[00:00.000 --> 00:07.500]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates, online
[00:07.500 --> 00:08.500]  at thelibertybeat.com.
[00:08.500 --> 00:12.300]  I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, February 9th, 2015.
[00:12.300 --> 00:20.020]  Gold is trading at $1,234, silver at $16.73, and bitcoin is trading around $222.60.
[00:20.020 --> 00:26.780]  Today's bitcoin price brought to you by ExpressCoin, the fastest, most reliable way to buy bitcoin.
[00:26.780 --> 00:29.460]  Buy bitcoin today at ExpressCoin.com.
[00:29.460 --> 00:33.560]  Extreme weather, from droughts lasting for weeks, and torrential rainstorms robbing the
[00:33.560 --> 00:39.040]  country of vital crops for food, to snowstorms of 70 inches plus stopping cities in their
[00:39.040 --> 00:40.040]  tracks.
[00:40.040 --> 00:44.440]  Supporting your family through these difficult times is what eFoodsDirect does.
[00:44.440 --> 00:51.280]  Go to eFoodsDirect.com slash Liberty Beat or call 800-620-5520 to learn more about food
[00:51.280 --> 00:53.320]  security in a time of crisis.
[00:53.320 --> 00:57.720]  In the news, it's a Good Samaritan story involving police accountability.
[00:57.720 --> 00:59.600]  With Danny Panzella, explains.
[00:59.600 --> 01:03.640]  In Louisville, Kentucky, Louis Mossy came to the aid of a woman being brutally attacked
[01:03.640 --> 01:08.200]  by her husband, Jonathan Osborne, an officer of the Louisville Metro Police Department
[01:08.200 --> 01:09.200]  for 10 years.
[01:09.200 --> 01:13.920]  He had her in a chokehold and he was standing behind her and her feet were barely touching
[01:13.920 --> 01:17.400]  the ground and I didn't know if he was trying to kill her or what.
[01:17.400 --> 01:21.840]  Mossy then tackled Osborne, breaking his own wrist, but managing to keep him subdued until
[01:21.840 --> 01:23.720]  police arrived 10 minutes later.
[01:23.720 --> 01:28.600]  Normally somebody's quick to grab your phones out and just record it, but I just can't bear
[01:28.600 --> 01:30.840]  to see somebody being treated like that.
[01:30.840 --> 01:35.320]  Osborne now faces charges of aggravated battery, domestic battery, resisting law enforcement,
[01:35.320 --> 01:37.720]  criminal recklessness, and public intoxication.
[01:37.720 --> 01:42.920]  He's currently free on a $30,000 bond.
[01:42.920 --> 01:45.600]  It happened in Texas on Super Bowl Sunday.
[01:45.600 --> 01:47.560]  Again, here's Danny Panzella.
[01:47.560 --> 01:51.520]  Witnesses to a brutal arrest by the Austin Police Department are speaking out.
[01:51.520 --> 01:57.280]  He literally bled about a pint of blood and he was laying on the ground as if he was dead.
[01:57.280 --> 02:01.800]  Police reportedly attempted to place Luis Marquez de la Fuente under arrest for public
[02:01.800 --> 02:02.800]  intoxication.
[02:02.800 --> 02:04.280]  The guy wasn't resisting arrest.
[02:04.280 --> 02:05.280]  He wasn't fighting the cops.
[02:05.280 --> 02:09.400]  His brain hit the ground so hard you could hear the skull hitting the ground.
[02:09.400 --> 02:13.880]  Luis' brother Gabriel, fearing for his brother's life, attempted to intervene and was also
[02:13.880 --> 02:14.880]  arrested.
[02:14.880 --> 02:18.920]  Police Chief Art Acevedo declines comment on the case and it remains unclear if the
[02:18.920 --> 02:21.160]  officers involved remain on duty.
[02:21.160 --> 02:24.920]  For more about police accountability, visit TheLibertyBeat.com.
[02:24.920 --> 02:29.160]  The Liberty Beat is brought to you by Cabo Bobs, southwestern-style burritos.
[02:29.160 --> 02:34.600]  Now at two locations in Austin, 500 East Pinwyte Boulevard and 2828 Rio Grande Boulevard.
[02:34.600 --> 02:37.160]  Find them online, Cabobobs.com.
[02:37.160 --> 02:41.080]  Support for The Liberty Beat also comes from the Texas Bitcoin Conference.
[02:41.080 --> 02:45.880]  Hear from speakers such as Charlie Schramm, Dr. Robert Murphy, Vitalik Buterin, and Catherine
[02:45.880 --> 02:46.880]  Gleisch.
[02:46.880 --> 02:49.760]  March 28th and 29th, tickets on sale now.
[02:49.760 --> 02:51.640]  Visit TexasBitcoinConference.com.
[02:51.640 --> 02:57.120]  This is The Liberty Beat for Monday, February 9th, 2015.
[02:57.120 --> 03:20.400]  Check out the website at TheLibertyBeat.com.
[03:20.400 --> 03:40.360]  Check out the website at TheLibertyBeat.com.
[03:40.360 --> 04:05.320]  Check out the website at TheLibertyBeat.com.
[04:05.320 --> 04:25.280]  Check out the website at TheLibertyBeat.com.
[04:25.280 --> 04:39.740]  Check out the website at TheLibertyBeat.com.
[04:39.740 --> 04:42.300]  This is The Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show.
[04:42.300 --> 04:49.660]  It is February 9th, 2015 and we are going on and on.
[04:49.660 --> 04:55.220]  Yesterday's class, I think, though we did not get to do what we were intending to do,
[04:55.220 --> 05:01.620]  which is conduct a full mock trial. We had enough new faces in there that became necessary to
[05:02.580 --> 05:08.660]  give them the relevant information to how this is going to play out in order to set everything up
[05:08.660 --> 05:13.220]  for the mock trial. So hopefully those same people will be able to come back next Sunday and we will
[05:13.220 --> 05:20.260]  have more people there than we had this past Sunday. This past Sunday was the largest class
[05:20.260 --> 05:30.340]  we've had in months. It really astounds me that the class is as small as it is on such a regular
[05:30.340 --> 05:37.140]  basis. It astounds me also that people wish to wait until the very last minute until they
[05:37.140 --> 05:43.300]  have a problem or have already created a problem for themselves before they decide to learn what
[05:43.300 --> 05:51.140]  to do about it. You know, that's like somebody that refuses to learn first aid because no one
[05:51.140 --> 05:56.740]  they know has ever gotten injured or choked on something. And then the first time when they
[05:56.740 --> 06:04.820]  actually need it, they don't know it and now what? So this, however, can wind up to be a lot more
[06:04.820 --> 06:13.540]  serious long term by not knowing what to do before it becomes a problem. So
[06:15.540 --> 06:22.660]  folks, we need more participation in the class, not to make me more money, but to get more people
[06:22.660 --> 06:32.260]  educated and involved. Everybody that I know of in this movement is such a great armchair patriot
[06:32.260 --> 06:39.380]  that it's not even funny. They can sit and talk and moan and groan and complain and everything
[06:39.380 --> 06:47.940]  as good as any other patriot in the business. But when it becomes a necessity for them to learn
[06:47.940 --> 06:54.900]  how to apply something and how to do something, they're too afraid, they're too lazy, or they
[06:54.900 --> 07:00.180]  already think they know more than they actually do. So they're too prideful to come learn from
[07:00.180 --> 07:10.020]  someone else anything, whether it's useful or not. And I don't know, to me, that's just a mindset of
[07:10.900 --> 07:15.380]  I don't need it, I don't need it. But the whole problem is we've gotten where we are in America
[07:15.380 --> 07:20.980]  because people have taken that mindset. It doesn't affect me, so I'm not going to worry about it.
[07:20.980 --> 07:24.660]  That's not my problem, so I'm not going to worry about it. It hadn't happened to me, so I'm not
[07:24.660 --> 07:32.900]  going to worry about it. That's not any way to be thinking these days. Because when it does happen
[07:32.900 --> 07:41.540]  to you, it's too late. When it happens to someone you care about, it's too late. Fighting it after
[07:41.540 --> 07:47.780]  you've made a mess of things is infinitely more difficult than knowing what to do to keep it in
[07:47.780 --> 07:55.380]  the proper setting and place from the very beginning. And it astounds me the number of
[07:55.380 --> 08:02.100]  people that wants to just bypass all that for what they do. Now that being said, we don't have any
[08:02.100 --> 08:07.460]  collars up on the board, so I want to spend a few minutes talking about some of the things we talked
[08:07.460 --> 08:15.140]  about in class yesterday, but this one dealing most importantly with the complaint being used
[08:15.140 --> 08:21.620]  in justice and municipal courts. Now you have to do historical research on this to understand this
[08:21.620 --> 08:26.820]  from this perspective. Once you've read all the case opinions, once you've read how these judges
[08:26.820 --> 08:32.340]  have gone back and done their historical research, or more aptly, how their clerks have done it,
[08:34.820 --> 08:41.620]  you will come to understand that they will write an opinion any way they want regardless of how
[08:41.620 --> 08:48.980]  weak the support for their position is. And you can tell when they know they're operating from
[08:48.980 --> 08:58.740]  a weak position because they will hang their hat on one single nail of an argument, even though
[08:58.740 --> 09:07.300]  there are six that say that argument is wrong. They will completely ignore those six as if they
[09:07.300 --> 09:13.060]  don't exist just so that their one will stand up in the light they want to cast it in.
[09:14.820 --> 09:21.140]  And nowhere does that become as obvious as in understanding the issue of the criminal complaint.
[09:22.260 --> 09:28.420]  Now what I want to do is I want to read you the provision of the Texas Constitution where this
[09:28.420 --> 09:38.820]  entire argument is based. And it is ludicrous that they have not reasoned this out beyond the
[09:38.820 --> 09:44.900]  point that they have, especially considering the number of years this has been going on.
[09:46.740 --> 09:54.420]  But it is Article 5, Section 17. If I get in the right section or right article here,
[09:54.420 --> 10:01.860]  I might actually be able to show that. Article 5, Section 17 of the Texas Constitution,
[10:01.860 --> 10:11.060]  which is, of course, the Judicial Department article. And we go down to 17 and this is what we
[10:11.060 --> 10:18.660]  read. Well, hang on. We'll get there in just a second. They keep changing the online stuff
[10:18.660 --> 10:25.780]  and moving it around. All right. Section 17 of Article 5, terms of county court, prosecutions,
[10:25.780 --> 10:31.540]  and juries. The prosecutions provision is what interests us the most. But listen carefully to
[10:31.540 --> 10:40.100]  this. The county court shall hold terms as provided by law. Okay. That's terms of court.
[10:40.100 --> 10:46.980]  That's the only line dealing with what's in the title for terms of court. The second is prosecutions,
[10:46.980 --> 10:57.060]  which is this line. Prosecutions may be commenced in said court by information filed by the county
[10:57.060 --> 11:06.100]  attorney or by affidavit, as may be provided by law. Now, what the courts are trying to say is
[11:06.100 --> 11:15.540]  that the affidavit in this case is the criminal complaint. Now, here is the problem with that
[11:15.540 --> 11:23.460]  argument. First off, you have to understand what an affidavit is and what an affidavit isn't.
[11:25.620 --> 11:33.780]  A document can only be a proper affidavit if it meets several specific legal criteria as set
[11:33.780 --> 11:42.340]  forth by the courts. A couple of those criteria are, one, it cannot contain any qualifying
[11:42.340 --> 11:53.380]  statements such as the affiant is of the opinion that or the affiant believes that or the affiant
[11:53.380 --> 12:02.020]  thinks that or the affiant understands that. None of those will be sufficient in an affidavit for
[12:02.020 --> 12:07.380]  it to comply and be a valid affidavit for the purpose of submitting it in a court.
[12:07.380 --> 12:15.300]  Another element of an affidavit is it must be signed in the affiant section. The signature
[12:15.300 --> 12:20.980]  for the affiant must be someone with personal knowledge of the facts being attested to
[12:20.980 --> 12:29.780]  in the affidavit. The person signing the affidavit as the affiant must have personal first-hand
[12:29.780 --> 12:41.700]  knowledge of the facts being asserted. An affidavit also must be sworn under penalty of perjury.
[12:44.180 --> 12:51.140]  Now, here is where we run afoul with just those three elements. We immediately run afoul
[12:51.140 --> 12:56.420]  of the issue with a criminal complaint being the affidavit spoken of here.
[12:56.420 --> 13:02.500]  Even though the criminal complaint is signed by an affiant and there is a verifier, the verifier
[13:02.500 --> 13:10.660]  is not verifying that the person is swearing to the facts in the complaint. They're verifying
[13:10.660 --> 13:17.540]  that the person who signed it is the person who signed it. How do we know this? The other criteria,
[13:17.540 --> 13:22.020]  a criminal complaint contains the language, I have reason to believe in due course.
[13:22.020 --> 13:26.660]  A criminal complaint contains the language, I have reason to believe in due believe.
[13:27.380 --> 13:34.900]  Those are qualifying statements. Those are not allowed in affidavits. The second problem is,
[13:34.900 --> 13:41.860]  is the affiant in a criminal complaint is not required to be someone with personal knowledge
[13:41.860 --> 13:52.580]  of the facts being asserted or the facts being alleged because the facts are not facts if they're
[13:52.580 --> 14:01.060]  hearsay. Therefore, all they're doing is repeating what they've been told. They don't know if they're
[14:01.060 --> 14:08.100]  true. They can't say that they're true. So a complaint right off the bat is nowhere near
[14:08.100 --> 14:17.300]  compliant with the three major requirements of an affidavit. So this affidavit spoken of in Article
[14:17.300 --> 14:24.420]  5, Section 17 cannot possibly be a criminal complaint as that complaint is created, constructed,
[14:24.420 --> 14:34.900]  and used in Texas jurisprudence. So what affidavit is it? Well, what other statement is signed by
[14:34.900 --> 14:42.260]  someone in a criminal case that would meet the requirements of an affidavit?
[14:44.020 --> 14:50.340]  The criminal statement would. When you go down and make a police report to the police department,
[14:50.340 --> 14:56.340]  you have to sign it under penalty of perjury that the facts asserted are true and correct
[14:56.340 --> 15:03.220]  and that you yourself have knowledge of those facts. You have to have personal first-hand
[15:03.220 --> 15:11.860]  knowledge of what you're attesting to. So the verified criminal statement of an actual witness,
[15:13.540 --> 15:22.100]  that would be a valid affidavit. But that's not what they're using to make the complaint.
[15:23.380 --> 15:26.980]  Ninety-nine percent of the time, a clerk of the court is the one that signs of the affidavit.
[15:26.980 --> 15:31.940]  They have no personal first-hand knowledge. They cannot attest that the facts asserted in the
[15:31.940 --> 15:37.220]  complaint are true and correct because they copied them off of a citation or they wrote them down
[15:37.220 --> 15:42.820]  when someone else was telling it to them. And that someone else isn't signing the
[15:43.860 --> 15:52.260]  complaint as the affidavit. Why not? Even if the officer signed the complaint,
[15:52.260 --> 15:59.620]  it's still not an affidavit. You know why? Because the complaint is not required to be signed under
[15:59.620 --> 16:06.580]  penalty of perjury. Plus, it contains the qualifying statements, I have reason to believe and do believe.
[16:08.420 --> 16:13.860]  Now, why am I talking about this and why is it even important? Well, it's important for several reasons.
[16:15.140 --> 16:20.580]  It's important, one, because the courts are all arguing that in a justice and municipal court,
[16:20.580 --> 16:27.140]  the complaint by itself is sufficient to invest the court with jurisdiction of the case. When
[16:27.140 --> 16:33.460]  Article 5, Section 12B of the Constitution doesn't say anything at all about criminal complaints.
[16:34.900 --> 16:41.060]  And in fact, Article 5, Section 17 doesn't say it's a criminal complaint. It says it's an affidavit
[16:41.060 --> 16:48.580]  which we just proved the criminal complaint isn't. So right off the bat, we've got an issue here.
