[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates.
[00:08.000 --> 00:11.000]  Online at thelibertybeat.com.
[00:11.000 --> 00:16.000]  I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, February 24th, 2014.
[00:16.000 --> 00:20.000]  Gold opened today at $1,331.
[00:20.000 --> 00:27.000]  Silver opened at $22.02, while Bitcoin is trading at $569.90.
[00:27.000 --> 00:34.000]  Support for Liberty Beat comes from SovereignBTC, media, marketing, and consulting for the Bitcoin ecosystem.
[00:34.000 --> 00:38.000]  Online at SovereignBTC.com.
[00:38.000 --> 00:45.000]  Support for Liberty Beat also comes from Mass Appeal, affordable, high-quality printing, now accepting Bitcoin.
[00:45.000 --> 00:48.000]  Find them online at MassAppealInc.com.
[00:48.000 --> 00:53.000]  The CEO of Mt. Gox has resigned from the board of the Bitcoin Foundation.
[00:53.000 --> 00:59.000]  Reuters reports Mark Carpally stepped down Sunday with the resignation effective immediately.
[00:59.000 --> 01:06.000]  His decision follows numerous apparent missteps and technical issues incurred by the Tokyo-based Mt. Gox Bitcoin Exchange,
[01:06.000 --> 01:09.000]  including the decision to halt all withdrawals.
[01:09.000 --> 01:18.000]  Mt. Gox was a founding member and one of the three elected industry representatives on the Bitcoin Foundation board.
[01:18.000 --> 01:23.000]  Hong Kong's first Bitcoin retail outlet is set to open on Friday.
[01:23.000 --> 01:32.000]  The South China Morning Post reports the 400-square-foot shop in Sai Ying Hun will allow walk-in customers to trade cash for Bitcoin.
[01:32.000 --> 01:40.000]  An identity card and proof of address will be required of customers in order to comply with customs and excise rules regarding money laundering.
[01:40.000 --> 01:49.000]  As the retail outlet is set to open, several firms are working to install Bitcoin ATMs at locations in Hong Kong.
[01:49.000 --> 01:54.000]  The United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, commonly known as DARPA,
[01:54.000 --> 01:59.000]  has announced they will be working on a smartphone-piloted military drone.
[01:59.000 --> 02:05.000]  The drone will be designed to assist troops on the front lines of battle in avoiding explosive devices.
[02:05.000 --> 02:14.000]  Drone pilots would fly the machines using the aerial reconfigurable embedded system installed on a smartphone or tablet.
[02:14.000 --> 02:19.000]  Support for Deliberative E comes from Dorothy Erminger at Capstar Lending.
[02:19.000 --> 02:23.000]  Dorothy can walk you through the ins and outs of buying a home.
[02:23.000 --> 02:34.000]  Give her a call, 512-343-6494, or apply online at calledorothy.com, in MLS No. 216-624.
[02:34.000 --> 02:42.000]  Support also comes from My Magic Mud, available at Brave New Books or online at mymagicmud.com,
[02:42.000 --> 02:46.000]  and from Brave New Books, online at bravenewbookstore.com.
[02:46.000 --> 02:51.000]  This is the Liberty Beat for Monday, February 24, 2014.
[02:51.000 --> 03:16.000]  Check out the website at thelibertybeat.com.
[03:16.000 --> 03:22.000]  Really, man, come on, six o'clock news says somebody's been shot,
[03:22.000 --> 03:26.000]  somebody's been abused, somebody blew up a building,
[03:26.000 --> 03:30.000]  somebody stole their car, somebody got away,
[03:30.000 --> 03:38.000]  somebody didn't get too far, yeah, they didn't get too far.
[03:38.000 --> 03:47.000]  Grandpappy told my pappy back in my day, son, a man had to answer for the ways that he'd done.
[03:47.000 --> 03:53.000]  Take all the rope in Texas by the tall old tree, round up all of them bad boys,
[03:53.000 --> 04:01.000]  hang a hide on the street, for all the people to see.
[04:01.000 --> 04:07.000]  That justice is one thing you should always find, you gotta settle up your boys,
[04:07.000 --> 04:09.000]  you gotta draw a hard line.
[04:09.000 --> 04:13.000]  When the guns won't settle, we'll sing a victory tune,
[04:13.000 --> 04:17.000]  and we'll all meet back at the local sumo.
[04:17.000 --> 04:22.000]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing,
[04:22.000 --> 04:27.000]  whiskey for my man, beer for my horses.
[04:27.000 --> 04:31.000]  Yes, sir, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show,
[04:31.000 --> 04:33.000]  and this is your host, Eddie Craig.
[04:33.000 --> 04:38.000]  This is February 24th, 2014, we are live tonight.
[04:38.000 --> 04:43.000]  Catastrophe and all other manner of disaster withstanding, or not withstanding,
[04:43.000 --> 04:46.000]  we managed to get the live show going tonight.
[04:46.000 --> 04:51.000]  All right, there's a couple things I would like to bring up in the manner of news.
[04:51.000 --> 04:55.000]  First and foremost, CNN has finally canceled Piers the Moron Morgan.
[04:55.000 --> 05:00.000]  Send his butt back to England and let him piss, moan, and whine
[05:00.000 --> 05:06.000]  about the lack of guns or plethora of guns that only the government over there has
[05:06.000 --> 05:08.000]  instead of the people.
[05:08.000 --> 05:11.000]  But he isn't going to be doing it on American air anymore, at least.
[05:11.000 --> 05:14.000]  So let's all applaud that little accomplishment.
[05:14.000 --> 05:16.000]  CNN saw the light of the day.
[05:16.000 --> 05:20.000]  They're not going to manage to sway public opinion through this guy.
[05:20.000 --> 05:26.000]  Now, on the bad news front, Obamacare is currently turning the ICU
[05:26.000 --> 05:32.000]  and emergency care into a DMV line fest of all kinds.
[05:32.000 --> 05:36.000]  Of course, according to Nancy Pelosi, that's a good thing.
[05:36.000 --> 05:41.000]  Not only will it cost you jobs so that you have more social time,
[05:41.000 --> 05:44.000]  but while you're waiting in these long emergency room lines,
[05:44.000 --> 05:47.000]  you'll have plenty of time to make new friends.
[05:47.000 --> 05:52.000]  These are the people you've elected and or follow as your leaders.
[05:52.000 --> 05:59.000]  On top of that, on the Facebook page, I had some woman that I have no clue who she is.
[05:59.000 --> 06:02.000]  Obviously, she's friends of some friend that I've got on there
[06:02.000 --> 06:07.000]  because she sent me a private message asking me to take down an Obama meme
[06:07.000 --> 06:13.000]  that I had up there that basically just shows a pie chart of how many times
[06:13.000 --> 06:17.000]  or what percentage of Obama's day is actually comprised of lying,
[06:17.000 --> 06:20.000]  covering up the lies, and blah, blah, blah.
[06:20.000 --> 06:23.000]  And she sent me a message asking me to take it down.
[06:23.000 --> 06:27.000]  And one of her little challenges to my doing that is,
[06:27.000 --> 06:32.000]  who are you and what right do you have to call the president a liar?
[06:32.000 --> 06:36.000]  Well, my response straight up was this.
[06:36.000 --> 06:41.000]  I'm a Texan. I'm an American. I was born here. I live here.
[06:41.000 --> 06:46.000]  What other right do I even need? That's it.
[06:46.000 --> 06:51.000]  That just goes to show you, however, the mindset of those that support him actually have.
[06:51.000 --> 07:00.000]  And then she had the mind of asking or saying that I lacked discernment of reality
[07:00.000 --> 07:04.000]  because I was willing to challenge Obama and she was not.
[07:04.000 --> 07:07.000]  Obviously, one of us is sliding off the crazy train,
[07:07.000 --> 07:13.000]  but I'm not traveling that train or using that ticket, so I'll let her claim that one.
[07:13.000 --> 07:19.000]  But I did pull a little thing out of Jack Nicholson's lines in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest,
[07:19.000 --> 07:24.000]  or I'm sorry, maybe it was As Good as It Gets, something like that.
[07:24.000 --> 07:25.000]  I forget which one it was.
[07:25.000 --> 07:28.000]  But anyway, in one of his movies, he tells this lady, he says,
[07:28.000 --> 07:31.000]  go sell crazy someplace else. We're all full up here.
[07:31.000 --> 07:35.000]  And that's basically how I ended the conversation with this lady.
[07:35.000 --> 07:37.000]  Now, that's the fun part of the evening.
[07:37.000 --> 07:40.000]  Now let's start with one that I haven't really been relishing,
[07:40.000 --> 07:43.000]  but I'm going to have to do whether I like it or not.
[07:43.000 --> 07:52.000]  And this has to do with some advice that has been handed out regarding traffic stops that I've got to address.
[07:52.000 --> 07:56.000]  I can't leave out there where it is.
[07:56.000 --> 08:01.000]  I'm going to set a scenario up for you, and I want you to think about this real hard
[08:01.000 --> 08:08.000]  and come up with the answer that to some should be rather obvious.
[08:08.000 --> 08:12.000]  It's 1030 at night.
[08:12.000 --> 08:18.000]  You've been pulled over by some local law enforcement officer that you have yet to be able to identify
[08:18.000 --> 08:21.000]  because you can't see them until they approach your window.
[08:21.000 --> 08:27.000]  And even then, you may not be able to see them clear enough to identify what agency they're with.
[08:27.000 --> 08:33.000]  They already approach your car under the supposition that you are a threat to their life,
[08:33.000 --> 08:38.000]  that you are the enemy, and that if you so much as make a wrong move,
[08:38.000 --> 08:43.000]  they're going to plug you first and worry about the consequences later.
[08:43.000 --> 08:48.000]  And when they walk up to your window and knock on it,
[08:48.000 --> 08:58.000]  one of the first things that comes out of your mouth to this officer is, is your gun loaded?
[08:58.000 --> 09:03.000]  Now, as that officer approaching that car at that time of night under those conditions
[09:03.000 --> 09:07.000]  with the mindset that I just described,
[09:07.000 --> 09:14.000]  what is going to be the thoughts that flash through your mind when your perpetrator
[09:14.000 --> 09:20.000]  starts asking about whether or not your gun is loaded?
[09:20.000 --> 09:25.000]  What is going to become, as the officer, your first concern
[09:25.000 --> 09:29.000]  and your first series of questions in the back of your brain about
[09:29.000 --> 09:35.000]  why is this individual asking about my gun?
[09:35.000 --> 09:37.000]  Now, I'm going to let you all mull that over for a little bit,
[09:37.000 --> 09:40.000]  and I'm going to take this down somewhere else.
[09:40.000 --> 09:47.000]  But the phone lines are open, by the way, 512-646-1984.
[09:47.000 --> 09:56.000]  But what I would like is for you to address that question with your answer when you call in.
[09:56.000 --> 09:58.000]  Now, if you've got something else, that's fine too.
[09:58.000 --> 10:02.000]  But if you're actually listening, I would like for you to address that
[10:02.000 --> 10:07.000]  and see if you can describe to me coherently and reasonably,
[10:07.000 --> 10:11.000]  let's not go off-tilt here, stick to the point.
[10:11.000 --> 10:14.000]  If you were that officer and you had a perp in a car
[10:14.000 --> 10:17.000]  asking you that question under those conditions,
[10:17.000 --> 10:23.000]  what would you think and how would you react?
[10:23.000 --> 10:27.000]  Now, hopefully by the time that answer dawns on you,
[10:27.000 --> 10:37.000]  you will realize why I am going to stand on the point of view of that is a very bad idea.
[10:37.000 --> 10:44.000]  But what I want you to do is to come up with a reason why it's a bad idea.
[10:44.000 --> 10:49.000]  Because one of the exercises that I'm trying to get everybody to understand in class is
[10:49.000 --> 10:54.000]  if you don't know what your rights are, you're not going to know when they're being violated,
[10:54.000 --> 10:58.000]  and you're not going to know what you give up when you do it.
[10:58.000 --> 11:02.000]  Well, just like you should know what your rights are,
[11:02.000 --> 11:11.000]  this officer believes that he has a certain authority and ability to do things
[11:11.000 --> 11:19.000]  that are beyond and above the power of the everyday citizen or person or individual or the people.
[11:19.000 --> 11:24.000]  He is special, not just special ed, but special.
[11:24.000 --> 11:28.000]  He has special rights and privileges because he wears a costume
[11:28.000 --> 11:36.000]  and a piece of metal on his chest that he thinks makes him 10 feet tall and bulletproof.
[11:36.000 --> 11:44.000]  And unfortunately, you have a government bureaucracy that makes him feel that entitlement
[11:44.000 --> 11:49.000]  by allowing him to get away with it day in and day out.
[11:49.000 --> 11:54.000]  Now, on top of that, one of the other things I want to talk about is I read a court opinion yesterday
[11:54.000 --> 11:58.000]  from the County Court at Law number one, Judge Phillips, the same judge that was handling the appeal
[11:58.000 --> 12:02.000]  in my case and is handling the appeal in my case,
[12:02.000 --> 12:09.000]  and it's regarding a case that was filed by someone using the Notting Transportation defense.
[12:09.000 --> 12:13.000]  Now, how well they did it, what paperwork they used, I don't know.
[12:13.000 --> 12:16.000]  I haven't seen what the individual filed in their case.
[12:16.000 --> 12:21.000]  All I saw was the order handed down by the judge on the appeal.
[12:21.000 --> 12:32.000]  But every single thing that was in Judge Phillips' order absolutely was incorrect as a matter of law.
[12:32.000 --> 12:36.000]  That is when and where he bothered to address the law.
[12:36.000 --> 12:41.000]  He took the context of specific things and ignored how they interrelate with other statute,
[12:41.000 --> 12:46.000]  which is extremely common when they want a particular outcome that suits their agenda
[12:46.000 --> 12:52.000]  versus the rights of the people and the actual law itself or the statute itself.
[12:52.000 --> 12:57.000]  And what I'm going to do is one of my students had a copy of the opinion.
[12:57.000 --> 13:03.000]  I'm going to get him to send it to me, and I'm going to go into it in detail one of these upcoming shows.
[13:03.000 --> 13:09.000]  I haven't got a copy of it yet, so I can't prepare it the way I want to do to go into it in order to rebut it.
[13:09.000 --> 13:20.000]  But the fact of the matter is this judge just basically declared what he wanted it to be and ignored the law on the subject matter.
[13:20.000 --> 13:29.000]  And folks, you need to understand that up until that level, the county court and the county court-at-law,
[13:29.000 --> 13:35.000]  they don't care and possibly beyond that, but we'll hope that that's not the case,
[13:35.000 --> 13:39.000]  at least for the time being until they prove otherwise.
[13:39.000 --> 13:45.000]  But most of the time, these courts are making the same mistake over and over and over again.
[13:45.000 --> 13:54.000]  Once there is a stare decisis opinion on a particular subject, they never revisit it again,
[13:54.000 --> 14:01.000]  even if it's challenged, if it will adversely affect the ruling they have in place.
[14:01.000 --> 14:08.000]  Now, considering that they are supposed to check the actual statute or law first
[14:08.000 --> 14:13.000]  to see whether or not the opinion they're relying on is still viable,
[14:13.000 --> 14:20.000]  I mean, what the heck do they have us jeopardize cases for if they're not going to do it?
[14:20.000 --> 14:26.000]  Because the cases that this judge was citing were based upon cases that are now invalid.
[14:26.000 --> 14:32.000]  He cited Shinzig versus State, and he's talking about Daniel Shinzig,
[14:32.000 --> 14:38.000]  and that case was based entirely upon Ex Parte Greenwood from 1958,
[14:38.000 --> 14:48.000]  which is dead in the water because all the statutes that both of them relied on were repealed in 1996.
