[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates.
[00:07.000 --> 00:09.000]  Online at TheLibertyBeat.com.
[00:09.000 --> 00:13.000]  I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, May 12, 2014.
[00:13.000 --> 00:16.000]  Gold opened today at $1,302.
[00:16.000 --> 00:18.000]  Silver opened at $19.58.
[00:18.000 --> 00:21.000]  And Bitcoin is trading at $439.
[00:21.000 --> 00:25.000]  Support for the Liberty Beat comes from GrowYourOwnGroceries.org.
[00:25.000 --> 00:29.000]  Now offering an eight-week course where you can learn how to treat the most common family elements
[00:29.000 --> 00:32.000]  with simple medicines that you can grow or easily find.
[00:32.000 --> 00:35.000]  Learn more at GrowYourOwnGroceries.org.
[00:35.000 --> 00:41.000]  And support comes from Bitmain Tech, creators of the newly released Antminer S2 Bitcoin Miner,
[00:41.000 --> 00:44.000]  one tera hash, and only 1,000 watts.
[00:44.000 --> 00:47.000]  Order yours online today at BitmainTech.com.
[00:47.000 --> 00:49.000]  Or call them up, 844-BITMAIN.
[00:49.000 --> 00:52.000]  That's 844-248-6246.
[00:52.000 --> 00:55.000]  In the news, on Tuesday, May 5,
[00:55.000 --> 00:59.000]  representatives from fluoride-free San Marcos rallied at City Hall
[00:59.000 --> 01:02.000]  to ask the mayor and city council to approve a resolution
[01:02.000 --> 01:05.000]  to end water fluoridation in the city of San Marcos.
[01:05.000 --> 01:09.000]  John Bush, founder of the Liberty Beat, and Catherine Bleich of Sovereign Living,
[01:09.000 --> 01:12.000]  spoke in favor of ending fluoridation.
[01:12.000 --> 01:19.000]  San Marcos Mayor Daniel Guerrero remained open to the topic and requested more information.
[01:19.000 --> 01:23.000]  High risk for water contamination and other environmental damage.
[01:23.000 --> 01:28.000]  That's what a Government Accountability Office report reveals about thousands of oil and gas wells
[01:28.000 --> 01:30.000]  the government has failed to inspect.
[01:30.000 --> 01:34.000]  The Associated Press reports the findings highlight substantial gaps in oversight
[01:34.000 --> 01:39.000]  by the agency that manages oil and gas development on federal and Indian lands.
[01:39.000 --> 01:42.000]  Additionally, the agency's audit states the Bureau of Land Management
[01:42.000 --> 01:50.000]  failed to effectively coordinate with state regulators in New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Utah.
[01:50.000 --> 01:55.000]  The Waluna-Martu First Nation of Western Australia is engaged in a fight
[01:55.000 --> 01:58.000]  against the possible expansion of a uranium mining project.
[01:58.000 --> 02:03.000]  Indigenous rights activists and anti-nuclear groups have accused Toro Energy,
[02:03.000 --> 02:06.000]  a promoting junk science, regarding the safety of the project.
[02:06.000 --> 02:10.000]  The group fears the mines are dangerous to human health and the environment.
[02:10.000 --> 02:16.000]  Waluna elder Glenn Cook called it the duty of those who care about the Earth and people to resist the project.
[02:16.000 --> 02:19.000]  The mine is scheduled to be operational within the next year.
[02:19.000 --> 02:26.000]  Support for Liberty Beat comes from Affordable Sound, CD and DVD duplication, along with posters and promotions materials.
[02:26.000 --> 02:31.000]  Mention promo code LIBERTY and when you order 10 or more posters, you get 10 free.
[02:31.000 --> 02:37.000]  Online at AffordableSound.com or call them up 512-459-5253.
[02:37.000 --> 02:43.000]  And support comes from Voice and Exit, maximizing human flourishing through radical innovation.
[02:43.000 --> 02:45.000]  Tickets on sale now.
[02:45.000 --> 02:49.000]  Get 10% off with promo code FREEDOM, June 21st at Austin Music Hall.
[02:49.000 --> 02:53.000]  Get yours at VoiceAndExit.com.
[02:53.000 --> 02:57.000]  This is the Liberty Beat for Monday, May 12, 2014.
[02:57.000 --> 03:01.000]  Check out the website at thelibertybeat.com.
[03:01.000 --> 03:16.000]  Music
[03:16.000 --> 03:39.000]  Really man, come on, six o'clock news says somebody been shot, somebody's been viewed, somebody blew up a building, somebody stole a car, somebody got away, somebody didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far.
[03:39.000 --> 03:47.000]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day, son, when a man had to answer for the weed that he dug.
[03:47.000 --> 04:01.000]  He'd take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them bad boys, hang them high in the street, for all the people to see.
[04:01.000 --> 04:09.000]  That justice is one thing you should always find, you gotta saddle up your boys, you gotta draw a hard line.
[04:09.000 --> 04:17.000]  When the guns for the saddles will sing a victory tune and we'll all be back at the local school.
[04:17.000 --> 04:34.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing, let's get for my men before my horses.
[04:34.000 --> 04:38.000]  All right, folks, good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show.
[04:38.000 --> 04:45.000]  It is May 12, 2014, and it is another Monday night off and running.
[04:45.000 --> 04:55.000]  All right, now, something that I want to discuss a little bit tonight deals with the stuff that I'm trying to get integrated into the new book
[04:55.000 --> 05:01.000]  and into the procedures of how we go to court, as you all or should most of you are aware.
[05:01.000 --> 05:11.000]  I've already done a script for the transportation stop, which, unfortunately, too many people are using without being properly prepared to use,
[05:11.000 --> 05:15.000]  and then they're wanting to know what to do after they've used it.
[05:15.000 --> 05:23.000]  Folks, before you begin to use that script, you need to learn how to fight what they're going to do to you.
[05:23.000 --> 05:27.000]  It's not rocket science to figure that out.
[05:27.000 --> 05:32.000]  How do you intend to start a fight with somebody bigger and more experienced with you,
[05:32.000 --> 05:38.000]  and you never have bothered to learn how to fight yourself?
[05:38.000 --> 05:45.000]  The odds are not good. It's one thing to stand up to a bully because you have no choice in that moment.
[05:45.000 --> 05:50.000]  It's another thing to think ahead and prepare to take the bully on and take him down.
[05:50.000 --> 05:59.000]  You've got to think, folks, please, because there's not a lot I can do for you about what to say and do at a stop
[05:59.000 --> 06:05.000]  if you're not contacting me until after it's already happened and you're already hairline deep in trouble
[06:05.000 --> 06:09.000]  because you did or didn't do something the right way.
[06:09.000 --> 06:16.000]  Until you know everything about how to handle what comes after the stop, you're taking a great risk,
[06:16.000 --> 06:20.000]  and then you're asking me to bail you out when you've only got a few days to deal with it
[06:20.000 --> 06:25.000]  because you're taking so long to either let me know it happened or you're not preparing,
[06:25.000 --> 06:34.000]  and I have no clue what you did wrong or right at the time, which makes my telling you anything almost impossible
[06:34.000 --> 06:43.000]  because I tell you to do A, B, and C. Unfortunately, A, B, C, and works only if you haven't done X, Y, Z.
[06:43.000 --> 06:46.000]  And I don't know whether you've done it or not. You see the problem?
[06:46.000 --> 06:50.000]  So if you're going to use the script, try to be prepared before you start that fight.
[06:50.000 --> 06:57.000]  The other one is the cross-examination script about how to deal with examination of state's witness
[06:57.000 --> 07:01.000]  after state has performed its direct examination.
[07:01.000 --> 07:07.000]  And what I'm working on now is two scripts. At the moment, they're combined.
[07:07.000 --> 07:18.000]  But the two scripts that I'm working on at the moment are jury voir dire and pretrial issues with the judge.
[07:18.000 --> 07:25.000]  Basically, I'm trying to formulate a script of questions that will allow us to get specific facts into the record,
[07:25.000 --> 07:35.000]  and if it's a court of no record, into the ears of court watchers that can then verify the facts of what they saw
[07:35.000 --> 07:41.000]  and heard and the questions that were asked and either answered a particular way or refused to be answered
[07:41.000 --> 07:45.000]  into affidavits that you can then file in your case.
[07:45.000 --> 07:54.000]  Because here's the problem with the way the courts are being conducted in these class C fine-only situations.
[07:54.000 --> 08:01.000]  And it doesn't matter what particular republic of the union you're in, they all handle it the same way.
[08:01.000 --> 08:05.000]  Deprivation of rights under color of law. There are no ifs, ands, or buts.
[08:05.000 --> 08:11.000]  There are no good lower courts that if they're prosecuting these cases,
[08:11.000 --> 08:17.000]  instead of attempting to determine whether or not you were ever engaged in an activity
[08:17.000 --> 08:23.000]  that would give them standing to prosecute you, this is not a good court. I don't care who's in it.
[08:23.000 --> 08:26.000]  It's the same argument as there's no such thing as a good cop,
[08:26.000 --> 08:33.000]  because a good cop would be trying to arrest the bad cops when he sees them doing something wrong,
[08:33.000 --> 08:41.000]  just like he would arrest an actual other type of criminal that isn't wearing a shiny badge and clothes like he's got on.
[08:41.000 --> 08:50.000]  Okay? So these courts have already rigged this system, and from the very moment the traffic stop begins,
[08:50.000 --> 08:56.000]  the system kicks into high gear to deprive you of every single protected right you have.
[08:56.000 --> 09:04.000]  In fact, I got an email today from someone in Idaho or Iowa or somewhere like that.
[09:04.000 --> 09:07.000]  I can't remember right off the top of my head. I've gotten 10 phone calls since then.
[09:07.000 --> 09:16.000]  But he was telling me how he got pulled over, and the cop came up and asked for the information, as they always do,
[09:16.000 --> 09:21.000]  and he simply said, upon advice of counsel, I can't provide you with anything else.
[09:21.000 --> 09:27.000]  And I'm like, well, that is not the way the script tells you to make that known to the officer,
[09:27.000 --> 09:34.000]  so I have no clue if this person was following the script or just winging it. I have no idea.
[09:34.000 --> 09:43.000]  Therefore, I have no clue as to what that person did at any other point during the stop, nor why the stop even began.
[09:43.000 --> 09:47.000]  So I don't really have a jumping-off point in which to recommend anything
[09:47.000 --> 09:52.000]  other than get the audio and video from everybody that was present.
[09:52.000 --> 09:56.000]  And if you made any, get that, too, and get it all together.
[09:56.000 --> 10:01.000]  And if you didn't make one, shame on you. Go look in the mirror and punch yourself twice,
[10:01.000 --> 10:09.000]  because I've told you and told you and told you, folks, you never walk out your front door or answer it, for that matter,
[10:09.000 --> 10:17.000]  without a recording device in your immediate possession, ever.
[10:17.000 --> 10:24.000]  You are literally risking your life and welfare if you do.
[10:24.000 --> 10:31.000]  And if you don't believe that, go on YouTube and just look around at various types of recordings that have been made,
[10:31.000 --> 10:38.000]  police brutality, break-ins, assaults, some by civilians, some by cops, and so on and so forth.
[10:38.000 --> 10:42.000]  And you'll see exactly what I'm talking about.
[10:42.000 --> 10:47.000]  So that choice is yours, but please don't come running to me to say, help me, help me,
[10:47.000 --> 10:55.000]  when I have absolutely nothing to go on as far as what kind of help you're even needing
[10:55.000 --> 11:01.000]  and what happened that we can use, because I don't know if I wasn't there.
[11:01.000 --> 11:05.000]  So I either need a full accounting from you as to what happened, and it needs to be accurate,
[11:05.000 --> 11:12.000]  it needs to be accurate, it needs to be truthful, or I need to see and hear the audio and video that will tell me.
[11:12.000 --> 11:18.000]  But even on top of that, you have to remember, I am in Texas.
[11:18.000 --> 11:23.000]  This is where my research into the laws has been the strongest.
[11:23.000 --> 11:27.000]  It's where my information and knowledge is the strongest.
[11:27.000 --> 11:34.000]  It is going to be your responsibility to find what you need to find in the laws where you live.
[11:34.000 --> 11:37.000]  So keep all of that in mind.
[11:37.000 --> 11:46.000]  But anyway, back to this script of pretrial issues and due process violations and the jury voir dire.
[11:46.000 --> 11:49.000]  I want to go over a couple of things in this script.
[11:49.000 --> 11:51.000]  I'm not going to go over the whole thing.
[11:51.000 --> 11:57.000]  But I just want to show you some of the things that will point out, beginning with these questions,
[11:57.000 --> 12:04.000]  as to just how many of your rights these courts know they are violating.
[12:04.000 --> 12:08.000]  There is no question that they know they're violating them,
[12:08.000 --> 12:14.000]  because the moment you get into the issue with the court about why am I being deprived of this right,
[12:14.000 --> 12:22.000]  that's when the court ceases to answer any questions and then starts to move forward by bully and force.
[12:22.000 --> 12:25.000]  They know.
[12:25.000 --> 12:33.000]  And if they don't know, that's proof positive they should have never been put in this position in the first place.
[12:33.000 --> 12:41.000]  Because how do you sit in judgment as to violations of law when you have no clue,
[12:41.000 --> 12:45.000]  one, anything about the law they're being charged with,
[12:45.000 --> 12:52.000]  and two, the laws and statutes and rules and procedures that govern how you are required
[12:52.000 --> 12:59.000]  to carry on and conduct those proceedings to ensure that they are fair and impartial
[12:59.000 --> 13:04.000]  and that the rights of all parties are properly and fully protected?
[13:04.000 --> 13:14.000]  How do you get into that position when you cannot demonstrate that you are competent to provide that in that manner?
[13:14.000 --> 13:17.000]  Well, because I know somebody.
[13:17.000 --> 13:19.000]  Yeah, exactly.
[13:19.000 --> 13:24.000]  You know somebody, but you don't know a damn thing about what you're doing.
[13:24.000 --> 13:27.000]  That is a problem.
[13:27.000 --> 13:39.000]  But folks, you're just as bad as they are when you go into this situation unprepared and expect to prevail.
[13:39.000 --> 13:48.000]  Even worse, you're somewhat delusional if you expect to prevail on paperwork alone.
[13:48.000 --> 13:53.000]  Because this is about money, and it ain't a little bit.
[13:53.000 --> 13:55.000]  It's a lot.
[13:55.000 --> 14:05.000]  In case you haven't noticed, every small town in America that is starving for cash uses their police department
[14:05.000 --> 14:10.000]  to increase that revenue flow.
