[00:00.000 --> 00:07.920] This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates, online [00:07.920 --> 00:09.760] at thelibertybeat.com. [00:09.760 --> 00:14.600] I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, September 29th, 2014. [00:14.600 --> 00:23.560] Gold opened today at $1,220, silver opened at $17.51, and Bitcoin is trading around $373.13. [00:23.560 --> 00:27.920] Today's Bitcoin price brought to you by Express Coin, the fastest and most reliable way to [00:27.920 --> 00:29.200] buy Bitcoin. [00:29.200 --> 00:32.240] Buy Bitcoin today at expresscoin.com. [00:32.240 --> 00:35.760] Support for the Liberty Beat comes from the Michael Cargill for Austin City Council District [00:35.760 --> 00:37.000] One campaign. [00:37.000 --> 00:39.920] Vote Michael Cargill to get the cars moving. [00:39.920 --> 00:44.320] Learn more or sign up to volunteer at cargillfortexas.com. [00:44.320 --> 00:47.440] Full advertisement paid for by the Michael Cargill for Austin City Council District One [00:47.440 --> 00:48.720] campaign. [00:48.720 --> 00:52.760] In the news today, civilians were killed while militants were wounded following Sunday night [00:52.760 --> 00:55.760] airstrikes in northern and eastern Syria. [00:55.760 --> 01:00.360] That word from the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which is monitoring the [01:00.360 --> 01:01.360] war. [01:01.360 --> 01:05.320] According to the observatory, the airstrikes hit grain silos, mills, and other such targets [01:05.320 --> 01:07.760] instead of an Islamic State operations base. [01:07.760 --> 01:14.320] Reuters reports there has been no word from the Obama administration regarding the claims. [01:14.320 --> 01:19.740] On Saturday, hundreds of pro-Palestine protesters blocked an Israeli cargo ship from unloading [01:19.740 --> 01:21.560] at the port of Oakland. [01:21.560 --> 01:25.360] Protesters wanted to express their anger with Israel's bombing of Palestinians in Gaza. [01:25.360 --> 01:29.440] The Stop Zim Action Committee organized the action against the Zim Shanghai ship. [01:29.440 --> 01:33.680] The protest marks the second time Israeli cargo ships were blocked after similar actions [01:33.680 --> 01:36.960] in California and Florida last month. [01:36.960 --> 01:41.680] Tomorrow, the activist group Flooride Free Houston will be returning to the Houston City [01:41.680 --> 01:45.800] Council in a relaunched effort to end the practice of water fluoridation. [01:45.800 --> 01:50.000] The group first began lobbying the city in the summer of 2012, receiving support from [01:50.000 --> 01:51.440] two council members. [01:51.440 --> 01:55.800] Mayor Annise Parker, known for her environmental efforts, has yet to support the group. [01:55.800 --> 01:59.240] With the new campaign, the group hopes to educate Houston City Council members about [01:59.240 --> 02:01.280] the arguments against water fluoridation. [02:01.280 --> 02:04.400] Flooride Free Houston member Derek Rose spoke about the group's mission. [02:04.400 --> 02:08.360] Flooride Free Houston aims to bring an end to water fluoridation in the city by raising [02:08.360 --> 02:12.880] awareness of city council members and citizens on the fact that it is a financial waste, [02:12.880 --> 02:17.680] a health hazard, an environmental hazard, it's a violation of civil liberties, and it [02:17.680 --> 02:19.720] affects Houston's poorest communities. [02:19.720 --> 02:24.320] The group will attend the city council tomorrow and again on Tuesday, October 7th. [02:24.320 --> 02:29.120] Support for Liberty Beat comes from Cabo Bob's Southwestern Sour Burritos, now with two locations [02:29.120 --> 02:33.800] in Austin, 500 East Ben White Boulevard and 2828 Rio Grande Boulevard. [02:33.800 --> 02:36.280] Find them online, Cabobobs.com. [02:36.280 --> 02:40.440] And support comes from Sovereign Living, a podcast, blog, and reality show about what [02:40.440 --> 02:42.960] it takes to live a voluntary and natural life. [02:42.960 --> 02:47.080] Check out the blog at SovereignLiving.com and watch episode one of the soon to be released [02:47.080 --> 02:50.520] reality show at SovereignLiving.tv. [02:50.520 --> 02:54.680] This is the Liberty Beat for Monday, September 29th, 2014. [02:54.680 --> 02:59.280] Check out the website at theLibertyBeat.com and like us on Facebook at Facebook.com the [02:59.280 --> 03:21.440] Liberty Beat. [03:21.440 --> 03:41.720] The Liberty Beat for Monday, September 29th, 2014. [03:41.720 --> 04:05.400] Check out the website at theLibertyBeat.com and like us on Facebook at Facebook.com the [04:05.400 --> 04:27.560] Liberty Beat for Monday, September 29th, 2014. [04:27.560 --> 04:28.560] All right, folks. [04:28.560 --> 04:29.560] Good evening. [04:29.560 --> 04:33.760] This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig. [04:33.760 --> 04:37.600] It is September 29th, 2014. [04:37.600 --> 04:43.760] This year is just steaming right along to an end, is it not? [04:43.760 --> 04:49.680] We really need to be having this stuff that we have going on in America addressed and [04:49.680 --> 04:54.600] fought against, folks, because I just came back from Lubbock. [04:54.600 --> 04:59.800] I spent the entire weekend there doing presentation to some folks of the Private or the Protect [04:59.800 --> 05:02.240] Water Rights Coalition. [05:02.240 --> 05:06.640] And basically what's going on up around the Lubbock area and many other areas of both [05:06.640 --> 05:13.360] Texas and the other states is you have the state governments and the private corporate [05:13.360 --> 05:22.720] interests that petition and loot the resources of the people via the state governments to [05:22.720 --> 05:27.080] take away the private water rights of the people that own the farms and the ranches [05:27.080 --> 05:34.160] and limit how much of their own water they can actually use, when they can use it and [05:34.160 --> 05:37.120] how they can use it and so on and so forth. [05:37.120 --> 05:41.900] And it works pretty much like the government budgeting system. [05:41.900 --> 05:47.960] You get allocated X amount of something during the year and if you fail to spend it, the [05:47.960 --> 05:52.500] difference is removed from your budget next year. [05:52.500 --> 05:57.880] So what these practices are actually going to wind up encouraging is wasting of water [05:57.880 --> 06:03.760] rather than the conservation that these people have managed to do on their own quite successfully [06:03.760 --> 06:10.960] on par with or better than any state or locally managed governmental method to keep their [06:10.960 --> 06:17.560] aquifer full and their water levels where they need it to be to function year round. [06:17.560 --> 06:22.440] But the government in its infinite stupidity believes it can do everything better than [06:22.440 --> 06:27.600] the people that actually have to do it every day and to protect themselves by doing it [06:27.600 --> 06:30.200] right. [06:30.200 --> 06:35.120] As always government thinks it has the answer and I wouldn't trust government to sell me [06:35.120 --> 06:40.640] a working stapler much less providing me with a good answer on how to protect or make a [06:40.640 --> 06:43.240] living. [06:43.240 --> 06:44.600] And these folks are no different. [06:44.600 --> 06:50.520] A lot of them up there fully understand the issue as far as its level of importance even [06:50.520 --> 06:54.480] if they don't understand the nitty gritty details of the type of fight it's going to [06:54.480 --> 06:57.560] be and how it's going to be carried out. [06:57.560 --> 07:06.080] And I must say I was very pleasantly surprised by the level of attention and knowledge that [07:06.080 --> 07:12.840] these folks displayed on what is being done to them by the state or at least the agencies [07:12.840 --> 07:17.640] pretending to operate under the auspices and power of the state. [07:17.640 --> 07:27.600] It was really motivational and it helped bolster my purpose once again and buoy me back up [07:27.600 --> 07:33.880] because there are times when doing what we do here on rule of law really can hit a low [07:33.880 --> 07:44.360] point because we know what is right but we can't make people do it the correct way. [07:44.360 --> 07:50.440] We have to try to show you and offer suggestions on the best way to do things but in the end [07:50.440 --> 07:56.320] it comes to you and you alone on how to implement it because they're not allowing anyone else [07:56.320 --> 08:01.040] to speak on your behalf unless it is someone that actually works for them and is willing [08:01.040 --> 08:03.640] to sell you out. [08:03.640 --> 08:06.040] What is the issue? [08:06.040 --> 08:09.160] These folks are not willing to be sold out. [08:09.160 --> 08:15.040] They've had assistance of counsel in this and my understanding is they're somewhat pleased [08:15.040 --> 08:18.560] with him but I don't know all the details of that or how much of this he's actually [08:18.560 --> 08:19.920] gone into. [08:19.920 --> 08:25.120] I do not even know how many of the arguments that I wrote into a document for these folks [08:25.120 --> 08:28.560] called a letter and demand of non-consent. [08:28.560 --> 08:33.640] It's basically a statement by these folks in affidavit form stating that they shall not [08:33.640 --> 08:39.760] and will not provide consent which is what the statute says they have to do by petition [08:39.760 --> 08:43.980] before these water districts can touch their water. [08:43.980 --> 08:48.200] If they don't get the consent of the private landowner, they can't touch the water and [08:48.200 --> 08:55.600] they certainly can't regulate it and right now the biggest problem I see is this. [08:55.600 --> 09:01.600] I researched this information and came up with several Texas Supreme Court cases and [09:01.600 --> 09:07.720] from the language of those cases, the case law is on a collision course of locomotive [09:07.720 --> 09:15.640] proportions with the state statutes in the water code under chapter 36 because the language [09:15.640 --> 09:22.920] used in the case opinion certainly makes it clear that the language of the statute will [09:22.920 --> 09:27.400] not be allowed to stand as it's written. [09:27.400 --> 09:32.120] So it'll be interesting to see whether or not the courts wind up backpedaling on this [09:32.120 --> 09:38.900] issue and acquiescing to the state's demand to seize private property yet once again under [09:38.900 --> 09:45.120] a claim of public necessity when in fact it's got nothing to do with that because the public [09:45.120 --> 09:52.900] at issue here and most of the others in question have managed to successfully be self-governing [09:52.900 --> 09:57.280] on keeping their water where and how it needs to be. [09:57.280 --> 10:00.040] So there is no public necessity here. [10:00.040 --> 10:04.160] There is revenue issues here. [10:04.160 --> 10:12.400] In fact, the so-called expert on geology that the state used to testify at the administrative [10:12.400 --> 10:21.320] hearing on how these aquifers have to be state-managed in order to be successful, the woman didn't [10:21.320 --> 10:27.680] testify to anything geological that I could find through it in her entire testimony. [10:27.680 --> 10:31.160] And that, according to her, is her only field of expertise. [10:31.160 --> 10:32.840] She's a geologist. [10:32.840 --> 10:39.320] Yet she never testified on anything relating to water tables, ground structure, anything [10:39.320 --> 10:41.240] of that sort. [10:41.240 --> 10:47.320] The only thing this woman testified to was how she determined how much revenue the counties [10:47.320 --> 10:54.040] and state could take from these people in taxes for managing their water. [10:54.040 --> 10:57.080] That's all she testified to. [10:57.080 --> 11:04.840] Here's how much we can get if we pretend to be in charge and make them pay us to do it. [11:04.840 --> 11:06.160] That's what she testified to. [11:06.160 --> 11:13.160] If you want to talk about a completely rigged setup on how this is going to work, had I [11:13.160 --> 11:19.640] been the attorney on this case, I would have objected vehemently to this woman testifying [11:19.640 --> 11:26.360] as an expert witness to tax revenue because she's neither an accountant nor an employee [11:26.360 --> 11:28.760] of the state comptroller's office. [11:28.760 --> 11:37.000] She's a geologist in the employ of the water districts and the TECQ who want to seize control [11:37.000 --> 11:41.040] of these people's private water. [11:41.040 --> 11:47.560] I would have objected and never allowed her to be taken in to testify as an expert witness [11:47.560 --> 11:55.200] because she did not testify in any field of expertise of her own whatsoever. [11:55.200 --> 11:59.920] But that's just my opinion on where the attorney may have messed up in this. [11:59.920 --> 12:04.400] I don't know, I didn't see anything in the documents provided to me if he objected to [12:04.400 --> 12:08.120] her testifying or not. [12:08.120 --> 12:13.080] I don't even know who it was who actually questioned her in regards to this, if it was [12:13.080 --> 12:17.680] the attorney or if it was the representative for these folks that actually is one of these [12:17.680 --> 12:19.160] folks. [12:19.160 --> 12:24.200] But either way, I would have objected based upon the fact that she cannot testify as an [12:24.200 --> 12:29.500] expert witness on anything except the geological structure of the ground. [12:29.500 --> 12:32.040] But all she testified to was tax revenue. [12:32.040 --> 12:38.280] That's my two cents worth on that particular issue from all that I gleaned while I've been [12:38.280 --> 12:42.840] doing the construction of this document for them over the past several weeks. [12:42.840 --> 12:48.160] I put about 40 hours of reading and research time into this and then about three straight [12:48.160 --> 12:52.000] days of writing it based upon the information I gathered. [12:52.000 --> 12:59.840] In fact, the court cases I came up with, I found a lot of them on my own based upon what [12:59.840 --> 13:04.400] they had because they started linking together once they started making references to one, [13:04.400 --> 13:06.280] I was able to find more. [13:06.280 --> 13:11.440] But it was really interesting that so far the state Supreme Court has come down very [13:11.440 --> 13:19.160] solidly on private water rights being exactly that, private, and that nobody can compel [13:19.160 --> 13:21.440] them to give up their water. [13:21.440 --> 13:25.440] In fact, the language of the case was very clear that the person who lives on the surface [13:25.440 --> 13:32.000] has every right to dig into the ground and whatever he finds there is his for the taking [13:32.000 --> 13:41.320] and he can take it and use it with impunity, meaning any way in any amount they want to [13:41.320 --> 13:47.200] even to the point of using up everything there that they find, including water. [13:47.200 --> 13:51.480] And if their use of the water makes their neighbors well run dry because they happen [13:51.480 --> 13:57.960] to be in the same aquifer, they can't say anything about it simply because that person [13:57.960 --> 14:02.760] had equal right to the water that the other person did. [14:02.760 --> 14:09.720] The difference here being is that these people have been very self-managing on wasteful use, [14:09.720 --> 14:16.080] they have kept their farms and ranches productive, they have fared well even during drought conditions [14:16.080 --> 14:22.360] because of their management based upon the information that I had to have at the moment. [14:22.360 --> 14:29.280] And so there is nothing that requires the state to be screaming public necessity for [14:29.280 --> 14:35.080] them to be forced into a water management district against their will. [14:35.080 --> 14:40.240] And the moment that happens, the water management district is going to take over their wells, [14:40.240 --> 14:45.960] they're going to make them meter their own wells and make them pay for their own water [14:45.960 --> 14:52.320] based upon their overages of an allotted amount that the case law that I've looked at specifically [14:52.320 --> 14:59.300] says the state nor anyone else has any right to set upon these people. [14:59.300 --> 15:05.400] So the case law and the statute are going to collide eventually and I'm hoping that [15:05.400 --> 15:10.520] I am the one that helps facilitate that because it's going to be interesting to see if the [15:10.520 --> 15:16.680] courts do what the courts normally do and turn Charlie Brown wishy washy on the people [15:16.680 --> 15:22.820] to once again sell them out to government and corporate interests for profit. [15:22.820 --> 15:27.360] Because that's what's going to happen if these people lose. [15:27.360 --> 15:33.280] The law and the case law and common sense and morality says they can't lose. [15:33.280 --> 15:37.080] And the other thing is, is most of these people have land patents. [15:37.080 --> 15:41.480] The language of the land patent is very, very clear. [15:41.480 --> 15:51.340] The state of Texas cedes all claims and title to this land forever. [15:51.340 --> 15:58.360] Now you would think that would be plain enough to anybody that read it to say the state has [15:58.360 --> 16:06.280] no authority on that land to do anything with it whatsoever or deny the proper owner of [16:06.280 --> 16:08.640] it in doing the same. [16:08.640 --> 16:14.360] They are free to do with the land, on the land and under the land as they see fit. [16:14.360 --> 16:18.080] It is theirs. [16:18.080 --> 16:23.380] But this right here folks is where your very rights and freedoms are being taken away because [16:23.380 --> 16:28.660] all rights are based upon private individual interest and rights. [16:28.660 --> 16:34.480] And when the individual has none, neither do the people collectively. [16:34.480 --> 16:37.160] Because it's all individual or it's none. [16:37.160 --> 16:42.200] All right folks, I got a full caller board and as soon as we get back, I'm going to start [16:42.200 --> 16:43.200] taking the calls. [16:43.200 --> 16:45.800] So everybody that's there, y'all hang on. [16:45.800 --> 16:50.640] Call in number 512-646-1984. [16:50.640 --> 16:51.640] Y'all hang on. [16:51.640 --> 17:00.720] We'll be right back. [17:00.720 --> 