.
[01:51:10.080 --> 01:51:13.080]  Well, then she goes, oops, I got the date wrong.
[01:51:13.080 --> 01:51:19.080]  So she takes her pen after she files it and she, you know, alters the date on the document.
[01:51:19.080 --> 01:51:24.080]  Well, you know, I said, you're not supposed to do that.
[01:51:24.080 --> 01:51:26.080]  And she's like, well, I'm going to do it anyway.
[01:51:26.080 --> 01:51:27.080]  And I said, well, okay.
[01:51:27.080 --> 01:51:30.080]  You know, I said, you know, we all got decisions to make.
[01:51:30.080 --> 01:51:31.080]  And she goes, well, you know.
[01:51:31.080 --> 01:51:34.080]  Now, when was this document stamped?
[01:51:34.080 --> 01:51:36.080]  It was, she stamped it.
[01:51:36.080 --> 01:51:44.080]  It was on the third of this last month, I believe.
[01:51:44.080 --> 01:51:46.080]  Is when it was filed.
[01:51:46.080 --> 01:51:47.080]  You know, when it was filed.
[01:51:47.080 --> 01:51:49.080]  But she marked on the second.
[01:51:49.080 --> 01:51:50.080]  She marked it the second.
[01:51:50.080 --> 01:51:54.080]  And then she altered it by marking it back to the third.
[01:51:54.080 --> 01:51:57.080]  But this was after it had been stamped and filed already.
[01:51:57.080 --> 01:52:07.080]  But she made a decision on it as alternate judge before she decided to take it and stamp it and verify it.
[01:52:07.080 --> 01:52:12.080]  She's not authorized to do any such thing.
[01:52:12.080 --> 01:52:19.080]  She is not, if she is not the judge assigned to the case, she is not supposed to be making rulings on anything in it.
[01:52:19.080 --> 01:52:20.080]  Exactly.
[01:52:20.080 --> 01:52:21.080]  That's what I told her.
[01:52:21.080 --> 01:52:28.080]  Not only that, she can't make a ruling on a document that isn't properly filed in before the court, even if she is the judge.
[01:52:28.080 --> 01:52:30.080]  That's what I told her.
[01:52:30.080 --> 01:52:33.080]  But, you know, she goes, well, I'm going to rule on it anyway.
[01:52:33.080 --> 01:52:34.080]  Okay.
[01:52:34.080 --> 01:52:42.080]  File motions to disqualify both of these judges for conspiracy to commit fraud, denial of due process,
[01:52:42.080 --> 01:52:51.080]  abuse of official capacity, official oppression, and violation of every judicial canon dealing with fair and impartiality.
[01:52:51.080 --> 01:52:56.080]  Everything they did was absolutely illegal.
[01:52:56.080 --> 01:53:02.080]  Yeah, but see, this would be filed in the municipal court, I'm assuming?
[01:53:02.080 --> 01:53:03.080]  Or do I take it...
[01:53:03.080 --> 01:53:06.080]  You're going to file the motion to disqualify there, yes.
[01:53:06.080 --> 01:53:12.080]  But you're going to make darn sure that you CC and send registered mail, return receipt request,
[01:53:12.080 --> 01:53:19.080]  and a copy of that motion to disqualify to the head administrative judge of whatever district you're in.
[01:53:19.080 --> 01:53:20.080]  Okay.
[01:53:20.080 --> 01:53:21.080]  So that would be...
[01:53:21.080 --> 01:53:22.080]  Okay.
[01:53:22.080 --> 01:53:23.080]  Where I file...
[01:53:23.080 --> 01:53:24.080]  Okay.
[01:53:24.080 --> 01:53:29.080]  Yeah, it's just that the time has come upon me, and, you know, that's the problem most of us have, I guess,
[01:53:29.080 --> 01:53:34.080]  is that we have to work and take care of business and try to fight these things.
