[00:00.000 --> 00:07.480]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates, online
[00:07.480 --> 00:08.480]  at thelibertybeat.com.
[00:08.480 --> 00:12.920]  I'm Brian Hagan, with your Liberty Beat for Monday, February 23rd, 2015.
[00:12.920 --> 00:20.480]  Gold is trading at $1,203, silver at $16.24, and bitcoin is trading around $236.93.
[00:20.480 --> 00:27.280]  Today's bitcoin price, brought to you by ExpressCoin, the fastest, most reliable way to buy bitcoin.
[00:27.280 --> 00:29.840]  Buy bitcoin today at ExpressCoin.com.
[00:29.840 --> 00:30.840]  Your job.
[00:30.840 --> 00:31.840]  Your home.
[00:31.840 --> 00:32.840]  Your car.
[00:32.840 --> 00:33.840]  Your money.
[00:33.840 --> 00:37.280]  All of these things provide you with a sense of security, but what about your family security?
[00:37.280 --> 00:40.560]  What have you done to prepare if all of these things were suddenly gone?
[00:40.560 --> 00:45.000]  eFoods Direct has the food security you need for every emergency.
[00:45.000 --> 00:47.320]  eFoods Direct is food security.
[00:47.320 --> 00:54.240]  Go to eFoodsDirect.com slash Liberty Beat or call 800-620-5520 and mention Liberty Beat
[00:54.240 --> 00:57.400]  for 50% off their food preparation planning tax.
[00:57.400 --> 01:01.720]  In the news, despite warnings from Homeland Security Secretary Jay Johnson, there's no
[01:01.720 --> 01:05.440]  credible threat to U.S. shopping malls, according to the agency.
[01:05.440 --> 01:10.200]  Johnson appeared on CNN's State of the Union, discussing an alleged threat from the Al-Shabaab
[01:10.200 --> 01:14.080]  terrorist organization.
[01:14.080 --> 01:18.360]  Around 100 activists in Emoryville, California shut down a home depot, following the shooting
[01:18.360 --> 01:21.240]  death of a woman by two local police officers.
[01:21.240 --> 01:25.200]  On February 3rd, Yvette Henderson was shot after allegedly shoplifting and attempting
[01:25.200 --> 01:26.960]  to steal a vehicle.
[01:26.960 --> 01:31.080]  Activists with Black Lives Matter protested outside the store, causing the owners to close
[01:31.080 --> 01:34.560]  for several hours.
[01:34.560 --> 01:39.280]  In celebration of the launch of the new and improved SovereignLiving.com, every day this
[01:39.280 --> 01:44.640]  week, the Liberty Beat will bring you a simple survival tip that just might save your life.
[01:44.640 --> 01:46.560]  Here's John Bush with today's tip.
[01:46.560 --> 01:48.400]  It's important to be prepared.
[01:48.400 --> 01:51.040]  Save plastic bottles and fill them with water.
[01:51.040 --> 01:55.080]  After your family finishes a juice bottle or milk jug, clean out the bottle, fill it
[01:55.080 --> 01:59.520]  with water, and place it in a cool, dark area like a closet or storage room.
[01:59.520 --> 02:02.880]  Cycle through the water as plastic tends to break down over time.
[02:02.880 --> 02:06.520]  It helps to have a high-quality water filter if you plan to be drinking or cooking with
[02:06.520 --> 02:08.800]  the water and has been sitting for a few months.
[02:08.800 --> 02:13.280]  My family has used this method of water storage and it has come in handy on several occasions,
[02:13.280 --> 02:17.440]  as the municipal water supply we were once connected to failed several times.
[02:17.440 --> 02:21.280]  Without the stored water, we wouldn't have been able to flush our toilet and we would
[02:21.280 --> 02:23.560]  not have had any water for food preparation.
[02:23.560 --> 02:28.040]  The Liberty Beat is sponsored by Coinarch, offering innovative online trading solutions
[02:28.040 --> 02:29.040]  for Bitcoin.
[02:29.040 --> 02:34.160]  Visit Coinarch.com and sign up using coupon code MAX and get free brokerage for the first
[02:34.160 --> 02:35.320]  seven days.
[02:35.320 --> 02:37.800]  It only takes $10 to start an account.
[02:37.800 --> 02:40.000]  That's Coinarch.com.
[02:40.000 --> 02:43.480]  Support also comes from Cabo Bob's, southwestern-style burritos.
[02:43.480 --> 02:48.920]  Now with two locations in Austin, 500 East Mid-Wide Boulevard and 2828 Rio Grande Boulevard.
[02:48.920 --> 02:51.320]  Find them online, Cabobobs.com.
[02:51.320 --> 02:55.520]  This is the Liberty Beat for Monday, February 23, 2015.
[02:55.520 --> 03:21.800]  Check out the website at theLibertyBeat.com.
[03:56.520 --> 04:00.520] ... for all the people to see.
[04:00.520 --> 04:04.520]  That justice is one thing you should always find.
[04:04.520 --> 04:08.520]  You gotta saddle up before you've got to draw a hard line.
[04:08.520 --> 04:12.520]  When the gun folks settle to sing a victory tune,
[04:12.520 --> 04:16.520]  that will haul me back at the local single.
[04:16.520 --> 04:21.520]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing,
[04:21.520 --> 04:32.520]  whiskey for my men, beer for my horses.
[04:32.520 --> 04:34.520]  All right, folks, good evening.
[04:34.520 --> 04:36.520]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show.
[04:36.520 --> 04:40.520]  It is February 23, 2015.
[04:40.520 --> 04:42.520]  All right.
[04:42.520 --> 04:46.520]  Before we start taking calls tonight, I want to try to get a little information out there
[04:46.520 --> 04:50.520]  about some other things going on in the transportation code
[04:50.520 --> 04:54.520]  and have been for a while, but something that most people are very sensitive about
[04:54.520 --> 04:59.520]  and some argue for it and others argue against it and blah, blah, blah.
[04:59.520 --> 05:03.520]  But the ones that are arguing for it don't seem to understand the basic concept
[05:03.520 --> 05:06.520]  of what they're actually getting by what they're arguing for.
[05:06.520 --> 05:08.520]  So let me go into that.
[05:08.520 --> 05:13.520]  What I'm talking about is compulsory insurance on your car.
[05:13.520 --> 05:18.520]  Now, here is the problem with the compulsory insurance.
[05:18.520 --> 05:23.520]  Compulsory insurance was instituted when the insurance companies got together
[05:23.520 --> 05:28.520]  and lobbied the Texas legislature to require everyone in Texas
[05:28.520 --> 05:32.520]  to carry insurance on their motor vehicle.
[05:32.520 --> 05:35.520]  Now, remember, a motor vehicle is not your private car,
[05:35.520 --> 05:39.520]  if you understand the transportation code and its purpose.
[05:39.520 --> 05:44.520]  The people of Texas were never intended to be forced to enter into a contract
[05:44.520 --> 05:48.520]  on a commercial basis with anybody.
[05:48.520 --> 05:53.520]  Yet the courts are saying that the legislature has the power to do this
[05:53.520 --> 05:55.520]  based upon the way the statute is written
[05:55.520 --> 06:00.520]  and the disjunctive legalese they use to make it appear as if it includes everyone
[06:00.520 --> 06:04.520]  rather than just those engaging in transportation.
[06:04.520 --> 06:08.520]  But here's their issue or the issue.
[06:08.520 --> 06:14.520]  The insurance companies lobbied to get guaranteed business,
[06:14.520 --> 06:18.520]  and the moment they got a lock on that business,
[06:18.520 --> 06:21.520]  the cost of insurance began to rise.
[06:21.520 --> 06:24.520]  Now, the state said it was regulating it.
[06:24.520 --> 06:25.520]  That's baloney.
[06:25.520 --> 06:28.520]  If you go back and compare all the prices over the years
[06:28.520 --> 06:34.520]  since this was implemented, the prices have continuously gone up.
[06:34.520 --> 06:40.520]  I remember when my insurance for two cars was $70-something for both.
[06:40.520 --> 06:46.520]  You can't get insurance on one car from an honest agent
[06:46.520 --> 06:53.520]  that will actually cover the car for twice that amount right now.
[06:53.520 --> 06:57.520]  And most of the insurance agents you have are just outright crooks.
[06:57.520 --> 06:59.520]  They'll take your money, but they'll never pay out.
[06:59.520 --> 07:02.520]  And most of the big insurance companies are the same way.
[07:02.520 --> 07:06.520]  Here's how this whole scheme is designed to work.
[07:06.520 --> 07:09.520]  Now, let's say, for instance, you have been in the system long enough
[07:09.520 --> 07:12.520]  that you're paying the compelled insurance.
[07:12.520 --> 07:15.520]  You are required to pay X amount of dollars every month
[07:15.520 --> 07:20.520]  to the insurance company without fail or they are allowed to suspend your coverage,
[07:20.520 --> 07:23.520]  at which point the state then comes after you telling you that,
[07:23.520 --> 07:29.520]  hey, your coverage failed, you now owe us money on top of getting your insurance back.
[07:29.520 --> 07:34.520]  And if you continue to go without insurance, then we're going to require you to do it under an SR-22,
[07:34.520 --> 07:41.520]  which is going to cost you even more money, and blah, blah, blah, and so on and so forth.
[07:41.520 --> 07:47.520]  Now, all of this guarantees profits to the insurance companies.
[07:47.520 --> 07:57.520]  And you are required, you are forced at the barrel of a gun to pay the insurance company.
[07:57.520 --> 08:05.520]  But there is no flip side to that coin that compels the insurance company
[08:05.520 --> 08:12.520]  to pay out on a claim to anyone injured by someone carrying their insurance.
[08:12.520 --> 08:14.520]  I know, I went through this.
[08:14.520 --> 08:16.520]  Personally, I went through this.
[08:16.520 --> 08:19.520]  And I've watched others go through it as well.
[08:19.520 --> 08:26.520]  Texas has set it up so that the insurance company cannot be sued directly.
[08:26.520 --> 08:33.520]  You can only sue the person who purchased the policy from the insurance company.
[08:33.520 --> 08:36.520]  And you would go, oh, well, okay, so what's wrong with that?
[08:36.520 --> 08:38.520]  Well, here's what's wrong with that.
[08:38.520 --> 08:46.520]  You're having to sue a person that is not responsible for the decisions being made in relation to that policy.
[08:46.520 --> 08:52.520]  The policyholder does not get to dictate whether or not to just pay the claim and go away
[08:52.520 --> 08:56.520]  or whether to pay the claim at all, the insurance company does.
[08:56.520 --> 09:05.520]  And the insurance company controls how much and what that will be despite what the terms of the contract are.
[09:05.520 --> 09:09.520]  Now, again, everybody's going, well, so what's the big deal?
[09:09.520 --> 09:12.520]  Well, here's the big deal.
[09:12.520 --> 09:17.520]  In Texas, the insurance company is not compelled to pay the claim
[09:17.520 --> 09:24.520]  and then allowed to sue to recover if it turns out that the claim involves any type of fraud
[09:24.520 --> 09:31.520]  because the insurance company knows that it would spend far more to recover the money
[09:31.520 --> 09:37.520]  than it actually spent in paying the money if it was required to pay out.
[09:37.520 --> 09:43.520]  But at the same token, its basis for not paying out, oh, it could be fraudulent.
[09:43.520 --> 09:48.520]  The odds of it actually being fraudulent to any monetary degree to the insurance company
[09:48.520 --> 09:54.520]  is almost nil when it's all said and done.
[09:54.520 --> 10:00.520]  Basically, what the insurance company is allowed to say is we get to presume that everybody making a claim
[10:00.520 --> 10:09.520]  is a lying, fraud-committing thief, and we have the right not to pay the claim until a jury says we have to.
[10:09.520 --> 10:15.520]  But no jury gets to decide whether or not you have to pay the insurance company.
[10:15.520 --> 10:21.520]  No jury gets to decide whether or not all those premiums that the policyholder paid in
[10:21.520 --> 10:26.520]  gives the policyholder the right to make the insurance company pay.
[10:26.520 --> 10:30.520]  The insurance company is the one controlling the access to the court
[10:30.520 --> 10:35.520]  by providing a defense attorney for the person that holds the policy if they get sued,
[10:35.520 --> 10:40.520]  but you can't sue the insurance company directly.
[10:40.520 --> 10:47.520]  Now, the reasons for this is because the courts all decided, based upon the way the legislature wrote it up,
[10:47.520 --> 10:52.520]  that it would be unfair to get to sue the insurance company directly
[10:52.520 --> 10:55.520]  because if people saw that it was an insurance company getting sued,
[10:55.520 --> 10:59.520]  well, they might decide to go ahead and award more money.
[10:59.520 --> 11:03.520]  Anybody seeing a pattern of why this works the way it does here?
[11:03.520 --> 11:08.520]  If the jury knew it was an insurance company that was having to pay rather than the individual,
[11:08.520 --> 11:13.520]  the payout might be ruled to be larger if they decide in favor of the person,
[11:13.520 --> 11:17.520]  the plaintiff having to sue to get their payment.
[11:17.520 --> 11:23.520]  Now, I can tell you firsthand the main reason for this on the insurance company side is this.
[11:23.520 --> 11:33.520]  They gamble that the jury is willing to give out less money in a lawsuit to a plaintiff
[11:33.520 --> 11:40.520]  than they would if the company had to pay the claim outright to begin with.
[11:40.520 --> 11:44.520]  It doesn't matter that the claim is legitimate and the money is duly owed.
[11:44.520 --> 11:51.520]  The insurance company doesn't want to pay it, even though that is the terms of their contract
[11:51.520 --> 11:54.520]  with the policyholder.
[11:54.520 --> 12:02.520]  But their contract is not with the person that got injured by the policyholder.
[12:02.520 --> 12:03.520]  You see the problem here?
[12:03.520 --> 12:09.520]  So the person that's having to do the suing that suffered from the injury caused by their policyholder
[12:09.520 --> 12:15.520]  can't go directly after the source of the money that's controlling everything.
[12:15.520 --> 12:21.520]  And the jury is being told that you're suing this little old lady whose husband died three months ago
[12:21.520 --> 12:27.520]  from cancer, so you're just a cruel, heartless beast that wants to get money from somebody
[12:27.520 --> 12:31.520]  you don't rightfully have coming to you.
[12:31.520 --> 12:36.520]  Rather than from an insurance company that decided they were not going to pay you,
[12:36.520 --> 12:43.520]  no matter how justified it was, because they believed that the jury would give you less money
[12:43.520 --> 12:48.520]  if they were under the impression you were going after all of the little old lady's savings
[12:48.520 --> 12:58.520]  than if you were going after the profits of a big corporate insurance scam.
[12:58.520 --> 13:06.520]  Ladies and gentlemen, compulsory insurance has absolutely nothing to do with the ability
[13:06.520 --> 13:11.520]  to compensate people who are injured for their injuries.
[13:11.520 --> 13:16.520]  It's got nothing to do to compensate for property damage, nothing.
[13:16.520 --> 13:24.520]  When it comes down to somebody actually suffering a medical injury that could be life-threatening
[13:24.520 --> 13:31.520]  or prolonged or anything like that, the insurance companies will almost always refuse to pay
[13:31.520 --> 13:37.520]  on the grounds that the jury will award far less money than what the insurance company
[13:37.520 --> 13:42.520]  would have to pay if they honored the terms of the policy itself.
[13:42.520 --> 13:47.520]  And Texas law is set up to protect their profit.
[13:47.520 --> 13:49.520]  Now, I've had a lot of people attack me saying,
[13:49.520 --> 13:52.520]  oh, you just don't want anybody to have to be able to pay if they hurt somebody.
[13:52.520 --> 13:54.520]  You don't want anybody to do that.
[13:54.520 --> 13:58.520]  People, that's a straw man argument.
[13:58.520 --> 14:02.520]  I never said that people shouldn't have insurance.
[14:02.520 --> 14:07.520]  If they can afford it, they darn well should have it.
[14:07.520 --> 14:12.520]  But I have said and I will continue to say nobody has the right to stick a gun to my
[14:12.520 --> 14:19.520]  temple and tell me I've got to buy it from anybody in any amount.
[14:19.520 --> 14:28.520]  No one has the right to force me to support a business that is a huge scam,
[14:28.520 --> 14:31.520]  like insurance has become.
[14:31.520 --> 14:33.520]  And it's not just auto insurance.
[14:33.520 --> 14:34.520]  It's health insurance.
[14:34.520 --> 14:37.520]  It's every kind of insurance.
[14:37.520 --> 14:41.520]  When you get lucky enough to roll the dice and they actually pay out because it's not
[14:41.520 --> 14:43.520]  such a big deal, great.
[14:43.520 --> 14:48.520]  But when you have to take them to court, yeah, let's see just how well off you are then
[14:48.520 --> 14:53.520]  when they have all the money and you don't.
[14:53.520 --> 15:01.520]  Getting a medical claim in Texas when it comes to an automobile accident is extremely difficult,
[15:01.520 --> 15:05.520]  especially in an amount that's actually justifiable.
[15:05.520 --> 15:13.520]  And most, more often than not, the person that was the victim and has to be the plaintiff
[15:13.520 --> 15:19.520]  in the lawsuit is the one that's going to get screwed, not the insurance company and
[15:19.520 --> 15:24.520]  not the policyholder that caused the injury.
[15:24.520 --> 15:29.520]  I mean, what good does it do to sue a person who has no insurance and no money?
[15:29.520 --> 15:31.520]  You don't get paid.
[15:31.520 --> 15:37.520]  But by the same token, what good does it do to sue a person who has insurance if the insurance
[15:37.520 --> 15:40.520]  company cannot be made to pay?
[15:40.520 --> 15:49.520]  Why isn't the law evenly handed when it comes to administering the insurance policies?
[15:49.520 --> 15:55.520]  The insurance company should be forced to pay the settlement, period.
[15:55.520 --> 16:01.520]  And they can seek redress if they have evidence that the person receiving the money
[16:01.520 --> 16:03.520]  committed fraud to get it.
[16:03.520 --> 16:07.520]  That would be fair.
[16:07.520 --> 16:11.520]  You don't get to claim I'm committing fraud until you've got some evidence of it.
[16:11.520 --> 16:16.520]  And you don't get to shortchange what you rightfully owe me in the possibility I'm
[16:16.520 --> 16:19.520]  committing fraud unless you've got some evidence of it.