[14:10.000 --> 14:13.000]  They can't raise the property taxes if it requires a vote of the people.
[14:13.000 --> 14:20.000]  They can't go around and increase zoning ordinances and things to allow new business to come in if the people don't approve
[14:20.000 --> 14:22.000]  and so on and so forth.
[14:22.000 --> 14:31.000]  But they can surely tell their police department, you start making sure to get as much money out of these people as you can.
[14:31.000 --> 14:37.000]  And they don't need a vote by the people to make that happen.
[14:37.000 --> 14:46.000]  There is no such thing anywhere where the police and the people they work for are allowed to collect money in fines and fees
[14:46.000 --> 14:52.000]  that that system is not being abused if it is being enforced.
[14:52.000 --> 14:54.000]  Period.
[14:54.000 --> 15:00.000]  They're simply too much money at stake.
[15:00.000 --> 15:02.000]  Now, you want to prove that to yourself?
[15:02.000 --> 15:09.000]  Go to whatever city you live in, to the city secretary or whoever the city financial officer is,
[15:09.000 --> 15:13.000]  the treasurer, the comptroller, whatever their title is in your city.
[15:13.000 --> 15:23.000]  You go to them and you file a public information request that asks for a summarization of information
[15:23.000 --> 15:34.000]  and records for a financial accounting relating to all traffic citations issued by the police department
[15:34.000 --> 15:47.000]  and a dissemination report of all revenues garnered by those citations broken down by where they are distributed to.
[15:47.000 --> 15:54.000]  And you will see exactly where all the money they're taking in goes.
[15:54.000 --> 15:58.000]  And you will also get to see how much it is.
[15:58.000 --> 16:08.000]  And here in Austin, it's tens of millions of dollars a year that Austin gets to keep.
[16:08.000 --> 16:21.000]  32.6 million in 2010. I haven't got reports for 11, 12 or 13 or 14, but the one I got from 2010 shows they collected 64 million plus.
[16:21.000 --> 16:27.000]  Half of that went to the state, as all transportation citations do.
[16:27.000 --> 16:35.000]  The other half is kept by whatever legal public corporation wrote the citation, whether it be county or city.
[16:35.000 --> 16:39.000]  And then it's distributed for whatever they want to do with it,
[16:39.000 --> 16:45.000]  even though the statute specifically says they can only allocate those funds to very specific things.
[16:45.000 --> 16:51.000]  But get that report and you'll find out that it's probably going to places it was never authorized by law to go.
[16:51.000 --> 16:54.000]  All right, folks, I'm going to go into this script a little bit more on the other side.
[16:54.000 --> 17:00.000]  Callers on the board, y'all hang on. I will get with y'all, so please don't drop off or disappear. We'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.000 --> 17:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.000 --> 17:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.000 --> 17:25.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.000 --> 17:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:31.000 --> 17:39.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:39.000 --> 17:47.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:47.000 --> 17:51.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.000 --> 18:00.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Maris proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:14.000]  Michael Maris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too.
[18:14.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.000 --> 18:26.000]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:26.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:38.000]  The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner, or email michaelmaris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.000 --> 19:00.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:11.000 --> 19:34.000]  Look what we got in the eyes of a Christian. I wonder what I don't have to answer. Open your eyes.
[19:34.000 --> 19:47.000]  Look what we got in the eyes of a Christian. I wonder what I don't have to answer. Open your eyes.
[19:47.000 --> 19:49.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[19:49.000 --> 19:54.000]  All right, I understand that we have one new caller on the board, and that he's having problems staying connected.
[19:54.000 --> 20:03.000]  So for his sake, I'm going to go ahead and take his call, and then I'm going to get into the other stuff here that I'm dealing with on this script.
[20:03.000 --> 20:06.000]  So the rest of y'all, please don't get impatient. Please hang on.
[20:06.000 --> 20:09.000]  All right, Troy in Illinois, what can I do for you?
[20:09.000 --> 20:12.000]  Hey, thanks for taking my call. I hope I don't get disconnected.
[20:12.000 --> 20:21.000]  Hey, I had to appear in court about three months ago for driving with a suspended license, which I'd actually ended up retracting my license completely.
[20:21.000 --> 20:25.000]  So I don't use one to drive. And with the information I got, I was-
[20:25.000 --> 20:27.000]  Okay, wait a minute. Do you drive?
[20:27.000 --> 20:30.000]  I do. No, I'm a traveler.
[20:30.000 --> 20:34.000]  Okay. You need to start checking your terminology.
[20:34.000 --> 20:35.000]  Okay.
[20:35.000 --> 20:39.000]  Because if you drive, you better have a license.
[20:39.000 --> 20:41.000]  I am a traveler. I travel.
[20:41.000 --> 20:42.000]  Okay.
[20:42.000 --> 20:52.000]  But I ended up getting actually accosted and was put in jail for two days without seeing a judge on a suspended license.
[20:52.000 --> 20:53.000]  Okay.
[20:53.000 --> 21:01.000]  And I got out with the courts, had been on with some information, some good knowledge about the law, and the judge threw me out the first 30 days.
[21:01.000 --> 21:07.000]  Came back the next time, the same thing. We got to a gridlock, and he threw me out again for another recess for 30 days.
[21:07.000 --> 21:16.000]  I came back the last month and put an affidavit in, and he and I had a conversation about the law and jurisdiction, et cetera.
[21:16.000 --> 21:19.000]  And it got kind of quiet in the court room.
[21:19.000 --> 21:26.000]  And he told me he's going to grant me the permission to file a dismissal.
[21:26.000 --> 21:33.000]  And I was kind of hesitant to do that because I don't think he actually has the permission to grant me the privilege to file a-
[21:33.000 --> 21:36.000]  Well, no one grants you permission to file a dismissal.
[21:36.000 --> 21:38.000]  Everyone has the right to file a dismissal.
[21:38.000 --> 21:42.000]  It's a challenge to the charge or the jurisdiction of the court.
[21:42.000 --> 21:45.000]  It's not something the judge can grant you leave to do.
[21:45.000 --> 21:48.000]  You have every right to do it.
[21:48.000 --> 21:49.000]  Got it.
[21:49.000 --> 21:55.000]  So he wants to have a private setting where he and I, and I guess the district attorney, to talk about it behind closed doors.
[21:55.000 --> 21:58.000]  Is there any danger in that for me?
[21:58.000 --> 21:59.000]  Absolutely.
[21:59.000 --> 22:00.000]  What should I look out for?
[22:00.000 --> 22:01.000]  Absolutely.
[22:01.000 --> 22:03.000]  Terminology being first and foremost.
[22:03.000 --> 22:05.000]  You start having the same conversation with him.
[22:05.000 --> 22:10.000]  You started off with me tonight, and you may as well write your check out now.
[22:10.000 --> 22:15.000]  Wow.
[22:15.000 --> 22:17.000]  So what do you suggest?
[22:17.000 --> 22:25.000]  I suggest, well, again, what do you think your capabilities are as far as catching what they're doing when they do it?
[22:25.000 --> 22:33.000]  Because I guarantee you they are master craftsmen of language in that room, more so than you're going to be because they make a living at it.
[22:33.000 --> 22:36.000]  Both of them do.
[22:36.000 --> 22:40.000]  So how outmatched do you feel?
[22:40.000 --> 22:43.000]  Actually, this conversation on the radio is actually not how I went into court.
[22:43.000 --> 22:49.000]  I was just kind of calling in the day based on a friend's recommendation to listen, so I kind of got caught off guard.
[22:49.000 --> 22:54.000]  The conversation that we had the first few times was good enough for him to basically put me out of court.
[22:54.000 --> 22:57.000]  Well, I don't know what you mean by put you out of court.
[22:57.000 --> 23:01.000]  Meaning let's take a recess or you come back in 30 days.
[23:01.000 --> 23:02.000]  I can't handle you.
[23:02.000 --> 23:06.000]  We're talking about jurisdiction, and people in the courtroom are listening to you talking about this.
[23:06.000 --> 23:07.000]  Okay.
[23:07.000 --> 23:10.000]  So the very first thing, then here is what you need to make sure you do.
[23:10.000 --> 23:17.000]  If you have this conference with them, you discuss no topics that deal with the merits of the accusations.
[23:17.000 --> 23:21.000]  You deal strictly with the jurisdiction of the court.
[23:21.000 --> 23:28.000]  Now, considering I have no clue how you have gone about attempting to challenge the jurisdiction and on what grounds,
[23:28.000 --> 23:34.000]  I'm kind of advising blindly here as to what you do in regards to that specifically.
[23:34.000 --> 23:45.000]  I don't know because I don't know what you're asserting as your ground for the challenge or how you're asserting lack of jurisdiction.
[23:45.000 --> 23:53.000]  So that's going to be a conversation we're going to need to have by email or something so I can get some more details than I've got.
[23:53.000 --> 23:54.000]  Okay.
[23:54.000 --> 23:55.000]  Eddie, perfect.
[23:55.000 --> 23:56.000]  All right.
[23:56.000 --> 24:04.000]  So in that regard, you can send me an email to eddie, E-D-D-I-E, at ruleoflawradio.com.
[24:04.000 --> 24:08.000]  And I take it from what I see here, you're in Illinois.
[24:08.000 --> 24:09.000]  That's correct.
[24:09.000 --> 24:10.000]  Okay.
[24:10.000 --> 24:16.000]  How much research have you done on proper procedure and types of offenses for traffic citations in Illinois?
[24:16.000 --> 24:20.000]  Are traffic citations civil, criminal, or administrative?
[24:20.000 --> 24:21.000]  They are criminal.
[24:21.000 --> 24:22.000]  They're trying to-
[24:22.000 --> 24:24.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[24:24.000 --> 24:25.000]  Now, see?
[24:25.000 --> 24:27.000]  You didn't understand my question.
[24:27.000 --> 24:31.000]  That right there is what they're going to do to you in that conference.
[24:31.000 --> 24:35.000]  See, you immediately jumped in, it's criminal.
[24:35.000 --> 24:42.000]  The correct response is, well, they appear to be treating it as criminal.
[24:42.000 --> 24:49.000]  But if I had read the statutes, I would understand that it is in actuality administrative.
[24:49.000 --> 24:50.000]  Right.
[24:50.000 --> 24:55.000]  Because nine times out of ten, the state statutes are written so that they are administrative,
[24:55.000 --> 24:58.000]  like for instance here in Texas.
[24:58.000 --> 25:03.000]  If you read the statute, it gives a definition for the term department.
[25:03.000 --> 25:10.000]  And in the Texas Transportation Code, every single chapter contains a reference to the department.
[25:10.000 --> 25:19.000]  And everything it discusses after that is the powers of those that work for that department to do the things that are in that statute.
[25:19.000 --> 25:26.000]  When you look up the department for the definition of it, let's take for instance the enforcement statutes
[25:26.000 --> 25:34.000]  and chapters of the Transportation Code here, the department means the Department of Public Safety of the state of Texas.
[25:34.000 --> 25:39.000]  Well, when you then go to the state administrative code, right there in the administrative code,
[25:39.000 --> 25:43.000]  you are told very quickly the Department of Public Safety is a state administrative agency.
[25:43.000 --> 25:47.000]  They are not law enforcement, period.
[25:47.000 --> 25:52.000]  Therefore, even though they are treating the traffic citations as criminal,
[25:52.000 --> 25:59.000]  the only people that have power to issue them are those that are working under an administrative agency
[25:59.000 --> 26:02.000]  known as the Department of Public Safety of the state of Texas.
[26:02.000 --> 26:07.000]  Thus, their power is administrative.
[26:07.000 --> 26:14.000]  So you see, those are the types of things you need to know better when you have these conversations.
[26:14.000 --> 26:23.000]  Because the moment you presume something, that something is going to come back and bite you right in the behind with steel teeth.
[26:23.000 --> 26:25.000]  Don't need that.
[26:25.000 --> 26:30.000]  Okay, you may as well go sit on a bear trap if you are going to walk in there unprepared.
[26:30.000 --> 26:32.000]  I'll be prepared.
[26:32.000 --> 26:34.000]  Should this be recorded, this private session?
[26:34.000 --> 26:37.000]  Absolutely, but you need to be real careful.
[26:37.000 --> 26:41.000]  I don't know what the recording laws are in Illinois.
[26:41.000 --> 26:45.000]  Now, any state will let you record if everybody knows they're being recorded,
[26:45.000 --> 26:49.000]  but these guys aren't going to let you record them if they know you're doing it.
[26:49.000 --> 26:53.000]  Now, in Texas, recordings are one-party requirement.
[26:53.000 --> 27:02.000]  Only one party, but it must be a party engaged in the conversation, not somebody listening into it.
[27:02.000 --> 27:06.000]  Only one party to the conversation has to know it's being recorded.
[27:06.000 --> 27:09.000]  That's known as a one-party state.
[27:09.000 --> 27:13.000]  You need to know if Illinois is a one-party state.
[27:13.000 --> 27:15.000]  All right, we'll check into that.
[27:15.000 --> 27:16.000]  Okay.
[27:16.000 --> 27:21.000]  If it is, then you can record, and you don't have to tell anybody you're doing it.
[27:21.000 --> 27:22.000]  Excellent.
[27:22.000 --> 27:24.000]  Okay, I will do it.
[27:24.000 --> 27:31.000]  All right, so get me details, specific dates, times, places, agencies, what was said, who was said it,
[27:31.000 --> 27:37.000]  and any actions that were involved in it from beginning to end.
[27:37.000 --> 27:40.000]  Actual, don't embellish, don't colorize.
[27:40.000 --> 27:42.000]  This is not NFL night.
[27:42.000 --> 27:46.000]  I need facts straight up beginning to end.
[27:46.000 --> 27:47.000]  You'll have it.
[27:47.000 --> 27:48.000]  Okay.
[27:48.000 --> 27:52.000]  All right, Troy, thanks for calling in.
[27:52.000 --> 27:56.000]  All right, everybody else that's up there, please, y'all hang on.
[27:56.000 --> 28:01.000]  I did want to go into something real quick with this script, and then I'll promise I will get to your calls.
[28:01.000 --> 28:06.000]  But I've only got a couple of minutes to start this and part of the next segment to get this discussion finished,
[28:06.000 --> 28:07.000]  and then I'll be taking all your calls.
[28:07.000 --> 28:11.000]  So Olivia, Brandon, Truth Raider, Eric, y'all hang on.
[28:11.000 --> 28:13.000]  I'm not going to ignore you or skip over you.