[01:53:34.080 --> 01:53:36.080]  And I guess that's what they're counting on.
[01:53:36.080 --> 01:53:38.080]  That's exactly what they're counting on.
[01:53:38.080 --> 01:53:42.080]  Get you too busy having to live to fight.
[01:53:42.080 --> 01:53:43.080]  Yeah.
[01:53:43.080 --> 01:53:52.080]  But either way, if I don't have time, because, you know, it's Wednesday, and man, I hate to say this,
[01:53:52.080 --> 01:53:57.080]  but my house is so cold, my printer won't even print out.
[01:53:57.080 --> 01:54:04.080]  And, you know, so I mean, I've tried, I've tried, you know, doing stuff, I just can't do it because the house is so cold.
[01:54:04.080 --> 01:54:09.080]  But either way, could I call for their refusal at trial?
[01:54:09.080 --> 01:54:11.080]  Just verbally, I guess I could.
[01:54:11.080 --> 01:54:16.080]  I mean, I know it probably won't do any good because I've done this before, you know, and they,
[01:54:16.080 --> 01:54:19.080]  well, we're going to deny that either way, you know, that's what they usually say.
[01:54:19.080 --> 01:54:20.080]  Right.
[01:54:20.080 --> 01:54:23.080]  But I'm recording everything on audio.
[01:54:23.080 --> 01:54:28.080]  So I have everything they've done, I've recorded on audio, even when I picked up the PIRs.
[01:54:28.080 --> 01:54:35.080]  And like when I like to present the PIR with the city secretary, the city manager comes out,
[01:54:35.080 --> 01:54:38.080]  I know this guy, I've had to deal with him before.
[01:54:38.080 --> 01:54:41.080]  And he said it right in front of me, you know.
[01:54:41.080 --> 01:54:44.080]  And so, you know, I'm getting the attitude from them.
[01:54:44.080 --> 01:54:51.080]  And I still haven't got anything, any word from the district, you know, the judge here, the district judge on, you know,
[01:54:51.080 --> 01:54:57.080]  whether they've filed or whether he's done anything, I guess, DA or anyone else, you know,
[01:54:57.080 --> 01:54:59.080]  with the criminal complaints I've given them.
[01:54:59.080 --> 01:55:07.080]  So I guess I'm going to next file criminal complaints to get the district judge with the DA,
[01:55:07.080 --> 01:55:11.080]  which will leave me no recourse but to go for the grand jury myself.
[01:55:11.080 --> 01:55:16.080]  Well, what you need to do is all of these criminal accusations you make against these people,
[01:55:16.080 --> 01:55:26.080]  make sure that you send packets of them to the attorney general's office and to the U.S. attorney's office.
[01:55:26.080 --> 01:55:32.080]  And send that to the DA as well, that you, when you file them with anybody, you put a CC on it,
[01:55:32.080 --> 01:55:39.080]  with a cover letter with a CC, attorney general's office, United States attorney's office.
[01:55:39.080 --> 01:55:46.080]  And where and which attorney you send it to, what district, whatever.
[01:55:46.080 --> 01:55:48.080]  Okay. Yeah.
[01:55:48.080 --> 01:55:54.080]  So I guess what I'm asking, I mean, what can I do at this late date?
[01:55:54.080 --> 01:55:56.080]  I mean, honestly, the only...
[01:55:56.080 --> 01:56:04.080]  Well, it's not a late date if you get them disqualified for violation of your rights and their duty under the judicial canons.
[01:56:04.080 --> 01:56:08.080]  It's not because this is a municipal court, right?
[01:56:08.080 --> 01:56:10.080]  Chapter 29A, Government Code.
[01:56:10.080 --> 01:56:15.080]  The moment that a motion to disqualify or recuse is filed in a municipal court,
[01:56:15.080 --> 01:56:29.080]  the municipal court must cease and desist all activity until a ruling at a hearing by the head administrative judge has been had.