[16:48.580 --> 16:52.260]  So y'all hang on, folks. When we get back, I'm going to finish this discussion up and start
[16:52.260 --> 16:58.820]  taking our phone calls if we get people up on the board. 512-646-1984. We will be right back.
[17:00.420 --> 17:06.340]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.340 --> 17:11.220]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.220 --> 17:17.540]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.540 --> 17:22.260]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[17:22.260 --> 17:27.860]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests
[17:27.860 --> 17:33.620]  to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jevity so
[17:33.620 --> 17:39.940]  much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.940 --> 17:46.660]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality
[17:46.660 --> 17:52.980]  radio. As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[17:52.980 --> 17:58.900]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:58.900 --> 18:04.500]  Order now. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even
[18:04.500 --> 18:10.740]  losses? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won six
[18:10.740 --> 18:15.940]  cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step
[18:15.940 --> 18:20.980]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:20.980 --> 18:26.260]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone
[18:26.260 --> 18:30.900]  calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables
[18:30.900 --> 18:36.900]  on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears proven method is the solution
[18:36.900 --> 18:41.620]  for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more
[18:41.620 --> 18:47.540]  information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email
[18:47.540 --> 18:57.460]  michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.460 --> 19:12.500]  to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:27.460 --> 19:34.420]  I know what I do not have the answer. I do not have the answer.
[19:34.420 --> 19:42.020]  When we ask the question, look what we get. And they don't have the answer.
[19:42.020 --> 19:48.820]  Our scope is little side. They're not going to issue for free. Lord, how they want we can take it easy.
[19:48.820 --> 19:55.060]  They might want we do politically and them getting mad and angry. But they're not standing up
[19:55.060 --> 20:01.860]  and fighting for the freedom and the freedom. And let them love slavery and get hanged.
[20:01.860 --> 20:09.540]  All right, folks, we are back. Now, besides those issues of why the complaint not being
[20:09.540 --> 20:14.660]  this affidavit in the Constitution is a problem, like I said, they're saying that that complaint
[20:14.660 --> 20:19.140]  is what invests the justice and municipal courts with jurisdiction, which flies in the face of
[20:19.140 --> 20:26.660]  Article 5, Section 12B. It also flies in the face of this other part of Article 5, Section 17.
[20:26.660 --> 20:35.060]  Now, listen carefully. Grand juries impaneled in the district courts shall inquire into misdemeanors.
[20:35.860 --> 20:43.060]  And all indictments, therefore, returned into the district courts shall forthwith be certified to
[20:43.060 --> 20:52.580]  the county courts or other inferior courts. Well, what are the county courts underneath
[20:52.580 --> 20:59.060]  the district court? They are the county court at law and the constitutional county court.
[20:59.060 --> 21:04.820]  This is talking about plural. So it's not meaning one or the other in that regard of county court
[21:04.820 --> 21:12.340]  or constitutional county court or county court at law. Okay. It's encompassing them in its plurality
[21:12.340 --> 21:22.340]  of the statement. What gets us is or other inferior courts. Then you go read Chapter 20 of the Code of
[21:22.340 --> 21:30.500]  Criminal Procedure dealing with indictments, and it specifically tells you that a district court
[21:30.500 --> 21:38.340]  that hands down an indictment to a justice court exactly how they're to do it. That doesn't mention
[21:38.340 --> 21:46.020]  an indictment going to a municipal court. Why do you think that is? How can it be a requirement to
[21:46.020 --> 21:52.900]  have an indictment for a Class C fine only in a municipal court or in a justice court, but not
[21:52.900 --> 21:59.300]  the same in a municipal court? And if it's not required, why in the case of Antonio Bueller,
[21:59.300 --> 22:03.460]  did they indict him for a Class C misdemeanor and try him in the Austin municipal court?
[22:03.460 --> 22:09.460]  Because they did get an indictment against him and then tried the case in the Austin municipal court.
[22:11.460 --> 22:16.420]  Now, if they're screaming and hollering that an indictment is not required for misdemeanors,
[22:16.420 --> 22:23.460]  why did they do that? Why does Chapter 20, which everything in Chapter 20, by the way,
[22:23.460 --> 22:37.860]  was enacted in 1965? 1965, okay. The amendment to Article 1, Section 10, which allegedly removed
[22:37.860 --> 22:43.460]  the requirement for a grand jury indictment for misdemeanor cases that did not require
[22:44.100 --> 22:52.100]  incarceration in a state penal facility, is now in direct conflict, as I've told you before,
[22:52.100 --> 23:02.580]  with Article 5, Section 17 right here, and Chapter 20. The amendment in Article 1, Section 10 was in 1909.
[23:05.300 --> 23:16.020]  Chapter 20 was added in its entirety in 1965, is when it became active. So that means it was
[23:16.020 --> 23:23.540]  actually passed in 60... Well, it would have had to have been active at some point in 65,
[23:23.540 --> 23:29.220]  because they only meet in the odd number of years, and they'll set it up to go into effect
[23:29.220 --> 23:39.140]  over those years. So the actual bill was either enacted in 1963 and didn't take effect until 65,
[23:39.140 --> 23:47.780]  or it was enacted earlier in 65 to take effect later in 65. But why, if it was not a requirement
[23:48.500 --> 23:58.340]  under the Texas Constitution any longer, would they require it in the statute in 1965? Okay.
[23:58.340 --> 24:12.340]  What is it, 54 years later? Or 56 years later? So, but now listen to this again real careful here.
[24:13.380 --> 24:21.540]  Okay. Dealing with the grand juries and the all indictments therefore returned for your
[24:21.540 --> 24:28.020]  courts, blah, blah, blah. But where it says, prosecutions commenced in said court by information
[24:28.020 --> 24:34.740]  filed by the county attorney or by affidavit as may be provided by law. That's the thing,
[24:35.300 --> 24:41.700]  as provided by law. That means that the legislators granted constitutional authority to set the
[24:41.700 --> 24:48.900]  requirements for indictments and information by the statutory laws, which they did in Chapter 20.
[24:48.900 --> 24:55.940]  They also did it in 2.04 and 2.05 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, not just Chapter 20.
[24:57.460 --> 25:02.020]  There has never been a statute in the Code of Criminal Procedure that says,
[25:02.820 --> 25:08.980]  a complaint, invest the municipal court with jurisdiction. There's nothing that says a
[25:08.980 --> 25:15.220]  complaint, invest the justice court with jurisdiction. That determination is made entirely
[25:15.220 --> 25:24.820]  by the courts. But the courts have been ignoring 2.04, 2.05, Chapter 20, and this particular
[25:24.820 --> 25:32.500]  analysis of Article 5, Section 17, where the affidavit cannot possibly be the criminal complaint.
[25:35.860 --> 25:43.220]  So you add all that up and what do we have? We have unlawful, unconstitutional convictions
[25:43.220 --> 25:49.380]  taking place in justice and municipal courts without benefit of a proper indictment of your
[25:49.380 --> 25:58.260]  peers at the grand jury level or a proper charging instrument, which are the only two
[25:58.260 --> 26:05.620]  instruments that invest the court with jurisdiction to try a case. Now, why would the courts keep
[26:05.620 --> 26:10.900]  insisting to protect the way they've set this up? Well, let me make that easy to understand.
[26:10.900 --> 26:17.940]  They're wrong. The lower courts acted in every single instance without proper jurisdiction of
[26:17.940 --> 26:26.420]  any kind. They were completely devoid of jurisdiction because no indictment or information
[26:26.420 --> 26:37.140]  was ever filed in the case. Every conviction they have made was illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional,
[26:37.140 --> 26:48.660]  and no court has immunity for any act it takes upon itself if they don't have jurisdiction to
[26:48.660 --> 27:00.900]  perform the act. The lawsuits would be staggering in number and mind-boggling in dollar loss to the
[27:00.900 --> 27:10.020]  state, all because some judge wanted to shortcut the due process rights of the accused to get
[27:10.020 --> 27:20.580]  their money faster. Can you imagine that? Can no one out there believe that the courts would stoop
[27:20.580 --> 27:25.540]  to such a procedure considering how they're ruling on everything right now? Surely that couldn't be
[27:25.540 --> 27:33.940]  the case, right? Surely our courts are there to protect our rights, not ignore them. Right.
[27:34.980 --> 27:39.140]  You obviously haven't been spending a whole lot of time awake in America. You've been in a coma
[27:39.140 --> 27:46.260]  somewhere, if you actually believe that, because the courts don't function for you and me. They
[27:46.260 --> 27:56.340]  haven't for a very long time. Okay? Haven't at all. But no one is noticing. Why do you think that is?
[27:57.300 --> 28:03.540]  Because they think this couldn't be the way it works in America. This is America. No, folks,
[28:03.540 --> 28:11.940]  you don't live in America anymore. You live in America by name only, but certainly not by law,
[28:11.940 --> 28:18.900]  not by constitution, not by rights do you live in America, because none of that is recognizable
[28:18.900 --> 28:29.220]  here anymore. Who's to blame? Well, first, the people are. We let this happen. We didn't say no.
[28:29.220 --> 28:38.340]  We didn't hold anyone accountable. That's our fault. But who is second in line to make it? I
[28:38.340 --> 28:46.660]  don't know. But who is second in line to make it operate this way? Well, besides the corrupt
[28:46.660 --> 28:55.460]  individuals throughout government, we can honestly blame most of our problems on lawyers. And we can
[28:55.460 --> 29:03.060]  do it without any caveat whatsoever. You know why? Because lawyers are the ones that invented this
[29:03.060 --> 29:10.820]  as it exists today. Lawyers are the ones that have chiseled it out of the mud and crap that they put
[29:10.820 --> 29:18.660]  together to call the justice system. And then they've manipulated it to such a way that they
[29:18.660 --> 29:24.740]  can make it mean anything they want, any time they want, for any purpose they want, in any kind of
[29:24.740 --> 29:32.580]  case that they want. And that's a problem. You know why it's a problem? Because we're the ones
[29:32.580 --> 29:38.100]  paying the price for it. And we're letting them get away with it. And they're stealing everything
[29:38.100 --> 29:45.700]  about us. We're everything. No question. All right, folks. Y'all hang on. We'll be right back. And
[29:45.700 --> 29:52.740]  I'll start taking the phone calls. Calling number 512-646-1984. We will be back momentarily.
[29:52.740 --> 30:05.380]  Y'all hang in there. What happens when bungling burglars bother the wrong bird? They eat crow.
[30:05.380 --> 30:10.340]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll give you the details on a pet store burglary gone wrong in just
[30:10.340 --> 30:16.660]  a moment. Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive
[30:16.660 --> 30:21.940]  database of your personal information. That's creepy. But it doesn't have to be that way.
[30:21.940 --> 30:27.460]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. Startpage doesn't store your IP address,
[30:27.460 --> 30:31.700]  make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[30:31.700 --> 30:37.220]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. Great search results
[30:37.220 --> 30:41.700]  and total privacy. Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[30:42.260 --> 30:47.220]  Bungling burglars bothered the wrong bird when they broke into Hovday's Pet Shop in Coventry,
[30:47.220 --> 30:51.220]  England. They didn't have a wing or a prayer when they were up against the likes of Jack,
[30:51.220 --> 30:55.380]  a self-appointed guard parrot with little patience for the petty purloiners.
[30:55.380 --> 31:00.340]  When the thieves attempted to birdnap him, Jack clawed and pecked them into humiliating retreats.
[31:00.340 --> 31:04.820]  While the burglars bolted with a bag of snakes, a bird, and some fish, they left behind bits of
[31:04.820 --> 31:10.420]  bloody clothing in the wake of the Jack attack. Thanks to the DNA extracted by the winged warrior,
[31:10.420 --> 31:15.060]  it shouldn't be long before police rescue Jack's pet store pals and collar the culprits who will
[31:15.060 --> 31:20.580]  likely eat crow behind bars. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at Catherine
[31:20.580 --> 31:35.780]  Albrecht.com. We want to thank all our listeners who contributed to making the Logos Radio Network
[31:35.780 --> 31:40.420]  fundraiser a success this year. Your support got us close to reaching our goal. Toward the end of
[31:40.420 --> 31:45.220]  January, we received many requests from listeners to extend the deadline to enter into the drawing
[31:45.220 --> 31:51.220]  for the GLOT 42 and the CHL classes. As a result, we are extending the deadline until February 15th.
[31:51.220 --> 31:56.900]  Every $25 donation gets you a chance to win. Help us reach our goal. No donation is too small
[31:56.900 --> 32:01.220]  and everything is appreciated. Please go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details.
[32:02.820 --> 32:06.820]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. In today's America,
[32:06.820 --> 32:10.660]  we live in an us-against-them society. If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.660 --> 32:14.820]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right to
[32:14.820 --> 32:18.820]  travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly,
[32:18.820 --> 32:23.460]  the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn
[32:23.460 --> 32:27.940]  how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig,
[32:27.940 --> 32:31.540]  in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool
[32:31.540 --> 32:35.620]  available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the Rule of
[32:35.620 --> 32:40.260]  Law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and
[32:40.260 --> 32:43.940]  ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas
[32:43.940 --> 32:48.500]  Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:48.500 --> 32:52.420]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your
[32:52.420 --> 32:56.340]  rights with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com. Order your copy today,
[32:56.340 --> 32:59.380]  and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.380 --> 33:10.660]  Live, free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:29.860 --> 33:36.100]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Now, before I start taking calls,
[33:36.100 --> 33:40.100]  the last thing I want to leave you with is a little bit of understanding about what an
[33:40.100 --> 33:47.700]  affidavit is according to the Texas statute. To know what they consider an affidavit,
[33:47.700 --> 33:55.860]  you need to go to the government code, section 312.011. And right there, the very first
[33:55.860 --> 34:04.420]  definition reads as follows. Affidavit means a statement in writing of a fact or facts
[34:05.060 --> 34:12.900]  signed by the party making it, sworn to before an officer authorized to administer oaths,
[34:12.900 --> 34:18.580]  and officially certified to by the officer under his seal of office.
[34:18.580 --> 34:27.060]  That is not what's in a criminal complaint. People can say these are the facts as I
[34:27.060 --> 34:33.220]  understand them, but they can't always say these are the facts as I know them.
[34:35.220 --> 34:42.420]  Okay? If they don't have personal first-hand knowledge, that is not an affidavit.
[34:42.420 --> 34:50.020]  That's simple. And nothing in this definition would give credence to that complaint being
[34:50.020 --> 34:57.060]  an affidavit. Therefore, the court's interpretation of affidavit, meaning the same as criminal
[34:57.060 --> 35:05.620]  complaint under Article 5, Section 17, is dead wrong. Now, there's lots of other stuff
[35:05.620 --> 35:10.580]  that goes hand-in-hand with that that makes it very easy to prove it all the way around.
[35:10.580 --> 35:16.180]  And I covered that in class yesterday. And you missed out if you weren't there. I am
[35:16.180 --> 35:21.940]  currently trying to get the past month or two months' worth of videos updated, cataloged,
[35:22.500 --> 35:28.260]  and edited down to a manageable size. And those that have sent in money to get the videos for
[35:28.260 --> 35:33.780]  that, once I have that done, please bear with me, because that's what I'm going to do.
[35:33.780 --> 35:37.220]  Once I have that done, please bear with me, because these are huge to start with and I've
[35:37.220 --> 35:43.540]  got to get them down to a single video file size that everybody can access. And then for those of
[35:43.540 --> 35:51.380]  you that have gotten it, I will put it up somewhere where you can get logged in to get it and download
[35:51.380 --> 35:57.780]  the ones that you've purchased. But yesterday would clear up a lot of understanding for people
[35:57.780 --> 36:04.020]  about what it takes to go to court and how. Yesterday, we dealt a lot with discussing
[36:04.660 --> 36:10.580]  perspective and how to understand the various points of view that go into a legal issue,
[36:11.140 --> 36:16.100]  and hopefully how to train your mind to look at it from more than one direction.
[36:17.380 --> 36:25.540]  And it takes practice, but anyone can do it if they can just learn to think abstractly outside
[36:25.540 --> 36:30.900]  of the box that the system wants to put you in. When you're sitting there limiting yourself to
[36:30.900 --> 36:37.140]  thinking only within the walls of the box, the system designed, you're kind of stuck.