[28:13.000 --> 28:16.000]  Just please stay on the line.
[28:16.000 --> 28:17.000]  Okay.
[28:17.000 --> 28:21.000]  Now, part of what we went over in class this weekend was this script.
[28:21.000 --> 28:28.000]  And what we're going to try to do with it first and foremost in the pretrial process is to get the court to admit that there is no way
[28:28.000 --> 28:33.000]  that you are going to get a fair and impartial trial in this court, absolutely no way under the sun,
[28:33.000 --> 28:38.000]  and that they will be party to preventing that.
[28:38.000 --> 28:45.000]  And we have to craft these questions very carefully to get that fact on the record and in the open as quickly as possible
[28:45.000 --> 28:50.000]  before that judge realizes what you're doing to him.
[28:50.000 --> 28:56.000]  So real quick, I'm going to start on these, but I expect to get interrupted here in about 30 seconds to have to take a break.
[28:56.000 --> 28:57.000]  All right.
[28:57.000 --> 29:03.000]  We walk into court, any time we walk into court, this is the first thing out of your mouth.
[29:03.000 --> 29:10.000]  I am here by special appearance to challenge the jurisdiction of this court, and I move that all proceedings be on the record.
[29:10.000 --> 29:16.000]  Judge, there are specific matters relating to jurisdiction, the rights of the accused, specific to due process,
[29:16.000 --> 29:20.000]  and the right of the accused for a fair and impartial trial that need to be addressed.
[29:20.000 --> 29:24.000]  Now, in that first part up there that I've got, that all proceedings be on the record,
[29:24.000 --> 29:28.000]  I've made some changes to that, which obviously isn't in this version I'm looking at,
[29:28.000 --> 29:32.000]  but it specifically also states that if this is not a court of record,
[29:32.000 --> 29:36.000]  I move that the judge make a handwritten entry as to my special appearance
[29:36.000 --> 29:41.000]  and my challenge to the jurisdiction of the court for the purpose of preserving the record.
[29:41.000 --> 29:46.000]  The judge can make handwritten notes in that record on your behalf if you move the court to do it.
[29:46.000 --> 29:48.000]  So make sure you do that.
[29:48.000 --> 29:52.000]  All right, folks, we're going to take a quick break, and I'm going to get into the rest of this when we get back.
[29:52.000 --> 29:54.000]  So y'all hang on.
[29:54.000 --> 29:57.000]  512-646-1984 is the call-in number if you want to get in line.
[29:57.000 --> 30:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[30:00.000 --> 30:10.000]  In a South African game park, a rhinoceros died during an operation to embed a remotely readable tracking microchip in its horn.
[30:10.000 --> 30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll have details on the tragic death of Spencer the Rhino next.
[30:16.000 --> 30:22.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[30:35.000 --> 30:42.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.000 --> 30:50.000]  Africa has a real problem with poachers who hunt endangered animals for ivory and meat.
[30:50.000 --> 30:57.000]  To stop the slaughter, they've tried various countermeasures, including locator microchips to track the animal's movements.
[30:57.000 --> 31:05.000]  But a game park in South Africa made the wrong decision when they tried to embed a microchip into the horn of a rhino named Spencer.
[31:05.000 --> 31:12.000]  To perform the procedure, veterinarians injected him with sedatives, inserted the chip, and tried to wake him up with stimulants.
[31:12.000 --> 31:15.000]  The combination tragically resulted in the animal's death.
[31:15.000 --> 31:22.000]  It was a painful reminder that drugging and chipping living creatures can be dangerous, and sometimes deadly.
[31:22.000 --> 31:27.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.000 --> 31:35.000]  What are you thinking? Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics?
[31:35.000 --> 31:38.000]  Or a total body detox for around $10 a month?
[31:38.000 --> 31:49.000]  Infusa.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidney, liver, blood, lung, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever.
[31:49.000 --> 31:53.000]  It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products.
[31:53.000 --> 31:55.000]  That saves you space, time, and money.
[31:55.000 --> 32:01.000]  Call 888-910-4367 only at infusa.org.
[32:01.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:13.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:20.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:26.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:36.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the Rule of Law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:51.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 33:00.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:00.000 --> 33:12.000]  Live Free Speech Radio, logosradionetwork.com
[33:12.000 --> 33:28.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm gonna solve them, to the government them, prosecute them. Okay.
[33:28.000 --> 33:50.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. All right, everybody, y'all hang on. I will be with you in just a second.
[33:50.000 --> 34:08.000]  Okay. Now, let me begin going through this specific things that we want to ask the judge. Judge, there are some specific matters relating to jurisdiction, the rights of the accused, specific to due process, and the right of the accused to a fair and impartial trial that need to be addressed.
[34:08.000 --> 34:17.000]  Now, the problem here is going to be getting this individual to admit you're not getting that.
[34:17.000 --> 34:22.000]  So, we're going to have to trick them with the questions that we're asking into getting them.
[34:22.000 --> 34:28.000]  And so, the question becomes, what questions are they? Well, here we go.
[34:28.000 --> 34:37.000]  First, I believe that this court now, what we're going to do is we're going to state for the record what we believe is going to happen.
[34:37.000 --> 34:47.000]  We're going to try to motivate the judge to want to defend his court as being a place where these things don't happen.
[34:47.000 --> 34:53.000]  Now, of course, the judge can also pretty much decide that he just wants to be mad about it and take it out on you or try to.
[34:53.000 --> 35:05.000]  But at the same time, it's very important that we let the record reflect that we do not expect to be treated fairly and impartially in this court.
[35:05.000 --> 35:10.000]  So, for my purposes, this is the way I would intend to do it.
[35:10.000 --> 35:18.000]  First, I believe that this court operates entirely for the purposes of unlawful taxation through fraud and excess municipal or county revenue generation,
[35:18.000 --> 35:22.000]  and not for seeking or providing justice to those that appear before it.
[35:22.000 --> 35:31.000]  Addressing the due process issues that I am about to bring forth is your opportunity to prove me wrong, and I pray that you will use it accordingly.
[35:31.000 --> 35:36.000]  Second, I do not believe that I can or will receive a fair and impartial trial in this court,
[35:36.000 --> 35:44.000]  as I believe that this court will do as it pleases despite the law, the rules of procedure, and the complete lack of factual evidence in this case,
[35:44.000 --> 35:52.000]  and that it will do so by conducting a completely biased and prejudicial proceeding in collusion with and aiding the prosecution to secure a conviction
[35:52.000 --> 35:59.000]  based entirely upon legal presumptions rather than factual evidence proving every element of the alleged offense.
[35:59.000 --> 36:06.000]  Therefore, if the court would be so kind as to help me get past these concerns by addressing some due process violations
[36:06.000 --> 36:12.000]  that I perceive as having had or will imminently occur, it will be greatly appreciated.
[36:12.000 --> 36:17.000]  This is where we get the court wanting to defend themselves at this point.
[36:17.000 --> 36:19.000]  All right.
[36:19.000 --> 36:25.000]  To start, I would ask the court to take judicial notice of Article 1.05 Code of Criminal Procedure,
[36:25.000 --> 36:29.000]  and it states that the accused has the right to know the nature and cause against him or her,
[36:29.000 --> 36:33.000]  and presumably the right to properly understand both.
[36:33.000 --> 36:38.000]  Is that correct?
[36:38.000 --> 36:45.000]  Then we say, does this court or do you personally, while acting in your official capacity as judge
[36:45.000 --> 36:48.000]  and prior to the presentment of factual evidence,
[36:48.000 --> 36:57.000]  presume or believe that the statutes within the transportation code automatically apply to the accused?
[36:57.000 --> 37:02.000]  Now, that is an entrapment question for obvious reasons.
[37:02.000 --> 37:05.000]  And here is where we're going to start discussion of this.
[37:05.000 --> 37:06.000]  Okay.
[37:06.000 --> 37:08.000]  But one more thing, and I'll get into that.
[37:08.000 --> 37:14.000]  Does this court or do you personally, while acting in your official capacity as judge,
[37:14.000 --> 37:19.000]  intend to allow the prosecution to automatically presume the accused guilty
[37:19.000 --> 37:23.000]  of any of the elements required to be proven?
[37:23.000 --> 37:25.000]  Now, of course, we can get a yes or no answer to that.
[37:25.000 --> 37:28.000]  Let's see what happens if we get a yes.
[37:28.000 --> 37:34.000]  If we do, we say, and do you intend to allow the prosecution to simply presume guilt
[37:34.000 --> 37:36.000]  of a necessary element of a criminal charge,
[37:36.000 --> 37:42.000]  specifically the applicability of the transportation code and the statutes therein?
[37:42.000 --> 37:45.000]  Again, if we get a yes, and do you intend to do so
[37:45.000 --> 37:50.000]  without presentment of any factual evidence supporting that presumption?
[37:50.000 --> 37:54.000]  If we get a no to the original question,
[37:54.000 --> 37:58.000]  so the prosecutor is required to prove every single element,
[37:58.000 --> 38:03.000]  including applicability of the statute to the accused.
[38:03.000 --> 38:05.000]  If he says yes, well, then we go on.
[38:05.000 --> 38:08.000]  If, however, we get a no.
[38:08.000 --> 38:13.000]  Okay, so you do intend to allow the prosecutor to presume guilt
[38:13.000 --> 38:19.000]  and to convict based upon personal presumptions of law rather than factual evidence.
[38:19.000 --> 38:22.000]  Thank you for clarifying.
[38:22.000 --> 38:28.000]  I ask the court to take judicial notice of Articles 11.43 and 38.03 Code of Criminal Procedure,
[38:28.000 --> 38:34.000]  which states that anyone accused of any alleged crime has the right to be presumed
[38:34.000 --> 38:39.000]  completely innocent of all elements of a charge until actually proven guilty.
[38:39.000 --> 38:44.000]  That would include me, is that correct?
[38:44.000 --> 38:47.000]  I further ask the court to take judicial notice of another provision
[38:47.000 --> 38:50.000]  within Article 38.03 Code of Criminal Procedure,
[38:50.000 --> 38:55.000]  which states no person may be convicted of an offense
[38:55.000 --> 39:01.000]  unless each element of the offense is proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
[39:01.000 --> 39:11.000]  And which provision I believe and assert would directly apply to this alleged matter, is that correct?
[39:11.000 --> 39:15.000]  In relation to jurisdiction specifically, at a minimum,
[39:15.000 --> 39:22.000]  this court must have jurisdiction of the subject matter of the individual and the venue, is that correct?
[39:22.000 --> 39:26.000]  In relation to jurisdiction specifically, at a minimum,
[39:26.000 --> 39:30.000]  state must have standing to bring the charges and pursue an action.
[39:30.000 --> 39:35.000]  And once it has been challenged, state must prove its standing on the record.
[39:35.000 --> 39:41.000]  Are those assertions of standing in relation to proper court procedure factually correct?
[39:41.000 --> 39:47.000]  I believe it to be true that anyone accused of any crime has the right to a fair and impartial trial,
[39:47.000 --> 39:50.000]  including me, is that correct?
[39:50.000 --> 39:59.000]  And I believe it to be true that this same right also includes the right to a fair and impartial judge, is that correct?
[39:59.000 --> 40:04.000]  Now, if we get to this point, and I seriously doubt we will get past number six up there
[40:04.000 --> 40:08.000]  where we first ask the judge if they intend to presume guilt of any element of the charge
[40:08.000 --> 40:11.000]  prior to the introduction of factual evidence,
[40:11.000 --> 40:17.000]  I believe that's where the court's going to depart from answering any questions and insist to move forward without it,
[40:17.000 --> 40:24.000]  in which case we're going to document that as a direct denial of due process for failure of the court
[40:24.000 --> 40:30.000]  to be fair and impartial and to protect the right of the accused to know the nature and cause against them
[40:30.000 --> 40:40.000]  pursuant Article 1, Section 10, and Article 1.05 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[40:40.000 --> 40:50.000]  These people do not follow the rules of procedure that are supposed to bind them like they are claiming these other statutes bind the rest of us.
[40:50.000 --> 40:57.000]  But they are going to try that, and we have got to be willing to fight them tooth and nail when they do it.
[40:57.000 --> 41:02.000]  Now, since I doubt we will get as far as I went, and this is not even by far complete,
[41:02.000 --> 41:08.000]  but as far as I got in that, real quick I want to go over a couple things dealing with the jury voir dire.
[41:08.000 --> 41:12.000]  We're going to attempt to do the same thing with the jury.
[41:12.000 --> 41:23.000]  Now, we've discussed before questions you can ask to try to trap the entire jury pool into getting disqualified because of certain things.
[41:23.000 --> 41:31.000]  Well, the judges have just decided to declare that they don't see the juror's response as a reason to disqualify,
[41:31.000 --> 41:38.000]  even if the juror has already said that they would show prejudice to the officer's testimony over that of the accused.
[41:38.000 --> 41:53.000]  So now what we want to do is get the juror to admit that they already have presumed you guilty of this same specific element that the court is presuming you guilty of,
[41:53.000 --> 42:00.000]  which is application of the statute to a non-commercial traveler rather than a commercial driver.
[42:00.000 --> 42:11.000]  If the jury member that you're questioning admits that they already believe and presume that that statute applies to everyone, including you,
[42:11.000 --> 42:22.000]  then they have already got a predisposition of guilt over innocence on that element, and you are not getting a fair and impartial jury if that is the case.
[42:22.000 --> 42:30.000]  So we're going to try to formulate a question that allows us to prove that through the jury member themselves.
[42:30.000 --> 42:34.000]  So here's what I've put together on that so far.
[42:34.000 --> 42:42.000]  Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, do any of you already believe that the accused in this matter, and that would be me,
[42:42.000 --> 42:51.000]  is already guilty of even one of the required elements of the charge or charges alleged by the prosecution?
[42:51.000 --> 42:57.000]  Now, of course, with that question, most of the jurors are going to say, no, I'm not presuming you guilty of anything.
[42:57.000 --> 43:05.000]  But we're using this to set them into a frame of mind where we're going to be able to get them to contradict themselves.
[43:05.000 --> 43:16.000]  The prosecutor is alleging that the accused, once again, that would be me, is guilty of one or more violations of the Texas Transportation Code.
[43:16.000 --> 43:19.000]  Now, this part I expect to draw an objection.
[43:19.000 --> 43:25.000]  That is the code in Texas that regulates a specific commercial use activity known as transportation.
[43:25.000 --> 43:31.000]  Now, even if the prosecutor objects, we don't care.
[43:31.000 --> 43:35.000]  That statement is now in the record if it's a court of record.