[14:48.000 --> 14:57.000]  And Shinzig was decided in 2007, which is complete evidence of the fact that the appeals court
[14:57.000 --> 15:04.000]  and the prosecution never went back to read the statute and compare it to the stare decisis decision
[15:04.000 --> 15:09.000]  that is no longer valid.
[15:09.000 --> 15:14.000]  So where are these people keeping their brains?
[15:14.000 --> 15:19.000]  Because it's certainly not in their job, and it's certainly not in doing it properly.
[15:19.000 --> 15:21.000]  So where is it?
[15:21.000 --> 15:26.000]  Well, I think it's where their head is, and I won't even have to describe where it actually is,
[15:26.000 --> 15:30.000]  because all you got to do is read something that these morons write,
[15:30.000 --> 15:37.000]  and it becomes fairly obvious that their head's so far up their butt that you got to pop them sunlight.
[15:37.000 --> 15:46.000]  It's ridiculous the way that we've let these people twist our judicial system into the crap they've turned it into.
[15:46.000 --> 15:54.000]  Our judicial system now resembles 20 years' worth of Christmas lights thrown into the garage in a box.
[15:54.000 --> 16:02.000]  And believe me, that's a kind example, because the contortions you have to go through
[16:02.000 --> 16:09.000]  to unravel what should be a step-by-step, straightforward process specifically directed
[16:09.000 --> 16:16.000]  at not only ensuring justice is done, but that the rights of the accused is protected at all times
[16:16.000 --> 16:22.000]  is just completely done away with by the way they've arranged things.
[16:22.000 --> 16:24.000]  It's completely gone.
[16:24.000 --> 16:28.000]  The legislature thinks it can pass statutes that deprive you of a right.
[16:28.000 --> 16:33.000]  The courts think that because it's written into a statute, they could deprive you of the right.
[16:33.000 --> 16:36.000]  And so that's just the way they want to do it.
[16:36.000 --> 16:40.000]  Constitution and inherent protected rights be damned.
[16:40.000 --> 16:42.000]  And it's up to us to fix that.
[16:42.000 --> 16:44.000]  We just have to come up with a plan.
[16:44.000 --> 16:48.000]  I'm going to cover a little bit about what I'm saying we need to do with that on the other side.
[16:48.000 --> 16:49.000]  So y'all hang in there.
[16:49.000 --> 16:53.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:53.000 --> 16:56.000]  Y'all start getting up on the board, because I won't be long in this next segment.
[16:56.000 --> 17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.000 --> 17:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.000 --> 17:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.000 --> 17:22.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[17:22.000 --> 17:26.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:26.000 --> 17:32.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:32.000 --> 17:36.000]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor,
[17:36.000 --> 17:40.000]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:40.000 --> 17:48.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:48.000 --> 17:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:52.000 --> 17:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:59.000 --> 18:01.000]  Order now.
[18:01.000 --> 18:06.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:06.000 --> 18:10.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:10.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:21.000 --> 18:27.000]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:27.000 --> 18:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:50.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 19:01.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:31.000 --> 19:38.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[19:38.000 --> 19:46.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, call in number 512-646-1984.
[19:46.000 --> 19:56.000]  Okay, now in relation to that situation on the side of the road, I would love to hear what your comments are on this
[19:56.000 --> 20:02.000]  and what you think the officer is thinking when you ask that sort of question in that circumstance,
[20:02.000 --> 20:09.000]  because I guarantee you that's something you don't want to put him in the mindset of.
[20:09.000 --> 20:12.000]  But let's see what the rest of you think here.
[20:12.000 --> 20:15.000]  Right now, I'm going to go to Rob in Illinois.
[20:15.000 --> 20:17.000]  I need some more folks up here, though.
[20:17.000 --> 20:19.000]  He's the only one I got, so let's get to calling.
[20:19.000 --> 20:21.000]  All right, Rob, what can we do for you?
[20:21.000 --> 20:22.000]  Hello, Eddie.
[20:22.000 --> 20:24.000]  I just have two real fast things here.
[20:24.000 --> 20:28.000]  I heard you say earlier about CNN dropping Piers Morgan.
[20:28.000 --> 20:33.000]  I was on a call the other night, and I didn't get all the numbers correct,
[20:33.000 --> 20:40.000]  but something like in the range of there's been like a 200 percent increase in gun sales in the past 5 to 10 years,
[20:40.000 --> 20:44.000]  and gun violence has gone down on average 44 percent.
[20:44.000 --> 20:46.000]  So the numbers are out there.
[20:46.000 --> 20:47.000]  It's proof.
[20:47.000 --> 20:49.000]  I mean, but these people will never talk about that.
[20:49.000 --> 20:56.000]  No, well, their agenda doesn't match up with that type of actual fact.
[20:56.000 --> 20:58.000]  Yeah, definitely facts.
[20:58.000 --> 21:05.000]  Yeah, but regarding the question I was asking regarding the officer on the side of the road under those conditions,
[21:05.000 --> 21:07.000]  what do you think he's thinking?
[21:07.000 --> 21:13.000]  He's probably never encountered a situation like that before.
[21:13.000 --> 21:17.000]  And, you know, we're talking about people with 100 IQ or less.
[21:17.000 --> 21:19.000]  Now, wait a minute, you're in Illinois,
[21:19.000 --> 21:27.000]  and you think if you go ask one of those Illinois cops at 1030 at night on the side of the road in the secluded area if his gun's loaded,
[21:27.000 --> 21:30.000]  what do you think his reaction is going to be?
[21:30.000 --> 21:33.000]  He's going to be quite curious as to why you're asking that question.
[21:33.000 --> 21:38.000]  Yeah, but how do you think he's going to go about asking you that question?
[21:38.000 --> 21:40.000]  Well, run the scenario past us.
[21:40.000 --> 21:42.000]  I mean, did he pull you over?
[21:42.000 --> 21:43.000]  Yeah, he pulled you over.
[21:43.000 --> 21:45.000]  You don't know what kind of cop you're talking to yet.
[21:45.000 --> 21:48.000]  He hasn't got up where you can see him through the bright lights.
[21:48.000 --> 21:55.000]  But when he does get up to your window, the first thing out of your mouth is, is that gun loaded?
[21:55.000 --> 21:57.000]  Yeah.
[21:57.000 --> 22:02.000]  And he's already got the mindset that this person could be trying to kill me.
[22:02.000 --> 22:05.000]  This person is a criminal in my book right now,
[22:05.000 --> 22:09.000]  and I've got to be very careful because they probably want to blow my head off.
[22:09.000 --> 22:16.000]  Yeah, I would say that the person pulling you over would probably be on edge,
[22:16.000 --> 22:19.000]  would be on full alert at that point in time.
[22:19.000 --> 22:21.000]  They generally are when they pull you over,
[22:21.000 --> 22:24.000]  but the important aspect here is when you ask that question,
[22:24.000 --> 22:28.000]  what's going through his mind in response to it?
[22:28.000 --> 22:35.000]  You're putting yourself into a situation you don't want to be in, generally speaking.
[22:35.000 --> 22:41.000]  So he could draw a lot of conclusions from that, but probably not any good ones.
[22:41.000 --> 22:42.000]  Okay.
[22:42.000 --> 22:46.000]  So that would probably put you in a light that you don't want to be in.
[22:46.000 --> 22:47.000]  All right.
[22:47.000 --> 22:48.000]  Well.
[22:48.000 --> 22:50.000]  If I can just generalize it.
[22:50.000 --> 22:51.000]  Well, that's it.
[22:51.000 --> 22:52.000]  However you want to answer it.
[22:52.000 --> 22:54.000]  I'm not trying to put words in anybody's mouth.
[22:54.000 --> 22:56.000]  I'm just trying to make sure they understand the situation
[22:56.000 --> 23:00.000]  and see what they think the officer might be thinking.
[23:00.000 --> 23:01.000]  All right.
[23:01.000 --> 23:02.000]  Anything else?
[23:02.000 --> 23:03.000]  Yeah, I do.
[23:03.000 --> 23:05.000]  I have an email if I could put it out there,
[23:05.000 --> 23:08.000]  because I was still trying to get a hold of that guy, Brian, if it's okay with you.
[23:08.000 --> 23:09.000]  Sure.
[23:09.000 --> 23:10.000]  If Brian is out there.
[23:10.000 --> 23:12.000]  Brian, this is Rob from Illinois.
[23:12.000 --> 23:15.000]  Actually, it's south side of Chicago in that area.
[23:15.000 --> 23:23.000]  My email is rob1802 at mail.com.
[23:23.000 --> 23:30.000]  Again, that is rob1802 at mail.com.
[23:30.000 --> 23:35.000]  So if you can get a hold of me, it would be great so we can network together.
[23:35.000 --> 23:36.000]  Okay.
[23:36.000 --> 23:38.000]  Are you going to, after all these people call in,
[23:38.000 --> 23:43.000]  are you going to give your theory or your insight on?
[23:43.000 --> 23:47.000]  Well, I'm sure mine will go out there a few times through the course of this discussion.
[23:47.000 --> 23:52.000]  But, yeah, I'm going to cover exactly what I would say is good
[23:52.000 --> 23:56.000]  or bad about the situation after that.
[23:56.000 --> 23:57.000]  Yeah.
[23:57.000 --> 23:59.000]  Oh, there is one other thing.
[23:59.000 --> 24:01.000]  The lady who turned me on to your show,
[24:01.000 --> 24:04.000]  I actually heard about you about four or five years ago,
[24:04.000 --> 24:08.000]  but this woman in the past year and a half really got on my case.
[24:08.000 --> 24:11.000]  She was from southeast Arizona, and that was Meredith,
[24:11.000 --> 24:13.000]  and she passed away about a month ago.
[24:13.000 --> 24:17.000]  So I just wanted to mention that, that I heard about your show through word of mouth,
[24:17.000 --> 24:20.000]  and it was thanks to her that.
[24:20.000 --> 24:23.000]  Well, I appreciate her for that, and I'm sorry to hear her passing.
[24:23.000 --> 24:24.000]  Yeah.
[24:24.000 --> 24:26.000]  So hats off to Meredith.
[24:26.000 --> 24:29.000]  And hats off to you too, Eddie, and Deborah,
[24:29.000 --> 24:33.000]  and what you guys are doing is phenomenal helping people out here.
[24:33.000 --> 24:34.000]  Well, appreciate it, Rob.
[24:34.000 --> 24:35.000]  Thank you.
[24:35.000 --> 24:36.000]  Sure, Eddie.
[24:36.000 --> 24:37.000]  All right.
[24:37.000 --> 24:39.000]  Anything else?
[24:39.000 --> 24:41.000]  No, that's about it.
[24:41.000 --> 24:42.000]  Okay.
[24:42.000 --> 24:43.000]  Then I'll get my next caller.
[24:43.000 --> 24:44.000]  Okay.
[24:44.000 --> 24:45.000]  Thanks, Eddie.
[24:45.000 --> 24:46.000]  All right.
[24:46.000 --> 24:47.000]  Bye-bye.
[24:47.000 --> 24:48.000]  All right.
[24:48.000 --> 24:49.000]  Now we're going to go to Andrew in Pennsylvania.
[24:49.000 --> 24:51.000]  Andrew, what can we do for you?
[24:51.000 --> 24:57.000]  Yeah, in regards to what the cop should be saying, if it was a good cop, he would say,
[24:57.000 --> 24:58.000]  well, of course my gun is loaded.
[24:58.000 --> 25:02.000]  I would be a lousy public servant if I didn't carry a loaded gun with me.
[25:02.000 --> 25:05.000]  No, I honestly think they'd be a much better public servant
[25:05.000 --> 25:08.000]  if they didn't have a loaded gun with them.
[25:08.000 --> 25:12.000]  Well, I mean, if their job is to serve and protect, doesn't it make sense?
[25:12.000 --> 25:16.000]  Hey, if they can do it in England, they can do it here.
[25:16.000 --> 25:21.000]  Right, but that's what should be going through the mind of a cop, thinking, well,
[25:21.000 --> 25:25.000]  if my gun isn't loaded, then I'm not doing my job because my job is to protect and serve,
[25:25.000 --> 25:26.000]  so I need a loaded gun.
[25:26.000 --> 25:28.000]  That's my answer.
[25:28.000 --> 25:30.000]  Okay.
[25:30.000 --> 25:31.000]  All right.
[25:31.000 --> 25:33.000]  Anything else?
[25:33.000 --> 25:34.000]  No.
[25:34.000 --> 25:35.000]  All right.
[25:35.000 --> 25:36.000]  Well, thanks for calling in.
[25:36.000 --> 25:37.000]  You're welcome.
[25:37.000 --> 25:38.000]  All right.
[25:38.000 --> 25:40.000]  Now we're going to go to Bruce in New York.
[25:40.000 --> 25:42.000]  Bruce, what can we do for you?
[25:42.000 --> 25:43.000]  Well, good evening, Eddie.
[25:43.000 --> 25:44.000]  Good evening.
[25:44.000 --> 25:49.000]  I have been looking at the Amanda Stevens issue there.
[25:49.000 --> 25:51.000]  Amanda Stevens?
[25:51.000 --> 25:52.000]  Yes.
[25:52.000 --> 25:55.000]  You're talking about the jaywalking young lady in Austin?
[25:55.000 --> 25:56.000]  I certainly am.
[25:56.000 --> 25:57.000]  Okay.
[25:57.000 --> 26:01.000]  Mr. Quasimodo is definitely aware of that.
[26:01.000 --> 26:06.000]  Anyways, Texas law sure leaves me baffled being from New York here.
[26:06.000 --> 26:07.000]  Okay.
[26:07.000 --> 26:09.000]  I see a lot of things that make really no sense to me.
[26:09.000 --> 26:13.000]  It seems that warrantless arrest is authorized.
[26:13.000 --> 26:18.000]  This is actually a misdemeanor, a class C misdemeanor,
[26:18.000 --> 26:20.000]  which is a fine-only misdemeanor.
[26:20.000 --> 26:23.000]  I mean, in New York, it can only be a crime if it's a misdemeanor.
[26:23.000 --> 26:24.000]  How does this work?
[26:24.000 --> 26:32.000]  Well, it's a crime here as well, but it's a fine-only offense.
[26:32.000 --> 26:34.000]  Now, they've defined it as a crime.
[26:34.000 --> 26:35.000]  It's not a real crime.
[26:35.000 --> 26:39.000]  It's just one they cooked up out of thin air to illegally tax us with,
[26:39.000 --> 26:41.000]  but that's what it is.
[26:41.000 --> 26:46.000]  But now let's also remember where the jaywalking statute is.
[26:46.000 --> 26:48.000]  Where did you find it?
[26:48.000 --> 26:50.000]  Well, I found it in the transportation code.
[26:50.000 --> 26:51.000]  That's correct.
[26:51.000 --> 26:58.000]  Now, let's think real hard about what kind of people operating under the
[26:58.000 --> 27:03.000]  transportation code could actually be guilty of jaywalking.
[27:03.000 --> 27:07.000]  Well, you beat me to my next question, which is how could she be jogging a
[27:07.000 --> 27:11.000]  commerce?
[27:11.000 --> 27:12.000]  Well, that's easy.
[27:12.000 --> 27:13.000]  She could be a paid marathon runner.
[27:13.000 --> 27:14.000]  Wow.
[27:14.000 --> 27:15.000]  No, I'm kidding.