17:06.040] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of [17:06.040 --> 17:07.040] nutrition. [17:07.040 --> 17:11.480] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that. [17:11.480 --> 17:17.160] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [17:17.160 --> 17:23.520] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can [17:23.520 --> 17:25.640] provide the nutrients you need. [17:25.640 --> 17:30.600] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which [17:30.600 --> 17:31.720] we reject. [17:31.720 --> 17:36.960] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [17:36.960 --> 17:39.800] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others. [17:39.800 --> 17:46.080] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [17:46.080 --> 17:47.320] quality radio. [17:47.320 --> 17:51.680] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [17:51.680 --> 17:57.320] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [17:57.320 --> 17:59.280] increase your income. [17:59.280 --> 18:00.600] Order now. [18:00.600 --> 18:05.320] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [18:05.320 --> 18:09.440] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [18:09.440 --> 18:13.720] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you [18:13.720 --> 18:14.720] can win too. [18:14.720 --> 18:19.640] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [18:19.640 --> 18:25.400] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer [18:25.400 --> 18:29.920] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the [18:29.920 --> 18:34.120] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:34.120 --> 18:39.240] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:39.240 --> 18:41.360] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:41.360 --> 18:46.920] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [18:46.920 --> 18:49.920] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [18:49.920 --> 18:58.920] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt [18:58.920 --> 18:59.920] collectors now. [18:59.920 --> 19:08.920] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the Logos Radio Network.com. [19:08.920 --> 19:28.120] All right, folks. [19:28.120 --> 19:29.120] We are back. [19:29.120 --> 19:32.920] This is Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to start taking your calls, and right now [19:32.920 --> 19:35.800] we're going to start with Andrew in Pennsylvania. [19:35.800 --> 19:39.160] Andrew, what can we do for you? [19:39.160 --> 19:45.120] Eddie, I'd like to discuss how one is supposed to fight a situation in court, which is another [19:45.120 --> 19:48.440] case where the courts are obviously not siding with the people. [19:48.440 --> 19:54.040] The whole issue of fruit of the poisonous tree exclusionary rule, two Supreme Court [19:54.040 --> 19:58.680] cases in particular, Herring versus United States, said that even if the police make [19:58.680 --> 20:03.800] a negligent error in a computer system, the evidence can still be admissible in the Hudson [20:03.800 --> 20:08.960] versus Michigan case, where there was a warrant, but the police violated the knock and announce [20:08.960 --> 20:13.080] rule and the evidence was still taken to court, and Judge Scalia made the most ridiculous [20:13.080 --> 20:15.400] statement ever to justify his decision. [20:15.400 --> 20:20.480] When the lawyer argued the case, Scalia was like, well, a lot has changed since 1961 when [20:20.480 --> 20:26.800] the Matt versus Ohio case was involved, including police having a lot more respect for people's [20:26.800 --> 20:30.240] rights, which just makes you want to cry that he would say that. [20:30.240 --> 20:35.560] And also another good case of this, if you're taken to jail, arrested, strip searched, and [20:35.560 --> 20:39.760] they find drugs on you, even though they don't have a warrant, and even if they had no probable [20:39.760 --> 20:42.320] cause, I mean, that evidence would still be admitted in the court. [20:42.320 --> 20:46.120] I mean, these are cases where it's a fruit of the poisonous tree, but the courts are [20:46.120 --> 20:49.420] obviously not on the people's side, especially in recent times. [20:49.420 --> 20:51.320] How does one argue something like that? [20:51.320 --> 20:56.600] Well, there's nothing you can argue in a corrupt court that will sway a corrupt court, Andrew. [20:56.600 --> 21:00.080] That's just a common sense way of doing it. [21:00.080 --> 21:04.920] So in all honesty, I don't have a set answer for you on that. [21:04.920 --> 21:08.200] Who do you appeal to after the US Supreme Court? [21:08.200 --> 21:10.360] You can't appeal to anyone. [21:10.360 --> 21:12.120] That's the problem. [21:12.120 --> 21:13.800] The system is broken. [21:13.800 --> 21:15.320] There is no question of that. [21:15.320 --> 21:20.880] And there is nothing that the Supreme Court can decide anymore that I would agree with [21:20.880 --> 21:22.480] 99% of the time. [21:22.480 --> 21:27.560] And that doesn't matter whether it's the federal or the Texas, because neither of them are [21:27.560 --> 21:32.600] considering the actual true principles and ethics that are associated with the rights [21:32.600 --> 21:37.160] enumerated and protected in either document. [21:37.160 --> 21:42.920] They just don't care because the people just don't care. [21:42.920 --> 21:48.880] They know there's not enough of us to get at them without a lot of bloodshed. [21:48.880 --> 21:55.160] So what do they have to lose by doing what they do if they're protected? [21:55.160 --> 21:56.160] That's the problem. [21:56.160 --> 22:00.280] I don't have a pat answer for you, because I haven't read the specific cases you're talking [22:00.280 --> 22:05.960] about so I can see what their reasoning might have been and how they came to it. [22:05.960 --> 22:09.480] If you wanted those answers, you should have emailed me those and let me have a look at [22:09.480 --> 22:12.040] them before you asked me, because I don't have them memorized. [22:12.040 --> 22:14.680] I haven't read them. [22:14.680 --> 22:17.120] So I don't have a set answer for you. [22:17.120 --> 22:23.680] Once they start deciding corruptly, there's not anything you can do except appeal to the [22:23.680 --> 22:24.680] next level. [22:24.680 --> 22:27.120] Unfortunately, at the Supreme Court, there isn't one. [22:27.120 --> 22:33.040] The only hope we have at this point is people's grand juries being put into the constitutions [22:33.040 --> 22:40.200] at every level and enacted for our benefit, putting teeth in our individual constitutions [22:40.200 --> 22:42.600] to hold our public servants accountable. [22:42.600 --> 22:46.800] And then when judges make decisions like this, hang them. [22:46.800 --> 22:49.640] Right, right. [22:49.640 --> 22:55.160] And since I mentioned this, one of the people I had on my show, Andrew Vashago, government [22:55.160 --> 22:59.320] whistleblower, he said he wants to run for president in 2016. [22:59.320 --> 23:03.000] But I told him it would be illegal for you to do that, because I mentioned you and the [23:03.000 --> 23:07.880] fact that you've done a presentation on the Texas State Bar Association, which would apply [23:07.880 --> 23:12.240] to all states and also at the federal level about how lawyers cannot serve nonjudicial [23:12.240 --> 23:13.240] positions. [23:13.240 --> 23:14.760] But I told him, hey, use this. [23:14.760 --> 23:20.120] Not as long as they're actively participating at bar, and this particular state they're [23:20.120 --> 23:25.520] in made that bar organization an administrative department of the judicial branch. [23:25.520 --> 23:26.800] That's what they did in Texas. [23:26.800 --> 23:32.760] I can't say that's what they did in every state, though it most likely is. [23:32.760 --> 23:35.840] That's why they call them officers of the court. [23:35.840 --> 23:40.640] But you still need to do the research to verify that's true in your particular state. [23:40.640 --> 23:45.000] In Texas, it is true. [23:45.000 --> 23:50.360] Right, this guy, he's from Washington, you wouldn't know, but he said, no, it wouldn't [23:50.360 --> 23:51.360] be a problem. [23:51.360 --> 23:54.600] Even though I'm a lawyer, I can still run as president of the United States. [23:54.600 --> 23:57.600] And I told him, even if it's illegal, why don't you come out and use this to your advantage [23:57.600 --> 24:01.160] and say, hey, I'm not eligible to be president, but if I have to resign, so does everybody [24:01.160 --> 24:03.600] else who's not eligible, and that could be a good- [24:03.600 --> 24:10.040] Well, the difference is Obama was a lawyer, but he had to surrender his bar card. [24:10.040 --> 24:16.000] He wasn't eligible for other reasons, but it certainly wasn't because he was a lawyer. [24:16.000 --> 24:23.440] Now, if this guy surrenders his bar card because he is a judicial officer in his particular [24:23.440 --> 24:27.240] state, then he can run. [24:27.240 --> 24:32.040] But he can't do it in still practice, which, as the president, he couldn't do anyway. [24:32.040 --> 24:36.440] But if he kept the bar card alive, then he's actually sitting in two branches of government [24:36.440 --> 24:41.440] and that he cannot do. [24:41.440 --> 24:42.440] Right. [24:42.440 --> 24:45.000] Well, he did say he wants to fight for people's rights in regards to the fruit of the poisonous [24:45.000 --> 24:46.000] tree- [24:46.000 --> 24:50.040] Well, how can he fight for people's rights when he has zero understanding of the separation [24:50.040 --> 24:51.040] of powers? [24:51.040 --> 24:54.040] Well, he did give his case on this. [24:54.040 --> 24:58.080] I told him about this, and he gave his argument as to, no, no, it would be legal for me to [24:58.080 --> 24:59.080] be- [24:59.080 --> 25:04.440] Exactly my point, which proves he does not understand separation of powers. [25:04.440 --> 25:08.560] And if he doesn't understand something as simple as that, how's he going to understand [25:08.560 --> 25:10.760] any other part of it, is my question. [25:10.760 --> 25:14.600] Well, that is a good question. [25:14.600 --> 25:17.120] Some lawyers are better at some things than others. [25:17.120 --> 25:21.120] But he did give his case to explain, no, it would be legal for me to be president. [25:21.120 --> 25:23.000] I think he said maybe I would resign the lawyer thing. [25:23.000 --> 25:26.840] I don't remember exactly what he said, but just thought I'd point that out. [25:26.840 --> 25:27.840] Yeah. [25:27.840 --> 25:32.880] What most lawyers have come to try to argue is, I can do it because I wouldn't be doing [25:32.880 --> 25:35.320] both of them at the same time. [25:35.320 --> 25:38.620] That's not what the separation of powers in Texas says. [25:38.620 --> 25:44.840] It says if you're a member or group associated with one department, you are not allowed to [25:44.840 --> 25:49.840] exercise any power and authority belonging to any member of any other group or any other [25:49.840 --> 25:50.840] department. [25:50.840 --> 25:51.840] That's it. [25:51.840 --> 25:52.840] End of story. [25:52.840 --> 25:56.840] Doesn't matter whether it's simultaneously done or not. [25:56.840 --> 26:00.880] Being a member of one disqualifies you from being a member of the other. [26:00.880 --> 26:02.380] End of discussion. [26:02.380 --> 26:07.120] And most of them try to make that argument a simultaneous execution being the saving [26:07.120 --> 26:08.280] bell there. [26:08.280 --> 26:09.280] And it isn't. [26:09.280 --> 26:10.280] Yeah. [26:10.280 --> 26:11.280] It isn't. [26:11.280 --> 26:15.480] I get one quick question. [26:15.480 --> 26:20.760] Randy Kelton once said on his show, I do not think it's a good idea to go to the common [26:20.760 --> 26:25.000] law because common law is law made by a judge, which is tantamount to a dictatorship. [26:25.000 --> 26:27.880] He wants to have his judge restricted by statute. [26:27.880 --> 26:30.640] Do you agree or disagree with that? [26:30.640 --> 26:33.160] Well, I want... [26:33.160 --> 26:37.920] The difference there is who keeps telling you that the common law is judge made law? [26:37.920 --> 26:38.920] Lawyers do. [26:38.920 --> 26:41.080] When in fact, it isn't. [26:41.080 --> 26:45.120] The Magna Carta was not written by fricking lawyers and judges. [26:45.120 --> 26:50.800] It was written by the nobles that were subordinates of the King of England. [26:50.800 --> 26:55.560] And the principles of the common law are found in the Magna Carta, correct? [26:55.560 --> 26:56.920] Yes. [26:56.920 --> 27:00.580] No judge wrote it and all judges condemned it. [27:00.580 --> 27:04.000] So how can it be a judge made law? [27:04.000 --> 27:09.520] It can't be, right. [27:09.520 --> 27:11.680] It was the barons that created it. [27:11.680 --> 27:19.720] It was not the King and it was certainly not his judges and it certainly was not the church. [27:19.720 --> 27:24.520] So to argue that the common law originates in judge made law, no, sorry. [27:24.520 --> 27:29.640] If common law is based upon the origination of the Magna Carta, that may be what they [27:29.640 --> 27:34.520] devolved it into over time like they've done everything else. [27:34.520 --> 27:38.760] But it's not where it began and it's certainly not the principles and ethics upon which it's [27:38.760 --> 27:43.400] founded that it's judges' opinion only. [27:43.400 --> 27:48.440] All right, that makes sense. [27:48.440 --> 27:52.600] But in general, is it better to have a judge making law or a judge... [27:52.600 --> 27:53.600] Absolutely not. [27:53.600 --> 27:59.520] I do not want to be governed by a statute because a statute is not a law, ever. [27:59.520 --> 28:06.560] A statute is an agency regulatory interpretation of the actual law. [28:06.560 --> 28:12.800] And a regulatory law has nothing to do with the people in their private capacity. [28:12.800 --> 28:17.760] So until a judge learns the difference between a commercial capacity and a private one and [28:17.760 --> 28:24.560] respects it as such, I don't want a judge deciding anything because he's an idiot. [28:24.560 --> 28:27.720] Yes, many of them are. [28:27.720 --> 28:29.520] Eddie, I guess that's it. [28:29.520 --> 28:30.520] All right. [28:30.520 --> 28:31.520] Thanks for calling in, Andrew. [28:31.520 --> 28:32.520] Take care. [28:32.520 --> 28:33.520] You too. [28:33.520 --> 28:34.520] All right. [28:34.520 --> 28:37.640] Now we're going to go to Robert in Pennsylvania. [28:37.640 --> 28:42.320] Robert, I got about a minute before I've got to put you on hold to go to break. [28:42.320 --> 28:43.320] So what do you got? [28:43.320 --> 28:44.320] Okay. [28:44.320 --> 28:47.320] Thank you, Eddie, for taking my call. [28:47.320 --> 28:53.240] Like I said, Robert, Pennsylvania, my wife got a...the issue here is my wife got a speeding [28:53.240 --> 28:56.640] ticket on the 17th of this month. [28:56.640 --> 29:03.080] And there's a few things I'd like to go over that I'd like to go over with you, if I could. [29:03.080 --> 29:07.000] Some things he wrote on the ticket and other things that happened when we went to contest [29:07.000 --> 29:09.640] it. [29:09.640 --> 29:17.080] One of the things that he wrote, using radar, he caught my wife doing, obviously, speeding [29:17.080 --> 29:18.080] in a 35. [29:18.080 --> 29:20.720] But he wrote two different speeds on her ticket. [29:20.720 --> 29:23.720] He wrote 41 in a 35. [29:23.720 --> 29:28.400] And then in the remarks section, he wrote actual speed 54 in a 35. [29:28.400 --> 29:36.640] So I'm thinking, well, which is the correct speed, 41 or 54, is he lying about one, is [29:36.640 --> 29:40.040] he falsifying the document, is he doing what I'm saying? [29:40.040 --> 29:41.040] Yeah. [29:41.040 --> 29:42.040] I see what you're saying. [29:42.040 --> 29:44.640] Hang on just a second, and I will try to address that on the other side. [29:44.640 --> 29:45.640] Okay? [29:45.640 --> 29:46.640] All right, folks. [29:46.640 --> 29:47.640] This is Rule of Law Radio. [29:47.640 --> 29:48.640] The call in number is 512-646-1984. [29:48.640 --> 29:49.640] Y'all give us a call, because we need to talk. [29:49.640 --> 29:50.640] We'll be right back. [29:50.640 --> 29:51.640] Giving thanks isn't just good manners. [29:51.640 --> 29:52.640] There's something to do on Thanksgiving. [29:52.640 --> 29:53.640] New research suggests gratitude is actually good for your health. [29:53.640 --> 29:54.640] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [29:54.640 --> 29:55.640] Back to explain the benefits of a heartfelt thank you in a moment. [29:55.640 --> 29:56.640] Privacy is under a lot of pressure. [29:56.640 --> 29:57.640] It's not just about giving thanks. [29:57.640 --> 29:58.640] It's not just about giving thanks. [29:58.640 --> 29:59.640] It's not just about giving thanks. [29:59.640 --> 30:00.640] It's not just about giving thanks. [30:00.640 --> 30:01.640] It's not just about giving thanks. [30:01.640 --> 30:02.640] It's not just about giving thanks. [30:02.640 --> 30:03.640] It's not just about giving thanks. [30:03.640 --> 30:04.640] It's not just about giving thanks. [30:04.640 --> 30:27.640] It's not just about giving thanks. [30:27.640 --> 30:45.640] Thank you. [30:45.640 --> 30:49.840] They're just two simple words, but new research suggests gratitude not only improves your [30:49.840 --> 30:56.200] social life, it actually reduces stress and produces tangible physical and mental benefits. [30:56.200 --> 30:59.880] Scientists looked at heart attack patients and found that those who became more appreciative [30:59.880 --> 31:04.040] of life actually reduced their risk of suffering another attack. [31:04.040 --> 31:07.520] The same went for patients with neuromuscular disorders. [31:07.520 --> 31:12.400] Those who jotted down five things they were grateful for slept better and had less discomfort [31:12.400 --> 31:15.600] than the patients who wrote down five daily hassles. [31:15.600 --> 31:18.800] So let's all focus on the positive and show a little more gratitude. [31:18.800 --> 31:20.800] Oh, and thank you for listening. [31:20.800 --> 31:21.800] I really appreciate it. [31:21.800 --> 31:27.840] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [31:27.840 --> 31:33.400] What are you thinking? [31:33.400 --> 31:38.880] Microplant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month. [31:38.880 --> 31:44.480] Infusa.org has 12 formulations of microplant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from [31:44.480 --> 31:49.200] your kidney, liver, blood, lung, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever. [31:49.200 --> 31:54.160] It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products, that saves you [31:54.160 --> 31:55.760] space, time, and money. [31:55.760 --> 31:59.560] Call 888-910-4367 only at infusa.org. [31:59.560 --> 32:05.800] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [32:05.800 --> 32:09.440] In today's America, we live in an us against them society, and if we the people are ever [32:09.440 --> 32:13.360] going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:13.360 --> 32:16.840] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [32:16.840 --> 32:20.880] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:20.880 --> 32:24.720] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [32:24.720 --> 32:26.200] our rights through due process. [32:26.200 --> 32:30.080] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the [32:30.080 --> 32:33.880] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [32:33.880 --> 32:36.240] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:36.240 --> 32:40.240] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [32:40.240 --> 32:41.580] ordering your copy today. [32:41.580 --> 32:44.840] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [32:44.840 --> 32:49.360] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [32:49.360 --> 32:51.240] documents and other useful resource material. [32:51.240 --> 32:55.640] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:55.640 --> 33:03.240] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:03.240 --> 33:29.640] Live Free Speech Radio, logosradionetwork.com. [33:29.640 --> 33:36.360] All right, folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984. [33:36.360 --> 33:38.600] We are talking to Robert in Pennsylvania. [33:38.600 --> 33:40.240] Robert, let's continue on. [33:40.240 --> 33:44.180] All right, there's two tickets, there's two speeds on the speeding ticket. [33:44.180 --> 33:50.920] One is the actual alleged speed, the other in the comments is a different speed. [33:50.920 --> 33:58.480] Sounds to me like he was doing what they like to refer to as cutting her a break and cited [33:58.480 --> 34:04.600] her for a lesser speed rather than the higher speed. [34:04.600 --> 34:10.080] So it all is going to come down to what they actually put in the complaint or what they [34:10.080 --> 34:12.840] actually try to use in court. [34:12.840 --> 34:14.160] Okay. [34:14.160 --> 34:21.160] So, because I can't argue this for my wife, she's going to, would that be something to [34:21.160 --> 34:27.040] go after in court, ask the officer which speed was it and which one was true, which one was [34:27.040 --> 34:28.040] falsified? [34:28.040 --> 34:32.560] If you do that, then they can turn around and try to make the higher one the one that [34:32.560 --> 34:39.160] they go after her for if that's the case because there's nothing there that makes them contradictory. [34:39.160 --> 34:45.120] One is what he's actually charging her with versus the other is a comment on what he could [34:45.120 --> 34:47.480] have charged her with. [34:47.480 --> 34:48.480] You see the difference? [34:48.480 --> 34:49.480] Gotcha. [34:49.480 --> 34:50.480] Gotcha. [34:50.480 --> 34:56.440] Okay, the other thing on this ticket, Eddie, is that while the trooper put his name in [34:56.440 --> 35:01.320] block letters, he didn't sign it, it just says e-file, is that legal? [35:01.320 --> 35:06.520] Is there anything in the statute that says that they can do it? [35:06.520 --> 35:12.240] I recall, I can't, off the top of my head, I can't recall the statute and number, but [35:12.240 --> 35:17.920] I seem to recall it had to be signed and not digitally anything. [35:17.920 --> 35:23.600] Well, the thing is the statute, if there's a statute that allows them to electronically [35:23.600 --> 35:29.280] file the ticket, then there has to be a provision in the statute to allow them to simply sign [35:29.280 --> 35:38.160] it by a pre-printed name rather than an actual signature or it's signed with a captured digital [35:38.160 --> 35:39.160] signature. [35:39.160 --> 35:44.120] In other words, it's a mimic signature of their handwriting, their actual signature [35:44.120 --> 35:49.360] and it's stamped onto it internally even though it's not on the copy given to her. [35:49.360 --> 35:50.360] Gotcha. [35:50.360 --> 35:53.920] Okay, and that might be the case there too. [35:53.920 --> 35:54.920] Okay. [35:54.920 --> 35:55.920] All right. [35:55.920 --> 36:00.720] So her only defense when she goes to argue this ticket is going to be that she wasn't [36:00.720 --> 36:03.920] engaging in transportation. [36:03.920 --> 36:08.240] If she did not provide him with any of the information he was demanding that relates [36:08.240 --> 36:09.240] to it, yes. [36:09.240 --> 36:14.600] If she gave it up to him, that argument is going to get run over, guaranteed. [36:14.600 --> 36:18.160] Ah, even though her driver's license says not commercial. [36:18.160 --> 36:19.160] Correct. [36:19.160 --> 36:21.880] It says no CDL on it. [36:21.880 --> 36:27.640] Yeah, but no CDL is going to be, it just means, okay, you have to understand the difference [36:27.640 --> 36:30.000] between the licenses. [36:30.000 --> 36:33.960] All a CDL is, they're all commercial, all of them. [36:33.960 --> 36:40.640] All no CDL means is that she is not allowed to operate any type of vehicle that requires [36:40.640 --> 36:42.680] a CDL. [36:42.680 --> 36:49.600] It doesn't mean simply that it's not a CDL license, it means because it's not a CDL license, [36:49.600 --> 36:53.400] she cannot be operating anything that a CDL is required for. [36:53.400 --> 36:54.400] Gotcha. [36:54.400 --> 36:55.400] Okay, I understand. [36:55.400 --> 37:01.600] I'll look more into the statutes about that. [37:01.600 --> 37:05.200] There's something else that I wanted to talk to you about. [37:05.200 --> 37:12.120] When we went to contest this ticket, there were three people in that office that of course [37:12.120 --> 37:15.080] didn't seem to know what they were doing. [37:15.080 --> 37:19.800] Are you talking about the work there? [37:19.800 --> 37:24.760] Well we're, the Magisterial District where we went to... [37:24.760 --> 37:28.920] Yeah, but the three people you're talking about in court, did they work for the court [37:28.920 --> 37:31.520] or were they people like you and your wife? [37:31.520 --> 37:37.880] Well, actually, it wasn't a court, we went up to the window at the Magisterial District. [37:37.880 --> 37:42.320] We had to go enter a plea or guilty or not guilty and we were at the window. [37:42.320 --> 37:43.320] Okay. [37:43.320 --> 37:49.800] And I was asking them some questions, how can we contest it, do we have to please, there's [37:49.800 --> 37:56.600] a judge here, I even asked them if they read Title 75 and they got very upset that I was [37:56.600 --> 38:01.040] asking them questions and apparently I had intimidated them because when my wife and [38:01.040 --> 38:07.120] I left the car, a trooper zipped into the parking lot here, glanced in my direction [38:07.120 --> 38:09.480] and hurried in. [38:09.480 --> 38:13.240] So I said to my wife, I said, well, you know, I think this guy's coming for me so I'm going [38:13.240 --> 38:17.320] to get out on the highway here because I think I know what's up. [38:17.320 --> 38:23.600] And not even three minutes later, my wife's phone number rang because we had written her [38:23.600 --> 38:27.920] number on the citation so they could call us with a court date. [38:27.920 --> 38:33.280] The trooper got that phone number off the ticket and called my wife's phone while we're [38:33.280 --> 38:34.880] in the car. [38:34.880 --> 38:40.240] And he said, it said, can I speak to such-and-such person, me? [38:40.240 --> 38:44.880] And my wife put me on speakerphone and I told the officer, listen, it's not a speakerphone, [38:44.880 --> 38:49.760] I'm not holding a phone so you can't get me for using a cell phone while driving because [38:49.760 --> 38:50.760] that's in Pennsylvania. [38:50.760 --> 38:55.960] And he said, well, I'm trooper so-and-so, did you come in here and cause a scene? [38:55.960 --> 39:00.360] I said, I don't know what you're talking about because the lady here said you caused a scene. [39:00.360 --> 39:04.080] I said, well, tell you what, officer, and he said, I'm a trooper. [39:04.080 --> 39:09.240] So I'll tell you what, officer, why don't you have her swear out a complaint and we'll [39:09.240 --> 39:10.240] go from there. [39:10.240 --> 39:15.160] He said, no, I want you to come back here and talk about this. [39:15.160 --> 39:19.520] I said, well, is that a, are you ordering me back there? [39:19.520 --> 39:22.640] And he said, well, I just want you to come back and we'll talk about this. [39:22.640 --> 39:26.960] I said, well, you know, like I said, I'm not going to go back here and talk with you about [39:26.960 --> 39:27.960] it. [39:27.960 --> 39:30.280] And if she wants to swear out a complaint, we'll go from there. [39:30.280 --> 39:36.480] But also, officer, there's a camera in there, in the lobby, and you should probably go take [39:36.480 --> 39:38.840] a look at that and see if I made a scene. [39:38.840 --> 39:42.960] And I think you'll find out I didn't make any scene at all. [39:42.960 --> 39:46.960] But my wife is a little worried about that, but I wasn't at all. [39:46.960 --> 39:48.960] And nothing has happened as a result. [39:48.960 --> 39:53.960] But I'm going to ask you, Eddie, does that sound like harassment to you? [39:53.960 --> 39:54.960] Absolutely not. [39:54.960 --> 39:55.960] They're public servants. [39:55.960 --> 39:58.120] You're absolutely entitled to ask questions of them. [39:58.120 --> 40:01.740] The fact that they don't want to answer them does not give them the right to maliciously [40:01.740 --> 40:06.360] prosecute or complain against you for something that didn't actually happen. [40:06.360 --> 40:12.960] See, the problem is, is they're used to everybody just going, okay, no problem, master. [40:12.960 --> 40:17.720] I mean, they think that all they have to do is rub their government lamp, and you pop [40:17.720 --> 40:20.560] out of it and go, what is your wish, master? [40:20.560 --> 40:27.000] Which I tell everybody, I said, listen, the cops are our servants, and we need to treat [40:27.000 --> 40:29.000] them as such. [40:29.000 --> 40:37.560] But what I want to ask is that he called and asked me questions on my wife's cell phone [40:37.560 --> 40:40.640] that wouldn't be construed as harassment on his part? [40:40.640 --> 40:46.400] Well, I mean, he basically did the exact same thing you did, right? [40:46.400 --> 40:51.900] What do you mean, asked about the ticket? [40:51.900 --> 40:54.480] He called and asked questions, right? [40:54.480 --> 40:56.520] Okay, that's true. [40:56.520 --> 40:58.080] He didn't threaten you. [40:58.080 --> 41:02.800] He didn't make unreasonable demands and order you to do something he had no authority to [41:02.800 --> 41:04.280] do, did he? [41:04.280 --> 41:06.640] No, he didn't. [41:06.640 --> 41:12.160] So if he didn't threaten and he didn't order unlawfully, how's it harassing any more than [41:12.160 --> 41:13.160] what you did? [41:13.160 --> 41:16.800] Okay, I see what you mean. [41:16.800 --> 41:21.160] Don't fall into the same game they're trying to do to cause a problem, because that's all [41:21.160 --> 41:22.160] they're trying to do. [41:22.160 --> 41:25.160] Exactly, I agree. [41:25.160 --> 41:34.840] Well, okay, we have a court date on the 22nd of next month, and I got to give my wife some [41:34.840 --> 41:36.400] ideas on how to fight this ticket. [41:36.400 --> 41:42.360] But like you said, she already gave up her driver's license, her vehicle driver's license, [41:42.360 --> 41:45.520] and that's going to be a tough road to hoe. [41:45.520 --> 41:47.520] Yeah, it is. [41:47.520 --> 41:53.040] And like I say, I tell everyone, don't do that until you have done the research, the [41:53.040 --> 41:58.120] study, and are confident you can go to court and do the right thing the right way. [41:58.120 --> 42:03.240] To do anything else is fight club suicide. [42:03.240 --> 42:05.760] Okay, I got you. [42:05.760 --> 42:09.760] All right, Eddie, thank you for talking with me, and you have a good night. [42:09.760 --> 42:10.760] Yes, sir, you too. [42:10.760 --> 42:11.760] Thanks for calling. [42:11.760 --> 42:16.440] All right, now we're going to go to Jimmy in Maryland. [42:16.440 --> 42:21.680] Jimmy, I've got about a minute with you before I have to go to break. [42:21.680 --> 42:23.280] So let's get started. [42:23.280 --> 42:25.960] Okay, how you doing, Eddie? [42:25.960 --> 42:26.960] All right, and you? [42:26.960 --> 42:30.360] Oh, I'm hanging in there, Eddie, hanging in there. [42:30.360 --> 42:33.960] I had a court appearance last week. [42:33.960 --> 42:38.600] It was, I called you a couple months ago, blown headlight, I was put off for blown headlight, [42:38.600 --> 42:39.600] which we know is not criminal. [42:39.600 --> 42:40.600] Yeah. [42:40.600 --> 42:45.200] And they got the wrong date of birth, they use a sound-deck number that is not me. [42:45.200 --> 42:51.200] And I went to court, you know, I did like you said, the first thing I did, you know, [42:51.200 --> 42:54.840] was I challenged the jurisdiction of the court, I said, I'm here, I'm here especially to challenge [42:54.840 --> 42:55.840] the jurisdiction of the court. [42:55.840 --> 43:00.840] And so the judge looks at the prosecutor, and looks for the prosecutor, they say, well, [43:00.840 --> 43:01.840] we haven't talked to Mr. Lee yet. [43:01.840 --> 43:06.480] Obviously, they don't want to talk to you, I'll just, you know, just go sit in and we'll [43:06.480 --> 43:07.480] call you back up later. [43:07.480 --> 43:12.400] So we had a recess, he didn't talk to me, but he went through everybody else, and then [43:12.400 --> 43:16.360] I'm the last one to come back up again, and then I did the same again, I'm here especially [43:16.360 --> 43:17.360] to challenge the jurisdiction of the court. [43:17.360 --> 43:21.800] And he looked at the, you know, the prosecutor again, the prosecutor raised his hand, and [43:21.800 --> 43:26.800] he puffed on his breath, shh, shh, shh, shh, and then the judge just goes, just goes over, [43:26.800 --> 43:27.800] yacking at me. [43:27.800 --> 43:33.200] Wait a minute, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, the judge spoke to the prosecutor where you [43:33.200 --> 43:34.200] could not hear it. [43:34.200 --> 43:40.200] So the prosecutor said on his breath that I couldn't hear what he said, I don't think [43:40.200 --> 43:41.200] it's an event. [43:41.200 --> 43:46.200] Okay, well, hang on just a second, and we'll talk about that when we get back, Jimmy, okay? [43:46.200 --> 43:47.200] All right. [43:47.200 --> 43:48.200] Folks, call in number 512-646-1984. [43:48.200 --> 43:54.120] This is Rule of Law Radio, your host, Eddie Craig. [43:54.120 --> 43:57.120] We will be right back, so y'all hang in there. [43:57.120 --> 44:06.440] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [44:06.440 --> 44:13.200] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course [44:13.200 --> 44:17.360] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [44:17.360 --> 44:20.960] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [44:20.960 --> 44:25.200] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [44:25.200 --> 44:30.920] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [44:30.920 --> 44:36.840] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:36.840 --> 44:41.400] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the [44:41.400 --> 44:45.680] principles and practices that control our American courts. [44:45.680 --> 44:51.880] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [44:51.880 --> 44:54.200] pro se tactics, and much more. [44:54.200 --> 45:02.280] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner, or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [45:02.280 --> 45:11.280] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come back [45:11.280 --> 45:16.320] and buy our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D, here in Austin, Texas, behind Brave [45:16.320 --> 45:20.280] New Books and J-Pain, to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very [45:20.280 --> 45:21.280] own eyes. [45:21.280 --> 45:26.160] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [45:26.160 --> 45:30.160] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil, [45:30.160 --> 45:33.880] lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [45:33.880 --> 45:40.880] Call 512-264-4043, or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. [45:40.880 --> 45:46.720] That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. [45:46.720 --> 45:50.920] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products. [45:50.920 --> 46:20.400] Naturespureorganics.com. [46:21.400 --> 46:39.760] All right, folks, we are back. [46:39.760 --> 46:41.560] This is Rule of Law Radio. [46:41.560 --> 46:44.640] All right, we are talking to Jimmy in Maryland. [46:44.640 --> 46:47.040] All right, Jimmy, continue on, please. [46:47.040 --> 46:48.040] Okay. [46:48.040 --> 46:53.720] I come, I approach to this second time, I'm here to challenge the jurisdiction of this [46:53.720 --> 46:54.720] court. [46:54.720 --> 46:56.720] I mean, especially challenge the jurisdiction of this court. [46:56.720 --> 46:59.720] The prosecutor said something under his breath, very low, that nobody here would accept it, [46:59.720 --> 47:04.960] and he just raised his hand, and we were, something like that, and then the judge just [47:04.960 --> 47:08.920] raised his voice and started yacking at me, and, you know, like kind of threatened me, [47:08.920 --> 47:10.920] and I said, I said, I'm moving to the Smith. [47:10.920 --> 47:11.920] Didn't I? [47:11.920 --> 47:12.920] No cause of action. [47:12.920 --> 47:13.920] Didn't I? [47:13.920 --> 47:14.920] I failed to say the claim. [47:14.920 --> 47:15.920] Didn't I? [47:15.920 --> 47:18.920] I said, I