[43:35.000 --> 43:39.000]  And during voir dire, the judge can't go back and say strike that.
[43:39.000 --> 43:42.000]  The judge can only say, well, ignore that and go on.
[43:42.000 --> 43:44.000]  You can't ask that question.
[43:44.000 --> 43:49.000]  But even if that happens, we can continue on from there, and I've tried to formulate these to let us do that.
[43:49.000 --> 43:52.000]  All right, folks, I should be able to wrap this up on the other side and start taking your calls.
[43:52.000 --> 43:54.000]  So everybody, please hang on the board.
[43:54.000 --> 43:57.000]  I will be with you very, very shortly on the other side of this break.
[43:57.000 --> 44:01.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:01.000 --> 44:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.000 --> 44:09.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand,
[44:09.000 --> 44:15.000]  four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:39.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.000 --> 44:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 45:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:07.000]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com,
[45:07.000 --> 45:12.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D,
[45:12.000 --> 45:15.000]  here in Austin, Texas, hiring brave new books and chase things
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:27.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil,
[45:27.000 --> 45:31.000]  lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:38.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:48.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.000 --> 46:15.000]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:15.000 --> 46:31.000]  All right, folks.
[46:31.000 --> 46:32.000]  We are back.
[46:32.000 --> 46:33.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:33.000 --> 46:34.000]  All right.
[46:34.000 --> 46:39.000]  Let me get to this next question here real quick.
[46:39.000 --> 46:40.000]  All right.
[46:40.000 --> 46:45.000]  And if we get an objection to that second question, we proceed with this.
[46:45.000 --> 46:49.000]  What I need to know from each of you is, at this very moment,
[46:49.000 --> 46:55.000]  do you already presume that the transportation code automatically applies to everyone,
[46:55.000 --> 47:02.000]  including the accused, despite no presentation of factual evidence by the prosecution,
[47:02.000 --> 47:07.000]  proving that as a fact beyond a reasonable doubt?
[47:07.000 --> 47:12.000]  Now, we go to juror number one.
[47:12.000 --> 47:16.000]  Juror number one, do you understand that the prosecution absolutely must prove
[47:16.000 --> 47:21.000]  every required element of each and every offense?
[47:21.000 --> 47:23.000]  Now, of course, they may say yes, they may say no,
[47:23.000 --> 47:26.000]  they may say they don't know what an element is.
[47:26.000 --> 47:27.000]  Okay?
[47:27.000 --> 47:33.000]  So we can ask them, do you understand what a required element of an offense is?
[47:33.000 --> 47:36.000]  And they can say yes or no.
[47:36.000 --> 47:44.000]  So then you can simply say, okay, some charges have a couple of elements.
[47:44.000 --> 47:49.000]  For instance, they have to name a date and a place.
[47:49.000 --> 47:55.000]  But they also would have more in some cases where they have to name a date,
[47:55.000 --> 48:02.000]  a place, specific actions, and whether or not there was intent or no intent,
[48:02.000 --> 48:06.000]  or if intent in fact is one of the necessary elements.
[48:06.000 --> 48:14.000]  So each thing that the statute says is a requirement in order to commit the offense
[48:14.000 --> 48:20.000]  is an element that the prosecutor must prove.
[48:20.000 --> 48:22.000]  And he has to prove them all.
[48:22.000 --> 48:25.000]  He cannot prove one out of five.
[48:25.000 --> 48:28.000]  He can't prove four out of five.
[48:28.000 --> 48:31.000]  He has to prove all five.
[48:31.000 --> 48:38.000]  If he cannot produce factual evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to each
[48:38.000 --> 48:43.000]  and every element, then you have to find the person innocent of that charge
[48:43.000 --> 48:48.000]  or they have to dismiss it because they didn't prove the charge.
[48:48.000 --> 48:51.000]  So now do you understand what an element is?
[48:51.000 --> 48:52.000]  All right.
[48:52.000 --> 48:55.000]  After you get to that explanation, we can go a little further down
[48:55.000 --> 49:02.000]  and we can say, okay, juror number one, at this moment, do you already presume
[49:02.000 --> 49:08.000]  that the transportation code automatically applies to the accused
[49:08.000 --> 49:14.000]  despite having neither seen nor heard any factual evidence proving
[49:14.000 --> 49:18.000]  that the accused was engaged in transportation?
[49:18.000 --> 49:21.000]  Now, of course, you're not going to be able to address the things
[49:21.000 --> 49:24.000]  that the prosecutor is going to attempt to use for that, which is,
[49:24.000 --> 49:28.000]  well, was he driving a motor vehicle at the time when you encountered him?
[49:28.000 --> 49:30.000]  What color was his motor vehicle?
[49:30.000 --> 49:32.000]  And so on and so forth.
[49:32.000 --> 49:37.000]  Because again, they're not introducing any evidence that you were driving
[49:37.000 --> 49:42.000]  a motor vehicle for the purpose of engaging in transportation,
[49:42.000 --> 49:46.000]  which is the highest point they have to prove to even have standing.
[49:46.000 --> 49:50.000]  If you weren't engaged in transportation, you could not be doing any of the
[49:50.000 --> 49:52.000]  things down here that they're accusing you of.
[49:52.000 --> 49:55.000]  End of story.
[49:55.000 --> 49:58.000]  Now, this is where the judge is going to try to create a loophole
[49:58.000 --> 50:02.000]  for the prosecutor to maintain suit and keep you in court.
[50:02.000 --> 50:06.000]  So you've got to be aware of that.
[50:06.000 --> 50:11.000]  Now, juror number one, would you be likely and willing to find the accused
[50:11.000 --> 50:16.000]  guilty of any charge even if the prosecutor failed to prove on the record,
[50:16.000 --> 50:21.000]  beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused was engaged in transportation
[50:21.000 --> 50:25.000]  at the time of the alleged offense?
[50:25.000 --> 50:29.000]  Juror number one, would you be likely and willing to find the accused
[50:29.000 --> 50:35.000]  guilty of any charge even if the prosecutor failed to prove on the record
[50:35.000 --> 50:40.000]  that the transportation statutes in that code applied to the accused
[50:40.000 --> 50:42.000]  at the time of the alleged offense?
[50:42.000 --> 50:45.000]  And as we construct more questions, you're going to see that they're
[50:45.000 --> 50:49.000]  directed to get the same answer over and over again, that yes,
[50:49.000 --> 50:56.000]  the jury is willing to allow the prosecutor to assume or presume that
[50:56.000 --> 51:01.000]  that particular element is a done deal, that they are not willing to
[51:01.000 --> 51:08.000]  consider the fact that you are indeed innocent of the statute applying.
[51:08.000 --> 51:11.000]  So you see where that can take you?
[51:11.000 --> 51:16.000]  You can't get a fair trial in these courts because the jury is already
[51:16.000 --> 51:20.000]  presuming you guilty of one of the required elements,
[51:20.000 --> 51:29.000]  and it is the foundational element of everything else state has to prove.
[51:29.000 --> 51:34.000]  He's getting a free pass on proving that one.
[51:34.000 --> 51:40.000]  And that is the one upon which everything else rests.
[51:40.000 --> 51:45.000]  It's exactly why you do not get a fair trial.
[51:45.000 --> 51:46.000]  All right.
[51:46.000 --> 51:49.000]  I hope I didn't complicate that too much and that it made sense to folks,
[51:49.000 --> 51:52.000]  at least to the point where you can see where I'm trying to get to with it
[51:52.000 --> 51:54.000]  and how much work it's going to take.
[51:54.000 --> 51:55.000]  All right.
[51:55.000 --> 51:57.000]  That being said, we're going to start taking our callers,
[51:57.000 --> 51:59.000]  and it looks like Olivia disappeared and came back,
[51:59.000 --> 52:04.000]  but we're going to start with her anyway because she was first.
[52:04.000 --> 52:07.000]  Go ahead, Olivia.
[52:07.000 --> 52:08.000]  Hey, Addy.
[52:08.000 --> 52:09.000]  How you doing?
[52:09.000 --> 52:10.000]  I'm doing good.
[52:10.000 --> 52:11.000]  How are you?
[52:11.000 --> 52:12.000]  I'm doing well.
[52:12.000 --> 52:14.000]  I just have a quick question for you.
[52:14.000 --> 52:22.000]  I would like to know if I have any personal recourse in regards to being
[52:22.000 --> 52:31.000]  accosted by some armed security guards who work for the corporations
[52:31.000 --> 52:39.000]  that's styled as a government in Maryland when my private vehicle
[52:39.000 --> 52:43.000]  is located on private property.
[52:43.000 --> 52:45.000]  I'm sorry, your private what?
[52:45.000 --> 52:54.000]  My private car, my private domicile is accosted for money
[52:54.000 --> 52:59.000]  by the corporate security guard.
[52:59.000 --> 53:00.000]  Okay.
[53:00.000 --> 53:04.000]  Explain to me the situation, Olivia.
[53:04.000 --> 53:07.000]  I'm assuming from what you're telling me so far, you had a car,
[53:07.000 --> 53:11.000]  it was parked on someone's private property, yours or someone else's,
[53:11.000 --> 53:15.000]  and some municipal police officer has done something.
[53:15.000 --> 53:19.000]  What's the something?
[53:19.000 --> 53:25.000]  He has accosted my car.
[53:25.000 --> 53:31.000]  He stood there and held a vigorous and aggressive conversation with your car?
[53:31.000 --> 53:33.000]  Because that's what accosted means.
[53:33.000 --> 53:41.000]  He saw me turning off the ignition and open up the door.
[53:41.000 --> 53:42.000]  Okay.
[53:42.000 --> 53:44.000]  So he saw you getting out of the car.
[53:44.000 --> 53:55.000]  He made presumption because there were no state identifying plates on my private car.
[53:55.000 --> 53:56.000]  Okay.
[53:56.000 --> 54:05.000]  As a result, I was demanded to pay because my private car was towed
[54:05.000 --> 54:13.000]  on a municipal violation and the state, well, I won't say the state.
[54:13.000 --> 54:14.000]  Okay.
[54:14.000 --> 54:18.000]  What is the municipal violation specifically?
[54:18.000 --> 54:23.000]  My private car is not registered with the state.
[54:23.000 --> 54:24.000]  Okay.
[54:24.000 --> 54:28.000]  But again, the charge has to do, from what you're describing,
[54:28.000 --> 54:32.000]  the charge has to be something relating to the fact that the state of Maryland
[54:32.000 --> 54:36.000]  is trying to say that you cannot have, even on your own private property,
[54:36.000 --> 54:40.000]  a car that isn't registered somewhere.
[54:40.000 --> 54:41.000]  Exactly.
[54:41.000 --> 54:45.000]  So is that what the statute that you're being charged with says?
[54:45.000 --> 54:46.000]  Yes.
[54:46.000 --> 54:49.000]  Okay.
[54:49.000 --> 54:51.000]  Go on.
[54:51.000 --> 54:57.000]  As a result, to maintain the possession of my own private car,
[54:57.000 --> 55:05.000]  I had to pay the county that this infraction occurred in, like $40,
[55:05.000 --> 55:10.000]  and the tow truck company, $250.
[55:10.000 --> 55:17.000]  So this whole situation resulted in me being extorted out of $290.
[55:17.000 --> 55:21.000]  At this point, do I have any recourse?
[55:21.000 --> 55:24.000]  Well, again, sure you do.
[55:24.000 --> 55:28.000]  I mean, the officer had no warrant to seize private property.
[55:28.000 --> 55:35.000]  The officer did not seize the car as evidence associated with a criminal act.
[55:35.000 --> 55:38.000]  He didn't do it for any of those reasons.
[55:38.000 --> 55:41.000]  That makes it armed robbery.
[55:41.000 --> 55:43.000]  Okay?
[55:43.000 --> 55:44.000]  Okay.
[55:44.000 --> 55:49.000]  Now, the other issue here is I don't know what terminology
[55:49.000 --> 55:53.000]  or discussion or anything like that that ensued
[55:53.000 --> 55:57.000]  and what any recording of any of that, if any, exists
[55:57.000 --> 56:02.000]  would prove one way or the other for you or against you.
[56:02.000 --> 56:07.000]  So you need to get a copy of that by either public information request
[56:07.000 --> 56:11.000]  or through file discovery or something of that nature.
[56:11.000 --> 56:15.000]  But yeah, you have a federal lawsuit as long as you did not blow the claim
[56:15.000 --> 56:20.000]  of not being engaged in a regulable activity over which they had authority.
[56:20.000 --> 56:25.000]  If you started slinging around the same terminology you started off with with me,
[56:25.000 --> 56:28.000]  then you may have blown that opportunity.
[56:28.000 --> 56:32.000]  Folks, and Olivia, not just you, but everybody listening,
[56:32.000 --> 56:35.000]  just like Tyler on that first call,
[56:35.000 --> 56:40.000]  you better get a grip on your vocabulary and its usage.
[56:40.000 --> 56:46.000]  When you do not distinguish your use of a term or phrase from theirs
[56:46.000 --> 56:50.000]  and you're conversing with them, any of them,
[56:50.000 --> 56:55.000]  on a subject matter dealing with something they're accusing you of,
[56:55.000 --> 57:05.000]  the presumption will always be in their favor that your usage was their usage.
[57:05.000 --> 57:08.000]  So check your speech.
[57:08.000 --> 57:13.000]  Think before you use any of those terms.
[57:13.000 --> 57:14.000]  Okay?
[57:14.000 --> 57:22.000]  So without that information, Olivia, I don't know how far you will get.
[57:22.000 --> 57:27.000]  But yeah, you have recourse if you protected everything properly
[57:27.000 --> 57:31.000]  because the officer hadn't proven anything.
[57:31.000 --> 57:38.000]  He did not seize the car for a legitimate purpose such as even civil asset forfeiture.
[57:38.000 --> 57:43.000]  He seized it out of spite and retribution, not because it was evidence,
[57:43.000 --> 57:49.000]  not because it was a weapon or anything that had been used to perpetrate a crime
[57:49.000 --> 57:53.000]  that he could firsthand admit he saw happen.
[57:53.000 --> 57:55.000]  And see, here's the other problem.
[57:55.000 --> 57:59.000]  If he didn't actually see a crime committed in his presence or view,
[57:59.000 --> 58:04.000]  like he's required to do here in Texas, and he issued a citation and took the car,
[58:04.000 --> 58:09.000]  he has an even bigger problem because he acted entirely of his own volition
[58:09.000 --> 58:15.000]  and not under the protection of any law associated with the duties of his office.