[16:19.520 --> 16:23.520]  You don't get to just presume you don't have to pay me because every claim is fraudulent
[16:23.520 --> 16:25.520]  if you don't like it.
[16:25.520 --> 16:27.520]  But that's exactly what happens.
[16:27.520 --> 16:31.520]  If you and I had to honor the terms of an agreement that way, we would get thrown in
[16:31.520 --> 16:33.520]  jail if it was possible to do that.
[16:33.520 --> 16:38.520]  But I guarantee we wouldn't win in court.
[16:38.520 --> 16:44.520]  Yet here in Texas and many other places, that's exactly how this insurance scam is
[16:44.520 --> 16:46.520]  set up to operate.
[16:46.520 --> 16:51.520]  And you can't get many people to begin to even contemplate that.
[16:51.520 --> 16:55.520]  All right, folks, call at number 512-646-1984.
[16:55.520 --> 16:56.520]  Y'all give us a call.
[16:56.520 --> 17:00.520]  We will be right back.
[17:00.520 --> 17:05.520]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[17:05.520 --> 17:06.520]  of nutrition.
[17:06.520 --> 17:09.520]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[17:09.520 --> 17:11.520]  And it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.520 --> 17:17.520]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.520 --> 17:22.520]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[17:22.520 --> 17:25.520]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.520 --> 17:29.520]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products.
[17:29.520 --> 17:31.520]  Most of which we reject.
[17:31.520 --> 17:36.520]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along
[17:36.520 --> 17:39.520]  with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.520 --> 17:45.520]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[17:45.520 --> 17:47.520]  quality radio.
[17:47.520 --> 17:51.520]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.520 --> 17:56.520]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[17:56.520 --> 17:58.520]  and increase your income.
[17:58.520 --> 18:00.520]  Order now.
[18:29.520 --> 18:33.520]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.520 --> 18:38.520]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.520 --> 18:40.520]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.520 --> 18:45.520]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue
[18:45.520 --> 18:49.520]  Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at Yahoo.com.
[18:49.520 --> 18:57.520]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at Yahoo.com to
[18:57.520 --> 19:00.520]  learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.520 --> 19:08.520]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:08.520 --> 19:13.520]  Look what we got.
[19:13.520 --> 19:16.520]  We are the Christians.
[19:16.520 --> 19:19.520]  You know what it is.
[19:19.520 --> 19:22.520]  Adventure.
[19:22.520 --> 19:26.520]  We are the Christians.
[19:26.520 --> 19:29.520]  You know what it is.
[19:29.520 --> 19:32.520]  Adventure.
[19:32.520 --> 19:35.520]  You know what it is.
[19:35.520 --> 19:38.520]  Adventure.
[19:38.520 --> 19:40.520]  You know what it is.
[19:40.520 --> 19:43.520]  Adventure.
[19:43.520 --> 19:46.520]  You know what it is.
[19:46.520 --> 19:49.520]  Adventure.
[19:49.520 --> 19:52.520]  All right, folks, we are back.
[19:52.520 --> 19:58.520]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call-in number, 512-646-1984.
[19:58.520 --> 20:00.520]  I've got a couple of callers up on the board.
[20:00.520 --> 20:03.520]  We're going to go to Andrew in Pennsylvania.
[20:03.520 --> 20:05.520]  Andrew, what can we do for you?
[20:05.520 --> 20:07.520]  A couple of questions about the law.
[20:07.520 --> 20:11.520]  First of all, I probably should know this, but I don't.
[20:11.520 --> 20:15.520]  Considering all crimes are commercial.
[20:15.520 --> 20:17.520]  Objection.
[20:17.520 --> 20:22.520]  What is the foundational facts for that statement?
[20:22.520 --> 20:25.520]  They always go to some commercial nexus.
[20:25.520 --> 20:26.520]  That's not true.
[20:26.520 --> 20:29.520]  Murder does not necessarily go to a commercial nexus.
[20:29.520 --> 20:32.520]  Fraud might, but murder doesn't.
[20:32.520 --> 20:34.520]  It's malum in se corpus delecti.
[20:34.520 --> 20:39.520]  But if it's not, then they go to some commercial nexus.
[20:39.520 --> 20:43.520]  What can you murder that isn't malum in se with a corpus delecti,
[20:43.520 --> 20:49.520]  provided that you can find the body?
[20:49.520 --> 20:55.520]  How do you murder anything else?
[20:55.520 --> 20:58.520]  You lost me.
[20:58.520 --> 21:00.520]  Well, what can be murdered?
[21:00.520 --> 21:04.520]  Can a corporation be murdered?
[21:04.520 --> 21:07.520]  Oh, I don't know the legal definition of murder.
[21:07.520 --> 21:17.520]  Murder is the untimely death of a living being, human being.
[21:17.520 --> 21:19.520]  Okay.
[21:19.520 --> 21:23.520]  Untimely, unnatural, whichever way you want to phrase it,
[21:23.520 --> 21:29.520]  but still death of a human being by other than natural causes and means.
[21:29.520 --> 21:35.520]  With the intention that that be the result.
[21:35.520 --> 21:36.520]  Yeah, right.
[21:36.520 --> 21:39.520]  Fair enough definition.
[21:39.520 --> 21:41.520]  So.
[21:41.520 --> 21:42.520]  Okay.
[21:42.520 --> 21:46.520]  So again, how would that be commercial?
[21:46.520 --> 21:48.520]  It's not.
[21:48.520 --> 21:49.520]  Right.
[21:49.520 --> 21:50.520]  There is a harm.
[21:50.520 --> 21:54.520]  Therefore, all crimes are not commercial.
[21:54.520 --> 21:58.520]  All codified crimes may be commercial.
[21:58.520 --> 22:04.520]  All statutory crimes may be commercial.
[22:04.520 --> 22:09.520]  But not all crimes are commercial.
[22:09.520 --> 22:10.520]  Right.
[22:10.520 --> 22:11.520]  Sorry, I didn't want to run.
[22:11.520 --> 22:15.520]  I was referring to specific cases where on the list of charges,
[22:15.520 --> 22:18.520]  they have some commercial nexus.
[22:18.520 --> 22:21.520]  So in general, whenever you're fighting any case,
[22:21.520 --> 22:27.520]  all you basically have to do is to find out where the commercial nexus is and object in court.
[22:27.520 --> 22:29.520]  Am I right?
[22:29.520 --> 22:35.520]  If you can make the foundational argument that it is commercial, sure.
[22:35.520 --> 22:37.520]  Okay.
[22:37.520 --> 22:44.520]  Well, if this is true, then how come so many people that are not committing commercial crimes
[22:44.520 --> 22:46.520]  are getting found guilty in the end?
[22:46.520 --> 22:48.520]  Is it because the lawyers are stupid?
[22:48.520 --> 22:50.520]  I mean, I remember when you were on my...
[22:50.520 --> 22:51.520]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[22:51.520 --> 22:52.520]  Is that actually a question?
[22:52.520 --> 22:56.520]  Is the lawyer stupid?
[22:56.520 --> 22:57.520]  Well, he is stupid.
[22:57.520 --> 22:59.520]  I know that a lot of the lawyers are stupid.
[22:59.520 --> 23:05.520]  But what I'm asking is how are they not aware that just find the commercial nexus
[23:05.520 --> 23:07.520]  and then object to it?
[23:07.520 --> 23:09.520]  Because if you remember, Eddie...
[23:09.520 --> 23:13.520]  Because lawyers don't know law.
[23:13.520 --> 23:15.520]  It's that simple.
[23:15.520 --> 23:20.520]  The definition of a lawyer is someone that is knowledgeable in the law.
[23:20.520 --> 23:22.520]  You're not dealing with lawyers anymore.
[23:22.520 --> 23:24.520]  You're dealing with attorneys.
[23:24.520 --> 23:30.520]  Someone paid to imitate the fact that they're knowledgeable in the law.
[23:30.520 --> 23:39.520]  I have yet to meet any of these idiots that work in the jurisprudence arena at all
[23:39.520 --> 23:48.520]  that have demonstrated an actual working knowledge of law the way it was intended to work in America.
[23:48.520 --> 23:50.520]  And I'll give you a perfect example.
[23:50.520 --> 23:55.520]  Find any lawyer or judge that you're not having to appear in front of
[23:55.520 --> 24:01.520]  so that there's not an issue where they can't just talk to you and answer this question.
[24:01.520 --> 24:03.520]  Okay?
[24:03.520 --> 24:10.520]  And it shouldn't be all that difficult for them to answer these particular types of questions.
[24:10.520 --> 24:20.520]  But when you ask them, when you read a law, is your first objective in reading it is determining
[24:20.520 --> 24:25.520]  whether or not it conflicts with an individual right?
[24:25.520 --> 24:28.520]  And they will tell you no, it's not.
[24:28.520 --> 24:30.520]  Why?
[24:30.520 --> 24:42.520]  Because they presume falsely and incorrectly that the legislature did everything right in the first place.
[24:42.520 --> 24:48.520]  And that the executive enforced it right in the first place.
[24:48.520 --> 24:54.520]  See, we're supposed to be set up as an adversarial system of government.
[24:54.520 --> 24:59.520]  Every branch is supposed to be a protection, a stop or a firebreak
[24:59.520 --> 25:04.520]  or however you want to qualify them against every other part of the system
[25:04.520 --> 25:08.520]  depriving any of the people of their individual rights.
[25:08.520 --> 25:10.520]  It's supposed to be checks and balances.
[25:10.520 --> 25:15.520]  Each part of the system checks the others against those abuses.
[25:15.520 --> 25:17.520]  But they don't do that anymore.
[25:17.520 --> 25:28.520]  They have become one big collaborative machine whose entire focus is increasing their own power while destroying ours.
[25:28.520 --> 25:36.520]  So that is the answer to your first part of your premise here, is they're not stupid.
[25:36.520 --> 25:42.520]  They've completely altered the way the system of justice was set up to originally work.
[25:42.520 --> 25:48.520]  Because the adversarial system is now the people against their government
[25:48.520 --> 25:56.520]  rather than the different departments of government being against each other to protect the rights of the people.
[25:56.520 --> 26:00.520]  Make sense?
[26:00.520 --> 26:01.520]  Right, right.
[26:01.520 --> 26:02.520]  Yes.
[26:02.520 --> 26:10.520]  So I was saying when I had you on my show, a caller called in, talked about drug-related crimes.
[26:10.520 --> 26:16.520]  And you explained how they do go to some commercial nexus, either if they catch you in possession or if they catch you growing drugs.
[26:16.520 --> 26:24.520]  Well, no, they go to that because you will find out that at some point the whole thing they're trying to charge you with is transportation and distribution.
[26:24.520 --> 26:27.520]  That's the commercial nexus.
[26:27.520 --> 26:36.520]  In every single federal drug crime, whether it's possession, cultivation, you name it,
[26:36.520 --> 26:44.520]  it is always added to for the purpose of distribution or transportation between across state lines.
[26:44.520 --> 26:47.520]  Always.
[26:47.520 --> 26:55.520]  Okay, so if you're fighting a case like that at a trial, where would you object at what point?
[26:55.520 --> 27:04.520]  You would object to them making the presumption that it was for transportation across state lines or distribution across state lines.
[27:04.520 --> 27:11.520]  Now, that wouldn't do anything as far as the state not being able to prosecute you for violation of its laws,
[27:11.520 --> 27:16.520]  but it would certainly nullify any nexus the Fed would have to make the claim.
[27:16.520 --> 27:23.520]  If they're going to assert it's for transportation, they have to prove who was buying it.
[27:23.520 --> 27:26.520]  And if they're buying it, where were they located?
[27:26.520 --> 27:30.520]  And they have to prove that they were across a state line.
[27:30.520 --> 27:42.520]  That's one of the necessary elements they created by stating it in the complaint against you for the purpose of distribution across state lines or transportation across state lines or both.
[27:42.520 --> 27:48.520]  But until it crosses that state line, the Fed has no jurisdiction over it and they know it.
[27:48.520 --> 27:57.520]  But no one, including the lawyers, bothers to negate that little elementary requirement.
[27:57.520 --> 28:04.520]  Okay, but the state laws, would they basically do the same thing but just to the territorial boundaries of the state if they were dealing with a drug crime?
[28:04.520 --> 28:05.520]  Correct.
[28:05.520 --> 28:09.520]  Yeah, okay, okay. That doesn't make sense.
[28:09.520 --> 28:14.520]  Sorry, but in regards to selling drugs, that raises the question.
[28:14.520 --> 28:19.520]  Well, if you're selling drugs, you're in commerce, but you can't get a license for it because if you try to get a license for that
[28:19.520 --> 28:22.520]  and they find out that's what you're getting a license for, you're going to get arrested.
[28:22.520 --> 28:29.520]  And that raises the whole question of when does the government have the authority to make it illegal to sell something like that?
[28:29.520 --> 28:31.520]  I mean, could you maybe answer that question?
[28:31.520 --> 28:42.520]  Well, technically there is no legal or constitutional authority for the federal government to do anything in relation to drugs or with guns.
[28:42.520 --> 28:44.520]  None.
[28:44.520 --> 28:49.520]  Show me any place in the Constitution where they're allowed to regulate any of that.
[28:49.520 --> 29:00.520]  Every premise they use for that basis and assertion of power is based upon a constitutionally incorrect interpretation of the Commerce Clause.
[29:00.520 --> 29:03.520]  And the courts have empowered them to get away with it.
[29:03.520 --> 29:10.520]  Hence, that's the basis of the claim all claims are commercial because the only way the Fed could get their hands on anything
[29:10.520 --> 29:22.520]  within the borders of any of the states is through the Commerce Clause, which by definition is commercial.
[29:22.520 --> 29:35.520]  So all federal crimes are commercial with the exception of what? Treason and counterfeiting would be commercial but in a different way.
[29:35.520 --> 29:41.520]  Immigration and what else?
[29:41.520 --> 29:43.520]  I think that's about it.
[29:43.520 --> 29:46.520]  But in any case, hang on Andrew, we'll pick this up on the other side, okay?
[29:46.520 --> 29:47.520]  Okay.
[29:47.520 --> 29:52.520]  All right folks, call at number 512-646-1984.
[29:52.520 --> 30:00.520]  Give us a call, give us a holler, we will be right back.
[30:00.520 --> 30:03.520]  Here's one more reason not to trust governments and databases.
[30:03.520 --> 30:11.520]  Citizens of Missouri discovered outside companies obtained their driver's license information, including names, addresses, and birth dates.
[30:11.520 --> 30:14.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with more.
[30:14.520 --> 30:21.520]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches, and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[30:21.520 --> 30:22.520]  That's creepy.
[30:22.520 --> 30:24.520]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:24.520 --> 30:27.520]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:27.520 --> 30:34.520]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third party certified.
[30:34.520 --> 30:38.520]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[30:38.520 --> 30:41.520]  Great search results and total privacy.
[30:41.520 --> 30:44.520]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:44.520 --> 30:52.520]  Driver's license databases are supposed to be private, but information resellers got a hold of Missouri's records and put them up for sale.
[30:52.520 --> 30:59.520]  Angry Citizens filed a class action lawsuit against Missouri Department of Motor Vehicle employees and the information resellers.
[30:59.520 --> 31:06.520]  A court settlement requires Shadowsoft and a source for public data to return the driver's license information and stop selling it.
[31:06.520 --> 31:16.520]  However, they still have their dirty paws on DMV records from other states, including Texas, Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, Mississippi, Idaho, Minnesota, and Iowa.
[31:16.520 --> 31:22.520]  If you're in one of those states, contact your state lawmakers and ask them to put a stop to the sale of your personal information.
[31:22.520 --> 31:30.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.520 --> 31:37.520]  What are you thinking? Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month.
[31:37.520 --> 31:48.520]  FUSA.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidney, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever.
[31:48.520 --> 31:52.520]  It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products.
[31:52.520 --> 31:57.520]  That saves you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367.
[31:57.520 --> 32:01.520]  Or, at FUSA.org.
[32:01.520 --> 32:05.520]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:05.520 --> 32:07.520]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:07.520 --> 32:12.520]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.520 --> 32:19.520]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.520 --> 32:25.520]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.520 --> 32:35.520]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.520 --> 32:40.520]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.520 --> 32:50.520]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.520 --> 32:59.520]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.520 --> 33:11.520]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:11.520 --> 33:27.520]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm gonna solve them, to the government them, prosecute them. Okay.
[33:27.520 --> 33:56.520]  All right, folks, we are back and we're talking with Andrew in Pennsylvania.
[33:56.520 --> 33:58.520]  All right, Andrew, go ahead.
[33:58.520 --> 34:01.520]  Yeah, a couple things about your deadly sins list.
[34:01.520 --> 34:10.520]  One, oh, actually two deadly sins that aren't on that list, which I think would be there, the three-letter phrases DUI and DWI.
[34:10.520 --> 34:14.520]  The fact that the D stands for driving implies that that's a commercial-specific crime.
[34:14.520 --> 34:21.520]  So would you add that to your list of deadly sins, not that I advocate drunk driving or anything, but you get what I'm trying to say?
[34:21.520 --> 34:30.520]  Well, like I say, if they use the term driving, which they would have to do, they can't use the abbreviation.
[34:30.520 --> 34:36.520]  They have to state in court a factual basis for driving under the influence.
[34:36.520 --> 34:48.520]  Okay. So if the moment they say it, you're going to object to it. It's still driving. It's not the DUI part. It's the D part.
[34:48.520 --> 34:51.520]  But if they don't say driving, they just say the letter is DUI.
[34:51.520 --> 35:03.520]  They can't. The courts have already ruled that they can't use slang nomenclature to prove a case in court, nor can they use it in the complaint.
[35:03.520 --> 35:07.520]  They have to state it.
[35:07.520 --> 35:25.520]  The statute doesn't call it a DUI. The statute says driving while intoxicated, DWI, or driving under the influence, or DRI, or DWI driving while impaired.
[35:25.520 --> 35:29.520]  Okay. Thanks. That might actually tie into what I was going to ask you next.
[35:29.520 --> 35:32.520]  I asked you this back in the day, but I forgot what you told me.
[35:32.520 --> 35:42.520]  In your Infowars presentation, when you gave the case law, which makes it clear that people have the right to travel, but driving and transportation is a privilege because that's commercial.
[35:42.520 --> 35:55.520]  A couple of issues with those case law cases, they did use the words in the 8th Amendment, like the U.S. Supreme Court Williams v. Spears case that quote had the word transportation and the words of vehicle.