said, I didn't, I didn't, I didn't, I didn't, I didn't. [47:18.920 --> 47:21.440] And he said, you know, you're scheduled to go to trial today. [47:21.440 --> 47:28.080] You're going to trial right now, you know, basically, and I officially said, I want this [47:28.080 --> 47:33.680] case in a court of record, and, you know, and I went and prayed for it, for a jury trial. [47:33.680 --> 47:37.680] Cause, you know, the district court here in Maryland is just a de novo court, and I don't [47:37.680 --> 47:41.160] want them to know what I want to do prior. [47:41.160 --> 47:43.320] So I did that, and I have a status hearing. [47:43.320 --> 47:49.160] They call it initial appearance or status hearing next week where I'm planning to file [47:49.160 --> 47:55.280] a false complaint for adjunctive release and probably even put in for a Frank's hearing. [47:55.280 --> 48:00.240] That's the direction I think I want to go in this matter because I need to challenge [48:00.240 --> 48:01.240] that complaint. [48:01.240 --> 48:03.240] He said he positively ID'd me. [48:03.240 --> 48:05.120] I gave him no driver's license. [48:05.120 --> 48:11.040] My driver's license was reset back in 1998, so I had no driver's license to give him. [48:11.040 --> 48:16.360] He's saying he probably identified me in a date and I had somebody with me in the car [48:16.360 --> 48:23.480] that can confer that my name, my date of birth I gave him was not what I was cited with. [48:23.480 --> 48:31.680] Well, you can always move to quash the complaint because it has the wrong name on it. [48:31.680 --> 48:39.120] Okay, so I can move to quash the complaint and what it means... [48:39.120 --> 48:44.840] Let me ask you this, have you and the cop seen each other since the ticket was issued? [48:44.840 --> 48:50.320] No, just at court, that was it. [48:50.320 --> 48:54.680] So the court now knows who you are? [48:54.680 --> 48:58.760] Well, they think they do. [48:58.760 --> 49:02.680] Well, I mean as far as they know your face. [49:02.680 --> 49:06.880] Now whether or not they will remember from date to date, that's another question. [49:06.880 --> 49:07.880] Right. [49:07.880 --> 49:08.880] Okay. [49:08.880 --> 49:11.320] So who do you know that looks a whole lot like you? [49:11.320 --> 49:18.800] I don't know anybody that looks a whole lot like me. [49:18.800 --> 49:21.560] Well try to find somebody. [49:21.560 --> 49:30.080] And then on the day you go to court, do they do this up in Maryland, do they ask the witness [49:30.080 --> 49:34.160] on the stand to identify the accused in open court? [49:34.160 --> 49:36.560] Yes, they do. [49:36.560 --> 49:37.560] Okay. [49:37.560 --> 49:39.720] So you have that person stand in for you. [49:39.720 --> 49:45.520] You don't go up front, they do, especially if it's in front of a judge and a prosecutor [49:45.520 --> 49:48.320] that's never seen you before. [49:48.320 --> 49:53.080] And then when they ask, do you see the defendant, what are they going to do? [49:53.080 --> 49:56.520] They're going to point to the only person isolated in the courtroom at the defendant's [49:56.520 --> 49:57.520] table. [49:57.520 --> 49:58.520] Right? [49:58.520 --> 49:59.520] Right. [49:59.520 --> 50:04.520] And then all that person has to do is stand up and say, excuse me judge, but that's not [50:04.520 --> 50:05.520] who I am. [50:05.520 --> 50:07.360] See, here's my ID. [50:07.360 --> 50:12.320] The officer just identified the wrong person as the perpetrator of the crime according [50:12.320 --> 50:15.160] to the complaint that you have. [50:15.160 --> 50:20.760] You just made the officer a completely unreliable witness in open court. [50:20.760 --> 50:22.960] Okay. [50:22.960 --> 50:27.040] Now do be aware, courts are vindictive snotbags. [50:27.040 --> 50:33.160] And so they might try to charge you or this person with contempt. [50:33.160 --> 50:37.280] But there shouldn't be a viable way to do that considering you always have the complaint [50:37.280 --> 50:42.120] that the identification process was rigged against the accused by being conducted in [50:42.120 --> 50:46.320] open court against a person in an isolated lineup. [50:46.320 --> 50:47.320] Uh-huh. [50:47.320 --> 50:51.360] I hear what you're saying. [50:51.360 --> 50:52.360] Okay. [50:52.360 --> 50:53.360] So. [50:53.360 --> 51:00.640] I mean, it would be really fun to have the cop, oh yeah, that was him right there. [51:00.640 --> 51:03.560] I remember him clearly. [51:03.560 --> 51:08.160] And then you stand up and back in the courtroom, uh, judge, we've got a problem. [51:08.160 --> 51:09.160] Yeah. [51:09.160 --> 51:13.880] But think about it, Eddie, the prosecutor, um, this is the same prosecutor I had before [51:13.880 --> 51:16.640] in a previous case that I'm, that's in appeal. [51:16.640 --> 51:21.400] So it's like somebody assigned this prosecutor to me, the same guy. [51:21.400 --> 51:24.640] So I'm thinking, and thinking since he knows who I am, that might, that might wouldn't [51:24.640 --> 51:25.640] work. [51:25.640 --> 51:27.400] It may be. [51:27.400 --> 51:33.300] But the fact of the matter is, you know, you can always raise the objection. [51:33.300 --> 51:38.960] Even if you're the one upfront when they do it, get it in the record, object to it, objection. [51:38.960 --> 51:42.800] This is a rigged identification process against the accused. [51:42.800 --> 51:47.120] Who else is the officer going to point at except for the only individual isolated at [51:47.120 --> 51:48.760] this table? [51:48.760 --> 51:50.240] This is proof positive. [51:50.240 --> 51:51.720] This whole thing is rigged. [51:51.720 --> 51:52.720] Uh-huh. [51:52.720 --> 51:56.520] Well, let me tell you how this came about. [51:56.520 --> 52:03.520] It was, when I was, when I was arrested in the previous case, the, um, this officer, [52:03.520 --> 52:07.280] this, this is when I went to court and lost the case, the officer cited me in the court [52:07.280 --> 52:08.640] parking lot. [52:08.640 --> 52:12.960] And when they, they took me, took me downtown, um, I stole the, the girl that was standing [52:12.960 --> 52:16.920] for me that, that's not my true name and it's not my true date of birth. [52:16.920 --> 52:20.560] And they told me to sit down and they, they tried to call the officer back in to fix, [52:20.560 --> 52:22.640] correct what he did because what he did was an error. [52:22.640 --> 52:23.640] He said he wasn't coming. [52:23.640 --> 52:28.160] So they went ahead and processed it anyway, so in their records, they got this messed [52:28.160 --> 52:29.160] information. [52:29.160 --> 52:35.280] And when I went to court, I, you know, like they, they, um, the, the, the, the, they allowed [52:35.280 --> 52:41.120] the prosecutor to combine both found it, you know, both sound decks, just, you know, they [52:41.120 --> 52:42.120] call it amending. [52:42.120 --> 52:43.120] They put everything together. [52:43.120 --> 52:44.120] It's just, it's just erroneous. [52:44.120 --> 52:45.120] And the judge still allowed it. [52:45.120 --> 52:50.120] And so I'm just going through to fill the process with it right now. [52:50.120 --> 52:51.120] Yeah. [52:51.120 --> 52:52.120] Well. [52:52.120 --> 52:53.720] It's crazy down here, man. [52:53.720 --> 52:55.200] It's crazy everywhere. [52:55.200 --> 52:58.200] Believe me. [52:58.200 --> 53:06.140] I mean, you're, you're definitely not unique in the abuse, but at least it sounds like [53:06.140 --> 53:09.480] you've done the work to know enough to know how they're messing up. [53:09.480 --> 53:13.080] And all you've got to do is keep documenting it and objecting to it. [53:13.080 --> 53:18.480] That at least gives you a proper record for appeal on the due process violations. [53:18.480 --> 53:23.800] But when they do the ID portion of that in court, object to it, object to it to being [53:23.800 --> 53:28.000] biased and prejudice against the accused and rigged for the outcome. [53:28.000 --> 53:29.000] Yeah, definitely. [53:29.000 --> 53:30.000] They will. [53:30.000 --> 53:35.400] And then I'm wondering, um, on my status hearing, I, I, you mentioned a couple weeks ago that [53:35.400 --> 53:42.080] I also have a, uh, what they call a hearing to go through to, to justify, um, violation [53:42.080 --> 53:43.080] of probation. [53:43.080 --> 53:47.600] Because, you know, um, I had to take it to the next court, you know, I lost the appeal [53:47.600 --> 53:49.480] and I take it to the next level. [53:49.480 --> 53:51.280] And now they, I guess they trying to get money out of it. [53:51.280 --> 53:55.400] So I gotta let them know, um, I got a six to eight, uh, extension that took the file [53:55.400 --> 53:57.200] in the, in the upper court. [53:57.200 --> 54:00.480] And I guess that's what's in it on time, but I'm concerned that if they so tricky, they [54:00.480 --> 54:04.920] might try to set me in two different courts at the same time, because on the same day. [54:04.920 --> 54:05.920] They might. [54:05.920 --> 54:09.160] And all you have to do is make sure that you object to that in writing if it's what they [54:09.160 --> 54:10.160] do. [54:10.160 --> 54:11.160] Okay. [54:11.160 --> 54:15.040] Well, I will know that I can try to go online and see, but the only way I can know that [54:15.040 --> 54:18.600] is that the deco that's down there and where they have the cases. [54:18.600 --> 54:23.960] They don't give you notice beforehand of when and where they gave me a notice up here, but [54:23.960 --> 54:25.560] it's not, but I don't, I won't know that. [54:25.560 --> 54:26.920] I don't know the courtroom. [54:26.920 --> 54:32.600] They have a monitor that they have the cases listed and at the data of the court case, [54:32.600 --> 54:36.000] you go down and you see where you are on the monitor and this is in a circuit court. [54:36.000 --> 54:38.120] This court is different from the circuit court. [54:38.120 --> 54:40.360] So I have no way of knowing what courtroom is there. [54:40.360 --> 54:46.440] I know what judges is, but I don't know what courtroom is going to be in. [54:46.440 --> 54:52.320] Well then the best thing you can do is have something prepared in writing for either place [54:52.320 --> 54:56.640] and just fill it in and file it asking for a continuous because you have an appearance [54:56.640 --> 55:01.720] in the, in a different court at the same time and you can't be in two places at once and [55:01.720 --> 55:06.280] the system is well aware of that. [55:06.280 --> 55:14.040] The law cannot create an impossibility for both cases. [55:14.040 --> 55:19.840] No you can, whichever one you appear in, you have to make them aware that you're filing [55:19.840 --> 55:24.720] in the other case that you were required to appear before that room, whichever one you [55:24.720 --> 55:25.720] choose to be in. [55:25.720 --> 55:26.720] Okay. [55:26.720 --> 55:33.140] Try to get something filed in the other one that says you're making an appearance in another [55:33.140 --> 55:38.480] courtroom simultaneously with the one today and the law cannot create an impossibility [55:38.480 --> 55:42.520] for you to be in two places at once. [55:42.520 --> 55:50.040] So file it in the one you're not going to that day. [55:50.040 --> 56:00.840] If that's what they do, I don't know, I would appear in the one that's the most serious [56:00.840 --> 56:05.760] allegation and let the lesser one be the one I file in. [56:05.760 --> 56:06.760] That would be my perspective. [56:06.760 --> 56:07.760] Okay. [56:07.760 --> 56:14.080] So I probably should put that, just to justify, file a probation, I guess that's when I probably [56:14.080 --> 56:19.040] shouldn't go in and file for that and appear in the status or initial appearance place. [56:19.040 --> 56:20.040] Right. [56:20.040 --> 56:21.040] Status hearing or initial appearance. [56:21.040 --> 56:22.040] Yeah. [56:22.040 --> 56:23.040] Okay. [56:23.040 --> 56:27.600] So I will have to use that case number so I'll file in, I got you. [56:27.600 --> 56:31.720] Yeah, but also with the other one, I never received, I mean I received it in the mail [56:31.720 --> 56:36.760] but I was going to, you know, objections that came up that I never received appropriate [56:36.760 --> 56:37.760] service. [56:37.760 --> 56:43.320] They just mailed it, I never received it from a certified mail or a process server to serve. [56:43.320 --> 56:46.880] Are they allowed to just mail it? [56:46.880 --> 56:49.000] Are they allowed to just mail it? [56:49.000 --> 56:50.000] No. [56:50.000 --> 56:53.680] Yeah, then file a written objection to it. [56:53.680 --> 56:54.680] Lack of proper notice. [56:54.680 --> 56:58.000] Okay, you can do that too. [56:58.000 --> 56:59.000] Okay. [56:59.000 --> 57:00.000] Yeah. [57:00.000 --> 57:03.920] Remember, anytime they do something wrong, write it down and file it. [57:03.920 --> 57:04.920] Okay. [57:04.920 --> 57:08.440] So you're saying with the... [57:08.440 --> 57:12.000] You write it down as a written objective notice. [57:12.000 --> 57:13.000] Notice of objection. [57:13.000 --> 57:14.000] Okay. [57:14.000 --> 57:17.000] Notice of objection and then file that. [57:17.000 --> 57:20.800] So now you're saying just do that then, just file a notice of objection because I wasn't [57:20.800 --> 57:21.800] properly served? [57:21.800 --> 57:25.960] Well, I can do both of them because I still got to be in two places at once. [57:25.960 --> 57:29.000] Absolutely, document them both but only appear in one. [57:29.000 --> 57:34.240] Just make sure that the commentary is there that due to a conflict, I had to appear in [57:34.240 --> 57:38.880] this room while I was simultaneously being required to appear in a second. [57:38.880 --> 57:45.360] The law has thus created a legal impossibility and intends to penalize me for it. [57:45.360 --> 57:49.080] Okay, I got you. [57:49.080 --> 57:50.080] I got you. [57:50.080 --> 57:53.640] Thanks a lot, I appreciate that, Eddie. [57:53.640 --> 57:54.640] You're very welcome, man. [57:54.640 --> 57:55.640] Good luck. [57:55.640 --> 57:56.640] I'll keep you posted. [57:56.640 --> 57:57.640] All right, good. [57:57.640 --> 57:58.640] You'll get them. [57:58.640 --> 58:02.880] All right, folks, we're at the top of the hour break. [58:02.880 --> 58:07.600] Dusty, Josh, Armando, I see you there, y'all hang on and I'll pick you up after the break [58:07.600 --> 58:08.600] is over. [58:08.600 --> 58:14.080] This is the Monday night rule of law radio show and we've got it pumping now. [58:14.080 --> 58:21.760] So y'all keep calling 512-646-1984 and I will try to get as many of y'all dealt with as [58:21.760 --> 58:50.440] we possibly can after the top of the hour, so y'all hold on. [58:50.440 --> 58:55.880] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated [58:55.880 --> 58:58.680] because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.680 --> 59:04.080] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise [59:04.080 --> 59:07.320] the profound meaning of the scripture. [59:07.320 --> 59:09.080] Enter the recovery version. [59:09.080 --> 59:15.000] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more [59:15.000 --> 59:18.760] than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.760 --> 59:23.920] Most profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into [59:23.920 --> 59:28.440] the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.440 --> 59:33.600] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.600 --> 59:44.040] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:44.040 --> 59:48.080] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:48.080 --> 01:00:03.200] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradio network.com. [01:00:03.200 --> 01:00:08.040] This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates, online [01:00:08.040 --> 01:00:09.880] at thelibertybeat.com. [01:00:09.880 --> 01:00:14.720] I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, September 29th, 2014. [01:00:14.720 --> 01:00:23.640] Gold opened today at $1,220, silver opened at $17.51, and Bitcoin is trading around $373.13. [01:00:23.640 --> 01:00:28.000] Today's Bitcoin price brought to you by Express Coin, the fastest and most reliable way to [01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:29.320] buy Bitcoin. [01:00:29.320 --> 01:00:32.640] Buy Bitcoin today at expresscoin.com. [01:00:32.640 --> 01:00:36.720] Support for Liberty Beat comes from the Michael Cargill for Austin City Council District 1 [01:00:36.720 --> 01:00:37.720] campaign. [01:00:37.720 --> 01:00:40.040] Vote Michael Cargill to get the cars moving. [01:00:40.040 --> 01:00:44.400] Learn more or sign up to volunteer at cargillfortexas.com. [01:00:44.400 --> 01:00:47.120] That's political advertisement paid for by the Michael Cargill for Austin City Council [01:00:47.120 --> 01:00:48.820] District 1 campaign. [01:00:48.820 --> 01:00:52.880] In the news today, civilians were killed while militants were wounded following Sunday night [01:00:52.880 --> 01:00:55.880] airstrikes in northern and eastern Syria. [01:00:55.880 --> 01:01:00.440] That word from the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which is monitoring the [01:01:00.440 --> 01:01:01.440] war. [01:01:01.440 --> 01:01:05.440] According to the observatory, the airstrikes hit grain silos, mills, and other such targets [01:01:05.440 --> 01:01:07.840] instead of an Islamic State operations base. [01:01:07.840 --> 01:01:14.280] Reuters reports there has been no word from the Obama administration regarding the claims. [01:01:14.280 --> 01:01:19.840] On Saturday, hundreds of pro-Palestine protesters blocked an Israeli cargo ship from unloading [01:01:19.840 --> 01:01:21.680] at the port of Oakland. [01:01:21.680 --> 01:01:25.480] Protesters wanted to express their anger with Israel's bombing of Palestinians in Gaza. [01:01:25.480 --> 01:01:29.560] The Stop Zim Action Committee organized the action against the Zim Shanghai ship. [01:01:29.560 --> 01:01:33.760] The protest marks the second time Israeli cargo ships were blocked after similar actions [01:01:33.760 --> 01:01:37.240] in California and Florida last month. [01:01:37.240 --> 01:01:41.760] Tomorrow, the activist group Fluoride Free Houston will be returning to the Houston City [01:01:41.760 --> 01:01:45.880] Council in a relaunched effort to end the practice of water fluoridation. [01:01:45.880 --> 01:01:50.080] The