[36:37.140 --> 36:41.780]  You can't see what other options are available outside the box because they've cut you off
[36:41.780 --> 36:47.940]  inside the box. I always prefer to look at the box from the outside, not the inside.
[36:48.660 --> 36:53.060]  Here's everything you say that locks me into it, but let's look around out here and see if
[36:53.060 --> 36:59.940]  there's anything that says your lock is not enough. Let's see if there's anything out here
[36:59.940 --> 37:06.420]  that disagrees that this side is solid and can't be passed through. Let's see if there's something
[37:06.420 --> 37:12.100]  out here that says there has to be a chink in a certain place in this box every time it's built
[37:12.100 --> 37:20.580]  to let air in, to let light in, to let pressure escape, whatever. It's never set in stone,
[37:20.580 --> 37:28.100]  never, no matter what they tell you. And you know why that is? Because everybody has a
[37:28.100 --> 37:34.500]  different perspective of how something is written and how it means what is written.
[37:36.340 --> 37:40.340]  Now almost always the courts want to look at it from the status point of view.
[37:40.980 --> 37:45.060]  I'll go that far and agree. There are some that don't, but very few.
[37:45.060 --> 37:50.180]  So you have to, whether they do or not. So keep that in mind. And if you're not coming to the
[37:50.180 --> 37:54.740]  classes, shame on you. And if you call me and go, I've been meaning to come into your class,
[37:54.740 --> 37:59.700]  but I got this ticket for I could get there. The first thing I'm going to ask you is how long you've
[37:59.700 --> 38:06.740]  been listening to my show. How long have you known about my class? Because I am not buying this
[38:06.740 --> 38:14.660]  story of I meant to get down there. Cause you didn't mean it enough if you never showed up.
[38:15.300 --> 38:21.380]  I do my best to help you folks, but somewhere along the way, you need to tune in to reality
[38:21.380 --> 38:27.540]  of what's going on around you. Tune out the damn Superbowl and show up to learn how to do this
[38:27.540 --> 38:37.300]  for yourself. Stop being an armchair patriot. We don't need any more of those. We don't need
[38:37.300 --> 38:44.340]  advice givers who have never done a dang thing with anything. That's like these law professors
[38:44.340 --> 38:51.700]  that are out here teaching law, but have never practiced it anywhere. They know it. They have
[38:51.700 --> 38:58.100]  no real world comparison for what they're teaching to what's actually going on. So they can warn
[38:58.100 --> 39:05.140]  their students, Hey, this is what the right way is. And here is what's going on outside these walls.
[39:05.140 --> 39:11.860]  You, the new generation of lawyers are the ones that have to understand what's wrong and work to
[39:11.860 --> 39:19.380]  fix it. They don't do that because they don't know, they don't care what reason they're in.
[39:19.380 --> 39:24.740]  They don't know. They don't care. What reason does it matter if it's not making any difference?
[39:25.940 --> 39:31.700]  So you're going to have to. All right. That being said, let's start taking calls.
[39:31.700 --> 39:34.900]  We're going to go to Max in Texas. Max, what you got?
[39:36.740 --> 39:46.580]  Yes, sir. Mr. Eddie, just calling in to talk about the Dallas County school arm program
[39:46.580 --> 39:53.220]  that my mother got while she was in Illinois. But anyway, my question is,
[39:55.460 --> 40:02.660]  I sent a letter that was very, it was based off of your red light traffic camera tickets. So it
[40:02.660 --> 40:08.180]  had the very same clause at the end, requesting a bunch of information, public information request,
[40:08.180 --> 40:15.540]  boy, or whatever it takes kind of at the bottom. And the only thing I got back from that was
[40:15.540 --> 40:25.940]  a hearing record from the Department of Public Works, apparently. And they're telling us on this
[40:25.940 --> 40:32.740]  hearing record that the proper process for appeal would be to appeal with the municipal court.
[40:32.740 --> 40:38.980]  I'm always hesitant to take fruit from the enemy. So I was wondering if that is the correct thing
[40:38.980 --> 40:42.420]  to do. And we've already looked at the record there in-
[40:42.420 --> 40:47.700]  Okay. Here's their problem. Here's their problem. This is defined as a civil offense, right?
[40:49.540 --> 40:55.140]  Yep. Okay. Did somebody need to explain to me how the municipal court can hear squat?
[40:56.100 --> 41:00.340]  They have no civil jurisdiction of any kind. Their jurisdiction is limited 100%
[41:00.980 --> 41:06.500]  to Class C, fine only criminal offenses. They can't hear civil anything.
[41:06.500 --> 41:12.900]  Yep. And we had written before the time to appear, a special appearance,
[41:14.260 --> 41:19.620]  objecting to any nonjudicial decision-making, and they just went ahead on their merry way and
[41:19.620 --> 41:22.420]  did it anyway. Well, they always do. That's exactly what
[41:22.420 --> 41:26.740]  makes it unconstitutional under the Texas Constitution and the right of due process.
[41:27.860 --> 41:31.780]  So of course, there was no surprise there. I kind of knew they were going to do that.
[41:31.780 --> 41:39.380]  But I guess... Should I take the steps and actually appeal it in a municipal court?
[41:39.380 --> 41:44.340]  What is what gave any court jurisdiction at any point during any of this?
[41:45.700 --> 41:52.180]  There isn't. That's the point. If the only option you have is to go to the municipal court,
[41:52.180 --> 41:56.660]  that's not an option. The municipal court cannot deliver remedy.
[41:56.660 --> 42:00.020]  Well, is there anyone who could deliver remedy, or should we just ignore it?
[42:00.660 --> 42:06.820]  There isn't. The only thing you can do is sue them for what they're doing.
[42:09.380 --> 42:13.380]  The whole thing is a bill of pains and penalties. That's all it is.
[42:13.380 --> 42:21.780]  It is an unconstitutional bill of pains and penalties. Plus the fact they cannot make a
[42:21.780 --> 42:29.940]  civil case out of a state criminal act. The state already criminalized the act
[42:29.940 --> 42:36.500]  of passing a school bus with flashing lights. The city has no authority to legislate in that area.
[42:37.220 --> 42:43.380]  None. Not a zip. And they certainly can't convert what the state defines as a crime
[42:43.940 --> 42:48.980]  into a civil so that they can gain some sort of jurisdictional file.
[42:48.980 --> 42:52.500]  So that they can gain some sort of jurisdictional fine out of it.
[42:55.300 --> 42:58.100]  So in that case, would it be better for us to wait till my...
[42:59.140 --> 43:04.980]  You need to simply file challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance.
[43:07.380 --> 43:10.180]  And I've already done, well, we've already challenged it in writing,
[43:10.180 --> 43:13.380]  but who do I file that with? Officially on the record.
[43:15.300 --> 43:17.060]  There's no case before the court.
[43:17.060 --> 43:19.700]  So I... Well, there is no court. That's the whole point.
[43:20.260 --> 43:23.860]  That's why I said you're going to have to file a case of your own against them.
[43:25.780 --> 43:31.140]  But don't I have to wait for harm to accrue or is their simulation of legal process already harm?
[43:31.140 --> 43:35.220]  Have they sent you a notice that they're going to do something detrimental to your mother?
[43:36.660 --> 43:39.620]  Yep, they certainly have. There you go.
[43:39.620 --> 43:42.100]  The imminent threat of harm has already been taken up.
[43:42.100 --> 43:47.220]  Okay. You can't go after them for money, but you can go after them for injunctive relief.
[43:49.460 --> 43:52.340]  Okay. Hang on, Max. We'll pick this up on the other side, okay?
[43:52.340 --> 44:12.180]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law. We will be right back.
[44:22.820 --> 44:27.140]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:27.700 --> 44:33.620]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.260 --> 44:39.060]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[44:39.060 --> 44:45.300]  principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom,
[44:45.300 --> 44:52.820]  video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit
[44:52.820 --> 44:59.940]  ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.540 --> 45:08.180]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to
[45:08.180 --> 45:14.020]  invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas. I'm Brave
[45:14.020 --> 45:18.260]  New Books and Chase Banks to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own
[45:18.260 --> 45:23.620]  eyes. Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.620 --> 45:27.780]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil,
[45:27.780 --> 45:36.100]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us
[45:36.100 --> 45:44.340]  online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. Don't
[45:44.340 --> 46:10.580]  forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.340 --> 46:35.620]  All right, we are back, and we are talking to Max in Texas. Anyway, Max, what were you saying
[46:35.620 --> 46:40.900]  before we went to break? Well, I was just wondering, you know,
[46:40.900 --> 46:47.700]  how, you know, they're saying that this is the civil thing, and am I just to ignore it?
[46:47.700 --> 46:53.620]  And you said no, that they've already caused harm. No, they've already threatened you with the harm.
[46:53.620 --> 46:59.220]  They've already told you they will take a detrimental action. So you can move for injunctive
[46:59.220 --> 47:07.300]  relief. You just can't sue them for any money for a harm. And what court would we file the
[47:07.300 --> 47:13.220]  injunctive relief? Whatever court, it'd probably have to be the district court, at least. I don't
[47:13.220 --> 47:19.940]  know that the county court has authority to nullify ordinance attempts. They might, but,
[47:20.740 --> 47:25.860]  you know, considering that the ordinance is a city may sit in more than one county,
[47:27.380 --> 47:31.780]  the district court would be the most likely candidate to have jurisdiction over the entire
[47:31.780 --> 47:38.660]  jurisdiction over the entire area covered by the city. And what would be the cause of action there
[47:38.660 --> 47:42.660]  of threatening punishment, you know, without a judicial review? What would be that cause?
[47:42.660 --> 47:47.300]  It's an unconstitutional bill of pains and penalties. Your rights are being violated under
[47:47.300 --> 47:54.100]  the Texas Constitution. Bills of pains and penalties are forbidden. Not to mention that
[47:54.100 --> 48:00.260]  the ordinance is unconstitutional because it converts a state criminal act into an ordinance
[48:00.260 --> 48:07.620]  civil act and charges a fine for it in violation of state law. Thus, the city is attempting to
[48:07.620 --> 48:14.900]  legislate in an area that is solely within the power of the state, not the city, et cetera,
[48:14.900 --> 48:22.500]  et cetera. There's all kinds of things to base it on. Okay. Yeah. And having read the
[48:22.500 --> 48:30.260]  ordinance itself, I mean, it literally has a section in there that says that it is presumed
[48:30.260 --> 48:35.060]  that the registered owner of the vehicle depicted in the recorded image of the school bus stop on
[48:35.060 --> 48:40.820]  violation is the person who committed the school bus stop on violation. Right. It's a presumption
[48:40.820 --> 48:47.300]  of guilt over innocence and it's an administrative punishment without any judicial review.
[48:47.300 --> 48:54.900]  See, the appeal to the municipal court is not judicial because they don't have civil jurisdiction.
[48:56.900 --> 49:02.020]  And guess what their problem is? It isn't administrative either because that is a form of
[49:02.020 --> 49:08.900]  civil. So the appeal to the municipal court is a nullity. There's nothing they can do.
[49:08.900 --> 49:19.780]  There's nothing they can do. So you have no judicial review, thus no remedy for the punishment.
[49:21.700 --> 49:24.980]  That's a bill of pains and penalties in spades.
[49:28.740 --> 49:33.700]  Okay. So we would have to initiate a controversy before the court. Yes.
[49:33.700 --> 49:38.820]  And you're suggesting that that would probably, if it was you, you would say that that would be the
[49:38.820 --> 49:46.180]  district court that you would file that in? Yes. Now you can ask around and say, if you're
[49:46.180 --> 49:52.980]  challenging the constitutionality of a civil city ordinance, what court has jurisdiction?
[49:52.980 --> 49:59.220]  You can call a lawyer or somebody and see if anyone can tell you specifically who that might be.
[49:59.220 --> 50:05.380]  But because most cities, especially large ones, cover more than one county.
[50:06.820 --> 50:11.780]  Okay. They can. They don't necessarily do, but they can. They can sit in more than one county.
[50:11.780 --> 50:17.860]  If a county court ruled on it, their ruling would be valid only within the county
[50:18.740 --> 50:23.380]  where that part of the city sits. The city could enforce it in the other parts that sit in the other
[50:23.380 --> 50:29.940]  counties until someone challenged it there. Okay. And that's why you suggested district.
[50:29.940 --> 50:38.660]  Correct. Okay. And now I've sent her out to the municipal court to run her records.
[50:38.660 --> 50:42.020]  And we've already looked online. There's nothing, there's no cause before the court with her name
[50:42.020 --> 50:45.780]  on it at all. And we didn't- Well, of course not. We already know it's not before a court.
[50:46.820 --> 50:51.220]  Yeah. And we didn't want to initiate one by making some sort of appeal.
[50:51.220 --> 50:58.180]  No, you have to initiate one. It's just not going to be in their control. It's going to be in yours.
[51:00.500 --> 51:05.380]  Okay. Yeah. And I want- It's basically a lawsuit requesting injunctive relief.
[51:08.180 --> 51:12.820]  Now, Eddie, is there anything that in the seminar material where I can go to get
[51:12.820 --> 51:16.500]  some sort of beginnings or skeleton of a- Not for that, no.
[51:16.500 --> 51:21.700]  Okay. Is that something that I would have to have O'Connor's legal forms or something for-
[51:21.700 --> 51:28.420]  It wouldn't hurt. You'd want O'Connor's causes of action. All the legal forms you need in there for
[51:28.420 --> 51:35.620]  filing causes of action are there. However, you can file this federally because what the state is
[51:35.620 --> 51:41.140]  doing is a deprivation of rights under color of law. They are denying your right of due process
[51:41.140 --> 51:46.740]  and they are violating the federal constitution with a bill of pains and penalties. The federal
[51:46.740 --> 51:50.580]  constitution has a prohibition on that just like the state does.
[51:53.060 --> 51:58.180]  And that's separate and apart from the- You can sue them in both at the same time if you want,
[51:58.980 --> 52:03.060]  but they're going to attempt to remove it to the Fed if they can and then get it dismissed.
[52:03.060 --> 52:04.580]  You have to be prepared for that.
[52:04.580 --> 52:09.860]  Okay. But the cause of action, you know, of the pains and penalties is separate and apart from
[52:09.860 --> 52:17.940]  the unconstitutionality of the ordinance itself, or would that be something I would
[52:17.940 --> 52:20.100]  want to include in the brief says Justice Potter?
[52:20.100 --> 52:27.300]  They're one and the same. It's unconstitutional because it's an ordinance pretending to be law
[52:27.300 --> 52:34.020]  it's unconstitutional because it's an ordinance pretending to be law and it's an entirely
[52:34.020 --> 52:38.740]  administrative ordinance with no judicial review that assesses a punishment.
[52:40.500 --> 52:43.540]  That's a bill of pains and penalties by definition.
[52:45.060 --> 52:50.660]  Right. But I'm just saying if I want to attack and on the record the constitutionality of the
[52:50.660 --> 52:58.180]  of the statutes, I'm sorry, of the ordinance, then apparently I have to prove that it creates
[52:58.180 --> 53:04.500]  some sort of absurdity with the state law, which I think that lowering the penalty from criminal
[53:04.500 --> 53:10.980]  and $500 to civil and $300, whereas to protect the children, I'm not buying that. And I think
[53:10.980 --> 53:12.740]  that's absurd.
[53:12.740 --> 53:21.060]  You don't have to make any such assertion. The absurdity of it is irrelevant. It's absurd
[53:21.060 --> 53:28.900]  because it does exactly what it is prohibited from doing. It creates an administrative penalty
[53:28.900 --> 53:37.220]  without judicial review. That's it. That's all the absurdity you need to get it quashed like a
[53:37.220 --> 53:47.140]  cockroach. Okay, and the statute of limitations, I should ignore the 30 days that they gave us to
[53:47.140 --> 53:52.580]  respond and do we have two years because this is a- Their 30 days cannot go forward as long
[53:52.580 --> 53:58.580]  as you've got a suit filed against them for injunctive relief. If it does, then you can sue
[53:58.580 --> 54:05.220]  for damages. So I should probably file for this injunctive relief before the
[54:05.220 --> 54:13.780]  30 days. That would be good, yeah. But at the same time, once they actually move to harm you
[54:13.780 --> 54:20.180]  in any way after that 30 days, since they're acting entirely without jurisdiction, they can't
[54:20.180 --> 54:26.260]  get jurisdiction in this case. The city is now susceptible to a lawsuit, not just injunctive
[54:26.260 --> 54:33.380]  relief. They're now do monetary damages if they harm your mother in any way.