[35:55.520 --> 36:01.520]  And maybe I think driving actually did appear in some of the other cases you used, even though it was making it clear.
[36:01.520 --> 36:21.520]  Right? But if you look at those opinions, those opinions are older when those definitions specifically didn't exist the way they do now, and they hinge upon the use, not whether you're actually behind the wheel and in control of it.
[36:21.520 --> 36:32.520]  There are several of those cases that actually say an automobile is a motor vehicle if it's being used for this purpose.
[36:32.520 --> 36:46.520]  In other words, it's exactly the same as far as mechanical makeup build and the way it looks, but the use is the distinguishing factor.
[36:46.520 --> 37:05.520]  Okay, thanks. Another thing I want to clear up, back in the day I told you about what Deborah said about how PSA tickets, and maybe not just, excuse me, airport tickets, they have you listed as a passenger and that's a commercial specific term.
[37:05.520 --> 37:18.520]  And she said, well, that is like a loophole that gives them the authority to search you and violate your Fourth Amendment and unalienable right to that kind of search because you're in commerce because you're a passenger.
[37:18.520 --> 37:27.520]  But you once told me buying a ticket does not put you in commerce because you're paying for the service, but is an exception if they're calling you a passenger.
[37:27.520 --> 37:34.520]  And if that's the case, then we need to make people aware of this, that this is how they're searching us illegally and getting away with it.
[37:34.520 --> 37:41.520]  Okay. Again, the term passenger is a legal capacity created by the statute, correct?
[37:41.520 --> 37:42.520]  Right.
[37:42.520 --> 37:50.520]  A person in a taxicab paying to be moved is a passenger, right?
[37:50.520 --> 37:52.520]  But if their ticket says so.
[37:52.520 --> 37:55.520]  No, a taxicab doesn't have tickets, okay?
[37:55.520 --> 37:56.520]  Oh, okay.
[37:56.520 --> 38:06.520]  A person in a taxicab paying the driver to take them from point A to point B is a passenger, right?
[38:06.520 --> 38:08.520]  Good question.
[38:08.520 --> 38:11.520]  Well, no, it's not a good question.
[38:11.520 --> 38:14.520]  He is paying the driver to move him.
[38:14.520 --> 38:16.520]  Okay.
[38:16.520 --> 38:28.520]  However, does taking advantage of that service require you to waive rights that are inherent protected rights in order to do so?
[38:28.520 --> 38:29.520]  No.
[38:29.520 --> 38:36.520]  Exactly.
[38:36.520 --> 38:54.520]  Now, the difference there, again, is whether or not you're in a mass transit situation like you are on an airline, where if you are doing something dangerous and bad, you're not the only one who's going to pay the price for it.
[38:54.520 --> 38:59.520]  The problem there is the circumstances and conditions in which your things are going on.
[38:59.520 --> 39:05.520]  You're not waiving any of your rights in order to be a passenger on an airline.
[39:05.520 --> 39:10.520]  But the security risk can certainly be greater, no question of that.
[39:10.520 --> 39:12.520]  So where do you draw the line on it?
[39:12.520 --> 39:17.520]  And I know I'm not advocating anybody's rights get waived or infringed upon to do those things.
[39:17.520 --> 39:19.520]  Don't get me wrong.
[39:19.520 --> 39:23.520]  I'm just simply putting it out there for people to evaluate.
[39:23.520 --> 39:41.520]  Where would you draw the line on the risk of someone taking something harmful to the plane or the people on it on board because they couldn't be screened or checked or whatever?
[39:41.520 --> 39:43.520]  You follow what I'm saying?
[39:43.520 --> 39:44.520]  Yeah.
[39:44.520 --> 39:59.520]  So to me, it would be one of those things where, you know, I don't have a problem with them doing the same thing they would do in other cases like, you know, like the Israelis do it.
[39:59.520 --> 40:04.520]  The Israelis, in their airports, no one has to touch your luggage.
[40:04.520 --> 40:10.520]  The dogs they use can sniff luggage on the go, and they're much better trained than the ones we have in the U.S.
[40:10.520 --> 40:15.520]  If there's explosives in there, that dog will know it, then they have probable cause.
[40:15.520 --> 40:20.520]  If there's drugs in there, their dogs will know it, then they have probable cause.
[40:20.520 --> 40:33.520]  The only place where the dog may have a problem is if someone is transporting a highly contagious and dangerous virus or some other biohazard that the dog isn't trained to identify.
[40:33.520 --> 40:40.520]  There's always risk with being mixed in with other people. There's just no way around it.
[40:40.520 --> 40:44.520]  So I'm still going with Benjamin Franklin.
[40:44.520 --> 40:53.520]  Those who would give up liberty for a little security deserve neither and will lose both.
[40:53.520 --> 40:55.520]  That's definitely true with the way the government is tyrannical.
[40:55.520 --> 41:04.520]  All right. One final question. Winston Shroud told me he thinks that the Commerce Clause was put in the Constitution so that one merchant can screw over another merchant.
[41:04.520 --> 41:06.520]  Do you believe that that is true?
[41:06.520 --> 41:10.520]  No, I do not. All of the founding fathers were businessmen.
[41:10.520 --> 41:15.520]  Why would they agree to a rule that let them screw each other over? How idiotic is that?
[41:15.520 --> 41:24.520]  The Commerce Clause was put there. If you actually read the way it's written and you go back and read the information on what was going on at the time,
[41:24.520 --> 41:31.520]  the Commerce Clause was put in place so that the states could not take advantage of each other,
[41:31.520 --> 41:39.520]  that the federal government could regulate commerce between the states so that two or three states couldn't control a product
[41:39.520 --> 41:45.520]  and charge anything they wanted for it because they were the only ones that supplied it.
[41:45.520 --> 41:53.520]  It was to keep commerce regular between the states. That's what regulate means.
[41:53.520 --> 42:01.520]  And again, none of the states are allowed to tax any goods that go between the states.
[42:01.520 --> 42:06.520]  They can't charge tariffs on them. They're not supposed to be able to do any of those things.
[42:06.520 --> 42:15.520]  And that power was given to the federal government to ensure that the states didn't abuse that or violate it.
[42:15.520 --> 42:21.520]  And that was to be the extent of it, not for them to put their hands in everything done within the state,
[42:21.520 --> 42:25.520]  but to make sure that once it crossed between the states,
[42:25.520 --> 42:31.520]  that the states were not using it in a manner that violated any provision of the Constitution
[42:31.520 --> 42:35.520]  or the economic structure that the entire country was relying on.
[42:35.520 --> 42:41.520]  It wasn't so people could screw each other over. It was so they couldn't.
[42:41.520 --> 42:51.520]  But of course, like everything else put into federal hands, it became an avenue of abuse.
[42:51.520 --> 42:53.520]  All right. All right. Thanks, Eddie.
[42:53.520 --> 42:55.520]  All right. Thanks for calling in.
[42:55.520 --> 42:57.520]  You're welcome. Take care.
[42:57.520 --> 43:04.520]  All right. Now, Eric, in California, I've got about 45 seconds to break so you can get started,
[43:04.520 --> 43:08.520]  but I'm going to cut you off real quick and tell you to hold on. So what do you got?
[43:08.520 --> 43:15.520]  Okay. I got a letter in the mail saying that I have a court date on March 9th for an arraignment.
[43:15.520 --> 43:17.520]  And the charge is a misdemeanor.
[43:17.520 --> 43:26.520]  It's a criminal code that says it's unlawful to dump waste on public or private highway or road or private property.
[43:26.520 --> 43:30.520]  And they're basically accusing you of dumping a large amount of trash.
[43:30.520 --> 43:33.520]  It says commercial quantity on something.
[43:33.520 --> 43:38.520]  All right. Well, hang on, Eric, and we will pick that up on the other side, okay?
[43:38.520 --> 43:43.520]  All right, folks, call in number 512-646-1984.
[43:43.520 --> 43:45.520]  Give us a call. Give us a holler.
[43:45.520 --> 43:49.520]  We need someone to talk to, and we got a few people on the board, but we're going to need more.
[43:49.520 --> 44:00.520]  All right. Y'all hang in there. We will be right back after this break.
[44:00.520 --> 44:03.520]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.520 --> 44:10.520]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[44:10.520 --> 44:14.520]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.520 --> 44:18.520]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:18.520 --> 44:22.520]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:22.520 --> 44:27.520]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.520 --> 44:33.520]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:33.520 --> 44:38.520]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:38.520 --> 44:42.520]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.520 --> 44:48.520]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:48.520 --> 45:03.520]  pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.520 --> 45:09.520]  Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store
[45:09.520 --> 45:14.520]  at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas, hiring brave new books and chase tanks
[45:14.520 --> 45:18.520]  to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.520 --> 45:23.520]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.520 --> 45:27.520]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil,
[45:27.520 --> 45:31.520]  lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.520 --> 45:38.520]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.520 --> 45:44.520]  That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.520 --> 45:48.520]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.520 --> 46:14.520]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.520 --> 46:26.520]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:26.520 --> 46:32.520]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[46:32.520 --> 46:37.520]  All right, Eric, you said you got a notice in mail about illegal dumping,
[46:37.520 --> 46:42.520]  and they're accusing you of dumping a commercial quantity of trash on someone's lawn,
[46:42.520 --> 46:46.520]  I believe you were saying when you were going out there?
[46:46.520 --> 46:47.520]  Yeah, that's right.
[46:47.520 --> 46:51.520]  Okay, and where is this lawn located?
[46:51.520 --> 46:53.520]  They haven't actually told me.
[46:53.520 --> 46:57.520]  They haven't given me an address or the name of the person.
[46:57.520 --> 47:02.520]  I know, I mean, they told me vaguely where it is.
[47:02.520 --> 47:06.520]  I know it's in Newberry Park, which is an unincorporated area, a thousand ounce.
[47:06.520 --> 47:09.520]  Which is how far from you?
[47:09.520 --> 47:12.520]  That's the city I live in, not as far as where I live.
[47:12.520 --> 47:16.520]  Okay, but again, how far from you?
[47:16.520 --> 47:23.520]  Do you actually have any clue where this house that this lawn belongs to may be?
[47:23.520 --> 47:29.520]  Well, from the area that they described to me, it's less than a mile, but I don't know.
[47:29.520 --> 47:30.520]  I don't have an address.
[47:30.520 --> 47:32.520]  I don't know his street name or anything like that.
[47:32.520 --> 47:39.520]  Okay, and how are they alleging that it's you that dumped the trash?
[47:39.520 --> 47:45.520]  Okay, well, there were some letters and envelopes found in the trash,
[47:45.520 --> 47:48.520]  and it had my address on it and my name.
[47:48.520 --> 47:52.520]  And so apparently this guy assumed that I was the one that dumped the trash,
[47:52.520 --> 47:59.520]  and he came to my house one day when I wasn't home and was knocking on the door
[47:59.520 --> 48:05.520]  and was screaming his head off and trying to get someone to answer the door.
[48:05.520 --> 48:11.520]  And we called the police on him, and he had left by the time they got there.
[48:11.520 --> 48:16.520]  This happened twice, and then after that, they went and talked to him.
[48:16.520 --> 48:20.520]  They found, because we saw his license plate, so we gave that information to the police.
[48:20.520 --> 48:25.520]  They went to his house and talked to him, and he told them the story about how he saw someone dumping trash,
[48:25.520 --> 48:30.520]  someone pulling up in a car and dumping trash on the road or his lawn.
[48:30.520 --> 48:31.520]  I don't know.
[48:31.520 --> 48:33.520]  Their story has changed, actually.
[48:33.520 --> 48:39.520]  But, you know, he claims that he saw me doing this and then driving away.
[48:39.520 --> 48:44.520]  Has he actually laid physical eyes on you?
[48:44.520 --> 48:46.520]  That's what he claims.
[48:46.520 --> 48:47.520]  No, no, no.
[48:47.520 --> 48:53.520]  To your knowledge, have you ever seen this dude face to face?
[48:53.520 --> 48:54.520]  No.
[48:54.520 --> 48:55.520]  Okay.
[48:55.520 --> 48:56.520]  To my knowledge, no.
[48:56.520 --> 48:58.520]  Are you a public figure of any kind?
[48:58.520 --> 48:59.520]  No.
[48:59.520 --> 49:03.520]  Are there any pictures of you that he would get access to anywhere
[49:03.520 --> 49:06.520]  that would show him what you looked like before him?
[49:06.520 --> 49:08.520]  No, not that I know of.
[49:08.520 --> 49:11.520]  What physical description was given to the police on the report?
[49:11.520 --> 49:15.520]  Is it you or is it not?
[49:15.520 --> 49:21.520]  He described, he gave kind of a vague description, someone my height and weight
[49:21.520 --> 49:25.520]  and, you know, facial hair.
[49:25.520 --> 49:28.520]  That's all they said to me.
[49:28.520 --> 49:31.520]  That's what the cops said to you?
[49:31.520 --> 49:32.520]  Yeah.
[49:32.520 --> 49:33.520]  Okay.
[49:33.520 --> 49:34.520]  Well, I'm not asking what the cops said.
[49:34.520 --> 49:37.520]  Don't ever believe what the cops said.
[49:37.520 --> 49:41.520]  The cop is trying to get somebody to admit to something.
[49:41.520 --> 49:47.520]  Read the police report the guy made.
[49:47.520 --> 49:48.520]  Right.
[49:48.520 --> 49:49.520]  I don't have a copy of the report yet.
[49:49.520 --> 49:51.520]  In fact, they didn't give me any kind of a complaint or citation.
[49:51.520 --> 49:52.520]  Right.
[49:52.520 --> 49:56.520]  That's why you need to go down to the police department and get it.
[49:56.520 --> 49:57.520]  Yeah.
[49:57.520 --> 50:02.520]  I will tomorrow.
[50:02.520 --> 50:05.520]  Now, one of my questions is the arraignment.
[50:05.520 --> 50:11.520]  I understand the purpose of an arraignment is to identify the accused and to enter a plea.
[50:11.520 --> 50:14.520]  Do not ever enter a plea.
[50:14.520 --> 50:17.520]  Do not enter a plea.
[50:17.520 --> 50:19.520]  Right, I understand that.
[50:19.520 --> 50:25.520]  Now, I've heard you talk about this before, that you tell them that you ask,
[50:25.520 --> 50:31.520]  does the court intend to compel me to enter an unconscionable plea?
[50:31.520 --> 50:32.520]  Correct.
[50:32.520 --> 50:37.520]  Now, what if they just avoid answering that question?
[50:37.520 --> 50:38.520]  They just say...
[50:38.520 --> 50:42.520]  Well, they can't avoid answering the question.
[50:42.520 --> 50:46.520]  They only gain jurisdiction to enter a plea on your behalf if you refuse.
[50:46.520 --> 50:50.520]  You are not refusing, and you're going to make sure that everything is on the record showing.
[50:50.520 --> 50:57.520]  I am not refusing to enter a plea, but I haven't been given any notice of any kind as to what I'm being charged with.
[50:57.520 --> 51:02.520]  No one served me with a copy of a complaint, a charging instrument, anything.
[51:02.520 --> 51:05.520]  For all I know, you guys are trying to get me to enter a plea to murder.
[51:05.520 --> 51:08.520]  I have no idea.
[51:08.520 --> 51:12.520]  Okay.
[51:12.520 --> 51:13.520]  Okay.
[51:13.520 --> 51:17.520]  And what about when they ask me to identify myself?
[51:17.520 --> 51:19.520]  What do I tell them?
[51:19.520 --> 51:22.520]  Name, address, and date of birth.
[51:22.520 --> 51:29.520]  Okay.
[51:29.520 --> 51:36.520]  Do you have any sort of alibi for the timeframe when this was supposed to have occurred?
[51:36.520 --> 51:46.520]  Well, I had a...my car was actually being...I drove my car to the repair shop that's nearby,
[51:46.520 --> 51:49.520]  and so I was actually driving around that time.
[51:49.520 --> 51:53.520]  I don't know what time he claims his truck trash was dumped, but...
[51:53.520 --> 51:56.520]  Again, that's why you need the police report, details.
[51:56.520 --> 51:57.520]  Yeah.
[51:57.520 --> 51:58.520]  Right.
[51:58.520 --> 52:01.520]  And I'll get that.
[52:01.520 --> 52:07.520]  The car was in need of repair, and I could only drive at a very short distance,
[52:07.520 --> 52:14.520]  so the idea that I would take it somewhere and stop and dump trash would be very risky.
[52:14.520 --> 52:17.520]  I mean, there's no way I would be able to stop it and attempt to start it again,
[52:17.520 --> 52:19.520]  because I had a towing company...
[52:19.520 --> 52:22.520]  Well, that's not going to be something you can argue.
[52:22.520 --> 52:25.520]  That's not going to be provable.
[52:25.520 --> 52:26.520]  Yeah.
[52:26.520 --> 52:31.520]  What I'm asking as far as an alibi, is there some way for you to prove
[52:31.520 --> 52:37.520]  that it's not possible for you to be the one that did what he's saying was done?
[52:37.520 --> 52:43.520]  Were you in someone else's presence that can prove you weren't there and testify to that?
[52:43.520 --> 52:49.520]  Were you at some place where there were other witnesses or other people that knew you
[52:49.520 --> 52:55.520]  or that you were there, therefore you could not have been where this guy says you were?
[52:55.520 --> 52:58.520]  Any of that?
[52:58.520 --> 53:03.520]  Off the top of my head, no, but once I get the police report, I might,
[53:03.520 --> 53:06.520]  depending on the time that he says has happened...
[53:06.520 --> 53:09.520]  Well, you better try to make a real good recollection of everything that happened
[53:09.520 --> 53:13.520]  on the specific day and find out if that's possible.
[53:13.520 --> 53:18.520]  The problem is whether or not he can identify you specifically.
[53:18.520 --> 53:23.520]  If he's never laid eyes on you in any way or form,
[53:23.520 --> 53:29.520]  then there's no way he can possibly identify you from other individuals, right?
[53:29.520 --> 53:31.520]  Right.
[53:31.520 --> 53:40.520]  But if he has, then he can ID you whether he's ever actually met you in person or not, can't he?
[53:40.520 --> 53:42.520]  No, he can't.
[53:42.520 --> 53:45.520]  No, he can't?
[53:45.520 --> 53:46.520]  Why can't he?