group first began lobbying the city in the summer of 2012, receiving support from [01:01:50.080 --> 01:01:51.480] two council members. [01:01:51.480 --> 01:01:55.880] Mayor Annise Parker, known for her environmental efforts, has yet to support the group. [01:01:55.880 --> 01:01:59.320] With the new campaign, the group hopes to educate Houston City Council members about [01:01:59.320 --> 01:02:01.600] the arguments against water fluoridation. [01:02:01.600 --> 01:02:04.400] Fluoride Free Houston member Derek Rose spoke about the group's mission. [01:02:04.400 --> 01:02:08.440] Fluoride Free Houston aims to bring an end to water fluoridation in the city by raising [01:02:08.440 --> 01:02:13.000] awareness of city council members and citizens on the fact that it is a financial waste, [01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:17.760] a health hazard, an environmental hazard, it's a violation of civil liberties, and it [01:02:17.760 --> 01:02:19.800] affects Houston's poorest communities. [01:02:19.800 --> 01:02:24.360] The group will attend the city council tomorrow and again on Tuesday, October 7th. [01:02:24.360 --> 01:02:29.160] Support for Liberty Beat comes from Cabo Bobs, southwestern sour burritos, now with two locations [01:02:29.160 --> 01:02:30.160] in Austin. [01:02:30.160 --> 01:02:33.800] 500 East Ben White Boulevard and 2828 Rio Grande Boulevard. [01:02:33.800 --> 01:02:36.320] Find them online, Cabobobs.com. [01:02:36.320 --> 01:02:38.080] And support comes from Sovereign Living. [01:02:38.080 --> 01:02:43.160] A podcast, blog, and reality show about what it takes to live a voluntary and natural life. [01:02:43.160 --> 01:02:47.120] Check out the blog at SovereignLiving.com and watch episode one of the soon to be released [01:02:47.120 --> 01:02:50.560] reality show at SovereignLiving.tv. [01:02:50.560 --> 01:02:54.720] This is the Liberty Beat for Monday, September 29th, 2014. [01:02:54.720 --> 01:02:59.300] Check out the website at TheLibertyBeat.com and like us on Facebook at Facebook.com The [01:02:59.300 --> 01:03:09.080] Liberty Beat. [01:03:29.300 --> 01:03:56.200] Alright folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984. [01:03:56.200 --> 01:04:01.920] Right now we're going to go to Dusty in Texas, Dusty, what can we do for you? [01:04:01.920 --> 01:04:10.240] Hi, I was just dealing with a situation with what seemed to be kind of a simple traffic [01:04:10.240 --> 01:04:11.240] ticket. [01:04:11.240 --> 01:04:23.720] And it's in a very, very small town and it was probably 10 to 15 miles over and so when [01:04:23.720 --> 01:04:34.280] I signed it, I signed it non-summit and I signed it by colon my name and then all rights [01:04:34.280 --> 01:04:35.280] reserved. [01:04:35.280 --> 01:04:41.160] I should have probably put under duress but I wasn't thinking clearly. [01:04:41.160 --> 01:04:46.760] But anyway, I told the guy when he asked me how fast I was going, I said what was reasonable [01:04:46.760 --> 01:04:52.040] and prudent and he didn't really click to that. [01:04:52.040 --> 01:05:02.960] But anyway, then when he went on interviewing me about the ticket and everything and I told [01:05:02.960 --> 01:05:08.880] him, I said I am not in commerce and I'm not for hire and he thought that was kind of hilarious. [01:05:08.880 --> 01:05:14.160] But anyway, all of that was on the record because they were taping it. [01:05:14.160 --> 01:05:24.280] And so anyway, I started filing in a bunch of your paperwork and filed different instruments [01:05:24.280 --> 01:05:33.240] into the court record and one of them was, you know, that I didn't want to plead, you [01:05:33.240 --> 01:05:36.880] know, that I declined to... [01:05:36.880 --> 01:05:39.080] Notice of declamation to plea. [01:05:39.080 --> 01:05:40.080] Right. [01:05:40.080 --> 01:05:46.720] And then I did an affidavit of not being in commerce and I did an affidavit, let's say, [01:05:46.720 --> 01:05:53.920] improper service, no complaint and a notice to require reading of all notices and a notice [01:05:53.920 --> 01:06:00.120] to produce exculpatory evidence and then a notice of objection and protest. [01:06:00.120 --> 01:06:08.640] They had not given me any charging instrument and I had gone to the court several times [01:06:08.640 --> 01:06:12.480] trying to get different things and they wouldn't provide anything. [01:06:12.480 --> 01:06:16.880] They just kept telling me, you know, that I'd have to show up on the day of the trial. [01:06:16.880 --> 01:06:18.960] Well, you know... [01:06:18.960 --> 01:06:23.200] They would not allow you to access the public record? [01:06:23.200 --> 01:06:24.200] They would not give it to me. [01:06:24.200 --> 01:06:28.120] They told me that I would have to file an open records request and that they had 10 [01:06:28.120 --> 01:06:30.240] days to get the information back to me. [01:06:30.240 --> 01:06:33.920] That's absolutely incorrect. [01:06:33.920 --> 01:06:39.520] Under 552 of the government code specifically states that judicial records that are not [01:06:39.520 --> 01:06:43.720] administrative records of the court, in other words, anything being adjudicated in the court [01:06:43.720 --> 01:06:50.320] itself is 100% open to the public every hour of every day that the court is open. [01:06:50.320 --> 01:06:54.840] If they refuse that, they are committing crimes under 552 of the government code, down in [01:06:54.840 --> 01:06:58.320] 552.323 in fact. [01:06:58.320 --> 01:07:01.900] File a complaint with the attorney general's office against each and every person there [01:07:01.900 --> 01:07:07.680] that told you no, including the judge, whether you ever spoke to them or not, because they [01:07:07.680 --> 01:07:13.920] are the head administrator and they are required to teach their people to do it correctly. [01:07:13.920 --> 01:07:17.600] Okay. [01:07:17.600 --> 01:07:24.000] It went from that to worse. [01:07:24.000 --> 01:07:33.280] We went in and all of my documents had it as being appearing by special appearance and [01:07:33.280 --> 01:07:38.640] that I was there just to challenge jurisdiction. [01:07:38.640 --> 01:07:45.920] I thought it was basically kind of a pretrial thing and that they would give me the information [01:07:45.920 --> 01:07:50.000] that I was looking for, but they never gave me any information at all. [01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:57.240] They would not give me, I asked several times for the oath of office and the bond. [01:07:57.240 --> 01:07:59.600] They would not give me that. [01:07:59.600 --> 01:08:02.080] They kept telling me that it would take them several days. [01:08:02.080 --> 01:08:10.360] I asked them for the articles of incorporation so that I could see how the structure was [01:08:10.360 --> 01:08:16.760] set up since it is a small town as to whether or not they even had authority to have a police [01:08:16.760 --> 01:08:17.760] force. [01:08:17.760 --> 01:08:23.080] Well, yeah, that would only appear in a charter of a home rule city. [01:08:23.080 --> 01:08:26.760] If it's that small a town, I doubt very seriously it's a home rule city. [01:08:26.760 --> 01:08:28.560] No, it isn't. [01:08:28.560 --> 01:08:30.560] I found that out. [01:08:30.560 --> 01:08:40.720] So anyway, we get there and he called me one of the first ones and I went up there and [01:08:40.720 --> 01:08:49.200] told him I was there by special appointment only to challenge jurisdiction on the matter [01:08:49.200 --> 01:08:52.520] and that I had a lot of different documents in the case. [01:08:52.520 --> 01:08:55.880] He said, this is just a stupid traffic ticket, it's a misdemeanor. [01:08:55.880 --> 01:08:58.840] Why are you filing all this stuff into the record? [01:08:58.840 --> 01:09:01.040] I said, because. [01:09:01.040 --> 01:09:04.800] Because I have a right to defend myself against a criminal accusation. [01:09:04.800 --> 01:09:06.360] How hard is that to understand? [01:09:06.360 --> 01:09:09.200] Why are you sitting on a bench asking a stupid question? [01:09:09.200 --> 01:09:11.720] See how that works. [01:09:11.720 --> 01:09:12.720] Yeah. [01:09:12.720 --> 01:09:23.320] So anyway, it kind of shook him up that I had all this paperwork and there was a contract [01:09:23.320 --> 01:09:29.200] prosecutor, but the person did not do or say hardly anything. [01:09:29.200 --> 01:09:35.400] I think in the entire seven hours that we were there, she asked three different people [01:09:35.400 --> 01:09:37.520] maybe three questions. [01:09:37.520 --> 01:09:45.800] The rest of it was the judge who is not an attorney, but he's the administrative judge. [01:09:45.800 --> 01:09:53.200] He was doing all of the prosecuting as well as all of the judging, as well as sentencing. [01:09:53.200 --> 01:09:56.600] Well if they were doing bench trials, that would be how it works. [01:09:56.600 --> 01:10:00.480] If they're doing jury trials, that better not be how it worked. [01:10:00.480 --> 01:10:05.440] Well, he was doing the preliminary as well as bench trials. [01:10:05.440 --> 01:10:13.800] He was doing the preliminary and the bench, and it was just really kind of crazy. [01:10:13.800 --> 01:10:14.800] Okay. [01:10:14.800 --> 01:10:19.560] When you say he's doing the preliminary, was the prosecutor even in the room? [01:10:19.560 --> 01:10:22.080] Oh yeah. [01:10:22.080 --> 01:10:25.080] But the prosecutor never opened their mouth? [01:10:25.080 --> 01:10:26.080] No. [01:10:26.080 --> 01:10:27.080] No. [01:10:27.080 --> 01:10:37.800] So we have a non-attorney judge that was doing basically everything, he was a one-man band. [01:10:37.800 --> 01:10:39.800] Okay. [01:10:39.800 --> 01:10:46.040] Well, if it's not a court of record, it doesn't matter that they're not an attorney. [01:10:46.040 --> 01:10:51.080] But it does matter that they're doing everything without any input or effort on the part of [01:10:51.080 --> 01:10:52.080] the prosecution. [01:10:52.080 --> 01:11:00.440] File a motion to recuse or disqualify this judge ASAP and cite the fact that the judge [01:11:00.440 --> 01:11:07.080] is acting entirely on behalf of the prosecution in this court to ensure a conviction against [01:11:07.080 --> 01:11:08.160] the accused. [01:11:08.160 --> 01:11:14.560] The prosecutor appears but never does anything, never speaks, never addresses the court. [01:11:14.560 --> 01:11:17.480] The judge does it all on his behalf. [01:11:17.480 --> 01:11:20.360] That's biased. [01:11:20.360 --> 01:11:25.840] We believe you cannot get a fair and impartial trial in this court. [01:11:25.840 --> 01:11:32.800] There is one of those in the material for recusal and disqualification. [01:11:32.800 --> 01:11:36.960] Okay. [01:11:36.960 --> 01:11:37.960] So from that point... [01:11:37.960 --> 01:11:41.400] Now, is this municipal or JP? [01:11:41.400 --> 01:11:42.400] Municipal. [01:11:42.400 --> 01:11:43.400] Yeah. [01:11:43.400 --> 01:11:45.400] Most assuredly, file it. [01:11:45.400 --> 01:11:56.840] So then it went from there to where he made me wait till the last person on the docket [01:11:56.840 --> 01:11:57.840] to call again. [01:11:57.840 --> 01:12:01.040] So basically wasted my entire day. [01:12:01.040 --> 01:12:05.720] And so when I got up there the second time, he demanded that I plea. [01:12:05.720 --> 01:12:12.040] And again, I told him that I was here by special appearance to challenge jurisdiction and that [01:12:12.040 --> 01:12:18.520] I was not here to plea and that I had already filed a motion in the court for declining [01:12:18.520 --> 01:12:21.600] to plea with the prisons and everything. [01:12:21.600 --> 01:12:27.640] And so he insisted that I plea and I kept saying no. [01:12:27.640 --> 01:12:34.240] And so basically he said, well, I will enter a plea for you. [01:12:34.240 --> 01:12:40.240] And I said, you know, I don't want you to enter a plea for me, you know, and he says, [01:12:40.240 --> 01:12:41.240] well, I am entering. [01:12:41.240 --> 01:12:42.240] Yeah. [01:12:42.240 --> 01:12:47.080] The statute says he can, but the problem is he has to have jurisdiction before he does [01:12:47.080 --> 01:12:48.080] that. [01:12:48.080 --> 01:12:50.200] Here's a couple of questions I got for you. [01:12:50.200 --> 01:12:53.120] Did they ever serve you with a copy of the complaint? [01:12:53.120 --> 01:12:54.120] No. [01:12:54.120 --> 01:12:55.120] Okay. [01:12:55.120 --> 01:12:57.960] So have you ever seen the complaint? [01:12:57.960 --> 01:12:58.960] No. [01:12:58.960 --> 01:12:59.960] No. [01:12:59.960 --> 01:13:08.280] So everything they've done is 100% absent any and all jurisdiction? [01:13:08.280 --> 01:13:12.800] When I asked him for the, well, I went, I actually made a special trip over there one [01:13:12.800 --> 01:13:19.600] day and asked him for a copy of the charging instrument and the complaint with the information. [01:13:19.600 --> 01:13:22.360] And they said they didn't have anything but the ticket. [01:13:22.360 --> 01:13:26.480] And I said, well, you're supposed to have this at least a day ahead, you know. [01:13:26.480 --> 01:13:29.360] And they said, well, the only thing we have is the ticket. [01:13:29.360 --> 01:13:30.360] So I said, okay. [01:13:30.360 --> 01:13:34.880] And she said, well, you know, you'll have to come back, you know, on the day of court. [01:13:34.880 --> 01:13:40.960] So when I went up there, I said, look, you know, I have never even received a copy of [01:13:40.960 --> 01:13:42.160] the charging instrument. [01:13:42.160 --> 01:13:44.920] I have no complaint. [01:13:44.920 --> 01:13:46.120] I have no information. [01:13:46.120 --> 01:13:47.720] I have nothing. [01:13:47.720 --> 01:13:49.920] And he says, all you need is this. [01:13:49.920 --> 01:13:52.120] And he starts screaming at me. [01:13:52.120 --> 01:13:58.320] And you know, he's swinging the ticket at me, you know. [01:13:58.320 --> 01:14:06.280] Well, see, I had done a notice of mistake and sent the ticket back with my affidavit [01:14:06.280 --> 01:14:14.880] of notice to obey to show cause because I said, you know, there is no jurisdiction here. [01:14:14.880 --> 01:14:18.360] And I stated my reasons in this affidavit. [01:14:18.360 --> 01:14:29.400] And I actually asked them to rebut or refute everything with, you know, evidence and sworn [01:14:29.400 --> 01:14:32.560] under oath and affirmation that, you know. [01:14:32.560 --> 01:14:34.680] Well, that's not going to happen. [01:14:34.680 --> 01:14:36.160] You can file that all you want. [01:14:36.160 --> 01:14:38.160] That's not going to happen. [01:14:38.160 --> 01:14:39.160] True. [01:14:39.160 --> 01:14:42.200] But most complaints are supposed to be sworn with, you know. [01:14:42.200 --> 01:14:43.200] Well, they are. [01:14:43.200 --> 01:14:46.560] But the problem is that the clerks of the courts are doing both parts. [01:14:46.560 --> 01:14:50.000] They're doing the swearing and they're doing the verifying, which means they're acting [01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:56.080] as the judge because they're the judge's agent, which again, deprives the judge of jurisdiction [01:14:56.080 --> 01:15:00.920] because he cannot sit in a case where he is the accuser. [01:15:00.920 --> 01:15:05.040] And by a court clerk being the accuser, that's exactly what's happening. [01:15:05.040 --> 01:15:12.040] Hence, the reason why the special appearance in motion to dismiss says what it says. [01:15:12.040 --> 01:15:13.040] Right. [01:15:13.040 --> 01:15:14.040] Okay. [01:15:14.040 --> 01:15:20.000] So right now, your biggest issue here, first and foremost, file the motion to recuse and [01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:25.520] disqualify and make darn sure that in there, you make sure that if it's not already there, [01:15:25.520 --> 01:15:32.260] you add it, that the judge acted entirely on behalf of the prosecution throughout any [01:15:32.260 --> 01:15:33.920] and all proceedings. [01:15:33.920 --> 01:15:39.680] The judge has acted without any signed and sworn complaint or information as required [01:15:39.680 --> 01:15:46.540] by 2.04 and 05 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:15:46.540 --> 01:15:51.400] And the court has acted with the knowing intention of depriving you of your right of due process [01:15:51.400 --> 01:15:58.840] based upon lack of notice, just like it is in the motion to dismiss and special appearance. [01:15:58.840 --> 01:15:59.840] Okay. [01:15:59.840 --> 01:16:05.560] Now, the most of that should be in there, but whatever parts of it are not, add them [01:16:05.560 --> 01:16:08.440] and get it filed ASAP. [01:16:08.440 --> 01:16:14.800] Now according to Chapter 29A of the Government Code, the moment this is filed, that municipal [01:16:14.800 --> 01:16:21.360] court must cease any and all actions until a hearing on this motion has been had. [01:16:21.360 --> 01:16:22.760] They cannot deny it. [01:16:22.760 --> 01:16:24.100] They cannot rule on it. [01:16:24.100 --> 01:16:27.840] They can only forward it to the head administrative judge of the district. [01:16:27.840 --> 01:16:33.720] And depending upon where you are, if you're in this area, that'll be Billy Ray Stubblefield. [01:16:33.720 --> 01:16:36.560] If you're in somewhere else, I don't know who it might be. [01:16:36.560 --> 01:16:40.840] But hang on just a second, Dusty, and we'll pick this up on the other side of the break, [01:16:40.840 --> 01:16:41.840] okay? [01:16:41.840 --> 01:16:42.840] Thank you. [01:16:42.840 --> 01:16:43.840] You're welcome. [01:16:43.840 --> 01:16:48.760] All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio 512-646-1984. [01:16:48.760 --> 01:16:50.640] I've got Josh, Armando, and Mike. [01:16:50.640 --> 01:16:54.640] You guys hang in there, and I will try to get done with everybody before we end this [01:16:54.640 --> 01:16:55.640] show tonight. [01:16:55.640 --> 01:17:01.360] So we'll be right back. [01:17:01.360 --> 01:17:04.880] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination [01:17:04.880 --> 01:17:08.960] by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. [01:17:08.960 --> 01:17:13.200] We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality [01:17:13.200 --> 01:17:14.800] coins and precious metals. [01:17:14.800 --> 01:17:18.720] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. [01:17:18.720 --> 01:17:23.400] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers [01:17:23.400 --> 01:17:24.400] and journalists. [01:17:24.400 --> 01:17:27.360] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. [01:17:27.360 --> 01:17:31.640] In addition, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and [01:17:31.640 --> 01:17:32.640] Polynburst. [01:17:32.640 --> 01:17:37.480] We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition [01:17:37.480 --> 01:17:39.640] at 10% above wholesale, and more. [01:17:39.640 --> 01:17:43.560] We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept Bitcoins as payment. [01:17:43.560 --> 01:17:46.560] Call us at 512-646-6440. [01:17:46.560 --> 01:17:51.560] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. [01:17:51.560 --> 01:17:54.560] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. [01:17:54.560 --> 01:18:01.360] Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440. [01:18:01.360 --> 01:18:04.640] Chances are you've heard of My Magic Mud, but have you used it? [01:18:04.640 --> 01:18:08.480] Thousands of people are blown away by the clean and healthy feeling they experience [01:18:08.480 --> 01:18:10.040] after just one use. [01:18:10.040 --> 01:18:13.960] Here's what Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, has to say about the product. [01:18:13.960 --> 01:18:16.440] Hey everybody, this is Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books. [01:18:16.440 --> 01:18:18.840] Just want to tell everybody about My Magic Mud. [01:18:18.840 --> 01:18:22.240] I use the product and it makes my teeth feel clean and healthy. [01:18:22.240 --> 01:18:23.240] I think it makes them stronger. [01:18:23.240 --> 01:18:26.240] And I got lots of customers that come in and say the same thing. [01:18:26.240 --> 01:18:27.920] You can pick yours up at Brave New Books. [01:18:27.920 --> 01:18:32.320] If that wasn't enough, Dr. Griffin Cole, DDS, who's been featured on the Alex Jones [01:18:32.320 --> 01:18:33.520] show, loves it too. [01:18:33.520 --> 01:18:35.240] Hi, I'm Dr. Griffin Cole. [01:18:35.240 --> 01:18:37.960] And I got to tell you, I really love this Magic Mud product. [01:18:37.960 --> 01:18:42.040] Because charcoal is so absorbent, it's very effective at taking off all the sticky plaque [01:18:42.040 --> 01:18:43.880] and debris that gets stuck on our teeth every day. [01:18:43.880 --> 01:18:45.360] I highly recommend My Magic Mud. [01:18:45.360 --> 01:18:49.880] If you haven't yet experienced My Magic Mud, it's never too late to brighten your smile [01:18:49.880 --> 01:18:51.320] and strengthen your teeth. [01:18:51.320 --> 01:18:56.760] Get your jar of My Magic Mud today at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street [01:18:56.760 --> 01:18:59.760] or order online today at MyMagicMud.com. [01:19:26.760 --> 01:19:40.960] All right, folks, we are back. [01:19:40.960 --> 01:19:46.840] This is Rule of Law Radio and we are talking to Dusty in Texas about the Just Us system [01:19:46.840 --> 01:19:50.160] that she has found herself entangled with. [01:19:50.160 --> 01:19:52.520] All right, Dusty. [01:19:52.520 --> 01:20:00.640] All right, well, basically, after he entered the plea, they went ahead and watched the [01:20:00.640 --> 01:20:04.640] video of me being pulled over and all that kind of stuff. [01:20:04.640 --> 01:20:05.640] And... [01:20:05.640 --> 01:20:08.240] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, wait. [01:20:08.240 --> 01:20:13.620] They entered a plea and then they watch, who is they? [01:20:13.620 --> 01:20:21.120] The judge had the, the policeman already, I mean, he ramrodded this thing all the way [01:20:21.120 --> 01:20:27.320] through where it was actually a bench trial and I never had a pretrial. [01:20:27.320 --> 01:20:33.600] And I wasn't even, I asked him, you know, just to rule on the motions that were already [01:20:33.600 --> 01:20:34.600] filed into the court. [01:20:34.600 --> 01:20:37.120] Did you ever agree to a bench trial? [01:20:37.120 --> 01:20:38.120] No. [01:20:38.120 --> 01:20:39.120] Oh, goody. [01:20:39.120 --> 01:20:40.120] Oh, goody. [01:20:40.120 --> 01:20:50.520] Along with this motion to dismiss and, or I'm sorry, the motion to recuse and disqualify, [01:20:50.520 --> 01:20:57.240] file a judicial conduct complaint against this moron and criminal charges for official [01:20:57.240 --> 01:21:01.400] oppression and abuse of official capacity because he denied you and your right to a [01:21:01.400 --> 01:21:04.120] jury trial in a criminal case. [01:21:04.120 --> 01:21:06.600] Right. [01:21:06.600 --> 01:21:11.400] You've got criminal charges against this guy and you've got a major lawsuit. [01:21:11.400 --> 01:21:14.960] Well, it gets worse. [01:21:14.960 --> 01:21:16.760] Oh, no. [01:21:16.760 --> 01:21:19.440] All it can do now is get better. [01:21:19.440 --> 01:21:24.680] Well, depends on who's doing the time. [01:21:24.680 --> 01:21:29.720] Anyway, by the time that he got done, you know, showing the video and all that kind [01:21:29.720 --> 01:21:38.760] of stuff, he, he told me that I could only ask three yes or no questions of the officer. [01:21:38.760 --> 01:21:42.440] Well, that's not my right to a- [01:21:42.440 --> 01:21:44.480] Oh, he can't do that. [01:21:44.480 --> 01:21:49.160] Please God tell me you had witnesses in the courtroom or somebody recording this. [01:21:49.160 --> 01:21:50.720] Yes, I did. [01:21:50.720 --> 01:21:52.960] I had a court watcher with me. [01:21:52.960 --> 01:21:53.960] Just one? [01:21:53.960 --> 01:21:54.960] Taking notes. [01:21:54.960 --> 01:21:55.960] Well, I only had one. [01:21:55.960 --> 01:21:56.960] I'm sorry. [01:21:56.960 --> 01:21:57.960] But- [01:21:57.960 --> 01:21:59.960] They're not a convicted felon, are they? [01:21:59.960 --> 01:22:00.960] No. [01:22:00.960 --> 01:22:01.960] Okay, good. [01:22:01.960 --> 01:22:05.640] Then they can make an affidavit and it'll hold up. [01:22:05.640 --> 01:22:11.520] So anyway, at that point- [01:22:11.520 --> 01:22:16.160] Now don't forget, you can make the officer and the affidavit or the officer and the prosecutor [01:22:16.160 --> 01:22:17.560] both swear out affidavits. [01:22:17.560 --> 01:22:20.200] That's what the instructions the judge gave you as well. [01:22:20.200 --> 01:22:25.120] And if they lie, oh, now it gets really good. [01:22:25.120 --> 01:22:27.120] Okay. [01:22:27.120 --> 01:22:30.240] How long ago was this? [01:22:30.240 --> 01:22:31.560] Just this last week. [01:22:31.560 --> 01:22:32.560] Okay. [01:22:32.560 --> 01:22:37.240] You only have 10 days to file a motion for new or five days to file a motion for new [01:22:37.240 --> 01:22:38.800] trial. [01:22:38.800 --> 01:22:45.380] You've got to do that ASAP and you've only got 10 days to get your bond in place. [01:22:45.380 --> 01:22:49.880] So get yourself their surety bond paperwork, get it filed out and get it filed. [01:22:49.880 --> 01:22:54.800] Get your motion for new trial filed immediately. [01:22:54.800 --> 01:23:00.200] In your motion for new trial, you put down every single thing this judge has done wrong, [01:23:00.200 --> 01:23:06.960] every law he's violated and these last instructions and denial of a jury trial into that motion [01:23:06.960 --> 01:23:09.000] for new trial. [01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:10.480] Okay. [01:23:10.480 --> 01:23:18.120] So then after he told me, you know, that I could only ask three yes or no questions, [01:23:18.120 --> 01:23:22.400] which that's not going to, you know, relieve me of anything. [01:23:22.400 --> 01:23:29.080] He already had me, you know, basically hung by the time that I even walked up there. [01:23:29.080 --> 01:23:33.600] Did the prosecutor say anything to this? [01:23:33.600 --> 01:23:37.040] I don't believe so. [01:23:37.040 --> 01:23:39.760] He did instruct me before. [01:23:39.760 --> 01:23:43.440] He never instructed anyone else, but I had left to go to the restroom. [01:23:43.440 --> 01:23:49.680] And when I came back as I was coming in before I was even called up there, he stopped everything [01:23:49.680 --> 01:23:56.600] and said, you know, you are not allowed to have your cell phone on. [01:23:56.600 --> 01:23:59.720] You are not allowed to have any recording devices. [01:23:59.720 --> 01:24:01.600] You are not allowed to record anything. [01:24:01.600 --> 01:24:06.480] And if anybody suspects that you do, you will be in contempt of court. [01:24:06.480 --> 01:24:08.560] So he did not want... [01:24:08.560 --> 01:24:10.560] Oh, absolutely not. [01:24:10.560 --> 01:24:12.920] That's exactly what he didn't want. [01:24:12.920 --> 01:24:16.720] But I hope you ignored him and did it anyway. [01:24:16.720 --> 01:24:18.080] Actually I didn't. [01:24:18.080 --> 01:24:24.360] But, you know, like I said, we had some witnesses. [01:24:24.360 --> 01:24:31.040] And I think I can subpoena the docket and track down everybody, you know, that participated [01:24:31.040 --> 01:24:32.040] in this. [01:24:32.040 --> 01:24:39.000] But anyway, so when he got all done, he said, well, you know, I'm finding you guilty. [01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:43.560] And I said, well, the only thing I can say is, you know, I want to appeal this. [01:24:43.560 --> 01:24:46.200] And he says, well, I need you to sign this. [01:24:46.200 --> 01:24:50.200] And I said, if it's, you know, to appeal it, then I'll sign it. [01:24:50.200 --> 01:24:51.720] But he hands me this piece of paper. [01:24:51.720 --> 01:24:53.800] Well, he wanted me to plea one way or another. [01:24:53.800 --> 01:24:56.400] And I said, no, I'm not going to do it. [01:24:56.400 --> 01:25:01.000] And he said, I told you, you know, I'm not here to plea. [01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:04.560] And he said, but you just said that you were going to sign it. [01:25:04.560 --> 01:25:09.760] And I said, no, I said I wanted to appeal your decision. [01:25:09.760 --> 01:25:14.960] And he said, well, you know, you said that you were going to sign it. [01:25:14.960 --> 01:25:18.440] And I said, you have not given me any charging instrument. [01:25:18.440 --> 01:25:22.240] You have not given me any complaint, any information. [01:25:22.240 --> 01:25:25.120] And you've died me and my right to a jury trial. [01:25:25.120 --> 01:25:26.120] Right. [01:25:26.120 --> 01:25:38.240] So then he, let's say, oh, I also told him, I said, you have not even told me what law [01:25:38.240 --> 01:25:41.160] I allegedly broke. [01:25:41.160 --> 01:25:45.080] And he says, I told you, you were charged with speeding. [01:25:45.080 --> 01:25:53.440] And I said, but you never identified the specific law that I am accused of breaking. [01:25:53.440 --> 01:25:56.240] And he says, you need to stop that right now. [01:25:56.240 --> 01:26:00.320] You know, he says, you know, just don't ever, don't say anymore. [01:26:00.320 --> 01:26:06.960] And I said, you know, you never told me what I did that broke the law. [01:26:06.960 --> 01:26:08.360] You've never told me what law I broke. [01:26:08.360 --> 01:26:10.560] He says, you are in contempt. [01:26:10.560 --> 01:26:16.800] And he had the two policemen on either side come and handcuff me. [01:26:16.800 --> 01:26:18.840] And I told them, I said, don't touch me. [01:26:18.840 --> 01:26:20.360] I don't consent. [01:26:20.360 --> 01:26:25.880] And they said, you either put your hands behind your back or I'm going to tase you. [01:26:25.880 --> 01:26:30.080] And so I did put my hands behind my back and they rushed me out of the courtroom. [01:26:30.080 --> 01:26:35.880] Fortunately, my court washer had my wallet and my phone and keys and all that because [01:26:35.880 --> 01:26:38.840] otherwise they would have been able to search those too. [01:26:38.840 --> 01:26:49.720] But anyway, I ended up making a 40 minute trip on my back with my hands behind my back [01:26:49.720 --> 01:26:56.920] in the back of an SUV all the way up there to the court jail. [01:26:56.920 --> 01:27:03.040] And they booked me, hand print, you know, fingerprinted me the whole thing and mugshot [01:27:03.040 --> 01:27:04.400] and all. [01:27:04.400 --> 01:27:09.120] And they told me that I was going to be there for three days, but I'd already been there [01:27:09.120 --> 01:27:10.960] really tied up all day long. [01:27:10.960 --> 01:27:11.960] You know what I mean? [01:27:11.960 --> 01:27:12.960] Yeah. [01:27:12.960 --> 01:27:14.480] Well, see, here's the only problem, Dusty. [01:27:14.480 --> 01:27:19.160] They cannot throw you in jail for contempt without a hearing. [01:27:19.160 --> 01:27:23.680] This judge has gone so far over the rails, it's not even funny. [01:27:23.680 --> 01:27:27.480] So I've only got a couple of minutes left in this segment before I go to break and I [01:27:27.480 --> 01:27:28.480] got three other callers. [01:27:28.480 --> 01:27:29.480] So here's what I would love to do. [01:27:29.480 --> 01:27:33.560] I would love to have this story finished on the air, but I'm not sure I'm going to get [01:27:33.560 --> 01:27:36.200] that done tonight if I'm going to help anybody else. [01:27:36.200 --> 01:27:43.840] So I'm going to ask you if you would please send me an email with all of the specific [01:27:43.840 --> 01:27:49.740] information, the correct information about the judge, the court, all of this. [01:27:49.740 --> 01:27:56.040] I will be more than delighted to make the rest of this judge's existence a nightmare [01:27:56.040 --> 01:27:57.040] in hell. [01:27:57.040 --> 01:27:58.040] I would too. [01:27:58.040 --> 01:28:02.960] I ended up spending four days instead of three. [01:28:02.960 --> 01:28:04.600] I just got out. [01:28:04.600 --> 01:28:05.600] Okay. [01:28:05.600 --> 01:28:12.960] And then get your, get that motion for new trial filed immediately, immediately. [01:28:12.960 --> 01:28:16.280] Get all of this stuff in it and get it filed. [01:28:16.280 --> 01:28:20.960] I guarantee you that's exactly what this judge was trying to do was to prevent you from getting [01:28:20.960 --> 01:28:23.000] your appeal. [01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:25.760] That's exactly what he's doing. [01:28:25.760 --> 01:28:27.200] Okay. [01:28:27.200 --> 01:28:29.360] Sounds good. [01:28:29.360 --> 01:28:30.360] All right. [01:28:30.360 --> 01:28:32.480] Now remember that's calendar days. [01:28:32.480 --> 01:28:37.880] As long as the first day didn't start on a weekend or a holiday, the clock is ticking. [01:28:37.880 --> 01:28:39.240] Okay. [01:28:39.240 --> 01:28:41.920] All right. [01:28:41.920 --> 01:28:43.400] So please send that to me. [01:28:43.400 --> 01:28:47.880] It's Eddie, E-D-D-I-E at ruleoflawradio.com. [01:28:47.880 --> 01:28:49.200] Give me all the details. [01:28:49.200 --> 01:28:56.080] Give me any paperwork you do have from them and anything that you have put in. [01:28:56.080 --> 01:28:59.440] And I will see what I can do. [01:28:59.440 --> 01:29:04.800] But I need to know who and where this judge is because he is about to get a hail storm [01:29:04.800 --> 01:29:05.800] on his head. [01:29:05.800 --> 01:29:06.800] All righty. [01:29:06.800 --> 01:29:07.800] Sounds good. [01:29:07.800 --> 01:29:08.800] Okay. [01:29:08.800 --> 01:29:16.120] And after I consult with you with it, I will be very happy to make his name and position [01:29:16.120 --> 01:29:18.920] public without associating you with it. [01:29:18.920 --> 01:29:23.320] But I will associate the case and get as many people filing criminal complaints on this [01:29:23.320 --> 01:29:26.520] guy as possible. [01:29:26.520 --> 01:29:27.520] Thank you. [01:29:27.520 --> 01:29:28.520] He needs to. [01:29:28.520 --> 01:29:34.680] Oh, this is exactly the kind of thing I live for when it comes to these guys in these courts. [01:29:34.680 --> 01:29:39.080] This is exactly what we want them doing because this is how we bury them. [01:29:39.080 --> 01:29:40.080] Okay. [01:29:40.080 --> 01:29:43.360] All right, Dusty, thanks for calling in. [01:29:43.360 --> 01:29:47.400] Get that done, please, because without it, you are stuck. [01:29:47.400 --> 01:29:48.880] All righty. [01:29:48.880 --> 01:29:49.880] Okay. [01:29:49.880 --> 01:29:50.880] Thank you. [01:29:50.880 --> 01:29:51.880] You're welcome. [01:29:51.880 --> 01:29:52.880] All right, folks. [01:29:52.880 --> 01:29:53.880] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:29:53.880 --> 01:29:57.880] Josh, Armando, Mike, y'all hold on and I'll pick y'all up when we get back. [01:29:57.880 --> 01:30:06.880] A decade ago, automobile crashes were the leading cause of death by injury in America. [01:30:06.880 --> 01:30:12.040] But in recent years, car accidents have been surpassed by a much more disturbing cause [01:30:12.040 --> 01:30:13.040] of death. [01:30:13.040 --> 01:30:17.