[27:15.000 --> 27:18.000]  She'd have to be hauling something, a passenger or property, before she could
[27:18.000 --> 27:22.000]  be in commerce at all in relation to transportation.
[27:22.000 --> 27:27.000]  So this section 552.005 is actually a criminal statute, huh?
[27:27.000 --> 27:29.000]  Yes.
[27:29.000 --> 27:30.000]  Interesting.
[27:30.000 --> 27:33.000]  Well, now, like I say, that's how they've defined it.
[27:33.000 --> 27:38.000]  It's an administrative statute, but they're treating it as if it's criminal.
[27:38.000 --> 27:41.000]  So they're processing it using the rules of the criminal procedure.
[27:41.000 --> 27:42.000]  Correct.
[27:42.000 --> 27:46.000]  Well, they pretend to use the rules of criminal procedure.
[27:46.000 --> 27:50.000]  They ignore them when it suits them and will give them the advantage.
[27:50.000 --> 27:54.000]  Well, the way I read this, in Texas rules of criminal procedure, she'd be
[27:54.000 --> 27:56.000]  entitled to a jury trial.
[27:56.000 --> 27:59.000]  Sure, she's entitled to a jury trial.
[27:59.000 --> 28:02.000]  But she's also entitled to sue the living crop out of the cops.
[28:02.000 --> 28:03.000]  I would like to see that.
[28:03.000 --> 28:07.000]  I mean, this is obviously a revenue enhancement operation.
[28:07.000 --> 28:09.000]  Anyway, let's get back to my question to you.
[28:09.000 --> 28:15.000]  Who, under the transportation code, could conceivably commit the act of
[28:15.000 --> 28:17.000]  jaywalking?
[28:17.000 --> 28:21.000]  An operator, a driver, someone for hire?
[28:21.000 --> 28:24.000]  Well, explain how they would do it.
[28:24.000 --> 28:27.000]  Good question.
[28:27.000 --> 28:29.000]  Well, let's consider this.
[28:29.000 --> 28:32.000]  You have a delivery driver.
[28:32.000 --> 28:35.000]  The delivery driver parks on one side of the street to make a delivery on
[28:35.000 --> 28:39.000]  the other side of the street with his dolly loaded down or carrying his box
[28:39.000 --> 28:44.000]  or whatever, and he takes the straightest line from point A, his delivery
[28:44.000 --> 28:50.000]  vehicle, to point B, the delivery location, right across the street.
[28:50.000 --> 28:53.000]  Being in commerce, can he jaywalk?
[28:53.000 --> 28:55.000]  Certainly.
[28:55.000 --> 29:01.000]  But now everybody else that isn't in commerce, they can walk across the
[29:01.000 --> 29:06.000]  street liable for any harm they perpetrate and any accidents they cause,
[29:06.000 --> 29:12.000]  whether it be to themselves or anyone else, trying to avoid them and not be
[29:12.000 --> 29:14.000]  in commerce.
[29:14.000 --> 29:18.000]  Her first element of the crime is not satisfied.
[29:18.000 --> 29:20.000]  Correct.
[29:20.000 --> 29:25.000]  She was not engaged in transportation.
[29:25.000 --> 29:26.000]  Okay.
[29:26.000 --> 29:27.000]  Well, thanks for clearing it up.
[29:27.000 --> 29:30.000]  I can't believe that jaywalking would be criminal, but I'll just say he has
[29:30.000 --> 29:31.000]  his own little court.
[29:31.000 --> 29:35.000]  Well, believe me, this is the reason why I chose these types of areas of law,
[29:35.000 --> 29:39.000]  because this is where everybody's going to get sucked into it one way or the
[29:39.000 --> 29:47.000]  other, and this is where people need to know where it starts, and this is it.
[29:47.000 --> 29:48.000]  All right?
[29:48.000 --> 29:49.000]  Great.
[29:49.000 --> 29:50.000]  Thank you.
[29:50.000 --> 29:51.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[29:51.000 --> 29:52.000]  All right.
[29:52.000 --> 29:53.000]  Johnny, I'll see you on the board there.
[29:53.000 --> 29:54.000]  Hang on.
[29:54.000 --> 29:55.000]  I'll get you on the other side of the break.
[29:55.000 --> 29:57.000]  512-646-1984.
[29:57.000 --> 30:04.000]  We will be right back.
[30:04.000 --> 30:08.000]  In China, a toddler crawled out of a high-rise apartment window and was
[30:08.000 --> 30:11.000]  plunging to her death when a miracle happened.
[30:11.000 --> 30:12.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[30:12.000 --> 30:16.000]  In a moment, I'll be back to tell you how a quick-thinking stranger saved her
[30:16.000 --> 30:17.000]  life.
[30:17.000 --> 30:19.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:19.000 --> 30:23.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:23.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish
[30:27.000 --> 30:28.000]  too.
[30:28.000 --> 30:29.000]  So protect your rights.
[30:29.000 --> 30:33.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:33.000 --> 30:36.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[30:36.000 --> 30:40.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine
[30:40.000 --> 30:43.000]  alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:43.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:48.000]  It's every parent's nightmare.
[30:48.000 --> 30:51.000]  A two-year-old girl climbed out the window of her 10-story apartment in
[30:51.000 --> 30:55.000]  Hangzhou, China, and teetered on the ledge for several moments before her
[30:55.000 --> 30:56.000]  parents noticed.
[30:56.000 --> 31:01.000]  Their frantic screams alerted a passerby, 31-year-old Wu Juping, who looked
[31:01.000 --> 31:02.000]  up at the scene.
[31:02.000 --> 31:05.000]  She kicked off her heels and ran to the building just moments before the
[31:05.000 --> 31:08.000]  little girl lost her balance and fell.
[31:08.000 --> 31:12.000]  Juping stretched out her arms, felt a sharp pain, and passed out.
[31:12.000 --> 31:16.000]  When she awoke, she discovered she'd broken her left arm and saved a life.
[31:16.000 --> 31:20.000]  She'd caught the baby, who had nothing but a few bruises to show for her
[31:20.000 --> 31:21.000]  adventure.
[31:21.000 --> 31:25.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private
[31:25.000 --> 31:31.000]  search engine.
[31:31.000 --> 31:35.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of
[31:35.000 --> 31:36.000]  September 11.
[31:36.000 --> 31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.000 --> 31:42.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled
[31:42.000 --> 31:43.000]  demolition.
[31:43.000 --> 31:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:46.000 --> 31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders have died.
[31:49.000 --> 31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.000 --> 31:52.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:52.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.000 --> 31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.000 --> 31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.000 --> 32:02.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.000 --> 32:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:05.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the
[32:08.000 --> 32:10.000]  people are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to
[32:10.000 --> 32:12.000]  stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.000 --> 32:15.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the
[32:15.000 --> 32:18.000]  right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right
[32:18.000 --> 32:19.000]  to due process of law.
[32:19.000 --> 32:23.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to
[32:23.000 --> 32:25.000]  enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.000 --> 32:28.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:28.000 --> 32:31.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will
[32:31.000 --> 32:34.000]  help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the
[32:34.000 --> 32:35.000]  rule of law.
[32:35.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to
[32:38.000 --> 32:41.000]  ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas
[32:43.000 --> 32:46.000]  Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the
[32:46.000 --> 32:50.000]  original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful
[32:50.000 --> 32:51.000]  resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:53.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from
[32:53.000 --> 32:55.000]  ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 32:58.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all
[32:58.000 --> 33:02.000]  want and deserve.
[33:02.000 --> 33:12.000]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:12.000 --> 33:35.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[33:35.000 --> 33:40.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:40.000 --> 33:42.000]  We're going to go to Johnny in Texas.
[33:42.000 --> 33:44.000]  Johnny, what's up?
[33:44.000 --> 33:48.000]  Eddie, I wanted to give my two cents on your question, but before that,
[33:48.000 --> 33:52.000]  just briefly, I want to address the previous caller's question.
[33:52.000 --> 33:56.000]  It's entirely possible to be on foot and engaged in commerce.
[33:56.000 --> 34:01.000]  I mean, you can be a courier, you can be a property inspector, you know,
[34:01.000 --> 34:03.000]  something along those lines.
[34:03.000 --> 34:04.000]  There are people who get paid.
[34:04.000 --> 34:05.000]  Absolutely.
[34:05.000 --> 34:08.000]  For walking around downtown Fort Worth all day long to deliver packages
[34:08.000 --> 34:09.000]  and whatnot.
[34:09.000 --> 34:13.000]  Yeah, for instance, if the parking ticket agent crosses the street that way,
[34:13.000 --> 34:15.000]  they're jaywalking.
[34:15.000 --> 34:16.000]  That's absolutely right.
[34:16.000 --> 34:19.000]  You know, you can be a door-to-door salesman or anything like that,
[34:19.000 --> 34:23.000]  but outside of that, I don't think they have a way to stay.
[34:23.000 --> 34:26.000]  Well, I'd argue against a door-to-door salesman because his commerce doesn't
[34:26.000 --> 34:29.000]  involve the street, per se.
[34:29.000 --> 34:32.000]  His is actually conducted inside the home or at the front door,
[34:32.000 --> 34:35.000]  but not on the actual street, whereas the rest of them or everything they're
[34:35.000 --> 34:39.000]  doing involves the use of the street.
[34:39.000 --> 34:40.000]  Well, possibly.
[34:40.000 --> 34:43.000]  I know a lot of people who come to my door trying to sell me stuff all the
[34:43.000 --> 34:46.000]  time get paid for, you know, walking up and down door-to-door,
[34:46.000 --> 34:49.000]  and they'll go to one house and they'll cross the street and go to the next
[34:49.000 --> 34:51.000]  house and they'll cross the street and go to the next house.
[34:51.000 --> 34:53.000]  So, yeah, maybe there's a gray area there,
[34:53.000 --> 34:57.000]  but it is entirely possible to be on foot and engaged in commerce.
[34:57.000 --> 34:58.000]  Oh, I agree.
[34:58.000 --> 34:59.000]  I agree.
[34:59.000 --> 35:02.000]  I just didn't want to have to start making a list right there.
[35:02.000 --> 35:03.000]  Yeah.
[35:03.000 --> 35:09.000]  Now, as to your main question, I kind of want to address it on a couple of
[35:09.000 --> 35:10.000]  different levels.
[35:10.000 --> 35:14.000]  First of all, I agree that it is extremely dangerous, you know,
[35:14.000 --> 35:18.000]  to be asking a cop if his gun is loaded because I know how they're trained
[35:18.000 --> 35:22.000]  and I know how they're indoctrinated, and I know that as soon as someone asks
[35:22.000 --> 35:28.000]  them, is your gun loaded, their training is going to immediately, you know,
[35:28.000 --> 35:32.000]  prompt them to think, is they're going to take that as some kind of a
[35:32.000 --> 35:33.000]  challenge.
[35:33.000 --> 35:36.000]  Like maybe you have a gun and you can get to yours before they get to theirs
[35:36.000 --> 35:40.000]  or you otherwise would tend to do them some harm.
[35:40.000 --> 35:41.000]  So I think it's very dangerous.
[35:41.000 --> 35:48.000]  And I think particularly, and I hate to say this, and I hate to pull the race
[35:48.000 --> 35:52.000]  card, but, you know, race does play into it as well.
[35:52.000 --> 35:56.000]  I think it's dangerous for a Caucasian to be asking a cop that question.
[35:56.000 --> 36:02.000]  But I have a friend who is African American and he deals with the cops very
[36:02.000 --> 36:04.000]  much in the same way that I do.
[36:04.000 --> 36:09.000]  And every single time the reaction that he gets is much more violent,
[36:09.000 --> 36:12.000]  much more assertive.
[36:12.000 --> 36:13.000]  Oh, absolutely.
[36:13.000 --> 36:16.000]  I mean, I'd agree with you that race will play a part in it.
[36:16.000 --> 36:19.000]  And it's not just a black guy asking a white cop.
[36:19.000 --> 36:23.000]  If a white guy in a car asks a black cop that, the result is going to be
[36:23.000 --> 36:25.000]  exactly the same but in opposite direction.
[36:25.000 --> 36:27.000]  Yes, absolutely, absolutely.
[36:27.000 --> 36:32.000]  And the other aspect of it is, I mean, I kind of understand that people who
[36:32.000 --> 36:36.000]  would ask the question, you know, or trying to establish that, you know,
[36:36.000 --> 36:41.000]  that there was a threat involved, you know, to be used in criminal
[36:41.000 --> 36:42.000]  charges later.
[36:42.000 --> 36:44.000]  Yeah, but you can absolutely do that in the courtroom.
[36:44.000 --> 36:48.000]  Taking that risk on the side of the road is not the place to be doing it.
[36:48.000 --> 36:50.000]  Well, and that's where I was kind of going with it.
[36:50.000 --> 36:54.000]  I think regardless of the danger involved with it, it's kind of pointless
[36:54.000 --> 37:00.000]  to ask the question anyway because, you know, if a cop has a gun strapped to
[37:00.000 --> 37:03.000]  his hip, it's pretty safe to assume that it's loaded.
[37:03.000 --> 37:06.000]  And I don't think anybody's going to argue to the contrary.
[37:06.000 --> 37:09.000]  And I think any cop who would go into a courtroom and say, well, yeah,
[37:09.000 --> 37:13.000]  I had a gun on my hip but it wasn't loaded is an idiot.
[37:13.000 --> 37:14.000]  Yeah, well, I mean, I agree with that.
[37:14.000 --> 37:16.000]  We had that discussion before the show started.
[37:16.000 --> 37:20.000]  Unless the individual standing there is Don Knotts, don't be asking that
[37:20.000 --> 37:21.000]  question.
[37:21.000 --> 37:26.000]  Yeah, I mean, you just, you know, I just don't see the point of asking it.
[37:26.000 --> 37:30.000]  I mean, it's just assume that if the guy's wearing a gun, it is loaded.
[37:30.000 --> 37:35.000]  Yeah, I mean, you can always gain the testify on the record in court later
[37:35.000 --> 37:36.000]  that, yeah, it was loaded at the time.
[37:36.000 --> 37:37.000]  Okay, great.
[37:37.000 --> 37:38.000]  It's all I need to know.
[37:38.000 --> 37:41.000]  Yeah, yeah, and a non-confrontational setting where he's not going to,
[37:41.000 --> 37:44.000]  probably not even going to be wearing his gun in the courtroom.
[37:44.000 --> 37:47.000]  Yep, and you can always be asserted.
[37:47.000 --> 37:50.000]  I had the presumption that the gun was loaded, that he was willing to use it
[37:50.000 --> 37:52.000]  and he was willing to kill me with it.
[37:52.000 --> 37:56.000]  Whether I did anything or not to deserve it, he was willing to do it.
[37:56.000 --> 37:58.000]  Yep, absolutely.
[37:58.000 --> 38:00.000]  So those are just kind of my thoughts on it.
[38:00.000 --> 38:03.000]  All right, well, I appreciate the call in and the shout out.
[38:03.000 --> 38:04.000]  All right, thanks, Eddie.
[38:04.000 --> 38:06.000]  All right, have a good night.
[38:06.000 --> 38:10.000]  All right, now we're going to go to Sam in North Dakota.
[38:10.000 --> 38:12.000]  Sam, what can we do for you?
[38:12.000 --> 38:16.000]  Oh, I have a question about the implementing regulation that's in the
[38:16.000 --> 38:18.000]  administrative code.
[38:18.000 --> 38:20.000]  Who's administrative code?
[38:20.000 --> 38:22.000]  Oh, it's the North Dakota one.
[38:22.000 --> 38:23.000]  Okay.
[38:23.000 --> 38:24.000]  When they say...