[53:46.520 --> 53:49.520]  If I saw a picture of you and then looked at you in person,
[53:49.520 --> 53:54.520]  I couldn't identify you and say, yeah, that's the guy.
[53:54.520 --> 53:56.520]  Yeah, I'm sorry, he could.
[53:56.520 --> 54:02.520]  What I think could have happened is that the one thing that keeps going through my head
[54:02.520 --> 54:07.520]  is that maybe I cut him off on the road somewhere and he followed me home
[54:07.520 --> 54:11.520]  and got a good look at me and saw my car parked in the driveway,
[54:11.520 --> 54:17.520]  got a description of that car, and then we went and took some trash out of my trash can
[54:17.520 --> 54:26.520]  or my mailbox and I have noticed mail missing on several occasions.
[54:26.520 --> 54:30.520]  Again, how are you going to prove that?
[54:30.520 --> 54:34.520]  I can't really prove any of that, but that's my only theory.
[54:34.520 --> 54:36.520]  Well, see, that's the problem.
[54:36.520 --> 54:41.520]  If he can identify you personally, then it's simply him saying,
[54:41.520 --> 54:50.520]  yeah, that's the guy and you have no way to say no, it's not.
[54:50.520 --> 54:56.520]  Okay, that's going to be your problem.
[54:56.520 --> 55:00.520]  So you need to file a motion for discovery, ASAP,
[55:00.520 --> 55:04.520]  and whatever constitutes a public information request there in California
[55:04.520 --> 55:10.520]  and get the police report and everything else that you can get your hands on.
[55:10.520 --> 55:14.520]  Make sure that you get any audio and video recordings that were made
[55:14.520 --> 55:19.520]  while this guy was being interviewed so that you can compare what he actually said
[55:19.520 --> 55:27.520]  to what's actually written in the police reports and so on and so forth.
[55:27.520 --> 55:33.520]  So don't get just the written document, get everything.
[55:33.520 --> 55:42.520]  Yeah, well, now the other thing is that on the letter that I received in the mail,
[55:42.520 --> 55:46.520]  it says, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct
[55:46.520 --> 55:49.520]  and that this complaint consists of one count.
[55:49.520 --> 55:55.520]  And it's got the district attorney and the deputy district attorney's names under it,
[55:55.520 --> 55:57.520]  but they didn't sign it.
[55:57.520 --> 55:59.520]  They can't sign the complaint.
[55:59.520 --> 56:05.520]  They can verify it, but they can't sign it.
[56:05.520 --> 56:07.520]  Okay.
[56:07.520 --> 56:17.520]  The prosecuting attorney's office can never be the initiator of the criminal cause.
[56:17.520 --> 56:20.520]  So who actually signed the complaint?
[56:20.520 --> 56:25.520]  Again, you need to check the court record and see what's in it.
[56:25.520 --> 56:30.520]  Okay, so it would have to be this guy or it to be valid, right?
[56:30.520 --> 56:34.520]  Well, no, a cop could sign it if he believes the guy,
[56:34.520 --> 56:39.520]  but the guy's the only one to come in and testify to it.
[56:39.520 --> 56:44.520]  Anyone can sign a criminal complaint except for the court officers
[56:44.520 --> 56:47.520]  or anyone working for them that are going to hear the case
[56:47.520 --> 56:52.520]  or the prosecuting attorney's office that's going to prosecute the case.
[56:52.520 --> 56:55.520]  No one, anyone else can.
[56:55.520 --> 57:05.520]  Those can't, but anyone else can.
[57:05.520 --> 57:07.520]  Hello?
[57:07.520 --> 57:13.520]  Any relevant issues with jurisdiction that I should bring up?
[57:13.520 --> 57:16.520]  Well, not from what you're telling me.
[57:16.520 --> 57:23.520]  What jurisdiction could you possibly challenge here?
[57:23.520 --> 57:24.520]  I don't know.
[57:24.520 --> 57:26.520]  As far as I know, there's no driving.
[57:26.520 --> 57:27.520]  Exactly.
[57:27.520 --> 57:32.520]  This will probably be an offense under the penal code and not under some regulatory code.
[57:32.520 --> 57:34.520]  Yeah, it is a penal code, yeah.
[57:34.520 --> 57:35.520]  Okay.
[57:35.520 --> 57:38.520]  Then that's a separate issue.
[57:38.520 --> 57:45.520]  And a penal code offense merits is all you've got.
[57:45.520 --> 57:51.520]  Okay.
[57:51.520 --> 57:52.520]  All right.
[57:52.520 --> 57:57.520]  Okay, Eric, well, anything else?
[57:57.520 --> 57:59.520]  Well, I have one more question.
[57:59.520 --> 58:03.520]  Okay, if you'll hold on, I'll pick you up on the other side and get it from you there, okay?
[58:03.520 --> 58:05.520]  Okay.
[58:05.520 --> 58:08.520]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[58:08.520 --> 58:13.520]  Call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[58:13.520 --> 58:14.520]  We're going to keep on going here.
[58:14.520 --> 58:17.520]  We'll finish up with Eric on the other side, and we'll get to the rest of our callers.
[58:17.520 --> 58:46.520]  So, folks, you all hang in there, and we will be right back after this top-of-the-hour break.
[58:46.520 --> 58:47.520]  We'll be right back.
[59:16.520 --> 59:18.520]  We'll be right back.
[59:47.520 --> 59:50.520]  That's prestudybible.com.
[59:50.520 --> 01:00:02.520]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.520 --> 01:00:08.520]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty News and activist updates, online at thelibertybeat.com.
[01:00:08.520 --> 01:00:13.520]  I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, February 23, 2015.
[01:00:13.520 --> 01:00:21.520]  Gold is trading at $1,203, silver at $16.24, and bitcoin is trading around $236.93.
[01:00:21.520 --> 01:00:27.520]  Today's bitcoin price, brought to you by Express Coin, the fastest, most reliable way to buy bitcoin.
[01:00:27.520 --> 01:00:29.520]  Buy bitcoin today at expresscoin.com.
[01:00:29.520 --> 01:00:32.520]  Your job, your home, your car, your money.
[01:00:32.520 --> 01:00:35.520]  All of these things provide you with a sense of security.
[01:00:35.520 --> 01:00:37.520]  But what about your family security?
[01:00:37.520 --> 01:00:40.520]  What have you done to prepare if all of these things were suddenly gone?
[01:00:40.520 --> 01:00:44.520]  E-Foods Direct has the food security you need for every emergency.
[01:00:44.520 --> 01:00:47.520]  E-Foods Direct is food security.
[01:00:47.520 --> 01:00:57.520]  Go to efoodsdirect.com slash Liberty Beat or call 800-620-5520 and mention Liberty Beat for 50% off their food preparation planning packs.
[01:00:57.520 --> 01:01:01.520]  In the news, despite warnings from Homeland Security Secretary Jay Johnson,
[01:01:01.520 --> 01:01:05.520]  there's no credible threat to U.S. shopping malls, according to the agency.
[01:01:05.520 --> 01:01:13.520]  Jay Johnson appeared on CNN's State of the Union discussing an alleged threat from the Al-Shabaab terrorist organization.
[01:01:13.520 --> 01:01:20.520]  Around 100 activists in Emoryville, California shut down a Home Depot following the shooting death of a woman by two local police officers.
[01:01:20.520 --> 01:01:26.520]  On February 3rd, Yvette Henderson was shot after allegedly shoplifting and attempting to steal a vehicle.
[01:01:26.520 --> 01:01:34.520]  Activists with Black Lives Matter protested outside the store, causing the owners to close for several hours.
[01:01:34.520 --> 01:01:39.520]  In celebration of the launch of the new and improved SovereignLiving.com every day this week,
[01:01:39.520 --> 01:01:44.520]  the Liberty Beat will bring you a simple survival tip that just might save your life.
[01:01:44.520 --> 01:01:46.520]  Here's John Bush with today's tip.
[01:01:46.520 --> 01:01:48.520]  It's important to be prepared.
[01:01:48.520 --> 01:01:50.520]  Save plastic bottles and fill them with water.
[01:01:50.520 --> 01:01:59.520]  After your family finishes a juice bottle or milk jug, clean out the bottle, fill it with water, and place it in a cool, dark area like a closet or storage room.
[01:01:59.520 --> 01:02:02.520]  Cycle through the water as plastic tends to break down over time.
[01:02:02.520 --> 01:02:08.520]  It helps to have a high-quality water filter if you plan to be drinking or cooking with the water and has been sitting for a few months.
[01:02:08.520 --> 01:02:12.520]  My family has used this method of water storage and it has come in handy on several occasions,
[01:02:12.520 --> 01:02:16.520]  as the municipal water supply we were once connected to failed several times.
[01:02:16.520 --> 01:02:23.520]  Without the stored water, we wouldn't have been able to flush our toilet and we would not have had any water for food preparation.
[01:02:23.520 --> 01:02:28.520]  The Liberty Beat is sponsored by Coinarch, offering innovative online trading solutions for Bitcoin.
[01:02:28.520 --> 01:02:34.520]  Visit Coinarch.com and sign up using coupon code MAX and get free brokerage for the first seven days.
[01:02:34.520 --> 01:02:37.520]  It only takes $10 to start an account.
[01:02:37.520 --> 01:02:39.520]  That's Coinarch.com.
[01:02:39.520 --> 01:02:48.520]  Support also comes from Cabo Bob's, southwestern-style burritos, now with two locations in Austin, 500 East Bend Y Boulevard and 2828 Rio Grande Boulevard.
[01:02:48.520 --> 01:02:50.520]  Find them online at Cabobobs.com.
[01:02:50.520 --> 01:02:55.520]  This is the Liberty Beat for Monday, February 23, 2015.
[01:02:55.520 --> 01:02:59.520]  Check out the website at thelibertybeat.com.
[01:03:26.520 --> 01:03:29.520]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:29.520 --> 01:03:31.520]  We are talking to Eric in California.
[01:03:31.520 --> 01:03:34.520]  All right, Eric, what was your last question?
[01:03:34.520 --> 01:03:38.520]  Okay, my last question is what do they need to prove in court for this?
[01:03:38.520 --> 01:03:40.520]  Well, you need to read the charge.
[01:03:40.520 --> 01:03:45.520]  The elements of what they, the elements they have to prove are in the language of the charge.
[01:03:45.520 --> 01:03:52.520]  They have to prove a time, a place that you committed the act and that there's no doubt that you committed the act
[01:03:52.520 --> 01:03:58.520]  and what the act itself was and what the individual elements of the act are.
[01:03:58.520 --> 01:04:00.520]  Okay.
[01:04:00.520 --> 01:04:12.520]  So they have to identify the trash as belonging to you, that you are the one that dumped it, and what date, what time, what location, and so on and so forth.
[01:04:12.520 --> 01:04:14.520]  Okay.
[01:04:14.520 --> 01:04:18.520]  Now, it also mentions commercial quantity, which is...
[01:04:18.520 --> 01:04:23.520]  They would have to prove that if that's cited in the complaint.
[01:04:23.520 --> 01:04:30.520]  So you need to also look and see what the statute defines as a commercial quantity.
[01:04:30.520 --> 01:04:33.520]  Right. It's three cubic yards.
[01:04:33.520 --> 01:04:39.520]  Three cubic yards is nine feet by nine feet.
[01:04:39.520 --> 01:04:42.520]  Right.
[01:04:42.520 --> 01:04:47.520]  So how much trash was in this guy's yard?
[01:04:47.520 --> 01:04:48.520]  I don't know.
[01:04:48.520 --> 01:04:52.520]  I have to see the complaints and see if they took a measurement of it.
[01:04:52.520 --> 01:04:53.520]  I don't know.
[01:04:53.520 --> 01:04:55.520]  Okay.
[01:04:55.520 --> 01:04:58.520]  Well, here's the thing.
[01:04:58.520 --> 01:05:07.520]  If they only bring part of the trash to court, they've got a problem.
[01:05:07.520 --> 01:05:15.520]  Because now, again, the commercial quantity, when it says three by three, is that compressed or uncompressed?
[01:05:15.520 --> 01:05:16.520]  That's something you got to know.
[01:05:16.520 --> 01:05:20.520]  What does the statute require for it to be three yards by three yards?
[01:05:20.520 --> 01:05:21.520]  All right.
[01:05:21.520 --> 01:05:29.520]  Now, on this nine foot by nine foot square, one of the ways to prove that this guy had been setting you up for this was to show
[01:05:29.520 --> 01:05:38.520]  the potential probability that the mail that was used to identify you spanned a long timeframe.
[01:05:38.520 --> 01:05:44.520]  Now, it's not a guaranteed way of proving it, of course, but it's one thing that would help.
[01:05:44.520 --> 01:05:46.520]  You understand what I'm saying?
[01:05:46.520 --> 01:05:52.520]  Like, this mail is from June and this is from August or of the following year even.
[01:05:52.520 --> 01:05:55.520]  But is this guy held a grudge against you that long?
[01:05:55.520 --> 01:05:56.520]  I don't know.
[01:05:56.520 --> 01:06:01.520]  But anyway, you need to read the statute and look at all this other stuff.
[01:06:01.520 --> 01:06:02.520]  Okay.
[01:06:02.520 --> 01:06:03.520]  Okay.
[01:06:03.520 --> 01:06:04.520]  All right.
[01:06:04.520 --> 01:06:05.520]  All right.
[01:06:05.520 --> 01:06:06.520]  Good luck.
[01:06:06.520 --> 01:06:07.520]  Thanks a lot.
[01:06:07.520 --> 01:06:08.520]  You're welcome.
[01:06:08.520 --> 01:06:09.520]  All right.
[01:06:09.520 --> 01:06:11.520]  Now we're going to go to Steve in Texas.
[01:06:11.520 --> 01:06:13.520]  Steve, what can we do for you?
[01:06:13.520 --> 01:06:14.520]  Yeah.
[01:06:14.520 --> 01:06:22.520]  I have a question kind of along the lines of first caller when he was, you know, mentioned all crime is commercial.
[01:06:22.520 --> 01:06:23.520]  Uh-huh.
[01:06:23.520 --> 01:06:34.520]  If when the state charges a murdered defendant and the court documents charging him, is his name as the defendant, is that going to appear in all capital letters?
[01:06:34.520 --> 01:06:35.520]  It may.
[01:06:35.520 --> 01:06:36.520]  It may not.
[01:06:36.520 --> 01:06:44.520]  Well, I was wondering because if it did, that would seem like then it would be commercial.
[01:06:44.520 --> 01:06:45.520]  Why?
[01:06:45.520 --> 01:06:53.520]  Well, the defendant would be listed as a commercial entity if it was in all capital letters.
[01:06:53.520 --> 01:06:56.520]  And what are you basing that assertion on?
[01:06:56.520 --> 01:07:00.520]  That's the way they do it in commerce.
[01:07:00.520 --> 01:07:02.520]  Again, prove that.
[01:07:02.520 --> 01:07:14.520]  Are you saying that simply because corporations are required to put their name in all caps that they can't do it with living people?
[01:07:14.520 --> 01:07:17.520]  No, I'm not saying that.
[01:07:17.520 --> 01:07:18.520]  Okay.
[01:07:18.520 --> 01:07:24.520]  Then how are you concluding that living people are somehow turned into something commercial because that's what they did?
[01:07:24.520 --> 01:07:26.520]  Well, they're not.
[01:07:26.520 --> 01:07:29.520]  I'm just saying the name, how they're spelling it out.
[01:07:29.520 --> 01:07:37.520]  The man would still be there, but if the defendant was listed in all caps, they had his name in all capital letters.
[01:07:37.520 --> 01:07:38.520]  Okay.
[01:07:38.520 --> 01:07:39.520]  That's what I said you just said.
[01:07:39.520 --> 01:07:42.520]  What I'm asking you to do is prove that.
[01:07:42.520 --> 01:07:47.520]  Well, whenever I get a bill, it's on all capital letters.
[01:07:47.520 --> 01:07:48.520]  So what?
[01:07:48.520 --> 01:07:49.520]  So what?
[01:07:49.520 --> 01:07:50.520]  Capital letters.
[01:07:50.520 --> 01:07:51.520]  So what?
[01:07:51.520 --> 01:07:53.520]  Well, that's just generally how they do it.
[01:07:53.520 --> 01:07:59.520]  If I sent you a bill with your entire name in lowercase, does that mean you don't owe the bill?
[01:07:59.520 --> 01:08:10.520]  If I didn't capitalize anything, would that make you any different than you are in the fact that you owe me the money?
[01:08:10.520 --> 01:08:11.520]  I'm not sure.
[01:08:11.520 --> 01:08:16.520]  Once they used all capital letters, as far as I know, that's the commercial way.
[01:08:16.520 --> 01:08:30.520]  You know, that's the patronet allegation, but that's not factually been proven, and the courts have said that ain't the way it works.
[01:08:30.520 --> 01:08:33.520]  You have, I guess I could look that up.
[01:08:33.520 --> 01:08:37.520]  Well, you can look it up, but what are you going to use as a source?
[01:08:37.520 --> 01:08:45.520]  If all you're going to do is go back to the patronet web pages and say this is what they're doing, and they don't bother to put anything up there that proves it,
[01:08:45.520 --> 01:08:47.520]  what good is that going to do you?
[01:08:47.520 --> 01:08:48.520]  Some sort of case.
[01:08:48.520 --> 01:08:52.520]  I guess I would have to look up the case law on that.
[01:08:52.520 --> 01:09:05.520]  I've never seen any valid case opinion that says the entering of a person's name in all caps makes them commercial.
[01:09:05.520 --> 01:09:06.520]  Yeah.
[01:09:06.520 --> 01:09:12.520]  I have seen patronets throw those cases out there claiming all kinds of stuff,
[01:09:12.520 --> 01:09:17.520]  and yet I have gone and pulled up every one of the cases they've ever tried to use that with
[01:09:17.520 --> 01:09:22.520]  and proven that everything they're saying is not even in the case.
[01:09:22.520 --> 01:09:24.520]  It's just not there.
[01:09:24.520 --> 01:09:25.520]  It doesn't exist.
[01:09:25.520 --> 01:09:28.520]  It's completely fabricated.
[01:09:28.520 --> 01:09:35.520]  Now, there is a statute article in the Code of Criminal Procedure that says when you're dealing with a corporation
[01:09:35.520 --> 01:09:42.520]  and the allegation is made that it is a corporation, then that will stand as factual until someone refutes it.