[01:56:29.080 --> 01:56:31.080]  Okay. Yeah.
[01:56:31.080 --> 01:56:41.080]  And I was going to ask you, did you ever, because I know in the seminar material you had, you know, touched on the administrative code,
[01:56:41.080 --> 01:56:47.080]  you know, the State Board of Administrative Hearings, you know, the motion for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,
[01:56:47.080 --> 01:56:53.080]  even if it's something in the seminar that you had that was kind of that you were working on back then.
[01:56:53.080 --> 01:56:56.080]  But have you ever, did you ever develop that or?
[01:56:56.080 --> 01:56:58.080]  On which part again?
[01:56:58.080 --> 01:57:07.080]  Well, the administrative code, the State Board of Administrative Hearings, you know, was licensed.
[01:57:07.080 --> 01:57:10.080]  The department is an agency.
[01:57:10.080 --> 01:57:18.080]  And, of course, in the administrative code that all contested cases, you know, should be heard before the State Board of Hearings.
[01:57:18.080 --> 01:57:21.080]  Well, no, I haven't written anything up on that yet.
[01:57:21.080 --> 01:57:24.080]  Yeah. Well, that was a good idea.
[01:57:24.080 --> 01:57:33.080]  I actually discussed that in the book, however, that comes with the seminar material that's already out there.
[01:57:33.080 --> 01:57:41.080]  Yeah, the thing about what you can do in this case with that head administrative judge, they're going to have to hear it.
[01:57:41.080 --> 01:57:44.080]  They don't have a choice at the municipal court.
[01:57:44.080 --> 01:57:54.080]  But get, do the criminal complaints as well as the judicial conduct complaints. Do them both.
[01:57:54.080 --> 01:57:55.080]  Okay.
[01:57:55.080 --> 01:58:01.080]  Okay. And if you can, the recordings that you made, provide a copy of the recording
[01:58:01.080 --> 01:58:07.080]  and a transcript of it along with those documents to each of the entities you're mailing them to.
[01:58:07.080 --> 01:58:08.080]  Okay.
[01:58:08.080 --> 01:58:12.080]  All right. And I sent you an email.
[01:58:12.080 --> 01:58:16.080]  Yeah, I saw your email about what you're talking about here tonight on the show.
[01:58:16.080 --> 01:58:18.080]  I haven't got a chance to read it yet.
[01:58:18.080 --> 01:58:19.080]  All right.
[01:58:19.080 --> 01:58:22.080]  Okay. Well, I'll be in contact with you.
[01:58:22.080 --> 01:58:25.080]  I'll try to get to see you tomorrow.
[01:58:25.080 --> 01:58:26.080]  All right, Robert, that's fine.
[01:58:26.080 --> 01:58:27.080]  I'm sorry, man.
[01:58:27.080 --> 01:58:28.080]  I got to cut you off.
[01:58:28.080 --> 01:58:29.080]  All right, folks.
[01:58:29.080 --> 01:58:31.080]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show.
[01:58:31.080 --> 01:58:34.080]  Thank you all for listening and for calling in.
[01:58:34.080 --> 01:58:38.080]  Please keep an eye out for the crowdfunding requests that I'm going to make
[01:58:38.080 --> 01:58:43.080]  so we can get information out there to the masses via web-screened classes.
[01:58:43.080 --> 01:58:50.080]  Y'all hang in there. Have a blessed week. Good night. God bless.
[01:58:50.080 --> 01:58:58.080]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.080 --> 01:59:03.080]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says,
[01:59:03.080 --> 01:59:08.080]  verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.080 --> 01:59:11.080]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.080 --> 01:59:20.080]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.080 --> 01:59:26.080]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.080 --> 01:59:30.080]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.080 --> 01:59:33.080]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.080 --> 01:59:36.080]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:36.080 --> 01:59:41.080]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.080 --> 01:59:50.080]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.080 --> 02:00:00.080]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com