[58:15.000 --> 58:17.000]  Okay, well, I'll get in touch with you, Abby,
[58:17.000 --> 58:23.000]  because those elements are definitely, definitely in place with this situation.
[58:23.000 --> 58:26.000]  Okay, well, Olivia, just be aware now.
[58:26.000 --> 58:29.000]  I have to charge for my time if we go that route, okay?
[58:29.000 --> 58:31.000]  And I want everybody to know that.
[58:31.000 --> 58:33.000]  I spend too much time doing this stuff for free.
[58:33.000 --> 58:36.000]  I try to be cheap, but I can't be completely easy, okay?
[58:36.000 --> 58:40.000]  I understand. I just like to move viewpoints.
[58:40.000 --> 58:44.000]  All right. Well, you hang in there, and if that's all, I'll catch you.
[58:44.000 --> 58:46.000]  I'll get the next caller when we come back, okay?
[58:46.000 --> 58:49.000]  We'll be right back, folks.
[58:49.000 --> 58:53.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:53.000 --> 58:58.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:01.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.000 --> 59:25.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word
[59:25.000 --> 59:28.000]  beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:32.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version
[59:32.000 --> 59:34.000]  simply for the asking.
[59:34.000 --> 59:37.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours
[59:37.000 --> 59:44.000]  just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 59:54.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[59:54.000 --> 59:57.000]  logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:03.000 --> 01:00:07.000]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates,
[01:00:07.000 --> 01:00:09.000]  online at thelibertybeat.com.
[01:00:09.000 --> 01:00:13.000]  I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, May 12, 2014.
[01:00:13.000 --> 01:00:16.000]  Gold opened today at $1,302,
[01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:18.000]  silver opened at $19.58,
[01:00:18.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  and Bitcoin is trading at $439.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:25.000]  Support for the Liberty Beat comes from GrowYourOwnGroceries.org,
[01:00:25.000 --> 01:00:27.000]  now offering an eight-week course
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:30.000]  where you can learn how to treat the most common family ailments
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:33.000]  with simple medicines that you can grow or easily find.
[01:00:33.000 --> 01:00:36.000]  Learn more at GrowYourOwnGroceries.org.
[01:00:36.000 --> 01:00:38.000]  And support comes from Bitmain Tech,
[01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:41.000]  creators of the newly released Antminer S2 Bitcoin Miner,
[01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:44.000]  one tera hash and only 1,000 watts.
[01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:47.000]  Order yours online today at bitmaintech.com
[01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  or call them up, 844-BITMAIN.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:53.000]  That's 844-248-6246.
[01:00:53.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  In the news, on Tuesday, May 5,
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:00:59.000]  representatives from fluoride-free San Marcos rallied at City Hall
[01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:02.000]  to ask the Mayor and City Council to approve a resolution
[01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:05.000]  to end water fluoridation in the City of San Marcos.
[01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:07.000]  John Bush, founder of the Liberty Beat,
[01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  and Catherine Bleich of Sovereign Living spoke in favor of ending fluoridation.
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:16.000]  San Marcos Mayor Daniel Guerrero remained open to the topic
[01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:19.000]  and requested more information.
[01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:23.000]  High risk for water contamination and other environmental damage.
[01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:26.000]  That's what a Government Accountability Office report reveals
[01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  about thousands of oil and gas wells the government has failed to inspect.
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:34.000]  The Associated Press reports the findings highlight substantial gaps in oversight
[01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:39.000]  by the agency that manages oil and gas development on federal and Indian lands.
[01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:42.000]  Additionally, the agency's audit states the Bureau of Land Management
[01:01:42.000 --> 01:01:46.000]  failed to effectively coordinate with state regulators in New Mexico,
[01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Utah.
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:55.000]  The Waluna Martu First Nation of Western Australia is engaged in a fight
[01:01:55.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  against the possible expansion of a uranium mining project.
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:03.000]  Indigenous rights activists and anti-nuclear groups have accused Toro Energy
[01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  of promoting junk science regarding the safety of the project.
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:10.000]  The group fears the mines are dangerous to human health and the environment.
[01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:14.000]  Waluna elder Glenn Cook called it the duty of those who care about the Earth
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  and people to resist the project.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:19.000]  The mine is scheduled to be operational within the next year.
[01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  Support for Liberty Beat comes from Affordable Sound, CD and DVD duplication,
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  along with posters and promotions materials.
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  Mention promo code LIBERTY and when you order 10 or more posters, you get 10 free.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:37.000]  Online at AffordableSound.com or call them up, 512-459-5253.
[01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:43.000]  And support comes from Voice and Exit, maximizing human flourishing through radical innovation.
[01:02:43.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  Tickets on sale now. Get 10% off with promo code FREEDOM, June 21 at Austin Music Hall.
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:52.000]  Get yours at VoiceAndExit.com.
[01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:57.000]  This is the Liberty Beat for Monday, May 12, 2014.
[01:02:57.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  Check out the website at thelibertybeat.com.
[01:03:00.000 --> 01:03:12.000]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty.
[01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:14.000]  I read his book and he said,
[01:03:14.000 --> 01:03:19.000]  He cares not for the unsightly.
[01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:27.000]  These warm-hearted come by that term rightly.
[01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:33.000]  Hi folks, we are back and we are going to go to Brandon in Texas.
[01:03:33.000 --> 01:03:35.000]  Brandon, what can we do for you?
[01:03:35.000 --> 01:03:37.000]  Hey Eddie, how are you doing this evening?
[01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:39.000]  Ah, so far so grand. What's up?
[01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:45.000]  All right. I have a couple questions about getting the judge disqualified.
[01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:46.000]  Okay.
[01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:47.000]  Or recuse herself in another one.
[01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:54.000]  Basically, like I said before, I'm up in county now and I had my initial appearance this last week.
[01:03:54.000 --> 01:03:59.000]  It would have been great, you know, to have the information you've been discussing so far on the show,
[01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  but, you know, I'm still working towards it.
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  Anyway, I got the poking around and I got the judge's name and obviously the prosecuting attorney's name.
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:12.000]  And, you know, I go on Facebook and I look up and I see that they're friends.
[01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  Would this be a point to request that the judge disqualify himself?
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:24.000]  Absolutely. The judge is not allowed to have a relationship with any of the parties to the case where they are presiding.
[01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  Outstanding. Cool. Okay, I'm going to get that one right there in motion.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  All right, second question.
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:35.000]  Now, be aware that this may not, the judge may do an in-run around you and say,
[01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  well, that's okay, they have different prosecutors, I'll just send a new one.
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  Okay.
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:48.000]  What you need to do is get the judge to do something that would personally disqualify the judge.
[01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:57.000]  Because depending upon who is acting as the prosecutor, there may be more than one person in that pool to draw from.
[01:04:57.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  And that's a simple fix.
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  So you need to get the judge to make it personal.
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  Once they make it personal, there ain't no pushing that off on somebody else.
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:11.000]  You mean making it personal isn't their bias against me?
[01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:12.000]  Correct.
[01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:13.000]  Okay.
[01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:16.000]  And that's where that question that I asked the judge directly,
[01:05:16.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  do you intend to presume that any element of this charge made against the accused that they're already guilty of it?
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:33.000]  If that's the case, the judge has made it personal and it's absolutely impossible to get a fair and impartial trial from that judge.
[01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  Okay. All right, I understand that.
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  Because the Code of Criminal Procedure here in Texas, 38.03 and the 11 point, whatever I read, I forget what it is,
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  makes it very, very clear that they cannot presume guilt over innocence.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:50.000]  And yet 99% of the statutes in the transportation code do exactly that.
[01:05:50.000 --> 01:05:58.000]  And they try to do it under the cover of, let's see, implied consent.
[01:05:58.000 --> 01:06:03.000]  Consenting to the driver's licenses and license plates and all that good stuff.
[01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:04.000]  Exactly.
[01:06:04.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  And the problem that they seem to not understand about implied consent is that once you contest that it's implied, it's no longer implied.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:21.000]  Once you say, I don't grant it, it's not implied anymore.
[01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:25.000]  Right.
[01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  And they seem to think that that means that you can't say that.
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:32.000]  Boy, you got the license, therefore it's implied.
[01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:38.000]  It was never disclosed to me that I'd be waiving any rights, therefore it is not implied and I don't waive it.
[01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  Right, exactly.
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:47.000]  See, that's the part they're forgetting, non-disclosure.
[01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:48.000]  All right.
[01:06:48.000 --> 01:06:50.000]  All right, cool.
[01:06:50.000 --> 01:07:02.000]  Second question, when I went to file my motions, I went to file my motion, Declination to Plea and Special Appearance, I go down to the clerk's office
[01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:12.000]  and they said that I would need to, I mean, this isn't really big, it's just me nitpicking, but they said that I would need to file two separate documents
[01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  because I have two cases before the court that are obviously from the same stop.
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  They asked the court to consolidate the cases.
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:28.000]  That way you can just put the citation numbers for both on the same pleadings and file them in each and file one copy in the case.
[01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:29.000]  All right, good.
[01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:32.000]  Yeah, because that was money on notaries and so on.
[01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:34.000]  So I just have to file a motion.
[01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:39.000]  File a written motion moving the court to consolidate the two citations into a single case.
[01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  Okay.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  And then also something that was interesting, the clerks told me, and it's kind of good on them, but at the same time,
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:52.000]  I just haven't seen the whole muster, they said that if I didn't request a hearing on anything that I put in the record,
[01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:54.000]  that it wasn't even going to be looked at.
[01:07:54.000 --> 01:07:57.000]  It will sit there, but it's not going to be even...
[01:07:57.000 --> 01:08:00.000]  And that is true.
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:05.000]  That's exactly why any time you file something, you should be requesting a hearing on it.
[01:08:05.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  Okay.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:13.000]  And you have to set that up through the clerk of the court or whoever is in charge of the judge's docket.
[01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  Okay.
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:20.000]  If you're talking to a clerk, we'll say who is responsible for the court docket where this case will be heard.
[01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:28.000]  Give me that person so that I can get dates and times that are available so I know when I can request a hearing.
[01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  But now remember...
[01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:30.000]  It will be the coordinator.
[01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  Yeah.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  If you do that, then you also, whatever day you get, you have to give the other side opportunity to agree that they're
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  available and that that date works for them.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:44.000]  It's just like what Dr. Grace says in Juris Dictionary.
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:47.000]  If you get them to agree to go that far, then follow through.
[01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:56.000]  But basically you go to the coordinator and you say, okay, I need three dates within this number of days before this date
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:09:00.000]  where the court's available for a motions hearing.
[01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  I need dates and times.
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  Once you get those three dates and times, you write up a notice of it, you fax it to the other party,
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  and the reason you fax it is because you've got proof you sent it to them.
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:13.000]  Okay.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  Then you ask them in that notice which of these three dates and times are acceptable to your schedule for a motions hearing
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:24.000]  appearance in this matter.
[01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:29.000]  And put whatever the citation numbers are, but don't put a cause number on it.
[01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:31.000]  Okay?
[01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  And so you give them X days to respond, if they don't, and be fair, okay, but don't give them less than 10 days.
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:46.000]  Don't ask for anything within 10 days.
[01:09:46.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  Make it 15 or 20 days or more out, but in Texas it can't go beyond 45.
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:53.000]  Okay.
[01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  Not for these cases.
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  So between 20 and 45 days out, 15 at a minimum.
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:02.000]  Okay.
[01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:08.000]  And then send it to them and give them five business days to notice you as to when.
[01:10:08.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  If they fail to notice you or they say that they can't do any of those, go back to the court coordinator,
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  and if they fail to notice you, pick the one that suits you.
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  If they noticed you that none of those would work, then ask the coordinator for three different dates and times.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:29.000]  Send them that exactly the same way.
[01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:35.000]  If they give you the same rigmarole again, then you pick one of those and just send them a notice.
[01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:40.000]  Well, sorry that the second set didn't accommodate you, but they don't have any more left within the proper time frame.
[01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  So here's the date and time I set.
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  Be there or drop it.
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:46.000]  Awesome.
[01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  So that shows you gave them fair and ample time and notice to address the issue and they were not willing to accommodate.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:54.000]  Okay.
[01:10:54.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  All right.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  So basically just run that process through twice, you know, at least twice.
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  Twice if they respond.
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:02.000]  Okay.
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  Only the once if they don't respond at all.
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  Okay.
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:07.000]  Yeah, good.
[01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:08.000]  Good.
[01:11:08.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  Thank you.
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:10.000]  Thank you.
[01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:11.000]  Okay.
[01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  Yes.
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:13.000]  Yes.
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  Do I have time for one more?
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:15.000]  Yes.
[01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:16.000]  All right.
[01:11:16.000 --> 01:11:18.000]  I think this will be pretty easy for you.
[01:11:18.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  You touched on it earlier in this regards notice in the de novo trial, which should be a de novo trial in the county from a non-record municipal, but obviously they're treating it as an appeal.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:31.000]  Who is treating it as an appeal?
[01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  Well, the county is.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:36.000]  And how is the county treating it as an appeal?
[01:11:36.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  Because after my initial appearance, I go down to the clerk's office, like I was saying, to file those two motions.
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  And I take a look at the record, and there's no information in the record.
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:51.000]  It's just the documents that came up from the non-record municipal.
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  I asked the clerks about this.
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  Well, I just simply asked the clerks.
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:11:55.000]  I was like, can I see the information?
[01:11:55.000 --> 01:11:58.000]  You know, maybe I'll keep it in a different place.
[01:11:58.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  And the clerk said to me that, oh, no, this is an appeal, so this is what it's going to be.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:04.000]  You know, there's not going to be any information.
[01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:13.000]  And I know that's just the clerk talking, and I need to take more steps to completely verify that there will be no information.
[01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  But besides that, and then also...
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:19.000]  Okay, did you ever file a challenge to jurisdiction in the county court?
[01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:30.000]  I tried to, and then that's when they poked a couple holes into my obviously needing one for each cause because I hadn't filed the motion for consolidation.
[01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:32.000]  I didn't know to do that.
[01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  Okay.
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:35.000]  But I tried to.
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:37.000]  All right, well, get that done ASAP.
[01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  And remember that you're challenging the jurisdiction of the county court to even hear this case,
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:47.000]  much less make it an appeal or a de novo because the original trial court never had jurisdiction.
[01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:48.000]  Correct.
[01:12:48.000 --> 01:12:50.000]  Okay.
[01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:51.000]  All right.
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  Okay.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  And then in that, you're going to argue improper notice just like you did in the original case
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:06.000]  because in the original case in that special appearance motion, it deals specifically with 2.04 and 2.05 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:11.000]  where the legislature has mandated that an information is required in any misdemeanor case.