[01:09:42.520 --> 01:09:51.520]  That doesn't mean that's what they're doing to you because what they're saying is they're speaking directly against a corporate entity.
[01:09:51.520 --> 01:09:55.520]  Well, the government is a corporate entity now.
[01:09:55.520 --> 01:09:57.520]  No.
[01:09:57.520 --> 01:10:07.520]  The government has a corporate capacity in which it can contract, but so do you.
[01:10:07.520 --> 01:10:13.520]  But that doesn't make you a corporation just because you entered into a contract, does it?
[01:10:13.520 --> 01:10:14.520]  Right.
[01:10:14.520 --> 01:10:20.520]  But if the government is acting as a corporate entity all the time, then it would have to step out of that.
[01:10:20.520 --> 01:10:24.520]  Again, prove that in everything it does, that's what it's doing.
[01:10:24.520 --> 01:10:28.520]  That's the point.
[01:10:28.520 --> 01:10:36.520]  Government in its entirety is a fiction, all of it.
[01:10:36.520 --> 01:10:49.520]  The only question becomes is what part of the fiction has to be handled in what legal way in order to do certain legal things?
[01:10:49.520 --> 01:10:58.520]  Well, I was just wondering if you got a penal code violation, would your name appear in all capital letters?
[01:10:58.520 --> 01:11:14.520]  Because to me that would indicate that they're treating the situation as a corporation is being charged and the man can stand in for the corporation.
[01:11:14.520 --> 01:11:16.520]  No.
[01:11:16.520 --> 01:11:18.520]  That's not the way it works.
[01:11:18.520 --> 01:11:23.520]  Putting your name in caps does not make you a corporation.
[01:11:23.520 --> 01:11:27.520]  It just doesn't do it.
[01:11:27.520 --> 01:11:28.520]  No, it's not.
[01:11:28.520 --> 01:11:30.520]  No, it's not.
[01:11:30.520 --> 01:11:36.520]  In order for you to prove that you have to produce articles of incorporation using that exact name.
[01:11:36.520 --> 01:11:37.520]  Can you do that?
[01:11:37.520 --> 01:11:38.520]  Can they do that?
[01:11:38.520 --> 01:11:41.520]  No.
[01:11:41.520 --> 01:11:44.520]  That's exactly why the argument is wrong.
[01:11:44.520 --> 01:11:53.520]  There is a legal requirement that is put in place in order for a corporation to be formed.
[01:11:53.520 --> 01:11:56.520]  It's not done by magic or out of thin air.
[01:11:56.520 --> 01:11:58.520]  There's paperwork involved.
[01:11:58.520 --> 01:12:00.520]  Produce it.
[01:12:00.520 --> 01:12:02.520]  There isn't any, then it ain't.
[01:12:02.520 --> 01:12:04.520]  I thought it was, I thought the birth certificate.
[01:12:04.520 --> 01:12:05.520]  No, it's not.
[01:12:05.520 --> 01:12:16.520]  Please show me once again where that has ever been decided other than the patronut myth.
[01:12:16.520 --> 01:12:18.520]  I thought it was an adhesion contract.
[01:12:18.520 --> 01:12:19.520]  Had to be signed.
[01:12:19.520 --> 01:12:25.520]  How is it, how do you adhesion contract a three-minute old?
[01:12:25.520 --> 01:12:28.520]  They're incapable of contracting.
[01:12:28.520 --> 01:12:29.520]  Right.
[01:12:29.520 --> 01:12:33.520]  There's nothing on a birth certificate that is the terms of an agreement.
[01:12:33.520 --> 01:12:34.520]  How is it a contract?
[01:12:34.520 --> 01:12:37.520]  It doesn't meet any of the legal requirements of a contract.
[01:12:37.520 --> 01:12:41.520]  Why do they say parents only have custody rather than ownership?
[01:12:41.520 --> 01:12:42.520]  Who said that?
[01:12:42.520 --> 01:12:45.520]  That's the way I always read it.
[01:12:45.520 --> 01:12:46.520]  Read it from who?
[01:12:46.520 --> 01:12:47.520]  From where?
[01:12:47.520 --> 01:12:48.520]  What source?
[01:12:48.520 --> 01:12:49.520]  What reliable source?
[01:12:49.520 --> 01:12:54.520]  From people dealing with like-
[01:12:54.520 --> 01:12:55.520]  From people.
[01:12:55.520 --> 01:13:04.520]  Battles over a child because a man would always own his child over his wife.
[01:13:04.520 --> 01:13:05.520]  He would have ownership.
[01:13:05.520 --> 01:13:08.520]  It's named after him.
[01:13:08.520 --> 01:13:12.520]  Okay, that's a completely separate issue from the one we're talking about here.
[01:13:12.520 --> 01:13:14.520]  Yeah, we're trailing off here.
[01:13:14.520 --> 01:13:18.520]  I was still just wondering about if you got a penal code violation,
[01:13:18.520 --> 01:13:20.520]  would your name appear in all-
[01:13:20.520 --> 01:13:21.520]  It may, it may not.
[01:13:21.520 --> 01:13:24.520]  I failed to see how it would make a difference.
[01:13:24.520 --> 01:13:31.520]  What is going to make a difference is whether or not they're alleging a legal capacity in association with the charge
[01:13:31.520 --> 01:13:37.520]  in a legal capacity like a driver or an operator of a motor vehicle, for instance.
[01:13:37.520 --> 01:13:43.520]  That's a legal capacity that they're trying to shoehorn you into.
[01:13:43.520 --> 01:13:45.520]  Well, that one I get.
[01:13:45.520 --> 01:13:46.520]  Okay.
[01:13:46.520 --> 01:13:47.520]  But I was just wondering about-
[01:13:47.520 --> 01:13:53.520]  Well, your name is not the capacity, is it?
[01:13:53.520 --> 01:13:59.520]  Your name does not automatically equal driver or operator, does it?
[01:13:59.520 --> 01:14:00.520]  No.
[01:14:00.520 --> 01:14:01.520]  Right.
[01:14:01.520 --> 01:14:09.520]  The name is the individual being accused of being in that capacity, the one of.
[01:14:09.520 --> 01:14:10.520]  Right.
[01:14:10.520 --> 01:14:15.520]  But I'm going over to the penal code because there, if you were charged with some sort of crime,
[01:14:15.520 --> 01:14:18.520]  I was just wondering what they're going to name a defendant.
[01:14:18.520 --> 01:14:21.520]  They're going to charge you that way whether it's in the penal code or not.
[01:14:21.520 --> 01:14:23.520]  They're going to put it on there in uppercase, lowercase.
[01:14:23.520 --> 01:14:26.520]  They're going to misspell it, respell it.
[01:14:26.520 --> 01:14:29.520]  But they'll fix it if you tell them.
[01:14:29.520 --> 01:14:30.520]  I've watched them change it.
[01:14:30.520 --> 01:14:33.520]  Didn't change anything about what they did.
[01:14:33.520 --> 01:14:36.520]  Didn't change anything about what jurisdiction they presumed.
[01:14:36.520 --> 01:14:41.520]  They proceeded even though everything was proper case.
[01:14:41.520 --> 01:14:50.520]  No court has ever ruled that I've been able to find a valid case opinion on that the assertion you're making is correct.
[01:14:50.520 --> 01:14:55.520]  All right.
[01:14:55.520 --> 01:14:58.520]  Well, that's all I had to add.
[01:14:58.520 --> 01:14:59.520]  Okay.
[01:14:59.520 --> 01:15:00.520]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:15:00.520 --> 01:15:01.520]  Okay.
[01:15:01.520 --> 01:15:02.520]  Bye.
[01:15:02.520 --> 01:15:03.520]  Bye-bye.
[01:15:03.520 --> 01:15:04.520]  All right.
[01:15:04.520 --> 01:15:05.520]  We've got just under two minutes.
[01:15:05.520 --> 01:15:08.520]  Jimmy in Maryland, let's get you started before we take a break.
[01:15:08.520 --> 01:15:11.520]  How are you doing, Eddie?
[01:15:11.520 --> 01:15:12.520]  Doing all right.
[01:15:12.520 --> 01:15:13.520]  Good.
[01:15:13.520 --> 01:15:22.520]  I just want to ask you, I have a coming up here, they call it a show cause hearing for violation of probation.
[01:15:22.520 --> 01:15:29.520]  Now, I never attended one of them before, and I just was wondering how should I go about handling this situation?
[01:15:29.520 --> 01:15:30.520]  Okay.
[01:15:30.520 --> 01:15:34.520]  This is a hearing based on violation of probation.
[01:15:34.520 --> 01:15:35.520]  Right.
[01:15:35.520 --> 01:15:36.520]  Okay.
[01:15:36.520 --> 01:15:44.520]  Well, it's not going to involve a jury, it's not going to involve anything other than an administrative process for the most part,
[01:15:44.520 --> 01:15:49.520]  and that's all because of the agreement you signed for the probation.
[01:15:49.520 --> 01:15:57.520]  All this takes is for them to show whatever they consider to be the proper evidence and the judge to say revoked.
[01:15:57.520 --> 01:16:02.520]  So why are they trying to revoke it is one thing you need to know.
[01:16:02.520 --> 01:16:08.520]  How do they intend to prove the accusation in order to get it revoked?
[01:16:08.520 --> 01:16:10.520]  What's the basis for it?
[01:16:10.520 --> 01:16:13.520]  That's the things you need to know.
[01:16:13.520 --> 01:16:16.520]  Are you going in there with or without an attorney?
[01:16:16.520 --> 01:16:17.520]  Without.
[01:16:17.520 --> 01:16:21.520]  Then you better know what the heck's going on when you do.
[01:16:21.520 --> 01:16:22.520]  Okay.
[01:16:22.520 --> 01:16:28.520]  Well, there's a case that I'm having, you know, I'm appealing in the Supreme Court right now.
[01:16:28.520 --> 01:16:30.520]  You're appealing the conviction.
[01:16:30.520 --> 01:16:31.520]  Yes.
[01:16:31.520 --> 01:16:32.520]  Okay.
[01:16:32.520 --> 01:16:36.520]  The conviction is still good until they rule on it.
[01:16:36.520 --> 01:16:40.520]  Therefore, the probation agreement is good until they rule on it.
[01:16:40.520 --> 01:16:44.520]  Hang on just a second, Jim, and we'll pick this up on the other side, okay?
[01:16:44.520 --> 01:16:45.520]  All right.
[01:16:45.520 --> 01:16:51.520]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:51.520 --> 01:16:52.520]  Y'all hang in there.
[01:16:52.520 --> 01:17:02.520]  We will be right back.
[01:17:22.520 --> 01:17:41.520]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:41.520 --> 01:17:55.520]  We'll be right back.
[01:18:11.520 --> 01:18:17.520]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.520 --> 01:18:22.520]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:18:22.520 --> 01:18:25.520]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.520 --> 01:18:31.520]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.520 --> 01:18:36.520]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much we became a marketing distributor
[01:18:36.520 --> 01:18:40.520]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:40.520 --> 01:18:43.520]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[01:18:43.520 --> 01:18:48.520]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:48.520 --> 01:18:52.520]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:18:52.520 --> 01:18:55.520]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:18:55.520 --> 01:18:59.520]  help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:59.520 --> 01:19:15.520]  Order now.
[01:19:15.520 --> 01:19:44.520]  Thank you.
[01:19:44.520 --> 01:19:46.520]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:46.520 --> 01:19:50.520]  This is Rules Law Radio, and we are talking with Jimmy in Maryland.
[01:19:50.520 --> 01:19:53.520]  All right, Jimmy.
[01:19:53.520 --> 01:19:54.520]  Okay.
[01:19:54.520 --> 01:19:57.520]  You know, I had a case where I was convicted.
[01:19:57.520 --> 01:19:58.520]  I'm appealing it.
[01:19:58.520 --> 01:20:00.520]  I did a motion for stay.
[01:20:00.520 --> 01:20:03.520]  And this is about a year ago I called you.
[01:20:03.520 --> 01:20:05.520]  I told you that I was in the parking lot of the courthouse,
[01:20:05.520 --> 01:20:09.520]  where the officer lay wait for me and then cited me again.
[01:20:09.520 --> 01:20:13.520]  And that's what the valid probation was the same day I was convicted that I'm now appealing.
[01:20:13.520 --> 01:20:17.520]  But now they're going for more money with this probation violation,
[01:20:17.520 --> 01:20:19.520]  probation thing.
[01:20:19.520 --> 01:20:20.520]  Right.
[01:20:20.520 --> 01:20:24.520]  So I just was just trying to get an understanding exactly.
[01:20:24.520 --> 01:20:28.520]  But I was just going to point in and say, hey, the cases, this case is still pending.
[01:20:28.520 --> 01:20:30.520]  I did a motion for stay.
[01:20:30.520 --> 01:20:38.520]  And, you know, the Supreme Court hasn't ruled yet.
[01:20:38.520 --> 01:20:42.520]  Well, like I say, then you can move to have it continued or whatever.
[01:20:42.520 --> 01:20:46.520]  I don't know exactly what the process is up there in Maryland for doing that.
[01:20:46.520 --> 01:20:50.520]  But, yeah, you need to find out everything you can.
[01:20:50.520 --> 01:20:52.520]  And if at all possible,
[01:20:52.520 --> 01:20:58.520]  ask them for a public defender to go in there with you if you think you need one.
[01:20:58.520 --> 01:21:01.520]  Okay.
[01:21:01.520 --> 01:21:02.520]  Okay.
[01:21:02.520 --> 01:21:04.520]  So that's basically what I was just going to say.
[01:21:04.520 --> 01:21:09.520]  As you say, just ask for a continue because the court has not ruled yet.
[01:21:09.520 --> 01:21:12.520]  Yeah, you can say, look, this is under appeal right now.
[01:21:12.520 --> 01:21:15.520]  So.
[01:21:15.520 --> 01:21:18.520]  Okay.
[01:21:18.520 --> 01:21:19.520]  Okay.
[01:21:19.520 --> 01:21:20.520]  So that's what I do.
[01:21:20.520 --> 01:21:21.520]  That's what I do.
[01:21:21.520 --> 01:21:22.520]  All right.
[01:21:22.520 --> 01:21:23.520]  Well, good luck, man.
[01:21:23.520 --> 01:21:24.520]  Okay.
[01:21:24.520 --> 01:21:25.520]  Thanks a lot and appreciate it, man.
[01:21:25.520 --> 01:21:26.520]  You're welcome.
[01:21:26.520 --> 01:21:27.520]  All right.
[01:21:27.520 --> 01:21:28.520]  Bye-bye.
[01:21:28.520 --> 01:21:29.520]  All right.
[01:21:29.520 --> 01:21:31.520]  Now we're going to go to Patrick in Texas.
[01:21:31.520 --> 01:21:34.520]  Patrick, what can we do for you?
[01:21:34.520 --> 01:21:35.520]  Hey, Eric.
[01:21:35.520 --> 01:21:36.520]  Good evening.
[01:21:36.520 --> 01:21:37.520]  I'm doing good.
[01:21:37.520 --> 01:21:38.520]  And you?
[01:21:38.520 --> 01:21:39.520]  Not too bad, sir.
[01:21:39.520 --> 01:21:40.520]  Thank you.
[01:21:40.520 --> 01:21:44.520]  I was calling in reference to Texas traffic citation.
[01:21:44.520 --> 01:21:45.520]  Okay.
[01:21:45.520 --> 01:21:47.520]  And it's in my list to do this, get to your course.
[01:21:47.520 --> 01:21:48.520]  And I haven't done it.
[01:21:48.520 --> 01:21:50.520]  So I know I've heard this before on the radio time and time again.
[01:21:50.520 --> 01:21:52.520]  But now, hello.
[01:21:52.520 --> 01:21:57.520]  So I want to check with you and see when the next course is, number one.
[01:21:57.520 --> 01:22:04.520]  And number two, what my alternatives are in reference to the situation at hand.
[01:22:04.520 --> 01:22:05.520]  Okay.
[01:22:05.520 --> 01:22:09.520]  The courses are every Sunday from 2 to 5.
[01:22:09.520 --> 01:22:10.520]  Okay.
[01:22:10.520 --> 01:22:11.520]  The location?
[01:22:11.520 --> 01:22:15.520]  Brave New Books, 1904 Guadalupe Street, Austin, Texas.
[01:22:15.520 --> 01:22:16.520]  Sunday, 2 to 5.
[01:22:16.520 --> 01:22:18.520]  I'll see you then, for sure.
[01:22:18.520 --> 01:22:19.520]  Okay.
[01:22:19.520 --> 01:22:20.520]  Okay.
[01:22:20.520 --> 01:22:25.520]  Traveling with myself, wife, new baby.
[01:22:25.520 --> 01:22:31.520]  And using cruise control, I had a bet on 72, 74.
[01:22:31.520 --> 01:22:37.520]  The individual cited me saying I was doing 81 on a calibrated radar, quote unquote.
[01:22:37.520 --> 01:22:41.520]  And also on the ticket stated there were no passengers in the vehicle.
[01:22:41.520 --> 01:22:49.520]  And I need to appear before a J.P. in reference to this before, I think, the 6th or 3rd of March.
[01:22:49.520 --> 01:22:51.520]  Okay.
[01:22:51.520 --> 01:22:55.520]  When the individual came up to the vehicle and it said...
[01:22:55.520 --> 01:22:56.520]  Whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:22:56.520 --> 01:22:57.520]  I'm sorry.
[01:22:57.520 --> 01:22:58.520]  Back up here.
[01:22:58.520 --> 01:23:00.520]  When the individual came up to what?
[01:23:00.520 --> 01:23:08.520]  When the individual came up to the personal conveyance, he stated, give me your driver's license.
[01:23:08.520 --> 01:23:11.520]  I kind of looked at him and I said, pardon me?
[01:23:11.520 --> 01:23:13.520]  He said, I need your driver's license.
[01:23:13.520 --> 01:23:16.520]  I said, what's the issue here?
[01:23:16.520 --> 01:23:19.520]  He was like, give me your driver's license.
[01:23:19.520 --> 01:23:24.520]  And I was thinking to myself, usually if someone inquires about why they're pulling someone over,
[01:23:24.520 --> 01:23:29.520]  is there a statutory requirement for them to announce why they're pulling you over or am I off on time?
[01:23:29.520 --> 01:23:34.520]  He needs to state his articulable probable cause, yeah.