[38:24.000 --> 38:27.000]  Now, you realize I haven't read the North Dakota administrative code, right?
[38:27.000 --> 38:28.000]  Okay.
[38:28.000 --> 38:32.000]  Well, I was just wondering in the transportation up here,
[38:32.000 --> 38:36.000]  it's called the sentry code, but anyway, each one of them,
[38:36.000 --> 38:40.000]  the way I understand it, is supposed to have a corresponding implementing
[38:40.000 --> 38:43.000]  regulation, is that right or not?
[38:43.000 --> 38:51.000]  Well, the implementing regulation is whatever act is created to facilitate
[38:51.000 --> 38:55.000]  the actual bill passed by the legislature.
[38:55.000 --> 38:57.000]  Okay.
[38:57.000 --> 39:00.000]  So necessarily if you're cited with something, they don't have to
[39:00.000 --> 39:04.000]  necessarily cite that administrative code regulation?
[39:04.000 --> 39:08.000]  None of them will cite the administrative code as being the reason for it.
[39:08.000 --> 39:11.000]  They'll cite the governing code itself and act like the administrative code
[39:11.000 --> 39:13.000]  has no relationship.
[39:13.000 --> 39:14.000]  Okay.
[39:14.000 --> 39:18.000]  Because if the administrative code controls, then that changes the
[39:18.000 --> 39:20.000]  paradigm of where they can go.
[39:20.000 --> 39:22.000]  Okay.
[39:22.000 --> 39:26.000]  But I noticed in the index of the administrative code, they cite the
[39:26.000 --> 39:29.000]  sentry code and they implement, you know, the corresponding implementing
[39:29.000 --> 39:33.000]  regulation, but the one for the ones where there's a crime or they cite
[39:33.000 --> 39:38.000]  crimes or whatever with jail or fines, there's no implementing regulation
[39:38.000 --> 39:40.000]  there.
[39:40.000 --> 39:48.000]  Well, there are several statutes that may not have an offense listed unless
[39:48.000 --> 39:51.000]  they're trying to actually say that that violation of that section is an
[39:51.000 --> 39:53.000]  offense.
[39:53.000 --> 39:56.000]  There are several statutes in Texas that try to charge you criminally under,
[39:56.000 --> 40:00.000]  but nowhere does it actually say a person commits an offense if.
[40:00.000 --> 40:01.000]  Okay.
[40:01.000 --> 40:03.000]  I see.
[40:03.000 --> 40:08.000]  But in order for them to actually create an offense, it has to say that.
[40:08.000 --> 40:09.000]  Okay.
[40:09.000 --> 40:12.000]  The statutes do, I mean, they do say that.
[40:12.000 --> 40:14.000]  Well, some do.
[40:14.000 --> 40:19.000]  Like I say, here in Texas, for instance, there is absolutely no regulation
[40:19.000 --> 40:27.000]  that makes it a crime to not have a sticker for inspection on your car.
[40:27.000 --> 40:30.000]  There is no crime for not having the sticker.
[40:30.000 --> 40:37.000]  The crime exists only if the one you are displaying shows that it's expired.
[40:37.000 --> 40:39.000]  Okay.
[40:39.000 --> 40:44.000]  So but they always try to charge you for not having an inspection sticker,
[40:44.000 --> 40:47.000]  and there's no such offense.
[40:47.000 --> 40:48.000]  Okay.
[40:48.000 --> 40:53.000]  So the Administrative Procedures Act, does it require the statute to have a
[40:53.000 --> 40:55.000]  corresponding implementing regulation?
[40:55.000 --> 41:00.000]  The statute is the corresponding implementing regulation.
[41:00.000 --> 41:01.000]  Yeah.
[41:01.000 --> 41:03.000]  Does it?
[41:03.000 --> 41:06.000]  No, it is.
[41:06.000 --> 41:11.000]  The statute is the implementing regulation of the actual bill passed by
[41:11.000 --> 41:13.000]  the legislature.
[41:13.000 --> 41:17.000]  The bill is the law, not the statute.
[41:17.000 --> 41:23.000]  The statute is the interpretation of that law by the regulatory agency that
[41:23.000 --> 41:26.000]  has to enforce that law.
[41:26.000 --> 41:30.000]  Does the agency have to have an implementing regulation pointing out who
[41:30.000 --> 41:35.000]  specifically and what kind of activities prohibited?
[41:35.000 --> 41:40.000]  The statutes are the implementing regulations.
[41:40.000 --> 41:41.000]  Okay.
[41:41.000 --> 41:42.000]  That's okay.
[41:42.000 --> 41:43.000]  That's how they do that.
[41:43.000 --> 41:45.000]  I see.
[41:45.000 --> 41:49.000]  So the style and enacting clause goes way back to whenever it was enacted.
[41:49.000 --> 41:50.000]  That stays with that.
[41:50.000 --> 41:51.000]  Okay.
[41:51.000 --> 41:52.000]  Well, here's the difference.
[41:52.000 --> 41:57.000]  If you will notice, most statutes don't have the enacting clause.
[41:57.000 --> 41:59.000]  Only the bill does.
[41:59.000 --> 42:01.000]  Yeah.
[42:01.000 --> 42:08.000]  That tells you right off the bat the statute is not a law.
[42:08.000 --> 42:09.000]  Got it?
[42:09.000 --> 42:11.000]  When they cite you with the statute, they're not really citing you with the
[42:11.000 --> 42:13.000]  law, then is that an argument to make?
[42:13.000 --> 42:14.000]  Absolutely.
[42:14.000 --> 42:19.000]  If they're saying that you violated a law, then they have to prove that.
[42:19.000 --> 42:23.000]  If you're not allowed to bring up the statute in court as evidence of the
[42:23.000 --> 42:26.000]  law, neither can they.
[42:26.000 --> 42:31.000]  So when they start arguing that you violated such and such statute, you would
[42:31.000 --> 42:32.000]  say objection.
[42:32.000 --> 42:37.000]  The state cannot prove with that argument that any law was broken.
[42:37.000 --> 42:40.000]  No law was violated according to them.
[42:40.000 --> 42:45.000]  They're talking about a regulation, which they haven't proved actually
[42:45.000 --> 42:48.000]  represents the underlying law.
[42:48.000 --> 42:53.000]  Do they have to bring that in the complaint?
[42:53.000 --> 42:57.000]  Well, that depends upon what the courts in your state have said about whether
[42:57.000 --> 42:59.000]  or not specifying the law is.
[42:59.000 --> 43:03.000]  But if they're going to comply with due process, where they're required to
[43:03.000 --> 43:07.000]  give you notice of the violation, common sense says, yeah, they have to tell
[43:07.000 --> 43:12.000]  you specifically what law they're trying to charge you with.
[43:12.000 --> 43:15.000]  But they're not charging you with a law.
[43:15.000 --> 43:20.000]  They're charging you with a statute.
[43:20.000 --> 43:24.000]  So that's a good subject matter jurisdiction thing to argue then.
[43:24.000 --> 43:27.000]  Well, yeah, because state never proves standing.
[43:27.000 --> 43:33.000]  State never proved a law was broken.
[43:33.000 --> 43:34.000]  Okay.
[43:34.000 --> 43:37.000]  Well, I guess that answers my question then.
[43:37.000 --> 43:38.000]  Okay.
[43:38.000 --> 43:39.000]  All right.
[43:39.000 --> 43:40.000]  Appreciate you calling in, Sam.
[43:40.000 --> 43:41.000]  Thank you.
[43:41.000 --> 43:42.000]  All right.
[43:42.000 --> 43:43.000]  Okay.
[43:43.000 --> 43:44.000]  We're about to go to breaks.
[43:44.000 --> 43:45.000]  Riley, Robert, I see you there.
[43:45.000 --> 43:46.000]  So y'all hang on.
[43:46.000 --> 43:51.000]  Need some more callers after these two folks, 512-646-1984.
[43:51.000 --> 43:52.000]  Give us a call.
[43:52.000 --> 44:01.000]  We will be right back.
[44:01.000 --> 44:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.000 --> 44:08.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable,
[44:08.000 --> 44:13.000]  easy to understand, poor CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[44:13.000 --> 44:15.000]  step by step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:32.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case
[44:32.000 --> 44:34.000]  winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[44:39.000 --> 44:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:48.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil
[44:48.000 --> 44:52.000]  cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 44:57.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free,
[44:57.000 --> 45:03.000]  866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.000 --> 45:04.000]  Hello.
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com,
[45:07.000 --> 45:11.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street
[45:11.000 --> 45:15.000]  Sweet D here in Austin, Texas, behind Brave New Books and Chase Bank to see all
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.000 --> 45:22.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in
[45:22.000 --> 45:23.000]  alternative medicine.
[45:23.000 --> 45:26.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our
[45:26.000 --> 45:30.000]  Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver
[45:30.000 --> 45:31.000]  and gold.
[45:31.000 --> 45:38.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.000 --> 45:44.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.000 --> 45:48.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:48.000 --> 46:15.000]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:15.000 --> 46:22.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:22.000 --> 46:24.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[46:24.000 --> 46:27.000]  Now we're going to go to Riley in Colorado.
[46:27.000 --> 46:29.000]  Riley, what can we do for you?
[46:29.000 --> 46:31.000]  Hey, Eddie, how are you doing?
[46:31.000 --> 46:33.000]  Well, so far so grand.
[46:33.000 --> 46:34.000]  That's good.
[46:34.000 --> 46:39.000]  I had a question trying to help out a friend here on a traffic citation.
[46:39.000 --> 46:40.000]  Okay.
[46:40.000 --> 46:48.000]  It gets kind of hairy because that person handed over a driver's license.
[46:48.000 --> 46:52.000]  So that pretty well gets rid of that argument.
[46:52.000 --> 46:56.000]  As far as not in transportation, yes, it does.
[46:56.000 --> 46:57.000]  Yeah.
[46:57.000 --> 47:03.000]  So I was wondering if you had any other ideas that one could argue against
[47:03.000 --> 47:06.000]  something like that.
[47:06.000 --> 47:11.000]  Well, at that point, you're pretty much left with going to merits because
[47:11.000 --> 47:14.000]  here's how this is going to play out.
[47:14.000 --> 47:18.000]  Even if you try to stick with the not in transportation argument and the
[47:18.000 --> 47:22.000]  prosecutor asks the correct questions to the officer or to you if you take the
[47:22.000 --> 47:27.000]  stand, did you or did you not hand over a license to the officer?
[47:27.000 --> 47:30.000]  Now, of course, that's a double-edged question, so you don't really have to
[47:30.000 --> 47:35.000]  answer that one, but let's just say, did you hand the officer a license?
[47:35.000 --> 47:41.000]  The moment you testify yes and the appeals court sees that, it's a done deal.
[47:41.000 --> 47:42.000]  Yeah.
[47:42.000 --> 47:44.000]  Okay.
[47:44.000 --> 47:47.000]  So even if you went with the not in transportation defense, they're going to
[47:47.000 --> 47:50.000]  say then why did you produce a license associated with the activity if it
[47:50.000 --> 47:52.000]  didn't matter?
[47:52.000 --> 47:55.000]  I had this discussion in class yesterday with a guy who wasn't getting it
[47:55.000 --> 47:56.000]  right off the bat.
[47:56.000 --> 47:59.000]  It took a little while for it to sink in because he kept arguing, the cop
[47:59.000 --> 48:04.000]  never told me that I was in commerce or that I was proving I was in commerce.
[48:04.000 --> 48:06.000]  Yes, he did.
[48:06.000 --> 48:10.000]  The moment he said license registration and proof of financial responsibility,
[48:10.000 --> 48:12.000]  that's exactly what he was telling me.
[48:12.000 --> 48:17.000]  And the moment you handed it over, you agreed that that's exactly what you
[48:17.000 --> 48:18.000]  were doing.
[48:18.000 --> 48:19.000]  Yeah.
[48:19.000 --> 48:23.000]  The fact that you don't understand the legalese he's speaking isn't the
[48:23.000 --> 48:24.000]  officer's fault.
[48:24.000 --> 48:28.000]  You're the one that's presumed to understand everything that is being done
[48:28.000 --> 48:33.000]  when you interact with a government agent, regardless of what level or who
[48:33.000 --> 48:36.000]  they represent.
[48:36.000 --> 48:41.000]  You know, actually, could you argue with the Philip Miranda?
[48:41.000 --> 48:43.000]  Do you think that would get anywhere?
[48:43.000 --> 48:45.000]  Argue Miranda with who?
[48:45.000 --> 48:51.000]  Well, there was no rights being read, so pretty much all of that could be.
[48:51.000 --> 48:54.000]  Well, again, if the officer was required to read you your rights once you
[48:54.000 --> 48:58.000]  were placed under arrest, which here in Texas, that's exactly what a traffic
[48:58.000 --> 49:02.000]  stop is, is a custodial arrest according to the case of Aziz v. State,
[49:02.000 --> 49:05.000]  that it is a custodial arrest.
[49:05.000 --> 49:09.000]  And because it's a custodial arrest, the rest of the code of criminal
[49:09.000 --> 49:15.000]  procedure, specifically 38.22 in hours, says that officer must read a person
[49:15.000 --> 49:21.000]  their rights or any evidence discovered by that officer during that custodial
[49:21.000 --> 49:24.000]  arrest interrogation is inadmissible.
[49:24.000 --> 49:29.000]  Now, once again, they completely ignore the law here and they do everywhere
[49:29.000 --> 49:34.000]  else as to criminal due process and the rights of the accused, because if they
[49:34.000 --> 49:41.000]  honored your rights, they would never get your money.
[49:41.000 --> 49:49.000]  So this is why you must get the record correct for the appellate court.
[49:49.000 --> 49:52.000]  Okay.
[49:52.000 --> 49:58.000]  So even the one thing that you can argue, despite the fact that you were not
[49:58.000 --> 50:03.000]  engaged in transportation, is if the state fails to ask the questions necessary
[50:03.000 --> 50:10.000]  to prove standing, then they have no case at all.
[50:10.000 --> 50:13.000]  And they lack jurisdiction to do anything.
[50:13.000 --> 50:20.000]  So you can go after standing if they don't bother to ask those questions and
[50:20.000 --> 50:22.000]  see if that works.
[50:22.000 --> 50:26.000]  But if you produce it, odds are they're going to ask the questions that confirm
[50:26.000 --> 50:30.000]  that you did and standing has been proven.
[50:30.000 --> 50:32.000]  Uh-huh.
[50:32.000 --> 50:35.000]  Okay.
[50:35.000 --> 50:36.000]  All righty.
[50:36.000 --> 50:38.000]  Well, that's what I wanted to know.
[50:38.000 --> 50:39.000]  Okay.
[50:39.000 --> 50:40.000]  Well, I appreciate it.
[50:40.000 --> 50:41.000]  All right.
[50:41.000 --> 50:42.000]  Thank you very much for calling in.
[50:42.000 --> 50:43.000]  You bet.
[50:43.000 --> 50:44.000]  See you.
[50:44.000 --> 50:45.000]  All right.
[50:45.000 --> 50:46.000]  Okay.
[50:46.000 --> 50:47.000]  Now we're going to go to Robert in Texas.
[50:47.000 --> 50:49.000]  Robert, what can we do for you?
[50:49.000 --> 50:51.000]  Can you hear me okay?
[50:51.000 --> 50:52.000]  So far.
[50:52.000 --> 50:58.000]  Okay, well, in regards to your question, I've actually done that, but not late
[50:58.000 --> 51:02.000]  night on the side of the road, but me and my son went down to the city
[51:02.000 --> 51:07.000]  courthouse in Canyon once asking for records, and they brought out the police.