[01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:13.000]  Yes.
[01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  Now, I guess the part with notice that I was getting at is, you know, we typically for injustice in municipals, we get 45018 Bravo for notice of a complaint.
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  That's the complaint.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:28.000]  That's not the information.
[01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  But you have to remember the argument that the complaint is not required to contain all the elements required to be proven.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:39.000]  Therefore, it is not sufficient as a charging instrument.
[01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:45.000]  Only an indictment or information by law is required to have those things.
[01:13:45.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  And they are the only proper notice to the accused because they are the only things that contain all of the elements.
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  If a complaint does not contain all the elements and you raise that issue, the judge is simply going to say,
[01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  well, the complaint's fine because the statutes do not require that a complaint list all the elements.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:13.000]  Oh, well, in that case, I move the court to dismiss the case because the complaint's insufficient as it does not give proper notice,
[01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:18.000]  nor does it contain all the elements that the state is required to prove to provide that notice.
[01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:22.000]  And then they'll attempt to go back and just correct the complaint.
[01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:25.000]  If they don't want to drop it.
[01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:34.000]  So it's a catch-22 problem that they have no easy fix for really because your rights have already been deprived as far as notice goes.
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:36.000]  And they cannot unring that bell.
[01:14:36.000 --> 01:14:40.000]  But they're certainly going to act like they can.
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:47.000]  Well, they don't have – it's even worse than that with the complaint being used in mind because the juror is not even dated.
[01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:49.000]  What do you mean the juror is not dated?
[01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:55.000]  There is not dated. You know, sign and sworn before me on this day of such-and-such is blank.
[01:14:55.000 --> 01:15:04.000]  Okay. Then there's – if you have the seminar material, there's a motion in there for invalid complaint, or I'm sorry, motion to quash the complaint.
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:05.000]  You need to do that.
[01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  And if that specific thing about it being undated is not in there, and I'm not sure if it is or it isn't, but if it's not, make darn sure you add it.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:22.000]  Yeah. I didn't see one in there, but I took the motion to quash the citation, and I was able to tweak that enough to make it suit for that challenge.
[01:15:22.000 --> 01:15:23.000]  Okay.
[01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:29.000]  Okay. All right. That's all I got. Yeah. I'll let all the callers get a whack at you.
[01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  And thanks for everything, and you have a good night.
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  You too, Brandon. Thanks for calling in.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  All right.
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Truthrader in Oregon. Truthrader, you've got not quite a minute before I have to take a break here.
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:48.000]  All right. Hard-headed Truthrader calling in. Good evening, Eddie.
[01:15:48.000 --> 01:16:02.000]  Another day in the life of this paradigm that we're trying to get a shift in, breaking out of this matrix that they've created and they're trying to use against us and siphon money out of us like a cash cow.
[01:16:02.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  Anyway, this is what's going on, and then you get on to the break.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:12.000]  I want to explain to you what my plan is going to be and what I'm going to do in my particular situation.
[01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  I explained last week, I briefly explained to you that there are some things that could happen, and my status as a traveler is very good.
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:33.000]  I have no tickets or anything. I have not been stopped or traffic stopped, whatever you want to call it, illegally encountered or however you want to call it.
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  But it's inevitable. It's coming up, and that's what we discussed last week.
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  Okay. Well, hang on just a second. I'm about to take my break, but we'll finish this on the other side.
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  All right, folks. Call in number 512-646-1984. I've got about 45 minutes left.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  And fortunately, I've got a full caller board here, so y'all call in and get in line, and we will be right back on the other side.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  So y'all hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:18.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular longevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polynverse.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:46.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:04.000]  Chances are you've heard of My Magic Mud, but have you used it?
[01:18:04.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  Thousands of people are blown away by the clean and healthy feeling they experience after just one use.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:13.000]  Here's what Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, has to say about the product.
[01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:16.000]  Hey everybody, this is Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books.
[01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:18.000]  Just want to tell everybody about My Magic Mud.
[01:18:18.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  I use the product, and it makes my teeth feel clean and healthy.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:23.000]  I think it makes them stronger.
[01:18:23.000 --> 01:18:26.000]  I got lots of customers that come in and say the same thing.
[01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:28.000]  You can pick yours up at Brave New Books.
[01:18:28.000 --> 01:18:33.000]  If that wasn't enough, Dr. Griffin Cole, DDS, who's been featured on The Alex Jones Show, loves it too.
[01:18:33.000 --> 01:18:37.000]  Hi, I'm Dr. Griffin Cole, and I got to tell you, I really love this Magic Mud product.
[01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  Because charcoal is so absorbent, it's very effective at taking off all the sticky plaque and debris that gets stuck on our teeth every day.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:45.000]  I highly recommend My Magic Mud.
[01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  If you haven't yet experienced My Magic Mud, it's never too late to brighten your smile and strengthen your teeth.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  Get your jar of My Magic Mud today at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street or order online today at MyMagicMud.com.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Lafogos Radio Network.
[01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:23.000]  Ain't gonna blame me Don't blame me
[01:19:23.000 --> 01:19:33.000]  All right, folks, we are back, Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking to Truth Raider in Oregon, who is going to fill us in on a plan to do what?
[01:19:33.000 --> 01:19:37.000]  Well, good evening, Eddie. Thank you very much again for having me on the show.
[01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:40.000]  This is the plan in breaking out of the matrix.
[01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:48.000]  I equate this somewhat similar to breaking out of the matrix of being under the trance of the pharmaceutical industry.
[01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:52.000]  There is alternative medicines in which we can take care of ourselves with health and nutrition.
[01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  We don't need their pharmacological garbage.
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:57.000]  Same thing with this.
[01:19:57.000 --> 01:20:00.000]  A little different, I guess a whole different scenario concerning this.
[01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:05.000]  This is something that's being forced on us, and we have to comply to what they're saying to do.
[01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:14.000]  But this is my plan to do just for the temporary interim, just for now, just for a month or two, until I know what I'm doing,
[01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:18.000]  because I know I've got a real uphill battle to go on this.
[01:20:18.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  This is not easy.
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:21.000]  This is like learning a whole new language.
[01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:23.000]  This is like learning a whole new way to live.
[01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  Okay. So what's the specifics of the plan?
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:34.000]  The plan is to stay in the matrix for a month or two until I can get better understanding,
[01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:39.000]  better knowledge, better teachings, and understanding what I'm going to do.
[01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:43.000]  And I have the weapons built up that I know that I'm going to need.
[01:20:43.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  Well, you act like you came from the – or you sound like you think you came from the outside to the inside and have to learn it all.
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  How long have you been here?
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  I've been here all my life, but we've been brainwashed all that amount of time.
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  It's unbelievable. It is incredible.
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:03.000]  Once you learn to do things the right way and understand what you're teaching, then, yeah, it looks stupid.
[01:21:03.000 --> 01:21:04.000]  I mean, it looks absolutely ridiculous.
[01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  Oh, okay. I get it.
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:10.000]  So you're equating it to the guy that's lived in a septic tank his whole life,
[01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:14.000]  and the smell of the crap around him wasn't noticed because he's become acclimated.
[01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:17.000]  But now once he's been out for a week, he noticed.
[01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:21.000]  How about that?
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  That stinks.
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  Yeah.
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:25.000]  What is this system?
[01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  So this is what I'm going to do.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  For a month or two, I'm going to go ahead and purchase a binder.
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:31.000]  A binder?
[01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  An insurance binder that they're requiring me to purchase to cover future responsibility,
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:43.000]  proof to them, satisfy what they want me to do for the time being for 30 to 60 days.
[01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:50.000]  Okay. When you say they, who are we talking about and what are we talking about being in this binder?
[01:21:50.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  The State of Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles.
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  Okay. And so what you're going to do is fabricate an insurance binder?
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  If I don't.
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:07.000]  Well, let me tell you the result of if you do.
[01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:10.000]  How well do you like striped sunlight?
[01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:11.000]  Good.
[01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:22.000]  Because most states will consider that tampering with an official record and it's felony fraud in most states.
[01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:24.000]  I mean felony.
[01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  That ain't no misdemeanor.
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:28.000]  I think you might be misunderstanding me.
[01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  I'm going to pick up an insurance binder.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:34.000]  In other words, I'm going to purchase a policy and have the card.
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:39.000]  Okay. Well, there's a difference between a policy and the binder you put one in.
[01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:45.000]  So when you start off an insurance binder, that ain't telling me a whole lot.
[01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  Okay. What I mean is that's what I think they call it, to retain or something like that, to retain a policy or something.
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  I've heard that terminology used.
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:23:01.000]  Okay. Well, that may be internal policy use, but out here it's the policy that matters, not what you're keeping it in.
[01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  Yeah. Yeah. Well, what I mean, the bottom line is I mean I'm going to purchase for 30 to 60 days temporary insurance,
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  temporary liability insurance.
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  Okay. Why?
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  So that way I have time to learn what I'm, what to do correctly because I don't know what I'm doing right now.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:21.000]  And you think you're going to do that in 30 to 60 days?
[01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:24.000]  I have a better chance than doing it right now.
[01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  Okay.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:28.000]  My insurance, my suspension.
[01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:36.000]  And where do you intend to focus your attention to make yourself prepared?
[01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  Well, I'm going to ask you some questions.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  Not for 30 or 60 days or not.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:47.000]  No, not for 30. No, no, no. But I'm going to ask you some questions on what, where to go to get my studies.
[01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:51.000]  Because when we talked last week, you said the first thing you need to do is you need to look at your Oregon statutes
[01:23:51.000 --> 01:23:53.000]  and what the language in your Oregon statutes are.
[01:23:53.000 --> 01:23:55.000]  Okay. Well, let's cover that again real quick.
[01:23:55.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  You need to know the statutes covering court procedure in relation to any charges that can be levied under the transportation system of your particular state.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:08.000]  You need to know what is in the transportation statutes relevant to your particular state.
[01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  And you need to be able to argue how and why they don't apply to you as a commercial entity regulated by those statutes.
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:18.000]  And you don't do that by arguing the statutes themselves.
[01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  You do that by arguing the state has failed to prove the applicability of those statutes to the individual and their actions.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  In other words, you deny, deny, deny so that the burden of proof remains on the shoulders of those making the claim.
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  Anything else is you attempting to disprove their claim, and you can't do it.
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  But their problem is they can't prove their claim either if you force them to try.
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  Right. So the first thing I need to do is learn how to get us into at least a standstill, myself and the state, into a standstill.
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:05.000]  Yeah. You need, if you want that 30 to 60 days to be useful, move to Jersey and New York.
[01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:08.000]  Learn how to argue with a bunch of Italians.
[01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  You can do that, then you can argue with any lawyer in the country.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  All right.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  Try to articulate, formulate quick responses that make sense and rebut presumptions.
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:30.000]  That's what you need to learn to do verbally and mentally.
[01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:35.000]  But you need to know what rules allow you to apply it and how.
[01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:41.000]  That's where the study of the procedure codes come in that deal with how the courts are required to handle these cases,
[01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:49.000]  which means you need to know what type of case the court is required to treat it as, civil, criminal, or administrative in any particular venue.
[01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:56.000]  Right. I don't think they consider quasi-criminality here. I heard something about quasi-criminal.
[01:25:56.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  Well, when you start looking through it to find out who the department is that actually controls those statutes,
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:06.000]  then you'll probably find out, like in most of the states, it's administrative.
[01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:16.000]  Because if you look in the state administrative code, you will probably find whatever your state police department agency is listed there as an agency of the state for those purposes.
[01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  Okay.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:23.000]  And if you read through it far enough, you will probably find the declaration that they are not a law enforcement agency.
[01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:26.000]  That's exactly what it says here in Texas.
[01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  Okay. All right. This is my question. I'm going to write these down.
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:37.000]  Where do I go, first of all, to find this information?
[01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:39.000]  Well, you've got two possible locations.
[01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:46.000]  One is the Internet for your particular state legislature, which you can get to what you need to find.
[01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  You can type in any state of the union that statename.gov.
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:59.000]  Every state has that domain name purchased, even though it may redirect you to something completely different.
[01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  You type that into the URL line, and it will take you to that state's legislative website.
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  You just find the part on there that deals with laws and statutes or codes or whatever,
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:15.000]  and that will then lead you into the particular ones you need if you look hard enough and far enough.
[01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:18.000]  If you can't find it on your own, call a county clerk.
[01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:20.000]  Call the secretary of state.
[01:27:20.000 --> 01:27:25.000]  Call somebody that would know where to find the laws, codes, and statutes online if your state has them.
[01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:28.000]  I don't know of any state that does not.
[01:27:28.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  Second place, a law library, whether it be in a courthouse, a lawyer's office, or a university.
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:39.000]  Library, university, okay.
[01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  Write that down.
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:48.000]  Now, any library that is a federal book repository will also have a law library.
[01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  Okay, book repository, okay.
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  But I'm looking for organ statutes in regards to the transportation code.
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:27:59.000]  Is that correct?
[01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:02.000]  It will either say transportation or motor vehicle.
[01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  Motor vehicle, yeah.
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:06.000]  It may refer to motor vehicle pretty much here.
[01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:09.000]  Well, they refer to that all the time,
[01:28:09.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  but the code or the chapter is going to be titled one of those things, motor vehicles or transportation.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  Okay, transportation, got it.
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  Law library.
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:25.000]  And the other one, whatever your particular state considers the rules of procedure,
[01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:30.000]  they will try to use the criminal procedure rules most of the time.
[01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:34.000]  But if you make the argument that this is not criminal, despite how they're treating it,
[01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  and you produce the information that proves it's not criminal,
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  then you need to know what the civil rules of procedure are as well,
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:44.000]  because that's what they'll be forced into when they can't use the criminal.
[01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:50.000]  Well, here in the state of Oregon, they consider driving on the suspended is a lower class.
[01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:53.000]  I don't care what they consider it.
[01:28:53.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  You need to be able to make the argument that they are considering it incorrectly,
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:04.000]  and they are applying the law and the procedure incorrectly.
[01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:05.000]  Right.
[01:29:05.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  Now, that's not your biggest point to make, even though it's big enough.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  But it's one they cannot easily correct, because if they do correct it,
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:26.000]  then they've admitted they've wrongfully convicted everybody that ever came before you.
[01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  And they're not about to assume that liability.
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  No.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  Okay.
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  All right.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  All right.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:37.000]  Is that covered enough for you for now?
[01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:38.000]  That starts me.
[01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  All right.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  Well, good luck.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  I've got an uphill battle.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  Yes, you do, Mount Everest.