[01:23:34.520 --> 01:23:35.520]  He refused to.
[01:23:35.520 --> 01:23:36.520]  My wife was sitting in there.
[01:23:36.520 --> 01:23:44.520]  She tapped me on the shoulder because I'm ready to incite myself and say, I need to know why you want to see a driver's license.
[01:23:44.520 --> 01:23:51.520]  Because number one, I'm not in commercial commerce, but I didn't get off because I had the baby and had her.
[01:23:51.520 --> 01:23:53.520]  And I said, okay.
[01:23:53.520 --> 01:23:55.520]  So he took it.
[01:23:55.520 --> 01:23:59.520]  And he said, then he stated the reason I pulled you over, he said, I'll say it's your insurance.
[01:23:59.520 --> 01:24:01.520]  I said, okay.
[01:24:01.520 --> 01:24:03.520]  And provided that document to him.
[01:24:03.520 --> 01:24:04.520]  I didn't say anything else.
[01:24:04.520 --> 01:24:14.520]  And he said, the reason I pulled you over was because unless you were going 81 miles an hour.
[01:24:14.520 --> 01:24:21.520]  I said, that's impossible because I had my cruise control on and it was set between 72 and 74.
[01:24:21.520 --> 01:24:28.520]  And unless there's something wrong with this pedometer, which there is actually, it's impossible.
[01:24:28.520 --> 01:24:29.520]  He said, just stay here.
[01:24:29.520 --> 01:24:30.520]  I'll be back.
[01:24:30.520 --> 01:24:31.520]  I said, okay.
[01:24:31.520 --> 01:24:33.520]  Well, do you want me to pull my insurance up on my phone?
[01:24:33.520 --> 01:24:37.520]  Because the insurance had expired the day before and had printed the card out.
[01:24:37.520 --> 01:24:38.520]  He said, no.
[01:24:38.520 --> 01:24:40.520]  I said, okay.
[01:24:40.520 --> 01:24:45.520]  And then he went back to his vehicle, obviously entered in data and came back up.
[01:24:45.520 --> 01:24:48.520]  He said, you'll need to pay every four phones up for this date.
[01:24:48.520 --> 01:24:51.520]  Do you understand this?
[01:24:51.520 --> 01:24:53.520]  I hear what he said.
[01:24:53.520 --> 01:24:55.520]  And this is not a mission appeal.
[01:24:55.520 --> 01:24:57.520]  He signed here just saying that you will show up.
[01:24:57.520 --> 01:25:01.520]  And I said, that's the only thing I'm signing for.
[01:25:01.520 --> 01:25:03.520]  Okay.
[01:25:03.520 --> 01:25:09.520]  And so obviously, he noted on their passengers in the vehicle, no.
[01:25:09.520 --> 01:25:12.520]  I don't know if that's a critical thing or not.
[01:25:12.520 --> 01:25:16.520]  Well, that depends on what the definition of passenger is, huh?
[01:25:16.520 --> 01:25:18.520]  Well, you're right.
[01:25:18.520 --> 01:25:19.520]  Yeah, she wasn't paying me.
[01:25:19.520 --> 01:25:25.520]  And so there was a third-party witness present.
[01:25:25.520 --> 01:25:28.520]  I don't think they have a spot for that on the ticket.
[01:25:28.520 --> 01:25:29.520]  No, I agree with that.
[01:25:29.520 --> 01:25:32.520]  What agency issued it?
[01:25:32.520 --> 01:25:35.520]  The Gonzales Sheriff's Department.
[01:25:35.520 --> 01:25:36.520]  Okay.
[01:25:36.520 --> 01:25:40.520]  Gonzales County Sheriff's Office public.
[01:25:40.520 --> 01:25:41.520]  All right.
[01:25:41.520 --> 01:25:49.520]  Gonzales County was to appear before a JP judge at JP1 in Gonzales, Texas.
[01:25:49.520 --> 01:25:53.520]  Well, too bad you wasn't in class weekend before last,
[01:25:53.520 --> 01:25:55.520]  when we were actually doing a speeding allegation
[01:25:55.520 --> 01:26:01.520]  and showing you how to take it apart piece by piece.
[01:26:01.520 --> 01:26:02.520]  Okay.
[01:26:02.520 --> 01:26:06.520]  But we do have the video of the class if you want it.
[01:26:06.520 --> 01:26:08.520]  Okay, I do.
[01:26:08.520 --> 01:26:14.520]  Am I too far behind this now to do anything to fight it?
[01:26:14.520 --> 01:26:15.520]  No, you can fight it.
[01:26:15.520 --> 01:26:20.520]  Texas does not have fixed speed limits, despite what they want you to believe.
[01:26:20.520 --> 01:26:23.520]  Okay.
[01:26:23.520 --> 01:26:30.520]  Okay, so the allegation in and of itself just doesn't work.
[01:26:30.520 --> 01:26:32.520]  They have a problem with it, big time.
[01:26:32.520 --> 01:26:40.520]  And the script I wrote for dealing with that shows it.
[01:26:40.520 --> 01:26:41.520]  I did write down the script.
[01:26:41.520 --> 01:26:42.520]  I didn't have it with me.
[01:26:42.520 --> 01:26:44.520]  No, no, no, not the transportation script,
[01:26:44.520 --> 01:26:48.520]  the one for challenging a speeding charging court.
[01:26:48.520 --> 01:26:51.520]  Okay.
[01:26:51.520 --> 01:26:55.520]  Well, should I do something prior to that or wait until Sunday?
[01:26:55.520 --> 01:26:58.520]  Well, the only way for you to get the video is to bring something
[01:26:58.520 --> 01:27:04.520]  that's got at least 32 gigs of free space on it so that I can copy the video to it.
[01:27:04.520 --> 01:27:05.520]  But that video is 20 bucks.
[01:27:05.520 --> 01:27:10.520]  We sell the class videos for 20 bucks if you're not in attendance.
[01:27:10.520 --> 01:27:11.520]  Not a problem.
[01:27:11.520 --> 01:27:15.520]  I want to be in attendance because I definitely – I recommend to anyone out there,
[01:27:15.520 --> 01:27:16.520]  get ahead of it, not behind it,
[01:27:16.520 --> 01:27:21.520]  because this has been on my to-do list for probably over 12 months now.
[01:27:21.520 --> 01:27:22.520]  Whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:27:22.520 --> 01:27:25.520]  You mean the class or the ticket?
[01:27:25.520 --> 01:27:26.520]  No, no, the class.
[01:27:26.520 --> 01:27:28.520]  Okay.
[01:27:28.520 --> 01:27:31.520]  Well, I was kind of inviting the ticket after I heard you because I'm like,
[01:27:31.520 --> 01:27:32.520]  okay, let's go ahead.
[01:27:32.520 --> 01:27:33.520]  Let's play this game.
[01:27:33.520 --> 01:27:35.520]  But, you know, that's just more time and more effort.
[01:27:35.520 --> 01:27:39.520]  With a baby, you don't really have that option at this point.
[01:27:39.520 --> 01:27:42.520]  But I'm rather confident in your skills,
[01:27:42.520 --> 01:27:47.520]  and I understand that you've got a wealth of knowledge and I respect that,
[01:27:47.520 --> 01:27:50.520]  and I appreciate what you do on a day-to-day basis.
[01:27:50.520 --> 01:27:54.520]  And I really – like I said, I'm kicking myself in the butt.
[01:27:54.520 --> 01:27:56.520]  Don't let anyone else out there listen and do this.
[01:27:56.520 --> 01:28:00.520]  Be at that class on Sunday or next Sunday or the next one after that.
[01:28:00.520 --> 01:28:03.520]  This is – this is – this is hindsight.
[01:28:03.520 --> 01:28:06.520]  Like I said, you're kicking yourself in the butt because you didn't go ahead of time,
[01:28:06.520 --> 01:28:08.520]  and I guarantee I could have handled it different,
[01:28:08.520 --> 01:28:10.520]  depending on how the wife would have allowed me to.
[01:28:10.520 --> 01:28:12.520]  But if I was alone, it would have been a different ballgame.
[01:28:12.520 --> 01:28:17.520]  I would have been demanding – I refused to show my license in the first place,
[01:28:17.520 --> 01:28:20.520]  and, too, I'd demand to see the GP right then, right there.
[01:28:20.520 --> 01:28:23.520]  So I don't know if that's been a right course of action or not,
[01:28:23.520 --> 01:28:28.520]  but that's what was in my mind from what I remembered from what I'd heard on the radio with you.
[01:28:28.520 --> 01:28:29.520]  Yeah.
[01:28:29.520 --> 01:28:32.520]  Well, like I say, you're welcome to try anything,
[01:28:32.520 --> 01:28:36.520]  but I don't recommend deviating from the script at all
[01:28:36.520 --> 01:28:41.520]  because once you walk off the edge of that cliff, it's real hard to get back up there.
[01:28:41.520 --> 01:28:43.520]  I understand.
[01:28:43.520 --> 01:28:44.520]  All right.
[01:28:44.520 --> 01:28:48.520]  So that being said, yeah, show up in class on Sunday.
[01:28:48.520 --> 01:28:50.520]  Bring at least a 32-gig flash drive,
[01:28:50.520 --> 01:28:57.520]  and I'll make sure that we get to the video of the weekend before last when we did the speeding charge.
[01:28:57.520 --> 01:28:58.520]  Okay.
[01:28:58.520 --> 01:29:03.520]  Do I need to do anything with this in reference to response prior to that, even if it says I haven't?
[01:29:03.520 --> 01:29:07.520]  When is – you said you didn't have to be in there until March when?
[01:29:07.520 --> 01:29:09.520]  March 6th.
[01:29:09.520 --> 01:29:10.520]  Okay.
[01:29:10.520 --> 01:29:19.520]  Well, the 6th is the Friday after Sunday, so I would go in after you've got some information under your belt
[01:29:19.520 --> 01:29:21.520]  rather than before.
[01:29:21.520 --> 01:29:22.520]  Okay.
[01:29:22.520 --> 01:29:24.520]  So nothing – no response whatsoever?
[01:29:24.520 --> 01:29:31.520]  Well, you have up until the day of, so there's nothing that you have to do until then.
[01:29:31.520 --> 01:29:32.520]  Okay.
[01:29:32.520 --> 01:29:33.520]  Okay.
[01:29:33.520 --> 01:29:34.520]  That sounds perfect.
[01:29:34.520 --> 01:29:36.520]  Well, I look forward to seeing you Sunday.
[01:29:36.520 --> 01:29:37.520]  All right.
[01:29:37.520 --> 01:29:38.520]  Good luck.
[01:29:38.520 --> 01:29:39.520]  Thank you, sir.
[01:29:39.520 --> 01:29:40.520]  Yes, sir.
[01:29:40.520 --> 01:29:41.520]  All right, folks.
[01:29:41.520 --> 01:29:46.520]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:46.520 --> 01:29:49.520]  I got two or three more callers up on the board here to get to,
[01:29:49.520 --> 01:29:52.520]  and I'm going to try to get to everybody before we run out of time.
[01:29:52.520 --> 01:29:53.520]  So y'all hang in there.
[01:29:53.520 --> 01:30:00.520]  We will be right back.
[01:30:00.520 --> 01:30:04.520]  Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn was sentenced to eight years' hard labor
[01:30:04.520 --> 01:30:06.520]  for criticizing Stalin in a letter to a friend.
[01:30:06.520 --> 01:30:09.520]  Good thing those days are past, or are they?
[01:30:09.520 --> 01:30:10.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:30:10.520 --> 01:30:12.520]  More in a moment.
[01:30:12.520 --> 01:30:16.520]  Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for
[01:30:16.520 --> 01:30:19.520]  and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:19.520 --> 01:30:20.520]  That's creepy.
[01:30:20.520 --> 01:30:22.520]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:22.520 --> 01:30:25.520]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:25.520 --> 01:30:28.520]  Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address,
[01:30:28.520 --> 01:30:30.520]  make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies,
[01:30:30.520 --> 01:30:32.520]  and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:32.520 --> 01:30:36.520]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:36.520 --> 01:30:39.520]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:39.520 --> 01:30:42.520]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.520 --> 01:30:46.520]  Back in the bad old Soviet days, officials routinely opened people's letters
[01:30:46.520 --> 01:30:49.520]  and scanned them for political correctness.
[01:30:49.520 --> 01:30:52.520]  Today, the government of Finland is opening and scanning people's letters
[01:30:52.520 --> 01:30:56.520]  for a different reason, to deliver their mail electronically.
[01:30:56.520 --> 01:30:59.520]  Hundreds of Finnish citizens are letting postal workers open their mail
[01:30:59.520 --> 01:31:03.520]  and scan each letter and bill into a computer file they can see online
[01:31:03.520 --> 01:31:04.520]  or receive by email.
[01:31:04.520 --> 01:31:07.520]  They hope the idea eventually goes viral.
[01:31:07.520 --> 01:31:10.520]  Postal officials promise the staff is sworn to secrecy
[01:31:10.520 --> 01:31:12.520]  and would never read the contents of the letters.
[01:31:12.520 --> 01:31:14.520]  Somehow, if you were alive today,
[01:31:14.520 --> 01:31:18.520]  I doubt Alexander Solzhenitsyn would be among the first to sign up.
[01:31:18.520 --> 01:31:20.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:20.520 --> 01:31:31.520]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.520 --> 01:31:36.520]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.520 --> 01:31:38.520]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.520 --> 01:31:43.520]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.520 --> 01:31:46.520]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.520 --> 01:31:49.520]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.520 --> 01:31:50.520]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.520 --> 01:31:51.520]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.520 --> 01:31:53.520]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.520 --> 01:31:54.520]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.520 --> 01:31:55.520]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.520 --> 01:31:58.520]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.520 --> 01:32:01.520]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.520 --> 01:32:06.520]  At HempUSA.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world,
[01:32:06.520 --> 01:32:10.520]  detoxifying, self-healing, while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:32:10.520 --> 01:32:16.520]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest selling product, Micro Plant Powder.
[01:32:16.520 --> 01:32:21.520]  Our Micro Plant Powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc, and silica
[01:32:21.520 --> 01:32:25.520]  to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:32:25.520 --> 01:32:28.520]  Micro Plant Powder is excellent for daily intake
[01:32:28.520 --> 01:32:30.520]  and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:32:30.520 --> 01:32:34.520]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at HempUSA.org.
[01:32:34.520 --> 01:32:38.520]  And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:32:38.520 --> 01:32:43.520]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:32:43.520 --> 01:32:47.520]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:32:47.520 --> 01:32:53.520]  Please visit us at HempUSA.org or call 908-691-2608.
[01:32:53.520 --> 01:32:56.520]  That's 908-691-2608.
[01:32:56.520 --> 01:32:59.520]  See what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:32:59.520 --> 01:33:04.520]  at HempUSA.org.
[01:33:04.520 --> 01:33:07.520]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network
[01:33:07.520 --> 01:33:12.520]  at LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:12.520 --> 01:33:39.520]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:33:39.520 --> 01:33:41.520]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:41.520 --> 01:33:46.520]  Alright, we are now in the bottom of the hour here
[01:33:46.520 --> 01:33:49.520]  and we are going to take Richard in Louisiana.
[01:33:49.520 --> 01:33:51.520]  Richard, what do you got?
[01:33:51.520 --> 01:33:53.520]  Good evening, Eddie.
[01:33:53.520 --> 01:33:57.520]  Over the last week, I was listening to some other people
[01:33:57.520 --> 01:34:02.520]  in regard to the right to travel and I came across a phrase
[01:34:02.520 --> 01:34:04.520]  that I hope you might be able to help me understand.
[01:34:04.520 --> 01:34:11.520]  And the guy used the term open as a matter of right to public vehicular travel.
[01:34:11.520 --> 01:34:17.520]  Open to public vehicular travel as a matter of right.
[01:34:17.520 --> 01:34:19.520]  Yes.
[01:34:19.520 --> 01:34:24.520]  And he cites a Texas statute, Natural Resources Code.
[01:34:24.520 --> 01:34:26.520]  The Natural Resources Code.
[01:34:26.520 --> 01:34:31.520]  That's the only code in Texas where that specific phrase appears still.
[01:34:31.520 --> 01:34:34.520]  Right, and he claims that with that particular statute,
[01:34:34.520 --> 01:34:40.520]  you could build your case for travel, unencumbered travel,
[01:34:40.520 --> 01:34:43.520]  without regulations or licensing.
[01:34:43.520 --> 01:34:46.520]  Could you tell me about that or the audience?
[01:34:46.520 --> 01:34:52.520]  I can tell you that the guy is probably dead wrong
[01:34:52.520 --> 01:35:00.520]  because I don't have a context in which he plans to build that case.
[01:35:00.520 --> 01:35:04.520]  If he thinks that he's going to use that statute as a defense
[01:35:04.520 --> 01:35:10.520]  against a commercial citation, he's wrong.
[01:35:10.520 --> 01:35:13.520]  Now, he may be able to use it in a lawsuit,
[01:35:13.520 --> 01:35:18.520]  but I doubt it's going to carry any weight whatsoever as to make the assertion
[01:35:18.520 --> 01:35:23.520]  that the transportation code doesn't mean what it says.
[01:35:23.520 --> 01:35:31.520]  The issue there is the commercial nexus argument versus the right to use the roads.
[01:35:31.520 --> 01:35:34.520]  The state can't prove a commercial nexus,
[01:35:34.520 --> 01:35:36.520]  but it also cannot prove that it owns the road
[01:35:36.520 --> 01:35:41.520]  and the people have no right to use them because that's simply not true.
[01:35:41.520 --> 01:35:44.520]  So the context determines whether or not you're going to be able to use it.
[01:35:44.520 --> 01:35:48.520]  You cannot use it as a defense against the citation.
[01:35:48.520 --> 01:35:51.520]  You cannot argue I have the right to travel
[01:35:51.520 --> 01:35:56.520]  against an allegation that you broke one of the commercial rules.
[01:35:56.520 --> 01:35:58.520]  And I can tell you why.
[01:35:58.520 --> 01:36:02.520]  A truck driver has a right to travel, doesn't he?
[01:36:02.520 --> 01:36:03.520]  Yes.
[01:36:03.520 --> 01:36:06.520]  But when he's behind the wheel of that truck getting paid,
[01:36:06.520 --> 01:36:09.520]  he's not exercising the right to travel, is he?