[51:07.000 --> 51:13.000]  And you threatened me and my son with arrest, but, you know, the police had
[51:13.000 --> 51:17.000]  their hands on the guns, and I asked them, you know, if their guns were loaded,
[51:17.000 --> 51:20.000]  they said yes, and I told them, I said, well, take your hands off your guns
[51:20.000 --> 51:24.000]  because you're making me nervous and I feel threatened, to with one of the
[51:24.000 --> 51:31.000]  policemen that had his hand on his gun quickly crossed his arms.
[51:31.000 --> 51:34.000]  Yeah, but what time of day was it and where were you?
[51:34.000 --> 51:36.000]  I was at the city hall.
[51:36.000 --> 51:37.000]  Yeah.
[51:37.000 --> 51:38.000]  See, that's the thing right there.
[51:38.000 --> 51:40.000]  The setting means an awful lot.
[51:40.000 --> 51:41.000]  Oh, yeah, yeah.
[51:41.000 --> 51:47.000]  But anyway, also, my wife the other day, she was going to work, and she was
[51:47.000 --> 51:50.000]  traveling to work, and she turns the corner.
[51:50.000 --> 51:56.000]  She's a real cautious, I don't want to say driving, you know, traveler, but
[51:56.000 --> 51:58.000]  she considers herself a driver.
[51:58.000 --> 52:02.000]  But anyway, she turns the corner real cautious, real slow like she always
[52:02.000 --> 52:07.000]  does, and this policeman pulls her over, and he says, the reason I pulled you
[52:07.000 --> 52:10.000]  over is because you made a wide right turn.
[52:10.000 --> 52:15.000]  Now, I'm unaware that there's a statute or law against a wide right turn, and,
[52:15.000 --> 52:20.000]  you know, much less at, you know, 5 in the morning or 445 in the morning when
[52:20.000 --> 52:22.000]  there's no other cars on the road.
[52:22.000 --> 52:27.000]  So, I mean, am I imagining things or is there a statute?
[52:27.000 --> 52:31.000]  Well, say that, wait a minute, give me the conditions again that he's talking
[52:31.000 --> 52:33.000]  about relating to the wide turn.
[52:33.000 --> 52:36.000]  Yeah, well, she just turned the corner, you know, cautiously.
[52:36.000 --> 52:39.000]  She's not like aggressive, you know.
[52:39.000 --> 52:42.000]  Well, right, but when you say she turned the corner cautiously, did she
[52:42.000 --> 52:47.000]  straddle the middle line in her lane before she made the turn or did she swing
[52:47.000 --> 52:52.000]  wide enough on the turn to cross the line on where she was turning onto?
[52:52.000 --> 52:56.000]  You know, she was in her lane, and she just turned into the, you know, the
[52:56.000 --> 53:00.000]  lanes that she was going to continue on up to work, and then she got in her
[53:00.000 --> 53:05.000]  lane, you know, just about like I've done a million times, you know, where you
[53:05.000 --> 53:07.000]  just turn and you get in the lane, you're going to go and go.
[53:07.000 --> 53:11.000]  And he said that it was a wide right, you know, wide right turn, and that's
[53:11.000 --> 53:12.000]  why you pulled her over.
[53:12.000 --> 53:14.000]  A wide right turn.
[53:14.000 --> 53:17.000]  Yeah, that's what he said, quote, unquote.
[53:17.000 --> 53:20.000]  Okay, and there wasn't anything?
[53:20.000 --> 53:25.000]  Well, again, without actually seeing the situation of where he's at, they will
[53:25.000 --> 53:27.000]  come up with anything.
[53:27.000 --> 53:28.000]  Oh, yeah.
[53:28.000 --> 53:32.000]  Answer me this, what does your wife look like in the car?
[53:32.000 --> 53:35.000]  She looks like a really sweet person.
[53:35.000 --> 53:42.000]  She's tiny, about 5'2", something like that, and she's really kind of on the
[53:42.000 --> 53:48.000]  shy side, and usually anyone who meets her says she has a nice demeanor.
[53:48.000 --> 53:52.000]  But is she attractive and young enough to get attention?
[53:52.000 --> 53:54.000]  I think so.
[53:54.000 --> 53:57.000]  Okay, well, then that's another possibility.
[53:57.000 --> 54:00.000]  He wanted to pull her over for personal inspection, not for any other reason,
[54:00.000 --> 54:02.000]  so he fabricated one.
[54:02.000 --> 54:06.000]  Yeah, well, he asked for her license, and she thought she didn't have it with
[54:06.000 --> 54:08.000]  him, and I said, you didn't give it to him, did you?
[54:08.000 --> 54:10.000]  And she's like, well, I couldn't find it.
[54:10.000 --> 54:11.000]  It was in my wallet, but I thought I didn't have it.
[54:11.000 --> 54:13.000]  And he said, well, you can go on your way then.
[54:13.000 --> 54:15.000]  Just be careful next time.
[54:15.000 --> 54:18.000]  And I said, well, I said, he shouldn't have stopped you to begin with, and I
[54:18.000 --> 54:19.000]  quoted the Texans.
[54:19.000 --> 54:23.000]  Yeah, and based upon that response from him, I'm willing to bet that's exactly
[54:23.000 --> 54:24.000]  what happened.
[54:24.000 --> 54:27.000]  And since his video would have showed she did nothing wrong, he wouldn't have
[54:27.000 --> 54:30.000]  had any proof if you all were smart enough to get the video.
[54:30.000 --> 54:37.000]  Yeah, well, I think I am, I have, I really am thinking about filing charges on
[54:37.000 --> 54:41.000]  him for, you know, doing that, stopping her without any authority anyway.
[54:41.000 --> 54:43.000]  Well, do yourself a favor.
[54:43.000 --> 54:46.000]  Before you do that, do a PIR and get the video.
[54:46.000 --> 54:48.000]  Mm-hmm, yeah.
[54:48.000 --> 54:52.000]  Well, you know, it's funny because I've actually, you know, been trying to
[54:52.000 --> 54:57.000]  slightly educate people here on that, you know, on the traffic laws because I
[54:57.000 --> 55:01.000]  had your seminar and I've been listening to it and studying it and reading it.
[55:01.000 --> 55:05.000]  And, you know, I've had my own experiences in court as well and, you know,
[55:05.000 --> 55:08.000]  found that most courts are like kangaroo courts.
[55:08.000 --> 55:13.000]  But, you know, that Texas Administrative Code, the Title 37, Part 1, Chapter 4,
[55:13.000 --> 55:19.000]  Subchapter B, Rule 413, I showed it to a fellow I've done some work for in the
[55:19.000 --> 55:22.000]  past, and he said, oh, that doesn't apply, that's commercial.
[55:22.000 --> 55:25.000]  And, you know, I've told him, I said, well, of course it's commercial.
[55:25.000 --> 55:27.000]  The whole law is commercial.
[55:27.000 --> 55:28.000]  That's the whole point.
[55:28.000 --> 55:31.000]  This is the only authority, the only thing that gives them authority to do what
[55:31.000 --> 55:34.000]  they do and there are certain conditions that need to be met.
[55:34.000 --> 55:40.000]  But, you know, you tell people this and, you know, it's like you say how, you
[55:40.000 --> 55:44.000]  know, you ask a lot of people too, well, how did you react when you first hear
[55:44.000 --> 55:45.000]  this information?
[55:45.000 --> 55:47.000]  And it's kind of a disbelief thing, you know.
[55:47.000 --> 55:51.000]  I can't believe they're doing this with no authority and I guess it takes a
[55:51.000 --> 55:53.000]  while to set in, you know.
[55:53.000 --> 55:59.000]  But, you know, if you wouldn't mind, I mean, I know what it means, but if you
[55:59.000 --> 56:02.000]  could just touch on that subject right now and let everybody know about that
[56:02.000 --> 56:06.000]  real quick because, you know, you're more eloquent than I am, you know, about
[56:06.000 --> 56:10.000]  that certain code and why it doesn't just, you know, or it is a commercial
[56:10.000 --> 56:15.000]  code but why it applies to them because, you know, how they're stopping you and
[56:15.000 --> 56:19.000]  how it limits their authority or how they have no authority to do what they
[56:19.000 --> 56:21.000]  do, you know, that would be great.
[56:21.000 --> 56:24.000]  Well, when you say the code, you're referring to the transportation code.
[56:24.000 --> 56:26.000]  Are you wanting me to talk about some specific part of it?
[56:26.000 --> 56:30.000]  Well, I'm talking about the Texas Administrative Code, you know, the Title
[56:30.000 --> 56:34.000]  37, the Rule 413, you know, the authority to enforce.
[56:34.000 --> 56:35.000]  Okay, yeah.
[56:35.000 --> 56:36.000]  Yeah.
[56:36.000 --> 56:39.000]  Well, the thing is, another thing that the state and the courts fail to
[56:39.000 --> 56:44.000]  address is who is actually authorized to stop, which is what the Texas
[56:44.000 --> 56:46.000]  Administrative Code section you're referring to does.
[56:46.000 --> 56:52.000]  It specifies how one becomes authorized to enforce traffic laws.
[56:52.000 --> 56:55.000]  Now, here's the thing.
[56:55.000 --> 57:00.000]  In every single enforcement chapter in the transportation code, there is a
[57:00.000 --> 57:06.000]  definition for the term department and that is always defined as one of two
[57:06.000 --> 57:11.000]  entities, the Department of Transportation for anything that deals with
[57:11.000 --> 57:17.000]  maintenance design, marking, or registration of motor vehicles, and then
[57:17.000 --> 57:22.000]  you have the enforcement provisions dealing with public safety and welfare
[57:22.000 --> 57:26.000]  and the directing of traffic, which is in all the other chapters, and the
[57:26.000 --> 57:29.000]  department there is specifically defined as the Department of Public
[57:29.000 --> 57:32.000]  Safety of the State of Texas.
[57:32.000 --> 57:39.000]  Nowhere does the term department use local law enforcement, nowhere.
[57:39.000 --> 57:44.000]  Doesn't use municipal cops, doesn't use county, doesn't use constable as part
[57:44.000 --> 57:45.000]  of the definition.
[57:45.000 --> 57:50.000]  It's only the Department of Public Safety authorized to act as a member of
[57:50.000 --> 57:54.000]  the department for enforcement of that chapter.
[57:54.000 --> 58:01.000]  So chapter 541 in the definitions defines police officer, where it says
[58:01.000 --> 58:09.000]  543, but a police officer is one that is authorized to arrest and enforce
[58:09.000 --> 58:11.000]  transportation statutes.
[58:11.000 --> 58:17.000]  Well, in this case, since all officers must be members of the department,
[58:17.000 --> 58:24.000]  then police officer in that context and peace officer in the context of 543
[58:24.000 --> 58:28.000]  can only mean Department of Public Safety or one that is specifically
[58:28.000 --> 58:36.000]  authorized by them via Title 37, Chapter 4, Rule 4.13.
[58:36.000 --> 58:37.000]  Okay?
[58:37.000 --> 58:38.000]  Yep.
[58:38.000 --> 58:39.000]  All right.
[58:39.000 --> 58:40.000]  Anything else?
[58:40.000 --> 58:41.000]  Well, I had something on the...
[58:41.000 --> 58:42.000]  All right.
[58:42.000 --> 58:43.000]  Well, hang on then.
[58:43.000 --> 58:44.000]  We'll get you on the other side of the break.
[58:44.000 --> 58:45.000]  All right, folks.
[58:45.000 --> 58:47.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:47.000 --> 58:48.000]  Top of the hour break.
[58:48.000 --> 58:50.000]  We will be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:55.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are
[58:55.000 --> 58:58.000]  frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:03.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process
[59:03.000 --> 59:07.000]  can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:14.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real
[59:14.000 --> 59:18.000]  story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:23.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing
[59:23.000 --> 59:27.000]  an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced
[59:27.000 --> 59:28.000]  before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:32.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for
[59:32.000 --> 59:33.000]  the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:38.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll
[59:38.000 --> 59:48.000]  free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.000 --> 01:00:03.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:03.000 --> 01:00:07.000]  This is the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist
[01:00:07.000 --> 01:00:11.000]  updates, online at thelibertybeat.com.
[01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:16.000]  I'm Brian Hagan with your Liberty Beat for Monday, February 24, 2014.
[01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:23.000]  Gold opened today at $1,331, silver opened at $22.02, while Bitcoin is
[01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:27.000]  trading at $569.90.
[01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:32.000]  Support for the Liberty Beat comes from SovereignBTC, media, marketing, and
[01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:38.000]  consulting for the Bitcoin ecosystem, online at SovereignBTC.com.
[01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:42.000]  Support for the Liberty Beat also comes from Mass Appeal, affordable high
[01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:46.000]  quality printing, now accepting Bitcoin.
[01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Find them online at MassAppealInc.com.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:50.000]  The CEO of Mt.
[01:00:50.000 --> 01:00:53.000]  Gox has resigned from the board of the Bitcoin Foundation.
[01:00:53.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  Reuters reports Mark Karpoly stepped down Sunday with the resignation
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:00:59.000]  effective immediately.
[01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  His decision follows numerous apparent missteps and technical issues incurred
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  by the Tokyo-based Mt.
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:09.000]  Gox Bitcoin exchange, including the decision to halt all withdrawals.
[01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  Mt.
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  Gox was a founding member and one of the three elected industry
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  representatives on the Bitcoin Foundation board.
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:23.000]  Hong Kong's first Bitcoin retail outlet is set to open on Friday.
[01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:27.000]  The South China Morning Post reports the 400-square-foot shop in Sai Ying
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:32.000]  Hun will allow walk-in customers to trade cash for Bitcoin.
[01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:35.000]  An identity card and proof of address will be required of customers in order
[01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:40.000]  to comply with customs and excise rules regarding money laundering.
[01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  As the retail outlet is set to open, several firms are working to install
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:49.000]  Bitcoin ATMs at locations in Hong Kong.
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:53.000]  The United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, commonly
[01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  known as DARPA, has announced they will be working on a smartphone-piloted
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  military drone.
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:03.000]  The drone will be designed to assist troops on the front lines of battle in
[01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  avoiding explosive devices.
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:10.000]  Drone pilots would fly the machines using the aerial reconfigurable embedded
[01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:15.000]  system installed on a smartphone or tablet.
[01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:20.000]  Support for Deliver-TV comes from Dorothy Erminger at Cap Star Lending.
[01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:23.000]  Dorothy can walk you through the ins and outs of buying a home.
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  Give her a call, 512-343-6494, or apply online at calledorothy.com.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:34.000]  And MLS, number 216-624.
[01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  Support also comes from My Magic Mud, available at Brave New Books,
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  or online at mymagicmud.com.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  And from Brave New Books, online at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:51.000]  This is the Liberty Beat for Monday, February 24, 2014.
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  Check out the website at thelibertybeat.com.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:05.000]  Music
[01:03:05.000 --> 01:03:12.000]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty
[01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:19.000]  I read his book, and he says he cares not for the unsightly
[01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:26.000]  These warm hands will come by that term right
[01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:30.000]  I will pray for the one I love
[01:03:30.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:36.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to finish up with Robert, Susan, Rob.
[01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:40.000]  I see y'all there, so y'all hang on just a minute, and I'll get with you.
[01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:44.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:48.000]  We got about an hour left in the show, so I'm still going to need some callers.
[01:03:48.000 --> 01:03:50.000]  All right, Robert, let's finish up.
[01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  Okay.
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  The transportation code, it's section 201.904, the speed signs.
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:03:59.000]  Yeah.