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you what it is in a moment. [01:30:17.400 --> 01:30:19.120] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:19.120 --> 01:30:22.720] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:22.720 --> 01:30:27.720] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:27.720 --> 01:30:32.960] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.960 --> 01:30:35.520] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:35.520 --> 01:30:41.120] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, [01:30:41.120 --> 01:30:42.840] Yahoo and Bing. [01:30:42.840 --> 01:30:44.680] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:44.680 --> 01:30:49.880] Here's some bad news we haven't seen since the Great Recession. [01:30:49.880 --> 01:30:54.280] Today, suicide takes more American lives than any other injury. [01:30:54.280 --> 01:30:58.040] Car accidents were the leading cause of death until 2009. [01:30:58.040 --> 01:31:03.040] That year, nearly 40,000 Americans committed suicide, making it the leading cause of injury [01:31:03.040 --> 01:31:04.640] related death. [01:31:04.640 --> 01:31:10.640] While suicides increased 15% that decade, deaths from poisoning more than doubled. [01:31:10.640 --> 01:31:14.840] Researchers believe many of those prescription drug overdoses may be intentional, which would [01:31:14.840 --> 01:31:17.760] raise the suicide rate even higher. [01:31:17.760 --> 01:31:20.200] If you're feeling down, reach out for help. [01:31:20.200 --> 01:31:23.120] There are more resources available today than ever before. [01:31:23.120 --> 01:31:31.520] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.520 --> 01:31:36.880] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [01:31:36.880 --> 01:31:39.320] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:39.320 --> 01:31:43.960] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.960 --> 01:31:46.680] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.680 --> 01:31:49.360] Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:49.360 --> 01:31:50.760] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.760 --> 01:31:51.760] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.760 --> 01:31:53.280] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:53.280 --> 01:31:54.280] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.280 --> 01:31:55.880] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.880 --> 01:31:58.520] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.520 --> 01:32:02.120] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:02.120 --> 01:32:05.840] After work, I'm so tired that I want to be left alone to sleep. [01:32:05.840 --> 01:32:07.400] Hey, listen to me. [01:32:07.400 --> 01:32:08.400] Who are you? [01:32:08.400 --> 01:32:12.360] I'm you years ago, when you felt healthy and young and everything worked on your body. [01:32:12.360 --> 01:32:13.600] Do you remember that? [01:32:13.600 --> 01:32:14.600] Yes. [01:32:14.600 --> 01:32:15.820] I wish I felt like that now. [01:32:15.820 --> 01:32:20.960] You can feel like that again with a new micro-plant powder formulation called iDyNow. [01:32:20.960 --> 01:32:25.560] It cleans the entire body from head to toe and feeds the body what it really needs. [01:32:25.560 --> 01:32:28.960] You'll be in a better mood, and you'll find more drive in your romantic life. [01:32:28.960 --> 01:32:29.960] Really? [01:32:29.960 --> 01:32:31.320] I got to try iodine now. [01:32:31.320 --> 01:32:32.440] It feel good again. [01:32:32.440 --> 01:32:36.920] It also protects you from radiation, heavy metals, fluoride, chlorine, and bromine, including [01:32:36.920 --> 01:32:38.920] cancer and most major diseases. [01:32:38.920 --> 01:32:39.920] You'll be amazed. [01:32:39.920 --> 01:32:41.200] You can be your own doctor. [01:32:41.200 --> 01:32:44.160] I want to keep you out of the hospital and off pharmaceuticals. [01:32:44.160 --> 01:32:45.160] Wow. [01:32:45.160 --> 01:32:47.040] Why are you so nice to me? [01:32:47.040 --> 01:32:48.040] Because I'm you. [01:32:48.040 --> 01:32:50.520] You're out of shape, and I need a better-looking future. [01:32:50.520 --> 01:32:51.520] Call 888-910-4367. [01:32:51.520 --> 01:32:52.520] That's 888-910-4367. [01:32:52.520 --> 01:32:53.520] Or visit microplantpowder.com. [01:32:53.520 --> 01:32:54.520] microplantpowder.com. [01:32:54.520 --> 01:32:55.520] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:32:55.520 --> 01:32:56.520] Yeah, who you want the chicken? [01:32:56.520 --> 01:32:57.520] Do you think it's for free, dolly? [01:32:57.520 --> 01:32:58.520] I want chicken. [01:32:58.520 --> 01:32:59.520] I'm not free, dolly. [01:32:59.520 --> 01:33:00.520] You can't chicken me. [01:33:00.520 --> 01:33:01.520] I'm not free, dolly. [01:33:01.520 --> 01:33:02.520] I'm not free, dolly. [01:33:02.520 --> 01:33:03.520] I'm not free, dolly. [01:33:03.520 --> 01:33:04.520] I'm not free, dolly. [01:33:04.520 --> 01:33:05.520] I'm not free, dolly. [01:33:05.520 --> 01:33:06.520] I'm not free, dolly. [01:33:06.520 --> 01:33:07.520] I'm not free, dolly. [01:33:07.520 --> 01:33:26.520] I'm not free, dolly. [01:33:26.520 --> 01:33:41.520] I'm not free, dolly. [01:33:41.520 --> 01:33:42.520] All right, folks. [01:33:42.520 --> 01:33:43.520] We are back. [01:33:43.520 --> 01:33:46.520] This is Rule of Law Radio, and we are going to go back now with Josh in Pennsylvania. [01:33:46.520 --> 01:33:47.520] Oh, hang on. [01:33:47.520 --> 01:33:48.520] Let me finish. [01:33:48.520 --> 01:33:50.520] Josh, before I get to you, let me finish up with Dusty. [01:33:50.520 --> 01:33:53.520] Dusty, you got my email address, right? [01:33:53.520 --> 01:33:57.520] Yes, I do. [01:33:57.520 --> 01:33:58.520] Okay. [01:33:58.520 --> 01:34:05.520] Please give me all that information, and let's talk offline on this, and then after we get some things in the works with your permission, [01:34:05.520 --> 01:34:10.520] we will bring it back on the air and let people know what we're doing and why. [01:34:10.520 --> 01:34:11.520] All righty. [01:34:11.520 --> 01:34:12.520] Sounds good. [01:34:12.520 --> 01:34:13.520] Okay. [01:34:13.520 --> 01:34:14.520] All right. [01:34:14.520 --> 01:34:15.520] Thanks for calling in. [01:34:15.520 --> 01:34:16.520] Uh-huh. [01:34:16.520 --> 01:34:17.520] Bye-bye. [01:34:17.520 --> 01:34:18.520] All right. [01:34:18.520 --> 01:34:20.520] Now we're going to go to Josh in Pennsylvania. [01:34:20.520 --> 01:34:23.520] Josh, what you got? [01:34:23.520 --> 01:34:24.520] Hey, Eddie. [01:34:24.520 --> 01:34:30.520] I want to thank you for all you're doing and representing in the cause of liberty in this land. [01:34:30.520 --> 01:34:36.520] Well, mostly it's crying and shaking my head, but thank you. [01:34:36.520 --> 01:34:41.520] Also want to encourage Dusty to keep up the fight. [01:34:41.520 --> 01:34:54.520] She's up against a big battle, and it's people like her that are going to stand strong against the tyranny in this land that will ultimately make a difference. [01:34:54.520 --> 01:35:00.520] But I'm in the process of filing motions into the record. [01:35:00.520 --> 01:35:02.520] I just had a quick question for you. [01:35:02.520 --> 01:35:14.520] How important is it to get supporting documents such as case law to support the motions whenever we enter these motions into the record? [01:35:14.520 --> 01:35:22.520] It is very important because case law is the only thing they respect if and when they bother to respect anything. [01:35:22.520 --> 01:35:28.520] They will always try to say that's your interpretation, whether it's the statute or whether it's the case law. [01:35:28.520 --> 01:35:34.520] But as long as you use the case law correctly, the appeals court is going to see your side of it, [01:35:34.520 --> 01:35:40.520] and they're going to come down hard on the decision and give you a way to go back after the trial court. [01:35:40.520 --> 01:35:51.520] Because when the trial court ignores precedent in favor of its own thing in violation of your rights, they have shot themselves in the temple. [01:35:51.520 --> 01:35:58.520] And I have no problem in digging the bullet out with a shovel. [01:35:58.520 --> 01:36:00.520] I got you. [01:36:00.520 --> 01:36:07.520] What's the easiest way to look into case law to find supporting documents? [01:36:07.520 --> 01:36:09.520] What I go to? [01:36:09.520 --> 01:36:13.520] The easiest way is to access Lexis at a state law library computer, [01:36:13.520 --> 01:36:19.520] so you don't have to go to an attorney's office or some other place where it would cost you a lot of money to do it. [01:36:19.520 --> 01:36:25.520] The law library is the best spot unless you've got a student Lexis account. [01:36:25.520 --> 01:36:27.520] Okay. [01:36:27.520 --> 01:36:28.520] Very good. [01:36:28.520 --> 01:36:29.520] Thanks a lot. [01:36:29.520 --> 01:36:30.520] Yes, sir. [01:36:30.520 --> 01:36:33.520] Anything else? [01:36:33.520 --> 01:36:34.520] That's it for tonight. [01:36:34.520 --> 01:36:35.520] Thanks again, man. [01:36:35.520 --> 01:36:36.520] You're welcome. [01:36:36.520 --> 01:36:37.520] Take care. [01:36:37.520 --> 01:36:38.520] All right. [01:36:38.520 --> 01:36:40.520] Now we're going to go to Armando in Texas. [01:36:40.520 --> 01:36:42.520] Armando, what can we do for you? [01:36:42.520 --> 01:36:43.520] Hey, Andy. [01:36:43.520 --> 01:36:44.520] How you doing? [01:36:44.520 --> 01:36:45.520] How's it going? [01:36:45.520 --> 01:36:47.520] It's going great so far. [01:36:47.520 --> 01:36:51.520] I think Dusty's going to have a new house soon. [01:36:51.520 --> 01:36:53.520] That is, you know, that's just unbelievable. [01:36:53.520 --> 01:36:55.520] I feel so sorry for that lady. [01:36:55.520 --> 01:37:04.520] I feel sorry for her, but I feel more sorry for the idiot that put her in this position because she's going to make him bite the big one before it's over. [01:37:04.520 --> 01:37:09.520] And I'm hoping she'll at least offer to buy dinner when I help her do it to him. [01:37:09.520 --> 01:37:18.520] I hope he gets it good because it's that kind of nonsense that these guys do to us regular folks. [01:37:18.520 --> 01:37:19.520] It's really. [01:37:19.520 --> 01:37:20.520] Oh, yeah. [01:37:20.520 --> 01:37:31.520] In all honesty, her story does not surprise me at all, especially in one of these little podunk wagon wheel towns because Round Rock – I'm sorry, not Round Rock. [01:37:31.520 --> 01:37:32.520] Shoot. [01:37:32.520 --> 01:37:33.520] I can't remember what the name of it is. [01:37:33.520 --> 01:37:35.520] The place where I got my ticket when I was headed home. [01:37:35.520 --> 01:37:36.520] But they're the same way. [01:37:36.520 --> 01:37:40.520] The cop was great, but the judge is a moron. [01:37:40.520 --> 01:37:41.520] Yeah, it's unbelievable. [01:37:41.520 --> 01:37:47.520] These municipal courts, they're the ones that get away with, you know, with things like this. [01:37:47.520 --> 01:37:51.520] And that's what drives me nuts about my situation. [01:37:51.520 --> 01:37:57.520] So, you know, I'm here in Georgetown, and I've come to talk to you about this. [01:37:57.520 --> 01:38:04.520] This case is still going on, and I think I saw you in person about, I don't know, a year ago maybe. [01:38:04.520 --> 01:38:05.520] And it's still going on. [01:38:05.520 --> 01:38:14.520] And I lost my case because I wasn't able to do it the way you wanted me to because it was already gone too far, and I was already – I already recognized the situation. [01:38:14.520 --> 01:38:16.520] You know how it is. [01:38:16.520 --> 01:38:17.520] Yeah. [01:38:17.520 --> 01:38:21.520] When you – you know how it is, basically what you're telling me. [01:38:21.520 --> 01:38:25.520] If you give them the authority, then you're kind of – it's kind of too late. [01:38:25.520 --> 01:38:29.520] You've got to basically say everything the way you – [01:38:29.520 --> 01:38:39.520] Exactly. Once you've taken the bait and stepped into the ring to fight on their terms, you're pretty well beat. [01:38:39.520 --> 01:38:51.520] Because their terms is going to always be the ref is on the other fighter's side, you're tied to the stool in the corner, and he doesn't have to wear gloves. [01:38:51.520 --> 01:38:57.520] And you have to wear king-size down pillows. [01:38:57.520 --> 01:39:05.520] So what I'm trying to do now is because, you know, I got into this through my brother-in-law Joe, then I guess Carl from my brother-in-law Bob Joe. [01:39:05.520 --> 01:39:10.520] And we've actually met at that one, I guess, I don't know, coffee shop. [01:39:10.520 --> 01:39:12.520] You probably – I don't know if you remember or not. [01:39:12.520 --> 01:39:14.520] But anyway, so I lost the case. [01:39:14.520 --> 01:39:21.520] I took it to jewelry trial, and I lost it on the deferred – I mean, a failure to yield to emergency vehicle. [01:39:21.520 --> 01:39:32.520] And – but no one was telling me that there's a way that I can – you know, the cop has to have certain credentials. [01:39:32.520 --> 01:39:38.520] And I'm just trying to figure out whether I should go that route or – because I'm appealing it at Williamson County, and the judge has already – [01:39:38.520 --> 01:39:45.520] I've been there three times, and they weren't ready, so Carl was telling me to do a failure to prosecute. [01:39:45.520 --> 01:39:56.520] So I'm calling today to figure out if that's what I should do, because the judge – the second time I went – okay, the first time they weren't ready. [01:39:56.520 --> 01:40:03.520] In fact, the prosecutor for Georgetown basically said, hey, look, you're going to lose. [01:40:03.520 --> 01:40:06.520] Because he was there for his own personal case. [01:40:06.520 --> 01:40:11.520] I guess he's an attorney for somebody else there on his own dime, I guess. [01:40:11.520 --> 01:40:16.520] He told me that I should just take the deal and not take it to court. [01:40:16.520 --> 01:40:19.520] So I said, no, I'm going to take it. [01:40:19.520 --> 01:40:22.520] So the judge – I went up there to call my name, and they weren't ready. [01:40:22.520 --> 01:40:24.520] So he goes, well – I said, well, I want it dismissed. [01:40:24.520 --> 01:40:26.520] And he goes, no, I need to give him another shot. [01:40:26.520 --> 01:40:34.520] So I went back last Monday, you know, and I tried to call on Monday, but kind of got on too late, because I forgot to call you. [01:40:34.520 --> 01:40:44.520] But actually, past Monday – so the past Monday, I went back for the second time, and they weren't ready again. [01:40:44.520 --> 01:40:51.520] So he said – he just dismissed me like, oh, the dirtbag, and said, no, we're going to reschedule it for October 27. [01:40:51.520 --> 01:40:52.520] Okay. [01:40:52.520 --> 01:40:54.520] When did your appeal take place? [01:40:54.520 --> 01:41:00.520] When did the new – when did the case get into the new court? [01:41:00.520 --> 01:41:07.520] You know, it's been about – this past Monday, then a month before that, then a month before that, then a month before that. [01:41:07.520 --> 01:41:15.520] So like three, four months ago, you know, because they're trying to give me some other deal because I don't know whether or not I should – [01:41:15.520 --> 01:41:20.520] Have you ever asked for a continuance in this case in this new court? [01:41:20.520 --> 01:41:21.520] No. [01:41:21.520 --> 01:41:22.520] Okay. [01:41:22.520 --> 01:41:28.520] Then what is currently in the court record as far as the complaint, the indictment, and all that? [01:41:28.520 --> 01:41:34.520] No, I just – you know, that the jury found me guilty. [01:41:34.520 --> 01:41:35.520] Well, no. [01:41:35.520 --> 01:41:39.520] I mean, the jury found you guilty in the original trial court, right? [01:41:39.520 --> 01:41:43.520] That was the municipal or the JP or was it the county court? [01:41:43.520 --> 01:41:44.520] The municipal. [01:41:44.520 --> 01:41:45.520] Okay. [01:41:45.520 --> 01:41:47.520] So that one's done, right? [01:41:47.520 --> 01:41:48.520] Mm-hmm. [01:41:48.520 --> 01:41:53.520] And you're in the county court or the county court at law now on a de novo appeal, right? [01:41:53.520 --> 01:41:54.520] Yes. [01:41:54.520 --> 01:41:58.520] When did that enter this de novo court? [01:41:58.520 --> 01:42:00.520] About four months ago. [01:42:00.520 --> 01:42:01.520] Okay. [01:42:01.520 --> 01:42:12.520] In this court's record, what do they have as far as paperwork in relation to the complaint and information and an indictment? [01:42:12.520 --> 01:42:16.520] I mean, I don't know that much about the law, Eddie, so I don't know. [01:42:16.520 --> 01:42:17.520] Okay. [01:42:17.520 --> 01:42:20.520] You need to go look at the court record in this new court. [01:42:20.520 --> 01:42:22.520] You need to see what documents are in it. [01:42:22.520 --> 01:42:28.520] If there is an actual complaint in there, you need to know when it was signed and when it was filed. [01:42:28.520 --> 01:42:36.520] Because in a Class C fine only, if they go beyond three months to prosecute, they have violated your right to a speedy trial, [01:42:36.520 --> 01:42:41.520] and you can demand a dismissal for it, and it will be a retroactive dismissal. [01:42:41.520 --> 01:42:45.520] Now, how long did the municipal court take to prosecute you? [01:42:45.520 --> 01:42:46.520] Oh, boy. [01:42:46.520 --> 01:42:53.520] It's been at least two years. [01:42:53.520 --> 01:42:57.520] So when did they file that complaint? [01:42:57.520 --> 01:43:00.520] Like two years ago in January. [01:43:00.520 --> 01:43:06.520] And it took them two years from the time they filed a complaint to actually do something? [01:43:06.520 --> 01:43:07.520] Yes. [01:43:07.520 --> 01:43:08.520] Okay. [01:43:08.520 --> 01:43:12.520] Then did you ever challenge jurisdiction for failure to provide a speedy trial? [01:43:12.520 --> 01:43:14.520] No, because I didn't know that. [01:43:14.520 --> 01:43:15.520] I didn't know that at all. [01:43:15.520 --> 01:43:20.520] You didn't tell me they had taken two years to do it either, or I would have told you that. [01:43:20.520 --> 01:43:22.520] No, I forgot to tell you that too. [01:43:22.520 --> 01:43:23.520] Okay. [01:43:23.520 --> 01:43:25.520] Folks, listen very carefully. [01:43:25.520 --> 01:43:31.520] Class C fine onlys, they have a target deadline from when the complaint is filed. [01:43:31.520 --> 01:43:36.520] If they go beyond three and a half to four months before they prosecute, [01:43:36.520 --> 01:43:41.520] they have violated speedy trial according to the Texas courts. [01:43:41.520 --> 01:43:42.520] You all hang in there. [01:43:42.520 --> 01:43:43.520] Armando, hold on. [01:43:43.520 --> 01:43:46.520] We'll be right back and we'll finish you up, okay? [01:43:46.520 --> 01:43:47.520] Okay. [01:43:47.520 --> 01:43:48.520] All right, folks. [01:43:48.520 --> 01:43:49.520] This is Rule of Law Radio. [01:43:49.520 --> 01:43:55.520] I got another segment left, and I hope I can finish up with Armando, Mike, and Stephen before we run out of time. [01:43:55.520 --> 01:43:56.520] You all hold on. [01:43:56.520 --> 01:43:59.520] I'll be right back. [01:43:59.520 --> 01:44:03.520] You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics? [01:44:03.520 --> 01:44:04.520] Sorry. [01:44:04.520 --> 01:44:07.520] Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve? [01:44:07.520 --> 01:44:08.520] What? [01:44:08.520 --> 01:44:12.520] If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity. [01:44:12.520 --> 01:44:13.520] Hi. [01:44:13.520 --> 01:44:14.520] My name is Steve Holt. [01:44:14.520 --> 01:44:18.520] And like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age. [01:44:18.520 --> 01:44:24.520] I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television. [01:44:24.520 --> 01:44:28.520] Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity. [01:44:28.520 --> 01:44:29.520] But there is hope. [01:44:29.520 --> 01:44:35.520] The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover. [01:44:35.520 --> 01:44:40.520] And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries [01:44:40.520 --> 01:44:42.520] without feeling tired or uninterested. [01:44:42.520 --> 01:44:50.520] So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 [01:44:50.520 --> 01:44:54.520] or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com. [01:44:54.520 --> 01:44:57.520] Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary [01:44:57.520 --> 01:45:00.520] and an overall increase in mental functioning. [01:45:00.520 --> 01:45:03.520] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:03.520 --> 01:45:07.520] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary. [01:45:07.520 --> 01:45:15.520] The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:15.520 --> 01:45:19.520] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.520 --> 01:45:23.520] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.520 --> 01:45:28.520] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.520 --> 01:45:34.520] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.520 --> 01:45:38.520] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:38.520 --> 01:45:43.520] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.520 --> 01:45:49.520] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:49.520 --> 01:45:52.520] pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.520 --> 01:46:19.520] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:19.520 --> 01:46:22.520] All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, [01:46:22.520 --> 01:46:24.520] and we are talking with Armando in Texas. [01:46:24.520 --> 01:46:28.520] All right, Armando, yeah, you need to check that record, [01:46:28.520 --> 01:46:32.520] find out what documentation is in it, see if a complaint does exist, [01:46:32.520 --> 01:46:38.520] and if an information does exist, and what date it was signed and filed, [01:46:38.520 --> 01:46:41.520] and then start counting dates. [01:46:41.520 --> 01:46:46.520] Okay, so I did file the appeal, went down there and paid a bond, [01:46:46.520 --> 01:46:52.520] I guess they call it a bond, to the municipal court, and so then they... [01:46:52.520 --> 01:46:55.520] When did you do this? [01:46:55.520 --> 01:46:57.520] Four or five months ago. [01:46:57.520 --> 01:47:00.520] Okay, as long as we're still in the same timeline, go ahead. [01:47:00.520 --> 01:47:07.520] Okay, so should I do probably a motion to dismiss on failure to prosecute? [01:47:07.520 --> 01:47:15.520] No, it's motion to dismiss failure to provide a speedy trial, not failure to prosecute. [01:47:15.520 --> 01:47:18.520] Get it right, because if you do failure to prosecute, [01:47:18.520 --> 01:47:20.520] they're going to start prosecuting. [01:47:20.520 --> 01:47:25.520] Whereas failure to provide a speedy trial, they are out of time to prosecute. [01:47:25.520 --> 01:47:28.520] Big difference in the two. [01:47:28.520 --> 01:47:33.520] Okay, so there is documentation in there, you need to find it. [01:47:33.520 --> 01:47:37.520] Yeah, you need to find the Texas case law relating to Class C misdemeanors [01:47:37.520 --> 01:47:41.520] and failure to provide a speedy trial within three to four months. [01:47:41.520 --> 01:47:48.520] Use that as support for your motion to dismiss, but make sure you get your dates right. [01:47:48.520 --> 01:47:53.520] Okay, so what if they blow that off and we go to court again and then... [01:47:53.520 --> 01:47:57.520] Then you stand by it, you object to it, failure to provide a speedy trial, [01:47:57.520 --> 01:48:01.520] and you keep that up all the way to the appeals court. [01:48:01.520 --> 01:48:03.520] Okay. [01:48:03.520 --> 01:48:06.520] Don't stop just because they continue. [01:48:06.520 --> 01:48:09.520] They're the one breaking the rules by continuing, let them do it, [01:48:09.520 --> 01:48:14.520] because when that happens and they've acted without jurisdiction by doing so, [01:48:14.520 --> 01:48:18.520] you can sue everybody. [01:48:18.520 --> 01:48:20.520] That's malicious prosecution. [01:48:20.520 --> 01:48:21.520] You can win. [01:48:21.520 --> 01:48:23.520] Kill them. [01:48:23.520 --> 01:48:25.520] That's what I'm up to do. [01:48:25.520 --> 01:48:28.520] I can understand and relate with what Dustin's going through, [01:48:28.520 --> 01:48:33.520] because I pulled over within 12 seconds for the guy. [01:48:33.520 --> 01:48:35.520] He wasn't going to an emergency. [01:48:35.520 --> 01:48:40.520] It wasn't like I blew by the guy going 65 miles an hour. [01:48:40.520 --> 01:48:46.520] He was pulling me over for a fake speeding thing that was non-existent. [01:48:46.520 --> 01:48:48.520] He probably made that up because it was at night. [01:48:48.520 --> 01:48:50.520] Yeah, that's exactly the way it's going to work. [01:48:50.520 --> 01:48:56.520] I pulled him over in a nice area, and he gave me a ticket for that. [01:48:56.520 --> 01:48:59.520] It's just so unbelievable. [01:48:59.520 --> 01:49:01.520] Yeah, well, definitely. [01:49:01.520 --> 01:49:05.520] When I say kill them, I mean kill them judicially, of course, you know that, right? [01:49:05.520 --> 01:49:06.520] Yep. [01:49:06.520 --> 01:49:07.520] Okay, just making sure. [01:49:07.520 --> 01:49:09.520] I don't want any wires getting crossed here. [01:49:09.520 --> 01:49:12.520] I appreciate that, and we'll come by and see you on a Sunday. [01:49:12.520 --> 01:49:14.520] All right, Armando, y'all take care. [01:49:14.520 --> 01:49:17.520] And, yes, folks, we are having class this upcoming Sunday. [01:49:17.520 --> 01:49:20.520] We didn't this past Sunday because I was in Lubbock. [01:49:20.520 --> 01:49:23.520] All right, Armando, you have a great night. [01:49:23.520 --> 01:49:24.520] You too. [01:49:24.520 --> 01:49:26.520] All right, now we're going to go to Mike in Montana. [01:49:26.520 --> 01:49:29.520] Mike, what you got? [01:49:29.520 --> 01:49:30.520] Are you there? [01:49:30.520 --> 01:49:31.520] I'm here. [01:49:31.520 --> 01:49:32.520] Are you there? [01:49:32.520 --> 01:49:34.520] This is Mike in Missouri. [01:49:34.520 --> 01:49:35.520] Oh, Missouri. [01:49:35.520 --> 01:49:36.520] Okay, I'm sorry. [01:49:36.520 --> 01:49:37.520] I'm misreading here. [01:49:37.520 --> 01:49:38.520] Okay. [01:49:38.520 --> 01:49:42.520] I have a quick question about the legislative history. [01:49:42.520 --> 01:49:48.520] I called up at the Secretary of State's office, and after getting the run around the first [01:49:48.520 --> 01:49:56.520] time around, I finally got a lady in the state archives by the name of Denise who told me [01:49:56.520 --> 01:50:04.520] that the last time that the statutes had been certified was in 1899. [01:50:04.520 --> 01:50:06.520] No, they're not. [01:50:06.520 --> 01:50:07.520] Look in the front. [01:50:07.520 --> 01:50:14.520] Well, now, in your state, that might be true. [01:50:14.520 --> 01:50:16.520] That very well could be true. [01:50:16.520 --> 01:50:22.520] But unless there's been a legislative enactment that does not require the statutes to be certified [01:50:22.520 --> 01:50:27.520] any longer, why did they stop? [01:50:27.520 --> 01:50:29.520] That's a good question. [01:50:29.520 --> 01:50:38.520] But they made a change that the reviser of statute is the one who does the certifying. [01:50:38.520 --> 01:50:41.520] Yeah, but they're not doing it either. [01:50:41.520 --> 01:50:45.520] Well, the legislative history on that only goes back to 1949. [01:50:45.520 --> 01:50:48.520] Yeah, and in Texas, it's 1963. [01:50:48.520 --> 01:50:53.520] They call it the Statutory Revision Committee here in Texas. [01:50:53.520 --> 01:51:04.520] Yes, and that's what they created was the Revision Committee, and it only goes back to 1949, [01:51:04.520 --> 01:51:08.520] page 545. [01:51:08.520 --> 01:51:09.520] Okay. [01:51:09.520 --> 01:51:13.520] What you need to do is start backtracking your statutory revisions. [01:51:13.520 --> 01:51:19.520] At the very beginning of every statute, you will probably find language similar to this. [01:51:19.520 --> 01:51:25.520] This has been created by our statutory revision program, blah, blah, blah, instituted at this date [01:51:25.520 --> 01:51:27.520] and this time, blah, blah, blah. [01:51:27.520 --> 01:51:34.520] And these statutes are propagations of the law without substantive change. [01:51:34.520 --> 01:51:40.520] Those three words are the ones you're looking for, without substantive change. [01:51:40.520 --> 01:51:45.520] What that means is, allegedly, the statutes have been updated to modern English, [01:51:45.520 --> 01:51:51.520] constitutionality, and blah, blah, blah, but we haven't made any fundamental subject matter changes [01:51:51.520 --> 01:51:53.520] to the statutes. [01:51:53.520 --> 01:51:58.520] And then you start backtracking from every enactment all the way back, [01:51:58.520 --> 01:52:05.520] for whatever it is you're researching, to see when they first made that declaration. [01:52:05.520 --> 01:52:14.520] Because immediately prior to that will be the last official set of statutes that were enacted. [01:52:14.520 --> 01:52:15.520] Okay. [01:52:15.520 --> 01:52:17.520] I've started that already. [01:52:17.520 --> 01:52:25.520] The last one was in 2011, and then the first one was 1939, [01:52:25.520 --> 01:52:29.520] for the one that I have allegedly violated anyway. [01:52:29.520 --> 01:52:35.520] In 1939, when they were still certifying statutes, if they were, [01:52:35.520 --> 01:52:39.520] what year did they say the statutes they were certifying [01:52:39.520 --> 01:52:46.520] or the legislative enactments they were certifying belonged to? [01:52:46.520 --> 01:52:48.520] Because when you actually research that here in Texas, [01:52:48.520 --> 01:52:53.520] the last secretary of state certification said that these statutes are a true and accurate reflection [01:52:53.520 --> 01:53:00.520] of the underlying laws of 1925 by the 56th legislature of the state of Texas. [01:53:00.520 --> 01:53:06.520] Yeah, well, she told me the last time that the secretary actually done it was 1899, [01:53:06.520 --> 01:53:16.520] and at some point, but see, even that statute that says that the reviser of statute now does it [01:53:16.520 --> 01:53:22.520] only goes back to the, at the bottom of every, on the online section, [01:53:22.520 --> 01:53:26.520] it gives a basic history down at the bottom. [01:53:26.520 --> 01:53:31.520] It only goes back to 1949, but this statute that I alleged to have violated [01:53:31.520 --> 01:53:34.520] goes all the way back to 1939. [01:53:34.520 --> 01:53:41.520] So I don't know how he could have certified them, the reviser of statutes, [01:53:41.520 --> 01:53:46.520] if there was no authority for him until 1949. [01:53:46.520 --> 01:53:50.520] Well, when he certified it, which enactments did he say they reflected? [01:53:50.520 --> 01:53:52.520] And it's easy for him to do that. [01:53:52.520 --> 01:53:58.520] If the enactments existed prior to him, all he has to do is compare the new statutory revision [01:53:58.520 --> 01:54:04.520] to the original enactment that predated his position and see whether or not they're accurate. [01:54:04.520 --> 01:54:07.520] Does the statute match the underlying law? [01:54:07.520 --> 01:54:09.520] That's all he's certifying. [01:54:09.520 --> 01:54:15.520] So it actually is required that the statute existed before he was there to certify it [01:54:15.520 --> 01:54:20.520] or that he, or that he can't certify it without them both being there. [01:54:20.520 --> 01:54:23.520] You see what I'm saying? [01:54:23.520 --> 01:54:24.520] Okay. [01:54:24.520 --> 01:54:35.520] Now, statute 3.090 says that when any volume, and it goes on, say all that, [01:54:35.520 --> 01:54:41.520] the reviser of statute shall certify that all laws predidarian have been examined [01:54:41.520 --> 01:54:47.520] and compared as required by this section, and that the same are true and correct copies thereof, [01:54:47.520 --> 01:54:50.520] as passed and remain in the Office of the Secretary of State, [01:54:50.520 --> 01:54:57.520] and that the revised statute and all laws therein contained are true copies of the existing law. [01:54:57.520 --> 01:55:01.520] Yeah, but what are they certifying as the existing law? [01:55:01.520 --> 01:55:10.520] They have to tell you what the existing law is by legislative session and year. [01:55:10.520 --> 01:55:16.520] So what's he certifying it against? [01:55:16.520 --> 01:55:20.520] Well, I haven't found that yet because none of it's available online. [01:55:20.520 --> 01:55:23.520] Missouri is one of those states that doesn't hardly record anything. [01:55:23.520 --> 01:55:28.520] Yeah, then find whatever your public records request says you can do [01:55:28.520 --> 01:55:33.520] and petition this guy for a public records request dating to what laws [01:55:33.520 --> 01:55:37.520] he is allegedly certifying all statutory revisions against [01:55:37.520 --> 01:55:44.520] and the documentation associated with his duty to do so. [01:55:44.520 --> 01:55:45.520] Okay. [01:55:45.520 --> 01:55:49.520] Okay. [01:55:49.520 --> 01:55:51.520] All righty, I appreciate it. [01:55:51.520 --> 01:55:53.520] All right, Mike, good luck. [01:55:53.520 --> 01:55:54.520] Thank you, sir. [01:55:54.520 --> 01:55:55.520] You're welcome. [01:55:55.520 --> 01:55:56.520] You have a great night. [01:55:56.520 --> 01:55:57.520] You too. [01:55:57.520 --> 01:55:58.520] You too. [01:55:58.520 --> 01:55:59.520] All right. [01:55:59.520 --> 01:56:01.520] All right, now we're going to go to Stephen in Idaho. [01:56:01.520 --> 01:56:04.520] Stephen, what can we do for you? [01:56:04.520 --> 01:56:07.520] Yeah, quick question. [01:56:07.520 --> 01:56:12.520] You used to talk about a guy in California that he was a go-to guy for tickets, [01:56:12.520 --> 01:56:13.520] resolving tickets. [01:56:13.520 --> 01:56:15.520] There are a couple there. [01:56:15.520 --> 01:56:20.520] There is Kevin Michaels and there is a gentleman by the name of Rick. [01:56:20.520 --> 01:56:26.520] I can't remember his last name at the moment, but there are two. [01:56:26.520 --> 01:56:30.520] If you're wanting their contact information, please send me an email, [01:56:30.520 --> 01:56:33.520] and I will be happy to send you back their information. [01:56:33.520 --> 01:56:40.520] My email is Eddie, E-D-D-I-E at ruleoflawradio.com. [01:56:40.520 --> 01:56:41.520] Great. [01:56:41.520 --> 01:56:42.520] I appreciate your time. [01:56:42.520 --> 01:56:43.520] Yes, sir. [01:56:43.520 --> 01:56:47.520] All right, folks, believe it or not, I got the caller board emptied [01:56:47.520 --> 01:56:50.520] with a good two minutes to spare here. [01:56:50.520 --> 01:56:51.520] Ain't I good tonight? [01:56:51.520 --> 01:56:55.520] Oh, well, for all you folks that have been listening and calling in, [01:56:55.520 --> 01:56:59.520] thank you so much for helping us here at the network [01:56:59.520 --> 01:57:03.520] and supporting us by listening and financially to keep us on the air [01:57:03.520 --> 01:57:05.520] and able to function. [01:57:05.520 --> 01:57:10.520] Again, I am still working on getting toweloflaw.com launched. [01:57:10.520 --> 01:57:13.520] We are still trying to get stuff implemented and hooked together, [01:57:13.520 --> 01:57:16.520] time and money and effort being what it is. [01:57:16.520 --> 01:57:20.520] We're hemorrhaging finances to keep the server running for the development, [01:57:20.520 --> 01:57:24.520] but we're not bringing any money in to help it stay alive. [01:57:24.520 --> 01:57:30.520] So if you can and will and desire to do so, any contributions you could make [01:57:30.520 --> 01:57:33.520] directly to me to help pay the bills on the development server [01:57:33.520 --> 01:57:38.520] so that we can get this done quicker without having to reacquire each [01:57:38.520 --> 01:57:42.520] and every month a new server to have to put it on, that would be great, [01:57:42.520 --> 01:57:46.520] because we've got to get this done, we've got to get this launched, [01:57:46.520 --> 01:57:50.520] because what we're offering in the tools and availability of those tools [01:57:50.520 --> 01:57:56.520] is going to help us tremendously in our fight on every front. [01:57:56.520 --> 01:58:00.520] And it won't be just Texas, it will be nation and worldwide [01:58:00.520 --> 01:58:05.520] where you can collaborate with people in your area to learn, to study, [01:58:05.520 --> 01:58:11.520] to organize and formulate plans on how to solve the issues we're facing [01:58:11.520 --> 01:58:16.520] with those that are supposed to be working for us but refuse to do so. [01:58:16.520 --> 01:58:21.520] So please, go to the website, make a donation to Eddie if you can, [01:58:21.520 --> 01:58:26.520] that money will be used to try to keep me in enough food and bills [01:58:26.520 --> 01:58:30.520] and the server up and running so that I can be able to get this done, [01:58:30.520 --> 01:58:33.520] because I'm trying to develop the content we need to make it worthwhile [01:58:33.520 --> 01:58:37.520] for you guys as well as the ideas for getting it going. [01:58:37.520 --> 01:58:40.520] Y'all, thanks for listening, thanks for your support, [01:58:40.520 --> 01:58:50.520] y'all have a great and blessed week, good night, God bless. [01:58:50.520 --> 01:58:55.520] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible [01:58:55.520 --> 01:58:58.520] called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:58.520 --> 01:59:01.520] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes [01:59:01.520 --> 01:59:04.520] that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, [01:59:04.520 --> 01:59:08.520] helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.520 --> 01:59:11.520] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.520 --> 01:59:20.520] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.520 --> 01:59:25.520] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:25.520 --> 01:59:30.520] plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.520 --> 01:59:32.520] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.520 --> 01:59:35.520] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, [01:59:35.520 --> 01:59:40.520] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:40.520 --> 01:59:49.520] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:49.520 --> 01:59:52.520] Looking for some truth? [01:59:52.520 --> 02:00:06.520] You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.