[54:33.380 --> 54:41.140]  If they harm your mother in any way by causing any harm to her monetarily,
[54:41.140 --> 54:46.180]  revocation of a license, suspension, a hold, anything like that.
[54:49.060 --> 54:53.460]  So would it be prudent to send a cease and desist to these parties?
[54:53.460 --> 54:57.940]  If you're going to sue somebody, you have to give them notice to cease and desist first.
[54:57.940 --> 55:06.020]  You have to give them an opportunity to remedy the issue. Okay. All right. I like where that's
[55:06.020 --> 55:11.300]  going. Good deal. And yeah, I've been trying to stay on top of this, but these things kind
[55:11.300 --> 55:18.180]  of move a little slow, but not when you're reading. Yeah, exactly. Okay, Eddie. Well,
[55:18.180 --> 55:22.660]  I'll get out of your ear and let the next caller jump in. I just wanted to catch up with the latest
[55:22.660 --> 55:28.420]  on this and we'll see where it goes. All right, Max. Good luck and get with them.
[55:28.420 --> 55:33.060]  All right. Thanks, Eddie. Bye. Bye-bye. All right. Now we're going to go to Jeff in
[55:33.060 --> 55:38.740]  Mississippi. Jeff, I got about three minutes before the break so I can give you two and a
[55:38.740 --> 55:44.740]  half of that before we have to move forward and put you on hold. Okay. Well, thank you, Eddie.
[55:45.540 --> 55:52.020]  I had a hearing in Mississippi. I just wanted to go over that. Some of it was confusing.
[55:52.020 --> 55:58.660]  I was supposed to have a hearing and a trial, a motion hearing and a trial. Instead, I had a
[55:58.660 --> 56:06.740]  hearing, a motion to withdraw from my attorney and it was granted by the judge. The only thing that
[56:06.740 --> 56:13.540]  was confusing was I bar grieved my attorney several times for not giving me paperwork
[56:14.340 --> 56:20.340]  and she told the judge that I would not meet with her, which was kind of a distraction.
[56:20.340 --> 56:25.300]  It was out of left field. I didn't quite understand that, but she kept hitting that
[56:27.300 --> 56:32.580]  category of me not meeting with her even though she didn't have any paperwork and the judge
[56:32.580 --> 56:39.380]  sided with her and allowed her to withdraw. Well, let me ask a question. When she was lying
[56:39.380 --> 56:46.660]  in open court, under oath no less, because the officers of the court are always presumed to be
[56:46.660 --> 56:53.540]  under oath, she was perpetrating fraud upon the court by making false statements into the record
[56:53.540 --> 57:02.980]  about why she was asking to withdraw. Did you ever object and interject the truth about why
[57:03.540 --> 57:06.660]  she was asking for it versus what she was telling them?
[57:06.660 --> 57:15.540]  I objected and I stated that I sent her an email that I could meet with her
[57:15.540 --> 57:19.940]  and she responded with an email that she would not be free that week.
[57:20.980 --> 57:28.420]  Did you bring any of that to court with you? I offered to read it and actually the attorney
[57:28.420 --> 57:34.100]  claimed that she had it, so I told the judge that she would read that email and she did not.
[57:34.100 --> 57:38.100]  The judge just moved on and unfortunately I didn't catch it. It was kind of slippery.
[57:39.300 --> 57:43.140]  Jeff, you need to start taking no-dos before you go to court.
[57:44.900 --> 57:49.620]  You're missing an awful lot of stuff that if you're wanting to save your bacon from the frying pan,
[57:49.620 --> 57:58.340]  you better start catching. Okay. Did you have any clue she was going to ask for the withdrawal?
[57:58.340 --> 58:04.180]  Yes. I just didn't know about the not needing part. That really caught me off guard.
[58:05.540 --> 58:09.220]  Okay. Well, all right. You knew she was going to ask for a withdrawal,
[58:09.220 --> 58:12.740]  but you didn't check to see what grounds she was going to use to use for it?
[58:13.620 --> 58:20.100]  Yes. All right. Okay. Well, hang on. So I'll be back in a moment with my big oak stick. All right.
[58:20.100 --> 58:28.660]  All right. You hang on. All right, folks. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:29.460 --> 58:33.380]  We need some callers. I've only got one more after we're done with Jeff here and we're going to want
[58:33.380 --> 58:38.100]  somebody to talk to over this next hour. So y'all give us a holler, tell us your issues, your problems,
[58:38.100 --> 58:41.540]  ask us questions, whatever it is you might need. We'll see what we can do.
[58:41.540 --> 58:51.060]  We will be right back. So y'all hang in there. The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:51.060 --> 58:55.060]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:55.780 --> 59:01.540]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the
[59:01.540 --> 59:08.260]  profound meaning of the scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation
[59:08.260 --> 59:15.220]  is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:15.220 --> 59:21.300]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the
[59:21.300 --> 59:26.660]  riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would
[59:26.660 --> 59:32.420]  like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact
[59:32.420 --> 59:42.900]  study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at
[59:42.900 --> 59:50.340]  freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[59:50.340 --> 59:59.780]  logosradionetwork.com. This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist
[59:59.780 --> 01:00:04.980]  updates, online at thelibertybeat.com. I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, February
[01:00:04.980 --> 01:00:14.180]  9th, 2015. Gold is trading at $1,234. Silver at $16.73, and Bitcoin is trading around $222.70.
[01:00:14.180 --> 01:00:22.420]  Today's Bitcoin price brought to you by Express Coin, the fastest, most reliable way to buy Bitcoin.
[01:00:22.420 --> 01:00:27.780]  Buy Bitcoin today at expresscoin.com. Extreme weather from droughts lasting for weeks, and
[01:00:27.780 --> 01:00:33.060]  torrential rainstorms robbing the country of vital crops for food, to snowstorms of 70 inches plus
[01:00:33.060 --> 01:00:38.260]  stopping cities in their tracks. Supporting your family through these difficult times is what
[01:00:38.260 --> 01:00:46.180]  eFoodsDirect does. Go to eFoodsDirect.com, slash Liberty Beat, or call 800-620-5520 to learn more
[01:00:46.180 --> 01:00:51.620]  about food security in a time of crisis. In the news, it's a Good Samaritan story involving
[01:00:51.620 --> 01:00:57.220]  police accountability. Danny Panzella explains. In Louisville, Kentucky, Louis Mossad came to the
[01:00:57.220 --> 01:01:01.620]  aid of a woman being brutally attacked by her husband, Jonathan Osborne, an officer of the
[01:01:01.620 --> 01:01:07.140]  Louisville Metro Police Department, who was arrested on the day of the crime. He was arrested on the
[01:01:07.140 --> 01:01:12.340]  Metro Police Department for 10 years. He had her in a chokehold, and he was standing behind her,
[01:01:12.340 --> 01:01:17.140]  and her feet were barely touching the ground, and I didn't know if he was trying to kill her or what.
[01:01:17.140 --> 01:01:22.020]  Mossad then tackled Osborne, breaking his own wrist, but managing to keep him subdued until
[01:01:22.020 --> 01:01:26.500]  police arrived 10 minutes later. Normally, somebody's quick to grab their phones out and
[01:01:26.500 --> 01:01:31.540]  just record it, but I just can't bear to see somebody being treated like that. Osborne now
[01:01:31.540 --> 01:01:35.700]  faces charges of aggravated battery, domestic battery, resisting law enforcement, criminal
[01:01:35.700 --> 01:01:40.100]  recklessness, and public intoxication. He's currently free on a $30,000 bond.
[01:01:42.820 --> 01:01:48.740]  It happened in Texas on Super Bowl Sunday. Again, here's Danny Panzella. Witnesses to a brutal
[01:01:48.740 --> 01:01:54.420]  arrest by the Austin Police Department are speaking out. He literally bled about a pint of blood,
[01:01:54.420 --> 01:01:59.220]  and he was laying on the ground as if she was dead. Police reportedly attempted to place Luis
[01:01:59.220 --> 01:02:04.180]  Marquez de la Fuente under arrest for public intoxication. The guy wasn't resisting arrest.
[01:02:04.180 --> 01:02:08.580]  He wasn't fighting the cops. His brain had set around so hard, you could hear the skull hitting
[01:02:08.580 --> 01:02:13.620]  the ground. Luis' brother Gabriel, fearing for his brother's life, attempted to intervene and was
[01:02:13.620 --> 01:02:18.820]  also arrested. Police Chief Art Acevedo declines comment on the case, and it remains unclear if
[01:02:18.820 --> 01:02:24.740]  the officers involved remain on duty. For more about police accountability, visit thelibertybeat.com.
[01:02:24.740 --> 01:02:30.020]  The Liberty Beat is brought to you by Cabo Bobs, Southwestern-style burritos, now at two locations
[01:02:30.020 --> 01:02:36.420]  in Austin, 500 East Fenway Boulevard and 2828 Rio Grande Boulevard. Find them online, Cabobobs.com.
[01:02:36.980 --> 01:02:41.700]  Support for the Liberty Beat also comes from the Texas Bitcoin Conference. Hear from speakers
[01:02:41.700 --> 01:02:48.420]  such as Charlie Schramm, Dr. Robert Murphy, Vitalik Buterin, and Catherine Bletch. March 28th and 29th.
[01:02:48.420 --> 01:02:55.940]  Tickets on sale now at texasbitcoinconference.com. This is the Liberty Beat, per Monday, February 9th,
[01:02:55.940 --> 01:03:00.340]  2015. Check out the website at thelibertybeat.com.
[01:03:26.260 --> 01:03:40.500]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:40.500 --> 01:03:44.180]  We are talking with Jeff in Mississippi. All right, Jeff, go ahead.
[01:03:45.940 --> 01:03:53.140]  Okay. Well, at the hearing, I had two large points that I wanted to get out there,
[01:03:53.140 --> 01:03:57.540]  and I sure did. She had me arrested back in October.
[01:03:57.540 --> 01:03:58.260]  She who?
[01:03:58.260 --> 01:04:00.820]  And I, my attorney, I'm sorry.
[01:04:00.820 --> 01:04:02.580]  Your attorney had you arrested?
[01:04:03.700 --> 01:04:09.780]  Yes. And I called into the show and had told you that she had arrested me without a warrant
[01:04:09.780 --> 01:04:16.020]  and without a hearing. And we went over that and I actually had that in email. I had that in writing
[01:04:16.020 --> 01:04:22.020]  that she was going to arrest me, threatening me. And then after she arrested me, I wrote to her
[01:04:22.020 --> 01:04:28.820]  and asked her why she had me arrested. So I had that in writing. And I also had asked her or
[01:04:28.820 --> 01:04:35.300]  requested in writing that she give me my discovery. And she responds that she didn't have my discovery
[01:04:35.300 --> 01:04:41.220]  and that was in writing. And those were my two main points. And I got them out there really good.
[01:04:41.220 --> 01:04:48.180]  I mean, I really bopped her in the chin hard with those two points. So when she came back and kept
[01:04:48.180 --> 01:04:54.580]  saying, or when she said that I didn't meet with her, my response is, well, I did say that I was
[01:04:54.580 --> 01:05:00.260]  free, but she had said that she couldn't meet with me. She wasn't available for the week.
[01:05:00.260 --> 01:05:06.500]  And it just didn't seem like it was that big of a deal. And at the end of the hearing, he granted
[01:05:06.500 --> 01:05:13.300]  her withdrawal based on me not meeting with her. And it just, it was just one of those things where
[01:05:13.300 --> 01:05:21.140]  I wasn't expecting that. So I wanted to get your take on it. Well, once you knew she was asking for
[01:05:21.140 --> 01:05:27.460]  withdrawal, you should have demanded that she inform you of the basis. And then you, or at the
[01:05:27.460 --> 01:05:33.540]  very least, you should have started looking at everything that you communicated with her to try
[01:05:33.540 --> 01:05:39.700]  and figure out why she would be asking to withdraw. Now, you said you filed several bar grievances
[01:05:39.700 --> 01:05:44.340]  against her. What were the basis of the bar grievances? To me, that would be the first thing
[01:05:44.340 --> 01:05:49.940]  I'd want to round up any communications in support of. I bar grieved you because here's the email that
[01:05:49.940 --> 01:05:54.820]  shows my bar grievance is valid. You should have done this. You said you didn't do this. I bar
[01:05:54.820 --> 01:06:00.660]  grieved you. That hurt me when you didn't do that. That's the way I would have handled it.
[01:06:00.660 --> 01:06:07.540]  And anything that I thought at that point would have been useful for me to get under her skin and
[01:06:07.540 --> 01:06:11.620]  to show that she was perpetrating fraud, I'd have taken to court with me and been prepared for.
[01:06:12.180 --> 01:06:16.660]  That's how I would have done it. I would have expected the absolute worst, no matter what,
[01:06:16.660 --> 01:06:21.620]  and dug up everything I had to make sure that whatever came out of her mouth, I could slap her
[01:06:21.620 --> 01:06:30.580]  with. Okay. Got it. Okay. Well, all right. I got half the stuff out there. Now, the judge then
[01:06:30.580 --> 01:06:38.180]  appointed me as my own attorney, which is not that bad. I've done that before. If they want
[01:06:38.180 --> 01:06:44.820]  to continue my case, do they have to get my signature from here on out? Ask that one more time.
[01:06:46.820 --> 01:06:51.220]  I've had a problem in the past with them continuing my case over and over.
[01:06:51.220 --> 01:06:55.380]  Them who? Inside the courts. I'm sorry. Is the court
[01:06:55.380 --> 01:07:02.100]  continuing it or is the opposing counsel asking for the continuum? Actually, it's been my attorney.
[01:07:02.740 --> 01:07:05.220]  So your attorney has been the one continuing it?
[01:07:06.180 --> 01:07:08.660]  Yes. And I've bargained her for that. Okay.
[01:07:09.860 --> 01:07:15.860]  I've got to say, so now that she's out of the way, if they try to continue the case again,
[01:07:15.860 --> 01:07:21.460]  are they going to have to have my signature? That depends upon the basis that they're continuing
[01:07:21.460 --> 01:07:28.660]  it. The court can reset at any time they want to, unfortunately. But normally the court is not
[01:07:28.660 --> 01:07:33.300]  supposed to do that without a request of the parties if there's a set date that's been agreed
[01:07:33.300 --> 01:07:35.700]  to by the parties. Yes.
[01:07:36.420 --> 01:07:44.100]  And if one side requests a continuance, they're required to inform the other side about that
[01:07:44.100 --> 01:07:49.460]  request so that the other side has an opportunity to object. Got it.
[01:07:49.460 --> 01:07:53.620]  Good. Okay. Good.
[01:07:56.580 --> 01:07:58.580]  Okay. Now will they? I don't know,
[01:07:58.580 --> 01:08:03.860]  but they're supposed to. Well, they're sneaky. So I just wanted to get anything.
[01:08:03.860 --> 01:08:05.140]  Wait, wait, wait. Get a foothold.
[01:08:05.140 --> 01:08:08.660]  I'm sorry. They're what? Oh, they're quite sneaky.
[01:08:08.660 --> 01:08:15.220]  And when did this become apparent to you? I think the day I got arrested.
[01:08:15.220 --> 01:08:20.420]  Yeah. And you still are not getting prepared before you show up in this den of thieves
[01:08:20.420 --> 01:08:22.580]  and vipers. Yeah. Yeah.
[01:08:24.260 --> 01:08:28.340]  Okay. All right. Well, that's what I have to work on right now. So I will get to work and
[01:08:28.340 --> 01:08:30.900]  I'll keep you guys posted. All right. Well, good luck.