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  Here you come.
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  All right.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  I'll be back in touch with you on the update about it in the future.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  Okay.
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:54.000]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:30:02.000]  Eric Crystal, y'all hang on.
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:08.000]  Fake tanning is marketed as a safe way to get that healthy glow without spending time in the sun.
[01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  But it's actually not so safe after all.
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:17.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back in a moment with the dark side of spray-on tans and self-tanning lotions.
[01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:19.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:23.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:28.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:36.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:39.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:43.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:47.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  Americans spend millions on fake tanning products for that sun-kissed look, but are they safe?
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:53.000]  No.
[01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  The active ingredient is typically a chemical called dihydroxyacetone, or DHA,
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  that works by producing free radicals to darken the skin like an apple when it's cut.
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  We need to say DHA disrupts the normal cell cycle, causes genetic damage, and accelerates cell death.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  What's more, self-tanners often contain coumarin and epiperabin,
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  chemicals linked with cancer that can kill skin cells and cause reproductive harm.
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:24.000]  So spend 20 minutes in the sun instead, and leave that fake stuff on the shelf.
[01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:47.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:05.000]  After work, I'm so tired that I want to be left alone to sleep.
[01:32:05.000 --> 01:32:07.000]  Hey, listen to me.
[01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:08.000]  Who are you?
[01:32:08.000 --> 01:32:12.000]  I'm you years ago, when you felt healthy and young and everything worked on your body.
[01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:13.000]  Do you remember that?
[01:32:13.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Yes.
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:15.000]  I wish I felt like that now.
[01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:20.000]  You can feel like that again with a new micro-plant powder formulation called Eye and Eye Now.
[01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:25.000]  It cleans the entire body from head to toe and feeds the body what it really needs.
[01:32:25.000 --> 01:32:28.000]  You'll be in a better mood, and you'll find more drive in your romantic life.
[01:32:28.000 --> 01:32:29.000]  Really?
[01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:31.000]  I got to try Eye and Eye Now.
[01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  It'd feel good again.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:36.000]  It also protects you from radiation, heavy metals, four-eyed chlorine, and bromine,
[01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  including cancer and most major diseases.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  You'll be amazed.
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:41.000]  You can be your own doctor.
[01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:44.000]  I want to keep you out of the hospital and off pharmaceuticals.
[01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Wow.
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  Why are you so nice to me?
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  Because I'm you.
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  You're out of shape, and I need a better-looking future.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:53.000]  Call 888-910-4367.
[01:32:53.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  That's 888-910-4367.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  Or visit microplantpowder.com, microplantpowder.com.
[01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:10.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:10.000 --> 01:33:24.000]  Yeah, who you want to check?
[01:33:24.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  All right, folks.
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:48.000]  We are back, and we are going to talk with Eric in Georgia now.
[01:33:48.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  Eric, what can we do for you?
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  Hey, Eddie, how are you doing tonight?
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  So far, so grand, man.
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:56.000]  Well, that's good.
[01:33:56.000 --> 01:33:57.000]  I'm glad.
[01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:00.000]  I have a problem out here in Georgia.
[01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  It's about a debt collection that I've been going through right now.
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:10.000]  What has happened is I have an alleged debt with a gym membership,
[01:34:10.000 --> 01:34:14.000]  and the gym membership went, I guess, would be a bit from vacant,
[01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:19.000]  and the debt was, you know, turned over to that collection agency.
[01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:25.000]  And the agency is coming after me for the grand total of $125.
[01:34:25.000 --> 01:34:29.000]  And I was wondering if, I mean,
[01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:32.000]  this would be a good thing to practice on to learn how to, you know,
[01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:35.000]  how the law works and how to get to a poor system
[01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  and to learn how to write motions and stuff like that.
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  It's not very much.
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:41.000]  Actually, none of that is what you want to do.
[01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:46.000]  You do not want to fight the debt collector in state court for any reason.
[01:34:46.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  What you want to do is fight the debt collector in federal court
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  and make them pay you for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act,
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  which most likely they have already perpetrated.
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:00.000]  So here's what I'm going to recommend before you continue.
[01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:02.000]  And you can let me know if I'm not on the right track
[01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  of where you're trying to take this with your questions.
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:07.000]  All right.
[01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:11.000]  First thing is you start recording, if at all possible, every communication.
[01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:13.000]  You save every letter, every envelope,
[01:35:13.000 --> 01:35:16.000]  every piece of paper that's sent to you by this agency.
[01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:20.000]  You record everything that they say or do in any contact with you
[01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:22.000]  over the phone or anything else.
[01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:28.000]  You also make sure and keep a phone log relating to dates, times,
[01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:32.000]  lengths of conversation, and so on and so forth.
[01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  As well as whoever you spoke to, if you spoke to an individual directly.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:40.000]  Well, I already downloaded a program off of Google Play
[01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  that records all of my phone calls automatically.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  But see, they have not studied, from what I'm saying,
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  it might be because they've not started the dunning process yet.
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  They've not sent me any letters.
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:54.000]  This is harassing phone calls.
[01:35:54.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  Okay.
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:56.000]  That's part of what I'm telling you.
[01:35:56.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  Let me finish where I'm going with this.
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:02.000]  You need to go on to the ruleoflawradio.com website.
[01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:07.000]  And if you scroll down toward the middle of the page on the left-hand side,
[01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:10.000]  you're going to see some four banners stacked together.
[01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:12.000]  One will say, win your lawsuit without a lawyer.
[01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:14.000]  And the other one is blue.
[01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:17.000]  And it keeps rotating the message, how to stop debt collectors,
[01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:20.000]  Michael Mears, and all this.
[01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  That package from Michael Mears contains all of the documents
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  and information that you need to use to file suit in federal court
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  against a debt collector who has violated the FDCPA
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:38.000]  or the Fair Credit Reporting Act, SCRA.
[01:36:38.000 --> 01:36:42.000]  So by the time you get done with your lawsuit,
[01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  you can make them pay you hundreds or thousands of dollars
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:49.000]  for violations under those statutes,
[01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  because those federal statutes make their violation a civil rights violation
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:58.000]  for which you can sue.
[01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  And it has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with the alleged debt.
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:06.000]  You never argue the debt.
[01:37:06.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  You never disclaim the debt.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  You never do any of that.
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  You simply assert that they have violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:19.000]  in violation of this section of statute,
[01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:23.000]  and I am making this claim against them for that violation.
[01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  And each violation can be up to $1,000.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:28.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  Okay.
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  Uh-huh.
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:32.000]  That's where I would go with this.
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:33.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:34.000]  All right.
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:37.000]  Now, the very first thing that you will do in the Michael Mears
[01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:41.000]  is send a cease-and-desist letter to the collection agency
[01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:46.000]  telling them that they are not to call you in any form or fashion anymore,
[01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  that you will accept communications from them only written U.S. mail.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:56.000]  And if they continue to call from that point on,
[01:37:56.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  now it gets even worse for them.
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:01.000]  Uh-huh.
[01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:02.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:10.000]  Now, if you can save your call history and things like that on that phone you have...
[01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:11.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:12.000] ...do that.
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:16.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:38:16.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  That's great.
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:20.000]  I've started that process of, you know, saving my phone calls or anything
[01:38:20.000 --> 01:38:25.000]  and getting my letter, verification of that letter and my dispute letter ready.
[01:38:25.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  Okay.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  And I'm going to send that forward and send it by registered mail.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  You send everything registered or certified mail, not registered.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:37.000]  You don't have to send it to one specific person.
[01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:40.000]  You send it certified mail, return receipt, request it.
[01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  Now, if you know a specific person that has been put into a communication with you,
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:51.000]  the only problem with sending it registered is, is if that person is no longer there.
[01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:52.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:53.000]  Okay.
[01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:58.000]  So sending it to the agency, certified mail, return receipt, request it,
[01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:01.000]  allows anybody working there to sign for it.
[01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:03.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:08.000]  Thus making delivery, for your purposes, much simpler.
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  Uh-huh.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:10.000]  Certified mail.
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  Perfect.
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:13.000]  Return receipt, request it.
[01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:17.000]  And you get the little green card back with somebody's signature on it.
[01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:19.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:23.000]  Can I ask you a question about the traffic law real quick, if I may get quick?
[01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  Sure.
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  That's what I've been studying on this, that thing just come up.
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  Over here in my Georgia law, it's all about that.
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  According to Georgia law, you must plead.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  They force.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  Isn't that coercion?
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  They try to force everyone to plead, but they also say that if you refuse to plead,
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:45.000]  because they can't make you plea, and the reason they can't is because there are
[01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  waivers of rights, very serious rights, associated with the entering of a plea.
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  Therefore, they cannot force you to enter a plea.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:59.000]  But without that plea, they can't move forward.
[01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  So most state legislatures have made a statute that allows the magistrate to
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:08.000]  enter a plea for you if you will not.
[01:40:08.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  Now, if you are making the argument that the court has not proven jurisdiction on
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:18.000]  the record and state has not proved standing on the record, and that judge
[01:40:18.000 --> 01:40:23.000]  enters a plea without jurisdiction, he has just thrown himself into the
[01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  Mixmaster on high speed.
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:30.000]  Well, thank you for all your help, and I will continue to study.
[01:40:30.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  I appreciate it a lot.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:32.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:34.000]  Well, good luck.
[01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  All right, now we're going to go to Crystal in Nevada.
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  Now, there's a name you don't want to hear in Nevada.
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  Come on.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:43.000]  Hey, Eddie.
[01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:48.000]  I was wondering if you happen to know how I can file a lien against a police
[01:40:48.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  officer's bond?
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:52.000]  Well, you don't file liens against their bonds.
[01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  Their bond is an insurance policy.
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:40:58.000]  You file a claim against it like you would somebody else's car insurance.
[01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  Yeah, like their car insurance, so a claim.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:02.000]  So how do I do that?
[01:41:02.000 --> 01:41:07.000]  Well, if you know who their bonding company is or what they have to go
[01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  through to do it, you either file it through some office of the city or the
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  county, depending upon who the officer works for, or you do it directly
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  through the insurance company if you know who they are.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:21.000]  Okay.
[01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:24.000]  What are the chances of finding that out from the...
[01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  Everybody's protecting everybody.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  The DA won't take my tort letter.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:29.000]  No one wants to take any...
[01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:31.000]  Well, they don't have a choice.
[01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:34.000]  You can send the tort letter, certified mail return receipt request,
[01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:37.000]  and somebody's going to sign for it as long as you don't put what it is
[01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  and who it's from on the outside.
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:42.000]  Well, they say that every claim has to go through the police department.
[01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  I said, well...
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:44.000]  No, they don't.
[01:41:44.000 --> 01:41:47.000]  The police department has absolutely nothing to do with a tort claim.
[01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  Absolutely nothing.
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:51.000]  Okay.
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:55.000]  If this is a municipal police department, send it through the city manager
[01:41:55.000 --> 01:41:57.000]  or the city secretary.
[01:41:57.000 --> 01:42:01.000]  The city secretary is the official custodian of records for most cities.
[01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:07.000]  The city manager is the person liable for all of the employees of that city,
[01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:12.000]  sometimes in some places even more so than the mayor.
[01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:14.000]  Okay.
[01:42:14.000 --> 01:42:17.000]  Well, I know in person no one wanted to deal with me at all.
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:19.000]  Well, then don't do it in person.
[01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:23.000]  You're not required to notice them in person of a tort.
[01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  Okay.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:28.000]  But at the same time, you can also file a public information request
[01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  via the city secretary and demand to know who carries the insurance policy
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  for the bonds on city employees, specifically the municipal police department.
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:42.000]  Okay.
[01:42:42.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  And as a matter of public record, they will have to disclose that through a PIR.
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:51.000]  All you need to do is look up whatever the public information statute is
[01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:55.000]  in your particular republic and apply it.
[01:42:55.000 --> 01:42:57.000]  Okay.
[01:42:57.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  All right.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:42:59.000]  I just felt like I was getting stonewalled.
[01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:00.000]  Well, you are.
[01:43:00.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  They don't want people to know about those insurance policies
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:04.000]  for the purpose of making claims.
[01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:05.000]  Right.
[01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  Okay.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:08.000]  All right.
[01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:09.000]  Okay.
[01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:10.000]  Sounds good.
[01:43:10.000 --> 01:43:11.000]  All right.
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:12.000]  Crystal, good luck.
[01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:13.000]  All right.
[01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:14.000]  Thanks.
[01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:15.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  All right.
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  Now we're going to go to Arvel in D.C.
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:19.000]  Arvel?
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:20.000]  How are you doing today?
[01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  So far, so grand.
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:23.000]  What can we do for you?
[01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:25.000]  I have a situation going on.
[01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  My house was broken into by my mortgage company.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  Your house was broken into by the mortgage company?
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:32.000]  Yeah.
[01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  They hired a service provider to break in with five brothers and five brothers.
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:37.000]  Okay.
[01:43:37.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  Well, hang on just a second, Arvel.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  We're about to go to break.
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:40.000]  I'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:41.000]  So hang on, okay?
[01:43:41.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  Okay.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  All right, folks.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  I've got one segment left, and I think I can get through my callers in that time,
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  but we will see.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:51.000]  Y'all hang in there, guys.
[01:43:51.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  I will be right back, so y'all listen in.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Sorry.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:09.000]  What?
[01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:12.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:16.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[01:44:16.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:22.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease
[01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity,
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  but there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover,
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  and because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:46.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:50.000]  then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:44:57.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include
[01:44:57.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:08.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[01:45:08.000 --> 01:45:13.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how
[01:45:13.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:20.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:20.000 --> 01:45:24.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:24.000 --> 01:45:29.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:29.000 --> 01:45:32.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:32.000 --> 01:45:35.000]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:44.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:48.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:48.000 --> 01:45:53.000]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.000 --> 01:45:57.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:57.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  All right, folks.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:35.000]  We are back, and we are speaking with Arvill in D.C.
[01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:38.000]  All right, Arvill, you said your mortgage company has hired someone
[01:46:38.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  to break into your house.
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:41.000]  Can you explain that?
[01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  They've changed the locks.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:46.000]  They've changed the locks?
[01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:48.000]  And I took the locks off.
[01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:52.000]  This is about two years ago when we first started the battle.
[01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  And I took them back, took them to Small Claims Court
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:46:57.000]  and fought them in Small Claims Court.
[01:46:57.000 --> 01:47:02.000]  I went after the company, the owner of the company,
[01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:07.000]  but I should have just took the whole corporation because they're operating in fiction.