[01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:04.000]  Okay, when I was in court, you know, they gave me the ticket that they gave me,
[01:04:04.000 --> 01:04:07.000]  and I didn't give them my driver's license or nothing like that.
[01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:11.000]  But when I went to court, I challenged the jurisdiction and all that,
[01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  and the judge wouldn't hear anything about it or anything.
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:17.000]  And, you know, I told them, gave them warnings, whatever, and it didn't matter.
[01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:24.000]  But either way, I tried to introduce this, you know, as the facts, you know,
[01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  as part of my evidence, because he said I disobeyed the posted speed limit signs,
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:31.000]  you know, or the posted speed.
[01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  And I said, well, you know, and I quoted the law, you know, 201.904,
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:39.000]  and I said, well, that law only applies to commercial vehicles, you know.
[01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:44.000]  You don't make that assertion.
[01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:46.000]  You never make that assertion.
[01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  The moment you assert, you take on the burden of proof.
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  You get the officer to assert, not you.
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:58.000]  Yeah, well, I'm just, I'm kind of generalizing.
[01:04:58.000 --> 01:04:59.000]  I didn't really do that.
[01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  I'm just saying.
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:01.000]  Okay.
[01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  Yeah, you know, I'm trying to like speak.
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  Yeah, I'm just clarifying for the rest of them out there.
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:05.000]  Don't do that.
[01:05:05.000 --> 01:05:06.000]  Oh, yeah.
[01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  But anyway, this was like after, you know, the jury, they,
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  there was no way they were going to, you know, introduce that.
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  And I told the, you know, the judge that, you know, the attorney for the state,
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:23.000]  the alleged attorney for the state,
[01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  which admitted right there in front of the witnesses I had in court
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  that he did not have an anti-bribery statement or a bond,
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:34.000]  in which I told the judge he's not qualified to represent the state.
[01:05:34.000 --> 01:05:37.000]  And I told, you know, I also told the judge he was in contempt
[01:05:37.000 --> 01:05:40.000]  because he was trying to hide facts and evidence,
[01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:43.000]  you know, because they didn't want to introduce all of the law, you know,
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:45.000]  and all the facts, you know, to the case.
[01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:47.000]  And, you know, I didn't want to go to merits anyway.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:49.000]  But anyway, this was like to the side.
[01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:51.000]  And he had people helping him in the gallery.
[01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  There was just a bunch of crap that they do, you know, like you say.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  It's just, you know, they do crap they're not supposed to do.
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  But anyway, the, what is that, the commandant,
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  the guy with the masters, Sergeant Stripes?
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  Is that the commandant to the DPS or?
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  I don't know which guy with Sergeant Stripes you're referring to.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  Well, the DPS guy.
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:15.000]  And the commandant is not a sergeant, I can tell you that.
[01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  Okay.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:19.000]  So if he's wearing Sergeant Stripes, it ain't the commandant.
[01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:24.000]  Well, it seemed like it was the trooper who issued me the ticket, the citation.
[01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:26.000]  You know, state trooper, it's the boss.
[01:06:26.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  And he, you know, he said, what speed limit sign law are you talking about?
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  And I pulled it out.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:35.000]  And, you know, because I was talking to my sons about it.
[01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:36.000]  I said, this is crazy.
[01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  And he overheard me.
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:39.000]  He says, what speed limit sign are you talking about?
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:41.000]  And I thought he was in earnest trying to find out.
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  And I gave him a copy of the law.
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:44.000]  And I said, well, read it.
[01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  And he was reading it.
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:46.000]  And he stopped halfway.
[01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:49.000]  And he goes, well, I said, why don't you, you know, I told him, I said,
[01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  why don't you finish reading it out loud so, you know, everyone can hear?
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  He says, well, this doesn't apply to you anyway.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:06:55.000]  You can't nitpick laws.
[01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  And I said, no.
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:06:59.000]  I said, you guys are the one that's nitpicking the laws
[01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  because you're supposed to use the whole law, not just the piece of it that suits you.
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:07.000]  And he turns around and he tells me, well, you better follow the law the way I see fit.
[01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  You know, basically threaten me right there in the court, you know.
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  But, you know, it's, you know, it's like you say, these guys, you know, they,
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  I really doubt even these troopers that they even actually go in
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:26.000]  and actually read, you know, the laws that they're supposedly enforcing, honestly.
[01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:28.000]  Because, you know, when you hand them a copy of it,
[01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:34.000]  it's like you're handing them a piece of asteroid from a different universe or something.
[01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:37.000]  They just act like they've never seen it before, you know.
[01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:38.000]  Well, that would be true.
[01:07:38.000 --> 01:07:39.000]  They haven't.
[01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  Yeah.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  So it's just crazy.
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:47.000]  But, you know, that particular, you know, the speed sign statute, it's very clear.
[01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  It says, you know, compensation or hire.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  It describes all the commercial vehicles.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:55.000]  I mean, there's no way around that, you know.
[01:07:55.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  And they actually, you know, that guy actually told me, well, this law don't apply to you.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:00.000]  And I said, that's right.
[01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  It doesn't.
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  Neither does any of these laws apply to me.
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:09.000]  And, you know, I had, you know, I asked the script questions of the trooper on the stand,
[01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:12.000]  and he committed perjury like three times.
[01:08:12.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  And, you know, the attorney for the state, you know, calls the, he said,
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:18.000]  Your Honor, can we approach the bench?
[01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:19.000]  And he gets me up there.
[01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  And that judge goes, well, if what you're saying is true, you know,
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:27.000]  then, you know, we shouldn't try anyone for these laws.
[01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:30.000]  And I said, well, I said, I'm not here to argue any of that stuff.
[01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:34.000]  What I am telling you is that, you know, there are certain things that, you know,
[01:08:34.000 --> 01:08:35.000]  he's got to prove here in court.
[01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:38.000]  And so far, you all haven't proved anything.
[01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:42.000]  And, you know, I said, and besides, Your Honor, I said, that, I didn't call him Your Honor,
[01:08:42.000 --> 01:08:44.000]  I called him Judge.
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:47.000]  I said, besides Judge, I said, your trooper there committed perjury three times,
[01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:51.000]  and I'm still waiting for you to, you know, hold him for perjury here.
[01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  And he says, well, you let him worry about that.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:58.000]  And I'm like, well, you're the one that's supposed to be worrying about that, not me.
[01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:00.000]  I mean, not him, you know.
[01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  And then I said, well, this attorney here is guilty of contempt as well for, you know,
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  trying to hold, you know, hide evidence from this clerk.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:10.000]  He goes, well, no, he's a friendly guy.
[01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:11.000]  He doesn't mean anything.
[01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:14.000]  You just need to get back over there, and you need to settle down.
[01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:17.000]  You know, it was just a big kangaroo court kind of thing.
[01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  And, you know, it was my first case.
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  But I did learn a lot from it.
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  Yeah.
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:25.000]  Well, you need to learn every time you go in there.
[01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:27.000]  Whenever you're dealing with these people, if you're not learning something,
[01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:29.000]  you're not paying attention.
[01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:33.000]  It was just, and they were, I mean, they're slick.
[01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:34.000]  They've got a lot of practice.
[01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:38.000]  And it's like you say, you know, you got to be prepared.
[01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:40.000]  You know, it's a fight.
[01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:41.000]  And, you know, it's a bar fight.
[01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  And you just got to be ready.
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:47.000]  And, you know, after the mistake, I guess you learn from your mistakes is what I'm trying to say.
[01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:49.000]  And I wish I wouldn't have made those mistakes.
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  And, you know, it's easier to say, well, I should have done this, should have done that.
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:58.000]  But that's why, you know, I don't live in Austin, but geez, as God is my friend.
[01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  Boy, if I did, I'd be in your class every Sunday bugging you.
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:06.000]  Because, you know, I mean, I don't know why people don't go to your class.
[01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:07.000]  Honestly, I don't.
[01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:10.000]  And I wish you'd come up here to the Panhandle area.
[01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:13.000]  And I wish I could get you up here somehow to give a seminar or something.
[01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  Well, I would love to be able to go places like that and do that.
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  Unfortunately, it requires a minimum number of people with a minimal amount of money
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:22.000]  to make it cost effective to do so.
[01:10:22.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  Yeah.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:24.000]  That's the only problem.
[01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:28.000]  I'm going to work on it because I think it's important to get you up here.
[01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  And I'll keep in touch with you.
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:32.000]  I've already written you about it.
[01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:38.000]  But, you know, I'm going to try my darnedest to get people, you know, to do that.
[01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:41.000]  Yeah, I've got somebody asking me to come to Houston and do the same thing.
[01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:43.000]  But I kind of have to give them the same answer.
[01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:45.000]  Distance alone is not really the issue.
[01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:51.000]  It's whether or not we've got enough people and the expenses are going to be offset by at least what we make on the trip.
[01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  Mm-hmm.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:53.000]  Yeah.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:54.000]  Yeah.
[01:10:54.000 --> 01:10:57.000]  Well, you know, I'm going to keep trying, though, to get you up here.
[01:10:57.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  All right.
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  All right.
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:00.000]  Well, God bless you, Eddie.
[01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:01.000]  And thank you for everything.
[01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:02.000]  All right, Robert.
[01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:04.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:11:04.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  All right.
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:06.000]  Now, we're going to take Susan in Florida.
[01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:07.000]  But, Susan, hang on just one second.
[01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:13.000]  Talking to Robert reminded me of something about Judge Phillips' opinion in this case that I was talking about at the beginning of the show.
[01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:26.000]  Judge Phillips, in his opinion, went on to make this statement because one of the things the guy filed in their paperwork was a challenge to the fact that the prosecuting attorney did not have an oath of office in an anti-bribery statement.
[01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  Well, Judge Phillips quoted an attorney general's opinion that specifically says that because a city attorney, or at least the assistant city attorneys, are neither elected nor appointed, they are not required to have any oath of office or anti-bribery statement on file.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:12:16.000]  Now, that would also mean that neither would any municipal judge, with the exception of the head administrative judge, because allegedly, by the definition he used, saying that the assistant city attorneys all work as employees of the city attorney, that the associate judges would all have to work as employees of the actual presiding judge.
[01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  Now, that's the logic you would have to come up with based upon what he said.
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:47.000]  But he said that none of these people have to have oaths of office and anti-bribery statements, yet in the same breath asserted that these same people that are not officers of the state or an employee of the state somehow has the authority to act as representatives for said state in their capacity in these courts.
[01:12:47.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  Now, you want to talk about stupidity walking upright, that's a judicial opinion that should get him disbarred and committed, because it was plain insanity to make that same statement in the same document.
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:05.000]  Yet he did it.
[01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  And this is a county court-at-law judge, and you think he's any smarter than a municipal or a JP? Not a chance in hell.
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:17.000]  Okay?
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  Folks, before these people give you justice, hell will host the Winter Olympics.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  You got it?
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  You better understand that and be prepared to fight and make the record the proper way so that you can get the appeals court to smack them between the eyes, preferably with a meat cleaver.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:38.000]  So be on your toes.
[01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:40.000]  It has to be done.
[01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:45.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Susan in Florida. Susan, what can we do for you?
[01:13:45.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  Hi. My issue may sound a little unusual, but I'm being accused of civil domestic violence by a person that I have been trying to get out of my property that I believe is trespassing on my property.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  I sent him and the bank a letter stating that the foreclosure that I went through was a fraudulent foreclosure, and six weeks later he goes to the courthouse and he gets a domestic violence restraining order.
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  Now the banks had already defaulted to the fact that they had committed this fraudulent foreclosure, and this person never sent me any notice saying that he was threatened, felt threatened in any kind of way,
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:15:03.000]  but for some reason he was able to get a domestic violence restraining order against me, and the notice that the service that they were attempting to serve, first of all, he had a post office box for an address that he could send me correspondence to me.
[01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  They can't give you service by mail in certain cases. They have to do it in person.
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  I understand that, but he could have given me the notice first before the restraining order.
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  Well, the thing is what you need to do is see what affidavit was filed with the court to get the restraining order and then file a counterclaim that the affidavit is falsified.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  Okay. Well, I filed a counterclaim and also a motion to vacate with, but I never received service because the service they were, it was a big issue.
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  Wait a minute. You never received service of what?
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  Of his complaint. I just actually happened to see in the court record that he was filing the complaint.
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  Does Florida law require that he give you service of the complaint for the purpose of getting a restraining order?
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:04.000]  Well, they're supposed to provide notice.
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:10.000]  Well, now wait, wait, wait. Is this a presumption or is it written into the statute that way?
[01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  It's written into the statute that way.
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:14.000]  Okay.
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  That they're supposed to at least attempt to try to get.
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  All right, which is why you need the affidavit because the affidavit that they used to get it would have to state that that's what they did.
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:33.000]  And then you have to be able to show that that's a lie or at least challenge it as a lie.
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:38.000]  But that would mean having to take him to court.
[01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:40.000]  So are you prepared to do that?
[01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  Yeah.
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  Okay. Well, then that's the procedure you need to be worried about.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:49.000]  Hang on just a second. We're going to take a break and then we'll get back to this. Okay?
[01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  Okay.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  All right, folks, rule of law radio. Call in number 512-646-1984. I need a couple more callers at least. We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:15.000]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:19.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Polynbursts.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale and more.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440. We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  My name is Jessica Arman. I'm an activist, a GCN listener and mother of three.
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:10.000]  Our drinking water and food are filled with fluoride and other contaminants that harm our teeth and gums.
[01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:16.000]  To protect my family, I created My Magic Mud, an all-natural teeth whitening and strengthening remedy.
[01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  My Magic Mud is a soft powder that polishes your teeth, reduces sensitivity, and removes harmful toxins from deep inside your mouth.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:29.000]  You deserve a bright, healthy smile. Visit mymagicmud.com and get yours today. That's mymagicmud.com.
[01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:35.000]  Hi, this is Kurt Hildebrand. I've been using Magic Mud for a while now and I just can't believe how much healthier my teeth and gums feel.
[01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:37.000]  I love the product.
[01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:41.000]  This is Anna Martin, the libertarian homeschooler. I homeschool, so I drink coffee.
[01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  And I drink coffee, so I use Magic Mud. It gets my teeth really clean. Give it a try.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  This is John Bush of the Liberty Beat. My wife and I use My Magic Mud because it brightens our smile and our daughter uses it because it makes brushing fun.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  To get your can of My Magic Mud, go to Brave New Books or order it online at mymagicmud.com.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:33.000]  This is my magic mud.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  You put the fear in my pocket, took the money from my hands, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:20:07.000]  Hang on a minute.
[01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:13.000]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio and we are talking to Susan in Florida.
[01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:17.000]  All right, Susan, go ahead.
[01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:32.000]  Okay. Yeah, so the issue is that they were attempting to mail it at an address that I was definitely not at anymore and should have been obvious through the public record that I wasn't at anymore.
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  I actually don't understand where he even received this information, but so they're attempting to get it served at that address.
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  I'm attempting to contact the process server and say, no, that's the wrong address.
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:56.000]  I can meet you in a public place to pick up the service and they avoid providing me with service.
[01:20:56.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  I sent a letter to the judge saying I hadn't been served, but I needed to be provided proof of claim of what he's attesting to, what he's trying to accuse me of,
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:13.000]  and how he thinks he can be in my home seeing that I'm the lawful owner of the property still.
[01:21:13.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  And they didn't send me any documentation at the post office box that I provided them with.
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  And it looks like either the judge or the petitioner tried to send another FedEx on February 14th, and I still haven't received any FedEx or anything.