[01:08:31.860 --> 01:08:33.540]  Thank you. Yes, sir. Bye-bye.
[01:08:34.260 --> 01:08:41.620]  All right. I need some more callers. 512-646-1984. Now we've got Truth Raider. Raider,
[01:08:41.620 --> 01:08:44.420]  what can we do for you? Hey, good evening, Eddie. How are you
[01:08:44.420 --> 01:08:46.340]  doing tonight? I'm doing fine. What's up?
[01:08:47.060 --> 01:08:52.820]  Excellent. Well, I just have to keep calling and reminding you. I have to kind of keep like an
[01:08:52.820 --> 01:08:59.540]  update on what's going on here as far as, well, police trafficking and police patrolling.
[01:09:00.260 --> 01:09:08.900]  I've already seen hide nor hear of them. Somehow this is apparently working to a point because I
[01:09:08.900 --> 01:09:16.900]  rarely anymore see much traffic stops or much activity by police involving people traveling
[01:09:16.900 --> 01:09:24.500]  in traffic. So that's just good news. I think they're getting it.
[01:09:26.340 --> 01:09:30.100]  Well, that's true. Yeah. Yeah. It seems to be. I'm just
[01:09:30.100 --> 01:09:33.700]  an ability. It varies in other parts of the country. I have no idea what's going on in
[01:09:33.700 --> 01:09:38.420]  other places. Apparently it's still a struggle in many other parts of the country, but here
[01:09:38.420 --> 01:09:43.300]  it seems that they're recognizing people's traveling rights here. As a matter of fact,
[01:09:43.300 --> 01:09:50.820]  a couple of people in a group that I attend had confrontations and been accosted by local authorities,
[01:09:51.540 --> 01:09:56.420]  city and sheriff departments here locally, the Portland police and Multnomah County sheriff,
[01:09:56.420 --> 01:10:04.660]  et cetera. They didn't have driver's licenses either. They went through their own version of
[01:10:04.660 --> 01:10:11.060]  the script. I don't know if they did it correctly or not, but it was to the point where the officers
[01:10:11.060 --> 01:10:16.020]  just made sure that their automobile wasn't stolen, made sure that they didn't have warrants or
[01:10:16.020 --> 01:10:21.700]  anything like that. I guess they just used the three pieces of information, name, address,
[01:10:21.700 --> 01:10:27.540]  and date of birth. I guess that worked for them. I don't think they had any photo ID of any kind.
[01:10:28.420 --> 01:10:31.700]  I don't know if they passed them registration. I have no idea on the details,
[01:10:31.700 --> 01:10:36.580]  but it was for apparent infractions for the traffic stopping, something they didn't do.
[01:10:36.580 --> 01:10:44.660]  They got traffic stopped. They just got a ticket and they apparently let them travel on their way
[01:10:44.660 --> 01:10:50.660]  while they let them go. I've had several people, including a friend of mine who was up in Connecticut,
[01:10:50.660 --> 01:10:56.820]  he got pulled over twice, went through the script about not being engaged in commerce or any form of
[01:10:56.820 --> 01:11:01.940]  transportation, and they turn around and let him go. No warning, no nothing, just let him go.
[01:11:01.940 --> 01:11:06.740]  Have you seen this as being a pattern, that this is becoming more frequent?
[01:11:07.700 --> 01:11:13.700]  I don't know yet that it's become a pattern. To become a pattern, we'd have to establish that
[01:11:13.700 --> 01:11:21.300]  the information out there started from an original source and is being applied as required in these
[01:11:21.300 --> 01:11:25.460]  locations where it is to show that the pattern is consistent with the information given.
[01:11:25.460 --> 01:11:31.540]  Okay. More or less. Not being a complete scientific
[01:11:31.540 --> 01:11:35.860]  mind in that regard to statistics, I couldn't tell you the best way to do it. Just for me,
[01:11:35.860 --> 01:11:42.580]  it would be where did it start? How effective has it been? What's been the highs and what's
[01:11:42.580 --> 01:11:46.660]  been the lows and so on and so forth? Now, I will tell you that a friend of mine
[01:11:46.660 --> 01:11:55.620]  is suing the DPS, and I did the review of the video and the commentary as to what laws are being
[01:11:55.620 --> 01:12:01.540]  broken and crimes committed in that video. And it seems the Department of Public Safety here
[01:12:01.540 --> 01:12:07.300]  in Texas is extremely familiar with me, based upon what they told him in response to this,
[01:12:07.780 --> 01:12:14.580]  if I understood him correctly anyway. And the only thing he could say is, after everything
[01:12:14.580 --> 01:12:17.620]  they were telling me, what they were telling me without actually saying it from their own
[01:12:17.620 --> 01:12:25.460]  mouth was they're afraid of you. That would be nice, but I'm not going to hold my breath
[01:12:25.460 --> 01:12:30.580]  if that's the case. But their entire reason for telling him, according to, again, what he told me
[01:12:31.060 --> 01:12:38.740]  is that they don't like what I'm teaching people about how to exert their rights. They don't like
[01:12:38.740 --> 01:12:44.820]  it. They don't like it because it puts the officer in peril, not in danger, in peril.
[01:12:44.820 --> 01:12:50.180]  And there's a difference. Danger of being harmed on the job for being an officer, that's one thing.
[01:12:50.180 --> 01:12:56.980]  But in peril of being caught being a fool, susceptible to a lawsuit, and dragging him's
[01:12:56.980 --> 01:13:02.820]  name and that of his agency through the mud by being stupid, that's what they fear.
[01:13:02.820 --> 01:13:11.140]  That's right. Losing many of the powers and authorities, losing face or whatever
[01:13:11.140 --> 01:13:16.340]  adjective you want to put to it. Yeah, I get that. That could be problematic for them.
[01:13:16.900 --> 01:13:20.740]  Okay, well, as long as you don't have any more callers up on the board here,
[01:13:21.540 --> 01:13:25.860]  I'd like to talk to you about a couple things. And I have three or four questions
[01:13:25.860 --> 01:13:29.700]  if you have time to go through those. You're the only caller I got on the
[01:13:29.700 --> 01:13:33.700]  board right now. So go ahead. Oh, okay. Excellent. Okay. Here's something.
[01:13:35.220 --> 01:13:38.900]  This is just something that philosophically I looked into. I don't know what you think about
[01:13:38.900 --> 01:13:45.060]  this. But for years, we've been told about the new world order. We have to stop the new world
[01:13:45.060 --> 01:13:51.220]  order, the term itself, new world order and what it means. The new world order. I mean, you take
[01:13:51.220 --> 01:13:59.380]  that you take the first two words, the new world. Okay. The new world, in my interpretation,
[01:13:59.380 --> 01:14:06.020]  what it really means is the establishment of the 13 original colonies is the new world.
[01:14:07.300 --> 01:14:12.660]  Now, I believe it's been demonized. The new world order is the order is supposed to be
[01:14:13.220 --> 01:14:19.220]  the establishment of a republic that grants us and gives us a constitution, gives us freedom.
[01:14:19.220 --> 01:14:25.540]  It gives us many of our rights to be expanded like no other republic ever had before,
[01:14:25.540 --> 01:14:33.060]  a total freedom away from the enslavement of the ruling oligarchy or the monarchy of England
[01:14:33.700 --> 01:14:38.500]  and the old world order. But they've taken it and used it as something that is,
[01:14:39.540 --> 01:14:47.620]  you know, something is sinister. Control grid worldwide, George Orwell's 1984, if you will.
[01:14:47.620 --> 01:14:51.860]  Well, the only problem I've got with your analogy, I'm sorry, I don't mean to interrupt
[01:14:51.860 --> 01:14:55.380]  you on your thought process here, but let me clarify something before we go any further
[01:14:55.380 --> 01:15:02.900]  down that train there. The concept of what you're talking about with the original colonies
[01:15:02.900 --> 01:15:09.860]  and a republic and all that had nothing to do with the world. It had to do with America.
[01:15:10.980 --> 01:15:17.300]  Therefore, it would not have been a world concept unless the great experiment of America succeeded
[01:15:17.300 --> 01:15:27.140]  first. So at best, it was meant to be the seed of that type of order, but it wasn't going to be
[01:15:27.140 --> 01:15:33.460]  that border, not in a worldview anyway. OK, now that's my input on what you're saying.
[01:15:34.180 --> 01:15:41.940]  Now, that being said, we know if you read and follow anything in Revelations and other parts
[01:15:41.940 --> 01:15:47.700]  of the Bible, whether you believe or not, that's entirely your call. It's not mine. I'm not here
[01:15:47.700 --> 01:15:51.700]  to judge what you believe and don't believe. That's the entire purpose of free will. You can
[01:15:51.700 --> 01:15:56.820]  do what you want. It's not my job to judge you because you don't believe or do believe or try
[01:15:56.820 --> 01:16:01.220]  to convince you you're wrong, I'm right or anything like that. What you do is up to you. That's
[01:16:01.220 --> 01:16:08.180]  between you and whoever's listening. OK, end of story, as far as I'm concerned. My issue comes
[01:16:08.180 --> 01:16:16.980]  that as a believer in what the Bible tells me, at least to the in a degree, not necessarily
[01:16:16.980 --> 01:16:23.380]  consistent with the exact words of it, but with the concepts of it, that the earth, as we know it,
[01:16:23.380 --> 01:16:31.700]  is not ruled by men. It's ruled by powers and principalities beyond the scope and powers of men
[01:16:31.700 --> 01:16:38.660]  that were told that. So that the evilness and the convert is already here. It's been here from the
[01:16:38.660 --> 01:16:47.060]  beginning. So I don't think that they're attempting to change it into that. I think they're trying to
[01:16:47.060 --> 01:16:54.180]  make it the recognized force that dominates. That's my take. But hang on just a second,
[01:16:54.180 --> 01:17:24.180]  we'll be right back to finish that out. At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals. We cater to beginners in coin collecting, as well as large transactions for investors. We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:24.180 --> 01:17:28.820]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. In addition, we carry popular
[01:17:28.820 --> 01:17:34.100]  young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polymbers. We also offer One World Way,
[01:17:34.100 --> 01:17:39.620]  Mountain House storable foods, Berkey Water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale and more. We
[01:17:39.620 --> 01:17:46.340]  broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept bitcoins as payment. Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:46.340 --> 01:17:52.260]  We're located at 7304 Burnet Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. We're open Monday through
[01:17:52.260 --> 01:17:59.540]  Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.980 --> 01:18:06.900]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.900 --> 01:18:11.700]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.700 --> 01:18:18.340]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. In a
[01:18:18.340 --> 01:18:24.020]  world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jeopardy can
[01:18:24.020 --> 01:18:30.500]  provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products,
[01:18:30.500 --> 01:18:36.020]  most of which we reject. We have come to trust young Jeopardy so much we became a marketing
[01:18:36.020 --> 01:18:43.780]  distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from logosradionetwork.com,
[01:18:43.780 --> 01:18:49.620]  your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize the benefits of
[01:18:49.620 --> 01:18:55.700]  young Jeopardy, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health,
[01:18:55.700 --> 01:19:15.300]  help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now. This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:15.300 --> 01:19:34.660]  Ain't gonna blame me. Don't bore me. Well, ain't gonna fool me with that you came all
[01:19:34.660 --> 01:19:51.300]  trick again. I was blindsided but now I can see your plan. You put the beer in my pocket, took the money from my ass. Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:51.300 --> 01:20:11.300]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plan. You put the beer in my pocket, took the money from my ass.
[01:20:11.300 --> 01:20:31.300]  Ain't gonna drive me with that same old sucker punch. I get it now but then I must have it now too. Back then you had room to move but now you're leaving the ground. Ain't gonna get me with that same old sucker punch.
[01:20:41.300 --> 01:21:03.300]  Well, ain't gonna please me with that same old trick again. You thought you were right but now you got it all wrong. It was a weak moment for me but now you're wrong.
[01:21:03.300 --> 01:21:18.300]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Alright, calling number 512-646-1984. Alright, Raider, let's see if we can get this to continue.
[01:21:18.300 --> 01:21:40.300]  Okay, thank you Eddie. I appreciate the time on them. As long as you don't have colors on the board, we'll talk a little bit and then I'll get to the questions as soon as possible. We'll go ahead and wrap this up. But you know, for me, I'm thinking about it for quite a while. And to me, I believe that that's what the idea of the New World Order was supposed to be.
[01:21:40.300 --> 01:21:57.300]  I believe that it certainly has been demonized, it's been hijacked, and it's been used for nefarious purposes to take over the minds of men and take over all the, I would just say, every facet of life socially in the world.
[01:21:57.300 --> 01:22:16.300]  And it's been used by the international oligarch bankers and used to take over the world and bring back an old world type of order and usher in all of this with a high-tech overlay and using technology to do all this.
[01:22:16.300 --> 01:22:30.300]  Spying, NSA spying, tapping, everything that you do in your life is monitored banking or anything, you use your card, they know what your purchases are, they send you emails and stuff like that for this and that and the other thing to try to advertise other things to you.
[01:22:30.300 --> 01:22:43.300]  As soon as you do that, you log on something on the computer, they send in type of spyware, malware to your computer, all this kind of stuff. So I think that's what's become of it.
[01:22:43.300 --> 01:22:54.300]  I think it's an old world system trying to make its rarest ugly head again with a high-tech overlay and take over our society once again, and that's what I feel what it really is truly.
[01:22:54.300 --> 01:23:04.300]  And the original idea of the new world order was supposed to be something that was good, something that was supposed to give us freedom, something that was going to be new, a new world.
[01:23:04.300 --> 01:23:17.300]  Well, the thing is, as you should be well aware, Bush defined what they consider, not what it is per se, but what they consider the new world order.
[01:23:17.300 --> 01:23:32.300]  And I have never seen a single document of anyone discussing American history where the term new world order ever came into existence until the mid-20th century.
[01:23:32.300 --> 01:23:43.300]  In the 50s and 60s is when that phrase started becoming commonplace in American politics, to the best of my recollection.
[01:23:43.300 --> 01:23:55.300]  And as the 70s, 80s, and 90s progressed, it became more prolific. You would hear it more often. It started out in whispers, and now it's boldly spoken in public.
[01:23:55.300 --> 01:24:04.300]  It's a concept of what they want it to be. I don't know that it was ever visualized to be the republic that we've set up.
[01:24:04.300 --> 01:24:11.300]  It was supposed to be different, but I can't say that the Founding Fathers viewed it as a new world order.
[01:24:11.300 --> 01:24:19.300]  I don't know that I could go as far as to hop on that wagon and agree all the way around on that.
[01:24:19.300 --> 01:24:32.300]  I mean, because that right there, and I'll give you a reason why. The reason for that is it's very difficult for me to accept that one would argue on this hand
[01:24:32.300 --> 01:24:48.300]  for total individual rights and freedoms and then use a concept that suggests social control of everything, which is what the new world order suggests.
[01:24:48.300 --> 01:24:58.300]  Because you don't get order from individuality, at least not the way they see it. That's why they termed it anarchy.
[01:24:58.300 --> 01:25:12.300]  They gave it a meaning that we don't control it. Whereas order is something they've always used to validate their control of any system.
[01:25:12.300 --> 01:25:20.300]  Let's restore order. In other words, let's put it back the way we like it.
[01:25:20.300 --> 01:25:32.300]  So you're right that they're trying to bring something back to the forefront. But what that is, I doubt that mankind is the basis for it.
[01:25:32.300 --> 01:25:37.300]  Right. There's nothing new about it, and there's certainly nothing orderly about it either.
[01:25:37.300 --> 01:25:52.300]  Well, not from a freedom perspective, there's not. But from an organized theft, an organized rounding up and management of people and resources,
[01:25:52.300 --> 01:26:00.300]  yeah, it's pretty organized in that way. It's very ordered, and it's processed to get there.
[01:26:00.300 --> 01:26:07.300]  Pardon me. I believe it was Myron Fagan that, when he had his Illuminati speech, mentioned the term.