[01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  So we had been back and forth, back and forth, back and forth,
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:18.000]  and they broke in the house before they filed any papers downtown.
[01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:21.000]  Okay, and did you catch them in the act?
[01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:23.000]  No, I didn't catch them in the act.
[01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  They just put the sign in the window, five brothers,
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  and after they put the sign in the window, they changed the locks and winterized it.
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:33.000]  Okay.
[01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:37.000]  And after that, you know, we've been battling back and forth, back and forth, back and forth,
[01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:41.000]  back and forth, and, you know, asked them to settle the claim privately, not publicly.
[01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:44.000]  You know, I've been on top of them.
[01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:50.000]  And my payoff was only like $14,000 or something like that.
[01:47:50.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  The payoff on your mortgage?
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:47:55.000]  Yeah, the ledge payoff, the ledge, you know.
[01:47:55.000 --> 01:47:56.000]  Okay.
[01:47:56.000 --> 01:47:57.000]  You know.
[01:47:57.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  And so we've been going back and forth, back and forth,
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:04.000]  and I sent them all kinds of affidavits and stuff, and I sent them one of them.
[01:48:04.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  I asked them, did you prove to me you gave me a loan?
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:07.000]  They had a fee schedule.
[01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:08.000]  They didn't send it.
[01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:10.000]  They didn't react on that.
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  Everything I sent them, they never wouldn't ask no questions.
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:17.000]  Then we got to the court part, and everything was going along good
[01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  until I jumped the $150,000 suit on them, and they kind of backed up off me.
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:24.000]  But now I just kind of want to bring the thing home and finish it off.
[01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  I'm trying to figure out what should I do at this point.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:27.000]  Okay.
[01:48:27.000 --> 01:48:29.000]  Well, at what stage of this are you?
[01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:31.000]  You said you filed a suit against them.
[01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:33.000]  Has the suit been heard?
[01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  No, they just ain't done nothing.
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  They just kind of like dismissed it, though.
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:38.000]  What do you mean?
[01:48:38.000 --> 01:48:39.000]  Okay.
[01:48:39.000 --> 01:48:40.000]  Who dismissed it?
[01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  No, I mean the court.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:42.000]  The court kind of dismissed it.
[01:48:42.000 --> 01:48:43.000]  Okay.
[01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:46.000]  What did the court say about the suit when they dismissed it?
[01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:51.000]  They just, the court really didn't dismiss it.
[01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:53.000]  What happened was they kind of like backed up off of it.
[01:48:53.000 --> 01:48:56.000]  Who backed up off of it?
[01:48:56.000 --> 01:49:03.000]  The service provider kind of, no, the five brothers.
[01:49:03.000 --> 01:49:04.000]  Okay.
[01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:05.000]  Well, wait a minute.
[01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:06.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  What does your lawsuit have to do with them backing up in their actions against you?
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:15.000]  Your lawsuit is separate and apart from that, is it not?
[01:49:15.000 --> 01:49:16.000]  Yes.
[01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:17.000]  You're right.
[01:49:17.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  Okay.
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:19.000]  All right.
[01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:21.000]  So where is your lawsuit?
[01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:25.000]  Well, here's where I'm at now.
[01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  The last thing that I sent them, they settled the case about two months ago.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:32.000]  I sent them something.
[01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:33.000]  They settled the case about two months ago.
[01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:34.000]  Okay.
[01:49:34.000 --> 01:49:35.000]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:36.000]  They settled what case?
[01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:37.000]  It's two settled it.
[01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:38.000]  I sent them something in two settled it.
[01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  Okay.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:42.000]  So you sent this company a settlement request?
[01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:43.000]  No.
[01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  Yeah, I asked them to settle the case privately.
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:47.000]  Okay.
[01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:51.000]  And they didn't, you know, see whether they would go answer that way.
[01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  You know what I'm saying?
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  Okay.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:54.000]  So you didn't file a suit?
[01:49:54.000 --> 01:49:56.000]  Yeah, I did file a suit.
[01:49:56.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  Okay.
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:49:58.000]  I filed a suit.
[01:49:58.000 --> 01:50:00.000]  Then you're not settling this privately.
[01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:06.000]  The moment you filed that suit, private was out the window, unless you meet afterwards
[01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:08.000]  in agreement with the court to cut a deal.
[01:50:08.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  Okay.
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  That's what you're saying.
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:12.000]  Okay.
[01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  So that's what's got me kind of confused here.
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  In your lawsuit, have you pursued it and prosecuted the suit?
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:25.000]  No, I have not finished with it yet, though.
[01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:28.000]  Explain finished with it.
[01:50:28.000 --> 01:50:34.000]  I'm trying to figure out a way to go because last time I took them to court.
[01:50:34.000 --> 01:50:36.000]  Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:37.000]  That's an incomplete answer.
[01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:40.000]  You're changing subjects without an answer.
[01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:42.000]  What do you mean finish it?
[01:50:42.000 --> 01:50:43.000]  Okay.
[01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:45.000]  I sued them in small claims court.
[01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:49.000]  I took them to small claims court for $30,000.
[01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:50.000]  Okay.
[01:50:50.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  And I tried to sue them for $30,000 in small claims court, but I think where I went wrong
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  there, I went, the judge wanted to hear my case again.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  But she wanted to hear it again, but what happened was that she wanted to hear it again,
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:10.000]  but she just didn't, she wanted me to come after the corporation,
[01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:12.000]  not the owner of the corporation.
[01:51:12.000 --> 01:51:14.000]  That's where I made my mistake in that.
[01:51:14.000 --> 01:51:17.000]  Well, if everything there is happening under the name of the corporation that's moving
[01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  against you, then that would be true.
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:22.000]  Okay.
[01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:29.000]  Now, if you, what type of corporation are they established as?
[01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:36.000]  They are, and I do know they're established, and I can't think of the state.
[01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:38.000]  It's not going to come to me now.
[01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:39.000]  No, no, no.
[01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:40.000]  Okay.
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:43.000]  What I mean by this is what type of corporation?
[01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:45.000]  Are they an LLC?
[01:51:45.000 --> 01:51:47.000]  Are they a partnership?
[01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:49.000]  What are they?
[01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  I think they're LLC.
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:52.000]  Okay.
[01:51:52.000 --> 01:51:53.000]  You think?
[01:51:53.000 --> 01:51:54.000]  About for sure.
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:55.000]  Well, here's your problem.
[01:51:55.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  Here's your problem.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:51:59.000]  Here's the things you need to do first.
[01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:00.000]  Okay.
[01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:02.000]  Contact the secretary of state.
[01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:08.000]  Have them do a search on all known entity names that have been used by this company
[01:52:08.000 --> 01:52:12.000]  to any communication they have sent to you, because they may send it to you under
[01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:14.000]  several different corporate names.
[01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:20.000]  Any alteration in the name, like for instance, if one says Inc. and the other says LLC,
[01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:24.000]  those are two different corporations.
[01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:28.000]  They are not one and the same.
[01:52:28.000 --> 01:52:33.000]  You need to see whether or not, one, is this corporation properly registered with the
[01:52:33.000 --> 01:52:36.000]  secretary of state to do business in D.C.?
[01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:40.000]  Two, or Maryland, wherever it is.
[01:52:40.000 --> 01:52:41.000]  Okay.
[01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:51.000]  Two, does the state of Maryland require any fees to remain in good standing like California does?
[01:52:51.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  You got to pay franchise tax fees to maintain good standing in that state as a registered
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:52:58.000]  corporation.
[01:52:58.000 --> 01:53:04.000]  Have they done that for all the corporate names they're using to communicate with you
[01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:08.000]  and take action against you or to rebut actions you make against them?
[01:53:08.000 --> 01:53:10.000]  Are they properly registered?
[01:53:10.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  Are they properly up to date in their fees?
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:14.000]  Okay.
[01:53:14.000 --> 01:53:19.000]  Because all of that will determine whether or not they have any legal authority to
[01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:25.000]  maintain any suit in that court, in any court of that state.
[01:53:25.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  All right?
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:31.000]  Which means if they don't, you can sue them, but they can never sue you.
[01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:33.000]  Okay.
[01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:38.000]  Therefore, they have no claim against you either because they're not allowed to operate
[01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  in that state, not as anything, not as a servicer, not as a lender, not as a mortgager.
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  You get it?
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:50.000]  I get it.
[01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:51.000]  All right.
[01:53:51.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  You need to find all that out first.
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  Then you will know where and how to take your suit properly.
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:00.000]  Okay.
[01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:01.000]  I understand now.
[01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  Okay.
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:06.000]  You're telling me that way I could probably trip them up then because a lot of them I've
[01:54:06.000 --> 01:54:11.000]  seen in the past, they'd be doing business out of state, not even registered or nothing.
[01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:12.000]  Exactly.
[01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:18.000]  Which they cannot do in 99.9% of the states of the union.
[01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:23.000]  And how often does this, how prevalent is it?
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  That's what I'm looking at.
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:27.000]  Well, I don't know.
[01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:29.000]  That's a statistic not within my realm.
[01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:32.000]  I do know, however, that it happens.
[01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:40.000]  In fact, I helped a young lady and somebody else with her get a company in Oklahoma thrown
[01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:45.000]  completely out of court because they were completely unable to maintain a suit there.
[01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:48.000]  And they were trying to take their home on a foreclosure or a home.
[01:54:48.000 --> 01:54:50.000]  I don't know if it was theirs.
[01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:53.000]  But they filed suit and they won.
[01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:56.000]  They got the company's case kicked out.
[01:54:56.000 --> 01:55:02.000]  The mortgage was wiped out basically as far as I understood the discussion we had because the
[01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:07.000]  company could not maintain suit or perform any actions as a corporation because they were in
[01:55:07.000 --> 01:55:12.000]  arrears on their fees and were no longer validly registered in the state.
[01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:14.000]  Thanks a lot for the information.
[01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:15.000]  You're welcome.
[01:55:15.000 --> 01:55:16.000]  Okay.
[01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:17.000]  Appreciate you.
[01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:18.000]  All right.
[01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:19.000]  Good luck.
[01:55:19.000 --> 01:55:20.000]  All right.
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:22.000]  I now have Kenneth in Michigan.
[01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:25.000]  Kenneth, I have two minutes to give you.
[01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:26.000]  All righty.
[01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:27.000]  Well, I'll take it.
[01:55:27.000 --> 01:55:29.000]  What you got?
[01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:40.000]  My question for you is with the...
[01:55:40.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  I hear Terry back there.
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  Yep.
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:44.000]  That's Terry.
[01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:48.000]  We were looking at a bunch of other stuff and I got a little sidetracked with because
[01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:55.000]  we were talking a little bit about the statutes of limitations on challenging subject matter
[01:55:55.000 --> 01:56:00.000]  jurisdiction.
[01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  Would it be a wise idea to challenge jurisdiction again after a judgment has been ordered
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:08.000]  against you?
[01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:12.000]  You can challenge jurisdiction any time.
[01:56:12.000 --> 01:56:17.000]  Before, during, 50 years after.
[01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  Okay.
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  But I guess my question is how would you actually go about doing that?
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:27.000]  You file suit in the court.
[01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:30.000]  You have to file in the court a challenge to the jurisdiction of the court to make the
[01:56:30.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  decision that it made.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:37.000]  Okay.
[01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:39.000]  All right.
[01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:46.000]  And basically what you would have to do in this predicament would be to make a motion
[01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:53.000]  to overturn the verdict basically.
[01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:59.000]  Okay.
[01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:06.000]  I guess I was having a little bit of problems with my appeal and I didn't get my claim of
[01:57:06.000 --> 01:57:14.000]  appeal or my notice of appeal in on time, but as I was reading some of the Michigan
[01:57:14.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  court rules.
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  Okay.
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:22.000]  Jurisdiction is one of the things that can be raised on appeal for the first time.
[01:57:22.000 --> 01:57:25.000]  It doesn't have to be raised at trial.
[01:57:25.000 --> 01:57:30.000]  But the fact of the matter is, is you can go back to the trial court and challenge the
[01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  jurisdiction anyway.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:41.000]  Now, whether or not that, since a jurisdiction has no time limit, then if your entire challenge
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:46.000]  is based upon jurisdiction and you can show the court never had it, then you're filing
[01:57:46.000 --> 01:57:48.000]  an appeal in that case.
[01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  The court's going to look at it one of two ways.
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:54.000]  Remand it back to the trial court to prove jurisdiction on the record or they're going
[01:57:54.000 --> 01:57:58.000]  to take the appeal and say, yes, we agree or disagree about jurisdiction.
[01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:02.000]  And if they had it and you didn't file, you lose.
[01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  If they didn't have it, we remand and tell them to reverse the ruling or we vacate the
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  judgment and you win.
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  Okay.
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:12.000]  Okay.
[01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:13.000]  All right.
[01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  All right.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  Kenneth, anything else?
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  Well, I have a question on the...
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:17.000]  Okay.
[01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  Well, if you've got a longer question in five seconds, I ain't got time to answer it.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:19.000]  All right.
[01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  So send me an email and I'll see what I can do.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  All right.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:22.000]  Thanks a lot.
[01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  All right.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:24.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  All right, folks.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  I have been your host and will hopefully continue to be your host on Monday night.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:28.000]  Thank you.
[01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:29.000]  All right.
[01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  All right.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  All right.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  All right.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  All right.
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  All right.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:35.000]  All right.
[01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  All right.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:37.000]  All right.
[01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:38.000]  All right.
[01:58:38.000 --> 01:58:39.000]  All right.
[01:58:39.000 --> 01:58:40.000]  I will be your host on Monday nights.
[01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:42.640]  Eddie Craig, thank you all for listening in.
[01:58:42.640 --> 01:58:47.280]  I hope that your weeks are blessed and all the days to come that you learn to fight for
[01:58:47.280 --> 01:58:49.260]  liberty and love the Lord.
[01:58:49.260 --> 01:58:50.240]  Here we go.
[01:58:50.240 --> 01:58:51.240]  Here we go.
[01:58:51.240 --> 01:58:56.880]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.880 --> 01:58:57.880]  recovery version.
[01:58:57.880 --> 01:59:03.080]  The New Testament recovery version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:03.080 --> 01:59:08.740]  says verse by verse helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.740 --> 01:59:17.280]  your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit
[01:59:17.280 --> 01:59:25.420]  us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000
[01:59:25.420 --> 01:59:30.580]  cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This
[01:59:30.580 --> 01:59:35.580]  is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery
[01:59:35.580 --> 01:59:46.860]  Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at
[01:59:46.860 --> 01:59:56.820]  bfa.org. Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.