[01:36:09.520 --> 01:36:10.520]  No, he isn't.
[01:36:10.520 --> 01:36:14.520]  He's exercising commercial privilege, isn't he?
[01:36:14.520 --> 01:36:16.520]  That is correct.
[01:36:16.520 --> 01:36:20.520]  That is exactly what they're asserting you are doing when they write you a ticket.
[01:36:20.520 --> 01:36:25.520]  Therefore, I have a right to travel is not a proper response
[01:36:25.520 --> 01:36:31.520]  to you commercially violated the rules.
[01:36:31.520 --> 01:36:35.520]  A little clearer.
[01:36:35.520 --> 01:36:40.520]  The argument is I was never engaged in transportation
[01:36:40.520 --> 01:36:45.520]  for the purpose of forming the commercial nexus.
[01:36:45.520 --> 01:36:51.520]  Yes, because what struck me as curious after listening to you for a while
[01:36:51.520 --> 01:36:54.520]  is the phrasing in here.
[01:36:54.520 --> 01:36:58.520]  The public highway used the public as a matter of right
[01:36:58.520 --> 01:37:01.520]  for the purpose of vehicular travel.
[01:37:01.520 --> 01:37:06.520]  Now, if a vehicle is a regulated form of transportation,
[01:37:06.520 --> 01:37:08.520]  then there is no right.
[01:37:08.520 --> 01:37:12.520]  So it sort of contradicts itself in the wording.
[01:37:12.520 --> 01:37:15.520]  Not necessarily.
[01:37:15.520 --> 01:37:19.520]  You have to remember that opinions do not always take into consideration
[01:37:19.520 --> 01:37:26.520]  the legal semantics of definitions when it's describing certain decisions.
[01:37:26.520 --> 01:37:30.520]  In what they call the dicta and the discussion,
[01:37:30.520 --> 01:37:34.520]  it may or may not be using the legalese terminology.
[01:37:34.520 --> 01:37:39.520]  It may be using the common English terminology.
[01:37:39.520 --> 01:37:44.520]  Yeah, well, that's as I cited in this Natural Resources Code.
[01:37:44.520 --> 01:37:46.520]  Well, Eddie, thank you.
[01:37:46.520 --> 01:37:48.520]  I appreciate you giving me the time.
[01:37:48.520 --> 01:37:54.520]  And I like to listen to a lot of opinions and then try and sort it out.
[01:37:54.520 --> 01:37:58.520]  And you've been a great help in my quest for the truth.
[01:37:58.520 --> 01:37:59.520]  Well, I appreciate that.
[01:37:59.520 --> 01:38:01.520]  And like I say, I do the same thing.
[01:38:01.520 --> 01:38:03.520]  I don't ever trust one source.
[01:38:03.520 --> 01:38:08.520]  That's why I developed the AQE rule way back when I started doing this.
[01:38:08.520 --> 01:38:11.520]  The AQE rule, folks, is very, very simple.
[01:38:11.520 --> 01:38:15.520]  Always question everything.
[01:38:15.520 --> 01:38:19.520]  No matter what the source, question it anyway.
[01:38:19.520 --> 01:38:26.520]  Find multiple sources that agree and then find multiple sources that disagree.
[01:38:26.520 --> 01:38:33.520]  And then see which one or ones coincide with your proper understanding
[01:38:33.520 --> 01:38:38.520]  of what individual right is and how our rights were meant to be effective.
[01:38:38.520 --> 01:38:45.520]  And then that's the opinion you stick with.
[01:38:45.520 --> 01:38:46.520]  All right.
[01:38:46.520 --> 01:38:47.520]  Okay.
[01:38:47.520 --> 01:38:50.520]  Well, I had several people up and drop off the board here.
[01:38:50.520 --> 01:38:53.520]  It looks like leaving me with the last one that I had in line down here,
[01:38:53.520 --> 01:38:55.520]  which is Truth Raider.
[01:38:55.520 --> 01:38:57.520]  All right, Raider, what do you got?
[01:38:57.520 --> 01:38:58.520]  Good evening, Eddie.
[01:38:58.520 --> 01:39:00.520]  Can you hear me loud and clear?
[01:39:00.520 --> 01:39:02.520]  While you're talking, I can.
[01:39:02.520 --> 01:39:04.520]  Yeah, because I'm having a little bit of difficulty hearing you.
[01:39:04.520 --> 01:39:07.520]  You're breaking up a little bit, although the players do.
[01:39:07.520 --> 01:39:09.520]  Okay, the media player is excellent.
[01:39:09.520 --> 01:39:12.520]  Just want to let you know that the media player is functioning very well,
[01:39:12.520 --> 01:39:13.520]  so there's no problem.
[01:39:13.520 --> 01:39:14.520]  So that's good news.
[01:39:14.520 --> 01:39:16.520]  Okay.
[01:39:16.520 --> 01:39:17.520]  I have a question.
[01:39:17.520 --> 01:39:19.520]  I'm planning on traveling down to Southern California.
[01:39:19.520 --> 01:39:22.520]  I'm going to take a plane about around October.
[01:39:22.520 --> 01:39:27.520]  I have to take care of some issues with my little stepmom.
[01:39:27.520 --> 01:39:32.520]  She's about 96 years old, and she has some property issues.
[01:39:32.520 --> 01:39:35.520]  Unfortunately, her house that she has in the high desert down there
[01:39:35.520 --> 01:39:38.520]  in Southern California, somebody went in there
[01:39:38.520 --> 01:39:42.520]  and they cleaned out all of her belongings, all of her valuables.
[01:39:42.520 --> 01:39:46.520]  So I need to go down there and help her in the recovery of what she can sort out
[01:39:46.520 --> 01:39:49.520]  and what she can get out of there.
[01:39:49.520 --> 01:39:56.520]  My question is, since now, I no longer have an active Oregon driver's license,
[01:39:56.520 --> 01:40:00.520]  and since I'm not a driver anyway, but I still have my old California license,
[01:40:00.520 --> 01:40:06.520]  and that supposedly doesn't expire until my birthday in 2016.
[01:40:06.520 --> 01:40:10.520]  When I go down to California, am I going to encounter a problem
[01:40:10.520 --> 01:40:19.520]  if I try to rent an automobile from any particular or any at all rental car agency?
[01:40:19.520 --> 01:40:22.520]  I don't see why you would,
[01:40:22.520 --> 01:40:26.520]  but the problem that I can see that you've run afoul of now
[01:40:26.520 --> 01:40:29.520]  is possessing two licenses in two different states.
[01:40:29.520 --> 01:40:34.520]  Now, that of course also goes along with the issue of whether or not
[01:40:34.520 --> 01:40:38.520]  the two states involved are members of the driver's license compact,
[01:40:38.520 --> 01:40:40.520]  which California is.
[01:40:40.520 --> 01:40:45.520]  I don't know about Oregon.
[01:40:45.520 --> 01:40:50.520]  But again, that's only going to be a problem if someone else comes up and says,
[01:40:50.520 --> 01:40:52.520]  hey, this guy's got two licenses.
[01:40:52.520 --> 01:40:57.520]  The rental agency's not likely to do that.
[01:40:57.520 --> 01:41:00.520]  Well, I don't have a physical Oregon driver's license.
[01:41:00.520 --> 01:41:02.520]  I haven't had it for many, many, many years.
[01:41:02.520 --> 01:41:07.520]  I applied, and then I didn't ask all the questions on the test,
[01:41:07.520 --> 01:41:10.520]  and I just never bothered to go in and take it again in order to get the physical.
[01:41:10.520 --> 01:41:13.520]  Then I fail to understand the purpose of your question.
[01:41:13.520 --> 01:41:17.520]  The purpose should obviously be no, if you're using the California license,
[01:41:17.520 --> 01:41:22.520]  why would you have a problem renting a car?
[01:41:22.520 --> 01:41:25.520]  I'm just wondering if, I don't know if it's suspended or not,
[01:41:25.520 --> 01:41:28.520]  because they have the same deal they have going on in California
[01:41:28.520 --> 01:41:31.520]  as they do in almost all states.
[01:41:31.520 --> 01:41:35.520]  You have to continuously show that you have auto insurance
[01:41:35.520 --> 01:41:39.520]  in order to keep your license active.
[01:41:39.520 --> 01:41:45.520]  Only if you've got a car registered in that state.
[01:41:45.520 --> 01:41:48.520]  I don't have it no longer registered in that state, no.
[01:41:48.520 --> 01:41:51.520]  Then that wouldn't apply.
[01:41:51.520 --> 01:41:52.520]  Okay.
[01:41:52.520 --> 01:41:57.520]  So I could show them a photo ID that I have from Oregon, and that would suffice?
[01:41:57.520 --> 01:42:01.520]  No, it won't, because the rental agencies are controlled by a statute
[01:42:01.520 --> 01:42:08.520]  that says you will not rent to anyone that does not have a valid driver's license.
[01:42:08.520 --> 01:42:10.520]  Okay.
[01:42:10.520 --> 01:42:12.520]  Okay, so I don't know the statuses of it.
[01:42:12.520 --> 01:42:14.520]  I've never received anything back from the DMV.
[01:42:14.520 --> 01:42:18.520]  I don't know if they will be able to determine what the status of it is or not.
[01:42:18.520 --> 01:42:20.520]  They're going to look at the date on it,
[01:42:20.520 --> 01:42:23.520]  whether or not their computer can actually check and see if it's valid.
[01:42:23.520 --> 01:42:25.520]  I don't know.
[01:42:25.520 --> 01:42:27.520]  Okay.
[01:42:27.520 --> 01:42:31.520]  So I could run more than likely I'm going to run into some type of red tape trying to...
[01:42:31.520 --> 01:42:33.520]  Again, I didn't say that.
[01:42:33.520 --> 01:42:36.520]  I don't know.
[01:42:36.520 --> 01:42:38.520]  Okay.
[01:42:38.520 --> 01:42:41.520]  Then I need to start calling around and checking with them, and...
[01:42:41.520 --> 01:42:43.520]  Probably wouldn't hurt.
[01:42:43.520 --> 01:42:45.520]  Yeah, I need to do that.
[01:42:45.520 --> 01:42:48.520]  Okay, well, I'll have to address that at a later time before I go down there,
[01:42:48.520 --> 01:42:51.520]  but I wanted to find out if you knew anything about that.
[01:42:51.520 --> 01:42:53.520]  All right, now the second question I have,
[01:42:53.520 --> 01:42:57.520]  and I'll jump to let you get to other callers that might be coming onto the line right now,
[01:42:57.520 --> 01:43:04.520]  is what is our rights concerning geoengineering as people here on the ground
[01:43:04.520 --> 01:43:07.520]  that are being sprayed from the air?
[01:43:07.520 --> 01:43:13.520]  What is their particular rights to doing this,
[01:43:13.520 --> 01:43:16.520]  and what can we do as a people to fight against it?
[01:43:16.520 --> 01:43:18.520]  What do we need to do?
[01:43:18.520 --> 01:43:21.520]  Well, first off, they have no right to do it at all.
[01:43:21.520 --> 01:43:25.520]  No one has the right to poison a population
[01:43:25.520 --> 01:43:28.520]  or to alter the conditions under which that population lives
[01:43:28.520 --> 01:43:32.520]  without that population's knowledge and consent.
[01:43:32.520 --> 01:43:36.520]  And government was never given rights.
[01:43:36.520 --> 01:43:39.520]  They were given delegated powers and authorities.
[01:43:39.520 --> 01:43:42.520]  That's a far cry from rights.
[01:43:42.520 --> 01:43:44.520]  Okay?
[01:43:44.520 --> 01:43:46.520]  Anything else?
[01:43:46.520 --> 01:43:49.520]  No, I just want to know what can I do? What can I do, actually?
[01:43:49.520 --> 01:43:52.520]  Okay, well, hang on, and I'll finish this up on the other side.
[01:43:52.520 --> 01:43:56.520]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang on.
[01:43:56.520 --> 01:43:58.520]  Hey!
[01:44:00.520 --> 01:44:03.520]  Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:03.520 --> 01:44:04.520]  Boring!
[01:44:04.520 --> 01:44:07.520]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.520 --> 01:44:08.520]  What?
[01:44:08.520 --> 01:44:12.520]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.520 --> 01:44:16.520]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[01:44:16.520 --> 01:44:19.520]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.520 --> 01:44:22.520]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found
[01:44:22.520 --> 01:44:25.520]  in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.520 --> 01:44:28.520]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity,
[01:44:28.520 --> 01:44:30.520]  but there is hope.
[01:44:30.520 --> 01:44:32.520]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[01:44:32.520 --> 01:44:36.520]  and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.520 --> 01:44:39.520]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading
[01:44:39.520 --> 01:44:43.520]  and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.520 --> 01:44:46.520]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[01:44:46.520 --> 01:44:50.520]  then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.520 --> 01:44:55.520]  or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.520 --> 01:44:57.520]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include
[01:44:57.520 --> 01:45:01.520]  discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.520 --> 01:45:04.520]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.520 --> 01:45:07.520]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:07.520 --> 01:45:11.520]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:11.520 --> 01:45:15.520]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.520 --> 01:45:19.520]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.520 --> 01:45:23.520]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.520 --> 01:45:28.520]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.520 --> 01:45:31.520]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.520 --> 01:45:34.520]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.520 --> 01:45:39.520]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.520 --> 01:45:43.520]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.520 --> 01:45:48.520]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:48.520 --> 01:45:52.520]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.520 --> 01:45:56.520]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:56.520 --> 01:46:01.520]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:19.520 --> 01:46:22.520]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:22.520 --> 01:46:25.520]  All right, we are in our last segment.
[01:46:25.520 --> 01:46:27.520]  All right, Truth Raider, what can you do?
[01:46:27.520 --> 01:46:29.520]  Well, here's what you can do.
[01:46:29.520 --> 01:46:34.520]  You can paint a sign, start a website, start a blog, join a group,
[01:46:34.520 --> 01:46:38.520]  make telephone calls, write letters, take out news ads,
[01:46:38.520 --> 01:46:44.520]  newspaper, television, radio, whatever you want to do.
[01:46:44.520 --> 01:46:45.520]  Very good.
[01:46:45.520 --> 01:46:47.520]  Well, I've done a couple of those things.
[01:46:47.520 --> 01:46:52.520]  I did call the EPA office in Seattle a little over a year ago,
[01:46:52.520 --> 01:46:58.520]  and I got this bureaucratic off-playing-dumb type of a thing with me
[01:46:58.520 --> 01:47:01.520]  when I spoke to an agent, and as a matter of fact,
[01:47:01.520 --> 01:47:05.520]  he did say that it was concerning FEMA Region 10, so he did admit to that.
[01:47:05.520 --> 01:47:06.520]  Okay, well, hang on.
[01:47:06.520 --> 01:47:07.520]  I do have another caller.
[01:47:07.520 --> 01:47:09.520]  You just asked what you could do.
[01:47:09.520 --> 01:47:10.520]  I answered that question.
[01:47:10.520 --> 01:47:11.520]  You got any more?
[01:47:11.520 --> 01:47:12.520]  No, no.
[01:47:12.520 --> 01:47:13.520]  Okay.
[01:47:13.520 --> 01:47:14.520]  That's it, Eddie.
[01:47:14.520 --> 01:47:15.520]  Thank you very much.
[01:47:15.520 --> 01:47:18.520]  I'll see what I can do further, but that's what they did.
[01:47:18.520 --> 01:47:19.520]  They just played dumb with me.
[01:47:19.520 --> 01:47:20.520]  That's what they did.
[01:47:20.520 --> 01:47:23.520]  They said it's classified information and stuff that we can't really talk about.
[01:47:23.520 --> 01:47:26.520]  You can express your opinion or whatever, make a complaint if you'd like,
[01:47:26.520 --> 01:47:28.520]  but there's not much that we can do here,
[01:47:28.520 --> 01:47:29.520]  and we don't know too much about it.
[01:47:29.520 --> 01:47:30.520]  It's classified information.
[01:47:30.520 --> 01:47:31.520]  Yeah.
[01:47:31.520 --> 01:47:32.520]  Okay.
[01:47:32.520 --> 01:47:34.520]  Well, hang on there.
[01:47:34.520 --> 01:47:35.520]  All right.
[01:47:35.520 --> 01:47:36.520]  All right, folks.
[01:47:36.520 --> 01:47:38.520]  Now, we got Sheila in Maryland.
[01:47:38.520 --> 01:47:41.520]  Sheila, what can we do for you?
[01:47:41.520 --> 01:47:42.520]  Oh, yeah.
[01:47:42.520 --> 01:47:47.520]  I was just wondering, I had gotten your information on tickets,
[01:47:47.520 --> 01:47:51.520]  but I had went to court, and I was kind of caught off guard.
[01:47:51.520 --> 01:47:57.520]  So the judge ruled that I had to pay this $257 for this ticket,
[01:47:57.520 --> 01:47:59.520]  and he gave me a date to pay it back.
[01:47:59.520 --> 01:48:01.520]  And I told him I didn't have the money,
[01:48:01.520 --> 01:48:08.520]  so he said, well, you need to pay this ticket by March 8th.
[01:48:08.520 --> 01:48:09.520]  Okay.
[01:48:09.520 --> 01:48:12.520]  So I'm just saying...
[01:48:12.520 --> 01:48:17.520]  Did you do an appeal?
[01:48:17.520 --> 01:48:19.520]  No, I didn't do an appeal.
[01:48:19.520 --> 01:48:20.520]  Okay.
[01:48:20.520 --> 01:48:22.520]  And when did you go to court on this?
[01:48:22.520 --> 01:48:25.520]  I went to court, I think it was...
[01:48:25.520 --> 01:48:27.520]  This is beginning of February.
[01:48:27.520 --> 01:48:29.520]  I think it might have been like February 13th.
[01:48:29.520 --> 01:48:32.520]  Okay.
[01:48:32.520 --> 01:48:37.520]  Did they tell you you had the option of appealing?
[01:48:37.520 --> 01:48:39.520]  I'm not sure.
[01:48:39.520 --> 01:48:42.520]  They just told me I had to pay this ticket,
[01:48:42.520 --> 01:48:46.520]  either I get three points or pay $257.
[01:48:46.520 --> 01:48:47.520]  Okay.
[01:48:47.520 --> 01:48:48.520]  You know what he...
[01:48:48.520 --> 01:48:51.520]  Okay.
[01:48:51.520 --> 01:48:52.520]  All right.