[01:26:07.300 --> 01:26:15.300]  That's when I first heard of it in his recording. I think it was in the late 1960s that talked about a new world order and the Illuminati's plan
[01:26:15.300 --> 01:26:24.300]  and what they had for America for the next several decades and bringing this in. Very interesting, very powerful speech he made concerning that.
[01:26:24.300 --> 01:26:32.300]  Well, anyway, that's my thoughts on that. So time is moving on here. So let's go ahead and get to some of these questions.
[01:26:32.300 --> 01:26:36.300]  Well, actually, Raider, I've got a full board now.
[01:26:36.300 --> 01:26:37.300]  Oh, you do?
[01:26:37.300 --> 01:26:38.300]  Yes, I do.
[01:26:38.300 --> 01:26:46.300]  Okay. Well, let's get to a couple of these questions here real quick then. So what can we really do against the government?
[01:26:46.300 --> 01:26:50.300]  If the government becomes physically aggressive, what are we going to really do?
[01:26:50.300 --> 01:26:53.300]  Organize and educate.
[01:26:53.300 --> 01:26:58.300]  Sorry, not organize and educate, but there's no way that we could physically defend ourselves.
[01:26:58.300 --> 01:27:05.300]  Sure there is, but we don't necessarily need to do that if we do the other two.
[01:27:05.300 --> 01:27:16.300]  Organize and educate, one cop against ten people, is he likely to do the thing that would cost him his own life in the process? Doubtful.
[01:27:16.300 --> 01:27:17.300]  No.
[01:27:17.300 --> 01:27:24.300]  And how many to one do we outnumber those that believe they control us?
[01:27:24.300 --> 01:27:35.300]  Quite a bit. Yeah, I've seen the facts and figures on that. But they're very covertly trying to come together with other governments and other militaries.
[01:27:35.300 --> 01:27:44.300]  Well, true. But regardless of that, it's not like that entire set of armies is going to be just in America.
[01:27:44.300 --> 01:27:48.300]  They're trying to control the rest of the planet too.
[01:27:48.300 --> 01:27:49.300]  Okay.
[01:27:49.300 --> 01:27:53.300]  So they're outnumbered no matter how you put it.
[01:27:53.300 --> 01:28:03.300]  The only question that remains is how many of the people that aren't on their side will stand on ours. That's always the question.
[01:28:03.300 --> 01:28:12.300]  The only way they win is if they can outnumber and overpower us and take it.
[01:28:12.300 --> 01:28:18.300]  Right. They're taking quite a long time. Those people have been aware of us. It's really slowed down quite a bit.
[01:28:18.300 --> 01:28:28.300]  Exactly. Because at least here in America, it's not a free ride. Here the means to defend ourselves against them still exists.
[01:28:28.300 --> 01:28:38.300]  Right or wrong in their eyes, we can still do it. That's why they work so hard for gun control and to prevent us from having the same kind of weapons they have.
[01:28:38.300 --> 01:28:45.300]  Anything they can do to limit our ability to protect ourselves from them, they've tried to do.
[01:28:45.300 --> 01:28:53.300]  Right off the bat, the American people should have stood up in unison and started hanging people on the front of the courthouse.
[01:28:53.300 --> 01:28:57.300]  There shouldn't have been any debate about this.
[01:28:57.300 --> 01:29:03.300]  Right. No, we can't do that either, though. We've lowered ourselves to their standards if we were…
[01:29:03.300 --> 01:29:08.300]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. I completely disagree.
[01:29:08.300 --> 01:29:15.300]  I do not lower myself to the standards of the thief that breaks into my home killing him in self-defense.
[01:29:15.300 --> 01:29:24.300]  I do not lower myself to the level of the thief that would rob me at an ATM and take my money by defending myself.
[01:29:24.300 --> 01:29:30.300]  That's a misconception. That is not the way it works.
[01:29:30.300 --> 01:29:33.300]  Well, then I agree with you against somebody who's going to hold you up or something.
[01:29:33.300 --> 01:29:38.300]  Well, that's what they're doing. They're just doing it through what they call their legal process.
[01:29:38.300 --> 01:29:43.300]  Their legal process is the only one judging our actions in that regard to be wrong.
[01:29:43.300 --> 01:29:51.300]  Our actions would not be immoral and unjust in any way. They would be vindicated for that.
[01:29:51.300 --> 01:30:00.300]  But hang on, Raider. All right, folks. We'll be right back after this break, so y'all hang in. Callers, I'll get y'all when we return.
[01:30:00.300 --> 01:30:05.300]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, Social Security number, and date of birth.
[01:30:05.300 --> 01:30:08.300]  But you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:30:08.300 --> 01:30:12.300]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:12.300 --> 01:30:19.300]  Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:19.300 --> 01:30:22.300]  That's creepy. But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:22.300 --> 01:30:25.300]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:25.300 --> 01:30:30.300]  Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, or use tracking cookies.
[01:30:30.300 --> 01:30:32.300]  And they're third-party certified.
[01:30:32.300 --> 01:30:36.300]  If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:36.300 --> 01:30:39.300]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:39.300 --> 01:30:42.300]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.300 --> 01:30:45.300]  Forms, forms, forms. They're everywhere.
[01:30:45.300 --> 01:30:49.300]  But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it.
[01:30:49.300 --> 01:30:56.300]  I only blank spaces on forms all the time, or I write N slash A for not applicable, and usually nobody notices or cares.
[01:30:56.300 --> 01:31:03.300]  I never give my Social Security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement.
[01:31:03.300 --> 01:31:08.300]  And I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually want them to call me.
[01:31:08.300 --> 01:31:09.300]  And that's pretty rare.
[01:31:09.300 --> 01:31:14.300]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:31:14.300 --> 01:31:18.300]  It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier the more you do it.
[01:31:18.300 --> 01:31:23.300]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:32.300 --> 01:31:37.300]  We want to thank all our listeners who contributed to making the Logos Radio Network Fundraiser a success this year.
[01:31:37.300 --> 01:31:39.300]  Your support got us close to reaching our goal.
[01:31:39.300 --> 01:31:44.300]  Toward the end of January, we received many requests from listeners to extend the deadline
[01:31:44.300 --> 01:31:47.300]  to enter into the drawing for the GLOP 42 and the CHL classes.
[01:31:47.300 --> 01:31:51.300]  As a result, we are extending the deadline until February 15.
[01:31:51.300 --> 01:31:54.300]  Every $25 donation gets you a chance to win.
[01:31:54.300 --> 01:31:58.300]  Help us reach our goal. No donation is too small, and everything is appreciated.
[01:31:58.300 --> 01:32:01.300]  Please go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details.
[01:32:01.300 --> 01:32:06.300]  At HempUSA.org, we offer chemical-free products to people around the world,
[01:32:06.300 --> 01:32:10.300]  detoxifying, self-healing, while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:32:10.300 --> 01:32:16.300]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest selling product, Micro Plant Powder.
[01:32:16.300 --> 01:32:23.300]  Our Micro Plant Powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc, and silica to help rebuild the immune system
[01:32:23.300 --> 01:32:25.300]  and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:32:25.300 --> 01:32:30.300]  Micro Plant Powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:32:30.300 --> 01:32:34.300]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at HempUSA.org.
[01:32:34.300 --> 01:32:38.300]  And remember, all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:32:38.300 --> 01:32:43.300]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality, and rapid shipping anywhere.
[01:32:43.300 --> 01:32:47.300]  And we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:32:47.300 --> 01:32:57.300]  Please visit us at HempUSA.org or call 908-691-2608. That's 908-691-2608.
[01:32:57.300 --> 01:33:04.300]  See what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you at HempUSA.org.
[01:33:04.300 --> 01:33:13.300]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:13.300 --> 01:33:27.300]  Thank you very much.
[01:33:43.300 --> 01:33:47.300]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:47.300 --> 01:33:49.300]  All right, Raider, I'm sorry.
[01:33:49.300 --> 01:33:53.300]  I've got a full board here and a half an hour to finish this up with these folks.
[01:33:53.300 --> 01:33:56.300]  So I'm going to let you save your questions for the next round.
[01:33:56.300 --> 01:34:01.300]  I'm going to take these first-time callers I got up here, starting with Scott in Texas.
[01:34:01.300 --> 01:34:04.300]  Scott, what can I do for you?
[01:34:04.300 --> 01:34:06.300]  Well, I guess you're going to beat me up, too.
[01:34:06.300 --> 01:34:10.300]  It's kind of hard to follow New World Order,
[01:34:10.300 --> 01:34:14.300]  but you told me to file an injunctive relief, and I didn't think I had standing,
[01:34:14.300 --> 01:34:21.300]  and I thought that the people who did have standing would do it, and they didn't.
[01:34:21.300 --> 01:34:32.300]  So now the question I asked you was the Commissioner's Court set a redistricting date that's not allowed by law.
[01:34:32.300 --> 01:34:40.300]  So they eliminated some JPs, and so the offices that got eliminated, rather than suing them,
[01:34:40.300 --> 01:34:45.300]  the Commissioners made new jobs for them so that now they're still getting their same paychecks,
[01:34:45.300 --> 01:34:50.300]  so everything's good. They didn't really care about their constituents.
[01:34:50.300 --> 01:34:57.300]  Well, the problem is, as county officers, anyone in the county should have standing to prevent it
[01:34:57.300 --> 01:35:01.300]  if they're violating the Texas Constitution or laws.
[01:35:01.300 --> 01:35:09.300]  Well, you know, I found that out in 2006, but the problem is the statute,
[01:35:09.300 --> 01:35:14.300]  or the time has run to file for injunctive relief.
[01:35:14.300 --> 01:35:18.300]  So there's no relief that can be sought because they've already had the new elections
[01:35:18.300 --> 01:35:20.300]  and got new people in and all that.
[01:35:20.300 --> 01:35:23.300]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:35:23.300 --> 01:35:27.300]  When did this happen?
[01:35:27.300 --> 01:35:31.540]  I think the effective date was in July of 2014.
[01:35:31.540 --> 01:35:35.180]  Why do you think that the statute of limitations
[01:35:35.180 --> 01:35:37.740]  has run on a violation of law
[01:35:37.740 --> 01:35:39.980]  that also violates the Constitution?
[01:35:41.580 --> 01:35:44.420]  Well, because the, because if,
[01:35:45.860 --> 01:35:50.860]  because the, not the violation the statute has,
[01:35:51.860 --> 01:35:53.660]  that was my question for you is,
[01:35:53.660 --> 01:35:55.380]  I don't think that the statute of limitations
[01:35:55.380 --> 01:36:00.380]  has run for a judgment of, or was it a termination
[01:36:03.020 --> 01:36:04.260]  when you ask the court to say,
[01:36:04.260 --> 01:36:05.700]  okay, what does the law mean?
[01:36:07.180 --> 01:36:08.520]  A declaratory judgment.
[01:36:09.440 --> 01:36:11.220]  Okay, a declaratory judgment.
[01:36:12.120 --> 01:36:13.900]  But injunctive relief is out
[01:36:13.900 --> 01:36:16.860]  because it's more than 30 days
[01:36:16.860 --> 01:36:19.020]  and they've already held the elections,
[01:36:19.020 --> 01:36:19.860]  they've already gotten-
[01:36:19.860 --> 01:36:23.700]  No, you can sue to have that removed.
[01:36:23.700 --> 01:36:25.820]  The injunctive relief can be requested
[01:36:25.820 --> 01:36:28.540]  to stop them from assuming these positions
[01:36:28.540 --> 01:36:31.700]  and making this redistricting happen.
[01:36:31.700 --> 01:36:34.780]  You can basically put it on rollback.
[01:36:38.340 --> 01:36:40.100]  If it was illegal, it doesn't,
[01:36:40.100 --> 01:36:42.880]  fraud and that legality of doing that
[01:36:42.880 --> 01:36:45.300]  doesn't get better because of time.
[01:36:47.980 --> 01:36:49.740]  Okay, but here's the problem.
[01:36:49.740 --> 01:36:51.860]  Since they, the effective date
[01:36:51.860 --> 01:36:54.580]  should have been January 1st, 2016.
[01:36:54.580 --> 01:36:55.420]  The law is clear.
[01:36:55.420 --> 01:36:58.620]  It says that it'll be the first even,
[01:36:58.620 --> 01:37:01.340]  first day of the first even-numbered year.
[01:37:01.340 --> 01:37:03.020]  That'll be the effective date.
[01:37:03.020 --> 01:37:04.620]  Had that been the effective date,
[01:37:05.860 --> 01:37:06.880]  there wouldn't have been anything.
[01:37:06.880 --> 01:37:08.780]  But now they've passed a budget
[01:37:08.780 --> 01:37:13.020]  that includes funding for these new offices
[01:37:13.020 --> 01:37:17.740]  and they've had elections so that new people are in office,
[01:37:17.740 --> 01:37:19.160]  their people are in office.
[01:37:19.160 --> 01:37:23.120]  So, you know, I screwed the fix
[01:37:23.120 --> 01:37:24.880]  because I didn't file the injunctive relief
[01:37:24.880 --> 01:37:26.640]  when you told me to.
[01:37:26.640 --> 01:37:29.600]  But I would like to get a declaratory judgment
[01:37:30.880 --> 01:37:32.960]  where a court says that, yes,
[01:37:32.960 --> 01:37:35.240]  the effective date should have been January 1st.
[01:37:35.240 --> 01:37:37.360]  And I'm thinking that if you ask the court
[01:37:37.360 --> 01:37:39.800]  for a declaratory judgment, there is no-
[01:37:39.800 --> 01:37:42.500]  Why does the date have to be January 1st?
[01:37:44.720 --> 01:37:47.160]  The Texas election law,
[01:37:47.160 --> 01:37:50.000]  because in 1983, the voters went to the polls
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:51.960]  and amended the Texas Constitution
[01:37:51.960 --> 01:37:54.640]  and took the authority away from the commission's court
[01:37:54.640 --> 01:37:57.280]  to just eliminate constables and JPs
[01:37:57.280 --> 01:37:58.440]  whenever they wanted to.
[01:38:01.200 --> 01:38:03.080]  What does that have to do with the date?
[01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:11.000]  Okay, because Texas election law says under redistricting
[01:38:11.640 --> 01:38:16.640]  that the first, the effective date of the redistricting
[01:38:16.640 --> 01:38:21.480]  will be January 1st of the next even-numbered year,
[01:38:23.160 --> 01:38:26.240]  which would have been January 1st, 2016.
[01:38:26.240 --> 01:38:27.080]  Okay.
[01:38:28.200 --> 01:38:30.720]  And they set it to an earlier date,
[01:38:30.720 --> 01:38:33.680]  but the only provision to set it in the earlier date
[01:38:33.680 --> 01:38:37.640]  is if the redistricting bisects or cuts
[01:38:37.640 --> 01:38:39.160]  one of the voting boxes in half
[01:38:39.160 --> 01:38:41.000]  so it's in two different precincts.
[01:38:41.960 --> 01:38:43.160]  That didn't happen here.
[01:38:43.160 --> 01:38:44.000]  Okay.
[01:38:46.200 --> 01:38:47.920]  So they just arbitrarily said,
[01:38:47.920 --> 01:38:52.480]  okay, well, it's effective in July, 2014.
[01:38:52.480 --> 01:38:53.520]  So now we're gonna have,
[01:38:53.520 --> 01:38:56.000]  we're gonna throw out all these offices
[01:38:56.000 --> 01:38:58.600]  and we're gonna have a new election for new people.
[01:39:01.560 --> 01:39:02.400]  Okay.
[01:39:06.280 --> 01:39:09.720]  So what I would like to do is go to the court now
[01:39:09.720 --> 01:39:13.440]  because there is, I don't think the chances,
[01:39:13.440 --> 01:39:15.560]  if you petition for injunctive relief
[01:39:15.560 --> 01:39:16.960]  and had all that rolled back,
[01:39:16.960 --> 01:39:18.720]  I mean, you talk about one heck of a mess.
[01:39:18.720 --> 01:39:22.440]  That would, any arrest warrant or search warrant
[01:39:22.440 --> 01:39:25.800]  or anything that those judges had signed would be invalid.