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:46.000]  Okay. Well, I've got some contact information for you for a gentleman that's in Florida that appears to have gone through the same stuff that you're talking about right now,
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:52.000]  and he might be able to give you some assistance with this. So if you will send me a private email,
[01:21:52.000 --> 01:22:01.000]  Eddie at Rule of Law Radio, that's E-D-D-I-E, at ruleoflawradio.com, I will send you his information and you can get in touch with him.
[01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:12.000]  Okay. Okay. Thank you. Yeah. I think it's an interesting issue because it looks like all across the country they have this thing now where,
[01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:17.000]  I mean, people could just make these accusations and...
[01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:23.000]  Well, as long as that somebody is a bank that the judge is invested with, absolutely.
[01:22:23.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  Okay. So yeah, but I mean, it's just, and to call it a civil domestic violence, then you don't get, you know, you don't have a trial by jury.
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  Yeah. Well, that's the difference between getting the restraining order versus getting a charge and a trial.
[01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:54.000]  They're completely different processes. A restraining order is more or less administrative.
[01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:58.000]  So it's not an actual trial for which you would get to go in front of a jury.
[01:22:58.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  Now, if you claim that it's invalid, well, actually, I tell you what, I don't know Florida law well enough to dictate as to what would be good procedure or not.
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  But apparently this gentleman that I'm going to send you the information on has done exactly this.
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  So he can tell you for sure, possibly one way or the other.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  Okay.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:20.000]  Okay.
[01:23:20.000 --> 01:23:21.000]  Thank you, sir.
[01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:22.000]  You're very welcome.
[01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:23.000]  And thanks for the show.
[01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  Yes, ma'am. Thanks for calling in.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:28.000]  All right. Now we're going to go to Gary in Texas.
[01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:30.000]  Gary, what can we do for you?
[01:23:30.000 --> 01:23:40.000]  Hi. Good evening, Eddie. A quick question. I am trying to learn about the term outlawry as used in Texas statutes.
[01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:42.000]  If you could just talk about it for a minute.
[01:23:42.000 --> 01:23:50.000]  And under what conditions could a public official be charged with the offense of outlawry?
[01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  Well, they wouldn't. They would be charged with the offense of official oppression and abuse of official capacity.
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  Outlawry would just be a method by which that charge could be made.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:12.000]  I'm not sure that outlawry in and of itself is an actual offense.
[01:24:12.000 --> 01:24:16.000]  Okay.
[01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:23.000]  Outlawry, the way that I understand it, and again, I'm just learning about this, so I hope you'll correct me.
[01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  But is outlawry appears to be when a public official through denial of due process essentially declares someone as an outlaw?
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:47.000]  Well, when they deprive you of your rights, that's declaring you an outlaw.
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:53.000]  In essence, that's exactly what they're doing when they deprive you of fundamentally protected rights.
[01:24:53.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  They're declaring you outside the law. Therefore, the law and the rights protected by it don't apply.
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  That's what outlawry is, that you're outside the law.
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  And so the thing is, is there is not a Texas code that has anything to do with outlaw or outlawry or outlawed in it.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  Yeah, I don't see one.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:24.000]  Yeah, there isn't. The Texas Constitution is the only place where the term is used.
[01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  Right. And it has something to do, it's used in conjunction with transportation, is it not, in the Constitution?
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:39.000]  Well, I don't know about that, but hang on just a second and we can find out real quick.
[01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:51.000]  Yeah, I'm a little confused about it.
[01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  Okay.
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:25:59.000]  Trying to find it as well.
[01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  Yeah, I don't find any of those specific terms. I know the term is in there to a degree, but still.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:21.000]  Okay. So outlawry is more a result and not an act.
[01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  Outlawry or transportation for offense, Section 20 of the Bill of Rights. No citizen shall be outlawed.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  No person shall be transported out of the state for any offense committed within the same.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  This section does not prohibit an agreement with another state providing for the confinement of inmates in this state in the penal or correctional facilities of that state.
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  Okay. That's the only type of transportation it deals with is if they commit the crime in Texas, you can't transport them somewhere out of state to try them.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  Gotcha. Okay. All right. So then in essence, it goes back to the offense of official oppression.
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  And abuse of official capacity, yes.
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:13.000]  And abuse of official capacity. Okay, cool. All right. Thank you, sir. I appreciate you.
[01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:15.000]  Yes, sir. You're very welcome.
[01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  Okay. Have a good night.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:18.000]  All right. You too.
[01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:23.000]  All right. Now we're going to go. Let's see who we got up next here.
[01:27:23.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  Norman in California. Norman, what can we do for you?
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  Hi, Eddie. I have a problem with a certain court clerk, actually a deputy court clerk who is playing gatekeeper.
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:39.000]  I've been trying to get my...
[01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:42.000]  Explain what you mean by gatekeeper.
[01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:49.000]  He's not filing, as the court rules say he should, docketing my case into the court records.
[01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:56.000]  Then when was the last time that you called an officer over there and said, please watch this clerk refuse to file my pleadings in my case?
[01:27:56.000 --> 01:27:58.000]  I haven't done that yet.
[01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:04.000]  Can I ask you why?
[01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  I don't know. I've been trying to deal with them in writing.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:12.000]  Okay. But that doesn't answer my question. Why haven't you done that?
[01:28:12.000 --> 01:28:15.000]  Because what this clerk is doing is deprivation of a right.
[01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  He's denying you access to the courts to seek remedy for a grievance, correct?
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:22.000]  Correct.
[01:28:22.000 --> 01:28:24.000]  Okay. That's a crime.
[01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  So get an officer to accompany you there and tell the officer ahead of time, look, I have pleadings to file in a court relating to a case or what I'm trying to start.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  The clerk is denying me access to the courts in denial of my rights, and if they refuse to take these pleadings and file in this case, I want you to arrest them for doing so.
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  Well, this court happens to be on the other side of the country, so showing up in person would be a little bit difficult.
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:00.000]  Okay.
[01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  So how do you have authority to file in a court on the other side of the country?
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:19.000]  This is a case three years old now. Originally I filed in California Superior Court, fraudulent removed in the federal district court.
[01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:23.000]  They're a bit as corrupt as you might imagine.
[01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  I appealed to the Ninth Circuit. They issued a one and a half page memorandum, as they call it, rubber stamping the district court.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  Okay. Hang on just a second, Norman, and we'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. We've got about a half an hour left in the show.
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  A couple of people still up on the board here, three or four, actually.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  So y'all hang in there, folks, and I'll get to y'all on the other side as quick as I can, and when we get back we will finish up with Norman.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:30:02.000]  Y'all hold on. We'll be right back.
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:09.000]  Please scan your next item. That annoying mechanical voice from the self-checkout lane may soon be silenced for good.
[01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll have great news on the death of computerized cashiers next.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:21.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:44.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:49.000]  Apparently, I'm not the only one who hates the self-serve check stands at stores.
[01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:53.000]  After a decade of trying them, retailers are finally acknowledging studies that say
[01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:58.000]  shoppers would rather dodge the self-serve lane and head for a human cashier.
[01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:03.000]  Today, just 16 percent of grocery store transactions go through self-checkout lanes.
[01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:06.000]  That's down from a high of 22 percent three years ago.
[01:31:06.000 --> 01:31:10.000]  Shoppers say they're more satisfied when they pay people, not cold computers.
[01:31:10.000 --> 01:31:16.000]  In response, grocery chains like Big Y and Albertsons plan to bag the do-it-yourself option
[01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  and bring back customer service. Hooray.
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  Now, if only they dump the purchase tracking cards, I mean, membership cards.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:28.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:40.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:40.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  and believe there is more to the story.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:02.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:02.000 --> 01:32:06.000]  Nutritious food is real body armor. It builds muscle, burns fat,
[01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:15.000]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:19.000]  and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:22.000]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years,
[01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:25.000]  and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:32:25.000 --> 01:32:29.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:35.000]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts
[01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:41.000]  is the best-kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:45.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein,
[01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367,
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at HempUSA.org.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:14.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:14.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  His rule of law radio,
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:46.000]  and we are still talking to Norman in California.
[01:33:46.000 --> 01:33:49.000]  All right, Norman, let's see if we can wrap this up for you here.
[01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  Okay.
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  So I was talking about progressing through the court system.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  You said that they rubber-stamped the ruling by which court?
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:06.000]  The district court.
[01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:14.000]  So I appealed to the Supreme Court, and it's been locked up by this one guy.
[01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:22.000]  He claims, I've been, per se, informal paupress throughout this entire case.
[01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  He claims I was noncompliant with the Supreme Court rule dealing with informal paupress.
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  That was bold.
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  I said, well, I'll need specifics, quote the sentence.
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:41.000]  In the meantime, he just sends back my entire 1,000-page filing
[01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:44.000]  and reissues the same form letter.
[01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:48.000]  So the third time, I said, okay, I'm done with this.
[01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:55.000]  I'll pay the $300 filing fee that nonindigent litigants pay.
[01:34:55.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  Here it is.
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:02.000]  He writes back, sends back the whole package, and says, no, it wasn't in there.
[01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  I cut the package open.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  There it is, right where I left it.
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:14.000]  So I've come not to trust this guy, and my question is, basically,
[01:35:14.000 --> 01:35:18.000]  I need remedy or politics or whatever you want to call it,
[01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:28.000]  but I need a way to verify that, yeah, the money order is in there,
[01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  and I don't know how to do that.
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  He could just easily tear it up.
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:36.000]  It's like he has a vendetta against me or something.
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:39.000]  So I was wondering if you had any ideas.
[01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  If it's not hand-delivered, but somebody gets him to sign off
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:47.000]  for everything that's in it, I mean, when you send out a certified packet
[01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:53.000]  in the case of a lawsuit, you're normally required to list what's in it.
[01:35:53.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  And once it's signed for, the person has to accept whatever's on that list.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:02.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  So I just include a list of everything.
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:10.000]  It's funny, the green card that comes back, it's never signed.
[01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  They just...
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  Yeah, if he's rejecting it as if they're just refusing service,
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:20.000]  then that's proof they never opened it, and that's proof he's intentionally
[01:36:20.000 --> 01:36:25.000]  blocking your access to the court in order to delay whatever it is you're doing.
[01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:27.000]  Okay.
[01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:31.000]  As long as you've got all the proper postmarks to show it went out the door
[01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:33.000]  and it's being refused on the other end,
[01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:37.000]  because the post office is supposed to mark it if it was refused.
[01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:42.000]  Yeah, it always comes back, so no problem there.
[01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  Nobody signs for it, of course.
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  But is the post office marking that it was refused?
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  No, no, it comes back as received or whatever they...
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:58.000]  It can't be received if there wasn't a signature.
[01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:03.000]  Well, I mean, not technically to service to an individual or a particular person,
[01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  but it would have been received within the mail system of the Supreme Court.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:09.000]  Who says they received it?
[01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  Nobody.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  It's just got a date stamp on it, and it comes back to me.
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  No name, no nothing.
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:18.000]  I think the post...
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  Then you need to get the post office to trace everywhere it's been
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  and get that as an actual report back from the post office.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  Get a certified report from the post office showing that it was delivered
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  and it was refused, and then petition to have charges filed against this clerk.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:41.000]  Yeah, they're not refusing it.
[01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  In fact, they take it out of the box.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:47.000]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  They can't open it if they didn't sign for it.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:55.000]  On the green card you're talking about?
[01:37:55.000 --> 01:37:56.000]  Correct.
[01:37:56.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  They're not signing for it.
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  There's no name.
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:01.000]  It's just date stamped, the green card.
[01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  Sometimes comes back within a week, in one case two months.
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:09.000]  But no, there's never a name on it.
[01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:15.000]  The post office is falling down on the job, I believe.
[01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  Then do directed service.
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:22.000]  Direct it to a specific named individual if you know one.
[01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  Okay, directed service.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  That's what registered mail is.
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  Registered mail requires that you send it to a specific person.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  Okay.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:36.000]  And that person would have to sign for it?
[01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:38.000]  Correct.
[01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  Okay.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:43.000]  I'll do that then.
[01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:44.000]  Okay, you're welcome.
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:45.000]  Okay, you have a goodness.
[01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:46.000]  You too.
[01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:47.000]  Okay.
[01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  All right, now we're going to go to Don in Indiana.
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:52.000]  Don, what can we do for you?
[01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:54.000]  Well, Eddie, can you hear me okay?
[01:38:54.000 --> 01:38:56.000]  I've got a hearing aid on.
[01:38:56.000 --> 01:38:59.000]  I thought maybe it's feeding back through the phone or something.
[01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:01.000]  No, sir, I can hear you just fine.
[01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:10.000]  Okay, I've got a little story here to tell you about kind of pertains to your first question to beginning of the program.
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:12.000]  All right.
[01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  This happened quite a few years ago.
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:21.000]  I lived in a little town called Butler, Indiana, and I had a friend that lived in town there.
[01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  And they had a reserve cop.
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:28.000]  It's kind of a smart aleck anyhow.
[01:39:28.000 --> 01:39:31.000]  He'd stop people late at night and stuff, you know, and harass them.
[01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:33.000]  Yeah.
[01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:37.000]  And I imagine it probably happened when the bars closed.
[01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  I don't know for sure.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  But anyhow, this friend of mine called and asked me if I'd been in town the night before.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:46.000]  I told him, no, I hadn't been.
[01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:48.000]  And I've got a black girlfriend.
[01:39:48.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  I'm about the only guy around town that had a black girlfriend that I know of.
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:40:02.000]  And this cop called, pulled his car or truck, I don't know which it was, over late at night or early in the morning,
[01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:10.000]  and walked up to his window and the guy rolled his window down and stuck a pistol out at the cop
[01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  and told him, he got a new sheriff in town tonight.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:18.000]  And I think I understand the cop getting scared at him.
[01:40:18.000 --> 01:40:22.000]  He turned around and went back to his police car and left.
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:29.000]  And he went down to my buddy's house and cleaned up and changed his clothes and stuff.
[01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:32.000]  He messed his pants.
[01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:33.000]  What happened?
[01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:38.000]  I had to laugh about it when I heard it, but it could have been a serious situation and the right cop.
[01:40:38.000 --> 01:40:40.000]  That's true.
[01:40:40.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  Yeah.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:44.000]  I just, I've been listening to everybody in the program.
[01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  I noticed you didn't have too many people calling in about your question.
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:50.000]  No, not too many has commented on it so far.
[01:40:50.000 --> 01:40:53.000]  But that's the way it works sometimes.
[01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  Yeah. Okay.
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  That's why I called in.
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:40:56.000]  All right, Don.
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:40:57.000]  Well, thank you.
[01:40:57.000 --> 01:40:58.000]  Yeah. Have a good night.
[01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  Sure. Bye-bye.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:01.000]  All right.
[01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  Now we've got Jonathan in California.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:06.000]  Jonathan, what can we do for you?
[01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  Well, I was parked in a parking lot and I was ready to clean out my car.
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  And then a myriad of PD pulled up onto me.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  And I'm assuming ran my plate and found out that I apparently was driving while suspended.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  So I'm assuming that that's legit.
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  But he had no real reason to even run my plate.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:34.000]  So I don't understand.
[01:41:34.000 --> 01:41:37.000]  I mean, it wasn't like I was breaking the peace or.
[01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  Well, unfortunately, the courts have already ruled that your license plate has no expectation of privacy
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:48.000]  because you are compelled to display it in a public place where they can run it when they want to.
[01:41:48.000 --> 01:41:52.000]  See, that's kind of the oxymoron way of them looking at these things.
[01:41:52.000 --> 01:41:57.000]  But here is an argument that you could make.
[01:41:57.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  Unless the officer can show probable cause.
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:16.000]  It is actually a felony in most states for them to access drivers license and registration information records without it.