[01:48:52.520 --> 01:48:55.520]  So anyway, you were about to say?
[01:48:55.520 --> 01:48:57.520]  There was so much going on.
[01:48:57.520 --> 01:49:00.520]  He might have said something about if you...
[01:49:00.520 --> 01:49:01.520]  I think he might have said something,
[01:49:01.520 --> 01:49:03.520]  if you appeal, it ain't going to make no difference or something,
[01:49:03.520 --> 01:49:06.520]  something to that effect.
[01:49:06.520 --> 01:49:07.520]  Okay.
[01:49:07.520 --> 01:49:12.520]  Well, that's possibly true considering, you know,
[01:49:12.520 --> 01:49:14.520]  what you did at the beginning.
[01:49:14.520 --> 01:49:15.520]  But...
[01:49:15.520 --> 01:49:16.520]  All right.
[01:49:16.520 --> 01:49:22.520]  In Maryland, are traffic tickets criminal or civil?
[01:49:22.520 --> 01:49:25.520]  It was at the federal court, so I'm assuming...
[01:49:25.520 --> 01:49:26.520]  No, no, no, no.
[01:49:26.520 --> 01:49:27.520]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:49:27.520 --> 01:49:31.520]  You would not be going to the federal court for a ticket?
[01:49:31.520 --> 01:49:33.520]  It was at the district court.
[01:49:33.520 --> 01:49:35.520]  Is it district federal?
[01:49:35.520 --> 01:49:37.520]  Well, there's a federal district court,
[01:49:37.520 --> 01:49:39.520]  and then there may be a state district court.
[01:49:39.520 --> 01:49:43.520]  But in Maryland, district doesn't mean much.
[01:49:43.520 --> 01:49:46.520]  Their court system there is completely different.
[01:49:46.520 --> 01:49:50.520]  Their district court is like our county court,
[01:49:50.520 --> 01:49:56.520]  which is only one step above idiots.
[01:49:56.520 --> 01:49:57.520]  Okay.
[01:49:57.520 --> 01:49:59.520]  And you know, I was just so upset
[01:49:59.520 --> 01:50:02.520]  because they kind of caught me off guard
[01:50:02.520 --> 01:50:06.520]  because this ticket was given to me two years ago.
[01:50:06.520 --> 01:50:08.520]  And you know, I was just so upset when I left there
[01:50:08.520 --> 01:50:11.520]  because I was supposed to just deny everything.
[01:50:11.520 --> 01:50:13.520]  Oh, and then this is another thing, Eddie.
[01:50:13.520 --> 01:50:14.520]  Okay, wait, wait, wait.
[01:50:14.520 --> 01:50:15.520]  My question...
[01:50:15.520 --> 01:50:18.520]  That's something else you need to look at.
[01:50:18.520 --> 01:50:21.520]  If the ticket was two years old,
[01:50:21.520 --> 01:50:25.520]  did they have an outstanding warrant for you?
[01:50:25.520 --> 01:50:26.520]  Yeah.
[01:50:26.520 --> 01:50:29.520]  I had to go turn myself in because I didn't even know...
[01:50:29.520 --> 01:50:33.520]  Did you actually see the warrant?
[01:50:33.520 --> 01:50:34.520]  No, I didn't see it.
[01:50:34.520 --> 01:50:36.520]  But what had happened,
[01:50:36.520 --> 01:50:39.520]  I think I was trying to get my license,
[01:50:39.520 --> 01:50:43.520]  and they told me that I had to...
[01:50:43.520 --> 01:50:46.520]  They told me to come down to the court
[01:50:46.520 --> 01:50:49.520]  and let them know what happened.
[01:50:49.520 --> 01:50:52.520]  And so my brother told me, he said,
[01:50:52.520 --> 01:50:53.520]  don't go down to the court
[01:50:53.520 --> 01:50:55.520]  because if you do, they're going to lock you up.
[01:50:55.520 --> 01:50:57.520]  So he said, just turn yourself in, and that's what I did.
[01:50:57.520 --> 01:50:59.520]  But no, I didn't see no warrant.
[01:50:59.520 --> 01:51:02.520]  Okay, you need to go get copies of everything
[01:51:02.520 --> 01:51:04.520]  that was in that court file
[01:51:04.520 --> 01:51:09.520]  because Maryland has a statute of limitations on everything
[01:51:09.520 --> 01:51:11.520]  just like everybody else does.
[01:51:11.520 --> 01:51:14.520]  If this was outside of the timeframe
[01:51:14.520 --> 01:51:16.520]  from which they could take it to court,
[01:51:16.520 --> 01:51:20.520]  then the judgment against you is invalid.
[01:51:20.520 --> 01:51:22.520]  In fact, it's illegal.
[01:51:22.520 --> 01:51:27.520]  And if this is civil and administrative also
[01:51:27.520 --> 01:51:29.520]  rather than criminal,
[01:51:29.520 --> 01:51:32.520]  you may be able to go after the so-called judge
[01:51:32.520 --> 01:51:35.520]  who isn't really a judge in this case.
[01:51:35.520 --> 01:51:37.520]  Could this happen then?
[01:51:37.520 --> 01:51:38.520]  I think it was...
[01:51:38.520 --> 01:51:41.520]  Is it either 2012 or 2013?
[01:51:41.520 --> 01:51:44.520]  Well, you need a copy of every piece of paper
[01:51:44.520 --> 01:51:46.520]  that's associated with this case
[01:51:46.520 --> 01:51:47.520]  that you could get your hands on,
[01:51:47.520 --> 01:51:49.520]  the original citation,
[01:51:49.520 --> 01:51:51.520]  whatever's in the court record,
[01:51:51.520 --> 01:51:56.520]  anything that's been mailed to you, so on and so forth.
[01:51:56.520 --> 01:51:58.520]  If there is anybody out there in Maryland
[01:51:58.520 --> 01:52:01.520]  that is listening to this
[01:52:01.520 --> 01:52:03.520]  and would like to help Sheila out,
[01:52:03.520 --> 01:52:05.520]  please send me an email,
[01:52:05.520 --> 01:52:10.520]  Eddie, E-D-D-I-E, at Rule of Law Radio.
[01:52:10.520 --> 01:52:13.520]  And Sheila, if you will send me an email as well,
[01:52:13.520 --> 01:52:16.520]  I will try to put the two of you together
[01:52:16.520 --> 01:52:20.520]  and see if there's something that can be done with this.
[01:52:20.520 --> 01:52:23.520]  Eddie, let me say this, too,
[01:52:23.520 --> 01:52:25.520]  because I was listening to one of your things
[01:52:25.520 --> 01:52:28.520]  and I remember you was talking about
[01:52:28.520 --> 01:52:30.520]  that the driver's license was commercial,
[01:52:30.520 --> 01:52:32.520]  so they had my record there,
[01:52:32.520 --> 01:52:33.520]  and they said, well, let her see this record.
[01:52:33.520 --> 01:52:35.520]  And I was looking at the record,
[01:52:35.520 --> 01:52:37.520]  so I asked the prosecuting attorney,
[01:52:37.520 --> 01:52:40.520]  I said, what do you mean by commercial
[01:52:40.520 --> 01:52:43.520]  right here on my driving record?
[01:52:43.520 --> 01:52:46.520]  And she said that was a revelant.
[01:52:46.520 --> 01:52:48.520]  I was just so upset because after I left,
[01:52:48.520 --> 01:52:50.520]  I was supposed to object to that
[01:52:50.520 --> 01:52:52.520]  and let them know if that was a revelant,
[01:52:52.520 --> 01:52:55.520]  everything in my record was a revelant.
[01:52:55.520 --> 01:52:57.520]  Yeah, pretty much.
[01:52:57.520 --> 01:52:59.520]  Because they had the commercial on there,
[01:52:59.520 --> 01:53:01.520]  and I remember one of your tapes
[01:53:01.520 --> 01:53:02.520]  that you were saying,
[01:53:02.520 --> 01:53:05.520]  only commercial people have commercial,
[01:53:05.520 --> 01:53:08.520]  like not citizens.
[01:53:08.520 --> 01:53:10.520]  Right, well, all licenses are commercial.
[01:53:10.520 --> 01:53:12.520]  What they've done is convince you
[01:53:12.520 --> 01:53:15.520]  that you have to have one.
[01:53:15.520 --> 01:53:19.520]  They completely act as if the commercial nexus
[01:53:19.520 --> 01:53:21.520]  is not associated with the license.
[01:53:21.520 --> 01:53:23.520]  They try to play the license off
[01:53:23.520 --> 01:53:25.520]  as a public safety scheme
[01:53:25.520 --> 01:53:31.520]  that they want everybody to be properly trained
[01:53:31.520 --> 01:53:33.520]  and the license is supposed to certify
[01:53:33.520 --> 01:53:35.520]  that that's the case.
[01:53:35.520 --> 01:53:36.520]  Well, guess what?
[01:53:36.520 --> 01:53:38.520]  That's a bogus argument.
[01:53:38.520 --> 01:53:41.520]  Because if that is the basis of your argument,
[01:53:41.520 --> 01:53:43.520]  someone with a license should never be involved
[01:53:43.520 --> 01:53:45.520]  in an accident, right?
[01:53:45.520 --> 01:53:48.520]  At least not one that they can be blamed for.
[01:53:48.520 --> 01:53:49.520]  Right, exactly.
[01:53:49.520 --> 01:53:52.520]  All right, so if that is the measuring stick,
[01:53:52.520 --> 01:53:55.520]  anyone with a license should never be involved
[01:53:55.520 --> 01:54:01.520]  in an accident with another licensed driver.
[01:54:01.520 --> 01:54:04.520]  In fact, the only people that should be having accidents
[01:54:04.520 --> 01:54:08.520]  that are not actual accidents
[01:54:08.520 --> 01:54:13.520]  should be unlicensed drivers according to that argument.
[01:54:13.520 --> 01:54:16.520]  So it's a big scheme to get everybody in there
[01:54:16.520 --> 01:54:18.520]  so they can regulate you, control you,
[01:54:18.520 --> 01:54:19.520]  and take your money.
[01:54:19.520 --> 01:54:21.520]  That's what it's always been about.
[01:54:21.520 --> 01:54:25.520]  And we've been stupid enough to let them do it.
[01:54:25.520 --> 01:54:28.520]  Okay, I need another statute to go to.
[01:54:28.520 --> 01:54:30.520]  Well, that's what I can't tell you.
[01:54:30.520 --> 01:54:33.520]  I don't know the Maryland statutes well enough to do that.
[01:54:33.520 --> 01:54:35.520]  Maryland is not my home state.
[01:54:35.520 --> 01:54:38.520]  Texas is.
[01:54:38.520 --> 01:54:41.520]  But I do have listeners in Maryland
[01:54:41.520 --> 01:54:44.520]  that have fought this issue, and if they're listening
[01:54:44.520 --> 01:54:48.520]  or hear the podcast and everything on this later
[01:54:48.520 --> 01:54:51.520]  or go back and listen to the archive, please, like I say,
[01:54:51.520 --> 01:54:55.520]  this is the 23rd of February 2015 show,
[01:54:55.520 --> 01:54:59.520]  so please send me an email so I can hook you up with Sheila here
[01:54:59.520 --> 01:55:03.520]  and y'all can help her out as best you can.
[01:55:03.520 --> 01:55:05.520]  You would have to look.
[01:55:05.520 --> 01:55:07.520]  I don't know if Maryland's got a transportation code
[01:55:07.520 --> 01:55:09.520]  or a motor vehicle code, Sheila,
[01:55:09.520 --> 01:55:11.520]  and I don't know if it's one big continuous code
[01:55:11.520 --> 01:55:14.520]  with separate chapters or if it's an individual code.
[01:55:14.520 --> 01:55:17.520]  I just don't know.
[01:55:17.520 --> 01:55:20.520]  But I can tell you that the rules and regulations
[01:55:20.520 --> 01:55:24.520]  are almost identical across all the states
[01:55:24.520 --> 01:55:28.520]  as to how they work and how they apply.
[01:55:28.520 --> 01:55:33.520]  So that being said, as soon as you will get me an email
[01:55:33.520 --> 01:55:35.520]  and get all of your information together
[01:55:35.520 --> 01:55:37.520]  and get copies of it scanned in,
[01:55:37.520 --> 01:55:39.520]  if you want to redact your private information
[01:55:39.520 --> 01:55:43.520]  like your address and your full name and stuff like that,
[01:55:43.520 --> 01:55:47.520]  scan them into your computer, black that information out on the image,
[01:55:47.520 --> 01:55:51.520]  and then you can send that image to me
[01:55:51.520 --> 01:55:56.520]  and whoever we link you up with after you approve it.
[01:55:56.520 --> 01:55:59.520]  I'll put the two of you together and send your information to them,
[01:55:59.520 --> 01:56:01.520]  however you want to do it.
[01:56:01.520 --> 01:56:02.520]  Okay.
[01:56:02.520 --> 01:56:05.520]  Well, I'm not familiar with all that stuff on the computer,
[01:56:05.520 --> 01:56:07.520]  so any other way I can send it?
[01:56:07.520 --> 01:56:11.520]  You got a 10-year-old grandchild or niece or nephew?
[01:56:11.520 --> 01:56:12.520]  Yeah.
[01:56:12.520 --> 01:56:13.520]  All right.
[01:56:13.520 --> 01:56:15.520]  They should.
[01:56:15.520 --> 01:56:16.520]  Okay.
[01:56:16.520 --> 01:56:17.520]  Scan it over the computer.
[01:56:17.520 --> 01:56:18.520]  Yeah.
[01:56:18.520 --> 01:56:22.520]  They can tell you how to scan it in or maybe even do it for you
[01:56:22.520 --> 01:56:24.520]  and then how to black out the information
[01:56:24.520 --> 01:56:28.520]  and turn it into an image that they can email or whatever.
[01:56:28.520 --> 01:56:29.520]  Okay.
[01:56:29.520 --> 01:56:30.520]  Okay?
[01:56:30.520 --> 01:56:31.520]  Okay.
[01:56:31.520 --> 01:56:33.520]  Or you can just go ahead and scan it in the computer,
[01:56:33.520 --> 01:56:36.520]  get it blacked out and ready, and hold it,
[01:56:36.520 --> 01:56:39.520]  and then as soon as someone contacts me and I hook you up with them,
[01:56:39.520 --> 01:56:42.520]  you can decide whether or not to send it directly to them,
[01:56:42.520 --> 01:56:44.520]  and that way I'm not in the middle.
[01:56:44.520 --> 01:56:48.520]  Because my time, I don't always check my email for days at a time
[01:56:48.520 --> 01:56:50.520]  in some cases because I'm not here
[01:56:50.520 --> 01:56:52.520]  or I'm in the middle of writing something
[01:56:52.520 --> 01:56:56.520]  or I'm at court or whatever, and I'm not able to check it.
[01:56:56.520 --> 01:57:00.520]  So there would be delays if I have to play middleman.
[01:57:00.520 --> 01:57:02.520]  Okay.
[01:57:02.520 --> 01:57:03.520]  Okay.
[01:57:03.520 --> 01:57:04.520]  That sounds good.
[01:57:04.520 --> 01:57:05.520]  Okay.
[01:57:05.520 --> 01:57:06.520]  Appreciate that.
[01:57:06.520 --> 01:57:07.520]  All right.
[01:57:07.520 --> 01:57:08.520]  Thanks a lot.
[01:57:08.520 --> 01:57:09.520]  You're very welcome.
[01:57:09.520 --> 01:57:10.520]  All right.
[01:57:10.520 --> 01:57:11.520]  Well, that came out just about right
[01:57:11.520 --> 01:57:14.520]  because we got just about a minute left in the show here,
[01:57:14.520 --> 01:57:16.520]  a minute and a half to be exact.
[01:57:16.520 --> 01:57:18.520]  So that's going to come out good.
[01:57:18.520 --> 01:57:19.520]  All right, folks.
[01:57:19.520 --> 01:57:22.520]  So like I say, the insurance, the compulsory insurance
[01:57:22.520 --> 01:57:26.520]  and the transportation code here in Texas and the other states,
[01:57:26.520 --> 01:57:31.520]  it has never been about the ability to compensate the injured party.
[01:57:31.520 --> 01:57:35.520]  It has been about guaranteeing a built-in profit margin
[01:57:35.520 --> 01:57:42.520]  for the insurance companies and lowering their payouts in lawsuits.
[01:57:42.520 --> 01:57:45.520]  It's to protect their profits.
[01:57:45.520 --> 01:57:47.520]  It's got nothing to do with you and me
[01:57:47.520 --> 01:57:54.520]  or keeping us compensated for any harm done to us by their clients.
[01:57:54.520 --> 01:57:58.520]  It's baloney, and we need to get the legislators
[01:57:58.520 --> 01:58:03.520]  to stop trying to force it down our throats.
[01:58:03.520 --> 01:58:08.520]  The prices would go way down if they had to compete fairly for our business
[01:58:08.520 --> 01:58:13.520]  instead of us being forced at the barrel of a gun to buy it.
[01:58:13.520 --> 01:58:15.520]  It's that simple.
[01:58:15.520 --> 01:58:16.520]  All right, folks.
[01:58:16.520 --> 01:58:18.520]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show
[01:58:18.520 --> 01:58:19.520]  with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:19.520 --> 01:58:22.520]  Thank you all so much for calling in and for listening.
[01:58:22.520 --> 01:58:25.520]  I hope that everyone has a blessed week.
[01:58:25.520 --> 01:58:26.520]  Good night.
[01:58:26.520 --> 01:58:50.520]  God bless.
[01:58:50.520 --> 01:58:53.520]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free
[01:58:53.520 --> 01:58:57.520]  a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.520 --> 01:59:01.520]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes
[01:59:01.520 --> 01:59:04.520]  that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.520 --> 01:59:08.520]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.520 --> 01:59:11.520]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.520 --> 01:59:16.520]  Call us toll-free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.520 --> 01:59:20.520]  or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.520 --> 01:59:24.520]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000
[01:59:24.520 --> 01:59:28.520]  cross references plus charts and maps and an outline
[01:59:28.520 --> 01:59:29.520]  for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.520 --> 01:59:32.520]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.520 --> 01:59:35.520]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:35.520 --> 01:59:40.520]  call us toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.520 --> 01:59:49.520]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.520 --> 01:59:52.520]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.520 --> 02:00:21.520]  You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.