[01:39:28.040 --> 01:39:33.040]  Well, but the declaratory judgment that you're asking for
[01:39:33.920 --> 01:39:35.840]  is not an action to roll it back.
[01:39:35.840 --> 01:39:37.360]  It's just a ruling that says,
[01:39:37.360 --> 01:39:39.760]  yeah, your theory is correct
[01:39:39.760 --> 01:39:43.520]  until you actually do something to roll that back
[01:39:43.520 --> 01:39:47.800]  or bring it to the forefront and get it declared illegal.
[01:39:47.800 --> 01:39:49.160]  Nothing changes.
[01:39:50.800 --> 01:39:53.200]  Yes, it does change because then you go,
[01:39:53.200 --> 01:39:55.480]  you go in and you sit down at Commissioner's Court,
[01:39:55.480 --> 01:39:56.800]  you look at the county judge in the eye
[01:39:56.800 --> 01:39:59.800]  and you say, you broke the law, you should step down.
[01:39:59.800 --> 01:40:01.960]  And he's gonna laugh at you.
[01:40:01.960 --> 01:40:03.400]  And that's fine.
[01:40:03.400 --> 01:40:08.400]  But you do know that you can remove county officers, right?
[01:40:13.920 --> 01:40:15.160]  No, there is no role.
[01:40:15.160 --> 01:40:19.240]  I'm not aware of any role, recall provision.
[01:40:19.240 --> 01:40:20.560]  It's not a recall.
[01:40:20.560 --> 01:40:22.000]  County officer.
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:25.360]  You can petition to have any county officer
[01:40:25.360 --> 01:40:28.480]  removed from office for dereliction of duty,
[01:40:28.480 --> 01:40:33.120]  violation of the duties of his office, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:40:33.120 --> 01:40:36.280]  Removal of county officers.
[01:40:36.280 --> 01:40:37.120]  Look it up.
[01:40:39.240 --> 01:40:41.880]  The attorney general has already written two opinions
[01:40:41.880 --> 01:40:44.880]  that our district attorney violated provisions
[01:40:44.880 --> 01:40:46.600]  of the Public Information Act.
[01:40:46.600 --> 01:40:50.760]  He's written signed by the AG.
[01:40:52.200 --> 01:40:53.200]  Nobody cares.
[01:40:55.200 --> 01:40:59.880]  Well, an opinion is not something that goes to court.
[01:40:59.880 --> 01:41:04.880]  Somebody's gotta take action on it, right?
[01:41:10.320 --> 01:41:11.160]  Right?
[01:41:12.200 --> 01:41:15.400]  It doesn't, the opinion isn't gonna do anything by itself.
[01:41:18.760 --> 01:41:22.440]  Look in chapter 87 of the Local Government Code.
[01:41:22.440 --> 01:41:27.440]  Okay.
[01:41:31.040 --> 01:41:33.480]  Okay, you can remove a district attorney,
[01:41:33.480 --> 01:41:36.040]  county attorney, county judge, county commissioner,
[01:41:36.040 --> 01:41:38.840]  county clerk, district clerk, district and county clerk,
[01:41:38.840 --> 01:41:41.600]  county treasurer, sheriff, county surveyor,
[01:41:41.600 --> 01:41:44.200]  county tax assessor, collector, a constable,
[01:41:44.200 --> 01:41:47.360]  a justice of the peace, a member of the board of trustees
[01:41:47.360 --> 01:41:49.120]  of an independent school district,
[01:41:49.120 --> 01:41:52.560]  and a county officer not otherwise named by this section
[01:41:52.560 --> 01:41:55.040]  whose office is created under the constitution
[01:41:55.040 --> 01:41:57.320]  or other law of this state.
[01:41:57.320 --> 01:41:59.360]  That's who can be removed.
[01:42:02.680 --> 01:42:03.520]  Okay.
[01:42:03.520 --> 01:42:05.800]  You're the man, I call you up and you indict me
[01:42:05.800 --> 01:42:07.480]  and tell me it's my job.
[01:42:07.480 --> 01:42:09.480]  Well, it is your job.
[01:42:09.480 --> 01:42:10.320]  I understand.
[01:42:12.240 --> 01:42:14.800]  I just wish I wasn't like the Lone Ranger out here.
[01:42:14.800 --> 01:42:16.480]  Well, that part I can't help you with.
[01:42:16.480 --> 01:42:18.000]  You're gonna have to find your own tanto
[01:42:18.000 --> 01:42:19.320]  because they gotta be from your county
[01:42:19.320 --> 01:42:20.640]  to be of any use to you.
[01:42:21.520 --> 01:42:23.080]  Well, keep holding us accountable
[01:42:23.080 --> 01:42:25.680]  and reminding us that it's our job to do it.
[01:42:25.680 --> 01:42:26.520]  I'll try.
[01:42:26.520 --> 01:42:27.720]  Because it ain't easy.
[01:42:27.720 --> 01:42:28.680]  I know it's not.
[01:42:28.680 --> 01:42:31.520]  Eddie, Eddie, thank you very much for your time.
[01:42:31.520 --> 01:42:32.360]  Appreciate it.
[01:42:32.360 --> 01:42:33.180]  Yes, sir.
[01:42:33.180 --> 01:42:34.020]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:42:34.020 --> 01:42:35.520]  Bye-bye. Bye-bye.
[01:42:35.520 --> 01:42:39.360]  All right, now we're gonna go to Eddie in Texas
[01:42:39.360 --> 01:42:41.200]  and no, not me.
[01:42:41.200 --> 01:42:43.200]  All right, Eddie, what can we do for you?
[01:42:43.200 --> 01:42:46.200]  Are you talking with me, Eddie?
[01:42:46.200 --> 01:42:47.880]  Well, I'm trying to.
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:49.840]  Okay, yeah.
[01:42:51.160 --> 01:42:52.880]  I'm a published author.
[01:42:52.880 --> 01:42:55.240]  I've written All Proud Americans.
[01:42:55.240 --> 01:42:57.720]  Take it, you need it, your reality check.
[01:42:58.720 --> 01:43:01.920]  Eddie, I mean, Randy Kelton contributed
[01:43:01.920 --> 01:43:05.320]  his Frog Park conspiracy memorandum.
[01:43:05.320 --> 01:43:06.920]  That's in that book.
[01:43:06.920 --> 01:43:09.680]  But the reason I'm calling is because
[01:43:09.680 --> 01:43:11.720]  I've let my drivers like me know
[01:43:11.720 --> 01:43:15.440]  because I've let my driver's license go 12 years ago.
[01:43:15.440 --> 01:43:17.080]  Let it expire.
[01:43:17.080 --> 01:43:20.480]  And a county municipal court judge here
[01:43:20.480 --> 01:43:24.040]  had dismissed every ticket I ever had in his precinct
[01:43:24.040 --> 01:43:25.760]  because I found public record
[01:43:25.760 --> 01:43:29.000]  and constructive legal notice on public record.
[01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  But recently, Brooks of the DPS had stopped me three times.
[01:43:34.880 --> 01:43:36.400]  Okay, well, hang on just a second.
[01:43:36.400 --> 01:43:38.600]  We got a break coming up here, Eddie,
[01:43:38.600 --> 01:43:41.680]  and I'll pick you up when we get to the other side, okay?
[01:43:41.680 --> 01:43:42.520]  Okay.
[01:43:42.520 --> 01:43:43.840]  All right, so hang on just a minute.
[01:43:43.840 --> 01:43:46.560]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:46.560 --> 01:43:49.360]  We are coming up on our last segment for the show,
[01:43:49.360 --> 01:43:50.920]  and y'all hang in there,
[01:43:50.920 --> 01:43:53.520]  and let us get this concluded for this Monday night.
[01:43:53.520 --> 01:43:55.720]  We will be right back, so y'all hold on.
[01:44:00.440 --> 01:44:02.840]  You feel tired when talking about important topics
[01:44:02.840 --> 01:44:04.200]  like money and politics?
[01:44:04.200 --> 01:44:05.040]  Sorry!
[01:44:05.040 --> 01:44:06.760]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution
[01:44:06.760 --> 01:44:07.800]  or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.800 --> 01:44:08.640]  What?
[01:44:08.640 --> 01:44:10.840]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease
[01:44:10.840 --> 01:44:13.080]  known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.080 --> 01:44:14.920]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt,
[01:44:14.920 --> 01:44:16.560]  and like millions of other Americans,
[01:44:16.560 --> 01:44:19.400]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.400 --> 01:44:22.160]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease
[01:44:22.160 --> 01:44:25.400]  is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.400 --> 01:44:27.480]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans
[01:44:27.480 --> 01:44:30.480]  at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.480 --> 01:44:32.280]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[01:44:32.280 --> 01:44:33.960]  and thousands of other foxaholics
[01:44:33.960 --> 01:44:36.440]  suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.440 --> 01:44:39.080]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading
[01:44:39.080 --> 01:44:40.840]  and watching educational documentaries
[01:44:40.840 --> 01:44:43.320]  without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.320 --> 01:44:46.440]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[01:44:46.440 --> 01:44:50.640]  then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.640 --> 01:44:54.840]  or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.840 --> 01:44:56.440]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products
[01:44:56.440 --> 01:44:58.240]  may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:44:58.240 --> 01:45:01.360]  and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.360 --> 01:45:04.440]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.440 --> 01:45:07.760]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[01:45:07.760 --> 01:45:11.360]  the affordable, easy to understand, four CD course
[01:45:11.360 --> 01:45:15.800]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.800 --> 01:45:19.480]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.480 --> 01:45:20.960]  If you don't have a lawyer,
[01:45:20.960 --> 01:45:23.360]  know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.360 --> 01:45:26.320]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course
[01:45:26.320 --> 01:45:28.240]  and now you can too.
[01:45:28.240 --> 01:45:31.360]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.360 --> 01:45:34.760]  with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:34.760 --> 01:45:36.720]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[01:45:36.720 --> 01:45:39.240]  you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.240 --> 01:45:41.320]  about the principles and practices
[01:45:41.320 --> 01:45:43.680]  that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.680 --> 01:45:46.960]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[01:45:46.960 --> 01:45:51.320]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics,
[01:45:51.320 --> 01:45:52.520]  and much more.
[01:45:52.520 --> 01:45:56.720]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:56.720 --> 01:46:00.680]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:00.680 --> 01:46:22.120]  All right, folks, we are back and just a quick reminder,
[01:46:22.120 --> 01:46:25.840]  we have the fundraiser extended until the middle of February,
[01:46:25.840 --> 01:46:27.040]  February 15th.
[01:46:27.040 --> 01:46:31.320]  So please, if you haven't donated to the network,
[01:46:31.320 --> 01:46:32.400]  please do so.
[01:46:33.480 --> 01:46:35.520]  If you have any extra donations to the network,
[01:46:35.520 --> 01:46:36.360]  please do so.
[01:46:36.360 --> 01:46:39.280]  We're still trying to reach our goal of enough money
[01:46:39.280 --> 01:46:41.200]  to see us through the rest of the year.
[01:46:41.200 --> 01:46:43.280]  So please be generous where you can.
[01:46:43.280 --> 01:46:44.920]  Any amount will help,
[01:46:44.920 --> 01:46:48.720]  but every $25 gets you an entry into the drawing
[01:46:48.720 --> 01:46:49.560]  for the pistol.
[01:46:49.560 --> 01:46:53.000]  So please, if you haven't, please do so.
[01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:57.600]  If you know somebody that could and should, please do so.
[01:46:57.600 --> 01:46:58.720]  All right, that being said,
[01:46:58.720 --> 01:47:00.600]  let's get back to the subject
[01:47:00.600 --> 01:47:02.080]  of whatever Eddie's discussing here.
[01:47:02.080 --> 01:47:03.080]  All right, go ahead.
[01:47:04.360 --> 01:47:07.560]  Yes, it was a traffic violation,
[01:47:07.560 --> 01:47:09.480]  alleged traffic violation.
[01:47:09.480 --> 01:47:13.120]  And it was the second one from this officer
[01:47:13.120 --> 01:47:15.680]  and all of the other ones in precinct two,
[01:47:15.680 --> 01:47:19.040]  Montgomery County, have been dismissed by Trey Spikes.
[01:47:19.040 --> 01:47:24.040]  When I got the citation, I returned it refused for cause,
[01:47:24.520 --> 01:47:26.400]  challenged jurisdiction
[01:47:26.400 --> 01:47:30.440]  and requested an Article III common law court.
[01:47:30.440 --> 01:47:32.840]  Well, that never happened.
[01:47:32.840 --> 01:47:35.480]  They sent me an arraignment notice.
[01:47:35.480 --> 01:47:37.280]  I went to arraignment.
[01:47:37.280 --> 01:47:40.400]  The judge was not present.
[01:47:40.400 --> 01:47:45.160]  He never convened the court of no record.
[01:47:45.160 --> 01:47:47.880]  So the bailiff called names
[01:47:47.880 --> 01:47:51.000]  and sent everyone into the side room
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:55.880]  who made a deal with the prosecutor and the clerk.
[01:47:55.880 --> 01:47:57.640]  And they called me in.
[01:47:57.640 --> 01:48:00.440]  I told them I was there by special visitation
[01:48:00.440 --> 01:48:02.360]  and general appearance
[01:48:02.360 --> 01:48:04.800]  and that I challenged jurisdiction.
[01:48:04.800 --> 01:48:06.560]  He was a court of no record.
[01:48:06.560 --> 01:48:08.080]  He couldn't possibly have jurisdiction
[01:48:08.080 --> 01:48:10.200]  because once it's challenged,
[01:48:10.200 --> 01:48:12.720]  has to be proven on the record.
[01:48:12.720 --> 01:48:16.360]  He huffed and puffed and said he had jurisdiction
[01:48:16.360 --> 01:48:20.320]  and that he was going to take it to trial.
[01:48:20.320 --> 01:48:21.520]  None of them I wanted to dismiss,
[01:48:21.520 --> 01:48:25.160]  but I wanted to try by jury if I had to have one.
[01:48:25.160 --> 01:48:30.160]  So now, do I need a declaratory judgment
[01:48:30.880 --> 01:48:33.680]  and then sue the judge for neglect of duty,
[01:48:33.680 --> 01:48:37.160]  the prosecutor for acting without jurisdiction?
[01:48:37.160 --> 01:48:38.400]  What should I do?
[01:48:38.400 --> 01:48:41.480]  Well, first off, you can't sue a prosecutor.
[01:48:41.480 --> 01:48:43.800]  Whoa, hold on, hold on.
[01:48:43.800 --> 01:48:46.280]  And he wasn't there for the arraignment.
[01:48:46.280 --> 01:48:48.120]  Okay, hold on.
[01:48:48.120 --> 01:48:52.120]  You can't sue a prosecutor, period.
[01:48:52.120 --> 01:48:54.600]  Can't do it, all right?
[01:48:54.600 --> 01:48:56.320]  You can only sue a judge
[01:48:56.320 --> 01:49:00.120]  if you can show the judge acted improperly
[01:49:00.120 --> 01:49:03.360]  and without jurisdiction to act.
[01:49:04.560 --> 01:49:06.120]  Okay. All right?
[01:49:06.120 --> 01:49:09.920]  So if he convenes a trial against me,
[01:49:09.920 --> 01:49:12.160]  he's acting without jurisdiction.
[01:49:12.160 --> 01:49:13.560]  Based on what grounds?
[01:49:13.560 --> 01:49:16.400]  That there was never an arraignment.
[01:49:20.520 --> 01:49:21.360]  Okay.
[01:49:23.040 --> 01:49:26.960]  And did he ask for the entering of a plea at trial?
[01:49:28.800 --> 01:49:30.560]  I haven't been to trial yet.
[01:49:30.560 --> 01:49:32.160]  That's coming up April 8th.
[01:49:32.160 --> 01:49:33.000]  Okay.
[01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:34.400]  Then in other words,
[01:49:34.400 --> 01:49:37.160]  they still have time to do an arraignment, don't they?
[01:49:38.280 --> 01:49:39.120]  Okay.