[01:42:16.000 --> 01:42:28.000]  If they cannot establish proper probable cause, simply typing in a plate and accessing that private information is a felony.
[01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  Yeah, well, I was going through your script and it said it set him off and set him back to the point where he said he made the statement.
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:57.000]  He started making statements like, well, this area is known for drug activity and eluding to illicit crime and basically inferring that I was engaged in those crimes.
[01:42:57.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  You know, talking to somebody who doesn't drink, doesn't smoke, don't do drugs.
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:06.000]  And here I am being accused.
[01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:19.000]  You know, I told him I wasn't going to talk to him no more and I gave him a current identification card.
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  I told him that I was not engaged in transportation at any time and I was not engaged in irregular activity and that I was not engaged in commerce.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  And at that point he goes, well, you have to have a driver's license.
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  And I go, I disagree.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  Yeah.
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:40.000]  All right.
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  Well, hang on just a second, Jonathan.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:44.000]  We'll pick this up on the other side.
[01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  All right, folks.
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:47.000]  I'm your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:43:47.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We've got one more segment here, so y'all hold on and we will be right back.
[01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:42.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:42.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:45:12.000 --> 01:45:32.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:45:32.000 --> 01:45:57.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:45:57.000 --> 01:46:16.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:46:16.000 --> 01:46:28.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:46:28.000 --> 01:46:29.000]  All right, folks.
[01:46:29.000 --> 01:46:30.000]  We are back.
[01:46:30.000 --> 01:46:35.000]  This is Rule of Law Radio and we are currently talking to Jonathan in California.
[01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  All right, Jonathan.
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:39.000]  You were saying that you respectfully told the cop that you disagree.
[01:46:39.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  Now, his question, is the offense alleged by the officer considered an offense or an infraction in California?
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:53.000]  You know, I'm there again.
[01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:54.000]  I'm not sure.
[01:46:54.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  I didn't look at it.
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:46:57.000]  I'm assuming it's an infraction.
[01:46:57.000 --> 01:46:58.000]  Don't assume.
[01:46:58.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  Go read it.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:00.000]  Yeah.
[01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  If it's an infraction and he rolled up on you with nothing, then that's an illegal search and seizure according to the way the courts are ruling on that in California.
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:15.000]  They can't arrest you or take your property for an infraction.
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:16.000]  Yeah.
[01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  Well, I'm supposed to appear and then apparently if I, once I have my license current, then the individual will be dismissed.
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:26.000]  That's according to him.
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:28.000]  You're kind of missing the point.
[01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:33.000]  You can sue the cop because his arrest and seizure was illegal.
[01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:38.000]  You can get the case dismissed because the arrest and seizure was illegal.
[01:47:38.000 --> 01:47:39.000]  Yeah.
[01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:50.000]  So basically I'm going to have to file a complaint and a certified criminal complaint with the department then and then there file.
[01:47:50.000 --> 01:47:51.000]  Absolutely.
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:57.000]  You're going to go in and demand a dismissal because you were arrested for an infraction, which is a violation of your rights.
[01:47:57.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  The officer had no warrant.
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:03.000]  He had no lawful authority to arrest, which is what he did.
[01:48:03.000 --> 01:48:08.000]  Without a warrant, he had no lawful authority to seize.
[01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:12.000]  And he asked me several times, can I have your consent to search your vehicle?
[01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:14.000]  I said absolutely not because I don't know.
[01:48:14.000 --> 01:48:17.000]  There might be a dead body or drugs or something like that.
[01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  I go, no, you're not going to search my vehicle.
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:22.000]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:25.000]  You actually responded that way?
[01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  Yeah.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:29.000]  Why did you say vehicle?
[01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:30.000]  Excuse me.
[01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:31.000]  No, no, no.
[01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:32.000]  Private auto.
[01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:33.000]  No.
[01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:34.000]  Private auto.
[01:48:34.000 --> 01:48:36.000]  At no time did I say vehicle.
[01:48:36.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  Okay.
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:39.000]  But he did.
[01:48:39.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  And you argued with him.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:44.000]  But I, no, I bet I said private auto.
[01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  Okay.
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:46.000]  Yeah.
[01:48:46.000 --> 01:48:47.000]  All right.
[01:48:47.000 --> 01:48:48.000]  That's just the point I'm trying to make.
[01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:50.000]  Be very choice with your words.
[01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:56.000]  I know in this whole scheme I'm finding that words matter, you know, and their meaning.
[01:48:56.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  So, and then whenever he was done searching.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:01.000]  Jonathan, by the way, are you on a speakerphone?
[01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:03.000]  No, I'm on a cell phone, unfortunately.
[01:49:03.000 --> 01:49:04.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:05.000]  All right.
[01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:06.000]  Go ahead, Dan.
[01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  I apologize.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:08.000]  I apologize.
[01:49:08.000 --> 01:49:09.000]  Is that better?
[01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:10.000]  Look, hard to tell.
[01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  Talk a little more and we'll see.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:13.000]  Yeah, okay.
[01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:18.000]  Well, when he was done searching through all my personal facts, then he comes back to the
[01:49:18.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  car and because he detained me in the back of his...
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:25.000]  He searched your car without your consent?
[01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:26.000]  That is correct.
[01:49:26.000 --> 01:49:28.000]  And he detained me in the back of another officer's bitch.
[01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:30.000]  He put you in handcuffs.
[01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:33.000]  No, he did not put me in handcuffs, but he did put me...
[01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:35.000]  He locked you in a car.
[01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:36.000]  That is correct.
[01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:37.000]  Okay.
[01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:38.000]  Same difference.
[01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  False imprisonment.
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:40.000]  False imprisonment.
[01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:41.000]  Got it.
[01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:45.000]  Now, if he detained you in that manner, that's also a false arrest most likely.
[01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  You can make that argument.
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:51.000]  I don't know how California would put it for a cause of action, but at federal, that's
[01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:52.000]  false arrest.
[01:49:52.000 --> 01:49:55.000]  Here in Texas, if you sued in the state, it would be false imprisonment.
[01:49:55.000 --> 01:49:56.000]  Oh, got it.
[01:49:56.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  Yeah.
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:02.000]  Dan, whenever he came back to the car, opened the door and I go, no dead body?
[01:50:02.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  He goes, no, but all I know is there's something really fishy going on here and I don't like
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:10.000]  it.
[01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:11.000]  And I said, okay.
[01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  Well, it's a good thing I wasn't the one in the car.
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:16.000]  I said, you're right.
[01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  The fishy thing is, is you're a complete idiot.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:19.000]  Yeah.
[01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:24.000]  I didn't want to go there because I didn't want to get, as you would say, tased, pummeled
[01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:25.000]  or shot.
[01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:26.000]  So under threat...
[01:50:26.000 --> 01:50:28.000]  Well, the tased part I can deal with.
[01:50:28.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  That just makes my lawsuit better.
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:31.000]  Yeah.
[01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:35.000]  Well, but anyway, so that's my story.
[01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:38.000]  So you're saying that I should go ahead and file a criminal complaint with the...
[01:50:38.000 --> 01:50:39.000]  No.
[01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:44.000]  I'm saying the first thing you do is find out what he attempted to charge you with.
[01:50:44.000 --> 01:50:46.000]  Was it an infraction?
[01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:50.000]  If it was, he has stepped in it up to his hairline.
[01:50:50.000 --> 01:50:51.000]  Yeah.
[01:50:51.000 --> 01:50:52.000]  Interesting.
[01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:59.000]  So hey, yeah, because I was just sitting there and I rolled away because I was gone.
[01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  So...
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  Well, again, we've got two possibilities here.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:09.000]  One, he accessed a database that by their own rules, consider it to be a felony if the
[01:51:09.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  officer did not have probable cause relating to his duties to run the plate.
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:17.000]  Now see, here's the thing.
[01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:23.000]  Right now, there's a female cop that is getting into a lot of trouble because she literally
[01:51:23.000 --> 01:51:28.000]  did the right thing in pulling two other cops off of a guy they were beating up when it
[01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:30.000]  was her call.
[01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:35.000]  Two other city cops from a different city showed up to assist her and tackled a mentally
[01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  unstable individual but who wasn't doing anything wrong and started beating on him.
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:45.000]  And she got the cops off of him by force.
[01:51:45.000 --> 01:51:50.000]  Then they turned around and went after her for allegedly crossing that thin blue line.
[01:51:50.000 --> 01:51:58.000]  Well, since that event, there have been more than 200 accesses via that computer system
[01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:04.000]  from officers all over the state that she's in.
[01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  All of them are being sued for illegally accessing that information because they had no
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:14.000]  probable cause and no definitive duty to do so.
[01:52:14.000 --> 01:52:19.000]  So I would use that as an argument against this officer that he had no probable cause.
[01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:25.000]  Therefore, to run your information and access that database on nothing more than personal
[01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:32.000]  curiosity and speculation was an illegal use and access of the information.
[01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:39.000]  To my knowledge, no one has attempted to sue or go after them in that respect and they
[01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:41.000]  should be.
[01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:42.000]  Exactly.
[01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:47.000]  My question is, would this be considered an official oppression then?
[01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  I don't know.
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:51.000]  Does California have an official oppression statute?
[01:52:51.000 --> 01:52:53.000]  Yeah.
[01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  I'm sure they do.
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:52:59.000]  It's a federal violation at a minimum.
[01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:02.000]  Illegal search and seizure.
[01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:07.000]  So that's a Title 42 suit right there.
[01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  Yeah, but they're going to claim that they've got immunity and all that.
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  They have a right to do it.
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:18.000]  But just because they make the claim doesn't mean that it is true.
[01:53:18.000 --> 01:53:20.000]  It has to be a judicial suit.
[01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:22.000]  That's correct.
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:24.000]  Got it.
[01:53:24.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  Well, Eddie Craig, thank you very much, sir.
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:29.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:30.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:31.000]  Bye-bye.
[01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:32.000]  All right.
[01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:35.000]  Looks like Rob in California came back on as now last in line here.
[01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:39.000]  Rob, we've got about a little less than five minutes.
[01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  Oh, Eddie, Rob in Illinois.
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:42.000]  Yes.
[01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:43.000]  Are you there?
[01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  Yes.
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:46.000]  Oh, okay, because you said Rob in California.
[01:53:46.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:48.000]  Well, Rob in Illinois.
[01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  Yes.
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:50.000]  Go ahead.
[01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:51.000]  Let's see.
[01:53:51.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  I just hit a note here just a second ago.
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:54.000]  Oh, you know what?
[01:53:54.000 --> 01:53:58.000]  I gave out my email earlier and I did the transcript.
[01:53:58.000 --> 01:54:04.000]  I talked to you about three, four weeks ago about the seven deadly sins call you did almost
[01:54:04.000 --> 01:54:05.000]  a year ago.
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:11.000]  And if I can give that out again, if anybody's interested in that, I can send them the transcript
[01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:12.000]  of that.
[01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:13.000]  Okay.
[01:54:13.000 --> 01:54:15.000]  And then they can also download your calls.
[01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:19.000]  I would download all of them and then go back over that just to double-check because don't
[01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:22.000]  trust anything until you see it yourself.
[01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  But anyways, my email is rob1802 at mail.com.
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:40.000]  Again, that email address is rob1802 at mail.com for the seven deadly sins email.
[01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:44.000]  And I've also transcribed a few other very important calls and I can get that out to
[01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:46.000]  the other listeners in the meantime.
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  Okay.
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:53.000]  Also, the guy called in earlier a little bit ago about them not signing those green cards
[01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:57.000]  and there is another three-letter agency out there that's notorious for not signing that
[01:54:57.000 --> 01:54:58.000]  stuff.
[01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  So I'm also working on that because they have a big stamp, you know, and it says received
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:07.000]  but nobody is signing those green cards and they should be.
[01:55:07.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  Yeah.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:09.000]  Somebody should be.
[01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:10.000]  All right.
[01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  Anything else, Rob?
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:12.000]  Yeah.
[01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:15.000]  The other thing is on the foreclosure issue, I know this is not a foreclosure call but
[01:55:15.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  what that Brian brought up about the red light camera thing is and I had a light bulb go
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:27.000]  on in the last week and that is when you ask that attorney for his bar card to present,
[01:55:27.000 --> 01:55:32.000]  to show that he had the proof to be doing what he's doing, when it comes to foreclosures,
[01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:37.000]  the same thing can be said there, challenge, make that attorney that's coming against you
[01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:39.000]  prove who they are.
[01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  And the minute they pull that bar card out, then you can go file a bar grievance on you
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:48.000]  because every foreclosure is a debt collection action.
[01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:53.000]  And if you look at your classifieds, it says in there almost every single one of them,
[01:55:53.000 --> 01:55:58.000]  it says pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the plaintiff's attorney is
[01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:00.000]  a debt collector and blah, blah, blah.
[01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:01.000]  It says it right there.
[01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  So they're acting as a third party debt collector and they're essentially stealing your property
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:14.000]  away from you and you committed no harm and wrong against them and there's no contract
[01:56:14.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  between you and that third party debt collector.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  So that's a little tidbit.
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:19.000]  Okay.
[01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:20.000]  Well, thanks for calling in.
[01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:21.000]  Sure.
[01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:22.000]  Thanks, Eddie.
[01:56:22.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  Yep.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:24.000]  All right.
[01:56:24.000 --> 01:56:27.000]  I got about two and a half minutes left so I'm going to give you my answer to the question
[01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:31.000]  I asked at the beginning of the show given the situation on the side of the road where
[01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:35.000]  you asked the officer is his gun loaded.
[01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:40.000]  Now, having been through this training and having worked with these people and knowing
[01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:47.000]  the mindset and having worked opposite these people in proving how ignorant and what liars
[01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:53.000]  they actually are, this is a very dangerous thing to do by asking a cop if his gun's loaded
[01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:58.000]  when it's just you and him and you're alone anywhere.
[01:56:58.000 --> 01:57:00.000]  And here's why.
[01:57:00.000 --> 01:57:06.000]  First off, the scenario was the officer is already considering you to be a criminal.
[01:57:06.000 --> 01:57:11.000]  He is being taught from the get-go that you are dangerous to him, that you are out to
[01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:15.000]  take his life if he so much as blinks incorrectly.
[01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  He is on edge when he comes to you.
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:23.000]  He is out there alone and the only thing that can save him is a radio call and fast tires.
[01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:29.000]  So when you ask him if his gun is loaded, one of the first things in his mind is this
[01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:35.000]  person's talking about my gun like they want to know if they take it away from me, will
[01:57:35.000 --> 01:57:38.000]  they be able to use it.
[01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:43.000]  Now he's got it in his mind that he has to be careful that you may attempt to do exactly
[01:57:43.000 --> 01:57:50.000]  that, that you may in any way, shape or form attempt to take that gun away from him or
[01:57:50.000 --> 01:57:55.000]  at the very least be in possession of one of your own and it's going to come down to
[01:57:55.000 --> 01:57:58.000]  a quick draw contest.
[01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  Folks, do not ask a cop on the side of the road any time of day if his gun is loaded.
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  Just don't do that, okay?
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:14.000]  Please, I'm begging you, you will be a headline in the paper.
[01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  Don't do it.
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  Alright folks, this has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Traffic Show.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:22.000]  This has been your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:22.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  I want to thank all of you for listening and all of you for calling in.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  Folks, y'all be blessed, have a great night and a great week and I will see you again
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  next Monday.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:56.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New
[01:58:56.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:02.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the
[01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:26.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:37.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at
[01:59:37.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:52.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:52.000 --> 01:59:53.000]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:53.000 --> 02:00:08.000]  You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.