[01:49:40.720 --> 01:49:41.800]  When you go to trial,
[01:49:41.800 --> 01:49:44.960]  they're gonna ask you to enter a plea at trial.
[01:49:46.600 --> 01:49:48.760]  Okay. All right?
[01:49:48.760 --> 01:49:50.480]  Have you ever entered a plea?
[01:49:51.400 --> 01:49:53.240]  No. Okay.
[01:49:53.240 --> 01:49:55.600]  And I refuse to sign the citation.
[01:49:57.760 --> 01:49:58.600]  Okay.
[01:50:01.320 --> 01:50:04.600]  I would never enter a plea in a court of no record.
[01:50:04.600 --> 01:50:05.920]  Well, you never enter a plea
[01:50:05.920 --> 01:50:08.200]  whether it's a court of record or not.
[01:50:08.200 --> 01:50:13.120]  But the point of it is, is you never refuse.
[01:50:13.120 --> 01:50:16.280]  You simply ask them, do you intend to,
[01:50:16.280 --> 01:50:17.600]  as a friend of mine put it,
[01:50:18.480 --> 01:50:19.840]  he puts it in there and says,
[01:50:19.840 --> 01:50:23.240]  do you intend to accept an unconscionable plea?
[01:50:25.280 --> 01:50:28.480]  And if the answer is no,
[01:50:28.480 --> 01:50:33.480]  well, I cannot in good conscience make a plea at this time
[01:50:33.560 --> 01:50:36.160]  and then whatever basis for that is,
[01:50:36.160 --> 01:50:39.320]  because they only gain jurisdiction to enter a plea for you
[01:50:39.320 --> 01:50:41.120]  if you refuse.
[01:50:42.960 --> 01:50:44.080]  Okay? Okay.
[01:50:44.080 --> 01:50:45.800]  The statute is specifically written
[01:50:45.800 --> 01:50:50.240]  that if the accused refuses to enter a plea,
[01:50:50.240 --> 01:50:51.920]  you're not refusing. Okay.
[01:50:51.920 --> 01:50:54.640]  You are simply demanding the court respect your rights
[01:50:54.640 --> 01:50:57.320]  so that a considerable plea can be entered.
[01:50:57.320 --> 01:50:58.520]  They never do that.
[01:50:58.520 --> 01:50:59.960]  They can't do that.
[01:50:59.960 --> 01:51:06.240]  The way it's designed prevents that from happening.
[01:51:06.240 --> 01:51:08.160]  Now, when you say consumable,
[01:51:08.160 --> 01:51:11.600]  you mean aware of all elements.
[01:51:12.640 --> 01:51:15.480]  No, I mean that it's complied with all the points
[01:51:15.480 --> 01:51:18.840]  and procedures of due process and the rights of the accused,
[01:51:18.840 --> 01:51:20.840]  including the right of notice
[01:51:22.280 --> 01:51:25.160]  and a proper establishment of jurisdiction of the court
[01:51:25.160 --> 01:51:30.160]  over the accused, which they also never do.
[01:51:30.360 --> 01:51:31.200]  Right.
[01:51:31.200 --> 01:51:33.320]  I've challenged jurisdiction.
[01:51:33.320 --> 01:51:35.440]  Yeah, but how have you challenged jurisdiction?
[01:51:35.440 --> 01:51:37.600]  And it can possibly have jurisdiction.
[01:51:38.520 --> 01:51:39.360]  Okay.
[01:51:39.360 --> 01:51:41.960]  How have you challenged jurisdiction?
[01:51:41.960 --> 01:51:43.000]  What grounds?
[01:51:44.680 --> 01:51:49.400]  On the grounds that I was not in commerce
[01:51:49.400 --> 01:51:52.760]  and that the officer acted without jurisdiction
[01:51:52.760 --> 01:51:57.760]  over my private property and misapplied a commercial code.
[01:51:59.040 --> 01:51:59.880]  Okay.
[01:52:01.160 --> 01:52:03.880]  So when you go to court, what are you going to say
[01:52:03.880 --> 01:52:05.040]  when they force you to trial?
[01:52:05.040 --> 01:52:06.800]  The officer acted without authority.
[01:52:06.800 --> 01:52:10.360]  He's acted under color of law and did not...
[01:52:10.360 --> 01:52:12.880]  You, unless you're going to get up on the stand
[01:52:12.880 --> 01:52:15.720]  and testify to that fact, that's never going to get heard.
[01:52:15.720 --> 01:52:20.000]  No, I'm cross-examining him and asking him
[01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:25.000]  if he understands the Texas Administrative Code
[01:52:26.080 --> 01:52:31.080]  where it clearly defines that he's to supervise travel
[01:52:31.920 --> 01:52:33.520]  and regulate commercial traffic.
[01:52:33.520 --> 01:52:35.240]  What agency wrote you the ticket?
[01:52:35.240 --> 01:52:37.920]  If he could distinguish between the two.
[01:52:37.920 --> 01:52:40.000]  What agency wrote you the ticket?
[01:52:41.840 --> 01:52:43.160]  DPS.
[01:52:43.160 --> 01:52:45.800]  Department of Transportation.
[01:52:45.800 --> 01:52:46.640]  Officer Brooks.
[01:52:46.640 --> 01:52:49.400]  Let me tell you what the prosecutor is going to do.
[01:52:49.400 --> 01:52:53.520]  Objection, not relevant to the facts of the case.
[01:52:53.520 --> 01:52:57.240]  And the officer is not required to know those things.
[01:52:57.240 --> 01:52:59.360]  And the court is going to sustain it.
[01:53:00.880 --> 01:53:02.600]  The officer is not required to know
[01:53:02.600 --> 01:53:04.600]  the Texas Administrative Code?
[01:53:04.600 --> 01:53:05.440]  No.
[01:53:06.440 --> 01:53:08.400]  Didn't the Supreme Court just rule that an officer
[01:53:08.400 --> 01:53:10.880]  is not required to know the law to make a stop?
[01:53:10.880 --> 01:53:13.720]  The officer is not required to know the law to make a stop?
[01:53:16.240 --> 01:53:18.160]  Well, isn't that neglect of duty?
[01:53:18.160 --> 01:53:21.360]  If they're not kept up to date on current...
[01:53:21.360 --> 01:53:25.080]  Not according to the Supreme Court ruling, it's not.
[01:53:25.080 --> 01:53:29.160]  All they have to do is classify it as a mistake of law
[01:53:29.160 --> 01:53:30.360]  and they're scot-free.
[01:53:32.120 --> 01:53:32.960]  Wow.
[01:53:34.120 --> 01:53:39.120]  Well, what do you suggest I do about the court trial
[01:53:39.120 --> 01:53:41.560]  from a judge that has not arraigned me?
[01:53:43.120 --> 01:53:46.440]  You object to it, but what's the purpose of an arraignment?
[01:53:46.440 --> 01:53:47.280]  Do you know?
[01:53:48.280 --> 01:53:52.080]  Yeah, to identify you, to state the charges
[01:53:52.080 --> 01:53:54.800]  and make sure that you understand them.
[01:53:54.800 --> 01:53:55.640]  No.
[01:53:56.600 --> 01:54:00.720]  To identify the accused and to accept his plea.
[01:54:01.840 --> 01:54:02.800]  Okay.
[01:54:03.760 --> 01:54:06.080]  Well, that's never happened.
[01:54:06.080 --> 01:54:10.160]  No, but there also is no stipulation as to what order
[01:54:10.160 --> 01:54:12.760]  of proceeding it has to occur in either.
[01:54:13.920 --> 01:54:14.760]  Okay.
[01:54:16.000 --> 01:54:19.320]  So when they ask me how do I plea,
[01:54:19.320 --> 01:54:23.160]  I ask them if they accept unconscionable plea?
[01:54:24.480 --> 01:54:28.800]  Is the court willing to accept an unconscionable plea?
[01:54:29.760 --> 01:54:30.600]  Okay.
[01:54:32.720 --> 01:54:33.560]  All right.
[01:54:33.560 --> 01:54:37.680]  Okay, and how would you define an unconscionable plea?
[01:54:38.640 --> 01:54:41.440]  Anything that requires that you waive a protected right
[01:54:41.440 --> 01:54:42.800]  in order to do it.
[01:54:42.800 --> 01:54:44.880]  Anything that requires that you waive
[01:54:44.880 --> 01:54:47.960]  a due process violation in order to do it.
[01:54:47.960 --> 01:54:50.480]  Anything that waives any requirement of law
[01:54:50.480 --> 01:54:53.560]  that they have failed to follow in order to do it.
[01:54:54.480 --> 01:54:56.200]  Okay, got it.
[01:54:56.200 --> 01:54:57.480]  Thank you very much, Eddie.
[01:54:57.480 --> 01:54:59.880]  That's great, that's good news.
[01:54:59.880 --> 01:55:04.760]  Now, okay, is this court willing to accept an unconscionable
[01:55:04.760 --> 01:55:09.240]  plea and my unconscionable plea should be?
[01:55:09.240 --> 01:55:10.880]  No, don't.
[01:55:10.880 --> 01:55:12.720]  Well, I'd be a little bolder.
[01:55:12.720 --> 01:55:16.760]  I says, does this court intend to compel me
[01:55:16.760 --> 01:55:19.080]  to make an unconscionable plea?
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:21.680]  Okay, okay.
[01:55:21.680 --> 01:55:23.000]  That'd be my offer to it.
[01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:25.840]  It'd be like, are you gonna force me
[01:55:25.840 --> 01:55:27.560]  to make an unconscionable plea?
[01:55:27.560 --> 01:55:32.560]  Okay, and that'd be the same as saying to someone that,
[01:55:33.040 --> 01:55:36.680]  hey, are you gonna make me sign an unconscionable contract?
[01:55:37.920 --> 01:55:39.760]  Not that I'm saying this is all a contract.
[01:55:39.760 --> 01:55:41.960]  Don't mistake what I'm saying here for one for the other.
[01:55:41.960 --> 01:55:43.560]  I'm just using that as an example.
[01:55:43.560 --> 01:55:44.520]  Right, right.
[01:55:46.680 --> 01:55:49.600]  So is this court willing to make me
[01:55:49.600 --> 01:55:51.360]  enter an unconscionable plea?
[01:55:52.520 --> 01:55:54.920]  Yeah, does this court intend to make me
[01:55:54.920 --> 01:55:58.160]  or compel me to enter an unconscionable plea?
[01:55:58.160 --> 01:56:00.600]  Intend to compel, okay.
[01:56:02.040 --> 01:56:06.120]  Right, and a plea, an unconscionable plea
[01:56:06.120 --> 01:56:08.880]  is on the grounds that you violated my rights.
[01:56:08.880 --> 01:56:10.480]  That's an unconscionable plea.
[01:56:11.640 --> 01:56:13.240]  They violated due process.
[01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:16.200]  They.
[01:56:16.200 --> 01:56:18.880]  Well, they always violate due process.
[01:56:18.880 --> 01:56:23.000]  You gotta understand, though, exactly how they did it
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:25.920]  and what they were required to do.
[01:56:25.920 --> 01:56:28.080]  They can say they're required to do anything
[01:56:28.080 --> 01:56:29.680]  and they're allowed to do it in this order,
[01:56:29.680 --> 01:56:31.320]  this way or this whatever,
[01:56:31.320 --> 01:56:34.280]  but until you know the rules they're required to play by,
[01:56:34.280 --> 01:56:36.800]  you have no way to rebut that and address it.
[01:56:37.880 --> 01:56:38.720]  Right.
[01:56:41.760 --> 01:56:44.760]  Would a declaratory judgment help here in any way?
[01:56:44.760 --> 01:56:47.720]  Not unless the declaratory judgment is that
[01:56:47.720 --> 01:56:50.720]  you're not susceptible to the code.
[01:56:50.720 --> 01:56:53.320]  Good luck. Right.
[01:56:53.320 --> 01:56:55.480]  Well, wouldn't it, wouldn't,
[01:56:55.480 --> 01:56:59.120]  doesn't case law verify that I'm not susceptible to the code?
[01:56:59.120 --> 01:57:00.320]  No.
[01:57:00.320 --> 01:57:02.120]  Where did you get the idea that it does that?
[01:57:02.120 --> 01:57:05.760]  Thompson, the right to travel on the common way.
[01:57:05.760 --> 01:57:07.760]  There's your mistake.
[01:57:07.760 --> 01:57:10.800]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:57:10.800 --> 01:57:12.800]  There's your mistake.
[01:57:12.800 --> 01:57:17.240]  The right to travel is never, ever
[01:57:17.240 --> 01:57:21.040]  a proper rebuttal to the accusation being made against you.
[01:57:22.160 --> 01:57:23.520]  Never.
[01:57:23.520 --> 01:57:25.280]  It is oil and water.
[01:57:25.280 --> 01:57:27.280]  They don't go together.
[01:57:28.480 --> 01:57:29.560]  Wow.
[01:57:29.560 --> 01:57:32.480]  A truck, okay, follow this example.
[01:57:32.480 --> 01:57:36.840]  Is a truck driver subject to the transportation code?
[01:57:39.040 --> 01:57:40.640]  Just straight up yes or no.
[01:57:42.400 --> 01:57:44.680]  A commercial truck.
[01:57:44.680 --> 01:57:47.280]  Yeah, a truck driver, yes.
[01:57:49.880 --> 01:57:52.080]  If it's in commerce, yes.
[01:57:53.560 --> 01:57:56.800]  Does a truck driver also have the right to travel?
[01:57:59.480 --> 01:58:01.440]  No, not if it's in commerce.
[01:58:03.880 --> 01:58:07.040]  Okay, this is going to be more difficult than I thought.
[01:58:07.040 --> 01:58:08.840]  All right, Eddie, we're out of time right now,
[01:58:08.840 --> 01:58:11.040]  but we're going to have to have more on this discussion here
[01:58:11.040 --> 01:58:12.280]  to understand how this works.
[01:58:12.280 --> 01:58:15.120]  So give me a call next Monday and we'll continue, okay?
[01:58:16.120 --> 01:58:18.160]  Okay, Eddie, thank you.
[01:58:18.160 --> 01:58:19.400]  Yeah, no problem, man.
[01:58:19.400 --> 01:58:22.120]  All right, folks, this has been
[01:58:22.120 --> 01:58:24.120]  the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show
[01:58:24.120 --> 01:58:25.280]  with your host Eddie Craig.
[01:58:25.280 --> 01:58:27.360]  I want to thank you all so much for calling in
[01:58:27.360 --> 01:58:29.480]  and for all the financial support you've given
[01:58:29.480 --> 01:58:31.560]  in the fundraiser and to me personally,
[01:58:31.560 --> 01:58:33.280]  I greatly appreciate that.
[01:58:33.280 --> 01:58:35.640]  I will continue to try to get the class videos
[01:58:35.640 --> 01:58:38.240]  that have been purchased so far edited
[01:58:38.240 --> 01:58:41.560]  and get in touch with the folks on where to download them.
[01:58:41.560 --> 01:58:43.840]  In the meantime, y'all have a blessed week.
[01:58:43.840 --> 01:58:45.600]  Good night, God bless.
[01:58:50.400 --> 01:58:53.880]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free
[01:58:53.880 --> 01:58:55.840]  a unique study Bible called
[01:58:55.840 --> 01:58:57.960]  the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.960 --> 01:58:59.520]  The New Testament Recovery Version
[01:58:59.520 --> 01:59:02.400]  has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.400 --> 01:59:04.720]  what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:04.720 --> 01:59:08.480]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.480 --> 01:59:11.760]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.760 --> 01:59:16.840]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.840 --> 01:59:20.720]  or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.720 --> 01:59:22.960]  This translation is highly accurate
[01:59:22.960 --> 01:59:26.240]  and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.240 --> 01:59:28.840]  plus charts and maps and an outline
[01:59:28.840 --> 01:59:30.320]  for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.320 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:35.960]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:35.960 --> 01:59:40.960]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.200 --> 01:59:45.120]  That's 888-551-0102
[01:59:45.120 --> 01:59:49.520]  or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.880 --> 01:59:53.480]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:53.480 --> 02:00:12.480]  You found it, logosradionetwork.com.